2015-29078 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29078
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. (THE
AGREEMENT); SAID AMENDMENT INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE
AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE SERVICES FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE
REDESIGN AND ENGINEERING OF THE PATHWAY TO THE WIDER 25-FOOT
WIDTH FOR THE MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR PHASE II
PROJECT, BETWEEN THE 46TH STREET PARKING LOT AND THE 64TH
STREET PARKING LOT,AND INCREASING THE COST OF THE AGREEMENT
IN THE AMOUNT OF $78,234.23.
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2012, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 20-10/11,the
Mayor and City Commission approved Resolution No. 2012-27861, approving and authorizing the
execution of an agreement between Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc. and the City(Agreement)
for the design, bid, award, and construction administration services for the Middle Beach
Recreational Corridor Phase II project; and
WHEREAS, the Project consists of the construction of an on-grade pedestrian pathway
encompassing eighteen City blocks or approximately 9,305 feet,from 46th Street to Allison Park at
64th Street to the southern terminus of the existing North Beach Recreational Corridor; and
WHEREAS,the pathway will also serve as a portion of the coastal north/south connector in
the larger Atlantic Greenway Network(AGN)which supports the sustainable initiative of alternative
transportation throughout the City; and
WHEREAS,on November 19th 2014,the City Commission gave the direction to redesign the
pathway to a wider width of 25 feet(where allowable)to better accommodate both pedestrians and
cyclists; and
WHEREAS,this change in design strategy came at the 60% plan completion level, over the
last seven months, the design team has been negotiating with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection to permit a wider pathway of 25 feet; and
WHEREAS, in order for Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. to complete the redesign and
engineering of the pathway to the wider 25-foot width, Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc.will need
an additional $78,234.23 to be allocated to cover this change in design; and
WHEREAS an Amendment to the Agreement between the City and Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc. is required to allow the change order for the additional services required; and
WHEREAS, funding in the amount of $12,229,276 is budgeted in FY 2014/15 budget to
cover the anticipated costs for the construction of the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase I I
inclusive of these additional services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,that the Mayor and City Commission
hereby approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement between the City and Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc.; said amendment increasing
the scope of the Agreement to include services for the completion of the redesign and engineering
of the pathway to the wider 25-food width for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II
project, between the 46th Street parking lot and the 64th Street parking lot, and increasing the cost
of the Agreement in the amount of$78,234.23.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this $ day of 1/4-hif/ .
ATTEST:
11117;11/1:'
`
Raf-el ' ranado, ity 'ler_"' ........... ...0 ,e, Mayor
�w,�-
s 1.INCORP ORAT;'
#,- ' A'
TCH 2� ,.• APPROVED AS TO
111' FORM & LANGUAGE
&FOR XECUTION
.(— c (5
City Attorney .! . Dote
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of The City Of Miami Beach, Florida, Approving
And Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute A Change Order to Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc., Dated June 29, 2015 (The Agreement); Said Change Order In The Amount Of
$78,234.23, For Additional Service For The Completion Of The Redesign And Engineering Of The
Pathway To The Wider 25-Foot Width For the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II Project,
Between The 46th Street Parking Lot And The 64th Street Parking Lot.
Key Intended Outcome Supported:
Ensure Comprehensive Mobility Addressing All Modes Throughout The City.
Supporting Data: N/A
Item Summary/Recommendation:
Pursuant to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-10/11 for design, bid, award, and
construction administration services for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II project, at its
May 11, 2011 meeting, the City Commission authorized an award for design, bid, award, and
construction administration services agreement with Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. in the amount
of$529,629.61.
The Middle Beach Recreational Corridor MBRC Phase II consists of the construction of an on-grade
pedestrian pathway encompassing eighteen City blocks or approximately 9,305 feet. The pathway will
be constructed along the western side of the coastal dunes and east of oceanfront properties,
between the 46th Street parking lot and the 64th Street parking lot. The pathway will also serve as a
portion of the coastal north/south connector in the larger Atlantic Greenway Network.
On November 19th 2014, The City Commission gave the direction to redesign the pathway to a wider
width of 25 feet (where allowable) to better accommodate pedestrians and cyclists. This change in
design strategy came at the 60% plan completion level. Over the last seven months, the design team
has been negotiating with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to permit a wider
pathway of 25 feet.
The Environment and Sustainability Division is requesting additional $ 78,234.23 to be allocated to the
additional service agreement from Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. in order to complete the
redesign and re-engineering of the pathway to the wider 25-foot width. This additional funding request
could be allocated from the construction budget, currently at$12,229,276.
Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. has submitted an Additional Services Agreement for the amount
of $78,234.23 to complete the redesign and engineering of the pathway to the wider 25-foot width.
This Additional Services Agreement has been submitted to the City's Environment & Sustainability
Division for further review and recommendation. City staff reviewed the Agreement and found that the
amount was fair and reasonable.
The Administration recommends adopting the Resolution
Advisory Board Recommendation:
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account
Funds: 1 $ 78,234.23 388-2033-069357
OWBPI r11% Total $78,234.23
Financial ••.ct Summary: $78,234.23 will be transferred from the Middle Beach
Recreational Corridor construction funds into design.
City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:
Elizabeth Wheaton x6121
Sign-Offs:
Department Director Assistant City Manager City Manager
T:\AGENDA12015\July\ENVIRONMENTAL\MBRC-SUMMARY.docx
AGENDA ITEM R`1 E
MIAMIBEACH
� DATE 7-1(-1
0. MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members f the City • mission
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: July 8, 2015
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAY AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER TO CALVIN, GIORDANO &
ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED JUNE 29, 2015 (THE AGREEMENT); SAID CHANGE
ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $78,234.23, FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR THE
COMPLETION OF THE REDESIGN AND ENGINEERING OF THE PATHWAY TO
THE WIDER 25-FOOT WIDTH FOR THE MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL
CORRIDOR PHASE II PROJECT, BETWEEN THE 46TH STREET PARKING LOT
AND THE 64TH STREET PARKING LOT.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
The Administration recommends adopting the Resolution
FUNDING
The current funding available is $12,229,276 for the construction phase.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-10/11 for design, bid, award, and
construction administration services for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II
project, at its May 11, 2011 meeting, the City Commission authorized an award for design, bid,
award, and construction administration services agreement with Calvin, Giordano & Associates,
Inc. in the amount of$529,629.61.
The Middle Beach Recreational Corridor MBRC Phase II consists of the construction of an on-
grade pedestrian pathway encompassing eighteen City blocks or approximately 9,305 feet. The
pathway will be constructed along the western side of the coastal dunes and east of oceanfront
properties, between the 46th Street parking lot and the 64th Street parking lot. The pathway will
also serve as a portion of the coastal north/south connector in the larger Atlantic Greenway
Network.
