2004-25680 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-25680
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 16, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE,
INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF SEWER &
WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION
ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY; SAID AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE
SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION
PROJECT.
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2002, the City's engineering consultant,
Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM), submitted a Preliminary Design Report that
included two design options for the proposed South Pointe Wastewater Booster
Pump Station (the Project); and
WHEREAS, due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the
adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation,
including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks, and other items, were to be
located off-site at the nearby City-owned lot located at the intersection of
Commerce Street and Jefferson Avenue; and
WHEREAS, at that time, residents and City Departments concurred that Option
2, a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility, was the most feasible,
as opposed to Option 1, which included all of the facility components on-site,
configured within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and
WHEREAS, CDM was authorized to proceed with the design
development of Option 2; and
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2003, CDM advised the City that they
would be unable to serve the rectangular site at the intersection of Alton Road and
Jefferson Avenue remotely as planned; and
WHEREAS, CDM decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the
structure, resulting in significant modifications to Option 2, as originally presented to
the Planning Department staff and residents; and
WHEREAS, an updated cost estimate showed an increase from the
$6.9 million dollars, estimated in the Preliminary Design Report, to a range of
between $8.5 to $11 million dollars; and
WHEREAS, CDM was requested to provide documentation to support
the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design
development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the Project closer to
the City's original construction budget; and
WHEREAS, in order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be
necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2;
and
WHEREAS, accordingly, the Administration has negotiated fees for an
Amendment No. 16, to the City's Agreement with CDM, dated July 21, 1992, for
professional engineering services for the upgrade of sewer and water pumping stations
and a new pumping station on the MacArthur Causeway, and recommends the
appropriation of funding, in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe
Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMi BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and
City Commission approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to the Agreement between the City
of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, for
Professional Engineering Services for the Upgrade of Sewer & Water Pumping
Stations and a new Pumping Station on MacArthur Causeway; said Agreement to
provide additional architectural, engineering and landscape architectural services to
re-design the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Sept. ,2004.
ATTEST:
!dbk e~L-
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
F:\CAPI\$all\DIXC\lO SOUTH POINTE W ASTEWA TER BOOSTER PUMP STA TION\CDM AMEND NO 16 RDA RESO.doc
g -J:J4)j
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, authorizing the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941, to an existing Agreement between
the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, to provide
Additional Architectural, Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater
Booster Pump Station (the Project).
Issue:
Shall the Commission approve Amendment No. 16, in the amount of $223,941, to an existing Agreement
between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., to provide Additional Architectural,
Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station
Proiect?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
On May 10, 2002, the City's Consultant CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design
alternatives for the proposed booster pump station. Due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the
adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault,
generator, fuel storage tanks and other items, were to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15,
Block 51. At that time, residents, and City Departments concurred that Option 2 (attachment 2) was the most
feasible, and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development.
On January 9,2003, CDM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the site remotely as planned.
Consequently, the design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure. With this change, it
became evident that there were significant modifications to the Option 2, originally presented to the Planning
Department staff and residents. An updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6.9 million dollars
estimated in the Preliminary Design Report to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million dollars,
CDM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building
components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the project
closer to the City's original construction budget. In order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be
necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2.
The Administration has negotiated the fees for, and recommends the execution of Amendment No. 16, in the
amount of $223,941, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape Architectural Services
to Re-desion the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Finance Dept.
Source of
Funds:
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin
Carla Dixon, Ext 6264.
AGENDA ITEM Rl c..
DATE e,-g-OC(
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
http:\\miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: DATE: September 8, 2004
FROM: ~
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY MMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 16 IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO AN
EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF
SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION
ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES TO RE.DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER
PUMP STATION PROJECT.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution.
FUNDING:
Funding for this Project, in the amount of $223,941, is available from the South Pointe RDA
Fund.
ANALYSIS:
On July 8, 1992, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 92-20540, authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the firm of Camp, Dresser and
McKee, Inc. (CDM), to provide architectural, engineering services for the upgrade of the
sewer and water pumping stations, and to design a new Water Booster Pump Station on the
Mac Arthur Causeway.
In the year 2000 Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City's Planning and Zoning
Department, it was determined that the existing pump station equipment had exceeded its
capacity, surpassed its useful life, was inefficient and presented additional operation and
maintenance costs without the construction of a new in-line booster station at South Pointe.
The alternative to providing a new South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station would
be major structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades at five (5) existing pump stations
downstream of Pump Station (PS) 28B (PS Nos. 1,10,11 ,28D, and 31). Consequently, the
South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project was identified as a priority, and the
Public Works Department recommended its construction.
Commission Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 2
On January 31 , 2001, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24243, approving
Amendment NO.9 to its 1992 Agreement with Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc., (CDM) to
provide Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master
Booster Pump Station in South Pointe.
Project Limits:
The proposed pump station is to be located on Alton Road and 1 st Street. This triangular
property is bounded by the rights-of-way of Jefferson Avenue to the east, Alton Road to the
West, First Street to the north, and the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Alton Road at
Commerce Street to the south.
Project Scope:
Construction of 2-1500 HP Pumps with a 54-inch diameterforce main, by-pass, FPL vault,
transformers, control room, emergency generator, fuel storage tanks, HV AC and ventilation
system, SCADA controls, architectural treatments, and landscaping.
On May 10, 2002, the City's Consultant, CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that
included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station, Option 1
(Attachment 1) which includes the configuration of all the components on-site arranged
within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and Option 2 (Attachment 2) a
three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility with the pumps housed on the 1 st
floor, electrical room and generator on the 2nd floor.
Due to site constraints that included the existing 54-inch diameter force main which runs
diagonally to the property, and the triangular shaped site, CDM sought to provide vehicular
maintenance access, minimize utility relocation, simplify pipe runs, and curtail the size of the
structures while maintaining the facility aesthetics. CDM intended to lessen the impact on
the adjacent residential properties. The FPL vault, standby generator, fuel storage tanks
and other components vital for the pump station were originally to be located off site at the
nearby City owned Lot 15 Block 51 located at the intersection of Jefferson and 1st Street. At
that time, the Residents, Planning and Public Works Departments concurred that Option 2
was the most feasible and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development.
On January 9, 2003, CDM reported to the City that concurrent to the preparation of the thirty
Percent (30%) construction drawings, the CDM design team decided to incorporate the FPL
vault into the structure, as they were advised by the City of the unavailability of a remote site
to place this and other components. On January 14, 2003, the City immediately held a
meeting with CDM and their consulting architects-Zyscovich Architects, to discuss the
changes. During this meeting the City's consultant presented a revised site plan
incorporating the FPL vault into the structure. It became evident to the City that there was
significant modification to Option 2, and an increase in the building footprint.
The revised structure was taller, larger, and more massive than originally presented to the
Planning Department staff and residents, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement conditions.
The City directed its consultant to prepare conceptual elevations of the new structure(s)
reflecting the new building height, and massing. In addition, to schedule a meeting with the
Planning Department staff to review and evaluate those proposed changes prior to any
Commission Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 3
decision to proceed beyond the thirty percent (30%) design development level, and further
presenting the Project to the Design Review Board (DRB).
The City directed CDM to provide an updated engineer's estimate of probable construction
cost. On April 28, 2003, City staff met to discuss the increase from the $6.9 million dollars in
the Preliminary Design Report of May, 2002, to a range of between $8.5 to $11 million
dollars in the engineer's estimate of probable cost dated April 9, 2003. Due to the significant
increase in the cost of the construction, CDM was requested to provide documentation to
support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone further
design development until the submittal and acceptance of an option that would bring the
project closer to the City's original construction budget.
CDM attributed the increase in the project cost to changes prompted primarily by the
unavailability of lot 15, Block 51. The pump station components were reconfigured on the
triangular site, the FPL sub-station type transformer was placed within the building structure
versus pad mounted outdoor, relocation of the bypass force main, yard piping and
generator, changes in the HV AC design, on site location of the fuel tank, and demolition and
disposal of abandoned pile caps from the previous elevated water tank not reflected in the
topographic survey.
City staff and CDM explored several options to bring the project closer to its original budget,
including:
· The use of 2-1500 HP Pump vs. 3-900 HP Pump option. CDM advised that the City
would realize an immediate cost savings in excess of $200,000, by implementing this
change. The Public Works Department, after evaluation of operations, maintenance
and repair options agreed to the use of the 2-1500 HP Pumps.
· Re-evaluation of the ownership, availability and use of Lot 15, Block 51, in an
attempt to offer more flexibility to the design team for the placement of the building
components. However, Planning Department staff did not approve of the use of a
prefabricated fuel tank and generator modular unit with landscape screening at this
prominent site. Staff later agreed to fit the modular unit within the triangular site, with
landscape screening. Although the modular unit will add to the already restricted
site, significant cost savings will of up to $900,000, will be realized as this reduces
the structural requirements of the Option 2 building.
On September 12, 2003, CDM requested additional compensation from the City in the
amount of $69,000, for providing supplemental out-of-scope services incurred as a result of
the change in the program. Re-design of the structure to add the transformer vault (at the
30% design submittal), reorganization of the site, structural components and piping layout,
and coordination during an extended contract term due to delays in the project originally
scheduled to be completed in the Fall of 2002. Of this amount, the City has only approved
$57,000 included in the Subtask C - Additional Services below.
In order to reduce the project cost by a significant amount, it will be necessary to re -design
the layout of the primary components originally approved in Option 2. The majority of the
thirty percent (30%) design documents already produced by CDM will be discarded, in order
to accommodate the components on site within a less massive structure, while maintaining
the construction budget. During the Amendment No. 16 negotiation process CDM, on the
Commission Memorandum - COM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 4
behalf of Zyscovich Architects, requested additional Architectural Services fees in the
amount of $96,500. Of this amount, $35,000 was solely associated with the DRB
presentation and approval process.
