The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-28237 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28237 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR (FY2013-2017 ) CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED FORM; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND TO SUBMIT THE FIVE-YEAR (FY2013-2017) CONSOLIDATED PLAN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD). WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach is an entitlement recipient of federal formula HUD grant programs as follows: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and HOME Investment funds (HOME), and the City expects to continue to receive entitlement funds from these grant programs to operate the City's housing and community development activities; and WHEREAS, the Five-Year Consolidated Plan is a federal requirement for all HUD entitlement cities; and WHEREAS, the attached Five-Year (FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan is the City's long-term plan on how it intends to use federal CDBG and HOME entitlement funds for Fiscal Years (FY) 2013/14 through 2017/18, and WHEREAS, this Plan has been prepared in accordance with HUD's national guidelines and describes our community needs, resources, priorities, and proposed activities to be undertaken with CDBG and HOME funding; and WHEREAS, actual detailed implementation strategies are not reflected in these plans, but are left to individual jurisdictions to undertake, as outlined and adopted in their One-Year Action Plan, which outlines the entitlement community's housing and non- housing community development needs, priorities, and proposed use of funds for the ensuing program year; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive planning phase was initiated by the City on March 28, 2013, when the City's Request for Proposals for CDBG, HOME and SHIP funds was made available to the public; and WHEREAS, a separate CDAC meeting was held on May 8, 2013 to review and discuss the Five-Year (FY2013-2017) Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, a public meeting was held on May 8, 2013, and a draft Five-Year (FY2008-2012) Consolidated Plan was made available to the public for a 30-day comment period from May 6, 2013, through June 4, 2013; and WHEREAS, while CDBG funds are primarily used to provide vital public services, housing activities, code enforcement, public facilities, youth centers and senior centers, HOME Program funds have been used for affordable rental housing activities and first time homeownership opportunities; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is the HUD designated agent for all formula grants, and executes the grant applications, the Agreements, and other applicable HUD documents on behalf of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that Mayor and City Commission authorize the adoption of the Five Year (FY2013-2017) Consolidated Plan for Federal Funds, in substantially the attached form; and further authorize the City Manager to execute all applicable documents and to submit the Five-Year (FY2013- 2017) Consolidated Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. PASSED AND ADOPTED this S fh day of 7titie , 2013. ATTEST: CITY LERK = R .INCORP ORATED;( G_7 TAHGENDA\2013\June 5\Copy of Fed Consolidated&Action �e5o ac APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION \Z0 Ci om (� Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution Adopting the City's Five-Year (FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan for Federal Funds. Key Intended Outcomes Supported: Sustainability initiatives. Affordable housing for the labor force. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Based on the 2012 Community Satisfaction Survey, 66% of residents gave the City positive marks for its efforts to be a green or sustainable. 34% of businesses rated lack of affordable housing in Miami Beach for their labor force as their most important challenge. Issue: Shall the City adopt the Five-Year(FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan in substantially the attached form? Item Summary/Recommendation: The Five-Year (FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan is the City of Miami Beach's long-term plan on how it intends to use federal CDBG and HOME entitlement funds for fiscal years 2013/14 through 2017/18. This plan has been prepared in accordance with HUD's national guidelines and describes our community needs, resources, priorities, and proposed activities to be undertaken with CDBG and HOME funding. Actual detailed implementation strategies are not reflected in Five-Year Consolidated Plans, but are left to individual jurisdictions to undertake as outlined and adopted in their One-Year Action Plan, a HUD requirement which outlines the entitlement community's housing and non-housing community development needs, priorities, and proposed use of funds for the ensuing program year. Advisory Committee Recommendation: The Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) met and addressed these issues as follows: • January 24, 2013 - met to discuss Five-Year (FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan: May 1, 2013 - heard 19 oral presentations from applicants for CDBG and HOME funding; • May 8, 2013 - reviewed and recommended funding for FY 2013/2014 One-Year Action Plan; • A Public Meeting was held on May 8, 2013. A draft Five-Year(FY 2013-2017)Consolidated Plan was made available for a 30-day comment period from May 6, 2013 through June 4, 2013. Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 N/A 2 11 OBPI Total Financial Impact Summary: Federal CDBG and HOME funding will be allocated to the City of Miami Beach and the City will allocate the FY 2013-17 entitlements. City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Maria Ruiz x6491 Sign-Offs: De artment Director Assis nt i ana er City Manager T:\AGENDA\2013\June 5\Copy of Fed Consolidated&Action PI n Summary.doc 91 M AGENDA ITEM � DATE 6-S-13 ® MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of th City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 5, 2013 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYO AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR (FY2013-2017) CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR FEDERAL FUNDS IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED FORM; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND TO SUBMIT THE FIVE-YEAR(FY2013-2017)CONSOLIDATED PLAN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD). ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS The Five-Year Consolidated Plan is a federal requirement for all U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement cities. The City of Miami Beach is a HUD-designated entitlement city, as determined by the decennial census information on population growth lag,over- crowding, age of housing stock, and poverty. The City of Miami Beach has been a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement community since 1975. As an entitlement city, the City of Miami Beach automatically qualifies for an annual allocation of federal funding under HUD's grant programs. The annual allocation of funds, or One-Year Action Plan, is one component of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan. FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN The current Five-Year(FY 2008-2012)Consolidated Plan was prepared in 2008 was prepared by a consultant at the cost of $35,000. In 2011, in preparation of the upcoming next five-year cycle, representatives of US HUD announced that the next round of five-year plans were to be created using HUD's Integrated Disbursement Information System(IDIS) program. Consequently, city staff attended HUD training and webinars. The attached proposed Five-Year (FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan was prepared by city staff using the IDIS program, as required. The proposed Five-Year(FY 2013-2017) Consolidated Plan is the City of Miami Beach's long-term plan on how it intends to use federal CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership Program(HOME)entitlement funds for fiscal years 2013/14 through 2017/18. This plan has been prepared in accordance with HUD's national guidelines and describes our community needs, resources, priorities, and proposed Commission Memorandum Five Year Consolidated Plan June 5, 2013 Page 2 of 2 activities to be undertaken with CDBG and HOME funding. This document must be submitted to HUD by August 15, 2013. Actual detailed implementation strategies are not reflected in Five-Year Consolidated Plans, but are left to individual jurisdictions to undertake as outlined and adopted in the One-Year Action Plan, a HUD requirement which outlines the entitlement community's housing and non-housing community development needs, priorities, and proposed use of funds for the ensuing program year. As an entitlement community, funding comes to the City's Housing and Community Development Division to "develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low-income and moderate income persons." The HOME Program, also funded by HUD,was started in 1992 to provide a block grant specifically for affordable housing. HUD allocates these funds "to strengthen public/private partnerships and to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing with primary attention to rental housing, for very low-income families." CDBG funds have been primarily used to provide vital public services, housing activities, code enforcement, public facilities, youth centers, and senior centers, while HOME funds have been used for affordable rental housing activities and first time homeownership opportunities. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the attached resolution adopting the City's Five-Year (FY2013-2017) Consolidated Plan in substantially the attache rm. AV JLM/K /AP T:\AGENDA\2013Uune 5\Copy of Fed Consolidated&Action Plan Memo.doc ATTACHMENT /OIAMIBEACH FY 2013-2017 Consolidated . Prepared by: City of Miami Beach Office of Real Estate, Housing and Community Development City of Miami Beach FY 2013 — 2017 Consolidated Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. The Process 4 Lead & Responsible Agencies Consultation Citizen Participation 2. Needs Assessment 11 Overview Housing Needs Assessment Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion Public Housing Homeless Needs Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment Non-Housing Community Development Needs 3. Market Analysis 37 Overview Number of Housing Units Cost of Housing Condition of Housing Public and Assisted Housing Homeless Facilities Special Needs Facilities and Services Barriers to Affordable Housing Non-Housing Community Development Assets Needs and Market Analysis Discussion 4. Strategic Plan 59 Overview Geographic Priorities Priority Needs Influence of Market Conditions Anticipated Resources Institutional Delivery Structure Goals Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement Barriers to affordable housing Homelessness Strategy Lead based paint Hazards Anti-Poverty Strategy Monitoring Appendices Eligible Block Group Map Demographic and Housing Data Miami-Dade County People Living with HIV/Aids Through 2012 Map Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary 1. Introduction The City of Miami Beach's FY 2013-2017 Consolidated Plan represents and summarizes the objectives and outcomes identified by citizens, advisory committees, public service providers, community development corporations and City staff. The overall goal of the community planning and development programs covered by this plan is to develop and redevelop viable urban communities by: 1. Providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for low-and moderate-income persons.The primary means towards this end is to extend and strengthen partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for-profit and non-profit organizations, in the production and operation of affordable housing. Decent housing includes assisting homeless persons to obtain appropriate housing and assisting persons at risk of becoming homeless; retention of the affordable housing stock; and increasing the availability of permanent housing in standard condition and affordable cost to low-income and moderate-income families, particularly to members of disadvantaged minorities, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability. Decent housing also includes increasing the supply of supportive housing, which combines structural features and services needed to enable persons with special needs, including persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, to live with dignity and independence; and providing housing affordable to low-income persons accessible to job opportunities. 2.) Providing a suitable, sustainable living environment includes improving the safety and livability of neighborhoods; increasing access to quality public and private facilities and services; reducing the isolation of income groups within a community or geographical area through the spatial deconcentration of housing opportunities for persons of lower income and the revitalization of deteriorating or deteriorated neighborhoods; restoring and preserving properties of special historic, architectural,or aesthetic value; and conservation of energy resources. 