Loading...
2016-29557 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2016-29557 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") has proposed an Ordinance creating workforce housing requirements for all new residential developments larger than 20 units, and redevelopment or renovation projects that increase a residential building's net square footage by 50% or more, or that add 20 or more units; imposing mandatory density bonuses; and requiring the payment of a fee in lieu of providing workforce housing units (the "Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, the Ordinance is scheduled to be heard by the Board's Metropolitan Services Committee on September 13, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City is dedicated to encouraging the development of workforce housing in Miami Beach; however, the City has concerns with regard to the unique impacts of the Ordinance on the City; and WHEREAS, City Charter Section 1.03(c) prohibits any increase in floor area ratio ("FAR") as it existed on November 7, 2001, unless such increase is approved by a majority of the City's voters; and WHEREAS, to the extent that the proposed density bonuses would result in an increase in FAR or, alternatively, extreme reductions in unit size, the Ordinance could potentially conflict with the City Charter, Code, and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, if the Board intends for density bonuses to include FAR bonuses, then the Ordinance would directly conflict with the City Charter; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance also requires that developers pay a fee to the County in lieu of providing workforce housing units, which fee would be deposited into a County housing fund; and WHEREAS, as presently drafted, the Ordinance provides no assurance that that fees in lieu of providing workforce housing units will be dedicated to workforce housing projects in Miami Beach, which could result in the City subsiding workforce housing elsewhere in the County, without receiving a benefit for City residents or individuals who work in Miami Beach; and • WHEREAS, under the direction of the Mayor and City Commission, the City has been working diligently for the past year to encourage the development of workforce housing in Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, the Miami-Dade County League of Cities has prepared detailed comments to the Ordinance, which comments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City would like additional time to review the Ordinance and discuss its potential impact with the County; and WHEREAS, the City hereby urges the Board to defer consideration of the Ordinance, due to the City's material concerns as to the Ordinance's application and timing; and WHEREAS, if the Ordinance is not deferred, the City hereby urges the Board to extend the period for municipalities to opt out of the Ordinance from 90 days to 180 days, to allow the City additional time to prepare and submit its opt-out request, given the City's material concerns. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby transmit to the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") the City's preliminary comments with regard to the proposed County Workforce Housing Ordinance (the "Ordinance"), urge the Board to defer consideration of the Ordinance due to the City's material concerns as to the Ordinance's application and timing, and, in the alternative, urge the Board to extend the opt- out period from 90 days to 180 days, to allow the City additional time to opt out from the application of the ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 V day of SP fee weber , 2016. 1 ilip Levine s` or '' ..�'�•�""� ' I NCORPIOAATEI3q Rafael E. Granad• � City Clerk 4*4.41,gCH FORM & LANGUAGE F:\ATTO\KALN\RESOLUTIONS\Deferral of County Wol'f�? �iv:%-Reso.docx & FOR EXECUTION- i� City Attorney ate lv� 9.2.16 Proposed Amendment to County's Workforce Housing Ordinance Revise Section 33-193.7(A) to read as follows: (A) Applicability to municipalities. Pursuant to Sections 1.01(A)(18) and 6.02 of the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter, this ordinance does not create a minimum standard for municipalities. Municipalities shall address the need for workforce housing within their respective territorial jurisdictions in the following manner: 1. Exemptions. The following municipalities are exempt from and not subject to the requirements of this ordinance: a. Any municipality whose population is 10,000 or less according to the latest decennial census. b. Any municipality which, as of the effective date of this ordinance, has in place mandatory or voluntary comprehensive plan or land development code provisions that authorize increased densities in exchange for the provision of workforce or affordable housing. c. Any municipality that is otherwise exempt from the requirements of this ordinance may choose to adopt a workforce housing development program at any time by adopting an ordinance in accordance with Section 166.041(3)(c), Fla. Stat., that proportionately adapts the density bonuses to its municipal land use designations and zoning districts.1 The County shall indemnify and defend from challenge any municipality that adopts a program reliant on the County's ordinance. 2. Non-exempt municipalities. As to other municipalities, each municipality shall adopt: a. a resolution making legislative findings demonstrating that the need for workforce housing within its territorial jurisdiction is being adequately addressed, or that workforce housing would be impractical to provide due to issues such as but not limited to the lack of availability or high value of vacant land or redevelopment sites; or b. its own voluntary or mandatory workforce housing development program reliant on its own legislative findings; or c. the Workforce Housing Development Program set forth in this article, proportionately adapting the density bonuses to apply to its municipal land use designations and zoning districts,2 in which case the County shall indemnify and defend that municipality from challenge. I Remaining Issue: Adding requirements for how the revenues from the fees collected in lieu of workforce units will be spent,so that it benefits the area of the County from which the money is collected. 2 Remaining Issue: Adding requirements for how the revenues from the fees collected in lieu of workforce units will be spent,so that it benefits the area of the County from which the money is collected. 1 Exkk A" 9.2.16 3. Time to comply. a. Each municipality that is subject to the requirements of this section shall have until April 30, 2017, within which to adopt a resolution making findings as to the need for or practicality of providing workforce housing within its territorial jurisdiction, and indicating whether or not it intends to adopt a voluntary or mandatory workforce housing program, or already has such a program. b. Each municipality that adopts a resolution indicating that it will adopt a voluntary or mandatory workforce housing program shall have until October 31, 2017, within which to adopt any ordinance or resolution necessary to address its need for workforce housing. c. Applicability to municipalities incorporated after the effective date of this ordinance and to municipalities that reach a population that exceeds 10,000 as evidenced by publication of a future decennial census: i. Such municipality shall have 6 months, from the date of incorporation or the date of publication of census as applicable, within which to adopt a resolution making findings as to the need for or practicality of providing workforce housing within its territorial jurisdiction, and indicating whether or not it intends to adopt a voluntary or mandatory workforce housing program. ii. If it adopts a resolution indicating that it will adopt a voluntary or mandatory workforce housing program, such municipality will have another 6 months within which to adopt any ordinance or resolution necessary to address its need for workforce housing. d. Within 45 days of adopting any ordinance or resolution meeting the requirements of this section, each municipality shall send a copy of such ordinance or resolution to the Director of the County's Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources. 4. Deference to municipal findings. The County shall defer to all legislative findings in any municipality's resolution or ordinance addressing workforce housing, including without limitation its determination of the amount of workforce housing presently available and whether it is deficient, the need for future workforce housing if any, the availability and value of land, the manner in which municipalities may address the need for workforce housing, and whether providing workforce housing is impractical due to issues such as but not limited to the lack of availability or high value of vacant land or redevelopment sites. The County shall also defer to a municipality's legal interpretations in the adoption and implementation of any resolution or ordinance related to workforce housing. The County shall not take adverse action against a municipality based on its disagreement with findings made pursuant to this ordinance. 5. Interpretation. This section shall not be construed to require a municipality: a. to violate its charter, code of ordinances, or comprehensive plan; 2 9.2.16 b. to modify or amend its charter or comprehensive plan or a Development of Regional Impact development order; or c. to modify or amend its land development regulations where such amendment would require a referendum. 6. Approval processes. a. The site plan approval and other administrative processes described herein are intended to apply only to the unincorporated area. Municipalities shall either establish their own procedures or utilize their existing procedures for approving development pursuant to their workforce housing program, if any. b. Municipalities shall also establish their own procedures for administering any required declarations of restrictive covenants or workforce housing agreements related to their workforce housing program, if any. 7. Municipal use of County staff resources. a. The County shall make the staff resources of its Department of Regulation and Economic Resources available upon request to assist municipalities in gathering and analyzing data, and adopting municipal workforce housing ordinances, but may charge a reasonable fee as set forth in an implementing order adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. b. Municipalities may, through an interlocal agreement, arrange for any required declarations of restrictive covenants or workforce housing agreements related to their workforce housing program to be administered by the Miami-Dade County Public Housing and Community Development Department or successor department, pursuant to Chapter 17, Article IX of this code. 8. Effect of compliance. After the effective date of this ordinance, a municipality that adopts either its own voluntary or mandatory workforce housing development program or a resolution making legislative findings, and has provided a copy of it to the County as provided herein, shall not thereafter be subject to any other provision of this ordinance. 3 Resolutions - C7 Al MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: September 14, 2016 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. RECOMMENDATION The Adminstration recommends approval of the Resolution. ANALYSIS Miami-Dade County Commissioner Barbara Jordan has brought forward a proposed ordinance making inclusionary zoning for workforce housing mandatory for all developments with more than 20 units and redevelopment/renovation projects that increase the structure's net square footage by 50 percent or more or add 20 or more units. The proposed ordinance requires that a minimum of 10 percent of these new units be designated for workforce housing (serving households earning up to 140 percent of Area Median Income [AMI]). Developers meeting this threshold will receive a 15 percent density bonus over the density allowed by the County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). If the developer exceeds the minimum number of workforce units, the density bonus increases proportionately as follows: WHU Set-Aside Density Bonus Types of Set-Aside 10% 15% Mandatory 11% 16% Bonus 12% 17% Bonus 13% 18% Bonus 14% 19% Bonus 15% 20% Bonus 16% 21% Bonus 17% 22% Bonus Page 677 of 2277 18% 23% Bonus 19% 24% Bonus 20% 25% Bonus It should be noted that, under the proposed ordinance, the developer has the option of providing the required workforce units at an alternate site located within one (1) mile of the development. The developer also has the alternate option of paying a fee in lieu of units (currently $205,000 per unit but subject to annual adjustment by the County). These funds would be deposited in the County's housing program without provision as to what areas the funds would be used. Furthermore, the developed workforce units must be maintained and operated as such for a period of 20 years. (If the property ownership is transferred within the initial 20-year period, a new 20-year period commences.) The proposed ordinance provides an opportunity for municipalities to opt out of its provisions if the following terms are met: 1. The municipality "adopt(s) an ordinance addressing the need for workforce housing within its territorial jurisdiction... accompanied by data and analysis considering the need ... and demonstrating that the ordinance will address the identified needs; and 2. "Municipalities shall have 90 days from the effective date ... to