Ordinance 2019-4306 Mobility Fees - Land Development-Regulations
ORDINANCE NO. 2019-4306
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SUBPART B OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING CHAPTER 118, ENTITLED
"ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED
"DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES," AT SECTION 118-253, ENTITLED
"APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW," AND CHAPTER 118, ENTITLED
"ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE X, ENTITLED
"HISTORIC PRESERVATION," DIVISION 3, ENTITLED "ISSUANCE OF
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/CERTIFICATE TO DIG/CERTIFICATE
OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION," AT SECTION 118-562,
ENTITLED "APPLICATION," TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC
STUDIES CONSISTENT WITH REVISED CONCURRENCY STANDARDS;
AMENDING CHAPTER 122, ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT,"
TO BE RENAMED AS "CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY
FEES"; DELETING, AMENDING, AND RESTATING PROVISIONS IN
SECTIONS 122-1 THROUGH 122-10; CREATING ARTICLE I, ENTITLED
"PURPOSE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS," SECTION 122-1, ENTITLED
"PURPOSE," TO STATE THE PURPOSE FOR CONCURRENCY AND
MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-2, ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS," TO
ESTABLISH DEFINITIONS RELATED TO CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
AND MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-3, ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY
MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEE REQUIRED," TO ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCURRENCY REVIEW AND CALCULATION AND
PAYMENT OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-4, ENTITLED
"CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEE REVIEW," TO
ESTABLISH DEPARTMENTAL AND AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY FOR
REVIEW OF SPECIFIC CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEE
REQUIREMENTS; SECTION 122-5, ENTITLED "EXEMPTIONS FROM
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEES," TO PROVIDE
EXEMPTIONS FROM CONCURRENCY REVIEW AND MOBILITY FEE
PAYMENT TO INCENTIVIZE DEVELOPMENT UNDER CERTAIN SPECIFIED
CONDITIONS; SECTION 122-6, ENTITLED "APPLICATION FOR
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION REVIEW AND MOBILITY FEES," TO
ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING CONCURRENCY
MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEES; AND SECTION 122-7, ENTITLED
"ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES," TO ESTABLISH ENFORCEMENT
PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES; ESTABLISHING ARTICLE II, ENTITLED
"CONCURRENCY," SECTION 122-11, ENTITLED "LEVEL OF SERVICE
STANDARDS," TO ESTABLISH LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR
INFRASTRUCTURE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND
SECTION 122-12, ENTITLED "DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY," TO
ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE CALCULATION OF CONCURRENCY
REQUIREMENTS AND CAPACITY CREDITS; ESTABLISHING ARTICLE III,
ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEES," SECTION 122-21, ENTITLED "LEGISLATIVE
INTENT," TO PROVIDE THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR, AND INTENT
OF, THE MOBILITY FEE PROGRAM; SECTION 122-22, "ADOPTION OF
Page 1 of 32
MOBILITY FEE STUDY," TO INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH MOBILITY FEE TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, DATED AUGUST
2018; SECTION 122-23, "IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF MOBILITY
FEES," TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IMPOSITION AND
COLLECTION OF MOBILITY FEE; SECTION 122-24, "CALCULATION OF
MOBILITY FEES," TO ESTABLISH MOBILITY FEES AND THE
METHODOLOGY FOR THE CALCULATION OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION
122-25, "ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FEE STUDY,"TO CREATE
A PROCEDURE FOR THE REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT
MOBILITY FEE STUDIES TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT AND MOBILITY FEES
FOR LAND USES NOT DEFINED IN THE CODE; SECTION 122-26, ENTITLED
"MOBILITY FEE LAND USES," TO ESTABLISH SCHEDULE OF LAND USES
FOR THE CALCULATION OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-27, ENTITLED
"MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT DISTRICT," TO DESIGNATE THE ENTIRE CITY AS
A MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT DISTRICT; SECTION 122-28, ENTITLED
"MOBILITY FEE FUND ESTABLISHED," TO ESTABLISH A MOBILITY FEE
FUND; SECTION 122-29, ENTITLED "USE OF MOBILITY FEE FUND," TO
SPECIFY PERMITTED USES OF MOBILITY FEE PROCEEDS; AND
AMENDING "APPENDIX A — FEE SCHEDULE," TO PROVIDE FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEE REVIEW;
AND PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY,
CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida
Statutes, the City of Miami Beach (the"City") has the home rule authority to adopt a transportation
impact assessment program; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida
Statutes, the City also has the authority to adopt ordinances relating to the budgeting and
expenditure of City funds; and
WHEREAS, the City has broad home rule powers to adopt ordinances to provide for and
operate transportation systems, including roadways, transit facilities, and bicycle/pedestrian
facilities within the City; and
WHEREAS, in 1999, the City Commission adopted the City's 1999 Municipal Mobility
Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2000, the City Commission adopted Resolution 2000-23874
which adopted concurrency mitigation fees (and associated administrative fees) to fund projects
in the 1999 Municipal Mobility Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, entitled "Concurrency," authorizes local
governments to repeal transportation concurrency and encourages them to adopt an alternative
mobility funding system, including a mobility fee program; and
WHEREAS, the City worked with consultants to prepare a Mobility Fee Technical Analysis
pursuant to Policy 1.5 of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Mobility Fee Technical Analysis was prepared in August 2018 by Keith &
Schnars and NUE Urban Concepts, and provides the rationale for the proposed fees; and
Page 2 of 32
WHEREAS, the proposed mobility fee-based funding system complies with the dual
rational nexus test applicable to impact fees; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, requires the Comprehensive Plan to
contain a capital improvements element which shall, among other things, provide for standards
to ensure the availability and adequacy of public facilities, as well as projected revenues to fund
the facilities; and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2016, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2016-
29371, adopting the 2016 Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the revenue from the mobility fee created herein will be used to implement
projects set forth in the 2016 Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan, which serves as the basis
for the fee; and
WHEREAS,the amendments set forth below are necessary to accomplish all of the above
objectives.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA THAT:
SECTION 1. Chapter 118, entitled "Administration and Review Procedures," Article VI, entitled
"Design Review Procedures," at Section 118-253, entitled "Application for design review," is
amended as follows:
CHAPTER 118
ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES
* *
ARTICLE VI. - DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES
* * *
Sec. 118-253. -Application for design review.
* * *
(d) All applications involving demolition, new building construction, alteration, rehabilitation,
renovation, restoration or any other physical modification of any building, structure,
improvement, landscape feature, public interior or site in accordance with section 118-252
of the Miami Beach Code shall be on a form provided by the planning department and
shall include such information and attached exhibits as the board and the planning
department determine are needed to allow for complete evaluation of the proposed
demolition, construction and other physical improvements, alterations or modifications
including, but not limited to, the following:
* * *
Page3of32
(9) " - 'e-e - -. . . - ' - - - - - -- -- -- e ee - - -- -
as delineated under subsection a., below. Commercial and mixed-use developments
over 5,000 gross square feet and multi-family projects with more than four (4) units
or 15,000 gross square feet shall submit a transportation analysis and mitigation
plan, prepared by a professional traffic engineer, licensed and registered in the
State of Florida. The analysis and plan shall at a minimum provide the following:
A. Details on the impact of projected traffic on the adjacent corridors,
intersections, and areas to be determined by the City.
B. Strategies to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent
transportation network, to the maximum extent feasible, in a manner consistent
with the adopted Transportation Master Plan and adopted mode share goals.
C. Whenever possible, driveways shall be minimized and use common access points to
reduce potential turn movements and conflict points with pedestrians.
D. Applicable treatments may include, without limitation, transportation demand
management strategies included in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan.
A traffic circulation analysis and plan, prepared by a professional traffic engineer,
traffic on the immediate neighborhood and how this impact is to be mitigated, shall be
required in the following instances:
amended from time to time, all new development projects exceeding 5,000 gros.,
square feet.
19, For development projects that propose new floor area or an increase in floor aread
amended from time to time.
plan to:
1. Single family homes; and
2. Multi family projects (exclusive of mixed use projects) with less than five units or
15,000 gross square feet.
SECTION 2. Chapter 118, entitled "Administration and Review Procedures," Article X, entitled
"Historic Preservation," Division 3, entitled "Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness/Certificate
to Dig/Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition," at Section 118-562, entitled "Application," is
amended as follows:
ARTICLE X. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION
* *
Page 4 of 32
DIVISION 3. - ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS / CERTIFICATE TO
DIG / CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION
Sec. 118-562. -Application.
* * *
(b) All applications involving demolition, new building construction, alteration, rehabilitation,
renovation, restoration or any other physical modification of any building, structure,
improvement, landscape feature, public interior or site individually designated in accordance
with sections 118-591, 118-592 and 118-593, or located within an historic district shall be on
a form provided by the planning department and shall include such information and attached
exhibits as the board and the planning department determine are needed to allow for complete
evaluation of the proposed demolition, construction and other physical improvements,
alterations or modifications including, but not limited to, the following:
* * *
mitigate traffic generated by the development, and shall encourage the use of alternative
modes of transportation, in accordance with the following: Commercial and mixed-use
developments over 5,000 gross square feet and multi-family projects with more
than four (4) units or 15,000 gross square feet shall submit a transportation
analysis and mitigation plan, prepared by a professional traffic engineer, licensed
and registered in the State of Florida. The analysis and plan shall at a minimum
provide the following:
A. Details on the impact of projected traffic on the adjacent corridors,
intersections, and areas to be determined by the City.
B. Strategies to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent
transportation network, to the maximum extent feasible, in a manner consistent
with the adopted Transportation Master Plan and adopted mode share goals.
C. Whenever possible, driveways shall be minimized and use common access points to
reduce potential turn movements and conflict points with pedestrians.
D. Applicable treatments may include, without limitation, transportation demand
management strategies included in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan.
A traffic circulation analysis and plan, prepared by a professional traffic engineer, licensed
following instances•
amended from time to time, all new development projects exceeding 5,000 gross
square feet.
Page 5 of 32
amended from time to time.
c. The following shall be excluded from performing a transportation study and mitigation
plan to:
1. Single family homes; and
2. Multi family projects (exclusive of mixed use projects) with less than five units or
15,000 gross square feet.
SECTION 3. Chapter 122, entitled "Concurrency Management," is amended as follows:
CHAPTER 122
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES
Sec. 122 1. - Purpose.
of service which are established in the capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan
of the city and the city's municipal mobility plan.
Sec. 122-2. - Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
Aggrieved person means an applicant, a person who resides or owns property within 375 feet of
management system. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other
good shared by all persons.
Available capacity means public facility capacity lees capacity used by existing development, final
reservations of capacity made in connection with the payment of applicable fees and issuance of
issuance of approved development orders.
concurrency requirements for future development.
Concurrency management system manual means the technical administrative manual, adopted
methodology for determinations of concurrency.
Page 6 of 32
of a proposed development based on the following units of measurement:
(2) Residential developments:The number of residents, and/or number of dwelling units;
visitors;
visitors;
{5) Hotels and motels:The number of rooms and employees; and
{6) Service stations:The number of gasoline dispensing pumps and size of mini mart.
from the provisions of this chapter, granting, denying or granting with conditions an application for
zoning approval, division of lots, rezoning, conditional use, variance, certificate of use,
the development of land which exceeds the intensity of development which exists on the property
at the time of application.
development at a particular location at an adopted level of service.
building, additional floor area, an increase in the number of dwelling units contained in an existing
which a new certificate of use and occupancy will be required.
needed public improvements will be timely constructed or that the adverse impacts of a diminution
in level of service are substantially mitigated.
Preliminary concurrency determination means a determination by the concurrency management
Public facilities means the facilities for which the city has adopted levels of service, including
roads, transit, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, flood protection, stormwater
management and parks and.recreational facilities.
TAZ means one or more geographic areas or zones within a TCMA defined by land use and other
geographic variables for the purpose of analyzing the impact of a proposed development on the
city's transportation system.
Page 7of32
TCMA means a specific geographic area—designated in the city's comprehensive plan in
wide level of service (LOS) standard is applied.
•
public facilities for a parcel of land.
Sec. 122-4. - Concurrency required.
Unless exempt under the provisions of section 122 5 hereof:
{1) No development order shall be granted unless the applicant for development approval
is the holder of a valid preliminary concurrency determination;
concurrency reservation certificate; and
{3) No final concurrency reservation certificate shall be granted unless the applicant is the
with this Code.
Sec. 122-5. - Exemptions from concurrency.
The following types of development are not required to obtain a preliminary concurrency
city's ability to provide essential services and facilities related to health and safety
(2) An application requesting modification(s) of a previously approved development order
prescribed levels of service imposed by the requested modification(s)will be no greater
previously existing use.
(3) An application for the renovation of an historic structure, provided that the use of the
historic structure is not intensified.
(') An application to develop a parcel of land for single family purposes if no change in the
zoning map is required to accommodate the development.
Page 8 of 32
(6) An application for the construction of, an addition to or renovation of a guest house,
garage apartment or other similar accessory units on parcels zoned to permit such uses.
2000, pursuant to F.S. ch. 380.
(8) A valid, unexpired final development order approved prior to the adoption of this
chapter.
(9) Temporary uses in public rights of way, as determined by the city commission by
Sec. 122-6. - Level of service standards.
(a) A determination of concurrency shall be based on the levels of service established in the
capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan of the city, at the time the proposed
shall be conducted in accordance with the methodology described in the city's concurrency
management system manual and shall be based on the capacity of available public facilities
- --- --- " ----• _ -e. ..• - - -- --- --- - -l• A - - ' •
waste and storm water management facilities shall be deemed available if they are:
(1) In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency;
generate a demand for services; or
8(d), which will ensure that the facilities will be provided at the time the proposed
development is projected to generate a demand for services.
be deemed available if they are:
(1) In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency;
_ __ _ •••-_ _ _ _ -__ _ to be available by the appl eablc city, statc-er
other governmental agency at the time the proposed development is projected to
generate a demand for services; or
(3) The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the city.or
Page 9 of 32
year after the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services.
deemed available if they are:
generate a demand for services; or
(3) The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the city or
8(d), which will ensure that the facilities will be provided at the time the proposed
development is projected to generate a demand for services;
('). Programmed or otherwise committed to be provided as soon as reasonably possible
years after the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services;
and
- - • -- e _ e-ee_ _
Transportation Improvement Program, the Florida Department of Transportation's Five
Year Work Program, or the First Year Priority of the Miami Dade County Long Range
Plan.
{a) An applicant for development approval may apply for a preliminary concurrency
- -:_ __ _ _ - _ •-'-ary concurrency determination shall include such information
as required by the city's concurrency management manual and the following:
(1) Name of applicant;
(2) Location, size, legal description, folio number and existing use of the parcel proposed r
for development;
{3) A description of the use, density and intensity of use of existing and proposed
development, with adequate supporting information and studies;
- - - - - •e
proposed development;
{5) Development schedule and public facilities demand schedule;
{6) Description of any proposed on site or off site infrastructure improvements;
(7) The date of demolition permit; if applicable; and
Page 10 of 32
•
•
(8) A fee sufficient to reimburse the city for the cost of review of the application for a
preliminary concurrency determination.
notify the applicant in writing that the application is incomplete and shall identify the additional
until the required additional information has been received and the application is determined
to be complete.
•
approval. Receipt of a preliminary concurrency determination does not constitute a
reservation of capacity.
(a) Within 30 days after a determination of completeness, the concurrency management
division shall make a determination in accordance with section 122 6 as to whether required
public facilities are or will be available when needed to serve the proposed development and
•
proposed development according to the development schedule in the application for
preliminary concurrency determination.
(b) Capacity credits, in accordance with the methodology established in the city's concurrency
management system manual, shall be given for:
{1) Properties that have received a demolition permit one year or less prior to the adoption
date of issuance of the demolition credit; and
{2) Properties with existing improvements that are proposed to be renovated or
demolished.
(c) Within five days after a determination of concurrency, the concurrency management division
shall notify the applicant of the determination.
(d) In the event the determination is made that the required public facilities will not be available
- - -- - -- - - --- • - - -- - . _
an applicant for a preliminary concurrency determination ay-prepose a mitigatien-pregfam
in order to avoid a negative determination of concurrency. The proposed mitigation program
required public facilities improvements, adequate methods for securing performance of the
mitigation program, payment of mitigation monies and a proposed recapture program for the
approved by the concurrency management division, other appropriate departments of the city
and other agencies having-jurisdiction. The applicant shall enter into a mitigation agreement,
committing to the mitigation program, with the concurrency management division, which is
hereby authorized to enter into such an agreement on behalf of the city, subject to the
Page 11 of 32
30 percent mitigation credit to individual projects with approved historic designation
undergoing major rehabilitation. No credit will be granted to projects that have already been
have been determined to have a minor impact to the existing roadway LOS.
concurrency management division for an additional six months provided that an application
for development approval is being diligently pursued through the city's development review
process and provided that an extension is requested within the original one year period. In
the event the issuance of a preliminary concurrency determination is based on an approved
mitigation program, such certificate shall be expressly conditioned upon compliance with
such program.
issuance of the final development order for which the preliminary concurrency determination
is based, and upon payment of applicable mitigation fees as provided for in this Code, a final
reservation certificate shall be issued and the available capacity for the respective TCMA and
TAZ for the applicable public facilities will be reduced by the projected demand for the project
until the reservation of the capacity expires or becomes permanent. Upon issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the project, the reservation of the capacity of the applicable public
facilities becomes permanent.
(g) A final concurrency reservation certificate will expire within one year of issuance unless a
period.
(h) If the concurrency management division determines that the required public facilities are not
and will not be available to serve the proposed development and that an acceptable mitigation
program has not been provided, the concurrency management division shall issue a notice
of negative determination of concurrency and identify service areas experiencing deficiency,
and the improvements nccc nary to allow the issuance of a preliminary concurrency
development order shall be conducted until an appeal is resolved in favor of the applicant or
determination of concurrency is made.
Sec. 122 9. Concurrency appeal committee.
preliminary concurrency determinations and negative determinations of concurrency.
Page 12 of 32
(b) There shall be five members of the concurrency appeal committee: the director of planning,
parking committee.
under the provisions of sootio., 1 22.1 n
information showing compliance with level of service standards.
{a) An aggrieved person may appeal a preliminary or negative determination of concurrency to
the concurrency appeal committee by filing a notice of appeal with the committee within ten
days of the determination of concurrency.
(b) A notice of appeal shall be accompanied by:
appealed from is not supported by substantial competent evidence or departs from the
o'cential requirements of law; and
{2) Any supporting documentation.
which dismissal decision is subject to appeal as provided below.
(c) The appeal shall be considered and decided within 15 days of the filing of a notice of appeal.
previously considered by the concurrency management division.
(d) The concurrency appeal committee shall publish notice of its meeting at least seven days
prior to the public meeting on the appeal in a local newspaper of general circulation.
app al, grant the app al subject to conditions or deny the appeal. The committee shall grant
the appeal if the concurrency appeal committee determines that the determination by
concurrency appeal committee's determination. •. .
other aggrieved person to the circuit court appellate division by petition for writ of certiorari.
Page 13 of 32
•
ARTICLE I. - PURPOSE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 122-1. - Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that all development which increases the demand for
public facilities in the city will be served by adequate public facilities in accordance with the
levels of service which are established in the capital improvements element of the
comprehensive plan of the city and the city's municipal mobility plan.
Sec. 122-2. - Definitions.
The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
AI �
qqr ptr-
♦ t or r.hilit, f rcor-orp Th II r,_c. r+ +
concurrency agornsn-r.,�;..:�o -.-��::�w�::.,� c -.-�y:.�.-::. .-.-. -: -- —u :
be shared in common with othcr members of the community at large, but shall cxcccd in dcgrco
thcgc -==
Applicable Review Department means the department or agency that is charged with
reviewing a particular level of service for the purposes of concurrency review and mitigation
calculation or the calculation and collection of mobility fees.
Available capacity means public facility capacity less capacity used by existing development,
final reservations of capacity made in connection with the payment of applicable fees, and
issuance of certificates of occupancy and short-term reservations of capacity made in connection
with the issuance of approved development orders.
Capacity credit means a credit for certain existing or demolished improvements toward
concurrency requirements for future development.
Densities and intensities of development means a numerical measurement of the size and
scope of a proposed development based on the following units of measurement:
Nonresidential developments: The number of square feet of gross floor area or seats,
as applicable;
gi Residential developments:The number of dwelling units, or the number of square feet
of floor area, as applicable.,
Hospitals and clinics: The number of beds, and/or the number of square feet of gross
floor area, as applicable;
(4) Educational facilities: The number of students, or floor area, as applicable
Hotels and motels: The number of rooms; and
(6) Service stations: The number of gasoline dispensing pumps and size of mini-mart.
Page 14 of 32
Development order means any order, unless otherwise exempt from the provisions of this
chapter, granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for zoning approval,
building permit, division of land/lot split, rezoning, conditional use, design review, certificate of
appropriateness, variance, sidewalk café permit, certificate of use, business tax receipt, other
design approval, or any other official action having the effect of permitting the development of
land which exceeds the density and/or intensity of development which exists on the subject
property at the time of application.
Estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fee means an estimate of required
concurrency mitigation or payment of mobility fees that is required prior to the approval of a
development order.
Mitigation program means an undertaking to provide, or cause to be provided, required
public improvements, which undertaking is legally enforceable by the city and which ensures
that needed public improvements will be timely constructed or that the adverse impacts of a
diminution in level of service are substantially mitigated.
Mobility fee means an impact fee on new development and increases in density and/or
intensity, based on the calculation of predicted vehicles miles traveled (VMT).
Multimodal transportation means surface transportation system that includes all motorized
and non-motorized manners of travel.
Origin and Destination Adjustment Factor means a factor of 0.5. Trip generation rates
represent trip-ends at the site of a land use. Thus, a single-origin trip from a residence to a
workplace counts as one trip-end for the residence and one trip-end for the workplace, for a
total of two trip-ends. To avoid double-counting of trips, the PMT for each land use shall be
multiplied by 0.5. This distributes the impact of travel equally between the origin and destination
of the trip, and eliminates double charging for trips.
Person Miles of Travel (PMT) means the number of miles traveled by each person on a
trip.
Person Miles of Travel rate means the unit cost per additional person-mile of travel used
in developing the mobility fee schedule.
Person Trips means a calculation of vehicle trips, as multiplied by an average vehicle
occupancy.
Public facilities mean the facilities for which the city has adopted levels of service, including
potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste,flood protection, stormwater management, and parks
and recreational facilities.
Trip generation means the maximum number of daily trips generated for an applicable land
use type.
Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) means the movement of one privately operated vehicle for
one mile, regardless of the number of people in the vehicle.
Page 15 of 32
Sec. 122-3. - Concurrency mitigation and mobility fee required.
Concurrency mitigation and mobility fees, if applicable, are required for all projects that increase
the density and/or intensity of a site, including a building and/or use on a site. Unless exempt
under the provisions of section 122-5 hereof:
(a) No development order iaefrftirt shall be granted unless the applicant has obtained a valid
estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees;
• No development order shall be issued unless the applicant has proof of payment for all
applicable concurrency mitigation and mobility fees.
Sec. 122-4. - Concurrency mitigation and mobility fee review.
Concurrency mitigation review and mobility fee calculations shall be provided upon filing a
request with the Applicable Review Department. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions
of this chapter shall not be construed to restrict Applicable Review Departments other than
departments of the City of Miami Beach from establishing alternative review procedures.
Applicable Review Departments for developments in the City shall include the following:
Lai Potable water - Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Public Works Department, as
applicable.
21) Sanitary sewer — Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Public Works Department, as
applicable.
Lci Solid waste — Miami Beach Public Works Department.
(d) Storm water— Miami Beach Public Works Department.
Recreation and open space — Miami Beach Planning Department.
• Mobility fees— Miami Beach Planning Department.
• Public schools — Miami Dade County Public Schools.
Sec. 122-5. - Exemptions from concurrency mitigation and mobility fees.
The following types of development are not required to undergo concurrency review or pay a
mobility fee pursuant to this chapter:
(a) Any development undertaken by the city that does not require a rezoning, does not
increase in intensity, does not include an associated change of use, or that increases the
city's ability to provide essential services and facilities related to health and safety concerns
(fire, police, etc.).
(b) Any application that does not propose to increase intensity and/or density of a site.
Page 16 of 32
•
Temporary uses in public rights-of-way, as determined by the city commission by
resolution, specifying geographic areas, criteria, and duration of exemption, where such
uses front on or are north of 63rd Street, on Washington Avenue from 6th Street to Lincoln
Road, or in the Collins Park Arts District Overlay(as defined in section 142-854).
Uses at the North Shore Bandshell, the Ronald W. Shane Watersports Center, and the
Miami Beach Botanical Garden, as determined by the city commission by resolution.
j) Uses located on lots with a GU zoning designation fronting on Collins Avenue between
79th Street and 87th Street, as determined by the city commission by resolution.
Sec. 122-6. - Application for concurrency mitigation review and mobility fees.
j. For those concurrency and mobility requirements for which the Miami Beach Planning
Department is the Applicable Review Department, an applicant may file an application for
an estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees prior to filing an application for a
development order, __= _ =–__ --=- -=__ =-–__—_–___ =_– _ – =_T.: or at any
other time, in order to obtain information on the availability of public facilities for a parcel
of land.
An application for an estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees shall include
such information as required by the city including, without limitation, the following
information:
(1) Name of applicant;
(2) Location, size, legal description, folio number, and existing use of the parcel or portion
thereof proposed for development;
A description of the use, density, and intensity of use for existing and proposed
development, with adequate supporting information and studies, which may include a
building permit application, certificate of occupancy, certificate of use, business tax
receipts, or other documentation, as applicable;
L Schedule for phased developments;
Description of any proposed on-site or off-site infrastructure improvements;
(6) Any building permit documents that may be required by the Planning Department;
(7) The date of demolition permit, if applicable;
(8) Any other documents which may be requested by the Planning Department; and
a) An administrative fee, as set forth in Appendix A to this code, to offset the actual costs
of the City's review of an application for an estimate of concurrency mitigation and
mobility fees.
Within ten days after receipt of an application for concurrency mitigation review and
mobility fees, each Applicable Review Department shall determine whether the application
Page 17 of 32
•
is complete. If the application is determined to be incomplete, the Applicable Review
Department shall notify the applicant in writing that the application is incomplete and shall
identify the additional information required to be submitted. Until all required information is
provided and an application is determined to be complete, an Applicable Review
Department shall take no further action in regard to the application.
Sec. 122-7. — Enforcement and penalties.
Any person, firm, corporation, or partnership that violates (or aids in a violation of) any
provision of this chapter may be subject to enforcement, as outlined herein.
A violation of this chapter includes, but is not limited to, the failure, neglect, or refusal to pay
a mobility fee; provide or perform all obligations pursuant to a concurrency mitigation program;
pay a concurrency mitigation fee as required by this chapter; or a failure or refusal to comply
with any other provision of this chapter. A violation of this chapter shall also include furnishing
untrue, incomplete,false, or misleading information on any document, or to any city employee,
concerning (i) the calculation, exemption, or payment of a mobility fee or concurrency
mitigation fee; (ii) the entitlement to a refund; or (iii) the proposal, negotiation, terms, or
performance of obligations pursuant to a concurrency mitigation program or agreement.
Penalties and enforcement.
jj A violation of this chapter shall be subject to the following civil fines, in addition to any
outstanding fees owed pursuant to this chapter:
a. If the violation is the first violation, a person or business shall receive a civil fine of
$1,000.00;
b. If the violation is the second violation within the preceding six months, a person or
business shall receive a civil fine of$2,000.00;
c. If the violation is the third violation within the preceding six months, a person or
business shall receive a civil fine of$3,000.00;
d. If the violation is the fourth or subsequent violation within the preceding six months,
a person or business shall receive a civil fine of$4,000.00.
,) Enforcement. The code compliance department shall enforce this section. This shall not
preclude other law enforcement agencies from any action to assure compliance with this
section and all applicable laws. If a violation of this section is observed, the code
enforcement officer will be authorized to issue a notice of violation. The notice shall inform
the violator of the nature of the violation, amount of fine for which the violator is liable,
instructions and due date for paying the fine, that the violation may be appealed by
requesting an administrative hearing before a special master within ten (10) days after
service of the notice of violation, and that the failure to appeal the violation within ten (10)
days of service shall constitute an admission of the violation and a waiver of the right to a
hearing.
a) Rights of violators; payment of fine; right to appear; failure to pay civil fine or to appeal;
appeals from decisions of the special master.
Page 18 of 32
a. A violator who has been served with a notice of violation must elect to either:
i_ pay the civil fine in the manner indicated on the notice of violation; or
ii. request an administrative hearing before a special master to appeal the
notice of violation, which must be requested within ten (10) days of the
service of the notice of violation.
b. The procedures for appeal by administrative hearing of the notice of violation shall
be as set forth in sections 30-72 and 30-73 of this Code. Applications for hearings
must be accompanied by a fee as approved by a resolution of the city commission,
which shall be refunded if the named violator prevails in the appeal.
c. If the named violator, after issuance of the notice of violation, fails to pay the civil
fine, or fails to timely request an administrative hearing before a special master,
the special master may be informed of such failure by report of the code
enforcement officer. The failure of the named violator to appeal the decision of the
code enforcement officer within the prescribed time period shall constitute a waiver
of the violator's right to an administrative hearing before the special master, and
shall be treated as an admission of the violation, for which fines and penalties shall
be assessed accordingly.
d. A certified copy of an order imposing a fine may be recorded in the public records,
and thereafter shall constitute a lien upon any real or personal property owned by
the violator, which may be enforced in the same manner as a court judgment by
the sheriffs of this state, including levy against the violator's real or personal
property, but shall not be deemed to be a court judgment except for enforcement
purposes. On or after the sixty-first (61st) day following the recording of any such
lien that remains unpaid, the City may foreclose or otherwise execute upon the
Hen.
e. Any party aggrieved by a decision of a special master may appeal that decision to
a court of competent jurisdiction.
f. The special master shall be prohibited from hearing the merits of the notice of
violation or considering the timeliness of a request for an administrative hearing if
the violator has failed to request an administrative hearing within ten (10) days of
the service of the notice of violation.
g, The special master shall not have discretion to alter the penalties prescribed in
subsection (c)(1).
(d) In addition to enforcement of this division through issuance of a violation, the city may withhold
issuance of the certificate of occupancy, certificate of use or change of use approval, and/or
bring suit to restrain, enjoin, or otherwise prevent violation of this chapter in any court of
competent jurisdiction, to recover costs incurred by the city in whole or in part because of a
violation of this chapter, and/or to compel payment of a mobility fee or concurrency mitigation
fee pursuant to this chapter. Issuance of and/or payment of a citation for violation of this
division does not preclude the city from filing such a suit. Payment of any penalties imposed
Page 19 of 32
does not release a person or entity from payment of the mobility fee due or concurrency
mitigation, but shall be payable in addition to the mobility fee or concurrency mitigation.
Secs. 122-8-122-10. - Reserved.
ARTICLE II. - CONCURRENCY
Sec. 122-11. - Level of service standards.
A determination of concurrency for recreation and open space, potable water, sanitary
sewer, solid waste, public schools, and storm water management facilities shall be based
on the levels of service established in the capital improvements element of the
comprehensive plan of the city, at the time the proposed development is projected to
generate a demand for services. The City of Miami Beach is designated as a
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and, as such, all development and
redevelopment is exempt from a obtaining a determination of transportation concurrency;
however, development shall be subject to the payment of a mobility fee, unless otherwise
provided in this chapter.
(b) For the purposes of a determination of concurrency, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid
waste, and storm water management facilities shall be deemed available if they are:
In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency;
(2) Funded, programmed, and scheduled to be available by the applicable city, state, or
other governmental agency at the time the proposed development is projected to
generate a demand for services; or
(3) The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the city or
other applicable agency, which will ensure that the facilities will be provided at the time
the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services.
For the purposes of a determination of concurrency, recreation and open space facilities
shall be deemed available if they are:
(1) In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency.
gj Funded, programmed, and scheduled to be available by the applicable city, state, or
other governmental agency at the time the proposed development is projected to
generate a demand for services; or
(3) The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the city or
other applicable governmental agency, which will ensure that the facilities will be
provided at the time the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for
services; or
Programmed or otherwise committed to be provided as soon as reasonably possible
such that a substandard level of service does not exist for a period of more than one
Page 20 of 32
•
(1) year after the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for
services; or
(5) A proportionate fair-share concurrency mitigation fee is paid, which will allow the City
to build the facilities for which there is a substandard level of service.
Sec. 122-12. - Determination of concurrency.
(a) As part of an application for a development order that increases the density or intensity of
a site, as applicable, each Applicable Review Department shall make a determination of
concurrency in accordance with section 122-26 as to whether required public facilities are
or will be available when needed to serve the proposed development; determine the
effective period during which such facilities will be available to serve the proposed
development; and issue an invoice for necessary concurrency mitigation fees or identify
other mitigation measures.
(b) Capacity credits shall be given for legally established uses as follows:
(1) For existing structures that have an active use, the current use shall be used as the
basis for calculating capacity credits.
(2) For vacant structures or structures undergoing construction, the last active use shall
be used as the basis for calculating capacity credits.
(3) For vacant land, the last active use shall be used as the basis for calculating capacity
credits, provided the activity has not been inactive for more than ten (10) years.
(c) In the event the determination is made that the required public facilities will not be available
where needed to serve the proposed development, an applicant for concurrency mitigation
may propose a mitigation program in order to avoid a negative determination of
concurrency. The proposed mitigation program shall be based on the same methodology
utilized by the Applicable Review Department for determining concurrency, and shall
include a specific delineation of responsibilities for providing the required public facility
improvements, adequate methods for securing performance of the mitigation program,
payment of mitigation funds, and a proposed recapture program for the provision of excess
capacity, if applicable. Such mitigation program shall be reviewed and, if the program
satisfies the concurrency requirements herein, the program shall be approved by the
Applicable Review Departments of the city and other agencies having jurisdiction. The
applicant shall enter into a mitigation agreement with the city, committing to the mitigation
program, which agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the city attorney.
(d) If the Applicable Review Department determines that the required public facilities are or
will be available to serve the proposed development as provided in section 122-11, the
Applicable Review Department shall issue a finding of concurrency mitigation which shall
be effective for a period of one (1) year from the date of the issuance of the determination,
unless otherwise specified in the finding. An extension of this one-year period may be
'ranted b the A..licable Review De.artment for an additional six 6 months .rovided
that an application fora city development order is being diligently pursued, and provided
that an extension is requested within the original one-year period. In the event the issuance
Page 21 of 32
•
•
of a concurrency mitigation certificate is based on an approved mitigation-program, such
certificate shall be expressly conditioned upon compliance with such program.
(e) A determination of concurrency mitigation will expire within one(1)year of issuance, unless
a building permit is obtained or a mitigation fee is paid. This one-year period for a
reservation of capacity, may be extended one time for an additional year for good cause
shown, provided that an application to the Applicable Review Department for an extension
is made within the original one-year period.
f) If a mitigation fee is paid and the development does not receive a building permit, or the
use does not become legally established, a refund can only be requested within one (1)
year of the date of payment.
(q) If the Applicable Review Department determines that the required public facilities are not
and will not be available to serve the proposed development, and that an acceptable
mitigation program has not been provided, the Applicable Review Department shall issue
a notice of negative determination of concurrency and identify service areas experiencing
deficiency, and the improvements or fair-share concurrency mitigation payment necessary
to allow the development to proceed. If a notice of negative determination is rendered, no
further review of any associated applications for development order shall be conducted
unless or until a new or modified application of an estimate of concurrency mitigation and
mobility fees is filed, and a determination of concurrency is made.
(h) Applicable Review Departments other than departments or agencies of the City of Miami
Beach may utilize alternative procedures from those identified in this section to determine
concurrency.
Secs. 122-13-122-20. - Reserved.
ARTICLE 3. - MOBILITY FEES
Sec. 122-21. - Legislative intent.
The City Commission hereby finds, determines, as declares as follows:
Pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, the city
has broad home rule powers to adopt ordinances to provide for and operate transportation
systems, including roadways, transit facilities, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities within the city.
(b) The Community Planning Act, at Section 163.3180(5)(i), Florida Statutes (as may be
amended from time to time), provides for mobility fees, based on an adopted transportation
mobility plan, as an alternative means by which local governments may allow development
consistent with an adopted Comprehensive Plan to equitably mitigate transportation impact.
Section 163.3180(5)(i), Florida Statutes, requires that a mobility fee must be based upon an
adopted transportation mobility plan. The City of Miami Beach has adopted a Transportation
Master Plan, identifying a prioritized list of multimodal improvements, which serves as the
basis for the mobility fee imposed. The Master Plan provides an analysis of existing traffic
Page 22 of 32
conditions and travel characteristics. The existing citywide mode share is as follows, pursuant
to the adopted City of Miami Beach 2016 Transportation Master Plan:
Existing Citywide Mode Share
56.5%
12a 14% 5.5% 12%
f �
PRIVATE TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN BIKE OTHER
VEHICLES
j The City has established a Citywide mode share goal that seeks to reduce travel by motor
vehicle and increase the share of travel made by riding transit, walking, and riding a bicycle.
The list of multimodal improvements established in the Transportation Master Plan are
intended to address future citywide travel demand and achieve the City's 2035 mode share
goals, as follows:
2035 Mode Share Vision
43%
20% 17% 8°a 12%
11
PRIVATE TRANSIT WALKING BIKING OTHER
VEHICLES
ipj The city's mobility fee program, established pursuant to this chapter, shall be effective ninety
(90) days following the adoption of this Ordinance. Developments that have obtained a land
use board approval, or a building permit process number, prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance shall be subject to the concurrency requirements applicable prior to the effective
date of the mobility fee program.
Page 23 of 32
. R
Sec. 122-22. - Adoption of mobility fee study.
The City Commission hereby adopts and incorporates the following study by reference hereto:
The mobility fee study, entitled "City of Miami Beach Mobility Fee Technical Analysis," and dated
August 2018, including without limitation the assumptions, conclusions, and findings in such study
as to the methodology for the calculation of the city's mobility fee and the trip generation rates
assigned to various land use categories.
Sec. 122-23. - Imposition and collection of mobility fees.
Mobility fees shall be assessed upon the issuance of a building permit or change of use for
any development within the city. Mobility fees shall be calculated in the manner set forth in
section 122-26 hereof and the mobility fee study referenced in section 122-22.
a) Mobility fees assessed in connection with the issuance of a development order shall be
collected and paid prior to or concurrent with the issuance of the building permit.
(2) Mobility fees assessed in connection with a change of use shall be collected and paid
prior to issuance of the certificate of use, business tax receipt, or other similar approval.
The mobility fee shall be computed at the difference between the rate established in the
mobility fee schedule for the proposed use and the rate established in the mobility fee
schedule for the current use.
Modifications to an existing use and changes of use which do not result in a higher
assessment under the mobility fee schedule shall be exempted from payment of the mobility
fee.
The city shall also require a site-specific multimodal transportation analysis and mitigation
plan pursuant to the applicable land use board application requirements set forth in chapter
118.
Sec. 122-24. - Calculation of mobility fee.
(b) The calculation of the mobility fee requires the adjustment of the Person Miles of Travel (PMT)
for each land use by the Origin and Destination Adjustment Factor (ODAF). The ODAF is
equal to 0.5. Trip generation rates represent trip-ends at the site of a land use. Thus, a single-
origin trip from a residence to a workplace counts as one trip-end for the residence and one
trip-end for the workplace, for a total of two trip-ends. To avoid double-counting of trips, the
PMT for each land use shall be multiplied by 0.5. This distributes the impact of travel equally
between the origin and destination of the trip, and eliminates double charging for trips. The
PMT for each land use begins with the entering and exiting daily trips for each land use. The
adjusted PMT is then multiplied by the PMT rate of$129.37 to determine the mobility fee rate
per each land use on the mobility fee schedule.
The formulas for each step in the calculation of the mobility fee are as follows:
Page 24 of 32
Person Trips(PT)per Land Use = (TG x%NEW)x PMT Factor
Person Trips(PT) by Mode = PT x MS for each of the five modes of travel
Person Mile of Travel (PMT)per Land l/se = SUM of(PT by Mode*TL by MODE)
Person Mlle of Travel (PMT)Rahe = $128,37 per PMT
Mobility Fee(MF) per Land.Use = (PMT,.ODAF):,PMT RT
Where:
PT = Person Trips,
PMTF _, Person Mlles of Travel Factor of 1.33 to,account for
multi-modal travel
TG = Daily Trip Generation during average weekday
NEWPercent of trips that are primary trips,as opposed to
% pass-by or diverted-link trips
Mode Share Goals per Miami Beach Transportation
MS Plan for each of the five modes of travel
IL = Average length of a trip by Mode and,by,Trip Purpose
PMT = Person Miles of Travel
PMT RT' _ Person Miles of Travel Rate =$129.37
Origin and Destination.Adjustment Factor of.50 to
ODAF = avoid double-counting trips for origin and destination
MF = Mobility Fee calculated by (PMT x.5O)x PMT RT
The adopted mobility fee for each land use category are set forth in "Schedule A," below:
Schedule A— Mobility Fee
Mobility Fee Schedule Unit of Mobility
Cate•o /Land Use T e Measure Fee
Residential
Single Family with a unit size less than 3,500 sq. ft.
weal Per Unit $1,847
Single Family with a unit size between 3,500 and 7,000 sq.
ft. , Per Unit $2,461
Single Fami!r with a unit size greater than 7,000 sq. ft.AM
fieer=area1 Per Unit $3,076
Multi Family Apartments Per Unit $1,515
Affordable Housing Per Unit $379
Workforce Housing Per Unit $758
Page 25 of 32
$171-36
Co-Iivingi Micro Apartments Per Unit $758
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) Per Berth $308
Golf Course Per Hole $3,881
Movie Theater Per Screen $22,823
Outdoor Commercial Recreation2 Per Acre $1,829
Community Center/ Civic/Gallery/ Lodge/ Museum Per Sq. Ft. $1.86
Indoor Commercial Recreation / Health Club/ Fitness Per Sq. Ft. $4.54
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility/ Nursing Home/Memory Care/
Congregate Care Facility/Assisted / Independent Living Per Bed $740
Private School Pre-K-12 Per S.. Ft. %2.09
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings Per Sq. Ft. $1.78
Day Care Center Per Sq. Ft. $3.87
Industrial
Warehousing / Manufacturing / Industrial / Production (under
roof) Per Sq. Ft. $1.53
Mini-Warehousing / Boat/ RVs & Other Outdoor Storage' Per Sq. Ft. $0.46
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub Per Sq. Ft. $2.14
Office
General Office/ Research / Higher Education / Financial /
Bank Per Sq. Ft. $3.33
Medical / Dental %'Clinic'/Veterinary/ Hospital ', Per Sq. Ft. $7.60
Service/ Retail / Non-Residential
Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services4 Per Sq. Ft. $10.11
Pharmac / Dis•ensa / Pain Mana•ement Clinic Per Sq. Ft. $15.40
Supermarket Per Sq. Ft, 16.37
Takeout Restaurant with no seating5 Per Sq Ft. $11.07
Restaurant with seating5 Per Seat $877,
Per Drive-
Restaurant drive-thru5 • • • Thru $9,110
Bar/ Nigh Club/ Pub without food service Per Sq. Ft. $26.12
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning /
Parts • Per Sq. Ft. $6.26
Hotel / Lodgings Per Room $1,721
Convenience Retail' Per Sq. Ft. $19.48
Per Fuel
Motor Vehicle Fueling ' Position $6,413
Per Drive
Thru Lane
Bank Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru and /or Per
Lane' ATM . $12,170
Notes:
Page 26 of 32 .
j I
'Floor area is based on areas that count towards the maximum unit size pursuant to
the single-family district regulations. - _ = _ - _ = _ -
2The s•. ft. for an buildin.s or structure shall not be excluded from the acrea.e.
'Acreage for any unenclosed material and vehicle storage shall be converted to sq. ft.
4Areas under cavo. for seatin. dis•la stora•e and sales shall be converted to s.. ft.
SSe•arate fees are associated with an drive-thru lane s associated with a restaurant.
6Restaurant/Bar/Night Club and/or Retail Sales, that are not exclusive to hotel guests only,
shall be calculated based on the separate applicable Land Use Classification.
'Convenience Retail rates are separate from the fee due for vehicle fueling positions. Rates
per vehicle fueling position also apply to gas stations and service stations with fuel pumps.
The fee for any restaurant square footage, seating or drive-thru in a convenience store will
be based on the individual fee rate for the land use not the convenience store rate.
8Bank building square footage falls under office and is an additive fee beyond the fee due
for bank/ATM drive-thru lanes or free-standing ATM's. These rates are per drive-thru lane
for the bank and per drive-thru lane with an ATM. The free-standing ATM is for an ATM only
and not an ATM within or part of another non-financial building, such as an ATM within a
grocery store.
NOTE: The list of uses in the mobility fee schedule is subject to compliance with permitted
uses in the city's land development regulations.
Mobility fee rate. Except as otherwise provided in,this subsection, the mobility fee rates
established above in "Schedule A" shall be automatically adjusted in the future by applying
the percent increase in "Consumer Price Index For All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), Not
Seasonally Adjusted, U.S. city average for all items (1982-84=100)" (To be known as Annual
CPI)from the prior year. For reference, the 2018 value is 251.107. The CPI adjustment shall
never be less than 0.0 percent. Adjustments shall take place by September 1 of each year,
and shall take effect on October 1 of each year, beginning in 2020. The adjustment calculation
is below:
The change shall be calculated as follows:
("Annual CPI" for Prior Calendar Year minus "Annual CPI" for Calendar Year
Two Years Prior)/(Annual CPI for the Calendar Year Two Years Prior) =
"Change in CPI"
then
("Change in CPI" + 1) * (Fee Currently in Force) = (New Fee for Next Year).
If the "Change in CPI" is less than 0.0, then 0.0 shall replace the actual
"Change in CPI" in the calculation for that 12-month period.
Schedule A may be adjusted administratively on an annual basis, pursuant to the formula
above.
Page 27 of 32
Incentive Areas. In order to incentivize the revitalization of targeted areas, the City
Commission hereby designates the area of the city north of 63rd Street, as a mobility fee
incentive area. Within the incentive area, a mobility fee reduction of X62.5 percent shall be
provided until August 31, 2022; between September 1, 202 , and August 31 2023a a
mobility fee reduction of 50 percent shall be provided: between September 1, 2023, and
August 31, 2024, a mobility fee reduction of 38 percent shall be provided; and between
September 1, 2024, and August 31, 2025, a mobility fee reduction of 26 percent shall be
provided.
A mobility fee administration fee, in the amount identified in Appendix A, shall be assessed,
for the purposes of calculating and processing payment of the mobility fee, as well as to fund
future mobility fee and concurrency studies.
Sec. 122-25.-Alternative independent mobility fee study.
(a) Any applicant whose land use is not listed in the mobility fee schedule shall have the option
to provide an independent mobility fee study prepared in accordance with the methodology
outlined in section 122-24.
(b) The city manager is hereby authorized to reject any independent mobility fee study that does
not meet the standards in section 122-24. The applicant shall provide notice of its intent to
provide an independent mobility fee study not later than sixty days following issuance of the
building permit or approval for a change of use.
Upon submission of the independent mobility fee study, the study shall require a review at the
applicant's expense, pursuant to section 118-6. If the independent mobility fee study cannot
be completed and a final determination of sufficiency made by the city manager, prior to
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the development, the applicant shall pay the
applicable mobility fee pursuant to the provisions of this article prior to obtaining a certificate
of occupancy.
However, if the mobility fee study is subsequently accepted by the city manager, following
issuance of the certificate of occupancy, a refund shall be made to the applicant to the extent
that the mobility fee paid was higher than the mobility fee determined in the independent
mobility fee study.
Sec. 122-26. - Mobility fee land uses.
Mobility fee calculations shall be based upon the following schedule of land uses, measured per
square foot, unless noted otherwise.
Residential`— Per Unit
LU Single Family with a unit size less than 3,500 sq. ft.
Single Family with a unit size between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft.
Single Family with a unit size greater than 7,000 sa. ft.
