2000-24159 RESO
~'"
-'\ t
b~-
~ t1-J-
~~
LAW OFFI.CES
,
, i
,'"t,."
EDWARD E. LEVINSON, P .A. .,...
PENTHOUSE SOUTHEAST
407 LINCOLN ROAD 0) .J
MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139
- (';1'
"- ;'r-'
,.....(,i ..... }")
'.
.fj
January 21, 2002
"/ .
t, I; ,
Raul J. Aguila, Esq.
City Attorney's Office
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive, 4th Floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Re: quit-Claim Deed, dated November 8, 2000, by and between the city of
Miami Beach, Florida and William Zubkoff and Carolee DeVitQ, his wife
Dear Raul:
.,.
In connection with the above Quit-Claim Deed, I am enGI6sing herewith a copy of
same which was recorded onDecember 27,2001, in Official Records Book 20102, page
Thank you for your cooperation and courtesy in. this matter.
Sincerely,
EEUdlm
Enclosure
cc: Dr. William Zubkoff and Carolee DeVito, his wife
(with copy of enclosure)
clients\hospital\zubkoff.let
OFf, REC OK.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 5 9
."
This Instrument Prepared By
RAul J. Aguila. Esq.
c/o City of Miami Beach
City Attorney's Office
1700 Convention Center Drive, 4th Floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
o 1R71S76 7 2001 DEe 27 08:4
OOCSTPDEE 57.60 SURTX 0.0
QUITCLAIM DEED HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK DADE COUNTY, F
TillS QUITCLAIM DEED, made this tft day of JJbVtmltlJUZ- , ~, by first party,
CITY OF MIAW BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, ("Grantor"),
whose address is 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139, to WTI...LIAM ZUBKOFF
and to CAROLEE DEVITO, his wife, ("Grantees"), whose address is 2 Hibiscus Drive, Miami
Beach, FL 33139.
\VITNESSETH, that the first party, for good consideration and for the sum of TEN
DOLLARS AND NO/100 ($10.00) paid by the said se~nd party, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledgea, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the said second party, all right, title
interest and claim which the said first party has in and to the following described parcel ofland and
improvements and appurtenances thereto in the County of Miami-Dade, State of Florida to wit:
Portion of a 20 foot street bounded on the North by the South line of the Lot 60,
Block 2, and bounded on the South by the North line of Lot 1, Block 3, all in
"HIBISCUS ISLAND", Plat Book 8, Page 75, Public Records of Miami-Dade
County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
Commence at the Northeast comer of the above mentioned Lot 1, Block 3; all in
"HIBISCUS ISLAND", Plat Book 8, Page 75 Public Records of Miami-Dade
County, Florida; thence run Westerly, along the Northerly line of said Lot 1 for a
distance of60.80 feet to the POlNT OF BEGINNING of the portion of land herein
described; thence deflect 90000'00" to the Right for a distance of 5.00 feet; thence
Westerly, parallel to the North line of said Lot 1 for a distance of41.75 feet; thence
deflect 90000'00" to the Left for a distance of 5.00 feet; thence Easterly along the
North line of said Lot I for a distance of 41.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said land located in the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and containing 209 square feet
more or less. ("The Property'').
This Property herein conveyed to Grantees for so long as the residential addition to 2
Hibiscus Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, located on the above described Property is not demolished.
In that event, the Property and all right, title and interest vested in Grantees and/or their successors
in interest in the Property shall automatically revert back to the City of Miami Beach, Florida, for
right-of-way purposes at no cost to the City. S'uch condition to remain in effect for twenty-one (21)
years from the date of recordation of this Quitcl~im Deed with the Office of the Clerk of Miami-
Dade County, Florida, in accordance with Section 689.18, Florida Statutes, or longer if Florida Law
so allows,
1
~
/
ofF. REC BK.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 0
IN \VITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and
this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officials on the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence.
P~~,I!r 46D:>D
CITY OF J.\t1I
Municipal Co
EACH,'a Florida
," :'~''''..' . . .
#....
..
",'" ,
-'.. -,; "- ~-~~.~..:. .-
....,.... ')- ~'~
By: -, \
Name: Neisen'cy. Kas~lm ,t
T'l M '. .. · .
It e: ayor";l;.:I~'lr~ f t
Attest:~hT~~
CIty Clerk: -RoDert Patcher -
-':,; ~,,-_ ~~:;:.~~;~t?~iY:;~>,
~ . Grantor's Addr~~~ 7QQ_'C()liy.~on Center Dr.
