The URL can be used to link to this page

Agreement with the Image Network, Inc., of Delaware D/B/A Dover, Kohl, & Partners MAM1BEACH AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE IMAGE NETWORK, INC., OF DELAWARE D/B/A DOVER, KOHL, & PARTNERS FOR MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT Resolution No. 2015-28990 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 16 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 17 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 18 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 19 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 20 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 21 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 22 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 23 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 23 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 24 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 24 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A - SCOPE OF SERVICES 30 SCHEDULE B - CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 31 SCHEDULE C - CONSULTANT HOURLY BILLING RATE 32 SCHEDULE D - INSURANCE CERTIFICATE 33 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A- Resolution, Commission Item, and Commission Mem 34 ATTACHMENT B - Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 35 ATTACHMENT C - Consultant's Response to the RFQ 36 Page 2 of 36 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE IMAGE NETWORK, INC., OF DELAWARE D/B/A DOVER, KOHL, & PARTNERS FOR FOR MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT This Agreement made and entered into this _ day of , 2015 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners, a Delaware Corporation having its principal office at 1571 Sunset Drive Coral Gables, FL 33143 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. Page 3 of 36 The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for Qualifications No. 2015-086-YG, entitled "Master Planner of the North Beach District" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), (the RFQ), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the master planner who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub-consultants retained by Consultant for a Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub- consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: The Street Plans Collaborative ARCADIS, US; Goodkin Consulting; JSK Architecture Group. Chen Moore & Associates Page 4 of 36 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR: The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to a Project. 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete a Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition, any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto, (and as same may be modified by any approved change orders, contract amendments or additional services). 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: [Intentionally Omitted] 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: [Intentionally Omitted] 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: [Intentionally Omitted] For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the Page 5 of 36 parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto. The Contract Documents may also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, approved change order(s), approved construction change directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: [Intentionally Omitted] 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: [Intentionally Omitted] 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or the City Manager if they are fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as Page 6 of 36 amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than fifty thousand ($50,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to a Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional-Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A — Scope of Services. Schedule B — Consultant Compensation. Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D — Insurance Certificate ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 [Intentionally Omitted] Page 7 of 36 2.3 As it relates to the Services and a Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which a Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services to be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of the development of the North Beach District Master Plan vision in the following three (3) phases PHASE 1: Review, Inventory & Assessment of Existing Conditions: As part of Phase 1, Consultant will coordinate with City staff to establish a steering committee made up of key individuals that will help guide the development of the master plan. This will include the review of all relevant information including previous plans and studies and background information on the North Beach District supplied by the City, as well as the inventory and analysis of urban design, land use, building conditions, building heights, building locations, density and/or intensity of development, the condition of the built environment, and transportation issues that affect the Master Plan area. PHASE 2: Create the Master Plan Area Vision: This phase will involve the creation of the future vision for the Master Plan Area in accordance with public input and stakeholder involvement during an intensive, weeklong planning Charrette held on-site in North Beach at a location to be determined with City Staff. PHASE 3: Final Master Plan and Recommendations: This phase includes recommendations, revisions and completion of the Master Plan Document, and public presentations of the final Plan. Page 8 of 36 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of a Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties and shall be in effect until such time as the Project is completed. Notwithstanding, the City Manager may extend the Term; but any such extension, if granted at all, shall be at the Manager's sole discretion. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services will be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Project Timeline in Schedule "A" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Timeline, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Timeline; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Timeline. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate Page 9 of 36 the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on a Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to the City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of Services by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such Services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub-consultant's Services. 2.9.1 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work and/or services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. Page 10 of 36 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a Purchase Order, a qualified professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his/her designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his/her designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). Page 11 of 36 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non- public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his/her designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete its work on the Project. If, during the course of performing the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete its work on the Project, and which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services and deemed included as a Basic Service under (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: [Intentionally Omitted] 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub-consultants, which Page 12 of 36 • shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his/her designee, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Services described in this Agreement; b) the Term of this Agreement; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. Page 13 of 36 excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, of this Agreement. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by Page 14 of 36 the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4[Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Page 15 of 36 Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 [Intentionally Omitted] 4.2 [Intentionally Omitted] 4.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 4.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 4.5 [Intentionally Omitted] ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services, at the sole discretion of the City, shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a fee (to be mutually agreed upon by the parties), with a "Not to Exceed" amount. "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative fees allowable which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested. 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts. Page 16 of 36 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Schedule B — Consultant Compensation includes allowances for any and all reimbursable expenses allowed by the City. Notwithstanding, the City may require and the Consultant may provide additional reimbursables only as outlined in this section. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for design, deliverables and community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 6.2.4 Travel expenses for the project including airfare, hotel, taxis and meals. 6.2.5 Long distance phone calls for the project. ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" fee for provision of the Services, as set forth in Exhibit B, shall not exceed $285,000. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made in accordance with the invoicing schedule set forth in Exhibit B and within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed Page 17 of 36 on subcontracted work. 7.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: [Intentionally Omitted] 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7.2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the Page 18 of 36 address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours upon reasonable prior written notice. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be agreed upon at a later date to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. Page 19 of 36 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner: In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to Page 20 of 36 the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or Y P Y Y Y pY delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: Page 21 of 36 (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance for all employees of the vendor as required by Florida Statute 440. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $2,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator thirty (30) days' notice of cancellation in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement (or otherwise provided by Consultant) shall in no way limit its Page 22 of 36 responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds $10,000, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of Page 23 of 36 contract to be limited to $10,000, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess $10,000, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: Tourism, Culture, & Economic Development Economic Development Division City of Miami Beach 1755 Meridian Avenue, Suite 500 Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jeff L. Oris, Director All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl, & Partners 1571 Sunset Drive Coral Gables, FL 33143 Attn: Hernan Guerrero All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement Page 24 of 36 because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information Page 25 of 36 made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional Page 26 of 36 services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. Page 27 of 36 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. Page 28 of 36 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: i ■111 . 6 ,/ /,'"' FAEL E. GRANADvei ' C11 "1144, PHILIP LEVI ).//• OR jrNs ,...7................Ie.% 113./. ) ' ..--.5°0 0 INCORF ORATED * 1_,THE IMAGE Jd ETWORK, INC., OF DELAWARE hi D/B/A DOVER, KOHL, & PARTNERS .......:,h1 ', , N Attest % 'i ,H e- r� e / k Sig t re/Secretary Signature/President �.,=-9"- 4 . 16/4-u, se u i vi crop. e. .Dovetz.r fiefs/Derr- Print Name/Title Print Name/Title APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE EXECUTION &FOR t1tYAttOY Date Page 29 of 36 SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES Page 30 of 36 DJVER, KOHL t o w n p l a n n i n g August 19,2015 Alex Denis, Director Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 RE: RFQ 201 5-086-YG MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT Dear Members of the Evaluation Committee: We have changed our cost proposal to reflect the City Commission's request to add the Economic Analysis and Report for the Town Center and Economic Analysis for the West Lots.Given the amount of public input that has already happened to date,we look forward to expediting this process based on staff and steering committee guidance.Thank you for your input. The enclosed proposal outlines the overall strategy for the development of the Master Plan vision in three phases,followed by a Project Timeline,and a cost proposal.You may contact me or Hernan Guerrero,Project Director,at 305-666-0446,if you have any questions. Thank you for the opportunity;we look forward to working with you. Sincerely yours, DOER, KOHL & PARTNERS son King, A_1 U-A Vinci•a/& eni• ° •sect Director jki ;��doverkohl.com 1 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 201 5-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District PROJECT PROPOSAL The following proposal outlines our recommended approach for creating the North Miami Beach Master Plan. How this Proposal is Structured The enclosed proposal outlines the overall strategy for the development of the Master Plan vision in three phases, followed by a Project Timeline, three Fee Proposals and a Tier Comparison sheet. Please refer to the fee proposal and fee comparison sheets for reference as to the level of analysis and deliverables included in each tier. PHASE 1: Review, Inventory &Assessment of Existing Conditions: As part of Phase 1, Dover-Kohl will coordinate with City of Miami Beach staff to establish a steering committee made up of key individuals that will help guide the development of the master plan. This will include the review of all relevant information including previous plans and studies and background information on the North Beach District supplied by the City, as well as the inventory and analysis of urban design, land use, building conditions, building heights, building locations, density and/or intensity of development, the condition of the built environment, and transportation issues that affect the Master Plan area. PHASE 2: Create the Master Plan Area Vision: This phase will involve the creation of the future vision for the Master Plan Area in accordance with public input and stakeholder involvement during an intensive, week- long planning Charrette held on-site in North Beach at a location to be determined with City Staff. PHASE 3: Final Master Plan and Recommendations: This phase includes recommendations, revisions and completion of the Master Plan Document, and public presentations of the final Plan. 2 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District PHASE 1 : REVIEW, INVENTORY &ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS I MONTHS 1-5 Phase I will include the review of all relevant information including previous plans and studies and background information on the North Beach District supplied by the City, as well as the inventory and analysis of urban design, land use, building conditions, density and/or intensity of development, historic preservation, transportation and sea level rise issues that affect the Master Plan area. It will include meetings with the City staff, the public, stakeholder interviews, meetings with steering committee and on-site analysis by Dover-Kohl team members. Preliminary Conference Call PHASE 1: At the start of the project, a Principal and Project Director from DELIVERABLES Dover-Kohl will schedule a conference call or meeting with City staff to review base information needs, identify stakeholders, and strategize on the public participation process. 1. Analysis maps 2. Text &graphics for planning Review of Existing Plans SL Studies process advertisements The team will become familiar with the details of previous plans, 3. Project information for studies, and regulating documents related to the master plan area and website surrounding parts of North Beach including background information 4. Social media materials on the district supplied by the City, and other studies including the Intensity Increase Study, the Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan, the North Beach Town Center, and others. These plans and studies will be assessed to their current applicability to the master plan study area and how they will affect future outcomes in the area. Documentation of Neighborhood Character The team will survey the study area, coordinate with City staff and the public to identify buildings, stylistic elements and locations symbolic of the study area. This survey will be included as part of the Site Visit Report and can inform the development of specific design guidelines or suggestions that can be include in the final Master Plan. Analysis Maps The team will utilize ArcMap GIS or similar base data mapping service, aerial and ground level photography, land use surveys, and expertise provided by the City to acquire the necessary information to create a series of Analysis Maps for the plan study area. Information to be mapped may include existing land uses, open space, zoning, planned land uses, utility easements, property boundaries, ownership, topography, natural resources, environmental conditions including floodplains, cultural and historic resources, existing vacant or underutilized buildings, building height as well as buildings available for adaptive reuse, and a transportation system map. Maps will be field verified during an initial site visit. Utilizing this information Dover-Kohl will produce base maps of the planning area to be used throughout the Charrette in Phase 2 by the design team and members of the public. Public Outreach Dover-Kohl and City staff will strategize on the best mechanisms for outreach to individuals and groups. A strategy for soliciting community input, and establishing on-going public outreach throughout the process will be addressed. Dover-Kohl will assist in the design of flyers, posters, banners, postcards, mailers, and press releases to be distributed to the media, neighborhood associations, business associations, and community organizations (among others). Throughout the planning process Dover-Kohl will provide information for the City of Miami Beach's website and updates can be posted on a project Facebook page to keep the community informed of public meetings and help them follow the planning process. Information to be provided will include project updates, photographs, maps, renderings, images, and other submitted deliverables. Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District Initial Site Visit Key members of the Dover-Kohl team will conduct a 2 to 3 day site visit in North Beach. The team will work closely with City staff and will conduct initial interviews with key stakeholders. Descriptions of tasks that can be completed during the site visit are as follows: Project Initiation Meeting The Dover-Kohl team will meet with City staff to refine the goals and objectives of the planning process. Together we will review the existing characteristics of the Master Plan Area including information compiled to create analysis maps. Key elements and recommendations from existing plans and reports that affect the study area will be discussed as to their relevance with the future potential for the Master Plan Area. From these discussions key issues, opportunities, and constraints for the Master Plan Area will be outlined. Initial planning principles and objectives for the area will be developed. These planning principles will later be explored and tested against the publics' desires during Phase 2 of the planning process. Stakeholder Meetings, Interviews &Meetings with Staff The team will hold additional meetings during the site visit with key stakeholders including property owners, community groups, and other local stakeholders to discuss their goals and objectives for the Master Plan. gr' P � g objectives Tour Dover-Kohl will tour and examine the existing urban form and analyze the network of streets, blocks and lots, building types, and building patterns with City staff. The analysis will include a review of the existing land use, density, transportation issues, existing streetscape characteristics, urban design elements, and development issues affecting the study area. The team will assess, measure, and document existing building types, building placement relative to the street, building massing, scale, height, primary facade transparency, density and intensity of land use including vertical and horizontal mixing, sidewalks, plantings, lighting, signage, spacial enclosure, and level of street life activity. Kick-Off Press Conference (Optional) Dover-Kohl will be available to participate in a press conference along with the City to inform the community of the upcoming public planning process. PHASE 2: CREATE THE MASTER PLAN AREA VISION I MONTH 6 The centerpiece of Phase 2 will be the creation of the future vision for the Master Plan Area in accordance with public input and stakeholder involvement during an intensive, roughly week-long planning Charrette held on-site in North Beach at locations to be determined with City Staff. J During the Charrette, Dover-Kohl will lead a series of public meetings, design sessions, stakeholder interviews, and technical meetings to quickly engage the community and form the framework for the Plan, including physical design features, transportation, infrastructure, housing, historic preservation, sustainability and resilient redevelopment goals and objectives along with the community's values and aspirations for the plan area. The hands-on nature of the Charrette and the opportunity to interact with differing perspectives allows issues to be quickly identified and resolved. City staff and officials will be involved throughout the week at various meetings,workshops, and presentations. Updates will be provided to the project website and Facebook page periodically throughout the charrette. 4 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District Design the Charrette Format Dover-Kohl will work with City Staff to structure the format of the charrette to best meet the needs of the com- munity. Emphasis will be placed on establishing a community vision for the plan area, and creating methods to make that vision a reality The charrette will include multiple opportunities for people to offer input, including small group conversations, exit surveys, keypad polling, one word cards, and one-on-one conversations. A preliminary format for the charrette follows. PHASE 2: Charrette DELIVERABLES On mutually agreeable dates, the entire Dover-Kohl team will be in North Beach to work on-site with the community for a charrette. Given the seasonal nature of Miami Beach we recommend hosting 1. Detailed Charrette Schedule the Charrette after the Columbus Day weekend holiday (October 12) 2. Base Maps of Plan Area i when most of North Beach's residents are back on the island. Ideally, 3. "Food-for-Thought" i all major project meetings will occur after Columbus Day to ensure Presentation the maximum possible public involvement. 4. Exit surveys for Hand-on Session J The following tasks will be completed during the charrette: 5. Exit survey results for Hand- on Session Symposium 6. Detailed Draft Illustrative On or before the first day of the Charrette, Dover-Kohl will organize Plan of Plan Area an event structured in a lecture format with time for questions and 7. Visualizations/Change-over- answers. The symposium will allow North Beach stakeholders to hear Time Sequences national experts present best practices on topics such as transporta- tion, economic development, sustainability and revitalization. This 8. Analysis & ' will inspire participants to think about the issues they are interested Recommendations within the context of what makes the most sense for the future of 9. Project update information North Beach overall. for website 10.Facebook Page Update Kick-off Event &Hands-on Design Session 11."Work-in-Progress" On the first official day of the charrette, Dover-Kohl will lead a Presentation Community Kick-off Event to mark the official start of the public 12.Exit survey for Work-in- planning process. The event will feature a "Food For Thought" pre- Progress sentation to educate the public on best practices in mixed-use, mixed- 13.Exit survey results for income development, livable transportation, traditional urban design, Work-in-Progress sustainability, community character, and adaptation to sea level rise, 14.Keypad polling results especially how they apply to peer beach communities with a large tourist industry. In addition, the inventory and analysis of existing conditions will be presented to the public to inform and educate them on the numerous planning challenges that must be dealt with during the planning process. Following the Kick-off Presentation, the meeting will transition to the Hands-on Design Session. Participants will divide into small table groups around the room, oriented to base maps of the plan area, and a set ground rules and goals for the session will be laid out. Each table will have a facilitator from the Dover-Kohl team or City staff to assist participants in a number of design exercises. During the first part of the table sessions, the community will identify the important issues associated with the future of the master plan area and discuss them in small groups. Participants will then continue to work together and draw on base maps to illustrate how they might like to see the area evolve in the future by describing the uses, open spaces, building design and type, landscaping, street design, housing options, parking, and services, as well as key transportation concerns. 5 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District At the end of the workshop, a spokesperson from each table will report the findings and major points to the entire assembly. The goal of the Hands-on Design Session is to forge a community consensus and develop a short- and long-range vision for the future of the study area. Keypad polling, exit surveys, and one word cards may be incorporated throughout the event to calculate and present public opinion on selected topics identified during Phase 1. Open Design Studio Following the Hands-on Design Session, the planning team will set-up an Open Design Studio, preferably in a storefront location in or near the master plan area for the duration of the Charrette week. The team will work on-site to integrate the information gathered during the analysis of existing conditions phase and Initial Site Visit with the input gained during the Hands-on Design Session to create an overall vision for the area while continuing to gather community input. Key stakeholders, City staff and the community will be encouraged to stop in throughout the week as new issues come to mind and to check on the project's status.The following tasks will be completed in the Open Design Studio: Technical Meetings While working on-site, the Dover-Kohl team will lead technical meetings with government agencies and local experts to address housing, open space, mobility, historic preservation, sea level rise and other,rele- vant topics. The purpose of these meetings is to review the emerging vision and receive immediate focused feedback from all stakeholders. Additional meetings with key stakeholders such as property owners, devel- opers, neighborhood associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel and local merchants may be held to ensure their plan objectives are reflected in the overall plan. Draft Illustrative Plan During the Charrette week, the design team will create an illustrative plan illustrating urban design char- acteristics such as massing, density and land use, transportation options, open space and recreation, and economic development opportunities. Scenarios will likely include varying degrees of density, intensity, and building variety. While the master plan is being developed issues concerning the growth of the district and development will be addressed and solutions studied. The assessment of the current built environment begun during Phase I will test existing regulations as they address the interface between different land uses, the surrounding neighborhoods, and current built conditions. Visualizations Visualizing change is a key component of Dover-Kohl's planning methodology. Illustrations often com- municate ideas better than words, and are valuable tools to test or confirm plan concepts and gather meaningful input. Illustrations, ground level and aerial perspective drawings, and diagrams that present emerging planning concepts will be created in the Open Design Studio to obtain immediate feedback from City staff and the community. Visualizations will provide "change over time" sequences of infill proposals, redevelopment strategies, and streetscape improvements. The draft Illustrative Plan and Visualizations will be accessible throughout the week to allow casual feedback, and will be presented at the end of the week for more formal community input. Transportation Analysis Street Plans Collaborative will examine transportation opportunities throughout the Master Plan Area and how they connect to the surrounding community from the perspective of all modes of travel: walk- ing, biking, transit, and driving. This holistic approach to transportation needs will reveal. new methods of recovering lost connections. The transportation analysis will inform improved pedestrian and vehicular 6 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District connectivity, improved access to open spaces and the beach, and streetscape improvements. Transportation improvement strategies will be integrated with streetscape design, based on the belief that successful streets have a duel role of moving people and providing great addresses. Team members Chen Moore will can assist with transportation or civil engineering specific concerns related to transportation. Work-in-Progress Presentation At the conclusion of the Charrette, the planning team will present the week's work at a "Work-in-Progress" presentation. At this presentation, the team will present ideas generated for the Plan including the draft Illustrative Plan and Visualizations. A summary of transportation, revitalization and housing strategies will be presented, highlighting the opportunities for quality development. During the Work-in-Progress presentation, keypad polling will be utilized in order to generate real-time survey results and opinion polls from members of the audience. We can track response information and view results during the presentation. Keypad polling can help us understand if the plan is on the right-track. PHASE 3 - FINAL MASTER PLAN & RECOMMENDATIONS I MONTHS 7 - 12 The draft illustrative plan, visualizations, and transportation concepts begun during the Charrette will be refined to best illustrate the community's short- and long-term goals for the Master Plan Area. Graphics and text will be used to demonstrate the common vision and show what is possible by describing the mix of uses, building types, transitions to the surrounding neighborhoods, and street details. Refine Illustrative Plan &Visualizations The Illustrative Plan will be refined.based on feedback received from City staff, elected officials and the public following the Work-in-Progress presentation. The illustrative plan will illustrate both short- and long-term g � P P g development prospects and will designate development intensity and the appropriate mix of uses. The team will also refine the numerous visualizations, based on input received after the Work-in-Progress pre- sentation and in the following weeks. Renderings of key design concepts will demonstrate the possibilities for future development as well as suggested recommendations for height, scale and scope of building construction that will be proposed in new regulations. Recommendations & Implementation Based on the preferred vision for the community, recommendations and implementation steps to make the community's vision a reality will be drafted. These may include suggested revisions to land development regu- lations, comprehensive plan amendments, and/or the creation of an overlay district for the master plan area. Implementation strategies will include steps to implementing the vision within the 5 year terms that the City has been using to gauge development time-lines. Short-term steps that the City can immediately begin will be highlighted to give the community confidence that their vision will come to fruition. 7 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District Plan Report Dover-Kohl will create a concise plan document that incorporates and refines portions of the inventory and assessment reports and describes the details of the preferred community vision for the Master Plan area. Clear planning principles developed by the community throughout the charrette, will guide the Master Plan. Recommendations and implementation steps will also be detailed within this document. The Master Plan report including recommendations will be completed within an agreeable time-frame to be determined with City Staff. The Master Plan report will detail the following. Note that Tier 1 and Tier 2 may not include each of these sec- tions. The differentiation between the Tiers is made at the end of this proposal. • Historic Preservation Plan • Analysis of National Register Areas o Local Designation Report • Land Development Regulations • Design Guidelines • Infrastructure • Trasnsportation Plan • Parking Plan • Open Space Plan o Existing Open Space Improvements o Opportunities for new Open Space • Civic Improvements o Existing Civic Facilities Assessment o Civic Facilities Plan • Sustainability • Town Center • Economic Analysis and Recommendations J • Land Development Regulations/FAR Study • Design Guidelines • West Lots • Economic Analysis • Development Plan • Land Development Regulations/FAR Study • Design Guidelines • Single Family Home Areas • Land Development Regulations • Other Areas • Land Development Regulations • Design Guidelines 8 Dover, Kohl Sz Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District Master Plan Components in Detail PHASE 3: The following is a detailed account of what the elements outlined DELIVERABLES above may entail: Historic Preservation Plan: All of the elements of Historic Preservation 1. Refined Illustrative Plan will be considered by team member JSK architectural in order to pro- 2. Refined Visualizations mote the tools and incentives for the rehabilitation of the distinctive 3. Project update information ! architecture of North Beach. for website 4. Facebook Page updates ! Design guidelines, existing regulations and incentives will be applied 5. Plan Report including in order to promote the success of the plan by retaining, reprogram- Recommendations I ming and rehabilitating those sites, structures and buildings that have 6. Presentation of Report & been deemed "historic" and listed in either or both the Miami Beach Recommendations Designated and Contributing Historic Buildings or the National Register of Historic Places. The Dover-Kohl team will identify areas and individual structures that are included within the existing historic districts (and opportunities for possible new designations) in order to apply pre-existing incentives established by the City of Miami Beach with the following objectives, tools and available incentives: • Recommend Potential Adaptive use of projects • Assist Owners in Comprehending the Incentives: o Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) o Ad Valorem Tax Credits o Investment Tax Credits (for depreciable properties) • Identify, create and promote potential ideas for the reinvigoration of North Beach through its Historic resources. To that end, the Dover-Kohl team may address isolated structures that are better suited to a new use and pos- sibly require a conditional use or special use per the Zoning Code. For example, multi-family residential areas which border commercial uses might be rehabilitated for smaller boutique hotel use. Infrastructure: Consultant shall provide an infrastructure analysis for the project including utilities such as roadway, water, sewer, and stormwater management for the Town Center, West Lots, Ocean Terrace/Collins Corridor, and other areas to be determined with the owner and client. Transportation Plan: A detailed streetscape plan incorporating the principles of Complete Streets, multiple modes of transportation, traffic calming, detailed vision for hardscape, landscape, and other site elements typical of the public realm such as street furnishings and pedestrian lighting. Parking Plan: In coordination with City staff, available parking within the public right of way and the influence of private parking facilities in the district will be analyzed to develop a plan that will suit the needs commensurate with the details of the Master Plan. The parking plan is expected to rely on data previously collected by the City. 9 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District Open Space Plan: Existing open space will be analyzed in coordination with City staff. The goal will be to identify opportunities for open space acquisition, and develop an overall design strategy for the design of the public realm with regards to theming and developing an identity for the project area. Civic Improvements: The Dover-Kohl team will inventory the locations of Civic facilities within the project area such as parks, museums, libraries, and other facilities to be determined with City staff, and North Beach stakeholders in order to develop a strategy for the physical locations of future facilities. Sustainability: The Dover-Kohl team will coordinate with City Staff and North Beach stakeholders to analyze current strategies for adaptation to Sea Level Rise (SLR). Economic Analysis and Recommendations: In order to get a solid foundation upon which to develop an overall vision for the study area, the Dover-Kohl team will prepare a detailed analysis of study area demographics, and market conditions for residential and commercial uses. 1.) Demographic Information and Analysis: This analysis will include an overview of the North Beach Primary Market Area (PMA) and metro market trends, as well as specific research and analysis of the area housing market and surrounding competitive areas. This analysis will include such factors as: • Identification of competitive market area • Population trends and projections • Household formation (trends and projections) • Demographic analysis of PMA • Trends and analysis of household tenure • Household composition (size, age, children, etc.) • Existing and projected households by income range 2.) Residential Market Analysis Residential Competitive Supply Analysis: • Identification of the competitive supply (existing and planned residential for-sale, and multi-family rental projects) • Area occupancy patterns and sales or rental rates (if required) • Profile of competitive development activity and trends • Evaluation of selected competitive projects in terms of(if required) Residential Site and Location Analysis: Location and physical characteristics of the subject site and surrounding area represent important considerations impacting the project's competitive position and market potentials. An evaluation of the proposed re-development area and features of the surrounding area will be performed to address the extent to which such factors will influence the competitive positioning and market potentials of the property. This evaluation will include: • Physical features/esthetics of the site • Area amenities • Access/transportation • Development trends in the area • Impacts of surrounding and adjacent land uses • Proximity to area activity generators • Support facilities (schools, shopping, medical, etc.) • Image/reputation • Others, as identified Residential Market Potential: Based on the results of the foregoing tasks, conclusions and 10 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District recommendations for each of the various residential components will be developed concerning the following key planning factors: • Competitive framework • Absorption time frame • Achievable rental and/or sales prices Project Planning Guidelines: With respect to each of the residential components that we may recommend, we will review market and development planning guidelines for the project, as appropriate based on our analysis,.our conclusions and recommendations will include such factors as: • Unit design • Unit mix and sizing • Sales pricing or rental rates of base units (if required) • Target market profile • Critical amenities and features Residential/Market Position Analysis: We will be examining the program in terms of any features and amenity development that should be considered. We will be providing you with an analysis that documents the market potentials for either condominiums, the market rate low or mid-rise rentals, or for- sale residential and townhomes within the PMA. We will also translate the findings of our research on the market, competitive, and the economic environments into specific conclusions and recommendations for a course of action which indicate the most attractive marketability prognosis. The report will include an analysis of current and future economic and market opportunities in North Beach overall with paragraphs/sections describing conditions specifically in the: • Town Center • West Lots • Single Family Home areas • Other areas TBD 3.) North Beach Retail Market Analysis: The purpose of this section of the study is to assess the market demand potential for retail development within the North Beach District. The assessment will include an analysis of retail supply and demand that is based on the following scope of work. a.) Supply: Market Overview—The Dover-Kohl team will review and quantify the current inventory of retail q �' Y in the North Miami District with comparison for Miami-Dade and other competitive submarkets covering total inventory as well as trends for occupancy/vacancy and rental rates. Competitive Audit—The supply analysis will include a competitive audit of significant shopping centers in the study area covering: • Location • Size • Year Built • Tenant Mix • OccupancyNacancy Rates • Rental Rates &CAM • Parking b.) Demand Retail Sales— Retail sales trends in the greater Miami-Dade market, including resident and tourist/visitor shares to gain perspective on spending patterns by consumer categories will be reviewed. 