2003-25336 Reso
RESOLUTION NO.
2003-25336
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING, PURSUANT
TO MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 118-563, TO GRANT A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION OF FIRE
STATION #4, A DESIGNATED HISTORIC SITE LOCATED AT 6860 INDIAN
CREEK DRIVE, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW THREE BAY FIRE
STATION ON THE SAME SITE.
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2003, the City Commission directed the City Administration to
pursue the demolition of the existing Fire Station #4 based on the fact that the cost for the
relocation of the building was significantly higher than initially estimated; and
WHEREAS, Fire Station #4 is classified as an historic site in the City's Historic
Properties Data Base; and
WHEREAS, demolition of City-owned buildings located within local historic districts
and sites require a Certificate of Appropriateness to be granted by the City Commission;
and
WHEREAS, construction of a new fire station is proposed at the same location as
the existing structure, necessitating either its relocation or demolition, and relocation has
been ruled out based on financial reasons; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Code, Certificates of Appropriateness for such
sites are granted or denied in accordance with the procedures set forth within the
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the procedures for granting or denying a request for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Demolition of a building on an historic site require that the Historic
Preservation Board hold a public hearing and transmit a recommendation to the City
Commission, and it is appropriate that the City Commission then hold a hearing and vote
on the request; and
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2003 the City's Historic Preservation Board held a
public hearing to consider the request, after which the Board voted 4-3 to recommend that
the request be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission hereby set a time certain of 11: 15 a.m.on October 15, 2003 to consider a
request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition of Fire Station #4, a designated
historic site located at 6860 Indian Creek Drive, in order to construct a new three bay fire
station.
"---------
Resolution setting public hearing
to consider issuance of certificate of appropriateness
for demolition of Fire Station #4
PASSED and ADOPTED this 10th
day of
September
,2003.
ATTEST:
n,1\\M~ ~ CLl~
CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 2003-25336
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
~~
VIce- -M OR '
6-OJ-O~
ate
T:IAGENDA\2003\sep1003\regularlFS4 public heanng Raso.doc
2
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CllY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl. OV
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Subject:
Mayor David Dermer and Date: July 2, 2003
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez 4
City Manager~~ .
DISCUSSION REGARDING THE STA REPORT OF THE GENERAL
OBLIGATION BOND FUNDED PROJECT FOR THE REHABILITATION OF
FIRE STATION NO.4.
To:
From:
Previous Status Reports discussed the steps taken by the Administration to obtain
construction permit approval from the City and County regulatory agencies in order to
relocate the historic Fire Station No. 4 building to a southwesterly position on the site
(Phase I), as well as the developments of the design effort for the new Fire Station building
(Phase II). While plans and construction efforts have advanced as anticipated, new
information has been developed that warrants a full City Commission review and
discussion.
Phase I UDdate
The Job Order Contract (JOC) contractor to whom construction documents were submitted
sent its initial cost proposal on June 1 B, 2003 (Attachment 1) for relocation of the existing
historic Fire Station No.4. The contractor proposes to furnish most of the necessary
workmanship, equipment and engineering services for the relocation of the building for the
amount of $664,943.05. This estimate is much higher than the previous projection.
In addition to the costs of relocating the building, as noted below, some level of additional
work will be necessary to structurally shore the building once it is moved. Unfortunately, the
level of work needed cannot be known until the building is fully relocated because this work,
in part, will be needed in order to address existing deficiencies as well as any that occur
incidental to the relocation effort. The complete scope will be identified through a series of
destructive tests, evaluation by the engineer, permitting by the Building Official, and then
work by the contractor. MC Harry and Associates has previously estimated the amount of
this effort to be $125,000.
Additionally, the current cost proposal may be modified when all comments from the
permitting agencies are complete and a new set of revised documents including those
comments are resubmitted to the contractor. There are also additional costs that are not
factored into the number above that must also be considered as the City is likely to incur a
substantial portion, if not all, of them. All costs are outlined in the table below.
Agenda Item
Date
f?fC
7-.;2-03
City Commission Memorandum
July 2, 2003
Fire Station #4 Status Report
Page 2 of 5
1. Building Relocation Costs $
2. Proposed 2% contingency for additional changes required by $
permitting agencies changes or comments
3. Anticipated Structural Repairs (estimate, to be confirmed after $
exploratory tests are performed after building relocation)
4. Special Inspector required by Building Department $
5. 10% Construction Contingency $
6. 4% Professional Fees for The Gordian Group (JOC consulting firm) $
Total Estimated Costs for Relocations $
664,943
13,299
125,000
9,828
80,324
35.775
929,169
Since Phase 1 costs were previously estimated to be $504,596, this presents an additional
shortfall in the range of $425,000 to $450,000.
The difference between the original cost estimate by the Architect and the actual cost of the
Contractor are primarily due to the refinement and development of information and plans at
this point in the process. The added items comprise generally the construction of a
temporary road that would allow the heavy duty moving equipment (with the building) to
transit safely from the building's current location to the specified southwesterly position on
the site. In addition, the water table level in the immediate vicinity of the building would
require the contractor to provide a stabilizing soil base in order to provide a solid
maneuvering platform support for the cranes and jacks used to lift the building. These two
elements were not anticipated in the original cost estimate.
As indicated in previous Project Status Reports, the renovation of the building's interior is
not funded. As a result, it is not included in the current scope of the Project. The current
scope of the Project only relocates the building and provides structural improvements to
stabilize it. The building will not be habitable until further renovations, outside this project,
are completed.
The following analysis is an illustration of the process that will be followed in the event the
City Commission, on July 2, 2003, issues a directive to the Administration to either pursue
additional funding sources to cover the projected deficit or the demolition of the existing
building:
A. Scenario 1: Additional fundina is authorized for the Proiect (see Table 1).
On July 2, 2003, if additional funding is authorized by the Mayor and City Commission to
cover the projected deficit for the Project, those funds would need to be appropriated by
the City Commission during the meeting of July 30, 2003. Consequently, the Phase 1
timeline for construction would be modified as follows:
. July 30, 2003: Presentation of a Resolution to the Mayor and City Commission
for the appropriation of the additional funds.
City Commission Memorandum
July 2, 2003
Fire Station #4 Status Report
Page 3 of 5
. August 2003: Issuance of a Notice to Proceed to the contractor to commence
with the Work.
. December 2003: Anticipated Substantial Completion
. January 2004: Anticipated Project close-out
B. Scenario 2: Additional fundina is not available for the Proiect.
In the event no additional funding is identified for the Project, the Administration, for
illustration, is offering the following options:
Ootion 1 (see Table 2): On July 2, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission may direct the
Administration to put the Project on hold until additional funding sources are identified and
further appropriation is made to cover the projected deficit.
If Phase 1 was put on hold, the timeline for Phase 2, consisting of the construction of the
new Fire Station would also be directly affected since the new building is planned to be
constructed in the same location as the historic building.
Ootion 2 (see Tables 3 and 4): If, on July 2, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission directs
the Administration to pursue the demolition of the existing building, then the project would
need to be presented to the Historic Preservation Board for a recommendation in the HPB
meeting of September 9,2003:
a) The HP Board may revise their initial order to relocate the building and may concur with
the City Commission's decision to demolish the existing Fire Station.
In that event, the impact on the project timeline would be minimal since both phases of
the project would merge and the demolition of the historic Station would be bid as an
integral part of the whole package. The cost for demolition of the entire historic structure
is estimated to be $100,000.
b) On September 9,2003, the HP Board's vote may be contrary to the City Commission's
decision to demolish the building. In that event, the Project would be brought back to
the City Commission on September 10, 2003 or October 15, 2003 for a final decision on
the fate of the building. The cost for demolition of the entire historic structure is
estimated to be $100,000.
If the City Commission decides to override the HP Board's decision, the remaining
project, including demolition, could be issued for bids in Fall 2003, and a Notice to
Proceed could be issued in early 2004.
Phase II UDdate
Concurrent with the Phase I developments noted above, and as indicated in the Project
Status Report of June 11,2003,75% construction documents were submitted for the City's
review by MC Harry and Associates. This review is ongoing.
city Commission Memorandum
July 2, 2003
Fire Station #4 Status Report
Page 4 of 5
During the months of May and June 2003, a series of meetings with Fire Department
personnel were held to review the construction documents for the new building as well as
telecommunications and Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) issues. The latest of
such meetings was held on June 23, 2003, with Fire Department Senior Staff who
expressed legitimate operational concerns regarding the current design limitations caused
by the Project's budgetary constraints and the space constraints ofthe site. The areas of
immediate concern are the Kitchen and Dormitory areas.
In order to address the Fire Department's issues, CIP Staff will revisit specific design issues
with MC Harry and Associates, the City's consultant. It must be noted that possible
solutions may include extending the current building footprint to the South and to the West.
Additional services fees for the consultant to do these changes are anticipated. The
addition of more usable space to the Project would also augment the current deficit. If
funding were made available to implement any changes in the design, a schedule
adjustment of sixty (60) to ninety (90) days is anticipated.
It should be noted that this project has been proceeding in an expedited fashion since final
approval from the Historic Preservation Board was achieved in July 2002. Progress on the
project has been focused on completing design and getting into construction as quickly as
possible, with interior space layouts and ergonomic items taking a secondary priority to
speed. At this point in time, the space, while functional, needs to be "tweaked" by the end
user, the Fire Department, in order to ensure their operational concurrence. Although this
may present an additional 60 to 90 days of time to the current project schedule, this is a
normal adjustment, and an appropriate measure, to do this project right.
If modifications are made to the current design, CIP staff estimates bidding of Phase II will
move from the current projection of September/October 2003 to December 2003/January
2004, with a project construction commencement date moving from January 2004 to March
2004.
At this time, Fire Department personnel, assisted by CIP staff, will prepare a comprehensive
list of FF&E that are presently unfunded. At the commencement of the project, a decision
was made to only include building related construction costs in the capital budget. As a
result, there was no allocation made in the capital budget for FF&E. During recent G.O.
Bond Oversight Committee meetings and City Commission meetings, several expressions
of interest have been made by members to include the FF&E amounts in the discussion of
the overall funding for Fire Station NO.4. For Fire Station No.2, an allocation of $165,000
was set aside for FF&E, suggesting that the respective budgets for the two stations were
treated differently. As an FF&E budget has not yet been established for Fire Station NO.4
and because the FF&E amount for Fire Station No. 2 may not be adequate (the final
number will be determined through future sessions with the Fire Station NO.2 team), staff is
recommending a planning number of $200,000 be used at this time.
As reported in the last Status Report, the current estimate from MC Harry for Phase 2 of the
project (Attachment 2) is $2,250,873. Total construction funding for Phase 2 is $1 ,939,686,
which leaves a current shortfall for Phase 2 at approximately $311,187. As noted above, for
City Commission Memorandum
July 2, 2003
Fire Station #4 Status Report
Page 5 of 5
planning purposes, staff estimates FF&E for the Fire Station No.4 facility to be in the area
of $200,000. This amount is presently being evaluated by staff and is subject to change as
the list is developed.
For Phase 1 and Phase 2, the project is short an estimated $736,187 to $761,187, plus the
amount estimated for FF&E of $200,000, for a total estimated shortfall of $936,000 to
$961,187.
The Administration will continue informing the Mayor and City Commission on the important
events of the Project.
CONCLUSION
Essentially, the current situation represents the convergence of two highly important and
emotional issues: historic preservation and fire safety, respectively. The City has, and
continues to, vigorously support both areas through funding commitments, ordinances, and
policies. In fact, with this project, we have attempted to satisfy both of these policy goals by
trying to preserve a cultural and historic icon that is clearly obsolete as a Fire Station, and
by trying to design a state-of-the-art Fire Station that will serve the North Beach community
for the next 30 to 50 years.
We have, however, reached a crossroads, where it has become clear that the present pot of
funding, $1,939,686, is sufficient to accomplish only one of these two policy goals. We can
choose to add almost $1 million to this project to address both of these policy goals, or we
can decide to revisit the previous discussions on the cultural significance of the historic
building. Please keep in mind that the historic building requires an estimated $770,000 in
additional funds, over and above the $1 million noted above, to make it a useable facility.
With this situation, the Administration can provide the factual and detailed information
needed by the Commission to assist in making such a decision. However, the decision is
one that represents the community's cultural and historic values. While staff can determine
whether or not a building is architecturally significant, whether or not a building reflects the
historic nature of the area, or whether or not the building is a final remaining example of an
architect's work, staff is not in the best position to determine if a building has an intrinsic
value to the community that rises to a level of spending $1.8 million of taxpayer dollars to
preserve.
In considering your decision, please be aware that this highly visible and important project is
"on hold" until a decision is made. The City may be able to allocate sufficient funds from
various reserves, such as the Capital Reserve Fund, to fund both projects. Depending upon
the source of funds, various other issues may arise on our financial rating, operations or
other capital projects. If the Commission wishes to fund these added costs the
Administration will make every effort to work through any of the issues that may arise for a
designated funding source.
