473-2004 RDA Reso
RESOLUTION NO. ' 473-2004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF
THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RATIFYING AMENDMENT No. 13A TO THE AGREEMENT
WITH CAMP, DRESSER AND MCKEE (CDM) AND
APPROPRIATING CORRESPONDING FUNDING IN THE
AMOUNTS OF $25,478.40 FROM CITY CENTER
REDEVELOPMENT AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS AND
$424.64 FROM SOUTH POINTE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING
SERVICES FOR UPGRADING WATER AND SEWER
PUMPING STATIONS; SAID AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND FIELD
OVERSIGHT SERVICES (TASKS 2.0 AND 3.0) FOR THE
WATER AND WASTE WATER PUMP STATIONS
UPGRADES PROJECT, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$424,640.
WHEREAS, on July 8, 1992, the Mayor and City Commission approved Resolution
No. 92-20540, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement between the
City and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM) to provide engineering services for
upgrading sewer and water pumping stations (Agreement); and
WHEREAS, because of CDM's familiarity and expertise with the City's sanitary
sewer system, the City has, in past years, amended the Agreement to provide additional
professional engineering services to the City; and
WHEREAS, CDM has served as the engineering consultant on the Water and
Wastewater Pump Stations Upgrade Project (Project); and
WHEREAS, on February 1999, Resolution No. 99-23061, awarded a
$17,692,568.00 contractto Felix Equities, Inc. (FEI), pursuantto Bid No. 99-97/98, for the
Project; and
WHEREAS, since the commencement of construction, several delays related to
coordination of unforeseen conditions, omissions and deletions occurred; and
WHEREAS, due to many issues with the performance of FElon the Project, on July
10, 2002, and pursuant to Article 8.8 of the City's contract with FEI, the Administration
recommended that the City Commission remove the prosecution of work from FEI and
authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to prosecute the remainder of the work; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission approved this request on that date, through
Resolution No. 2002-24924; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2003, the deadline for bids pursuant to a modified bid
process for a replacement contractor, bids were received by the City's Procurement
Division; and
WHEREAS, only one contractor was deemed qualified and responsive, and the City
determined that it would be in the City's best interest to proceed with Widell, Inc. to
complete the Project; and
WHEREAS, additional services for COM to perform construction administration and
field oversight services are needed for the completion of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Administration recommends an amendment to the Agreement with
COM, for the additional services, in an amount not to exceed $424,640; and
WHEREAS, as stated in Resolution No. 2004-25465, the initial amount appropriated
for COM's services was only an estimate since the City and COM have not yet begun
negotiations regarding the scope and amount of the fee; and
WHEREAS, negotiations with COM have been completed, in a total amount not to
exceed $924,640, of which $500,000 were appropriated in Resolution No. 2004-25465;
$424,640 are hereby required for Tasks 2.0 and 3.0; and
WHEREAS, funding for these additional services is available in the amounts of:
$25,478.40 from City Center Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds; $424.64 from
South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds; and $398,736 from Series 1995
Water and Sewer Bond Interest; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that when the City Administration and City Attorney
finalize an acceptable settlement with FEl's surety company, United Fidelity and Guaranty
Company (USF&G), funding will be reimbursed to the funding source.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND
MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, that the Chairman and
Members of the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency ratify Amendment No.13A to the
Agreement with Camp, Dresser and McKee (COM) to provide engineering services for
upgrading water and sewer pumping stations; said Amendment providing for construction
administration and field oversight services for the Water and Waste Water Pump Stations
Upgrades Project, in an amount not to exceed $424,640; and further appropriate
corresponding funds, in the amounts of $25,478.40 from City Center Redevelopment Tax
Increment Funds and $424.64 from South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment
Funds.
AND ADOPTED this 7th day of July ,2004.
v n . I .APPROVED AS TO
~ r ~(tl>-1:ORM & LANGUAGE
AIRMAN ECRETARY EXECUTION
T:\AGENDA\2004\JuI0704\Regular\Pump Stations RDA Reso CDM.doc
~~ 7~bf
General Coun~\t-....
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
Ratify additional services to CDM for the construction administration and resident project representative for the Water and
Waste Water Pump Stations Upgrades appropriating funds in the amount of $25,478.40 form City Center RDA TIF and
$424.64 from South Pointe RDA TIF.
