LTC 388-204 South and North Beach Parking Demand Analysis - Walker Parking ConsultantsCa MIAMIBEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
NO. LTC # -5"2/5/
LETTER TO COMMISSION
TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members f the City, ommission
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: November 18, 2014
SUBJECT: SOUTH AND NORTH BEACH PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS - WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
As you may recall, Walker Parking Consultants, Inc. was engaged to perform a parking demand
analysis for the three major geographic areas of the City (South, Middle, and North). Parking
demand projections are derived from parking inventory usage, including data collection; review of
current and future development projects; and, in consultation with the Administration, certain
assumption regarding economic growth, seasonality, and related trends.
In addition, Walker Parking provided parking management strategies, some of which are under
consideration at the committee level; will be in place shortly or in place. These include:
• Expanding residential parking permit hours to 24 hours per day, seven days a week for
certain zones;
• Adding time limit restrictions to residential parking permit zones during periods when the
residential parking restrictions are not in effect, but allowing residential permit holders
exception to posted time limits;
• Providing enhanced wayfinding and signage to direct patrons to the parking, including
displaying the number of available spaces on the signage;
• Increased branding and promotion of public parking;
• Implementing dynamic pricing based on seasonality and occupancy surveys;
• Encouraging car sharing services geared toward residents; and
• Allowing limited car reservations to improve options and increase revenue.
The North Beach Parking Demand Analysis will be presented to the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task
Force on North Beach on Thursday, November 20, 2014, at their regularly scheduled meeting.
The North and South Beach Parking Demand Analysis will be presented to the Finance and
Citywide Project Committee at their meeting on December 12, 2014. The Middle Beach Analysis
is currently underway and a preliminary draft report is anticipated early next year.
If you should have any questions, please contact Saul Frances, Parking Director via email or at
extension 6483.
c: Kathie Brooks, Assistant City Manager
Patricia Walker, Chief Financial Officer
Mark Taxis, Assistant City Manager
Joe Jimenez, Assistant City Manager
Marcia Monserrat, Special Projects Coordinator
Saul Frances, Parking Director
JLM/ : /ST‘
f:\ ping \$ all\ saul\ cmo\ WalkerParkingDemandAnalysisSouthNorthFinalDraft11142014 .1tc.doc
--n
Ahead of the Curve
in creative parking solutions
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
NORTH BEACH
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
OCTOBER 14, 2014
COMBINED REPORT
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PROJECT NO. 15- 1988.00
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
NORTH BEACH
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
OCTOBER 14, 2014
41# WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 198800
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II
INTRODUCTION 1
Key Objectives 1
Study Area 1
Definition of Terms 4
Summary of Inventory 5
Parking Inventory 5
Observation Periods 6
Effective Parking Supply 6
CURRENT CONDITIONS 8
Town Center Observations 8
North Shore Observations 10
Biscayne Beach Observations 11
Normandy Shores Observations 12
Normandy Isle Observations 13
Parking Occupancy Heat Maps 13
Parking Adequacy 18
Town Center Parking Adequacy 18
North Shore Parking Adequacy 20
Biscayne Beach Parking Adequacy 23
Normandy Shores Parking Adequacy 24
Normandy Isle Parking Adequacy 25
Residential Parking Demand 27
Parking Turnover 29
Parking Turnover- Northern Areas 31
FUTURE CONDITIONS 33
Planned Developments 33
Changes to Parking Supply 34
Historical Growth 34
Growth Scenarios 35
Future Parking Adequacy 36
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 38
Residential Parking Zones 38
Options within Residential Parking Zones 38
Enhanced Wayfinding and Signage 39
Branding and Promotion of Parking 39
Dynamic Pricing 40
Car Sharing Programs 41
Parking Reservations 41
APPENDIX: OCCUPANCY MAPS
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
viiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1: Study Area Map - Town Center 2
Figure 2: Study Area Map - Northern Area 3
Figure 3: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy (Town Center) 14
Figure 4: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy (Town Center) 15
Figure 5: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 16
Figure 6: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 17
Table 1: Summary of Parking Inventory 5
Table 2: Effective Parking Supply by Area 7
Table 3: Town Center Occupancy Observations 9
Table 4: North Shore Occupancy Observations 10
Table 5: Biscayne Beach Occupancy Observations 11
Table 6: Normandy Shores Occupancy Observations 12
Table 7: Normandy Isle Occupancy Observations 13
Table 8: North Beach - Parking Adequacy 18
Table 9: North Beach - Parking Adequacy by Block 18
Table 10: North Shore - Parking Adequacy 20
Table 11: North Shore - Parking Adequacy by Block 20
Table 12: Biscayne Beach - Parking Adequacy 23
Table 13: Biscayne Beach - Parking Adequacy by Block 23
Table 14: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy 24
Table 15: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy by Block 25
Table 16: Normandy Isle - Parking Adequacy 25
Table 17: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy by Block 25
Table 18: Residential Parking Observations 27
Table 19: Town Center - Weekday Occupancy Sample 29
Table 20: Town Center - Weekday Length of Stay 29
Table 21: Town Center - Weekend Occupancy Sample 30
Table 22: Town Center - Weekend Length of Stay 30
Table 23: Northern Areas - Weekday Occupancy Sample 31
Table 24: Northern Areas - Weekday Length of Stay 31
Table 25: Northern Areas - Weekend Occupancy Sample 32
Table 26: Northern Areas - Weekend Length of Stay 32
Table 27: Future Project 33
Table 28: Added Parking Demand 34
Table 29: Historical Annual Growth Data 35
Table 30: Annual Growth Scenarios 35
Table 31: Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Town Center 36
Table 32: Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Northern Areas 36
ii
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
464 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Miami Beach engaged Walker Parking Consultants to analyze the current and
future parking conditions within key portions of the City. The focus of this report is North Beach;
sub - divided into the Town Center area and the North Shore area. Also included in this analysis
are Biscayne Beach, Normandy Shores, and Normandy Isle.
The following provides an executive summary of the findings. The full report provides a
detailed analysis.
CURRENT CONDITIONS
A total of 20,859± spaces were inventoried within the overall study area. This does not include
unmarked on- street parking within single family residential areas or private residential parking
garages. Private off - street parking accounts for 65± percent of the overall parking supply;
on- street parking accounts for 27± percent; City owned and operated surface lots account for
6± percent and the remaining 2± percent is public parking provided by the public sector.
There are no parking garages owned or operated by the City within the study area. Inventory
of restricted parking areas that could not be directly observed are based on the size of the
development and required parking ratio or actual numbers provided by the City Planning
Department.
Summary of Parking Inventory
Off - Street
Public
On- Street City Lot Garage Public Lot Private Total:
Town Center 758 676 428 11 7,944 9,817
Sub- Total: 758 676 428 11 7,944 9,817
North Shore 2,210 518 - - 3,196 5,924
Biscayne Beach 779 - - - 314 1,093
Normandy Shores 167 - - - 234 401
Normandy Isle 1,764 73 - - 1,787 3,624
Sub - Total: 4,920 591 0 0 5,531 11,042
Grand - Total: 5,678 1,267 428 11 13,475 20,859
Percentages
27.2% 6.1% 2.1% 0.1% 64.6%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
iii
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Parking demand generally peaked during the evening Saturday count periods, with the
exception of the North Shore and Town Center areas, which experienced slightly higher
occupancy during the 4:00 p.m. count, and Normandy Isle, which peaked during the
weekday evening count. Private parking that was not directly observable is counted as being
full, which influences the overall occupancy to some degree.
To better understand the occupancy, it is important to review each specific type of parking.
On- street parking was consistently occupied at higher levels than other types of parking and
City Lots increased during non - enforcement periods. The following graphs illustrate the
parking occupancy for each time period and area. Not included are single family resident
parking areas, which do not have a defined number of spaces, thus occupancy cannot be
calculated based on a percentage of use.
Town Center - Weekday
92% 92%
81%
11:00 AM
80%
87%
91%
2:COPM 7:00 PM
u On- Street a Off- Street City
Off- Street Public o Off- Street Private
Town Center - Saturday
94% 93% 93% 93% 92% 92%
11.1 11.1
12:00 PM
4:00 PM 9:00 PM
O On- Street u Off- Street City
Off- Street Public g Off - Street Private
iv
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
85%
North Shore - Saturday
9296 92%
51% 55% 52%
12:00 PM
4:00 PM 9:00 PM
• On- Street • Off- Street Private
The Biscayne Beach data only includes the portion containing a mix of multi - family residential
units. Areas with single family homes were excluded from this table. No City owned lots are
located in this area.
Biscayne Beach - Weekday
77%
57%
o On- Street • Off- Street Private
Biscayne Beach - Saturday
7096
53%
76% 79%
67%
60%
12:00 PM
4:00 PM 9:00 PM
• On- Street ■ Off - Street Private
v
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The Normandy Shores area is limited to two blocks which contain multi - family residents. No
City owned parking lots are located within this area.
Normandy Shores - Weekday
95%
94%
98%
11:00 AM
2:00 PM
7:00 PM
■On- Street • Off- Street Private
Normandy Shores - Saturday
89%
76%
95%
81%
98%
84%
12:00 PM 4:00 PM 9:00 PM
■ On- Street • Off- Street Private
The Normandy Isle data does not include some areas with only single family homes. Count
data for these areas is provided in the full report, but not reflected in these graphs.
Normandy Isle - Weekday
67%
62%
18%
11:00 AM
75%
65%
8%
2:00 PM
85%
7:00 PM
• On- Street u Off- Street City • Off- Street Private
82%
Normandy Isle - Saturday
62%
27%
12:00 PM
82%
59%
37%
1
89%
629(61%
4:00 PM 9:00 PM
M On- Street u Off- Street City • Off- Street Private
vi
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
/4 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
HEAT MAP
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The following maps show parking demand for the entire area during the Saturday count when
the overall peak was observed, starting with the Town Center area followed by the remaining
areas.
Parking Demand Heat Maps - Overall Peak Observation Period
Legend - Occupancy Saturday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
CI Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85% Private
Occupancy >85%
1 Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
I
fvftt E •
•
vii
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15-1988.00
Lel
c ley telt,
Arm .
Oi 0
- -
c
10
1Z,t , 0
1 i
,
.
4
,'
_ .,it,...,,.- —
6 ..... C
- II .,=m---. _,,i
* -i 7,11 ;-.• •-•
fr ID a7,it eiel e:
• ..-> 7-,„
•••_..t.-.4_ -7,••- t,
etisi.tik,••;,,,, al a
lir_ ._ .....,,,
...„: ''' ,... Z
••_,
•
1.4",,, • 6
p
Normandy Shores
andy Isle
1,3
4
Occupancy - Saturday 9 pm
Study Areas it Occupancy >85%
Block Numbers Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy ..69%
---,Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
Future parking conditions are based on adding demand and supply changes from the
redevelopment projects provided by the Miami Beach Planning Department, either currently
under construction or planned. Changes to the parking supply are based on specific
information provided in the plan or assuming either 1.5 spaces per residential unit or no new
parking if the redevelopment project meets exception standards for adding units to
multifamily structures in the National Register Historic Districts.
In addition, three potential growth scenarios are provided based on the Economic Conditions
report data specific to North Beach and the overall area, compiled and provided by the
Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development Department. The three annual growth scenarios
used to project the overall change in the parking demand are shown in the table below.
Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
(Smallest Average Annual Growth)
(Median Average Growth)
(80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
1 2.5%
2 3.9%
3 6.8%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
The projected parking adequacy is shown using the known developments and growth
scenario assumptions applied to the observed parking demand for the Town Center area
below.
Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Town Center
Year EPS
2015 9,196 8,999 197
2016 9,196 9,054 142
2017 9,196 9,110 86
2018 9,196 9,168 28
2019 9,196 9,227 (31)
2020 9,196 9,288 (92)
2021 9,196 9,350 (154)
2022 9,196 9,414 (218)
2023 9,196 9,479 (283)
2024 9,196 9,546 (350)
47(
.732
•
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
ix
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The same methodology is used to project parking adequacy of the remaining areas within the
North Beach study area.
Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Remaining Areas
2015 9,984 7,971 2,013
2016 9,984 8,150 1,834
2017 10,193 8,508 1,685
2018 10,193 8,701 1,492
2019 10,193 8,898 1,295
2020 10,193 9,100 1,093
2021 10,193 9,307 886
2022 10,193 9,519 674
2023 10,193 9,737 456
2024 10,193 9,960 233
(358)
(743)
( 1,143)
4,620
.946)
2,719)
(3,545)
N (4,427)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
FUTURE PARKING NEEDS SUMMARY
Considering the overall parking adequacy within the study area, when considering parking
adequacy as a whole, it may appear to be adequate for the immediate future. While this
could be stated as the condition within the larger area, it is somewhat misleading, as half the
parking is considered private or restricted for specific users. The primary land use within the
study area is residential, which has limited ability to expand based on the current occupancy
levels. More likely, increased parking demand will come from redevelopment projects.
Several blocks throughout the study area currently experience high demand and are
considered to have inadequate parking based on observations. Future growth in parking
demand is very likely based on the historical census data and more areas will likely experience
deficits in parking adequacy further adding to those areas already experiencing deficits in
parking.
Partnering with a private developer to include building additional public parking spaces within
future developments in critical areas is one option to increase public parking without the
necessity of building a standalone parking facility or smaller surface lots. This option may also
include allowing the improvement of a public parking asset by a private developer with
conditions that any existing parking be replaced and expanded upon. These options should
only be pursued where parking is in demand and shown to be needed.
Other options to explore include possible expansion of existing facilities, acquiring privately
owned facilities in need of repair, and implementing parking management strategies to
distribute parking demand or reduce parking demand.
x
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Several parking management strategies are provided in the report, including:
• Implementing a residential parking permit program to ensure local residents are given
priority parking where issues exist;
• Exempting residents from certain time limit restrictions where residential parking permit
zones are implemented;
• Providing enhanced wayfinding and signage to direct patrons to available public
parking, including displaying the number of available spaces on the signage;
• Increased branding and promotion of public parking;
• Implementing dynamic pricing based on seasonality and occupancy surveys;
• Encouraging car sharing services geared toward residents; and
• Allowing limited car reservations to improve options and increase revenue.
xi
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AalWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
INTRODUCTION
The City of Miami Beach ( "the City ") engaged Walker Parking Consultants ( "Walker ") to
conduct a parking supply and demand analysis for various areas of the City. The focus of this
report is the North Beach area, including Biscayne Beach and Normandy Isles. The purpose of
the study is to quantify current and future parking conditions based on various development
scenarios to assist in the overall parking management plan of the City. Walker had previously
completed a large scale supply /demand analysis in selected areas of Miami Beach in 2004.
While the study areas are not an exact match, several of the areas overlap and assist in
quantifying the parking supply, demand, and unique challenges in managing public parking
for the City.
KEY OBJECTIVES
• Update the physical inventory of parking spaces within the study area.
• Project future demand based on planned projects within the study area and potential
future growth.
STUDY AREA
The complete North Beach study area generally encompasses the area from 63rd Street to the
south to 87th Terrace to the north including Biscayne Beach, Normandy Isle, and Normandy
Shores. For purposes of evaluating the northern area, observations were extended roughly
one block to the north to 87th Street, as 87th Terrace does not run continuous through the study
area.
The entire study area is broken down by uniquely numbered blocks within each sub -area or
sections of roadway for single family residential areas. The southern portion of the overall
North Beach study area is Town Center; the northern portions of the study area include North
Shore, Biscayne Beach, Normandy Isle, and Normandy Shores. The study areas are outlined in
the following maps.
1
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 1: Study Area Map - Town Center
Base Study Area Map
Study Area
Block Numbers
Source: Google Earth Pro and Walker Parking Consultants
7,41,0 St
75th St f- " - --1
i 01
t 12 ci
i
i z'
St 1 l
rya Not
"'.hamt
7t
11 n�
CD I
3rd St
� t
r
13 10
f
72nd St i
23 — 09
71st St
D n=i C7
cr
o (22 X15 N_ 08 ii
t
t x..
•
2
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 2: Study Area Map - Northern Area
Biscayne Beach
Normandy Shores
G
ain
113
A ,ske '8 -;,liffq
20
rill '' `= .....,...„
_ ,
ft .10.1 , .,...
-,:z.-4
. . ,...4
ei .44.1,..4
..
ai�aas aw11.ilr
.1-1591
Normandy Isle
Base Study Area Map
Study Areas
Block Numbers
Source: Google Earth Pro and Walker Parking Consultants
3
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
DEFINITION OF TERMS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Several terms used in this summary have unique meanings when used in the parking industry.
To help clarify these terms and enhance understanding by the reader, definitions for some of
these terms are presented below.
• Demand - The number of parking spaces recommended to satisfy the visitor, employee
and resident demand on a given day.
• Demand Generator - Any building, structure, business, or attraction that brings
individuals into the study area, thereby increasing parking demand and occupancy.
• Effective Parking Supply (EPS) - The actual inventory adjusted to provide the optimum
number of parking spaces before parking is typically perceived as being insufficient.
This "cushion" in the parking inventory accounts for some spaces lost due vehicles
parked in two spaces, spaces lost for repair or temporary blockage and for the time
needed for patrons to locate the last few available spaces. The cushion also accounts
for the dynamics of vehicles moving in and out of spaces which can lead to "cruising"
for the last few open spaces.
• Effective Supply Factor (ESF) - The adjustment factor used to calculate the Effective
Parking Supply.
• Inventory - The total number of parking spaces identified and counted during survey
day observations. The intent of this study is to account for all parking within defined
geographical areas of study.
• Occupancy (Counts) - The number of vehicles observed parked on each survey day.
• Parking Adequacy - The difference between the effective parking supply and
demand.
• Private Parking - A parking space that is restricted from public access and reserved for
private use, regardless of ownership.
• Public Parking - A parking space that is available for use by the general public on an
hourly, daily and /or monthly basis.
• Survey Days - The days that the parking occupancy counts were conducted in the
study areas.
• Survey Times - The time of the survey on the Survey Day. The time generally represents
the start time of the data collection
4
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SUMMARY OF INVENTORY
Parking within the defined area was inventoried and classified as either on- street, off - street
public, or off - street private. The off - street public parking facilities were further classified as a
City owned and operated parking Iot1; public garage; or public lot. Private parking is any
parking restricted for a particular user, such as employee, resident or specific business. Only
patrons of that particular venue are permitted to park in that parking facility during their visit to
the business. The primary source of private parking are surface Tots with several located on the
ground floor of residential apartments or condominiums. In addition to marked parking areas,
the study area included several single family residential areas without curbs or marked street
parking. Parking counts were conducted in these areas but not inventory, as parking typically
occurs within the grass areas and not in actual spaces.
PARKING INVENTORY
A total of 20,859± spaces were inventoried within the overall study area. This does not include
unmarked on- street parking within single family residential areas which were counted only for
the number of vehicles parking. Private off - street parking accounts for 65 percent of the
overall parking supply; on- street parking accounts for 27 percent; City owned and operated
surface lots account for 6 percent; and the remaining 2 percent is public paid parking. There
are no City owned parking garages open to general public within the study area. Inventory of
restricted parking areas that could not be directly observed are based on the size of the
development and required parking ratio or actual numbers provided by the City Planning
department. Table 1 depicts a summary of the total parking inventory by area.
Table 1: Summary of Parking Inventory (sub - totaled by area /map)
Off - Street
Public
On- Street City Lot Garage Public Lot Private Total:
Town Center 758 676 428 11 7,944 9,817
Sub - Total: 758 676 428 11 7,944 9,817
North Shore 2,210 518 - - 3,196 5,924
Biscayne Beach 779 - - - 314 1,093
Normandy Shores 167 - - - 234 401
Normandy Isle 1,764 73 - - 1,787 3,624
Sub - Total: 4,920 591 0 0 5,531 11,042
Grand - Total: 5,678 1,267 428 11 13,475 20,859
Percentages
27.2% 6.1% 2.1% 0.1% 64.6%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
The City does not operate any parking garages within the Study Area.
5
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
OBSERVATION PERIODS
Weekday parking occupancy counts were made on a Thursday, at 1 1:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., and
7:00 p.m. Weekend counts were made on a Saturday, at 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m.
The Town Center area was observed the week of April 7th and the remaining areas were
observed the week of July 21st.
The observation periods were agreed upon at the start of the project during a meeting with
the City.
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
The inventory of parking within the study area is adjusted to allow for a cushion necessary for
vehicles moving in and out of spaces, reduce the time necessary to find the last few
remaining spaces when the parking supply is nearly full, spaces lost due to mis- parked
vehicles, temporary construction, and restricted spaces. To account for this cushion, the
parking inventory is adjusted to reflect the Effective Parking Supply ( "EPS "). We derive the EPS
by deducting this cushion from the total parking capacity.
A parking system operates at peak efficiency when parking occupancy is at 85 to 95 percent
of the supply. When occupancy exceeds this level, patrons may experience delays and
frustration while searching for a space; moreover, the parking supply may be perceived as
inadequate, even though spaces are available within the parking system. As a result, we use
the effective supply when analyzing the adequacy of the parking system, rather than the total
supply or inventory of spaces. The following factors affect the efficiency of a parking system:
➢ Capacity - Large, scattered surface Tots operate less efficiently than a more compact
facility, such as a double- threaded helix parking structure, which offers one -way traffic
that passes each available parking space one time. Moreover, it is difficult to find the
available spaces in a widespread parking area rather than in a centralized parking
area.
• Type of users - Monthly or regular parking patrons can find the available spaces more
efficiently than infrequent visitors because they are familiar with the location of the
parking options and typically know where the spaces will be available before they
park.
• On- street vs. Off - street - On- street parking is less efficient than off - street due to the time
it takes patrons to find the last few vacant on- street spaces. In addition, patrons are
typically limited to using one side of the street at a time and often must parallel park in
traffic to use an on- street space.
For this analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on- street
spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces and 95% for off - street private spaces. The total EPS is
calculated at 19,180 spaces, as shown in the following table.
6
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
.litaWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 2: Effective Parking Supply by Area
Off - Street
Public
On- Street City Lot Garage Public Lot Private Total:
ESF 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95
Town Center 643 609 385 10 7,549 9,196
Sub - Total: 643 609 385 10 7,549 9,196
North Shore 1,881 466 - - 3,043 5,390
Biscayne Beach 664 - - - 300 964
Normandy Shores 142 - - - 222 364
Normandy Isle 1,498 67 - - 1,701 3,266
Sub - Total: 4,185 533 0 0 5,266 9,984
Grand - Total:
4,828 1,142 385 10 12,815 19,180
*EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
7
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
ioWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
CURRENT CONDITIONS
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday of all inventoried
parking spaces within the study area. Observations within the Town Center area were made
on Thursday, April 10, 2014 and the Saturday observations were made on Saturday April 12,
2014. The northern areas were observed on Thursday, July 24th and the Saturday observations
were made on July 26th. Weather conditions during the observations were good with sunny
and warm temperatures.
