The URL can be used to link to this page

Ordinance 2018-4198NORTH SHORE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT — TATUM WATER EXPANSION ORDINANCE NO. 2018 -4198 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE; AMENDING SECTION 118 -593, "HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGNATION "; AMENDING SECTION 118- 593(e), "DELINEATION ON ZONING MAP "; AMENDING SECTION 118- 593(e)(2), "HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICTS (HPD) ", BY EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TO ADD THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION GENERALLY BOUNDED BY 77TH STREET ON THE SOUTH, HAWTHORNE AVENUE AND CRESPI BOULEVARD ON THE WEST, 87TH STREET ON THE NORTH AND TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE AND BYRON AVENUE ON THE EAST, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING THAT THE CITY'S ZONING MAP SHALL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION; ADOPTING THE DESIGNATION REPORT ATTACHED HERETO AS APPENDIX "A "; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY CODE, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on March 12, 2018, the Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and transmitted a favorable recommendation (7 to 0) for the designation of the North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion to the Planning Board and City Commission; and WHEREAS, on March 27, 2018, the Planning Board held a public hearing and transmitted a recommendation (_ to J for the designation of the North Shore Local Historic District to City Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department has recommended this amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code; and WHEREAS, these recommendations of approval for the designation of the North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion were based upon the information documented in the Designation Report prepared by the City of Miami Beach Planning Department attached hereto as Appendix "A ". NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION. Those certain areas which are generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east; and having the legal description as described 1 herein, are hereby designated as an Historic District of the City of Miami Beach and shall be known as the "North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion." That the Designation Report attached hereto as Appendix "A" is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 118 -593 OF THE CITY CODE. That Chapter 118, Section 118 -593 entitled "Historic Preservation Designation" of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code of Miami Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows: (e) Delineation on zoning map. All sites and districts designated as historic sites and districts shall be delineated on the city's zoning map, pursuant to section 142 -71, as an overlay district. Such sites and districts include: * * * (2) Historic preservation districts (HPD). * * * I. RM -1, CD- 2 /HPD -13: The boundaries of the North Shore Historic District commence at the point of intersection of the centerline of Collins Court and the centerline of 73rd Street, as shown in the HARDING TOWNSITE, recorded in Plat Book 34, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of a tract of land herein described; thence run Northerly, along the centerline of Collins Court to a point of intersection with the Centerline of 75th Street; thence continue Northerly to a point of intersection of the Centerline of Collins Court and the Northern right of way line of 75th Street; thence continue Northerly along the centerline of Collins Court to a point of intersection with the centerline of 87th street; thence run Westerly along the centerline of 87th Street to a point of intersection with the centerline of Harding Avenue; thence run Southerly along the centerline of Harding Avenue to a point of intersection with the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 10, Block 3, as shown in BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Page 25, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence run Westerly along the North line of said lot 10 to a point. Said point being the Northwest corner of said lot 10; thence Southerly along the West line of lots 10, 11, and 12 of block 3 of the aforementioned BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line of 86th street; thence Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 86th street and the West line of lot 10, Block 4 of the aforementioned BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION; thence continue Southerly along the West line 2 of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of said Block 4 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line of 85th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 85th street and the West line of lot 10, Block 5 of the aforementioned BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of said Block 5 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line of 84th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 84th street and the West line of lot 10, Block 6 of the aforementioned BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of said Block 6 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line of 83rd street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 83rd street and the West line of lot 14, Block 3, HAYNSWORTH BEACH SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 41, Page 2, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Thence continue Southerly along the West lines of lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 of said block 3 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line of 81st street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southerly right of way line of 81st street and West line of lot 12, block 7 of ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3, as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of said block 7 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line 80th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 80th street and the West line of lot 12, block 8 of the aforementioned ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of said block 8 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line 79th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 79th street and the West line of lot 12, block 9 of the aforementioned ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of said block 9 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line 78th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 78th street and the West line of lot 12, block 10 of the aforementioned ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of said block 10 to a point of intersection on the Northern right of way line 77th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 77th street and the West line of lot 12, block 11 of the aforementioned ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of said block 11 to a point of intersection on the 3 Northern right of way line 76th street; thence continue Southerly to a point of intersection of the Southern right of way line of 76th street and the West line of lot 6, block 12 of the aforementioned ALTOS DEL MAR NO. 3; thence continue Southerly along the West line of lots 4, 5, and 6 and its Southerly extension of said block 12 to a point of intersection on the centerline of 75th street; thence run Westerly along the centerline of 75th street to a point of intersection on the centerline of Dickens Avenue; thence run Southerly along the centerline of Dickens Avenue to a point of intersection on the centerline of 73rd street; thence run Easterly along the centerline of 73rd street to a point of intersection with the centerline of Collins Court, Said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said lands located, lying and being in Section 2, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, City of Miami Beach, Florida. The boundaries of the North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion commence at the Point of Intersection of the Centerline of Hawthorne Avenue and the Centerline of 77th Street, as shown in the plat of BISCAYNE BEACH SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 48, at Page 53 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County. Said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of a tract of land herein described; Thence run Northerly along the Centerline of Hawthorne Avenue to a Point of Intersection of the Centerline of Hawthorne Avenue and the Centerline of Crespi Boulevard; Thence Northeasterly and Northerly along the Centerline of Crespi Boulevard to a Point of Intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 4, Block 13, of BISCAYNE BEACH SECOND ADDITTION as recorded in Plat Book 46, at Page 39, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; Thence Easterly along said extension of the North line of Lot 4 and along the North line of Lot 4 and its extension over the Tatum Waterway to a Point of Intersection with the Eastern bulkhead line of Tatum Waterway, the same line being the Western line of Block 1, of BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 44, at Page 25, of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida; Thence Northerly along said Western Line of Block 1 to a point being the Northwest corner of the Plat of BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION, the same point being the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said BEACH BAY SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 44, at Page 25, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; Thence Easterly along the North line of Lot 1, Block 1 and its Easterly extension to a Point of Intersection with the Centerline of Byron Avenue; Thence Southerly along the Centerline of Byron avenue to a Point of Intersection of Byron Avenue and 81st street; Thence Westerly along the Centerline of 81st street to a Point of Intersection with the Centerline of Tatum Waterway Drive; Thence southwesterly along the Centerline of Tatum Waterway Drive to a Point of Intersection with the Centerline of 77th street; Thence westerly along the Centerline of 77th 4 street to a Point of Intersection of Centerline 77th Street with the Centerline of Hawthorne Avenue; said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said lands located, lying and being in Section 10, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, and in Section 11, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, City of Miami Beach, Florida. * SECTION 3. INCLUSION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY CODE. It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made part of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention, and the word "Ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word. SECTION 4. AMENDMENT OF ZONING MAP. That the Mayor and City Commission hereby amend the Zoning Map of the City of Miami Beach as contained in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code by identifying the area described herein as HPD -13, Historic Preservation District 13. SECTION 5. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this /Co day of 4 , 2018. ATTEST: 5/2S-; r Raf I E. ranado, City CI rk (Sponsored by the Historic Preservation B First Reading:. April 11, 2018 Second Readi .: May 6, 2 • 1' Verified by: Th'mas R. Moone I - INCORPORATED.: Planning Director Dan Gelber, Mayor i • • • T:WGENDA\2018 \04 April \Planning \Tatum North Sho It L64- sioN, . ' Reading ORD.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION Cily At neyfJ/ 5 3-1 (f, Dote MAM BEACH Ordinances - R5 M COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: May 16, 2018 5:04 p.m. Second Reading Public Hearing SUBJECT: NORTH SHORE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT - TATUM WATER EXPANSION: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE; AMENDING SECTION 118- 593, "HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGNATION "; AMENDING SECTION 118 - 593(E), "DELINEATION ON ZONING MAP "; AMENDING SECTION 118- 593(E)(2), "HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICTS (HPD)," BY EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TO ADD THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION GENERALLY BOUNDED BY 77TH STREET ON THE SOUTH, HAWTHORNE AVENUE AND CRESPI BOULEVARD ON THE WEST, 87TH STREET ON THE NORTH AND TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE AND BYRON AVENUE ON THE EAST, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING THAT THE CITY'S ZONING MAP SHALL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION; ADOPTING THE DESIGNATION REPORT ATTACHED HERETO AS APPENDIX "A "; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY CODE, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the subject Ordinance. ANALYSIS HISTORY On September 9, 2014, the Historic Preservation Board directed Planning Department staff to prepare formal Historic Designation Reports for the proposed designation of the North Shore and Normandy Isles local historic districts, with modified boundaries. At the September 10, 2014 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission discussed the proposed North Shore and Normandy Isles Local Historic Districts and denied the designations. At the July 13, 2016 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission discussed the possibility of creating local historic districts within the boundaries of the North Shore and Normandy Isles National Register Districts and directed the Administration to begin the local designation process for the boundaries recommended in the draft North Beach Master Plan. On October 11, 2016, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Preliminary Evaluation and Page 1124 of 1842 Recommendation Report relative to the possible designation of the North Shore Historic District and directed staff to prepare a Formal Designation Report for the North Shore Local Historic District, with boundaries as recommend in the draft North Beach Master Plan. Pursuant to Section 118 -591 of the City Code, The City Commission was advised of the action of the Historic Preservation Board via LTC, and as part of a progress report on the demolition moratorium, presented at the October 19, 2016 City Commission meeting. On December 5, 2016, the Mayor and City Commission modified the boundaries for the proposed North Shore Historic District by removing the portion of the district along Tatum Waterway Drive and Crespi Boulevard. On September 25, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 2017 - 30013, reaffirming Resolution No. 2016 - 29608, which adopted the North Beach Master Plan as drafted by Dover, Kohl & Partners and commits to the implementation of the entirety of the Plan. The Resolution adopted on September 25, 2017 contains the following `Whereas' clause: WHEREAS, consistent with the Plan, the Mayor and City Commission now feels that it would be in the City's best interest and desires to include the Tatum Waterway area into the North Shore Local Historic District, and continue to create development regulations for the districts that reflect the character of these neighborhoods, while taking into consideration resiliency and sea level rise. On October 10, 2017, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed an historic designation report for the proposed North Shore Local Historic District (attached), consistent with the boundaries as modified by the City Commission on December 5, 2016 (See MAP 1 in the attached Historic Designation Report). At this meeting, the Board transmitted the historic district designation to the Planning Board and City Commission with a favorable recommendation, and directed staff to prepare a preliminary evaluation expanding the North Shore Local Historic District to include the area along Tatum Waterway /Crespi Boulevard as identified in the North Beach Master Plan. On November 21, 2017, the Planning Board reviewed the designation report and unanimously approved a motion (7 to 0) to recommend approval of the designation of the proposed North Shore Historic District. On December 13, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission unanimously approved the designation (7 to 0) of the North Shore Historic District on first reading public hearing and scheduled the second reading public hearing for January 17, 2018. On December 18, 2017, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Preliminary Evaluation and Recommendation Report relative to the possible expansion of the North Shore Historic District and directed staff to prepare a Formal Designation Report for the North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion. The possible expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. On January 17, 2018, the Mayor and City Commission adopted the designation (7 to 0) of the North Shore Historic District on second reading public hearing. On March 12, 2018, the Historic Preservation Board transmitted the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion to the Planning Board and City Commission with favorable recommendation (7 to 0). Page 1125 of 1842 HISTORIC DESIGNATION PROCESS The process of historic designation is delineated in Sections 118 -591 through 118 -593 in Subpart B of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code (Chapter 118, Article X, Division 4). An outline of this process is delineated below. Step One: A request for designation is made either by the City Commission, the Historic Preservation Board, other agencies and organizations as listed in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, or the property owners involved. Proposals for designation shall include a completed application form available from the Planning Department. Step Two: The Planning Department prepares a preliminary evaluation report with recommendations for consideration by the Board. Step Three: The Historic Preservation Board considers the preliminary evaluation to determine if proceeding with a designation report is warranted. The designation report is an historical and architectural analysis of the proposed district or site. The report: 1) describes the historic, architectural and /or archeological significance of the property or subject area proposed for Historical Site or District designation; 2) recommends Evaluation Guidelines to be used by the Board to evaluate the appropriateness and compatibility of proposed Developments affecting the designated Site or District; and 3) will serve as an attachment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. Step Four: The City Commission is notified of the Board's decision and the initial boundaries proposed for designation. Within 60 days of the vote of the Historic Preservation Board to direct the Planning Department to prepare a designation report, the City Commission may, by a five - sevenths vote, deny or modify the proposed request for designation. Step Five: The designation report is presented to the Historic Preservation Board at a public hearing. If the Board determines that the proposed site or district satisfies the requirements for designation as set forth in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, the Board transmits a recommendation in favor of designation to the Planning Board and City Commission. Step Six: The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on the proposed designation, and shall consider the proposed historic designation as an amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code and, subsequently, transmit its recommendation to the City Commission. Step Seven: The City Commission may adopt an amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code by a five - sevenths majority vote, which thereby designates the Historic Preservation Site or Historic District after one (1) public hearing for a parcel of land less than ten (10) contiguous acres or after two (2) public hearings for a parcel of land that is more than ten (10) contiguous acres. PLANNING ANALYSIS IN RELATION TO ORDINANCE CRITERIA 1. In accordance with Section 118 -592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, eligibility for designation is determined on the basis of compliance with the listed criteria set forth below. (a) The Historic Preservation Board shall have the authority to recommend that properties be designated as historic buildings, historic structures, historic improvements, historic landscape features, historic interiors (architecturally significant public portions only), historic sites or historic districts if they are significant in the historical, architectural, cultural, aesthetic or archeological Page 1126 of 1842 heritage of the city, the county, state or nation. Such properties shall possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association and meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the county, state or nation; (2) Association with the lives of persons significant in the city's past history; (3) Embody the distinctive characteristics of an historical period, architectural or design style or method of construction; (4) Possesses high artistic values; (5) Represent the work of a master, serve as an outstanding or representative work of a master designer, architect or builder who contributed to our historical, aesthetic or architectural heritage; (6) Have yielded, or are likely to yield information important in pre- history or history; (7) Be listed in the National Register of Historic Places; (8) Consist of a geographically definable area that possesses a significant concentration of sites, buildings or structures united by historically significant past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development, whose components may lack individual distinction. (b) A building, structure (including the public portions of the interior), improvement or landscape feature may be designated historic even if it has been altered if the alteration is reversible and the most significant architectural elements are intact and repairable. 