Item Summary/Recommendation:
On February 1999, Resolution 99-23061 awarded a $17,692,568.00 contract to Felix Equities, Inc. (FEI) pursuant to
Invitation to Bid No. 99-97/98 for the Water and Waste Water Pump Station Upgrades. On June 18, 2002, the Administration
certified FEI in Default. On July 10, 2002, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 2002-24924, which declared
an emergency situation and waived the formal competitive bidding requirements for the project. Due to the continued
deterioration of the pump stations, the City Administration decided in late 2002 that it was not in the City's interest to
continue to wait for the conclusion of the FEI/Surety issues noted above before continuing the project. Therefore, the
Administration decided to complete the previously approved informal bid process to secure a replacement contractor.
Camp Dresser & Mckee, Inc (CDM), the consultant for the above referenced project has guided the City along the extended
process of the specific project.
On January 14, 2004, Resolution 2004-25465 awarded a Contract to Widell Inc. in the amount of $17,352,615, for the Water
and Waste Water Pump Stations Upgrades pursuant to Bid NO.1 0-02/03. In addition, the Resolution stated that the amount
of $500,000 appropriated for CDM as a consultant for the project was only an estimate due to the fact that the City had not
begun negotiations regarding the final scope of the project and corresponding fees.
The City and CDM finalized negotiations for additional services to include the additional tasks of the review of "Shop
Drawings, Samples and Miscellaneous Issues" (Task 2.0) and "Resident Project Representative Services" (Task 3.0). The
final negotiated amount for CDM's efforts on this project is $924,640, of which $500,000 was approved by the Commission
through Resolution 2004-25465.
Funding for these additional services is available from Series 1995 Water/Sewer Bond Interest, City Center RDA TIF and
South Pointe RDA TIF, with the understanding that when the City Administration and City Attorney are able to negotiate an
acceptable settlement with the surety company United Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) for the previous contractor
Felix Equities and if the appropriate Courts approve the settlement; funding will be reimbursed to the funding source.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
IN/A
Financial Information:
Source of
Funds:
City Center RDA TIF
South Pointe RDA TIF
$25,903.04
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
3B
7-7-0lf
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl.gov
m
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM
To:
Chairman and Members of the Board
Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
Date: July 7,2004
From:
Jorge M. Gonzalez
Executive Director a ,.,,-~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RATIFYING ADDITIONAL SERVICES
FOR CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND FIELD OVERSIGHT
SERVICES TO CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE (COM); AND APPROPRIATING
THE AMOUNTS OF $25,478.40 FROM CITY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT
AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS, AND $424.64 FROM SOUTH POINTE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS.
Subject:
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolutions.
FUNDING
Funding in the amount of $398,736.96 is available from Series 1995 Water/Sewer Interest,
$25,478.40 from City Center RDA TIF and $424.64 from South Pointe RDA TIF.
Once the City Administration and City Attorney are able to negotiate an acceptable
settlement with the United Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G), Surety Company in
the dispute with the previous contractor, Felix Equities, Inc., and if the appropriate courts
approve the settlement agreement, funding will be reimbursed.
ANALYSIS
On February 1999, Resolution 99-23061 awarded a $17,692,568.00 contract to Felix
Equities, Inc. (FEI) pursuant to Bid No.99-97/98 for the Water and Waste Water Pump
Station Upgrades in the City of Miami Beach.
On May 21 , 2001, FEI submitted a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) to the City's
consulting engineer Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (COM) for approximately $1.7 million,
representing increased costs the Contractor attributed to delays associated with the issues
referenced above. Repeated City requests for FEI to submit specific documentation to
support the REA were not provided in sufficient detail to allow a thorough analysis by COM
or City staff. Without this information, the City could not evaluate the Contractor's REA.
On June 7, 2002, the City Administration sent FEI a Notice of Default due to the lack of
progress in the project and provided FEI 10 days to correct the lack of progress issues.
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum
Water and Wastewater Pump Station Upgrade CDM Additional Services
July 7,2004
Page 2 of 3
Upon FEl's failure to properly remedy its lack of progress, the City Administration certified
FEI in default on June 18, 2002. Subsequently, on July 10, 2002, and pursuant to Article
8.8 of the City's contract with FEI, the Administration recommended that the City
Commission remove the prosecution of work from the hands of FEI and authorize the City
Manager, or designee, to prosecute the remainder of the work.. Pursuant to Article 8.8, any
remaining funds in the contract would be returned to the contractor, or if the remaining
funds were insufficient, the contractor, after completion of the work, would be required to
pay the City the cost overrun. This action was consistent with the contract requirements.
