LTC 495-2019 Miami-Dade County Biscayne Bay Task Force SEptember 9, 2019 Meeting MIAMIBEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
NO. LTC# 495-2019 LETT' R TO COMMISSION
TO: Mayor Dan Gelber and Members o the City immission
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: September 13, 2019
SUBJECT: Miami-Dade County Biscayne Bay ask Force September 9, 2019 Meeting
I am pleased to provide you an update on the City of Miami Beach's presentation to the Miami-
Dade County Biscayne Bay Task Force meeting that took place on Monday, September 9, 2019.
This past February, Miami-Dade County established the Biscayne Bay Task Force to formalize
collaboration and exchange ideas addressing concerns related to Biscayne Bay among Miami-
Dade County, agency partners, non-profit groups, and other stakeholders. The goal of the Task
Force is to develop restoration, enhancement, and resilience strategies; to study; and, address
potential ecological concerns such as algal blooms, changes in biotic communities, seagrass
die-offs, sea level rise, and water quality.
This past Monday, Assistant City Managers Susy Torriente and Eric Carpenter, the Public Works
Department, and the Environment & Sustainability Department presented to the technical panel
an overview of the city's efforts in protecting Biscayne Bay. We are pleased to report the meeting
went very well. The Task Force applauded the city's efforts and regional leadership in pollution
prevention, flood mitigation efforts, stormwater management, and data gathering. Please find
attached the presentation. The presentation is also posted on www.mbrisingabove.com.
Attachments
A: Biscayne Bay Task Force Presentation — City of Miami Beach
J LM/SMT/ETC/RC/ESW/MK/m r
� , I I
1' ( t li d� -ill . .
. .•_. �.,- - ` . k fit, •+ .� J ...`r"-df'
' "Ran
:, -tom, _." p. 1 a 3 1 . .. �..
�3 -.�.A:zz�a rte►. _ "& -"7R ,
-y
• t_
s
sr i ^, `
.....-- r:a"
The Role of Municipalities in Protecting Biscayne Bay:
An Example from Miami Beach
Miami-Dade County Biscayne Bay Task Force 'I BEACH
RISING
September 9, 2019 ABOVE
.
. . _ �.
A
�! .� - 4 1.
,e,....: ,—..... 47,..,?..' - tiaw'.
I --_. ryuu^1J
jj t
•: 1 1 _ - 164_,
om
Fs
j) !
- ! T-.�• _. _;•... J �. .. �� as E' a -,-� \Ir a
.
- -
ll[[ s
.
T
. ! z '(
Presentation u ine
0 How do we fit into the big picture?
•
' Our "whY "
e 2
What have we learned ?
..
Recommendations
,-..'
' • --.,-_, - .- - -
,_ •'''-; _
. .
,..._.
.......,
. Al
, 44
, I
, - .. • --
„-....,-...._ .
_
•
, - -- -- -
„.
,•,„ --:. -
- • •-..mr...V,T... ,........
_ • -
• ',.... ..... ---
—
,, _•,. .
' +wirer'
iiiillko.
,o9IVIMIIIIPrir
_
il
•••••
''-i---,,::rir'''::,:,,....-•!'
' '''''''!., 4\,*.--• ''';'''tits,r".t..4.**W.''''7'.'2.----i".r.n'-:-.;-,;,,,,,,._ , ,....,:- . ,--,',,,,',
_.., ......,-
-' -.. ''.7i:-4.21::'-4.6 :„1-',_* ;'-',.,,..?...,!-:::...(--V.:.'' *.'',..t.' ..-....:- ,*4-:'.:'-', ., ''.,• .'2,-; .'::-...-.. ”.',''''''' ....'
'',...