The following sections provide a summary of the observations for both the weekday and
Saturday periods with the overall peak observation period identified for each major sub -area.
TOWN CENTER OBSERVATIONS
The overall observed occupancy levels were high, varying from 84 to 90 percent during both
days. Saturday occupancy was observed to experience the highest occupancy level, at
90 percent during the 4:00 pm count. Private parking that was not directly observable is
counted as being full, which influences the overall occupancy to some degree. To better
understand the occupancy, it is important to review each specific type of parking. On- street
parking was consistently higher during the Saturday count, reaching a high of 94 percent. City
parking lots reached a high of 84 percent on Saturday.
Weekday counts for these areas were all lower, although on- street parking reached 87
percent during the evening Thursday count. The sole public parking garage experienced low
occupancy during all counts and reached peak occupancy of only 36 percent during the
4:00 pm count on Saturday.
The following table provides a summary of the observations for both periods.
8
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
*WAKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 3: Town Center Occupancy Observations
WEEKDAY
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
Inventory 11:00 AM 2: 7:00 PM
758 615 605 658
81% 80% 87%
143 153 100
67. 247 258 280
37% 38% 41%
418 396
Public Garage 428
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off- Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
85 78 58
20% 18% 14%
343 350 370
7,304
92%
640
9,817 8,260
84%
1,557
7,338 7,241
92% 91%
606 703
8,285
84%
1,532
8,245
84%
1,572
PEAK
HOUR
SATURDAY Inventory 12:00 P 9:00 PM
On- Street MIL 758
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
714 702 696
94% 93% 92%
44 56 62
676 395 567 371
58% 84% 55%
281 109 305
Public Garage 111 428
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces j
103 152 123
24% 36% 29%
325 276 305
Public Lot 9
Occupancy Rate 82%
Unoccupied Space 2
Off- Street Private 7,944
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
10 6
91% 55%
1 5
7,419 7,391 7,324
93% 93% 92%
525 553 620
9,817 8,640 8,822 8,520
88% 90% 87%
1,177 995 1,297
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
9
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
NORTH SHORE OBSERVATIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The overall peak observation within North Shore occurred during the 4:00 pm observation on
Saturday, with 69 percent of the spaces being occupied. Added demand for beach and
park visitors was evident as the City parking lots along Collins Avenue experienced heavier use
than other periods during this observation. Occupancy during the weekday period peaked at
63 percent during the 7:00 pm observation.
On- street parking consistently experienced the highest occupancy levels, with 84 percent
during a weekday and 92 percent during a Saturday. During the observations several blocks
experienced high occupancy at or above 85 percent.
Table 4: North Shore Occupancy Observations
North Shore
Rate
iupieed Spaces
1
11200AM'
PEAK
HOUR
SATURDAY
1,422 1,505 1,856 On- Street
64% 6 84% Occupan
788 705 354 Unoccupied Spc c s
PEAK
HOUR
20
Private 3,196
Or Rote
�pfed Spaces
139 145 Public tlty'lot
27% 28% Occupancy Rate`
379 373 Unoccupied Spaces
1,516 1,475 1,734 Ott -She& loft
47% 46% 54% Occupancy kti t
1,680 1,721 1,462 Unoccupied Spaces
24
518
d6%
279
5,924 3,046 3,119 3,735 Total
51% 53% 63% Occupancy%'R
2,878 2,805 2,189 Unoccupied Spaces
led Spaces
1,627
51%
1,569
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
10
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AglWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
BISCAYNE BEACH OBSERVATIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Biscayne Beach is a residential area with a mix of multi - family and single family residential units.
The focus of our analysis is in the multi - family residential area. Overall, peak parking
occupancy of 75 percent was observed during the Saturday 9:00 pm count. The peak
weekday observation occurred during the 7:00 pm count with 71 percent occupancy.
Several blocks were observed to experience occupancy above 85 percent within the overall
area.
Table 5: Biscayne Beach Occupancy Observations
Biscayne Beach
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupf
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
Off - Street Privat
Occupancy Rat
Unoccupied Space
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Space
34
43%
180
576
53%
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Space
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
Inventory 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 9:00 PM
614
76% 79%
190 165
Off- Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
0
0
167 188 209
53% 'a DSO% 67%
47 126 105
total
Occupancy Rate
!occupied Spaces
777 823
1% 75%
270
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
NORMANDY SHORES OBSERVATIONS
The Normandy Shores occupancy data includes only two blocks with inventoried parking
capacity, thus the analysis represents a concentrated observation and analysis of the parking
demand. The single family residential areas within this area are excluded in the occupancy
analysis, as parking within these areas is generally limited to parking in grass areas along the
roadways. This count data is provided separately within this report.
Overall occupancy within the two blocks was recorded at 92 percent during the Saturday
9:00 pm count and 90 percent during the 7:00 pm weekday count.
Table 6: Normandy Shores Occupancy Observations
Normandy Shores
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces_
PEAK
HOUR
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate'
Unoccupied Spaces
Off - Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Space
Total
Occupan y a . e
Unoccupied Spaces
Occupancy Rat
Unoccupied Space
PEAK
HOUR
Inventory rirw 12:00 PM 4:00 PM . _., ?:00 PM
40
84%
27
=°Public City Lot
-::Occupancy Rate
noccupied Spaces
°Off- Street Private
'Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total'
Occupancy ; d 'e
noccupied Spaces
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
12
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
NORMANDY ISLE OBSERVATIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Normandy Isle experienced overall peak occupancy peak occupancy levels of 76 percent
during the weekday 7:00 pm observation period compared to a peak Saturday observation of
74 percent during the 9:00 pm count. On- street occupancy reached 90 percent and several
blocks experienced occupancy at or above 85 percent.
Table 7: Normandy Isle Occupancy Observations
Normandy Isle
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Space
Off - Street Priva
Occupancy Rate
Unoccu
T
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
SATURDAY Inventory 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 9:00 PM
On-Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
1,453 ` '! 1,438 1,567
s
82% 82% 89%
311 .'326 197
?Off- Street Priva e
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
27 45
37% 62%
46 28
1,063 1,083
59% 61%
724 704
Total .�. `_ °� 2,528 2,695
Occupancy Rate 71% 70% 74%
inoccupied,Spaces � 1,051.:,, 1,096 929
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
PARKING OCCUPANCY HEAT MAPS
To illustrate parking occupancy in greater detail, heat maps were developed to depict the
parking demand observed during the overall peak Weekday and Saturday counts.
13
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 3: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy (Town Center)
Legend - Occupancy Weekday 2pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85% Private
Occupancy >85%
l Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
I I
I
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
14
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 4: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy (Town Center)
Legend - Occupancy Saturday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy Z0% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
Ai
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
76th St
75th St f - — —1_
15
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 5: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
North Shore
Ito
01 =
■
Biscayne Beach-
Normandy Shores
,401
c
0443A c c
4, _1. ;-
lc Pp A;5,4;31
asd , 1 0 C
rmanc
Occupancy - Weekday 7 pm
• • Study Areas
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
1 Occupancy >70% - 84%
1 Occupancy s69%
Single Family Homes
A
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
16
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 6: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Occupancy - Saturday 9 pm
Study Areas
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >85% Single Family Homes
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy 5.69%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
17
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING ADEQUACY
Parking adequacy is defined as the ability of the parking supply to accommodate the
demand. The parking demand can vary throughout the year due to seasonality, weather,
and local events. For comparison purposes, our analysis considers the observed peak
conditions as representative of the parking demand for the area. The observed demand is
subtracted from the effective parking supply to provide our opinion of the parking adequacy
within the area.
The following is an evaluation of the overall parking adequacy by each sub -area.
TOWN CENTER PARKING ADEQUACY
Considering Town Center as a whole, on- street parking is shown to operate at a deficit level
during the overall peak. The following table shows the overall parking adequacy (surplus or
deficit) of parking spaces within the study area.
Table 8: North Beach - Parking Adequacy
Off - Street
On- Street
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
643
702
609
567
385
152
10
10
7,549
7,391
9,196
8,822
Adequacy
(59) 42 233 0 158 374
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
To illustrate this data on a block -by -block basis, the following table provides the data by block.
Table 9: North Beach - Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Priv ate
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
1
0
312
312
296
(16)
2
0
432
432
410
(22)
3
0
79
774
853
803
(50)
4
0
1,666
1,666
1,583
(83)
5
0
276
276
262
(14)
6
0
446
446
424
(22)
7
0
311
311
295
(16)
8
0
485
485
461
(24)
(continued on next page)
18
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AgikWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Priv ate
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
9
15
540
555
513
(42)
10
16
16
13
(3)
11
65
138
203
191
(12)
1 2
78
1 1 1
189
171
(18)
13
29
304
333
312
(21)
14
19
9
28
44
16
15
23
17
36
76
139
63
16
71
473
544
557
13
17
17
152
67
236
540
304
18
7
74
81
74
(7)
19
0
10
31
41
39
(2)
20
0
95
95
140
45
21
82
36
118
112
(6)
22
26
40
49
115
164
49
23
13
7
20
47
27
24
8
8
16
19
3
25
18
16
285
319
436
117
26
41
45
86
85
(1)
27
0
563
563
535
(28)
28
0
162
162
162
0
29
22
22
15
(7)
30
42
33
75
82
7
31
16
16
32
16
32
13
29
42
52
10
33
4
4
7
3
34
7
9
16
69
53
35
14
14
38
24
36
16
16
11
(5)
37
18
18
32
14
38
13
13
10
(3)
39
9
9
21
12
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
19
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
vi,,.,,.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
NORTH SHORE PARKING ADEQUACY
Considering North Shore as a whole, on- street parking is shown to operate at a deficit level
during the overall peak. The following table shows the overall parking adequacy (surplus or
deficit) of parking spaces within the study area.
Table 10: North Shore - Parking Adequacy
Off - Street
On- Street
City Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
1,881
2,025
466
333
3,043
1,758
5,390
4,116
Adequacy
(144) 133 1,285 1,274
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
To illustrate this data on a block -by -block basis, the following table provides the data by block.
Table 11: North Shore - Parking Adequacy by Block
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
101
0
0
14
14
18
4
102
0
0
56
56
82
26
103
0
0
28
28
47
19
104
23
0
288
311
346
35
105
0
6
27
33
33
0
106
8
0
166
174
330
156
107
19
0
27
46
43
(3)
(continued on next page)
20
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
108
48
16
0
64
103
39
109
41
0
31
72
66
(6)
111
62
0
2
64
60
(4)
113
87
0
0
87
79
(8)
115
50
0
0
50
49
(1)
116
10
0
0
10
15
5
117
31
0
0
31
35
4
119
65
0
1
66
70
4
121
56
0
15
71
69
(2)
123
35
0
34
69
89
20
124
3
1 1 1
0
114
102
(12)
125
19
0
4
23
50
27
127
16
0
10
26
20
(6)
128
26
0
0
26
21
(5)
129
24
0
0
24
22
(2)
130
22
0
4
26
21
(5)
131
18
0
5
23
176
153
132
27
0
36
63
66
3
133
35
0
3
38
29
(9)
134
29
0
11
40
50
10
135
22
0
1
23
18
(5)
137
31
0
0
31
138
107
138
7
0
0
7
8
1
139
3
0
0
3
5
2
140
33
0
25
58
54
(4)
142
23
0
31
54
80
26
143
30
0
6
36
32
(4)
(continued on next page)
21
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
144
28
0
4
32
33
1
145
26
0
0
26
30
4
146
29
0
9
38
55
17
147
33
0
32
65
72
7
148
29
0
11
40
39
(1)
149
29
0
13
42
56
14
150
26
0
32
58
93
35
151
39
0
9
48
46
(2)
152
39
0
21
60
67
7
154
32
0
50
82
117
35
155
2
0
0
2
5
3
156
78
0
0
78
68
(10)
157
22
27
21
70
94
24
159
32
0
4
36
30
(6)
160
26
0
30
56
53
(3)
161
32
0
5
37
33
(4)
162
16
0
0
16
22
6
163
20
0
29
49
62
13
164
20
0
0
20
20
0
165
36
0
2
38
51
13
166
37
0
15
52
60
8
168
28
38
26
92
130
38
169
24
0
4
28
39
11
171
31
0
32
63
90
27
172
20
0
30
50
75
25
173
3
0
24
27
50
23
174
18
0
18
36
55
19
176
32
0
35
67
100
33
177
24
48
0
72
122
50
179
36
21
11
68
99
31
180
30
0
22
52
67
15
181
52
0
20
72
84
12
183
24
52
5
81
91
10
184
28
0
14
42
61
19
(continued on next page)
22
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
186
36
0
19
55
70
15
187
23
0
28
51
79
28
188
29
0
168
197
306
109
189
20
0
10
30
52
22
191
4
14
12
30
61
31
192
20
0
58
78
90
12
193
0
0
110
110
129
19
194
9
0
0
9
8
(1)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
BISCAYNE BEACH PARKING ADEQUACY
Considering Biscayne Beach as a whole, overall parking is considered adequate, with a small
surplus. The following table shows the overall parking adequacy (surplus or deficit) of parking
spaces within the study area.
Table 12: Biscayne Beach - Parking Adequacy
Off - Street
On- Street
City Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
664
614
0
0
300
209
964
823
Adequacy
50 0 91 141
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
To illustrate this data on a block -by -block basis, the following table provides the data by block.
Table 13: Biscayne Beach - Parking Adequacy by Block
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
201
7
0
0
7
7
0
202
15
0
0
15
15
0
203
10
0
0
10
20
10
206
7
0
0
7
5
(2)
(continued on next page)
23
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
411k PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
207
10
0
0
10
13
3
208
1
0
6
7
10
3
209
34
0
19
53
65
12
210
38
0
24
62
56
(6)
211
26
0
0
26
23
(3)
212
29
0
0
29
35
6
213
26
0
12
38
37
(1)
214
30
0
7
37
34
(3)
215
85
0
18
103
96
(7)
216
75
0
6
81
77
(4)
217
113
0
7
120
118
(2)
218
64
0
56
120
133
13
219
37
0
46
83
154
71
220
0
0
8
8
42
34
221
7
0
0
7
24
17
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
NORMANDY SHORES PARKING ADEQUACY
Considering Normandy Shores as a whole, overall parking is at a deficit level. The main reason
is the lack of private parking to meet the peak parking demand. The following table shows
the overall parking adequacy (surplus or deficit) of parking spaces within the study area.
Table 14: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy
Off - Street
On-Street
City Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
142
140
0
0
222
230
364
370
Adequacy
2 0 (8) (6)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
To illustrate this data on a block -by -block basis, the following table provides the data by block.
24
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AilWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 15: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy by Block
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
408
55
0
0
55
49
(6)
414
85
0
230
315
315
0
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
NORMANDY ISLE PARKING ADEQUACY
Considering Normandy Isle as a whole, overall parking is considered adequate, with a surplus
due to the private parking supply. Public parking is very limited, with most public parking
spaces limited to on- street parking, which has no surplus. The following table shows the overall
parking adequacy of parking spaces within the study area.
Table 16: Normandy Isle - Parking Adequacy
Off - Street
On- Street
City Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
1,453
1,453
67
29
1,701
1,226
3,221
2,708
Adequacy
0 38 475 513
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
To illustrate this data on a block -by -block basis, the following table provides the data by block.
Table 17: Normandy Shores - Parking Adequacy by Block
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
501
17
0
44
61
85
24
502
53
0
309
362
361
(1)
503
61
0
13
74
70
(4)
508
61
0
71
132
170
38
509
32
0
50
82
102
20
510
15
0
22
37
38
1
(continued on next page)
25
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block #
On- Street
Public City
Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
511
30
0
31
61
67
6
512
0
0
5
5
8
3
513
88
0
97
185
235
50
518
104
0
50
154
174
20
519
53
20
104
177
201
24
520
58
0
40
98
102
4
521
15
0
40
55
57
2
525
3
0
9
12
53
41
526
18
0
89
107
161
54
527
17
0
32
49
58
9
528
68
0
0
68
82
14
529
49
0
53
102
145
43
530
67
0
0
67
75
8
531
35
0
0
35
32
(3)
532
46
0
0
46
43
(3)
533
15
0
42
57
62
5
546
42
0
5
47
50
3
534
39
9
27
75
112
37
535
30
0
46
76
100
24
536
123
0
21
144
179
35
537
16
0
0
16
24
8
538
18
0
0
18
17
(1)
539
61
0
4
65
87
22
540
68
0
0
68
78
10
541
30
0
0
30
37
7
542
43
0
0
43
52
9
545
78
0
22
100
104
4
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
26
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
RESIDENTIAL PARKING DEMAND
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Several areas within the overall study area is devoted to residential land uses. In areas where
single family homes are predominant, parking is limited to private driveways and along the
street. In most cases on- street parking is not marked or non - existent. A count of actual
vehicles parked along these roadways was conducted and tabulated below. These areas
are shown on the map as dashed lines and correspond to the table below.
Table 18: Residential Parking Observations
Weekday
Saturday
Area # 11:00 AM 3:00 PM 7:00 PM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 9:00 PM
204 18 21 20 15 17 11
205 6 7 7 3 11 12
301 3 8 3 7 6 4
302 9 6 1 4 8 3
303 9 7 1 3 1 3
304 1 2 0 0 0 0
305 14 8 4 5 4 2
306 6 5 2 7 6 8
308 0 0 0 1 1 3
309 3 3 1 1 3 3
310 3 1 3 1 0 0
311 1 0 0 0 1 3
312 2 1 1 1 1 12
313 0 0 0 2 2 2
314 5 1 2 2 1 1
315 6 4 0 1 1 0
316 10 7 2 6 6 7
401 33 23 28 21 19 14
402 0 0 0 0 0 0
403 0 1 0 0 1 0
404 2 4 1 3 1 1
405 3 6 7 7 8 5
406 1 6 4 1 1 0
407 0 4 4 9 11 5
(continued on next page)
27
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AlkWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
Area #
409
410
411
412
413
504
505
506
507
514
515
516
517
543
544
Weekday 1
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Saturday
11:00 AM 3:00 PM 7:00 PM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 9:00 PM
17 20 28 16 33 14
1 1 1 1 2 0
31 24 12 53 26 2
0 2 0 0 0 1
1 1 2 1 1 1
7 7 6 13 8 12
5 3 2 1 1 2
10 8 9 12 18 13
9 7 8 2 4 6
10 12 17 11 16 22
9 5 11 9 11 12
13 13 18 14 19 18
9 7 6 9 10 10
0 0 0 0 0 0
12 11 15 20 16 18
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
28
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Walker conducted a parking turnover analysis using a sample of parking spaces within the
study area. Spaces were observed on an hourly basis over the course of a day, and each
space was noted as being empty or with a portion of parked vehicle's license plate number
on a weekday and a weekend. The data allows the average length of stay to be calculated
as well as the parking utilization of the sample. The tables below summarize the specific
samples for the weekday and weekend observations for Town Center (collected in April 2014)
and the remaining areas (collected in July 2014).