adopt a workforce housing ordinance that complies with the minimum standards set forth." The Administration has these specific concerns regarding the proposed ordinance: * The Ordinance doesn't recognize the City's Charter provision on FAR vis a vis its proposed density bonus; * The alternative—which is a monetary contribution by developers—goes into a County fund without guarantee that funds contributed by our City will be used to provide workforce housing in our community. In theory, the City could be subsidizing workforce housing elsewhere in the County while not receiving any benefit; and * Since each community is impacting differently with varying influencing factors, the same approach may not work well in all communities -- especially our own. As such, we may wish to explore the ordinance's Opt Out provision. For the past year, the City Commission has worked with staff to establish a strategic plan that incentivizes the development of workforce housing in our community. These steps began at the May 6, 2015 Commission meeting with the approval of use of the then recently-acquired Barclay Plaza Apartments for workforce housing serving households earning 120 to 140 percent AMI. Further, the Commission agreed to issue a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for a consultant to assist the City in drafting Request For Proposals (RFP) for private development not only of the Barclay Plaza Apartments but of other City-owned sites that may potentially be suitable for the inclusion of residential development. The Commission further established its commitment to workforce housing with the passage of Resolution 2016-29355 which accepted the recommendation of the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee to "pursue new garage development initiatives including the incorporation of workforce housing" at multiple sites throughout our community. The City's Land Use Committee offered a series of recommendations to incentivize workforce housing. The matrix below compares the Committee's recommendations with those in the County's ordinance: Workforce Housing Incentive Matrix Municipality Type of Incentive Incentives Page 678 of 2277 Amend the definition of workforce housing to include those earning 80%to @R' Administrative 140%of AMI Create a deed restriction program to preserve affordability for properties Encouragement of mixed-income housing through positive marketing efforts Promote education and outreach to developers to understand the incentives Research the possibility for short-term tax abatement for new projects { Utilize City-owned properties, including garages,to develop workforce housing Impact fee deferral/restructuring so that developers don't have to pay until the Development unit is actually occupied by a qualified household Reimbursement of impact fees using funds collected from market rate and commercial projects Extending existing benefits(Streamlining the approval and permitting process and provide priority in scheduling and reviewing) Provide financial assistance(Incentives such as those offered to"green" housing developments for ex. Refund application and review fees by General Fund to Building Department) Zoning Amend setback requirements-depending on the project and neighborhood Density bonuses offered in exchange for workforce housing if no FAR increase is considered lAcro-housing-reducing unit size requirements tvlxed tenant projects 'Reduce or remove parking requirements for workforce housing county j Administrative 'Workforce Housing definition includes those earning 60%to 140%of AMI Zoning !Mandatory over 20 dwelling units ;Voluntary under 20 dwelling units Payment in Lieu of Development Combination of Units and Payment in Lieu More so, the City has asserted its commitment to expanding affordable housing via its joint application with the County and the City of Miami for the Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities Challenge (100RC). In our application to 100RC, the City identified its stressors as sea level rise, coastal erosion, transportation, poverty, and lack of affordable housing. Having been selected to join the 100RC network in May, our planning efforts in support of this initiative begin at the end of September. As these efforts demonstrate, the City is committed to promoting the development of workforce housing. While the intent of the County's proposed ordinance is commendable and we recognize the need for such housing, our community's unique circumstances pose challenges in its implementation. As a land-locked City that is practically fully developed and surrounded by historic districts whose architectural integrity is intertwined with our tourist economy, the physical nature of our community renders the standards in this ordinance as impossible. However, the County's presentation of the proposed ordinance has occurred while the City was recessed for the summer. As such, we have been unable to engage the community and explore intergovernmental collaboration as it relates to its potential impact. Therefore, we request that the Mayor and Commission seek a formal extension of time to comply with the ordinance to enable the Page 679 of 2277 Administration to engage the community and fully vet the proposed ordinance's impact and the possibility of the City's pursuing its own ordinance under its Opt Out provision. CONCLUSION The proposed County workforce housing ordinance, while well-intentioned poses significant concerns for the City including: * Its failure recognize the City's Charter provision on FAR vis a vis its proposed density bonus; * The payment in lieu of units alternative does not guarantee that funds contributed by our City will be used to provide workforce housing in our community; and * Our City would be best served by crafting its own workforce housing ordinance that incorporates our community's unique circumstances and should, therefore, exercise the Opt Out provision of the County's ordinance. However, the County ordinance only allows ninety(90) days to exercise the Opt Out provision and the City would need one hundred eighty (180) days. The City would need an extension of time in order to comply with the County's ordinance. The Administration recommends that the Mayor and Commission request a deferral from the County before the ordinance's passage on second reading in October providing for additional time to address concerns it has with the proposed ordinance. If unsuccessful in deferring its passage, the City should request an extension of time to comply with the Opt Out provision of the ordinance from the currently proposed ninety(90) days to one hundred eighty (180) days. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure Workforce Housing For Key Industry Workers Is Available In Suitable Locations FINANCIAL INFORMATION N/A Legislative Tracking Housing and Community Services ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution ❑ Proposed County Workforce Ordinance Page 680 of 2277 MEMORANDUM Agenda Item No. 4(J) TO: Honorable Chairman Jean Monestime DATE: June 7, 2016 and Members, Board of County Commissioners FROM: Abigail Price-Williams SUBJECT: Ordinance relating to zoning, County Attorney housing, and impact fees; creating mandatory Workforce Housing Development Program; amending requirements for workforce housing units and modifying density bonus and development intensity standards; amending requirements for declarations of restrictive covenants regarding workforce housing units; providing for deferral of road impact fees for development of workforce housing units; amending eligibility requirements relating to Workforce Housing Development Program administration; amending Article XIIA of Chapter 33,Article IX of Chapter 17, and sections 33E-6.I and 33E-18 of the Code • The accompanying ordinance was prepared and placed on the agenda at the request of Prime Sponsor Commissioner Barbara J. Jordan. 1�,1 lti: , . 1 ' ' L Abiga ri' Wi lams .4" County Att 4 ey APW/snun Page 686k 2277 r'�dc .ba • �' ,' MEMORANDUM (Revised) TO: Honorable Chairman Jean Monestime DATE: June 7, 2016 and Members,Board of County Commissioners i FROM: gal �rzce- i i. SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 4(J) Coun •ttomey Please note any items checked. / "3-Day Rule"for committees applicable if raised V 6 weeks required between first reading and public hearing 4 weeks notification to municipal officials required prior to public hearing Decreases revenues or increases expenditures without balancing budget Budget required Statement of fiscal impact required Statement of social equity required Ordinance creating a new board requires detailed County Mayor's report for public hearing No committee review A pp licable legislation requires more than a majority vote(i.e.,2/3' s , 3/5's , unanimous ) to approve Current information regarding funding source,index code and available balance,and available capacity(if debt is contemplated) required Page 66T"of 2277 Approved Mayor Agenda Item No. 4(J) Veto 6-7-16 Override ORDINANCE NO. ORDNANCE RELATING TO ZONING, HOUSING, AND IMPACT FEES; CREATING MANDATORY WORKFORCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM; AMENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS AND MODIFYING DENSITY BONUS AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS; AMENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR DECLARATIONS OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS REGARDING WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS; PROVIDING FOR DEFERRAL OF ROAD IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS; AMENDING ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO WORKFORCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION; AMENDING ARTICLE XIIA OF CHAPTER 33, ARTICLE IX OF CHAPTER 17, AND SECTIONS 33E-6.1 AND 33E-18 OF THE CODE OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA: Section 1. Chapter 33, Article XXIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows:1 ARTICLE XIIA. -WORKFORCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Sec.33-193.3. -Short title. This article shall be known as the "Workforce Housing Development Program of Miami-Dade County,Florida." Words stricken through and/or [[double bracketed]] shall be deleted. Words underscored and/or >>double arrowed<< constitute the amendment proposed. Remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Page 688f 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 2 Sec. 33-1.93.4. -Legislative intent, findings, and purpose. A. Need for workforce housing in Miami-Dade County. The health, safety, and welfare of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County depend on the availability of a range of housing choices affordable to persons and families of all income levels in all areas of Miami-Dade County >>in both the incorporated and unincorporated areas<<. [[Current]] >>As of 2007, when the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 07-05 to establish a voluntary workforce housing development program ("WHU program" or Workforce Housing Development Program"),<< patterns of development [[have]] >>had<< resulted in a persistent shortage of housing for certain sectors of the community. >>Since then, the shortage has increased.<< Studies of market demand show that [[for the foreseeable future more than 50% of the new]] >>the<< labor force in Miami-Dade County [[will]] >>continues to<< require moderately priced housing units. Currently, there exists in Miami-Dade County a shortage of housing affordable to individuals and families of moderate incomes, particularly those whose earnings range from >>60 percent up<< [[6-5-%]] to 140[[°x]]»percent« of the County's median income, the "workforce target income group." The workforce target income group includes many public employees and others employed in key occupations that support the local community. Increasingly, the high cost and short supply of housing affordable to persons and families of moderate income mean that many employees in the workforce target income group cannot afford to live in Miami-Dade County, while others can only afford to live in areas-concentrated according to price and income level. The uneven distribution of moderately-priced housing results in additional stratification of housing according to price and income level. It is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County to reduce or eliminate such economic stratification by adopting land use regulations that encourage development of land available for residential use in Miami-Dade County in a manner that emphasizes integration of new housing for individuals and families in the workforce target income group into new, expanding, or redeveloping neighborhoods. Page 68V 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 3 The uneven geographic distribution of housing affordable to the workforce target income group, as well as the distance between jobs and available housing, also increase traffic congestion and decrease economic productivity. Traffic and roadway congestion in tan adversely affect the environment and diminish air quality, increasing the burden on the public health care system and resulting in rising health care costs. The public health, safety, and welfare of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County can best be protected by adopting land use policies to ensure that housing affordable to the workforce target income group is distributed throughout the county near workplaces, rather than being concentrated in enclaves separate from jobs and higher-priced housing. The Florida Growth Management Act requires Miami-Dade County to adopt a comprehensive