2013-28155 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28155
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF
THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF FIRMS,
PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 56-11/12,
FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING AND DOCUMENTING A DETAILED
FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS BUILDINGS/ASSETS
OWNED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, AND TO DEVELOP A
SCHEDULE FOR ASSETS AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITHIN THE
BUILDINGS/ASSETS TO INCLUDE CURRENT AND PROJECTED FUTURE
REPLACEMENT COSTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO
ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALL THREE PROPOSERS:
BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC.; NOVA ENGINEERING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC.; AND VFA, INC.; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS UPON
CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE
ADMINISTRATION.
WHEREAS, On July 18, 2012, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance
of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 56-11/12, for the purpose of conducting and
documenting a detailed facilities condition assessment of various buildings/assets owned by the
City of Miami Beach, and to develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within
the buildings/assets, to include current and projected future replacement costs; and
WHEREAS, RFQ No. 56-11/12 was issued on September 21, 2012, with a deadline for
the receipt of qualification packages of October 23, 2012; and
WHEREAS, a pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers
submitting a response was held on October 5, 2012, and two addenda were issued to answer
questions by prospective proposers, hence postponing the deadline to November 2, 2012; and
WHEREAS, BidNet issued bid notices to 43 prospective proposers and five (5)
proposers downloaded the bid notification, and Procurement sent notice via e-mail to all 44
firms form the City's rotational Architectural/Engineering contract with the intent of maximizing
competition and participation; and
WHEREAS, the notices resulted in the receipt of three (3) proposals from the following
firms: Bermello Ajamil and Partners, Inc., Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC, and VFA,
Inc.; and
WHEREAS, On December 20, 2012, the Interim City Manager via Letter to Commission
(LTC) No. 332-2012, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") consisting of the
following individuals:
• Herman Fung, Contracts Coordinator, Property Management
• Margarita Wells, Environmental Specialist, Public Works
• Gerardo Usallan, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP
• Christi Cvijanovic, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy Graduate
• Guy Simani, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy Graduate
• Glendon Hall, Management and Budget Analyst (Alternate)
• Michael Silverman, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy (Alternate)
WHEREAS, Committee member Gerardo Usallan could not attend the meeting, and was
replaced by Glendon Hall, Management and Budget Analyst; and
WHEREAS, the Committee convened on January 15, 2013 for presentations from all
proposers, followed by a question and answer session, and reconvened on January 23, 2013 for
deliberations; and
WHEREAS, the Committee was instructed to score and rank the proposals pursuant to
the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ, which was as follows:
• 25 Points -The experience and qualifications of the Proposer
• 30 Points -The experience and qualifications of the professional personnel assigned
to the Project Team and the Project Manager, as well as their familiarity with this
project and a thorough understanding of the methodology and approach to be used
in this assignment
• 20 Points - Past performance based on quality of the Performance Evaluation
Surveys and the Administration's due dilligence based upon reference checks
performed of the Proposer's clients
• 5 Points - Willingness to meet time and budget requirements as demonstrated by
past performance, methodology and approach
• 5 Points - Certified minority business enterprise participation. Either the Proposer or
a member of the Proposer's Team may qualify for proof of certification for minority
business enterprise participation. Accepted minority business enterprise certifications
include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade
County
• 5 Points— Location
• 5 Points - Recent, current and projected workloads of the firms
• 5 Points - The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City, with the
object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms,
provided such distribution does not violate the principle of selection of the most
highly qualified firm
• 5 Points— Local Preference for Miami Beach-Based Vendors
• 5 Points— Preference for Florida Small Businesses Owned and Controlled by
Veterans and to State-Certified Service-Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises; and
WHEREAS, the Committee discussed proposer' qualifications, experience, and
competence, and further scored the proposers; and
WHEREAS, a motion was presented by Christi Cvijanovic, seconded by Guy Simani,
and unanimously approved by all Committee members, to recommend entering into
negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc.; and should the
administration not be able to successfully negotiate an agreement with the top-ranked firm,
authorizing the administration to negotiate with the second-ranked firm, VFA, Inc.; and should
the administration not be able to negotiate an agreement with the second-ranked firm,
authorizing the administration to negotiate an agreement with the third-ranked firm, Nova
Engineering and Environmental, LLC.; and
WHEREAS, after considering the review and recommendation of Committee, the Interim
City Manager exercised her due diligence and recommends that the Mayor and the City
Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with all three proposers rather
than only one as recommended by the Committee because of the amount of projects and the
short window (120 days) in which FCAs are to be completed; further authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the
Administration; and
WHEREAS, the list of facilities will be divided based on total square footage as a basis
for negotiations; and upon completion of negotiations, the facility assessments will be assigned
as deemed in the best interest of the City to each proposer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby
accept the recommendation of the Interim City Manager pertaining to the ranking of firms,
pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 56-11/12, for the purpose of conducting and
documenting detailed facilities condition assessments of various buildings/assets owned by the
City of Miami Beach, and to develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within
the buildings/assets to include current and projected future replacement costs; authorizing the
Administration to enter into negotiations with all three proposers: Bermello Ajamil & Partners,
Inc.; Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC.; and VFA, Inc.; and further authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with all firms contingent upon conclusion of
successful negotiations by the Administration.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2013.
