2012-28000 Reso RESOLUTION NO 2012-28000
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
NORMANDY SHORES LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEIGHBORHOOD
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE AD VALOREM
MILLAGE OF 1.1444 MILLS FOR FISCAL YEAR(FY)2012/13 FOR THE
NORMANDY SHORES LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISTRICT, WHICH IS
THIRTEEN AND SEVEN-TENTH PERCENT(13.7%)MORE THAN THE
"ROLLED-BACK" RATE OF 1.0063 MILLS,SUBJECT TO A SECOND
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,
2012 AT 5:02 P.M.
WHEREAS, for the purpose of providing security services within the Normandy Shores
neighborhood area, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 93-2881 on October
20, 1993,which authorized the creation of the Normandy Shores Local Government Neighborhood
Improvement District(District); and
WHEREAS, Section 200.065, Florida Statutes, specifies the method by which
municipalities may fix the operating millage rate and adopt an annual budget for dependent taxing
districts; and
WHEREAS,the maximum millage that can be approved by a simple majority(4/7)vote is
1.0513; anything beyond that requires a 5/7ths vote; and
WHEREAS,on July 18,2012,the City Commission adopted Resolution 2012-27961 which
set the proposed operating millage rate for the District at 1.1478 mills for the purpose of providing
security services within the District; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the July 18,2012 meeting,the millage calculations were further
refined, resulting to a lower millage rate; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, on September 12, 2012, pursuant to Section 200.065 of the
Florida Statues, the City Commission, acting as the Board of Directors of the District, held its first
duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Ad Valorem Millage and Tentative Operating
Budget(FY 2012/13)for the District.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
NORMANDY SHORES LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,
that, following a duly noticed public hearing on September 12,2012,the Board hereby adopts the
Tentative Operating Millage rate of 1.1444 mills for the District for FY 2012/13,which is thirteen and
seven-tenth percent(13.7%)more than the"Rolled-back"rate of 1.0063 mills, subject to a second
public hearing scheduled on Thursday, September 27, 2012, at 5:02 P.M.
SED and ADOPTED this 12th day of September 2012.
Chair4on of the District
APPROVED AS TO
INCORP FORM &LANGUAGE
ORATE &FOR EXECUTION
to •1 District
26 tZ
City At orney D to
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
A resolution of the Board Of Directors of The Normandy Shores Local Government
Neighborhood Improvement District adopting the tentative Ad Valorem Millage Rate Of 1.1444
Mills For The Normandy Shores Neighborhood Improvement District, which is thirteen and
seven-tenth(13.7%)more than the"rolled-back"rate of 1.0063 mills,subject to a second public
hearing scheduled on Thursday, September 27, 2012 At 5:02 P.M.
Key Intended Outcome Supported:
Increase visibility of police; Maintain crime rates at or below national trends.
Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.):
In 2009 Community Survey, both residents and businesses reported the following areas for the
City to address in an effort to improve public safety:
• Preventing crime (Residents: 44.9%, Business: 43.9%)
Issue:
Shall the Mayor and City Commission, acting in its capacity as the Board of Directors for the
Normandy Shores Local Government Neighborhood Improvement District, adopt the attached
resolution which sets the tentative Ad Valorem Millage Rate; the Calculated Rolled-Back Rate;
and sets the date, time and place for the second public hearing?
Item Summa /Recommendation:
The proposed ad valorem millage recommended by the Administration is 1.1444 mills to provide
the current level of security required by this district. For the Normandy Shores taxing District,the
value for each mill($1.00 of ad valorem tax for each$1,000 of property value)is determined by
the 2012 Certification of Taxable Value and has been set at$112,393. Florida Statutes permit a
discount of up to five percent for early payment discounts,delinquencies,etc. Therefore,the 95
percent value of the mill is$106,773. The 1.1444 mills will generate proceeds of$122,200, 65
percent of the proposed district budget. In addition, the City of Miami Beach General Fund is
required to provide 35%of the total operating expenditures($65,800). The City has funded the
35% for each of the nineteen years since the District was established.
The increase of 0.0509 mills from the prior year millage represents an annual increase of$14.53
to the City average 2012 homesteaded property of$285,517 taxable value(estimate based on
Ad Valorem Assessment Roll as of January,2011),which is due to maintenance of homeowner-
requested cameras and security gates,the estimated impact of the living wage ordinance on the
security contract expenses, and Property Management charges primarily due to personnel
increases. The total levy to the average homeowner is $327 per year($27 per month).
The FY 2012/13 proposed millage rate is above the maximum millage rate of 1.0513 allowed to
be adopted by a majority vote, and will therefore require a 5/7 vote.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
N/A 2
OBPI Total
Financial Impact Summary:
City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:
Sign-Offs:
Department Director Assistant City Manager City ger
AGENDA ITEM n 7 8 J
C H
DATE /
MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beath, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,wvvw.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Kathie G. Brooks, Interim City Manager Z.
