Attachment V
!~'TY OF MIAMI BEACH
aT'( HAL!.. 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
pP;\\Ci.miami-beaCh.t1.US
I
I
I
, '
I
I
I
I
r
I
~
-
~
I
L.
I
~
t
J
-
COl\'IMISSION MEMOR-\NDUM NO.
522 ~9 ~
TO:
Mayor Neisen O. Kasdin and
Members of the City Co ission
DATE: July 15, 1998
FROM:
Sergio Rodriguez
City Manager
SUBJECT: A REQUEST FOR DIRECTION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE
PENDING ISSUE RELATED TO THE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS TO BE
COMPLETED AT THE SCOTT RAKOW YOUTH CENTER ICE RINK.
ADMINISTRA TION RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the Mayor and Members of the City Commission review the status report and
provide direction to the Administration as to how to proceed \.Vith the Scott Rakow Youth Center Ice
Rink.
BACKGROUND
On May 20, 1998, the Mayor and City Commission approved schematic plans for the base bids and
base bid budgets for each Parks Bond project, and authorized the Administration to proceed with
construction documents and bid specifications for the aforementioned projects with some exceptions.
One of these was pending on further study of the options for the size and configuration of the Scott
Rakow Youth Center Ice Rink; holding meetings \vith the community for input; and determining
its final size and cost.
ANAL YSIS
As directed by the City Commission, the Administration reviewed this issue as follows:
Issue
Determine the final size and cost of the Scott Rakow Youth Center Ice Rink.
Findings
Throughout the Master Plarming and Schematic Development phases of the parks improvements
program, it has been the Administration's objective to comply with the Commission's directive to
build as large an ice rink as resources would permit. During the data collection phase of the Parks
Master Plan, numerous meetings were held with the community to determine priorities for the Scott
Rakow Youth Center. Two issues clearly stood out as priorities. They were the need for a play field,
and a larger and more efficient ice rink complex with support facilities and a spectator area.
722
AGENDA ITEM 'I- <6A ~
DATE (-15- 9
.
As a direct result of the ice rink discussions, the consultants studied several options for a new ice
rink and developed concepts. These concepts included:
1. Expanding the existing ice rink without encroaching on the Par 3 Golf Course.
2. Enclose the existing multi-purpose coun area and convert to new ice rink.
3. Build a new ice rink complex at the northern end of the youth center facility.
4. Expand the existing ice rink to create a rectangular ice surface, doubling the existing ice area,
and provide for spectator bleachers. This alternative required an encroachment into the Par
3 Go If Course of approximatel y 46' beyond the demising line created by the wall of the pool
area.
At the May 8, 1998, joint meeting of the Finance/Citywide Projects Committee and the
Neighborhoods Committee, the Parks General Obligation Bond Improvemettts prograln was
discussed. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was the joint recommendation of the committees that
the program be forwarded to the Commission, as proposed in the base bid. This package included
the ice rink as proposed in the northeast comer of the facility , with an ice surface of approximatel Y
7,165 sf. designed in a configuration 0 f approximately 65ft. wide by 110ft. long. The exi sting ice
surface now at the youth center is approximately 3,865 sf. The additional 3,300 sf. is an increase of
46% of ice surface over the existing surface.
Prior to the May 20, 1998 directive from the Commission to determine the fInal size and cost of the
Scott Rakow Youth Center Ice Rink, the Administrati on instrUcted the proj ect architects, Carr Smith
Corradino, to again analyze the site to determine what other solutions may be available. Based on
their study, seven additional alternatives were developed. (Please see Attachment A for the
Alternatives). When analyzed, twO of the seven 'vvere further studied.
.
Analysis No.6 proposed an ice surface of 65' x ISO', required a variance of 42'.4" projecting
21'.0" beyond the properly line and approximately 5'-6' from the street edge, eliminated all
interior seating and increased the cost of the ice rink by approximately $238,000 for a total
estimated cost of$I,893,500 including constrUction costs and architectural!engineering fees.