Table 19: Town Center - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Peak Hour
Area
Street
Location
Sample
10:30am
11:30am
12:30pm
1:30pm
2:30pm
3:30pm
4:30pm
5:30pm
12:30pm
TC
MB Lot 81
lot
15
8
8
10
9
10
9
7
7
o^ v^ v o. o o ,o ,o
N
TC
Colins
67th Street
11
11
11
11
10
8
10
9
11
TC
Colins
69th Street
15
9
12
14
12
12
14
13
15
TC
Colins
71st Street
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
TC
73rd Street
Colins
15
13
15
14
13
13
14
13
11
TC
Ocean Terrace
73rd Street
19
15
19
19
15
14
15
19
17
TC
Colins
74th Street
12
8
10
10
11
12
11
12
12
TC
Byron
71st Street
26
21
22
20
19
22
22
21
21
TC
69th Street
Abbot
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
3
5
TC
Britt Bay Park
Lot
7
7
4
6
6
4
0
3
2
Totals
% Occupied
133 105 113 117 108 107 108 107 108 117
79% 85% 88% 81% 80% 81% 80% 81% 88%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Friday, April 11, 2014
Table 20: Town Center - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Area
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
MB lot 81
Colins
Colins
Colins
73rd Street
Ocean Terrace
Colins
Byron
69th Street
Britt Bay Park
lot
67th Street
69th Street
71st Street
Colins
73rd Street
74th Street
71st Street
Abbot
Lot
15
11
15
7
15
19
12
26
6
7
Length of Stay
11 6 1 3 0 1 0 3
17 8 5 3 0 2 0 1
28 18 1 4 2 0 0 1
18 9 0 3 0 0 0 1
36 13 4 0 1 2 1 1
25 29 6 2 1 2 1 0
41 9 0 0 1 0 2 1
7 11 4 7 2 2 3 7
10 1 0 2 3 0 1 0
12 1 3 1 1 0 0 0
Average
2.7
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.8
2.0
1.6
3.9
2.5
1.8
Totals:
Total Hours:
133 205 105
24
25
11
9
8
15
205 210 72 100 55 54 56 120
2.3
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Friday, April 11, 2014
29
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
i44
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 21: Town Center - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Peak Hour
Area
Street:
Location:
Total
Inventory
12 :00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
3:00 PM
TC
Harding Street
72nd
27
15
15
21
19
15
20
16
20
19
TC
69th Street
Harding
6
5
5
3
4
4
3
3
6
4
TC
Colins
69th Street
21
16
19
19
20
19
18
19
20
20
TC
72nd
Colins
10
10
7
10
10
9
8
10
10
10
TC
Colins
73rd Street
11
11
11
10
11
10
11
9
10
11
TC
74th Street
Colins
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
TC
Ocean
74th Street
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
TC
73rd Street
Ocean
12
11
11
10
11
12
11
1 1
10
11
TC
Abbott
69th Street
26
26
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
TC
Britt Bay Park
Lot
10
9
10
9
10
10
10
10
9
10
TC
MB 81
West
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
23
Totals
% Occupied
162 142 141 146 149 143 144 141 147 149
88% 87% 90% 92% 88% 89% 87% 91% 92%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Saturday, April 12, 2014
Table 22: Town Center - Weekend Length of Stay
LP1 Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Area
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
TC
Harding Street
72nd
27
61
10
9
1
2
1
0
1
1.7
TC
69th Street
Harding
6
7
5
1
0
1
0
0
1
2.2
TC
Colins
69th Street
21
70
20
6
2
0
1
0
1
1.5
TC
72nd
Colins
10
43
12
1
1
0
0
0
0
1.3
TC
Colins
73rd Street
11
34
14
3
1
0
0
0
1
1.6
TC
74th Street
Colins
6
9
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
2.8
TC
Ocean
74th Street
10
10
10
7
4
1
0
1
0
2.4
TC
73rd Street
Ocean
12
17
6
5
3
2
1
1
1
2.4
TC
Abbott
69th Street
26
11
2
5
5
1
2
2
15
4.7
TC
Britt Bay Park
Lot
10
5
3
3
3
0
1
1
4
3.9
TC
MB 81
West
23
11
6
9
3
4
3
5
6
3.9
Totals:
Total Hours:
162 278
88
50
25
13
9
11
31
278 176 150 100 65 54 77 248
2.3
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Saturday, April 12, 2014
30
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER — NORTHERN AREAS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 23: Northern Areas - Weekday Occupancy Sample
121 Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Area
Street:
Location
Sample
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
4:00 PM
NS
Byron
73rd
52
44
47
49
50
48
51
51
51
NS
Carlyle
77th
30
20
19
20
19
15
14
15
14
NS
80th Street
Harding
23
13
10
13
14
16
15
16
15
NS
Lot 91
lot
25
19
15
12
13
13
12
13
12
NS
lot 106
lot
49
28
31
40
40
36
41
40
41
NI
Maimonides St
Vichy
36
32
33
28
22
27
25
19
25
NI
Brest Esplanade
Biarritz
65
57
49
53
55
63
63
64
63
NI
Normandy
Trouville Espanade
27
16
14
15
15
13
21
22
21
NI
Lot 87
lot
25
5
8
5
6
2
2
4
2
Totals
% Occupied
332 234 226 235 234 233 244 244 244
70% 68% 71% 70% 70% 73% 73% 73%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Friday, July 25, 2014
Table 24: Northern Areas - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Area
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
Average
s.. p
NS
Byron
73rd
52
24
19
9
8
6
7
21
3.6
NS
Carlyle
77th
30
13
4
10
10
2
0
3
2.9
NS
80th Street
Harding
23
28
5
2
4
2
1
3
2.2
NS
lot 91
lot
25
23
8
2
1
3
2
3
2.3
NS
Lot 106
lot
49
56
30
22
6
2
2
4
2.1
NI
Maimonides St
Vichy
36
33
19
13
6
2
2
4
2.4
NI
Brest Esplanade
Biarritz
65
39
20
17
10
3
5
27
3.3
NI
Normandy
Trouville Espanade
27
13
12
2
4
3
0
6
2.9
NI
lot 87
lot
25
16
4
0
2
0
0
0
1.5
Totals:
Total Hours:
332 245 121
77
51
23
19
71
245 242 231 204 115 114 497
2.6
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Friday, July 25, 2014
31
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
ViWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 25: Northern Areas - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Peak Hour
Area
Street:
Location
Sample
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
11:00 AM
NI
Normandy
Vichy
11
11
11
6
5
6
3
3
5
11
NI
Maimon ides St
Notre Dame
37
33
35
17
13
12
13
15
10
33
NI
Trouville Esplanades
Normandy
21
15
16
11
12
9
14
16
15
15
NI
Lot 87
lot
26
17
12
12
14
15
10
8
12
17
NI
Vendrome
71st
34
33
33
34
34
33
34
33
34
33
PVI
Wayne Ave
73rd Street
24
19
17
17
16
23
22
24
20
19
NS
73rd
Dickens
17
17
17
16
13
13
14
16
15
17
NS
Byron
73rd
26
25
26
26
25
26
26
26
26
25
NS
74th
Byron
21
21
19
20
19
20
20
20
20
21
NS
PB 106
Lot
44
41
40
44
43
44
43
44
44
41
NS
81st
Harding
11
10
11
11
10
11
10
10
11
10
Totals
% Occupied
272 242 237 214 204 212 209 215 212 242
89% 87% 79% 75% 78% 77% 79% 78% 89%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Saturday, July 26, 2014
Table 26: Northern Areas - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Area
Street:
location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
NI
Normandy
Vichy
11
8
8
2
3
0
0
0
1
2.3
NI
Maimonides St
Notre Dame
37
17
22
5
4
2
2
1
3
2.6
NI
Trouville Esplanad Normandy
21
24
17
4
3
0
3
0
1
2.6
NI
Lot 87
lot
26
40
7
1
1
3
0
0
3
1.8
NI
Vendrome
71st
34
12
10
8
3
5
8
1
15
4.3
PVI
Wayne Ave
73rd Street
24
19
7
7
6
2
1
0
8
3.2
NS
73rd
Dickens
17
4
7
9
2
1
0
1
7
19
NS
Byron
73rd
26
6
3
5
1
1
3
0
19
5.4
NS
74th
Byron
21
9
5
1
5
2
2
1
11
4.4
NS
PB 106
Lot
44
39
35
18
16
4
5
6
3
2.7
NS
81st
Harding
11
8
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
3.8
Totals:
Total Hours:
272 186 123
62
46
21
25
11
76
186 246 186 184 105 150 77 608
3.1
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, Saturday, July 26, 2014
32
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
The basis for projecting short -term future parking conditions is based on adding the parking
demand and supply changes of planned developments within the study area. Known or
planned developments consist of projects registered with the Miami Beach Planning
Department that include details on the planned type and size of the land use. Some of these
projects are currently under construction while others are still in the planning stage. In addition
to accounting the known projects, historical growth rates of criteria that directly influence
area activity and parking demand are applied to project potential Tong -term parking
conditions.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
Several residential - multi - family condominium projects within the study area are included in
the near term. All but one is assumed to include some additional parking. The following table
details the projects and assumptions. Impacts to parking conditions from the projects are
assumed to occur within the next three years.
Table 27: Future Project
BLOCK
Description
Residential
(Units)
Retail
(SF)
Parking
Spaces
Lost
Parking
191 -192
Mixed -Use
24
10,960
200
97
408
Residential -Condo
43
86
-
513
Residential -Condo
6
12
-
521
Residential -Condo
4
8
-
536
Residential -Condo
6
12
-
127
Residential -Condo
4
8
-
210
Residential -Condo
4
8
-
169
Residential -Condo
4
8
-
184
Residential -Condo
6
-
-
209
Residential -Condo
18
36
-
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Based on the size of the project, additional parking demand of 174 spaces during the peak
observation period is projected. Demand is calculated by multiplying the number of units by
the base demand ratio and adjusting by demand factors as shown in the following table.
33
NORTH BEACH WALKER
PARKING CCNVSUUANTS
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 28: Added Parking Demand
Total Added Land Use:
Base Demand Ra
Non - Captive Ratio
Drive Ratio
Time of Day
119
10,960
4,00
0.20
0.80
.00
Added Demand
Total Demand:
167
174
7
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
Surface parking adjacent to the existing Howard Johnsons Hotel will be displaced along with
vacated on- street parking along 87th Terrace for the new condominium development at
8701 N. Collins. New parking is planned at this site within a parking structure, which includes
mechanical lifts to increase capacity. Each new residential development is assumed to
provide 1.5 spaces per unit unless more detailed information is available. The only exception is
for additions to existing apartments and apartment - hotels in which the existing building will be
substantially retained, preserved, and restored that are located within National Register
District, up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet, which do not require providing any additional
parking per ordinance.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for the North Beach study area. The basis of the data is the Economic
Conditions report compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development
Department. Factors considered include North Beach annual hospitality sales; average daily
population statistics; hotel occupancy rate; and North Beach jobs. Annual growth rates are
calculated for each period covering 2007 - 2012 as shown in the following table. The criteria
for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the number jobs, which indicate
a steady decline.
34
Residential
Retail
Description
(Units)
(SF)
Total Added Land Use:
Base Demand Ra
Non - Captive Ratio
Drive Ratio
Time of Day
119
10,960
4,00
0.20
0.80
.00
Added Demand
Total Demand:
167
174
7
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
Surface parking adjacent to the existing Howard Johnsons Hotel will be displaced along with
vacated on- street parking along 87th Terrace for the new condominium development at
8701 N. Collins. New parking is planned at this site within a parking structure, which includes
mechanical lifts to increase capacity. Each new residential development is assumed to
provide 1.5 spaces per unit unless more detailed information is available. The only exception is
for additions to existing apartments and apartment - hotels in which the existing building will be
substantially retained, preserved, and restored that are located within National Register
District, up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet, which do not require providing any additional
parking per ordinance.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for the North Beach study area. The basis of the data is the Economic
Conditions report compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development
Department. Factors considered include North Beach annual hospitality sales; average daily
population statistics; hotel occupancy rate; and North Beach jobs. Annual growth rates are
calculated for each period covering 2007 - 2012 as shown in the following table. The criteria
for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the number jobs, which indicate
a steady decline.
34
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 29: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria
yPt, Hotel Room Sales
Food Sales
z
Alcohol Sales
Hospitality Sales
'07112 '08 112 '09112 '10 112 '11112
6.9% 7.5% 8.3% 12.5% 100.1%
8.0% 9.4% 10.1% 11.0% 15.3%
8.0% 5.8% 8.4% 10.4% 4.7%
7.3% 8.0% 8.8% 11.9% 56.6%
Average Daily Population
4.3% 5.7% 4.9% 5.2% 10.1%
Hotel Occupancy
Jobs
Average Annual Growth
0.6% 1.1% 5.1% 5.3% 0.2%
-2.3% -3.3% -3.2% -4.0% -4.9%
2.5% 2.9% 3.9% 4.6% 15.5%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data shown in the previous table and our understanding of the
potential for development within the selected study area, three annual growth scenarios were
developed to project the overall change in the parking demand. The annual growth rate
percentage scenarios are shown below.
Table 30: Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 2.5% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 3.9% (Median Average Growth)
3 6.8% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
35
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44} WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The projected parking adequacy over the next ten years is provided for Town Center and the
northern areas for each of the three annual growth rate scenarios. The projections shown
assume the listed future projects are completed and occupied within the next 36 months.
Private parking areas are excluded from the annual growth as they are already counted as
being fully occupied.
Table 31: Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Town Center
2015 9,196 8,999 197
2016 9,196 9,054 142
2017 9,196 9,110 86
2018 9,196 9,168 28
2019 9,196 9,227 (31)
2020 9,196 9,288 (92)
2021 9,196 9,350 (154)
2022 9,196 9,414 (218)
2023 9,196 9,479 (283)
2024 9,196 9,546 (350)
9,497
,- 51 5)
9,824 (628) 10 (1,47
9,942 .... (746) 1 0,928' (1,732
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 32: Projected Future Parking Adequacy - Northern Areas
Year EPS
Scenario 1
Demand Adequacy
2015 9,984
2016 9,984
2017 10,193
2018 10,193
2019 10,193
2020 10,193
2021 10,193
2022 10,193
2023 10,193
2024 10,193
7,971 2,013
8,150 1,834
8,508 1,685
8,701 1,492
8,898 1,295
9,100 1,093
9,307 886
9,519 674
9,737 456
9,960 233
9,152.
9,482
9,825
10,181
10,551
10,936
11,336
10,102
10,737 (544)
11,415 (1,222)
12,139 (1,946)
12,912 (2,719)
13,738 (3,545)
14,620 (4,427)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
36
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Considering the overall parking adequacy within the study area, parking appears to be
adequate for the immediate future. While this is the condition within the larger area, it is
somewhat misleading, as half the parking is considered private or restricted for specific user.
The primary land use within the study area is residential, which may have limited ability to
expand based on the current occupancy levels. More likely, increased parking demand will
come from redevelopment projects.
Several blocks throughout the study area currently experience high demand and are
considered to have inadequate parking based on observations. Future growth in parking
demand is very likely based on the historical census data and more areas will likely experience
deficits in parking adequacy further adding to those areas already experiencing deficits in
parking.
37
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The following strategies are provided to enhance or improve the parking experience or
reduce parking demand within the study area.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING ZONES
The City of Miami Beach currently provides residential parking zones
in several areas of South Beach. Residential parking zones allow the
on- street parking located in residential area to be used by legitimate
residents located within the zone. Establishing a residential parking
zone requires a majority of the local residents within the specific zone
to vote and approve the parking zone. Once established, only
residents within the area qualify to obtain a residential parking
permit. This allows normally unrestricted parking to be reserved for
residents and a limited number of guests to ensure non - residents do
not park within the residential parking zone during the posted
restricted time periods.
OPTIONS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL PARKING ZONES
Specific Days /Hours of enforcement: This applies the restrictions during specific periods when
residents are most likely in need of parking, such as in the evenings and weekends. This allows
the spaces to be used by non - residents during un- restricted parking times.
Residential zones to 24/7 enforcement: While this provides a solution, it greatly reduces the
availability of parking in certain areas that would otherwise benefit from sharing the parking
assets when they are typically not needed by residents.
Adding paid parking for times during un- restricted parking: Parking meters are already
located in some residential parking zones for use during non - restricted time periods. This can
be effective, but may not be aesthetically desirable for some residential areas. In addition,
the cost to install and maintain may not be justifiable as the main reason some of these un-
restricted spaces are used is because there is no fee to park in these spaces.
Adding time restrictions during un- restricted parking periods: This option promotes turnover of
the spaces during non - restricted time periods; however, it does require additional
enforcement. It may also be a disadvantage for actual residents parking in the area.
Adding restrictions for non - residents while providing exemptions to permit holders: This option
adds restrictions to non - residential permit holders during un- restricted time periods to
encourage turn -over and discourages abuse of the parking during non - restricted time periods.
Monterey, California allows residential permit holders to enjoy parking in their permit zones and
to ignore posted time limit restrictions. In addition, registered permit holders may pay a
discount for parking if payment is required.
38
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
To enforce unique restrictions within residential zones, a database of valid permit holder
vehicle license plates allows mobile license plate recognition cameras to scan and identify
non - registered vehicles. These systems can also be used to track length of stay for non-
registered vehicles. While not 100 percent, these systems can greatly improve enforcement
and reduce the time needed to manually check each vehicle within an area and allow more
frequent checks to verify length of stay.
ENHANCED WAYFINDING AND SIGNAGE
Each city owned public parking lot is clearly marked and uniformly signed within the study
area. The information provided corresponds to the information found on the Miami Beach
parking App, hosted by ParkMe. The area of parking wayfinding that could be improved is
signage guiding patrons to the off - street parking. Additional directional signage along key
thoroughfares should be added to direct patrons to parking so that more than one sign is
provided to guide patrons to the public parking.
At some point dynamic signage can be added that shows the number of available spaces or
if spaces are available with an arrow to provide directions. This is typically done for garages or
larger surface lots where equipment is in place and tracking the counts. Strategically placed
signs with real time dynamic messages can direct users to the nearest parking facility with
available spaces. Although more common in Europe, several U.S. cities, including Seattle, San
Jose, and Charlotte have installed these types of parking wayfinding systems.
Dynamic wayfinding signage installed in Seattle, Washington
BRANDING AND PROMOTING PARKING
Miami Beach has a website incorporated with the city website, as well as an App, to assist in
promoting parking. Some cities have taken this a step further by branding their parking
program with a unique logo and phrase. Branding examples include SF Park in San Francisco,
L.A. Express Park in Los Angeles, the "Five Seasons" Transportation and Parking Department of
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and "Central City Parking" in Downtown Kalamazoo, Michigan. Branding
can assist with educating the public on parking and providing a recognizable image to go to
when thinking about parking.
39
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Verbal elements should include a name, style, and taglines. Visual elements include fonts,
colors, shapes, and graphic elements (including logo). The elements and standards of the
program should be used in a consistent manner. Ubiquity is achieved by using a full range of
appropriate media.
Actively communicating and marketing the available public
parking spaces is a never ending marketing campaign. Many
cities have developed brochures with a map showing public
parking areas, city web -site links to a page that contains
downtown parking information, and consistent signage and
banners directing customers to public parking areas. The city's
webpage can be linked to merchant and downtown association
websites to encourage visitors to learn about parking before
coming downtown. Downtown businesses and government
offices should have parking brochures with maps available for the
general public.
Evanston, Illinois, developed a "Where to park in Downtown
Evanston" flyer and provided a copy on ticketed vehicles. The
brochure includes a map of public parking options with rates
designed to assist parkers so that they can avoid a ticket in the
future.
DYNAMIC PRICING
WHTOWN
EVANSTON
Charging for parking is an effective strategy to encourage turnover and reducing parking
demand. Some cities have effectively instituted dynamic pricing to further manage parking
demand based the actual parking demand. Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco all use
parking occupancy to adjust on- street parking rates. Generally, occupancy greater than 85
percent results in a higher price. Occupancy levels below 85 percent result in a lower parking
rate. Over time, this approach has been shown to spread parking demand to underutilized
areas. Occupancy can be measured with sensors or regular visual counts. Changes to
parking rates are typically subject to a maximum adjustment amount, frequency, and
advance notification of changes.
Los Angeles California uses variable pricing by time of day, to reduce prices during known low
demand periods and increase rates during known peak demand periods.
This strategy may be useful in Miami Beach during peak weekends or in season demand
periods. Increases in funds may be used to add additional parking or features to the system.
The popularity of the area may limit the effectiveness of the program in Miami Beach, as there
are limited areas in the study area to redistribute parking demand during peak demand
periods.
40
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
OCTOBER 14, 2014
CAR SHARING PROGRAMS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Car sharing was noted as available in at least one location in Miami Beach at the 500 Collins
garage. Car sharing can reduce parking demand by providing a network of privately owned
vehicles that are rented by the hour or day to registered users. Costs for using a vehicle
include all typical ownership costs, including gas and insurance. By having a car share service
available, participants can have use of a vehicle when needed without having to actually
own a vehicle. Studies and surveys indicate each car share vehicle in service can be used by
6 to 10 households, thus reducing parking and traffic congestion where successfully
implemented.
• 2005 Transportation Research Board reported 21 percent of
car share members gave up a vehicle after joining.
• 2006 survey by Flexcar and Zipcar in Washington DC
indicated 30 percent of car share members gave up a
vehicle after joining and 61 percent postponed purchasing
another vehicle.
Some cities assist in promoting car sharing by providing
strategically reserved parking spaces to store vehicles when not in
use. Vendors include Zipcar, Hertz Connect, U -Haul Car Share,
and Enterprise Car Share.
The large number of residential units in North Beach could allow car sharing to reduce parking
demand and give residents a viable option to vehicle ownership.
PARKING RESERVATIONS
Allowing parking reservations may be an option to increase the level of service and provide
premium pricing. Parking reservations allow users to request a parking space in advance if
available and guarantee that space with a premium charge. Users receive a confirming bar
code that can be presented to enter the facility even when the facility is shown as full. This
type of system can be used to reduce stress for users and increase revenue for the parking
facility. While currently limited based on the current infrastructure in North Beach, this could
be a strategy for consideration at some privately owned parking facilities.
41
APPENDIX
OCCUPANCY MAPS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Legend - Occupancy Weekday 11 am
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Legend - Occupancy Weekday 2pm
• • Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 2285% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
VASSI
1
I 1
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Legend - Occupancy Weekday 7pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
1
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Legend - Occupancy Saturday 12pm
— — Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15 -1 988.00
Legend - Occupancy Saturday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
0 Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
I 1
[ 1
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Legend - Occupancy Saturday 9pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >_85% Private
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy ZO% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
Ai
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Normandy Shores
row
Occupancy - Weekday 11 am
Study Areas
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Occupancy - Weekday 3 pm
Study Areas
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy <69%
Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
OA,
-' 4∎ ` lie , M i. •+!, j i�F. ;«
Normandy Shores
•
•
Occupancy - Weekday 7 pm
Study Areas
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy s69%
Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Normandy Shores
1 4.'lif,.-__ 12'71 T, -��. . =.
�a� .' ,,...,rim N,
7
,rte - • �,/
i , •i
'.�` c
o'fico
4.4
solczeez C
CIEC C C
gal
Z
ormand Isle
Occupancy - Saturday 12 pm
Study Areas
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy s69%
Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Normandy Shores
s .
`..
