Loading...
Resolution 2022-32056 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-32056 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT ("ADCD") VISION PLAN, IN CONCEPT, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO TAKE THE NEXT STEPS IN IMPLEMENTING ASPECTS OF THE ADCD VISION PLAN AS PART OF THE PROGRAMMING FOR THE VOTER-APPROVED G.O. BOND PROJECT #31 FOR OCEAN DRIVE, AND PREPARE A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ("RFQ") FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE OCEAN DRIVE G.O. BOND PROJECT, WITH THE INCLUSION OF LUMMUS PARK, IF FUNDING IS IDENTIFIED AND AVAILABLE, WITH THE RFQ TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2019, the City issued Request for Qualifications No. 2019- 234-ND for a land use, mobility, and economic development study of the City's Mixed- Use Entertainment ("MXE") district (the "RFQ"), also known as the Art Deco Cultural District ("ADCD"); and WHEREAS, the RFQ sought qualifications from multidisciplinary teams to perform a study covering properties and areas adjacent to commercial corridors including Washington Avenue, Collins Avenue, and Ocean Drive (the "ADCD Vision Plan" or "Project"); and WHEREAS, the RFQ indicated that any recommendations resulting from the Project, as adopted by the City Commission, would form the basis for more extensive projects, specifically the voter-approved Ocean Drive and Washington Avenue General Obligation Bond ("G.O. Bond") projects; and WHEREAS, on July 31, 2019, per Resolution No. 2019-30914, the City Commission authorized negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., d/b/a Zyscovich Architects ("Zyscovich"), as the top-ranked bidder, and authorized execution of an agreement if negotiations were successful; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2020. via Resolution No. 2020-31388, the City Commission reaffirmed the award of the RFQ contract to Zyscovich and the Memorandum accompanying the Resolution attached a July 9, 2020 correspondence from the South Beach Alliance, a stakeholder coalition comprised of the Ocean Drive Association, Washington Avenue Business Improvement District, Lincoln Road Business Improvement District, Collins Improvement Association, and the Espanola Way Association, urging the Mayor and City Commission to execute an agreement with Zyscovich pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, on October 11 , 2020, the City and Zyscovich entered into a professional services agreement as authorized by Resolution No. 2020-31388; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2020, pursuant to Section 2-27(b)(2) of the City Code, Mayor Gelber created the Mayor's Art Deco Cultural District Panel (the "Panel"), to provide recommendations regarding the ADCD and serve in an advisory capacity to Zyscovich; and WHEREAS, since January 8, 2021 , the Panel of resident and business community stakeholders met twenty-two (22) times, at publicly noticed meetings, which were attended by the City Administration and members of the public, where the Panel received presentations from subject matter experts including the consultant team led by Zyscovich, with sub-consultants Town Square Corp., Kittelson & Associates, Lambert Advisory, Gehl, and Raymond Jungles Landscaping, in addition to multiple City Departments and guest speakers; and WHEREAS, initial meetings of the Panel included presentations and discussions regarding Ocean Drive traffic configuration options and side street challenges, enhancement of public safety measures, proposed amendments to the Land Development Regulations, and Zyscovich's proposal for expansion of Lummus Park; and WHEREAS, Zyscovich and the consultant team delivered to the Panel several in- depth workshops to analyze the planning issues underpinning the ADCD Vision Plan; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2021, Zyscovich presented a draft conceptual plan to the City Commission summarizing the proposed concepts and recommendations for the ADCD Vision Plan, and the City Commission supported Zyscovich's direction and ideas surrounding urban planning and Lummus Park; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2021 , the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-31885, authorizing the City to increase the Zyscovich scope to include a Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate and Phasing Plan for the ADCD Vision Plan in order to assist the Mayor, City Commission, and the Administration in evaluating the next steps following preparation of the ADCD Vision Plan and determining whether to implement the Project on an incremental or phased basis; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2021 , Zyscovich presented the draft ADCD Vision Plan to the Panel and provided the Panel an opportunity to offer input and commentary, allowing Zyscovich to incorporate the Panel's suggestions into the Vision Plan, including: modifications to the proposed landscape scheme options and updating renderings to better depict retention of the existing coconut palm canopy; illustrating potential options for installing public art and an urban plaza at the street end at 10th Street; and enhancing the persuasiveness of the proposal via additional renderings and aerial images which convey the "before and after" transition from existing to proposed conditions; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2021 , the City and Zyscovich executed Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement authorizing the additional scope pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-31885; and WHEREAS, the Panel convened on February 18, 2022 to discuss and prepare a final report of its activities and recommendations which was transmitted to the Mayor and City Commission via Letter to Commission No. 069-2022; and WHEREAS, the enhancement and management of the ADCD is a priority of the Mayor, City Commission, and the Administration, and over the past year, the Administration, including members of the senior management team, have engaged in the ADCD Vision Plan development process, providing information, highlighting concerns as necessary, and offering feedback on the recommendations; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan document, which is an exhibit to the City Commission Memorandum accompanying this Resolution, compiles maps, diagrams, images, and narrative text to develop recommendations on a broad range of topics including urban design and character, transportation priorities and concepts, suggested changes in land use and zoning regulations, and expansion of Lummus Park and potential approaches to its management; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan emphasizes the need for prioritizing people and pedestrians, open public spaces, well-designed buildings and streetscapes, and limited vehicle access zones with slower traffic; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan is developed upon six (6) foundational principles: (1) protect character and history; (2) rebalance hotels, hospitality industry, and residential activities; (3) expand the physical landscape by creating a great park and public spaces; (4) create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan; (5) enhance the character, quality, and value of street activity during day/night; and (6) manage density and welcome all people; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan developed these six (6) foundational principles through several recommendations falling under four (4) overarching concepts: (1) expansion of the landscape into a great park, (2) management of Lummus Park, (3) creating a balanced transit and mobility plan, and (4) balancing interests to generate incentives and restrictions which guide and implement desired policies; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan proposes a reimagination and expansion of Lummus Park to activate the approximately fifteen (15) acres of hardpack area between the serpentine walkway and dunes; Lummus Park would also be extended eastward to the façades of Ocean Drive buildings and the Ocean Drive vehicular right-of-way relocated further east as a winding accessway (proposed with three mobility options including two-way vehicular, one-way vehicular, and pedestrian-only access); and WHEREAS, by re-imagining Lummus Park and effectively doubling its size, the ADCD Vision Plan proposes increasing the programming activities within the park for recreation, arts and culture, and other public uses; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan proposes creating a park conservancy, transferring management responsibilities for the reimagined Lummus Park from the City to a private, not-for-profit organization that can support and enhance its maintenance, capital development, programming, and advocacy based on the needs of the community; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan proposes three (3) distinct transportation and mobility plans for each of the three (3) major corridors in the District; (1) Ocean Drive is envisioned as a pedestrian-priority street with an extremely wide sidewalk/promenade next to the buildings that allow pedestrians to feel like they are in Lummus Park; (2) Collins Avenue is a shared transit street, or curbless "woonerf' serving local transit access and vehicles driving next to people walking and biking; and (3) Washington Avenue is proposed as a direct access transit street with dedicated bus lanes in the middle of the street, one through lane for automobiles and other vehicles, and a protected bicycle lane on both sides of the street; and WHEREAS, the ADCD Vision Plan proposed changes to balance the needs and maintain the character of Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue through limited and strategic zoning incentives to encourage reinvestment and preservation of the historic building stock; and WHEREAS, as the Administration participated in the review of the ADCD Vision Plan concepts and recommendations, the Administration acknowledges potential administrative, legal, and financial challenges that would require substantial further study and could impact implementation; and WHEREAS, Zyscovich was tasked with developing a comprehensive and holistic long-term framework and vision for the ADCD and, as such, the ADCD Vision Plan does not propose definitive specifications; and WHEREAS, the ACDC Vision Plan includes recommended action items that are categorized as near term, medium term, and long term, and the ADCD Vision Plan is a guide that the Mayor and City Commission could choose to implement in phases and increments over an extended period; and WHEREAS, there are opportunities to move forward with ADCD Vision Plan design development and implementation for certain projects by leveraging G.O. Bond funds, grants, and other resources; and WHEREAS, existing funding and plans for water, sewer, and stormwater replacement would need to be integrated with any future design and based on preliminary cost estimates, the Administration anticipates being able to move forward with the Ocean Drive project; and WHEREAS, the Administration requested input from the Mayor and City Commission on the Vision Plan as drafted, and direction to proceed, as deemed necessary, including authorization to take the next steps in implementing aspects of the Vision Plan as part of the programming for the voter-approved G.O. Bond Project #31 for Ocean Drive, including development of an RFQ to include Lummus Park, as envisioned by the Vision Plan, subject to available funding. WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the ADCD Vision Plan, in concept, and requested that the Administration prepare a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") seeking qualified design professionals for the Ocean Drive G.O. Bond project and to include Lummus Park, if funding is available, with the RFQ to be submitted to the City Commission for consideration and approval prior to issuance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the Art Deco Cultural District ("ADCD") Vision Plan, in concept, and authorize the Administration to take the next steps in implementing aspects of the ADCD Vision Plan as part of the programming for the voter-approved G.O. Bond Project #31 for Ocean Drive, and prepare a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for design development and construction administration services for the Ocean Drive G.O. Bond project, with the inclusion of Lummus Park, if funding is identified and available, with the RFQ to be submitted to the Mayor and City Commission for consideration and approval prior to issuance. PASSED and ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of February 2022. 1 :2-21------___. v/ ATTEST: Dan Gelber, Mayor Rafael . Granado, City le k g ' . : ?,, I99'IP!(CRPAORH1CD' ,,,6.. 20`'`::APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION r- --- Li ►(i-' % City Attorney Date New Business and Commission Requests - R9 A MAM BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Alina T. Hudak, City Manager DATE: February 23, 2022 SUBJECT: ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT VISION PLAN. BACKGROUND/HISTORY To view Attachment B, please visit: https://docmgmt.miamibeachfl.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx? id=279874&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA TBD FINANCIAL INFORMATION TBD Applicable Area South Beach Is this a "Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item, pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? Yes Yes Strategic Connection Prosperity - Market and promote Miami Beach as a world class arts, culture. and quality entertainment destination. Legislative Tracking Economic Development ATTACHMENTS: Page 196 of 306 3 Description D ADCD Vision Plan Commission Memorandum D Attachment A(Executive Summary) Page 197 of 306 4 DocuSign Envelope ID 33694F0E-OEFF-4958-A8A8-44F10D930DEC MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive. Miami Beach. Florida 33139. www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dan Gelber and Members of the City Commission ADS FROM: Alina Hudak, City Manager Q� DATE: February 23, 2022 SUBJECT:ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT VISION PLAN (LAND USE, MOBILITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY OF THE ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31388) Recommendation The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission 1) accept the Zyscovich ADCD Vision Plan in concept, and authorize the Administration, with policy input, to continue examination and vetting of the recommended implementation Action Items; and 2)authorize the Administration to develop a Request for Qualifications(RFQ), consistent with the voter-approved G.O. Bond Project #31 — Ocean Drive Corridor (the "Project"), to select and award a firm for the design development, and construction administration services of the Project; and further authorize the Administration to incorporate Lummus Park in the RFQ, as defined by the Vision Plan, to be submitted to the City Commission for consideration and authorization prior to issuance. Background On May 10, 2019, the City issued RFQ No. 2019-234-ND for a land use, mobility, and economic development study of the City's Mixed-Use Entertainment("MXE") district, also known as the Art Deco Cultural District ("ADCD" or the "District"). The RFQ sought qualifications from multi-disciplinary teams to perform a study covering properties and areas adjacent to commercial corridors including Washington Avenue, Collins Avenue, and Ocean Drive (the "Vision Plan"). The solicitation indicated that any recommendations resulting from the Project, as adopted by the City Commission, would form the basis for more extensive projects, specifically the voter-approved Ocean Drive and Washington Avenue G.O. Bond projects. On July 31, 2019, per Resolution No. 2019-30914, the City Commission authorized negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., d/b/a Zyscovich Architects ("Zyscovich"), as the top- ranked bidder, and authorized execution of an agreement if negotiations were successful. On July 29, 2020, the City Commission referred to the Land Use and Sustainability Committee a special workshop on the Art Deco Cultural District. The September 17, 2020 special ADCD workshop discussed the development of a comprehensive strategy for the District that would address issues such as public safety, mobility, land use, and economic development. On September 16, 2020, via Resolution No. 2020-31388, the City Commission reaffirmed Page 198 of 306 5 DocuSign Envelope ID 33694F0E-OEFF-4958-A8A8-44F10D930DEC Commission Memo-ADCD Vision Plan February 23, 2022 Page 2 of 6 the award of the contract to Zyscovich.. The Commission Memorandum accompanying the Resolution attached a July 9, 2020 correspondence from the South Beach Alliance, a stakeholder coalition comprised of the Ocean Drive Association,Washington Avenue BID, Lincoln Road BID, Collins Improvement Association, and the Espanola Way Association, urging the Mayor and City Commission to execute an agreement with Zyscovich pursuant to the RFQ. Accordingly, on October 11, 2020, the City and Zyscovich entered into a professional services agreement. In accordance with his authority pursuant to Section 2-27(b)(2) of the City Code, Mayor Gelber issued a December 7, 2020 memorandum creating the Mayor's Art Deco Cultural District Panel (the "Panel"), to provide recommendations regarding the ADCD and serve in an advisory capacity to the city's consultant. On June 23, 2021, Bernard Zyscovich presented a draft conceptual plan to the City Commission summarizing the proposed concepts and recommendations for the Vision Plan. Presented as a progress report,the City Commission was generally receptive to the consultant's bold direction and ideas surrounding urban planning and Lummus Park and offered support for the transformative nature of his vision. On October 13, 2021,the Mayor and City Commission authorized the City to increase the Zyscovich scope to include a Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate and Phasing Plan for the Vision Plan. This analysis would assist the Mayor and City Commission and the Administration with evaluating the next steps following preparation of the Vision Plan and how to implement the Project on an incremental or phased basis. On December 22, 2021, the City and Zyscovich Architects executed Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement authorizing the additional scope. On February 14, 2022, Zyscovich submitted the final draft of the ADCD Vision Plan to the Administration. See Exhibit A (Executive Summary) and Exhibit B (ADCD Vision Plan). Mayor's ADCD Panel Since January 8, 2021, the Panel of resident and business community stakeholders has met 22 times at publicly noticed meetings also attended by the City Administration and members of the public.The Panel received presentations and updates from subject matter experts including the consultant team led by Zyscovich,with sub-consultants Town Square Corp., Kittelson & Associates, Lambert Advisory, Gehl, and Raymond Jungles Landscaping, in addition to multiple City Departments and guest speakers including urbanist Richard Florida. Initial meetings of the Panel included presentations and discussions regarding Ocean Drive traffic configuration options and side street challenges,enhancement of public safety measures, proposed amendments to the Land Development Regulations, and the Consultant's proposal for expansion of Lummus Park. Zyscovich and the consultant team delivered several in-depth workshops to analyze the planning issues underpinning the Vision Plan: • On March 12, 2021, sub-consultant Kittelson & Associates presented on Transportation and Mobility Initial Observations, with topics including transit routes, modal priorities, safety issues,and curb management.The Panel displayed interest in the pre-COVID-19 statistical data demonstrating decreasing dependence on automobiles in favor of bicycle and pedestrian movement. • On March 26, 2021, sub-consultants Gehl Architects and Town Square presented Page 199 of 306 6 DocuSign Envelope ID.33894F0E-OEFF-4958-A8A8-44F10D930DEC Commission Memo—ADCD Vision Plan February 23, 2022 Page 3 of 6 on Street Life and Programming, introducing the concept of an independent management entity for Lummus Park. The Panel embraced concepts presented including the need to identify shared priorities to guide ADCD planning, consideration of effective management models for Lummus Park, and building awareness for"putting people first" in the design process. • On April 23, 2021, Zyscovich and sub-consultant Lambert Advisory led a discussion on Retail, Tourism, and Entertainment Potential, including the office market as it relates to the District, how to encourage certain uses and business operations, and how an expansion of the Lummus Park footprint could benefit the economic vitality of Ocean Drive. • On May 21, 2021, Zyscovich led an intensive workshop on Urban Design, Open Space, Mobility, and Transit, held in person at the historic Carlton Hotel on Collins Avenue. As Zyscovich presented his vision for the character of the Distract, the Panel generally expressed support for the Vision Plan's identified objectives, such as protecting the District's history and character; rebalancing hotels, the hospitality industry, and residential activities; expanding the landscape to create a great park and public spaces; enhancing the character of the street scenes; and managing density to welcome all people. During a subsequent discussion on June 4, 2021, the Panel expressed concern with compatibility issues related to increasing the number of residential uses in the District and agreed that access control tactics such as congestion price or physical barriers deem further exploration. • On June 18, 2021, Zyscovich and sub-consultant Lambert Advisory presented Land Use and Zoning considerations including discussion with the Panel of east- west connections in the District, activation of alleyways, and responsive management of public spaces. Although the Panel remained conflicted as to the appropriate configuration of traffic and mobility on Ocean Drive, the Panel advocated for greater consideration for the shared dynamic in the street among bicycles, vehicles, and pedestrians. • On July 16, 2021, the Panel adopted a motion, documented in LTC 310-2021, to express support for the City Commission's initiatives and the allocation of funding for cultural activations in Lummus Park and elsewhere in the ADCD. Recognizing the important role of placemaking, cultural activations should be community- building and based on an educational or nonprofit ideology. On December 17, 2021, Zyscovich presented the draft Vision Plan to the Panel and provided the committee an opportunity to offer input and commentary. Accordingly, Zyscovich incorporated the Panel's suggestions into the Vision Plan, including: modifications to the proposed landscape scheme options and updating renderings to better depict retention of the existing coconut palm canopy; illustrating potential options for installing public art and an urban plaza at the street end at 10th Street; and enhancing the persuasiveness of the proposal via additional renderings and aerial images which convey the "before and after"transition from existing to proposed conditions. The Panel convened on February 18, 2022 to discuss and prepare a final report of its activities and recommendations to be transmitted via Letter to Commission. ANALYSIS Page 200 of 306 7 DocuSign Envelope ID 33B94FOF-0EFF-4958-A8A8-44F 10D930DEC Commission Memo-ADCD Vision Plan February 23, 2022 Page 4 of 6 The enhancement and management of the Art Deco Cultural District has been a major priority of the Mayor and City Commission and the Administration. Over the past year, the Administration, including members of the senior management team, has been engaged in the Vision Plan development process, providing information, highlighting concerns as necessary, and offering feedback on the recommendations. The Administration has also facilitated and participated in preliminary meetings between regulatory agencies and Zyscovich. The Vision Plan The Vision Plan document compiles maps, diagrams, images, and narrative text to develop recommendations on a broad range of topics including urban design and character, transportation priorities and concepts, suggested changes in land use and zoning regulations, and expansion of Lummus Park and potential approaches to its management. The Vision Plan emphasizes the need for prioritizing people and pedestrians, open public spaces, well-designed buildings and streetscapes, and limited vehicle access zones with slower traffic. The Vision Plan is developed upon six (6)foundational principles: 1. protect character and history; 2. rebalance hotels, hospitality industry, and residential activities; 3. expand the physical landscape by creating a great park and public spaces; 4. create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan; 5. enhance the character, quality, and value of street activity during day/night; and 6. manage density and welcome all people. The Vision Plan develops these principles through several recommendations falling under four overarching concepts: expansion of the landscape into a great park, management of Lummus Park, creating a balanced transit and mobility plan, and balancing interests to generate incentives and restrictions which guide and implement desired policies. Policy direction and guidance related to the following overarching concepts is critical. Expand the physical landscape by creating a great park and public spaces. The Vision Plan proposes a reimagination and expansion of Lummus Park to activate the 15 acres of hardpack area between the serpentine walkway and dunes. The park would also be extended eastward to the façades of Ocean Drive buildings and the Ocean Drive vehicular right-of-way relocated further east as a winding accessway(proposed with three mobility options including two-way vehicular, one-way vehicular and pedestrian-only access). By re-imagining Lummus Park and effectively doubling its size, the Vision Plan proposes increasing the programming activities within the park for recreation, arts and culture, and other public uses. Establish a conservancy to manage Lummus Park. The Vision Plan proposes transferring management responsibilities for the reimagined Lummus Park from the City to a private, not-for-profit organization that can support and enhance its maintenance, capital development, programming, and advocacy based on the needs of the community. Create a balanced transit and mobility plan. The Vision Plan proposes three (3) distinct transportation and mobility plans for each of the three major corridors in the District. Ocean Drive is envisioned as a pedestrian-priority street with an extremely wide sidewalk/promenade next to the buildings that allow pedestrians to feel like they are in Lummus Park. The street is re-designed as a low-capacity road with drop-off zones on each block to allow for pick up and drop off close to buildings. Collins Avenue is a shared Page 201 of 306 8 DocuSign Envelope ID 33B94F0E-OEFF-4958-A8A8-44F10D930DEC Commission Memo-ADCD Vision Plan February 23, 2022 Page 5of6 transit street, or curbless "woonerf' serving local transit access and vehicles driving next to people walking and biking. Washington Avenue is proposed as a direct access transit street with dedicated bus lanes in the middle of the street, one through lane for automobiles and other vehicles, and a protected bicycle lane on both sides of the street. The Washington Avenue concept assumes that Miami-Dade County will develop its proposed high-capacity transit connection between Miami Beach and the mainland (referred to as The Beach Corridor). For the east-west side streets which extend from Washington Avenue to Ocean Drive, the Vision Plan proposes reducing travel to one lane in order to manage access and address mobility issues currently affecting the District. Balance interest of property and business owners, residents, and visitors and generate incentives and restrictions to guide and implement desired policies. The Vision Plan recommends proposed changes to balance the needs and maintain the character of Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue through limited and strategic zoning incentives to encourage reinvestment and preservation of the historic building stock. As staff has participated in review of the Vision Plan's bold concepts and recommendations, the Administration acknowledges potential administrative, legal, and financial challenges that would require further study and could impact implementation.The concept of a conservancy for management of Lummus Park, congestion pricing, zoning incentives, and potential Miami-Dade County charter issues must be examined further. Zyscovich was tasked with developing a comprehensive and holistic long-term framework and vision for the District and as such, the Vision Plan does not propose definitive specifications. The conceptual vision would require substantial further analysis before the conceptual elements could be implemented.. Although the Vision Plan includes recommended action items that are categorized as near term, medium term, and long term, the Vision Plan was drafted as a guide that the Mayor and City Commission could choose to implement in phases and increments over an extended period of time. Zyscovich's scope of work was amended to include a Rough Order of Magnitude construction cost estimate, which was prepared and submitted to the Administration for review. The cost estimate has been evaluated by staff and used as a foundation to develop an overall preliminary cost estimate inclusive of construction administration and services, contingency, project management services, fees, and other soft costs. Existing funding and plans for water, sewer,and stormwater replacement would need to be integrated with any future design. There may also be funding available via grants and other funding sources. Currently, funding for the related G.O. Bond Program projects includes$20 million for Ocean Drive,$10 million for Washington Avenue and$4.7 million for Lummus Park. Based on preliminary cost estimates, the Administration anticipates being able to move forward with the Ocean Drive project. SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA According to the 2019 Community Satisfaction Survey, over the past ten years, residents decreasingly believe that the tourism industry in Miami Beach adds to the overall quality of life. The lowest point in this annual trend occurred in 2019, when only 42% of residents polled believed that tourism enhances quality of life. The same research by the ETC Institute revealed that businesses rate most perceptions of the City higher than residents. Whereas 89% of businesses polled believe that Miami Beach tourism adds value to the business community. The Vision Plan proposes to encourage a balance between the needs of residents, tourists, and businesses. Page 202 of 306 9 DocuSign Envelope ID:33B94F0E-OEFF-4958-A8A8-44F 10D930DEC Commission Memo-ADCD Vision Plan February 23, 2022 Page 6 of 6 FISCAL IMPACT The scope of the professional services agreement with Zyscovich, as defined in the RFQ, conform with descriptions for the G.O. Bond projects related to Ocean Drive and Washington Avenue. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-31693, the City Commission accepted the recommendation of the G.O. Bond Oversight Committee to revise the G.O. Bond Implementation Plan, which made some funding available for the design of both these projects,which had originally been earmarked for later tranches. The$602,000 total project cost for Zyscovich's work has been funded by available Tranche 1 G.O. Bond funds for Ocean Drive and Washington Avenue G.O. Bond projects. While the Administration has some concerns related to the cost of funding all elements of the Vision Plan, there are opportunities to move forward with design development and implementation for certain projects by leveraging G.O. Bond funds, grants and other resources. CONCLUSION The Administration respectfully requests input from the Mayor and City Commission on the Vision Plan as drafted, and direction to proceed, as deemed necessary, including authorization to take the next steps in implementing aspects of the Vision Plan as part of the programming for the voter-approved G.O. Bond Project#31 for Ocean Drive, including development of an RFQ to include Lummus Park, as envisioned by the Vision Plan. Once prepared, the RFQ would be brought to the City Commission for consideration and approval. Exhibits Attachment A ADCD Vision Plan Executive Summary Attachment B Draft ADCD Vision Plan [ fDS C Page 203 of 306 10 ATTACHMENT A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since its very inception, Miami Beach has evolved,changed, adapted, and reimagined itself numerous times. These past years have been no exception. The pandemic has shown us once again that as a community we are resilient and able to adapt but what does the future hold? This document is intended to envision what that future might be like if we would look at all the important influences comprehensively. The ideas presented in this vision plan represent the integrated thinking of multiple disciplines and experts all pulling in the direction of protecting, leveraging and reimagining the assets of the world-renowned Art Deco Cultural District. It is a vision plan not a design document and needs to be considered within the framework of high-level thinking intended to be evaluated and implemented as a blueprint for moving forward. Visualizations and illustrations are intended to illustrate the concept and not necessarily to indicate a preferred design solution. Although it articulates ideas by subject it is vital to appreciate that these parts are all interdependent and together create the complete vision. For the sake of digesting the information we have also included a matrix of"action items". The Art Deco Historic District is the iconic image of Miami Beach in the eyes of the world, although it seems we exist in a paradoxical time.While to some it may appear as though things are not going well,with unwanted behaviour and logistical problems, the opposite is also true; Miami Beach is internationally known and has never been more highly valued. High end brands are coming into the city, recent redevelopment of new hotels have been successful,and property values have never been higher.The City of Miami Beach ("City") needs to leverage the ongoing success of the area to envision a district that can effectively accommodate the interests of the hotels, hospitality industry,visitors,and residents,and further elevate Miami Beach's status as a global destination. THE VISION PLAN As a result of the visioning process, a plan has been developed which encourages the transformation of the Art Deco Cultural District (ADCD), emphasizing the importance of walkable development throughout the District. This document contains a compilation of maps, diagrams, images, and text describing recommendations on a broad range of topics including potential district management approach, urban design character, Lummus Park expansion, transportation concepts, and potential changes in the land use, zoning and incentives for the Vision Area and emphasizes the need for such things as well-designed buildings and streetscapes, open space, limited vehicle access zones with slower traffic, and new bicycle routes. The study area includes the city blocks and corridors between 5th Street to the South, 17th Street to the North, Lummus Park to the East, and Washington Avenue to the West. ZYSCOVICH 1 i 11 The Art Deco Cultural District Vision Plan is based on 6 principles: 1. Protect the character and history 2. Rebalance hotels, hospitality industry and residential activities 3. Expand the landscape and create a great park and public spaces 4. Create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan 5. Enhance the character of the street scenes during times of day/night 6. Manage density and be welcoming of all people KEY CONCEPTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE VISION PLAN 1. EXPAND THE LANDSCAPE AND CREATE A GREAT PARK, PUBLIC SPACES AND CULTURAL OFFERINGS The project intends to reimagine the entire space from the front porch of the Ocean Drive buildings to the existing dunes as the park. Approximately 15 acres of hardpack between the serpentine wall and the dune should be incorporated into the overall park design. By doubling the size of the park and providing mobility options within the space we can provide for all modes of movement that will satisfy all of the functional aspects of access.The new approach to the park will bring nature closer into the City, integrating the beach and dune into the park as a resilient landscape space. Under the premise of connectivity, the park will increase its transparency, will allow users to see and be seen, as part of the historic character of Ocean Drive.Access to the park will be facilitated and more program opportunities will activate areas otherwise unused. There is an opportunity to take advantage of Lummus Park, which is an exceptional space but is currently underutilized,and by doubling its size,facilitate many programming opportunities such as recreation,arts and culture as well as support space for City functions and events. The side streets if likewise re-imagined,would offer additional planting space providing shade,visual interest, and additional drainage infiltration areas for stormwater. Landscape corridors could bring pollinators and other species back to the City, and potentially tie everything together and connect park and City as part of a larger ecosystem. The overarching objective is to re-imagine Lummus park and bring the landscape all the way west throughout the District. 2. ESTABLISH A CONSERVANCY TO MANAGE LUMMUS PARK AND POTENTIALLY THE OVERALL DISTRICT A Conservancy,an independent 501c3 organization,could be set up to manage the park on behalf of the City. A diverse board bridging private, public, and civic sectors will ensure the Conservancy's mission best serves the public's interest. A specific management agreement with the City will establish its scope of action. It will fundraise from several sources and increase the resources available to the park. Its professional staff, ZYSCOVICH 21 12 dedicated to Lummus Park, will offer a world-class park experience to visitors. Over time, this organization could increase its responsibilities in the overall neighbourhood, managing deliveries, waste, security, and events. 3. CREATE A BALANCED TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN It is intended to prepare for the future mobility needs of the District by taking advantage of proposed high- capacity transit connections to the mainland, managing parking availability through parking and curbside management strategies,and re-purposing roadway space to provide safe and comfortable facilities to priority users, including people walking and biking in the District. The proposed multimodal corridor planning study, led by the City,would satisfy FDOT and Miami-Dade County requirements while identifying the feasibility, project development and engineering (PD&E), and preferred alternative concept designs associated with the transit and mobility plan recommendations. Restricted Vehicle Access The purpose is to create a pedestrian/bicycle priority area by deprioritizing automobiles in the District. The restricted vehicular zone East of Washington Avenue is proposed in one of two(2)ways: congestion charging and/or restricted access. Ocean Drive - Park+Pedestrian Street The intention is for Ocean Drive to be a pedestrian priority street with extremely wide sidewalks next to the buildings and to feel as if it is part of the park. The street should be designed as an infrequent vehicle movement/ low-capacity road and not intended for through trips.With drop-off zones in each block that would allow for passengers to be picked up/drop-off closer to the buildings. Collins Avenue - Shared Transit Street Collins Avenue is intended as the shared local transit street with a circulator that would allow local north-south movement within the District. This street is proposed to have the same number of existing through lanes but envisioned as a curbless(woonerf)road that provides local transit access, with vehicles driving next to people biking and/or walking. ZYSCOVICH 3 13 Washington Avenue - District Access Transit Street The proposal intends to have dedicated bus lanes in the middle of the street with either bus stations, median/ landscaping or left turn lanes, that can be used as needed strategically along the corridor. Outside of those, there would be one through lane and protected raised cycle track on both sides of the street in separate directions as well as curbside usage on the East side of the street, which includes on-street parking, loading zone, ride-share spaces, and pickup/drop-off zones. 5th Street+Lincoln Road- Transit Plaza/Transfer Station The basis for this proposal is to bring the high-capacity transit connection (The Beach Corridor) to the intersection of 5th Street and Washington Avenue,so that it is near the beach access and activity areas of the District. It would also be the area where we start to implement the restricted vehicles access. During the interim condition,even without the transit in place,this zone can still become a limited vehicular access zone. The Lincoln Road Transit Mall and Transfer Station is proposed to have transit-only lanes(transit mall)and the transfer station in the center of the street with through lanes on each side. East/West Connection - One Way Streets It is proposed to make the East-West streets as one-way pairs versus two-way traffic. One way street provide additional room for expanding one side of the sidewalk and separated bike lanes, improving the landscape, prioritizing walking and biking facilities, and providing for loading zones and commercial vehicle circulation, and pick-up/drop-off/valet zones between Washington Avenue and Ocean Drive. 4. BALANCE INTEREST OF PROPERTY & BUSINESS OWNERS, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS & GENERATE INCENTIVES AND RESTRICTIONS TO GUIDE AND IMPLEMENT DESIRED POLICIES The Zoning Incentives Recommendations for Collins Avenue and Ocean Drive in the MXE District will serve to assist the City in implementing the goals and objectives of the ADCD Vision Plan. The intent of the proposed changes to the existing MXE zoning designation is to balance the needs and maintain the character of Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue but allow limited zoning incentives that would encourage people to quickly reinvest in the properties while protecting the historic character of the District. ZYSCOVICH 4I 14 r i 3::';*.:.. I" '.'',.,,,,,,-.,,..,,1,`"..,,,,,,,,,:::::.,,i ART ,,,,, i ,,,,,,,,,, ,, ...... \‘‘,„k DECO .. , CULTURAL , .. .. . DISTRICT ., ... , . . .. 1- ii, iiA i,l'' ' ."- ' - ,- - 'lf"-1,'l-1,4-"':;:;:-.,-:1:":,,,,::: A r t� , , ` 4 D y�„ iiiii, . ...„ , __, , , „ , , „„,,,,, ,,,..,..i'l„i4.:.,i,,i, ,..40T ; co b y PI 2. T EIli PREPARED FOR: E THE CITY OF MIAMI B ACH PRLPARf'D 6Y' - " ZYSCOVICH ....off ' IN COLLABORATION WITII• ,y {` .KI ELSON ul �es b Geht TOWN C•: SQUARE f'".... •SSOCIATES g ADVISORY DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 0) DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT _, .., VISION PLAN FEBRUARY 14, 2022 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH BY ZYSCOVICH IN COLLABORATION WITH LAMBERT ADVISORY, KITTLESON, TOWN SQUARE,JUNGLES AND GEHL DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Acknowledgments Zyscovich wishes to express its appreciation for the contributions of the City Manager's Office following agencies.organrrations.and individuals who participated in the City Attorney's Office preparation of this document. Economic Development Department Code Compliance Department Art Deco Cultural District Panel Fire Department Marketing and Communications Department The following individuals participated in the Art Deco Cultural District Panel Parking Department and attended regular protect related meetings and workshops.We sincerely Parks and Recreation Department appreciate their contribution and would like to give a special thanks to Chair Planning and Zoning Department Jonathan Plutnk for his tireless work and leadership for the committee. Police Department Public Works Department Jonathan Plutnk.Chair Tourism and Culture Department Jonathan Freidin,Vice Chair Transportation and Mobility Department Nisi Berryman Daniel Ciraldo Vision Plan Project Team Tom Donal! Kim Hovel Zyseodeh-Urban Design and Vision Plan Robin Jacobs Bernard ivy owl"fAIA lane Krupp Suria Val far CO Salem Mounasyer Dams Avila ten Roberts Konstantina Knt haridou John Stuart Marc Lawrence Lambert Aoklsery Eesesa is CoosoltaM Ric Doprco Paul Lambert Curtis Slipman Eric Liff City of Miami Beach Raymond Jungles-Landscape Design Consultant Raymond Jungles Thanks are due to the Economic Development Department staff members Guy Champin led by Rickelle Williams.Economic Development Director and Justin Karr. Christopher Barnes who have managed,contributed ideas.and facilitated the entire Vision Plan effort. Klttbesan&Associates-Transportation and Mobility Consultant Yolanda Takesian We would like to express our appreciation for the leadership of Alma Hudak. Slob Pochowski City Manager and Eric Carpenter.Assistant City Manager. A special thanks Jessica losselvn to Eric Carpenter who set the early efforts of the study and steadfastly kept everyone focused on the importance of a long term vision. Town Square-Conservancy Consultant Jerome Bat We also wish to thank staff from the following Miami Beach departments Amanda Wigen who contributed to this plan: Gehl- Urban Design Consultancy Julia Day Olivia Flynn DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Table of Contents Executive Summary 06 Study Area 09 Part I - How did we get HERE? and Where are we NOW? How did we get here? t7 Where are we now? 14 Expectations:What is the timeframe? 1 c; Market Opportunities and market induced evolution 18 Part II - Vision and Character for the District 21 CD Principles 7 Part III - How do we get there? Responsive management of public spaces 78 Expand the landscape and create a great park and public spaces lR Create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan 64 Enhance the character of corridors,streetscapes and alleys 138 Zoning Incentives 148 Part IV - Implementation 191 Recommendations and Action Items 192 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Executive Summary Since its very inception.Miami Beach has evolved.changed.adapted,and zoning and incentives for the Vision Area and emphasizes the need for such There is an opportunity to take advantage of I unmmus Park. which is an reimagined itself numerous times. These past years have been no exception. things as well designed buildings and streetscapes.open space,limited vehicle exceptional space but is currently underutilized, and by doubling its size. The pandemic has shown us once again that as a community we are resilient access zones with Slower traffic.and new bicycle routes. facilitate many programming opportunities such as recreation,arts and culture. and able to adapt but what does the future hold? This document is intended select limited high quality commercial opportunities.as well as support space to envision what that future might be like if we would look at all the important The study area includes the city blocks and corridors between 5th Street to for City functions and events. influences comprehensively. The ideas presented in this vision plan represent the South.17th Street to the North,Lummus Park to the East.and Washington the integrated thinking of multiple disciplines and experts all pulling in the Avenue to the West. The side streets if likewise re imagined.would offer additional planting space direction of protecting,leveraging and reimagining the assets of the world providing shade,visual interest.and additional drainage infiltration areas for renowned Art Deco Cultural District. The Art Deco Cultural District Vision Plan is developed on the foundation of stormwater. Landscape corridors mould bring pollinators and other species 6 principles: back to the City.and potentially tie everything together and connect park and It is a vision plan not a design document and needs to be considered within the City as part of a larger ecosystem. The overarching objective is to re imagine framework of high level thinking intended to be evaluated and implemented as 1..Protect the character and history Lummus park and bring the landscape west throughout the District, a blueprint for moving forward. Visualizations and illustrations are intended to illustrate the concept and not necessarily to indicate a preferred design 2.Rebalance hotel.hospitality industry and residential activities solution. Although it articulates ideas by subject it is vital to appreciate that 2. ESTABLISH A CONSERVANCY TO MANAGE. I UMMUS PARK AND these parts are all interdependent and together create the complete vision.For 3.Expand the physical landscape by creating a great park and public spaces POTENTIALLY THE OVERALL. DISTRICT ilie sake of digesting the information we have also included a matrix of"action items 4.Create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan A Conservancy.an independent 501c3 organizat ion.could he set up to manage the park on behalf of the City.A diverse board hedging private.public.and civic O The Art Deco Historic District is the iconic image of Miami Beach in the eyes 5.Enhance the character,quality,and value of the street activity during times sectors will ensure the Conservancy's mission best serves the public's interest. of the world.although it seems we exist in a paradoxical time.While to some of day/night A specific management agreement with the City will establish its scope of action. n may appear as though things are not going well,with unruly behaviour and It will fundraise from several sources and increase the resources available in logistical problems,the opposite is also true:Miami Beach is internationally 6.Manage density and be welcoming of all people the park.Its professional staff,dedicated to Lummus Park.will offer a world known and have never been more highly valued.Some of the most well known class park experience to visitors,Over time,this organization could increase names in private equity and tech have started to call the City home in the KEY CONCEPTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE VISION PLAN its responsibilities in the overall neighborhood.managing deliveries,waste, past two years.recent redevelopment of new hotels have been successful. security.and events. and property values have never been higher.The City of Miami Beach rCity-1 1.. EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A GREAT PARK. needs to leverage the ongoing success of the area to envision a district that PUBLIC SPACES AND CULTURAL OFFERINGS 3.CREATE A BALANCED TRANSIT AND MOBIL ITV PLAN can effectively accommodate the interests of the hotels.hospitality industry. visitors.workers.and residents,and further elevate Miami Beach's status as The project intends to reimagtne the entire space from the front porch of the It is intended to prepare for the future mobility needs of the District by taking a global destination. Ocean Drive buildings to the existing dunes as the park.Approximately 15 acres advantage of proposed high capacity transit connections to the mainland, of hardpack between the serpentine wall and the dune should be incorporated managing parking availability through parking and curbside management THE VISION PLAN into the overall park design. By doubling the size of the park and providing strategies.and re purposing roadway space to provide safe and comfortable mobility options within the space we can provide for all modes of movement facilities to priority users.including people walking and hiking in the Dtslric.t. As a result of the visioning process, a plan has been developed which that will satisfy all of the functional aspects of access.The new approach to the encourages the transformation of the Art Deco Cultural District tADCDI. park will bring nature closer into the City.integrating the beach and dune into The proposed multimodal corridor planning study.led by the City.would satisfy emphasizing the importance of walkable development throughout the District. the park as a resilient landscape space.Under the premise of connectivity.the FDOT and Miami Dade County requirements while identifying the feasibility. Thus document contains a compilation of maps.diagrams,images.and text park will increase its transparency,will allow users to see and be seen,as part project development and engineering I PDRE i,and preferred alternative concept describing recommendations on a broad range of topics including potential of the historic character of Ocean Drive.Access to the park will be facilitated designs associated with the transit and mobility plan recommendations. district management approach. urban design character. Lummus Park and more program opportunities will activate areas otherwise unused. expansion.transportation concepts.and potential changes in the land use. I Al if t VIaiN lit AN.(Ill i ll MIAMI HI A(-H DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Restricted Vehicle Access During the interim condition.even without the transit in place.this zone can still become a limited vehicular access zone. the purowa.;5 to create a pedestrian/bicycle priority area by deprioritinng automobiles in the District.The restricted vehicular zone East of Washington The Lincoln Road Transit Mall and Transfer Station is proposed to have transit Avenue is proposed in one of two 121 ways: congestion charging andjor only lanes(transit mall)and the transfer station in the center of the street with restncted access. through lanes on each side. Ocean Drive-Park+Pedestrian Street East/West Connection-One Way Streets The intention is for Ocean Drive to he a pedestrian priority street with extremely It is proposed to make the East West streets as one way pairs versus two wide sidewalks next to the buildings and to feel as if it is part of the park.The way traffic.One way streets provide additional room for expanding one side of street should be designed as an infrequent vehicle movement/low capacity the sidewalk and separated bike lanes,improving the landscape,prioritizing road and not intended for through trips.With drop off zones in each block that walking and biking facilities.and providing for loading zones and commercial would allow fnr passengers to he perked up/drop-off closer to the buildings. vehicle circulation. and pick up/drop off/valet zones between Washington Avenue and Ocean Drive. Collins Avenue-Shared Transit Street 4.BALANCE INTEREST OF PROPERTY&BUSINESS OWNERS.RESIDENTS Collins Avenue is intended as the shared local transit street with a circulator AND VISITORS&GENERATE INCENTIVES AND RESTRICTIONS TO GUIDE: N that would allow local north south movement within the District.This street is AND IMPLEMENT DESIRED POLICIES Proposed to have the same number of existing through lanes but envisioned as a curbless Iwoonerf I road that provides local transit access.wits vehicles The Zoning Incentives Recommendations for Collins Avenue and Ocean Drive driving next to people biking and/or walking, in the MXE District will serve to assist the City in implementing the goals and oblectives of the ADCD Vision Plan.The intent of the proposed changes to the Washington Avenue-District Access Transit Street existing MXE zoning designation is to balance the needs and maintain the character of Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue hut allow targeted and strategic The proposal intends to have dedicated bus lanes in the middle of the street zoning incentives that would encourage people to quickly reinvest in the with either bus stations,median/landscaping or left turn lanes.that can be properties while protecting the historic character of the District. used as needed strategically along the corridor.Outside of those.there would lie one through lane and protected raised cycle track on both sides of the street in separate directions as well as curbside usage on the East side of the street,which includes on street parking.loading zone.ride-share spaces.and pickup/drop off zones. 5th Street+Lincoln Road-Transit Plaza/Transfer Station he basis for this proposal is to bring the high capacity transit connection The Beach Corridor)to the intersection of 5th Street and Washington Avenue. so that it is near the beach access and activity areas of the District.It would also he the area where we start to implement the restricted vehicles access. i'i'l I'1171 11!nill .i 0 it DRAFT REPORT#4 —02.14.2022 , r .,•:: . : . . .. • . M I D TOW - x4l.-. ,,,,„` 10"el AMI ID EACH N W l -.? r LINCOLN WYNW[1[10 i ROA R • , , Olt;3 i .., M.I.A. 11.111111111. 1 -11%,_ ,.-IVAIRPORT IV • a,! • ,, , rq4.4 det Iz u 11 �jf 4 DOWNTOW .1i- ,.;. MIAMI e _ o QiIAM .: ,v .. _ _ WEST • B ' IF • DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 /- 4 P.11.1111.1111k ,.<4P '1 t ar r Study Area '`. I. a.. . fe R ri li . fiN The Art Deco Cultural District Vision Study Area includes the city ' blocks and corridors between 5th Street to the South.17th Street f : . to the North,Lummus Park to the East.and Washington Avenue A "r't I t . to the West.The physical characteristics of the main corridors r within the Art Deco Cultural District such as Ocean Drive.Collins STUDY �9OUNDA 11.4 F" I . ' Avenue and Washington Avenue.are all very different from each 1 other and will require independent review as to their character I I a and development potential. The Mixed Use Entertainment t... .... ._ :, }.._ __ -1 district('MXE'i is situated at the center of the Study Area and I I ' , the Community Redevelopment Agency I"CRA')boundary line is to the North.There is an overlap between the ADCD Study Area. I the MXE and the CRA boundary line.The ADCD Vision Plan Study _ : I._..r ., ,. . Area man can be seen in figure 1. ( y i ,^ N. . 1 , Or I . ' IV - . 1c:; • i . •.. . • _J t r / <. t I f I �.< • f 4.� : : j ' ' I I I I i I /I Tent M } t y ; :�w I) r0t mill 2000 (I) APB.« "'" PART I . HOW DID WE GET HERE AND WHERE ARE WE NOW? DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 HOW DID WE GET HERE? To look backwards will help inform our look forward.Miami Beach Mane! Boath(t. By 1981. Miami was the murder capital of has been known for a series of cycles throughout history that has America with the highest violent crime rate in the nation. given the City its identity.Currently.we are going through another cycle.and it is not a unique moment in time. In late 19R0's and early 1990's.the LGBTQ community were pioneers in helping turn around the blighted Miami Beach. It The cycles of development in the City of Miami Beach can be soon became the fun and creative international destination that appreciated by decade.from 1920 to the present day.Between South Beach is known as today. 1930 to 1939 there was a significant amount of construction that occurred in the area. with over two million 12.000.000i Later.Miami Beach was visible all over the world for its models. square feet of development artists.celebrities.and photographers. Tourism hit a high point in the 1950's and flourished into the The city took a downturn during the beginning of the HIV/AIDS N 1960's.In the 1960's and 1970's.the Beach was known for crisis.when the city was also going through financial problems. having retirees and elderly people vacationing in the oceanfront hotels. Now Miami Beach is characterized by its annual events.Art Basel Miami Beach.the South Beach Wine&Food Festival.the Winter During the 197(1's and early 1980's.South Beach felt as if it Music ConferenceiMiami Music Week,and many others till the had no identity and there were efforts to demolish much of area with visitors throughout the year. the City's distinctive art deco architecture and replace it with new urban development. In 1976. Barbara Capitman led the charge for Miami Beach budding preservation.The Miami Beach How to recover when Architectural District was established in 1979. and by 1986 the Miami Beach City Commission created the first two historic preservation districts. The districts covered Espanola Way and you are at the TOP? most of Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue in South Beach. During the early 19R0'S there was a major Cuban exodus from Cuba to Miami and Miami Beach.A large population of prisoners were released from Cuba and sent to the United States in the AI it \'l`dt iN II AN Illy 01 MIAMI Ill Al II -� �� — vigil marks twilight o Haven't we been here before ? •re° h y , - CYCLES of development .�=°- 4 I'; i1►\711; i9. ' s Jir trio .. ,• ��1 i .- , ,. , , tiaraCa itman- ''vera eage s • ►� r got / it for p� ervation _-deceased " - ..,.�..:. �ar r 'I. . +.t 7 vie_._ •- .• . t wet** -, -'." 7 41111,",. MXE-Derelopm (Si)�y Wcade(192D-RsNat) it • �/ - ... - 'ent r Refugee Crime Troubles Police Acro �,iii Mar Biel oatlift F_T:Ifr . , t III TI • t ^ '411 I ::; In 1981 Miami was the murder - district established - 1 Q7q f I '^ capital of America with the hl t - means almost nothi, _ent crime rate in the rl 'on : • . e_J_ Elk t I � �..—, .. +.inn. ~ .�� • , _ -i1,_ : }�.i•-I� �4. la , a • Is.` , ' awe. New Cuban exodus due here • ,` s. i ""' •* e_ Graham declares state of emergency for Dade, Monroe ` ., +�►T.r.. 4,11 -_'•^^,,,=..- _- •-._+-�1c - - _ -. «...n w r.eR.�.ww a u.vr r N .0...�.r T��..`...—'�"..d-w`.5- "�.,.