.;----..:Ti:I.,-.4,''4.";
-,z,*.....y,t4.----.e.,,,,, .-- • --;.'-'=.---':-,- --..,-.".....---,•---4••:-•-•-•`---•- '• '•
-- .- ,"...', ----;••'.:,- 7ti.-„,z,,,„.,..---.44------. 4,
1;1-'-",-.;..,.-..;?‘*,....q..;--...,-----.TN-',,fT:,,,.----=-• ' ' -'
-: 7 -ii-....• --.".....:44,i,;,:'..7.--'--7--r..- _ . - -'
.r....,,,,,,j,:,.:...-1.i L r...,,t,....4*-2. 7.:.;;;4_. -.-.'-,r,.-.-z....=:'-'• '..,..-
:1•7-4-.-=714:1e7, __ _ .
;•---„.. .-,:i'.'-:„2.--- 7.:;:.::::;"..-f..-.•474--..:4--Z-:,--....:"--t;k7%---.‘4::-`,.`..`-'-'-=---;,-,---7-_--s--- --
-'.,...--;::-.7:t;.1:7-:--S‘- -
.--
.... ......• -...
11111 How do w
e fitel
i
the big picture ?
MI .NEW .,..
16 , Avow , ,20i II ;
0
w
, ',.,:.;..,.....,:: 414*IP' •.„\,:.
r 41
,1 PLACE :> 4* PEOPLE' iv PAT' `AY$
r '1R z- a _.-- .p a-._ —<.)1"):.
• .
. •
- .IIK .f OBJECTIVES' ' OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES
" i ,
l , 4
may, . • Safeguard vital ecosystems
!� •Cultivate financial stability • Preplan for post recovery
wwr.w RESILIENT _.
! • Create mobility solutions •
t :: .- Al � Advance public health priorities • Cultivate resilience expertise
,... \ ,.� • Increase energy eHlctenci s • Strengthen community • Develop shared resources
V • Leverage planning response
opportunities Leverage our dollars
• •
t Communicate resilience
Enhance housing options• • Implement our Strategy
A
r
..� 19 618 � ,,
.z 7 ,. � :* actions spotlights 22
1°�, E i ' , s �' .. 'ilk. R E S I L case actions spotlights actions spotlights
t �.� ." GREATER a case
I.t & THE HE 15 studies Case studies
studies
' OBJECTIVES PROTECT AND ENHANCE OUR ENVIRONMENT AND INVEST IN
MI INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS AND ASSETS THAT BUILD RESILIENCE BENEFITS LIKE
L , REDUCING FLOOD RISK AND INCREASING SUSTAINABILITY.
POI: ... .... _ s
r , _ ' ' sib
„� ” COMMISSION GOALS
ver
'` or •Clean water strategy(2020) �r
t 611 Mob'�� '',
D • Improved infrastructure(2050)
....in 111/4, :il of)
t
"" '` ,t •Stormwater,water,and sewer
` planning(2020)
a.a•
�
< < YM „ Jno0
,••
We are committed to investing in our
city upgrading and u radin public infrastructure .
- .
. ,w ,... . i
4".°
U
l'
4.
0
. ,
:i.,
9
,,,
A . n
/ s
.p .
+ t' -
•
i ` Ae A._-
Stress: Aging water infrastructure, low water pressure
Shock: Water main break
We are committed to investing in our
city upgrading and u radin public infrastructure .
.,,,,,,,,,,,, - - _ 4:__ .,,,
„,.., '04<1 5 , _
x
jg*
vosl
§4 , ' u dor 11 or+nrcR an fro 1 :�'c o 0 k o Ci _
•: , ,
� Iasi
Ar
Ilk
, ,
f
' ars ` !
Mk
ADP: „a-0P-
1 k orik
1 •01.19 v 4 • 2014.12 22 1 Iv
1.51 ft . ' 2.31, ft .�
R+
Stress: Aging sewer infrastructure, infiltration
Shock: Sewer main break, wastewater overflows
We are committed to adapting to sea
p J
level rise and reducing flood risk .
- •, ,
, . .. .I` p
2013 _ .