DATE: September 12, 2012
SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE NORMANDY
SHORES LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE AD VALOREM MILLAGE OF 1.1444
MILLS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2012/13 FOR THE NORMANDY SHORES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISTRICT, WHICH IS THIRTEEN AND SEVEN-
TENTH PERCENT (13.7%) MORE THAN THE "ROLLED-BACK" RATE OF
1.0063 MILLS SUBJECT TO A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED ON
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 AT 5:02 P.M.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission,acting in its capacity
as the Board of Directors for the Normandy Shores Local Government Neighborhood
Improvement District, adopt the attached resolution which sets the following:
1) The tentatively adopted millage rate of the Normandy Shores Neighborhood
Improvement District for FY 2012/13:
General Operating 1.1444 mills (1.0935 mills last year)
2) The tentatively adopted millage rate of 1.1444 mills is 13.7%more than the
"Rolled-Back" Rate of 1.0063 mills
3) The second public hearing to consider the final Normandy Shores
Neighborhood Improvement District operating millage rate and tentative
budget for FY 2012/13 shall be held on Thursday, September 27 2012 at
5:02 P.M., in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, 1700 Convention
Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida.
BACKGROUND
The Normandy Shores Local Government Neighborhood Improvement Distract(the District),
a dependent taxing district of its principal,the City of Miami Beach,was established in 1994
to provide continual 24-hour security to this gated community; FY 2012/13 represents its
nineteenth year of operation.
FY 2012/13 Normandy Shores Tentative Millage Rate
September 12, 2012
Page 2 of 3
The District was established by Ordinance 93-2881, and has the authority "to levy an ad-
valorem tax on real and personal property of up to two mills, provided that no parcel of
property will be assessed more than $500 annually for such improvements" During FY
1998/99 the amount of annual funding to be provided by the City and the dependent status
of the District were issues discussed by the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee. A
determination was reached that the City would fund 35%of the annual cost of the operation
of the community gate guard. This cost will eventually be funded from the golf course
operation of the Normandy Shores Golf Course. It was further agreed that the City would
continue to supplement the District at current levels until the Golf Course assumes the cost.
On August 29, 2002, the Administration met with the Normandy Shores.Local Government
Neighborhood Improvement District representatives and agreed to eliminate the$500 cap.
on the highest valued home in the District. The enabling legislation was adopted by the
Commission on September 25, 2002. This ensures that the City's contribution from the
General Fund remains at 35% of the operating budget of the District.
PROCEDURE
The operating millage and budget for this dependent special taxing district must be adopted
in accordance with Florida Statutes. This procedure requires that this Resolution be
considered immediately after the millage and budget of the principal taxing authority, i.e.,
City of Miami Beach.
It also prescribes that a tentative millage be adopted first.This is accomplished by adopting
a Resolution which states the percent increase or decrease over the"Rolled-back"rate,and
the date, time, and place of the second public hearing scheduled to adopt the final millage.
Following this, another Resolution which tentatively adopts the Normandy Shores District
operating budget must be approved. (See accompanying District Budget Agenda item for
details).
The statute requires the name of the taxing authority, the rolled-back rate, the percentage
increase,,and the millage rate be publicly announced. before adoption of the millage
resolution.
ANALYSIS
On July 1,2012,the City received the 2012 Certification of Taxable Value from the Property
Appraiser's Office stating that the taxable value for Normandy Shores is $112,393,414,
which includes a reduction of$283,196 for construction, renovation, etc. The preliminary
value represents an increase of$7,981,561 from the July 1, 2011 Certification of taxable
Value of$104,411,853(7.6 percent)and an increase of 8.4 percent over 2011's July 2011
value of$103,688,864.
The proposed ad valorem millage recommended by the Administration is 1.1444 mills to
provide the current level of security required by this district. This tax levy will generate
proceeds of $122,200. The increase of 0.0509 mills from the prior year millage, due to
maintenance of homeowner-requested cameras and security gates,the estimated impact of
the living wage ordinance on the security contract expenses, and Property Management
charges primarily due to personnel increases, represents an annual increase of$14.53 to
the City average 2012 homesteaded property of$285,517 taxable value(estimate based on
Ad Valorem Assessment Roll as of January, 2011), and a total of approximately$327 per
year($27 per month).
FY 2012/13 Normandy Shores Tentative Millage Rate
September 12, 2012
Page 3 of 3
For the Normandy Shores taxing District,the value for each mill($1.00 of ad valorem tax for
each$1,000 of property value)is determined by the 2012 Certification of Taxable Value and
has been set at$112,393. Florida Statutes permit a discount of up to five percent for early
payment discounts, delinquencies, etc. Therefore, the 95 percent value of the mill is
$106,773. The required millage without the homeowner-requested additional security
camera maintenance and the living wage increase is 1.0592 (0.0343 mills below the FY
2011/12 rate). The proposed millage of 1.1444 is required to generate$122,200 in property
tax revenues by the district.
