2011-27601 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -27601
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, APPROVING, FOLLOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING, THE
CITY'S PLANNED USE OF NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM 3 (NSP3)
FUNDING UNDER THE DODD -FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER
PROTECTION ACT AND AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,475,088 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT PROPERTY;
APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S FY 2008 -2012
CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY 2010 -11 ACTION PLAN TO ALLOCATE $1,327,579 OF
THE NSP3 FUNDS TO THE CITY'S SUBRECIPIENT, MIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (MBCDC), FOR THE REHABILITATION OF PHASE 1
OF THE LONDON HOUSE APARTMENTS LOCATED AT 1965 WASHINGTON AVENUE;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ANY AND ALL NECESSARY RELATED
DOCUMENTS.
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2010, the City of Miami Beach received the U.S. Department of Housing
& Urban Development Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for Neighborhood
Stabilization Program Formula Grants, originally established under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act
of 2008 (the HUD Notice), which outlines the allocation amounts, methods, and program requirements for the
third round of Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding (NSP3); and
WHEREAS, under NSP3, which is funded under the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, the City of Miami Beach will be granted $1,475,088 on a formula basis; and
WHEREAS, HUD has instructed entitlement communities receiving NSP3 funds to immediately begin
to prepare and submit their action plan substantial amendments in accordance with the HUD Notice by March
1, 2011, which should outline how the City will carry out its NSP3 activities; and
WHEREAS, NSP3 grantees are required to follow their citizen participation process as described in
the Consolidated Plan, but modified by the NSP3 Notice, in order to ensure that the public is aware of the
NSP3 substantial amendment; and
WHEREAS, HUD has established five eligible uses for NSP3 funds to be determined by each
community; and
WHEREAS, during the research and analysis period, and in light of the tight expenditure timelines of
the program, Strategy E, Redevelopment of Demolished or Vacant Properties as affordable housing, was
selected as the best option; and
WHEREAS, the NSP3 Mapping Tool was also used to identify vacant buildings within the areas of
greatest need; and
WHEREAS, the London House Apartments, located at 1965 -1975 Washington Avenue, purchased by
Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency (MBCDC) in 2007 with funds from the City of Miami Beach
Redevelopment Agency, is a vacant structure eligible for affordable housing, which requires reconfiguration to
meet HUD's minimum requirements for square footage for studios; and
WHEREAS, MBCDC has been actively working to identify funding for the rehabilitation of the building
and proposes, in two phases, to reduce the ten (10) existing apartment units to six larger units to increase the
square footage to provide one and three bedroom apartments to serve low- income work force household
families meeting the national and local objective of providing larger housing units to serve low income
households; and
WHEREAS, Phase 1 of the rehabilitation of the London House Apartments will include the exterior
rehabilitation of the original historic elements, and will promote both energy efficiency and construction
efficiency; and
WHEREAS, the use of NSP3 funds to rehabilitate Phase 1 of the London House Apartments will allow
this vacant property to be redeveloped into affordable housing units that can accommodate families which has
been identified as a priority in the City's Consolidated Plan; and
WHEREAS, on Wednesday, December 29, 2010, a copy of the Substantial Amendment was posted
on the Office of Real Estate, Housing and Community Development website in accordance with HUD
requirements and on Thursday, December 30, 2010, a notice of public hearing was published in The Miami
Herald; and
WHEREAS, the Administration requests authorization to submit a substantial amendment to HUD
describing the use of NSP3 funds allocating $1,327,579 to the City's subrecipient, Miami Beach Community
• Development Corporation, for rehabilitation of Phase 1 of the London House Apartments located at 1965
Washington Avenue; authorization for the City Manager to sign any and all necessary related applications and
documents; and to further authorize the appropriation of federal funds in the amount of $1,475,088.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission of Miami Beach, Florida hereby approve
the City's planned use of Neighborhood Stabilization Program 3 (NSP3) funding under the Dodd -Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and authorize the appropriation of federal funds in the amount of
$1,475,088 for the redevelopment of vacant property; approve a substantial amendment to the City's FY 2008-
2012 Consolidated Plan and FY 2010 -11 Action Plan to allocate $1,327,579 of the (NSP3) funds to the City's
subrecipient, Miami Beach Community Development Corporation (MBCDC) for the rehabilitation of Phase 1 of
the London House Apartments located at 1965 Washington Avenue; and authorizing the City Manager to sign
any and all necessary related documents.
Passed and adopted this 'P day of F-e hr1464 r , 2011.
Aci . x‘y_. -■
MA OR
Matti Herrera Bower
ATT ST:
CITY CLERK APPROVED A$ TO
Robert Parcher FORM & GUAGE
& FO •� ECUTION
�t i
CitZ torney Dat
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of Miami Beach, Florida, Approving, Following a duly Noticed Public
Hearing, The City's Planned Use Of Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP3) Funding In The Amount Of $1,475,088 For
The Redevelopment Of Vacant Property; Approving A Substantial Amendment To The City's FY 2008 -2012 Consolidated
Plan And FY 2010 -11 Action Plan To Allocate $1,327,579 Of The (NSP3) Funds To The City's Subrecipient, Miami Beach
Community Development Corporation (MBCDC) For The Rehabilitation Of Phase 1 Of The London House Apartments
Located At 1965 Washington Avenue; Authorizing The City Manager To Sign Any And All Necessary Related Documents;
Further Authorizing The Appropriation Of Federal Funds In The Amount Of $1,475,088.
Key Intended Outcome Supported:
Increase access to workforce or affordable housing.
Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Based on the 2009 Customer Satisfaction Survey, 17.5% of businesses
feel that lack of workforce housing is one of their most important challenges.
Issue:
Shall the City Commission approve the submission of a Substantial Amendment for the use of any allocated NSP3 funds
from US HUD for MBCDC's London House Apartments Phase 1 to provide affordable housing for families, authorize the City
Manager to submit and execute any necessary documents and appropriate NSP3 funds for this purpose?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
On October 20, 2010, the City received the HUD Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Formula Grants, which outlines the allocation amounts, methods, and program
requirements for the third round of Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding (NSP3). The City will be granted $1,475,088
on a formula basis. HUD has instructed entitlement communities receiving NSP3 funds to submit their Substantial
Amendments (Plan) in accordance with the HUD Notice by March 1, 2011.
HUD established five eligible uses for NSP3 funds and recipients of NSP3 funds are required to meet HUD - outlined goals
and objectives by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity, principally for persons
of low- and moderate - income. Each community must determine a strategy for the use of the funds within these eligibility
categories. During the research and analysis period for the possible uses of NSP3 funds, and in light of the NSP3 required
expenditure timelines, it was determined that the use of NSP3 funds for the rehabilitation of Phase 1 of the London House
Apartments, would be most feasible. The property consists of two- buildings: one ten unit building with two stories located at
1965 Washington Avenue; and another 44 -unit building with three stories located at 1975 Washington Avenue. As currently
configured, the smaller ten -unit building does not meet HUD's minimum requirements for square footage for studios. The
London House Apartments was purchased by MBCDC in 2007 with funds from the City of Miami Beach Redevelopment
Agency with the understanding that MBCDC would leverage state and federal funds to rehabilitate the property as affordable
housing, which is consistent with the City Center Redevelopment Plan. The acquisition transaction required a restrictive
covenant requiring a 30 -year affordability period. MBCDC has since been actively working to identify funding for the
rehabilitation of the building.
NSP3 funding is recommended for the London House Apartments Phase 1, which may be utilized to redevelop the ten unit
building into six larger units to increase the square footage in order to serve low- income work force households or families,
which meets national and local objectives. The ten units will be reconfigured into four three - bedroom units and two studio
apartments. Other rehabilitation work would also be completed, including energy efficiency initiatives.
In order the meet the NSP3 objectives and timelines, the Administration requests authorization to submit a Substantial
Amendment to HUD describing the use of NSP3 funds allocating $1,327,579 to the City's subrecipient, MBCDC, for
rehabilitation of Phase 1 of the London House Apartments located at 1965 Washington Avenue.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account
Funds: 1
OBPI Total
Financial Impact Summary: N/A
City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:
Anna Parekh x:7260
Sign -Offs:
artment Director , c: = t to s� Ci Hager
AP It HF I , � ! G
MIAMI BEACH AGEND ITEM P 1
w. MIAMI 2 'q' I
t-A MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the Ci y Commission
FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager
DATE: February 9, 2011
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MP4YOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, APPROVING, FOLLOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING, THE
CITY'S PLANNED USE OF NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM 3 (NSP3)
FUNDING UNDER DODD -FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER
PROTECTION ACT AND AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,475,088 FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF VACANT
PROPERTY; APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S FY 2008-
2012 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY 2010 -11 ACTION PLAN TO ALLOCATE
$1,327,579 OF THE (NSP3) FUNDS TO THE CITY'S SUBRECIPIENT, MIAMI BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (MBCDC), FOR THE REHABILITATION
OF PHASE 1 OF THE LONDON HOUSE APARTMENTS LOCATED AT 1965
WASHINGTON AVENUE; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ANY
AND ALL NECESSARY RELATED DOCUMENTS.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
BACKGROUND
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 provided for the development of certain programs
to help stabilize neighborhoods and communities impacted by the high rate of foreclosures. With a
goal of reducing blight created from abandoned properties, the first round of the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program 1 (NSP1) allocated funds through a formula basis to help communities
address this issue. Each community developed a strategy to use the funds within specifically
delineated program areas. The City chose to allocate its formula funds (provided to the City via the
State) for the purchase of foreclosed multi - family housing.
A total of $9.3 million was allocated to the City under NSP1, allowing for the purchase of three
foreclosed buildings. The three buildings will provide 60 units of affordable housing, including nine
large units for families.
ANALYSIS
On October 20, 2010, the City of Miami Beach received the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban
Development (HUD) Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for Neighborhood
Stabilization Program Formula Grants, originally established under the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008 (the HUD Notice). The HUD Notice outlines the allocation amounts, methods,
and program requirements for the third round of Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding
(NSP3). Under NSP3, which is funded under the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, the City of Miami Beach will be granted $1,475,088 on a formula basis. Recipients of
City Commission Memorandum
NSP3
February 9, 2011
Page 2
NSP3 funds are required to meet HUD - outlined goals and objectives by providing decent housing, a
suitable living environment, and economic opportunity, principally for persons of low- and moderate -
income.
HUD has instructed entitlement communities receiving NSP3 funds to immediately begin to prepare
and submit their action plan substantial amendments (Plan) in accordance with the HUD Notice by
March 1, 2011. As you are aware, the City prepares and submits (following a public comment
period and Commission approval) an action plan that delineates the City's approach to addressing
HUD- eligible activities. As this is a new source of funding, an amendment to the action plan
submitted by the City is required. The City's Ian is outline how the City will carry tt y e C ty equ ed. e C ty s P to out i t o y y out
the NSP3 activities in the context of a comprehensive plan for the community's vision of how it can
make its neighborhoods not only more stable, but also more sustainable, inclusive, competitive, and
integrated into the overall metropolitan fabric, including access to transit, affordable housing,
employers, and services.