JMG/RCMITH/MM
T:\AGENDAI2003~uI0203\reguI8r\ST 4STA TU 7 -02-03.doc
Fl.-Station'"
City Commission Status Report for July 2, 2003
Summary Chart of Optlons
Projected
Estimated Construction Projected
Funding Costs Shortfal Slart Construction Finish
CurrentSitudon
Phase 1 S 504,596 S 929,169 S (424,573) Augusl-03 January-04
Phase 2 S 1,435,090 S l,746,2n S (311,187) January-04 January-05
FF&E (estimated) S S 200,000 $ (200,000)
Tolal $ 1,939.686 S 2,875,446 S (935.760)
TABLE 1
Scenario 1 . Addltlanal Funda Available
Phase 1 $ 929,169 S 929,169 $ August-03 January-04
Phase 2 $ 1,746,277 $ 1,746.277 $ March-04 March-05
FF&E (estimated) S 200,000 $ 200.000 $
Tolal $ 2,875,446 S 2,875,446 $
Action Required by City Commission on July 30. 2003: Appropriation of $935,760 from Capital Reserve Fund. or other source
Assumes additional time on Phase 2 of 90 days to address dormitory and kitchen issues
Assumes additional costs for structural shoring is Iim~ed to AlE estimata of $125,000
TABLE 2
Scenario 2 . No Addlllonal Funda Available
Orion 1
Phase 1 $ 504,596 $
Phase 2 $ 1,435,090 $
FF&E (estimated) $ S
Tolal $ 1,939,686 $
929,169
1,746,2n
200,000
2,875,446
S (424,573)
$ (311,187)
$ (200,000)
$ (935,760)
Plac:ed on Hold
P1ac:ed on Hold
Action Required by City Commission on July 30. 2003: Direction to place projecl on hold
Assumes additional time on Phase 2 of 90 days to address dormitory and kitchen Issues
Assumes additional costs for structural shoring is limited to AlE estimate of $125,000
TABLE 3
Scenario 2 . No Additional Funda Available
ODtion 2A
Phase 1 $ 100,000 $
Phase 2 $ 1,839,686 $
FF&E (estimated) $ $
Total $ 1,939,686 $
100,000
1,746,2n
200,000
2,046,2n
Building demolished with HPB Approval
$
$ 93,409
$ (200,000)
$ (1 06,591)
N1A
March-04
N1A
March-05
Action Required by City Commission on July 30, 2003: Direction to demolish historic building
Action Required by Historic Preservation Board on September 9, 2003: Approval to demolish historic building
Assumes additional time on Phase 2 of 90 days to address dormitory and kitchen issues
Assumes additional costs for structural shoring is limited to AlE estimate of $125,000
TABLE 4
Scanarlo 2 . No Additional Funda Available
Ootlon 2B
Phase 1 $ 100.000 $
Phase 2 $ 1,839.686 $
FF&E (estimated) $ $
Total $ 1.939,686 $
100,000
1.746,277
200.000
2,046.277
Building demolished without HPB Approval
$
$ 93,409
$ (200,000)
$ (lOB,591)
NlA
March-04
N1A
March-05
Action Required by City Commission on July 30. 2003: Direction to demolish historic building
Action Required by Historic Preservation Board on September 9, 2003: Denial to demolish historic building
Action Required by City Commission on October 15, 2003: Override HPB denial and 2nd direction to demolish historic building
Assumes additional time on Phase 2 of 90 days to address dormitory and kitchen issues
Assumes additional costs for structural shoring is limited to AlE estimate of $125,000
~
ATTACHMENT 1
June 18. 2003 COST PROPOSAL DETAIL ~
Job Order Construction Services
Project Number Fire Station N04 relocation -
75.01.02.CIP.OO4.00 City of
Miami Beach
Sect. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
Description
Une Total
Section 01-General Conditions
01152 1122
was - 01000
WBS.01OOO
$4,853.50
CRW 3 PeJ5011 Survey Crew (Surveyor, Rodman. Chainman, Equipment And
Instrumenls)
Quantity
48.00 x
Installation
Unit Price Fact.
97.46 x 1.0375 =
Total
4,853.5080
SUMlY poInlll and PIle layout
01152 1211
waS.OlOOO
was - 01000
01501 1003
waS.01000
was - 01000
EA Install Survey Monument
Quantity
Installation 1.00 x
$57.50
Unit Price Fact. Total
55.43 x 1.0375 = 57.5086
$373.50
Unit Price Fact. Total
80.00 x 1.0375 . 373.5000
MO POIlable Toilets, Chemical
Quantity
Installation 6.00 x
$234.86
01501 2001
waS.01000
was - 01000
EA Construction Sign, (Temporary-Post Mounled)
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 1.00 x 226.38 x 1.0375 =
Total
234.8693
LF
Temporary 8' High Chain Link Fence & Posts, Up To 12 Months, Excluding
Vehicle Gates
Quantity
1,080.00 x
$8,190.85
01530 2003
was - 02000
was - 02000
Installation
Unit Price Fact.
7.31 x 1.0375 =
Total
8,190.8550
EA
Temporary 8' High Chain Link Vehicle Gate & Posts Set In Earth 2 FI Deep,
With Double Rail. Includes Digging Hole & Removal
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
8.00 x 178.58 x 1.0375 =
$1,111.66
01530 2008
was. 02000
was - 02000
Installation
Total
1.111.6605
EA
8' x 6' Temporary Tree Guard. 2x4 Conslruclion. 4 Uprighls Set In Earth 2 Ft
Deep, With Double Rail. Includes Digging Hole & Removal
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
8.00 x 64.80 x 1.0375.
$537.84
01530 2013
was - 01000
was. 01000
Installallon
Total
537.6400
MO
Roiling Scaffolding 14' To 20' Complete With Wheels. Railings. Etc., (5' Wide
X r Long Section)
Quantity
15.00 x
$2,522.21
01610 3003
was - 01000
was - 01000
Installation
Unit Price Facl.
162.07 x 1.0375 =
Total
2,522.2144
G,
Job Order Propo..175.01.02.CIP.OO4.00 Fire Station No4 relocation
Sect. "em Mod. UOM
Wbs User Nate
Description
01630 2014
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
20 CY Dumpster (7 Ton Capacity) "Construction Debris' Note: Price Includes
Service To Deliver And Pick-up Of Dumpster, Hauling Of Debris, Rental Of
Dumpster And Disposal Fee.
Quantity
6.00 x
EA
Installation
Unit Price Fact.
240.00 x 1.0375 '"
Une Total
$1,494.00
Total
1,494.0000
$4,108.50
01630 2015
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
30 CY Dumpster (10 Ton Capacity) 'Construction Debris' Note: Price Includes
Service To Deliver And Pick-up Of Dumpster. Hauling Of Debris, Rental Of
Dumpster And Disposal Fee.
Quantity
12.00 x
EA
Installation
Unit Price Facl.
330.00 x 1.0375"
Total
4,106.5000
$831.66
01630 4001
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
CY Rubbish HandPng Via Stairs, Per CY Of Ma1erial Per Floor
Quantity Unit Price Fact
Installation 480.00 x 1.67 x 1.0375"
Total
631.6600
$1,245.00
01641 0116
was -01000
WBS-01000
MO Air.compressor, Gas Portable, 175 CFM, 90 HP WIt
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
Installation 2.00 x 600.00 x 1.0375 '"
Tolal
1,245.0000
$1,239.21
01641 2316
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
MO 8' X 28' Office, With Toilet L.ift
Quantity
Installallon 6.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
199.07 x 1.0375"
Total
1,239.2106
01641 2316 2331
WBS .01000
WBS -01000
01641 2316 2332
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
01641 2316 2333
WBS - 01000
WBS .01000
MO For Delivery And Set-Up (Block & Level), Add Per Each $155.62
Quantity Unit Price Fact Tolal
Installation 1.00 x 150.00 x 1.0375 ,. 155.6250
MO For Knock-down & Pick-up, Add Per Each $119.31
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Total
Installation 1.00 x 115.00 x 1.0375 '" 119.3125
MO For Anchoring into Dirt, Add $62.25
Quantity Unit Price Facl. Total
Installation 1.00 x 60.00 x 1.0375 '" 62.2500
$458.76
Fact. Total
1.0375 '" 458.7625
$155.62
Fact. Total
1.0375 ,. 155.6250
01641 2412 MO Storage Container, 8'x8'x20'l.ift
Quantity Unit Price
WBS.Ol000 Installation 6.00 x 73.70 x
WBS - 01000
01641 2412 2415 Me For Drop-off Or Pick-up (Each Way). Add
Quantity Unit Price
WBS _ 01000 Installation 2.00 x 75.00 x
WBS.01000
~
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station No4 relocation
sect. Item Mod. UOM
Description
Line Total
$64.11
Unit Price Fact. Total
10.30 x 1.0375 = 64.1175
$46.99
Unit Price Fact. Total
45.30 x 1.0375 = 46.9988
$179.46
Unit Price Fact Total
28.83 x 1.0375 = 179.4668
$128.17
Unit Price Fact. Total
20.59 x 1.0375 = 128.1728
$205.11
Unit Price Fact Total
32.95 x 1.0375 = 205.1138
Wbs
01641 2422
was - 01000
was - 01000
01641 2431
was - 01000
waS-Ol000
01641 2432
was - 01000
was - 01000
01641 2433
was - 01000
was - 01000
01641 2434
WBS.01OOO
WBS.Olooo
User Note
MO Desk Chair, Rolling Lift
Quantity
InstaRation 6.00 x
EA Phone Hook-Up lift
Quantity
Installation 1.00 x
MO Local Phone Service lift
Quantity
Installation 6.00 x
Me Fax Machine Uft
Quantity
Installation 6.00 x
MO Copier lift
Quantity
Instailallon 6.00 x
MO Steps lift
Unit Price Fact.
37.28 x 1.0375 =
Tolal
232.0680
01641 2435
was -01000
WBS - 01000
$232.06
Installation
Quantity
6.00 x
MO loader-Backhoe, 1-314 CY, 30" aucke~ 18'-0" Depth, 112 HP With Full-time
Operator
$25,527.72
01641 3823
was - 01000
was - 01000
Installation
Quantity
3.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
8,201.68 x 1.0375.
total
25,527.7290
$5,079.00
01641 4066
was - 01000
was - 01000
Me Platform 39" x 120" x 60' Helgh~ 1250# PSI, With Couplln9
Quantity Unit Price Fact
Inslallation 3.00 x 1,631.81 x 1.0375 =
Total
5,079.0086
$9.365.20
01641 5138
was - 01000
was - 01000
WK Tandem Dump Truck, 12 Ton payload With Full-time Truck Driver
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Inslallalion 3.00 x 3.008.90 x 1.0375 =
Total
9,365.2013
DAY Cranes Hydraulic. 70 Ton lift. With FuN-time Operator (Per Person Needed,
Per Day)
$3,307.68
01641 5731
WBS - 01000
was - 01000
Installation
Quantity
3.00 x
Unit Price Fact
1,062.71 x 1.0375 =
Total
3,307.6849
~,
Job Order Proposal 7S.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
Description
sect. Item Mad. UOM
Wbs U.... Note
01641 7402
waS.01000
WBS - 01000
WK 4000 To 5999 La Forklift With Full.time operator (Per Person Needed, Pet
Day)
Installation
Quantity
1.00 x
unit Price Fact.
1,351.15 x 1.0375"
Line Total
$1,401.81
Total
1.401.8181
$2.242,69
01641 7532
waS.02000
WBS - 02000
WK Excavator, 1.112 To 1-318 CY Wi1h Full-time Opera1or (Per Person Needed.
Per Day)
InsIaIlation
Quan~ty
1.00 x
Unit Price Facl
2.242.69 x 1.0000"
Total
2,242.6900
$768.25
01641 8204
waS.01ooo
was - 01000
DAY 3000 PSI Gas pressure Washer Wi1h Full-lime Operator (Per Person Needed ,
Per Day)
Installation
Quantity
1.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
740.49 x 1.0375"
Total
768.2584
$5,678.74
01641 8406
was. 01000
was - 01000
MO eo" Wide. 1/3 CY BobCat. Diesel Wrth Full.time Operator Driver
Quantity Unit Price Facl
Installation 1.00 x 5,473.49 x 1.0375"
Total
5.678.7459
$1.341.20
01641 8409
MO Hydraulic Hammer Attachment Driver
Ouantity Unit Price
Installation 1.00 x 1,292.73 x
Facl.
1.0375 ..
Total
1.341.2074
WBS - 01000
Was.01ooo
$2,316.88
01641 8648
WK 11-12 Ton Smooth Drum. SelfpropelJed. With Full-time Operator
Quantity Unn Price Fact.
Installation 1.00 x 2.233.14 x 1.0375"
Total
2,316.8828
WBS-02ooo
WBS - 02000
$8.816.63
01641 9306
90-105 HP. 04 Or 05 Bulldozer. With Full~me Operator Fee, Delivery On
Truck With Trailer, Set-up & Retum
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
1.00 x 8.497.96 x 1.0375"
MO
Installation
Total
8,816.6335
waS-01000
WBS - 01000
$81.52
01641 9904
EA IloIlClIt Delivery (Or Similar Sized Equipment). Equipment DeIlYS)' Fee.
Delivery On Truck With Trailer. Set-up & Retum
auanllty Unit Price Fael.
InstallatiOll 1.00 x 78.58 x 1.0375"
Total
81.5268
was - 01000
was .01000
$369.63
01641 9905
EA Backhoe. Dozer, Loader Or Excavator (Or Similar Sized EqUipment) Up To
250 HP Equipment Delivery Fee. Delivery On Truck WI1h Trailer, Set-up &
Retum
Installation
Quantity
1.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
356.27 x 1.0375"
Total
369.6301
WBS.01OOO
was - 01000
=
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
sect. 11_ Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
Description
01641 9906
WBS - 01000
WBS - 01000
I\.
Line Total
$554.36
Backhoe, Dozer. Loader Or Excavator (Or Similar Sized Equipment) > 250 HP
Equipment Delivery Fee, Delivery On Truck With Tra1ier, Set-up & Return
Quantity Unit Price FacI.
1.00 x 534.33 x 1.0375 '"
EA
Instalalion
Total
554.3674
$2,430.86
01661 1112
waS.01000
was - 01000
EA Laboratory Compaction Tesl, ASTM 01557 Note: 2 test minimum.
Quantily Unit Price Fact.
Installation 20.00 x 117.15 x 1.0375 '"
Total
2,430.6625
$315.40
01661 1121
waS-Ol000
was - 01000
Proctor Compaction 6" Standard Mold Note: Florida Department of Heallll and
Rehabilitative Services. Chapter 10().6.57. 2 per job minimum.
Quantity Unit Price FacI.
2.00 x 152.00 x 1.0375 '"
EA
Installation
Total
315.4000
$311.25
01661 2111
was - 01000
was - 01000
Compression, 6 X 12 Cylinder ASTM C 39 Note: Price is per mix. nlSt of any
series. Materials furnished by supplier, laboratory sampling included. 1 trial
batch and 6 cyI. tests.
