LTC 214-2011 Combined Noise Report: Annual 2010-2011 and Quarterly Rep Q2-11 7 .
MIAMI BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
NO. LTC # 214 -2011 LETTER TO COMMISSION
TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission c rn
FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager
o
DATE: August 29, 2011 cf) <
SUBJECT: Combined Noise Report: " cn
1. Annual Noise Report 2010 - 2011 (July 2010 through June 2011); art! c'
2. Quarterly Report Q2 — 2011 (April 2011 through June 2011)
This Letter to Commission (LTC) provides a combined report and data analysis on the enforcement
and compliance efforts of the Building Department's Code Compliance Division (Code) regarding
the City's Noise Ordinance. This report encompasses both the Annual Noise Report, which reflects
data from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011; and the Second Quarterly Report for 2011, which
reflects data from April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011. The metrics and analysis reflected in both
noise reports is aggregated by calendar year quarters, and reflects all of the information required by
the Administrative Guidelines approved in October 2008.
As in previous annual reports, the analysis of commercial related noise cases is explored and
evaluated in greater depth than that of residential noise cases. It is also noteworthy to enumerate
several procedural changes initiated by Code earlier this year including:
• The training of new Code Compliance Officers (CCOs) and re- training of current staff;
• The reconfiguration and re- deployment of CCO grids and geographic zones (officer
assignments)
• The addition of new case status classifications and case resolutions to the Permits Plus
database; and lastly, and of key importance,
• The development of a formal Noise Ordinance Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
As a direct result of these combined factors, the Code Compliance Division expects to continue to
improve its overall performance, efficiency and service delivery.
The report includes the following support documentation:
• Attachment A — Annual Report for 2010 -2011, detailed information of all noise cases
opened during the reporting period
• Attachment B — Annual Report - an analysis for Commercial Noise Cases, for the
reporting period
• Attachment C — Annual Report - table depicting the reason commercial noise cases
were deemed non - valid; and
• Attachments D through G - data for the 2 Quarter, 2011
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 – June 2011) & 2 Quarter 2011
Page 2of9
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL REPORT DATA
As aforementioned, Attachment A to this report provides the overall annual data for Quarters 3 and
4 for Calendar Year 2010, and Quarters 1 and 2 of Calendar Year 2011, which collectively reflect
the fifth year since the inception of the Noise Ordinance. During the reporting period of July 1, 2010
through June 30, 2011, a total of 4,664 noise cases were opened, which represents a 21.5%
increase compared to last year (2009 -10: 3,836 cases). Of these cases:
* 180 cases were cancelled by the complainant (e.g. complainant called back to cancel call)
* Forty eight (48) were voided as a result of a clerical /staff error
* Thirteen (13) were deemed a duplicate complaint
* Eleven (11) cases were closed /not applicable to Code
Therefore, 4 412 noise cases remained where the disposition was valid or non - valid.
A historical analysis reflects that the number of noise - related cases continues to increase when
compared to prior years. (See Chart #1 below). This phenomenon may be related to a number of
factors, including increased awareness by the general public regarding the Noise Ordinance; the
effective dissemination of information regarding City services through marketing and other efforts;
and the general public's accessibility to reporting this issue.
Total Noise Cases Opened
By Year
5,000 , 4 6 __--- ____�,..
4,000
2 69
3,000
2,000
1,000 -
0 -, a ,— — ,
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11
Chart #1
Chart #2 (on the next page) reflects a specific and clear pattern in noise - related cases opened by
quarter, since the Noise Ordinance was first approved in 2006. The chart reflects a higher number
of cases in Quarter 1 (October through December), in line with an increased amount of Special
Events, holiday - related festivities during the end of the year, as well as an increase in the number of
visitors and tourists that come to the City for its weather and amenities. Inversely, there is a
decrease in noise - related cases during the spring and summer months (Quarters 2 and 3), when
the number of visitors subsides.
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 June _ 2011) & 2 Q uarter 2011
Page 3 of 9
1800 TQtah.Nl of N.cl.S..e
1600 1567 13y er
Quart
—0-2006
1400 ., :
--f-- 2007
1200 __ _ _____— ----- .
1 * 940 .__..
... 8 95 . . __
.,_.- 2008
1000 _
93s .... 802
800 _ ...e__ _ —_— 2009
600 " •• :.__.._— �_ 9_ _— _._
--"—"'-"..."'"'••••...., / —' l — 2010
400
485
200 - ' -2011
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Chart #2
Of the 4,412 cases with a valid /non -valid disposition the rate of cases closed with a valid
disposition was 16.2 %, which ranged from as high as 19.2% for commercial cases, to 16.7% for
"others", and 15.5% for residential cases. As defined in previous reports, valid cases are those
where noise is identified to be "excessive, unreasonable, unusual, and unnecessary' at the time of
arrival by a Code Compliance Officer (CCO) or a Police Officer, and as reflected in Section 21 -28 of
the Miami -Dade County Code, and Article IV, Section 46 -152 of the City of Miami Beach Code.
Additionally, between the hours of 11:00 pm and 7:00 am, a noise violation is deemed valid if
"plainly audible at 100 feet", as reflected in both sections of the county and city code referenced
above.
It is worth noting that as a result of a number of initiatives [including multiple staff training sessions
to ensure consistent application of the Code, and removal of outliers (incidences outside the
general trend)]; the noise validity rate increased a number of percentage points in the last quarter.
OVERALL TRENDS
A historical analysis since the inception of the Noise Reports (Chart #3 below) consistently indicates
that the majority of noise - related cases take place within residentially zoned areas. Below is a
historical analysis, by quarter, going back to the 4 Quarter of 2007, through the 2nd Quarter of
2011.
Residential vs. Commercial
1200 (Historical Data_ y _Quarter)
— 999 1137 Is
woo
926 e,
800 — b40 71 r ,752
62. 650 6 2
", .'
800
•.>
4i 392 45; 451 4 547
G % ,■ 339
400 �;
34 w 323 .. 2 : 1^ 1 246
_.., OR
200 ' ". �".; Ag �„ $9 oft. -,,, 189 X 18 =
0 170 • 139 1,
� � ri9 X O r O x ,i9 X 5 9 � r O O 5 9 � ' O X 59 � ( O X 1 9 � ( O X 5 9 X 1 9
0- p 0 C p. O- C3 6 c c c O' o- O- (
.....*Residential # 6—Commercial #
Chart #3
I '
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2nd Quarter 2011
Page 4 of 9
During the annual rating period, which measures data between July 2010 and June 2011, more
than three (3) of every four (4) noise - related cases (75.8 %) were deemed to be residential in
nature, as opposed to 16.2% for Commercial, and 8.0% for "Other." (See chart below).
