Resolution 7688 r
RESOLUTION NO. 7688
WHITEWAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WW-86 WW-86
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, met
on July 6th, 1951, pursuant to the notice under Sections 29 and 30 of
theCharter of the said City to hear all written objections to the confirm-
ation of the preliminary assessment roll of Whiteway Improvement WW-86,
District WW-86, by any person whose property is described in said preliminary
assessment roll, which roll was filed with said City Council on June 8, 1951,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council, having received no written objections filed
to the confirmation of said preliminary assessment roll by any person whose
property is described in said roll,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Miami Beach,
Florida, that the prima facie assessments as indicated on said preliminary
assessment roll, be and the same are in allthings confirmed and sustained
against any and all lots or parcels of ground described therein except as
to the following described lots or parcels against which said assessment is
modified and reduced , the amount by which said assessment is hereby reduced
being hereby charged to the City at large, so that the assessment shall be
as follows, it being hereby decided that the special benefits to said lots
on account of the reasons given, are those benefits as stated below, after
such reduction and modification:
MODIFICATION AND REDUCTION OF ASSESSMENTS
IN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WHITEWAY DISTRICT
WW-86
DESCRIPTION REASON FOR PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AFTER
ADJUSTMENT ASSESSMENT MODIFICATION AND
ADJUSTMENT
Ocean Beach Addition No. 3
as per plat recorded in Plat
Book 2, at Page 81, of the
Public Records of Dade County, Fla.
W. 38' Lots 1 & 2,
Block 53 1/2 frontage 100.0 ' @ 2.11172 50.0 ' @ 2.11172
$211.17 $105.59
That part of Lot 3
described as follows :
beginning at a point on
S .line said Lot 3,116' w.
of s.e. corner of said Lot 3,
thence run in a NE 'ly direction
to a point on n. line of said
Lot 3, 125' w. of/ N.E. corner of
said Lot 3, thence run W. and along
the north line of said Lot 3 a distance
of 106.6' M.L. to the N.W. corner of
said Lot 3, thence run south and along
the west line of said Lot 3 a distance
of 50 ' to 0.W. corner of said Lot 3,
thence run E'ly and along the S. line
of said Lot 3 a distance of 104.75 M.L.
to place of beginning,
Block 53 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 ` 52.79
W.102.2 ' Lot 4,
Block 53 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
-1-
DESCRIPTION REASON FOR PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AFTER
ADJUSTMENT ASSESSMENT MODIFICATION AND
ADJUSTMENT
Lot 5, Block 53 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105. 58 $52.79
W. 1/2 of W.1/2
Lot 9, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.00 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 10, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.00 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 11, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.00 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 12, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.00 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105. 58 $52.79
Lot 13, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 14, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 15, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
Lot 16, Block 54 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.58 $52.79
W.47 ' Lot 9,
Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
1 Lot 10, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 11, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 12, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 13, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 14, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 15, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 16, Block 55 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.79
Lot 7, Block 56 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.80
Lot 8, Block 56 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.80
Lot 9, Block 56 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.80
Lot 10, Block 56 1/2 frontage 50.0 ' @ 2.11172 25.0 ' @ 2.11172
$105.59 $52.80
-2-
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT
3N W-84
DESCRIPTION REASON FOR PhESEIT RECOMMENDED