Miami Beach, FL 33139
Attention: City Manager
~~rrp
STATE OF FLORIDA . )
) S S:
COUNTYOF~~ADE )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State of
Florida and in Miami-Dade County to take acknowledgements, personally appeared NEISEN O.
KASDIN, the Mayor of The City of Miami Beach, a Florida Municipal Corporation, who executed
the foregoing instrument on behalf of said city and who acknowledged to and before me that he did
so voluntarily and for the purposes set forth herein, and who is personally known to me.
-It,
~ss my hand and official seal in the Miami-Dade County, Florida this :IS day of
,2001..
.
My Commission Expires:
OFFIQAL NOfAIn' Sf.AL
ULLlA.'" BEAUCHAMP
l\:OfARY PUBUC sr ATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC73837'2
MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 2S.2lm
Commission No.:
(Seal)
II'PRCNEDM1O
FORMaLANGUAGl!
& FOR EXECUTION
2
OfF. REC Bl<'
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 I
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-24159
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMl\fiSSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE SALE OF
APPROXIMATELY 200 SQ. FEET OF THE CITY -O~LD RIGHT-OF-
WAY ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2
SOUTH IDBISCUS DRIVE, MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TO DR. wn.LIAM
ZUBKOFF AND CAROLEE DEVITO (THE OWNERS); ,V AIVING, BY
5/7THS ,VOTE, THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENT
PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-2783; AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS
TO EFFECTUATE THE TRANSACTION, INCLUDING A QUIT CLAIM
DEED, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW OF SAME BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
WHEREAS, a private encroachment currently exists on the public right-of-way adjacent
to the residential property, located at 2 Hibiscus Drive, Miami Beach, Florida (the Property),
presently owned by Dr. William Zubkoff and Carolee DeVito (the O\\ners); said encroachment
consisting of a two-story residential addition with a family room on the ground level and bedrooms
on the second floor; and
WHEREAS, the cause of the encroachment -- i.e. the construction of the aforestated
residential addition -- was partly due to an inaccurate survey prepared by Lannes and Garcia, Inc. in
1984, which was relied upon by the Owners and the City when said addition was permitted and
constructed in and around 1991; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding-the encroachment resulting from the inaccurate survey, the
Owners obtained the necessary permits to design and construct the aforestated addition, including
a variance from the Board of Adjustment; and
WHEREAS, in order to obtain clear title for the Property, on April 29, 1999, the Owners
filed a Complaint to Quiet Title in the Circuit Court, said lawsuit styled Zubkoffv. City of Miami
~, Case No. 99-10538 CA 32, as well as a civil action against the surveyor, Lannes and Garcia,
Inc" seeking monetary damages for the erroneous survey; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsequent negotiations with the Administration and the City
Attorney's Office, recognizing the hardship that has resulted to the Ov.ners as a result of failure to
secure clear title for the Property (due to the erroneous survey), and also acknowledging that,
although Owners may prevail in their action against the surveyor, any monetary damages from said
lawsuit, would still not result in clear title to the Property, Owners and the City have attempted to
reach a mutually agreeable settlement to this matter; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, Owners had an appraisal performed by Integra Realty Resources,
which appraised the approximately 200 sq. ft. parcel, representing only that portion of the residential
addition which encroaches upon the public right-of-way (the Building Footprint), on December 30,
1999, at $9,550.00; and
orf. REt Bit
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 2
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2000, the City had its own appraisal prepared by Appraisal First,
Inc., which appraised the Building Footprint at $1,400.00; and
WHEREAS, in settlement of this matter, the City Attorney's Office and the Administration
would recommend the sale of the Building Footprint, representing approximately 200 sq. feet of the
adjacent public right-of-way, to Owners; said sale, as mutually agreed to by Owners and the
Administration, to be recommended at the Owners' appraised value, or S9,550.00; and
WHEREAS, in the event that the Mayor and City Commission herein approve the sale of
the Building Footprint (which encroaches 5 feet into the adjacent 20 foot right-of-way), the overall
impact to the adjacent right-of-way would be minimal, with the remaining portion still accessible
for the public's use and enjoyment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No, 92-2783, which establishes
procedures fo~ the sale and/or lease of City property, prior to a sale and/or lease, the Mayor and City
Commission shall hold a public hearing, advertised not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the