11 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District c.) Economic &Demographic Overview— Dover-Kohl will research and analyze local and regional economic/market trends focusing on the economic and demographic determinants of retail demand. d.) Estimating Retail Demand in the North Beach District—Goodkin will apply a retail demand model for estimating retail demand by major retail category in the North Beach District. The model will be based on estimates and assumption derived from the analysis of economic and demographic determinants of demand as well as productivity factors (sales per square foot) and capture rates by retail category to estimate projections of retail demand by major category over a five- to ten-year horizon. The analysis will also include estimates of inflow(retail expenditures flowing into the area) from residents living outside the study area as well as tourists and visitors and outflow (retail expenditures leaking out of the area) by North Beach residents. Deliverable— Dover-Kohl will prepare a final draft report of findings and conclusions prior to the planned Charrette date. The final draft report will address the demand potential for retail in the North Beach District by major retail category including total and annual average demand potential over and five- and/or ten- year horizon. The final report will be delivered two to three (2-3) weeks after the charrette to incorporated revisions or changes as warranted. Land Development Regulations: The creation of a new Vision for the North Beach District will require the modification of existing regulations that reflect the aspirations of the area's stakeholders. The Dover-Kohl team will work with City staff to review existing regulations and determine how to incorporate changes so as to ensure that the physical details of the Master Plan are translated in to built reality. This will involve the fine-tuning of existing regulations or creating a form-based code that will outline the desired character of buildings and public spaces through their individual volume, scale, and detailing. Design Guidelines: Dover-Kohl will work with City Staff to develop guidelines aligned with the goals of the Master Plan. These guidelines will enable the City to have a solid framework witihin which to evaluate proposals for new development applications. They will serve as metrics for details such as how the building meets the street, a provision for uniformity of signage, landscaping, frontage, parking and other elements to be determined. Public Presentations of the Plan & Recommendations A Principal and Project Director from Dover-Kohl and key members of the Dover-Kohl team will be on-site in North Beach to present the Master Plan Report and Recommendations to the public. This presentation could be a special meeting or at an official public hearing for the commission and/or City Council. The team members will be available to answer questions and explain the details of the plan, overlay district, plan amend- ments and other recommendations. Additional meetings with the public and City Staff follow to insure plan consensus with the number of meetings determined by the City's selected Tier. A Principal and Project Director from Dover-Kohl and key members of the Dover-Kohl team be available to the City for additional City Council or other public meetings for the approval of the Master Plan and master plan amendments. 12 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District PROJECT TIMELINE PHASE 1 - REVIEW, INVENTORY months months months months &ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING 1 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 9 10 - 12 ' CONDITIONS Preliminary Conference Call I Public Awareness (outreach strategy& materials; create website) Review Existing Plans/Studies Site Visit/Report (interviews &meetings; area on-site analysis; press conference; site visit report) PHASE 2 - CREATING THE MASTER PLAN AREA VISION Kick-off Presentation • Hands-on Design Session Open Design Studio (define vision; produce draft plans&design • concepts, technical analysis of design concepts; meetings with Steering Committee, stakeholders and experts; open house) Work-in Progress Presentation PHASE 3 - FINAL MASTER PLAN & REPORT Refine Illustrative Plan/Visualizations (illustrate the vision) Master Plan Recommendations Report (updated analysis, vision and guiding principles; land use and urban design recommendations; multimodal transportation and stormwater improvements; implementation strategy, including funding options) Review & Revise the North Miami Beach Master Plan Final Presentation Meetings with City and Public 13 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District FEE SCHEDULE Every project is customized in close consultation with our clients. We recognize the need to maintain a reasonable budget while at the same time creating a useful and detailed Master Plan. The budget summary identifies three (3) fee tiers comprised of the necessary major phases to create a Master Plan. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Typical reimbursable expenses include travel (including transportation, food, and lodging), reproduction expenses, mailing, long-distance telephone, or any other miscellaneous or out-of-pocket expenses reasonably contemplated by the scope of services for this project. TIER 1 PHASE 1 - REVIEW, INVENTORY &ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS $38,500 Preliminary Conference Call; Establising a Steering Committee; Public Awareness; (outreach strategy &materials; create website); Review Existing Plans/Studies; Site Visit/Report (interviews & meetings; area on-site analysis; press conference; site visit report) PHASE 2 - CREATING THE MASTER PLAN AREA VISION $114,000 • 5-day Charrette Process (S 1,000/day - $5,000/week + Staff time) • 3 Community Meetings • 4 Public Hearings • Meetings with City Staff as needed Kick-off Presentation; Hands-on Design Session; Open Design Studio (define vision; produce draft plans &design concepts, technical analysis of design concepts; meetings with Steering Committee, stakeholders, and experts; open house); Work-in Progress Presentation PHASE 3 - FINAL MASTER PLAN & REPORT $109,750 Refine Illustrative Plan/Visualizations', (illustrate the vision); Master Plan Recommendations Report (updated analysis, vision and guiding principles; land use and urban design recommendations; multimodal transportation and stormwater improvements; implementation strategy,, including funding options); Review &Revise the North Miami Beach Master Plan (to include the following elements): Historic Preservation Plan (Analysis of National Register Areas for Local Designation; Land Development Regulations; Design Guidelines) • Infrastructure • Transportation Plan• Town Center (Economic Analysis and Recommendations; Land Development Regulations/FAR Study; Design Guidelines) • West Lots (Economic Analysis; Development Plan; Land Development Regulations/FAR Study; Design Guidelines) • Other Areas (Design Guidelines) Final Presentation Reimbursable Expenses $22,750 Total Fee $285,000 14 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District ANTICIPATED CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant Team's estimated budget and completion of tasks within a timely basis is contingent on the City providing available information and its participation with respect to certain project activities: A. To facilitate communications, the City should provide a single point of contact for logistical needs for the Consultant Team. B. The City is anticipated to provide public outreach throughout the project. This includes working with the Consultant Team to identify key stakeholders, contacting stakeholders to coordinate attendance at. meetings and workshops, and the printing and distribution of materials to promote Charrette events. The Consultant Team will provide assistance with public outreach as described in Phase 1. C. The City will provide relevant base data and information. The Consultant Team will provide a list of base data requested for the development of the master plan. Available information should be delivered to the Consultant Team at least four to six weeks prior to the Charrette. Requested data not available will be identified; City and Consultant.will work together to find an appropriate alternate data source. D. The City will be responsible for scheduling and securing meeting spaces for project meetings and presentations. E. In order to conduct a successful Charrette process: i. The City will identify additional table facilitators as needed for the Hands-on Design Workshop. The Consultant Team will provide at least ten (10) facilitators, and will provide a briefing/ instruction for all new facilitators. There should be one (1) facilitator per every ten (10) attendees to the workshop. ii. The City will provide meeting spaces for Charrette events, including meeting rooms, presentation rooms, studio workspace and basic equipment. Consultant will provide a list of needed equipment for the studio space (tables, chairs, etc). iii. The City will provide necessary refreshments for all public involvement events. iv. The City will provide for video recording of all public meetings and workshops, if desired. v. The City should make every effort to ensure the attendance of a majority of elected officials and stakeholders at Charrette presentations. E The City will be responsible for distribution of draft report materials for community/stakeholder review, including the printing of hard copies and maintaining/updating a project website. G. The City will be responsible for providing a unified set of comments to the draft summary report within an agreed time frame. 15 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District FEE SCHEDULE Every project is customized in close consultation with our clients. We recognize the need to maintain a reasonable budget while at the same time creating a useful and detailed Master Plan. The budget summary identifies three (3) fee tiers comprised of the necessary major phases to create a Master Plan. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Typical reimbursable expenses include travel (including transportation, food, and lodging), reproduction expenses, mailing, long-distance telephone, or any other miscellaneous or out-of-pocket expenses reasonably contemplated by the scope of services for this project. TIER 1 PHASE 1 - REVIEW, INVENTORY &ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS S38,500 Preliminary Conference Call; Establising a Steering Committee; Public Awareness; (outreach strategy &materials; create website); Review Existing Plans/Studies; Site Visit/Report (interviews &meetings; area on-site analysis; press conference; site visit report) PHASE 2 - CREATING THE MASTER PLAN AREA VISION $114,000 • 5-day Charrette Process (8 1,000/day - 85,000/week + Staff time) • 3 Community Meetings • 4 Public Hearings • Meetings with City Staff as needed Kick-off Presentation; Hands-on Design Session; Open Design Studio (define vision; produce draft plans &design concepts, technical analysis of design concepts; meetings with Steering Committee, stakeholders, and experts; open house); Work-in Progress Presentation PHASE 3 - FINAL MASTER PLAN & REPORT $109,750 Refine Illustrative Plan/Visualizations; (illustrate the vision); Master Plan Recommendations Report (updated analysis, vision and guiding principles; land use and urban design recommendations; multimodal transportation and stormwater improvements; implementation strategy, including funding options); Review & Revise the North Miami Beach Master Plan (to include the following elements): Historic Preservation Plan (Analysis of National Register Areas for Local Designation; Land Development Regulations; Design Guidelines) • Infrastructure • Transportation Plan. Town Center (Economic Analysis and Recommendations; Land Development Regulations/FAR Study; Design Guidelines) • West Lots (Economic Analysis; Development Plan; Land Development Regulations/FAR Study; Design Guidelines) • Other Areas (Design Guidelines) Final Presentation Reimbursable Expenses $22,750 Total Fee $285,000 14 Dover, Kohl & Partners • September 29, 2015 • DRAFT Scope and Budget RFQ 2015-086-YG • Master Planner of the North Beach District SCHEDULE C — RATE SCHEDULE For Master Planner of the North Beach District RFQ No. 2014-050-SR [Intentionally Omitted] Page 32 of 36 SCHEDULE D INSURANCE CERTIFICATE Page 33 of 36 ATTACHMENT A Resolution, Commission Item Summary, and Commission Memorandum Page 34 of 36 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-28990 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2015-086-YG (THE RFQ), FOR A MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE IMAGE NETWORK, INC., OF DELAWARE D/B/A DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE IMAGE NETWORK, INC., OF DELAWARE D/B/A DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDSA, INC; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH EDSA, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH PERKINS + WILL; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH PERKINS + WILL, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ISSUE A NEW RFQ; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2015-086-YG (the RFQ) was issued on February 3, 2015, with an opening date of February 26, 2015; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on February 10, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City received a total of six (6) proposals; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 100-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), consisting of the following individuals: • Nancy Liebman, Miami Beach resident and member of Miami Beach United • Daniel Veitia, Miami Beach resident and member of the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach Revitalization • Jeff Oris, Director, Economic Development Division, Tourism, Culture And Economic Development Department • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department • Josiel Ferrer Diaz, Transportation Coordinator, Transportation Department; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on March 30, 2015 to consider the proposals received; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and engaged in a question and answer session after the presentation of each proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's rankings were as follows: The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners, top-ranked; Zyscovich, Inc., second highest ranked; EDSA, Inc., third highest ranked; Perkins + Will, fourth highest ranked; HKS, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architects, LLP., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2015-086-YG (the RFQ), for Master Planner of the North Beach District; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners; and should negotiations fail with The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners, the Administration is hereby authorized to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc.; and should negotiations fail with Zyscovich, Inc., the Administration is hereby authorized to enter into negotiations with EDSA, Inc; and should negotiations fail with EDSA, Inc., the Administration is hereby authorized to enter into negotiations with Perkins + Will; and should negotiations fail with Perkins +Will, the Administration is hereby authorized to issue a new RFQ; further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this,...�:;�--,�"_t 1 day of April 2015. ATTEST: ', r, ... <s.a ,-- - ''"'"'--:.;-; ----;;:='-5.- : i_ :, "4/1 if A 7,, ::,‘ -, ;i - 1 R.-'ael E. Granada. CI Clerk ,. Philip Levine Ma=;i F r -:<,- x_<:):::..::7:: , : / / i I:\AGENDA 120151Aprii\PRCCUREMENT\RFQ-2015 086 YGMaster Plann-r of e North Beach District-Reso.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE 8c FO pfXECUTION , 1 J .(..._ 4 �qw (5 City Attorney Dote COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)NO.2015-086-YG,FOR MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Revitalize Key Neighborhoods, Starting With North Beach And Ocean Drive Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2015-086-YG to seek the proposals from a qualified master planner for the North Beach District.The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on January 27, 2015. The RFQ was released on February 3, 2015.A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on February 10, 2015. On February 26, 2015, the City received proposals from: Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architects LLP., The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover Kohl& Partners, EDSA, Inc., HKS, Inc., Perkins +Will, Zyscovich, Inc. On March 30, 2015, the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened to consider the responsive proposals received.The Committee was instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received,the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2015- 086-YG,for a Master Planner of the North Beach District,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked proposer,The Image Network, Inc.,of Delaware, Inc.,d/b/a Dover Kohl & Partners. Should negotiations be unsuccessful with the top ranked proposer, the City Manager recommends the Administration be authorized to negotiate with the following firms in order of rank: Zyscovich, Inc., EDSA, Inc., and Perkins + Will. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. 2 3 OBPI Total Financial Impact Summary: City Clerk's Offic--Legislative Tracking: Alex � ni ,, ension 6641 e �11kil t Di ector Assistant Cit ,. - P 1��► y ,,� � City IVI-Aa er: AD JJ MT 11170 JL � =- v^ .� AGENDA120151ApriI1PRI REMENTIRFQ-2015-086-YG Master Pla T:I e North Beach District-Summary..oc fra MIAMIBEACH AGENDA ITEM R 01.17-1 6 28 DATE � c• MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSI•N MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members • the City C. mission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager .fitim DATE: APRIL 15, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2015-086-YG, FOR MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Revitalize Key Neighborhoods, Starting With North Beach And Ocean Drive FUNDING The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. BACKGROUND The City has been studying ways to encourage and promote appropriate, redevelopment activity for the 71st Street Corridor and Ocean Terrace, as well as encourage the preservation and restoration of contributing buildings in the North Shore and Normandy Isles National Register Districts. In addition the City will be looking at appropriate ways to develop the City- owned "West Lots". At the request of the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach the City seeks a qualified world class consultant to establish a North Beach Master Plan. Once a qualified consultant is selected, the City expects to work with the consultant to determine the scope of services for and refined study area for the North Beach Master Plan. The study area will be the North Beach section of the City, which is located north of 63rd Street to the northern city limit at 87th Terrace. Major developments have been built and historic structures have been restored in all parts of the City in the recent past with the exception of the North Beach area, where investment has been lagging. RFQ PROCESS In order to select a qualified master planner, on January 27, 2015, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2015-086-YG for a Master Planner of the North Beach District. On February 3, 2015, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre- proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on February 10, 2015. RFQ responses were due and received on February 26, 2015. The City received a total of six(6)proposals. 629 -• • 1 Commission Memorandum -Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals Pursuant to Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2015-086-YG,for Master Planner of the North Beach District April 15, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals from the following firms: Cooper, Robertson & Partners Architects LLP The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover Kohl & Partners EDSA, Inc. HKS, Inc. Perkins +Will Zyscovich, Inc. On March 9, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 100-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee(the "Committee"), consisting of the following individuals: • Nancy Liebman, Miami Beach resident and member of Miami Beach United • Daniel Veitia, Miami Beach resident and member of the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach Revitalization • Jeff Oris, Director, Economic Development Division, Tourism, Culture And Economic Development Department • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department • Josiel Ferrer Diaz, Transportation Coordinator, Transportation Department The Committee convened on March 30, 2015 to consider proposals received and interview the proposers. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. Additionally, the Committee engaged in a question and answer session after the presentation of each proposer. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in the table below. tis 's _ `_ LOW �.. Daniel Nancy Rogelio Josiel :� AGGREGATE Veitia Ranking, Liebman Ranking Jeff Oris Ranking Madan Ranking Ferrer Ranking TOTALA Rank Dover.Kohl&Partners 92 1 98 1 93 1 93 1 91 3 7 1 Zyscovich 90 2 98 1 84 2 89 5 92 2 12 2 EDSA,Inc. 60 6 70 3 75 3 91 3 93 1 16 3 Perkins+Will 85 3 60 4 74 4 92 2 90 4 c,k, 17 4 KKS,Inc. 75 4 60 4 73 5 86 6 83 5 24 5 Cooper.Robertson& Partners Architects LLP 70 5 30 6 51 6 _ 90 4 80 6 27 6 MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked proposer, The Image Network, Inc., of Delaware d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners. Should negotiations fail with the top ranked proposer, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations with the second ranked proposer, Zyscovich, Inc. Should negotiations fail with the second ranked proposer, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations with the third ranked proposer, EDSA, Inc. Should negotiations fail with the third ranked proposer, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations 630 Commission Memorandum-Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals Pursuant to Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2015-086-YG, for Master Planner of the North Beach District April 15, 2015 Page 3 with the fourth ranked proposer, Perkins + Will. Should negotiations fail with the fourth ranked proposer, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to issue a new RFQ. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2015-086-YG (the RFQ), for Master Planner of the North Beach District. JLM/JJ/MT/TM/AD/YG T:I AGENDA120151April 1PROCUREMENTIRFQ-2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District-Memo.doc 631 RESOLUTION TO BE SUBMITTED 632 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 633 ATTACHMENT B Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2014-050-SR Page 35 of 36 MIAMI City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2015-086-YG MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT FEBRUARY 19, 2015 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2015, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.3—Similar Experience has been modified as follows: Item #2.3.9 and 2.3.12 are duplicated. As such, item #2.3.12 has been removed from this section of the RFQ. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: Is it possible to get a copy of the list of attendees for the Pre-Submittal Meeting that occurred this morning for the referenced Bid? Al: A copy of the sign-in sheet for the pre-proposal meeting is included in this addendum as Attachment"A". Q2: What is the schedule and total duration of task 1 and task 2 that the consultant firm or team with master planning experience is to assist the City with, as described in Section 0200 `Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions', 2. Purpose, paragraph 1. A2: The schedule and total duration of these tasks will be negotiated with the selected firm after award of the RFQ. As indicated in Page 3 of the RFQ, Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose: "For the purposes of this RFQ, the selection process will be based on qualifications. No proposal for specifics to the master plan is being requested, nor will be considered, at this time." Q3: What are the deliverables the consultant firm or team with master planning experience is expected to provide on completion of task 1 and task 2, as described in Section 0200 `Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions', 2. Purpose, paragraph 1. A3: The deliverables will be negotiated with the selected firm after award of the RFQ. As indicated in Page 3 of the RFQ, Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose: "For the purposes of this RFQ, the selection process will be based on qualifications. No proposal for specifics to the master plan is being requested, nor will be considered, at this time." 1 Q4: What is the budget for completion of services provided by the consultant firm or team with master planning experience for task 1 and task 2, as described in Section 0200 `Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions', 2. Purpose, paragraph 1 A4: A budget has not been identified at this time for this project. Q5: Page 12 of the RFQ requests that "Proposer shall also address how it plans to incorporate Small or Disadvantaged Firms in its delivery of services." Is there a specific SBE/DBE goal or requirement for this project? A5: No. Q6: Per the pre-submittal meeting today for RFQ No. 2015-086-YG, I would like to request two clarifications from the RFQ. Firstly, I would like to request a map of the district to be utilized in this project. Secondly, I would like clarification on whether the necessary experience is five years versus within five years. See Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.1 as well as Appendix C, Tab Cl, No. 1. A6: A map of the district is included in this addendum as Attachment "B". The intent of minimum requirement # 1 of Appendix C, Section Cl is for the proposer to: 1 a) have at least five (5) years of experience with projects of similar scope; and 1 b) to have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope. The above is only a minimum requirement for Proposer to be further considered and is mutually exclusive from the submittal requirement (Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.1) of the five (5) relevant projects within the last five (5) years. Q7: Please provide the project schedule (if available, including all phases) A7: Please refer to the response provided for Question #2 in this addendum. Q8: Please provide the construction budget(if available). A8: A construction budget is unknown at this time. Q9: Please clarify the type of proceeding — is this an invited selection process / RFQ or an open RFQ? A9: This RFQ is not restricted to invited proposers. Proposers that meet the minimum requirements and are able to perform the services solicited are encouraged to respond. Q10: Can you please provide the previous FAR Study of the study area? A10: The FAR Study is included in this addendum as Attachment"C" Q11: Re: Appendix A, Page 6: Proposer Certification - Must the Proposer Certification be notarized by a State of Florida Notary Public? Will you accept as valid the document notarized by a Notary Public registered in another State in the United States? Al 1: Yes. It is acceptable that Appendix A be notarized by a Notary Public registered in another State. Q12: Can you please provide a map of the study area? Al2: A map of the district is included in this addendum as Attachment"B". 2 Q13: Please provide the number and if possible the names of the offices who will participate / be invited. A13: Please refer to Attachment "D" included in this addendum to view the names of the proposers notified of this RFQ via www.publicpurchase.com Q14: Which stakeholder groups will the City include in the master plan process? A14: The "Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach" will likely be the primary group that will be dealing with the Master Plan Process. Panel meetings would serve as the primary venue for public participation, where all residents, business owners, property owners, and other stakeholders will be able to participate. The Miami Design Preservation League (MDPL) will likely be a major participant at those meetings. Q15: SECTION 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format, 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm states "Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience..." while Appendix C, Section Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope." Please clarify that the minimum requirement projects must have been performed in the last five (5) years. A15: The intent of minimum requirement# 1 of Appendix C, Section Cl is for the proposer to: 1 a) have at least five (5) years of experience with projects of similar scope; and 1 b) to have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope. The above is only a minimum requirement for Proposer to be further considered and is mutually exclusive from the submittal requirement (Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.1) of the five (5) relevant projects within the last five (5)years. Q16: SECTION 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format, 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm states "Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience..." May we submit more than five (5) projects? A16: Yes. Q17: Is sub-consultant project experience to be included in SECTION 0300 - Submittal Instructions and Format, 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm? Is there a limit to the number of projects that may be submitted? A17: Only qualifications of the Proposing Firm are to be submitted. There is no limit to the number of projects. Q18: Please provide the plan holder list. A18: There is no list of plan holders. There are no plans in this RFQ. Q19: Please provide the estimated value. A19: The estimated value for this project is unknown at this time. Q20: Can the proposing firm be located outside the US if working together with a licensed local office? Or can the local licensed architect/masterplanner be the proposer and use the references and experience of the internationally known masterplanner who is part of their team to qualify?Which is preferred or is there another preferred way to structure this type of arrangement where the local office has the Florida professional license which is 3 required and the international office has the type of experience required? A20: Proposing firm, regardless of the location, must be licensed to perform the work. Joint Ventures are not allowed. The structure of the Firm and Team Members is left up to the discretion of the Proposing firm. Q21: Can projects that were started before 5 years ago, but finished within the 5 year period be used as relevant experience? A21: The intent of minimum requirement# 1 of Appendix C, Section Cl is for the proposer to: 1 a) have at least five (5) years of experience with projects of similar scope; and 1 b) to have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope. The above is only a minimum requirement for Proposer to be further considered and is mutually exclusive from the submittal requirement (Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.1) of the five (5) relevant projects within the last five (5) years. Q22: Can projects from 2009 be used or will only projects later than that, i.e. 2010, be accepted? A22: Please refer to the answer provided for question #21 in this addendum. Q23: Point 2.1 requires the `agency' name and contact details, is this referring to the client for that reference project? A23: Yes, that is correct. Q24: How many proposers does the City intend on short-listing for the interview? A24: This information is unknown at this time. The Evaluation Committee may perform interviews as indicated in Section 0400— Statements of Qualifications Evaluation. Q25: What are the expectations for the interview? A25: This information will be provided to Proposers prior interviews. Q26: What is the anticipated compensation for the M/P phase? It seems we are to propose a scope/schedule as part of the RFQ deliverables, but we don't see a fee proposal as part of the submission. A26: Compensation will be negotiated with the selected firm after the RFQ is awarded. As indicated in Page 3 of the RFQ, Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose: "For the purposes of this RFQ, the selection process will be based on qualifications. No proposal for specifics to the master plan is being requested, nor will be considered, at this time." Q27: Tentative project schedule? Phases which the City had in mind? A27: This will be negotiated with the selected firm after the RFQ is awarded. Q28: Is there/will there be a city appointed public outreach person to aid in this project? A28: The City will provide public notice for any public meetings; however, the need for an official public outreach person to aid the project will be decided upon when the scope of services is finalized with the selected consultant. 4 i . , I i Q29: On page 11 of the Solicitation under Submittal Instructions and Format, points 2.3.9 and 1 2.3.12 of `Experience and Qualifications' are exactly the same. Assuming that this was an error, is there an additional point to be addressed or are there only 13 points in this section? !I A29: Yes, this was in error. Please note correction on page 1 of this addendum. With the correction i made, there are only thirteen (13) points to be addressed under Section 2.3 of Tab 2. il Q30: Will the sign in sheet be available online? !I A30: Please refer to the answer provided for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q31: The RFQ is clear in its North-South definition of the master plan boundries (63rd St up to 87th Terrace) but It is not as clear as to what are its East-West boundries. We assume the Atlantic Ocean is the east but it is not clear whether or not Biscayne Bay is the western border or if Biscayne Point/Normandy Isle/Allison Island are included in the study area. fl Can you provide a map/detailed information about the city owned "West Lots"? A31: A map of the district is included in this addendum as Attachment"B". Q32: Please clarify if the, "Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" or if the "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope.". A32: The intent of minimum requirement# 1 of Appendix.C, Section Cl is for the proposer to: la) have at least five (5) years of experience with projects of similar scope; and 1 b) to have completed at least five (5) projects similar in scope. I The above is only a minimum requirement for Proposer to be further considered and is mutually exclusive from the submittal requirement (Section 0300, Tab 2, Section 2.1) of the five (5) relevant projects within the last five (5) years. Q33: Could you please send out the list of attendees (present and on the phone) to the City of Miami Beach North Beach Master Planner RFQ pre-submittal meeting? A33: Please refer to the answer provided for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement { Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov • Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Since OF Ale roe ) spurement Director 5 i i I 1 ATTACHMENT "A" PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET 6 * IAM1BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 10, 2015 RFQ No.: 2015-086-YG TITLE: Master Planner of the North Beach District NAME (PLEASE PRINT) COMPANY NAME-E-MAIL ADDRESS PHONE# FAX# Yusbel Gonzalez City of Miami Beach 305-673-7490 786-394- 4073 yusbelgonzalet@miamibeachfl.gov I ico V.t2 ► \t ( osE Tfb/►2AI EZ e (1nivE12301 inFp_i2►9 7e' 531 C2-53 • CON LiJoa SOS, (a( -3(655 1. g-' t a A �� 1 t S j Er + ?.03C-Cc-A- 4.-1-ut.A2A,N1 A-Ssoct MES 5 STA-N`"-SKLM bZCCa @ sk B 0g0 _ � � �+- p e 1, I avc. 6.13— leezdt cS ThflSPer IS� ter �Qrs SferI ISli -tors.awl .E KY) -- , q C, 3c$4(.12 1 C( 2,053 Mck ,c)(yi5bedo com '7_,,_:„-L-t% MIAMIBEACH PRE-PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 10, 2015 RFQ No.: 2015-086-YG TITLE: Master Planner of the North Beach District NAME (PLEASE PRINT) COMPANY NAME-E-MAIL ADDRESS PHONE# FAX# Yusbel Gonzalez City of Miami Beach 305-673-7490 786-394- 4073 , y-usbelgonzalezRmiamibeachfl.gov GeQst..eo. .2-rr c.. 403s , 5c-okt—Gros SO 'yule,.(..c,"‘ 3°5• c fnur\ic-cl \-W--s ,-,,,c,.co cv, 1'154.1).S.1104, c-r\-<\c.1.4- Co vn . ,.. r■ t1/4 - • e q SQf 1 13,12(16'2- , ,. kik SQ.(•Zr7i8)-Q 2 Ct-) -CaLIC4 (Pr() 3C-6- -' --15--3'M II c‘ \ 1 a-18401A CV I I 1 10 01 ikt 1/14A/1-- 1,.fi 91 , c 0-04 2)b9-t-gg'Obe)-2-7 1 ! C b On (1.304 1274411-007 ii:g1 g/11 OS kfiocoiA,OzT COEN litOoth: -71-6-7 1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 10, M CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE `► SIGN-IN SHEET n 4-4t NAME (PLEASE PRINT) COMPANY NAME-E-MAIL ADDRESS PHONE# FAX; �3 6-2 M£u..o AJ A M I Ir f A►2T'R4 �.� (414 S k ' ke � I n . . re „p ct uAi4 co in i AMA ii dp,iA Ise NA.) PitAi joa.L, Ae-caM UST 'O c i,JA u s JoS�n�A»� tgQDLOr�'b , GO rye Acme. line gbo?r'r'oi.or4-6an. Lon') Coe,Pert (Lo a 612.rsoiv 4 Pk trN -S . F ere/2- J . s M Th 4 co. K seY oG14S SUS A-1‘) GoLDSTi-enl I ' RFQ No.:A ,1.5.-4. 0,6w yq ATTACHMENT "B" MAP OF NORTH BEACH AREA 7 , . ..,.. , . , North Beach Area iii, ,,:.,,,, .: ,..,,,..,,,,,,...,..•. .. .,. . ..,...... .,,,.,.. . .. ..,,,.._ , . , .., , ', :.-.-.°,....,:: `,,,'-'-,;;,......„-,-4, ,t,.'.*.4,:‘-,,A,,,,,'2 .,:.•,..,',."...:',- ,... , - -. . ,-,:....i:;':,' "'.-%:..- - ' . ,.-,,.,,- 4, il • v mmtirlm-E2 ,• . . =.,,,,,..;TEN p - - _- mull... LI=it=z _ . . . , . . .. . .iiiIIIIIIIIIIIIsseli= ,.'s-!-----t-i-.11 • .44 IIIIIIIIIiii— —1:-.11_,. IIIIIIIII; . .. ..,.... . , *. „ — ''•. 11111111 II'I-------- LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII:iiiiii.1 1 —...... °"11_......t.;-...__ It ' - ° ' . ' . -* • rifiTIO1111.,..,..1141:.. .. eis"....1112 , 11 IlliniiaillIppl!li .. = iiiii....,. "111.1.1.■, ,:•,,.:,,, ‘,,,,,::•,:.,,, ,,,,.,,,,,,, ..,. ,, ,,,,,,,,..z,,,,,.::,,„.i-,,,,,,.•i',,i,, ,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,:•,,:. , ..:;.,..fiiiiiiiiiiii..„tilifiln:.:'wititilimii,ill LI.:„..".....„.fi,Fi-!....„1. ,, 1 -ire 1 • - . •,• .-,, ,,,, .,, ...,... „,. •:..,,,:„,,,,,,.,-.,, , .T.,... West Lots ,,, ... . • iiAilfi..=...=iiiilipipp...,!iiir,, /,..41t,. .1 , .. . .., - . , -....:"idie416"===riiiiiiiiir,24. /4L...,...,...:7-.....„ .=,=....„1.1„...1[11. . ...'' ' ' ...0-inlimiltill-:=Zv, -, Iiiiir .. '4'Ezli--' -,- ill a, */-(1,,./lj 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiMlit"iiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI niMlita....r.,:irP------+4 4,4t,•*(.".I'l.,,r4'$.14.,:,,:r=_,.,,,,='1::'Sfl...7.7.-7'.,,r'fz.=il_w=74.....,' • , : \rdiiiiiiilillilliiiiiiiiinejiiiiiiiilmilitimilmmiiifiltla4iilliiiiiii.ilii!Ilikl=E11°':; gir,v 4:t),4,,7--Lr.t..,E:L;.zs.:tr.;.=T.!iu.t,....ji,t ,...............=; ,,,..„.,.. * 4.as a=====..a ,:.....7_74,.=E== = , 4'44 ..,s7j..3:..P. __+,,.■-'11111:7,.7.,,._,..... .:::,r.-..;.4..=i1r::,..-17. ' s . • N.1.. .1._-_--- tz,..--r;,,ow=17.=z.-rz,i-=.z.... .. , • --. . it la 11 UUUUU I to R 4 •ii '•Il ur U a -. --.4 ----- II ..."P-... --r-r.--i r--'I!= •.z....,. :-.7.-[...I....7:n FR 7.,..241,-E.......,. ..„7.1 a * , •*°Illt•-.111114911111111-1111i11111111111.1■11111111P11.__11.1101111111.1111111611111111111111111111181- ‘• cit'44till' [31.17,124.11,7==,111--:17=7.i!".:11.17:4-='!:11,.. * oiNstli.11------__-----',---------- • .4#14, --- • '',7\3": ma-.... ...1116 ........ a.101 ISM .... NW...... !PM ........... . , '‘‘,S,, 111111. *040' 41111 manimr= - -• - rms"-\\ J • 4 --01111111111iiii, \.1:1161.11111ritillik\ : :;,.,-- Iiii: i _,..........--• ,..._ ,,_.',„. ........-F4— ill , 4./ - a )S'* 14111111111111i11`.$ Q.,.._,?,..gfilEIST-Tig:illi LI.,17z"SliiM- :i i ••/A -$ a til‘ silt111111111 loll\S.:.,.. -71-._74-74-4L'..i.E-,..'oiLE:'iii..if,,..,:.rs.r.7.717,2,..,,,zz, ,, • 11111;"-.8%%v $1,‘ s‘1‘1111611---777r,WrN.1;0' 'r,.......°'7.r....7k7,7:E12.1547,=':,1"243":*Zi:611.Z.: ' I a Airil Iiiii4P1111111.11--!1111.!----:itiAti, • 0 0 \A 0\150iiati----op? 0 4 ra.z..,,,==ILEE.7.,1,,,,....,,,t,.„1= a : ltIIIV:1---------.1%1%ltiali.trellIli;lgllallitIIIII'tllttI--:i.o.I'r\ttt-us •‘:::%1_,‘,\:%c‘",\941‘t"..:''It,A—..