01 Multi Family Apartments (market rate) — '-r Uni
151 Affordable Pilierideree-Housinq — Per Unit
Page 28 of 32
a) Workforce Housing — Per Unit
2) Co-living — Per Unit
(b) Recreation and Entertainment
Lll Marina (Including dry storage)— Per Berth
(2) Golf Course — Per Hole
a Movie Theater— Per Screen
14) Outdoor Commercial Recreation— Per Acre
j) Community Center/Civic/Gallery/Lodge/Museum
Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility/ Nursing Home/ Memory Care/ Congregate Care Facility/
Assisted/ Independent Living — Per Bed
Private School (Pre-K-12)
gi Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings
Day Care Center
j Industrial
a) Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
Mini-Warehousing/Boat/RVs & Other Outdoor Storage
(3) Distribution/Fulfillment Center/Package Delivery Hub
Office
(1) General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
Medical/Dental/ClinicNeterinary/Hospitals
l Service / Retail / Non-Residential •
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services
2) Pharmacy/ Medical Cannabis Treatment Center/ Pain Management Clinic
)3) Supermarket
14) Takeout Restaurant with no seating
Restaurant with seating— Per Seat
Restaurant drive-through — Per drive-through
7) Bar/ Night Club / Pub without food service
(8) Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales /Service/ Repair/ Cleaning / Parts
(9) Hotel / Lodging — Per Room
(10) Convenience Retail
(11) Motor Vehicle Fueling — Per Fuel Position
Page 29 of 32
•
(12) Bank Drive-Through Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Through Lane — Per Drive
Through Lane and/or Per ATM. A bank without drive-through lanes or a drive-through
ATM shall only be charged a mobility fee based on the office rate. A convenience store
without gas pumps shall only be charged a mobility fee based on the square footage of
the convenience store.
Sec. 122-27. - Mobility fee benefit district.
Miami Beach shall have a single Citywide Mobility Fee Benefit District.
Sec. 122-28. - Mobility fee fund established.
There is hereby established a mobility fee fund for the Mobility Fee Benefit District established in
section 122 28122-27 hereof. For accountin. •ur•oses the mobilit fee fund shall be considered
a special revenue fund. Transportation concurrency mitigation funds collected prior to or
subsequent to the adoption of this ordinance shall be deposited into the mobility fee fund, and
shall only be used for the purposes established in section 122 30.122-29.
Sec. 122-29. - Use of mobility fee fund.
The mobility fee fund shall be used by the city to fund capital expenses associated with
transportation facilities, or portions thereof, that are located in the city, and that are included
in the city's adopted capital improvement plan, transportation master plan, or comprehensive
plan, and shall benefit new development located within the city.
(b) The fund may be used to further the goals of the city to reduce dependence on single-
occupant vehicle trips, and encourage use of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes as a
means of commuting and recreational mobility. Eligible projects may include, without
limitation:
Carpools,
Van pools;
(3) Demand response service;
(4) Paratransit services (for special needs population);
0] Public/private provision of transit service, bike sharing, or shared car initiatives;
Provision of short term and long-term bicycle parking, showers, and changing facilities;
(7) Provision of parking for carpools; •
Alternative hours of travel, including flexible work hours, staggered work shifts,
compressed work weeks and telecommuting options;
L9_) Subsidy of transit fares;
(10) Use of long-term parking to be developed at or near the city's entry points;
(11) Shared vehicular and pedestrian access for compatible land uses, where possible;
(12) Shared parking agreements for compatible land uses, where possible;
(13) Provision of transit amenities;
(14) Car share vehicle parking;
(15) Traffic management and traffic monitoring programs;
Page 30 of 32
•
(16) Incident management;
(17) Congestion management;
(18) Access management;
(19) Parking policies which discourage single-occupancy vehicles;
(20) The encouragement of carpools, vanpools, or ridesharing;
(21) Programs or projects that improve traffic flow, including projects to improve signalization;
(22) On road bicycle lanes, bicycle parking, and bicycle amenities at commercial and
residential uses;
(23) Improve intersections,and implement Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)strategies,
including pedestrian oriented intersection design strategies;
(24) Pedestrian countdown signals;
(25) Medians for pedestrian refuge and curb extensions; and
(26) Timing signals to minimize pedestrian delay and conflicts.
If the capital expenses of a transportation facility will be fully paid from the mobility fee fund,
the city manager shall make a written determination that(i)the demand for the transportation
facility is reasonably attributable to new development in the city, and (ii) the transportation
facility is not intended to alleviate an existing deficiency in the city's transportation network.
4) If a portion of the demand for the transportation facility is reasonably attributable to new
development in the city and a portion of the transportation facility will alleviate an existing
deficiency in the city's transportation network, the city manager shall make a written
determination of the percentage of the transportation facility attributable to new development
and that percentage of the capital expenses (but not the deficiency portion) may be paid from
the mobility fee fund.
Any expenditure from a mobility fee fund not specifically authorized by this division article shall
be repaid to the mobility fee fund from lawfully available revenue of the city.
SECTION 5. Appendix A of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, entitled "Fee Schedule," is
hereby amended as follows:
APPENDIX A
FEE SCHEDULE
:Annual.
Adjustment
�� Amount (References
(Sales tax
"Section of ptionor other ''shown are
Descri _
this Code �:defined at
• taxes may the end of
apply) this '
�.... Appendix A)
Subpart B. Land Development Regulations
* * *
Page 31 of 32
Chapter 122. Concurrency and Mobility Fees
122-24 Mobility Fee Administration Fee 400.00
122-24 Review of, Estimate of Concurrency Mitigation 200.00
and Mobility Fee
SECTION 6. APPLICABILITY.
This Ordinance shall not apply to developments that have an approved Order from the
Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board, Historic Preservation Board, or Planning Board
issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, or to developments that have been issued a
building permit process number prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. REPEALER.
All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all section and parts of sections in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION 8. CODIFICATION.
It is the intention of the City Commission, and it is hereby ordained, that the provisions of
this Ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, as
'amended; that the sections of this Ordinance may be re-numbered or re-lettered to accomplish
such intention; and that the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section" or other appropriate
word.
SECTION 9. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the
remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect 90 days following adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this /6' day of oc4ber , 2019.
Ai:000
Dan Gelber, Mayor
ATTES '
I J2S Coq
Raf el E. Granado, City Clerk
First Reading: September 11, 2019 APPROVED AS TO FORM
Second Reading: October 16, 2019 AND LANGUAGE
AND F R EXECUTION
ioNVIM 1111.4
e , - (U- L3-(i
Verified by: 1 _ �.� ` ..'•it 4 eyv9� , Date
� N�
omas . Mooney,'AICP _�, ; '' '� ����
Planning Director
#:17*.
••INCORP •
. URA i L-D ,
Pag 2•.of 32
Ordinances - R5 J
MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: October 16, 2019
1:30 p.m. Second Reading Public Hearing
SUBJECT: MOBILITY FEES - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SUBPART B OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING CHAPTER 118,
ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE
VI, ENTITLED "DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES," AT SECTION 118-253,
ENTITLED "APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW," AND CHAPTER 118,
ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE
X, ENTITLED "HISTORIC PRESERVATION," DIVISION 3, ENTITLED
"ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/CERTIFICATE
TO DIG/CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION," AT
SECTION 118-562, ENTITLED "APPLICATION," TO MODIFY
REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC STUDIES CONSISTENT WITH REVISED
CONCURRENCY STANDARDS; AMENDING CHAPTER 122, ENTITLED
"CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT," TO BE RENAMED AS "CONCURRENCY
MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES"; DELETING, AMENDING, AND
RESTATING PROVISIONS IN SECTIONS 122-1 THROUGH 122-10;
CREATING ARTICLE I, ENTITLED "PURPOSE AND GENERAL
PROVISIONS," SECTION 122-1, ENTITLED "PURPOSE," TO STATE THE
PURPOSE FOR CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-2,
ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS," TO ESTABLISH DEFINITIONS RELATED TO
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-3,
ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEE
REQUIRED," TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCURRENCY
REVIEW AND CALCULATION AND PAYMENT OF MOBILITY FEES;
SECTION 122-4, ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND
MOBILITY FEE REVIEW," TO ESTABLISH DEPARTMENTAL AND AGENCY
RESPONSIBILITY FOR REVIEW OF SPECIFIC CONCURRENCY AND
MOBILITY FEE REQUIREMENTS; SECTION 122-5, ENTITLED
"EXEMPTIONS FROM CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY
FEES," TO PROVIDE EXEMPTIONS FROM CONCURRENCY REVIEW
AND MOBILITY FEE PAYMENT TO INCENTIVIZE DEVELOPMENT UNDER
CERTAIN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS; SECTION 122-6, ENTITLED
"APPLICATION FOR CONCURRENCY MITIGATION REVIEW AND
MOBILITY FEES," TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEES; AND SECTION 122-
Page 1374 of 2557
7, ENTITLED "ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES," TO ESTABLISH
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES; ESTABLISHING
ARTICLE II, ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY," SECTION 122-11, ENTITLED
"LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS," TO ESTABLISH LEVELS OF
SERVICE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND SECTION 122-12, ENTITLED
"DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY," TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES
FOR THE CALCULATION OF CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS AND
CAPACITY CREDITS; ESTABLISHING ARTICLE ILL, ENTITLED
"MOBILITY FEES," SECTION 122-21, ENTITLED "LEGISLATIVE INTENT,"
TO PROVIDE THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR, AND INTENT OF, THE
MOBILITY FEE PROGRAM; SECTION 122-22, "ADOPTION OF MOBILITY
FEE STUDY," TO INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE CITY OF MIAMI
BEACH MOBILITY FEE TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, DATED AUGUST 2018;
SECTION 122-23, "IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF MOBILITY FEES,"
TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IMPOSITION AND
COLLECTION OF MOBILITY FEE; SECTION 122-24, "CALCULATION OF
MOBILITY FEES," TO ESTABLISH MOBILITY FEES AND THE
METHODOLOGY FOR THECALCULATION OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION
122-25, "ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FEE STUDY," TO
CREATE A PROCEDURE FOR THE REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE
INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FEE STUDIES TO DETERMINE THE IMPACT
AND MOBILITY FEES FOR LAND USES NOT DEFINED IN THE CODE;
SECTION 122-26, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE LAND USES," TO
ESTABLISH SCHEDULE OF LAND USES FOR THE CALCULATION OF
MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-27, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT
DISTRICT," TO DESIGNATE THE ENTIRE CITY AS A MOBILITY FEE
BENEFIT DISTRICT; SECTION 122-28, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE FUND
ESTABLISHED," TO ESTABLISH A MOBILITY FEE FUND; SECTION 122-
29, ENTITLED "USE OF MOBILITY FEE FUND," TO SPECIFY PERMITTED
USES OF MOBILITY FEE PROCEEDS; AND AMENDING "APPENDIX A-
FEE SCHEDULE," TO PROVIDE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR
CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEE REVIEW; AND PROVIDING FOR
APPLICABILITY, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
RECOMMENDATION
The administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the subject ordinance.
ANALYSIS
HISTORY
On March 9, 2016, the City Commission appropriated funds for the administration to undertake
a study for the establishment of a mobility fee.
On July 25, 2018, at the request of Commissioner John Elizabeth Aleman, the City
Commission referred a discussion item on the proposed citywide mobility fee program to the
Finance and Citywide Projects Committee (FCWPC) pursuant to item C4U. On September
14, 2018, the FCWPC discussed the item and continued it until staff was able to undertake
Page 1375 of 2557
additional study and community outreach.
On September 24 and 25, 2018, planning and transportation staff met with representatives of
the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce to review the proposed mobility fee. On November 6,
2018 planning and transportation staff made a presentation to the Board of Directors of the
Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce to provide them with further information on the proposed
mobility fee. Phone conferences were also held with other stakeholders.
On October 9, 2018, an overview of the proposed mobility fee was presented to the Miami
Beach LGBTQ Advisory Committee. On November 30, 2018, the FCWPC discussed the
item and continued it so that additional study could be undertaken by staff.
On February 22, 2019, the FCWPC discussed the item and recommended that City
Commission transmit the item to the Planning Board and for the Planning Board to consider the
following specific items:
1) The feasibility of building into the mobility fee incentives for affordable housing;
2)A reassessment of the restaurant mobility fee; and
3)A potential graduated mobility fee phase-in for North Beach.
On March 13, 2019, at the request of Commissioner John Elizabeth Aleman, the City
Commission referred the item to the Planning Board (Item C4 S).
PLANNING ANALYSIS
State of Florida Framework
The Florida legislature has enacted a number of changes over the last several years that impact
growth management and local government's ability to require that new development mitigate its
impact to the transportation system. The state of Florida passed the Growth Management Act of
1985 that required all local governments in Florida to adopt comprehensive plans to guide future
development The act mandated that adequate public facilities must be provided "concurrent"
with the impacts of new development. State mandated "concurrency" was adopted to ensure the
health, safety and general welfare of the public. The introduction of "transportation concurrency"
focused on accommodating the travel demand from new development by adding roadway
capacity through construction of new roads and the widening of existing roads. Transportation
concurrency, while well intended, had the unintended consequence of driving development away
from urban areas, where road capacity was unavailable or cost prohibitive to provide, to
suburban and rural areas where road capacity was readily available or cheaper to construct. The
State enacted several programs in the following decades to address these unintended
consequences.
House Bill 319, otherwise known as the "Community Planning Act," was adopted by the Florida
Legislature in 2013 and is the State's most recent approach to providing transportation facilities
for new development. Among many other changes, the Community Planning Act established
mobility fees, based on an adopted transportation mobility plan, as an alternative means by
which local governments may allow development consistent with an adopted Comprehensive
Plan to equitably mitigate its transportation impact. The intent of mobility fees is to eliminate
transportation concurrency, proportionate share and impact fees and enact a streamlined,
simplified mitigation mechanism whereby a development can mitigate its impact through a one-
time payment.
In general, the foundations of a mobility fee are the mobility policies and projects integrated into
a municipality's comprehensive plan. The mobility policies will need to include the establishment
Page 1376 of 2557
of a horizon year, mobility district(s) and, where applicable, multimodal quality of service
standards for a multi-modal transportation system and policies that articulate how those
standards will be achieved. The standards are for planning purposes, not for regulating the
timing or approval of development. A mobility plan or projects identified in a municipality's
adopted transportation plan or in its comprehensive plan serve as the basis for the types of
mobility projects to be provided within a municipality.
Miami Beach Transportation Mitigation Overview:1999 Municipal Mobility Plan (MMP)
In 2000, the city adopted a concurrency fee ordinance to assess and mitigate the transportation
impacts of private developments on the city's roadway network.At that time, the concurrency fee
ordinance was premised on the city's adopted 1999 MMP.
The city's concurrency fee is in essence a fee based on the cost of all capacity improvements
recommended in the 1999 MMP divided by the number of additional vehicular trips that could be
accommodated by the recommended capacity improvements in the MMP, if implemented.
Proposed development is required to pay the city a concurrency fee calculated as the product
of the city's established cost per trip and the number of trips anticipated to be generated by the
proposed development. Concurrency fee revenues are then used by the city to fund new
capacity improvement projects to mitigate the transportation impacts of new developments.
It is important to note that the city's concurrency fee was and still is based on a vehicular-trip
methodology as opposed to a multimodal or person-trip methodology. Also, the existing
concurrency fee ordinance does not provide for CPI increases to the fee to adjust for inflation
over time. Further, the vast majority of projects recommended in the 1999 MMP project bank
(found feasible) have been implemented over the past 18 years.
Recent History: 2016 Transportation Master Plan (TMP)
In Apnl 2016, the City Commission took a bold step by adopting the 2016 TMP. The TMP
project bank is based on the adopted modal prioritization strategy consisting of: pedestrians
first; bicycles, transit, and freight second; and private vehicles third. As such, the TMP
recommends over 150 multimodal projects intended to transition the city from a vehicular-based
transportation system to a multimodal transportation system that focuses on pedestrian, bicycle,
and transit trips to maximize the capacity of the roadway network and, ultimately, person through-
put. The TMP is based on a 20-year horizon. Since the current TMP focuses on multimodal
solutions, a traditional automobile/vehicle-based concurrency system is not the optimal solution.
A mobility fee is more representative of all forms of transportation. State law allows counties
and municipalities to charge and collect a concurrency fee to mitigate the transportation impacts
of new developments, however state law requires that there be a rational nexus between the
concurrency fee being charged, the impacts of the new developments on the roadway network,
and the implementation of improvements to mitigate the transportation impacts of the additional
trips generated by new developments. In order to continue charging a concurrency fee and
prove rational nexus as required by state law, the city would need to update its existing
concurrency fee to one that is based on the adopted 2016 TMP.
More progressive cities have implemented or are moving towards a new transportation
approach that assesses impacts of vehicular trips generated by proposed developments based
on both the length of the trips (vehicle miles traveled) and type of trip (local vs regional), rather
than only on the number of vehicular trips anticipated to be generated by a development. This
more progressive approach to transportation concurrency is referred to as a mobility fee
program. Several local governments in Florida have already adopted these types of programs,
including but not limited to; Broward County, Hillsborough County, the City of Gainesville, the
City of Jacksonville, the City of Orlando, and the City of Tampa, the City of Sarasota. Locally,
Miami Lakes has adopted a mobility fee and Miami-Dade County is also considering moving in
this direction.
Page 1377 of 2557
On September 14, 2018, the administration presented the proposed mobility fee program to
the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee (FCWPC). After some discussion, the
committee requested that the administration complete the following tasks and return to the
FCW PC for further discussion and direction:
1. Reach out to the business community regarding the proposed mobility fee.
2. Provide a range of scenarios showing how the proposed mobility fee would impact various
land uses.
3. Consider a discounted fee for North Beach.
At the November 30, 2018 FCWPC meeting, the committee supported the mobility fee model.
A comparison of Miami Beach impact fees with other municipalities was requested. A potential
fee waiver for targeted areas of Miami Beach was also discussed. Lastly, the committee
recommended close coordination between TMP projects and G.O. Bond program projects.
At the February 22, 2019 FCWPC meeting, the Committee restated its support of the mobility
fee model. The impact fee comparison with other Miami-Dade County municipalities was
presented by the Administration and reviewed by the Committee, and the Committee concurred
that the proposed Miami Beach fees were generally in-line with those of neighboring
municipalities. The FCWPC agreed to forward the item to the City Commission for review by
the Planning Board, and to include in the Planning Board review 1)the feasibility of building into
the mobility fee incentives for affordable housing; 2) a reassessment of the restaurant mobility
fee; and 3) a potential graduated mobility fee phase-in for North Beach.
An overview of the process and approach to developing the proposed mobility fee for Miami
Beach is described below, and also included in the attached presentation (Attachment A).
Mobility Fee Development Approach
Transportation in the City of Miami Beach has unique characteristics compared to other cities in
Florida. Travel in Miami Beach is characterized by a high percentage of tourists, shorter trips,
convenient public transportation, shuttle services, high availability of taxis, carpools, and ride
share vehicles, higher propensity for biking and walking, availability of a robust bike sharing
program, and limited to no free public parking - all factors that reduce the dependency on the
private automobile and promote alternative modes of travel. Furthermore, city policies regarding
prioritizing non-vehicular modes, creating pedestrian priority zones, and investing in greenways,
shared-use paths, and protected bike lanes will help further reduce the reliance on the private
vehicle for short trips.
Given the factors listed above, the proposed mobility fee program was tailored to Miami Beach.
First, travel demand growth was estimated using person-trips rather than only private vehicle
trips. Second, the mobility fee share for each project listed in the TMP project bank was
estimated based on whether the project is located on a state, county, or local roadway and the
potential for other funding sources. Finally, a mobility fee schedule was proposed for each land
use category.
It is important to note that through the proposed mobility fee structure, neighborhood-supportive
land uses generally associated with localized trips are incentivized, while land uses that induce
regional trips, generally associated with large scale commercial developments, are
disincentivized. Since large scale developments typically result in longer trips and
greater impact to the transportation network, the assessment for regional trips is larger than that
assessed for local trips. For example, trips to a restaurant tend to come from a greater distance
than trips to a retail establishment. Therefore, restaurant fees are higher than retail fees.
Proposed Mobility Fee Schedule
A table of the proposed mobility fee schedule for each land use category is included in page 8
of the attached presentation. As shown in the table, the fees would apply citywide. The
developed mobility fees were reviewed for reasonableness in the context of the existing
concurrency fee schedule (see attachment D for the current fee schedule).
Page 1378 of 2557
A table comparing the existing concurrency fee charges with the proposed mobility fee charges
is included in page 9 of the attached presentation. This table also calculated what the
concurrency fee would be at the present time, if adjusted by the CPI. Similar to the existing
concurrency fee program, mobility fees would be charged for new developments and changes
of use. In the case of changes of use, credits would be applied for the existing uses.
An important distinction to make is that under the city's existing concurrency fee program, single
family homes are exempted. However, under the proposed mobility fee program, some single-
family homes would be charged a one-time fee for additions/expansions given that the increase
in square footage would have an impact on local trips. Since larger homes tend to generate
more traffic due to maintenance and housekeeping staff, as well as larger families. A single-
family home would not be charged a mobility fee unless the overall square footage of the home,
including the expansion, exceeds 3,500 SF. Beyond that, a tiered fee structure would apply
wherein fees would be charged for homes that are expanded to exceed 3,500 SF up to 7,000
SF; a higher fee would be charged for homes expanded above 7,000 SF. In both tiers, the
mobility fee would apply only to the square footage increase of the home (i.e. a credit would be
applied to the existing square footage of the single-family home).
In total, the new mobility fee is estimated to generate approximately $126,878,500 in revenues
over a 20-year period. The revenues would be used by the City to implement multimodal
projects recommended in the adopted 2016 TMP over a 20-year horizon. The total cost of all
projects in the TMP project bank is approximately $902 million, thus, the plan over a 20-year
horizon. The total cost of all projects in the TMP project bank is approximately $902 million,
thus, the revenues generated by the mobility fee over a 20-year period are anticipated to cover
approximately 14.1% of the total project costs of all priority I, II, and III projects in the TMP
project bank. The balance of the project costs would be funded through federal, state, and/or
county sources, grants, and other city sources.
Mobility Fee Uses
The mobility fee funds would be used by the city to plan, design, and construct numerous
transportation improvement projects, including shared-use paths, bicycle lanes, transit lanes,
intermodal facilities, pedestrian safety and connectivity enhancements, neighborhood
greenways, pedestrian priority zones, complete streets, traffic signalization improvements, and
various intersection/roadway improvements to improve traffic safety and increase capacity. The
concurrency fee funding was tied to the projects in the 1999 MMP.
Update Provided at the November 30. 2018 FCWPC Meeting
Pursuant to FCWPC's request, Planning and Transportation Department staff have reached out
to the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce, the Miami Beach LGBTQ Advisory Committee,
the Miami Beach Latin Chamber of Commerce, and the Greater Miami and the Beaches Hotel
Association. On September 24 and 25, 2018 Planning and Transportation staff met with
representatives of the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce to review the proposed mobility
fee. Backup information was provided to the members to address their questions.
Subsequently, on November 6, planning and transportation staff made a presentation to the
board of directors of the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce to provide them with further
information on the proposed mobility fee. At the meeting, the chamber expressed concerns
with the City assessing any type of transportation impact fee. Although it was explained to the
Chamber that since 2000, all new developments and changes of use are assessed a
transportation concurrency fee by the City, the chamber advised that it would not support the
proposed Mobility Fee Program.
On October 9, 2018, an overview of the proposed mobility fee was presented to the Miami
Beach LGBTQ Advisory Committee. Background information regarding the proposed mobility
fee was also shared with the Miami Beach Latin Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Miami
Page 1379 of 2557
and the Beaches Hotel Association via telephone and e-mail. Both the Miami Beach Latin
Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Miami and the Beaches Hotel Association were invited
to the November 6, 2018 presentation to the board of directors of the Miami Beach Chamber of
Commerce. Most of the organizations understood that the mobility fee was the successor to the
concurrency program, and that action was needed now that the TMP had been adopted. The
Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce was not supportive of fees for businesses.
Additionally, pursuant to FCWPC's request, staff has provided a range of scenarios to illustrate
how the proposed mobility fee would impact a wide range of land uses. Those scenarios are
included in the updated mobility fee program presentation (attachment A). Based on the limited
scenarios prepared, in North Beach, the median increase from the current fee with CP1
adjustment would be approximately 61%. In Middle Beach, the median increase from the
current fee with CPI adjustment would be approximately -6%. In South Beach, the median
increase from the current fee with CPI adjustment would be approximately 66%.
Lastly, pursuant to FCWPC's request, staff has studied and provided options for providing a
discounted mobility fee structure intended to promote future redevelopment in North Beach.
One option would be to consider a 60% reduction in the fee for North Beach, which could
sunset after a period of time - perhaps 3 or 5 years. A decrease of 60% is suggested for North
Beach because the median increase from the current fee with CPI adjustment would be a
comparable 61%. Another option would be to phase-in the fee for North Beach over time. For
example, North Beach development projects could pay 50% of the fee for the first two years,
75% of the fee for years 3 and 4, and the full fee at year 5. The impact of the fee reductions for
North Beach is that it would result in a decrease of mobility fee funding available to fund the
implementation of projects recommended in the city's adopted 2016 TMP.
Attachment B includes the mobility fee technical analysis report completed by Keith and
Schnars.
Update Since the November 30. 2018 FCWPC Meeting
At the November 30, 2018 FCWPC meeting, the FCWPC committee concluded that the
Mobility Fee model was appropriate for Miami Beach. However, concerns were raised about
the amount of the fee and the impact of the fee on redeveloping areas such as North Beach.
Additionally, an analysis was requested to compare Miami Beach fees with fees of neighboring
communities. The fee analysis prepared by staff is depicted in Attachment C. In general, the
proposed Miami Beach mobility fees are comparable with that of neighboring communities
which include unincorporated Miami-Dade County, Miami Lakes, Miami downtown, and Coral
Gables. The analysis includes county road impact fees which are uniformly assessed on new
developments countywide, even within incorporated municipalities, and collected by districts.
However, the funds generated by the collection of these fees can only be used by the county
for the purpose of funding roadway capacity improvement projects within the districts in which
they were collected. Transportation enhancement projects such as bicycle lanes, shared-use
paths, neighborhood greenways, traffic calming, and pedestrian safety improvements are not
eligible to use county road impact fees as these projects do not generally increase the capacity
of an existing roadway facility.
Specifically, the analysis shows that the proposed mobility fee, in conjunction with Miami Beach
park concurrency fee, is lower than the impact fees for unincorporated Miami-Dade County,
Miami Lakes, and Coral Gables. The fee for Miami is only slightly lower than the fee proposed
for Miami Beach.
Page 1380 of 2557
Finally, the FCWPC requested that the administration leverage the G.O. Bond funds allocated
for above-ground improvements to fund the implementation of associated TMP projects. While
the city's initial G.O. Bond funding request for mobility enhancements was approximately $41
million, the approved G.O. Bond program budget provides for only $7 million of transportation-
related improvements as follows:
Neighborhood traffic calming and pedestrian friendly streets (project no. 42): $2
million.
Protected bicycle lanes and shared bike/pedestrian paths (project no. 43): $5 million
Potentially, on a case-by-case basis, portions of the TMP projects could be included,
funded, and implemented as part of above-ground improvements through the G.O. Bond
program. Specifically, the G.O. Bond program budget includes:
• Neighborhood above ground improvements (project no. 34): $43 million
• Sidewalk improvement program (project no. 37): $13 million
• Street pavement program (project no. 38): $30 million
In addition to meeting the requirements of state law, implementing a new and more progressive
mobility fee program to replace the city's existing concurrency fee program will better assess
the transportation impacts of new developments and provide funding for the implementation of
the TMP multimodal project bank over a 20-year horizon. Further, it will help the city achieve its
future mode share goals of being less car centric and increasing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit
trips, thereby improving mobility for all modes of transportation citywide.
The mobility fee is anticipated to generate approximately 14.1% of the total cost of
all recommended projects in the adopted TMP.
Pursuant to the FCWPC's request, a phased-in option for North Beach is being
recommended. Consistent with the North Beach Town Center ordinance public benefit fee
incentives, a 50% reduction is recommended until August 24, 2020, and a 25% reduction is
recommended between August 24, 2020 and August 24, 2025.
Since Middle Beach and North Beach are established areas of the city where development
does not need to be incentivized, no fee reductions are proposed for these areas. Finally, it is
important to note that state law requires a 90-day enactment period prior to implementing any
change to an existing impact fee or adopting new impact fees.
PLANNING BOARD REVIEW
On June 25, 2019, the Planning Board discussed the item and continued it to the July 23, 2019
Planning Board meeting. The Planning Board also directed staff to refine the incentives
incorporated in the ordinances for the following:
• affordable housing;
• a reassessment of the restaurant mobility fee;
a potential graduated mobility fee phase-in for North Beach
On July 23, 2019, the Planning Board held a public hearing and transmitted the ordinance to the
City Commission with a favorable recommendation by a vote of 5-0.
Page 1381 of 2557
SUMMARY
As encouraged by the State of Florida Community Planning Act, the proposed comprehensive
plan amendment would repeal goals, objectives, and policies related to the existing concurrency
management system, which is based on vehicular levels of service. These provisions would be
replaced with goals, objectives, and policies which would authorize a mobility fee to be
implemented through the land development regulations.
The actual mobility fees are adopted as part of the amendments to the land development
regulations and removes provisions for transportation concurrency. It also clarifies requirements
for other types of facilities that do require concurrency review, and that are more in line with the
existing land development processes.
As part of the referral, the FCWPC requested that the Planning Board discuss the following
items:
1)The feasibility of building into the mobility fee incentives for affordable housing;
2)A reassessment of the restaurant mobility fee; and
3)A potential graduated mobility fee phase-in for North Beach.
In regard to item #1, the proposed fee schedule includes a fee that is half that of what is
charged for a conventional multifamily apartment unit. A conventional multifamily unit would be
charged $1,515 whereas affordable, workforce, and micro apartments would be charged $758.
In regard to item #2, the proposed fee for restaurants is $877/seat. The current fees are
approximately $454.61/seat for South Beach, $627.57/seat for Middle Beach, and
$415.15/seat for North Beach. The average price is $499.11/seat, and if the consumer price
index had been applied, the average would be $690.75/seat. The increase is due to the actual
traffic impact of restaurants, where they are typically some of the largest traffic generators in the
city. The phasing suggested in item #3 would temporarily provide for slightly lower fees for the
North Beach area than what are currently assessed.
In regard to item #3, as recommended by the Planning Board and the administration, section
122-12(c) of the proposed ordinance establishes "incentive areas" and provide for a phasing in
of the fee for the North Beach area. A fee reduction of 62.5 percent shall be provided until
August 31, 2022; between September 1, 2022 and A"_"gust 31, 2023, a mobility fee reduction of
50 percent shall be provided; between September 1, 2023 and August 31, 2024, a mobility fee
reduction of 38 percent shall be provided; and between September 1, 2024 and August 31,
2025, a mobility fee reduction of 26 percent shall be provided.
UPDATE
Transportation and planning staff met with staff from the Economic Development department
and North Beach stakeholders to discuss the incentives incorporated into the mobility fee
ordinance. As a result of the discussion, the ordinance presented at first reading contained a
proposed incentive for North Beach to provide a 62.5% reduction until August 31, 2022
(approximately 2 years). Then a 50% reduction would remain available until August 31, 2023
(approximately 1 year). That would be followed by a 38% reduction until August 31, 2024
(approximately 1 year). A final 26% reduction would be available until August 31, 2025
(approximately 1 year). The initial 62.5% reduction may represent a slight decrease from the
transportation concurrency fees charged today (see the attached table titled "Proposed North
Beach Discount"). This would provide additional time and certainty for developers and business
Page 1382 of 2557
owners to obtain permits for their projects and a true incentive to encourage development.
No additional incentives were suggested for restaurants, as restaurants are likely to locate into
locations that were previously used as restaurants. Such locations would most likely be
grandfathered in terms of mobility fee payments and other requirements. Additionally, new
restaurants in the North Beach area would be able to take advantage of the reductions identified
in the previous paragraph.
FIRST READING UPDATE
On September 11, 2019, the City Commission approved the LDR ordinance on first reading,
with the following amendment, which has been incorporated into the draft ordinance for second
reading:
1. The incentives for North Beach were modified from a mobility fee reduction of 62.5% until
August 31, 2022 to a reduction of 50% until August 31, 2023 (approximately 3 years).
The administration has also incorporated some minor additional clarifications in the revised
ordinance to create consistency between the proposed fees for single family homes and unit
size calculations within the LDRs.
On September 11, 2019, the Commission also requested that the administration study the
following:
• Reducing the fee for affordable housing from 50%to 25%.
• Requiring micro/co-living units pay a normal amount (no reduction from conventional units).
• A 'look back' provision on an annual basis to ensure the equitable distribution of funds city
wide (south, mid and north beach).
The revised ordinance includes the recommended modification for affordable housing, and the
fee has been reduced from 50% to 25% of the cost of a conventional unit. Regarding micro/co-
living units, after further study, the administration is recommending that the fee for these units be
modified by increasing it to 75% of the cost of a conventional unit, as opposed to requiring the
same fee as a conventional housing unit. This modification is also included in the revised
ordinance.
The smaller reduction for micro/co-living units is recommended because the regulations for
impact and mobility fees require that they be proportionate to the impact of the use. A previous
comprehensive plan amendment established that co-living units have a lower impact than
conventional units because they house fewer people due to their smaller size. The proposed
fee of 75%would be consistent with this.
Regarding the 'look back' provision, the administration will update the City Commission via LTC
on the collection of fees and how fees are proposed to be spent by area. This will be done
yearly, at the start of the new fiscal year beginning in October 2020.
Finally, the City Commission did not need to approve the companion comprehensive plan
amendment for the mobility fee on September 11, 2019. Instead, the proposed comprehensive
plan amendment was opened and continued to the October 16, 2019 meeting, pending the
Page 1383 of 2557
review of the evaluation and appraisal review (EAR) amendments by state agencies, which are
expected to be complete by early October. On July 31, 2019, the City Commission approved
the EAR amendments to the comprehensive plan at first reading; due to issues with timing, the
modifications authorizing the mobility fee were incorporated into that amendment. As such,
should the EAR amendments be adopted as scheduled at the October 16, 2019 meeting, the
administration will be recommending that the companion comprehensive plan amendment be
withdrawn.
CONCLUSION
The administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the subject ordinance.
Applicable Area
Citywide
Is this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O.
Know item? Bond Funds?
Yes No
Legislative Tracking
Planning
Sponsor
Commissioner John Elizabeth Aleman
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
❑ Attachment A- Mobility Fee Presentation
❑ Attachment B - Miami Beach Mobility Fee Technical Analysis
❑ Attachment C - Impact Fee Comparison
❑ Attachment D - Cost Per Trip Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Page 1384 of 2557
Attachment A
mobility Fee
mi AM I B EAC H
Page 1385 of 2557
111111111.
_ - -
General Mobility Fee and Plan Elements
• Authorized Florida House Bill 319 — "Community Planning Act"
• Replace Transportation Concurrency and Concurrency Fees.
• Review Existing Multi-Modal Criteria.
• Review Adopted 2016 Transportation Master Plan
• Evaluate future traffic demands based on land uses or travel
demand model.
• Identify planned Multi-Modal Projects with cost.
• Calculate land use impact.
• Calculate Mobility Fee Rate.
• Create Mobility Fee as a one-time "pay & go" mitigation strategy.
Nage 1386 of 2557
2
.. ...
Municipalities with MobilityFees
• CITIES
1 Altamonte Springs Mabolny Fee Q //��//��
2 Soca Raton Punned Mobaity 00
Developments
3 Destro Mult!rnodol
Transportation D,srnct(MMTD) 0
4 Gaines,Ale Transportation
Mobility Program'
5 Jacksonville Mob&Ty Fee Q�
6 Actual vale Beach Mobdrty Fee COUNTIES O
7 Nlss!mmee Mobility Fee' m
17 Alachua County Muth 20 Nassau County oe
B Ma!tldnd Mobrkty Fte' Modal Transportation Mob+',t,Fee'
9 Morn Lakes Mobility Fee MA!gat!on 21 Osceola County
10 Orlando Mulitmodd 18 &owold County Mal�t,ty fee' m
Transportot!on Impact Fee Transporrotwn Z2 Pvsca County
Concarrency
11 Ormond Beach Mobdlty Fee Assessment Mu!hmbdal MOD!Iny
Fee'
12 Panama Cory Mobdoty Fee 19 millsborougn County
Mo l t'v Fee 23 Sarasota County
13 Plant C!ty Transportation Mab,hty Fee•
Mobility fee' 0
14 Sat[mato MUlTunodal Fee
15 Tampa Multimodal Impact Fe! ''t'J c:'c,,!101: �•�.;.•,r;•;i1g t7?1:='r.w_
tl,l'`. !n(r`t�Cr':-rya P.at Iv' ...
16 Tarpon Springs MMTD D_.p:.rtr..ant,•e.a^:m,c Dbpa,it;noi(4+;:c15!
Miami-Dade County is issuing a solicit p{lipf csultants tc undertake a Mobility Fee Study this year.
t-t r ,
. L ,
General Mobility Fee Benefits
• Eliminate Concurrency Fees & Uncertainty in Calculation
• Proposal relates fee to BTR Categories for Transparency
• One-Time Transparent Mitigation Strategy
• Proposed Unified Fee District for Increased Flexibility
• Allows for Funds to be spent on:
• Sidewalks & Trails
• Bike Lanes
• Transit Capital
• Roadway Improvements
• Anticipated to cover 13.5% of Priority I, II, and III Projects in
Transportation Master Plan Projects ($121,795,400)
• Goes hand-in-hand with providing mobility in-light of reduced
parking requirements and single-occupancy vehicle use.
Page 1388 of 2557
Current Concurrency Fee
• Concurrency Fee is based on Trips generated by new development or
change of use.
• Credit is provided for Trips generated by previous use
• Fee is based on the City of Miami Beach 1999 Municipal Mobility
Plan
• If Mobility Fee is not updated, the Concurrency Fee must be updated since
the 1999 Plan has been replaced by the 2016 Transportation Master Plan.
• Set by the City Commission on April 12, 2000 (Resolution No. 2000-
23874)
• North Beach - $1,841.54 / Trip
• Middle Beach - $2,783.30/ Trip
• South Beach - $2,015.16/ Trip
• Contains NO Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustment
• Trips are calculated pursuant to the Institute of Traffic Engineers — Trip
Generation Handbook.
Page 1389 of 2557
•
__ _ ,
. .
._. _
_____„. - ---------,.., ________
Proposed MFee
Nobility Fee Schedule UniceI Retail r Non.Residari6al
Ula.T Unit of shears MobdHy Fee
Category/Land ype _ ___ __ 1 _ Retail Sales 1 Personal and Business Services' 1 Per sq.ft. $10.11
RA NI ! Pharmacy'Onpeneary i Pan Management Clinic i Per sq.ft. $15.40
Single Family kiss hen 3.500 q.R or d Boarea �� Per Una i $t.647 Su pen,erket ' Per q.R. $1637
i
Single Family tamer 3.500 and 7,000 sq.R of lbor area I Per Una ' $2,461 'recut Restaurant with no seating'' $11.07
Per eq.ft
Singes rn
Fty greeter than 7of 000 sq.11. floor area 1 Par Una : 53.076 Restaurant ane seating Per___
-Seal i $677
Mute Ferrety Apnns I Par Una !
Auww51.515 Restorer drne-trus Pt.drive-hu . $9.110
Afloroace!Workforce Hou Aerio Per Una I. $759 Bar t
Housing Aparbrrertta Night CMrD/Pub*rout food servos' Per sq.ft. $26 12
Reawanon&Entertainment Ti I 8 Mad
rattle 6 Boat Setea r Seneca r Roger!eCleaning/Parts Par sq.ft. t $8.26
Manna(Indu0eg dry storage) Per Bek $30st I Lodging' I Per Roam 51.721
$1.721
Course Goff Coe Per Hole 53.681 Converting Retail' Per sq.ft I $1918
Mone Theater Pet Sween 522,623 Molar Vehide Fueling Per Fuel Poaalae $6,413
Outdoor Commercial Recreation' Per Ace $1,829 F Per drive Orin lens
iBonk Dnve'Thru Lane.Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive•Tfru Leu 612,170
Creamery Center!Civic/Gentry 7 Lodge 1 Museum Per q ft I $1.66 and tor Per ATMI 'Fra ail. rad or Baud ansa coaled arta and mil d.Mmired
MtkOr Commercial Recreation/Health Club I Frownj Per sq ft I $4.51
bby burn;oecer b a NOM*.
karil IlMOalal i 'TM so a a a:r aulene♦a 4411•0•11real nal r o. ha weareaala0ae taha
I I I Aaaap kin am.wncia ad Melena and reale swap ansa r$Mutat le sc a
Co kin ang Cara Foamy:Nursing Horne/Memory Care/Congregate.
Care Peary/Assisted r independent Laing Per Bed 5740 a Ma. tw
••u0w% swing.dmpleWrap rap arc carr nus oil mb m.saC sc a
P4411111Sarlodl(Pr�n-12) ' Per sq.It 11 $2.09 'tare rr •••=m1•4rm a
e ••• a m ors Yarwu ru
VW oo. s,laa. a nw
s .r
Plana of Warship.including andlery b accessory bearingsI Par sq.ft. Si.76 r Reaeurent.Bari Mr.yr CSA arta tar sow re w nal 44,11••••b sow pail Cr*.4411 r o
eakhriad based on the/ roan*sOdCeMe LIU Ur 0=44:Mal
Day Care Center Per sq.ft. $3.57 'Cp-. erg alert min a wale from the war for*ankle twine Krone Arr per rade earhre p••a. '
Industrial apply bps Maban
e• d service nylons wen peps kW pes TM M a arra resrawawn a't sIodise.vamp a Oel
r •Warr cl•
rennet or Alpe ilea b.Wad on the r4wArr M aI for era lend 6..rot M ow...o ace Ware ran
Wpreleousi g I MarrdKnxig I Induseul/Prcductwn(under roof) Per q.IL 51.53 eye dyyq quare bora;his under clap rad is an a0der lee beyond ea M due la ewt!ATN drM-14/4 yeas a free
Mn:Warahow y Boat r RVa&Other Outdoor SirX ' Per sq.ft $0.45 ebrdre ATM.T reps rates re.w ar.Frhn/Ira a lte tank en0 per(err,lace wth an ATM.Tee free strong ATM Is
egVan Arm only and ro'on ATM*Ow a pee or snorts cOn4.1 roar bverrrg ran as an ATM wean a t'ans'y etre
Dsttbubon/Funke llant Canter/Package Ornery Hub Per sq.ft $2.14
• J
Ora 1
General Ora I Reread+I H. t r Ed cellon I Firenoat I Bank , Per gage"390=5 2557
Medical i Dental r Clinic/Veterinary I Hospital Per q ft. i $7.60
, .
. ______
.,....________
_ ________
Concurrency Fee vs . Mobility Fee
Comparison of Like Uses
Current Transportation Concurrency Fees(Set in 2001)
Average IF CPI
increase had
been applied Proposed
Use Units South Beach Mid Beach North Beach Average since 2001 Mobility Fee
Single Family Homes<3,500 SF Unit $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,847.00
Single Family Homes>3,000 SF<7,000 SF Unit $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,461.00
Single Family Homes>7,000 SF Unit $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,076.00
Multifamily Residential Unit $ 864,86 $ 1,193.91 $ 789.79 $ 949.52 $ 1,314.10 $ 1,515.00
Hotel Room $ 820.51 $ 1,132.68 $ 749.29 $ 900.83 $ 1,246.71 $ 1,721.00
Restaurant Seats $ 454.61 $ 627.57 $ 415.15 $ 499.11 $ 690.75 $ 877.00
Retail SF $ 5.57 $ 7.68 $ 5.08 $ 6.11 $ 8.46 $ 10.11
General Office SF $ 1.65 $ 2.28 $ 1.51 $ 1.81 $ 2.51 $ 3.33
Medical Office SF $ 4.73 $ 6.54 $ 4.32 $ 5.20 $ 7.19 $ 7.60
Storage Warehouse SF $ 0.32 $ 0.44 $ 0.29 $ 0.35 $ 0.48 $ 0.46
Supermarket SF $ 9.28 $ 12.81 $ 8.48 $ 10.19 $ 14.10 $ 15.69
Bar SF $ 17.18 $ 23.71 $ 15.68 $ 18.86 $ 26.10 $ 26.12
College SF $ 2.93 $ 4.04 $ 2.67 $ 3.-)1 $ 4.45 $ 3.33
Health Club SF $ 4.50 $ 6.21 $ 4.11 $ 4.94 $ 6.84 $ 5.54
Day Care SF $ 15.25 $ 21.05 $ 13.92 $ 16.74 $ 23.17 $ 3.87
ALF Bed $ 410.26 $ 566.34 $ 374.64 $ 450.41 $ 623.36 $ 740.00
Gas Station Pump $ 16,099.78 $ 22,225.04 $ 14,702.23 $ 17,675.68 $ 24,462.51 $ 6,413.00
Synagogue SF $ 1.87 $ 2.59 $ 1.71 $ 2.06 $ 2.85 $ 1.78
Museum SF page 1391 #2N6,$ 0.28 $ 0.18 $ 0.22 $ 0.30 $ 1.86
Auto Care SF $ 3.89 $ 5.37 $ 3.55 $ 4.27 $ 5.91 $ 6.26
Sample Calculation
• 5,383 SF of Retail to 218 Seat Restaurant on 41 Street
• Current Concurrency Fee:
New Use: 218 Seat Restaurant @ 0.41 PH Trips/Seat = 89.38 PH Trips
Current Use: 5,383 SF Retail @ 5.02 PH Trips/1,000 SF = 27.02 PH Trips
Additional Trips: 89.38 PH Trips —27.02 PH Trips = 62.36 PH Trips
• Reduction for Proximity to Transit = 15%
• Reduction for Pass-By Trips = 30%
• Total Reduction =45%
• Net New PH Trips Generated = 34.30 PH Trips
Total Fee: 34.30 PH Trips x$2,783/Trip = $95,447.26
• Total Fee IF there were CPI Adjustments: $95,447.26 +38.40% (CPI since 2001) = $132,095.56
• Proposed Mobi! ty Fee:
New Use: 218 Seat Restaurant @ $877/Seat = $191,186.00
Existing Use: 5,383 SF Retail @ $9.69/SF = $54,422.13
• Total Fee: $183,338.00- $52,161.27=$136,763.87
Page 1392 of 2557
_ _
____
North Beach Examples
Existing Use Existing Use/
Restaurant /Credit Proposed Units Mixed use Credit Proposed Units
Retail in SF 1,087 - Retail in SF 2,600 1165
Restaurant Seats 16 30 Restaurant Seats - 30
Mobility Fee $1,288.43 %Increase
Current fee $286.81 349% Mobility Fee $11,802.15 % Increase
Current fee $5,160.26 129%
Current fee W/CPI $408.23 216% Current fee W/ CPI $7,344.83 61%
Existing Use Hypothetical Mixed Existing Use /
Condo Building /Credit Proposed Units Use Building Credit Proposed Units
-
Residential 3 16 Hotel 27
Mobility Fee $19,695.00 % Increase Residential - 188
Current feP $10,267.26 92% Office 13,000 14,676
Current fee W/CPI $14,613.85 35%
Retail in SF 2,000 26,690
Restaurant Seats 215 -
The Median increase from the current Mobility Fee $338,294.98 % Increase
fee with CPI adjustment is 61% Page 1393 of 2557 Current fee $148,102.87 128%
Current fee W/CPI $210,801.47 60%
.. . ....
