2003-25213 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-25213
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOLLOWING
A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR PUBLIC
COMMENT ON SAME, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST-WEST
ALLEY IN BLOCK 12, OF BISCAYNE POINT ISLAND,
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, IN FAVOR OF DANIEL B. HABER
AND WIFE KIMBERLY, OWNERS OF THE ADJACENT
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1355 CLEVELAND ROAD;
WAIVING BY 517THS VOTE, THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING
AND APPRAISAL REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 92-2783, FINDING SUCH WAIVER TO BE
IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY; FURTHER
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS TO EFFECTUATE
THE TRANSACTION, INCLUDING A QUITCLAIM DEED,
SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW OF SAME BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
WHEREAS, Daniel B. Haber and wife Kimberly (Owners/Applicants), own the
property located at 1355 Cleveland Road, Miami Beach, legally described as Lot A and B
and the east I foot of Lot C of the re-subdivision of Lot 16, Block 12, of Biscayne Point
Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 29, Page 63 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade
County, Florida (the Property); and
WHEREAS, there is a public east-west platted alley in Block 12 to the north of Lots
A and B as described above (the Alley); and
WHEREAS, the Owners/Applicants are requesting the vacation of the portion of the
alley adjacent to the Property, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, Owner/Applicant has complied with the application requirements for
vacation of City rights-of-ways, and, pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-2783, governing the sale
and/or lease of public property, the Mayor and City Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing to hear public comment on this request for vacation, on May 21, 2003; and
WHEREAS, a Planning Department study has also been prepared with respect to the
subject vacation, as required by Ordinance No. 92-2783; further, the Administration would
recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk waive by 5/7ths vote, the appraisal and
competitive bidding requirements, as permitted by Ordinance No. 92-2783.
Page 1 of2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that following a duly
noticed public hearing to hear public comment on same, approve and authorize the vacation
of a portion of the east-west alley in Block 12, of Biscayne Point Island, Miami Beach,
Florida, in favor of Daniel B. Haber and wife Kimberly, owners of the adjacent property
located at 1355 Cleveland Road, while maintaining a five (5') feet wide utility easement
adjacent to the vacated alley centerline; waiving by 5/7ths vote, the competitive bidding and
appraisal requirements pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-2783, finding such waiver to be in the
best interest of the City; further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute any and all
documents to effectuate the transaction, including a quitclaim deed, subject to final review of
same by the City Attorney's office.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st
,2003
ATTEST:
w~} p~
CITY CLERK
F:\WORK\$ALLIVGK\COMMEMOIMA Y21 03\BiscPtVacResos.doc
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
Il~cJ)
Date '
Page 2 of2
.~.
.:::ir;;.~
_.
..;.
~
"-
J
~
~
~
C(l
i
6
i
.
U
II
I"
J I
I! ..
1I
I;
"
!i
-!.
II
~I
BOUNDARY
SURVEY
AREA OF ALLEY'
,
,
,
.
,
~ ;!: :EM
~ ~ 1
~ ~:
I- Co'
q O"f:
- z:
b
.
~ :
'0
a
- I
~ . i,
UJ ::;j~ I' 0
'.....1 ,0
Pi :~
: I i
:1 I~
FND.IP.li2" ;I ~~.
(NO 10) w 'lJ".
;20.80'
~ :
- ,
-
18.00'
ONE STORY CBS :
RESIDENCE # 1~
Tile
,
roaO'
CL
,
I!
1~ '"
-
~
',.. ""
I~ <n
."
-
18 I- .
g
I-
I
I
I
~
~
'"
....
~
25.40'
~
~
~ 2' Planter
M
"
:i
'1-
~: g
;~ w-)
-IN
il
,(
"
'it
I ! LOT"A"
I \ ~,.
I
LOT "B"
61.00'(R&M)
I lioWM
! -------~ .WP'- ....--......------
I a:: ,
\ "1ii~:;-, 10' Parkway
; 15.....10
'-:-- --- i~(~"- - - -.- -.---- ;;. Aspha~-----
, I
.--.L-4:----eXEVELAND ROAO--------:t----. ._-
,
18
;..0
...,......-------
I
;
.I
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
~
Condensed Title:
A Resolution approving and authorizing the vacation of portions of the east-west alley in Block 12 of
Biscayne Point Island, to the adjacent property owners at: 1315,1355 Cleveland Road, 8000, 8040 Cecil
Street and 1320 N. Biscayne Point Rd.
