Loading...
Resolution 94-21041 • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-21041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION . OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE FOUR (4) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH1AND THE MIAMI-DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, SCHOOL OF JUSTICE AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ASSESSMENT CENTER FOR JOB ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT CENTER INSTRUMENT ADMINISTRATION • AND VALIDATION FOR THE POLICE OFFICER/TRAINEE CLASSIFICATION: REPEALING RESOLUTION NUMBER 94-21027 ADOPTED JANUARY 19, 1994. Whereas, the Consent Decree entered into by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the City of Miami Beach recognizes the continuing need of the City to hire entry-level Police Officer/Trainees in order to maintain adequate levels of public safety, and therefore allows for the administration of an Interim Hiring Program; and Whereas, the City has determined that additional Police Officer/Trainees need to be hired in order to maintain public safety; and Whereas, the provisions of the Consent Decree require that any Interim Hiring Program developed by the City must be agreed to by the DOJ and approved by the court; and Whereas, the City developed such an Interim Hiring Program and the DOJ and the court previously agreed to its use for one phase of Interim Hiring; and Whereas, it is projected that the DOJ will have agreed to the use of the Interim Hiring program for a second phase of Interim Hiring by January 14; 1994, or soon thereafter; and Whereas, the City believes that use of an Assessment Center process will fulfill the City's desires to adequately and appropriately evaluate what it believes to be the job-related skills of Police Officer/Trainee candidates; and Whereas, the successful use of the Assessment Center instrument, as a critical component of the Interim Hiring Program, in the First phase of Interim Hiring, yielded results consistent with the City's desire for diversity, resulting in the appointment of five Hispanic, five Black, and five non-Hispanic White Police Officer/Trainees; and Whereas, the Miami-Dade Community College (MDCC) Assessment Center develops, validates, and administers assessment instruments in compliance with Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Guidelines, the American Psychological Association's Testing Standards, and the Standards for Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operation; and Whereas, the MDCC Assessment Center has served over 25 law enforcement agencies in the State of Florida and assessed 6,000 entry-level and 5,000 promotional candidates; and Whereas, the MDCC Assessment Center's trained and experienced staff has developed, validated, and administered the job-related Assessment Center instrument for the Metropolitan Dade County Public Safety Department and has provided them with entry- level police selection services since 1983, evaluating over 3,400 entry-level candidates, and • has administered the Assessment Center instrument to 34 City of Miami Beach Police Officer/Trainee candidates in the first phase of Interim Hiring, and is therefore, thoroughly and uniquely familiar with the Assessment Center instrument and its validation; and • • r . • Whereas, the MDCC Assessment Center has agreed to perform a job analysis and validate the Assessment Center instrument for the job duties of a City of Miami Beach Police Officer/Trainee; and Whereas, the performance of a job analysis and test validation will help to insure the administration of fair job-related selection procedures and to protect the City against litigation under Federal law, especially Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; and Whereas, the aforementioned Assessment Center instrument is the property of Metropolitan Dade County Public Safety Department who has agreed to allow the City to utilize the instrument, for the second phase of the Interim Hiring Program; and Whereas, use of Metropolitan Dade County's Assessment Center instrument, as administered by the .MDCC Assessment Center is an integral part of the Interim Hiring Program developed by the City; and Whereas, the MDCC Assessment Center is able to provide role player and Assessor reorientation between January 31, and February 11, 1994,and to administer the Assessment Center instrument for the City of Miami Beach from February 21, through March 11, 1994; and Whereas, the Mayor and the City Commission wish to expedite the administration of the Police Officer/Trainee examination and deems it in the best interest of the City to waive the competitive bidding process and to award the attached contract to the MDCC Assessment Center; and Whereas, funding for this contract is available from the Police Department Professional Services budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and the City Commission hereby waive the competitive bidding process and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the four (4) attached Professional Services Agreements between the City and the MDCC Assessment Center, in consideration for an amount not to exceed $28,600 total for all four (4) Agreements, including all out-of-pocket and other expenses incurred by the MDCC Assessment Center. The Mayor and the City Commission authorize the City Manager to exercise the option of extending said contract for the evaluation of up to 25 additional