hearing, in order to obtain citizen input into the proposed sale and/or lease; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, a public hearing was held on November 8,2000, to hear public
comment regarding the proposed sale of the Building Footprint to Owners; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-2783, the City's Planning Department has
prepared its analysis of the proposed sale, and, additionally, the Administration would recommend
that the Mayor and City Commission further waive, by 517ths vote, the competitive bidding
requirement, as provided by Ordinance No. 92-2783, finding the proposed sale, in settlement of the
lawsuit tiled by Owners against the City, to be in the best interest of the City; and
WHEREAS, as further consideration for its approval of the proposed sale, the
Administration would also recommend that Owners agree to remove an encroaching fence/wall
which currently exists on the public right-of-way at issue, and that Owners agree to a reverter in the
deed of conveyance wherein, in the event the residential addition thereon is ever demolished, the
Building Footprint will revert back to the City for right-of-way purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission herein approve the sale of approximately 200 Sq. Ft. of the City-owned right-of-way
adjacent to the residential property located at 2 South Hibiscus Drive, Miami Beach, Miami-Dade
County, Florida, to Dr. William Zubkoff and Carolee Devito, as Owners, as follows:
I. The Mayor and City Commission acknowledge and herein approve the sale of
approximately 200 sq. ft. of the City-owned right-of-way adjacent to Ov,ners' residence located at
2 South Hibiscus Drive, said sale representing only the Building Footprint of the encroaching two-
2
OfF.Rte 8K.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 3
story residential addition. Accordingly, the amount of the sale price for the Building Footprint is the
highest appraisal value (representing the appraisal obtained by Owners by Integra Realty Sources,
dated December 30, 1999), in the amount of $9,550.
2,
following:
The sale of the Building Footprint to Owners is subject to and contingent upon the
a. Upon approval of this Resolution, Owners shall agree to dismiss, with
prejudice, the lawsuit filed in this cause against the City styled, Zubkoffv.
City of Miami Beach, 11th Judicial Circuit, Case No. 99-10538 CA 32.
b. Owners agree to the immediate removal of any encroaching fence/wall which
may have been erected or installed by Owners within or adjacent to the right-
of-way, and the City shall have no obligation to convey title to the Building
Footprint until such time as said removal is complete.
c. Owners acknowledge that the sale of the Building Footprint is herein
approved by the Mayor and City Commission, taking into consideration the
particular hardship to Owners herein, as a result of Owners' inability to
obtain clear title, as well as the presumption that said encroachment was
erected pursuant to an erroneous/inaccurate survey. Accordingly, in the event
that the improvement(s), consisting of the residential addition on and over the
Building Footprint, is ever demolished, the Building Footprint, as sold herein
shall revert back to the City for right-of-way pwposes.
d. All proceeds from the sale herein will be used by the City for public
improvements on the PalmlHibiscus Islands,
3. The Mayor and City Commission herein waive, by 5nths vote, the competitive
bidding requirement, pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-2783, finding such waiver to be in the best
interest of the City.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of November
, 2000.
ATTEST:
~~cf~~
~YOR
RJA \kw
F:\A TrO\AGUR\RESOS\2HIBSPH.SAL
APPROVED ~ TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
3
~~
ify Affomey iqlA.
I ( -1-d7J
Date
OFf. !lEe BX.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 ~
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. $51-00
TO:
Mayor Neisen O. Kasdin and
Members of the City Commission
DATE: November 8,2000
FROM:
Jorge M. Gonzalez \ :-.L/'
City Manager 0 ~~
SUBJECT:
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY CO:\IMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIA1\H BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE SALE OF
APPROXIMATELY 200 SQ. FEET OF THE CITY-OWNED RIGHT-OF-
WAY ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2
SOUTH HIBISCUS DRIVE, MIAiW BEACH, FLORIDA, TO DR. WILLIAM
ZUBKOFF AND CAROLEE DEVITO (THE O~"ERS); WAIVING, BY A
517THS VOTE, THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENT UNDER
ORDINANCE NO. 92-2783; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL DOCUMEl\iS TO EFFECTUATE
THE TRANSACTION, INCLUDING A QUITCLAL'I DEED, SUBJECT TO
FINAL REVIE\V OF SAME BY THE CITY A TTOR'\"EY'S OFFICE.
ADMlNlSTRA TION RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution with the recommended conditions.
ANALYSIS:
Dr. William Zubkoff and Carolee De Vito(the Owners) own the property at 2 South Hibiscus Drive,
adjacent to an undeveloped twenty(20) ft. wide City alley/right-of.way (see Attachment #1- map of
Hibiscus Island).