HUD has determined that for NSP3, the states and local governments with the greatest need for
neighborhood stabilization funding are those communities that have high numbers of foreclosed
and /or vacant properties in the neighborhoods with the highest concentrations of foreclosures,
delinquent loans, and subprime loans. The net result is that these funds are highly targeted to
communities with the most severe neighborhood problems associated with the foreclosure crisis.
Under NSP3, and unlike under NSP1, grantees must use the HUD "Foreclosure Need Website" to
submit to HUD the locations of its NSP3 areas of greatest need. On this site, HUD provides
estimates of foreclosure need and a foreclosure - related needs score at the Census Tract level.
NSP3 grantees are also required to follow their citizen participation process as described in the
Consolidated Plan, but modified by the NSP3 Notice, in order to ensure that the public is aware of
the NSP3 substantial amendment. For NSP3 the substantial amendment must be published and
posted on the jurisdiction's website for no less than 15 calendar days for public comment, as
opposed to the usual 30 day public comment period. An appendix with a summary of all of the public
comments is attached to the substantial amendment that is ultimately submitted to HUD for funding
review and approval.
HUD has established five eligible uses for NSP3 funds, as follows:
(A) Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon
homes and residential properties, including such mechanisms as soft- seconds, loan loss
reserves, and shared - equity loans for low- and moderate - income homebuyers.
(B) Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or
foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or re- develop such homes and properties.
(C) Establish and operate land banks for homes and residential properties that have been
foreclosed upon.
(D) Demolish blighted structures
(E) Redevelop demolished or vacant properties as housing.
Needless to say, each community must determine a strategy for the use of the funds within these
eligibility categories. During the research and analysis period for the possible uses of NSP3 funds,
and in light of the tight expenditure timelines for the program, Strategy E was selected as the best
option. The NSP3 Mapping Tool was also used to identify vacant buildings within the areas of
greatest need.
City Commission Memorandum
NSP3
February 9, 2011
Page 3
PROPOSED NSP3 PROJECT
The London House Apartments, a contributing structure in the National Register Miami Beach
Architectural District, located at 1965 -1975 Washington Avenue, consists of two buildings: one ten -
unit building with two stories (1965 Washington Avenue); and another 44 -unit building with three
stories (1975 Washington Avenue). The buildings are connected by a walkway and are located in
the Museum Historic District. The property was built in 1948 as a Miami Modern apartment hotel.
The buildings were purchased by Miami Beach Community Development Corporation (MBCDC) in
2007 with funds from the City of Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency with the understanding that
MBCDC would leverage state and federal funds to rehabilitate the property as affordable housing
which is consistent with the City Center Redevelopment Plan. The acquisition transaction included a
Covenant Running with the Land requiring an affordability period of at least thirty (30) years
requiring MBCDC to maintain the property as affordable housing. MBCDC has since been actively
working to identify funding for the rehabilitation of the building.
As currently configured, the smaller ten -unit building at 1965 Washington Ave. does not meet HUD's
minimum requirements for square footage for studios. If approved and as recommended, NSP3
eligible strategy (E) and the available NSP3 funds may be utilized to redevelop those ten units at the
London House Apartments into six larger units to increase the square footage in order to serve low -
income work force households or families, which meets national and local objectives. The ten units
will be re- configured into four three - bedroom units and two studio apartments.
Additionally, rehabilitation of the London House Phase 1 will include the exterior rehabilitation of the
original historic elements, such as the facade, the complete ground level terrace with ornaments, the
second floor open walkway and new exterior windows and doors. The project will promote both
energy efficiency and construction efficiency. Furthermore, the project will use insulated window
glazing and gas hydronic heat to further promote conservation. All exterior walls and ceilings will be
insulated to meet or exceed code requirements and interior tenant separation walls will receive
sound insulation. Other areas in which energy conscious design features will be implemented are:
water closets at all toilets will be 1.6 gallon fixtures. The faucets will have built -in flow restrictors to
lower water consumption. Energy efficient light fixtures and corresponding bulbs will be used as
much as possible as well as energy efficient appliances.
Pursuant to HUD regulations, a Substantial Amendment with the above - described strategy and plan
(Exhibit "A" attached hereto) was posted on the Office of Real Estate, Housing and Community
Development's website on Wednesday, December 29, 2010, for public comment. On Thursday,
December 30, 2010, a notice of public hearing was published in The Miami Herald (Exhibit "B" also
attached hereto). The public comment period ended on January 18, 2011. No public comments
were received.
CONCLUSION
The Administration requests authorization to submit the proposed Substantial Amendment to HUD
describing the use of NSP3 funds and allocating $1,327,579 to the City's subrecipient, Miami Beach
Community Development Corporation, for rehabilitation of the London House Apartments located at
1965 Washington Avenue; authorization for the City Manager to sign any and all necessary related
applications and documents and to authorize the appropriation of federal funds in the amount of
$1,475,088.