Upon a review of the original Agreement, it was determined that CDM was obligated to
present the Project to the DRB until final acceptance, and therefore, the City could not
justify this portion of the fees. The parties could not arrive at an agreement with the existing
design team for both budgetary as well as time constraints. CDM proposed, and the City
agreed to the reorganization of the existing design team resulting in a more acceptable fee
for architectural treatments and the DRB presentation. CDM has selected ST A Architectural
Group for architectural design services on this Project. The original Additional Services fee
requested by CDM for the re-design work to the thirty percent (30%) level, including
Additional fees for the extended Contract term was $271, 176, the final amount resulting
from the negotiations is $223,941 as follows:
A. Architectural and Enaineerina Services
Task A.1
Subtotal CDM Labor.................................. ... ............ ........................... .... $ 93,525
Outside Professional Services:
Architectural. .. ... ... ... . . . ... .. . . .. . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. ... ... .. . . . . ... . .. ...... . . . . . .. . .... ... ... ... . $30,000
Landscaping... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....... ... ...... ... ..,$ 2.500
Total TaskA (Lump sum) ......... ...... ... ...... ... ............ .............$126,025
B. Not Used
C. Additional Services - Permittina/Biddina Services
C.1 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ... ...... ... ...... ... ......... ... ... ... ... ... ............ ... .....$19,920
Outside Professional Services:
Architectural (DRB) ..................... ............................................................ ..$10,000
Landscape (DRB) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ...... ........ ... ... ......... ............. $ 1,200
C.2 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ...$ 1,785
C.3 CDM Services (Lump Sum) ............ ..................................................... $57.000
Total Task C (Upper Limit) .................................................. $89,905
D. Reimbursables
D.1 Design Services (Lump Sum) ............................................................... $ 8.011
Total Task D (Lump Sum) ....................................................,$8.011
Total Amendment No 16 (Not-to-Exceed)......................... ....$223,941
The Agreement specifies that the completion of the design and advertisement for Bid shall
be within ten (10) months of the approval of Amendment No. 16 by the City Commission.
The project Advertisement for Bids, construction contract negotiations, and construction are
targeted to be completed concurrently with the on-line placement of the Pump Stations
Upgrades Project or shortly thereafter.
CDM's responsibilities under Amendment No. 16, (Attachment 3) for the Redesign of the
South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station will include, but are not limited to, Design
and Production of one hundred percent (100%)Contract Documents, providing all Permitting
related services, DRB application, presentation and acceptance, Bidding Services.
Commission Memorandum - COM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 5
Conclusions:
The City has negotiated with CDM, fees for Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941
to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser McKee Inc.,
dated July 21, 1992, to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape
Architectural Services for the Re-Design of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump
Station Project., and based upon the above stated, the Administration recommends the
execution of same.
Attachments
T:\AGENDA \2004\Sep0804\Consenl\CDM AMENDMENT N0l6 MEMO.doc
N
: ,'"
~ >...
It .'
...
.QI i~o N
~, l!l-o'<
~ ~fd? ~
5!::i gO
. N ~:S,
g U1 -< 0
i>> S ~:r
~ ii1' ~:;
8)C 0.. ~
.: l!l ..
... '" N
- ~ 8
A 3
~ Ii)"
- 2
;: ~ '"
Qi" 00
2 ~ 5-
m t!i.::T
: . "
.g. ~ 2.
:!! ~. ~
~ ~;!'
m ~ 3
il'D
'"
it
~
o'
'"
-,
..1,
1
"
--'-cr~~r .:1,"' ~.~ r J
.i .: '1' " \ i
p . . . I
i I'~ i'
'.1 r._-:.-_.._...I,. J ,',
", --~-, I
. I,. I
l~l7 I:
~ '\ r
fl;.-j !
"~I
'., \..;'ft-LT7-"r~ ~":"""-'
\-'.('\,1:: ;.
\. \ ,:,-r
\' It '
,\/1, i_
\Yl!
\ '11('
, ,\ ~ '
r'-:\ ",_ ': ~t
\~J '. '~'"''
, 1
~'I '~
.'., !
, ~ ,
'., \:.\\ 1
,\ '. ,I-,
\$.']' \~j
i
I
':i
! i~
ill
'"
I~
,
I
I
" ,
"
:!I
I; .\ '(:;ii'-:";:)~ i
-',..,' .~ \._~ ~_ __l:,} I
\\ \:-::.."v' ','JI ;
'\~~ \\-' I I
... \ \ 1:
\ \'\1'
\ \. ~ i
, \.. ,~
"~
\.
~"
"- ",
'lb'\
'{,
\
\
'~ :\
. (....
" '
, ',\',
"~'
\
,
_..-l
:J:'
rT
rT
III
0
::r
i3
CD
0 )0- ;:l
c: rT
'tl ttl
- c: ~
o' ~
= ...
... .0
N
<:l
0
~
- -. - '
~~~:?:,~":'f?3~~;~....'i~~"i.:~;1 '.,-~>
.~' ",
\~., \
;....\
["
\;-- - ,--
\\\~~~-_~~~1~~=::\c-r>1 :~--f
, ~ '; f\ ,j I
\, \;\;', f" i ;
'. \\' I ICI!I
'0, \., f ' )
\ ,<:..{, 'I
'. \:- '~l':"- ~ t; I
\ '- . " ,
'.' , I 0 .~ . Ii
,~ I .. I'
\ 'id' J ' (I
.' \, ,_,_'u' I
\\ \\ Y'\,i I
\, \'<, \\~}~II
\ \ ';, \~il
'\' '~'t\1
\ ~ \~:~\l II
, \ '
\ \.1:
,
,
"',
,
'L
m
~
~
m
>>
i
~
m
z
e
m
1; ~ '"
m 6' 0
2. :::J C
f ;n ~
.,.:7
, 'D
;r ~ 2.
"Tl =;,':J
~ ;; ~
.. ~ ~
il'D
'"
it
~
0"
'"
-'>
o >-
'C .6
_ c
o' !!
::::I ...
'" !'"
N
CI
CI
~
':J:oi
__ _ _, '__ rI"
,rI"
PI
,0
,;:T
';3
ro
~
rI"
t.. ,...., -'
N,
~ m , ~ 1l, ~i::
~, ~ :::: '" ~ ... Z
II ~ . '0 '" " ~
I.lS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
. ; iT; '" q
." ~ C '" '" '" ~ PJ $
q c . 3 . 0 0 0 "l
3 ~ ~ !t !t ~ ;1 '" ~ . ;.
~ ~ "!
~ ~ ~ '" :::. ..
on ~ on 0 ~ 2- 2- ::f ~ ~ "
a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z u '" 0 ~ ~
~ '" c: .. c . g ~ c '" .. ~
0 -< ~ 3 ~ c 3 0 0 0
. E ~ "' ~ . ~ 3 . ~ !t !t ~
~ g :!. ~ ~
~ ;;- on
~ ~ a ~ '" ~ on !t 2- !t
~ . a a
. ~ n' .. ." '" ."
< :!. 2- 0 z c: c . 0
:!. 0 ~ '" ~ 3 ~ g
.. 3 u -< ~ ~ . ~
0 . );1 ~ il :!.
0 ~ '" ~
3 ~ a
~ .
. ~ ..
~ :!. 0
0
3
r---
:;E
<1J
(fl
/T]
<1J
<
o
o
::J
~
o
c
~
o
3'
.~
"
o
!1.
~
J>
,
I!J 111'1111 ~
I ill
I I
z
...,0
,:>0
...,-<
<::I:
~R'
o
z::;:
l/J fTl
(fl
-<
"-.)
o
o
"
,.
n 0-
~ 0 ~ 3 ~
, 0 3 0
Z . n ~ 3 c 3
,. .- . - 3 ;;-
0 -.
. ~ . 0 0
0 ~
0 m", 0 on
"J" 0 !e 0- , ~
0 D ~g ~
~ . n
. 0 0 0
III .
-
<1J
<
0
0
:J
,.
E'
'tl 3
9. 5
~ c
[3
~
~~
g ~
o ~
!llll111 "Uf/) MI I co
1.1...1. f ~ Co i~
!!~i!ii ~ i 3 C It il: f g,
:r ~ 'D" IL"
Ii ~ ",'" 'ili ~r! ~
!!!mj: ' ~ ..-0
f~ .. 0
il~:I.1 e 5' I II . ~'! {D
. ; g .. . .
I;;~I I . g
~
~ g ..., '"
. " 0
llS ~ '" '" :., ~ ;. :" ~ 1i!
i , " ~ "! ": '"
, 9 9 , , ,. ;
q 9 9 9 9 9 q
" " <> '" '"
::! c ....
c 3 ~ a a a
ii 3 ~ ~ !!. !!. ~ ::l
~ ~ !ill
'" '" ;; !!. !!. !!.
0 0 !f "
" <>
~ c: .. c ~ ~
~ 3 ~ a
a ~ "' " ~ ... ~
. ~ ;; ~
~ :f '" !f '" 23~ . . .;.
~ 0 0: ~ :::
~ ~ 9 g ~ 9
~ < ;;' '" 9 9 " , ,
< '!. e. a 9 ... ~ 9 9 9
'!. a " OJ
'" 3 " c .:: <> '" '" ....
a c 3 ~ a a a
a 3 ... a ~ e. !!. ~
3 ... ~ ~
'" "-~ !!.
'" -0. !!. !!.
0 0 !f "
" <> 0.
~ c: .. c ~ ;;
... 3 ~
a ... "' ~ ~ !