On November 19th 2014, The City Commission gave the direction to redesign the pathway to a
wider width of 25 feet (where allowable) to better accommodate pedestrians and cyclists. This
Commission Memorandum—MBRC 25-foot Redesign- Change Order No. 1
Page 2 of 2
change in design strategy came at the 60% plan completion level. Over the last seven months,
the design team has been negotiating with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
to permit a wider pathway of 25 feet.
In order to complete the redesign and engineering of the pathway to the wider 25-foot width,
Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. will need additional monies to cover this change in design.
Utilizing the amounts identified below as "remaining", the following will be the amounts needed
for the Additional Services Agreement to redesign those affected portions of the Design 2 —
Design Services phase:
Service Description Initial Fee Spent Remaining Additional Total needed
Services
Agreement
Fees
Landscape $ 99,295.14 $ 91,462.63 $ 7,832.51 $ 24,160.50 $ 16,327.99
Architectural and ($ 24,160.50
Engineering Needed -$
Services 7,832.51
Remaining)
Construction $ 61,376.61 $ 35,688.00 $ 25,688.61 $ 72,481.50 $ 46,792.89
Drawings and ($ 72,481.50
Specifications Needed -$
25,688.61
Remaining)
Permitting $ 54,466.03 $ 27,025.38 $ 27,440.65 $ 42,554.00 $ 15,113.35
($ 42,554.00
Needed -$
27,440.65
Remaining)
TOTAL $78,234.23
The Environment and Sustainability Division is requesting additional $ 78,234.23 to be allocated
to the additional service agreement from Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. in order to
complete the redesign and re-engineering of the pathway to the wider 25-foot width. This
additional funding request could be allocated from the construction budget, currently at
$12,229,276.
COST ANALYSIS
Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. has submitted an Additional Services Agreement for the
amount of $78,234.23 (attachment) to complete the redesign and engineering of the pathway to
the wider 25-foot width.
This Additional Services Agreement has been submitted to the City's Environment &
Sustainability Division for further review and recommendation. City staff reviewed the
Agreement and found that the amount was fair and reasonable.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends adopting the Resolution .
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-27861
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH CALVIN GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
PURSUANT TO THE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 20-
10/11, FOR DESIGN, BID AND AWARD, AND CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, FOR THE MIDDLE BEACH
RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR; SAID AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF
$529,629.61, WITH FUNDS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED IN THE
MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR PHASE II PROJECT.
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2011, the Mayor and City Commission approved the
issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-10/11, for the Design, Bid, Award, and
Construction Administration Services for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II
Project (the "RFQ"); and
WHEREAS, the RFQ was issued on March 9, 2011, with an opening date of April 8,
2011; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2011, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution
No 2011-27656, accepting the recommendation of the City Manager and authorizing the
Administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm of Coastal Systems
International, Inc.; to negotiate with the second-ranked firm of Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc. should negotiations with the top-ranked firm be unsuccessful; and to
negotiate with the third-ranked firm of the Kimley-Horn &Associates, Inc. should negotiations
with the first or second-ranked firms be unsuccessful; and
WHEREAS, the Administration was unsuccessful following several months of
negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Coastal System International, Inc; and
WHEREAS, the Administration has successfully negotiated the attached professional
services agreement with the second-ranked firm, Calvin, Giordano & Associated, Inc., in the
amount of$529,629.61.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission hereby approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., pursuant to the
(RFQ) No. 20-10/11, for Design, Bid and Award, and Construction Administration Services,
for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor, in the amount of $529,629.61; with funds
previously appropriated in the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Phase II Project.
A0/2- .27/(6 l
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st day of March, 2012
ATTEST:
VD GA& pada.„,.___ , ,
Robert It Parcher, City Clerk M. i Herrera :ower, Mayor
\V`. .
vs-%
AP•°4!VED AS TO : - •�
FORM : 'l,r:NGUAGE *i INCORP ORATED'
& FOR EX ION 2 ',�h
41111ICH 26 `***
City Attorney Date
APPROVED AS TO
T:\AGENDA/2012\3-21-12\RFQ 20-10-11-MBR-RESO FORM &LANGUAGE
FOR EXECUTION
„fro— •mey Dat
•
- - Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc.
E X C E P T I O N A L S O L U T I O N S T M
June 29, 2015
Mr. Elizabeth Wheaton, AICP, LEED AP BD+C
Building Code Services Assistant Building Director
Coastal Engineering City of Miami Beach
Code Enforcement 1700 Convention Center Drive
Construction Engineering Miami Beach, FL 33139
and Inspection
Construction Services
Contract Government
Data Technologies RE: MBRC 25-foot Redesign
and Development CGA Proposal No. 11-4080.2
Emergency Management
Services
Engineering Dear Mr. Wheaton, AICP, LEED AP BD+C,
Environmental Services
Facilities Management We are pleased to submit this proposal for Professional Services on the above
Indoor Air Quality
referenced project.
Landscape Architecture
Municipal Engineering I. Professional Engineering Services
Planning
Public Administration A. Civil Engineering
Redevelopment
and Urban Design
Surveying and Mapping 1. Please refer to Schedule A
Traffic Engineering
Transportation Planning B. Electrical Engineering
GSA Contract Holder 1. Please refer to Schedule A
II. Professional Landscape Architecture Services
A. Please refer to Schedule A.
1800 Eller Drive
Suite 600
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33316
954.921.7781 phone
954.921.8807 fax
www.cgasolutions.com
FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH PORT ST.LUCIE HOMESTEAD TAMPA/CLEARWATER JACKSONVILLE ATLANTA
June 29,2015
Page 2 of 8
BASIS OF PROPOSAL
• Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc. represents its judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the
general guidance of the CLIENT since Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. has
no control over the cost of labor and material, or over competitive bidding or
market conditions. Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. does not guarantee the
accuracy of such opinions as compared to contractor bids or actual cost to the
CLIENT.
• Any outside engineering services, studies, or laboratory testing not specifically
mentioned in the Scope of Services will be the responsibility of the CLIENT. All
municipal, permit, and agency fees as well as Title Certificates will be paid by the
CLIENT.
• Basic services outlined within this proposal shall be considered complete when the
project plans are submitted to the regulatory agencies for Certification.
• Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. is performing the consultant services set
forth in this Agreement strictly as a professional consultant to CLIENT. Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between
Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. and any contractor or subcontractor
performing construction activities on the project, or any of CLIENT's other
professional consultants.
• Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. shall not be responsible for the contractor's
schedules or failure to carry out the construction in accordance with the
construction documents. Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. shall not have
control over or charge of acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors, or
their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the
construction.
• Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. will require that all consultants carry proper
insurance, including professional liability insurance, if appropriate.
• Permit construction certification will include one partial and one final inspection.