----16.1uV..........:-.-11.iforsil 1.1111.1111111itn111111111.11r111:ra'.:11':\ir.‘‘)_+_s\1_ 4,1/.4#°"„I:1.4.'":‘ItNvi....7.:Liziht="'■j7;;..,st:......1.......:=: 22 Itt II V,==.........==....... 1.11.--11' iii■A______________,111111111111111_,..111111111‘ 10CS t ' VNIIiisiiiiiii 110111111111 4 ie xs=72 ma - .1%,''"--- 'ulna wicruiiI101-.."-„,4 4% sil‘11‘11111111 • V■----:,,, ..1_--%11111 .---.--.,--- ------- -„At% '. 0 ... . • II,ma;LI.. • .• -,a, ---:--iiiiiiii .tti,0 *,,, • —= . .••• 1, 1. dre...(*Itil_ .,.... --- se,....1,i‘l■ ,A •" . .,. MEW 11■11..10 410. x $ unonhowara NUM ., ' • 10PONIC-‘,„........"Alip*Villillilillil II-4 % ,.,, e a .,,,,,INNS I W*NSiii1111111i MN 111.111111116..,.1,...t%%‘%%/n.,,- • 11 Iiii:":=1 '1 4 '.- 1111filifiiiirrA.,°' 4. s •,1.,.......Z.i "I , • 1,-"`",w,-1-. .inmitilispi .1-;;A•■‘ e /4 .'ill.,. iii,illi111111111111114?....11".03%11111 **• 011PA . ...,:i..,, i 4 4 *% filtki 111111111, ii. Ais . .41170:111.1"" .. _____...... we 00 . .. • os • almlilli • .-oliTfirol'ITC*11 . rdlow 0v10.,...\lot go. sii a 1 ""'"*""""Eneaang II . , A.44.Stlitiltittal a '8"2 •-7-"' . 11'417111 ' ' '\". 1:-'I .', '-'-':„ ::-..; ',:::'''*, *'',''" ' .:'■:,. .. al M 11 117.71 II I 14 I I IA 1:71 I 111 I IS.i:'1,111 11 II II I lit.i.15:11:1‘111 11...1 I I 1,11.1.1i:j.17 lit'I ll 11 ill 6 t' r v. ..,,m 1pp,isimi,... tisit wow * 5 ..•10111 a =maw I SraillS, 1111 0 i , mz,..... so Zr. 4416 i 4 11%if, 11:11 a Cril -z/ILY * , . . . . .. .. . . a . ..,. dAre,•-.1141 •-- wo •:1:. • . •....„ . . , .. ,. . . ,.. . % di" ,AR go l• il; m EiVe, . Iliiiii ,, _ ,...,,;,..,,,,,,,,.,,,,,, y, . ilr4''IP...V,. s40.iligfijOA•AIIII:11111, A,4411140i,- ir-41 PP' . -;.:. ' Ost..' 1,t,,,r•Si °I: . - - ,. -■- -.,, - '''' '.• , ' ''t."' - -• ‘ j\\SCBt-'. • %* III =III le iilit.\l'isik UM 11011111111 W+E 44 -tillijos\%4. ra =NW - -':, - - , < •:,'-'..',.-,,. : . 1...4tft ,-., LEGEND West Lots libit02.21.11 am! "i''' — 3 000 ..... = o .375.750 1,500 2,250 , Fee . •..North Beach Area - ....r_iiii.... 16, . • matiAlto_Itli - .......,...- -__..,._.......- ATTACHMENT "C" FAR STUDY 8 V - . . , ' .1W . . , .„. ii, ...„, iiiiiiimell 1 II -... . „ . . 'V- - et • 4) ' J: (0) I .. ' Cm, 4":. CO lit (..) , . , . ' 41111111141, 111.1111AP ' oillMmi - - - - 0 in tn am en a:. UM.11 . , ' ' 'F..... *if .0 0 ;Ira 03 0 c %NI LU . . . 8 i " V) ••-• ?°%' CC) _ , INIIIIIIIIII < E '4Ia 'CI .. + . (ft 0 = . ' = . CC 4■1 c 2 c 0 < . . F."' • Imm...1 as ,,,, 4.0 I- O . .4.. CD inamim C::1 . •' -EI w 0 —1.•• - - 4„„ "-", - . - -*--:,A„,-,------<.---- ----7,-„„„, ---. „,--.„--,--,-,-7-„,--,--- ---v----- -,. - _--7 ---- - '- ' „ = --_----!-;-,--',„-:„,---- '---';„ ,---- - ---- -' 4A-::''' ' - ,-0%' -.--4----, =--7----,------ -7 - ,,, __,,,,,,:7-,rw- ,,,,,--: ,,= ,.,..,iv,-.,-,,, -•- ,.-;;..-:- _-, ,--.-- --_,- '-71*-,7,:,-,-,:-- --- ,-,-,,,, ,,,-,-','"'''.,,:-.-,,,T,,:%'-' •-i, "=-- -,%---- -t.7--:'-='-,%'-'.--'2!_'' ,%'-':':'„,-%%f 0--_-%-!--4„,-- ,,-,--.„----,_%,--_4 ,,,_"-_-(.;-;,,,,,----,-- ,,, ''W,.,,.------t.-','4,-,'-, -,..A ,,• --_-_0"-,<=""=;;,,,,00-1.-- .:4 -.0'0:,Aki"'" .* '-'' --"‘-', A• 4--*''' "'. ,-,„--,--„-:.- - • . , ,,--0-*"-- ,-,,,„0--,"; •. 0r',"--**.„04":":".-"- - .;0- .v'0,00 #,,z' ,,,,, ---,--,- ,-- ..., A,--• "---, ac•-'•-,- ,,,,,,,': , - :-,--- -t-.-; .",'','-'',:',•,' '',, fA„,"1---,-.'-,-2- • - ,-.,..,- ----- 44-# .?-- - ---:--,-- -------- .„M- ---- - , - •r: ' '':--- ,-.--- , 4,7' '*".-,-,;,':Z-. - 2g3 2:1g ---„-; ---_---2----?"-/r,'---!--%%---- - '- :'' '- iilltV'"'k, - , . w - i ,- , - -",=--- ---- L,... I --,--:: :••. '-' :1'-- -'. ':%,*;f 'f;'::: ,---;i:i;;;: ._.'4'.. $' ___1— Cn i L!-,--A---"-"'"" ,,,lr„,,t-A--;,,,,, A .,-A-----' -''''.- :: --" . '=IA.:-,:-•'"-*000*(0„"*.010,1:00,00, ,--- 4. .--.---„„;„:„-, .„- -'7,-.-,=--f,::::- .-1-;-,---' '' %%ii '•.- -,. .----,------<----- , ,0--,, - „ :,: it.- :), '•' 7- c %.0 1, - ,--,,,„„-7%------=t,-.- -, -,.e, r•--,4, 1-,zo riFil-k -'-,-;--5,----,f---,--, -. .", -,---,f„;-7,----„f ---,--7-7,-;',-7,-"?..--.5 ,--77:- - -,- -- -,-,%%.. = --,-..---.---.„.„- „„.-„----„- :-— ir- . --0-- ---.-- ,,,,,,,,-------_,>-----,.%=-.<, ., - f . ,-,-- zs• 00.00,',-'00,0-, , - . 000.4 ---" - - ':" '''''**'-''' .■• '- ,0•-,/,5., -''-'' - ' --c%-- -- ,_---_. .----,,„--;,,,,--,.,----;,--- ,--,,'-,,...,_., ,,,,,,„,--- 4* 0,---.-- -,-- ----_-•,,„, --1-f,A,,_;*.--- -„f--- ' .,,,,,,,,,---0- , i IIA:- '-----,4- •,--- -,' e----'4"-T---- ;,,-,--'--,'--- ' :,-, 4 --.' -'--f-:---- --"' , - '=7'•-,.1r-'. ci) -.1 4,.;,: CI ". N <" r- W .CA N O r N CN N tN 0 N N Q) O [!�O 4 U)O (p .n! W UA O t0 N(O N N U) C�� /O/�� ''^z u) co Q V) C o N "o U u) a P. cu Z— co Ts C -O. N a m is o o 0 o a N �� ca a) C cc a Oa)a) a) > ID C CO > a c13 a Z c0 Cn 5• O O N O O C o o N N C C Q r�W °` o L iu, U U g c c c a) 0 o) o) o N co) a00 ` O ro a) a) a)Q 0 a O Q O d L7 • �, o >, � aamm o� E Qm ma) a) a) a).15,+-. � �-CI Cti U J O O [r a N O O c E 0 0 0 0 LLC 4 O C ` r .-N N CO v — C O E N Q O O O O C 2 a)U(/j L O a N vOi vOi vOi N N N > > > (n O O O WI a)O O _N N a) c 2 0 >� ro t O O D D D M N co Cn «.Q •N m uu, u0i m a) () N C i c C L O O - !d O O a a O O O1 C >•- C O O O O >.U O O x O Q N co > G 1 O N a.x N X X X X n 3.X 0 0 0 0 W 2 �Q�UWN W=�O tpO2D o 22222 0Urra 0W N000a_ C .. Q cn Y x CCI I' .. 4111 N CO Q LC) 0 N O O o o w �' s E LY cYi v' rnrn °C.0� ` MOt N ° cj X a) °0a a>._ c a °'ate a)ro ro ° > 3 c cc Ov v7) oZL~ (XO c E c o 7 c ao 2 ,- + Cn �- Em °o� 3g5c c Ncn °» >,U)'E co•E Uv,5_ ca) a) ° �, U a) a) N N p c 3 > j d 7 L r N C C a s 7 tO'�' N r C 03 O m o v ui >+ at 3 a) E o >m'a O C N R E N 2 C U Y L g E..- E•0 a) O 0 E J a) C 03 N•c ro al co= p C t0. > a7 C N in N N ` U E LRU aco cc= OE3pENom•- cacDo yomLEZ a) O cti >c• o U N N o)N >, co 7 Q Z O > U'L" >Y a._ a) f0 7 ay co c a ca Y CLJ a)-. a) O c N> o o cn ; V >;7 ro N y FL- y°f CO r m r U aj co co 7 a) c a) N a 0 7 U=J_ C >, (0 O 0 C 0 L N_7 7 0 92 0 v a) E Y O O a7 a)-a Y >•2 u0i N U J N E : m a) c <- = n.w 7 c0 0 L i 0 N(a 3 E >.v'a C N L L O.L N L O C a) C O C C Q C+ U vci c ° ° ° -° c° > vNi o ED. >'o� .. -tU o E rnr E c�°o °-`7� w E ca ° o cco ° .o �y 75-4_, c a 0 0 0 0 °0 asaoo o•9 c N E N rnY.'0 N a) N Oo a) a�•ERaa) a�° EE). Omcaaviv�? cUE vooin �'u) 7oa a). cc,�oN o. n Lv x a) >.•c a) c 9•� O� 4) � ° E � ,_ c o O aci i 7.c_C O N in C N O C ac) N ,L U , 3 'a N U C o C O v 5 L O O O v O p) O a7 7 3 L a) 7 a) v E N D7 N N C O a) U a) C• `� U C C 7 O-p a3. y c = E o 0.' >0 a) 3 ` L a c c T r 0 ca-o x m u) o o•c cn p c o aa)) a) a) ,' E o e N O N O L 0_O•w « N Z cn• y v m 3 E C 0 L L L 77 Cr)to N V— a O co 75 O C N >.0 2 O c O c 0 0 N L O CC)) > O as a L V 0 0-a O C N.� O N =sbE.� ca`5 O3c Eo3ca- a Z Ham .-'vNEP. a) oo HoZ _ a)vooNCEo > C Y a) L C .N. N T a) a)c0 (NO N ca o O C o a) if) o C r.-2 ,3 o;c E c N L «. 0 M c > L y ? p E L 'y O p a) C i 2 0 y 0 (0 L O L y N y 3 c`O 0 Y of; N c L >,j v x N L co p _ C E c O•y c m 0 7 > j c �` O C c._ =C - c0030-c0 C •o C N E o c 0 .2 H'IHH N C H1fl 3 Hilul C 0 U N 0 7^U o 0 3 i J U.. v-a C Y O >, O• Y t a y (c0 ccvv o a) a).:o ; 2 E >2aa N L °L o cv0 .L.. c.a E. W >° a) N 0 2 0 7 a)o N (p j O) C O c c)v mz a_)° _ ov`r" ,'>Qv L U L ° c �3 N a� o m 3L °m a� 2 a)c) N U L ^ a) N U N N C 'd c 7 N a) c y a a)y L N .L. N ° L N N C c0 U >Y O in a)o X "a a) -a om y �c „....„-D c aci 5� w aai_-2 c o� ° 'x v � rn ° co «. N ai° co a) O 'O C 10 N 'C Q'ECj�,°o a).2 3 a- cU co ca-_ m °o E 5 4) t• o.-(E1-c ayy a + N C N U r 7 a)Q v V _ N U N L U 'CO- 1313•-7 a t- a) as E 7 o co O 1=1 a)- L a) E 7« CO 7 co N C O a`' N a a•E 7I-" N y 0 O C•"= WL2m O a).c N O p 5�L �Ya� c -0 ._ 03 � NC «. o fUIUfl� �L Uv� 3 ° at N $ mL i0 c co o•; a� °' 02a) 2i � c3ovo �Uocco Ea)N m T N.LO„ O '- a) (CO...'� N >. Z d a I . C 7 3 C O U 7'a ca?`O.co W -0 CO aNi C n.J O a y O i.E O E O C U:N L C O c'- >.7 E f0 N C Q. E a)i ca 3 mcca Q :.v Qr c U ca ca UH v o N O 0 Lel a CC I- . 0 •463 E 8 Z o E su) L.I.J cn Q 3 3 CD a) a n CL a o 0 o o 0 0 7- (0 N > > N G) 717 c E E )7( •X O O a a n n < < 311Y4 90 ��`` /may Y � :4 � • 3 * 4 1M f-w. - •j ., - , ♦ . f 1 e / • • , e ` -. t 6,' M f. J S 4- -#s YSe O N m a a c = o L▪ O. C V W EU o o ~o . m i g it g Z °• ° � c c°�° c� � CO Q o d c a W °' V ? T Eo FA- E w E.4' E o• m _�L c ° w 2___I Q v i� w E> E p>. Q w Q LL Q v ct 2 a) o w t E 0 o `° y CU CT) o F= Z ° O• " m .• 73 o ai 0 0 hi't 0 W -G ?a 1: :t" 2)E "5 II • • Q Q 3 !n w U J C fN W TLA CC D Z Q C/) yo z--- 5' 1.T «. • i.- t i , L , P W • V E a ` Z ,1- CDr f -t').'1,- s- �� v.4 'Co' W i Cl) I — •,-rye _ W .�. a a n IC:anp•••q.-4,'1. • 4 0 N O tip n a in y i i ii0i / (n fn c •i + S W / O m O C M E i w m (U m a n .• ar N co 3 7 CY [r r to m 0 r Z p• "4.-o U Z L.LJ i t c C y ° c0 N Z • .0 U' ' �� , Z m w >, 'C U C O Z U7 V/< Z y �, a) CO c-C c c O / i«.tG `� x m CO U U p Z h .� ,2 i i H C m = c .c C W O cc E/d 5 / l C!! . x - c 3 " E Z o Z %� i r. Q co U ° — y p = = �� si 0 O ° O W W -ii i //i ,� y -� ° o E U U t- J J jQ/ ,.N o ri c y O O m O Z m m -n � / $ y /ice 2103 C m b o L a U O ,. � I �� C _ G1 ,u'..-- 0 U .N. Cn y r�y-. � � (�w c y m 0 ao Z i Q- �� mss, '-f� 3. >'� d C� m S O ' fl Y4 ix p r,f m Q 2 S J o a c m W m 0 Z 2- a a_ 0 311Y4 5'0 VI _ tY O o F- .--; -,-; .,----'''4 . .., ...._ . • : „.,.. •.. - mss. s _ t'M...... ,-• 0, -, • • • . - 5 .. 3 . K 4 • * E JP 0 0 a 6 S • 2 G N u-I u) Rf • V/ C/D .J J .„ yfj,j j '` ice/ yii ,jam • /- s fig i /ii-/"� j Frei!/� ��iij y :jai/yam igy e 'S cv T a W c W g. _,,,,„ ,, ccI— ,.,....... t:' - z u) C� co a CI Z 4 N p 4 ..; ....mow sc.:::: '. .** .^^ <. , f - -..Mat ,44,, .......... .i2 .1(f. .ria- �iYYWW _ ii(.3+ li'illif144 , i . ilka 1ra a a ,rr. w • rn iii - iii /j �i � ' ; : IN i' -�may. s Z N O 0 0 Ti cn = nc:...,::,,,ip V Cn c a'� r f C )~W = sue" ..! /40 ''''',..: -'-- 1; , ,,, a" may% _ -" '`_ / i//ice i 0>" '` '- - -s, - jam%�, - 147 t i , ii/ i may . / iy l f. i �i%% %%� ice" -- ii i •%� v N�%ice/� j� j Ts a I-I-I �$ y ♦: C Z � '_ 'v W E o L N CO ��j%/ Af ii/%iii , t, -ft I-, , i,,,,,_.„ — __:, 'l'-',_ i fi s' �,* . i. 4 a� � w 4 ,J ,. I rillir— II- Na . _ ,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,irv,,,,,,„4„,,,a,,,,,,,,,,,:,______ ___,,_>________-_,.4_i/%iii , ,, , ,,,,„ a 0 O 9 N_ Q AN,, W — cn 0 zQ I,--f N ig _ 1 �,� ,.I-, ','-o.,,,i,._:-ce2 W . , , 9 r- . _ _... , ......„ , ,.......: ...,..: _.. _,,, . ,„,,,,ii , . _ _,,,,,_ ,, ,. .. , c,) , , ,..„ . _....„.„..,....., , :, , „...... .. ,,,„ , a . , CD N ,a- „,,,;,„, -- , _--- - L.'11-5---14-:' _ , ,„I II ,.. „ .,1----- * -- '- ii , _. „.., i - T ---. '- I I 0.,- --,-.:,_ il:,:: I I ‘, ' 1 (9:,:,------=----- -------1 .. I 1 i „ i .„:„ _ - � ., A low ,_ „,,,,,_ „ c <” .: ..,,,,,,„„ 5 or - i ( ' 1.-- p-,, ir—_-_,,,,,, ..____::::::: , _,,-- eid,..,..4*,,::1 i -- -- ----- '.." — 'T '.- -. --,-- -- a 0 0 --� _ I , `'NI g '... : ,-,_- _ ° I ,,:,,,,,,:,, 'i_.-_,:-:-.1_-; cv„ ,_, t .5 ,--- 4 ,.,. . , 4 / a ,,,....-„, -, - -,1 ._, p -i- . ..� .. E. a O 6 0: - ,,;,- .„- .. , , :::::__,_,-,,,::_:igliy-,e1--1:4: :;:-,,,r, ,..,44, .. ,,,,,-- - ' .: .„.,,,,±r,,v,,„.e.r:,,,i ,.,_:::„.:. . .?:,,, et,Jift,N,..=, ..,,, ( _ , -.- ,. ,- _:„.--,_.--;,- -_- _,-.,,:-"AtiO,77,fif saw r 'y i tt_,:itli!:,:lii,VI!,,gai- ce -_, itIr ,. . _.....!.,,-.i.<„,,5-.2,;-;.;:-..„ „:„„ v i a • l9 + 2 C L L �� Z z z � � i= t= ,— (y) cn cn /� X X X V/Q ! ' _ w w w O Q O J m W Q m 1 mill 1 .:. .. E m v o 3 W 0 ro O \ 3 o 0 . m M= 3 as CC i -n, W a Q Z L LD o In N N N i\ N N • ■ I 1 s S,,'c y xy 4 S'•' m F— c�0 ir. 0 c- - ''', , y ,,,,, ,,, .,7, „di f.,, :•_,, :,, .0 o N - ,, ,, , CD .03 0) W Cimm 41n f • (O 1�', O N as a _R t (s C N - N �_ V_ Q N N T ° o f0 cc O 5 Z. •• N CD R w w w = cla c 0 0 co C.) 0 0 0 N I- • , :',: '''',,.,,,'',':',,:':' '' . .i'' - : ,' .':..---' ''' i I � � 0 N C) u......1:1 ' . '' '. '.. --'' ' -' ,, .0,.''', ,,,,, ring's) . ..,., ,,,,,, , is 11 w �' 1 I��• ft a . : , r 1 flu 1 I } h. 11 e it � 1 � -� 1I �- r ! °ill e) O u) 7 J 0 X CD E al•■■ ■• f) O O c- ∎1- Ln O L� i : mill 3 e+ - i l E--WO O . o a N a. o_ a- W E0 C� lo -o a, ■I E Iii Ti I - CD W _� N O O L. a ■ _{_ vs J w LT, LT, � - w O D pp �� (c2 J + /V�Q v __- .- - - _, Z Z W w O p J p W u_ J i= - J a' ‘H- 7- W ' LL p -;�/ i c � a : i ''. W ' 0 0 Q Z W 1 C/3 ,y W v ■■ ■ J Z w p CC rir tW U,- O 1-- a w a t a. -if)-- v Q a ii W - ' '.-..,- w Ln W U O J Z W 2 cc Lu U p O d a _a p C_)a _ X U U r' 2 La- - J w -1 U m W - ---- w O 1. :' T"' ''"----71 _ill '02'1, ' ---"-' - ' o C-1 1r , . ,,,, ,,,,s:,;,,,,,,s,,,,,,,,„,:sr,,,1 . a�� W J 0 Q Z Z ___ c;.., W d•Z - S _. W U 1 U U i w = a 0 o w J Z ....... O U O ..._. ' 011.1„,,,;,! i',:' , ,Cim 1.1 W ,_ o v c� � � J CC v ' o N O a CI M + d U 03. W V Q WI _ • Q y : 3 a oJ {0 cn a w -u_�c� . w< } W U . : .______ Z , : ,._+____ 7—7' 21 , , : , , ! " F— p ■ W ''';'.:''''','•;',:‘;1 C113 U1 . a Z ClD • W Z __ CO J W V _ Q DN Ws ,, Z P.y _.. .i .- .-' , . . :., .. . .. , .. ,, . . • . , , , , . . o ______::•••• ...._•• L ---- ,,,, ,,,, ',,,,, • -, ,_._.. . . . , . . , >.- • , .,. .... . .,,,, ,, . , ,. . . ,1-- .__ ,...,_ ,. . _. . _ . , ., , : .,,,_ , c_1 . , , , , ... ,,,, .. cl_ . • - .,, : i, cr) -_-.__ ... ,•.., cc , .. .,.. , . W i . . . , , , ., g., ..... . .. _. N fiL C,, W CD LU cc CA m a G)Np " "d a +• . Er c M y a 0 a) Q .. , ` c p as E v o = r p p . ▪ C n °)!= g• a a3 c � a' y Ern E >: . Qo � o C 0Z Ya 2 - C 0 �� a _ s rn ca " 0ac a) co a. = a 5 N o O N LL Y o•_ 0)3 _ ? 5 a) L )� ay }m 70 fl y o °W �� Oa, 'u)=.o .a m e a m o mrn e z 2 o m a) Yp Np w c, . ca op v °, a �LO)aY a c a v O O L c 0o N a m � E a a� Y w r c a as a o 2"w W Oa a L j a) cCOm c U CU a E o Y as as c p O o .0 75 CB v O C c V N ca y c O co „ O O-° 0a- as l p 3 i p- O > v N a C N y p E a p.d d ca O a > a E CC , y t m 12 s 3$ ca a>,o a o v co a G a� 0 ` ci° •p ca� p > c c o o �CC o a a_ ca- c 0- a)tea) m Ea c p � p ap o > a a 0 c a i - c � a a o a) Imm p p a 7 on a p o a) L O � o N c m N c E �� pro g; • a) vi .w rn- N Y a) N C` a G w a a w L 6.U C c Ci) V a t5 N 0 9 c.-i a)r" o o a) c E � a o o p a a) O m 0 i c m J v r Q 2 L a ¢a m _ CC Q C CC c.) 2 o a a) >.N O w 0. al > C Y p c O a m O O a) ca E C a) d o N _ CD 3 cr, m p c U vi O O paw CFt 3 ' o 36ca paw o Op• rn 0 -W W<aca`) 0 Ua ° � >, v �� aci 0.a `° °`�' 2 0 „; ooV o a p E �a aC 0 o = m N C u! L a o as U .` 01 • C v) c L' v) fa lim O a a N ° O ca L L• O cn 8 ca a LJJ a) >, T C V N C0yo v)a a) o 0 0 o p > o E O j, .. U N a_L O to O a U • fa a p c j N U C.0 y J E ur N N O a) °1 -. as 7 c U 0 C a m 92 0 O 0 Z E c �Y as = a ■ aiaai N 'y 7 O j EU o▪ a,a J • ' o� � U CD O C N ca c)a Z pca p2 0 O as cc to C E ° C c J as O C E Co cr,in _ X Ta O WN O T> CCI N O as co co N O _I CM 0 != o 3 +c o CU `=�N y C� o 0 a c Il a)"a)2. >8 E as -O r .- � a) 0— CD .a)L > C M al o -.a) a � c U O O O' c0 T 0 �Q W a C U"- O p N N Q 0 > ,oco a 3 O c E E C a . te0 w N a m a' ,oac a a > y° a •� m ° c 0 0 O 0 c ` ro.ro C � >13 a) E 0°C Ea � a U > a O-0 i' E•>• c a) a m 0 L E o ill))2c...c3 > O a a Y `m O° 2 O= OYa a 3 E ro as arno a > a rnU U ,- c_.-(1) ` y U Q a O c o c ° ac y a 2 5 a O w Co as c c a) T ) N U E' E N 8.)p a U a U 8 L N E c a 3 0 a).5 � c s c °= C aa) Q c c O u)d> a) o� ac.- s2� oU fl m N cc c � y° _� yrn = C O y O coaOcaa) °)� E N c0 w y ,a.' E a)�Yca U L O a 0 O . a 7 v)a a) iU) y rn U O V icC d a) ls° � °0 corn u) cv LE v co ImINEN ■ Z W D =" i�� ice j%/ �%' r it i ice- . :-71 i ?v , i j f" 0 N i O N N d C W p Z d CD J CO 4 ' • o w W o I V CC 111 Z J J = N W W LU Q O W O Lu CC W W W W I-- W W p W W 71 I = — — W ± CC Z c = O Y p J �J p Q p p p z CJ p < o p O Z J O WX w X >< >< O p E ac = I I I 1 Q _ j �; s s 1� W { •t 1+Ylt♦tl III IINry� j/N IN IIIIfIGIII}Ilt Iif111N!lIIIYIIItY'Jk 5 �1NN\Y,:{I1 t 1 111 1 fl f 1 1r1;tiV11 �-- VY11Y,,:11 ,,tf,V ! I - - 1 e ,..x l.tr f.l,f.l\ ��•11.1{.t 11:f 1{I I t 11 t- j',%�- .��-i \!Yl:li.tl'f.r It,. v,t,Jt.,,,�11 r f!.,'li•f.:.,,:I:Itvrf xl�'''' "'i.,tom' �Y111NIt,•Ittl :Nrff.i:tl•,Illtlf::tl•`I:li//!= cp i--- cc 0.... N N IMIMMM U) W W W + W W n n a a Q W a U a E� Wig° o o _ O CC io g rS o) o) , .= N in 7,5 cn a 0 X N N (O r) OT c•) O O J T T (� T Q V) Q J U cc Tc 0 ›- O 2 w L CC 0 Z Y (0 000 TT)i u o= Z Y >I w m CL I- a H CO cn U > > a O a 0 0 Q W al) o w o o a Q o0C 0 Q O d w cc UIR LL, O —J —I W I a. cn U) U) C7 O a a � I \\ kt' , W it),\#, i , . M /' S — - / \ \ mm.l.w L i U U U U / L.L. LL LL. \ /' .,\( ,,/, ., 0, ,....„.0,4'..0.t'...fl'.{?..9 I.',.9.,II.'.9,21...$1,1'.9-.91.0-S1 U) Cr) CO w w W U) � 00 cnU) CI) I L O N O 'N 'N C CO T L O L ('7 in' iii LL'^ 0 T QV/ V X 0 (C, In O O O O N N O (n T T co J T T r) T Zr H (/) CC < J 0 z 0 2 H u. CC O 2 CCw O N Q - Q • Z Y 3 dp N 2 0 Ur W W W O cn 5 I v, L m d H D_ H U m 0 Y 5 D 0 a • 0 0 ¢ W m o w o o ,-o o_ a Q CC < O w CC O —1 —I U- I a 1-- U) u_ U U) U) u. (5 O a cc cc a 1\ Vo:2;\ A. s 1:4/ / A4' / ) w w w w w w LL LL LL: LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL / \ \ • O o O o O 0 (,/,/// , s .. o-ss O O m N a I- + d W n v a a a cca- a a W o o g5 5 E ° CC LO O o di ° r co N 1— cn a Vr O x Lo CD h. N co C) O 0) O O J LLI ii uj 2 Q U 0 O 2 W IL Z C7) WI y - L Q CC 0 co a O C3/4 0 o _ Z N �_ H Y a p a) 0 w w c`o m Willm O cn 5 2 m t Q d H a H ccn m U Z 5 5 5 o a a) 0- 0 0 ¢ w al) o w o o ¢ cCC LL Q O O UI . O -I -I U- 2 0- I- cn U_ U- w w U. 0 O CC CC a ;a T` .PZI 9.Z1.B'll o-Lt A'9t W \ tir j. •k <it,U{ , Z Z Z u§ ce cc c4 1 \ / \\' '#, , � 4\\ c‘ � fit' ---�--- ---- �\ / ^ .Y \ :iA./t�.�+I1�.7Yt�.lhYl�.P.1:A*A iA'Ol-0'AtJI'At1YAl ASt t aso A.%t u) cn o, w w w cwnU) a as O 0 m 0 U) n u)a) ' 0 0 0 w co O 8 O tn O co iii in LL b O X a N 0 in O O � 0 0 J r C,) ,- Q I- cn 2 Q - U Z Q w LI To Q OJ D CC O Z U) 6 L g w co 0 0 0 Q w w Y .D 3 d 2 p O w w w O (n 0 2 m L m a I- O - ( O 0 - > > 5 C7 a) u 0- 0 0 ¢ w ate) o w o o a .-oo Q Q Q w O CC O J J LL 2 d - (n tL LL U) c n 3/4 I. 0 0 a. 2 cc d \NI:, / i /\S\ �'�/ ;41/ 3 _ - ' /X04 / / • • / Y •� a1 .' A'b{ kO ,.Rbt.O.f hAi a N a W u v a a a a W 0 e $ 5 55 Eo CC o o ° n CO CO,-- = N Cn Q Cr) cn N cn O X co in in I� N r co r) OT c) O O J N co ,- N r Q J W CC 65 Q Q Q U ‘mm. Q Z >- O H ti a O a 0 w tL cA ro Q J O c Z N �_ H m Y - o „ a) 2 0 o w w w ccoo 0 cn 5 I y L m Cl- H a_ H co 0 0 Y > > > o a wcE a 0 0 Q w (D o w o 272 :2 o Q CCC tai Q O O IIII U.' O J J u_ 2 a H cn w tL cn cn w 0 O a C< CC a 0 W X \ - \ / / .-, v/ V) Cl) w w w tL L.L. Ca (a a < a o 0 CO cn cn .a) co O N O O _ f• r (A )) LL 8 cn co cn N 8X lA N O co co r O M O O J • N ,- C6 .- Q J W < to a Z C< Q Q 0 g W O 0 w tL¢ m W• Z Y D N 4) N p 0 W w w N Z N M t- 0 m o 6 3 m Z W Z CC Ma O cn E I 'd; m a d N cn 0 Y > a 0 0 Q W ate) o w o o -_°'o P. CO LL Q wW w cc O J J tL z a I- co w w cn cn u. 0 O a ac CC a \ / •9E / =a Tr \\' o { o N a + N W � u �.o W o Cl- � o CC N N C6 o L[) OT D a) N CO oX in N N N LO in in N • _i LQ T T C� Q r Z w } Z cc J Q N Z ro m1- 0 �a cc o -- m w w -c cm CC Z a`3 cn 6 y 2 U- ~ UUn 0 0 0 V Y CO w w 3 Y V O m a� 0 Z U w w w w L i« . . Z N H Tu F° O d o 3 j Z w Z OC OC O a d N O v) O 2 , L m Cl- I- a H cn Y > a- 00 Q w m o w o o d a_ Q ¢ w Q O O 0 ' al O J J LL 2 a J to L.L. tl cn to u. C7 2 a 2 2 a �+... W C/, ydJ 1 \.�•�` iiiiz / \ \` \ \ \\ `\ `\` /`,, J AAi.PAt.tYAtJYAW A/AAt-0'Sl A\ �' /:/l4r//, � • \ , , \ s v \ a C (/) 0 w w w CO a a a O 0 CO U CO a) aa) v o o In o O O N N r N LL 0 cn � f` 8 x in N N n in N N b b J Q r T N Q w >_ Z 2 2 J w Z CO 2 2 H J Z 3 r m 2 Z 0 w w °a w 3 Y a a p w O (n 0 2 . ~ zr, m a H a_ H u) D a Y 5 5 5 CI- 00 ¢ w 0) o w 2 2 v v Q CCC w Q w w L7oC O J J LL 2 a J fn w LL U) U LL_ 0 2 a 2 2 a / • \ ` �, 1111111 ,\ f�._ `\`\ `\ \ -,1:==.l \\\ j `\ \ / ,PAI.PAIhAI.JAI.(tAtAQI.0-St ■ \ / "./ // *I 4 v 0 N O O N d W LLI L11 W c(ncn cWjUU C � Q QtL QLL (a• W � � � 88 u_ CL E CC c c::)_ o ^ M 0 0 o co T o T Cip ui T V Q 8 x to N N N N J Q Q N T C�) T Q F- Z Z cn x Q J p N z r 0 2 Zr 76 ru cc W W Z G) Cn � m L Q O a U x x • °° • W 3 Y v °) �, g O z Ur W W w c :° NI NI Z N 2_ 1- U a� a Zr), p Z W z ' ' -19- 92 a O U p = in m a f' d H U p _ Y p p > N a 0 0 ¢ W a�i o o w o o = = ¢ CC w Q v O III' O -I -I L.L. x a. _1 I- co LL u. u. 0 CC CL CC CC // yyy, \ ,; ;/] i3S:v1S3d S1 S / � \� , Y N o .i.2 Z E C K C W T / \ 'of ` \\ 1 /IIk 0 0 O N ) A N N A o r � \ \ \I\ `\ oW ` & zaW X / \ / gn00 //// / \ \ \ ,/ '/j/,/ / l \ \ t ii ;'/i// [ \ / i \ J/ Ndr813S1V.S ;: I}F }I `\ /' %///• /' A•.o1-00,�hniY.t.0 Di:0,0'1D Cf 4 -.n .0 .tt5t / \L.L../. it �sr Cn Cn Cn W W W LL LL U U U CO a CL 0_ 4) y 0 0 U cn U II) 0 0 rn co 0 0 0 ai o) o0 w in m in rr I,. O LL 8 T Cn N 8 x h- N O N In N J Q N T N T Q W } Z cn x Q cc p Z 2 H U ti Er Q J M x x Z 3 3 G2 W W W aw Yv � ) 0Z 0 Z N 2 1— To H Q H 0 p Z W Z x x p O▪ U p N a L H co p p — p x >C7 ° aam ¢ w O O CC a 0 0 Q W as o o w o o v _a Q Q O -I -I U.. x -I I- Cn LL LL Cn U) LL U x Cl CC x LL i.\ Y_ ;. `\ Y \\ " 40.1.iviS_-Gras - / \ `\\\ L � g g g i k vi ui ai �t6 �A - \ ill \\\\\,\ . \ ,,.t 1iizziiirilie, T / \\ \ ( 1 \>) W W W W W W // O � O D O O,A. �( / \A` (A CA CO V) V1 (A` \\ \\ \,‘ , \ ` /\ \ s / /, /%/ z z z \ z ` //;////,././// \ ' / \ \ / / i { \ • i v >11 TJj230j,D i ',Dn.oio-.oiaDira..0-D DI.PA**•Dl✓:s 757/ \__ , .0•.5r ' N • .... p O , LI—I u) u) u) + . co Lij LU 111 CU•— = to u) o 0 0 o 0_ CL CL 0 LLJ 8 O -rn' Tii oi L6 ,... 0 co (.0 1.-- 0 • ,- — 3 U) = U) V' N .— (1)1< LL b WiC cn tc‘i o 0 X Lr) b io in b b it) it) j Cr) co .- c) Tt• N ,— N Lr) Tr I— < = Cl) LIJ CC Cr >- CC -J Z 111 < Ze a Z 2 1— (7) To ...■1 0 >- 0 cC 0 —I 2 crLU crW v.-- C CJ) C7) WI -E-6 < __i < D — — ca c ■I Z CO •• Lu co I7) ,_ r„ 2 U- R.' CO 0 0 0 LU Y -8 c) 4) '<r) 2 oz Ø W W W .55 ‘- ° 4:=1) z N 2 I— c71 ° C D 0 l n Z ,_,I-U Z __4 ,-CC g 2 a 2 < 0_ ).-- = -,7; - . a_ 1- u) 0 ,--. R- D > '6 m - - C-.) g " 0 —I _I LJ- r 0- I— U) LL LL in u) u_ 0 cc a_ cc cc a. . • C4r) LJ—I \ / Cr) \4, N , = / t \,,),. \.1, g g g / / c=i / ./ ‘ )., / , ., \ ,,‘ .\ , ' \\ NAVA / LI—I / , / /. , : / / \ s , . / / , \ i X \\ / •\/• / . \ / , / , // ,„,// , 1 gl$ -g $.4 g i 4‘, / ., \ ,/, ,,,, / / ii.iiiii .i ;\ / 1. \ \ / / , . / / 7/7 \ 1 , K\ ./. \ ,•\\i , 4/k. \•< ;. \\ 4 it..4 , • -a \ / 4 CO cn u) U. LLJ LLJ LLJ co LI- 0 0 0 u) < < < o La Ln 00 CL CL EL 00 a 0 u) u) u) o o .- 00 — Vi in' t 6 0) 1/- I- - 0 T u_ b U) in cm o 0 X u•) b in ir) bbbb _I N. Ln ° ..a- o N LO _I < CO .— Csi •,- Tt I= LL >_ Z rr CC -J I-LI Cl) Z 0 0 .5 LLJ LLJ Cl) 73 Tri CC 0 -1 cc cc Z U) 2 TA , 2 u- p co 0 a o < Lij w Y -0 o a) 2 a z 0 LLJ L1J Lu Z N 2 0 w 0 la3 0 z w z .=cc cc= _a 0 (7) 5 t‘ < a- I- 17- ,_ ,_ ,i (.D scil t IT -8 8 a) a) cc c? Co cc 0 0 0 0- 0 0 < W a) 0 w 22 :2 32 < LLU-I < LUI-LICC 0 -I _I LL I 0_ 1-- co u_ u_ cn cn u_ 0 11 i , ,?t 1`. 11 , /1 7/ 1 -(--, / \ •\ al cd 4 k \.\\/ \ tit. \( 0;\ \ \ k\\ 41.-1/i\, loInto..a.o....n-..cr.ciAraLArmix.atio-ot.3-s. c, \i ''''',.. ' • a-sot •",v ' ' N a W u, u, co + a W L ° ° o r N O O CO ^ O O yy r r p � N �Q U_ O r V/ 8 X o %c) in in .- O O O Q u T N N J N C+) r I- N Z Z CC J W U } 2 H Cn • 3 Z w Z O E CO Z N MW I— U W p D M CC 2 a E occ O m 0 i in ,_ m - 1- a• 2 m D 0 R 5 7 j o o w O O a 0 0 Q w- w o w 2 v Q CC Q , 0 J J LL r a - m LL LL CO Cr) L_ 0 m a ro m a + "' Y tj try. E a. X �, 4//////// „,,,,/ i / \.,, / '", ��, t I / v N. N1N / \ ifs` 4 MO •4 CA u)0 up L L L L U U U .97, U U u) cn 00 00 a a a (1) a) o o 0 0 co — ° rn o w v o u_ V r Cn N g x N N. O O i1) 0 0 J Q iri N r N _ Q H Z Cn cc Q J W Z m Q 0 0 2 I- w w 0 m - < O J 0 m [L Z U 'n M W 1- m 0 0 0 a w W Y 3 �p• s_, 20Z O W w w Z N o m :ti m - - a F2 U D 0 Y 5 cc cc 5 5 O co D = v, - ¢ a � P H H C7- -o a, H a a n a> m O U m 0 0 0 --- -0- 00 ¢ w a� o W2 o :232 ¢ m w Q w w CC • O J J LL S a F- U LL LL co m LL 0 m a m m a / i At. �� ' i M ; , ,\;,044. cl)--3./;/-N . \\'‘\\?(:1 1 st\ , // \ ' 1 F / � /�` 1 { 'z z iii ' \\,k, '/ / // IV VIIIIN . cl g. 4,7 /// Y ?\, / / i i ' / ,/ ,, b X j fil Y � ' OSr E)O kit ' .701 if •* '/ .,. C.D cip L.0 c=1 Cf) Q C/) 0 r> CC O C • O cn a W Z W e , . - Z J J O C-1 • i r N O O M a W C al Q J �� ,O i / ' y // i jam/ I %' - I j i ,- CO W c W_ CC 2 � O 0 m O N L Y n U -0 O 0 X_ Y p O U f� in in O O to I Cn N Y 5 Y F- To U N o I-- To U «a co C7 o a> H a> N - -a m -0 CJ Q W a) O W N O U LL 2 ti U) I-- lL 2 IL I- Cn d I- F- ,� y N � x W m ,I11 ' 1 ,,,1401--- - � !IL,, ,, ice/ y o N. N C7 d W a _ ± ro co n aroi a� _ t4 Z w ° m o� °47. c �C) W o w Fa c X F- a� a a> co-0 o g a� m C N O N O N in W Q 3 -p o O p cYII_O tL.0 p N O U g C - U Z in i() 0 0 0 4 . - O . -`p N 3 N O O N t() U U O ro O O O - O• -0 O c c E a C i C 0 C O p C� O U-a ca E.O C.0 UO N.. to O U N nro a u� ° oL ate' _ Q ro c a> 5 c� N- `m _ a> as c (� to' a� m aNi a� o C 2 C o co a a� p -0 Q w m a w o o -a ►- - d Uz a.. cn E Y� w 2 F- cn F- (n , 40 ./ CO i t / /�/ /ii / '-y % 1 / ��x .ice �� j / /� CC si- , �/ ma yr a 1 7 i __,- _, , ,,_, . ,,,-- .- „ ,_. -_ ,__ _ - ,i-,,,w,[,,mi:1,.,:v,:=7,a--„,,_:4 _,, ,- ,., . ,i,i,,,,,.. -____ - .4 _,-,_*..-* „,, lir:_.. -zyzi*,7-0,,,, .. ,:<,,,,,,:. _ ,,,,_,,,,....:__, _,, _,-__:„.,,,,.. ..,..,_::::.::..,,,,, ,,,. , _,-,_, ,,,,,..,-__..cic ,-----..,,,--_,- ,,,,,,„„,------- _- ,:),,,„.- ,-;-_, ,,-.,.,-,_,,;,=„).,, ,,,,,;,„.„„,,,,,,-,---,,,._„....>,,,.. .., ..2„.... .______ _ .._____,...,„ _:_,,,,s„,„ ,..,,, „,, ,,,,,__________ ...,,,-_-, ....„,,,..:-„,,....„;,,,,,,-, ,...,_ ,.,,,, ,,,, ,,,_-_,„„,i.,,„-, ,,,..„ :.z:,„..:_:.....,...,..:,.. = ._ ,____,,,,,,,_. _,__ _.,..„ ___ , ,, 0,--„ 4 -t;;._ __i.,.,__ . t ---- ;,x_t_ ._„„0„,..i. ,_,,,,_,:-,,i; 4„„..,....„. .. .. .. , :,.,„: - // o o. i; in. , o m Cl) w c w_ '5 E F O r O 'n 0 H m F- o Cl) o m �() w g U -O 0 A O _IT] f p O In O O-' L[)u [r) lf r N Q O O C v L U)O Lf N N U To N p �' u U n - w 02 w n j Q S F- (I) F F-O F- tL NJ ----':%-,%-7,?--',-;„-;---,---. ------ ----'4=-- -"'" '- ''* .'- :=:-':'-- ..„,r„W ,� / „_,,,,,,„„,--- :„,,,„...„ , ,,,,,_ ,_ J ,„ .,..„,, , ,L.,,,„.. ;m _,, „ %�Q / ,:-, 3.„......„ ,,,,, ----.,--,_-_,/,A , - _,-,. , ,2>,, ,zk, OJ F y �J x -,::--,41t ,_ ,I,.: /- ..,- ,.._.,,,_;..._,,.; ,x,ii,,v,,..:;:,.„,:,,,,,,,.___:_::::,: -2, -_,_,,I ,,,-_, ,„ , , 1__-_,___. _ ,_ ;,,,_._ _,. :,.__-- / - .„,_, ...,,.„..J.---„,__.: !-'-;&-Vi:.-AAn_:,-1:-'i., i i s ,% ,,�Z '� a --- -agog -- ::- - .,4 s fn N. a a — - d a)- }a To C o o W 2 Zi Ts V o o o R� � �� `° n X 3 V)T � � 2 a n ca p a) �� a _ co Q W p F- _ d N in O O 5 N 2 C./3 i = ( Z in in o 0 0 • a) 3 ° o 0 -a c� d' T N In U U n Y ro O O - co O a)• a = O = O N— N g C N. N a •' O �Q .J Y 3 , ° 0 v a m w '6 - o o° $ ) E. a_ U nF—:-C7 i aW --Q o o w LL 1 ji � - is:,, „.,„:„.„,,, r ' ..... , -......._. „--_,. -, ,0- ,............._ o - Annuer � may�/f■ 4 / j M i�"' i i /may,- cy/ 'i ~/ �� ..4,-,--- .. „.2,....,-, ,,,,, _,„...--,,,,._,-,-...._____>.. ->„...->-._ ,-A _ ., „:„.. , _.., .,., - -,,,,,,,-- „, .,, lip 7 • ,,i,-.-, 1 - ,; - m Z ~" 0 I:0/ N N.% mt ' O T co ]) U = w w _ 0 cc Lc)_ m 0 a) co U O co 2 D 10 U -O O O � )< Y 1 p O 2 O i In -, in N T O l[) N N- n _ 1n E CD O N U) L N Y 5 F— m U Tr' F- U m Z 7 Q cc w a) o w L. o H Q w �, w �, p F- w 2 0_ F- U) 0- H F— u- 2 d U) Q NJ - �� s % % W � �� - , J y" C -� Q -.- - / - -) ,, ■114 k?-,-f,___?--_,;-%---,--_,---_,_-,%---,.-,.--,,-_--2__„_',_''-_,,--,--,,-_=,_,- ----=.,,'-,,----,-,- 2--,i,_----t.-„.,.,-. ,,.,.----_-__---:-„,_ .„„-_-------_ �%i 4':�%-..,_.._....'.,a___,_,,,-,_=,4.-,,O --m -yam �o%y?�� i- i i"/ 4 - ,yam :a = i -=.-:-,-,;-,,.,.. J / :% ,:,- Q >% / .�6i i W ®� �� %- / '4 s in ' N. A Z a)L o _ mg V o o c C0� oa a`oicO' $y G) Cl)= W . co °' °' �a O 2 2 U .,7,- P YO 0 E w i • W V C e y a�cv, ro O N C O a7, -6 Z c ° as, ro rn W Y C C V c,„ -0 0 y�° 3c aE CIi cc09m ° 2 af, Q .0 13 al E. a° %i E Y _Z j j. / , 3N11 A1H3dOHd --,,,L II it • 3NI1 A1H3dOHd 4' N 1 1 O 1 co 1 1 1 1 f � � ,iii" s � iii,° i%ice m Q Z Z O O O O J cc ri a 3 w O O o w o 1- in is) O 0 in vt O r — r, ._, „,, 0) ..:,.:........ ::,...,, .., ,,,,/ ...! . .. CO cn .c u) cnct c0 Z 0 I— .... ,,,....:„.., ...........„...... ..,..,.„... ...: „,...,„ .,.. . ... . , , : „ N Q_ „ , -A---- -1----44-1-- -t'l:' - --'- :::;I 'tK:*jj.::::-- - '"'-' ,,,,,-,f.fi-{,-)'::—1!”-,.. -'.-:,,;;-:7::=7///'.,.-„,:r-1- -'-',.---1-7::,,„--,;.,.'',._, \ -' II ;-, ' ,i • , ) CC '-i----''..1,!,t;':::1.,:',:.:1 ...'"'"'7 1.-- ,i44. ; ,-';',7,-- --,:tr,-.-'-'---4.-.-.-1,.;;;;1.5,3".= ,-.--,4'-'-'.-. ''...,-17 'I'" ,f-Utk-•. / , 1=I CC r'-;','.,.1;-;'1'''''1,:- :.:'3„-„„[-' -,,, .-,- -, ...-..-,--:,7, -k "--.--,--:'. „-:,;ii:; ---7.1e1:..'-,:,:-.. --Y.-:-.-.1'-------.-- CC C-,■/ .14.-- ,;'" .-7,-- ,,,-;.7/..;-',;,;7 ': ' --:. :i-'-----f'i.:-. ?' ... LLI I ;2-4,447 = ,,,l, r.::,:-.::::::',.::::-.2. i ; -• . .-A.....:1„--4,==z2f---'- /-74",-,gi:::',":Mfi-.-4.'''''' ---7--,..-- 7/' = LLI ! ..< v,17fr,iif,iP'il o1- -------, --, --*-5-$-.3,---i-"Fi-- -:-.-/-.'-_----,--, ,- -----, ,1--------- Up ,1:41„, : ,-)i _J ,7,1,,,,;:::: , ,.„- ,....,., ■..I ,,,,,,,,,,,r4r - - C—D -,-, ;:c-,-,4 --.7., - ,,---- ---- .._ .< a „ = .......„ ..„--./...---, „.„:„,„ ...•„... , . . ...-._..-__-_,_ , - ,,--..-..---„,„.----.-., FIj , SA CD .,,,,,-,,,--------, .--, >,. -- -..--,,- - , ,-.-,L1,--gi - --''''..;.r.{:--,Z,:,. CD CC , ,...;........, .,... .„.,...... ....„,,„.„, „,,...., - •-,,,..- -------- - --. , " ..... _„. , • :„....---- . --„„-------,,,,,,,,..„. ,,,,,,,,,,,,..,-„---. -- ..----,,.. .-, , „.•T.,. . .„..„... ,,,.....,,,,,,,---------- „ . ,, , - ..„..., • , .......- -..... Ca:0 -,--=,....--;=...,,:.3 : -."'.....-'"-' ,4, -At: ,,, , ' .) -,',----'.-:---',--- -4 -, -. - • -/--- ,--.:2--i-=- ::-4--i' -"."- --- - --•' i---' LLI = LLI >• QC( r-----_,....!...,--,, ,-- ::::;i:::-..-N - ,-, ---:::: _•,--. : - ,--./ C/D .„.„.., ---1 , - - , Z ...,„,„,....,„. ....2.......„. , .,.. . , ....„...,.„...„....„7 - ,— , : - : ,, . Z' cv ,, , , _ ■I .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,., , -, ■I Ca ,Pc 3,_ d _ � rr W '� Y/ CC I- u a v Z N , --: i -,:... ' • ' ...L... ,, _ �: Pik " .r t � ',r ter, j , i ' r / A 7,- N •O O n ch a 2 c co Z N 3 Imij FC af (0.V Q V/W O in O Y _O O in w r O N L.eD` T T a W aO in O E a m (f)w CI) w a 0 - cn w a m O in L n O cI =to . Q I�Q O v Cl) a� "N N m a �0 n f a W a(/)3 v a s r w a.)r = a .y Q U N.cc in : .::::'1.4:1.tSliAg'-:''4::--' - ,A a .obi__,,„,,':0,4 r f 444 1 i S' � '1 / L 1 z N i. _, W, . ,, ,- g m ' :1:.7-:::.,_„71,;--;-7,- „,,,, ,, ,- O / i f ij ' .. //. otit.w-110, , --: .t1' -'1-1 : *---'1-±':- -- - **-'''' -1. ci LLI , Ahoy; ,,, „g,-,-*T- _,-,-,v,-;_i-_-‘1,--, w 6 �/'y ii CMv N� N 1 / - �i Ft <yt I y j ;�/�ff�i£irJ /j 'in N y „/i i��N W a) N C C ;-' cc 8�� W C O E v� _0 �� c TO X c V p v N a� • E N e. Y Q) y U �/� > C • - c N V)Q 0. ▪ E2 = ^ v ° v ° CV (4'- o 0 c a'�'3 Y a • - p co c cfi c n, o m .- _c o a) A _ � a> L 3 p cn o ~ H U 2) c c ° ca c N 6.c cB rn Q _ t c a � d w a o o W ° N o a. a 0_ o c c.5 /- -% ice/ i , � // i/� i � //�/ /i/ � ti /i i '-may3-- may " if 'P -z..`. y% � rho 9 y ? xy mss- - /. /�! y Lc, y/ / a.amt, y y v -- - / .. i -�� y iii III•'dl! CD .. � ,rr► LLJ / ale .� CD p - '%/ _ N ~ -, Imo`= . W 7; roll g CO � /// �� 4E1 .ors. , ,.. _ Vii; --� � p AL._ --- --------4°*.* ', -40 \;,,L,1:4-4, ,o4 - --- • ------..--r---- --- ,_ ,, 4.- -.; "A 1-- „,=, -„,,,,-..:;_<:,,,-4 ,;#.. - _„,-;;;,..4,,e. ,,,,,, i , -:,A ,-.,2*,,,, .,,g, _ - _.:1 = e ��-� 7- - 41010,11%. .. ,,,- ---'• ,'4;4 , ;'--,,..‘ - ;, -714,$:-A 1,-;,-,0 Atik.4:,,,-..i . -,:-..<.-;_.""'et::::, - .W W C N N O O n i 0 ^i C7 a Co C N W °' C N r a 48 W w € m co'- CC 0 I- rn 6 N c U)Co Z as '� Cn in in o in o 0 a c°a Y co c N' v o c� v •� Q co c C\ � �� c N �i ¢ .a a)- Z. 0 CCLL Y Q ^ Y 3 p u) Q 3 co o -y ti �c o) a) Q N U U U ,p E _ ~ Q C N t N. a N , m L m in 'p 7 p O c Q Q` w 3 3 w 3 a s d�a . LL Z Cl- J Cn 12 U) � ceff t�. t y/ /� '% ,,!;'1 7* � � if i �t y j � is,27 -i i i i J /je- i /!� i j/ %t � , y �,i %y ��, ij -, -_- , /y� i -- �Lts s II/L- 5. CD r � '!/ Sri.iii iG/i 11°14. = c,-,,.-.;.-4,,,---,-,, ,e-- or, ;:::-.,--: ac %� Ill ir,Au ta N W , in-'.:.:,:,..•.:, g ,ii : m 1 F y �� W �i � lit -U Mr idil , 1—ft--_,:._-; -,- -_,- -:-.0,,- _74* ,_---- --Q � � %% sue W cc i '190, ,-,n,_7,y-, _,„4 , ,,,,,,..„....,, _,- jam/ C� 1-W �� mot= ,Ngllll� � � .. � irk Wt +x z y n Co Co 0 Z _Z N T ^in c n; I1 N W N = +r cn Lll CC 0 t r d N ca O V!Q C C 7 o CC H co QY z Lo N V Er) N ° 7 O _, O N C#) ,- U'— O C0 c C C� C fl.O c0 (0 c0LLL 'g-t n O '- N co O , i 0)O N O O C O N O Y O- O O'C cN0 H ro I- Q 0 '`-') O a� a ro • Cl- (1 w a 3 3 w 3 �_ a n`.12 CO LL T ,, y • ..ate,.. #jg s o �1i y f•-,:-• f s/- _ 1 a- '� a' � �� % ry�� t:my .w y/ sit N • -%ice ��g < s � gin,10 Q ! ... F J s ; t 3 P -----, %/O / - - ; iihoie caii-4,-f-1.--- -,--(1,c,,,,---_-- -yv i / !yam;-,,„ Cr) ///-, ti,;_-_,-,.--- � %�%/ / ,,,t,-,-,f C i yi /ice / C=I ri Z / i /' /vim y - � y� % �,..,w -q-� 3Y � /� � % � rte � --mix/ - % - o cv n a r. a Z + 2 O O` _ it a,3 3"a' c ,Rf I— `—° o v o o V L7 c° o a 3 N Lu , co y T.- na O N `. O � O O N C o Cl)0 o ` o o ' g m C a --U O m r a °0)? -2 0 Y C O N 2 0, O N N U W — N 0 5 W W CC Z s y CV 3 cc d } II I 3NI1 A1d3dOlid ii N � ,- N ,,,, iii%//% ' �- ,',"1 fg+yam; CD a z z O O a a O 0 a w cc w w w 0 co 0 O N •in in N O t ° O c., , .. en +2 c ea ea.() E 0 ,,,,, 5. cn .c u) , L r , en< , ,„-.-" ,,, „:-‘ gqi .---'-',--,,. riN-\„.: ry::-,-----P:At'4,- -----.. p---2q1 :„,;„*.iial /I-I'.-',-,Att:-.4- '• I,-,------Y: I-'-:--(7=r- 1-• --w-74.v.-,-,..-c,..,,,y; ,---,„40,,,,z,,,,g,:::-?-:x •, ,:f---.- -- ,. ----, .,,- ---,---;-;::'-, \---;------' ,_,/- 05'-' ".1i=7",-;-,,,=.',u" ,1i.:1-ok ..,..„,„.....„„.„.„,„.,„,..„,. ,=- ,,---- -,,,,--,-,:=:-/I,-,,-44,,kvaN - ,•--,/, .-,.rki '- - '_. ',,i r , , ik iAl-1 /„. '''--;?,:-:";:-1:-:.614,:-;-21:=IRR-thagN, .21%-'N I7'e--,•:-" :' ' -- 1-„, CC „., ,*-*%„, u.1 ,,,:1 gp,1-,.:„,, -,,..t-15-rkIEINtiMttitkitI I -,1 ---",-4.-40-: t-, --;Irk '--.... „•--.:',, 0ak "%t- =% kt4'0 ---__,z -2-'-----,:,::--‘- - f ,--::,vft -:-,,,,-4 7.:. ,._ . . ..-,, tw .-:,?41-N,_ -- "4„--2-------":E:"-;'•-- , I— Itg*t; f-----' "-",.--.,-,v,:*t - - ,,,,,,-7 - .*-:-:--;;'':'-- -'' = '-'41 [PO '''''';',7'177L-▪ ,-/ ,i,---'f-- 4,-,- :40 \ \„4„-.'-ff Il . • .-'-',4-4-1--"f ---r--,4-', -4-, ---„,-*:,..-_,--„\-. ,---1- ?, ZZ:141,;:".'"--- .--M9-.:,/1 ,=,:',n14/; Ih'' OW,CAtft,,-„,N, ",;„1,Y=,=1,7, \--/1.1 „'"n„, •::::. --4-,''---_, -% f---k*:-t:-i-or -- -wz.,T .,, , t" t4 ,fri;0'-,--4.3" ,;- --;-- --V::=III --:\ NI.Wiii-tktil 4,, f-.1-A ocC Wlit', 11,-,-,-:,,,,iiu,x---4,,,,zif: ' -.4„ if .\ ' ;-4,;!--N '' %-i:„---'7-: -, . --4y ,-„:" zgfr ),,, „Nig, -l'-- ,:'3.::,,,,:i.,:-, .4'-',-'''.7-i'''-':',,---,, .7 ':--*-:, ;-,---,(;/-17- ---i,,,, Ii4f cD 2_-i_k2-,tk-20*-,;- - /,, ."---t40i, --=5, ^2,t„:,.,1-..- -_,-...:-,-1,4,ef--,L----- • , ,y,,F-2,-21.!-----,::12 .— ,22-22._:-/-1,1„, -,„ . ::<,,,,,,, - , -. --"...: 70-:,;,, -4-2,:ii 1— tf2---26*,;71---,,.:---,..- -_:44,- ,,,-4*- -_-:: :----:,;,.4,;-a4V.,,-: ".1 O 41''''-:\-:'. .---.. ::::,-:::i,"--NI, .447,- .:-_.-.,..„:"..i::-A-,.--- (=> 4*--,-, '"„J-4tP-/'""7-7.--.:('- 4',- 7:11'= " -,- M/ "-,77:7--;, ,--- -,:',i'---::---:* .-r--A:::,,--,-,:, ':-,:--.--,:-.-'-:,,;_-----,---.---,--7:3,-; I— %wl..§---,:--,,„::::::::2<§.7' : ::----'- - 1,--±'. .(-4", ' -':-.--7:------.. -'4if,:,; '-'-'.ili,, '':---,-:: i LU --_,::.,:,---::::::":„.-11'',,fi-'1',::--.,1ill'-:',i'-'.:,...,-rilcA:r----..,-,‘,.-z7 --- / .,,,..-,,,,-,:,,,,, ..----- "",---,,,.Afz,/, PC 5---4-,4034 -,-- - A", •::::'1:-"-1-' -.-'=r- ------ .---4=4-43,-",- --7----::'"-:-. :,-- r ..! "-,,,,. .-iff:t--..-47,-5„----:,:''- """..•-,2,:y --•: --..„..---,i7.4-4-,--',-----,- . il r .t -.i".1 f'-.1-i----?---..'n''.-T,--,.. -----, -t t---,I,- C/3 '••---.-' i LI -;,-- ;),--44-tI7'---ifik: "-i':;--k-,;,-4,- - --,:.„•,„, *-,•4:11''-..1 ▪-. "--A-,r":-=::',;7-h:-:::-.145:, c=1 1_, 4-.,,,,,..--lit-i -t- --:, - - - . - ,,,r. -,--,...7.;.•,--) - --._ _. '.--_-'.-- : '.. = :-, - ,CV 4,.7._.,, 4,," "--,, ,/.„4----__"-wi -"'-.. ,•=:.,:47,, ..,-,,-.4/ ..\ '- *-.'' , .7444/7---;--t --------;1,--1 I:_ :'• , I „z?,,,,I.. WI- :!1:1:f":„!. . --114N::&.:-----:-: 1 .-.---;,4''',/ •-•I---- -_, \://-/.-41----0':-'-- -''''''1--- N ”" / -.- %,,,-6,41 !k---„,.... 144, '4,---,,A) :-.4/ •-- . \,,, A-g..---in.:4':::.:-.:;42-,-.::-';,---- _-_,- ', . ,4,41,°-: *,:\:::::: !!!„..ti 7 ---:..- -.---•I'-'-'," -,-..-- --.------- ---I.-,_N-k-4.4.k-41,--.4;-iiIiii:.A,-,....---N,,,2',Z ,-,,. .1%-='-'-.-----:,'„'_'-'::::... '-t--,- 1.,'„,.-: ..4-. .i ' ' '•-„, ::::- 61''. 1*7J-------.,....,,1 :41;"--1-••;-'r.,-•,--N. :',* e-',;* 4 -i-it-,--"r" ,.,,,,,. -„-Y--'-'""•:',-; ,-/ , .'", '--,:::,3-4:444--;12:,;,':.Zil,,,T.,"- -.-7*.-,!..-',a ▪ l"-']•-'4i--- -# *,4•, %-ltql. i''''- I t,71-4.----,.----I-J --:-.,171k - ▪ -'i,4-- --]i-:--:'„ , . ''61--• '' - -----,---,,,,,,.-„,-..;„-,•-f5,2, ------ - -.:.- ..-6-1--,,,,- -,- -,--_,:•-•---,y/ -'::- 4--,--%----4....-::.•./ 1-7-.,-, ..,Y -- -•----, '-i•,.4'-7-', 7::::::,,;'Ir.:,,/ -,----,-----;=---,----;1.----„--244,--,-% _,- , i -4 . -',-t„ '. - --- ,,-/ --.,,,,bi: _ f--- ---"'"- , ' , ',a4.-. - y 111.■ -f--) „,,;,!.,5*,„,,,,,..,-e,„ ,„ ,1 1 „- _,,,, „, ..,.:--,---„,'/,#- ,- 1.■ -,--.,* '?4,%,!,''',-1.-1'• , - ,---- - -/ 1 4 - %' ' -- ' " 111/1-'--:'--1/ ' '''-'' 1 Z C=1 :!4t07-. 10-',_ -1 ' -,1 i-;i?1' -- c, ,-,,,1,,,„:,-e-,--44- -- A*-4- ,-1 ",- -=---/: . - - F.. ' ft*'------ ' — ' "„-- -- IJJ :!-?t.2--44-4-.-'--------' ' — -A -=77,,, 1,1,14 C■I I\ ' a a c as co V V)< s' " } 3 r CO f� S.-/y� CL *ce J Z j ILf k f A C y O W W N Fs' O O 4 C r,.3 - � N Q 1.1.1~C,) CC C/p I r . `. v 0 N O O I // a W = " = c3 W pC -S __ � � 1 °o i , i___C/ t� k . . w Q ,k „. ;w,a _ _,,,,, ,„,,,.„,,. , , _,,,_, _, ,, ,_, j//- � ., ,:. „ _ .,.: • /, %/ / a� � / /�//y -- ,�/ / �� / - i . ...' Ori: /jam ■ / w ¢ i. o 0 o H o cn in v A 0 w in o in in o C � O N O _C N 0 Y ' O N = Q 7 6C a> w '3 o w U Q o H 11 S d H U) �, H U) rt f�j j O W cc ” CO 1 zs i fti />'% 1 3 9 a a a) N O to L W C . o a s �+ �� w a a�i�' o R3,- • O c 8 Z.) _ L N 2 2 70 a) �' a a� C/� CO< 0 .• c2 cYC n LO. c o o _ Cl) 0 N L C v O O Lou'lA �O O� C7 U U E C a7 O E N E TO c0 O Q Y a,, m >, m E LL ro U c � c� ,°� cEa� = O m in > O C'3 o m a� a> o o� o c ca o co — ILI a W N 3 H_ N c0 a) 0 " j / = .:'--,".::1:-.1..1..!":'i:11,.,1:.."....::::.•.:.:101i :.•:,......:.:::, ":.:.:::::....:,...•.H.......:..-, '.. ••••H-".''',''''.::.:,''.....:....-':::::':::::',.7:....i-:::::•':'•:7.':'::-Ii: .•"•.),6411,'..:'.4;.'.,5e...:::.•..1.•••:,.-',..:.1.'";,::'....:-."— p ,, 4. -,•••,'„ ,•-•••••••'-•••,,•••••••-•:-, �Z .".":,,"-..:...-:.:....-,....:::,.....':H,:-......:.:".'"'.7.W41-: ".'''.'":liftr.::..::::...'...,.E.::,,r., :9-:,.,.,,,,k,..„1„:„.,„.:,_-- ,-,, ._,-„,-,-,_. t ° in O r, co w I o 0 N- o F- o CO In v A 0 o _ LO o Z N C W 2 N _ ~ ca < 2 Z 0 w w H LaL = H cn a cn ��rja = :N 4 {'- J ,y,J m ••• Q ,::•••,:••:-....,.--..,......."-,.i.": ...:,.....-„,:•••„,,•-•,......iiiegav-4-litik,-;,:•..,,...:-.............--,„:•_.„-..,,....:-J....,,-.--•••::-...-'-::•.-•:...-•-.-.:. • ..• •••••-•::::-.....„--Ziii.--,•-i::;,....-.•:...---::-...•• . -Afritiiiirrieh:::•-?,,,.::::0:,••.,,....:;;•:,:.:':i..:-•,: s I- • — %/ y J N` J - t -i O/ f' / Y .� r U, r. 14,i a I— O 45 L __I N+ cp W w ° r a a L }�' °) CC CC O O o o w ° • ° -C) '-a O N O O o w a) N O w c O �♦ ca O � c v o V r) (O M M U U >' c 1 (7 'C E O O N -O 0 0 N"O O a) 0 E m ro O Q Y 0_ a) >. o)E w F- ro U c cu 3 S E a) _ _ Q — "> Y O L 0 a) a) m 4) Cl) O Q) O C N o m I w a 3 w ) -0 F-— 0- 2 D_ ctl a) IQi 2 a H cn 0_ 12 u) Co CC 4' / / s' ' 1 ; , , f -et L j_ __,, - -1: ,*t 0,:*411to,;:larLt-t ,, *-. ' m i / — I ,- 1, --:-;% ';-1--',i --:-1- -1, .-*---,•:,- ..:.- �o� v) w_ I O 1- 0 LO A 0 °O• I� L[) LC) 0 N r E Lo CL CN V "O Z o = Q ro °' Z T w 2l) c' w~ °a, Cl) _ O H U- I H (7 0_ H V) N � , W J Q j ,_ Aii; i -; - Q j ,/, { ' = ,, is � 14, CC % / / 1_ e,,---,,-,v <, 1"( N Lo 4 Z + 2 0 C t 1.- D O 3 N W Q C/) 0 W C/) a x • ea CL N O CC CD W W CC Cr) Cr) %ice /�y - cn /% N ,-x' -,3N l AJU3dOdd i ry . ! I I f 3N11 AIH3dOdd C I y i Ln i i wad .. - �% .. -. -- T j CO a z z a O O d m z a z O 0 0 a a H I O cn O. CC 0 I— I— b N O CO °0 w °w w w Q d In jn co CC In�(r- I. +... . ,.. ,-....: c rti „,...,.., ... „..„ '''' , " . .4 „, , ,,,-, =‘",.---:= i ,.5-.-,- co.— (,) -,, 4, ; . _ ---, \ .5, -55 - ,..,....- E 0 5. . '-i- „,,, -- 1, / .. \ 3 ci) = (/) ..,- , ,.-- - CO< --:P-- "I :„•,„ -------,--- -- - - — --- -- - •----',.';--\ ' „===-„'-'''''''-'-'-'' .......„, At = 11 .,, .. . „.. . „„........, , Ci■ , , ...., o „ _, , _ — - ,---- C=4,1 .5.„.„, „,..,.. 5, „ , ., „,..., ......, ,,,,,, „ ,.„.,-,-- .-.-. ,,, -,...., ...-,--' ' -” . • , _ , , , „ , , ,.. , , , . WI ,,,.,..,,,..,;, '„,,,,,, „„,,. -,',...., „„,,,, .,,,,,,_„„....,,,,,......,... - ..„..„ 1.1.1 ,--.---1. : '--- .-J. „........,„ ......, -,„- .,. .,.. ,„......., , . . ___,..„. I . C/3 C/D . . ,......„,„:„.„..........„..... :5 . .. -_, ..,... ,.- . >55_, s...,, .. „..... , ....„.5 „........5 . ----- - '.:, ,,,, -\-2:vd - , :\ -r -----'----/ ''-=, - - --e '•-7 .' 5 - N ---' -i.-.:-,--,-4-, 1:,--.- ----\ - --- '-- =--- ---,'' -,----4 .;t 4-,5--' -_ --- N -,-Y _,,,,...., ..,,,,,,,,i; i ..:,...___, ,,,,:;•,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,„_,,.... .„... ="..., ,''''' ,-. -C-- ." --, ''''''''' '''''''''' -'''' .--== -----:ii,:ift -f7577 ,Ittrri,-,1,1--i-- -.'-'- ,;c :, - ,'•,I,-' -'-, --4,-'-'-- -.-'--/ ' - ' -1 - — •:i-,'"5'..:, 1,504 i'.7-,--:,:r-.',5t. 44, -',,I.-_--:-.-7-=-L--f-,--..- \ ----,--,:-'- :r- -,,,,,,--,=_,-,A ---; ,-_,;-:.:,,:,,„,,,,,,,,,.. , ...., .... , _ , 41ICC 1"'' ,m4.--:-`f-'",-,' ...,,.......,,.. , „.„ ,„,. ., .1 r i 0,,, ' - -''r''-4--t,,,}4- \ C■11 . .,, , Ai' -'il-:.--,--iF7!;-.... :::-=---i'.::;-1; .-., ,\,, - - -, :„,- 5 5 , , .„.„. , . :, : _ .._., _. , ..„....„ „..;¢ . „ „,, ,, , ,, I ,- -" '' -,,,,„s i - :: .,--- ,,.-„......-„ " " " ,.:- , 771 4:=0 ,i,.;7,„ : , =1:7-=',=--, ,,,,,,,,,, „,..,..„. , li „....„..„,.,„. .... „., , .-,-.-.. _.,, ,,,, ,,,,.._. ..,,„,„ , .., „--„,„1„.------,---r.--„..,-----— .--,---„f.-.- ,....„.„, ..„. -„,....T.,,,.....-,,-,i., . .„..., , ,.. , , „_—_,---- ,.,... 1.1.1 „ , ....— ......", -- - I -- LU CC .... . , . . ,..„..,....., -- -3- = - ,.... Ci) . , Z- N F- Ci) s W + Z c c�a - v W - o • tvui Q cn Q• . - , m Q v l - 1 i • -- 1 . 1 • N O O O N a ._ ±: %� i/% /% �%' , cn Q f i� i W � �fir/ i%/ / ///% i�/ ,cif/i/ ��' •• 3 0 0, ': , ,, ,- V y x ys s G T ii / i!