BREAKDOWN OF TOTAL CASES BY TYPE
July 2010 — June 2011
RESIDENTIAL 3,345 75.80%
COMMERCIAL 713 16.20%
OTHER 354 8.00%
TOTAL 4,412 100%
Chart #4
Further analysis indicates that noise cases for apartments (2,069) represent nearly half (46.9 %) of
all noise cases opened, followed by condominiums (764 — 17.3 %), and single family homes (512 —
11.6 %). By comparison, of the commercial noise cases, hotels reflected the highest incidence of
commercial noise - related cases opened with a total of 232 or 5.3% of all noise cases opened
(4,412). (See Attachment B). Consistent with previous reports, loud music continues to be the
noise type that generates the most cases, representing 79.8% of all noise cases (3,519); followed
by barking dogs (12.8% - 563 cases); and construction noise (7.0% - 311 cases).
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL REPORT DATA — COMMERCIAL CASES
In light of previous discussion, which centered on the impact of commercial noise cases, the
following summary will focus on the results for the past year as it relates to noise cases opened for
commercial establishments. Commercial cases, as identified in the report, includes cases opened
for noise complaints in bars, clubs, hotels, condo /hotels, restaurants, retail and construction sites.
Of the 4,412 noise cases with a disposition, 713 were deemed to be commercial in nature.
An analysis of the 713 commercial cases with a valid /non -valid disposition for the period running
from July 2010 through June 2011, indicates that:
✓ 31.4% of all cases for retail were closed as valid
✓ 21.5% of all cases for restaurants were closed as valid
✓ 20.0% of all cases for condo -hotel establishments were closed as valid
✓ 19.5% of all cases for bars were closed as valid
✓ 18.5% of all cases for hotel were closed as valid
✓ 10.6% of all cases for clubs were closed as valid
As noted, the valid closure rate for commercial cases ranged from a high of 31.4% to 10.6 %. As a
result, in the aggregate, the average valid closure rate for commercial cases is 19.2%
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2nd Quarter 2011
Page 5 of 9
The chart below reflects the breakdown by type of commercial establishment of all of the 713
Commercial Cases for the period of July 2010 through June 2011 (See Attachment B).
All Commercial Cases - By Establishment Type
July 2010 - June 2011
BARS, 12.2%
HOTEL, 32.5%
rr CLUBS, 15.8%
CONDO /HOTEL,
4.2%
RETAIL, 7.2%
RESTAURANT,
28.1%
Chart #5
A. Type of Noise - Commercial Cases
As reflected in previous historical analyses, loud music was the most common type of noise
reported for all commercial noise cases opened. For commercial violations, this type of noise
accounted for 93.1% of all cases opened in the measured year, with 5.8% (41 cases) identified as
construction noise. The remaining eight (8) cases were for barking dog (5); crowd noise (1); live
entertainment (1); and honking cars /alarms (1).
As it relates to the reasons why commercial noise cases were identified as non - valid, the vast
majority of the cases (257 - 45 %) were closed as non -valid because at the time of arrival, the noise
or music did not meet the noise ordinance criteria for a valid complaint, or it was deemed to be not
excessive. Other reasons for deeming the complaint not valid include there being "no noise at the
time of the CCOs /PDs arrival" (121 - 21%); and that, in addition to the noise cr the noise was
not audible at 100 feet (after 11:00 PM) (121 cases - 21%) (See Attachment C).
B. Time/Day of Week of Commercial Noise occurring
Following the same pattern as in previous reports, it is interesting to note that an analysis of the
time the violation was reported reflects a relatively even balance — including for commercial cases -
between noise cases opened /reported for noise occurring between the hours of 11:00 PM and 7:00
AM (53.2 %), and those between 7:00 AM and 11:00 PM (46.8%). The expectation of a higher
incidence after 11:00 pm appears not to be supported by the evidence. For commercial cases
closed as valid, the rate expectedly flips (higher commercial activity during the day) to 59.1% of the
noise cases valid between 7 AM to 11 PM, as opposed to 40.9% valid between 11 PM and 7 AM.
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2nd Quarter 2011
Page 6 of 9
As it relates to days of the week, it is not surprising to reflect that the overwhelming majority of
commercial noise cases are opened / received on weekends. The three -day period of Friday
through Sunday accounts for nearly 2/3 of these cases (59.5%), with the remaining 40.5% taking
Y Y ( )� 9 9
place Monday through Thursday, in an increasing fashion. As expected, the busiest day of the week
(in regard to noise - related cases) is Saturday, accounting for 23.4% of commercial cases, followed
by Friday (18.4 %) and then Sunday (17.7 %).
C. Arrival Time
During the rating period, data analysis on "arrival time" obtained from the Computer Aided
Dispatching (CAD) System at the Parking Department, reflects a visible difference between valid
and non -valid commercial cases, with an arrival time difference of about 5% minutes. On average,
the valid commercial violations took 19 minutes, 36 seconds; while the non -valid cases took 25
minutes and 7 seconds. This may indicate some correlation between the response times impacting
the noise enforcement outcomes for commercial cases.
Notwithstanding, Code has targeted reducing the response time as one of its key goals within the
current fiscal year. The reduction in the response time has become evident with the addition of new
part -time CCOs, which are making an impact in the comprehensive service delivery. The average
time for CCO arrival is provided below.
Average Time for Code Officer to Arrive (July 2010 — June 2011)
Average Average Time from CaII
Time to Received by Dispatch
Number Establishment Officer's Number to Code Officer's
of Cases Type Arrival* Status of Cases Arrival*
VALID 495 0:26:17
Residential 0:26:43
NON -VALID 2,640 0:26:48
VALID 108 0:19:36
4,108 Commercial 0:24:13
NON -VALID 561 0:25:07
VALID 48 0:24:54
Other 0:25:58
NON -VALID 256 0:26:10
VALID 651 0:25:04
All Cases 0:26:15
NON -VALID 3,457 0:26:28
*Average Time Calculated using only those cases with valid time data for both Time Call Received by Dispatch" and
"Time of Arrival by Code Officer"
Chart #6
MAJOR EVENTS / SPECIAL EVENTS
Within the Annual period (July 2010 through June 2011), there were a number of events that
appeared to have had an impact in the volume of noise cases opened. These events included
Memorial /Urban Beach Weekend, Spring Break, and Ultra Music Festival, where the incidence of
noise - complaints escalated when compared to instances where there were no special events.
Inversely, not all special events impacted noise - related cases. There were other events throughout
the City where the data reflects that there was either a marginal effect or not a significant effect on
noise complaints. These other events include the SoBe Wine and Food Festival, the Miami Beach
International Boat Show, the Festival of the Arts, Art -Deco Weekend and, perhaps surprisingly,
Winter Music Conference (WMC).