Quantily
20.00 x
EA
Installation
Unit Price FaeL
15.00 x 1.0375 '"
Total
311.2500
$1.452.50
01661 6342
was - 01000
WBS - 01000
HR Pile Driving Inspecllon Nole: 4 hour minimum.
Quantity Unit Price FaeL
Installallon 40.00 x 35.00 x 1.0375 '"
Total
1,452.5000
$99,969.25
Subtotal for 01
Section 02-Slte Work
02011 6001 EA
was - 02000
WBS - 02000
Mlrlimum Set.up Charge For Boring For projec1s where the total boring charge
is less than lIle minimum sel-up charge. Use IIlls item exclusively. This item
should not be used In conjunction with any other items in this secliOn.
Quanllly Unit Price Fact.
2.00 x 650.00 x 1.0375.
Installation
For relocating monitoring wells
$1,348.75
Total
1,348.7500
$1,280.73
02102 1404
WBS - 02000
WBS . 02000
EA Stump Removal, >24" To 36" (>61 an To 91 an) Diameter. Includes Loading
Quantity Unit Price FaeL Total
Installation 9.00 x 137.16 x 1.0375 '" 1,280.7315
54.531.76
02102 1415
WBS - 02000
WBS - 02000
Tree Removal. >36" To 48" (>91 em To 121 an) D.B.H. (Diameler & Breast &
Height). Indudes Cutting Up Tree, Chipping & Loading.
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
9.00 x 485.33 x 1.0375 '"
EA
Installation
Total
4,531.7689
"
~
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station No4 relocation
Description
Una Total
Sect. hem Mod. UOM
Wbs
02111 3204
was - 02000
was .02000
User Note
$27,135.25
CCF
Demo Reinfaced Concrete Bulkfing Wilh BulldozerJExcavator Remove
Building, By Building Volume
Quantity
547.05 x
Installation
Unit Price Facl.
47.81 x 1.0375 =
Total
27,135.2528
Sy
Break-up Bilumlnous Pavement With Loader, 1" To 3" Hammer, 1" To 3"
Quantity Unit PrIce Facl.
720.00 x 2.22 x 1.0375 =
$1.658.34
02112 1111
WBS . 02000
WBS - 02000
Installation
Total
1,658.3400
02112 1211
WBS .02000
WBS - 02000
Sy
Break-up And Demo To 3" ThiCk Concrete Or Bituminous, Without Reinforcing
Note: Work indudes breaking Into manageable size by machine, removal and
lOading onto a truCk or dumpster.
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
315.00 x 5.45 x 1.0375 =
$1,781.12
Installation
Total
1,781.1281
$ 15,303.54
02119 1209
WBS - 02000
WBS . 02000
TON Landfill Dump Fee (All Materials Except Hazardous & Tires)
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
Installation 240.00 x 61.46 x 1.0375 =
Total
15.303.5400
$1,397.46
02210 1005
WBS - 02000
WBS - 02000
SY Rough Grade Small Area With Dozer Concrete Placement
Quanllty Unit Price Fael
Installation 4,345.00 x 0.31 x 1.0375.
Total
1,397.4806
$806.13
02210 3103
WBS - 02000
WBS .02000
SY Subgrade Slruclure Grading Structures & Slabs, With Bobcat Concrete
-Placement
Quantity
2,100.00 x
Total
808.1375
Installation
Unit Price Facl
0.37 x 1.0375 =
SF
Finish Grade Structures & Slabs, By Hand, Hand Clean For Concrete
Placement
Quantity
2,400.00 x
$473.10
02210 3202
WBS - 02000
WBS - 02000
Installation
Unit Price Facl.
0.19 x 1.0375 =
Total
473.1000
$1,622.85
02210 4212
WBS - 02000
WBS . 02000
SY Trim & Shape Area With Bobcat Or Front End Loader
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
Installation 4,345.00 x 0.36 x 1.0375 =
Total
1,822.8575
02213 4037
WBS . 02000
WBS . 02000
TON Umestone, 3/8" To 718" $53,992.22
Quantity Unit Price Fael Total
Installation 5,455.00 x 9.54 x 1.0375 = 53,992.2263
CSF Soil PoIsoning $984.17
Quantity Unit Price Fael Total
Installation 340.00 x 2.79 x 1.0375 .. 984.1725
02244 1001
was .03000
WBS . 03000
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP .004.00 Fire Station No4 relocation
Une Total
Description
SKt. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
02264 2101
wes - 02000
WBS - 02000
$146.08
LF 2' High Silt Fence with Stakes at 4' a.c Witl1 Stakes
----
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 220.00 x 0.64 x 1.0375 =
Total
146.0800
$51,441.84
02311 3003
wes - 02000
wes .02000
VLF Concrete Pile. :>15-20 FT
Quantity
Installation 750.00 x
Unit Prloe Fact.
66.11 x 1.0375 =
Total
51,441.8438
$15,856.32
02530 1101
WBS - 02000
wes - 02000
LF Deliver. Install & Removal Of Well Point System Available)
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installallon 480.00 x 31.84 x 1.0375 =
Total
15,856.3200
$478.08
02530 1205
WBS - 02000
wes - 02000
LFD Wen Point System 401 To 500 FOOl In Length (IF x Days" Quantity.)
Quantl1y Unit Price Fact.
Installation 480.00 x 0.96 x 1.0375 =
Total
478.0800
$17.896.89
02530 1302
WBS - 02000
wes - 02000
WK operation Costs Per Week
Quantity
Installation 3.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
5.685.75 x 1.0375 =
Total
17,898.8969
$726.66
02711 1109
WBS . 02000
wes - 02000
VLF 12" (31 em) Dlameler Hole, Auger ey Machine Fence Post Hole In Soil
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 136.00 x 5.15 x 1.0375 =
Total
726.6650
Fenoe around relocated building
$1.054.01
02711 1318
WBS - 02000
wes - 02000
VlF Concrete Fill. 12" (31 em) Diameter Hole 6'In Length
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Inslallation 136.00 x 7.47 x 1.0375 =
Total
1,054.0170
LF
5' Galvanized Chain Unk Fence, 9 Gauge Coiled Spring Mesh, Top Rail, Une
Post @ 10' a.c.
Quantity
275.00 x
$2,530.72
02711 3102
WBS - 02000
WBS - 02000
Installation
Unit Price Fact.
8.87 x 1.0375"
Total
2,530.7219
LF Board Fence. 3 - 2. x 4. Rails,S' High ,. x 4. Boards, Preservallve Treated
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Tolal
$229.99
02713 2003
WBS - 02000
wes - 02000
Fence Around Relocated Building
Demolition 326.00 x
For demolition of existing wood fence
0.68 x 1.0375 s
229.9930
02n1 1101
WBS . 02000
WBS - 02000
EA 22. x 28. x 28. Benches With Backs Legs
Quantity Unit Price
$15.12
Fact.
Total
Demolition
1.00 x
14.58 x 1.0375"'
15.1268
Subtotal for 02
$202,491.21
~
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
Sect. Item Mod, UOM
Wbs User Note
Description
Section 03-Concrete
03110 1204 SF
WBS - 03000
WBS .03000
Line Total
$4,656.30
Grade Beam Forms, Plywood Forms, Form & Strip With Accessories Fonn &
Strip With Accessories
Quantity
2,400.00 x
Installation
Total
4.656.3000
Unit Price Fact.
1.87 x 1.0375"
$4,656.30
03110 1204
WBS - 03000
WBS - 03000
Grade Beam Forms, Plywood Forms, Form & Strip With Accessories Form &
Strip With Accessories .
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
2,400.00 x 1.87 x 1.0375 =
SF
Installation
Total
4,656.3000
03110 1314
WBS . 03000
WBS - 03000
$887.47
Pile Cap Forms, Square Or Rectangular, Plywood Forms, Form & Strip With
Accessories
Quantity
364.00 x
SF
Installation
Total
887.4n5
Unit Price Fact.
2.35 x 1.0375"'
$246.63
03110 1324
WBS - 03000
WBS - 03000
Pile Cap Forms, Triangular Or Hexagonal, Plywood Forms, Form & Strip With
Accessories
Quantity
84.00 x
SF
Installation
Total
248.6345
Unit Price Fact.
2.83 x 1.0375"
$19,627.98
03210 1006
WBS . 03000
WBS - 03000
TON Grade 60 Res_I, Footings & Slabs, 1117-Up em Long), Deformed
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 18.00 x 1,051.03 x 1.0375.
Total
19,827.9853
$5.651.26
03311 1151
WBS - 03000
WBS - 03000
CY Pour Grade Beam. Regular, Crane & Bucket, 3000 PSI Concrete Foundations
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Total
Installation 65.00 x 63.80 x 1.0375 = 5.651.2625
$508.47
03311 1151 3008 CY For 5000 PSI, Add 200 CY
Quantity
WBS . 03000 Installation 65.00 x
WBS - 03000
Unit Price Fact.
7.54 x 1.0375.
Total
508.4788
Section 07-Thermal and Moisture
07322 1101 SQ Concrete Roof Tile, 13"x16-1/2", 9OISQ. 950 LBlSQ. Earthtone Colors,
Corrugated
Quantity
3.00 x
3.00 x
WBS - 07000
WBS - 07000
Installation
Demolition
For roof tile work
Subtotal for 03
$36,234.43
$1.169.67
Unit Price
288.90 x
86.90 x
Fael.
1.0375 =
1.0375 =
Total
899.2013
270.4763
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
sect. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
Description
01542 1002
was - 07000
was - 07000
sa Vinyl Liquid Roofing, 4 Mils
Quantity
Installation 3.00 x
Une Total
$1,493.78
Unit Price Fact.
479.93 x 1.0375"
Tolal
1,493.7821
For front canopy roofing
$828.17
07590 1142
was - 07000
was - 07000
EA Minimum Charge For Roof Repair
Quantity Unit Price
Installation 8.00 x 99.78 x
Fact.
1.0375 =
Total
828.1740
$791.82
07820 1304
was - 07000
was - 07000
SF
Copper Flashing. 20 Ounce < 500# With Galvanized Steel Anchor Plate
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
120.00 x 6.36 x 1.0375"
Total
791.8200
$990.19
07620 1402
was - 07000
was - 07000
Installation
LF 24" Copper Roof Transition Cover With Galvanized Steet Anchor Plate
Quantity Unit Price Facl.
Installation 80.00 x 11.93 x 1.0375 =
Total
990.1900
$5.113.11
07920 1002
was - 07000
was -07000
ClF Oil Base Caulk & Seal, 114"x3I8" Joint Nole: For unglazed tile or unpolished
slone, matte finish.
Quantity Unit Price
Installation 85.00 x 45.94 x
Demolition 85.00 x 12.04 x
Removal and re-caulking 01 windows & lloorlI
Facl.
1.0375 "
1.0375 "
Total
4,051.3338
1,061.ms
$10,386.75
Subtotal for 07
Section 08.Windows and Doors
08210 1011 EA 3')(7' Pine Exterior Door Frame Custom Made With Threshold & Trim
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
5.DO x 145.22 x 1.0375 =
2.00 x 14.87 x 1.0375 =
was - 08000
was - 08000
08210 1011 2103
was - 08000
was - 08000
08210 1015
was - 08000
was - 08000
08210 1015 2103
was - 08000
was - 08000
Installation
Demolition
EA For Mahogany Add
Quantity
Installation 5.00 x
Unit Price fact.
98.18 x 1.0375 =
$784.18
Total
753.3288
30.8553
$509.30
Total
509.3088
$218.26
Total
199.0029
19.2664
$138.38
Total
136.3896
EA
~x7' Pine Exterior Door Frame Custom Made With ThreshOKl & Trim
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
1.00 x 191.81 x 1.0375 =
1.00 x 18.57 x 1.0375"
Installation
Demolition
EA For Mahogany Add
Quantity
Installation 1.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
131.46 x 1.0375 =
If.
,
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
U,.. Total
Description
Sect. "em Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
08210 3464
was - 08000
was - 08000
$676.36
EA
3'xTx1-314" Solid Core. Walnut Faced Door Add
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
5.00 x 125.20 x 1.0375 '"
2.00 x 12.96 x 1.0375 =
Total
649.4750
26.8920
Inslallatlon
Demolition
$257.55
08210 3464 3486
was - 08000
was. 08000
EA For Solid Wood Staved Core (Glued Block), Add
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
InstaHation 5.00 x 49.65 x 1.0375 =
Total
257.5594
$16.47
08210 3464 3494 EA For 6 Panel Doors, Add
Quantity
was _ 08000 Installation 2.00 x
was - 08000
Unit Price Fact.
7.94 x 1.0375 =
Total
16.4755
08210 3464 3519
$49.44
was - 08000
WBS - 08000
EA For 1 Fool Of Additional Door Height, Add
Quantity Unit Price
Installation 2.00 x 23.83 x
Fact.
1.0315 =
Tolal
49.4473
EA
Pair 3')(7')(1-314" Solid Core. Walnut Faced Door Add
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
1.00 x 248.42 x 1.0375 =
1.00 x 24.93 x 1.0375.
$283.60
08210 3469
was - 08000
was - 08000
Instanation
Demolition
Total
257.7358
25.8649
$103.02
08210 3469 3486
was - 08000
was - 08000
EA For Solid Wood Staved Core (Glued Block), Add
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
installation 1.00 x 99.30 x 1.0375 =
Total
103.0238
$16.48
08210 3469 3494 EA For 6 Panel Doors. Add
Quantity
was. 08000 Installation 1.00 x
was - 08000
Un" Price Fact.
15.89 x 1.0375 '"
Total
16.4859
$49.44
08210 3469 3519 EA For 1 Fool Of Additional Door Height, Add
Quanti~----unit price-Fact.