plan to guide future development and growth, including a housing element consisting of standards,plans, and principles to be followed in the provision of housing for all current and anticipated future residents. Exercising the authority conferred by the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter, and in furtherance of the Growth Management Act, the Board of County Commissioners has adopted the Comprehensive Development Master Plan ("CDMP"), including a housing element which establishes goals, objectives, and policies to ensure the provision of all variations of affordable housing products to meet the spatial and economic necessities of all current and future residents regardless of household type or income. B. Causes and consequences of lack of sufficient workforce housing supply. In order to assess the extent of the housing shortage, identify the most severely affected sectors of the community, and ascertain the need for a workforce housing development program,the Board of County Commissioners established a task force consisting of county housing, zoning, and planning professionals, and representatives of the private, for-profit, development community. The mission of the task force was to analyze the current and anticipated future make-up of Miami-Dade County's workforce and population, the geographic distribution of moderately-priced housing, historical and current patterns of development applications and approvals, the distance between jobs and housing for the workforce target income group, the overall impact of the housing shortage on the economy of Miami-Dade County, and the adverse consequences failure to act would have on the health, Page 699ef 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 4 safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County. The need for the workforce housing development program as identified by the task force is the result of a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, those noted below. >>Since the task force concluded its analysis in 2007, various studies have demonstrated the continued need for a workforce housing development program.<< (1) Increasing population pressure. Miami-Dade County, in both the incorporated and unincorporated areas, [[is experiencing a rapid]] >>continues to experience an<< increase in the numbers of residents in the workforce target income group, including persons with fixed or reduced incomes, young adults forming new households, minority households, single adults, and many public employees and others in key occupations serving the entire community including teachers, police and public safety personnel, health care workers and mid-level management workers. Studies show that, as a result of this population increase, for the foreseeable future of the new labor force in Miami- Dade County will require workforce housing. (2) Cost burdens. »Sine . 2007, households<< [[Households]] in Miami-Dade County >>have continued to<< suffer from a high and increasing housing cost burden. Households have traditionally been regarded as "cost burdened" if they spend more than 30[[%]] >>percent<< of their gross income on housing costs. [[.- ' !.:- . .. nearly 51% of all renter households pay more than 30% of their income in gross rent. In owner occupied units, more than 36% of all households pay more than 30%of their income on housing]] (3) Inadequate housing supply for the workforce target income group. Current patterns of development, the costs of acquiring land suitable for residential development, and the disposition of remaining developable land have resulted in an abundance of higher-priced housing and a shortage of housing economically attainable by the workforce target income group. With the exception of housing developed with government subsidies, privately developed new residential housing being built in Miami-Dade County generally is not affordable to the workforce target income group. Experience Page 691 '2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 5 indicates that state and federal funds for the construction of affordable housing will not address the housing needs of the workforce target income group. (4) Overcrowding. Overcrowding is a major problem in Miami-Dade County. The problem is acute in low to moderate income households and households in the workforce target income group. [[Analyses indicate-nearly 20% of all housing Dade County are overcrowded.]] (5) Concentration of housing based on economic status. Demographic analyses indicate that development applications and approvals that reduce the supply of land developable for residential use, and which result in a disproportionate amount of higher-priced housing, result in a reduced supply of housing for individuals and families in the workforce target income group, including young families, retired and elderly persons, single adults, female heads of houses, and minority households. Such development activity produces the undesirable and unacceptable effect of concentrating housing according to price, thus frustrating the policies and goals of the housing element of the CDMP, and increasing the threat to the public health, safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County. (6) . Need for involvement of private development community. Existing efforts to encourage private, for-profit, developers to construct housing within the economic reach of the workforce target income group>>, including the voluntary workforce housing development program established in Ordinance No. 07-05,<<have met with very limited success. It is apparent that the need for housing for the workforce target income group can only be addressed if the responsibility for ensuring a diverse and adequate supply of housing is shared by Miami- Dade County, and the private, for-profit, development community »through a mandatory program<<. Page 692 vfp2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 6 C. Authority to establish and administer a workforce housing development program. The Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter specifically authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for the development of Miami-Dade County in the incorporated and unincorporated areas, to establish, coordinate, and enforce such zoning regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public, to exercise all powers and privileges granted to municipalities, counties and county officers by the Constitution and laws of the State, to exercise all powers not prohibited by the Constitution or by the Charter, and to perform any other acts consistent with law which are required by the Charter or which are in the common interest of the people of the County. The [[ a . -- .. -- _ .. e€]] Miami-Dade County >>Workforce Housing Development Program<< is declared to be a proper and necessary exercise of the powers conferred upon the Board of County Commissioners for the protection of the health, safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County. Consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the land use and housing elements of the CDMP, the objective of the [[workforce housing development program]] >>Workforce Housing Development Program<< is to increase the supply of housing affordable to the workforce target income group, and to address many of the problems associated with the short supply of housing affordable to the workforce target income group and with the uneven, poor geographic distribution of such housing throughout Miami-Dade County. Through utilization of a combination of density bonuses, relaxation of intensity standards, flexible design criteria, and other incentives, the workforce housing program established herein will help alleviate the existing housing shortage by making it more feasible for the private, for-profit, development community to create and deliver a greater number of housing units affordable to the workforce target income group. Dispersal of workforce housing units throughout this community will avoid overconcentration of such housing. D. Joint effort of private development community, public sector, and not-for-profit sector. It is the further intent of the Board of County Commissioners that [[workforce . ._ ... _ .,.:]] >>the Workforce Housing Development Program<< established herein will foster and encourage the private, for-profit, development community Page 693 f2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 7 to join with the public sector and the nonprofit sector to further the goal of meeting the housing needs of the workforce target income group. E. Adoption of legislative intent, findings and purpose. The foregoing statements are declared to be the legislative intent, findings and purpose of the Board of County Commissioners and are hereby adopted and made a part hereof. Sec. 33-193.5. - Adoption of land use regulations and procedures for operation of Miami-Dade County's Workforce Housing Development Program. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts land use regulations and procedures >>for the incorporated and unincorporated areas<< for the operation of the Miami-Dade County [[workforce housing development program]] >>Workforce Housing Development Program<<. The [[workforce housing development program]] >>Workforce Housing Development Program<<, including all land use regulations and operating procedures, is deemed to be essential to assure the protection of the public health, safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience of.the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County. All land use regulations adopted in connection with the {[workforce ' development program]] >>Workforce Housing Development Program« shall be supplemental to existing zoning on affected properties and shall be construed to be consistent therewith. The Board of County Commissioners >>may<< [[shall]] adopt by resolution>>, or the Director may establish,«such administrative procedures as may be necessary or proper to further the purposes of this article and thereby protect the public health, safety, welfare, comfort, and convenience of the present and future residents of Miami-Dade County. Sec.33-193.6. -Definitions. The following words and phrases, as used in this article, have the following meanings: (1) >>"«Application>>"<< means any request for zoning action, building permit, administrative site plan review, or administrative modification under Chapter 33, or any request for approval or extension of approval of any type of application for subdivision of land pursuant to Chapter 28, where such request seeks approval to develop residential or mixed uses subject to the requirements of this article. Page 694 QF277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 8 (2) >>"<<At one location>>"<< means all land owned by the applicant, including: (a) All adjacent parcels, the property lines of which are contiguous at any point; or (b) All adjacent parcels, the property lines of which are separated only by a public or private street, road, highway or utility right-of-way, or other public or private right-of-way at any point; or (c) All adjacent parcels, under common ownership or control of the applicant, including land owned or controlled by any business entities in which the applicant or immediate family members of the applicant possesses any form of management control. (3) >>"Department" means the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources or successor department. (4) "Director" means the Director of the Department, or the Director's designee. (5) "<<Transit corridor area>>"<<is the area which lies within a one-half mile radius of the Metrorail stations. >>L6_1<< [[(4)]] >>"<<Urban Infill Area (UIA) >>"<<is the area as defined in the Comprehensive Development Master Plan(CDMP). »0«[[(5)]] >>"<<Work-force housing unit>>"<< or »°°«WHU>>"<< shall mean a dwelling unit, the sale, rental or pricing of which in accordance with this article is restricted to households whose income is within the workforce housing target income range. »Ll<< [[(6)]] >>"<<Workforce housing target income range»"<< means households whose income range is established at >>60 percent<< [[65-%]] up to 140[[%]]>>percent<< of the most recent>>area<<median [[€amily]] income >>("AMI")<< for the County reported by the U.S. HUD as maintained by the Department [[ef Planning and Zoning]]. >>(9) "Workforce housing unit cost" or "WHU unit cost" refers to the estimated cost of each workforce housing unit. This variable is used to calculate the monetary contribution that applicants may make to the affordable housing trust fund, established in Chapter 17, Article VIII of this code, in lieu of constructing workforce housing units.<< Page 62W 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 9 Sec. 33-193.7. — Applicability >>in the Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas; Minimum Standards; Exemptions; Administrative Modifications and Appeals<<. [[(p) An--applieaf. -- _ . • •_ -- • .:nus---and application") shall: (A) (-1-) For WHU applications seeking approval of workforce housing units or a monetary contribution as provided in Section 33 193.9; and (2-) - . " 1_ . .. • -- .. _ . fewer than 20 dwelling units, provide a monetary contribution as provided in Section 33 193.9.1. (B) A WHU application seeking to develop property priced to sell or rent to persons in the workforce housing target income range (Existing WHUs) shall provide for a total number of WHUs equal to the of WHUs that would have bccn required had there been no Existing WHUs on the property; Each WHU application to develop improved property shall . • . - !'