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2 " Quarter 2011
Page 7 of 9
CASES REFERRED TO POLICE DEPARTMENT
In the last LTC and quarterly report (Quarter 1 — 2011), training sessions, both internal and external
were outlined. During the last quarter, there were additional training sessions with both the Police
Department (PD) and the Parking Department (which handles dispatching responsibilities for Code
and all calls made to (305) 604- CITY(2489) related to the Noise Ordinance). One of the key topics
discussed was noise - related cases and the conditions when Dispatch would refer a noise complaint
directly to PD. As previously noted, when a call is received regarding vehicular noise, or unruly
behavior (disturbance of the peace) the call is reassigned to PD. Code continues and has never
ceased to address complaints regarding crowd noise, except when they are related to potential
criminal behavior.
Data research reflects that between July 2010 and June 2011, there were a total of 271 cases
routed to PD as Code staff was unavailable (Monday through Wednesday, 1:00 AM through 6:00
AM). In addition, there were an additional 46 cases that were associated with disturbance of the
peace, vehicular noise, etc. These were referred to PD for their review and appropriate action.
The validity rate for noise complaints addressed by the Police Department is significantly lower than
those noise complaints addressed by Code. In an effort to bridge this gap, Code will expand and
enhance training sessions for the Police Department.
COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS ANNUAL NOISE REPORTS
This report marks the third full year of coverage and evaluation since the final amendment to the
Noise Ordinance in July 2008. As previously noted, a comparative analysis indicates that there is
an increasing trend of noise cases opened, with a 21.5% increase relative to last year, and a
substantive 73.06% increase relative to 2006 -07.
Other issues include the following:
➢ The total number of valid cases (for all types) increased by 29.7% when
compared to last year
➢ The overall validity rate also increased, from 15.1% in 2009 -10, to 16.2% in
2010 -11
➢ The validity rate for Commercial Noise Cases has remained about the
same, increasing by less than 1 percentage point (0.7 %) vis -a -vis last year
> The validity rate for residential noise violations increased by 1.2% relative
to last year
o 15.5% in 2010 -2011
o 14.3% in 2009 -2010
> Loud music continues to be the predominant type of noise complaint,
comprising the majority of all, as well as commercial cases
o 79.8% of all noise cases in 2010 -11 were deemed to be loud music
o 84.9% of all noise cases in 2009 -10 were deemed to be loud music
•
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2 Quarter 2011
Page 8 of 9
SUMMARY OF 2 QUARTER 2011 DATA
In an attempt to avoid being repetitive, the analysis for the 2 quarter will focus on salient issues.
For the period encompassing April 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011, Code opened 940 cases. Of
these:
• Sixty -four (64) were canceled by the complainant
• Seven (7) were voided
• Four (4) were deemed to be duplicate complaints
• Two (2) were closed as a result of the Special Master's ruling on preceding cases and
• Five (5) were not applicable to Code.
Thus, the total number of cases with a valid or non -valid disposition was 858 cases. Of these, 662
cases (77.2 %) were identified to have taken place at a residentially zoned location; 139 cases were
deemed commercial (16.2 %); and 57 (6.6 %) of identified as "other ".
There is a consistent and specific pattern of cases opened, whereby the incidence of cases opened
in the second quarter is the second lowest number opened in the year. The chart below clearly
demonstrates the quarterly trends going back to 2007.
1800 Total Number of Noise Cases
by Quarter
1600 1567 -
■ 2006
1400 140,'
• 2007
1200
107
1000 ®2008
87 1000
. _. __._._.__ :9
784 802 • 2009
800 66. . ■
637 632
600 - _.._.....__. .. 010
400
43 _ 011
200 - --
0 ._ .
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Chart #7
During the 2 Quarter of 2011, 182 of the 858 cases with a valid / non -valid disposition were
deemed valid, with an overall validity rate of 21.2% Further analysis by establishment type
indicates a higher than usual validity rate of 21.5% for Residential properties, 21.6% for Commercial
properties, and 17.5% for "other ". This reflects an increase of 5% percentage points in the
validity rate vis -a -vis the 1 Quarter of 2011, and a 7.4% increase versus Q2 of 2010. One of
the many factors contributing towards the higher validity rate in residential properties can be
identified to a number of illegally leased Short-Term Rental Properties that have been linked to
events involving noise violations.
Letter to Commission
Annual Noise Report (July 2010 — June 2011) & 2 Quarter 2011
Page 9 of 9
Several other factors may explain the higher validity rate during the 2 Quarter of 2011; these
include:
✓ Multiple Training Sessions, [three (3) separate sessions in calendar year
2011), for all staff to ensure consistent application of the Code]
✓ Ongoing review of data with supervisory staff to ensure consistent
application of the Code
✓ Comprehensive review of process, to include input from the Office of the
City Attorney
✓ Development and establishment of a formal Noise Ordinance Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs).
Attachment D to this report provides the data for Quarter 2 of 2011.
SPECIAL MASTERS APPEAL HEARINGS -
During the reporting period encompassing April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011,' there were a total
of seven (7) appeals filed with the Special Master for noise - related cases. There were 20 cases
actually heard by the Special Master, including three (3) of the cases appealed during the current
quarter and 16 cases where appeals were filed prior to the current reporting quarter. During this
quarter, fines for appeals upheld totaled $5,250. The respective status of the 24 cases is reflected
in Attachment G.
As reflected in the attachment, of the twenty (20) appealed cases heard during the current quarter,
one (1) case was granted a continuance, seven (7) cases were heard and upheld (three with
reductions), one (1) case was withdrawn (and paid by petitioner), and eleven (11) were dismissed
by the Special Master. Further analysis reflects that a number of dismissals were due to the fact
that the witnessing CCO was unavailable to attend the hearing due to sick and /or educational leave.
CONCLUSION
As you are aware, during the annual reporting period, we had a change in the Division Director and
increased staffing (Part-Time Quality of Life). Much emphasis has been placed by Code, Division
Director Robert Santos- Alborna in identifying areas for improvement and emphasizing our
expectation for accountability. The Noise Report reflects the efforts implemented in the last ten (10)
months to better formalize and standardize process, increase training, improve interdepartmental
communication in response to complaints and enhance data collection.
