Loading...
478-2004 RDA Reso RESOLUTION NO. 478-2004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RATIFYING AMENDMENT NO. 16, IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21,1992, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY; SAID AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION PROJECT; AND APPROPRIATING $223,941, AVAILABLE FROM THE SOUTH POINTE REDEVELOPMENT AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2002, the City's engineering consultant, Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (COM), submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design options for the proposed South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station (the Project); and WHEREAS, due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks, and other items, were to be located off-site at the nearby City-owned lot located at the intersection of Commerce Street and Jefferson Avenue; and WHEREAS, at that time, residents and City Departments concurred that Option 2, a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility, was the most feasible, as opposed to Option 1, which included all of the facility components on-site, configured within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and WHEREAS, COM was authorized to proceed with the design development of Option 2; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2003, COM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the rectangular site at the intersection of Alton Road and Jefferson Avenue remotely as planned; and WHEREAS, COM decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure, resulting in significant modifications to Option 2, as originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents; and WHEREAS, an updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6.9 million dollars, estimated in the Preliminary Design Report, to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars; and WHEREAS, COM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the Project closer to the City's original construction budget; and WHEREAS, in order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2; and WHEREAS, accordingly, the Administration has negotiated fees for an Amendment No. 16, to the City's Agreement with COM, dated July 21, 1992, for professional engineering services for the upgrade of sewer and water pumping stations and a new pumping station on the MacArthur Causeway, and recommends the appropriation of funding, in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, that the Chairman and Members of the Miami beach Redevelopment Agency approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to the Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (COM), dated July 21, 1992, for Professional Engineering Services for the Upgrade of Sewer & Water Pumping Stations and a new Pumping Station on MacArthur Causeway; said Agreement to provide additional architectural, engineering and landscape architectural services to re-design the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project; and appropriating $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Sept. , 2004. ~~p~ CITY CLERK APPROVED"1O &LANGUAOI & FOR EXIiQII'IGIt. ATTEST: ~y fA CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM SUMMARY m Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Chairman and Members of the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency ratifying Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941 , to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, to provide Additional Architectural Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station (the Project); and appropriating $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. Issue: Shall the Redevelopment Agency ratify Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., and appropriate funding in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe RDA Tax Increment Funds? Item Summary/Recommendation: On May 10,2002, the City's Consultant CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station. Due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks and other items, were to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15, Block 51. At that time, residents, and City Departments concurred that Option 2 (Attachment 2) was the most feasible, and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development. On January 9,2003, CDM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the site remotely as planned. Consequently, the design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure. With this change, it became evident that there were significant modifications to the Option 2, originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents. An updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6.9 million dollars estimated in the Preliminary Design Report to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars. CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the project closer to the City's original construction budget. In order to significantly reduce the Project cost, will be necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved in Option 2. The Administration has negotiated the fees for Amendment No. 16, and recommends the appropriation of funding in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. Advisory Board Recommendation: I N/A Financial Information: Finance Dept. South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds Source of Funds: Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin Carla Dixon, Ext 6264. AGENDA ITEM 3C- DATE '1-.f-oy' CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 hllp:\\miamibeachfl.gov To: FROM: SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM Chairman and Members of the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency Jorge M. Gonzalez J. ~ City Manager fJ'- 0 A RESOLUTION . F THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RATYFYING AMENDMENT NO.16 TO AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION PROJECT; AND APPROPRIATING $223,941, AVAILABLE FROM THE FROM SOUTH POINTE REDEVELOPMENT AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS. Date: September8,2004 ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. FUNDING: Funding for this Project, in the amount of $223,941, is available from the South Pointe RDA Fund. ANALYSIS: On July 8, 1992, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 92-20540, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the firm of Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM), to provide architectural, engineering services for the upgrade of the sewer and water pumping stations, and to design a new Water Booster Pump Station on the Mac Arthur Causeway. In the year 2000 Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City's Planning and Zoning Department, it was determined that the existing pump station equipment had exceeded its capacity, surpassed its useful life, was inefficient and presented additional operation and maintenance costs without the construction of a new in-line booster station at South Pointe. The alternative to providing a new South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station would be major structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades at five (5) existing pump stations downstream of Pump Station (PS) 28B (PS Nos. 1,10,11 ,28D, and 31). Consequently, the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project was identified as a priority, and the Public Works Department recommended its construction. Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 2 On January 31, 2001, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24243, approving Amendment NO.9 to its 1992 Agreement with Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc., (CDM) to provide Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Booster Pump Station in South Pointe. Project Limits: The proposed pump station is to be located on Alton Road and 1 sl Street. This triangular property is bounded by the rights-of-way of Jefferson Avenue to the east, Alton Road to the West, First Street to the north, and the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Alton Road at Commerce Street to the south. Project Scope: Construction of 2-1500 HP Pumps with a 54-inch diameter force main, by-pass, FPL vault, transformers, control room, emergency generator, fuel storage tanks, HV AC and ventilation system, SCADA controls, architectural treatments, and landscaping. On May 10, 2002, the City's Consultant, CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station, Option 1 (Attachment 1) which includes the configuration of all the components on-site arranged within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and Option 2 (Attachment 2) a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility with the pumps housed on the 1 st floor, electrical room and generator on the 2nd floor. Due to site constraints that included the existing 54-inch diameter force main which runs diagonally to the property, and the triangular shaped site, CDM sought to provide vehicular maintenance access, minimize utility relocation, simplify pipe runs, and curtail the size of the structures while maintaining the facility aesthetics. CDM intended to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties. The FPL vault, standby generator, fuel storage tanks and other components vital for the pump station were originally to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15 Block 51 located at the intersection of Jefferson and 1 sl Street. At that time, the Residents, Planning and Public Works Departments concurred that Option 2 was the most feasible and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development. On January 9, 2003, CDM reported to the City that concurrent to the preparation of the thirty Percent (30%) construction drawings, the CDM design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure, as they were advised by the City of the unavailability of a remote site to place this and other components. On January 14, 2003, the City immediately held a meeting with CDM and their consulting architects-Zyscovich Architects, to discuss the changes. During this meeting the City's consultant presented a revised site plan incorporating the FPL vault into the structure. It became evident to the City that there was significant modification to Option 2, and an increase in the building footprint. The revised structure was taller, larger, and more massive than originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement conditions. The City directed its consultant to prepare conceptual elevations of the new structure(s) reflecting the new building height, and massing. In addition, to schedule a meeting with the Planning Department staff to review and evaluate those proposed changes prior to any Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 3 decision to proceed beyond the thirty percent (30%) design development level, and further presenting the Project to the Design Review Board. CDM was requested by the City to provide an updated engineer's estimate of probable construction cost. On April 28, 2003, City staff met to discuss the increase from the $6.9 million dollars in the Preliminary Design Report of May, 2002, to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars in the engineer's estimate of probable cost dated April 9, 2003. Due to the significant increase in the cost of the construction, CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone further design development until the submittal and acceptance of an option that would bring the project closer to the City's original construction budget. CDM attributed the increase in the project cost to changes prompted primarily by the unavailability of lot 15, Block 51. The pump station components were reconfigured on the triangular site, the FPL sub-station type transformer placed within the building structure versus pad mounted outdoor, relocation of the bypass force main, yard piping and generator, changes in the HV AC design, on site location of the fuel tank, and demolition and disposal of abandoned pile caps from the previous elevated water tank not reflected in the topographic survey. City staff and CDM explored several options to bring the project closer to its original budget, including: . The use of 2-1500 HP Pump Versus 3-900 HP Pump option. CDM advised that the City would realize an immediate cost savings in excess of $200,000, by implementing this change. The Public Works Department, after evaluation of operations, maintenance and repair options agreed to the use of the 2-1500 HP Pumps. · Re-evaluation of the ownership, availability and use of Lot 15, Block 51, in an attempt to offer more flexibility to the design team for the placement of the building components. However, Planning Department staff did not approve of the use of a prefabricated fuel tank and generator modular unit with landscape screening at this prominent site. Staff later agreed to fit the modular unit within the triangular site, with landscape screening. Although the modular unit will add to the already restricted site, significant cost savings will of up to $900,000, will be realized as this reduces the structural requirements of the Option 2 building. On September 12, 2003, CDM requested additional compensation from the City in the amount of $69,000, for providing supplemental out-of-scope services incurred as a result of the change in the program. Re-design of the structure to add the transformer vault (at the 30% design submittal), reorganization of the site, structural components and piping layout, and coordination during an extended contract term due to delays in the project originally scheduled to be completed in the Fall of 2002. Of this amount, the City has only approved $57,000 included in the Subtask C - Additional Services below. In order to reduce the project cost by a significant amount, it will be necessary to re -design the layout of the primary components originally approved in Option 2. The majority of the thirty percent (30%) design documents already produced by CDM will be discarded, in order Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 4 to accommodate the components on site within a less massive structure, while maintaining the construction budget. During the Amendment No. 16 negotiation process CDM, on the behalf of Zyscovich Architects, requested additional Architectural Services fees in the amount of $96,500. Of this amount, $35,000 was solely associated with the DRB presentation and approval process. Upon a review of the original Agreement, it was determined that CDM was obligated to present the Project to the DRB until final acceptance, and therefore, the City could not justify this portion of the fees. The parties could not arrive at an agreement with the existing design team for both budgetary as well as time constraints. CDM proposed, and the City agreed to the reorganization of the existing design team resulting in a more acceptable fee for architectural treatments and the DRB presentation. CDM has selected ST A Architectural Group for architectural design services on this Project. The original Additional Services fee requested by CDM for the re-design work to the thirty percent (30%) level, including Additional fees for the extended Contract term was $271, 176, the final amount resulting from the negotiations is $223,941 as follows: A. Architectural and EnQineerinQ Services Task A.1 Subtotal CDM Labor... .......... ......... ............ ........................... ................... $ 93,525 Outside Professional Services: Architectural... . . . . . . ... .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. .., . .. . . . .. . ... . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . ...... . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . ... . . . . $30,000 Landscaping... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ..$ 2.500 Total TaskA (Lump sum) ................................................ ....$126,025 B. Not Used C. Additional Services - PermittinQ/BiddinQ Services C.1 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ............... ... .....$19,920 Outside Professional Services: Architectural (DRB) ...... ...... ...... .......... ... ... ... ............... ... ...... ............ ... ..... ..$10,000 Landscape (DRB) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ............ .............. ......... ... ...... ....... $ 1,200 C.2 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...$ 1,785 C.3 CDM Services (Lump Sum) ... ... ...... ...... ... ...... ... ............... .................... $57.000 Total Task C (Upper Limit) .................................................. $89,905 D. Reimbursables D.1 Design Services (Lump Sum) ............................................................... $ 8.011 Total Task D (Lump Sum) ....................................................$8.011 Total Amendment No 16 (Not-to-Exceed).......................... ...