candidates for an additional $175/candidate plus role player costs, not to exceed an additional $4,875 including all out-of-pocket and other expenses incurred by MDCC Assessment Center. This resolution repeals Resolution Number 94-21027 adopted on January 19, 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED this grid day of February , 1994. Attest: -C/42,t1 City Clerk, Richard E. Brown ayor, eymour elber Approved as to Form: 3 G- Office Of The City Attorney z- ({- �� S S Date • GPL:cp HR DEFT DEV:01/10/94 Disk:Comm&Res#2:\RESO#2AS.MDC CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TELEPHONE: (305) 673-7010 FAX: (305) 673-7782 COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. --161 -01k1 TO: Mayor Seymour Gelber and DATE: February 2, 1994 Members of the City Commission FROM: Roger M. Ca t City Manager • SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MIAMI-DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, SCHOOL OF JUSTICE AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION ASSESSMENT CENTER FOR JOB ANALYSIS AND ADMINISTRATION AND VALIDATION OF ASSESSMENT CENTER TEST INSTRUMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission waive the competitive bid process, in accordance with City Code 31A, Paragraph 10e, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the four (4) attached Professional Service Agreements with the Miami-Dade Community College (MDCC) Assessment Center to perform job analysis and to administer, validate, score, and report results of the Metropolitan Dade County Composite Interactive Assessment Center instrument to up to fifty(50) City of Miami Beach Police Officer/Trainee candidates. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND FUNDING: Not to exceed $28,600. -� Funds are available from the Police Department's Professional Services budget, Account Number 011.1110.000312. • BACKGROUND: The City of Miami Beach entered into a Consent Decree with the Department of Justice (DOJ) covering the hiring of Police Officer/Trainees. The Court provisionally entered the Consent Decree on July 28, 1992, and filed final entry on June 04, 1993. In the Consent Decree, all parties recognized the continuing need of the City to hire Police Officer/Trainees in order to maintain adequate levels of public safety. It has been determined that additional Police Officer/Trainees need to be hired in the immediate future to insure proper law enforcement staffing. Therefore, pursuant to the Consent Decree, the City developed an Interim Hiring Program. Under the terms of the Consent Decree, an Interim Hiring Program may be developed and used as a temporary selection procedure until permanent selection procedures are in place consistent with the Consent Decree. The DOJ and the court previously agreed that the City may use the Interim Hiring Program for one phase of the Interim Hiring. Since the City again needs to increase its law enforcement 30 staffing, the City sent a second proposal to the DOJ for utilization of the Interim Hiring Program for a second phase of Interim Hiring. It is projected that approval will have been received from the DOJ by January 14, 1994, or soon thereafter. ., AGENDA R_ _ ITEM 1 l �J DATE a _ BACKGROUND - continued: In addition, the MDCC Assessment Center instrument was successfully administered to thirty-four (34) City of Miami Beach Police Officer/Trainee candidates in the first phase of Interim Hiring. The results of the first Interim Hiring, using the Assessment Center instrument, were consistent with the City's desire for diversity. The first administration resulted in the appointment of five Hispanic, five Black, and five non-Hispanic White Police Officer/Trainees. The present public safety staffing needs are urgent, however, the City desires to use an adequate, appropriate, job-related, and fair method of evaluating the skills of Police Officer/Trainee candidates. For these reasons, the Interim Hiring Program utilizes the Assessment Center Interactive instrument which was developed and validated for Metropolitan Dade County entry-level Police Officers. The process was developed and is • administered by trained and experienced staff at the MDCC Assessment Center. The Assessment Center has provided selection services to Metro-Dade County since 1983, and has successfully evaluated over 3,400 entry-level Police Officer candidates for that agency. Metro Dade County has agreed to allow the City to utilize their Interactive Assessment Center instrument (again saving the City at least $8,000) for the second phase of the Interim Hiring Program. To further the efforts to administer a fair and job-related selection procedure, the attached agreement for Professional Services includes job analysis and validation of the Assessment Center instrument for the duties of,a City of Miami Beach Police Officer. One combined Professional Service Agreement was approved by the Mayor and the City Commission on January 19, 1994. The one previously approved Agreement is now being separated into four Agreements to expedite Police Officer hiring. ANALYSIS: In order to meet the Consent Decree requirements as well as the City's time and quality requirements, the Interim Hiring Program was developed so that candidates are evaluated in a manner that the City believes to be fair, job-related and expeditious. A second use of this plan, including the use of Metro Dade County's Interactive Assessment Center instrument at the MDCC Assessment