2012-28071 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2012-28071
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE UNOFFICIAL RESULTS OF THE
NOVEMBER 6, 2012 SPECIAL ELECTION FOR THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH BALLOT QUESTIONS, AND DECLARING THE
UNOFFICIAL RESULTS THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the Certification of the Unofficial Results' of the City of Miami Beach
Special Election ballot questions have been received and are attached hereto as Composite
Exhibit "A" and are incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, said Certification reflects that:
Question "A" as set forth below was approved by the electorate of the City of
Miami Beach2;
Question "B" as set forth below was approved by the electorate of the City of
Miami Beach;
Question "C" as set forth below was approved by the electorate of the City of
Miami Beach;
Question "D" as set forth below was approved by the electorate of the City of
Miami Beach.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that having had canvassed the
returns of the November 6, 2012 Special Election of the City of Miami Beach, the City hereby
adopts the Certification of the Unofficial Results of said Special Election and it is hereby ordered
1 Upon receipt of the official results of the November 6, 2012 Election from the Miami-Dade County
Supervisor of Elections, same shall be transmitted to the City Commission by the City Clerk's Letter to
Commission and be made a part of the public records of the City of Miami Beach.
2 The four ballot questions have been lettered "A" "B" "C" and "D" for ease of reference herein and were
not so lettered on the ballot.
that the Certification of the Unofficial Results and this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of
the City Commission meeting as a permanent record of the unofficial results of said Special
Election; and be it further resolved that, as a result of the City of Miami Beach November 6,
2012 Special Election, the votes upon the questions presented reflect the following unofficial
results:
Question "A":
ESTABLISHING CITY CLERK AS A CHARTER OFFICER
SHALL THE CHARTER BE AMENDED TO ESTABLISH THE CITY CLERK
AS A CHARTER OFFICER RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING
DESIGNATED DUTIES, WHOSE COMPENSATION SHALL BE
ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE, AND WHEREBY:
• THE CLERK SHALL BE APPOINTED AND REMOVED BY, AND
ACCOUNTABLE TO, THE CITY COMMISSION INSTEAD OF THE
CITY MANAGER; AND
• POWER TO SUPERVISE AND CONTROL THE CLERK'S OFFICE,
AND TO APPOINT AND REMOVE UNCLASSIFIED PERSONNEL
THEREIN, SHALL BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE CITY MANAGER
TO THE CITY CLERK?
-13,789' YES
9,651 NO
Question "B":
VOTER APPROVAL REQUIRED TO REDUCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
BOARD POWERS AND DUTIES OR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
STANDARDS.
SHALL CHARTER SECTION 1.06 BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE THAT
ANY CHANGE TO CHAPTER 118, ARTICLE II, DIVISION 4 ("HISTORIC
PRESERVATION BOARD") OR TO CHAPTER 118, ARTICLE X,
DIVISIONS 1-4 ("HISTORIC PRESERVATION"), OF THE CITY CODE,
WHICH REDUCES THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD, OR
CREATES LESS STRINGENT HISTORIC PRESERVATION
STANDARDS OR REGULATIONS, SHALL, BEFORE BECOMING
EFFECTIVE, BE APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN A
CITYWIDE ELECTION?
14,026 YES
8,853' NO
2
Question "C":
CHANGE OF FILING PERIOD FOR QUALIFYING PETITIONS
SHALL CHARTER SECTION 6.03 BE AMENDED TO CHANGE THE TIME
THAT A CANDIDATE QUALIFYING VIA PETITION FOR CITY ELECTED
OFFICE MUST FILE SAID PETITION, FROM NO LATER THAN THE
SECOND DAY OF THE FOUR-DAY QUALIFYING PERIOD, TO NO LATER
THAN NOON OF THE 14TH DAY PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF SUCH
QUALIFYING PERIOD?
12,412 YES
8,977 NO
QUESTION "D":
LIMITED WAIVER OF CITY QUALIFYING FEE
SHALL CHARTER SECTION 6.03 BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE THAT IF
COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT HASN'T ISSUED ITS
CERTIFICATE VERIFYING THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF VALID
SIGNATURES ON A TIMELY-FILED QUALIFYING PETITION BY 5:00
P.M. ON THE SECOND DAY OF CITY'S QUALIFYING PERIOD, CITY'S 7
1/2% QUALIFYING FEE SHALL BE WAIVED IF THE SUBJECT
CANDIDATE OTHERWISE QUALIFIES PURSUANT TO CHARTER
SECTION 6.03?