WBS.08000 Installallon 1.00 x 47.66 x 1.0375 =
WBS - 08000
Tolal
49.4473
08362 2002
EA 16'x7' Sectional Metal o.emead Door. Residential Grade. Indulling Track &
Fillings
$123.00
WBS - 08000
WBS . 08000
Quantity
Unit Price
Fact.
Total
Demolition
2.00 x
59.28 x 1.0375 =
123.0060
5619.18
08362 3001
WBS - 08000
WBS . 08000
SF Remove & Reinstan SecIIonal Metal Overhead Door & Supports
Quantity Unit Prlce Fact.
Installallon 180.00 x 3.73 x 1.0375 =
Total
619.1800
$673.70
08520 1104
WBS . 08000
WBS - 08000
SF' Aluminum Single Hung WindowS. Standard BlUSh Finish. Grade "C"
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
45.00 x 12.87 x 1.0375 =
45.00 x 1.56 x 1.0375.
Total
600.8681
72.8325
Installation
Demolition
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station No4 relocation
Description
Sect. "em Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
08520 1104 1182 SF For Installation In Concrete, Brick Or Block Openings Add
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
WBS . 08000 Instal1atlon 45.00 x 2.07 x 1.0375 =
WBS . 08000
Une T0t81
$96.64
Total
96.6431
08520 1104 1306
$134.46
WBS . 08000
was. 08000
SF For Duranar Finish, Add
Quantity
Installation 45.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
2.88 x 1.0375 =
Total
134.4600
$40.61
08520 1104 1307
was. 08000
was. 08000
SF For Anodized Aluminum Finish, Add
Quantity Unit Price
Installation 45.00 x 0.87 x
Fact.
1.0375 =
Total
40.6181
$435.90
08710 1242
WBS . 08000
WBS . 08000
4-112x4-1/2" Wrought Steel, Standard Duty, Butts Half Surface, BaR Bearing
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Total
10.00 x 40.02 x 1.0375. 415.2075
7.00 x 2.85 x 1.0375 = 20.6981
PR
Installation
Demolitlon
$143.90
08710 1242 1274
WBS - 08000
was. 08000
PR For Stainless Steel, Add 156.18
Quantity Unit Price
Installation 10.00 x 13.87 x
Fact.
1.0375 =
Total
143.9013
$39.21
08710 1242 1275
WBS. 08000
was. 08000
PR For Heavy Duly. Add 156.18
Quantity
Instalation 10.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
3.78 x 1.0375 =
Tolal
39.2175
08710 5103
was.08OOO
was. 08000
08710 5103 5852
WBS - 08000
WBS. 08000
EA
Surface Mounted Heavy Duly Door Closer Ac1Ing
Quantity Unit Price Fael.
4.00 x 245.39 x 1.0375 =
4.00 x 7.51 x 1.0375 =
Installation
Demolition
EA For Stainless Steel. Add 158.18
Quantity Unit Price
InslaRatlon 4.00 x 113.04 x
Fact.
1.0375 =
08710 6417 EA Bored Ently Lockset F82. Removable Core Plated, BHMA E0421
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
WBS . 08000 Installation 6.00 x 266.98 x 1.0375.
WBS . 08000 Demolition 3.00 x 6.48 x 1.0375.
08710 6417 6124 EA For Satin SlainleSS Steel. US 320 (BHMA 630) Add 156.18
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
WBS.08OOO Installation 6.00 x 109.20 x 1.0375 =
WBS - 08000
08710 6802 EA 2.314" aackset, 011 Stained Bronze Finish, Best #67TK1001613
Quantity Unit Price Fact
was.08OOO tnstalation 6.00 x 116.80 x 1.0375 =
WBS . 08000 Demolition 3.00 x 6.60 x 1.0375 =
$1,049.53
Total
1,018.3685
31.1665
$469.11
Total
469.1160
$1.682.11
Total
1,661.9505
20.1690
fK;79.77
Total
679.7700
$760.07
Tolal
739.5300
20.5425
'l.
~
Job Order proposal 75.01.02.CIP .004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
Un. Total
Description
sect. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs User Nol.
08720 3001
waS.08000
was - 08000
$79.96
EA 36" Door Sweep, Aluminum & Neoprene Wealhersbip
Quantity Unit Price Fael
Installation 7.00 x 11.01 x 1.0375 '"
Total
79.9601
EA
U-Stlaped, Slide On, Bottom Mounted Door Shoe WIth DrIp Cap And Sponge
Neoprene Seal For Metal Doors. 1-314" Wide
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
4.00 x 12.02 x 1.0375 =
$49.88
08720 4001
WBS .08000
was - 08000
Installation
Tolal
49.8830
LF
Aluminum Finish TtlreSI101ds. Interior, 3" WidIh, 1/4" Height 114" Height
Quantity Unit Price Fael
7.00 x 9.66 x 1.0375 =
3.00 x 2.07 x 1.0375 '"
$76.59
08730 3121
was - 08000
was -08000
Installation
DemolItion
Total
70.1558
6.4429
Subtotal for 08
$10,254.24
Section 09"Flnishes
09210 2001 SF
was - 08000
was - 08000
Gypsum Plaster Smoolt1 Finish, 3 Coals On Wall
Quantity Unit Price Fael
$899.51
Total
Demolition
850.00 x
1.02 x 1.0375.
899.5125
SF
Stucco, Float finish, 3 Coats, 1" Note: Interior or exteriOr one side. Lath and
fell notlncludecl.
Cluantity
1,460.00 x
960.00 x
$3.986.07
09220 1102
was - 08000
was - 08000
InstaJletion
DemolIllon
Unit Price
2.02 x
0.93 x
Fact.
1.0375 =
1.0375 =
Total
3.059.7950
926.2800
$1.843.22
09220 1103
was - 09000
was - 09000
SF Stucco, Trowel Finish, 3 Coals, 1" Induding Lath and Fell Note: Interior or
ex1etior, one side.
Quantity
Installation 420.00 x
Demolition 420.00 x
For Demolition of Item # 26 and new #26
UnIt Price
3.30 x
0.93 x
.Fael
1.0375 =
1.0375 =
Total
1,437.9750
405.2475
SF
5IS" Fire Ralecl Drywall Installation (1/4" thick fiber.;:ement boafd with tapered
edges over 112" thick type .X. gypsum board)
Quantity Unit Price
620.00 x 0.63 x
620.00 x 0.13 x
$646.57
09250 1202
was - 08000
was - 08000
Installation
Demolition
Fael
1.0375 =
1.0375 =
Total
535.9725
110.5975
SF Z x 2' x 518" Fiberglass Acoustic:al Ceiling Panel (Suspension Syslem Not
Induded)
$24S.17
09511 1101
was. 09000
was - 09000
09511 2101
was - 09000
was - 09000
Quantity Unit Price Fael Total
Demolition 1,840.00 x 0.13 x 1.0375 = 248.1700
SF Z x 2' x 518" Minerai Fiber ACOUstical Ceiling Panels $298.80
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Total
Demollllon l,SOO.OO x 0.16 x 1.0375 '" 298.8000
...
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
Une Total
Description
Sect. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs
09540 1002
was - 09000
was. 09000
User Note
SF T Bar CeUlngs Suspension System 2'x 2', Standard 15/16" To 5' Width).
Standard 15/16' -
Quantity Unit Price Fad. Total
$248.17
Demolition
1.840.00 x
0.13 x 1.0375 =
248.1700
09910 1604
was. 09000
was - 09000
SF Paint Exterior SlUCX:O Surfaces One Coat PrImer, Brush/Roller Work
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 7.300.00 x 0.25 x 1.0375 =
$1,893.43
Total
1,893.4375
$378.68
09910 1604 2493 SF For WOIk AbOVe 20' To 25'. Add (Includes Loss Of ProduelMty And Use Of
Ladder)
WBS . 09000
WBS . 09000
Total
378.6875
Installation
Quantity
7,300.00 x
Unit Price Fael.
0.05 x 1.0375"
09910 1606
WBS - 09000
WBS - 09000
SF Paint Exterior Stucx:o Surfaces, Two Coats Paint, Brush/Roller Work
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
Installation 7,300.00 x 0.54 x 1.0375.
$4,089.82
Total
4,089.8250
$681.63
09910 1606 2493 SF For WOIk AbOVe 20' To 25', Add (Includes Loss Of Productivity And Use Of
Ladder)
WBS . 09000
WBS . 09000
Total
681.6375
Inslallation
Quanllty
7.300.00 x
Unit Price Fact.
0.09 x 1.0375.
Subtotal for 09
$15,214.10
Section 10..speclaltles
10351 4006 EA
was. 10000
WBS - 10000
45' (13.7 m) Tapered Aluminum Flagpole Fully Rigged, Without Canuete Base
Quantity Unit Price Fael. Total
$360.09
Demol/llon 1.00 x
For Demolition of elCiSting flagpole
347.08 x 1.0375"
360.0955
SF
Up To 36' High Bahama Shutter, Up To 36' Wide
Quantity Unit Price Fact.
464.00 x 28.45 x 1.0375"
464.00 x 1.19 x 1.0375"
$14,268.69
10715 3101
WBS -10000
was. 10000
Installation
Demolillon
Total
13,695.8300
572.8660
SUbtotal for 10
$14,628.79
Section 15-Mechanlcal
15681 1002 EA
was - 15000
was . 15000
7.5 Ton Air Cooled Condensing Unit With Compressor. Condenser, Fan &
Molor
$302.32
Quantity
Unit Price
Fact.
Total
Demolillon
1.00 x
291.40 x 1.0375"
302.3215
'\
Job Order Proposal 75.01.02.CIP.004.00 Fire Station N04 relocation
Sect. Item Mod. UOM
Wbs User Note
Description
Line Total
Quantity Unit Price Fael Total
was -15000
was -15000 Demolition 2.00 x 356.51 x 1.0375 = 743.9083
15699 9101 LB Recovery Of Refrigerant $1,093.00
Quantity Unit Price Facl Tolal
was - 15000 Installallon 350.00 x 3.01 x 1.0375 = 1,093.0063
was - 15000
To Recover the Refrigerenl before Demo
Subtotal for 15 $2,139.24
Section 18-Non Prepriced
16002 1002 EA Fire Station # 4 Building Relocation $273,625.00
Quantity Unit Price Fact. Total
was - 02000 Installation 1.00 x 273,625.00 x 1.0000 = 273,625.0000
wes - 02000
EA 10 Ton AJr Cooled Condensing Unit With Compressor, Condenser. Fan &
Motor
$743.90
15661 1003
Subtotal for 18
$273,825.00
Job Order Cost Proposal Total
The_ ",d.- _,...., rwpr...... Ihe_ _ rotlhe~. My d;_CY boIwnnl...Io....,
:IUb-tot8I, Ind the propouIlolll .,. duI to t'CU\ding d the line 10lJl/l.tnd sub-I,*".
$664,943.05
/
\
~.
ATTACHMENT 2
Miami Beach Fire Station #4
C'yof Ml,unl 08(ich
Est maled C(!n~:fucl,on Cost. 7510 JCD
Fire Station #4 Expansion I Restoration: Off-Site: Cost of street improvements to accomodate new station; N_ Construction of
three new back-in apparatus bays and associated administrative and living spaces. Approx 8,000 sf of new construction.
Restoration: prepare new foundation; relocate and stablize old building; remove structural red-tag; no restoration for occupancy
included; NIC: parking at police; prominade at seawall; seawall; sile grading at old rllllstation.
Off-Sit. Work N_ Construcllon $1st Restor J Renovation $1st Total
1 GIn Cond + ac OHP $25,~!!! $320,524 19.72% $39 ~~24,701 24.71% $50 $471,221 21%
2 511. Work $95,225 $205,975 12.&7% $25 $49,620 9.83% $20 ,..-_$350,820 16%
3 CONCRETE $232,900 14.33% $28 $285, 150 58.51% $114 $518,050 23%
4 MASONRY $95,000 5.85% $12 $0 0.00% $0 595,000 4%
5 METAL --_.!~~ 1.&8% $3 ___$5,~5CI 1.1&% $2 533,210 1%
w..._.___._..__._....___._______._.._ -..---.--.--... h_...__..WH_.._.---;_..____
l-!..~~'---- l-..!26,3~.l'. _!:.~~ $3 f--~-~ f-._O'O?.!' $0 ~.!l"~.l'.~_~_~~
- ---,-----
7 ROOFING I SELANTS $47,480 2.92% $6 $20,535 4.07% $8 $68,015 3%
8 DOORS & WINDOWS $138,094 8.56% $17 $0 0.00% SO 5139,094 6%
9 FINISHES $139,208 8.57% $17 516,500 3.27~ $7 $155,708 7%
10 SPECIAL nES $21,765 1.34% $3 $2.240 0.44% $1 524,005 1%
_.11 EQUIPMENT $25,000 1.~~ $3 $0 .!>:2~ $0 ~5,O~ ~
12 FURNISHINGS $0 0.00% $0 ~-----~ 0.00% SO ---~~ 0%
"_,._._.._.__._...,.w......._........_._._.._.__.___._ -~ ._.__._--~"." ..--'--..--' .-..-.---
15 MECHANICAL $0 0%
HVAC $131,358 8.51% $17 $0 0.00% $0 $138,358 6%
PLUMBING $63,100 3.88% $8 $0 0.00% $0 $63,100 3%
FIRE SPRINKLERS $11,750 1.03% $2 $0 0.00% $0 $18,750 1%
11 ELECTRICAL $121,243 7.n% $15 $0 0.00% $0 $128,243 6%
Sub Total Conslructlon Cost $121.221 1,825,056 100% 504,5. 100% 2,250,173
DD .sllmSIe $115,018 $1.5411.427 $504,702 $2.169.144 I
Dlffe..nce $1,201 $75,m (S106) $81,729
5"11 5"11 lI% .."
Budget 1.939.688
OVER BUDGET 311.187
_s previously o".r budget 229,719
clllllll. (Ii ,4811)
t1C HARRy ASS\)( It> Tf :3
J\f "1.1-('5 E'I11....~ f"" PI 1.1,"'<.