~ ~ .. '" a
~ ~ 0 !f
~ ~
~ < '"
< '!. e. 0.
'!. a
'" 3
a
a
3
V1
0
c
::r 3:
fTJ .
0 ITl e: " "' "
a g 0.
If) n n 3 ~
ro "
0. .. .. g
< ~ "- "-
a ~ n ~ ~ '"
fTJ a a a '" a
c '" [ ~
<:> , " c "-
~ C 3 < " "-
CO a 0 5 ~ ~ ~ a ~ a
< ;; ::J
0 "
3: .
0 ~ ,. ,.
e: " c
::J 3 3 ...
n 3 3 0.
0' c c 3
0. 3 3 ..
n ;;- "-
a ;; '"
" .. .. C
3 ~ ~ g
~ . a
~
I~
,-
IN
'0
,1111111 ;
; i.,
r !111WI
1,111,1.
J"'dl
!'!i!;I/
Jll!I!I"
~'II;I'
g".1
li~i!l
VI
rlO
,C
1'1",
;;
:::!R>
o
Zr
till>
U1
--<
"'en
c: 0
3 c:
'0_
","'"
-"ll
!. 2.
c)" a.
:J
n
~, '"
r"
~ ~
, =
If
, .,
!!h
f'U
I
r_
,.
.. r~
8.:t
~ n 0
~,f ~ -~
till_ ~
~3" 3
-., (I -
~"'I Jil
.g
,
RESOLUTION NO. 478-2004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RATIFYING
AMENDMENT NO. 16, IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,941, TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP,
DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21,1992, FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE
OF SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW
PUMPING STATION ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY; SAID
AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL,
ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER
PUMP STATION PROJECT; AND APPROPRIATING $223,941,
AVAILABLE FROM THE SOUTH POINTE REDEVELOPMENT
AREA TAX INCREMENT FUNDS.
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2002, the City's engineering consultant,
Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM), submitted a Preliminary Design Report that
included two design options for the proposed South Pointe Wastewater Booster
Pump Station (the Project); and
WHEREAS, due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the
adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation,
including the FPL vault, generator, fuel storage tanks, and other items, were to be
located off-site at the nearby City-owned lot located at the intersection of
Commerce Street and Jefferson Avenue; and
WHEREAS, at that time, residents and City Departments concurred that Option
2, a three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility, was the most feasible,
as opposed to Option 1, which included all of the facility components on-site,
configured within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and
WHEREAS, CDM was authorized to proceed with the design
development of Option 2; and
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2003, CDM advised the City that they
would be unable to serve the rectangular site at the intersection of Alton Road and
Jefferson Avenue remotely as planned; and
WHEREAS, CDM decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the
structure, resulting in significant modifications to Option 2, as originally presented to
the Planning Department staff and residents; and
WHEREAS, an updated cost estimate showed an increase from the
$6.9 million dollars, estimated in the Preliminary Design Report, to a range of
between $8.5 to $11 million dollars; and
WHEREAS, CDM was requested to provide documentation to support
the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and postpone design
development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the Project closer to
the City's original construction budget; and
WHEREAS, in order to significantly reduce the Project cost, it will be
necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved Option 2;
and
WHEREAS, accordingly, the Administration has negotiated fees for an
Amendment No. 16, to the City's Agreement with CDM, dated July 21, 1992, for
professional engineering services for the upgrade of sewer and water pumping stations
and a new pumping station on the MacArthur Causeway, and recommends the
appropriation of funding, in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe
Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND
MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, that the
Chairman and Members of the Miami beach Redevelopment Agency approve and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 16, in the amount of
$223,941, to the Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser &
McKee, Inc. (CDM), dated July 21, 1992, for Professional Engineering Services for
the Upgrade of Sewer & Water Pumping Stations and a new Pumping Station on
MacArthur Causeway; said Agreement to provide additional architectural,
engineering and landscape architectural services to re-design the South Pointe
Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project; and appropriating $223,941, available
from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Sept. , 2004.
I~r f a4---
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
& LANGUAGI
& FOR EXiQI1'IQII.
ATTEST:
~Cf-OY
v...
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
A Resolution of the Chairman and Members of the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency ratifying
Amendment No, 16 in the amount of $223,941 , to an existing Agreement between the City of Miami Beach
and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc (COM), dated July 21, 1992, to provide Additional Architectural
Engineering, and Landscape Architectural Services for the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station
(the Project); and appropriating $223.941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax
Increment Funds,
Issue:
Shall the Redevelopment Agency ratify Amendment No, 16, in the amount of $223,941, to an existing
Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc" and appropriate funding
in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe RDA Tax Increment Funds?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
On May 10,2002, the City's Consultant COM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that included two design
alternatives for the proposed booster pump station, Due to site constraints and to lessen the impact on the
adjacent residential properties, components vital for the pump station operation, including the FPL vault,
generator, fuel storage tanks and other items, were to be located off site at the nearby City owned Lot 15,
Block 51, At that time, residents, and City Departments concurred that Option 2 (Attachment 2) was the most
feasible, and COM was authorized to proceed with its design development.
On January 9,2003, COM advised the City that they would be unable to serve the site remotely as planned,
Consequently. the design team decided to incorporate the FPL vault into the structure, With this change, it
became evident that there were significant modifications to the Option 2, originally presented to the Planning
Department staff and residents, An updated cost estimate showed an increase from the $6,9 million dollars
estimated in the Preliminary Design Report to a range of between $8,5 to $11 million dollars,
COM was requested to provide documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building
components, and postpone design development until the acceptance of an option that would bring the project
closer to the City's original construction budget In order to significantly reduce the Project cost, will be
necessary to re-design the primary components of the originally approved in Option 2,
The Administration has negotiated the fees for Amendment No, 16, and recommends the appropriation of
funding in the amount of $223,941, available from the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment
Funds.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1 $223,941,00 South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax
Increment Funds
Finance Dept. Total
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin
Carla Dixon, Ext 6264,
City Manager
1\
JMG v---- ".....
,
, ,
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
3C-
?-fl-o<j
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
http:\\miamibeachfl,gov
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM
To:
Chairman and Members of the
Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
Date: September8,2004
FROM: Jorge M, Gonzalez ~\ c /----
City Manager ',\.' U
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION (OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RA TYFYING AMENDMENT NO. 16 TO
AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND
CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. (CDM), DATED JULY 21, 1992, FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF
SEWER & WATER PUMPING STATIONS AND A NEW PUMPING STATION
ON MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES TO RE-DESIGN THE SOUTH POINTE WASTEWATER BOOSTER
PUMP STATION PROJECT; AND APPROPRIATING $223,941, AVAILABLE
FROM THE FROM SOUTH POINTE REDEVELOPMENT AREA TAX
INCREMENT FUNDS.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution.
FUNDING:
Funding forthis Project, in the amount of $223,941 , is available from the South Pointe RDA
Fund.
ANALYSIS:
On July 8, 1992, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution 92-20540, authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with the firm of Camp, Dresser and
McKee, Inc. (CDM), to provide architectural, engineering services for the upgrade of the
sewer and water pumping stations, and to design a new Water Booster Pump Station on the
Mac Arthur Causeway.
In the year 2000 Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City's Planning and Zoning
Department, it was determined that the existing pump station equipment had exceeded its
capacity, surpassed its useful life, was inefficient and presented additional operation and
maintenance costs without the construction of a new in-line booster station at South Pointe.
The alternative to providing a new South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station would
be major structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades at five (5) existing pump stations
downstream of Pump Station (PS) 28B (PS Nos. 1,10,11 ,28D, and 31). Consequently, the
South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project was identified as a priority, and the
Public Works Department recommended its construction.
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - CDM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 2
On January 31,2001, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24243, approving
Amendment No, 9 to its 1992 Agreement with Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc., (CDM) to
provide Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master
Booster Pump Station in South Pointe.
Project Limits:
The proposed pump station is to be located on Alton Road and 1 st Street. This triangular
property is bounded by the rights-of-way of Jefferson Avenue to the east, Alton Road to the
West, First Street to the north, and the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Alton Road at
Commerce Street to the south.
Project Scope:
Construction of 2-1500 HP Pumps with a 54-inch diameter force main, by-pass, FPL vault,
transformers, control room, emergency generator, fuel storage tanks, HV AC and ventilation
system, SCADA controls, architectural treatments, and landscaping.
On May 10, 2002, the City's Consultant, CDM submitted a Preliminary Design Report that
included two design alternatives for the proposed booster pump station, Option 1
(Attachment 1) which includes the configuration of all the components on-site arranged
within a one story glass and concrete enclosed structure; and Option 2 (Attachment 2) a
three-sided glass, one side concrete, two story facility with the pumps housed on the 1 st
floor, electrical room and generator on the 2nd floor.
Due to site constraints that included the existing 54-inch diameter force main which runs
diagonally to the property, and the triangular shaped site, CDM sought to provide vehicular
maintenance access, minimize utility relocation, simplify pipe runs, and curtail the size of the
structures while maintaining the facility aesthetics. CDM intended to lessen the impact on
the adjacent residential properties. The FPL vault, standby generator, fuel storage tanks
and other components vital for the pump station were originally to be located off site at the
nearby City owned Lot 15 Block 51 located at the intersection of Jefferson and 1 st Street. At
that time, the Residents, Planning and Public Works Departments concurred that Option 2
was the most feasible and CDM was authorized to proceed with its design development.
On January 9, 2003, CDM reported to the City that concurrent to the preparation of the thirty
Percent (30%) construction drawings, the CDM design team decided to incorporate the FPL
vault into the structure, as they were advised by the City of the unavailability of a remote site
to place this and other components, On January 14, 2003, the City immediately held a
meeting with CDM and their consulting architects-Zyscovich Architects, to discuss the
changes. During this meeting the City's consultant presented a revised site plan
incorporating the FPL vault into the structure. It became evident to the City that there was
significant modification to Option 2, and an increase in the building footprint.