1
((4
Indian Creek Drive 2015 a
t f� W-
BEFORE _ =
Bay Road 2011
I
Stress: Sea level rise, sunny day flooding
Shock: Flash flooding, rain bombs, storms
lad3
,, _
lirrr-=
2
. -: , 'fi�- 4 rsL -,--....,,,,.....!-:;%-„..-,,,,I, ,.
_s
y`,�
" --r _
0 What have we learned ?
,1:Yb1Y.1. ._?P_..
gL•tOW, rt=+ ...... GQw3i6i
1 L.
M4f_il
-.
Nutrients a ear to
. .
. �,
. - the pp be threat
„,,,..
_ + toBiscayne Bay .
, , ( 4 hi*WIC
.44-Et ♦- Q[n LtldiMClr • -'44
iulDli r�,
-'''y \ ..„. tzLecut \
taxi s - ► r
491'6046 1 r:
Nitrogen Loading into Biscayne Bay .
Miami Beach Rainfall
4 NORTH BISCAYNE BAY NITROGEN LOADING
.2% 25.3% , !
,... '; G•9 ]HAKE EREEK
Snake Creek 2s 3 "
38.1°la srwKt caeca!PAN a I
Miami River �;�
i.:t*
F 0 ,..
Biscayne
Canal AIKAYMt cmou.
11.496 Li ,„-'
Littler RiverAllrita( c 7 �,
..�(JJ
OISUYNE r a
24.5% A AIWA awAE 11.4., 1
1
. , RAIN/ALL (2
'7 0.2'ro
ti C.•B LITTLE RIYFR :y I
<.ai ?4MIAMI OFACH
04
74.541 $ 0 S.,a
EXCLUDED NUTRIENT SOURCESI
OCTAN OUTFALLS i i 1 r,= 1'
,
SEWAGE SPILLS _ �O�d
I
SEDIMENT RESUSPENSION C-6 L y �
GROUND WATER INFLOWS S ,,--T J� �,
TIDAL INFLOWS —��. Jr.. _."""_ --- f '-
SMALL BASINS(PORT MIAMI,SURFSIDE, MIAMI RIVER
VIRGINIA KEY) , 35.1"° tA '
s f : 1_
ARDUtRA AA I A M I B E AC H4 1' l
"Ardurra Group,Inc.2019
Phosphorous Loading into Biscayne Bay .
Miami Beach Rainfall
NORTH BISCAYNE BAY PHOSPIIORU S IAOADIN(:
'.8°r.
24.5% 1
G9 y
lir Snake Creek SNAKF rNFFK
SISAKr[MiiK CANAL 24.. ,
, 36.5% i °`.�
e If x
; Miami River / �' �1 L I
Biscayne Canal i •INCArNC CANAL.
r'
N
r- "''t_ ". 'f
�` 11 2%
.a.x
-til
Littler River . C-� - �., t I
•-..
�* '' LIMA MIA CANAL 11.2 u
1x. 24.2% _�— .._ — `--�.- .x.
u, r"
Ir -- 4
s x?� � . E ; -RAINFALL -t
3 a. 4<a
' 0.8
I
A t, ti
.N. "` C-6 LII ILL R[VLR r 4‘1'
♦ MIAMI SEMEN
"'s � s t
EXCLUDED NUTRIENT SOURCES +i I f I j
� 1 t
f I a r
OCEAN OUTFALLS 1-41_ 1 '� 1" ( 14
•
SEWAGE SPILLS G 1 ` .JiO
SEDIMENT RESUSPENSION C�•
C-.5_1r1, /��
GROUND WATER INFLOWS r "�� f
TIDAL INFLOWS —r. �— }r.�
SMALL BASINS(PORT MIAMI,SURFSIDE, �� MIAMI RIVER .�
VIRGINIA KEY) " s=
Ate^ MAMIBEACH
.
"Ardurro Group,Inc.2019
We are committed toreventin
p g
pollution at the source .