JJ';: J ~ll(13
Miami Beach Fire Station #4
City of ~,~,a/Trl 8€a::h
E "lImaled Constn..cll:n Cc~t 7'" CD
The following compares the estimate completed at DO phase to the 75% CD estimate; and INCLUDES both phase 1
(historic building move budgeted at $505,000); and phase 2 (new building and site work),
p,.vloua $Isf Currenl Difference
".,..--..--." _._..._-"'--~..__.._-_.,._-,._.._" - ...--.---- ~._...... 1-- $47i:22iT21%
1 Gen Cond + GC OHP $470,571 22% $57 $643 0%
2 Slle Work $329,551 15% $40 $350,120 16% $21,269 6% inaease fill requirements
3 CONCRETE $515,117 24% $63 $511,050 23% $2,233 0%
4. MASONRY $91,000 5~ $12 $95,000 4% (53,000) -3%
5 METAL $33,850 2% $4 $33,210 1% ($640) -2%
~_~OOD $33,701 2% $4 $26,300 1% (57.401) -22%
1 ROOFING' SELANTS $64,200 3% $8 $61,015 3% $3,815 6%
8 DOORS & WINDOWS $110,680 5% $13 $139,094 6% $28,434 26% +OH doors. storefront
9 FINISHES $1n, 175 1% $19 $155,708 1% $3,533 2%
10 SPECIALTIES $34,560 2% $4 $24,005 1% (510,555) -31%
11 EQUIPMENT $25,101 1% $3 -- $25,000 1% ($101) 0%
12 FURNISHINGS $0 0% $0 $0 0% $0 100%
$0
_~_~EC~ANIC~I:....--.__ I---~- ---
HVAC $9"'00 4% $12 $131,358 6% $41,558 43% ADD p<emuim vah exh
PLUMBING $63,000 3% $8 $83,100 3% $100 0%
FIRE SPRINKLERS __~~~~l!. -~~ $2 ____~~1,7_~ 1% $150 1%
-,--.-----.....--.---...
18 ELECTRICAL $124,551 6% $15 $126.243 6% $1,691 1%
Sub Tolal Conetruclion Coal 2,189,144 100% $265 2,250,873 11.721 4%
Budgel
1,919,&86
over lunda"
prevloualy
change
311,117
229,71'
(81,488)
Projec1la currently OVER budgel
ProjecIls 11% OVER
r1~ HAf-.<I-<Y A~,SLJ( ;~'f-:;
p. ( IlIlf-' _1-" [nq ,. s' PI "lnf-'-
JUl't' '} 20)::>
'l.
'\.
Mleml Beach Fire Station #4
City of Miami Beach
Estimated Construction Cost. 75%CD
Restoration I Renovation
MCHarry Associate.
2780 SW Douglu Road
06103103
Restoration I Renovation
Page 1
MI.",I BelICh Fir. stallon 1M MCHarry Associates
City of Miami BelICh 2780 SW Douglas Road
Estimated Construcllon Cost. 75%CD ll6I03I03
R..tol'lltlon I Renovatlon
Untt Untt Cost Sub- Total
2 SITE WORK
SITE PREP I I $12,610
ClearlGrublGradeITermtte 30000 sf $0.92 $27600
! Embankment (lill) I 1.261 cv $10.00 $12610
Concrete Sidewalks 0 sf $5.00 $0
DEMOLITION T I $0 $10,000
Seleclive Demo (Demo 1965 portion++) T 1 T Is $10,000.00 $10,000
Asbestos removal fundetermined. AsbeslDS survev reauiredl
PAVING .____.___.____.___._ ~6~
-COncrete Curbs ---------- 80 If $12.00 $960
SITE lJT1L1TIES $0 $18,850
Stte Eleclrical Dud Bank 80 If $40.00 $3,200
Site Communications 80 If $25,00 $2,000
Site Water 80 If $75.00 $6,000
Site Sewer 80 If $30 $2,400
Site Drainage Inlels 1 ea $1,500 $1,500
Site DraJnage Exfillfalion 50 If $75 $3,750
LANDSCAPE. HARDSCAPE $0 $7,200
Irrigation systems 5,000 sf $0.75 $3,750
Fences 230 If $15 $3,450
~ CONCRETE/MASONRY $285,150
Foundations (Piles) 75 cv $200 $15,000
__ Minor.~R~..e!'!...-____- .........J_ __Is $12,500 $12,500 --
Crawl space exterior wall (mas+stu, +pal) 600 sf $14 $8,400
RestorelRepairlUP!Ir8de Struc Frame 3,550 sf $35 $124,250
Move Building 1 LS $125,000 $125,000
4 MASONRY $0
5 METAL $5,850
Steel Repair - at front steps 1 Is $5,850 $5,850
-Swooo-------.--- SO
7 MOISTURElTHERMAL PROTECnON $20,535
Windows 54 sf $65 $3,510
ShuUers 540 sf $25 $13,500 -
RoofIng Repair 1 allow $2,500 $2,500
Joint Sealers 2,500 Is $0.20 $500
8 DOORS and WINDOWS SO
9 FINISHES $16,500
Refinish Exterior 5,000 sf $3.00 $15,000
Painting (quantity corrected) 5,000 sf 0.30 1,500
Page 2
'\.
..
Miami Beach Fire Station tI4 MCHarry AHocIatel
City of Miami Beach 2780 SW CoUllIaI Road
Estimated Conltructlon Cost. 75%CD 06103/03
Reltoratlon / R.novatfon
10 SPECIALTIES/BUILT-INS $2,240
Wan Louvers 56 sf $40 $2,240
11 EQUIPMENT $0
12 FURNISHINGS $0
13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $0
14 CONVEYANCE $0
15 MECHANICAL $0
PLUMBING $0
FIRE SPRINKLERS 0 $0
16 ELECTRICAL $0
SUB-TOTAL ALL TRADES $379,895
GENERAL CONDITIONS $124,701
Estimate Contingency 5% $18,995
Difficulty Fac10r 0%
General Conditions 15% S59 833
BOND & FEES 10% S45.8n
GRAND TOTAL $504,596
SSIsf = $201.84
Page 3
Miami Beach Fire Station M I MCHarrY Associates
City of Miami Beach I 2780 SW Doualas Road
Estimated Construction Cost. 75%CD 06103103
Offalte
I
I
Base Calculations 9,235.00
1 GENERAL CONDITIONS Unit Unit Cost Sub-Total --
General Conditions t5% $14,284
GC ohp 10% $9.523
BOND 2% $2,190
$25,996 $25,996
PAVING $75,72
Pavma w. base 13,045 sf $5.00 $65,225
Pavina overlay sf $0.67 $0
Retaining Walls If $350,00 $0
OFFSITE PAVING sf $2.50 $0
Conc Curbs 200 If $15,00 $3,000
reduce unit price per URS 200 If ($5.00) ($1,000)
Curb Cuts 100 sf $25.00 $2,500
Parking lot Markings w. misc
allow 200 ea $30.00 $6,000
Parking Bumpers ea $25 $0
HC Parking w. signs ea $215.00 $0
SITE UTILITIES $12,OOC
Chilled Water Piping - 4" If $45,00 $0
Site Electrical Duel Bank If $40.00 $0
SIte Communications $25.00 $0
Site Lighting Dole $3,200.00 $0
Site Water If $35.00 $0
Site Sewer If $30 $0
Lift Station ea $40,000 $0
Site Drainage Inlets 3 ea $1,500 $4,500
Drainage wells ea $25,000 $0
Backflow preventors ea $2,500 $0
Site Dralnaae Exliltration 100 If $75 $7,500
ax8 tap ea $4,500 $0
Relocation of Fire Hydrant ea $1,000 $0
LANDSCAPE - HAROSCAPE $7,500
Irrigation systems sf $0.75 $0
Sidewalks 1.500 sf $5.00 $7,500
Fences If $15 $0
Exterior Signage Is $10,000 $0
SUB"TOTAL TRADES $95,225
GENERAL CONDITIONS $25,996
GRAND TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION $121,221
#REF!
Page 1 of 1
'i.
...
Miami Beach Fire Station #4 I MCHaITY Associates
City of Miami Beach -\ I 2780 SW Doualas Road
Estimated Construction Cost. 75%CD 06103103
New Construction I
1 GENERAL. CONDITIONS Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sub-Total
General Conditions 15.00% $195,680 $320,524
GC ohp 8.42% $109,842
BOND 1.00% $15,002
: $320,524
2 SITEWORK
SITE PREP $53,O2~
Remove Curbs 300 If $4.00 $1,200.00
Embankment (filiI 4,100 cv $10.00 $41,000.00
I- Re":1ove SidewalkslPaving 1,500 sf $1.00 $1,500.00
Remove Trees 10 ea $200.00 $2,000.00
Termite treat. 8,300 sf $0.40 $3,320.00
Demo Fnds 2,000 sf $2.00 $4,000.00
PAVING $46,745
Asphalt pavement & fill 1,000 sf $3.00 $3,000.00
Cone. Pavement and sidewalks 4,210 sf $3.00 $12,630.00
Retaining Walls 165 If $200.00 $33,000.00
Curb Cuts 3 ea $100.00 $300.00
Parking lot Markings w. mise
allow 1 Is $500.00 $500.00
Parking Bumpers 1 ea $100.00 $100.00
HC Parking w. signs 1 ea $215,00 $215.00
SITE UTILITIES $77,70~
Site Electrical Duct Bank 100 If $40.00 $4,000.00
Site Communications 100 If $25.00 $2,500.00
Site Water 100 If $35.00 $3,500.00
Site Sewer 100 If $30.00 $3,000.00
Site Drainaoe Inlets 1 Is $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Drainage wells 2 ea $25,000.00 $50,000.00
2 Backflow preventor 2 ea $3.600.00 $7,200.00
Site Drainage Exfiltration 0 If $75,00 $0.00
8x8 tap and side walk
restorallon 1 ea $4,500.00 $4,500.00
Dumpster drain connect 1 ea $500.00 $500.00
Relocation of Fire Hydrant 1 ea S1,000.00 $1,000.00
LANDSCAPE $28,510
Irrigation systems 20,600 sf $0,85 $17,510.00
Exterior Signage 1 Is $5,000.00 $5.000.00
Plantina 20 ea $300.00 $6,000.00
Sod 20,600 sf $0.30 $6,180.00
3 CONCRETE $232,900
SLAB-ON-GRADE
Apparetus Bav 98 cv $300.00 $29,400.00
Dorm. Kitchen 41 cv $300.00 $12,300.00
Other AreaS 61 cv $300.00 $18,300.00
Conc pites 125 cv $200.00 $25,000.00
Page 1 of 5
Miami Beach Fire Station #4 MCHarrv Associates
City of Miami Beach 2780 SW Doualas Road
~.imated Construction Cost. .?5DIeCD 06103/03
New Construction
I ,
IGrade Beams 150 cy $300.00 $45,000.00
WALLS I COLUMNS
lArch, PIP wall 34 cy $500.00 $17,000,00
-\eolumns 30 cv $450.00 $13,500.00
ROOF STRUCTURE
Roof and Tie Beams 52 cy $300.00 $15,600.00
App. I Kit Slab 56 cv $275.00 $15,400.00
Office / Dorm Slab 76 cy $300.00 $22,800.00
12" PC Joists 9 ea $400.00 $3,600.00
24" PC Joists 6 ea $2,500.00 $15,000.00
4 MASONRY $95,000
8" masonry 4,500 sf $9.00 $40,500.00
8" mason'Y- 1,900 sf $9.00 $17,100.00
12" Masonry 3,400 sf $11.00 $37,400.00
9,800
5 METAL $27,360
METAL FABRICATIONS
Structural Steel - Rebar 10 ton $2,000.00 $20,000,00
Misc. metal fabrications 1 Is $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Wall Rail 16 If $15.00 $240.00
Dumpster Gates 1.5 pr $600.00 $900.00
Aluminum Stair Nosing 70 LF $10.00 $700.00
Anale Bt OH Door 52 If $10.00 $520.00
Metal Screens 210 sf $16,00 $3,360.00
6 WOOD $26,300
Rough Carper1try 8,300 sf $1.00 $8,300.00
Alarm Room Console 1 ea. $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Alarm Room desk/shelf 10 If. $300.00 $3,000,00
Kitchen Cabinet 16 If $250,00 $4,000.00
Kitchen Service Counter 20 If $300,00 $6,000,00
7 MOISTUREfTHERMAL $47,480
Ext Wall Insulation 2,250 sf $0.40 $900,00
Int Wall Insulation 3,200 sf $0.40 $1,280.00
Roof Insulation - Rigid 8,300 sf $1.50 $12,450.00
Fireproofin!iTsteel) 1 Is $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Louvers 200 sf $18.00 $3,600,00
Roofing - Mod. Bit. 83 sq $250,00 $20,750.00
Flashing & Cap Flashing 250 If $2.00 $500.00
Scuppers - Conc. 12 ea $250.00 $3,000.00
8 DOORS and WINDOWS $139,094
~erior~,H.M. 2 ea $300.00 $600.00
Interior Doors, H.M. 17 ea $200.00 $3,400,00
24x24 AcceSS Door 10 ea $100.00 $1,000.00
Hardware 19 ea $300.00 $5,700.00
Page 2 of 5
\
"
Miami Beach Fire Station #4 I ! MCHarrv Associates
Cltv of Miami Beach 2780 SW Douglas Road
~.stimated Construction Cost. 75%CD i 06103103
New Construction --j'-
,
Skylights 80 sf $70.00 $5,600.00
Roll up Doors 3 ea $6,500.00 $19,500.00
Glazed (sectional) Doors 3 ea $4,000.00 $12,000.00
Interior Storefront 286 sf I $25.00 $7,150.00
Exterior Storefront 1,522 sf $52.00 $79,144.00
Storefront Doors 5 ea $1 ,000.00 $5,000.00
9 FINISHES $139,208
Stucco Exterior 3,950 sf $3.50 $13,825.00
PARTITIONS
Inside exterior(Furred) 3,160 sf $2.00 $6,320,00
Drywall Partition Assembly 6,400 sf $4.00 $25,600.00
Toilet & Laundry - Tile 2,400 sf $5.00 $12,000.00
FLOORS
Office. Hall, Kit - VCT 2,674.00 sf I $2.50 $6,685.00
Wet Areas - Tile 916 sf $8.00 $7,328.00
Dorm - Carpet 1,200 sf $32.00 $38,400.00
Other - Seled Cone. 3,510 sf $1.50 $5,265.00
CEILINGS
IKitchen, Dorm - ACT 2,100 sf $2.50 $5,250.00
Wet Areas - M.R. 800 sf $5.00 $4,000.00
BASE
Ext Walls - Rubber 250 If $1.50 $375.00
. I Interior Walls - Rubber 640 If $1.50 $960.00
PAiNTING
PaintlnQ Interior 15,760 sf $0.50 $7,880.00 ...,..