Center, although not guaranteeing there will be no challenges to the City's developed Program, is expected to be agreed to by the DOJ. The Assessment Center process can be administered February 21, through 11, 1994. The City Manager may exercise the option of having the MDCC Assessment Center evaluate up to 25 additional candidates for an additional $175/candidate plus role player costs (not to exceed an additional $4,875). This refers to Agreement Number 4 below. On January 19, 1994, the Mayor and the City•Commission approved a combined contract with MDCC for the services listed below. To accelerate the Police Officer hiring process, the services are being divided into four (4) separate Professional Service Agreements. The four (4) Agreements cover the same services for the same cost as was approved January 19, 1994. The Agreements are now separated as follows: Agreement 1 - Assessor Reorientation and Role Players for 50 candidates - $1,850 Agreement 2 - Candidate Assessment of 50 candidates - $8,750 31 • ANALYSIS - continued: Agreement 3 - Job Analysis and Validation $18,000 Agreement 4 - Additional 25 candidate assessment and Role Players per the City Manager's discretion - $4,875. CONCLUSION: In view of the,fact that the MDCC Assessment Center is thoroughly familiar with the classification of entry-level Police Officer/Trainee, has developed, validated, and administered a valid selection process for Metro-Dade County for the past 10 years, and has successfully administered the Assessment Center instrument for the City of Miami Beach, Commission approval is requested authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute this Agreement for Professional Services. GPL:cp Comm&Reso#2:\COMMOASS.MDC Attachments • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PURCHASE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT; MADE THE 2nd DAY OF FEBRUARY IN THE YEAR OF 1994, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ("CITY") AND MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, SCHOOL OF JUSTICE & SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ASSESSMENT CENTER, ("CONSULTANT"), FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES AS STATED HEREIN: TO PERFORM ROLE PLAYERS AND ASSESSOR REORIENTATION BETWEEN JANUARY 31, AND MARCH 11, 1994. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: TOTAL ASSESSMENT CENTER PRICE INCLUDING RELATED MATERIAL, ROLE PLAYERS, AND ASSESSOR REORIENTATION, NOT TO EXCEED ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS($1,850)INCLUDING ALL OUT-OF-POCKET AND OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING AN INVOICE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION OF ASSESSMENT CENTER AND AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE OTHER PROJECT PHASES. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR,AND NOT AN AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY. THE CONSULTANT AGREES TO ADHERE TO AND BE GOVERNED BY THE METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE (NO. 72-82),AS AMENDED,AND BY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CHARTER AND CODE, WHICH ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN,IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONTRACT CONDITIONS HEREUNDER. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN EFFECT THROUGH MARCH 11, 1994. FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE CONSULTANT ARE PAYABLE FROM CODE NO. 011.1120.000312 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,850,AND SAID AMOUNT MUST INCLUDE ALL FEES AND EXPENSES PAID TO AND BY THE CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE ALTERED, EXTENDED AND AMENDED ONLY UPON THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES. CONSULTANT SHALL NOT ASSIGN, TRANSFER OR SUBCONTRACT ITS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. CMB HUMAN RESOURCES 3056 37529 F.,O1 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE OF RACE,COLOR,RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH, MARITAL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP, INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS, DISABILITY, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION. THE CONSULTANT SHALL TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE APPLICANTS ARE EMPLOYED AND THAT EMPLOYEES ARE TREATED DURING THEIR EMPLOYMENT WPTHOUT REGARD TO THEIR RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH,MARITAL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP,INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS,DISABILITY,OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION.SUCH ACTION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: EMPLOYMENT, UPGRADING,DEMOTION,OR TERMINATION;RECRUITMENT OR RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING; LAYOFF OR TERMINATION; RATES OF PAY, OR OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION; AND SELECTION FOR TRAINING,INCLUDING APPRENTICESHIP. WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES, THE CONSULTANT SHALL EXERCISE THAT DEGREE OF SKILL, CARE, EFFICIENCY AND DILIGENCE NORMALLY EXERCISED BY RECOGNIZED PROFESSIONALS WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPARABLE SERVICES. IN ITS PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES,THE CONSULTANT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS,ORDINANCES,AND GUIDELINES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ADA,EEO REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES. THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY,AT ANY TIME,FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. IN THE EVENT OF SUCH TERMINATION,THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID A SUM EQUAL TO PAYMENT DUE UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, PROVIDED CONSULTANT IS CONTINUING TO PROVIDE ALL SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION. CONSULTANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS, THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS,EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS,FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL ACTIONS, CLAIMS,LIABILITIES,LOSSES,AND EXPENSES,INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ATTORNEYS' FEES, FOR PERSONAL, ECONOMIC OR BODILY INJURY, WRONGFUL DEATH, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, IN LAW OR IN EQUITY, WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSION OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT 2 OF THE CONSULTANT, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSULTANT'S PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT;AND TO THAT EXTENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL PAY ALL SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES AND SHALL PAY ALL SUCH COSTS AND JUDGEMENTS WHICH MAY ISSUE FROM ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES,AND SHALL PAY ALL COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES EXPENDED BY THE CITY IN THE DEFENSE OF SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES, INCLUDING APPEALS. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE TOTAL COMPENSATION TO THE CONSULTANT FOR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT IS THE SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION FROM THE CITY TO THE CONSULTANT FOR THE CONSULTANT'S INDEMNITY AGREEMENT. THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, FROM AND AGAINST ANY ACTIONS OR CLAIMS WHICH ARISE OR ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF THE CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS. THE PARTIES EACH AGREE TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY PROMPT NOTICE OF ANY CLAIM COMING TO ITS KNOWLEDGE THAT IN ANY WAY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AFFECTS THE OTHER PARTY. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE BREACH HEREOF, SHALL BE SETTLED BY ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES OF THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,AND THE ARBITRATION AWARD SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON THE PARTIES HERETO AND SUBJECT TO NO APPEAL, AND SHALL DEAL WITH THE QUESTION OF THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION AND ALL MATTERS RELATED THERETO. IN THAT REGARD,THE PARTIES SHALL MUTUALLY SELECT ONE ARBITRATOR,BUT TO THE EXTENT THE PARTIES CANNOT AGREE UPON THE ARBITRATOR,THEN THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SHALL APPOINT ONE. JUDGMENT UPON THE AWARD RENDERED MAY BE ENTERED INTO ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR APPLICATION MAY BE MADE TO SUCH COURT FOR AN ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM OTHER THAN A CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,OR THE BREACH HEREOF,INCLUDING ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM RELATING TO THE RIGHT TO SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE,SHALL BE SETTLED BY LITIGATION AND NOT ARBITRATION. 3 THE CITY DESIRES TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT ONLY IF IN SO DOING THE CITY CAN PLACE A LIMIT ON CITY'S LIABILITY FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR MONEY DAMAGES DUE TO AN ALLEGED BREACH BY THE CITY OF THIS AGREEMENT, SO THAT ITS LIABILITY FOR ANY SUCH BREACH NEVER EXCEEDS THE SUM OF$1,850. CONSULTANT HEREBY EXPRESSES ITS WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTANT'S RECOVERY FROM THE CITY FOR ANY DAMAGE ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO BE LIMITED TO A • MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,850 LESS THE AMOUNT OF ALL FUNDS ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. ACCORDINGLY, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER TERM OR CONDITION OF THIS AGREEMENT,CONSULTANT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO CONSULTANT FOR DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF $1,850 WHICH AMOUNT SHALL BE REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS.AGREEMENT,FOR ANY ACTION OR CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT ARISING OUT OF THE PERFORMANCE OR NON-PERFORMANCE OF ANY OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED UPON THE CITY BY THIS AGREEMENT. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH OR ELSEWHERE IN THIS AGREEMENT IS IN ANY WAY INTENDED TO BE A WAIVER OF THE LIMITATION PLACED UPON CITY'S LIABILITY AS SET FORTH IN FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 768.28. 