In 1990, the Owners proposed to build an addition to their existing single family home. A setback
variance was obtained, plans were prepared and the Building Permit was obtained for a two story
addition, based on a survey prepared by Lannes and Garcia Inc. (See Attachment #2). However, after
the two story addition was built, this original survey was found to have a 10 ft. error, as a result of
which the two story addition is encroaching 5 ft. into the adjacent 20 ft. alley/right-of-way (see as
built survey-Attachment #3). In addition, the property fence wall was built about 10ft. into this
alley.
AGEl\l)A ITEM ((, -, B
DATE J( - g- ~cf)
OFF. Irc BK.
20 , 0 2 PG 3 6 6 5
On April 29, 1999 the Owners filed a Complaint to Quiet Title in the Circuit Court and a civil action
against the surveyor, Lannes and Garcia Inc., for the erroneous survey. Additionally, after
negotiations with City staff regarding the hardship that resulted due to this error and hoping to settle
this matter with the City, the Owners obtained an appraisal from Integra Realty Resources for the
-200 sq. ft. of the two story building footprint in the right-of-way. On December 30, 1999 this
footprint parcel was appraised at $9,550. The City requested to haye an additional appraisal
performed by an appraiser of its choice. The second appraisal, prepared by Appraisal First Inc.,
valued this parcel at $1,400, as of June 3, 2000.
Following this, the City Administration and City Attorney's Office eyaluated the merits of the
Owners' case, as well as pursuing settlement negotiations which would now recommend the sale of
the "building footprint parcel", as shown in Exhibit A, at the recommended appraised value of
$9,550. This sale would be in accordance with the requirements of City of Miami Beach City Code
Article II, Sec~ons 82-36 through 82-40, governing lease/sale of City property.
An analysis by the Planning Department is attached, in accordance with Section 82-38 of the City
Code. A five-sevenths vote of the City Commission will also be required to waive the public bidding
process,
Based on the above, the Administration recommends the following:
1. Sale of the footprint of the two story addition for $9,550, \\ith reversion rights to the
City in case of demolition of the building, and easement rights to underground
utilities within this area, if any.
2. Removal of the encroaching fence/wall within the right-of-way by Owners.
3. All funds from the sale of this parcel will be used for improvements on the Palm-
Hibiscus Islands. If approved by the Island Homeowners Association, it could be
used towards the reconstruction of the Palm-Hibiscus guard-house.
~~Jf.
F:\WORK\SALL\ VGK COMl"IE.\IOlV ACA TE\2SHIBISC. WPD
otto tEC BK.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 6
m
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Date:
Subject:
Matthew D. Schwartz
Assistant City Manager
Jorge G. Gome~
Planning and Z~ Director
October 30, 2000
Analysis of the City Owned Property at 2 South Hibiscus Island for
Sale of City Right-of-Way to Adjacent Property Owner
(Ordinance 92-2783)
To:
From:
Pursuant to your request, this memorandum serves to provide an analysis of the lease of
City Owned Property at the subject property.
Ordinance 92=2783 of the City of Miami Beach requires that any proposed sale or lease
of city-owned land be analyzed from a planning perspective in order that the City
Commission and the public are fully apprised of all conditions relating to the proposed sale
or lease. What follows, herein, are each of the eight criteria prescribed in said ordinance
and a response to each:
.1. Whether or not the proposed use is in keeping with City goals and objectives
and conforms to the City Comprehensive. Plan.
The property in question, approximately 200 square feet of right of way adjacent to
the residential property located at 2 South Hibiscus Drive, is part of an undeveloped
alley on Hibiscus Island The Future Land Use Map of the City's Comprehensive
Plan designates the site as RS, Residential Single-Family.
The sale of a portion of the right-of-way to the adjacent property, which now
contains a portion of the property owner's single family dwelling, would conform to
the land use designation contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The impact on adjacent property, including the potential positive or negative
impacts such as diminution of open space, increased traffic, noise level or
enhanced property values, improved development patterns and provision of
necessary services. Based on the proposed use of the property, the City shall
determine the potential impact of the project on City utilities and other
infrastructure needs and the magnitude of costs associated with needed
infrastructure improvements. Should it become apparent that further
evaluation of traffic impact is needed, the proponent shall be responsible for
obtaining a traffic impact analysis from a reputable traffic engineer.
