2010-27407 Resof ', -
• ;' RESOLUTION NO.I 2010-27407
A .RESOLUTION' OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
. MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
•. WITH MCCUMBER GOLF, .INC.; FOR DESIGN, BID AND AWARD, AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, IN THE NEGOTIATED LUMP
• SUM FEE.OF $294,500, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT.
OF $92,600 fOR APPROVED REIMBURSABLES, FOR TH'E PAR 3 GOLF
COURSE, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 07-
- 09/10; WITH FUNDING TO BE APPROPRIATED FROM THE MIDDLE '
BEACH' QUALITY OF LIFE RESORT TAX FUND 161.
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2009, the Procurement Division issued RFQ No. 07-
• 09/10 for Design Bid and °.Award, and Construction Management Services, in the negotiated "
lump sum fee of $294.500, plus an additional not to exceed amount of $92,600 for approved ~ '
" reimbursables for the Par 3 Golf Course; and '
WHEREAS, of its. February 3, 2010 meeting, the City Commission approved Resolution
~. No. 201.0-27324, accepting the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining. to he ranking of
:proposals pursuant o RFQ No. 07-09/10, and authorizing the Administration to enter into
.negotiations with the top-ranked firm of McCumber Golf, Inc..; and should the Administration not
be. able to negotiate with the top-ranked firm, authorizing the Administration to negotiate with the
second.-ranked firm, Bates Design Group, 'Inc.;-and should the Administration not be able to
negotiafe,wifh the second-ranked firm, authorizing the Administration to negotiate with the third-
. ranked firm,. Signature Design Services; Inc.; and
WHEREAS, following negotiations, the City was able to .reach an .agreement with
McCumber Golf, ,lnc., in the negotiated' lump sum amount of $294;500; and an additional
• amount of $92,600, for approved reimbursables. ~T~
" ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
' OF THE CITY:OF MIAMF BEACH, FLORIDA,. that •the Mayor and City Commission hereby
approve and authorize an Agreement with McCumber Golf, Inc. for Design, Bid and Award, and'
. Construction Management Services,. in -the negotiated lump sum fee of $294,500, plus pan
additional not to exceed amount of $92,600 for approved .reimbursables,. for the Par 3 Golf
Course. Project, with funding to be appropriated from the Middle Beach Quality of Life Resort
Tax Fund 161.
• ~ y
" PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9s~- DAY OF . J~'~- 2010.
ATTEST:" ~ f
. APR AS TO
Robert Parcher, City Clerk .~ ~ ~ Matti Herrera Bower-; Ma~ddRM & LANGUAGE
~ .FOta E CUTION
... ,,
• ~ Z ip
i y orney l}~\~ ate
. ~ ~ ~ CCOMMISSION hTEM SUMMARY
~ondensed.Title:
A Resolution accepting The City Manager's Recommendation tii authorizing the Mayor and-the City Clerk to execute
an Agreement with'McCumber Golf, lnc. for the Design, Bid And Award, And Construction Administration Services,
ForThe Redesign of The Par 3 Golf Course, in the negotiated Gump sum Fee of.$294,500p1us an additional Not To
Exceed amount of $92,600 for approved reimbursable for the Par 3 project, pursuantto RFQ No.07-09/10.Funding to
be appropriate from the Middle Beach~Quality of Life Fund Resort Tax 161. °
Ke -Intended Vutcome su ported: -
Ensure vvell-desi ned ualit ca ital ro'ects '
Supporting. Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): The 2009 Community satisfaction survey indicates
that 79% of Middle Beach .residents rate recreational programs and facilities as excellent or good. The 2009
community satisfaction survey indicates that when thinking about recreation in the City of Miami Beach, 46% of "Mid
Beach Islands" respondents feel the "8 years of age and. under" demographic-should benefit most from limited
.resources.
1„UC.