The City Commission approved this request on that date through Resolution 2002-24924.
On July 9,2002, the day before the City Commission action noted above, Linc Net, the
parent company of FEI, filed for bankruptcy and an automatic stay was placed on the FEI
contract. This action precluded the City from implementing any action regarding FEI and
FEI's contract without Bankruptcy Court approval. At approximately the same time, FEI
and its surety company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G),
requested a meeting with the City to discuss potential settlement options. These initial
discussions did not produce a settlement that met the interests of all parties. Therefore,
the City invoked the Performance Bond on the project provided by USF&G in August 2002.
USF&G declined to honor its Performance Bond based on the bankruptcy of FEI.
Subsequent demands and settlement discussions continued throughout the balance of
2002 and into 2003. Negotiations on this matter have continued throughout between the
City and USF&G in order to obtain a resolution on their obligations under the bond.
Due to the continued deterioration of the pump stations, the City Administration decided in
late 2002 that it was not in the City's interest to continue to wait for the conclusion of the
FEIISurety issues noted above before continuing the project. Therefore, the Administration
decided to complete the previously approved informal bid process to secure a replacement
contractor.
On June 10, 2003, the deadline for bids pursuant to Invitation to Bid No. 10-02/03, bid
proposals were received at the Procurement Department. Only one contractor, who was
deemed qualified and responsive, submitted an initial bid proposal and the City decided to
proceed with negotiations. The initial bid by Widell, Inc. was in the amount of $20,970,000.
The City entered into long and very detailed negotiations with Widell. CI P staff and COM
as well as personnel from Widell evaluated every item in the bid proposal, reviewed
carefully the established scope, and reviewed the documents submitted for bid, etc., and in
the end agreed upon a final cost to complete the project of $17,352,615; as approved in
Resolution 2004-25465, dated January 14, 2004.
Throughout this effort the City has counted on the unconditional support of COM to ensure
the correct decision for the City is made. Resolution 2004-25465 stated that the amount for
services awarded to COM at that time was only an estimate due to the fact the City had not
begun negotiations regarding the final scope of services and corresponding fees. At that
time, $500,000 was awarded to CDM.
The City has negotiated the complete additional services required of CDM for this project,
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum
Water and Wastewater Pump Station Upgrade CDM Additional Services
July 7, 2004
Page 3 of 3
which will include the "Shop Drawing, Samples and Miscellaneous Issues" (Task 2.0) and
the "Resident Project Representative" (Task 3.0). All other services have been
contemplated in the initial services approved in Resolution 2004-25465. The fee for these
services has been negotiated for a not to exceed amount of $924,640. With the
Commission's prior approval of up to $500,000 additional funding in the amount of
$424,640 is needed, as outlined in Attachment A.
Funding for these additional services are available in the amount of $398,736.98 from
Series 1995 Water/Sewer Bond Interest, $25,478.40 from City Center RDA TIF and
$424.64 from South Pointe RDA TIF, with the understanding that when the City
Administration and City Attorney are able to negotiate an acceptable settlement with the
surety company United Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) for the previous
contractor Felix Equities and if the appropriate Courts approve the settlement; funding will
be reimbursed to the funding source.
CONCLUSION
At this time the condition of some of the Pump Stations are in emergency status; Widell,
Inc. has executed the contract with the City and mobilizations in the project have begun.
Awarding this additional services to CDM in an amount not to exceed $424,640 for
Construction Administration and Field Observation services will ensure the best
performance of the new contractor.
ATTACHMENT
T:\AGENOA\2004\JuI0704\Regular\Pump Stations COM ROA Memo.doc
i\ ttadUl(JVLt A
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CONSUL TANT SERVICE ORDER
Dated: January 5, 2004
(Revised April 20 2004)
TO: Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 710
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: Amendment 13A to the Agreement between the City of Miami Beach
and Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. dated July-21, 1992
Pursuant to the Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
(CDM) for Professional Services, dated July 21, 1992, (Agreement) the parties desire to amend
the Agreement to retain the services of CDM to provide Construction Administration Services
during construction of the Water and Wastewater Pump Station Upgrade (Re-Procurement). This
project consists of the citywide rehabilitation of the water and wastewater pump stations
throughout the City. The services provided are more particularly described in the attached Scope
of Work:
Project Name:
Water and Wastewater Pump Station Upl!:rade (Re-Procurement)
Calendar days to complete this work:
555 days from the First Notice to Proceed,
including 510 day construction period.