JMG /HMF /''
T: AGENDA\2011\2 -09 -11 \NSP3 Substantial Amendment Memo.docx
EXHIBIT "A"
DRAFT 3, JANUARY 18, 2011
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM 3
SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2008 -2012
CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY 2010 -11 ACTION
PLAN
DUE DATE: MARCH 1, 2011
NAME OF APPLICANT:
M I AM I B E AC H
TO:
U. 5. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
REGION IV, MIAMI FIELD OFFICE
BRICKELL PLAZA FEDERAL BUILDLING
909 SE FIRST AVENUE, RM. 500
MIAMI, FL 33131 -3042
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
1. NSP3 Grantee Information
NSP3 Program Administrator Contact Information
Organization City of Miami Beach
Name (Last, First) Director: Parekh, Anna
Email Address AnnaParekh @miamibeachfl.gov
Phone Number 305 - 673 -7260
Mailing Address 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139
2. Areas of Greatest Need
Map Submission
The map generated at the HUD NSP3 Mapping Tool for Preparing Action Plan website is included as an
attachment. (See Attachment 1)
Data Sources Used to Determine Areas of Greatest Need
Describe the data sources used to determine the areas of greatest need.
Response:
Citywide, extremely low, very low and low- income residents accounted for 21,504 households in 2000.
According to the US Census, over half the residents in half of the City's census tracts earned Tess than 80
percent of the area median income. These target areas, based on Census 2000 data contain census
tract /block groups that have a concentration of low -to- moderate income households. This means more
than 50% of the households have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income. The census
tracts with low -to- moderate income concentration include 39.07, 42.02, 44.02, 39.01, 39.05, 45.00, and
44.01. Also, in 2000, two - thirds of the census tracts in Miami Beach were minority- majority
neighborhoods (Census Tracts 39.05, 39.01, 39.07, 44.02, 42.02, 44.01, 43.00, and 41.01). All with the
exception of two of the low income and racially concentrated Census Tract /block Groups overlap.
Determination of Areas of Greatest Need and Applicable Tiers
Describe how the areas of greatest need were established and whether a tiered approach is being
utilized to determine the distribution of funding.
Response:
The northern and southern part (North Beach and South Beach) of Miami Beach contain the highest
concentration of low and moderate income persons in the City. The selected project is in located in an
area where 60 -79% of the residents are of low and moderate incomes. The project scores a 17 on the
NSP3 Mapping Tool.
The City of Miami Beach's residential composition is unique compared to other communities in Florida
in that the vast majority of the residences in the city are found in condominium buildings and multi-
family apartment buildings. Of the 65,583 residential units in Miami Beach, 40,825 or 62% are in
condominiums, 19,202 or 29% are in rental apartments, while only 5,556 or 8% are comprised of single
family homes. Not surprisingly, the largest numbers of foreclosed homes are condominium units.
Page 2 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
In considering the City's "greatest need" and keeping in mind the prospective NSP goal of home-
ownership, we found that the only affordable homeownership units given NSP income guidelines would
be condominiums.
Unlike ownership of a single family home, inherent in owning a condominium unit in today's real estate
market is the risk of having the new owner face unanticipated condo fees and /or assessments arising
from other foreclosed units in the building or other owners defaulting on their condominium dues.
Therefore, Miami Beach's strategy is to use its NSP funding, both its regular allocation and NSPLI, to
rehabilitate vacant multi - family buildings for rental housing to income - qualified households.
In 1992, The City of Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency outlined District 1, known as the City Center
Redevelopment Area, as an area of slum and blight located in our area of greatest need in South Beach.
Since then, The City, The State, and the County have worked together to restructure and bring
improvements to the neighborhood. The London House Apartments is a vacant, historic apartment
complex, located within District 1, which was acquired by our local non - profit developer, Miami Beach
Community Development Corporation. The London House Apartments is in much need of rehabilitation
and safety upgrades that have not occurred due to gaps in funding. Completion of Phase 1 of the
London House Apartments will create six units for affordable housing to our local workforce, including
four units for families.
3. Definitions and Descriptions
Definitions
Term Definition
Blighted Structure A structure that exhibits objectively determinable signs of deterioration
sufficient to constitute a threat to human health, safety, and public welfare.
Affordable Rents Rents shall be set according to HOME rental requirements and therefore the
maximum HOME rents that can be charge are the lesser of: (1) the fair
market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as
established by HUD under 24 CFR Part 888.111; or (2) a rent that does not
exceed 30 percent of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income
equal 65 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD,
with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits
provided by HUD will include average occupancy per unit and adjusted
income assumptions. The rent must comply with the published HUD income
limits per household size.
Descriptions
Term Definition
Long -Term Affordability The sub - recipient shall maintain the Premises as a fifty (50) year affordable
residential rental apartment building for a term pursuant to an existing
Restrictive Covenant. The affordability period shall be incorporated into the
sub - recipient NSP3 agreement.
Page 3 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
Housing Rehabilitation All gut rehabilitation of residential buildings up to three stores shall be
Standards designed to meet the standard for Energy Star Qualified Homes.
Replacement of obsolete products and appliances shall meet Energy Star
labeled products. Water efficient toilets, showers, and faucets, such as those
with the WaterSense label, must be installed. Improvements shall mitigate
the impact of disasters. Minimum construction standards shall comply with
the Florida Building Code, latest edition. Rehabilitation shall also include
compliance with Lead -based paint abatement.
4. Low - Income Targeting
Low- Income Set -Aside Amount
Enter the low- income set -aside percentage in the first field. The field for total funds set aside will
populate based on the percentage entered in the first field and the total NSP3 grant.
Identify the estimated amount of funds appropriated or otherwise made available under the NSP3 to
be used to provide housing for individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of
area median income.
Response:
Total low- income set -aside percentage (must be no less than 25 percent): 25.00%
Total funds set aside for low- income individuals = 25% of $1,475,088 = $368, 772
Meeting Low - Income Target
Provide a summary that describes the manner in which the low- income targeting goals will be met.