. Analysis No.7 proposed an ice surface of 65' x 130', required a variance of26'.6" projecting
5'.1" beyond the properly line and approximately 20'.0" from the street edge, and the
elimination of all interior seating. The cost would be approximately the same as the
schematic designed concept, for a total estimated cost of S 1,655,500.
The proposed plan for the 65' x 110' rink wo ul d require a 21'.4" variance but would remain wi thiD
the current property line and funding is in place.
On June 29, 1998, a public meeting was held in City Hall to present the original schematic as well
as the tWO alternatives. There were approximately 40 citizens in attendance, comprised primarily
of individuals interested in expanding the ice rink and residents of the area interested in ensuring
the proposed facility did not impact their neighborhood negatively. At the meeting, the consultants
fIrst presented the 65' x 110' concept as included in the schematic plans. The other alternatives were
then presented, followed by an extensive question and answer period. AnalysiS No.6 was deemed
unacceptable to the neighborhood and as too intrusive; and Analysis No.7 was not acceptable to the
residents even though it was less invasive. The meeting concluded with no absolute
recommendation being made as to the size of the ice rink.
723
II
,r;-
~
,II
[I
',~
,~
:-
t'
~
I
;',,:~
I
If.
Recommended Solution(s):
An ice rink v.rith an ice sheet size of 65' x 110' was recommended in the Park Master plan and Bond
Fund program. The same schematic plan was presented and approved at the May 8, 1998, joint
meeting of the Finance/City\\-ide Projects Committee and the Neighborhoods Committees. It was
also presented at the May 20, 1998 Commission meeting. Input from several of the neighborhood
residents who would be impacted by the construction of the new ice rink appeared to indicate that
any rink exceeding 65' x 110' would not be acceptable and be met \\-ith substantial opposition. Based
on the comprehensive evaluation process conducted throughout the Master Plan development and
subsequent schematic development phase of the program and the extensive community input, it is
recommended the 65' x 110' option, as proposed in the schematic plan, be approved. It must be again
stated that this recommended option is vvithin budget and proposed funding and at this point appears
to be acceptable to the impacted neighborhood residents.
11
,
I
~
~
~
~,
I
-'
CONCLUSION:
It is requested that the Mayor and Members of the City Commission review the status report and
provide direction to the Administration as to how to proceed vvith the Scott Rakow Youth Center Ice
Rink.
sJG~/eb
,
T :\AGENDA VUL 1598\REGULAR\ 1 RAKO WIC. WPD
t
!
,:
-
-
J
J
,
v
,i
724
".
ATTACHMENT A
.1
I
I
SCOTT RAKO\V YOUTH CENTER ICE RINK
.~
~
.
Schematic Plan for the Scott Rakmv Youth Center As Presented at
the 5/20 Commission lYleeting.
.
.
,.
.
.
Seven (7) Options for Ice Rink Size/Location Prepared By Carr
Smith Corradino Including Cost Estimates and Impact.
II
r::--;
.
.
j
~
725
~
i
r.:,
~;
~'..
,Ii
~
::J
o
~
~
0,
,Vi
ro
~
~
Co)
--
:...
~
en
.-
Q
-
~
:...
.......
,...
-
C)
u
~
Cl)
~
~
Cl)
u
"0
--
~
C)
en
c:
~
I
en
.......
C
C)
,...
c
C)
;>
o
:..c
0.-2
~ --" ::
~~o
"'0 ~ V)
C) ~ t>
~ ~ ~
0. c:) 0
oZU
:...
~ . .
--
--
o
o
~
c:)
V)
o
E-
-
.....
c.... ::::
.~ 0
...... .-
- --'
=:l ~
~ 5
o c :::: .r---
...... c:) 0 l-.
.5 ~ .~ 53
~tl.OC~~~
C .S .S; 5 ~ .<C:)
:..., :-"- --' -
~ ~ 5 UJ
~.....o~~o
2c:lCc:)~o
c.o.;2 ~ ,~ z c....
::: 0 c-::: "*-f '-'" ......
