Loading...
92-2787 ORD ORDINANCE NO. 92-2787 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 789, BEING THE CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES SALARY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A 1% SALARY INCREASE TO THOSE CLASSIFICATIONS COVERED BY THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the following lines in Section 1 of Ordinance No. 789 as heretofore amended, which reads as follows: GROUP II FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE JOB CLASSIFICATION JOB CLASS NO. BI-WEEKLY COMPENSATION MINIMUM MAXIMUM DETENTION OFFICER I. D. OFFICER LIEUTENANT OF POLICE POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE SERGEANT OF POLICE 5305 5012 5009 5011 8001 5010 787.13 1058.29 1642.78 1058.29 1008.31 1489.48 968.09 1419.21 1901. 51 1419.21 1419.21 1642.78 shall be amended to read as follows: JOB CLASSIFICATION JOB CLASS NO. BI-WEEKLY COMPENSATION MINIMUM MAXIMUM DETENTION OFFICER 1. D. OFFICER LIEUTENANT OF POLICE POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE SERGEANT OF POLICE 5305 5012 5009 5011 8001 5010 795.00 1068.87 1659.21 1068.87 1018.39 1504.37 977.77 1433.40 1920.53 1433.40 1433.40 1659.21 SECTION 2: The Bi-Week1y compensation set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactive to October 1, 1990. SECTION 3: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4: This emergency ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this , 1992. ATTEST: Passed and Adopted as an Emergency Measure - 7/22/92 FORM APPROVED B~ Date ~~/YL ,.c~Ju:i, e. ~duJj() '1 ~~, Xr/Jlm/1#;i CITY CLERK I ~v v 7 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH r:::' (HALL 1700 COIJ'/EIJTlOIJ CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH FLnRIDA 13 I J'l OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TELEPHONE: (305) 673-7010 FAX: (305) 673-7782 COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 459-9:& TO: Mayor Seymour Gelber and Members of the City Commission DATE: July 22, 1992 FROM ~~~:~;:~<<.6le.. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO RATIFY A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE #8, AND THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS, LOCAL 1510, AND THE EMERGENCY PASSAGE AND ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCES GRANTING THE WAGE INCREASES AS PROVIDED IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the attached resolution to ratify the Settlement Agreement between the city of Miami Beach, the Fraternal Order of Police, (FOP) Lodge #8, and the International Association of Firefighters, (IAFF) Local 1510. Further, the Administration recommends emergency adoption of the ordinances to grant the wage increases to the FOP and IAFF membership, as provided in the Settlement Agreement. BACKGROUND: The Administration has been negotiating for approximately 18 months with the FOP and the IAFF regarding a wage increase re-opener that was due in October 1990, under the current labor agreements for these two bargaining units. At a culmination meeting held on May 26, 1996, the decision by the FOP and IAFF Presidents was to take the Settlement Agreement proposed by the City to their membership for a vote. The membership of the FOP and the IAFF rejected the proposed Settlement Agreement. The attached is a revised Settlement Agreement reached after continued, intense negotiations. ANALYSIS: The revised Settlement Agreement provides for active full-time bargaining unit employees, a 1.5% lump sum payment, calculated on base wages earned for the period of 10/01/90 to 09/30/91. For the lump sum payment, there will be no fringe benefit add-ons. Further, active, full-time bargaining unit employees will receive a retroactive 1% across-the-board increase effective as of 10/1/90, which shall be considered to be an increase to these units I employees for purposes of base benefit calculations. continued. . . 1 AGENOA lTEH OATE 7~2-2-qv COMMISSION MEMORANDUM PAGE 2 FOP/IAFF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JULY 22, 1992 The revised Settlement Agreement also provides bargaining units' retirees, who retired between 10/1/90 and the ratification of the Agreement, a one-time, lump sum, non-pensionable, payment of 1.5t on annual salary only, excluding overtime, etc. for fiscal year 1990/91. Also, effective 10/1/90, retired officers will be provided with a retroactive 1% across-the-board increase in their base pay for all purposes. These payments shall be pro-rated for the days actually worked during fiscal years 1990/91 and 1991/92. Pursuant to the direction of the City Commission, upon ratification 'of the attached Settlement Agreement, the FOP and the IAFF will commence negotiations for fiscal years 1992/93, 1993/94, and 1994/95. As reported to you in the Letter to Commission No. 140-92, dated May 28, 1992, the cost and the method of funding for this Settlement Agreement would be as follows: The cost estimate for the proposed wage settlement with the FOP and the IAFF bargaining units is $700,000. This amount includes the $200,000 cost for the current year, as well as the $500,000 cost for the prior year. The direction of the City Commission vas to offset the costs vith savings during the current year. Based on the direction of the City Commission, the Fire Department will pay its share, $280,000.00, from existing salary savings due to leaving positions vacant. The Police Department's share, $420,000.00, has been achieved through reductions in overtime utilization recently reviewed by the Finance Committee, and keeping vacant certain management, sworn, and civilian positions, as well as restrictions on discretionary operating expenditures. These actions will result in savings this year of approximately $400,000. The only difference between the previously proposed Settlement Agreement and the revised Settlement Agreement that was accepted by the FOP and the IAFF is that the 1% increase to the base rate is pensionable. Because of the way that the pension is funded, there is no pension cost this year for the 1t. The Pension Board's actuary has revised the one-time assumptions for the future, based on approximately five years experience, which results in a wash for future years. CONCLUSION: The approval of this Settlement Agreement is recommended. It is the opinion of the City Administration that a negotiated settlement is preferable over an imposed settlement, which would be the outcome of the special Master process. RMC: DRM: 19 Attachments .:COMM-MEMO&1l0 FOp../AFF AGfI ., ... ~