. -r Existing WHUs are on the property.]] >>(A) Countywide applicability and minimum standard. The requirements of the Workforce Housing Development Program shall be applicable as a minimum standard in the unincorporated and incorporated areas of Miami-Dade County. It shall be the duty and responsibility of each municipality and all municipal departments, officials, and employees to enforce the minimum standards prescribed by the provisions of this article within the territorial limits of their respective municipalities, except that this article shall not apply in those municipalities that by ordinance have opted out of the Workforce Housing Development Program in the manner set forth in this section. (1) Opt-Out Option. A municipality may opt out of the requirements of this article by adopting an ordinance addressing the need for workforce housing within its territorial jurisdiction. Said Page 690/of 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 10 ordinance shall be accompanied by data and analysis considering the need for workforce housing within its jurisdiction and demonstrating that the ordinance will address the identified needs. (2) Time or com•liance b , munici•alities. Municipalities shall have 90 days from the effective date of this ordinance to adopt a workforce housing ordinance that complies with the minimum standards set forth in this article or that satisfies the opt-out requirements. Each municipal workforce housing ordinance shall be filed with the Director within 15 days after adoption by the municipality. cB) The Workforce Housing Development Program shall be applied as follows: (1) 20 or more dwelling units. Residential developments with 20 or more dwelling units shall be required to provide workforce housing units in accordance with the following. Administrative Site Plan Review shall be required of all such developments in accordance with the requirements of this article. Except as provided in Section 33- 193.8, all workforce housing units will be provided on the site of the proposed development. (a) New developments. AU new developments shall provide at least 10 percent of the total units in the development as WHUs. The development shall thereafter be entitled to a density bonus of 15 . percent over the maximum number of units allowed by the applicable CDMP land use designation and to the increased intensity standards provided in Section 33-193.11 of this article. For every one percent increase in WHUs provided, a development shall be entitled to an additional one percent density bonus, up to a maximum density bonus of 25 percent., as follows: Page 697277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 11 WIIU Density Type of Set-Aside Bonus Set-Aside 10% 15% Mandatory 11% 16% Bonus 12% 17% Bonus 13% 18% Bonus 14% 19% Bonus 15% 20% Bonus 16% 21% Bonus 17% 22% Bonus 18% 23% Bonus 19% 24% Bonus 20% 25% Bonus The mix of WHUs shall be as follows: j) No less than 50% of the WHUs shall target the income range of 60% to 79% of the AMI. (ii) The remaining 50% of the WHUs may target the income range of 80% to 140% of the AMI. Renovation or Expansion of Existing Residential Structures or Developments. If an existing multi-family residential structure with 20 or more units is expanded by 50 percent or more of the structure's net square footage, the structure shall be required to provide WHUs in accordance with this article. (ii) If an existing single-family or two- family residential development is renovated or expanded by adding 20 or more units, then the new units shall be required to provide WHUs in accordance with this article. The number of required WHUs shall be based only on the number of new units. Page 698 46277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 12 (2) Less than 20 dwelling units. Residential developments with fewer than 20 dwelling units are not required to provide WHUs. but they may develop in accordance with the density and intensity bonuses set forth in this section and Sec. 33-193.11 of this article by either: (a) Providing one of the alternatives described in Sec. 33-193.8; or (b) Setting aside 100 percent of the proposed housing units for workforce housing and complying with other applicable requirements of this article. Except for developments of individual single-family or two-family homes, all developments of less than 20 units that participate in the WHU program shall require Administrative Site Plan Review in accordance with the requirements of this article. (3) Nonconforming residential lots. Applicants with legally-established nonconforming single-family residential lots that set aside 100 percent of the proposed dwelling units for workforce housing may develop in accordance with the intensity standards in Sec. 33-193.11 instead of the minimum lot area requirements in Sec. 33-7 of this chapter, without the need for Administrative Site Plan Review, provided that the development otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of this chapter. (4) Residential developments within Urban Center or Urban Area Districts, Planned Area Development Districts, Traditional Neighborhood Development Districts, or other urban overlay districts shall provide workforce housing as specified in the applicable zoning district regulations. (C) Exemptions.« [[f2)]]The provisions of this article shall not apply to property located outside the Urban Development Boundary, as designated in the Land Use Plan (LUP) map of the CDMP, as amended from time to time. Page 699 of*277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 13 >>(D) Administrative Modifications and Appeals. (1) The Director may waive, adjust, or reduce the minimum WHLT set-asides, applicable density bonus provisions or intensity standards, or the amount of any alternative monetary contribution for a development if, in reviewing the lot size, product type, and other elements of the development plan, the Director determines that: (_4). 100 percent of the development has been set aside for households at or below 140 percent of AMI; or (b) Developing the property with the density bonus permitted in this article would : (i) cause a violation of applicable environmental standards or other regulations; or (ii) be incompatible with the surrounding area; or (c) There is no reasonable relationship between the impact of the proposed residential development and the requirements of this article; or (d) Applying the requirements of this article would constitute a taking or an abrogation of vested rights. (2) The requirements of this article may only be waived, adjusted, or reduced upon a determination that the waiver, adjustment, or reduction is the minimum needed. (3) Procedures. (a) Applications. A request for administrative modification of the requirements of the Workforce Housing Development Program shall be submitted in writing to the Department on a form required by the Director. (b) Notice. Within 15 days after the determination, notice of the Director's determination shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation. (c) Appeals. Any aggrieved person may appeal the Director's determination to the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section 33-314 within 30 days after the date of Page 700 of 07 Agenda Item No. 4(3) Page 14 newspaper publication, except that an applicant claiming that the Director's determination constitutes a taking or abrogation of vested rights shall follow the rocedures for chailen.in_ a development permit provided in Sections 2-114.1 through 2-114.4 of this code. If no timely appeal is taken, the Director's determination shall become final, and the necessary changes shall be made upon the zoning maps and records.<< Sec. 33-193.8. -Alternatives to on-site construction of WHUs[[; variances]]. [[(A)]] Alternatives. An applicant [[for a WHU application ("WHU applicant")]] may satisfy the requirement of on-site construction of all of the required WHUs or of a portion of required WHUs by one of the means described below [[upen conditions, allowing the alternative will observe the spirit of this development of housing for the workforce target income group in the unincorporated ar a of Miami Dade County to an equal or greater extent than construction of the required WHUs on site]]. >>Where the proposed development is a condominium or other form of residential development requiring unit owners to pay assessments for the maintenance of common areas or other purposes, WHUs shall be provided through one of the alternatives set forth in this section.<< (1) Off-site construction of WHUs. [[If an approval is obtained after public hearing in accordance with the standards in this section, a WHU]] »An<< applicant may comply with the requirements of this article by construction of [[ f]] the number of WHUs required by this article at one or more alternative sites within a >>1-<< [[2]] mile radius of the proposed location of the market rate units (the "Off-site WHUs"). >>(a) The alternative site must contain both its market rate and workforce housing units in addition to the Off-site WHUs. Page 701 of/07 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 15 (b)<< The Off-site WHUs [[ . : . : e sane-Ge Enmuni ty Council-jurisdiction as the market . - . . : ., 4-the-eonstruetion-e€ the Off site WHUs on the alternative site]] shall occur concurrently with the market rate units on the primary site. >>(c) The density bonus for the primary site shall not be transferable to the off-site property.<< (2) Monetary contribution in lieu of construction of WHUs. [[If an approval is obtained after public h ing in accordance zth-th - - -- - permitted as of right pursuant to section 33 193.9, a W414]] »An<< applicant may satisfy the requirements of this article by providing a monetary contribution to the affordable housing trust fund established in Chapter 17, Article VIII of this code, in lieu of construction of the required on-site workforce housing units. Any monetary contributions received by the County shall not be commingled with any other funds deposited into the affordable housing trust fund that are not associated with the WHU program, but shall be deposited into a separate account. The amount of such required monetary contribution shall be as established in section 33- 193.9[[-]]. All monetary contributions shall be made prior to the issuance of the first building permit on the market rate units. (3) Combination of off-site construction of WHUs and monetary contributions. [[. . . . ' .. . . - public hearing in accordance with tho standards in this section, a WHU]] >>An<< applicant may comply with the requirements of this article >>by<< employing a combination of the alternatives (1) and (2) above in accordance with the standards of this section. varied after public hearing, only upon demonstration that a in an unnecessary hardship, that allowing the variance will variance is granted is the minimum needed to avoid the hardship, and that the objectives of this article to increase the supply of housing for the workforce housing target group within the Community Council area will continue to be met if the requested variance is granted: Page 702 of, 7 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 16 H) -- ... - .: - . - onus provisions-oily standards; (2) Th- - • •_ . . . WHU- application; ( The ameu o • - - . . . .- . . p. ••. : • • .•. . (C) If zoning appreval is—required, the application for such approva . ._ -- -- ... ' •ation for appreved er--denies • ..- ., - .. . ' - .. (A) All applications seeking to utilize the density or intensity shall include a minimum percentage of workforce housing units based on the following: CDMP Land Use Proposed Gross Density of Percentage of All Residential Units Category Development Required To Be Work Force Units Estate Up to and Including 2.5 5 Percent} Units Per Gross Acre. 3.125 Units Per Gross Acre 12.5 Percent Lew-Density From 3 up to and Including 6 4. Residential Units Per Gross Acre. 5 Percent From 6 to 7.5 Units Per Gross Acre. 12.5 Percent Low Medium - - - -: : ••-= =- .=- 5 Percent} 13 Units Per Gross Acre. From 13 up to and Including 12.5 Percent; 16.25 Units Per Gross Acro. From 13 up to and Including 5 Percent./ Residential 20 Units Por Gross Acre. From 20 up to and Including '- 31.25 Units Per Gross Acre. .... . ' units7 Medium-High From 25 up to and including No Required Work Force Units. Density Residential 75 Units Per Gross Acre ,- .. .. - . . . . . - .. . Page 703 oyL77 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 17 units-required pursuant to Section 3-3- 193.9.1 equal to 5%-of-the-market rate units. No-Required Work Force Units: High-Density From 50 up to and-including quired pursuant to Section 33 1g Residential 156 Units Per Gross Acre 193.9.1-equal to 50/0 of the market rate units In accordance wit Office/Residential applicable CDMP Refer to applicable residential ategory ov previsions •In accordance with _ • Business and Office applicable CDMP ` ' " ' ' " " _ a above previsions Industrial In accordance with 20 percent} applicable CDMP provisions Those urban centers not Urban Center rezoned as of February 4, 12.5 Percent 2007 (the effective date of this ordinance) 1Tho number of WHUs to be provided shall be 5% of the total number of market rate-units. the total number of units. - ' - ': - • .. P. -0 density category higher than that allowed in the adjoining or adjacent residentially designated area on the same-side of th- . .