4 ALL NOTICES UNDER THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING: CONSULTANT: MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF JUSTICE AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION ASSESSMENT CENTER 11380 NW 27 AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33167-3495 CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 WITH COPIES TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida municip.4 corporation B; A MA O , SEYMOUR GELBER ATTEST: CITY CLERK, RICHARD E. BROWN By 2 (1)g}-14-•_../- CONSULTANT APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY DATE GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTR#2 5 MIAlVII BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT COST PROPOSAL Training Provide 1/2 day of assessor refresher training $ 250.00 Compensate six (6) role players for one 600.00 refresher training day - $100 per day Compensate two (2) role players for up to 1,000.00 five (5) performance days at $100 per day (combined) $1,850.00 GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTR#2 6 - , CITY OF MIAMI BEACH • PURCHASE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, MADE THE 2nd DAY OF FEBRUARY IN THE YEAR OF 1994, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ("CITY") AND MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, SCHOOL OF JUSTICE & SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ASSESSMENT CENTER, ("CONSULTANT"), FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES AS STATED HEREIN: TO ADMINISTER, SCORE, AND REPORT RESULTS OF THE METRO-DADE COMPOSITE INTERACTIVE BURGLARY/DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE EXERCISE FOR UP TO FIFTY (50) POLICE OFFICER/TRAINEE CANDIDATES FROM FEBRUARY 21, THROUGH MARCH 11, 1994. AT THE CITY'S DISCRETION, THE CITY MANAGER WILL HAVE THE AUTHORITY AND THE OPTION OF EXTENDING THIS AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE THE EVALUATION OF UP TO 25 ADDITIONAL CANDIDATES FOR AN ADDITIONAL$175/CANDIDATE,PLUS ROLE PLAYER FEES NOT TO EXCEED AN ADDITIONAL TOTAL OF SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS($6,000)INCLUDING ALL OUT-OF-POCKET AND OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CONSULTANT. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: TOTAL ASSESSMENT CENTER PRICE INCLUDING RELATED MATERIAL, CANDIDATE ASSESSMENT COST IS NOT TO EXCEED EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($8,750) INCLUDING ALL OUT-OF-POCKET AND OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING AN INVOICE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION OF ASSESSMENT CENTER AND AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE OTHER PROJECT PHASES. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR,AND NOT AN AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY. THE CONSULTANT AGREES TO ADHERE TO AND BE GOVERNED BY THE METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE (NO.72-82),AS AMENDED,AND BY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CHARTER AND CODE, WHICH ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN,IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONTRACT CONDITIONS HEREUNDER. CMB HUMAN RESOURCES 3056737529 P. 02 THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN EFFECT THROUGH MARCH 11, 1994. FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE CONSULTANT ARE PAYABLE FROM CODE NO. 011.1120.000312 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,750,AND SAID AMOUNT MUST INCLUDE ALL FEES AND EXPENSES PAID TO AND BY THE CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE ALTERED, EXTENDED AND AMENDED ONLY UPON THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES. CONSULTANT SHALL NOT ASSIGN, TRANSFER OR SUBCONTRACT ITS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE OF RACE,COLOR,RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH, MARITAL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP, INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS, DISABILITY, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION. THE CONSULTANT SHALL TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE APPLICANTS ARE EMPLOYED AND THAT EMPLOYEES ARE TREATED DURING THEIR EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT REGARD TO THEIR RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH,MARITAL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP,INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS,DISABILITY,OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION.SUCH ACTION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: EMPLOYMENT, UPGRADING,DEMOTION, OR TERMINATION;RECRUITMENT OR RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING; LAYOFF OR TERMINATION; RATES OF PAY, OR OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION; AND SELECTION FOR TRAINING, INCLUDING APPRENTICESHIP. WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OP THE SERVICES, THE CONSULTANT SHALL EXERCISE THAT DEGREE OF SKILL, CARE, EFFICIENCY AND DILIGENCE NORMALLY EXERCISED BY RECOGNIZED PROFESSIONALS WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPARABLE SERVICES. IN ITS PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES,THE CONSULTANT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS,ORDINANCES,AND GUIDELINES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,ADA, EEO REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES. THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY,AT ANY TIME,FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. IN THE EVENT OF SUCH TERMINATION,THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID 2 A SUM EQUAL TO PAYMENT DUE UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, PROVIDED CONSULTANT IS CONTINUING TO PROVIDE ALL SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION. CONSULTANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS, THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS,EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS,FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL ACTIONS, CLAIMS,LIABILITIES,LOSSES,AND EXPENSES,INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ATTORNEYS' FEES, FOR PERSONAL, ECONOMIC OR BODILY INJURY, WRONGFUL DEATH, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, IN LAW OR IN EQUITY, WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSION OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF THE CONSULTANT, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSULTANT'S PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT;AND TO THAT EXTENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL PAY ALL SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES AND SHALL PAY ALL SUCH COSTS AND JUDGEMENTS WHICH MAY ISSUE FROM ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES,AND SHALL PAY ALL COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES EXPENDED BY THE CITY IN THE DEFENSE OF SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES, INCLUDING APPEALS. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE TOTAL COMPENSATION TO THE CONSULTANT FOR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT IS THE SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION FROM THE CITY TO THE CONSULTANT FOR THE CONSULTANT'S INDEMNITY AGREEMENT. THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, FROM AND AGAINST ANY ACTIONS OR CLAIMS WHICH ARISE OR ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF THE CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS. THE PARTIES EACH AGREE TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY PROMPT NOTICE OF ANY CLAIM COMING TO ITS KNOWLEDGE THAT IN ANY WAY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AFFECTS THE OTHER PARTY. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE BREACH HEREOF, SHALL BE SETTLED BY ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES OF THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,AND THE ARBITRATION AWARD SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON THE PARTIES HERETO AND SUBJECT TO NO APPEAL, AND SHALL DEAL WITH THE QUESTION OF THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION AND ALL MATTERS RELATED THERETO. IN THAT REGARD,THE PARTIES SHALL MUTUALLY SELECT ONE ARBITRATOR,BUT TO THE EXTENT 3 . THE.PARTIES CANNOT AGREE UPON THE ARBITRATOR,THEN THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SHALL APPOINT ONE. JUDGMENT UPON THE AWARD RENDERED MAY BE ENTERED INTO ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR APPLICATION MAY BE MADE TO SUCH COURT FOR AN ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM OTHER THAN A CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,OR THE BREACH HEREOF,INCLUDING ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM RELATING TO THE RIGHT TO SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, SHALL BE SETTLED BY LITIGATION AND NOT ARBITRATION. THE CITY DESIRES TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT ONLY IF IN SO DOING THE CITY CAN PLACE A LIMIT ON CITY'S LIABILITY FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR MONEY DAMAGES DUE TO AN ALLEGED BREACH BY THE CITY OF THIS AGREEMENT, SO THAT ITS LIABILITY FOR ANY SUCH BREACH NEVER EXCEEDS THE SUM OF$8,750. CONSULTANT HEREBY EXPRESSES ITS WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTANT'S RECOVERY FROM THE CITY FOR ANY DAMAGE ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $8,750 LESS THE AMOUNT OF ALL FUNDS ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. ACCORDINGLY, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER TERM OR CONDITION OF THIS AGREEMENT,CONSULTANT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO CONSULTANT FOR DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF $8,750 WHICH AMOUNT SHALL BE REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT,FOR ANY ACTION OR CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT ARISING OUT OF THE PERFORMANCE OR NON-PERFORMANCE OF ANY OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED UPON THE CITY BY THIS AGREEMENT. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH OR ELSEWHERE IN THIS AGREEMENT IS IN ANY WAY INTENDED TO BE A WAIVER OF THE LIMITATION PLACED UPON CITY'S LIABILITY AS SET FORTH IN FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 768.28. • ALL NOTICES UNDER THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING: CONSULTANT: MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF JUSTICE AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION ASSESSMENT CENTER 11380 NW 27 AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33167-3495 CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 WITH COPIES TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Florida munic. 