Loading...
North Beach Town Center Central CoreNorth Beach Town Center Central Core UPDATE MIAMIBEACH North Beach Town Center Central Core oundaries North: 72nd St. East: Collins Av. South: 69th St. West: Indian Creek Dr. /Dickens Av. Legend Liming besIdnedvn Existing and Proposed Zoning MVE 235' RM 11 rr 71RD S 72ND•5T• GU If the community is increasing the FAR, then at the same time the boundaries of the zones: TC -1, TC -2, and TC -3 could be combined into one 'Town Center (TCY district The primary difference between these zones is a variation in FAR and height limits, yet almost all of the other rules are the same, irrespective of a property's TC designation. Given that some of the boundaries are very close together, simplifying the design parameters will save time for both applicants and the City. If the community still feels that there shou Id be some variation in height based on geographic location, then a separate regulating map can be created to identify height limits within the combined Town Center District. ■ ■ ■ ■ z 72ND ST TG=2 0 RM_3. 200' ■ 69T1-0S5 ■ ■ RMi 3 2ao' 01 1.4.0' 0 125 250 500 Feet 1 1 1 1 1 Goals o Encourage the redevelopment and revitalization of the North Beach Town Center. o Promote development of a compact, pedestrian- oriented town center consisting of a high- intensity employment center, mixed -use areas, and residential living environments with compatible office uses and neighborhood- oriented commercial services; o Permit uses that will be able to provide for economic development in light of changing economic realities due to technology and e- commerce; o Promote a diverse mix of residential, educational, commercial, and cultural and entertainment activities for workers, visitors and residents; o Encourage pedestrian- oriented development within walking distance of transit opportunities at densities and intensities that will help to support transit usage and town center businesses; o Encourage neighborhood- oriented retail and prevent an excessive concentration of large -scale retail that has the potential to significantly increase regional traffic congestion. o Provide opportunities for live /work lifestyles and increase the availability of affordable office and commercial space in the North Beach area. o Promote the health and well -being of residents by encouraging physical activity, waterfront access, alternative transportation, and greater social interaction; Use Regulations o Use Regulations o Regulations to incentivize sustainable economic development o The list of permitted, conditional, prohibited, and accessory uses has been re- structured into a unified table. o Viable Commerce o Two (2) 35k sq. ft. Neighborhood Fulfillment Centers are listed as a permitted use, which allow E- commerce retailers to sell goods online and allow them to be picked up at the center. o Allow Artisanal Retail. o Ground level residential units to be live -work units. o Use Predictability o Typical Planning Board conditions codified and include: o Hours of operation for entertainment; o Requirements for double door vestibules for entertainment; o Requirement for entertainment establishments to also be restaurants; o Loading and trash hours and standards; o Other noise reduction criteria. o Protect Low - Intensity Residential Areas: o Primary means of pedestrian ingress and egress for uses that may have an impact on low- intensity residential, such as entertainment establishments, commercial establishments over 25,000 square feet, retail establishments over 25,000 square feet, and artisanal retail uses, CANNOT be located within 200 feet of an RM -1 district. 70th Street Pedestrian ''r� '-- - - ��k%6tt th Paseo - Seattle, Washington Create Micro - units/ Co -Live Units 6. The [Sty Regulates the Size of Units to Reduce Construction and Housing Costs The concept of reducingthe minimum size of apartments has been around for a long time. Reducing the minimum size of units can make there more affordable to build and rent. Units in big cities have typically been smaller due to the need to create more housing on smaller parcels of land. Micro - units, which are small apartments typically around 200 to 300 square feet and include a small living/ bedroom area, bathroom, and kitchenette, emerged in the early 20005 as way to provide affordable housing for younger people in cities such as San Francisco and Seattle. Seattle has seen an increase in micro-units and allows apartments as srnall as 220 square feet.. The micro-unit trend has swept the country with many cities and developers exploring variations of the strategy. In West Palm Beach, a developer has submitted plans for a 12 -story downtown apartment building with 400 units of about 450 square feet or half the size of a typical one bedroom unit. Allow Micro - Units /Co- living units with a minimum of 375 sq. feet with a minimum floor area for amenities for residents r • PB Recommends: 1O% • Staff Recommends: 20% Mobility Study Recommendations: o Continue to implement projects in Transportation Master Plan o Reduce parking requirements and encourage centralized parking areas. o Require facilities to encourage biking such as bicycle parking. o Require facilities to encourage walking such as wider and more comfortable sidewalks. o Require transit oriented development (TOD). o Regulate uses due to increased FAR to minimize vehicle use. Findings: o Even if there is no new development in the Town Center, traffic is expected to continue to increase. o To great extent, this is due to cross traffic and greater development of cities to the north. o If the Town Center is developed as proposed, the impacts are reduced significantly since the area residents would not need to drive long distances for employment, goods, and services. ■ Land uses in the study area should be reviewed to determine what should be encouraged, allowed, or prohibited, to create an optimal mix of uses that both services local needs and retains local small businesses while attracting regional attractions. For instance, office uses would contribute to improving the local economy by adding additional patrcns for local businesses. An increase in both daytime and nighttime occupants that would come from an increase in office and residential units respectively would help to create what is known as a 24 -hour community, where there is a constant flow of people in the streets and patron izing businesses throughout the day_ 7U Shoot: Exislina Condi +ions T \\\\'\\t �i I !1. 