Response:
The sub - recipient shall advertise available affordable housing units. Applications will be required to
show total income earned for the household. Beneficiaries will be selected on a lottery basis.
5. Acquisition and Relocation
Demolition or Conversion of LMI Units
The London House Apartments -Phase 1, is currently vacant and has no tenants. Relocation requirements
do not apply to this project.
Does the grantee intend to demolish or convert any low- and moderate - income Yes. The sub -
dwelling units (i.e., 5 80% of area median income)? recipient will
convert 10
empty units into
6 larger units to
house families.
Page 4 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
If yes, fill in the table below.
Question Number of Units
The number of low- and moderate - income dwelling units — i.e., <_ 80% of area
median income — reasonably expected to be demolished or converted as a direct
result of NSP- assisted activities. 10
The number of NSP affordable housing units made available to low- , moderate -, 6
and middle- income households — i.e., <_ 120% of area median income — reasonably
expected to be produced by activity and income level as provided for in DRGR, by
each NSP activity providing such housing (including a proposed time schedule for
commencement and completion).
The number of dwelling units reasonably expected to be made available for 2
households whose income does not exceed 50 percent of area median income.
6. Public Comment
Citizen Participation Plan
Briefly describe how the grantee followed its citizen participation plan regarding this proposed
substantial amendment or abbreviated plan.
Response:
The City of Miami Beach has posted an advertisement of the Notice of a Fifteen Day Public
Comment Period and Public Hearing For A Substantial Amendment to the City's FY 2008 -2013
Consolidated Plan in the local newspaper on Thursday, December 30, 2010. Citizens will be
encouraged to review the amendment before January 17, 2011 and to attend the City Commission
meeting on Wednesday January 19, 2011. The Substantial Amendment posted on the City's website
on Wednesday, December 29, 2010. The Office of Real Estate, Housing and Community
Development will accept comments on the amendment during a 15 -day comment period ending on
Tuesday, January 18, 2011.
Summary of Public Comments Received.
The summary of public comments received is included as an attachment. (See Attachment 2)
7. NSP Information by Activity
Enter each activity name and fill in the corresponding information. If you have fewer than seven
activities, please delete any extra activity fields. (For example, if you have three activities, you should
delete the tables labeled "Activity Number 4," "Activity Number 5," "Activity Number 6," and "Activity
Number 7." If you are unsure how to delete a table, see the instructions above.
The field labeled "Total Budget for Activity" will populate based on the figures entered in the fields
above it.
Consult the NSP3 Program Design Guidebook for guidance on completing the "Performance Measures"
component of the activity tables below.
Page 5 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
The City of Miami Beach will be targeting one activity.
Activity Number 1
The London House Apartments Multi - Family Rehabilitation -
Activity Name Phase 1
Select all that apply:
❑ Eligible Use A: Financing Mechanisms
❑ Eligible Use B: Acquisition and Rehabilitation
Uses ❑ Eligible Use C: Land Banking
❑ Eligible Use D: Demolition
X Eligible Use E: Redevelopment
CDBG Activity or
Activities 14B Rehab; Multi -Unit Residential LMH
Low Mod Housing Activities. To provide permanent residential structures will
be occupied by LMI households. At least 51 % of the units will be occupied by
National Objective LMMI households. And at least 25% will be occupied by Low and Very Low
Median Income households.
Rehabilitation of a vacant building that will result in six units of multi - family
rental housing. Renters will be selected on a lottery basis to benefit low and
moderate income residents who work in the community. The building will
provide four three bedroom units and two efficiencies. The City shall request
the subrecipient to maintain the rents affordable for the duration of the
Activity Description affordability period described herein. The City will work with the sub -
recipient to the maximum extent possible to provide for the hiring of
employees who reside in the vicinity of the project or contract with small
businesses that are owned and operated by persons residing in the vicinity of
the project .
The London House is located at 1695 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, FL
33139. Tract no. 42.02 which is an area of 60 -79% LMI and a score of 17 on
Location Description the MSP3 Mapping Tool. The London House is a contributing structure in the
National Register Miami Beach Architectural District.
Source of Funding , Dollar Amount
Budget 1 NSP3 $1,327,579.00
Miami Dade OCED CDBG FY2009 $ 175,300.00
US HUD EDI $ 102,592.88
Total Budget for Activity $1,605,471.88
10 studios will be converted to four 3- bedroom units and two efficiencies.
Performance Measures This is an excellent opportunity to provide housing for families with children.
Projected Start Date May 1, 2011
Projected End Date April 30, 2012
Responsible Miami Beach Community Development
Name
Organization Corporation
Page 6 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
Location 945 Pennsylvania Avenue, 2 " floor
Miami Beach, FL 33139
Administrator Contact Info Roberto Datorre, President
Administrator Contact Info 305 - 538 -0090
roberto @miamibeachcdc.org
8. Certifications
Certifications for State and Entitlement Communities
(1) Affirmatively furthering fair housing. The jurisdiction certifies that it will affirmatively further fair
housing, which means that it will conduct an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice
within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified
through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard.
(2) Anti - displacement and relocation plan. The applicant certifies that it has in effect and is following a
residential anti - displacement and relocation assistance plan.
(3) Anti - lobbying. The jurisdiction must submit a certification with regard to compliance with
restrictions on lobbying required by 24 CFR part 87, together with disclosure forms, if required by that
part.
(4) Authority of jurisdiction. The jurisdiction certifies that the consolidated plan or abbreviated plan, as
applicable, is authorized under state and local law (as applicable) and that the jurisdiction possesses the
legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable
HUD regulations and other program requirements.