,LI‘ , - ------„,________
Middle Beach Examples
Existing Use Existing Use
Restaurant /Credit Proposed Units Mixed Use / Credit Proposed Units
Restaurant Seats 100 140 Retail in SF - 436
Mobility Fee $35,080.00 %Increase Office in SF 436 -
Current fee $25,102.66 40% Mobility Fee $2,956.08 %Increase
Current fee W/CPI $35,729.74 -2% Current fee $2,355.79 25%
Current fee W/CPI $3,353.10 -12%
Existing Use Hypothetical
Mixed Use /Credit Proposed Units Building Credit Units Proposed Units
Retail in SF 35,619 31,765 Retail in SF 35,619 31,765
Restaurant Seats 60 Restaurant Seats - 60
Mobility Fee $13,656.06 % Increase
Mobility Fee $7^.,235.00 % Increase
Current fee $8,040.80 70%
Current fee W/CPI $11,444.23 19% Current fee $58,501.44 27%
Current fee W/CPI $83,267.73 -11%
The Median change from the current fee with CPI adjustment is -6%
Page 1394 of 2557
. ._
____
South Beach Examples
Existing Use Mixed use Condo Existing Use
Hotel w/ Restaurant /Credit Proposed Units Building /Credit Proposed Units
Hotel 35 44 Residential - 10
Restaurant Seats 40 54 Office in SF -
10,375
Mobility Fee $27,767.00 %Increase Retail in SF - 10,234
Current fee $11,249.28 147% Mobility Fee $153,164.49 % Increase
Current fee W/CPI $16,011.61 73% Current fee $67,707.45 126%
Current fee W/CPI $96,371.06 59%
Existing Use Hypothetical Mixed Existing Use/
Mixed use Hotel /Credit Proposed Units Use Building Credit Proposed Units
Hotel - 267 Hotel 27 -
Residential - 188
Retail in SF 35,387 45,053 Office 13,000 24,676
Restaurant Seats 374 339
Mobility Fee $526,535.26 % Increase Retail in SF 2,000 26,690
-
Current fee $137,860.87 282% Restaurant Seats 215
Current fee W/CPI $196,223.57 168% Mobility Fee $338,294.98 % Increase
Current fee $162,181.09 109%
Current fee W/CPI $230,839.64 47%
The Median increase from the current fee
with CPI adjustment is 66% Page 1395 of 2557
• • .
Works with Parking Reductions
• Hypothetical North Beach Project
• 188 Residential Units @ 550 SF
• 24,676 SF of Retail
• 26,690 SF of Office
• Estimated cost of building parking is $40,000/space
• Previous North Beach Parking District 4
• 373 Spaces Required
• Estimated cost to develop $14,920,000
• New North Beach Parking District 8 (per TC-C Regulations)
• 94 Spaces Required
• Estimated cost to develop $3,760,000
• Savings with new reductions is estimated at $11,160,000
Page 1396 of 2557
Incentives
Phase-in North Beach fee 50%, 75%, 100%
• Follow schedule for TC-C Public Benefits
Page 1397 of 2557
Attachment B
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
MOBILITY FEE
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
(• •
t., ;
•., .
. v; • i•gt 3
Prepared for the City of Miami Beach
By
Keith & Schnars
NUE Urban Concepts
August 2018
Page 1398 of 2557
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
LIST OF TABLES 3
LIST OF FIGURES 4
SECTION 1 - BACKGROUND 5
Mobility Fee Legislative Overview 5
Mobility Fee Legal Basis 7
Mobility Fee Basis 8
Mobility Fee Technical Analysis 9
SECTION 2 - ESTABLISHMENT OF MOBILITY FEE DISTRICTS 10
Assessment Areas 10
Benefit Districts 10
SECTION 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS & LAND USES 12
Miami Beach Transportation Characteristics 12
Mobility Fee Land Uses 12
SECTION 4 - APPROACH TO MOBILITY FEE 14
Mobility Fee Approach 14
Mobility Fee 15
SECTION 5 - TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 16
Technical Analysis 16
Mobility Fee Per Additional Person - Mile of Travel 18
Trip Generation 18
Percent of New Trips 19
Person Trips 19
Mode Share 20
Person Miles of Travel (PMT) 20
SECTION 6 - Comprehensive Plan & LDR Review 27
Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulation Review 27
Comprehensive Plan 27
Land Development Regulations 27
Parking Reduction Strategies 28
ATTACHMENTS 29
Page 1399 of 2557
LIST OF TABLES
Table page
Table 1 - Daily VMT for 2010 & 2040 from SERPM 7 22
Table 2 - Residential Growth 23
Table 3 - Employment Growth 24
Table 4 - Hotel Growth 25
Table 5 - VMT & PMT & Mobility Fee Cost Per PMT 26
3
Page 1400 of 2557
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page
Figure 1 - Existing Citywide Mode Share 8
Figure 2 - 2035 Mode Share Vision 9
Figure 3 - Mobility Fee Analysis Process for Miami Beach 21
4
Page 1401 of 2557
SECTION 1 - BACKGROUND
Mobility Fee Legislative Overview
The State of Florida passed the Growth Management Act of 1985 that required all local
governments in Florida to adopt Comprehensive Plans to guide future development.
The Act mandated that adequate public facilities must be provided "concurrent" with the
impacts of new development. State mandated "concurrency" was adopted to ensure the
health, safety and general welfare of the public. The introduction of "transportation
concurrency" focused on accommodating the travel demand from new development by
adding roadway capacity through construction of new roads and the widening of existing
roads. Transportation concurrency, while well intended, had the unintended
consequence of driving development away from urban areas, where road capacity was
unavailable or cost prohibitive to provide, to suburban and rural areas where road
capacity was readily available or cheaper to construct.
In the late 1990's, as the negative impacts of transportation concurrency became more
apparent, the Florida Legislature adopted statutes to provide urban areas with alternative
means to address the impact of new development with the introduction of Transportation
Concurrency Exception Areas (TCEA) whereby local governments could identify
alternative solutions to provide mobility. In the mid 2000's, Florida experienced
phenomenal growth that strained local governments' ability to provide the necessary
roadway infrastructure. Many communities across the State started to deny new
developments or require those developments to make substantial transportation
improvements to meet concurrency. Between 2005 and 2009 the Legislature enacted
several laws related to proportionate share that allowed new development to mitigate its
share of road capacity improvements and prohibited local governments from charging
new development for over capacity "backlogged" roads.
In 2009, the Legislature declared Dense Urban Land Areas (DULA), communities with a
population greater than 1,000 persons per square mile, as TCEA's and it also introduced
5
Page 1402 of 2557
the ideas of mobility fees as an alternative to concurrency, proportionate share and road
impact fees. The Legislature during the 2011 session repealed state mandated
transportation concurrency and enacted further restrictions on local governments to
implement transportation concurrency, calculate proportionate share and address over
capacity roadways.
House Bill 319, otherwise known as the "Community Planning Act," was adopted by the
Florida Legislature is 2013, and among many other changes, established mobility fees,
based on an adopted transportation mobility plan, as an alternative means by which local
governments may allow development consistent with an adopted Comprehensive Plan to
equitably mitigate its transportation impact. The intent of mobility fees is to eliminate
transportation concurrency, proportionate share and impact fees and enact a streamlined,
simplified mitigation mechanism whereby a development can mitigate its impact through
a one-time payment.
The Community Planning Act provides the following guidance for local governments that
elect to repeal transportation concurrency and adopt an alternative mobility funding
system using one or more of the tools and techniques identified in Florida Statutes
163.3180(5)(f) such as:
1. Adoption of long-term strategies to facilitate development patterns that support
multimodal solutions, including urban design, appropriate land use mixes,
inten,:,,fy and density.
2. Adoption of an area wide level of service not dependent on any single road
segment function.
3. Exempting or discounting impacts of locally desired development.
4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to ensuring
a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment with convenient
interconnection to transit.
5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on non-
vehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community design
will provide adequate a level of mobility.
6
Page 1403 of 2557
6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within urban
areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use
development in certain areas or districts, or for affordable or workforce housing.
Mobility Fee Legal Basis
The Florida Legislature has elected to largely defer to established case law to guide the
development and implementation of impact fees and mobility fees. The Community
Planning Act provides the following guidance to local governments considering an
alternative to transportation concurrency through Florida Statute 163.3180 (5) (i), which
states:
"If a local government elects to repeal transportation concurrency, it is encouraged to
adopt an alternative mobility funding system that uses one or more of the tools and
techniques identified in paragraph (f). Any alternative mobility funding system adopted
may not be used to deny, time, or phase an application for site plan approval, plat
approval, final subdivision approval, building permits, or the functional equivalent of such
approvals provided that the developer agrees to pay for the development's identified
transportation impacts via the funding mechanism implemented by the local government.
The revenue from the funding mechanism used in the alternative system must be used
to implement the needs of the local government's plan which serves as the basis for the
fee imposed. A mobility fee-based funding system must comply with the dual rational
nexus test applicable to impact fees. ^.: alternative system that is not mobility fee-based
shall not be applied in a manner that imposes upon new development any responsibility
for funding an existing transportation deficiency as defined in paragraph (h)."
The "dual rational nexus test" is a legal precedent established by the Supreme Court in
the Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and the Dolan v. Tigard cases that
establishes a two-prong test required of any fee or exaction by local government:
"Needs Prong:" That a rational nexus exists between an increase in demand from new
development and the need for improvements; and
7
Page 1404 of 2557
"Benefits Prong:" That a rational nexus exists between the payment of fees by new
development and the benefit that new development receives from the expenditure of
those fees.
In addition to the "dual rational nexus test", the U.S. Supreme Court in Dolan v. Tigard
also established a "rough proportionality" test to address the relationship between the
amount of a fee imposed on a new development and the impact of the new development.
The "rough proportionality" test requires that there be a reasonable relationship between
the fee and the impact of new development based upon the applicable unit of measure
for residential and non-residential uses and that the variables used to calculate a fee are
reasonably assignable and attributable to the impact of each new development.
Mobility Fee Basis
The Legislature has required that a mobility fee be based upon an adopted transportation
mobility plan. The City of Miami Beach has adopted a Transportation Master Plan that
serves as the basis for development of the mobility fee and identifies a prioritized list of
multimodal improvements. The Master Plan provides an analysis of existing traffic
conditions and travel characteristics. Figure 1 illustrates the existing Citywide mode
share.
Figure 1 - Existing Citywide Mode Share
56.5H
12 14LL 5.5c
PRIVATE TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN BIKE OTHER
VEHICLES
Source: City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan(P. 76)
8
Page 1405 of 2557
The City has established a Citywide mode share goal that seeks to reduce travel by motor
vehicle and increase the share of travel made by riding transit, walking and riding a
bicycle. The list of multimodal improvements established in the Transportation Master
Plan are intended to address future citywide travel demand and achieve the Citywide
mode share goals, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2 - 2035 Mode Share Vision
43�
2C 1T 8� 12
PRIVATE TRANSIT WALKING BIKING OTHER
VEHICLES
Source: City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan (P. 76)
Mobility Fee Technical Analysis
Mobility fees provide a greater flexibility in funding multimodal projects and supportive
infrastructure compared to road impact fees. They are also better suited to achieve the
City's adopted transportation objectives. This memorandum describes the technical
approach developed specifically for Miami Bedch to evaluate projected growth in trips
related to future projects and the procedure to relate increased trips with programmed
improvements to estimate the mobility fee per person-mile of travel. The analysis steps
and results are documented in this memorandum. The calculated mobility fee or cost
per person-mile of travel provides the basis for developing mobility fee schedules for
future projects based on their land use, trip generation, trip purpose, trip internalization,
trip length and travel modes characteristics.
9
Page 1406 of 2557
SECTION 2 - ESTABLISHMENT OF MOBILITY FEE DISTRICTS
Assessment Areas
The City's current transportation concurrency system divides the City into three different
assessment areas with varying transportation mitigation rates. The three assessment
areas include: (1) South Beach, (2) Mid Beach, and (3) North Beach. Assessment areas
recognize differences in travel demand characteristics and the need for transportation
mobility improvements. The current transportation concurrency system charges the
highest rates in Mid Beach, followed by lower rates in South Beach and the lowest rates
in North Beach. Keeping the three assessment areas was evaluated in the development
of the mobility fee, as was establishing varying fees for mixed-use development. Since
the basis for the mobility fee is the Citywide Transportation Master Plan and the Master
Plan is based on achieving a Citywide mode share goal, it was determined that the best
approach was to have a uniform Citywide assessment area. Further, the Future Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan seeks to encourage a mixture of multi-modal
supportive land uses Citywide. Thus, it was also determined that there would not be
separate assessment areas based upon a type of development pattern such as mixed-
use or transit oriented development as the entire city seeks to feature mixed-use at
densities and intensities that support transit, walking and bicycling. The mobility fee per
each land use in the mobility fee schedule will be assessed uniformly to new development
and redevelopment which results in an increase in travel demand over the existing use.
Benefit Districts
The City's current transportation concurrency system divides the City into three benefit
districts whereby mitigation payments to the City must be spent to construct
improvements within the district in which they were collected. The three benefit districts
include: (1) South Beach, (2) Mid Beach, and (3) North Beach. The Florida Supreme
Court found in the case of Contractors and Builders Association of Pinellas County v. City
of Dunedin that local governments are required to keep separate accounts for the
10
Page 1407 of 2557
collection of any exaction or fee and to earmark those funds specifically for expenditure
on improvements that served as the basis of the exaction or fee.
Establishment of a benefit district meets the second prong of the dual rational nexus
test. Keeping three separate benefit districts was evaluated in the development of the
mobility fee. Like the findings with assessment areas, since the basis for the mobility fee
is the Citywide Transportation Master Plan and the Master Plan is based on achieving a
Citywide mode share goal, it was determined that the best approach was to have a single
Citywide benefit district.
In the evaluation of trip lengths and model travel demand data, it was found that
residents and business travel throughout the City of Miami Beach, regardless of whether
they live in North, South or Mid Beach. To ensure that adequate revenues are available
to construct multimodal improvements, it was determined that a single Citywide benefit
district should be established.
11
Page 1408 of 2557
SECTION 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS & LAND USES
Miami Beach Transportation Characteristics
Transportation mobility in the City of Miami Beach has unique characteristics compared to
other cities in Florida. Travel in Miami Beach is characterized by a high percent of tourists,
shorter trips, convenient public transportation and taxi/Uber/Lyft system, greater reliance
on bike and walking modes, availability of a bike sharing program and limited free public
parking that promotes alternative modes of travel. Furthermore, City policies regarding
prioritizing non-vehicular modes, creating pedestrian priority zones, and investing in
greenways and protected bike lanes help further reduce the reliance on the private vehicle
for short trips.
Mobility Fee Land Uses
An extensive review of the Future Land Use Element, existing land development patterns
and the City's business tax categories was undertaken to develop three (3) alternative
mobility fee schedules for review by City Staff. After several iterations, a final land use
schedule was established that best meets the needs of the City. The categories for single
family (attached and detached) dwellings divided into thresholds based upon square
footage and projected vehicle ownership rates. Establishing thresholds allows for
establishing lower fees for smaller square foot residence to address affordability issues;;
with the travel impact and the mobility fee increasing as the square footage thresholds
increases. Multi family was separated into two land uses: (1) market rate, and (2)
affordable / workforce / micro apartments. Recreation and institutional land uses were
established based upon the most common land use per category. Office uses have been
streamlined into a single category with the same per square foot rate, regardless of the
size of the development as office uses provide employment opportunities. Medical and
dental offices, hospitals and walk-in clinics have been consolidated into a signal category to
ease implementation and encourage employment based uses. Industrial uses have been
consolidated to ease implementation, except for e-commerce distribution centers and mini-
storage which have separate mobility fees rates to reflect their unique trip generation
characteristics.
12
Page 1409 of 2557
Retail, personal service and restaurant uses have been established to reflect unique travel
demand impacts. In addition, the higher travel demand generating components of certain
land uses such as bank drive-thru lanes, gas pumps and drive-thru lanes for fast food
restaurants have been separated into their own land use category. Thus, a bank without
drive-thru lanes or a drive-thru ATM would just be charged a mobility fee based on the
office rate. A convenience store without gas pumps would just pay the mobility fee rate per
the square footage of the convenience store. All restaurants will pay per seat. In addition,
any restaurant that has a drive thru lane will also pay a separate mobility fee per drive-thru
lane. The mobility fee was designed to reflect the travel demand impact from each
development. To assist with implementation of the mobility fee, a crosswalk table has been
developed based upon the City's business tax categories (Attachment A). The crosswalk
table includes the applicable mobility fee land use for each category. The mobility fee
ordinance will also include definitions for each land use on the mobility fee schedule.
13
Page 1410 of 2557
SECTION 4 - APPROACH TO MOBILITY FEE
Mobility Fee Approach
The traditional mobility fee analysis is heavily tilted towards the trips made by private
cars as they typically represent over 95% of the total trips. Non-vehicular trips for most
cities in Florida represent a small percentage of the overall trips. At the core of the
traditional procedure is the growth in vehicular trips obtained from the transportation
regional model compared to the additional capacity gained by programmed
transportation improvements. This traditional procedure is not applicable to Miami
Beach because the regional transportation model (SERPM) shows a very small rate of
increase in vehicle-mile traveled over the next 20 years, at less than a third of the
projected growth rate of residential and employment developments. Therefore, the use
of vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) does not reflect the amount of growth anticipated in the
City. This is due to the unique characteristics of Miami Beach mentioned above coupled
with a well-developed transit system and a proactive City policy to increase the modal
share of bike and walk modes from 15% to 27% as well as enhancing transit including
planning a new trolley route. Whereas the increase in highway capacity is easily
calculated, the increase in person-mile capacity gained by improving bike and walk
modes is more difficult to estimate in order to create a direct correlation between cost
and benefit.
For these reasons, a mobility fee procedure specific to Miami Beach was developed
consisting of a direct comparison of the trips generated by new developments (using
City specific data) to the unfunded cost of planned transportation improvements. The
projected Ilew developments for residential, employrI lent and hotels were obtained from
the ZDATA files of the MPO's adopted regional transportation model (SERPM). The
land use categories were developed in coordination with City staff to maintain
consistency with previous fee schedules while incorporating new land use categories
approved by City officials. The trip generation is based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation documents in addition to other sources
14
Page 1411 of 2557
from previous studies. The trip lengths per trip purpose were derived from the National
Household Travel Survey (NHTS) database and analyzing all the individual survey
records specific to Miami Beach (special access to the data was granted to conduct this
analysis). The multimodal transportation improvements and their associated costs were
obtained from the Priority 1, 2 and 3 transportation improvement lists provided in the
City's Transportation Master Plan. The percent of unfunded cost was estimated for
each programmed project in coordination with City staff considering the type of project,
facility type and overall cost.
Mobility Fee
The calculation of the mobility fee requires the adjustment of the PMT per land use by the
origin and destination adjustment factor. The factor is equal to .5 and ensures that new
development is only paying for its trips and not being double counted. The PMT per land
use begins with the entering and exiting daily trips for each land use. The adjusted PMT
is then multiplied by the PMT rate of$129.37 to determine the mobility fee rate per each
land use on the mobility fee schedule (Attachment J). The formulas for each step in the
calculation of the mobility fee have been documented for inclusion in the mobility fee
ordinance (Attachment K).
15 •
Page 1412 of 2557
SECTION 5 - TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
The mobility fee analysis procedure specific to Miami Beach is illustrated in Figure 3.
The technical analysis tasks performed for this project are the following:
1. Estimating Growth in Traffic, Residential and Employment: projected growth in
traffic volumes, residential units, employment and hotel rooms were obtained from the
MPO's adopted SERPM regional transportation model. The projected increase in total
traffic volumes on major roads within the City of Miami Beach between 2018 and
2035 is 5.5% over 17 years which is equivalent to 0.32% annual growth as shown in
Table 1. In comparison, the projected increase in residential units over the same
period is 17% or 0.92% per year as depicted in Table 2. For employments, the
projected increase in residential units over the same period is even greater at 19% or
1.05% per year as depicted in Table 3. Table 4 shows the projected increase in hotel
rooms over the same period at 7% or 0.41% per year. Considering projected traffic
growth rate obtained from the regional model is significantly less than the projected
growth rate for residential and employment land uses, it was determined that traffic
growth resulting from new projects should not be based on the regional model but
directly calculated from the new projects' trip generation, trip length and modal split
characteristics. This approach also better account for non-vehicular trips such as
biking and waking.
2. Estimating Trips Generated by New Projects: The trips generated by residential,
employment and hotels were estimated using the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) 9th Edition "Trip Generation". The Residential trip rate was calculated
at 7.33 trips per unit as an average of land uses 210 (Single Family), 220 (Apartment)
and 230 (Condominium/Townhouse). The Employment trip rate was calculated at
15.08 trips per employee by averaging trip rates of land uses 710 (General Office,
720 (Medical-Dental Office), 730 (Government Office), 815 (Discount store) and 826
(Specialty Retail). The Hotel trip rate was calculated at 10.27 trips per room as an
16
Page 1413 of 2557
average for land uses 310 (Hotel) and 330 (Resort Hotel). The total trips generated by
new Residential, Employment and Hotel land uses are provided in Tables 2, 3 and 4;
respectively. A 15% internalization rate was applied when combining trips all uses
considering it includes both production and attraction land uses.
3. Converting New Trips to Person-Miles of Travel (PMT): converting new trips to
person-miles of travel requires two steps. First, vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) are
estimated using the average trip length per travel mode, and second, PMT are
calculated using the average vehicle occupancy for each travel mode. The average
trip length was developed specific to Miami Beach using the National Household
Travel Survey (NHTS) database and extracting the records where trip origins and/or
destinations are within the City of Miami Beach. A special access to the individual
survey forms was granted for this project. The trip length summaries based on the
NHTS records are provided in Attachment L. The modal share of various travel
modes is based on the City of Miami Beach's Transportation and Bike/Pedestrian
Master Plans; and consists of 43% cars, 20% transit, 8% bike, 17% walk, and 12%
others (Uber/Lift/etc.) The VMT was converted to person-miles traveled (PMT) using
a vehicle occupancy factor (VOC) specific to Miami Beach calculated as a weighted
average VOC of various trip purposes and travel modes. The total VMT and PMT
calculations are provided in Table 5. The total PMT after internalization is 980,737
person-miles.
4. Estimating Mobility Fee Share of Transportation Budget: The cost share of
transportation improvements attributed to the mobility fee was calculated by
estimating for each planned project the percent of cost that is not funded by federal,
state, county or developer funds. The planned projects are grouped into Categories I,
II and Ill and are provided in Attachment M. The total cost of the planned projects is
$902,092,181 and the Mobility Fee share is $126,878,500 or approximately 14.1% of
the total cost.
17
Page 1414 of 2557
5. Estimating Cost per Additional Person-Mile of Travel (PMT): The unit cost per
person-mile of travel (PMT) was estimated by dividing the mobility fee share of the
improvement costs by the total increase in PMT.
6. Developing Mobility Fee Schedule: After land use categories were established in
coordination with City staff, a mobility fee for each land use category was calculated
considering the net external trips based on ITE Trip Generation rates (or rates from
other relevant studies), the average trip length per trip purpose derived from the
NHTS database specific to Miami Beach, and the travel modes (modal split) and
vehicle occupancy rates obtained from the Miami Beach Transportation Plan. This
part of the analysis was performed by NUE Urban Concepts and is documented in a
separate report.
Mobility Fee Per Additional Person - Mile of Travel
The analysis results show a 'mobility fee' cost of $129.37 per additional person-mile of
travel. This unit cost is used in developing the mobility fee schedule for new projects in
coordination with City staff.
Trip Generation
The mobility fee is required to be roughly proportional to the impact of new development. To
determine impact, a person trip rate is developed for each land use included in the mobility
fee schedule. The Institute of Transpiration Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual — 10th
Edition was used to generate the trip generation rate for each land use. Since the mobility
fee land use schedule is designed to reflect the unique needs of the City, and not just
reproduce the ITE Trip Generation Manual, adjustments were needed to the trip generation
rates.
The trip generation rate for many of the land uses on the mobility fee schedule involved the
averaging of daily trip rates for multiple land uses based on the ITE trip generation rates.
Other land uses required further adjustments to the trip generation data to reflect unique
land uses that are not distinctly identified in the ITE trip generation manual. Some land uses
18
Page 1415 of 2557
required the conversion of peak hour trips to daily trips. The ITE Land Use codes for each
land use have been documented as well as any adjustments made to the trip generation rate
(Attachment B). The final trip generation rate used for each land use has been calculated
and included on a table, along with the percentage of new trips and the person miles of
travel factor (Attachment C).
Percent of New Trips
The ITE Trip Generation Handbook — 3rd edition was also evaluated to develop the
percentage of new trips, commonly referred to as pass-by trips. The ITE Handbook was
used as a guide. However, professional judgment and experience gained through
development review, creation of impact fee and mobility fee technical reports and
implementing ordinances and both the review of and development of over 2,000 traffic
impact analysis was also utilized to derive appropriate new trips percentages above and
beyond those provided in the ITE Handbook. For instance, the ITE Handbook does not
provide pass-by rates for any non-retail land uses. Experience has shown that except for
residential land uses and a limited number of non-residential land uses, most land uses have
some level of pass-by trips associated with travel demand impacts. The percentage of new
trips has been documented for each land use on the mobility fee schedule (Attachment C).
Person Trips
To convert vehicle trips to person trips requires the development of a conversion factor,
referred to as the Person Miles of Travel (PMT) Factor. The Transportation Master Plan
identifies a vehicle occupancy factor of 1.6 based on the 2009 National Household Travel
Survey (NHTS) for vehicle trips. The Master Plan establishes a 12% mode share goal for
other travel. For purposes of the mobility fee, other travel is considered "future mobility" to
address new services and technologies. The occupancy factor for "future mobility" was also
assumed to be 1.6. For transit, walking and bicycling travel, an occupancy factor of one (1)
was used. The occupancy factors were multiplied by the mode share goal to derive a PMT
factor of 1.33 (Attachment D). The calculation of person trips per land use is based on a
two-step process. The first step is to multiply the daily trip generation rate by the percentage
19
Page 1416 of 2557
of new trips. The second step is to multiply the adjusted trip generation rate by the person
miles of travel factor to derive the person trips (Attachment D).
Mode Share
To calculated mobility fee takes a unique approach to deriving a person miles of travel rate
per land use based upon the Citywide mode share goals. Most mobility fee calculations
convert vehicle miles of travel by multiplying vehicle trips by percentage of new trips and
average trip length to derive a Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT). The VMT is then multiplied by
a PMT factor calculated for the specific local government to derive a PMT rate per land use.
The City of Miami Beach's Mobility Fee is unique in that it is based on the Transportation
Master Plans Citywide mode share goals. The mode share goals for purposes of the mobility
fee calculation are as follows: (1) Vehicle: 43%, (2) Transit: 20%, (3) Walking: 17%, (4)
Bicycling: 8%, and (5) Future Mobility (aka other): 12%.
In order to derive a person trip by mode share, the person trip per land use was multiplied by
each of the five mode share goals (Attachment E). To derive a person mile of travel by
mode share required a multi-step process. The first step was to calculate a trip length for
residential land uses based on six trip purposes, multiplied by the percent of person trips
from the NHTS data (Attachment F). The second step required the establishment of trip
length by mode share for seven different trip purposes (Attachment G). The final step
involved the assignment of a trip purpose and a trip length by mode for each land use on the
mobility fee schedule (Attachment H).
Person Miles of Travel (PMT)
To calculate a PMT for each land use on the mobility fee schedule requires multiplying the
person trip by mode share by the trip length by mode share. The PMT for the land use is
derived by summing the PMT by mode share (Attachment I).
20
Page 1417 of 2557
Mobility Fee Analysis Process for Miami Beach
Travel Demand Growth Travel Demand (PMT) Growth in Personal
Increase in Travel from New Projects (VMT) ( ._ltvrArl:',r4.,l., JJII':
Travel Demand (PMT)
Demand (VMT) ,....4.1R.r;1,1-4.1•'a 1.:.-rv, :1 ,ISM, n1.1•.,.1;:nr1;10 t,q 1..,U',r, :
'me i b.f...-t0' SIIt it;I %d.,4 u.rf.- u•t.' .,;:.. ., ,. .,,.. Resulting from New
,• .. r......4. 1,1.- 11r,n.n•,, L.,
Sr, •r ..f.......C...I.Inl"..:c,,;...Ti.. , , f T.r,.e.;:.i,, .. ,I 11..1.•.. Projects T
L.., , • I I,LI:LG5.t:1 (a.
• Highway m
w
Highway Improvements Improvements
(thaw MI 11118 Ca diLlslurprolnts r Funding Sources Calculate
.„ n o
Highway and ,to,•
,'.'4e"'r'll'' `"'1 Total Cost for cs-
-
Multimodal Funded and
Improvements Multimodal Multirrtodallmprov.tu Unfunded m
uo Improvements Funding Sources m
m
lu,,,,N.,..,,r 3:..a.L s.of$740"0! (M WWII x1.11improve.t ..., Projects D
warily p•rlp.4 t.l 7
Ell
Co r. .-
oin
(.
N
cin Subtract Funded Cot
-.4
0
Tarv,et Caplt,ll total Capital Lost for & Divide by Inue.r.tr Lstinr,It1• 1os,t Per a)
rn
(urlding I evel (IC f I ) Highway & Multimodal 11 Travel Fvliles (PMT) Additional 1 PMT cn
=ion) New Projec tc. o
K
iv'
Land Use lowth 1 Trip Generation Per Adjust for Pass-by, Develop Mobility Fee co-
11-1.d>ri•.r,Lit,. .type,. Type of Land Use (ITE Internalization, and Per land Use Typeal
i U,0,...Iru
nr mit,mi. n.8✓.n 1.
Cat:;.40- '.,,r'.I..1,r:1.,;l•la.,,.t and other Sources) trip Length (NH IS) tcr•.r 0 (,,I„II •.r: ,r 1,-it. 0
LEGEND: ASSUMPTIONS:
VMT=Vehicle Miles of Travel Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan projects and increase in Bike and Walk trip
PMT= Person Miles of Travel modal splits from 5%and 10%currently to 10%and 17% in 2035, respectively.These I
NHTS= National Highway Travel Survey Projections were Incorporated into the mobility fee calculations.
Table 1 - Daily VMT for 2010 & 2040 from SERPM 7
2010 2010 2040 2040 VEHICLE MILE TRAVELED(VMT) 12014-2035 Annual
STREET ZONE FROM TO Volume Length Volume Length 2010 20182035 1 2000 %Grth Growth
W 63 Street N Alton Road La Gorce Drive 21,660 0.371 23,860 0.371 8,038 8,256.. ow
8,720 8,856 5.6% 0.32%
N La Gorce Drive Pine Tree Dr 26,760 0.059 31,480 0.059 1,590 1,664 1,823 1,869 9.5% 0.54%
N Pine Tree Dr Indian Creek Dr 28,320 0.260 34,730 0.260 7,366 7,810 8,754 9,031 12.1% 0.68%
N Indian Creek Dr Collins Ave 17,170 0.048 20,800 0.048 819 865 963 992 11.3% 0.64%
W s1 Sr N Alton Road Pine Tree Dr 4,500 0.384 6,680 0.384 1,729 1,952 2,427 2,566 24.3% 1.32%
W 47 St 1 N Alton Road Pine Tree Dr 7,110 0.608 8,740 0.608 4,325 4,588 5,147' 5,311 12.2% 0.69%
,ArthurGodfrey C Causeway Alton Rd 73,550 0.273 83,850 0.275 20,059 20,860 22,561 23,061 8.2% 0.47%
Road C Alton Rd Pine Tree Rd 42,560 0.559 48,010 0.559 23,777 24,588 26,310 26,617 7.0% 0.40%
C Pine Tree Rd Indian Creek Dr 31,960 0.178 39,280 0.178 5,702 6,050 6,790 7,007 12.2% 0.69%
C Indian Creek Or COMM Ave 12,790 0.068 15,100 0.068 867 909 998 1,024 9.8% 0.56%
Dade Blvd C 17 St Alton Road 4,330 0.251 5,310 0.251 1,068 1,154 1,294 1,335 12.1% 0.68%
C Alton Road N Michigan Ave 16,140 0.170 19,010 0.170 2,741 2,871 3,148 3,229 9.6% 0.55%
C N Michigan Ave Convention Ctr Dr 15,930 0.288 18,420 0.288 4,594 4,785 5,192 5,312 8.5% 0.49%
C Convention Ctr Dr Washington Ave 13,850 0.206 15,460 0.206 2,848 2,936 3,123 3,178 6.4% 0.37%
C Washington Ave Pine Tree Dr 19,770 0.141 19,760 0.141 2,784 2,783 2,782 2,782 0.0% 0.00%
17 Street C Bay Drive Alton Road 7,440 0.221 6,750 0.221 1,648 1,607 1,519 1,493 -5.5% -0.33%
C Alton Road Michigan Ave 16,890 0.155 19,080 0.155 2,612 2,702 2,895 2,951 7.1% 0.41%
C Michigan Ave Convention Ctr Dr 18,230 0.249 20,070 0.249 4,532 4,654 4,913 4,989 5.6% 0.32%
C Convention Ctr Dr Washington Ave 13,040 0.181 15,440 0.181 2,359 2,474 2,719 2,791 9.9% 0.56%
C Washington Ave Collins Ave 3,110 0.139 3,880 0.139 434 462 522 540 13.0% 0.73%
L incoln Road C Washington Ave [Collins Ave 8,860 0.123 9,510 0.123 1,091 1,112 1,157 1,170 4.0% 0.23%
15 Street S Alton Road Meridian Avenue 7,100 0.289 7,390 0.289 2,056 2,078 2,126 2,140 2.3% 0.13%
S Meridian Avenue Washington 5t 4,830 0.288 4,980 0.288 1,389 1,401 1,427 1,434 1.8% 0.11%
11 Street S Alton Road Michigan Ave 6,570 0.146 6,640 0.146 959 962 967 969 0.6% 0.03%
S Michigan Ave Washington St 6,540 0.374 6,560 0.374 2,448 2,450 2,455 2,456 0.2% 0.01%
5 Street 5 Alton Road Michigan Ave 34,290 0.146 37,280 0.146 4,994 5,110 5,357 5,430 4.8% 0.28%
S Michigan Ave Washington ST 31,160 0.270 33,730 0.270 8,416 8,602 8,997 9,113 4.6% 0.27%
S Washington St Collins Ave 20,600 0.062 20,950 0.062 1,270 1,276 1,288 1,292 1.0% 0.06%
S Pointe Dr 5 Alton Road Collins Ave 23,190 0.156 22,710 0.156 3,615 3,595 3,553 3,540 -1.2% -0.07%
SUBTOTALE/WM 6.663 6.665' 126,150 130,557 1.39,923 142,678 7.2% 0.41%
Alton Road N W 63 Street W 51 Street 21,660 0.936 23,870 0.936 20,269 20,821 21,994 22,339 5.6% 0.32%
N w Si Street W 47 Street 26,160 0.402 30,550 0.402 10,519 10,990 11,991 12,285 9.1% 0.52%
N w 47 Street N Bay Dr 27,290 0.550 32,680 0.551 15,006 15,807 17,509 18,010 10.8% 0.61%
N NBay Or Arthur Godfrey Rd 24,600 0.185 26,310 0.185 4,557 4,639 4,813 4,864 3.8% 0.22%
C ArthurGodfrev Rd Chase Ave 3,060 0.226 3,460 0.228 693 718 772 788 7.5% 0.43%
C Chase Ave W 29 Street 40,450 0.337 42,600 0.336 13,622 13,802 14,184 14,296 2.8% 0.16%
C W 29 Street W 23 Street 34,010 0.258 37,350 0.258 8,757 8,987 9,475 9,618 5.4% 0.31%
C W 23 Street 19 Street 34,010 0.534 37,350 0.534 18,164 18,640 19,652 19,949 5.4% 0.31%
C 19 Street Dade Blvd 37,050 0.101 40,780 0.101 3,738 3,838 4,051 4,113 5.5% 0.32%
C Dade Blvd 17 Street 45,990 0.095 49,870 0.095 4,387 4,486 4,698 4,760 4.7% 0.27%
C 17 Street 15 Street 37,260 0.325 38,610 0.325 12,110 12,226 12,473 12,546 2.0% 0.12%
5 15 Street 11 Street 34,590 0.379 36,360 0.379 13,117 13,295 13,675 13,786 2.9% 0.17%
5 11 Street 5 Street 35,100 0.489 37,220 0.489 17,174 17,451 18,039 18,212 3.4% 0.20%
S 5 Street 2 Street 29,860 0.299 29,990 0.299 8,943 8,953 8,974 8,980 0.2% 0.01%
5 2 Street S Pointe Dr 23,190 0.182 22,710 0.182 4,211 4,188 4,138 4,123 -1.2% -0.07%
La Gorce Dr N w 63 Street W 51 Street 6,150( 1.124 8,560 1.124 6,916 7,638' 9,172 9,623_ 20.1% 1.11%
P ine Tree or N W 63 Street W 51 Street 7,700 1.142 10,450 1.142 8,794 9,633 11,416 11,940 18.5% 1.02%
N W 51 Street W 47 Street 11,140 0.389 13,920 0.389 4,334 4,623 5,237 5,417 13.3% 0.75%
N w 47 Street Arthur Godfrey Rd 11,330 0.577 15,380 0.577 6,535 7,158 8,481 8,870 18.5% 1.02%
C Arthur Godfrey Rd W 2B Street 26,450 0.636 25,540 0.636 16,810 16,655 16,327 16,230 -2.0% -0.12%
C W 28 Street Washington Ave 18,550 0.511 18,470 0.511 9,470 9,460 9,439 9,433 -0.2% -0.01%
Washington An C Dade Blvd 17 Street 9,670 0.401 8,360 0.401 3,873 3,733 3,435 3,347 -8.0% -0.49%
C 17 Street Lincoln Road 14,040 0.108 15,080 .1.108 1,511 1,541 1,604 1,622 4.1% 0.24%
C Lincoln Road 15 Street 7,370 0.214 8,030 0.214 1,576 1,614 1,694 1,717 5.0% 0.29%
S 15 Street Espanola Way 8,680 0.045 9,520 0.045 393 403 42S 431 5.1% 0.31%
S Espanola Way 11 Street 13,460 0.350 14,460 0.350 4,715 4,808 5,007 5,065 4.1% 0.24%
S 11 Street 5 Street 16,250 0.494 17,600 0.494 8,022 8,200 8,579 8,690 4.6% 0.27%
e oiens Avenue N W 63 Street Indian Creek Dr 13,680 0.188 14,930 0.188 2,568 2,631 2,764 2,803 5.1% 0.29%
N Indian Crook Dr W 63 Strcer NB 15,280 0.197 16,730 0.197 3,014 3,090 3,252 3,300 5.2% 0.30%
N Indian Creek Dr W 47 Street 30,990 0.959 34,260 0.959 29,717 30,552 32,325 32,847 5.8% 0.33%
N W 47 Street Indian Creek Dr 35,400 0.786 41,160 0.786 27,824 29,030 31,594 32,348 8.8% 0.50%
N Indian Creek Or W 41 Street 12,510 0.242 13,280 1.242 3,030 3,079 3,184 3.215 3.4% 0.20%
N W 41 Street 31 Street 18,650 0.279 19,710 0.279 5,193 5,272 5,440 5,489 3.2% 0.18%
N 31 Street 25 Street 16,890 0.506 17,450 0.506 8,547 8,622 8,782 8,829 1.9% 0.11%
C 26 Street 73 Street 29,680 0.281 30,050 0.281 8,340 8,368 8,428 8,445 0.7% 0.04%
C 23 Street 17 Street 22,180 0.428 22,110 0.428 9,486 9,477 9,459 9,454 -0.2% -0.01%
C 17 Street Lincoln Road 18,500 0.114 18,010 0.114 2,108 2,093 2,062 2,053 -1.5% -0-09%
C Lincoln Road Espanola Way 18,750 0.261 19,100 0.261 4,892 4,917 4,969 4,984 1.1% 0.06%
5 Espanola Way 11 Street 12,400 0.357 12,930 0.357 4,424 4,475 4,582 4,614 2.4% 0.14%
S 11 Street S Street 12,550 0.504 13,230 0.504 6,333 6,423 6,616 6,672 3.0% 0.17%
5 5 Street S Pointe Dr 13,530 0.448 13,230 0.448 6,057 6,021 5,945 5,923 -1.3% -0.07%
Indian Creek Or C W 44 Street 41 Street 26,910 0.232 32,900 0.232 6,242 6,612 7,399 7,630 11.9% 0.67%
C 41 Street Collins Ave 18,820 0.802 19,100 0.802 15,097 15,156 15,280 15,317 0.8% 0.05%
�
SUBTOTAL N/S _ 17.67 17.17 371,760 360,633 339,444 404,977 4.9% 0.29%
6,
TOTAL 24.63 24.64 497,900 611,200 63400,647,700 5,5% 0.32%
INCREASE IN VMT VERSUS 2018 Base ( 28,200 34,100
22
Page 1419 of 2557
Table 2 - Residential Growth
Residential Units 2018 to 2035
TAZ Location Zone 2010 2015 2018 2025 2035 2040 Diff. Gr./Yr
3520 Beach N 3,094 3,160 3,199 3,292 3,423 3,489 224 0.40%
3526 Beach N 2,172 2,363 2,478 2,746 3,129 3320 651 1.38%
3527 Beach N 2,925 3,089 3,187 3,416 3,743 3,906 556 0.95%
3531 Beach N 1,109 1,167 1,202 1,284 1,401 1,459 198 0.90%
3532 Beach N 180 217 239 291 365 402 126 2.52%
3533 Beach C 1,201 1,246 1,274 1,337 { 1,428 1,473 154 0.67%
3535 Beach C 1,664 1,742 1,788 1,897 2,052 2,130 264 . 0.81%
3544 Beach C 927 1,081 1,173 1,388 1,695 1,848 522 2.19%
-�
3545 Beach 5 269 342 386 489 636 709 249 2.97%
3555 Beach S 399 535 616 807 1,078 1,214 462 3.34%
3556 Beach S 796 831 851 900 969 1,004 118 0.77%
3559 Beach S 235 270 291 341 411 446 120 2.04%
3560 Beach S 452 475 489 521 - 566 589 78 0.87%
3521 North N 1,635 1,648 1,656 1,675 1,701 1,714 45 0.16%
3522 North N 2,168 2,244 2,290 2,397 2,549 2,625 259 0.63%
3523 North N 2,075 2,126 2,157 2,229 2,331 2,382 174 0.46%
3525 North N 1,818 1,892 1,936 2,040 2,187 2,261 251 0.72%
3528 North N 962 972 978 992 1,011 1,021 33 0.20%
3529 North C 878 936 971 1,052 1,167 1,225 197 1.09%
3530 North C 926 1,053 1,129 1,307 1,561 1,688 432 1.92%
3534 Centrals C 1,056 1,087 1,106 1,150 1,213 1,244 107 0.54%
' 3539 Central W C 856 913 947 1,027 1,141 1,198 194 1.10%
3538 Central S C 385 399 407 426 453 467 46 0.64%
. 3537 Central S C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
3542 Central S S 879 i 979 1,039 1,179 1,378 1,478 339 1.68%
3542 Central SW 5 879 979 1,039 1,179 . 1,378 1,478 339 1.68%
3543 Central SE S 1,008 1,124 1,194 1,357 i 1,590 1,706 396 1.70%
3548 South NW S 1,813 1,867 1,899 1,975 I 2,083 2,137 184 0.54%
3547 South NC 5 753 791 814 867 942 980 129 0.87%
3546 South NE 5 1,684 1,734 1,763 1,833 1,932 1,982 169 0.54%
3549 South W S 1,378 1,424 1,451 1,515 1,606 1,651 155 0.60%
3553 South C 5 1,838 1,868 1,886 1,928 1,988 2,018 102 0.31%
3554 South E S 1,660 1,688 1,705 I 1,745 1,801 1,829 96 0.32%
3552 South W S 418 473 506 i 584 694 j 749 188 1.87%
3551 South C S 803 822 834 861 899 918 65 0.44%
3558 South S 515 528 1 535 553 578 591 43 0.46%
Subtotal Beach North B 9,480 9,996 10,306 11,028 12,060 12,576 1,754 0.93%
Subtotal Beach Central B 3,792 4,069 4,234 4,622 5,175 5,451 940 1.19%
Subtotal Beach South B 2,151 2,453 2,634 3,057 3,660 3,962 1,026 1.95%
Subtotal Beach B 15,423 16,517 17,174 18,706 20,895 21,989 3,721 1.16%
Subtotal North N 10,462 10,871 11,116 11,689 12,507 12,916 1,391 0.70%
Subtotal Central C 5,063 5,481 5,732 6,317 7,153 7,571 1,421 1.31%
Subtotal South S 10,862 11,194 11,393 11,859 12,523 12,855 1,129 0.56%
Total All A 41,810 44,064 45,416 48,571 53,078 55,331 7,662 0.92%
RESIDENTIAL GROWTH(vs.2010): 2,254 3,606 6,761 11,268 13,521 k 17% 0.92%
Notes:
Residential data for 2018 and 2035 was interpolated from SERPM7 2010 and 2040
adopted models. Residential units growth from 2018 to 2035: 7,662 Units
Average daily trips per unit(ITE 9th Edition - #210#220#230): 7.33 trips/unit
Total New Residential Trips: 56,162 trips
23
Page 1420 of 2557
Table 3 - Employment Growth
Employment 2018 to 2035
TAZ Location Zone 2010 2015 2018 2025 2035 2040 Diff. Gr./Yr
3520 Beach N 2,957 3,094 3,176 3,368 3,641 3,778 465 0-81%
3526 Beach N 2,272 2,452 2,559 2,811 3,170 3,349 610 1.27%
3527 Beach N 3,162 3,401 3,545 i 3,880 4,359 , 4,598 814 1.22%
3531 Beach N 1,291 1,310 1,321 1,348 1,385 1,404 64 0.28%
3532 Beach _ N 278 316338 { 391 466 504 128 ' 1.91%
3533 Beach C 1,014 1,057 I 1,083 1,144 1,230 1,273 147 ! 0.75%
3535 Beach C 1,958 2,059 , 2,119 2,260 2,461 2,561 342 0.88%
3544 Beach C 927 1,111 1,222 1,480 1,848 2,032 626 ' 2.46%
3545 Beach S 297 386 440 565 743 832 303 3.13%
3555 Beach S 155 271 341 504 737 853 396 4.63%
3556 Beach S 582 649 690 784 919 986 229 1.70%
3559 Beach 5 165 201 222 273 344 380 122 2.60%
3560 Beach S 645 664 675 701 738 756 63 0.53%
3521 North N 2,535 2,515 2,504 2,476 2,437 2,417 -67 l -0.16%
3522 North N 2,310 2,443 2,523 2,710 2,977 3,110 453 0.98%
3523 North N 2,176 2,267 12,322 2,449 2,631 2,722 309 0.74%
3525 North N 2,016 2,142 2,218 2,395 2,647 2,773 429 1.05%
3528 North N 1,350 1,415 1,454 1,545 1,674 1,739 220 0.83%
3529 North C 1,590 1,630 1,654 1,711 1,791 1,831 137 0.47%
3530 North C 1,463 1,598 1,679 1,869 2,139 2,274 460 1.43%
3534 Central 5 C 1,553 1,591 1,614 1,667 1,743 1,781 129 0.45%
3539 Central W C 1,328 1,410 1,460 1,575 1,740 1,822 280 1.04%
3538 Central S C 336 351 361 382 413 428 52 0.80%
3537 Central S C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
3542 Central S S 890 997 1,061 1,212 1,426 1,533 364 1.75%
3542 Central SW S 890 997 1,061 1,212 1,426 1,533 364 1.75%
3543 Central SE S 895 1,030 1,111 1,301 1,571 1,706 460 2.06%
3548 South NW S 1,984 2,053 2,094 2,191 2,328 • 2,397 234 0.63%
3547 South NC S 861 ' 913 943 1,016 1,119 1,170 175 1.01%
3546 South NE S 1,685 1,761 1,807 I 1,914 2,066 2,142 259 0.79%
3549 South W 5 1,466 1,527 1,563 1,648 1,769 1,829 206 I 0.73%
3553 South C S 1,593 1,652 1,688 1,771 1,890 1,949 202 0.67%
3554 South E S 1,344 1,429 1,480 1,599 1,769 1,854 289 ' 1.05%
3552 South W 5 397 424 441 479 534 561 93 11.13%
3551 South C S 830 876 903 968 1,059 1,105 156 0.94%
3558 South S 550 _ 557 562 572 I X87 594 25 0.26%
Subtotal Beach North B 9,960 10,572 10,939 11,797 l13,021 13,633 2,081 1.03%
Subtotal Beach Central B 3,899 4,227 4,424 4,883 5,538 5,866 1,115 1.33%
Subtotal Beach South B 1,844 2,171 2,367 2,826 3,480 3,807 1,112 2.29%
Subtotal Beach B 15,703 16,970 17,730 19,505 22,039 23,306 4.309 1.29%
Subtotal North N 13,440 14,011 14,354 15,153 16,295 16,866 1,941 0.75%
Subtotal Central C 5,892 6,377 6,668 7,348 8,318 8,803 1,650 1.31%
Subtotal I- South S 10,710 11,192 11,481 y 12,156 13,119 13,601 1,638 0.79%
Total All A 45,745 48,550 50,233 54,161 59,771 62,576 9,538 1.03%
EMPLOYMENT GROWTH(vs.2010): 2,805 4,488 8,416 14,026 16,831 19% 1.03%
Notes:
Employment data for 2018 and 2035 was interpolated from SERPM7 2010 and 2040 models.