JMG /HMF /RSA
Attachments
Attachment A - Noise Data — 7/01/2010 through 6/30/2011
Attachment B — Commercial Noise Cases - 7/01/2010 through 6/30/2011
Attachment C — Commercial Noise Cases — Reasons Why Non -Valid (07/01 /2010 — 06/30/2011)
Attachment D — Noise Data — Quarterly Report - (4/01/2011 through 6/30/2011)
Attachment E - Commercial Noise Cases Q2 (4/01/2011 through 6/30/2011)
Attachment F — Commercial Noise Cases — Why Not Valid (4/01/2011 — 6/30/2011)
Attachment G — Special Masters Appeal Hearings - (4/01/2011 — 6/30/2011)
F:\CODE\$ADM \Robert\NOISE REPORTS ANNUAL - July 2010- June 2011 Q2 2011 LTC.docx
ATTACHMENT A
ALL CASES
Noise Data 07/01/2010 - 06/30/2011 (Annual Report) _
Total Number of
Noise Complaint Disposition of All Noise Cases
Less Voided, Canceled, Code or PD -
Total Cases Opened Duplicate Complaints Total with Dispositions Initiated Complaint Calls Type #
Complaints not Applicable to Received
Code Compliance (Proactive)
4,664 252 4,412 33 4,379 Total Cases 4,664
Canceled** 180
Voided* 48
*Voided cases are cases that were entered in error, etc. Duplicate Complaint 13
'"`Canceled calls are cases canceled by the complainant prior to a Code Officer's arrival Not Applicable to Code 9
Closed (as a result of a 2
Special Master ruling)
Valid Violation Breakdown ( Total Valid and Non - Valid Cases 4,412
Verbal 35 4 9% Valid Cases 716
Written Warning 553 77.2% Non -valid Cases 3,696
Violation 128 17.9%
Total Valid Cases 716
Noise Cases by Type of Establishment
Total Cases Valid Non -Valid
Percentage of All
Number of Cases Percentage of Number of Percentage of
(Valid & Non - Valid) Cases (Valid & Non- Number of Cases Cases Cases Cases
Valid)
Residential 3,345 75 8% 520 15 5% 2825 84 5%
Commercial 713 16 2% 137 19 2% 576 80.8%
Other 354 8 0% 59 16 7% 295 83 3%
Tota /s 4,412 716 16.2% 3,696 83.8%
Residential = Apt, Condo, Single Family
Commercial = Bar, Club, Hotel, Hotel- Condo, Restaurant, Retail, Constr -Com
Other = Bandshell, Beach, Public Property, etc..
Total Cases Valid Cases Non -Valid Cases
Percentage of All
Number of Cases Percentage of Number of Percentage of
(Valid & Non - Valid) Cases Number of Cases Cases Cases Cases
(Valid & Non - Valid)
APT 2069 46.9% 256 12 4% 1813 87.6%
BAR 87 2 0% 17 19 5% 70 80 5%
CLUBS 113 2.6% 12 10 6% 101 89 4%
CONDO 764 17.3% 150 19 6% 614 80.4%
CONDO -HOTEL 30 0.7% 6 20 0% 24 80.0%
HOME 512 11.6% 114 22 3% 398 77.7%
OTHER 351 8.0% 59 16 8% 292 83.2%
RESTAURANT 200 4.5% 43 21 5% 157 78.5%
RETAIL 51 1.2% 16 31 4% 35 68.6%
HOTEL 232 5.3% 43 18 5% 189 81.5%
UNKNOWN 3 0.1% 0 0 0% 3 100.0%
Totals 4,412 716 16.2% 3,696 83.8%
Noise Cases by Noise Type
Noise Type TOTALS Valid Cases Non -valid Cases
LOUD MUSIC 3,519 79 8% 543 15 4% 2976 84.6%
LIVE ENTERTAINMENT 4 - 1 - 3 -
BARKING DOG 563 12.8% 105 18 7% 458 81.3%
CROWD NOISE 8 0.2% 2 25.0% 6 75.0%
CONSTRUCTION 311 7 0% 62 19 9% 249 80.1%
OTHER 0 - 0 - 0 -
HONKING CARS 7 02% 3 - 4 57.1%
Totals 4,412 716 16.2% 3,696 83.8%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 1 of 2
Call Time of Day / Day of Week
TOTAL VALID AND NON -VALID CASES
11p -7a
Percentage of total
Total 7a - 11p that occurred on that
(of the following morning) day of week
Monday 397 9 0% 252 63.5% 145 36.5% 9 0%
Tuesday 450 10.2% 253 56.2% 197 43.8% 10 2%
Wednesday 486 11.0% 249 51.2% 237 48.8% 11 0%
Thursday 630 14.3% 286 45.4% 344 54.6% 14 3%
Friday 787 17 8% 337 42 8% _ 450 57.2% 17 8%
Saturday 976 22.1% 473 48 5% 503 51.5% 22 1%
Sunday 686 15 5% 447 65.2% 239 34.8% 15 5%
Totals 4,412 2297 52.1% 2115 47.9%
VALID
Total 7a - 11p 11p - 7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 82 11.5% 59 72 0% 23 28.0%
Tuesday 67 9 4% 44 65 7% 23 34.3%
Wednesday 66 9 2% 40 60.6% 26 39.4%
Thursday 83 11.6% 37 44 6% 46 55 4%
Friday 126 17.6% 54 42.9% 72 57.1%
Saturday 186 26.0% 106 57 0% 80 43.0%
Sunday 106 14.8% 74 69 8% 32 30.2%
Totals 716 16.2% 414 57.8% 302 42.2%
NON -VALID
Total 7a - 11p 11p - 7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 315 8 5% 193 61.3% 122 38.7%
Tuesday 383 10.4% 209 54.6% 174 45.4%
Wednesday 420 11 4% 209 49.8% 211 50 2%
Thursday 547 14 8% 249 45.5% 298 54.5%
Friday 661 17.9% 283 42.8% 378 57 2%
Saturday 790 21.4% 367 46.5% 423 53.5%
Sunday 580 15.7% 373 64.3% 207 35 7%
Totals 3,696 83.8% 1883 50.9% 1813 49.1%
Call Time of Day - Residential vs Commercial
11p -7a
Total 7a - 11p (of the following moming)
RESIDENTIAL 3,345 75 8% 1731 51.7% 1614 48 3%
COMMERCIAL 713 16 2% 334 46.8% 379 53.2%
OTHER 354 8.0% 232 65.5% 122 34.5%
Totals _ 4,412 2297 52.1% 2115 47.9%
Breakdown of Calls with Identified Complainants and with Anonymous Complainants
Total Cases Valid Cases Non -valid Cases
Totals 4,412 716 16.2% 3,696 83.8%
Anonymous Complainant 2754 62 4% 368 13 4% 2386 86.6%
Anonymous with Contact
made 158 3 6% 29 18.4% 129 81.6%
Contact Information I
Provided 1463 33 2% 288 19.7% 1175 80.3%
Internal 31 0 7% 29 93 5% 2 6.5%
Not Noted 6 0 2% 2 33.3% 4 66.7%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT B
COMMERCIAL NOISE CASES
Noise Data 07/01/2010 - 06/30/2011 (Annual Report) .