Painting Doors 19 ea $50.00 $950.00
Paintina Stucco 3,950 sf $0.60 $2,370.00
Paint Mech Equip 2 eaml $1,000.00 $2,000.00
10 SPECIALTIES $14,880
[TOilet Compartments - Plastic 2 ea I $800,00 $1,600.00
Urinal Screens - plastic 1 ea $230.00 $230.00
Signage 25 ea $50,00 $1,250.00
Exterior SianBae - Alum. 1 Is $2,000.00 $2,000.00
Lockers - full ht 18x18x72 30 ea $260.00 $7,800.00
Maltier Board 1 ea $500.00 $500.00
Fire ExtinQuishers & Cab 5 ea $300.00 $1,500.00
TOILET ACCESSORIES $8.885
Toilet Paper 5 ea $35.00 $175.00
Paoer TowellWaste 5 ea $175.00 $875.00
Fem napkin dispenser 1 $570.00 $570.00
Fem naDkin disJl<)sal 3 $170.00 $510.00
Soap Dispenser 9 ea $100.00 $900.00
Mirrors 9 ea $200.00 $1,800.00
Rob Hooks 10 $20.00 $200.00
Shower Rods 7 $65.00 $455.00
Grab Bars 6 ea $100.00 $600.00
Mise Allowance (Benchf 2' units $400,00 $800.00
page3of5
I\.
\,
Miami Beach Fire Station ".- 1 1 MCHamf Associates
City of Miami Beach T 2780 SW Dougtas Road
Estimated Construction Cost. 75%CD -------t 06103/03
New Comrtruction-.-- T --
i
I
11 EQUIPMENT NIC - by OwnBl'
KITCHEN EaUIPMENT $25,000
SS Counter 35 If $60.00 $2,100.00
Garbage disposal 1 I $1,000.00 $1,000.00
ALLOWANCE BALANCE , $21,900.00
Refrigerator 3 NIC I $3.300.00
Freezer 1 NIC i $1,800.00
Range 1 NIC I $5,300.00
Hood System 1 NIC $11,000.00
Garbage compactor 1 NIC $800.00
Laundry washer/dryer 2 NIC $2,000.00
Dishwasher 1 NIC $3,600.00
Ice maker 1 NIC $2,000.00
Special Decon. Rooom 0 NIC $10,000.00
Storage shelving 20 NIC $200.00
12 FURNISHINGS $0
Bunk 12 NIC $150.00
Dssk 12 NIC $250.00
Wardrobe 12 NIC $300,00
Accordian Curtains 11 NIC $75.00
15 MECHANICAL $138.358
HVAC
Apparatus Bay 3150 sf $5.00 $15.750.00
Dorm, Office Areas 3874 sf $15.00 $58.110,00
Othsr areas 1276 sf $15.00 $19,140.00
Vehicie Exhauset SVSi: 1 ea $32,780.00 $32,780.00
T estlBal - 10% of mech 1 Is $12.578.00 $12,578.00
PLUMBING $63,100
Water Closetslshowers 9 fixture $1,900.00 $17,100.00
Lavs / Sinks 9 fixture $1.500.00 $13,500.00
Urinals 2 fixture $1,200.00 $2,400.00
Laundry 1 Is $1.000.00 $1,000.00
Roof Drainaae 10 ea $1,000.00 $10,000,00
Hot Water Htrs 1 ea $600.00 $600.00
Kitchen Sink 2 ea $1,200.00 $2,400,00
Hand Sink 1 ea $1,200,00 $1,200.00
Janitors Sink 1 ea $1,500.00 $1.500.00
Misc. appliance COM. 1 Is $500.00 $500.00
Pipe protection 9 ea i $100.00 $900.00
Gen Fuel Tank -1500aal 1 ea ! $12,000.00 $12.000.00
FIRE SPRINKLERS $16,750
Sprinklers 8.300 sf $1.50 $12,450.00
Obi Detection Check Valve 1 ea $4,000.00 $4,000.00
Connect to source 1 ae $300.00 $300.00
Pegs 4 of 5
\
'\,
Miami Beach Fire Station #4 I MCHarry Associates
City of Miami Beach I 2780 SW Douglas Road
estimated Construction Cost. 7S'kCD 06103103
New Construction
16 ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL - POWER $73,278
Emeraencv Generator 1 ea. $35,000.00 $35,000.00
UG conduit to pad 600 If $25.00 $15,000.00
Liahtnina protection 1,200 sf $5,00 $6,000.00
Apparatus Bay 3,150 sf $1.00 $3,150.00
Other areas 1,276 sf $5.00 $6,380.00
Dorm, office areas 3,874 sf $2.00 $7,748.00
ELECTRICAL - LIGHTING $39.227
Apparatus Bay 3,150 sf $3.50 $11,025.00
Other areas 1,276 sf $3.50 $4,466.00
Dorm, office areas 3,874 sf $4.00 $15,496.00
Landscape & Security 20,600 sf I $0.40 $8,240.00
TELEPHONE I DATAl PA
SYSTEM $13,738
PA system 8,300 sf $1.00 $8,300.00
Apparatus Bay 3,150 sf-conduit $0.50 $1,575.00
Other areas 1,276 sf-conduit $0.75 $957.00
Dorm, office areas 3,874 sf-conduit $0.75 $2,905.50
8,300
SUB-TOTAL. TRADES $1,304,533
GENERAL CONDITIONS $320,52<1
GRAND TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION $1,625,056
$195.79
Page 5 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-25261
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION
TO FULFILL THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS,
INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE HISTORIC
PRESERVATION BOARD PROCEDURES, FOR
THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FIRE
STATION NO.4 STRUCTURE.
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2002, the Fire Station No.4 site was
designated as a historic structure by the Mayor and City Commission; and
WHEREAS, consequently, the proposed improvements to Fire Station
No. 4 were to be conducted in two (2) distinct phases: Phase 1 consisting
generally of the relocation of the existing structure to a southwesterly position
on the site; and Phase 2 consisting of the design and construction of a new
state-of-the-art, three (3) bay apparatus Fire Station; and
WHEREAS, due to site constraints, the new Fire Station would be built in
the same location as the historic structure scheduled to be relocated; and
WHEREAS, as a result, the relocation ofthe existing structure needed to
be completed before construction of the new Fire Station could start; and
WHEREAS, construction documents for Phase 1 are complete, and the
cost for the relocation of the historic structure is estimated at $929,629; this
amount represents approximately $424,573 over the Phase 1 current budget
for construction; and
WHEREAS, construction documents for Phase 2 are approximately 75%
complete, and the probable construction cost estimated for Phase 2 by
MCHarry and Associates, Inc., the City's consultant, is $1,746,277; this amount
represents a current deficit of $311, 187 for Phase 2; and
WHEREAS, the estimated shortfall for both phases combined is at
between $736,187 and $761,187; and
WHEREAS, fixtures, furniture, and equipment (FF&E) for the Project are
projected to cost approximately $200,000, and this item is unfunded; raising the
overall Project shortfall to up to $961,187; and
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2003. the Mayor and City Commission
discussed at length the status of the Project, and subsequently
unanimously passed a motion expressing consensus reached forthe
demolition of the existing Fire Station No, 4 structure.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI
BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission direct the
Administration to fulfill the City's requirements, including compliance
with the Historic Preservation Board procedures. for the demolition of
the existing Fire Station No.4 structure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2003.
~. e.~ ~
r CITY CLERK .
F:\CAPlIIaIlIMAGMICIGOBONDlFIRE SATlON 4 DEMOlITION RESQ.doc
N1'P'RCNEO M10
FORM & LANGUAGE
. FOR EXECUTION
4/~2-~d3
C' Date
2
SEP-02-2003 14:52
l
CITY MIRMI BCH PLRNNING D
3056737559
P.01
q
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
STAFF REPORT
~
- ~
""!
';>
ti=.
U ,.
..
~ E I:: ..
~ 0 11 ~
() ll..
,
cll1Y OF MIAMI BEACH
,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,
I
TO:
FROM: i
,
I
,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
Jorge G- Gomez, Director~
Planning Department v::J
R
-0
['-
DATE:
September 9, 2003 Meeting
RE:
Historic Preservation File No. 1701
6860 Indian Creek Drive - Fire Station No.4
The ap~licant, the City of Miami Beach, is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness to
demolis~ an existing, historic fire station and construct a new fire station.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 1 t~rough 4, Block M, Corrected Plat of Atlantic Heights, According to the Plat Thereof. as
Record~ in Plat Book 9, Page 14, of the PUblic Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida.
i
HISTO~'REQUEST:
On July~, 2002, a Certlflcate of Appropriateness was granted for the relocation and restoration
of the e~isting, historic fire station and the construction of a new one (1) story fire station at the
north enp of the subject site.
I
I
The curtent request is for the complete demolition of the existing, historic fire station and
construdtion of the new fire station as previously proposed. The proposed new 8,500 square
foot, one (1) story fire station will house dormitories and kitchen facilities, a three (3) bay garage
for fire vehicles, and other ancillary spaces- A memorial to the demolished station also is
propose?
,
I
SITE DATA:
Zoning ..;
Future Wand Use Designation -
Lot Sizel-
ExistingiFAR -
Propos~ FAR -
,
Existing jUse/Condition -
Propos~ Use -
GU (Municipal Use)
PF (Public Facility - Fire, Police, Other)
35.313 S.F,
7,723 S.F./ 0.22
13,222 S,F./ 0,37 (Max FAR = 2,0), as represented by the
applicant
32 feet / 2 stories
23.75 feet / 1 story (27 feet to highest non-habitable
projection)
Fire and Police Station
Fire and Police station
Existing lHeight -
Propos~ Height-
I
SEP-02-2003 14:52
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.02
Page 2 of 11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
EXISTllIi STRUCTURES:
There ari.! three (3) eXistln~ structures on the site, The two (2) story fire station on the subject
property,! known as the 69 Street Fire Station or Fire Station No, 4. was constructed in 1937
and designated a Local Historic Site on March 20, 2002,
Design by Robert Law Weed and Edwin T. Reeder, Fire Station No. 4 embodies defining
characteristics of the Neoclassical Revival period of architecture as popularized across America
from about 1900 to the 1950s, The building features a classical two (2) story symmetrically
massed :plan with a side-gabled roof and central chimney, Its principal fa98de is organized
about a: grand two-story curved entrance portico supported by four (4) pairs of full-height
columns! connoting simplified classical columns in the manner of a grand residence. The front
entrance door and the ornamental lantern (now removed) suspended from the oval ceiling
above are customary of the style and give it the feeling of the south wing of the White House.
Designed by Robert and Leonard H. Glasser, an addition to the rear of the original structure
was con~tructed in 1961 to accommodate new fire fighting equipment. The other two buildings
on the S~bject site include a sewage pumping station constructed to the south of the fire station
in 1 937 ~nd a police substation built in 1984 at the southern end of the subject site,
For a "lore detailed description of the properties on the site and their history, refer to the
attached Designation Report.
I
l
COMPL'ANCE WITH ZONING CODE:
The ap ,ication, as proposed, may be inconsistent with the street side setback requirements of
the City Code; consequently, a variance may be required. Also, the proposed demolition of the
existing ~tructure shall require final approval from the City Commission.
,
The abo~e noted comments shall not be considered final zoning review or approval. These and
all zoning matters shall require final review and verification by the Zoning Administrator prior to
the issu*nce of a Building Permit.
,
i
ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE:
Additional information will be required for a complete review for compliance with the Florida
Buildjng~Code 2001 Edition, section 11 (Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction).
All accessibility matters shall require final review and verification by the Building Department
prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
, I
PRELlNilNARY CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION:
In accolilance with Chapter 122 of the Code of the City of Miami Beach. the Transportation and
Concurrency Management Division has conducted a preliminary concurrency evaluation and
determined that the project does not meet the City's concurrency requirements and level-of-
service :standards. However, the City's concurrency requirements can be achieved and
satisfied: through payment of mitigation fees or by entering into an enforceable development
agreement with the City, The Transportation and Concurrency Management Division will make
the determination of the project's fair.share mitigation cost.
,
A final cpncurrency determination shall be conducted prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
Mitigatiq, fees and concurrency administrative costs shall be paid prior to the project receiving
any Buil~ing Permit. Without exception, all concurrency fees shall be paid prior to the issuance
of a Te~porary Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy.
SEP-02-2003 14:52
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.03
~.
Page 3 of 11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
COMPUlM4CE WITH CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA:
A decision on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be based upon the
following:
,
1. ~aluation of the compatibility of the physical alteration or improvement with surrounding
~roperties and where applicable, compliance with the following criteria pursuant to
~ction 116-664(a)(1) of the Miami Beach Code (it is recommended that the listed
qiteria be found Satisfied. Not Satisfied or Not Applicable, as so noted):
,
~
The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for
Rehabilitating Historic Buildings as revised from time to time,
Not Applicable
b. Other guidelines/policies/plans adopted or approved by Resolution or Ordinance
by the City Commission.