Employment growth from 2018 to 2035: 9,538
employees
Average daily trips/employee (ITE 9th Ed- #710#720#730#815#826): 15.08 trips/employee
Total new employee trips: 143,827 trips
24
Page 1421 of 2557
an }` e e o e * o * * oe oe e`e e e 3e e a o e o ae oe \ * * * \ \ v oe e 3e 3e o * o * * * X aR 'R a e0o O QL b o r O m Q7 t0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 m m M M .7 n m .-/ m o Ot o 6 o in 00 ..1 .^I n . .•t
m ` rn 0 mo N o o .'1 M m 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o m m 0i 01 H H n to 0s 0 .11 0 0 0 .•1 •+ m t0 n a a
N l.7 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 O O O O O 6 0 6 0 0 6 t0 Lo t0 W 6 o CO O Lc; O .-t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tri O O O
2.^--- --- - - - ----- - - -
W a co Lapp�I Go to
N O m O . 0 a H b N O rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m m N H m H W O n 0 0 0 1D O a N O O E
'@Q O
U) a1 00 000 LLnn 00 O a1 CO 000 m co N ,� O T a0 n a tn0 n t^D o +O pNpp N C -1/8...2.
st al n N V a H 01 01 N a O N O O N ^ O O O O O O W O La e, m LO Ln t0 .a-I O M O O a H to a N pmt m i1 00 -p D `
N a Q1 f\ �••i Hi .i M m .1 rj N V 00 m H M 01 01 to C w N
N
u1 N M e-1 •"t 03 a1 N- CO
— - - -.- -- - --- — - o CO N 01
O O
M N. Q1 V 00 N Q1 a N to m m N. Ln N N 0M N .•L O f\ n O• r r r
O 00 r` M a v H m NT N V 00 N O O N N O O O O O O N up H H al to a l0 .Ni o H O 0 a '-' 4 a cn CO /t N.
N M ^ H .-1 e-1 M M H H N O O m H M kn. In m •a-1 OD 000111 Ht-i c
f` m N H N LU
tO i:: C In oo m
1.0 CO
0 C O N O CO -d- H 01 000 f^-/ a 00 d O O N n 0 0 0 0 6 6 O O0 00 mN Ln m N r� O lfrf 60 6 0 CO
a 0 a m 1.... 0 N 1Y�al N U) in
♦Ii J C1 m s Co N a a M ..I N Kj to Op uj 01
V W N H H H. f1] .1 .-1 In Ln M e•t .� Q LO
N
01) 0 173
= oo w L0 M N Ln r, Nn m o CO a CO 0
O H LP on s 00 m Lo m al a O m a N N Co H to LO a) co o to et 0 m O M O M co U N N
O V G1 LD C M `I _,a)
n `"i co 00 TT O o N N O O o 0 0 o t\ N a V 0 ren H et V O N O o a 0 M N M m /Nn N a 0 O ao
N .-I.-1 .--i m .1 .1 U1 N M .-i H TtQ
-- ▪ OQ)
U1 tO C (0
en .y 00 O0 to tol. m U1 m M N H M H m a t0 co co N O ,n Irl a V N a
OLn a M H an r H m 0o a o O N ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln M M M , Ln H tt N O N O o .. m m Ny Oy M h co
I- N C' O 0 - m N et H M H N 1r1 N t` V m C
H• H rr . a to 01 .•r r•t 3 O
to -
- --- Co U
N H 0 W
D a r" CO Ln rnn H CA N• OH 01 COMd 0 0 N ^ o b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a m o m O 0 0 0 o a ch N ..1 VI ma, aj _ n,0 13 el w
N a 01 LO .-1 .-1 .� M M H .i N a Co .-1 N a m M ^ a C o a)
.1 H 00 N W
o to o F-
01 O 0 La
O Z Z Z ZZ 0 0 0 UI N Ln in Z Z 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 UN Ln N n Ln LV) N Ln v1 {n Ln Ln m m m t8 Z U to < N N O E
N to N0
w 1 s F Sx cp O N CO
C N to LI) fn N LJ W w t b ] ` ,, Q.
O .0 L _0 .0 L L L .0 L L .0 L L L L L L L L L U7 _ Z Z Z > u U L 0 C O -C = E j -
'' IC IC (C m (0 m m IC (0 (0 (0 (O t C >r t t -t i �o ,- �- m L L Y Y L Y Y w �, Z v to - 0 O r O.-
y
010) d 01 d C) d d d d d d a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C C C C a-+ a' -5 m 7 3 0 7 0 L L y O 01 Q Ct t0 -- 0)
O m CO c0 c0 m CO m 0] m 0] 0] 00 (O ZZZZZZZ d N d d d C O p p LO t0 0 O 0 0 0 u % 00Z U •^ 0 @ O ..- '"
U U U U U v U to Nin n d d 2 •o m.- _
CIO m `° , o E E •% 3
I
•
O o o m w
O tD N H N M Ln to to CD 01 O rt N M to 00 01 O a 01 W n N N M CO n LD M a N .ti CO " +' �' I O O O7 Z
N N N M m M Al a m M in lip N N N N N N M m m m m a a a a a a a Ln in U! N to 0 0 2 ��i J N W
In Lo in to in tit N LR to to Ln to N U/ N In In in m to to In m to to to lA N IPI In N In N N N to r aI a+ 3. 0 W y d: '- c0
m m M M Mim m m m m m m m m M m m m m m m m m M M M m m m m m M m M M M� N • a F- O 0 0 0 > 0
I Z = IQF-
Table 5 -VMT & PMT & Mobility Fee Cost Per PMT
RESIDENTIAL
%Split New Trips Trip Length VMT Occupancy PMT
Travel Mode [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Vehicle 43% 24,150 4.11 99,257 1.6 158,811
Other 12% 6,739 4.11 27,697 1.6 44,315
Transit 20% 11,232 4.11 46,164 1 46,164
Bike 8% 4,493 2 8,986 1 8,986
Walk 17% 9,548 1 9,548' 1 9,548
Sub-Total 100% 56,162 3.42 191,6521 4.77 267,824
EMPLOYMENT
Travel Mode %Split New Trips Length(miles) VMT Occupancy PMT
Vehicle 43% 61,846 5.1 315,415 1.6 504,664
Other 12% 17,259 5.1 88,021 1.6 140,834
Transit 20% 28,765 5.1 146,702 1 146,702
Bike 8% 11,506 2 23,012 1 23,012
Walk i 17%, 24,451 1 24,451 1 24,451
Sub-Total j 100% 143,827 4.16 597,601 5.84 839,663
HOTEL
Travel Mode %Split New Trips Length(miles) VMT Occupancy PMT
Vehicle 43% 4,722 3.6 16,999 1.6 27,198
Other 12% 1,318 3.6 4,745 1.6 7,592
Transit 20% 2,196 3.6 7,906 1 7,906
Bike 8% 879 2 1,758 1 1,758
Walk 17% 1,867 1 1,867 1 1,867
Sub-Total 100%l 10,982 3.04 33,275' 4.22 46,321
•
Total Trips 210,971 3.91 822,528 5.47 1,153,808
Total Trips(15% Internalization) 179,325 3.91 699,149' 5.47 980,737,
Priority I, II & Ill Projects Total Mobility Costs [7] $126,878,500
Average Mobility Fee Cost per Person- Mile of Travel [8] $129.37
Notes:
[1] Modal splits based on the City of Miami Beach Transportation and Pedestrian/Bike Master Plans.
[2] Total trips based on ITE trip rates and SERPM7 Zonal Data growth between 2018 and 2035.
[3] Average vehicular trip length based on NHTS database using records specific to Miami Beach.
[4] VMT=Vehicle-Mile of Travel. Bike&Walk Trip lengths assumed at 2 & 1 miles respectively.
[5] Vehicle occupancy consistent with the City's Master Plans.
[6] PMT= Person-Mile of Travel.
[7] The total estimated mobility cost is based on City's Master Plans.
[8] The average cost per person-mile is used to develop the Mobility Fee Schedule for various land uses.
26
Page 1423 of 2557
SECTION 6 - Comprehensive Plan & LDR Review
Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulation Review
A thorough review of the City's current Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations was performed. Both documents will require revisions; some that are
minor, and others that are key to the objective of Mobility Fee implementation. There
are many references in both documents to transportation concurrency under Florida
Administrative Code Rule 9J-5, as well as the three TCMAs which will no longer be
applicable upon adoption of a Mobility Fee ordinance.
Comprehensive Plan
The current Comprehensive Plan directed "an examination of total mobility" and
identification of funding sources for the implementation and enhancement of alternative
modes of travel. Now new and revised Goals, Objectives and Policies to support and
implement the Mobility Fee should be inserted within the Plan.
In addition, there are references to the 2016 Transportation Master Plan which also has
references to TCMAs and transportation concurrency; therefore the Master Plan may
also need to be addressed once the Mobility Fee is adopted. Refer to Attachment N for
the Comprehensive Plan Revisions Needed Table.
Land Development Regulations
Upon approval of an ordinance establishing a Mobility Fee, the Land Development
Regulations need to be updated to codify the process. Aside from development of new
regulations, in the existing LDRs, there are several references to other parts of the
Chapter that may change and therefore careful attention should be taken where
references are made for the new mobility fee. For example, there is currently a circular
reference between Section 118-7, Section 130-132, and Appendix A which conflict
when it refers to the dollar amount of the parking in-lieu fee.
27
Page 1424 of 2557
Section 122, Concurrency Management, will require changes to all of the regulations.
Some may be deleted entirely, and others may have to be revised to reference the
Mobility Fee instead of concurrency.
The parking requirements were reviewed and suggestions were provided for revision in
alignment with the concept of reducing travel by single occupant vehicles. Refer to
Attachment 0 for the Land Development Regulations Revisions Needed Table.
Parking Reduction Strategies
Cities can utilize many strategies to reduce the need for parking spaces, and
subsequently require less parking when new commercial and residential uses are
approved or constructed. A list of strategies has been provided for consideration in
Miami Beach (Attachment P). One of the strategies, a "fee in-lieu" is currently in place
in the City, but can be revised for greater impact. The "Fee in lieu of parking program"
and "Parking credit system", Articles V and VI, respectively, are in the current Land
Development Regulations.
The entire Land Development Code Section 130, Off-Street Parking, should be carefully
considered after determining the parking reduction strategies which the City would like
to implement.
28
Page 1425 of 2557
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Mobility Fee Crosswalk Table
Attachment B - Trip Generation Documentation
Attachment C - Trip Generation Rates
Attachment D - Personal Miles of Travel (PMT) Factor
Attachment E - Personal Trips
Attachment F - Residential Trip Length
Attachment G - Trip Length by Trip Purpose
Attachment H - Land Use Trip Length by Trip Purpose
Attachment I - Person Miles of Travel by Land Use
Attachment J - Mobility Fee Schedule
Attachment K - Mobility Fee Formulas
Attachment L - National Household Travel Survey Summaries
Attachment M - Miami Beach Planned Transportation Projects
Attachment N - Comprehensive Plan Revisions Needed Table
Attachment 0 - Land Development Regulations Revisions Needed Table
Attachment P - Best Practices For Reducing Parking Requirements
29
Page 1426 of 2557
Attachment A
Mobility Fee Crosswalk Table
Page 1427 of 2557
P .
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
€ 95015600 Printing, copying service Business Service Copy/Print Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95015601 Laser photo printing service Business Service Copy/Print Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services .••
E 95015602 Printing, copying service, As accessory to main occupation Business Service Copy/Print Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
e• 95018701 Fax service Business Service Copy/Print Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95010500 Janitorial and maid service(bond required) Business Service Janitorial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
95020000 Towel and linen supply service Business Service Janitorial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
95021300 Window cleaning and janitorial service; bond required Business Service Janitorial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial /Production
i
t
95011200 Landscape maintenance Business Service Maintenance Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial/Production
95020400 Typing,word processing, resume, letter writing service Business Service Secretarial General Office/Research/Higher Education /Financial/Bank
Typing,word processing, resume, letter writing service:
' 95920410 Agency(done offpremises Business Service Secretarial General Office/ Research/Higher Education / Financial/Bank
91006150 Guard, watchman, patrol agency; state license required Business Service Security General Office/ Research/Higher Education / Financial I Bank
` 95 08001 Gallery _Civic/Institutional Art Community Center/Civic/Gallery/Lodge/ Museum
' c Private schools, schools, tutorial services, colleges or other
9g015700 educational or training institutions operating for profit, for Civic/Institutional Education Private School (Pre K-12)
cNn each place of business
9,,u-'r„,
15701 Day care center, nursery school HRS state license required Civic/Institutional Day Care Day Care Center
Health club, gym (a letter of approval or exemption from
` 95009100 state department of agriculture and consumer services Civic/Institutional Fitness Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
required)
95018550 Swimming pools (concessions; Civic/Institutional _Fitness Outdoor Commercial Recreation
95019500 Tennis court Civic/Institutional Fitness Outdoor Commercial Recreation
95018500 Tag collection agencies, includes auto tags, drivers license, Civic/Institutional Government General Office/Research/ Higher Education I Financial/Bank
Ehunting and fishing licenses, boat registration, etc.): .
f
Tag collection agencies, includes auto tags, drivers license,
95018510 hunting and fishing licenses, boat registration, etc.): As an Civic/Institutional Government General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
accessory to main occu•ation
95006209 Social worker LCSW ; state license re.uired Civic/Institutional General Office/Research/ Hi.her Education/ Financial /Bank
95901000 Adult entertainment establishments; must be 300 ft. from Entertainment Adult Entertainment Bar/Night Club I Pub without food service
schools and churches
95005800 1. Dance hall/entertainment establishment without alcohol• Entertainment Dancing Bar/Night Club/ Pub without food service
(see Sec. 142-1362(b) for after hours dance halls)
95005805 2 Dance hall/entertainment establishment with alcohol Entertainment Dancing Bar/Night Club/ Pub without food service
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95001100 Arcade Entertainment Games Indoor Commercial Recreation I Health Club/Fitness
95002900 Billiards, pool tables(each table) Entertainment Games Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
95003800 Cardrooms, including but not limited to bridge Entertainment Games Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
95011801 Arcade, Each coin machine (game/jukebox) Entertainment Games Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
Machine and games, mechanical photographs, consoles,
95011802 jukeboxes, picture-taking, record-making, or other similar Entertainment Games Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness .
machines: Each machine
95240029 Entertainment establishments without dance hall Entertainment General Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness •
Entertainment
95003550 Bowling alley, per alley _Entertainment Sports Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/ Fitness
95016650 Rink, skating, bike or others, owners or persons Entertainment Sports Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
maintaining same; need commission approval
95012900 Movie theater: One screen Entertainment Theatre Movie Theater
95012901 Movie theater: Each additional screen Entertainment Theatre Movie Theater
95012902 Theaters; live shows: Entertainment _Theatre Movie Theater
9908801 Golf miniature courses Golf Sports Outdoor Commercial Recreation
08802 Golf driving courses Golf Sports Golf Course
93008100 Fuel oil dealer Industrial _Industrial Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial
9808101 Fuel bottled gas dealer Industrial Industrial _Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial
908120 Wood yard dealer Industrial Industrial Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial
Garbage, waste contractor insurance required; see Chapter
908400 90,Article IV for all requirements; state license required, Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
-+ Roll off
Garbage, waste contractor insurance required; see Chapter
95008401 90,Article IV for all requirements; state license required, Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial I Production
Franchise
Garbage,waste contractor insurance required; see Chapter
95008402 90,Article IV for all requirements; state license required, Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
Recycling (DERM permit)
Garbage, waste contractor insurance required; see Chapter
95008403 90, Article IV for all requirements; state license required, Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/ Production
Hazardous
Garbage, waste contractor insurance required; see Chapter
95008404 90,Article IV for all requirements; state license required, Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
Biohazardous
95008500 Gas companies Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
95008550 Gasoline wholesale dealer Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
Gasoline wholesale dealer,Where only fuel oil r of more
95008600 volatile than diesel oil and (not exceeding 15,000 barrels in Industrial Industrial Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
_quantity is stored -
95240030 Heavy/industrial Industrial Industrial Warehousing I Manufacturing/ Industrial I Production
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95006600 Electric light company .Industrial Manufacturing Warehousing/Manufacturing/ Industrial/Production
95008000 Fruit, nut, packing, shipping, subject to the provisions of this Industrial Manufacturing Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial
chapter
95008002 Fruit, nut, packing, shipping, subject to the provisions of this Industrial Manufacturing Warehousing I Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
chapter:As an accessory _
Manufacturers, all products; to include any assembling or
95011600 Industrial Manufacturing Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
processing operations otherwise mentioned in this section
95014350 Paper hanger Industrial Manufacturing Warehousing/ Manufacturing/Industrial /Production
95021100 Warehouse or storage yard Industrial Warehouse Warehousing/Manufacturing/ Industrial /Production
95021101 Storageyard Industrial Warehouse Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
95002750 Bed and breakfast inn; state license required Lodging Hotel/Motel Hotel/Lodging_
95003700 Cabanas(each) Lodging Hotel/Motel Hotel/Lodging
95009500 Hotel; state license required Lodging Hotel/Motel Hotel/Lodging
95016600 Roominghouses, lodginghouses, boardinghouses or Lodging Hotel/Motel Hotel I Lodging
hostels; state license required: ,
95000603 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
Dealer broker(used) _
v Boat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required,
903200 Livery tenting) requires special approvals and insurance Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales I Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
CDBoat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required,
9003401 Sightseeing, excursion Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales /Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
o Boat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required,
903402 Commercial passenger boat(per boat)_ Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning/Parts
�' Boat,ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required,
9g603403 Charter(per boat) Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required,
95003404 Towing and lightening Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95003406 Boat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Marina Marina Marina (Including dry storage)
Commercial docks
95003407 Boat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Boat Marina Marina Marina (Including dry storage)
slips
95003408 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards, insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/ Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
Docks (per linear foot)
95003410 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards, insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
Dealer(new)
95003412 12. Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle &Boat Sales/ Service I Repair/Cleaning I Parts
95003415 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards, insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle &Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
Water taxi:
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95003416 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Ferry Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
terminal
95003418 Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Marina Marina Marina (Including dry storage)
Storage bases and sheds
95009550 Boat, ship, watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning /Parts
House barges
Boat, ship,watercraft, surfboards; insurance required, Boat
99003417 or surfboard rentals, as an accessory use in hotels under Marina Marina Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
current zoning ordinance (requires special approvals and
insurancej
Boat, shi.,watercraft, surfboards; insurance re.uired, Marina Marina Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Re•air/Cleanin. /Parts
Assisted Living
95000400 Assisted living facility (ALF); requires state license Medical Facility Affordable/Workforce Housing/Micro Apartments
95005900 Dentist; state license required Medical Dental Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital •
95005910 Dental hygienists; state license required _Medical Dental Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary!Hospital
95240018 Orthodontist; state license required Medical Dental Medical/Dental/Clinic!Veterinary/Hospital
95006300 Doctors, hospital staff; state license required Medical Hospital Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
v Continuing Care Facility/Nursing Home/Memory Care/
913600 Sanitarium or institution of like character Medical Hospital
mCongregate Care Facility/Assisted/Independent Living
9E04850 Pharmacy; state license required Medical Medicine Pharmacy/Dispensary/Pain Management Clinic
Mental
909600 Hypnotist, hypnotherapist Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
N Mental
9017600 Sociologist or marriage counselor; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Mental •
95019802 Counselor, marriage, etc. Medical Health/Therapy General Office/ Research! Higher Education/Financial/Bank
Mental
95240019 Psychiatrist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic!Veterinary I Hospital
95013600 Nursing homes and private hospital; state license required Medical Nursing Home Continuing Care Facility/Nursing Home/Memory Care!
Conq_regate Care Facility/Assisted/ Independent Livi.,g
Physical
95000300 Acupuncturist; requires state license Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/ Hospital
Medical Physical Medical /Dental/Clinic/Veterinary!Hos ital
—
95004500 Chiropractor ry p
Health/Therapy
Physical
95004800 Clinic, medical, dental Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95006100 Dietician; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95006200 Doctors, physicians(all others);state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95006200 Homeopathic physicians; state license required Medical Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Health/Therapy............................................. ..
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
Physical
95006203 Therapist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/ Hospital
95006400 Doctors, physicians assistant; state license required Medical Physical Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/ Hospital
Health/Therapy
95006700 Electrologists; state license required Medical Physical Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Health/Therapy
95010900 Laboratory(chemical, dental,optical, x-ray, etc.) Medical Physical Medical/ Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
(independent); state license required Health/Therapy
95010901 Laboratory technicians, including the taking of blood Medical Physical Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
pressure _ Health/Therapy
Physical
95011999 Massage clinic; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95012000 Massage therapist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95013900 Optician; state license required Medical Health/TherapT Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95(914000 Optometrist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
to Physical
914200 Osteopath; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
914700 Pathologist; all Medical _Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
^' Physical
915000 Phlebotomist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical / Dental I Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95015300 Physiotherapist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical / Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
Physical
95015500 Podiatrist; state license required Medical Health/Therapy Medical/Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
95006500 Dog grooming or small animal clinic Medical Veterinary Medical / Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
95300000 Veterinarian or veterinarian surgeon Medical Veterinary Medical /Dental/Clinic/Veterinary/Hospital
95002100 Bail bonds Misc Financial General Office/ Research / Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
Building and loan associations, mortgage companies,
95003600 saving and loan associations, financial institutions (each Misc Financial General Office/ Research / Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
branch thereof); state license required
95003602 Auto teller machine (off premises of financial institution) Misc Financial Bank Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru
(each machine Lane
95004200 Check cashin office Misc Financial Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95012500 Money order a_genc Misc Financial Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95018700 Telegraph companies, money wire Misc ;Financial Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95000619 Home based business(plus occupation) Misc General Business General Office I Research I Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95000657 Production company Misc General Business General Office/Research /Higher Education/Financial/Bank
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95004705 Mail order business; bond required Misc General Business General Office/Research / Higher Education /Financial /Bank
95007400 Fire prevention service Misc General Business General Office/Research / Higher Education /Financial /Bank
1
95015550 Postal box rentals Misc General Business General Office I Research / Higher Education/Financial /Bank .
95015800 Process service Misc General Business General Office I Research ! Higher Education/Financial /Bank
95021500 Hall for hire Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95050199 Promoter; bond required: Single event/single location (less Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
than 150 permitted occupancy)
i
Promoter; bond required: Single event/single location
95050199 (greater than 150 permitted occupancy) Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95050200 Promoter; bond required: Multiple event/single location Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
(less than 150 permitted occupancy)
95050200 Promoter; bond required: Multiple event/single location Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
- _(greater than 150 permitted occupancy)
co
•9.450201 Promoter; bond required: Multiple event/multiple location Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
(less than 150 permitted occupancy)
Promoter; bond required: Multiple event/multiple location
950201 (greater than 150 permitted occupancy) Misc General Business Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
900000 Conditional use Misc General Business General Office/Research / Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
—N/A Charitable, etc, organizations; occasional sales,fundraising Misc General Business Community Center/Civic/Gallery/Lodge/Museum
95017900 Sound recording operator Misc Recording General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95017905 Sound recording studio Misc Recording General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial /Bank
95000200 Accountant, auditor; requires state license Office Financial General Office/Research/ Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95000201 Tax service Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education!Financial/Bank
95000610 Mortgage broker, all firms; state license required: Office Financial General Office/ Research! Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95000610 Mortgage broker, all firms, state license required. Each Office Financial General Office/Research I Higher Education/Financial /Bank
additional broker connected therewith
95000652 Mortgage broker, all firms; state license required' Office Financial General Office/ Research /Higher Education/Financial/Bank •
Salesman; state license required
95001000 Appraiser Office Financial General Office/ Research /Higher Education I Financial/Bank '.
95005200 Collection agency Office Financial General Office! Research ! Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95009900 Income tax service Office Financial General Office/ Research /Higher Education/Financial /Bank
95010400 Investment counselor; state license required Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95012400 Money broker Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/ Bank
95016800 Sales office, developers, temporary Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education I Financial / Bank
95018300 Stockbrokers (full service); stat',license required: Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial / Bank
95018305 Stockbrokers(full service); state license required: Sixteen Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education I Financial/ Bank
to 20 employees
95240028 Credit bureau Office Financial General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95000500 Advertising, all kinds Office General Office General Office I Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
Agents, bureau, brokers, operators or dealers of all kinds,
including commercial, insurance, loans, claims,
95000601 transportation, manufacturer or any other kind of business Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial /Bank
or occupation except pawnbrokers, for each class of
business handled, etc, unless covered elsewhere in this
section; appropriate license required _ .
95000606 Insurance agency Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
9900607 Real estate brokerage firm, corp.; state license required: Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
Each broker with firm
co
oo
95000614 Theatrical agency Office General Office General Office I Research/Higher Education / Financial /Bank •
9000616 Theatrical producer Office General Office General Office I Research I Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
9k00625 Model, talent agency; state license required Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education /Financial/ Bank
4.1
900649 Insurance agency, Insurance b-oker Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education I Financial/Bank
95000652 Real estate brokerage firm, corp.; state license required: Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education / Financial/Bank
Each salesman with firm
95000659 Casting office Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/ Bank
95000659 Talent/modeling agency; state license required Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/ Bank
95000670 Real estate brokerage firm, corp.; state license required: Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial/ Bank
95001200 Architect; state license required Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education /Financial / Bank
95001600 Attorneys; appropriate license required Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education /Financial / Bank
95004600 Consultant, advisor, practitioners Office General Office (General Office/ Research/Higher Education/Financial/ Bank
95004700 Clerical office (mail order, requires bond) Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial /Bank
95005300 Convention service bureau Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95005500 Court reporter Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education I Financial I Bank
95006265 Professional association, corporation Office General Office General Office/Research /Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95006800 Employment agency(bond required) Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education / Financial /Bank
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95006900 Engineers, all; state license required Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education / Financial/ Bank
95009200 Health maintenance plan Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education / Financial/Bank
95009700 Immigration service Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95009800 Import and export dealer Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95010100 Insurance agency, Casualty and liability Office General Office General Office / Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95010101 Insurance agency, Fire Office General Office General Office/ Research 1 Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95010102 Insurance agency, Industrial Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95010103 Insurance agency, Life Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95010105 Insurance agency, Company Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95010200 Insurance agency, Adjuster Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/ Financial /Bank
95011000 Land development companies; state license req.iired Office General Office General Office/ Research I Higher Education/ Financial /Bank
95011100 Landscape architects, contractors, nursery men, etc. Office General Office General Office/ Research/Higher Education I Financial I Bank
9T11700 Manufacturer representative Office General Office General Office/Research I Higher Education/ Financial I Bank
99013800 Office, other than listed Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial /Bank
9614600 Party planner Office General Office General Office/Research I Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
cn
915900 Property management, or the business of opening and Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education! Financial /Bank
closing of homes, or both
916000 Public relations Office General Office General Office/ Research/ Higher Education/Financial/Bank
95016100 Publisher `Office General Office General Office! Research/Higher Education!Financial I Bank
95020300 Travel bureau; state certificatei
required Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial!Bank
_
95020302 Tour: Agency; state certificate required Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial /Bank
,
E 95020304 Tour: Service and information (sold elsewhere) Office General Office General Office/Research/ Higher Education/Financial /Bank
, 95240008 Marine appraiser, surveyor, testing Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/Financial /Bank
95240015 General business office uses Office General Office General Office/Research/Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
95008302 Auto/truck, Body shop/garage/storage Personal Service Auto Related Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
E 95008303 Auto/truck, Painting Personal Service Auto Related Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning! Parts
95008305 Auto/truck,Wash and detailing, mobile Personal Service Auto Related Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales/Service/Repair!Cleaning/Parts
P 95008307 Auto/truck,Wash and detailing and gas station, etc. Personal Service Auto Related Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning I Parts
2002600 Beach front concession, Upland fee,per unit ,Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
Alcohol beverage establishments selling beer,wine and/or
95000700 liquor for consumption on premises: Open after midnight, Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
closing no later than 2:00 a.m.
Occupation —...... ----..TA__ . . _.. _ _ - s Intermediate k
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Cate o Final Reccomended Category
gory t
Alcohol beverage establishments selling beer, wine and/or
95000701 liquor for consumption on premises: Open after 2:00 a.m., Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
closing no later than 5:00 a.m.
95000702 Restaurant and bars: No sale of alcohol beverage for on Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
premises consumption _
95002601 Beach front concession, Per equip, activity/location Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar!Night Club/Pub without food service
Caterers operating mobile unit,designed and intended for
the purpose of vending from such mobile unit sa idwiches,
pastries, candy, beverages, soft drinks and like items to
workmen on construction sites, city shops, and yards.
However, no such mobile unit shall be operated on any
construction site unless a permit thereof is secured from the
city manager, application therefore having been made at
95004101 least 15 days prior to the granting of such permit. It is Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/ Pub without food service
hereby made the duty of the city manager to investigate all
applications thereof, and the city manager shall issue such
permit only after finding that the public convenience and
co necessity requires the issuance of such permit and that the
co operation of such mobile unit shall not obstruct the public
A way or create hazardous condition thereon; provided,
rn further that only one such permit shall be issued for each
o construction site; each unit; state license required.
ar
c, Restaurants, drugstores or other establishments serving
c" food permitting the operation of cafe, cafeteria, dining room,
9516400 tearoom or restaurant takeout with chairs,or stools, each to Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Restaurant with seating
count as one seat
Bar(no restaurant); appropriate state licenses required.
95016400 Restaurant, add occupancy code load. See "Nightclubs" for Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/ Night Club/Pub without food service
additional fees if applicable. See"Dance halls"for
additional fees if applicable.
95016401 Restaurant and bars: Per chair 51 and up(not include Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
sidewalk cafe area)
Soda fountain/ice cream parlor, provided that soda
fountains operated in connection with regularly taxed
restaurants do not require an additional business tax
95017700 receipt. This tax receipt is restricted to soda, frozen yogurt Personal Service Bar/Restaurant Restaurant with seating I
and ice cream products.Any other item such as
sandwiches, hot dogs, pastry, etc.,will require a restaurant
business tax receipt. State license required.
5012200 Messenger service (exclusive of telerams m_ Personal Service Delivery Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
Intermediate
Occupation Business Tax CategoryCategory : • =• egory
Code Category
Express mail service: P.O. box rentals, packing and
95007250 sending; on-site copy,fax, money order, office supplies, Personal Service Delivery • • Business Services ,
stamps, money wire agent, notary, passport pho os
Express mail service:All of number 1, plus answering
95007251 service(5 phones) Personal Delivery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95002800 Bicycle, rent and repair Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95003900 Carpet and rug cleaning Personal Service General Service Warehousing/ Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
95004100 Caterers; state license required Personal Service General Service Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial I Production
95006000 Private investigative agency, department of state license Personal General Office/ Research /Higher Education/Financial/Bank
required
95006255 Healers, magnetic Personal Service General Service General Office/Research /Higher Education/ Financial/Bank
9W06801 Escort service(bond required) Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
•.$07300 Pest control; state license required Personal Service General Service Warehousing /Manufacturing /Industrial/Production
Fortunetellers, palmists, clairvoyants,astrologen ,
9t907900 phrenologists, physiognomist, • •g . readers PersonalPersonal
---1 and others of a similar nature
O
Fortunetellers, palmists, clairvoyants,astrologers,ry0.1
numerologists, mind readers
907950phrenologists '-rsonal Service General Service Retail Sales/Personal • Business Services
and others of a similar nature Where not gratuitous, not in a
nightclub or accesso to main business, each individual
95008200 Funeral horne • - • • • Production
95010000 Installers, floor covering, caret, tiles, •lass, etc. Personal Service General Service Warehousing /Manufacturing / Industrial/Production
95010300 Interior decorators whose business is confined to furnishing
Personal Warehousing/ Manufacturing/ Industrial /Production
curtains, draperies, hangings, furniture, etc., exclusively •
95010301 Interior designers; state license required Personal Service GeneralGeneral Office/Research/Higher Education I Financial /Bank
950114010 Locksmith Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95015100 . .. .. . . .- - .. • • . 11111.1 Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95015101 Photography, drop off developing only, not done on-site Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95015400 Picture framing Personal Service General Service Retail Sales I Personal and Business Services
95015702 Tutorial service Personal Service General Service General •ffice/ Research/ Higher Education
Repair shops including upholstering, furniture repairing,
95016300 knife and lawnmower sharpening/repair, etc, for•aach place Personal Service General Service War- . . . . Production
of business
95017200 Shoe repairing Personal Service General Service Retail Personal
95017500 Sign writers Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/Personal • Business Services
95018405 Tailor/alterations: Personal Service General Service Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95011302 Laundry dry cleaners Personal Service Laundry Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95011303 Laundry dry cleaners (remote location) Personal Service Laundry Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Laundry coin operated location, each(includes accessory
95011304 Personal Service Laundry Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
folding and hand ironing)
95011305 Laundry(coin equipment distributor) Personal Service Laundry Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95011307 Laundry, Each machine Personal Service ,Laundry ,Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95011307 Laundry, coin operated equipment not licensed by one of Personal Service Laundry Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
the above listings, each machine
95000665 Baths, Turkish, mineral, sun or similar Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Barbershop(with or without manicurist and shoeshine
95002400 stands, each shop); requires a state license; each barber Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/Personal/Business Services '
needs to have his own business tax receipt:
95002401 Barber; requires state license Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Beauty parlors, hairdressing, fecial, nail shop, etc., each
95002700 shop; state license required; each manicurist/beautician Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
needs to have their own business tax receipt:
9002701 Beautician; state license required Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
917800 Tanning salon/solarium Personal Service Personal Grooming Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services l
9;TI‘06250 1. Tattoo establishment; state license required Personal Service Tattoo Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
u., 2. Tattoo artist/body piercing (each person); state license r
96L06250 Personal Service Tattoo Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
N required
Apartment buildings(rental), not including kitchens and
900000 Residential Apartment Multi Family Apartments E
bathrooms; (insurance and state license required) E
95003100 Boardinghouse (as defined in section 17-1 of this Code): Residential Boardinghouse Residential .
95800000 Condo(no state license required) Residential Condo Residential E
N/A Apartment buildings(condominium); needs certificate of Residential Condo Multi Family Apartments 1
use only
95000630 Auto/truck, Broker(no vehicles on premises) Retail Auto Related Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
95001704 Auto/truck, Dealer Retail Auto Related Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts E
95000550 Alterations/tailor, Each shop Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95000551 Alterations/tailor, In another sho• Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95000627 Currenc exchange Retail General Retail Retail Sales!Personal and Business Services
95000800 Antique dealer, those who deal in pre owned merchandise Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
are not required to obtained a secondhand dealer license
95001400 Arms,ammo, •istols, knives, etc. Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95001401 Starting,tear •as and B.B. guns Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95001500 Artists, including, retouching, sketching, cartooning, crayon Retail General Retail General Office/ Research/ Higher Education /Financial/Bank
or ferrot se or other similar line
95001650 Auction business; state license required Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95004900 Closing out sale: Good for 30 days Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95004901 Closing out sale: Additional 15-day periods Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95005000 Coin dealers Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Coin operated merchandise or service vending machines,
95005101 except machines vending newspapers or drinking cups not Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal 1 Business Services
otherwise provided for herein: 1 cent to 25 cent machines
(each mach)
1 .
Coin operated merchandise or service vending machines,
• 95005102 except machines vending newspapers or drinking cups not Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
otherwise provided for herein: 25 cent machines and over
,(each mach)
. 95007100 Equipment rental Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95007104 Formal rental Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal I Business Services
95007500 Florist Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95007600 Flower stand, selling cut or potted flowers or plants Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
• 95008800 Golf pro Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
'a Jewelers shall be required to pay merchant's business tax
n)
911310600 determined as follows; (based on cost of inventory): 1st Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
4.____—.$1,000 of value or less
w Jewelers shall be required to pay merchant's business tax
ab
95010600 determined as follows; (based on cost of inventory): Each Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
ry additional $1,000-599,999
ol ol Jewelers shall be required to pay merchant's business tax
95010601 determined as follows; (based on cost of inventory): From Retail General Retail Retail Sales I Personal and Business Services
• $100,000—$199,000
Jewelers shall be required to pay merchants business tax
95010601 determined as follows; (based on cost of inventory): From Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
$200,000—$499,000 `
Jewelers shall be required to pay merchants business tax
95010601 determined as follows; (based on cost of inventory): From Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
$500,000 and over _
95010700 Key machines ,Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Coin operated merchandise or service vending machines,
except machines vending newspapers or drinking cups not
95011305 otherwise provided for herein: Distributor, coin operated Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
machine
Merchant sales (based on cost of inventory):1st$1,000 of
95012065 Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
value or less
Merchant sales (based on cost of inventory):Each
95012065 Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
additional $1,000—$99,999
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Ta.<Category Initial Category category Final Reccomended Category
Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort or description, except as
otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be
95012065 Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as •
follows; based on cost of inventory: First$1,000 of value or
less
Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort or description, except as
otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be
95012065 required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
follows; based on cost of inventory: Each additional
$1,000—$99,999
95012066 Merchant sales (based on cost of inventory):From Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
$100,000—$199,000
95012066 Merchant sales (based on cost of inventory):From Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
$200,000—$499,000
Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort cr description, exc spt as
co otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be
9512066 required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as Retail General Retail Retail Sales /Personal and Business Services
follows; based on cost of inventory: From
$100,000—$199,000
cNn Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort or description, except as
otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be
95012066 required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
follows; based on cost of inventory: From
$200,000—$499,000
Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort or description, except as
95012066 otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be Retail General Retail Retail Sales I Personal and Business Services
required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as
follows; based on cost of inventory: From $500,000 and
over
95012550 Mono•ram, silkscreen, retail Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
Merchant sales (based on cost of inventory):From$500,000
95012966 Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
and over
95013300 Newspapers or periodicals Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95017000 Dealers in pre-owned/secondhand merchandise: Goods Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
other than wearing apparel
95017001 Dealers in pre-owned/secondhand merchandise. Wearing Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
apparel
Occupation Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95017001 Secondhand dealers/dealers in preowned merchandise: Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
Pawnbroker, selling other than articles taken on pledge
must also have a regular merchant's business tax receipt,
95017003 no tax receipt issued to pawnbrokers shall be transferred Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
from the person to whom it was issued
95019000 Telephone: Sales office Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95019100 Television rental Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95019300 Tennis pro Retail General Retail Retail Sales!Personal and Business Services
•
95019900 Ticket office Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services •
95021000 Video rental (each location), includes accessory ental of Retail General Retail Retail Sales! Personal and Business Services
tape players and camcorders:
Video rental (each location), includes accessory rental of
95021005 tape players and camcorders: As an accessory to main Retail General Retail Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
; occupation
95021200 Wholesale dealers Retail General Retail _ Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Merchants, all persons engaged in the business of selling
merchandise of any kind, sort or description, except as
s
an otherwise specifically provided by this section, shall be Retail General Retail Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
@_ required to pay a merchant's business tax, determined as
t follows; based on cost of inventory:
o Food sales (retail inventory)each business, if zoning
permits, will be allowed to sell any retail food item;
9N07700 Retail Gorcery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
c,, however, all items will be totaled in their inventory
assessment; state license required: _
Food sales (retail inventory)each business, if zoning
permits, will be allowed to sell any retail food item;
95007701 however, all items will be totaled in their inventory Retail Gorcery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
assessment; state license required: 1st$1,000 of value or
less
95002200 Bakery, wholesale; state agricultural license required Retail Grocery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
4007701 Liquor sales/merchant sales(based on cost of inventory) Retail Liquor Store Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95001300 Armored car service Transportation Delivery Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95001900 Auto/truck, Auto shipper(required bond) Transportation Delivery Motor Vehicle &Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
Baggage and transfer business, including moving
95002000 Transportation Delivery Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/ Production
companies
Machine and games, mechanical photographs, consoles,
95011800 jukeboxes, picture-taking, record-making, or other similar Transportation Delivery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
machines: Distributors _
i
95020201 Transportation service (each vehicle),including but not Transportation Delivery Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
�.............................limited to vans, cars, etc.:.insurance required......................................................................................................,....................................................................................................................................................
Occupation ry _ Intermediate
Code Business Tax Category Initial Category Category Final Reccomended Category
95001707 Auto/truck, Parking garage Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95001707 Parking lot: Parking garage Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95001708 Automobile for hire, limousines,except sightseei,ig busses, Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
Each automobile
95014500 Parking lot Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95014502 Parking lot: Provisional Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service I Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95014504 Parking lot: Self parking lot Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
95014505 Parking lot: Parking valet lot only Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales I Service/Repair/Cieanii,g/ Parts
95014506 Parking lot: Temporary lot Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair I Cleaning/ Parts
95014507 Parking lot: Under utilized Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/ Service/Repair!Cleaning/ Parts
Parking lot: Valet parking (per location); insurance required.
A letter of permission from the owner,lessee or operator of
99020700 the business from which the valet service is operating must Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
be submitted prior to the issuance of a valet parking
business tax receipt. ,
9 )20700 Valet parking (see parking) Transportation Parking Motor Vehicle&Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
9,801701 Auto/truck, Rental agency Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales!Service/Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
A
95001703 Auto/truck, Sub rental agency(no cars on location) Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales!Service/Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
o_
Automobile for hire, limousines,except sightseeing busses,
901705 Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
Limousine service _
95401706 Automobile for hire, Each limousine (insurance required) Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning!Parts
95001709 Automobile for hire, limousines, except sightseeing busses, Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service/Repair/Cleaning/Parts
Eachprivate or nursery bus,per bus
Motor scooter, motorcycle, rental agency; insurance Transportation /Rental Motor Vehicle &Boat Sales I Service I Repair/Cleani:. /Parts
95012800 P P '9
required: 1 to 20 units
95012800 Motor scooter, motorcycle, rental agency; insurance Transportation Rental Motor Vehicle &Boat Sales/Service/Repair I Cleaning/Parts
required: Each unit over 20 ,
95017100 Service station: Transportation Service Station Motor Vehicle Fueling
95017400 Sightseeing buses (each bus); insurance required Transportation Touring Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
95020301 Tour: Operator; state certificate required Transportation Touring Retail Sales/ Personal and Business Services
95020100 Tow truck, wrecker associated with a service station (each Transportation Towing Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service I Repair I Cleaning/Parts .
truck , insurance re.uired
95021400 Tow truck/wrecker service, each truck,insurance resuired Trans•ortation Towin. Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/Service I Re.air/Cleanin. /Parts
Attachment B
Trip Generation Documentation
Page 1443 of 2557
Trip Generation Documentation Unit of Measure ITE Land Use Codes
Residential
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit 210, 220 1
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit 210, 220 1
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit 210, 220 '
Multi Family Apartments Per Unit 220, 221, 222, 225 1
Affordable /Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments Per Unit 220, 221, 222, 225 1
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) Per Berth 420
Golf Course Per Hole 430
Movie Theater Per Screen 444, 445 2
Outdoor Commercial Recreation Per Acre 480, 488 84491 3
Community Center/ Civic/ Gallery/ Lodge /Museum Per sq. ft. 495 & 580
Inaor Commercial Recreation / Health Club/ Fitness Per sq. ft. 492 & 493 2
Institutional
A `
Coq,tinuing Care Facility/ Nursing Home / Memory Care /Congregate Per Bed 253, 254, 255, 620
Ca* Facility /Assisted / Independent Living
tri
PriVbte School (Pre K-12) Per sq. ft. 534 & 536 4
Place of Worship, including ancillary&accessory buildings Per sq. ft. 560
Day Care Center Per sq. ft. 565
Industrial
Warehousing / Manufacturing / Industrial / Production Per sq. ft. 110, 130, 140, 150, 154, 157, 160, 170, 180
Mini-Warehousing / Boat/ RVs & Other Outdoor Storage Per sq. ft. 151
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub Per sq. ft. 155 &156
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank Per sq. ft. 710, 712, 714, 715, 750, 760, 770
Medical / Dental / Clinic/Veterinary/ Hospital Per sq. ft. 610, 630, 640, 650, 720
Trip Generation Documentation Unit of Measure ITE Land Use Codes
Service / Retail I Non-Residentivl
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services Per sq. ft. 813, 814, 815, 820, 875, 876, 879, 899
Pharmacy/ Dispensary/ Pain Management Clinic Per sq. ft. 880, 881, 882
Supermarket Per sq. ft. 850
Takeout Restaurant with no seating Per sq. ft. 935, 937, 938 5
Restaurant with seating Per Seat 931, 932, 933, 944
Restaurant drive-thru Per drive-thru 934, 9356
Bar/ Night Club/ Pub without food service Per sq. ft. 925 2
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service /Repair/Cleaning / Parts Per sq. ft. 840, 841, 843, 848, 849, 941, 943
Hotel / Lodging Per Room 310, 311
Copvenience Retail Per sq. ft. 851
Mdpor Vehicle Fueling Per Fuel Position 853, 944, 945, 960
Per drive thru lane
BaflK Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane and / or Per ATM 912
o
1 TI4 single family land use assumes 1.5 vehicles per unit under 3,500 sq. ft., 2 vehicles per unit between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. and 2.5 vehicles per unit greater than
7,0011 sq. ft. Multi-Family assumes 1 vehicle per unit and affordable housing/micro units assumes 1 vehicle per two units
2 Converted AM and PM Peak Hour Periods and applied a Peak to Daily Conversion of.1 (10% of daily traffic occurs during peak hours)
3 Golf driving range converted to acreage at two tee positions per one acre, Soccer Complex fields converted to acres at ratio of 2 acres per 1 field, Racquet/Tennis Club
assume 2 courts plus accessory buildings per acre, Utilized vehicle occupancy of 3 persons per vehicle
a Summation of AM & PM Peak Generator of Trips
5 Average of ITE 935 land use trips- drive-thru trips+ ITE 938 land use trips- ITE 937 land use trips - drive-thru trips
s The trip generation rate derived by subtracting the trip generation rate for fast food restaurants with and without drive-thru lanes
The trip generation is based on the trip rate per drive-thru lane minus the trips associated with office uses since the bank square footage, which may or may not contain
office space beyond that for tellers falls under the office land use category.
Note: Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, Principal of NUE Urban Concepts, LLC prepared the trip generation rates and consolidated land uses based on the ITE Trip Generation
Manual, 10th Edition and professional judgement based upon 20 years serving as an Impact Fee Administrator for local governments, serving in a development review
capacity for local governments, reviewing and conducting over 2,000 Traffic Impact Analysis, and updating and preparing Transportation Impact Fee and Mobility Fee
Technical Reports and Implementing Ordinances for Local Governments through-out Florida.