..j
Normandy Isle
Occupancy - Saturday 4 pm
• • Study Areas
0 Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Single Family Homes
NORTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Occupancy - Saturday 9 pm
Study Areas
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy >70% - 84%
Occupancy s69%
Single Family Homes
w
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
SOUTH BEACH
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
AUGUST 22, 2014
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PROJECT NO. 15- 1988.00
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
SOUTH BEACH
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
AUGUST 22, 2014
'4 PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vi
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
INTRODUCTION 1
Key Objectives 1
Study Areas 1
Summary of Inventory 2
Parking Inventory 3
Observation Periods 4
Definition of Terms 5
ZONE 1: ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR 6
INTRODUCTION 7
Study Area 7
Parking inventory 7
Effective Parking Supply 8
CURRENT CONDITIONS 9
Parking Occupancy Detail 10
Parking Adequacy 13
Parking Turnover 15
FUTURE CONDITIONS 17
Planned Developments 17
Changes to Parking Supply 18
Historical Growth 18
Growth Scenarios 19
Future Parking Adequacy 20
Alton Road Parking District 20
No Parking Required 18
ZONE 2: CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR 22
INTRODUCTION 23
Study Area 23
Parking inventory 23
Effective Parking Supply 24
CURRENT CONDITIONS 25
Parking Occupancy Detail 26
Parking Adequacy 29
Parking Turnover 31
FUTURE CONDITIONS 33
Planned Developments 33
Changes to Parking Supply 34
Historical Growth 34
Growth Scenarios 35
Future Parking Adequacy 36
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
ZONE 3: RESIDENTIAL CORE BETWEEN 5TH AND 17TH STREETS 37
INTRODUCTION 38
Study Area 38
Parking inventory 38
Effective Parking Supply 39
CURRENT CONDITIONS 40
Parking Occupancy Detail 41
Parking Adequacy 44
Parking Turnover 47
FUTURE CONDITIONS 49
Planned Developments 49
Changes to Parking Supply 50
Historical Growth 50
Growth Scenarios 51
Future Parking Adequacy 51
ZONE 4: OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR 52
INTRODUCTION 53
Study Area 53
Parking inventory 53
Effective Parking Supply 54
CURRENT CONDITIONS 55
Parking Occupancy Detail 56
Adjusting observations due to weather 59
Parking Adequacy 59
Parking Turnover Analysis 61
FUTURE CONDITIONS 63
Planned Developments 63
Changes to Parking Supply 64
Historical Growth 64
Growth Scenarios 65
Future Parking Adequacy 65
ZONE 5: SOUTH POINTE 66
INTRODUCTION 67
Study Area 67
Parking inventory 67
Effective Parking Supply 68
CURRENT CONDITIONS 69
Parking Occupancy Detail 70
Parking Adequacy 72
Parking Turnover Analysis 74
ii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS 76
Planned Developments 76
Changes to Parking Supply 77
Historical Growth 78
Growth Scenarios 78
Future Parking Adequacy 79
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND ALTERNATIVES 80
RESIDENTIAL PARKING ZONES 81
Observations 81
Options 82
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 83
Enhanced Wayfinding and Signage 83
Branding and Promoting Parking 84
Dynamic Pricing 84
Car Sharing Programs 85
Parking Reservations 85
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1 - ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE
OCCUPANCY MAPS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
OCCUPANCY MAPS
iii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Overall Study Area Map 2
Figure 2: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 11
Figure 3: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 12
Figure 4: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 27
Figure 5: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 28
Figure 6: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 42
Figure 7: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 43
Figure 8: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 57
Figure 9: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 58
Figure 10: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy 70
Figure 11: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy 71
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Summary of Parking Inventory 3
Table 2: Weekday Observation Times 4
Table 3: Saturday Observation Times 4
Table 4: Zone 1 Parking Inventory Detail 7
Table 5: Zone 1 Effective Parking Supply 8
Table 6: Zone 1 Occupancy Observations 9
Table 7: Zone 1 Parking Adequacy 13
Table 8: Zone 1 Parking Adequacy by Block 13
Table 9: Zone 1 - Weekday Occupancy Sample 15
Table 10: Zone 1 - Weekday Length of Stay 15
Table 11: Zone 1 - Weekend Occupancy Sample 16
Table 12: Zone 1 - Weekend Length of Stay 16
Table 13: Zone 1 Planned Projects 17
Table 14: Zone 1 Added Parking Demand 18
Table 15: Historical Annual Growth Data 19
Table 16: Zone 1 Annual Growth Scenarios 19
Table 17: Projected Future Parking Adequacy 20
Table 18: Zone 2 Parking Inventory Detail 23
Table 19: Zone 2 Effective Parking Supply 24
Table 20: Zone 2 Occupancy Observations 25
Table 21: Zone 2 Parking Adequacy 29
Table 22: Zone 2 Parking Adequacy by Block 30
Table 23: Zone 2 - Weekday Occupancy Sample 31
Table 24: Zone 2 - Weekday Length of Stay 31
Table 25: Zone 2 - Weekend Occupancy Sample 32
Table 26: Zone 2 - Weekend Length of Stay 32
Table 27: Zone 2 Planned Projects 33
Table 28: Zone 2 Added Parking Demand 34
Table 29: Historical Annual Growth Data 35
Table 30: Zone 2 Annual Growth Scenarios 35
Table 31: Projected Future Parking Adequacy 36
iv
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 32: Zone 3 Parking Inventory Detail 38
Table 33: Zone 3 Effective Parking Supply 39
Table 34: Zone 3 Occupancy Observations 40
Table 35: Zone 3 Parking Adequacy 44
Table 36: Zone 3 Parking Adequacy by Block 44
Table 37: Zone 3 - Weekday Occupancy Sample 47
Table 38: Zone 3 - Weekday Length of Stay 47
Table 39: Zone 3 - Weekend Occupancy Sample 48
Table 40: Zone 3 - Weekend Length of Stay 48
Table 41: Zone 3 Planned Projects 49
Table 42: Zone 3 Added Parking Demand 49
Table 43: Historical Annual Growth Data 50
Table 44: Zone 3 Annual Growth Scenarios (north of 16th Street) 51
Table 45: Projected Future Parking Adequacy 51
Table 46: Zone 4 Parking Inventory Detail 53
Table 47: Zone 4 Effective Parking Supply 54
Table 48: Zone 4 Occupancy Observations 55
Table 49: Zone 4 Parking Adequacy 59
Table 50: Zone 4 Parking Adequacy by Block 59
Table 51: Zone 4 - Weekday Occupancy Sample 61
Table 52: Zone 4 - Weekday Length of Stay 61
Table 53: Zone 4 - Weekend Occupancy Sample 62
Table 54: Zone 4 - Weekend Length of Stay 62
Table 55: Zone 4 Planned Projects 63
Table 56: Zone 4 Added Parking Demand 63
Table 57: Historical Annual Growth Data 64
Table 58: Zone 4 Annual Growth Scenarios 65
Table 59: Projected Future Parking Adequacy 65
Table 60: Zone 5 Parking Inventory Detail 67
Table 61: Zone 5 Effective Parking Supply 68
Table 62: Zone 5 Occupancy Observations 69
Table 63: Zone 5 Parking Adequacy 72
Table 64: Zone 5 Parking Adequacy by Block 72
Table 65: Zone 5 - Weekday Occupancy Sample 74
Table 66: Zone 5 - Weekday Length of Stay 74
Table 67: Zone 5 - Weekend Occupancy Sample 75
Table 68: Zone 5 - Weekend Length of Stay 75
Table 69: Zone 5 Planned Projects 76
Table 70: Zone 5 Added Parking Demand 77
Table 71: Historical Annual Growth Data 78
Table 72: Zone 5 Annual Growth Scenarios 78
Table 73: Projected Future Parking Adequacy 79
v
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Miami Beach ( "the City ") engaged Walker Parking Consultants ( "Walker ") to
conduct a parking supply and demand analysis for areas of South Miami Beach from Dade
Boulevard to South Pointe Drive. The purpose of the study is to quantify current and future
parking conditions based on various development scenarios to assist in the overall parking
management plan of the City. Data was collected during a weekday and Saturday and
included duration of stay observations.
The study area generally encompasses the area from Dade Boulevard to South Pointe Drive,
sub - divided into five Zones for analysis as outlined below:
• Zone 1 (Alton Road Corridor) - 5th Street to 17th Street and from West Avenue /Bay
Road to Lenox Avenue
• Zone 2 (Convention Center and Sunset Harbour) - 17th Street to 23rd Street /Dade
Boulevard and from Alton Road to Collins Avenue
• Zone 3 (Neighborhood Area) - 5th Street to 17th Street and from Lenox Avenue to
Pennsylvania /Drexel Avenue
• Zone 4 (Ocean Drive Corridor) - 5th Street to 10 17th Street and from
Pennsylvania /Drexel Avenue to Collin Avenue /Ocean Drive
• Zone 5 (South Pointe) - South Pointe Drive to 5th Street and from Alton Road to Ocean
Drive
Parking within each Zone was inventoried and classified as either on- street, off - street public, or
off - street private. The off - street public parking facilities were further classified as a City owned
and operated garages and lots; and garages and lots open to the general public that are not
owned by the City. Private parking consists of garages and Tots restricted for a particular use,
such as employee parking only, a specific business or condominium tower. Only patrons of
that particular venue are permitted to park in that parking facility. Each Zone is broken into
blocks for analysis, and the blocks within each zone are numbered to correspond with the
Zone number. The Zone numbering system used throughout the report is based on the
following numbering series:
• Zone 1: 100's
• Zone 2: 200's
• Zone 3: 300's
• Zone 4: 400's
• Zone 5: 500's
A map on the following page provides an overview of the study area and outlines the five
zones and block areas.
vi
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
tf-t 4,41
4, W lOr
2474 -
e£
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
kv.
VII
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING INVENTORY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
A total of 27,644 spaces were inventoried within the areas studied. The City provides roughly
60% of the public parking assets, with 28% provided on- street, 22% in City Garages, and 10% in
surface parking lots. Additional public parking is provided, predominantly in public parking
garages, by private owners.
Of the spaces surveyed, 25% is considered Private. Private parking includes areas restricted to
a particular business or for valet use, as well as areas observed by Walker and the inventory
data provided by the City for known areas restricted from observation by the general public.
The following table provides a summary of the parking inventory.
Summary of Parking Inventory
Off - Street
Zone #
Description
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public
Lot
Private
Total:
100
Alton Road
978
1,050
93
698
71
4,004
6,894
200
North of 17th
930
1,081
1,391
300
50
858
4,610
300
Residential
2,944
1,460
776
780
0
120
6,080
400
Ocean Drive
1,616
2,424
126
1,897
213
1,029
7,305
500
South Pointe
1,101
0
342
311
182
819
2,755
Totals:
7,569
6,015
2,728
3,986
516
6,830
27,644
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
OBSERVED CONDITIONS
Parking occupancy for weekday and weekend periods is summarized by type for each zone
in the following pages. Total occupancy is shown for each area. Parking occupancy above
85 - 90 percent is generally perceived as difficult to find or problematic. Even when overall
parking occupancy is below this level, within each of the zones there are several individual
blocks with occupancy greater than the 85 -90 percent threshold. These areas are identified in
maps located in the Appendix and full report using color codes.
viii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 100: Alton Road Corridor - Weekday
95%
3:00 PM
6:00 PM
92%
73%
89%
• On- Street Off - Street City • Off- Street Public • Off- Street Private
9:00 PM
80%
75%
54%
7:00 PM
91%
Zone 100: Alton Road Corridor - Saturday
75%
41%
91%
64%
71%
91%
29%
10:00 PM 1:00 AM
• On- Street Ai Off- Street City • Off - Street Public • Off - Street Private
ix
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
•WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 200: Convention Center and Sunset Harbour - Weekday
94% 96% 95%
83%
80% 80%
76%
71%
3:00 PM
82%
62%
58%
77%
6:00 PM
in On- Street Off- Street City ■ Off - Street Public • Off - Street Private
900 PM
68%
Zone 200: Convention Center and Sunset Harbour - Saturday
98%
65%
7:00 PM
79%
99%
68% 67%
78%
69%
66%
93%
10:00 PM 1:00 AM
• On- Street • Off - Street City • Off - Street Public • Off - Street Private
X
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 300: Residential Core - Weekday
86%
91%
74%
75%
28%
7:00 PM
• On- Street a Off- Street City a Off - Street Public ■ Off - Street Private
Zone 300: Residential Core - Saturday
12:00 PM
5:00 PM 10:00 PM
■ On- Street aI Off - Street City III Off - Street Public • Off- Street Private
xi
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
itaPARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 400: Ocean Drive Corridor - Weekday
100%
84%
87%
100% 100%
83%
61%
II 51%
44% 46%
39%
4:00 PM
8:00 PM
• On- Street Off- Street City • Off- Street Public • Off- Street Private
34%
12:00 AM
91%
4:00 PM
100%
Zone 400: Ocean Drive Corridor - Saturday
8896
37%
8:00 PM
100%
10096
91%
• On- Street Off - Street City • Off - Street Public • Off - Street Private
12:00 AM
xii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
85%
68%
83%
12:00 PM
Zone 500: South Pointe - Weekday
81%
6:00 PM
• On- Street Off- Street City ■ Off- Street Public • Off - Street Private
10:00 PM
74%
80%
54%
Zone 500: South Pointe - Saturday
58%
59%
84%
76%
48%
45%
12:00 PM
43%
6:00 PM
41%
• On- Street a Off- Street City • Off - Street Public • Off- Street Private
10:00 PM
73%
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
.410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
Future parking conditions are based on known projects within each zone combined with data
from the Current Economic Conditions report compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural
& Economic Development Department. Factors considered include annual hospitality sales;
average daily population statistics; hotel occupancy rate; jobs; building permits; and the food
and beverage tax receipts. The annual growth rates are calculated for each period using
data from 2006 - 2012. The following tables provide the annual growth rate assumptions and
projected future parking adequacy summary for each zone.
ZONE 1: ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR
The Alton Road Corridor is undergoing significant changes in roadway improvements and
relaxed zoning requirements to encourage redevelopment along portions of Alton Road.
Specifically, smaller redevelopment projects for retail and restaurant spaces do not require
providing off - street parking. Our analysis indicates single redevelopment projects can
generate small parking demand; however, if multiple sites are developed to the maximum
potential without required parking there is a concern for generating parking demand that
would spill into the adjacent residential areas. This is especially true for restaurant type land
uses which generate some of the largest peak parking demand.
Zone 1 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Scenario 1
Year EPS
2014 6,359
2015 6,359
2016 7,042
2017 7,042
2018 7,042
2019 7,042
2020 7,042
2021 7,042
2022 7,042
2023 7,042
Demand Adequacy
5,782 577
5,961 398
6,896 146
7,110 (68)
7,330 (288)
7,557 (515)
7,791 (749)
8,033 (991)
8,282 (1,240)
8,539 (1,497)
2,161)
2486)
,240)
(3,826)
12,236 (5,193}
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
xiv
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
ZONE 2: CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
Planning for renovations to the Miami Beach Convention Center continue and will have an
impact on future conditions within Zone 2. Our future conditions analysis includes the
preliminary changes to the convention center as well as several planned hotel additions, and
restaurants combined with three annual growth rate scenarios.
Zone 2 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year
EPS
Scenario 1
f t
fi
������
Demand
Adequacy
2014
4,147
3,871
276
2015
4,147
3,991
156
2016
5,543
5,172
371
'i'y i✓A
2017
5,543
5,332
211
2018
5,543
5,497
46
2019
5,543
5,667
(124)
G ���aM
��T :
����
`
yap
� �a „��5�^"'�”`
we8&i
•
� ,t
2020
5,543
5,843
(300)
$ A l �
, 4 ✓
a d w � d
4 a� � a
�w s\
2021
5,543
6,024
(481)
2022
5,543
6,211
(668)
,
rY•
2023
5,543
6,404
(861)
u;`��,
2024
5,543
6,603
(1,060)
�
14)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
xv
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
ZONE 3: RESIDENTIAL CORE
The residential core is challenged by being surrounded by high demand commercial uses and
spill over parking demand from employees and visitors. Future developments included in our
analysis are primarily for commercial uses along the edges of the study area. The residential
parking permit spaces that are not restricted during a portion of the weekday hours indicate
high demand from non - residents. This provides some relief during a portion of the weekday
and is a valued shared parking asset. Increasing the restricted hours is one option to benefit
residents; however, the non - resident demand will impact the surrounding areas negatively
and the added residential supply may not meet the demand when it is needed.
Zone 3 Annual Growth Scenarios (north of 16th Street)
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year
EPS
Scenario 1
��• 6 Ak'
"7� �Y
� �4
ouhY -aa'e.
��
< � �
}
54
„ (� ���r�zM t
�4 ��0 \Y ?LC ( 4. A x \
u..'u u w mcaYS..� ,sp .
^� , ism
�r
`�i
).74�
u
Demand
Adequacy
nor ,
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
5,336
5,336
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,297
5,056
5,136
5,389
5,305
5,393
5,484
5,577
5,674
5,774
5,876
280
200
(92)
(8)
(96)
(187)��2�w
(280)
(377)
(477),
(579)
5 2�
tit
T
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
xvi
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
ZONE 4: OCEAN DRIVE
The Ocean Drive Zone represents a busy commercial area with nightly entertainment,
restaurants, hotels, and visitors. Parking in this area is in high demand and is projected to
increase over time. Overall demand is projected to reach deficit levels under the lowest
annual growth scenario the earliest of any of the zones.
Zone 4 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year
EPS
2014 6,550
2015 6,550
2016 6,550
2017 6,550
2018 6,550
2019 6,550
2020 6,550
2021 6,550
2022 6,550
2023 6,550
Scenario 1
Demand Adequacy
6,456
6,656
7,113
7,334
7,561
7,795
8,037
8,286
8,543
8,808
94
(106)
(563)
(784)
(1,011)
(1,245)
(1,487)
(1,736)
(1,993)
(2,258)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
xvii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
ZONE 5: SOUTH POINTE
South Pointe is currently undergoing substantial new developments, including hotel, residential
and mixed -use developments. Several of these developments include some parking but the
parking may or may not be available to the general public. The focus of much of the
development and demand is to the south and near the beach where the City has some
surface parking assets.
Zone 5 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year EPS
Scenario 1
Demand Adequacy
2014 2,470
2015 2,470
2016 3,190
2017 3,190
2018 3,190
2019 3,190
2020 3,190
2021 3,190
2022 3,190
2023 3,190
2,267 203
2,337 133
2,856 334
2,945 245
3,036 154
3,130 60
3,227 (37)
3,327 (137)
3,430 (240)
3,536 (346)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
xviii
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE PARKING NEEDS SUMMARY
The analysis indicates parking capacity to be a growing issue in all five Zones under all growth
scenarios. While building new standalone parking structures to meet this demand is the most
direct solution, it is difficult given the high density of land uses and being surrounded by water
on three sides. Procuring parcels for the development of small surface lots is another option;
however, smaller lots add to the existing enforcement requirements and may not be efficient.
Partnering with a private developer to include building additional public parking spaces within
a new development is an option to increase public parking without building a standalone
parking facility. This option may also include allowing the improvement of a public parking
asset by a private developer with conditions that any existing parking be replaced and
expanded upon. These options should only be pursued where parking is in demand and
shown to be needed.
Other options to explore include possible expansion of existing facilities, acquiring privately
owned facilities in need of repair, and implementing parking management strategies to
distribute parking demand or reduce parking demand.
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Several parking management strategies are provided in the report, including:
• Expanding residential parking permit hours to 24 hours per day, seven days a week;
• Adding time limit restrictions to residential parking permit zones during periods when the
residential parking restrictions are not in effect, but allowing residential permit holders
exception to posted time limits;
• Providing enhanced wayfinding and signage to direct patrons to the parking, including
displaying the number of available spaces on the signage;
• Increased branding and promotion of public parking;
• Implementing dynamic pricing based on seasonality and occupancy surveys;
• Encouraging car sharing services geared toward residents; and
• Allowing limited car reservations to improve options and increase revenue.
xix
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AilfWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
INTRODUCTION
The City of Miami Beach ( "the City ") engaged Walker Parking Consultants ( "Walker ") to
conduct a parking supply and demand analysis for areas of South Miami Beach from Dade
Boulevard to South Pointe Drive. The purpose of the study is to quantify current and future
parking conditions based on various development scenarios to assist in the overall parking
management plan of the City. Walker had previously completed a large scale
supply /demand analysis in selected areas of Miami Beach in 2004. While the study areas are
not an exact match, several of the areas and neighborhoods overlap.
KEY OBJECTIVES
• Update the physical inventory of parking spaces within the study area;
• Gain an understanding of how Residential Parking Permit areas are utilized during non -
enforced hours;
• Analyze the impact of extending existing restricted residential parking zone hours; and
• Project future demand based on planned projects within the study area and potential
future growth.
STUDY AREAS
The complete study area generally encompasses the area from Dade Boulevard to the north
to South Pointe Drive to the south. This area is sub - divided into five Zones for analysis as
outlined below:
• Zone 1 (Alton Road Corridor) - 5th Street to 17th Street and from West Avenue /Bay
Road to Lenox Avenue
• Zone 2 (Convention Center and Sunset Harbour) - 17th Street to 23rd Street /Dade
Boulevard and from Alton Road to Collins Avenue
• Zone 3 (Neighborhood Area) - 5th Street to 17th Street and from Lenox Avenue to
Pennsylvania /Drexel Avenue
• Zone 4 (Ocean Drive Corridor) - 5th Street to 1 o 17th Street and from
Pennsylvania /Drexel Avenue to Collin Avenue /Ocean Drive
• Zone 5 (South Pointe) - South Pointe Drive to 5th Street and from Alton Road to Ocean
Drive
Each Zone is defined by uniquely numbered blocks for analysis and organization. The report
provides an overall summary and detailed analysis by Zone. The map on the following page
provides an overview of the study area and outlines the five zones and block areas.
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 1: Overall Study Area Map
1 rend
1 — -- Study Area / Zone Boundanes
1 oo Block Numbers
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SUMMARY OF INVENTORY
Parking within each Zone was inventoried and classified as either on- street, off - street public, or
off - street private. The off - street public parking facilities were further classified as a City owned
and operated garages and lots; and garages and lots open to the general public that are not
owned by the City. Private parking consists of garages and lots restricted for a particular use,
such as employee parking only, a specific business or condominium tower. Only patrons of
that particular venue are permitted to park in that parking facility. Each Zone is broken into
blocks for analysis, and the blocks within each zone are numbered to correspond with the
Zone number. The Zone numbering system used throughout this report is based on the
following numbering series:
• Zone 1: l00's
• Zone 2: 200's
• Zone 3: 300's
• Zone 4: 400's
• Zone 5: 500's
PARKING INVENTORY
A total of 27,644 spaces were inventoried within the areas studied.
The City provides roughly 60% of the public parking assets, with 28%
provided on- street, 22% in City Garages, and 10% in surface parking
Tots. Additional public parking is provided, predominantly in public
parking garages, by private owners.
Of the spaces surveyed, 25% is considered Private. Private parking
includes areas restricted to a particular business or for valet use, as
well as areas observed by Walker and the inventory data provided
by the City for known areas restricted from observation by the
general public. Table 1 depicts a summary of the total parking
inventory.
Public Parking
Public Lot_
3%
Table 1: Summary of Parking Inventory
Off - Street
Zone #
Description
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public
Lot
Priv ate
Total:
100
Alton Road
978
1,050
93
698
71
4,004
6,894
200
North of 17th
930
1,081
1,391
300
50
858
4,610
300
Residential
2,944
1,460
776
780
0
120
6,080
400
Ocean Drive
1,616
2,424
126
1,897
213
1,029
7,305
500
South Pointe
1,101
0
342
311
182
819
2,755
Totals:
7,569
6,015
2,728
3,986
516
6,830
27,644
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
3
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
OBSERVATION PERIODS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Observations of parked vehicles within each zone were recorded on a weekday and Saturday
at three different intervals over the course of a day. The observation periods were agreed
upon at the start of the project during a meeting with various City departments. Weekday
observations were conducted over a two day period, Wednesday November 6th- and
Thursday November 7th; while the Saturday counts were taken on November 9, 2013. The
actual observation times for each Zone are shown in the following Tables.
Table 2: Weekday Observation Times
Zone
100
200
300
400
500
Weekday
noon
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
12 AM
1AM
Source: Walker Parking Consultants and Miami Beach Parking
Table 3: Saturday Observation Times
Zone
100
200
300
400
500
Saturday
noon
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
10 PM
11 PM
12 AM
1AM
Source: Walker Parking Consultants and Miami Beach Parking
The report that follows herein delivers a detailed accounting of the findings within each Zone,
as well as the observed occupancy and adequacy of the available parking supply.
4
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Several terms used in this report have unique meanings when used in the parking industry. To
help clarify these terms and enhance understanding by the reader, definitions for some of
these terms are presented below.