The revised structure was taller, larger, and more massive than originally presented to the
Planning Department staff and residents, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement conditions.
The City directed its consultant to prepare conceptual elevations of the new structure(s)
reflecting the new building height, and massing. In addition, to schedule a meeting with the
Planning Department staff to review and evaluate those proposed changes prior to any
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - COM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 3
decision to proceed beyond the thirty percent (30%) design development level, and further
presenting the Project to the Design Review Board.
CDM was requested by the City to provide an updated engineer's estimate of probable
construction cost. On April 28, 2003, City staff met to discuss the increase from the $6.9
million dollars in the Preliminary Design Report of May, 2002, to a range of between $8.5 to
$11 million dollars in the engineer's estimate of probable cost dated April 9, 2003. Due to
the significant increase in the cost of the construction, CDM was requested to provide
documentation to support the cost increase, re-evaluate the building components, and
postpone further design development until the submittal and acceptance of an option that
would bring the project closer to the City's original construction budget.
CDM attributed the increase in the project cost to changes prompted primarily by the
unavailability of lot 15, Block 51. The pump station components were reconfigured on the
triangular site, the FPL sub-station type transformer placed within the building structure
versus pad mounted outdoor, relocation of the bypass force main, yard piping and
generator, changes in the HV AC design, on site location of the fuel tank, and demolition and
disposal of abandoned pile caps from the previous elevated water tank not reflected in the
topographic survey.
City staff and CDM explored several options to bring the project closer to its original budget,
including:
· The use of 2-1500 HP Pump Versus 3-900 HP Pump option. CDM advised that the
City would realize an immediate cost savings in excess of $200,000, by
implementing this change. The Public Works Department, after evaluation of
operations, maintenance and repair options agreed to the use of the 2-1500 HP
Pumps.
· Re-evaluation of the ownership, availability and use of Lot 15, Block 51, in an
attempt to offer more flexibility to the design team for the placement of the building
components. However, Planning Department staff did not approve of the use of a
prefabricated fuel tank and generator modular unit with landscape screening at this
prominent site. Staff later agreed to fit the modular unit within the triangular site, with
landscape screening. Although the modular unit will add to the already restricted
site, significant cost savings will of up to $900,000, will be realized as this reduces
the structural requirements of the Option 2 building.
On September 12, 2003, CDM requested additional compensation from the City in the
amount of $69,000, for providing supplemental out-of-scope services incurred as a result of
the change in the program. Re-design of the structure to add the transformer vault (at the
30% design submittal), reorganization of the site, structural components and piping layout,
and coordination during an extended contract term due to delays in the project originally
scheduled to be completed in the Fall of 2002. Of this amount, the City has only approved
$57,000 included in the Subtask C - Additional Services below.
In order to reduce the project cost by a significant amount, it will be necessary to re -design
the layout of the primary components originally approved in Option 2. The majority of the
thirty percent (30%) design documents already produced by CDM will be discarded, in order
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - COM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 4
to accommodate the components on site within a less massive structure, while maintaining
the construction budget. During the Amendment No. 16 negotiation process CDM, on the
behalf of Zyscovich Architects, requested additional Architectural Services fees in the
amount of $96,500. Of this amount, $35,000 was solely associated with the DRB
presentation and approval process,
Upon a review of the original Agreement, it was determined that CDM was obligated to
present the Project to the DRB until final acceptance, and therefore, the City could not
justify this portion of the fees. The parties could not arrive at an agreement with the existing
design team for both budgetary as well as time constraints, CDM proposed, and the City
agreed to the reorganization of the existing design team resulting in a more acceptable fee
for architectural treatments and the DRB presentation, CDM has selected ST A Architectural
Group for architectural design services on this Project. The original Additional Services fee
requested by CDM for the re-design work to the thirty percent (30%) level, including
Additional fees for the extended Contract term was $271, 176, the final amount resulting
from the negotiations is $223,941 as follows:
A. Architectural and Enqineerina Services
Task A.1
Subtotal CDM Labor.. ........... .., ... .., ...... ...... .........,............................,..,.... $ 93,525
Outside Professional Services:
Architectural.......................,..,.........,.......,........,...,...., ..........,......,......,.., $30,000
Landscaping..,.....,..,........,..,..,........,...........,..............,.."....,......,......... ..$ 2,500
Total Task A (Lump sum) ... ... ,.. ". '" '" '" .,. ....., ...". ... ... ,.,..".,,$126,025
B. Not Used
C. Additional Services - Permittinq/Biddinq Services
C,1 CDM Services (Upper Limit) .....,.....,..,........,..,..,..,..,..,...........,.........., ...$19,920
Outside Professional Services:
Architectural (DRB) ... '....,........, .........,..,....,.........,...........,.................. ..... ..$10,000
Landscape (DRB) .., ,."" '" ." ". ... .,. '" .,. ." ", ... ". ,.. ". ,'..,...."", '" '.. ... ,., '" .." ." $ 1 ,200
C.2 CDM Services (Upper Limit) ......................,........................................ $ 1,785
C.3 CDM Services (Lump Sum) ",... ... ... .,. ... .., ... ,.. ... ..,... ,..... ... ..,... '" '., ... ... .. $57.000
Total Task C (Upper Limit) ......'.. ,...""""",.....,....",..,......,... $89,905
D. Reimbursables
D.1 Design Services (Lump Sum) ................ ...... ...... ............... .................... $ 8,011
Total Task D (Lump Sum) .........................,.........................,$8.011
Total Amendment No 16 (Not-to-Exceed)......................... ....$223,941
The Agreement specifies that the completion of the design and advertisement for Bid shall
be within ten (10) months of the approval of Amendment No. 16 by the City Commission.
The project Advertisement for Bids, construction contract negotiations, and construction are
targeted to be completed concurrently with the on-line placement of the Pump Stations
Upgrades Project or shortly thereafter.
CDM's responsibilities under Amendment No. 16, (Attachment 3) for the Redesign of the
South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station will include, but are not limited to, Design
and Production of one hundred percent (100% )Contract Documents, providing all Permitting
Redevelopment Agency Memorandum - COM Amendment No. 16
September 8, 2004
Page 5
related services, DRB application, presentation and acceptance, Bidding Services.
The City has negotiated with CDM, fees for Amendment No. 16 in the amount of $223,941,
to provide Additional Architectural, Engineering and Landscape Architectural Services for
the re-design of the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Pump Station Project. The
Administration recommends the ratification of Amendment NO.16 by the Miami Beach
Redevelopment Agency, and appropriation of funding in that same amount available from
the South Pointe Redevelopment Area Tax Increment Funds.
Attachments
T:\AGENDA \2004\Sep0804\Consent\CDM AMENDMENT N0l6 RDA MEMO,doc
N
-: ;~
S ,~'....
ft' .'
...
~ [~O N
... - <> '<
~ ~~ -=' ~
!!i '"
g ~ ifl' ~
~~~fr
o I\) :;I:T
m l:l '"
~ or ~:J
8 >c po. f)
.: ~ ..
... '" '"
- ~ 8
.. 3
'" ;;
~ 2.
~ ~ '"
G.I 6" 0
2. =' c
cn~:7
m . '"0
.g. !to 0
'l1 ~ :r
5' t.n -
it ~ ~
m ~ 3
il'D
'"
it
~
0'
'"
o ~
"2. rg
0' ~
:) ...
... .0
N
o
<>
-
-,
..1
1
\ '~<:"f',"'--""'.';r---:-:-:--
\,-\.\.. r
,..( :
-----cr=,-A;,r -1,"~"\,
'" if'l -: 1
~~ 'I':i . ! i
~ i~ "
~ I r;" -._If.!.. . 1
-'.-l . f I
~~ ., I'
i'I ""\ i
.. :L;.....j )
I, I
\\ il'- ,:.
"V"
I .-
\ I l'
\' -"1[:
_ ,"\ fi '
<;:>\:Z~,
I 1
;'! ;'
,~., I
,U! '
\ \ '\
'. , i
.-\ \,',," \",,1
t..,O\' ~
$,j
i
8
.
.'
!
I: .
1 ; i~
'II, ill
I'll i~
t' .\ i/~. -,.,iW: ;
~ .11 I~ '.,'. '. J!' ~
'I '\1::-",/;;: I~
-'~~ \\j I I I
,- '. \, \ ).'
\ \'\ I ,
\ \..1.;
':'-) \.. ~
'<..
<?,.
"b\
"'\
\
"1 ' ,
.. {.,
, ,
i,'
1 ~ "
':.~
ll-
\
_..J
f
:t>'
rt
rt
III
(')
::r
3
CD
::s
rt
....
.2 1i!:l- N
or l!lw 8 'Oi
@ ~ro.J ~ n
g' ~ iii' ~
;C:~cr
~ '" :;]:::T
~ ~ Ql-
n _ !2::J
8m < n
. 0.,
-... '
A 0 "
w '" '"
...... i:.n -J
" 0
" 0
... 3
1(; Iii
~ 2
~ ~ C/J
tlI 6" 0
3 , c
CD ;tI :;
. 0.
~ Oa ~
:::r 'TI -.
'TI :; ::I
- " ~
~ ~ ~
'" " 3
!!.'D
'"
~
~
0'
'"
o ~
'tl lQ
.. C
o' !.
::J ...