ADDITIONAL FEES
The following services are NOT included in this proposal and will be considered
Additional Services, which will be addressed in a separate contractual agreement. The
services include but are not limited to:
• Architectural, structural(i.e.,retaining walls, bridges, docks), mechanical(i.e.,
fire pumps), fire protection, geotechnical and testing, environmental assessment,
power, gas, telephone, cable television, site lighting services.
• Calculations for needed fire flow for site demands, based on building type use and
size, if required.
• Calculations of off-site flood stages.
June 29,2015
Page 3 of 8
• Construction quality control inspections.
• Off-site engineering and negotiations for off-site easements, if required(other
than as specified in the Scope of Services).
• Permit application or negotiation with permitting authorities other than those
specifically listed herein.
• Preparation of construction contract documents, other than drawings and
technical specifications e.g > bid schedule, project manual);
;
• Professional land surveying not included in the scope of services(i.e., buried
utility investigation, easement research, condominium do c ume n ts, project stake-
out out and as-built drawings).
• Professional services required due to conditions different from those itemized
under the Scope of Services or due to events beyond the control of Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc.
• Professional services required, due to changes in the site plan initiated by the
CLIENT, their representatives or other consultants(e.g., architects, landscape
architects, etc.) after either design or preparation of the construction drawings has
commenced.
• Re-review of rejected shop drawings.
• Review and approval of Contractor pay requests.
• Review of Data supplied by the CLIENT (i.e. GIS data sets, databases, aerial
images, etc.) required for integration into this project.
• Review of shop drawings for contractor or Client selected alternatives, materials,
products, etc.
• Special shop drawing annotation and modification to expedite shop drawing
approval process.
• Updated boundary survey, site evaluation or closing assistance work, unless
specified above.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. and its consultants will be reimbursed for the
printing of drawings and specifications, deliveries, Federal Express services, required
travel time and travel expenses, long distance telephone calls, fax transmittals,postage,
fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project,
renderings, models and mock-ups required by CLIENT, as required. Reimbursable
expenses and sub-consultant invoices will be billed directly to the CLIENT at a
multiplier of 1.25.
MEETING ATTENDANCE
June 29,2015
Page 4 of 8
Due to the difficulties of predicting the number or duration of meetings,no meetings
other than those listed above, are included in the Schedule of Fees shown below.
Preparation for and meeting attendance, as necessary, will be provided on a time and
p g asY P
materials basis and will be billed at the standard hourly rates in accordance with the
attached Hourly Rate Schedule.
SCHEDULE OF FEES
Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. will perform the Scope of Services for a lump sum
fee as shown in the proposed Schedule of Fees:
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF FEES
I Professional Engineering Services
A Professional Civil Engineering Services $55,660.00
Final Engineering $55,660.00
B Professional Electrical Engineering Services $30,256.00
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering $30,256.00
II Professional Landscape Architecture Services $53,280.00
Other Landscape Architecture Work Activity $53,280.00
HI Meetings not included in I thru H Hourly
TOTAL (Plus Hourly Services) $139,196.00
TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT
• All aspects of GIS data development created by Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc., will be property of the CLIENT and will be given to the CLIENT at time of
project completion.
• Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. and the CLIENT agree by their signatures on
this document that each party will not hire or attempt to hire any staff from the
other party while under contract together.
June 29,2015
Page 5 of 8
• Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. is preparing and providing drawings, plans,
specifications and other documents as outlined in the scope of services for this
Agreement for use in the construction of this project, based upon design and
construction criteria prepared and provided by others, including but not limited to
the CLIENT and CLIENT's consultants. Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. is
not responsible for any errors and omissions in the aforesaid design and
construction criteria provided by others.
• CLIENT agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and, at Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc.'s option, defend or pay for an attorney selected by Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc., to defend Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc., its
officers, agents, servants, and employees against any and all claims, losses,
liabilities, and expenditures of any kind, including attorney fees, any appellate
attorney costs, court costs, and expenses, caused by, arising from, or related to
any acts, omissions or negligence of CLIENT or its consultants.
• CLIENT agrees to limit Calvin, Giordano, &Associates, Inc.'s liability for any
and all claims that CLIENT may assert on its own behalf or on behalf of another,
including but not limited to claims for breach of contract or breach of warranty, to
the amount of fees paid to Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc.,pursuant to this
Agreement.
• Drawings, specifications, and other documents and electronic data furnished by
Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. in connection with this project are
instruments of service. All original instruments of service shall be retained by
Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. and will remain their property, with all
common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including copyright, in those
instruments. This information provided in the instruments of service is
proprietary and will not be shared with others without prior written consent. The
CLIENT may request reproducible copies, and all original documents upon
payment of all outstanding invoices, and expenses.
• In the event of termination in accordance with this Agreement or termination not
the fault of Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc., Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc. shall be compensated for services properly performed prior to receipt of
notice of termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due.
• Invoices for work accomplished to date will be submitted monthly and are payable
within thirty(30) days. The CLIENT will pay invoices upon receipt and
understands interest charges of 1.5%per month will be applied to any unpaid
balance past thirty(30)days. Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. may elect to
stop work until payment is received. If work is stopped for thirty(30) days or
more, Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. may request compensation for start-up
costs when work resumes.
June 29,2015
Page 6 of 8
• The CLIENT or their representative shall be available to meet with Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc. and provide decisions in a timely manner throughout
the course of the project. The CLIENT will provide all plans and other pertinent
information, which are necessary for Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. to
provide complete professional services as outlined in this contract.
• The terms of Agreement shall be valid for the Client's acceptance for a period of
thirty(30) days from the date of execution by Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc. after which time this contract offer becomes null and void if not accepted
formally(evidenced by receipt of an executed copy of this document). All rates
and fees quoted in this document shall be effective for a period of six(6) months,
after which time they may be renegotiated with the CLIENT.
• This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than seven(7)
days written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party
initiating the termination. Failure of CLIENT to make payments to Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc., in accordance with this Agreement, shall be
considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
• CLIENT and Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc., respectively, bind themselves,
their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to
this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives
of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither
CLIENT nor Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. shall assign this Agreement
without written consent of the other.
• This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the
CLIENT and Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc. and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This
Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc. and the CLIENT.
• Unless otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the
place where the project is located.
June 29,2015
Page 7 of 8
TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT
• This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than seven(7)
days written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party
initiating the termination. Failure of CLIENT to make payments to Calvin,
Giordano &Associates, Inc., in accordance with this Agreement, shall be
considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination.
• In the event of termination in accordance with this Agreement or termination not
the fault of Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc., Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc. shall be compensated for services properly performed prior to receipt of
notice of termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Calvin, Giordano &Associates,
Inc. is prepared with the necessary manpower to proceed with the proposed scope of
services upon receipt of the executed authorization. Our personnel are committed to
completing the project in a timely manner. Please indicate your acceptance of this
proposal by signing below and returning one executed copy of the contract to this
office. We look forward to working with you in making this project a success.