.~:::: ~ .......0 c:) ~ /::D
en 0 ~ u - .5
'x E- :::: a 2 c...
UJ "'Us CI'J 0.- c:) (l) ~
l-. c: ...... "'2...:::::: c.o u
~eeEC/J~~
UU~oce:ot:
o U :::.- ~
-J c::3 . :: CIJ CIJ -J
o.;2E<~~~
J:~~~zzz
.
.
.
.
.
.
726
.
-
-
.....
.......
o
~
~
en
.......
,...
-
C)
,...
,....
-
C)
;>
o
:...
Cot
,...
:::
~
"0
.-
~
c:.;
en
c:
~
~
C\
\0
.....
n
r-
eo
....
N
~
c
o
.-
......
:: r:::
u
. s; r.=
...... .-
,,"
" 0
<~
c:) ......
U 0
r.=-J
....... OJ
o c'
~~
U l-.
C ~
~c....
1::l (l)
.- --
ciJ a
r>->-J
- -.......
c: 0 '-
:::......0
OCIJ,
I 0
:.:: 0 0
.- ~ l-.
E-O
en
C)
.o-l
c:
C
~
C)
.o-l
-
<
"'0
.-.
'-'
-< .
o
N
C\
.....
r-
'-='
n
-SA-
en
C)
..o...l
c:
r:
~
C)
..o...l
-
-<
"'0
"'0
-<
.
-
~
......
o
~
I
~
o c
z
Z c
<
c::
-a c::
o
< u
a:: ;:
a:: ~
o ~
u ;5
J
I
1!
r-
<.
!
,
r ~
I
. :
- ;
-.
-p.
.- i
-
e
e
e
---
I
.~
I
r-
;.
I
4
~
~
I
.~
-
,
~
II
J
~ ..
J
~ ;
~ ~
.i~
~
J
c_
i
I
, ,
~ '--'
LJ
727
9
--
J
.
,
I
,
.
r
I
fJ
~
i
--
0 0
Z z
-
-0
<:
CC
0 <:: rr:
G' <::
8, C 0
~
U
\__ _ _0_ _ _ _.... _ "J :..', I i
: 1iT~"~,,'--'
r & 11
I '
.1
. -
0--'-
-.;,-
0- --
/", -. I
" . _ _ , I i ,I
"" . ll~f:;- ."/- -':' -'- - I I
" , ... if' ,- - -0- - - - t
,I i' I
_.:( '''',' ,I I : I
/ _ _:--y__ ji
: ,I --,' - -'J:
t J
.: J I .'
,='_; : "." I 1
'~I_ .' _ -,--:~':.-.J I,
_ . _ _ _ _ j ,~I r--'; I I.
--..;=; . ~ i
I I I -.- - :-1;;;' · '
,_ i I _a' . ~2
K: . . i';'--- .1"" : ,!;Z0'i ....,
_._ I' r ~ ! '~.,: " -'I II
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' I: '- t), :-:--v;. I I ':"j ~
___..:", ,;>':.~ I I U' ,: I
1'------" _ ,~ JL I 1 I ;
I =,r-:::---'Z . i I
:r."! ~ i I -"-.- :L. -
I I r ''\,
! l I I '~
"' I ,)
\. .~
~' ;./
,i'
(~;.... _/~:
I~;
o 0 ,-
o
":-,
0- _.-
r
I
r
i
I
I
I
r
I
r
I
I
I
I
r
I
o
o
6
728
- -,0
-- -0
j
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
i
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
I
o
o
o
-I
~I
('
~!
~/
8"
"
"
~
,="
'-"'
(.
o
'='
'-'
""'
'..:..,'
(~)
(~i
!
I ;
_ 12
lj---r:
, !
I i
- i --r=-r= _ 1..8
-1\ ii I'.
~ "'3 I !J !
~'", JiHI,,",
! -:- I -/- v
_ i I
rJ i I
. J : !
· -=-- ----'..-L 3
~
Jl
1.