1 corporation OR, OUR G ER ATTEST: CITY CLERK, RICHARD E. BROWN By CONS TANT APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 1 - Z t- �..I DATE GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTRAC1.CON 5 MIANII BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT COST PROPOSAL Candidate Cost $175 Per candidate $5,250 - $8,750 To assess 30 - 50 candidates, administer process, monitor and record evaluation, prepare report, provide feedback, etc. GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTRAC1.CON 6 • • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PURCHASE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, MADE THE 2nd DAY OF FEBRUARY IN THE YEAR OF 1994, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ("CITY') AND MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, SCHOOL OF JUSTICE & SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ASSESSMENT CENTER, ("CONSULTANT"), FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES AS STATED HEREIN: TO PERFORM JOB ANALYSIS AND TO VALIDATE AND REPORT RESULTS OF THE METRO-DADE COMPOSITE INTERACTIVE BURGLARY/DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE EXERCISE. THE PARTIES HERETO FURTHER AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: TOTAL ASSESSMENT CENTER PRICE INCLUDING RELATED MATERIAL, JOB ANALYSIS, AND VALIDATION AND TECHNICAL REPORTS TO BE SUPPLIED IS NOT TO EXCEED EIGHTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($18,000) INCLUDING ALL OUT-OF-POCKET AND OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING AN INVOICE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION OF ASSESSMENT CENTER AND AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE OTHER PROJECT PHASES. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR,AND NOT AN AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY. THE CONSULTANT AGREES TO ADHERE TO AND BE GOVERNED BY THE METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE (NO.72-82),AS AMENDED,AND BY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CHARTER AND CODE,WHICH ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN,IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONTRACT CONDITIONS HEREUNDER. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE VALIDATION STUDY AND DELIVERY OF THE JOB ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION TECHNICAL REPORTS. FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE CONSULTANT ARE PAYABLE FROM CODE NO. 011.1120.000312 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $18,000, AND SAID AMOUNT MUST INCLUDE ALL FEES AND EXPENSES PAID TO AND BY THE CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. OMB HUMAN RESOURCES 3056737529 P. 02 IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE ALTERED, EXTENDED AND AMENDED ONLY UPON THE WRITTEN CONSENT or BOTH PARTIES. CONSULTANT SHALL NOT ASSIGN, TRANSFER OR SUBCONTRACT ITS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE OF RACE,COLOR,RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH, MARITALL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP, INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS, DISABILITY, OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION. THE CONSULTANT SHALL TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE APPLICANTS ARE EMPLOYED AND THAT EMPLOYEES ARE TREATED DURING THEIR EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT REGARD TO THEIR RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,ANCESTRY,GENDER,AGE,NATIONAL ORIGIN,PLACE OF BIRTH,MARITAL STATUS, CITIZENSHIP,INTENDING CITIZENSHIP STATUS,DISABILITY,OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION.SUCH ACTION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: EMPLOYMENT, UPGRADING,DEMOTION,OR'TERMINATION;RECRUITMENT OR RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING; LAYOFF OR TERMINATION; RATES OF PAY, OR OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION; AND SELECTION FOR TRAINING, INCLUDING APPRENTICESHIP. WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES, THE CONSULTANT SHALL EXERCISE THAT DEGREE OF SKILL, CARE, EFFICIENCY AND DILIGENCE NORMALLY EXERCISED:AY RECOGNIZED PROFESSIONALS WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPARABLE SERVICES. IN ITS PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES,THE CONSULTANT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS,ORDINANCES,AND GUIDELINES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF THE CITY, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,ADA,EEO REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES. THIS AGREEMENT MAY BE TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY,AT ANY TIME,FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. IN THE EVENT OF SUCH TERMINATION, THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID A SUM EQUAL TO PAYMENT DUE UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, PROVIDED CONSULTANT IS CONTINUING TO PROVIDE ALL SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION. 2 • CONSULTANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS, THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS,EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS,FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL ACTIONS, CLAIMS,LIABILITIES,LOSSES,AND EXPENSES,INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ATTORNEYS' FEES, FOR PERSONAL, ECONOMIC OR BODILY INJURY, WRONGFUL DEATH, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, IN LAW OR IN EQUITY, WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM THE NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSION OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF THE CONSULTANT, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSULTANT'S PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT;AND TO THAT EXTENT,THE CONSULTANT SHALL PAY ALL SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES AND SHALL PAY ALL SUCH COSTS AND JUDGEMENTS WHICH MAY ISSUE FROM ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES,AND SHALL PAY ALL COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES EXPENDED BY THE CITY IN THE DEFENSE OF SUCH CLAIMS AND LOSSES, INCLUDING APPEALS. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE TOTAL COMPENSATION TO THE CONSULTANT FOR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT IS THE SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION FROM THE CITY TO THE CONSULTANT FOR THE CONSULTANT'S INDEMNITY AGREEMENT. THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT INCLUDE THE OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, FROM AND AGAINST ANY ACTIONS OR CLAIMS WHICH ARISE OR ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN FROM NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OR OTHER WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF THE CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS. THE PARTIES EACH AGREE TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY PROMPT NOTICE OF ANY CLAIM COMING TO ITS KNOWLEDGE THAT IN ANY WAY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AFFECTS THE OTHER PARTY. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE BREACH HEREOF, SHALL BE SETTLED BY ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES OF THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,AND THE ARBITRATION AWARD SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING UPON THE PARTIES HERETO AND SUBJECT TO NO APPEAL, AND SHALL DEAL WITH THE QUESTION OF THE COSTS OF ARBITRATION AND ALL MATTERS RELATED THERETO. IN THAT REGARD,THE PARTIES SHALL MUTUALLY SELECT ONE ARBITRATOR,BUT TO THE EXTENT THE PARTIES CANNOT AGREE UPON THE ARBITRATOR,THEN THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SHALL APPOINT ONE. JUDGMENT UPON THE AWARD RENDERED MAY BE ENTERED INTO ANY COURT HAVING JURISDICTION, OR APPLICATION MAY BE MADE TO SUCH COURT FOR AN ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT. ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM OTHER 3 THAN A CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,OR THE BREACH HEREOF,INCLUDING ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM RELATING TO THE RIGHT TO SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE,SHALL BE SETTLED BY LITIGATION AND NOT ARBITRATION. THE CITY DESIRES TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT ONLY IF IN SO DOING THE CITY CAN PLACE A LIMIT ON CITY'S LIABILITY FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR MONEY DAMAGES DUE TO AN ALLEGED BREACH BY THE CITY OF THIS AGREEMENT, SO THAT ITS LIABILITY FOR ANY SUCH BREACH NEVER EXCEEDS THE SUM OF$18,000. CONSULTANT HEREBY EXPRESSES ITS WILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTANT'S RECOVERY FROM THE CITY FOR ANY DAMAGE ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT TO BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF$18,000 LESS THE AMOUNT OF ALL FUNDS ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. ACCORDINGLY, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER TERM OR CONDITION OF THIS AGREEMENT,CONSULTANT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO CONSULTANT FOR DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF$18,000 WHICH AMOUNT SHALL BE REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID BY THE CITY TO CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT,FOR ANY ACTION OR CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT ARISING OUT OF THE PERFORMANCE OR NON-PERFORMANCE OF ANY OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED UPON THE CITY BY THIS AGREEMENT. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH OR ELSEWHERE IN THIS AGREEMENT IS IN ANY WAY INTENDED TO BE A WAIVER OF THE LIMITATION PLACED UPON CITY'S LIABILITY AS SET FORTH IN FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 768.28. • 4 ALL NOTICES UNDER THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING: CONSULTANT: MIAMI DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF JUSTICE AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION ASSESSMENT CENTER 11380 NW 27 AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33167-3495 CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 , WITH COPIES TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 CITY OF MIAMI Blorida : çb0J ER ATTEST: .e.--(et:-C.A.#,._0.."...szk C.---Ta-N-eve......„. CITY CLERK, RICHARD E. BROWN I ,/r� By �, , ��{'' CONSU ANT APPROVED AS TO FORM: J D OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY I - Z1— �`� DATE GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTR#3 5 • MIAMI BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT COST PROPOSAL Job Analysis $ 8,000 A job analysis will be conducted to assess job content so that knowledge, skills, and abilities and other requisite employee specifications can be identified. A list of critical task statements and their prerequisite knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA's) will be identified. II. Validation $10,000 A content validation strategy will be conducted to determine the commonalities that exist between the critical KSA's derived from the Metro-Dade Police Department job analysis and those derived from the Miami Beach Police Department job analysis. Next, a criterion-referenced predictive validation strategy will be conducted to determine the viability of the assessment center in predicting success in the training academy and also to determine how well the assessment center predicts success on the job. $18,000.00 GPL:cp H.R.DEPT REV:01/10/94 J-RFP DISK:\CONTR#3 6