/ 0 0. / y• , / ice , -! / y U) W_ CC O H O N i O in in O N in i co O _ w H U o c co C7 a`�i m m a H LL 2 � W 0 U) --741lRIIIIIIIrr / /i �1/��i//iii%i�j % /. 1 // -/j/ ,® �/®/ /� // i� /ice / 'ce// i // � / // / �v- / /� / // /� /j jam / ��/ i � y�/ iW i /� wj/// ij j/ % /i% W �% �/ //%ice/ / �� in N K Q o Cl) c0)'W � v o (,2 . Cn cnQ Z w -W ° N = a) a) °' yar Q o F c N O r in O _U-O O u cB C L d F Cl) O O mCCI 2 _ Y _ a� n a> 0 Q O C O u 2 0. H Cw/) � I- CD N -4214:-;--i.,f- -; LL 0 in Cn. 0 v o Cl) in CC O v F- C/) O N O tn in O N in r C� U) O Y a) Z = m a O 4)0 a) I—Cn CC a Z U a O U) /I Z Cl- a) I- -,,, W = %!. J V Q 0 to M a Q W °' ' G) = W o ' � 1.1.1 CC N o c w fn Q 2 " c `� w N N b to b U_ C) f O C _ N i CCI � g d co Y a o — c7 Q i) v cC Q w 0 o w o 32 U- 2 0- H (1) a. f— CO j� // . LC CV -4; M • -- - .. : t 3 "! % i 1P. 6 - �W i 1I; . Z =Y z d es 1 0 " ma , s 4 � N , b cn w E 0 v H V) O N O In O N in V CD C/) O �� H ro U c I in Q Z M CC C7 °' w w : N �, W /�J j i CO .a-,� . Q y R ,‘„, %�!�j Z % iii i . / 7"7 . CC 10 i- --1-- •CID) a (45 V3.n Z E 5 5 (1) 0 .c u) .....- w< i- C-1 LI-I Co -•`2 0 CI la I-I-I • C=0 - Cl■ • C=O 2 Cl) CC CL, Lll = = 1.1.1 >1111 41:C 1". C=0 CO Cin 411‹ ,,,------;-----:->-;:„---,--_ ,,,-„,---;.----. „---,... , .>'---,.,.:-i-,.2:---- ,---- --"'".,,,,,,,--..-->-----'----;,-,----1;,--;-----r------_----,--f------;---'''''-.---;,-- ,-------:<--r-_.,,/------------- 1 I ,----..,------re.: _-_-e-,.----,--v--%,---'- --;',-;,-- ---',-,!-_-----_,----,--,.,... I i -s., ,,,5-:;,--- ---5------->,------- ,%-=',-",-----:,,-I ii)1 1 ,-..--- -.-. • 2,4-'04' ;-- ' '' 3NI1 A.1113d01.1d tot-4, I I - ,-- ---:„:---,,- ..--„,-- 7:171:', ,,--.` ,, - I , ,,,-„ En * ::4' 3N11 .1. A83d0Eld 1 1 I - - - ---'''1,. ..fr.-- •---> 1 I i i 1 1 i i 1 i I 1 < m z z 0 0 I= _J I= a_ < a_ 0 1.- Tr 0 cc w LLI Cl) w a CC 0 Lu 52 0 0- 0 I— in I— in in o c\I .-- tg , . . ••„, , ,,•„:, ..• ..: + 2 , „. .„ • .„,•-•-_, • •:„:„. ,,,•,, „..,„5:-/ „ .•-•,-- - 4., \ 3.,-. 1. , --: -- ''', C 03 CO•'• ,,, :1, .-V-,:::I /-':-'''",'- .'\ / g 0') . ..... ... , ..„. ...:. .. , .. = 0 .: -,-.,.'- - ----- ..,---- . ---.... m n C C U)CC k::11-''' 7!!!'" -.1_,- :•.----,,://,-.- -1.-\ ,•/-.. ,,,,,,f ,-".:-/ ./ , *I fa ir:,/-.7i'l . ',77/:-.--,.. -------;-----_,,,,,;,,,,,--, '-'---,::'-'--,----, ',•:.:1---1.:P:::::::-':::\ ,- ' k„ ,=:::7 _,----- ...,_, I i fiNttgi,,,, ;;;; , : . - ',,,,, ,,,t ;--- ,.,-,-,-..-„:::- •'-%,-..., ,-,,,f,_„,,,-,,,,,:,...,„;',,,,, CCI it, . '' '7.'7-..-: 4,41-:===::1 -:::',";-;:-',.... = 1=0 At/.2i. --4,:;;;-!-',--::---::://7. "1.--,. -:-. .,,,,ii.:i LiZ -;-;'-:::':4-',,, ',-,;1•7.2-•-•,;--- ':,ri,--•'----L--!:':::-,;---,-' r r-,--1, /-1.- \ z-- ' CI= --.--,-,,, ,-,-i7t--T.'.----a-;;----7 • - , , ..„..._., , = ......„— , ,„.„.., ---#'-'-=/& =---,-,-,•=, -r•-g-' - -- rr- ,1 -iiii----.,:4 - - : -r-A=",.??--- .. /z-..;'''''-:-•.--,. / =--- :1-'77:1,- W ---,!k., :or-i---1. -.... ., --,-r-v-,:,,-,E;;::: .--"1„,,,.:%,-;-,:rt 1 '----r•- .--ZZ/4'!.",:---grfl:' ---•-.r.-.-----Erf- •'i-'r---r-r::-, ---'W.l = ---%f„7,1,t-f,'-1-!;::i-k:,-1. .•:'.. --- ., .4,, • ,-- - AI -,....,_.„,,,.p , ,...-.... ;,,.„, , / L.LI -, -.---. .,„,:„...„ .---,-__ „-„,-„,-:---1,- m -„/ „/ - , - ,•-/,--„, ,,, ,...„:„., .., .,:,.,;: i-,-„441.--.= ..-',,, ...4 i .2,,-::„-y-;-z. i— .... .........„ i— :„..„ „.„.„„:„, . _ ,, .- -, ' '''''Uff4U'lf 1\ ''''-• ' --1'• --' „/„.•,1:4i4:4/2-111 „I '/_-_,„„ •-•-•::--2-„/„, A,. 4ICC ,,... ..„.„ ...„ .„....„ ,...„ „,_„„„. :„„,, ,, : .„, „..„, •- „„, ..„, . „ , „. , „„; \ i' -, i.,,,„„ 7-- Na,.v5r ,p,:-.---- -_,-,:::: :-.-,-:,:-\ ' •-,. ,2,-,- , "--,, ,= if ' -- ' 44,,i - 1=',I:•-..-1,-,I---,v4.;,-.%,- :-.,-----.;=-,1-,.--,.--..-. ,.- .-_..--;\ ,,,, - :,--,-_-, : , - - ,_--i- R4-1-.4.--.---, --5---3:-':---A - - ' - t- ,j- -....4-1 --'- , ;IIIIII rilfraff:4':-:-L'•--- .1-'-V-i!'-c4:?,-;Z'i::::::::'..-'-',':1-1 -:11--;:::':'::,:--\ l'i'-_.'',,,r,"=-7:, --.---"--; .-''. ,-'. .1 .-.: ,41,---);;;,:.-;-*: ., . ,f ,: .,.:;--,;:,:-.;::::::: '.\,, .,._ kl-g-'-'''':"-P-77-.....'\-:'.4t- 1--,-,-::-------1-:--::--'-'-'::::::::\-Li---=, '".,1 ,-,'-'•.., .-'------,. , -./ / 1 •,-,,;-_--.:!•„11 r„.il.ii :---/..,!-„,•,,t7.,, --->„1,--•;=!v,-5. 4..„, . „„ A-„;-•/ ------„.• --1, -„:--) ' fAi- ;Ia tV _. 2,--,-_ ',.ifitt--4,,Pf!'',1.., , ..,:-' '1,. :':'," r -?",-ii.'' ".1-lii#::"..N :-',, '-- ,:::-.-tr• ..,,-1- _.:,..,,,"'',,.,..,.., R0-•• „-1111 /r ,4-,=643'----,-,-,-„///- .„--;;--- ,,-4 ... ',---.:' '-'-----.--, !--j-,-:/../..-_/,--.f/.--/-/-„,t;,-,-/ _ ---{„-ti, ,„// ir ,•-.7:/..-..-#./„.„ ---,--„,,,,, s ,,, . ,,-- , :, 111:111fiNr -,,.24=-,."-: ,:,__.--}-,,,,) ----,-, ,-..1---;-;.,---:,--,-, ' 1,ittli, , ''-0,4-1,1-.--;',Ak5'i' :-.-,, ;;;;;:-714:-- .7,-, Y WirC '7- iPi!.111ii!;q;:P.-.•.-!-,,:::;,;-#:::::,-ZY---,-':/) 2-":"V--;.., .;:,:' mo, rn.-a1-17.--1,f1AL'71( 4:-:,,,,--iz-2,,tii---',4;-:3-k--4 ,:;:-!:---,,,-,,,;:iN- :-----,--------------;------------');:::':// ,.., x_,*, --.:::-.--7.7.:,,,-•,,,,?-- . , 77;--4- C:0 -,r,if-';K%t*I-v-_!-?-4 ; 11;:fh.-:-/i,i,--ith id ----- --'7,-, --,•=5:::7-,tikgf,4,---- '--x-:-T,m6---i-',--,.','.,.-T-2-:'-'-_-'5=:=:-.1 ,- , ': g ; ,'..:'.. ;;:,.---..:1,:itl:-.7---_ Cll''''' rk--,,,,,, ,t..-4-=0_,-.--,--7,--,---N 'i 3,---:''i ' ,r,',7,,''-------,; -1.' 7/4:=1"teLY''':"---'. '-f4=:' l ," - U'--,, L,„z ■ -.1.%':,"'"-MIWAg--SZ--N HUM,:r- --T -,-,--- 0 -zA--,,-,../„...-4!-,.---•:-/ ft--,--iz..-4-i-to--,..tv-q ---;,- ,- -, .., -,-=-;„ ',-;/-/it:-=,;1 %it"(;:,:i.,..7-77%:\''''...---::::f-,:-.I!"f:.:4-;/"---:-. ,i-'-...) a a '-e5v4,: -,,4:$4,i _ „_. LLJ •;M-t=' • ,,,-,z-7-",/,-,/zy. . _ = „:„..,.,,,„,„, . ,,„ .„,„ ..2. ' (Y: ---?''''-';',7%-7'..) /4;:f4:-',.'.;:_.::'V-1 LLJ /_,-4-1_,.., A-r-AT--2----- --,-,:„,--///i-,-• . . .:C --fm---_--•sitsitv. / ; '• ' ''-' ,----/- „ , 1,il .:4=x4::{, ! / '', ': p ..-",•_ :..T.f 4, ' : 1 i Imi 4 ",-1-N:', : ' '',, , ,...-, F71\1 1 5 I-- Q LLI >"'" cc C.) LU w c� n a & >> 33 + ftg .7‘.:`:/i,:::,-=, ,"". ..„ ..4'7-;,----:', 1,-,„,„,:::\.-- - V n wa c0 c to o• � U U . -Q 3 4 B ?`/ a Ocu N N a) o C• U _ 72 . ,._ ,- . .—Q N U • . o-� c o -. - E o C 0 0 a N Q Z E Vr N N O 6 o_ •U a)f 4 a m o'a,4O • N ro E x o o o a 2 45 - v ai ai c° a a) a m L R N U.L E w ro r • ° a) o . 'E II 4 u)r O o ° E L C O N. 7 E � ON cci C c�d U cO 4 o C .O C a E as-o ro c O n w � ; 2 O a a)) � j'O a o u) ao �C 8 c E O O Y O Q o cti o a OY.N 0 fC 4) O 2.i E O N " n ( U D EO a O p m L O C co E 2 d 'i c0 O N N U N _p z 3 E m iuj .0 E -22'51,3 N Q) E N a C c a) OL ro .a.0 — O 4) O °_o °'L '\""a - V N _c:.-.= uC N aa O C �- te E U- f♦ �7 /7/.ij i /if; ,/,: '',,":1 A,N), '."R',)/1Z-1.:•'.\;:idi 0::::-,,,,,, ,,..:!....-''''''. ' ' ' \-), ' 1 ‘ -'''-- -';4• A%rft" .1 ,,,' :„,. '3.,, .-..,, * : .‘ . -:f-'7.7 " - •,'' v- ,•!.-x.:fr-,, n4w, -,, ,., '\t ',./--;-1:-.' / 7---'7-,:"*.'-'" '---,-.---.\ 1, -7c9.1 1",','\'';,'41k,,41-,„fAr-VOW; %'', -.2 '.. 4,,,si;,'.-"' ,-,••-:; '. - / , • .:-.,„,,,,„,,,.. .,13,..4.---„ ',-,, • ..„. ,.\\,/,--, .,, ,,,..„:-,,-, ', Itt, \ .uQ.4` \14:71-- � / t / i" `may zr a //�ji j, ,, //" - . ---,/ -'.-,,\ . ''7,,',, ' N ,_.. ,,,,,,,,,. . , I, ,,.:,,.., -,_,_:___,,,,,„,...\ ,_7,-, : [': \ :' ,..„...,:='._„..ji ',.':" .1,),I i.,:v.ii.:1‘;.,--.1'. ..., ',.-,„, 1-„ -,,,fili-----,/j-_-",,?"-* ,- „,,,,,,..,,_ , ,' V\t.,:-.."1, .. .... :`:v1.7,:(: :„-,,j-A,, \i' :-=s',''.'.-,-- %-f!i- „,',--1 ylx't t %j l✓' \ am -,-.--::-,:'-: --j.:1'77-''''r 1:/:" ‘-''' ,A{S.jr)\ /77k\.. J j ,,,f,,,:,,,s::,"..r,11‘,,z,,._:;:\iii.f.,,,,,,,A.,..„,`x�Y 1 �'f Ls‘., ',',/', ' I ', ../ %'''t-7-7,\!,;-?-",--:-:::'1 -:,- !131`#f )f fie. -i.. 'F` Ni.„, 'X'''7- i3 cl 1\ 4 t r jr ..,„ F� F)�� \��• �� a... � It �, ,_ { „.,,.„,,,.,,, 23 co 0 N � N cc �Q W m M W 0 W CD Z O /// / ,Jf \Z. s A sill 4114,,il \ t y // j �y y, t ,c,-,:: �f{ i i �� `�' j r i _ \"s 1\ ///� t- 3s '� \ ' ( ' -t 1 # } ' /� , Y l \\\ ;ii:,..,!.:tiiiiiw,..,c,::, „it,j rf /z'<, 'r s iii /!i /% 1,1,i ` .�..,1 ?,. am.. % ; s/ Iii jj/i ij .., ��:� Vii! / y/'7'77:.--:Z=.;;:,',4z.L 'i' \-1-..A'4- �/ i / Tf. is„,i„,,,,,...„ �� i 1 } \ is \ i / i// p \ t '�,>� l iii i % � //% �\ SYf "4�r!' ,'.;*1//,' i � �»rir 3l � ice' 3,;7( , \ ,:,,,,,,,,,,,./_,,,,.7,:„\i) �� t rr � � � �f. .--- ,_;;,./, .4,,, 4-.y.--71, l'-'-.,--.:,!:;-: -,. ., - l / \\ 1 '''''':::': ' ''''1=i"5 -:::-:::y_-, , - - 1\ �.�, j ,1: ��t i }3, , f S J 1 ,. s •' f3l Iii ;_,,,,:„�" ..t �,i;-�, ..pis�!' �-' \ -. a /{. h y1 ifs.rf [J c �/ .! 1 ". I j 11,111\* I f \ ? \ 1 t fl Vi/ wk.µ �\`',. , ! .a ,J pit##(pf'�� ; � JF �.�-. f }7 7} }; =S a* N a a -. c� L''6 N p 2 c0 O T -a O7 a) U Q)O a)— a) c� '- rno > N .— O A O N O c0 C) _' co O 22)48->,8-2.8m� ca wct-oE= cc � V t .-° aa) o E ate) 65 c°oU co v c3 CO co co aai cca•°-)•ro E"5 °aoY coo N co , C r ) - � � coo0�.c cn< sc :,`,3 �a •: o 6 oaci ° aorn O p c° i 8 y o ; 8E c m a? co fn U c f/)L=.E a—°)Y c E O) yO L ) ~t c aro) v) O N Z r N s � U a =aYtOO V o a�«o rn U 277 c 3 L ca Z 0 -2 1.E.-3 >)N m m cn apro o a 2N t, —Q- .LE aoa° i o. rn sg Q%am 0 3 ,a') a O'c U y N rn -8 mc�G' U . Eva.2 NE U o N O Osv- VO 2-cN O c g cYNirn. 73 0 `" � E Ocoo. ian< ..• �� , LLI O 4. F` 4‘. ‘, - \ \ / , ,,,, , \ , , ..., lik k ' ' \ ':-' Ns-.4s,' \ 0.. Iv _ \\'‘. 1\ % \ 2 ,,,,s, , , , \,,,, , ,, \ a / 0_ \al t '' ' ,,,, \ \ ik‘i,,,,, i, , .. ‘ -,,,,,,,, , ---_,,,---,----, \ 4\-\\\:. \ -. - - , -„-_, \ .„ ..., — , , -,i-_--, , \\ . i \., ,, \,, i , , ,,,--a \ . ., A4 Ni k‘..., - .,„,,,,,44‘ ,3, ,. \ �1\\\\ ,,%; _„ \-, s, , , .... _ ..,f\ \ f 4%- ‘ .... -' ''\, _k\ -f \\ \\\4, \'' \ f 4 ‘ - .)p,_,-,-, ' t \ '/1111 i,.\.i\,i‘i.1 I..p—li iii i N'1', �1111 % /%8 o k x"\N V A\\4.4 -\%i\N.-,_, ,'-.4\/\4 /-... \/\',, \ \'4 1111. ‘S 4 / _-t\$ �� Y V k i0 v- 11 v\*\%, �� .ti 4* \ ! $1t _ iir ' - V A ;=..--' - % fA f/N„Sis,\,,s.\\,,,,,,;\ ,4",1 li\ 111101*Askl.\ . \\... ' V ,*8 - ‘ - \ :‘-=--... —"\Y a ,=---,- '\\ \ N, --- " \\---- ' '''‘ 1111116k:‘, - a' , , \ ,Y-,1 '\ \ A% ,,,s, „. ',it_ ,, , : N 4 SN s.' \;--*--/-,;---,-------I y' / 9 r/A„.ti k )„, r /j O > O a) U Zg. N 2 >, 0 cti } 'N O a)U o pni ci" a) r .0 c onp o-a) a c p an �' a c 3 0 7,a c O p c p t 8 a a E 2.N c (I) p p ) E U) 0_ 2 U ms . E o,E �( 2 i p _. _ o c .0 N O o a c r U a) Q a > °o .. c 2 Q U 0. c CC p.V , r a) $ p 0 a Q a U. E " a) __ N c) > O 7) IT"LL o E o p °° �o o o 71 c . ) . a) c 17)Q a) a)U v) m u) c v) o a -x • uI 22 r O o� c oc p o� o N @Ng N M M LL a d LL !n LL N LC N Q vpi • • • 0 CC III 1111.11 l i i { j i I .._____ EMI � 1 ..,,,_ , ,.._ . 7: _, Mill , ' ' all 11 i I i i it • i I 1 i r • ,, .,,,•,. --jr % I "Y11))) Y I i (r) i o c co al— E 8 u) = u) =ct C:0 M I=1 I— 13— w (=0 C=3 u-I cip c=0 0_ ,--,, r,i„:, ,..,;.,,. cp cC d. „ \ Q... __, ,1 .,\-.iff .. -',-,, \k,,, ,,,,. ',A, .N*,' I\-->i'7-\ ii ' ,14111/;7 ::E'17:'''''''):'''''\''''''4\:\ ''47 i'''''t) ' ''''':(i . ., \--, Ai-iiiii-A ' /- -,.',-,2 : --/-*17iii: --P *f i:- -I..„ lieRvi \i'i ii,,,A=AiVi i ik ,4),a' l: i'''ii.\ ,,,I tk-51 't,l,,,:., Atli \ '-,, ri,"-:*iii 1 , v 0a,--k.fi-,-,-:ii7-- ' -,..r::\ ii -'„--',-21 711 AfRiii ''i,,, i ,--%-* k •*-''A,-,- .-. • A '" ) Lai 114*- -'„-, .'-' / -f• -i--, ' --,„'i \---,:,x%,,t7 ,iss ':,,, ;lg,:\'-,. „.... 0=,„,, ,.. ' ,., 'iiii. , „ai I i• -P&-. 'i 4 - ,.: .,_.lit' ii,\--- ' ,i. \0. i„...7,-7), ,,fir i.4 ,*,, -ii,„;kiii,. 14.iliforgii .,... z, ,,ii,, - i.„.y .,.-.-„::.\\ . --- 7---------\ 2 :;El'E /:1, -A44i , ,. ' ': „7,--, '-'4#-.--, .-'---zx :: „ , 1kitiifil :,-4,-. i#, '-.0-z 4,-_ .--::::-4zi."-: , V. 1,-;': 77,-:---:::::::':'''j„'' ifigitt07 4 , A- ;;%-, :, *- -,---f MIL':'-'-'''r,-,4ifiltitH„Iiit1-4gtiMf: /.'-'-\ ''-'1,-ti ,_ ,-,-.4,' *,, \ 4stv' -':;---':' - '--,_-40t "**i*% - -- A''-'"-:,:, -4--- .:1' '''' 11111"; --:' )/' '''VIA % ,-A4 *--,, ' j7,,,,-f :AX:',' % , :--4-_ IC:1,- -': \ -Sft,-- Ilt-,. '-'r.\\;''').?,--.,A\ '''-..„1 ...„.i-n-,4vwb,, .1,----ki-- ,,:,,-7,, ,, '' 10,. 4-#t:,,,, \ MH':,3:::-: ::-.::', '''' :'4r.'ill-f-:"Zik177:t, . -gi-IffriPifit*,-4k;ii .;.., ----;:,1.*,,:iiiii4 „ -iiiir,-;NIi:' „?::::: .1 1k*,4 *Ek%1:1,t,, t „ - ..47, .1 :.4,,':',74,, ,:\ --'012K\--,,,,,,, ,,,i.ty ,_ \-tAftiil-Aokiko:-, „,, -,:=,-,,:x,,,,_ ---,- „ -A kat ' n,,,,\ ,,:::,:,-..,,- YMr,,,,,..i., , tV...,'\' 4':454A-1;t4' f-A, \,fli,-',/ .--I- '' --'''- \ iinli :r.'-'-'• 4- . . -\ 'V' \A, Ufkk.V /Aix --, , ./.. 4-4% h_if,1-1,,, . tf-,-,--:.-,,;: ,g.. , -''-':-_,I=41-t''',:1--:\ -:-..., A-crop-- /4Am\ ‘,,--77li-.-:.,). ,,,-,-nt,y44- ,. .'"%:, ft:'.-4--' '---Y 4ttX4x.'/- "'''------; =II\Iikt iiiiktAVt.:_,,. ,;- ,_.,2,.\„\\ .-A-Sill ,A11-1\''-/--.- bi,-fr!-',.''' fllit--. -1,,,7- ,4,7-i- iit,-,„‘ ,t-i,"-, ,_. .,1'---.41,14- ',P.e4,-,-,, ,V11. - --,-,- , \ .: 114 Illini tv-,-,-Nwq ,:-"\,:X --/i) 4,fikA ;./e.,7 \ ---- 4,:-„,-1***„,,,Q--:,**-:"-Vt1 utistitik.,, Togii),„„,,, , -4.1. 4,, ,k,:4- 7,14:,7. x....;„.1 f.t-tillf.vx,7, ri7:-VIII ,,,,,,slimy „,:- „9-A%w-,,,:.:',,,,,jA,,!,74„:„ Itt4t4- *4400.-410.-A, :,,,sitiftitA, ..,,,,,,,,,ni \-4,,,I,i7. ,77-,,L±,r,4, ,,,,,,,, -1/44,4:/---:.-4:„:A„\\ itekturialt, Ittni ibpu-k 49zzix--,': :,--ali---froizt,4-z7„,,,,4„;. ‘ ‘,.v.g*-01j.ifiuli --iiifttgoasgitigiiii.tfkul ityliti4iffiiiiiii„I/- . ,',,hilat-Ifif- -i i*/7,-ii-,' fit,,,,ii_ \ Wii,"iiif*--- iii 11111-1111018 i i th144/1 '',,-17x,.,,.-,,,,`.',,,.-:--,i,.-7-' -:4 :,: ‘ '.--'VA4t ik-A 04 / Otlitmili!,, i, i/ h---372--47/..-,- ,‘ to--'4.ici,ll lftft""N,, ".4,'17 ----;.„ , ('-'"" ,..-,,,/,(0,-z-44-141t.LiA it %Af,lif *-71N,M,' '.', IN'-----,w--, - ' '-' -"7 1 11 r 'I lfkltl,„S. aggi%144-k tillitt, k f31:,: ii'Y /'1-1-il;'/IA M--2\ ,.\ tavigiffilm-t:, :,2*;-,,, /,-;!=.-7-,,,--,-:a,;,\\':--,: ii.ilbl 7 4.---*I'A,d=1 :_::'s,:is\ iiiityi.kig44i, A lialailifi:, i-ii,-cif,,4-- _,-.:-X4', ;,,:i /'-'iiitt.,4itt77:-4-;iijit-ii,;1;„-', iiottlitittikil' '4-4-1:' ''' ' Y4',7\.ft-ii '-',.;:1,.:-.:,:', ,*(iii:;''T .;--- -gt7-4- --*-Z•0,* gielAggria** --,-,';',.::::•)-VI '-r:1'.'-'-'7„ 3011141t451* 4', ' 4-Yiff'44-//, -,- - ,-A,,,,,;. YtE- ..,;;mittalat:-L-lk - 4t,/ -,,Z'N,1-,.\li .,,,....“. S. illrier,';':''1"1 i,-i.,,",i1 '' ' ,r. 1'-::::::'''''' ['-' - ' --"---=-1 7 igitalMktf,,, , ,, ii ", , ,43.14-U4 ' ,--;-,-,77,7L: ,„ --Iws,,,,,,,,,, ',,,,,,-;,,„,:,::::,4: ----- tafolifli r" .,V-c--,4,;".;4f,' r,v , Ai '-:- ":"c"--\:-'":,-:'::-::::::-:''-:.-.A§7::'-'ili:1:1--. 4 --.? ,:-:d le;11414, I 1/-;.,, '''--,-,::::i:--- ..-;P:!,--T:',...,=./'„'-,, irs1-1 i -,----44-!,:' 4 , .„,„,,, .,.,., „,, ..„ ____,,„7:.. ,„, :,,,,,,, ,,,, „„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, -„,„ • ,i:.„:„ -_.„-„,„.., , , „,\,- , -,,, - , ---;ft-ftS-W,, I-, . , ., ,,, -,,,kt.X, \\ ' Villf",,.:„... 7„,Lklf,=4'f zilk,.y-4:, ----i .' , , '1*Y '',, \ ./ '--- ::. 4:=,,, 'S 4_,-/ . . '-,.T, i-- ;, -ri .., ;77i.,,:-, „. ;*.n T, l'i, "d 1)4?-4<-. .- rN, ----, ':- -:--I y"\'::, ---: --j ,A----'4,, '-'7;,''''\ \ / - - G ;if, ' ,.,_-.-i,-„: ----,,, - 77-:',"-',,. \4:----:i.\-r,--;-,/ , \.',- --f;:::A -.4.-. 'q / ----..;._y. ' A ).,4J,, 4,\,,, ---,szoikk ., / ''',,::::\ \:,---- r2 , \ ,, &,, '------- 11- i - \ \ " 7 /ii ,, /./:7 ---,, -- A7'-,--- --/ti:-. '-- ' ,--'7,x -'y xA/ ' ,, '-,i f iltiglitt::. - 1111414' N f0 n CCI L d y U +_� Z ns flU O N •g a d 0 V C fC O-o "0 0- C 2 mC.t.i 8' ms i E Q,E `° O a O > O p C L O C v)Q Q C = -0 Z d' C 2•V "i N O p O .. N _� 2 N C E 2 O Q cj N ❑ O O p cc E >. 8E-1 L 8 4 N O 0.0 0 O) � O) h a) a) L U O E O c '6 �: E aO m O L() p p Ti c Q y 2O (i) cao� ro> ro ap °' X°I W _ 2 2 a s 0 7,5 U r N U O U r 86.23 O liQa pli Qa I U_ p m N .n 0... n Uin a) Q co N co (7 ■ ■ ■ 0 CC Clow 11111111 . ail ._ lin 1111111 1111 . • 4T r. y 'P 1 .,,, ::‘,.::,.;,,,,,,,',.',:.''7.'''. 7 r Opt& - • is $ i,�' k ;,,s' J W J. i i �/ L11 / i s o N y O O >% 10 c7i (D (1) 1 = U) U • CO ill. 1. = 0 0) l■ 0 0" 0 LU Cm, (D rk I OS 0 C "I Ca NI< 0 .... ,,... 0 ____ LI-I 1.1-1 (A LLI 0,11 Jo icul . :1= 0 0:1 p.,..,„ . „_,, _. ....,. .... „us _ . — w 0 0 E 4000, = _.,iiiiww. 12C. 1...... um.j cc u) 0 cc ci," I-LI _ . 4441 1... ----,--- -:.---,---,71;4-74--__-,-,-,---- _, .,,,_,--_,,,,:--.„--..--•-•,-.- •::MA,1$1.-fitt:,:::--;_-_,- __:-,,_,',, -:,,,-i.4,i7-_--.- - '.---y:it- -'-'------!$:,,,-.7---...i f*---„--gt.i;ttt.,:-::::--:::---:'-='-'''-k1;-• ---,, ....-N_-;-,,, ' '---, --,-----'-'-'," ,-;<--a'----i-,;',-;-4.-. :-'--;--1-''' --,t:' :-'--- .1- „'' -,--41-- --a-,4-2,:ti,„-;•-===.---,,,,„„,...,-..,..._..-„,„ --,,, --- , --z-,,,,,,,-. ---- - . °"7:---.- N -'::;:,,...t.1:g:S-,..'-;:!. -.-- -..7- - "4-'77'' *WitiN1 ,1 =7A,tr.,7:°;;I:,,,:,,,t,,,,,_17:7°.,77,:\‘‘,--,, .'"' _,,.,,, , _-.';',-°---;-•,„\-:-.7;-:‘;.;,',.: - ';`-- :,;,$: -=8*.V4, -N--'' - '''''--- -*--'''..-.--:-'-'-:-- Alt,---,:,.--:-' ..--- '"--- i*'---A\<:41,, I---_-,-_,--' - -'-i-.,,z-t-*----.--;-,--,-- _ , '-,- -•-•,-`'''.- --1-'-''-- -- --;p,7•"„-±'''''' '"--';;;;--- ----'----'; 0'-'7:- „ ,% STL-7:;:::::-.•-z..-:" 44-,,,. ---%,g4=f-",--1,-;!-'Z'''`----- -„--,,,-- , ,,,, ,:-I;VC---.--: -,.-,T-7-",4it-•,4:-_- ._-: --.'...- , c .;-i,RifoiyA , ,,---1-- - ,.: - --- iikkvi --,--- ,::,:,•:--'!';:t -;,---*,--ii,o': --,---_,- -;:-. _ .-,-, , :;,--‘, ,•-,--.::::--.z-,--ii,---;-.-_:‘,,.„---.-,.-':.':-.!, -.-,:--- ---- _---,,-..;:r--8'. ''.. .,,,,--, e1"., --- , ' r t'-i':f:'` e', 17--"- -- .5 . :::'-N,:',N;---F-' ' .:,--' r: -4:t-,--- - ---.*:---,;_g: ;--#1-;: - f --,----',-7:7--:*- --- .* --- '- _' ' ,i . tot..7,k,-„,,,,,:.----,..„L .:•-i,:,--,- --, ---,--. - - rr4a,--=-.;,,,;,-, _.--' ,•- •-I--;- ---.-- ,-*,- ,--7,F,•,. r..--.:4-,,,,----- _ • •--i------ -=-- -;..•::. ,,,- --- - -- -, -- -- :-,=:: &:::- !- .----, ;:,!!: --4-'- _ ::--44,6:-.7,...2., ( - 55....7., k,Isz- till6 ____,,,,,,,,iliF.F-,-; t:::'•-- ,, ,,,:::_,:.----,f, *- _ :.-,_.-_,-,-;:i.---,,_,', 11: .. *-M ' y- ..,,istVoNt,' ,,,,_,„ ' , ii, gi u) _ __ .1 A- ,_----:,=--•,:=4:?$, - ---.,--;;"= "ii.,-!-.----*--, - ,::::,,::,,,,,ti,,,,„,_ -------7-,5,::-.„-k,-r7. - , CO •I7 1 1=11 il,„,_ _ ,, .::''''-.-1---1-,'-----4•i--"'"'x'"le--- 7::i,<7:;,E:;41_,„,,,_,,,,,,,_:-.: , ::,_-_.:.-7,,,..,,, :,,' '_ , •__ ,,.___, _ . ...._-:, . :.,,„i,,,:„,,,,,,:„,:,..,-,::,,- . - ,,-----.--:,...- E ow 1 m u) ict 8 (I) -, 744,2. ,- -- -- ,,, 1 N a (l X> co n co rn C) v 0n co n CO rn 0 N + 09 C as '^= (I)V!Q C c O O O a a a a L Q Q z T L-,• 0 0 o a , O O ( O Z o N U O O U v C O m C0 O CD ` OO m.c _c m w CO 1-1- a -F-. o 8t O E O a a O O Z Z O c E c o cp:=.0 0ZaaC/)a N d LL V y °L.O y d O co C O > O >- X a .O N N O.x O O•X O 3 2 O w p H w 0-d w d K cLL = a n w .1 m Q I— N a s N O O m a C C- a) (B C N + U) Q ct, ,_(5) 3 c E "a o ro o m o cn a) o =Z ai o o +c+! 0't C O C U L..-L ._ O O) N a) •N C o ^ U N o 0 0 0 Y F- C o o 0 .O L U N o o) N 0 7,-0 .0 IU) U U:O L C O L a) a)L co c0 ? () c0 3 Q ° c 3 V/ Q a) N O 0 N o To - a OH s2 E)-c a) 0�.(T,-0 7 n oriL - U O R. m. -12 a N.2 3 te 8-O c O D E so- '8 o Q N C aO cno D -2 ,3 -0 2 N 0 2 C w- V 'O x -aU N rnf 25x0 Q1-a a) 2 V) (B 2. C '5 -9 V-a c C Z L c t- ° N N C.0 o C a) T c0-° c0 o F- a 0 2 o >.cts co U= L °4-4 cO a a i N >.2 a o'C 5 L O C C O L ( N E w c c c0-- N co N-a co .c u) an a).0 N o L a) a) N•3 a) E c (n - t ai 3 ° m a) c o U-00 E > 0 a ate) o r-'�0 ate) 3 _cn cn o Y ai o c 8 6 w x c c ui.5 o ai c 5 a) 2 o L ao 0 5 E c 2 U ° - a)•- c U o N m m a) a) L E a) ° ca z..-,In cn --. o—15 N-gin c V E) a))L~N c0 o c o E � `� � � (nv � (CO ° acioo3 ° a) ccn °0 ° 03a) ocCO ° Eoa o c N ca-= co a°i 0.D E 5 o X- ~ a�c Y c ai o=_D o- 5 cn a)C O cca 0 c m � -0 >.0. v);- °' o a) C °o o•� ro ci) v.3 a- N (0.5 U,L.. O C y L 0 - 5c o o a) to C o)(n a) C (60 T. N L N in N D r ca-LO m N Q, o)00 aa))' .. c0-0 2 5 N 0 NO c U 7 F-- >'F- U 5 o E 0.o 0 L a C o °U) N N = a)L V N 0 E C_o U '� p)a) c c0 .c O a)oc .S 3 .- a3im al c oa) ° a).S °L°. La) N Z ° > cc o (n o N o° U m e 30 3 0 a) U) 0 N 0 N >'u� a) N c 0 a) - =p-0 T c0 v)_ �. a) 0"0 L u°) m Q N w N N m .�. E o c0 d -O X `) cc0 N a) 7 4) CD. 7 O - °cr) C = C > N co ro n L C 3 O C c 5 L 4- o o N U) N a) ca O o 0.ro U to�+° N 0 U - ca .a 0 U c- a 7 a)O N 2) o)=o) Z oin�'° v,�_a aci a °s a`ni o �� °� E ° 3 � 'a° °' o Q L ° t C C o L O 0C o c0'C c0 ' in c0 > o o "a N w - N N o a O o a O cn ac ° ca E N N y? a) 0 3 ° 2 U • ° o a) ° y N L-2 U N a E i) (0 0 as V o(� E nj >'7.� L F- 3 a) 1-- N 7 a) C N Y L o O ipQ cUC^� TNJ c0 L 3j.E C O p cCOQ.in QY i� ° o i'c0O) O c0 h c °'m 3 p ° G °N N > ° U L E U• E ° S U>.2 ca) • 5 L a).._ c a 7 N c C. 0 C ct Z N O N di L .c O N Q L 4 '� 0) U+N N j o L N U N C N `) N VU) a) O O (0 7 z 2 c v) a)�a F- .0 E « ° Q F- a).T c>�ro (n 3 li � Q.�F- D = Q F- - cn t--Z ca U�.o N 0 O O I l . , . e , x r ti , C,, r T:' �4xyy1 C/3 . „ "...„.... fit„ f y4 t a cIR egd iF 111ry 4k J . q; 4■C , . ,..„,,,- , = ,....r,�F 6 4■C , . ,„. ,..: :,1,''''..,'141 # n' a 4.J qRq ,5 f Y 3 ";a 1 i 1 S 7 u a CC o •• r� CD CD 3 + `� c — N ., a L.J. < < a) ; a C/)W _ -� y� 0� � a m � ' m Q FQ— C N 'k p O g W '^ O CC l'am,,-, , r F- 72 Z V-` 0 w Q a� a rX v c E J .e" > s2 E '" o Z c 3��N=�A\/>N!i7G o co w Ois u-; C c0 CC _ °' . CD �- O v p W Ci, ��. X,3 J W t_ H- z a a Z U V _ Q 1 c a .» ,a t �»<« .� iurt,.d 1 d nom, � � 'k , W � W .5..., Z a � w Q 30y2 831 N�33C R ' .t N 4J 0 , ,, 2 2 + ^ J u_ _ P. �:I . ••• • U fA N (I) U) U) U) •(n 7 W_ W_ W_ W_ 1,,c= cc W T ;r ro 4171 N ('1 "c&:,,' E a) Z — �� 3C TIlS C;31 -�a.,ia"C a�pA Yi q'fl' �,�"+ vi { " � ° a 2. - a) t:1 ooj a; — p — — CX 1 2 (0 m 4,0..., • ' O Ln N R-ter ,, . ,,,, ,,m7 � �� + * : rt �fi � a� � ° 4 #�. a�.ud>.ma.rw�A,uua+.+.��m" C �V; �p A c 33d2231.NV330 t i , G x 4,4 sst ie"'a C @4ia$,IttiT W 0, sF , Ci) : , IN 111111 $ za yv 44. �L— i ..-.-_. L - : r LU s z RI---- n n in 34 t o + N . a, � E._ m Y 3 • Hy O 0 0,C O•c i�— m co c./3 w o a o ro CI c y 8 a t N D =��Ca �Q s C U cn fl ° c ,m�� , CC 8c=.-. 2 N o O o L L z_0 c I- N(��F �2 FL".° a oa = 20 > ,vrn N v N v= S L N O 8 L(n O.) 7 dj L r,� a roth yr ,7; r.A.4':',;i". ..V?"74.4.t,:-' al 'm gill° III illil IIillll i o •`—'ifigiliiiii L1 il�iil� ".1 a,1:�' 11111 _--� ,, 111111 111111 L a s. � ;� �, �.� 1 �.��011111 � � ,v 11111111111_. 111111.11 1 111 11111 ; w �- sim mumu 111< _ ui 11,1,1,F rill k.E.,,,\....e■111111 � _ _ 11111 III�Ifo .\N ►. Illi11 11 i1ii1i 1ii1111111�R.111111 111111 iiiG�1.1.J 1111111 � - iinmr_ 1111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111 1111111 s ,� �] 11111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 11111111111111iii, 111111111111 1�1 x��111111- 1111118; i o 111111 1111 , 1 ----.: o 111111 11111 1111E 11111E 1lrrrr 1rrr1E,111 ,_ 11111 1 111111�11�111-11 U 1m1m,1l11.illlllhllllll ` z 1 P ♦j� •rte 111111 l iiii shill 111 .1111111 111111 111 ... ♦I♦ ,�!� 111111 111111111111.11 III 1 LV"t k►'Nlfs ♦♦j�-�#�� 1rrr11r1rrrl 111 III 1 i� �i 4/4 .—_ 111 I III 01 I ' 41 /I, Ili 47 ♦, ♦� `�■ I II 1 , MI6, slut., I.,.... „. ■, 'zim....r. P .....,,,, i 1•11111ENFTIMEM 111M MN c-s-1 b, OEM MEN ,411 . IP 111111111111111111111111111, al D 1111111111111111111/ IfP w.,- 1.41- 111111 i i 111111►�� 400 1111 '1 1r��-' ♦ �� soot -.,ss fr. Tri-:,,,—ffr ,, ' _-. ... ..,,r .r,,, .. ..., it,. . ,, L9 lie,; .., Ott Illent:, MIT 1111111r-,, MD.,IIIMIP Mt:1111111W-il 40.' 0 � C � � 111111111111111:, �j.� ma =I Norm a.....,,,, 00, ..,,.,„1/11/00 a Co o' + N I..I..1 ° d) a,,,, _ t CD CD o C V) 2Y t N CZ cn a T 2 N U i cU1 v 1E N C ._ CD . ca.'- ,. Z C 2 , =p C _ 7 aaaa� ,— O= U CO — Q <n H CC _ . , . - O ‘;',0'• 0. . .. ....r atrairt rarara fairranyaixeiram itrittrrrarrtabxteatata rartrwair-- ■ @ ef CO 0'831 M/33O•• 3 , , ``"' \ ... N , 'j iL`;\w ■ 796 am 7d3 Roo 1 Z7 . lost ■ ',• • !.4....... ... ....m_.. i i inif Q. ■ ti , \-,•\,c,'.., ‘,S- ' ' . .:1• - .-- '1 i.\\\1 H a II I1 il ii it 1 w' 1 1 -L\-k,\ : ---- - h 1 !' ;11 1: 11 11: 11 v\` : w *� `... PT:. ii I aZ,.til CI g .......... i:1i: I\ I c gy h S kl"y})\ h\ �-.. _ ... ........... LCtt._t3t...fGt! atcaoc�. ...-.... ._ _ "aorc « NI4211�H it r, ,,,,\,r c.,",,.: ,,,,,---------1 f-----10 , 'N.- ,N: _-_,, \ ,,, a 3nd9 `\ M :�1 I� ,,,,. ` fk` �iy� \. -,,,w,-: X177::\ 11� • : y 1 C 1 \.N kaSV,,,, ' ' q q\ i I,--- , il" i 'r alb:l>l`!'� `,...,...`??.;AS?b. .A4AC .. "`, .J et ►� 0 i J d N 1 — ,. ,ki . ,-- ---,-, ----- -,, -- -‘.7 ' ' 'A7 9 ,\„- is : , 1 ,,,,_:;0.„ii\ -\,--,-,,, i------------- L,..k1,,k\,, ,k\sk\-: . v, \ t---4\ ' '7). .. : ...N, .: r 1 %,.L , , , .- , --1, - ,,,, ._.•Nig 1 g . 91 -i \\1 glAkril te ;: \6 ,\ �..,_!• I 1 \ : i i • •.....=N'--.._.. ..._. .._........ax.............�sn_.u _.......• _! ', ...i�c..: IT IV 3 11 3AV 31,t1WY ' ''' r-'1 r-7'' g ii ! \lk-i- , 1--mi \-\ Rte.... • ■ a+t............'--i>fu. sesc..... - ,3/ry SN3513f0 r,. ' ▪rararaam3rrarraamarraarrara ■urrra�l! 1Ct[ ar"p{OZ \ .. OtOI MiC 00$ Sc -- ✓ ..-. z M I \t. 3 ,. i 7 o.a.alil...... ...., .. .+ N a W � L7 ++ Q g = N u� a z Q ji i � - s, � /�-W / �/ i% - j• s= ice/�� " �/iii/ / , = , / -O %% i / /i , - , --,--,--,---,e, ---'"------------ --- -,,miall Q y0 ?y � i// �/% r"-- -- iii % s y s / /ice k i t O ` „ w m-_3= C. vm a Cl)i �� k = i= x y � W N N N C jam k -.7.-r-_,,.. T ; ca to cn E-0 U C ro O > O... �' its o5E-c q b, ro t O ,_ o H E c0 c0 ° • I. LLJ + Q •g W va W C) Q' D Q / // ice i/ /iii � T y r>y%i N av /// O a + 2 W - _ V c r n CC na,_. Lu 1. ,,,. limi. , ....,„„,„.„,„.„-_,,,-7,,...::0,,,,:,.. -':;:::t, ,t,* ---' IIIK V tt CI millillike* allC4';'iiiiial' M N ' r ° 1 II I ` ' cc �iffi r ri■rr I— eirwmpite ' ' i ' it /�/ , jiy a �/g / iii//✓ % sij : � pasumiimmw/%/%/ .tea .ice%„ j�, a r f - 5y -. Or , g f.- µ.. wt^ .._.+.. N ,, o I N a W - + � Q ,,,::,,=_,„:,.: . .....= ___,,,, ,, ,, ,.___, -° r 3 GA W C/))Q I- a ;� ...-... Z Q -' LLJ G� �� : -- O CO Myam :-.. W ' 111110111 NrtNRt*A ' 3 O ... " 1 / %- 4 r I l , I : E - t - . 1 y --,,,..A.m...........i s _—� ii-ice v 0 N O O a ,, .:, 1',..,,',,,,1,,',,,.,,,,.,, a I Y: ri C/, • • t LU MIIII CD ... •. , WI '-,S,''''''4',,::,''''''•!'''.t.i.'''''''''11 ''?'tn m i.A �?i lin. q v 7 'rN a�t��4yY�. man i x t•,p CC '''.1'1:::,:.:1:;."-!,,*"i(!.'•:','is li ';‘;':;31::„"'''';'31.:123.t,";'3,','::i',!-3,),:te:',.,„,','..,':4'1- ''''.',.:1;2'3f2;-=,,;:::!:...tk,fil C/3 '''',':''''''''',i3:',.',1°'''''..‘f'.e.t':'4 ;:i .,'.::::-..:„;;:::4'24';',.1 ; '''.',-;;:'..,:',.,,"'f.:‘,,,i d Yc 'C ,y1 ;' i y,'¢ k i + 1 S: ,ta Ica *..,.. $t Y a` 3. , a a �� + 2 _ii = ti C-1 �, E�o mu) CC Q N —.17):2> �Q 22 rD V N in (d C CO V L L.J.J 0 o 0 `"� °��' a a) U O O d O U .r N y _ O N C O N N O U 3 U N a ~ a c . r„'. ors zm:x.,e ac” .'s''swv ib� a� \,r�bw�,t p�yR�� ; EL, J :�V d�fi,41� gi b�'ki'�5 �t \�ti[K x �b t� I 'ia 1a� ij �" 5u'^5cy} �nN ��y SNP��o w w it •F:v R • • OA r l' rAIIIIA" - i 4 it*. s y.,.-erg...- €f z i gi ii -' s - i, a:: 0 .,. - O a LC) fi d x x O -- w = N Q N � � i cn<t � CD (0 N OM '11111 _ O N � 0 0 CO O CC / 0 p p i Z -� _ O a0 W ii O v cn F- 2 i i Z Z // X / i W i i / i i ii r 1 Ix I t�a._...f . r 7 L..:11-1 1 i . L � ;L L . ,, i L ; I.v o 11 N I-1� O -- m �V z z c rzs co cr) CC,„,„< w W Z _E N ULL UL cn< Cl) u) U) U) .. o S o 0 Z8 cD co_ O ^ \ Oin in co in r=\ a ' Im■m VI Q 0 00 a[ a0[ l f `\ �\ ) J CL %f CL D 0 p J 2 , O H C7 /; W = O w '; C7 U) H I- I / ,it � fr' f O ( °a o o ` ' r J to _ . N n /-,4 :,:::::t#0-4$,e,, ' t V♦ F o- in a /1 7 N-0 4) Cl) Cl) s �°'< / /I W d 13—L f o co J Es°. "a� s ro '/. �Z Z 4 /•1 o2 or ga y / c LL '3-°r 5 Y ° i '{ j/ / j; U C / /•=J O •L ° •U w �i / s ° c,t f: 6 rl•1 m U U m coo c°a a ro 3 i= .; E c o-- in v) O � �oa) ° caai 0 2 w E> �I O t..� .1 h 1�I' s i `1' y .......................................... 711 I.:f 1 r�1 r t - i Li v 11 y - :i ,-;= j 1 t: i - i AINIMISTIMMEIMMIIIMMINIM. 1 O''' L. . y i� 7. �� N d �V z z c,B o CC W w z z z z z z C cn cn Cl) cn cn Cl) cn CD U) ocC S o 0o ao co co ao ao 0 ,Lo O L I) N N N N N N CO i �� -�� N CC X I I I 0 I / `� I W W 0 O SE r 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 i I a. OJ W OJ OJ I I J ¢ // • LL = LL LL 2 H Z O H Z I- —i I i 9 cc 0 CC W L~L 1-- W C7 '7, \.\ / ; C'3 (n H It It Cl) U) W F- I / 1 O 2 c6 O U / i. � �z ai f ti U p / i c0 N a N C p C / / 1 CO �� / . •2 2. X o c • O ro >,' _ it3 � 1, i / 1 r-.' O a N r Y k NNE " £'4 ^. a ., /1 X p ffl U .$ 4•r T(O r r as ilk Cl- as N ; " �,. a> N TL, ,, /, 1 m cc ,13 L O Z C C c0 ,_ Q QcO� =F i :! rt t. .‘11.4i'4"-- ;.,:-'''-._ .. '. q MEIgn ........ ......................... ..................... r g NEM '. /....,070t- t y \ r y ,1,.x.1 �I i i0 ti ` ° l '! ' x CI' j S it '?rya .1 /%% N ■ 7: (I)sal +nICO o M •L.L to Q..,_,Ne O j< " ii/ � /�/ y . ', � H c'' 0 i CD I Z • i •. i J j W i i i 1 a\ ili 11 1 ,1 •„ i yi t i 111111111111111 ' i t r r f , \iiii 1 a t it t +s , ,. 4 .ltt F Y .f x if IJ� A+ It N�: . p S{ h t ii it a y • }I CO tai'u c VJ CC ._ 2 N Q Q � L' W 2 N \Z _. z � cg_ O W_ N C O _ N Q Ey a O ' i p p� ic cc _ a d y M o O y Qr 1 W ' c0 Mi � 1 ' : � ,' 1, ; O ! i i I i'I 'I iiiiii.m 1 I ,„ ., ..„............,„...„ ........... , . , . ..s....... . . ,..,. .. .. § i \, .,, ,,. .. ,.. ,, ,. _ __•, .,. :,...,....,.:,••... ..• •• •••,.. :.-., , . • ---• C U H F �d Y� N \�V.; r . r a l -_- -y y pt 3 I 1 f7 .I r E, ' I€II V g Ik o N ' I ,,Y �m x 4 0 Fa Q 0 d p).� rn a N C O c CO c)U) N s CO E as�_ > c U a) ,_ CD o To s o,Q U mod.. CC co ca, 30. -ooa, _ c U m Y n U :? a w ca o.O. S,o v, Y .MO oco a ro > ° ca9 a, m � c U °'o m no D E o cc°n °rnoE ° ?' °'� °' >,rno 3 Y N Q)'N U N °N•C O O c) a Q) D N E ' >= o c r 0.C.7) U co U .0 t N p vi oa y o t o o c n axi N N 0 cco ° co co 0 C= a) Q ai m ai co Cr) a �L o ° > >.U CO C i °cU a o N c ac9i c= a)o _cw > cca= `oar> � oa� � �ZOU a)_o o N a— L--i-a al C a) a) .c c U' E >, n N c.0 WC L N•,., ca N co to. o o co j N co N C >,EO E co, co CC U as o c > o a) _C (0°. -�-- C.)i 1- 2 v ° ° n 0 W 3 °U _ Oc a) CY ° U v,-C c oa) _ Lao ()ca ° ° C c0 w °1 c° ' C c o o E F a'-o~ H co o c « _c L ° U N a) cll. c n o O C.°.` N _•., u) a) m• = mn0.E0 7E'° c° ) Em17 arc E (•C co-LL't 2 > t tz O n a) O O v, N in U, a) Inc op a, a, � a) — . °)° joc -c�Hla O°CO CI E•c a; ��H a)• a'a, rn E 000 o•C a) C d C v, > ° a) C c 7 -0 C N V n•L� U U N a)-c N • co 0 �'CI) i_a Y co < 7 y Q o . T X -CC o.o C N a) U a) U C o ,'j 0 0 L U O (0 U 0) I— as.0 a,O 2 U O co O a, C < UL- CV CO O H c'i 6 W A O 0 ATTACHMENT "D" LIST OF NOTIFIED VENDORS VIA PUBLICPURCHASE 9 ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE 300 Decisions,LLC Andrews Engineering,Inc. 505Design Andreyev Engineering Above Green LLC Anston-Greenlees,Inc. Abraxas Energy Consulting Apollo Construction&Engineering Services,Inc. Absolute Consulting Apollo Environmental,Inc. ACAI Associates,Inc. Applied Environmental Health&Safety,Inc. Accuvant,Inc Applied Management Engineering,Inc. Acumen Building Enterprise,Inc. Applied Pavement Technology,Inc. Acuren Inspection Inc. ARCADIS U.S.,Inc. A.D.A.Engineering,Inc. A/R/C Associates,Incorporated Adams Archangel Engineering&Construction Adams Environmental,Inc. Archetype Design Group,Inc. AD&V Archetype Design Group,Inc. Advanced Systems Engineering,Inc. Architect Larry LaDelfa Adventure Rope Gear Architects Design Group,Inc. AECOM Architecture,Inc. AECOM GMT Architecture Studio,Inc. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. ARCHITEXAS-Architecture,Planning and Historic Preservation,Inc. Aelux,LLC AR Creative Development AgreeYa Solutions Ardaman&Associates,Inc. Agriscape,Inc Ardanuy Engineering Corporation AID,inc. AREHNA Engineering,Inc. Al Engineers,Inc. Arquitectonica AIM Engineering&Surveying,Inc. Arrington Watkins Architects A&K Energy Conservation Arup Alacri,Inc. ASD Alamo Architects ASR Engineering,Inc. Albert Kahn Associates,Inc. ATC Associates,Inc. AldrichPears Associates Ltd. ATC Group Services,Inc. Aliff Bowman Sprayberry&Associates,Inc.dba ABS&Associates,Inc. Atkins,NA Allen Engineering,Inc. ATKINS North America Alliance Design Group,PA Atkinson-Noland&Associates,Inc. Alliant Technologies Atlanta Light Bulbs,Inc. Allied Engineering&Testing,Inc. Atlantic Icon,Corp Allied Roofing Consultants Atlas Design&Engineering,Inc. All Pro Clean Ups Inc ATP Engineering South,PL Allstate Construction,Inc. Atriax All States Lighting Auerbach+Associates,Inc. ALPHA Facilities Solutions,LLC Automation Control Service,LLC Alpha Terra Engineering Avalon Engineering,Inc. AMEC AVANT-GARDE BUILDERS,Inc. AMEC Environment&Infrastructure,Inc. AVCON,INC. American AVO Training Institute,Inc. American Awards&Promotions Ayres Associates American Consulting Engineers of Florida,LLC Ayres Associates Inc American Consulting Professionals Badali Design American Engineering Testing Baker Barrios Architects American Structural Engineering,Inc Baker Environmental Consulting,Inc. A&M Graphics Banks Engineering Andrew Merriell&Associates Banov Architects Bara Infoware Inc Bussen-Mayer Engineering Group,Inc. Barbelo Group CAD Engineering Design,Inc Bargmann Hendrie+Archetype,Inc. Cadre Design Group Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture CAG Construction Inc Barraco and Associates,Inc. Cal Poly Pomona Barrier Island Builder CalRecovery,Inc. Barry Sims Inc Caltran Engineering Group,Inc. Bath Engineering Corp. Calvin,Giordano&Associates,Inc. BCC Engineering,Inc. Campbell Surveying and Mapping BDA Architecture Canerday,Belfsky+Arroyo Architects Inc. BEA Architects,Inc C.A.P.Engineering,Inc. Becht Engineering BT,Inc. Cardelli Design&illustration Bellomo-Herbert and Company,Inc. Cardno Bennett Trenchless Engineers Caribbean Project Management,PC Berenblum Busch Architects Caribeno Architectural Group,Inc Bergmann Associates Carl Walker,Inc. Bermello Ajamil&Partners,Inc. Carollo Engineers,Inc. BH Architects Caron Architecture BHP ENGINEERING&CONSTRUCTION LP Casne Engineering,Inc. ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE Biositu,LLC C.B.Goldsmith and Associates,Inc. Biscayne Engineering Company,Inc. CB&I Environmental&Infrastructure Black Dog Publishing,LLC CB&I Environmental&Infrastructure,Inc.(Coastal,Ports&Marine) Black&Veatch Corporation CDC News Blair,Inc. CDG Engineers Architects Planners,Inc. Blot Engineering Inc CDI Architects Group LLC Blue Bell Landscaping,Inc CDM SMITH Booth,Ern,Straughan&Hiott,Inc. CDR Maguire Inc. Borrelli+Partners,Inc. CDX Wireless,Inc. BOWMAN CONSULTING Celtic Engineering Brailsford&Dunlavey,Inc. Central Florida Equipment Rentals,Inc Brand Craft Media Central Testing Laboratory,Inc. Brent Johnson Design CEO Structural Engineers,Inc. Bridgestone Associates,Ltd. Cerento,Inc Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Cesar Garcia-Pons Briones Consulting&Engineering CES Consultants,Inc. Brio Services LLC CH2M HILL Britt Construction Inc. CHA Consulting,Inc. Brockington and Associates Charlotte Engineering&Surveying,INc. Brown and Caldwell Chen&Associates Consulting Engineers Brownfields Development,LLC Chen Moore and Associates BRPH Architects-Engineers Chevalier LLC BSE Structural Engineers LLC. C H Perez&Associates BSSW Architects,Inc. CIMA Engineering Corp. Builders Exchange Civil Services,Inc. Building Management Systems,Inc. CivilSury Design Group,Inc. Building Mangement Systems CivilSury Design Group,Inc. Burgess Engineering,Inc. Civil Works,Inc. Burne Engineering Services,Inc. Clarion Associates of Colorado LLC Burns&McDonnell Clark Construction Group,LLC Burns&McDonnell Engineering clark I huesemann LC Burns&McDonnell Engineering Company,Inc. Clean Skies,LLC Clear Creek Solutions,Inc. DesBrisay&Smith Architects PLLC CNA CORPORATION DeShazo Group,Inc. Coastal Design Consultants,Inc. Design-Build Construction Inc. Coastal Engineering Consultants,Inc. Design Harmonics Architecture,Inc Coastal Quality Services,INC DESMAN,Inc. Coastal Systems International,Inc. Dewberry and Davis LLC Coast to Coast Engineering Services,Inc. DG Design-Airport Planning Collins Engineers,Inc. DHM Design Compass Engineering&Surveying,Inc Dieters Sod Service,Inc Concepts To Operations,Inc Dinter Engineering Company Conestoga Rovers&Associates DMK Associates,Inc. Conestoga Rovers&Associates DN'A Design&Architecture Conley Group,Inc. Doanld Reach's home&lawn care Construction Solutions Domain Experts Corporation Conventional Wisdom Corp. Donald MacDonald Architects Convergence Design LLC DOWL HKM Cooper,Robertson&Partners Downes Associates,Inc. Core States Group dPOP!LLC counsilman hunsaker Dredging&Marine Consultants,LLC COUNTY WASTE,INC. DRMP,Inc. Court Atkins Architects,Inc., Duncan Associates CPH Corp Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing,Inc. CPH,Inc. Dyett&Bhatia CPI-Pageantry World EAC Consulting,Inc. CPM Technologies,Inc EarthBalance Corporation CRA Architects Ecology and Environment,Inc. CRA Architecture,Inc. Econ South,LLC Craig A.Smith&Associates,Inc. Ecosmith Architecture&Consulting Craven Thompson Edlund,Dritenbas,Binkley Architects&Associates,P.A. CriticalPath Environmental Services Inc. EDSA Critigen LLC Edward Dugger+Associates,PA Cross-Spectrum Acoustics LLC Edward Lewis Architects Crown Energy Services,Inc. EE&G Construction&Electrical,LLC CRW Systems,Inc. EE&G Environmental Services,LLC CSA Central,Inc. EE&T,Inc. C&S Engineers,Inc. EG Power Engineering C.T.HSU+Associates EGSC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS,INC. ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE Cummins Cederberg,Inc. Ekistics Design Studio,Inc. Currie Sowards Aguila Architects,Inc. ELECTROBOARD Solutions Cutler Associates,Inc. Electronique Controle Mesure Incorporated DAL-TECH Engineering Inc. Elert&Associates Danella Construction corporation of Florida Elert&Associates Data Center Enhancements Inc. Elliott&Company Turf and Landscaping Services,Inc. David Boland,Inc. EMA,Inc. David Douglas Associates,Inc. EMC Divers,Inc. David Michael Davenport AIA PA E M C Engineers,Inc.,a wholly owned subsidiary of Eaton Corporation David M.Jones,Jr.and Associates,Inc. EMK Consultants of Florida,Inc. Davidson Engineering,Inc. Emmett Sapp Builders Inc DavisLogic,Inc. EMO Energy Solutions,LLC Deatrick Engineering Associates,Inc. EMR,Inc. DeLisi Fitzgerald,Inc. EMSL Analytical,Inc. Enercon Services,Inc. Gale Associates,Inc. Energy&Resource Solutions,Inc. Gannett Fleming,Inc. Engberg Anderson,Inc. Gannett Fleming Transit&Rail Systems Engineering Matrix,Inc. Gardner+Gerrish EnSite,Inc. Garver,LLC ENTRIX,Inc. Gary Disher and Associates LLC Envirobidnet an Entram Corp Gary Player Design Envirographics,LLC Garza Architects,Inc. ENVIRON International Corporation GatorSktch Corp. Environmental Compliance Associates,LLC GDKN Corporation Environmental Consulting&Technology,Inc. Gecko Group Inc. Environmental Management and Design,Inc. Genesis VII,Inc. Environmental Science Services,Inc. Gensler Environmental Systems Research Institute,Inc.(ESRI) George F.Young,Inc. Epic Group,Ilc Geosci,Inc. EQM Geosyntec Consultants EQ-The Environmental Quality Company Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants,Inc. Erdman Anthony Gershman,Brickner&Bratton,Inc. Erdman Anthony Geyer Coburn Hutchins LLC Erdman,Anthony,Associates,Inc. GFA International,Inc. ESC Lab Sciences GGI,LLC Eventstar Structures Giffels-Webster Engineers,Inc. EVERGLADES ENVIRONMENTAL CARE Glavovic Studio,Inc Evolv Solutions GLE Associates E W Wells Group GLE Associates,Inc. Exterior Consulting Innovations Global Sanchez,Inc Facility Engineering Associates,PC Gobbell Hays Partners,Inc. Faith Group LLC Gogulski&Associates,Inc Falcona Management&Technology,LLC Going Green Land Care,LLC Fawley Bryant Architects Golder Associates Inc Federal Engineering,Inc. Gora/McGahey Architects FEI Engineers Gould Evans Associates,LC FireOne GPI Southeast,Inc Fisher and Arnold,Inc. GRAEF Florida Premier Contractors Graef-USA,Inc. Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc. GrassRoots Environmental,Inc. Forestry Conservations Communications Association Graybar Electric Co Inc Forge Engineering Inc Gray&Pape Forrec Greeley and Hansen LLC FORREC Ltd. Greenberg Traurig Fosdick&Hilmer,Inc. Green Construction Technologies Inc Fourtune 4,Inc. Greenfield Diversified LLC Fowler Construction and Development,Inc. Green Lighitng Company Franklin Associates,LLC GreenPlay LLC Freese and Nichols Greensite Engineering,Inc. FSC,Inc. Griffey Engineering,Inc. FTE Group 4 Architecture FTE Group 4 Architecture Research+Planning,Inc. Fugro Consultants Inc GRUPO INPOWER,LLC Fusco,Shaffer&Pappas,Inc. GSI Environmental Inc. Fuss&ONeill GSI Pacific,Inc. Gullwing Homes Ilc. HRP Associates,Inc. Gurri Matute PA HSA Golden Gurr Professional Services,Inc. Hughes Associates Inc. Gurr Professional Services,Inc. HUITT-ZOLLARS ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE G&W Engineering Corporation H.Vidal&Associates H3 Studio,Inc. Hydro Solutions Consulting,LLC HAKS Engineers,Architects and Land Surveyors,PC Hypertect,Inc. HALFACRE CONSTRUCTION IBI Group Hall Engineering Group IBI GROUP(FLORIDA)INC Hamer Environmental IJR Services Hanbury Preservation Consulting IMS Handex Consulting&Remediation-Southeast,LLC IMS Hanson Professional Services Inc. Indigo Service Corporation Hans Wilson&Assosciates,Inc. Infinity Landscape Management Hardy-Heck-Moore,Inc. Innovation Technology Partners,Inc. Harrington&Cortelyou/BMcD,Inc. InSite Group,Inc. Harry Pepper&Associates Integrated Solutions Consulting Harvard Jolly,Inc. INTERA Incorporated Hatch Mott MacDonald INTERA Incorporated Hazeltine Nurseries,Inc Inter-Fluve,Inc. Hazen and Sawyer Inwood Consulting Engineers,Inc. Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. INX LLC,a Presidio Company HBM Architects ISES Corporation HDesign Isotope,LLC HDR Engineering,Inc. i-TEN Associates,Inc. Heery International J&A Associates Engineers and Managers,Inc. HelioSage LLC Jacobs Henderson Engineers Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. HHLC,Inc. Jacobs/Wyper Architects Hicks&Company JC Ehrlich Highland Associates JCR Consulting Highland Engineering,Inc. Jerel McCants Architecture Hilferty&Associates,Inc JESCO Hill International,Inc. J-M Matkin&Associates,Ltd. Hilts Consulting Group,Inc. John h.dean architect&associates,P.A.,A.I.A. Hinrichs,Proudfoot&Skov John J.Christie&Associates HKS Architects John Portman&Associates,Inc. HKS,Inc, Johnson Engineering,Inc. HKS,Inc. Johnson,Mirmiran&Thompson HKS J Urban Design Studio Johnson,Smith Architects,P.A. Hoefer Wysocki Architecture JONATHAN PARKS ARCHITECT,PL HOK Jones Edmunds and Associates,Inc. Hoke Design,Inc. Jones Edmunds&Associates,Inc. Holeman Suman Architects,Inc. Jorge A Gutierrez Architect LLC Hole Montes,Inc. JSK International Inc Holmes Architects JSL Demolition Holmes Hepner&Associates Architects,Inc. Kauffman Consulting,LLC Howard Industries,Inc. KbH Consulting Inc. Howard-Revis Design Services KB Lawn&Landscaping,Inc. Hoyle,Tanner&Associates KCI Technologies,Inc. Hoyle,Tanner&Associates,Inc. KDW Salas O'Brien Keith and Associates LMN Architects Keith and Schnars Local Office Landscape&Urban Design,LLC Keres Consulting,Inc. Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam,Inc.(LAN) Keystone Associates,LLC. Long&Associates Architects/Engineers,Inc. KHR Consulting,LLC Lord Cultural Resources Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Louis Berger King Engineering,Inc. Louis Berger Group Kirby Stephens Design,Inc. Maddox Construction Company Kisinger Campo&Associates,Corp. Magellan Advisors,LLC Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Magnum General Contracting Co.Inc. KJK International LLC Mainstreet Architects Inc. KJR Associates Inc Maintenance Design Group,LLC KMI International,Inc Malcolm Pirnie the Water Division of ARCADIS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN,INC. Management Applications,Inc. KPFF Consulting Engineers Mantel Teter KPI Engineering,Inc. Mark Lerch Landscape Architecture KPMG LLP Marlin Engineering Kraemer Design+Production Marlin Engineering Inc. Kraus-Manning,Inc. Marlin Engineering,Inc. Krent/paffett/carney inc. Masbuild Inc KSK Architects Planners Historians,Inc. Mason&Hanger KVC Constructors,Inc. Masteller&Moler,Inc. ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE La Capra Associates,Inc. Matern Professional Engineering,Inc. Lagoon Conservation Matrix Design Group,Inc. Lamb Engineering,Inc. Maverick-LLC Land Architects,Inc. McCall Design Group Land&Water Engineering Science McCampbell Irrigation Design&Consulting Langan Engineering and Environmental Services,Inc. McCormick Taylor,inc. L-Architecture LLC McGraw-Hill Companies Lassiter Transportation Group Mcgraw-Hill Construction Latta Technical Services,Inc. McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge L.Cobb Construction McGraw-Hill Construction Dodge Ldn Consulting,Inc. McGraw-Hill Constuction Lea+Elliott,Inc. M.C.Harry&Associates,Inc. LED are Us McKenzie Design,lc. LED Lighting4Less McKim&Creed,Inc. Leggette,Brashears&Graham,Inc. McLaren Technical Services LEIDOS ENGINEERING LLC McMahon Associates,Inc. Lemartec Engineering and Construction Corporation McMahon Associates,Inc. Lempka Edson Architects LLC Mead&Hunt Leo A Daly !melk Lewellyn Technology Inc Mendez Engineering Liberty Engineering,Inc. MENG Analysis LightRiver Technologies,Inc. Merrigan Energy Group Lisa A.Harbert,PE,PLLC MESA LittleFootrprint Lighting Meskel&Associates Engineering,PLLC Littlejohn Engineering Associates Metamorphosis Littlejohn Engineering Associates,Inc. Metric Engineering,Inc. Liu-Johnston Design Metrospace Design Group Inc. LIVS Associates METZCOMM Services LJ Nenson Meyer,Scherer&Rockcastle Michael Baker Jr.,Inc. OMA Midwest Valley Consulting OMA MIG,Inc. OneNeck IT Services Corporation Milian,Swain&Associates,Inc. Ortega Construction Company Milian,Swain&Associates,Inc. Otaner Inc. Miller Legg OTHON,INC. Miller Legg Overland Partners I Architects Miller-Remick Corporation P3 Management Minder&Associates Engineering Corportation Pacific Voice&Data,LLC Miovision Technologies Inc. PANDO Group Mittauer&Associates,Inc. Parker/Mudgett/Smith Architects,Inc. M&M Engineering Associates,Inc. Parrish and Partners,LLC M&M Engineering Associates,Inc. Parrish and Partners,LLC MOCA Systems Parsons Montgomery Consulting Group,Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff MoonCom Parsons Brinckerhoff,Inc. Morgan&Associates Consulting Engineers,Inc. Passarella&Associates,Inc. Morgan&Eklund,Inc Pavement Services,Inc. MRT Lawn and Garden Center,Inc. Pedigo Staffing Services Murray&Associates,Inc. Pegasus Engineering MWH Americas,Inc. Penn Morris MWH Americas,Inc. Pennoni Associates Inc. National Center for State Courts Perkens WS Corporation Nation Lawn Service Perkins Eastman Natural Systems Analysts,Inc. Perma-Fix Environmental Services,Inc. NBBJ peter j.smith&company,inc Neel-Schaffer,Inc. PGAL Neel-Schaffer,Inc. PGAL Net Connection,LLC Philips Hadco Network Engineering Services,Inc Phronesis Neumann/Smith Architecture Pigeon-Roberts&Assoc. Nexant,Inc. Pigeon-Roberts&Associates,LLC Nobles Consulting Group,Inc. Pitman-Hartenstein&Associates,Inc. NO Equal Design Company Place Dynamics LLC No Magic,Incorporated Plisko Architecture PA NORR,LLC P.L.U.S.LLC North American Materials and Manufacturing PlusUrbia Norwest Corporation Polston Engineering,Inc. NTD Architects Pottinger's Nursery and Landscaping NV5 Predator LLC ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE NV5,Inc. Premier Corrosion Protection Services,Inc. NYSTEC Preservation Services and Technology Group,LLC Oasis Design Group ProEnergy Services LLC OBI Consulting Engineers,Inc Professional Service Industries O'Brien Engineering,Inc. Professional Service Industries,Inc. OCI Associates,Inc, Professional Service Industries,Inc. O'Donnell Landscapes,Inc. Professional Systems Engineering,LLC Office of Cheryl Barton Progressive Water Resources,LLC OHC Environmental Engineering,Inc. Project Graphics,Inc. O'Leary Richards Design Prosser Olsen Associates,Inc. Providence Associates LLC PRR,Inc. RNGA Architecture,Inc. Prudent Environmental Services,Inc. RNL PSI Robayna and Associates,Inc. P&T Lawn&Tractor Service Inc. Robert P.Resch,III-Architect Pure Engineering Services Inc Robinson,Stafford&Rude,Inc Pure Technologies Rocky Mountain West Telecom,Inc. Pyramid Engineering,Inc Rodriguez Architects,Inc. Quality Office Liquidations Rohadfox Construction Control Services Corporation Quanta Technology,LLC Ross&Baruzzini,Inc. Quest Corporation of America,Inc. Ross&Baruzzini,Inc. Quinines,Diez,Silva y Asoc Ross Engineering,Inc. RADISE International Roy Jorgensen Associates,Inc. Radixos RTKL Associates Inc. Rafael Vinoly Architects Rummel,Klepper&Kahl,LLP RailPros Ruth Hamberg Ranon&Partners,Inc.,Architects RWA Inc RAYMUNDO ENGINEERING CO.,INC. RWA,Inc. RCC Consultants,Inc. RW Block Consulting,Inc. RDG Planning&Design Sabiston Engineering Group,Inc. RDI Structural Engineering Inc. Saf-T-Glove,Inc. RE Chisholm Architects.com SAIC Energy Environment&Infrastructure Recreational Design&Construction SAIC Energy,Environment&Infrastructure,LLC RedZone Robotics SAIC Energy,Environment&Infrastructure,LLC Register Nelson SAK Construction,LLC REI Engineers SBLM Architects REINES&STRAZ,LLC SBM Management Services LP Reiss Engineering Schappacher Engineering,LLC Reiss Engineering,Inc. SchenkelShultz Reiss Engineering,Inc. Schlumberger Water Services Rene Gonzalez Architect,Inc. Schneider Electric Rep Services,Inc. Schneider Engineering&Consulting Co.,Inc. Resolution Management Consultants,Inc. Schreder Lighting Resolution Management Consultants,Inc. Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates,Inc. Resource Efficiency Solutions,Inc Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates,Inc. Resource Systems Group,Inc. Scotland Yard Pest Control Reynolds,Smith and Hills,Inc. Scott Crews Architecture,LLC RG Architects,PA Scott Edwards Architecture RGD Consulting Engineers SCS Engineers Richard Crotty Consulting Group SDI Environmental Services,Inc. Rich&Associates,Inc. Sean K.Simms Planners Landscape Architects LLC Rick Richards Inc SEGURA SITE WORK INC Riverside Technology,inc. Senatore Inc R.J.Behar&Company,Inc. SEQUIL Systems,Inc R.J.Heisenbottle Architects,P.A. ServiceTec International rk collaborative SFM Services.Inc. RK&K SGM Engineering,Inc. RLArchitecture,Inc. Shannon&Wilson RMA S.Harris Ltd. RMA GeoLogic Consultants,Inc. Sheeley Architects,Inc. RMEC,LLC SHEERSON PAINTING INC RM Plus,LLC Shumake Architecture,PA SimplyVerde,LLC TaskEasy Simpson Gumpertz&Heger Inc. Taylor Engineering,Inc. Singhofen&Associates,Inc. TBE Group dba Cardno TBE Sink Combs Dethlefs TDM Consulting,Inc. Skanska USA Building Technology Research&Consulting Smith&Boucher,Inc. Tectonic Engineering and Surveying Consultants,PC Smith Seckman Reid,Inc. Tectonic Engineering&Surveying Consultants PC ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE SMW GeoSciences,Inc. Telcordia Technologies,Inc. Sol-ARCH,Inc. Televate,LLC Sommerville-Wilson Inc. Terracon Consultants Inc. SoundEarth Strategies,Inc. Tessier Consulting,LLC Southeastern Surveying and Mapping Inc. Tetra Tech SOUTHERN INDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY,INC. Tetra Tech,Inc. Southern Strategy Group Tetra Tech,Inc. South Florida Lighting Team Tetra Tech,Inc. Southwest Engineering&Design,Inc. Tharp Planning Group Soyka Engineering and Associates The Ash Group,Inc. Spacecoast Architects,P.A. The Berryhill Group,LLC Spencer B.Gross of Nevada,Inc. • The Blue Book Building and Construction Network Spring Propractice The Brannon Corporation Springstead Engineering,Inc. The Centre for Grants,Contracts and Business Artifacts SSI ARBOR The Concord Group SSOE Group The Corradino Group,Inc. • Stage Door II,INC The Design Minds,Inc. Stages Consultants,LLC The Earth&Sun Energy Co LLC Stanley Consultants Inc The Ecology Group Inc. Stantec The Greenbusch Group,Inc Stantec Consulting Services Inc. The Haskell Company Stantec Consulting Services Inc. The Highmark Group Stantec Consulting Services Inc. The Image Network Inc. Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. The Jones Payne Group,Inc. Staples Golf Resource Group The Louis Berger Group starmer design group planning and architecture Ilc The Portico Group Stewart-Cooper-Newell Architects,P.A. Thermo Bond Buildings Stirling&Wilbur Engineering Group The Terracon Group Inc. Strategic Energy Group The Weiler Engineering Corporation Structural Workshop,LLC THOMAS MAINTENANCE SERVICE INC Structures Design&Consulting,Inc. Thornton Tomasetti Studio Tectonic LLC Tierra STV INC TigerDirect Suncoast Design Services,Inc. Tillman and Associates Sunera LLC Tindale-Oliver&Associates Superior Power Products LLC Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Sustainable Solutions Corporation Titsch&Associates Architects,Inc. Swaback Partners,pllc TKDA SWA Group TKW Consulting Engineers Inc. Swarco Traffic Americas,Inc. TLC Engineering for Architecture,Inc. Sweet Sparkman Architects TNS Synaesthesis,LLC Tolar Manufacturing Company Inc. SYSTRA Consulting,Inc. Tompkins Associates Tanko Lighting Topaz Lighting TRACE Consultants,Inc. Walker Parking Consultants TransAmerican Power Products,Inc. Walker Parking Consultants,Inc. TransCore Wallace Engineering TransCore Wallace Roberts&Todd,LLC Transportation Security Associates,LLC Wallis Murphey Boyington Architects,Inc. TranSystems Walter P Moore TranSystems Walter P.Moore&Associates,Inc. TRC Warner Nease Bost Architects,Inc. TRC Engineers,Inc. Water&Air Research,Inc. TRC Engineers,Inc. Water Resources Solutions,LLC TRC Worldwide Engineering Inc. Water Technology,Inc. TRC Worldwide Engineering,Inc. WDM Architects P.A. TREADWELL JONES Weber and Tinnen,PA,Structural Engineers Treanor Architects Weidlinger Associates,Inc. TriStar Commissioning,Inc. WEIDMANN Diagnostic Solutions Triumvirate Environmental,Inc. Wendel TR Transportation Consultants,Inc. Wendel Duchscherer Trugreen Landcare WEST Consultants,Inc. TruGreen LandCare WEST Consultants,Inc. TS Staffing Services,Inc. WEST Consultants,Inc. TTG Engineers Western Earth Technologies,Inc. Turner Engineering Corporation Western Oilfields Supply Company Tusa Consulting Services Westin Engineering,Inc. TVS FLORIDA,INC ARCHITECTURE Weston&Sampson T.Y.Lin International White&Smith,LLC ATTACHMENT D-VENDORS NOTIFIED VIA PUBLIC PURCHASE Universal Engineering Sciences,Inc. Wicks Engineering Services,Inc. Upland Homes Inc Widefield Technology,Inc.(WTI) Urban Design Ventures,LLC Wilder Architecture,Inc. Urban Green Studio,PLLC william b medellin architect p.a. Urn Consulting,Inc William Lane Architect URS Corporation Williams Architects URS Corporation Willow Greens Landscaping Inc URS Corporation Wilson&Company,Inc.Engineers&Architects URS Corporation Wilson Estes Police Architects,PA URS Corporation Americas Winbourne Consulting U.S.Cost Incorporated Winbourne Consulting,LLC US Funks Engineering,Inc Wingeretr Laboratories,Inc. Utility Service Company,Inc. Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners Utility Services,Inc Woolpert,Inc. Utility System Efficiencies,Inc. WorleyParsons Group Inc. valleycrest Yankon Industries ValleyCrest Landscape Maintenance Yardco Rock and Stone Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. ZABALA ERICKSON LLC Vector Engineering,Inc. ZeitEnergy Verde Architects Inc Zen Engineering,Inc. Verrando Engineering Co.Inc. ZGF Architects LLP VFA,Inc. Zyscovich Architects Visionary Integration Professionals,LLC Wade Trim Wade Trim,Inc. WALDROP ENGINEERING REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ Master Planner of the North Beach District RFQ 2015-086-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2015 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: FEBRUARY 26, 2015 ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMIBEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov I£st§'I AAA I BEACH, TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 10 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 15 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 22 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 24 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 26 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 28 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 30 RFQ 2015-086-YG 2 N\1A SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is soliciting "Statements of Qualifications" that the City may utilize to select a Master Planner for the North Beach District. The North Beach District Master Plan will be focused on the area of the City that is north of 63rd Street. The City is seeking services from a consulting firm or team with master planning, revitalization, redevelopment, design, development, and implementation experience to assist the City in: 1) developing the scope and deliverables of the desired master plan and 2) completing a master plan of the district within the agreed to scope and deliverables. For the purposes of this RFQ, the selection process will be based on qualifications. No proposal for specifics to the master plan is being requested, nor will be considered, at this time. The City of Miami Beach, Florida is located on a barrier island between the Biscayne Bay and the Atlantic Ocean, just east of the City of Miami, Florida. It is connected to the City of Miami on the mainland via four causeways. The City is the predominant tourist destination of South Florida. The City has a population of approximately 87,779, in addition to the thousands of tourist that visit each year. The study area will be the North Beach section of the City, which is located north of 63rd Street to the northern city limit at 87th Terrace. Major developments have been built and historic structures have been restored in all parts of the City in the recent past with the exception of the North Beach area, where investment has been lagging. The City has been studying ways to encourage and promote appropriate, redevelopment activity for the 71st Street Corridor and Ocean Terrace, as well as encourage the preservation and restoration of contributing buildings in the North Shore and Normandy Isles National Register Districts. In addition the City will be looking at appropriate ways to develop the City-owned "West Lots". At the request of the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach the City seeks a qualified world class consultant to establish a North Beach Master Plan. Once a qualified consultant is selected, the City expects to work with the consultant to determine the scope of services for and refined study area for the North Beach Master Plan. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). RFQ 2015-086-YG 3 AA AAA, BEAD 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued February 3, 2015 Pre-Submittal Meeting February 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions February 18, 2015 at 5:00 PM Responses Due February 26, 2015 at 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado(a,miamibeachfl.gov or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305-673-7000 ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez(c�miamibeachfl,gov 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Small Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 4142489 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be R 2 15-086 G 4 MIAMI ' A binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence."The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelg ranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 12. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of RFO 2015-086-YG 5 MIAMI BEACH Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 13. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and twenty(120)calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 14. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 15. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 16. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 17.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 18. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 19. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. w. RFQ 2015-086-YG 6 /\A ,A i BEACH 20. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 21. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where consultant is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the consultant will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The consultant shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 22. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 23. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 24. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and • have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. RFQ 2015-086-YG 7 NA,I ' ' i BEACH 25. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 26. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 27. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 28. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONSULTANT. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the consultant. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 29. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 30. INDEMNIFICATION. The consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the consultant or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the consultant shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 31. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Consultant to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the consultant. 32. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Consultant agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and RFQ 2015-086-YG 8 MIAMI BFArH conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the consultant upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 33. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 34. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 35. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2015-086-YG 9 i\\E AAA€ BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email,and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.3 Similar Experience. Provide detailed responses to the following similar experience factors: 2.3.1 Experience with large-scale(100,000 SF) projects that incorporated commercial, residential and/or institutional uses in a complex and dense urban setting. 2.3.2 Experience with pedestrian and bike-friendly Transit Oriented projects and examples of past successes in public/private partnerships. 2.3.3 Experience in establishing development programs for public-private partnerships that have been successfully implemented. 2.3.4 Familiarity and experience with the local and regional development climate and real estate markets. RFQ 2015-086-YG 10 i\AA M1 BEACH 2.3.5 Past successes in dealing with elected officials, community advisory committees and/or neighborhood businesses and residents. 2.3.6 Experience with adaptive reuse and historic preservation. 2.3.7 Skill and experience in designing public open spaces that contribute to the sense of community and place. 2.3.8 Skill and experience designing structured parking that does not detract from urban vitality and design context. 2.3.9 Urban design and master planning skills, along with the proven ability to create a sense of community and place, as well as embracing the existing eclectic elements that helps to define an area. 2.3.10 Experience conducting public charrettes as a component of public/private engagement. 2.3.11 Demonstrated success in embracing and implementing the highest standards of sustainability and environmental sensitivity. 2.3.12 Urban design and master planning skills, along with the proven ability to create a sense of community and place, as well as embracing the existing eclectic elements that helps to define an area. 2.3.13 Skill and experience in the development of land development regulations that implement a community vision. 2.3.14 Ability to work cooperatively and constructively with City staff. 2.4 Standard Form 330. The proposing firm shall submit a completed Standard From 330 (attached). No proposal will be considered without this required form. In addition to experience and qualifications considerations, the City may use this information to consider the firm's previous and current workload. 2.5 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. R Q 2015-086-YG 11 BEACH TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Proposal shall describe its approach and methodology in accomplishing the goals of this RFQ as outlined below: 1. Develop the scope and deliverables of the desired master plan in conjunction with City officials and other stakeholders as assigned by the City; 2. Complete a master plan of the district within the agreed to scope and deliverables. In describing its approach and methodology, proposer shall provide detailed responses on how it will accomplish the desired scopes of the project, by including (but not limited to)the following important elements: 1. Data collection. 2. Public input. 3. Cataloging of historical elements. 4. Environmental, storm water, sea level rise and flooding concerns. 5. Land use considerations. 6. Vision development. 7. Aesthetic standards. Proposer shall also address how it plans to incorporate Small or Disadvantaged Firms in its delivery of services. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2015-086-YG 12 SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2(Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered. by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions;or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s) (using the same criteria). Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Experience and Qualifications 60 Approach and Methodology 40 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 5 RFQ 2015-086-YG 13 4. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 10 5 5 Committee Total 92 81 85 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 85 85 72 Step 2 Points 10 5 5 Committee Total 95 90 77 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 10 5 5 Committee Total 90 79 71 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 1010 5 6-Y 14 APPENDIX A MIAMi BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 201 5-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305-673-7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No.of Employees: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five (5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A — Page 2 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, proposers shall be required to pay all covered employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Currently,the hourly living wage rate is$11.28/hr with health benefits of at least$1.64 an hour, or a living wage of not less than$12.92 an hour without health benefits. • Commencing January 1, 2015, the hourly living wage rate will be $11.62/hr with health benefits of at least $1.69 an hour,or a living wage of not less than$13.31/hr without health benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this bid, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. For further information about Living Wage requirements, please contact the City's Contracts Compliance Administrator at 305-673-7490. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other"section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave _ If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A — Page 3 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Inibal to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ2O15-086-YG . . • Appendix A — Page 4 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A — Page 5 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of_ ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B I Am BEACH " No Bid " Form RFQ N 201 5-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: it is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH DEPT. OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2015-086-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix B - Page 1 APPENDIX C MIN% \ I :. EACH Minimum Requirements 8( Specifications RFQ No . 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non- responsive and will not be considered. 1. Proposer must have a minimum of five(5) years' experience and have completed at least five(5) projects similar in scope. 2. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. The City of Miami Beach is soliciting "Statements of Qualifications"that the City may utilize to select a Master Planner for the North Beach District. The North Beach District Master Plan will be focused on the area of the City that is north of 63rd Street. The City is seeking services from a consulting firm or team with master planning, revitalization, redevelopment, design, development, and implementation experience to assist the City in the following: 1. develop the scope and deliverables of the desired master plan in conjunction with City officials and other stakeholders as assigned by the City; 2. complete a master plan of the district within the agreed to scope and deliverables. The study area will be the North Beach section of the City, which is located north of 63rd Street to the northern city limit at 87th Terrace. Major developments have been built and historic structures have been restored in all parts of the City in the recent past with the exception of the North Beach area, where investment has been lagging. The City has been studying ways to encourage and promote appropriate, redevelopment activity for the 71st Street Corridor and Ocean Terrace, as well as encourage the preservation and restoration of contributing buildings in the North Shore and Normandy Isles National Register Districts. In addition the City will be looking at appropriate ways to develop the City-owned "West Lots". At the request of the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on North Beach the City seeks a qualified world class consultant to establish a North Beach Master Plan. Once a qualified consultant is selected, the City expects to work with the consultant to determine the scope of services for and refined study area for the North Beach Master Plan. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix C — Page 1 APPENDIX D t ARA I BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 201 5-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 1.TERM OF CONTRACT. Not Applicable. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Not Applicable. 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. PRECLUSIONS. The selected Proposer(s) will not be precluded from providing architectural/engineering services to the City for a subsequent phase of this project. 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix D — Page 1 APPENDIX E AA I At\A I BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 1\it BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. The provider shall furnish to Department of Procurement, City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, Certificate(s) of Insurance which indicate that insurance coverage has been obtained which meets the requirements as outlined below: A. Worker's Compensation Insurance for all employees of the vendor as required by Florida Statute 440. B. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. . C. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. D. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than$2,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. All insurance policies required above shall be issued by companies authorized to do business under the laws of the State of Florida,with the following qualifications: The company must be rated no less than "B+" as to management, and no less than "Class V" as to financial strength, by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey,or its equivalent,subject to the approval of the City Risk Management Division. or The company must hold a valid Florida Certificate of Authority as shown in the latest "List of All Insurance Companies Authorized or Approved to Do Business in Florida" issued by the State of Florida Department of Insurance and are members of the Florida Guaranty Fund. Certificates will indicate no modification or change in insurance shall be made without thirty (30) days in advance notice to the certificate holder.. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH,FL 33139 Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the vendor of his liability and obligation under this section or under any other section of this agreement. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix E — Page 1 APPENDIX F A Ai D pArw t\ AJ /\tv\ j C Sample Contract RFQ N 201 5-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXX)OOOO(XXXXXXXXXXXX)O( FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE )0XXXXXX)OCXXXXXXXXXXXX)OCXXX)OO(XXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, a Florida X)OOCXXXXXXX having its principal office at XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the. individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted.from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or the City Manager if they are fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C— Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G— Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this .Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed 9 P by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST Budget for the Project, as set forth in 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost udg � , Schedule "D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required- revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XXXX)UCXX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX • All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, 'legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMS\A&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXX)O(XXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Historic Preservation Board /Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET lik SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. ATTACHMENT C Consultant's Response to the RFQ Page 36 of 36 02 . 26 . 2o15 015 -0 b-YG MASTER PLANNER OF THE NORTH BEACH DISTRICT City of Miami Beach, Florida�� ., ILL TN t o w n p 1 a n n PAR i n g ERS s�f•v z, ' 3„1 1<: .. i, `v-k -4 01 y.' i„/ ii? pi ' y r _. t , ' �-' /" v `� n / O 4 i ,u y� ” � .�7- . .s ma � > s7Ic r s55 ti�l . �4 � y/ l' f � - � �� ,= � , y. "yi i•. y � \ 4 tl 1:1:::',.� , �` Y , : " �r t . ,tS � �_ „ �' t, �_, :.• / Vi - "mks •% i ; -t,,,:/.- , . ,- , ,„ :Tl .,„ ,--,,,,,,., --.,,,ii,,, , ,.,,,--,-,. iiisj , - ,,, -,..--. --,-.,,,:,,,,,',!:. ---,N,...!z.; , .0, ,, i T I 7 ,-,_, -- , - ',---.e.,-; ,,...'--_. 4IP/Aot c # 1000 ...-" 'P.44:°4:-Cti;,,,* *41441111kt .1 ti,';-!1!)'''.4' i. -- --- ',,,.. - ,--;.;,.....li'',.---:--1,'.:T.7:-.,"1-4,74, ';:*-i.,.---:, ---j'-' '-':'''''','--.-‘,:-.4,..T.- '01!.:‘-', Or?' • I '7-H.---__''!'-'7--;-:. ' ------4 41:---#-.' .'- .::-'4--;i_ft:-:---T1 '-'--'-:rr‘k-*.'''''': '':=----,-ii;'--..1--:::.:,, ,,,,40, 41., , vi,,-';;-..S-,:---1--,1-;:: 4ir:': is 7';''':.3.-ii,..:`' ,:.,,a, •. -:' ' '...4-d pp -, -',-1-:-.5-,-_:i , 4 ii- .,,‘, 't j 6 j .i v,""Nitt.'"‘"-....,‘,.‘*44.kt! .r.,,';;;: .‘-'-',,,.:,.!?-gii t.,1,404k.7.1 _ ..: .'-.--,-,11P------, ,-.147,44,---,. .-- '---..`, oo, / y � / h'7`-. . � , s ,„ '-- ,, , ,i 7 „ .„-',1,-,..-4-;, , _ ,, „A/4p/ . , ,yam -*it,: s • i ' - - '-----1,-T-'"'-; ,.fili*;---.4:/r. (4,,,,,. - .,- °'° :- „ -- -----ii--- -,-.:i .-,,,,;i:_A,:_,„;,-- .Ns t ) t y::-Ot-':''-7-..4-;;g1ti%4;t°7--t1, ,-- * ---i lii-t,::- ri,-,<0"----,-_ -- ::=1),,!;,,,,- ----4,,45",- ,-,. *:,,,- - ,.---';i'--F • 440010, � �� am i.t �+ c# ,♦ �t -/ �. ,,y-A-1*--;igiktea,c,;;=-: ,,-: ;''';'"il"." .' 1.)„:*'=""!: )"'--: -:-:4 -.*'-:;4:--- -":"%:-:4*7:. .!."'*'',"- - -„------ DovER, KOHL & PARTNERS t o w n p l a n n i n g February 26, 2015 Alex Denis, Director Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 RE: RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District Dear Members of the Selection Committee: We are very excited to have received your Request for Qualifications (RFQ).Your request fits neatly with the strengths of our firm and the project team we have assembled. We are inspired by Miami Beach's forward-thinking planning goals from sea level rise and storm resilience to historic preservation, from your commitment to walking, biking and transit to your dedication to public involvement. It would be a pleasure to work with the leaders and citizens of North Miami Beach to develop a Master Plan for the North Beach and turn planning goals into a tangible, achievable reality. We're a local team with an international reputation. We look forward to bringing the knowledge we have gained working around the country and across the world to our local community. We also employ a proven approach that supports genuine public participation. For over twenty-five years we have earned a solid reputation for engaging, visually-oriented town planning on behalf of local governments, redevelopment agencies, private developers, and community groups all over the country. We call our approach "designing in public." The more hands on the plan the better— this means more ideas, more supporters of the plan, more excitement, and less opposition when it comes to plan implementation. Our firm has done award-winning plans for hundreds of Florida communities and dozens of coastal communities, yet creating a plan is not a "one-size-fits-all" job. We understand that it is important to study the details of what makes a place unique, and then use this analysis as a foundation for a plan that is sensitive to and builds upon the attributes of a place. We have assembled an acclaimed group of professionals to collaborate on this important planning effort. Our team members are experts in town planning, urban design, multimodal transportation planning, economic strategies, sustainable urbanism, and environmental and sea level rise development strategies. Our qualifications and past projects show how we adapt our techniques for each specific situation, and we look forward to evolving the approach for creating the Master Plan for the North Beach District with you. We look forward to our next conversation with you. You may contact me or Hernan Guerrero, Project Director, at 305- 666-0446 if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, DOVER, KOHL&PARTNERS Jason Kcr(g, AIC , CNU-A Principal jking @doverkohl.com 1571 Sunset Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33143 T(305)666-0446 F(305)666-0360 doverkohl.com TABI COVER LETTER be MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS TABLE OE CONTENTS TAB 1 - COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 1.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE 1.1 REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT �APPENIDX A) 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS PAGE 1.8 TAB 2 - EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM PAGE 2.2 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM PAGE 2.37 2.3 SIMILAR EXPERIENCE PAGE 2.65 2.4 STANDARD FORM 330 PAGE 2.71 2.5 FINANCIAL CAPACITY PAGE 2.103 TAB 3 - APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3.1 GENERAL APPROACH PAGE 3.1 3.2 METHODOLOGY PAGE 3.2 ° >a � y/ - /< - - sip¢� ' 3 4i 41 {j 1 j Fi1 t ''''"4" - �, :,,,,,..;'''4''': j y t il ; ':' : f r r W 3: RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 APPENDIX A iV I AiV\ I BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire Requirements Affidavit RFQ N 201 5-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.1 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl dz Partners Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez,CPPB 305-673-7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME:The Image Network, Inc. of Delaware No.of Employees:13 No of Years in Business:28 No of Years in Business Locally:28 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Dover, Kohl & Partners FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS):1571 Sunset Drive CITY:Coral Gables STATE:FL ZIP CODE:33143 TELEPHONE NO.:305 666-0446 TOLL FREE NO.: FAx No.:305 666-0446 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS:1571 Sunset Drive CITY:Coral Gables STATE:FL ZIP CODE:33143 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Hernan Guerrero ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.:305 666-0446 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL:hguerrero @doverkohl.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.:56-1577628 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. 1.2 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES 1�/� NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an sublic sector agency? YES ✓ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.3 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same may be amended from time to time,proposers shall be required to pay all covered employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Currently,the hourly living wage rate is$11.28/hr with health benefits of at least$1.64 an hour,or a living wage of not less than$12.92 an hour without health benefits. • Commencing January 1, 2015, the hourly living wage rate will be $11.62/hr with health benefits of at least $1.69 an hour,or a living wage of not less than$13.31/hr without health benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this bid,under which the City may,at its sole option, immediately deem said proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. For further information about Living Wage requirements, please contact the City's Contracts Compliance Administrator at 305-673-7490. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? 01 YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other"section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not I Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health ✓ ✓ Sick Leave ✓ Family Medical Leave ✓ Bereavement Leave ✓ ✓ 1 If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 1.4 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl St Partners 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt \\(-, Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 _ Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 15 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 1.6 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners I f- PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. _ Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Joseph Kohl Vice President Signature of Proposer's A orized R resentati Date: 02/25/2015 State of FLORIDA ) On this day of Fp8Rairy ,20_,personally appJoseph Kohl eared before me 7.jeseph_Kaht who County of 3y e ) stated that (s)he is the v eg'rlcgrdent of tw rk + ; a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: ' +s en omas •_ ,L. •, cry.--) -� �- ---- --�' -p_ ,= `��, ��--4 Notary u Ilc or he date of Florida °"°"' My Commission Expires: y :o�� .`''a,� KRISTEN T � Y P Jul 6,2018 . r I , s ay Public•StAt®.e9 F< Ida July 6,2018 ', I'I�, ; Comm.Expires Jul 6.2016 r. .,•,,„ Commission ie FF 101136 _4 _- Wr'�_ ti_. .__ .._ 4 ....ti Nom.- .., %— G ,ti_. ,- . . �_ rc .._. RFQ 2015-086-YG Appendix A— Page 6 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.7 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 TAB 2 EXPERIENCE do QUALIFICATIONS CD 2.3 i rn i r Experience Founded in 1987, Dover, Kohl & Partners has over 25 years of experience in a wide variety of planning projects and challenges including cityfcounty- wide planning,form-based coding, new community master plans,commu- nity revitalization plans,corridor plans.We employ a proven public process that allows us to handle planning projects of any size and complexity. Specific project descriptions,references and qualifications can be found in Tab 2 of this response. Our business licence along with the professional licences for the engineers and architects on our team are provided on the following pages. _......, - i1'( 1.t,ta ,ar t - tEtt t � l`_,," -' 7.;74`c- /*.. ,, ,„,,,,_w,y—,- ,.---.... .wiriiiir f`p =asl�yi� tri” , Yfctr ice - :^r `,r.�..,..-s Y � r E ` 't► .!!i 1!111' _.,...„,,,,,i,._- . j ,! J;t /i�¢� q 3> r; ! 'i ii ice : we (s i � ., �,. //�,t-� _i�,. '� �"r ' ad ♦ r • - ;i, {.` //�� /��,rf> Tirit;z1; '/�rx: '\�% .rs►� t f w'" f !.,,.." „,� "�..7,i' ."/ .tars { �[ • : .g _ s --' ` ct �°- °". t;`f-�kT tea .., ,' -. r c 9 ------.4t4,- ,-- 'fiz.-i,,,Ir teil-, ',..c. , - sf .P. 11/A ;,.. ,-- _- ,-, -? ' ,,_ .4.,-,4.1- -0,,, t t�/ -,-,-fA- -\\.:, ,,Nr... 1` .1!* �,t / . T s � / V.:ko-foti(el:'''---,'" .- -- as:: -- .--- -,i i , - -=?"'" '--- -*•••c.:414'-f -a fa.___, '-': ‘ 1' ,%" -%'- \ ,7-----,--,,,, ---- - .-- - '--' ''';a-Ni/ ';5„--, -v-'''"- - ---- - - -a\ ,' '. 1'I :'4 IIIM -- '-','' - ,-'-'. 