• Shall fhe Commission Adopt he Resolution? - ~ `
Item,Sunma /Recommendation:
- On October 8, 1997, the City of Miami Beach .issued RFQ No. 79-96/97 for a golf course Architect to prepare
' conceptual designs, plans and specifications for the upgrade of the Miami:.Beach, Normandy Shores, and the Par 3
' 'golf courses. On October 21, 1997, the City signed an Agreement pursuant tosaid'RFQ. While the Miami Beach and
°~' Normandy Shores courses were designed. and built, the„Par 3 was never designed due to-tack of funds. Upon
receiving input and ,recommendations-from the residents and the Bayshore Homeowners' Association (BHA), the
Mayorand City Commission at its October 1'4, 2009 meeting, authorized the Administration to issue an RFQ forthe
Design, Bid and Award, and Construction Administration Services, for the:Redesign of the Par 3 Golf Course. RFQ
No.07-09/10 was issued and sent to over 45 firms. Proposals were received and an Evaluation Committee appointed
6y the City Manager reviewed, interviewed key personnel, scored and ranked the proposals based on the published
'evaluation criteria.. Based oh the scoring and ranking, a motion was made and. passed by the .Committee that
• McCumber Golf Design, Inc.:wasthe-top-ranked firm;. Bates Golf Design was the second-ranked firm,. and.Signature
Design Services, fnc. was the third-ranked firm. Atits ..February 3, 2010 meeting, the City Commission approved
' Resolution'No. 2040-27324; hereby accepting the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of
proposals pursuantto Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 07-09/10, for Design, Bid and Award, and Construction
Administration Services, for the redesign of the Par 3' Golf Course;' authorize the. Administration to enter into
negotiations with the top-tanked firm of McCumber Golf, Inc. • .
..~ ,. On March 3; 2010. The'committee negotiated the fees and hourly rates in accordance with the typical billing hourly
• ~ rate, to where the committee.and the A/E team felt that a reasonable and acceptable fee for the approved scope had
• `been reached; and following negotiations, the City was able to reach an agreement with McCumber Golf; Inc., in the
• 'negotiated Lump sum amount. of $294,500.00, of which $249,500.00 is for Design and Bid /Award Services, and
• $45;000.00 for Construction Management Services for the entire duration of the construction phase. An additional
` ~ amount of $92,600, is provided for approved reimbursables, which are divided into $36,000:for initial Topographic,
_ Site, Landscaping survey, and finale as built; $4,500 Geo Tech testing; $22,100 Ground.monitoring'wells (DERM); .
$27,500 travel expenses;-$2;500 reproduction of plans and printing.
Ado t the Resolution. '
r Advisory Board Recommendation:
Financial Information ~ '
Source of . ..:. Amount ~ Account.
funds: ~ 1 $387;1.00 Middle Beach Quality Of Life Fund Resort tax 161
OBPt .. Total
Financial Impact Summary: .
l..lt 1.1~fK-
Humberto
' Si n-Of#s
vrnce ~eglslailve 1 racKmg:
;abanas, ext 4105
Department D'rector Assistant Ct Manager ` ~ Cit Manager
GL COC JGG PDW JMG
T:WGENDA\2010\June9\Consent\Far 3 -Summary.doc
. C
AGENDA f`rEt G ~/-~
I~A~ 6-9-1y
M IAM~ BEACH . _
. City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive; Miami Beach, Florida 33139; vrvrw.miamibeachfl.gov '
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
. TO: ' '. Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission
FROM: -Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager
', :DATE:- June 9, 2010. ..
SUBJECT: A.RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF .
". MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVINGAND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MCCUMBER GOLF, INC.; `
• - FOR„DESIGN,.. BID AND AWARD, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
- SERVICES, IN THE NEGOTIATED LUMP SUM FEE OF $294,500 (PLUS AN
~• ADDITIONAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $92,600 FOR APPROVED
.`: REIMBURSABLES) FOR THE PAR 3 GOLF COURSE, PURSUANT ° TO
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) N0.07=09/10; .FUNDING TO' BE .
APPROPRIATED FROM THE MIDDLE BEACH QUALITY OF LIFE RESORT TAX
FUND 161. ~ ,
`ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
:. Adopt the Resolution. ' '
KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED
Ensure well-designed quality capital projects
. .
FUNDING -
Funding in the amount of $387,100 to be appropriated from the Middle Beach Quality of Life
.,Resort :Tax Fund 161 ,
ANALYSIS "
On October 8, 1997, the City of Miami Beach issued RFQ number 79-96/97 for a golf course
..~ Architect to prepare conceptual designs, plans and specifications for the upgrade of the
Miami Beach, Normandy Shores,:-and the Par 3 golf courses. On October 21, 1997, the City
"signed an Agreement with; the top ranked firm. of Arthur.Hills and Associates, .pursuant to
" said' RFQ. While the Miami Beach and NormandyShores courses were designed and built,
• the Par 3 was .never designed due to lack of funds. '
On January. 5, 2009; due. to the time that had elapsed. and in response to requests from.