3.) Expanding economic opportunities includes job creation and retention; establishment, stabilization and expansion of small businesses (including microbusinesses); the provision of public services concerned with employment; the provision of jobs involved in carrying out activities under programs covered by this plan to low-income persons living in areas affected by those programs and activities; availability of mortgage financing for low-income persons at reasonable rates using nondiscriminatory Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 1 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) lending practices; access to capital and credit for development activities that promote the long-term economic and social viability of the community; and empowerment and self-sufficiency opportunities for low-income persons to reduce generational poverty in federally assisted and public housing. Our Mission We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work, and play in our vibrant,tropical, historic community. Our Vision The City of Miami Beach will be: • Cleaner and Safer; • More Beautiful and Vibrant; • A Mature,Stable Residential Community with Well-improved Infrastructure; • A Unique Urban and Historic Environment; • A Cultural, Entertainment,Tourism Capital; and • An International Center for Innovation in Culture, Recreation and Business. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview Objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan include: • Public Facilities and Improvements • Senior Centers • Drainage improvements • Public Services • Youth services • Senior services • Childcare • Homeless services • HIV/AIDS services • Housing • Construction of housing • Homeownership Assistance • Energy Efficiency Improvements • Multi-Family Rental Rehabilitation • Code Enforcement • Economic Development Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 2 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 3. Evaluation of past performance The City has met frequently with the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee to evaluate the past performance of activities and agencies funded by the City. Activities funded by the City benefited low and moderate income individuals, households and neighborhoods. In order to meet the needs of low and moderate income youth, a new Boys and Girls Club Center is being built in the South Beach Target Area. In order to meet the needs of low and moderate income seniors, the Jewish Community Services Senior Center is being renovated and a new Senior Center was built in the North Beach Target Area. In FY 2011/12 CDBG funds provided public service funds that benefited 5,855 people. Finally, Miami Beach CDC has rehabilitated/built over 500 units of affordable housing since 1998. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City consulted with CDAC,AHAC,the Miami-Dade Homeless Trust, public service providers and community development corporations to identify outcomes and objectives in the Plan. 5. Summary of public comments An ad was placed in the Miami Herald on May 5, 2013 announcing a 30 day comment period.A public meeting was held on May 8, 2013. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them There were no comments or views that were not accepted. 7. Summary The City of Miami Beach's FY 2013-2017 Consolidated Plan represents summarizes the objectives and outcomes identified by citizens, advisory committees, public service providers, community development corporations and city staff. The City consulted with CDAC, AHAC, the Miami-Dade Homeless Trust, public service providers and community development corporations to identify outcomes and objectives in the Plan. The City will leverage its entitlement funds with other government funding and private sector financing to meet the outcomes and objectives in the Plan. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 3 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency Lead Agency City of Miami Beach Real Estate, Housing and Community Development Table 1—Responsible Agencies Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Brian Gillis, Community Development Coordinator, 305-673-7000 x 6120, briangillis @miamibeachfl.gov Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 4 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) a M U ca v ++ 'O U y m 'L L Q C. ±' CUv .a cv a, v L Ln E 0 0 > U O Lam' o CL -0 oa > Q c •� 00 O C c E t 0 N 'a c O ou > a� c 'y to c6 m m 00 c M c 0 4° Q u > a> > .0 c L += 3 0. .o o. v U c Q Q a m L ++ Q Y o m c a C E a 4a C Q U O C O N � dl t o ` O 'u -0 'n O c w > N V 4J in L Q e u M L aci ca u E o C. = ai a u 6 ;,; f n o 1 ` > O h C v O V aJ N c � V N cu E c +. m a)_ oj E N C 75 m u C o v o aJ a O c Y a m L " E E 4' t U .O � _ ? y U 3 n N aJ C d U C u u aJ O Ln a U Q z x '++ p 3 ° 030 o to L u a� E m d o L o a>i c0 v y c a` c 'Z l7 � E H = v or aJ a1 L O > H IA m •E a) O u a) Oa 7 m of JA C O U 4! 2 b O N N ++ m c N C_ O to u Q to `� L = a w Ln _ •� +� m E = E ti4 o o v N L C ++ O C L 3 y (C � >� O t+ (J L- o O ++ o c GJ C L O L O 3 Z O p 3 +� O L VC � E ego E �, 2 I- a m u = H u a c +J ,a) ei U , 4J U c • • • s • • • • • • • • • o 0) CL E L a) 3 O L 0t0 00 a ..4 ►— cn oa H ns 0 v c � ` � v o o ror M W a O ,r M N Ln 4i L C > Co a L a a O a a O f+6 ° C +' '�' L 'E +L+ V _r_ j L LA L to vi 4- Cl C C� `-, m C L u ,un O u N c a 'U °- x E a N a a 'O CA Y 0 U •' Q Q O ; v — f0 O N N V1 41 3 :A O u O E C E — E '� i C L lD U a E �, v •Eb > E ,� `� a s m f- C L C o a o (U � Y E ° N C N a C ,A CA a`, O a Q 'a � '�^ u O f9 _� �_ 0 ate., '° a a E �p v� O O N `-' N N u N N 4' ro C E C E E .o �° a C °' O E O N O a a o O CP 7 a a a M a - ip = a u a c L CL E a 3 a N 3 E M 1 ° -° a E 0 O. C C � v O 41 ~ p v cn L >O > � L c m 0 to m vi a `� O ` T O ra a c GJ t a c a' a v N s C -C ° ° O ° � O c `°L-E O o m ;1 O u ?O E c t ao O 'C m a a a vai o '^ N a C _� _~ m m Q 00 C p E UO L o a -° o cCC > ° > a n. w a c C E — -° w CL u N L C in vi in E E a a 3 - N c ° N ro o 0 0 a s a ao Q a ° a o 11 t td N � d C N E 'O uj m a C N L a C 'f+ C O O a N a a a m "d O L U a C lal 0 " a C N 3 4- `� 'O a L O L i.+ C E N U E C O fD y 'O " O m E cv o O E C vNi O _a U v r° 3 � � 2 C cC0 '� v �° u m ,� T a 3 a N I c a U t0 N LU 0 C C a L O O O o o 2 O C V O O 00 40 i do E ~ E ° N L c CL d L L a a � fU0 a O C it ro o E N u Q 0 .n � OU 3 CA ~ � C � O OA 4-1 E a v U LO N OCA O > g E o o c ro N L .� L � E 3 O �p 'O N h0 U C N Ln N d4 to O O t d E ,F °' E c c to a v a v as °; _ c � E E ° v c 'c �o -g N � O -d N L m N O °u u 3 ra o a 'u a s > Q c v a u au t °, CO L no a E aci ° s a a; � m cco u a N ° v ` c L N — c a o a u -0 to a) E m V +1 N m a N �o C c c +� a ai i ,F 1 �' C N a a e on o `° O 0 3 N H O -o `A ,� a' � -o v — v � �o O 3 E_ ~ LA 0 12 a+ v E o N > a I j E v +° O o w L 3 LO N M C N +a+ V ~ i+ o ~ 0'c OA 4- E -w N a O N L Y N a O L c CA M L v O E CL Y O N '00 U a +L+ Ou L C d to E r s E a c a u E a � c = - A 3 3 to v m o r 2 m C O O O c -0 to N ": (u � O N = u a YO - a '° n O v ° M a E E c L Ln ci v^ v cv 3 0 fl `� f° a `° c > �^ ° m 00 u 4- E 'd > a s c CA C ` ° O o = a c c ro ±' A 3 E v Oc O C 'a a C ° � .E ',� ~ E a m a o Ln t m o C 4J p > L m C N N a E M c C to L a U L O` � `~ N Ln u ° -a a O ,r- rua a s O h 1/f a C a C L a O a N `1 m L C Z OJ GJ m m C p y L E C m v 3 O U •"C H t t F- OA _ v O E E E m o o a m a L 4 u > c •E W 4- �- O a 'O L � O C7 O — aJ vi Vf L�J C C: .N C O W M1• C O c O GJ 4J O O +, i+O GJ O 3 C N O C O a+ m ++ L + -' ro �' 4- 4- O O c .O vt C W 4+ Q ` �= M c d `~ N C Ln 3 C £ O O 7 GJ u •� 4+ 3 U C v N *' -O C O a � C V •m O > 7 c H t0 H Oc 7 ` 'd G` GJ GJ m +� c E u 3 •°' 'L c °c° v CU O a c Q -a O � O •L ` c o w E m aJ 4.- c 41 +, y = v 0 on � ro IA M a a v aJ Ln +, >- 0 w a a E C of y vJ w L- 75 7S O O O .3 a N E +�+ Q m c' C C j a0+ u N u y 4, O O O GJ CL GJ v - LJ = ° t to a -a o a c c N r o m a m c m o .o � (U u 3 3 u 3 c a 3 O E .0 w > ° y E " LA c 3 m p c °' c E 'u m m v a GJ m o u GJ v E(U S m - vt 'p 2 n to -0 M �, 0 = Q t%1 Q °u c a a o ° ° .° aa, u 2 � O L tlo u O Ln > V c LJ > GJ G Q. n• W QJJ -O C N ul C +, c 3 n > H > c t O i ++ a E GJ 'i GJ rp N �+ O +' c 'O m O GJ O 'n } !1 Z L O a c O aJ m Q u a GJ C Z m a aJ > C w.2 cu L GJ E v v Q ''' > o c c', E u `J o +, Y 3 u � � a u +, E o 0 0 N m O 'Q Ou '� _ M O O' .0 M >' j N E O C GJ O. C 0 C)c '� °' _ 0 GJ m -°a ` H > m m c m CL +t+ cO •� L O C ++ G GJ C � O of L1 O E � v -a " 3 10 +, GJ V C O Y M N L •C N C LA E E O O y 4 s O 0 � C O y tiff C d N O v t0 C7 GJ ~ C C E \ Q O GJ > C c cn ±� �; a w O O M CL > a ` C O O E 3 a! u E m c 3 H a W LA Ln > > O vJ v, O O C U w a G1 a > 'r uu � C O in .0 O \j, tiA O 0 vn %A 4: 0 p 0 c u c -0 v v w _ w v c c GJ O E is r Y +� c N t u .� Q .� VN y to a caa v n 3 w ho •°0 Z Z Z j Z c ai °c E cco .� .? u �� Q z z V)i V) v o LA z � a a G�i c m c a o Ln Ln C t c ° `° -° a`, -a o °- M m a f6 a 2 GJ o ,� +, 2 en .� s ? -o C u m u -a +, M Ln GJ u a N . I p c w u c n u O On M c u O0 ui a O u O GJ L- O c O f0 m c > v ++ c m i u Q +, •` DO O GJ M M O C GJ GJ a v 0 u cc E u m v' N \ u Q o vii O m u " c a = O 'u 2 a u ") GJ O O w 0 0 CL O O \ co Z c' > > +� tuv v I E Q u Q o 'v N U u 7 4- > IA Q o C GJ Ou N w w O Q Z m H O M u +, +L+ fl. N 0 Q) M1• Vf H N Vf H L C 4! a1 4J N C A C C C C O O C OD OQ OD OD C d � .N •� •N •� O m O u -C t r t •fC0 O 9 O y O O 00 OD O C w C C O 0) CL t L L CL E ++ O 3 fl. •� C C C O O ` 'O C C c N a; 0 m v v d 7 N V DJ 5 to 7 � O CM u rn u Ln Ln t f�0 C C C C O O Q 3 G O O 4+ L Ln m ++ v1 i- of r-% IA 2 3 3 v 3 ai 3 v d 3 c c I x EA c � C- O u D� in a� Ln N N = Q Q H Q m a � 0 c (A t ±r .t n• to 3 O v o W 0 v Z y c O c m Ln c OD ri Z r j Z :. u ' OY D O O N s+ N +' 2 U N W N IA Z 47 O w D1 w 4J m C Q W M C vi > > O > 7 04 a- w v m w O N °c° x o o o o L o O m L 41 DJ L rn N y .0 CL 2 ,n Q x in E °�' �, c a ai ?� a O o N o �, c o ,n c o �, C x Ln Z m 2 Q a Q Z Q Q Z Q o c m O C y m O c i=+ O c GJ N N •m ++ O L C C C Q •Q OD C 0 m ` }' O O O L O ai rn o 'rn a En N C N C N d .O CL D) j.., J 7 O > C N Q1 C 3 >' a Ld m O O 'O O a C " C L C e0 G o W -o E� O v v N 0 " U L 2 W W m w a ) L O U O U O d Si L" O V) � Ln OD Sn m 0 ra O CL) r- D! C y C C u u u _u u L u_ u _u O •� _u O cv O O a o 2 z L 2! 2! 2 M OD = Z aD Z OD O c > vii rn in Lo th Z rn to 0 rn m to cn M a m o a 14 c > c v ° Ln ro m _u N m w w Q. = n N L C F- w �` O .0 •� ++ G U 0 In d OQ N u O O ~ w Z u O (L)�- �? rn Q U C U I C O. O 'O o u U Z O Q o O m Q Ln C7 o LL Q m Q m v0 C ° H Lu m Z U L OD x D 0 V L 1 C r0 co w Z Q � o d N N 7 j. -p r Z rc 3 o r Q o x o m x Q O -O Z co 0 A• _� L a C f6 ++ (O m > CL V +. c D u ai N t0 4- E p N a two N E o .V N O > fC O O � L 0 L CU on C C L C Q M > m U +' W O of 4-7 O O L O d a C ° �n d tjo m LA CL f° '^ a a a 3 �' m a ° : o a c c w m x o •tw N o o �°° O > a -0 '^ +; c Q u 0 LL O >- c is 0 o m o '�° ,� O. - n o .1 in CLO ^ kn ai v eo c a a m c > O a 00 c a +, Q O o �, •a �_ 40 c L " .3 o D a N r3 °V c c -o a c +' a.+ c OA ,� ~ 3 -0 ° c a c f° w ro to c x � y a +s-' m O 0 0o x C. p ca m E v, C `� -o a t o U a +, a c d :O a c C a a � w c co 0 d 7 = 4 m to CL C La, E c k a c � c m u y L Q t .0 � Q a � c vi N 3 U m c o 2 4, O cn _ 3 4, x � �, o � d v� u , V 0 0 c a a v c � = r. c a a U H H H n O C tco 0 v O ° 3 w a Y p, +, #A cu p .L in Gl N T L L L F L 4! O N +T+ F u u u O U s u c y y 4 ra � �o m m m Q m 3 ° L c O a c _ ►- eo -o �_ R T c o o w 3 c C. j o 2 2 M 0 ,� � 4- O � c a c E N o 0 0 2 0 :o 0 0 t� a ++ O w \ L.! 0 cc a M ++ 'p 0) Ou =) 41 .-i m -W a O. -p 0 N = n c 'O O \ c c c G l0 U Ln x O a c > v c a to > a ++ = v 4 W ° a O 'w a i m ++ ++ w U D. f0 '^ >' L O O •y 0 > c C. a`� c 2 LO L a o �, c 7 v1 0 �; O. 0 \ c E c °1 O C o +� l7 ry Ln co u M j t o Q E LL °' °� c z° O Z cu S U ro m c Y a U CL -- E > O v v a r-4 (A x p o to .E u° 0 O O � dD OA L m u u u ca m E E tt LM ra E E � 3 3 3 z 3 0 +' v m O c M vl v a 3 E w 4' m .E E E v v u LA o R E E -o o E c Q Q 0 Z Z Q. 'u a+ -p L � fu > C O v v O 2 u C tuD E °' E v v � E ° E o - ar c :3 E O �' E v E v C f0 a+ p v O u 0 u CL V u a U Z z O Q :' w m O _ m a +� m c E 0 m - N Q C. o E u c cu > a m v m m L m m +-' O L O O E Z a v ' to 41 3 v im, a c +1 o ui a V) O m E > M 3 0 a CL E a M `o E o ++ v Q =aj o Z Q. O v CL c C p a a O t ,- t ro m a ;, 4+ O u _ u ra O O O 0 CL m 41 4-0 rlj C L 04 C 4-ep C \p C m '� m Q' N V r L 3 N 01 (V O H O v E v E a) E u m c ao E c mo E c tin E ,, un a 0 o O 0 0 o c > a O C 0 Z '' u Z 4r u Z ,.' u O a' n a L N V CL lao O G1 N j c o- 4- O m a E L o v U NN m w f0 w Q + w c 'L a 'p i m V m aJ Z f0 = p ++ u a o a, E C I E N v fD N U d .