Loading...
Ordinance 94-2965 ORDINANCE NO. 94-2965 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 89-2665,AMENDING SECTION 6,ENTITLED "SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS", AMENDING SUBSECTION 6-2 ENTITLED "RM-1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, LOW INTENSITY" BY MODIFYING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO, (FAR) SCALE FOR ALL PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLLINS AVENUE BETWEEN 76TH AND 79TH STREETS AND HAVING A LOT AREA OF 30,001 SQUARE FEET OR LESS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach has undertaken a comprehensive review to study development regulations in several areas within the Municipality; and WHEREAS,it is necessary to change the Zoning of the properties of the west side of Collins Avenue between 76th and 79th Streets from RM-2 to RM-1 in order to insure that development of those properties will be compatible with development in the Altos del Mar Historic District immediately to the east and with low-rise development which currently exists throughout the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the development regulations for the RM-1 District in the City's Zoning Ordinance must also be amended to increase the maximum permitted floor area ratios, where necessary,to allow for sixty(60)units per acre as provided for in the settlement agreement in Anna Silver v. City of Miami Beach, (attached exhibit A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. That Subsection 6-2, entitled "RM-1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, LOW INTENSITY"of Section 6,entitled"Schedule of District Regulations" of Zoning Ordinance 89-2665 of the City of Miami Beach, Florida is hereby amended as follows: 6-2 RM-1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY. LOW INTENSITY. * * * 1 B. Development Regulations Lot Area equal to or less Lot Area between 15,001 Lot Area greater than than 15,000 sq.ft. and 30,000 sq.ft. 30,001 sq.ft 1. Base FAR Architectural District 0 .75 Architectural District 1.1 Architectural District- 1.1 otherwise-1.6 west side of Collins Avenue west side of Collins Avenue between 76th and 79th Street between 76th and 79th Street - 1.4 - 1.4 otherwise 1.0 otherwise 1.25 2.Maximum FAR with West side of Collins Avenue 1.6 Architectural District-1.6 bonus(See Sec. 6-24). between 76th and 79th Street otherwise-2.0 - 1.4 otherwise- 1.25 * * * SECTION 2. INCLUSION IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 89-2665. It is the intention of the City Commission, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 89-2665 as amended; that the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; and that the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section" or other appropriate word. SECTION 3. REPEALER. That all Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid,the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. 2 SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day of December , 1994. PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of Decei•.er , 9.4. MA'O• ATTEST: '730.....ckAei F.. 11-,, CITY CLERK 1st and only reading 12/21/94 Underlined=new language FORM APPROVED Strilfeettt= deleted language Legal Dept. DJG/JGG By J e-D October 26,1994 December 16,1994 Date /L-11. C:\WP\TRMLFAR.94 3 RESOLUTION NO. 86-18426 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE SETTLEMENT OFFER RELATING TO COSTS AND TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN ANNA SILVER ETC. V. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH. WHEREAS, on March 25, 1986, the Third District Court of Appeal for Florida reversed the Order of the Eleventh Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, which denied Plaintiffs' request for declaratory and injunctive relief based upon the alleged unconstitutionality of the City of Miami Beach's Zoning Ordinance as it effected Plaintiffs' property; and WHEREAS, in reversing, the Third District Court of Appeal determined that Appellants' property was "singled out" for restrictive RM-14 zoning classification, thus resulting in a denial of equal protection; and WHEREAS, the Third District Court of Appeal further remanded this case to the Circuit Court and ordered the City of Miami Beach to rezone the subject property