The rolled-back rate is the millage rate required to produce the same level of property tax
revenue in FY 2012/13 as collected in FY 2011/12. The rate is calculated as 1.0063 or
0.0872 mills less than the millage rate adopted for FY 2011/12.
Further, pursuant to State Statute,the City may elect to approve millage rates above the roll-
back rate up to the constitutional cap of 10 mills subject to the following votes by the
Commission or referendum:
• Option I: A majority of the approval of the Commission Millage is required to approve a
millage up to 1.0513 (equivalent to.a 4.47% increase in Property Tax revenues). The
4.47% increase is the state per capita personal income gain for the prior calendar year.
• Option 11:A two-thirds approval(5 of 7 votes)of the Commission is required to approve a
millage up to 1.1564 (equivalent to a 10% increase in Property Tax revenues above
Option 1).
• Option III: A unanimous approval of the Commission or referendum is required to
approve a millage above 1.1564 mills
The proposed rate of 1.1444 requires therefore a two-thirds approval (5 of 7 votes)of the
Commission.
It must be noted that in accordance with State Statute,there is a 10 mill operating cap which
cannot be exceeded without voter approval. Combining both millages from the dependent
district (1.1444) and the principal taxing authority (6.1122) totals 7.2566 mills, which is
2.7434 mills less than the 10 mill cap.
CONCLUSION
The City Commission, acting in its capacity as the Board of Directors of the District, should
adopt the attached Resolution which establishes a tentative millage and schedules the
second and final public hearing.
� D
W
2;
Q i
f
W
2
H
_.-. .
y r (h CC O) C (n C (L) i Q)
:2' U co r O c co ° a) o _0 o C
a�i can LL L) c c N�' O > ca
a 0] y N � 3 c) v m a) >
> a) c.�
.� O O C (� C p W I
r�0 a) N N 'rU O >,C i .O c
cu N _O �— QO ±= cn
CQ O _)LL 'U U Q 1] >
D O W N > C r O cU 'O
i L E a) �_
U Q W �' U i (U 00 L E i= (n
O U ��- U m U t7
a)LL cn cn E O-o ° a)� cu
o a S � X�i� ° o u� °C
ca) O LL a� °
�p U- O' U cu a) c Q°
o _ W� i2 Y _0 p)Q)L L a)
E c LL S o __U U 7 U M w- N
��/A� E p Llj U) r Lo C a) > a) p O a
VJ U a) °rL C aL > C U
> p (3p m- O UL ° U c
>_ m p� ns U- ° o ° Ca —0 0) cu m
Z U pZ m w Lo r c_° c m :r a)cu>, ° 0
a Q Cl w a c>a s c cu co i
a) (n > -a•C O E C3 _u +' a) O o cu _ a T
,�
Q �U Q wQ aci �� a) W �} c�
ui
p ° �m
— - a)
° 0 -Z6 -0 �i n V > O W 0EE v �C a
�o E � �o a) o C
U.J
Q m o J ) � �
U � a)� n `
aCU
^D^ _0 ti p O c O C c M -0 C C a C lz (4
CL a)r W pm E 6O•cr w O a O�
LL C _ U) W= t . C U p c'7 >,U i
T p
- C O C
O® w 0 aU O �LL O
V �U a- CC a `� a ° >.E U CZ U
°'o w Ww .rU cs U a 3� a 0)a�
2 a) cu CY)O
CU LL'C ~ F-Z •a *-.0 N O 70 N `O } O N
L Z> m �`m a � a Z c Qa) E o E� o o o ° E O o , o �vmc CL OO '- ) a)Q > 0 O 0-1 .2 0 � N ° cu
CL-0 p2 pQ a m :5-a
au>),
C z O pm O +° w o 'o i U c
a)> o (D O Ln a Q— a) o
L >
^' cn O W Q W W o f a) cn _
C:>! N 2 =_O +, . C/)C) . o N Es a) ca .m ° a)
_O C O -a
U O —.2
U cA �..
N W E O J LL N 'W 0 0 0 Q) +� CO O
cU.
I WUN m0 m� a�i Q � N c° v�---°-, O E �r
= a)T- W Z L d - (nr M U) C: , - Of`
Q� ��' a) �U �-� �+C.> a) OL O ) OC Bch
c� W cn CC E I-"'�" �- +'" E L u) E r-
oj U ui n) o.�� a�z W CC. U Np o -ro~ o a�Cq
N 'c Q rW� NWW '-'aC Z0 a) i Nc7 ft
D' O o a) Q20 X22 6 F--o o a)-0 � .ru > m o v.
Z LL cn cri F-LL Lo H H. �.. ?.,cu U U cu E cu > ►- cu ca Q
IL
WI
t'
�I