Fee for this Service Order:
Task 2.0 (Not-to-Exceed)
Task 3.0 (Not to Exceed)
Total Service Order (Not-to-Exceed)
$ 110,940
$313.700
$ 424,640
Basic Service
x
Additional Service
Reimbursable Expense
ACCEPTED:
City of Miami Beach
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
l/4tft,f/
Tim Hemstreet
CIP Director
Date
Victor J. Pujals, P.
Vice President
Date
N:\KM1414.CSO.doc
4/2012004
"~,
SCHEDULE A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
WATER AND WASTEWATER PUMP STATION UPGRADE (RE-PROCUREMENT)
PHASE III GENERAL SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
April 20, 2004 Revised
CONSULTANT shall provide General Engineering Services during the proposed contract
construction period of 510 days (17 months) to Final Acceptance (FA). General Engineering
Services during construction will be provided by the CONSULTANT for the pump station
upgrades improvements project for which drawings, specifications and other documents
were prepared by the CONSULTANT. These general engineering services shall include the
following:
Task 1.0 General Services
Addressed in Amendment 13.
Task 2.0 Shop Drawings and Samples, Factory Witness Testing. Miscellaneous Issues
2.1
Review and approval of shop drawings and samples, the results of tests
and inspections and other data which the Contractor is required to
submit. The costs of reviewing substitute products as submitted by the
Contractor, shall be separately billed to the CITY and payment made to
CONSULTANT. Reimbursement to the CITY, by the Contractor, shall
be as defined within the construction Contract Documents.
2.2
Perform factory visits, as required, for the purpose of witnessing
specified factory testing of pumps.
2.3
CO NSUL T ANT will address miscellaneous issues related to the default
contractors or prior work with prior knowledge and approval of the
CITY that are not currently anticipated under another Task of this
Amendment.
Task 3.0 Resident Project Re{'resentative
3.0
The CONSULTANT will furnish one full-time resident project
representative and other field staff as necessary to assist the
CONSULTANT in observing performance of the work of the
Contractor. The duration estimated for this project is over a 510
calendar day construction period to Final Acceptance (FA). Should this
period be exceeded, CONSULTANT reserves the right to request
A-I
N:\KM1414.Exh Adoc
4/20/2004
additional compensation. The resident project representative is the
CONSULTANT's representative and will act as directed by and under
the supervision of the CONSULTANT, and will confer with the
CONSULTANT regarding their actions. The Duties and
Responsibilities of the resident project representative are listed below
in Schedule C. The resident project representative's dealings in
matters pertaining to the on site work shaH in general be only with the
CONSULTANT and Contractor, and dealings with subcontractors shaH
only be through or with the full knowledge of the Contractor. Written
communication with the CITY will be only through or as directed by
the CONSULTANT. This phase of the work runs concurrently with the
construction contract's time period of construction.
Task 4.0 Close Out Activities
Addressed in Amendment 13.
SAFETY
CONSULTANT shaH have no authority over or responsibility for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures selected by the construction contractor or for safety
precautions and programs incident to the work of the construction contractor.
CONSUL T ANT and its personnel have no authority to exercise control over any construction
contractor or other entity or their work or any health and safety precautions and have no duty
for inspecting, noting, observing, correcting, or reporting on health or safety deficiencies of
the construction contractor or other entity or any other persons at the site except
CONSULTANT's personnel.
DATA OR ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY
A. Assign a CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR to represent the CITY on this assignment.
B. Assist in the scheduling of necessary shutdowns during the execution of the Work by
the CONTRACTOR.
C. Payment of aU permit fees associated with this project.
D. Pump and SCADA system start-up, data monitoring and control will be performed by
the CITY staff in accordance with the "OWNER" related responsibilities of
operational testing protocol indicated in Specification Sections 11212,11214,11307
and 13300.
E. Provide CONSULTANT with an electronic document disclaimer prior to the transfer
of electric documents (e.g., drawing and materials).
A-2
N:\KM1414.Exh A.doc
4/20/2004
"~
DELIVERABLES
A. Copies of pre-construction and monthly progress meeting minutes prepared by the
CONSULTANT.