• Demand - The number of parking spaces recommended to satisfy the visitor, employee
and resident demand on a given day.
• Demand Generator - Any building, structure, business, or attraction that brings
individuals into the study area, thereby increasing parking demand and occupancy.
• Effective Parking Supply (EPS) - The actual inventory adjusted to provide the optimum
number of parking spaces before parking is typically perceived as being insufficient.
This "cushion" in the parking inventory accounts for some spaces lost due vehicles
parked in two spaces, spaces lost for repair or temporary blockage and for the time
needed for patrons to locate the last few available spaces. The cushion also accounts
for the dynamics of vehicles moving in and out of spaces which can lead to "cruising"
for the last few open spaces.
• Effective Supply Factor (ESF) - The adjustment factor used to calculate the Effective
Parking Supply.
• Inventory - The total number of parking spaces identified and counted during survey
day observations. The intent of this study is to account for all parking within defined
geographical areas of study.
• Occupancy (Counts) - The number of vehicles observed parked on each survey day.
• Parking Adequacy - The difference between the effective parking supply and
demand.
• Private Parking - A parking space that is restricted from public access and reserved for
private use, regardless of ownership.
• Public Parking - A parking space that is available for use by the general public on an
hourly, daily and /or monthly basis.
• Survey Days - The days that the parking occupancy counts were conducted in the
study areas.
• Survey Times - The time of the survey on the Survey Day. The time generally represents
the start time of the data collection.
5
ZONE 1:
ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR
itg
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
INTRODUCTION
The Alton Road Corridor Zone resides along Alton Road from 5th
Street to 17th Street. Alton Road is a busy commercial area with
residential units moving outward to the east and west. Several
high rise condominiums with private gated parking areas are
located along the waterway. The gated areas are not
accessible to the general public for observation, but where
possible, the inventory of parking spaces is included in the
analysis based on City records. Occupancy of these areas is
assumed to be full.
The corridor is currently undergoing a major two -year roadway
construction project, which began in April 2013. The project
impacts the entire length of Alton Road within the study area and
eliminates about 90 on- street parking spaces. At the time of our
study, construction was underway; however, traffic was allowed
in both directions and some on- street parking was observed.
During subsequent visits, construction intensity had increased to
include road closures, one -way traffic, and multiple cross road
constrictions.
STUDY AREA
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 is bordered by 17th Street to the north, mid -block between Alton and Lenox to the east,
5th Street to the south, and the inner coastal waterway to the west. The area is broken down
into 46 individual blocks with a total of 6,894 spaces inventoried for analysis.
PARKING INVENTORY
A majority of the Zone 1 parking is Private residential parking restricted within gated areas. The
City provides on- street and public garage parking at the 5th and Alton Street garage within
Zone 1. The following table and chart detail the parking inventory observed in Zone 1.
Table 4: Zone 1 Parking Inventory Detail
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
978
1,050
93
698
71
4,004
6,894
City Lot
z%
Public
Garage
Public Lot10%
1%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
7
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
The inventory of parking within the study area is adjusted to allow for a cushion necessary for
vehicles moving in and out of spaces, reduce the time necessary to find the last few
remaining spaces when the parking supply is nearly full, spaces lost due to mis- parked
vehicles, temporary construction, and restricted spaces. To account for this cushion, the
parking inventory is adjusted to reflect the Effective Parking Supply ( "EPS "). We derive the EPS
by deducting this cushion from the total parking capacity.
A parking system operates at peak efficiency when parking occupancy is at 85 to 95 percent
of the supply. When occupancy exceeds this level patrons may experience delays and
frustration while searching for a space; moreover, the parking supply may be perceived as
inadequate, even though spaces are available within the parking system. As a result, we use
the effective supply when analyzing the adequacy of the parking system, rather than the total
supply or inventory of spaces. The following factors affect the efficiency of a parking system:
➢ Capacity - Large, scattered surface lots operate less efficiently than a more compact
facility, such as a double- threaded helix parking structure, which offers one -way traffic
that passes each available parking space one time. Moreover, it is difficult to find the
available spaces in a widespread parking area rather than in a centralized parking
area.
➢ Type of users - Monthly or regular parking patrons can find the available spaces more
efficiently than infrequent visitors because they are familiar with the location of the
parking options and typically know where the spaces will be available before they
park.
➢ On- street vs. Off - street - On- street parking is Tess efficient than off - street due to the time
it takes patrons to find the last few vacant on- street spaces. In addition, patrons are
typically limited to using one side of the street at a time and often must parallel park in
traffic to use an on- street space.
For this analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on- street
spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces and 95% for off - street private spaces. The Zone 1 EPS is
calculated at 6,359 spaces, as shown in the following table.
Table 5: Zone 1 Effective Parking Supply
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
8
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Inventory
ESF
978
0.85
1,050
0.90
93
0.90
698
0.90
71
0.90
4,004
0.95
6,894
Effective Supply*
834
945
84
628
64
3,804
6,359
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
8
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
CURRENT CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 1 5- 1988.00
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday of all inventoried
parking spaces within this Zone. Weekday observations were conducted on Wednesday,
November 6th and the Saturday observations were made on November 9th. Weather
conditions during the Weekday observations were good; Saturday observations experienced
intermittent rain during the day and rain in the evening.
The following table provides a summary of the observations for both periods with the overall
peak observation period identified for both periods.
Table 6: Zone 1 Occupancy Observations
On -Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off-Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
978
PEAK
HOU R
679
69%
299
1,050 478
46%
572
93 69
74%
24
698 407
58%
291
71 56
79%
15
4,004 3,797
95%
207
6,894 5,486
80%
1,408
784 711
80% 73%
194 267
481 417
46% 40%
569 633
79 82
85% 88%
14 11
445 308
64% 44%
253 390
29 33
41% 46%
42 38
3,665 3,553
92% 89%
339 451
5,483 5,104
80% 74%
1,411 1,790
On -Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off -Sheet Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
978 732 732 692
75% 75% 71%
246 246 286
1,050 544 410 300
52% 39% 29%
506 640 750
93 73 60 29
78% 65% 31%
20 33 64
698 580 476 149
83% 68% 21%
118 222 549
71 33 17 3
46% 24% 4%
38 54 68
4,004 3,646 3,654 3,654
91% 91% 91%
358 350 350
6,894 5,608 5,349 4,827
81% 78% 70%
1,286 1,545 2,067
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
9
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING OCCUPANCY DETAIL
The overall peak observed occupancy level of 81% does not in itself indicate a shortage of
parking. However, when we look at the individual blocks that comprise the study area, we
note that several blocks experience occupancy levels that could indicate an issue with the
available supply.
To illustrate parking occupancy in detail, heat maps were developed to depict the peak
parking demand observed on the Weekday and Saturday. Generally, the highest parking
demand was observed north of 14th Street and along the waterway, where several blocks
were observed with occupancy greater than 85 %. A majority of the parking west of West
Avenue is Private parking, restricted for use by condominium and high rise apartment owners.
These areas are assumed to be full whenever direct observation was not possible.
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor 10
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 2: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
Zone 1 - Occupancy Weekday 3pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
—r
tto
oA
ligne q '
1 iim4Kf �a
el 45ALwo
tt
L._
■
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 3: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
— Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
12
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Parking adequacy is defined as the ability of the parking supply to accommodate the
demand. The parking demand can vary throughout the year due to seasonality, weather,
and local events. For comparison purposes, our analysis considers the observed peak
conditions as representative of the parking demand for the area. The observed demand is
subtracted from the effective parking supply to provide our opinion of the parking adequacy
within the area.
Considering Zone 1 as a whole, the following table shows the overall parking adequacy
(surplus or deficit) of parking spaces within the zone.
Table 7: Zone 1 Parking Adequacy
Adequacy
102
401
11
48
31
158
751
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
While overall adequacy in Zone 1 is a surplus, there are blocks with adequacy concerns. To
illustrate this, the following pages show parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 8: Zone 1 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
834
732
945
544
84
73
628
580
64
33
3,804
3,646
6,359
5,608
Adequacy
102
401
11
48
31
158
751
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
While overall adequacy in Zone 1 is a surplus, there are blocks with adequacy concerns. To
illustrate this, the following pages show parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 8: Zone 1 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off- Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
101
0
544
544
947
403
102
4
17
21
69
48
103
9
56
65
72
7
104
13
13
19
6
105
6
8
14
49
35
106
9
4
13
54
41
107
13
13
19
6
108
13
13
12
(1)
109
5
5
11
6
110
3
22
25
77
52
(continued on next page)
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
13
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
igiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off- Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
111
20
40
60
99
39
112
11
298
309
285
(24)
113
12
240
252
270
18
114
32
41
33
106
150
44
115
31
32
6
69
70
1
116
30
30
26
(4)
117
26
26
26
0
118
23
15
38
72
34
119
29
29
26
(3)
120
32
32
33
1
121
25
25
21
(4)
122
24
24
25
1
123
18
48
66
97
31
124
24
42
66
127
61
125
30
44
74
78
4
126
30
2
32
133
101
127
1
1
0
(1)
128
3
278
281
267
(14)
129
0
525
525
499
(26)
130
0
521
521
495
(26)
131
17
273
290
276
(14)
132
0
196
196
186
(10)
133
0
130
130
143
13
134
11
600
611
584
(27)
135
7
7
13
6
136
7
7
6
(1)
137
8
8
16
8
138
32
32
29
(3)
139
21
21
21
0
140
28
28
23
(5)
141
29
29
30
1
142
16
16
18
2
143
8
8
7
(1)
144
27
27
24
(3)
145
14
14
12
(2)
146
31
861
892
843
(49)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
14
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Walker conducted a parking turnover analysis using a sample of parking spaces within the
Zone. Spaces were observed on an hourly basis over the course of a day, and each space
was noted as being empty or with a portion of parked vehicle's license plate number on a
weekday (Friday, November 8, 2013) and a weekend (Sunday, November 10, 2013). The data
allows the average length of stay to be calculated as well as the parking utilization of the
sample. The tables below summarize the specific samples for the weekday and weekend
observations for Zone 1.
Table 9: Zone 1 - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
12:00 PM
100
West
l l th
9
9 9
9
8
8
9
9
8
9
100
MB 23
Lot
6
6 6
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
100
Pay Lot
16th
11
9 11
10
9
9
7
9
7
11
Totals: 26
% Occupied:
24 26 25 23 23 21 23 21 26
92% 100% 96% 88% 88% 81% 88% 81% 100%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 10: Zone 1 - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
100
West
1 1 th
9
10
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
3.3
100
MB 23
Lot
6
7
4
2
1
1
0
0
2
2.7
100
Pay Lot
16th
11
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.7
Total Vehicles: 26 56 6 3 2 2 2 1 9
Total Hours:
56 12 9 8 10 12 7 72
2.30
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
15
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AilWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 11: Zone 1 - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
5:00 PM
100
Alton
17th
17
14 16
15
15
15
15
14
15
15
100
Lincoln Road
Alton
7
7 7
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
100
West
15th Terrace
8
6 6
7
7
6
6
8
8
6
Totals: 32 27
% Occupied:
29 28 29 28 28 29 30 30
84% 91% 88% 91% 88% 88% 91% 94% 94%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 12: Zone 1 - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
100 Alton
17th
17
36
14
8
2
0
0
1
2
1.9
100 Lincoln Road
Alton
7
14
6
6
1
0
0
1
0
2.0
100 West
15th Terrace
8
4
3
0
0
1
0
1
4
4.2
Total Vehicles: 32 54 23 14 3 1 0 3 6
Total Hours:
54 46 42 12 5 0 21 48
2.19
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor 16
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AigiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
The basis for projecting short -term future parking conditions can be based on adding planned
developments specific to an area. Known or planned developments consist of projects
registered with the Miami Beach Planning Department that include details on the planned
type and size of the land use, as well as the planned parking inventory for the development.
Projecting beyond two to three years, or when there is limited data on planned projects, we
typically assess future conditions based on historical growth rates of criteria that directly
influence area activity and parking demand, which can provide a good measure of potential
changes to the future parking conditions.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The Miami Beach Planning Department provided the two projects detailed in the following
table for consideration within Zone 1, and we assume these developments will be completed
and impact parking demand within the next three years for this analysis. The list of proposed
improvements may not represent all potential real estate projects or business expansions being
considered; only those projects in the planning process at the time of our study.
Table 13: Zone 1 Planned Projects
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Residential
(Units)
Retail
(SF)
Restaurant
(Seats)
Parking
Spaces
127
Alton Road
Mixed -Use
444
60,100
759
130
West Avenue
Restaurant
300
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Parking demand for each project is based on parking demand generation research by the
Urban Land Use ( "ULI "), Institute of Transportation Engineers ( "ITE "), and Walker. The base
parking demand is adjusted by a "non- captive" factor, drive ratio adjustment, and time of
day based on the overall observed peak parking demand.
The non - captive adjustment accounts for demand to the development that is already in the
area and parked for another and use demand generator. The drive ratio adjustment reflects
patrons that arrive to the site via other than a private vehicle. This includes car - pooling, taxi,
and walking. The time of day reflects typical activity for a land use during the peak observed
conditions.
Based on the land uses in Zone 1, the planned developments are projected to generate
additional demand of 750 spaces in the peak -hour. The following table provides a summary
of how this figure was derived, moving from top to bottom.
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
17
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 14: Zone 1 Added Parking Demand
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Residential
(Units)
Retail
(SF)
Restaurant
(Seats)
127
Alton Road
Mixed -Use
444
60,100
130
West Avenue
Restaurant
300
Total Added Land Use:
Base Demand Ratio
Ti
r o Non - Ca ptive ratio
E Drive Ratio
Time of Day
444 60,100 300
Added Demand
Total Demand:
622
750
92
36
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
The development in Block 127 is planned to include a parking structure with 759 spaces. This
added parking supply equates to an added effective supply of 683 spaces, assuming an
effective supply factor of 0.90; therefore, no inventoried spaces will be displaced for the
planned developments.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for Zone 1. The basis of the data is the Current Economic Conditions report
compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development Department.
Factors considered include annual hospitality sales; average daily population statistics; hotel
occupancy rate; jobs; building permits; and the food and beverage tax receipts. The annual
growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012 as shown in the following
table. The criteria for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the number
of building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are estimated to decrease slightly.
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor 18
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AilWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 15: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods
6 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria '06 -'12 '07 -'12 '08-'12 '09 -'12 '10-'12 '11-'12
Hotel Room Sales 5.43% 3.71% 4.90% 12.54% 12.09% 20.61%
m Food Sales 3.37% 4.12% 4.52% 7.50% 8.04% 8.07%
c°n Alcohol Sales 3.72% 3.25% 6.20% 9.50% 9.13% 17.08%
Hospitality Sales 4.28% 3.74% 5.06% 9.97% 9.93% 15.10%
Average Daily Population 3.74% 4.34% 5.68% 4.87% 5.24% 10.06%
Hotel Occupancy 1.11% 0.62% 1.06% 5.13% 5.27% 0.17%
Jobs 2.26% 3.35% 3.94% 3.35% 3.45% 3.98%
Building Permits 0.51% - 0.19% 3.33% 6.88% 11.12% 12.73%
Food and Beverage Tax 7.04% 6.94% 8.71% 10.00% 8.71% 5.33%
Average Annual Growth 3.16% 3.13% 4.63% 6.70% 7.29% 7.90%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data shown in the previous table and our understanding of the
potential for development within the Alton Road Corridor, three annual growth scenarios were
developed to project the overall change in the parking demand. The annual growth rate
percentage scenarios are shown below.
Table 16: Zone 1 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor 19
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The projected parking adequacy over the next ten years is shown below for each of the three
annual growth rate scenarios. The projections shown assume that in year three the planned
developments are completed, and changes to the parking supply are implemented.
Table 17: Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year EPS
Scenario 1
Demand Adequacy
2014 6,359
2015 6,359
2016 7,042
2017 7,042
2018 7,042
2019 7,042
2020 7,042
2021 7,042
2022 7,042
2023 7,042
5,782 577
5,961 398
6,896 146
7,110 (68)
7,330 (288)
7,557 (515)
7,791 (749)
8,033 (991)
8,282 (1,240)
8,539 (1,497)
4
6,266 93
7,373 (331 )
7,793 (751)
8,237 (1,195)
8,707 (1,665)
9,203 (2,161)
9,728 (2,686)
10,282 (3,240)
10,868 (3,826)
9,
,988 (2,946)
0,687 (3,645)
11,435 (4.393)
12,235 (5,193)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
The three scenario's represent equally distributed annual growth across the Zone with the
addition of the known planned developments in the third year (2016). Parking is projected to
reach a short fall at some point in all three scenarios within four years. Under the highest
annual growth projection overall parking is projected to be inadequate in one year. Walker's
analysis includes only the known developments detailed herein and assumes 100% occupancy
of the private restricted parking areas that were not available for occupancy counts.
ALTON ROAD PARKING DISTRICT
The Alton Road Parking District was established along Alton Road from 5th Street on the south
to Dade Boulevard on the north, excluding portions along Flamingo Park and Lincoln Road.
The ordinance, as outlined in Section 130 -33 Off - street parking requirements, reduces or
eliminates required off - street parking for certain developments to encourage redevelopment
along the Alton Road corridor. The impact of the reduced requirements, combined with the
on -going Alton Road redevelopment and resulting reduction of 90± on- street parking spaces,
has the potential of adding to the future parking needs within this area.
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
20
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
NO PARKING REQUIRED
Individual retail, food, or personal service establishments of 2,500 square feet or less, up to a
total aggregate of 10,000 square feet per development site do not require providing off - street
parking. A single development with 2,500 square feet of retail space is projected to generate
demand of less than 8 spaces during the peak hour of the peak month, which alone does not
represent significant impact to the area.
Assuming a new retail development site with establishments of 2,500 square feet or less with a
total aggregate at or near the maximum (10,000 sf), the peak parking demand per the Urban
Land Institute, (adjusted to the Miami Beach area) is roughly 30 spaces during the projected
peak hour. Of these spaces, about 5 would be for employees, assuming an employee drive to
work reduction. This assumes a full build out scenario to the maximum 10,000 sf aggregate site.
This type of development, assuming no additional parking is provided could generate parking
issues within the surrounding residential areas if no public parking is available on- street to off-
set the demand.
Individual restaurants, outdoor cafes, or bars with Tess than 60 seats or smaller than 1,500
square feet, up to a total aggregate of 5,000 square feet per development do not require
providing off - street parking. Parking demand for these types of land uses are much higher
and based on the Gross Leasable Area. Based on 1,500 square feet, the peak hour
unadjusted demand could be as high as 30 spaces, which including employee parking.
Considering an aggregate site with a total of 5,000 square feet, the total peak hour demand
could reach close to 100 spaces, which would represent a significant parking issue for the
surrounding area. This is especially true as these types of land uses typically peak in the
evenings when the surrounding area is restricted to residential parking permit holders.
Our opinion of the overall impact of the lower Alton Road parking requirements to encourage
smaller developments is that it depends on each specific development. If multiple
development sites are built to the maximum available land use size parking is likely to be a
serious concern. If smaller developments are added it is less likely to be a concern, but should
be monitored. Employee parking at any new establishment will be a factor and should be
considered by the developer /business owner. Additional on- street metered parking may be
required at some point in the future based on the specific developments that take advantage
of the lower parking requirements.
Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor 21
ZONE 2:
CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
INTRODUCTION
Zone 2 generally includes the area between 17th Street and Dade
Boulevard. This area includes the Miami Beach Convention
Center and Sunset Harbour development area as well as
residential areas, museums, and hotels. The portion of the area
between Alton Road and Meridian Avenue excluded from the
study consist of single family residential homes with no public
parking. Drive - through observations confirmed this parking
restriction and the lack of parking areas beyond private residents.
During the observations the convention center parking areas
were closed for the annual auto show. This included the main
surface parking lot, surrounding on- street parking areas, and the
Holocaust Memorial parking lot. The closed areas were counted
as full, as the spaces were unavailable for use.
STUDY AREA
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 2 is generally bordered by 23rd Street to the north, the beach to the east, 17th Street to
the south, and the inner coastal waterway to the west. The area is broken down into 34
individual blocks for analysis, with a total of 4,610± spaces inventoried for analyses.
PARKING INVENTORY
A majority of the Zone 2 parking is provided by the City, via off - street and on- street parking
assets. The following table and chart detail the Zone 2 parking inventory.
Table 18: Zone 2 Parking Inventory Detail
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
930
1,081
1,391
300
50
858
4,610
Public Lot Private
1% 19%
Public
Garage
7%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
23
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
For the Zone 2 analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on-
street spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces and 95% for off - street private spaces. The EPS
for this zone is calculated to be 4,147 spaces as shown in the following table.
Table 19: Zone 2 Effective Parking Supply
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 24
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Inventory
ESF
930
0.85
1,081
0.90
1,391
0.90
300
0.90
50
0.90
858
0.95
4,610
Effective Supply*
791
973
1,252
270
45
816
4,147
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 24
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
CURRENT CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday of all inventoried
parking spaces within the Zone. Weekday observations were conducted on Wednesday,
November 6th, and Saturday observations were made on November 9th. Weather conditions
during the Weekday observations were good; Saturday observations experienced intermittent
rain during the day and rain in the evening.
The following table provides a summary of the observations for both periods with the overall
peak observation period identified for both periods.
Table 20: Zone 2 Occupancy Observations
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off -Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
930
PEAK
HOUR
770
83%
160
1,081 685
63%
396
1,391
1,284
92%
107
300 300
100%
0
50 30
60%
20
858 686
80%
172
4,610
3,755
81%
855
711 580
76% 62%
219 350
505 301
47% 28%
576 780
1,245 1,128
90% 81%
146 263
300 300
100% 100%
0 0
36 32
72% 64%
14 18
706 660
82% 77%
152 198
3,503 3,001
76% 65%
1,107 1,609
On -Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off -Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
930 637 629 638
68% 68% 69%
293 301 292
1,081 344 367 255
32% 34% 24%
737 714 826
1,391 1,263 1,293 1,387
91% 93% 100%
128 98 4
300 300 300 300
100% 100% 100%
0 0 0
50 43 48 26
86% 96% 52%
7 2 24
858 676 671 586
79% 78% 68%
182 187 272
4,610 3,263 3,308 3,192
71% 72% 69%
1,347 1,302 1,418
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
25
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING OCCUPANCY DETAIL
The overall peak observed occupancy level of 81% indicates high parking demand. Part of
the reason for the high occupancy is the Convention Center Tots that were closed for annual
car show and counted as full. In addition, the valet garage located in block 223 was
inaccessible for actual counts and counted as full. If we assume this level of occupancy, the
parking demand is consistently high for all types. To illustrate parking occupancy on a block -
by -block basis, the following heat maps were developed to show the Weekday and Saturday
peak parking observed occupancy. Generally, the highest parking demand was observed
north of 14th Street with several blocks observed with occupancy greater than 85 %.