to a classification not less restrictive than 60 units per acre; and WHEREAS, the subject property owners have expended $29,294.76 in costs at both the Circuit and District Court level litigating this action; and WHEREAS, Leon Black, Esquire, attorney for said property owners, has been authorized by his clients to waive all costs in exchange for the prompt termination of all court proceedings and the prompt amendment by the City of the Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of the property to permit 60 units per acre; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Attorney that the chances for success on appeal do not warrant proceeding further with this case and that the settlement offer should be thus accepted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the EXHIBIT "A" -1- % recommendation of the City Attorney is hereby accepted and that the above referenced settlement offer of Leon Black, Esquire, attorney for the property owners in Anna Silver, etc., v. City of Miami Beach, is hereby approved and accepted in total settlement thereof. PASSED and ADOPTED this 16th day of April 1986. MAYOR ATTEST: �l. "✓ •CITY CLERK JKO/rg FORM APPROVED. '4 LE AL DEP -2- 4 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ANNA SILVER, et al. , Appellants, vs. CASE NO. 85-1459 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, etc. , Appellee. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL (Fla. Bar No. 006415) The undersigned counsel hereby stipulate that the Motion for Rehearing in the above styled appeal is dismissed since the cause has been settled prior to a decision on the Motion for Rehearing. As terms of said settlement it is further stipulated that Appellants hereby waive all costs incurred in litigating this action at both Circuit and District Court levels in exchange for the prompt termination of all court proceedings by the City of Miami Beach and the prompt amendment by the City of its Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of the subject property to permit development at 60 units per acre. Respectfully submitted, Arnold M. Weiner City Attorney 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305) 673-7470 B Y� ARNOLD . WEINER KELLY, BLACK, BLACK, BYRNE & BEASLEY, PA Attorneys for Appellants 1400 Alfred I. duPont Building Miami, FL 33131 (3050) 358-5700 ' d44-7 By LEON D. BLACK, JR. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. q5S-1Y TO: Mayor Seymour Gelber and DATE: Members of the City Commission DECEMBER 21, 1994 FROM: Roger M.Cartt City Manager SUBJECT: FIRST READING - ORDINANCE A: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE ZONING MAP OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 89-2665, BY REZONING CERTAIN LOTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLLINS AVENUE BETWEEN 76TH AND 79TH STREETS COLLECTIVELY HAVING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LOTS 1-6, BLOCK 21, LOTS 1-6, BLOCK 22 LOTS 1-6 BLOCK 23 OF THE CORRECTED PLAT OF ALTOS DEL MAR, NUMBER 1 SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 40 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM THE CURRENT RM-2, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY , MEDIUM INTENSITY ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO RM-1, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY LOW INTENSITY; AND TO AMEND THE AFFECTED PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S ZONING DISTRICT MAP TO CORRESPOND WITH THIS CHANGE. ORDINANCE B: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 89- 2665, AMENDING SECTION 6, ENTITLED "SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS", AMENDING SUBSECTION 6-2, ENTITLED "RM-1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, LOW INTENSITY" BY MODIFYING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO, (FAR) SCALE BY INCREASING FAR FOR CERTAIN LOTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLLINS AVENUE BETWEEN 76TH AND 79TH STREETS AND HAVING A LOT AREA OF 30,001 SQUARE FEET OR LESS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends the City Commission adopt on first reading the attached companion ordinances to amend Zoning Ordinance No. 89-2665. AGENDA ITEM -3- G DATE 12 -21-9q BACKGROUND The above two ordinances have been drafted to guide new development in a manner