Loading...
2013-28278 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28278 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED, PURSUANT TO INVITATION TO BID NO. 176-2013TC, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6T" STREET RESTROOMS, 53RD STREET RESTROOMS, AND OCEAN RESCUE OFFICE. WHEREAS, Invitation to Bid No. 176-2013TC, for the Construction of the 6th Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms, and Ocean Rescue Office (the ITB) was issued on May 15, 2013, with an opening date of June 14, 2013; and WHEREAS, a pre-bid conference was held to provide information to prospective proposers was held on May 22, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Public Group and Bidnet issued bid notices to 59 and 214 prospective bidders respectively of which 23 and 9 accessed the advertised solicitation respectively; in addition, 152 vendors were notified via email, which resulted in the receipt of four(4) proposals; and WHEREAS, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and recommends that the Mayor and City Commission reject all bids received pursuant to the ITB. NOW, -THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby reject all proposals pursuant to Invitation to Bid No 176-2013TC, for the Construction of the 6th Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms, and Ocean Rescue Office. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1714 DAY OF ✓4 2013. ATTEST: /10 �,�;• �� , Rafael Granado, CITY CL O RK ` ' � ,� i errera ovver, MAYO :INCOPP OF;ATED T:\AGENDA\2013\July 1 AProcuremen T• yry 6-2013 - h ands"'p°Str et Restrooms-RESO 1 of 2.doc ' A i APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE POR EXECUTION City Attom Date r COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Recommendation to Reject All Bids Received, Pursuant to Invitation to Bid No. 176-2013TC, for the Construction of the 6th Street Restrooms,53rd Street Restrooms,and Ocean Rescue Office(the Project);and Approving a Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, to Approve and Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment to the Pre-Construction Services Agreement with Thornton Construction Company,Inc.for the Construction of the Project. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Ensure well maintained facilities Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan,etc.): The 2009 Customer Satisfaction Survey indicated that 79%of businesses rated recently completed capital improvement projects as"excellent'or" ood." Issue: Shall the City Commission reject all bids and approve the resolution? Item Summa /Recommendation: In November 2000, the Administration initiated an effort to replace the deteriorated facilities at various beachfront locations with new standardized facilities. As a result, new restroom facilities have been constructed at 14th, 21St, 35th, 46th and 64th Streets. New restroom facilities are also currently being finalized at 72nd Street as part of the Oceanfront Community Center Project. The restroom facilities located at 6th and 53,d Streets,the last two remaining of this effort,are outdated, have exceeded their useful life,and are not adequate to serve the large number of users. In order to achieve the goal of renovating the restroom facilities at 6th and 53rd Streets,the City Commission approved issuance of Request for Qualifications(RFQ) No. 40-10/11,for a construction manager at risk firm(CMR)to provide pre-construction services and construction phase services via a guaranteed maximum price(GMP)for this project.The RFQ resulted in a contract award to Thornton Construction to complete the project via the CMR process.The final GMP pursuant to the CMR process was presented to the City Commission on March 13, 2013,for approval.At that time, the City Commission approved a motion to evaluate the GMP submitted by Thornton Construction in the amount of$1,225,197,while proceeding with the issuance of an Invitation to Bid(ITB)for the required scope in order to determine which method was in best interest of the City. As a result of the March 13,2013 direction received from the City Commission, Invitation to Bid(ITB) 176-2013TC was issued on May 15, 2013,with an opening date of June 14,2013. The solicitation was advertised and notices were released to prospective bidders,of which 31 downloaded the solicitation.Bids were received from four(4)bidders.After review of the bids received,ABC Construction was determined to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder at a cost of $1,151,200, compared to the GMP submitted by Thornton Construction of $1,225,197. Staff analyzed the cost-benefits of each method, ITB or GMP. Under the ITB or low bid process, the contractor is incentivized to seek changes resulting in change orders and time delays, which could be conducive to an adversarial relationship between all parties. In this scenario,the City assumes all of the risk for unforeseen conditions and errors and omissions.In the case of a CMR/GMP delivery method,all of these risks are transferred to the contractor,and the potential for change orders is minimized.Given the relatively small cost differential of $73,997 between the lowest bid ($1,151,200) by ABC Construction, Inc., and the GMP ($1,225,197) provided by Thornton Construction Company,Inc.,the CMR,it is recommended that the GMP Amendment No.1 to the Agreement with Thornton Construction Company,Inc.be approved. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends to reject all bids received,pursuant to Invitation to Bid No.176-2013TC,for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms,53rd Street Restrooms, and Ocean Rescue Office;and approving a resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, to approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a GMP amendment to the pre-construction services agreement with Thornton Construction Company, Inc.,for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms in the amount of$614,322 and 53rd Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Building in the amount of$586,171;and the provision of a temporary office trailer for Ocean Rescue in the amount of$24,704,for a total GMP in the amount of$1,225,197, plus an Owner's project contingency of$61,259,for a grand total of $1,286,456;with previously appropriated funding in the amount of$535,367 from SP Post RDA CDT and Municipal Resort Tax Fund 388, $109,671 from SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund, and$641,418 from Capital Projects Not Financed By Bonds Fund 301. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 $586,171 301-2679-069357 Capital Projects Not Financed By Bonds Fund 301 OBPI 2 $513,867 388-2680-069357 SP Post RDA CDT and Municipal Resort Tax Fund 388 3 $101,764 305-2680-069357 SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund 4 $30,543 301-2679-000356 Capital Projects Not Financed By Bonds Fund 301 5 $24,704 301-2679-069357 Capital Projects Not Financed By Bonds Fund 301 6 $21,500 388-2680-000356 SP Post RDA CDT and Municipal Resort Tax Fund 388 7 1 $7,907 1 305-2680-000356 SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund Total 1 $1,286,456 Financial Impact Summary: N/A City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: David Martinez,ext.6972 Sign-Offs: De nt Dir for I A City Manp&r city er D AD M KGB JLM . AGENDA ITEM R`7 n ll MIA MEACH � DATE �� MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and M bers of t City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: July 17, 2013 AND CITY SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAY R AY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED, PURSUANT TO INVITATION TO BID NO. 176-2013TC, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6T" STREET RESTROOMS, 53RD STREET RESTROOMS, AND OCEAN RESCUE OFFICE; AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (GMP) AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THORNTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6T" STREET RESTROOMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $614,322, PLUS AN OWNER'S PROJECT CONTINGENCY OF $30,716, FOR A TOTAL OF $645,038; 53RD STREET RESTROOMS AND OCEAN RESCUE BUILDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $586,171, PLUS AN OWNER'S CONTINGENCY OF $30,543, AND THE PROVISION OF A TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILER FOR OCEAN RESCUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,704, FOR A TOTAL OF $641,418; FOR A GMP TOTAL OF $1,225,197, WITH OWNER'S CONTINGENCY OF $61,259, FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF $1,286,456; WITH PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $535,367 FROM SP POST RDA CDT AND MUNICIPAL RESORT TAX FUND 388, $109,671 FROM SB QUALITY OF LIFE RESORT TAX FUND 305, $641,418 FROM CAPITAL PROJECTS NOT FINANCED BY BONDS FUND 301. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Ensure well maintained facilities and ensure quality and timely delivery of capital projects. FUNDING 6th Street Restrooms (with Owner's contingency) $513,867 388-2680-069357 $101,764 305-2680-069357 $21,500 388-2680-000356 $7,907 305-2680-000356 $645,038 6" Street Restrooms Subtotal 53rd Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Office (with Owner's contingency) $586,171 301-2679-069357 $30,543 301-2679-000356 $24,704 301-2679-069357 $641,418 53rd Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Office Subtotal $1,286,456 Grand Total Commission Memorandum—ITB 176-2013TC—6 t Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms&Ocean Rescue Office July 17, 2013 Page 2 BACKGROUND In November 2000, the Administration initiated an effort to replace the deteriorated facilities at various beachfront locations with new standardized facilities. As a result, new restroom facilities have been constructed at 14th, 21 st, 35th, 46th, 64th Streets and new restroom facilities are currently being finalized at 72"d Street as part of the Oceanfront Community Center Project. The restroom facilities located at 6th and 53rd Streets, the last two remaining of this effort, have extended their useful life, and are not adequate to serve the large number of users. Pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 40-10/11, for a construction manager at risk firm (CMR) to provide pre-construction services and construction phase services via a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) amendment for the 6th Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Office, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2011-27762 authorizing the Administration to execute and Agreement for Pre-Construction Services with Thornton Construction Company, Inc. (Thornton). During the March 13, 2013, Commission Meeting, the City Commission approved a motion to evaluate the GMP submitted by Thornton Construction in the amount of $1,225,197, and proceed with the issuance of an Invitation to Bid (ITB) process immediately. SCOPE OF SERVICES 6th Street Restrooms: The scope of work for this section of the project consists of the demolition of the existing restrooms located in Lummus Park at 599 Ocean Drive and the construction of a new 1,758 SF facility with a total of twenty-five (25) plumbing fixtures, concrete walkways, and landscaping. The total sitework area is approximately 14,000 SF. 53rd Street Restrooms & Ocean Rescue Building: The scope of work for this section of the project consists of the demolition of the existing restroom facility and Ocean Rescue office located at 53rd Street and Collins Avenue and the construction of a new 864 SF restroom facility with a total of twenty(20) plumbing fixtures and a separate 546 SF building facility for the Ocean Rescue Department, which includes two bathrooms with a total of six (6) plumbing fixtures. The scope of work also includes concrete walkways connecting the parking lot to the entrances of the buildings, as well as, to the beach, existing playground and outdoor fitness circuit, as well as landscape. The total sitework area is approximately 8,700 SF. Furthermore, since the Ocean Rescue Department currently occupies a room inside the existing facility, included in the scope of work is the provision of a temporary office trailer that will house the department during the construction period. ITB PROCESS ITB 176-2013TC was issued on May 15, 2013, with an opening date of June 14, 2013. The pre- bid conference was held on May 22, 2013. During the pre-bid conference, prospective bidders were instructed on the procurement process and the information their respective proposals should contain. The Public Group and Bidnet issued bid notices to 59 and 214 prospective bidders respectively of which 23 and 9 accessed the advertised solicitation respectively. In addition, 152 vendors were notified via email, which resulted in the receipt of the following four(4) proposals: ABC Contructio'n, Inc. Carivon Construction Company Team Contracting, Inc. West Construction, Inc. Commission Memorandum—ITB 176-2013TC—6th Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms&Ocean Rescue Office July 17, 2013 Page 3 The following table provides the proposed total base bid prices of the four(4) responsive bids: ABC Contruction, Inc. $1,151,200.00 West Construction, Inc. $1,312,092.32 Team Contracting, Inc. $1,317,800.00 Carivon Construction Company $1,422,263.00 CITY MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE Under a conventional design-bid-build procurement process, the contractor is incentivized to seek changes resulting in change orders and time delays, which is conducive to an adversarial relationship between all parties. In this scenario, the City assumes all of the risk for unforeseen conditions and errors and omissions. In the case of a CMR delivery method, all of these risks are transferred to the contractor, and the potential for change orders is minimized. Given the relatively small cost differential of $73,997 between the lowest bid ($1,151,200) by ABC Construction, Inc., and the GMP ($1,225,197) provided by Thornton, the CMR, it is recommended that the GMP Amendment No.1 to the Agreement with Thornton Construction Company, Inc. be approved. Refer to Attachment A for the March 13, 2013 Commission Memorandum, which provides an analysis supporting the construction cost of the project, and recommends approval of the GMP Amendment No.1 with Thornton Construction Company. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends to reject all bids received, pursuant to Invitation to Bid No. 176- 2013TC, for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms, 53rd Street Restrooms, and Ocean Rescue Office; and approving a resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, to approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a GMP amendment to the pre-construction services agreement with Thornton Construction Company, Inc., for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms in the amount of$614,322, plus an owner's project contingency of $30,716, for a total of $645,038; 53RD Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Building in the amount of $586,171, plus an owner's contingency of $30,543, and the provision of a temporary office trailer for Ocean Rescue in the amount of $24,704, for a total of $641,418; for a GMP total of $1,225,197, with owner's contingency of $61,259, for a grand total of $1,286,456; with previously appropriated funding in the amount of $535,367 from SP Post RDA CDT and Municipal Resort Tax Fund 388, $109,671 from SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund 305, $641,418 from Capital Projects Not Financed By Bonds Fund 301. Attachments: Attachment A: March 13, 2013 Commission Memorandum JLM/MT/KGB/DM/AD TAAGENDA\2013\Ju1y 17\Procurement\ITB 176-2013TC-6`h and 53rd Street Restrooms-MEMO-7.9.13.docx ATTACHMENT A MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachFl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Kathie G. Brooks, Interim City Manager DATE: March 13, 2013 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (GMP) AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THORNTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6TH STREET RESTROOMS IN THE AMOUNT OF$614,322; 53RD STREET RESTROOMS AND OCEAN RESCUE BUILDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $586,171; AND THE PROVISION OF A TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILER FOR OCEAN RESCUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,704, FOR A SUBTOTAL PROJECT COST IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,225,197, PLUS AN OWNER'S PROJECT CONTINGENCY OF $110,268, FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF $1,335,465; WITH PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $568,439 FROM SP POST RDA CDT AND MUNICIPAL RESORT TAX FUND 388, $101,172 FROM SB QUALITY OF LIFE RESORT TAX FUND 305, $665,854 FROM CAPITAL PROJECTS NOT FINANCED BY BONDS FUND 301. ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME Ensure a quality, well constructed capital project; ensure well maintained facilities; ensure safety and appearance of building structures and sites; ensure quality and timely delivery of capital projects. FUNDING Funding in the total amount of$1,335,465, has been previously appropriated as follows: 6�Street Restrooms with owner's continye � _ SP Post RDA CDT and Mun. Resort Tax Fund 388 $568,439 SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund 305 _ $669,611 i w53rdStreet RestrooQns & Ocean Rescue Building (with owner's contingent _ _ Capital Projects not Financed by Bonds Fund 301 $665 854 BACKGROUND In November 2000, the Administration initiated an effort to replace the deteriorated facilities at various beachfront locations with new standardized facilities. Over the last few years, new restroom facilities have been constructed at 14th, 21 st, 35th, 46th and 64th Streets. New restroom facilities are also currently being finalized at 72nd Street as part of the Oceanfront Community Center Project. The restroom facilities located at 6th and 53rd Streets, the last two remaining of this effort, are outdated, have extended their useful life, and not adequate to serve the large number of users. 