Sincerely,
CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES,INC.
Dennis J. Giordano
President
June 29,2015
Page 8 of 8
Cost of these services are $139,196.00 plus hourly as noted in fee breakdown.
ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT
CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: Date:
Name: Dennis J. Giordano
Title: President
By: Date:
Name: Mr. Elizabeth Wheaton, AICP, LEED AP
Title: Assistant Building Director
SCHEDULE"A"-SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR PROJECT
ADDITIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE 25-FOOT REDESIGN
OF"PART 2—DESIGN SERVICES" OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT
Background
The City Commission gave the direction to redesign the Beachwalk project to a wider width of 25 feet
(where allowable) to better accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists. This change in design strategy
came at the 60% completion level of the plans preparations of the contract's "Part 2 — Design Services"
phase, when a substantial amount of the 15-foot design direction had been designed and engineered and
after several rounds of review by the State agencies negotiating what allowances the State would permit
in meeting the directives of the City Commission.
Originally, the fees allocated for the Design 2—Design Services phase was:
Landscape Architectural and Engineering Services $99,295.14
Construction Drawings and Specifications $61,376.61
Permitting $54,466.03
Following the negotiations phase with the State to account for this change in design directive, the
following are the amounts spent and remaining for the completion of the tasks in the Design 2 — Design
Services phase in the original contract:
Landscape Architectural and Engineering Services $91,462.63 spent;
($ 7,832.51 Remaining)
Construction Drawings and Specifications $35,688.00;
($25,688.61 Remaining)
Permitting $27,025.38;
($27,440.65 Remaining)
(Total Remaining$60,961.77)
In order to redesign and re-engineer the Beachwalk to the wider 25-foot width, Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc. (CGA) will need additional monies to be allocated to cover for the expenses in this
change in design and direction. Utilizing the amounts identified above as "remaining", the following will
be the amounts needed for these Additional Services Agreement (ASA) (shown in bold) to redo those
affected portions of the Design 2—Design Services phase:
Landscape Architectural and Engineering Services
$24,160.50 Needed -$ 7,832.51 Remaining =$ 16,327.99 for this ASA
Construction Drawings and Specifications
$72,481.50 Needed -$25,688.61 Remaining = $46,792.89 for this ASA
Permitting
$42,554.00 Needed -$27,440.65 Remaining = $ 15,113.35 for this ASA
ASA Total Requested: $78,234.23
ADDITIONAL SERVICES DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following is a detailed description of the Scope of Work to be provided by the Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc. (CGA) team for this Additional Services Agreement to the City of Miami Beach (City)
relative to the design, permitting, and implementation of the proposed "Middle Beach Recreational
Corridor" Project(Project) between 46th Street to 64th Street. It is the intent that the scope outlined in this
Additional Services Agreement shall apply to the affected portions of the section titled Phase 2—Design
Services in the original contract, wherein once completed the original contract will take precedence for the
Page 1 of 8
remaining phases of the project, including Phase 3-Bidding and Award Services and Phase 4-
Construction Administration Services.
The purpose of this ASA is to redesign the Beachwalk to a wider 25-foot width, where allowable, to create
a multi-purpose, public access corridor, within State-owned lands, which extends along the western edge
of the dunes immediately east of the Erosion Control Line (at times immediately abutting the Erosion
Control Line consistent with State-issued directives). The corridor will be approximately 9,650 linear feet
running in a north-south direction connecting the south end of an existing Beachwalk at Alison Park with
the existing Beachwalk recently constructed in front of Indian Beach Park. The corridor will be
constructed of hardscape paver materials, and it will identify connections at beach access points and
other at public access areas. Consistent with the negotiations with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), the 25-foot width may be designed where the following minimum
criteria can be met:
• Where the proposed paver path can be re-aligned as close to the Erosion Control Line as
possible;
• Where a minimum 50-foot wide vegetated dune can remain in place;
• Where the engineering minimizes any 'cutting' action on the existing dune and which prefers the
addition of beach-compatible fill;
• Where the dune system's secondary beach dune can be strengthened with additional fill,
especially in areas where invasive exotic vegetation is being removed; and
• Where the definition of the 25-foot width is inclusive of all construction impacts, including the
extents of any fill compaction supporting any proposed header curbs.
This scope assumes that the FDEP will not object to the proposed path location and/or construction
materials. This scope assumes that there will be no third-party comments submitted to the FDEP during
the permitting process that will trigger significant negotiations or re-design of the project, and that no
petition for Administrative Hearing pursuant to Ch. 120 of the Florida Statutes will be filed upon permit
issuance. If any of these are needed, then any services associated with them shall be done through a
separate ASA.
In addition to the permitting services with the FDEP, CGA will assist in responding to comments issued by
the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as a condition of any grant funds issued to the City for
this project. Comments will be addressed through the FDOT's Electronic Review Comments (ERC)
system.
Because there may be inherent conflicts in the requests, conditions of approval and stipulations outlined
by different agencies, this scope assumes that the City will take a lead role in facilitating a conversation
between the agencies and 'bringing them to the table' to determine an applicable condition of approval
that will satisfy any conflict in direction—CGA has accounted for fees to support the City in this endeavor.
It is understood that additional public outreach will not be a part of this scope of services. Services
required by the City for any additional public outreach may be provided on a time-and-material basis
though a separate ASA.
CONSULTING SERVICES
PART 1 —PLANNING SERVICES—Not included in this ASA
PART 2 — DESIGN SERVICES (This scope shall replace sections 2.1 Landscape Architectural and
Engineering Services, 2.2.2 60% Final Construction Drawings, 2.2.3 90% Final Construction Drawings,
2.2.4 100% Final Construction Drawings, and 2.3 Permitting of Part 2— Design Services of the original
contract.)
Page 2 of 8
2.1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND PERMITTING SERVICES
2.1.1 Landscape Architectural and Hardscape Design: Landscape Architecture design services will
include the initial layout and geometry of the trail based on the design development. Landscape
planting design will be completed in accordance with the design development for the proposed
Project improvements. This scope assumes that the plant selection previously developed for the 15-
foot version of the plan, which was a product of collaborating with a dune ecologist recommended by
the City and after having done consultations with both the Parks and Recreation and Planning
departments. As a result of the negotiations with the FDEP for a 25-foot wider paver area, the
alignment of the Beachwalk will be within close proximity to the Erosion Control Line, frequently
eliminating the opportunities for adequate space within State-owned lands to provide adequate plants'
growing areas. As such, planting buffers between the paver Beachwalk and the ECL will be
eliminated from the scope in the majority of the areas. It is understood that planting buffers will be
provided in areas between the ECL and the proposed edge of the Beachwalk where they exceed 5
feet in width. The same planting species used east of the Beachwalk on the dune will be used in any
planting areas between the ECL and the Beachwalk, specifically vegetation that is low-growing as
had been directed by the Parks and Recreation Department of the City. It is understood that any
vegetated privacy buffers will desired by any private property will have to be provided on private
property and at their expense, as these will not be a part of this scope of work. Hardscape paving
strategies will be developed, including materials, colors, and finishes for the path, edging, fixtures,
and other features, to be consistent with previously constructed segments of the Beachwalk.