OFF. REe SK.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 6 6 7
The portion of the right-of-way in question currently contains a portion of the single
family dwelling unit, which was built in error upon City owned land. The continued
use of the property for single family residential purposes should not have a
significant negative impact on the surrounding area. The construction of an addition
to the house and a fence upon this property decreased the open space available
on Hibiscus Island; however, there no further diminution of open space is expected,
nor will there be any negative impact regarding traffic, noise levels, property values,
development patterns, or provision of services.
3. A determination as to whether or not the proposed use is in keeping with a
public purpose and community needs, such as expanding the City's revenue
base, reducing City costs, creating jobs, creating a significant revenue stream
and improving the community's overall quality of life.
WhileJhe sale of the property is not specifically designed to foster community
needs, it serves to settle the matter between the property ovmers and the City, The
sale of the property will also create a one time revenue stream to the City of $9,550,
the appraised value of the parcel of land in question.
4. Determination as to whether or not the development is in keeping with the
surrounding neighborhood, will block views, or create other environmental
intrusions, and evaluation of the design and aesthetic considerations of the
project.
The existing single family dwelling unit located partially upon the subject property
is in keeping with the surrounding single family neighborhood. While the
construction of the addition ten years ago did somewhat block the view down the
alley, the construction has already occurred and it is unlikely that the encroaching
structure could be torn down.
5. The impact on adjacent properties, whether or not there is adequate parking,
street, and infrastructure needs.
There should be no negative impact on adjacent properties, other than that which
exists at this time. There is no need for additional parking or infrastructure.
6. A determination as to whether or not alternatives are available for the
proposed disposition, including assembly of adjacent properties, and whether
the project could be accomplished under a private-ownership assembly.
Not applicable.
2
OFr. REC 8K.
2 0 I 02 PG 36 6 8
7. Within the constraints of public objectives, the department should examine
financial issues such as job generation, providing housing opportunities, and
the return to the City for its disposition of property.
The City will receive $9,550, which has been determined to be the appraised value
of the property in question.
8. Such other items as the Planning Department may deem appropriate in
analysis of the proposed disposition.
It is recommended that the encroaching fence/wall within the right-of-way be
removed by the property owner. Additionally, the City should retain reversion rights
to the property in case of demolition of the building, and easement rights to
underground utilities within this area, if any.
JGG/RGUrgl
F:\PLAHIIALLIGEN_CORR\INTEROFAHIBISHAP.v.fID
3
6n, REt el.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 36 6 9
S/SCA YNE
SA Y
~
~ '.
~ -S-C'V.,s.
..
"
H'biscus Dr.
2 South 1
~
Attachment # 1
1IC
CD
~
III:
--.,:
~
o
,,.....
\D
M
c..o
a..
N
'0
o
N
t!rvaliof; =holNn r~kr: f" N.rD.V.C', JA~O'! ,S(!<J ~vel
.'.r. EIfV.. deno~s t..o"'J~S t Flocr ~/e~',;:;07"
(/nclu-7,"1 bO:~m~nr or t",'CI():V~(")
iI'<4!,.Q1e Ar:I;!;"~"..f G.-od!' c/~l/af;orl .. 6,.0'
I
I
I
rf'\
11~"
\"~ ~t
\ .../". ~.r
\.. ,1;""--- ,/ "" C-~I
\......., /. .' "';~.VG
.. /.. ..;' .......f"~---
'/ ",'/.. "
\. /~/ "r
'\-I'ts./....../l~'" ~ :td..
. '" .,.
...... .
, , ~
" I
~~
li~
II~
,'5
p:
:' V\
,,~
V"
loR
';:1:.
!J .
.
>-
-
- ---- -
Sl:l
!2. "'I
-
= ... t"'
- I "'l1ll'tl1ll0...... 3: CIII Z .. 8
n ,.:. .....CC...O..');; ~ .
= aJ llon"., "" II ~ C
. .... < t'" to :J .. <
- I CIIIlI:ra."'lIlCII< .. a
:;:: \Q ~~~~ 6.C"~ !l~~~ .
0 ~
tv i z
01 NrT... '<a....=c... M
, ,... .. :l C
... co,... UI ... CII~
.D
n ,...... c :r.. ...c >
" II " """CII.;Z ..... M
III - ,."~=~
'" lJl n tII co
,.. cr
... a.:T CII ...
... .. CII co
....
... -
II ... IJI"':"'''J;- >- .
a.
. "'~r j.....I'.i g :J
l~ !.~.... ." a.
Ii:., - ~""'i~" :i'
"'l ~ ';10 III 1. C
... ... ' :: I :...c Z <
(I ! .~!f;iih; ~ ..