• Changing Habits:
• Polystyrene Ban ��
• Plastic Straw/Bags Ban
• Recycling Ordinance 0 ib I 440
. •
laraliktk
• Green Procurement ••••
• Florida Friendlycurement Ink" w
• Round-up Ban 1Nuu11 dos
• Educating and Incentivizing: 4111 / ii, ellli
• Recycling Campaign (2012) tAi t mg :'
• Anti-litter Campaign (201 7)
• PlasticFreeMB Campaign (2019) . Mb' al I *
• Water Quality Campaign (2019) 417i ,,.4 40101%, to
• Institutionalizing Sustainability:
• Green Building Ordinance itis4. Miiin 4111 41!1
• EV Charging Stations Network mai
4111i
• Beachwalk Projects
6 4441
• Measuring and Monitoring:
• Water Quality Sampling Program
• Recycling Assessment
Pollution Prevention
Education & Outreach Impact
25,000 lbs textiles recycled
+t
14,000 lbs hazardous waste
collected
45 outreach events " U
(3,000 attendees)
700+ social media posts
(2.9 million impressions)
1 1 7 ftPlasticFreeIV B businesses
Photo credit: Ben Hicks
Pollution Prevention:
Operations 8( Maintenance
Stopped
6 , 000+ lbs Sediment
1 , 030 lbs Nitrogen
660 lbs Phosphorous
3, 279 , 660 lbs trash
from entering Biscayne Bay in 2018
Stormwater Management Across Miami-Dade County
(Data shown is as reported in the Cycle 4, Year 1 NPDES Annual Report by each utility)
City Population Area Miles of Total NPDES Total NPDES Dollars Spent Dollars Spent
(Per 2017 census) (mil,per U.S. Pipes Expenditures Budget per resident per mit
Census (12/2017-12/2018) (12/2017-12/2018) (Rounded to nearest (Rounded to
Bureau) whole number) nearest whole
number)
Miami 2,744,878 1,899 282
Dade $641,000 $1,200,000 $0.23 $338
Coral 51,095 37.3 19.93 $2,571,023 $2,2126,703 $5 $68,928
Gables
Bal 3,059 0.6 3.09 $30,000 $32,886 $10 $50,000
Harbour
Sunny Isles 22,175 1 .8 6.89 $556,396 $584,177 $25 $309,109
Beach
City of 463,347 35.87 100
Miami $12,575,572
$12,307,100 $27 $350,587
Key 13,182 1.71 0.82 $504,463 $469,177 $38 $295,008
Biscayne
Miami 92,307 15.2 102 $28,327,000 $29,390,000 $307 $1,863,618
Beach
Surfside 5,841 0.6 9.75 $4,217,419 $4,156,189 $722 $7,029,032
Stormwater BMPs Across Miami-Dade County
(Data shown is as reported in the Cycle 4, Year 1 NPDES Annual Report by each utility)
City Miles of Litter Control Street % of Stormwater
Pipes Frequency Sweeping Pipes Cleaned Per
Frequency Year
Key 0.82 3x/week 2x/week 0%
Biscayne
Coral 19.93 Not reported Daily 7.88%
Gables
City of 7 days a weeks
Miami 100 (permitee)/ biweekly 7 days a week 36%
& monthly
(contractor)
Miami Dade 282 12 12 cyclesper 100%
ear
Sunny Isles 6.89 Weekly Weekly 100%
Beach
Surfside 9.75 5x/week 2x/month 100%
Bal Harbour 3.09 Not reported 3x/week 100%
Miami 102 Daily Daily 142%
Beach
There are no known se tic
p tanks
on Miami Beach .
,„, ,,‘,„...,„.. .,,,,_ .. . .. . .
Miami Beach Sanitary ,. .. •
. _ '` *poAwMeRrNM
iii
Sewer System _:
:::—..1-,21"1,:
r N
41;;1 j
11. , r.. ..... ........................ IT, ,',-'':...,.77.'77,-:,,,,,T:
,, 1 ,-/ : • W+E
_ Y
0
r• ••
4... •
• . , ; •0144
i. 4
r "Lao
i •
is
-.. ..--......0 „
:,G.