$223,941 The Agreement specifies that the completion of the design and advertisement for Bid shall be within ten (10) months of the approval of Amendment No. 16 by the City Commission. The project Advertisement for Bids, construction contract negotiations, and construction are targeted to be completed concurrently with the on-line placement of the Pump Stations Upgrades Project or shortly thereafter. CDM's responsibilities under Amendment No. 16, (Attachment 3) for the Redesign of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station will include, but are not limited to, Design and Production of one hundred percent (1 OO%)Contract Documents, providing all Permitting Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 5 related services, ORB application, presentation and acceptance, Bidding Services. The City has negotiated with COM, fees for Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape Architectural Services for the re-design of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project. The Administration recommends the ratification of Amendment NO.16 by the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, and appropriation of funding in that same amount available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. Attachments T:\AGENDA \2004ISep0804IConsentICDM AMENDMENT N0l6 RDA MEMO.doc N -: ,... ~"~ ft' " .. ~ ii:tjo~ or ...-0 @ fi1 ~.~ ~ g w gO .... "' < , ~ ~ cr 15 '" ,::T ~ Rl co :;- ~ c.- 8 or .,- p ~ 0- ;;: ... .. 0 ~ '" ..., '" --< .... 0 " 0 A 3 '" ffi '::i ~ s: ~ en ~. g g g'~:T ~ Po ~ .:r ~ :r ." "' - Q -- '1J a: en c IU ~ 3 !Po." !e ~ o' " -, "".I 1 ---~'-."~~,f -J."I- --, ~ 'I, ' -I I' 'j' " \, ~= I . i j. I ' ",c."ce,L,11 ,'; ; . I',' . 'I i~'~ , ~ "\ ~d 1 ,- \.~..;:rt-~-:_~~. \>',,1 " \--<. ':' " " <"ill \~li \ '-.1/(: ,"'\ ~ , {.;..;.'- \, (~Ci ~--- . \, . ~ \' "~' '-I \,:~-: l{:-:' \ \ \ --. \ \ I ,\ ','\-1 f~..~') ~_l U' . :1 l I i , . , i ~ c.. ! I!:R ~ m .. if! z . ,< m ! ,m I 1 ":J !I ,_ ,- :1 i~l';';:,i1! ' i,ll"", ," . ~i.:' I \' ,fe',' .:.'~ ~_~:.:~:.~/ ,-: 11 "o,f" \'", ,. I l' ~-- ',,"7'\ \ \ '-~ \ \ \, 1 \ \\11 ',:-> \..~.,~ ,~ '\ (~, "..J' ~... ~\ '!,' ~\ \ \ , \. y; ~, ' I, ' 't\..< [)~7~ ~L( ! ;~ ) \ , -~ ;l:' rt rt ~ () ::J S (1) )> ::I 0 c: rt 'tI '" ..... - c: O' !Il ;, "" .... ,0 /OJ 0 ~ o "C - o' :J '" Jl HloN ~~e~~ m~' . 0 6' w 9: 0 ~;j !!: < ~ k; ~ g: 11 ~ ~:;- ~ ~ P- p .. 0 .. '" '" '" ..... i:n ""'" " 0 " 0 A 3 Rl iii ~ ;1 - ~~V;,\'~~?";""lii>~d ."'">- "\ ~'... -=..:. -l~~:::' ..... .... ,...'.. \ ,\.'~;~'~.; " ~I'.i -;:'::~(l;r'T''''''..'' , '\ . '~" ..[.,~.A". ~ i I " '~ ". ~ I \, \\ \\\':" '" ,'.1 ..1 \ '\ '.' ;' ..' i '. '. "~" j - '. '-, \ ~. 1\' :' ' .J ! " .' ~ ; '. ' ~ I \\ \~\ r. ,H \ \.. \",UJ\~', .~._' "j \ \ \\:::'\-~r'- ...:: n I ' " I \. \", I,'! 0 Ii :\ '; :. j II .' \, \,'~--- _:.!I \\ ~-' ."') i \\ ,_~ /........1: \,\~.N~: I ,,\~il '\\.AI1' \:;,\1 I \, \..1 ~ ~ en Ql 6" 0 2. ::J C :f~:r ~ ~ ~ . ,,-. 'Tl =;' ~ 0" !e. - ~ rt! ~ - - 3 l!" en ~ o' :J r-; "j ~ ~ ~ m . i ~ m z ~ -'0 ,.... ':J" ......rt ,rt PJ ,t) " ::r '3 CD ::l rt N, ~ v , 11. ~ '" . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l!S II '" , w 0 II 0 ,- ,- ~ III c '" '" '" '" '" f-! q ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" f!l c -< q c 3 ~ 0 0 0 q 3 . ~ ~ 'l. 'l. ~ ~ '" " ;. . ~ ~ ~ ~ , "l ~ ; '" " .. '" '" ~ ;; 'l. 'l. 'l. ::l '" '" , , 0- 0- if ~ '" '" '" '" ~ r;; z ~ '" 0 ~ ~ '" C C ~ ;; ~ c '" '" -< "" ~ 3 ~ c 3 0 0 0 0 2 ~ "' ~ ~ ~ 3 . ~ 'l. !:. ~ . ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ :;- '" if '" 'l. 'l. !:. ~ 8- 0- '" '" 0- ~ ~ 0- ~ ~ ;. n. '" z ~ '" 0 < !O 0 ~ '" c c ~ ;; "- 0 "" ~ ~ ~ '" 3 0 g ~ ~ ~ . ~ ;; ~ 0 ~ '" 0 if 3 ~ 0- ~ ~ . < '" ;. "- 0 0 3 __r--- ~ ro (j) IT] ro < o o ~ ~ J> 1 l!lllllllll I III I 1 N o o .., o c ~ o 3. -~ " o Q. z ",0 ,::u ",--< <I ~~ o Zo:< (f1 "-1 (f1 --< ,. c "3 9.S ~ c [3 ~ ~o -c c < g ~ o ~ ,. n " " o ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 0 z: ~ n , ~ c 3 ~ .- ~ - 3 ;; 0 -~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;;- ~ m", '" !2 C c 1i ::J 0 < 0 0 ~n ~ ~ , n n ~ ~ 0 0 0 IT] . ro < 0 0 ~ r !lli::11 "cn i,il - <:> ~ ~ 8." l,t..,I. . ~ l: 0 n 0 Ilj!lljl ; ~ 3 l: III i' I - "O- j "":1 = ~ cn:T , ~ ~ , '111 '1 " !!!!Po;: ~~ -1l , 3 .. 0 PI " ~ - il,I;I.1 . . ~ S. ~ . . '" . ; g - i " ' . 1:!i!1 . g ~ @v ;(~ llS q~ ::! Ii ~ "l ~ o "l ~ o " 2. ~~ llS~ q; ::;j o z '=! ;. ~ q " c 3 " '" D N W .. "l N '" ~ '" o 2. ~ ~ "l " c 3 " '" D '" ~ , ~ o ~ '" o 2. 2. 2. " c 3 " '" D " ~ o " ~ ~ '" o , ~ o ~ '" o o 3 , o ~ ~ co " " ~ .. m ;0- ~ 2. '" o o 3 '" o 2. , o < !!. , o < !!. q ~ ~ 9 " c 3 " '" D co " ~ .. [!! '1l;. ;; 2. '" o o 3 , ~ ~~ o " "l '" o '" ~ ~ o , , 0 .E!:i: ~ . N ~ " "l "l " c 3 " '" D 2. " c 3 " '" D , o ~ ,- ~ !!. , o < !!. l/) 0 C ~ ::r 3: rn 0 0 rn e: " 'n " n 0 ~ 0 (f) (1) C n 3 0 ~ ~ .- ;; ~ < " 0 ~ ~ 0 0 n ~ '" , '" rn 0 c 0 c '" ~ 0 f;' , c ~ ~ C 3 < C ~ (1) 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ g < C :J 0 " Z 0 0 0 ,. ,. e: c 0 :J 3 3 .,. n 3 3 0 C c c 5 ~ 3 3 :[ n ~ , 0 0 '" c c c < ~ c 3 ~ g ~ 0 i! ~ I:t> 1!I111l111 ; l/J r'I'i'''1 "ll(fl ",I _.!...") ",0 '1.111 ! f g-< ~ ~.I J.III- c 0 ,C !!lll!i' I ~ 3 c I_ I 00 ",-f I - <I n 'C_ O )> Jl!U!'! (fl::T "Ii i != I~I :::<1<' . 0 iN -"ll , 3 0 ~ . a 2. I ~"i:ll, [ 0 III iii &' -. '0 z'" 11".1 _. :) ~ . .. l/J)> . i g - , 0 (f) li:i!1 . g -f I ~ . f. "l ~ o " "l ~ o " '" o 2. 2. 2. '" o , ~ o ~ " o C " ~ '" o o 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-25680 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 16, IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (COM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY; SAID AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION PROJECT. WHEREAS, on May 10, 2002, the City's engineering consultant, Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (COM), submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design options for the proposed South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station (the Project); and WHEREAS, due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks, and other items, were to be located off-site at the nearby City-owned lot located at the intersection of Commerce Street and Jefferson Avenue; and WHEREAS, at that time, residents and City Departments concurred that Option 2, a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility, was the most feasible, as opposed to Option 1, which included all of the facility components on-site, configured within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and WHEREAS, COM was authorized to proceed with the design development of Option 2; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2003, COM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the rectangular site at the intersection of Alton Road and Jefferson Avenue remotely as planned; and WHEREAS, COM decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure, resulting in significant modifications to Option 2, as originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents; and WHEREAS, an updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6.9 million dollars, estimated in the Preliminary Design Report, to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars; and WHEREAS, CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the Project closer to the City's original construction budget; and WHEREAS, in order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2; and WHEREAS, accordingly, the Administration has negotiated fees for an Amendment No. 16, to the City's Agreement with CDM, dated July 21, 1992, for professional engineering services for the upgrade of sewer and water pumping stations and a new pumping station on the MacArthur Causeway, and recommends the appropriation of funding, in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to the Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, for Professional Engineering Services for the Upgrade of Sewer & Water Pumping Stations and a new Pumping Station on MacArthur Causeway; said Agreement to provide additional architectural, engineering and landscape architectural services to re-design the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Sept. ,2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION ATTEST: 1~~ P cutL CITY CLERK F:\CAPI\$all\DlXC\lO SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATlON\CDM AMEND NO 16 RDA RESQ,doc CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY lQ Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941, to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station (the Project). Issue: Shall the Commission approve Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project? Item Summary/Recommendation: On May 10. 