Total Number of Noise Complaint Calls Received Disposition of All Noise
Cases
Total Cases Less Code or Complaint Calls Type # yo
PD Initiated
(Valid and Non -valid only) (Proactive) Received Valid Cases 137 19.2%
713 23 690 Non -valid Cases 576 80.8%
Total Valid and Non -Valid Cases = 713 ME
Valid Violation Breakdown
Verbal 24 17.5%
Written Warning 69 50.4%
Violation 44 32.1%
Total Valid Cases 137
Noise Cases by Type of Establishment
% of Commercial
Location Type Totals Cases Valid Non -Valid
(Valid /Non - Valid)
BAR 87 12.2% 17 19.5% 70 80.5%
CLUBS 113 15.8% 12 10.6% 101 89.4%
CONDO -HOTEL 30 4.2% 6 20.0% 24 80.0%
RESTAURANT 200 28.1% 43 21.5% 157 78.5%
RETAIL 51 7.2% 16 31.4% 35 68.6%
HOTEL 232 32.5% 43 18.5% 189 81.5%
Total 713 137 19.2% 576 80.8%
Noise Cases by Noise Type
% of Commercial
Noise Type Totals Cases Valid Non -valid
(Valid /Non - Valid)
LOUD MUSIC 664 93.1% 129 19.4% 535 80.6%
LIVE ENTERTAINMENT 1 0.1% 1 - 0 -
BARKING DOG 5 0.7% 0 - 5 100.0%
CROWD NOISE 1 0.1% 0 - 1 100.0%
CONSTRUCTION 41 5.8% 7 17.1% 34 82.9%
OTHER 0 0.0% 0 - 0 -
HONKING CARS /ALARMS 1 0.1% 0 - 1 100.0%
Totals 713 137 19.2% 576 80.8%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 1 of 2
Time of Day / Day of Week of CaII •
TOTAL VALID AND NON -VALID CASES
11 p - 7a Percentage of total that
Total 7a - 11p occurred on that day of
(of the following morning) week
Monday 39 24 61.5% 15 38.5% 5.5%
Tuesday 64 31 48.4% 33 51.6% 9.0% •
Wednesday 68 31 45.6% 37 54.4% 9.5% j
Thursday 118 46 39.0% 72 61.0% 16.5%
Friday 131 51 38.9% 80 61.1% 18.4%
Saturday 167 69 41.3% 98 58.7% 23.4%
Sunday 126 82 65.1% 44 34.9% 17.7%
Totals 713 334 46.8% 379 53.2%
VALID
Total 7a- 11p 11p-7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 10 7.3% 8 80.0% 2 20.0%
Tuesday 11 8.0% 7 63.6% 4 36.4%
Wednesday 7 5.1% 4 57.1% 3 42.9%
Thursday 22 16.1% 8 36.4% 14 63.6%
Friday 23 16.8% 11 47.8% 12 52.2%
Saturday 33 24.1% 22 66.7% 11 33.3%
Sunday 31 22.6% 21 67.7% 10 32.3%
Totals 137 19.2% 81 59.1% 56 40.9%
NON -VALID
Total 7a- 11p 11p-7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 29 5.0% 16 55.2% 13 44.8%
Tuesday 53 9.2% 24 45.3% 29 54.7%
Wednesday 61 10.6% 27 44.3% 34 55.7%
Thursday 96 16.7% 38 39.6% 58 60.4%
Friday 108 18.8% 40 37.0% 68 63.0%
Saturday 134 23.3% 47 35.1% 87 64.9%
Sunday 95 16.5% 61 64.2% 34 35.8%
Totals 576 80.8% 253 43.9% 323 56.1%
Breakdown of Calls with Identified Complainants and with Anonymous Complainants
Valid Cases Valid Cases Non -valid Cases
Total Complaints 713 137 19.2% 576 80.8%
Anonymous Complainant 413 57.9% 68 16.5% 345 83.5%
Anonymous with Contact
made 20 2.8% 2 10.0% 18 90.0%
Contact Information Provided 208 29.2% 46 22.1% 162 77.9%
Internal (Proactive) 71 10.0% 21 29.6% 50 70.4%
Not noted 1 0.2% 0 - 1 100.0%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 2 of 2
T-
T-
O
N
O
O
N
To
uOgaw o 0
= i o N
Q
pi!a U , , Od o
N
�oN ���� � a!q1pn e
5 - 2 W ell t Jeljb ( o
J ON N
Z
eAis
0 A no n •
� • sa °k ' ao
Q N OSIO N/°!sn i In
U GU N d'
CC
W anss/ apo
0
0
7b-4 b a s ioN o ( o
J N
Q
ss °Poo
Z °
o b/ ssa° ° b O °
Z N
IU8 'U/
2
is
= paaa!a,ia�ao °°
Mo! as!ON/ o o
CO , nlN °°
Z
0
CO Q S7b10
W ` w
0 SS V/0 a
1- 4/ b b /3e /WPV _
Z
NON 9z
2 w
= a ,
0
Q
H
H
Q
ATTACHMENT D
ALL CASES
Noise Data 03/01/2011 - 06/30/2011 (Q2 -2011)
Total Number of
Noise Complaint Disposition of All Noise Cases
Less Voided,
.
Canceled, Duplicate Code or PD
Total Cases Opened Complaints, Total with Dispositions Initiated Complaint Calls Type #
Complaints not (Proactive) Received
Applicable to Code
Comnliance
940 82 858 15 843 Total Cases 940
Canceled ** 64
Voided* 7
*Voided cases are cases that were entered in error, etc. Duplicate Complaint 4
**Canceled cal /s are cases canceled by the complainant prior to a Code Officer's arrival Not Applicable to Code 5
Closed (as a result of a 2
Special Master ruling)
alid Violation Breakdown Total Valid and Non -Valid Cases 858
Verbal 15 8 2% Valid Cases 182
Written Warning 143 78.6% Non -valid Cases 676
Violation 24 13.2%
Total Valid Cases 182
Noise Cases by Type of Establishment
Total Cases Valid Non -Valid
Number of Cases Percentage of All Number of Cases Percentage of Number of Percentage of
Cases Cases Cases Cases
Residential 662 77 2% 142 21 5% 520 78.5%
Commercial 139 16.2% 30 21.6% 109 78.4%
Other 57 6.6% 10 17.5% 47 82 5%
Totals 858 182 21.2% 676 _ 78.8%
Residential = Apt, Condo, Single Family
Commercial = Bar, Club, Hotel, Hotel - Condo, Restaurant, Retail, Constr -Com
Other = Bandshell, Beach, Public Property, etc..