2.1.2 Engineering Design: The CGA team will provide the initial engineering design services required
for the Project elements outlined in the design development. The grading design will be initialized to
meet the aesthetic intent of the landscape planting areas. It is assumed that existing beach access
points across the dune will be maintained or streamlined. Access to street ends, existing riparian
properties, and other access corridors will be reviewed. Access for emergency vehicles will be
reviewed and illustrated. This scope of services assumes that no new major structures (bathrooms,
walls, etc.) will be designed as part of this Project. Cross sections for the corridor will be developed
that will include the path pavers and base material.
2.1.3 Dune Fill Design: CGA will prepare initial design plans suitable for submittal to the DEP
illustrating the proposed dune fill to expand the dune profile, as necessary, to restore the dune where
needed to establish plant installation. Fill elevation and slopes will be designed. Required connections
to street ends and landward properties will be considered in this initial fill design. A proposed fill
volume will be calculated. After review and conceptual approval by the DEP, the fill design will be
incorporated into the Preliminary Construction Drawings.
2.1.4 Electrical Engineering: Pedestrian scale bollard lights with low wattage bulbs and
shielding/louvers will be used, as pre-selected by the City and consistent with fixtures utilized in
previous segments of the recreational corridor. CGA will coordinate light siting relative to the project's
aesthetic considerations. The electrical and lighting plans along with the electrical riser diagram will
be defined indicating the proposed equipment and fixture details, quantities, and locations. The
electrical power riser diagram will be defined consistent with load requirements and voltage drop
calculations. Service entrance requirements will be coordinated with FPL consistent with available
and/or new service configurations and locations.
2.1.5 Dune Vegetation Restoration Design: CGA will prepare initial design plans suitable for
submittal to the DEP illustrating areas of any exotic vegetation removal and proposed dune
vegetation to replace exotics and fill barren areas. Plans will include areas to be vegetated, native
salt-tolerant plant species, and appropriate specifications for planting. After review and conceptual
approval by the DEP, the dune restoration design will be incorporated into the Preliminary
Construction Drawings. This scope of services assumes that there will be no expansion of the
footprint of the dune structure/vegetation limits and may attempt to consider already permitted dune
restoration projects in this area.
2.1.6 Irrigation Design: and thus will eliminate the need for irrigation in those areas. Additionally,
consistent with the direction of the City, irrigation will not be provided on any dune area east of the
proposed paver area. Instead, permanent irrigation will be designed only at park area connections to
the Beachwalk, specifically at 53rd Street Park and Alison Park. The design shall include system
layout, service connections, list of materials and installation details consistent with the other
Page 3 of 8
Beachwalk projects or as directed by City Staff. The system will include controllers, valves, heads,
main and lateral piping, backflow preventers and flow sensors.
2.1.7 Signage Design: The CGA team will provide up design plans for marking and signage to
provide separations between cyclist and pedestrian users of the wider Beachwalk. It is envisioned
that signage will be consistent with the City's adopted Wayfinding standards—the City shall provide
all applicable wayfinding standards for incorporation. All pavement distinctions between pedestrian
and cyclist areas are to be integrated into the hardscape paving design and shall not be in the form of
a roadway pavement thermoplastic, applied or painted-on application. As such, it is anticipated that
pavement striping plans shall not be a part of this project. Signage locations will be identified in the
layout or landscape plans.
2.1.8 Basic Permitting Services: It is anticipated that City of Miami Beach Permits, including Permits
from the Public Works and the Building Departments, will be required for the Project. The City will
prepare applications and process these permits. CGA will assist the City in processing the permits.
CGA will meet with representatives of the City toward securing the required approvals for site and
civil improvements.
2.1.9 Grants of Perpetual Easement: As the proposed layout of the Project shall not meander
landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL) onto upland properties, an easement agreement shall not
be required between privately-owned properties and the City. In the vent that the City requires any
easements for any other purpose related to this project, the City shall be responsible for securing all
necessary easements from the affected property owners. Any coordination between the City and
FDEP regarding any issues regarding easement format or content, although it is generally assumed
that there will not be issues of any significance in this regard, will be conducted under a separate
Additional Services Agreement. The City shall also provide any and all temporary control easements
and perpetual maintenance easements needed for the project. These need to be drafted and
obtained prior to construction and phasing initiation.
2.1.10 DEP Division of State Lands Consent of Use Application and Processing (if necessary, these
shall be performed under a separate Additional Services Agreement):
2.1.10.1 DEP Division of State Lands Consent of Use Application
Regulations may require that a Consent of Use or easement be obtained by any entity (local,
private, commercial) prior to construction or other activities on State-owned lands. All lands east
of the Erosion Control Line are owned by the State of Florida. If the Division of State Lands is not
able to confirm that Consent of Use is provided through an updated City Beachfront Management
Plan, a separate application for Consent must be submitted. If required, CGA will coordinate with
the City to prepare and submit a State Lands Consent of Use request to the DEP Joint Coastal
Permitting (JCP) program.
2.1.10.2 DEP Division of State Lands Consent Processing: CGA will confer with DEP staff to
advise them of the details of proposed construction and identify areas of staff concern. CGA will
maintain telephone contact with the DEP to expedite their review and processing of the Consent
of Use application. CGA will provide a sketch illustrating the general north and south boundaries
of the Consent approval relative to DEP reference monuments. This scope of services assumes
that a surveyed legal description of the boundaries of the Project upon state lands will not be
required, and that a Consent to Use State Lands, rather than easement, will be required/issued.
2.1.11 Permitting with Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission
2.1.11.1 FDEP CCCL Permit: CGA will prepare and assist the City in obtaining a CCCL Permit
for the construction of the project. Towards this effort, CGA will prepare the necessary plans and
specifications to obtain this permit. The City will provide CGA with an executed CCCL permit
application form, a DEP permit application fee (amount to be determined), and a letter from the
Planning and Zoning Department indicating their approval of the project and confirming that the
project"does not contravene local setback requirements, or zoning codes" and "is consistent with
the state-approved local Comprehensive Plan." The City will provide CGA with the relevant legal
descriptions and ownership/control documentation for the proposed Project area. CGA will
prepare and submit a permit application package containing this information, as well as the
Project design plans, for the proposed project.