2. The proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion is eligible for historic designation as it complies with the criteria as specified in Section 118 -592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code outlined above. Staff finds that the properties listed as contributing within the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association for the following reasons: The Planning Department has surveyed the 105 buildings located within the boundaries of the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion and has found that 68 of these buildings satisfy the requirements of Section 118- 593(a) of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. The contributing buildings, which possess integrity of their original location, are mainly examples of modest Post -World War II tourist hotels, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings that constitute a distinctive built environment of resort architecture. The proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion owes much of its character to the repetition of similar building types and styles within a compact space. The largely multi - residential development grew up almost entirely after World War II, and its planning was largely designed around garden oriented apartment buildings emphasizing the simple modern architectural motifs of mid - century America. (a) Further, staff finds the proposed historic district to be eligible for historic designation and in conformance with the designation criteria for the following reasons: (1) Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the Page 1127 of 1842 county, state or nation. The majority of contributing properties within the possible historic district expansion area directly reflect the turn of events in America following World War II. 87 of the 104 buildings within the possible historic district expansion were constructed between 1942 and 1965. Unprecedented development followed the American success in WWII when new resort hotels and residential resort architecture were contemplated. Development during this time was on a scale never before seen in South Florida. This event redefined the evolution of resort architecture in Miami Beach and Florida. Furthermore, Miami Beach played a significant role as a training site and redistribution center for the U.S. Army -Air Forces during World War II. After the war, many veterans who had trained as recruits in Miami Beach returned here to vacation or to make their home. (3) Embody the distinctive characteristics of a historical period, architectural or design style or method of construction. The apartment buildings that characterize much of the built environment of the proposed North Shore Historic District exemplify the plasticity and transparency of Moderne architectural styling and the later Post War Modern movements, featuring cubic massing and large glass casement windows which cross - ventilated each unit and were sheltered by projecting concrete eyebrows. Exterior catwalks and outdoor stairways predicted the more functional building types of the postwar period. Often, two buildings were mirrored, or turned at angles in order to create common garden spaces, and better take advantage of the southern exposure. On the interior, a combination of bedrooms and studio apartments featured dinettes, dressing rooms, and streamlined kitchens. As the district urbanized, it developed an architectural character calibrated to its resort identity, its modest means and its speculative planning. Beginning in the late 1930s, the district was more intensively developed with modern garden apartment building types that sponsored a corresponding urban culture in both the civic and commercial realm. These buildings were adapted to both the narrow Tots and local environment conditions with patios, surrounding gardens, porches, loggias, flat roofs with broad overhanging eaves and exterior staircases and catwalks. These new types, multiplied in large numbers, produce a densely built environment where low -scale buildings allow landscaping to moderate the urban frontages. The scale of architecture along the Tatum Waterway is largely consistent, a product of the fact that a relatively small group of architects constructed much of the area in a short period and literally gave shape to the district. These architects defined a new direction of mid - century modern design in Miami Beach. Their buildings, conditioned to the environmental forces of a hot and humid climate as, well as to the need to distinguish buildings within a competitive environment, led to a daring and unexpected expression of modern themes. (7) Be listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The properties located within the proposed North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion are located within the North Shore Historic District, listed on the National Register of Historic Places on November 18, 2009. (8) Consist of a geographically definable area that possesses a significant concentration of sites, buildings or structures united by historically significant past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development, whose components may lack individual distinction. Nearly 65% of the 105 buildings located within the proposed North Shore Historic District have been Page 1128 of 1842 found to possess architectural and historical significance. In view of the foregoing analysis, staff recommends that the proposed expansion of the North Shore Local Historic District, to include the Tatum Waterway area, be approved. PLANNING BOARD REVIEW The Planning Board is scheduled to review and transmit the proposed Ordinance Amendment on March 27, 2018. The Administration will advise the City Commission of the Planning Board recommendation at First Reading. UPDATE The subject Ordinance was approved at First Reading on April 11, 2018, with no changes. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the subject Ordinance. Legislative Tracking Planning Sponsor Historic Preservation Board ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Designation Report o Ordinance D Ad Page 1129 of 1842 MIAM BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT Staff Report & Recommendation TO: Chairperson and Members Historic Preservation Board FROM: Thomas R. Mooney, AIc Planning Director Historic Preservation Board DATE: March 12, 2018 SUBJECT: HPB17 -0169, Proposed Nort Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion. A presentation by the City of Miami Beach Planning Department to the Historic Preservation Board of an Historic Designation Report relative to the proposed designation Tatum Waterway Expansion of the North Shore Local Historic District. The proposed expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. Following the public hearing, the Historic Preservation Board will vote on whether to recommend designation of the proposed historic district pursuant to Sections 118 -591 through 118 -593 of Subpart B in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Transmit the proposed North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion to the Planning Board and City Commission with a favorable recommendation. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 2017 - 30013, reaffirming Resolution No. 2016 - 29608, which adopted the North Beach Master Plan as drafted by Dover, Kohl & Partners and commits to the implementation of the entirety of the Plan. The Resolution adopted on September 25, 2017 contains the following 'Whereas' clause: WHEREAS, consistent with the Plan, the Mayor and City Commission now feels that it would be in the City's best interest and desires to include the Tatum Waterway area into the North Shore Local Historic District, and continue to create development regulations for the districts that reflect the character of these neighborhoods, while taking into consideration resiliency and sea level rise. On December 18, 2017, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Preliminary Evaluation and Recommendation Report relative to the possible expansion of the North Shore Historic District and directed staff to prepare a Formal Designation Report for the North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion. The possible expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Page 1130 of 1842 Historic Preservation Board HPB17 -0169 — North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion March 12, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. TRM:DJT:JS Page 1131 of 1842 F:\ PLAN\$ HPB1 18HPB \03- 12- 20181HPB17- 0169_North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion.memo.docx NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION b420 61•RON DESIGNATION REPORT MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA Postcard, Multifamily Residential Building, 8420 Byron Avenue Constructed in 1 952, Designed by Norman M. Giller PREPARED BY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MARCH 12, 2018 Page 1132 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 2 of 41 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION REPORT NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION PREPARED BY City of Miami Beach Planning Department MIAMI BEACH CITY COMMISSION Dan Gelber, Mayor Commissioners: Mickey Steinberg Mark Samuelian Michael Gongora Kristen Rosen Gonzalez Ricky Arriola John Elizabeth Aleman Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager Page 1133 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 3 of 41 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Stevan Pardo, Chair Jack Finglass Nancy Liebman Rick Lopez Scott Needelman Kirk Paskal John Stuart CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING BOARD Brian Elias, Chair Michael Barrineau Kareem Brantley Daniel Veitia Mark Meland Nick Gelpi David Wieder CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT AUTHORS Debbie Tackett, Chief of Historic Preservation Jake Seiberling, Principal Planner EDITORS Thomas R. Mooney, AICP, Director Debbie Tackett, Chief of Historic Preservation Jake Seiberling, Principal Planner REPORT DESIGN AND PRODUCTION Debbie Tackett, Chief of Historic Preservation Jake Seiberling, Principal Planner Francisco Arbalaez, Senior Planner Page 1134 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 4 of 41 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION REPORT NORTH SHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. REQUEST 5 II. DESIGNATION PROCESS 6 III. RELATION TO ORDINANCE CRITERIA 7 IV. DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES 12 V. PRESENT OWNERS 12 VI. PRESENT USE 12 VII. PRESENT ZONING 12 VIII. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 12 IX. ARCHITECTURAL BACKGROUND 13 X. BOUNDARY MAP 19 XI. ZONING MAP 20 XII. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 21 XIII. FIGURE INDEX 22 XIV. PROPERTIES LIST 23 XV. PHOTOGRAPHS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DISTRICT 26 Page 1135 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 5 of 41 1. REQUEST On September 9, 2014, the Historic Preservation Board directed Planning Department staff to prepare formal Historic Designation Reports for the proposed designation of the North Shore and Normandy Isles local historic districts, with modified boundaries. At the September 10, 2014 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission discussed the proposed North Shore and Normandy Isles Local Historic Districts and denied the designations. At the July 13, 2016 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission discussed the possibility of creating local historic districts within the boundaries of the North Shore and Normandy Isles National Register Districts and directed the Administration to begin the local designation process for the boundaries recommended in the draft North Beach Master Plan. On October 11, 2016, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Preliminary Evaluation and Recommendation Report relative to the possible designation of the North Shore Historic District and directed staff to prepare a Formal Designation Report for the North Shore Local Historic District, with boundaries as recommend in the draft North Beach Master Plan. Pursuant to Section 1 1 8 -591 of the City Code, The City Commission was advised of the action of the Historic Preservation Board via LTC, and as part of a progress report on the demolition moratorium, presented at the October 19, 2016 City Commission meeting. On December 5, 2016, the Mayor and City Commission modified the boundaries for the proposed North Shore Historic District by removing the portion of the district along Tatum Waterway Drive and Crespi Boulevard, On September 25, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 2017 - 30013, reaffirming Resolution No. 2016- 29608, which adopted the North Beach Master Plan as drafted by Dover, Kohl & Partners and commits to the implementation of the entirety of the Plan. The Resolution adopted on September 25, 2017 contains the following 'Whereas' clause: WHEREAS, consistent with the Plan, the Mayor and City Commission now feels that it would be in the City's best interest and desires to include the Tatum Waterway area into the North Shore Local Historic District, and continue to create development regulations for the districts that reflect the character of these neighborhoods, while taking into consideration resiliency and sea level rise. On October 10, 2017, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed an historic designation report for the proposed North Shore Local Historic District, consistent with the boundaries as modified by the City Commission on December 5, 2016 (MAP 1). At this meeting, the Board transmitted the historic district designation to the Planning Board and City Commission with a favorable recommendation, and directed staff to prepare a preliminary evaluation expanding the North Page 1136 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 6 of 41 Shore Local Historic District to include the area along Tatum Waterway /Crespi Boulevard as identified in the North Beach Master Plan. On November 21, 2017, the Planning Board reviewed the designation report and unanimously approved a motion (7 to 0) to recommend approval of the designation of the proposed North Shore Historic District. On December 13, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission unanimously approved the designation (7 to 0) of the North Shore Historic District on first reading public hearing and scheduled the second reading public hearing for January 17, 2018. On December 18, 2017, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a Preliminary Evaluation and Recommendation Report relative to the possible expansion of the North Shore Historic District and directed staff to prepare a Formal Designation Report for the North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion. The possible expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. On January 17, 201 8, the Mayor and City Commission adopted the designation (7 to 0) of the North Shore Historic District on second reading public hearing. 11. DESIGNATION PROCESS The process of historic designation is delineated in Sections 1 1 8 -591 through 118-593 in Subpart B of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code (Chapter 118, Article X, Division 4). An outline of this process is delineated below. Step One: A request for designation is made either by the City Commission, the Historic Preservation Board, other agencies and organizations as listed in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, or the property owners involved. Proposals for designation shall include a completed application form available from the Planning Department. Step Two: The Planning Department prepares a preliminary evaluation report with recommendations for consideration by the Board. Step Three: The Historic Preservation Board considers the preliminary evaluation to determine if proceeding with a designation report is warranted. The designation report is an historical and architectural analysis of the proposed district or site. The report: 1) describes the historic, architectural and /or archeological significance of the property or subject area proposed for Historical Site or District designation; Page 1137 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 7 of 41 2) recommends Evaluation Guidelines to be used by the Board to evaluate the appropriateness and compatibility of proposed Developments affecting the designated Site or District; and 3) will serve as an attachment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. Step Four: Step Five: Step Six: The City Commission is notified of the Board's decision and the initial boundaries proposed for designation. Within 60 days of the vote of the Historic Preservation Board to direct the Planning Department to prepare a designation report, the City Commission may, by a five - sevenths vote, deny or modify the proposed request for designation. The designation report is presented to the Historic Preservation Board at a public hearing. If the Board determines that the proposed site or district satisfies the requirements for designation as set forth in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, the Board transmits a recommendation in favor of designation to the Planning Board and City Commission. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on the proposed designation, and shall consider the proposed historic designation as an amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code and, subsequently, transmit its recommendation to the City Commission. Step Seven: The City Commission may adopt an amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code by a five - sevenths majority vote, which thereby designates the Historic Preservation Site or Historic District after one (1) public hearing for a parcel of land less than ten (10) contiguous acres or after two (2) public hearings for a parcel of land that is more than ten (10) contiguous acres. III. RELATION TO ORDINANCE CRITERIA 1. In accordance with Section 1 18 -592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, eligibility for designation is determined on the basis of compliance with the listed criteria set forth below. (a) The Historic Preservation Board shall have the authority to recommend that properties be designated as historic buildings, historic structures, historic improvements, historic landscape features, historic interiors (architecturally significant public portions only), historic sites or historic districts if they are significant in the historical, architectural, cultural, aesthetic or archeological heritage of the city, the county, state or nation. Such properties shall possess an integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association and meet at least one (1) of the following criteria: Page 1138 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 8 of 41 Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the county, state or nation; Association with the lives of persons significant in the city's past history; Embody the distinctive characteristics of an historical period, architectural or design style or method of construction; Possesses high artistic values; Represent the work of a master, serve as an outstanding or representative work of a master designer, architect or builder who contributed to our historical, aesthetic or architectural heritage; Have yielded, or are likely to yield information important in pre- history or history; Be listed in the National Register of Historic Places; Consist of a geographically definable area that possesses a significant concentration of sites, buildings or structures united by historically significant past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development, whose components may lack individual distinction. (b) A building, structure (including the public portions of the interior), improvement or landscape feature may be designated historic even if it has been altered if the alteration is reversible and the most significant architectural elements are intact and repairable. 