Issue:
Shall the remaining portions of the east-west alley in Block 12 of Biscayne Point Island be
vacated/abandoned to the adjacent property owners?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
Biscayne Point Island has an east-west platted alley in Block 12, portions of which the City had vacated to
the adjacent property owners in 1983 and 1991, while maintaining a 10 foot wide utility easement in the
center. Owners of the properties adjacent to the remaining portions of this alley have recently submitted an
application requesting the City to vacate/quit-claim that portion of alley adjacent to their property. The
owners of these properties have complied with the application requirements, but have submitted a
combined $5,000 application fee and are requesting the Commission to waive by 5/7ths vote, pursuant to
Ordinance NO.92-2783, the competitive bidding and appraisal requirements. A Resolution scheduling a
public hearing was adopted on April 30, 2003 and property owners within a radius of 375 feet from Block 12
were notified.
The Administration recommends approval of the Resolution while maintaining a 10 foot easement in the
center of the vacated alley and the requirement for owners to comply with all planning and zoning rules and
regulations for any improvements/construction within this vacated alley.
Adviso Board Recommendation:
The Land Use and Development Committee considered the issue of a fee waiver for this easement and
determined not to waive the application fee. The Committee did support the administration suggestion that
in this situation a rou a Iication and fee was a ro riate.
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
D 2
3
4
Finance Dept. Total
Cit Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin
Gary Kokorian, Public Works
Si n-Qffs:
Department Director
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
R7C
5-;?J-o 3
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
WWN.ci.miami-beach. fl.us
To:
From:
Subject:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Date May 21,2003
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez ~ ~.'/ .,.r.' _ .& .~""'. ,...;
City Manager ~ '- "( . .
FIVE (5) RESOLUTIONS OF THE MAYO~ D CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOLLOWING A DULY NOTICED
PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT ON SAME,
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF
THE EAST -WEST ALLEY IN BLOCK 12, LOCATED ON BISCAYNE POINT
ISLAND, MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, BETWEEN N. BISCAYNE POINT
ROAD AND CECIL STREET, TO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNERS AS INDIVIDUALLY LISTED IN THE ATTACHED
RESOLUTIONS: 1315 CLEVELAND ROAD, 1355 CLEVELAND ROAD,
8000 CECIL STREET, 8040 CECIL STREET AND 1320 N. BISCAYNE
POINT ROAD; WAIVING BY 5/7THS VOTE, THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING
AND APPRAISAL REQUIREMENTS, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-
2783, FINDING SUCH WAIVER TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE
CITY; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS TO EFFECTUATE THE
TRANSACTION, INCLUDING A QUITCLAIM DEED, SUBJECT TO FINAL
REVIEW OF SAME BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
BACKGROUND
Biscayne Point Island has an east-west platted alley in Block 12 as shown in the attached
Exhibit "An. In 1983 the City adopted Resolution 83-17368 vacating portion ofthis 20 feet
alley to the adjacent property owner of Lots 14 and 15, while maintaining a 10' utility
easement in the center of the alley. In 1991, the City vacated the 10' portion of this alley
adjacent to Lots 1, 30 ft of Lot 2 and 10 to 13.
In 2002, the following property owners/applicants requested vacation of the remaining
portions of the alley to the centerline, adjacent to their properties:
1. Frank Avila, 8000 Cecil Street
2. Ethel Stratton 8040 Cecil Street
3. Ana C. Fuentes 1315 Cleveland Road
4, Mr. and Mrs. Daniel B. Haber 1355 Cleveland Road
5, Lilian Janini 1320 North Biscayne Point Road
At the time of the initial request, the property owners requested a waiver of the application
fee. The request was considered by the Land Use and Development Committee on July 3,
2002, and the report submitted to the Commission on July 31,2002. Following a discussion
of the report, the Commission determined that the application fee should stay in place with
the ability of individual applicants to make their case before the entire Commission for a fee
waiver,
In April 2003, the owners of the five properties mentioned above filed an application with
the City requesting the vacation/abandonment of the 10 foot portion to the centerline of the
alley adjacent to their properties. The City, pursuant to City Code, Chapter 82, Article II,
Section 82-37, prior to the vacation of this alley, on the April 30, 2003 commission meeting
scheduled a public hearing to be held on May 21, 2003 to consider this request.