. residents of the Bayshore neighborhood, the City contracted Bruce Howard & Associates to
develop several_conceptual plans for the Par 3 golf course site. ~ ,
On March 3,1, 2009, the City held a publicly advertised meeting with the community at Miami
' ~ Beach Senior High~School: The following conceptual site plans were presented:
Refurbished 'Nine-Hole Par 3 Golf Course
Local Park
^ Hybrid Six-Hole f'ar 3 Golf Course % Local Park -
Commission Memorandum -Par 3 Golf Course
June 9, 2010
Page 2 of 4
While each of the plans was conceptual, certain elements were shown in all the plans based
upon community and staff input. Among these are a lake that would serve drainage,
irrigation, and fill functions; two to five tennis courts; public restrooms; a jogging trail around
the perimeter of the site; and a tot lot near the Scott Rakow Youth Center. The golf course
plans also have options for artificial turf and real turf.
The refurbished Par 3 option would retain a full nine-hole golf course as it exists today. The
design requirements for a fully functioning nine hole golf course require the use of most of
the space now occupied by the Par 3: Therefore, there is only a small space available for a
passive feature like a grove of flowering /fruit trees and tennis courts. This option was
favored by the community at the March 31St meeting.
The Park option would be designed for the local neighborhood with educational and
interactive features. Possible elements could include picnic and pavilion areas, an area for
fruit and flowering trees, a soccer field, open space and tennis courts.
The Hybrid option would retain asix-hole golf course and also provide some areas that
could be used for passive.and active park activities. The same picnic and pavilion areas, fruit
and flowering trees, tot lot, tennis courts, and open space elements available in the
previously mentioned park option would be available in this option.
The conceptual plans were presented to the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee on
June 25, 2009 and the item was referred to the Land Use Committee on September 14,
2009. During the Land Use Committee meeting, direction was provided to the Administration
to prepare a commission item for the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the
design, permitting, bid/award and construction administration services. It was discussed at
the Land Use Committee that the full Commission should be provided an opportunity to
opine on the three (3) options presented by Bayshore Homeowners' Association (BHA) to
determine which option the City should pursue.
Upon receiving input and recommendations from the residents and the BHA, the Mayor and
City Commission at its October 14, 2009 meeting, authorized the Administration to issue an
RFQ for the Design, Bid and Award, and Construction Administration Services, for the
Redesign of the Par 3 Golf Course at an estimated construction value of $3,100,000.
On November 2, 2009, the Procurement Division issued RFQ No..07-09/10, and notices
were sent to over 45 firms, which resulted in the receipt of 10 proposals on the due date of
December 3, 2009, from the following firms:
• Arthur Hills/Steve Forrest and Associates
• Bates Design Group, Inc.
• Dye Designs, Inc.
• Greg Norman Golf Course Design
• Jerry Pate Golf Design, Inc.
• McCumber Golf, Inc.
• Sanford Golf Design
• Shearon Golf
• ,Signature Design Services, Inc./Raymond Floyd Design
• Signature Golf Design, Inc.
Commission Memorandum - Par'3 Golf Course
June 9, 2010 ~ r
Page 3 of 4
On January 5,.2010, the City Manager via Letter to Commission No. 004-2010, appointed an
Evaluation Committee; that convened on January 19, 2010, and was provided with an
overview of the project, .information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the-
Government in the Sunshine Law. Nine of the ten firms-that submitted proposals, gave an
oral presentation to the Committee and participated in a question and.answer session, with
-the exception of Shearon Design which did not accept the City's invitation. Following the ,
..proposers' presentations, the Committee was instructed to-score and rank each. proposal
. pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ.
Based on the scoring .and ranking, a motion was made and passed by the Committee that
McCumber Golf Design, Inc. was the top-ranked firm, Bates Golf .Design was the second-
• .ranked. firm, and Signature Design Services, Inc. was the third=.ranked firm.
