Loading...
LTC 68-2003 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Office of the City Manager Letter to Commission No./,~' - ~;~ To: From: Subject: Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission Jorge M. Gonzalez ~ ~ City Manager POTENTIAL SUPERMARKET SITES IN NORTH BEACH Date: March 13, 2003 This LTC is to update you on the Administration's efforts to continue evaluating potential supermarket sites in North Beach. City staff prepared the attached package of information in addition to meeting with John Williams from Paradise Group, representing Publix Supermarkets. We also provided the attached package to and met with Agustin Herran, representing Sedano's Supermarkets. We encouraged both developers to analyze and consider the potential North Beach sites. We welcome your suggestions, comments, and guidance. J M G\CIVTC'%"Ji3G\JAM\KM H F:\PLAN\$ALL~leighborhood\LTC pot supermkt sites NOBE 02.03.doc C: Christina M. Cuervo, Assistant City Manager Kevin Crowder, Economic Development Division Director Joyce A. Meyers, Principal Planner Property' Information Map Page 1 of 1 Property Information Map This map was created on 1/27/2003 10:32:32 AM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami-Dude County. All rights reserved. My Home Miami-Dude County, Florida MI~MI'DAD~E ,, 200 fl Summar Details: :olio No.: )2-3210-013-0410 =ropert¥: 369 NORMANDY DR Malting 3 d A COMMERCIAL Address: :~EALTY INC 1150 NW 72 AVE SUITE 444 VllAMI FL 213126-1921 Property Information: Primary 3400 COMMERCIAL, Zone: ~vlEDIU M INTENSITY CLUC: 3011 RETAIL Beds/Baths: Floors: Livin~ Units: Adj Sq ~6,780 Foota~le: Lot Size: .~1,000 SQ FT Year Built: 1949 =B 25-60 OCEAN SIDE SEC SLE OF NORMANDY LOTS Legal 12 THRU 19 iNCL BLK 3 LO'[ Description: ;IZE 200,000 X 105 OR 15573-292 0692 2 {3t Sale Information: Sale O/R: 1~/5159793~ 0292 Sale Date: ale Amount: ~$1,525,000 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $336,000 $336,000 Building Value: $306,894 $306,894 Market Value: $642,894 $642,894 Assessed Value $642,894 $642,894 Total $0 $0 Exemptions: Taxable Value: $642,894 $642,894 http://gisims2~c~miami~dade.~us/myh~me/printmap~asp?mapur~=http://gisims2.c~.mian~... 01/27/2003 Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 ' Property Information Map 0 This map was created on 1/27/2003 10:33:19 AM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida 200 ft Summary Details: Folio No.: 2-3210-013-0280 Property: ~374 GARRY AVE Mailing ~* J A COMMERCIAL Address: ~EALTY INC 1150 NW 72 AVE SUITE 444 dlAMI FL 33126-1921 Property Information: 3900 MULTi-FAMILY, }rimary MEDIUM DENSITY ~-one: RESIDENTIAL .~LUC: 0065 PARKING LOT 3eds/Baths: 0/0 _ivin~l Units: 0 ~,dj Sq :oota~e: _ot Size: 18,750 SQ FT f'ear Built: 1941 2-3-10-11 53 42 OCEAN SIDE SEC OF ISLE OF .egal NORMANDY PB 25-60 LOTS 3escription: 1-2 & 3 BLK 3 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 125 OR 15573-292 0692 2 !3t Sale Information: ISale O/R: 15573-0292 Sale Date: 6/1992 Sale Amount: $1,525.000 Assessment Information: !Year: 2002 2001 .and Value: $255,938 $196,875 3uildin~l Value: $15,235 $15,235 ~arket Value: $271.173 $212,110 ~ssessed Value: $271,173 $212.110 rotal $0 $0 --xemptions: raxable Value: $271,173 $212,110 htt~:/~/gisims2~c~miami~dad~us/myh~me/printmap~asp?ma~ur~=htt~://gisims2.c~.miam... 01/27/2003 Z RUE VERSAILLES 0 ~ z z ' Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 Property Information Map 0 This map was created on 111312003 3:13:40 PM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI.DADI~ , 240 ft Summar Details: Folio No.: 32-3210-002;0820 Property: Mailing fEUNG PRQPERTY Address: dOLDINGS INC t104 AURQRA ST CORAL 3ABLES FL 33146-1416 Property Information: Primar7 1100 RESTRICTED Zone: .~OMMERCIAL CLUC: ;0065 PARKING LOT Beds/Baths: O/0 Floors: 0 Livin~l Units: 0 ~,dj Sq 0 Foota[le: Lot Size: 32.213 SQ FT Y'ear Built: 0 10 53 42 ISLE OF NORMANDY MIAMI ViEW _egal SEC PART 1 PB 34-80 LOT 3escriptJon: 35 t3LK 36 LOT SIZE 32213 SQUARE FEET OR 16887- 5643 0895 1 Sale Information: ISale O/R: 16887-5643 Sale Date: 6/1995 Sale Amount: $530,000 Assessment Information: fear: 2002 2001 _and Value: $434,876 $434,876 3uiidin~ Value: $2,400 $1,800 Vlarket Value: $437,276 $436,676 Assessed Value: $437,276 $436,676 total $0 $0 Exemptions: taxable Value: $437,276 $436,676 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade, fl.us/myhome/printmap.asp ?mapurl=http :// gisims2.co.miam... 01/13/'2003 Property Infomqation Map Page 1 of I Property Information Map 0 This map was created on 1/27/2003 10:43:14 AM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami-Dade County. All rights reserved. My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMI.DAD~ 118ff Summary Details: Folio No.: 32-3210-011-0370 Propert}c 1960 NORMANDY DR Mailing MAX RICHARDS &W HENIA \ddress: & VICTOR RICHARDS TR 13271 SW 57 CT MIAMI FL 33156-7229 Property Information: iPrimary 6100 RESTRICTED one: COMMERCIAL 3LUC: 0063 UTILITY 3eds/Baths: 0/0 Zloors: 2 _ivin~ Units: 0 ~,dj Sq 4,054 :oota[le; _or Size: 25,771 SQ FT fear Built: 1971 9-t0 53 42 PB 40-33 MIAMI ViEW SEC - ISLE OF _egal NORMANDY PART 3 LOTS 1 Description: FHRU 9 BLK 36 LOT SIZE 236440X 109 OR 15020- .