2. The proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion is eligible for historic designation as it complies with the criteria as specified in Section 118-592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code outlined above. Staff finds that the properties listed as contributing within the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association for the following reasons: The Planning Department has surveyed the 105 buildings located within the boundaries of the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion and has found that 68 of these buildings satisfy the requirements of Section 118- 593(a) of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. The contributing buildings, which possess integrity of their original location, are mainly examples of modest Post -World War II tourist hotels, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings that constitute a distinctive built environment of resort architecture. The proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion owes much of its character to the repetition of similar building types Page 1139 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 9 of 41 and styles within a compact space. The largely multi - residential development grew up almost entirely after World War II, and its planning was largely designed around garden oriented apartment buildings emphasizing the simple modern architectural motifs of mid - century America. (a) Further, staff finds the proposed historic district to be eligible for historic designation and in conformance with the designation criteria for the following reasons: (3) Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the county, state or nation. The majority of contributing properties within the possible historic district expansion area directly reflect the turn of events in America following World War II. 87 of the 104 buildings within the possible historic district expansion were constructed between 1942 and 1965. Unprecedented development followed the American success in WWII when new resort hotels and residential resort architecture were contemplated. Development during this time was on a scale never before seen in South Florida. This event redefined the evolution of resort architecture in Miami Beach and Florida. Furthermore, Miami Beach played a significant role as a training site and redistribution center for the U.S. Army -Air Forces during World War II. After the war, many veterans who had trained as recruits in Miami Beach returned here to vacation or to make their home. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a historical period, architectural or design style or method of construction. The apartment buildings that characterize much of the built environment of the possible historic district expansion area exemplify the plasticity and transparency of Moderne architectural styling and the later Post War Modern movements, featuring cubic massing and large glass casement windows which cross - ventilated each unit and were sheltered by projecting concrete eyebrows. Exterior catwalks and outdoor stairways predicted the more functional building types of the postwar period. Often, two buildings were mirrored, or turned at angles in order to create common garden spaces, and better take advantage of the southern exposure. On the interior, a combination of bedrooms and studio apartments featured dinettes, dressing rooms, and streamlined kitchens. As the district urbanized, it developed an architectural character calibrated to its resort identity, its modest means and its speculative planning. Page 1140 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 10 of 41 (7) (8) Beginning in the late 1930s, the district was more intensively developed with modern garden apartment building types that sponsored a corresponding urban culture in both the civic and commercial realm. These buildings were adapted to both the narrow lots and local environment conditions with patios, surrounding gardens, porches, loggias, flat roofs with broad overhanging eaves and exterior staircases and catwalks. These new types, multiplied in large numbers, produce a densely built environment where low -scale buildings allow landscaping to moderate the urban frontages. The scale of architecture along the Tatum Waterway is largely consistent, a product of the fact that a relatively small group of architects constructed much of the area in a short period and literally gave shape to the district. These architects defined a new direction of mid - century modern design in Miami Beach. Their buildings, conditioned to the environmental forces of a hot and humid climate as, well as to the need to distinguish buildings within a competitive environment, led to a daring and unexpected expression of modern themes. Be listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The properties located within the proposed North Shore Local Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion are located within the North Shore Historic District, listed on the National Register of Historic Places on November 18, 2009. Consist of a geographically definable area that possesses a significant concentration of sites, buildings or structures united by historically significant past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development, whose components may lack individual distinction. Nearly 65% of the 105 buildings located within the proposed North Shore Historic District have been found to possess architectural and historical significance. 3. The historic preservation board shall consider if the historic buildings, historic structures, historic improvements, historic landscape features, historic interiors (architecturally significant public portions only), historic sites, or historic districts comply with the sea level rise and resiliency review criteria in Chapter 133, Article II, as applicable, pursuant to Section 118-592. (a) Criteria for ordinances, resolutions, or recommendations: (1) Whether the proposal affects an area that is vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise, pursuant to adopted projections. Page 1141 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 1 1 of 41 The possible historic district expansion area affects properties that are vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise. The adopted projections are the following: At Mean High Water, Sea Level Rise is projected to be (NGVD Elevations): • 2.31 to 2.64 by 2030 (near -term) • 2.98 to 3.98 by 2060 (mid -term) • 4.39 to 6.89 by 2100 (long -term) ESTIMATED from LIDAR and 1995 Partial Building Records indicates the following for the area located to the east of the Tatum Waterway: • Average Existing Crown of Road — 4.56 NGVD • Future Crown of Road — 5.26 NGVD • Average Existing Edge of Pavement — 3.69 NGVD • Future Edge of Pavement — 5.06 NGVD • Average Ground Elevation — 3.90 NGVD ESTIMATED from LIDAR and 1995 Partial Building Records indicates the following for the area located to the west of the Tatum Waterway: • Average Existing Crown of Road — 4.40 NGVD • Future Crown of Road — 5.26 NGVD • Average Existing Edge of Pavement — 3.45 NGVD • Future Edge of Pavement — 5.06 NGVD • Average Ground Elevation — 3.96 NGVD The estimated Lidar data indicates the majority of the subject properties have ground elevations that are currently at a level below the future crown of road elevation. (2) Whether the proposal will increase the resiliency of the City with respect to sea level rise. (3) In order for the historic district expansion to increase the resiliency of the City, substantial alterations, adaptive re -use and /or redevelopment of many of the properties will likely be required. A suitable level of flexibility will be necessary in reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for alterations, demolition, additions to existing buildings and new construction in order for the properties to meet current and future Building Codes and the City's resiliency standards. Whether the proposal is compatible with the City's sea level rise mitigation and resiliency efforts. In order for the historic district expansion to be compatible with the City's sea level rise mitigation and resiliency efforts, substantial alterations, adaptive re -use and /or redevelopment of the subject properties will likely Page 1142 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 12 of 41 be required. A suitable level of flexibility will be necessary in reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for alterations, demolition, additions to existing buildings and new construction in order for the properties to meet current and future Building Codes and to be consistent with the City's resiliency initiatives. IV. DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES The proposed historic district expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. (MAP 1) V. PRESENT OWNERS The properties located within the boundaries of the proposed historic district expansion area are held by multiple owners. VI. PRESENT USE Multi- family residential is the primary use within the boundaries of the proposed historic district expansion area. VII. PRESENT ZONING The established zoning districts within the boundaries of proposed historic district are as follows: RM -1 Residential Multifamily, Low Intensity Please refer to the zoning map for more detailed information. (MAP 2) VIII. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND While the end of World War I spurred the subdivision and planning of North Beach, the majority of the area located within the North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion was not subdivided or developed until after World War II. The last major subdivisions in North Beach were developed between 1944 and 1947. The Beach -Bay Subdivision (Harry Sirkin, 1944), Biscayne Beach (Milton and Esther Steinhardt, 1945) and the 17 -acre Tatum Waterway Subdivision (Jacob and Claire Freidus' Branch Corporation, 1946) largely completed the planning of the Tatum Waterway area. The Tatum Waterway Subdivision which extends from 776 Street to 81' Street, running from Byron Avenue to the Tatum Waterway, was the last major subdivision to be platted within the City of Miami Beach.' 