- _ • ... ... • . ., . . - density of existing adjoining or adjacent residential development- or zoning if the adjacent or adjoining land is undeveloped. development existing, zoned or designated on the same side-of the abutting principal roadway, then the allowable maximum plan allows across the roadway. Where there is no residential use, zoning or designation on either side of the roadway, the intensity • • -- exclusively office use of the site. • • _ . • _ "• designated density of the adjacent or adjoining residentially or up to the density of any such existing residential development, or zoning if the adjacent or adjoining land is undeveloped, Page 704277 Agenda Item.No. 4(J) Page 18 whichever is higher. If there is no-adjacent-or-adjoining residential use existin_, - : c . . _ - . -e-side-e-f he roadway, exists or which this plan allows across-the-roadway. Where there is no residential-use, zoning or designation on either side of the roadway, th- •- - - • : •. . .. --- , •- ... = height, bulk and floor area ratio shall-be-no-greater than that which would be permitted for an exclusively commercial use of the site: (B) All applications for residential developments-within-Urban Centers depicted on the Land Use Plan (LUP) map-of-the CDMP that are zon-. . .. .. ... -- - . -- . date of this article shall--net-be (C) Applicants so- . . . • • • -• . ° . . . .. not seek approval of any application or proffer any declaration of restrictive covenants providing for a density underlying zoning district regulations, all zoning actions approved on the property and the maximum allowable density-bonuses:]] Sec. 33-193.9[[4]]. - Monetary contribution in lieu of construction of WHUs. (A) WHU developments of fewer than 20 residential units seeking to utilize the density or intensity bonus available pursuant to this article shall pay an amount as follows: >>(#of market rate units x WHU unit cost)/20 = Total contribution<< [ .. -- - .. • . - .. . . : -- - $110,000 20 Total Contribution]]. (B) Developments for which a monetary contribution has been approved in accordance with section 33-193.8[[(A) or 33 193.8(D)]] and developments required to contribute pursuant to section >>33-193.7<< [[33 193.9(A)]] shall pay an amount as follows: Page 705 o4a77 • Agenda Item No. 4(3) Page 19 >>#of WHU units x WHU unit cost = Total contribution<< [[Number•-©f Willis required to be developed (fEactiens-rounded down) $110,000 Total contribution]]. >>(C) The WHU unit cost shall be established by implementing order approved by the Board of County Commissioners and shall be published annually by the Housing Director, as defined in Chapter 17 of this code. The WHU unit cost shall be reviewed aruivally.<< Sec. 33-193.10. - [[Density-bonuses-.]] >>Administrative Site Plan Review. Except for individual single-family and two-family homes, which shall be approved if deemed to be in compliance with this article and other applicable provisions of this chapter, all applications for development approval shall comply with the requirements of this article and with the site plan and architectural review criteria contained herein. Developments shall be processed and approved administratively as follows: (A) Administrative site plan review. The Department shall review plans, including the exhibits listed below for completeness and compliance with the provisions of this article and the design and site plan review criteria provided herein. Additionally, all applications shall be reviewed by the following departments of Miami-Dade County and other public entities for potential impacts on infrastructure and other services resulting from the application: Department of Transportation and Public Works, Department of Waste Management, Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Department, and Miami-Dade Public Housing and Community Development Department or the successor agencies, as well as the Miami-Dade County School Board. Page 706 ot922'77 • Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 20 (1) If a department's review indicates impacts on services and infrastructure provided by any of the foregoing,the applicant shall meet with the affected department or entity to discuss potential mitigation of the impacts and shall submit evidence to the Department as to the resolution of the impact. u The Director shall issue a final decision within 21 days of the date of submission of the completed application. The applicant shall have the right to extend the 21-day period by an additional 21 days upon timely request made in writing to the Department. The Department shall have the right to extend the 21-day period by written notice to the applicant that additional information is needed. Denials shall be in writing and shall specifically set forth the grounds for the denial. Any final decision of the Director may be appealed in accordance with the procedures established in this chapter for appeals of administrative decisions. (B) Applications for administrative site plan review under this article shall be accompanied by exhibits prepared by registered architects and landscape architects which shall be submitted to the Department and shall include the following: fl) Site plan(s)including: a. • Locations, shape, size, and height of existing and proposed buildings, decorative walls and entrance features; b. Building exterior finish material; c. Indication of street vistas; d. Lot lines and setbacks; e. Location of WHUs and market rate units by bedroom count f Location of open spaces including anchor points if applicable; g Location of on-street and off-street parking including type of permeable materials if used on parking lots, loading facilities, and waste collection areas; h. Indication of signage; i. Indication of any site or building design methods used to conserve ener•y;and Page 707 821`!7 Agenda Item No. 4(1) Page 21 Locations of backflow prevention devices and connections. Indication of the placement and type(s) of lighting fixtures to illuminate roadways and parking areas. al Landscape plans, including specifications of species of plant material, location, and size in accordance with this article and Chapter 18A of this code. (41 Street cross-sections, including adjacent buildings and open space. (5) Floor plans for WHU and market rate units, elevations, and sections of all buildings, including total gross square feet of area for each floor and all dimensions relating to the requirements of this article. (6) Figures indicating the following: a. Gross and net acreage; b. Total square footage for each use by type; c. Total number of dwelling units (including WHU and market rate units); d. Amount of passive and active open space in square feet; e. Parking required and provided; f Such other design data as may be needed to evaluate the project. (C) As a condition for approval, a Declaration of Restrictions shall be submitted in compliance with Sec. 33-193.11.<< [[(A) •• _ • •. . . . . _ .. . .. - WHUs on site, or othe •- ... . _ . - . 193.8 of this article, shall be entitled to a residential density bonus of 25 percent above the applicable CDMP Land Uso . . - .. '. ... . • 1- ... - . .. • , . • all of the requirements of this article) as well as the benefit of the intensity standards provided in section 33 193.11. The density bonus for the primary site shall not be off site WHUs. •(B) •a-' • ...: :.. .. . . . . . _ °• . . . .... . Page 7082g277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 22 a density bonus above-the-GD PP-maximum density to such o ._. . - . - :-nefit of the intensity standards provided-in section 33 193.11. (C) The total number of dwelling units permitted, including .. - . . , - . . - , .. - -'_ - . . -xeeed-the ---•- . --nsity allowed in the zoning district in a . ... -- -- - -going - . • : - •- : in no event shall the density exceed the n imum densities, •• •- _ ..- .. - :4 .ses, set forth in the CDMP, as amended. •(D) - _ - : : : . t . -, -., . . • - onjunction with the density bonuses contained in this article.]] Sec. 33-193.11. -Intensity standards. (A) Notwithstanding zoning district regulations to the contrary, the following maximum intensity standards shall apply to >>developments that include WHUs on-site and to alternative sites providing Off-site WHtJs in accordance with Section 33-193.8 of this article.<< [[applications seeking approval of a WHU application that provides either the WHUs required to obtain a density bonus or a monetary contribution in lieu thereof, under the provision of this Article]] >>(1) Single Family Residential Intensity Standards Zoning Minimum Lot Size Maximum Lot Coverage Minimum Lot Frontage District EU-2 4 Acres 20% 165 ft (with r/w) EU-1C 2 Acres 20% 125 ft (with r/w) EU-1 29,040 sq. ft. 20% 110 ft EU-S 17,424sq.ft. 30% 110 ft (with r/w) No minimum depth EU-M 12,000 sq. ft. 30% 100 ft No minimum depth RU-1 5,000 sq. ft. of net area; Platted on or before 3/8/02 - 50 ft 10%of development 42% 10%may have 40 ft Page 709 gi277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 23 Zoning Minimum Lot Size Maximum Lot Coverage Minimum Lot Frontage District may have 3,750 sq. ft. Platted after 3/8/02—48% RU-2 5,000 sq.ft.of net area; Platted on or before 3/8/02 - 50 ft 10% of development 42% 10%may have 40 ft may have 3,750 sq. ft. Platted after 3/8/02—48% RU-1M(a) 4,000 sq.ft. of net area Platted on or before 3/8/02 - 40 feet and 48% RU-1M(b) Platted after 3/8/02—54% (2)Multi-Family Residential Intensity Standards Zoning Minimum Lot Maximum Max Maximum Minimum District Size FAR Height Lot Open Space Coverage RU-TH 1,250 sq.ft. of As per RU- 40' As per RU- 20%of net area net area TH TH RU-RH 1,000 sq. ft. of As per RU- As per As per RU- 10%common space net area RH RU-RH RH No private open Density 15 mace DU/net acre RU-3M As per RU-3M 0.60 3 stories 35%of net 20%of net area (40 ft) lot area RU-4L As per RU-4L 1.00 6 stories 35% of net As per RU-4L lot area RU-4M As per RU-4M 1.50 9 stories 35%of net As per RU-4M lot area RU-4 and As per RU-4 2.00 if more 1 As per RU-4 As per RU-4 and RU-4A and RU-4A than 9 stories additional and RU-4A RU-4A story BU-1 and As per BU-1 Add As per 45%of net Open space BU-1A with and BU-1A .015/acre BU-1 and lot area requirements for one Public above BU-1A story building Hearing permitted FAR BU-2 with As per BU-2 Add Ad per 50% of net Open space Public .015/acre BU-2 lot area requirements for one Hearing above story building permitted Page 710 gp&277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 24 Zoning Minimum Lot Maximum Max Maximum Minimum District Size FAR Height Lot Open Space Coverage FAR (B) PAD Districts, Urban Centers, and other overlay or special districts: The density and intensity of the development shall be established in accordance with the applicable zoning district regulations or in a development agreement which is consistent with a proposed site plan. (C) The total number of dwelling units permitted, including market rate units, bonus units, and WHUs, may exceed the permitted maximum density allowed in the zoning district in accordance with the foregoing provisions, provided that the density shall not exceed the maximum allowable density bonuses set forth in the CDMP.<< [[(1) In the EU 2 District: (a) Minimum lot size Four(4)acres; (b) Minimum lot frontage One hundred sixty five (165)feet; (e) Maximum lot coverage Twenty(20)percent. (2) In the EU 1C District: (a) Minimum lot size Two(2)acres; (l}) Minimum lot frontage One hundred twee (125) feet. (3) In the EU 1 District: (a) Minimum lot size Thirty two thousand—five hundred(32,500)square feet; (b) Minimum lot frontage One hundred ten(110)feet. (4) In the EU S District: (a) Minimum lot size Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; (b) Minimum lot frontage One hundred ten(110) feet. (5) In the EU M District: (a) ,... .. . . .. . (12,500)square feet; (b) Minimum lot frontage One hundred(100)feet. (6) In the RU 1 and RU 2 Districts: (a) Minimum net lot area of residential lots shall bo ... .. shall be 50 feet, except that a maximum of 10 percent of the residential lots may be reduced to a Page 711 oft 77 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 25 minimum of 4,00! • .. -- ., - . - -, frontage-ef-40-fcct; and ( - .• eea th l„t coverage permitted by the underlying district regulations by more than 20%. (7) In the RU 11\1(a), and RU 1M(b)Districts: (a) The minimum-net lot area of residential lots shall be sl1=b40 meet,-and (b) Maximum—lot . - _ : - - coverage permitted by the underlying district regulations by more than 20%. (8) Inn-the-RUTH-istr-iet (a) ` .. ... ! . .., lot area; and (b) Minimum-open-space shall be 20 percent of the net lot area (9) In the RU RH district: (a) Minimum lot size shall be 1,000 square feet of net lot area; and (b) Density shall not exceed 15 dwelling units per net acre; and (e) No private open space shall be required; and (d) A minimum of 10 percent common open space shall be-provided-in-the-way-of-greens: (1-0) In the RU 3M district: (a) Maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.60; and' (b) . . . .... -- : •- . • •- • , -, - _ , ! feet in overall height; and and (d - .. ... -. - ... I \�J land area. (1.1) In the RU 4L district: (a) Maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.9; (3) .. .. - _ - (e) Maximum lot coverage shall bo 35% of net lot area. (12) In the RU 4M district: •(a) `.,. .•• .. 0:• .. . .. • ■.•( .. •- • .. ' • -_ (e) Maximum lot coverage shall be 35%of net lot area. (13) 'In the RU 4 and RU 4A districts: •(a) : - .. -• ---• - - - (b) ° -. . . , . . (11) In the BU 1 and BU lA districts if approved after public hearing: Page 712 9277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 26 (a) Maximum floor area ratio Add .015 per acre above-hat-permitted-by the district regulations; (b) . . . . - .. 