~126 0491 4 Sale Information: ISale O/R: ~4 Sale Date: 11991 Sale Amount: ~$0 Assessment Information: Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $386,565 $297,655 Building Value: $150.117 $146,318 Market Value: $536,682 $443,973 Assessed Value $536,682 $443.973 Total $0 $0 Exemptions: Taxable Value: $536,682 $443,973 http://gisims2.c~miami~dade~us/myh~me/printmap~asp?mapur~=http ://gisims2~c~miam... O1/27/2003 0 VERD C MIRODRIGUEZ:I~ GRANVILLE CT Z Wednesday, December 13. 2000 Tom Mooney City Of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Dr. Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: Normandy Isle Walgreens Dear Tom: rom c0mmerd01 group rem development compony rom [eolt~ services Via Fax 305-673.-7559 We have no major problems with the City recommendations and look forward to presenting the final design to the Design Review Board. There is however a deed restriction put in place when Southland Corporation owned the property.' that could be construed as a restriction to Walgreens' USe. This is being worked out however it does not make sense to spend the money to prepare presentation pieces if in the end the restriction does not go ax~a,/. This being said Iarn requesting a deferral until the next meeting in Januan.'. 2001 so that when we in fact do in fact present the plans we will be assured the project is moving forward. Sincerely, Seth Gadinsky Managing Partner Cc: Bernard Zyscovich 5555 Anglels Ave. · Suite 21 · Ft. Laude daJe. Florida 33312 · 954/981-4116 · %4/981-3656 fax www. rgmreaJestate.com DEC-21~-2000 RAH COPlMERCIAL GROUP 954 981 411E, P._~lJ'01 Tuesday, December 26, 2000 .^,Tom Moo~ey Of ~iami Beach City 1700 Convention Center Dr. Miami Boa;h, FL 33139 Re: Dc': ign Review File No. 13645; 1995 71st Street Dear Tom I received Via Fax 305-673-7559 our December 19, 2000 letter. Our position is the satue as before. Until the title issue is resolved with Southlmad Corp. we de not want to waste the CiB,'s time and energy approving a landmark building Il,at may or may not get built. We are confident that it will work out to our satisfaction mad appreciate continuing the applicationlfor another month. mm rommer¢idl fftsup rem development c~mpany Sincerely, Seth Gadinsky Mmtaging Par'rarer Cc: Joy Rackley 5555 Angle/s Ave. · Suite 21, Ft. Lauclerdole, Florida 33312,954/981-4116 · 954/98%3656 fax www.ramrealestote rom '' TO*AL P.DI CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 February 26, 2001 Mr. Seth Gadinsky RAM Development Co., Inc. 5555 Anglers Avenue, Suite 21 Ft. lauderdale, FL 33312 RE: Design Review File No. 13645; 1995 71st Street Dear Mr. Gadinsky: Please be advised that at the February 22, 2001 meeting, the Design Review Board took no action on the above noted matter. Consequently, the matter would need to be renoticed prior to going back before the Design Review Board. Furthermore, please be advised that Section 118-257 of the Miami Beach Code specifies that in the event an applicant fails to present for approval to the Board a revised application inclusive of all required exhibits which address the concerns of the Board and/or staff within 120 days of the date the application was continued or at an earlier date as ordered by the Board, the application shall be deemed null and void. Accordingly, revised drawings for the subject application, which address the concerns of the Board and/or staff, must be considered by the Board no later than 120 days from the December 18, 2000 meeting. Consequently, the Design Review Board must consider revised drawings for the subject application, which address the concerns of the Board and/or staff, no later than its April 17, 2001 meeting, or the application shall be deemed null and void. The submission deadline for the April 17,2001 meeting is March 12, 2001. If you have any questions with regard to this matter or the resubmittal procedure, please contact me, THOMAS Design and Preservation Manager TRM:tm F:\PLANt $ DRB\DRBOI\FEBDRBO 1\ 13645.CLT C: B. Zyscovich DRB File No. 13645 Page '1 of 1 Me,/ers, Jolvce From: Mooney, Thomas To: Meyers, Joyce Cc: Subject: N. beach Site Attachments: Sent:Mon 1/27/2003 11:16 AM I spoke w/Seth Gadinsky; when Southland Corp (7-I 1) owned the site, they had a deed restriction placed on the property stating that NO convenience store other than 7-11 could go there. Apparently Walgreens was able to overcome that as it was deterrrfined that a drag store was NOT a convenience store; I never found out why Walgreens pulled out of the deal. The Brokers Rep for the site is John Lenardo (305-446-2586). I could not reconcile any times for next week; what is your schedule like the following week (2/10)'? http://webmai~.ci.miami-beach.