Total Cases Valid Cases Non -Valid Cases
Number of Cases Percentage of All Number of Cases Percentage of Number of Percentage of
Cases Cases Cases Cases
APT 402 46.9% 62 15 4% 340 84.6%
BAR 13 1.5% 4 30 8% 9 69 2%
CLUBS 15 1.7% 2 13 3% 13 86.7%
CONDO 159 18 5% 48 30.2% 111 69 8%
CONDO -HOTEL 5 0.6% 0 0.0% 5 100 0%
HOME 101 11 8% 32 31 7% 69 68 3%
OTHER 57 6 6% 10 17 5% 47 82 5%
RESTAURANT 49 5.7% 9 18 4% 40 81.6%
RETAIL 17 2 0% 7 41.2% 10 58 8%
HOTEL 40 4 7% 8 20 0% 32 80 0%
Totals , 858 182 21.2% 676 78.8%
Noise Cases by Noise Type
Noise Type TOTALS Valid C ases Non -valid Cases
LOUD MUSIC 675 78 7% 143 21.2% 532 78.8%
LIVE ENTERTAINMENT 1 0 1% 0 - 1 -
BARKING DOG 110 12.8% 22 20.0% 88 80 0%
CROWD NOISE 2 0.2% 0 - 2 100.0%
CONSTRUCTION 69 8 0% 16 23.2% 53 76.8%
OTHER 0 - 0 - 0 -
HONKING CARS /ALARMS 1 0.1% 1 100.0% 0 0.0%
Totals' 858 182 21.2% 676 78.8%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE' Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 1 of 2
Call Time of Day / Day of Week
TOTAL VALID AND NON -VALID CASES
11 p - 7a Percentage of
Total 7a - 11p total that
(of the following moming) occurred on that
day of week
Monday 84 9 8% 56 66 7% 28 33.3% 9.8%
Tuesday 93 10.8% 43 46 2% 50 53 8% 10 8%
Wednesday 98 11 4% 49 50.0% 49 50 0% 11 4% -
Thursday 114 13.3% 51 44 7% 63 55 3% 13 3% -
Friday 149 17.4% 73 49.0% 76 51.0% 17 4% _
Saturday 208 24.2% 95 45.7% 113 54.3% 24 2%
Sunday 112 13.1% 78 69 6% 34 30.4% 13 1%
Totals 858 445 51.9% 413 48.1%
VALID
Total 7a -11p 11p -7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 23 12.6% 18 78.3% 5 21.7%
Tuesday 19 10.4% 11 57.9% 8 42 1%
Wednesday 10 5.5% 9 90.0% 1 10 0%
Thursday 19 10.4% 9 47.4% 10 52 6%
Friday 32 17.6% 12 37.5% 20 62 5%
Saturday 51 28.0% 24 47.1% 27 52 9%
Sunday 28 15.4% 17 60 7% 11 39.3%
Totals 182 21.2% 100 54.9% 82 45.1%
NON -VALID
Total 7a -11p 11p -7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 61 9.0% 38 62 3% 23 37.7%
Tuesday 74 10 9% 32 43.2% 42 56.8%
Wednesday 88 13 0% 40 45 5% 48 54.5%
Thursday 95 14 1% 42 44 2% 53 55 8%
Friday 117 17.3% 61 52 1% 56 47 9%
Saturday 157 23 2% 71 45 2% 86 54 8%
Sunday 84 12 4% 61 72.6% 23 27 4%
Totals 676 78.8% 345 51.0% 331 49.0%
CaII Time of Day - Residential vs Commercial
11p -7a
Total 7a - 11p (of the following morning)
RESIDENTIAL 662 77 2% 341 51.5% 321 48.5%
COMMERCIAL 139 16 2% 65 46.8% 74 53.2%
OTHER 57 6.6% 39 68.4% 18 31.6%
Totals 858 445 51.9% 413 48.1%
Breakdown of Calls with Identified Complainants and with Anonymous Complainants
Total Cases Valid Cases Non -valid Cases
Totals 858 182 21.2% 676 78.8%
Anonymous Complainant 530 61 8% 88 16.6% 442 83.4%
Anonymous with Contact
made 28 3.3% 6 21.4% 22 78 6%
Contact Information
Provided 287 33 4% 75 26.1% 212 73 9%
Internal 13 1.5% 13 100 0% I 0 -
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 2 of 2
r
ATTACHMENT E
COMMERCIAL NOISE CASES
Noise Data 03/01/2011 - 06/30/2011 (Q2 -2011)
Total Number of Noise Complaint Calls Received Disposition of All Noise
Cases
Total Cases Less Code or Complaint Calls Type ##
PD Initiated Received
(Valid and Non -valid only) (Proactive) Valid Cases 30 21.6%
139 11 128 Non -valid Cases 109 78.4%
Total Valid and Non -Valid Cases = I 139
Valid Violation Breakdown
Verbal 11 36.7%
Written Warning 14 46.7%
Violation 5 16.7%
Total Valid Cases 30
Noise Cases by Type of Establishment
% of Commercial
Location Type Totals Cases Valid Non -Valid
(Valid /Non - Valid)
BAR 13 9.4% 4 30.8% 9 69.2%
CLUBS 15 10.8% 2 13.3% 13 86.7%
CONDO -HOTEL 5 3.6% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
RESTAURANT 49 35.3% 9 18.4% 40 81.6%
RETAIL 17 12.2% 7 41.2% 10 58.8%
HOTEL 40 28.8% 8 20.0% 32 80.0%
Total 139 1 30 21.6% 109 78.4%
Noise Cases by Noise Type
% of Commercial
Noise Type Totals Cases Valid Non -valid
(Valid /Non - Valid)
LOUD MUSIC 128 92.1% 29 22.7% 99 77.3%
LIVE ENTERTAINMENT 0 0.0% 0 - 0 -
BARKING DOG 1 0.7% 0 - 1 100.0%
CROWD NOISE 0 0.0% 0 - 0 -
CONSTRUCTION 10 7.2% 1 10.0% 9 90.0%
OTHER 0 0.0% 0 - 0 -
HONKING CARS 0 0.0% 0 - 0 -
Totals 139 lMIIIIIIIIM 30 21.6% 109 78.4%
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 1 of 2
Time of Day / Day of Week of Call
TOTAL VALID AND NON -VALID CASES
Percentage of total that
Total 7a-11p 11p- 7a (of occurred on that day of
the following morning)
week
Monday 10 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 7.2%
Tuesday 12 5 41.7% 7 58.3% 8.6% 1
Wednesday 12 5 41.7% 7 58.3% 8.6%
Thursday 28 9 32.1% 19 67.9% 20.1%
Friday 25 11 44.0% 14 56.0% 18.0%
Saturday 31 10 32.3% 21 67.7% 22.3%
Sunday 21 17 81.0% 4 19.0% 15.1%
Totals 139 65 46.8% 74 53.2%
VALID
Total 7a-11p 11p-7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 3 10.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0%