12,095 YES
9,088, NO
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that Question "A" was
approved Question "B" was approved Question "C" was
approved and Question "D"was approved-
,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this lYlhday of November, 2012.
ATTEST:
Matt' errera Bower
Mayor
Rafael Granado
F:\ATTO\TURN\RESOS\Accepting Election Results November 2012.rtf APPROVED AS TO
FORM &LANGUAGE
& EXECUTION
3 J1 Iz
I ATTORNEY qAfE
**Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIANH-DADS COUNTY
We, the undersigned, SHELLEY J. KRAVITZ, County Judge, Chairperson,
PENELOPE TOWNSLEY,Supervisor of Elections,Member,ANDREW S.HAGUE,
County Judge, Substitute Member, constituting the Board of County Canvassers in
and for said County,do hereby certify that we met on the Eighth day of November,
2012 A.D., and proceeded publicly to canvass the votes given for and proceeded
publicly to canvass the votes given for Proposed Amendments to the Constitution of
the State of Florida and referendums on the Sixth day of November, 2012 A.D. as
shown by the returns on file in the office of the Supervisor of Elections. We do
hereby certify from said returns as follows:
NO. I
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE I,SECTION 28
]HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to prohibit laws or rules from
compelling any person or employer to purchase, obtain, or otherwise provide for
health care coverage;permit a person or an employer to purchase lawful health care
services directly from a health care provider;permit a health care provider to accept
direct payment from a person oi•an employer for lawful health care services;exempt
persons, employers, and health care providers from penalties and takes for paying
directly or accepting direct payment for lawful health care services;and prohibit laws
or rules from abolishing the private market for health care coverage of any lawful
health care service. Specifies that the amendment does not affect which health care
services a health care provider is required to perform or provide; affect which health
care services are permitted by law; prohibit care provided pursuant to general law
relating to workers'compensation;affect laws or rules in effect as of March 1,2010;
affect the terms or conditions of any health care system to the extent that those terms
and conditions do not have the effect of punishing a person or an employer for paying
directly for lawful health care services or a health care provider for accepting direct
payment from a person or an employer for lawful health care services;or affect any
general law passed by two-thirds vote of the membership of each house of the
Legislature, passed after the effective date of the amendment, provided such law
states with specificity the public necessity justifying the exceptions from the
provisions of the amendment. The amendment expressly provides that it may not be
construed to prohibit negotiated provisions in insurance contracts, network
agreements, or other provider agreements contractually limiting copayments,
coinsurance,deductibles,or other patient charges.
-- —Yes-forApproval-
No for Rejection 385,890 votes
NO.2
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII,SECTION 6 AND ARTICLE XII,SECTION 32
VETERANS DISABLED DUE TO COMBAT INJURY;
HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TAX DISCOUNT
Proposing an amendment to Section 6 of Article VII and the creation of Section 32 of
Article XII of the State Constitution to expand the availability of the property
discount on the homesteads of veterans who became disabled as the result of a
combat injury to include those who were not Florida residents when they entered the
military and schedule the amendment to take effect January 1,2013.
Yes for Approval 468,458 votes
No for Rejection 24,649 votes
1 1/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 1
*** Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
NIIANfl-DADE COUNTY
NO.3
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII,SECTIONS 1 AND 19
AND ARTICLE XII, SECTION 32
STATE GOVERNMENT REVENUE LIMITATION
This proposed amendment to the State Constitution replaces the existing state revenue
limitation based on Florida personal income growth with a new state revenue
limitation based on inflation and population changes. Under the amendment, state
revenues,as defined in the amendment,collected in excess of the revenue limitation
must be deposited into the budget stabilization fund until the fund reaches its
maximum balance, and thereafter shall be used for the support and maintenance of
public schools by reducing the minimum financial effort required from school
districts for participation in a state-funded education finance program, or, if the
minimum financial effort is no longer required, returned to the taxpayers. The
Legislature may increase the state revenue limitation through a bill approved by a
super majority vote of each house of the Legislature.The Legislature may also submit
a proposed increase in the state revenue limitation to the voters.The Legislature must
implement this proposed amendment by general law.The amendment will take effect
upon approval by the electors and will first apply to the 2014-2015 state fiscal year.