ANALYSIS
The owners of the properties listed above have complied with the application requirements
by submitting a combined $5,000 application fee and provided a list of property owners
within a radius of 375 feet from Block 12 who were notified of this scheduled public
hearing, in addition to notices in the media.
The City Administration following reviews by Public Works Department and an analysis by
the Planning Department (see attached copy), is recommending the vacation of this 20 feet
alley, on condition of maintaining a 5 feet utility easement on either side ofthe centerline of
the alley for a total of 10 feet.
A question was raised whether a tot-lot could be installed in the typical vacated 10ft. by 60
ft, area; according to standards published by the National Recreation and Parks
Association's National Playground Safety Institute, a 10' x 60' can not be safely used for a
tot-lot. However, the total combined width of the vacated alley and the existing setback
portion of the property may be sufficient for a tot-lot, provided that the City's zoning
requirements are met.
Because, by the definitions of Ordinance No. 92-2783, the vacation of this alley is
considered a conveyance transaction of city property, the Ordinance requires that an
advertised public bidding process and an independent appraisal of the fair market value be
done prior to abandoning such property, However a 5/7ths vote of the City Commission
can waive these requirements of the Ordinance. The applicants/property owners are
requesting the City Commission to waive the competitive bidding and appraisal
requirements for this vacation. The Administration considers this vacation of portions of
this alley to be in the best interest of the City and recommends the waiver of the appraisal
and public bidding.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends the City Commission approve and authorize five (5)
resolutions, following a duly noticed public hearing to hear public comments on same, the
vacation of a portion of the east-west alley in Block 12 of Biscayne Point Island, between
N. Biscayne Point Road and Cecil Street, to each ofthe following adjacent property owners
as individually listed in the attached resolutions: 1315 Cleveland Road, 1355 Cleveland
Road, 8000 Cecil Street, 8040 Cecil Street and 1320 N. Biscayne Point Road, Additionally
waiving by a 5/7ths vote, the competitive bidding and appraisal requirements, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 92-2783; and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute any and all
documents to effectuate the transaction, including a Quitclaim Deed, subject to final review
of same by the City Attorney's Office.
Attachment
JMG/RCM/FHB/RH/AVNGK
T:\AGEN DA \2003\may2103\regular\Biscayne Point VacatingofAlley.doc
~Z~ ~
Cl
W
..
, '
tP
247
t'
.....
.",
t
. ,OS"
-
. ..
~
....a
OZ
Nj
~W
.
. ~-
~Ul-
i-O!
-..10
!1Ia.
:Z:c=J1II
><ZZ
111->-
~C
Ou
:z:w
fI)-
II
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
. . Planning
, .\..'
InteroffrC1!! Memorandum
~
From:
liJ I:i~i 14 ffi I: 54
Cristina M.~G.l;I_~PIO . 1,-' : c~, ....r;I liEiJ f
Assistant City Manager
Jorge G. Gomez, AICP .lttt--
Planning Director ~
To:
Date: May 14, 2003
Subject: PLANNING ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SHAPIRO ORDINACE
In accordance with Section 82-38 of the City of Miami Beach code, the Planning Department shall
prepare an analysis for the City Commission and the public that outlines all conditions relating to the
proposed sale and/or lease of city property, The following analysis applies to the vacation of an alley
abutting the rear following properties:
1. 8000 Cecil Street
2. 8040 Cecil Street
3. 1315 Cleveland Road
4. 1355 Cleveland Road
5. 1320 North Biscayne Point Road
1. Whether or not the proposed use is in keeping with city goals and objectives and
conforms to the city comprehensive plan.
The proposed alley vacation conforms to the city's goals and objectives and the Comprehensive
Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that Right-of-Way protection as an objective of the
Traffic Circulation Element; however, the subject alley is a non-essential element of the
transportation system of the City of Miami Beach. Prior resolutions have been granted by the
City Commission authorizing the vacation or portions of the alley to adjacent property owners,
This vacation request completes the transfer of the alley to the remaining adjacent property
owners.