which is more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, yet ensure that the settlement agreement reached in the Third District Court of Appeals Case No. 85-1459 , Anna Silvers, etc. v. the City of Miami Beach, is achieved by allowing a minimum density on any lot or approved combination of lots, as referenced above, of an effective density equivalent to at least sixty (60) units per acre. (See Figure 1. on page 5. ) The Planning Board, at its meeting of October 25, 1994 , voted 5-1 (1 abstention) in favor of recommending adoption of these two ordinances in question. The Board also agreed that the three lots fronting on the west side of Collins Avenue contained in Block 24 between 75th and 76th Streets, be down-zoned in the immediate future to RM-1 from their present RM-2 classification. That matter is scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Board on December 20, 1994 . ANALYSIS The proposed amendment in Ordinance B would increase the floor area ratio (FAR) contained in the development regulations for the RM-1 Zoning District to comply with the Third District Court of Appeals Case No. 85-1459 settlement agreement that authorizes at a minimum sixty (60) units per acre for single lots or approved combination of lots= - described above. Specifically, the base and maximum FAR for a lot having an area equal to or less than 15, 000 sq. ft. , (for the affected properties between 76th and 79th streets) , would be set at a constant FAR of 1.4 to comply with this agreement. For a lot area between 15, 001 and 30, 000 sq. ft. , the base FAR is also changed to the 1.4 number for the same reason. However, the maximum FAR with bonus is not changed since the existing maximum FAR of 1. 6 would allow at least 60 units per acre, (If the maximum FAR in the RM-1 District is reduced in the future this area between 76th and 79th Streets would require that the minimum FAR, (with or without bonuses) , remain at 1.4 to provide at least 60 units per acre. Any reduction in the Bonus Schedule within the current Zoning Code would also have to take into account the settlement agreement above to ensure compliance with the Court Order. ) Combinations of lots having an area in excess of 30, 001 sq. ft. are not effected by the proposed amendment in Ordinance B, since these larger parcels could achieve at least 60 units per acre, (Base FAR of 1. 6 or 74 units per acre) , under the existing development regulations of the RM-1 District. PAGE 2 OF 5 rr Under current RM-1 development regulations with a maximum FAR (with bonus) for an existing lot, the maximum number of units is approximately 11 units or 54 units per acre, ie, (8,750 sq. ft. (actual existing lot area) x 1.25 (maximum FAR with bonus) = 10, 937 sq. ft. (maximum total building floor area) X . 85 (less 15% common areas) = 9, 296 sq. ft. (maximum calculated residential living area) / 800 sq. ft. (minimum average unit size) = 11 residential units, (11. 62 rounded down. ) The number of units per acre is calculated by the following formula: (43 ,560 (acre) / 8,750 (actual lot size) = 4 .978 (lot size factor per acre) X 11 units = 54. 76, number of units per acre currently allowed) . The amendment proposes to increase the maximum and minimum FAR to 1.4 which would allow at least 13 units per single lot (8, 750 sq. ft. ) or 26 units per combination of two lots ( 17, 500 sq. ft. ) which coincides with the Court settlement agreement. Mathematically the calculations are as follows: 8, 750 sf. (actual area of existing lot) X 1. 4 (maximum FAR with bonus) = 12 ,250 sf. (maximum building floor area) X .85 (less 15% common areas, (hallways, lobbies, etc. ) = 10, 412 sf. (maximum building residential floor area) \ 800 sf. (minimum average unit size) _ = 13 (mathematical total maximum permitted units) Table 1, below, displays the FAR calculations in tabular form to more easily display comparisons between lots of varying size: Table 1. FAR Calculation Comparisons Lot Base Max Max Less Min. Max. Effec Area FAR FAR Bldg 15% For Av. # of tive (S. F. ) With FAR Common Unit Units # of Bonus (S.F. ) Areas Size Units (Actual (S.F. ) per Existing acre Lot Area) 8,750 1.4 1.4 12 ,250 10, 412 800 13 65 17, 500 1. 4 XXX 24, 500 20, 825 800 26 65 17 , 500 XXX 1. 6 28, 000 23 , 800 800 29 72 35, 000 1. 