Yes for Approval 340,218 votes
No for Rejection 404,956 votes
NO.4
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII,SECTIONS 4,6 AND
ARTICLE XII,SECTIONS 27,32,33
PROPERTY TAX LIMITATIONS; PROPERTY VALUE
DECLINE; REDUCTION FOR NONHOMESTEAD ASSESSMENT
INCREASES; DELAY OF SCHEDULED REPEAL
(1) This would amend Florida Constitution Article VII, Section 4 (Taxation;
assessments) and Section 6 (Homestead exemptions). It also would amend Article
XII, Section 27, and add Sections 32 and 33, relating to the Schedule for the
amendments.
(2) In certain circumstances, the law requires the assessed value of homestead and
specified nonhomestead property to increase when the just value of the property
decreases. Therefore, this amendment provides that the Legislature may, by general _
law,provide that the assessment of homestead and specified nonhomestead property
may not increase if the just value of that property is less than the just value of the
property on the preceding January 1,subject to any adjustment in the assessed value
due to changes, additions, reductions, or improvements to such property which are
assessed as provided for by general law. This amendment takes effect upon approval
by the voters. if approved at a special election held on the date of the 2012
presidential preference primary,it shall operate retroactively to January 1,2012,or,if
approved at the 2012 general election,shall take effect January 1,2013.
(3) This amendment reduces from 10 percent to 5 percent the limitation on annual
changes in assessments of nonhomestead real property.This amendment takes effect
upon approval of the voters.If approved at a special election held on the date of the
2012 presidential preference primary,it shall operate retroactively to January 1,2012,
or,if approved at the 2012 general election,takes effect January 1,2013.
(4) This amendment also authorizes general law to provide, subject to conditions
specified in such law, an additional homestead exemption to every person who
establishes the right to receive the homestead exemption provided in the Florida
Constitution within 1 year after purchasing the homestead property and who has not
owned property in the previous 3 calendar years to which the Florida homestead
exemption applied. The additional homestead exemption shall apply to all levies
except school district levies. The additional exemption is an amount equal to 50
percent of the homestead property's just value on January 1 of the year the homestead
is established.The additional homestead exemption may not exceed an amount equal
11/09/2012 10:57:30 PM 2
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
AIIANII-DADS COUNTY
to the median just value of all homestead property within the county where the
property at issue is located for the calendar year immediately preceding January i of
the year the homestead is established. The additional exemption shall apply for the
shorter of 5 years or the year of sale of the property. The amount of the additional
exemption shall be reduced in each subsequent year by an amount equal to 20 percent
of the amount of the additional exemption received in the year the homestead was
established or by an amount equal to the difference between the just value of the
property and the assessed value of the property determined under Article V1I,Section
4(d), whichever is greater. Not more than one such exemption shall be allowed per
homestead property at one time. The additional exemption applies to property
purchased on or after January 1,2011,if approved by the voters at a special election
held on the date of the 2012 presidential preference primary,or to property purchased
on or after January 1,2012, if approved by the voters at the 2012 general election.
The additional exemption is not available in the sixth and subsequent years after it is
first received. The amendment shall take effect upon approval by the voters. If
approved at a special election held on the date of the 2012 presidential preference
primary, it shall operate retroactively to January 1,2012,or, if approved at the 2012
general election,takes effect January 1,2013.
(5) This amendment also delays until 2023, the repeal, currently scheduled to take
effect in 2019,
Yes for Approval 352,764 votes
No for•Rejection 355,656 votes
NO. 5
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE V, SECTIONS 2,11)AND 12
STATE COURTS
Proposing a revision of Article V of the State Constitution re-lating to the judiciary.
The State Constitution authorizes the Supreme Court to adopt rules for the practice
and procedure in all courts.The constitution further provides that a rule of court may
be repealed by a general law enacted by a two-thirds vote of the membership of each
house of the Legislature. This proposed constitutional revision eliminates the
requirement that a general law repealing a court rule pass by a two-thirds vote of each
house,thereby providing that the Legislature may repeal a rule of court by a general
law approved by a majority vote of each house of the Legislature that expresses the
policy behind the repeal. The court could readopt the rule in conformity with the
public policy expressed by the Legislature, but if the Legislature determines that a
rule has been readopted and repeals the readopted rule, this proposed revision
---- - - --------- prohibits-ttle-court from-further•-readopting-the-repealed-rule-without-the--L-egislature's--- -- --
prior•approval.Under Current law.rules of-the judicial nominating commissions and
the Judicial Qualifications Commission may be repeated by general law enacted by a
majority vote of the membership of each house of the Legislature. Under this
proposed revision, a vote to repeal those rules is changed to repeal by general law
enacted by a majority vote of the legislators present.
