20130520 SCMMIAMI BEACH
Special City Commission Meeting
City Hall, Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, 1700 Convention Center Drive
May 20,2013
Mayor Matti Herrera Bower
Vice-Mayor Jonah Wolfson
Commissioner Jorge R. Exposito
Commissioner Michael Gongora
Commissioner Jerry Libbin
Commissioner Edward L. Tobin
Commissioner Deede Weithorn
City Manager Jimmy L. Morales
City Attorney Jose Smith
City Clerk Rafael E. Granado
Visit us at www.miamibeachfl.gov for agendas and video "streaming" of City Commission Meetings .
ATTENTION ALL LOBBYISTS
Chapter 2, Article VII, Division 3 of the City Code of Miami Beach, entitled "Lobbyists,"
requires the registration of all lobbyists with the City Clerk prior to engaging in any lobbying
activity with the City Commission, any City Board or Committee, or any personnel as defined
in the subject Code sections. Copies of the City Code sections on lobbyists laws are
available in the City Clerk's office. Questions regarding the provisions of the Ordinance
should be directed to the Office of the City Attorney.
Special note : In order to ensure adequate public consideration, if necessary, the Mayor and City
Commission may move any agenda item to the alternate meeting date , which will only be held if needed.
In addition, the Mayor and City Commission may, at their discretion, adjourn the Commission Meeting
without reaching all agenda items.
Call to Order-9:00a.m .
Requests for Additions, Withdrawals, and Deferrals.
REGULAR AGENDA
R9 -New Business and Commission Requests
R9A Discussion On The Boardwalk.
(City Manager's Office)
1
lD MIAMIBEACH
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO : Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and M
FROM : Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE : May 20, 2013
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ON THE BOARDW
During the Dr. Stanley Sutnick Citizen's Forum, at the February 6, 2013 Commission meeting, a
motion was made and approved by acclamation giving the Administration direction that future
segments of the beachwalk should be elevated in order to have an ocean view. Following this
motion the City Commission referred discussion of boardwalk matters to the Land Use and
Development Committee.
Additionally, the Historic Preservation Board passed a resolution encouraging the Commission to
consider the retention of the elevated wooden boardwalk and for the City to engage the State in
exploring the possibility of developing a process to allow the approval of the elevated boardwalk
structures.
At the April 23 , 2013 , Land Use and Development Committee meeting, a discussion of the
Boardwalk issue was held . A motion was adopted indicating that there was a consensus reached
on keeping the existing , raised boardwalk , and that priority is to be given to complet ing the
beachwalk link between 46thand 64th Streets , and then study the potential of adding a bike path at
grade, adjacent to the existing raised boardwalk . The Administration was directed to evaluate
existing projects that contemplate the removal of portions of the boardwalk, and report back to the
LUDC on progress.
At the May 8th Commission meeting , during the Dr. Stanley Sutnick Citizen's Forum ,
representatives from the Seville Marriott project appeared and spoke to the Commission about
their impending development and the difficulty of changing course with the treatment of the rear of
their property if they were required to retain the Boardwalk after designing their project to interface
with a grade level beachwalk. The City Commission set a special meeting for May 20 , 2013 to
discuss the matter further.
BACKGROUND
The wooden boardwalk was built in the mid-1980 's and extended from the south end of Collins
Park at 21st Street to the north end of Indian Beach Park at 47'h Street. The boardwalk is an
elevated wooden structure that lies on state lands but is owned and maintained by the City. The
boardwalk is 12 feet wide and is dedicated solely to pedestrian use and for safety does not allow
for use by bicyclists.
The City of Miami Beach is developing a series of bicycle/pedestrian/greenway projects called the
Atlantic Greenway Network (AGN). The AGN will consist of two main trail systems: the beachwalk,
which extends in a northbound/southbound direction between the erosion control line and the dune
system, and the neighborhood trails, which extends in all directions through the south , middle, and
Agenda Item R q A
Date 5-~0-13 2
City Commission memo -Boardwalk
May 20, 2013
Page 2 of6
north beach neighborhoods. The existing boardwalk is not part of the AGN because its current
width does not allow for safe bicycle and pedestrian joint use. However, the beachwalk projects
consist of on-grade, ADA accessible pathways that support bicycle use and other recreational
activities that are in line with the goals of the AGN.
Past & Current Projects
In 2009, during the development of theW-Hotel, the boardwalk fronting this property was removed
and replaced with pavers from 21st Street to 23rd Street. The developer designed, constructed, and
partially funded 885 feet of beachwalk east of the W-Hotel and Collins Park and on the 22nd
Streetend. The total project cost was $1,107,225. The developer's construction cost was $582,225
plus another $275,000 in Right-of-Way fees that the City applied to the project. The City
contributed remaining $250,000 toward the project.