Tuesday 2 6.7% 2 100.0% 0 0.0%
Wednesday 1 3.3% 1 100.0% 0 0.0%
Thursday 2 6.7% 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
Friday 6 20.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3%
Saturday 7 23.3% 4 57.1% 3 42.9%
Sunday 9 30.0% 8 88.9% 1 11.1%
Totals 30 21.6% 23 76.7% 7 23.3%
NON -VALID
Total 7a -11p 11p -7a
(of the following morning)
Monday 7 6.4% 5 71.4% 2 28.6%
Tuesday 10 9.2% 3 30.0% 7 70.0%
Wednesday 11 10.1% 4 36.4% 7 63.6%
Thursday 26 23.9% 8 30.8% 18 69.2%
Friday 19 17.4% 7 36.8% 12 63.2%
Saturday 24 22.0% 6 25.0% 18 75.0%
Sunday 12 11.0% 9 75.0% 3 25.0%
Totals 109 78.4% 42 38.5% 67 61.5%
Breakdown of Calls with Identified Complainants and with Anonymous Complainants
Total Cases Valid Cases Non -valid Cases
Total Complaints 139 30 21.6% 109 78.4%
Anonymous Complainant 73 52.5% 8 11.0% 65 89.0%
Anonymous with Contact
made 1 0.7% 0 - 1 100.0%
Contact Information Provided 54 38.8% 11 20.4% 43 79.6%
Internal (Proactive) 11 7.9% 11 100.0% 0 -
Completed by RSA and RM SOURCE: Permits Plus 08/19/2011 Page 2 of 2
D
n
E
rn
rn Np 10 > m
cpMM ERC _ Vq � lp p -i
q� CASs Z m
c
8
to
Tor/It i
Music/ Z
N .
- y prior to ,s° I °wer Z
arrival
co mplai nant
o =o N ° qcc r
- ° cos /gccess D
de n
O
E
No N oise q T A� t'T1
Iv _ 1.) Not aCode /SSUe r
O
Z
ro, � M U s i c/ r
Nois
° t Loud o
kc essive Ud
N A
rn ND gfter 1 1P
audib at 1 M Not
�t. A
N
0D PD _ tV
- I n valid o
c N ° Inf °rm
anon
•
ATTACHMENT G - SPECIAL MASTERS
Information on Disposition of Cases by Special Master and by Judicial (Q2 -2011)
Date of - Request Special Master Code Case Address Name Status
Violation Filed Case Number Number
CB 00018133 / Cust #016066 $2,000, (CB reduced to
04/29/2010 05/11/2010 JC10000494 CE10006233 2120 BAY AV SUNSET 4 Gregory Mirmelli $1,000) 2/3/11 this case was reduced to 2nd offense
pursuant to rulings on JC10000345/JC10000462. Fine
unpaid as of 08/08/2011
1/6/11 - SM Fine $2,000 upheld and shall be paid by
10/01/2010 10/12/2010 JC11000001 CE11000009 655 Washington Ave KM Club LLC 7/1/11 CB 00020277 / Cust#014339 $2,000. Fine
unpaid as of 08/08/2011
(City Bill 000196941 issued to Cust# 016941 for $250)
Fresh on Fifth Pursuant to the Order of the Special Master dated
10/18/2010 10/22/2010 JC11000194 CE11000529 448 Ocean Drive LLC April 7, 2011, (Inspector not present) this case is
DISMISSED, with prejudice. Administrative cost to be
refunded to Petitioner. City Bill to be voided.
2/3/2011 - Determined through clear and convincing
evidence Written Warning CE110004396 issued on
10/20/2010 10/26/2010 JC11000195 CE11000596 125 E San Marino Dr Jeffrey Miller 3/16/10 was invalid, reducing CE11000596 issued on
10/21/10 to a Written Warning. (City Bill 00019671
issued to Cust# 016944 for $250 has been voided)
(City Bill 00020076 issued to Cust# 012513 for $250)
11/01/2010 11/10/2010 JC11000196 CE11000947 613 Lincoln Road Aura Restaurant Petitioner withdrew the appeal at the hearing on
5/5/2011. City Bill paid 6/2/11.
03/03/2011 - Violation was not proven to be valid,
11/07/2010 11/17/2010 JC11000201 CE11001147 1685 Collins Ave Delano Hotel through clear and convincing evidence, appeal
granted, case dismissed. (City Bill 00020078 issued
to Cust# 013810 $250 to be voided)
Mia Bella Roma (City Bill 00020074 issued to Cust# 017036 for $1,000)
11/08/2010 11/10/2010 JC11000197 CE11001196 1236 Ocean Drive Restaurant On 05/05/2011, adjudicated GUILTY of a Second
Offense. City Bill paid on 6/2/11.
(City Bill 00020073 issued to Cust# 017036 for
Mia Bella Roma $2,000). 5/5/11 Violation NOT proven by clear and
11/09/2010 11/10/2010 JC11000198 CE11001259 1236 Ocean Drive Restaurant convincing evidence to be valid. Case is DISMISSED.
Administrative cost to be refunded to Petitioner. City
Bill to be voided.
5/5/11 Written Warning issued under CE10007503
was NOT proven by clear and convincing evidence to
11/29/2010 12/29/2010 JC11000281 CE11001830 1756 Collins Ave Catalina Hotel be valid. Violation CE11001830 is reduced to a
Written Warning. This case is DISMISSED.
Administrative cost to be refunded to Petitioner.
CB #00020657 / Cust 017182 to be voided.
(City Bill 00020658 issued to Cust# 017036 for
$3,000). On 05/05/2011, adjudicated GUILTY but
was reduced to a 3rd offense because prior violation
11/30/2010 12/10/2010 JC11000199 CE11001869 1236 Ocean Drive Mia Bella Roma CE11001259 / JC11000198 was dismissed by the
Restaurant Special Master. The reduced fine of $2,000 shall be
paid by June 2, 2011. Status shows BILLPAID on
Permits Plus.
(City Bill 00020662 issued to Cust# 014626 $2,000)
12/12/2010 12/21/2010 JC11000202 CE11002238 1532 Washington Dream On 07/07/2011, case was DISMISSED. City Bill
CB #00020662 / Customer # 014626 needs to be
voided.