~.us/exchange/J~yceMeyers/~nb~x`qq.%2~beach%2~Site .... 01/27/2003 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JORGE G. GOMEZ, DIRECTOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 18, 2000 MEETING DESIGN REVIEW FILE NO. 13645 1995 71st Street - Walgreens. The applicant, RAM Development Company, Inc., is requesting Design Review approval for the construction of a one (1) story retail structure with a mezzanine. HISTORY: The applicant came before the Board on September 19, 2000 and the matter was continued to a date certain of October 17, 2000, at the request of the applicant. On October 17, 2000 the project was continued to a date certain of December 18, 2000. SITE DATA: Zoning - Future Land Use Designation- Lot Size - Existing FAR- Proposed FAR - Existing Height - Proposed Height- Existing Use/Condition - Proposed Use - CD-1 (Commercial, Low Intensity) CD-1 (Commercial, Low Intensity) 32,267 S.F. N/A (Vacant Lot) 13,200 S.F. / .41 (Max FAR = 1.0), as represented by the applicant N/A (Vacant Lot) One (1) Story Vacant Lot Drug Store THE PROJECT: The applicant is proposing to construct a one-story drug store on a vacant lot located between 71 st Street and Normandy Drive. Vehicular access will be from the alley and Biarritz Drive; the structure is located on the south side of the site, with direct frontage on Biarritz Drive and 71st Street. Page 2 DRB File: 13645 Meetin~l Date: December 18, 2000 The structure is massed in a contemporary fashion, and conforms to the perimeter of the site. The main building is defined by a large corner entry feature, and incorporates a whimsical, undulating roof parapet. COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING CODE; The application, as proposed, appears to comply with all pertinent aspects of the City Code; however, the following is noted: Parking requirement for 13,500 sq. feet is 45 spaces; only 41 spaces are provided. The 11 spaces at the rear alley will require approval from Public Works department for back out into alley. The rear setback in CD-1 District is five (5) feet and none has been provided (alley may not be defined as a street). These and all zoning matters shah require final review and verification by the Zoning Administrator. ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE Additional information will be required for a complete accessibility review pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Accessibility Code (FAC). CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION: A preliminary evaluation of this application indicates that it will not degrade the adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Recreation. Accordingly staff has made a preliminary determination that the concurrency requirements for these portions of the Miami Beach Code have been met. With regard to the adopted LOS for Roads, a traffic impact analysis may be required to be submitted by the applicant to determine whether the project meets the concurrency requirements of the Code. A mitigation plan may be required prior to the issuance of any Building Permit for the project. COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: Design Review encompasses the examination of architectural drawings for consistency with the criteria stated below with regard to the aesthetics, appearances, safety, and function of the structure or proposed structures in relation to the site, adjacent structures and surrounding community. Staff recommends that the following criteria is found to be satisfied, not satisfied or not applicable, as hereto indicated: Page 3 DRB File: 13645 Meeting Date: December 18, 2000 o J The existing and proposed conditions of the lot, including but not necessarily limited to topography, vegetation, trees, drainage, and waterways. - Satisfied The location of all existing and proposed buildings, drives, parking spaces, walkways, means of ingress.and egress, drainage facilities, utility services, landscaping structures, signs, and lighting and screening devices. - Not Satisfied; see Condition//1 and Staff Analysis The primary south and west elevations have not been adequately developed. The dimensions of all buildings, structures, setbacks, parking spaces, floor area ratio, height, lot coverage and any other information that may be reasonably necessary to determine compliance with the requirements of the underlying zoning district, and any applicable overlays, for a particular application or project. - Satisfied The color, design, selection of landscape materials and architectural elements of Exterior Building surfaces and primary public interior areas for Developments