Under current law,the Governor appoints a justice of the Supreme Court from a list
of nominees provided by a judicial nominating commission,and appointments by the
Governor are not subject to confirmation.This revision requires Senate confirmation
of a justice of the Supreme Court before the appointee can take office.If the Senate
votes not to:;.confirm the appointment, the judicial nominating commission must
reconvene and may not renominate any person whose prior appointment to fill the
same vacancy was not confirmed by the Senate.For the purpose of confirmation,the
Senate may meet at any time. If the Senate fails to vote on the appointment of a
justice within 90 days,the justice will be deemed confirmed and will take office.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission is an independent commission created by the
State Constitution to investigate and prosecute before the Florida Supreme Court
alleged misconduct by a justice or judge. Currently under the constitution,
commission proceedings are confidential until formal charges are tiled by the
investigative panel of the commission. Once formal charges are filed, the formal
charges and all further proceedings of the commission are public. Currently, the
constitution authorizes the House of Representatives to impeach a justice or judge.
11/0812012 10:57:30 PM 3
***U * �
nofficial
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
NIIANII-DADE COUNTY
Further, the Speaker of the House of Representatives may request, and the Judicial
Qualifications Commission must make available,all information in the commission's
possession for use in deciding whether to impeach a justice or judge. This proposed
revision requires the commission to make all of its files available to the Speaker of
the House of Representatives but provides that such files �.vould remain confidential
during any investigation by the House of Representatives and until such information
is used in the pursuit of an impeachment of a justice or judge. This revision also
removes the power of the Governor to request files of the Judicial Qualifications
Commission to conform to a prior constitutional change.
This revision also makes technical and clarifying additions and deletions relating to
the selection of chief judges of a circuit and relating to the Judicial Qualifications
Commission, and makes other nonsubstantive conforming and technical changes in
the judicial article of the constitution.
Yes for Approval 274,540 votes
No for Rejection 444,421 votes
NO.6
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE I,SECTION 28
PROHIBITION ON PUBLIC FUNDING OF ABORTIONS;
CONSTRUCTION OF ABORTION RIGHTS
This proposed amendment provides that public funds may not be expended for any
abortion or for health-benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. This
prohibition does not apply to an expenditure required by federal law,a case in which
a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that
would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed,or a case of rape
or incest.
This proposed amendment provides that the State Constitution may not be interpreted
to create broader rights to an abortion than those contained in the United States
Constitution. With respect to abortion. this proposed amendment overrules court
decisions which conclude that the right of privacy under Article 1, Section 23 of the
State Constitution is broader un scope than that of the United States Constitution.
Yes for Approval 337,102 votes
No for Rejection 405,472 votes
NO.8
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDIIIENT
ARTICLE I,SECTION 3
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution providing that no individual or
entity may be denied, on the basis of religious identity or belief, governmental
benefits,funding or other support,except as required by the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution, and deleting the prohibition against using revenues from
the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any church, sect, or religious
denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution.
Yes for Approval 358,939 votes
No for Rejection 363,325 votes
i
i
11/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 4
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
NO.9
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII,SECTION 6 AND ARTICLE XII,SECTION 32
HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVING
SPOUSE OF MILITARY VETERAN OR FIRST RESPONDER
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to authorize the I.,egislature to
provide by general law ad valorem homestead property tax relief to the surviving
spouse of a military veteran who died from service-connected causes while on active
duty or to the surviving spouse of a first responder who died in the line of duty.The
amendment authorizes the Legislature to totally exempt or partially exempt such
surviving spouse's homestead property from ad valorem taxation. The amendment
defines a first responder as a law enforcement officer, a correctional officer, a
firefighter,an emergency medical technician,or a paramedic. This amendment shall
take effect January 1,2013.