B. One copy of all approved shop drawings, and other submittals.
C. Copies of all correspondence to the CONTRACTOR.
D. Copies of Change Orders.
E. Three Sets of record drawings (24-inch x 36-inch), two black-line, one vellum, and one
AutoCAD diskette at the end of construction.
TIME OF COMPLETION
The Time of completion is not within the control of the CONSULTANT. The
CONSULTANT's schedule and provision of the various services is dependent upon the
construction period defined within the Contract Construction Documents.
General Services will commence upon issuance of the First Notice to Proceed to the
Contractor. RPR Services will commence upon issuance of the Second Notice to Proceed to
the Contractor. General and RPR Services are based on an anticipated 45 days between first
and second notice to proceed and the 510 days construction contract duration, however,
contract close out activities are anticipated to be completed within 60 days of the project
substantial completion date. The substantial completion date is 450 days beginning with the
Second Notice to Proceed.
If the total construction contract runs longer than 510 days, additional fees for extended
engineering services will be negotiated for the extended construction duration.
PAYMENT AND COMPENSATION
The total fee and basis for the above services based upon the scope of work presented in this
Services Order and Exhibits A-2, and A-3 is as follows:
Component of Work
Task 2.0 Shop Drawings and Samples, etc. (not to exceed)
Amount
Task 3.0 Project Representation Services (not to exceed)
$ 110,940
$ 313,700
Total Amendment No.13A (Task 2.0-3.0) (not to exceed)
$ 424,640
The CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the CITY. Each invoice shall include a
monthly written status report.. Invoicing for the not-to-exceed services Task 2.0 and 3.0, shall
be billed monthly on a time and materials basis at the CONSULTANT's prevailing rates,
Schedule B.
A-3
N;\KM1414 Exh A.doc
4/20/2004
CDI'JI
SCHEDULE B
CDM
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
COST GROUP II
CATEGORIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
OFFICER
PRINCIPAL I ASSOCIATE
SENIOR PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL"
PROFESSIONAL I
PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES
SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES
STAFFSUPPORTSER~CES
FIELD SERVICES
SENIOR PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL
PROJECTSUPPORTSER~CES
PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
HOURLY
RATES
S 155.00
S 140.00
S 120.00
S 100.00
S 80.00
S 85.00
S 70.00
S 75.00
S 60.00
S 60.00
All subconsultant and other project related expenses are
subject to a minimum handling/administrative charge of 10'-..
RATES EFFECTIVE THROUGH JULY 3, 2004
'~.;
SCHEDULE C
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
\VATER AND WASTEWATER PUMP STATION VPGRADE (RE-PROCUREMENT)
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANTS RESIDENT PROJECT
REPRESENTATIVE (RPR)
Updated March 15,2004
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The resident project representative will:
1. Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions, and
schedule of values prepared by the Contractor and consult with CONSULTANT
concerning their acceptability.
2. Conferences: Arrange a schedule of progress meetings and other job conferences as
required in consultation with CONSULTANT and notify those expected to attend in
advance.
3. Liaison:
a. Serve as CONSULT ANT's liaison with Contractor, working principally through
Contractor's superintendent and assist him in understanding the intent of the
Contract Documents. Assist CONSULTANT in serving as the CITY's liaison with
Contractor when Contractor's operations affect the CITY's on-site operations.
b. As requested by CONSULTANT, assist in obtaining from the CITY additional
details or information, when required at the job site for proper execution of the
Work.
4. Shop Drawings and Samples:
a. Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples, receive samples
which are furnished at the site by Contractor, and notify CONSULTANT of their
availability for examination.
b. Advise CONSULTANT and Contractor or its superintendent immediately of the
commencement of any Work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if
the submission has not been approved by CONSULTANT.
5. Review of Work, Rejection of Defective \-Vork, Inspections and Tests:
a. Conduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to assist CONSULTANT in
determining if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents
and that completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents.
b. Report to CONSULTANT whenever he believes that any Work is unsatisfactory,
faulty, or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not
meet the requirements of any inspections, tests, or approval required to be made
or has been damaged prior to final payment; and advise CONSULTANT when he
C-I
N:\K/ot1371.SCH c.~c
3/1212004
believes Work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for
observation, or requires special testing, inspection, or approval.
c. Verify that tests, equipment, and system's start-ups, and operating and
maintenance instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents
and in presence of the required personnel, and that Contractor maintains adeq uate
records thereof; observe, record, and report to CONSULTANT appropriate details
relative to the test procedures and start-ups.
d. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having
jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to
CONSUL T ANT.