2002. the City's Consultant CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station. Due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties. components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks and other items, were to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15, Block 51. At that time, residents, and City Departments concurred that Option 2 (attachment 2) was the most feasible. and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development. On January 9,2003, CDM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the site remotely as planned. Consequently, the design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure. With this change, it became evident that there were significant modifications to the Option 2, originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents. An updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6.9 million dollars estimated in the Preliminary Design Report to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars. CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the project closer to the City's original construction budget. In order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2. The Administration has negotiated the fees for, and recommends the execution of Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape Architectural Services to Re-design the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project. Advisory Board Recommendation: I N/A Financial Information: Source of " Amount Account Approved Funds: 1 ' $223,941.00 South Pointe Redevelopment Area Fund Finance Dept. Total Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin Carla Dixon, Ext 6264. Manager nager of AGENDAITEM RlC DATE 9- g -oC( CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 hllp:\\miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: DATE: September 8, 2004 FROM: ." L SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY MMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 16 IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION PROJECT. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. FUNDING: Funding for this Project, in the amount of $223,941, is available from the South Pointe RDA Fund. ANALYSIS: On July 8, 1992, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 92-20540, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the firm of Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM), to provide architectural, engineering services for the upgrade of the sewer and water pumping stations, and to design a new Water Booster Pump Station on the Mac Arthur Causeway. In the year 2000 Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City's Planning and Zoning Department, it was determined that the existing pump station equipment had exceeded its capacity, surpassed its useful life, was inefficient and presented additional operation and maintenance costs without the construction of a new in-line booster station at South Pointe. The alternative to providing a new South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station would be major structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades at five (5) existing pump stations downstream of Pump Station (PS) 28B (PS Nos. 1,10,11 ,28D, and 31). Consequently, the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project was identified as a priority, and the Public Works Department recommended its construction. Commission Memorandum. CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 2 On January 31,2001, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24243, approving Amendment NO.9 to its 1992 Agreement with Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc., (COM) to provide Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Booster Pump Station in South Pointe. Project Limits: The proposed pump station is to be located on Alton Road and 151 Street. This triangular property is bounded by the rights-of-way of Jefferson Avenue to the east, Alton Road to the West, First Street to the north, and the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Alton Road at Commerce Street to the south. Project Scope: Construction of 2-1500 HP Pumps with a 54-inch diameter force main, by-pass, FPL vault, transformers, control room, emergency generator, fuel storage tanks, HV AC and ventilation system, SCADA controls, architectural treatments, and landscaping. On May 10, 2002, the City's Consultant, COM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station, Option 1 (Attachment 1) which includes the configuration of all the components on-site arranged within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and Option 2 (Attachment 2) a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility with the pumps housed on the 1 st floor, electrical room and generator on the 2nd floor. Due to site constraints that included the existing 54-inch diameter force main which runs diagonally to the property, and the triangular shaped site, COM sought to provide vehicular maintenance access, minimize utility relocation, simplify pipe runs, and curtail the size ofthe structures while maintaining the facility aesthetics. COM intended to lessen the impact on the adjacent residential properties. The FPL vault, standby generator, fuel storage tanks and other components vital for the pump station were originally to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15 Block 51 located at the intersection of Jefferson and 151 Street. At that time, the Residents, Planning and Public Works Departments concurred that Option 2 was the most feasible and COM was authorized to proceed with its design development. On January 9, 2003, COM reported to the City that concurrent to the preparation of the thirty Percent (30%) construction drawings, the COM design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure, as they were advised by the City of the unavailability of a remote site to place this and other components. On January 14, 2003, the City immediately held a meeting with COM and their consulting architects-Zyscovich Architects, to discuss the changes. During this meeting the City's consultant presented a revised site plan incorporating the FPL vault into the structure. It became evident to the City that there was significant modification to Option 2, and an increase in the building footprint. The revised structure was taller, larger, and more massive than originally presented to the Planning Department staff and residents, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement conditions. The City directed its consultant to prepare conceptual elevations of the new structure(s) reflecting the new building height, and massing. In addition, to schedule a meeting with the Planning Department staff to review and evaluate those proposed changes prior to any Commission Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 3 decision to proceed beyond the thirty percent (30%) design development level, and further presenting the Project to the Design Review Board (DRB). The City directed CDM to provide an updated engineer's estimate of probable construction cost. On April 28, 2003, City staff met to discuss the increase from the $6.9 million dollars in the Preliminary Design Report of May, 2002, to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars in the engineer's estimate of probable cost dated April 9, 2003. Due to the significant increase in the cost of the construction, CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone further design development until the submittal and acceptance of an option that would bring the project closer to the City's original construction budget. CDM attributed the increase in the project cost to changes prompted primarily by the unavailability of lot 15, Block 51. The pump station components were reconfigured on the triangular site, the FPL sub-station type transformer was placed within the building structure versus pad mounted outdoor, relocation of the bypass force main, yard piping and generator, changes in the HV AC design, on site location of the fuel tank, and demolition and disposal of abandoned pile caps from the previous elevated water tank not reflected in the topographic survey. City staff and CDM explored several options to bring the project closer to its original budget, including: · The use of 2-1500 HP Pump vs. 3-900 HP Pump option. CDM advised that the City would realize an immediate cost savings in excess of $200,000, by implementing this change. The Public Works Department, after evaluation of operations, maintenance and repair options agreed to the use of the 2-1500 HP Pumps. · Re-evaluation of the ownership, availability and use of Lot 15, Block 51, in an attempt to offer more flexibility to the design team for the placement of the building components. However, Planning Department staff did not approve of the use of a prefabricated fuel tank and generator modular unit with landscape screening at this prominent site. Staff later agreed to fit the modular unit within the triangular site, with landscape screening. Although the modular unit will add to the already restricted site, significant cost savings will of up to $900,000, will be realized as this reduces the structural requirements of the Option 2 building. On September 12, 2003, CDM requested additional compensation from the City in the amount of $69,000, for providing supplemental out-of-scope services incurred as a result of the change in the program. Re-design of the structure to add the transformer vault (at the 30% design submittal), reorganization of the site, structural components and piping layout, and coordination during