=Y`Y Z" tR .. ter—'. �,— •y ,. N American 1�..Y OW.M YIW M Marl,r Mc.M Women,MWM eMw '4''''l i��atriunit ,�, _ - lil I M ..".....,..4.. ..... `" DISE I, ' I ' where Have M the Models Gone? + i _ a 13:::' DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 WHERE ARE WE NOW? Ocean Drive vehicular traffic was temporarily closed in May 2020 to help restaurants recover from the pandemic by expanding outdoor dining into the roadway to help maintain social distancing. The way to recover when already at the top is to elevate the quality of the experience.Miami Beach needs to be re inventing. recreating,and adding to the elements that made the City what it is Miami Beach is internationally known and well regarded in many respects.including in terms of the beach,the opportunities with new brands coming into the city.redevelopment of new hotels. and high property values.So.what can be done to alleviate the negative aspects of the Beach without harming all of the features that have lifted the City to the pinnacle of success" WHAT DOES SUCCESS LOOK LIKE FOR THE USER AND THE CITY, ARE THEY DIFFERENT? • Family destination • Food and drink • Historic district • Residential district • Late night clubs and music • Hotel district • Shows • Natural barrier island • All of the above `I rt91 PI A. tIli U1 MI iMI Ill A(II _; DRAFT REPORT • • M1 • �, • I) A A I � i� � 1 II II .*' U N rv, ei.if�4U -• ` 'MOP ...�.... � .� �r �r it � � .. _; 44 .. I ' 'lit II �� II 1 ■ N 1 ON HE STREETS _� - ,! 0• , : 1 � 1 l LOADING ISSUES -!� , c. II - _. 0 REDEVELOPMILNT OF WASH I NGTON AV I- . -4., 14.441 __id: _ _. _ NW, . erArewFp Fr. .___ t� r r• �' . ., • ,.., . .v... _ , 40 ir, . . mid' ,', , . , .f: - i _•:; % Ai e 1k i1 ' ENT ISUE t- ►d .;,' �G s iif ■ I P- , i■ �+ - • , •. " —_ ,, ,R-VP :' � r . .` RESIDENTS •_ ,► ,� -4,.. .. , 4.r�' .. S I TO RS ,. • I.I[N /:, F P : • ' RTIES DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 EXPECTATIONS: WHAT IS THE TIMEFRAME? As mentioned before.the City of Miami Beach has seen a series of cycles through its history.In figure 2,the blue line illustrates the hotel/motel average once per square foot from 1981 2021.the orange line is the commercial sales average price per square foot from 1981 2020.and the pink line is the Miami Beach violent crimes per 100.000 population from 2000 2018(2000 is when the FBI began tracking data for this District)"The figure clearly (i) shows the increase in property value and daily room nights.and the decrease in violent crimes during these periods. The data shows that since 1981.the property value increased tremendously in 1991 1992 which is when the Loews Hotel announced it was coming to the City. the Convention Center CRAI was created.and when Fortune 500 investments started being made in the City.But it also shows the crime rate has been steadily declining since 2005. Notwithstanding the perception of where the City stands now. statistically.it is in a very successful position with crime that has decreased over the years. I 'h u('h y1'.t1 IN IA AN l II T iii MIAMI HI A(ll Cycles are happening with increasing frequency. How do we climb out this time? $1.400 y 1400 r_ $1.300 M ' 1300 r c $1.200 1700 e $1.100 v A 1 100 $1(XX) 1000 0 $SNN) r E 900E t E-- 1 n 0 MOO O . O bO n 100 O t0 $IDO - O j d 4 ._ a $60t) GOO a vi e d 400 $5(N) ' ri00 $a(N) U JI I II $:1(NI ' 300VAX) I MO $1(Nl ' I ' ' (00 $0I . 1 . 11 . I11 . 11111 1 II 111111 0 ry re) Z tO CO rn O -4 ry ri irr in cD CO CO 9 -+ Cv rn a til co co cr, O -+ Cv M *I' cft CO r` CO CT g °"' * M " A' A A RRRRRRRRRR mom MXE-Hotel/Motel (Average S/SF):1981 to 20201Source:STR1 Figure 2 MXE- Commercial Sales(Average S/SF): 1981 to 2020(Source:Miami Dade county Property Appraiser(MDCPA)1 Miami Beach Violent Crimes per 100.000 Population(Source:FBI 2000 to 20181 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND MARKET INDUCED EVOLUTION Lambert Advisory looked at the broad range of uses to understand what Of f n.t tit ADI IN!S blocks has become very difficult.As it relates to re investment within the the demand is in the city and particularly within the MXE district.. buildings.at times it has to be very strategic and surgical considering •Strong performance of office sector in Miami Beach compared to the which investmentsiimprovements are most likely to be accepted try the RESIDENTIAL MARKET OPPORTUNITY, County market overall over the past year. various owners.Because of the difficulties of being able to get multiple owners to agree,it also makes it very unlikely for these buildings to The rental demand has far outpaced supply for a very long time.Since •Absorption has been modest but partially a result of a lack of product. experience reinvestment in the near/mid/long term. 2012.the city has had only one new development with more than twenty Demand exists hut is still relatively modest. 201 rental units.Every other new development during that time,that has One of the major challenges to investment is market obsolesce of been specifically designed for rental,has been on small properties with • High land values in City's commercial districts due to strength of certain components of existing buildings. less than ten 1101 units.There has been virtually no rental development tourism and local resident demand for services has encouraged new that has occurred in the past decade.On the condominium side,since office development to be built outside of the City. •Hotel rooms along Ocean are very small and have difficultly achieving, 2016.there has been between 500 600 condominium units built,which competitive rates when compared to modem/molermred properties in is also a very conservative amount considering the demand in the area. •To the extent that the technology and finance sectors continue to drive Miami Beach. local demand,these users are not as price sensitive as it relates to HI SIb!NUM Mt API INF S occupancy cost if they want to be in a particular location. Physical nature of buddings makes them difficult to reconligure rooms in the same footprint. N • Substantial condominium residential demand for the foreseeable •Two drivers of location decision for office: future in all areas of Miami Beach •Where the local chief executive lives •Nature of older buildings public'spaces!which are generally histnnr i. •For tech and professional services.where their workers want to be. back of house.and kitchens are also a challenge to broadening the •Rental construction activity has been non existent given the strength attraction among a different type of restaurant. retailer. user. and of the for sale market but significant pent up demand exists • Office opportunity principally exists along Washington and will he ultimately guests strengthened by a transit connection along Washington or Collins. • Areas of the city with proximity to the beach have continually • Beyond repositioning of hotels,the configuration cif these buildings outperformed other areas in terms of pricing. MARKET INDUCED EVOLUTION creates substantial challenges as it relates to cniwersion to any other use including residential even though demand may be significant. • With the exception of constraints which exist for nearly every use. Two challenges and core components as it relates to hotel use: modern residential units would sell and/or lease very well if allowed •Testing regulatory aitpist nients that ensure the sane lily of the hislonr within the district. 1.Many of the buildings within the MXE district.particularly as it relates character of buildings in the district but also encourage reinvestment to hotel.retail and restaurants.are obsolete.They are buildings built and repositioning so that the district will attract a broader range of OFFICE MARKET OPPORTUNITY 60 70 years ago,if not longer.It is very hard,given the constraints of users/guests. the historic nature of the buildings and the sire of the rooms.to be able Similarly with office space.since 2010 2011. the city has only seen to reposition those buildings in order to accommodate modern demand. about 84.000 square feet of new office space added into the market. There has been a deficit of office space given the demand, and 2. Another not insignificant hurdle. hack in late 1990's and early notwithstanding anything that has happened in the past year in terms 2000's.the city saw a matr conversion of many buildings on the Beach of the increased rentals from the tech and financial communities,the to condo hotels and time shares.as seen in figure 3.Due to the now demand for office space still exceeds available inventory. multiple owners in many of these buildings.redevelopment of certain �Ut'I)\I'.li)N l'I A'J (Ii1 r)1 MIAMI 01 Ai STUDY AREA BOUNDARY II DRAFT ' PORT#4 -02.14.2022 • i I a • Flig Average Asking Office Square Feet(sq.ft.)Base Rent: 1Q 2012- 1Q 2021 (Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Submarket) 1 i Ulm r 11114 L 1 lit I s ; Co.) — 1 1 W t-- / Annual Net Square feet Office Absorption:Year End 1Q 2012 Year End 10 2021 a , , (Miami Dade County and Miami Beach Submarket) _afl�r I . r to ' 3 9 . Condos/Timeshare • r / Cond. _ :1 (Parcels) �, 1 123% ' ! I r . _ ■ 1 .. I _ 1 c IN of MXE District 1 ha v has multiple owners ' ; :4 11 _ , I Z per property 111 3 11♦ 1 v 167 ;I 368 _ ._.,.,.,_....„.. ---1 Figure I--- =w-- ,•, A PART II . v _ sion and Character for the DISTRICT DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 ADCD VISION PLAN PRINCIPLES The intent of these principles is to enhance the character and rebalance the district. it is about expanding and creating better and higher quality public spaces and to create a comprehensive transit and mobility plan. stw' :C x T ,, d ' .aa,` I i F'Rl �t I,RLE: REBALANCE HOSE .. e EXPAND THE PROTECT THE .: HOSPITALITY CHARACTER i 1 ` PHYSICAL INDUSTRY AND AND HISTORY 3` LANDSCAPE BY RESIDENTIAL CREATING A GREAT • ACTIVITIES PARK AND PUBLIC • s,�<I,,i t i�l,:. • WhICh nneF (teller trv,e Iurni ,Ir6,role thins • En pltir't�.?i better fond am!beverage Optn tis _ PACEI S u.. ' ro • Qut4o0111,:ii.dz.ill' • must,#irpeorne• a� 'iv. ea ..%O• : I i '�" [/ /r,` r n x t r i 'Pros.l',Ii)N PI AN (In,I)1 A1IAM I It A(H DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 a i II t: IP• , , , 1 . - ,0,.... • ' plar et 46,. 'Fit„/2-7.14/' , .,, , ‘, ,......... .. .\. ___._. •,.: : .,,,,...._ , ... ._......„ . . , .....„... ,... . .. .... ,I , CREATE A , ENHANCE THE MANAGE 403 COMPREHENSIVE 4 , 5 CHARACTER, DENSITY AND TRANSIT AND „4.... QUALITY, AND VALUE WELCOMING OF MOBILITY PLAN OF THE STREET *4'":717'' ALL PEOPLE ,. . • ', --4-1' , ACTIVITY DURING • , **ft:, ,,-,,,- : • ,Aii,k2: 4';''' TIMES OF DAY/ , 7,,,•',,:;,,,,;7„,,i.,,,,,,,,,,-24. NIGHT „:„.. . 7, , IS -• i I i N I til l.- ,-'-'! .; / lki\LI411... fi IL r, ' .,r.•;Or.T' '' ... .r 0 It .,. •,;,.„0,11111 PART III . kiowdowe get THERE? DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 0 I mg-I)\ISIUN t'I AN (II' IN MIAMI IN M'H DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 PA RT IIr HOW DO WE GET THERE? 1.RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES 28 1.1 What does it look like? .30 1.2 How does the management entity act? 32 1.3 What is the relationship to the public sector? 34 1.4 What can it look like here? 36 2.EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACES 38 2.1 Reimagining Lummus Park 39 2.2 Historical Beach Line 40 2.3 Lummus Park of the arts 42 2.4 Art Galleries&Museums in vicinity 44 2.5 Miami Beach existing special events 4i) 2.6 Site Inventory 46 2.7 Schematic Program Diagram 4 2.8 Lummus Park Concept Plan and Keys for Implementation 48 igh 3.CREATE A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN 64 3.1 Overall District 6!� 3.2 Study Corridor Summary Access 66 3.3 Miami Dade 2045 LRTP 67 3.4 Restricted Access 68 3.5 Ocean Drive Park•Pedestrian Street 70 3.6 Collins Avenue Shared Transit Street 84 3.7 Washington Avenue District Access Transit Street 9? 3.8 5th Street•Lincoln Road -Transit Plaza/Transfer Station 10(1 3.9 East/West Connection One Way Streets 124 4.ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF CORRIDORS.STREETSCAPES AND ALLEYS 138 4.1 Existing Conditions 140 4.2 Existing Conditions Good Practice 142 4.3 Approach 145 5.ZONING INCENTIVES 146 5.1 Zoning Study Area 147 5.2 Existing Zoning 150 5.3 Ocean Drive Zoning Incentives 154 5.4 Collins Avenue Zoning Incentives 178 5.5 Zoning Testing Summary 188 5.6 Zoning Considerations 189 i(I I' I I.Ill '110•1,I p 4 I I I., I, I , DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES There was a lane when urbas parks were hrnih onsulr•red yen, semis to indicate that once a Conservancy is in Success is predicated on a solid foundation of to ist the pride,toy,and responsibility of taxpayers.Once a park place,it has staying power and its charter keeps getting between the public sector, which is transferring a was in the public domain.all agreed that its weight was to renewed. significant amount of control and authority to a not for profit be carried on the shoulders of City government. organization,and the private sector actors that will invest Conservancies are private. nonprofit park benefit resources above and beyond those the public sector would No longer.While many places still hew to the traditional organizations that raise money independently of the city allocate to the park. It also depends on an appropriate model. a growing number of cities now utilize private and spend it under a plan of action mutually agreed upon parceling of responsibilities between the partners and a donations and expertise to rebuild. refurbish, maintain, with the government. Most conservancies neither own clear understanding of each stakeholders role in the new and program some of their most iconic parks. That is nor hold easements on the parkland;the land remains management of the park. A significant obstacle to the particularly true for parks in dense urban areas which find the City's, and the City retains ultimate authority over creation of a new Conservancy,particularly in a high profile themselves on the receiving end of multiple constituencies everything that happens there. Most conservancies have space.can be the sense that adopting this management and are highly utilized. been founded to restore a run-down historic park.although model is a form of condemnation of the City's past work a growing number are being created hand in hand with and its administration. Through ad hoc management structures• these their brand new green spaces. The impetus for their organizations bring together the best of private creation often comes from a combination of users and This is not the case. The Conservancy should he management methods and public sector goals to deliver nearby residents.but the political receptivity of the mayor considered an evolution of the art of park management high quality urban parks to their Cities. in many cases and city government is a de facto requirement. and a response to the ever growing list of demands made leading to the revitalization of entire neighborhoods. to public space in the modern era.Government support Typically,conservancies are created to fund large capital is essential to its success.It is true that the Conservancy TodaYs favored revitalization structure is the Parks projects such as repairs to a building.monument.fountain. model considerably modifies the mariner in which a park Conservancy.New York alone has nearly two dozen such pathway system.major lawn,forest.or lake.Many evolve will be managed.but as we said,it remains a public asset private organizations providing financial and management to oversee the actual construction and even to provide owned and controlled by the City. support for a park,and thanks to high profile successes. additional management and programming for the park.A this public private partnership approach is emerging as a few move up all the way to handling all the elements of park lummus Park is a splendid space to create such a significant park management model nationwide. In fact, administration from maintaining parkland to coordinating partnership. A Conservancy would be the ideal agent more than a hundred such structures now exist and are concessions to providing security and programming the through which the City of South Beach could create a long improving the major urban parks of areas as diverse as space. Most conservancies take on a single signature term vision for the park,improve its operations,deliver San Francisco. Pittsburg. Nashville. Dallas, Houston, park,but a few have expanded to several or even assumed engaging programming that will both benefit locals and Boston.Or Baltimore. a city wide mandate. attract noteworthy events. as well as sponsor a broad physical renovation project. all the while attracting new The concept stokes both hope and fear. Many an Conservancies generally have large hoards and small staff. private capital to the park. elected official,and many a private donor.believe that a Board size reflects the diversity of park constituencies. conservancy can improve park success while holding down bridging the worlds of the public sector, pirate sector. The first steps would be the creation of a steering committee taxpayer expense.Others are skeptical, worrying that a relevant not for profits, and sometimes important local and the negotiation of an appropriate management narrow group of residents might assume control of a public figures.as well as the need for broad financial reach.Staff agreement with the City. This would he followed by the resource with the best of intentions but without political generally focuses on outreach,fundraising.and contractor creation of the relevant 5okc131 organization and the accountability or an understanding of the broader needs management.with the very largest conservancies hiring creation of its board. of the citizenry.Nevertheless.the practice of the past forty significant numbers of maintenance and program workers. 1 rr fi 1'l'dlirl PI AN (II1 ill MIAMtl HI A(II • 11 P 1r • it if I ' ` di r f k , DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14. irIP:'i '^ate C , 1 iliv 4 i I, f I -. 4. Alai. . : , .h.lf., ' .,,, • -„ . _ ...° , • Of' . • ;tit: .ei.t.411. ./400 k.....: I -' all;. -:4"---.' '1.1011-1:---.3 :•... . ,-: '411.' t •- 4. •' ' • • v. • J' �� y .• ` . ' ' , , 40 er - -. -.. , t* I ,- ..•' A, .. , , ..it: • • ••••1 4,4rIikti ••• • 004 . . t ! • • .;4 j ��l ' a + i1 •• . 1# • .. '4.. •a % .‘ ..... 11."1114 4:4 4.. . •' • ,44 ireoli._ .. .. iiiiijoi A . t.‘ . J. A ila' i 1 . : LI:: . . • • .1 • _ . • ... . ..1 , •• , .... . . • 46 . • ' . • .. WE* 1 4141 , 2 e *IV . . „. ' llitt' •• ..... NI , ein, .. • 74 . phial/ -;1°M,, air. � }; i sv4:40 '' . }gy�pp, •:� t .. .t nr I ' liiiii . I -: iii 00,— , 11 )4 4 .4i:(i. . • • ctilli b„,400...,-44 0 t. . i . - /// I'm 1",,,1I11,,I,.:...){ \11.1•.AI ill.A((1 kr '”vo-4./ I 'fq • 62, .: W a DRAFT REPORT#4-02 14.2022 RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES 1.1 WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE? The main goal is to help the public and the private sector set Providing this complex programming is very difficult for up successful partnerships to offer high quality services to their Municipalities.and for hotels as well because they do not control Brant Park community.The idea rs to apply proven management techniques. the space.Therefore.this public y private partnership can make 7 that work in hundreds of locations in the USA.to the specifics of an enormous difference in a short amount of time and with Miami Beach.It is about transforming public spaces into people limited capital. timidly destinations by unifying the approach to landscaping. maintenance. sanitation, security, programming, design, and A successful example of a transition from a city managed BEFORE AFTER retail leasing to produce an environment pleasing to all. park to a Conservancy is Bryant Park.which is considered as City Management Conservancy one of the best managed parks in America. The Bryant Park g Miami Beach is coming from a position of incredible strength in conservancy had an important numerical impact over the course Direct Jobs 2 120 terms of the value of the real estate market and the brand name of 30 years: direct lobs attributed to Bryant Park increased of South Beach in general.and the fact that this city has one of from 2 city employees to 120 private sector lobs:the annual the most beautiful beaches in the world.The intent is to shape operating budget increased bya factor of 100from$250.000 to Annual Budget $250,000 $25,000,000 an iconic neighborhood into a cultural district. S25.000.000:100'x•taxpayer funding of the Park was reduced . to zero taxpayer funding:annual visitors rose from 200.000 to Percentage paid from 100% 0% In order to make people feel welcome.safe.and comfortable 8 million per year:and the conservancy reduced the incidence t when there's a very dense crowd,it is critical to offer services of serious crimes reported from 1.000 per year to zero. This Taxpayer that make people feel that the space is protected.clean,and new park management approach has also had an impact on beautiful.Cities often times struggle to do that.and what many the neighborhood as a whole. with new redevelopments and Visitors per Year 200,000 8 million cities have done,increasingly and successfully,is add a layer businesses and how it has participated in a broader renewal of of management that will bring the best of competencies and the community. Serious Crimes per 1,000 0 talents that intertwines the work of the private sector with the Year public sector. This is the potential these organizations can have as a catalyst for change and for improvements. It is not lust about building very large scale events that are going to draw thousands of people to the neighborhood.Miami Beach BEFORE-City Management AFTER-Conservancy already has very strong centers of attraction with many events fi already happening in this area.It is also about developing a level a M qf �_ of activities at the ground level.for locals and the population that 111 I • i work and live in the neighborhood,in such a way that there's ,• 3�' r =R " ' a sense of ownership of the street,the park and public spaces I A ! ( that invites a relationship of respect between the visitors and A jr,�•++•� the locals and makes it a much more interesting and layered 1' i it '- • • • • • ,i experience for the people who come here. , 1 ..." -b�;i' j yob I, •+ • �R i 1L-kip I. ��� cllW ..� A y ' • — • or —" Y e 1 \..._v `A r / l I .A1x'.I i N.1';ItiN PI AN.l lly ill MIAMI IT At 1l , 11; (*. : 1 s , 42._ *, * r-' ,,,, -‘" i, ;I:,,,1' , - . , rAr_. . • 1 1 11 $ - . ... ty'., ' .0 ' . A' I • • .. • ' . IPA . *., t A:1 " . .4 142 '''''''.r'''''''t I ., '...0 , 1 / • , k *, 4' :P ' ...*• ' .4 .. . ‘./ lrf p'l '-. • ' ' , 41 • A ' r . • 4 o' ' . 1 ' i . ,-(7,,C 4'.. ',. ' '1;', ..ell•'' ' 4 '' \''' ^. r c4 A.' 7- i ' ' 1 f,i ,• .i. . ...xv.; -4-Tr.:- °N: • ''r fo .. .....4: ,.,,t.... ,000 r 4,7 Llatity ... 1111 . ., ,... 4- fla ; • *' It' • Go 3.17 ;.'..,,,' tell 'i • "/ rcg I ' 1 t, . 0(... ,,:.. - ''I 11 kf i)°11• 4 of , A .,-..,. ,, 4,s,. . . _ Multiple Activities & ' IA'tt,Ist. a i if ,/-- i , , Safe, Orderly .,. Diverse Audiences ".... .4.54 , -e--.. i Branding & ---41 Behavior , .r - ..,- , f • •••• ' . 1.•••• A , ... . e4 / ' . Placemaking f , #',;• ,. . tk- %,"- ' •••74'. . , ' r ' -- .r, ' A OP* •,... -- • . • t A ' .ie , tefrt"t1p. ,1 i As ' , , , . IP, • ill 4- oil; 1111•.•....0....11 + lot 14. 1 0 ii . ii , 1 d ,, r . , , ,, . .... L., ..,,..„ . , , ,.. ._. ,i 4 i " ' -• , . . r. e.g. \i; : c,_ . V ,, 1 . at• trIew a . - 1 t . I A, • . i rt or- '.t. i i ,4411C ' •a . v '1 . L , , j 1 fr ' it''''''''. I- .44 -- ' . .„ • - . . , .. A h„.,,, "•4 41tIsIV , 1 if ...,,,4 . . _ ......... r , _ , t:, • . .... 4 ..1 5 ell : • w4, ' '4r7 ' '' / ''''i ' r :C.:...tt I" A• i. .., J '''' : 1 11446-. *PIN. .1. i ... ri ...., Plants & Horticulture -..." .: ' IP 4 - -7 . 10 • ,c`zi • ' '''Alig ri i , I A.,. . . -• • •' e .. . *Art•c.. - • _ 144 I e•—•-• - •" - • ‘• 1 he .• , ,_ ... , . .., ,...2.,,, 4„,'17.2- A - r — 7•...... +mop, ' 4 i , ' im?---- ="2 ----- - -...••• . . . ....... r . , ."•••"`"-,......"'I'' A. —Jr • •••guy -.. 3,, ••• ..• f••• . ..''. -..:1. \„•;1111111 ....211? 01...* .4%6 • 1r- 1111:- Ni----. •. _ —_,...t 111. •••... 4. oaf .mq LAW 144,4. 0 .......-- - 1.1 ill •Aidow '4401 i& , , 446 • .,, a, - -MOS .11. .....04/1. • OA ha% Well-Maintained ....„ .... mow 14 ism r,f Infrastructure Clean & -,... Individuals Who 0 4-risillt " ."10111.11 Litter-Free t Ape- Feel Ownership IP .420: - • • , ‘ DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES 1.2 HOW DOES THE ENTITY ACT? ,i{lift, lit t1`, Pi OW(Ali Sf.i vii , t XA r Pi t lilt ,lt . ill I)"str •Daily presence CITY MANAGEMENT Besides Bryant Park,other geographical examples where a sucressfill model of cnnservanry Understand normal conditions and behaviors has happened are: 11 Empty street trash cans Mon/Wed/Fri at San, •Respond to immediate conditions Canalside in Buffalo in Northern New York State.!Of Merl in a dismvested area.is a great Not tied to a business plan or schedule CONSERVANCY example of how a waterfront park following this model of management and with very limited Learn what needs to get done over time capital investment to begin with,managed to become a magnet for visitations.development I Empty street trash cans throughout every day. and a new identity for the city. •Hyper local with additional staff during peak hours. Different tactics block to Mock Another model is the 3CDC organisation in Cincinnati.which trecame a bridge between Can move between public and private boundary 2)Observe trash along curb at 8am private and public sector and took it as its omission to do froth public space management hilt Remove trash at Sam. also redevelopment of undervalued properties such as vacant Moldings that hail cultural •Communicative value,development of affordable housing and coning changes,and over a period of 20 years Direct communication with stakeholders 31 Observe graffiti on light pole at 8am. of increasing responsibilities.built up the entire downtown to great success. Remove graffiti before end of day. r 1ia ... r , . Ajillik. Ira i t. • • or • ; ,. r i►• f • • - • . r t i �• s Or li 0 ', 1 tit':, 4, , 1 01 . ..N,„/ . _,. . .... ... ....-- • .. • it .. i II II ' #f4P . ,f°i 1, --",‘440 I CAI irl)VISION PI AN.(11 Y ill MIAMI RI ACH BRYANT _ � . P . — CANALSIDE ,, 3r.,...',D . __ .„ --� �., , „... .. _ • ., ..„ ,�, - . .- 1 p 'Ilk r : MI 1111 1.� 11) L ! \ '... % ' \Il't p i ,N, .__ . .,.,,,,.....r.,,, .:.. ft• re• _\ • r• �T •r ''• 4,1116• Alr.441\first , oirlk t .? ei( - est ,..........11. ,,,,iiist i`. • �,, r�� BEFORE-City MsnsgsnwM AFTER-Cans*rwn @p r .{4 //l14 , - • Jrr _ ~ C ell- - -, - t. i'it - . ': . ...: '11 , ., , :- i .,........,. ... ....... • ., ., N.- ' Apt/Tr ',' .yy.ii��� �"'+ ,:�• v .. �"�s4if • •Jai' 7 c��'tt �+ • .•, iit �� en '! r � .:10011 d ` ' ' 14 "� ' Vy , lummlemenionw _ .a .v - s, .9/14.'a r 414P.. R,...._ 40, DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES 1.3 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR? The Conservancy is seen as a true partnership between Public sector manages relationships instead of Services. • !lamination exchange&optimization of processes public and private sector.which bridges the two to bring the best practices of both. the public service mission, ideals. •Overall strategy and orientation What are the key elements', and oblectives of the public sector with the procurement •Alignment with city policies technique and fast decision making of the private sector. •Legitimacy in eyes of public •Defined district boundaries •Capital financing and start up costs •Private funding(value capture) Take, for example. two basic services such as sanitation •Board presence and longterm accountability •Diverse board composition and security. On the sanitation front, the public private •Search(audits...)and Rescue(if necessary) •Approval and oversight by the City partnership in this community improvement district will set •Right balance of competencies transfer •Independent day to day management and finances policies that allow public facing operations to be done by a private sector partner,while the City focuses on large scale Management entity applies private sector methods with operations, public purpose: On the security front. the organizations will make safety •Ownership mindset:Discipline&flexible timing in execution ambassadors the first level of interaction with the public •Multi year budget and fund retention which monitor behavior,inform the public expectations.and •Even levels of service countercyclical provide first grade interventions with reliable support from •Control over staff&no legacy of labor negotiations city services,with the police intervening when needed.It is a • Market based pricing,flexibility of staffing&best price to pyramid way of organizing the services that allows the police quality ratio procurement A� to be more strategic and effective in keeping an eye on the •Hyper local knowledge.bridging different worlds 7 neighborhood. •Protect controls&resource optimization W •Ability to experiment It is about creating a management entity empowered to •Clear responsibilities(metrics! make decisions. •Public strategy&communication Geneses Story • It. if Politicians who s't lead change it.. �.y MANAGEMENT ENTITY Nit • Engaged A 11 ,r,r . r �I% �t. t / -F¢- private sector Innovators in f °' stakeholders public service F r pr' (with resources :Hb. _..,rlG • &legitimacy) PRIVATE OWNERS PUBLIC SECTOR At WI)VI;INN PI AN.(.I t'i ill MIAMI PI A('H DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 ci 11Pi_t . Sanitat►ou 1fth S ' v 4i11,'a =.,It ' , ft,,,: Management entity conducts public facing operations.Quick to respond. Safety ambassadors monitor behavior.inform the public about egwctations City focuses on large scale operations. and provide first grade interventions.Police step in WI, r''' '-.. I 'tt dr' 111 , ' ' rr �. ' ice. '. •+ , b^ Ala i II )Vrei" . iiiiikt ' 1•"-t,^ '" licir ,.. 1111Ww. 1 /1,1 il I -oat . wA � ..,� e. i t i J•Xillk-----". * • . ft. • _'' IP: 4 Filli': I ..,. .119: ,; ,' to .<'. r • Air - y . j v . ••Na "0:-.\ oqi i„,,,,„4.,;44 ._ - PARK , ANN ,, - 2 . , i + �. -. 1,*,f ` 61, _• 6As3-A`4 ..,. •. DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACES 1.4 WHA1 CAN IT LOOK LIKE HERE? There is an opportunity to act on a broader district wide scale, with the right kind of funding and broader mandate from the city to make improvements with a looser set of restrictions to conduct flexible operations.The City needs to capitalize on Lummus Park. which is an exceptional space that if it were actively managed by an entity. with the day to day decision making capacity concerning what occurs in this area.could very quickly become an even stronger magnet for the neighborhood and also be very siiccessful for the District. There are many ways of doing it.but our thinking is that this may need to be a graduated approach. A future reimagined Lummus Park and Ocean Drive would function much better if there is a strong and independent Conservancy group that is the leader on the protect which would function as the initial stage of management and from there it can he expanded into Collins 0 Avenue.Washington Avenue,East West streets.and alleys in a 0 later stage. ��...