Lot 3, Block 75 1/2 frontage 50.01 6 2.11172 25.1 ter 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 4, Block 75 1/2 frontage 50.01 6 2.11172 25.1 v 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 5, Block 75 1/2 frontage 50.01 k,-, 2.11172 25.1 k>= 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 6, Block 75 1/2 frontage 50.01 0 2.11172 25.1 G 2.11172
105,56 52.79
Lot 1, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 kii 2.11172 25.1 t 2.11172
105.56 52.79
Lot 2, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 '. 2.11172 25.1 4 2.11172
105.58 52.79
Lot 3, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 o 2.11172 25.1 t 2.11172
105.58 52.79
Lot 4, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 4 2.11172 25.1 4 2.11172
105.58 52.79
Lot 5, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 2.11172 25.1 a 2.11172
105.58 52,79
Lot 6, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 6 2.11172 25.01 V 2.11172
105.58 52.79
Lot 7, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.01 % 2.11172 25.01 4 2.11172
105.59 52.60
Lot 8, Block 76 1/2 frontage 50.1 4 2.11172 25.1 Q 2 .11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 1, Block 77 1/2 frontage 50.1 4 2,11172 25.1 6 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 2, Block 77 1/2 frontage 50.1 4 2.11172 25. 1 : 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 3, lees W. 561 1/2 frontage 50.1 4 2.11172 25.1 t 2.11172
Block ?7 105.59 52.80
Lot 4, Block It 1/2 frontage 50.1 2.11172 25.1 C; 2.11172
105.59 52.80
Lot 5, Block 77 1/2 frontage 50.1 e. 2.11172 25.1 4 2.11172
105.59 52.80
-3_
-
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADJUSTICIIT
1TRSCRIPTT0r REASON FOR ?Ra! EECO 1ENDBD
loot 6, Block 77 1/2 frontage 50.' int 2.11172 25.1 c 2.11172
105.59 52.79
,ot 7, Block 77 1/2 frontage 50.' 0, 2.11172 25.1 6 : 2.11172
105.59 52.79
E.70' Lot 8, 1/2 frontage 50.1 a 2.11172 25.1 2.11172
Block 77 • 105.59 52.79
...601 Lot 1, 1/2 frontage 50.1 G 2.11172 25. 1 2.11172
Block 78 105.59 52.79
Lot 2, Block 78 1/2 frontage 50., oi 2.11172 25.1 € 2.11172
105.59 52.79
Lot 3, Block 78 1/2 frontage 50. ' t 2.11172 25. 1 2.11172
105.59 52.79
Lots 4 & 5, 1/2 frontage 100.001 ti 2.11172 50.0' a 2.11172
Block 78 211.17 105.58
with man's re-'
s ubd iv inion of Lots
10,11 & 12, Block 83
& Lots 11 & 12, .Block
56, Ocean Beach-Addi-
tion No. 3(as per pkat
recorded to Plat Book
9, Page 10, of the
Public Records of
Dade County, Fla.
Lot 1 & V.10' 1/2 frontage 90,,1 Es 2.11172 45. 1 Q., 2.11172
Lot 2, Block 56 190.05 95.03
heeubd iv Ls Loa of part
of Blocks 48,56 & 75
of Ocean Beach Addition
#3 as per plat recorded
in Plat Book 21 at
Page 26 of the pub 1 is
Records of Dade County,
Florida,
Lots 1 through 5 1/2 frontage 80.1 6 2.11172 40. 1 t• 2.11172
Block C 168.94 84.47
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVM that the sums and amounts assessed against each
of the lots or parcels of ground described in said preliminary assessment
roll, after modifications as above set forth, and the sums and amounts against
each of the lots or parcels of ground therein set forth, after said modification
have been made, are less than the amounts each lot or parcel of ground is
benefited by said improvement and that the total assessments as indicated on
said assessment roll in the sum of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Nineteen Dollars
and Fifteen Cents ($2, 19.15) , are hereby approved and confirmed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ten days after this confirmation of said
assessment roll the same be delivered to the City Clerk, and the City Clerk
is hereby ordered, thirty days after the date of this resolution, to make
collection of the assessments therein as required by law, provided, however,
that the owner of any lot or parcel of land which shall have been assessed
in excess of $25.00 may, before the lapse of said thirty days , file with the
City Clerk his written undertaking, waiving all irregularities and illegality
in connection with said assessments against said lot or parcel and agree to
pay the same in equal instalments in each of the five succeeding years at
the time in said years at which the general City taxes are due and payable,
with interest upon said deferred instalments at the rate of six per cent per
annum from date of said confirmation, which said five year period is hereby
fixed and determined by the City Council.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, A. D. 1951.
% /a_4:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
e
-5-
-,--
H
H
CO a
co Q)
O 4 E
N. W
a)
o to F-1
Z a
¢ 0 v,
H H cd0 to
X'
0 0
I
o 4-i