31-, - '--"VZC, a, '',=',/, 7- ,... ., _. , -,,,,-,-- , ---', - --.;- , ,-.,,,- -,, ,,......,--------i7., :-, ,,,,,..- - - ,,, ,, ,,,,,-, ,,,-,-, - ..,,- -,,,-, -‘ ,—.1, --_----,,,,, , .;,,.-2 - -,... ,, , f ::,,,,,‘,,,,,,,,,,, --t,-,, , , , - ,,,,s...:,,.., -_,‹,,,,,,,,-, ., -,,,, -,,,,,,:„. . „,> --..., , .-„r ,, ,;,, a ` e/ 1% ��4 �j�ttrwtg� -" f/ x%lerr:~; `� ste�,y •,v , /y/ ' t ` ' c �r ./�' 't Et , ,.,,, 4 `, -4111L:._.-,4 -' - 5,;,':#- ''' ' ' 't '''-''. ' •-„,i4 r i„" r: i?i� r f-:t :44 , 4 N s . ,..;,,..,,,:„.7 • / 4v.' 1.8 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners L., State of or • a Department of State I certify from the records of this office that THE IMAGE NETWORK,INC. OF DELAWARE is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on October 9, 1987. The document number of this corporation is P16320. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 13, 2014,. and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Thirteenth day of January, 2014 etr - 16rAN (loti4A Secretary of State Authentication ID:CC1639979331. To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this ID,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.sunbiz.org/certauthver.html RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.9 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 000871 ue %i //, fc% : y y- y � � ice//�y a � /� -rs /i 3 Luc£�i .z' r ice . �: ii'/ i _,:G / /tom 2521 2tl 's s � � iii�i �� / � %�3= � � �� i�f �� ice/ ��'% 'y y � y� ' f � ��</� Btit INE 0,._NAME/LOCATION / RECEIPT NEB y ES D1 ERK 1L&P T 7'� i y i, ��/'a /ice' - %/ i � �' s/ � i i /� �s: 1,5? /F sy OWNER SEC.TYPE t7F�BUSINESS THE IMAGE-NETWORK INC _ 212 CONSULTANT BY TAX RECE11OR•BY TAX tALLECT01t_ Asa oo /20/2014 �, f HECK2I-14-0 52480 This local BusinessTax Receipt on confirms payment of the Local Business Tax.The Receipt'is not a license, permit.ors certification of the holes alifications,to do business.Holder must 4,--:,-,. .,w�rany goveranental or overnmental regulatory law a requirements which apply to the busines The RECEIPT No,above must be displayed on alf Commerc al vehicles Miami—Dade Code Sec 8a 276. may.; , For more lnfonnation,visitww miainidade.Qmrhaxcollecfo� 1.10 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS SBE PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work. 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER J.S.K. International, Inc. DBA JSK Architectural Group 1982 625712278 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 137 Giralda Avenue a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Coral Gables Fl _33134 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE NAICS 541310 7.NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office) Jorge S. Kuperman,AIA 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS (305)448-1986 j.kuperman @jskarchitecturalgroup.co 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S) Of any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index Code b.Discipline b.Experience Number (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) 02 Administrative 1 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangers 2 06 Architect 1 C10 Commercial Buildings(Low Rise) 2 08 CADD Technician 1 D07 Dining Hall;Clubs;Restaurant 2 37 Interior Design 1 H08 Historical Preservation 1 48 Project Manager 3 H09 Hospital&Medical Facilities 1 H11 Housing(Residential,Multi-Family 1 105 Interior Design;Space Planning 1 001 , Office Buildings; Industrial Parks 2 R06 Rehabilitation-Buildings,Structure 1 Other Employees Total 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 9,_``= = 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 4. $500;000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work '''_ `; , 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater " 2.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -2 LThe foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE g, `.'{ lb,DATE le,&„„....... RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.11 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 JORGE KUPERMAN'S-STATE OF FLORIDA 1 ARCHITECTURAL LICENSE .: ,�....., .' TM i.3er is«mam f i Otdr tL.gti�isfoet e# r >�iatia.des.a TY!t.I .. . s azea:.3 V dil.LliB v.3333FN uz x,„¢. 1 !+..€449 -_....._ _.....__._: Act > . ! JSK ARCHITECTURAL GROUP -STATE OF FLORIDA FIRM'S ARCHITECTURAL LICENSE "°""`"""" +I ii =ratios .u,AG s 1 .4. I Emig' 131)4''''...911t- 1 *W r ariLlir____. rwrNearmsr� JSK INTERNATIONAL INC- STATE OF FLORIDA c �. ► m" CORPORATE'S ARCHITECTURAL LICENSE ;; s°`s"'�."'"; Sir a1T1e? ' IMPL tldrt.at.,P 3.. i; j JSK INTERNATIONAL INC. DBA : JSK ARCHITECTURAL GROUP ' :) e . STATE OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LICENSE ' . " t : / - ,. v iii.-/��" �' #mow+✓ Wart tEVIIMIX .aA.Yl.1111.41.f iratrammosma JORGE KUPERMAN - STATE OF FLORIDA °erwcrw. �.. "�orworw'. TM. GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE Z""A33 ai15N) or �uiRIOUIR SY 1,-.";PI n.. iienuor.w.' 7 1.12 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1. SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2015-086-YG PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a. FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER Chen Moore and Associates 1986 859459547 2b. STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 155 South Miami Avenue, Penthouse II-A a.TYPE 2c. CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Miami FL 33130 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Yes(Broward CDBE,State of FL MBE) Cris Betancourt,RLA.,Dir.Of Planning and Landscape Architecture 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Chen Moore and Associates 6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS 786.497.1500 cbetancourt@chenmoore.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Chen and Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1986 859459547 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Profile c.Revenue a.Function c.No.of Employees Code b.Experience Index Number Code b.Discipline (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH PO4 Pipelines(Cross-country-Liquid&Gas) 5 12 Civil Engineers 17 5 S13 Stormwater Handling&Facilities 6 08 CADD Technicians 10 3 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 5 15 Construction Inspectors 2 3 R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings;Structures; 1 16 Construction Managers 2 0 P13 Public Safety Facilities 1 02 Administrative 5 1 T03 Traffic&Transportation Engineering 1 39 Landscape Architect 3 0 UO2 Urban Renewals;Community Development 2 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost Engineering and 2 S11 Sustainable Design 1 Z01 Zoning;Land Use Studies 2 V01 • Value Analysis;Life-Cycle Costing 1 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 3 R11 Rivers Canals;Waterways;Flood Control 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies,Assessments 1 103 Industrial Waste Treatment 1 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;Areawide& 2 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 C10 Commercial Building;(low rise);Shopping 2 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking 3 Other Employees 0 0 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 Total 39 12 C15 Construction Management 4 Total 39 12 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million b.Non-Federal Work 6 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater c.Total Work 6 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a. SIGNATURE b. DATE February 20, 2015 • c. NAME TITLj P r M 47 P.E., LEED AP, President AUTHORIZEJ?S F!'LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 6 MANDATO- + DATE OF •. 54 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 1.13 Dover,Kohl 6E Partners February 26,2015 TAB 2 - EXPERIENCE & Q UALIFICATIONS - An interdisciplinary team is fundamental to understanding how planning issues - P are interrelated and require integrated solutions. The Dover, Kohl & Partners team contains national and regionally local experts who are familiar with work- g-: 1 ing together and in teams on complex planning assignments. lgtizs 1� The team is comprised of veterans in not only public participation and com- munity outreach, but in urban design, town planning, multimodal transpor- tation, pedestrian and bike-friendly Transit Oriented Development, historic 3-r- ., f-. preservation, landscape architecture, economic analysis, water management and advanced sea level rise solutions, civil engineering and visualizations. This combined experience makes our team uniquely qualified to meet the oppor- I'4 tunities and challenges which will arise in the development of the North Beach District Master Plan. Dover, Kohl & Partners team includes: 1 ' : • DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS .,� " �, - s r° -4 0 i TOWN PLANNING & PUBLIC PARTICIPATION f v.;= z wok ,,....._ 1 3� .. - - t • STREET PLANS COLLABORATIVE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION & BIKABILITY i "` - -- • ARCADIS ; WATER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS & SEA LEVEL RISE °ms -il - • GOODKIN CONSULTING - ECONOMIC ANALYSIS • JSK ARCHITECTURE GROUP HISTORIC PRESERVATION &ARCHITECTURE �°-:, • CHEN MOORE & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE An introduction to each firm,similar projects, and key personnel can be found `` - on the following pages.Sub-sections in this tab include: 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM PAGE 2.2 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM PAGE 2.37 2.3 SIMILAR EXPERIENCE PAGE 2.65 y 2.4 STANDARD FORM 330 PAGE 2.71 2.5 FINANCIAL CAPACITY PAGE 2.103 'b�'w..ray •. .. :±fr .,ham-` vl`a s F M�Il"j �„s� . RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.1 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 I 2 . 1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS is best known for public design charrettes, detailed master plans, and illustrative codes that emphasize complete neighborhoods as the basis for sound communities. Founded in 1987, our expertise lies in balancing the visionary'civic art' of planning with the practical consensus building needed to make projects succeed. We are trained in � the principles of traditional town planning and have erfected �� y techniques for gathering meaningful community input. Our plans focus on smart growth, sustainability, emphasizing _ P 9 - P 9 � � that there does not have to be a trade-off between livability, • economic prosperity, and environmental concerns. fly sa +r;j‘tfauiwgitAl erc4 nisriu t -_� �` Community involvement is an integral component in all of our � F �-"-,� �= projects. The Dover-Kohl team has numerous techniques for building consensus and helping communities establish imple- mentable plans that guide future growth and decision-making. Our hands-on, visual approach merges design studio, policy- making, and town meetings. Often our projects have revealed potential in overlooked real estate and have helped to chal- lenge outdated zoning or transportation policies. Dover-Kohl's experience includes a national and international portfolio of work in a variety of settings. The common thread linking all of the firm's projects is the holistic approach to community building,which includes the formation of complete settlements offering a mix of uses and dwelling types,an interconnected network of walkable streets,and building forms and architecture that reinforce the unique character of the place.We believe that design is the missing element in much of contemporary town planning, and our work centers on re-introducing form and design into master plans, resilience plans,comprehensive plans,and policy and land development regulations. We create accessible strategies for sustainable development,specializing in plans and visualizations that focus on the physical aspects of future growth and conservation. Victor Dover and John Massengale's new book, Street Design: The Secret to Great Cities and Towns is on bookshelves now. Our work has been published in Progressive Architecture, in Metropolitan Home, in numerous planning journals, and has been featured on National Public Radio, CNN's Earthwatch, and in Business Week. Dover-Kohl projects have also been profiled in The New Urbanism by Peter Katz, Rural By Design by Randall Arendt, Sustainable Urbanism by Douglas Farr, Retrofitting Suburbia by Ellen Dunham-Jones, Form-Based Codes by Daniel Parolek, as well as Land Use Strategies and Public Participation Tools, both published by the Center for Livable Communities. Numerous Dover-Kohl projects have received American Planning Association (APA) Awards, including the Downtown Plan for Richmond, VA, the Downtown Plan and recent SmartCode for Montgomery, AL, Prospects for Southeast Lee County DR/GR for Lee County, FL and the Jamestown Mall Area Plan in St. Louis, MO. The firm has also received Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) Charter Awards for I'On in Mount Pleasant, SC; City Plan 2025 for Fayetteville, AR; Glenwood Park in Atlanta, GA; and the Dennis Port Revitalization Plan in Dennis, MA. The awarded Plan El Paso a 2011 National Award for Smart Growth Excellence in Programs, Policies,and Regulations. Dover-Kohl's work has received the Driehaus Form-Based Codes Award three times since its inception in 2007 for Towns,Villages,Countryside Land Development Regulations in St. Lucie County, Florida; the Compact Communities Code for Lee County, Florida; and most recently the 2012 award for the Bradenton Form-Based Code for Bradenton, Florida. Victor Dover and Joseph Kohl are charter members of the CNU and have worked for many public agencies,developers, and citizen groups to create successful master plans and strategies for land development and regulation.Victor Dover served on the LEED for Neighborhood Development Core Committee and is a former Board Chair of the CNU.Joseph and Victor were key players in the creation of the Form-Based Codes Institute and the National Charrette Institute, both leading think tanks for sustainable urbanism and community-based planning. 2.2 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners REVITALIZING DOWNTOWNS & HISTORIC PLACES Y$4u. Many cities are rediscovering the heart of town. Physical design, organization, management, and promotion are all part of resuming work on the settlements already started and that's the iii,''";'. „� � ultimate in"smart growth." PLANNING CITIES & REGIONS -., ¢. Metropolitan regions are the essential economic unit today,while environmental concerns call '�, „ -J for stewardship of the even larger bio-region. The best new regional plans bridge the gap :,- =- between close-up details and the big picture. „.. ,Y 4 DESIGNING NEW NEIGHBORHOODS & TOWNS fl', e Dover, Kohl& Partners designs highly marketable new neighborhoods with places to live,work ,, -,, and shop within walking distance. These new traditional neighborhoods are more functional, 3 efficient, enduring and memorable than routine subdivisions. .,,.,i,----sidt.mil ' = RETROFITTING SUBURBIA Making existing,in-town neighborhoods more desirable places to live,work or invest is the key #,_ to curbing outward sprawl. At the same time suburbia can be made more livable and complete. - - :- -7.,-� REINVENTING CORRIDORS Great streets are rarely unintended. Most are the result of intentional design decisions made r,- by visionary people, institutions, or communities. Balancing pedestrian and vehicular needs is 4 essential to creating vibrant places where people and cars can coexist. "_ °° SHAPING TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT , Creating compact, complete communities focused around transit has become a fast growing trend. Rising oil prices and traffic congestion are just two of the reasons driving the movement livij toward Transit Oriented Development. 1rAA:,2 T FORM- BASED CODES FOR MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE CLIENTS .ii..ai #w,..■'■ Redevelopment opportunities and increasing market pressure to create value in urban areas �� .•, nor: �.4�, ono.. has helped pave the way for mixed-use urban infill projects. These projects are creating safe• `.:t ,, , and vibrant places where people can work and live. Lillirt-",....tii RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.3 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 seven al 50 counties • years Client: Southeast Florida Regional Partnership ,, Contact: Marcela Camblor-Cutsaimanis, AICP,Project Director, Sustainable Communities �� Initiative,Treasure Coast € f --- � ` Regional Planning Council o �-�= �,_ 772.708.1108 marcela @marcelacamblor.com ,fr„ y � Years: 2011-2013 I[ Planning for Resilience i \ -- South Florida's many coastal cities and barrier %-' , islands are already beginning to see the impacts � �<ii- of climate change.Seven50 modeled the poten- tial % a � _y y tial severity in Southeast Florida,and describes `'" ».� ' - - ` ap t r o»`# - ` -- strategies for adaptation,retrofit,and retreat. The Pr�Jrr The plan makes a Comm t will to low-lying, Seven50 ("seven counties, 50 years") is a blueprint for growing a more prosperous and resilient high-investment places that will see future in Southeast Florida during the next 50 years and beyond.The plan works to encourge socially inclusive vestments in resilience infrastructure. communities,a vibrant and robost economy,and careful stewardship of the fragile Southeast Florida ecosystem as it quickly becomes one of the world's most important mega-regions. =` -- Dover,Kohl&Partners led a multidisciplinary consultant team to create the plan,mapping a strategy ' -- for the best possible quality of life for the over six million residents in Monroe,Miami-Dade,Broward, i' ° Palm Beach,Martin,St.Lucie and Indian River counties.Dover-Kohl worked closely with the South f Florida and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councils and led a multi-disciplinary team of consul- ,.: ,, ,: - tants that included leading regional and national experts such as Carras Community Investment, Cardno-Entrix,Jean Scott,HDR Engineering,MetroQuest,Duany Plater-Zyberk&Company,Criterion 1.Existing Conditions Planning,and Roar Media,among others. �' , �� - The Process lirtf;"„:-;; a �% Seven50 included an extensive public process using both interactive online forums and hands-on live ;�' events.Online forums included polling,interactive mapping of civic and cultural assets throughout the ' region,a Data Warehouse,which is a collection of GIS layers for the region that is viewable without proprietary software,an online scenario modeler,and active Facebook and Twitter conversations. Rio ""eet,'no adaptation Project events included television and radio appearances,four regional summits,travelling roadshows - -f=- in each county,and several planning directors'forums. Each live event included multiple methods of gathering information from the public including keypad polling,keshot videos,one-word cards trans I:- x lated word clouds, small table discussions, one-on-one conversations, and surveys.Overall the a y process reached over a million different people in a region of six million. y 3 The project's executive committee consisted of regional leaders from university vice presidents =rte and local artists to DOT,EPA and US HUD representatives.Citizen workgroups met throughout the - plan to address the issues they deemed most important,including Growing the Economy,Celeb.rat- ing Arts&Culture,Valuing the Environment,Climate&Energy Resilience,and Inclusive Regional 3 Rise of 8 feet,no adaptation Leadership.The Seven50 Southeast Florida Prosperity Plan established existing conditions,mod- j � � �� ,�� elect the future,and provided specific suggestions as to how municipalities, individuals, and the " ' - private sector could all work to improve the quality of life in the region. Status . .`;` - Numerous independent coalitions have been formed to implement strategies and ideas presented d, ��- ;�? � within the document.Coalitions formed to build transit oriented development,implement the regional ;i %- % --- business plan,and bulwark the coast are just a few examples of ongoing efforts.Implementation will continue for the next 50 years and beyond. 4.Rise of 8 feet,significant adaptation 2.4 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1 Creating A Region in Motion ,.. Seven50: An Innovative, i•.,,.,.1 Preferred • Proee- -,, ' ' -'-'-- '- ' ' ---,,,,---;„ - _-, ... , , ,,... , 1-- ' -- - 1- Scenario: ... , , ,,,-- - ,, ....„- .,,, 1 . r ' 4 i - • ',='----- NI . • -- 'C, , ;;, -,,k,i A - t .1! in irt Region in Motion - 11 •. ,...,,„,,,,, ,,,,,,,,...„_ ..,..,,, ,,,,,, , ,.,- ,r -1.'-t-----%,-,-4?-,--,v4,-,--4 -_,-,--- ,,,,-,,,,,, r. Of the many possible futures investigated by the '- . . ---..,,,s,.., --,---e--- ,.. project the Region in.Motion scenario chosen 7 li 4ry' 0:i -... ---- '-', , by the public involved a high percentage of new .--r44,-.4'. ro , , _ 4 in * Pr, -',-,,,, -,-- residents living in walkablA new neighborhoods ( - - ; %-;----=--.,-----4---f---,4-;%-.---4--, - --.04-1.-4 ,----- -,:--_-- . rail walkable • i,r ,,,;-, - ailing existing rail lines that extend from Key • --_, 1,-- .„ , .‹.-- -_ , - . . iii, - W est to Sebastian Inlet.Street design for the re- ' 4, # .; -; , -,.----,- .. , ,‘, „, gion is upgraded for multi-modalism.The region _ ea" -_ - s‘i;iiiist) provided a forum f&*!,,povit of all A,,. attracts young,highly paid,information economy • • pub- ,,--- backgrounds to work togethetto,mermoo, ? workers.Compact development maximizes- „ • . . „,----,-, ,,,---3„•-_,„„,-,. „,,,, region's future. To r000lfies.,14twitmoriti lic investment in infrastructure and services. ,<„,. -_-., ;, 1"1.1 • ' d house.v -- -----' Veiti**4000eiliccohilk worlostmoth ,i Climate change adaptation greenhouse ''..`„"0 :',' ,,,,;', ixvyliailt**gikitti ,,,l'., '2 reduction is a major priority for ail**publi ,d,' --- - *141030*Attresepttthe, ,,,„,,- ot,,• and private projects„ - .., ' \---- , I--4-i:1.f,,-.i.-1.f 7,e ; --'-- beiianinat eaalyin004eh*140 . . I - - ; beeliliOedbrthaqSandt* ' i” LEGEND * --t:, 18404a4:44 quiditodi . , . ......f.,-, govitmv... • - ,..„ . .tovoyirsorvii,...,-:,, -:- Commuter-Raii ' % --- -,-,'.- ---,e- --,,---.,,•;- .:,,,' , ;.‘ ',,.,:‘,4,. '4,...i.„,44,"., 4.1.tv.k,..",, ' ' ..,>.. \ • Transit Stop, '* 1 41111 TransitOriented Development Area II ES . -. ,'.,, Preserved Natural Areas&Parks 4k 1 4111)*Farmland — ,...._. I. - ..%,--.-- - - la Areas Vulnerable to 2'Sea Level Rise til•Illl*".• ) , ._a-_x_pt . . . • _a is M Areas Vulnerable to High Water Events „... 4' '1 ....... Potential areas for Reinforced Co,, t I' - - ” - 101 , .1-Vo --,-f---;---- ,,.„,f., ___, Directed Growth - ;v- — •: ,, ,_ {*i .,-*'';'-5 Seven59: A pypanl f.,,,,r. an, . - -,--- , ' '', ■,-.'V, ..' • , _ 1 Sr FI,via .l•% _I Reit er t,1 PI Ji , ---.% .N r , •vr ' , --,-;-=' -;-•:-..f.. - ,t., „.., 4,,,,, ;,,,-,- -,,,---„,-; -- .. . mr ------ *,1* - -.- , ,- -;- --- ---- - , -,-,)--- r - q , -,-,--,z,----1,;--;.-i.- 0 , t„," fj..,‘',:. ---.-- - ':' " T.:*;::-W7,'S'-'1-?- '.-- '::::; ' ,..14frit''—'144• '5, * -- ' • , ,r,„; ,,,,,-, „,,;,./_,„->_,,,,,,,,,,„„-,-,,,, _ , _,L-,"----,S-,4,4,,, ..„.-•7.:- %, ••. ' frf".'--,,-,,-- _ _A,.> , -- , •7 ',.i,.- -- "::F-_,--_:;_:' ::1 ,,_ • 0114,=#'•,4.f-- --, ',"s= _„,„ 3_„„ > '-- fr---';,- .." ' -,"5-3-t---------,= ,-----,--,2------- ,3-X-- ;:"...4= .--;--,':::',-,„--- ,----,-..„..„ ,,,....:„,----- ,---,.,-2: -,... ,--2- ill -'-:::,.---,---;--"- -------',----;-_-,----,"--" -'-------,50-,-- ------,5---- _*-0- „, 0>'-',,--- -, ,--,% t.. ' - 7- ------F-- - -- 1 -eo-- -,-c-e-,-0 -0 It - --=-2:-:,->-;-- -,---0.--.--.,---,_.,.;-->-- --_, __:- -: -==,-,,%-:,- ,,,,,,..--.- ; ,-,. ;,-_---,:.-,-.; , . __:., „.,_.„., OP --i---,-;--- -a!-;-.a-_ -:%-a:"' : --,;', ---_,4 I-a;:"r. ' , -',--ar---f:-,,Z-,,*' ,,a. <-4-,Kr-r ' , vcr , rt:Zi,, -- -----, , ,_„,,,,--- A... - ,- -'1-";,:5;:`---=,-. „A:---3,'„---1,--,-.1,-,-,.-4,-,,,,,---,,f--, 4 - - l''0' .;;;."' i3.„; '", 4:'," --'',--e4,-,,,-. .,-,-- ,,,,--,,--,'>...,,,,,-„,%-=-----,- ------------ -i• — ' ' .--i44.----E,-:-.--,--,:,- -;,,- .,,,,, -,..--,,- _-,----_--- -,--",-- ,-----,-,---,,,---,-_,-----------„--,----, ,V",--,00-",,, ' • --%'' ,-,;%-"-;,,-,"„:--,-' -•-• '",-,'„ ---0-,, , - ,•," /-,----':-%--?,-,,-,=:,-,--"'."- ------,.-----,./,-.:. ,,"- ,_,,•,„ • _, - ' * •;-="--*"('''.,-,-,,,,- ,---,',„0 * fg - ,;-.,"•;-*WO 0 6 4 '',$-:. , --- „,,, ,,- -e- _..- *- fp w---,),-ri-A4,-;,---:-_*-1-1:2-__A -.., -• --,-,, -- ,---- -,---,-- ;,--,-,------,--,#- el ,,,, ,,,,,,,v-33-3_,-;,-;,--;------;; 1 _ The Seven5O Plan is aliving,dynamic document - -- --- -,, - - % ;,-..--'..7 f/-*- —,',VA>, '__-___ 44.K.1_, , ,, , ,-;_. _,,„ ,„,_-_- ..,.._ ,,-- _ -,-,. ,,-, - ,,->„- -_,-- - -J., -„,,, online...e. .,,,,,,,„,„,„Report , ..,, ,,,, s,..iA.,,,,t 0 iline The AVPOJ k wa4,'„.-" . ,su in,',,4,ti/110417 ,, ,. ,,..., ,- „ visual, an emphasis on inolioltylindOsebiii4 ..-m -,----,-- - ,-,---- --- -,0---;---- ---,---„,,,,,,,--------3.------..--, _,—,------- -5---,-=--„0:,,,-- .--:,----,-,„,_.,-----,-,---„,„.--- ;=--.0 ,---:,..-----. --I ity,,Vibrant lefegre'PhICS,00 : '.-,-,Inaps,a04,,, -- -,'--= = - ,= '- -- ------' '- ---,-- ,-._p.,,-' o-ro- '- -- -' mow'imagery_.,_ .- iniaaery are"-Preiehl Ofeveryfiage,slpf,,,,„ ,,,,--„‹,--,--,.„-_,-,%--; '-----;-.---,_4-=----_,:5- .-- --:,„%-----„,-,----I-s, --------- --;-------e----w,-----5--5-_-„, -,,,---- --!----,,,,,,,--------- _:4---,-,._3-i„,-,-- -3-;---=-:-i- , itoiiii. to at.2,,,,,..,„,,,,,.,.'„,,,i,„......,,,,,,,,„„,...41,, s level,,,,,t rise , ----,„...< - -- -:::::::,,, ,,--------;-,--- --;:=4:----- -,----< ,'",,,,-----:1------ -0----_-%-------/--------=,---...--:%5ft---- ---,---p..:--,...---,-,---, pip3r,inv complex vumili,l, ,. , ,irt5i , , diversifying the entitiOyOlifolle t at' kt 40 e , ,,e ,,pit',4 S e o t .,-* the repOrteVial.tontribVted from notable experts a in the region. ,- , , ,1 ,,,---,,,,---,----,-,s----=- ---------e.;. ' ------_--- ---- -f---,-- - ,-- , -5;-,3-4--,--- „<---;:,-,;;,%-,,ti--;--,"4,-;,-4-%0---- --c-,---_------;-ii,-------- -- ' - -- -- •----- - , , --_,, 4 .,,- .i. ;- -,;'g--,,,v s,,,.'t"4•%;=:! 0:-, ' - • ',, -%,,; - --1,4-41.'1- ,..-,4-'- ",.4-/, --›--,---e,- - ----,-•-,----% ..,---„,-. ,-,,-;---,,,*- ,.-,----'---,0 „.---- -- -.‘„,,,---, -..„-,%-- _, „, - 0•:. „.,- ,,,,--,----,,,,,,-;,.--•-,,,-,-,,,,,„-,,- ,,---,„,...„ -,,.,-,-,,,,,,,, -,„,,.,,,, a-,,, ..,A,'-', , --,....-_,:-/------,-" View the rePPr,-4 wWw."17efulur4V90.0r9 , 2 , . -" ---;-- - --e„Ae‘ -4 -%-; -,,'--,S- RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.5 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Plan El Paso El Paso, TX Client: City of El Paso,TX %% �0- ��ii,�/ ice i Contact: Carlos Gallinar,AICP,CNU A, ,, --.�� -� : ' ° -� d Deputy Director City Development Department,City of El Paso ter- y 4 " 91 . 1.4662 ,--— . _ "°-,- 55 GallinarRC @elpasotexas.gov . z„..7 Years: 2010-2012(ongoing assistance) AIL 4. _.„ s bpi . / s s s —41 w _ — °: c� - 3 -1, , :ii <� �.,.' r L._.-1, 3 The Project In 2010 the City of El Paso commissioned Dover,Kohl&Partners to create a detailed Comprehensive ..., ,,,,,.„ pr, - Plan and regional-scale Future Land Use Map for the city. The Comprehensive Plan is an overarching policy document that directs the City of El Paso in its implementation of consensus-based goals cre- Central Park created on relocated rail lines ated through an extensive public process. The goals,objectives,and strategies of the plan involve all aspects of City administration and community life:land use,urban design,historic preservation, �.� '', 1,. �` economic development, housing, transportation, health, sustainability, infrastructure, public facili- .-4 "1 ties and services,international coordination,and Fort Bliss Army Base relations. Dover-Kohl leads a project team that includes Spikowski Planning Associates,Charlier Associates,Hall Planning and - yam. Engineering,Sottile and Sottile Architects,Chael,Cooper&Associates,Urban Advisors,Zimmerman/ At t' Volk Associates,IPS Group,Mind Mixer Web Solutions,CEA Group,W-ZHA Economics,UrbanAdvan- tage,Matrix Environmental,and The Street Plans Collaborative. h The Process The P/an E/Paso Comprehensive Plan process was interactive and bilingual,and included two three-week e charrettes in multiple areas throughout the city. During the charrettes,the team was able to talk to over 800 �.* studio visitors,meeting attendees,and hands-on participants.Over 20,000 people followed the project on its Neighborhood park website or took part in online conversations and polling in the project's virtual town hall. Newspaper,televi- +i. °,. - _ =< sion,and web coverage of the project was extensive. The project was used as a case study in the national .-- '. , - discussion on placemaking and city planning by the National Resource Defence Council. . ► . Pail Pr ;cp `‘...'. 1"_ Plan principles included developing multiple centers within the city,protecting the growing metropo- \ mss, ' lis'agricultural and natural landscapes,reclaiming marginal and abandoned areas near the heart of -:� the city as infill opportunities,creating a framework of transportation alternatives,utilizing historic yam.= preservation as an economic development tool,creating a range of open spaces throughout the city, i, ; ',„,__-"t y and coordinating transportation,recreation,public services,and community institutions to increase t ,- -,---:::-.7-/-'- y -- , the city's tax base hand-in-hand with an increased quality of life of residents. Plan principles form Arroyos used as public open space the basis of the multi-element Comprehensive Plan. Cities and neighborhoods are defined in large part -„ by the quantity and quality of their parks and open On March 6,2012,P/an E/Paso was adopted by unanimous vote of the El Paso City Council. The EPA spaces. The plan recommends public parks at all awarded P/an E/Paso a 2011 National Award for Smart Growth Excellence in Programs,Policies,and scales. A range of open space types is needed to Regulations.The EPA grants this award yearly to"recognize exceptional a pp roaches to development ment meet the City's diverse recreational,environmen- tal, and social needs. that respect the environment,foster economic vitality,and enhance quality of life." 2.6 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners A City Connected by Transit •f_ : �,,a,`' �'� -' �' '�' for The success of the RTS system will hinge on the y ` — ` EI Paso is part of a coordinated effort toward quality of urban spaces that surround the bus °. _3 � increasing transit ridership and stimulating stops and transfer stations. Transit-Oriented ;_` yam* 4, economic development in urban locations. The Development (TOD) is a design and develop- ,, �......„1.,:„._ 6f y Development strategy that links higher-density walk- City plans four Rapid Transit System (RTS)lines .,. '.:40 4t which will connect the primary vehicular corri- able neighborhoods to transit stations. TOD , dors,including the Mesa Corridor,the Dyer Cor- strengthens the urban fabric that surrounds '' 3� _, ridor, the Alameda Corridor, and the Montana public transportation with a mix of daily uses, � ± `- Corridor. A number of transfer stations have including housing,retail,and offices. This strat j recently been constructed,providing convenient, egy acknowledges that most transit riders begin / , sheltered transportation hubs. and end their trips as pedestrians,and that the O Remcon Circle Transfer Center streets around transit stations should be safe, The plan calls for new 60-foot buses, raised interesting, and convenient places to walk. platforms that will be level with the height of The team created illustrative plans for over 22 '""" the buses, and a ticketing system for riders to square miles of the City,focusing on TOD loco � ? their fares, allowing nicker entr onto �` prepay g q y tions to demonstrate pedestrian-friendly,mixed- , the buses. To cut travel time and increase ef- :;:*;,..:,.........- k,usedesign. , ficiency, rapid-transit stations will be placed about a mile apart along each corridor so there The plan anticipates that RTS will be the start of 7,: ., ,,,"4, _ else em. will be fewer stops for the buses. Plans also call amass-transit system that could one day include for traffic signal • prioritization,which would hold light rail and streetcars. It is the goal of the EI green lights longer if a bus was approaching an Paso City Council that EI Paso become one of the O Northgate Transfer Center intersection. least car-dependent cities in the southwest. /��/�� y / iiy %/ % �%/��%/% ,� - /a .�/ �� / � / �j --, \ A� �/ Tr: :.ate �_ = AIIIII�e y r am e ,y� - i �� , Glory Road Transfer Center --_ ,‘ ,-..,-- -,.,---__-- - - A=3" =- -2, - -,-- -41,..-_,W,-%--, -- -- -4_,,t. a....„,... . „,,,,____,,,,,,,,,,:e___ a_aa,,,,,_,,,,•._ _ ,..a______ , ,_„,,„_„:„..,,,,,„.;;„,a, 0,,,„_,,,; .:„...7, __ , , ....,,,___ ,„. , ,...‹.: -„,„,_ .t.-„,„„,,,,,,„,<___,..<„.. ., ., .,„>_,_,,,,,,, „.„ , _._____.,,,, ., I. ., , 4 9 , y © n j , /y „ Eastside Transit Terminal 4�6 /��/ jam /�i/---,----'%--'-----/% / // ,. � ' ��. F // / ----- - ---; -1;-- / /-- ice" +u _ '� id- // /// /, i%--- '.-.:,------ y i / // --, ,e-. yam /// �% � %, /; i�/� �� 40 s � ,- - E Mission Valley Transfer Center RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.7 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 ocoa Beach Gateways aster P n Cocoa Beach, FL Client: City of Cocoa Beach,FL iii �y Contact: Zachary P.Montgomery :::: i / � ," Development Services y Director City of Cocoa Beach (321)868-3297 -�� zmontgomery a cityofcocoabeach.com ;, ; + -- '11% Years: 2014 8, ' - -1. ' ., --S: For more information,visit doverkohl.com. , _ I;j1 L... , - - 4 1 , i': -- - `v, . — - g ,9th ` r The development of a vacant 8-acre parcel,along with the transformation of SR 520 into a multiway bou- ,„„�» `, levard establishes a destination along the Banana River and marks one of the major entrances to the City. f f The Project r -,.. .. , - - Cocoa Beach is emerging from a period of limited development and growth.The City hired Dover, Y° • >- _ Kohl&Partners,assisted by Spikowski Planning Associates,EPR,and Community Design Associates ° to help reverse this trend and encourage private investment to attract more visitors, businesses, x .a ' • �-. sales,and,ultimately,tax revenue.The City's Charter,Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code have intermingling development restrictions that resulted in decades of practically no development.The x" t _ x_,1. y plan includes suggested revisions of the most stringent regulations,permitting new growth. `f. � ( The •Gateways Master Plan is •comprised of three distinct study areas, each of which has under- tivit . The plan looks at ke utilized spaces that have the potential to become great centers of ac y e p a key x ,-.. , :"�, development areas and provides sample plans that create a sense of arrival at each of the northern �_!- entrances to the City. ,, ' The Process k . _ A five-day design charrette was held in January 2014 which brought together community members, J community leaders,elected officials,property owners,and the design team to work together toward a �� common vision for Cocoa Beach.The design team helped to establish local consensus and worked with y the community to see the potential that Cocoa Beach has to offer through hands-on design exercises. ` ' Forming a general consensus establishes a base for future public support which is often necessary to - erase roadblocks in the regulations and enable the desired types development.4 Status .. _,,- The plan was reviewed by Cocoa Beach Commissioners and was unanimously passed in June 2014. �'4 k �' �_ Changes to land development regulations and Comprehensive Plan are progress. 1 : ,>- .... 1 °� left Illustrative Plan ` , 4` ire 9„ ap,i " - r3 right SR 520 becomes a walkable destination .,. -- E�ens�ce' with street-oriented building fronting a multi-way boulevard. 2.8 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl St Partners Broadway - A Cocoa Beach Signature Public Space 0.41, 1 _____, ii i. —J / �' m I � "I 0 , 0 : / °,, -. # ti,:., -'T' 1 s vA s- 52o = - . 3L. 3r: _ 1i A I iii r j — i 4, i k 1 I �' The end of SR 520 between AlA and Ocean " �� % %'y' Beach Boulevard has the opportunity to becomes %%!�� % --.%0;-: a signature attraction in Cocoa Beach.The wid right-of-way is controlled by the City. �� Taking a closer look at the opportunity this �,oy%�� 0 �, ,�,�� Broadway area has to offer,this under-utilized - t space comes alive.The street should be formal- ��' ized with regularly spaced street trees,pedestri- ." an-scaled lighting and connected sidewalks that _ y - reemphasizes this grand entrance to Cocoa's ,° Beach greatest asset,the beach. `s 1 ; This public space will not be successful without "' P the addition of mixed-use street-oriented build- ings to line the street. The retailers and res- taurants encourage activity with street-facing xs storefronts and outdoor dining that take advan- tage of the comfortable space. Designed within the existing grassy median, The design for the eastern median section has � m the new space consists of three segmented a Splash Park and shaded benches for families. _ medians. The western segment is complete With slow design speeds that include on-street with benches to relax by the calm fountains and parking so that bicyclists will feel safe sharing - watch people as they pass by,enjoy their meals the road with vehicles, this new space will be under umbrella tables,or simply walk their dog calmer and quiet. The intersection of SR 520 in the grassy areas. At night, the pedestrian- and Ocean Beach Boulevard could be a curb- = scaled light posts, open and lighted shopfronts less,shared space.With the use of bollards to s and residences or hotel rooms above make the reinforce the separation of travel lanes and side- space a safe and interesting night out. walks, the intersection could become a special New pedestrian paseos designed in the north entry point to the beach.This will be an impor- tant amenity for Cocoa Beach. , and south blocks provide another layer of pedes- 1 €s f: trian connectivity and open up into small plazas j _ with fountains,visitors information gazebos and i �`� comfortable areas for transit users to wait.The �� - middle median is the meeting point between above:View looking east toward the Ocean down these pedestrian paseos. Outdoor casual seat- "Broadway" ing, restaurant tables and small restaurant ki- right View over Shepard Park looking back to- osks make the space vibrant day and night. wards"Broadway" RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.9 Dover,Kohl SE Partners February 26,2015 1 Bradenton Form-Based C Bradenton, FL Client: City of Bradenton,FL Contact: Timothy Polk,Director of Planning&Community Development =L City of Bradenton 941.932.9400 timothy.polk @cityofbradenton. com t� y �� 3 9 r' I fs Y Years: 2010-2011 i � M t,y . y y itr-....„.....N ,,,, , r, ."N.„._ ,,,,, 4 ';-: 4. " :" , r i 0;01 ...'''''1 (t I JbF ''''''y y/� s $ : New buildings are constructed in the parking lots From 2000 to 2009,the City of Bradenton embarked on a series of planning exercises that sought to that currently are a barrier to pedestrian connec- reverse a long decline of the downtown core and surrounding historic neighborhoods,and to protect tivity between Downtown and the Village of the Arts. Renderings are meant to show the develop- local industries such as citrus processing. In 2010, the City hired Dover, Kohl &Partners to lead ment potential under the form-based code. a public process,the goal of which was the creation of a form-based code implementing the com- munity's goals of revitalization,sustainability,and preservation of community character.While the � previous Euclidian-based zoning included regulations such as setbacks and buffers that promoted formulaic sprawl development, the form-based code includes metrics that were derived from the historic,walkable,city fabric in Bradenton.The form-based code unleashes development potential in the city by removing suburban parking ratios,making zero-foot setback developments legal,and w eliminating minimum lot-size requirements that kept parcels from being redeveloped. Unlike the pre- ` vious code,the form-based code includes designs for pedestrian-friendly,multi-modal thoroughfares, Architectural Standards that promote climate-responsive,authentic buildings,Landscape Standards ''' it that encourage habitat creation and local food production,and Sustainability topics such as dark-sky ' �� lighting, renewable energy generation, and low-imprint stormwater design. All regulations in the code are tied to the transect-based regulating plan. Karin Murphy Planning &Consulting,Inc.and An urban-format grocery store provides doors and Hall Planning and Engineering,Inc.collaborated with the creation of the form-based code. windows on the street,as well as a public plaza at its entrance. The Process During the hands-on design session,Dover Kohl&.Partners asked citizens and stakeholders to perform urban design surveys and measure parts of the city that embody the walkable,attractive,and enduring ',, '-f „., character of Bradenton.Next,Dover Kohl&Partners helped the citizens to use the metrics that they extracted in the first exercise to demonstrate how to repair eroded portions of the city,and propose ► _ infill and redevelopment.The drawings and documents that resulted became the basis for the content b'' �' of the form-based code.This exercise was an innovation to the usual charrette process. Rather than '4r 4°.,. '" merely visioning,the participants became acquainted with the"DNA"of their city and how to equate y good urban"DNA"with healthy urban fabric.Over the following months,drafts were reviewed by vari- s- , ,,-c . .�_, yy � ous City Departments,citizens,and stakeholders and the code was refined. the segment of 14th Avenue is added sited complete nt The City Council voted to adopt the Form-Based Code on June 8, 2011. The Code won the 2012 the grid of streets. New buildings are sited to front y p onto the new street segment. Driehaus Award for Form-Base Codes on May 10,2012. 