(5) Consistency with plan. The jurisdiction certifies that the housing activities to be undertaken with NSP
funds are consistent with its consolidated plan or abbreviated plan, as applicable.
(6) Acquisition and relocation. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with the acquisition and
relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24, except as those
provisions are modified by the notice for the NSP program published by HUD.
(7) Section 3. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135.
(8) Citizen participation. The jurisdiction certifies that it is in full compliance and following a detailed
citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of Sections 24 CFR 91.105 or 91.115, as
modified by NSP requirements.
(9) Following a plan. The jurisdiction certifies it is following a current consolidated plan (or
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. [Only States and
entitlement jurisdictions use this certification.]
Page 7 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
(10) Use of funds. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act and Title XII of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 by spending 50 percent of its grant funds within 2 years, and spending 100 percent within 3
years, of receipt of the grant.
(11) The jurisdiction certifies:
a. that all of the NSP funds made available to it will be used with respect to individuals and families
whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of area median income; and
b. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted
with CDBG funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds, by assessing any amount against
properties owned and occupied by persons of low- and moderate - income, including any fee
charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements.
However, if NSP funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment attributable to the
capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with NSP funds) financed from other
revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to
the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. In addition, with respect
to properties owned and occupied by moderate - income (but not low- income) families, an
assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public
improvements financed by a source other than NSP funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks
NSP or CDBG funds to cover the assessment.
(12) Excessive force. The jurisdiction certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing:
a. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
b. A policy of enforcing applicable state and local laws against physically barring entrance to, or
exit from, a facility or location that is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations
within its jurisdiction.
(13) Compliance with anti- discrimination laws. The jurisdiction certifies that the NSP grant will be
conducted and administered in conformity with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d),
the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 - 3619), and implementing regulations.
(14) Compliance with lead -based paint procedures. The jurisdiction certifies that its activities
concerning lead -based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of
this title.
(15) Compliance with laws. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with applicable laws.
(16) Vicinity hiring. The jurisdiction certifies that it will, to the maximum extent feasible, provide for
hiring of employees that reside in the vicinity of NSP3 funded projects or contract with small businesses
that are owned and operated by persons residing in the vicinity of NSP3 projects.
Page 8 of 13
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
(17) Development of affordable rental housing. The jurisdiction certifies that it will be abide by the
procedures described in its NSP3 Abbreviated Plan to create preferences for the development of
affordable rental housing for properties assisted with NSP3 funds.
City of Miami Beach Date
Jorge M. Gonzalez
City Manager
Title
Page 9 of 13
APPENDIX 1
Neighborhood ID: 4677673
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee ID: 1219740E
Grantee State: FL
Grantee Name: MIAMI BEACH
Grantee Address:
Grantee Email: rsoto @miamibeachfl.gov
Neighborhood Name: The London
Date:2010 -12 -23 00:00:00
NSP3 Score
The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than
the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's
twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 17
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 4656
Area Benefit Eligibility
Percent Persons Less than 120% AMI: 79.82
Percent Persons Less than 80% AMI: 64.75
Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 3268
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 62
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 102
1/3
Foreclosure Estimates
HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious
delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA Census Tract
data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate
change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate
is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association)
and REOs (from Re It Tr to individual block groups.
( a y ac) oc g oups.
Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 1327
Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 16.7
Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 13.4
Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 110
Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 33
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in
the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000
foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REO in past
year): 23
Supporting Data
Metropolitan Area (or non - metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal
Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -39.4
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005': 3.7
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010': 9.5
'Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics
Market Analysis:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition /land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease- purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long -term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and Longitude of corner points
- 80.136638 25.795718 - 80.130072 25.799080 - 80.126252 25.797612 - 80.127583 25.786406 - 80.131874
25.786329 - 80.131488 25.787372 - 80.136337 25.787101 - 80.136509 25.795409
2/3
•
Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood
120860042021000, 120860042021008, 120860042021015, 120860042021014, 120860042021013,
120860042021012, 120860042021011, 120860042021010, 120860042021009, 120860042021007,
120860042021002, 120860042021004, 120860042021005, 120860042021006, 120860042021003,
120860042021001, 120860042022000, 120860042022008, 120860042022012, 120860042022011,
120860042022010, 120860042022009, 120860042022007, 120860042022002, 120860042022004,
120860042022005, 120860042022006, 120860042022003, 120860042022001, 120860042023000,
120860042023005, 120860042023007, 120860042023009, 120860042023011, 120860042023017,
120860042023016, 120860042023015, 120860042023014, 120860042023013, 120860042023012,
120860042023010, 120860042023008, 120860042023006, 120860042023004, 120860042023001,
120860042023003, 120860042023002,
3/3
1
City of Miami Beach
Substantial Amendment
January 18, 2011
APPENDIX 2
Public Comment Period: Thursday, December 30, 2010 thru Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Tuesday, January 18, 2011- no comments were received
Page 13 of 13
• • . •
. . , • • •
, • • • - • • • • . • • •
. ,
• '
•
. .
,
•
. .,.
• . .
•
•
.
. • . . ,
,.
_ . . .... . . .._ ,
.4 . •, ,.. ... , . • .., . .. , .. • Ism .• ..it • 11. ,. 4 11•.; ..I'lg :1111 .11A •
0 .
