Loading...
RESOLUTION 84-17792 RESOLUTION NO. 84- 17792 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AN AMEND- MENT TO AND EXTENSION OF A PROMISSORY NOTE IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $3, 000, 000 DATED MAY 6, 1974, AS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 74-14312 WHICH WAS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 74-14328, WHICH WAS LATER AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 74-14348 ; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE REMAINING BALANCE OF SAID PROMISSORY NOTE; AMENDING THE RATE OF INTEREST PAID ON SAID PROMISSORY NOTE; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE FOREGOING; AUTHORIZING OTHER RELATED ACTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of_ Miami Beach, Florida (the "City" ) prior to 1974 instituted condemnation proceedings in the United States District Court, in and for the Southern District of Florida, against certain land involved in said proceedings, entitled City of Miami Beach vs. Charles P. Landt, etc. , et al. , being Case No. 73-926-Civ-JLK; and WHEREAS, the jury impane l l ed to try the issue , found and returned a verdict of Five Million Two Hundred Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($5, 216, 000) ; and WHEREAS , judgment was duly entered for said amount against the City, and the owners of said parcel of land were entitled to a further judgment representing attorneys ' fees and other court costs and charges; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney, Special Counsel John Farrell, Mr . S. Z. Bennett, the City' s Real Estate Consultant , and the City Manager , at that time recommended that said verdict and judgment be accepted as final and that no appeal was taken therefrom; and WHEREAS , it was determined that the best interests of the City required the acceptance of said recommendation; and WHEREAS , the City had set aside funds for the purpose of acquiring the subject property, but the funds so provided were insufficient to satisfy and discharge said judgment , and it was necessary, in order to satisfy and discharge said judgment, and the lien created thereby, to borrow funds for said purpose , and WHEREAS, the Miami Beach First National. Bank (now Flagship National Bank of Miami) made the offer most advantageous to the City to make such loan, secured by a lien upon the land which was the subject matter of said condemnation suit; and WHEREAS, the Miami Beach First National Bank agreed that the interest rate on said loan would be reduced in the event that the City agreed that a mortgage on an additional parcel of land known as Tract "B" , Indian Beach Corporation Subdivision, was given as further security for said loan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City deemed it to be in the best interest of the City to obtain such loan from said Miami. Beach First National Bank in the sum of Three Million Dollars ($3, 000, 000) for a term of ten years , at a rate of interest of 5- 1/4 percent per annum, said loan to be made on the basis of a 20- year amortization factor , with the annual payments during the term of said loan of approximately Two Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Dollars ($243, 000) with the tenth annual payment being One Million Eight Hundred Eighty-Four Thousand Dollars ($1, 884, 000) , said loan and mortgage to be payable in whole or in part at any time before maturity without penalty, and adopted Resolution No. 74-14312, on March 20, 1974, authorizing execution of a certain promissory note (the "Note") and mortgage secured by a first mortgage lien on the property acquired in the aforesaid condemnation proceedings and a second mortgage lien upon Tract "B" , Indian Beach Corporation Subdivision (which aforementioned first and second mortgage liens are hereinafter referred to as the "Mortgage" ) ; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 1974, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 74-14328 providing that as and for further security the City covenanted and agreed to pledge its revenues from other than ad valorem taxes and to set up and appropriate in its annual budget and appropriation resolution for expenditure in each year of the period during which said obligation would be outstanding and unpaid, amounts from such non-ad valorem tax revenues sufficient to make the payments called for by said Note as the same became due and payable and further covenanted and -2- agreed that its Finance Director would be authorized and directed annually to segregate sufficient funds from the City's said non- ad valorem tax revenues and to pay from such segregated funds all payments called for by the Note as the same became due and payable; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City on April 17, 1974 adopted Resolution No. 74-14348 amending Resolution No. 74-14328 in order to amend the payment provisions of the Note ; and WHEREAS, the remaining balance of $1, 883, 410. 41 became due and payable on June 6, 1984; and WHEREAS, Flagship National Bank of Miami , the present holder of the Note, has agreed to an amendment and extension of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note , and the City has determined that it is in the best interests of the City and its inhabitants and taxpayers that the Note be amended and extended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The amendment and extension of the Note, for a term of five (5) years and at an interest rate equal to seventy per cent (70%) of the prime rate, from time to time, of Sun Bank of Miami is hereby authorized , and the Mayor , or in his absence , the Vice-Mayor , is authorized and directed to/an ame Y ndment agreement evidencing such amendment and extension. SECTION 2. The Mayor and all officials and officers of the City are hereby directed to take any and all action and execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the purpose of this resolution. SECTION 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1l th day of July, 1984. '-';// q L.- 4'1'A ,,,„7 :1_____ Mayor Attest: /1.1.14.ra.)• 9-4- Lleffe D City Clerk LEGPLDLPT. ,42--- . 7 -i) ' atV..„L _44.44,,. - -3- OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 64N • • wcae4 F L O R I D A *kISCORP TED* P.O. BIN 190000 LUCIA ALLEN DOUGHERTY ''��3 ;10 MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33119 CITY ATTORNEY .. TELEPHONE: 673-7470 July 30 , 1984 Flagship National Bank of Miami 777 Brickell Avenue Miami , Florida 33131 Re: City of Miami Beach, Florida, Modification and Extension of Note and Mortgage in the Current Outstanding Principal Balance of $1,883 ,410 . 