•
6 .74fdae
J 0
3 •
... _,..... ..... .
.. ,
,.. . . % , ,,•;_.., . ,,,,,„ „;, ,_ i
1
. . .... • -7,. k, i I
E :
t
,.
c::
. . , . ILegend I
"+.` .• `` 1 m `� , . , ----Urban Development t3aumano l
• Inerablr ParceM>
r
Sanitary Sewer System , €
Kx w . ._ -...— _ ,_ , 1
*,. SaMary Sewer System
- _.....
�,. !,. # •` =i-.�_,_7._«�.___ ._--- minor=--�7 kAw.•s -Ce11u10s Ji parcels uc wxj
0 6 50 wastewater
se rvc r
In 2018 , rease violations cost the city
Y
$50 , 000 and caused 41 SSOs .
-,,,,-__,-_-„,::--,-. , ,4? ,
..„,, , ,
, ,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. : ,-, ...: ,, , lik
s ,,,., „„ ,„ ..„.,, ,,,,4.,„ ;
__ _ ,. 44,
_ .
...„
., . ,_,_
.....,..,....... 4,
..,,
., .,,,,.., „,,,,, , , -„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4 1,,,,
,,,,,,
, M � it *
,r fl.
Ame lu means pollutants entered our
p
sto rmwa to r system .
, , .. „... ..-- :
rt
M,
, _ Tannic water
° 6 Street1 Construction run-off -
. Sunset Island 4
is I, ♦ v
s, r, c '"..'4 -.
;`
it
• I
ars
INalit te, •471,4.,,„ .
t=
1
. t
We investigate each plume and take
action according to the source .
Cross-training departments Environmental inspection programs
.-1,
t........-..... •
1
4
rillor
•,.. 11 '
.... ,4
il, .4“M:::. •In. . . . ---4, ••••:-, e' ;I`
I • )
lerc -
.41 .- i .
—
.‘eal-e, •
*; ''
*, -
e _-, •
r 47 • - .' .
• — , e . '
.., e
104 r
.,.. Science-based management
1 rri _
MIAMI BEACH , r
/ CODE COMPUANCE
/ IkH141.11.1111 Ilk .' 4.1/A SOF 111'•• ,,,.. •
._,....unip• ,• ' 7 .„.........,__,. ill-, i
•
I t / •
1
' I ---••••....• 4
. Illibp
141414.661111101.' .
.--*•--7 •
'
NA_--..,
" Trust , but verify . "
. . _ . .. _ .......... .
.. _ ... ....
li, .11 •
e. a
•
A -- • ,
psi 0. +`—" .w•c
Ig... f-- , : ''''ff' n', -:: -
.r
1
1 7
‘14II il . ';'
.
-•'...-'4.---- -
, tif
�c
� Vim.
1- , '!• �. 1v.,. r�;...
r.
.V
41.1101.,
• C > r ! - Ali
F
111+ 1 1 a•
{{ '}} • !'_.
1
4-
..„... „twit
...,••• I . ..
x
*f'"„r Iv' 1 Legend
ftapttrul
.. is .. r • 'Ael Wei
11111
t� 1,. :r+ 1 1 Ile
Pollution Reduction:
Waterway Debris Removal
Removes an average of
100,000 lbs litter*
per year
*Approx.12 shipping containers!
/ It
\ / /
t '
e e
. 1 / •
4 1
< . - 4,• ., , I k --
, . . ,
- I/
/ , • •
• ,,
.e.
i
-f..., 1 ,--j ./.'
''I 4 ' )
, *
. ,..,
'
„....,
I ,-
AO
2 - 30 FEET
I I .
5 x
d • ,, e „., ,,
• • st ' .....,
Woo. '•••• — p ve- '
1 r
# t s •r,.,,'d ), ir14
4 -f 4
r I el,...116 thd......