In October 2012, the City began the removal of the existing elevated boardwalk and replacement
with approximately 950 feet of an on-grade paver pathway from the south property line of the Eden
Roc Hotel (approximately 45th Street) to the north terminus of the wooden boardwalk at
approximately 4th Street. Construction is anticipated to be complete June 2013. Eden Roc
funded the permitting and design of the beachwalk. The total construction cost for this project is
$1,063,550, which is funded through $704,000 from a Florida Department of Transportation grant
and $359,550 from the City.
Committed Private Development Projects
The Planning Department, as part of the development review process, has accepted voluntary
proffers from a number of upland properties that are adjacent to the boardwalk for them to assist in
the development of segments of a public beachwalk. The Fontainebleau, Ocean Grand Hotel,
Versailles Project, Saxony Project, Seville Project, and the Perry Hotel have all committed or are in
negotiations with the City to construct or fund the construction of a beachwalk for the public benefit.
ANALYSIS
The 2025 Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Commission on April 13,
2011 and became effective July 1, 2011. Pursuant to the policy adopted by the City Commission
as part of the 2025 Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan, the Administration has continued to
implement the beachwalk and baywalk projects in order to further the City's vision of a continuous
on-grade recreational path running north/south along the coast linking the City's South, Middle, and
North Beach Neighborhoods.
The City's Beachfront Management Plan with the State of Florida also lists the development of the
AGN as a management activity that enhances the natural resource value and/or public recreation
value for which the lands were acquired . The Beachfront Management Plan states that the AGN
serves to help conserve the dune ecosystem and provide significant economic and social benefit
by creating a continuous coastal network for alternative transportation and community
enhancement.
This vision was also documented in the City's Atlantic Greenway Network Master Plan adopted by
City Commission on October 17, 2007. As such, it has been the City's policy that as oceanfront
properties redevelop the Planning Department, as part of the development approval process,
negotiates with private property owners to remove the elevated structure where one exists and to
construct an on-grade beachwalk that can safely accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians.
3
City Commission memo -Boardwalk
May 20, 2013
Page 3 of6
The City has already made a substantial investment in the development of the AGN . Florida
Department of Transportat ion (FOOT) funds are available for alternative transportation facilities
that improve mobility . To date , the City has obtained more than $6 ,000 ,000 in funding from FOOT
to design and construct the coastal portion of the AGN . These funds are contingent upon
establishing an alternative transportation corridor that is accessible by non-motorized vehicles
(bikes , skate boards , roller blades , etc) as well as pedestrians .
Other Considerations
Individuals often loiter beneath the elevated boardwalk. Homeless encampments can often go
undetected for long periods of time. This , coupled with the large number of feral cats living under
the boardwalk , can lead to unsan itary conditions that cause a public health concern.
Permitting Requirements
All construction that occurs east of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) requires a
permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The CCCL Permitting
Program goal is to protect the coastal system from improperly sited and designed structures which
can destabilize or destroy the beach and dune system . These standards may be more stringent
than those already applied in the rest of the coastal building zone because of the greater forces
expected to occur in the more seaward zone of the beach during a storm event.
During the CCCL permit application process , FDEP reviews a project's construction plans to
determine if the proposed design is a major or minor structure. No major structures can be
constructed east of the Erosion Control Line (ECL). In addition , during the permitting process
FDEP will request that the footprint of any structure (beachwalk or boardwalk) be within a given set
back from the ECL . Until plans are presented to FDEP they will not make a formal determination if
a structure is considered major or minor. The City has not presented FDEP with a plan to permit
any new boardwalk structures , thus at this time we do not have precedent on if a new or larger
boardwalk structure could be permitted .
Potential Options
On February 6 , 2012 , Commission directed Administration that future segments of the beachwalk
should be elevated in order to have an ocean view . Staff has identified four potential alternatives
for the boardwalk, including the opt ion approved by Commission to construct of a raised
beachwalk .
1. Continue to maintain existing boardwalk.
2 . Widen existing boardwalk .
3. Remove boardwalk and replace with on-grade beachwalk.
4 . Remove boardwalk and raise the grade before constructing a beachwalk.