'" .<>
N
o
~
E?f~yH+~~f',:,'..:'F!:~~; ,~,,'~~~~~~i:~, 1_..::':--~
"
m
I 1:/ ~
I ~
,<
'm
I z
'C
m
I
II'
Ii'
L-,-:-:- --~
'::-'--'__'~":' _fui.--u.--..------,
\ \~- '-c-~'",k-I >, - '1 -,
>\\~>~~~,~ ',,1.:' .::
<\\ i~! t" ' ! j
\ \ \\ -'; ~ 1 :
'," '\ I ' ,
. \ \ '. I"'
\ \\ \ l ,'I
". .. \\:~~'1' _, . '~1 (
\ \ \\'~,~-'i ,:n I
.: , ,"! "ill
\\ j ~ "
\, I!, "~ : I
.' \',t.;:-'-,:_:J II
\\ ~--' 1"\ i
\\ \,~ ;'1: j
... ,', "~I I
. \, ~R-'<>}I
\, "\~'\II
\ \ ,', "I
\:' \~, \d I
". \\ \1
\ \\'
\, ",.1
"",
, ,
"
$
,m
>>
i
~
m
z
c
m
<-- - ;i"
_ rt
,rt
III
()
:::r
';3
(1)
::l
rt
rv"
'~ ~ @ ~
N
, ~, ~
;(m ~ , 0 ~ :., N ::: t" .... z
"1 w '" 0 " !il
0 :;, "
:~ 0 ~ "1 "1 ~ ::i!
" ~ " .' " ~
C " ~
c 3 . " 0 0 q
3 n , ~ ~ n '" :., ;. ;.
~ n ~ ~ ~ ~
'" D ~ =J "1 ~ ~ ""
C '" ~ D ~ ~ ~ ,
z D ~ " !i1 ~ "1 ~ ~
2; . '" 0 ~ "
r '" c: c . 0 " c " " -<
< n 3 , c 3 0 0 0
. 2 n "' " . " 3 . n ~ ~ n
~ 0 ~ n ~
~ " '" ~ '" 2- ~
~ n '" "1 D ~
Ii i ,r D " '" "
" Z D
2. 0 r '" c: c . 0
0 < n ~ ,
" 3 0 2 '" . '"
0 ~ ~ 0 ~
0 '" ~
3 r D
r .
~ < "
"- 0
. 0
3
r----
::E
(])
U1
fT1
(])
<
o
o
::J
..,
o
c
,
0'
3
-~
'U
o
Q.
~
:1>
,
I!J 111'1111 I
. i m
1'1
,
z
f"lO
r- ;:u
,,-,--i
<I
~R>
o
z"'"
(f),,-,
(f)
--i
~I
o
l>
n C-
o o " 3 "
< g e , D
Z ~ S1 ' , c 3
0 ~ . ~fD 3 ;;
. ~ . ~ ~
0 ;;
~ m", '"
~ c- c c
::r 0 <
0 D g.g ~ n
~ . n
. D 0 D
III .
'l)
<
p
0
::J
>
c
'u 3
o _
-, ,
~~
a.
,-
<no
-c
C <
n 0
" ,
o ~
'!I'!WI ~ . -a", t -I I 11 .~
,,1...1. . 11 c 0 '"
,!i!l!j' ~ ~ 3 c !!if ita ,
~ " "O- j I ;c
il!!U'! : ~ ",:7 "
.y :!' --a - I ::l
~ !! .. 0 !I"
:",;11. 11 ~ n ' -
- -, ~ " tD
-, :s
11',.1 ~ ; g - " , .
1:;i!1 I . g
~
~f)
~ ~ ..." '"
" " C>
III 0; 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,;, ~ ~
i "! "! ~ 0
. , ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~
-0
; ." ~ '" '" " ~
~ 3 . 0 0 0
3 -0 ~ !!. !!. '0 ::l
-0 . C>
~ ~ ;; !!. !!. !!. '"
D D <[ "
." '"
~ C ~ . ~
-0 3 ~ 0
0 -0 -0 . -0
. ~ '" ;; 'l. l\l
~ " '" <[ -;;:., . . ,;,
~ ~ D ~ '" '" ~ ::
~ o~ ~ 0
~ '" 0 ~ ~ ~ . "
"- ~ 0 0 ~ <: <:
0 " ..
'" 3 " c . '" i:' i:' -<
0 c 3 ~ . .g
0 3 '0 D ~ !!. !!.
3 '0 ~ .
'" "-" !!.
'" -0 ~ !!.
0- 0- <[ -0
" '" 0
~ C ~ . ;;
'0 3 ~
D '0 '" -0 . !
. ~ ;;
~ ~ '" ~
~ ~ 0-
.
~ < " '"
"- ~ D
"- 0
'" 3
0
D
3
Vi
0
C
::T
rTl
0 rTl -0 ." -0
0 ~ 0
(fl n 3 ~
'l) 0 !:' 0
;;- ~
< "- . "- "-
0 , n ~ ~ ~
rTl D "- '" D '"
C '" [ ~
:f , c ~ "-
- 0 "-
<t> 0 0 3 ~ . ~
D 5 0: . D 0
< ;; ::>
0 ~
'"
0 . ,. ,.
0 " c
::> 3 3 '0
n 3 3 D
0 ~ c ~
"- 3 3
n ~ ~ "-
"- 0 '"
~ ~ ~ C-
3 ~ ~ g
0: . . D
~
Ip
1-
ii'J
'0
.11111111
; il;
Vl
...,0
,c
';!1
)>
='1<>
o
zr.,
VlJ>
V1
--<
I !ltill'l
1,1..,1.
!lil!!il
II!!I!'!
!"1:11.
11".1
li;l!1
f f
~, >>
II' "
g ~
~ ~'
. 00
~ ~
"IllJl
c 0
3 c
'O~
lJl::r
-"Il
01 0
S:a:
'"
il;1
'i,i
PI
I'
I
r*
.
-- L-'
8'<
" 0
~ i;
. -
. 0
~ ~
l.O ! aJ
. .
'?a
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC.
Amendment No. 16 for Professional Engineering
TO:
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 710
Miami, Florida 33131
DATE:
July 12, 2004
Pursuant to the Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
(Consultant) for Professional Engineering Services for the upgrading of Sewer and Water
Pumping Stations ("the Agreement"), you are directed to provide the following services:
Project Name: Preliminary Design Memorandum Update. Final Re-Design,
Preparation of Contract Plans and Specifications
Scope of Work:
Attached as Exhibit A
Calendar time to complete this work:
Fee for this Service Order:
Subtotal Task A (Lump Sum)
Subtotal Task C (Not-to-Exceed)
Subtotal Task D (Lump Sum)
Total Amendment No.16 (Not-to-Exceed)
10 months to Bid Advertisement
$ 126,025
$ 89,905
$ 8,011
$ 223,941
Basic Service X
Additional Service
X
Reimbursable Expense X
ACCEPTED:
City Clerk
9/t5"ft </
Victor J. Pujals, P.
Vice President
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
f4W r ttt-J,.,-
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
~~~ '}.-'-N'I
City Attorney (,- Date
N:\KM1495.PSA.doc
9/15/2004
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
PROJECT SCOPE AND BUDGET FOR SOUTH POINT W ASTEW A TER
BOOSTER STATION
PRELIMINARY DESIGN MEMORANDUM UPDATE, FINAL RE-DESIGN,
PREPARATION OF CONTRACT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AMENDMENT No, 16
July 12, 2004
PROJECT:
New Wastewater Booster Station Located at South Point on Miami Beach.
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the design of the Pump Stations Upgrades preliminary design in
1992-1993, the City and CDM concurred that the least disruptive and most
economically feasible option to meet the Level of Service for the wastewater
transmission system was to construct a single new booster pump station at the
downstream end of the wastewater transmission system in lieu of major
structural and electrical upgrades at six existing pump stations, This option
provided the benefits of greater operational flexibility for the City and lower
force main pressures throughout the entire system, resulting in decreased
operation and maintenance costs. CDM was authorized the original design
project work under Amendment No, 9,
The preliminary design report (PDR) was submitted on May 13, 2002, The
project was subsequently designed to the 30 percent level. However, the City
requested changes due to the magnitude of the estimated cost of construction,
This re-design amendment will include a letter report update to the preliminary
design memorandum and final design of an in-line, 98 MGD (peak), partially
underground, variable speed, two pump (one service, one standby) 1,500 HP
(approx.) wastewater booster station and 54-inch diameter station by-pass force
main located entirely on the former water tower site at First Street and Alton
Road. Project includes an electrical control room, instrumentation, and
generator/fuel tank on-site, SCADA interface, noise suppression, and
architectural and landscape features, This amendment revises the design and
permitting activities of the original scope. This bidding services and balance of
the reimbursable allowance will remain from the original contract.
PROJECT
REFERENCE:
Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser and McKee
Ine. (CDM) dated July 21, 1992, for professional engineering services for the
upgrading of sewer and water pumping stations,
SCOPE AND
BUDGET:
CDM will perform the additional work tasks described herein at the fees and
costs listed, Proposed labor hours are provided by task in the following pages,
This scope and budget supplements the scope and budget approved under
Page 1 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhAdoc
7113/2004
Amendment No, 9,
BACKGROUND
The City of Miami Beach (CITY) is approaching the construction of rehabilitation improvements
of its existing wastewater pumping stations (PS). The flows developed in the Year 2000
Comprehensive Plan prepared by the City of Miami Beach Planning and Zoning Department,
(October 1989) will exceed the capacity of the equipment installed in the Pump Stations
Upgrades construction project scheduled to start in May 2004 without the addition of a new in-
line booster station at South Point. It was analyzed previously that the required mechanical,
structural, and electrical renovations required for the PS Upgrades Project would have been cost
prohibitive and economically disruptive without the addition of a new in-line booster station on
the southern end of the wastewater transmission system. Further, the new pumps being
installed under the current Pump Stations Upgrades Project were designed specifically to work
in concert with the new booster station and will not operate properly without the station.