.._ 0...........- .._. _ . ..„.,... -
...`,..
Qiiii., ,, 1
I [ 1 . \ _. .„....
. .,
,............
I ! __.
0 •I,
30 - 55 FEET
s
Ii
I pi.... i
1
'"' ' I * .1' •44 '
,...,
.44.
4 .
•
n •l' .- ii. lc
%. Iit
;12
, • , ..,l'A * 4,:t
' ' ...,. „, 4: 4 • , , *
,
- '1 ,,, 4 4 '
,•414.-
0 55 0 275 0 °55.N GIS ,
Legend City of Miami Beach: ....=;; MilA
. I ' 1/4- ' ' A*'''l I i ilL' ilLti,
4 - l'. .11.4
• PlOp31410 PiPAII01101 44 11; Groundwater Monitoring Wells ilia. -
i
1::3 Cty ltmis
t '''" .9 4: k 55 - 80 FEET
Groundwater levels in Miami Beach are
connected to the tides .
Tide VS Groundwater Chart for Fisher Park Monitoring Well
1.5
GROUNDWATER
1 1 i
j i
t ' ,9
0.5
Z
tit c 1
i_ o
W -0.5
I
1
1
, I \./
-1.5
TIDE
-2
3/15/2019 1:00 3/17/2019 1:00 3/19/2019 1:00
A4' '
4
44 4
4
• ,�4 . .•r 4 4 4'4 44
4• 'a r
4.444
+ + .. f �'
'4.1% y'' .1av4
�, 7 '' •4a. ``,4.4'.
♦
•
North ' �.. 4.. •
.Bay
r'r
,;...;:a90 ,
wa
fv4
,. 1' "
4
±
4 , •
°
S.
•• 4*
: .•
M
a X_
M
•
1 's V
4 444yra , °
•
__LK _ .
'47- E . i
44 4 A r iii
L 4 ', .
+ * % V
+ . + �•
, i .
.+,+ 4 D '
0.4.-. .:).. ...
' "a
It14444
• a •
• * ' s41
. O
' �4 '4'
l4
•
44.41411 17. •
a
44 4 `+ ,A�ri1 4
\ ♦° , + ...it
• V
a
a) ;♦
• • +_ , * ;
CD
3 ....• 4 - a a�
♦:"-• `4
r-, ,
vl
r" i
N . 1. . •'1 �V . a�.
a
`j 4 4♦ .� •
‘
-. 174 ' a.4 4+M1 .a
,--r , a
--,,44. -1 ,qtr►
(4) ,o',, °a°
4 , 1+�,(a
4 ".4
74 . , 4.
Shallow wells can cause floodingduring
high tides in low areas .
....
..... "....atinnia Ai
"NI f
: _, ' 'N,„ ,
,„„, .,,,,,,,A
4.
FRESH WATER
SALT WATER
4 CLASS V
INJECTION WELL
_ iiShallow Wells (80ft — 120ft)
How open minded are we to
modernizingChapter 24 and
innovative ideas ?
_ ; .„
�_. , -.0% ,.I..,-. . a . ., iv, �' Proposed retention pond
ete
_I Irani a 6iugtt - f t
7 a4 �i'A�r MN r a +F ) i fil .
# F 1 i
t�
, i
a r r
^Y. ' # Mil.i. - I ' R L:T�- .� € I 2 .'^' .
di
a#
ya
R
, x r +
al s
ea F" &r Vis �,1�1�r�•
'. 4 "�,
F
IP
4cyca4
ice ' y� � 1 1-
`IV 4 A' �' '� ; `#�,. .a .-{
r -
1Lt LEI HIg1"i a` 9".;w* (]QM[1 M rc If fil4 p 7.