-i vOi u a z O 2 0 Needs Assessment NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview AHAC, CDAC,the Committee on the Homeless, subrecipients and City staff identified the following housing and community development needs: • Public Facilities and Improvements • Senior Centers • Flood Drainage Improvements ;ublic Operating Costs of Homeless Programs • Services • Youth services • Senior services • Childcare services • Homeless services • Services for people with HIV/AIDS • Housing • Construction of Housing • Homeownership Assistance • Energy Efficiency Improvements • Rehabilitation: Multi-unit Residential • Code Enforcement • Economic Development Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 11 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment Summary.of Housing Needs There are a total of 20,050 low to moderate-income households in Miami Beach, representing nearly 45% of the total households. Given the overall strength of property values, it creates significant cost burden and overcrowding problems. Many large lower income households are forced into rental communities with limited options for affordable units with 3 or more bedrooms. Data in this section has been provided by US HUD. Once new data is made available,the Plan will be updated.Additional data is provided by a Housing Study Update which was completed by a consultant in May,2012. Demographics 2000 Census(Base Year) 2005-2009 ACS(Most Recent %Change Year) Population 87,933 87,677 -0% Households 59,723 44,593 -25% Median Income $27,322.00 $41,892.00 53% Table 5-Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data 2000 Census(Base Year) 2005-2009 ACS(Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table 0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100% HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI Total Households * 7,415 5,285 7,350 4,250 Small Family Households * 1,070 1,325 2,180 7,760 Large Family Households * 30 85 165 825 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 1,225 765 815 375 2,180 Household contains at least one person age 75 or older 2,490 1,250 795 475 1,435 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger * 515 345 630 2,500 * the highest income category for these family types is>80%HAMA Table 6-Total Households Table Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 12 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) °LD v ° kDD o ° � .� lqt m 0 m ri H ao o Ln O Ln ul O 00 Ln O Q 00 A m ` O O O O O O CU O - 01 c 00 O O Q Ln A O O O O r4 k.0 O - 01 V M Q A - O O � O O� 0 r4 m O � n LO LOD Om N 01 N •'' c-1 Ln Ll1 O H H = U Ln Ln Ln :5 °� m O N NO 001 co O O ri r4 r-4 00 L � N t V1 00 Q Q C v n 'V► 0J O c e to Ln Ln O O O _ b (D O � N i O O 0000 O Ln CU N Q N w y n C. t a.r O a° � O O C O O m 01 LD L °� LM C ri c M Q O H t n a� i �O 3 Ln Ln Ln L/1 O O 3° N m n 0000 c La OJ C o H Ln Y m O 1� n m = - r-I C E 'A i N 0D t _ _ N O c > v c Q + ` G1 p O H N p O of O O N-0 E CL 3 °J v o a a E ° 10 c a, �° o c v ° u M o = a, Y 0 E � � a c E � Ln cc o -0 om C o w es ID 0J -60 O' L GJ L2 Ou O' O 0 c H c -0 ` N c -0 ` ? `�" °n L0 �+ > -0 O Q O O. O N o °o O L v c Q v o u s Lca a, u s cco v O a, ,� Z to o c u c 6, > f° o Ln v a an > Oo �' > a°Ai c Z r-I C ;4 c D z v v .1 y c 4! -0 c v .On C C N ° C O u 'u ° p O °> o 0 v c 0> p u� co LA r4 CL 0 _ O o O O o o to to f0 00 0*1 tD t0 M r, M ct O N O � M N N 14 ql:: 1O O H O V1 O O Ln 0000 > A Q N u1 O to to to ° O O O c m m u1 lc:r q:T Ict 01 00 00 2 r-I � O A O°0 Q L Q C A Q C u1 to O Q Ict r-4 0 Ln V A Ln Q _ ( C O N C Ln u to o o ° Q 0 e' N M O ° � O to O Ln 00 M *' _ O to O Q M Y O 00 to m O I Y O u � oo Qi m � o J d m to O O O N u1 u1 In O In �o m 00 N � C m O a�-1 u1 1, L f°Y1 A Q N (D M N u1 er-1 A d O .0 0 .�, C O O O O a ~ u to CL C 4 ° C* kD C m W ba M � u°A1 00 Q M C m 7 O 2 ° Ol O^ 0) 00 ;1- Q LO C14 iJ O u1 O co a. N M It N > M O 2 tD M 47 O°O a--I N J2 dl (n A u1 Q N m Ln Q H L F ` C cu O ° O O O ON rn � O to O O to L - fr1 a M r-4 a° Ol In t0 N O o eri � M Q O A L E 4! 3 O 0 0 u, Ln o Ln o 00 m o M �n -a 0 v ° a to to 0 0 CL to O Ln CL E o 0 to en = o i• 4 N U 7 30 4J 0 Q Q O o Ln ci V CN L Q V o u C > axi 01 C O 3 OA C ° O E o O N n o aJ a>i ai O O s M °u ° u 1= to � `~ C 7 Ln C vi o 0 f0 O in O °o C °o P4 dA E L ry •a 'O > ry O a c L v N O p Ln tuD > two o C 9 r-I c O ++ ` m OJ OJ ``' Z 3. in O d4 00 L ° Or CC >, C c o O C C_ W o � — o M O i > '> 7 441 m O co `0 OJ = Y m a 5 2 OJ m m O 4 o U E m �' O m o N O 2 2 2 0 o of w w O H o 0 O O O O O LPL M to r- O is O H O O LPL Ln O L11 M -* m N C — N M N Ol Ln ¢10 ` Ln Q N A C 3 O 0 0 Ln O Ln oN tD �4 rn o - Ln g en Q A — ....-... _--....._... 00 en Ln O O o Ln Ln tD M r-I O M O i m O O LPL O 1� tD Lr1 m tD A CLO f0 C H M � U 00 Q _ W ,e m G Ln O Ln O O Al/ Q -I 1- M � O ON r-4 a 1 t0 O 4 i Y j e f'�= r 00 2 ri ai :cam 11 ©.J Ln Q c d O o m m tD 00 m N f� O O O O O O m i, M m O 0 41 M O O O f+ M M M m r+~i a n A A z3 n �., c C .r-, 0 c' o - Ln O N U M •>, •?, �, M 0 x O E cn rn �° �° �° rn c C > a, A C N m in N m m O M P� C o C o"a _0 n N o -o N N Lv M ++ ry L- 1 �O 1�(Q1 M 00 In N f C O U CU 41 V V ,�- M 4Q yM N U Z m >- ` C V N Q A C c tA v1 — v LC GD N r .� 0 U E "M � +� y0 0 0 u LPL J Lu O O a0 O Ln O O Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln O O Ln _ Ln Ln O °no O va to . a+ o - 0 0 o O a coog 3 c a 0L o — � o o M a A O O O O O g M a O Ln Ln 0 0 l0 M qcT Rt m O C H E S- w a°. O O M N C U O p N to A 'i a m LU 3 o � o Ln Ln o g C op C , oa A J3 m H ao Ln O Ln O o LO M N N Ln m a E O 0 Ln O Ln O L ao r-I M lD —4 p N M � M c Q. O a C O � C 4J m Q a ,n O o CO CU O 0 m rI m C Ln -0 L ,n 'D L :2 C O x 0 Ln a ++ t `T O N C > y r E 0 0 c J, o (V E 0 0 > N UD to y , N c_ v co o m Q! = C N Z 3 Q L c 'o 0 Ln U c O o 4' m u° in s O H o m Lri 2 0 What are the most common housing problems? The most common housing problems are cost burden and overcrowding. Affordability of available housing in both owner and rental markets is the most common problem. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? In Miami Beach lower income residents, larger families, elderly residents, and minorities are more affected by housing problems. Neither renters nor owners are exempt from experiencing the affects of housing cost burden. More than 25%of total households have an income cost burden greater than 30%; and nearly 15%of households have an income cost burden greater than 50%. Overcrowding is primarily experienced by renters. Most available affordable rental properties are apartments/condominiums and are limited in square footage and the number of bedrooms. Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income)who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)).Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance Characteristics and needs of low income individuals and families with children who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered include loss of employment, underemployment and lack of access to affordable child care. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: Data sources to generate the estimates include the Continuum of Care Plan and HMIS reports. Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness Cost burden has been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 17 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Discussion It is important to stress that cost burden poses a significant deterrent to providing appropriate housing for both renters and owners. Nearly 45% of all households are at or below 80%AMI and nearly 17% of all households are at, or below, 30%AMI, represented by a significant number of elderly residents. Half of the households at or below 30% AMI have a household member over 62 years of age; and 33% of those households have a member over 75 years of age. This means a significant number of households may be on fixed income and unable to keep up with the rising cost of properties. Miami Beach has enjoyed a real estate market that has retained strong market values despite the general downturn in the national real estate market. This fact creates limitations on homeownership opportunities. Virtually all of the single-family homes are financially inaccessible by households that are even at 100% AMI. Ownership is generally left to the acquisition of a condominium; and even that is prohibitive in many of the properties. This issue has created a "double-edged sword" for the City as it struggles with providing affordable housing without negatively impacting rising property values. Overcrowding is also a housing problem on Miami Beach.This is a more significant problem in the rental market than the ownership market. Many of the available rental multifamily properties on Miami Beach are apartments or condominiums with limited square footage and bedrooms. Most are efficiencies, one, and two-bedroom. This creates a significant problem for a large number of families that require 3 or more bedrooms. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 18 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction Miami Beach residents with the greatest need for housing assistance are those households that experience housing cost burden and those that experience overcrowding. According to the CHAS data, Hispanic households make up 59% of the 18430 households that have at least one housing problem, followed by White households at 36%, and Black households at 3%. However, within each of those ethnic groups, approximately 77%of that group's total households have at least one housing problem. 0%-30%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 5,495 1,145 770 White 1,840 320 335 Black/African American 130 0 75 Asian 35 0 90 American Indian,Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 3,380 825 240 Table 12-Disproportionally Greater Need 0-30%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room,4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,770 515 0 Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 19 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems White 1,260 95 0 Black/African American 75 0 0 Asian 75 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 3,220 405 0 Table 13-Disproportionally Greater Need 30-50%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room,4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 50%-80%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 6,100 1,250 0 White 2,485 330 0 Black/African American 285 0 0 Asian 45 65 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 3,255 855 0 Table 14-Disproportionally Greater Need 50-80%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room,4.Cost Burden greater than 30% Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 20 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 80%-100%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 2,065 2,185 0 White 970 845 0 Black/African American 25 75 0 Asian 0 55 0 American Indian,Alaska Native 0 40 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 1,070 1,105 0 Table 15-Disproportionally Greater Need 80-100%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room,4.Cost Burden greater than 30% Discussion Although it can be seen that within the three largest racial/ethnic groups that there is a similar experience with regard to at least one housing problem; examination by the level of income uncovers more of a disparity. Hispanic households that have income of less than 30%AM[; represent 61% of the households with at least one housing problem within that income category. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 21 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction Severe housing problems are generally defined as those households that experience overcrowding and cost burdens of more than 50%of income. Those households with lower income generally experience a disproportionately greater housing need. Hispanic households make up 59% of the 11760 households that have at least one severe housing problem, followed by White households at 35%, and Black households at 3%. Within each of these ethnic groups, approximately 49% of that group's total households have at least one severe housing problem. 0%-30%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 4,395 2,240 770 White 1,665 500 335 Black/African American 130 0 75 Asian 35 0 90 American Indian,Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 2,505 1,705 240 Table 16—Severe Housing Problems 0-30%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room,4.Cost Burden over 50% 30%-50%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing. no/negative problems problems income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 3,655 1,630 0 Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 22 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems White 1,005 350 0 Black/African American 30 50 0 Asian 65 15 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 2,425 1,205 0 Table 17—Severe Housing Problems 30-50%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room,4.Cost Burden over 50% 50%-80%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 2,790 4,560 0 White 1,120 1,695 0 Black/African American 145 135 0 Asian 10 100 0 American Indian,Alaska Native 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 1,485 2,625 0 Table 18—Severe Housing Problems 50-80%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room,4.Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 23 Rev 517 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 80%-100%of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of Has none of the Household has four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income,but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 920 3,325 0 White 370 11445 0 Black/African American 10 90 0 Asian 0 55 0 American Indian,Alaska Native 0 40 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 1 550 1,630 0 Table 19—Severe Housing Problems 80-100%AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room,4.Cost Burden over 50% Discussion Again, although it can be seen that within the three largest racial/ethnic groups that there is a similar experience with regard to at least one severe housing problem; examination by the level of income uncovers more of a disparity. Hispanic households that have income of less than 30% AMI, represent nearly 57%of the households with at least one severe housing problem within that income category. I Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 24 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction There are two important factors when measuring affordability: income and housing price. Cost burden is considered a problem when housing cost exceeds 30% of income, and a severe problem when the cost burden exceeds 50%. According to the CHAS data, 22805 households experience housing cost burden, which is 50%of total households. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <-30% 30-50% >50% No/negative income(not computed) Jurisdiction as a whole 20,935 10,995 11,810 850 White 11,085 4,910 4,665 410 Black/African American 245 265 255 75 Asian 335 145 110 90 American Indian,Alaska Native 75 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 Hispanic 8,840 5,605 6,525 240 Table 20—Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Discussion According to the CHAS data, Hispanic households make up 53%of the 22805 households that have a housing cost burden problem,followed by White households at 42%, and Black households at 2%. However, within each of those ethnic groups, approximately 50%of that group's total households have a housing cost burden problem. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 25 Rev 5 1713 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need With regards to housing problems versus severe housing problems, the data delivers similar results for each category on Miami Beach. The Hispanic population represents the largest share of the affected population. This ethnic group comprises more that 50% of the total population of Miami Beach. Nearly 60% of Hispanics are impacted by at least one or more of the housing problems, which suggests that housing has an overall impact on 35% of the City's total population, while considering only one ethnic group. The only other large group is the White population, which comprises more than 30%of the total. Its representation in the data with regards to being impacted by at least one housing problem is just slightly more than its population size. The Black/African American population is the largest of the other racial/ethnic groups, comprising about 4% of the total population, and representing approximately 3%of the population affected by at least one housing problem, depending on the percentage of AMI level. Needs not previously identified NA Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? Many of the Hispanic and Black residents are located in the North Beach and South Beach neighborhoods, which are community development target areas. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 26 Rev 517 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) C) 0 0 0 � f 2 2 § / k m cW JA § 0 c o 0 0 § § cu :,. .2 E § � 3 CL M E & 0 �2 � 2t � CL> M C14 tA @ 2 f ƒ ° - @ k / tw k Ln &/ a w o § E q CL 22 » � � > � LA CL 0 7 . . . 22 q 2 / k � ~ c ( . ° & 2 g E E CA : m % r-4 E . 2 q - � � � 2 0 � �� I -0 � .0 r- C to m � "i 2 A E ; ° m a c m CL k 4- CL _ k c / u to jE E - c E < o M 2 m LU tA ( 0 § ¥ m m _ 2 a ■ @ F \ < 22 ALL / � k I E 0 3: k 2 macV c _ : / \ 2 fcu .0 q - C) . . / / . $ w C o L - 2 ® [ 6 m k ) f 2 w e 0 0 0 at5 k ■ / 2E o p / A © ° ) w X05 m Get 0Rg 3 _0 0 k2 = � k -D q \ _ � $ \ E 0 2 } $ E > 2 Ln cL 2 ƒ % / k � 0 � � / u � u nm7 5 m _ $ 2 26§ 0 § 7 / 0 Ln g 0 0 ° » ° � / § £ W § w w w _k 0 m � ] 2 E E E _ 0 / # / k 2 2 > > > z / £ § t o Q « « < 0 0 M o 0 0 d d m * m * JA 0 r u o c o 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 >, 0 E > o N +' f0 N �• +' M A u e0 � EL A. r= o °• m 10 u 00 +� o d LL a d LL a N 0 ro •N N M •y N N 0) O CL C C .-I 0• C h ? 00 Ln N N p = r c .� N ` ,� O N ` O N Q = M a 0 > > > a _ N N N lD Ol O O M lO M Ln t0 cp a+ 01 LO f0 vhf ri N a C y a � y C C m H O E d m ~ to tO c» O O O M O d cu °' a .� E C a= c o c 'a a ` M 0) N O O '` y ICT V-4 N � 0 00 Z � a .. . i �.i c a O 0) H H V E f0 'o E o Q W m = ~ m O 00 .-i Ln r-I LO O O > m O to 2 a - c -4 d C a Q ,A > a CL _ o u c � o0 0 m 7 0 � N d o O r•i Cn LO O O A 'C = ` 00 00 O ai t m u o r ai O O O O O O > 1 � C N N u y m a; O O O o u N ate+ Ln m u u fO C c d . m "O o CL 13 m 4! rn Go E — m d o ^ rn C t m 00 o c c a a� N Ln c > a 0J L 0D u N OI U 00C 'O oA rr � O M ° C u E o M CL m ID m O Ll ` N E C Ln CA o� >, O) U }, Y u Z N u N u C� 'D _� •E > Q u Q O m in C W LL N S •V 3 0 O Y Y C c O 2 O A O O u O O C m m 2 'ZA u 0 0 0 0 0 0 V M g - g - \ ° c o 0 o k c o 0 2 § ■ . § § � 2 on o - M _ ■ o k 0 M k CL q 2 � w CL 2 7 _ 0 00 _CLr _ 2m \ Ln � &- 5 i 3 2 CU > 0 CL 0 > � \ � o o . f \ M k ~ s a CL 22 $ E Em 2 7 >. 0 0 0 / § ¥ m & © o � CL © 0 u 0 b 7 � t o � £ _ CL £ CLI k � k 2 E o o z m IL � 2 2 2 7 $ 2 _ I E o _ E k = k @ 2 0 ■ § m o k0 0 k = I 0 0 o I ° u to LL r-4 I - E E b q - E 0' � � g% k � § >- M . . . . � 0 0 0 ui 0 � � gg q m 2 2 0 = w eq w k � � o � ■ o 0 o E E ■ m ■ o o m d f C r f c ' 3 2 u C 2 E § 2 ) 2 k $ q » k \ 2 » 2 } » Ln CL > . ■ o a - e \ CL cr- � § a ° a m z o 6 Ln i M @ § g CL I k k / / 2 M 0 - s . / k 2 3 ƒ 2 k § % 0 Section 504 Needs Assessment Needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units The most immediate need is the availability of accessible units. The Rebecca Towers South development contains ten Section 504 accessible units and is in compliance with Section 504 UFAS accessibility requirements. Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders The waiting list for Rebecca Towers South consists of 679 applicants, of which 99% are extremely low income.The waiting list consists of 67 applicants with disabilities,equivalent to ten percent. The waiting list for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program consists of 1871 applicant households. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large The public housing tenants/Housing Choice Voucher holders and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units have a greater need than the population at large due to housing options limited by their low incomes and the City's low vacancy rate. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 30 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 2 FA 0 o m 0 0 0 0 k 4A U / 7 40 C / ) U mgkE - » 2 ■ _ \ ƒ UJ o 3 @ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 2 I ■ e m q E to E W u o © $ 2 >. 2 4.- m - - o k P k 0 2 E / aj a o 0 C. 0 o 0 o 0 a � k 2 w ■ E E k m 0 k 2 \ ( a c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 k E E § ■ ■ k �_ S � 2 c e 2 CL E a _ g e I / (U ui ° 2 u LU rn 0 (N 2 / k (N o r,4 4--° 0 k E 3 _ 2 0) ■ . CL Ln m . 2 . © k m / § k 2 q \ q 7 ~ % q $ Lo - - - E § > m$ § o 2 b M ' -0 Ui X E \ % c M 2 3 E _ \ f e k > o u R /d \4A 2 / E $ m k M £ 2 E § _ = 3 F # » 2 f ■ c \ \ % ƒ ƒ \ % \ f / f LA � 2 © x / ƒ - k o 0 6 IA 0 k > k 2 E \ k E � % $ $ 5 5 > a Q 4 -C Ln E c A L \ 2 a ƒ I / § § / I k /Ln a) ■ I I c E CL z© © m � +1 � § § E - a m p % / / k 2 / 2 \ § / / / / 0 k � � \ c ° ° 2 § \ B B ° Q § { / � 2 § § § 12 S 3 \ \ I 2 co Z £ em e � z % 7 2 LM 0 / ■ u e k CL E § 2 � a k ° / 2 / 00 m . _3 41 / a c m o q m k § \ ■ e f o � \ 2 3 M � % m ƒ CL / E £ t \ m \ - E o I C \ / w o U J E ■ 0 / � _ 0 G Q f 2 E \ c / § © = c \ c c 2 2 k q ■ 0 - a) § 2 $ U 0 41 w / J u 0 M / E u co k to ' / 2 m k / uj r c u 0 0 0 o § OA � § a / u E 0) > ® § 2 E % ■ & k 0 f \ In J k 0 E E E _ c CL 2 u / 2 k 2 _ ® k = § � q c ± § S § m m W / % . % \ CO @ ■ , R o c E 4 3 E a j 2 k 2 k § ■ = ƒ § i ° ■ ■ / 2 u F7 f =3 m Q $ q » k cu c w M 0 k % \ � \ 2 � k § k m w m 5 a > ( � > a k CL a C \ / u c \ 2 0 F E q - 2 5 ( , ® � 3 ° 5 § § 0 G k 2 k 2 a £ § ..4a 0\ / � 2 c M _E q � z_ 0 m 4 ■ e 1 \ . .� 2 / U ■ 4a c _ , R o ■ ma > E cu a k LL w co m K 4- 2 / 00 2 Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group Data gathered through the January 24, 2013 Point-In-Time count indicated that of those unsheltered persons in Miami Beach, 3.6 percent are unaccompanied youth, 7.1 percent are veterans and 65.3 percent are chronically homeless individuals, 1 percent are transgendered individuals and 6 percent of the homeless population are couples. Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness, including Rural Homelessness Discussion The January 24, 2013 Point-In-Time Count resulted in 3,734 sheltered and unsheltered homeless people in Miami-Dade County. Of that number, 839 were unsheltered.The City of Miami Beach had the second highest homeless concentration in the county with a count of 138 people. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 33 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment Introduction The Non-Homeless Needs Assessment describes: • The characteristics of special needs populations; • The housing and supportive needs of these population and how the needs are determined; The characteristics of persons with HIV/AIDS. Characteristics of Special Needs Populations Characteristics of people with special needs populations include the following: • Elderly • Frail elderly • Severe mental illness • Developmentally disabled • Physically disabled • Persons with alcohol/other drug addictions • Victims of domestic violence • Persons with HIV/AIDS Housing and Supportive Service Needs and Determination Housing needs of these populations include affordable housing and ADA accessible housing. Supportive services of these populations includes senior services, meals and other public service programs. The housing and supportive service needs of these populations were determined by analysis of census, ACS and CHAS data,consultations with CDAC, HACMB, and public service and affordable housing providers. Public Size and Characteristics of Population with HIV/AIDS Miami Dade County continually ranks in the top metropolitan statistical areas for HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence. The State of Florida CDC's most recent monthly surveillance report shows that Miami Dade County reported 246 new HIV diagnoses in the first quarter of 2013 alone, up 17% from the first quarter of 2012. Miami Dade County also reported 131 AIDS cases during that period, up 12%from the first quarter of 2012. The CDC estimates that Miami Dade County was home to 26,456 persons living with HIV/AIDS(PLWHAs) as of 2/28/2013. Within Miami Dade County, Miami Beach's 33139 zip code ranks in the top three zip codes of highest reported HIV and AIDS cases through 2012. The Miami Dade County Health Department estimated that there are between 1,006 — 1,884 PLWHAs living in the Miami Beach area (33139); this Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 34 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) represents between 3.8-7.1% of all PLWHA in Miami Dade County.[2] The same report estimates another 194—384 PLWHAS in the 33140 zip code,for a total of between 1,200 and 2,268 PLWHAs in the City of Miami Beach. According to the 2010 US Census QuickFacts for the City of Miami Beach, there were an estimated 89,840 residents of the city in 2011.[3] Taken together, these numbers show that PLWHAs represent between 1.3-2.5%of the population of Miami Beach. Individuals living with HIV and AIDS are representative of the population as a whole, but some groups are more at risk than others. These individuals have some unique social, demographic, and economic characteristics which make them a special population with high need for social and community services. The AIDS rate is declining over time while the HIV diagnosis rate remains constant; this means that there are constantly increasing numbers of individuals who are living with HIV.[4]As of 2010 PLWHAs identified as 58% Black/African American, 33% Hispanic,7%White and 2% Discussion The Non-Homeless Needs Special Needs Assessment has determined that there is a need for affordable housing and supportive services. The City is partnering with the HACMB and public service and affordable housing providers to address these needs. The City and its partners have developed strategies and will leverage CDBG and HOME funds to address these needs. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 35 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs Public Facilities The City is building a new senior center in North Beach target area, a new youth center at Flamingo Park and is rehabilitating the JCS Senior Center on Espanola Way. Need Determination Meetings with CDAC and Public Meetings. Public Improvements There is a need for drainage improvements in flood prone areas of the City. Need Determination Meetings with CDAC and Public Meetings. Public Services • Youth services • Senior services • Childcare • HIV/AIDS programs • Homeless programs Need Determination Needs were determined be meetings with CDAC, service providers and Public Meetings. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 36 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: Miami Beach has experienced a more successful economic condition than many other South Florida jurisdictions during the recent housing market crash and national recession. The housing market in Miami Beach continues to experience growth in development, which points toward a clear sign of market recovery. Most of the new starts, however, are in multi-family, condominium properties; in many eases high end properties. The slowdown in the housing market is the result of the tightening of credit and underwriting standards and the sub-prime mortgage market crash, and the tightening of credit and underwriting of commercial loans to real estate developers. Despite this downturn,the median home price is$374,600,which is well above the national average. Median rent, based on the 2009 ACS data, is $887. This bodes well for the rental apartment industry, as more households will opt for renting versus buying. However, this creates upward pressure on rental rates, which results in fewer available affordable units. Larger households and low-income households face problems with locating affordable units that meet their size and income needs. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 37 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-10 Number of Housing Units Introduction The predominant type of housing in Miami Beach is multifamily; with properties of more than 20 units representing 62% of total residences and properties with more than 5 units representing 82% of total residences. When comparing tenure type, 62% of owners have units with 2 or more bedrooms, while 75%of renters have units with one or less bedrooms. All residential properties by number of units Property Type Number % 1-unit detached structure 6,567 10% 1-unit, attached structure 960 1% 2-4 units 3,756 6% 5-19 units 13,057 20% 20 or more units 40,447 62% Mobile Home, boat, RV,van, etc 115 0% Total 64,902 100% Table 28—Residential Properties by Unit Number Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Unit Size by Tenure Owners Renters Number % Number % No bedroom 1,228 7% 6,322 25% 1 bedroom 6,298 33% 12,818 50% 2 bedrooms 5,949 32% 5,322 21% 3 or more bedrooms 5,395 29% 1,261 5% Total 18,870 1010/0 25,723 101% Table 29—Unit Size by Tenure Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Number and Targeting of Units Federal and State funding will target households with income up to 80%AMI;and State funding (up to the maximum 30%of funds allocation)will target households with income up to 120%AMI. Units Expected to be lost from Inventory There is no expectation of a loss of existing affordable units. However, given the growing population, coupled with a housing market that encourages the development of market-rate units; for the number of affordable units to remain static will effectively create a reduction in overall units based on need. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 38 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The shortage of housing that relieves the cost burden experienced by many households continues. Likewise,overcrowding due to the lack of availability of larger(multi-bedroom) units is an unmet need. Need for Specific Types of Housing There is a need for units that relieve cost burden and overcrowding. Discussion Due to the current condition of the real estate market which places demand on high end properties,the need for affordable units, particularly ones that meet the space requirements of larger low-income families,will remain difficult to satisfy.The rental market,which many low-income families must rely on, is feeling greater upward pricing pressure due to more families being forced out of the buying market due to tighter credit standards and loan underwriting standards. A summary of housing supply is: • Low percentage of homeowners compared to the national average • High vacancy rate, due in part to the nature of Miami Beach as an entertainment and vacation destination • Strong dominance in the housing mix by condominiums, particularly in residential towers • Substantial share of housing units do not feature two or more bedrooms and thus are not ideal for households with children • Majority of the housing stock built prior to the 1970s but is steadily being rehabilitated or replaced • Only a very low number of housing units are in substandard condition • Median condo and single-family home prices have declined significantly since 2008 but are now recovering • Median monthly rents are increasing and not affordable to a majority of Miami Beach residents • The rate of home sales increased by 70 percent from 2008 to 2012,indicating healthy housing demand • Market Action Index of 18.67 indicates that Miami Beach is a buyer's market Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 39 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-15 Cost of Housing Introduction As rents and home prices have continued to rise, the ability of a low-income household to find affordable accommodations becomes significantly more difficult. To be considered affordable, the cost of housing cannot exceed 30%of household income. For example: a household earning$25,000 per year would be limited to monthly rent of$625, which is lower than the median rent of$887, and significantly lower than the market rent of$1,122 for a two-bedroom unit. Cost of Housing 2000 Census(Base 2005-2009 ACS(Most %Change Year) Recent Year) Median Home Value 138,700 374,600 170% Median Contract Rent 581 887 53% Table 30—Cost of Housing Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data 2000 Census(Base Year) 2005-2009 ACS(Most Recent Year) Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 4,261 16.6% $500-999 12,352 48.0% $1,000-1,499 5,396 21.0% $1,500-1,999 2,133 8.3% $2,000 or more 1,581 6.2% Total 25,723 100.0% Table 31-Rent Paid Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Housing Affordability %Units affordable to Households Renter Owner earning 30% HAMFI 2,140 No Data 50% HAMFI 2,925 120 80% HAMFI 9,280 660 100% HAMFI No Data 970 Total 14,345 1,750 Table 32—Housing Affordability Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 40 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Monthly Rent Monthly Rent($) Efficiency(no 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom bedroom) Fair Market Rent 719 876 1,122 1,539 1,799 High HOME Rent 780 838 1,007 1,155 1,269 Low HOME Rent 616 660 791 914 1,020 Table 33-Monthly Rent Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents Availability of Sufficient Housing The increase in the availability of affordable housing will continue to be a need that is difficult to satisfy. A strengthening real estate market puts upward pressure on rents and purchase prices and results in a widening income gap. Expected Change of Housing Affordability Likewise,the affordability may diminish as rents/purchase prices continue to escalate while incomes have minimal increases or remain static. Rent Comparison The method for determining the affordability deficit for families in need of housing is the process of comparing the amount of monthly income that is equal to 30%or less of that income with the rent costs associated with a unit that meets the family space needs. For example: a household earning $25,000 per year would be limited to monthly rent of$625, which is lower than the median rent of$887, and significantly lower than the market rent of$1,122 for a two- bedroom unit. Therefore the deficit would be $262 and $497 when compared to the median rent and market rent, respectively. Discussion Purchase price of single-family homes and condos in Miami Beach is out of reach for median earning households and the median monthly rent in Miami Beach is also out of reach for all but those households earning slightly more than the median income. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 41 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-20 Condition of Housing Introduction More than half of the housing stock was built between 1950 and 1979 which suggests that rehabilitation is necessary, even in those properties that have been generally well maintained throughout the years. This also suggests that there is a risk of lead-based paint existing in many of the properties. Definitions Substandard Unit:A housing unit that does not meet local housing building codes and/or does not meet HUD Housing Quality Standards(HQS). Substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation: A substandard unit that based on reasonable cost of rehabilitation or historical significance, should be saved and rehabilitated. Condition of Units Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number With one selected Condition 9,075 48% 13,745 53% With two selected Conditions 298 2% 1,426 6% With three selected Conditions 0 0% 40 0% With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 9,497 50% 10,512 41% Total 18,870 1000/0 25,723 100% Table 34-Condition of Units Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % 2000 or later 1,275 7% 1,439 6% 1980-1999 3,420 18% 3,263 13% 1950-1979 10,304 55% 13,523 53% Before 1950 3,871 21% 7,498 29% Total 18,870 101% 25,723 101% Table 35—Year Unit Built Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 42 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 14,175 75% 21,021 82% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 3,000 16% 1,300 Table 36—Risk of Lead-Based Paint Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS(Total Units)2005-2009 CHAS(Units with Children present) Vacant Units Suitable for Not Suitable for Total Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Vacant Units 0 0 0 Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0 REO Properties 0 0 0 Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0 Table 37-Vacant Units Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation Based on the CHAS data, approximately 50% of both owner-occupied and renter-occupied properties have identified at least one condition requiring rehabilitation. More than 50% of both the owner and renter housing stock was built between 1950 and 1979, suggesting that even properties that are generally well maintained would be in need of some form of rehabilitation. Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards Approximately 4,300 housing units have the potential of a LBP hazard. Discussion Based on the built-out condition of Miami Beach,coupled with the historic significance of many of the properties, housing rehabilitation versus new construction is a high priority. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 43 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) � % 0 > W � 0 2 3 # > 2E V) _ - ( @ @ 0m o \ _ u - to o .E � 0 +. § o ._ S 3 o = = $ 2a ) I CU o tn -C » � _ %cu k \ 0 ® E 0 > 3CL 0 ku CL\ \/ m m e = E E _ \ i . § ts % a 2 _ 22\ > E ' ° " � c § F$ 'n - g - . \ % k § \ \ © 0 L m © 0 ° eI CL 5 \/ m § O = ( \ t u = � § 0 _ { \/ / e &A / / 0 E ƒ � \ / \ I . � / 7 [ u ° E . < \ / » % 2 ° ° b"cu( 0 \ C » / o - / w \ ¥ C14 0 ° ° J / > G / % E @ = m ® = f CO = . § c u � 2 J � �A u � g f � u < $ E9 krn u o m m ° _ e ` � f § .� 2 \ m m/ °CL § c \ 3 ) � \ % o E c tto� / M 7 k \ \ o - b CL e \/ n % \ � q © 7 a % 0 = I � ^ > \ \ f / � o � u � « c f c $ m c 73 2 0 (U " k k \ E 2 \ = \ \ >/ > § 0 \ % \ K E 2 c t > f � k o o • _ > ! ƒ \ % § f \ - � » § % 2 \ } \ = 2 E u M = J - U Q \ 2 u \ U a . § < .g = 7 • c - = z \ t »In o m= / [ > a \ / J > M a 0 a • E R e « @ E u 0 + E 2 } Ln k = /3 2 3 8 2 2 \ \ 2 / - o _ , 0 _ - f Q 2 Q) 00 ± % % % ƒ 2 0 ° a 3 > u £ / / \ # # # # 2 # 7 f CU § 0 Public Housing Condition Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score Rebecca Towers South 98 Table 39-Public Housing Condition Restoration and Revitalization Needs The Housing Authority of the City of Miami Beach (HACMB) is undertaking initiatives to address energy efficiency, parking lot improvements,security surveillance enhancements, and resident activities. Strategy of Improving the living Environment of low-and moderate Income Families The HACMB's strategy is based on assessing the physical needs of its public housing development to improve the residents living environment. The HACMB has a Residents Advisory Board, and therefore residents are involved in the development of capital improvement plans. Discussion The HACMB has utilized CDBG funds to improve the condition of public housing and has a very high inspection score for it public housing units. It has focused on making physical improvements to the property and solicited resident input so that it can continue to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families that reside there. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 45 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) [ ¢ q 7 W r_ � t". o . § j 5 M a ¢ > cl, « ■ > 0 7 t 0 CL 2 0 � S. u CL ■ � / $ 2 ° c 2 C a kD CU � g 2 k m O \ 2 ad E m kf Cl F = � a J � � ƒ w o E - o o o # o \ $= / CA / / 0 2 J g 4 OD § 2 S c ° a « . m 0 IA § 3 $ 2 0 o � u 0 2 § \ a IA to -0 / E ~ o 0 0 � _ � : 7m § 2w 0 2 CL ' a: CO x 2 £ 2 IA 0 0 S I � - a f k / k 2 > b \ $ m f u k 7 A / 2 § = k J ° ° $ m - © - ^ Ln 0) O E � § 2 2 o •' @ CO m § c 15 c o c I § 3 m E EL / m� f c 0 u % \ Q- m a 2 (1) 2o L- &A ■ W \V,U 2 _■ . 5 3 2 « % m \ \ / E s � # - tn 0 j / _ < / \ � E � � G > Ln [ > 0 c m \ / U J \ 2 0 § $ _ = k E / N � � f k ) / = o ■ o . Ln w O E / / / ° k E 2 I k aj C) 0 L- E ' ■ u F- E f 3 \ f S \ o § 0 Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are use to complement services targeted to homeless persons The City of Miami Beach, Homeless Services Division provides homeless outreach, partially funded by the Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust (Trust), to those homeless in the City of Miami Beach in accordance with the Trust's Outreach, Assessment and Placement model. The model provides a standardized procedure for homeless persons to access the continuum of care and ensures they access services appropriate to their individual needs. The outreach teams also participate in the coordinated outreach process, another program funded by the Trust, which provides behavioral health outreach workers who work alongside regular outreach workers targeting chronically homeless persons. The coordinated outreach process brings together all the CoC outreach teams, including the Veterans Administration, once a month to discuss issues encountered, as well as discussing referrals to low demand, Housing First permanent housing program for the chronically homeless to be placed directly into from the street. The City's homeless outreach teams also make direct referrals to the following agencies: • Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health - provides comprehensive mental health services, including case management and transitional and permanent housing to those chronically homeless in Miami Beach. • Jewish Community Services of South Florida, Inc. - H.O.P.E. Day Laborer Program-Job/Self- Sufficiency Program - $40,000 allocation from the City of Miami Beach to help fund the job program that allows Jewish Community Services (JCS) to hire 15 homeless person(s) referred to by the City of Miami Beach Homeless Service Program to clean streets and alleys under the direct supervision of JCS assigned supervisors working with the City of Miami Beach Sanitation Supervisor(s). List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-3S Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations. • Veterinary Care Human Services—provides pro-bono veterinary services for the homeless Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 47 Rev 517 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services Introduction The City is funding the construction of a senior center in the North Beach Target Area that will provide meals and services for extremely low income elderly. The City is also funding renovations to the Jewish Community Services Senior Center located in the South Beach Target Area. The Center provides adult day to seniors. Many of the seniors suffer from Alzheimer's.The City is also funding the Boy's Club Youth Center which is also in the South Beach Target Area. Some of the youth that they serve have special needs. The City has consulted with subrecipients that provide supportive housing, supportive services and public services to persons with special needs. The City plans on funding these activities though an annual Request for Application process. Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe iv h their supportive housing g needs Supportive housing needs include case management, education, community building, advocacy, health workshops and nutrition & healthy cooking classes. Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing The Mayfair Hotel is a fully renovated, historical, Art Deco facility located in Miami Beach. The Mayfair has two programs through Douglas Gardens CMHC. One program is a 20 bed subsidy program for eligible DG consumers. The second is the 22 bed Shelter Plus Care Mayfair program. The site is in South Beach and central to cultural events and institutions such as museums, Miami City Ballet, New World Symphony, libraries, medical offices, and transportation. The Shelter Plus Care Program is a permanent housing program designed to serve homeless individuals with a severe and chronic mental illness. In addition to the housing subsidy, persons in this program are provided with supportive services such as Case Management, Medication Management, and Social Rehabilitation groups. They are also encouraged to become involved in community and peer run activities such as Journal/Writing Club, Garden Gazette, DG Walking Club, and Double Trouble. Douglas Gardens CMHC has two S+C programs: The Mayfair and Scattered Sites. The Mayfair is designed for persons in need of a more structured facility and monitoring. Scattered Sites is intended for persons able to live completely independently but still in need of psychiatric services and support. In order to be eligible for the S+C Program, persons must be homeless, have a psychiatric disability, have a stable income, and be actively involved in treatment. Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e)with Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 46 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e) The City plans to fund activities that address the housing and supportive service needs indentified in the Consolidated Plan. For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) The City plans to fund activities that address the housing and supportive service needs indentified in the Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 49 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment When compared to other parts of Miami-Dade County or even some municipalities in other counties in South Florida, Miami Beach enjoys a relatively strong real estate market.This creates and contributes to the two primary problems affecting availability of affordable housing. This is compounded by the geography which presents limited vacant land for construction of new units.The cost burden associated with homeownership opportunities (other than condominiums) makes it almost impossible for low to moderate-income households to purchase a home. Furthermore, many of the units, both rental and condominium, are one bedroom or efficiencies and cannot accommodate those households that require multiple bedrooms. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 50 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Ln 0 m u CLO c c .3 O 0 w a m = �^ U Y Q O Ly O m in _U }r L Q (U 3 N N a � r m Q 3 O p m u_ Gl 2: s Z C > a, 3 C v, Ln a) O E r`o 0 c N =p A Q Z ai a� 4 v +, O o m E @ v v Y c 7 v p E C to Ln ` `C vii E m y m _� _U C C Ou m O m a u U O Q u u \ OU C LLJ Q) a+ �, LM C U = H O Ln G N m > 4! C N -p C } U C > C O 0 u W C a1 p t m m ++ v O U w = 3 p 0 C 0 0 fl p o U a1 LL m _ C LJCJ •N ++ U to m (v O C .0 L C- N m U m U Ln O C O 3 > 4T U O C ry C V) M u v — O 3 4+ m O � ° m � O H a Q a` w v 2 Ln Ln o 'C a) V) ` QO • e • • v • • • • • • C r LA u C H H H 0 co 00 Ln O M ri 00 N -qr M M d Y O N d N a 0 o N w Ln o d m L N ri N LD LD O M M Ln r- N 00 � N ri ri ri Y O 0 V m L N M 00 Ln 00 1.* N m 1- O o0 co O O LD N 00 Ln a-I Rt N C) 00 O Ln 1l 00 M f, 00 ri LD Ln LD 41 N 00 .� Ln LD M ri M ri CF cr O r-I M d E 2 M Ol I- O m m m r-I m 1- O 0 1l Q LD Ln O LD O m O M 00 m -c*- LD Ln LD N 2 N LD 1, Ln W T N M M W O .-I O 0 U o O N ^ Rl- ri ri N I, M N N 00 41 Q a Y r-I LU m E o 3 m Z lV Q . - v V a �a N H u c .T C 41 m t0 O N ¢ Q 0 U C �+ w O C r h � O ? u m X 00 o r0 cq Y m W 6 Ln y C d ri �p d E 01 W f0 7 a` NO Ln C N ra C O •- l7 E v O1 m t o ro .i m r m 0� Ou m v 3 'd 1� 0 Q C _V C j u 'A Ln a `� > C u: C. C (6 Qj C 0 O 0 cu 0 �j, C OcI N u 0) f`0 OJ U 0-' C = C u �+ -d Ln O � �� _C 'O 00 N Ln H C m 00 LD G! f6 C C N C •L u = C 0 N 10n Q t' p C O i '� C '� "6 CL) M N f0 t y o c y ±' C 3 O Ol t0 to 'O Q ~ O H .� Z •G GJ W ate•, m C j , v u — o 0) C o C 0 ` '^ C u O r o Q M t � m o '� tin < o 'a L c g O 0- a � c W m Q Q U w ii — 0 Labor Force Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 50,594 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 48,067 Unemployment Rate 4.99 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 17.41 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 3.68 Table 43-Labor Force Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Occupations by Sector Management, business and financial 19,771 Farming,fisheries and forestry occupations 224 Service 11,349 Sales and office 12,044 Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 2,474 Production,transportation and material moving 2,205 Table 44—Occupations by Sector Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 27,022 61% 30-59 Minutes 13,567 31% 60 or More Minutes 3,660 8% Total 44,249 100% Table 45-Travel Time Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Education: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Less than high school graduate 3,473 223 1,817 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 7,788 523 2,127 Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 53 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Some college or Associate's degree 10,303 622 1,966 Bachelor's degree or higher 20,725 627 3,928 Table 46-Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Educational Attainment by Age Age 18-24 yrs 25-34 yrs 35-44 yrs 45-65 yrs 65+yrs Less than 9th grade 234 731 267 1,294 3,340 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 888 963 783 1,475 1,736 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 1,856 3,347 3,041 4,050 3,270 Some college, no degree 1,546 2,595 2,729 2,936 1,621 Associate's degree 327 1,514 1,492 1,648 550 Bachelor's degree 769 6,177 4,070 4,597 1,759 Graduate or professional degree 114 3,701 3,010 3,778 1,805 Table 47-Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Educational Attainment-Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate 16,779 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 21,254 Some college or Associate's degree 30,897 Bachelor's degree 42,621 Graduate or professional degree 64,824 Table 48-Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS Data Based on the Business Activity table above,what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? The top three businesses by sector are the following: 1. Arts, Entertainment, and Accommodations(22%) 2. Professional,Scientific and Management Services(17%) Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 54 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 3. Education and Health Care Services (16%) Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: The workforce needs of the business community are for the following occupations: • Management, business and financial; • Sales and office; • Service Drainage improvements are needed to help existing businesses and stimulate future economic development. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create Planned local public or private sector investments and initiatives that may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period include planning and construction of a new convention center. This project will need unskilled and skilled labor. Drainage improvements will create jobs and provide economic development opportunities. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? Workforce development is needed for the following employment opportunities: 1. Arts, Entertainment, and Accommodations 2. Professional,Scientific and Management Services 3. Education and Health Care Services Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan The City provides funding to a local non-profit, Unidad of Miami Beach Inc., to provide employment training for low and moderate income people. The Little Havana Activities Nutrition Center employs low and moderate income seniors at its Rainbow Childcare program. Miami Beach CDC housing rehabilitation projects provide training and employment opportunities. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 55 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? No If so,what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. Discussion The.arts, entertainment,accommodations, professional, scientific, management services, education and health care sectors are the major employers in the City.The City has a well educated workforce to meet the needs of the business community. There is a need to update the City's infrastructure, specifically its drainage to promote sustainable economic development in the City. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 56 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there any populations or households in areas or neighborhoods that are more affected by multiple housing problems? Low-income households are more affected by multiple housing problems, particularly Hispanic households. Are there areas in the Jurisdiction where these populations are concentrated? Low income families are concentrated in the North Beach and South Beach Target Areas. What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? The North Beach market generally has less new development, and although it is more affordable than some other areas, the need for affordable housing still is an unmet need based on the number of households that require it. There are fourteen low and moderate income block groups in the North Beach Target Area. There are twenty one low and moderate income block groups in the South Beach target area. Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? There is good access to transportation. There are many small, regional, national and international businesses that serve these neighborhoods. There are local CDCs that provided affordable housing and public services to low to moderate income populations. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? Strategic opportunities in these areas include: • Construction of and rehabilitation of affordable housing; • Opportunities for youth programs and the construction of a new youth center in the South Beach Target Area; • Opportunities for senior programs and the opening of a new senior center in the North Beach Target Area; • Economic development including a Facade Improvement Program in the North Beach Target Area; and • Infrastructure improvements. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 57 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Strategic Plan SP-OS Overview Strategic Plan Overview (1)The general priorities for allocating investment geographically within the jurisdiction will be in the North Beach and South Beach Target Areas.The general priorities and needs are public facilities, public services and affordable housing. (2)The rationale for establishing the allocation priorities given to each category of priority needs, particularly among extremely low income, low-income, and moderate income households is a housing market analysis, a poverty and income demographic analysis, CDAC recommendations, and consultation with City departments,subrecipients and the HACMB. (3)Obstacles to meeting underserved needs include less federal and state resources. (4) Priorities and specific objectives the jurisdiction intends to initiate and/or complete during the time period covered by the strategic plan include construction and or rehabilitation of public facilities, provision of public services and construction and or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Funds that are reasonably expected to be available to address identified needs include CDBG, HOME, SHIP, County funds, bank financing and subrecipient funds. Proposed accomplishments and outcomes are construction and or rehabilitation of public facilities, provision of public services and construction and or rehabilitation of affordable housing. To accommodate the population of the City, the City's 2025 Comprehensive Plan - Housing Element establishes a goal to have available a sufficient number of housing units in an adequate variety of types, sizes, locations, and cost ranges, within sound structures in safe neighborhoods. As such, the City has identified eight(8) primary housing-related objectives,which are: 1. Creation and/or preservation of affordable housing, 2. Elimination of substandard housing and structural and aesthetic improvements to existing housing, 3. Adequate sites and distribution of housing for very low to moderate-income households; and adequate sites for mobile and manufactured homes, 4. Adequate sites for group homes and foster care facilities, 5. Conservation, rehabilitation or demolition of housing, including identification of historically significant housing, 6. Relocation, 7. Housing implementation programs, Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 58 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 8. Energy efficiency and renewable resources To further the Housing Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Local Housing Assistance Plan was created, in compliance with the regulations and requirements of the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program. Its purpose is to meet the housing needs of very low, low, and moderate-income households; to expand the production of, and the preservation of, affordable housing. To carry out this Plan,five (5) primary assistance strategies have been established: 1. Owner-occupied housing rehabilitation 2. Disaster mitigation recovery 3. New construction 4. Down payment/closing costs and rehabilitation 5. Multi-family rental housing development The City believes that these plans(which are incorporated by reference) are consistent with,and support this Consolidated Plan, and each other. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 59 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) SP-10 Geographic Priorities Geographic Area 1 NORTH BEACH AREA Local Target area The northern boundary is 87 Street and the southern boundary is 63 Street.The area includes portions of census tracts 3901, 3905 and 3907. Specific housing characteristics include primarily older multifamily rental, condominiums and single family homes. Collins Avenue, 71 Street and Normandy Drive are the major commercial corridors. During the consultation process, business owners, local subrecipients that serve that area and CDAC identified this neighborhood as a target area. It also has high concentrations of poverty and low and moderate income block groups. 1. Youth programs 2. General public services for immigrants and low and moderate income residents 3. Senior services 4. Code enforcement 5. Economic development 6. Homeless outreach 1. Improve the housing stock 2. Provide more public services 3. Economic development 4. Improve the overall quality of life 5. Provide more services for the homeless 6. Improve public safety 2 SOUTH BEACH Local Target area The northern boundary of the South Beach Target Area is Dade Boulevard and the Southern boundary is Biscayne Bay. Census tracts in the Target Area include portions of 4201, portions of 4202, portions of Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 60 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) 4300,and portions of 4401,4402 and 4500. The South Beach Target Area contains a diverse mix of housing and commercial characteristics. The housing stock includes single family homes, public housing, condominiums, and apartment buildings. Commercial characteristics include small businesses, hotels, and the Shops at Fifth Street which includes a supermarket and several national chain stores. Consultation with the HACMB, CDAC,City Departments and subrecipients helped to identify this neighborhood as a target area. 1. Youth programs 2. General public services for immigrants and low and moderate income residents 3. Senior services 4. Economic development 5. Homeless outreach Table 49-Geographic Priority Areas General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the state The North Beach and South Beach neighborhoods have the highest concentration of low and moderate income census tracts and people in poverty. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 61 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) SP-25 Priority Needs Priority Needs Priority Need Name Priority Level Population Goals Addressing Childcare High Extremely Low Public service activities Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Youth Programs High Extremely Low Public service activities Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Senior Services High Extremely Low Public service activities Low Moderate Elderly Elderly Frail Elderly Affordable Housing High Extremely Low Multi-family Rehabilitation Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Elderly Frail Elderly Energy Efficiency High Extremely Low Public Facility or Infrastructure Low Activities Moderate Multi-family Rehabilitation Drainage High Extremely Low Public Facility or Infrastructure Improvements Low Activities Moderate Middle Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 62 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Table 50—Priority Needs Summary Narrative (Optional) The current difficulties in the housing market present a large challenge for the City. The housing market in Miami Beach, though diminished from previous high levels is still prohibitive for many households. Cost burden is the number one problem affecting housing availability. The City must balance its efforts between the production of more affordable housing without diminishing overall property values and ultimately affecting its tax revenue base. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 63 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Market Characteristics that will influence Housing Type the use of funds available for housing type Tenant Based NA Rental Assistance (TBRA) TBRA for Non- NA Homeless Special Needs New Unit There is high demand in the rental market due to an improving economy, which Production further drives up the cost burden for housing. The City of Miami Beach is largely built out so new construction opportunities are limited. The aging housing stock in the City make the rehabilitation of existing housing stock a priority. Acquisition and rehabilitation of housing is also a priority. The increasing demand for affordable housing, coupled with the increasing demand for market rate housing, places pressure on property owners to sell to purchasers that will develop more high end (through demolition/rehabilitation) rather than affordable units. This continues to put pressure on the two primary problems affecting the housing market, cost burden and overcrowding. Rehabilitation There is high demand in the rental market due to an improving economy, which further drives up the cost burden for housing. The City of Miami Beach is largely built out so new construction opportunities are limited. The aging housing stock in the City make the rehabilitation of existing housing stock a priority. Acquisition and rehabilitation of housing is also a priority. The increasing demand for affordable housing, coupled with the increasing demand for market rate housing, places pressure on property owners to sell to purchasers that will develop more high end (through demolition/rehabilitation) rather than affordable units. This continues to put pressure on the two primary problems affecting the housing market, cost burden and overcrowding. Acquisition, There is high demand in the rental market due to an improving economy, which including further drives up the cost burden for housing. The City of Miami Beach is largely preservation built out so new construction opportunities are limited. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 64 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) The aging housing stock in the City make the rehabilitation of existing housing stock a priority. Acquisition and rehabilitation of housing is also a priority. The increasing demand for affordable housing, coupled with the increasing demand for market rate housing, places pressure on property owners to sell to purchasers that will develop more high end (through demolition/rehabilitation) rather than affordable units. This continues to put pressure on the two primary problems affecting the housing market, cost burden and overcrowding. Table 51—Influence of Market Conditions Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 65 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) q 2 0 / m n k k 2 � 0 2 2 - k k � 823c _ 0 0 CL x > G I � « « C o k k 0 en g - k / $ / .. C 0 a _■ © § m .0 p o 0 ƒ > a 2 IA 0 c o_ o / CL E § B E o 0 IA � f 7 a c M Ix �Uj CL / i E m q u m -@ 2 ® ° - 7 r - ® E of a 2 0 0) I _ R In I 2 dm 2 o R . . . q $ f to 2 \ c k ƒ m - f / [ 3 2 %cu 7k % > > A § § u u 2 (A 0 / ° � / c w § : § = \ a ` 5 § m $ $ / R u 7 r / ? � § 3 g g » $ 2 2 / 2 E §E < k« 0 \ %§ k k ,0 « 0 c � _ a- a $ S Z o e a 0 \ 2 ) m \ tn 2 Ln 0 / / / k e \ § §L L L « o ° 2 ° c > ? ■ $ 0 _ v (1) \ m e 2 2 a a CL § 9 R � . c § { § 2 R m § ) Ln 2 C: ' a to 0 k c o C / u 4.0 E i ° £ C « § 0 o _ 0 u § k # ° _ 0 E a E J CL § m ■ § E k 0 2 W � 2 k ƒ ( 4� ? J 2 U \ § 2 � � R ■ x 75 m t /. 2 2 $ E E 2 2 n g k / k cu-0 u § u M ? ■ -0 § 2 3 § f � $ 0 / ■ � $ � c - > m £ OD_0 c m Q) u CL % '0 ca k u / Q \ ° U f Q) § / ■ 0 d L © o k 6 . CL L 2 > % u © / o CL 0 2 k § § ƒ 3 ■ E ( / 0 ( o � Ln IA ƒ f 2 f c _ 2 / ¥ d CL) & k m \ 41 o « CL en _ c t c° -0 4) \ 2 / o LA f G c Ln CL 0 ° 0 ° 2 ■ u 0 � � _ - > � ■ � § � § � ƒ / ƒ J § E- % � � { 2 2 2 CL 7 ° © z 4g u s (1) -0 CL c u u uj k U U- 4-- k § 0 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role Geographic Area Served Type Boys and Girls Clubs of Non-profit public services Jurisdiction Miami-Dade organizations Housing Authority of PHA Rental Jurisdiction the City of Miami Beach Jewish Community Non-profit Homelessness Jurisdiction Services of South organizations public services Florida, Inc MIAMI BEACH CDC Non-profit Rental Jurisdiction organizations UNIDAD OF MIAMI public services Jurisdiction BEACH, INC. Table 53-Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Strengths in the institutional delivery system include partnerships with an affordable housing CDC and public service providers that provide youth services, senior services and other public services to low and moderate income residents. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services Homelessness Prevention Available in the Targeted to Targeted to People Services Community Homeless Fwith HIV Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy X X Legal Assistance X X Mortgage Assistance X Rental Assistance X X Utilities Assistance X Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement X Mobile Clinics X X Other Street Outreach Services X X X Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 68 Rev S 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X Child Care X Education X X Employment and Employment Training X X Healthcare X X X HIV/AIDS X X X Life Skills X X X Mental Health Counseling X X X Transportation X X Other Table 54-Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) As a member of the Miami-Dade County Continuum of Care, the City of Miami Beach coordinates with CoC providers to meet the needs of the homeless within the community. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above The Continuum of Care service delivery system allows for a single point of entry which allows for better targeting of services and meeting client needs, better knowledge of resources available in the community, and improved referral networks through HMIS. Gaps include the City of Miami Beach not having homeless facilities within its boundaries, not having enough homeless outreach personnel to cover the entire city and the need for emergency shelters for homeless sexual offenders. Consolidated Plan MIAMI BEACH 69 Rev 5 17 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) as E � •v O a� -W 3 � •v O � � O U O) of 7a CL H j O 0 C o_ a a D O eo c =o c w LL 0 cc O V U U = W U N U N E w O 4J T C m U 41 E cu Q W N to I^ A > v C A C -O +�+ O of tw cu w CL O 3 Z W 0 U >- Ln Q 2 w m i � Q of Ln m V d E L O cu cu CL uA L- 'O 'O H V 0 Q O l70 S5 N MO W 0 u0 m u m U U L a a! � 00 m C 7 O O N M > C > _ o) U E � 7 C 7 C _p O O CL O O O- m E O of —ca)O O E > O E > O o Z V O Z V O Q M `m —1-1 .^-i -1 C y uy :I- t O O O C _m " M M M d C m m e-I r-I `i o 0 N } O O O M ++ m `� m m E N o CU O0 N a E > O 0) 3 C rL U cc N � E O Q m O _N m Z O Ln t0 E V > O rO E O m o V LL i Vf m — Z Ln _U N u m j L 0 cu u N 0 d s d d' m O m k / m k § c (U c / / � k / c ® > [ k c 2 > 0 0 E ° 2 %C ƒ E § 772 CL Qa bo � y tf u S / L § aj m m c (U CL 00 u CL E o � 0/ � v u £ 2 2 ƒ c § / 2 k 0 0 > > 3 -0 $ k i o \ m . � 0 c u c ' u = 5 @ 2 � @ tn � m Ln § ƒ $ • u f / w k 0 co u ° e g ' § :3 cL © _ g ©m § § E N E 5 k k / / u E E 2 \ m k g / f 2 2 f cu �_ & k cL E k / % 4- M CL a m 0 k c \ % 4 4A cu 0 k c 2 / 2 2 7 / u f u / / C % . _ 4A £ \ u 4A © c ■ 2 f \ £ 3 2 m m J ® � k f m § \ 2 ? \ @ £ E , / Ln ci o ° m M C § ( 2 2 0 a u c 2 k n o / _ . o ■ A § 3 § £ 2 A ° E » k « u e e o . Ln 7 m 2 # § § 6 r . ± . Q k o k - 2 k c m § 4-- o \ m: -0 I ¢ 2 E 2 $ f k 2 a § 0 - 0 « ° e c « e I u = . 2 a 2 ƒ 0 Ln tn 0� ) / K / ® — o to £ = M 0 5 ' f CL -0 co -C § § $ kn � E e k $ § LA tw ® r4 2 2 \ k a / 2 0 C k ) \ ° 0 Ln ° u ® £ > u § u c § ± 0 ° \ � � ' £ 3 k x u c E § C 2 e j E r- / / u m / t o ° a e c S \ a ° > k k Ln ƒ ° f § 2 0 2 .2 2 8 ° E CL 3 2 u m a E Cn CL A $ 0 � / 0 k 2 0 k 0 a / £ cu k I 0 0 m u c § 2 k k E LU u / 2 m ' o -T m -0 CA 2 C 0 0 E / / \ £ -0 - cu u k M 1 / f 0 I ' U a) -0 / f\ ( § E / t ° k ' ' Ln / k \ k IA 2 : -0 § c aj ° a ° c 1 r 2 # " u 2 0 # 9 aj CL . c - E 0 E cu t \ $ $ c Ln t / ° / ƒ ° k 2 � ' E : / • ƒ / m § / \ 0 k ƒ k L J / / E _ © -4'6-- ® © E a © -0 k \ 3 o o ■ � c > 2 0 7 £ a p 0 f ) 0 ° u w e k E § # E / E / . § « p f ƒ £ / A § § u o ~ U (U � / / / \ t \ m c .? CL aj � a $ u w 2 = # E E E 2 u (A 2 u 2 = f LA / E M 0 O Y c +1 u L c �C c u In a a > CL s tto ss.+ O t10 c 0 0 -a o a ca L ro a L a .� " .E 3 E p 0 E L M +; E >- E C. , +, a Y o u a to a C a mw j N a C p C a LA > a v N O a to C O ` ° y c a u L + v ° O ago c m t (U E 0 O Y W -D O c = L -p E X w OD CL c Y t m E c y o E c u ti4 v +- > :a rn H 'L In a O cv ra C O a p C C 3 O N u O vi O> C a .� `0 — 'O m 7 C {J ° ai CL v o fO v a v ° a f6 c 3 C C c ° L ° bA y C ° o ro W +, x IA :3 E O u u w >.C o ° = ao Cu C C U Y a > Y 3 L H a N `J C •> a t a c a CA I^ `^ 3 a -C .3 c C. m L — H u f0 0 O Y YO M �^ m O 4' 0! •, a u 'B u O to vai N Q L C' L X- 41 E C.LA CL C_ ,C O E I� a In c � � �_ a 'O ai fo � a >' C 7 c "° O E a ° O a U O > U C In �^ C L In O O c Q = N E Y m a OL = f° L a C. Z Gl 'O r u E � L to m > L N .E H C >•, iLn C OA N O C ,u = Y L u a - 4- to c ; a N a c = L > > c E �' c c oA 'N 3 vim, c E a .3 L *= — O p N � c o 0 c Mr N o Q a E :o. ,,, a 3 -o u_ C L p ° o u E 'Q N a "� 'N 'C .p u C -O C o >' L r'' u .3 O a C O _ C. Y C ++ C R y C N` L a 7 S L a C p u C N O a N >+ +,' UY -0 •M V) :m p a C E Q C Om u L a C U O E + C a O Y o a to Y u d0 Q E U O OC N EA O In o o " +1 C ` L L L " Y C C. m O Y +. Y C W O N N a O a L O a +, C � m a GJ =W C_c G Q a L a y p '^ 3 a on QJ L O O C O_ Y +-' c a ` to C In L O O +� c Z, .00 N 3 a a a C_ oo — C y CO a a C O ro Ou m ti4 tia C m N - '0 kn U v v o ` '� •7 a c ,In m Q u d A 0 to +, E L 00 C 70 O O v_i L p L O +, u Z C_ L a �C ++ m In O +-' of C 3 Ian M ` +L+ N t' +1 ` N O` 4J 'u u CU u U "' a s 'E a' E L f O c C a 0 L -0 0 t ,C N ro Co u E E +, ti3D "' c O a W > m v to In C oaio ON '_' O v ro a+ E ` a ,,, D ai ? 4: N L C_ N c ° > vi v a C t Y O O a m t �+ti+ a a a 7 C M u ++ Y N L GJ C E O 0 p v a O U O C y -p 3 m c CJ -0 n p d in o N N M u c a a v 3 U O p 3 N a`� +C a E rino O c O aJ to E U (k) CN d . rj Oo -0 ^-i v o u v- c 0 a O p o '�U '� p u ai o X m >_ a E to O u Q o u C > O y -o a Y Y u O a v a 3 0 u a a u c �r o •a o u N O Y �' m c 'E E o L 4— +j aEi a +' E -0 `N" O O `~ E �w v v —° ±' c Q 3 ° ` c ° ao 3 c m M o OQ ° N N3 O o0 to c a N fo 2 E U C Y Ln U C •N IA l0 L (0 v1 d0 N o O t U N 2 .0 a o ca O In .N ` OCA a N a C 2_ c d 4J t p v L �o L u O O 7 L LA 'a �= c a N a E m N P L n c E in ° 0 2 o -0 =a Q � u C u 2 o O++ � w 00 JA 47 L. O -0 — G m OA m oD � � � � W L a t Ln •E t L > •E to L Y tA w Y •� O L O IA = 'N r,� +� C — •a y �_ a eo O y c E to d E u Vf 4J j O O L vi E m a x u c i �o 0 0. a .a d n m = o '> o f 0 t c E a M o � m �, t c a, Q. c m V 0 ' En" d Ln 'O IA C. (LO N E N N •C Ln d E c O u E E O Q ao 3 •� O � c O .� = 0 0 3 G a1 a c p CJ two a *' _A ' R a O £ `� c E H a s o N c d v E t0 +A+ 3 LA a Or 'A x c '++ Z a w L O O eo A "Zn ate—+ L V L ' j 1d N V Ln CL N L O a O 7 3 :° a oA 3 Y a) C• s tA L c cm t Q = Eo � c V GJ vi kA 41 O i \ G I- O Q m O m 'O O '� 'a ++ - a m O 3 '^ da M O r " m N _ L t 0 +' 'O O •E -W b0 a m W U O u N C .a C M o c 0 CJ .� oco u N dJ c E d ' u O •L m V) a O p v �^ Y `~ C. 'a p ° _r_ .a c a = v► 'a v �+ ti4 m r 0 Z 0 c c L m y- m •� H GJ > CL c a)GJ *' a to Q ++ C = m C• U v ?' m O � ~ m a vi a a u, ea 'a O cv m co M = 3 c + c C• to °c° c 3 ai E o m In > vi c ? 'a E C 0 v ` -mo C c = m m 0 Ln a 4, 7 c .0 GJ C E m oo in w c a u o ,Z o v t O a *� •�_ E C O O +O + a = C a U U o o E O -a u a s a Q o c Y o v o Ln In a, o c g 3 O to y E a z O m c > O _ O L c c m X 0 0 c G 0 U s C. O y +L+ CL) v u C. fo H in = 2 3 0 E CA u v � � CL c c ra m y C L m m a, 3 C " Q CL o v 0 0 o a� , 0 0 u >, c a' +� Q- u ° 0 +- �, 3 c L- m `� a u .o ° c n :22 > c E ° " = 0 0 0 Ln a, ° aj c o E CL Ln aj L 0 > L w r- o a v 0 o N N > a, 0 v 4-1 0 n o c CL 75 (J in w a) L y 3 Q E N w ON E a1 N E S- L =3 D L w L _ Ln -m0 4- E 3 4- C L ` O U M p 0 O 0 m al a) O r- , u c +L' Em m ° -o m Ln m o a > to a+ 4- "0 LA O a 'C al w 12 am U m H r+-a C C y 'u H "a L C m '� -0 L a1 ON C O ° N m O t0 m p v '> in +✓ a n�i t cNO m ami E ° '� a c f0 aJ C t L -p 0 3 C2 a 3 s a o c c m Y c a W x m 3 0. m v 3 a✓ O 0 a) J V+ a E ami -° a"i Q fl. s c O >- a O 4- x t 3 0 ° O .O O � m C c U m 3 a .0 a' Q m m -0 0i f° v) OQ y v C 3 m •C C E �V c w C Q CU 'm a� m ? aj aj 3 m CQ •C x a� c •� 3 U m -O L .0 > 2 CL a fl. m m t C vii o 0 �n c u a m c a v VI to C _ a4-+ x L m t _ u E u J 3 w 4- a! v L > 0 ° N u :O (1 OD 4J 0 N m +, Ln m O � a� a) a d c c C1 m V1 U "O r1i m aL-+ � a 0 o o aJ ,n m C2 �+ - L c L L J•+ L J aj ±� a 4 c m n ° t+-0 s = m CU o v '8 -a ` E ( d 3 s L t E C > 3 o L O m N m c Ln U 'n C L a= C w d4 4 H c a1 O 4J a-+ 3 a= N c s m a+ x aJ m m C (U f0 L is O _ Cl Q U O .� CL .m vmi +m' 41 M a_ r+�o L 07 "O Cl — 'O a7 3 "O ^ m CL m U a cu 0 r- - m a, m m E - a> > ° Ln a y im W > L c -O a, c c 0 a H th L a! U o m -° c m 0 m U 14 aJ � s '�'� a m a w 3 '�-' ° a, a m aj 3:'a N - .E w m O > m aJ ,n O E o to Y r c a! Y +�+ O °C C o N ° Y a) LJ H 3 O > L u + o LA c c 3 (u 'O m v v +' m 3 m m � O L N C CO L M Q L L c Ln -0 U V .2 0 1 U 3 a✓ a) a.... CL ii V m a s a1 Y m aJ G aJ o o m N Q CC m °L' m 2 H o 4 ° 2 E at 0 C ? L a 'O >^ 'a ? U .O O V � a > pi 3 a — > FL -O C- o '3 O c C_ O L tin a co a O U 200 C C tw L � a -O to fp C H - c L O Q p in tD C_ L p p .0 C O L c M .> 7 'O •3 L a C 4- O O a = t ra > W -d .Q �0 C- a c a _ M U O M i C H V1 a Ln O ° L M F- a-; — m c p y o ai C_ — +' c E ' - a = c a co E C L 3 m L U. >— O a O Gl U O Ln > a — C a O 3 J — of O �„ a > w '� o C i O t C 4- a 4- p U O 'N O O L p 3 in a 3 L V CL � n � Ln•O a Z W d c m 3 c Q. � a C j m m a � � -a > � ,� -1 � E +1 � a t c o p w a CL 3 cu GJ j, O p M: nn U co L m Ir O a L O &- C 'O A OO O > �- }+ 'C 00 U - co a M •� � � O oto c m p c v C CL u To O : 0 " CL a a t c d0 c c c > > aNi > L .`a O L C U c CU a -0 3 � a u c > a r '^ in 'O u O a O a a � � O U o a a c Q -p f° C CU f0 m y aci r 3 d E c m a ++ a E w O p �? cr t �O o N A O m '� 0 L- Q vi E �n o `1 m H n 00 Q �° m c L c to E O a ao a v O `= a c O o ci ,n 3 0 C �^ O CJ Q aci h c C = a a a a U cc O m Ln L L U L t a a > �° ad d O o dO CD !' Ln 3 f0 E � 0 M In DJ a (7 '3 t 3 D a o a M Il o 4.0 c a — d' .. 1 d N C O CD L a C ca u +L+ 3 'C O a o dti m th uMi m z 3 +a+ > O cc > V h ra M A o U a c vJ" v a O a 0 d � L = O a m p s O C 3 G C m to 41 3 o E o x � E m n a 2 i k / _ o - ■ k � k k � S � @ 0 ' • V) k 2 k 7 c ' : / E / A k o � - k / § 0 \ AL,7 0 in - 2 - & k 2 ( C t k $ b E [ 2 _ U o E / 0 ■ § k I IA % f E co _ 0 > $ u o c a o E � to ° / E ° � 0 k \ o > . k t o m E o CL k / � m u E f k § 2 { [ CO % . § 5 W § \ m c E cr 0 -C E § U. a � 0 2 LLJ tto CU k E f ( © § ® o u 3 \ 7 u g / Ln & 2 J 2 _£ o « m & c • I m - - 2 (D E u / § \ 2 2 2 f f / > ( 2 2 E CL E \_ o m - 2 E f \ 2 0 7 u - � £ % f IL k J 0 ui 2 . f . ■ ® S f § O 2 7 § m U -6 u 7 7 E 0 C k "a M u L ( D § § / a k e 2 p 0 a 1 � f li �1 r � O —f�- o —; m0 o 0 0.5 j Eligible Block Groups (Greater Than 50 % Low Mod) M» m,o eupni.eaa wwo in Miami Beach + MD Demographic and Housing Data 2010 Census ,��City of Miami Beach, iLi Population Total Population --"' 87,779 Population by Sex/Age Male 45,969 Female 41,810 S Under 18 11,220 $ 18&over 76,559 T 20-24 5,177 25-34 17,411 i c _tIG816K_ 35-49 22,942 _ i LA 50-64 15,509 65&over 14,233 Population by Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino 46,564 Non Hispanic or Latino 41,215 Population by Race White 76,677 , African American 3,825 Asian 1,635 American Indian and Alaska Native 256 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 45 Other 3,002 N Identified by two or more 2,339 Housing Status c (in housing units unless noted) tsr ST Total 67,499 d a Occupied 47,168 z Owner-occupied 18,194 _ Population in owner-occupied 35,549 Renter-occupied 28,974 o sa Population in renter-occupied 51,204 �- Households with individuals under 18 6,492 ` -- Vacant 20,331 Vacant:for rent 4,770 Vacant:for sale 1,320 Vacant:for seasonal/recreational/occasional use 11,988 Source:U.S.Census Bureau.Census 2010,SPI,Ivtianti-Dade County,Department of Planning and Zoning, Research Section,2011. mail HEALTH DEPARTMENT MIAMI-DADS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'` ' PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS [PLWHA] THROUGH 2012 PLWHA cases are those whose current recidence is Miami-Dade regardless of where they were reported. Legend 33179 33180 33055 33056 _1 PT-' T • 33015 33169 L W� 33018 33162 33 160 1 - 5 6 33054 331 ;I 33014 33181 ,O 57 - 193 i01 331F,8 331"' 33107 4 L1 3;1012 194 - 384 33178 33013 385 - 1,005 33,50 33136 , 331 1 33010 33166 11006 - 11884 3317 31 , 140 33122 TOTAL = 2 3,2 70 3 1'.2 :13182 33172 33125 33136 NOT INCLUDED: 33126 331 OTHER ZIP CODE = 172 33194 33184 35 13130 2 39174 33144 ;1;1134 33145 312 NO ZIP CODE = 31 33175 33165 33155 HOMELESS = 69 "'^' 33'33 <314f it J 33133 3318;; 33173 33143 33156 33190, 33186 :13176 351 . N 33157 ;3187 33177 33189 33170 ;13190 t3p31 33032 33019 33030 33033 Scale:1:336,000 Map Unit:Decimal Degrees Distance Unit:Miles Classification:Natural Breaks 33034 13035 Projection:Transverse-Mercator Author:Rodolfo Boucugnani 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 Mil"