Attachment C
Trip Generation Rates
Page 1446 of 2557
Trip Generation Data Vehicle % New Person
Category/Land Use Type Trip Gen Trips Trip Gen
Residential
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area 6.29 1.00 8.37
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 8.38 1.00 11.15
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 10.48 1.00 13.94
Multi Family Apartments 5.16 1.00 6.86
Affordable / Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments 2.58 1.00 3.43
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) 2.41 0.50 1.60
Golf Course 30.38 0.50 20.20
Movie Theater 178.65 0.50 118.80
Outdoor Commercial Recreation 14.32 0.50 9.52
Community Center/ Civic / Gallery / Lodge / Museum 14.54 0.50 9.67
Indoor Commercial Recreation / Health Club / Fitness 35.53 0.50 23.62
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility / Nursing Home / Memory Care/
Congregate Care Facility/Assisted / Independent Living 2.52 1.00 3.35
Private School (Pre K-12) 13.58 0.50 9.03
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings 6.95 1.00 9.24
Day Care Center 47.62 0.50 31.67
Industrial
Warehousing ! Manufacturing / Industrial / Production (under roof) 4.66 0.90 5.58
Mini-Warehousing / Boat/ RVs & Other Outdoor Storage 1.51 1.00 2.01
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub 7.97 1.00 10.60
Page 1447 of 2557
Trip Generation Data Vehicle % New Person
Category/Land Use Type Trip Gen Trips Trip Gen
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank 11.41 0.80 12.14
Medical / Dental / Clinic / Veterinary / Hospital 26.02 0.80 27.69
Service I Retail / Non-Residential
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services 56.55 0.70 52.65
Pharmacy/ Dispensary/ Pain Management Clinic 150.65 0.40 80.15
Supermarket 106.78 0.60 85.21
Takeout Restaurant with no seating 433.06 0.20 115.19
Restaurant with seating 17.15 0.40 9.12
Restaurant drive-thru 356.54 0.20 94.84
Bar / Night Club / Pub without food service 113.60 0.90 135.98
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service / Repair/ Cleaning / Parts 35.00 0.70 32.59
Hotel / Lodging 6.41 1.00 8.53
Convenience Retail 762.28 0.20 202.77
Motor Vehicle Fueling 250.98 0.20 66.76
Bank Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane 113.35 0.40 60.30
Page 1448 of 2557
Attachment D
Person Miles of Travel (PMT) Factor
Page 1449 of 2557
PERSON MILES OF TRAVEL (PMT) FACTOR
Vehicle Occupancy 1.6
Future Mobility Occupancy 1.6
Non-Vehicle Occupancy 1
Vehicle Share of Trips 43%
Future Mobility Share of Trips 12%
Non-Vehicle Share of Trips 45%
Weighted Vehicle PMT 0.69
Weighted Future Mobility PMT 0.19
Weighted Non-Vehicle PMT 0.45
Person Miles of Travel Factor 1.33
Notes:
Vehicle Occupancy from Miami Beach Transportation Plan
Future Mobility (Other) Occupancy based on Vehicle Occupancy
Non-Vehicle (Walk, Bike & Transit) based on single person trip
Vehicle Mode Share from Miami Beach Transportation Plan
Future Mobility (Other) Mode Share from Miami Beach Transportation Plan
Non-Vehicle Mode Share from Miami Beach Transportation Plan
Weighted Vehicle PMT derived by multiplying occupancy by % share of trips
Weighted Future Mobility PMT derived by multiplying occupancy by % share of trips
Weighted Non Vehicular PMT derived by multiplying occupancy by % share of trips
Person Miles of Travel Factor is the summation of weighted PMT
Page 1450 of 2557
Attachment E
Person Trips
Page 1451 of 2557
Trips by Mode Share Future Person
Bike Walk Transit Vehicle
Category/Land Use Type Mobility Trip Gen
Residential
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area 0,67 1.42 1.67 3.60 1.00 8.37
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 0.89 1.89 2.23 4.79 1.34 11.15
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 1.12 2.37 2.79 5.99 1.67 13.94
Multi Family Apartments 0.55 1.17 1.37 2.95 0.82 6.86
Affordable / Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments 0.27 0.58 0.69 1.48 0.41 3.43
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) 0.13 0.27 0.32 _ 0.69 0.19 1.60
Golf Course 1.62 3.43 4.04 8.69 2.42 20.20
Movie Theater 9.50 20.20 23.76 51.08 14.26 118.80
Oatdoor Commercial Recreation 0.76 1.62 1.90 4.09 1.14 9.52
C,mmunity Center/ Civic / Gallery / Lodge / Museum _ 0.77 1.64 1.93 4.16 1.16 9.67 _
oor Commercial Recreation / Health Club / Fitness 1.89 4.02 4.72 10.16 2.83 23.62
t. Institutional
_4N
7.1 i
Citinuing Care Facility / Nursing Home / Memory Care / 0.27 0.57 0.67 1.44 0.40 3.35
Congregate Care Facility/Assisted / Independent Living
1
Private School (Pre K-12) 0.72 1 .54 1.81 3.88 1.08 9.03
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings _ 0.74 1 .57 1.85 3.97 1.11 9.24
Day Care Center 2.53 5.38 6.33 13.62 3.80 31.67
Industrial
Warehousing / Manufacturing / Industrial ! Production (under roof) 0.45 0.95 1.12 2.40 0.67 5.58
Mini-Warehousing / Boat ! RVs & Other Outdoor Storage _ 0.16 0.34 _ 0.40 0.86 0.24 2.01
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub 0.85 1.80 2.12 4.56 1.27 10.60
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank 0.97 2.06 2.43 5.22 1.46 12.14
Medical / Dental / Clinic / Veterinary / Hospital 2.21 4.71 5.54 11.90 3.32 27.69
Trips by Mode Share Future Person
Category/Land Use Type Bike Walk Transit Vehicle Mobility Trip Gen
Service/Retail/Non-Residential
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services 4.21 _ 8.95 10.53 22.64 6.32 52.65
Pharmacy / Dispensary / Pain Management Clinic 6.41 13.62 16.03 34.46 9.62 80.15
r
Supermarket 6.82 14.49 17.04 36.64 10.23 85.21
Takeout Restaurant with no seating 9.22 19.58 23.04 49.53 13.82 115.19
Restaurant with seating 0.73 1 .55 1 .82 3.92 1.09 9.12
Restaurant drive-thru 7.59 16.12 18.97 40.78 11.38 94.84
Bar/ Night Club I Pub without food service 10.88 _ 23.12 27.20 58.47 16.32 135.98
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service / Repair / Cleaning / Parts 2.61 _ 5.54 _ 6.52 14.01 3.91 32.59
Hotel / Lodging 0.68 1.45 1.71 3.67 1.02 8.53
Cdhvenience Retail 16.22 34.47 40.55 87.19 24.33 202.77
M.tor Vehicle Fueling 5.34 11 .35 13.35 28.71 8.01 66.76
k Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane 4.82 10.25 12.06 25.93 7.24 60.30
0
Tip Mode Share % used to calculate the trips per mode are from the Miami Beach Transportation Plan. The mode share % are as
foows: (1) Bike - 8%; (2) Walk - 17%; (3) Transit - 20%; (4) Vehicle - 43%; (5) Future Mobility (aka Other Modes) - 12%.
The person trip generation was determined based on multiplying the trip generation per land use by the % of new trips and then applying
the Person Miles of Travel Factor.
Attachment F
Residential Trip Length
Page 1454 of 2557
RESIDENTIAL TRIP LENGTH CALCULATION
Trip Purpose Person Trips Percent of Trip Length Weighted Trip
(Millons) Person Trips Length
To-From Work 61,214 16% 6.6 1.03
Work Related 11,943 3% 6.6 0.20
Family / Personal Errand 166,535 42% 3.4 1.44
School or Church 37,676 10% 4.4 0.42
Social / Recreation 107,722 27% 3.4 0.93
Other 6,933 2% 4.4 0.08
Total 392,023 100% 4.11
Notes:
The residential trip length calculation is based upon the total person trips for all trip purposes
The total weighted average trip length was used for the transit, vehicle, and future mobility mode
share trip length calculations for residential land uses
Trip Purpose from Miami Beach Transportation Plan and NHTS
Person Trip by Trip Purpose from Miami Beach Transportation Plan and NHTS
Percent of Person Trips was dervied by dividing person trips by trip purpose by total person trips
Trip Length from Miami Beach NHTS Analysis from K&S
Weighted Trip Length was derived by multiplying % of person trips by trip length
Page 1455 of 2557
Attachment G
Trip Length by Trip Purpose
Page 1456 of 2557
RESIDENTIAL (HOME)
Mode Share % Trip Length (miles)
Walk 0.17 1
Bike 0.08 2
Transit 0.2 4.11
Vehicle 0.43 4.11
Future Mobility 0.12 4.11
Mode Share percentage from Miami Beach Transportation Plan Mode Share Goals. Future Mobility
term used in place of term other in Transportation Plan
EMPLOYMENT/ OFFICE (WORK)
Mode Share % Trip Length (miles)*
Walk 0.17 1
Bike 0.08 2
Transit 0.2 5.1
Vehicle 0.43 5.1
Future Mobility 0.12 5.1
*Trip Length is the Average of Home Based Work (6.6)and Non-Home Base Trips (3.6)from the
NHTS data for Miami Beach
SCCIAL / RECREATION (SOC) / RETAIL (SHOP)
Mode Share % Trip Length (miles)*
Walk 0.17 1
Bike 0.08 2
Transit 0.2 3.4
Vehicle 0.43 3.4
Future Mobility 0.12 3.4
*Trip Length for Home base Shopping and Home Based Social Recreation are both 3.4 from the
NHTS data for Miami Beach
Page 1457 of 2557
DAY CARE (DC)
Mode Share % Trip Length (miles)*
Walk 0.17 0.75
Bike 0.08 1.5
Transit 0.2 2.2
Vehicle 0.43 2.2
Future Mobility 0.12 2.2
* 1/2 of trip length for Home Based Other as Day Care is generally on the way to school /work.
Home Based Other trip length from the NHTS data for Miami Beach.
NON HOME BASED (NHB)
Mode Share % Trip Length
Walk 0.17 1
Bike 0.08 2
Transit 0.2 3.6
Vehicle 0.43 3.6
Future Mobility 0.12 3.6
Trip length from the NHTS data for Miami Beach.
HOME BASED OTHER (HBO)
Mode Share % Trip Length
Walk 0.17 1
Bike 0.08 2
Transit 0.2 4.4
Vehicle 0.43 4.4
Future Mobility 0.12 4.4
Trip length from the NHTS data for Miami Beach.
Page 1458 of 2557
CONVENIENCE RETAIL (CR)
Mode Share % Trip Length (miles)*
Walk 0.17 0.5
Bike 0.08 1
Transit 0.2 1.7
Vehicle 0.43 1.7
Future Mobility 0.12 1.7
*1/2 of trip length for Home Based Other as Convenience Retail is generally on the way to school /
work/ some other destination. Pass-by only accounts for trips already on the road, it does not
account for shorther trip lenghts. Trip length from the NHTS data for Miami Beach.
Page 1459 of 2557
Attachment H
Land Use Trip Length by Trip Purpose
Page 1460 of 2557
Trip Length by Mode Future Trip
Category/Land Use Type Bike Walk Transit Vehicle Mobility Purpose
Residential
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area 2.00 1.00 4.11 4.11 4.11 HOME
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 2.00 1.00 4.11 4.11 4.11 _ HOME
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 2.00 1.00 4.11 4.11 4.11 HOME
Multi Family Apartments 2.00 1.00 4.11 4.1 1 4.11 - HOME
Affordable / Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments 2.00 1.00 4.11 4.11 4.11 HOME
Recreation & Entertainment _
Marina (Including dry storage) 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
Golf Course 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
F
Movie Theater 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
tdoor Commercial Recreation 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
_CImmunity Center/ Civic/ Gallery/ Lodge / Museum 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
I oor Commercial Recreation / Health Club / Fitness 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility / Nursing Home / Memory Care / 2.00 1 .00 4.11 4.11 4.11 HOME
Congregate Care Facility /Assisted I Independent Living
Private School (Pre K-12) 2.00 1.00 4.20 4.20 4.20 HBO
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
Day Care Center _ 1.00 0.75 2.10 2.10 2.10 DC
Industrial
Warehousing / Manufacturing / Industrial / Production (under roof) 2.10 1.00 5.10 5.10 5.10 WORK
Mini-Warehousing / Boat / RVs & Other Outdoor Storage 2.00 1.00 4.20 4.20 4.20 HBO
Distribution / Fulfillment Center I Package Deliv€ry Hub 2.00 1.00 3.60 3.60 3.60 NHB
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank 2.00 1 .00 5.10 5.10 _ 5.10 WORK
Medical / Dental / Clinic / Veterinary / Hospital 2.00 1.00 5.10 5.10 5.10 WORK
Trip Length by Mode Bike Walk Transit Vehicle Future Trip
Category/Land Use Type Mobility Purpose
Service /Retail/Non-Residential
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SHOP
Pharmacy / Dispensary / Pain Management Clinic 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SHOP
Supermarket 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SHOP
-
Takeout Restaurant with no seating 1.00 0.50 1.70 1.70 1.70 CR
r
Restaurant with seating 1.00 0.50 1.70 1.70 1.70 CR
Restaurant drive-thru 1.00 0.50 1.70 1.70 1.70 CR
Bar/ Night Club / Pub without food service 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SOC
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service / Repair/ Cleaning / Parts 2.00 1.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 SHOP
Hotel / Lodging 2.00 1 .00 3.60 3.60 3.60 NHB
Convenience Retail 1.00 0.50 1 .70 1.70 1.70 CR
Jtor Vehicle Fueling 1.00 0.50 1 .70 1.70 1.70 CR
Bik Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane 2.00 1 .00 3.60 3.60 3.60 NHB
TEth Trip Lenghts by Mode are based upon the mode share goals from the Miami Beach Transportation Plan and the National
Hdusehold Travel Survey Data for Miami Beach.
The abbreviated trip purpose is based upon the trip lenghts by trip purpose in Appendix G of the Technical Report.
Attachment
Person Miles of Travel by Land Use
Page 1463 of 2557
P
son
Person Miles of Travel (PMT) by Mode Vehicle Future lrs of
Category/Land Use Type Bike Walk Transit a cle Mobility Me
Travel
Residential
I
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area 1.34 1.42 6.88 14.78 4.13 28.55
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 1.78 1.89 9.16 19.70 5.50 38.03
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area 2.23 2.37 11.46 24.63 6.87 47.56
Multi Family Apartments 1.10 1.17 5.64 12.13 3.38 23.42
Affordable / Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments 0.55 0.58 2.82 6.06 1.69 11.71
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) 0.13 0.54 1.09 2.34 0.65 4.76
Golf Course _ 1.62 6.87 13.74 29.54 8.24 60.00
Movie Theater 9.50 40.39 80.79 173.69 48.47 352.84
Outdoor Commercial Recreation 0.76 3.24 6.47 13.92 3.88 28.28
C.mmunity Center/ Civic/ Gallery / Lodge / Museum 0.77 3.29 6.57 14.14 3.94 28.72
Ir oor Commercial Recreation / Health Club / Fitness 1 .89 8.03 16.06 34.54 9.64 70.13
-� Institutional
N
oaf
Continuing Care Facility / Nursing Home / Memory Care / 0.54 0.57 2.76 5.92 1.65 11.44
Congregate Care Facility / Assisted / Independent Living
Private School (Pre K-12) 0.72 3.07 7.59 16.31 4.55 32.24
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings 0.74 _ 3.14 _ 6.29 13.51 3.77 27.45
Day Care Center 1.90 _ 8.08 13.30 28.60 7.98 59.85
Industrial _
Warehousing / Manufacturing / Industrial / Production (under roof) 0.45 1.90 5.69 12.23 3.41 23.68
Mini-Warehousing / Boat / RVs & Other Outdoor Storage 0.16 , 0.68 1.69 3.63 1.01 7.17
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub 0.85 3.60 7.63 16.41 4.58 33.07
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank 0.97 4.13 12.38 26.62 7.43 51.54
Medical / Dental / Clinic/ Veterinary / Hospital 2.21 9.41 28.24 60.71 16.94 117.52
Person Miles of Travel (PMT) by Mode Future Person
Bike Walk Transit Vehicle Miles of
Category/Land Use Type Mobility Travel
Service/Retail/Non-Residential
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services 4.21 17.90 35.80 76.97 21.48 156.36
Pharmacy / Dispensary / Pain Management Clinic 6.41 27.25 54.50 117.17 32.70 238.03
Supermarket 6.82 28.97 57.94 124.58 34.77 253.08
Takeout Restaurant with no seating 4.61 19.58 39.17 84.21 23.50 171.06
Restaurant with seating 0.36 1 .55 3.10 6.67 1.86 13.55
Restaurant drive-thru 3.79 16.12 32.25 69.33 19.35 140.84
Bar / Night Club / Pub without food service 10.88 46.23 92.47 198.80 55.48 403.86
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service / Repair/ Cleaning / Parts 2.61 11.08 22.16 47.64 13.29 96.78
Hotel / Lodging 0.68 2.90 6.14 13.20 3.68 26.60
C'nvenience Retail 8.11 34.47 68.94 148.22 41.36 301.11
M'tor Vehicle Fueling 2.67 11.35 22.70 48.80 13.62 99.14
Bek Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane 4.82 20.50 43.42 93.35 26.05 188.14
0
T60 Person Miles of Travel by Mode is calculated based upon the Trips by Mode in Appendix E multiplied by the Trip Lenght by Mode in
AMDendix H of the Technical Report.
Attachment J
Mobility Fee Schedule
Page 1466 of 2557
Mobility Fee Schedule
Category/Land Use Type Unit of Measure Mobility Fee
Residential'
Single Family less than 3,500 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit $1,847
Single Family between 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit $2,461
Single Family greater than 7,000 sq. ft. of floor area Per Unit $3,076
Multi Family Apartments Per Unit $1,515
•
Affordable / Workforce Housing / Micro Apartments Per Unit $758
Recreation & Entertainment
Marina (Including dry storage) Per Berth $308
Golf Course Per Hole $3,881
Movie Theater Per Screen $22,823
Outdoor Commercial Recreation Per Acre $1,829
Community Center/ Civic / Gallery / Lodge / Museum Per sq. ft. $1 .86
Indoor Commercial Recreation / Health Club / Fitness Per sq. ft. $4.54
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility / Nursing Home / Memory Care / Congregate Per Bed $740
Care Facility / Assisted / Independent Living
Private School (Pre K-12) Per sq. ft. $2.09
Place of Worship, including ancillary & accessory buildings Per .q. ft. $1.78
Day Care Center Per sq. ft. $3.87
Industrial
Warehousing I Manufacturing I Industrial / Production (under roof) Per sq. ft. $1.53
Mini-Warehousing / Boat / RVs & Other Outdoor Storage3 Per sq. ft. $0.46
Distribution / Fulfillment Center/ Package Delivery Hub Per sq. ft. $2.14
Office
General Office / Research / Higher Education / Financial / Bank Per sq. ft. $3.33
Medical / Dental / Clinic /Veterinary / Hospital Per sq. ft. $7.60
Page 1467 of 2557
Service / Retail 1 Non-Residential
Retail Sales / Personal and Business Services4 Per sq. ft. $10.11
Pharmacy / Dispensary / Pain Management Clinic Per sq. ft. $15.40
Supermarket Per sq. ft. $16.37
Takeout Restaurant with no seating5 Per sq. ft. $11.07
Restaurant with seating5 Per Seat $877
Restaurant drive-thru5 Per drive-thru $9,110
Bar/ Night Club / Pub without food service4 Per sq. ft. $26.12
Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales / Service / Repair/ Cleaning / Parts Per sq. ft. $6.26
Hotel 1 Lodging 6 Per Room $1,721
Convenience Retail ' Per sq. ft. $19.48
Motor Vehicle Fueling Per Fuel Position $6,413
8 Per drive thru lane
Bank Drive-Thru Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru Lane $12,170
and ! or Per ATM
' Floor area is based on heated and/or cooled area and areas determined by building official to be habitable
2 The sq. ft. for any buildings or structure shall not be excluded from the acreage
3 Acreage for any unenclosed material and vehicle storage shall be converted to sq. ft.
'Areas under canopy for seating, display, storage and sales shall be converted to sq.ft.
5 Separate fees are associated with any drive-thru lane(s)associated with a restaurant.
6 Restaurant/ Bar/Night Club and/or retail sales, that are not exclusive to hotel guest only, shall be calculated based on the
separate applicable Land Use Classification
Convenience Retail rates are separate from the fee due for vehicle fueling positions. Rates per vehicle fueling position also
apply to gas stations and service stations with fuel pumps. The fee for any restaurant square footage, seating or drive-thru in a
convenience store will be based on the individual fee rate for the land use, not the convenience store rate
8 Bank building square footage falls under office and is an additive fee beyond the fee due for bank/ATM drive-thru lanes or free
standing ATM's. These rates are per drive-thru lane for the bank and per drive-thru lane with an ATM. The free standing ATM is
for an ATM only and not an ATM within or part of another non-financial building, such as an ATM within a grocery store
Page 1468 of 2557
Attachment K
Mobility Fee Formulas
Page 1469 of 2557
pr
Person Trips(PT)per Land Use = (TG x%NEW)x PMT Factor
Person Trips(PT) by Mode = PT x MS for each of the five modes of travel
Person Mile of Travel(PMT)per Land Use - SUM of(PT by Mode ' TL by MODE)
Person Mile of Travel(PMT)Rate = $129.37 per PMT
Mobility Fee(MF)per Land Use = (PMT'ODAF) ' PMT RT
Where:
PT = Person Trips
Person Miles of Travel Factor of 1.33 to account for
PMTF = multi-modal travel
TG = Daily Trip Generation during average weekday
NEW - Percent of trips that are primary trips,as opposed to
% pass-by or diverted-link trips
MS = Mode Share Goals per Miami Beach Transportation
Plan for each of the five modes of travel
TL = Average length of a trip by Mode and by Trip Purpose
PMT = Person Miles of Travel
PMT RT = Person Miles of Travel Rate =$129.37
ODAF = Origin and Destination Adjustment Factor of.50 to
avoid double-counting trips for origin and destination
MF = Mobility Fee calculated by(PMT x .50)x PMT RT
Page 1470 of 2557
Attachment L
National Household Travel Survey Summaries
Page 1471 of 2557
NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY-2009-SUMMARY GRAPHS TRIP LENGTHS
CAPPED AT 5.5 MILES AS ASSUMED TO EXIT CITY ROADS
Mama Sisal QEask(EeIWI Try Leh PINES W and Ph&Trip for M16Re MOM
DST TRIPS AWE DIST PALES Home Based Work(HBW)Trip Length TRIPS/WEED RISE WALK
ta
0-1 mos 0 0.50 0 140W 5 28
1.2 miles 4 1.90 625 4831408 9 79
2-3 miles 1 2.50 2.5 HBSOCREC 9 75
3.4 miles 0 3.50 0 20 480 12 52
4.5 miles 1 ASO 4.5 Po-ie 11 66
>5 miles 33 5.50 181.5 15 TOTAL 44 300
Total W S.0 154.5 la
515 PLOT Of NOW A001®SW=DortI001OAPIfi
0.1 1,2 2 4 N 4.5 5.6 61 74 R.1 1 10 +10 '
mile rm. rwW. Min malt nxW. mars min rvin ma, colo.
WoM+rAvow TVWWI 41 Si
l
44144 ShgWq INESE� r L1 TsIMO C II
Ids_11
06T TRIPS AVE IX5T MILES Home Based Shopping(HBSHOP)Trip Length r
0.1 miles 18 050 9 30 a
1-2 miles 27 152 40.5 25 -� '- S.
2.3 miles 14 2 SC 35 +
3-4 miles 2 3.50 7 o 11
4.5 codes 9 4.50 40.5 '
>5 miles 29 5.50 3_59.5 -'
Total 99 2.9 291.9E.) ..
• I11 - _ •
le
0-1 14 11 F 5 5 '.. ..
1 1R :0 Il'
n.1., r.Y. r.r. mkt reh ••rn ran mala r.r. r e. rw: 1
Wsl.ted Aeaap Trip Weill Or LI
10900EC Try 5_sa01
DIST TRIPS AVE DIST MILES Hain Based Socio-Rea/Dtlon(HBSOCRECI Trip /
Length
0-1 styes 20 0.50 10 s •
1-2 miles 13 1.50 19.5 214 _
2.3 miles 12 2.50 30 m
3.4 miles 6 3.50 21 - -
4Smiles 2 4.50 9 IS
>S miles 23 550 126.5
Tsui 71 11 216 In
0
11 .
01 1.1 1.1 +a td IV. •ia
mun 'ram m'•, m.:e. mNa mr•. .. mL1 n74. orm, ..1W
4 WMtt+tAmmo TeMlwtsa Lt A-!a,.0 Beach
1limail dd10r(E TH■Wish
Home Based Other(HBO)Trip Length 1 r'
DIST TIPS AVE11151 MMES •�I ortai
0-1,17,1e7 13 0.50 65 `a Fal
1.2 miles 5 1.50 7.5 .- ' �M I a I rl
2-3 miles 6 2.50 15 -
4� -•
34 miles 3 350 105 10r
4-5 miles 2 4.50 9 a 195
>S miles 25 5.50 137.5
Total 54 3.4 184
111111I . B1
.. ?Mrs m:ln milas mle, m;.. ,74ts e 1 mw rain ..." D
WYr14et Ammo 19 Napa la LA , .-'i-_--t
l 1:
tgarreass 4arrp alTstpLr1/h - I
Nape-Home Based(NHB)Trip Length
DOT MVPS AVE DIST HIES
•
0-1 miles 23 0.50 11.5 25
1.2 n:Nu 14 1.50 21
2.544/es 5 2.50 12.5 0) .4.
3.4 miles 6 3.50 21 a
.41 ,
4.5 mases 1 4.50 4.5 15 .
>5miles 27 55 (J`0 148.5 Dcdge ISlalnly .
Taal 76 2.9 919 ID
II . . _ II
Wal/Ire Aar+a Trip 1440 to 2s •. 's •, m,.•. r..n rr., r e• ..r m.n
Nola:
NI-ITS 1009 has 370 0800005 ler Miami Beach
Page 1472 of 2557
Attachment M
Miami Beach Planned Transportation Projects
Page 1473 of 2557
Priority 1 Improvement Projects
No Priority 1 Project Names Location Type Front To Length Description feasibility Design Construction Total Cost Note %Mobility $Mobility
la SR AlA Complete Street Feasibility Study South Multimodal Downtown Collin Ave 3.80 Feasibility $470,000 5470,000 City 100% $470,000
lb SR AlA Complete Street Feasibility Study South Multimodal Downtown Collins Ave 3.80 Design&construction 52,700,000 517,700.000 $20,400,000 Other Funds 13% 52,550,000
2 Miami Beach Light Rag/Modern Street Car South Multimodal SR A14/S St Washington Ave 4.60 Exclusive Transit&Bike Lanes $10,000,000 $240,000,000 5250,000,000 Light Rail 0% 50
3 West Ave Protected Bike Lanes South Bike/Ped 6 St 20 St 1.30 Protected/buffered bike lanes(Lane repurposing)Enhanced crosswalks $530,000 5530,000 100% 5530,000
4 One Way Protected Bike lanes-73 St North Bike/Ped Dickens Ave Atlantic Trail 0.35 Protected/buffered bike lanes(Lane repurposing)Enhanced crosswalks $139,000 $100,000 $3,820,000 $4,059,0110 Large Proj 6% 1 6239,000
S One Way Protected Bike lanes-72 5t North Brke/Ped Dickens Ave Collins Ave 0.28 Protected/buffered bike lanes(Lane repurposing)Enhanced crosswalks $139,000 5100,000 $3,820,000 $4,059,000 Large Proj 6% $239,000
6 Protected Bike Lane/Greenway-Byron Ave North Blke/Ped 73 St Hawthorne Ave 0.56 Protected/buffered bike lanes(lane repurposing)Crosswalks/Greenway 550,000 $800,000 $850,000 100% $850,000
7 Neighborhood Greenway-N Say Road Middle Bike/Ped Dade Blvd La Gorce Dr 4.60 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 5100,000 5100,000 53,750,000 53,950,000 Greenway 50% 51,975,000
8 Intersection Impr.SR 907/Alton Rd&17 St South Bike/Ped n/a n/a n/a Review geometry to add left turn lane $50,000 $330,000 $2,910,000 $3,290,000 13% 5411,300
9 Si St Green Bicycle Lanes Middle Bike/Ped Alton Rd Pine Tree Dr 0.40 Enhanced(green)bicycle Lanes $10,000 $40,000 $50,000 100% $50,000
10 63 St Feasibility study for bike alternatives Middle Multimodal Alton Rd Indian Creek Dr 0.40 Feasibility analysis for bike/transit ails consistent w/Bike Master Plan 5100,000 5100,000 100% 50
v 11 SR 907 Bike Alts Analysis&Implementation
O Middle Bike/Ped Michigan Ave Chase Ave 0.93 Analysis&Implementation of separated or protected bike facilities 550,000 5368,000 $418,000 100% 5418,000
e 12 Dade Blvd shared use path&road diet South Bike/Ped 17 St Pine Tree Dr 1.00 Feasibility study&implementation adjacent to Collins Canal 5207,000 $3,880,000 $4,087,000 Large Proj 80% $3,269,600
13 Euclid Ave Protected Bike Lanes South Bike/Ped 2 Ave 16 St 1.15 Protected bike lanes&neighborhood greenway 550,000 5420,000 $470,000 100% 5470,000
l3 14 Meridian Ave Bike Facilities South Bike/Ped/Safety 16 St Dade Blvd 0.47 Phase I feasibility analysis,Phase If Implementation 575,000 53,320,000 53,395,000 Large Proj 80% $2,716,000
), 15 Shared Use Path-Meridian Ave&28 St Middle Bike/Ped Dade Bled Pine Tree Dr 0.90 Shared use path(lane repurposing)Enhanced crosswalks $75,000 $343,000 5118,000 100% $0
in
16 Protected bike lane-La Gorce Dr/Pine Tree Dr Middle Bike/Ped 51 St Lu Gorce Cir 2.69 Protected/buffered bike lanes(Lane repurposing(BPMP Page 158 $1,068,000 $21,360,000 522,428,000 Other Funds 50% $11,214,000
17 6 St&Michigan Ave Bike Facilities Analysis South bike/Ped West Ave SR A1A/2 St 0.50 Phase I Geometric analysis&feasibility,Phase II Implementation $50,000 550,000 100% 550,000
1a Intersection Impr.SR AIR&SR 907/Alton Rd South Bike/red n/a n/a n/a Enhanced crosswalks&Improved sidewalks 550.000 $50,000 100% 550,000
19 Dickens Ave&SR934/71 St Geometric change North Roadway n/a n/a n/a Feasibility study for geometric modifications to add SB lane $50,000 550,000 100% $0
20 SR AlA/MacArthur Cswy&SR A15/5 St-ASC South Roadway Fountain St Washington Ave 2.00 Feasibility study of adaptive signal control $15,000 $435,000 $450,000 Other Funds 70% $315,000
21 SR 907/Alton Rd Feasibility study of ASC South Roadway 6 St Michigan Ave 1.50 Feasibility study of adaptive signal control $15,000 $685,000 5700,000 Other Funds 70% $490,000
22 Complete Streets Feasibility Study-23 St South Multimodal Dade Blvd SR Ale/Collins 0.30 Feasibility study for complete streets 5100,000 5250,000 51,950,000 52,300,000 Large Proj 80% $0
23 SR AlA/Indian Creek Dr Bike/Ped/Safety Impr. Middle Roads ray 2651 :SR 112/415t 0.90 Safety Improvements $15,000 $95,000 $110,000 100% $110,000
24 SR AlA&63 St&Abbott Ave Feasibility Study North Roadway Oa n/a n/a Feasibility Study of Intersection Improvement $50,000 $50,000 100% $0
25 SR 907/Alton Rd&43 St feasibility Study Middle Roadway n/a n/a n/a Feasibility Study of Intersection Improvement 550.000 550,000 0% 50
26 Safety Impr.-SR 934/71 St&Normandy Dr North Roadway N Shore Dr SR AlA/Colltns 0.50 Safely Improvement 550,000 550,000 0% $0
27 SR 112/Julia Tuttle Cswy feasibility study Middle Multimodal USI/Biscayne SR 907/Alton Rd 3.18 Feasibility study of shared path/protected bike lanes/exclusive bus lanes $100,000 5110,000 52.400.000 $2,610,000 Other Funds 50% $1,305,000
28 Neighborhood Greenway-85 St North Bike/Ped Stillwater Dr Atlantic Trail 0.50 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 550,000 575,000 51,081,000 51,206,000 50% $603,000
29 Trolley-Alton Rd/SR 117/5R AlA/Dade Bald Middle Transit various various 6.40 Trolley Route from Mt Sinai Medical Ctr to Mid and South Beach(oyer?) 55,100,000 Trolley 100% $5,300,000
30 SR AIA&Indian Creek Dr Signal Optimization North Roadway SR 907/63 ST SR 934/71 St 0.79 Signal optimization feasibility study on SR AlA 5100,000 5100,000 Other Funds 10% 510,000
31 SR 934/71 St feasibility study North Roadway Carlyle SR AlA/Collins 1.02 Feasibility study-removing left turns on 71 St&adding westbound lane $199.000 $199,000 Other Funds 0% 50
32 SR 112/41 St&SR 907/Alton Rd Auxiliary lane Middle Roadway n/a n/a n/a Feasibility study for axillary lane/shoulder lane 550,000 5100,000 $252,000 $402,000 City 0% $0
33 Middle Beach Intermodal Station Middle Multimodal n/a n/a n/a Develop an intermodal station for multimodal transfer $120,000 5360,000 54,095,000 $4,575,000 Other Funds 50% $2,287,500
34 SR 112/Julia Tuttle Cswy westbound ramp Middle Roadway Mt Sinai Hos. SR 112/Cswy 0.25 Westbound on ramp to SR 112/1ulia Cswy from Mt Sinai Hospital $50,000 $50,000 Other Funds 0% 50
35 Neighborhood Greenway-10 St/11 St South Bike/Ped West Ave SR AlA/Collins 052 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks $65,000 $165,000 $1,264,000 51,494,000 Large Proj 80% $1,195,200
36 Intersection Impr-SR 907/Alton&Michigan Avf Middle Bike/Ped n/a n/a n/a Provide enhanced crosswalks(FOOT project) 52,600,000 52,600,000 Other Funds 5% 5130,000
37 Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Middle Bike/Ped SR A1A/Blk 4700 SR Ale/Blk 5400 0.80 Connect North&South existing beach walk segments $533,520 $12,200,000 $12,733,520 Large Proj 30% 53,820,100
38 SR AlA/Collins&SR 112/41 St Safety Study Middle Roadway n/a n/a n/a Intersection safety study&improvements $50,000 550,000 City 100% $50,000
39 Neighborhood Greenway-81 St North Bike/Ped Crespi Blvd Atlantic Trail 0.36 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 50 545,000 $875,000 5920,000 Greenway 70% $644,000
40 Neighborhood Greenway-77 St North Bike/Ped Dickens Ave Collins Ave 0.28 Neighborhood greenway/Tratfir calming/Enhanced crosswalks $0 589,000 5685,000 $774,000 Greenway 70% $541,800
41 Tatum Waterway Dr Neighborhood Greenway North Bike/Ped 77 St 81 St 0.34 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 50 5830,000 5830,000 Greenway 70% $581,000
42 Chase Ave shared use path feasibility study Middle Bike/Ped Alton Rd 34 St 0.23 Phase I feasibility analysis,Phase II Implementation $30,000 $45,000 $104,322 $179,322 100% $179,300
43 Alton Rd/North Bay Rd Intersection bike Impr. Middle Bike/Ped n/a n/a n/a Intersection safety Improvements $50,000 $$0,000 100% 50
44 16 St Bike Facility Improvements South Bike/Ped Bay Rd Collins Ave 0.83 Phase I paint bike lane green,Phase II Implement protected bike lane 5100,000 5827,000 $927.000 100% 5927,000
45 Enhanced Bike Lane-47 St Middle Bike/Ped N Bay Rd Pine Tree Dr 0.66 Enhanced(green)bicycle Lane $210,000 5210,000 100% 50
46 Enhanced Bike lane-42 51 Middle Bike/Ped Prairie Ave Pine Tree Dr 0.25 Enhanced(green)bicycle Lane $150,000 5150,000 100% $0
47 Neighborhood Greenway-Bay Drive North Bike/Ped W 71 St E 71 St 1.30 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 5100,000 $100,000 $3,200,000 $3,400,000 Greenway 100% $3,400,000
48 Neighborhood Greenway-Royal Palm Ave Middle Bike/Ped 28 St 41 St 0.55 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks $50,000 585,000 5850,000 $915,000 Greenway 100% $985,000
49 Baywalk Shared Use Path South Bike/Ped S St 15 St 1.05 Feasibility study&implementation of a shared use path 531,000 541,000 5310,000 5382,000 100% $382,000
SO South Beach Ped Priority Zones(PPZ) South Bike/Ped :n/a n/a n/a Designation&formalization of Pedestrian Priority Zones(PPZ) $300,000 $300,000+ $1,500,000 52,100,000 Large Proj 100% $2,100,000
Total Potential Cost for PAorlty 1 Projects $12,990,000$7,011,520 $339,759,322 5365,060,842 13.9% $50,157,800
To 8110INy Fee Cwt for Morley 1•ll♦F Pre1ltta: 14.1% $121,6716500
Priority 2&3 Improvement Protects
No Priority 2 Project Names Location Type From To length Description feasibility Design Construction Total Cost Note %Mobility S Mobility
1 Exclusive transit&protected bike lane-17 St South Transit/Bike/Ped Washington Ave Collins Ave 0.14 Exclusive transit and/or protected bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen $116,230 $465,895 51,162,300 $1,744,425 Other funds 100% $1,744,400
2 Exclusive transit&protected bike lane-SR AlA South/Middle Transit/Bike/Ped 17 St 44 St 2.76 Exclusive transit and/or protected bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen $1,145,696 $9,184,771 $22,913,906 $33,244,373 Oher Funds 13% $4,155,500
3 Protected/Buffered Bike Lanes-Meridian Ave South/Middle Bike/Ped 16 St 28 St 1.04 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $366,466 $955,997 $7,329,312 $8,651,775 Major Proj 20% 51,730,400
4 Buffered Bike Lane.69 St North Bike/Ped Indian Creek Dr Collins Ave 0.20 Buffered bike lane $64,070 $183,846 $1,281400 $1,529,316 Large Proj 100% $1,529,300
5 Protected bike lane feasibility-21 St&22 55 South Bike/Ped Washington Ave Beachwalk 0.60 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks 5264,553 $345,068 $2,645,526 $3,255,147 Large Proj 60% $1,953,100
6 Protected/Buffered Bike Lanes-63 St Middle Bike/Ped N Bay Rd SR ALA/Indian 0.47 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $222,220 51,116,646 $2,222,198 53,561,064 Large Proj 60% 52,136,600
7 Exlusive transit/bike-SR 934/77 St/Normandy North Bike/Ped Bay Dr SR AlA/Collins 2.60 Exclusive transit and/or protected bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen $1,003,587 $7,335,939 $20,071,725 $28,411,251 Otter Funds 20% $5,682,300
8 Safety Study-SR 907/Alton Rd&SR 112/41 St North Bike/Ped SR 907/Alton Rd SR 112/41 St n/a Safely feasibility study $95,796 $95,796 Oher Funds 0% 50
9 Safety Study-SR 112/41 St&Plne Tree Dr North Bike/Ped SR 112/41 St Pine Tree Dr n/a Safety feasibility study $95,796 $95,796 Ober Funds 0% 50
10 Safety Study-44 St&SR AlA/Collins Ave Middle Bike/Ped 44 St SR ASA/Collins n/a Safety feasibility study $95,796 $95,796 Cher Funds 0% SO
11 Bicycle Greenway Analysis-Meridian Ave South Bike/Ped 1St 16 St 1.00 Neighborhood greenway/Traffic calming/Enhanced crosswalks 5242,987 $316,938 $2,429,864 $2,989,739 Large Pro} 50% 51,494,900
c12 Lincoln Rr Shared Space South Bike/Ped Washington Ave Collins Ave 0.12 Shared space with pavement changes Si multimodal accomodations $36,333 $315,932 $363,322 $715,587 100% $715,600
13 Bicycle Connection/Greeway-Lincoln Lane South Bike/Ped Alton Rd Washington Ave 0.57 Exploring typical section alts to create exclusive bike lane or greenways $138,503 $1.80,655 51,385,023 $1,704,181 Large Pro) 50% $852,100
14 Shared Use Path-Fairway Dr North Bike%Ped Biarritz Dr Bay Dr 1.10 Shared-use path adjacent to the golf course $32,466 $42,346 $324,653 5399,465 100% $399,500
2. Total Potential Cost for Priority 3 Project _ $3,920,499 $20,444,033 $62,129,229 $86,493,761 26% 522,393,700
oii
V No Priority 3 Project Names Location Type From To length Description feasibility, Design Construction Total Cost Note %Mobility S Mobility
1 Protected/buffered bike lanes-SR 414/Collins South Bike/Ped S Pointe Dr 17 St 1.68 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $591,983 $1,544,303 $11,839,657 $13,975,943 Oher Funds 13% $1,747,000
2 Neighborhood Greenway•Prarie Ave Middle Bike/Ped 44 St 47 St 0.25 Neighborhood greenway/Sharrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks $34,063 $44,430 $340,626 $419,119 80% 5335,300
3 Exclusive transit lanes-SR AlA/Collins Ave Middle Transit/Bike/Ped 44 5t SR 414/Collins/In 2.00 Exclusive transit lanes(lane repurposing) $338,945 $5,374,060 $6,778,900 $12,491,905 Oher Funds 13% $1,623,900
4 Exclusive Transit/Protected bike Lanes-SR AlA Middle/North Transit/Bike/Ped SR A1A/Coltns/Ir SR 934/71 St 2.05 Exclusive transit and protected bike lanes(lane repurpose or widen) $850,970 57,452,108 $17,019,387 $25,322,465 Oher Funds 10% $2,532,200
S Exclusive transit/protected bike-SR 934/79 st C5 North Transit/Bike/Ped US1/Biscayne B Bay Or 2.67 Exclusive transit/shared use path/protected bike In/repurpose or widen $1,378,742 $7,126,692 $27,674,824 $36,080,258 Oher Funds 13% 54,S10,000
6 Protected/buffered bike lane North Bfke/ped Indian creek Or 58934/71 St 0.30 Protected/buffered bike lane/lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $105,712 5276,769 $2,114,225 $2,495,706 Large Proj 70% $1,747,000
7 Shared path-77 St North Bike/Ped Normandy Ave Dickens Ave 0.24 Shared use path(lane repurpose or widen).Enhanced crosswalks $7,084 $9,240 $70,834 $87,158 100% $87,200
B Neighborhood Greenway-77 St North Bike/Ped Dickens Ave Atlantic Way 0.34 Neighborhood greenway/Sharrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks $23,163 $60,424 $463,251 $546,838 100% 5546,800
9 Neighborhood Greenway-81 St North Bike/Ped Tatum Waterway SR AlA/Collins 0.19 Neighborhood greenway/Sharrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks $12,944 $33,767 $258,876 5305,587 100% $305,600
10 Protected/buffered bike lane-S Pointe Or South Transit/Bike/Ped Alton Rd Beachwalk 0.31 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $109,235 $284,961 52.184,699 $2,578,595 Large Proj 50% $1,289,400
11 Exclusive Transit/Protected bike In-Alton Rd South Transit/Bike/Ped S Pointe Or SR A14/5 St 0.49 Exclusive transit and protected bike lanes(lane repurpose or widen) $181,526 $477,012 $3,630,502 $4,289,040 Oher Funds 13% $536,100
12 Exclusive Transit/Protected bike-Washington A South Transit S Pointe Or SR AlA/5 St 0.44 Exclusive transit and protected bike lanes(lane repurpose or widen) $163,003 $428,338 53,260,042 $3,851,383 80% 53.081,100
13 Venetian Cswy conventional bike lanes South Bike/Ped US 1/Biscayne B West Ave 3.21 Conventional bile lanes(lane repurpose or widen)Enhanced crosswalks $621,774 52,252,219 $16,435,476 519,509,469 Oher Funds 5% 5975,500
14 Exclusive transit lanes-SR 907/Alton Rd South Transit Dade Blvd SR 112/41 St 1.46 Exclusive transit lanes(Lane repurposing( 5893,994 52,342,493 $17,879,677 $21,116,364 Oher Funds 13% 52,639,500
15 Protected/buffer bike lane-24 St/Liberty Ave Middle Bike/Ped Pine Tree Dr 23 St/SR AlA/Col 0.28 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $98,664 $257,384 51,973,277 52,329,325 Large Proj 50% 51,164,700
16 Protected/buffer bike lane-Flamingo Dr Middle Bike/Ped Pine Tree Dr SR AlA/Indian 0.13 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $45,809 $119,500 $916,164 51,081,473 Large Proj 50% $540,700
17 Protected/buffer bike lane-24 St/Biarritz Dr Middle Bike/Ped Shore Lane SR 934/71 St 0-32 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks 5112,759 $294,153 $2,255,173 52,662,085 Large Proj 50% 51,331,000
18 Neighborhood greenway-Bay Dr North Bike/Ped Fairway Dr SR 934/71 St 0.34 Neighborhood greenway/Sparrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks 541,308 $107,759 $826,154 $973,221 Greenway 80% $780,200
19 Shared Path•Wayne Ave North Bike/Ped Raymond St 73 St 0.07 Shared path(lane repurpose or widen)&Enhanced crosswalks $2,066 $2,693 $20,660 525.421 100% 525,400
20 Shared Path-Wayne Ave North Bike/Ped Michael St 7S st 0.19 Shared path(lane repurpose or widen)&Enhanced crosswalks $5,608 $7,315 $56,077 $69,000 100% $69,000
21 Exclusive Transit/Protected bike In-Collin Ave Middle/North Transit SR A1A/Collins BB St 4.36 Exclusive transit lanes(Lane repurposing)&protected bike lane 51,809,867 $14,509,276 $36,197,330 $52,516473 Major Proj 13% 56,564,600
22 Neighborhood greenway-Hawthorne Ave North Bike/Ped 77 St 85 St 0.S4 Neighborhoodgreenway/Sharrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks $65,607 $171,147 $1,312,127 $1,548,231 Greenway 80% $1,239,100
23 Neighborhood greenway•85 St North Bike/Ped Hawthorne Ave SR AlA/Collins 0.46 Neighborhood greenway/Sbarrow markers/Enhanced crosswalks $55.887 $145,792 $1,117,738 51,319,417 Large Proj 60% 5791,700
24 Protected bike lane Middle Bike/Ped 23 St 51 St 2.00 Protected/buffered bike lane/Lane repurpose or widen/crosswalks $704,742 $1,838456 $14,094,830 $16,633,028 Major Proj 10% $1,663,800
25 Light rail connection/SR AlA/MacArthur Cswy South Tran.it/Blke/Ped US 1/Biscayne 6 SR 907/Alton Rd 3.41 light rail connection/protected bike lane/lane repurpose or widen $4,925,900 $14,777,698 $98,517,982 5118,221,580 Major Proj 0% $0
26 SR 112/41 St Exclusive transit&bike lanes Middle Tranat/Bike/Ped SR 907/Alton Rd beachwalk 0.87 Excluslve transit lanes(Lane repurposing)&protected bike lane $367,601 $1,027,830 57,352,009 $8,747,440 Major Proj 13% 51,093,400
27 Exclusive transit lane/Shared-SR 112/Julia Cswy Middle Multimodal US 1/Biscayne B SR 907/Alton Rd 3.18 Exclusive transit lanes&shared path-Requires extensive bridge work $3,882,675 $11,603,847 $77,653,494 $93,140,016 Major Proj 13% $11,642,500
28 Protected Bike Lane-SR AlA/Indian Creek North Bike/Fed Abbott Ave Dickens Ave 0.33 Protected bike lanes(repurposing or wodening) $116,283 $303,346 $2,325,647 $2,745,276 Major Proj 13% $343,200
29 Neighborhood greenway-1S St South Bike/Ped Washington Axe West Ave 0.66 Neighborhood greenway/bike blvd markers/Enhanced crosswalks $60,186 $209,180 $1,603,711 $1,893,077 Greenway 80% 51,514,500
30 Neighborhood greenway-20 St South Bike/Ped Purdue Ave Sunset Dr 0.25 Neighborhood greenway/bike blvd markers/Enhanced crosswalks $30,374 579,235 5607,466 $717,075 Greenway 80% 5573,700
31 Shared space-Ocean Dr South Bike/Ped 5 St 15 St 0.90 Shared space(public space for events and ped space)traffic calming 513,282 $34,647 $265,626 5313,555 100% 5313,600
32 Neighborhood greenway-Crespi Ave North Bike/Ped Hawthorne Ave 85 St 0.22 Neighborhood greenway/bike blvd markers/Enhanced crosswalks $26,729 $69,727 $534,571 $631,027 Greenway 80% $504,800
33 Neighborhood greenway•purdy Ave South Bike/Ped Dade Blvd 20 St 0.26 Neighborhood greenway/bikeblvd markers/Enhanced crosswalks $31,589 $82,404 $631,765 5745,758 Greenway 80% 5696,600
34 Neighborhood Greenway-Drexel Ave South Bike/Ped Espanola Way 17 St 0.40 Neighborhood greenway/bike blvd markers/Enhanced crosswalks 548,598 5126,776 $971,946 $1,147,320 Greenway 80% $917,900
Total Potential Cost for Priority 3 Project 517,978,672 573473,983 $359,084,923 $450,537,579 12% , 553,627,000
Total MaCBtty no Coss for PtiwNy I♦8♦81 Projects: 14.1% $126,878,500
Attachment N
Comprehensive Plan Revisions Needed Table
Page 1476 of 2557
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISIONS NEEDED K E I T H
:. . �� ...,., SCHNARS
FUTURE LAND USE
Policy 3.1 Innovative land use development patterns,including mixed uses shall continue V Consider revision in alignment with proposed parking
to be permitted and encouraged through the provision of LDR incentives such as reduction strategies
additional floor area when at least 25% of the total are of a building is
residential, and/ or shared parking for mixed commercial/office/residential in
areas designated as commercial in the Future Land Use Map
Policy 3.3 Off-street parking requirements may be waived for uses within existing buildings V Consider revision in alignment with proposed parking
in historic districts.In order to encourage the compatibility of new construction reduction strategies. Both mobility fees and fee in-lieu of
in historic districts, and the adaptive re-use of existing buildings outside of parking may be charged.
historic districts,off-street parking requirements may be satisfied through the
payment of a fee in-lieu of parking.
c Policy 3.4 Mixed use developments will continue to be encouraged in all areas designated Okay
as commercial/re!idential and MXE by c eating districts in the land development
regulations which are consistent with s.163.3202, F.S. and which will permit
combined hotel, residential and commercial developments in accordance with
Objective 1 of this Future Land Use Element.