't _ NII t
lip., r '.,,, '. 1 M:."i } • ,,'``` „",,,g ``,
may,,
is
w' , r,'jr.,:.T�" ! ! dli�1�/7s1 4�" ar_ f`' *+ ,,+,� ''�'fi .� f# s - '
-;..--,41, ..4.‘,:, .. .. ; ,, ,,,,c'
rik.,ii,., ' i.4,4; : ..,1.1):11 , '14,1: "..... ...,,...,.. . - ,:rim .5 ,r, _
'TS
Jk*% iii i' 1 r] $E ' �,
,
gruL; n
!4,11leuu t
. a - s.ln It '
n `
fr+r i " ytF S4Ei i . -
'' • •w-• tra• , r w
$ S r ,'
k0..a 4406136.1 ej ,,, ,
w a � .� � I
Park
Former Par 3/Future Community
f
_ '�,IIRIii '�e r.�x, �.
The Chesapeake Bay
Governance Model L .,"-r- -•
....4... I * re— •4,7-1,. -•-•-• _
--- ,' • t r sib•.".
. -
' I-. 41_
•' : ', .°.
/ \t V.° i 4
),..• Rk4
i NJ,
limmeip.. li 0
I ' ik440:*.•
BRAIIIMA.,if? • - r0
MI.11111$.,,ATV P..A
If t ,
114.,_••••_
- * •
illo• II •••• -,(1
1 •r- 1\
.,...
....... .• 4.,, .
.. . .
. I .
..,... , ii
V... , . .
I (Rao scnison
-• ,
op 4%110°. .41 ro • I. ••••••,.. Jr-. - '... •• ‘,
...,i ...a,„, ...
-, 1 . •Ib ' - ''.1,1*-".
N:City it _..
--- . -
...... ..
--
1.
—
„.•---f:40,4". • 1 • ..... I ...Alit,...01.,
&lIocAt
- ' ....... \
---s„ .." ore--- ---1 •-•
0. .,....,) 1-11411l4111
...-; :b....
Pittsburgh • . ,,
.
. lir r- '''s,1 -1----/ . . .„,,,, • ...........1..:•-•
• Si 1•-•4iss NEW ? 1 4 1.,.. ---"'
• i --- ......., ..4.'"' ... 7 : *
.0 JERS.. -...
ar -.
-- tt ii"
ii.L.0 ..
t 41' . Ba S
,"
...- ik---- "• 'r...-:., .
/
‘" ? "401111' •- •r
WEST • 'I
"ir-
AWARE
'I .,•• ••••••••••• ,I.O.
VIRGINIA i •*7# 140";;;I:e - I — .770Arlic;!:. -7" .,. • ^.....
ik '•taLLI!!.::. 1 -
1-7—
,... -41 7..T. ..... . -..Y-' •- ip !
.-cfrYLAND -4 • 1
, /‘.40., 4 j ••• -•-•‘ ,r,, ,
. tr
....
" s,7A, .-
............_._..c., , „....... —..... _...._..... . . .. .r....7.,..,,.!-Vr. —
Ct Atlantic ._
..-
........_ NI
. •...
......../..*,,,,,, ki. ...‘ .. 3 Ocean .....
..... . ,. ._
.1-,71:.....
.0...„Abol ...."_,./...., ._ : •..
*1.•44,or
r.........., = „ =,-.....,
1.,,,, ' Ar‘lokilik'S
t...............- Of.1$* . . ...,41.....e, ....
VIRGINIA Ner.vort Nol),,,,worsvrprua tkazit 9...... . 4t. j
•......--
- * ...-
"There is a great need for a
e Ch e s ap e a ke B . T private-sector organization that
can represent the best interests
Govern a n c e Model of the Chesapeake Bay. It should
build public concern, then
encourage government and
Chesapeake Executive Council private citizens to deal with these
Citizens'Advisory problems together.//
Committee g
rt
Principals'Staff Committee —Congressman Rogers C. B.
Morton
Local Government t
Advisory Committee
Management Board
Scientific & Technical
Advisory Committee
Communications
t____Workgroup --
Goal 1191151enlilMilfkm Teams Science,
Technkal Analysis.