During the original design, the City proposed two valuable lots in the South Point area, to be
occupied by the utility facilities, During the design, the City, requested that the additional
property (lot 15) that was to be utilized for a remote electricalj generator building not be used,
This caused CDM to shift all of the components to fit them onto the water tower site. This
crowded site was further complicated by the required inclusion of a transformer the serve
facility vault per Florida Power & Light and the discovery of a system of wooden piles
remaining from the original water tank foundation. Prior to presentation of the Project to the
DRB, the City requested an updated estimate of Probable Cost. CDM's estimated construction
cost was significantly higher than the original "Design" budget established by the City in 1993,
At that point the city requested that CDM revise the architectural features and explore the
options to bring the Project back within the Budget. Changes to the Architectural Layout design
of the pump station became necessary causing significant delays and costs associated with CDM
adjusting its design to the new conditions, The deviation from the original design caused CDM
and its subcontractors to expend additional time and effort to reduce the project scope while
maintaining the functionality of the station (2 vs 3 pumps etc.) fitting the program into the water
tower site, The estimated costs of the revised pump station exceed the current design budget.
In addition, the Pump Station Upgrades Project is anticipated to be under construction in the
second quarter of 2004, CDM and members of the City CIP, Public Works, and Planning staff
met on February 4, 2004 to agree on a scaled down design, This design would keep most of the
original elements while reducing the project costs and maintaining all the facilities on the water
tank site.
For these reasons, the CITY has asked CDM to provide a scope and budget (described below) to
revise the design of the required booster station and allow for compensation for the additional
design effort.
Page 2 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc
7/1312004
A. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A&E) (Amended)
A.l Design Services and Production of Contract Documents
1. Preparation of a letter report updating to the design memorandum with applicable
sketches and renderings for the booster station, including landscape drawings,
presenting the new layout option, and preliminary opinion of probable cost.
2, Preparation of EJCDC-based specifications and approximately 70 contract drawings,
per the sheet list provided in Appendix A, describing the design and construction of
the new booster station,
3, Preparation of an opinion of probable construction cost at the 60 and 90 Percent
Completion Review, Perform a constructability reviews, and phasing/ scheduling
plan to coordinate the work with the on-going Pump Station Upgrades construction
project at the 90 Percent completion point.
4, Three coordination meeting with CITY Planners and coordinating with other
projects in the area. Requested revisions to the design following the submittal and
acceptance of the 60% construction documents by the City, if any, will constitute
additional services.
5, Attendance at monthly (up to 10) progress meetings with the CITY during the course
of the design phase of this project.
Site Survey and Geotechnical subsurface investigations of the project site have been completed,
Deliverable will be three sets (1 reproducible) of plans and one diskette of specifications in MS
Word format 1 diskette containing AutoCAD plot file (Version 2000 or latest) for CMB
procurement to produce and distribute as Owner, CMB will provide CDM three copies of the
bid set, all addenda, and six copies of the executed contract documents.
The total authorization fee for Task A Items 1 through 5 is a lump sum (LS) amount of $126,025,
This amount excludes Reimbursables (listed later in item D),
Design Services (Lump Sum)
Subtotal CDM Labor
Outside Professional Service
Architectural
Landscaping
Total Task A (LS)
Amount
$93,525
$30,000
$2,500
$126,025
Page 3 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc
711312004
B. NOT USED
C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES (AMENDED)
C1 Provide additional permitting services related to Building Department, Fire Rescue,
DERM and FDEP, Additional hours have been included for potential coordination
with MDW ASD in the relocation and re-design of the forcemain under Government
cut to Virginia Key, Through an architectural subcontractor, CDM will prepare and
submit a DRB application and presentation, This submittal includes preparation and
submittal of the application form, mailing to potential affected parties, and
presentation to the Board. All permit fees shall be paid by the City,
C2 Provide bidding services in accordance with the original scope of work. The upper
limit of this task represents the difference in the hourly rates from the original date of
the scope of work (2000) to the date of this scope of work (2004).
C3 Provide supplemental services incurred as a result of the change in program, due to
the addition of the FP&L transformer vault, reduction in the total buildable space,
and delays in the project schedule,
The total authorization for Task C is an Upper Limit (UL) of $89,905.
Task Permitting/Bidding Services
C.1 CDM Services (UL)
Outside Professional Servo
Architectural (DRB)
Landscape
C.2 CDM Services (UL)
C.3 CDM Services (LS)
Total Task C (UL)
D. REIMBURSABLES
Amount
$19,920
$10,000
$1,200
$1,785
$57,000
$89,905
The total additional authorization for Task D is a Lump Sum (LS) of $8,011, The
reimbursable budget for the various tasks are as follows:
Reimbursable
D,l
Design Services (LS)
Total Task D (LS)
ASSUMPTIONS
Amount
$8,011
$8,011
1. There will be no setback requirements of the pump station or other structure at the site
with respect to the property line,
Page 4 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc
7/13/2004
2, The generator/ fuel tank will be skid mounted and located on the ground, outside of
the building floor, The electrical MCC room will be on the second floor above the FPL
vault, per CDM's design proposed concept.
3, The original architectural design concept (glass facade storefront system) is acceptable
4, There will need to be a new DRB application prepared and presented,
5. We have budgeted three meetings with Planning/ other interested parties
6. We will assume any meetings with MDWASD to coordinate the new transmission line
will be covered under the Additional Services in Task C.l of this Amendment.
7. We assume that the previous DRB process activities and costs ($10,000) will be covered
under the original permitting task (C.l) scope and budget of Amendment No, 9.
DATA OR ASSIT ANCE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY
1, Locations of all existing underground, on-site utilities including as-built drawings and
results of any soft-digs in the area of the proposed improvements,
2. Existing related project drawings, including record drawings of existing facilities not
already available to CDM.
3. Assistance in discussions with regulatory agencies and City boards,
4. Submittal of documents to the various City departments for review prior to bidding,
SCHEDULE
Due to the need to complete this project in order that it can be bid or negotiated, constructed
and placed on-line prior to or in conjunction with the completion of the Pump Stations
Upgrades project assuming reasonable durations for the departmental and board reviews, etc.,
the following schedule outline is proposed:
Milestone
Time to Complete
(as measured from NTP)
o months
1 months
2 months
4 months
8 months
10 months
Notice to Proceed
Revised Preliminary Design Memorandum
30% Design Review Submittal
60% Design Review Submittal
90% Contract Documents,
100% Contract Documents Advertise for Bid
Page 5 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhA.dOC
7(1312004
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION
Total Amendment No, 16 compensation for CDM services will be as follows:
Task Amount
A $126,025
B
C $ 89,905
D $ 8,011
$223,941
This amendment is for additional services under Tasks A, C, and D in the amount of $223,941,
The original Amendment No.9 dated March 15, 2001associated with this project was for a total
compensation amount of $488,205, Amendment No, 9 included Tasks Al (Design), Cl
(Permitting), C2 (Bidding), and D (Reimbursables). The increase to tasks A, C and D will result
in a total not-to-exceed amount of $712,146 for this project.
CDM shall submit monthly invoices to the City. Each invoice shall include a monthly written
status report. Invoicing for the lump sum, Task A, Task C3 and D,I will be based on the
percentage of completion of the task. Invoicing for the not-to-exceed services, Tasks Cl, C2,
and D2, shall be billed on a time and materials basis at CDM's prevailing rates, Exhibit B.
Page 6 of 6
N:\KM1495.ExhA.doc
7/13/2004
CDM's SOUTH POINT BPS FEE PROPOSAL
A. DESIGN SERVICES
CDM Labor Hours
CDM Labor Services
Outside Professional Services:
Survey
Geotechnical
Architectural
Landscaping
Payment Summary
Original Task A
Paid To Date
Remaining Funds
Additional Funding
New Task A Cost to Complete
Credit for Remaining Funds
Additional Authorization
Total Task A Authorization
Initial Task A Authorization
Additional Redesign Authorization
Total Design Task A
C. PERMITTING AND BIDDING SERVICES
CDM Labor Hours (C.l and C.2)
CDM Labor Services (C.l)
Outside Professional Services
Architecture (New DRB)
Landscaping (New DRB)
CDM Labor Services (C.2)
Out of Scope Services (C.3)
Payment Summary
Original Task C.l and C.2
Paid to Date
Remaining Funds
(July 12, 2004)
Original
3,690 hrs
$346,860
$8,500
$3,500
$45,000
$0
$403,860
Original
644 hrs
$31,840
$34,715
$66,555
Page 1 of2
Costs to Complete
2,934 hrs
$286,615
$0
$0
$ 61,500
$ 2,500
$350,615
$403,860
$179,270
$224,590
$ 350,615
($224,590)
$ 126,025
$403,860
$126,025
$529,885
Cost to Complete
500 hrs
$47,155
$10,000
$ 1,200
$36,500
$57,000
$151,855
$66,555
$ 4,605
$61,950
N:\KM1495.Tbl.doc
7/1312004
~
Additional Funding
New Tasks C1 to C3
Credit for Remaining Funds
Additional Authorization
Total Authorization
Initial Task C Authorization
Additional Authorization
Total Permitting/Bidding Task C1
D. REIMBURSABLES
Original
Subtotal (D.1)
Subtotal (D.2)
$16,252
$ 1,538
$17,790
Payment Summary:
Original Task 0.1, D.2
Paid to Date
Remaining
Additional Funding:
New Task D
Credit for Remaining Funds
Additional Authorization
Total Task D Authorization:
Initial Task D Authorization
Additional Reimbursables
Total Reimbursables Task D
SUMMARY OF COMPENSA nON
Task Amendment No, 9 Amendment 16
A $403,860 $126,025
B
C $66,555 $89,905
D $17,790 $8,011
$488,205 $223,941
Page 2 of 2
$151,855
$(61,950)
$ 89,905
$ 66,555
$ 89,905
$156,460
Cost to Complete
$17,952
$ 1,538
$19,490
$17,790
$ 6,311
$11,479
$19,490
$(11,479)
$ 8,011
$17,790
$ 8,011
$25,801
Total
$529,885
$156,460
$25,801
$712,146
N:\KM1495. Tbl.doc
7/13/2004
l'
APPENDIX A
LIST OF DRAWINGS (6/25/04)
SOUTH POINT WASTEWATER BOOSTER PUMP STATION
SHEET No.