ATTEST: , n
��\v`'....3
CITY C RK YOR
:INCORP ORATED:
T:\AGENDA\2013\March 13\RFQ 56- a(Noco n Assessments-Reso.doc
APPROVED AS TO
FORM&LANGUAGE
&FOR EXECUTION
ILP" _� 3 -
City A m Date
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of The City Of Miami Beach,Florida,Accepting The Recommendation Of The City
Manager Pertaining To The Ranking Of Firms, Pursuant To Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 56-11/12, For The Purpose Of
Conducting And Documenting Detailed Facilities Condition Assessments Of Various Buildings/Assets Owned By The City Of Miami
Beach,And To Develop A Schedule For Assets And Equipment Replacement Within The Buildings/Assets To Include Current And
Projected Future Replacement Costs;Authorizing The Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With All Three Proposers:Bermello
Ajamil & Partners, Inc.; Nova Engineering And Environmental, LLC.; And VFA, Inc.; And Further Authorizing The Mayor And
City Clerk To Execute Agreements Upon Conclusion Of Successful Negotiations By The Administration.
Key Intended Outcome Supported:
Ensure well maintained facilities.
Supporting Data(Surveys,Environmental Scan,etc.):The 2009 Customer Satisfaction Survey indicated that 87.2%of residents,
and 85%of businesses rated the appearance and maintenance of the City's public buildings as excellent or good.
Issue:
Shall the City Commission adopt the Resolution?
Item Summa /Recommendation:
The purpose of this RFQ is to select qualified proposers to conduct and document detailed Facility Conditions Assessments(FCA)of
various buildings/assets owned by the City of Miami Beach,and to develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within
the buildings/assets,to include current and projected future replacement costs.The successful Proposer will be required to provide a
thorough FCA of the City owned facilities listed in Appendix A, following the VFA Capital Planning Management Solution software
format currently used by the City for maintaining facility condition assessment data gathered through the facilities condition
assessment process recommended herein.
RFQ No.56-11/12 was issued on September 21,2012,with a deadline for the receipt of qualification packages of November 2,2012.
BidNet issued bid notices to 43 prospective proposers and five(5) proposers downloaded the bid notification. Procurement sent
notice via e-mail to all 44 firms form the City's rotational Architectural/Engineering.The notices resulted in the receipt of three(3)
proposals from the following firms: Bermello Ajamil and Partners, Inc.; Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC;VFA, Inc.
The Interim City Manager via Letter to Commission(LTC)No.332-2012,appointed an Evaluation Committee(the"Committee")to
evaluate proposals received. Following the receipt of proposals, the Committee convened and discussed the proposer's
qualifications,experience,and competence,and further scored the proposers in accordance with the criteria established by the RFQ.
The Committee unanimously recommended to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm,Bermello Ajamil&Partners,Inc.;and
should the Administration not be able to successfully negotiate an agreement with the top-ranked firm,authorizing the administration
to negotiate with the second-ranked firm,VFA, Inc.; and should the administration not be able to negotiate an agreement with the
second-ranked firm, authorizing the administration to negotiate an agreement with the third-ranked firm, Nova Engineering and
Environmental, LLC.
After considering the review and recommendation of Committee, the Interim City Manager exercised her due diligence and
recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with all three proposers;
further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the
Administration.