1 "Beach Tract Goes On Sale," The Miami Herald, December 1, 1946, p. c -1. Page 1143 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 13 of 41 Figure 1 1941 Aerial Photograph of the Tatum Waterway /North Shore area. Figure 2 1954 Aerial Photograph of the Tatum Waterway /North Shore area. Prior to the 1940s, the and surrounding the Tatum Waterway was intended to be developed as part of a massive commercial coconut farm on and that extended north up the Florida coast for approximately 100 miles. Henry B Lum purchased this land from the Federal Government prior to the turn of the century for 35 cents per acre.2 Along with partners Ezra Osborn and Elnathan T. Field from New Jersey, Lum succeeded in planting only approximately 155,000 coconut palms from Cape Florida to just north of Jupiter. During the time between the early 1900s and the early 1940s, the City's population exploded to approximately 33,000 and and values soared to an assessed value of $92,600,000.3 The changing economy and demand for housing and tourist lodging following the end of WWII, made the Tatum Waterway area attractive for development. IX. ARCHITECTURAL BACKGROUND The majority of buildings located within the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion area were designed in the Post War Modern style of architecture. These 2 Ibid 3 Ibid Page 1144 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 14 of 41 buildings include mostly multi - family residential buildings that constitute a distinctive built environment of resort architecture. Stylistically, the architecture ranges from purely functional to highly expressive. The Tatum Waterway neighborhood owes much of its character to the repetition of similar building types and styles within a compact space. Post War Modern The Post War Modern style of architecture in South Florida, which spans from approximately 1945 to the mid- 1960s, is often interchangeably referred to as Miami Modern (MiMo) or Mid - Century Modern, the latter being a more nationally recognized term. Regardless of name, the historic design impact of this mid -20th century style can be seen today throughout South Florida and beyond. In order to better understand the Post War Modern or style of architecture, it is important to view this architectural movement in the context of the historical, political, social, economic, and technological changes that were taking place during this period worldwide, nationwide, and locally. • The United States emerged as a world power following World War II. After years of deprivation during the Great Depression and wartime, the end of the war brought a sense of joyful optimism to many Americans. The Baby Boom was the result of the eagerness to get this new generation underway, while the legislation of the G.I. Bill helped to provide education and prosperity for war veterans. Miami Beach played a significant role as a training site and redistribution center for the U.S. Army -Air Forces during World War II. The immediate availability of the City as a training center in 1942 is credited with reducing the length of the war effort by six to eight months and saving the government $6 million in building costs. 'After the war, many veterans who had trained as recruits in • • Figure 3 Postcard depicting Army Air Force solders marching on Collins Avenue. Miami Beach returned here to vacation or to make their home. This, in addition to the Cuban Revolution in 1959, which prompted an unprecedented mass immigration of Cubans to Miami, resulted in a need for housing, retail, and services to accommodate the different growing segments of the population increased. 4 "Army Life on Beach in Second Year," Miami Herald, 19 February 1943. Page 1145 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 15 of 41 America redirected its enormous industrial capacity from the defense economy back to the domestic economy following the war. There was no longer a perceived need for rationing, conserving, and recycling. The economy was thriving and gave rise to the growing middle class. New electric appliances and gadgets with push buttons began to appear in many households. Air conditioning was introduced as a modern convenience that tremendously added to the comforts of living in Florida. It became especially important because air conditioning allowed for a year - round economy and freed architects from having to adapt their buildings to the hot, humid climate. It was the beginning of the space age. The first Sputnik was launched in 1957. Rivalry with the U.S.S.R. led to the space race. Futuristic, flamboyant, fun design elements showed up in cars, furniture, and buildings. Automobiles sprouted wings and depicted rocket motifs. The small globe with protruding antennae reminiscent of the Sputnik became a common design detail. Cheese holes, woggles and boomerangs began to appear in architecture everywhere in Miami Beach. After a hiatus in construction due to World War II, the Post War Modern style picked up where Art Deco left off with the added influences of a booming Post War economy, new technologies, the prevalence of the sophisticated, affordable, and reliable new automobiles, and a feeling of national optimism. The local expression of this style was dubbed Miami Modern or MiMo by the Greater Metropolitan Miami area's Urban Arts Committee in about 2004. Large-at Modem Olympic Salt Water Sw m ning goof and Cabana Colottg 11 17 h S1. and Tatum Waterway nye hatami Beach 41 rtor da ira the Hcsrt of Fashionable North Rea King Size 3 -4 -5 Room Furm trod ur tJo Yr ns; Apartments Prwote tk oiing and `ishirrg Di Open AS Year -- Tel. 86.-255I POST `D Figure 4 Postcard for Drake Villas located at 77th Street and Tatum Waterway Drive. The Tatum Waterway area was almost entirely built up after World War II. Buildings emphasized horizontality, exhibiting flat roofs with broad overhanging eaves, echoed by the horizontal projections of the exterior corridors and anchored to the ground with long low planter boxes. Individual windows were grouped together with projecting concrete bands and contrasting textures to create bold patterns. Space -age design elements were employed in clustered pipe columns and angled roofs that resembled delta wings. Often two or more contrasting materials, such as stone, brick, mosaic tile or patterned stucco were used to create bold designs. In addition, decorative metal railings and concrete screen block were often used to wrap around intimate garden patios which conveyed an architectural sensibility characteristic of the middleclass, tropical resort that flourished in the North Beach area. Page 1146 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 16 of 41 Architects adapted to the tropical climate by introducing exterior stairways and corridors permitting natural cross - ventilation to each dwelling. Large numbers of modern, garden -style apartment buildings were built between 1945 and 1963. Generally built on a single lot, most of the apartment buildings were one or two stories in height with front patios and side gardens. On larger lots, the linear configuration of garden apartments was articulated to form L, C, or J shapes, or featured iwo mirrored buildings to create generous, private courtyards. The building type adapted to both the narrow lot structure of the city and local environment conditions with patios, surrounding gardens, porches, loggias, flat roofs with broad overhanging eaves and exterior staircases and catwalks. These small garden apartment buildings multiplied in large numbers, produce a densely built environment where low -scale buildings allow landscaping to moderate the urban frontages. The scale of architecture in the district is largely consistent; a product of the fact that so much of the area was constructed in a short period of time by a relatively small group of architects. Larger assemblages of narrow, single - bar type buildings were also possible. North Shore's most expansive project, the Drake Villas along Tatum Waterway Drive (Donald Smith and Irvin Korach, 1948), was designed to comprise a campus of more than 23 buildings spread out across more than 2,000 linear feet of water frontage. Developed by Jacob Freidus, the developer of the Tatum Waterway Subdivision, the buildings were grouped to frame patios and courts, pool and cabana areas, tennis courts and a solarium. The Drake ensemble was constructed of a single building module that eschewed Miami's vernacular masonry and wood construction, instead employing entirely concrete construction for both walls and floor slabs. About 13 buildings were finally built, and while these buildings were executed by the same architect, they nevertheless provided a great variety of details, particularly in the elaboration of guard rails. (715 -725 78th St., 7819 -7809 Tatum Waterway Drive)5 VU aoeorvierort rrr .0,r to a a Au a. w V� OP sac-no • TVPeae ROY—AZe Figure 5 Plat of the Tatum Waterway Subdivision, filed on November 29, 1946. 