. - 6. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to Contractor CONSULTANT's
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents.
7. Modifications: Consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications in
Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to CONSULTANT.
8. Records:
a. Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job
conferences, Shop Drawings and sample submissions, reproductions of original
Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, additional
Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, CONSULTANT's
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and
other Project-related documents.
b. Keep diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data
relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and
representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily
activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific observations in more
detail as the case of observing test procedures. Send copies to CONSULTANT.
c. Record names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all Contractors,
subcontractors, and major suppliers of materials and equipment.
9. Reports:
a. Furnish CONSULTANT periodic reports, as required, of progress of the Work and
Contractor's compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of
Shop Dra~ings submissions.
b. Consult with CONSULTANT in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections, or
start of important phases of the work.
c. Report immediately to CONSULTANT upon the occurrence of any accident.
10. Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with Contractor for
compliance with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with
recommendations to CONSULTANT, noting particularly their relation to the schedule
of values, Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not
incorporated in the Work.
C-2
N:\KM1371.SCH C.doc
311212004
',~ .
11. Completion:
a. Before CONSULTANT issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to
Contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction.
b. Conduct final inspection in the company of CONSULTANT, the CITY, and
Contractor and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected.
c. Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make
recommendations to CONSULTANT concerning acceptance.
LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY
Except upon written instructions of CONSULTANT, Resident Project Representative:
1. Sh.all not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents orap-prove any substitute
materials or equipment. /
2. Shall not exceed limitations on CONSULTANT's authority as set forth in the Contract
Documents.
3. Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of Contractor, subcontractors or
Contractor's superintendent, or expedite the Work.
4. Shall not advise on or issue directions relative to any aspect of the means, methods,
techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction unless such is specifically called for
in the Contract Documents.
S. Shall not advise on or issue directions as to safety precautions and programs in
connection with the Work.
6. Shall not authorize the CITY to occupy the Project in whole or in part.
7. Shall not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests.
C-3
N:\KMt37t.SCHC.iIoC
Jll1J2C04
EXHIBIT A-2
PROJECT BUDGET
SHOP DRAWINGS AND
SAMPLES - TASK 2.0
PROJECT:
City of Miami Beach, Florida
Water and Wastewater Pump Station Upgrades (Re-Procurement)
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
Shop Drawings and Samples - Task 2.0
CONTRACT
REFERENCE:
Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.,
dated July 21, 1992
LABOR Hours Billing Rate Cost by Labor Category
Officer 8 $ 155 $ 1,240
Principal/Associate 76 $ 140 $ 10,640
Construction Coordinator (Principal) 56 $ 140 $ 7,840
Senior Professional 250 $ 120 $ 30,000
Professional " 240 $ 100 $ 24,000
Professional I 120 $ 80 $ 9,600
Project Administration 222 $ 60 $ 13,320
Total Labor Hours 972
Total LABOR COST $ 96,640
Labor Escalation estimated @ 3% $2.900
$ 99,540
OUTSIDE PROFESSIONALS
Zyscovich
Task 2.1 9 (120hrs @$95/hr) $ 11,400
Total OUTSIDE PROFESSIONALS $ 11,400
Total NOT TO EXCEED FEE $ 110,940
c:a.t
I(M1414....T.... Z
4/2112004
EXHIBIT A-3
PROJECT BUDGET
RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. TASK 3.0
PROJECT:
City of Miami Beach. Florida
Water and Wastewater Pump Stalion Upgrades (Re-Procurement)
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
Resident Services During Construction - Task 3.0
CONTRACT
REFERENCE:
Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc..
dated July 21, 1992
LABOR Hours Billing Rate Cost by Labor Category
Special inspector for EUM (Principal) 24 -$ 140 $ 3.360
Sr. Professional (RPR) 2947 $ 75 $ 221,000
Sr. Professional (RPR) Electrical 680 $ 75 $ 51.000
Professional I (RPR) 360 $ 80 $ 28.800
Project Administration 8 $ 60 $ 480
Total Labor Hours 3987
Total LABOR COST $ 304,640
Labor Escalation estimated @ 3% $ 9100
$ 313,700
Total NOT TO EXCEED FEE $ 313,700
CIJM
KM1.1.JdlT.... 3
~112OlM