an extended contract term due to delays in the project originally scheduled to be completed in the Fall of 2002. Of this amount, the City has only approved $57,000 included in the Subtask C - Additional Services below. In order to reduce the project cost by a significant amount, it will be necessary to re -design the layout of the primary components originally approved in Option 2. The majority of the thirty percent (30%) design documents already produced by CDM will be discarded, in order to accommodate the components on site within a less massive structure, while maintaining the construction budget. During the Amendment No. 16 negotiation process CDM, on the Commission Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 4 behalf of Zyscovich Architects, requested additional Architectural Services fees in the amount of $96,500. Of this amount, $35,000 was solely associated with the ORB presentation and approval process. Upon a review of the original Agreement, it was determined that COM was obligated to present the Project to the ORB until final acceptance, and therefore, the City could not justify this portion of the fees. The parties could not arrive at an agreement with the existing design team for both budgetary as well as time constraints. COM proposed, and the City agreed to the reorganization of the existing design team resulting in a more acceptable fee for architectural treatments and the ORB presentation. COM has selected STAArchitectural Group for architectural design services on this Project. The original Additional Services fee requested by COM for the re-design work to the thirty percent (30%) level, including Additional fees for the extended Contract term was $271, 176, the final amount resulting from the negotiations is $223,941as follows: A. Architectural and EnQineerinq Services Task A.1 Subtotal COM Labor............. ... ...... ... ...... ... .............................................. $ 93,525 Outside Professional Services: Architectural... ... .. . .. . ... .. . .. . ... ... .. . .. . .. . ... .. . .. . ... .. . .. .... .. . . .. ........ ... ....... ... ... .. .. $30,000 Landscaping ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ..... ...$ 2,500 Total Task A (Lump sum) ............................................. .......$126,025 B. Not Used C. Additional Services - Permittinq/Biddinq Services C.1 COM Services (Upper Limit) .............................................................. ...$19,920 Outside Professional Services: Architectural (ORB) .................... ..................................................... ........ ..$10,000 Landscape (ORB) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ........ ... ......... ...... ... ....... $ 1,200 C.2 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...$ 1,785 C.3 COM Services (Lump Sum) ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ...... ... ...... ............... ...... ... .. $57.000 Total Task C (Upper Limit) ... ... ... .... ......... ... ......... ...... ...... .... $89,905 D. Reimbursables 0.1 Design Services (Lump Sum) ............................................................... $ 8,011 Total Task 0 (Lump Sum) ....................................................$8.011 Total Amendment No 16 (Not-to-Exceed).. ............... ...... ......$223,941 The Agreement specifies that the completion of the design and advertisement for Bid shall be within ten (10) months of the approval of Amendment No. 16 by the City Commission. The project Advertisement for Bids, construction contract negotiations, and construction are targeted to be completed concurrently with the on-line placement of the Pump Stations Upgrades Project or shortly thereafter. CDM's responsibilities under Amendment No. 16, (Attachment 3) for the Redesign of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station will include, but are not limited to, Design and Production of one hundred percent (1 OO%)Contract Documents, providing all Permitting related services, ORB application, presentation and acceptance, Bidding Services. Commission Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16 September 8, 2004 Page 5 Conclusions: The City has negotiated with COM, fees for Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941 to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser McKee Inc., dated July 21, 1992, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape Architectural Services for the Re-Design of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project., and based upon the above stated, the Administration recommends the execution of same. Attachments T:\AGENDA\2004ISep0804IConsentICDM AMENDMENT NO 16 MEMO.doc N ~ !" : ....... ft' ," :r .3 lit:c5N ~. g~-~~ 5 wan ~ ;j iii 0 ~ u. IJ:S' o ... '< n S ~::r 8~ or g::;- )C ~ (") 5 ~ .' - '" '" ~ ::1 8 t;. ~ IV '" - ;;I. ~ :!:: en ClJ 6' 0 2. :'I C lD ,,- .. a.::T ~..'U ~ ;r~' Q ~ - a: (J) "U " _ c: IE 3 -" III iT - i)" " ,,'~":: \f. ,,""',r - -:-:-. \ \ 1f'1 \..t :. " ,'. it! . \~T.'c 'fll' {'\ <\,,~ /.;" \:"J \,'k .... . .~.:~ 1:1. \ ,C!!, ,', \\ \ ,.....\ . , I ". " I.....! ,,:CO\' ~- .....-:: \' ";1 l-~ o ... %\ l>\ \ -, ..1 --';r'1"'*r -1'~'~\ 1= .' -I' , i ~ I: . I ,IIL""I; 1/: g~ .~ .~ I: ;. :c.. ! I . J! :1 ! l I I i ,.: i I' : ;~ ... III Ii ~ . Oft I I .' IJ! _ r] ; _, J I ,":. ' ... ~11' , ,I 'ji \,' \,," I .; -; ,\ ,~-- , . .,it'. '\"\ II; .....1' .~-> II "j'\ \ \ . ... ... '. 1 1\ ;' .\. . ..~ '. , :.,:.'" oj ~~.'_ J. '. . ,. - .~" '- \, \ \ I. ) \".4.J !' ...' .~'. l)_~~_ r' /sL-( 51 r1 7f) \. \ _---1 :J:' ("1' ("1' III () :::r S CD ~ ("1' ~ I I o ~ "C fa _ C o' !l ::I ... ... p ~ C> ~ .s "r '" ~ 8 '< ~fjkf::Jcn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" . 0 ... '" ~ '" ... ... .. '" 'Y ;:~Ul ii' - 0 3 g c Cii ::II :; (II ~" l!I .. 0 ?' 'TI-' 'TI ~- ::II - .. - ~ - 'Il is.: CJ) C " ":I !l... Ul it 6' ::I --- ~F~~~~~-"c..:~~?",,,~,,,~;';~~~~'''~~,t, 1 ~_,::::-... , \ J I I I- I I I: \,/ 'I" "";', 'l "I' , I I ' ~ , m ~ 1,:/ e o z . , . ,I ~ , c m l',_ -'.- ,- ,':--.. ".. flll'--' .--.-.' \ \~~.~~'-""~~"'A--r" - ~ ). \, \\<~~",' .".i;\,'~~ J : i , \\\,~~:" f\ 'j i " ,'\ ;,~ ~, ' . , \ \ " r ~ : ....... '", \ I ' .. , \\' ,I IUI; '\' > : -, \,., r --1 . \'\"!'k- : I , '. ..\\ '-- ': :':r: I ,. \' I.'~. il I \\ j .. I' \ \. \- '!',' "~ ,I " \. \" t..;---,--~II '\,\'" ",,', ,'. \ \ ~) "I' I '\ \. .\ \, J I \\ \~\ .;t ~II '. ' "''. '\10'111 \ \. " ,\,.' '\' '-> ''::\1 \' '\ \11 \ ,\ I '\ ''OJ ~ m ~ ~ . i ~ m . c m " ..J .. - ':l:' _,rt -, -'- , rt PJ () ,', ::r s (I) =' rt . " l'V , ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q q ~ ~ ::: ~ .... Z II ~ ~ '" " c ~ " 5! III ~ '" ~ ~ '" N ; ;T; ~ "" . ~ ,- C C> '" '" .... f!l 1\1 q c 3 .. .. .. .g q 3 ~ , !l. !l. ~ '" ;.. ; ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ ::: ~ !l. ~ ., '" "l .. 'l. !l. ::1 ~ g g i " lE ~ 1!i ~ "l "l '" ~ C> .. ." ~ '" CO .. c .. ;; " c '" '" .... .. -< ~ 3 , c 3 .. .. .. . S! ~ m " .. " 3 ~ " !l. !l. " ~ ~ ~ '" ;; ~ " ~ ;; i V> "l V> !l. !l. !l. ~ .. ;; g ." .. < n' '" '" " '" < .. "- "- !!. .. ~ C> C c .. ;; .. -< " 3 , '" 3 0 9 " " .. " .. . ~ ;; ~ .. ~ ~ i 3 ~ g ~ .. .. < '" < "- .. "- .. 3 r--- ~ f1J U1 rTl f1J < o o ::J .., o c , ;; 3' '- " o 2. ~ )> I 11111'11111 ( fiI I r z ",0 r'" ",-< <:1: ~R- is z::;: VJ CTr VJ -< ~ o o .. n " '" .. " 3 ." Z < ~ e 3 '" .. s::> - , c ~ 0 :;- .. ~;;- 3 .. ~ .. .. '" .. ;;- .. m~ V> ::r '" !2 .. " , [ .. .. ~~ ~ ~ . . .. .. .. fTl . f1J < 0 0 :J ,. E' ." 3 9. 5 ~3 .. ~g g ~ o ~ IIllil"l '1'11 .-11.. ,!i!i!'11 ',.1'11 !.~H: 1/",1,1 /iii!1 f~ ~cn ~ ~ 3 g f D. "'C _ Y ~ en::T ~-'\:l I In a 2. e i ci" a ::l i,,1 i_. I ,'rl : I'U ~ I - <:' iF n .. i 1- ~ ..... IIi ~ tft 3 ~. f ;. . ~ , @u ~ g ~. ..., !g It " III ~ 0 ~ N N ~ Or. '" ~ i .. w "! ~ 0 CO , <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ~ q " q i " c C> ~ ~ ~ c 3 ~ 0 0 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::! ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ "- Z ;; ;; Q " " C> 0 r C .. c ~ ;; ~ 3 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ !!l ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ Q .;, r n ;; ~ ~ -nN ~ ~ r ~ "l [~ "l ~ < ;; ~ <1 < "- !!. 0 <1 <1 <1 "1 <1 <1 "- 0 " '" ~ 3 " 0 .:: 1i' ~ ;:' ~ 0 c 3 0 0 0 3 ~ 0 ~ "- ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ c., "- ~ -0 ~ "- ;; ;; Q " " C> a r C .. 0 ~ ;; ~ 3 ~ 0 ~ '" ~ !l ! . ~ D ~ :f ~ ~ r ;; r . ;; ~ < '" "- !!. D "- D ~ 3 0 0 3 fT1 'D < o <:> ~ 0 ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. ;; 0 C 3 3 " n 5 5 0 a 0 0 5 " 3 3 ;;; n ~ r " 0 0 '" c- o ~ ~ < 3 ~ ~ ~ n ~ 0 Vl 0 C ~ -::r ~ fT1 c 'n " " 0 ~ 0 n n 'D a n 5 0 ~ Co ;;; ;;; ~ < " " 0 ~ n ~ "- r 0 ~ ~ 0 0 " ~ 0 ~ , c- o Co < a " 0 a 3 !l ~ ~ ~ ~ ::J 5 ~ ~ J'-'--'-~' fT1 o U1 o ::J ~ I" I" 11/ "jlll. ,I'-.) I '0 In ,..,0 ,c rr1i! ;;: ='R> o Zrn In)> In ..... 1f/'i'''1 '1.111 J.'I,. !!ill!j' !I!!!!'