1.2.11.2 FDEP and FWC Marine Turtle (Lighting) Review: CGA will coordinate with the lighting
and landscaping team members toward obtaining lighting plans, cut sheets, and the lighting table
Page 4 of 8
required by the FDEP and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for review
and approval. CGA will also maintain telephone contact with the FWC to expedite their review
and approval of the proposed exterior lighting. CGA will confer with the team landscape architect,
lighting consultant, and City as to questions, revisions, or additional items that may be required by
the FWC to assist the City in obtaining approval for the proposed exterior lighting. It is assumed
that bollard light fixture (or a very similar model) and bulbs previously approved by the FWC for
the Beachwalk and NBRC Project will be used exclusively for Beachwalk II. It is assumed that no
lights will be proposed that would be visible from the beach (such as fixtures near or seaward of
the dune crest).
2.1.11.3 Additional DEP Meetings: CGA may attend up to two (2) additional meetings, as
needed, in Tallahassee with FDEP staff to review the permit application, re-confirm the
acceptability of specific elements of the design, and facilitate expedited permit processing. This
can be done at the written request of the City and shall be done under a separate Additional
Services Agreement. CGA will prepare Minutes for each meeting documenting the discussions
and summarizing FDEP's acknowledgement of compliance.
2.2 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
2.2.1 30% Preliminary Construction Drawings: Omitted and shall be understood as haven been
fulfilled
2.2.2 60% Construction Drawings
2.2.2.1 CGA will prepare construction plans at approximately the 60% level of completion
illustrating details of the proposed Project. The design drawings will illustrate plan and sectional
views of the improvements and will include details of paving and grading. All path geometry and
elevations will be established, including slopes and ADA considerations and accesses. Minor
drainage design (slopes, swales, etc., but no drainage structures or underground piping) will be
completed as appropriate for the improvements. Revisions to the number of existing dune
crossovers and modifications to sand-on-grade access, and clarification of connections to existing
parks and parking lots will be provided. Design for minor beach structures (such as fences and
showers, etc.) are not a part of this Project. Paving and utility connection (water/electrical) design
will also be developed as required. The plans will incorporate existing conditions and basic design
elements including construction details, decorative details for the path, vegetation, and lighting
and ADA access assurances. The 60% preliminary plans will graphically convey the engineering
and landscape architectural design, and be formatted for a logical sequence of construction.
CGA will submit a complete set of all 60% plans to City Staff for review and comment relative to
compliance with City Standards. Any significant design changes made to the plan set during this
phase of services by the City or a regulatory agency will be addressed under a separate scope of
services.
2.2.2.2 Updated Cost Opinion: The opinion of probable construction cost will be revised and
submitted with the design submittal package.
2.2.2.3 Preliminary Technical Specifications: CGA will prepare preliminary technical
specifications in the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) format for the Divisions 2-16
specifications required for the construction plans. The City will be responsible for all "up-front" bid
package documents such as General Conditions, Construction Contracts, and Division 1
specifications, etc.
2.2.2.4 60% Plans Review: Drawings will be presented to the City for processing through
various City Departments. The City shall be responsible for coordinating and routing all plans
through the various departments to obtain input. City shall coordinate a review by various City-
departments and collect all comments from the various departments. CGA will attend one (1)
meeting with City Staff to review all comments and obtain direction for further development to be
reflected in 90% plans, particularly to address any conflicting comments and to move the process
forward. It is expected that to obtain clear direction on how to resolve potentially conflicting
comments as issued by different City Departments, various department representatives will
attend the meeting.
2.2.2.5 FDEP CCCL Permit Application Submission and Permit Processing: CGA will submit the
necessary plans and specification to obtain and process a CCCL Permit with the FDEP. CGA will
address any comments issued by the agency. Any significant design changes made after
Page 5 of 8
submittal of the permit application will be considered a change in scope. Significant design
changes include, but are not limited to, the enlargement of footprint, addition of structures
seaward of the CCCL, relocating structures farther seaward, or new activities. CGA will confer
with FDEP staff to advise them of the details of the proposed construction and to identify areas of
staff concern. CGA will maintain telephone contact with the FDEP to expedite their review and
processing of the permit application. CGA will review available working drawings to ensure their
compliance with FDEP criteria toward expediting the FDEP Final Order. In addition, CGA will
confer with the team members and City as to questions, revisions, or additional items that may be
required by the FDEP and will represent the Project before FDEP staff to assist the City in
securing a FDEP Permit(Final Order)for the proposed Project.
2.2.2.6 FDEP and FWC Marine Turtle (Lighting) Review: CGA will submit the necessary plans
and specification to obtain and process all lighting-related permits with the FDEP. Application
permits fees will be the responsibility of the City. CGA will address any comments issued by the
agency.
2.2.2.7 FDOT ERC Comments Processing: CGA will address comments issued by FDOT
through their ERC system to meet any commitments between the City and FDOT as a condition
of any funding allocations.
2.2.3 90% Final Construction Drawings
2.2.3.1 CGA will incorporate comments and agreed-upon resolutions from the City's review of
the 60% Final Construction Drawing plans and the comments review meeting into the final
construction drawings. A subsequent submittal of the design plans will be made to the City at the
100% level of completion. It is anticipated that the review comments from the 90% level drawings
will be minor in nature. The drawings will be prepared with industry-accepted guidelines for the
production of construction drawings on 24"x36"sheets at appropriate scales.
2.2.3.2 Revised Cost Opinion: The opinion of probable construction cost will be revised and
submitted with the design submittal package.
2.2.3.3 Revised Technical Specifications: The CGA Team will develop revised Technical
Specifications to reflect construction and installation specifications for all planned components,
particularly with an attention to criteria necessary to address.
2.2.3.4 90% Plans Review: Drawings will be presented to the City for processing through
various City Departments. The City shall be responsible for coordinating and routing all plans
through the various departments to obtain input. City shall coordinate a review by various City-
departments and collect all comments from the various departments. CGA will attend one (1)
meeting with City Staff to review all comments and obtain direction for further development to be
reflected in 90% plans, particularly to address any conflicting comments and to move the process
forward. It is expected that to obtain clear direction on how to resolve potentially conflicting
comments as issued by different City Departments, various department representatives will
attend the meeting.
2.2.3.5 FDEP CCCL Permit Application Submission and Permit Processing: CGA will submit the
necessary plans and specification to obtain and process a CCCL Permit with the FDEP. CGA will
address any comments issued by the agency. Any significant design changes made after
submittal of the permit application will be considered a change in scope. Significant design
changes include, but are not limited to, the enlargement of footprint, addition of structures
seaward of the CCCL, relocating structures farther seaward, or new activities. CGA will confer
with FDEP staff to advise them of the details of the proposed construction and to identify areas of
staff concern. CGA will maintain telephone contact with the FDEP to expedite their review and
processing of the permit application. CGA will review available working drawings to ensure their
compliance with FDEP criteria toward expediting the FDEP Final Order. In addition, CGA will
confer with the team members and City as to questions, revisions, or additional items that may be
required by the FDEP and will represent the Project before FDEP staff to assist the City in
securing a FDEP Permit(Final Order)for the proposed Project.
