File Ref. #101
~CI#IL- LeT /~/-J6jJT 22} /'i9?
RECE\VED
MANDATE FRW CIRCUIT ~~T22 Ar't \0: 58
APPELLATE DIVISI~N",! '''t :r:,'tCS OFF ICE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUI L,.
DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPEALS NO. 98-208AP
WEST BAY PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
and PAUL PHINNEY, Individually
APPELLANT/PETITIONER
vs
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH and THE CITY OF
M I AM I BEACH I-OUS I N3 AUTI-OR I TY
APPELLEE/RESPONDENT
conSideration the Court having Issued Its opinion; .
This cause having been brought to this Court by appeal, and after cue
cause In accordance with the opinion of this COURT attached hereto clnd
YOU ARE HEREBY ODMMANDED that such further prOCeedings be had in sclid
laws of the STATE OF FLORIDA.
IncorpOrated as part of this order, and with the rules Of procedure clnd
Case Number(s) 2627
Appel late DIvisIon of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh JUdicial Circuit of
WITNESS the Honorable Murray Go I ctnan, Actnlnlstrative JUdge of the
Florida and the Seal of the said CircUit Court at Miami, this 18th day of
Septenber, 1998.
HARVEY RUV IN,
Clerk of the Circuit Court of
the Eleventh JUdicial Circuit
In and for Dade County.
1_
By:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES
TO FILE RE-HEARING MOTION,
AND IF FILED DISPOSED OF.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
THE ELEVENTH JUDICIi.L
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
APPELLATE DIVISION
CASE NUMBER: 98-208AP
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER:
2627
WEST BAY PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION and PAUL PHINNEY,
individually,
Petitioner,
vs.
~.:. 1.O -f1
';; cP
.,
.~
',....n
..- .."
~-R.e(X)ROEO
SEP - , '998
Y1 f:...
~
c::
'"
rV
Cf)
., ,
(.;~{
<<;21")
0<:.-.
,
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH and THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH HOUSING
AUTHORITY,
Respondent.
Clal\'; 0\ Ci(cuit
& County Courts
,~ .~.1:.
.-.,....
;-i..:::
o
CP :D
f'oJ c:J
<f\
/
v'.
Opinion filed August 28, 1998.
A Petition for Writ of Certiorari from CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Dade County, Florida.
SANTIAGO D. ECHEMENDIA, ESQ. for petitioner.
JEAN OLIN, ESQ. and CARTER N. McDOWELL, ESQ. for
respondents.
Before STEVE LEVINE, PETER LOPEZ and LESTER LANGER, JJ.
After a review of Petition for Writ of Certiorari it is the
ruling of the majority that said Petition fails to state a
prima facie basis for relief.
PETITION IS DENIED.
COPIES FURNISHED TO COUNSEL
OF RECORD AND TO ANY PARTY
NOT REPRESENTED
OFF REC BK
18256PG0985
PCAWRlr:09/94