• . -; .. -;,.••.!' ' r...i'N. a . '• -, ' i•V'' ;::'. -..•.•.., •:.!..g I . g• „a iiiti.,_,'F. p' ' 1 e • '' '''
' "77 Q. .. 3,. • . '11 d'.: 44 ' ::.% - - '',:' : ..',114 . A • . . 11' ....••.• 1 . - t i I g e ' 1.-m '2 . 111.Ns . -6' - ' 4 ''il
• • . g: • 14. . ...' • •'; . :A . ..1.2, :x ' 1 ;... gs• ...,.,..... ..E.a..• :1.,g it, •Kl. • . ttgi ,,, ,Pm. 1 1,.2 .. , '..!.
• 8 -, m . . - . .... 2 ,;;;', v.: •,.. : ' : -,•:!•.;. 14.. Alt .1gR •
glijg ..r..i-.. - 1.1 g •:'
' • r•n •2 st-; ." ' , ,,.... ; ';:•:•-..:., 4 .i•-• . 1 ,:: .' 1 r . it,- • 4 '•• 1$
' ,). ; 0 • • 1 ...,., -:. • '• . , ....; .....31 • 1 ••••• • .' :i • 1:11 ••,k • il. • • u A 11 . . 1
i . . .... .!..-...... i....!' *.a...t;:•.. . ..t. i t 1 1, .1 .p• • - 1 $'. • ,,.. , .1.- I ot.s ...,. •
. . E '.. al z • ' . • . .. , , ., , 14 , .A
•••. .. ., :•.# Ja. ..: , ,...!, A ' . , , , 6 ep 21.oli.1.• I'. 4. .g .1. g. '''''• -
1 ' U s - • r ` '.. . , :Ai ''' ; - ::: * k ••••••-••• '" 11 fg p §; •I ..4... • . r. 6 .1.?. 1,.. Tv 11 ..
.. - - ..,, •tir • : •••.: :: .. •'s . 2.., . • • .1 f ••• ...., i • I la .s„. 3 r...- • • ..4 • 6. . „ , .....,1 ":
,..: ow = . O., . ; ,. .. ....• .. . ,. , ... • ........i ''. "..'.:..... 7,... ''. • is. ,.,..-, g - a a'' . ..... - 61..o. 41 4,1•
1 .
: . . ..1 • 0 r o i Q.7. :4 ... . ....- • Afro • Ill; ' x ;:, ii i :, ; : l i sit . :11 r,..g r !, 1p,t 2
,...g R. :.
- CL •t 4., E•ui . ...V..t •I AV: . W •.•'... . , :: 'Y • 78 A 4!. :1 II, 41 . . ...? .id.. ...vvrit - '' • • €•1-''' gg .-
, • .g 1; G,- is ." I 1:-....:•'. i 1 ' a ' '0 1 . 1 - -'54 . 1 •,,..: .
. . z L. . us : § - .R r ...I it4?.4,114,..°I . i. i. ' . _ . ' .. .,, . , a 1:._ ... .•-•;.; ..
,I2.• 1 ir ,..4 ,.•@ ,.
114 'i 1 Iii '
I I . . • n . • g A .. c4. . . g... l 1. . .1, ..,.....1 ..„.t.s... • 1 -1. 1 g .... ,.
• • .i.„ •..
-. .. . , .Aa•-,,. .r,• , ' : .1- I . • 1_ lg t . I . 1. I lit.
5... •.- 4. 4 .1 •• • . . B. ,. Eli . • .• .
.• •- .. • ••• - •• Z' • 0 " • it ‘ * gItAIA 1 i I al ': •••':
1 , , . . gi si : it i; • :i....1 : ? : ',. . • , •. 1 :7 4: ; .i .■.: 1 , - . : 1 ,1i; . ' !. .!i;e:i.:.i,..:11:11.::.1:1:1r•liAl€C?4,.;,fri.,.*:,:".:4.1:. t!i,:ecti,1,,,,......_%7...1.7.181:31...:11....:•.....;11,..!.1.1" .i...,. •:, :co.........,';:c':'Lu::•‘.:;i:........,.1.,•,.:1:•..i...!..",:.:......111:.!s...:.... L . .. " .... .. ii: :i.:111,e,''..,...:::.....::...... i • ....,.: ....11•16....1's111...,..:,.,.....1.,,,,..:..‘,..,•
• . •• •• - •:,
1 . • ' . ' '' • 1 1 1 11:11 . '''. •• ' a II .:. -:. : , :i. , ,,..... c.?, .:::,. ..,;:. ill 1 .. J A . ,:...,. . . .
1 •.
, Qiii:$ ,` ' • • ., • ' tj ,. ." . . .'• • ;. II } : •/ ' 1 g •11•4 .,: , A , i,' • '.•,:: :' :•., , •
1 . • xl ' -; "
. • . 1 :,4 E ik. 0 i . : I. .1.,::;,•: !. , ' I. - t. ,, , 4 . a 4, :' . - - '.. '2 ' • : ' • 1. ": i
( e 1,111', ..I .-.. to. 14 mea:,? .. .:. . .. .
-.8 11*..., / E ' - '' "...".. •," CO '? . ..., p.g?t. 1. i •.- • • ' . E " '
1 .
• • • •'' 44., :.: '''. 644 CO, EV' ,,, en t • . . :. ••-,cc• - • .4 . - I .. -. a
ri .t. ; . i ,•:i '.; .,.• ,;,,,, : il ... 1 3. 00,- ...; ,. - •.g N.,g g '`... • . s ' . ... ' .'' • 4
1, . . . . - .,
•
,... el) ,... g . p .. .. ..