Sustainable Protect& Restoaet Protect& Maintain Foster Enhance and Reporting
Fisheries Vital habitats Restore Water tiealthy Eheupeake Pannering<
Quality Watersheds Stewardship Leadership
& Management
lmpi.m.n imprevniptt rttation implen»ntJban fmpl.mrntattan In.p/+p+n.rttat on
Woe*Uu Werkgroroup% Workgroups Wor cgroup3. Workgroups
https://www.chesapeakebay.net/who/how_we_are_organized
suoli_ opuewwooaa too
•
..... . ,..„„...„,.... .
,
,.........„....,,,,_ ___..: ...._
. . ,
----.• _.
•
. . •,..
-. , .. . _ ._
• . _-_,:sz
.•::.. .,....-•.'7--.'" 1;; .',-..t:'•:•4,i47-- ;4r-.-i'77.,-‘----',--'• - -- - - -
-4!
1 il
' • ' ,- ••Y-.:0 iTM'.,z-- •• -',. - ' • ';-_.Y.-,• --- -'`".''''‘- - - .
- - -4411■K
, .
-MP -..,_
..
'.-- • . -
I
---
...... -.-- -- ....
... —_ _ — -.... -
-. ..,
. --- ....
............ILI.-
•............ ..
•
Recommendations
1 . Leverage work across the region. We need regular coordination between
municipal practitioners working on Biscayne Bay issues.
2. Create a new governance structure. We need a new action-focused entity that is
focused on raising and allocating money, implementing mitigation projects,
coordinating research, and spurring innovation that benefits Biscayne Bay.
(Chesapeake Bay)
3. Capitalize on municipal resources. We need to allow municipalities to
supplement County programs (i.e. deputize) to meet their communities' needs.
4. Consistency is key. We need to implement consistent regional standards for
operations, maintenance, monitoring.
5. Upgrade minimum criteria. We need to create new Best Management Practices
beyond NPDES for all municipalities on, in, near, or around Biscayne Bay.
6. Modernize Chapter 24. We need to update the regulations to reflect changing
conditions and allow for new and innovative solutions that can improve Biscayne
Bay.
7. Expand Plastic Free MB to Plastic Free 305. We need to replicate programs that
are effective in dealing with the most pressing issues.
8. Maximize impact. We need to spend money and allocate resources toward
those actions that will have the greatest impact, such as targeting nutrients.
THANK YOU !
fir. .•�- �E� ,. ' 4
f.. tai ry .I ) 1!4F�=, _ r �'I �d •
Freshwater Lens
Precipitation
Biscayne u, • Ocean
Bay •.... .!+ , -� :;.• R•
F
cast`
Decision Making Process
kt
n'
w1,:` Foctor
"�'--." iDesign of safety
0
enn
1 1 4.0
MEAN NW _..p*� `,\J i r
0.6 NAVD
Useful /A\
lie 3Y Um1ns ►t 2.0
of Rain
ittojedeel
10 yrs SLR Gravity
START /11_3.7 � YES 5 yrs 6.0 1.5
lt
2013 SW 0 N Foctor
of Safety
1.7 20 yrs 11PLftliNi 10 yrs 7.5 1.25 Future
2.7 R Base Treatment Decisions
i _i;:i
in Gee OutfallsOptions
il
' 1111111.
MAX H
IJ � IJ ;
25 yrs NO
1.7 NA � 1.0
11R2h NO NO
NO
NAR 3 h
There are different ways to move water.
Evaluation of Disposal Options In Low Lying Areas
Effective Water Low No
in Miami Quality Carbon Customer Financially
Disposal Options Beach Treatment Footprint Disruptions Responsible
Gravity outfalls0 • • ill ill
Deep Injection Wells1111 ill 10 lb 4111)
Shallow Gravity Wells0 0 III II 41111
Pumped Outfalls0 1111 0 III III