�� Create and manage systems to respond to: } � ll . A x• .r 1 # •Delivery logistics 1 1 •ir0 •Guest and tourism experiences • ' A •Programming and event management •Park and street life programming (1 •Neighborhood signage and marketing • - • Itt. •Hotel bookings �_ 0 I • • �z 'X • owrw oo Marti► i AI if 0 vlGiiN PI AN (I I1 ill MIAMI III Al ii I5 53 y o 2 5 a , s:'iA••D -I S s m " m " o a d � I � 3 i w 0, 1 a, s 3I - - . o I' I w 1 rJ I I 0 I 0.— 0 • •• iijr / •-i6 I / I �IV! - W / O O / NV3)O / Ni )I1Nd11V . I ci: J N1, ii°I I r , o I J )aVd At I I O9NIWV1H m 0 I ` _ 1 -4 I I t i ' I I 5• N 2--• I A 0I iv 1 `OM �� � � � N N / 1 i . / 1 4 1 I / 1 1 1 I I 1 1 ii -• / L • r i 1 I , 1 Om L . ip---=---• • i I AavaNnos `i 38v Aanis 1 , Im/ . D( i 1 2l fAiI 'Alj "j I Z I I'. 47 °i A y h 1 M/ a 1 n/ i ,,,,. / 1 t DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACES Since the early 1900's Lummus Park has been an integral part To address some of the issues described.this concept proposes of South Beach.serving as the space that mediates the relation improvements that focus on the following main concepts: between the City and the Atlantic Ocean.Its spatial conditions have varied throughout time,as a reaction to the City's growth. 1.Improve the City's connection with the Park and the ocean. changes in land use,and environmental events. 2.Increase resiliency and enhance ecosystems. In its early days.the park provided a smooth transition from the City to the Ocean through a shaded space under Coconut Palms. 3.Improve north to south connectivity. This grove of Coconut Palms allowed visitors to enjoy ocean views and shelter from the sun while being on the Beach.After the 4.Activate and refine park programming. mid 80's implementation of the dune levee,and the continuous expansion of the beach to the east.the park's direct relation to This proposal intends to bring nature into the city by integrating CM the Ocean became distant and interrupted by a physical barrier the beach and dune into the park as a resilient landscape space. that blocks views and makes access more challenging.The Park Under the premise of connectivity, the park will increase its now only faces the City.which in turn now has different needs. transparency and will allow users to see and be seen as part and serves a larger number or users. The groves of Coconut of the historic character of Ocean Drive.Access to the park will Palms now seem obsolete,now only paying tribute to past days be facilitated and more program opportunities will activate areas where the vocation of the space functionally and visually bridged otherwise unused. the City to the sea. The diagram in figure 4.shows in dark green about 15 acres of The Park currently hosts an extensive program that is mainly green space between Ocean Drive and the serpentine wall,and concentrated West of the historic coral stone wall.Except for the then the hard pack sand is also approximately 15 acres in area Muscle Beach area and volleyball courts,the interstitial space between the serpentine wall and the dune. between the wall and the dune sits unoccupied and underutilized most of the time.This forgotten space.besides representing a The Atlantic Ocean used to he about 50 feel away from the coral barrier to access the beach,also presents itself as the largest rock wall.Lummus Park has not changed much since the beach opportunity for the park to grow.accommodate new uses.and renourrshmenl protect.which is one of the most successful in resolve issues that have evolved though time.One of these issues the entire country.There is an opportunity to take advantage Is related to the increase of traffic along Ocean Drive.which acts of Lummus Park.which is an exceptional space but currently as a physical barrier and prevents the integration of the City and underutilized.and use it as the basis for doubling its size to Park.The next barrier preventing East to West connection is the facilitate other programming opportunities such as recreation. length of the lawn/coconut grove areas. which funnel visitors arts and culture as well as support space for the City functions. through 12 walkways designed for smaller crowds than what the area regularly receives. vIOt li v ltiltml It,Sr lit r)I MIAMI il'ilt DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 �1 2.1 REIMAGINING LUMMUS PARK �, _i► w _ Yv , z % ``+ 4410b ' "*a4, Acres 14 ' , N. ,• ' --• 4,_ ,y 411 . s • •. ft_ .fir ,. • .yli: i • '4164, • lir . ' I ''.• .74P6% ...' •' \''''',6_."" 11%,-.:+b' ---•.., 101 ' '� a Acres ti 1, N. • `15r IlL - , tt :11 ' ' NP'Nt. 4i ' 4,‘. , , , _ , , �t . t . , NI? ariplp., ..,,,- ,. ss.".„ ,, ./.:4 -,71 iiN .... , .r. -.1" 29 . 7 5 A � r • TOTAL . r► • '�T • 41 • IC" � . � \ �� s �''' a, •�. �'qll 1110.00 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACES 2.2 HISTORICAL BEACH LINE + FLOOD ZONE of 1 i 1 3 'y( `� •A•.:iMr- •. ... .APM MIAM1 MACM.PLOM10A / 1 :.r • k 14 M Ai= • ! "'1: • 1� Jr_• , 1 ! - -' r I , STUDY AREA BOUNDARY •)�I -4 „,. : I CRA Na4 e .,_ �.. : 1 f 'It' i 1 / •� 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 t" - 1 Irg1 I 1 1 I -Ai t 1 1 • AE 1 XI I * ,'-•� Y 1 1 1 , 1 i I ! 1 1 ...I (11 ——J 1 M` 1 1 1 1 1 "�, . , 1 1950'S I UMMUS PARK . REACH .—, AE I VE 1 .. V kwf• 11V \ ., r. . - Mp �, •ram-� • .......J + iF-i F. visa-+w 174: _a 1:1'''iL 1 -� R .. •J I; ! — : : ., 1 -• ,w�pp Via_•.r 1 � a.i n/M : :: / Ai was 1" / �. `p . I , T.' te"'" / r PRESENT LUMMUS PARK +HIA(.l+ DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 n , A • 4. ..„,,, r 4. . • III 41 �• "' a- am`' � ice.. I i.. .4. a. 1\ •, ), . . - •_`tea. - .1' s•.r.......l.A..l.,P i' _ - prig . Win' _` i- 0 •1^ ® �` l 't:' • . 0• 5�,� �fi.,R HIV•�1"'-P��""� �+'�T ♦ • ' r t �• ' �'".i'*.c . DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACES 2.3 LUMMUS PARR Of 1 HE_ ARTS Naoshima is an island town in Japans Seto Inland Sea. The The City of Miami Beach is working on this already, with an island is best known for its many contemporary art installations underwater sculpture park right off Lummus Park. This is an and museums.Designed by Tadao Ando as a destination for art. example on how the use of the underwater. the beach, the the buildings are there to support hotels.hut the area is all about buildings,and the park,can create an incredible destination. design and spaces that startle.This is an example on how art can be integrated into Lummus Park and bring an entire community of people from around the world to extend Art Basel into a year round activity.and build in visual and performing arts. Lummus- Park of the arts Build on Art Basel Spaces that startle CD Naoshim . I . j) a + r• 0,00,.. ... .- At% .......:.:: .Y.. -.14:: • f + W. , W. liMENIOI • • NO All 0 PR - • -- - nl rtli Vl'eiiN PI AY 1111i)I MIAMi 141 ACII I«' \\'iildltnk DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 MIAMI BEACH IS WORKING ON THIS ALREADY .1n Otllci•«V00i•1d1'' uilcicr«'atci. 4., ,- Sculhturc 1)a1•1: NV ill Uh('ll in �Iiai»i 4 • • V1 '}�`� «►. �� ��* ter - ,..001"' -11"1°111111" . - -4.1"41.7..1..: --"--"1".."111111411F- P s s tears ,p . 0110. 110.14NO' • 0 w ,.... .. �. - - t. -.,,- - -r .. -►III I ll,.. . � \ "`R" , , --141!". .� ..'i7.• '' ,"'fir _"IX- 'i •* �- Sr• .1Ik .- • '.'1144,1(144' • •. i•.*,.Aokirir . DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS N 2.4 ART GALLERIES& MUSEUMS IN VICINITY O c As seen in figure 5. Lummus Park presents an incredible ' •_ _ i opportunity to be explored as a park of the arts that sits in the :_� ,, �i ,,• :•.I 4 middle of all of the existing cultural arts institutions within the •, t�•�s -. 4.r area.and it is in the best possible location.right in front of the - _• v R � f ocean. , ' .• - , „. fit t., ...gym 't►:. • "„ _ i '� d4 ' vier- 1 ::.......00 .,,,, .. 1 A `� _ .• S.- a• +1- it - • „l o island Aol MOO .r o • , Il #_�.yt_�r.+ h1- C^ Beli I a " I e0 I 4 01411 I ri . ,411, _,,.., ..... test ,.. . 0, ..r. yn1 • rok 4111..12.tei:1, A!' lir••••.i ::11111 • 4 t‘i,*It•• .i.i$ 1 / tr • •ilia c_.,ir slantl r 4 f +R �� .,rim tiDe ...- 711 •S 7 — fic,...1-i...4 -, 4.,,. , 1 ,,,,. in 1 1 . Lt. AP' . ! r4 ! ill X - :�f • _ ..,_ , ,1if 0 1 Vi i ... ..........ert ,, "T A ill. ",. 4 ... -' . 1 4 ili si i .-,,4',..,. i .,1,l1 'iG5IN PI AN (IIA 1)1 MIAMI IP DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 2.5 MIAMI BEACH EXISTING SPECIAL EVENTS Capital One Orange Bowl South Beach Wine and Food National Salute to America's Heroes stow,'Apra BOUNDARY December 2018 Festival.February 2019 May 2019 I & 1 j r( ; ,oa..a...ow... 7 t... 1 I ! I 1 / / I r I/ + I 1 $11 . .J 1 , I 1 I 1 • / . , ; .-.. / 1 i 1 r f 1 --r r I - I ! 9 I 10 ' t•.. I 1 t 7 / . : / -f r. :: I .. 1 I i_-- l f ,-- 1 - I CTI . . l • I 1 1 I • _ t 1j ; 0 "1 I f I ,- 1 1 I / I . r Art Basel fix Untitled Art Show Fox Box Super Bowl j { December 2019 December 2019 January.February 2020 - 1 1-- I 'I i .I r ; ! / i I I I I 1 i / i i I i I i I _ i i / ;'--I I r +---I i j 1 I I lI ..l I 1 I I ..l ...-. I ... 1 I 1 ,..jf.-,,/ 1 }1..1 7 1 1 .. l 1 . I ei , • : / . ti j, it- j }} 77J 1 ! 1 ! 1 I I • I I / E I , l 7 1 t..-:.' • 1 t.1 1 / 1 i ' / I I / 1 1 1 11• - f(jfJ I r—I j-.I 1 j , i7 f i , f 7! r ' Il i 1 1 J --... ( i IJ 1-::I I I L:_:f I i a LI,1 l'ARI 111(11 11'.,)I A11>A',1r I:I 'III , ,,II 1 4S DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS N 2.6 SITE INVENTORY Figure 6 shows the beach in yellow. dark orange represents mil"sir ,y" *t .: ` the existing dunes.and Lummus Park is divided between light ' — I ,. .• 1.1„ at • orange and green.The intention is that every street in the district 1' _ ,,,,, «'. ' could end on something special where it terminates at the new °"•'t - .+ "t, w,' {k conceptualized park.such as sculptures or an exhibition. $, ^e'•m .a >,f r • • - There is an opportunity to use 10th Street as a mid point and . - a°; ,,� -. t t r . �J,, ►fiU Il rlrllalli to think of the northern area of the park as being more family - ••' COI ,.�.,,.. '• 'y"fi=• - ...: - -- •t t. I oriented with children's activities.and the south end more civic ,It+. - and entertainment. • ,:� t t� j, o',' •ngBeach < r g Dune , Man Circulation ,. ,., iA Bag Green Space < � ,�, ,�.^ «< Imo' ,. `'� - r •+., ypderutltl:ed space , , 4 . ..: -- $ III »if o ltlsnng swctnres _ ".. ., ..,... r . , 1:,: :'basting Promenade&wall r , (T! l a ,. '. i 1 Si ExlsUng Nodes _.. ailig O 'li,6 i Hdseng Vehicular Circulation - jt'""'R "�._u ..,:.., _ ..._,...._.. _ ... ....,... - i� t .� , it Figure 6 ..`<i` ri''' llf South:Civic Oriented North:Nature and Family Oriented " �I • N rfil , LEGEND 1 , Beach Access/Street Plazas Sidewalk ,i� k l M 1 Main Park Circulation Pedestrian+Bicycle Beachwalk-Native Trail - �� •� ' _._ Ocean Drive Secondary Circulation I AI CI)VISION PI AN.(I l t ill MIAMI III A(li DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 2.7 SCHEMATIC PROGRAM DIAGRAM ,) Programmable Programmable Beach Access Lawn w/Coconuts Catwalk Space Major Circulation Volleyball Courts Space Proposed Playground Beach Dune Existing Wall Beach Walk Visitor Center Muscle Beach y Ocean Drive N • .. ... ltirrrrnrrrN ►rrrrrrirrriur`� , ,, lipp . .. . . , :.. • . . . "., _ .. , - "' • . --. . r.rrrrrrrrrrrrrmrmrrr àuiiT!rf! ,,,,.x ,? _it., ...a q riiirrit - i ' •.„ ,:__, IIIII1 Eiii j:un t_1 7 R x Hila_L---7 - i /111711 ; ' ' ''' Z y ,‘ .. ,,,,, ..__ C 1 !! llljlll l __ Cl l ___,„ ___ I t ' ' , . /1-72uoi-7-iiiiii--- r -.. „ _- -- Ill F----,11 _____ . , , 1!Tr__ - ��� tl____., RIIII,i_ir— . El -T- 1 f-1 I I_I 1 r- ,— --i ., 'Iraiill T-r--__ 1111 1:--1[--- - __. _ _ r_________ CT i f LEGEND Beach Dune -Lawn With Coconuts ' Major Circulation .Existing Wall - Event Space 1111111 Ocean Drive it a M t Beach Walk — Serpentine Wall 11111 Lawn With Coconuts .Structures 11111 Ocean Drive III Beachwalk . Programmable Space Pedestrian Path Beach Access DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS 2.8 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPT PLAN AND KEYS FOR IMPLEMENTATION The proposed vision is that Lummus Park starts at the edge of the public by increasing dune vegetation. , the building facades and that it should be one integrated park That the hotel looks out over and that allot the different activities rt. Provide more planting areas that promote stormwater happen within the park. infiltration and/or capture, FP 411/ It is important to note that all Lummus Park drawings shown in 3.Improve north to south connectivity. ! M this document represent a vision and landscape design concept ' +e* j " only and are not intended as final designs. a.Provide a continuous beach walk along the West side of the ,i > it\ilit dune that will meander through diverse spaces.The beach walk ` a �.) to address some of the issues previously described.this concept will transition to a nature centric path. b a ,., " proposes improvements that focus on the following main 1� concepts: b.Provide improvements of the existing Lummus Park circulation r . b i .. ?I including signalization, program, and accessibility. Expand �'' y f l 1.Improve the City's connection with the Park and the walkways into open plazas at every street end. ' si I i , '',,,,„k: . ocean. o c. Widen sidewalks along Ocean Drive to allow for outdoor If:. '` 1 w 't ir,. a. Improve park's East to West connectivity by increasing the promenading.seating.and planting areas that will also ensure .- :a •"R \"'$ z: py park'access intothe permeability i the Ocean Drive sideopeningmid-block pedestrian safety and proper flows. £ by - �. ..mg Cr) 4.Activate and refine park programming. , , j i - _ N h.Improve access from the West by consolidating street ends as aE� r • • ;, urban plazas and widening Ocean Drive West sidewalks. a.Improve Lummus Park s program offerings by including diverse ra 45 0. .+ a ,. . program opportunities. The south end remains more active in ri � ,+ �"`. " ,114111111040 r7:. c. Design and integrate alternative transportation systems. nature.whereas the center portion becomes a civic center The ,,,�.o ,� r including potential transit station on 5th street.ridesharing drop north end is quieter and relates more to nature.The proposedR 's j off areas along Ocean Drive.rental e bikes and charging stations. programming is complemented with new amenities. -"' d.Create a topographic path West of the dune levee to introduce h. Introduce art and nature as the overarching themes. The program opportunities with ocean views. landscape and hardscape design invite opportunities and spaces x , for art installations along the park.From formal display spaces to vv.. e.Limit the amount of beach access points to reduce habitat impromptu performances to the essence of the landscape design fragmentation_ itself.the user will face an ever changingexperience dependent on the park visitor's chosen route. 2.Increase resiliency and enhance ecosystems. c.Extend 5th.Bth.10th.12th and 14th streets into the park as a Create a new beach walk West of the dune levee to increase plazas.These areas will also serve as beach access points. and restore the dune vegetation. and associated ecosystems and also provide additional area for bike/ped at the current dune d.Preserve the parks legacy and history by using the rock wall as elevation while providing both views to the ocean and views of the the main circulation route and structural back bone.The iconic historic hotels. Coconut Palms and lawn areas will be scaled to give way to native dune planting and improved park access. 7 h. Improve and increase storm surge protection with the creation of a new beach walk West of the dune levee. e Implement shade structures and viewing platforms West of the dune levee to provide space for shaded activities and 360 degree c.Increase biodiversity and provide educational opportunities to views to ocean and city. .4 I Al WIi'di';I()N+PI AN I Itt iif MIAMI lit A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 y� , ,4. , „ .: . . i AP t' , .: 1 ct: ,„ " , '''' 4 4 It I 4 il e'Imo" . A, rlt)416 .., .. .„ kw* 4,,,,.,.,._., . •r' 144 i '�i I flig 4 0---:1 7. -• '.1*-PAird-Olf -..1. d" 1 I I I I I I, cc Ix w I- I E u1$ y' 'I' W v , L 11 s III DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS 2.8.1 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTUAL SECTIONS There is almost 400 feet between the edge of the building and vision plan.as seen in the lower section,aims for Lummus Park the dunes. this is a tremendous amount of open space that to start at the edge of the building facades integrating the entire should be better utilized.Conceptually we can see in the below area as the park. diagrams.the existing conditions in the top section.which has an urban edge.Lummus Park.a multipurpose area that is mostly underutilized. the dunes. and then the beach. The proposed IW toWIJ W,J W Z z �IQ (9 Q Z J J W,3 w;3 3 i—w Fp-IW �w 41 CCd Cl 2iz `Liz z o z z,w Z:W o ��a 2 d ¢'a V /) 2 X �IW H.W Z W y,V) ln,V, O W,Iy. Q La. 4) .......... (7 LU i 0 0 Z W Q w ix 41 11 I } t m ¢ FL 13.00.. wQ OCEAN DRIVE WMMUS PARK Amin MULTIPURPOSE AREA EMI Existing w z o I o U 4/ 380' •z o - IN O �� >, ' r . F w 401,04 it LUMMUS PARK BEACH Proposed I AIH I)VISION I I AN,CITY Ill MIAMI Ill Al II DRAFT REPORT#4 —02,14.2022 2.8.2 OCEAN DRIVE AND LUMMUS PARK INITIAL CONCEPTS J_ ' /•.: 4'* :fit %% �« . • ` '14 . I at I Its.0 •• ms'-''` 1 CJ1 , r • ,.r► ` w` ` 4 .If w <' . . )11. ' ,; • 40)11 t t . ..., . .„........w........ . IOW :',;,.,.. ''.„, e' •�,.,._ a. . li . 4 I.;;' r . _ : It: *it,, ; r • r -Irr a a . ':. I - .., • '''''6 ' - ''''''' '. ,. . .. .. .. _ ,,,,. ..,. •►S`. is t . ey lv e►'' ,, . ...., .. .„ . , .,„, ,, ... ,.. i.' 1 1 ',II. 1 '1,,'11 P FSY?YSCOVICH 1 51 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS 2.8.3 LUMMUS PARR SOUTH ez , '1 ' . ink lit- •cean Drive x m++.... �` Y . j 4 Jli :‘--4 is 3 a w: , an Dnv: il* 'A VOMMIlblato 10 ik• � � ,rr - . r / ,, �. +Xi j 'i /sr aist4 i M , T r . a it, r 8_. , , ,,, 4t. '' ''‘. ' ,t„ ., I AP* T r y, w r , -, eeg' . ,}_I woi R , v, a . a Ma P 2 , I terry ti., I ift WOW I_EGENO 1 1.Cul-de-sac Turn-Around 1 2.Beach Access III Dense Native Planting 1 IN Coconut Groves 3.Playground 1111 Dune Planting 4.Native Vegetation Permeable Paving 1 5.Pavilions Play Surface I 6.Volleyball/Large Events •Sand I 7.Muscle Beach IIIWater Feature 1 8.Boardwalk ' 9.Native Dune I 10.Maintenance/Storage I 11.Outdoor Dining o I 12.Street-end Plazas C I 13.Coconut Palm Groves ^_, I ADCD VISION PLAN,CITY Or MIAMI BEACH L9 2 BUILDINGS F ff • ` DINING AREA +mac ) ,.4e r „it OCEAN DRIVE _ or. I-..' 7 '1► SIDEWALK •' 44 �.i r 1 __ PROMENADE IF J p N T it 4 t,' ENT&SPORTS AREA r ,I t. ' i. 1' j '``{. o X .1 BEACHWALK PATH x, ,c `Ir - 'n ,rr -n t ',L VI4. • . , — �'- -1 r• 1.1•L • " - �� _ o '. L rjllo �•t. ` .` it EXISTING DUNE \' � _ \. ...., a .T `.1J<a' - o p N O N N >w . ,. L_) r /it BEACH L_) . ` > ' '4• ♦ 0 DRAFT REPORT #4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS 2.8.4 LUMMUS PARK CENTER 1 it 0-; , r .or i...4::) 1 , I' L y • r .11. Tl . ,' hf \' . .0. rM,,/t ..�` 4 ear w *t iks. �" f 4 1.1 mr .4 opt -+�n�OAP - y. Oc! n D�rlvc '--�,,,�,� fi '•E.a . 4.. , 1 J i 4. T `� � 4 , ,.4 , '' LI „mg, I;, lit elk d J t 0,,,, , k ‘4, , ; - .•IR ; . i ,,,.::10 1 )• yf i1 , irk ,44s:-..,,r;:-, lit: IF - ..______ d,11,..- • ,-.„12fillhi .7.....i.4 -3 4;4,4. 411r-ir n- or , - -- —_ _- -,----- -- . ., -,.- \suit,a.,,a__,.. #11 vi.zzintro2k_.„...___ , • ry 11 ins tt 1 LEGEND I 1 1.Boardwalk 15.Open Space/Stage Area a Dense Native Planting I 2.Topographic Trail Natural Amphitheater 16.Relocated Lifeguard Headquarters ii Coconut Groves , 3.Landscape Pocket-Art Moments 17.Not-for-profit Organization •Dune Planting , 4.Ocean Lookout IIIPermeable Paving I 5.Overlook Structures-Stage Play Surface I 6.Open Air Plaza II Sand 7.Existing Lifeguard Headquarters/Exhibition WatIIIer Feature I I 8.Coconut Palm Groves 9.Elevated Catwalk 10.Beach Access r I 11.Native Dune o o I 12.Playground Splashpad i I 13.Street-end Plazas v, I 14.Outdoor Dining 1 I ADC()VISION PLAN.CItY 01 MIAMI BEACH DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 SITE SECTION 3 Z Ui �n Li Q Q 0 z 0 Z QUQ .,..p.i.,,, ,:.: ,,, 0 ¢ 3 Z Z Z w coW -J z z o 2 3 m z u� in o ¢ a z o p as > W X a D w Z 0 h H ly 144, W..,,;, W .. r .' VIPE%FI''._74... 4 `14 II4, 4010M.. 3' i - - , f..7.\ ...„7.1...„.. .. . . raw, . P . .. .1 r , : to _ ,401, +d �1��� y , .,,, .,-"CI..til4;0141;:, -.**:',' a.. '''''''''''' „. .. . , , „.,.. . .7,, , , . pat'1 o•- Llt-":.- • j I .- a;t11‘ " ' , r � r Cl) w Y Cl) w w Y wr .-,[p �f, H, ,._• Z ¢ o ¢ o a a a ¢ 0 3 a o W Z I-- 0 m Qz U z 5 Z W w o a W cc F- a 0 cc a to R w w f. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS O 2.8.5 LUMMUS PARK NORTH z . to , ',. if+ 1 V 1 Flynt az...:i i. ...„ r •foi:1!7. • 1 / =,IMn �( ,or 1 _tiirilif 4. .....--""---'. 1 1 ii? WM itoiti ti .� iv",")..1,14. ik ., : . ..- . . r ;1/7 • 4-- • ,••-•T • -$4 . • f l } . , , y� ��r a r ., ' „ \t'Vr----- . ;OP . A I LLVLND I 1.Boardwalk Dense Native Planting I 2.Topographic Trail S Coconut Groves I 3.Landscape Pocket-Art Moments 5 Dune Planting I 4.Beach Access 111 Permeable Paving 1 5.Playground.Splash Pad } Play Surface w 14 6.Coconut Palm Groves 1 Sagd 7.Dog Park Water Feature i I z 8.Hammock Area 9.Street-end Plazas II f 10.Outdoor Dining ., ( ADC:D VISION PLAN.(.ITN 01 MIAMI 131 MO DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 SITE SECTION 4 • i ` • rc, a • <.• 6 4,4 1llik e _ `h_.. L--- 44- , ...-te EtWi..-..;, _ ,0 irk,......... ... 11 ' _ T `. -a."'L mow_• - _ _ A' .�..... E'..1 .y1 r VI A:i .. . . kg , , . , vra;.— . ..i 4 - •ii 1 •ii % .. -.1 ' ' 10.„ ipsio, -.,,4 • Au. •s j - r T ' '..-,,eft.., T A r cn 0W > ,J Cc 0 K f Z Z CC a a Q a Z a a p W 15 Z W la 0z CO CD Z N2 cc 0 S N o 1, r I. v r 2 . DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14 2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPT - 10TH ST STREET-END OPTION 1 2.8.6 ART DECO MUSEUM BUILDING AND PLAZA gel.'?),:,:i:•-.*•!..,: "'"-:4-.$4 c% .04. It'll• , - •• i '\ : ,...1 • Y .yam ti ^'� / _ �. `I ,f,, qw : 4. : h a. tir -ri-i_ 1;.: r , sitiiiiii ` ` , rl ' \ , yit - Wit ►:.-t . Y,�'',.."4 +`• . .. •- . sioz`N. --.*i0 - , , (�yy� +,. '"1:. .. , - .:- '••- •'.."--„A.4. i .•y, •-ii 4- v = . .--4- lc t .44 - .,,„ 4, ii ' r: , , , iv:. ' •-•-• \-.-‘, .. . '4".1 71;1 t 1' i ' 0 0' ii 1 ' i ' - +e, �. > t r -� _may# �' _ •«» Y • •a• . 'r,Kati.• ..` fil 4 {r, •/ — r , _ - s •„,. ,_.. ,.. r ,, ., e, ,i, 4, „.y DRAFT REPORT#4-0,2.14.2022 } _ - • n t , r11111 'r...` .s.' 7.,'"sr' -.: :11*.' r • r t V . : ,. LA •� • ill I -�.!� N t rY lk. I lit c ,..-- ,, A ‘,.. to ,,„..... --per-' d i,. '• 'r d ____ . � -_ y t 4 ,• '. ....______,.... .44,, •,..„--.4r.v.__ . * �f' „ .y.r +11111:: ,- , �/: :.. �a • iip_.. ill , .. gliPse- lilt :: ''- I !r. .K #14111......' 1111/111" a r r t II ' 'iir G ,1 1 Li 4..• *ET -i. - , . . )korid' I.:, A" i -,---..' , ! 1 1 f i 1 N ,-.1 iit!ei iryt' li , e Alp• i 1 0 1 1 , ... ri, t ,itri,. . ./ , • 1 7.. - ' --- a.. 4 Urban Plazas Examples DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPT — 10TH ST STREET—END OPTION 2 2.8.7 OPEN PLAZA/STAGE + .c ' �� l • .: •Ft t\'....2'%tpliii ,,' .44 : ,..'it"..... „ -44.„. ..., ^• '11404. ill! ,N . • ., , .. YA'40/* ' '- ,- • 4„.,.-.79.. •qk . ":* .- + t. s,•, , ''s-; , , 47;:' ;., „ . ' . t• ., f ' } fit, 4X ,fK, t , 7�a k.,� c. .af� ., )(1 L*14*. ''..v '- - ' n i . :1— - ..:' '. : , -II It • ,, , L i, r .d`.N 4_ a. °J r DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 1 • t ; ` 11 S • iti�J . 44;);:3 L .. .41:1:.41,7•1\,'lt-... . ,,,,,IT:\jik-1 l' )411 '' ' ' t 1. • ..:a. 141111k1 'N•R• 'it. ' ' !4A', , ... ' i V . . 41) 17.1.5(111. .6 — . 11iirl .„ Agii!').:.°.;:. . I , . '- " t k.w Zf*YP - •• 'pi ■ l • I . / `{ ILV rAa rr r _Al r 1IS .r/...-. ar l;.f • ...Mow . Public Art and Open Plaza at St. Pete Pier DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS 2.8.8 LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTUAL VIEW _ - lid... 1 1.7 . ir:_...41::: AI 7 L t ,,� s .a.r,t4 r . .:: :-:-.14:*:- '''''''-'.*---- voli T "At ' .JIM,pe ,' t, a �..,w,r .,.`1:- .7,1,....-.' �."� J1.r 41.410Fir * .lh C 5i " r _ ... ., - * k; ' 'rid Y.. tifk i'I - - - 1 -+i a 4 -- gistw � lir. AP �'+ :`••• ! 'l -mow d': 4 11 a. 111 1r w111 a" I. - ' 1 - I •�,� �,..�..Tay il fk, f.. ,. k g ' a ,: i �� Existing Conditions Aerial 1 "IN:U VISION 1,1 AN.(-1IF Of MIAMI UI ACH r 1 '4. .'I f 1 if 'i#)ri i thy � �� r ,q1111 1.1 I 44 ii yi'14, i i / /1/441 11 )11 i ill) V.- a I • r , ., - ..a.„.: - -... , _ _ it . . , .., L 4 'iw. - ? II e • 4 ir- v 4- ,i "It -1 -' '4 1 { . ,�h 4t , si4, t . i f i__ -i ;•tip 0 it z t t I i • i - viii : •. r /r I t, - . . s k ,,,,,,, - . . - • - , .2,,, • , - _ - \i„ 1400tv - . 1,..c‘i lit ; I r ..r pia. F' E.- �" t t � ' •( E ` ► , •a.. .. i ' 3* f4C _ I 6 • .f11 ifff• . s — ¢4 ? DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 CREATE A COMPREHENSIVE TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN The transit and mobility plan are an integral and important Major Collector,for Collins Avenue is Principal Arterial and for component of the vision and how it is proposed to solve the Ocean Drive is Local,in this area Washington Avenue functions urban issues of this district. more as an arterial and Collins Avenue as the collector. The transportation study area boundary is between 5th Street The vision of this area has identified future priorities on all roads. to the South. 17th Street to the North. and then the three 13) major corridors Washington Avenue. Collins Avenue and 1.Ocean Drive is envisioned as a pedestrian oriented street with Ocean Drive,as seen in figure 7.The study of influence„which cultural venue,park access,beach and resident access.hotel extends to Alton Road.represents the zone where the potential pickups and drop offs.deliveries and strolling. for a neighborhood traffic study is considered.which is why it encompasses a broader area. 2.Collins Avenue is more for the local access,any future transit wilt be more of a local shuttle with frequent stops and low y Intuitively,people who drive to Miami Beach from the mainland capacity.It also envisions hotel pick-ups and drop offs.deliveries. CO on MacArthur Causeway and want to move through the city. walking and biking, will use the West side of the city through Alton Road.which is described as the Mobility District and shaded blue.The yellow 3.Washington Avenue is envisioned as the mobility corridor with is the Flamingo Park District,which is the residential part of the regional transit connections.multimodal connections and it is area and in orange is the main access to the Cultural District. essentially the gateway for accessing the entire Art Deco Cultural District. The analysts provides an evaluation of the area used by vehicles and pedestrians as a percentage of available space in the right The Miami Dade 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan ILRTP) of-way in the various street sections.The gray sections of the has three 13)proposals that impact the ADCD study area.as seen graphic bar indicate the portion of the right-of-way used by in figure 8.The most prominent one is the Beach Corridor Transit. vehicles in each section.and the orange/red represents the area whether it is a monorail or light rail. The ridership estimates used by pedestrians. 12040)are between 28.000 and 42.000 riders per day.Another proposal is the BERT(Bus Express Rapid TransitI Corridors which The summary table of the major corridors describes its ownership, will be in the Washington Avenue corridor in this study area. traffic volumes for 2019, 2020 and future 2035. number of And lastly.The Washington Avenue Bicycle Facilities plan which lanes,functional classification,FDOT Context classification and is a long range transportation plan of priority three(31 area for study area priorities.Interesting to note that even though the protected on-road bicycle facilities on Washington Avenue. functional classification designation for Washington Avenue is nl4 iVl:Iii,PI Mil (IIit)1 MIAMI III All) DRAFT REPORT# TLR/ NDRANSIT MOBILITY PLAN f §° AREAO INFLUENCE IZia• '� : i 1 , I 1 I" i 1 i I i Mobility District 1 li [Alton+Dade] i Ilt I � I �1 I 1 1 CO [Flamingo Park Historic District] ._ 1 I 1 I CI AM5N(4) 1 I 1 Access District --' I I t [Cultural District] I . : I u, 1 A4R1 I I I I r4• I. 1 IW i I ice Lfir�� IQ IQ Figure 7 oiiiik DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN '.1 —•—•_ _ :3.2 STUDY CORRIDOR SUMMARY ACCESS NASHINGTON AVE COLLINS AVE OCEAN DR 5TH ST TO 17TH ST 5TH ST TO 17TH ST 5TH ST TO 15TH ST 11.25 MILES' 11.25 MILES' 10.9 MILES' WASHING TON AVE -__- (r (01 LIMO AVE ' t'1C.EAN DRIVE I HMMI AT PAPM- MI H MO R(rIS(brit h l A ; Ptik, i , ... it SIA 1116, 411YE. . 4:1* ''' liiiiiii I ul. ,iliiiiuiuniii► Iiuiiinwwi !wninn * 134 20'3-, I42 1 MINUTE WALK 1 MINUTE WALK Transportation Priority:District Access/All modes 0 Transportation Priority:Local Circulation/Access Transportation Priority: Walking+Greenspace Ownership:Miami-Dade County gi Ownership: FDOT o Ownership:City of Miami Beach AADT(2019):23.000 AADT(2019): 12,900 AADT(2019): N/A AADT(2020): 14.500 //�� AADT(2020): 14,100 AADT(2020):N/A `� Future AADT(2035):22,818 Future AADT(2035):20,011 Future AADT(2035):N/A Current Number of Lanes:3(2 through lanes plus Current Number of Lanes:0 Current Number of Lanes:3(2 through lanes plus � left-turns at intersections) left-turns at intersections) Functional Classification:Local Functional Classification: Principal Arterial(Other F... pil 0 Functional Classification:Major Collector(Urban) Urban) Florida Context:N/A Florida Context: N/A o Florida Context: C-5 W n Study Area Priorities: no Study Area Priorities: Study Area Priorities: E • Cultural venue,park,beach& • Circulation resident access • Regional transit connections • Hotel pick-ups and drop-offs • Hotel pick-ups and drop-offs • Multimodal connections • Deliveries • Access to Art Deco Cultural District • Deliveries • Strolling • Walking,biking,local transit I AfI(II VPSit)N PI AN.(1l t III 411.AMI 131A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN 3.3 MIAMI-DADE 2045 LRTP . . Rocommendod Solutions ��� 1 .seer a Y:.: -Pm ,.M Mu.r.f.Mnfbn IAVMI M..•ri•r�ro ww••r++r••� { 1S1 • 'f_' r. I�Proposed Tupelo*/AVMAIO O d) ••r►r�.r Q 1, • Proposed M.P.e••a e.NPuon �,._..`. 12 3 ' ..-IO.A¢.1Mf yu•lTroMy1 .•.�wr� rr{' a,. •., CarM•Cty,b Patentor0,411.11.0......1. s ,sr. ••To R. &pmAro Slop . •••r•r.r. midve ,,, jy •.<.-M•Srorrbwr.w<7 s,,,on. "•`v'"••''—.••• y�M�►C.M1► 14 S 1 S 3 • • 8 Metrp..*nth Sn.ons •tir••••._.•.••M. ' L' . .... Co ���r. Beach 130 129 _ B • 130 low. '� • ge . 1 J o_. 1 AO O .M .. ... wwnta►►.n t ® 13 3 •: S ilk > •> IPO. y Figurer" . ' ... ...