Alternative 1 -maintain the existing boardwalk and replace structure as it reaches the end of its
lifespan. The existing raised boardwalk has gradually declined throughout the years making it
more costly for the City to maintain . In the last two years , the City has spent over $275,000 to
repair and maintain the boardwalk in working condition. The boardwalk pavilions located at
selected entrances require additional maintenance of the roof and bench structures. If the
boardwalk were to be destroyed by storm surge or the structural integrity becomes compromised,
4
City Commission memo -Boardwalk
May 20, 2013
Page 4 of6
the City will need to apply for a CCCL permit to build a new structure , which FDEP will evaluate at
that time.
Alternative 2 -widen the existing boardwalk. The boardwalk is currently 12 feet wide and does not
permit safe use for joint use by pedestrians and alternative transportation options . The Federal
Highway Administration recommends that a shared path be at least 15 feet to accommodate
pedestrians and bicyclists safely . The City may be able to extend the footprint landward of the
existing boardwalk structure . The entire boardwalk system ranges from 0 to 15 feet east of the
ECL. Thus , the City may need to obtain easements from the adjacent properties in the areas were
ECL is the western edge of the existing footprint. FDEP would need to review this concept to
provide feedback if widening of the existing boardwalk would be considered major or minor
structure.
Alternative 3 -continue with the current policy of removing the boardwalk as sections become
funded and replace with an on-grade beachwalk . Attachment B provides photographs of the
existing beachwalks in north beach and south beach. Based on previous consultations with FDEP ,
the agency prefers the low profile , frangible pavers to the wooden boardwalk structure because
they would be expected to cause less impact to upland property during a storm surge event. Under
this option , the phasing of demolition and construction would need to be coordinated to minimize
impacts to current users .
Alternative 4 -removal of the boardwalk and replacement of a beachwalk with an elevated paver
pathway to allow for greater ocean views . This alternative would require additional fill and ,
depending on the elevations of the adjacent dune and upland property , may require the
construction of retention walls to ensure the structural integrity of the raised pathway . The FDEP
may consider a raised pathway of this nature a ma j or structure , which may not be feasible . This
add it ional scope under this alternat ive would result in a significant cost inc rease fo r both permitting
and construction.
Note that the general figure that has been quoted for removal of the boardwalk and construction of
the at-grade beachwalk is approximately $1 ,000 per linear foot of beachwalk .
PLANNING ANALYSIS
As mentioned above , several development projects have been approved with requirements for
removal of portions of the existing boardwalk and its replacement with an at-grade beachwalk . The
pending status of these projects is given below .
2301 Collins Avenue , Perry/One Hotel
2901 Collins Avenue , Seville/Edition Hotel
3301 Collins Avenue , Saxony Hotel
3425 Collins Avenue, Versailles Hotel
3651 Collins Avenue , Ocean Grande
4101 Collins Avenue , Crown
4441 Collins Avenue , Fontainebleau Hotel
4585 Collins Avenue , Eden Roc Hotel
Imminent Permit approval pending City
Imminent Permit approval pending City
Imminent Permit approval pending City
Imminent Permit approval pending City
Monetary amount to beachwalk only .
Not started ; may be modified .
Boardwalk exists , not yet permitted for demo .
Boardwalk demo 'd ; beachwalk being installed
Planning Department staff has examined the various segments of the proposed beachwalk , and
has made some preliminary conclusions , as described below .
5
City Commission memo -Boardwalk
May 20, 2013
Page 5 of 6
From 24th Street (starting just north of the Gansevoort/Perry , at Riviera Tower Condo) to 29th Street
Uust south of the Seville, ending at the Triton Towers Condo) the City could propose to keep the
wooden boardwalk if desired , and still maintain connectivity , as there is roadway , Miami Beach
Drive , which is parallel and contiguous to this section of Boardwalk. Bicycle traffic (Aitantic
Greenway Network) could be fairly easily routed from the end of the paved beachwalk at 24th
Street over to Miami Beach Drive. The wooden boardwalk can be retained between 24t h and 29th .
This area is overwhelmingly Condo apartments , and the City would be able to accommodate some
of the residents in this area that like the wooden Boardwalk . It would be a five block stretch of
undisturbed wooden boardwalk that they can walk on, see the ocean , etc .
This plan presupposes that the Perry/One Hotel is permitted to proceed with their pending permit
to remove the section of the boardwalk from behind their property and construct the at-grade
beachwalk. Otherwise , there would be no access to the beginning of Miami Beach Drive at 24th
Street. Staff has been informed that the Collins Park Neighborhood Association has taken a
similar position in favor of connecting the beachwalk to 24th Street and Miami Beach Drive.