Satisfied
II. In determining whether a particular application is compatible with surrounding properties.
t~e Board shall consider the following criteria pursuant to Section 118-564(a)(2) of the
Miami Beach Code (it is recommended that the listed criteria be found Satisfied. Not
~atisfied or Not Applicable, as so noted):
a.
Exterior architectural features.
Satisfied
b.
General design, scale, massing and arrangement.
Satisfied
q.
I
Texture and material and color.
Not Satisfied; see Condition No, 4 and Staff Analysis
Exterior 'surface color samples have not been submitted.
~.
The relationship of a, b, c, above, to other structures and features of the district.
Satisfied
e.
,
The purpose for which the district was created.
Satlsfled
,
,
1.
The relationship of the size, design and siting of any new or reconstructed
structure to the landscape of the district.
Satisfied
i
9.
An historic resources report, containing all available data and historic
documentation regarding the building, site or feature.
Satisfled
ii,
The original architectural design or any subsequent modifications that have
acquired significance.
Satisfied
SEP-02-2003 14:53
CITY MIRMI BCH PLRNNING D
3056737559
P.04
Page 4 of 11
HPB File No, 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
!
j
III. The examination of architectural drawings for consistency with the criteria pursuant to
S,ection 118-564(a)(3) of the Miami Beach Code and stated below, with regard to the
aesthetics, appearances, safety, and function of any new or existing structure, public
i~terior space and physical attributes of the project in relation to the site, adjacent
structures and properties. and surrounding community. The criteria referenced above
are as follows (it is recommended that the listed criteria be found Satisfied, Not Satisfied
or Not Applicable, as so noted):
1
,
~. The location of all existing and proposed buildings, drives, parking spaces,
walkways, means of ingress and egress, drainage facilities, utility services,
landscaping structures, signs, and lighting and screening devices.
Not Satisfied; See Staff Analysis and Condition No.2.
The street end of 691h Street consists of open, barren asphalt which has an
extremely negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
~. The dimensions of all buildings, structures, setbacks, parking spaces, floor area
ratio. height, lot coverage and any other information that may be reasonably
necessary to determine compliance with the requirements of the underlying
zoning district, and any applicable overlays. for a particular application or project.
Not Satisfied; See Zoning Analysis
~. The color, design, surface finishes and selection of landscape materials and
architectural elements of the exterior of all buildings and structures and primary
public interior areas for developments requiring a building permit in areas of the
city identified in section 118-503.
Not Satisfied: See Staff Analysis and Condition No.2.
The street end of 69th Street consists of open, barren asphalt which has an
extremely negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
q. The prop'osed structure, and/or additions to an existing structure is appropriate to
and compatible with the environment and adjacent structures, and enhances the
appearance of the surrounding properties, or the purposes for which the district
was created.
Satisfied
e, The design and layout of the proposed site plan, as well as all new and existing
buildings and public interior spaces shall be reviewed so as to provide an
efficient arrangement of land uses. Particular attention shall be given to safety,
crime prevention and fire protection, relationship to the surrounding
neighborhood, impact on preserving historic character of the neighborhood and
district, contiguous and adjacent buildings and lands, pedestrian sight lines and
view corridors.
Not Satisfied; See Staff Analysis and Condition No.2.
The street end of 69th Street consists of open, barren asphalt which has an
extremely negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
t Pedestrian and vehicular traffic movement within and adjacent to the site shall be
reviewed to ensure that clearly defined, segregated pedestrian access to the site
and all buildings is provided for and that any driveways and parking spaces are
usable, safely and conveniently arranged and have a minimal impact on
SEP-02-2003 14:53
9f
,
,
11.
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.05
~,
Page5of11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
pedestrian circulation throughout the site. Access to the site from adjacent roads
shall be designed so as to interfere as little as possible with vehicular traffic flow
on these roads and pedestrian movement onto and within the site, as well as
permit both pedestrians and vehicles a safe ingress and egress to the site.
Satisfied
Lighting shall be reviewed to ensure safe movement of persons and vehicles and
reflection on public property for security purposes and to minimize glare and
reflection on adjacent properties and consistent with a City master plan, where
applicable.
satisfied
I.j
Landscape and paving materials shall be reviewed to ensure an adequate
relationship with and enhancement of the overall site plan design.
Not SatiSfIed; See Staff Analysis and condition No.2.
The street end of 69th street consists of open, barren asphalt which has an
extremely negative Impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
Buffering materials shall be reviewed to ensure that headlights of vehicles, noise,
and light from Structures are adequately shielded from public view, adjacent
properties and pedestrian areas.
Satisfied
j ~,
Any proposed new structure shall have an orientation and massing which is
sensitive to and compatible with the building site and surrounding area and which
creates or maintains important view corridor(s).
Satisfied
~.
All buildings shall have, to the greatest extent possible, space in that part of the
ground floor fronting a sidewalk, street or streets which is to be occupied for
residential or commercial uses; likewise, the upper floors of the pedestal portion
of the proposed building fronting a sidewalk street, or streets shall have
residential or commercial spaces, or shall have the appearance of being a
residenti,1 or commercial space or shall have an architectural treatment which
shall buffer the appearance of a parking structure from the surrounding area and
is integrated with the overall appearance of the project.
Satisfied '
II
All buildings shall have an appropriate and fUlly integrated rooftop architectural
treatment which substantially screens all mechanical equipment, stairs and
elevator toWers.
Satisfied
!p.
Any addition on a building site shall be designed. sited and massed in a manner
which is sensitive to and compatible with the existing improvement(s).
Satisfied
n.
All portions of a project fronting a street or sidewalk shall incorporate an amount
of transparency at the first level necessary to achieve pedestrian compatibility.
Satlsfled
SEP-02-2003 14:53
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.06
Page60f11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
0;
The location, design, screening and buffering of all required service bays,
delivery bays, trash and refuse receptacles, as well as trash rooms shall be
arranged so as to have a minimal impact on adjacent properties.
Satisfied
i
,
CERTIFICATE OF APP PRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION EVALUATION RITE RIA:
Section 18-564 (f)(4) of the Land Development Regulations of the Miami Beach Code provides
criteria ~y which the Historic Preservation Board evaluates requests for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Demolition. The following is an analysis of the request based upon these
criteria: i
,
i
1. Tjhe Building, Structure, Improvement, or Site is designated on either a national or state
level as a part of an Historic Preservation District or as a Historic Architectural Landmark
dr Site, or is designated pursuant to Division 4, Article X, Chapter 118 of the Miami
~each Code as a Historic Building, Historic Structure or Historic Site, Historic
Improvement, Historic Landscape Feature, historic interior or the Structure is of such
historic/architectural interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state or
local criteria for such designation.
Satisfied
1!he eXisting structure is designated pursuant to Division 4, Article X, Chapter 118
df the Miami Beach Code as a Historic Site.
2. lihe Building, structure, Improvement, or Site is of such design, craftsmanship, or
material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty and/or expense.
Satisfied
lrhe existing structure would be difficult and inordinately expensive to reproduce.
,
3. 1he Building, Structure, Improvement, or Site is one of the last remaining examples of its
~ind in the neighborhood, the country, or the region, or is a distinctive example of an
~rchitectural or design style which contributes to the character of the district.
~atisfied
"{he subject structure Is one of the last remaining examples of Its kind and Is a
distinctive example of an architectural or design style.
;
4. The building, structure, improvement, or site is a contributing building, structure,
itnprovement, site or landscape feature rather than a noncontributing building, structure,
ifnprovement, site or landscape feature in a historic district as defined in section 114-1,
or is an architecturally significant feature of a public area of the interior of a historic or
qontributing building.
atisfied
e existing structure Is designated pursuant to Division 4, Article X. Chapter 118
ofthe Miami Beach Code as a Historic Site.
i
5. ~etention of the Building, Structure, Improvement, Landscape Feature or Site promotes
the general welfare of the City by providing an opportunity for study of local history.
architecture, and design or by developing an understanding of the importance and value
Of a particular culture and heritage.
atisfied
he retention of the subject structure is critical to developing an understanding of
~n important Miami Beach architectural style.
CITY MI~MI BCH PL~NN[NG D
3056737559
P.07
SEP-02-2003 14:53
6.
~.
Page 7 of 11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
7.
.
,
IfJthe proposed d~molition is for the purpose of constructing a parking garage, the Board
s"all consider it if the parking garage is designed in a manner that is consistent with the
$cretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating
Historic Buildings. U.S. Department of the Interior (1983), as amended, and/or the
d~sign review guid,elines for that particular district.
Not Satisfied
ihe demolition proposed In the subject application Is not for the purpose of
cfnstruct,ng a parking garage.
"fihere are definite plans for reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried
QUt, the effect of those plans on the character of the Historic District, whether there is a
cbmpelling public interest requiring the proposed demolition, and whether the Applicant
is willing to bondthe completion of the proposed new construction,
Satisfied
llhe applicant Is proposing to use the property for the construction of a new fire
station.
!
8,
lthe Dade County Unsafe Structures Board has ordered the demolition of a Structure
without option.
!jot Satisfied
lhe Dade County Unsafe Structures Board has not ordered the demolition of any
part of the subj~ct building.
~
9.
1j'he Board determines that retention of the Building/Structure would deny the owner
~conomically viable use of the property.
.!tot Satisfied
l'he applicant has not submitted a financial feasibility study to determine whether
~9 new project as proposed will make the subject property financially viable.
,
STAFF ANALYSIS;
Staff re~nizes that the Ci~ COmmission has made a policy decision to move forward with the
demolition of the historic 69 Street Fire Station (Fire Station No, 4) due to the financial costs of
relocati~g, structurally restoring. renovating, and adaptively reusing the building; the City
Commi~ion is required by Code to make the final decision on the demolition of any City-owned
propertY.. Notwithstanding these relevant policy issues, staff is not supportive of the proposed
demolition of the existing, historic fire station as it is a significant historic site in the North Beach
area, as evidenced by its designation on March 20, 2002, Further, the proposed demDlition
does n~ meet the Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition Evaluation Criteria established
in the CItY Code,
,
,
<
In the eWent the demolition of the fire station is approved by the City Commission, staff would
make ttie following recommendations with respect to the proposed project. Staff does not feel
that the; currently proposed location for a monument to the historic fire station is appropriate.
This vajuable piece of park-like waterfront property may be needed in the future for the
sailing~yaking center that is proposed in the North Beach Strategic Plan, or for some other
approp~ate waterfront-dependent community use. Staff would recommend that an
appropriately designed historic monument be placed in a prominent location on the east side of
the site '(east of the existing pumping station) as close as possible to the footprint of the original
fire staqon. This could be accomplished by creating a suitably landscaped park-like setting
slightly to the south side of the historic fire station's front lawn area, where it WOUld also help to
block vi~ws to the propOsed expansion of the existing sanitary pumping station.
SEP-02-2003 14:53
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.08
~,
Page 8 of 11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
,
,
With respect to the remainder of the proposed site and landscape plan. staff has a serious
concern ;with the large, barren expanse of blank asphalt proposed for the street end on 69th
Street. jrhis area should be improved with a substantially enhanced paving and landscape
design. ! If the project budget is an issue, at a minimum, a concept plan that could be
implemented with another funding source should be provided, And as previously recommended
when the project was reviewed in 2002, staff suggests that the sidewalk on the north side of the
69\11 Strert right-of-way be expanded to the greatest extent possible.
The des\gn proposed for the new fire station is generally very similar to the design approved in
2002; its! plan has been somewhat reconfigured in the south and west areas. Staff's primary
concern! with the originally proposed design was the wing wall which extended from the
southea~t corner of the proposed bUilding that encroached on the view to the relocated, historic
station. ifhis should no longer be an issue,
Staff do~s have some design concerns, however, with the revised west elevation of the new fire
station, i This elevation, which directly fronts onto Indian Creek, is much less aesthetically
pleasing; than the previously approved design. and lacks any design detail. Staff strongly
recommends that it incorporate the successful use of glass fenestration at its south end (along
the "day, room") as did the previously approved version; the plan and use remains essentially
the same. Also, staff believes that the low architectural Mbreeze block" wall of the previously
approved west elevation design should also be reintroduced; it assists in lending some modest
design .style" to the otherwise very utilitarian-looking waterfront elevation of the building.
I
I
RECoMMENDATION:
In view of the foregoing analysis, staff recommends the remainder of application be approved.
subject tp the following conditions:
,
,
1, Revised elevation, site plan, and detailed drawings shall be submitted to and approved
t:iy staff; at a minimum. such drawings shall incorporate the following:
a. Glass fenestration shall be incorporated at the south end of the west elevation of
the new fire station along the Mday room" in a manner to be approved by staff.
b. An architectural concrete "breeze block" wall shall be incorporated on the west
elevation of the new fire station in a manner to be approved by staff.
\ c. The monument to the demolished historic fire station shall be relocated to a
prominent public location on the east side of the subject property (east of the
existing pumping station) slightly to the south side of the historic fire station's
original front lawnlvehicle equipment bay driveway area.
d. The design. materials, and detailing of the historic monument shall be of museum
quality; the monument shall include an historic analysis of the original 69th Street
Fire Station (Fire Station No, 4). inclusive of (a) high quality historic photographic
image(s) of the historic structure and site, and a written description of the history
and evolution of the original building and site.
SEP-02-2003 14:53
CITY MI~MI BCH PL~NNING D
3056737559
P.09
I\.
Page 9 of 11
HPB File No. 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
2. The design and siting of the historic monument shall be brought back before the Historic
R-eservation Board for final approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the
n~w structure,
3. A revised landscape plan, prepared by a Professional Landscape Architect, registered in
t~e State of Florida, and corresponding site plan, shall be submitted to and approved by
s~aff, The species type, quantity, dimensions, spacing, location and overall height of all
plant material shall be clearly delineated and subject to the review and approval of staff.
