Loading...
980 West 48th StreetMIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7550, Fax: 305-673-7559 March 2, 2006 Ms. Sylvia Fox 9050 Iron Horse Lane, #211 Pikesville, Maryland 21208 Re: 980 West 48th Street, Miami Beach Request for a Determination of Architectural Significance Dear Ms. Fox: Pursuant to your request that was completed on February 10, 2006 (see Attachment), the Planning Department has evaluated the subject property at 980 West 48th Street to determine whether the single-family residence is architecturally significant. A site visit of the subject property was conducted by staff on February 23, 2006. In accordance with Section 142-108(1) of the Land Development Regulations of the Miami Beach City Code, the following criteria determine whether a home constructed prior to 1942 is architecturally significant: , The subject structure is characteristic of a specific architectural style constructed in the city prior to 1942, including, but not limited to, Vernacular, Mediterranean Revival, Art Deco, Streamline Moderne, or variations thereof. Satisfied. The subject home was designed by architect Curtis Haley and built by the Florida Construction Company in 1940. It is a modest example of the Minimal Traditional style of architecture. Characteristic of this style, the residence is one-story in height with a front- facing gabled roof, close roof eaves, and a chimney. Its significant architectural features include multiple roofs with clay barrel tiles, wooden rafter tails, decorative vents at the base of the structure, a recessed front porch with a brick accent wall and a terrazzo tile floor and steps, decorative molding that frames the picture window to the east of the front porch, slender pipe columns supporting the rear porch, and a decorative vent with a floral pattern on the west elevation of the attached garage. Together all of these architectural features contribute to the special character and architectural significance of this modest residence. . The exterior of the structure is recognizable as an example of its style and/or period, and its architectural design integrity has not been modified in a manner that cannot be reversed without unreasonable expense. Satisfied. The exterior of the subject home is clearly recognizable as an example of its style and period with limited modifications. In 1947, just seven years after its original construction, a modestly designed addition was built on the south side of the home. Two years later, a small enclosed porch was built at the far south end of the 1947 addition. Both of these additions are located at the rear of the property and are not visible from the street. Other minor modifications to the original design of the subject residence include the removal of decorative window shutters, the modification of several original masonry window openings, the removal of the original landscape planter below the picture window just to the east of the front porch, and the modification of the original garage door opening from a segmental arch to a horizontal fiat arch. These limited modifications do not have a significant negative impact on the architectural integrity of the residence. Re: 980 West 48th Street March 2, 2006 Page 2 of 2 . Significant exterior architectural characteristics, features, or details of the subject structure remain intact. Satisfied. The subject home has not been significantly altered and appears to be substantially consistent with its original architectural design. . The subject structure embodies the scale, character, and massing of the built context of its immediate area. Satisfied. The one-story residence is compatible with the built context of the surrounding single-family homes in terms of scale, character, and massing. The Planning Department has determined that the subject building, although a modest residence, does meet the criteria in Section 142-108(1) and, therefore, is architecturally significant. This determination relative to architectural significance of the single-family home may be appealed within ten (10) days of rendering such decision. The appeal must be in writing and shall be to the Design Review Board. In accordance with Section 142-108(4), a request for the total demolition of an architecturally significant single-family home must be reviewed by the Design Review Board (DRB). A permit for the demolition of an architecturally significant single-family home shall not be issued unless a full building permit for new construction has been issued. In the event an architecturally significant home is proposed to be demolished, the Design Review Board shall review and approve all new construction on the subject site. If you wish to pursue the total demolition of the subject structure and the construction of a new home, please contact Michael Belush, Senior Planner, at 305-673-7000 ext. 6258, in order to schedule a pre-application conference for the Design Review Board. Because staff has determined this single-family home to be architecturally significant, we would like to suggest that you consider requesting that the Historic Preservation Board evaluate the property for local individual historic structure designation. There can be significant tax and other benefits to historic designation, and staff would be pleased to discuss these opportunities with you and assist in this process. Please contact either myself or Shannon Anderton, Senior Planner, to schedule an appointment to discuss this matter further at 305-673-7550. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Shannon Anderton, Senior Planner, at 305-673-7550. Sincerely, C: Robert Parcher, City Clerk Jorge G. Gomez, Planning Director Thomas R. Mooney, Design and Preservation Manager Shannon Anderton, Senior Planner SFRRB File No. 63 WHC:SMA F:\PLAN~$ALL~,Single Family Homes\CorrespondenceS980 West 48th St. sma.doc We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live, work, and play in our vibrant, tropical, historic community. City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 SYLVIA FOX Apm-mmnt/4 123 I 4101 Pine[tee Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33140 December 27, 2005 ATTN: PL,ANNI. NG DEPAR'T'MENT Re:: Propert5? A,ddress: 980 West 48th Street, Miami Beach Folio Number: 02-3222-014-0740 Dear Sirs and Mesdames: This is my request for a determination of"ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE" regarding thc structure on my property located at 980 West 48~ Street, Miami Beach, Florida. This request is made in conjunction with and in support of my application to demolish the structure, which application I made several months ago. I wish to demolish the structure as soon as possible. The structure is very old, seriously deteriorated, m6nhabitable, and has been boarded up for at leas: a decade. It has been cited numerous times by the. City, and is unsafe. The house has been uninhabited for at least 20 years, except when vagrants occasionally broke in in the past. For the last several years, even the vagrants ;vill not inhabit it. It has been broken into m~d robbed by teenagers who have othet'wise previously been in trouble with the law. Neighbors have made several complaints to the City about the structure. It is a nuisance to the neighborhood, The structure is not usable as is, or even if it could be repaired, which is not possible. It is also undesirable, as no one would want to live in it with its floor plan. Although located in a single family zone. it has 3 separate residences, not one of which is nicely designed. There is no way to redesign the layout so that it is useful. It is functionally obsolete. The structure has absolutely no interesting, noteworthy, historic, design, or otherwise significant physical characteristic. It also has no valuable or significant historic previous use that would make saving it of any benefit or interest to anyone. I have designated Demolition Masters, Inc. to undertake the demolition once you make the appropriate determination that the structure has no architectural significance. I am currently staying with my daughter in the Baltimore area, while I obtain treatment at Johns Hopkins and Memorial Sloan-Kettering for my cancer. Our mailing address is 9050 Iron Horse Lane: # 211, Pikesville, MD 21208, and my phone number is 410-363-8361. Please contact mc at this location rather than at my permanent address above, should you have any additional questions or with notification of any meetings or hearings, or with your determination. Thank you for your a_nticipated prompt attention to this matter. er3.' tga15 vours,