McCumber Golf fias over 30 years experience in fhe design and construction of golf
. courses, and they understand how they function in a large communities. Founded in_ 1971 as
a 'landscape design and golf consultant firm, McCumber Golf grew into golf course
architecture and construction. Headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, McCumber Golf is the
• parent company for three operating divisions. These include Mark McCumber & Associates,
a golf course architectural firm .headed by PGA Tour Professional Mark McCumber;
McCumber Construction, which specializes in constructing McCumber designed courses;
and McCumber Golf Facility Management, a golf course management and operations
consulting division of the company.
. McCumber Golf has designed, renovated and constructed more than 70 courses to date,
including private country club courses, resort courses, real estate development courses,
public ;courses, and executive courses. Their portfolio includes golf courses in Japan, Korea,
China, Costa Rica and Canada as well as the highlyaccla'imed golf course the Brickyard at
Riverside, in'Macon Georgia. .
At~its February 3, 2010 meeting, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2010-27324,
hereby accepting .the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of
. proposals pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 07-09/10, for Design, Bid and
Award, and Construction Administration Services, for the redesign of the Par 3 Golf Course;
authorized the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm of
` McCumber Golf, fnc., and should the Administration not be able to negotiate with the top- I
ranked firm, authorized the Administration to .negotiate with the second-ranked firm, Bates '~,
Design Group,lnc., and should. the Administration knot be able to negotiate with the second
ranked firm, authorized: the Administration to negotiate with the third-ranked firm, Signature j
Design Services; .:Inc. ~ ,
. On March 3, .2010, the first negotiation meeting was held between City Staff; the Special
_ Assistant to the City Manager and McCumber Golf who submitted a professional services
fee in the amount of $632,875.00. This was .not acceptable to the City and resulted in
approximately six{6) additional meetings where the fee, and scope were reviewed, revised
and re-evaluated. The City continued to negotiate the fees and hourly.rates (see schedule
C) until an agreement for a reasonable and. acceptable fee for the approved scope had been
reached.
.After many negotiations, the City was able to reach an agreement with McCumber Golf, Inc.,
for professional services in the negotiated Lump sum amount of $294,500., and $92,600 in
approved reimbursable expenses. broken .down as follows:
Commission Memorandum -Par 3 Golf Course
June.9; 2010
_ Page 4 of 4 , ,
Professional Services
.. ' ~ ~ Design, Bid and ~Award.Serv'ices: $249,500.00
• ~ • " ~ Construction Management Services:. $45,000.00
.Total Professional Services Fee: $294, 500 ,
Reimbursables:
FuII Topographic Survey /Final As Built Survey: $36,000
Geotechnical Testing: $4,500
Ground Monitoring Wells: $22;100
. Reproduction Costs: $2,500
Travel .Expenses: $27.,500
Total Reimbursable Expenses: $92,600
The total professional. services fee was successfully negotiated by City Staff and the Special ;
Assistantto the City Manager in the amount of $387,100 which has resulted in a significant ,
savings to the City in the. amount of $245,775.
CONCLUSION
" It is recommended that a :Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami
Beach; Florida be adopted, authorizing the Mayor and-City Clerk to execute an Agreement
_.
.with McCumber Golf, Inc. for Re-design, Bid and Award, and Construction Management
Services, in the negotiated ump sum Fee of $294,500.00 plus an additional Not to Exceed. -
amount of $92,600 for apps
07-09/10.
Attachments: -Schedule A
Schedule B
Schedule C
Schedule D
oved reimbursables, forthe Par 3.project, pursuant to RFQ No.
- Scope of A/E Consulting Services -
- Consultant's Compensation Fee Schedule
- Hourly Billing. Rates Schedule .
=Schedule (A/E)
Schedule A
City. of Miarni Beach Par 3 Golf Course
.. .
A/E Scope of Work. .
Task #1 -Conceptual Design
I. Site.Analysis & Preliminary Master'Planning
(1) Thorough review of the property with City staff and .consultants to identify
specific needs; goals and objectives. This would include as-built research
. ~ to identify any constraints on the .project site.
(2) Create a preliminary master plan the course that would be presented' to
the City staff for review and comments..
_ • • (a) This plan will address the proposed location of alf the major
'components of each golf hole including tees, greens, fairways, -lakes
. ~ and ..bunkers along.with other additional amenities and program. items
• ~ ,including tennis courts, splash pad; tree grove, jogging trail and tot- lot.
• (b) We would also review the parking impacts to the site that these
improvements would make and make recommendations as to the
parking needs'for the entire facility.. .