TITLE
GENERAL
G-O
G-I
G-2
Cover
Index and Legend
Abbreviations
CIVIL
C-I
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
Site Survey
Site Demolition Plan
Underground Demolition Plan
Plot/Soil Borings Plan
Grading Plan
Yard Piping Plan
CD-I
CD-2
CD-3
Miscellaneous Civil Details
Miscellaneous Civil Details
Paving and Grading Miscellaneous Details
ARCHITECTURAL
A-I
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
ArchitecturalfSheet Index, Abbreviation and Symbols
Pump Station Floor Plan
Pump Station Floor Plan
Pump Station Floor Plan
Pump Station Elevation
Pump Station Elevation
Pump Station Schedules and Details
Pump Station Schedules and Details
LANDSCAPING
L-I
L-2
L-3
L-4
Landscape Plan
Landscape Specifications
Irrigation Plan
Irrigation Specifications
COM
A-1
N:IKM1495,xls
7/9/2004
,
SHEET No.
STRUCTURAL
S-l
S-2
S-3
S-4
5-5
5-6
SD-1
SD-2
MECHANICAL
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
M-6
MD-l
MD-2
MD-3
HVAC
H-1
H-2
H-3
H-4
PLUMBING
P-l
P-2
P-3
CDM
TITLE
Structural Notes and Abbreviations
Pile Foundation Plan and Details
Intermediate Level Plan and Sections
Roof Plan and Details
Elevations and Details
Schedules and Details
Structural Details
Structural Details
Booster Pump Station - Pump Room Plan
Booster Pump Station - Motor Room Plan
Booster Pump Station - Sections
Booster Pump Station - Sections
Fuel Storage Tank, Schematic and Details
Meter and Valve Pit Details
Miscellaneous Mechanical Details
Pipe Hangers and Supports
HV AC Symbols and Abbreviations
Pump Station HV AC Floor Plan
Electrical Room HV AC Floor Plan
HV AC Schedules and Details
Plumbing Symbols and Abbreviations
Pump Station Plumbing Floor Plan
Plumbing Risers, Schedules and Details
A-2
N:IKM1495,xls
719/2004
SHEET No.
ELECTRICAL
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-IO
E-ll
E-12
E-13
E-14
INSTRUMENTATION
I-I
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
1-7
1-8
1-9
CDM
TITLE
Electrical Symbols and Abbreviations
Electrical Site Plan
4160 Volt Single Line Power Diagram
480 Volt Single Line Power Diagram
Elementary and Generator Control Diagrams
Instrumentation, Control and Instrumentation Upper Plan
Equipment Elevations
Pump Station Power, Control and Instrumentation Upper Plan
Pump Station Lighting Upper Plan
Pump Station Power, Control and Instrumentation Lower Plan
Pump Station Lighting Lower Plan
Fuel Storage Tank and Generator Plans
Lighting Fixtures and Panel Schedules
Electrical Details
Instrumentation Legend Sheet
Instrumentation Block Diagram
Instrumentation P&ID
Instrumentation Loops
Instrumentation Loops
Instrumentation Loops
Instrumentation Loops
Instrumentation Loops
Instrumentation Details
A-3
N:IKM1495,xls
7/9/2004
CONI
EXHIBIT B
caw
SCHEDUL.E OF HOURLY BIL.L.ING RATES
COST GROUP II
CATEGORIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
OFFICER
PRINCIPAL. I ASSOCIATE
SENIOR PROFESSIONAL.
PROFESSIONAL. "
PROFESSIONAL. I
PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES
SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES
STAFF SUPPORT SERVICES
FIELD SERVICES
SENIOR PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL
PROJECT SUPPORT SERVICES
PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
HOURL. Y
RATES
$ 1 SO.Oo
$ 140.00
$ 120.00
$ 105.00
$ 90.00
$ 90.00
S 75.00
$ 80.00
$ 8S.00
$ 65.00
All subconsultant and other project related u:penses arB
subject to a minimum hancling/administratill8 charge of 1 0%.
CERTIFIED BY:
RATES EFFECTIVE THROUGH JANUARY 1,2005
e!
~
~
(,)
0
z <:l
0 ...
~ (,)
I- ~
Ul
ll: ~ "
W (,) 0
I- 0
Ul 15 i:!
0
0 O!: ;:::
lD 0
Ul ll: ;::
I- ~ (,)
Z =>
W ~ 8
:r:! W
UW l- ll:
<C!!: ~
W::l ~
lXIa
-w I- <(
~ll: z ~
:;;g; 0 ~
"'0 ll.
n o:r :I:
I-
~~ ::l ,
0 ..
u:! Ul .c
0 0 0 '" 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 "',
N '" '" .... '" 0 '" '" 0 '" <l N,
ll(',cn '" " '" '" 0 '" '" '" 0 "1
'" <5 N " oj N '" .; M N .; ,,;
Oii .. '" '" ;;; ;;; "' '" '" ;;; '" ;;; ;;;
3" .. .. .. .. .. ..
{~ "' 0 '" 0 '" "' " ; '" 0 '" .;
<0 '"
....,.., .... ;;; " " "' '" 0 .... ~ ~ ;! "'
0.'0 '" ~ - '" " '" ~ ...~
~-:~
,~
il~ c. Q
" 0 "' 0 0 "' "' 0 0 " 0 " Q
~-:ii '" .. oi
,-::~ :;;
,~
..';:.0:: 0 0 r<i. a
~',o ~ "' '" 0 0 "' 0 0 " 0 0
,~ .... '" " '" ;! :::' '" '" N N ~
"":.0; "1'
~.'::J
....en
~] Q
0', " "' N "' "' 0 "' 0 0 0 " ;! ..' Q
~::~ "' '" N N " " "' ~
~
~
u..... " 0 "' "' 00, 8
~::~ 0 :: - "' "' '" N '" "' 0 "' "' "', g
~
u:,.... 0 "' ;; 8
0....;. 0 " "' "' "' "' 0 0 N
0::.":- '" a; " " '" 0 N " N " N " ~
CL.... N - ..
h .. a
0 "' '" 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0
'" .... " " ~ "' "' " "' "' '" '" 0, ~
"'
~:~ a
lI....~ .... " '" '" "' "' I~ Q
~:.~ " - ~ co N '" ~ " " "' " ~ ~
~'
~',
:::~ 0
....0 " ~ "' 0 ;! '" 0
"' 0 " " " " " ~
:::'~ '"', ~
.:.:C?
z
a
f=
"
z
15
0:
a
a
u
I-
- Z
" w
.c :>
w
" 0:
:-:2: a - " " ~
.Q " U ~ ~
-:',0 u ~ a '"
...~ 0 " 0: . '5 =
;;
TI "- . ~.
~ 0
::1'5 '~ OJ 0: 1! c'
'" :> ro
","II) " 0 () " i
","&I '" TI '" E 0;
:.:0 0 ~ m Q
,9 l .
':'~ " 0'2 :> u " .'
0: 2
:! -0 g a "@ 0 1;
:-.~ 1J 0 " ~ ~ ..,
I~ 0 .. 0 0 D-
,',0 ~ U () ~
.".>( " ~I~ in " :~
,... -6 1! ~ " '" "' " ~
0 "
m m " " 0 TI 0 f- -'i 0
0 I~ s . co .~ z
E m 0 ;; W a 5 Q
'~I:;; is ;; ~ Z m :> 'S ;; "
. " a is ::0 TI C
:> ~Ig " ro
" is " ~~ () . a &
,~ 0 - a TI Q
0 ;; '" " t
" a m ~ ;; ~ ~(2 0 "' 0 "-
. is " m " I- oi
0 () " l' TI
CJ ~ " u ~~ u m
~ z z 0 0
0 " il' " ~ m
ii5 - " in ::Ou 0: 0 i"
I- () "
0; ~ I U :> () 0:" I- a ~ 21
~ ;,; '> () " " w 1-0: Z w
W > ~ ~ "'I- a ;,; " ;; "
~ 0 U :> I "- W ""' U .
0 0 . ~
"- OJ U 0 :> ~
~ N ..; " "' OJ
u
',~
.:5:;:
"'
>I
~
~
~
"'
"'
~
oi
"'
m
~
~
~
Q
~
Q
~
'"
"'
"'
~
'"
"'
S'
~
~
"'
~
"'
'"
....
g
~
g
~ ;i\ '" 00 0 "'
'" 00 0 N
'" '" 0'" "' 0
N M OON N ,,;
'" '"' '" :!
.. .... ..
" a: ;::-
(J) 0 ..:
a: S
::0 :>
a w
I ::;; !;
a: Cl
a () w
OJ ~
5 ~
::;; ;0
Cl
() a
I-
"
a:
::0
"
f
2
"
S
.
8
ft
~
::!::
~
z !!!