(City Bill 00020895 issued to Cust# 014626 for $3,000)
On 07/07/2011, adjudicated GUILTY of a Third
12/18/2010 12/21/2010 JC11000203 CE11002403 1532 Washington Dream Offense. The fine of $2,000 shall be paid by August 8,
2011. (Not paid as of 8/08/2011).
Carlos Capote & 04/07/2011 - Violation CE11002671 reduced by
12/26/2010 01/05/2011 JC11000273 CE11002671 5924 Alton Road W Mercedes Special Master to Written Warning. (City Bill 00020914
issued to Cust# 013224 $2,000 to be voided)
Andre Burguera 4/7/11 Violation CE11002769 reduced to Written
12/30/2010 01/07/2011 JC11000274 CE11002769 1885 Daytonia Road & W Marie! Warning, case dismissed. (City Bill 00020913 issued
Muniz to Cust# 017297 for $250 to be voided)
4/7/11 Case Dismissed, CCO out of Sick Leave. (City
01/02/2011 01/06/2011 JC11000272 CE11002931 1120 Collins Ave Hotel Nash, LLC Bill 00021246 issued for Cust# 011352 $1,000 to be
voided). Administrative cost to be refunded to
Petitioner. CLOSEDSM in PermitsPlus.
08/19/2011 Code Compliance Division Page 1 of 2
- 1
•
Date of Request Special Master Code Case Address Name Status
Violation Filed Case Number Number
Seth Gissen (City Bill 00021246 issued to Cust# 017352 for $250)
01/02/2011 01/12/2011 JC11000271 CE11002934 700 W Dilido Drive (representing On 05/19/2011, adjudicated GUILTY of a First
property owner Offense. A fine of $250 PAID on 06/30/2011.
Jonathan Rooks)
01/06/2011 01/12/2011 JC11000275 CE11003072 2344 N Bay Road Fredric N Karlton 4/7/11 Case Dismissed. Administrative cost to be
(Trust) refunded to Petitioner.
01/19/2011 01/28/2011 JC11000276 CE11003478 220 Meridian Ave Jayce Jay LLC 4/7/11 Case Dismissed, (City Bill 00021237 issued for
Cust# 017369 $250 to be voided)
(City Bill 00021234 issued to Cust# 017371 $1,000)
01/23/2011 02/02/2011 JC11000277 CE11003619 1 0 Street Seth Alan On 05/19/2011, Case not proven by clear and
Gissen convincing evidence to be valid, case DISMISSED.
Status shows CLOSEDSM on PermitsPlus.
Garden of EDEN
02/04/2011 02/14/2011 JC11000279 CE11004086 210 23rd Street Restaurant dba Set for SM - 09/01/2011
EDEN, SI
On 05/19/2011, adjudicated GUILTY of a reduced
Second Offense because CE11003619/JC11000277
02/12/2011 02/22/2011 JC11000278 CE11004373 700 W Dilido Drive Seth Alan was dismissed. A fine of $1,000.00 shall be paid by
Gissen July 1, 2011. CB# 000226680 / Cust 017352 for
$2,000 issued then reduced to $1,000 as per Special
Master as noted. CB paid $1,000 6/30/11.
On 05/05/2011, adjudicated GUILTY of a Second
02/15/2011 02/18/2011 JC11000280 CE11004455 808 Collins Ave Whitelaw Hotel & Offense. The fine of $1,000 shall be paid by May 16,
Lounge 2011. CB# 00022684 / Cust #014340 $1,000 paid on
5/17/11.
On 07/07/2011, Case CE11003859 dismissed for lack
of prosecution (CCO out on sick leave) and this
SOHO House violation reduced to a Written Warning, and is
02/19/2011 02/28/2011 JC11000408 CE11004575 4385 Collins Ave Beach House, DISMISSED. City Bill CB #00022683 / Customer #
LLC 016657 needs to be voided. Administrative cost to be
refunded to Petitioner.
On 05/05/2011, case NOT proven through clear and
02/23/2011 03/03/2011 JC11000407 CE11004682 1234 Penn Ave Carlos Segui convincing evidence, case DISMISSED.
Administrative cost to be refunded to Petitioner.
Garden of EDEN
03/10/2011 03/14/2011 JC11000405 CE11005439 210 23rd Street Restaurant dba SM - 09/01/2011
EDEN, SI
Garden of EDEN
03/11/2011 03/14/2011 JC11000406 CE11005517 210 23rd Street Restaurant dba SM - 09/01/2011
EDEN, SI
7/7/11 violation CE11006124 reduced to a 1st offense.
SOHO House At the City's request, the case is dismissed. CCO out
03/20/2011 03/30/2011 JC11000640 CE11006124 4385 Collins Ave Beach House, on Sick Leave. Administrative cost to be refunded to
LLC Petitioner. CB #00023885 / Cust# 016657 to be
adjusted from $1,000 to $250.
5/5/11 Violation was NOT proven by clear and
04/09/2011 04/19/2011 JC11000515 CE11007519 1000 West Ave Jill S. Herman convincing evidence to be valid. Administrative cost
to be refunded to Petitioner. CB# 00023796 / Cust#
017364 Voided
5/5/11 Violation was NOT proven by clear and
04/10/2011 04/19/2011 JC11000516 CE11007557 1000 West Ave Jill S. Herman convincing evidence to be valid. Administrative cost
to be refunded to Petitioner. CB# 00023813 / Cust
017364 Voided.
6/22/11 Petitioner shall submit a Memorandum of Law
1625 Michigan to the Office of the Special Master on or before July
05/08/2011 05/17/2011 JC11000642 CE11008839 1625 Michigan Ave LLC dba Mova 22, 2011. The city's response shall be filed on or
before August 8, 2011. CB# 00023604 / Cust 017701
issued for $250.
7/7/11 Notice of Violation for CE11009014 is
Leonard A determined to be valid, through clear and convincing
05/14/2011 05/18/2011 JC11000641 CE11009014 14 S Hibiscus Drive Roudner evidence. Petitioner is adjudicated GUILTY of a First
Offense. Fine of $250 shall be paid by August 8,
2011. (City Bill pending as of 7/15/11)
06/11/2011 06/17/2011 JC11000734 CE11010311 920 N Shore Drive David Wallace Scheduled for 9/01/2011 SM
Floberg
06/18/2011 06/22/2011 JC11000736 CE11010518 1000 West Ave Jill S. Herman Continuance by Dept. Scheduled for 9/01/2011 SM
06/18/2011 06/22/2011 JC11000735 CE11010536 4442 Prairie Ave Paulo Buonfante Scheduled for 9/01/2011 SM
08/19/2011 Code Compliance Division Page 2 of 2