Objective 6 Meet the concurrency management requirements of Ch.91-5.0055 FAC and the V Need to delete reference to 9J-5. Most of Objective 6 and the
LDR,and the land needs for utilities. Policies under it need to be removed.This could be where to
insert Mobility Fee policies in its place.
Policy 6.1 The City shall continue to participate in the Miami-Dade County impact fee V With the exception of the Transportation Impact Fee.
ordinance program.
Policy 6.2 Land Development Regulations pertaining to concurrency management shall be V Need to revise to delete 91.5, replace with 163 F.S. citation,
• amended to reflect Ch. 9J-5.0055 FAC and this policy. No development permit delete transportation concurrency management.
shall be issued unless the public facilities necessitated by the project(in order to
meet level of service standards specified in the Policies of the Transportation,
Recreation, Public Schools and Infrastructure Elements,and the Water Supply
Plan)will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development or the
permit is conditional to assure that they will be in place, but no later than the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The
requirement that no development permit shall be issued unless public facilities
necessitated by the project are in place concurrent with the impacts of
development shall be effective immediately:
Acceptable Level of Service Standards for public facilities in the City of Miami
Beach are:
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Nobility Fee 1
Policy 6.2 (continued) (f)Transportation Level of Service:
• Local roads—LOS Standard D
• Collector roads—LOS Standard D
• Arterial roads-LOS Standard D
• Limited access roads-LOS Standard D
1.Measuring Conformance with the Level-of-Service
(C)For Traffic:
1. Transportation facilities needed to serve new development are V Remove from concurrency
scheduled to be in place or un ier actual construction not more
than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent as provided in the adopted local government
v five-year schedule of capital improvements.
2. No modification of public facility level-of-service standards V Remove from concurrency
established by this plan shall be made except by a duly enacted
CO amendment to this plan.The City shall ensure that no development
° approvals are issued that would result in traffic volumes surpassing
f it the cumulative allowable areawide service volume based on the
sum of the individual roadways' Level of Service Standard within
the Transportation Concurrency Management Areas.
Roadways: The standard for measuring highway capacities shall be the V Remove TCMAs
Florida DOT Table of Generalized Two-Way Peak Hour Volumes for
Urbanized Areas or other techniques that are compatible to the maximum
extent feasible with FDOT standards and guidelines.The measurement of
capacity may also be determined by engineering studies provided that
analysis techniques are technically sound and acceptable to the City.The
City shall ensure that no development approvals are issued that would
result in traffic volumes surpassing the cumulative allowable areawide
service volume based on the sum of the individual roadways' Level of
Service Standard within the Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas.
3. Capacity Reservation: V Remove from concurrency,9J-5
Any developmen' permit application •rhich includes a specific plan for
development, ircluding densities ar d intensities, shall require a
concurrency review. Compliance will be finally calculated and capacity
reserved at time of final action of an approved final Design Review
approval or building permit if no Design Review is required or enforceable
developers agreement. Phasing of development is authorized in
accordance with Rule 91.5.0055. Applications for development permits
shall be chronologically logged upon approval to determine rights to
available capacity. A capacity reservation shall be valid for a time to be
specified in the land development code; if construction is not initiated
during this period,the reservation shall be terminated.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 2
a Bii. E4 IIS" 1111 a".;:MIF= n.* ' = .. ,i I INIMI 'I g:
Policy 6.2 (continued) S Project Impact or Demand Measurement: V Remove Transportation from concurrency
The concurrency management user's procedural guide(a supplement to
the land development code) will contain the formulas for calculating
compliance plus tables which provide generation rates for water use,
sewer use, solid waste and traffic, by land use category. Alternative
methods acceptable to the Director may also be used by the applicant_
For example, traffic generation may be based upon the Institute of
Transportation Engineer's "Trip Generation" manual. Transportation
facilities needed to serve new development shall be in place or under
actual construction within 3 years after the local government approves a
building permit or its functional equivalent.
Policy 12.1 The Miami Beach Sustainability Plan shall be the guiding document Okay.Will revise with overall Comp Plan revisions to add policies that
(Strategic Plan) that provides structure and focus to policies and continue to implement & enforce ban of polystyrene, enforcement of
to
initiatives in order to successfully enhance community sustainability. ban on unencapsulated floating docks,platforms and buoys. 2010 plan:
0) http://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/environmental-
sustainability/sustainability/sustainability-programs/sustainability-plan/
• TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Goal:It shall be the goal of the City of Miami Beach to provide,maintain Okay
and improve a sustainable,safe,convenient and energy efficient multi-
modal transportation system which:
• Is focused on the mobility of people,not merely vehicles.
• Is coordin:ted with the City's Lard Use Element.
• Is multi-modal as it recognizes and promotes alternative modes of
transportation including: automobile, public transportation,
bicycle and pedestrian, as well as levels of service and parking
needs.
• Is consistent with sustainable and environmentally friendly growth
management principles.
• Is coordinated with the regional transportation network and other
governmental agencies.
• Balances the needs of all current and future users.
• Ensures the economic vitality of the businesses within the City.
• Enhances the quality of life for the City's neighborhoods residents.
Objective 1 To provide for a safe,convenient,balanced,efficient and effective multi- Okay. Objective 1 and the Policies under it mostly reference TCMAs
modal transportation system with a Level of Service (LOS) for multiple and concurrency,and should be removed.This could be where to Insert
transportation modes. Mobility Fee policies In its place.
Policy 1.1 The following minimum Level of Service standards shall apply to all State, Okay.(see next page)
County and local roads except for designated Federal Interstate Highway
System (FIRS), Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), and Transportation
Regional Incentive Program (TRIP)(please see Glossary of terms)funded
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 3
facilities which shall be subject to the Florida Department of
Transportation's(FOOT)Level of Service Standards.
•, qtr~ .... ..;a° la:._ -' ! � � E .. d �' •
Policy 1.1(continued) • Local roads—LOS Standard D I don't expect this to change unless the planned projects can improve
LOS
• Collector roads—LOS Standard D
• Arterial roads-LOS Standard D
• Limited access roads-LOS Standard D
Policy 1.2 The following level of service standards shall be established for roadways V Delete TCMAs
with certain characteristics as per this policy, and for roadways located
within the City's Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
(TCMA's):
a. Where no mass transit service exists,roadways shall operate at or V Delete TCMAs
-u above LOS D;
• b. Where mass transit service having headways of 20 minutes or less
is provided within%mile distance,parallel roadways shall operate
o at no greater than 120 percent of LOS D;(please see glossary of
ro terms)
(moi, c. Where extraordinary transit service classified as Local Circulator or
express or peak-hour limited stop bus service having headways of
10 minutes exists,parallel roadways within 1/4 mile,shall operate
at no greater than 150 percent of LOS 0(please see glossary of
terms).
Policy 1.3 The City shall ensure that no development approvals are issued that V Remove concurrency,delete TCMAs
would result in traffic volumes surpassing the cumulative allowable
areawide service volume based on the sum of the individual roadways'
Level of Service Standard within the Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas.
Policy 1.5 Roadway level of service is insufficient as a measure of multi-modal V V This policy is what directed the mobility fee study.
mobility in a mature city with land use intensities, mixed uses and the Possibly revise this to reflect a review or revised study after another 10
economic vitality such as Miami Beach. The City shall undertake an years?
examination of total mobility by 2015 in an attempt to shift from roadway
capacity and level of service to an overall mobility system capacity and
level of service. This will require quantifying capacities and levels of
service for the physical roadway system, the transit network, the
pedestrian network and the bicycle network.The results will be used as a
guide for the planning and implementation of mobility improvements.
Objective 2 The City shall evaluate its transportation system as it relates to the land V Will revise with overall Comp Plan revisions
use element of this comprehensive ,'lan in an effort to encourage
commercial development which is mixed use,multi-modal in nature and
which ultimately enhances mobility.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 4
Policy 2.2 Impact of Land Use Changes on the Multi-Modal System
The City shall assess the impacts of future land use changes on the overall
transportation system,including roadway,transit,bicycle and pedestrian
levels of service.
Policy 2.3 Transit Oriented Design(TOD)By 2015,the City shall examine the type of Have TOD guidelines been created? Revise date if not. (searched online
incentives and create design guidelines for TODs within the City. and did not find anything)
Policy3.4 The City shall plan, design and construct roadway projects and provide Okay
approval for commercial roadway projects that minimize consumption of
non-renewable resources,limit consumption of renewable resources to
sustainable yield levels, reuse and recycle its components,and minimize
the use of land and production of noise. To this end, the City shall
integrate multimodal transportation facilities to reduce reliance on
automobiles through initiatives such as:
• Expansion of the South Beach Local Circulator, including route Remove/revise reference to 2015(bicycle racks)
W
changes to incorporate Belle Island and the Cultural Campus, Revise bike rental program stats
which will further integrate multimodal transportation facilities
with various neighborhoods and provide linkages to commercial The north beach circulator and neighborhood greenway network
centers,recreational amenities and cultural assets projects are listed in the Mobility Fee priority projects,supported by this
• A North Beach Circulator by continuing to work with Miami-Dade policy.
Transit to finalize the implementation of this service
• Expansion of the Atlantic Greenway Network by continued
negotiation with property owners along the Atlantic Ocean and
along Biscayne Bay.
• Bicycle rack installations to provide safe and secure bicycle
parking for bicyclists in Miami Beach. By the end of 2015 it is
estimated that approximately 500 bicycle racks will be installed in
safe, conv.nient location along :ommercial corridors, residential
areas and public facilities. Bicycling as an alternative form of
transportation will increase the quality of life for our community
by reducing traffic congestion.
• Bicycle rental program —The City already started this program
with a proposal to install up to 85 kiosks of approximately 16 bikes
per kiosks. The benefits of this program include reduced traffic
congestion,improved air quality,quieter and more livable streets
and the opportunity for citizens to improve their health through
exercise.
• Shared car program will allow for the short term access to vehicles
by residents and visitors reducing the need for vehicle ownership
and encouraging the use of alternative modes of transportation.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 5
'2 :'~ .- °ii'"1: .. T .:dl T.:. lN!!IF C,.{: ._{F,t111110T_:.,3► a..... w.:G�-1FI6I$14341M _. MININVOv :i
Policy 4,1 The City shall maintain consistency with the transit level of service V The two studies cited are dated 2007...Believe they are replaced by the
standard of Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Plan Within this planning 2017 Transportation Master Plan.
period the City will continue to perform studies which examine the use of
Bus Rapid Transit, street cars, preemptive traffic signals and any other Were there studies performed re:BRT,street cars,technology?
technologies appropriate for Miami Beach. The City shall continue to
follow the guidelines and standards as outlined in recent planning studies
such as the Coastal Communities Transportation Management Plan and
the Coastal Communities Transit Study.
Policy 4.2 The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade Transit by 2012 so that the J What is the status of this?
minimum peak hour mass transit level of service standards provided Revise date or details. Possibly revise the date to require additional
within the City shall be done with public transit service having no greater collaboration 5-10 years from now.
-a than 30 minute headways and an average route spacing of % mile How long are the headways currently?
provided that:
p 1. The average combined population and employment density along How many people&employees per square mile in the service area?
CO the corridor between the existing transit network and the area of
expansion exceeds 4,000 people per square mile,and the service
cNNn corridor is 1/2 mile on either side of any necessary new routes or
route extensions to the area of expansion;
2. It is estimated that there is sufficient demand to warrant the
service;and
3. The service is economically feasible.
Policy 4.4 The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade Transit to provide enhanced Should be okay as is,continue to coordinate with MDT.
transit amenities, such as bus shelters, intermodal facilities, buses,
implementation of bus rapid transit (BRT) along(please see glossary of
terms) selected corridors, real time transit location information at
shelters and at intermodal terminals,more comfortable bus seating,and
passenger amenities,etc.
Policy 4.5 The City shall continue to coordinate with the MDT to construct Should be okay as is,continue to coordinate with MDT.
intermodal transit facilities to serve transportation uses, which shall
include the South Beach Local and Miami-Dade Transit buses,and other
means of transportation that may be available in the future; and the
intermodal transit centers to be located in North Beach and South Beach.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 6
_ �_
r
Policy4.6 .:,_ .Development approval for sites located on main thoroughfares within If the mobility fee have an impact on Fair share contributions in lieu of
existing transit routes shall be required where appropriate,to construct a easement dedication", we can address this in the mobility fee
concrete pad and dedicate an easement to Miami Beach or Miami-Dade ordinance.
Transit (or its successor agencies)for public transit uses.The dedicated
easement shall be of sufficient size to allow for American with Disabilities
Act(ADA)access to transit and for future shelter placement. Fair share
contributions in lieu of easement dedication may be granted when an
existing bus shelter or pad is located within Y.mile from the proposed
development on the same side of the roadway. Appropriate bus stop
facility locations shall be determined by analyzing the existing need on
established routes and assessing the existing built environment such as
-10 the width of the sidewalk,the presence of a sidewalk and/or the location
of any existing structures. Bus routes with the highest ridership and
located on an existing bike route will be the highest priority for facility
0.
placement.
Policy 4.7 The City shall plan, design, seek funding for and implement local V Mobility fee can fund the capital costs associated with this,but maybe
circulator systems in North Beach and Middle Beach. not the operating costs. From Transportation Master Plan,there will be
4 loops: South Beach (in operation), Alton-West, Middle Beach, and
Collins Link.The 3 original circulators are aligned with the 3 TCMAs,but
TCMA's are going away.The others are on the Mobility Fee Project List.
Policy 4.8 Coastal Communities Transit Plan a,c,and e As with 4.1,there is reference to 10 year old plan/study. Believe this is
The City shall work with Miami-Dade Transit to implement relevant replaced by the 2017 Transportation Master Plan.
recommendations included in the Coastal Communities Transit Plan.This Reference to the Circulator routes should be updated too. (noted
study is a detailed analysis of transit ridership to recommend efforts above)
focused on providing express service along the AIA corridor, while
providing local service via circulator systems in North Beach, Middle
Beach, and South Beach,all connected by intermodal transfer facilities.
More specifically this study made recommendations including but not
limited to:
a.Implementing non capital projects using existing resources
b. Implementing express routes using existing bus resources along the
AlA corridor
c.Implementing circulators to complement the AlA express routes.
i. Both the North Beach and Middle Beach circulators could be
reconfigured from existing MDT routes
ii. The South Beach Local could be extended from existing MDT
routes
d.Develop transfer stations and intermodal centers to connect the routes
TE-11 Transportation Element
e. Determine the initial capital requirements for a BRT System on Miami
Beach
f.Enhance MDT east/west routes from existing MDT routes
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 7
. ',,, 4: :,.".)p»..:aa.. .�. r °e►:. Y: Y�Ine �� NE!(!t r' r
Policy 4.9 The City shall continue to coordinate with MDT to ensure that transit V Need to revise to reflect TCMAs going away
service within the South Beach, Middle Beach and North Beach TCMA's
maximize mobilit"and reflects routes vOich serve to facilitate movement
within the City,w file preserving the historic character of the community.
Policy 4.11 The City encourages MDT and the Metropolitan Planning Organization V What is the status of this?
(MPO)to study the feasibility of a connecting Miami Beach by transit to
the Airport and Downtown Miami.
Policy 5.4 The further development of thoroughfares shall consider the creation, V As with 4.1,there is reference to 10 year old plan/study.
extension and improvement of bicycle lanes,paths,boulevards,and other Revise regarding complete streets efforts.
bicycle facilities as an effort to develop"complete streets."The City will
continue to follow the guidelines and standards as outlined in recent
planning studies such as the Coastal Communities Transportation
-13 Management Plan.
CD Policy 5.7 The City shall undertake specific evaluation of individual intersections in Y Utilize the term"Pedestrian Priority Zone"to modernize the policy,and
an attempt to determine if vehicular or pedestrian priority is needed,so indicate that evaluations and treatments may extend past the
that the appropriate intersection treatments can be implemented. All intersection(a zone,not just an intersection treatment).
intersections should be outfitted with pedestrian-friendly amenities
including,but not limited to:countdown pedestrian signals,high visibility
pedestrian crosswalks, and/or crosswalk lighting as appropriate and
pedestrian-oriented treatments. These treatments maximize pedestrian
safety by utilizing design strategies that mitigate the impact of high-
volume traffic and enhance roadway safety for pedestrian crossings. In
the commercial districts for commercial uses the strategies include
locating buildings at all intersection corners close to the street to provide
a perception of enclosure and safety for pedestrians, clearly striping
cross-walks and using different paving materials,as well as reducing the
distance between curb corners to reduc pedestrian crossing distance.
Policy 5.8 The City shall con:inue the implementation of the Beachwalk and Baywalk V Are these projects completed or included in the most up to date
Projects in order to further the City's vision of having a continuous on- Transportation Master Plan or Bike/Ped Plan? If completed,delete.
grade recreational path running north/south along the coast linking the
City's South, Middle and North Beach Neighborhoods. Such Projects
would combine to form one interconnected recreational path that is ADA
accessible and environmentally compatible with the dune and marine
environment.
Objective 6 The City shall continue to support and promote multiple modes of Okay
transportation by considering Transportation Demand Management
(TOM), Transportation Systems Management (TSM), and other
techniques.
Policy 6.1 Through the site plan review process, the City shall educate the Okay
development community and encourage appropriate TSM strategies to
improve the mobility systems efficiency, effectiveness and safety.These
may include but are not limited to:
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 8
• Traffic management and traffic monitoring programs '1 Consider changing language(5'h and 6'h bullets)after parking reduction
strategies are adopted.
• Incident management
• Congestion management
• Access management
• Parking policies which discourage single-occupancy vehicles
Policy 6.1(continued) • The encouragement of carpools,vanpools or ridesharing See note above,
• Programs or projects that improve traffic flow,including projects
to improve signalization
• On road bicycle lanes, bicycle parking, and bicycle amenities at
commercial and residential uses
• Improve intersections, and implement Intelligent Transportation
m Systems(ITS)strategies,including Pedestrian oriented intersection
design strategies
• Pedestrian countdown signals
Al Policy 6.2 Through the sit.i plan review procE ss, the City shall educate the Okay
cn
development community and encourage appropriate TDM strategies to Include the use of Mobility fee funds to promote these strategies(via
improve the mobility systems efficiency,effectiveness and safety.These marketing campaigns)in the Mobility fee ordinance.
may include but are not limited to efforts to reduce the dependence on
single-occupant vehicle trips, and the encouragement of the use of
bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes as a means of commuting and
recreational mobility.These may include,but are not limited to:
• carpools, Okay
Include the use of Mobility fee funds to promote these strategies(via
• • van pools, marketing campaigns)in the Mobility fee ordinance.
• demand response service,
• paratransit services(for special needs population),
• public/private provision of transit service, bike sharing,or shared
car initiatives,
• provision of short term and long term bicycle parking, showers
and changing facilities
• provision of parking for carpools
• alternative hours of travel, including flexible work hours,
staggered work shifts, compressed work weeks and
telecommuting options,
• subsidy of transit fares,
• used of long term parking to be developed at City's entry points,
• shared vehicular and pedestriar access for compatible land uses,
where possible,
• shared parking agreements for compatible land uses, where
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 9
possible,
• provision of transit amenities,
• car share vehicle
vehicle parking.
. Irb .. J � Am- rTT
N ,,11„ . Ar: � i W „n....rin , wo—ric
l
Policy 6.3 The City shall coordinate with and support FDOT in the pursuit of V What is the status of this? Have any of the ITS methods been
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), to help manage congestion on implemented yet? If ITS is fully implemented,revise this policy to refer
facilities within Miami Beach as well as those facilities connecting the City to continuing to add to the system with technology improvements.
with the mainland transportation system.This may include using various If ITS is only partially implemented,revise to refer to completion of ITS
forms of technology,not limited to ca,neras, and electronic signage,to integration at all intersections.
inform travelers of the condition of the transportation system, roadway
level of service,and availability of parking citywide.
Policy 6.4 The City shall attempt to better balance the mode split between V Remove the last sentence("In the meantime...")
automobiles and alternative modes of transportation, such as bicycling May need to revise to reflect the Mode Share(existing)and Mode Share
and transit,particularly in the morning,afternoon and evening peak hour Vision established in the Transportation Master Plan, as noted in the
periods. In the meantime,the City will use the MPO's regional model to mobility fee technical memo.
m establish the modal split within the City.
oPolicy 6.5 By 2015,the City shall undertake an analysis that determines the baseline V This analysis was done in the Transportation Master Plan. Regular•e-
uN, mode split,then set a target mode split to be achieved in a certain period analysis is recommended,therefore change the"2015"date.
of time.
Policy 6.6 The City shall examine the feasibility of developing a transportation trust V Mobility fee will establish a fund for projects. This policy has been
fund in which to invest its revenue generated via taxes or development achieved.
fees, etc.and which will be earmarked towards the implementation of
scheduled transportation improvements, in coordination with long term
master planning efforts.
Policy 6.7 As a method of achieving a balance between an efficient and effective V V Will not need this policy after Mobility Fee is established.
level of service and an adequate mode split, by 2015, the City shall
examine placing a higher priority on the development and Could be replaced by a policy that refers to utilizing the mobility fee
implementation of alternative mode projects, than it would on physical (fund)to finance alternative mode projects.
capacity projects.A method of doing so may be to spend an increased
percentage of City transportation funds,taken from all sources,on transit
or alternative mode projects in lieu of physical capacity projects.
Policy 6.8 As part of the pla n review and approva'process,the City shall negotiate V If the City wants to see these improvements paid for by the new
with applicants for necessary improvements and enhancements on the Mobility Fee, include reference to that in the Ordinance. Otherwise
private property,such as,but not limited to,dedications or easements for continue to negotiate with applicant for upfront enhancements.
transit bus stops as part of the City's multimodal network.
Policy 6.9 The City will work to reduce conflicts among various modes of Okay
transportation.This shall be done through:
a. Establishment of enhanced intersections with more pedestrian- Okay
friendly and safe crosswalks with enhanced signage;
b. The development of bike paths and lanes with bollards and raised
islands to increase safety at intersections by preventing vehicles
from entering special lanes.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 10
-i��`"ii�l�1 -�:IN -'r iX - "r,d ::I c_F.•S>d „'P i. II -ti 'r." a w ` - w'
Policy 6.10 Awareness Mobility Options J Revise to remove reference to TCMA's. Otherwise the concept of
To improve citizen and visitor awareness of mobility options within the awareness shall remain, especially as more facilities for alternative
South Beach, Middle Beach and North Beach TCMA's, the City shall modes of travel are funded.
establish mechanisms to highlight information regarding the availability
of mobility options.
Policy 6.11 Through the site plan review process, the City shall educate the J Revise to remove reference to TCMA's
development community and promote TSM and/or TDM strategies and
incentives to use alternate modes of transportation (such as parking
policies and provision of intermodal transfers), that will accomplish
mobility within and through each transportation concurrency
management area.
Policy 6.12 The City shall promote alternate transportation modes and implement J J Remove 91-5 and TCMAs
-v the transit, pedestrian, bicycle and other modes of transportation
pursuant to F.A.C.91-5 in Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
as follows:
co
a. Continue implementing the projects in the"Bike Master Plan" in V a. What is the status of these projects? Update if already
the Capital Improvement Program{CIP)prioritizing those projects complete.
vwhere there are gaps on the bicycle and pedestrian network, b. Replace/revise with"Transportation Master Plan"
Current priority CIP funded projects include the Beach Walk Phase
II,and Middle Beach Recreation Corridor—Phase I Pedestrian Bike
Path.
b. Continue supplementing the MMP Project Bank with projects
from "Coastal Communities Trdnsit Master Plan" These, upon
approval,would be added to the CIP.
c. Continue coordination with Miami-Dade Transit to implement the V c. "CIP-funded"may change, projects may be funded by Mobility
Middle and North Beach Circulators.Current priority CIP funded Fee moving forward. Update regarding status of North Beach
projects include the North Beach Intermodal Center. project.
d. Continue improving multimodal infrastructure including d. "CIP-funded" may change,projects may be funded by Mobility
pedestrian and bicycle pathways, secure bicycle parking, transit fee moving forward.
shelters, and transit amenities including bike racks on buses.
Through the land development code and site plan review process,
the City will continue providing amenities and incentives to
alternate modes of transportation. Current priority CIP funded
projects include the installation of crosswalks, curb ramp
installation/maintenance and pedestrian countdown signals in
various locations throughout Miami Beach.
e. Implementing projects that accommodate all users of the
transportation system, including pedestrians, bicyclists, users of
mass transit, people with disabilities, the elderly, motorists,
freight providers,emergency responders,and adjacent land users.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 11
G . ,M ,ia....�.h4 . .a w 6 "12 3 if �i, , •„ .• Y «. :^ 7� j . �X :,. lkle I E
Policy 6.13 The City shall coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation V I believe the 2017 Transportation Master Plan supersedes the Coastal
and Miami-Dade County,to implement relevant recommendations of the Communities Plan.
Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan. This study is a sub
regional multi-modal transportation master plan,which used extensive
public involvement combined with a state of the art origin and
destination study to recommend efforts in the areas of capacity,
corridors, alternative modes and policies, in short term, mid term and
long term time frames.
Policy 6.14 Transportation Planning Y Revise regarding Transportation Master Plan
The City shall treat its Municipal Mobility Plan,its Coastal Communities
Transportation Master Plan, and its AGN as living documents, which
should be updated on a regular basis. The City is currently using the
Municipal Mobility Plan and the Coa'tal Communities Transportation
n Master Plan as a basis for capital budgeting and transportation planning
(11
efforts. In the next five years the City shall initiate a transportation
co master plan that will be a living document, updated on a regular basis,
and will guide all capital budgeting and transportation planning efforts.
NI
Policy 7.12 The City shall consider all aspects of the "Complete Streets" initiative Okay
when considering improvements to public rights of way.Complete streets
are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including
pedestrians,bicyclists,motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities,
so that they can safely move along and across the right of way no matter
what mode is being used.In doing so all roadway projects shall provide
for appropriate widths for sidewalk or bicycle facilities where right of way
is available. The City and reviewing agencies shall ensure that the new
construction projects are safe for both the user and the community and
that the project adds a lasting value to both motorized and nonmotorized
users.
Objective 9 The City shall maintain the North Beach, Middle Beach and South Beach V Mobility fee will replace transportation concurrency.
Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA's) within its
boundaries. The boundaries of these TCMA's shall be depicted on Map
9.1. Within these areas, increased multi-modal mobility options will be
pursued and redevelopment efforts will be focused.
Policy 9.1 Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) rely on the v Mobility fee will replace transportation concurrency.
measurement of capacity on an Areawide basis. As such the following
facilities will have their service volume:averaged at the approved Level
of Service,as the zalculation of Areawidi!capacity.
Policy 9.2 The City shall review ail proposed developments for their impact upon V Mobility fee will replace transportation concurrency.
the adopted LOS standards. Each development will be subject to the 9J-5 reference.
City's Concurrency Management System. The City will continue to
monitor the existing Transportation Concurrency Management Areas and
continue to implement multimodal opportunities pursuant to the Florida
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 12
Administrative Code,(F.A.C.sec,9J-5).
wry.! nw m
Policy 9.3 The City shall have the ability to mitigate the impact of a proposed V Mobility fee will replace transportation concurrency.
development on individual roadways,segments of roadways,or areas as
a whole within a Transportation Concurrency Management Areas,even if
Areawide service volumes are not surpassed, by collecting a
proportionate fair share contribution `rom a developer in accordance
with applicable sr ctions of Florida Statues.
Policy 9.4 When areas are deficient in capacity, the City may issue development V Mobility fee replacing fair share contribution.
orders when transportation concurrency requirements are satisfied by a
proportionate fair share contribution from a developer in accordance
with applicable sections of Florida Statutes.Regardless of concurrency or
mitigation, the City maintains the right to reject development for non
compliance with any other aspect of the Comprehensive Plan or Land
Development Regulations.
CO Policy 9.5 Within each Transportation Concurrency Management Area, infill and V Mobility fee will replace transportation concurrency.
o redevelopment shall be encouraged which is supportive of mobility
alternatives including walking, bicycling and use of transit, particularly
those associated with the completion of the Beachwalk and Baywalk
projects.
Policy 9.6 The City, shall implement the recommendations included in the City's V TCMAs going away.There is a newer parking study.
parking management study within the City's TCMA's. The process shall
evaluate:
a. Placement of future public and private parking facilities related to V (b) KRIS prepared a list of parking reduction strategies which are
the support of alternative modes of transportation; Included in deliverables.Depending on City's approach,several
b. Reduction of on-site parking requirements within the City's land of those strategies can be included as LDR policies (to be
development regulations in order to encourage multi-modal use; identified in LDRs)
c. Commercial delivery issues including the provision of loading
zones within alleys to improve street flow and emergency vehicle
access.
Policy 9.7 Concurrency mitigation fees within the City's TCMA's shall be used where V Mobility Fees to replace Concurrency mitigation fees and TCMAs.
appropriate to support multi-modal options.This process shall address: Change terminology only.
a. Contribution towards the construction of park and ride facilities to V a. Mobility fees may be used for this.
be served by transit; b. Add to the list: "inclusion of shade trees at intersections for
b. The construction of enhanced pedestrian amenities that create a pedestrians"
pedestrian friendly environment,such as:
• narrower traffic lanes,
• median refuges,curb extensions("bulb-outs"),
• count-down pedestrian signals,
• use of geometric designs that minimize crossing distances and
increase visibility between pedestrians and motorists,
• timing signals to minimize pedestrian delay&conflicts;
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 13
c. The construction of bicycle facilities and/or the evaluation of
reclaiming street space for other uses through the use of
complete streets concepts. �-..� g
Policy 9.8 Within the City's TCMA's, the City shall require all new major V TCMAs going away
developments, (those projects over 50,000 gross square feet, and/or
projects that increase the number of trips over 100 peak hour trips),to
submit a Transportation Mitigation Plan which will include strategies to
mitigate the traffic generated by the site,and will encourage the use of
alternative modes of transportation.The safety and convenience of all
users of the transportation system including pedestrians, bicyclists,
transit users, and motor vehicle drivers shall be accommodated and
balanced in all types of transportation and development projects and
through all phases of all new major developments so that the most
vulnerable—children,elderly,and persons with disabilities—can travel
CD
safely within the public right of way.Applicable treatments may include,
but not be limited to TOM strategies included in Policy 6.2 and TSM
N, policies included in Policy 6.1.
V1 Policy 9.9 The City will continue to utilize funding mechanisms the MPO planning V Revise to reflect mobility fee and delete reference to TCMA.
process, and continual updating of a concurrency mitigation bank to
support the projects contained within the City's long term planning
documents whicl.address mobility Opti ins.Those projects located within
the City's TCMA's and which are alternative modes should receive funding
priority.
Policy 9.10 Transportation concurrency within the South Beach, Middle Beach and V TCMAs going away
North Beach TCMA's will be maintained and tracked by the
Transportation and Concurrency Management Section located within the
Public Works Department.
Policy9.11 The City shall update the traffic counts in the Concurrency Management V Concurrency Management being replaced, but counts may still be
System every two years.This data shall be used as part of the update of necessary...Possibly just update terminology.
the long range transportation master planning process.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Objective 4 Continue to coordinate with local (adjacent municipalities), county, okay
regional and state entities in the establishment of Level of Service
Standards for public facilities.
Policy 4.1 Utilize the FDOT"Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual,"as okay
updated from time to time, in concurrency reviews of projects on State
roads and otherwise continue to ensure that the level of service
standards for public facilities are coordinated with those governmental
entities having operational maintenance responsibility for such facilities.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 14
- i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ELEMENT
Policy 1.5 When budgeting capital expenditures,the City will evaluate and assign V Capital expenditures vs mobility fee revenue—may need to revise what
priority to projects according to the following criteria,listed in order of fees are paying for,address in Mobility Fee ordinance.
importance:
1.Elimination of existing or impending public hazards;
2.Repair or replacement of damaged capital facilities which do not fit the
definition in Number 1 above;
3. Prevent service from any existing part of a system from falling below
the level of service standards established in this Comprehensive Plan,due
to failure of any component of the system;
4.Accommodate existing,expanding or new capital facilities within Miami
Beach which are provided by other governmental agencies so as to avoid
needless repetition of expenditures;
5. Accommodate new construction or rehabilitation projects which are
approved by the City pursuant to all applicable development regulations
and which are consistent with the elements of this comprehensive Plan
and its amendments, specifically to include projected growth patterns,
level of service standards,and requirements for financial participation by
the party seeking development approval in meeting the costs of the
capital facility;
6.Elimination of existing capacity deficits;
7.The project's impact on the local budget;
8.The project's financial feasibility within the City's budget;and
9.The project,if applicable,shall be coordinated with DOT plans.
Policy 1.7 The city shall limit the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt okay
Objective 3 Continue to participate in the Miami-Dade County Development Impact V Remove"transportation"from list- mobility fee to replace impact fee
Fee Program to secure a financial contribution from any development
that necessitates new or expanded potable water, sanitary and storm
sewer,tsansportatIon,and solid waste based on a proportional share of
the cost of the improvements.
Policy 3.1 The City will not give development approval to any new construction, V Add reference to transportation being separate, or list out potable
redevelopment or renovation project which creates a need for new or water,sanitary and storm sewer, and solid waste(in other words, list
expanded public capital improvements unless the project pays a only those improvements still under the Impact Fee Program).
proportional share of the costs of these improvements in accordance with
the Development Impact Fee Program.
Policy S.2A The following lezel of service standards shall be established for the V Delete or revise regarding reference to TCMAS
roadways identified below and located within the City's Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas(TCMAs):
a. Where no mass transit service exists,roadways shall operate at or Is any of this still relevant without TCMAs7
above LOS D;
b. Where mass transit service having headways of 20 minutes or less
is provided within Y.distance, parallel roadways shall operate at
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 15
no greater than 120 percent of LOS D;
c. Where extraordinary transit service classified as the Electrowave
shuttle or express or peak-hou limited stop bus service exists,
parallel rcadways within Y. mile shall operate at no greater than
150 percent of LOS D.
INFRASTRUCTURE Except as provided in Policy 6.2 through 6.5 below,the City shall not fund V Revise to reflect source of funds for transportation infrastructure
EXPENDITURES any public infrastructure capacity expansion if such funding and such
Policy 6.1 expansion would have the effect of directly subsidizing a private
development.
Policy 6.2 Notwithstanding Policy 6.1 above, the City may fund infrastructure V Revise to reflect source of funds for transportation infrastructure
capacity expansion to achieve:
1)adopted level-of-service standards for facilities which serve the current #4—will any of this still come out of city funds or mobility fee only?
and projected population; Is the limit of the location where#s 3-6 are limited to(south Pointe
2)recreational and natural resource enhancement; Redevelopment Area and the convention Center Village Redevelopment
3)any development directly supporting the Convention Center; Area) still in need?
4)amelioration of parking or mass transit deficiencies;
0 5)the provision of desirable parking or mass transit facilities and services;
and/or 6) redevelopment in redevelopment areas established in
accordance with state statute.
Expenditures pursuant to 3),4),5)and 6)preceding shall be limited to
south Pointe Redevelopment Area and the convention Center Village
Redevelopment Area as shown on the Redevelopment Areas Map
included with these goals,objectives and policies.
Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies for Mobility Fee 16
Attachment 0
Land Development Regulations Revisions Needed Table
Page 1493 of 2557
' 7 A L. KEITH('--;.r
-', , _l -1 1.., ; LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REVISIONS NEEDEDK .i
SCHNARS
Based on Code updated through October 17,2017(Municode)
Subpart 8-LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Y
Ch.114—General FMM►��iiii
Provisions
Sec.114-4 (61 No building shall be erected,converted,enlarged,reconstructed,moved,or Okay
Compliance with structurally altered,except in conformity with the off-street parking and loading
regulations required, regulations of the district in which the building is located.
(12)No building permit or board order shall be issued for any lot or site with a building Okay
LI
,o permit valued at$250,000.00 or more without a Construction Parking and Traffic
1D Management Plan approved by the Parking Director pursuant to 1, I, Article II,
A Division 3,entitled"Construction Management Plan."
g Ch.118—Admin&
Ce Review Procedures
V Sec.118-7 (j)Fee in lieu of providing required parking. Fee in lieu is a parking reduction strategy.
Fees for the (1)One-time fee in lieu of providing required parking. The parking fees are at the very end of this table, from
administration of land (2)Yearly payment fee In lieu of providing required parking. Appendix A—Fee Schedule.
development 118-7 is referenced in Appendix A,that it sets for the amount
regulations, of the fee,but there is no dollar amount provided here.
Sec.118-51 (11)To review the sale,exchange,conveyance or lease of ten years or longer of certain Likely okay, but in reference to traffic impact mitigation,
Powers and duties. city-owned property,as provided in City Charter,subsection 1 ''(b)3,entitled, mobility fee may replace that.
(Planning Board) "Alienability of property,"which requires approval by a majority(four-sevenths)vote of
all members of the planning board.In reviewing such an application,the planning board
shall consider the following review criteria,when applicable:
e.A traffic circulation analysis and plan that details the impact of projected traffic
on the immediate neighborhood and how this impact is to be mitigated.
Sec 118-163 (3)In reviewing a request for an amendment to these land development regulations,the V The fee could take the place of this consideration (as •
Review by Planning board shall consider the allowing when appiicablt: mitigation for congestion).
Board. h.Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic
congestion beyond the levels of service as set forth in the comprehensive plan or
otherwise affect public safety.
Sec.118-166.- Consideration of proposed amendments to the city's comprehensive plan by the planning V Not specifically related to Mobility Fee,but references to FAC
Amendment of board and city commission shall follow the procedures set forth in F.S.ch.163,F.A.C.chs. need to be amended(91-5)since 2011 changes.
comprehensive plan. 91-5 and 91-1]and the public participation procedures of the comprehensive plan and any
amendments thereto.
Sec.118-191-Review (a)Conditional uses may be approved in accordance with the procedures and standards V Parking reduction strategies may cause for a revision on(a)(5),
guidelines. of this article provided that: (b)(4)and(c)(4).
• (Conditional Use i5) Adequate off-street parking facilities will be provided. Mobility fee may cause for revision on(b)(7)and(c)(7).
Procedure)
(b) In reviewing an application for conditional use for new structures 50,000 square feet
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 1
�...L4s v +r:r • t"•�'.'
��
and over,the planning b Bard shall apply the following supplemental review guidelines
criteria in addition to the standard review guidelines listed in subsection a.above:
(4) Whether the proposed parking plan has been provided.including where and
how the parking is located,utilized,and managed,that meets the required parking and
operational needs of the structure and proposed uses.
(7) Whether a traffic circulation analysis and plan has been provided that details
means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood,addresses the impact of
projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood,traffic circulation pattern for the
neighborhood,traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials,and how these
impacts are to be mitigated.
(c) in reviewing an application for a religious institution,the planning board shall apply
m the following review criteria instead of the standard review guidelines listed in
ID subsection(a)above:
co
(4) Whether the proposed parking plan has been provided,including where and
N how the parking is located,utilized,and managed,that meets the required parking and
operational needs of the structure and proposed uses.
cn (7) Whether a traffic circulation analysis and plan has been provided that details
� means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood,addresses the impact of •
projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood,traffic circulation pattern for the
neighborhood,traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials,and how these
impacts are to be mitigated.
Sec.118-194.- (a) Through(1) V Add sub-paragraph(g)with language to require Mobility Fee
Compliance with payment by a certain point or the project approval expires.
conditions. (Cond.Use)
Sec.118-223.- (b) Evaluation criteria.A request for a transfer of development rights(unused floor V Will TDRS remain? Perhaps work it in to the mobility fee or
Procedures pertaining to area)shall only be approved if the planning board finds that the application is consistent mitigation fee.
the transfer of with the following mandatory criteria.
development rights (3) The project provides adequate off-street parking facilities,the enhancement or (c)(5)and{6)—as long as this still applies,it may not have to
(unused floor area). creation of view corridors either through the building(s)or within open space that is in
addition to the required setbacks. be revised.
(c) Development regulations.
(5) No more than 25 percent of the required parking shall be placed in a building on
a lot that received the transfer of development rights(unused floor area).
(6)If a garage is constructed on a transfer lot,it shall contain retail uses on the
ground floor elevation that faces Collins Avenue,Alton Road or Fifth Street.The
development regulations pertaining to parking lots and garages are set forth in
subsection
Sec.118-253.- (d) V Reference to traffic impact study/mitigation and TCMAs shall
Application for design (9) Provided certain minimum criteria as to gross square footage or floor area are be removed.
review. triggered as delineated under subsection a.,below.
A traffic circulation analysis and plan,prepared by a professional traffic engineer,
licensed and registered in the State of Florida,which details the impact of projected traffic
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility F se 2
on the immediate neighborhood and how this impact is to be mitigated,shall be required
in the following instances:
a.Within the City's Transportation Concurrency Management Areas(TCMA's),as
amended from time to time,all new development projects exceeding 5,000 gross square
feet.
b.for development projects that propose new floor area or an increase in floor area,
and are located within a half mile of any roadway segment with a level of service E or F,
as defined by the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual,as
amended from time to time.
c.The following shall be excluded from performing a transportation study and
mitigation plan to:
1. Single-family homes;and
re 2. Multi-family projects(exclusive of m.'ed-use projects)with less than five
A units or 15,000 gross silt are feet.
ARTICLE IX: (Regulation Section Sts are Reserved) V Possibly add regulations here regarding conversion of non-
N NONCONFORMANCES conforming use to a conforming use and whether that would
U
Sec.118-399.-118-500.- trigger requirements of paying the Mobility Fee or give a
credit/waive the fee.
Article X:HISTORIC Ibl V V Reference to traffic impact study/mitigation and TCMAs shall
PRESERVATION (9) Provided certain minimum criteria as to gross square footage or floor area are be removed.
DIVISION 3.-ISSUANCE triggered as delineated under subsection a.,below.
OF CERTIFICATE OF A traffic circulation analysis and plan,prepared by a professional traffic engineer,
APPROPRIATENESSICER licensed and registered in the State of Florida,which details the impact of projected traffic
TIFICATE TO on the immediate neighborhood and how this impact is to be mitigated,shall be required
DIG/CERTIFICATE OF in the following instances:
APPROPRIATENESS FOR
DEMOLITION a.Within the City's Transportation Concurrency Management Areas(TCMA's),as
amended from time to time,all new development projects exceeding 5,000 gross square
Sec.118-562.- feet.
Application.
b.For development projects that propose new floor area or an increase in floor area,
and are located within a half mile of any roadway segment with a level of service E or F,
as defined by the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual,as
amended from time to time.
c.The following shall be excluded from performing a transportation study and
mitigation plan to:
1. Single-family homes;and
2. Multi-family projects(exclusive of mixed-use projects)with less than five
units or 15,000 gross square feet.
cii.122—Concurrency •
Management
Sec.122-2.-Definitions- Public facilities means the facilities for which the city has adopted levels of service, V V With removal of TCMA's and concurrency replaced by Mobility
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 3
ler
A:per. <. .anw...�+,.�V iw.•Vi+�IIR.�rw.s �
including roads,transit,potable water,sanitary sewer,solid waste,flood protection, Fee,these definitions may be revised(Public facilities,TAZ)or
stormwater management and parks and recreational facilities. removed(TCMA).
TAZ means one or more geographic areas or zones within a TCMA defined by land
use and other geographic variables for the purpose of analyzing the impact of a proposed
development on the city s transportation system.
TCMA means a specific geographic area designated in the city's comprehensive plan
in accordance with Florida law as a transportation concurrency management area where
an area wide level of service(L05)standard is applied.
Sec.122-6.•Level of (a) A determination of concurrency shall be based on the levels of service established V V Remove most of this due to references to concurrency and
Service standards. in the capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan of the city,at the time TCMAs.
the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services.A
(5)Revise considering City budget may be a smaller source of
-o determination of concurrency shall be conducted in accordance with the methodology
funds for mobility projects,and mobility fee fund will finance
described in the city's concurrency management system manual and shall be based on
the capacity of available public facilities less applicable capacity credits within the the projects.
w
applicable TCMA and TAZ.
cn
N
cn
(d) For the purposes of a determination of concurrency,roads and transit facilities
shall be deemed available if they are:
• (1)In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency;
(2)Funded,programmed and scheduled to be available through the applicable city,
state or other governmental agency at the time the proposed development is projected
to generate a demand for services;or
(3)The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the
city or other applicable governmental agency,approved in accordance with
subsection I '.(d),which will ensure that the facilities will be provided at the time the
proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services;
(4)Programmed or otherwise committed to be provided as soon as reasonably
possible such that a substandard level of service c les not exist for a period of more than
three years after the pro nosed development is projected to generate a demand for
services;and
(5)Programmed in the capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan for
construction in or before year three of the city's adopted budget,Miami-Dade County's
Transportation Improvement Program,the Florida Department of Transportation's Five
Year Work Program,or the First Year Priority of the Miami-Dade County long Range
Plan.
Sec.122-8.- (d) In the event the determination is made that the required public facilities will not be V In general,this whole Chapter seems antiquated. Is there a
• Determination of available where needed to serve the proposed development within the applicable TAZ or "concurrency management division"at the City?Could not be
concurrency. the TCMA,an applicant for a preliminary concurrency determination may propose a
mitigation program in order to avoid a negative determination of concurrency.The located on the website. While other public facilities are still
proposed mitigation program shall be based on the same methodology for determining subject to concurrency,the road and transit references need
concurrency,and the city municipal mobility plan,and shall include a specific delineation to be removed. Text in this table is only that which specifically
of responsibilities for providing the required public facilities improvements,adequate calls out TAZ and TCMA. But the whole section is worth
methods for securing performance of the mitigation program,payment of mitigation reviewing with City staff for revision to reflect only the
monies and a proposed recapture program for the provision of excess capacity,if concurrency of public facilities other than transportation.
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 4
Yea'! ,.;i+��4 .� .- •,y -lliti
e#SOZ �(, .-4
., -._r.� ! l.-. ..i..r.� " i- * _°. t.0°va �f .�� -.+. .I-..w. Hr.�r..tRiF....aw►-.,.-.i:- . ^ , !l Y /�. Mir.
applicable.Such mitigation program shall be reviewed and approved by the concurrency
management division,other appropriate departments of the city and other agencies
having jurisdiction.The applicant shall enter into a mitigation agreement,committing to
the mitigation program,with the concurrency management division,which is hereby
authorized to enter into such an agreement on behalf of the city,subject to the approval
of the city attorney's office.The concurrency management division may grant up to 30
percent mitigation credit to individual projects with approved historic designation
undergoing major rehabilitation.No credit will be granted to projects that have already
been rehabilitated and are intensifying their existing land usage.The city commission
may adopt by resolution programs and policies allowing for transportation concurrency
exemptions,a sliding scale,and/or credits for small businesses operating within existing
structures,which have been determined to have a minor impact to the existing roadway
LOS.