2. The impact on adjacent property, including the potential positive or negative impacts
such as diminution of open space, increased traffic, noise level or enhanced property
values, improved development patterns and provision of necessary services. Based on
the proposed use of the property, the city shall determine the potential impact of the
project on city utilities and other infrastructure needs and the magnitude of costs
associated with needed infrastructure improvements. Should it become apparent that
further evaluation of traffic impact is needed, the proponent shall be responsible for
obtaining a traffic impact analysis from a reputable traffic engineer.
The proposed vacation is not expected to have any detrimental impact on the adjacent
properties. The subject alley is not an active vehicular right-of-way and as such, will not increase
the traffic or noise level. The alley is not part of the city's Open Space system and as such, will
not compromise the goals of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive
plan. The proposed vacation includes a provision to provide a 5' - 0" utility easement in order to
accommodate city utilities and other infrastructure needs.
3. A determination as to whether or not the proposed use is in keeping with a public
purpose and community needs, such as expanding the city's revenue base, reducing city
costs, creating jobs, creating a significant revenue stream, and improving the
community's overall quality of life.
By vacating the alley, the city dissolves all liabilities associated with maintaining the alley,
thereby reducing overall costs. Additionally, by converting the subject alley to taxable property,
the city can generate a revenue stream from the subject alley.
4. Determination as to whether or not the development is in keeping with the surrounding
neighborhood, will block views or create other environmental intrusions, and evaluation
of the design and aesthetic considerations of the project.
In 1983, (Resolution 83-17368) and 1991 (Resolution 91-20250), the City Commission granted
the vacation of other portions of the alley to adjacent property owners. Since the alley has
previously been vacated, the vacation of additional portions of the alley is in keeping with the
surrounding neighborhood. The vacation is not expected to block views or create environmental
intrusions,
5. The impact on adjacent properties, whether or not there is adequate parking, street and
infrastructure needs.
The vacation shall not increase the parking requirement in the vicinity of the alley, The provision
to create a 5' - 0" utility easement is included to protect the city's current and/or future
infrastructure needs,
6. A determination as to whether or not alternatives are available for the proposed
disposition, including assembly of adjacent properties, and whether the project could be
accomplished under a private ownership assembiy.
No alternatives have been proposed.
7. Within the constraints of public objectives, the department should examine financial
issues such as job generation, providing housing opportunities, and the return to the city
for its disposition of property.
By vacating the alley, the city dissolves all liabilities associated with maintaining the alley,
thereby reducing overall costs. Additionally, by converting the subject alley to taxable property,
the city can generate a revenue stream from the subject property.
8. Such other issues as the planning, design and historic preservation division may deem
appropriate in analysis of the proposed disposition.
None.
JG~~D
c:
L:IPLANI$ALLIShapiro amend fileslBiscayne Point Alley Vacation - Block 12.doc
, (-~
-0 z~ ,,-,
247
Q.
~t
~
,0;>
i;;
....a
OZ
N:5
....(1)
= ~-
CUt-
;"O!
-..10
lamA.
-
.... Z:c:JW
><ZZ
111->
~cC
Ou
%U)
(1)-
I:D
"I:l
f
Gl
:z:
!
c
eN
eN
-
~' d
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
II011CE IS HEREBY given that public hearings will be held by the City
Commission of the CIty of Miami Beach, in the Commission Chambers, 3rd floor,
CIty Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Aorlda,on wednesdly,.
..., 21.2003 at 10:40 a.m. To Consider Public Comment. As Required By
Ordinance No, 92-2783, Regarding: .
1. The vacation Of Portions Of The East-West Alley In Block 12, Located On
Biscayne Point Island, Miami Beach, Flor1da, Between N. Blscayne Point Road
And Cecil Street, To Each Of The Following Adjacent Property Owners At
1315 Cleveland Road. .
2, The Vacation Of Portions Of The East-West Alley In Block 12, Located On
Biscayne Point Island, Miami Beach, AOrlda, Between N. Biscayne Point Road
And Cecil Street, To Each Of The Foilowing Adjacent Properly Owners At
1355 Cleveland Road.
3. The vacation Of Portions Of The East-West Alley In Block 12, Located On
Blscayne Point Island,Mlami Beach, Florida, Between N. Biscayne Point Road
And Cecil street, To Each Of The Following Adjacent Properly Owners At
8000 Cecil street,
4. The Vacation Of Porttons Of the East-West Alley In Block 12, Located On
Biscayne Point Island, Mi~1 Beach, Florida, Between N. Blscayne Point
Road And Cecil Street, To Each Of The Following Adjacent Property Owners At
8040 Cecil S1reel
5. The Vacation Of Portions Of The East-West Alley In Block 12, Located On
Blscayne Point Island, Miami Beach, Florida, Between N. BIscayne Point Road
And Cecil Street, To Each Of The Following Adjacent Property Owners At
1320 N. Biscayne Point Road.
INQUIRIES may be directed to the Public Works Division at (305) 673-7080.