0 : ~:'!l;!;l co
a. oC .
N ~ '''ri:~;fH CII '"
(I c '"
:J = co
ID .. .1 ._
w 1:-1'.&.' < co
..
III n-fi:i. I': :r-
oC
a. I --15 %
a. !!~i"""
" . . ,.. ~ cr
a. ..
III UO" !:!
. ;;;
Q. '.. ..
...,... ..0
\A zaJ 0
I"'l 00 .,
I' III i <
'" ~ "CII , It
to "'. ,...
~. .. ? :c~ ::J:
... n ;:'..' z
... -. ..
I' .r- . ; ~GlI~ !
a. ...
""i '" . ...:. ~~..- CD
o. 117 ..:T. It
i r ~ ~ ~:.~ .
n
" ;r
" .. ~""
,6 ~ ~;;:.i~= ~
,. ..... =:;:" ':'oQ Cl
"~ [)z f. s;,!" .,
: ...
w ~ttt- ..
... CX
::;: ~...!"
- -" '" ~,.
\0 0>. . I"
0 -. ';:=
'co
I .... ..
... ~z
"..
- . - --.
~.J
.,-
, ."
~ .~
','" \
i
~ I
." I
3-
.. I
I
... r
I
Q
~
<
1\
t-
'.
~
!-
...
..
'.
::;
~c.
...
\.
...
... ..-. ..........- .._--~._--
-'
._tD~=.....,.._ ......
~ &.~~~ooi"~ ~
,. - n., VI
&JI .,,......tD7lt"_-o....
.. lit... n)C ~ _ . "'CII
nc:-....c..t"'._..,
C ~ ~ ;. ~ 0" "':1 .g
::J ~.~ '-0 a. -. Of ,... a:r nt
c... D: '" -"3"-'"
ID 0...,. :ca.:::.,. II 0 ~
"'f - -0.,,,,,<
~ ;-2-:;~.~Of~: ~...
c.or-non"". '"
c: ""3"<: c:... 0 n
g, i" V'I;V\~.e; -. "\
--~ -." c:r
=="'" Vt ..,:C I'D
I) o...,....mr-otD_ c..
:;, OID>Ofl>.....ntD
o 7'P ~ Z"< Z 0 _ ..
.~ _~ c- ?:~~ 411
~~ ,"",-:(0' :If'DC:
DI C) =rRtGlo..o..V'I
2. ;-;';:;';-aN_._
5 ~ ~ '::1""3 _ 0:1 ~
e Oto~"''<.-'''"G>
:;,c<. -,.,-z
"'~ID"'~=l'Da.O
eft ..~n~.c,...~o
Of ~;:.g=.g~g''''''
:II <0"'0.0'"
a. ~~:t ~ ID ~ ~
:lRtOlDnco
0.0.......::10. CD
:J _.
O.............."f"I't
.....O-::r_.n
-11t.ou:. Dr
....,... OID'<.
::r::r... zc ::I
"'IDI"~"'~I'D
"""CD,..,... CD
.... _. :r::l 0 .
· '" ~ .. a..-.~
"'f".,
ID..,_.,.._
'< ,...""< C7'::r ""
0:1 CRt-..
.....""0.,.. .
-..,:, ,.. ~:J
-'0' a.._.c~..
-QIII,.. :Jc:rV'
o '< :r VI~ _
.., IDO _.n
a:;;N~;;nj
.. -071'1' ~"'C
.r;"",,~c~;
a..~O-QfO_
.. '" 0'< ....., r'D
... ... to a. '"
,.n "','"
c..S::'a:~o;a
"""'CII ., Rt 0 """ 0
,..- :I c:
"'CII :I "'CII -... O"'CII
"""'c _. Of .
3-2.i~~..,
CJ":I "'0. n
It .... n
"li'g;2.2.g~
-nta.. ::Ie.
AQ. "''-~_
.. 0"'< :31
_~ ~.,.... \0
C
..
...
...
...
,.
...
"
..
...
...
a.
...
~
C;
,.
-
C
"
III
,.
,~
I:..
.... ~
~ ~ ii
~ .,...0
~ jf.J
q; .
"-
~
!
~~
140.'"
-. .....
:-' ~
O. \:~
"-
~
......
'1:--"
IS.._I.~
/"7..':'
~
~ I
-to"
"*-
..i!..~
~~~
"'-
t'O:>. 'l
..~
~-~
~
).
.!
~
B/5CAYN€
:;:
CAY
~
-
=-=
CD
~
CI:
c..:
.....