4 ° . . -- (c) Landscaped open space shall be the open space perce i d— y--the—underly=n�-district (15) In the BU 2 district if approved after public h aring: (a) Maximum floor area ratio Add .015 per-acre above that permitted by the district regulations (b) Maximum lot coverage shall be 50%of net lot area; (c) Landseaped—epen space shall be the open space percentage required by the underlying district regulations for a^ story bu lding (4-6) In all transit corrider-areas parking shall be provided as (a) the minimum parking required shall be: Residential One (1) parking space per dwelling unit. Office One (1) parking space per four hundred—(400) square feet of gross floor area. iii-: Hotel One (1) parking space for every two (2) est reem. (B)]]>>Lj )<< Severable use rights, as provided in Chapter 33B of this code, shall not be utilized in conjunction with the >>density or<<intensity standards contained in this article. Sec. 33-193.12. - Design (( ems.]] >>criteria and development parameters.<< (A) Workforce housing units shall be comparable in design and materials to market-rate units within the development in terms of exterior appearance. [ .. . - may be grouped or dispersed throughout the-development.]] >>All workforce housing units constructed or rehabilitated under this program shall be integrated within the development so as not to be in less desirable locations than market-rate units and shall, on average, be no less accessible to public amenities, such as open space, as the market-rate units. Page 713 of7 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 27 (]3 All development projects shall be designed so as to reduce energy consumption. Energy conservation methods may include, without limitation, the natural ventilation of structures, the siting of structures in relation to prevailing breezes and sun angles, and the provision of landscaping for shade and transpiration. (C) The architectural design and scale of each proposed structure shall be compatible with surrounding existing or proposed uses or shall be made compatible by the use of building height transitions and screening elements. Screening elements can include trees and shrubs, walls and fencing, or any combination of these elements. Visual buffering shall be provided between parking and service areas and adjacent uses. (D) Single-Family or Two-Family Residential Design Standards.<< [[(B)]] Notwithstanding underlying zoning regulations that limit the number of residential units that may be constructed on a single platted lot, residential developments incorporating workforce housing units >>j EU, RU-1, RU-1M(a), RU-1M(b), and RU-2 districts<< may utilize the following flexible design provisions, provided that the total development density shall not exceed that allowed by this article. Units to be developed in accordance with this section shall be approved only upon demonstration that a declaration of condominium has been filed in accordance with state law(if any unit is to be sold. (1) No more than 3 total residential units may be placed on a single platted lot, of which no more than one unit may be, but shall not be required to be, a market rate unit; and (2) The entrance to each of the units on a single platted lot shall be>>through<< [[; (a) Thfeugh]] a common hall/foyer area in the front of the building, which shall be concealed by a building wall with 1 entrance door, giving the appearance of a single- family >>home or, where applicable, two- family home<< [[residential unit; or (h-) The entrance to the workforce housing trnit(a) shall be clearly designed to be subordinate to the principal entrance of the Page 714 of AZi Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 28 building for the market rate-+ni-t:When- -he entrance is configured in this manner, the design shall—inc-erperate architectural features and elements that clearly entrance as the---prederi-nant entrance from the other entrances]]. (3) Buildings designed under these parameters shall not be located on the periphery of a development, adjacent to or across the street from previously established single-family residential neighborhoods. (4) The locations of the parking spaces for the units within the building shall be dispersed around the building so as not to create a parking field for all of the spaces in the front of the building. >>C51 The footprint of the residential structure shall have the appearance of a single-family or, where applicable,two-family home. 01 Unless the plumbing system of the residential building is connected to a sanitary sewer, lots that have a septic tank with field drains shall have a rear yard with an area of at least 25 percent of the total lot area. The rear lot area required to care for a septic tank drain field shall not be occupied by an accessory building or other structure. (E) Multi-Family Residential Design Standards: The following , Multi-Family design standards shall apply to WHUs in development projects within RU-3M; RU-4L; RU-4M; RU-4; RU-4A; RU-5; RU-5A:, B U-1; BU-IA; BU-2; and BU-3 Zoning Districts: In a multi-family residential development, the ratio of efficiency, one-bedroom, and larger WHUs shall not exceed the ratio of efficiency, one-bedroom, and larger dwelling units among the market rate units. (2) All buildings shall have their main entrance opening to a street or meaningful open space, such as a square,park, green,plaza or promenade. Page 715 oflJ Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 29 (3) All developments shall have unobstructed sidewalks or pedestrian paths a minimum six feet wide providing pedestrian linkages to adjacent neighborhoods. (4) Buildings shall be oriented towards the street. (5) Building architecture, exterior finish materials and textures, architectural elements, and ornamentation shall be selected to produce human scale at street level. (6) Open Space. A minimum percent of open space shall be provided pursuant to Sec. 33-193.11. Open spaces and landscaping shall be incorporated into the design of all developments to allow sufficient light and air to penetrate the development, to direct wind movements, to shade and cool, to visually enhance architectural features and relate the structure design to the site, and to functionally enhance the development: outdoor graphics and exterior art displays and water features are encouraged to be designed as an integral part of the open spaces and landscaped areas. (7) Service areas shall be located and screened to minimize negative visual impacts from the street and adjacent properties. (8) Mechanical equipment installed on roofs shall be screened from view . by parapets or other architectural elements. Mechanical equipment installed at ground level shall be screened by walls or by similar landscape and architectural elements. (9) Dumpsters shall not be visible from the street. (10) Architectural elements at street level shall have human scale, abundant windows, doors and design variations to create interest for the pedestrian. Blank walls at street level and above the ground floor of buildings are not permitted. (111 All parking garages shall have all architectural expressions facing public open spaces consistent and harmonious with that of habitable space. Page 716 );2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 30 (F) Other Development Parameters • (1) Design considerations shall include: the placement, orientation and scale of buildings and building elements particularly at street level, sidewalks and connections, and provisions of weather protection, landscape, and lighting. (2) All on-site utilities shall be buried underground. (3) Adequate circulation to accommodate emergency vehicles shall be provided throughout the development. (4) The development shall be designed with a coordinated, outdoor, pedestrian-scaled lighting system that is adequate, integrated into the development, and compatible and harmonious with the surrounding areas. (5) Street furniture such as trash containers and benches shall be permanently secured to the sidewalk. Street furniture shall not obstruct sight visibility triangles at street intersections.<< Sec. 33-193.13. -Required declaration of restrictive covenants Prior to final approval of any >>development<< [[application]] seeking to utilize the density or intensity bonus available pursuant to this article >>, including applications for single-family homes and duplexes<<, the applicant shall submit a separate declaration of restrictive covenants, encumbering the entire >>development<< [[project]], approved in form by the Director >>and the Housing Director in accordance with Chapter 17, Article IX of this code<< and sufficient for recording in the public records of Miami-Dade County, Florida, including provisions requiring development of a specified number,type, and location of all dwelling units, a general plan for staging construction of all units, and such other provisions as the Department may require to demonstrate the applicant's compliance with this article. The development and.the WHU staging plan must be consistent with the CDMP and any applicable land use, subdivision regulations, zoning and site plan approval for the property. The declaration of restrictive covenants shall require the property to be developed in accordance with the following specifications: Page 71&;22277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 31 (A) A general description of the covered development, including whether the covered development will contain rental dwelling units or owner-occupied dwelling units, or both; (B) The total number of market rate dwelling units and WHUs in the development and the timetable for construction; and (C) The location of the WHUs in the development and phasing, if any, and construction schedule for the development sequence demonstrating that: (1) WHUs will be built and made available for occupancy simultaneously with or before market- rate dwelling units, except that building permits for the last 10[[°x]] >>percent<< of the market-rate units shall be withheld until building permits have been issued for all of the WHUs; and (2) The last building shall not contain only WHUs. (D) If the requirements of this article are to be satisfied through the use of an alternative to on-site construction as provided in section 33-193.8 >>of this article<<, [[of this code,]] the declaration of restrictive covenants shall identify and commit to the development of WHUs on an approved alternative site. A separate declaration of restrictive covenants encumbering the alternative site shall identify and commit to the development of the approved off-site WHUs, and shall further provide appropriate assurances that the required WHUs for the alternative site itself will be provided. (E) The declaration of restrictive covenants may be modified by mutual consent of the applicant and the >>Director<< [[Department of ' ., .... .. . . .. : ., . ,. :.- Housing ^g° y]] and the [[ ]] Housing >>Director in accordance with Chapter 17, Article IX of this code.,<< [[and Community D ]], as long as the modified agreement remains in conformity with this article and substantially conforms to the recorded declaration's provisions relating to number, location, distribution and timing or construction of WI-Us. Page 71,22277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 32 Sec. 33-193.14. -Workforce housing agreement. Prior to the earlier of final plat approval or application for building permit for the first residential unit on the property subject to the requirements of this article » « the applicant shall submit a declaration of restrictive covenants, approved in form by the Director >>and the Housing Director in accordance with Chapter 17, Article IX of this code,« and sufficient for recording in the public records of Miami-Dade County, Florida, encumbering the individual WHUs in the entire development, specifying the restrictions of the WHUs and such further arrangements, [[and]] restrictive covenants, >>and resale restrictions« as are necessary to carry out the purposes of Chapter 17, Article IX of the code, sections 17-142 through 17-144 inclusive, and shall include the following: (a) A binding commitment that the restrictions of this article shall run with the land for the entire control period, and (b) A binding commitment that the covenants will bind the applicant, any assignee, mortgagee, or buyer, and all other parties that receive title to or an interest in the property, and (c) These covenants shall be senior to all other liens or encumbrances on the property including all instruments securing permanent financing, except that tax and assessment liens shall be superior to these covenants », and except as may be provided in Chapter 17, Article IX of this code«, and (d) A binding commitment that incorporates all terms and conditions regarding WHUs, including without limitation, the required shared equity agreement, eligibility standards, appropriate sale and rental price standards and affordability controls required of purchasers of WHUs pursuant to Chapter 17, Article VIII of this code. »fe) Where WHUs are to be provided as part of a rental development, the declaration and agreement required by this section and Section 11-193.13 may specify the total number of WHU rental units to be made available on the property and provide for an annual inventory of WHUs, instead of encumbering each individual WHU. « Sec. 33-193.15.—Penalties and enforcement. This article shall be enforceable in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 8CC of this code. Violations of this article shall also be punishable by a fine not to exceed>>the value of the in lieu contribution for the mandatory workforce housing units<< Paget 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 33 [[: -. . . .. ,e!0:00)]] or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed [[sixty-(]]60[[)]] days, or by both such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the county court. Any continuing violations of the provisions of this article may be enjoined and restrained by injunctive order [[of-the circuit court]] in appropriate proceedings instituted for such purpose. >>Sec. 33-193.16.