368 Commission Memorandum-6th and 53rd Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2013 Page 2 of 8 The scope of work for both facilities is as follows: 6th Street Restrooms: The scope of work for this project consists of the demolition of the existing restrooms located at Lummus Park at 599 Ocean Drive, and the construction of a new 1,758 SF facility with a total of twenty-five (25) plumbing fixtures, concrete walkways, and landscape. The total sitework area is approximately 14,000SF. 53rd Street Restrooms& Ocean Rescue Building: The scope of work for this project consists of the demolition of the existing restroom facility and Ocean Rescue office, located at 53rd Street and Collins Avenue, and construction of a new 864 SF restroom facility with a total of twenty(20) plumbing fixtures, and a separate 546 SF building facility for Ocean Rescue Dept., which includes two bathrooms with a total of six (6) plumbing fixtures. The scope of work also includes concrete walkways connecting the parking lot to the entrances of the buildings, as well as to the beach, existing playground and outdoor fitness circuit, as well as landscape. The total sitework area is approximately 8,700SF. Furthermore, since Ocean Rescue Dept. currently occupies a room inside the existing facility, included in the scope of work is the provision of a temporary office trailer that will house the department during the construction period. COST ANALYSIS The construction cost for each facility, as submitted by Thornton, is broken down by individual buildings and sitework, and on a cost per SF basis as follows: LOCATION SF Total Cost Cost1SF 6th Street Restrooms Facility 1,758 $ 471,661 $268.29 Sitework 13,986 $ 142,661 $ 10.20 Total Cost for 6th Street Location $ 614,322 53rd Street Restrooms Facility 864 $ 259,016 $299.79 Ocean Rescue Facility 546 $ 174,421 $319.45 Sitework 8,630 $ 152,733 $ 17.70 Subtotal $ 586,170 Temporary Trailer for Ocean Rescue $ 24,704 Total Cost for 53rd Street Location $ 610,874 Total GRIP $'1,225,196 Owner's Contingency $ 110,268 Total Project Cost $ 1,335,464 According RS Means Construction Data, the national construction cost/SF range for a standard commercial building is $125-$163/SF. The average cost/SF for Miami Beach is approximately $133/SF (refer to Attachment A). However, the bathroom component within a building is 369 Commission Memorandum-6«and 5e Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2013 Page 3 of 8 typically the most expensive component, due to the high concentration of building systems (mechanical/electrical/plumbing) in a small space. In the case of a restroom building, the higher cost per square foot of the restroom component is not offset by lower cost spaces (living/bedroom/office) as it would otherwise be in a residential/commercial space, therefore the average square footage is respectively higher. See below for a diagram showing the high concentration of plumbing fixtures at 6th Street Restrooms (25 total) versus a typical 3bed/2bath home (7 total): € K� ,_.. rE�...:�°. -t..:..e»«.;,q"�1•isa�.-.'„„„„,.-#..4d 7: 'f114t'xa�t 4 7Z 2b 79 ! z i,a L Te-L ^i .';i i? _ _ • �+ 11 4. d w j A hCc rati�ieri�:`�Ys`� y!._. e't_.3�1 ..? � ..,+w, tSZ..r• Furthermore, due to the lack of mass-production (economy of scale), the cost per SF for a restroom facility varies greatly depending on building square footage. As demonstrated in the graph below,the average cost/sf of various restroom facilities built since 2006 range between $268 and $385. The trend below illustrates that the higher the total square footage the lower the cost per square foot: € 450 i 400 ------- LL 385 350 - - 9 _. � I CL N 21 1 v 300 - - -_ $29.7 i j 250 200 € 675 750 1,400 1,680 7 Facility Size (SF) 370 Commission Memorandum-6M and 5P Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2013 Page 4 of 8 Graph Data F aSt Yea . catio cit ty, t SF 675 $385 2006 64th Street Restroom Facility(Miami Beach) 750 $339 2011 Restroom Facility (Virginia Beach) 1,400 $321 2007 Temple Betham Restroom(Kendall FL) 1,680 $297 2008 Harris Field Restroom Facility(Homestead, FI.) The following table provides a breakdown of the incremental cost/sf for 53rd Street Restrooms, as an example, starting from an initial benchmark cost/sf of $134 for a standard commercial (refer to Attachment B for cost/sf comparison between a sample standard project in Doral, FL, provided by Atkins, and 53rd Street Restrooms). COPE OF.WORK COST`/SF- 1. Construction cost of a standard structure(l) $134 2. Added cost for project specific items: a) Demolition/Asbestos Abatement/Lead Removal�1} $17 b) Concrete&Masonry/Roofing./Doors&Windows/Woods& Plastics c). Finishes/Specialties/Mechanical /Plumbing/Electrical( $88 Sub Total for item 2: $173 307 .... . . ... .... ., Total�'. �:. :. Footnotes: (1) Includes General Conditions, Overhead&Profit,Bond&Insurance As clearly indicated above, the cost/sf associated with better finishes and the v-shaped & curved roofs are negligible when compared to the added cost/sf for the fact that these are mainly restroom facilities which have a high concentration of building systems. SITEWORK ANALYSIS 53(tD ST- : 53RD ST OR 53RD ST- Reit -STH S T SCOP �OFW, 011... TOTAL" Import/grading of new soil $8,198 $2,450 $2,450 $4,900 New water&sewer to building 1 $12,951 $9,669 $9,669 $19,338 New electrical service 2 $2,522 $5,515 $5,515 $11,030 Site lighting n/a $1,083 $1,083 $2,166 New phone/data service 3 n/a $ - $8,670 $8,670 . .... ...... ... Landscape Tree relocation $1,441 $220 $220 $440 New trees $7,915 $2,151 $2,151 $4,302 Shrubs/ground cover $101341 $2,392 $2,392 $4,784 Mulch 1 $2,016 1 $945 $945 1 $1,890 371 Commission Memorandum—6`h and 53rd Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2013 Page 5 of 8 SITEWORK ANALYSIS CONTINUED Sod/seeding(including topsoil) $3,163 $342 $342 $684 Irrigation system (including $10,711 $1,719 $1,719 $3,438 controller/lines/vaccum breaker) Concrete walkways/plaza $21,115 $12,762 $12,762 $25,524 Miscellaneous sitework S $8,759 $6,077 $6,076 $12,153 Site furnishings(bicycle racks) $841 $841 $0 $841 Gen.Conditions 6 $24,979 $14,688 $9,282 $23,970 Gen. Requirements 7 $15,035 $9,213 $5,822 $15,035 Overhead&Profit/Bond& Insurance $12,674 $8,314 $5,254 $13,569 T©tal slfev�rc rk ei>Est; :$Y42,6ol $78381: $7iis352 . $3.52,733 Total project site area 13,986 8,630 + ast/sF $ 0.20 $i7.10 Footnotes for table above: 1.Requested by PWD during plan reviews;existing lines not adequate 2.Existing service is not adequate to support the new electrical loads of new facilities 3.For Ocean Rescue Building only 4. This number represents the total cost for the hardscope component of the project. The ADA code requires a solid surface&accessible path to the entrances of the facilities,as well as to the adjacent sidewalks&walkways (per Chapter 11,Section 206 of the 2010 Florida Building Code). 5.Includes erosion control,surveyor layout and asbuilt,permit fees,sidewalk/curb&gutter demolition 6.Includes Project staff(contractors superintendent,project manager and project coordinator),equipment& supplies,and direct costs for transportation/parking expenses(no on-site parking available) In order to obtain further assurance that the best value for this project had been negotiated, the City contracted Atkins of North America (Atkins)to perform an independent estimate of probable construction costs (included as Attachment C). Atkins' estimated construction cost for the 6 t Street Restrooms was $625,523, and $605,569 for 53rd Street Restrooms & Ocean Rescue Office, for a total of $1,231,092 for both projects, which is approximately $30,600 higher than the Thornton's GMP (excluding the cost associated with the Ocean Rescue trailer and the owner's contingency). GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE On July 13, 2011, the City Commission approved the issuance of an RFQ for a Construction Manager at Risk Firm to Provide Pre-Construction Services and Construction Phase Services via a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment for the 6th Street and 53rd Street Restroom/Ocean Rescue Building Projects. RFQ No. 40-10/11 was issued on July 18th, 2011. 372 Commission Memorandum-6th and 53rd Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2093 Page 6 of 8 On October 19th, 2011, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2011-27762 accepting the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 40-10111, for a Construction Manager at Risk firm to provide pre-construction services and construction phase services via a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) amendment for the 6th and 53rd Street Restrooms Project; and authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Thornton Construction Company, Inc. (Thornton); and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement for Pre-Construction Services. The Agreement for Pre-Construction Services was executed on January 13th, 2012, in the amount of $23,000. As part of the Pre-Construction Services, Thornton evaluated the project documents for inconsistencies, errors & omissions between the various design disciplines, and constructability of the project, and revisions to the documents were made accordingly. On April 9, 2012, Thornton held a bid opening which was attended by representatives of the City and the Architect of Record - Corzo Castello Carballo Thompson Salman (C3TS). On April 28, 2012, Thornton submitted the first draft of the GMP proposal for review by the City and C3TS. Following negotiations, a total reduction of approximately $50,000 was negotiated in order to reach the final GMP in the amount of$1,225,196. It is important to note that Thornton obtained over ninety (90) competitive bids from local sub- contractors in order to reach the best possible GMP. The project cost breakdown per discipline for each of the projects are included as Attachments D & E. RECOMMENDATION:. On January 16, 2013, the City Commission expressed concerns regarding the project cost and referred the item for further discussion to the Land Use and Development Committee. The Project was presented in great detail by the Project Team to the Committee on January 23, 2013, and although a formal recommendation was.not made, the Committee expressed a comfort level with the methodology applied for the derivation of the numbers following the detailed presentations provided by the Architect (C3TS), Contractor (Thornton) and Cost Estimate Consultant (Atkins). The motion was made to refer the item to the full Commission without recommendation. The information presented to the Committee is included as Attachment F. The Administration is of the opinion that the final GMP is competitive, fair and a reasonable price for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms and 53rd Street Restrooms & Ocean Rescue Facility Projects, and falls well within competitive prices of today's markets given the lack of economies of scale, site logistics and amenities added for better maintenance and durability. If desired, while not recommended due to maintenance requirements, the Commission may consider the following options in order to reduce the total cost of the project: 373 Commission Memorandum—6`h and 53rd Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13, 2013 Page 7 of 8 Items that may be removed for cost reduction but are not recommended due to.. _.. maintenance 53rd St TOTAL requirements 6th"St 53rd St OR COST--_ NOTES Requires more Sealed concrete in lieu of maintenance, less epoxy flooring $10,694 $5,578 N/A $16,272 durable Eliminate wall tile 17,978 $5,621 $3,745 $27,344 Lower quality toilet Not scratch or graffitti partitions $3,294 $2,328 N/A $5,622 resistant Subtotal,i $31,966 1: $130527,: $49,238 In addition to the above, the Commission may consider the items listed below, which will require a new HPB approval, and presentation to the Board, as well as permit revisions: ITEMS"THAT WILL"REQUIRE:NEW HP8 6th St 53rd St 53rd St OR TOTAL COST APPROVAL Painted stucco in lieu of limestone cladding $20,526 N/A N/A $20,526 Elimination of landscape/irrigation $35,587 $7,768 $7,768 $51,123 Elimination of Concrete Plaza 11)IZ� $0 $1,914 $1,914 $3,828 Sub.total2 $56,113 $9,682 $9,682 $75,477 Footnotes: 1. In order to maintain the minimum level of accessible paths to the entrances of the facilities as well as to the adjacent existing walkways,as required by the Florida Accessibility Code,only approximately 15%of the total hardscape area can be eliminated at 53rd Street. At 6th Street, there are only walkways leading up to,and around the building. 