6 XXX 56, 000 47, 600 800 59 73 35, 000 XXX 2 . 0 70, 000 59, 500 800 74 92 (See note on the next page. ) PAGE 3 OF 5 (A note must be added here to clarify that the above calculations are mathematical projections and that the actual design and siting of the building on the lot(s) may effect the actual maximum total number of units that may be built on the site. For that reason, the minimum and maximum FAR with bonus has been set at 1.4 for lots less than 15, 001 sq, ft. to ensure that at least 60 units per acre can be readily achieved. ) The rezoning of the property, Ordinance A above, from RM-2 , (Residential Multi Family Medium Intensity) to RM-i, (Residential Multi Family Low Intensity) , would limit development of those properties on the west side of Collins Avenue (to the alley) between 76th and 79th Streets to a scale which would be more compatible with the existing development in the generally low-rise residential and commercial development which currently exists to the northwest, south and west of the area. The existing zoning for these areas is RM-2 . Immediately south of the subject properties on the west side of Collins Avenue is the three lot Block #24 , which contains low-rise residential multi-family buildings facing Collins Avenue. This Block 24 is immediately north of the commercial area between 73rd and 75th Streets, (CD-2) , which is comprised of an existing development pattern of typically low-rise commercial storefronts and businesses fronting on both sides of Collins Avenue. (See Figure 1. on page 5. ) This down-zoning recommendation is partly based on the comprehensive review of the area which is outlined in the "Development Plan and Design Guidelines For The North Beach Neighborhood" , which is authored by Andres Duany & Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, Architects and Urban Planners, and the University of Miami School of Architecture. This plan proposes new low-rise residential development along the west side of Collins Avenue oppite North Shore Open Space Park (NSOSP) from 79th to 86th Street which is immediately north of the subject property. Currently this area contains parking lots for the NSOSP which is the subject of a Comprehensive Plan amendment proposing low-density, low-rise residential development. The plan supports height restrictions and down-zoning for the North Beach area. As the Commission is aware, the RM-1 Zoning District maintains a fifty (50) ft. height restriction, (except in the Architectural District where the maximum permitted height is forty (40) feet) , to maintain the low- rise development pattern within these districts. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt on first reading these companion Ordinances to down- zone the properties on the west side of Collins Avenue from 76th to 79th Streets from RM-2, (Residential Multi Family Medium Intensity) to RM-1, (Residential Multi Family Low Intensity) and amend the maximum permissible F.A.R. on smaller lots to satisfy the settlement agreement. DJG\MHF\DISK#10\1198CM1.94 PAGE 4 OF 5 FIGURE 1. EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS SURROUNDING SUBJECT PROPERTY , _ , --.. -.. --,:Li i gin= --;71-_-_-• T:7.-• IT igg amp .-:"-1-. .---__ ___:1 r; P4if.>‘g ''',1 ' 0milit.071 '. • O a w ` ' �Q Q o Q G C1�=_ y 1E111: Iii"-_, ® kN , ‘ :A- :\:Q�'�a Ada =,�R ` CS EWER �MIMIC MIME_ y17Qy�Q mons o • - .= i ARLY E t t Avc. � y `. 5,4 Ill= SQ NEM!a teMEL �d .T111912OIetrv� i.ilti N's.-C • ' .' AvE:dC:l�l1ddi�✓ O M4111011it . 111 vssztem U .. , al, , a.E m • evaoN AVE y :: ' •tl ' . ,i n AV.t. vv • •-•.:1,-,..1. 'r"1;u ggOrN 1. • ••l. a+� -i--j V i l' I_ t - ail �; i�1 '\ G 1 _ E tc•_,. . -, - t- AVE- +MAR LINO :i F.��.� y tie ; n �_-, 1 ' , .� -- .4 VW' i NMI Mil EMI ERB ,l.. Id .r{ - `' ',• N- d •,NT' _18, r\,'\\\�\\.\���\\. , „.,..„.....:1` 1.: • L PA r GU •• i..• '- a itT 7 1'• f• ;.6,.. Jiw.. 0 NORTH SHORE OPEN SPACE PARK WAR Z f UBJECT PROPERTY PAGE 5 OF 5 t a) u G 4-a cti cl3 O N (1) •r1 a) q0 3 R1 L(( d —I co, O t`, O d 0 N a) bO •• O -Zr U •r1 '-I 4-d • Cr) •rl U) 'd •r1 • O a) at O N 44 a-1 <C a) •r1 or) • r r O H • • H C0 r-1 •r•,-1 -I • 1-1 ,1 G 'd O Z '+a • ,0 01.) 3-) 1-1 �a • x ro rH r ° • 0 0 0 ,1 bO fir• o ul a) a) ..D P4 U �o Rei 'L7 bO N 4-1 CO 4-1 w I U a) •H •r1 0 •ri Q! (A •u .-i a) •r1 a) • co I +- +-1 •