! 'l'll:l!i 'I.!I!/ ~ ~ . 8 · l fp ~ ~ ~ . ~ 0 q "Ill/! c 0 3 c 'tl_ l/!:T -"Il !. 2. c)" 3- :J , ., ;!i, 1,1 I'll , t_ O' .' ~~ 8-< if f ~. ~ ~i ~ t::: ' 3 i~ ~ - . '" , . .g , PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC. Amendment No. 16 for Professional Engineering TO: Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 710 Miami, Florida 33131 DATE: July 12, 2004 Pursuant to the Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (Consultant) for Professional Engineering Services for the upgrading of Sewer and Water Pumping Stations (" the Agreement"), you are directed to provide the following services: Project Name: Preliminary Design Memorandum Uvdate, Final Re-Design, Preparation of Contract Plans and Specifications Scope of Work: Attached as Exhibit A Calendar time to complete this work: Fee for this Service Order: Subtotal Task A (Lump Sum) Subtotal Task C (Not-to-Exceed) Subtotal Task D (Lump Sum) Total Amendment No.16 (Not-to-Exceed) 10 months to Bid Advertisement $ 126,025 $ 89,905 $ 8.011 $ 223,941 Basic Service X Additional Service X Reimbursable Expense X ACCEPTED: City Clerk 9fs;foC/ Victor J. Pujals, P. Vice President ~rkJ. r tU J..- CITY OF MIAMI BEACH APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION 0- 2-/ ~ 0 y Date N:\KM1495.PSA.doc 9/15/2004 EXHIBIT A CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROJECT SCOPE AND BUDGET FOR SOUTH POINT W ASTEW A TER BOOSTER STATION PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEMORANDUM UPDATE, FINAL RE-DESIGN, PREP ARA TION OF CONTRACT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AMENDMENT No. 16 July 12, 2004 PROJECT: New Wastewater Booster Station Located at South Point on Miami Beach. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: As part of the design of the Pump Stations Upgrades preliminary design in 1992-1993, the City and CDM concurred that the least disruptive and most economically feasible option to meet the Level of Service for the wastewater transmission system was to construct a single new booster pump station at the downstream end of the wastewater transmission system in lieu of major structural and electrical upgrades at six existing pump stations. This option provided the benefits of greater operational flexibility for the City and lower force main pressures throughout the entire system, resulting in decreased operation and maintenance costs. CDM was authorized the original design project work under Amendment No.9. The preliminary design report (PDR) was submitted on May 13, 2002. The project was subsequently designed to the 30 percent level. However, the City requested changes due to the magnitude of the estimated cost of construction. This re-design amendment will include a letter report update to the preliminary design memorandum and final design of an in-line, 98 MGD (peak), partially underground, variable speed, two pump (one service, one standby) 1,500 HP (approx.) wastewater booster station and 54-inch diameter station by-pass force main located entirely on the former water tower site at First Street and Alton Road. Project includes an electrical control room, instrumentation, and generator/fuel tank on-site, SCADA interface, noise suppression, and architectural and landscape features. This amendment revises the design and permitting activities of the original scope. This bidding services and balance of the reimbursable allowance will remain from the original contract. PROJECT REFERENCE: Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM) dated July 21,1992, for professional engineering services for the upgrading of sewer and water pumping stations. SCOPE AND BUDGET: CDM will perform the additional work tasks described herein at the fees and costs listed. Proposed labor hours are provided by task in the following pages. This scope and budget supplements the scope and budget approved under Page 1 of 6 N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc 7/13/2004 Amendment No.9. BACKGROUND The City of Miami Beach (CITY) is approaching the construction of rehabilitation improvements of its existing wastewater pumping stations (PS). The flows developed in the Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City of Miami Beach Planning and Zoning Department, (October 1989) will exceed the capacity of the equipment installed in the Pump Stations Upgrades construction project scheduled to start in May 2004 without the addition of a new in- line booster station at South Point. It was analyzed previously that the required mechanical, structural, and electrical renovations required for the PS Upgrades Project would have been cost prohibitive and economically disruptive without the addition of a new in-line booster station on the southern end of the wastewater transmission system. Further, the new pumps being installed under the current Pump Stations Upgrades Project were designed specifically to work in concert with the new booster station and will not operate properly without the station. During the original design, the City proposed two valuable lots in the South Point area, to be occupied by the utility facilities. During the design, the City, requested that the additional property (lot 15) that was to be utilized for a remote electricalj generator building not be used. This caused CDM to shift all of the components to fit them onto the water tower site. This crowded site was further complicated by the required inclusion of a transformer the serve facility vault per Florida Power & Light and the discovery of a system of wooden piles remaining from the original water tank foundation. Prior to presentation of the Project to the DRB, the City requested an updated estimate of Probable Cost. CDM's estimated construction cost was significantly higher than the original "Design" budget established by the City in 1993. At that point the city requested that CDM revise the architectural features and explore the options to bring the Project back within the Budget. Changes to the Architectural Layout design of the pump station became necessary causing significant delays and costs associated with CDM adjusting its design to the new conditions. The deviation from the original design caused CDM and its subcontractors to expend additional time and effort to reduce the project scope while maintaining the functionality of the station (2 vs 3 pumps etc.) fitting the program into the water tower site. The estimated costs of the revised pump station exceed the current design budget. In addition, the Pump Station Upgrades Project is anticipated to be under construction in the second quarter of 2004. CDM and members of the City CIP, Public Works, and Planning staff met on February 4, 2004 to agree on a scaled down design. This design would keep most of the original elements while reducing the project costs and maintaining all the facilities on the water tank site. For these reasons, the CITY has asked CDM to provide a scope and budget (described below) to revise the design of the required booster station and allow for compensation for the additional design effort. Page 2 of 6 N:lJ<M1495.ExhA.doC 7/13/2004 A. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) (Amended) Al Design Services and Production of Contract Documents 1. Preparation of a letter report updating to the design memorandum with applicable sketches and renderings for the booster station, including landscape drawings, presenting the new layout option, and preliminary opinion of probable cost. 2. Preparation of EJCDC-based specifications and approximately 70 contract drawings, per the sheet list provided in Appendix A, describing the design and construction of the new booster station. 3. Preparation of an opinion of probable construction cost at the 60 and 90 Percent Completion Review. Perform a constructability reviews, and phasing/ scheduling plan to coordinate the work with the on-going Pump Station Upgrades construction project at the 90 Percent completion point. 4. Three coordination meeting with CITY Planners and coordinating with other projects in the area. Requested revisions to the design following the submittal and acceptance of the 60% construction documents by the City, if any, will constitute additional services. 