2. Even though the elimination of the concrete plaza is a viable option, when taking into consideration the additional costs incurred for redesign, and additional time for due diligence to resubmit to HPB, the elimination of the plaza represents an insignificant impact to the overall project cost. It is important to note that these facilities serve prominent public beaches and recreation areas that are an integral part of the City's tourism attractions. Both are also located in highly prominent oceanfront historic districts. The 6th Street restroom is located in Lummus Park, in the City's pre-eminent Ocean Drive/Collins Avenue Historic District, and the 53rd Street facility is located in the most recently designated Morris Lapidus / Mid 20th Century Historic District. Consequently, the Historic Preservation Board requires a higher standard of design and finishes that are appropriate for these prominent oceanfront historic locations. The architect worked closely with the Planning Department staff and the Historic Preservation Board in order to reach an appropriate and acceptable tourism design standard that is also compatible with the character of the historic districts, while maintaining the functional standards of previously approved prototype designs for other beachfront restroom locations. The HPB Final Orders are included as Attachment G. Upon City Commission's approval of the GMP, and as contemplated in any GMP Amendment(s), Thornton will deliver all of the Construction Services required to complete the 374 Commission Memorandum—61h and 53rd Street Restrooms/Ocean Rescue Facility-GMP March 13,2013 Page 8 of 8 work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents, and has committed to deliver the Project to the City at or below the GMP and within the Contract time. The anticipated Project Schedule for the construction of the 61h and 53rd Street Restrooms Project is as follows: • Commission GMP Awarded: March 13, 2013 • Notice to Proceed Number One: May 2013 • Notice to Proceed Number Two: June 2013 • Construction Start: June 2013 • Construction Completion: December 2013 CONCLUSION The Administration recommends approval of the attached Resolution, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment No.1 to the Pre- Construction Services Agreement with Thornton Construction Company, Inc., for the construction of the 6th Street Restrooms in the amount of $614,322; 53rd Street Restrooms and Ocean Rescue Building in the amount of $586,171, plus an allowance for the provision of a temporary office trailer for Ocean Rescue in the amount of $24,704, for a sub-total of $1,225,197, plus an owner's contingency in the amount of $110,268, for a grand total of $1,335,465; with previously appropriated funding in the amount of $568,439 from SP Post RDA CDT and Municipal Resort Tax Fund 388, $101,172 from SB Quality of Life Resort Tax Fund 305, and $665,854 from Capital Projects not Financed by Bonds Fund 301. KGB\JGG\FV\DM Attachments, A- Average construction costs per square foot(source:RS Means)adjusted for local factor B- Cost/sf comparison of standard commercial building versus 53rd Street Restrooms ! Standard commercial building example provided.by Atkins of North America. C Atkins'independent:Cost.Estimate ur nmary.&Independent Cost Estimate Methodology D 5.'.'s traQt Restrooms Thomton`s Project Breakdown E 53`d Street Restrooms anti.Ocean Rescue Office Thornton's Project Breakdown F- Land Use and Development Committee presentation material G- HPB Final Orders H- 61h Street Restrooms—Site Plan&Elevations 1- 53`d Street Restrooms&Ocean Rescue Office-Site Plan&Elevations T:\AGENDA\2013\March 13\6th St Rest&53rd Rest and OR office\6th and 53rd St Restrooms-Thornton-GMP Amendment 1 - MEMO - Rev9.docx 375 ATTACHMENT A Atkins North America,Inc. ATKINS 2001 Northwest 107th Avenue Miami,Florida 33172-2507 Telephone:+1.305.592.7275 www.atkinsglobal.com/northamerica MEMORANDUM To: RAs.Thais Vieira, RA From: Juan Alfonso, Associate Vice President Date: February 27, 2013 Reference: Square foot cost analysis for a standard facility(Low Rise ®ice/Primary School Facility) in Miami Beach, Florida. Dear Thais: A reasonable range of square foot costs for a standard facility, categorized as an office space or primary educational space, could be between $125 -$163/SF. Atkins' assessment is documented as follows: Range of square foot costs based on RS Means Facilities Construction, national data (Publication year: 2012—27h Edition): o $125 - $163/SF (Refer to Attachment). o National Average Square Foot Cost of referenced facilities: $144/SF Local factor analysis — City cost index based on RS Means Facilities Construction (Publication year: 2012—27th Edition)— Miami, Florida index: o Material Index: 99.6% o Installation Index: 76.7% o Miami Fl. -Total city cost index: 89.6% o Miami Beach Index (Coastal Construction factor—2-3%): 92.6% - Square foot cost adjustment based on national average and adjusted index: Formula: Index for City x National Average Cost = Local Cost 100 therefore, 92.6% x $144/SF = $133.34/SF (stand. facility in Miami Beach Fl.) 100.00 ' Thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Miami Beach with our services Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments at(305) 514-3211. ** END OF MEMORANDUM 376 f�. ` .. ... k :-.�.a..:-:;aye:.-a...��..-rks.....,........-_:•..., ..:....�,...- ...-.... ._...... .. .,_ ,._ ...: ... ._...,. ..- �... { 50 1 T 00 1 S.F. Costs tsar caws of mraL _ UW 1,L4 ti EM 38 1/4 MEOIAFI 314 52 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical S.F. 56 103 122 27.50% 30% 347 52 53 0010 LIBRARIES &F. 132 168 218 53 0020 . Total project costs C.F. 8.95 1 1.20 14.30 05M Masonry S.F. 10.45 18.05 30.50 5.80% 7.60% -t 1.60X 1800 Equipment 1.78 4..8C 7.25 .34% 1.50`x, 4.07% 2720 = Plumbing _ r 4.82 6,85 9.50 3.38% 4.60% 5.70% 2770 ? Heating,ventilaWg,air conditioning 10.65 1 18.05 22 7.80% 10.95% 12.80% 2900 ' r'ewcal 13.40 17.35 22.50 8.35% 10.30% 11.95% 310 Tolal:Meftrical&C'ect6CL1 39.50 51.50 62 20.50% 23% 26.50% 54 0010 LIVING,ASSISTED S.F. 121 142 168 54 0020 Total project costs C.F. 1 10.15 11.95 13.50 0500 Masonry S.F. 3.50 4.23 5.20 2.36% 3.16% 3.911% 1800 Equipment 1 2.68 3.13 4,09 2.06% 2.45% 2.87% 2720 Plurnb>ing 10.10 13.55 14.05 6.05% 8.15% 10.60% 2770 Heating,ventilating,arc conditoning 12 12.55 13.75 7.95% 9.35% 9.70% 2900 Etectrkal 11.80 13.05 15 8.95% 9.95% 10.65% 3100 Total:MecWcal&Uectrical 33 38.50 44.50 2596 28.5046 31.50% S5 0010 MEDICAL CLINICS S.F. 123 151 192 55 0020 Total project costs C.F 9 11.65 15.50 1800 Equipment S,F. 3.32 7 10.85 1.05% 2.94% 6.35% 2720 Plumbing 8.15 11.50 15.40 6.15% 8.40% 10.10% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 9.75 12.75 18.75 6.65% 8.85% 11.35% 2900 Electrical 10.55 15 19.60 _8.10% 10% 12.25% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 33.50 46 63 22.50% 27% 33.50% 3500 See also division 11700(MF2004 11 71 00) 51 0010 MEDICAL OFFICES S.F. 115 143 175 57 0020 Total project costs C.F. 8.60 11.70 15.80 1800 Equipment S.F. 3.81 7.55 10.70 .68% 4,97% 7.05% 2720 Plumbing 1 6.40 9.85 13.25 5.60% 6.80% 8.50% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 7.70 11.15 14.70 6.10% 8% 9.70% 2900 Electrical 9.25 13.45 18.80 7.60% 9.80% 11.44% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 25 36 52 19.35% 23% 28.5095 59 0010 MOTELS &F 73 106 138 59 0020 Total project costs C.F 6.50 8.70 14.20 2720 Plumbing S,F 7.40 9,40 11.25 9.45% 10.60% 12.55% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 4.50 630 12.05 5.60% 5.60`6 10% 2900 Electrical 6.90 8.70 10.85 7.45% 9.05% 10.45% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 22 29.50 50.50 18,50% 24% 23.50% 5000. 9000 Per rental unit,total cost Unit 37,100 70,500 76,500 9500 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 7.225 10,900 12,700 60 0010 NURSING HOMES S F. 114 147 18t 60 0020 Total project costs C.F. 9 11.25 1 15.35 1800 Equipment S.F. 160 4.77 7.95 2.02% 3.62% 4.99% 2720 Plumbing 9.80 14.85 17.90 8.75% 10.10% 12.70% 2770 = Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 10.30 15.65 21 9.70% 11.45% 11.80% 2900 Electrical 11.35 14.15 19.25 9.40% 10,55% 12.45% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 27 38 63.50 26% 29.50% 30.50% 9000 Bed 50,500 6. 