5 "Beach Gets $5,000,000 Development," The Miami Herald, May 2, 1948. Page 1147 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 17 of 41 Architects Architects, Gilbert M. Fein, Gerard Pitt, Leonard Glasser and Donald G. Smith dominated the new construction, while others like Frank Wyatt Woods, Harry O. Nelson, Joseph DeBrita, and Manfred Ungaro were also quite influential. Together, these architects defined a new direction of Mid - Century Modern design in Miami Beach. Their buildings, conditioned to the environmental forces of a hot and humid climate as well as to the need to distinguish buildings within a competitive environment, led to a daring and unexpected expression of modern themes. While the vast majority of the proposed district can be characterized as Post War Modern, this style nonetheless demonstrates a high degree of continuity with earlier architectural trends, including Vernacular, Mediterranean and Streamline Moderne style buildings. Several of Miami Beach's distinguished local architects are represented in the potential district expansion area, including the following: Gilbert M. Fein (1920 -2003) was from New York City and studied architecture at New York University. He served in the Army Corps of Engineers during World War II and settled in Miami Beach after the war. He designed hundreds of residential and commercial buildings in South Florida in the new Postwar style, becoming "one of the masters of Modernism." Most of Fein's comfortably livable buildings are unassuming and not prominent landmarks, but some of the better -known are: Starlite Hotel News Cafe Helen Mar Annex Lake View Apartments Park Isle Club 750 Ocean Drive 800 Ocean Drive 2445 Lake Pancoast Drive 4780 Pinetree Drive 780 73rd Street Gerard Pitt (1 885 -1971) was born in New Rochelle, New York, and graduated from Columbia University in 1907. In his early career he worked in New York City and Detroit. He moved to Miami in 1930 and was in partnership with George L. Pfeiffer, 1940 -41. Pitt served as supervising architect for the southeast district of the Florida Hotel Commission from 1935 to 1957. In Miami Beach, he designed dozens of mostly small -scale apartment buildings in Art Deco and Postwar Modern styles from 1940 to the late 1960s, when he was in his 80s. These include: Lincoln Arms Miljean Tropical Gardens Clifton Hotel 1800 James Ave. 1 831 James Ave. 1600 Collins Ave. 1343 Collins Ave. Nathan A. Seiderman (1908 -2002) had an office on Normandy Isle and worked mostly in North Beach, designing at least 32 apartment buildings there from 1951 to 1959. He also designed the Fairfax Apartments at 1776 Collins Avenue in 1951. He later moved to Los Angeles, California, and died in 2002. Page 1148 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 18 of 41 Donald G. Smith (1906 -1967) was born in Indiana and educated at Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. In 1938, he established a private practice in Miami Beach. The Royal Palm Hotel in Miami Beach was one of his earliest and best works. He also designed the Lynmar Hotel and the Metropole Hotel in South Beach and dozens of small residences and apartment houses throughout the city. In the post -war years he formed a well -known partnership with Irvin Korach. Page 1149 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 19 of 41 MAP 1: Proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Boundaries Proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion w z 0 w w > d_ 0 z" z ce CL co North Shore Historic District w Q w u) -J < Z. CL CL 0 U CO 87TH ST 85TH ST HARDING AVE 83TH ST w N 0 z J J U 79TH ST 77TH ST 75TH ST 73RD ST CITY Ll ATLANTIC OCEAN Page 1150 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 20 of 41 MAP 2: Zoning Districts within the Proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Boundaries and Surrounding Areas. RM -2 uPfMST .: CITY LIMIT GU RS -4 TH Proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion 85TH'. ST RS -4 z 0 GU RM -1 0 mGU GU 8311-1 ST FR G Q- w z .J J 0 GU AMA North Shore Historic District GU S -4 RS -3 77Ttrsl " ATLANTIC OCEAN Page 1151 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 21 of 41 X. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Criteria for Designation: The Planning Department finds the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion to be in compliance with the Criteria for Designation listed in Section 118 -592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. 2. Site Boundaries: The proposed historic district expansion area is generally bounded by 77th Street on the south, Hawthorne Avenue and Crespi Boulevard on the west, 87th Street on the north and Tatum Waterway Drive and Byron Avenue on the east. (MAP 1) 3. Areas Subject to Review: The Planning Department recommends that the areas subject to review shall include all exterior building elevations and public interior spaces, site and landscape features, public open spaces and public rights - of -way, and all vacant or parking lots included within the boundaries of the proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion. Regular maintenance of public utilities, drainage, and mechanical systems, sidewalks, and roadways shall not require a Certificate of Appropriateness. 4. Review Guidelines: The Planning Department recommends that a decision on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be based upon compatibility of the physical alteration or improvement with surrounding properties and where deemed applicable in substantial compliance with the following: a. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, as revised from time to time; b. Other guidelines /policies /plans adopted or approved by resolution or ordinance by the City Commission; c. All additional criteria as listed under Sections 1 18- 564(b), 1 1 8- 564(c) and 133 -50(a) in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code; d. A suitable level of flexibility will be necessary in reviewing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for alterations, demolition, and additions to existing buildings and new construction in order to ensure the revitalization and resiliency of this unique and low -lying area of the City; e. City of Miami Beach Design Guidelines as adopted by the Joint Design Review /Historic Preservation Board on October 12, 1993, amended June 7, 1994, as may be revised from time to time. Page 1152 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 22 of 41 XI. FIGURE INDEX Figure 0: Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: (Cover) Jake Seiberling & Debbie Tackett Private Collection, Miami Beach, Florida. "8420 Byron Ave. Miami Beach, Florida ", Postcard, Not Postmarked, K6334. City of Miami Beach Public Works Department, Engineering survey of the City of Miami Beach, photographs, 1941. City of Miami Beach Public Works Department, Engineering survey of the City of Miami Beach, photographs, 1954. Jake Seiberling & Debbie Tackett Private Collection, Miami Beach, Florida. "D.C. 135 — "Off to Study," Army Air Forces, Miami Beach, Fla. ", Postcard, Not Postmarked, 2B -H581. Division, Aerial Division, Aerial Figure 4: Colourpicture Publication, Boston, Massachusetts, "Drake Villas ", Postcard, Postmarked August 17, 1957, K2978. Figure 5: City of Miami Beach Public Works Department, Engineering Division, "Plat of Tatum Waterway Subdivision ", 1946. Page 1153 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 23 of 41 XII. PROPERTIES LIST Proposed North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Properties List Address Year Architect Style National Register Classification Local Classification 8100 BYRON AV 1980 Oscan Sklar Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8142 BYRON AV 1939 T. Hunter Henderson Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Non Contributing Contributing 8200 BYRON AV 1939 T. Hunter Henderson Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Non Contributing Contributing 8210 BYRON AV 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8230 BYRON AV 1941 T. Hunter Henderson Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Contributing Contributing 8240 BYRON AV 1941 T. Hunter Henderson Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Contributing Contributing 8250 BYRON AV 1977 Jorge Dorta Duque Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8260 BYRON AV 1946 Martin Houri Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8300 BYRON AV 1949 Robert M. Little Post War Modern Contributing Non Contributing 8310 BYRON AV 1949 Robert M. Little Post War Modern Contributing Non Contributing 8320 BYRON AV 1951 Norman M. Giller Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8330 BYRON AV 1951 August Swarz Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8340 BYRON AV 1951 August Swarz Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8350 BYRON AV 1951 August Swarz Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8400 BYRON AV 1966 Charles H. Markel Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8420 BYRON AV 1952 Norman M. Giller Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8430 BYRON AV 1951 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8440 BYRON AV 1950 Manfred M. Ungaro Style not determined Contributing Non Contributing 8500 BYRON AV 1951 Manfred M. Ungaro Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8530 BYRON AV 1978 J. A. Ferradaz Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8540 BYRON AV 1951 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8550 BYRON AV 1951 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8600 BYRON AV 1952 Leonard H. Glasser Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8620 BYRON AV 1950 Leonard H. Glasser Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8630 BYRON AV 1950 Leonard H. Glasser Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7751 CRESPI BL 1949 J. Richard Ogden Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7757 CRESPI BL 1947 J. Richard Ogden Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7765 CRESPI BL 1951 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7775 CRESPI BL 1952 Nathan A. Seiderman Style not determined Contributing Non Contributing 7805 CRESPI BL 1956 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7815 CRESPI BL 1956 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7825 CRESPI BL 1957 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7835 CRESPI BL 1957 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7849 CRESPI BL 1947 T. Hunter Henderson Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7859 CRESPI BL 1947 T. Hunter Henderson Post War Modern Contributing Contributing Page 1154 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 24 of 41 Address Year Architect Style National Register Classification Local Classification 7861 CRESPI BL A 1952 Lester Avery Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7861 CRESPI BL B 1952 Lester Avery Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7871 CRESPI BL A 1952 Lester Avery Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7871 CRESPI BL B 1952 Lester Avery Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7879 CRESPI BL 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Non Contributing 7905 CRESPI BL 1947 John E. Petersen Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 7915 CRESPI BL 1948 Carlos B. Schoeppl Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7919 CRESPI BL 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7925 CRESPI BL 1947 