2.2.3.6 FDEP and FWC Marine Turtle (Lighting) Review CGA will submit the necessary plans
and specification to obtain and process all lighting-related permits with the FDEP. Application
permits fees will be the responsibility of the City. CGA will address any comments issued by the
agency.
Page 6 of 8
2.2.3.7 FDOT ERC Comments Processing: CGA will address comments issued by FDOT
through their ERC system to meet any commitments between the City and FDOT as a condition
of any funding allocations.
2.2.4 100% Final Construction Drawings
2.2.4.1 CGA will incorporate comments and agreed-upon resolutions from the City's review of
the 90% Final Construction Drawing plans and the comments review meeting into the final
construction drawings. It is anticipated that comments or directives for revisions will be completed
and the scope to develop the design drawings shall be considered finalized. Any additional or
subsequent submittals of the design plans shall be made under a separate additional services
agreement. The drawings will be prepared with industry-accepted guidelines for the production of
construction drawings on 24"x36" sheets at appropriate scales. Final 100% Construction
Drawings will be sealed by Florida Registered Landscape Architect or a Professional Engineer,
as appropriate.
Deliverables: Five(5) hard copies of 100% Final Construction drawings.
2.2.4.2 Final Cost Opinion: The opinion of probable construction cost will be finalized and
submitted with the final submittal package.
2.2.4.3 Final Technical Specifications: The CGA Team will finalize the Technical Specifications
to reflect construction and installation specifications for all planned components, particularly with
an attention to criteria necessary to address.
2.2.4.4 Pre-Construction FDEP Conference: Subsequent to issuance of the FDEP Notice to
Proceed, the CGA permitting project manager will schedule and attend one (1) Pre-Construction
Conference with the FDEP Field Representative, City, Contractor, and Project team members, as
required in the Special Permit Conditions outlined in the Final Order.
PART 3— BIDDING AND AWARD SERVICES— Not included in this ASA; shall be ruled by the terms of
the original contract under the section titled Part 3—Bidding and Award Services.
PART 4—CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES—Not included in this ASA; shall be ruled by
the terms of the original contract under the section titled Part 4—Construction Administration Services.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (Consistent with original contract):
Reproduction, transmissions, photocopies, telephone calls, airfare, travel, and other direct expenses
related to the performance of this contract will be invoiced pursuant to the attached Schedules B and C.
GENERAL CONDITIONS/ASSUMPTIONS (Consistent with original contract):
1. Design drawings created in AutoCAD will be provided to the City in electronic format.
2. It is assumed that the Project will be designed with minimal impact to the beach-dune system —this
includes siting landward of the dune profile and vegetation wherever possible, maintenance of
existing beach access corridors (or reduction of beach access points if appropriate to reduce dune
breach frequency), etc. It is assumed that no structures will be proposed seaward of the 30-year
erosion projection that are not in support of the erosion control function of the project, and that no
major structures will be proposed seaward of the DEP 30-year erosion projection. It assumed that no
major structures such as bathrooms, walls, concrete pads greater than 100 square feet, etc. will be
proposed as part of the Project.
3. Major design changes after the completion of the Final Conceptual Design as confirmed by the City
after review of the Conceptual Design Report or the 30% set of preliminary construction drawings will
be negotiated under a separate scope of services. For the purposes of this agreement, a "major"
change would be a total increase or decrease greater than 10% of the total design.
4. CGA is not responsible for any change in the scope of services that may be incurred due to
circumstances beyond our control, including, but not limited to, changes in regulations and other legal
actions.
5. It is assumed that the Project can be designed as self-mitigating — i.e. that there will be a net benefit
to the beach/dune systems through the proposed addition of fill and native vegetation, and that all
exotic vegetation is to be removed. If additional mitigation is required by the FDEP, this additional
design and negotiation will be provided under a separate scope.
Page 7 of 8
6. The schedule for construction is assumed to be approximately 9 months. Any rebid process or
extended construction schedule will require services to be provided under a separate scope.
7. The following items are not included in the scope of services presented herein:
7.1. Meetings or other coordination associated with the Beachfront Management Plan updates
7.2. Street-End, streetscape and associated utilities
7.3. Design of retaining walls, bathrooms, cafes, or other major structures with substantial
foundations
7.4. Revisions to riparian property access points based on modifications to those riparian
properties
7.5. Transportation planning
7.6. Aerial Photography or Planimetric Mapping
7.7. Public outreach, hearings, meetings, or workshops
7.8. Environmental testing or engineering
7.9. Geotechnical analysis and related sediment quality coordination with FDEP or other agency
staff regarding sand proposed to be brought onsite for fill
7.10. Illustrative renderings or Model building
7.11. FEMA consultations
7.12. FDEP Permit Modifications(major or minor)
7.13. FDEP Partial Notices to Proceed
7.14. FDEP Field Permits
7.15. FDEP Permit Time Extensions
7.16. FDEP or MD-PERA(former DERM) Permits for Stormwater Drainage System Modifications
7.17. MD-PERA Tree Removal Permits
Page 8 of 8
SCHEDULE B1
SUMMARY OF COSTS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
FEES
REQUIRED TO LABOR LABOR
DESCRIPTION ._ COMPLETE FEES FEES FOR
REDESIGN OF REMAINING THIS ASA
THE PROJECT
PART 2—DESIGN SERVICES
2.1 — Landscape Architectural and Engineering Services $24,160.50 $7,832.51 $16,327.99
2.2 — Construction Drawings and Specifications $72,481.50 $25,688.61 $46,792.89
2.3 — Permitting $42,554.00 $27,440.65 $15,113.35
FEES TOTAL $78,234.23
ESTIMATED REIMBURSIBLE EXPENSE BUDGET $3,900.00
Oo 'o' 0000000000 a ,80000000000 'o 8000000000 ,-o '0: .M2
o0 0. 8000000000 0 - 88888000000 0 0000000000 0 0 �. N
1 00 0• 000000000o o 00000000000 a 6666666666 . .. ,��;�
Q N 01 b WW _ N: O) t0 W. N py N
J
cif tD ri vi Oi Pi .t�l• O O O
N N to t0 ") - (fl' p fA t�! Cl .0'm
..'Q N �,'1 p p p Vl fR • fA p E.fA
,'-� O O G O O O O O O O O O
` o Ir V Q Q O Q-
Q m
S• m m O N -
O i N N m
`• ■F.
tarl:. '!I 0 88'
v o 00 e 38:0
O o o 0•v o ;3-.6
o
y
; Q Q: .Q 01 Q A
ei ti0"S• ti3
m .
-p p p pp' t
,
C 1.N O O ,c.-.,',
�
•
,I O O O O O O
.6. O O 0,'
` i m0 .