ALL INTERESTED PARl1ES are Invited to appear at lhishearlng, be
represented by an agent, or to express their views in writing addressed to the
City Commission, ria the City Clerk, 1700 Convention Center DrIve, 1 st Roar,
City Hall, Miami Beach. Florida 33139. This meeting may be continued and
under such circumstances additional legal notice would not be provided.
Robert E. Parcher, City Clerk
City of Miami Beach
__ " SecIlon 286.0105. AI. SlIt. \I1t CIty hnby _ ... public thoI: " . ~ docldoo ID IPllOII ony
_.....bVIhICIly~"""_"ony__lIi1l1_..iII---
_ .....1hII. _1Im......."'llle _lImod1.___thO_nt-
IClOO _h lhIlPI>IIIlI" bI_.1l1iO _ dolo naI_"'" bV IhI CIty tar thO -..
__ar___..__...._.___aroppeolonol--
_ bVlIw.
...--""" IhIMl1ric:al)1- _""'" 1990,......._-' ~..,-"pri:lpoIo
..1his~....._lnIDnn_..._""......witl1__.. ..~1hispullliclliar1 in
IOOISSiblefarmll....._IlF_-.....,-_thO CIlyDll1<" a/lICell (305)673-7.". no
_ 1hIn..... dIyI ..... .. thO _. " _lmpIired. _ thO CIly QlI1<.. -... thO florida Allay
_ ....-; (800) 955-8771. (T1Y) co (800) 955-&770 (VOICE).
Adlrl72
,.:
>-
c
:2
~
Cl
fS
z
Cl
w
.
E
o
u
,;
"i
Co
Gl
i
L
I
This Instrument Prepared By
Rau] J. Aguila
First Assistant City Attomey
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive
Miami Beach, Florida 33]39
QUIT -CLAIM DEED
17
THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, made this ~ I day of /11/f'1 ,2003, by first party, CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is 1700 Convention Center Drive,
Miami Beach, Florida 33139, to DANIEL B. HABER AND KIMBERLY M. HABER, his wife
(collectively, second party), whose address is 1355 Cleveland Road, Miami Beach, Florida 33141.
WITNESSETH, that the first party, for good consideration and for the sum of TEN
DOLLARS AND NOII00 ($10.00) paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, and pursuant to the authorization granted in, and subject to the conditions of, City of
Miami Beach Resolution Number 2003-25213, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" hereto,
does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the said second party forever, all right, title interest
and claim which the said first party has in and to the following described parcel of land and
improvements and appurtenances thereto in the County of Miami-Dade, State of Florida to wit:
The South 10.00 feet of a 20 foot alley, shown on Biscayne Point, Plat Book 14, Page
35, Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. Said portion of the 20 foot alley
bounded on the West by the Southerly Right-of-Way Line of North Biscayne Point
Road, and bounded on the East by the Northerly Extension ofthe East Line of Lot A,
Block 12, entitled Plat of Subdivision Lot 16, Block 12 ofBiscayne Point, Plat Book
29, Page 63, Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida, as specifically
delineated in the sketch in Exhibit "B", attached and incorporated hereto.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances
thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim
whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit,
and behoof of said party of the second part.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day
and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence.
/1- (aiL (.1--' f~ ),t( (2"'L~ 'f/
Witness J ., A ,') 'l c,' J
P . t N ,...' 'flc lii- (". ~.-f,i-k'I--l'L'(~ ~
nn ame . ,
ACH, a Florida
ATTES~ r~
JotLERK
By:
N e: i
Title: Mayor
1700 Conventien,Center Drive
Miami Beach, FloriX~~~~ED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
. . fOR EXECUTION
'''''"~i2t,.. - .
~ "''' ,".,..".:..
. ? ~{,r' {.('." (~' '{/. ' ;
Ity AttornJi/f'~"" Hat
,\) "
,.