� u BEACH CORRIDOR BERT(BUS EXPRESS RAPID TRANSIT)CORRIDORS WASHINGTON AVENUE BICYCLE FACILITIES Igiil'nNI II I(PH I I,r U, A1IAMI iil1I111n,'„,(1\,R!; I h7 DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN 3.4 RESTRICTED ACCESS One of the main concepts of this transit vision is to create a pedestrian/bicycle • " priority area by deprronbnng automobiles in this cultural district.It is proposed to 7111\ 4. '+ • have a restricted vehicular zone East of Washington Avenue and there are several i L N. ideas on how to restrict vehicle access 41. . ' ])Diverters it., 1 dDiverters.such as retractable bollards,help w reducing motor vehicle volumes a!�‘ '\ •: •speeds by making the cars not want to be in the area from a design perspective. .. ••• .. - E , s .p'i Congestion charge - . '� •There are now more and more cities that have a congestion charge:the lesson is 44.- •'a ♦ .l ' international.The main concept is that when a vehicle passes through a tolling � s Ni . .,, ( '. facility it will be charged based on its license plate residents and those qualifying S J - ► I. under ADA will be excluded.One way we can reduce the issues currently affecting ` -• •• _ - - ♦ . ._ South Beach is by reducing the elements that create the chaos.over congestion. •'•( _.aY..� - • and lack of control over the streets cars and cruising. ♦ - r.. ��s, Iil i = I s t A • \ lit 1, 1 f I. •r /r-. r - .• . 7 •_ t- . '.0 _ "'.1-a� ` J 1 I I t t IN O• 7r, .7' .. I tw�� - .-.- ,:", . , . _• •• -^-�A. ., 't".� `-tea - • r. • r T RETRACTABLE BOLLARDS ,11 N-11\.Ir.IoN,l'l nh (I I,,III Mb1Ml Ill Al H DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 3.4.1 CONGESTION CHARGING - LONDON CASE STUDY • It has reduced congestion and provided better transport services.cleaner air and safer roads. Or` • The number of vehicles driving into Central London is a quarter lower than a 0 T ra n s r" der:ade ago for l.o n d _ n • Cycling levels in the Congestion Charging/one are also up by fili per rent since the introduction of the scheme. • • Has encouraged people to use public transport ‘ I 4 e S t o n • The emphasis of the charging scheme on low emission vehicle is said to have Gong Improved au quality. • h a r 9 n(� • In the first decade of the scheme's operation this generated an extra 11 2 hellion C for public transport in London. Il t W , ,,,. .... roposed new congestion zone FOiNAIE *wool 1TM/,ANiiT! II ilk k MEN w::' '''' , lAl11N �; 10111 NEY/IETA >TIITFOII IlFON1 __ Nio� 0 NENNAY ?��� _,,,/ 'OAiEMN1 .7 ,^-��. EENSINGTI 1 lik 0 0 �`'� �i$f, Central � I -_ �sy congestion zone ""1`T°" 11 t'-'l NINIEE/ONzo ""GHIET LONDON CONGESTION ZONE . tor r,jr ,it. ,.. .,„ „ . 4 417, ,te..,,,. ::-.4., 41,,,...-,.. .-,,It . • r� 0 . ''#' I` . lift ' - 11"ft tit.". •fil' T 4 - * ,..... I fi t r • .4 t r r is .t ;l 4111P a kik. lie ' • i • •• M -,. 1't.0. •• aiP,j.., ,.;4 M ! .mow ` ire ,,,, ;‘, 'W.. 40 li ii , ii ,, ..„..a, i : . ji,. to r -.. -. .... . eTf r T ` • e +i . yr . i Aim. „ ar. q , 1 'f - - ,16,. ?"111 •a4i.N,Iiiii , . , .,, de .. **gF.. .ri ' . I , V .""10141%, ' 1 i, ',..0 t.- „ iii, t. . rth 1.1.4` it or ill s 4 . . . 4 .. . ........_ t torow, .....„ .. ,.... r "II' A A . ...Mr It::i I OK •� Ali. fit • b ,•> r ,� Ai Mg& - .. - 1 fit'n( . .,. . . .,,.1/4. ,. , . 11 ,......., i Ii t -illk,1414) ' ... liro """ ill611111-1j " -- di + • déstrin tr - - o z .... t. . 1 4.0,S..11. 'I,('/i:1A. IP 1.\ ..,,, 4' ,.. ,, ..,.. • • i\..-\. ,. ,.illk, . 44, eff. e .„.. y 10, DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 .14tI ,, 1 \,. ' , . , : Z. r �'� ,yet _�,r '► L. �. is ''w •01 ,' �s "sews ,,i.1, 'r110i►i` N'I -_ K` '' . ' '*-.: . A i -. ' .''' , L. ' 4, trr", qiqi • "" . : 011111*—.',, -,!. -- - - •"..,1 '', ' '. ' '"` ,,. . ., ,,, ,2 ill - • 4.1„; ;,'._,.. jiitil, 1-1,141-4"..,:asa..,voloar— .4.162"."°1111.1"Ant•-'—': N‘islk41!_1‘k\ sli II4-1714 - . '''.. ' '44:.C.'14"- Ik: ;:-.141 -"41116- '4. . 1.,\slItv.. . ,4. ir, , 444 �. T' f ' '., • /j 7 7, lOTH ST 7. 4 I.. AIL 0 - ' ar ,/ • .y COLLINS.AVE �. --'tom '�• _ IINCO�L•N RD Nig N T \ t. v 1 ! —.. ' r, _-� •��� lw � fir` _:., .�, ' ',"_ • r I� jib -- 7- �. �.J q•�_ Al� : ..� • , '��;'rl a . Y 1 Y-: .. . - MIM.11tiLAl.+i to,_,..urva.H 1 , r.. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS 3.5.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS , .. f,.,-.. - - , op ,, ' 444 '.1r.,P It'b I a. wy •,.., AM" MIR. am I ? I i 'CT i r u VALET AUTO AUTO PARK III + EXTENDED auto PARK OD PAR•K 10 5 7 SIDEWALK in.F,' 7'ill 1 4 *. .i• =Ian F 1ti C'+ •.RAJ. >.._ 4 y� s1�' ''.ti 4 yr , k • '" %... . _ i a a . ,.t.. 4. - N- t R I�'JI R;+ • Existing Pi Pandem Imo% jiff Existing/ fi,, Pandemic tirtil1 flirt A Existing/During Pandemic Images 60% 40% 100% 1 AI1CI1 VISION I I AN.(list OF MIAMI RI A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Before the Covid 19 pandemic, the road configuration consisted of two travel lanes,two parking/valet lanes,one 10.5 foot wide sidewalk and one 14.5 foot wide sidewalk shared by pedestrians and sidewalk cafes.For most of 2020 and 2021.the configuration allows a 19 foot sidewalk cafe expansion and another 19 foot shared pedestrian and bike space where lanes of travel once were. ,of.. , ._..... . ... , ,• . • s +INF' r 1 .., 1 ,....... , ......„. 1 t i . , •Isii • • • 1 rill 4 , • __ ,. ., 1 . 14 ' ... i.P. lit „ . . . ...- . „•, , :,.. ,r,-, ,, . _ ,yi'';iii'lleger." ' - .......,,,, 4 ""), -: . ,,,„,. 4,,, . -.•'- - .... -: c'. I ! • .‘ 40 • qt. A ik, j„,„ ,.., ....Or T �� dim. - ,,'/ .I -. - '' n a gjIiiA' i. • ,,, r F • 'fil: ,, Ni .-t• 1 ).� iira ' . 1_ if 111 ; ' poff CIE Jew: i I 4' ...lv 4 k 4•4 let ' , J a— I V, I —..... a - • - .• o..-..-. >or 1 4 '.'.4 4;:..', • �• ;,- � x r I • , ., ii * PRFPARCD FOR CITY OF MIAMl BEACH B•r;i ..,,,(i l 1 13 ! r DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 1 3.5.2 PROPOSED PARK + TWO-WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREE 1 II S.S ~f V tr.r, A''4Y ti•i7 s ' 4f • - - L \ :1 H ' • )1... ;I:•::;* 7 I:.•„I 5 0 4 p..• :41 p;•:. . .•,,.:1 I I: •,,:"...I( 'Aka- r . • - I, k- , • -,../..- .jr. .. :7 ........ s„, . , , ,..,,4,.. .t _• ,-, .. , .'"•2 .01 i. 03 /SIDE AUTO AUTO IUMMUS J M .. r ) !. i 4•N L �; ♦. :`-:' i •• .i.kit'-;.:,i '., • - F CO 8• 10' 10' PARK \ • • j 's 1 S ^ .. - R'J.' . t,: • �' it), � — +T.e'= . `•- .f• .r \; •. o_ t . • .1; "..A! ,••• _ si i. � EeI ' i•', Pi I A a Act , . Al; '''.-- ? Ill - .- ' c . ....—. Asior*tc:'14..4.t.•:wasi\,1•1 sylrrirs' i :' , -, : -4 , li r i i i i •I i Kt •,,.=alilra-ii'-' .i rivE ‘,lir . e - *11$ii____iitlidil.A:I' grill-.I I I 11111 ) -.-.:- . r • . .. ttttt??1 ow. if*f tti 1.,.Fz,,,,,.,.:,.. „.., me ® Al rf I)VIGp7N PI AN.(11),u1 MIAMI hi AI DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 The intention is for Ocean Drive to be a pedestrian priority street and to feel as if it is From a limited vehicle access perspective.the street should be designed as an infrequent part of the park.In this option.it is proposed to bring the trees closer into the buildings vehicle movement/low capacity road and not intended for through trips.With drop oft while maintaining the sidewalks open so that there is a perception of the park starting tones in each block that would allow for passengers to he picked up/drop-off closer to at the facade of the building.Figure 9 is an example of a narrow organic shape two way the buildings. roadway through a park with a wide sidewalk that would allow for strolling,dining and Ingprr landscaping tones with similar character to the Rambles. •'NI Illi ‘x . - „. - - . _ -- -. .- , . . - . .. „,,, So . il ...t. • .\ ‘Ill'''''''''Slill‘. . • \ , ,fk\.. -,... ' v :.,... , . Ir.401611, • .. i . tiOrr-' '\4.- 7 ...".. i.; 14'. . . , . !..1P, t. ' „ . .- ,e''4.,: • '' ' , t t. • k 1 ,,- , 0. iii \ F +' �. .Nitoiriii,,-, ,i, , , ..:;�•4 c .voit,....;;;...;,' , ;,, - i: �, Val n� • •�("• 1►1 { . ' :14:,..:: ''.. .kr- Ili. )/ -I ,r �. t :''',1 'I':.1 Item- m'q iq ' ' Y} � i •iv • 1 ii ti' ' t if «1 ' , • F • yJ P ., - - , ;. 0, ^ _..._�,�.. / .J, " lip;-mil + J 1 f• _ ‘I,il3\ •1 ' • .. ;; ..`Y I - 4►•1%4 cr.ca; 3r .,/n f, Srf` f r • '�ttn . i i .4' t " s DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 2 3.5.3 PROPOSED PARK+ ONE WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREET 1 t . :VIP .4.ilt 1/4 .4 : **. • .0.. ... . .4„ . ,. 44.,. .4 .,;.,. 4 0%, )1,4, iIii . . APP Ilk 11 f: ... CUR© , u Biki * '" LUMMUS CD SIDE t. ;�r �< PARK . 4 1 J '� 4 !„ , 1 1 , .0 4........„......„ , • i 4 s _ -- , , All) IF.. . e ail 4 1,01, O / 4:,r, : ilt / OF 0 ?T?ttlitti tirtfttiti DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 This option is similar in character to option 1.but it proposes the narrow organic shape roadway as a south bound one way street adjacent to a cycle track,as seen in figure 10. This street should be designed as an infrequent vehicle movement/low capacity road and not intended for through trips.With drop-off tones in each block that would allow for Passengers to he picked up/dmp off closer to the buildings. '. 1+.' tied: l i \� �•. •�, .car' .� � '.:Alt°41::.‘.11':'....:4 s1 ,k, ‘\ i . % , '' , 0-ii ',, V Ai' • r"-.7,tt .. - - x '11' 1: -t • 4' • .. .. ,..t ie. , .. ..._s 7 „' ) A •A•... ;„,-. . • - ..'1140. 4,.., : , w •111 II ''' ''a lir 1:14 I: 1 It .'ik" li.'. fly` . *� , ,• •r, . ,?'''. 1 j \. ilf 4 , ., , . 1* • is ° :,, 0,„..". '� ii; ' -ir `+i I` � ....,, 1i� j • r."-- 4 0 rt"�\\N-I 41 ! 1•11 '4 4. , ou, 111 4 Aiiir lit''''.. F 1 1. IP :\IF. + _� d •rf \N rr' Y �_ , �.. ,mac ► v- "w-Sill1111*; , P.1 ` Y�i Y 1M .. ce `'/► �-'. 1_. • - iiira-. 7.:0"41:‘,..... i. do, • +► - - --, Y r,, i• - ,.' : ::: 1 iri. t • y �_ i A y�al DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 3 3.5.4 PROPOSED PARK + PEDESTRIAN ONLY STREET op_ ma irit „ - ,_ , . 'T.' -• •4., f‘, •-• ' - • 41. , •'; , ,\* %)4*-•••."- .k..!' '-‘,°: 'V. ill 11,).i • • CT 00,1 ''• Tfig444,.. ,'t,A f'•••40 V • " .7".., • ' S', , .->r•-,-,.. 11 \ ' ,......_ • . rt.. i A, '‘ •k t. 11115 MI* Aill j 14.ii 1111,.r. : * * ''' .L. 1,3", 1 tt • ir - i Mr 4 _ - -A 04 ki 4 1- ( .1 ) j '. I ILt 451 11.4,`,. . • • 4 ole .. • 11' -' i 4 l i * '' " '111 '''. ' ''' I 4. 4 'V '.4 ' \ ' ' ' -',:-. ' ". i '4 _.... .. - •ott'r _ :''...1 g _„.... 7.4.,','1 - - 1111ga tie..„01=_ ,....._. • ' 1 •11 e 1 MO 11 It Ili'e -1---- I- --- -IT i — --ilr'r;',:' - milb"sr:ai.- - ,-1111AIK _ - _,.. ....... ..., amain \ I . , --........_ .11111111•, * ..mona Jpilk . ...- MO. ; iff ..,.. -•••••• - Il• .•, ' ,74 .. • ..fft, p If VA - 'V. , • • - , - . •"__, ‘411. '11 s''‘'•-„ II li * 1"*. ' ..t . 1..i.,1 . I 1'II T 5/, : , '•,, Illt - 4 M* •th'v 4 . '''-- • ...• .4r- S: .. * ..---4 01,ti, .4. .0 I ,''-..,• ... .4'I,.ff,...., ..- - ...4 .1 ._... .11 ii . , . '''''‘',P. '' ... :..r,'., . , 0 Ap .er 'r-:. '. ...... • • t'iA0 4 -.A' kL,.•....„. IfL' , 4"4t 14:144i i I•.,c.i"..,t,.,..3'•P.,'t,T:I.•t •• • . .?.''.r sm..i.'.7i l:l.4P'•:.aI J"O il.f''2i l"10 5a A' jr^0*'-1-- ' .„.•,1,N.,_,,r...4. ,.,..,,:;., .1 4 ... ,"••\••.% '1 .O.— — ---", ., ..:' ).. .owl .04 N. • , • .,,, • -vamp tftfittiftt 100 I ,,..,,,,,,,()N VIAN (IT Y Of MIAMI Of ACII DRAFT REPORT#4 —02.14.2022 This option assumes Ocean Drive as a pedestrian only street.similar to some of the options City staff have recommended for the near future.As seen in figure 11.it Is proposed to be an organic path with a twenty i 201 foot,one which is cleared of any streelscape elements on the eastern edge of the path that would also serve as emergency access. iii \ • iio , % 41111.„\ii Itt •Vil. ;;. ' \• ' ii.i. ' , ' .' -,,,,....1,, , _.411,„. - ,., jp....„.s„:,,.',.r'.'.e..r,.'.,1." , . :.,4,ler? .', ' ,‘„0.,'.*.'"'.:4„..,...:',..,,,‘ty.:14.1,......1::'‘,.‘ .:04.. ,...,..,,,., ..'':4'' 014. , too.416:14,, y: ...1, i: II ---' 111 II !, ' , ,,, .,..,. ,,,,,; . , ,I- .', A .A i., ',' ,. .t-z, f-,. 44 , + . ' tta. .*. 117If 4 14 ' Mr "Ili 1�J AA r +7N ` — , , , 4 tk ...,„ 4/,'... .' 24, 'i "-1. i : II r•; ':lii, ' i. ' -I .i i • .. a 7 ' 1III,� t w per � j ;i �y 1 #_ i "II Id! 4 mt M"w ` „ / be s t. t. as.� / i ,. : *.. h.)11, • T • • ; 410)'44 .1 -- '• lak `7. ,t ' '""rt a arY _,.... • DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS 3.5.5 EXISTING SIDEWALK CONDI110N w 1- tr ca.l ir 4.4 Icr -../.." .„r , . , , ; • ,. .... • I I9 c.. iI I I' - li....,-,%tit ' friitiy.s :k ' • w Hirt nn ..,--:.,. p 010100 • WTI .:4 ,.;iiipm*I.'''---,I 't ::.4 '•C ... ' ,__•...0 •, ' , , .,4k - %, • r _ ..,, „.. , ..... .: ....: . .- R iw�wr , ,, i ,,.' ' j ofir • '�•+, �� 4..�'' 1.f 7 _� ♦' `•!~, it ` ell • "• 1 �L.. .;a • 'ti'• I 'a,. ..+4, • ' ,ri .` ' , • • *4 IINE :'4'I 4 - J i w ti 1 Iir '' .I r a ' s p 1 .1 '*-- .4 it .1" ill ' Ajt ___ . . ,• .II. ' Alic„. 1 f I. Ilioh, , It ' , r r" i• t,e, .. . ,;1•1111. 414 Al.. 'till/4 !..11 t• F it A , t• s • ` A.. . ..ram �; .... '11. lic, y, .. ili I. • , v• - ' vt, „•_ •r�iw em+ . .� wok, �, „, ere i r - , - I i - 4. rr ` I I AMID VISION PLAN.CI OF MIAMI BEACH - . DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS 3.5.6 PROPOSED EXPANDED SIDEWALK { s ti ..// i Iiiiirpy . , . , • • • ' 4 •„,y; _ .• ., , ...• ., • ,,,. ..., .., • ,& ,,,,,,,/, .• . , . . .... . • .. ..,.. , ., , _ .,„ ,,, • . , „ *...,... ,_ , , , tr..: #A ,i'I s• . , —, 6'k A \\v \ `:4. • �. /t. ;It! I�iiut �� v„.. , _. .„....... .. ,,, • s w 1 • tit4. .. �tb`,' _ ,* - '► ' W�'�A- / r . J4,• I ' i ,, /),1,111.. . ' \no/ '. ! ..11) t• tc'TO ' A 4 1 •N i'lit 1 .1841t , ik.k. . •fte• • , ,,it., 1'1 , ' ••• -1" "...,../ ' N.--. 1, -• ,,,,„. ....v,i. . ,,, , ,. . . . .., 4, ; . :. , a • 9, 4 \ i, I, % . a i Iv y i a IP • i -fr., r .Amiitti? . . ,,,,.,,t_. fri ,,___ 4 01 Ai , , . ‘ ..:. . 44 is • * 1.•'."' 491116.4 / , 'A ,i . - 0 ,, t h, �' I it AIR , - .4. 100 • ,. 7 .� / 1�, �' � 1 `n ti �•. 1� t . — • i tip - �.rn... .ara 1 !hu Q .-. ..,{ ` ,'� 41b >♦1 �. II li'l .... -1. A :up i v.,,,; . I 1 ifi IN'kl...- I ' , ,..i. ...... ,• - joiv$1.:21- 41,. - ' , .... f ,,, lAil -.. , „,,,„. .‘v..\11. r,� ti DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 I OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS 3.5.7 OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTUAL VIEW . : -.y �" .ai ... I • t• I i. _ .. . e .--itgoillte , • ., • .F ... (.0 filligr";rij 1". ii..._ 4 ...._P • ..itlrttttl 1 II _ • t �11111.1'_ OOP.; IIILL i I ,- .,••• ». • ilk r Y . 4 •1 •♦ ' ,, -- - ,1 i . „,,,,„ 4,......, .. ......,.. eiik...t.I6. f . ' P, . • A M IA _.. .., . 1 _ , „ ....„, 4,.. • , ,,.. . „ ~+ Aii . -.„,_ . 7,61:1111111iipiii4- Existing Conditions Aerial 1 .i,.a l,',i,,vi,.f91•-..Ill,•p \1I.A`.9i III V II ., f , , • ;to'. ,4 #, 4 • • Illh /1 s t: a �' i,4,, . f , iNifileri. 0. , 4 z • N� •4 ..�'< .r*'' ti••'...r+ 'ems .�, • • :• 1 ... +•: e. .' • l - ^• • - ' I.: 40, ......, .,. . , ., .. , i„,'"' 4 - .`7"*- - • .. t + .i Y" 1 rtt i ) .r -sw oit :.. A' .. _.., - •- ,. ../ Wr O. AP�•r'- .ram ,Ri w . oia. - :. . �• ` . '; .. .,-: ,... . ,! t• ,, #ilet ,,,,_„1 , ..._ , ,, i.. L .' y ' '•f r r i ' • `y ,� l . :' I, ., R'T -sly • .o. • -.. ,.,,,;., ..., 4. _-__,,,, -,• . ,-. ) ,.... . '';, L ,,....... - fit} r '"*+-' .A+ �G . I 1 - rL� d - * •• '' '10.1r*- .7.41-$1, :Vv.;i(i -A 1 N - t t. J ,.1„nn,t y S 4 �, . . . sr 4.• . • • -L.--...--.-- - ----r1 -----X-- --- ----...--. • .6_ _ . T I - _ _ . • . _,...„ ...„, . . • _._ _ .. .....,_ k-- - • - - 4 •-— " ^"' -4, • , '11444.., - -or-- ..... i 4°' -? . 4 _4 ...--- P. . ^.. .e . . __ . . 1 :ytit ' • ' . .', .tl,11 i I IHNI AirMINIMOUSININOININNIMISMONNOMMUlleallgIMW *.s4,,.s.-s.,,lip,lk — 111 '''' • . , 4,-----1::<, ''f• ., _ _ i i 10 NI .-- • 49 rvirirtilldLITI jzilli to • it • co P it III • 1 .... \iir . ilegla iip t „..tili, #. # - A A.0 . . I . .ralk Air iii N. , r ,.f„, •, • a/ „A - ',•,'., • I'L.,.!. . _ . . 111111 . ..k. .... ,-- ....i.i. .,-.4 ...... II di , •,,, e , .. '' . • . 84 I ADC°VISION PLAN,CO Of MIAMI BEA(H 161144\ ,.. . -. I DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 spAtt Aa.., - r 'F 7!l 1 i ,,,,i1 i' r!',�,�-�LJ-c..4 ` _ �� ,-Altilize fin Finis/ Rcal ] ' Ng - , t 3Sw ma's.. « `"`` L'1► .,R •Wrii I 4, 7— ir from - ., ---v 5/A111101 - •-;'.. f""jib in . ‘ li1/4 V•• IA.-IL \‘' c$41 , . FJ.- Mall: • hM Ir.' r� Fl t' I !, • .i ji! � � ' toH1 'M`1 a j1 5 :* '%51. 1-'-' X.:-.' --'‘, "E' r 7. �..- t /2� �j �r tit; �— lOTH ST - J -F ,. -T i ' / P. /• 7` ;IIPL::Aua . . ✓r----‘1112--Ai.. • !_4111__ ..., -.OUt1i AYElOCEAN DRJ _—L—_vr s. 1 1 1 R C+r. • • ill . 4". ..s�"�.:J�g�;I. *ter.. •�".....Y .� r,. i'l ` s' i. •. -ice /�kilt ` ' at 1,A ;`%J y! # — � 1yi11 L , i It ` t' . .. i 1.. te = �� _ 1 ?. a\ I „. • MIAMI U[ACM rjv:VS((AM l i I 85 DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 3.6 COLLINS AVENUE-SHARED TRANSIT STREET This mobility plan aims to have a circulator that would allow local north south movement within the District.It is envisioned in two ways. 11 Until such time as a monorail connecting Miami Beach with the mainland.if al all. it is proposed to have the circulator connection between Washington Avenue and Collins Avenue.moving on Collins Avenue on a Northbound direction.turning West O on 20th Street.then south on Washington Avenue.in order to make a connection O at the Convention Center.then turning East on Lincoln Road.where the proposed stop and transfer station Is located.and turning back south into Collins Avenue.as seen in figure 12. 21 When the monorail is in place.and there is a functional mass transit system.the circulator moves to Washington Avenue.which would serve as the district access transit street.Figure 13 shows the transfer station being proposed either between Lenox Avenue and Michigan Avenue.which is where the County has it currently proposed.or as proposed in this Vision Plan.between Washington Avenue and Collins Avenue.as seen in figure 14. •• I Al'Ii VISION PI AN.CITY 01 MIAMI lit AC II DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 N 3.6.1 LOCAL CIRCULATOR ALTERNATIVES O Two-Way Collins Avenue 02A Two WayMonorail Collins Avenue r� Two Way Washington Avenue Il0 Circulator conneclron t>ntween ronnect ion in place.circulator moves Monnred connection in plain.dreulatnr WOW,Washington Ave and Collins Ave to Washington Ave.with transfer station between 0 .C._-. to Washuigtnn Ave,with transfer station between Lenox Ave and Michigan Ave Washington Ave and Cnihns Ave A I A ,7 ;17°°° • • FTUD A• ►8•• D_ART • — T CM .w_w+-�— .tUD • BQ' [VIZ.. CAA ..- c U• BY ��Y� 111 1 I 1 I / 1 I r / i..I1l1II i ; t11I J ; c , -f 1 j I i .I.l'1!: 3 1j I 1 I 1 rI I 1 (1 1 I 1 • 1 / 1 I/ I 1 I I I l l 1 1 / f 1 . / 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 I 1 �l I I I ` I -I • • I 1 1 I I 1 / h I f l I I tee«.onY., t r' ,. ( amuaa.... i,, 1- r '_�; r0f.6•K••m. + • ...•M.MYIwM.�•. " • u.W 4iH" 111, • •C•nn s. .rn Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure I DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I COLLINS AVENUE 3.6.2 SHARED TRANSIT STREET Currently.Collins Avenue has two 121 6 ft sidewalks,two(21 bidirectional sharrow travel 't lanes,one 111 shared turning lanes and on street parking on both directions. Existing 111, — ft SOSL 20% IV PARK AUTO AUTO AUTO PARK ,lDE WOONERF SIDE 8' 9' 11' 9' 8' 8' 20' 8' Pt I ,;1 I i Proposed PS el .!1 1110 - 4 Ai 1 zw r. I ? I 4 r°I) 4 7. • iriff * I 1 q . , I at 64 4 I I . tttftu ,r AI I I it ilw n Innl,• Existing Proposed-Two Way Cu culator Col s Avenue 1 •Atr('f)VIGUN PI AN (ITN,()I MIAMI III A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 .1 ¶ I ,.."', ! 1 1 • 1 . •70.7 1 ALA__, ROO DO BOOB i-.,., 0 f, .._ __ _ __ . .: • . "... b__, I-1 i.I di] Fffl ftfl ffli -- - r- - - - - L.J.LI LILI , t ,,... vp, ... VX-1 \All VAI\ VIA \BEE19,a6 M BB8139E1 i El E . 1 - • . 11. /- ,- \ 6.... lieir , \ \ \ \ \ - ,.i VS1 'VE ,1 , ,t , 'EAIT-AREIS MiBEIBIBEIE (.1 .1_ 1... L . r ,,c...t......... - ! 'r ' 1 1 LIU '1,1. li•4 4i. f , 1). ...10.Ilirla ' 1 / aft 1 , . al ISIS AIIII,„ ,' . ' ,111111111. !:911;1 ' illisr ‘04 J4dii'l I 1 '.,'.t.l'•'III/1' ti ! : ....:, ft A#4( I 4 i:k).?•1-4104'"-•#---" - t-S54-;1•17•; :41t-'-- -0; Le'.4 1*' '.4.-; NEM M.r , • • 1\ !mow „4.4t -1....' , re: v, „4,..,i v ' '', - r.tv. r---; ,-r , ...d. A Pr°11 A ., .. ._ NACTO:Shared Transit Street lillir ‘ I- - !C.:L. .I 7'4 . 1- t it ' - r 7.--,.....,._ ... . i -\.•,'- -.' v.... - . r. .. af.. •, . 1 I I i I I! •,,•. 1111/1 11-'10.14 '1' r r . I IL' • 1, . . ..... ,, ,,1, , • . 1 . ..f. . ‘,„ , .., — ,. A , , iv .4 s ,,,,, 7.7/ re: ::.1 r i iiiii,,.*1-1 a •••7 - ',..:. ;:* --,:ir.. ,.. -- * 4.•' - . voirer, •-"IPAV 1 rilliV.,—, ,. rirrr • , 7: T " .1(...A._. A ,•.,. . .. N.A.' .#It..1! 1 f . ,. ,i ,....: j ,• -. '111 - - ," 40, •„..,.. it .4 V ! ..- .griiblr-IM K1• " . • ' i rim 4.- 7-- •- .......- i., „, Xl •W :,---• . -. -,,,,-----1.- . - ... Al .„.....,-— i .... IV'"- ` • I ill" ' .. i /,... .... , 44,1, 4 . inn._ ...... 1 ., ....- i. - f----• DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 1 �4y ll 1 I COLLINS AVENUE , 3.6.3 SHARED TRANSIT STREET CONCEPTUAL VIEW .:,... - 4, , jR ,! •T r`• .� .yam~` ' \ .•� , ..-. 1� r itl ; j r ; • • • -t. gi;1° iiii ." 1 .-1407, I „ I( .)k‘lk : . ' \\ . 'Iv 41' - - '' FP • \ f.• .•i, ,�..4. h� ri ...,, . .., , :,..i., . r .,. ,;iiik t t' - r A.. ,i ' .ik ) , ...,v. _,:1101141PE:k,. ri' :1.4' ",,r.3.,... SW! 71 v ONE WAY t, �• I f J+ 7 .- r i II 1 r • 9 A` , .:_______L A Ili, :: '1 ' 1 , _ jti , i: fir ._ a, 3 •z _ • Existing Street *+„` � r , DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 � ' I i/ i ' ,Thus street is proposed to have the same number of existing through lanes but with a There needs to he a future traffic study that would help identity the intersection treatments shared street character.It is envisioned as a curbtess(woonerfI road that provides local and the needs for this street. I-tf. _/. transit access.with vehicles driving next to people biking and/or walking.Vehicles are slowed by placing trees.planters,parking areas,and other obstacles in the street and the pavement is also part of the visual character of the street. is 1 1 r i ia ( sG ,4,;'4t,r l • /dV* ~ { w got, f ry o4y1 a�tir !'S 4 :f "- 41. • ,. i','��r�r r. V .'.. �''iA�,.•y.�.�l. ,A�'L .),„ * r, yr; i� 4 1. •C« e:. f p A I r `. Y�:� �. �`±.. a� iC Jyi ara it • '. 1� • 1• L.,�„b •t e• •.t``��'"�fl'ir�1. fir(, 4 d `'� ''. l '.' t ,• Y ?� 1, ' �. \ > 'a• \` -1• 2. .11 yF f t, Y ? 1'' rT •- ' f '.f � � f t R r 1 . 1,1 • t ` , .• .. om anlio t fe yy a lir f Y TiL r. a R 1 a. T.. P!Aw. -� I rr. y - I. f ' 4* Proposed ' IL t ` . :._ . l` * „ l r4 * ', •. 1� i' a g �' `\ . " l'il lel 1 %* diti*41t14)0'....a,It• - ‘r ." 1, AY .I.l.•f \ • j i_ ' �3' ' 4. liptleil.ro.- 1`.'Ali a` `' + Of • ' a. ' • • N ...- • •.• ,-. .0 , . • i "2, • ••, •� c .\ .t'r '/r�� }' ts� ��•� �• r E r�... s yr. •t:‘,... .4 , '' -%- 11 .., 4 gyp! • '%i , ♦ , ? T r Rl , ,�. } •I, ,[ di '� iliP i,, J`• .y .t' • 1a.. r.. a 4%. • •.'• Kit � •�r�^ .-`� 4 ,f. �Lc� , 4 1. .:4..*S. -- . • l v . . • , -. .` • •''.i:.. •1 ..ram • r z►, ' ' - 4 FOCH )THEDRALE _ r:, 11AIL`.� ,• . _.•, ',WOW.WlW'•1 r b 1. ii1:: ` F .0I DitctA ce - n eels* • ._ _. •_ — 1% rh . 1 _ . lillrill ♦ • TI _ — _At.... DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 .. .. ''A • ....i 101‘...rAtgt. L, AY. --.1--- A.1141 1 I k 4. 11 .k ....LIV2.,.1-'..:."1. P,..6614AL:• .. .;ii-' - ,— ,,,. .'.Apolior- i. aireffitn.. 41, II 11.7 il'rifIF .IL, r*,) i .'_11124,:04,‘,11N14.‘k.,- , Vtl ‘ "!-* :.- ' -16.,•-' 1......... ...1.,...1. ........,r r• . ., -w,.. ..... .- ,.... ,, . . ..i.--"V‘..-- --k..— ..-•:,...a';'," r:„.5 • .• • " . ,.0). - fir' ,,I. 1111410".'a.'014, .. „ ,--- ---,--1/4... - \ \........, . ...., ..i,L.-„,......,„.., - ,..-....- . _ . ..,„,,.._. „ ...... ,.... , ...._-. . ,.„ -*, - .. .- - ., 9 ' ' • Isittiltai r."'' ' -v.% It '' "lib .5* ' _1:001 , . , . --- , _ • • •g , #. igrar-s autame.,Iiiis,' , \ eisak, sk sly --- • - Is, . ...-_, - . ,L .,...... r- , iiiii "'re aly21_,:f.S.12..:- wit: :. IBM, - , al f• 4........,. jilt 3, •. . r'A 11111-1 /ataki-d-.A4 -Jove .. ., /-"11 .11w4.111Ir "° . .' 4 t I- 'I '• .II. .. ..111111110:: Vilma . , A 05, j 4 /0"--&-. - 7 , _ , r IN;i I I 1 , 0.•• ,-.. _,.. .....,iip•....-, /We A I . ii . . . - r IE • f 1 ,1 I 's liarl, , Air • ' '• Ar i ': ' 's , . _I' ,d _ Mira= :Oilf'.. - ' ' VilP4NM• if 3-'1. ' \ iiibt_-__ _...i. - ..., 47-If 1 ./rl 1 v F .. toj .p. ' ,7.-,-..rii , _ - --. 1011141111111INGION AMC, 'Its.... .... ' , ait 9 L. 1111V -'ii, LOTH ST . -.- - i ;r ta ..• i' , .• ':1 -4., .. .,..... ,, 7 ,.. 4 ,;., iii• uli111,1it . , %2 ,,=----- . , ...• :41Iera: - 4,. . . • . _ "• - • -"' OCEAN DR '...., COLLINS AVF Anal . If litliciit 1. ' a=lin 1E7 . ' •r..if.1•• i. "....1 1 i .11, -,.X`'t *i.1 .- - ‘ . . ,.,, -' 40' ' • •• • ,- ! -==,:,t.4,, 49,/,-/ i, i ' : + _fr. .it' , 0, .... .. • , ... , ... .. i ,. ,, • , , -- : 1,L -, , -I, ..,! , if L - ,‘• 0„ : ,,, ,,41„ .w .x.4 .07.ii, ........ • ,..., 1 0/1/4111/1216117.01r. ' . • - Itir: " . ' "" •eir 1-'1 k . . vi47-1-11..4.;,...P, r,Jit-tri...,ki ..- • iiiiIK. t, : .- -- ... ,-4., ' As . .. .. ,‘, , ,„,.. , , ,: I , ,..,,,... JR.. • ii, . %.•0101. -.4, , j \ -: , • N — -t ' - .4r . ,4bAjoympoiri; rt.._ _......4. . .A.,; . i , lirtal'. .. ilt%... .:•:* ' 1-,•• ' 4!""ifrASVOY . •-•-.. .?.- --"*.--t--- sir , 1.--gr-- -- t'!" ." I :;... ...dowit 1 4 , % IIITILIWigebro.. ----- -..... ....„r....•,.: , :7:4_,//,„v:\ ... -._ , . Iftk, . •F--zi,"." =--.-,:, • .. _... ..... , , . •7. ' 47,6, 4 ' 0.-.., - 1. . ...;......:::- * , .. _... -- ill ... . - - 'PRLPARLD FOR(i,• . DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 3.7 WASHINGTON AVENUE-DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET Currently.Washington Avenue has two 121 12 ft sidewalks.two 12)hi-directional travel lanes.a median/turning lane and on street parking on both directions and hike lanes. The Washington Avenue tong term plan is envisioned as a high level design that accommodates mobility and that shows potential feasibility.The intention is that from the existing cross section of the road.replace one side of the existing parking and part of the median with the dedicated new bus lane throughout the entire CO corridor. The proposal intends to have dedicated bus lanes in the muddle of the street with either bus stations. median/landscaping. or left turn lanes. that can he used as needed strategically along the corridor.It is important to note that the stop locations indicated in the drawings Isee figure 151 are not intended to show proposed locations on every block but rather to illustrate ideas of how they can he located as near side or far side stops and what the design might look like. Outside of those.there would be one through lane and protected raised cycle track on both sides of the street in separate directions.This would only leave curbside usage on the East side of the street,which includes on street parking,loading zone.ride share spaces.and pickup/drop off/ones. I Aron)vISION Pt AN.CITY Of MIAMI RE AM DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I WASHINGTON AVENUE 3.7.1 DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET LONG TERM VISION: Existing ' Ilf414' i% Tiff *11.16. so% ao°r• r1 - - 1 I rt - ia� • >I • + I �� I ,1 ►1 .1 . l� i • . �; TES . ►TIJ . . _, , I / CD BIKE PARK AUTO MEDIAN/ AUTO PARK BIKE BIKE AUTO TRANSIT TRANSIT AUTO PARK BIKE 8' 10' 10' TURN 10' 8' 8' 8' 10' 12' 12' 10' 7' 7' IIi 1 0 Proposed ,:wr Ira ) 14, `° Q d t j i' r A ii t . i 77,, 0"; © � .•. ±- i8 • cn iii , 4, lb I lL..1 Existing-Result of the Pilot Project Proposed DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I WASHINGTON AVENUE �N 3.7.2 DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET-EXISTING CONDITIONS lir . ir, ii 7 41* V. .„..„4 ,,,i: 41114110't;Illir \..... -,.. _. _ ..... .=. . w 0,0 wr1 -4,-* co"' i� lrkirtgo = �■ IQLI�_I Illr• I. qt.' t ... .4111111MPOPIIISItak. it101 iir ...qv, o ..... II. i EXISTING 2 all I Ili ' al a u • fiii,d1 1 „olio -14/fat_ k I • -;1144/441 . _t_ • ISA if ,...... : - -7:,. 131" g , , F Pir rrIr=elti.. . I Aix II VISION PI AN.(IIY ill MIAMI Ilf A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 02.142022 Oil OW 46 om All- Ar Lip ow 101010 man* DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I WASHINGTON AVENUE 3.7.3 DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET-LONG TERM VISION N 1 et " :Ili s 7411r. IF ell i iirA iii1) e .�#.•" ' .. ,�• INN . #1, ';4 11 •. • 1 4,10 tat) tom) �.�. �. 1r. am its _� 4- r+ ,.— 1 DEDICATED TRAN {T Via;;-�._..�-. r� -* _ 6. • arm •4M', = DEDICATED TRAy51�-', y-`- WASHINGTON ME = .I) "`alt5 _. ♦ ammo - run 'try irl omm... i t:I _ DROP OFF s OADING 1'I♦ ( ] MINI DROP OFF 1 I r �00all o ellkill* PROPOSED _, I 9 ....qt.- NIA r , ! 1 1 "" •tea. � • \ t. . �A� . 1 t . . s ..•. ��.. LI � 1 1 - t . V ' i ‘ i -' '' .... V---Q,:.., 1 ..„.. . 1 '' . TX *•••• NACTO:Dedicated Median Bus Lanes 1 `,i a I1 blSnr`v 41 v'. (ITV U1 MIAMI lif A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 .1. , 3 • '. • ritl$'It.' • . • , • ' - It .igil/4'.`'1;:*,.A.--- ''.-S A.-• r 444:*.41,...t •ni $4.:::41. .:.!4:), 1 . ,,,.• e . .....---° ''''''''' ofts, ° • ...4.,..'. 0;e::-!,-.,..,„ ,..; -- -^il Er".:.•:..•':04:!4.' 11114i;..:Er7.4:- i:;:4. „NI* ...6 ,fif . rek ' ', ' ';‘. "..0*". "-• ... ' • .), lc, ,, ...-... ...,.7.-..r.:,,V. 44 • - 1.• \•,,,.,,„; IP' io„-tv ; "1. ,, ' ' .• , .: .',N.; Ar ' - •(01' 5... ' ' 1. V''.':*t"•••.' ., .b...*‘,.. 9. .'‘ "t"' ' r'..-:.: t'' *..2; . k'i V.j' - . -4.$.i' '' . .44,..., — •,,A.--*-,:4" '' . 4 • • • ....• . '4.., ' v.' '1A4k..i - . .• • lir:.)::-,.•-'4.,t. .."''.,,' * irk : p 4.4-7,"=„4'.• . il. _,.. -,, t . 7..•.....,;1411,1 .r...t4 •.,,, 144......:....e k."."-- I\s .*?..'n''1 "Vitiki...: ... ..,;,.. - -.1. "rlit . -42-.„1„‘ ' ....^41001! 4 :. n• '' If • .r*-*:'‘'k.k :. ; : ( .} 7. Ai 7' ',.:17'31 : ' . , or i',.. • - . ; -.4',sio, . 4.• .. , .t.,41,.. . .,„„lb. „ , . , . .• A ' ' ".1 ,:t.. -'... ,' ''•' j„ ,,,,''.''. :,'• ': ,., or •). . .. 7."1 14". . _ , „ .14 4. . 1`, .'• •_. .1 k J. ...‘‘., ..,,, , , 4i,„ „ , -, .. t ,„.: .713 •, 1, igjOky" 41 •: b . 1• 4-, ..'e ....,:. _ .,.., .o........; :, •‘,.„.. = I. ..1 h • ,. ..-- / - 1. - , - - • . '': ,,,,i/ii 12 - „,:sic.E.J'"4“: ,,, , W - •• -..-' • .. : 41 1 . 4 .:—. '' t 4 {'. "` St C '. i 11' , . . I f ',",. 1 , 1 •f, 4 4 i i 1 L " , • - • • • e , ... ,, t win& ' 1. i - t I or ...s. .,' 6 i- ;,:-.,.. '--:-.. ,., ' • 4 v ._ c f-4 -7 .-LtA4APP;fIIIIIIII „ , 1_ amwt, _ - )9 44.1 i . 1 / --.tefalt gi- J 1 ‘.• lk*- ', 4 i /.. •. . 4,44,41.4 -.-.41414/114b,.. • OF F '.4111"I'r ................. t‘"M. IIIIF'''* altigift• .. k '. . _ ._ e •' --4I Proposed Strr, ' - _ .• -. ,,, — -•iire -—,- _4..• Ay, • . •lik• i: OaP••••1 S.:."',Int& .' •....„,' 1. • -.. IIr • '.,,e f.....1 • ..t..*1'1'•"'• : . 1%' • .1,, • rifii,: .,..., - . . "'" :.-:'^•• •-•.. '''• -. ; '-' '!?• % 41:4 0, 4":1.-; ''''' VW' --...op./11.11111 r. i ...... ..Zill - . .i.IL, '1;4. , s''''• . '`its 2::-., -". A'. •!r, . 7 . • . -.441Wiff* 6,,t.4 sii. VS . 4, :,:o• „ -:. .., `' ...