(c) Preliminary planning will include a written narrative discussing the
_ ~ improvements and a report detailing the condition of all support
infrastructure including the irrigation .and pump station, drainage
. structures, and cart paths.. This report would also establish
preliminary cost estimates. to guide the project scope and keep.the
. • project within budget. '
(3) Create a final .master plan based upon the feedback received from the
. ~ preliminary master planning. The Final Master'Plan will be created that
will erne as the basis for the improvements to the facility.
(4) Engineer will conduct pre-application meeting with the permitting
agencies and co-consultants.
Task #2 -Design Documents - •
(1) Once the city has accepted the Master Plan and finalized the scope of
work we wily begin work on the Phase I, II, and Ill construction
documents.
(2) This package will include all construction drawings for the golf course and
• ~ other amenities, technical -specifications for the work and all' standard City
' ~ of Miami Beach procurement documents for public bid including. but not .
limited to General Conditions' and sample contract between Owner and
Contractor. •
(3) Specific items to be completed include:
(a} 9-hole par 3: course
- (b) Tennis courts
(c) Jogging trail .
_ (d) Tot lot
- (e) Children's splash pad
(f) Restroom facility
(g) .Parking lot
~. (hj Tree Grove/Landscaping
(i) Lake & Drainage Design
U) Lighting Design
(k) Irrigation Design
(Ij Any other plans necessary for permits
(4) Cost estimates will be prepared foreach milestone of the Construction
- • Documents (30%, 60%, 90% and 100%)
(5) At the 60% construction milestone, the engineer will submit the formal
permit-applications to the appropriate agencies
- Task #3 -Bid Award.
(1) Assist in advertisement of bid ~ ` - "
(2) Hold a mandatory pre-bid .meeting for all interested contractors to .review
` ~ ~ the project and provide an open forum for questions. .
(3) Assist with. distribution of bid documents -
(4) Respond to questions from bidders and issue any appropriate addenda.
_ (5j Work-with. the city to select the most responsible bidder after'bid opening.
We will work with the city as needed until the contract. is awarded and
.signed. -
Task. #4 -Construction Management Services
` (1) Overseeing the work of contractor and presiding over regular constru"ction
- meetings to address questions and issues that arise as well as reviewing
the work as it related to the budget and schedule.
(2) Review monthly .payment application requests. from the contractor.
(3) The.architect/project manager will maintain constant communication with-
the city officials to keep them informed of the construction progress and
any issues that may arise. during the construction.
(4) The architect/project manager will maintain job site construction meeting
agendas and minutes of regular construction meetings.
- (5) Review and approve all shop drawings, respond to :BFI's, .review '
submittal logs, and review and approve change orders. .
- (6) Complete project close out process to include review of final as-builts,
preparation of final as-builts in AutoCAD format, review of warranty and
- - operating and maintenance manuals, and final permit close out
. - = documentation.
Schedule B
Cify of Miami Beach Par 3 Golf Course.
Compensation Fee Schedule
Project Item
. Phase 1 -Conceptual Design
Phase 11 -Construction Documents {30%)
Phase II1-Construction Documents
(60%, 90%, 100%)
- Bid Award
Construction Management Services
. , ~ Tota! fee -
Reimbursable Expenses
Travel 25 trips/average cost $1,100%trip
Survey -Initial site survey and' As-built survey
Geotech Testing
Groundwater monitoring wells (DERM) ,
Photo; Reproduction, Plans and Printing
. - Total Expenses for Reimbursable
Not. to Exceed
Total Cost
Fee
$50,000.00
$75,000.00
$115,000,00
$9,500.00
$45,000.00
$294, 500.00
$27;500.00
$36,000.00
$4,500.00 `
$22,100..00
$2,500.Q0
$92,600.00
$387,100.00
J
^ V
. w rn
c
~ ~~
Q a
U W ~
`o
O
a Za
gW~°'
_~
~~
w~a
.cn0
~ ~ V
~. ~~
V Ow o
U U c
~ W>
.. - MMQ~ ~'w~p
W ~ U` (~ ~
... .~
C :,
~.
~ .
U
U
d
d
t
V
,.