The area between the Sunset Harbour and the Convention Center is primarily single family
homes with no public parking. This area has no significant impact on publicly available
parking.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 26
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 4: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
Zone 2 - Occupancy Weekday 3pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy s69%
I
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
27
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 5: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Zone 2 - Occupancy Saturday lOpm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
NMI II=
000
I
I
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
28
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
.44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Parking adequacy is the ability of the parking supply to accommodate the demand, which
may vary throughout the year due to seasonality, weather, and local events. For comparison
purposes, our analysis considers the observed peak conditions as representative of the parking
demand for Zone 2. The observed parking demand is subtracted from the effective supply to
provide our opinion on the parking adequacy. Considering Zone 2 as a whole, the following
table shows the overall parking adequacy for this area.
Table 21: Zone 2 Parking Adequacy
Adequacy
21
288
(32)
(30)
15
130
392
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
While the overall adequacy of the entire Zone represents a surplus, there are blocks with
adequacy concerns. To illustrate this fact, the following page provides a table showing the
parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 29
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
791
770
973
685
1,252
1,284
270
300
45
30
816
686
4,147
3,755
Adequacy
21
288
(32)
(30)
15
130
392
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
While the overall adequacy of the entire Zone represents a surplus, there are blocks with
adequacy concerns. To illustrate this fact, the following page provides a table showing the
parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 29
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 22: Zone 2 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Demand
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
201
13
13
14
1
202
8
24
32
55
23
203
14
14
14
0
204
18
18
23
5
205
14
14
17
3
206
8
508
516
593
77
207
21
109
130
162
32
208
19
19
18
(1)
209
22
22
20
(2)
210
37
37
31
(6)
211
20
20
16
(4)
212
30
30
33
3
213
33
33
29
(4)
214
7
7
7
0
215
29
886
915
825
(90)
216
30
30
43
13
217
35
156
191
342
151
218
35
26
61
53
(8)
219
41
41
33
(8)
220
36
36
29
(7)
221
19
19
18
(1)
222
8
8
5
(3)
223
20
300
320
291
(29)
224
27
27
26
(1)
225
30
30
34
4
226
48
48
48
0
227
30
14
44
60
16
228
22
172
194
204
10
229
3
530
533
507
(26)
230
21
20
41
41
0
231
20
33
30
83
105
22
232
6
6
14
8
233
43
177
220
434
214
234
3
3
3
0
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
30
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
.40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Spaces were observed on an hourly basis over the course of a day and each space was
noted as being empty or parked (license plate number recorded) on a weekday (Friday,
November 8, 2013) and weekend day (Sunday, November 10, 2013). This data is used to
calculate the average length of stay as well as the parking utilization for the sample area. The
tables below summarize Walker's samples based upon the weekday and weekend
observations for Zone 2.
Table 23: Zone 2 - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
12:00 PM
200
Purday
18th
9
7 9
9
6
7
6
4
6
9
200
21st
Washington
9
9 9
9
8
8
8
6
5
9
200
MB 49
lot
18
16 18
18
18
18
18
14
4
18
200
James
19th
7
7 7
6
6
7
7
5
5
6
Totals:
% Occupied:
43 39 43 42 38 40 39 29 20 43
91% 100% 98% 88% 93% 91% 67% 47% 100%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 24: Zone 2 - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
200
Purday
18th
9
19
5
4
0
0
1
1
0
1.8
200
21st
Washington
9
6
4
2
0
4
1
0
2
3.3
200
MB 49
Lot
18
9
4
1
2
3
4
7
1
4.0
200
James
19th
7
2
1
3
1
1
2
0
2
4.2
Total Vehicles: 43 36 14 10 3 8 8 8 5
Total Hours:
36 28 30 12 40 48 56 40
3.15
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
31
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 25: Zone 2 - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
10:00 AM 1 1:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
12:00 PM
200
21st Street
Park Ave
17
1 1 13
13
1 1
1 1
9
10
9
11
200
Collins Park
South
18
16 17
17
18
18
17
17
12
18
200
Bay
21st
14
13 11
13
14
13
13
12
12
13
Totals: 49 40
% Occupied:
41 43 43 42 39 39 33 43
82% 84% 88% 88% 86% 80% 80% 67% 88%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 26: Zone 2 - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
200 21st Street
Park Ave
17
13
1
2
3
2
2
0
4
3.2
200 Colins Park
South
18
13
15
4
6
1
1
2
3
2.9
200 Bay
21st
14
35
16
2
3
2
1
0
0
1.7
Total Vehicles: 49 61 32 8 12 5 4 2 7
Total Hours:
61 64 24 48 25 24 14 56
2.41
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 32
SOUTH BEACH WALKER
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
PARKING DEMAND
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING CCNJSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
FUTURE CONDITIONS
The basis for projecting short -term future parking conditions for Zone 2 is the same
methodology used to project future conditions for Zone 1.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The City is currently in the planning phase of a major renovation and expansion of the Miami
Beach Convention Center ( "MBCC "). Preliminary plans include a new 60,000± square feet
ballroom, new parking, and a potential new hotel. Development options have been provided
to the City for consideration. For planning purposes our model assumes the addition of an 800
room hotel, 900 space parking facility and 60,000 sf of ballroom convention space.
The Miami Beach Planning Department provided additional projects within Zone 2 for
consideration. For this analysis, we assume the developments shown in the table below will be
completed and impact parking demand within the next three years. The list shown below
may not represent all potential real estate projects or business expansions being considered;
only those currently in the planning process in addition to the MBCC.
Table 27: Zone 2 Planned Projects
ZONE
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Residential
(Units)
Hotel
(Rooms)
Ballroom
(SF)
Retail
(SF)
Restaurant
(Seats)
Parking
Spaces
200
214
Convention Center Drive
MBCC Expansion
800
60,000
900
200
201
17 Street
Hotel /Restaurant
116
58
66
200
210
Collins Avenue
Hotel Addition
22
200
210
Collins Avenue
Hotel Addition
54
200
216
20th Street
Mixed -Use
50
11,325
153
200
216
Alton Road
Restaurant
222
200
221
Collins Avenue
Restaurant
515
200
221
Collins Avenue
Hotel Addition
22
200
224
21 Street
Hotel Addition
9
200
225
Park Avenue
Hotel
305
200
231
23rd Street
Reta i I /Parking Ga rage
17,500
489
200
232
Park Avenue
Hotel Addition
10
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 — Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
33
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The Zone 2 planned developments are projected to generate an additional demand of 448
spaces during the peak -hour. The following table provides a summary of how this figure was
derived, moving from top to bottom.
Table 28: Zone 2 Added Parking Demand
Total Added Land Use:
• Base Demand Ratio
o Non -Ca ptive RatlQ
a, co ▪ Drive Ratib
0
Time of Day
50
1,338
1.75 1.00
140 1.00
0.80 0,80`
0.70 0.70
60,000 28,825
6.00
0.70
0.80
0.80 0.90
4
795
Added Demand
49 749
Total Demand: 1,057
161
50
48
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
The planned developments are scheduled to include 1,608 new parking spaces located in
three parking structures and a surface parking lot. Construction is assumed to displace 51
spaces based on the reviewed development plans. Thus, the net increase in parking is 1,557
spaces. New parking spaces are adjusted to account for the effective supply factor of 0.90,
which provides an added effective parking supply of 1,396 spaces.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for Zone 2. The basis of the data is the Current Economic Conditions report
compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development Department.
Factors considered include annual hospitality sales; average daily population statistics; hotel
occupancy rate; jobs; building permits; and the food and beverage tax receipts. The annual
growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012 as shown in the following
table. All criteria for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the number of
building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are calculated with a slight decrease for that period.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 34
Res i denti a I
Hotel
Ba I I room
Reta i I
Restaurant
Description
(Units)
(Rooms)
(SF)
(SF)
(Seats)
Total Added Land Use:
• Base Demand Ratio
o Non -Ca ptive RatlQ
a, co ▪ Drive Ratib
0
Time of Day
50
1,338
1.75 1.00
140 1.00
0.80 0,80`
0.70 0.70
60,000 28,825
6.00
0.70
0.80
0.80 0.90
4
795
Added Demand
49 749
Total Demand: 1,057
161
50
48
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
The planned developments are scheduled to include 1,608 new parking spaces located in
three parking structures and a surface parking lot. Construction is assumed to displace 51
spaces based on the reviewed development plans. Thus, the net increase in parking is 1,557
spaces. New parking spaces are adjusted to account for the effective supply factor of 0.90,
which provides an added effective parking supply of 1,396 spaces.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for Zone 2. The basis of the data is the Current Economic Conditions report
compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic Development Department.
Factors considered include annual hospitality sales; average daily population statistics; hotel
occupancy rate; jobs; building permits; and the food and beverage tax receipts. The annual
growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012 as shown in the following
table. All criteria for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the number of
building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are calculated with a slight decrease for that period.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 34
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
vi,
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 29: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods
6 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria '06 -'12 '07-'12 '08-'12 '09 -'12 '10'12 '11 -'12
Hotel Room Sales 5.43% 3.71% 4.90% 12.54% 12.09% 20.61%
m Food Sales 3.37% 4.12% 4.52% 7.50% 8.04% 8.07%
u) Alcohol Sales 3.72% 3.25% 6.20% 9.50% 9.13% 17.08%
Hospitality Sales 4.28% 3.74% 5.06% 9.97% 9.93% 15.10%
Average Daily Population 3.74% 4.34% 5.68% 4.87% 5.24% 10.06%
Hotel Occupancy 1.11% 0.62% 1.06% 5.13% 5.27% 0.17%
Jobs 2.26% 3.35% 3.94% 3.35% 3.45% 3.98%
Building Permits 0.51% -0.19% 3.33% 6.88% 11.12% 12.73%
Food and Beverage Tax 7.04% 6.94% 8.71% 10.00% 8.71% 5.33%
Average Annual Growth 3.16% 3.13% 4.63% 6.70% 7.29% 7.90%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data shown above and our understanding of the potential
development within the zone, three annual growth scenarios were developed to project
overall changes to the parking demand in the short -term. The annual growth scenarios are
shown in the following table.
Table 30: Zone 2 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour 35
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4 PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The projected parking adequacy over the next ten years is shown for each of the three annual
growth rate scenarios, which assume that in year three the planned developments are
completed and the scheduled changes to the parking supply are implemented.
Table 31: Projected Future Parking Adequacy
2014 4,147 3,871 276
2015 4,147 3,991 156
2016 5,543 5,172 371
2017 5,543 5,332 211
2018 5,543 5,497 46
2019 5,543 5,667 (124)
2020 5,543 5,843 (300)
2021 5,543 6,024 (481)
2022 5,543 6,211 (668)
2023 5,543 6,404 (861)
2024 5,543
6,603 (1,060)
(942)
,312)
,703)
(2,116)
(2,553)
(3,014)
2,946,
3,540)
(4,176;
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
The three scenarios assume equally distributed annual growth across the zone with the
addition of the known planned developments factored into the third year (2016). Given these
assumptions, parking is projected to reach a deficit level under all three options within five
years. Under Scenario 2 and 3, overall parking is projected to be inadequate after one year;
moreover, Walker's analysis only includes those known developments detailed in this report
and also assumes 100% occupancy of the private restricted parking areas that were not
available for occupancy counts.
Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
36
ZONE 3:
RESIDENTIAL CORE BETWEEN 5TH AND 17TH STREETS
• PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4WiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
INTRODUCTION
Zone 3 is the primarily the residential core in the center of South
Beach. The northern portion of the Zone is home to the
renowned Lincoln Road Mall. The center area of the Zone
contains Flamingo Park, which includes green space, ball fields,
and tennis courts, while the southern end transitions back to
commercial land uses. The predominant land use is a mix of
residential, with single family homes and apartments.
Public on- street parking is available throughout the Zone as on-
street parking, Residential Permit Zone 2. Permit restrictions are
enforced from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Monday- Friday and 24 hours
Saturday- Sunday and Holidays. Observations indicate that
occupancy during the non - restricted time periods is slightly lower
than during the restricted time periods, with 82% occupancy
observed on- street on a weekday at 4:00 PM, compared to the
peak weekday observation of 91% at 10:00 PM.
STUDY AREA
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 3 is bordered by 17th Street to the north, Pennsylvania Street to the east, 5th Street to the
south, and from the alley between Alton Road and Lenox Avenue to the west. The area is
broken down into 69 individual blocks for analysis, with a total of 6,080± spaces inventoried
and observed in our analysis.
PARKING INVENTORY
Roughly half of the available parking within Zone 3 is on- street parking, as shown in the
following table and chart which details the parking inventory for Zone 3.
Table 32: Zone 3 Parking Inventory Detail
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
2,944
1,460
776
780
0
120
6,080
Public
Garage
13%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
38
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
443 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
For the Zone 3 analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on-
street spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces, and 95% for off - street private spaces. The EPS
for Zone 3 is calculated at 5,336 spaces, as shown in the following table.
Table 33: Zone 3 Effective Parking Supply
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 39
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Inventory
ESF
2,944
0.85
1,460
0.90
776
0.90
780
0.90
0
0.90
120
0.95
6,080
Effective Supply*
2,507
1,314
699
702
0
114
5,336
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 39
SOUTH BEACH WALKER
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
CURRENT CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday of the
inventoried parking spaces within this Zone. Weekday observations were conducted on
Thursday, November 7th, and the Saturday observations were made on November 9th.
Weather conditions during the Weekday observations were good; Saturday observations
experienced intermittent rain during the day and rain in the evening. The following table
provides a summary of both observation periods with the overall peak observation period
identified in each table.
Table 34: Zone 3 Occupancy Observations
PEAK
HOUR
0 PM ' :00PM 0:00 PM ATURDA
PEAK HOUR
On- Street 2,944 2,406 2,533 2,682 On- Street 2,944 2,512 2,504 2,599
Occupancy Rate 82% 86% 91% Occupancy Rate 85% 85% 88%
Unoccupied Spaces 538 411 262 Unoccupied Spaces 432 440 345
Public City Garage 1,460 1,336 957 894 Public City Garage 1,460 1,460 1,460 1,349
Occupancy Rate 92% 66% 61% Occupancy Rate 100% 100% 92%
Unoccupied Spaces 124 503 566 Unoccupied Spaces 0 0 111
Public City Lot 776 649 705 240 Public Cily Lot 776 657 590 448
Occupancy Rate 84% 91% 31% Occupancy Rate 85% 76% 58%
Unoccupied Spaces 127 71 536 Unoccupied Spaces 119 186 328
Public Garage 780 295 220 128 Public Garage 780 274 283 236
Occupancy Rate 38% 28% 16% Occupancy Rate 35% 36% 30%
Unoccupied Spaces 485 560 652 Unoccupied Spaces 506 497 544
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
0
O 0 0 Public Lot
- - - Occupancy Rate
O 0 0 Unoccupied Spaces
0
O 0 0
O 0 0
Of- Street Private 120 85 90 90 Off- Street Private 120 75 85 75
Occupancy Rate 71% 75% 75% Occupancy Rate 63% 71% 63%
Unoccupied Spaces 35 30 30 Unoccupied Spaces 45 35 45
Total 6,080 4,771 4,505 4,034 Total 6,080 4,978 4,922 4,707
Occupancy Rate 78% 74% 66% Occupancy Rate 82% 81% 77%
Unoccupied Spaces 1,309 1,575 2,046 Unoccupied Spaces 1,102 1,158 1,373
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 40
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
414 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING OCCUPANCY DETAIL
The peak observed occupancy level (82 %) on Saturday at 12:00 PM is high. Occupancy
remained fairly consistent, with the weather likely impacting demand for the later Saturday
counts. The heat maps illustrate parking occupancy on a block -by -block basis for both the
Weekday and Saturday observation periods. Several blocks were observed with occupancy
greater than 85 %. High demand levels are consistently noted north of 16th Street which
includes the Lincoln Road Mall.
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17Th Streets 41
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 6: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
Zone 3 - Occupancy Weekday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 285%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
I
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
42
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
,4 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 7: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Zone 3 - Occupancy Saturday 12pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
1
I
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 51h and 17th Streets
43
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Considering Zone 3 as a whole, the following table shows the overall adequacy of the Zone 3
parking supply.
Table 35: Zone 3 Parking Adequacy
Adequacy
(5)
(146)
42
428
0
39
358
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Adequacy in this Zone reflects a surplus; however, on- street and the City Garages
experienced parking deficits. When considering the area on a block -by -block basis, parking
adequacy issues may be identified, and to illustrate this fact, the tables that follow show the
parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 36: Zone 3 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
2,507
2,512
1,314
1,460
699
657
702
274
0
0
114
75
5,336
4,978
Adequacy
(5)
(146)
42
428
0
39
358
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Adequacy in this Zone reflects a surplus; however, on- street and the City Garages
experienced parking deficits. When considering the area on a block -by -block basis, parking
adequacy issues may be identified, and to illustrate this fact, the tables that follow show the
parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 36: Zone 3 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
301
19
19
16
(3)
302
51
51
59
8
303
67
67
65
(2)
304
53
53
46
(7)
305
53
53
57
4
306
52
52
65
13
307
50
50
47
(3)
308
23
23
20
(3)
309
5
5
0
(5)
310
29
50
79
120
41
311
85
25
110
106
(4)
312
53
20
73
76
3
313
19
180
199
204
5
314
20
274
294
719
425
315
35
66
101
88
(13)
(continued next page)
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
44
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
316
58
58
57
(1)
317
16
74
90
140
50
318
93
93
76
(17)
319
14
14
14
0
320
10
92
102
115
13
321
36
36
45
9
322
40
40
48
8
323
31
31
43
12
324
41
41
51
10
325
45
45
44
(1)
326
26
26
24
(2)
327
18
18
21
3
328
33
21
54
60
6
329
38
38
43
5
330
38
38
40
2
331
36
36
37
1
332
38
38
37
(1)
333
33
33
34
1
334
12
12
14
2
335
17
17
26
9
336
57
57
56
(1)
337
38
20
58
52
(6)
338
25
144
169
149
(20)
339
31
31
23
(8)
340
8
8
7
(1)
341
33
40
73
62
(1 1)
342
56
56
50
(6)
343
26
26
30
4
344
29
29
29
0
345
29
29
33
4
346
50
50
43
(7)
347
40
40
46
6
348
35
35
32
(3)
(continued next page)
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
45
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
Vi. WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
349
43
43
43
0
350
37
37
37
0
351
32
32
31
(1)
352
42
42
43
1
353
56
56
48
(8)
354
30
30
24
(6)
355
29
29
25
(4)
356
42
42
35
(7)
357
36
36
33
(3)
358
49
49
40
(9)
359
43
43
46
3
360
42
42
45
3
361
35
35
43
8
362
45
45
50
5
363
45
45
48
3
364
16
16
18
2
365
25
25
29
4
366
17
17
20
3
367
54
54
52
(2)
368
39
39
30
(9)
369
11
1,460
1471
1,327
(144)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 46
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
V} WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING TURNOVER
Each space within the Zone 3 sample was noted as being empty or parked on a weekday
(Friday, November 8th) and a weekend day (Sunday, November 10th). This data was used to
estimate the average length of stay and parking utilization of the area sampled. The tables
below summarize the specific samples for the weekday and weekend day Zone 3
observations.
The Weekday data sample is from within a Residential Zone. During this period, the parking is
not restricted to residents and no payment is required. Occupancy levels peaked at 85% and
remained fairly consistent. The average length of stay is calculated at 2.15 hours. When
considering the data by area, the sample along Jefferson Avenue experienced an average
length of stay of 3.5 hours, with more than half of the sample staying four or more hours. This
indicates spaces in residential restricted zones are used for long -term parking during the non-
restricted time periods and experience lower turnover than areas in metered areas.
Table 37: Zone 3 - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
11:00 AM
300
300
Jefferson
Meridian
8th
17th
12
8
9 7
8 5
8
7
9
6
10
7
9
7
9
5
9
5
8
7
Totals:
% Occupied:
20 17 12 15 15 17 16 14 14 17
85% 60% 75%
75%
85% 80% 70% 70% 85%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 38: Zone 3 - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
300
300
Jefferson
Meridian
8th
17th
12
8
7
27
3
6
1
1
3
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
1
1
3.5
1.4
Total Vehicles: 20 34 9 2 3 1 1 3 2
Total Hours:
34 18 6 12 5 6 21 16
2.15
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
47
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The Weekend survey includes parking during the Residential Permit restrictions. Occupancy
was consistently high, but peaked later in the day at 82 %. The average length of stay
increased to 4.08 hours, nearly double the average length of stay when the Residential Parking
restrictions are enforced.
Table 39: Zone 3 - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
5:00 PM
300
300
Euclid Ave
Lenox
10th
10th
14
14
11 10
10 10
9
11
9
13
7
11
8
11
8
12
10
13
7
11
Totals: 28 21
% Occupied:
20 20 22 18 19 20 23 23
75% 71% 71% 79% 64% 68% 71% 82% 82%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 40: Zone 3 - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone Stree
location Sample'
'4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
300 Euclid Ave
10th
14
5
5
2
4
1
1
0
3
3.4
300 Lenox
10th
14
6
1
0
1
1
2
2
6
4.8
Total Vehicles: 28 11 6 2 5 2 3 2 9
Total Hours: 1 1 12 6 20 10 18 14 72
4.08
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 48
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Known or planned developments for Zone 3 include the projects registered with the Miami
Beach Planning Department, along with the details on the planned type and size of the land
use, including any planned parking for the development.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The Miami Beach Planning Department provided several projects within Zone 3 for
consideration as detailed in the following table. For this analysis, we assume these
developments will be completed and impact parking demand within the next three years.
The list of proposed improvements may not represent all potential real estate projects or
business expansions being considered; only those projects in the planning process at this time.
Table 41: Zone 3 Planned Projects
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Residential
(Units)
Retail
(SF)
Restaurant
(Seats)
Event
Venue
(Persons)
313
Lincoln Road
Retail I
13,845
313
Lenox Avenue
Restaurant
403
313
17th Street
Retail
17,898
314
Michigan Avenue
Entertainment
300
322
Jefferson Avenue
Residential
3
337
Lincoln Road
Retail
33,750
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Based on the projected Zone 3 land uses, planned developments are projected to generate
an additional parking demand of 170 spaces, as shown in the following table, moving from
top to bottom.