-,4,.:- ....,..isp ., .. , ..... _„„, ....,._......; . -.. - .....- . .. ,• •. , !..1_, 4 •' q 4 0 ,'•• ' - k- - — . . - •141' '-'11.4, ....i ... ° •,.s. -. •;t4Or 17...-.1 -4 1111W ' — .........._ di,,t • , 111.... , . ..,* •• - . . •t- _...........- , •-. - • 0 . . -..4- :,,s•-...iiir;* ': 'elcr'''..1 ' ......... '41101. • `i" - is St . oi "ow_„,„..,,,,•• -.AIN 21.- .... • -_ . cl MG ;MI.;J„..-• . li . , . .111:•. ..e '' ' : '4... ji -..," '•-:*''..:, . ....eisir-Jir apr_. ,...:-. 12.... • -_ Al• t.'1. ....'' ..' -. ile.._.•#...„ow-' ,iik . .. arearrarim i .2 - - - ' —,..- - '. arg•-• . 11... •• • .. , •-• ..?, .: - • 7 r ..„;,..-7„-.. """"1111!' Ibtfop...- 1 .. , . 4111104' . ,iii..: .,. • • :.*: ,... 1 . .,,....!**, ,.. wit,. ._ :_ ..„,1 . 1. •k• t.:4. 1 : ''''.,.."... ''' ....„ . — , •' • i 1 , .0w • .' ' -- '• — • A. ,4,444'. -- • .1 • •*••• ••-••.A. ....: ,. '-'-' ."- .01 illhi:.pi ••.... 4. • or..-_. '•. ..,. ' ' .•im.r.--, , r.. .., -. • . . 1 . . ...)i. ,,, .Ifs. _ "isii -. , . k. • , - . s• ! - :-....L.;,- _ :41,,ii, '‘. .. ' 1 li • '• 44 ii. AI '0 OW •• • r T IR Vag& . . - r .. cit .. • :....„...._........,„ .....,.........„ ,.? #\ • ....----. ' . - . .....4„..:::.8„•..47...._ ,, . .•... .„;-.4„• jor. ,-.MP, . = . •si)t-'to,. N••.‘••t° -. .. ,,,.. -A. 114. .., ' — .- 0.4" '': '—'4.311111..::;1 Ainuro:Ant 1 • -...,.-..:-.7r1 --,V''''' ' ..... _ 4 ..e,"1"..7 . .. --..... . -.... .• 1: • ... r ..0•_i-Or-411* .014- . ' 1?'4* -. •; ....111Pw .a"' . . 40.0........... -.al I -_ • "-"" oil r - -111 s. ,.. SI .T # --QM\ ' .., • *Z‘.4.'4' v•,: . Oft:''.••..,. Si-4' 'r' •4.-4-x, • . _Ai..., .----- 7-:-.7.-eN. _., - . •LF5Plc..•, ' ..•••'' •.>2•:::. 1 , It t Ili S or . --- ....C. • , . ri4witY, 1 0 I 9 oad .p.i ''‘,Pr -••' '1.• • : iit ' .0e ' • ' i • VV• . •It0A -- ii, . . i t . • • i , r 0.1 1,.,.. 7 ..,,,D , . , , . . ioza Ira ' - er .• • • ta ,._ . ,.. ili -f.... - k .,:. • .. , . , • ..; . , . 4:k• • , . . .01 .. , 4,. ' . . ity; ,.,• ir f ' ' • 111;g? • 411 . • I,. • ' , Illniii -- )4-•.40,4 is i 1 ' • e is. , 1 if• '••-it, .,.,- Ill ° ,} , . . • - ''..... : . . -. ' • - ' -I ' - WO ill , . I . Mr-i .. ' - ... 0 -1. _ -- i • ".., •.. S". .., • ., 1 ---,•_.• "" • ' '1 ft.. ..' !:i• • . P" 4.V" •.‘ q -.;!..-' - . ....4,4 - .., •L. pii, ;,..t, ,A*,1 i, .„,, , 4' 4.: 8 ... .•.- f — 1 11::— ..asi:;voia., .. .... . ,. .r. ...,., 4).,..: ,... .--. , ,,.Vt. -*, - . i 1116-•.- 1 ..._..... r 114.. . • J• 1 • ' 116 •••••• 0 •/• IN ‘ .- 0 ._t_11111 k. lir , I 41, •••-•• — •... i ••• 4 - 1:, 4 , • 4 - r . , ,k., . r • ....:0415F. 41111. .''°- Altril jr a13 Z.' ` ° - .-• i i • r ,4 • g r-•• . 11•1 - illiilir , • 1 il: 41 WI, I i I t 1•••• ilkt• I if• •i• , •fi•3,1 t,, ,.... !• - r V- . . 1. i ,- , g- . .. • .,_, -.i ,• ,)T 1. ;10 ' . eh .- st.---4, . : ' • lit.•• L I ' • r. I .. 7 . I 1 ‘ 1 , . 1 0 A . ' ,... • i •••••••••••..... . djkAA. 1 , ' , 1 - ' '. i i MP - - - . -• 1 1 1 .111.1.'s Ai........„••-'' . ,—- - A - -- - .:?--- '' -- , ... .... - .. -- .. _ ..., _. ...i0 e •••••• e I S'4 1 _..... • 0' •••- . '4 - , jijii, ....„„. i 1 i ' ....., ___ DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 b► . a "A 1 r--,4- Amg"Wiiij _ I" 1 _ ,,. , --,-.. 17.4, •• I',mr.i..!1 .. ...fr4 wi,..y.....J. Jilt:- a 'il 1.4,-?-- .., 44,---k--7-14 j '',. *kit%7j.,,,..(::A......."7:ML -4i.;"' it . \ .. .v,oistotleit, ' • � K �.�r ;r` . f Jed• I, 't k,..j,tl► � �•uzuz.ir', �t +�Wr ► �1 �?'E► , r it, iota: . , • -7, , t �� l e �... ,_ �•- �" \ 1111 . `� �� ' ` ru +7 O/ s,M s/�e�r _.'_ll/ f • -, , • /l�yiu i1 ■ 44440 i& 3 -1...� e I f NI ,. R 4 x I vii .. .,- i?f .4 .r , rho ♦ — - s `t +.., tt .-.'1'.V,'S,-'1'1...-..,\1\.:i i d ,, _ _ � 1 _D -.r' w '*•' 1 COLLINS AVE 'i• et. ` , LINOOLN Rp f OCEAN OR �• . J , . ,,.�,.,,.• n .-_ 1 ` S. 1 - .-t _ -i •o .. ..._ I 1 i W.a 'gip... ..,. t yp` NIPPY AirerNeitirqpir .,''4"-- .-- ..-"i* :I' r - i -, • . 1 . s.. ..ilk._ 711111 ' 1\r "%i--it,-. --; le'''fil, Z. .dr .ise..10 --16-.4 -. 1/...:. - ...- j . kilf. -,, „ ,f i r - --: , ia.- „. - v __ 1 • f .. rye• - PREPARED FOR U MMMLBEACH by 115UosUCF1 1 Z01 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 ' 1 I I 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION - OPTION 1 i 3.8.1 END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL BETWEEN LENOX AVE AND MICHIGAN AVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS Ai7. - - MI , ' killik- *. .411* . , I 1 T I '•,� • - A: .-. Am • ' II.' fl - - - - - - - tit of f BIKE AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO MEDIAN AUTO AUTO AUTO BIKE r�=t1 N 5' 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5' 15.5' 10.5 105 105 5' IIIIIIIIEIIIMEBD ( T..• C) PP- d i AIIMMIIIIIIIIL 1Illlllllllllllli _ R aR = - • - • a 5TH ST •.. 4,, .- -- - --S ��— �— — — -- r Illllllllllll I -nn Z 1 I 1 V w 1 IUCI)VIfli IN PI AN.I I I1 OF MIAMI III A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 .- ..-.- . I 4 This option proposes to bring the high capacity transit connection IThe Beach Corridor) to the intersection of Lenox Avenue and Michigan Avenue,which is where the County has i currently proposed /41111/.. -• 1 t ' ' f / I ' ,-- 4 . ......... •-'•• - 1 . '• ,. ,- ' . .".."-'7""' ....: • !ir ...- ' *****"..................."... , -.,‘*4.,V ...9., -;::;... ,' 44S. .... ••••, . ; ... . ..: 1.1 !"C".10111110.1.11°';•:-/ .1‘‘,.• . - -,:----"4"'-'*- .: A , . ‘ • . .i,.,' • . . 7-....112116 . e, --• .1tpe- . ., . : .. .. . ., ., _ . 4 ' .4 .144k . . • *Vi •. 1 _, • , d .. ••••162r 40,- `01P ..../' a .4. `` Lenox ., .. ;;.--- W-,,or,,,,,,s,,„„ 4%;,,. . , •.,. .-:-......,...i;.• 40,.;,•-•,...;...:,--- .,= • __ .,.. .--4, -.,,,•,..,„,. .r.=.0:. , .1.,,,. . . 44b 4 4 . • -....., , , ... . .,„.. .. .. 41. . ... .... •.••- I. . . i. .,.„,.,,,, • •, . . ... 11..6,..,....4, _„a•lb.,. ,.m.i.%t.r...,•f,. - irt4", • • . . 0• p . •• . ,.- •. 7' f:0 114. .., l 111 + „. " ug i /DO NOI f.1- ••• - ii SLOCK . . '\-' ..... ..i-. -.tr..: '111 .•c.r.• • • IL...., : • , . 446. ._. 1 lin •: ;LIT:s I • -- - • ig I - , NE . ' 4 .6 • :_ To...n:' '-'111111 ii"b1:111/1rttr."-- . _ . t " , IS ,.._.i 10 I ./ : i -'.;. , )1111 ...... li) • AM,....... .EMMONNIMIIN • -- '1.111..116 .°111111111.1.1 .... .... .41116,‘"t• •_____ — ,—. _ *J."- . .... .... DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 ....---- / i i I 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION - OPTION 1 ;j 3.8.2 END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL BETWEEN LENOX AVE AND MICHIGAN AVE- PROPOSED Amil* III l,:i - *11111h' km. I j / i 41iikirtna I / r """ ,,m.' ri ,L, (�l i �_ eatL BIKE TRANSIT AUTO AUTO AUTO MONORAIL STATION AUTO AUTO AUTO TRANSIT BIKE lt n ....1 STOP STOP 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 29'+/- 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 12 8' 11103 N CO ► .J 1 I IlilllllllllI' _ _-- _ _ _ _ _ ; 1III IIIIII Nno rN' ...4..4•, —Il 1 I-A 1.Z_I_1...r...l..L.{ / I /7 7 7-/ r 7 7 LT�pT-r-� — �..i I r r -._ -.. .- __---.. _ -- -7TTl --_�7 -. ---------.... -- �- ." �.. •ar .__ 5TH ST — — — • ♦ i• — :• — — — r — — ♦ — • .— — — — ' MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL STATION .► iU ---- - - ---------- - - =c�a--r: - 8� K , W ... — ir JP_Ll-._ism • I_JWZZrrslllrr r.7t_irzt7- rlt = w IIIII'IIIIIIIIII K W I III 0 II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 / i—I L4 , _ .,....., _. , . ,....,,,,,,,„.., ,,,„... .,,...,. 4, Ir.i13409 ....„ .11 _ • _ - _ �` w e 1:. r -.. (1 .., Lenox r ___ ___ _.__ _____ . . ; • _ tt II �, t 4 1110 f 1 4 w Art :' 11h ll'. 1Ll1 00 NOT 1� r _ + BLOCK sr. a,11S(i!KN . I\\i . . Joi 1 I • \ i . \ \ 1 !il ' i 1 II . iiirlmel*,::''. .1-.6.,.-j,_ ,11P iii 4 i . 1r. . , A f .41 n Proposed DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14 2022 / / 1 I I i I 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION - OPTION 2 3.8.3 EXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL BETWEEN WASHINGTON AVE AND COLLINS AVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS AIM *11.* .*Ib: .411‘41 . 1 t i . t ra 1 / 141. 117 i 1 NM. sin � - - - -- - - - 1 I , BIKE AUTO AUTO AUTO • AUTO STRIPES AUTO AUTO BIK7 414‘ t}t*1 N 5' 10.5' 10.5' 105 10.5 10 10 5 1U 5' 5' N O f .. ,; w II al• •: old 2 F I (31111/ ' 4 I id• — - - ,/ll - ' - - iriVi". — •- -5TH$f ''''''' - - ) - i alhh, t Nb • I,. 110 aniirl i I I 1 I l'' It'. gimillime • , W., .y , . ,,„,,,, I`auti 1'1 AN,(I I v U! MIAMI III A(II DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 -/ The basis for this proposal is to bring the high capacity transit connection(The Beach closer to the beach it restricts down to two 121 travel lanes in each direction and as it Corridor)to the intersection of 5th Street and Washington Avenue.so that it is near the approaches Ocean Drive it becomes one 111 travel lane.This may be part of the reason for beach access and activity areas of the District.It would also be the area where we start to the congestion and difficulties in that zone. implement the restricted vehicles access. .�1•f. Figure 16 shows the intersection of 5th Street and Washington Avenue.which currently has three i31 lanes of travel in each direction on 5th Street at Washington.and as it gets i 4' • f .aq 1 *Otte `7 lltab --: as., • ;.0111.•i 'ill .i �`'t' �4 {' II i n tonAv,t , i � 4/ . 1= � r. . .wr , � C w Lji ' • Ti,' ' 4- y, ,•.. it p , I1 ti ' ,J • *- * i �. 111 .i r i 1 g. 3 /44 , ....- ye w.- r.. Ok IIIP Existing L , DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 - 1 I 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION - OPTION 2 3.8.4 EXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL BETWEEN WASHINGTON AVE AND COLLINS AVE- PROPOSED ANL- aliallismagNigliglialgi ..;;41 :1.hib' la ‘: D a '4.1', 11-• ,-.: I... WIL .0.... . 1 I I wr • • M il BIKE AUTO MONORAIL STATION AUTO TRANSIT BIKE 4 14111 $ttitti N 1 8' 15' 28.5'./- 15' 12' 8' jT'�� ..� �, (1 IN 'a 1 i iti 1 II Alb CO CD ' J z J PSNor.„ I X ..., I,........___..... _ _...AP, 4'r_z--r2!:="7-1---r "" s _ _ r-_ Jam_ .� 4 1 �j1� *` Z47- _ _- �.....' __"- "- It, DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 /� i In anticipation of the monorail.it is proposed to have the intersection of 5th Street and Washington Avenue as the location where free moving traffic begins to be limited and from this point of entrance into the district the restricted access zone starts with a single lane of travel.as the blue pattern shows in figure 17.In the long term.the median is the y�i� _ monorail station and the idea of the circulator that goes north on Collins.would have a III transfer station in this intersection. 7, 4 a, A ;0. NIN . ' • _ w tttttt���� ••� et 0 r 1. • II t i ii ; • r, t! r► '..:40 A RESTRICTED BLOCN �' N r ACCESS AREA � ,�., a •- • ;'t.2.r.7111, • ir -t a "�„' , r \.71-'7-4-1 _ r. ► N-fit14 tr. , Ile p t _. olorai ( • I`� " �� p i.: • 0 I "+ 1:1 \ t 1...i I /141 iill 1 tl , / 1, , . -,- ., :, V j . . II i i e . , . . . 0 i .r--••••.. NIB i. - a. >! air OP.� 1 -- �� ill, Proposed O��O� - `,- ....- DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 //- I 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA 3.8.5 TRANSIT PLAZA: VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE- EXISTING CONDITIONS N 0 • n V Ji t' . I r,; 1 � r : ,f, i1 14; . , . -- ./I .... / - , -,--r- 1 J .- . 11. /ii N I 111/11 ; d .. , i 1 I ,.� i, t / -- illim. SECTION 1 ► SECTION 2 P SECTION 3 ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C [Existing] [Existing] [Existing] •3 lanes westbound •3 lanes and 1 turning lane westbound •2 lanes+ 1 turning lane westbound •2 lanes and 2 turning lanes eastbound •2 lanes and 1 turning lane eastbound •2 lanes eastbound •Bike lanes each direction •Bike lanes each direction •NO Bike lanes 1 aUrll Vl,li)A IA AN.(II',01 AUAMI Ill A(ll DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 During the interim condition,even without the transit in place.this/one can still become a limited vehicular access lone. `s, ate` p . ., ,.: 's''' ,ik:,.. . ' ''.f i. . _ _______ .•;.001,-.1 . i INII .011 , • il. . j ' - 'h Washington Av ,, �,� qj _ r""ter. • 1 kir; VIII i ,� I .,� t 5ii.el- ,. , •fi , P AIL,:4 4.14, „.,_,... .......... . ,... .... 1.4 _ . ---- " 3M z- 6:1 .. _ .... ! it �i MI r ... t T Existing • DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 i . I 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA 3.8.6 TRANSIT PLAZA:VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE-PROPOSED N O r I xL a w, L. . If Ns -' 1 t at 1-- . 1 i vi' iv r C9 i ,!.4" 11101114; `a V N -~.. rr.czar r.r-zz-z>rrr_rs:r'rri�,./ _r?1 rrssas rrrt.rarsicszzr_. ,,�,m.. m.. _ . r.a. •• r--- ' 5T 1 St a. - J y r ..• xz :sr s. r J ._..ems -- _- +6`°' -y ♦ a J; _ x _ _ 4,----1 � Air ._ - ■sc.._ .. a "7 �\ "tad a ,.' Alt• • rigors 1! ' - .7'. , ta ► SECTION ► SECTION 2 ► SECTION 3 ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C I E xishngl (Existing] I Exrstingl •.3 lanes westbound +1 lane and 1 turning lane westbound • I lane westbound r 2 lanes and 2 turning lanes eastbound •1 lane and 1 turning lane eastbound •1.lane eastbound .Bike lanes each direction 4 Circulator stop eastbound 4 Bike lanes each direction •Bike lanes each direction i I Al III)VISION PI AN CI I Y 1)t MIAMI BE Atli DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Maintaining the median hut reducing the number of travel lanes from two 121 lanes to one I 1 lane and adding hike lanes with buffer on each direction and a circulator stop on the eastbound.as seen in figure 18. �►t/a, r k z ti•; R •� f 1. •II {1►•� `' • ' At I .,- a is WAIF:.v. } r , , ...,,,.. t Z 4.:1 t.,,i-,. ,,,•...tcA,t.;.':.,,,., .,,,',.s:,:' ::.4e' 7., t ,r err. t' �! � ,,i+� r ,. • ..lAt 4111 ,... ' r':. r. •4 .6_ ,,,,,o. • ' N _ s `aii.l :':...- - .. r `�� III ( RESTRICTED I •� ...li '''..:•.,:A,,.,': - • ""1��_ *ACCESS AREA ��� a , "".".""1"1- 11--"64". -' i ° $ çi , . I Ott" A •' • 111101 id . i i 44 .. ‘.. u , i . . _ t 1 12.! ' a ' I li 1 ; . .. ..41.....I.. 4 i : vg y 141 ,, ,ts ei. ... y , A 1 kik ..., ; . . I (to w w_� �c — T •t i . : ! ..., db.. ; itii . rillij, l' t ,_J oNS-NC .I',' ' -• V.�r •�. w .... --walk. ` I r,�7 1 Proposed A. nStc DRAFT REPORT#4 —02.14.2022 / ' 74-.* Ail I k, I .w I 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA L — iA '1-110e1 1. "'.""~ 11 3.8.7 TRANSIT PLAZA:VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE SECTIONS I r° ,rw.,,. I� �` w, „ 4„ M 411i11. i i. SECTION 1 ST`TION I 91(gilh' Ad* - * . fg.b.- 'aii41 N BIKE AUTO AUTO AUTO MEDIAN AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO BIKE + .' '' a+ s , BIKE AUTO AUTO AUTO Ilia AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO BIKE b 1' CO 5' 10.5 10.5 10.5' il' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 5' �.A t, ,,,. 4. B' 9.5' 9.5' 9.5' 10' 10' 9.5' 9.5' B' :,.,,, ,« rto.,,,r, . � h � I I wilt I` 1 I[ : 1 � i I rill I I " *. 11 I � I^ I 1 VA & i I I 4 rt i oi. R4 $ y m taJ ok) •.;. I I I I I i I I I Existing Proposed sifts Proposed ffttfi B0% 50 i v1 a-n‘(SWN Pi AN (IIY f)( Mi.'MI Ill.'(fl DRAFT REPORT #4 -02,14.2022 f I 1 . 41. rsK ti .a Ir , .y f � (i s is s a 4f .+raN' 144 f u ,a.- • : «, A._101r1 ,eit^i a 4, I*' i il LarilL" ' ' '.' 1. SECTION 2 '. kimb- iriCa-. '.. ik ,...,440. r--"I ...olik iiii N :IhF AUTO AUTO AUTO ,, AUTO STRIPES AUTO AUTO - BIKE AUTO MEDIAN AUTO AUTO TRANSIT ENKE (Q 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' la 10.5' 10' 10.5' 10.5' 5' 8' 15 13 10.5 15' 12' 8' • '... r I4 ' I jr‘tioriri 0 ill t. � 1 . w cf1415 1 �— f. x 41-4 �► I afar Okl AO I = '« TRAM +. 1 Olii IIli I I �, Existing w ?1 1 1 T Proposed tirti F 11% 50% Mark DRAFT REPORT#4 -42.14 2022 . ..,... . , .0 i I " . .. ,, , . --- I 447. , j I 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA i 4 t. 4 -4 **.‘" -i *.titki **** ) . „, - - -.4.1v301", . ., ', Nt . ,. 3.8.7 TRANSIT PLAZA:VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE SECTIONS ."*"` ' r ....,,/ i , .. (CONTINUATION) ' */ isii. • • • , - - - Ill SECTION 3 SECTION. 1 - - _ • • • . '' II f 1T . _ C.P3 Al.,10 A1.1 AUTO al AUTO AUTO NO AUTO E DA. 105 105 i 10.5' 10 5 ','40.,.:'', .; :",-'",:':: ''``..:' 8' 15' I Am 3:. i f• , 1 0 . .,. . I . -..„, .101-1k 1 I ... . iiik 11 li ,* an .1 I I --- • ' • I , . ... . .. . . 1 ki ket (il71 1 . . . ...., ...... .. . _. • : SS AI:4 .0 .111jr lb 1• Existing 4‘0.--- ittfil Proposed „ MEL 11111111= . •• 11 0()VI',i()N PI AN 000 t OF 111AMI II)A(f) DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 PAGE LEFT INTENTIONAL IV Bl ANK W DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT 3.8.8 TRANSI I MALL:TRANSFER STATION-EXISTING CONDITIONS '‘ ilialb- *lbw 'ailli* AUTO AUTO EDIA AUTO AUTO 4"^"' .' tttti n 11' 11' 9 11 11' (i ) ca.) .- 71 w4 IV _ I a 111 A a t f a. ,:t. iiii . - , c7r]��� ; = L.INCO RD IIIIMMI 1i .... e �� III �1111 �. �"! �� .i. a .. ..,; v. t, i t •• g I/ i c Q I �+3 6. SECTION 1 AI I(U 41'.IUN 1'I AN.(.I I Y(A MIAMI IA 411 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Located on Lincoln Road between Washington Avenue and Collins Avenue.which is the Northern area of the district.It is proposed to have transit only lanes transit mall)and the transfer station in the center of the street with through lanes on each side.as seen in figure 19. .v T it -,.. .-, : 4,4 N. - . . #,i) .,• iiiiii;eilkle p" Sri • .� r' vti ? .. kP,i 1S •a �• ,. ,Wu., A .. • r W ?'.. 1 .. •1110, ' P ! fr,i.- ,,�,� . 4 i ..1 i �• spMill. r t,..-.....pyMiii r ` j \\\4 lir V g•. I3•'•' __._, _'.. t ...... , /-- It ..._ ___1 ,,,, . . . , _. ' •A )b ti . , ?�1 • t - • I -P-,. PREPARED FOR CITY 0f MIAMI BEACH FlY IY5CovtCH I 119 DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT 3.8.9 TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION -PROPOSED 11,C1°- ..-: 1 1 Milli 1.11 I am AUTO TRANSIT TRANSIT AUTO 4 T?T n n 11 ivi l' 11' 80% SO% ( i , i S . • Puff 1 ♦ tisift** lik . *ilk' i �� '' {�i L--. ,•-• -.-- . •• 44 43W 1**" Oft4. i gret Illk •$ : 1111 11113 lir t> •• III' Ak 404 L SIR Figure 19 >; - -• "E '�' SECTION 1 I nIK'O VISION PI AN.(IIY 01 MIAMI RI ACH DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 WOONERF + NEW BUS HUB AT LINCOLN ROAD. WASHINGTON AVE_ . .„ _ , . , ,,,,,,e4 - MININION"'"' ., .4,. ' 00 boo .s., . ,„ .. ..., 4 A •,. • .. . „.. ... -. •'•• '• ) .•• '# , ' 1, II, .14,L \ , pv ii,,,,' .i„4-; '! ,0 . ,f.,;/„ - iek ' ‘ ''p ..,/,'" .. .,i _ ,..........- , , 'A*"tk • \ • , iii.,-9t, - --- ••; '',. ';‘, 4 . -',-Y'f. . -,.. "IL* •-•",„i . . ,; ., ... _ _ -,, . • , .-, ,,,'•'•'' •" ' ' # It * '7 , ot . , :...‘ t v - .. .. • . , ' w • ,,,‘*,..,N. . ' 4.' ''i 1: #k.,, -4 ..... , .o. *. ! -.. - - . ..-- ii, t. . • , ': kli •-•-•,* ' • •\< - • •-' *- ' .1 )11, •' II 44*..; ,4 , - _ "-. .: ,i.. ,,.. • ,,,, , . 14 It 4,5 . . .,, , ,..4#k iv — ... •7 0. ' : T .." , , a. Sc,•_ ,:44''': . .,?.." ..4. ..,. 1,,., , . .4 ....' y it , ,..., 1,'.... t ..,-.--`. ;. *•• or.% - ---. -,-. imi N . ' .-•&•••..... :.:..4....:,. ..,, ,' .',.-7.4. ,:: ' .r..4.•. ' . .. '4. '4' •• 1 I •••"'". I 1 .-- ; r .. %4 * • L . ;#4•1 ,''''• L'';'t ...'.•I•••'C..-•• #.•' ik •e-• ..P 4.4 I.i%. ‘.•.• •'•*/ .. r...x. ,„; II _ .. i • { • 411111..r. Irr'"A. . 4.'. ' r, ;.A.,.li %. . —rr'.'*010;;,', ,,--c,C., ,,.`4 4" • ' 111:Y Z° N • .• i . 1 A 1 P. 4 1191311 , '.-- ' ' •4 -, •ffe..' '.4" • 1'4• '' t , I'if'I -› t 411•••- , ' - .tahk... • ,, ttr...... "k I 1 - it 01 ' ,a,10i/' ' -ks_':•4,! 1: ...'' ‘..• 4.t",:.!' ' ."'..%; I P ../i•• 2 yef 1 '' .--''' . \''14 • • •, . • "I V • t, '7 ''. ' '-•s ,.; , ••4 . it ' ' skr ki.11011111111116 ' ' ',Hilo/ •7-t•_,.:t: i';',;Ti. ''.1-q!''''i',I"?x. .:.-.4; ,.7 1 4- .. 4i*k ' '. '1''' ',..•"41.0! '*".7-- -''•'1 • . . . i ....• ...., k ii,k•• ' ."*- 1‘it.' - ntill l. . — ._ .. . _ ot .3 • I i • . , 1 f•---c.. , I i , I I I . • ' • 41111116 . I 10 16 , . .• • / * ... ". ' •4 p I ; ,, ki,•• k - L-- si*Iiiilli_... ' ' -464'4 " • .•is•-- 1 A %'k kk lk i / I imi A 1 a . . .,• ,.. 04 4,•• 1 ."'I , , • -..... - ......... 'II ----' ..' 4..k, - 11:.„., 4, ..‘ ' - '• "'"-'4"..'' -"01111111111••••• --• ..• . .. . . ' . . 90° „Oat: . .. ., .„, TO;i1.70-. seo• ...if DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT 3.8.10 TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION EXAMPLES- 16TH STREET MALL. DENVER -•.• ., ' r' . .4 A. I j ems"' 4, _ --- .. . . • t+• ( bliri :' tit j t ( -- �• r . IL . ,titir-- 111. . .. '. ,..4iv, ' 4-414,1m =nf.,' 1' . ', )1,11`, , , ,,,,, iiii... it , '• _ r.' i , 3 i 1 % . .... ....... f• ,�, •*kw ;4111111ma -,. e, . . : __. _• Ic. .. I ; i s !'',7,4t. I T ittetitilvi. 1 'itgill: ,flop, q 'A �r ♦ itr �TRtE t _ a J� Ali i, �: t: s rt MALL i _ ,,--iit: - ', i t''' 1 • 'fit �'; �• �` ,• 4 x\d• �.. --I '.., yfAti,I L% !� f • II! nglir _ • 6116,66. Itt 1,4 • ,• lii �� . , ' '� (-D .�4 ,.. r • '�. „.. _ y ilit:rt: i ; i.\ 11 6,e4f.*.!•••'‘..weit:. . . A , : iillaillifyirl--.441.11_ *ea PI 1.; '''4 419 '' ,61 :efit itle.ti.:-.,... - --..,; , . "", 7--__ 1 , di 1,4,....' ' '' 4p ki .' .-: Iiiiin, :4041r- . . , ; .-11.' 7,*-: .• hi,,, • , , , . . . , • . , ... 7 t piii �*. tn, •VISII N„1 9.1t. (ill of MIAMI III A(i I DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 PAGE MT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ri, ;;a,,,,,,, , 11,•.ai in v ie r, ,i I I>. ) `d I DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 e� ��1 i iill , 1 � ' .. , • .4.1 • ,... .... . „ .,..;,‘.._ 1 op • � ,� � - • I. :. slis P , .# . . • 4, j......., , il . . - :,---... I t. (,.. ir • 1 . •_ • . 1 . _ , • • ..,„,„„, 1 • •,, , - -4, •• •,. - •r...,,:,. .NS a .._ . , . . ..:f ra ''.' 3 . • . ...„ „.,. • l' III . t ,,i1.. • -- S ST , I' 4. 1447, . 1 . . 1 . . r ' ONE WAYS REElS ... . . . .. / . / . _ _ lif _i I.` , . la .11 Y �.' r s • _ - .-(iejt, . •-•114 - meii,...' . r. 3.4 !` u µNo ' 0. ?ark • M_ :44 ..lb/ Citi00.„......-#1•111111.1117"' ,.. .t.i I. ' ' ' 1 0 t ,v,-,,., . al 1 ..4:2•,••4,4 :itii• 101 e'' .:-.1..."1.•_I it.** ". • • &L.- . . •111111% • _,_�/� )��;. JAI. , ' _. •»w i 'R ,„-. . r , ti » DRAFT REPORT#4 0214.2022 OF - IWT dp AI i oil oil44 it Iffm smut ja lam ST .1f .— ,L. LINCOLN RD COLLINS AVE OCEA N DR PRLPARED FOR(A ~.~ DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 I EAST- WEST CONNECTIONS 3.9.1 TRAFFIC FLOW lc c Sj—pIAr%.;"'" =H�` ; ;—r/rrr— I e'f7 _ _ r'"" 1 r r'� I ,1 �' , '��rrrr Lrrr—r__ � •"..ARTFHOUSE �� 1 \ - O -------- '--- 1 1 1 ; 1 \ ... i. reii/s • A . Y • MIAMI BEACH ATTRACTIONS EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW a. '+ 4: :�E ppire 20 EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 The idea is to make these streets a bicycle/pedestrian priority street.so that they can One way street provide additional room for expanding one side of the sidewalk and improve walkablhty, livability,and environment in the area.The existing sidewalks are separated bike lanes.improving the landscape.prioritizing walking and hiking facilities. narrow and there is not enough room for landscaping.which could enhance the pedestrian and providing for loading zones and commercial vehicle circulation.and pick up/drop off/ experience. valet zones between Washington Avenue and Ocean Drive. II is pmposed to make the East West streets as one way pairs versus two way traffic. The City of Miami Beach is currently exploring alternatives for Espanola Way beyond the as seen in the existing and proposed East West traffic flow diagrams in figure 20 and existing two way configuration.but at the moment.this proposal recommends that an O figure 21. enhanced pedestrian character should be promoted for Espanola Way between Washington : Avenue and Collins Avenue while maintaining some traffic flow. __ __ �� W. I a. �1 1 —�.0� I ��'�� ', �� `r WOtFSONIAN I(x)KBtYi it % �ARTEHOUSE CINFMATHFOUf -- r Fit)MUSEUM AP,nttEut i:J;. J!! 4`JE i. r It , ir .- \I/P.: f uxr� r x t F. r 1 ..-. ...st: .,;:,., mah It I 1 r I L I i I((ilKBEYr)Nfi HIN.71!nj1ll'+ (1 1 `,lit ill. IHIA`!,P.II" AYn;RGOhii) Alit GAIIIFPY I i ,`•'.' A;:)1; .HI''If' • MIAMI BEACH ATTRACTIONS EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW - •"I`" Figure 21 PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 I EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS 3.9.2 TWO WAY VS ONE-WAY STREETS Existing iiiiiiiiN itti . PARK AUTO AUTO PARK BIKE AUTO SIDE N 7 9 7' 8' 10 7' Proposed „ 'II 1 li , : .iii iii CM it rI I III I tttttt1 • 0 aii ter i0 L, 00 , Existing Proposed AI,(D YISIUN V(AN (IIA or MIAk11 It!A(I1 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I EAST - WEST STREETS EXTENSION OF LUMMUS PARK 3.9.3 INTERSECTIONS CONCEPT ;7,.¢v) 1-cd4 cars (,- *Atu) it, `r MIL PI 1 . •014,-II, t.,..4 la 1 i _ _ s1r•.-rlc....r. .. uLbtLt +rwtl, ' ' i 1. , Vz � � .� r e , i I, , , ,i, , • M taie ... .i y Mtei: n � l s i4,4. . .,.., ir. � / y 1 • , A�•P1 �.'� i�0 4 ill , ���.,pr.-%s f 1111 I fig\ * \\\N It ....til• . \\\\\\\\\,,, ,,,.,..,*. ......:„_ ,..,..„.....„.„ ......... . ,. ... _ I DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS 3.9.4 TWO-WAY STREETS EXISTING CONDITIONS I 3 ti Or II A NI ill; MI b li —.! 10-.� iii. ; ` 04 lit *tie 1 . : ill iN, \is oft is 1 1 , ,, ilimmu :iiiiimilir4m*"° ' 6. �.. . I • - a s a i i; so; .kli 40:ii110. 7:-. Illp. \ A t \ '� >R F > r 4 k ` N SECTION 1 111111 L.,01 I 0I *4 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 The street section is proposed to be modified to maintain one side of the street as is including sidewalk.curb.gutter,and parking.but it widens the sidewalk.planting.and green areas next to the new bike lane and through lane.as seen on figure 22.From a design perspective,it can have elements that help dismcentivize car movements in the area and make people who are driving feel uncomfortable and prefer to walk.ride a bike. ... or take the circulator to arrive to these streets.The rendering in figure 23 shows what the 0) , fr potential cross section can look like. :i f. ,. S '! ` '�/ i/i1 ' l�y� ��,. r T,,, rl 'f ,, , 'Os 1010°*.. fig! t 'r�.� k' • x' .' �� ;rl•l f.��l"��{ � �i r �� r '`' �_ / `►1'11 /" F! , ' ff ' ! „• 111,.4. Alli-,, . ...7 , �R Y ` 1 ram * �$r'"Y• y• v't, .p �1 a . f ;;t'f`' '. C71 41 , ` , 1. r ti. S. rrir -1, ..„,.. . .,-44 . , ... 1 11111"‘ lb : b II • 'isv �" ■■ Isie ry r. aC 1 Jra .T 40 d • �lW,,,�y thy• rR t !` t • • I'q r .1hrlor it 4: dtik. , ; ;i.., •. 11 rs F • Y t g 0 Afr " ,\, ' 0°°°°°°..1. ''''' . ' 'J...., ., 'iii 1110 7 t...- ' .r L • • Alt zi5luif' �� DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS 3.9.5 ONE-WAY STREETS INTERIM CONDITION(PILOT PROJECT) Existing side of the street : One way street Existing curb and glitter.Painted t eft side bike lane improves motorists and as is including sidewalk.curb. i pavement for expanded sidewalk bicyclists visibility by having the bike lane on gutter,and parking. and temporary planting areas. the driver's Side and nummves dour mne z cnnfhrls �, tr II 1 ��CY "' 0 girl tt , 11 lit • 1 I l I I ' 7111111111... 4' • ,..,..i _4 • ri _ 1 ,... .• . ••• ` •. � I • ,.. „..., .ps z .7.1.. ,,, I" 4 - = .i 0 e •., IIIHIIIIIIIII0. ` “ . ' A. 3 Z F .Il.. . Olio 1 = li, ';46'CT.N.N.'CIVIC%t,I.‘;`,1t-"ID----et I ....... +MO tit 111114111 ,. , i it w ' -J ,l 0 Trot • >rif _Iiimimiiiiiimmin _as IF I I 11114 1`4 • ADM)VI:IOIN PI AN,(Iti Of MIAMI BEACH DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 The East West Connections Pilot Protect proposes the following elements to be •Bring a protected bike lane to the left side of the street. implemented •Establish a one way street traffic flow. • Expand one side of the sidewalk into the existing parking lane to make room for temporary planting areasAil .. ,„.41,', 441. , 77;7,, . ,, .• I 4 A ' '. 1.4' ,i. ., -re ,. : . 'ipi:i \ 1... , ,, • . .illir .. ii; ,.1,, , . - . i : I . 'krt.-, . ..., de ( ' P , 1 • IN r. \, i II '%.,lizt 4014,,, it' 1,k ....;.. ,,... „ii: ,i . .. . , .1 .. • , . .:.-0.4.. ,'',A4k144fi'' '::.- . • ... ei/1 , 41,.4 )111%111:41. 4. 1 !iir,ii , • .. ° '- V �.. y •< 1 'lam �..: , itit., ..- - ,A--"*" • / ,A I a -- < -me '-r NI lit'--. N — A. -, i:- - _..,.i.... „.... ..,, ,...,.,. 7... . ilk ,,,-. ...• -.6.!,....-, iii.:: :, ...• , ,,,,,,_ ., , .. ..._ ., ,,,,,;..., ., • ., . ., / ill - Ir1.4 . . i. i -•:.• Illic ONE WAY ' •.7 ►''•.'Ziv- �.M:•f ,• t.• - --1 N , `'• r. M t i "•. ••labigaM•a...!,...hpegr41—"at F �1 �N 7:4111111P" ‘t_. .• . y.< } . f 1 -.14, - .-1,4 , !c I 1.4 �►" 4 \— • i f DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I EAST — WEST CONNECTIONS — OPTION 1 3.9.6 PROPOSED ONE-WAY STREETS LIMITED VEHICLE ACCESS EXTENDS TO OCEAN DR Beginning of Restricted Wider turning radiuS Valet/one i One way street Loading/one with Wider sidewalks allows Drop off/one I ell side hike lane improves mom,ists and Zone for access to alley time restrictions for planting areas hi,vi lists .isihildy by having lie hike l int'orl N the r h rvrrs ckle;out •,rivet dery/•nir Cn t milli(Is f { I I * 4• wi ,� � . il III. • it I + � !fi t 411 ! 4 Mt I . lib lib HIM C --- - • , . '' .1......... i- / mr. i►- �. .dais.�.444.411444.4411144.44. • f 7G71 1 `, • Loa r'fig Ir —_ At ; ;000of ., ) 9 + I II I. • MN i . � . illlilllll i ! •or 40 . 4 3 ': iT i IIIIII IIIIIII4".."..I.-# I i` 1,../e- . • . , . ,,, . .. ,. .,, . . . • I ► SECTION 1 ' ' 1/11° -4'4 ..; ' I to . 6 a. - A . . _ : . , r__; t rA • r 1t/ Login 2? DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 • The one-way streets extend to Ocean Drive.which is proposed • On streets with direction going East. loading with time It)be a low capacity limited access road. restrictions occurs at the West end of the street. This would allow trucks to access/exit the area turning left or right on Collins •On streets with direction going East,valet/drop off zones occur Avenue. avoiding the narrow Ocean Court alleyway. but also At the Southwest corner of Collins Avenue probably impacting the traffic load on Collins Avenue. /�' • f• . ,r� tG' 6t '•►� A, .. ' All‘.. . "''r%�/,/�`� tl t �;,,h\ -t�1, , �.e.♦ 1tl" '44 • •� r 4 • • ,.� .� ate -v`, e,1R •.!-�I �� /!�' ��� .'A1*1..• ,{�' •'�.. �i./.ri" + i �1• i {. , . ( •� \ :�'+ ��'. ,, e , y �[ w ]r�I/ ? a t> ✓ /+� 'f 'jl it • 1 { {• {i, r_ , 7 1..-.7.....„ , . ". . . r! ,... ",t th..+• 1. i. a tg • ''� ,,. i. • i • 41 a f.4y z;t 7' + i ,^eta•` y c` F ` ��, ,,r ^ � .� a� �z !% ;;� • • N, hi ,^� j r l tr. r,r " ,.:ek.. ),),,- .;., C',..'''•..t,'.a...t.:v, tii�.. • ... x�//�t��t'p�♦r. E �'�: �•L "�, a fy', -� _ '����- ' �j�� 's Y• W{ J. r 7 '. F ei G ! w.. t ::, �V �1. r- '�f h :', %/, i• ,i gina if r• •t .' ' + � me - ��•r�e ffl � lie 49 » .'x ,, „, te� '(' ♦.xis ir4 ,r Z ` •.r jig y i e -;� s 3 �'• •!. i a }� f a i .ue t. T�., 1 _ te. y i tit. 'r ..... . :•74 7 i ! , -9 : I, . ,e . .‘. .1 . _7_: . tl ..A. ... ,k egooegot.„,et... . . $ Ait...44:9330• , _It ,. . V • .3.*:1 ,) . 1 . 