(f) In the event a preliminary concurrency determination impact certificate is issued,
m upon issuance of the final development order for which the preliminary concurrency
determination is based,and upon payment of applicable mitigation fees as provided for
p in this Code,a final reservation certificate shall be issued and the available capacity for
eco the respective TCMA and TAZ for the applicable public facilities will be reduced by the
projected demand for the project until the reservation of the capacity expires or
i.e becomes permanent.Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project,the
cn
-a reservation of the capacity of the applicable public facilities becomes permanent.
.........._.
Sec.122.9-_ (6) There shall be five in embers of the concurron:y appeal committee:the director of V Typo(spelling)and possibly no need for a staff member from
Concurrency appeal planning,the director of public works,the director of parks and recreation,an assistant Transportation & Parking to be on the Committee
city manager designated by the city manager,and a member appointed from the city's
committee. (concurrency will no longer be required for transportation).
transportation and parking committee. Would this committee be useful with Mobility Fees?
Ch.126—Landscape [no landscape sections impacted]
Requirements
Ch.130—Off Street V Entire Off Street Parking Chapter should be considered re:
Parking
[Entire Off Street Parking Chapter] Parking Reduction Strategies
Sec.130-31.-Parking Need to make sure this is still valid and doesn't conflict with
districts established. (b)There shall be no off-street parking requirement for main or accessory uses any new policies since new policies usually supersede old
associated with buildings that existed prior to October 1,1993,which are: policies where there is a conflict.
(1)Located within the architectural district,
(2)A contributing building within a local historic district,or
(3)Individually designated historic building.
This provision shall not apply to renovations and new additions to existing buildings which
create or add floor area,or to new construction which has a parking requirement.
ARTICLE V.-FEE IN LIEU V Should be considered re:Parking Reduction Strategies
OF PARKING PROGRAM The fee schedule for this is noted at the end of the table
(from Appendix A, Fee Schedule). Fees should also be re-
visited.
ARTICLE VI—PARKING V Should be considered re:Parking Reduction Strategies
CREDIT SYSTEM
Ch.133—Sustainability [no sustalnability sect ins Impacted]
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 5
•
and Resiliency
Ch.138-Signs Ino sign sections impacted]
Ch.142—Zoning
Districts and Regulations
DIVISION 18.-PS Alternative parking requirements for multifamily residential development in R-PS Makes reference to Ch 130, off street parking, which may
PERFORMANCE districts shall be as required in the parking impact fee program as set forth in l• pt.-. change based on parking reduction strategies.
STANDARD DISTRICT I.0,article v.
Sec.142-705.- [Chapter 130 is"Off Street Parking"I
Alternative parking
requirement for
multifamily residential
development in R-PS
coo districts pursuant to the
parking Impact fee.
Sec.142-706.- (a) All districts.All non-oceanfront and non-bayfront residential development shall V Consider revising parking regulations in relation to new
CPI be encouraged to have parking with access to and from the alley only and such parking Arkin reduction strategies.
les.
Supplemental parking parking g
regulations. shall be rendered not visible from the street by the building's front facade.However,on
corner buildings,the side view may be obscured by a wall.
(b) C-PS3 and C-PS4 districts.In C-PS3 and C-PS4 districts:
(1)One and one-quarter parking spaces per apartment unit,one parking space
per hotel unit,and 29 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial
space except as otherwise specifically provided in subsection I. . ,(b)(2).
Required parking for hotel,hotel accessory uses and club uses may be satisfied
through the provision of valet parking spaces.Twenty percent of required
apartment unit parking spaces may be satisfied through the provision of valet
parking spaces.
(2)Four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial space for all of
the C-P53 or C-PS4 properties of which any portion is located south of Second
Street and west of Washington Avenue or west of the southern theoretical
extension of Washington Avenue.
(c)RM-PSI district.In the RM-PSI district 1.65 pa,king spaces per apartment unit,and
one parking space per 1,000 square feet of any nonresidential use.Up to 12 percent of
the total parking spaces created on the premises may be for valet parking spaces.
DIVISION 20.-TC NORTH (a) Off-street parking for motorized vehicles. Y Consider revising parking regulations in relation to new
BEACH TOWN CENTER (1) Purpose.Parking regulations in the North Beach Town Center are intended to: parking reduction strategies.
DISTRICTS provide centralized public parking garages to serve the town center and minimize the Also there is a typo in(2)(a)"froth"should be"forth"
amount of on-site parking required for individual lots,thereby reducing building bulk
and maximizing ground floor space available for retail and restaurant uses;enable Possibly require more bicycle parking and rideshare pick
Sec.142-739.-Parking. people to park once at a convenient location and to access a variety of commercial up/drop off spot near restaurants/bars/clubs.
enterprises in pedestrian friendly environments by encouraging shared parking;reduce
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 6
lr yr � .�M.Vr4b +mwv✓ Z•.F�.M�+.�'�tL1111r.a+wT.+i..�.1r ~T
diffused,inefficient,single-purpose reserved park•ng;encourage ground floor retail uses
and public facilities;promote walking,bicycling and transit ridership to help reduce the
demand for parking within the district;avoid public facilities;promote walking,bicycling
and transit ridership to help reduce the demand for parking within the district;avoid
adverse parking impacts on neighborhoods adjacent to the town center;maximize on-
street parking where possible;increase visibility and accessibility of parking;provide
flexibility for redevelopment of small sites;and for the preservation of historic buildings;
promote early prototype mixed-use projects using flexible and creative incentives.
(2) [Governing provisions.!Required parking in the North Beach Town Center is
governed by:Ir pi, off-street parking,except as modified herein:
a.Minimum parking requirements for the TC-1 town center core district are set froth
in parking district no.4 in n.• I i. j i,except that apartment buildings shall provide:
1.0 space per unit for units between 550 and 799 square feet;1.25 spaces per unit for
units between 800 and 999 square feet;1.5 spaces per unit for units between 1,000 and
1,200 square feet;2.0 spaces per unit for units above 1,200 square feet.
ce
`$ b.Minimum parking requirements for the TC-2 town center mixed-use district are
Q set forth in parking district no.1 in .:i'r 1.•;'-.i:,except that apartment buildings shall
ro provide:1.0 space per unit for units between 550 and 799 square feet;1.25 spaces per
u,
unit for units between 800 and 999 square feet;1.5 spaces per unit for units between
1,000 and 1,200 square feet;2.0 spaces per unit for units above 1,200 square feet.
c. Minimum parking requirements for the TC-3 town center residential office
district are set forth in parking district no.1 in_.rt Ii.'r' I f0 r:,except that apartment
buildings shall provide:1.0 space per unit for units between 550 and 799 square feet;
1.25 spaces per unit for units between 800 and 999 square feet;1.5 spaces per unit for
units between 1,000 and 1,200 square feet;2.0 spaces per unit for units above 1,200
square feet.
d. Parking requiremznts may be met either on-site or off-site within a distance of
800 feet from the subject lot,subject to subsection :'r. ii•(b).
e. Mixed-use development is encouraged to utilize the shared parking calculations
in .• '.'I.Parking for residential uses may be included in the shared parking
cakulation at a rate of 50 percent for daytime weekdays,70 percent for daytime
weekends,and 100 percent for all other times.Shared parking shall be designated by
appropriate signage and markings.The shared parking facility may be located off-site
within 800 feet of the uses served,subject to subsection '•(b).
f. Developments that provide a significant public amenity such as an urban plaza
(minimum 3,000 square feet)in accord with the NBTC design standards referenced in
I'.' or floor area for a public library(minimum 6,000 square feet and
maximum 15.000 square feet)may be exempted from parking requirements for all uses
on the site at a rate of one parking space for every 500 square feet of urban plaza space
or one parking space for every 250 square feet of library space.
g.New construction of'live-work"projects shall meet the parking requirements for
either residential or commercial uses,whichever is greater,but shall not be required to
meet the parking requirement for both uses.For purposes of this section,a"live-work"
unit is defined as a unit containing both a residential and commercial component within
the same unit.
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 7
ry•� �,.. A, if a�w
...s.•' «.w.a,%:7 ',�,',,.�''». . .. 1f .: dq
53.R- . wrr�r � Y
(b)Bicycle parking_Short-term and long-term bicycle parking shall be provided for new
construction or substantial rehabilitation over 1,000 square feet according to the
minimum standards in the table below.
(1)Short-term bicycle parking(bicycle racks)serves people who leave their bicycles for
relatively short periods of time,typically for shopping,recreation,eating or errands.
Bicycle racks should be located in a highly visible location near the main entrance to the
use.
(2)Long-term bicycle parking includes facilities that provide a high level of security
such as bicycle lockers,bicycle cages and bicycle stations.These facilities serve people
who frequently leave their bicycles at the same location for the day or overnight.
Land Use Minimum Short-term Minimum Long-term Bicycle
Bicycle Parking Spaces Parking Spaces(whichever is
(whichever is greater) greater)
o_
IS)
Vt
Commercial 4 per project or 1 per 10,000 1 per 10%of employees;
nonretail square feet 2 for 5,000 square feet and
under;
3 for 5,001-20,000 square
feet;
6 for 20,001-50,000 square
feet;
10 for 50,000 square feet
• and over
Retail 1 per business,4 per project 1 per 10%of employees;
or 1 per 5,000 square feet 2 for 5,000 square feet and For Retail,suggest increasing the minimum to 2 bicycle spaces
under; per business.
3 for 5,001-20,000 square
feet;
6 for 20,001-50,000 square
feet;
10 for 50,000 square feet
and over
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobikty Fee a
Restaurants, 1 per 10 seats or occupants 1 per 10%of employees For Restaurants, bars, nightclubs, suggest increasing the
bars, minimum to 2 bicycle spaces per 10 seats.
nightclubs
Hotel 2 per hotel or 1 per 10 1 per 10%of employees Hotel service staff are more likely to utilize bicycle parking—
rooms suggest taking inventory/evaluating current use and need for
bicycle parking at hotels. Depending on results,may consider
increasing the minimum.
Multifamily 4 per project or 1 per 10 1 per unit May need to add a category to distinguish hotels which also
residentiai units
have a restaurant, bar, or conference facilities(more service
v staff).
w
10
o-
(c)[More than minimum requirement encouraged.]Developers are encouraged to
^t provide more than the minimum requirement as appropriate for the particular uses in a
ro building.The minimum required vehicular parking may be reduced by:One space for
rJ1 every five long-term bicycle parking spaces,and/or one space for every ten short-term
U
bicycle parking spaces,not to exceed a total of 15 percent of the required vehicle parking
spaces.
(d)[Exemption from vehicle parking requirements.]Nonresidential uses that provide
showers and changing facilities for bicyclists shall be exempted from vehicle parking
requirements at a rate of two vehicle parking spaces for each separate shower up to a
maximum of eight parking spaces.
(e) ITC-1 and TC-2 districts.]in the TC-1 and TC-2 districts,short-term bicycle parking
spaces may be provided in the public right-of-way,subject to design review,in situations
where suitable space near the entrance to the building or storefront is not available on
private property.Bicycle parking in the public right-of-way shall be approved by the
public works department and shall not encroach on the pedestrian throughway zone.
ARTICLE III—OVERLAY For religious institutions in the 40th Street Overla;•District,the following off-street Makes reference to Ch 130, off street parking, which may
DISTRICTS parking regulations shall apply: change based on parking reduction strategies.
•
j DIVISION 8.-40TH IL)For adaptive reuse of existing buildings,including expansions or additions thereto less
STREET OVERLAY than 50 percent of the size of the existing structure,there shall be no parking requirement
provided that there is one or more public parking lot(s)and/or garage(s)within 500 feet
of the subject property.Existing required parking spaces on site shall remain or be
Sec.142-860.-Off-street replaced on-site.
parking regulations. -
(2)For new construction,and expansions or additions of more than 50 percent of the
size of an existing structure,the parking requirement shall be the same as for a single-
family detached dwelling pursuant to_.-11 yo_ :i of the City Code,entitled off-street
parking,article ii,districts;requirements,provided that there is one or more public
parking lot(s)and/or garage(s)within 500 feet of the subject property.
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 9
..,.�.+..�.nL��a �r..-�7+i'� t.�',i...rd,.l.:-�.-��daw�s..���� �:{,f':f..+��r ..t.ri..Kk�.1w,...k�.?�i.4.�._.�W- � - � .+'.�.�5•
Appendix A—Fee
Schedule
— - V Revise fees in light of mobilityfee and
senor I Description Amount g parking reduction
strategies.
rims ode
,off-Stree:Parking Not sure why $35,000 is quoted in 130-132(a) and it shows
$40,000 in the table. Reference to 118-7 only states it is a
one-time or yearly fee in lieu of parking, no "amount" is
t:c,rc.pe:i,:y;::;u;;reea,.rer m provided in 118-7.
•See below for full 130- • i 31 Pee HI Lieu et Pa.keg
132(a),(b)(2)references Consider a higher annual fee, or fee reduction if/when
•
• nx2' strategies are implemented to reduce parking needs(business
� pre r m@ ri•? .J]N:.6
pays full price until they reduce their parking demand, then
they can qualify for a lower fee).
cx Yearly lee acts:
tJ
O
Aide Vit.Serpus arc,L4¢Jpr(+pA:h1➢.a,hong SpJtr
I iii:r;;tihlea p.;rt:ng;4rtes.aapl¢aton fee 2,5.00 •
Add 0011.) apo:c)::u•fes•rl:-P 6C
:3e',-e
•Sec.130-132.-Fee (a)New construction.Th?fee in lieu of providing parking for new construction shall be Reference to 118-7 only states it is a one-time or yearly fee in
calculation. satisfied by a one-time payment at the time of issuance of a building permit of$35,000.00 lieu of parking,no dollar amount is provided in 118-7.
per parking space.The amount of such one-time fee is set forth in :Iit '.
(b)Existing structures and outdoor cafes.When alteration or rehabilitation of a structure
results in an increased parking requirement,or an outdoor cafe is created or expanded,
the fee in lieu of providing parking shall be satisfied by one of the following:
(1)A one-time payment as set forth in subsection(a)of this section.
(2)A yearly payment in the amount set forth in „ I I which shall continue as
long as the use exists.(The amount of such payment may vary from year to year in
accordance with the determination set forth in subsection(d)of this section.)However,
in lieu of continued yearly payments,a one-time redemption payment may be made at
any time of the full amount due pursuant to subsection(a)of this section minus the
amount of money already paid through yearly payments;such amount shall be based
upon the latest determination made pursuant to subsection Id)of this section as of the
time of the redemption payment rather than upon the amount which would have been
due if the fee had been paid at the time of issuance of the building permit.However,
when new floor area is added to the existing building,the fee in lieu shall be as set forth
in subsection(a)of this section.
Review of Land Development Regulations for Mobility Fee 10
Attachment P
Best Practices For Reduced Parking Requirements
Page 1504 of 2557
4:11:: KEITH
SCHNARS
ENGINEERS PLANNERS - -
Best Practices for Reduced Parking Requirements
City of Miami Beach
Task 8:Land Development Code Review
1. Increase availability from existing supply by making daytime business parking lots available to
public at night or residential lots available to public during the day.
2. Reduced requirements for certain types of uses that are within a walking distance (no more than
1,500 feet)of rail or bus stops.
3. Reduced requirements for affordable housing and senior housing due to lower vehicle
ownership (1/2 space reduction per unit and may include individual deed-restricted affordable
units aside from entire buildings/communities).
4. Consider reducing the requirements for uses with higher likeliness of carpooling (co-workers to
offices) and Uber/Lyft/Taxi (bars, nightclubs, restaurant/bars). Preferred parking (reserved
spaces) for car pool users and ride matching services (for car pools) can reduce parking space
demand to justify lower parking requirements.
5. Reduction of on-site parking if a major employer provides a shuttle to/from an off-site parking
location. This is best for hospitals or extended hour businesses such as 24-hour call centers,
where specific shift start/end times are common.
6. Land banking and landscape reserves — during design/development stages, set aside area that
can serve as extra landscaping or greenspace but could be converted to more parking if the
future if demand changes or the use within the building changes.
7. Revise code to show some uses with MAXIMUM parking requirements instead of minimum.
This is not for all uses.
8. Allow for transferable parking rights between property owners(should be filed with the City for
inventory purposes within the district).
9. If parking spaces are reduced for a business/commercial use,there could be spillover parking in
nearby residential areas. To mitigate this, develop a parking permit system for residents who
utilize street parking spaces to be enforced during certain times (mostly when residents are
expected to be home; evenings and weekends).
6500 North Andrews Avenue l Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132
(954) 776-1616 1 (800)488-12551 Fax: (954) 771-7690
www.ksfla.com
Page 1505 of 2557
Best Practices for Reduced Parking Requirements
Page 2 of 3
10. Where there is shared parking for a balanced mix of uses and peak time demands for those uses,
provide a reduction in requirement. Miami Beach already utilizes a formula for mixed
use/shared parking.
11, Fees in-lieu of Parking—Miami Beach already has this in place, but should consider adjusting the
fees, expanding the program or expanding the applicable area.
12. Improvements to Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle LOS may reduce parking demand to justify
lower parking requirements.
13. Reductions for businesses which offer company vehicles for employees to use during the work
day, even if it is not for business purposes(such as a doctor appointment or personal errand) so
they will leave their personal cars at home and utilize other methods of travel to work.
14. Charging for parking, even at private businesses (employees pay or have it deducted from pay
check) will encourage drivers to seek other alternatives. When this system is in place, parking
requirements can be reduced. This can be a condition of approval for new development.
15. Cash-out program — give employees the choice of free or subsidized parking with a transit
/vanpool subsidy equal to the value of the parking ($100 of the subsidy is tax-free by law), or a
carpool/walk/bike subsidy equal to the value of the parking(not tax deductible). There are a lot
of ways to administer cash out programs (additional info available).
16. Adjust pricing by the type or length of parking. This is meant to discourage long-term parking
for commuters in areas where short-term shopping/business is encouraged.
17. For multi-family residential, do not include parking in the cost of the rent. Charge separately.
Or, for those who do bundle the monthly rent with parking, offer a rent rebate or discount for
those who use less than their allocated number of spaces.
3
' KEITH H•-' SCHNAPS
Page 1506 of 2557
Attachment C
biome 444/14414441 aeetteraa..y ren 1244.44.1444e Foal Omer`141.1
anentlefee.lbrIMIW
,. M ONAe Caarrty Neral Ides Mimi CarelGoble. 3•11.014ee/rConant aMuf4.se*/Proposed
N Impact Fees
(P064e,Fire,
erten Infill As. Mareine Total nty � Transp„Parks, N Paper Fees[Ponce, Tre.irOlf>Um
Use Unita )URA)Road Nan•UU flee Pao. (with Parks if 55.!!54 Mobility,fee OM(TrNPsp.. Street8,kerns Fire,Parts,Muniepal, Parks Coneurreney iar44 Mobility Fee
(Added to ROWS Appll<aalel Impart Fees Air Quality Sever,Selid Mobiles,Ad mi n) Concurrency (North Beach COMunMcy
Municipal Feasl {Ponce&flee! 081,Adminl Warta Feel
Government)
,-
Sanwa)1-Retail to Restaurant(Obs.oge of Use)
Reim](SF I 1.087 17,944.63 $ 18.47856 T5 18,978.59 $ 3462.03 7
Current Use(Credit! Restaurant(SeNsl 16 30,330.75 $ 32,139.51 S 32,139.52 ,S 7,18692
Proposed Use Restaurant[Seats!, 30 56,982.66 60.261.60 5 60.26160 5 13,475.47
Tarot M S 4647.23-$ 3,143.19 $ 4124.52 N/A ler Retail to Rest. If/Afar 1355613 tO Rest. f 40123 3 1.24143
tad to Carey Meat Pao $ 9.16861 $ 1!-05525 $ esa as 8 8667.2♦_$ 13065s1_$ Sea6.71
54lawia 2-Raskienur.l/rdldarl(Deno 1 Now Consicrodoni
Current Use(Credal Residential(lines! 3 $ 17,65311 5 30.160.58 $ 7,872.89 5 3,463.74 N/A N/A 5 18,144.00
97690984 Use Resdential(Un733 16 5 86,824.00 5 164051.20 1 15,12308 $ 1841997 5 6.15360 5 10,816,00 S 96,768-00 5 5,443.75 5 15,267.26 5 544375 $ 19.695.00
rod sae 5 611,878.39 $ 1Ii,ffi32 $ 17,415.41 0 1430.40 3 746Z800 $ 25,713.01 $ 26,11in
MN ei/C4.a3/
$eepsa/ee S 13BASIS2 $ 94530 .8 44.1411.44 $ 6c,23a $ .8.305.91 S 114,13044
See43alie 3-Cessener el ee I ...1aal/Carwiwd.(Ch.ne o6 Use)
Current Use(Credit)Road(SP l 2.600 47921.84 $ 45,394961 S 45,39436 $ 8.213085 r
Reel 5i3 1,165 19,232.29 5 20,340.43 5 20940.43 5 3.710,46
Proposed Use Restaurant(Seats( 30 56.98266 5 60,261.60 5 60,261.60 5 13,475.47 ,
rope Pm 1$ 33,233.12 $ 35,50707 5 491508 NA fee Rapp to Rest. N/A fee ft..R.Rest 0 5,14024 $ 11,402.13
'Mg dOnset egad Poe $ 1/.5001 $ armour 8 semen I seamen $ imam $ 48.41821
Scenario 4_MppMMfd Wed Use/e/ding(Deese•Ms.Ct3.O5ctlae)
Hetet(98oms) 27 5 210,880 15 5 323.043.35 S 8,38015 S 7.09506 5 238.518.57 5 15.475.32 46,165.08 S 101,706.00 i
Current use lfredrt1 Office(5f1 13.000 5 177,53390 5187,74730 $ 5,764.20 $ 4.9110.20 $ 191.391.70 5 10,64440 24,823.64 S 75,062.00
Retail(573 1000$ 3301640 $ 34,919.20 5 886311 5 75060 5 96,556.80 5 1,637.60 5 6,369.88 S 9,29200
Restaurant!Seats] 215 $ 401375.73 5 431.874,80_S 7,340,49 5 6.214.75 5 445,430.03 S 13.555.23 5 %674.19 5 78,932,00
Residential(Uni50 188 $ 691.413.24 $I,451,343.20 5 180,034.44 5 216,434.67 5 72.304.80 5 127,088.00 5 1,137.024.00
Proposed Use Office(SF 3 24.673 5 336,982-86 $356,373.26 510,961.34 $ 9,26337 5 376.577.97 5 10,204 71 47,119,16 517,450.87 $ 34,497.05 $ 144950.00
Retail(571 26.690 $ 440,609.20 $465,996.71 511.834.35 510.01943 5 487,850.53 S 11.853.77 $ 85,006.09 5 42.965.56 5 37,31262 5 125,442.00 5 76.463.75 5 141,1112 87 $76,463.75 5 338,294.98
rami Fee S 434,200.71 $ 1,334,17236 $ 361407.42 $ 33161490 $ 1.133.77400 $ 224,566.02 $ 414,75173
Maim/C.mir Ytp.l4etp $ 43/4,-025518 MALLS S 33055885.8 8.272x43471 8 881473034 $ 4411,930411
0,40.0,.n.,.......n,..elasier d',ma in 601....d M iota ewe..awu 4N.7ew.er4 mania r ea.....cense.,...ieWe rrgena 3071 6.0 e,..t.,I>4.`e••e reoMev.,r e6m4.,'air*re nee one,.0.140.res.mar mer eere.meet N..172 mar'u a Por be^ionserrm
Pape 1507 of 2557
Attachment D
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23874
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONCURRENCY
STATEMENTS FOR INTERESTED PARTIES,PURSUANT TO THE MIAMI
BEACH AUTOMATED CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; THE
METHODOLOGY USED TO ARRIVE AT THE COST PER TRIP FOR
MITIGATION OF IMPACTS FROM PROJECTS THAT EXCEED TRAFFIC
CONCURRENCY, PLUS A SCHEDULE OF TRANSPORTATION
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION FEES TO BE CHARGED FROM SUCH
PROJECTS; THESE STATEMENTS TO BE ISSUED AND FEES TO BE
COLLECTED BY THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION/CONCURRENCY
DIVISION.
WHEREAS, the Miami Beach Automated Concurrency Management System (CMS) is a
computer program that measures the impact of proposed development, redevelopment, or use
intensification projects on public services, including traffic; and
WHEREAS, certain development, redevelopment, or use intensification projects may not
satisfy traffic concurrency requirements due to the fact that the traffic they generate exceed the
available capacity of the City's roadway system; and
WHEREAS, the potential impacts of these projects can be evaluated and possibly mitigated
by utilizing mechanisms established by the City's Municipal Mobility Plan(MMP)and Concurrency
Management System(CMS),which require the payment of fees by the project applicants; and
WHEREAS, the administrative fees to be charged for the issuance of individual
Concurrency Statements range from $125 to $335 in cost, as shown in Exhibit A, which is herein
attached and made part of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the revenue produced by the administrative fees will fund the operation,
maintenance, and bi-annual update of the CMS and MMP, along with the salaries of added staff for
the Transportation/Concurrency Division; and
WHEREAS,the schedule of fees to be charged for Transportation Concurrency Mitigation
is based on the cost per trip for each area of the City,which cost is determined by dividing the costs
of the MMP-proposed transportation improvement projects,by the additional capacity to be realized
through the implementation of such projects,as shown in Exhibits A-1,A-2,and A-3 herein attached
and made part of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS,the revenues produced by the Concurrency Mitigation fees will be deposited
in specific accounts for either the North, Middle,or South Beach TCMA areas where collected, and
subsequently appropriated for specific MMP projects by Resolution of the City Commission; and
Page 1508 of 2557
WHEREAS, an annual Concurrency Report, including the total amount of fees collected in
the report year, will be made at a regular City Commission Meeting by the Transportation/
Concurrency Manager.
WHEREAS,these fees and the methodology used to arrive at these fees need to be approved
and adopted by the City Commission in order to be implemented by the City's Transportation/
Concurrency Management Division.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission hereby approve and adopt administrative fees for the various Concurrency Statements
to be issued for interested parties, pursuant to the Miami Beach Automated Concurrency
Management System;the methodology used to arrive at the cost per trip for the mitigation of impacts
from projects that exceed traffic concurrency, plus a schedule of Transportation Concurrency
Mitigation fees to be charged from such projects; these statements to be issued and fees to be
collected by the Transportation/Concurrency Division.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 12th day of April ,2000.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
190A,(LA
CI Y CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
&FOR EXECUTION
,I y-3-02)
F,PLAMSALLUMELIAtLOPES CIASFEIES WPD dy't Dote
Page 1509 of 2557
EXHIBIT A
CONCURRENCY STATEMENT FEES
1. Concurrency Inquiry Statement $125.00
2. Preliminary Concurrency Determination Statement(based on intensity level):
Low (1 to 100 trips) $125.00
Medium (101 to 400 trips) $235.00
High (401-plus trips) $335.00
3. Final Concurrency Reservation Statement $150.00
DEFINITIONS:
1. Concurrency Inquiry Statement (CIS, available capacity inquiry) -To be performed and
issued when there is a request or inquiry as to amount of available infrastructure capacity in
a specific area and no development project is involved. All available capacity information
contained in the inquiry statement is considered to be accurate for only the date that it is
issued.
2. Preliminary Concurrency Determination Statement(PCDS)-To be performed and issued
when there is a request for a concurrency review involving an individual development
project. The issuance of a valid concurrency information statement is required for all Design
Review Board(DRB)and Planning Board(PC)application(project)packages. The issuance
of a PCDS will secure the project's "place in line"during the review/approval process and
temporary reservation of capacity, if available.
3. Final Concurrency Reservation Statement (FCRS) - to be issued only when a
development project has received all of its required development approvals or sign-offs and
has satisfied its concurrency requirements. Such requirements may include but are not
limited to, the payment of mitigation fees or execution of an enforceable development
agreement for the funding and implementing of needed infrastructure improvements or
capital improvement projects within a designated time period. Pursuant to the issuance of
a FCRS, capacity will be reserved for the specific project for a period not to exceed one (1)
year.
F IPLAMSALL AMELJAHAPESICMSFEES.WPD
Page 1510 of 2557
EX4-1I8IT A-1.
Miami Beach Concurrency Management System
Capacity per TAZ
TAZ CfAZ Cunene Copocitp Availabk TCMA Section
North Beech
29 44 4,369 9,228 4,859
31 48 38,685 44,457 5,772 1 1
32 50 24,791 84,923 60,132 0 1
34 52 31,184 95,700 64,516 0 1
35 55 50,932 64,488 13,556 1 1
36 57 26,219 39,275 13,056 1 1
37 59 16,880 23,382 6,502 0 1
Sub Total 193,060 361,453 168,393
Middle Beach
22 30 11,307 11,307 - 2 2
23 33 21,430 32,433f11,003 0 2
24 35 22,098 23,057 f 959 0 2
25 36 18,533 30,967 12,434 0. 2
26 37 11,771 17,124 5,353 2 2
27 38 31,157 61,434 30,277 2 2
28 42 33,421 46,145 12,724 2 2
29 45 23,825 56,542 32,717 2 2
30 46 44,693 • 54,197 9,504 2. 2
Sub Total 218,235 333,206 114,971
Saudi Beath
3 2 8,965 14,690 5,725 3 3
4� 3 5,820 30,300 24,480 3 3
5 4 4,799 14,139 9,340 3 3
6 5 8,672 17,572 8,900 3 3
7 6 5,978 10,381 _ 4,403 3 3
_ 8 7 10,352 22,182 11,830 3 3
9 8 2,427 , 2,428 , 1 0 3
10 9 17,660 26,222 8,562+ 3 3
11 11 21,875 30,746 8,871 3 3
12 13 37,651 38,812 1,161 3 3
13 14 28,462 33,021 4,559 3 3
14 16 25,584 26,547 963 3 3
15 17 23,034 ' 23,034 3 3
16 20 11,895 15,828 3,933 0 3
17 21 22,196 28,883 6,687 3 3
15 24 45,948 58,045 12,097 3 3
19 25 65,836 66,659 823 3 3
20 27 32,302 36,003 3,701 3 3
21 28 12,251 19,073 6,822 3 3
Sub Total 391,707 514,565 122,858
Tocol 803,002 1,209,224 406,222
H:\21 10\excel\CostPerTrip,CurCop•FutCap.xls\taz
03/29/2000 Page 1511 of 2557
EXHIBIT A -2
QA^ ` ;pp a m0�(OO�CM1. rinx 'r,a�0 _ -O <r mn
1'1 Y1 H r1�'i lei f'/e�Y l'i �h�1�!Y M1 F N�M1 h�'1 K fV(V N —h ry».\ R n ^
v av N ''.' N
n _m_ n•.
2 N',,,‘ M R - -
n g o
M
.1 M H - ^
n d N'
h o -
M10 r
O
d
of
eggegfixg gggggegggg1ge ggg ggggg'_gggggf
i
1§f§§§11141§:§1§.§.M r ,E;.4.14pp '^ ETFFO- N n :WJ^d g,.. ,th-? M� ^ ' " . elhal
Lte
N MMM �
Iii
ME
! Iii 1
" 1IIllhIllJIlJllI 111-
1 -.1/1 uol
LIJIIliJII!JIII1
H
ft
U
d
d
i li
li illii 2 Illi II ,..- . 4
ililu1 441,y L _lJ�WSr 000= ll]I lifjp pile oti,; i1 ; i
iji ; or ;lit t �I1Itu 'd
,r,va..mo � rnn
^ec � " omn nnac�Veri nnnino�orrr �I , � i
i
` Fi
i
7z
L
Page 1512 of 2557
E. 'K IT A- 3
Table 3
Miami Beach Concurrency Management System
Transportation Cosi per Trip of Additional Capality
Fume Capacity(based on
TAZ &me busk Friss WO aay' project bank) Additional Capacity Cost per Trip
Nast Btath
29 9,228 9,228 -
31 44,457 47,569 _ 3,112
32 84,923 85,772 849
34 95,700 96,657 957
35 64,488 65,778 1,290 _ _
36 39,275 40,453 1,178
37 23,382 23,616 234
Sub Total 361,453 369,073 7,620 S 1,841
Middle Bttgdt
22 11,307 11,985 678
23 32,433 34,703 2,270
24 23,057 23,518 461
25 30,967 _ 31,896 929_
26 17,124 17,295 171 _ _
27 61,434 62,048 614
28 46,145 47,529 1,384
29 56,542 57,107 565
30 54,197 54,739 542 _
Sub Total 333,206 340,822 7,616 S 2,783
Semis Beads
3 14,690 14,690 -
4 30,300 32,421 2,121
5 14,139 14,280 141
6 17,572 17,748 176
7 10,381 10,589 208
8 22,182 23,957 1,775
9 2,428 2,428 -
10 26,222 28,058 1,836
11 30,746 32,591 1,845
12 38,812 39,588 776
13 33,021 33,681 660
14 26,547 28,140 1,593
15 23,034 24,186 1,152
16 15,828 15,828 -
17 28,883 31,771 2,888
18 58,045 62,689 4,644
19 66,659 68,659 2,000
20 36,003 37,803 1,800
21 19,073 20,790 1,717
Sub Total 514,565 539,895 25,330 S 2,016
'Additional counts will be undertaken to determine the affects adiacent municipalities and to consistently updated the base fine.
1-t\21 I0\ex, \CoskPerlrip.CurCop-Fop xis\"able 3
03!29/2000 Page 1513 of 2557
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
http:Nci.miami-beach.tl.u.
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 3cb-co
TO: Mayor Nelsen O.Kasdin and DATE: April 12,2000
Members of the City Commission
FROM: Lawrence A.Levy ..;#
City Manager I
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONCURRENCY
STATEMENTS FOR INTERESTED PARTIES,PURSUANT TO THE MIAMI
BEACH AUTOMATED CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; THE
METHODOLOGY USED TO ARRIVE AT THE COST PER TRIP FOR
MITIGATION OF IMPACTS FROM PROJECTS THAT EXCEED TRAFFIC
CONCURRENCY, PLUS A SCHEDULE OF TRANSPORTATION
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION FEES TO BE CHARGED FROM SUCH
PROJECTS; THESE STATEMENTS TO BE ISSUED AND FEES TO BE
COLLECTED BY THE CITY'S TRANSPORTATION/CONCURRENCY
DIVISION.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
ANALYSIS
The Miami Beach Automated Concurrency Management System(CMS)is a mechanism to measure
the impact of proposed development, redevelopment, or use intensification projects on public
services, including traffic. A project is considered to satisfy traffic concurrency requirements when
the traffic generated by such project does not exceed the available capacity of the City's roadway
system.
The potential impact of projects that exceed the available capacity can be evaluated and possibly
mitigated by utilizing mechanisms made available by the City's Municipal Mobility Plan (MMP)
and Concurrency Management System (CMS). This process requires the payment of fccs by the
affected parties.
Pursuant to the CMS, a schedule of fees and the methodology used to arrive at these fees need to be
approved and adopted by the City Commission in order to become effective and implemented by the
City's Concurrency Division. Two different fee schedules are being proposed by this Resolution,
as follows:
P.'FLA1 ALL'AMWL(ALLOPES\CMSPEES.WPD (_�
AGENDA ITEM ``
DATE 44—I 2:600
Page 1514 of 2557
April 12, 2000
Commission Memorandum
Schedule of Concurrency Fees
Page 2
Concurrency Statement Fees (or administrative fees) to be charged for issuance of the
various concurrency statements that will be required from prospective applicants, as follows:
Concurrency Inquiry Statement $125.00
Preliminary Concurrency Determination Statement(based on intensity level):
Low(1 to 100 trips) $125.00
Medium(101 to 400 trips) $235.00
High (401-plus trips) $335.00
Final Concurrency Reservation Statement $150.00
The revenue produced by these administrative fees will fund the operation,maintenance,and
bi-annual update of the Automated Concurrency Management System and Municipal
Mobility Plan, along with the salaries of added staff for the Transportation/Concurrency
Division. We estimate that approximately one thousand(1000)Concurrency Statements may
be issued a year.
2. Transportation Concurrency Mitigation Fees. A specific methodology was used to arrive
at the cost per trip of additional capacity for mitigation of impacts caused by projects that
exceed concurrency. This methodology is as follows:
0 CURRENT CAPACITY. The CMS provides information on the current available capacity
of the TAZs, as shown in Table 1, herein attached. The additional capacity per TAZ was
determined by applying the additional capacity,as listed in Table 2,to the existing or current
capacity. The future capacity is the sum of the current capacity and the additional capacity.
0 PROJECT BANK. The Municipal Mobility Plan (MMP) created a "Project Bank"
comprised of a number of transportation improvement projects, as shown in Table 2,
Project Bank Cost Estimates, herein attached. Table 2 also identifies the TAZs that will
benefit from these:.asportation improvement projects and the additional capacity in terms
of a percentage increase expected to be realized. Some of these projects have already
identified funding sources or have been programmed for construction, while others remain
unfunded. A portion of the funding for these unfunded projects could be provided from fees
collected for development projects that do not satisfy transportation concurrency
requirements.
The yet unfunded "Project Bank" transportation improvement projects were sorted by the
area of the City they benefit, and rough cost estimates were produced, as shown in Table 1
and as follows:
* Ten(10)projects for North Beach, at approximately $10 million,
* Sixteen(16)projects for Middle Beach, at approximately $31.9 million; and
* Eleven(11)projects in South Beach, at approximately$25.7 million.
Page 1515 of 2557
April 12, 2000
Commission Memorandum
Schedule of Concurrency Fees
Page 3
0 TCMA/TAZ. The City was divided into three(3)Transportation Concurrency Management
Areas (TCMAs) -North, Middle and South Beach TCMAs - which were further separated
into thirty two (32) traffic analysis zones (TAZs) for traffic concurrency management
purposes.
0 The COST PER TRIP for each area of the City, as shown in Table 3, was determined by
dividing the costs of transportation improvement projects by the additional capacity realized
through implementation of the project bank. Transportation Cost Per Trip of Additional
Capacity. The costs per trip once a project fails to satisfy traffic concurrency requirements
based on current capacity are as follows:
* $1,841.54 in North Beach, which has the largest amount of trips available, and
approximately $10 million in programmed but yet unfunded MMP transportation
improvement projects.
* $2,783.30 in Middle Beach, which has the least amount of trips available and
approximately$32 million in programmed/unfunded MMP projects. Middle Beach
contains several roadway links(Alton Road,41st Street, and 63rd Street)which have
severe level-of-service(LOS) problems.
* $2,015.16 in South Beach, where there are some trips available in most TAZs,
excepting the ones in and near the Art Deco Historic District and Redevelopment
Areas, and approximately $25.7 million in programmed/unfunded MMP projects.
However, South Beach is served by an existing and enhanced Electrowave shuttle
route, and is the first area of the City where the TCMA/Urban Transit Village
concept will be tested.
The revenue collected,as above-mentioned,will be deposited in specific accounts for each area,
and su :cquently appropriated by Resolution of the city Commission for the implementation
of specific MMP projects.
An annual Concurrency Report,including the total amount of fees collected in the report year,
will be made at a regular City Commission Meeting by the Transportation/Concurrency
Manager.
Pursuant to the extensive and innovative planning and concurrency efforts undertaken by the
Transportation/Concurrency Division staff and City consultants, the Administration recommends
approval of the fee schedules and of the methodology used to arrive at these fees, as stated.
Attachments: Tables 1, 2, and 3
LL/Mti
S/JJ/ F 1PLAMfALLAMELIAILOPE31L7A5FEES WPO
Page 1516 of 2557
TA BLE I
Miami Beach Concurrency Management System
Capacity per TAI
Tu CTAZ CurmW Capootp boilable TCMA Sedion
Nardi Booth
29 44: 4,369_ 9,228 4,859
31 48 38,685 44,457 5,772 1 1
32 50 24,791 84,923 60,132 0 1
34 52 31,184 95,700 64,516 0 1
35 55 50,932 64,488 13,556 1 1
36 5f 26,2)9_ 39,275 13,056 1 1
37 59 16,880 23,382 6,502 _ 0 1
Sub Toto! 193,068 361,453 168,393
Middle Beads '
22 30 11,307 , 11,307 - 2 2
23 33 21,430 32,433 11,003 0 2'
24 35 22,098 23,057 959 0 2
25 36 18,533 30,967 12,434 0 2
26 37 11,771 17,124 5,353 2 2
27 38 31,157 61,434 30,277 2.- 2
28 42 33,421 46,145 12,724 2 2
29 45 23,825 56,542 32,717 2 2
r 30 46_ 44,693 , 54,197 9,504 _ 2 2
Sub Told 218,235 333,206 114,971
Sarah Beads
3 2 8,965 14,690 5,725 3_ 3
4 3 5,820 30,300 24,480 3 3
5 4 4,799 14,139 _ 9,340 3 3
6 5 8,672 17,572 8,900 3 3
7 6 5,978_, 10,381 4,403 3 3
8 7 10,352 22,182 11,830 3 3
9 8 2,427 _ 2,428 1 0 3
10 9 17,660 26,222 8,562 3 3
11 11 21,875 30,746 8,871 3 3
12_ 13r- 37,651 38,812 1,161 3` 3
13 14 28,462 33,021 4,559 3 3
14 16 25,584 26,547 963 3 3
15 17 23,034 • 23,034 - 3 3
V
16 20 11,895 15,828 3,933 , 0 3
17 21 22,196_ 28,883 6,687 3 3
18 24� 45,948 58,045 12,097 3 3
19 25 65,836 66,659 823 3 3
20 27 32,302 36,003 3,701 3 3
21 28_ 12,251 19,073 6,822 3_ 3
Sub Total 391,707 514,565 122,858
Told 803,002 1,209x24 406,212
H:\21 10\excel\CosiPerTrip,CurCap-FutCap.xls\taz
03/29/2000
Page 1517 of 2557
Table 2
Mimi Bt11ai3 Ceeoerteeq Mwgaeeet Spew
taped d T3aupoelaliue Ielmpeomesees
IOW/dm --- Prov.$easei To.dCa.t Add.tordCapone, kepacsedTAZ
1 Noah 8eochCommunayShunr.Erponsion Mlernoi .Mode 52,859,000' 1% 31,32,34,35,36,37
2 North Beach Neighborhood Cakrs.nu/Sneettcoye Iroprpremetis Contrntondi Smtoirabrtty $255,000 i 0% _ 35.36.
3 Iiordrsa A ..Enhancements Corridor Enhancement $415,000 0% 35,36
4 6.scotne E16m.1ew2 School Cut Joan Imaroverrtenty Co.n.m M,SuaomobiLly $72,500 _ 1% 35 3637
6 Norman*Drive/71st Suer Corndwfnhancements _Corridor Enhoncement $1,465,000 0% 32 34.
7 Indian Creek Drive Copocity Impro.ernems Copocity Imrn
p.o.. am $875,000 5%..— 31
8 North Beach Waiedront Access Improvements Alternative Mod. $170,000 0% 31
9 Control Avenue kn,0.m.nrs/Regyl9tion Program Corridor Enhonc.ment $1,725,000 1% 31,36
10 Noah Beach Walk Alternate*,Mode __ $2,710,000_ 0% 31,36
Sub Total 110,037,500
wee.ewe%
11 A..nw Rooktneren, .Comdor Er honcement M200,000 OM 30
14 Aeon Rood Enhuncem .k
.nts(43rd Sneer to 63rd ..lj Corridor Enhancement r $2, 25,900 0% 28,29
15 Middle B.och Wolk Maroons Mode $3,310,000 0% 24,25,26,30
16 4Tds Street Troll Calming/Solely Improvements Common*Sustornob.iay $75,000 0% 27,28
ID 1 7 Nautrlw/Barshore Ns.hbcxhgod Cotrwg Protect Communay SustoinnMlrry )810,000 0%— 27,27,28
CO - Ahriman..Mod. $4,050,000 1% 22,23,24,25,26,27,26,29,3(
co 18 Meddle Beach Community Shut4.Eepansan s-..
19 43rd Str.et/Abn Rood Irv.nace°.Copoch lit ro..rneret Cocoon*Impo.am.nt 1620,000 2% 28
Gil 20 Middle Beach Ireermodol focdp, AJ.rnatrv.Mode —, 30 0% 28
CO 21 Indron Creek O,..e141 st Sir t L.er..ct.on C9Podry Imororenrne Copoc.y I n on.rn.nr 36,330,000, 2% 25
22 Amon Rood/41st Street Inwn.cnon Co n.orc Corridor Enh9nc.nsent $315,000, 0% 28
24 Alton Road Enhancement'I A.chyan Avenue la Chase Aventyl Condor Enhoncerrs.nl , $1,170,000 0% 22
N) 25 Inchon Creek On..M.Ai-Purpose TtRil Ak.rnor.e M9de $3,3_19% 24,25,26,30,31
C7'I 26 Dad}Boule.ard/23c Street Intoner-nonAkgnment Corridor Enhonc.m _ yy
.nr 391 0 IS20,23,24
ET .
27 Dodo eo.Mnrrrd InM.1.c*on I.. r rimer Corrdor EnMncemeot $2,580900 3% 20,21,23
V
ZB Abri Rd 12Wt L.and Sunset Dr/20dt Sr Irrl.r{M.ors R.c°bw°rro^/t^p`°'ti^rer.+ Condor Enhancement $375,000 2%_ 22,77
44 Calm Avenue Grad Boohooed _CorndorEnhancw+wu 3625.000 0% I9,20,24,75.26,3C,
Sub Taal $32,610,000
Sough reads
30 DorM Boulvard/17th,Str.el/W m Avenue Intersection RIcc rdigurolion&Conn.chon Comdor E nharKer..r4 $3,200,000 3% 17 2i
32 Venslion Causeway Improv.m Intl and Enhancements Corridor Enhoncernent $2,625,000 0% 16
33 164h Stier E nhonc.m.ny/Operohonol Improvements Corridor Enhorrcernem 5325,000 2% 17,18,19
34 Anton Rood Cr c!1 Inr.uyernsnts Capacity h.rpay.rn.m 11,200 000 5%' 4,8,10,1 1,14,15,17,18,21
35 Flonvngo Pork Ne.o!•borhood Colmina_Proi.ct Cansmoross S l rosisrhly 1615,000, 0%.— $,11,1 4,18
37_ Wosh.nglon Avenue Enhancements Candor E nhonc.mem $3300,000 1% 5,6,7,8,11,12,17,14,18,19,20,21
JB 5th Sneer/*Hon Rood Int4rseclion Improvemaas Copoc.ty Improvement 53,600,000 2% 4,6 10
39 Eayt-West Tama Corridor —
Mlernal re Mode 10 0% N/A,
40 South B.och Intemadnl Forilay Alternot...Mod. $8,275,000 0% 4
41 South B.och Wolk Mtemal .Abd. _$2,210,000' 0% 3,6,7,12,13,19,20
42 South Point Sneetscape/Ped.nlnon Access Program Community Sustoinobil,Y 11365,000 0% 3,4 5 678,
43 Ocean Dom Op.atr rid Improvsmetrst $675,000 1% 7,12 13
Sob Taal $26,390,000
/td 569,037,500
00
r
m
n V r 1a,,..c.nC a.th,l.,C..C..$.C,0,h„aS.7 N
w,»noao
rfgt.E 3
Tobk 3
Miami Bead)Conwrtency Management System
Transportation Cost per Trip of Additional Capacity
Fuzee Cagexity aimed on
TAI (igol Geott FwJ seIM rear Pd bard Additional Capacity Cod per Trip
_North Ina
29 9,228 9,228 -
31 44,457 47,569 3,112 _
32 _ 84,923 85,772 849
34 95,700 96,657 957 ,
35 64,488 65,778 1,290
36 39,275 40,453 1,178
37 23,382 23,616 234
Sub Total 361,453 369,073 7,620 S 1,841
Mimeo toads
22 11,307 ' 11,985 6781
23 32,433 34,703 2,270
24 23,057 23,518 461
25 30,967 31,896 929 ,
26 17,124 17,295 171
27 61,434 62,048 614
28 _ 46,145 47,529 1,384
29 56,542 57,107 565
30 54,197 54,739 542
Sub Total 333,206 340,822 7,616 S 2,783
Sera Iwdr
3 14,690 14,690 •
4 30,300 32,421 2,121
5 14,139 14,280 141
6 17,572 17,748 176 •
7 10,381 10,589 208
8 22,182 23,957 1,775
9 •-- 2,428 2,428 -
10 26,222 28,058 1,836
11 30,746 , 32,591 1,845
12 38,812 39,588 776
13 33,021 33,681 660
14 26,547 28,140 , 1,593
15 23,034 24,186 1,152
16 15,828 15,828 -
17 28,883-1 31,771 2,888
18 ' 58,045 62,689 4,644
19 66,659 68,659 2,000
20 36,003 37,803 1,800
21 19,073 20,790 1,717
Sub Total 514,565 539,895 25,330 S 2,016
•Additional counts will be undertaken to determine the affects adjacent municipalities and to consistently updated the base line.