Table 42: Zone 3 Added Parking Demand
Total Added Land Use:
Base Demand Ratio
`o Non - Captive Ratio
�, 3 Drive Ratio
Time of Day
3 65,493
1.75
1.00
0.80
0.70
4.00
0.60
0.80
0.80
403
0.25
0.60
0.80
1.00
300
0.25
0.60
0.80
0.50
Added Demand
3 101 48 18
Total Demand: 170
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
49
Residential
Retail
Restaurant
Event
Description
(Units)
(SF)
(Seats)
Venue
Total Added Land Use:
Base Demand Ratio
`o Non - Captive Ratio
�, 3 Drive Ratio
Time of Day
3 65,493
1.75
1.00
0.80
0.70
4.00
0.60
0.80
0.80
403
0.25
0.60
0.80
1.00
300
0.25
0.60
0.80
0.50
Added Demand
3 101 48 18
Total Demand: 170
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
49
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
Planned developments within Zone 3 are primarily focused in an area north of 16t" Street.
Additionally, no added parking supply is planned for the projects; however, 39 existing spaces
will be displaced from the Zone 3 inventory of spaces.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
Historical growth for Zone 3 is considered, but only for the area north of 16t" Street. The
reasoning for this is that the area south of 16t" Street considered primarily residential that is at or
very near capacity. The area north of 16t" Street transitions from residential to high density
commercial, with the Lincoln Road Mall as the main attraction. This area is adjusted based on
historical annual growth rates.
The annual growth rates for several key criteria were analyzed to project three potential future
growth scenarios for the north of 16t" Street in Zone 3. The basis of the data is the Current
Economic Conditions report compiled and provided by the Tourism, Cultural & Economic
Development Department. Factors considered include annual hospitality sales; average daily
population statistics; hotel occupancy rate; jobs; building permits; and the food and beverage
tax receipts. The annual growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012 as
shown in the following table. All criteria for all periods generate positive growth, with the
exception of the number of building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are calculated with a
slight decrease for that period.
Table 43: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods
6 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria '06-'12 '07-'12 '08 -'12 '09 -'12 '10-'12 '11-'12
Hotel Room Sales 5.43% 3.71% 4.90% 12.54% 12.09% 20.61%
m Food Sales 3.37% 4.12% 4.52% 7.50% 8.04% 8.07%
c Alcohol Sales 3.72% 3.25% 6.20% 9.50% 9.13% 17.08%
Hospitality Sales 4.28% 3.74% 5.06% 9.97% 9.93% 15.10%
Average Daily Population 3.74% 4.34% 5.68% 4.87% 5.24% 10.06%
Hotel Occupancy
1.11% 0.62% 1.06% 5.13% 5.27% 0.17%
Jobs 2.26% 3.35% 3.94% 3.35% 3.45% 3.98%
Building Permits 0.51% -0.19% 3.33% 6.88% 11.12% 12.73%
Food and Beverage Tax 7.04% 6.94% 8.71% 10.00% 8.71% 5.33%
Average Annual Growth 3.16% 3.13% 4.63% 6.70% 7.29% 7.90%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets 50
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data shown and Walker's understanding of the potential development
planned in the area north of 16th Street, three annual growth scenarios were developed for
use in projecting the overall change in the parking demand, as shown in the annual growth
scenarios that follow below.
Table 44: Zone 3 Annual Growth Scenarios (north of 16th Street)
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
Parking adequacy was projected for each of the three annual growth rate scenarios,
assuming that in year three the planned developments are completed, and changes to the
parking supply are implemented.
Table 45: Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year
EPS
Scenario 1
x h�
Demand
Adequacy
2014
5,336
5,056
280
2015
5,336
5,136
200
''
2016
5,297
5,389
(92)
2017
5,297
5,305
(8)
2018
5,297
5,393
(96)
2019
5,297
5,484
(187)
2020
5,297
5,577
(280)
�
�
�
�
2021
5,297
5,674
(377)
2022
5,297
5,774
(477)
'
��,
791)
2023
5,297
5,876
(579)
(1 545}
74 11
(2,114)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
The scenarios assume equally distributed annual growth across the areas north of 16th Street,
plus the addition of the known planned developments in the third year (2016). Parking is
projected to reach a short fall at some point in all scenarios. This analysis only includes the
known developments detailed in the report.
Zone 3 - Residential Core Between 5th and 17th Streets
51
ZONE 4:
OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
4 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
INTRODUCTION
The Ocean Drive Corridor is a highly visible and active
commercial district that runs along the coast that also includes a
mix of residential land uses to the west. There are several City
owned and public parking garages in this area, as well as
multiple valet operations. At the time of the observations, Collins
Avenue was undergoing major re- construction along the eastern
portion of the roadway. The construction resulted in eliminating
numerous on- street parking spaces and reducing traffic to two
lanes. Zone 4 also contains Washington Avenue, a major north
south artery with active entertainment, restaurant, and
commercial land uses with high on- street parking and pedestrian
demand.
STUDY AREA
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 4 is bordered by 17th Street to the north, the Ocean to the east, 5th Street to the south,
and Pennsylvania Avenue to the west. The area is broken down into 47 individual blocks for
analysis, with a total of 7,305± spaces inventoried for our analysis.
PARKING INVENTORY
A majority of the parking within Zone 4 is provided by the City, as detailed in the following
table and pie chart.
Table 46: Zone 4 Parking Inventory Detail
Public Lot
3%
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
1,616
2,424
126
1,897
213
1,029
7,305
*Note: Several Private parking areas were noted, but not assessable for observation
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
53
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
iiilWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
For the Zone 4 analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on-
street spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces, and 95% for off - street private spaces. The EPS
for Zone 4 is 6,550 spaces as shown in the following table.
Table 47: Zone 4 Effective Parking Supply
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor 54
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Inventory
ESF
1,616
0.85
2,424
0.90
126
0.90
1,897
0.90
213
0.90
1,029
0.95
7,305
Effective Supply*
1,379
2,181
114
1,707
191
978
6,550
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor 54
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AgiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
CURRENT CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday within Zone 4.
Weekday observations were conducted on Thursday, November 7th and the Saturday
observations were made on November 9th. Weather conditions during the Weekday
observations were good; Saturday observations experienced intermittent rain during the day
and rain in the evening.
The following table provides a summary of both observation periods with the overall peak
observation period identified for both days.
Table 48: Zone 4 Occupancy Observations
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off- Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
1,616
PEAK
HOUR
1,365
84%
251
2,424 1,426
59%
998
126 121
96%
5
1,897 927
49%
970
213 140
66%
73
1,029
7,305
1,029
100%
0
5,008
69%
2,297
1,406 1,339
87% 83%
210 277
1,015 884
42% 36%
1,409 1,540
102 105
81% 83%
24 21
800 553
42% 29%
1,097 1,344
172 163
81% 77%
41 50
1,029 1,029
100% 100%
0 0
4,524 4,073
62% 56%
2,781 3,232
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Garage
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Public City Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
1,616 1,469 1,416 1,473
91% 88% 91%
147 200 143
2,424 1,820 1,450 1,202
75% 60% 50%
604 974 1,222
126 119 102 120
94% 81% 95%
7 24 6
Public Garage 1,897 720 632 556
Occupancy Rate 38% 33% 29%
Unoccupied Spaces 1,177 1,265 1,341
Public Lot
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Off - Street Private
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
Total
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
213 150 148 198
70% 69% 93%
63 65 15
1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029
100% 100% 100%
0 0 0
7,305 5,307 4,777 4,578
73% 65% 63%
1,998 2,528 2,727
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
55
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
PARKING OCCUPANCY DETAIL
The peak observed occupancy (73 %) observed on Saturday at 4:00 PM does not indicate an
adequacy problem. However, when considering occupancy on a block -by -block basis, there
are several blocks with high occupancy. In addition, this area experiences high traffic
volumes, which could lead to the perception that sufficient convenient parking is unavailable.
The heat maps shown below and on the following page illustrate parking occupancy for the
peak Weekday and Saturday observation periods.
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor 56
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 8: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
Zone 4 - Occupancy Weekday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85°/0
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy .69%
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
57
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 9: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Zone 4 - Occupancy Saturday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
58
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
ADJUSTING OBSERVATIONS DUE TO WEATHER
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Rain affected parking activity when Walker's Saturday occupancy counts were taken;
therefore, in an effort to account for the inclement weather, hourly occupancy data from the
City owned parking garages for the rainy day were compared with the following weekend's
activity, when weather was a non - factor. Based on this comparison, Zone 4 experienced an
overall average decrease of 18% when observed by Walker. The decrease was adjusted in
our model by increasing the peak parking demand for Saturday from 73% to 86 %.
PARKING ADEQUACY
As a whole, Zone 4 exhibited a small surplus of spaces; however, certain areas, such as on-
street parking, City Lots, and Private parking areas experienced a parking deficit. The
following table shows the overall parking adequacy of for Zone 4.
Table 49: Zone 4 Parking Adequacy
Adequacy
(354)
33
(26)
857
14
(236)
288
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
When considered on a block -by -block basis, parking adequacy exist. To illustrate this, the
following table shows the adjusted parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 50: Zone 4 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
1,379
1,733
2,181
2,148
114
140
1,707
850
191
177
978
1,214
6,550
6,262
Adequacy
(354)
33
(26)
857
14
(236)
288
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
When considered on a block -by -block basis, parking adequacy exist. To illustrate this, the
following table shows the adjusted parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 50: Zone 4 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
401
27
16
43
48
5
402
28
28
26
(2)
403
54
54
43
(1 1)
404
55
55
47
(8)
405
39
39
41
2
406
41
195
236
353
117
407
33
38
71
75
4
408
37
29
66
70
4
409
43
247
290
293
3
410
36
36
43
7
(continued next page)
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
59
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
• PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
411
20
88
108
101
(7)
412
9
268
277
264
(13)
413
16
673
689
652
(37)
414
31
31
27
(4)
415
19
48
67
87
20
416
17
17
14
(3)
417
7
7
8
1
418
22
239
261
537
276
419
43
513
556
765
209
420
34
34
29
(5)
421
26
26
24
(2)
422
30
53
83
80
(3)
423
22
22
24
2
424
22
22
20
(2)
425
26
26
24
(2)
426
22
22
24
2
427
16
16
25
9
428
25
426
451
606
155
429
6
168
174
441
267
430
26
26
21
(5)
431
19
19
18
(1)
432
36
24
60
53
(7)
433
36
26
62
67
5
434
32
97
129
151
22
435
45
18
63
70
7
436
47
47
45
(2)
437
38
38
37
(1)
438
14
14
20
6
439
61
61
49
(12)
440
39
118
157
472
315
441
10
10
8
(2)
442
1
537
538
495
(43)
443
39
17
56
55
(1)
444
62
62
54
(8)
445
24
24
21
(3)
446
67
67
64
(3)
447
67
67
59
(8)
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
60
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER ANALYSIS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The parking turnover analysis was conducted using a sample of parking spaces within the
Zone. The data used allows the average length of stay to be calculated as well as the parking
utilization of the sample area. The tables below summarize the specific samples for the Zone 4
weekday and weekend observations.
Table 51: Zone 4 - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Peak Hour
Zone Street: Location:
Sample
1 1:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
1 1:00 AM
400 15th Penn
400 Wash Espanola
400 9th Washington
400 Ocean Dri 10th
400 Ocean Dri 13th
8
8
6
15
8
8 8 8 8 7 8 7 7
8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8
6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5
11 10 10 10 12 11 13 13
8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8
8
8
6
10
8
Totals:
% Occupied:
45 41 40 40 40 40 40 41 41 41
91% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 91% 91% 91%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 52: Zone 4 - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
400
15th
Penn
8
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
4
5.1
400
Wash
Espanola
8
14
7
2
1
1
1
2
0
2.3
400
9th
Washington
6
9
5
1
1
1
0
1
1
2.4
400
Ocean Drive
10th
15
20
7
5
1
1
3
2
0
2.3
400
Ocean Drive
13th
8
14
6
4
3
0
1
1
0
2.2
Total Vehicles: 45 58 27 13 7 4 7 6 5
Total Hours:
58 54 39 28 20 42 42 40
2.54
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
61
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 53: Zone 4 - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
location:
Sample
10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
2:00 PM
400
Ocean Drive
6th
15
14 15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
400
Ocean Drive
8th
16
16 16
15
15
16
16
15
15
16
400
10th
Ocean
17
15 13
14
14
14
12
12
13
14
400
Washington
l l th
12
8 9
10
11
11
12
12
11
11
Totals: 60 53
% Occupied:
53 54 55 56 55 54 54 56
88% 88% 90% 92% 93% 92% 90% 90% 93%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 54: Zone 4 - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Resuhs
Length of Stay
Zone Street:
location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
400 Ocean Drive
6th
15
20
17
6
3
3
2
0
1
2.3
400 Ocean Drive
8th
16
19
17
11
2
0
5
0
0
2.3
400 10th
Ocean
17
28
8
5
4
0
0
0
4
2.2
400 Washington
l l th
12
23
9
6
5
1
0
0
0
1.9
Total Vehicles: 60 90 51 28 14 4 7 0 5
Total Hours:
90 102 84 56 20 42 0 40
2.18
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
62
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Known or planned developments in Zone 4 include any projects registered with the Miami
Beach Planning Department, and the details on the planned type and size of the land use,
including any planned parking.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The Miami Beach Planning Department provided a list of projects in Zone 4 as detailed in the
following table. The primary focuses for this area is retail and hotel additions and we assumed
the proposed developments will be completed and impact parking demand within the next
three years. The list of proposed improvements may not represent all potential real estate
projects or business expansions being considered; only those projects currently in the planning
process.
Table 55: Zone 4 Planned Projects
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Hotel
(Rooms)
Retail
(SF)
405
Collins Avenue
Retail Addition
1,700
407
Collins Avenue
Retail
25,725
416
17 Street
Hotel Addition
7
418
Lincoln Road
Retail
62,368
418
Collins Avenue
Hotel Addition
98
433
Washington Avenue
Hotel Addition
51
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Based on the land uses proposed for development in Zone 4, additional parking demand of
251 spaces is projected, as shown in the following table, moving from top to bottom.
Table 56: Zone 4 Added Parking Demand
Total Added Land Use:
-a n
Base Demand Ratio
CO C o Non - Captive Ratio
au, a Drive Ratio
Time of Day
156 89,793
1.00
1.00
0.80
0.70
4.00
0.60
0.80
0.95
Added Demand
87 164
Total Demand: 251
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
63
Hotel
Retail
Description
(Rooms)
(SF)
Total Added Land Use:
-a n
Base Demand Ratio
CO C o Non - Captive Ratio
au, a Drive Ratio
Time of Day
156 89,793
1.00
1.00
0.80
0.70
4.00
0.60
0.80
0.95
Added Demand
87 164
Total Demand: 251
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
63
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
No additional supply of spaces is anticipated in conjunction with the planned developments,
as most are additions to existing land -uses that are located within an historic district that does
not require additional parking.
HISTORICAL GROWTH
Annual growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012, as shown in the
following table. All criteria for these periods generate positive growth, with the exception of
the number of building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are projected to decrease slightly.
Table 57: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods
6 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria '06 -'12 '07 -'12 '08-'12 '09-'12 '10-'12 '11-'12
Hotel Room Sales 5.43% 3.71% 4.90% 12.54% 12.09% 20.61%
m Food Sales 3.37% 4.12% 4.52% 7.50% 8.04% 8.07%
in Alcohol Sales 3.72% 3.25% 6.20% 9.50% 9.13% 17.08%
Hospitality Sales 4.28% 3.74% 5.06% 9.97% 9.93% 15.10%
Average Daily Population 3.74% 4.34% 5.68% 4.87% 5.24% 10.06%
Hotel Occupancy 1.11% 0.62% 1.06% 5.13% 5.27% 0.17%
Jobs 2.26% 3.35% 3.94% 3.35% 3.45% 3.98%
Building Permits 0.51% -0.19% 3.33% 6.88% 11.12% 12.73%
Food and Beverage Tax 7.04% 6.94% 8.71% 10.00% 8.71% 5.33%
Average Annual Growth 3.16% 3.13% 4.63% 6.70% 7.29% 7.90%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor 64
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
Ag. WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data and our understanding of the potential for development within
the Ocean Drive Corridor, three annual growth scenarios were developed to project the
overall changes to the parking demand in the short -term. The annual growth scenarios are
shown in the following table.
Table 58: Zone 4 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate Consideration
1 3.1% (Smallest Average Annual Growth)
2 5.7% (Average Daily Population
3 7.0% (80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
Parking adequacy over the next ten years are provided for each of the growth rate scenarios
that assume the planned developments are completed and the changes to the parking
supply have been implemented by year three.
Table 59: Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year
EPS
Scenario 1
��
�_ ":
���
��
x
r
, r
��
Demand
Adequacy
^ �
2014
6,550
6,456
94�
2015
6,550
6,656
(106)9q
2016
6,550
7,113
(563)
'�
2017
6,550
7,334
(784)
2018
6,550
7,561
(1,011)
2019
6,550
7,795
(1,245)
2020
6,550
8,037
(1,487)
2,9
2021
6,550
8,286
(1,736)
;
2022
6,550
8,543
(1,993)'�[4�
2023
6,550
8,808
(2,258)
2.
;
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
The scenarios represent equally distributed annual growth across the zone with the addition of
the known planned developments in the third year (2016). Parking is projected to reach a
deficit within one year for all but the most conservative scenario. Walker's analysis includes
only the known developments detailed herein, and assumes 100% occupancy in the private
restricted parking areas that were not available for review during the observation period.
Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
65
ZONE 5:
SOUTH POINTE
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
INTRODUCTION
South Pointe is a unique area with a mix of residential, high rise
luxury condominiums, restaurants, hotels, and public park areas.
Construction was noted in several areas that included off - street
parcels along South Pointe Drive and on Ocean Drive. There are
several gated communities with private parking that is not
accessible for observation, as well as private valet parking areas
that could not be observed, such as Joe's Stone Crab Restaurant
and a Marriot Resort. Most of the area falls under Residential
Parking permit Zone 1, with restricted on- street parking for
residents in the evenings and weekends. In addition, parking
meters are generally located south of 1st Street and east of
Washington Avenue. The City operates a few small metered
surface lots, but no parking garages within Zone 5.
STUDY AREA
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 is bordered by 5th Street to the north, the coast to the east, South Pointe Drive to the
south, and Alton Road to the west. The area is broken down into 37 individual blocks for
analysis, with a total of 2,755± spaces inventoried and observed in our analysis.
PARKING INVENTORY
A mix of on- street, off - street public garages, and small surface parking lots comprise Zone 5.
Multiple valet operations reside within the area, with one of the largest noted at Joe's Stone
Crab Restaurant. The following table and chart detail the Zone 5 parking inventory.
Table 60: Zone 5 Parking Inventory Detail
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
1,101
0
342
311
182
819
2,755
Public Lot
7%
Public
Garage
11%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe
67
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AiliWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
EFFECTIVE PARKING SUPPLY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
For the Zone 5 analysis, we applied a general Effective Supply Factor ( "ESF ") of 85% for the on-
street spaces, 90% for off - street public spaces, and 95% for off - street private spaces. The EPS
for Zone 5 is 2,470 spaces as shown in the following table.
Table 61: Zone 5 Effective Parking Supply
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 68
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Inventory
ESF
1,101
0.85
0
0.90
342
0.90
311
0.90
182
0.90
819
0.95
2,755
Effective Supply*
939
0
309
280
164
778
2,470
* EPS calculated by block and rounded
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 68
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
40 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
CURRENT CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Observations were conducted at three intervals on a Weekday and Saturday of the
inventoried parking spaces within the Zone. Weekday observations were conducted on
Thursday, November 7th and Saturday November 9th. Weather conditions during the
Weekday observations were good; Saturday observations experienced intermittent rain during
the day and rain in the evening. The following table provides a summary of the observations
for both periods with the overall peak observation period identified in each table.
Table 62: Zone 5 Occupancy Observations
On- Street
Occupancy Rate
Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
1,101 936 758 768 On -Skeet
85% 69% 70% Occupancy Rate
165 343 333 Unoccupied Spaces
PEAK
HOUR
1,101 816 642 834
74% 58% 76%
285 459 267
Public City Garage 0 0 0 0 Public City Garage 0 0 0 0
Occupancy Rate - - Occupancy Rate - -
Unoccupied Spaces 0 0 0 Unoccupied Spaces 0 0 0
Public City Lot 342 250 224 169 Public City Lot 342 165 201 140
Occupancy Rate 73% 65% 49% Occupancy Rate 48% 59% 41%
Unoccupied Spaces 92 118 173 Unoccupied Spaces 177 141 202
Public Garage 311 232 135 61 Public Garage 311 119 96 101
Occupancy Rate 75% 43% 20% Occupancy Rate 38% 31% 32%
Unoccupied Spaces 79 176 250 Unoccupied Spaces 192 215 210
Public Lot 182 105 123 93 Public lot 182 146 116 120
Occupancy Rate 58% 68% 51% Occupancy Rate 80% 64% 66%
Unoccupied Spaces 77 59 89 Unoccupied Spaces 36 66 62
Off -Street Private 819 676 661 623 Off -Street Private 819 652 689 596
Occupancy Rate 83% 81% 76% Occupancy Rate 80% 84% 73%
Unoccupied Spaces 143 158 196 Unoccupied Spaces 167 130 223
Total 2,755 2,199 1,901 1,714 Total 2,755 1,898 1,744 1,791
Occupancy Rate 80% 69% 62% Occupancy Rate 69% 63% 65%
Unoccupied Spaces 556 854 1,041 Unoccupied Spaces 857 1,011 964
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 69
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING OCCUPANCY DETAIL
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The overall peak observed occupancy occurred during the Weekday 12:00 p.m. with 80% of
the spaces occupied. On a block -by -block basis, several blocks were noted with high
occupancy. The heat maps illustrate parking occupancy for the peak Weekday and
Saturday observations.
Figure 10: Heat Map of Peak Weekday Parking Occupancy
Zone 5 - Occupancy Weekday 12pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 70
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Figure 11: Heat Map of Peak Saturday Parking Occupancy
Zone 5 - Occupancy Saturday 12pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 285%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 71
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
• PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The table below depicts the overall parking adequacy within Zone 5 based upon Walker's
observation of this area.