(:
J;
.~
'! I
I I ,
,I . J
0-n' . '-'-7-'-:~
i i
, .
.i ---.:.
ii I
Iii .:J
0- ----!-.-.-~-lJ--.-
I 'l
i
~
: ~
~
Ii
-------~'7-
, ti
8- -.__._~--___ _._
n ! 1..._1/1 1
Q~i l
0- -'~I~~i'-r'~/ [Ii! ~I -
. ,. " I ~I
-/. . i _ _ I l . 1
~ f rilt ~~ 1- r-r :LJ
~ 'I }-EJ:IJ r-. I
0- -'- - ~,:::ul'l.r'T'LU-;:r t1J7= CJf1':.~t n ~ - - - -- - - - -0
! 'II/ i , i: ' '\
!; ~i~l; \.\
I. :; i l 1'1
\1 1I.t'. l Ii
'~ )1 '? !
"'.' j/
~
1
1
i
o
o
8
o
o
o
2,
729
I
~
0 c J
....
....
z -
c
- <
::.:
0 ::.:
0 -
< u
-
c: .....
c:: :E G
Vl
0 0::
0::
U <
u
-I
~I
rl
~I
~~..
"I-
.., '
C"
u[;
~i'
.1:,
'-"'
11
I
101
I
I
-
I.
I]
I
)
,
0 0
z
Z -
c
<
c::
/'i c::
-- 0
<: u
-
0:: -
!::
cc :::::
Vl
0 ::t:
::t:
, <
, U
i u
I
. ,
.1
.
.
,:
!
. ,
: i
8
n~
: I' : I '
i I
. ,
i i
: 1
en
Z
o
-
. ~ ....
....4
i>
UIII
.c~
"'111
::t
. ~(!)
~Z
.Jt-
aO
'~ ....
...-
0::>>
cXaI
/'
. ,
, ':
i :1 I
:i
I :1 ~
!/ g
!
:i
!I
j
! ~ II
t. ~ ~
.... po
!\l ~
T .. ~
730
II(
..-
I :
-
I
.
I
I
r II
! I
/.
I;
I-
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
(
\
\
\
CEMClfTION OF
EXIS7. BlOG. AREA
\
\
\
\
ALTE~NATE ZAMSONI
t.CCA TICN$
o
I
I
1
I
-0
ENCROACH MEN":' I~O .
EXIST. BUILDING
ENCROACHMENT OVER
PROPERiY LJNE
I
o
I -.
c
8
ANAL YSIS NO. 1
CORRADINO
CITY OF ,1,.1lAMI 8EAC.~
C,J.RR SMlrH CORRAO/NO
':C55 /olW 971h AY(N:;E
1olIAMI. ",0111;).. JJl78
n:l J::5 59~.~7J5
SCCiT ;:AKCI'J CENT::R
A::OI~:~NS &: ;<~fJOVAno~s
731
I I
I '
I
I
fll
I~
I
I '
I
I
.
I
I
.~
:~
j
--
/.
I .
J
,
o
o
6
ANAL YSIS NO.2
CORRADINO
CITY OF MiAMI 3EACH
;.i:'
.Q~'.:~ .
CAIlR SWlno CCRRAClN:>
~~:l "'w "Ift AV"c.NlJt
lol'AUI, I'l.OItIOA .3~17"
m 305.5iil4.07;35
S:OTT RAK::W C:NTE:.~
~OITleIl:S de I!~NOVA TIQIoIS
732
'!.,1'~;~~~
~,_ '001'
':':~"~
OSMOLmON 0,:
EXlST. BlDG. AREA
AJ. TERNA TE ZAMBONI
LOCATIONS
ENCROACHMENT Itr.'O
EXIST. BUILDING
3. EASEMENT
PROPSR1Y UNE
ENCROACI'1MENT OVER
PROPERTY LINE
I
I
I
I
,
,
I .
II
I
I 1-
,
I \\
I . \
I
I
]
I
I
I
i
:
I
-.
