Loading...
CAO 99-08 ~ CITY OF MIAMI BEACH DATE: MAY 14, 1999 TO: SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, CITY MANAGER FROM: .. MURRAY H. DUBBIN, CITY ATTORNEnM CAO #99-8: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CITY EMPLOYEE MERCEDES ROVIROSA SEEKING SIDP FUNDS. ~ RE: Pursuant to your request, I have researched the issue of whether a conflict of interest exists were City of Miami Beach employee Mercedes Rovirosa to receive State Housing Incentive Partnership (SHIP) Program funds. For the reasons stated more fully below, a conflict of interest exists under applicable laws. I. Factua) Bacqround. The City of Miami Beach Community Economic Development Department ("Department") is comprised of three Divisions: 1) Community Development; 2) Housing; and 3) Economic Development. Each Division has its own responsibilities, with the Housing Division in particular administering State Housing Incentive Partnership (SHIP) Program funds. Moreover, the Divisions share filing rooms and common office space within the Department. Entities receiving SHIP funds enter into contracts with the City of Miami Beach concerning operation of Home Ownership Programs, and are thus subject to the continuing regulation of the Department's Housing Division. Miami Beach Community Development Corporation (MBDC) presently operates a Home Ownership Program utilizing SHIP funds. Individuals applying to MBDC for use of these SHIP monies are required, upon the purchase of a home, to execute a second mortgage and assign same to MBDC. Mercedes Rovirosa, employee of the Community Development Division, is interested in applying for SHIP funds. As an employee of the Department, Ms. Rosirosa is privy to information concerning funds administered by said Department, including SHIP funds. II. Leea) Analysis. The State Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees provides in relevant part: .. To: Sergio Rodriguez, City Manager From: Murray H. Dubbin, City Attorney Re: CAO #99-8 Date: . May 14, 1999 Page: 2 \ Conflictine employment or contractual relationship. No public officer or employee of an agency shall have or hold any employment or contractual relationship with any business entity or any agency which is subject to the regulation of, or is doing business with, an agency of which he or she is an officer or employee, . . . nor shall an officer or employee of an agency have or hold any employment or contractual relationship that will create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict between his or her private interests and the performance of his or her public duties where that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his or her public duties. Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida SUttutes. The above-quoted provision prohibits a public employee from having a contractual relationship with a business entity which is either subject to the regulation of its agency I or doing business with its agency. Inasmuch as Ms. Rovirosa's use of SHIP funds would require her to have a contractual relationship with MBDC, an entity which is subject to the regulation of the City and Ms. Rovirosa's agency (the Community Economic Development Department), a prohibited conflict of interest would exist. See, Commission on Ethics Opinion 81- 51 (September 17, 1981), and Commission on Ethics Opinion 78-16 (March 15, 1978). In addition to the above, the second part of Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes, prohibiting a "continuing or frequently recurring conflict" does not require proof that a public employee has failed to perform his responsibilities or has not acted impartially or otherwise acted corruptly -- the Statute is entirely preventative in nature and was created to prevent situations in which private economic considerations may override the faithful discharge of one's public responsibilities. See, Zerweck v. State Commission on Ethics, 409 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Although facts have not been provided substantiating a frequently recurring conflict, the appearance of Ms. Rovirosa's employment within the very Department that administers SHIP funds raises issues pertaining to this conflict of interest proscription. Along these lines, the State Conflict of Interest laws addressing use of certain information states as follows: Disclosure of use of certain information. No public officer, employee of an agency, or local govemment attorney should disclose or use information not available to members of the general public and gained by reason of his or her official position for his or her personal gain or benefit or for the personal gain or benefit of any other person or business entity. 1 "Agency" means any. . . municipal government entity of this state, . . . ; any department, . . . or political subdivision of the state therein; . . . ". Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes. To: Sergio Rodriguez, City Manager From: Murray H. Dubbin, City Attorney Re: CAD #99-8 . Date:' May 14, 1999 Page: 3 Section 112.313(8), Florida Statutes. This conflict of interest provision regards the temptation to disclose or use infomation not available to the general public and gained by reason of one's official position. The issue thus arises of whether by virtue of Ms. Rovirosa's employment with the Department which oversees the Housing Division administering the subject state funds, she is in a position to gain inside information not otherwise available to the general public with regard to said funds. Again, the facts provided do not allow for a proper assessment to be made of whether this prohibition on disclosing certain information has been violated. It is suggested that the City Administration review its policies concerning municipal personnel's involvement in Departmental administration of funds received by the City for eligible citizen participants. cc: Christina M. Cuervo, Assistant City Manager Randolph Marks, Assistant Director, Community/Economic Development Dept. Joanna Revelo, Community Development Division Director Steven Cumbo, Housing Specialist f:Iatto\$a1llshcilalcaosl99-8.cao