5. Attendance at monthly (up to 10) progress meetings with the CITY during the course of the design phase of this project. Site Survey and Geotechnical subsurface investigations of the project site have been completed. Deliverable will be three sets (1 reproducible) of plans and one diskette of specifications in MS Word format 1 diskette containing AutoCAD plot file (Version 2000 or latest) for CMB procurement to produce and distribute as Owner. CMB will provide CDM three copies of the bid set, all addenda, and six copies of the executed contract documents. The total authorization fee for Task A Items 1 through 5 is a lump sum (LS) amount of $126,025. This amount excludes Reimbursables (listed later in item D). Design Services (Lump Sum) Subtotal COM Labor Outside Professional Service Architectural Landscaping Total Task A (LS) Amount $93,525 $30,000 $2,500 $126,025 Page 3 of 6 N:\KM149SExhA.doc 1113/2004 B. NOT USED C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES (AMENDED) C1 Provide additional permitting services related to Building Deparhnent, Fire Rescue, DERM and FDEP. Additional hours have been included for potential coordination with MDWASD in the relocation and re-design of the forcemain under Govenunent cut to Virginia Key. Through an architectural subcontractor, CDM will prepare and submit a DRB application and presentation. This submittal includes preparation and submittal of the application form, mailing to potential affected parties, and presentation to the Board. All permit fees shall be paid by the City. C2 Provide bidding services in accordance with the original scope of work. The upper limit of this task represents the difference in the hourly rates from the original date of the scope of work (2000) to the date of this scope of work (2004). C3 Provide supplemental services incurred as a result of the change in program, due to the addition of the FP&L transformer vault, reduction in the total buildable space, and delays in the project schedule. The total authorization for Task C is an Upper Limit (UL) of $89,905. Task Permitting/Bidding Services Amount C1 CDM Services (UL) $19,920 Outside Professional Servo Architectural (DRB) $10,000 Landscape $1,200 C2 CDM Services (UL) $1,785 C3 CDM Services (LS) $57,000 Total Task C (UL) $89,905 D. REIMBURSABLES The total additional authorization for Task D is a Lump Sum (LS) of $8,011. The reimbursable budget for the various tasks are as follows: Reimbursable Amount D.1 Design Services (LS) Total Task D (LS) $8,011 $8,011 ASSUMPTIONS 1. There will be no setback requirements of the pump station or other structure at the site with respect to the property line. Page 4 of 6 N:\KM1495.ExhA,doc 711 312004 2. The generator/ fuel tank will be skid mounted and located on the ground, outside of the building floor. The electrical MCC room will be on the second floor above the FPL vault, per CDM's design proposed concept. 3. The original architectural design concept (glass facade storefront system) is acceptable 4. There will need to be a new DRB application prepared and presented. 5. We have budgeted three meetings with Planning/ other interested parties 6. We will assume any meetings with MDWASD to coordinate the new transmission line will be covered under the Additional Services in Task C.1 of this Amendment. 7. We assume that the previous DRB process activities and costs ($10,000) will be covered under the original permitting task (C.l) scope and budget of Amendment No.9. DATA OR ASSIT ANCE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY 1. Locations of all existing underground, on-site utilities including as-built drawings and results of any soft-digs in the area of the proposed improvements. 2. Existing related project drawings, including record drawings of existing facilities not already available to CDM. 3. Assistance in discussions with regulatory agencies and City boards. 4. Submittal of documents to the various City departments for review prior to bidding. SCHEDULE Due to the need to complete this project in order that it can be bid or negotiated, constructed and placed on-line prior to or in conjunction with the completion of the Pump Stations Upgrades project assuming reasonable durations for the departmental and board reviews, etc., the following schedule outline is proposed: Milestone Time to Complete (as measured from NTP) o months 1 months 2 months 4 months 8 months 10 months Notice to Proceed Revised Preliminary Design Memorandum 30% Design Review Submittal 60% Design Review Submittal 90% Contract Documents, 100% Contract Documents Advertise for Bid Page 5 of 6 N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc 7/13/2004 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION Total Amendment No. 16 compensation for CDM services will be as follows: Task Amount A $126,025 B C $ 89,905 D $ 8,011 $223,941 This amendment is for additional services under Tasks A, C, and D in the amount of $223,941. The original Amendment No.9 dated March 15, 2001associated with this project was for a total compensation amount of $488,205. Amendment No.9 included Tasks A.1 (Design), C.1 (Permitting), C.Z (Bidding), and D (Reimbursables). The increase to tasks A, C and D will result in a total not-to-exceed amount of $71Z,146 for this project. CDM shall submit monthly invoices to the City. Each invoice shall include a monthly written status report. Invoicing for the lump sum, Task A, Task C.3 and D.1 will be based on the percentage of completion of the task. Invoicing for the not-to-exceed services, Tasks C.1, C.Z, and DZ, shall be billed on a time and materials basis at CDM's prevailing rates, Exhibit B. Page 6 of 6 N:\KM149S.ElChA.dOC 7f13/2004 CDM's SOUTH POINT BPS FEE PROPOSAL A. DESIGN SERVICES CDM Labor Hours CDM Labor Services Outside Professional Services: Survey Geotechnical Architectural Landscaping Payment Summary Original Task A Paid To Date Remaining Funds Additional Funding New Task A Cost to Complete Credit for Remaining Funds Additional Authorization Total Task A Authorization Initial Task A Authorization Additional Redesign Authorization Total Design Task A c. PERMITTING AND BIDDING SERVICES CDM Labor Hours (Cl and C2) CDM Labor Services (Cl) Outside Professional Services Architecture (New DRB) Landscaping (New DR B) CDM Labor Services (C2) Out of Scope Services (C3) Payment Summary Original Task Cl and C2 Paid to Date Remaining Funds (July 12, 2004) Original 3,690 hrs $346,860 $8,500 $3,500 $45,000 $0 $403,860 Original 644 hrs $31,840 $34,715 $66,555 Page 1 of 2 Costs to Complete 2,934 hrs $286,615 $0 $0 $ 61,500 $ 2,500 $350,615 $403,860 $179,270 $224,590 $ 350,615 ($224,590) $ 126,025 $403,860 $126,025 $529,885 Cost to Complete 500 hrs $47,155 $10,000 $ 1,200 $36,500 $57,000 $151,855 $66,555 $ 4,605 $61,950 N:\KM1495.Tbl.doc 7/13/2004 Additional Funding New Tasks Cl to C3 Credit for Remaining Funds Additional Authorization Total Authorization Initial Task C Authorization Additional Authorization Total Permitting/Bidding Task C1 D. REIMBURSABLES Original Subtotal (D.l) Subtotal (D.2) $16,252 $ 1,538 $17,790 Payment Summary: Original Task D.l, D.2 Paid to Date Remaining Additional Funding: New Task D Credit for Remaining Funds Additional Authorization Total Task D Authorization: Initial Task D Authorization Additional Reimbursables Total Reimbursables Task D SUMMARY OF COMPENSA nON Task Amendment No.9 Amendment 16 A $403,860 $126,025 B C $66,555 $89,905 D $17,790 $8,011 $488,205 $223,941 Page 2 of 2 $151,855 $(61,950) $ 89,905 $ 66,555 $ 89,905 $156,460 Cost to Complete $17,952 $ 1,538 $19,490 $17,790 $ 6,311 $11,479 $ 19,490 $(11,479) $ 8,011 $17,790 $ 8,011 $25,801 Total $529,885 $156,460 $25,801 $712,146 N:\KM149S. TbJ.doc 7/13/2004 SHEET No. GENERAL G-O G-l G-2 CIVIL C-l C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 ARCHITECTURAL A-l A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 LANDSCAPING L-l L-2 L-3 L-4 CDM APPENDIX A LIST OF DRAWINGS (6/25/04) SOUTH POINT WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION TITLE Cover Index and Legend Abbreviations Site Survey Site Demolition Plan Underground Demolition Plan Plot/Soil Borings Plan Grading Plan Yard Piping Plan Miscellaneous Civil Details Miscellaneous Civil Details Paving and Grading Miscellaneous Details Architectural/Sheet Index, Abbreviation and Symbols Pump Station Floor Plan Pump Station Floor Plan Pump Station Floor Plan Pump Station Elevation Pump Station Elevation Pump Station Schedules and Details Pump Station Schedules and Details Landscape Plan Landscape Specifications Irrigation Plan Irrigation Specifications A-1 N:IKM 1495.xl$ 719/2004 SHEET No. STRUCTURAL S-l 5-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 SD-l SD-2 MECHANICAL M-l M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6 MD-l MD-2 MD-3 HVAC H-l H-2 H-3 H-4 PLUMBING P-l P-2 P-3 CDM TITLE Structural Notes and Abbreviations Pile Foundation Plan and Details Intermediate Level Plan and Sections Roof Plan and Details Elevations and Details Schedules and Details Structural Details Structural Details Booster Pump Station - Pump Room Plan Booster Pump Station - Motor Room Plan Booster Pump Station - Sections Booster Pump Station - Sections Fuel Storage Tank, Schematic and Details Meter and Valve Pit Details Miscellaneous Mechanical Details Pipe Hangers and Supports HV AC Symbols and Abbreviations Pump Station HV AC Floor Plan Electrical Room HV AC Floor Plan HV AC Schedules and Details Plumbing