W 2,
, NG O • i
F.47 ;41' t •
p w p
W, A`2 _
i,'.,„
'
n •i O O OO O O O O O O O O Z
m O m�V. r w . m. .m I.
C f N N 1 ,.L
Q n_ .: _
~: p p
p
--I to •
�
L. �„ •1 O O O 08 • O O O. O O O 0 0 •'-O * •
Q O m 0 Q Q O: t. N m m N N
... , N Q N m� N caw r r t'7� �. "
1
f•�`" • 'j 0 00. 88 00 0 0 00jo
4 ' o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro o
m 66 Q m N O' m t7 O)(7• .16
•
`jag+S: 1 m r N Q' N' N en
yet ,2 ,
It—�-' 1 p p M p 'f9
1 S� O OO• OO O O OO 101 bx
r. �dl �I 0 00 00 00, 0 0 00 ,or
}.w:�q='1 I 0 tm N to m o` ra of of n1 I
11 I "N. N `.�7
t__ O N' O•
m C` t• O 0 0- 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O,
..
IC rC<r 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 io
��N;"• m m 6 .m N 00,E t0 V O N t ai ai
I. _- Z .w .p p■ w i�p
0 0 00 00 og ::3'i Oo to
Io 0 00 o0 00 00 0� ; •
'
' I�
i
; p p
V'. 4 I 8 8
m 0 08 a 00
8 8 00 on
O Q N mN f COI
_ ` .'C ! QIN
co I A1
N 1 I N `t•])• `,
._ '-9 I .. p p p
Ip`-
W _ - O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1 0 1
- -
tG < O o Q o: N tD O m 8 t0'
N .1, - t") co, N �^ N Nom. c7 (0 O m�'
O to
If ` _ I . p W r N 1.1 p.
1 I
A ' O 0O 00 00 O O 00 IO O
,. . r N N r G m N m O N Q 44°...•
y .. M ,01
N V Wt,:
p, p p p t p•
lD m>rp
NN O 88 88 0 0 tO O 0 0, '=8
+
e a m G. 8 m 8• 8 Q ,C
,�S�a..
N
�i .p p p p A..'t'
W C yS C" o O O 0 88 0 0 O O 88 "O
,
3-j m :-e - m b g O O m m G m.
O yfgEl r • ih N r
O
7....,.. _ W p
p 0 A
•
1 I , 8 0 00 00 00 80 o
C g H N r Q N p m
Q ° m b .m
al, o I
-
N N .7 1 - .1:.
S''_ p p t'. to p fA
i _ f'
O O O O O O O O O O O O
, •
OC • . m 0 r ' Q Q O V Q m m O'
-m N 1n m m rn
`-C4 N
,
O O 00 Q Q O Q O Q O fir
hO 1
•
W O O O O O N O •
r N r O OQ Q r O O O 80 7..
N m g g
m .t
ii . U«
• p • p p p pt.I
1
T O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - .O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - J
Z m O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-,
A tiJ N O O O ^O 10 N O O O O O ui,i m t7 th t7 10 O s O O N N m •O a. NO m tnN000m2a2 mN NN mmin mm mr t010N000xs22 - 4
= 19p 1 ptAptA fA F9pp pp 'ppfA fgppbf t9 fA IA fA- pf9 fA b9 fl9 tAptA fA fA
1
u•
L7.. • . L.1 -
O 0 _ 0. •
o . gm m
'
r;
m
N N m :11'. m •'Ce •
mo • �> m Ti m A U 27 `.2 13
N
s o U m 3 m 7.-FU w 0 Lma =m =2- V c `m 11.1 13'Q
l'-', a .5.-„-.,m ..2.E'S c c`8 .0 n c d.V~ o,c-c` L'c rn—
L _V mm X30.,a n 0 y of d m U mo mm=v L m _U`s m �Z . Vo w c m cv g,m y c g m t c y a<.�o¢< y^m c m m c c m m gm c 3'm a d` 3
L .2 mSm m0'rnm'=-,0="0'v.m2.. J�mQ=U=50i_oy L Ef rn.gm__=Oc.m2 :15 76! 1 3
u U
m o p 1 Cm W Cm m0m o.N.. mm 92a C nan.__°_ Wm W Cm, —mQ L vH3Y T? :K F
mm. caaHg w�oF-mmg?'-22'g?' 2.m 1RIUomRV,y.gq ;1 1c�oQ1 qq m m; t
v¢ a_c
m>> > o ai rn W c a m>> c w c,..o'i-o>.o c c m>> ,9 E o ai'w W•c.�m>o, g g' 'o •j'.
0 8'.'.x y y a._ c c m O m z 0 N m m c m c m c m m m><y y c m<m N(A U-0 I ,7
c� v<n.w t�¢oaww=,mc�aw . '� ww�w�w���w waoaww�tnc�a.w _,., _ O
SCHEDULE E
ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE
MIDDLE BEACH RECREATIONAL CORRIDOR, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
Duration
Task Name (Working Start End Notes
Days) Date Date
PART 2—DESIGN SERVICES
2.2 — Construction Drawings and Specifications
2.2.2 — 60%Final Construction Drawings
2.2.2.1 — 60%Final Construction Drawing Plans 40
2.2.2.2 — Updated Cost Opinion 4
2.2.2.3 — Preliminary Technical Specifications ! 5
2.2.2.4 — 60%Comments Review Meeting 2 Milestone
2.2.2.5 — FDEP CCCL Permit Application Submission and Permit Processing 3
2.2.2.6 — FDEP and FWC Marine Turtle(Lighting)Review 1
2.2.2.7 — FDOT ERC Comments Processing 4
2.2.3 — 90%Final Construction Drawings
2.2.3.1 — 90%Final Construction Drawing Plans 20
r
2.2.3.2 — Revised Cost Opinion 4 _
2.2.3.3 — Revised Technical Specifications 5
2.2.3.4 — 90%Comments Review Meeting _ _ 2 Milestone
2.2.3.5 — FDEP CCCL Permit Application Submission and Permit Processing 3 _,
2.2.3.6 — FDEP and FWC Marine Turtle(Lighting)Review 1
2.2.3.7 — FDOT ERC Comments Processing 4
2.2.4 — 100%Final Construction Drawing Plans
2.2.4.1 — Final 100%Construction Drawings 8 ^_
2.2.4.2 — Final Cost Opinion 5
2.2.4.3 — Final Technical Specifications 4 _ Milestone
2.2.4.4 — Pre-Construction DEP Conference 1 1 1Milestone
OVERALL TOTAL 117 days (24 weeks)
NOTE This schedule represents approxiamte working days needed to complete the items described. It does not,however,account for time
needed or spent by any agency or department to review the plans and provide comment,as these are beyond of the control of Calvin,
Giordano&Associates,Inc.
I