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7935 CRESPI BL 1947 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7945 CRESPI BL 1952 Borry & David Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 7955 CRESPI BL 1952 Borry & David Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 7959 CRESPI BL 1972 Alberto Lauderman Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7965 CRESPI BL 1952 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Non Contributing 7975 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7985 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7995 CRESPI BL 1954 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8001 CRESPI BL 1968 Jorge Dorta Duque Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8011 CRESPI BL 1955 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8021 CRESPI BL 1957 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8025 CRESPI BL 1950 August Swarz Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8035 CRESPI BL 1959 Nathan A. Seiderman Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8101 CRESPI BL 1969 Jorge Dorta Duque Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8109 CRESPI BL 1956 Theodore Gottfried Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8119 CRESPI BL 1951 Norman M. Giller Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8125 CRESPI BL 1970 Roberto Gambach Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8135 CRESPI BL 1950 T. Hunter Henderson Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8141 CRESPI BL 1949 T. Hunter Henderson Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8205 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8215 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8220 CRESPI BL 1956 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8221 CRESPI BL 1956 Don Reiff Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8227 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8235 CRESPI BL 1953 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8271 CRESPI BL 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8305 CRESPI BL 1969 Gail Byron Balwin Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8321 CRESPI BL 1951 Norman M. Giller Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8329 CRESPI BL 1951 Norman M. Giller Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8335 CRESPI BL 1948 Harry 0. Nelson Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8401 CRESPI BL 1948 Harry 0. Nelson Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8415 CRESPI BL 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8421 CRESPI BL _ 2018 CDS Architecture Contemporary Not Classified Non Contributing Page 1155 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 25 of 41 Address Year Architect Style National Register Classification Local Classification 8435 CRESPI BL 1961 Manfred M. Ungaro Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8501 CRESPI BL 1960 Charles H. Markel Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8509 CRESPI BL 1960 Charles H. Markel Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7707 HAWTHORNE AV A 1950 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing Non Contributing 7707 HAWTHORNE AV B 1950 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Contributing _ Non Contributing 7717 HAWTHORNE AV 1950 Gilbert M. Fein Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 7735 HAWTHORNE AV 1949 J. Richard Ogden Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7741 HAWTHORNE AV 1949 J. Richard Ogden Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7700 TATUM WATERWAY DR 2016 Beilinson Gomez Contemporary Not Applicable Non Contributing 7710 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7720 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1947 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7740 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1947 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7750 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1947 Frank W. Woods Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Contributing Contributing 7760 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1947 Frank W. Woods Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Contributing Contributing 7770 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1947 Frank W. Woods Med Rev /Art Deco Transitional Contributing Contributing 7780 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7790 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7800 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7810 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7820 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1948 Donald G. Smith Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7900 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1972 Isaac Sklar Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 7930 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 7950 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8000 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1962 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8010 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1963 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Non Contributing Non Contributing 8024 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1969 Not listed Style not determined Non Contributing Non Contributing 8040 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1963 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing 8080 TATUM WATERWAY DR 1957 Gerard Pitt Post War Modern Contributing Contributing Page 1156 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 26 of 41 XIII. PHOTOGRAPHS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DISTRICT 8100 BYRON AVENUE 8210 BYRON AVENUE Page 1157 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 27 of 41 8310 BYRON AVENUE 8320 BYRON AVENUE Page 1158 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 28 of 41 8350 BYRON AVENUE 8420 BYRON AVENUE Page 1159 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 29 of 41 8440 BYRON AVENUE 8500 BYRON AVENUE Page 1160 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 30 of 41 8600 BYRON AVENUE 7765 CRESPI BOULEVARD Page 1161 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 31 of 41 7775 CRESPI BOULEVARD 7825 CRESPI BOULEVARD Page 1162 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 32 of 41 7965 CRESPI BOULEVARD 7985 CRESPI BOULEVARD Page 1163 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 33 of 41 8025 CRESPI BOULEVARD 8035 CRESPI BOULEVARD Page 1164 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 34 of 41 8205 CRESPI BOULEVARD 8271 CRESPI BOULEVARD Page 1165 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 35 of 41 8415 CRESPI BOULEVARD 7717 HAWTHORNE AVENUE Page 1166 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 36 of 41 7700 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE 7720 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE Page 1167 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 37 of 41 7740 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE 7760 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE Page 1168 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 38 of 41 7800 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE 7930 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE Page 1169 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 39 of 41 8040 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE 8080 TATUM WATERWAY DRIVE Page 1170 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 40 of 41 VIEWS ALONG THE WATERWAY Waterway View 1 Waterway View 2 Page 1171 of 1842 North Shore Historic District Tatum Waterway Expansion Designation Report Page 41 of 41 Waterway View 3 U Waterway View 4 Page 1172 of 1842 NEIGHBORS z 0 z cc u" W 0 FE 2 ZZ CC W © I CO m V W Q co z u. LL O 0 0 z E �°- W O 1' Q y 0 I z z CC 0 -J CC _ O LU 0 co LLJ Z H ce 0 z -< H May 16, 2018 E O as co 2 o N a� U T ca 2 c 0 O c o -O co O E 0 c >m U' -o m 0 2 ca Sc ❑ a)0.. N U c O s a) .0 o = U 0 a 0) o 0 — 0 x ars 0 L ao O .0 c V U � � L TS E E 0 L .L c a5 o fu O N o .0 0 E a) c E o U CO o W c m la ci i O _ _o _.c a. F d' O a) 0 Z c t!1 NORTH SHORE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT — TATUM WATERWAY EXPANSION: I- -z w w Z 0 ZZ0c❑0F -Ww W O- 0 W W❑ U Q Li- Q> (/) > Z W Q W OZOC Qz❑H� W W H W> W< W Cr >Wuj cc <2H 0 0- z z 0 w 0 O z z U w_ cc co w U QoE HQm�°Cr W < O ❑ _ ❑ < 0 F- F- > y❑ S Z 1 W S Q F— Q Z0 - 00 ><0~ ❑0r`� ~0c200 waw�1 O000 2 0 rn Fc H Z w Z Q 0 cb- 0 0 H 1- 0() F-W 0J [C—r0wQ co Z❑ OJ POE- iii F_ }dw LLc HHu)2(j0li = rn 0 U) D ❑ F- <00Ct =F-¢ =¢w uj UJ f•-- Z❑ m< S Z O 0 ❑ W W H z Z W w < Cc O 0U) CC =OO }p H 0- Z m z �¢ z Z Q W 0 ' L.LJO 1 -JHaLw S Z 0 H Q Z Q S � W Z w CC Q Z Sz O z w O Q N W = I- O O LU (j - CO U 1 0 z z z S m 1- 0 U m 0 W x w • o >- W W (n❑ U_ ill 1 -U7S }w UC�~Q U¢ W H< >- CZp ❑W O(7wmO w Z m Z w H Q c>> W ❑F_ hSOF- O¢ Q 0 U W 0 a W < LnW d2 crccz LL 2 ao S < < W r w =}Q<CLCO' z H w z m LL LL 0.O o o ❑ U O O _ b 0 E 0 2 0LU¢ 0z'))1C)cc <w <F- OZd S ~ ¢Z- UW(jWm o< 6 U E m< 0 O< irDzac00wDww 00 Lit c~j❑U7 J > z w ncz 2 w w ¢CC ¢ -62¢F —z2A 1 .,., o O a) c E .0 o O M O LL L M a ro E o 0 0 0 N N M 'O a 0 p 0) -0 a) 02 - O ) O N - o- a a 0.0 > w.- o0 0 o a •? ) 2 .0 O L O ❑ = LL 0. 'O O N .0 U 5 01 -0 0 N U . -oo .0 > .N o _ 0 o 0 c 0 0 c.0 c a) 0 V c m a w E y O U Q c 17 ja) c O a U U : o L 0 0 o 0 O c °— c 22 t _ 0U. U 2 c 0 U 5 0 c c a > N ... - c 0 J 00 hO O. O 0 O -00 "p 0 „co o .. 0- .o O c 0 E N a aUi a) c w 'o .o o co ID U m 'o 0 7 0 ro .. c -.2 > 4.6 U > ) -0 ca O O sr °' 0 0' o ro 0 0 c C .0 ❑ 0 >, p 0 co (0 0 `O ._ N 0 (1)) 0 0- F- O U m o E s C .LO- O 0 0.5 w o ° c ° c ro co O .0) E o° U . w 0 N p E ..'O_ .0 L a 3 o N V) co N . � ro a) E a c o N o. 0 L o 0 : •o O c � �E o- 0 F- o L .co E 0) 0 RS E o V 0000 c 0 E 0 N.0 0 0. a)2cn ,--o ti (j > ro�a a 0 c o: al • o ro 0° m 0❑ c u-o U 0 O CO L O 0 c O w 0 c T c 5 . •-- ccuu W (1) m 0 0 c N .0 c 3 .2 0 -Q N 0 m N O o • .-0 d O) ..O 1.5 c O O t c0) o a .c ccaa , c u) 0 E 0 0 0 c 0 H ._ g 0 E o 0 o c o 0 3 - 5 v) a) c a° co c 6 0 0 '� o a w O- (r N S 0 i= c o O ro Fes- -0 z' >0.EH d N c0 aa._ m on access for ' - o • o. N . U c. 0) U ro o c C) A CC ca N 0 c 'a O) a) O O > LL 5 ct. o 0) ca • O > — c O E ° E E 0 C • U U co a) m 0) .0 c O m Oi :E 0 c vi o 0) a = o N -Q U F— 'O co Ad 0516218 -03 rayC I i r o UI I04L