Table 63: Zone 5 Parking Adequacy
Adequacy
3
0
59
48
59
102
271
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Adequacy within Zone % is at a surplus; however, when considered on a block -by -block basis,
parking adequacy issues may be identified. To illustrate this, the following pages provide a
table showing parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 64: Zone 5 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
City
Garage
City Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Private
Total:
Effective Supply
Demand
939
936
0
0
309
250
280
232
164
105
778
676
2,470
2,199
Adequacy
3
0
59
48
59
102
271
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Adequacy within Zone % is at a surplus; however, when considered on a block -by -block basis,
parking adequacy issues may be identified. To illustrate this, the following pages provide a
table showing parking adequacy on a block -by -block basis.
Table 64: Zone 5 Parking Adequacy by Block
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot -
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Demand
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
501
3
4
5
12
62
50
502
17
122
139
164
25
503
21
21
18
(3)
504
22
22
18
(4)
505
21
21
19
(2)
506
11
110
121
146
25
507
15
28
43
64
21
508
20
17
37
78
41
509
14
14
24
10
510
6
6
9
3
511
28
28
31
3
512
24
24
31
7
513
26
26
22
(4)
514
45
45
38
(7)
515
49
49
41
(8)
516
43
43
37
(6)
517
46
33
79
105
26
518
41
41
34
(7)
(Continued next page)
Zone 5 - South Pointe
72
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Block
On- Street
Public City
Garage
Public City
Lot
Public
Garage
Public Lot
Off - Street
Private
Total
Demand
Effective
Supply
Surplus/
(Deficit)
519
44
44
36
(8)
520
38
38
37
(1)
521
27
27
33
6
522
35
35
37
2
523
14
14
15
1
524
9
147
156
149
(7)
525
35
60
95
91
(4)
526
31
28
59
63
4
527
35
35
37
2
528
56
211
267
274
7
529
67
11
85
163
193
30
530
27
195
222
228
6
531
7
7
10
3
532
2
2
2
0
533
26
48
74
78
4
534
13
13
10
(3)
535
9
9
8
(1)
536
5
5
26
21
537
4
159
163
202
39
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe 73
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING TURNOVER ANALYSIS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Parking turnover data allows the average length of stay to be calculated, as well as the
parking utilization within the sample area. The tables below summarize the specific samples for
the weekday and weekend observations for Zone 5.
Table 65: Zone 5 - Weekday Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Results
Hourly Occupancies
Peak Hour
Zone Street: Location:
Sample
1 1:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM
12:00 PM
500 South Pointe Lot
10
10 10 10 10 9 9 7 5
10
500 4th Street Eucild Ave
11
10 11 11 9 9 10 9 10
11
Totals: 21 20 21
21 19 18 19 16 15 21
% Occupied: 95% 100% 100% 90% 86% 90% 76% 71% 100%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 66: Zone 5 - Weekday Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
500
500
South Pointe
4th Street
Lot
Eucild Ave
10
11
11
5
3
6
2
4
1
3
0
1
6
2
1
3
0
0
2.9
3.3
Total Vehicles: 21 16 9 6 4 1 8 4 0
Total Hours:
16 18 18 16 5 48 28 0
3.10
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe
74
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 67: Zone 5 - Weekend Occupancy Sample
LPI Occupancy Resuks
Hourly Occupancies
Length of Stay
Peak Hour
Zone
Street:
Location:
Sample
10:00 AM 1 1:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM
2:00 PM
500
500
South Pointe
1st Street
Lot
Meridian
11
7
6 6
3 5
0
4
4
7
1 1
7
10
4
1 1
4
5
5
1 1
7
Totals: 18
9
11
4 11 18 14 15 10 18
% Occupied: 50% 61% 22% 61% 100% 78% 83% 56% 100%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Table 68: Zone 5 - Weekend Length of Stay
LPI Length of Stay Results
Length of Stay
Zone Street:
Location:
Sample
1 hr
2 hr
3 hr
4 hr
5 hr
6 hr
7 hr
8 hr
Average
500 South Pointe
500 1st Street
lot
Meridian
11
7
14
10
12
3
1
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1.8
2.3
Total Vehicles: 18 24 15 2 3 1 0 1 1
Total Hours:
24 30 6 12 5 0 7 8
1.96
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 — South Pointe 75
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
410 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE CONDITIONS
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Known or planned developments within Zone 5 include any projects registered with the Miami
Beach Planning Department, and the details on the planned type and size of the land use,
including planned parking for the development.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The Miami Beach Planning Department provided several Zone 5 projects, and we assume
these developments will be completed and impact parking demand within the next three
years. The list may not represent all potential real estate projects or business expansions being
considered; only those projects currently in the planning process.
Table 69: Zone 5 Planned Projects
BLOCK
STREET
Description
Residential
(Units)
Hotel
(Rooms)
Retail
(SF)
Restaurant
(Seats)
Parking
Spaces
504
Meridian Avenue
Hotel Addition
32
510
Ocean Drive
Residential
30
510
Ocean Drive
Hotel Addition
130
511
Ocean Drive
Hotel Addition
17
511
Ocean Drive
Hotel Addition
14
515
Meridian Avenue
Residential
4
525
Ocean Drive
Residential
10
30
529
Commerce Street
Mixed -Use
32
6,836
163
320
531
Collins Avenue
Restaurant
240
285
532
Ocean Drive
Mixed -Use
9
112
3,290
99
200
535
Commerce Street
Residential Addition
5
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
Based on the land uses projected in Zone 5, the proposed developments are projected to
generate an additional demand of 447 spaces, as summarized below, moving from top to
bottom.
Zone 5 - South Pointe
76
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Table 70: Zone 5 Added Parking Demand
Total Added Land Use:
90 305 10,126
502
Added Demand
Total Demand:
126 244
447
17
60
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
Several of the developments in Zone 5 include a parking component, including the addition of
robotic parking garages. A total of 835 spaces are projected, which equate to an effective
supply of 752 spaces. Many of the projects are currently under construction, thus displaced
spaces have already been accounted for and based on current conditions, 32 more spaces
will be displaced due to construction.
Zone 5 — South Pointe 77
Residential
Hotel
Retail
Restaurant
Description
(Units)
(Rooms)
(SF)
(Seats)
Total Added Land Use:
90 305 10,126
502
Added Demand
Total Demand:
126 244
447
17
60
Source: Miami Beach Planning Department and Walker Parking Consultants
CHANGES TO PARKING SUPPLY
Several of the developments in Zone 5 include a parking component, including the addition of
robotic parking garages. A total of 835 spaces are projected, which equate to an effective
supply of 752 spaces. Many of the projects are currently under construction, thus displaced
spaces have already been accounted for and based on current conditions, 32 more spaces
will be displaced due to construction.
Zone 5 — South Pointe 77
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4* WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
HISTORICAL GROWTH
Annual growth rates are calculated for each period covering 2006 - 2012, as shown in the
following table. All criteria for all periods generate positive growth, with the exception of the
number of building permits from 2007 - 2012, which are projected to decrease slightly.
Table 71: Historical Annual Growth Data
Annual Periods 6 5 4 3 2 1
Criteria '06'12 '07 -'12 '08 -'12 '09-'12 '10 -'12 '11-'12
Hotel Room Sales 5.43% 3.71% 4.90% 12.54% 12.09% 20.61%
m Food Sales 3.37% 4.12% 4.52% 7.50% 8.04% 8.07%
c°n Alcohol Sales 3.72% 3.25% 6.20% 9.50% 9.13% 17.08%
Hospitality Sales 4.28% 3.74% 5.06% 9.97% 9.93% 15.10%
Average Daily Population 3.74% 4.34% 5.68% 4.87% 5.24% 10.06%
Hotel Occupancy 1.11% 0.62% 1.06% 5.13% 5.27% 0.17%
Jobs 2.26% 3.35% 3.94% 3.35% 3.45% 3.98%
Building Permits 0.51% -0.19% 3.33% 6.88% 11.12% 12.73%
Food and Beverage Tax 7.04% 6.94% 8.71% 10.00% 8.71% 5.33%
Average Annual Growth 3.16% 3.13% 4.63% 6.70% 7.29% 7.90%
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
GROWTH SCENARIOS
Based on the historical data and our understanding of the potential for development within
South Pointe, three annual growth scenarios were developed to project the overall change to
the parking demand in the short -term. The growth scenarios are shown in the following table.
Table 72: Zone 5 Annual Growth Scenarios
Annual
Growth
Scenario Rate
Consideration
1 3.1%
2 5.7%
3 7.0%
(Smallest Average Annual Growth)
(Average Daily Population
(80th Percentile of Average Annual Growth)
Source: Select data from the Current Economic Conditions Report and Walker Parking Consultants
Zone 5 - South Pointe
78
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AilWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
FUTURE PARKING ADEQUACY
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Parking adequacy over the next ten years is projected for each of the growth rate scenarios
that assume the planned developments are completed and the changes to the parking
supply have been implemented in year three.
Table 73: Projected Future Parking Adequacy
Year EPS
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2,470
2,470
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,130 l0
3,22 (37)
3,32 (137)
3,430 (240)
3,536 (346)
nd Adequacy
;2,518«
3,141
3,361
3,596
3,848
4,117
4,405
4,713
x„;5,043
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Each scenario assumes equally distributed annual growth across the zone with the addition of
the known planned developments in the third year (2016). Parking is projected as adequate
until the fourth year, when adequacy begins to be an issue in scenario 2 and 3. Under
scenario 1, parking is adequate until the seventh year when deficit conditions could occur.
Walker's analysis includes only the known developments detailed in this report, and assumes
100% occupancy of private restricted parking areas that were not available for review during
the observation period.
Zone 5 - South Pointe 79
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND ALTERNATIVES
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The Miami Beach Parking Division has incorporated many of today's leading parking strategies
to assist in promoting public parking and improving the ability of the user to understand the
parking options. These include incorporating a parking app to locate public parking and
obtain real -time parking occupancy of city owned parking garages; providing pay -by- license
plate multi -space meters; utilizing License Plate Recognition to monitor and assist with
enforcement; establishing residential parking zones; and allowing pay by cell phone at the
meters to name a few. In this section of the report, we review residential parking zone options
and additional methods to manage public parking.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING ZONES
Residential parking zones are located throughout the study area,
each with specific restrictions and posted. Residential parking zones
restrict parking to permit holders during posted time periods. Only
residents within the area qualify to obtain a residential parking
permit. This allows normally unrestricted parking to be reserved for
residents and guests to ensure parking is not taken by non - residents
during the posted restricted time periods. Examples of the residential
parking zone signage are provided to the right. The predominant
restricted parking is between 6:00 pm and 7:00 am Sunday - Friday
and all day Saturday and Sunday; although some signage indicates
24/7 restrictions or only evening restrictions.
OBSERVATIONS
A detailed review of the parking activity within residential permit
zones during non - restricted time periods was conducted to
determine the length of stay and usage. A sample of spaces was
made on an hourly basis to determine if each vehicle had a permit
and how long it was parked over an 8 hour period. Key findings of
this detailed sample include:
• 96% average occupancy;
• 58% vehicles did not have residential parking permit;
• 5.24 hour average length of stay;
• 79% remaining parked for 6 to 8 hours.
This demonstrates that during non - restricted time periods the parking
supply plays a role in dispersing parking demand and providing a
valuable parking option to the general public.
This is especially true in areas with limited off - street parking availability
and in residential areas adjacent to high commercial corridors where
parking is limited.
Management Strategies and Alternatives
7 A Dd
24 HO,t
SUN A HOLIDAYS
RESIDENTIAL
PERMIT ONLY
TOW —AWAY
ZONE
81
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
ViWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
One disadvantage to allowing un- restricted parking in residential parking zones during certain
periods is that there is no incentive to encourage turn -over of the parking spaces. The turn-
over observation and length of stay during un- restricted time periods indicates that a majority
of the unrestricted spaces are used by a mix of residents and employees of the local area.
Those spaces with 24/7 restrictions had little to no on- street parking activity during the
weekend periods. These posted restrictions were limited to a few areas with single family
homes and not the norm.
OPTIONS
Potential improvements to consider during the unrestricted time periods in areas without
meters include:
Changing all residential zones to 24/7 enforcement: While this provides a solution, it greatly
reduces the availability of parking in certain areas that would otherwise benefit from sharing
the parking assets when they are typically not needed by residents.
Adding paid parking for times during un- restricted parking: Parking meters are already
located in some residential parking zones for use during non - restricted time periods. This can
be effective, but may not be aesthetically desirable for some residential areas. In addition,
the cost to install and maintain may not be justifiable as the main reason some of these un-
restricted spaces are used is because there is no fee to park in these spaces.
Adding time restrictions during un- restricted parking periods: This option promotes turnover of
the spaces during non - restricted time periods; however, it does require additional
enforcement. It may also be a disadvantage for actual residents parking in the area.
Adding restrictions for non - residents while providing exemptions to permit holders: This option
adds restrictions to non - residential permit holders during un- restricted time periods to
encourage turn -over and discourages abuse of the parking during non - restricted time periods.
Monterey, California allows residential permit holders to enjoy parking in their permit zones and
to ignore posted time limit restrictions. In addition, registered permit holders may pay a
discount for parking if payment is required.
To enforce unique restrictions within residential zones, a database of valid permit holder
vehicle license plates could be established to allow mobile license plate recognition cameras
to scan and identify non - registered vehicles. These systems can also be used to track length
of stay for non - registered vehicles. While not 100 percent, these systems can greatly improve
enforcement and reduce the time needed to manually check each vehicle within an area
and allow more frequent checks to verify length of stay.
Management Strategies and Alternatives 82
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
The following strategies are provided to enhance or improve the parking experience or
reduce parking demand within the study area without building addition parking assets.
ENHANCED WAYFINDING AND SIGNAGE
Each city owned public parking lot is clearly marked and uniformly
signed within the study area. The information provided
corresponds to the information found on the Miami Beach parking
App, hosted by ParkMe. The area of parking wayfinding that
could be improved is signage guiding patrons to the off - street
parking. This is particularly true for locating parking structures with
larger parking inventories.
Additional directional signage along key thoroughfares should be
added to direct patrons to parking. Many cities include parking
directional information on directional signage, such as on the sign
located to the right that directs patrons to the convention center
and Art Deco Welcome Center. Parking information could be
added to this type of sign by adding "Parking" with an arrow
where appropriate.
This can be taken a step further by adding dynamic signage to
show the number of available spaces or if spaces are available in
a particular parking garage or area with an arrow to provide
directions. Strategically placed signs with real time dynamic
messages can direct users to the nearest parking facility with
available spaces. Although more common in Europe, several U.S.
cities, including Seattle, San Jose, and Charlotte have installed
these types of parking wayfinding systems.
Dynamic wayfinding signage installed in Seattle, Washington
Management Strategies and Alternatives
83
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014
BRANDING AND PROMOTING PARKING
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Miami Beach has a website incorporated with the city website, as well as an App, to assist in
promoting parking. Some cities have taken this a step further by branding their parking
program with a unique logo and phrase. Branding examples include SF Park in San Francisco,
L.A. Express Park in Los Angeles, the "Five Seasons" Transportation and Parking Department of
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and "Central City Parking" in Downtown Kalamazoo, Michigan. Branding
can assist with educating the public on parking and providing a recognizable image to go to
when thinking about parking.
Verbal elements should include a name, style, and taglines. Visual elements include fonts,
colors, shapes, and graphic elements (including logo). The elements and standards of the
program should be used in a consistent manner. Ubiquity is achieved by using a full range of
appropriate media.
Actively communicating and marketing the available public
parking spaces is a never ending marketing campaign. Many
cities have developed brochures with a map showing public
parking areas, city web -site links to a page that contains
downtown parking information, and consistent signage and
banners directing customers to public parking areas. The city's
webpage can be linked to merchant and downtown association
websites to encourage visitors to learn about parking before
coming downtown. Downtown businesses and government
offices should have parking brochures with maps available for the
general public.
Evanston, Illinois, developed a "Where to park in Downtown
Evanston" flyer and provided a copy on ticketed vehicles. The
brochure includes a map of public parking options with rates
designed to assist parkers so that they can avoid a ticket in the
future.
DYNAMIC PRICING
OWNTOWN
EVANSTON
Charging for parking is an effective strategy to encourage turnover and reducing parking
demand. Some cities have effectively instituted dynamic pricing to further manage parking
demand based the actual parking demand. Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco all use
parking occupancy to adjust on- street parking rates. Generally, occupancy greater than 85
percent results in a higher price. Occupancy levels below 85 percent result in a lower parking
rate. Over time, this approach has been shown to spread parking demand to underutilized
areas. Occupancy can be measured with sensors or regular visual counts. Changes to
parking rates are typically subject to a maximum adjustment amount, frequency, and
advance notification of changes.
Management Strategies and Alternatives
84
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
AUGUST 22, 2014 PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Los Angeles California uses variable pricing by time of day, to reduce prices during known low
demand periods and increase rates during known peak demand periods.
This strategy may be useful in Miami Beach during peak weekends or in season demand
periods. Increases in funds may be used to add additional parking or features to the system.
The popularity of the area may limit the effectiveness of the program in Miami Beach, as there
are limited areas in the study area to redistribute parking demand during peak demand
periods.
CAR SHARING PROGRAMS
Car sharing was noted as available in at least one location in Miami Beach at the 500 Collins
garage. Car sharing can reduce parking demand by providing a network of privately owned
vehicles that are rented by the hour or day to registered users. Costs for using a vehicle
include all typical ownership costs, including gas and insurance. By having a car share service
available, participants can have use of a vehicle when needed without having to actually
own a vehicle. Studies and surveys indicate each car share vehicle in service can be used by
6 to 10 households, thus reducing parking and traffic congestion where successfully
implemented.
• 2005 Transportation Research Board reported 21 percent of
car share members gave up a vehicle after joining.
• 2006 survey by Flexcar and Zipcar in Washington DC
indicated 30 percent of car share members gave up a
vehicle after joining and 61 percent postponed purchasing
another vehicle.
Some cities assist in promoting car sharing by providing
strategically reserved parking spaces to store vehicles when not in
use. Vendors include Zipcar, Hertz Connect, U -Haul Car Share,
and Enterprise Car Share.
PARKING RESERVATIONS
Allowing parking reservations may be an option to increase the level of service and provide
premium pricing. Parking reservations allow users to request a parking space in advance if
available and guarantee that space with a premium charge. Users receive a confirming bar
code that can be presented to enter the facility even when the facility is shown as full. This
type of system can be used to reduce stress for users and increase revenue for the parking
facility.
Management Strategies and Alternatives
85
APPENDIX 1
ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
'0 PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Weekday 3pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
000 Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5.69%
Key
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
ViWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Weekday 6pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Weekday 9pm
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 10pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
. PARKING CONSULTANTS
�` WALKER
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Sunday 1 am
■I IMP
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
P WALKER
�ilr PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
— Study Area / Zone Boundaries
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4VillWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
on I Ng
Fi
e�
►
,1 itrIst34
adi
lid
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 1: ZONE 1- ALTON ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 1 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
• • Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
" 1
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Appendix 1: Zone 1 - Alton Road Corridor
APPENDIX 2
ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
ViWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
V} WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 2 - Occupancy Weekday 3pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
I
I I
Key
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 2 - Occupancy Weekday 6pm
MN RIM
1
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 2 - Occupancy Weekday 9pm
■ ■ Study Area / Zone Boundaries
OBlock Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
I l
I 1
Key
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Oa
17th St.�i
4A _ _ _ 111 313 ; 314
{338)
Zone 2 - Occupancy Saturday 7pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
8 Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
mor-ig
f 1
l
Key
■
4one2
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4Qai WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 1 5- 1988.00
Zone 2 - Occupancy Saturday lOpm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
1
I I
Key
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 2: ZONE 2 - CONVENTION CENTER AND SUNSET HARBOUR
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 2 - Occupancy Sunday 1 am
I
I 1
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Appendix 2: Zone 2 - Convention Center and Sunset Harbour
APPENDIX 3
ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE (BETWEEN 5TH & 17T" STREETS)
OCCUPANCY MAPS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING CONS'�ULTANTS
PARKING DEMAND ANALYST
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 3 - Occupancy Weekday 4pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 2285%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy <_69%
Key
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE PROJECT # 15 -1 988.00
Zone 3 - Occupancy Weekday 7pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
.;4WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE PROJECT # 15 -1 988.00
Zone 3 - Occupancy Weekday 10pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 285%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
_ .4
u� a
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4WWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 3 - Occupancy Saturday 12pm
— Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 285%
1 Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
1 1
Key
r
ti
t
�'-
tti71
f
v
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
AiiiWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE
Zone 3 - Occupancy Saturday lOpm
=IN NMI
WON
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
-441 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 3: ZONE 3 - RESIDENTIAL CORE PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 3 - Occupancy Saturday 5pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy __69%
Key
11
E7)
445 438
spanola ay
•
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Appendix 3: Zone 3 - Residential Core
APPENDIX 4
ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
OCCUPANCY MAPS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Weekday 4pm
— Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
Key
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Weekday 8pm
I
Key
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
t
k
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Weekday 12am
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy <_69%
Key
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
14 WALKER
?ARK NG :_ONSu1TAN "S
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Saturday 4pm
— — Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy s69%
wan
Key
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
PROJECT # 1 5- 1988.00
55
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Saturday 8pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
NEMII
Key
r'
1 �
i t
� t
� t
� r
r
I
Zon4 4
e
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
44 WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 4: ZONE 4 - OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
Zone 4 - Occupancy Sunday 12am
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
Key
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Appendix 4: Zone 4 - Ocean Drive Corridor
APPENDIX 5
ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
OCCUPANCY MAPS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Weekday 12pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy <_69%
I
1
Key
I -1 r ,
ti_'
.rilia
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
'41i. PARKING CONSULTANTS
WALKER
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Weekday 6pm Key
— • Study Area / Zone Boundaries
0 Block Numbers
Occupancy ?85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5569%
1 1
I 1
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Weekday lOpm Key
I 1
I I
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy __69%
i
1
f
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Saturday 12pm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 2.85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5_69%
MEE
1 1
I
Key
r � T
y I
L - - - -7
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Saturday 6pm Key
IMMO
I
1
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy 22.85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 5_69%
SOUTH BEACH
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
4WWALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX 5: ZONE 5 - SOUTH POINTE
PROJECT # 15- 1988.00
Zone 5 - Occupancy Saturday lOpm
Study Area / Zone Boundaries
Block Numbers
Occupancy >_85%
Occupancy 70% - 84%
Occupancy 569%
1 1
1
Key
gone 51'
Source: Walker Parking Consultants
Appendix 5: Zone 5 - South Pointe