C3
..r-
\0
M
(..!:)
0-
N
o
o
N
-. ..
'1
! -----
u.... ... ':\ ~ t.-,. _
-~'''~:ll.t).
":' ......- .... l\. . e C .
!'IV. ~, !'l \) l' .
,J4.. . .~Cl
~~.-~~ ~ · ~ if
1:. ~~.~.\ ~ lt~... \j
~11l)., "'. .~
~ ~~() '" ~ p ~
,,"i.~~1t""\ f
c"':!It~~~ ~
: ii)~;l~ ~
,. .~...~~
~ ...~ ~ ~
j: ! ~'-i'
~\
l
~
>
;:::
~
~
=
....
(;)
a
~
l...J
r-
~
~~
~
~t.-
1,';
~
~
~~~~-'~
~- ~
o.
~.
e,...sc:..~""'€ c" 'I
f Z
:'Sl
7~
.~ !:
~ 0...
: ~
~.r
~.:
~t
0..
;:
o
::l
=
..
g
A
()I
lli
->
--
....
~
()
r-ji
>
1\1
t.
o ..
4
-
I
!
)
. .~i
1'.
Sl
,.
r
I
I
(}r
f;~
(\ ...
f.
VI
~iU~e'5~-o~,r.JE. _
~w:: ,1:l/,?I'5I~: _ ~::_.
f~i'r~~~. ~r
- iL. .....~.~:..;:~,': .~:- :<~l J
.. ~"'"
.; ..:~
",.1)
":6:&
~. ..
t!.
'..
I
i:
~.
i
-j
I.
,
I
~
t' ~
<::l. K.
'i ~
~ '"
~
:.. -.: . w
!J---. ~., ~e\ll~U"Jl::)&IC
~ ~ '. to 'j' ...... rt;
'. "....COJ
.... 0: .. '" t . !.=i .
f. ..~...~
; . J(-.F
.,. -,.. - -...:. - - -...:.... -:'.' 1 S' ~
~ / 7<:)' , ~ I,'. ..,' _ .
{ 12. '!os.:::. . . .. .. ,.,
'-- - ... \ - ... '.
~y a,. "'''T .. _ . - _I ..~ "'--?
~c N<8/~ '=G4<..o . ,,~::.. ; i e ~.
~6 ~ A:; 7$ ~C".~. ,g ~ .~ ""l f
!!';: ~;.~~
~E ~~_1l~
;!: ~.~
'- 't
~ ~b-
.:~
:.~
....
(
~ 2
.. ..
- ..
f l
.. Co
.. ;;
:>. .
e- :-:
.. ...
r:: ::
~ ~
(:) E
. ..
. .
o >
~ ;
= i
... .
... '"
. 0
~ ;:
;. ~
~. t;
- :
~ .
c.: is"
., i:
:: .
~ .;
z
" ...
i >
; z
... z
.. ...
~ ...
o ..
1: l
.
< a
:; >
o
. .
...
n
;: ;:
~ .
~ z
Z n
! .
..
'"
e,1~~l.itJ!S
e.~y
"":Ju,JI~1 ......'01"...
eASlD ON
IICAAlHQS. I' ..,., ~.
orf. RlC ex.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 3 612
Sheet 1 of2
EXHIBIT tf A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Portion of a 20 foot street bounded on the north by the south line of the Lot 60, Block 2, and
bounded on the south by the north line of the Lot 1, Block 3, all in "Hibiscus Island", Plat Book 8,
Page 75, Public records of Miami-Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
Commence at the northeast comer of the above mentioned Lot I, Block 3; all in "Hibiscus
Island", Plat Book 8, Page 75 Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida; thence run westerly,
along the northerly line of said Lot 1 for a distance of 60.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
of the portion of land herein described; thence deflect 900 00' 00" to the right for a distance of 5.00
feet; thence westerly, parallel to the north line of said Lot 1 for a distance of 41.75 feet; thence
deflect 900 OO'-i){)" to the left for a distance of 5.00 feet; thence easterly along the north line of said
Lot 1 for a distance of 41. 75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said land located in the City of
Miami Beach, Florida and containing 209 square feet more or less.
I HEREBY CERTIFY: that this SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION is correct and meets the Miniml."m Technical Standards set by the
FLORJDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS as set forth in Chapter 472.027 (F.S.) and Chapter6lGl7-6 of the Florida
Administr:1tive Code. This survey does not reflect or determine ownership. Not valid without the signature and raised seal of a Florida
licensed Surve ' d. apper.