17 fr ,_ t le, ' Ai:.. • • - A4.. ;T `• N.' r tax ��r ♦ -.. ' M ` `F' ` DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 • The one way streets extend to Ocean Court and from there it Southwest corner of Collins Avenue this would allow trucks becomes a pedestrian only street. to access/exit the area Avenue. ng lef t or right on Collins 1 EAST — WEST CONNECTIONS — OPTION 2 avoiding the narrow Ocean Court alleyway hut also probably •Valet/drop off tones occur at the Southwest corners M Collins impacting the traffic load on Collins Avenue 3.9.7 PROPOSED ONE-WAY STREETS-PEDESTRIAN ONLY EXTENDS TO OCEAN CT ane easieue r a Ocean to the main providing person being dropped off an eacter access to the main streets. • There is a potential to have a loading tone on the west side of the valet/drop off area designated for smaller trucks only and • On streets with direction going East. loading with time that could be able to do the turn around on Ocean Coml. restrictions occurs at the Western end of the street and the Beginning of Restricted Wider turning Valet/Drop off'Left side hike lane improves motorists and Valet/Drop off Wider sidewalks Reflect nan Of Zone radius for access to tone i bicyclists visibility by having the bike lane on tone allows for planting tone N alley r the driver's side and nnnunrtes door tone areas O Loading,one with lime conflicts restrictions I x ilL • ' iiiil ii— ir ilaa113212/32=r1 on. ; I t j . Mr ailWrilo ,Agniallanaillia 11112 5 t �.. 40 tO . wipar " .1 14t f ilk -ail Lod rig ay �. . 0 Is -- 110V11 ^ ill a. -ilt 6 4 • • 0 4 ♦ i 4 + � Ildlit. � f lit A e4; 1111(il • i y , +fr y _ s It II te fie Pr 411 4, i si. 44404601. .14 I"7 I I LSECTNl +Z —— —— i �1 I 1REIM .., I 1 " AIL li I ADC()VISION PI AN.('lly 01 MIAMI Ill ACI-1 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS - OPTION 3 •The one way streets extend to Collins Avenue and from there • On streets with direction going Cast, loading with time becomes pedestrian only street.This option expands the idea of restrictions occurs al the West end of the street. This would 3.9.8 PROPOSED ONE-WAY STREETS-PEDESTRIAN ONLY EXTENDS TO COLLINS AVE Ocean Drive as a pedestrian street further into the city allow trucks to access/exit the area turning left or right on Collins Avenue,avoiding the narrow Ocean Court alleyway.hut • On streets with direction going East. valet/drop off zones also probably impacting the traffic load on Collins Avenue. occur at the Southwest corner of Collins Avenue. Beginning of Restricted Wider turning Valet/Drop off Left side bike lane improves motorists and Wider sidewalks Pedestrian only Zone radius for access to zone bicyclists visibility by having the bike lane on allows for planting zone N alley the driver's side and minimizes door zone areas O Loading zone with time conflicts wr il restrictions R ' ..".lamilili 1 PP' { ' i r 1 i I , ` •, 3 ' ba . j � ll iit a 1 1 " � � alp 1s as Ile • 111111 I : ! C'' t► i a �t ! no a 11�c �j ,..1.04 * If . . ' iV b lit i Ft' a JJ OM 61111.1111114"111 !, w i 16 fir** Iiiii74116 4 SECTION 1 . V ,t • LI i 1 1•01,1.111•• 4401111" • ili 1 . ammo :I i .41. 1 i — DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 ENHANCING THE CHARACTER OF CORRIDORS.STREETSCAPES AND ALLEYS GOALS ENHANCE THE IMAGE OF THE CITY Quality of Public Space:Diversity of type of space is important to exciting city experiences.Revamping Ocean Court and Collins 5.Bury utility lines. Court into usable spaces will provide different types of areas and help reduce some of the few current negative aspects of the 6.Re-pave the alleyways. ADCD. 7. Require buildings to maintain trash receptacles on private Enhance the Image of the City:Alleys are great places for local property and properly obstructed from view. plants,stormwater drainage,and green infrastructure initiatives. A.Have a landscape requirement. Safer Environment for People:In Miami Beach.the alleys are often neglected.and sometimes have uneven pavement and 9. Regulate size of service vehicles and allowable times for dark places for potential crime.Alleys are invaluable for giving deliveries. N service access,but encouraging additional uses such as retail. cafes and arts venues will ensure that alleys are cared and SAFER ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE looked after. 10.Ensure alley is clean and well lit. CHANGES TO BE MADE 11.New paving around drainage channel is key to safety.and creates surfaces that the disabled,children,and the elderly can 1.Provide for an alley study and design guidelines for this District. feel comfortable on. 2. Further define zoning requirements that would encourage 12.More uses and people along the alley will mean safer active aesthetic improvements along the alleys. spaces for pedestrian and businesses. 3.Incentivize public arts initiatives. 4.Create events for people to loin. AlI iUI)VISION PI AN.Cif y OI MMIAM1I Ill ACH DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14 2022 .‘............40011; ,- ,.:;..,°,,„ jetti ,.. : *Ir. .,, ,._Or . 1-. ,t'' 1066 'r-.4._ . .4111 ., :, ,,k._. Li,F .ib . ,k . s •41 �f- � :• r ►tea • i kwVor eE r \` �. :NA Si -d _J�" l ? .•• .•Y r , . , •�,."fir'" �"�,,• ,,.. ,- ,. .w A V ,. ,. �--"� nr Y ..f } al • 1 • r. .A , . 'r 4 .,1, ems•. ;T-,\\ 11► .`\ , . a a� � a ' mowJel y. ri`� ''j'-r;r, ! 1.- Fi ■i �I ��, p., �; �, ( f( a:Tt� � .�,w>t h1. l�- ,r, L� >, l' ; rlihilfr, 4 � COLL N5CT r .Yr ca i i • t 1\ i;h, " . ` s • *.ri 1` 10TH ST ^=` J Ir �• 4 7 . • �' � Allt ' hasp mum • . ` �s .. . J- COLLINS AVE � �1.1 .�, �"•• L �#. �u� { C✓�� OCEAN DR [ ! �ayC' .� •I _r • "�MJ� # ` 4 ��. �,�i �` fy , �. WMMUS PARK fir. C,(� `• ` ,-_ ,_ tl. � ,. r .. ��� nig/;' ,, ,''• _ . •1‘44° 4. ••• -" -• e a\ : 11s.ii.iiii.... ;.-.r. 1 -. OCl/1N CT . _• ' ` .moo V", .! �\ • lik ' 17•-7, %moo.v "j Y e 1 , •1 -^ • � • - 1 t •,. ivillo- • MMIMI,BLACH$Y JV'., I F', DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 I ALLEYWAYS 4.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS lit! . ;it • ,".. 1 ... i.111 .. . 7 iii r/z 1 , ,s,..., 0 ,i, i . ! : V ' ig .-e II i k I ' t• '* _7 olit I 111,,11.ii 1 I s 1 f, i li „ i t' -. : .*.‘,-, 1 d fee - •r I i I A _. ,T ..ON,� *1 1i e - # .,. ,4 , :,,i„.,,,.. .0-... . ,,,,, , -AN . 4 A% tor' Parked cars. Existing garbage areas make the alley unattractive. Congestion:truck,dumpsters,hikes,motorcycles and cars parking. Pavement. Concrete bollards protecting the meters. Stormwater drainage issues. 1 AI u'UVl'.I1M PI AN (.11Y 1)1 MIAMI III A(11 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 II . • r . '. R�. ,, �r .f • l , I , 1,..,..... . ._.,..,,i, .__ , * f T lc d 1 p . I i . 1' -A:' '' I -i' .4 4itifr 00. ! waiiiiiiii :— "- . ,�, I b\• ate" • 't a ac° $, ',sue • Utility luxes do not provide a nice aesthetic. Vatet current condition. Congestion on fast West streets tor vak•t drop oft. fil"II I I r I.Nt i I"nl "'MI"'AI'II.' ''''n1 p l l I 141 DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I ALLEYWAYS 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS GOOD PRACTICE I i 1 " ii. ,..._ , ,,,,, t , fd ,, J -�.. k it 4 ,. ...i ..., . . _ • le 1 I . s :� ,1 i d l �' r j �„� _ i Existing protects in Miami Beach MINtilimo i �F 1. Now development has cethat k from the alley making the N A * . alleyway wider. Q) ` 2. Bringing access to the loi by entranc e t " D - 3. Added lands(aping which enhances the r haractei of tile` ins tt alley - • .. �ti _ , . . , :.. f • 4_ . . Re pavement. • ' 411, mil " 1140 i 4,,, .. . . ..,. „. ,.. _ , ,„,.... ,. . I Moxy Miami South Beach i I Al WO VISION PI AN.(ITV(If MIAMI III AC Ft DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ' .:17**744. .. .;. . • ' •.1 %I. . • Fxrshng pmlects ui Mlanu beach hli .. - 1. Promotes achvahon of the share with user hnntmg the CJI I alley. - 2 Arts Initiatives that Wing people to alleyway-6 k IN 3. Adds lighting that not only enhances the haracter tit thr it ,•_.,, _ alley but also promotes a safer envrr rn r It - 4 Inch ides landscape that improves the quakily pithy spar t lit. ;1l� - , ,,," /4 . ,„.•t The Betsy South Beach i.1.k win!i I l rltt l Il;IV .11A0,11 Itl A(1111r .1',1,,,if H 1 14` DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ALLEYWAYS 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS-GOOD PRACTICE(CONTINUATION) • IF 1 • ... . . 4 7w.,„ •e.„,f. 1 1 9 a .... f i 111 II f""7""" .....amio• � 1�r , 07 r , :=. �- ,II - Iti L r, r or .' II. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 n1 lil n I ALLEYWAYS , , 4.3 APPROACH 1 11111°11111.111111111111.111111111111.1". :Ili - - - - — — " NI r .0 li Ito i _ Option A tn to ' 1 L N i. io 4 x ico ...r ter . ` , Option B DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 ZONING INCENTIVES The Zoning Incentives Recommendations for Collins Avenue and Part of the study area overlaps with the CRA boundary line.The Ocean Dove in the MXE District as summarized in this document intent of the diagram,as seen in figure 24.is to show that there is will serve to assist the City in implementing the goals and potentially another funding source for that overlap area.The CRA objectives of the ADCD Vision Plan.The intent of the proposed was originally created to provide money to help fund the Loews changes to the existing MXE zoning designation is to balance the Hotel and other prnlects at the time. These properties.which needs and maintain the character of Ocean Dove and Collins are located between 15th Street and 16th Street.anrt Collins Avenue but allow targeted and strategic zoning incentives that Avenue and Lummus Park,do not share the same characteristics would encourage people to quickly reinvest in the properties with the rest of the Art Deco Cultural District and as a result,if while protecting the historic character of the District. a zoning change for the ADCD District will be implemented this area should he evaluated. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS The Lincoln Road and Espanola Way blocks between Washington Zoning can be used as a tool to regulate and change outcomes Avenue and Collins Avenue have not been redeveloped as part and the elements used to create the preferred regulatory of a plan and need improvements.These two blocks could be Outcome are: funded by the CRA because they are within the CRA boundary. FAR HEIGHT SETBACKS USES PARKING LOCATION AND SCALE FROM STREET .11)(t)VlsION PLAN.(lt r Of MIAMI Ill A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I ZONING STUDY AREA 5.1.1 CRA OVERLAY ON THE MXE DISTRICT vr i ill .1 yr r ' / A y : 1 t j s STUDY ARE BOUNDARY , 1 I 1 -�, I / II 1 i t u I ' I • '•.I � �'' I� Overlap • ii , I I I I I I ' 1 1 I-: `RIM all 1 1 1 1 I ii ' 1 •�� 1 t 4 1 1 1 1 I 1 • t I 1 1 { ♦ : / r4 1 iF CRA and MXE Overlap Zone i —1l . 1 . I t Lam__ ' —— i I ,«.r N 5r1 nnn nnn 3.000 ,in rNrl l r r nl,,M.,11 q4,v 11 11 '11 11 l', I ,'n I 147 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 I ZONING STUDY AREA 5.1.2 HOW DO WE COMPLETE THE DISTRICT? * - Y : D Lincol►1 L.ms [East of Washington Ave.] M-3 ' CO-11 • RM2 RS-4 I 1 • C6/CPA RIKt W 1l •.,. Ll�tt! �♦ 1 1 P� GU ••GU / % / II I 1 I ICO,1 J ` I , " / / I i l \ : I I • / 1 IftRIFS Cat 1 % / : 1 '" / ifN }:....•f ,\ i_. Espanola Way ,4 f I w I w `''s _ - ; ® astwasngtolAv e.j I--r... . .... __r Ito 1 , :0-1 O RMJ i ! �J + ! ' MXE FAR Parking* Uses ! ou Hotels- Apartments: tMl f Mixed Use Entertainment District apartment t !1)/unI: hotels.hotels. I fil20 hostels.sane - hotels.and _ OOsf TM ! , R ] Single family �� R M'3 Hotels- detached R I S 64.2 / Residential Multifamily High Intensity 11)/unit dWei''"g x �. f fff11" ! __._� 2.0 200 ft(a '-`' (1v400 51 apartments. __ _—I Notes: Retail- apartment CPS-2 `'__ la)New construction-120 ft: (1V300 of hotels:hotels. hostels.and ""- suite hotels *PH *See Chapter 130-Off Street Parking for specifics _ DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING STUDY AREA 5.1.3 PROPOSED DISTRICTS ii 1 LI O ENTERTAINMENT I DISTRICT USES �' ;tOffice1. Incentivize renovation of existing buildings through additional height on ,/... ; blocks fronting Collins Avenue. Food&Beverage 2. Provide incentives for new hotel developments similar to those on ` Music and Dance Venues Washington Avenue and incorporate similar incentives for Collins Avenue ` Hotels and Ocean Drive. I. -,7. Al ,, 1 Residential 3. Further define zoning requirements to provide for contiguous North- 'ID I Arts South building aggregation at the back of the properties for office use along Collins Avenue. Performing Arts 4. Establish incentives for Performing Arts Spaces that promote the objectives of the Park of the Arts concept. (....) eel. IPAI or,,.,,, i I / j : I /, I O PARK OF THE ARTS 1 DISTRICT V rJr' USES 1. Incentivize renovation of existingbuildings through limited FAR i / / g g increase on blocks fronting Ocean Drive. e,. II Office 2. Amend zoning to create policy that no new music venues are allowed / / I Food&Beverage on Ocean Drive except between 9th Street-11th Street. 3. Develop policy for objective standard of permitted sound decibels �'�.''', I Hotels indoors and outdoors. �' Residential 4. Encourage larger hotel rooms and guest rooftop amenities at second Arts level and above. r 4` ,© Performing Arts 5. Establish incentives for Performing Arts Spaces that promote the 1 / P� objectives of the Park of the Arts concept. -wwl A te I -I 1 N Existing zoning code MXE FAR Height Parking* Uses Apartments: Mixed Use Entertainment District Hotels= apartment (1)/unit: hotels, hotels, 2.0 50 ft (a) ; Office= hostels,suite iai 1 >O It for Oceanfront hroi)ertirs i (1)/400 sf Retail = hotels,and (1)/300 sf commercial • i development • 4.1 I Hotels= 0: Commercial uses, C D-2 Office =0 apartments; if located apartment 46 Commercial Medium Intensity District within 500 ft hotels, hotels, Notes: 1.5(a) (55 ft b Retail = 0 hostels,and suite (a) When more than 25% of total building area is used for r for exst.and hotels, religious residential or hotel units,FAR shall be 2.0 as in RM-2 District. (1)/300 sf institutions. (b) Lots that have a frontage equal to or greater than 200 for new alcoholic ft: 75 ft; Main use parking garages: 55 ft, regardless of lot Quality rest. beverages 1 ,,.fmntage._ _. 4 = 0 establishments - . Single-family . Hotels= detached Residential Multifamily High Intensity -- (1)/unit: dwelling; '. Office = townhomes; 2.0 200 ft (a) (1)/400 sf apartments; Notes: * Retail = apartment (a) New construction-120 ft: (1)/300 sf hotels; hotels, hostels,and * See Chapter 130-Off-Street Parking for specifics suite hotels DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I EXISTING ZONING 5.2.1 ZONING MAP ( ' 1 IY g I •5<01 X a 1 IECFOw 1 g 9 i 3 i A N i �iR. i t ) A _., FUCln, it r 1 (ONVFNTfON(ENTER ow 1 X / I r") * ill alb 4111!IMO ilrir 73(4.7 0 i r AIM*IN ale 1 0 1 I . 1 Cr)_I 7ci p i) X J C:f f 1 ; c C y. .........,.....,........ I ! Li 1 IIII a ,_ • M8 QRCN/TECTV" I`jf n1a,�9l 10"�+a. ^tir RA(DISTRICT • DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I EXISTING ZONING 5.2.2 BASE FAR ( _ o IfFFII TO S4: ; • . • . �" • • . fRNN • AN • z ♦ • Z Z rANVE i-WHIN if NIT ♦♦ IIVIIIIIK r 1 • Q, • t. • • I 1411441111= iiiiii ill I . I a IZ i 1E1 1 \ i� I---�v a) . 5^, �NASHtNGfON ........L. ii....41. a 111.00 ill 111 imx) �� io /� -vow AO ' / '_ __ _ Mi r�fACNI Mg ARCHITECTU_ Rq�DISTQ Base FAR MT MIN •Refer to Miami Beach Code of Ordinances.Sec.142.Article II.-District Regulations -1I,(I)bl51uN ICI AN (I1 iN 41IAMI III Al H DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I EXISTING ZONING �_ 5.2.3 EXISTING HEIGHT i il Fff( ON 1 • • = 7 • 7 • ♦♦ • I _ ♦ n ♦ r--I i j j f CONVENTION CFNTFH ♦♦ I rite" ♦ T ♦ -I L im►auw omN l , ♦♦ cm aim INI.Ira..'Illii(i) / f ANASti1NGTON Irli , , ,.. , .4 m m• IRAN t.,, 11W L f CL ' r10 iz 1°D I -< / . 1 / Height • _ lie ARCHItEC RAC_ M/44(•,I IST® _ RICT P um , !. Refer to Miami Beach Code of Ordinances.Sec.142.Article II.-District Regulations DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Ocean_Dr tollmorn-nrri.= Zoning and Incentives There are certain properties on Ocean Drive.like The Gabriel.Hotel Victor.or the Cardozo Hotel.that have the advantage of being larger and/or corner properties. and that most of their rooms have the benefit of a view,whereas buildings like the Cavalier Hotel,the Leslie Hotel,and other single story buildings.their only real views are the front facing units and the other ones are in the back or side of the building. 02 The model has changed from more of a true hotel type of building to a food and beverage on the first floor of the building.and these mid block buildings are going to have challenges in terms of attracting the type of travelers that pay lop dollar not only for the sire of the rooms but also the views.So.how do you begin to incentivire those inner block buildings.that don't necessarily have the built in advantages that corner buildings have.in a way that does not compromise Ocean Dive's postcard image? Many of the buildings on Ocean Drive are less than 50 feet tall and most of them have used almost all of the FAR available to then(.Ocean Drive is almost entirely made up of these historic buildings.and figure 25 shows them except for the corners.This analysis addresses these inner block buildings. AUi Ii I ISIUN PI AN (ITN ill MIAMI ill Al 11 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE ZONING INCENTIVES 5.3.1 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK CONCEPT MID-BLOCK BUILDINGS BELOW 50' r WA.s NGTpNAVE n •••........q 2 a 4.h I......i• I cave r�,. z 2 + SL AVE /! Q VI © ti .q .rrrrr•rrrrn. i i If ����, ~ =rr• Ea i.....i i II inn r LUMMUS PARK I 1 2 LEVELS - BUILDING HEIGHT< 50' _ SAME OWNERSHIP BUILDINGS =ON OCEAN DR NM 3 LEVELS _SAME OWNERSHIP BUILDINGS 4 LEVELS = ON OCEAN DR&COLLINS AVE Figure 25 i: DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE ZONING INCENTIVES 5.3.1 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK CONCEPT(CONTINUATION) This analysis is not intending to recommend additional FAR but The main concept is to reconstruct the hack of the building. instead.how can FAR,height limitation.and ownership be used in rearrange the use of the floor area.and renovate the remainder a way that FAR can be added beyond what the buildings currently of the building while preserving the lobby and any other important have. It is proposed that if a building has more FAR than what architectural elements.so that from the street the same building the inning code allows,that it should be possible to reconstruct is appreciated but with different characteristics that would change some of the building,as long as the renovation does not make the the nature of the entire building. 0 budding more non conforming.For example.if a building currently has a FAR of 2.4.that building could be renovated as long as the If the hack portion of the budding envelope is reconstructed with renovation does not increase FAR beyond 2.4,even though the the basement dimension limited to the 70 ft hoot setback line,the code only allows for a FAR of 2.0 at this time. rear of the building is set back five 151 feet.and a slab is eliminated. FAR can be shifted in order to add an additional floor. This proposal looked at several protects on Ocean Drive to understand the implications of reconstructing the back of the buildings,but it At the moment.the average sue room is 200 SF:they are very small is important to note.that the plans used as examples throughout rooms with sub standard bathrooms.If the protect were to reduce this section are intended to illustrate properties that have not been the number of rooms but increase their sues it would improve the renovated and how they would benefit from new regulations.One of space,allow for higher quality finishes.and better space to create the main issues found is that the floor heights are very low,which is a new bathroom. one of the reasons why it is very hard to get high quality restaurants to rent space, because the space these high quality kitchens require.such as back of house.utilities.etc.do not currently fit in the buildings in their current form. it ii-li VISION I I AN,(lt i iu MIAMI fit ACII DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I OCEAN DRIVE ZONING INCENTIVES 5.3.2 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION/RENOVATIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK • 5' REAR SETBACK • RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING ALLOWED ONLY AT THE REAR AND IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS RENOVATED • FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS CAN BUILD UP TO THE SAME NON CONFORMITY 3 • MAX HEIGHT 50' OR 1 LEVEL, WHICHEVER IS LESS FOR MID-BLOCK BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION • 70' - 80' FRONT SETBACK ON ROOF TOP ADDITIONS • BUILDING LENGTH SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 150 FEET FOR PARCELS THAT ARE WIDER THAN 150 FEET. • ENCOURAGE GUEST ROOFTOP USES • ALLOWED ROOF TOP USES: HOSPITALITY SUITE / AMENITIES • POTENTIAL BONUS FAR (REFERENDUM?): HOSPITALITY SUITE/ AMENITIES AND ADDITIONAL HOTEL KEYS 130' DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 ' - I EXISTING HOTEL ANALYSIS 5.3.3 EXAMPLES > MECH KITCHEN Co IjAL STG STG RIOMS CC _I �T 1"""""" "'"' : "" "�"'� o ANALYSIS 1 - BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN H In wt#.1 Z 0 } U LOT AREA: 130'X 55'= 7,150 SF Z o Co O Z RESTROOMS � GYM LOUNGE TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17.286 SF oOFFICEg TOTAL FAR:2.41 _ — 35 KEYS(Avg.200 SF/Key) q ., TOTAL AREA: 2,029 SF N F 130' in'Q 1 I M." 1 } KITCHEN !� STG STG W i `_,CO LOT AREA:130'X 55'= 7.150 SF w +k— 'T I Z TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,1.60 SF O J 1 in CL 0 „r + Q TOTAI.FAR: 2.40 U } c� 24 KEYS(Avg.258 SF/Key) 0 Q o GYM LOUNGE o OFFICEet ° . /� 1 I , 7 :DEMOLISHED am �� �� ���:TOTAL IMPROVED AREAS J D�NIOLTSHED:3.650 SF 121.1 :,of buddingl TOTAL AREA: 2,029 SF Scale L 16-- 1 130' DRAFT REPORT #4 - 02.14 2022 ' ) I} ' MECH ST MAINT. EMPLOYEE o ANALYSIS 2 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN a �. ROOM . Z U Off — 86 LOT AREA: 130'X 50'=6.500 SF Z TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17.489 SF w o LAUNDRY KITCHEN OFFICE TOTAL FAR:2.69 46 KEYS(Avg.153 SF/Key) TOTAL AREA: 2,498 SF W I 130' I 1 Q - - cN LOT AREA: 130'X 50'=6.500 SF MECH OFFICE -1 EMPLOYEE t- - - ROOM - TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17.420 SF cti Cc H b L _ Z TOTAL FAR:2.68 4 w Z ' ��, — 0 25 KEYS(Avg.350 SF/Key) w I5 L ,U o KITCHEN r STG C :DEMOLISHED N TOTAL IMPROVED AREAS DEMOLISHED:5.132 SF 129"<.of building) TOTAL AREA: 2,297 SF N \ DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I ZONING TESTING — FAR AND HEIGHT i/ BUILDING . c 70.EXISTING 5.3.4 OCEAN DRIVE MID BLOCK POTENTIAL RECONSTUCRON Al IO F F FI tr RECONSTRUCTION BUILDING RENOVATION g 70 FT SETBACK d Sbmlan s s s s p 35 KEYS(Avg.200 SF/Key) i Z w i w TOTAL FAR:2.40 —J O Q s tin,ung1Xvrr ,.,nl '4'' LOT AREA:130'X 55'=7.150 S TOTAL GROSS BUILDING ARFA: 17,286 SF i I i i ,iIT- ♦ 1 130' i {1aC.nr,n r, a 41 EXISTING MAX SO HEIGHT 1,4,crI tili,n7, 70•FRONT SETBACK FOR 22 KEYS(Avg.370 SF/Key) ROOF TOP ADDITIONS W — > IIIIMIN: s TOTAL FAR: 2.40 Cn O _ LOT AREA: 13O'X 55'= 7.150 SF 'ZIX TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA. 17.139 SF w Cr :RECONSTRUCT ... :PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT L 130' '"" ' ` ; ROOF TOP ADDITION ma •,;.In,r-rr,I'I II •,t,uni;i ., DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 Potential building reconstruction represents up to 57/,including Maximum building basement envelope that can never be filled 50'HEIGHT pFc, 01 s 57% rqG�. o, '-OF BUILDING r '-AREA CriOG�PNCS i,c,pt s� • (ems -, 0EJ`NcS do 6qs , .M til O�EpN OR 0uMMUs PPR� OOP' & 0014'OS PPR� EXISTING, POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.4.1 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* 70 FT SETBACK Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net Basement 1,047 SF 890 SF Renovate Ground Level 2,159 SF 1,835 SF Existing Level 2 2,418 SF 2,055 SF Level 3 2,418 SF 2,055 SF Basement 646 SF 549 SF Reconstruct Ground Level 1,292 SF 1,098 SF +on ` Existing Level 2 2,475 SF 2,104 SF = 2.40 Level 3 2,475 SF 2,104 SF Addition Level 4 2,209 SF 1,878 SF 'o so TOTAL FLOOR AREA 17,139 SF 14,568 SF S 'S',, Nct �/ '`6?(� 'yl TOTAL FAR PROPOSED 2.40 oc-� TOTAL FAR EXISTING ) 440 TOTAL KEYS I 22 Units W, W z, L3 UILDING ►.. 70•EXISEINL w? RI CONSTRUCTION BUILDING RENOVAI ION •w , a , a o, 0 a, a i ROOF TOP ADDITION 1.. °o�Noa voMMvsvP I '1,(O,0'-I."''I'I1'4 IIII,u \Ii N',U III A'II ? F. FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED fAR IN f XI',IING NON CONFORMING RUII DIN(,, DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 A - t•, - - _4 -"id. AV 1 R ; r 1 PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10' vy 1010 fillikr ` ii ____________ _____ ... .. . . Ify - f tir ti' .star U � � i.,#.,.. s� 7 f r•,� Ili" __ i�'yd t'itt '44 cll.' tt k! %L % fry a j PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40' ` {'.F. 'I.AR IN FXISTING NON CONFORMING BUILDINGS DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.4.2 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* +0.30 BONUS FAR 70 FT SETBACK Lot Ares 7,150 SF Gross Net Basement 1,047 SF 890 SF Renovate Ground Level 2,159 SF 1,835 SF Existing Level 2 2,418 SF 2,055 SF Level 3 2,418 SF 2,055 SF Basement 646 SF 549 SF Reconstruct Ground Level 1,292 SF 1,098 SF +2 °O1 Existing Level 2 2,475 SF 2,104 SF Level 3 2,475 SF 2,104 SF Addition Level 4 2,209 SF 1,878 SF y �o. Level 5 2,209 SF 1,878 SF 00 sfiei. -Ayr TOTAL FLOOR AREA 19,348 SF 16,446 SF �` IA� ._ . Oft�< TOTAL FAR 2.70 ti , 7 y, _ ; TOTAL FAR EXISTING J.4(1 TOTAL KEYS I 26 Units ; z, B��ILOIN 70'E XISIING -04I Z 11 RFr,'ONSTRUTION R. BUILDINd RENOVATION 'W .a 1 i I ROOF TOP ADDITION I... { I EPN 0� LUNNOS PO'OC' 3 l.. i I Aim'U VISION PI AN.(fIl Y of MIAMI III ACH : FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED III BONUS FAR •FAR IN 1 XISIING NON CONFORMING BUILDINGS DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 ~� „ Tt y r w ea 4 • t M 1 ``` fit. ,d - " .P 1r p ,A y I \.4 f• PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10• ` 5..) Olok,,,,:te 44 t► 1 :�� t it" / It' -. --_— .,;ems r. . . 1.111 ii irr -- 70110.. PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40' :;ti",�w„.. ,g ' t 1 ; ,-..' ►I O • , i •f AR IN L.XISTING NON CONFORMING BUILDINGS .i,i,•.AP11,I lq,,II,ill 'II,'II III V II R, i,:ul ter, DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14 2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.4.3 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK VIEW- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* 70 FT SETBACK .• t I .�• _ y � i C - 1 ;A ' '4 ti ir. f,! 4f �, �►N, 4 .. , 1i1 Rll liti .. ' •• ,•. `` .- nt elr il fo. .. '''''' .. : Wit: 8:.41f . . i'Olti-, ,k1.01;iiiiii , Lit le . N- il `` wr. ifI • i! "' j „ 4 ter+ .. "..^1111111111.. 1 ..'" "Al- . 4. .IS I, ' '• ' 'it, 1�'. . al, IZ '•"� t tf r % "`,,L•iid...,... r , • OWN -�— _ � � � � .....,..____, ....... „' 1. , , 40ios, -Ali � 41.'".11111S'sl t / .. a ----„ `'." dro- CION PLAN.C:I I'I)1 MIA ...... . i fir. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.4.4 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK VIEW - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* +0.30 BONUS FAR 70 FT SETBACK troi NitkAk' '''' '''' .,..,. x; .. , .. „. . . .,... ..... . • 4,i i . . .:. - ..„ 2... ,:* . .,..•. „ _ . _ ,, ,.. _. .... ..... ...... .,. . , ... ..., .. . .... , . t I 611" 4 ' .... II't 1 ,,,-,, ..,1111:a"elfr'' • ' ,I f4,1, N ••,1::,°,464,1,,IC.:00,':',."..,,..:!.::,- t _,it: .. told • R ■ I r �i _ 4 t i ........i ---=...... ' ,,,,„;;;:.14 • , 4,,,, . . is ,� •yeti ' . 'y l E . -----"r'' ''' 1144; ill a r O I:tN EXISTING NON CONFORMIN a 1� DRAFT REPORT #4 -02.14.2022 2 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT i� BUILDING �� 80'EXISTING 5.3.5 OCEAN DRIVE MID—BLOCK — POTENTIAL RECONSTUCTION AT 80 FEET E RECONSTRUCTION BUILDING RENOVATION 80 FT SETBACK — - -- ----- -----•- --• '- lop of SI, Ion i7.Si 3 3 Q m 35 KEYS(Avg.200 SF/Key) 3 z -I Q TOTAL FAR:2.40 3 w U Q 3 S^rood I k o.1„\.,O IA,: LOT AREA: 130•X 55'-- 7.150 S 7. TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17.286 SF v. _ , M^i fgnlnr low! ! y IN' 4.146. I nhh,I a`^I Waft,. ..iX' / 4 ' me 'n 130' I 1{a— i,w,•1 CO IVE EXISTING MAX SO HEIGHT Ian a,nAnnnm Q 80' FRONT SETBACK FOR ROOF TOP ADDITIONS t 22 KEYS(Av 370 SF/Ke cr W ..,ti,,, g. y) CO) TOTAL FAR: 2.40 or less ) 1 2 O 3 ° ""'^"'^"^^'O LOT AREA: 130.3x7 X 55' 7.150 SF o- Z TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 16.737 SF a W I 6 J 2 O Q —1 14 f, ,o Cr _• :RECONSTRUCT a. T r, • ""'" I'1^' :PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT [4' nIr litatle 130' "a`^nw,nl''ry^I ROOF TOP ADDITION 7GH I 1I If O VI'RIN PI AN (111 III MIAMI III A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 Potential building reconstruction represents up to 43 X including Maximum building basement , envelope that can . never be filled 50' HEIGHT �Fc, s 43% r,��cl s,�o. OF BUILDING - ,..• ..--r-' ' -- i AREA W Nct � N�� i f�s�hc OGEP l -. Oa). 6q�Fl1 N. ti r e' r - P OCF PN OR 0uMMUPO' OGEPN OR L.. M) PPRµ I XISTING POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.5.1 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* 80 FT SETBACK Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net Basement 1,299 SF 1,104 SF Renovate Ground Level 2,663 SF 2,264 SF Existing Level 2 3,084 SF 2,621 SF Level 3 3,084 SF 2,621 SF Basement 394 SF 335 SF Reconstruct Ground Level 788 SF 670 SF bk. + 2 4111111111111 Existing Level 2 1,809 SF 1,538 SF Level 3 1,809 SF 1,538 SF Addition Level 4 1,809 SF 1,538 SF 0 0 A,s ti TOTAL FLOOR AREA 16,739 SF 14,228 SF Fi (1G�NNc� .',,.. �egc4,Qyr TOTAL FAR PROPOSED 2.40 or less TOTAL FAR FXISTIN(, ) 4O S• TOTAL KEYS 22 Units UUII DIN(, SU' XISTING "' RI CONSTRUCTION BUI(DIN(RENOVATION 1;, a w :t . ROOF TOP ADDITION w 05 LPN�R 00° PPR OC' IIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIAI 1 Ail(II ONION PI AN.CII,Of MIAMI III A(II - c FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED (AR IN IXISIIN(,NUN CON(OWNING BUILDINGS DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 . / �, r. P 1 1 h t .,. .. l . ...a fe • PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10' A • " ; • " • s 9�gyw,'t 011 " i M1' +' // f 1' 1 ' ' - '''''' ' ' ' :%:‘'''' 6 - i. 4 -----:, -"v ..--,'1,1,,,:,.„.':'41.*:;i; `,;.... „:, "'sw 1.________ • } , x s ;„,„,,,:ii.„,,,,.::,.,.,,...,,,,..,,,..,,,,,-.,,,,,,,,„., ., : ..,..:,,:, , _, , ,_,, . .., , , 5 !AI' ,. {PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40' ` , ` �` '• '' • • .f AR IN[XISTING NON CONFORMING BUILDINGS ,,,,l,,Aul 111111)f I I:'fl \IIAMI RI.v I I I?, „ ouI: I 171 DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.5.2 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* +0.30 BONUS FAR 80 FT SETBACK Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net Basement 1,299 SF 1,104 SF Renovate Ground Level 2,663 SF 2,264 SF Existing Level 2 3,084 SF 2,621 SF Level 3 3,084 SF 2,621 SF Basement 394 SF 335 SF Reconstruct Ground Level 788 SF 670 SF +two(2)floors Existing Level 2 1,809 SF 1,538 SF 2.60 FAR Ai Level 3 1,809 SF 1,538 SF Level 4 1,809 SF 1,538 SF eo so Addition Level 5 1,809 SF 1,538 SF 01 PNC� L-_ sue' c9l TOTAL FLOOR AREA 18,548 SF 15,766 SF oC TOTAL FAR 2.60 MI TOTAL FAR F XISTINC, 2.41) TOTAL KEYS I 25 Units W, ,W ?' BUI ppIN 80 LX1S11NG ,Z -` RLCON fttI T10N -;4 BUILDING RFNOVATION 1110. E. IR ,a ROOF TOP . -,- ADDITION I N OP VUMMV59 PR� - - �EP 1 11,I n wI'I,'J I'i N.