2 61 001 OFFICES Low Rise(1 to 4 story S.F. 96.50 125 1 61, 61 0020 --''-T pr;e:cos s1�'"� C.F. 6.85 9M 12.50 0100 Site work S.F. 7.75 13.70 20 6.20% 9.70%1 13.55% 0500 Masonry 3.84 7.65 13.80 2.62% 5.45%1 8,5036 1800 Equipment 102 ! 2.01 5,45 .60% 1.50% 3.50% 2720 Plumbing 3.44 530 7.80 3.66% 4.50% 6:10% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 7.60 10.60 15.55 7.20% 10.30% 11.70% 2900 Electrical 7.90 1 11.25 1 16.05 1.45% 9.6596 1 11.40% 1456 377 4� f 50 17 00 � S.F. Costs WT COSTS %OF TOTAL t1 1 4 i 3 4 _j L4 MEDIAN id, 74 0010 SCHOOLS Elementary- S_F 106 t. 132 l X16' 74 0020 -^ro5i �costs C.F. 6.90 ��5�'',"j 11 � 0506 Masonry S.F. 9.20 16.15 24 5.25" 10.6596 14.05% 1800 Eq*ment 2.89 4.88 9 1.83.% 3.13% 4.61% 2720 Plumbing I 6.10 8.60 11.:,0 5 70% 7.15%I 9.35% 2730 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 9.10 14.50 20.50 8.15% 10.80%11 14.90% 2900 Electrical 10 13.25 16.90 8.45% 10.05%' 11.8035 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 36.50 4450 1 55 25% 27.50% 3056 9000 Per pupil,total cost Ea. 12,100 18,000 40,400 9500 Total:Mecharical&Electkat 3.425 4,325 10.900 76 0010 SCHOOLS Junior High&Middle S.F. 109 134 163 76 0020 Total project costs CF 6.90 8.95 10.05 0500 Masonry S.F. 13.60 17.80 21.50 8% 11.60% 14.35% 1800 Equipment 3.48 5.60 8.25 1.80% 3.09% 4.86% 2720 Plumbing 6.35 780 9.70 5.30% 6.80% 7.25% 2770 Healing,ventilating,air conditioning 12.70 15.45 27 8.90% 11.55% 14.20% 2900 Electrical 10.70 12.90 16.60 7.90% 9.35% 10.60% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 35 44.50 55.50 23.50% 26.50% 29.50% 9000 Per pupil,total cost Ea. 13,800 18,100 _ 24,400 78 0010 SCHOOLS Senior High S.F 113 139 174 7$ 0020 Total project costs C.F. 6.85 9.85 16.25 1800 Equipment S.F 2.98 7 9.75 1.88% 2.91% 4.56% 2720 Plumbing 1 6.35 9.55 1745 5.60% 6.90% 8.30% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 13 14.85 22.50 8.95% 11.60% 15% 2900 Electrical 11.45 14.85 22.50 8.65% 10.20% 12.25% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 37.50 44 74 23.50% 26.50% 28.5G%. 9000 Peru 1.total cost Ea. 10.700 21.704 27,200 80 CO10 SCHOOLS Vocational S,F 92 133 165 80 0020 Total project costs C.F. 5.70 8.20 11.35 0500 Masonry S.F 5.40 1130 20.50 3.20% 4.61% 10.95% 1800 Equipment ( 2,87 7.15 9.85 1.246 3.10% 4.26% 2720 Plumbing 5.85 8.75 12.85 5x40%, 6.90% 8.55% 2110 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 8.20 15.30 25.50 8.60% 11.90% 14.65 2900 Electrical 9.55 13.05 17.85 8.45% 11% 13.20% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 36 36.50 63 27.50% 29.50% 31% 9000 Per pupil,total cost Ea. 12,800 34,200 51,000 83 0010 SPORTS ARENAS S.F. 80 107 165 83 0020 Total project costs C,F 1 4.35 7.80 10.05 2120 Plumbing S.F. 4.65 7.05 14.90 4,35% 6.35% 940% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 10 11.85 16.45 8.80% 10.20% 13.55% 2900 Electrical 8.35 11.35 14.65 8.60% 9,90% 12.2596 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 21 37 49.50 21.50% 25% 27.50% 85 0010 SUPERMARKETS S.F. 74 85.50 101 85 0020 Total proect costs C.F. 4.13 4.99 7.55 2720 Plumbing S.F 414 5.20 6.05 5.40% 6% 7.45% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 6.10 8.10 9.85 8.60% 8.65% 9.60% 2900 Electrical 9.30 10.60 12.60 10.40% 12.45% 13.60% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 23.50 2150 34 23.50% 21.50% 28.50% 86 0010 SWIMMING POOLS S.F. 120 201 430 86 6020 Total project costs CY. 9.60 12 13.10 2720 Plumbing S.F. ....p 11.10 12.70 17 4.80% 9.10% 20.5016 2900 Electrical 9 14.60 21.50 5.75% 6.95% 7.60% 3100 Total:Mechanical&Electrical 22 56 76.50 11.15`,6 14,10% 23.5024 87 0010 TELEPHONE EXCHANGES S.F. 159 227 296 87 0020 Total project costs C.F. 9.90 15.90 22 2720 Plumbing S.F. 6,10 10.40 15.20 4.52", 5.80% 6.90% 2770 Heating,ventilating,air conditioning 15.60 31.50 39 11.809; 16.0555 18.40, 1458 378 STANDARD COMMERCIAL BUILDING VERSUS RD 53 STREET RESTROOMS& OCEAN RESCUE FACILITIES Note:The"standard commercial building"used in this example is a 67,000 Charter School, built in Dora[, FL. Information provided by cost estimator consultant-Atkins of North America. R, Eli Demolition/Asbestos Abatement/ Lead removal N/A 13 13 See 1 below Concrete& Masonry(incl.sitework within building 26 58 34 See 2 below limits) Metals 4 0 -4 Wood&Plastics 4 7 3 Thermal& Moisture Protection 5 12 7 Doors&Windows 9 17 9 See 3 below Finishes 21 41 28 See 4 below Specialties 1 10 11 See 5 below Furnishings 1 0 -1 Conveying Systems 1 0 -1 Mechanical/Plumbing 23 34 11 See 6 below Electrical 19 36 18 See 7 below Mark-ups(General Conditions,overhead &profit, 22 68 46 See 8 below bond &insurance) ,n .R.aa,:.f.. ��� rte. -� ,_ „, 1. Demolition/Asbestos Abatement it Lead Removal: costs associated with these items are typically outside of the basic cost of construction included in the $125-$163 range for a house or simple commercial building. 2. Concrete it Masonry: These buildings have a high cost of concrete and concrete masonry unit (CMU) to area ratio. Due to the relative small size of these buildings, and the fact that the interior partitions are made of CMU as opposed to light gauge metal framing/drywall, the cost of CMU on a per square foot basis is much higher than it would otherwise be on a house or a commercial building, where the interior walls would be made of light gauge metal framing/drywall. Furthermore, both structures have a concrete roof, which is recommended for this type of facility in a coastal environment. The example provided above has a wood-framed roof. 3. Doors & Windows: High concentration of fenestrations per square foot area: 53rd Street has a total of 4 impact resistant exterior doors, 7 interior doors, 12 round ventilation louvers and 8 round windows (31 units total). The house depicted in the diagram on page 4 for example, has 2 exterior doors, 8 windows, and 11 interior doors (21 units total). 379 4. Finishes: - High concentration of tile, which is not offset by living spaces (since it includes walls, whereas a house would include wall tiles only in the bathroom component). - Higher durability / lifecycle factor of specified finishes. The high traffic, coastal environment, and the goal to reduce maintenance & replacement costs were taken into consideration when selecting the finishes for these projects. 5. Specialties: This section includes all restroom accessories such as hand dryers, toilet paper dispensers, soap dispensers, mirrors, grab bars, ADA shower seats, waste receptacles, changing tables, toilet partitions, fire extinguishers and signage. A house does not require all of these items, and a simple commercial building, due to the smaller size of the restroom component would require a much lower number of these items. Furthermore, the items currently specified are corrosion and vandal-resistant; the toilet partitions are scratch and graffiti resistant. 6. Mechanical/Plumbing: high plumbing fixture count to area ratio (high number of plumbing fixtures relative to the size of the building): plumbing is one of the major cost drivers of the project due to the high concentration of fixtures in a relatively small area. A 1,500SF house for example, might have 7 plumbing fixtures (1 per 214 SF) whereas 53rd Street Restrooms & Ocean Rescue facilities have a total of 26 plumbing fixtures in a total 1,410SF (1 per 88SF). The higher cost per square foot of the restroom.component is not offset by standard, lower cost spaces (living/bedroom/office) as it would be when compared to a residential/standard commercial space. 7. Electrical: High concentration of fixtures and associated conduits/wiring per square foot of area. 53rd St has a total of 9 exterior wall sconces and 33 interior light fixtures (15 for Ocean Rescue building and 18 for restrooms building). Furthermore, the cost includes individual electrical panels for each of the buildings (3 total), exit signs, emergency ballasts, convenience outlets, and wiring for hand dryers. 8. Mark-ups: General Conditions: This includes costs associated with project personnel, office supplies, parking expenses, drawing reproductions, courier, construction trailer, etc. Since the majority of the cost is in project personnel (project manager/ superintendent) the larger the project, the smaller the percentage of overall project cost. The stamdard commercial facility example provided is at 10% of overall project cost, however it is a much larger project—67,000SF. The total square footage of the facilities at 53rd Street is 1,410, and the percentage of overall project cost for General Conditions is 13%. Overhead & Profit/ Bond & Insurance: Typically a percentage of overall project cost. In the standard facility example provided above the percentage is 8.5%, while for 53rd Street is at 9.1%. 380 ATTACHMENT 53rd St.an-d Coffins 4W?-, NeW Res-'r.cni FaciaR; City of Miami Beach 53rd St. &Collins and 6th St. &Ocean Drive New Restroom Facilities 100% Construction Documents Estimate Summary - 6th St& Ocean Drive December 11,2012 7, -61 Genera)-- —. 'i -Conditions $ 66,896 02 General Requirements $ 3,000 03 DemolitioniAsbestos Abatement $ 11,060 03a Maintenance Of Traffic(MOT) $ 8,951 04 Sitework $ 56,549 05 Site Furnishings $ 1,000 06 Landscaping&Irrigation $ 22,148 07 Concrete(IncId.Masonry&Metals) $ 120,389 08 Lightweight Insulated Concrete N/A 0 09 Misc.Carpentry $ 1,500 10 Cabinetry N/A 11 Roofing $ 33,189 12 W.P.