For those projects from 29th Street (Seville) north to 36th Street (the Versailles project), it must be
noted that staff is greatly concerned about the legal situation the City may find itself in if the
policies governing the Beachwalk project are suddenly reversed . The Seville , Saxony and
Versailles projects are all pending approval for their projects in the very near future , and will be
delayed significantly if plans need to be revised to reverse policy and scrap the installation of a
beachwalk and the retention of the boardwalk . Staff has prepared a graphic showing that in this
segment, the adjacent land uses are primarily hotels and new hotel/condo projects ; permitting
these previously approved projects to go forward as planned will not affect the large concentration
of apartment residents further north and south. Staff strongly recommends allowing the
beachwalk to proceed in this stretch , in order to avoid the prospect of litigation with these pending
projects , and with the knowledge that this area is primarily hotels and not residential apartments .
North of 36th Street , the Ocean Grande project has proffered a monetary contribution to the
Beachwalk project , but no construction is required. Farther north , the Fontainebleau has also
proffered a beachwalk , but no action on this proffer is imminent. In contrast , the Eden Roc has
already commenced the demolition of the Boardwalk behind their property and the parking lot to
the north. Staff would propose that the Fontainebleau project that has not yet been started be
allowed to be put on hold , while the Eden Roc project , which is underway , be allowed to be
completed.
Regarding future segments to be addressed , it is recommended that a pilot application be
forwarded to the State for the segment from 36th Street to the end of the 47th Street parking lot,
which would reflect the desires expressed previously , i .e. raised to provide better views , some
cushioning substance built in to the materials to provide a softer running surface , and wide enough
to accommodate both walkers and bicycles . Through this mechanism , it can be determined what
the State will permit , as well as allowing further research to arrive at an improved design that
achieves the stated goals . Of course , environmental impacts would need to be assessed as well.
This plan may require additional modifications , however, Planning Department staff believes that it
is a fair compromise. It would permit the group of residents between 24th and 29th to have their
existing wooden boardwalk remain , it would maintain the bicycle connectivity required to implement
the City's long term mobility vision , it would permit the hotel projects to move forward without
requiring major redesigns or sparking litigation , it keeps at least fairly large segments of each
facility without piecemealing it too much , and it would put the longer term possibilities in the hands
6
City Commission memo -Boardwalk
May 20, 2013
Page 6 of6
of the state regulators , and possibly permit us the time to design a more raised beachwalk that
could accommodate walking and biking with a view of the ocean, if possible.
CONCLUSION
The above information is provided for discussion by members of the Commission .
Attachment: map
JGG/JJF/RWS/ESW/RGL
M:\$CMB\CCUPDATES\Land Use and Development Committee\2013\March 20 , 2013\BoardwalkMemo -May 20 2013 .docx
7
Other
Coastal Pathway
-Existing Boardwalk
-Demolished Boardwalk
-Existing Beachwalk
-Commited Beachwalk
-Miami Beach Drive
Triton Tower Condo
Mirasol Ocean
Towers Condo
Oceanfront Plaza Condo
Club Atlantis Condo
EF La nguage School
Royal Club Condo
Traymore Hole!
Riviera Condo
46th St Beach
.• Eden Roc Hotel
Holiday Inn Hotel
Vendome Palace
.condo
'Days Inn Hotel
La Tour Condo
.;
Kin? Richard Condo ...
Best western Hotel
• Clown Hotel
Oa dillac Hotel
Mosaic Condo
Caribbean Condo
Under Development
All Seasons Condo
W~stgate Hotel
"' 351h St Beach
Versailles Hotel
8
,..,
2NE I THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2013
-··-···-····-········-···-·-···-~---....---····· .. ·-··--··--·-·-··-"···"·-----·· .. -----·-·-··
I
-. .
· MIAM -IBEACH -.
, 'CITY .QF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF ·SPECIAL CITY COMMISSION MEETING -: --. . -
NOTiCE IS-' HER-EBY given that the City Comniissinn of the
City of Miami ~each, Florida, will hold a Special City Com~ission
Meeting on Monday, May 20, 2013 at 9:00a.m., at ~he Commission
Chambers, Third Floor, City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive,
Miami Beach, Florida to discuss the City's Boardwalk between
23'd and 46 1h Streets.
All interested parties are invited to attend. Inquiries concerning this item
should be directed to the City Manager's Office, at 305-673:..7010.
Rafael E. Granado , City Clerk
City ·of Miami Beach
To request this material in accessible format, sign language
interpreters, information on access for persons with disabilities, and/
or any accommodation to review any document or participate in any
City-sponsored proceeding , please contact us five days in advance
at 305-673-7 411 (voice) or TIY users may also call the Florida Relay
Service at 711.
Ad# 780
9