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
N/A
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account
Funds: 1 $159,000 Property Management Account No. 520-1720-000349
2 $132,000 Property Management Account No. 011-0815-000349
3
OBPI Total $291,000
Financial Impact Summary:
City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:
Alex Denis, Director Ext#6641
Sign-Offs:
De ent Die or Assis j&ot
,Xity Manager City Mana
AD �F JGG PDW KGB
T:\AGEN \2013\March 13\RFQ 56-11-12-Facility Condition Assessment SUMMARY.doc
MIAMIBEX�H AGEiUDA ITEM C DATE 43—/
MIAMIBEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachFI.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Kathie G. Brooks, Interim City Manager
DATE: March 13, 2013
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI
BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE INTERIM CITY
MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF FIRMS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST
FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 56-11/12, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING
AND DOCUMENTING DETAILED FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENTS OF
VARIOUS BUILDINGS/ASSETS OWNED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, AND TO
DEVELOP A SCHEDULE FOR ASSETS AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITHIN
THE BUILDINGS/ASSETS TO INCLUDE CURRENT AND PROJECTED FUTURE
REPLACEMENT COSTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO
NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALL THREE PROPOSERS: BERMELLO AJAMIL&PARTNERS,
INC.; NOVA ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC.; AND VFA, INC.; AND
FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
AGREEMENTS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE
ADMINISTRATION.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
KEY INTENDED OUTCOME
Ensure well maintained facilities.
FUNDING
The amount budgeted for these services for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 is $291,000. Funding in the
amount required will be provided from the following accounts:
$159,000 — Property Management Account No. 520-1720-000349
$132,000 — Property Management Account No. 011-0815-000349
$291,000
Should additional funding be required due to increased need of services, it would be subject to the
review and approval of the Office of Budget and Performance Improvement(OBPI).
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this RFQ is to select qualified proposers to conduct and document detailed Facility
Conditions Assessments(FCA)of various buildings/assets owned by the City of Miami Beach, and
to develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within the buildings/assets,to include
current and projected future replacement costs.
It is extremely important that FCAs be performed on a regular schedule for City of Miami Beach
buildings and assets. These FCAs assist in determining the asset value, replacement cost,and a full
condition report of all systems that support the asset within the asset's envelope.The FCA projects
RFQ 56-11112—Facility Condition Assessments
Commission Memorandum
March 13, 2013
Page 2
timelines for equipment replacement based on condition and lifecycle and projects needed upgrades
within the asset's interior and exterior envelope.
All of this information combined generates the asset's Facility Condition Index (FCI). The FCI is
used to measure a facility's overall condition (excellent, good, poor, or should be demolished)and
provides a monetary investment value needed to bring the asset's FCI to a more desirable rating.
The FCI is also a tool used in the City's Active Strategy Program to track the overall average
condition of the major facilities within the City.
Seven years ago, the City invested in the VFA Capital Planning Management Solutions software
program that, combined with the information collected through the FCA process, provides a tool to
manage and assure that the City maintains all its facilities at the highest possible level of integrity
and functionality.
Additionally, the information gathered from the FCA is critical to an effective facility management
program, and this information can only be attained by conducting thorough facility inspections. The
City does not have the capacity to conduct the required comprehensive inspections itself;thus relies
on outside sources who possess the knowledge and experience to conduct a timely detailed FCA,
and who are knowledgeable and experienced in working with the VFA Capital Planning
Management Solutions software used by the City to manage this data.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The successful Proposer will be required to provide a thorough FCA of the City owned facilities listed
in Appendix A, following the VFA Capital Planning Management Solution software format currently
used by the City for maintaining facility condition assessment data gathered through the facilities
condition assessment process recommended herein.
All inspectors must be certified by the State of Florida to perform inspections for their specific
discipline(s) and must have extensive knowledge of current building code requirements.
All FCAs must be completed within 120 days of the contract award. All data gathered from the FCA
must be loaded into VFA by the successful Proposer within 90 days of completion of such FCA.
The City retains the right to award all, partial, or none of the facilities, or to make multiple awards, if
deemed in the best interest of the City.
RFQ PROCESS
On July 18, 2012, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) No. 56-11/12, for the purpose of conducting and documenting a detailed
facilities condition assessment of various buildings/assets owned by the City of Miami Beach,and to
develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within the buildings/assets, to include
current and projected future replacement costs (the "RFQ").
RFQ No. 56-11/12 was issued on September 21, 2012, with a deadline for the receipt of
qualification packages of October 23, 2012.A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the
proposers submitting a response was held on October 5, 2012. Two addenda were issued to
answer questions by prospective proposers, hence postponing the deadline to November 2, 2012.
RFQ 56-11112—Facility Condition Assessments
Commission Memorandum
March 13, 2013
Page 3
BidNet issued bid notices to 43 prospective proposers and five (5) proposers downloaded the bid
notification. Additionally, Procurement sent notice via e-mail to all 44 firms form the City's rotational
Architectural/Engineering contract with the intent of maximizing competition and participation. The
notices resulted in the receipt of three (3) proposals from the following firms:
• Bermello Ajamil and Partners, Inc.
• Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC
• VFA, Inc.
On December 20, 2012, the Interim City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 332-2012,
appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") consisting of the following individuals:
• Herman Fung, Contracts Coordinator, Property Management
• Margarita Wells, Environmental Specialist, Public Works
• * Gerardo Usallan, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP
• Christi Cvijanovic, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy Graduate
• Guy Simani, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy Graduate
• * Glendon Hall, Management and Budget Analyst(Alternate)
• Michael Silverman, Resident and CMB Leadership Academy(Alternate)
*Committee member Gerardo Usallan could not attend the meeting, and was replaced by Glendon
Hall, Management and Budget Analyst.
The Committee convened on January 15, 2013 for presentations from all proposers, followed by a
question and answer session,and reconvened on January 23,2013 for deliberations.The Committee
was instructed to score and rank the proposals pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the
RFQ, which was as follows:
Total Criteria
Points
25 The experience and qualifications of the Proposer
30 The experience and qualifications of the professional personnel
assigned to the Project Team and the Project Manager, as well as their
familiarity with this project and a thorough understanding of the
methodology and approach to be used in this assignment
20 Past performance based on quality of the Performance Evaluation
Surveys and the Administration's due dilligence based upon reference
checks performed of the Pro poser's clients
5 Willingness to meet time and budget requirements as demonstrated by
past performance, methodology and approach
5 Certified minority business enterprise participation. Either the Proposer
or a member of the Proposer's Team may qualify for proof of
certification for minority business enterprise participation. Accepted
minority business enterprise certifications include the Small Business
Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County
5 Location
5 Recent, current and projected workloads of the firms
5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City,with the
object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified
firms, provided such distribution does not violate the principle of
selection of the most highly ualified firm
RFQ 56-11112—Facility Condition Assessments
Commission Memorandum
March 13, 2013
Page 4
Additional points, over the aforementioned potential points were to be allocated, if applicable and in
accordance to following ordinances.
LOCAL PREFERENCE: The Evaluation Committee will assign an additional five (5) points to
Proposers, which are, or include as part of their proposal team, a Miami Beach-based vendor as
defined in the City's Local Preference Ordinance. No points were allocated to any of the proposers
for local preference.
VETERANS PREFERENCE: The Evaluation Committee will assign an additional five(5)points to
Proposers, which are, or include as part of their proposal team, a small business concern owned
and controlled by a veteran(s)or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, as defined in the
City's Veterans Preference Ordinance. No points were allocated to any of the proposers for
veteran's preference.
The Committee discussed proposer'qualifications,experience,and competence,and further scored
the proposers. The Committee's final rankings are as follows:
FINAL RANKINGS
LOW
Herman Margarita Glendon Christi Guy AGGREGATE
Fung Wells Hall Cvijanovic Simani TOTALS
Bermelfo Ajamil &
Partners 88 1 92 1 (96) 1 (97) 1 (93) 1 (5) 1
VFA, Inc. (79) 2 75 2 (81)2 (87)2 (81)2 10 2
Nova Engineering and
Environmental (78) 3 (67) 3 (79) 3 (78) 3 (74)3 (15) 3
A motion was presented by Christi Cvijanovic, seconded by Guy Simani,and unanimously approved
by all Committee members, to recommend entering into negotiations with the top-ranked firm,
Bermello Ajamil&Partners, Inc.; and should the administration not be able to successfully negotiate
an agreement with the top-ranked firm, authorizing the administration to negotiate with the second-
ranked firm, VFA, Inc.;and should the administration not be able to negotiate an agreement with the
second-ranked firm, authorizing the administration to negotiate an agreement with the third-ranked
firm, Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC.
COMPANY'S PROFILE
BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS (B&A)
Founded in 1939 (incorporated under its current name in 1992), B&A is an A/E firm providing
complete planning, design and construction services in the disciplines of architecture, engineering,
planning, interior design and landscape architectures since 1939. B&A maintains a staff of over 86
personnel,and has extensive experience in providing plans review and building inspection services.
For over 12 years, B&A has been the Building Code consultant for the Miami-Dade County School
Board. B&A has also worked on all types of projects with municipalities, local and state agencies
throughout South Florida, including among others: Miami-Dade County, City of Miami, City of Fort
Lauderdale, Port of Miami, City of Miramar.
RFQ 56-11112—Facility Condition Assessments
Commission Memorandum
March 13, 2013
Page 5
VFA, INC. (VFA)
VFA was founded in 1998, and employs over 100 experienced building analysts, which are
comprised of project directors, project managers,architects,electrical and mechanical engineers with
an average of 20 + years experience. Some of the representative clients in addition to the US
General Services Administration include U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery; the States of
Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana and Missouri; and the Cities of New York, Houston, Kansas and Calgary
among others.