Yes for Approval 440,686 votes
No for Rejection 280,281 votes
NO. 10
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII, SECTION 3 AND ARTICLE XII, SECTION 32
TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to:
(1) Provide an exemption from ad valorem taxes levied by counties, municipalities,
school districts, and other local governments on tangible personal property if the
assessed value of an owner's tangible personal property is greater than $25,000 but
less than 550,000. This new exemption,if approved by the voters,will take effect on
January 1,2013,and apply to the 2013 tax roll and subsequent tax rolls.
(2)Authorise a county or municipality for the purpose of its respective levy, and as
provided by general law, to provide tangible personal property tax exemptions by
ordinance. This is in addition to other statewide tangible personal property tax
exemptions provided by the Constitution and this amendment.
Yes for Approval 341,819 votes
No for Rejection 368,158 votes
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE VII,SECTION 6
ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION; LOW-INCOME
SENIORS WHO MAINTAIN LONG-TERM RESIDENCY ON
PROPERTY; EQUAL TO ASSESSED VALUE
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to authorize the Legislature, by
general law and subject to conditions set forth in the general law,to allow counties
and municipalities to grant an additional homestead tax exemption equal to the
assessed value of homestead property if the property has a just value less than
$250,000 to an owner who has maintained permanent residency on the property for
not less than 25 years,who has attained age 65,and who has a low household income
as defined by general law.
Yes for Approval 501,082 votes
No for Rejection 257,588 votes
11!08/2012 10:57:30 PM 5
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
NO. 12
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
ARTICLE IX, SECTION 7
APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT BODY PRESIDENT TO BOARD
OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to replace the president of the
Florida Student Association with the chair of the council of state university student
body presidents as the student member of the Board of Governors of the State
University System and to require that the Board of Governors organize such council
of state university student body presidents.
Yes for Approval 311,845 votes
No for Rejection 401,680 votes
CO. QUESTION: FUNDING FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS
YES 507,325 votes
NO 230,835 votes
CO. QUESTION: TERM LIMITS OF COUNTY COMM.
YES 555,227 votes
NO 16I,615 votes
CO. QUESTION: TECHNICAL AMEND TO CHARTER
YES 447.381 votes
NO 176,692 votes
CO.QUESTION: EXT.VOTE FOR LAND WITHIN UDB
YES 448,278 votes
NO 207,323 votes
CO. QUESTION: MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
YES 343,737 votes
NO 304,563 votes
CO. QUESTION: CITIZENS' BILL OF RIGHTS
YES 339,736 votes
NO 310,3 78 votes
H
CO. QUESTION: MAYOR OR COMM.VACANCY
YES 410,229 votes
NO 249.357 votes
CO. QUESTION: MAYORAL CONFLICTS PROCURE
YES 391,407 votes
NO 260,472 votes
11108/2012 10:57:30 PM 6
*** Unofficial **
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
M1A11II-DADE COUNTY
CO.QUESTION: TENNIS CENTER AT CRANDON PARK
YES 526,447 votes
NO 198.150 votes
CO.QUESTION: ANIMAL SERVICES PROGRAMS
YES 482,243 votes
NO 265,852 votes
CO.QUESTION: BUS.WITH SPONSERS OF TERR.