Pit a minimum, such plan shall incorporate the following:
a. All exterior walkways and driveways shall consist of decorative pavers, set in
sand or other equally semi-pervious material, subject to the review and
approval of staff.
b. All landscape areas abutting driveways and parking areas shall be defined by
decorative bollards,
c, A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain
sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain, Right-
of-way areas shall also be incorporated as part of the irrigation system,
d. The landscape plan shall satisfy all requirements as specified in Chapter 33
of the Miami-Dade County COde. A landscape table shall be provided on
final landscape plans addressing all minimum quantity and native
requirements, subject to the review and approval of staff,
e. The location of backflow preventor, siamese pipes or FPL boxes, if any, and
how they are screened with landscape material from the right-of-way, shall be
indicated on the plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of
staff,
f. The plan for the 69th Street end shall be substantially revised to include
additional landscape plantings. pavers and wider sidewalks, in a manner to
be reviewed and approved by staff.
2. : All building signage shall be consistent in type, composed of flush mounted, non-
Jplastic. non-illuminated, individual letters and shall require a separate permit.
,
3. ! The final exterior surface color scheme, including color samples, shall be subject to the
: review and approval of staff and shall require a separate permit.
,
4, :A traffic mitigation plan. which addresses all roadway Level of Service (LOS)
; deficiencies relative to the concurrency requirements of the City Code. if required, shall
: be submitted prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the final building plans shall
, meet all other requirements of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code.
!
5. : Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new
iwindows, doors and glass shall be required, Drior to the issuance of a building permit.
SEP-02-2003 14:54
Cr.
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.10
Page 10 of 11
HPB File No, 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
,
6, ; All roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices shall be clearly
~ noted on a revised roof plan and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be
: approved by staff,
,
7. ;AII new and altered elements, spaces and areas shall meet the requirements of the
: Florida Accessibility Code (FAC),
,
I
,
8. iThe project shall comply with any landscaping or other sidewalk/street improvement
:standards as may be prescribed by a relevant Urban Design Master Plan approved
: prior to the COMpletion of the project and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
9. jThe applicant may be required to submit a separate analysis for water and sewer
: requirements, at the discretion of the Public Works Director, or designee. Based on a
: preliminary review of the proposed project, the following may be required by the Public
:Works Department:
a. Remove/replace sidewalks, curbs and gutters on all street frontages. if
applicable.
b. Mill/resurface asphalt in rear alley along property, if applicable.
c. Provide underground utility service connections and on-site transformer
location, if necessary.
d. Provide back-flow prevention devices on all water services.
e. Provide on-site, self-contained storm water drainage for the proposed
development.
f. Meet water/sewer concurrency requirements including a hydraulic water
model. analysis and gravity sewer system capacity analysis as determined by
the Department and the required upgrades to water and sewer mains
servicing this project.
g. Payment of City utility impact fees for water meters/services.
h. Provide flood barrier ramps to underground parking or minimum slab
elevation to be at highest adjacent crown road elevation plus S".
I. Right40f-way permit must be obtained from Public Works,
j. All right-of-way encroachments must be removed,
k. All planting/landscaping in the public right-of-way must be approved by the
Public Works and Parks Departments.
,
10, \A drawn plan and written procedure for the proposed demolition shall be prepared and
isubmitled by a Professional Structural Engineer, registered in the State of Florida,
;which fully ensures the protection of the public safety, as well as the protection of the
iexisting structure on the subject site and all existing structures adjacent to the subject
:site during the course of demolition,
SEP-02-2003 14:54
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
3056737559
P.ll
Page 11 of 11
HPB File No, 1701
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
11, ,The certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition shall only remain in effect for the
1 period of time that there is an active Certificate of Appropriateness for the associated
. new construction on the subject property.
12, : The Final Order is not severable, and if any provision or condition hereof is held void
: or unconstitutional in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, the order
! shall be returned to the Board for reconsideration as to whether the order meets the
; criteria for approval absent the stricken provision or condition, and/or it is appropriate
~ to modify the remaining conditions or impose new conditions,
I
i
JGG:TRM:doo
F:\PI..AN\$HPS\03HPB\SepHPBD3\1701.sep.doc
SEP-02-2003 14:54
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING b
1\
3056737559
P.12
I
,
CI1Y O'F ~MIAMI BEACH
PL~NNING D.EPARTMENT
m
-
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
AGENDA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,2003
9:00 A.M.
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
I, ATTENDANCE
1
II. $TATUS REPORTS
III. flEQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES
I
,
IV. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME
I
~.
HPB File No. 1294, Various locations in the public right-ot-way, city-wide. The
applicant, Clear Channel Adshel,lnc, is requesting a one (1) year Extension ofTime
to obtain a Building Permit for a previously issued Certificate of Appropriateness for
the installation of new bus shelters and other miscellaneous street fixtures and
furniture In various locations throughout the city.
HPB File No. 1307, 927-929 Meridian Avenue. The applicant, Ira D. Giller, is
requesting a one (1) year Extension of Time to obtain a Building Permit for a
previously issued Certificate of Appropriateness in order to construct a three (3) story
addition to an existing two (2) story apartment building.
~.
"
V. flEQUESTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
~ . PreviouslY Continued Projects
a. HPB File No, 1500,7300 Ooean Terrace - Olsen Hotel. The applicant, Olsen
Hotel Condominium Association, Inc" is requesting a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the exterior renovation of an existing three (3) story
condomlnh.lm building, inclusive of the replacement of existing wall-mounted
air conditioning units with new wall-mounted units.
SEP-02-2003 14:54
Page 2 of 3
Historic Preservation Board Agenda
Meeting .oate: September 9, 2003
b. HPB File No. 1552,4360 Collins Avenue, The applicant, 4360 Collins, LLC,
is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new eight (8)
story residential building on a vacant lot,
CITY MIRMI BCH PLRNNING D
3056737559
P.13
~. New Projects
a, HPB File No. 1698, 1 n6 Michigan Avenue. The applicant, Alan C. Freeman
and Paul H. Freeman, Trust, is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness to
construct an addition to an existing single-family home,
b. HPB File No. 1699, 532 Michigan Avenue. The Aimee. The applicant,
Miami Beach community Development Corp" is requesting a Certificate of
Appropriateness to partiallY demolish, alter and modify an existing two (2)
story apartment building by enclosing a ponlon at the rear of the structure,
restoring the front elevation and altering the window configuration on the side
and rear elevations.
c. HPB File No. 1700, 1100 14th Street. Olhaber Residence, The applicant,
Elmer Olhaber, is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness to partially
demolish, alter and modify an existing single-family home by replacing two
(2) windows with French doors and constructing a new concrete landing and
a site wall around a portion of the yard.
d. HPB File No. 1701, 6860 Indian Creek Drive. Fire Station No, 4. The
applicant. the CIty of Miami Beach, is requesting a Certificate of
Appropriaten~ss to demolish an existing, historic fire.station and construct a
new fire station.
VI. Ii4EOUESTS FOR PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS
l
VII, ~EW BUSINESS
1. HPB File No. 1697, Discussion Item. Emergency Demolition Order for 245
Washington Avenue,
*. DiscussIon: Potential designation of 4812 Pine Tree Dive.
VI\I, NEXT MEETING DATE REMINDER:
Tuesday, October 7, 2003
,
IX, ADJOURNMENT
All persons are invited to attend this meeting or be represented by an agent, or to express their views in writing
addressed to the Design Review Board c/o the Planning Department, 1700 Convention Center Drive, 2nd
Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. The applications for the above projects are available for public inspection
during nOrmal business hours at the Planning Department. 1700 Convention Center Drive, 2nd Floor, Miami
Beach, ~orida 33139. Inquiries may be directed to the Department at (305) 673-7550,
SEP-02-2003 14:54
CITY MIAMI BCH PLANNING D
~,
3056737559 P.14
Page 3 of 3
Historic Preservation Board Agenda
Meeting Date: September 9, 2003
i
Any of 1h, above items may be continued and. under such circumstances, additional legal notice would not be
providedj Any person may contact the Department at (305) 673-7550 for information as to the status of these
items as Ie, result of the Board's meeting.
l
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Fla. Stat., the City hereby advises the public that If a person decides to appeal
any deciSion made by this Board with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, such person
will needlto ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent by the City for
the introduction or admission of otherwise inadmi5sible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges
or appeals not otherwise allowed by law.
1
In accordance with the AlT1er.icans with Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing special accommodation to
participate in this proceeding should contact the Boards' Administrator at (305) 673-7550 for assistance, no
later tha(l four (4) days prior to the proceeding. If hearing impaired, telephone 1he Florida Relay SelVice
number&, (800) 955"8771 (TDD) or (800) 955.8770 (Voice), for assistance.
Persons! requiring sign language interpreters should contact the Board's Administrator five (5) days in
advance, when possible. For information on access for persons with disabilities, or to request material in
accessible format, please call (305) 673-7550 (VOICE); hearing impaired persons, please call (305) 673-7219
(TOO). (
F:\PLAN"HPB\03HPB\S9PHPB03\hPbagenda03,59p,dOC
\
TOTAL P.14
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
~
Condensed Title:
A resolution setting a Public Hearing to consider granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition of
the Historic Fire Station #4 in order to construct a new fire station on the same site.
Issue:
Should a Public Hearing be scheduled to consider granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
to authorize the demolition of the Historic Fire Station #4?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
The City Commission directed the City Administration to follow the appropriate procedures and processes
to demolish the historic Fire Station #4 building located at 6860 Indian Creek Drive. This direction was
provided at the Commission meeting of July 2, 2003. The Project Architect, MC Harry & Associates,
presented the proposed site plan for the new station at the Historic Preservation Board meeting of
September 9,2003. The HPB voted to recommend to the City Commission that the historic building be
demolished. The HPB further adopted the recommendations contained in the HPB Staff report as they
relate to the new building, not all of which are presently funded. However, atthis point, it is necessary for a
Public Hearing to be scheduled to consider the granting of a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
for the project to proceed. It should be noted that the scheduling of a public hearing is not specifically
required by City Code, but is a prudent measure and does not impact the construction schedule.
Adviso Board Recommendation:
The Historic Preservation Board recommended approval at its meeting of September 9, 2003.
Financial Information:
Source of
Funds:
Approved
D
Finance Dept.
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin
Tim Hemstreet, CIP Office
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
ft7:I
q -/0- O:!J
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.ci.miami-beach.f1.us
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
From:
Date: September 10, 2003
To:
Subject:
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTIN A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT
TO MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 118-563 TO GRANT A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION OF FIRE
STATION #4, A DESIGNATED HISTORIC SITE LOCATED AT 6860 INDIAN
CREEK DRIVE, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 3 BAY FIRE
STATION LOCATED ON THE SAME SITE.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
ANALYSIS
On July 2, 2003, the City Commission directed the City Administration to pursue the
demolition of the existing historic Fire Station #4 based on the fact that the cost for the
relocation of the building was significantly higher than initially estimated. A second item
that was included in this status report was that the Fire Department had requested some
minor changes to the new facility in order to serve their needs better. This has resulted in
an increase to the footprint of the proposed structure. A copy of the July 2, 2003 Status
Report on Fire Station #4 is attached for reference.
Based on the information presented, and as noted above, the Capital Improvement
Projects Office authorized the Project Architect, MC Harry & Associates, to prepare the
necessary documents for submittal to the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) in order to
proceed with the demolition of the historic building. This item was presented to the HPB
at its September 9, 2003 meeting for consideration. The HPB approved a motion to
recommend to the City Commission that the historic building be demolished. The vote on
the motion was 4 members recommending demolition and 3 members against.
As also noted above, a related issue considered by the HPB regards the change to the
proposed new building footprint of an approximate 700 square feet. The HPB also
approved a motion authorizing this revision to the previously approved new building,
provided that the final design addresses the recommended requirements ofthe Planning
Department in the Historic Preservation Board Staff Report (also attached) as well as
certain landscaping requirements. The landscaping requirements generally include
adding canopy shade trees the length of the project site along the Indian Creek
Commission Memorandum
Fire Station #4 Public Hearing
September 10, 2003
Page 2 of 2
Waterway as well as along the sidewalk along Indian Creek Drive. The HPB also
directed that a five foot swale/planting strip be added between the curb and the sidewalk
along Indian Creek Drive.
The staff recommended items approved by the HPB, in part, include:
1 . Glass fenestration shall be incorporated at the south end of the west elevation of
the new fire station along the "day room" in a manner to be approved by staff.
2. An architectural concrete "breeze block" wall shall be incorporated on the west
elevation of the new fire station in a manner approved by staff.
3. The monument to the demolished historic fire station shall be relocated to a
prominent public location on the east side of the subject property (east of the
existing pumping station) slightly to the south side of the historic fire station's
original front lawn/vehicle equipment bay driveway area.
4. The design, materials, and detailing of the historic monument shall be of museum
quality; the monument shall include an historic analysis of the original 69th Street
Fire Station (Fire Station #4), inclusive of (a) high quality historic photographic
image(s) of the historic structure and site, and a written description of the history
and evolution of the original building and site.
5. A significantly revised landscape plan that increases the amount and level of
landscaping to the site, including requirements that exterior walkways and
driveways be constructed of decorative pavers, a requirement that landscape
areas abutting driveways and parking areas be defined by decorative bollards, and
a requirement to landscape the 69t1i Street streetend.
It should be noted that the five items noted above were not contemplated or
consequently budgeted in the current design, so their inclusion, while relatively minor, will
have an impact on the final project budget.
At this time, in order for the project to proceed as previously directed, it is necessary
for the City Commission to schedule a Public Hearing to consider the need to grant a
Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition. If approved, the current schedule
provides for the project to be bid in December/January with a proposed construction
commencement in March 2004.
It should be noted that the City Code does not require the City Commission to
schedule a public hearing in considering the issuance of a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Demolition, however, this is the same process followed by the
Historic Preservation Board. In order to protect the City from potential challenge, it is
recommended that the Commission follow the same process. Following this process
does not affect the construction schedule for the new fire station.