I
:11
I
I
,
I
f
I
I
II
I-
Ii CARl! SWI~11 COflRACIWC
~O,~ NoW 8't~ ..\it:.!;;:
W,....., ',-CRIO'" J,31'~
I T!:l. JO'.:'.,O~.3'
'-.
I
;1
:~
'-
l_
Ai. TER....A'rE !AMBON!
\ I.OCAnCN
_ -8
I.
I '"
!r,-
o
o
o
i i
i
I
J
J
~
,
,
J
I
!
I
I,"
. ",t,.;~l.,
;(~ .'
','~
30 EASEMENT
75' X 150'
RINK
I
~
t
\
\ \ \
\ \
~
'\f \
\'
/0
-----~ i
--I. ~ ~
ANAL YSISNO. 3
~ ,
I
CliY OF MiAMI a::.ACH
5::)71 :<AKOW C~"Tt::(
Ar:~I~CNS &: R::,.OVA 710NS
733
]
,
I
---.....-. -.-. ....
-
r
I
- I I .
I I
I i
--
I
I I
I
I
I
, I I
I
~ ( II
I :
~ I
\ I
,
ALTERNATE ZAM80NI I
~ LOCATION i
LINE OF J I
85' X 125' RINK I
r
LINE OF
85' X, 10" RINK ' ,.
PROPERTY UNE
ENCROACHMENT OVER
PROPERTY I.JNE
I
o
-- j
o 0
ANAL YSIS NO.4
CORRADINO
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CAAA Sloll~ COIlRAl)iNO
.055 NW 91th AVENUE
""".11. ~ .CllIO. ';118
Tt~ J~.59..07~
SCOTT RAKOW CENTE~
AOOlnON$ . R~NOV'f.TlONS
734
- .. , . .. "'. . I
"
.
II
~'~
,-
. -
.
:.
~I
i.
i.
:.
.
QI
.
.
jI
.
,.-
M
I:;'
: ',~.~
; ':.:?'
,I
I
I
r
\
\
o
I
I
!
/
I
I .
/
(
\
\
3' E:ASEMENT
r
,
I
6
I
,
6
o
I
6
ANAL YSIS NO.5
CORRADINO
CI TY OF MIA~1! E~ACH
SC~ii WAKCW C::"~~
ACOiil::lNS lie :(::'J::lVAnc~s
735
C:;.;I;? ~:1"J.i eO:lR...oL"O
40~~ N.... il1tl\ AV!::-;\,;!:
..I....:. .~:ll:JO. .3.): 7e
Tt:L. ~~.5g..on5
l
I
l
t
l
I
1
I
,
r
1
I
I
,
J
b
ALTERNATE ZAMBOM
LOCATION
o
. as' X 1~ RJNK
3' EASEMENT
o
ANAL YSIS NO. 6
CORRADJl'JO
ary Of MIAMI BEACH
CARR SWl1K C:0IUUDlfI0
'''0::55 Nfl '7'h A 'lfNUE
.....1oU. fl.~" JJl78
SCtlTT RJ.lCOW a:HlER
ADOna.s ct REHOVA news
736
'.','
:,:;:
~
I
1
r
.!
II
II
f-
Ii
3' EASEMENT
II
I
iI
JI
~
i.
i
,
:1
,
I~
I!
)
\
@
<b
o
o
ANAL YSIS NO. 7
CORRADINO
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CARR SUlTH CORRAf)'NO
4055 NW 97th AIlf:NUE
lollJWl, FlORIDA 33178
TEt. 3OS.S94.01JS
SCOTT RMOW CDlIIR
ADOtnONS ~ R(NQVAllONS
737
~
,
J
Ii
-
-
~
-
11
(
I
I
I
I
I
I,
J! ~~
",. c3 e
~:'~~'';''i" . -5 ~
^' . S8
U' ~;. jj13
." '~~t':i~-' ~ ~ .Ra ~
'~;~~J.:.:~.tf.S, cB ~
"'~";:'.<
.....
d
Z
CI)
on
.z:.