requiring a Building Permit in areas of the City identified in section 118-252. - Not Satisfied; see Condition//1,//2 and Staff Analysis A fully developed landscape plan has not been submitted; the primary south and west elevations have not been adequately developed. The proposed site plan, and the location, appearance and design of new and existing Buildings and Structures are in conformity with the standards of this Ordinance and other applicable ordinances, architectural and design guidelines as adopted and amended periodically by the Design Review Board and Historic Preservation Boards, and all pertinent master plans. o Satisfied The proposed Structure, and/or additions or modifications to an existing structure, indicates a sensitivity to and is compatible with the environment and adjacent Structures, and enhances the appearance of the surrounding properties. - Satisfied The design and layout of the proposed site plan, as well as all new and existing buildings shall be reviewed so as to provide an efficient arrangement of land uses. Particular attention shall be given to safety, crime prevention and fire Page 4 DRB File: 13645 Meeting Date: December 18, 2000 10. 11. 12. 13. protection, relationship to the surrounding neighborhood, impact on contiguous and adjacent Buildings and lands, pedestrian sight lines and view corridors. - Satisfied Pedestrian and vehicular traffic movement within and adjacent to the site shall be reviewed to ensure that clearly defined, segregated pedestrian access to the site and all buildings is provided for and that all parking spaces are usable and are safely and conveniently arranged; pedestrian furniture and bike racks shall be considered. Access to the Site from adjacent roads shall be designed so as to interfere as little as possible with traffic flow on these roads and to permit vehicles a rapid and safe ingress and egress to the Site. - Satisfied Lighting shall be reviewed to ensure safe movement of persons and vehicles and reflection on public property for security purposes and to minimize glare and reflection on adjacent properties. Lighting shall be reviewed to assure that it enhances the appearance of structures at night. - Satisfied Landscape and paving materials shall be reviewed to ensure an adequate relationship with and enhancement of the overall Site Plan design. - Not Satisfied; see Condition #2 and Staff Analysis A fully developed landscape plan has not been submitted. Buffering materials shall be reviewed to ensure that headlights of vehicles, noise, and light from structures are adequately shielded from public view, adjacent properties and pedestrian areas. - Satisfied The Proposed structure has an orientation and massing which is sensitive to and compatible with the building site and surrounding area and which creates or maintains important view corridor(s). - Satisfied The building has, where feasible, space in that part of the ground floor fronting a street or streets which is to be occupied for residential or commercial uses; likewise, the upper floors of the pedestal portion of the proposed building fronting a street, or streets shall have residential or commercial spaces, shall have the appearance of being a residential or commercial space or shall have an architectural treatment which shall buffer the appearance of the parking Page 5 DRB File: 13645 Meeting Date: December 18, 2000 structure from the surrounding appearance of the project. - Satisfied area and is integrated with the overall 14. The building shall have an appropriate and fully integrated rooftop architectural treatment which substantially screens all mechanical equipment, stairs and elevator towers. - Satisfied 15. An addition on a building site shall be designed, sited and massed in a manner which is sensitive to and compatible with the existing improvement(s). - Satisfied 16. All portions of a project fronting a street or sidewalk shall incorporate an architecturally appropriate amount of transparency at the first level in order to achieve pedestrian compatibility and adequate visual interest. - Satisfied 17. The location, design, screening and buffering of all required service bays, delivery bays, trash and refuse receptacles, as well as trash rooms shall be arranged so as to have a minimal impact on adjacent properties. - Satisfied STAFF ANALYSIS: The subject site is extremely difficult to work with, due to its awkward configuration and by its location in between two (2) major thoroughfares. Staff has worked closely with the applicant and the architect to develop a siting and location plan which addresses the urban context of the immediate area, and which minimizes the impact of the vehicle. In this regard, the proposed location of the structure at the south side of the site maximizes its visibility from the east, where it will be most prominent. The