YES 441,635 votes
NO 265,922 votes
BAY HARBOR: CREATION OF NEW CHARTER
YES 1,373 votes
NO 396 votes
BAY HARBOR: CAND. QUALIFICATION PERIOD
YES 1,251 votes
NO 493 votes
BAY HARBOR: CAND RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT
YES 1,440 votes
NO 301 votes
BAY HARBOR: FREQ. OF COUNCIL MEETINGS
YES 956 votes
NO 750 votes
BAY HARBOR: MANAGER SURETY BOND REQ
YES 617 votes
NO 1,004 votes
BAY HARBOR:RUNOFF ELEC. PROCEDURE
YES 8 1,042 votes
NO 631 votes
BAY HARBOR: INIT. &REF.PROCEDURE
YES 722 votes
NO 929 votes
BISCAYNE PARK: CHANGE ELECTION DATES
11/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 7
t
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIANII-DARE COUNTY
YES 817 votes
NO 466 votes
i
CORAL GABLES: PICKUP TRUCK ORDINANCE
YES 12,548 votes
NO 9,587 votes
CUTLER BAY: TECH.AND STYLISTIC AMENDMENTS
YES 7,859 votes
NO 4,450 votes
CUTLER BAY: MISUSE OF AUTHORITY PROHIBITED
YES 11,342 votes
NO 1,980 votes
CUTLER BAY: MAPS INCLUDED IN CHARTER
YES 9,569 votes
NO 2,812 votes
CUTLER BAY:RECOGNITION_MADE BY COUNCIL
YES 7,092 votes
NO 4,895 votes
CUTLER BAY: VIOLATING CHARTER OR DIRECTIVES
YES 9,633 votes
NO 2,642 votes
CUTLER BAY: QUAL AFTER TERTNI LIMIT
YES 9,308 votes
NO 3,245 votes
CUTLER BAY: TERM LIMITS TO ADDITIONAL TERMS
YES 8,881 votes
NO 3,494 votes
CUTLER BAY: LIMITS TO RES.OF MAYOR,VM,CM
YES 8,700 votes
NO 4,072 votes
CUTLER BAY: STAGGARED TERM LIMIT
YES 6,317 votes
NO 5,953 votes
I
11/08/201210:57.-30 PM 8
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
CUTLER BAY: FORFEITURES OF OFFICE,APP.RES
YES 9,459 votes
NO 2.747 votes
CUTLER BAY: POWERS AND DUTIES OF TOWN MGR.
YES 7,656 votes
NO 4,941 votes
CUTLER BAY: NON-VOTING MEMBERS
YES 5,266 votes
NO 7,085 votes
CUTLER BAY: PROHIB. SVC.ON CHARTER COMM.
YES 8,066 votes
NO 3,784 votes
CUTLER BAY:RESTR. SVC ON CHARTER COMM.
YES 9,043 votes
NO 3,051 votes
KEY BISCAYNE: LEASES OF LAND AND PUB. FAC.
YES 3,229 votes
NO 763 votes
KEY BISCAYNE: RESO APPV BY VOICE VOTE
YES 2,303 votes
NO 1,767 votes
KEY BISCAYNE: SPC.ASSESS.MAIL IN BALLOT
YES 2,998 votes
NO 853 votes
KEY BISCAYNE:PETITIONS AND REF. ELECTIONS
YES 2,861 votes
NO 886 votes
KEY BISCAYNE: ELECTIONS ON CHARTER AMEND.
YES 2,870 votes
NO 856 votes
KEY BISCAYNE: CHARTER REVIEW EVERY 10 YRS.
I I l0812012 10:57:30 PM 9
I
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
YES 1,056 votes
NO 2,770 votes
MIAMI BEACH:: CLERK AS CHARTER OFFICE
YES 13,789 votes
NO 9,651 votes
MIAMI BEACH: REDUCTION OF HPB POWER
YES 14,026 votes
NO 8,853 votes
MIAMI BEACH: FILING PERIOD QUAL.PETITIONS
YES 12,412 votes
NO 8,977 votes
MIAMI BEACH: LIMITED WAIVER OF QUAIL FEE
YES 12,095 votes
NO 9,088 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: CHANGING VILLAGE NAME
YES 1,232 votes
NO 679 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: CORP.LIMITS OF THE CITY
YES 1,157 votes
NO 630 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: APPT AND REM CITY CLERK
YES 1,156 votes
NO 510 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: LIMIT.ACQ. OF REAL PROP
YES 1,065 votes
NO 594 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: MAYOR&COnLMI COMPENS
YES 1,166 votes
NO 568 votes
NORTH BAY'VILLAGE: 2 YR COMPEN.PROHIB.
YES 1,134 votes
NO 595 votes
I
11/08/201210:57:30 PM 10 i
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIAMI-DARE COUNTY
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: CITY MGR OUTSIDE EMPLOY.
YES 1,247 votes
NO 453 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: EXP ANTI NEPOTISM POLICY
YES 1,235 votes
NO 504 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE:VAC.,INTER.VICE MAYOR
YES 1,343 votes
NO 371 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: FILLING COMM.VACANCY
YES 1,248 votes
NO 416 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: EMERGENCY ORDINANCES
YES 15181 votes
NO 516 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: ORDINANCES&RESOLUTIONS
YES 1,202 votes
NO 485 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS
YES 1,444 votes
NO 343 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: NOMINATION FOR OFFICE
YES 1,130 votes
NO 561 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: INCREASE OF FILING FEES
YES 937 votes
NO 782 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: EMP.POLITICAL ACTIVITY
YES 1,094 votes
NO 604 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: FINAL BUDGET MEETING
11/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 1]
***Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
MIANII-DADE COUNTY
YES 783 votes
NO 870 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: BONDS OF OFRS AND EMP.