NOVA ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
Nova was established in 1996, and currently employs approximately 150 personnel in 11 offices,
consisting of registered engineers, certified plans examiners and inspectors,geologists and specialty
consultants. Nova provides similar services to State of Florida Department of Corrections, State of
Florida Juvenile Justice, City of Fort Lauderdale,City of Naples,and Miami-Dade Community College
among other agencies.
MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE
After considering the review and recommendation of Committee, the Interim City Manager exercised
her due diligence and recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the
Administration to enter into negotiations with all three proposers rather than only one as
recommended by the Committee because of the amount of projects and the short window(120 days)
in which FCAs are to be completed; further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an
agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration.
The list of facilities will be divided based on total square footage as a basis for negotiations. Upon
completion of negotiations,the facility assessments will be assigned as deemed in the best interest
of the City to each proposer.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach,
Florida accept the recommendation of the Interim City Manager pertaining to the ranking of firms,
pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 56-11/12, for the purpose of conducting and
documenting detailed facilities condition assessments of various buildings/assets owned by the City
of Miami Beach, and to develop a schedule for assets and equipment replacement within the
buildings/assets to include current and projected future replacement costs; authorizing the
Administration to enter into negotiations with all three proposers: Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc.;
Nova Engineering and Environmental, LLC.; and VFA, Inc.; and further authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute agreements with all firms contingent upon conclusion of successful
negotiations by the Administration.
T:\AGENDA\2013\March 13\RFQ 56-11-12-Facility Condition Assessment MEMO.doc
RFQ 56-11112—Facility Condition Assessments
Commission Memorandum
March 13, 2013
Page 6
APPENDIX A- List of Facilities scheduled for FCA
Facility Description Facii ity Description
1 10th Beach Patrol 37 Byron Carlyle Theater
2 10th St. Auditorium 38 Carl Fisher Clubhouse
3 12th Street Parking Garage 39 City Hall
4 13th Street Parking Garage 40 Colony Theater
5 14th. Street Beach Restroom 41 Crespi Park Building
6 16th Street Parking Garage 42 Electrowave Building
7 16th Street Parking Garage 43 Fire Station 1
8 17th Street Parking Garage 44 Fire Station 2
9 21 t Street Community Center 45 Fire Station 3
10 42nd Street Parking Garage 46 Fire Station 4
11 777 Building 47 Flamingo Pool Facility Buildings
12 7th Street Parking Garage 48 Fleet Maintenance Shop#1
13 A-555 Building 49 Fleet Maintenance Shop#2
14 A-Beach Restroom No. 1 -3rd Street 50 Fleet Maintenance Shop#3
15 A-Beach Restroom No. 2 -6th Street 51 Garden Center Buildings
16 A-Beach Restroom No. 3- 10th Street 52 Historic City Hall
17 A-Beach Restroom No. 4- 14th Street 53 Historic Fire Station 2
18 A-Beach Restroom No. 5-21 st Street 54 Lummus Park Beach Restroom
19 A-Beach Restroom No. 6- Men -46th Street 55 Marine Patrol Building @ Bay St
20 A-Beach Restroom No. 6-Women -46th Street 56 Miami Beach Golf Clubhouse
21 A-Beach Restroom No. 7- 53rd Street 57 Miami City Ballet Building
22 A-Beach Restroom No. 8- Men -64th Street 58 Muss Park Building
23 A-Beach Restroom No. 8-Women -64th Street 59 Normandy Golf course Clubhouse
24 Acorn Band shell 60 North Shore Band shell Building
25 Acorn Theater 61 North Shore Open Space Park Restroom # 1
26 A-Fairway Park Pavilion 62 North Shore Youth Center
27 A-Normandy Isle Park Pool 63 Old Library Building
28 A-Normandy Shores Park Restrooms &Storage 64 PAL Building
29 A-North Shore Open Space Park Pavilion No. 1 65 Police Garage
.. 30 A-North Shore Open Space Park Pavilion No. 2 66 Police Station
31 A-North Shore Open Space Park Pavilion No. 3 67 Public Works operations facility
32 A-North Shore Open Space Park Restroom No. 68 Sanitation Storage
2
33 A-North Shore Open Space Park Restroom No. 69 South Shore Community Center
3
34 A-Scott Rakow Community Youth Center 70 Stillwater Park Building
35 A-South Point Police Substation 71 Tatum Park Building
36 Bass Museum