—Nonconforming Lots, Uses, and Structures. Nonconforming lots, uses, and structures shall be governed by Section 33-35 of this chapter. A development approved pursuant to the voluntary Workforce Housing Development Program adopted by Ordinance No. 07-05, as amended, shall be deemed to be legally established and may be developed as approved but shall thereafter be subject to the requirements of Section 33-35 of this chapter.<< Section 2. Chapter 17, Article IX of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE IX. -WORKFORCE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION * Sec. 17-140. -Definitions. The definitions contained in Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County, shall apply to this chapter in addition to the following: (1) "Area median income" means the median income level for the Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Statistical Area, as established and defined in the annual schedule published by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and adjusted for household size. • (2) "Certificate of qualification"means a certificate issued by the Department establishing a qualified household's eligibility to purchase or rent a workforce housing unit ("WHU"). Certificates of qualification shall be valid for 12 months. The certification criteria are set by implementing order. Page 72Qn52277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 34 (3) [["Condominium" means-that form of ownership of real property created pursuant to Chapter 718 of the Florida &tatutes�whiell--is comprised entirely of units that am owned by one or mere persons;an4 which there is, app.. - .. . - .. : , - -• - - .., - :n elements:- (4) "Condominium conversion" has the meaning established by sections-7-1-87604 (5)]] "Control period" means each 20-year period during which the affordability restrictions imposed by this article shall apply. The control period begins at the time of any sale or resale of the affected unit by every new WHU owner. [[(6)]]>>(4)<<"Covered development" means all developments providing WHUs or monetary contributions in lieu thereof pursuant to Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County. [[(7)]]>>(5)<<"Department" means, unless otherwise indicated, the [[Office of Community and Economic Development for the]] Miami-Dade >>Public<< Housing [[Agency]] >>and Community Development Department<< or any successor agency. [[(8)]]»(«°°Developer"means any person, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, or any entity or combination of entities that apply for development orders or permits for residential dwelling units seeking to utilize the density or intensity bonus available pursuant to Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County Florida, but does not include the state or any county, municipality, or any governmental entity. [[(9)]]>>(7)<<"»Housing«Director" means, unless otherwise indicated, the Director of the [[Office of Community and :- ... -: . -- !• - ; ; ] the Miami- Dade >>Public<< Housing [[Ageney]] >>and Community Development Department<<, or designee. Page 72277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 35 [[(q-0j]]»01« "Eligible household" means, subject to the provisions of section 17-134 hereof, a household whose total income is between >>60 percent up to« [[6-5% and]] 140[[[°x]]»percent«of Area Median Income. [[(11)]]>>(9)<< "Eligible household income" means any income derived from any proposed occupants of.a WHU who are 18 years of age or older and who will use the WHU as their primary residence. [[(12)]]»(10)« "Household" means any natural person who occupies a WHU as [[lamer her]] »their«primary residence. [[(13)]]»(11)« "Market rate dwelling units" means all dwelling units in a covered development that are not WHUs as defined herein. [[(- 4)]]» 12 « "Qualified household" means an eligible household that has received a certificate of qualification from the Deparhnent. [[(15)]]»(13)« "Workforce housing unit rent" or "WHU rent" means rents that do not exceed the maximum monthly Rent Limits as determined for Miami-Dade County by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in its annual Income Limits and Rent Limits and as used by Florida Housing Finance Corporation for its multifamily rental programs (published annually at http://www.floridahousing.org). [[{4-6)]]>>(14)<< "Workforce housing unit sales price" or "WHU sales price" shall mean the sales price set by the Board pursuant to an implementing order, not to exceed an amount affordable at the maximum workforce housing target income range, as defined in Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County, taking into account (a) family size: (b) an annual fixed interest rate [[based on a thirty (30) year mortgage term]]; (c) payment of up to five percent [[( %)]] down payment by a qualified household; and (d) an estimation of annual property taxes, assessments, loan insurance and financing fees, allowances for property maintenance and repairs, homeowners insurances, homeowner association fees, if any, and allowances for utilities. Page 7223a277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 36 Sec. 17-141. - Applicability. The provisions of this article shall apply to all WHU development >>in the incorporated and unincorporated area<< subject to the provisions of Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County. Sec. 17-142. - Compliance procedures. (A) Workforce Housing Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Workforce housing agreement (1) Every WHU established pursuant to Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami-Dade County shall be offered for sale or rental to a qualified household to be used for [[his or hcr]]>>their<< own primary residence. The [[County, through the]] >>Housing<< Director[[,]] shall publish a pricing schedule of rental and sales prices for WHUs in accordance with this article. (2) Any developer or other property owner offering a WHU for initial sale or rental shall record in the public records one or more covenants or declarations of restrictions in a form approved by the >>Housing Director<< [[County]]. Such covenants or declarations of restrictions shall include the WHU Agreement, and such further arrangements, restrictive covenants, and resale or rental restrictions as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this article. The developer or other property owner must execute and record a declaration of restrictive covenants assuring that: (a) the restrictions of this article shall run with the land for the entire control period; (b) the covenants will bind the applicant, any assignee, mortgagee, or buyer, and all other parties that receive title to or interest in the property. These covenants shall be senior to all instruments securing permanent financing >>, except as provided in this article. Page 7233277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 37 (3) Each qualified household purchasing a WHU shall be required to record a mortgage in favor of Miami-Dade County in an amount of$100.00 or such other amount that may be borrowed by a qualified household from the County. A promissory note shall be executed by each qualified household and secured by said mortgage. Said mortgage shall set forth the same covenants, along with the refinancing and resale restrictions as those included in the restrictive covenants required by this section, and shall requirement of acknowledgment of the County's right of first refusal as set forth in section 17- ' 144(B) and(C). (B) WHUs offered for sale during the initial or any control period shall not be offered for a price greater than the current maximum WHU sales price as determined by the >>Housing Director<< [[Depaft-ment]] at the time of sale. (C) A new twenty (20) year control period shall commence upon any resale and/or transfer to a new owner of such WHU within the initial 20-year control period. Any WHU that is owned for an entire 20»_«year control period by the same individual(s), shall be released from the sales price restrictions under the program. Upon the expiration of the control period the >>Housing Director<< [[County]] shall record in the public records of Miami-Dade County an instrument or document releasing the WHU from the restrictive covenant required by this program A WHU may not be resold during the control period set forth herein for an amount that exceeds the WHU sales price set by implementing order. Prior to offering the dwelling unit for sale during the control period, the WHU owner shall obtain the »Housing« Director's written approval of the WHU sales price. The covenants recorded by each developer or other property owner of WHUs shall state in said covenant that the unit is subject to the following provisions: 1. The covenants shall be senior to all instruments securing permanent financing, >>unless due to the requirements of such permanent financing, such as financing from the Federal Housing Administration, the Housing Director Page 724277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 38 agrees to subordinate such covenants,<< and shall bind all assignees, mortgagees, purchasers and other successors in interest. 2. The total aggregate amount of principal and accrued interest for all financing secured by an individual upon [[his or her]] >>their<< initial purchase of a WHU shall not exceed 105[[%]]>>percent<< of the loan-to-value. Any financing in excess of the lesser of(1) Department's maximum WHU sales price at the time of closing; or (2) the property's appraised value shall not be secured by any interest in the applicable individual WHU. No sale, transfer or foreclosure shall affect the validity of the covenants except as expressly set forth in the provisions of this article. >>It is provided that, where necessary to obtain permanent financing, such as financing from the Federal Housing Administration or similar senior lender, the Housing Director may provide that the control period and other restrictions on the WHU shall not survive the foreclosure in accordance with such senior lender's guidelines and restrictions.<< * * Sec. 17-144.-Affordability controls. (A) Initial sale or rental. (1) Every WHU established under this article and Chapter 33, Article XIIA of the Code of Miami- Dade County, shall be offered for sale or rental to an eligible household to be used for [[his or her]] >>their<<own primary residence. (B) Right of first refusal. (1) Initial Sale. The developer or other property owner of a WHU shall agree to execute a document consistent with a model restriction prepared by the Department, granting to the County, among other things, the County's right of first refusal to purchase the WHU in the event that a qualified household does not execute a contract for purchase within six [[(-63]] months from the Page 725 4277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 39 date the WIN is offered for sale. In the event that no qualified household purchases a WHU within six [K6)1] months from the date the WHU is first offered by the developer or other property owner, the >>Housing<< Director shall recommend to the County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee whether the County should exercise its right of first refusal to purchase the WHU at the WHU sales price. [ . . • - - County Mayor's designee coneurs,the]] >>The<< >>Housing<< Director shall notify the developer or other property owner of the County's decision. »If the County rejects the offer or otherwise does not respond to the offer, the developer or property owner shall remain obligated to sell or rent the WHU to a qualified household and to comply with the declaration of restrictive covenants and workforce housing agreement required by this article and Chapter 33, Article XIIA of this code.