M
a-
Z
a~
w -
a
N
LL .•
~a~_a~ a~o~m
E ~c c io pp u- }'~ ~
Z a~i U ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~
~iCf Vd~ m afnW,'
~ Y N N Q";E Y Y
aF-a.oawU~~
0 0 0 O
~
~
O ~ ~0 0O co o
~ O ~ N O ~ ~ p O ti ~ ~ O)
~ N f~
~ .. ~ O M Ui N ai M Vi ~ M V ~ °r° CV ~ ~
E!)
EH ~ M
fR
_ U ~ ~ dM~} ~ ~ ~ r
EA
~ ~
(6 ,_ ~
~
F-
U Q ~ ~ ff? EA EH EA EA EA
o ~
'
~ ~ ~
O ~ o
°
rn'~ ~ O p ~ M a~ ~ o ~ ° ~ o ~
a~
m ~
~
F-.
°
o
0
0
0
0
~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O U ~ ~
J Q E9 fA EA EA ' Ef)
O
N ~
~
O ~
~ H
~
~ O
O
~ O
O
~ O
O O
O
O
O
U a
0
EA
~
U N Ef~ O ~
:in ¢
U ~ ~ ~ ff}
N
ca
'"
U
a~
a~
Q
a . Q
~
~
~
?
U
~
°o
~
O
o
~
~
°o
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
~n
N
y U c- r ~ ~ ~ M r' _ h ~
(n 7 b} ~ U ~, pp ~ ~ ~ 00
W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
- 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
O
O
O
O ~
f~ o
(O ~n
A ~
N ~n
N
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ O ~ O N. ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ O. U Ef3
n ~ ~ ~ EA ~
~
_
~
~
o
0
0
0
0
0
" w_ ~ ~
O J c
a ai
0
'~~ ~ ~ O N ~ N ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ H Q C U J
`
~
~
U
~
~
~
v
~
~
O ~ cu w B
~
axi Q
~
a ~ -° a
O a
=m
°
_
~ ~ ~ _
g
,~
~Q ~
~ ~,
Q w
o ~
~ ~
~
o
o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
'
- ~. N
U
N ~
~ a
~
~.
~
o
_ a
~
~
~ ~
o
c '~ N
.. .Om ~
m' ~ ~
rn
~ Z
~
N 3
~
O .s
~ E
.~
~.
Y .
. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~- ~ a o ~ ~ Q J ~ f~E ~ ~ ~ ~ N
~
~ ~'
U.. °
M coo ~
N 3
Q ~
O ~ .c
~ O l0 Q
„~-. .~
'~ y
N ~
~ ~
vi ~
C
- _ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ .
N - s 3 ~ a
N _ E
~ N N C m
L
~ L L N
O Z3 U ..
~ ~ n ~ 7 °
a a m F-- c C C a i-
I--
U
W
O
a
,. F-
C7
O. .
.Z
LL
,:,
w w
~
~ . Z;.
a ~~
... Z w
"'~
c~
~
~
MM
{
W -
~~
~_
.~
O
~.
U-
U .
~ c+>
V
. ~
~ _ a
°~
'Z
m
W
~~ _~ a
' ~ c ~ ~
LL
• ~ ~. ~ N T N O ~ (0
o `mmLL•io~~
~
v
Z~ U m'
m ~ m ~
.
~
'~
~o ~a ~ m Qinw
N Y ~ N G~ ~ Y Y
~ fQ ~ ti
~
R
O
N
f6
araoawc~~f-
c~ ~
j
~ C,•)
~ '
p O
~ O
~ to
~ ~
~
~ O
N ~
~.
~ ~ ~ M p ~
= EA ~ EF} fA ffl ~ 69 ~.
V .S
N ~
~ H'.
O
~,
p
~
~
~
M
p
~.
r'
p
~
p
0
0
' ~
U Q O
2
U Ef) W3 ~ EA 6q 64 d}
•
~ ~
~
~ O
U d9 d} fH EA Efl EA
2
U
~ ~ ~
~n o
~
o 0
o
o 0
o
~n 0
'n
o 0
o
co 0
o
~ ~ N r., ~ p O p N ~ ~ ~> r- ~
~ a ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~
O o co ~n o o
CJ ~ O O , ~ ~ ~ ~ O O N ~ ~ ~
.~ (n = U 69 fH ~ to
N
(0 '
U'
m
a~
O
' m
~
~
~
~
M
O
~
o
~
N
0
N
~
0
~
~
~
0
~
O
N
0
N
~
0
oN0
~ w ~ p
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ N rS aO CV ~ v
W ' ~ » ~ t~ to
~
N
?