C<I
c::
<c:
80000000000
cg8g8~ 8~
0000C'?C'\l OlD
00 C'?t':lv LO Va')
C":).-.,... co
'P"" _
0000
0000
~~~~
co Cl) 0 I{)
C'? 'P"" I{)
00000000000
8gggo ~88g
oooog C'\l001{)
OCCt':l<?v ICcovC'?
CO?..-,..- to
..- ..-
<0
o
z
'"
c;;
>-
-a
1::
<C
0000
0000
C'\lovCO
OC'?Il.lCC
OCllOIl.l
C'? .... I{)
.0
~
.52
en
.2:::-
as
c
<C
00000000000
gg~~o gg8~
oo(Scsg C\/OOlO
01l.lC?C?"T LOcovO
C")v.,... .....
,..- C'\l
0000
~8~g
gg~:g
CO? 'P"" I{)
v
o
::z
.~
>.
c;;
c::
<
00000000000
8g808 tBggg
0~0~C? C'\l001l.l
o L"JC?"T IOCD-:-O
t':l - _
.... ~
C':)
d
Z
.!!2
'"
f
00000000080
OOOOg 00 0
01{)00 100 0
C'\lC'\l00 C'\l000
"T'P""(')C?~ LOCO"t'-
C?I{) _ C'\l
.... "I
cD
E '"
CUe:
'=0
t6=
<:8-
~~
c:
goooooOOOOO
gg8g8~ ggSS
08gg~~ ~ff:B
C?-,... po..
... -
g~
U) <l)
~"5
c..cn
00800000000
g~oggg .~
OOOO<?N it)
OQC?<?~1t) It)
C'?.....,.. co
..- ..-
e
:fl#.
tIJ
"-
CD
.:.!
8
--l
c:
o
~
o
-i8.e g0~.!1~
O--<Do
8 c::~U)='OU)
> OXOc:"-
Jj~ Q.B...~~~ g
~ oc: oc'O..!:2 CD...O
.Ec:.8..c::ctJ~~':::Oo.s
C:::2een~(.) ~;:::;:S.9
_ .1. m ,:::CD_
B::J(fJ~~=<DCDXO::J
_mNQ..c<Ccwa:
0000
~g~g
coO)o~
C'? ..-1{)
0000
reggs
~c?U;lX)
(?O)~::g
0000
~8S!g
OC?U;CC
COO)OlO
C? .,.. I{)
0000
g~~g
(00)0:8
CO? ,..-U)
c:
E &
c; =cu
~ 00
c4'lE15
CD = CD ::J
8" c en
00
~~
g~
v.....
C'\l
00
C\/ C\/
co en
COC'\l
..... .....
v co
C\/
00
~~
N co
~~
C?
~~
NCO
~~
C?
00
~~
(") C'\l
:g~
(")
~
c
E
E
::J
ct:J
c:
o
==
:e
'0
<(
~
s:
a:
00
~Sl
NeD
~~
C\/
00
~~
*fE
V CO
N
:>..
(.)
c:
<D
C)
c:
~
c:
8
~:s
00
Nt-
Scott Rakow Youth Center
Observations on 3 schemes:
prep~red by Carr Smith Corradino
Schematic Design
Phase Scheme
as presented on
5/20/98
Analysis No.6
Analysis No. 7
Ice Related
Estimated
Cost
$1,655,500.00
Setbacks
Sheridan Avenue
Setbacks
28th Street
21 '4 " Variance Required
(Project v'Yithin Property
Line)
ITa" Variance Required
(Project 3'0" from Property
Line)
$1,835,500.00 42'4" Variance Required 20'0" Variance Required
(Project 21 '0" beyond (Project on Property Line and
Property Line and evacuation of 3'0" easement
approx. 5'0" from street required)
edge)
$1,695,500.00 26'6" Variance Required 20'0" Variance Required
(Project 5'1" beyond (project on Property Line and
Property Line and evacuation of 3'0" easement
approx. 20'0" from street required)
edge)
739
~
I
-
r-
i
"'"'"
-
II
rI