KU!'0\eac�1\CoePwTnp,C.Cop-FoCop df\Table 3
03/29(2000
Page 1519 of 2557
Mobility Fees -Land Development Regulations
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SUBPART B OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING CHAPTER 118, ENTITLED
"ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED
"DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES," AT SECTION 118-263, ENTITLED
"APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW," AND CHAPTER 118, ENTITLED
"ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE X, ENTITLED
"HISTORIC PRESERVATION," DIVISION 3, ENTITLED "ISSUANCE OF
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/CERTIFICATE TO DIG/CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION," AT SECTION 118-662, ENTITLED
"APPLICATION," TO MODIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC STUDIES
CONSISTENT WITH REVISED CONCURRENCY STANDARDS; AMENDING
CHAPTER 122, ENTITLED"CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT," TO BE RENAMED
AS "CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES"; DELETING,
AMENDING,AND RESTATING PROVISIONS IN SECTIONS 122-1 THROUGH 122-
10;CREATING ARTICLE I,ENTITLED"PURPOSE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS,"
SECTION 122-1, ENTITLED "PURPOSE," TO STATE THE PURPOSE FOR
CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-2, ENTITLED
"DEFINITIONS," TO ESTABLISH DEFINITIONS RELATED TO CONCURRENCY
MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-3, ENTITLED
"CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEE REQUIRED," TO
ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCURRENCY REVIEW AND
CALCULATION AND PAYMENT OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-4, ENTITLED
"CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY FEE REVIEW," TO ESTABLISH
DEPARTMENTAL AND AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY FOR REVIEW OF SPECIFIC
CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEE REQUIREMENTS; SECTION 122-5,
ENTITLED "EXEMPTIONS FROM CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND MOBILITY
FEES," TO PROVIDE EXEMPTIONS FROM CONCURRENCY REVIEW AND
MOBILITY FEE PAYMENT TO INCENTIVIZE DEVELOPMENT UNDER CERTAIN
SPECIFIED CONDITIONS; SECTION 122-6, ENTITLED "APPLICATION FOR
CONCURRENCY MITIGATION REVIEW AND MOBILITY FEES," TO ESTABLISH
PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING CONCURRENCY MITIGATION AND
MOBILITY FEES; AND SECTION 122-7, ENTITLED "ENFORCEMENT AND
PENALTIES,"TO ESTABLISH ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES;
ESTABLISHING ARTICLE II, ENTITLED "CONCURRENCY," SECTION 122-11,
ENTITLED "LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS," TO ESTABLISH LEVELS OF
SERVICE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN; AND SECTION 122-12, ENTITLED "DETERMINATION OF
CONCURRENCY," TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE CALCULATION OF
CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS AND CAPACITY CREDITS; ESTABLISHING
ARTICLE III, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEES," SECTION 122-21, ENTITLED
"LEGISLATIVE INTENT," TO PROVIDE THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR,
AND INTENT OF,THE MOBILITY FEE PROGRAM; SECTION 122-22, "ADOPTION
OF MOBILITY FEE STUDY," TO INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH MOBILITY FEE TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, DATED AUGUST 2018;
SECTION 122-23, "IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF MOBILITY FEES," TO
ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF
MOBILITY FEE; SECTION 122-24, "CALCULATION OF MOBILITY FEES," TO
ESTABLISH MOBILITY FEES AND THE METHODOLOGY FOR THE
Page 1 of 32
Page 1520 of 2557
CALCULATION OF MOBILITY FEES; SECTION 122-25, "ALTERNATIVE
INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FEE STUDY," TO CREATE A PROCEDURE FOR THE
REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FEE STUDIES TO
DETERMINE THE IMPACT AND MOBILITY FEES FOR LAND USES NOT DEFINED
IN THE CODE; SECTION 122-26, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE LAND USES," TO
ESTABLISH SCHEDULE OF LAND USES FOR THE CALCULATION OF MOBILITY
FEES; SECTION 122-27, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT DISTRICT," TO
DESIGNATE THE ENTIRE CITY AS A MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT DISTRICT;
SECTION 122-28, ENTITLED "MOBILITY FEE FUND ESTABLISHED," TO
ESTABLISH A MOBILITY FEE FUND; SECTION 122-29, ENTITLED "USE OF
MOBILITY FEE FUND," TO SPECIFY PERMITTED USES OF MOBILITY FEE
PROCEEDS; AND AMENDING "APPENDIX A— FEE SCHEDULE," TO PROVIDE
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY FEE
REVIEW; AND PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY,
CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida
Statutes,the City of Miami Beach (the"City")has the home rule authority to adopt a transportation
impact assessment program; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166, Florida
Statutes, the City also has the authority to adopt ordinances relating to the budgeting and
expenditure of City funds; and
WHEREAS, the City has broad home rule powers to adopt ordinances to provide for and
operate transportation systems, including roadways, transit facilities, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities
within the City; and
WHEREAS, in 1999, the City Commission adopted the City's 1999 Municipal Mobility Plan;
and
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2000, the City Commission adopted Resolution 2000-23874 which
adopted concurrency mitigation fees(and associated administrative fees)to fund projects in the 1999
Municipal Mobility Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, entitled 'Concurrency," authorizes local
governments to repeal transportation concurrency and encourages them to adopt an alternative
mobility funding system, including a mobility fee program; and
WHEREAS, the City worked with consultants to prepare a Mobility Fee Technical Analysis
pursuant to Policy 1.5 of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHER AS, a Mobility Fee Technical Analysis was prepared in August 2018 by Keith &
Schnars and NUE Urban Concepts, and provides the rationale for the proposed fees; and
WHEREAS, the proposed mobility fee-based funding system complies with the dual rational
nexus test applicable to impact fees; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, requires the Comprehensive Plan to
contain a capital improvements element which shall, among other things, provide for standards
to ensure the availability and adequacy of public facilities, as well as projected revenues to fund
the facilities; and
Page 2 of 32
Page 1521 of 2557
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2016, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2016-
29371, adopting the 2016 Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the revenue from the mobility fee created herein will be used to implement
projects set forth in the 2016 Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan, which serves as the basis
for the fee; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are necessary to accomplish all of the above
objectives.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA THAT:
SECTION 1.Chapter 118,entitled"Administration and Review Procedures,"Article VI,entitled"Design
Review Procedures," at Section 118-253, entitled "Application for design review," is amended as
follows:
CHAPTER 118
ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES
ARTICLE VI. -DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES
*
Sec. 118-253. -Application for design review.
* * *
(d) All applications involving demolition, new building construction, alteration, rehabilitation,
renovation, restoration or any other physical modification of any building, structure,
improvement, landscape feature, public interior or site in accordance with section 118-252 of
the Miami Beach Code shall be on a form provided by the planning department and shall
include such information and attached exhibits as the board and the planning department
determine are needed to allow for complete evaluation of the proposed demolition,
construction and other physical improvements, alterations or modifications including, but not
limited to,the following:
* * *
(9) ` - --- -_ .- - .• - . • - - - - - _ - - _ - --
Commercial and mixed-use developments over
5,000 gross square feet and multi-family projects with more than four (4) units or
15,000 gross square feet shall submit a transportation analysis and mitigation plan,
prepared by a professional traffic engineer,_licensed and registered in the State of
Florida. The analysis and plan shalt at a minimum provide the following:
A. Details on the impact of projected traffic on the adjacent corridors, intersections,
and areas to be determined by the City.
Page 3 of 32
Page 1522 of 2557
B. Strategies to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent
transportation network, to the maximum extent feasible, in a manner consistent
with the adopted Transportation Master Plan and adopted mode share goals.
C. Whenever possible, driveways shall be minimized and use common access points to
reduce potential turn movements and conflict points with pedestrians.
D. Applicable treatments may includes without limitation,transportation demand management
strategies included in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
#olowing--instances
et•
13, For that propose n increase in floor area,a►
to-time,
to
;-arid
SECTION 2.Chapter 118,entitled"Administration and Review Procedures,"Article X,entitled"Historic
Preservation," Division 3, entitled "Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness/Certificate to
Dig/Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition," at Section 118-562, entitled "Application," is
amended as follows:
ARTICLE X. -HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DIVISION 3. - ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1 CERTIFICATE TO DIG/
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION
Sec. 118-562. -Appllcatinn.
: t
(b) All applications involving demolition, new building construction, alteration, rehabilitation,
renovation, restoration or any other physical modification of any building, structure, improvement,
landscape feature, public interior or site individually designated in accordance with sections 118-
591, 118-592 and 118-593, or located within an historic district shall be on a form provided by the
planning department and shall include such information and attached exhibits as the board and
the planning department determine are needed to allow for complete evaluation of the proposed
Page 4 of 32
Page 1523 of 2557
demolition, construction and other physical improvements, alterations or modifications including,
but not limited to,the following:
t
(9) ' . • - • - •• - - - - - - -- - •• .. . _
• • .- •_ - - Commercial and mixed-use
developments over 5,000 gross square feet and multi-family projects with more than
four (4) units or 15,000 gross square feet shall submit a transportation analysis and
mitigation plan,prepared by a professional traffic engineer, licensed and registered in
the State of Florida. The analysis and plan shall at a minimum provide the following:
A. Details on the impact of projected traffic on the adjacent corridors, intersections,
and areas to be determined by the City.
B. Strategies to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent
transportation network, to the maximum extent feasible, in a manner consistent
with the adopted Transportation Master Plan and adopted mode share goals.
C. Whenever possible, driveways shall be minimized and use common access points to
reduce potential turn movements and conflict points with pedestrians,
D. Applicable treatments may include,without limitation.transportation demand management
strategies included in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Instate:
• • - • ••• - • - - - f. • ... ._ . _ .
to-time-
• - - - -- • _ fwe t utor
SECTION 3. Chapter 122, entitled"Concurrency Management," is amended as follows:
CHAPTER 122
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY FEES
Page 5 of 32
Page 1524 of 2557
. .•
vieifeFc
vieriter6;
■
Page 6 of 32
Page 1525 of 2557
Page 7 of 32
Page 1526 of 2557
with thjs-Gode-
.
shapkw
.. • --
Page 8 of 32
Page 1527 of 2557
'zi.-
e4
Page 9 of 32
Page 1528 of 2557
•
•
•
- : - ' - •• !• • : - - _ =
•
6ARGI:ig" - - • t - :• . -• - •. . _ •. . -
e`
whic1-fit': - _ • - : :• : • : -- -- - ' - +..
•
, . - - - - : :••• - - - . - = -
Page 10 of 32
Page 1529 of 2557
demelisheci
•
- - - _ - . . - • • . : - 21••. --
4be-granted-by the
such-pragfa
a .. ..
Page 11 of 32
Page 1530 of 2557
•
parking- ►hhee.
Page 12 of 32
Page 1531 of 2557
Page 13 of 32
Page 1532 of 2557
ARTICLE I. -PURPOSE AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 122-1. - Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that all development which increases the demand for
public facilities in the city will be served by adequate public facilities in accordance with the
levels of service which are established in the capital improvements element of the
comprehensive plan of the city and the city's municipal mobility plan.
$ec. 122-2. -Definitions.
The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Applicable Review Department means the department or agency that is charged with reviewing
a particular level of service for the purposes of concurrency review and mitigation calculation or the
calculation and Collection of mobility fees.
Available capacity means public facility capacity less capacity used by existing development,final
reservations of capacity made in connection with the payment of applicable fees, and issuance of
certificates of occupancy and short-term reservations of capacity made in connection with the issuance
of approved development orders.
Capacity credit means a credit for certain existing or demolished improvements toward
concurrency requirements for future development.
Densities and intensities of development means a numerical measurement of the size and
scope of a proposed development based on the following units of measurement:
(1) Nonresidential developments: The number of square feet of gross floor area or seats,
as applicable;
al Residential developments: The number of dwelling units or the number of square feet
of floor area, as applicable.
j} Hospitals and clinics.' The number of beds, and/or the number of square feet of gross
floor area as applicable:
al Educational facilities: The number of students, or floor area, as applicable
(5) Hotels and motels:The number of rooms, and
ll Service stations.' The number of gasoline dispensing pumps and size of mini-mart.
Page 14 of 32
Page 1533 of 2557
Development order means any order, unless otherwise exempt from the provisions of this
chapter, granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for zoning approval,
building permit, division of land/lot split, rezoning, conditional use, design review, certificate of
appropriateness, variance, sidewalk café permit, certificate of use, business tax receipt, other
design approval, or any other official action having the effect of permitting the development of
land which exceeds the density and/or intensity of development which exists on the subject
property at the time of application.
Estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fee means an estimate of required
concurrency mitigation or payment of mobility fees that is required prior to the approval of a
development order.
Mitigation program means an undertaking to provide, or cause to be provided, required
public improvements, which undertaking is legally enforceable by the city and which ensures
that needed public improvements will be timely constructed or that the adverse impacts of a
diminution in level of service are substantially mitigated.
Mobility fee means an impact fee on new development and increases in density and/or
intensity, based on the calculation_of predicted vehicles miles traveled (VMT).
Multimodal transportation means surface transportation system that includes all motorized and
non-motorized manners of travel.
Origin and Destination Adjustment Factor means a factor of 0.5. Trip generation rates represent
trip-ends at the site of a land use. Thus, a single-origin trip from a residence to a workplace counts
as one trip-end for the residence and one trip-end for the workplace, for a total of two trip-ends. To
avoid double-counting of trips, the PMT for each land use shall be multiplied by 0.5. This distributes
the impact of travel equally between the origin and destination of the trip, and eliminates double
charging for trips.
Person Miles of Travel(PMT) means the number of miles traveled by each person on a trio.
Person Miles of Travel rate means the unit cost per additional person-mile of travel used in
developing the mobility fee schedule.
Person Trips means a calculation of vehicle trips, as multiplied by an average vehicle
occupancy.
Public facilities mean the facilities for which the city has adopted levels of service, including
potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, flood protection, stormwater management, and parks
and recreational facilities.
Trip generation means the maximum number of daily trips generated for an applicable land use
type.
Vehicle Miles of Travel(VMT) means the movement of one privately operated vehicle for one
mile, regardless of the number of people in the vehicle.
Page 15 of 32
Page 1534 of 2557
Sec. 122-3. -Concurrency mitigation and mobility fee required.
Concurrency mitigation and mobility fees, if applicable, are required for all projects that increase the
density and/or intensity of a site, including a building and/or use on a site. Unless exempt under the
provisions of flection 122-5 hereof:
No development order pew shall be granted unless the applicant has obtained a valid
estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees;
1)1 No development order shall be issued unless the applicant has proof of payment for all
applicable concurrency mitigation and mobility fees.
Sec. 122-4. -Concurrency mitigation and mobility fee review.
Concurrency mitigation review and mobility fee calculations shail be provided upon filing a request
with the Applicable Review Department. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this
chapter shall not be construed to restrict Applicable Review Departments other than departments
of the City of Miami Beach from establishing alternative review procedures. Applicable Review
Departments for developments in the City shall include the following:
1j Potable water- Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Public Works Department.as applicable.
all Sanitary sewer - Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Public Works Department, as
applicable.
Solid waste- Miami Beach Public Works Department.
.(Al Storm water- Miami Beach Public Works Department.
re Recreation and open space - Miami Beach Planning Department.
M Mobility fees- Miami Beach Planning Department.
.(al Public schools- Miami Dade County Public Schools.
Sec. 122-5. -Exemptions from concurrency mitigation and mobility fees.
The following types of development are not required to undergo concurrency review or pay a mobility
fee pursuant to this chapter:
ja1 Any development undertaken by the city that does not require a rezoning, does not increase in
intensity, does not include an_associated change of use, or that increases the city's ability to
provide essential services and facilities related to health and safety concerns(fire. police, etc.).
u Any application that does not propose to increase intensity and/or density of a site.
Lcl Temporary uses in public rights-of-way, as determined by the city commission by resolution,
specifying aeographic areas, criteria, and duration of exemption, where such uses front on or
are north of 63rd Street, on Washington Avenue from 6th Street to Lincoln Road, or in the
Collins Park Arts District Overlay (as defined in section 142-854).
Page 16 of 32
Page 1535 of 2557
j Uses at the North Shore BandsheII, the Ronald W. Shane Watersports Center, and the Miami
Beach Botanical Garden, as determined by the city commission by resolution.
(e) Uses located on lots with a GU zoning designation fronting on Collins Avenue between 79th
Street and 87th Street, as determined by the city commission by resolution.
Sec. 122-6. -Application for concurrency mitigation review and mobility fees.
fal For those concurre.ncy and mobility requirements for which the Miami Beach Planning
Department is the Applicable Review Department, an applicant may file an application for an
estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees prior to filing an application for a
development order, :'- - ----•' , -- •-- - - - -- :: - := : or at any other
time, in order to obtain information on the availability of public facilities for a parcel of land.
u An application for an estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees shall include such
information as required by the city including, without limitation, the following information:
1I) Name of applicants
11), Location. size, legal description. folio number, and existing use of the parcel or portion
thereof proposed for development
L1 A description Qf the use, density, and intensity of use for existing and proposed
development, with adequate supporting information and studies, which may include a
building permit application, certificate of occupancy, certificate of use, business tax
receipts, or other documentation, as applicable;
al Schedule for phased developments;
n Description of any proposed on-site or off-site infrastructure improvements,
j Any building permit documents that may be required by the Planning Department;
fl The date of demolition permit,if applicable;
Any other documents which may be requested by the Planning Department; and
1.9) An administrative fee, as set forth in Appendix A to this code, to offset the actual costs of
the City's review of an application for an estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility
fees.
Lc). Within ten days after receipt of an application for_goncurrency mitigation review and mobility
fees, each Applicable Review Department shall determine whether the application is complete.
If the application is determined to be incomplete,the Applicable Review Department shall notify
the applicant in writing that the application is incomplete and shall identify the additional
information required to be submitted. Until all required information is provided and an
application is determined to be complete, an Applicable Review Department shall take no
further action in regard to the application.
Sec. 122-7.— Enforcement and penalties.
Page 17 of 32
Page 1536 of 2557
(a) Any person, firm, corporation, or partnership that violates (or aids in a violation of) any provision
of this chapter may be subject to enforcement.as outlined herein.
u A violation of this chapter includes, but is not limited to. the failure, neglect, or refusal to pay a
mobility fee:provide or perform all obligations pursuant to a concurrency miti�l.ation program; pay
a concurrency mitigation fee as required by this chapter; or a failure or refusal to comply with any
other provision of this chapter. A violation of this chapter shall also include furnishing untrue,
incomplete,false,or misleading information on any document, or to any city employee, concerning
ci) the calculation, exemption, or payment of a mobility fee or concurrency mitigation fee: (ii) the
entitlement to a refund; or (iii) the proposal, negotiation, terms, or performance of obligations
pursuant to a concurrency mitigation program or agreement.
Penalties and enforcement.
fl A violation of this chapter shall be subject to the following civil fines, in addition to any
outstanding fees owed pursuant to this chapter:
a If the violation is the first violation, a person or business shall receive a civil fine of
$1,000.00;
b. If the violation is the second violation within the preceding six months, a person or
business shall receive a civil fine of$2,000.00;
c. If the violation is the third violation within the preceding six months, a person or
business shall receive a civil fine of$3,000.00;
d. If the violation is the fourth or subsequent violation within the preceding six months, a
person or business shall receive a civil fine of$4,000.00.
Enforcement. The code compliance department shall enforce this section. This shall not
preclude other law enforcement agencies from any action to assure compliance with this
section and all applicable laws. If a violation of this section is observed, the code enforcement
officer will be authorized to issue a notice of violation. The notice shall inform the violator of
the nature of the violation, amount of fine for which the violator is liable, instructions and due
date for paying the fine, that the violation may be appealed by requesting an administrative
hearing before a special master within ten (10)days after service of the notice of violation,and
that the failure to appeal the violation within ten (10) days of service shall constitute an
admission of the violation and a waiver of the right to a hearing.
0.1 Rights of violators:payment of fine;right to appear, failure to pay civil fine or to appeal;appeals
from decisions of the special master.
a. A violator who has been served with a notice of violation must elect to either.
i. pay the civil fine in the manner indicated on the notice of violation; or
ii. request an administrative hearing before a special master to appeal the notice
of violation,which must be requested within ten (10)days of the service of the
notice of violation.
_, The procedures for appeal by administrative hearing of the notice of violation shall be
as set forth in sections 30-72 and 30-73 of this Code. Applications for hearings must
Page 18 of 32
Page 1537 of 2557
be accompanied by a fee as approved by a resolution of the city commission, which
shall be refunded if the named violator prevails in the appeal.
c. If the named violator, after issuance of the notice of violation, fails to pay the civil fine,
or fails to timely request an administrative hearing before a special master,the special
master may be informed of such failure by report of the code enforcement officer. The
failure of the named violator to appeal the decision of the code enforcement officer
within the prescribed time period shall constitute a waiver of the violator's right to an
administrative hearing before the special master, and shall be treated as an admission
of the violation,for which fines and penalties shall be assessed accordingly.
d. A certified copy of an order imposing a fine may be recorded in the public records, and
thereafter shall constitute a lien upon any real or personal property owned by the
violator,which may be enforced in the same manner as a court judgment by the sheriffs
of this state, including levy against the violator's real or personal property, but shall not
De deemed to be a court judgment except for enforcement purposes. On or after the
§ixty-firs](61st) day following the recording of any such lien that remains unpaid, the
City may foreclose or otherwise execute upon the lien.
e. Any party aggrieved by a decision of a special master may appeal that decision to a
court of competent jurisdiction.
f. The special master shall be prohibited from hearing the merits of the notice of violation
or considering the timeliness of a request for an administrative hearing if the violator
has failed to request an administrative bearing within ten (10) days of the service of
the notice of violation.
The special master shall not have discretion to alter the penalties prescribed in
subsecti n (c)(1).
In addition to enforcement of this division through issuance of a violation, the city may withhold
issuan - of he -rtificate .f occu.-nc .-i .-t- • = or Chane of use a••royal and/or •rin.
suit to restrain, enjoin, or otherwise prevent violation of this chapter in any court of competent
jurisdiction, to recover costs incurred by the city in whole or in part because of a violation of this
chapter, and/or to compel payment of a mobility fee or concurrency mitigation fee pursuant to this
charter. Issuance of and/or payment of a citation for violation of this division does not preclude
the city from filing such a suit. Payi gent of any penalties imposed does not release a person or
entity from payment of the mobility fee due or cojicurrencv iti io 1 but shall be payable in
addition to the mobility fee r oncurfency gation.
Secs. 122.8-122-10. -Reserved.
ARTICLE II. -CONCURRENCY
Sec. 122-11. -Level of service standards.
Lai A determination of concurrency for recreation and gpen space, potable water. sanitary sewer,
solid waste,public schools, and storm water management facilities shall be based on the levels
of service established in the capital improvements element of the comprehensive plan of the
city,at the time the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services. The
City of Miami Beach is designated as a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA)
Page 19 of 32
Page 1538 of 2557
and, as such, all development and redevelopment is exempt from a obtaining a determination
of transportation concurrency; however, development shall be subject to the payment of a
mobility fee, unless otherwise provided in this chapter.
For the purposes of a determination of concurrency, potable water,sanitary sewer, solid waste,
and storm water managementfacilities shall be deemed available if they are:
In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency,
Funded, programmed. and scheduled to be available by_the applicable city, state, or other
governmental agency at the time the proposed development is_proiectectto generate a
demand for services; or
The subject of an enforceable mitjgation program between the applicant and the city or
other applicable agency, which will ensure that the facilities will be provided at the time the
proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services,
(c For the purposes of a determination of concurrency, recreation and open space facilities shall
be deemed available if they are:
Ltj In existence at the time of a determination of concurrency.
ll) Funded. programmed, and scheduled to be available by the applicable city, state, or other
governmental agency at the time the proposed development is projected to generate a
demand for services: or
The subject of an enforceable mitigation program between the applicant and the city or
other applicable gpvemmental agency, which will ensure that the facilities will be provided
at the time the proposed development is projected to generate a demand for services. or
(4) Programmed or otherwise committed to be provided as soon as reasonably possible such
that a substandard level of service does not exist for a period of more than one (1) year
after the_proposed development is protected to generate a demand for services; or
A proportionate fair-share concurrency mitigation fee is paid which will allow the City to
build the facilities for which there is a substandard level of service.
Sec. 122-12. - Determination of concurrency.
fal As part of an application for a development order that increases the density or intensity of a
site, as applicable, each Applicable Review Department shall make a determination of
Concurrency in accordance with section 122-26 as to whether rPguired public facilities are or
will be available when needed to serve the proposed development; determine the effective
period during which such facilities will be available to serve the proposed development; and
issue an invoice for necessary concurrency mitigation fees or identify other mitigation
measures.
(b) Capacity credits shall be given for legally established uses as follows:
u For existing structures that have an active use, the current use shall be used as the basis
for calculating capacity credits.
Page 20 of 32
Page 1539 of 2557
For vacant structures or structures undergoing construction, the last active use shall be
used as the basis for calculating capacity credits.
j) For vacant land, the last active use shall be used as the basis for calculating capacity
credits, provided the activity has not been inactive for more than ten (10) years.
In the event the determination is made that the required public facilities will not be available
where needed to serve the proposectdevelopment, an applicant for concurrency mitigation may
propose a mitigation program in order to avoid a negative determination of concurrency. The
proposed mitigation program shall be based on the same methodology utilized by the
Applicable Review Department for determining concurrency, and shall include a specific
delineation of responsibilities for providing the required public facility improvements adequate
methods for securing performance of the mitigation program, payment of mitigation funds, and
a proposed recapture program for the provision of excess capacity, if applicable. Such
mitigation program shall be reviewed and, if the program satisfies the concurrency
requirements herein, the program shall be approved by the Applicable Review Departments of
the city and other agencies having iurisdiction. The applicant shall enter into a mitigation
agreement with the city, committing to the mitigation program_which agreement shall be
subiect to the review and approval of the city attorney.
jd? If the Applicable Review Department determines that the required public facilities are or will be
available to serve the proposed development as provided in section 122-11, the Applicable
Review Department shall issue a finding of concurrency mitigation which shall be effective for
a period of one (1) year from the date of the issuance of the determination, unless otherwise
specified in the finding. An extension of this one-year period may be granted by the Applicable
Review Decartment for an additional six (6) months, provided that an application for a, city
development order is being diligently pursued, and provided that an extension is requested
within the original one-year period. In the event the issuance of a concurrency mitigation
certificate is based on an approved mitigation program, such certificate shall be expressly
conditioned upon compliance with such program.
Lei A determination of concurrency mitigation will expire within one (1) year of issuance, unless a
building permit is obtained or a mitigation fee is paid. This one-year period for a reservation of
capacity, may be extended one time for an additional year for good cause shown, provided that
an application to the Applicable Review Department for an extension is made within the original
one-year period.
i'h If a mitigation fee is paid and the development does not receive a building permit, or the use
does not become legally established, a refund can only be requested within one (1)year ofthe
date of payment.
jg. If the Applicable Review Department determines that the reauiredpublic facilities are not and
will not be available to serve the proposed development, and that an acceptable mitigation
program has not been provided, the Applicable Review Department shall issue a notice of
,gative determination of deficiency and
the improvements or fair-share concurrency mitigation payment necessary to allow the
development to proceed. If a notice of negative determination is rendered, no further review
of any associated applications for development order shall be conducted unless or until a new
or modified application of an estimate of concurrency mitigation and mobility fees is filed, and
a determination of concurrency is made.
Page 21 of 32
Page 1540 of 2557
(.h� Applicable Review Departments other than departments or agencies of the City of Miami Beach
may utilize alternative procedures from those identified in this section to determine
concurrency.
Secs. 122.13-122.20. - Reserved.
ARTICLE 3. -MOBILITY FEES
Sec. 122-21. -Legislative intent.
The City Commission hereby finds, determines, as declares as follows:
f Pursuant to Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 166 Florida Statutes,the city has
broad home rule powers to adopt ordinances t4 provide for and operate transportation systems,
including roadways, transit facilities. and bicycle/pedestrian facilities within the city.
u The Community Planning Act, at Section 163.3180(5)(i), Florida Statutes (as may be amended
from time to times,provides for mobility fees, based on an adopted transportation mobility plan, as
an alternative means by which local governments may allow development consistent with an
adopted Comprehensive Plan to equitably mitigate transportation impact.
j_c) Section 163.3100(V), Florida Statutes, requires that a mobility fee must be based upon an
adopted transportation mobility plan. The City of Miami Beach has adopted a Transportation
Master Plan, identifying a prioritized list of multimodal improvements, which serves_as the basis
for the mobility fee imposed. The Master Plan provides an analysis of existing traffic conditions
and travel characteristics.The existing citywide mode share is as follows, pursuant to the adopted
City of Miami Beach 2016 Transportation Master Plgn:
Existing Citywide Mode Share
56.5C,c
JIVE 14f%' 5.541 12;o
PRIVATE TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN BIKE OTHER
VEHICLES
(11 The City has established a Citywide mode share goal that seeks to reduce travel by motor vehicle
and increase the share of travel made by riding transit, walking, and riding a bicycle. The list of
multimodal improvements established in the Transportation Master Plan are intended to address
future citywide travel demand and achieve the City's 2035 mode share goals. as follows:
2036 Mode Share Vision
Page 22 of 32
Page 1541 of 2557
43-':
20c,': I7E 8u,. 22<<'
PRIVATE TRANSIT WALKING BIKING OTHER
VEHICLES
Lel The city's mobility fee program, established gursuant to this chapter shall be effective ninety (90)
days following the adoption of this Ordinance. Developments that have obtained a land use board
approval, or a building permit process number, prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall
be subject to the concurrency requirements applicable prior to the effective date of the mobility fee
program.
Page 23 of 32
Page 1542 of 2557
Sec. 122-22. -Adoption of moblllty fee study.
The City.Commission hereby adopts and incorporates the following study by reference hereto:
The mobility fee study, entitled "City of Miami Beach Mobility Fee Technical Analysis," and dated
August 2018, including without limitation the assumptions, conclusions, and findings in such study as
to the methodology for the calculation of the city's mobility fee and the trip generation rates assigned
to various land use categories.
Sec. 122-23. - Imposition and collection of mobility fees.
{ Mobility fees shall be assessed upon the issuance of a building permit or change of use for any
development within the city. Mobility fees shall be calculated in the manner set forth in section
122-26 hereof and the mobility fee study referenced in section 122-22.
Mobility fees assessed in connection with the itssuance of a development order shall be
collected and paid prior to or concurrent with the issuance of the building permit.
(2) Mobility fees assessed in connection with a change of use shall be collectedand paid prior to
issuance of the certificate of use, business tax receipt, or other similar approval. The mobility
fee shall be computed at the difference between the rate established in the mobility fee
schedule for the proposed use and the rate established in the mobility fee schedule for the
current use.
Modifications to an existing use and changes of use which do not result in a higher assessment
under the mobility fee schedule shall be exempted from payment of the mobility fee.
The city shall also require a site-specific multimodal transportation analysis and mitigation plan
pursuant to the applicable land use board application requirements set forth in chapter 118.
Sec. 122-24. •Calculation of mobility fee.
The calculation of the mobility fee requires the adjustment of the Person Miles of Travel (PMT) for
each land use by the Origjn and Destination Adjustment Factor (ODAF). The ODAF is equal to
0.5. Trip generation rates represent trip-ends at the site of a land use. Thus, a single-origin trip
from a residence to a workplace counts a5 one trip-end for the residence and one trip-end ,or the
workplace, for a total of two trip-ends. To avoid double-counting of trips, the PMT for each Jand
use shall be multiplied by 0.5. This distributes the impact of travel equally between the origin and
destination of the trip, and eliminates double charging for trips. The PMT for each land use begins
with the entering and exiting daily trips for each land use. The adiusted PMT is then multiplied by
the PMT rate of$129.37 to determine the 'nobility fee rateper each land use on the mobif iy fee
schedule.
The formulas for each step in the calculation of the mobility fee are as follows:
Page 24 of 32
Page 1543 of 2557
Person Trips (PTI per Land Use = (TG x 'o NEW) x PMT Factor
Person Trips(PT) by Mode = PT x MS for each of the five modes of travel
Person Mile of Travel (PMT)per Land Use = SUM of(PT by Mode ' TL by MODE
Person Mile of Travel (PMT)Rate = $129 37 per PMT
Mobility Fee (MF)per Land Use = (PMT ' ODAFr ' PMT RT
Whero.
PT = Person Trips
PMTF = Person Miles of Travel Factor of 1 33 to account for
multi-modal travel
TG = Daily Trip Generation during average weekday
�G NEW _ Percent of trips that are primary trips. as opposed to
pass-by or diverted-link trips
MS = Mode Share Goals per Miami Beach Transporlatior
Plan for each of the five modes of travel
TL = Average length of a trip by Mode and by Trip Purpose
PMT = Person Miles of Travel
PMT RT = Person Miles of Travel Rate =5129 37
ODAF = Origin and Destination Adjustment Factor of 50 to
avoid double-counting trips for origin and destination
MF = Mobility Fee calculated by (PMT x 50) x PMT RT
Lc). The adopted mobility fee for each land use category are set forth in "Schedule A," below:
Schedule A—Mobility Fee
Mobility Fee Schedule Unit of I Mobility
Category/Land Use Tvgo Measure Fee
Residential
Single Family,ysq a unit size less than 3,500 sq. ft.-of-144w I
a__' Per nit I 1847
Single Familyldth a unit size between 3.500 and 7,000 sq. ft.-of
PerUU it ` 2461
Single Family whiLaiinkiks greater than 7,000 sq. ft.-ef-ice
R ' Per Unit I $3.076
Multi Family Apartments Per Unit $1,515
Affordable I Hosus_.ing { Rea_Unit
Workforce!tpusin. Per Unit I $758
Page 25 of 32
Page 1544 of 2557
Co-living/ Micro Apartmentsi PerUnit $113fi
Recreation &Entertainment
_.Manna (Including dry storage) Per Berth_ 308
Golf Course Per Hole $3,$81
_Movie Theater Per Screen $22,823
Outdoor Commercial Recreation2 Per Acre $1,829
Community Center/Civic/Gallery/ Lodge/Museum Per Sq. Ft. $1.86
indoor Commercial Recreation I Health Club/Fitness Per Sq. Ft.. ; $4.54
Institutional
Continuing Care Facility/Nursing Home /Memory Care/
Congregate are Facility/Assisted /Independent Living Per Bed 740
Private School (Pre-K-12) Per Sa. Ft. 1219
Place of Worship. including ancillary & accessory buildings Per Sa. Ft. 51.14
Day Care Center Per Sg. Ft. 3.87
Industrial
Warehousing I Manufacturing/Industrial/Production (under
roof) _ Per So. Ft. 1.53
Mini-Warehousing I Boat/RVs& Other Outdoor Storage3 Per Sg. Ft. 0.46
Distribution/Fulfillment Center/Package Delivery Hub Per Sq. Ft, $2.14
Office
General Office/ Research/Higher Education/ Financial /Bank Per Sg. Ft. 3.33
Medical/De tal/Cli is/Veterina / Hos s ital , Per Sq. Ft. $7.60
Service I Retail/Non-Residential _
T
Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services' Per Sa. Ft. 10.11
Pharmacy/Dispensary/Pain Management Clinic Per Sq. Ft. $15.40
Supermarket Per Sg. Ft. 16.37~
Takeout Restaurant with no seating5 Per Sq. Ft, 11. 7
Restaurant with seating5 Per Seat $877
Per Drive-
Restaurant drive-thru5 Thru $9,110
Bar/ Nigh Club/Pub without food service Per Sq. Ft. $26.12
Motor Vehicle& Boat Sales/ /Repair!Cleaning l Parts Per Sg. Ft. 6.26
Hotel/Lodgings .Per Room $1,721. ,
Convenience Retail' Per Sq. Ft. $19.4$
' Per Fuel
,Motor Vehicle Fueling Position $6,413
Per Drive
Thru Lane
Bank Dnve-Thni Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Thru and/or Per
Lane8 ATM $12,170
Notes:
'Floor area is based on.,areas that ggunt tQwerd&the maxim up unit size Ruiausnt toslie
sinala-fanilly__district 'agulatlons. - . . . _
Page 26 of 32
Page 1545 of 2557
The sq. ft. for any buildings or structure shall not be excluded from the acreage. _
3Acreaae for any unenclosed material and vehicle storage shall be converted to sq. ft.
4Areas under canopy for seating, display storage and sales shall be converted to SQ. ft.
r -
SSeparate fees are associated with any drive-thru lane(s) associated with a restaurant.
8Restaurant/ Bar/ Night Club and/or Retail Sales,-that are not exclusive to hotel quests only,
shall be calculated based on the separate applicable Land Use Classification.
'Convenience Retail rates are separate from the fee due for vehicle fueling positions. Rates per
vehicle fueling_position also apply to gas stations and service stations with fuel pumps. The fee
for any restaurant square footage, seating or drive-thru in a convenience store will be based on
the individual fee rate for the land use, not the convenience store rate.
8Bank building square footage falls under office and is an additive fee beyond the fee due for
bank/ATM drive-thru lanes or free-standing ATM's, These rates are per drive-thru lane for_the
bank and per drive-thru lane with an ATM. The free-standing ATM is for an ATM only and not an
_ATM within or part of another non-fingncial building, such as an ATM within a Arocerstore.
NOTE: The list of uses in the mobility fee schedule is subject to compliance with permitted
uses in the city's land development regulations.
Mobility fee rate. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the mobility fee rates
established above in "Schedule A" shall be automatically adjusted in the future by applying the
percent increase in "Consumer Price Index For All Urban Consumers (CPI-U1, Not Seasonally
Adjusted, U.S. city average for all items (1982-84=100)" (To be known as Annual CPI)_from the
prior year. For reference the 2018 value is 251.107. The CPI adjustment shall never be less than
0.Qpercent. Adjustments shall take place by September 1 of each year, and shall take effect on
October 1 of each year, begnninq in 2020. The adjustment calculation is below:
The change shall be calculated as follows:
("Annual CPI"for Prior Calendar Year minus "Annual CPI" for Calendar Year
Two Years Prior)/(Annual CPI for the Calendar Year Two Years Prior) = "Change
in CPI"
then
("Change in CPI" + 1) * (Fee Currently in Force) _ (New Fee for Next Year).
If the "Change in CPI" is less than 0.0. then 0.0 shall replace the actual "Change
in CPI" in the calculation for that 12-month period.
Schedule A may be adjusted administratively on an annual basis,pursuant to the formula
above_
Incentive Areas. In order to incentivize the revitalization of targeted areas, the City Commission
hereby designates the area of the city north of 63rd Street, as a mobility fee incentive area. Within
the incentive area, a mobility fee reduction of 634{i4 percent shall be provided until Aw 42
August 31, 202
between September 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024, a mobility fee
Page 27 of 32
Page 1546 of 2557
reduction of 38 percent shall be provided; and between September 1, 2024, and August 31, 2025,
a mobility fee reduction of 26 percent shall be provided.
jet A mobility fee administration fee. in the amount identified in Appendix A,shall be assessed. for the
purposes of calculating and processing payment of the mobility fee, as well as to fund future
mobility fee and concurrency studies.
Sec. 122-25.-Alternative independent mobility fee study.
(a) Any applicant whose land use is not listed in the mobility fee schedule shall have the option to
provide an independent mobility fee study prepared in accordance with the methodology outlined
in section 122-24.
(b) The city manager is hereby authorized to reject any independent mobility fee study that does not
meet the standards in section 122-24. The applicant shall provide notice of its intent to provide an
independent mobility fee study not later than sixty days following issuance of the building permit
or approval for a change of use.
Upon submission of the independent mobility fee study the study shall reg_uire a review_at the
applicants expense, pursuant to section 118-6. If the independent mobility fee study cannot be
completed and a final determination of sufficiency made by the city manager, prior to issuance of
the certificate of ocgupancyjor the development, the applicant shall pay the applicable mobility
fee pursuant to the provisions of this article prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy.
However, if the mobility fee study is subsequently accepted by the city manager. following
issuance of the certificate of occupanc)t, a refund shall be made to the applicant to the extent that
the mobility fee paid was higher than the mobility fee determined in the independent mobility fee
study.
Sec. 122-26. -Mobility fee land uses.
Mobility fee calculations shall be based upon the following schedule of land uses, measured per
square foot, unless noted otherwise.
fa) Residential- Per Unit
LI) Single Family with a unit size less than 3,500 sq. ft.-e loon rea
al Single Family_with cun' sazbetween 3,500 and 7,000 sq. ft.-444404wowa
Single Family with a unit size greater than 7,000 sq. ft.-ef flooFafell
C.1) Multi Family Apartments(market rate) - Per Unit
n Affordable PNorhfore4-Housin -Per Unit
Workforce tjousitg-ear Unit
j) Co-living-Pert.lnIt
j) Recreation and Entertainment
al Manna(Including dry storage)- Per Berth
121 Golf Course- Per Hole
j3j Movie Theater- Per Screen
Page 28 of 32
Page 1547 of 2557
IA) Outdoor Commercial Recreation - Per Acre
Community Center/Civic/Gallerv/Lodae/Museum
01 Indoor Commercial Recreation/Health Club/Fitness
fcl Institutional
Continuing Care Facility/ Nursing Home/ Memory Carel Congregate Care Facility/Assisted/
Independent Living-Per Bed
!) Private School (Pre-K-12)
Ll Place of Worship, including ancillary& accessory buildings
Lk Day Care Center
Industrial
Warehousing/Manufacturing/Industrial/Production
u Mini-Warehousina/Boat/RV & Other Outdoor Storage
al Distribution/Fulfillment Center/Package Delivery Hub
u Office
(fl General Office/gesearch/Higher Education/Financial/Bank
!) Medical/Dental/ClinicNeterinary/Hospitals
Lt Service/Retail/Non-Residential
Retail Sales/Personal and Business Services
Pharmacy/Medical Cannabis Treatment Center/Pain Management Clinic
j3� Supermarket
u Takeout Restaurant with no seating
L5.) Restaurant with seating-Per Seat
L6.1~ Restaurant drive-through -Per drive-through
ID Bar/Night Club/Pub without food service
u Motor Vehicle & Boat Sales/Service/ Repair/Cleaning/ Parts
u Hotel/Lodging- Per Room
(10) Convenience Retail
(11) Motor Vehicle Fueling-Per Fuel Position
(12) Bank Drive-Through Lane, Stand Alone ATM or ATM Drive-Through Lane-Per Drive Through
Lane and/or Per ATM. A bank without drive-through lanes or a drivelhrough ATM shall only
be charged a mobility fee based on the office rate. A convenience store without gas pumps
shall only be charged a mobility fee based on the square footage of the convenience store.
Sec. 122-27. -Mobility fee benefit district
Miami Beach shall have a single Citywide Mobility Fee Benefit District.
Page 29 of 32
Page 1548 of 2557
Sec. 122-28. -Mobility fee fund established.
There is hereby established a mobility fee fund for the Mobility Fee Benefit District established in
section 122 281 - hereof. For accounting purposes the mobility fee fund shall be considered a
special revenue fund. Transportation concurrency mitigation funds collected prior to or subsequent to
the adoption of this ordinance shall be deposited into the mobility fee fund. and shall only be used for
the purposes established in section ,O 123-29.
Sec. 122-29. - Use of mlobillty fee fund.
The mobility fee fund shall be used by the city to fund capital expenses associated with
transportation facilities, or portions thereof,that are located in the city, and that are included in the
city's adopted capital improvement plan, transportation master plan, or comprehensive plan, and
shall benefit new development located within the city.
The fund may be used to further the goals of the city to reduce dependence on single-occupant
vehicle trips, and encourage use of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes as a means of
commuting and recreational mobility. Eligible projects may include,without limitation:
Carpools;
!l Van pools;
u Demand response service;
L41 Paratransit seryiceslfor special needs population.);
l51 Public/private provision of transit service, bike sharing, or shared car initiatives;
Provision of short term and long-term bicycle parking, showers, and changing facilities;
Provision of parking for carpools;
{ Alternative hours of travel, including flexible work hours, staggered work shift, compressed
work weeks and telecommuting options;
Subsidy of transit fares;
(10) Use of long-term parking to be developed at or near the city's entry points;
(11) Shared vehicular and pedestrian access for compatible land uses,where possible;
(12) Shared parking agreements for compatible land uses, where possible;
(13) Provision of transit amenities;
(141 Car share vehicle parking;
(15) Traffic management and traffic monitoring programs;
(16) Incident management;
(17) Congestion management;
(18) Access management;
(19) Parking policies which discourage single-occupancy vehicles,
(201 The encouragement of carpools,vanpools, or ndesharing;
Lai Programs or projects that:morove traffic flow, including projects to improve signalization;
(22) On road bicycle lanes, bicycle parking, and bicycle amenities at commercial and residential
uses;
(23) Improve intersections, and implement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) strategies,
including pedestrian oriented intersection design strategies;
(24) Pedestrian countdown signals;
(25) Megians for pedestrian refuge and curb extensions; and
(26) Timing signals to minimize edestrian delay and conflicts,
( If the capital expenses of a transportation facility will be fully paid from the mobile fee fund, the
city manager shall make a written determination that (i) the demand for the transportation facility
Page 30 of 32
Page 1549 of 2557
is reasonably attributable to new development in the city, and (ii) the transportation facility is not
intended to alleviate an existing deficiency in the city's transportation network.
u If a portion of the demand for the transportation facility is reasonably attributable to new
development in the city and a portion of the transportation facility will alleviate an existing
deficiency in the city's transportation network,the city manager shall make a written determination
of the percentage of the transportation facility attributable to new development and that percentaue
of the capital expenses(but not the deficiency portion) may be paid from the mobility fee fund.
iej Any expenditure from a mobility fee fund not specifically authorized by this dMcien article shall be
repaid to the mobility fee fund from lawfully available revenue of the city.
SECTION 5. Appendix A of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, entitled"Fee Schedule," is hereby
amended as follows:
APPENDIX A
FEE SCHEDULE
* *
Annual
Amount Adjustment
Section of (Sales fax (References
shown are
Description or other
this Code takes may defined at
apply) the end of
this
Appendix A)
Subpart B. Land Development Regulations
Chapter 122. Concurrency and Mobility Fees
122-24 Mobility Fee Administration Fee 400.00 j
122 24 Review of Estimate of Concurrency Mitigation and 200.00 } 1
Mobility FeeI I
SECTION 6. APPLICABILITY.
This Ordinance shall not apply to developments that ha""e an approved Order from the Board
of Adjustment, Design Review Board, Historic Preservation Board, or Planning Board issued prior to
the effective date of this Ordinance, or to developments that have been issued a building permit
process number prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. REPEALER.
All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all section and parts of sections in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
SECTION 8. CODIFICATION.
Page 31 of 32
Page 1550 of 2557
It is the intention of the City Commission, and it is hereby ordained, that the provisions of this
Ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, as amended; that
the sections of this Ordinance may be re-numbered or re-lettered to accomplish such intention; and
that the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section"or other appropriate word.
SECTION 9. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder
shall not be affected by such invalidity.
SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect 90 days following adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2019.
Dan Gelber, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk
First Reading: September 11, 2019 APPROVED AS TO FORM
Second Reading:October 16, 2019 AND LANGUAGE
9iJD FIR EXECUTION
Verified by: City Attorney Date
Thomas R. Mooney,AICP
Planning Director
Page 32 of 32
Page 1551 of 2557