Lffi/1<:~"'w uJd.,~
Witness
Print Name H.t3Li:-ElJl" /A.fl' Hi A /A.J
STATE OF FLORIDA
)
)
)
SS
COUNTY OF DADE
regoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ tJ M day of
-l ,2003, by David Dermer, as Mayor ofthe CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida
muni pal corporation, and who being first duly sworn by me, deposes and says that he executed the
foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expresses. He is personally known to me (~r has
produced , as identification.
EXPIRES: May 3, 2007
Bonded Thru NalIJy Nllic llndenwt11ers
My Commission Expires:
Commission No.:
RJA led
F:lallolAGURIQuit Claim Deed-Daniel Haber (Biscayne Point).doc
rrl
X
I
CD
--I
CP
OtIJ-lZ
rrlOIO
tlJCrrl~
o -l O'
:::OI_
- -l
CD::t>-<
rrl
OZO
0'1
"D
:::o::t>~
00_
"DL...::t>
rrl::t>~
:::00-
rrl
-lZCD
-<---jrrl
::t>
'1-l0
OOI
:;0
C-l:;o
-lIrrl
-rrl-l
'= ::t>
-lZ-
-<OZ
:::otIJ
rrl-l-l
::t>II
tIJ
rlCDrl
~0(Jl
rlC
ZZ'1
-lOrl
::t>rl
:::o-l
-<-l
OI
'1::t>
-l
-l,
I-
rlrl
tIJ
...
...
...
...
101
f"T1:::r: II ~ I
G) Pi
~~-iR7I~1
' 0 0
rrl 0 I
->. f"T1)> AJ I
- n 0
U>n )>
no 0
:::03:: I
-0-0 I
-i)> I
oz
-<
o
rl
tIJ
o
:;0
CD
rrl
o
~CD-l
'rlCD:::O::t>__I
~O::t>Oc)~::t>~rl
- ---jtIJCIrl~::t>tIJ
"D->---jZ---j-<I-<o
cm,O I OZc
-rlOCD rn
CD- Zo.,O::t>"'---j
'=CDrrl I CO"DI
0, O~Zrlo->
OOz 0 -0
:::00., ::t>rlOZ,
rrl^ -l-<00-l0
o 'I C- 0
O->Orl'=OZ"D
:;oN-l ZZ---j,'1
rlrl -<",-rl
Oo::t>::t> '.vrl
tIJ '1 - tIJ O.~ '1 ---j -l
OCDCD-l'1rl,CDO
'1-'CDZ 00'1
tlJO ~:;oO
~OO-<OrlO^::t>
-::t>^ :::OtIJ
::t>-< -l-l-l?>->N
~Z->II -P-o
IrlNrl CDtIJ-
o - Z~-<~"D'1
::t>"DrrlOtIJ-lO::t>o
oQZ:::OOI GJO
rrlZ:::::!-l::t>rl"Drl-l
-l---jI-< 0
O' 'rrlZtIJ:;00J::t>
0"D8:;Orrlo::::!SJ1~
C, , Co rl
Z::t>"D-<25-lZ"D-<
---j-l'rrl_I C'
--< )> x Z rl 0 CD tIJ
CD---j--,---j:::O'1'I
0-', _
~ooS2:::O-<-lO~
O^'1t1JO I:;oZ
:::0 -::t> rlrrl
ONtlJOO 0
)>;.DCZ- ~Oo
. CD::t> :::0 Z
"Dg~z '10
)>< 0 OtIJ
GJUj-l 00
rl-I -l
Orrl '1
Z
air-
-<I'TI
(;')
~~
l'TIo
01'Tl
-(I)
~~
0-0
"":::1
~o
_Z
>0
~.."
aI-o
l'TIo
>Al
0:::1
::J:o
AlZ
l'TIo
(I).."
o
E~
:::t1'Tl
o
Z>
r-
zr-
01'Tl
.-<
NaI
01'Tl
0-
~Z
1(;')
~~
NO
-->
~rr1
o
t\
I \
i;ol~~\
I~ Il' rrll~
Lln__j -(,
-~--~
::t>
:;0
rl
::t>
o
\
\
\
CD
o
^
)>
----"
N
,
o
---j
CD
U>
n
)>
-<
Z
f"T1
CD
z
o
::::0
~
)>
z
o
-<
U)
n
)>
--<
Z
fTl
-0
o
Z
-i