J.A. VARGAS-City Surveyor
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive
Miami Beach, Florida, 33139
Tel.: (305) 673 7080
Florida Department of Transponastion - District VI
WPI No. : N/A
See/Job No.
F.A.P. No.
State Road No.
County/Key/MM
Parcel No,
: 87060-2202
:N/A
: AlA (~lacArthur Causeway)
: Dade
: TIBIA
,ICH.."'ISYs\WORXISALLIIV"',^ v ACHIB1S DOC
IIII~
n
-c~
co
-CIl-n
i r
gnB:
~ -
.:E~
~OB:
i:::o_
~ ^
lUlal
sO~
I~n
1>::1:
i' :::0 ..
t-l_
- s:: ..
1lI""r-
ZO
-I:a
-
CI
~
"":;:0:;:0",,
. ~ )pp r
co.. te n f"Tl
Cl
f"Tl
Z
t:j
"":;:0:;:0",,
J>rJ>CiCJCJ
Cl1>S:I:ZZ
I"'1-tC-t-t-l
teV)C1C1C1
C1 ...,...,...,
C1
^ <ten
1>fTlCJ
-(Cl3:
.....3:
ZI"'1
Zz
-n
C11"'1
J>C/)
^
Irrl
rrl~
GIn
J>I
z I
CJ
-t ~
-t tjD
C1
V) rrl
n (/)J>
1>
r nn
fTl
/On
I---tD
-o~
-1-0
1---tJ>
DZ
z-<
OFF. REe BK.
2 0 , 0 2 PG 36 7 3
~ _ HIBISCUS ~ _ __
-. ~ T - <60' R/\/l
:;a
]> t.l I
20
]> -
r
-
I
, ---i---
I
I
I
f
I
I
-..
,"
.z
J:o
-,g
~~
1IlJ:
n
c.
111-
Z
_l""'l
VI
.0
>..,
Z
CI.
.0
"'ll~
i=-
. .
mt:l:l
. .
~~
"w
UI
:5
>
x
7 "'ll
CI P
~ ~
l""'l
n
o lJ'
~ 0
-I CD
-< ,g~
"-
<:
---
:i~
-c:
~~
1IlJ:
n
c:.
VlZ
-,..,
VI
.0
>"'l
Z
CI.
"0
:;:j"'ll~
~i=lJ'
0'0
~ (1)"-
. t:l:l
\).
.~
utI\)
:5
]>
!
I
CI
>
o
l""'l
~. ~
~ ~ ~-ffi
--.--
---
V)
:I:
1"'1
M
-t
"'ll l3ISCA YNE BAY
b
f1
I\)
o
...,
I\)
llff. REC BK.
2 0 I 0 2 PG 367 4
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
NOTiCE is HEREBY given that a public hearing will be held by the
City Commission of the City of Miami Beach on Wednesday,
November 8, 2000, at 3:00 p.m., in the Commission Chambers, 3rd
Floor, City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach,
Florida, to consider public comment# as required by Ordinance No.
92-2783, regarding the sale of approximately 191 square feet of the
City-owned right-of-way adjacent to the residential property
located at 2 Hibiscus Drive, Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County,
Florida.
inquiries may be directed to the Legal Department at (305)
673-7470.
ALL iNTERBSit'lll>-~iU are invited to appear at this meeting, or
be represented by an agent, or to express their views in writing
addressed to the City Commission, c/o the City Clerk, 1700
Convention Center Drive, 1st Floor, City Hall, Miami Beach, Florida
33139. This meeting may be continued and under such circumstances
additional legal notice would not be provided.
Robert E. Parcher, City Clerk
City of Miami Beach
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Fla. Stat., the City hereby advises
the public that: if a person decides to appeal any decision made by
the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at its
meeting or its hearing, such person must ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This
notice does not constitute consent by the City for the introduction
or admission of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor
does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by
law.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
persons needing special accommodation to participate in this
proceeding should contact the City Clerk's office. Telephone (305)
673-7411 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida
Relay Service numbers, (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770
(VOICE), for assistance.
RECORDERS NOTE:
The Ie iblr . .
9 .ty of Wf:1ln9, tYJllng or ~rlnting unsatis-
facta.-._ . . .
''!'" 1 In thIS document when received.
~~~~~
;it: DADe Cf()UITV. Fl.~
ItEcORO VERIFIeD
HARVEY RUVlN
CLERJ( C/RCU" COURT