Symbols and Abbreviations Pump Station Plumbing Floor Plan Plumbing Risers, Schedules and Details A-2 N:JKM1495.x1& 719/2004 SHEET No. ELECTRICAL E-l E-2 E-3 E-4 E-5 E-6 E-7 E-8 E-9 E-10 E-n E-12 E-13 E-14 INSTRUMENTATION 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6 1-7 1-8 1-9 CDM TITLE Electrical Symbols and Abbreviations Electrical Site Plan 4160 Volt Single Line Power Diagram 480 Volt Single Line Power Diagram Elementary and Generator Control Diagrams Instrumentation, Control and Instrumentation Upper Plan Equipment Elevations Pump Station Power, Control and Instrumentation Upper Plan Pump Station Lighting Upper Plan Pump Station Power, Control and Instrumentation Lower Plan Pump Station Lighting Lower Plan Fuel Storage Tank and Generator Plans Lighting Fixtures and Panel Schedules Electrical Details Instrumentation Legend Sheet Instrumentation Block Diagram Instrumentation P&ID Instrumentation Loops Instrumentation Loops Instrumentation Loops Instrumentation Loops Instrumentation Loops Instrumentation Details A-3 N:IKM1495.xrs 7/9/2004 CONI EXHIBIT B caw SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES COST GROUP II CATEGORIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: OFFICER PRINCIPAL / ASSOCIATE SEllllOR PROfESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL II PR'OFESSIONAL I PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES STAFFSUPPORTSER~CES FIEL.D SERVICES SENIOR PROfESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL PROJECT SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT ADMINISTRATION HOURLY RATES $ 1 SO.OO $ S $ $ 140.00 120.00 105.00 90.00 $ 90.00 S 75.00 $ 80.00 $ S5.00 $ 65.00 All subconsultant and other project related expenses arll subject to a minimum hanclingJadmini$tratillo charge of 1 0%. CERTifiED BY: RATES EFFECTIVE THROUGH JANUARY 1,2005 I 00 .... z W :r::i OW ~~ lOa -w :ill:: -ll:: ::i::> aLO O::l: ~~ o::i z o ~ 00 ll:: w .... 00 o o aI ll:: w ~ 3: w .... 00 ~ .... z o 0.. ::l: .... ::> o rn ~ ~ ~ II o Q ... II ~ '" O!: o II ... o ~ ;:: o :::> Q o ll: ~ <l ~ ~ o .. ..: " o ~ N ;:: 1Ii<"; o>t1: ~"~ {~ I-<=' 0.0 1-.:::.;: :-.~ 8::i et:,'- ~..~ '.h IL".D:: ~:'f .....IL ~.-:::l .'.:" ~'..~ O'!! Z:lI. ~::i 1&:.. ~>7 Gr", ~ 0,....;. a:.-':"" lI.,", ~::~ ~'.f ~. ~..~ ~.::! ~g f~ ,'Ii .. ,',-0 ::::.::: ....C! . ::2: ...~ ..'20 :::5 ,.. ','W '.'0 . 'c :;li :S:: ,., ,","<I( ~ o N '" ~. .. ~~~~88~g "'fLOIOOC\l 0I0l 6N"<<i",,-N"r-:WM MN IOMM...... 1l9~Il9~VJ~tIt'fl '" ~ \l)O<JlO<ctOvv ........,COIl'lL()O......... MN..........LO..,M...... ... 00000000 ~ 0<"'"1000000 ......to-::-n:!;::!<o<.O '" ~~~~~gf.5o o ;:1oo~f]go o N o;~g2~~:i5~ o N OmQNOOOQ ......."Tv.-<.Q<()C()l.O ... ~;!:<:ON~~~'<t .. 00""'0 '<t '<t'<to E o u c rn Q E m " c o , m o " rn c ~ w a: z o ;:: " z is 0: o o '-' h Z W " w 0: c- ::> o . '-' ;31: 0 ~~ g: " 0 (lJ ....."';:; S " U U ~~~ ~ ~!...~ ~ !:l-o 0 gj '5 g:.? '" lJ- Q) u 2:. c: 0 en :g 1II '~_m ~ ~ Ul~~~~ 1;!l:5~ g~~~~ le--a ~~z!::l~ ~~~<7l2:;g~G a~=:~~...J~ig ~o~~<.96~o::t; .r?Cl2'<t~OC~~<t (IJ~~ rol-~u::r: 2~u~~r:clI-~z Vl~LU>-l...J{fjf-O 8U~Ia...W~U'JU (lJ . ~ c o "' .. . . o ;; " '" is rn " ~ c o '-' u c rn ." u m n "' ,; i w . o '-' o ~ N N .. o '" o '" ;;; N ~ o ~ o N o N o o o ... o N o "' o '" ;' . ~ 5 " rn . <; . I'~ b '" fi '" E . c .Q " c i5 Q o '-' c ;; " o o .. o .; ;;; N .. '" o N :! o N .. '" N :0' :! o . c o jii 'E ~ . a: u c rn I~ 0; " " ;; .. do '" .. .. N do ., ~ = h c ii. . Q Ji o .. ~ of> '" "' :i .. ... ., .. N '" ... ~ .. .. .. N .... .,. ... 8 a ::l a a ~ a o g ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ '" 3 in g 'Q a o a Q Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ a g ~ a ~ ~ f j s " R c. N g '" '" ~ o ~ o a '" a o ;\ a '" a ~ ;I; '" N " '" 0: ::> o :!: 0: o (lJ :5 ::; o '-' "' N "' ..; ~ tI9 6f')1A '"" 0: o III <( ~ ::; o '-' "'-- ~~~ ~~~ (iio(!) cnw(i Who: ~~~ g:~~ ~<M cnti~ ~ :5 o _ " '" ::> 000 8 5=l ~ ON N M M H :'~ ~. ~ . i . "' N '" ui N ;::- <i ::; W E. w ~ ~ jO: o h n tl ~ ~ z !!! a lI) ~ lI) "t t-' ~ Ul ~ 0:: i: w t-' ~ Ul a ~ a al I!? 0:: lI) W tj Z !;;: W == S :I::iE w ffi OW t-' oc(O:: ~ C/) w- ...., al5 == ~ :f~ t-' a z j:: -0:: 6 :iE::J II. CS !La :I: Cl I a=f t-' "t ~~ ::J , a ... U:E Ul ti 0 0 N N a:: in 0> .. ,,; .,; 0, .. ;;; ~ :! .. .. '0 .u :{l:1 '" :g .....::1 0 g~ N N ci: ~ ~ 6 c 0 0 C 0: .. .. 0; 0: ~ ~ ~ ",. Ii: c ~ 0 ~ 6 c 0: ~. ~ .tr:!i ....11). ~ '0: Ii: C '0 '0 ~ .. c Z 0: 0-: '" ::l ... c ." ~ :U? ".;.;.> :5 0 OJ 0: .~ .. 0; 0: OJ ~ :i>. 0 eo :5 0; 0:. '" .. " ~. ~ '0: ,,,,. " '0 .0 0 eo c 'z 0; 0: .. ... N w. ~: ;:;; ..,. i~ :5 ~] ~ eo 0; :..... ~ o:~ ;:;; :~< .0:' c ,W c .U .. '.. '" it '" :::'P: ;:;; 0 (/) ~ ;;: 0 "-:.z. ::;; ~ >'-0 E <Ii: .". .;; .. -:<~ '" .t;;. :<.u c ,~ 0 .....ctJ 'in .." ....w '" .~ '.0 ~ -~ u ::::~: '" 1i Ci :g ,',<( Ij :::;~. .f-: 'R ....(1) " ..~ 'E U1 " 0.. E " ~ 0 ro ~ c '" .g ~ '6 ... " o! ~ OJ f~ ~~ I." <i '" sI il ~ ~ . ~ o " . N o o ~ .. o w '" o . w o o o ,,; o o '" .. " 0 'E ., ::; ~ 0. 2- 0 '" 0 0 oeo N 0 N 0 ~~ '" N 0> "! ,,; ;: ~ ~ "'.., '" '" ... .. II 00 (/) rj 00 rj lr ON ::> ::;; d~ E 0 w ,1! J: !:. ro 0:: 0 lr 15 '" 0 .. '" .. :5 '" ::;; :5 ~~~f2 0 ::;; <( .- ClI 0... U 0 ziiMo u ~~~ci cn(:Q-l1- W 0:: [D 0 u. 0 0:: J- ~ 0 ~ 0.. '" W 0 en .. ::> 0 ;,- 0 0> . fj ~ .0 " S n ;; 8 tJ z ~ 0 ~ ~ !!1 I- C/) en C/) 0:: q; W Cl I- ~ en Q 0 9 0 aI 1XI en 0:: [Z W I- ~ Z 0 W ~ s: :r:;: W lfi UW I- <0:: ~ C/) w- ..J ala ~ -w I- :f0:: 0 Z f: -0:: 0 :;::;, 0.. cs !LO ::I: Q I 0::1: q; ~z I- :;, '" -< 0 ti u:;: en '" '" <Xl <Xl it:>in .... "'- ;;; ~ 0.'1- .. 5:g . u :{::! <:> <:> '""",':1 g~ N N " .;,:-1- " fil..~' ~ N " ~ ci ...~ ~ '" ..... .. .. 0: " ~. 0 <:> .; " .. ci .~ .. ... :> '" .. .,..... !r.'D:' " :~::~ <:> :0. " .0 1:1'" ~ .:> '" .-:II? .....: I l~ I. " <:> 10 " ci ~ > '" I", " is Ie " - <:> ci '0: " ... ;;; 0: :~. " 0 0 " z '" '" ci .0: '" W ~: WI ;;; i'" ~I g <:> <:> " :': '0:. '" a:..' .0: I I" " .W " U '" ~ it ~ .>P: ;;; 0 U) <( ;:; 0 ",-.Z ::;; ~ "'0 :; ::::~ ~ ;; .. WI ~: ....Q:. c -:u 0 ","II) '~ ";;: w WI . :-:0 ~ Q u . '0 .. .,. :-z <5 Q ..'...; 11; ..... ':..'" c .0 <n. B .:> :.>~. E <n " a. E " i!' 0 'iij ;;; c <.:J .g ;:; -0 ~ '0 "" <( <Xl ~~ 8" -~ .. " WI ~ ~ .. Q . ~ " '" ... .. '" '" " " .. '[' ::J " "- "- 2- '" <:> '" '" '" .. N <Xl <Xl .. "' t--. t--. t--. ~ .,. .. .. II N U) t.i t.i '" ::J ::;; E 0 w ~ :x: ~ OJ '" 0 '" '5 al 0 ... ::i al ::;; ::i 0 ::;; u 0 u " g, -" ~ Ii '" s " 8 ft z 0 ~ I-' O!: III Q; ~ W I-' III Cl 0 0 ~ 1lI Q; rn W 50 I-' !;( III z W :: II) J:::;; W .... UW I-' ~ c(Q; ~ w- O!: 1lI5 !Ii] ~~ I-' Ll./ z ~ -Q; is ::;;:;) ....0 a. I OJ: J: II) ~~ I-' :;) '" 0 u::;; III U <:> <:> <:> C> v v v .N in V .., "" '" ."'. en ..: '" '" '0 ... N .. .. ... .~ '" .. ... O. U. .~ .. ... '" N 0; N ." '" "' .. 0 .~. N ~: ... " .,. ... g O. ~. <:> "" ;? .... '" v ... 00' 0 :0;. .~ ~ .. ,;. .... "'. g ~ 0 <:> ;? <:> '" .... N ... ~ .. .,. " ... ., 0::: ... "'. " 0 ~ ~ <:> <:> '" " .Z ~. '" ::I. .. ~ ". .. .,. ... " 0 ~. <Xl <:> <:> ~: 0 '" C ... ~ ... is <:> <:> ;? " g - ~ ~ '" <Xl N ~. .. .. li:::: ,.: " '0. 0 0 ;? 0 " 0 Z ~ ." 0 W "'. N .~ ~ ..,. .. ... 'lW ~l " " 0 0 <Xl .. " Z' ~ ;:: ;;; :~.: ,: :-:<oi: g ....W '" ,",0' <Xl ... ... '" ....jF ~ ~ .....0 ... -:% ." '.'0 "JI:- ':j::' ." ... :->a. ~ ....01 [~ <) "C .:.U) 0 j 'W .~ ".-:0 . >"0 a. :<i "C Z ~ "0 <( "C r- :.>,.,. c ~ ~ .lJ ....0 X ." :~ W I~ .~ I~ CO 3 <( 0 c I~ 0 CO '5 ~ ,Q " ~ ~ 1ii "C il CO ~ '" a: :e a: :; .i!l 0 ;;; ~ 0 0 '" u; u U <Xl ~8 :J~ ~- <I' ~ ~ Q . ~ " N ~ '" " " '" " "' .., " " "' '" " " ". " " " ,,; '" ~ " N 'E :;) III :; a. 0; ::;; a. :;) a. 2- :::!. " .., 0 0 " 0 ., <Xl N 0 N 0 " '" "' "' " '" N ... ,: 0 ... on ,..:: It) .. .. .. .... II 0 .., 00 u 0 U a: "' ::> ::;; i. E 0 W ~ I) I !=. g a: W 0 a: 0 III I- al 0 .. :;) :5 al :5 OO..JOO ::;; ;;!ii!~ 0 ::;; U 0 2::>0 U 01--, UjU< ooWI- Wt:O LLII- OUal a:a:::> "--tOO w 0 1ii I- ::> 0 1:- g, . B 0 .0 " ;;- n " 8 COM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ESTIMATE OF DIRECT COSTS SOUTH POINT WASTEWATER BOOSTER STATION D.1.REIMBURSABLES (DESIGN SERVICES) 12.Jul-04 OTHEROIRECT:COSTS' ..:. : QUantity ::: :':IJ.n1ts::.:.' ........:Rate:... . ":::CO.9t .-........ 6 ea ((j) $ 3IJOOIJ $ 1,800,00 11 per day $ 21.0IJ $ 231.00 29 car-days S 6.00 $ 174,00 4 Derdav $ 45.DO $ 180.00 4 ea $ 115.00 $ 460,00 4 ea S 125.00 $ 500,00 0 ea $ 150.00 $ - 296 hrs $ 6.00 $ 1,776.00 25 ea ( $ 35.00 $ 875,00 9 ea ( $ 3500 $ 315,00 1 ea lal $ '1500 00 $ 1,500,00 1 ea lal $ 21J0.OO $ 200.00 Travel Airfare (RfT) Meals Parking Car Plans and Specifications Preliminary Draft Final Reproducibles and Final CD Computer Charges: Data Assembly, Modeling, CAD T eleDhone/Omnifax/Delivery/Courrier/Post Miscellaneous Supplies, Aerials/Maps, Oversize Printing Consuelo M, Quintana URG TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COSTS (ITEM 0.1) Total $ 8,011 CDIII KM1495TBLXlS dn_odcs 7/1212004