5Ir t: Slop 2 ,iiad 3 "No Street Left Behind" o Overlay will include zoning regulations that will ensure that the newly approved FAR is appropriately distributed within development sites in order to activate ALL street frontages. o Regulations will prevent massing on a single frontage which creates a "back -of- house" condition on opposite street frontages. o Regulations ensure appropriate pedestrian facilities that encourage walking through requiring active uses, wider sidewalks, larger shade trees, shade structures. o Street Tree and Canopy Requirements: o All street trees shall require the installation of an advanced structural soil cells system (Silva Cells or approved equal). o Minimum amenity requirements have been proposed, including irrigation, up lighting and porous aggregate tree place finish, for all tree pits. o Class A & B streets require larger caliper of trees to provide canopy. 1 What NOT to Do Retail Space Not Visible Retail Space Not Deep from Street Enough to Be Viable Require habitable space to be Require minimum depths of located at the setback line habitable space 1 Need for Wider Sidewalks Requires a "Clear Pedestrian Path" of 10 feet on ALL frontages • Can incorporate public sidewalk and setback areas • Free from all obstructions, including trees and sidewalk cafes Roadway Classes & Minimum Habitable Space • Currently for buildings with parking levels, only the first floor is required to have usable, habitable space along the street frontage_ If that requirement exten ded to all floors, such as in the land development regulations for Miami and for the Downtown Kendall District in Miami-Dade County; the character of the streets and safety for pedestrians in Miami Beach would be better than with the existing rule_ Class A (Red) : 50' depth Class B (Pink): 45' depth Class C (Orange) : 20' depth Class D (Yellow): 20' depth Setbacks o Increased setbacks at the first level allow for expanded pedestrian movement and for outdoor cafes that do not interfere with pedestrian flow. o Requires a minimum 10' clear pedestrian path o Requires appropriate transition to 69th street o 25' tower setback from 71st street to maintain scale o 10' setback requirement to create a mid -block passage (Paseo) Building Height and Width o Current: o TC -1: 125 feet o TC -2: 50 feet o TC -3: 45 feet. o Proposed: o PB Recommendation o 125' - 220' with Public Benefits o Staff Recommendation o 125' - 200' with Public Benefits o Tower Width (Portion above 55'): o 165' within 50' of the property line o Tower Separation: 60' within a single site Public Benefits Require Public Benefits for North Beach to exceed 125' in height o Pay a Fee per Square Foot per Economic Study o City Commission to allocate generated funds for use in North Beach o Providing On -Site Workforce or Affordable Housing o Providing Off -Site Workforce or Affordable Housing in the City o Achieving LEED Platinum Certification o Provide a fully Sustainable Structure and Surplus Stormwater Retention and Reuse o Provide active recreation facilities open to the general public o Obtain a full building permit within a certain time -frame of the effective date of the ordinance o PB Recommends 3 years from the effective date o Staff Recommends 15 months from the effective date What NOT to Do Wall effect r1upuseu iiitiilUt ons on tower width of 165 l l lul portions of flowers within 50 feet of property line to prevent wall effect Wall Effect and Height Towel 14.1111. - II •6611 :125' (wall effect, not desirable) Tower Width: 140' - Height : 220' miry Towel V 9Y 14.4 1 Y Y . ._ . 200' (Proposed) Tower Width: 124' - Height : 250' (out of scale) Wall Effect and Height MEW 4 ower Mdt.h Height APP Tower Width.. 165. - Tower Width;_ 140 ,x.11 H = R eight • 2 O Maximum FAR Distribution Without P^ ' '- P v n+ With Public Benefits (White) Up to 125 FT -11 stories (Gray) 125 -145 FT -13 stories (Orange) 145 -175 FT --16 stories (Turquoise) 175 -200 FT -19 stories fl The Collins 15 stories /140 feet Height Comparison St. Tropez 27 stories /245 feet Burleigh House r. 18 stories /165 feet Port Royale 14 stories /130 feet Carillon 39 stories /350 feet 401 Blu 17 stories /165 feet Indian Creek Club 10 stories /83 feet +• w� sa fi ♦ Massing Study Conclusion On June 26, 2018, the Planning Board recommended: • Building Height - Recommended that the maximum height be increased to 220 feet from the proposed 200 feet. • Planning staff recommends 200' • Co- Living - Reduce the minimum percentage of floor area to be dedicated to amenity space from the proposed 20% to 100. • Planning staff recommends 200 • Public Benefits - Remain as proposed in the attached ordinance, and provide an additional option that exempts a project from the public benefit requirements if a full building permit is obtained within three (3) years of the effective date of the ordinance. • Planning staff recommends 15 months with provisions for tolling in the event of appeal or continuances. Shulman+ Associates 03 Septem her 2014 PROPOSED OPTION 3 (COLLINS AVENUE CHANGES) FAR HEIGHT FRONT SET- 3.D PEDESTAL 75' PEDESTAL 5' TOWER 135' TOWER 5' 72ND STREET PROPOSED OPTIONS PROPOSED OPTION 3 FAR HEIGHT FRONT SETBACKS 3.5 PEDESTAL 45' PEDESTAL 15' TOWER 150 TOWER 10' LI PROPOSED OPTION 3 FAR HEIGHT FRONT SETBACKS 3.5 PEDESTAL 55" PEDESTAL 5' TOWEFI 135' TOWER 30" .... • . .1.••• •••••••• ••e. .... •• .... : PROPOSED OPTION 3 FAR HEIGHT FRONT SETBACKS 3.5 PEDESTAL 55' PEDESTAL 5' TOWER 135` TOWER 30'