(Ii,„I wAMi III A(I E : FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED 1111 BONUS FAR I AR IN I.tISIIN(,NON C()MOWING BUILDINGS DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 / � ,� � f ..yam 4 t � ,, � � ��- jr...;,a 4,,.• .,'': 4.4b ..... 03 PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10' -41 ii . I. I. • w + v rw PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40' ;;, !;,,,.` r , �" '�++� (/ kJ ' , 0 I Aft IN I XISIING NON x,NI ORMING BUILDINGS w DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.5.3 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK VIEW- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* 80 FT SETBACK • or ea', 4111 t ' 1 I ' lit 01 .. , x `g • . ilea r 1 ,4...,....: : ; 1 ICAflt fff�i _ yY �- }� 1 F► 1 1 �kk - i ,, it t MrifillU: *FAR IN EXISTINk DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.3.5.4 OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK VIEW RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* +0.30 BONUS FAR 'i0 FT SETBACK ` - ... .. Af w' t . i ',etc - • j 1 ''• a i! ' Li ; • ill , r • . , , �, •�•• . 110 , III 6 • „ _ t, 4 y . siv So.,*• : is g ill_ , , -.„. tit: a i . .,i , i . . . . ._. .. ..,, 8.1: : 1 i,. ,i`‘ , , . t .4 1 17 . -.0 1. — 10 . .' , . L '.. '1* OP e. ' 1 0 I. '_„; r•" , y ' .1 a j 1 1 ltk di JO 0 rill•IP . '4,41 All aj6- '' -.7111••••••- . • . • - ,_ 4.c.i,I:N.; -MEW -- , , ••••••=100M.MIIMIM.16-- re le .: - / ? 'FAR IN LXISTINt DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02.14 2022 I ONE AND TWO STORY ADDITIONS EXAMPLES 5.3.6 MODERN MEETS HISTORIC-ONE STORY ADDITIONS .4 _ • 1,,, ///ai■ . . �. N ,„,.. „ ,_;,_:.. ., ; _ , b ,, . . .,,____ ,„ i: , . 1 InIPM1111111111j1 *MU Jo vr 147LL11011.1.1711,111; . . ay 1.1_ .. , - _ Ir " 33 41.1.1. 1 ,1 e . ,.,,,,, el. - ,. . --.. . 1111' .., . . co cr) . - u it * , . . ,tl I I . b?Ill -r.71.-: ,4. A t "%I.,. ,1 ,-.'" , in a I, witil. . [iv rn, irril ,...._ ,_ v - I I , 1 , I 1 I 1 _. a .„ .\ ._4. , „....-„ c... ...... . . .., „...... , . .„, . ., NI — ,j. I , ,,. ir IL---->____...=____._ ■ a 0 - -�-. l , 1 I ! ;'` il �; ^ .... M. —1 1 1 V 4 ‘,...,,,,;, !"� ' p k I1+ � 4 .: _r , _ !I a ' rr-1 I - - ill 1 I A , - at lik iL, 1110t—e irt 4 t t • a .., III .1 •...,.,.,.,,F DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14 2022 5.3.7 MODERN MEETS HISTORIC- TWO STORY TERRACING ADDITIONS c■ n. ..4 litp,17 ,...,,,,ik I, i,.. 1 , L' /10, 0-.' 1....;ip,„ Ir..1.„, VP.":•, Ai CO L ,41 - 1„.,1 Vik . 0 0§. ;,.. 1•A .41,011r/ ..> / -c s .__ �s R� z.31 �r•.r l,.,. :. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 o Collins Ave Ell yI' _1►i ICfgIITtI Zoning and Incentives cD N there is potent ai to explore the height and potential i AR incentive,along the East side of Collins Avenue to encourage the connection between Collins Avenue and Ocean Drive.because it won't have the same impact as on Ocean Drive.This plan embraces what the City's Planning and Zoning Department has been proposing. which is the opportunity to increase height at the back of the buildings. The diagram in figure 26 shows a typical block on Collins Avenue and the area in yellow represents the area of renovation and/or reconstruction.Since Collins Avenue is a narrow street with buildings on both sides and there is an opportunity to create a substantial front setback and to build above. Al WI)'l',IUN PI AN (IIn ill MIAMI HI ACtl DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I COLLINS AVENUE ZONING INCENTIVES 5.4.1 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK ZONING CONSIDERATIONS : • 5'REAR SETBACK • MAX HEIGHT 75'OR 2 LEVELS.WHICHEVER IS LESS FOR MID BLOCK BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION • 70'FRONT SETBACK ON ROOF TOP ADDITIONS Elevator shafts allowed above max.height .75 ri Collins:Max.75'height or 2 levels,whichever 70'Front setback is less for mid-block building reconstruction CO .65' Above existing building's height Existing max.50'height 11 5 I .50' 11 Maximum 15`wide for connection between buildings above the alley _- - - -_-- -I II .15' Existing [Building reconstruction] ,, L.�, ` !!,,����, (renovation] y 5'Setback I l M l 1 1. Alley P P v v 1 Figure 26 .. ... • DRAFT REPORT##4 -02 14 2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.4.2 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT BEYOND 70' 70 FT SETBACK Maximum building envelope that can never be filled 75'HEIGHT oc�p0ct oc�PNct y *. .< , ,Pe.,,, lo 0 p. Oysj, q Gp} CD N _, • co`°45 P co``'NS p‘Nit". • EXISTING POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION I AIH 1)1,14I(1N PI AA, (111,of MIAMI 111 A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 CO-P"Gj NNN t0 C�1 ROOF TERRACE: 14.510SF OF LOT AREA: 69"•- 1TO, ;, 1yp ROOF TERRACES DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.4.3 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.5 FAR -- 2 f,"yl 000S GS -- tat Area 21,000 SF Gross Not Renovate Ground Level 8,400 SF 7,140 SF Level 2 8,400 SF 7,140 SF Existing Level 3 5,600 SF 4,760 SF • CO - ~ °s Reconstruct Ground Level 9,100 SF 7,735 SF CI) F?e Level 2 9,100 SF 7,735 SF 4c�r Existing = Level 3 5,850 SF 4,973 SF , Level 4 2,990 SF 2,542 SF Addition Level 5 2,990 SF 2,542 SF i ;' TOTAL FLOOR AREA 52,430 SF 44,566 SF `. , TOTAL FAR PROPOSED 2.50 2.12 Addt Retail 9,100 SF 7,735`NS PEE TOTAL GpL Addt Office 20,930 SF 17,791SSF DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 +i two(2)floors 2.50 FAR a`-, , S ' . it` ' l`. 410 - ' 1114;t0 IMPlir- - - V ..:.#. - • za1_ a.. 1- .♦ •mot A 1 1:misairisli semi 111111111 - .. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.4.4 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.75 FAR ..�- Lot Area 21,000 SF Gross Net r Renovate Ground Level 8,400 SF 7,140 SF Existing Level 2 8,400 SF 7,140 SF Level 3 5,600 SF 4,760 SF )o Ground Level 9,100 SF 7,735 SF OOoo she Reconstruct Level 2 9,100 SF 7,735 SF 4O4 Existing Level 3 6,500 SF 5,525 SF N \ Level 4 3,550 SF 3,018 SF - Addition Level 5 3,550 SF 3,018 SF Level 6 3,550 SF 3,018 SF TOTAL FLOOR AREA 57,750 SF 49,088 SF , TOTAL FAR PROPOSED 2.75 I 2.3375 1. GOV'\Nspv� TOTAL Addt Retail 9,100 SF 7,735 SF Addt Office 26,250 SF 22,313 SF -AI,(I,,V.Rf'5 PI A'. (II,i,1 AgvMI lil A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02 14.2022 . A r 1, , 'r "'three(3)floors *a. „. = 2.75 FAR ,* `xA. • k • CD sail, � e 3111114611111.1 -- - aluilir- `te- .t1". " r,. DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.4.5 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR+ BONUS 0.5 FAR t N t ► 4 O r O , ` .`/, — i �{{ a v amip.......r..., p •Iiici;....:1.0....# ,.: • / `, \�- r -I, . •ice .._ ,� t .N". Qi?it!" 1 416-... . , ..... ...1 AFX'.i)JMSIUN PI AN (,11 UI MIAMI Fit A(.H TIRO t DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14 2022 I ZONING TESTING - FAR AND HEIGHT 5.4.6 COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.75 FAR i IV } 0 o .. f girt lip iC■ °` " 4 : to 1 yF. 410111 ib. I 1 . 101., ::„...i....., 4 .IIIPiis•, . Ito 1 • . - Q, _ ‘ �` _ t ONE —1 �. ` '4rA DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 I ZONING TESTING SUMMARY 5.5 OCEAN DRIVE AND COLLINS AVENUE TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT OCEAN DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION AT 70' STEPBACK 2.40 BASE FAR* + 0.30 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 50" height, including basement (+1 BONUS LEVEL if approved by referendum) RECONSTRUCTION AT 80' STEPBACK 2.40 BASE FAR* + 0.20 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 50' height, including basement (+1 BONUS LEVEL if approved by referendum) COLLINS AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT 70' STEPBACK 2.0 BASE FAR + 0.50 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 63' height 2.0 BASE FAR + 0.75 BONUS FAR 6 LEVELS at 75' height `FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS DRAFT REPORT#4 - 02 14.2022 I ZONING TOOLS, DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES AND DEVELOPER INVESTMENTS 5.6 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS ZONING TOOLS 1. "SUNSET PROVISIONS" 2. PARTIAL OR COMPLETE WAIVING OF PARKING IMPACT FEES. 3. INCREASE FAR + HEIGHT FOR FIRST 2-3 CATALYST PROJECTS AS A PILOT. 4. EXAMINE USE OF CRA FUND TO ENHANCED ESPANOLA WAY PEDESTRIAN CHARACTER EAST OF WASHINGTON AVENUE TO COLL INS AVENUE. c DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES 1. INCENTIVES IN HEIGHT + FAR [PAY TOWARDS PUBLIC PURPOSE FUND AND/OR ARTS FUNDING SOURCES 2. INCENTIVES WOULD APPLY ONLY TO HOSPITALITY.OFFICE AND PERFORMING ARTS USES. 3. ELIMINATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFICE USES ALONG COLLINS AVENUE. 4. ALLOW OFFICE AS CONVERSIONS OF INTERIOR BUILDINGS WHILE MAINTAINING HISTORIC COMPONENTS ALONG COLLINS AVENUE 5. ALLOW OFFICE COMMON AREAS IN GROUND FLOOR OF BUILDINGS ALONG COLLINS AVENUE DEVELOPER INVESTMENTS 1. NORTH-SOUTH BUILDING AGGREGATION ALONG COLLINS AVENUE ALLOWS FOR CONTINUOUS BUILDING FOOTPRINT. 2. "BUYOUT" OF CONDOMINIUM BUILDING(SINGLE OWNER APPROACH). PROVIDES ACCESS TO INCENTIVES. $•$$$$,Nl$,I i II I I I, I` i u I is, AFT REPORT #4 -02 14 2022 PART IV. a MXE District-Vision and Character for the District EIEZOJINOIEIRIfi AlInFACTIONJTENIS�{A Near term:within 24 months/Mid-term within 60 months(2-5 years)/Long Term+5 years IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION ITEMS NEAR TERM MID-TERM LONG TERM 1.1.1 Engage Landscape and Environmental Engineers to evaluate the site and generate a design grounded by creating resiliency with nature as a principle. 1 1 2 Engage cultural stakeholders in Miami Beach to assist with Lummus Park of the Arts implementation. 1 1.3 Improve Lummus Park's program offerings by including diverse program opportunities.The South end remains more active.whereas the center portion becomes a civic center.The North end is quieter and relates more to nature.Proposed programming complemented with new amenities 1 1.4 Introduce art and nature as overarching themes.Landscape and hardscape design invite 1.1 Expand Lummus Park and activate and refine opportunities and spaces for art installations along the park From formal display spaces to impromptu park programming to promote Park of the Arts performances to the essence of the landscape design itself.the user will face an ever-changing concept. experence dependent on the park visitor's chosen route. 1 1.5 Extend 5th.8th.10th.121h,and 14th streets into the park as plazas.These areas will also serve as x beach access points. 1.1.6 Preserve the parks legacy and history by using rock wall as the main circulation route and structural backbone.The iconic Coconut Palms and lawn areas will be scaled to give way to native dune x planting and improved park access 1 1 7 Implement shade structures and viewing platforms West of the dune levee to provide space for shaded activities and 360-degree views to ocean and city EXPAND THE PHYSICAL LANDSCAPE BY CREATING A 1.1.8 Create a topographic path West of the dune levee to introduce program opportunities with ocean GREAT PARK,PUBLIC SPACES AND CULTURAL views x OFFERINGS 1.2 1 Study feasibility of converting East-West streets to one-way traffic X )The protect intends to bong nature into the City.integrating the 1.2.2 Study drop-off,valet and loading zones on East-West streets. X beach and dune into the park as a resilient landscape space Under 1 2 3 Evaluate potential net parking losses on East-West streets. x the premise of connectivity.the park will increase its transparency. 1 2.4 Evaluate current parting and loading operation and impact of moving them on the one-way East- x will allow users to see and be seen.as pail of the historic character West Streets. IV of Ocean Drive Access to the park will be facilitated and more 1.2.5 Review delivery and waste removal plan including locations.turn-arounds.etc x 0 program opportunities will activate areas otherwise unused 1.2.6 Evaluate an interim proposal of doing one-way pairing East-West streets,including painting, CY) 1 2 Improve connection of Lummus Park to the expanding the sidewalks,and adding planters 1 There is an opportunity to take advantage of Lummus Park.which is 1.2.7 Provide a left-side bike lane in the direction of the car that would improve motorists and bicyclists' an exceptional space but is currently underutilized.and use it as the D str by enhancing the East-West Street visibility and minimize door zone conflicts network basis for doubling its size to lacditate other programming 1.2 8 Widen sidewalks to allow for planting areas opportunities such as recreation.arts and culture as well as support 1 2.9 Implement East-West streetscape imDrovementa space for the City functions 1.2.10 Improve access from the West by consolidating street ends as urban plazas and widening Ocean Drive West sidewalks. The side streets could oiler additional planting space that would 1.2.11 Design and integrate alternative transportation systems,including potential transit station on 5th provide shade,visual interest,and additional infiltration areas for storrnwater landscape corridors could bring pollinators and other street,ndeshanng drop off areas along Ocean Drive.rental a-bikes and charging stations. species back to the City.and potentially tie all together and connect 1.2 12 Improve park's East to West connectivity by increasing the park's permeability on the Ocean Drive park and City as part of a larger ecosystem( side by opening mid-block access into the park 1.3 Improve dining and walking experience next to 1 3.1 Widen sidewalks along Ocean Drive to allow for outdoor promenading.seating.and planting areas Ocean Drive buildings that will also ensure pedestrian safety and proper flows. 1 4 1 Engage with highly qualified engineer and resiliency experts 1 4.2 Evaluate creative lighting design that wont affect sea turtle nesting season x 1 4 3 Provide more planting areas that promote stormwater infiltration and/or water capture 1.4.4 Limit the amount of beach access points to reduce habitat fragmentation. x 1 4.5 Create a new beach walk West of the dune levee to increase and restore the dune vegetation.and 1 4 Increase resiliency and enhance ecosystems. associated ecosystems and also provide additional area for bike/ped at the current dune elevation while providing both views to the ocean and views of the historic hotels 1 4.6 Improve and increase storm surge protection with the creation of a new beach walk West of the dune levee 1 4 7 Increase biodiversrty and provide educational opportunities to the public by increasing dune x vegetation 1.4.8 Incorporate native planting x 1 5 Improve Lummus Park North-South 1.5 1 Provide improvements of the existing Lummus Park circulation including signalization.program. connectivity and accessibility Expand walkways into open plazas at every street end 1 6 Maintain and enhance current program 1 6 1 Survey Current Sports Infrastructure and propose improvements as needed x 1 6 2 Provide space and access to beach as a venue for large events(Concerts.Art Basel.etc I x opportunities 1.6.3 Provide space for City of Miami Beach departments[Public Works,Parks and Recreation,etc). x MXE District-Vision and Character for the District RECOIMPIDATEet$ptgpfeatelitITEM 144.2022 Near term:within 24 months/Mid-term within 60 months(2-5 years)/Long Term+5 years IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION ITEMS NEAR TERM MID-TERM LONG TERM 2 1 1 Hire a consultant/team to determine a scope of action and phasing for the establishment of a ESTABLISH CONSERVANCY TO MANAGE LUMMUS PARK Partnership-likely a Conservancy-tasked with the management,improvement.and programming of the x AND POTENTIALLY THE OVERALL DISTRICT future extended Lummus Park and South Beach Cultural District. 2 1 Establish a conservancy. 2.1.2 Detail the phasing.competencies transfer.scope and area of action,board composition,and 'The Conservancy an independent 501c3 organization will manage financing for the proposed organization. the park on behalf of the City A diverse hoard bridging pnvate. 2 1 3 Detail what practical steps and legislation are required to put this organization in place.as well as 2 public,and civic sectors will ensure the Conservancy's mission best x outline the possible options available to the City serves the public's interest A specific management agreement with the City will establish its scope of action It will fundraise from a 2.2.1 Evaluate and define potential allowable uses within the park for arts pavilions.FAR.public number of sources and increase the resources available to the park gathering venues,and other small buildings related to the Park of the Arts and prepare appropiate land Its professional staff.dedicated to Lummus Park,will offer a world- 2.2 Create programming of activities and special use and zoning guideknes, class park ecpenence to visitors Over time.this organization could events. 2.2.2 Develop incentives for uses such as galleries/museums/pavikons/exhibitions/and highly select increase its responsibilities in the neighborhood x � I and limited commercial activities 2.2.3 Create a stud of s r• ial events. 3.1.1 Engage a consultant to develop a multimodal corridor study. 3 1 2 Define the problem and define the guiding principles for the study using the FOOT Muttimodal Corridor Planning Handbook for guidance.Elements included in this action item: -Stakeholder and Public Engagement -Data collection -Synthesis of information -Definition of guiding principles -Definition of purpose and need -Definition of measures of success 3 1.3 Define and select alternatives -Identify the horzon year by using the Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model(SERPM)and land- CREATE A BALANCED TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN use and growth assumptions to identify future-year traffic volumes on the study corridors.including Ocean Drive.Collins Avenue,and Washington Avenue. 'Prepare for the future mobility needs of the District by taking -Determine the horizon year capacity on study corridors with proposed concepts.Calculate the advantage of proposed high-capacity transit connections to the difference between future-year traffic volumes and the horizon-year capacity mainland increasing parking availability through parking and -Refer to guidance from the FOOT Design Manual for conceptual design solutions.the Miami-Dade 2045 curbside management strategies.and re-purposing roadway space 3 1 Conduct a mulkmodal corridor planning Long-Range Transportation Plan,and the SMART Plan for connections with ongoing efforts. 3 to provide sale and comfortable facilities to priority users.including study 3 1 4 Trip Redistribution.Address the difference between future year traffic volumes and the horizon year people walking and biking in the District capacity The proposed mulkmodal corridor planning study.led by the City. •Tnp generation changes(people not traveling to the ADCD) would satisfy FOOT and Miami-Dade County requirements while •Redistribution(trip route changes) X identifying the feasibility.protect development and engineenng •Mode switch(high-capacity transit.new or enhanced transit services,active transportation,vehicular IPDBE),and preferred alternative concept designs associated with restrictions) the transit and mobility plan recommendations •Alternative final destinations(parking facilities and curbside management) 3.1 5 Mitigation:Study mitigations and incorporate public feedback to address the following. •Capacity on parallel routes(Alton Road and Meridian Avenue) •Adjustments to proposed study candor concepts to mitigate impacts •Diverted traffic analysis and neighborhood traffic study in the Flamingo/Lummus neighborhood •Transit priority treatments coinciding with current and proposed transit services •Walking/biking facilities to attract more users •A comprehensive parking,loading,and curbside study to address vehicle storage needs 3 1 6 Identify a comprehensive list of recommendations,cost estimates.and an implementation plan to include the timing and phasing of recommendations 3 1 7 Determine evaluation metrics for reviewing and adplskng the recommendations over time x MXE District-Vision and Character for the District Ri:t0JIMEII0PillONFrAlllDrACTIODITEMS D1022 Near term:within 24 months/Mid-term within 60 months(2-5 years)/Long Term+5 years IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION ITEMS NEAR TERM MID-TERM LONG TERM 3 2 1 Develop a policy to ensure that the proposed high-capacity transit connections.Bus Rapid Transit and proposed Collins Avenue circulator seamlessly integrate with existing transit. 3.2.2 Work with a consultant specializing in branding and marketing to evaluate how the proposed Bus Rapid Transit,high-capacity transit connections and circulator can promote a new image for the Cultural 3.2 Improve connectivity of existing and future District. transit. 3.2.3 Increase parking availability through the identification of shared parking options,transportation demand management measures.curbside management strategies,and new parking facilities in Miami Beach and in the mainland. 3.2.4 Establish a transit plan that connects Downtown and the Convention Center and coordinate with the multimodal corridor planning study identified in recommendation 3.1. 3.3.1 Evaluate high-capacity transit connection near the 5th Street/Washington Avenue intersection. x 3.3 Implement future transit connection along 5th 3.3.2 Evaluate 5th Street between Washington Avenue and Ocean Drive as a transit plaza with a limited Street vehicular access zone. x 3.3.3 Implement streetscape improvements. 3.4 Implement Lincoln Road between Washington 3.4 1 Engage a consultant to develop a detailed design for the transit-only lanes(transit mall)and Ave and Collins Ave as a Transit Mall zone. transfer station on Lincoln Road between Washington Avenue and Collins Avenue. 3.5.1 As part of the multimodal corridor planning study identified in recommendation 3.1,evaluate the 3.5 Implement City's future transit plan along concept of a raised cycle track on both sides of the street in separate directions. Washington Avenue. 3.5.2 Incorporate within the City's Transportation Master Plan to include dedicated bus lanes and all required infrastructure Streetscape Improvements. 3.6.1 As part of the multimodal corridor planning study identified in recommendation 3.1,evaluate 6 Ocean Drive concepts as an expansion of potential parking strategies,the pedestrian-only option,and limited vehicle-access options ^) CREATE A BALANCED TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN I ummus Park 3.6.2 Change Ocean Dnve configuration to an organic path to emphasize the idea of Lummus Park CO 3 extending up to building facades 00 [Continuation Iron)previous novel 3.6.3 Include drop-off/valet areas on troth sides of Ocean Dove. 3.7.1 As part of the multimodal corridor planning study identified in recommendation 3.1,evaluate parking and curbside management strategies.and the feasibility and transportation network impacts x associated with a curbless(woonerf)shared-transit street design.and appropriate mitigations 3.7.2 Amend code to better regulate size of service vehicles and allowable times for deliveries x 3.7 Collins Avenue as a shared transit street. 3.7.3 Increase parking availability on Collins Avenue through the identification of shared parking options. transportation demand management measures.curbside management strategies.and new parking facilities identified as part of the multimodal corridor planning study identified in recommendation 3.1. 3.7.4 Establish circulator route and stops along Collins Avenue 3.7 5 Implement curbless(wooned)design including new streetscape and new public amenities 3.8.1 Further define zoning requirements that would encourage aesthetic improvements along the alleys. 3.8.2 Require buildings to maintain trash receptacles on private property and properly obstructed from x view 3.8.3 Have a landscape requirement x 3.8.4 Regulate loading hours. x 3.6.5 Ensure alley is clean and well lit x 3 8 Implement Alleyways Improvements. 3.8.6 Implement 5 ft setback requirement for new construction and renovations in order to widen the alleyway 3.8.7 Provide for an alley study and design guidelines for this District. x 3.8.8 Amend code to better regulate size of service vehicles and allowable times for deliveries. 3.8.9 Incentivize public arts initiatives x 3.8.10 Re-pave the alleyways x 3.8.11 Bury utility lines _ ( Al CI) )N PI AN.(.I I)ill MIAMI lit A(ii MXE District•Vision and Character for the District RECIJ M DATMEptFQTIO ITEMS(MI 2022 Near term:within 24 months/Mid-term within 60 months(2-5 years)/Long Term+5 years IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION ITEMS NEAR TERM MID-TERM LONG TERM 4 1 1 Engage economic consultant to evaluate applicable stiategic action dens including but not banned to a.)Effects on market demand related to prospective zoning modifications/change such as conversion of hotel to office space or allowing for increased FAR: b)Impacts on marketability of properties proposing use conversion including the opportunity to minimize parking requirements. c.)Evaluate the economic/financial benefit associated with modifying zoning regulations and/or repurposing space within existing structures(for example.converting under-utilized hotel space to office space): d)Create baseline methodology for determining the type and amount of incentive programs lie waiving impact lee,direct investment),as well as methodology for measuring results,and. e)Benchmarks for evaluating the social benefit that may result from various action items. 4.1.2 Incentivize renovation of existing buildings through limited FAR increase on blocks fronting Ocean Drive. 4 1 Improve zoning regulations to incentivize re- 4.1.3 Incentivize renovation of existing buildings through additional height on blocks fronting Collins BALANCE INTEREST OF PROPERTY&BUSINESS OWNERS, investment along main corridors and assets in the Avenue. RESIDENTS AND VISITORS,WHILE GENERATING District. INCENTIVES AND RESTRICTIONS TO GUIDE AND 4.1.4 Encourage larger holes rooms and guest rooftop amenities at second level and above. X IMPLEMENT DESIRED POLICIES 4.1.5 Encourage better food and beverage options through zoning adjustments. x 4.1.6 Amend zoning to create policy that no new music venues are allowed on Ocean Drive except x [The zoning Incentives Recommendations for Collins Avenue and between 9th Street-11th Street. 4 Ocean Dove in the WE Distnct will serve to assist the Crty m 4.1.7 Develop policy for objective standard of permitted sound decibels indoors and outdoors x implementing Itie goals and objectives of the ADCD Vision Plan.The N intent of the proposed changes to the existing MXE toning 4.1.8 Amend zoning to eliminate parking requirements for office uses along Collins Avenue x 0 designation is to balance the needs and maintain the character of 4.1.9 Allow office as conversions of interior buildings maintaining historic components along Collins x Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue but allow limited zoning incentives Avenue. that would encourage people to quickly reinvest in the properties 4 1.10 Allow for office common areas(reception,conference.and other publicly accessible uses)in x while protecting the histonc character of the District j ground floor of buildings along Collins Avenue 4.1.11 Further define zoning requirements to provide for contiguous North-South building aggregation at the back of the properties for office use along Collins Avenue 4 1.12 Provide incentives for new hotel developments similar to those on Washington Avenue and incorporate similar incentives for Collins Avenue and Ocean Drive 4 1 13 Establish incentives for Pertorming Arts Spaces that promote the objectives of the Park of the Arts concept. 4.2.1 Examine feasibility of extending the CRA overlay into the MXE district. x 4.2.2 Evaluate development incentives such as x -Wave or reduce partial or complete parking impact fees x 4 2 Establish development regulations and zoning -Increase FAR and height that would pay towards public purpose fund and/or arts funding source. x changes that would enhance the District character Reduce parking requirements. x and vision. -'Buyout'of condominium building(single owner approach) x 4.2.3 Establish"Sunset Provisions"for hotels incentives one year from effective date x 4.2.4 Increase FAR and height for the first 2-3 catalyst projects as a pilot. x 4 2.5 Examine use of CRA fund to enhanced Espanola Way pedestrian character East of Washington Avenue to Collins Avenue 5.NEXT STEPS DRAFT REPORT#4-02.14.2022 • In fall 2020 the City of Miami Beach engaged with Zyscovich for a Land Use.Mobility.and Economic Development study for the MXE District.for which the main goal is to create a District Wide Urban Design and Mobility Framework Plan.vision,and strategic action plan for the City's Culture.Art,and Mixed Use Entertainment District(MXE District). Since the Mayor convened the Art Deco Cultural District(ADCD)Panel in January of 2020.Zyscovich and its multidisciplinary team worked with the Panel and with members of City staff to develop a vision concept plan for the area.There has been over 20 ADCD Panel meetings and more than 40 City staff meetings.The team conducted several workshops during the ADCD Panel meetings further describe below: Workshop 1:'People First Design"was conducted on March 26.2021,by Gehl and Townsquare.It discussed concepts of street life&programming for Ocean Drive.Collins Avenue and Washington Avenue. CO Workshop 2"Economic Activity"was conducted on April 23.2021.by Lambert Advisory.It explained the district economics as it relates to retail.tourism.and entertainment potential. Workshop 3"Urban Design"was conducted on May 21.2021.by Zyscovrch.Jungles and Kittleson. This workshop presented a preliminary concept plan which gave an overview on urban design. open space.mobility.and transit concepts for the overall District. Workshop 4"Land Use"was conducted on June 18.2021.by Zyscovich.Lambert and Townsquare. This workshop explored concepts as it relates to a potential district management approach.inning. and land use changes as well as development incentives. Al)C.I) iN Pt Atv I Ii i ill MIAM)Ili A(II DRAFT REPORT#4 -02.14.2022 PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK r • 44 . ,yr yy. • e...._w , '31N�� •.., `�`i.>*'!0.is r',` '. R j 1111"11.v 1111 7...':": ' 1 I. IAIfi ' ... , ; k4 Pt—- --I oti . 3 is " N - UMW 4* 1 y . it I v .„. 1IFA E IIAIYiI!a i jll io i w..s i a . ��r � 2� fll� fl do ` �' . ,, � .. •00,:re *, . .,,. . . Ooja . _ . . , ... , zzoz VI, za-t#laod32J lAVHO