41 Ladies and Gentlemen: I , Lucia Allen Dougherty, am the City Attorney for the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the "City" ) . This opinion is given in connection with the modification and extension of a promissory note dated May 6 , 1974 , in the original principal amount of $3 ,000 ,000 . 00 (the "Note" ) , said Note being secured by a mortgage of even date therewith, said mortgage encumbering property set forth in Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof , and being recorded in the Official Records Book 8668 , at Page 2034 , of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida (the "Mortgage" ) . As counsel for the City, I have examined a Modification and Extension of Note and Mortgage, a Certificate as to the availability and use of non-ad valorem tax revenues of the City, a No Lien Affidavit and such other certificates, documents and materials as I deemed necessary for the purposes of rendering this opinion. As counsel for the City, I am of the opinion that: 1. The Modification and Extension of Note and Mortgage has been duly executed and delivered, and constitutes the valid, legal and binding obligation of the City. 2. There is no litigation of any kind now pending, or , to the knowledge of the City, threatened, to restrain or enjoin the issuance and delivery of the Modification and Extension of Note and Mortgage , or contesting the powers of the City to execute, deliver or perform its obligations under the Modification and Extension of Note Flagship National Bank of Miami July 30 , 1984 Page Two and Mortgage or in any manner questioning the authority under which the Modification and Extension Agreement of Note and Mortgage has been or will be executed , delivered and performed, or affecting the validity thereof. 3 . Neither the existence of the City as a political subdivision of the State of Florida, nor the title to his or her office of any member of the City Commission of the City is being contested. 4 . Neither the proceedings nor authorizations taken or given for the authorization of the Modification and Extension of Note and Mortgage have been repealed or revoked. 5. There are no agreements with third parties prohibiting or affecting the Modification and Extension of the Note and Mortgage , except to the extent of the pledge of and lien against certain excise taxes which are pledged to the payment of $7 ,550 , 000 Excise Tax Bonds , Series 1969 , which pledge and lien are superior to the pledge contained in the Note. It is to be understood that the rights of the holders of the Note and the enforceability thereof may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moritorium or other similar laws affecting creditors' rights heretofore or hereafter enacted and that their enforcement may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity. Very truly yours , Lucia Allen Dougherty City Attorney /r sn B y: ' �F,44- ra , Christopher G. Korge Assistant City Attorney AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) :SS COUNTY OF DADE ) On this 31'k day of 7 , 1984 personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, MALCOLM H. FROMBERG, Mayor of the City of Miami Beach, who, first being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That the City of Miami Beach is the owner of the following described property situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida, to-wit: SEE SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. 2 . That there are no mechanics' or other liens against the premises, and that there are no claims for labor , services or materials furnished for improving the premises that remain unpaid to date, and that no work has been done nor materials furnished, bills for which remain unpaid. 3 . That, other than that certain mortgage in favor of FLAGSHIP NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI (formerly Miami Beach First National Bank) , the property is free from any and all encumbrances whatsoever including, but not limited to, the lien of any mortgage, judgment, writ or intangible property tax lien made or suffered by the City of Miami Beach or others. 4. That there are no violations of zoning ordinances affecting the above described property; that the City of Miami Beach is in possession of the property. 5. That Affiant makes this Affidavit well knowing that it is being relied upon and that any false statement contained in it would subject him to all penalties imposed by law. 6 . That this Affidavit is made as an inducement for Flagship National Bank of Miami to extend its mortgage loan to the City of Miami Beach. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. __, /7 - , , - / Ite--x /‘ /-------- , (SEAL) MALCOLM H. FROMBERG; Mayor of the City of Miami Beach Subscribed and sworn o before me this 3/ day of , 1984. 1•- / � - - 4 .e`.1� Notary Publ i.c, S to e of Florida at Large radt TJB CS tIti li ila1 (NOTARY SEAL) / -� - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5En 21 19 IR 1$ONPED TSU kENERAL INSURANCE UN!) 1,3"-a-/W1 -171 3 Generally described as Lots 1 - 12 , inc. Block 3, 2nd Ocean Front Subdivision, Plat Book 28, page e 28, Public Records of Dade County, Fla. together with a parcel of sovereignty land in Indian Creek abutting Lots 2 through 7 , and a portion tion of Lot 8, Block 3 of said subdivision (Known as Brittany Bay property) Public park purposes Purchased from Charles P. Landt, as Managing Trustee of Cameron-Brown Investment Group, a Massachusetts business trust 6/15/73 $ 5, 216, 600.00 Recording Information City of Miami Beach v. Charles P. Landt , as Managing Trustee of Cameron-Brown Invest- ment Group, a Massachusetts Business Trust, et al, Case No. 73-926,Civ JLK, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division: "FINAL JUDGMENT DETERMINING COMPENSATION FOR TAKING OF PROPERTY" (not recorded in Public Records of Dade County, Florida) Acquisitionpursuant ursuant to "ORDER OF TAKING" entered June 15, 1973, by United States District Judge J.L. King. Resolutions No. . 74-14312; amended by Res. 74-14328 and Res. No. 74-14348, accepting verdict. Tax Exemption request Resolution No. 75-14597 -4- } • ORIGINAL RESOLUTION NO. 84-17792 (Authorizing an amendment to and extension of a promissory note in the original prin- cipal amount of $3,000,000 dated May 6, 1974, as authorized pursuant to Res. # 74-143:L2 which was amended by Res. No. 74-14328, which was later amended by Res. #74-14348; providing for the payment of the remaining balance of said promissory note; amending the rate of interest paid on said promissory note; authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment agreement with respect to the foregoing; authorizing other related action and providing an effective date.)