YES 1,305 votes
NO 345 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: OATH OF EMPLOYMENT
YES 1,473 votes
NO 231 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: ZONING REDS,MAPS, CMP
YES 1,271 votes
NO 372 votes
NORTH BAY VILLAGE: CHARTER VIOLATIONS
YES 1,420 votes
NO 233 votes
OPA-LOCKA: UPDATED CHRTR AVAIL.CLERKS OFF.
YES 2,565 votes
NO 1,451 votes
PALMETTO BAY: NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION
YES 7,092 votes
NO 3,681 votes
PALMETTO BAY:NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS-DEFINED
- YE S _ 6,208 votes -------NO 3.770 votes
PALMETTO BAY:NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS-ENFORC.
YES 6,039 votes
NO 3380 votes
PALMETTO BAY: CHANGING TERM LIMITS
YES 5,122 votes
NO 5,041 votes
PALMETTO BAY: INTERACT.WITH ADMINISTRATION
YES 4,598 votes
NO 4,918 votes
i
11/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 12
*}*Unofficial***
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
11IIAMI-DADE COUNTY
PALMETTO BAY: DEPARTMENT HEAD SELECTION
YES 6,544 votes
NO 3,432 votes
PAL-TETTO BAY: TWO YEAR PROHIBITION
YES 6,319 votes
NO 3,746 votes
PALMETTO BAY: REQ. CANDIDATES RUN INDEPEND.
YES 6,907 votes
NO 3,154 votes
PALMETTO BAY: FILLING OF VACANCIES
YES 4,413 votes
NO 5,445 votes
PALMETTO BAY: ANNEXATION PROCESS
YES 6,893 votes
NO 2,853 votes
PALMETTO BAY: CHARTER REVISION COMMISSION
YES 5,469 votes
NO 4,142 votes
PALMETTO BAY: TECHNICAL&STYLISTIC AMNDMTS
YES 6,645 votes
NO 2,896 votes
PINECREST: COMMENCEMENT OF TERMS
YES 6,757 votes
NO 1,854 votes
PINECREST: BUDGET REPORT
YES 6,717 votes
NO 1,998 votes
PINECREST: LEASES
YES 5,253 votes
NO 3,193 votes
SURFSIDE: PREAMBLE&CITIZEN BILL OF RIGHTS
11/08/2012 10:57:30 PM 13
i
y**Unofficial*�*
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY,CAWASSING BOARD
NILAMI-DADE COUNTY
YES 1,496 votes
NO votes
SURFSIM:MANDATORY CHARTER-REVIEW
1;3.33 votes
NO 629 votes
SURES.IDE: GEN.POW'ER$.RESTRI.CTI:ON ON DEV.
YES. 1,,363 votes
NO .525 vat's
'COUNTY JUDGE, _RSQ,
SUPERVISOR OF E _ GTI NS,N :itIBER
COUNTY J!z f5f,SUN-s- U M FXr-i LR
11/0812012 10:57:30 Pill: 14
I
i
NA A.N I B EAC
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
JOSE SMITH, CITY ATTORNEY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR MATTI HERRERA BOWER
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION
INTERIM CITY MANAGER KATHIE BROODS
FROM: JOSE SMITH
CITY ATTO EY
DATE: NOVEMBER 6,
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UNOFFICIAL RESULTS OF THE NOVEMBER 6,
2012 SPECIAL ELECTION BALLOT QUESTIONS
Attached hereto is a Resolution adopting the Certification of unofficial Results of the August
14, 2012 Special Election for the City of Miami Beach, and declaring the unofficial election results.
The Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Election's Certification of the unofficial results is attached to
the Resolution and, upon the receipt of the official results of the November 6, 2012 Election from the
Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections, same shall be transmitted to the City Commission by
Resolution and be made a part of the public records of the City of Miami Beach.
JS/DT/mmd
F:\ATTO\TURN\COMMMEMO\Comm Memo Reso Accepting Results of November 6 2012 Special Election.doc
Agenda Item Rr) P
Date