0 ..,
~ ..,
<C
I-' ~
Ul ~
0::
W I::
I-' ~
Vl
0 ffi
0
al Go
Ul 0:: e
W
I-' !;c
Z
W := s:
:t::IE w ffi
~~ I-'
~ ..,
w- ....
al5 := ~
~~ I-'
Z 0
-0:: 0 i:
:IE:::! 0.. CS
...0 :t: Cl
I O:t: I-' <C
~~ :::! ,
0 ...
u:IE Vl ti
0 '0
N '"
.Ii::: 0: en en
en ,.$
'0, .. ;; ~
.~ .. ...
0,
:u.
3 '..'
'", '" :g
':>' 0
'0 .It. N :~
:~
.ct:"
'~ .~. c
'0 .. 0 c
'", '" ..' cj
:a:- l '"
...
'..'
..' "' c
.~. 0' ~ '0 c
., cj
:t): .. ~
:> ...
.....0.
n ~ '" g
,~ :2
...
U;: g
0, ~ '" ~
"', g
'~.'. ...
.~. C
0 Q c
cj
"' '" .. C
0.." ;:;
"Ill:: ., c
'0, Co
:Z. 0' 0 ~ C
",' '"
,..' PO: "
,..' ;:;
~..~. g
~i
' , ~ '0 c
:~. ~
"Q:'" ;:;
"l:l;.:' :
:<<0::' g
,".W
<.:-Y. .. :..,. ,,;
<l ~
...
Q
(/)
<(
;::
Q
....Z. ::;; ~
.,..0 5
....J;; '"
'~ ..
>5 '" 1-.
~
0
....11) '~ .'Iii.
....w '" :~
....0 ~
u
:-:'0 '" J!
..'..z Ci
',',00; 1-i.1 0
I-
..'..lI!. ~ ,J)
....~. E ,:>
'E -'P.
13
a.
E
13 ~
Q
ro ~
~ C!J
~ ;;;
'6 ...
~ ill
H
E~
.~
...
u
'"
~
~
~
~
~
o
o
.,
N
o
'"
..
..
o
'"
'"
..
o
.,
'"
..
o
'"
'"
.;
o
o
'"
.;
'"
0 .E
.,
:J
13
"-
"-
.. 2-
0 '" 0 0 00
N 0 N 0 NN
'" N en "! --
en :: --
"'...
.. .. .. ..
" 00
en Li 00 Li
a: ON
::J ::;; ci~ E
0 w ~
I S ro
a:
0 a: (5
<II 0 .. .. I-
:5 III
::;; :5 ~~~~
Q ::;; <( .- rl a.
() Q ZBrhO
() O::)'O..J
(j)U)~<(
Wa:J-l I-
W cr:: CD 0
u.. Q cr:: I-
~ 0 ~
0. en
W
Q
iii
I-
::J
0
~
'"
J!!
~
.8
"
i;- n
..
8
~
z :l!:
0 ~
li !!!
to' C/)
VI C/)
ll: <t
~ ~
~
VI Q
0 5!
0
lD !Xl
VI ll: C/)
W
to' !;( ~
Z
W 3: SO
:1::;; ~ ffi
OW
cell: !Ii C/)
w- .....
lD5 3: ~
~~ to'
Z 0
-ll: a j:::
:;;:) D- es
...0 :I: Q
I 0; to' <t
~~ :) ....
0
0:;; VI 0
'" '"
<Xl ..
"0::>0: ....- :t:.
;,;; ~
0....... ..
l"
. .'C.
:.:t?
:I ",
0:, 0 .~
>0, " N
0 .~
>0
ci:
'~ .~. c
0 ~ N C
0: :~. g
:~. ~' ..
,;
,.. 0: C
.~..~. 0 ~ c
:tr:~ i2
.....0. ..
:Qd~ c
~..l[, 0 '" c
.;
)(~: '"
..
'.. c
'0 ~' 0 ~ C
'0: 0
'", '"
..
'1>..~. c
.0 c
0 0
'0:, C
"G;. ;:;
ci: ,..' c
'0 c
:z 0' '" :.". 0
,0:'
,OJ !I-: ~
,., ..
t~ 8
~.,~, 0 ,0 0
;':
"It:. . ..
~.' .
-:-:ai:- 8
,W'
,':-.U' '" .'" .;
<l "'
;:;
0
<JJ
<l:
:;:
.;z:: 0
::;: ~
'0' E
1': ..'
'~ '"
';;: .. F.-:
c
'.,u 0
'tfl '~ ..
'W' .. 'm,
",-:0 ~ 0
u
>:-0 .. ;;
..~ is G
Ig 1-.
'.,"'. ;0
....(1). "' "
....~. 'E :tp.
~
a.
E
~ i!!
0
;; ~
c '"
g ;,;
'C -'
~ ""
Ol
1;;8
~~
c_
g;;::
'"
N
U
..
.
~
~
m
.
i
~
C
N
~
..
..
..
o
o
"'
'E
~
~
c.
c.
2-
'" 0 '" '" '"
"' N <Xl a) ..
.. ....- ....- to-_
'" .. ..
" N
<JJ r,j
c:r: r,j
::> ::;: E
0 w ~
l: !::. ;;
c:r:
0 c:r: ~
<II 0
:S <II
::;: :S
0 ::;:
u 0
u
~
'"
...
~
2
'"
i;-
t;
8
n
z
0
~
I- !
III
0::
W
I-
III
0
0 ~
III
0::
~ W S
z !;c Ili
W s: lJ)
:1::;; W ....
OW I- ~
<(0:: ~
W- ~
III 5 s:
-w I-
~o:: Z
-0:: 0 ~
:;;::J
...0 Q. g;
:I:
n 0:; l- ll)
~~ ::J l")
0
(3:;; III ti
0 0 0 ..
... ... ... N
'il::: ... '" "- ,aT
Ul, en ,.: ,,; ..
'0, .., N .. .. "
:l Ul, .. ...
0,
u,
:~ ..
"', N 0; N ...
'", ::l, '" <<l'
0 :~ N '" ~:
>;
:ar:
,., .~. ... 8
'0 .. "- ~
,"' !l ... ... ..:;TI: "
:~ ~
...
~,
,"' "', 8
'~ 0' 0 ~ :0.
,..' N 0 ,~ ~
:t) ..'
::l' ...
.....lI).
.~. '..
'", 8
,g. 0 ~ 0 0 '",
.~ .. :~- "'
..' ro
::l, ...
:VJ.
'" 8
-0, ~ <Xl 0 0 :~
,"' "
.CL:..... ro
.,
~. .. .. ~ <:> 8
'"" - <Xl N ~, g
"Q;.," ~, :;;
U c
0 ~ 0 <> c
~ N ,., "
,- ~
...
t~ 8
:~r: : 0 0 <Xl :D?- "
;':
ii2> . .,
:Il:.." .
:0:- 8
,W' 'ID
.S=!: '" ... ... "'
:':-:1::' :.-:-" '"
,'.:-p :;;
"~ '(h
'...
::::1;:: ...
.'"
I-
.'-:~: ;~
u' "
If) 0 !
w 'iZ
-:-:0
:':-0 Q, :1i
"
-:-:.z. " 'C;
',',< " I-
::::"': c
" ~ .:rJ:
>~ X ~ ,",
UJ ~
..
,S c
~ <(
'" c
,~ c ,2 i!!
13
~ .Q => ~
" 1ii "
"
" c " "
0: ~ 0: 1':
.!l 0 u; ~
0 0 '"
iii u u '"
~~
:J~
~;:
~
~
Q
~
~
C
N
'"
,,;
c
'"
oj
..
c
~
'"
o
"
'"
..
0
c
q
..
c
"
"
~
" i'
~ E ::J
III
:J Q.
~ :IE
c. ::J
c.
2- d-
o '" .. 0 C> 0
'" <Xl N 0 N 0
" '" '" '" C>
oj N i- ,.: 0
... "' ,.:
It)
.. .. ... .. ~
" 0 '"
Vl <.i 0 <.i
0: '"
::> :2 .; E
0 UJ ~ I}
:I: ~ 1ii
0: W
0 0: 0
:5 0 0- III
al .. ::J
~ Vl _HI)
:2 <la
0 :2
U 0 Z::>O
u Qt;~
VlUJo-
ffi!::o
LL:I:t-
oum
0:0:::>
Q,<((I)
UJ
'"
Ui
0-
::>
0
1:-
e
'"
..,
~
a
.0
..,
11 n
~
8
COM
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT COSTS
SOUTH POINT WASTEWATER BOOSTER STATION
D.1-REIMBURSABLES (DESIGN SERVICES)
12-Jul-04
OTHER [)IR(;:(;T c:O~TS
....................
........,.........
..............,..
........'......
.............
Travel
Airfare IRIT)
Meals
ParkinQ
Car
Plans and Scecifications
Preliminarv
Draft Final
Reoroducibles and Final CD
Comouter Charoes: Data Assembly, ModelinQ, CAD
T eleohone/OmnlfaxlDelivery/Courner/Post
Miscellaneous Supplies, Aerials/Maps, Oversize Printing
Consueio M, Quintana
URG
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COSTS (ITEM 0,1)
CDM
",',',',',',',"."'.~U~l1tity<<!lnl~" <<<~t~ <>C()9t<>'
6
11
29
4
4
4
o
296
25
9
ea (lj)
oerday
car-days
per day
ea I
ea I
ea 0
hrs
ea II
ea II
ea@
ea@
$ 300,00 $
$ 21,00 $
$ 6,00 $
$ 45,00 $
$ 115,00 $
$ 125,00 $
$ 150,00 $
$ 6,00 $
$ 35,00 $
$ 35,00 $
$ 1,500,00 $
$ 200,00 $
Total
1,800.00
231.00
174,00
180,00
460,00
500.00
1,776,00
875,00
315,00
1,500,00
200,00
$
8,011
KM1495 T8LXLS dn_odes
7112/2004