north side of the site is not quite as visible from a distance, as Normandy Drive veers left when approaching the site. The applicant is to be commended for proposing a unique and cutting edge design concept which addresses the post-ward modern (MiMo) character of the immediate area. Further, the large, clearly defined corner entry allows for a much more pedestrian friendly development project, and provides an architectural focal point for the remainder of the structure. Indeed the exemplary site planning and architecture Page 6 DRB File: 13645 Meetincj Date: December 18, 2000 associated with this project is proof that a modern, vehicularly oriented use can sufficiently address the pedestrian and urban context of an as-built environment. In order to assure that the north side of the site is consistent with the sidewalk character of Normandy Drive, it is suggested that a decorative wall, which is consistent with the architectural vocabulary of the subject structure, be constructed along the northern perimeter of the site, fronting the entire entrance drive and parking area. It is further suggested that additiona~ fenestration, which is clear and transparent, be incorporated into the south and west elevations. Finally, additional architectural development of the north, south and west elevations, in the form of contrasting surface finishes, is suggested. Staff is confident that these issues and concerns can be addressed administratively, as indicated in the recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: In view of the foregoing analysis, staff recommends the application be approved, subject to the following conditions, which address the inconsistencies with the aforementioned Design Review criteria: Revised elevation, site plan and floor plan drawings shall be submitted to and approved by staff; at a minimum, such drawings shall incorporate the following: Additional fenestration, which is clear and transparent, shall be required on the south and west elevations, in a manner to be approved by staff. bo Additional arch!~ectural development of the north, south and west elevations, in th~ form of contrasting surface finishes, shall be required in a manner to be approved by staff. A revised landscape plan, prepared by a Professional Landscape Architect, registered in the State of Florida, and corresponding site plan, shall be submitted to and approved by staff. The species type, quantity, dimensions, spacing, location and overall height of all plant material shall be clearly delineated and subject to the review and approval of staff. At a minimum, such plan shall incorporate the following: All exterior walkways, driveways and parking spaces shall consist of decorative pavers, set in sand or other semi-pervious material, subject to the review and approval of staff. Page 7 DRB File: 13645 Meeting Date: December 18, 2000 o b. All landscape areas shall be defined by continuous concrete curb. A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain. A decorative wall, which is consistent with the architectural vocabulary of the subject structure, shall be required along the northern perimeter of the site, fronting the entire entrance drive and parking area; the dimensions, scale, massing and design of the wall shall be subject to the review and approval of staff. The proposed landscape plan shall be substantially enhanced and diversified, in a manner to be approved by staff. All building signage shall be consistent in type, composed of flush mounted, non-plastic individual letters and shall require a separate permit. The final exterior surface color scheme, including color samples, shall be subject to the review and approval of staff and shall require a separate permit. A traffic mitigation plan, which addresses all roadway Level of Service (LOS) deficiencies relative to the concurrency requirements of the City Code, if required, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the final building plans shall meet all other requirements of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new windows, doors and glass shall be required, prior to the issuance of a building permit. All roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices shall be clearly noted on a revised roof plan and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be approved by staff. All new and altered elements, spaces and areas shall meet the requirements of the Florida Accessibility Code (FAC). The project shall comply with any landscaping or other sidewalk/street improvement standards as may be prescribed by a relevant Urban Design ,Master Page 8 DRB File: 13645 Meeting Date: December 18, 2000 Plan approved prior to the completion of the project and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. JGG:TRM F:\PLAN\$DRB\DRBOO\DECDRB00\13645.DEC III 0 c f~ 0 f~ A:LLEY o 0 Illllillllllll i