&Caulking $ 4,639 13 Doors, Frames,Hardware $ 16,038 14 Storefront/Giazing $ 21,939 15 Stucco/Skim Coat Plaster $ 17,738 16 Drywall N/A 16a Wall Finishes(rile,Limestone Cladding,Misc.) N/A 17 Acoustical Ceiling N/A 18 Flooring(Stone/Tile) $ 31,406 19 Epoxy Flooring $ 13,230 20 Painting/VWC $ 13,644 21 Louvers 5,010 22 Specialties 22,390 23 Plumbing 55,497 24 HVAC $ 8,300 25 Electrical $ 36,743 Subtotal Construction Costs $ 571,253 Overhead &Profit 6-5510 37,131 Bonds &insurance 3% 17,138 TOTAL Construction Costs 625,523 4 See Deductive Alternotes rear joage A T, AN If IN S 381 eL� 53ra 5r cr.d Ccliins Ave., Ib=,w R-e stroon7 foam, City of Miami Beach 53rd St. & Collins and 6th St. & Ocean Drive New Restroom Facilities 100% Construction Documents Estimate Summary , 53rd St& Collins Ave. December 11,2012 } 01 Genera)Conditions $ 59,254 02 General Requirements $ 3,500 03 Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $ 24,200 03a Maintenance Of Traffic(MOT) $ 12,449 04 Sitework $ 85,739 05 Site Furnishings N/A 06 Landscaping&Irrigation $ 16,300 07 Concrete(Incld. Masonry&Metals) $ 99,185 08 Lightweight Insulated Concrete $ 3,428 09 Misc.Carpentry $ 7,140 10 Cabinetry $ 3,200 11 Roofing $ 14,265 12 V.P. &Caulking 5 3695 13 Doors, Frames,Hardware $ 18,560 14 Storefront/Glazing $ 4,328 15 Stucco/Skim Coat Plaster $ 17,531 16 Drywall $ 7,068 16a Wall Finishes(Tile,Misc.) N/A 17 Acoustical Ceiling $ 699 18 Flooring(Stone/Tile) $ 19,282 19 Epoxy Flooring $ 5,490 20 Painting/"VC $ 2,619 21 Louvers $ 8,818 22 Specialties $ 26,775 23 Plumbing $ 52,586 24 HVAC $ 11,375 25 Electrical $ 45,546 Subtotal Construction Costs $ 553,031 Overhead& Profit 6.5% $ 35,947 Bonds & Insurance 3% $ 16,591 TOTAL Construction Costs $ 605,559 •'-- S ! ! a ji.Y. • .. rt :i�� �1 s, ; 6a. .,±' �„+,.� � . See Deductore Alternates next pa;e 382 zr.•nsp(� 1 All ;l ! g S U � CU - c CD U � U 0 C o .. .� � CL � m cn O CD O CIO cu C 7C3 _0 4� U � p .o U -� C/3 O cn *cu cn -0 .0 o � � LW 0 � Q to ] O O N i 0 — U ) N cn a) .Q � E-0 cz CL U) ct cn E E C') c" "0 w cz q) +- O O 0 O O o ccdd L- C3 O E 0 > i i U U V 0 '+'r L O 0 43 O cn 0 'i U Q cn cn Q :E oC a. T a. a. 0 9 w 4a • N C6 fit' ui C6 00 m T-- C� 383 ATTACITMENT v IPTHORNTON Project Name: City of Miami Beach-6th St Restroom Date:March 13,2013 PROJECT BREAKDOWN BUILDING TRADES 6TH ST GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 58,284 DEMOLITION I ASBESTOS ABATEMENT $ 11,515 CONCRETE $ 108,388 LIGHT WEIGHT INSULATED CONCRETE N/A MISC.CARPENTRY $ 6,237 CABINETRY N/A ROOFING $ 16,533 W.P.&CAULKING $ 1,200 DOORS,FRAMES,HDW. $ 10,575 STOREFRONT/GLAZING $ 13,280 STUCCO /SKIM COAT PLASTER $ 18,780 DRYWALL N/A ACOUSTICAL CEILING N/A FLOORING(STONE/TILE) $ 53,302 EPDXY FLOORING $ 15,066 PAINTING/VWC $ 7,086 LOUVERS $ 4,681 SPECIALTIES $ 19,131 PLUMBING $ 41,000 HVAC $ 6,300 ELECTRICAL $ 38,402 BUILDING TRADES SUBTOTAL $ 429,760 G.C.FEE @ 7.0% $ 30,083 PAYMENT&PERFORMANCE BOND @ 1.5% $ 6,446 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 1.3% $ 5,372 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE BUILDINGS $ 471,661 SITEWORK TRADES 6TH ST GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 24,979 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $ 15,035 SITEWORK $ 51,023 SITE FURNISHINGS $ 841 LANDSCAPING&IRRIGATION $ 35,587 ELECTRICAL $ 2,522 SITE WORK TRADES SUBTOTAL $ 129,987 G.C.FEE @ 7.0% $ 9,099 PAYMENT&PERFORMANCE BOND @ 1.5% $ 1,950 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 1.3% $ 1,625 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE SITE WORK $ 142,661 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE TOTAL $ 614,322 OWNER ALLOWANCES 6TH ST OWNER'S CONTINGENCY OF APPROX.9% $ 55,289 Page 1of1 384 ATTACHMENT Project Name: City of Miami Beach-53rd Street Restrooms Date: March 13,2013 PROJECT BREAKDOWN BUILDING TRADES 53RD ST RR 53RD ST OR 53RD ST GENERAL CONDITIONS 5 34,272 $ 21,658 $ 55,930 DEMOLITION/ASBESTOS ABATEMENT $ 11,480 $ $ 11,480 CONCRETE $ 48,203 $ 30,462 $ 78,665 LIGHT WEIGHT INSULATED CONCRETE $ - $ 4,900 $ 4,900 MISC.CARPENTRY S 3,657 $ 4,793 $ 8,450 CABINETRY $ 1,235 $ - $ 1,235 ROOFING $ 7,951 $ 7,051 $ 15,002 W.P.&CAULKING $ 858 $ 542 $ 1,400 DOORS,FRAMES,HOW, $ 4,500 $ 9,000 $ 13,500 STOREFRONT/GLAZING $ - $ 3,800 $ 3,800 STUCCO /SKIM COAT PLASTER $ 10,698 $ 8,753 $ 19,450 DRYWALL $ - $ 9,060 $ 9,060 ACOUSTICAL CEILING $ - $ 620 $ 620 FLOORING(STONE/TILE) $ 14,933 $ 16,772 $ 31,705 EPDXY FLOORING $ 7,418 $ - $ 7,418 PAINTINGNWC 5 3,203 $ 2,768 $ 5.971 LOUVERS $ 7,917 S 188 $ 8,105 SPECIALTIES $ 16,016 $ 2,400 $ 18,416 PLUMBING $ 23,633 $ 11,817 $ 35,450 HVAC $ 7,843 t 4,957 $ 12,800 ELECTRICAL $ 31,603 $ 19,972 $ 51,575 BUILDING TRADES SUBTOTAL $ 235,421 $ 159,511 S 394,932 $272.48/SF $292.141SF j 280.091SF G.C.FEE @ $ 16,940 $ 10,705 $ 27,645 PAYMENT&PERFORMANCE BONO @ $ 3,630 $ 2,294 $ 5,924 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE $ 3,025 $ 1,912 $ 4,937 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE BUILDINGS 259,016 S 174,421 S 433A37 $299.79/SF $319.45/SF E307.40/SF SITEWORK TRADES 53RD ST RR 53RD OR 53RD ST GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 14,688 $ 9,282 $ 23,070 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS $ 9,213 $ 5,822 $ 15,035 SITEWORK $ 30,957 $ 30,957 $ 61,914 SITE FURNISHINGS $ 841 $ - $ 841 LANDSCAPING&IRRIGATION $ 7,769 $ 7,769 $ 15,538 ELECTRICAL $ 6,598 $ 15,268 $ 21,867 SITE WORK TRADES SUBTOTAL $ 70,066 $ 69,098 $ 139,164 G.C.FEE @ $ 5,969 $ 3,772 $ 9,742 PAYMENT&PERFORMANCE BOND @ $ 1,279 $ 808 $ 2,087 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE $ 1,066 $ 674 $ 1,740 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE SITE WORK $ 78,381 S 74,352 S 152733 GUARANTEE MAXIMUM PRICE TOTAL 3 337,391 $ 248,774 5 586,1701 ALLOWANCES 53RD ST RR 53RD ST OR 63RD ST ALLOWANCE FOR OCSAN RESCUE TRAILER $ - $ 24,704 $ 24,704 OWNER'S CONTINGENCY OF APPROX.9% $ 33,689 $ 21,290 $ 54,979 385 ATTACHMENT' co ® cz . V > .'�._ d cqo t > :'"" - - I cz •� 0- C: O cn X'" CU c O t!J cn cz tV cn 0 CU �- � V ` v, 'cn _c o •cn E E CD ® ® co � .O +-.0 LL +-r O � p 0 C cn co CD cz cz o- co E b N O O V O L!� cn C Q sow > a �- (� pp U 0 CL cn O Q. O CAS �. O cn Q CZ C)cn CZ ft 0 ca -- ® O U U- ® O 'O 0 0 (f U Cl) 2 cn -j =3 386 M "t o N LL CEO COO N U) LL LL LL.U) cn r- O ll;i U) 00 6 O CO LO N N r CD CM CN CIO Lo •V LL C� ca co -� o Q) .� r r •w 0 O _0 m �" •� .Q O WAR ®_E to U Ca .n 112 u V5 W O Q cu Q C/) 3 O O k 4) .v o 0 cu N o j -� .� a U •c C� cz w � C .� �� �� -c o CD o ® ® o — Q ® Q V C � CZ W LL W Rs e � O 0 <C �- i c — Cl) U) CL N=U ® C) C/) I I I F -be�+ rlr N . 387 ..... t// O\ VY/ CD LL'Id' CV)0 I � V/ � c_ LL. LL. LLL. M co N M N M 69. 69- 619. . LC cc ci c c ci o o LL cc � SO = a U ci cz en cn Cc co cj .. m o �_ o �; cp U S cu cn cz c �+ cn cn cn Q o 'v o 0 ,� o r.cn co 0 LL! L — d. o -v c 0 'N U o, 0 *-, T m EE cc CC loop a o.M gn w < cn cn U3 CD W .� o o Cl) CD 0 cr LO . 388 AYrACHMENT a 6 CERTIFICATION { HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD rM ISTOOMTKATTHEATTACHm'oOarwlart z, , Florida 1S`A'.TRUE;ANO ACMAATE COPY OF THE OFAM ON City of Miami Beach 1tE:..,. E OF PlAtid �. _. I ..f7 / i tria a+:R n is Te at.: 0 ID: MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 1� Unp Rrk>fed! �:SGI W Cori WIC ISaal} G ply_ Notary Public State of rlonda FILE NO: 7243 : Randy Cesar TBii*UnwcwkS5caw My Commission DD975668 9oor doh Expires 07/28/2014 PROPERTY: 599 Ocean Drive— Public Restrooms i LEGAL: 34-53-42 3-54-42 20.AC STRIP OF LAND LYING BETWEEN OCEAN DRIVE &ATLANTIC OCEAN AKA LUMMUS PARK IN RE: The Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the existing restroom facilities and the construction of a new single story restroom facility. ;I ORDER The applicant, the City of Miami Beach, filed an application with the City of Miami Beach Planning Department for a Certificate of Appropriateness. The City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT, based upon the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing and which are part of the record for this matter: A. The existing structure is not classified in the Miami Beach Historic Properties Database and the subject site is located within the Ocean Drive / Collins Avenue Local Historic District and National Register Architectural District. B. Based on the plans and documents submitted with the application, testimony and information provided by the applicant, and the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report, the project as submitted is consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(1) of the Miami Beach Code, is consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(2) of the Miami Beach Code, is consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(3) of the Miami Beach Code, and is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition Criteria'b-e' & 'h' in Section 118-564(f)(4) of the Miami Beach Code. C. The project would be consistent with the criteria and requirements of section 118-564 if the following conditions are met: 1. Revised elevation site.plan and floor plan drawings shall be submitted to and approved by staff; at a minimum, such drawings shall incorporate the following a. A high quality, smooth textured surface shall be required, subject to the review and approval of staff. 389 i R i . Page 2 of 5 HPB File No. 7243 Meeting Date:April 12, 2011 b. The proposed mesh screening on the center portion of the east and west elevations shall be replaced with an alternate, high quality durable material, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. c. The splayed roof overhang shall be increased by a minimum of 2'-0" along the north and south elevations in order to provide increased shelter/shade for the benches below, subject to the review and approval of staff. d. The roof overhang of the east elevation shall be extended an additional five feet for increased coverage of the restroom entrances, subject to the review and approval of staff. e. The chevron patterning proposed for the windows shall be eliminated; a simple frosted glazing shall be utilized, as indicated in the north and south elevations of the architectural drawings, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. f. The final design and details of the proposed signage shall be provided, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. g. The final design and details of the proposed interior and exterior finishes shall be provided, subject to the review and approval of staff. h. Any proposed roll down security housing and tracks shall be completely visually concealed from the building's exterior, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff, or shall otherwise not be permitted. i. Bicycle parking shall be provided on a revised site and floor plan, subject to the review and approval of staff. j. Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new windows, doors and glass shall be required. k. All roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices, shall be clearly noted on a revised roof plan and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be approved by staff. I. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project Architect shall verify, in writing, that the subject project has been constructed in accordance with the plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 2. A revised landscape plan, prepared by a Professional Landscape Architect, registered in the State of Florida, and corresponding site plan, shall be submitted. The species type, quantity, dimensions, spacing, location and overall height of all plant material shall be _clearly_delineated and subject to the review and approval of staff. At aminimum., such plan shall incorporate the following: 390 t s Page 3 of 5 HPB File No. 7243 Meeting Date:April 12, 2011 a. A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain. Right-of- way areas shall also be incorporated as part of the irrigation system. b. The utilization of root barriers and/or structural soil, as applicable, shall be clearly delineated on the revised landscape plan. c. The applicant shall verify, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the exact location of all backflow preventors and all other related devices and fixtures; such fixtures and devices shall not be permitted within any required yard or any area fronting a street or sidewalk. The location of backflow preventors, siamese pipes or other related devices and fixtures, if any, and how they are screened with, _landscape material from the right-of-way, shall be clearly indicated on the site and landscape plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of staff. d. The applicant shall verify, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the exact i location of all applicable FPL transformers or vault rooms; such transformers and vault rooms, and all other related devices and fixtures, shall not be permitted within any required yard or any area fronting a street or sidewalk. The location of any exterior transformers, and how they are screened with landscape material from the right-of-way, shall be clearly indicated on the site and landscape plans s and shall be subject to the review and approval of staff. e. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Landscape Architect for the project architect shall verify, in writing, that the project is consistent with the site and landscape .plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 3. The final exterior surface color scheme, including color samples, shall be subject to the review and approval of staff and shall require a separate permit. 4. All new and altered elements, spaces and areas shall meet the requirements of the Florida Accessibility Code (FAC). r 6 5. The Final Order is not severable, and if any provision or condition hereof is held void or unconstitutional in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, the order shall be returned to the Board far reconsideration as to whether the order meets the criteria for approval absent the stricken provision or condition, and/or it is appropriate to modify the remaining conditions or impose new conditions. 6. The conditions of approval herein are binding on the applicant, the property's owners, operators, and all successors in interest and assigns. 7. Nothing in this order authorizes a violation of the City Code or other applicable law, nor allows a relaxation of any requirement or standard set forth in the City gode. l iT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, which are part of the record for this matter, and the staff report and analysis, which are adopted herein, including the staff 391 Je Page 4 of 5 HPB File No. 7243 Meeting Date:April 12, 2011 recommendations, which were amended by the Board, that the Certificate of Appropriateness is GRANTED for the above-referenced project subject to those certain conditions specified in paragraph C of the Findings of Fact (Condition Nos. 1-7, inclusive) hereof, to which the applicant has agreed. PROVIDED, the applicant shall build substantially in accordance with the plans approved by the Historic Preservation Board, as determined by staff, entitled "6t' Street and Ocean Drive New Restroorn Facilities", as prepared by C3TS Architects, Engineers, Planners, dated 2-25-11. When requesting a building permit, the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, .modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. No building permit 6y be issued unless and until all conditions of approval that must be satisfied prior to permit issuance, as set forth in this Order, have been met. The issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness does not relieve the applicant from obtaining all other required Municipal, County and/or State reviews and permits, including final zoning approval. if adequate handicapped access is not provided on the Board-approved plans, this approval doea not mean that such handicapped access is not required. When requesting,a building permit, the plans submitted to .the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. If the Full Building Permit for the project is not issued within eighteen(18) months of the meeting date at which the original Certificate of Appropriateness was granted, the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. if the Full Building Permit for the project should expire for any reason (including but not limited to construction not commencing and continuing, with required inspections, in accordance with the applicable Building Code), the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. In accordance with Section 118-561 of the City Code, the violation of any conditions and safeguards that are a part of this Order shall be deemed a violation of the land development regulations of the City Code. Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the Certificate of Appropriateness to Section 118-564, City Code,for revocation or modification of the Certificate of Appropriatenessc� Dated this 3}- Y da of 20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD THE C TY OF MIA l 13 H, FLO DA BY: z THOMAS R. M00 EY, l P DESIGN AND PRESERVATION MANAGER FOR THE CHAIR i i 392 Page 5 of 5 MPB File No. 7243 Meeting Date: April 1,2, 2011 STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The fQ egoi:g' instrument was acknowledged before me this :j day of 20_y_by Thomas R. Mooney, Design and Preservation Manager, 1 Planning Department, City of Miami Beach, Florida, a Florida Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me. Notary Public State of Florida Randy Cesar NOTARY PU$L!C t My Commission DD97566a �7 Y__-o� Expires 03128/2014 Miami-Dade County, Florida My commission expires: Approved As To Form: Legal Department: Filed with the Clerk of the Historic Preservation Board on FAPLAN1$HPB111 HP81AprHPB 1117243-APR2011.FO.docac Ei. 4 i t 1 9 l 1 1 393 i HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD City of Miami Beach, Florida CERTIFICAT10N THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT 15 A TRUE AND ACCURA'E C-OP"OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THE OFgCE C.,z -ANNING DEPARTMENT. ±: EA0 Z MEETING DATE: January 11, 2011 �v7!e, {JZSilI Pet �. !" •[n:,7i�!a��t fl ID[ - - FILE NO: 7225 Printed my Co This accurt `tp�o>�s . PROPERTY: 5301 Collins Avenue— 53rd Street Restroomsi .•.. iz iEREAMARIA MY COMMISSION 0 OD 928148 * EXPM:Deommkr 2,2613 I'.orso 8andedThn:$udaet Notary Services LEGAL:. Lots 23 thru 25, "Amended Plat of First Ocean Front Subdivision of the Miami Beach Bay Shore Company", According to the Plat Thereof, as - recorded in Plat Book 9 at Page 178, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. IN RE: The Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the existing restroom facilities and the construction of two (2) new single story structures at the east end of the parking lot which will contain restroom and lifeguard facilities. ORDER The applicant, the City of Miami Beach, filed an application with the City of Miami Beach Planning Department for a Certificate of Appropriateness. The City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT, based upon the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing and which are part of the record for this matter: A. The subject structure is not classified in the Miami Beach Historic Properties Database. The subject property is located within the Morris Lapidus Mid-Century Modern Local Historic District. B. Based on the plans and documents submitted with the application, testimony and information provided by the applicant, and the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report, the project as submitted is consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(1) of the Miami Beach Code, is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria 'b' & 'd-f' in Section 118-564(a)(2) of the Miami Beach Code, is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria 'b' in Section 118-564(a)(3) of the Miami Beach Code, and is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition Criteria 'b-e' & 'h' in Section 118-564(f)(4) of the Miami Beach Code. C. The project would be consistent with the criteria and requirements of section 118-564 if the following conditions are met: L � 394 Page 2 of 4 HPB File No. 7225 Meeting Date: ,January 11, 2011 1. Revised elevation, site plan and floor plan drawings shall be submitted to and approved by staff; at a minimum, such drawings shall incorporate the following: a. The design of the proposed Ocean Rescue building shall be modified to include larger circular windows in the office areas, elimination of the louvers, elimination of the exterior tapered column, and reduction in the projection of the proposed eyebrow, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. b. A high quality, smooth textured surface shall be required, in place of the proposed textured stucco finish, subject to the review and approval of staff. C. The final design and details of the proposed exterior tile, doors, and louvers shall be required, subject to the review and approval of staff. d. Any proposed roil down security housing and tracks shall be completely visually concealed from the building's exterior, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff, or shall otherwise not be permitted. e. Bicycle parking shall be provided on a revised site and floor plan, subject to the review and approval of staff. f. Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new windows, doors and glass shall be required. g. All roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices, shall be clearly noted on a revised roof plan and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be approved by staff. h. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project Architect shall verify, in writing, that the subject project has been constructed in accordance with the plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 2. A revised landscape plan, prepared by: a 'Professional t:andsceip:e Architect,; registered in the State of Florida, and:corresponding site:plan, shall be submitted.: The species type, quantity, dimensions; spacing; location and -over 111 height of all plant material shall be clearly delineated`and subject to the review and a'Rprova.( of staff. At a minimum, such plan shall incorporate the following: a. A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain. Right- of-way areas shall also be incorporated as pact of the irrigation system. b. The utilization of root barriers and/or structural soil, as applicable, shall be clearly delineated on the revised landscape plan. C. The applicant shall verify, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the exact location of all backflow preventors and all other related devices and fixtures; such fixtures and devices shall not be permitted within any required yard or any area fronting a street or sidewalk. The location of backflow preventors, siamese pipes or other related devices and fixtures, if any, and how they are screened with landscape material from the right-of-way, shall be clearly 395 Page 3 of 4 HPB File No. 7225 Meeting Date: January 11, 2011 indicated on the site and landscape plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of staff, d. The applicant shall verify, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the exact location of all applicable FPL transformers or vault rooms; such transformers and vault rooms, and all other related devices and fixtures, shall not be permitted within any required yard or any area fronting a street or sidewalk. The location of any exterior transformers, and how they are screened with landscape material from the right-of-way, shall be clearly indicated on the site and landscape plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of staff. e. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Landscape Architect for the project architect shall verify, in writing, that the project is consistent with the site and landscape plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 3. The final exterior surface color scheme, including color samples, shall be subject to the review and approval of staff and shall require a separate permit. 4. All new and altered elements, spaces and areas shall meet the requirements.of the Florida Accessibility Code (FAC). 5. The Final Order is not severable, and if any provision or condition hereof is held void or unconstitutional in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, the order shall be returned to the Board for reconsideration as to whether the order meets the criteria for approval absent the stricken provision or condition, and/or it is appropriate to modify the remaining conditions or impose new conditions. 6. The conditions of approval herein are binding on the applicant, the property's owners, operators, and all successors in interest and assigns. 7. Nothing in this order authorizes a violation of the City Code or other applicable law, nor allows a relaxation of any requirement or standard set forth in the City Code. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, which are part of the record for this matter, and the staff report and analysis, which are adopted herein, including the staff recommendations, which were amended by the Board, that the Certificate of Appropriateness is GRANTED for the above-referenced project subject to those certain conditions specified in paragraph C of the Findings of Fact (Condition Nos. 1-7, inclusive) hereof, to which the applicant has agreed. PROVIDED, the applicant shall build substantially in accordance with the plans approved by the Historic Preservation Board, as determined by staff, entitled "53rd Street Restroom Facility", as prepared by C3TS Architects, Engineers, Planners, dated 10-28-2010. When requesting a building permit, the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. No building permit may be issued unless and until all conditions of approval that must be satisfied prior to permit issuance, as set forth in this Order, have been met. 396 Page 4 of 4 HPB File No. 7225 Meeting Date: January 11, 2011 The issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness does not relieve the applicant from obtaining all other required Municipal, County and/or State reviews and permits, including final zoning approval. If adequate handicapped access is not provided on the Board-approved plans, this approval does not mean that such handicapped access is not .required. When requesting a building permit, the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit.shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. If the Full Building Permit for the project is not issued within eighteen (18) months of the meeting date at which the original Certificate of Appropriateness was granted, the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. If the Full Building Permit for the project should expire for any reason (including but not limited to construction not commencing and continuing, with required inspections, in accordance with the applicable Building Code), the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. In accordance with Section 118-561 of the City Code, the violation of any conditions and safeguards that are a part of this Order shall be deemed a violation of the land development regulations of the City Code. Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the Certificate of Appropriateness to Section 118-564, City Code, for revocation or modification of the Certificate of Appropriateness yl Dated this da Y of 20,�. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD THE CITY OF IAMI B CH, FLORIDA { BY. t i THO A R. M ONEY, AiCP DESIGN AND PRESERVATION MANAGER FOR THE CHAIR STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS COUNTY OF MiAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y day of 20 /r by Thomas R. Mooney, Design and Preservation Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach, Florida, a Florida Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me. / par Notary Public State of Florida Randy Cesar NOTARY PUBLIC MY Commission 00975668 M'•%" `�� Miami-Dade County, Florida o,K� Expires 09!28/2414 _ 2 F_ Q�y My commission expires: 7 Approved As To Form: Legal Department: Filed with the Clerk of the Historic Preservation Board on FAPLAN\$HPB\11 H PB\JanHPB11\7225-JAN2011.fo.docx 397 1 U.. .� Ul �- 0 L rr i' ` C C f r t X 3 U. x Z m :1! 1 X LL E Ln Ln LA jlP UL- y .l O ��� �k .' -_ .. � • fir.»wee.ys�.cr � pQ QJ m +fo�' ' 1�g• aj1 �� � v d - �/ c Z N N U J Ul er H X �h,Y � 4""Tf°'..w `k h .� �l S.FX� 2' •V O }� (� to w AN pp N N aa` � J � O (U � � 3 � c Q. Z i Q 0 v) O r Co 4) a . . to o G u �a w no a ' x i L . . w 3 a y < O ` h cu f c s. 1 ' V O C 'll � V o .. 3up _ 1 �0 v `•��I1 7 hu.Voa.CO1.t;j781 �a` /L ,/�� L] 1 Z Z s� 71 J.SYQ 1 _ CL v ' 398 K ,t�.. N gig 0 O C k uj ¢r cx LU cn 'r T fi CX' LS- au, .Sir xqua.w,wN. � 'a D: W k CQ Y' `3" �\ ^u +:•aaP y �`Y ii i \ . €t .� LLw _ fy FR LLJ cm ��M5'; C= ate° s"erv�Jia vv. .i._ .,.�»...............c s EI Ea r{ Si 5 "�� i 43 a Yr o5r{e r�IV.,P o 4�a1a,i: �a y�+' s� y�dS #- € CT3 �r r �M Et ; AA gm A. � x F a Fbj Woy� y 399 3.'.t 0 \ t A'T'TACHMENT Z i.�ri vourlasaa LL M !� 0 -- m _ -- o v .. sk lw d. c +� s !o to M 1 m Q W to M li ILI\ LL. to 00 r d -- ...._ .. - .. .. ..b i ----Y' _ \ L`) L' y m to CA 0 zi cu LA z z I-- N N V v aj :43.z+ j I m E °o LA LL m _ Tr N r Ln p i a c z z J 1 m QJ . . LaJ v v a o ---__rte V O � a E c M OW 0 GJ 41 (1)L +-+ o < � zz 400 ZA W r Z • { x cn uj LU CW- Ul uj g . (L1lWJl� x Ln F 1 .o $ Q { _ Q Q LU Lo m �E G f k. .,......._................. .o.,.,,,,wa. x LL Lk 1 iS �t 3 f W ��j.'. j �£ �• 0 J , �r cm LU h� w s, w LL LL LL d O • i _ L�j )b 401