" 7 ., f.:. .,7' • .'.. , ,t:. • ........,..1 , :,,. ,2:-• • . = 1 * . • :4 . . . .. 1
, , c() • t:, liziP . • 77 ' • .,: i 112 1,...7.: rs, ,•,,, ,•• :.••, ..m A . q f
4 . .4 .:. ' ' . f ;-‘,.. 10 i 7 .1 . 1gr g ,..• .. ig 8 -- ..... .. • • • : .: , . :,, :
• " 41 ,4 1.' ,.-. • .. ;, .. • . '-• 5 8 .
i . •• .1 g• 1 • • -••• ; I. •••._ • •
i i = ..„. - . . EC . i gaa4' • , R. 13- IL' . b-• !•:::,... Eri411 'is c° g' * ":" ... C - . '''T ' . • • - ' • 1 • • • • • W
I Lti ; If. t.ii • fi =. Mo. o l"f".! .1. fil t- ,. =,: r „,„ .1 Di 6". C & g f . itg'l • , • ' ..1 1 ' ,• ' • i • A.!, •
---, . 6 :.`. ' ' ■-'-' i 13., .10 . '..... .,;!.;.- • °' %.0 : • • 1--- .;;; ea . li R A ii ' • . •••• R ' . ....... '. ... H. ' i•;. ,.
u , . i . ,, , ry (Fr . . • • ' ' . t. 40 .*'....-4.:31, ,, - • z., I . 0 a t., .. • 1'
_. . ...,...,,,,._ ___.,..._ ..._., : . ; . , . : ,.,, , „...,......, ; ,_ : _,... i...„. . ;. . , „,.., .....„ ... . ....,.... .,....., pil .... I ...." . 1.. .. .. .,... ir....
, (32- - . cc. - - 4 11.1 'I ' =E'. .• ''' •p ill! . 10.11: ., •`..*, 4 MA - , • ul I • l'::•1 • 1 - 1-• • , - • -u •
. - • IJ-1 . A..,.• - .1.....,,`,'A i , .. V. '1 .• r •V i d il •b$605.1 :.! , • ....0 lz R I. 3 . . . •-- g •• „ -!• : • , .. §. .1
. --e . 6) ,.. • :I g g tg .. -. • 4,-, . - .. : • -. ■i l e' 1 ig d• l'ffo: 1 .54 : ••: El''' ..'
,'' --t... • ' , 41:11 , ci. !II5 : I :- S - ...e., :: ...-:, 21 g Ai ! :..1 III:I.:' . ........,.; • . an .m ... - 1. -t i l.'-g 4 ' ..; ' :. .. ' ' "..". ' • .....• ; 41 ..
' w7 I •,',' a w r ; - • ri L/I 'ii • -• I R i i ! - B . . -....11-.:w••• m • 1 • • I:. .' s.' • • .!:: - ill.
Z c2 z '''' 25 . : - --'7' . . 1=.' P3 '.0 . •' ''';``x : 'bv ;•• 0 • • • • Pit ..s. 'Ei g • t••• . P ' l' ..• -1 • ' .. a • •
E ° •. g 1' 73 1 i i . .. r a ''' - • • .. 't ••• •••=. ; . 1. •• ;•• .• .. - -•EA.• , ••••• •a.
- • - t - c v 6 %1 -1 ; • ----- • m g'-x1F:g• •• P • - gP •-• • .... ''
° 1.111 . 8 t MD itg• a - - .u). .ig kgigv.. s 0 -. , V 'cm- . 2. E .
a 1 . ... ......• .4 11 ' ' ;
f •1, E ...'...1•=•• 'W. ..t" w ig. '. • • .. Lt . ,tfj.....pat
•I A c cA c t, 8 „ ' g zg 7„ . 2 'cc.:0%. ! _ Jit t gi '.. gg A; . * .k:,...1.: g, ,. 1 •",5 ...,••-. . ..... 1 Et . t• 2 '.•••••4) iii i 2-'
. .••_' . ° , CC "I 1 3 .F;.4:19 ' EI '.2 I It. .1 I.g 1 : ...-.:,,•:: ,,..,-.12 .ii:g 44 : ,si • .. :•:,§ .. g.....1 .;.:11.E.1 - • E ,
. Ci w m ,..p,,! E.... g ..u.,,m '... _ ii 1... g§pi ' ..-,; . .• ••••t••• Ali' i j• 4 1... . .. ' .. P ... 'ir . '1" .. - l • ' ..
. 1 E•c:' p ..'.h' • t - .9'Ai • ! g . f • wg ii•i 5 ; ,•••• ::1..- c '. :. .s. ,..: ' .„ L., .1.-N•• r-- 1 . ...1..• . •
1 1 1
' • es•c 1.14 af cJ, t ,..... • g•i - .iggle :-.••• .-kt . 1 vio • ..6 . „8..,,,,...,..........„..
• .1 = Ng. L i) • . i . .t . N.,0,,,.. ' 7, 6. .".-... .: ' i .., ., ; 141: 5 q.... ...' . ' ....,.. ..1 . . w 'l : A k . "; -1 ' • . . -
,„,. 1 -11..... , _, 1 2, ,, . t ....,,..„....li ..13 74 :_• • 1 iigit.. 1•1x.11.• ),::..•.. a - e E..V .....'' •.'11 ...., - ..
• K. 'cc : -*. ;. Ls .'...•,• •-•.. ;?8. - • . ri . . . . . • .. t : . „. • 4 • A* o ' • ' - • - '..' -
. • • .,•• • .
.. .
•
•
•
...„, . ...