~
~ en o
O o
O ~n
N o
~ o
O ,
~
N ~ O
~ O O
O ~ ~
N ~ O
~ N O
~ O
d 69 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
F-
Q. ° o ~ ~ o
~ °
o
~ °
o
~ °
0 0 °
0 U
~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ r ~ ~ ~ 00 N ~
O
~o ~ _ U ER N
~ N
~ N
~ ~y ~
~
g
o
`
m o
o
o
n.
<-
Y ca
7
~ o
p ~
_
m ~ n a
M ~ Q
~ U ca
°~ o
U
_ _ ~
L
L
L
N ~.
.~
O
a a a C7 m U
,~:
~~
._____.~ .... 3. _..~..._...,_.__._..~.. .._ _._.__ _ . ...:._.__..__. _. _.. ._
~. _ ~ n _ _ .. __ ._ ., .._.~
~; s
$.- _ a.
s ~i?: ~
a
f~ ._... :....:._...__... __... .:...... .__._.. ........_.,,. ....__ .......... ,. ... .._... .. ._
~ .. ..
9 ~
zF~: ~ -<
s s
LL~
.r a
1a
r ~
s~':
~,„;
_,......_,_ r
8
~,
a s
~. ~ S .R
i
€04 t ~, d a
YY `
ab ..._.:.._...._....._ .. .. ~ a i
i
3 ~ - , ~ j
z
s
! ~tms 4
•
a ~ 8; ~ _ e
_ -~
o a
&.
:~
a Ifs
:ff S ~" P $
........ _._..__ _. .,s
,< _ _ i.
S. i.
6i, I $
~e
~3 'f
rv .. .............: ..~......_, .. ...,.. ._.__.... .___.........._..._...,. .... ....... ,.. .........._.
~ 9 ._. ,.._._.....-.-,-. .
µ
= m s ~ .
a r 7
~ ~,
• C ~ O
m ~ a
~,n c
_ ~. ~ ! 9.
m
. a
v
o .._ _ ._
`„' ~~ ~ :S 5 "m ~~ - i a S T ~ a S 1 ,a I... c i5 a~ a s a ~ i i a
4 .1~Y
I
a
s ~ ~ ~ 's is ~ f ~ i € i ( a a 1 m 'a a ~a ~
LL
e e _
I ~.. _ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ '
-~ ~ _ - - _
~ ~ I ~
~ ~ s I~' ~ s s . s s ~ ~ ~ a - ~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . s s ~ I ~a s a ~ a ~"s ~
{ ~ ~ I x
t ~~ _ f i i
a s s .a t ~~~; a x is e e c ~~. c } :
~ ~ I I :9.. ~ ~.$_...~. s ~ ~~ is. -- ~ `~ - e -1-- }. - Ir c 5 ~~ .,.~,. ~ ~n"ls SW, _ I :
I 3
~^
a a
E° ~rv a L
~ } ~ ry_, i
~ _ ..1..
IC { fr
f ~ ~ CS ~ ~ I€ ~ 3 t ~ t I ~ ~ A
' '~ ,~ } ~ !~ f~ 1 ~ I ~ Ig _ ( III IU i ~ f ~ { s
~ 9 j5 ~ l~ ~ S ~ F ( l Ie ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i lu ~ $
~ ~t i ~2 I2 '~ ~ ~~ 8 6 (o g B Ig 2 ~s 3 )8 ~ 8 ~ I~ ~
ie iI P ~ ~ ~~ (~ ~ e 2 s ~ ~ E F .'~ ! ~ !.§ ~ ~€ ~ c 3 ,~ i a ~ g I~ "~ 8 s ~~ 3 ,$ ~ $ n
11
Y ~
e
0 19._f9 PI ~ I'1 CI I'I 'PI ~ :(~ ~ I€I 1€1 I'I (p1. _ PI [9 ~ ~ I'1 'PI CI I'I I91 I'I i`I :f I._I'I I'I I9 RJ i'I ~{9 19~ I'I i9 PI ,p~f;i ~S
_. I
... ...~.. .._...~t . ~
_ ~~ r m. i I~ m.
R R R ~ R-,..
o m °' f` l~ z ~ _ m m m ~" I ~" t ~x ~, a a ~.~ ~ -~ I ~ i I~ ~° ~~~~i ~o