Workmen's Compensation_May to December 1976WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 25
Date
(NOT ON AGENDA) recommendation of lump sum 5/5/76
settlement of Workmen's Compensation claim
for $3,835.00 re: Michael Blum v. CMB, Res.
#76-15036 adopted.
Res. #76-15096 adopted, re: recommendation to 7/21/76
settle Workmen's Compensation case of Phillip
Weisz v CMB, for $4,290.00 as lump sum settle-
ment.
Res. #76-15123 adopted, recommendation of 9/1/76
settlement of Workmen's Compensation Claim of
William Matuza v CMB, for $1,365, as lump sum.
Res. #76-15124 adopted, recommendation of 9/1/76
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 26
(continued) Date
settlement of Workmen's Compensation Claim of
Jack Tuttle Hill v CMB, for $1,365, as lump
sum. 9/1/76
Councilman Meyerson requested Administration to 9/15/76
place on 10/6 agenda, for discussion and policy
decision, as well as recommendations of City Mgr.
and City Atty. following matters: 1) Liability
and/or Workmen's compensation insurance for off-
duty policemen; 2) legal representation as re-
quested by Building Inspection Div. during court
appearances; 3) provision for City Prosecutor to
be sworn in by State Atty. to handle City cases
in County Court after Municipal Court is abolished
Jan. 1, 1977,
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 27
Date
Res. #76-15150 adopted, for recommendation of 106176
settlement of Workmen's Compensation claim for
$4,517, as lump sum settlement in case of
Michael Alvarez v City.
Res. #76-15179 adopted, to settle workmen's 11/3/76
compensation claim of David Goldberg v City
for $1,350 as a lump sum settlement.
Res. #76-15211 adopted, to settle Workmen's 12/8/76
Compensation claim of Daniel Resavage v CMB,
for $4,810 as lump sum settlement.
Appearance of Mr. Stephen Slepin, or his rep- 12/8/76
resentative, special counsel for Workmen's