<< The County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee is authorized to exercise the right of first refusal provided hereunder, with funds allocated from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund established pursuant to >>Chapter 17, Article VIII of this code<< [[Section 17 129, et seq., Code of Miami Dade County]] or any other authorized source >>of funding<<, for the direct and exclusive purpose of providing workforce housing for those households meeting the workforce housing eligibility requirements. Notwithstanding this authorization to purchase, the County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee shall bring to the Board of County Commissioners a resolution seeking ratification of said purchase at the next available Board meeting following the purchase of the WHU. * * * (E) Foreclosures and other proceedings. (1) If any qualified household of a WHU defaults on its mortgage with the County and said default is not cured within the applicable time periods, then the whole debt secured by said mortgage, with all interest thereon, and all other amounts thereby Page 726 277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 40 secured shall, at the option of the County, become immediately due and payable. In the event any qualified household of a WHU fails to cure the default, the County shall have the right to legally enforce the term of the mortgage or collect the debt in any action at law, including but not limited to a proceeding in foreclosure. Any proceeds, including any expenses or expenditures incurred and recovered by the County, shall be deposited in the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, which has been established pursuant to >>Chapter 17. Article VIII of this code<< [[Section 17 129 et seq. of the Code of Miami Dade County]]. These funds shall not be commingled with any other funds deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund that are not associated with the WHU program, but shall be deposited into a separate account. (2) In any suit, action or proceeding, including without limitation bankruptcy, probate or any other suit, action or proceeding affecting the WHU, any monies recovered by the County shall be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. (3) Notwithstanding subsection E (1) and (2), in the event of default by a qualified household on any senior mortgage associated with a WHU, the County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee is authorized to pay off said senior mortgage and assume ownership of the WHU by using funds from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund for resale to an eligible household. The defaulting qualified household shall be required to vacate the WHU as authorized by law. The County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee is further authorized to purchase any WHU that is sold as a result of any suit, action or proceeding, including but not limited to foreclosure, bankruptcy,probate or any Page 72I€2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 41 other suit, action or proceeding affecting the WFIU. Notwithstanding this authorization to purchase, the County Mayor or the County Mayor's designee shall bring to the Board of County Commissioners a resolution seeking ratification of said purchase at the next available Board meeting following the purchase of the WHU. * * * Sec. 17-145. -Trust Fund Expenditures. Funds from the [[ - - :2. - program]]»Workforce Housing Development Program ("WHU program") established in Chapter 33, Article XXIIA of this code that are<< deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund [[; which has been established pursuant-to-Section 17 129 et seq. of the Code-of Miami Dade County]], including,without limitation, monetary contributions in lieu of development of workforce housing units, shall only be used >>for the purposes set forth in Chapter 33, Article XIIA and Chapter 17, Article VIII of this code.<< [[to increase opportunities to obtain workforce housing for households earning 65% to 80% of the ar a median income. .- , County Mayor's designee may utilize monies deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund from the worlforcc housing * * * Section 3. Section 33E-6.1 of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec.33E-6.1. Payment of road impact fees. (g) >>Deferral of fees.<< Road impact fees exceeding [[- _ ,...•s..: - - ., ]$25,000.00[B]] >>, and road impact fees assessed for development of workforce housing units provided in accordance with Chapter 33, Article XIIA of this code,<< may be deferred >>i , accordance with Section 33E-18 of this article,<< PagE4113 of 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(7) Page 42 provided that the feepayer submits either a surety performance bond (the bond) or an automatically renewable, irrevocable letter of credit (the bond), for the total amount of the impact fee. Upon acceptance of the bond by the County Planning and Zoning Director the building permit may be issued. Section 4. Section 33E-18 of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 33E-18. - Road Impact Fee Deferral For Certain Land Use Types. (A) Notwithstanding anything in the code to the contrary>>, fil« an applicant for a building permit requiring payment of a road impact fee >>that exceeds 525,000.00<< may request a deferral of road impact fee payment for one-half[[(1/2)]] of the assessed road impact fee for a period of up to [[three-19]3[[3]] years >>, or (ii) an applicant for a building permit for workforce housing units provided in accordance with Chapter 33, Article XIIA of this code may request a deferral of 90 percent of the road impact fees assessed for those units for a period of up to two yearst« subject to the following terms, conditions,requirements and limitations: • (1) The deferral program shall not be used to defer road impact for uses under Section 33E-8 for ITE Land Use Types that are categorized as Residential, Recreational or Institutional according to Tables 100 & 100A>>; except for workforce housing units as provided herein<<. (2) As condition of deferral of road impact fees pursuant to this section, the owner of the property that is subject to the road impact fee shall execute a voluntary lien securing payment of the deferred portion of the road impact fee on a form provided by the County Public Works Director and filed in the Public Records of Miami-Dade County. Pa g e4414 of 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 43 (3) A notice that said voluntary lien has been satisfied shall be promptly filed in the Public Records by Miami-Dade County upon final payment of all outstanding road impact fees including associated administrative fees and penalties, if any that may be owed in connection with the road impact fee. (4) The total amount of the road impact fee owed shall be assessed at the time the building permit is issued. (5) Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay >>.01<< the sum of one-half (1/2) of the total road impact fee assessed against the property >>or, for workforce housing units, the sum of 10 percent of the road impact fees assessed for those units<< ("initial payment"), • plus >>(ii)<< the total administrative fee for the assessed road impact fee, plus >>(iii)<< the total administrative fee for deferral as provided under this section. (6) An administrative fee of[[E]]$100>>.00<< [[)]] or [[two]] >>2<< percent [[(-2.%)]] of the deferred portion of the road impact fee, whichever amount is greater, shall be charged in connection with the application for deferred payment of road impact fees under this section. (7) No deferral amount under this section>>, except for amounts assessed for workforce housing units << shall exceed [[twenty five thousand dollars (]]$25,000».00<< [[)]] for a single application. (8) The schedule of payment for the deferred portion of the road impact fee shall be set as follows: a. No schedule authorized under this section may exceed [[thee--0}3[[)]] years >> except that the deferral period for workforce housing units shall be a maximum of 2 years<<; and b. The payment schedule shall provide for collection of a minimum of one-third of the deferred amount for each year>> except that no interim payment for workforce housing units shall be required<<; and c. All road impact fees deferred pursuant to this section shall become immediately due upon a sale, conveyance or other transfer of title of the property that is the subject of Page 7y of 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 44 the road impact fee >>, except for road impact fees deferred for workforce housing units<<. (9) No interest shall be charged against road impact fees deferred under this section,<< provided that they are paid on time in accordance with the payment schedule. It is provided, however, that payments made later than [[ --(]]30[[)]] calendar days from the date that payment of the impact fee installment is due shall be charged interest at the rate of [[ vclve]] >>12<< percent [[(tea)]] per annum simple interest>> << accruing from the date of the initial payment up to the date of the late payment>>,<< plus cost of collection established by implementing order of the Board of County Commissioners. (10) The County Public Works Director>>:<< is authorized to foreclose on the lien for any deferred impact fees»,« including any accrued interest>> << that remain unpaid for more than [[: .. -. - •. . -• ]180[[)]] calendar days beyond the date when deferred impact fees are due»;<< and may assess reasonable fees associated with the foreclosure of the lien and collection of the road impact fee payment>>,<< including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. (B) The County Planning and Zoning Director shall provide an annual report on the status of this program to the Board of County Commissioners. (C) The maximum total amount of road impact funds that may be deferred pursuant to this program is [[ene-million dollars (]]$1,000,000>>.00<< [B]], whereupon this program shall not be available to defer impact fees until such time as the total deferred amount has been reduced by payment of impact fees below the maximum set forth herein. It is provided, however, [[the amount of deferred road impact fees shall not include]] >>that this limitation shall not apply to: (i)road impact fees assessed for development of workforce housing units provided in accordance with Chapter 33, Article XIIA of this code; or (ii)<< deferred impact fees that are secured by a bond or letter of credit pursuant to Section 33E-6.1(g). Page 741f 2277 Agenda Item No. 4(J) Page 45 Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity. Section 6. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance, including any sunset provision, shall become and be made a part of the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word. Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after the date of enactment unless vetoed by the Mayor, and if vetoed, shall become effective only upon an override by this Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED: Approved by County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency: � Prepared by: Dennis A. Kerbel Terrence A. Smith Prime Sponsor: Commissioner Barbara J. Jordan Page 732 bf 2277 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Honorable Mayor Carlos A. Gimenez Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street Miami, FL 33128 Dear Honorable Mayor Gimenez, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael . Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeochfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Barbara J. Jordan Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Jordan, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfu ly, Rafael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Chairman Jean Monestime Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Chairman Monestime, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Audrey Edmonson Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Edmonson, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Sally A. Heyman Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Heyman, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-741 1 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Bruno A. Barreiro Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Barreiro, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, Rafael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Rebeca Sosa Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Sosa, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: • A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. i.___ )/( Respectfully, Rafael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEAC City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Xavier L. Suarez Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Suarez, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF . MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the.City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, A -afael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Danielle Levine Cava Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Cava, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, R fael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Dennis C. Moss Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Moss, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, Rafael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Javier D. Souto Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Souto, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Juan C. Zapata Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Zapata, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afae . Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director • MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Commissioner Jose "Pepe" Diaz Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Commissioner Diaz, Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectful I/ afa- E. Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov Office of the City Clerk Tel: 305-673-7411 September 27, 2016 Vice-Chair Esteban Bovo, Jr. Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, FL 33128 Dear Vice-Chair Bovo, Jr., Attached please find a copy of City of Miami Beach Resolution No. 2016-29557: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TRANSMITTING TO THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (THE "BOARD") THE CITY'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"), URGING THE BOARD TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE DUE TO THE CITY'S MATERIAL CONCERNS AS TO THE ORDINANCE'S APPLICATION AND TIMING, AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, URGING THE BOARD TO EXTEND THE OPT-OUT PERIOD FROM 90 DAYS TO 180 DAYS, TO ALLOW THE CITY ADDITIONAL TIME TO OPT OUT FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE. This Resolution was unanimously passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on September 14, 2016. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, afael . Granado City Clerk c: Maria Ruiz, Housing and Community Services Director