2.10 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners A Transect-Based Regulating Plan e tfy s 1 r q y �� yx� Csrtr�5rj� i C 1 - z ce �i / �� s� � ��'� 4s�y e: � )' •/ -,,,,,,-2-- j % � o :aim �f ., . a ,,:s-/� ' _.. ■ •,,,,,,,. � mac, �� r sy � . I. r am' I J !J :' i I - - ;iiiii � �;y ��i g i j iT 1— ,..._ — ::1. -11,--,---.t .:.-f:-..-....„ im-_ � 4 �� e-' v � i i y -A r y �1/ 'mss /� '� .2�f LEGEND '-�� y % ii- i ._ � / 3 .:- rn `�.. .,. .., <. /��,, .,. % ,, t... /�,. .,.... ,sue ,,��..��.� i,. ,,. .". __ /_ : b.. -T5 ,„- .� 09- , �„a «s.ucxncrarimww.rn� • ...m..E.frmfn.m.u.eh T4-° r uu.n rcwarocaawOo.n rrr `t T.. 1,' k,',' ,.— ''"=-=',=.7.-47—'.-.--- nom.—'. —,o l3 T30 �I s ,� >>, ...• Weer / %s - �- - lei `,., 9U ° Y....�wq�. VWe ftheAlb §..„,:, �%# -� t T` /f "� '��, �' I.•Mili 1: ?:51:::::. - '4 .Q s., v x — T!ha r. .r . a R!,.--.3:7 deploys T6 just east - _ T�— of Old Main Street and the blocks surrounding 6 . % - . the historic rail station. This will preserve the - scale of the Main Street, which is compatible - _ , with heights suggested by T5, the zone found ',..;:,,,t, _ __--�. in the rest of downtown.The corridors are des- .� MCORP 10b4.0 COG[ ,4 wo.no.wrau1000N ..�–� wu..aw.w■.well ignated T4-0, which has shorter buildings than T5 but mixes uses more and has more spatial % 7 enclosure than T4-R or T3,the zones that consti- ' tute the residential fabric of the in town neigh- 4 %- = borhoods.Special Districts are assigned to two ' � major employment centers,including Tropicana, �� whose main processing plant is located in the y 'r_ - A*-. city and whose building envelopes and opera � i tions are deliberate exceptions to the metrics z1 , found in other transect zones. �� - Architectural Standards provide guidance on z the design of climate-responsive buildings that , are authentic to Bradenton. Photographs and - a -; diagrams,mostly of local buildings,illustrate the proper composition, details, and materials that contribute to aesthetics, durability, sustainabil- - ity, and resilience to hurricanes. Architectural , ., „ Standards and other Articles are transect-based Development potential was increased around the historic Downtown train station,a property that could and are tied to the Regulating Plan. be revitalized and returned to its original use should passenger rail service resume in the region. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.11 Dover,Kohl(Sr Partners February 26,2015 Jean Lafitte Resilience Jean Lafitte, LA ,1 r s S/y 1 / °' +try `s' �� -�' r 63 , A fishing market at Rosethom `�� ►: ; Park will allow local fisherman. to sell their catch directly to iv > -/_ =consumers and mark the ' entrance to Jean Lafitte..The �� " l - market stalls will,be organ 3f - "="----into small open air pavilions s y y connected pedestrian by-' j paths allowing visorsto< 3 i = �/ :and enjoy the while experiencing ng and sounds of baycKs commerce. Client: Center for Planning Excellence& T Project Town of Jean Lafitte,LA Jean Lafitte is an historic fishing community south of New Orleans, outside the current Contact: Camille Manning-Broome levee system.The community has been hit hard by flooding from natural disasters,made Senior vice President worse by the loss of bayou and higher flood waters due to the levee systems around Center for Planning Excellence New Orleans,and the BP oil spill in the Gulf.The Town of Jean Lafitte,working with the 225.389.7198 Center for Planning Excellence, set out to create a comprehensive resiliency plan that Camlle@cpex.org combines previous planning efforts and studies to create a roadmap to guide decisions Years: 2013 related to economic,social and physical resiliency. For more information,visit doverkohl.com j %� j�� A� �7 i� Working with local and economic consultants,Dover,Kohl&Partners held a public char- �� rette in the Town in November 2011. During the charrette, six principles for resilience —' i�—- ce '% % ��// /� j were developed: Assess Opportunities &Threats, Enhance Local Assets, Focus on the a Heart of Town, Diversify Mobility Options, Build Stronger&Safer,and Live with Water. With these elements a series of Town projects like the expansion of their boardwalk system through the Bayou,developing a nature center,adding a new dock and creating a fish market at Rosethorn Park for local fisherman to sell their catch, and enhancing the availability to their long history to help draw tourists were developed to show short term success giving confidence to the people in the town that they could still be there tomorrow. Status As a result of the outpouring of community participation and working with consultants . ' from the Army Corps of Engineers,Jean Lafitte's ring levee is included as part of phase 1 projects in the 2012 Coastal Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. The Jean Lafitte ItTomorrow Plan was unanimously adopted by the Town Council in April 2013. 2.12 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners "No community should deliberately set out to plan for less than its ideal." e o m e t own III1an —Dan Cary,Director of Planning,South Florida Water Management District S o ut h Miami, FL PROJECT DETAILS � � r Project Area: 378 acres t ,�% .'1 , Client: The City of South Miami —, ;„ , L `.,� South Miami Hometown,Inc. " Year Adopted: 1993 �y y �' For more information,visit doverkohl.com. - The 100% Model >• , .:::-:,,,-,-,-"- - or--4, 1 i 4 -,--�� , Sunset Drive:before and after reconstruction.The Metrorail station(not pictured)is located at the Dom Avenue,before entrance of this key mixed-use street. 4 . The Hometown Plan and the subsequent Hometown District Overlay Ordinance are examples of our •- work in traditional town centers. Starting in 1992,the study area became the subject of intensive public involvement to address the need for revitalizing the Main Street district along Sunset Drive in= the heart of the City of South Miami. Dover,Kohl&Partners assisted the City and the not-for-profit or- q tr ' ganization,South Miami Hometown,Inc.,with promoting redevelopment of the area,preparing a work program,conducting a charrette to design a detailed master plan,and rewriting the land development " regulations. This work reintroduced traditional town planning techniques in South Miami. The Master Plan includes transit-oriented development,protection for historic structures,and pedestrian improve- Dorn Avenue,after ments to the streets and commercial buildings. Samuel Poole III,Esq.,Peter M.Fernandez,PE,Clyde To show the potential for a better South Miami, Judson,AIA,Walter Kulash,PE,John Zeeger,PE,and the FAU/FIU Joint Center for Environmental& emphasis was placed on demonstration projects. Urban Problems also assisted in the creation of the Plan for South Miami. Neighbors, homebuyers, businesses, investors, and bankers needed their confidence restored. s , ; -_; The idea was to choose an area(however small) Dover,Kohl&Partners hosted an open planning process in 1992 to engage the community in shaping then totally transform it to create as dramatic and the Plan. The refrain from participants heard again and again was'we want our Main Street back.' visible an impact as possible.Instead of spending Thus the primary goal was to recognize the City's streets as crucial assets and to treat(and recon- precious funding across large areas,public funds struct)them as people-friendly public spaces.Other guiding principles were to nurture the downtown were initially concentrated on these areas. as a neighborhood in the making rather than as a collection of buildings-on-parking;and to create a - `A ry,:.-.:E\;- : 1-= mix of uses for Downtown, including residential,so that the area could prosper as an"identifiable • It produces a"postcard'outdoor whole".This idea meant that a district-wide approach to parking would need to be addressed for all environment of exceptional character, of Downtown.A diverse range of household incomes was also encouraged,which called for dignified exudes safety and optimism,and stands forms of affordable goal.A final oal was that the two sides of the City,divided by US1,should be out in contrast to blight. spatially and psychologically rejoined around the Metrorail transit station. • It combines adaptive re-use of existing and historic structures with new buildings and improved public spaces. r,� • It completes the public space;i.e.both The City of South Miami has adopted and continues to implement the Hometown Plan and Hometown sides of the street,all corners of an District Overlay Code.The initial"100%Model"project,the renovation of Dorn Avenue brought new intersection,or all sides of a green are life to one end of the downtown and precipitated numerous other building renovations and infill devel- built out or renovated. opment throughout the district.Substantial streetscape improvements along Sunset Drive included • It includes a significant residential wider sidewalks,reducing the number of travel lanes,and introducing traffic calming features;all of component,preferably owner-occupied. which have resulted in greater pedestrian activity. As a complement to the newly revitalized com- • It lures residents of moderate incomes; mercial activity along the City's main street,the City formed a Community Redevelopment Agency these'colonists'will demonstrate the (CRA)in 1998 to assist in revitalizing the area using the Hometown Plan as the underlying framework viability of close-in neighborhoods and of the official CRA plan. In 2008 a new municipal garage lined with restaurants opened,enhancing their discretionary income will help the district-wide,park-once plan for the Main Street district. support local businesses. • It suggests what the larger neighborhood &will eventually look like,inspiring private DOVER, KOHL LX PARTNERS investment. t o w n p l a n n i n g RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.13 Dover,Kohl dr Partners February 26,2015 Revising the Code to Fit the Vision , D ^ !_ .z ifs . i _ t s �X sF` A . � . a may,.., �i - , .. ,.,.mss sue--jam -; ample of urban infill along Sunset Drive that retains the historic character. The two-story 1 ill r i mixed-use building is backdrop to a historic , „_. _ plaza,with storefronts facing the street. New buildings along Sunset Drive are required to ,1 - - - be a minimum of two stories to better define the streetspace.The project was designed by '”' _; "` Chael,Cooper and Associates. "' , Starbucks Building,built under the Code , Updating the City's land development code was a necessary step in prompting and allowing the redevel- .,,, opment of downtown according to the community vision.In October 1993,the City Commission adopted i0 r ._ ' the Hometown District Overlay Ordinance.This form-based code is designed to be easy to use and = Ei, _ visual,with graphic illustrations rather than just text. 3 .,3 ,;-S Sr "i"g is a new three- The code opened the door to revitalization; numerous new street-oriented buildings have been con- story, mixed-use infill project located directly structed following the code's standards,with each addition positively enhancing the walkable,pedestri- across US1 from the South Miami Metrorail an-oriented character of South Miami.Key code innovations include: station. Its design was made possible by the Rev e,,J H ,-�� = _:3 shared parking and transit proximity parking The code revamped parking requirements to reflect a Main Street,pedestrian-oriented vision.The old reduction provisions in the Hometown Plan Dis- parking requirements were typical for strip shopping centers or suburban office complexes,resulting in trict Overlay Code. The project was designed building heights being limited to one story.The revised parking rules contain incentives for multi-story, by the affiliated firms of Dover,Kohl&Partners mixed-use buildings.If developers combine residential units,retail and office uses in a single building, and Chael,Cooper and Associates. the total required parking can be reduced by 45%or more,and on-street parking spaces may count , toward the requirement for adjacent buildings. !�ncr as.ai „{ ., ti ^... 1r,_ _ _1. :L.-_,L-loci- iD'n, ci aC '.�/ ._i _ -- As Second,the Hometown Ordinance established flexibility on the land uses permitted by the code.On •� 4 most streets,all of the uses permitted in the district(including many types of retail,office and residen- 1� ; tt� � 1 'They want to create a downtown in the heart of the sprawl,turning the Ice worst of suburbia into the best of the Downtown endall New Urbanism." —Florida Trend Building a Downtown around Transit PROJECT DETAILS cL Y-' ` N ""° y ia:,:‘,, -,,,!- .7 -----_-_-_-- x, 10 -,, , ----, --_ . .- - , -_, f._, ,,,,, __,,,... i .,.._ - , Project Area 324 acres . Chamber South, 4 i ,i _ . , .. ` _a ._ .-# -P-,�.. .t t_. Client: South Miami,FL ._.. ` >'� Year Adopted: 1999 ! --e . f *� ,� a Website: chambersouth.com/index. _ y php.submenu=community& ✓ „. ' f p src=gendocs&Iink=Downto ;, - ;-'2 - A wn%20Kendall&category= u 'f j � Community 2 1St For more information,visit doverkohl.com. . won i r f;rt: µ : ,� /e Y yi�l�. i y O s 5 INMINTOWN- /i/ : 1-1-_-1-'1 -, �� r,' y 9i 3 a,,-----'7""--;----4-ft,...72-:-.4-.:1.-t7=---41-'-‘7"--L•1:4;:::57.:,-,r-'”-%.-1=1,__ _,,___,_ ' '',‘,#.54,,e6517," , : - '- :. - , -A Town Square:The heart of the new Kendall com _ -�, ;� munity, overlooked by multi-story mixed-use and "` ' :rr , � civic buildings. it • .▪ -�---- Jr..° The Project �� The Master Plan and Overlay Code for Downtown Kendall is the product o a June 1998 charrette to ;: plan a high density transit-oriented development in Miami-Dade County.The study area contains a =: - 1 ': 1 virtually ideal convergence of the Metrorail transit corridor and four heavily traveled regional road- P t w• ays that crisscross a high intensity of retail,office,hotels,and nearby residential neighborhoods. The study area has experienced remarkably fast growth,but poor pedestrian accessibility and visual 11= blight are prominent in Downtown Kendall,as in most such auto-oriented suburbs. The new future r e• nvisioned for Downtown Kendall is as a dense,vibrant,mixed-use and transit-oriented urban center for the region. Residential Square: Rowhouses and an urban Approach apartment building create a safe edge to a neigh- The design team conducted a seven day charrette in June 1998,soliciting input from community mem- borhood park. bers, business owners, elected officials, and technical experts. The resulting plan allows any num- ber of developers to realize projects within the patchwork of individual properties,with each property _ i01 ' contributing to a unified whole. A form-based code accompanies the Master Plan to ensure that new projects are consistent with the vision for Downtown Kendall,which is for it to become a model for 1 - N ' transit-oriented development.At the forefront is an architecturally varied cityscape designed around . 44.i the pedestrian rather than the automobile. . ' Status. 1' . -e: .• li f I .n i.35w. ' t it t t - t The Master Plan was approved by the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners in 1998 and the - _ code was adopted in December of 1999.This new ordinance replaces the existing zoning districts to form a new zoning district in the Miami-Dade County Zoning Code. The Downtown Kendall project has , ,,�, ,, been featured in Florida Trend,on NBC 6 and WPBT reports,and in a special issue of Business Week, Shops and restaurants occupy the ground floor "21 Ideas for the 21st Century." Construction on several sites is complete and more than 3200 new along the main street. dwelling units in mixed-use settings have been approved. DOVER, KOHL PARTNERS t own p l a n n i n g RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.15 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Change over Time Kendall Drive was a nar- t... `�- z-z---,--,..„--. row country road and Dadeland Mall's first build- , -,,„ ;_+ , � :_, =_- :_, , ,.. ings were sprouting at the rural edge of a young f*t t -_- , metropolis. Today this location is embedded in ' � : . .. �ti $�� the suburban growth that followed, closer to � t ,.i" 'Irk � � ,_ -.`:°� s �� ;�,-., Downtown Miami and the coastal edge than to x *. —4 p " -� may; J' '- the western or southern reaches of metropolitan 1,- ,� ► , t� development. The region's recent commitment ' y of re-directing growth away from rural areas and - - back to the transportation corridors of the ear- �" ' ` - - `4 liest settlements is slowly taking form with the 3 first building projects heeding the visionary call . of Eastward,Ho! The Downtown Kendall plan is a response to this vision. Mixed-use buildings will _ A, N , front upon a network of interconnected streets, �' parking garages will be placed mid-block to re- , - place the vast expanses of surface parking,and - transit is being re-integrated into the area. "When fully built out—probably in two or three decades—downtown Kendall's Downtown Kendall,2034 Aerial View:Interconnected streets,mixed-use development,and mid-block population will be double the current parking transform the auto-oriented landscape. size of Opa-locka,county planners esti- �� mate,with most residents living within i walking distance of the Metrorail line. j In contrast, the US Census in 2000 re- 4 3 fl ported 3,800 residents in the eastern ! w` portion of Kendall, an unincorporated portion of Miami-Dade County." ' - Frank Norton,Miami Today _—,a - .. , 4 ii-,iii i. <-p--� "_ - d - .. Dadeland Boulevard:Before ' t.: to 0y9 Snapper Creek Canal:Before = - f' -7. I A .., T fo�r x � pt. v im„ � A new Snapper Creek Canal, with pedestrian The proposed Dadeland Boulevard will be centered around the pedestrian,with colonnades designed bridges,wide sidewalks,shade trees and mixed- to protect people from the elements,building facades that face the street,and on-street parking to use buildings. slow traffic. 2.16 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners RETP I N NEW'FIRM PROFILE Founded in Miami Beach in 2009,Street Plans is an internationally recognized planning,design, and research practice with offices in Miami, New York City, and San Francisco. The firm has a strong track record with working collaboratively with clients to integrate active transportation with land use urban design, and comprehensive planning projects. Our capabilities have been solicited for small and large-scale projects across the country, including New York City Bike y , Share, the City of Miami 2030 Bicycle Plan, the multi-modal Pinecrest U.S.1 Corridor Mobility f g Plan, and Plan El Paso, the winner of the Environmental Protection Agency's 2011 National Award for Smart Growth. Street Plans is currently working on multimodal transportation projects in New York City, Coral Gables, Miami Beach, Freeport, Boston, and Little Havana. While the work has varied in scale and scope, our company has consistently applied our knowledge of smart growth principles to Street Plans Coral Gables Office coordinate transportation design with existing and desired built context. Coral Gables,FL Our company places a high value on research and best practice dissemination. Publications authored by Principals Tony Garcia and Mike Lydon include The Smart Growth Manual, The Open Streets Project Guide, and Tactical Urbanism Volumes 1-4. Tony and Mike recently finished writing a full-length book about Tactical Urbanism, to be published by Island Press in the spring of 2015. OUR WORK PUBLIC OUTREACH • Public Engagement and Community Outreach • Interactive Trainings and Workshops • Livable Streets Initiatives Planning, Marketing, PR, and Implementation • Urban Quality Analysis • Research and Writing • Project Implementation Services URBAN PLANNING + ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN • Tactical Urbanism / Placemaking / Demonstration Projects • Corridor/Community/Regional Master plans • Comprehensive Plan Amendments& policies • Land Use/Zoning Code Analysis • Zoning Applications • Charrette Planning and Design Support • Development Standards • Building Type Development • Street Design Standards • Architectural Standards TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plans • Pedestrian Master Plans • Transit Oriented Development Planning + Design • Complete Streets Designs • Bicycle Parking Analysis • Transit policy development (including federal, state and local policy) • Safe Routes To Schools Plans • Greenway and Shared Use Path Plans • Bikeway Network Audits/ Handlebar Survey • Walkability Audits • SmartCode Bicycle Module Calibration RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.17 Dover,Kohl Sr Partners February 26,2015 PLAN EL PASO, EL PASO, TX Agency Name: City Development and Planning Contact: Carlos Gallinar, Planning Deputy Director El Paso, TX City of El Paso, TX Proposed Bicycle Network 300 N. Campbell I El Paso, Texas 79901 915.541.46621 j gallinarrc @elpasotexas.gov � Time Frame: 2012 „s iy��' Type: Comprehensive Plan/Form-Based Code � .� Size: 250 square miles � � ti _ Status: Plan Adopted, Implementation Underway , .„.V 4 .; Awards: Environmental Protection Agency National Award Z for Smart Growth Achievement (201 1) $ -, 46%V,, ,' Street Plans contributed to a multi-phase comprehensives 1i T/A °4 «` ,rte g 3 c,3 s= planning effort for the City of El Paso, Texas, as it seeks to ;, ;� �r� �-_ update its Comprehensive Plan and vision for a variety of multi modal transportation projects. In collaboration with Dover ` _?� Kohl and Partners, Street Plans joined the charrette team for the first phase of the three-phase project to help calibrate the . KEYS :` SmartCode for select Transit Oriented Development Areas NM °”' '"` surrounding the existing and proposed Bus Rapid Transit m haddn Mwe bin SY.b P.. stations. Street Plans also helped the Charrette team formulate a vision for each TOD site, contributing to infill master plans produced substantially at the first visioning charrette. These plans included implementing a multi-modal vision intended to guide future municipal investment in not just transit, but an El Paso,TX increase in bicycle and pedestrian mode share. BRT Transfer Station Bicycle Sheds , As an ongoing process, Street Plans continues to contribute significantly to the public outreach effort as the firm in charge of designing and managing the project website. Designed to be the first point of contact for most stakeholders, Street Plans integrated a collaborative online mapping tool that allows the , project team to efficiently collect and analyze public comments. ...-f This interactive web tool has quickly become the primary means of communication between the project team and the public-at-large. c.�,, -h s E The second and third project phase, currently underway, �, � - include a city-wide bicycle atlas and SmartCode Bicycle ttr - Module calibration, to be completed by The Street Plans ; ÷—■ Collaborative. Street Plans will also continue to focus on smart KEy P _ growth and transit-oriented infill policies designed to support s... .. hM Cn Mowtonc Stag P. the City's multi-modal transportation expansion vision. �.eP.� 2.18 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners BIKE-WALK MIAMI BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Agency Name: City of Miami Beach Transportation Department Contact:Jose R. Gonzales, P.E. y 1700 Convention Center Drive) j Miami Beach, FL 33139 The " n_ _�t Survey 305.673.7000 x676811 josegonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov - Miami Beach - Time Frame: In Progress An Assessment of Bicycling Conditions for: Type: Multi-modal mobility plan The Atlantic Greenway Network Plan Update Size: Citywide (91,000 population, 18 sq. miles) Miami Beach, Florida Status: Phase 1 Complete, Phase 2 nearly complete 6/5/12-6/9/12 Street Plans was hired by the City of Miami Beach to re-imagine its transportation network. Working with Atkins North America, Street Plans launched Bike-Walk Miami Beach, a multi-phase project that envisions a gC,>> holistic and comprehensive redesign of the Miami Beach street network to re-balance transportation priorities and take into account the concerns of pedestrians, cyclists, tree canopy advocates, and neighborhood Street Plans biked around each street in the city to associations alike. The project builds on previous mobility, bicycle, understand the existing conditions. pedestrian, and traffic safety studies to inform the best methods for integrating active transportation modes into the network. The project started in June 2012 with two kickoff bicycle summits, where community residents were introduced to the planning team, and heard a - lecture on the latest best practices in transportation planning from Street s "n Plans. In addition to the Bicycle Summits, Street Plans designed and " built a project website that further augmented the public participation process. Following the initial meetings, the project team documented • existing conditions, leveraging Street Plans' innovative handlebar survey process, and meeting with community residents. The project website served an important role in the public involvement program for this project. Rather than a static website with basic project information, Street Plans included interactive web-based map The Street Plans handlebar survey involves going applications to get real time data from residents, as well as a full best out with community groups and experiencing the practice guide to bicycle/pedestrian planning. This interactive website streets firsthand. supported in-person public involvement efforts, including numerous community workshops. Street Plans is now in the process of developing the final plan for this project. The plan includes a robust existing conditions analysis, and detailed section and plan-view drawings to illustrate project recommendations. The plan makes recommendations for policies and programs, and provides detailed guidance on implementation. A Street Design Guideline insert will support the implementation section of the final plan. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.19 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 CORAL GABLES BICYCLE AND . �., ;; y PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN N Agency Name: City of Coral Gables Contact: Sonia Succar, Environmental Analyst = City of Coral Gables 2800 S.W. 72nd Avenue I I Miami, FL 33155 SSuccar @coralgables.com I 1 305.720.1659 Time Frame: Spring -Fall 2013 Type: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans. Size: Citywide (49,000 population, 37 sq. miles) Status: Complete Though it is not known for its bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure, in 2010 /, y the Coral Gables City Commission took the historic decision to invest $400,000 in the expansion of bicycle facilities around the city. At that ;' time, the city also embarked on an ambitious public works campaign to repave city streets and implement traffic calming projects around the city. Creating a shared path around the university was a main recommendation of the report and is being Regionally, the city is a linchpin between the City of Miami to the north implemented. and east and the rest of the county to the west. As the number of residents in the city increases it is natural that the city seek to improve transportation choices in line with national best practices. Almost 20% of the residents and visitors to the city on a daily basis are on foot or bike. As such the primary purpose of this study is to identify the < projects that can be implemented with the initial $400,000 investment in `'r ' the short term, while also identifying bicycle and pedestrian investments .. .,,; that can be made in the years ahead. For this initial investment, this study A recommended the implementation of a bike lane along the most heavily used route in the city, from Salzedo in the downtown core, to University Drive, straight to the University of Miami Campus. Another main recommendation of the report are safe and convenient Another recommendation was the creation of a connections to the M-Path. The 9 Mile M-Path runs through the heart of Greenway around the Coral Gables golf course. Coral Gables and is a major regional bicycle and pedestrian facility. ...._. I----- --%%i%% -iii i a- i/ :-4-/% ; ✓ - y %/f �l ft ':: !� f .-- �� ' It 'I i' --- ,- o' - ..,--,,,-;-,--: _ 1 III g --- k.,A" 3 1' :, Amor }c,l'3,1' 1! t'1 c"q A1('al i - 3 .n t t { tt .3'.,.�.. 33 mss, f n, ■ 't _1, / .....i 1 0 1. s.--' .....:., � `° ,� •a rartra-ar,irar-arar`er.r.r,ru--.rr*-_-_- - . 2.20 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners TOWN OF FREEPORT, MAINE / ACTIVE LIVING PLAN '/ Agency Name: Freeport Town Council, Active Living Task Force Contact: Anne-Marie Davee „ - y Chair, Active Living committee g %ice, Freeport, ME rdavee17@comcast.net I 1 207.841.1300 Time Frame: 2013 2014 . Type: Active Living Plan 9 an Size: 46 Square Miles � Status: Accepted by the Freeport Town Council The Freeport Town Council undertook the Active Living Plan -- as part of its ongoing efforts to improve the quality of life for Freeport's residents. Street Plans was retained to work with the �. — Active Living Task Force appointed by the Council to develop 0 the plan. // The plan established a roadmap for effectively integrating physical activity into Freeport's social and physical fabric, allowing both residents and visitors to easily build physical FREEPORT, MAINE activity into their daily routines.As part of the Active Living PROPOSED ON-STREET BIKEWAYS Plan process, Street Plans conducted an analysis of existing conditions (which included a Handlebar Survey of bike infrastructure in the town) and hosted two public forums which attracted more than 100 total participants. Street Plans also worked with the Active Living Plan Task Force to conduct a survey about active living, which was completed by over 700 =. people. The Active Living Plan recommendations were organized around 3` six areas of focus: Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Equity, r ' ,-- q ty, and Evaluation. The plan included many r �� ,.� town-wide recommendations, but also focused in on eight F° "activity centers" which emerged from the planning process. The activity centers included Downtown Freeport, the South Freeport Village neighborhood, and many local recreational ;'+ facilities for sports or trail-based activities. In these focus areas, v4 y � - the plan outlined strategies to connect and enhance Freeport's i !�� i� j/ current active living assets. In total, the plan presented 88 /�� i� projects to improve active living opportunities in Freeport in the Legend-ProposedBikeways short and long-term. �-i ■.a•us•r:r•R+art tsu?m) ■::Si c rtl•�a _/�� _->_,, ■£ast Graat 3rannwry After reviewing a draft document, the Town Council formally III>aaaa U.Se Path accepted the Active Living Plan on July 15, 2014. Later that �'", ` MOW MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM 4' month, the Town Planning Board determined that the plan was consistent with the Freeport's Comprehensive Plan as well. Implementation of several short-term projects identified in the Plan are already underway. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.21 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 MIAMI, FL 2030 BICYCLE MASTEP PLAN CITY Agency Name: City of Miami 2030 BICYCLE 0NETWORK PLAN Contact: Collin Worth, Bicycle Coordinator Et City of Miami -Capital Improvements Program alma; 444 SW 2 Avenue- 8th Floor I I Miami, Florida 33130 `i°'' 1!Eir cworth @miamigov.com 11 305.562.1124 t 1 ?Lii{i k Time Frame: 2009-2010tt 1 Type: Bicycle Master Plan Citywide (417,000 population, 55 sq. miles) / - e�.t;i ` 111 Status: Plan Complete Implementation Underway �� =' '- '", Building from previous advocacy and planning efforts with the City 1. of Miami, Street Plans was hired in 2009 to complete the city's first 1=--- _ > ,'... comprehensive bicycle master plan. .7: i .e� With a goal of putting a bikeway within a 1/4 mile of every Miami �"`. ' residents, the ambitious 20-year master plan expands a baseline of 15 disconnected miles of existing bicycle facilities to a network of more ,�� g Y the Plan introduces five new than 280 miles. To make This happen, bikeway types, includes a full network of bicycle boulevards. The Plan -% YtYP � y �/j �� jj �� also recommended 3,000 new parking spaces alon with arkin --;- � P g P g P g // type and placement guidance. Structured on the League of American ��, LI Bicyclists' 6 E's, The 2030 Plan also includes extensive education, evaluation, and encouragement program recommendations. ; Today, the Miami Bicycle Master Plan continues to guide infrastructure �� investments in the City of Miami. Early success includes the implementation of miles of new bicycle lanes, the application of the City's first Shared Use Lane Markings (sharrows), the adoption ��, of a Complete Streets policy, the continuation of Bike Miami Days, � � a new mountain bike course, and a safety awareness cam ai n � �tY P g �demonstrating the benefits of bicycling. ��:,:: y ,,, r r: In 2008 the City of Miami was ranked by Bicycling Magazine as one of the top three worst cities for bicycling in the nation, but by 2010, --- \ ak ,--- Miami was removed from Bicycling Magazine's top three worst list , ,,k- w c.:'''" t ' and added to the top 50 list (#44). It also received a Bicycle-Friendly Community Honorable Mention in 2011. In 2012, the City climbed in the rankings to#34 and was awarded with a BFC Bronze designation. Implementation of the Street Plans authored plan has been a primary cause of this improvement. 2.22 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ARCAD1S Infrastructure, environment, buildings Imagine the result WATER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS & SEA LEVEL RISE ARCADIS is the leading global natural and built asset design and consultancy firm working in partnership with our clients to deliver exceptional and sustainable outcomes through the application of design, consultancy, engineering, project and management services. ARCADIS differentiates through its talented and passionate people and its unique combination of capabilities covering the whole asset life cycle, its deep market sector insights and its ability to integrate health & safety and sustainability into the design and delivery of solutions across the globe. We are 28,000 people who generate$3.8 billion in revenues.We support UN-Habitat with knowledge and expertise to improve the quality of life in rapidly growing cities around the world. Client San Francisco Bay Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for San Francisco Conservation and Bay: Development of a decision support tool to assist Development Commission Bay Area Metropolitan decision makers with shoreline adaptation planning Transportation Commission San Francisco. CA Contact San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission The shoreline of San Francisco Bay is extremely vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise. Will Travis Approximately $64 billion in property value on 240 square miles of Bay shoreline is at risk of Executive Director significant flooding. travis @bcdc.ca.gov ARCADIS is assisting Bay area agencies in assessing risks and developing adaptation 415.352.3653 strategies. We developed a decision support tool for planners and decision makers to develop their own shoreline adaptation strategies. ARCADIS led a team that also included U.S. and Start Date Dutch engineers and scientists to investigate sea level rise impacts on the shoreline of San 2012 Francisco Bay and develop appropriate strategies for adaptation. This study was the first ever project of an alliance between the Netherlands and California on climate change adaptation. Completion Date 2012 Major components of the study were: • Hydrodynamic modeling, using Delft 3D, to assess the impact on wave climate, tidal Key ARCADIS Staff activity and flow fluxes under different sea level rise scenarios. Piet Dircke John Atkinson • A comparison of institutional arrangements in the Netherlands and California, including Hugh Roberts a SWOT-analysis, to determine if government in its current setting is capable of properly addressing and implementing climate change adaptation strategies. • The development of a decision support matrix from which a climate change adaptation strategy is derived, based on economic and natural system dynamics. These strategies range from tidal denying, ecology driven, and economy driven, to tidal embracing development, depending on the type of shoreline and future ambitions. The strategies are complemented by a suite of over 50 different adaptation measures. ARCADIS has just begun a follow-up assignment to assess the sea-level-rise vulnerability of Bay Area transportation infrastructure. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.23 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 ARCAD1S Infrastructure, environment, buildings Imagine the result Client NYC Economic Development Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency (HS Task Force) Corporation Various Locations, NY Contact Dan Zarrilli 110 William Street New York,NY 10038 ARCADIS evaluated various storm surge mitigation alternatives in the New York Harbor. A 212.312.3774 variety of approaches was presented including engineered structures like sea walls, levees, and storm surge barriers, and building with nature measures like dune restoration, beach Start Date nourishment, and wetlands restoration. Dune restoration along the Rockaways was one of the 2013 interventions closely analyzed, both with regards to the merits of storm surge, wave and sea level rise mitigation along the Atlantic coast and as part of a larger system of multiple-lines-of- Completion Date defense protecting the broader region including communities surrounding Jamaica Bay. 2013 The ARCADIS team completed the conceptual design and cost estimation for harbor-wide Key ARCADIS Staff and local barriers, as well as numerical modeling and analysis associated with protective John Atkinson value quantification of projects studied in the NY Harbor and waterfronts throughout Lower Hugh Roberts Manhattan, Staten Island, South Queens(Rockaway), South Brooklyn (Coney Island) and the Shan Zou Brooklyn and Queens East River waterfront. Protective solutions in South Brooklyn and South Anwar Zahid Queens included local barriers, dunes, breakwaters, marsh restoration, channel shallowing, Robert Daoust seawalls and levees. The models simulated storm surge inundation and wave action for a range of conditions • including consideration of Hurricane Sandy and other theoretical storms, high tide and sea level rise as far into the future as 2050. Water surface elevation, wave height, wave period, wave direction and current speed and direction were analyzed. The Result The ADCIRC and SWAN models can provide regional storm surge elevation and wave conditions data for locations throughout the NYC region for the purposes of planning and design. Key results of the study include: • Analysis of flood risk at key locations within NYC • Identification of potential flood mitigation solutions • Modeling to determine optimal flood risk reduction capacity considering revised FEMA flood recurrence intervals and sea level rise • Determination of preferred alternatives for each key location -1 • „,” `• ss�4 2.24 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl Sr Partners Goocidncon@uBling Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries Goodkin Research is a Florida Corporation (DBA"Goodkin Consulting") doing "Lewis Goodkin brings business in Florida since 1977. Originally located in Lauderdale by the Sea, a deep understanding Goodkin moved to Miami in 1991. The company is owned by Lewis Goodkin of the key issues facing and currently has one other principal,Jack Winston,who shares in the manage- the real estate industry, ment, decision-making process and profits. as well as enormous Goodkin has acted as the real estate consulting arm of the Miami-based office experience in providing of Arthur Andersen LLP(1991-1994) and then formed a strategic alliance with advisory services to PricewaterhouseCoopers as real estate advisor and consultant to many of the real estate developers, firm's clients(1994-2006). builders, investors and To enhance our resources and provide additional advisory services to cli- lenders." ents, Goodkin Consulting has a joint services alliance with the Strategic Development Planning Group of URS Corporation (NYSE: URS), one of the _ Nick Cammarano, Managing world's largest engineering design firms. URS specializes in economic devel- Partner,PricewaterhouseCoopers Real opment and market strategies for large developers, local governments and public/private ventures integrated project services,from front-end planning to Estate Industry Services Group final construction. Headquartered in San Francisco, URS operates in more than 20 countries with approximately 27,000 employees. Serving Private, Public Clients In Every Aspect Of Real Estate Goodkin Consulting conducts market research in virtually every aspect of the -I real estate industry–then translates this information into a recommended plan j of action with highly specific suggestions designed to maximize market success. { We have conducted studies throughout the U.S.as well as Canada, Mexico,the Caribbean,South America and Europe.In every engagement,our firm develops a customized package of services designed to meet a clients specific requirements. i M Public Sector Projects , Our firm works closely with public-sector clients from California to Florida, ,. existing community redevelopment agencies,downtown development authori- ties,special taxing districts and elected officials throughout the conceptualiza- tion and planning process. '"''"'' Our firm's wide experience and breadth of knowledge in related-use,multifam- ily residential, office, retail and industrial projects allows us to provide analysis and recommendations grounded in the realities of the local marketplace. For instance,we can advise on whether the market will respond to a particular use "The advice provided by planned for a community revitalization project – with specific recommenda- Lew Goodkin to our firm tions for that type of product. has been exceptional. We also help shape effective public-private partnerships that accomplish civic It is analytically based, goals while meeting the private sector's financial requirements. practical and financially sound. Lew has always Mixed-Use Developments demonstrated the high- A well-crafted mixed-use development can become a highly successful project within its local marketplace, with a blended appeal to different types of end est professional st a n- users. However, each separate element of these complex multi-use projects d and S in all the work he If must be carefully examined to ensure its viability.We help both private devel- has done for us. opers and public-sector clients determine the proper mix of uses,overall com- patibility, pricing and phasing strategies for their mixed-use projects. — Evan M. Marks, President, George Sords Realty, Inc. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.25 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 GoOddn©©nOUEOcng Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries University of Miami Nova Southeastern University The University of Miami (UM) has formed a separate In February 2005, we began working with Nova entity to manage its entire real estate inventory as well as Southeastern University(Nova)in preparing a study which the development of new real estate.The company formed would help the client determine the potential for current was the Miami Asset Management Company (MAMCO). and future development of its long-range plans for its Goodkin Consulting was selected as the market advisor proposed"University Village." and in that role completed assignments such as: Our study focused on a proposed development of: • Market research studies that lead to the proposed • Retail—189,200 square feet development of UM South, an 1,200-unit master • Residential—495 units planned Traditional Neighborhood Designed (TND) • Office—788,000 square feet community with a Town Center consisting of 60,000 • Parking—3,524 cars square feet of retail, 40,000 square feet of office, a • Hotel—300 rooms public library, a public magnet high school and 400 During the nine-month study period, we continuously rental apartments. We worked with the planners in worked hand-in-hand with the joint venture developer,the formulating the master plan and continuously con- architect, and the university administration. Based on our suited with MAMCO on negotiations with perspective presentation,and as stated in our proposal,"Primary objec- developers and joint venture partners.We developed tives of the research and analyses required the definition of an economic impact study for the University to help the competitive positioning of the proposed development value the real estate. among area rental,retail and hotel products,and the evalu- • A market study and development proposal for the ation of its potential performance in terms of absorption/ Smathers Estate, a 35-acre tract that was left to the occupancy,and achievable rent prices."The required anal- university. We formulated a unique residential pro- yses also involved special emphasis on profiling demand in posal for single-family homes to be sold exclusively to the area in terms of area characteristics,competitive hous- UM faculty and administrators. ing cost sensitivity,and retail and hotel demand. • We worked with MAMCO's management as consul- tants for the long-term ground lease for a site(owned Contact:Nova Southeastern University George L.Hanbury by UM) across Red Road just west of the university II, Ph.D., Executive Vice President Nova Southeastern campus to be developed as market rate rental hous- University 3301 College Avenue Ft.Lauderdale,FL 33314- ing within the City of South Miami. 7796 (954) 262-7300 Contact: University of Miami Mike Katz, President MAMCO 11511 S.W. 57th Avenue Pinecrest, FL 33156 (305) 668-9422 2.26 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl St Partners Goodldnc®n @aft[ Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries Royal Palm Village BioTech Research Park Homestead AFB ReUse Plan This project is in the Village which is a municipality in Palm This study was prepared for the Miami-Dade County Beach County. The assignment was concerning its assets Commission as a requirement by the Department of and long-range development objectives. Defense before any transfer of government property could The stated objective by the Village is a "redevelopment be finalized. The property in question was 717 acres of plan envisioned to include academic, research and busi- the existing 2,937 acres which make up the Air Force Base ness opportunities." As consultants, our objective is to (1,853 acres would remain for the Air Base's operations.) support that desire with a professional level of research, With this report—in conjunction with the many meetings using proven techniques,historical perspectives,anecdot- with the Air Force,the Department of the Interior and the al experiences, and quantitative methods to establish the National Park Commission —we acted as the representa- level of demand for the above mentioned uses. Our goal tive of the future owner and estimated the future value of and objective is to ensure that the Village has a successful this real estate asset for the County Commission. project,and the key to achieving that objective is the real- ity of the depth of the demand within the market, which we hope to quantify through our research and analysis. Contact: Homestead AFB ReUse Bill Johnson (former Assistant County Manager) Director, Port of Miami (305) 347-4844 Contact: Village of Royal Palm Beach Ken Tuma, Project Representative UDK Studios(561) 366-1100 Port Everglades We were retained by both the Broward County Commission and the Port Everglades Authority to develop a long- range plan for the acquisition of all the adjacent land to the existing port. The plan involved uses, values, and financing options. The plan and concept was approved and the bonding was secured and the lands acquired. Contact: Jack Osterholt Deputy City Mayor Miami-Dade County(305) 375-5695 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.27 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 N11111111.41/' �r,;ki,,+. ' 3� :„7°.°nr r v ,t`l`.;t,-:4�-„ °!rs h h >k,i. far .a',�k•x'd t:t 4 y`X�!„'."•,`;. ;4 t44 u�:,?zJ'°+*$�,k"��,",Y:�� " ge'l jT M r�z tE,;Wra ai, V.' ,,,,:r�� :, S�ry o'' 4 7 S? ^�. MY r ,e 3P� n 't.1..d�F w .,i h. " y,J '� tl . § YT, r s ip a ' , w p iiiiIMP‘ '-' .;;. l Business Description JSK ARCHITECTURAL GROUP is a full service company 4- s d `-, " * offering comprehensive Architectural, Engineering, F ` Historic Preservation, and Urban Infill Design Services • ' 1 : / - ' ,AO' for a wide variety of building types. JSK has been 1 . ,-: �— in business since 1989. Our mission is to provide '' `x$ excellence designing people's places to enhance their �•6ss —yam. i P ) ' • `y. - lifestyle by listening to their needs and emotions while ■ ` / .'''' . ' ' being sensitive to their budgets. 3 ' 4 � z� � ; JSK ARCHITECTURAL GROUP aims to provide design that uplifts the spirit and enhances the urban environment every time, all the time. With this intent our clients can depend on quality, function, and . -4 enduring design. We believe in technical solutions to j'. . ,4 difficult problems and stylish solutions to any problem, Business History ...`.tee`-._.°• ,.---- _ � t ' s , -'- JSK Architectural Group is based in Miami-Dade with �; branches in Broward County. Our team is experienced - in historic preservation; we bring with us the required } expertise. Y `- ..i r ;:, Organization of Firm 1. Legal Name and Address: JSK International, Inc. DBA JSK Architectural Group Coral Gables, FL 33134 t ' -'---,,,--..:.- 2. Type of Organization: Corporation Date of Incorporation: 09/20/1982 , State of Incorporation: Florida } 3. Principal Officers: Jorge S. Kuperman AIA President t : �� Ellen Uguccioni Vice President • °', 4. The length of time in business: 32 years 4 a 2.28 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners IIIIIIIIII. • IIIIIMPIN RELEVANT PROJECT' Opa Locka City Hall Project Desicription Rehabilitation Historic Preservation Architect The Opa Locka Old City Hall is a building registered in the National Archive of Historic Places and therefore its conservation or alterations falls Agency Name: under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Interior, National Park City of Opa Locka Service. The scope of work of this project was to produce a complete report for the rehabilitation of the Old City Hall.JSK Architectural Group Agency Contact: took the responsibility of acting as the Historic Architect to provide a Kelvin Baker complete assessment of the existing conditions in order to create a set of City Manager recommendations that would take into consideration the applicability of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historical Contact Telephone& E-mail: Buildings. The assessment required very detailed on site studies and 305-953-2868 comparison between original record drawings as created by the design Architect and the building as it stands today. Years/term of Engagement: 2013 it , ',At - - - -..ii 6 I4f.Of „. ,. N, ■ �- ti --3' ii . =,---,-, '.' -- :- .4\0404 le 'I' ' :,- '.,-. 7.'''„ J x RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.29 Dover,Kohl(Sr Partners February 26,2015 RELEVANT PROJECT The Temple House Project Desicription Historic Preservation Architect The Temple House operated at the time of the project as a nonprofit Agency Name: Organization known as the Miami Cultural Arts Foundation, located at The Temple House 1415 Euclid Avenue,within the Miami Beach Architectural District and the Flamingo Park local Historic District. Agency Contact: Daniel Davidson The structure was built in 1933,changes were made through the years that added to the floor area,which is currently 14,000 SF organized in two stories Contact Telephone&E-mail: and a mezzanine space.Around 1941 the use of the property was changed 786-280-6565 from its original use and it became the Miami Beach Jewish Center.Years later the property housed another congregation, Knesseth Israel.Around the Years/term of Engagement: same time the building was remodeled by the famous modernist Architect 2011 Igor Polevitzky.The current facade of the building holds many signature elements typical of Mr. Polevitzky's design of the time. After being unoccupied for several years and substantially deteriorated, the building was purchased in 2003 by Mr. Daniel Davidson. Mr. Davidson started the Miami Cultural Arts Foundation. Our firm was hired in 2010 to conduct studies and produce construction documents to turn the building into a multi-use property to hold art exhibits, events for a large number of occupants,conduct seminars and in general a multipurpose property. This presented several challenges as the building was old, deteriorated and it would be classified as an assembly occupancy under the Florida Building Code.The fact that Mr. Davidson wanted to also live in the property added tc the code compliance challenges. Not a single aspect of code compliance was left outside of this process,as well as,architectural,structural and all of the mechanical and electrical systems retrofit.The assembly occupancy triggered a high level of life safety win issues dealing with fire,smoke alarm and sprinkler systems,as well as,ADA ,��1 c r g p compliance and means of egress.The process was completed successfully { and the project was completed for an occupancy of 620 people. - --4144; -14;44 � .wr 1 • ; 2.30 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1111111111` RELEVANT PROJECT IIIIIIMPN Thompson Fish House Project Desicription Historic Preservation Architect JSK Architectural Group conducted a complete assessment and Agency Name: recommendation for the rehabilitation using the Secretary of the Interior's City of Key West Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings that was developed by the National Park Service to guide owners Agency Contact: in the proper treatment for repairs, missing features,and other frequently encountered problems associated with the rehabilitation of historic building: Contact Telephone&E-mail: 305-294-0209 Years/term of Engagement: 2013 , i y '. 3' � 0771V.,, ,. ,,,,----,,-,-g-; ,,,- -----)-- - 1- k I,� ?jam .:� � 'iy%§ �..1, ---i.•.--,-;----_-:,-,-- - , .'=., - s s i, '4 3 ,.y am � /� ii, -7 I ...., —---rf-A, _ , -„,- - 7. ,,, ;dx.---_,0,--,,,-;.,,,, ,I,11,Sp -% ,., - ,,,,,,,,,._ --Ala- = -7 , 0- J'f- / -0-/-*>„frt , , _ it7 ,44- /-,50-it i %jo h ffi / ue :. 000`....r. -',- 4,14:4-;"..47',-,---- 7- ' -- ' mss' / -.y. § ...„--_, ,''4 ' - ' . ''', r „,,,, - ,4 - 3..iiii, ,,,,,,::„:„., 4-4- ----,.. .2.. . a , --_-, I ,ice 4 i /. / -4 —1-ii,„4.14-., - , F 3 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.31 Dover,Kohl Sr Partners February 26,2015 N laillOiP RELEVANT PROJECT' Grove Harbour i Project Desicription Marina Development Historic Preservation Officer Grove Harbour Marina began in 2003 when the developer took over the City of Miami current location. Ellen Uguccioni,then Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Miami presented the designation report to the Historic Preservation Agency Name: Board and how the changes to readapt the project were in compliance with Grove Harbour Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Marina Development On site was nothing more than two extraordinary old seaplane hangars. Agency Contact at the time of These hangars represented a fabulous era of aviation history, not only for designation: I Coconut Grove but for the entire United States. Built in the 1930's,these Felix Lima (deceased) hangars were a part of the original Pan American Airways flying clipper ships Representative of Grove base of operations earning this location National Historic Designation. Harbour Marina The developer, (Grove Harbor Marina) completely restored the hangars to look as they did when new and readapted their use to a more modern Contact Telephone &E-mail: purpose. One hangar houses marine related offices and retail with indoor dry 305-854-6444 storage for vessels to 55 feet and the other is home to The Fresh Market a gourmet food and specialty food retailer. Years/term of Engagement: 2003 Located in the Dinner Key Basin with direct access to Biscayne Bay, Grove Harbor boasts more than 50 boat slips for vessels up to 150 feet. Grove Harbor Marina is a full-service facility run by marine experts. ''-ue 4 ,- <Y s _ P:a� f rte. ', - - .- a fe W-At,_,,le,,,t.,„ 4 1 — if c4 v , G ip e. .._ � ;3 A a- `tea .� e- - � I s . . ar .— € f era. a i, '� ,-I.' i lilt ii� - . ,, ��yy#+{} li 1. f ". -.�,�1,, ,-„ - _,k,'„ t, , „or-) V.- 'x _x if .. , r 2.32 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners is IIIIIMPN RELEVANT PROJECTS Red Fish Grill Matheson Project Desicription Hammock Park Director of Historic Preservation The City of Coral Gables and by means of the efforts of its Historic City of Coral Gables Preservation Board and its Director, Ellen Uguccioni, upon substantial research and conversations with the Miami-Dade Parks and Recreation Agency Name: Department,the preservation office was able to historically designate Red Fish Grill Matheson Hammock Park, built as a WPA project in the 1930s. Matheson Hammock One of the permanent buildings originally constructed was a concession Agency Contact at the time of stand with changing booths. The client wished to readapt the building for us( designation: as a commercial restaurant. The project required the building of a separate City of Coral Gables Historic bathroom facility that was ADA compliant;along with the elimination of Preservation Board certain features that once existed that were no longer operable, and did not satisfy any need for the restaurant.The space was adapted so that the Contact Telephone&E-mail: restaurant could function well,yet maintained many of its original features, 305-460-5093 so that the integrity of the original building was maintained. Years/term of Engagement: 1998 v v _ y / �3 mo , t_ o A:rises . ':::,:iiitia.-- - ", a --,..4 .. ,,,„'„,3,' 4. ,A' ,, ' 'cc-0k -,', . , 'c" i 41-' \ 1 '. i'-' ''''' -,1*k h ' ' -- 4 ,..--'- Ptil 44- -w..."?.„„: *.-- -. 4,,,1 ',, -4 i 1- ), .. z 4 w. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.33 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Chen Moore and Associates is a multi-discipline consulting firm that is a CHEN•M O() RE Florida State and locally certified small business enterprise firm with offices in Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Martin and Alachua Counties. Our expe- rience with the City of Miami Beach includes right-of-way improvements for the City Center, South Pointe and Sunset Islands neighborhoods. In addition, &ASSOCIA I ES we have provided landscape architecture services for the Euclid Streetscape Improvements project (Lincoln Center Building) for R dtO Studio and for the Lincoln Center Courtyard for Lincoln Center Associates. Our experience simi- lar to the services required by the City of Miami Beach for includes providing civil engineering and landscape architecture services for the pedestrianizing of Euclid Avenue between Lincoln Road and Lincoln Lane in the City of Miami Beach. Euclid Streetscape Improvements (Lincoln Center Building) I Miami Beach, FL Chen Moore and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture services for the pedestrianizing of Euclid Avenue between Lincoln Road and Lincoln Lane in the City of Miami Beach.This stretch of road will be incorpo- rated into the historic pedestrian street known as Lincoln Road Mall.The project is funded by the City of Miami Beach through a developer's agreement with Lincoln Center Associates which owns the retail building at the intersection of Euclid Avenue with Lincoln Road. The project requires coordination with various agencies including the City of Miami Beach Planning Department, Public Works, Greenspace management, and Capital Improvements, as well as Miami- Dade County Environmental Protection, Traffic, and Utilities. The scope of work includes providing site design and permitting including layout, hardscape, landscaping, lighting,drainage, and utilities. int IP 1 f ye *w.rr r a°411146` 4r.:749, err• ,a P, r .i:Fo. e�i`f i�ifs 'War + ` Client: R St 0 Studio LLC I I Omar Moreno I 1 305.741.4220 2.34 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners North Shore Bandshell Park Improvements I Miami Beach, FL This project consists of proposed improvements to the existing Bandshell Park located east of Collins Avenue between 72nd and 73rd Streets within the City of Miami Beach. The project includes a new walkway connecting the park to the beachwalk at 72nd Street;the widening of the south sidewalk at 73rd Street 4 c� ` wir which will require either the removal or reconfiguration of on-street parking;the Ir,f+� '�1 q 9 P 9, .1 1 demolition of the bus shelter; landscaping,outdoor accent and security lighting; reconfiguration and/or addition of walkways; installation of an electronic mar- quee;installation of the"Beatles Mandala",a mosaic tile artwork;and new urban elements such as drinking fountains,trash containers and bike racks. Chen Moore and Associates is providing services including civil engineering,land- - scape architecture and irrigation design work that includes conceptual drawings �� for the 72nd Street walkway and 73rd Street sidewalk;design development/final design submittals; estimates of probable construction cost; government permit- � ting (including Miami Beach, PERA — formerly DERM, FDOT, FDEP, and Fish & �`' Wildlife);bidding assistance;and construction administration services. .' /ft Client: Borrelli & Partners Inc I ( Jim Borrelli I 1 305.665.8852 t " • City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project Miami Beach, FL Chen Moore and Associates is responsible for providing surveying, planning, geotechnical investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction docu- ments, bid and award and construction engineering and inspection (CEI) ser- y vices for infrastructure improvements within the public right-of-way (ROW) , areas of the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses 'may% approximately 24,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including: 8,700 LF of 8-inch water main replacements;sewer improvements,stormwater drainage - � improvements; paving & grading; roadway/traffic improvements (streets, side y walks,curb and gutter,drainage,traffic control devices including striping,signing and channelization); streetscaping and landscaping enhancements; decorative, landscape and roadway lighting improvements;and roadway reconstruction. Due to the existing mixed residential and commercial environment of this neighborhood, special design efforts were made to incorporate walkable com- munity elements including meeting all ADA requirements, providing street furniture, providing bicycle paths,upgrading sidewalks, incorporating specialty treatments at crosswalks, landscaping improvements with specialized tree wells to provide a walkable surface and bulb outs to increase pedestrian friendliness P � and safety. This project also required extensive coordination with the public, adjacent CRAs, historic districts and various regulatory agencies. As part of the proposed stormwater and drainage services,extensive analysis was utilizing ICPR Modeling and GIS to meet or exceed required storm- water Level of Services standards. ICPR Modeling was utilized for the design and permitting of 14 drainage gravity wells. The proposed stormwater design included the introduction of catch basins and stormwater piping to effectively collect and route the stormwater to 16 drainage gravity wells with overflow outfall con- nections to Biscayne Bay. Due to the environmental sensitivity of Biscayne Bay design and implementation of water quality treatment measures was an important consideration and design factor of the system prior to outfall to the Bay and was closely coordinated with regulatory agencies during the permitting process. Client:City of Miami Beach I I Maria Hernandez I I 305.673.7071 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.35 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 South Pointe Phase I1l/1V/V - Right-of-Way Improvement Project Miami Beach, FL Chen Moore and Associates is the prime consultant and is respon- Bible for providing surveying, planning,geotechnical investigation, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, bid and award and construction engineering and inspection services •- for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the South Pointe III/IVN neighborhood of Miami Beach. The project encompasses approximately 19,000 LF of ROW infra- structure improvements including 9,300 LF 8"water main replace- � _' -= - ments, stormwater drainage improvements, paving & grading, fir_ ?; L.; streetscaping enhancements, landscaping improvements, lighting ,r improvements, and roadway reconstruction. Additionally, due r . to existing listed contaminated sites within the proximity of the , right of way improvements, environmental coordination includ- ing contaminated sites analysis and consideration of the radius of . f fi . . influence was necessary for coordinating dewatering operations. it Due to the existing mixed residential and commercial environ- , • ment of this neighborhood, special design efforts were made to `. �..° . - incorporate walkable community elements including meeting all ADA requirements, providing street furniture, providing bicycle paths, upgrading sidewalks, incorporating specialty treatments at a crosswalks, landscaping improvements with specialized tree wells . = to provide a walkable surface and bulb outs to increase pedestrian friendliness and safety.This project also required extensive coordi- 0 �' Y P I q .� nation with the public,adjacent CRAB, historic districts and various �° regulatory agencies. r As part of the proposed stormwater and drainage services,extensive analysis was conducted utilizing ICPR Modeling and GIS to meet and/or exceed required stormwater Level of Services standards. ICPR Modeling was utilized for the design and permitting of 21 drainage gravity wells and one drainage pump station.The proposed stormwater design included the introduction of catch basins, and stormwater piping to effectively collect and route the stormwater to 16 drainage gravity wells and stormwater pump station with overflow outfall connections to Biscayne Bay. Due to the environmental sensitivity of Biscayne Bay, design and implementation of water quality treatment measures was an important consid- eration and design factor of the system prior to outfall to the Bay and was closely coordinated with regulatory agencies during the permitting process. Client:City of Miami Beach I I Carla Dixon 305.673.7000 ext.6264 2.36 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners TAB 2 .2 = QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSERS TEAM 2 . 2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM With our team, principal involvement is a given. Principals and experienced staff from each sub-consultant firm will be involved in all phases of the work. Each member of the Dover-Kohl team contributes experience,knowledge and exper- tise in their respective field. Hernan Guerrero will be the Project Manager, serving as a daily contact to the City of Miami Beach staff and manager of internal communications throughout the project. Resumes are included for each key team members, however,additional planners and designers from our studio may also participate in the Charrette and public process and assist with meeting critical deadlines. DOVER, KOHL & PARTNERS Town Planning, Public Engagement& Sustainable Urban Design Jason King, Joseph Kohl, CNU-a AICP,CNU-a Principal Principal Hernan Guerrero, Assoc.AIA,LEED-GA Project Manager James Dougherty, Pamela Stacy, Kenneth Garcia, Donald Shockey, AICP CNU-a CNU-a AICP.CNU-a,LEED-GA Principal,VP,Director of Town Planner Town Planner Urban Planner Design ARC.ML)1S E.,: JI)K 11i s4v iii ; . cst I'v P( ANS Water Management iy CI--I CI ECTURE k OClf', LS COI l . ORATIVE ; Solutions&Sea Level Economic Analysis GROUP Civil Engineering Rise &Landscape Bicycle lE Historic Preservation Lewis Goodkin,CRE Architecture Tactical Piet Dir Cleo President&CFO &Architecture Pi�_�r= ;, Cristobal Jack ncton, Jorge Kuperman, Betancourt,RLA t1 , AIR Director of Planning& •&Pi Ro iel j UdouSt Principal&Project Principal Architect. rvidnager Pros(„.,.',lanager& Manager Landscape Architecture Coastal Expert Ellen Uguccioni Gregory Mendez,PE I'/0 Frank Pallini Director Historic Senior Analyst Preservation Senior Project Manager Nr ; /' hony l Ck / Kailiiiajh PE CSC (Iiii9,1, 1.,.,:rq, z k E ' Senior Engineer Plann i rt,i?�r � .psi RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.37 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Jason King, MCP, CNU-A Principal, Senior Project Director Jason has extensive experience with smart growth,comprehensive planning,new communities and form-based codes.His previous experience as a municipal planner assists in the creation of success- -- — ful,effective plans and codes.Jason leads projects across the country through to implementation, and has participated in over 50 design and comprehensive plan charrettes worldwide. u Selected Projects SEVEN50,THE PROSPERITY PLAN FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA,2012-2014 `' Seven50 is the plan for the seven counties of Southeast Florida for the next fifty years.The region �* includes 121 municipalities and over six million people.Plan creation involved over 5,000 people par- ticipating in a series of regional summits and local workshops and over one million people via an in- teractive website with online weekly polls,a scenario modeler,social media,discussion forums,and a regional data warehouse.Jason led a fifteen-firm,multidisciplinary counsultant team as it worked closely with local universities and regional planning councils,the Florida Department of Transporta- tion,and a 200-member public and private partnership.Jason was principal author of the Seven50 Prosperity Report.Seven50 was funded by the US Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities and was featured on National Public Radio and in The New York Times. Education EL PASO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,El Paso,Texas,2010-2012 Master of Community Planning(MCP) Jason headed the Plan El Paso planning initiative which involved multiple charrettes and a multi- Bachelor of Arts in English(BA) disciplinary team which worked with residents,stakeholders,and officials from the City,state and UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND Fort Bliss Army Base,to create the El Paso's overarching policy document.The plan was unanimously South Kingston,Rhode Island approved by the El Paso City Council and was awarded a 2011 National Award for Smart Growth Excellence by the US Environmental Protection Agency.Jason advises plan implementation which Professional Experience involves capital projects,land development policy,TOD development,and the form-based coding of Town Planner,2006 to present large sections of the City. DOVER,KOHL&PARTNERS BRADENTON FORM-BASED CODE,Bradenton,Florida,2011 Coral Gables,Florida The form-based code provides a regulatory framework to achieve density,walkability,and transit- Senior Planner,2004-2006 readiness in Bradenton's core and central neighborhoods. Sustainability permeates the document, MONROECOUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT and mandates or provides incentives for eco-friendly building and planning at many different scales, Monroe County,Florida Keys,Florida from the corridor and neighborhood to construction details. Jason headed the Transect planning for the SmartCode based-code which received a Driehaus Form-Based Codes Award in 2012. Assistant Planner,2002-2004 WASHINGTON COUNTY HAMMOND COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN,Hammond,Louisiana,2009 Hopkinton and Richmond,Rhode Island As Project Director Jason headed the planning team as it worked with residents to identify the prin- ciples of quality design and efficiency present in the City's most values places and discuss how those elements could be applied to newly developing areas of the City.Local goals correlated closely with Affiliations state-wide goals:citizens seek to create enduring places that succeed economically while also contrib- Certified by the American Institute of uting to a high quality of life.The plan was adopted by the City in 2011 and implementation is underway. Certified Planners(AICP) PROSPECTS FOR SOUTHEAST LEE COUNTY(DR/GR PLAN),Lee County,Florida,2008 Accredited Member,Congress for the As Project Director for the Lee County Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource Initiative,which in- New Urbanism(CNU-A) volved a 150 square mile region of southeast Lee County,Jason led a planning effort that involved Certified Charrette Planner, detailed ecological mapping,surface and groundwater modeling,traffic impact evaluation,multiple land National Charrette Institute use studies, a transferable development rights program,form-based coding for new communities and implementing amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. Selected Lectures The Plan received an award from 1,000 Friends of Florida,a Florida APA Project Award(2009),a CNU APA National Conference:"Form-Based Charter Award of Excellence(2010),and a Driehaus Form-Based Codes Award(2011). Codes 10+Years Later",2012 MASTER PLANNING&CODING,Montgomery,Alabama,2007 CNU 19 National Congress:"Today's Best Jason served as Town Planner and later as Project Director for the Downtown Plan,where he has fo- Form-Based Codes",2011 cused efforts on plan implementation. He has worked closely with the Planning Department through- Florida Department of Community Affairs: out the implementation process,assisting in the review of new development and leading design im- "Comprehensive Planning for the plementation workshops for the City.Since the Downtown Plan Jason has led five additional master 21st Century",2010 plan and coding charrettes in the City.In 2008 the Downtown Plan received an Outstanding Planning Alabama Public Works Conference: Award from the Alabama Chapter of the American Planning Association. "Public Works&Civic Art",2009 Pulicotions FAPA Annual Conference:"Protecting New Town St.Jerome,King,2013 Sensitive Habitat in the Florida Keys",2()05 A Legal Guide to Urban&Sustainable Development for Planners,Developers&Architects,Slone,2008 Form-Based Codes,Parolek,2008 Sustainable Urbanism,Farr,2008 The SmartCode Solution to Sprawl,Emerson,2007 2.38 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Joseph A. Kohl, CNU-Accredited Founding Principal Joseph Kohl was among the founders who established Dover,Kohl&Partners in 1987. Concerned with ever increasing urban sprawl,Joe and Victor began designing sustainable streets,towns,and / regions for municipalities and private clients across the country and internationally. Together,they have developed a successful public design process,combining cutting-edge visualization techniques = with community participation strategies. Joe is recognized nationally as an innovator in urban design and graphic communication. He pio- neered the use of computer imaging simulations for urban design projects,winning several national awards for his work. He is known for his expertise in applying graphic techniques to development 1, ordinances,and he has authored many of the firm's illustrated land development regulations. Joe . : is responsible for daily business operations and internal management of the firm. He oversees the firm's urban design,working hands-on with the Town Planners to refine and constantly improve de- signs for walkable,sustainable urban places. Joe received his Bachelor of Architecture degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute,where he also -6 studied at their Washington-Alexandria Center for Architecture. He received his Master of Archi- tecture in Suburb and Town Design from the University of Miami. Joe is a founding member of the Congress for the New Urbanism(CNU),the leading organization promoting walkable,neighborhood- Education based development as an alternative to suburban sprawl,and is a CNU-Accredited Professional. Joe is also a founder and board member of the Form-Based Codes Institute,a not-for-profit think tank Of f�Townlo that focuses on quality control,education,and advancement of form-based codes as an alternative Ut apb�lr ITY F, itrr qn a• to Euclidean zoning. He serves as the Institute's treasurer and he frequently instructs courses on Coral Gables Florida , the application and implementation of Form-Based Codes. Joe has also taught numerous design and media courses at the University of Miami. Bachelor Of Architecture Se ry l C 2 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTiniftr AND STATE UNNERSI1Y Vice Chair,Form-based Codes Institute,2004 to present Blacksburg,Virginia Treasurer,Form-Based Codes Institute,2004 to 2012 Instructor,Form-Based Codes Institute courses: Professional Experience, FBCI 201 Course,Tampa FL, April 2013 Principal, 987topresent FBCI 201 Course,Providence RI,June 2011 DOVER,'KOHL&PARTN S FBCI 201&301 Courses,Portland ME,May 2011 coral' beltrr�d8 Panelist,Urban Land Institute's Technical Advisory Panel,Coral Springs,FL,May-June 2013 Project Director,1986-1' 7 Panelist,FBCI Codes Forum,Chicago IL,April 2013 ',,Platle7ransfcirfilatinn Laboratory. Trustee Member,Chamber South,2008 AlitIVERSIIYOF Member,Technical Review Committee,South Miami-Dade Watershed Plan,2004-2006 School of Architecture Coral Gables,Florida Design Expert/Resource Team Member,Florida Public Officials Design Institute,2002 Charter Member,Congress for the New Urbanism,1993 to present Intern()At4hite0t,1985 'ARD7� 1.ASSOCIATES Board Member,Urban Environment League,2003-2004 Fairfax,Virginia Professional Design Advisory Board,Fairchild Tropical Garden,1994-1996 • Teaching, Selected Lectures f Faculty, "Introduction to New Urbanism,"Univ.of Miami Law School,November 2013 tY:2Q��pr ►t FORM-BASED CODES INSTITUTE "1"Generation Transit-Oriented Developments,What Did We Learn?"Rail—volution Annual Confer- ence,Hollywood CA,October 2012 Visiting ilAMI 99 UNI�I "Form-Based Coding:the Tool for Sustainable Community Design,"National Trust for Historic Places ERRIT1l0 National Conference,Austin TX,October 2010 School of Architecture ' "Form-based Codes,"Governor's Annual Conference on Smart Growth,Atlantic City NJ,2005 Faculty,1 "Retail Architecture and the Street,"Congress for the New Urbanism,Milwaukee,WI,June 1999 FLORIDA GOV IOR''SSUMMERPRA GRAM FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN "Making complete neighborhoods," Jax Pride 1999,Jacksonville,Florida,March 1999 "Infill Development in the Urban Corridor,Miami to West Palm Beach," First South Florida Sustain- able Building Conference and Exhibition.1997 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.39 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Hernan Guerrero, •Associate AIA, LEED GA Project Manager, Town Planner Hernan has a strong background in Geography,City&Regional Planning and Architecture. He has ' '`'' 's a worked on comprehensive planning, neighborhood analysis, transit oriented development, and af- .Y fordable housing projects. His diverse background working for community development corpora- .,, tions,business improvement districts, municipal government and Geographic Information Systems , ' companies,give him a solid understanding of how information and public engagement are key to the '. $'% development process. Selected Projects t„ FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY,Monterey,CA,2014-2015 ,,,,:,,_,1:‘4., ,,'",,A In October,Hernan joined the DKP team and began working on the development of Regional Urban :, Design Guidelines(RUDG)for the forme Fort Ord Army base in Monterey, California.In February, >> 2015,the team travelled to the area,the size of San Francisco,to conduct a series of charrettes in ',+ multiple municipalities throughout the area,which inform the development of the RUDG that will be i .;, `; '°-1 completed in April of this year. MIAMI 2100-THE MIAMI RIVER IN THE FACE OF SEA LEVEL RISE,Miami,FL,2012-2013 •Education °" The FIU School of Architecture has been working for the last 4 years on re-envisioning how South 7:::::‘2a:''''',-:''':' ,t Florida and specifically communities within Miami-Dade will deal with Sea level Rise.Hernan spent g ► two semesters working on a vision for the Miami area and it's abutting areas.The results of this work 4:4 were exhibited in the Coral Gables Museum from November 2014 to March 2015. CITY OF MOUNT VERNON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,Mount Vernon,NY,2008-2010 R A 1.H� i C '. , '. The City of Mount Vernon,New York,began a comprehensive plan update in 2008.Hernan was in- BrQ New York , , strumental in managing the multiple facets of the endeavour including the design and adminsitration .4:. < of the kick-off survey, organizing the different stake-holder and public visioning sessions, as well fh±�t t�fr' ►hly' as coordinating the preparation of transit studies and commercial corridor analysis. Hernan was � � 'Y . • also instrumental in writing grant proposals and securing financing to advance specific`area action Wor er,MA ' plans'. During this time, Hernan also represented the City of Mount Vernon at New York and New Jersey Metropolitan Transit Council(NYMTC)meetings,as this entity investigated the potential for a Profs ion `I Ex eri c '' regional multi-modal system that would make Mount Vernon a regional logistics centers. '..11..."— ro MYRTLE AVENUE REVITALIZATION PROJECT/BID(MARP),BROOKLYN,NY 2007-2008 f�'we Serving as Mainstreet Program Coordinator for MARP and the Myrtle Avenue Business Improvement . 1 •: , '. a � 'i, District,Hernan was tasked with managing activites aimed at restoring the historic character along . I �� x 22 blocks of this main thoroughfare through downtown Brooklyn.Initiatives ranged from coordinating to t�� the planting of trees with NY City Parks and street resurfacing,to providing assistance to property R=,°«' `' & ', and business owners with the restoration of historic details,in coordination with the Staqte Historic 47 '*° to Preservation Office,such as cornices and lintels,installing open-link gates and standardized signage. ' _. '' 'd'; In some cases, property owners were provided assistance in developing a potential development 'z � � O analysis of their property.Additionally Hernan coordinated street fairs and markets to attract foot ;A:' r2-y • t '". ,° traffic to the avenue and promote the many businesses in the district. ,` AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN FOR CYPRESS HILLS,BROOKLYN,NY,2004 2007 .':� ' � 1 Hernan was selected as a CITI Community Development Grantee in 2004,to document all of the a +r .0. x 1. �- , ° .,f:d'° i4$(r,' foreclosed and blighted homes in the Cypress Hills neighborhood of Brooklyn,NY for the Cypress Hills ' ' t ��w r s Local Development Corporation(LDC).He prepared a pipeline of developable homes and created an ° ` ' ' affordable housing plan that included recommendations for public-private partnerships and the cre- E„ + ,', ation of`green'homes.He was hired as Community Development Project Manager in 2006 to manage " the gut rehabilitation of 14 homes,including coordination with the federal(HUD),ctate(DHCR)and 'S:, y '�' ' " z city(HPD)to create the agency's first Energy Star rated homes program. Affiliations COMMUNITY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITATIVE(MYCITI),Brooklyn,NY,2006 _- ' ' In 2006,the City of New York,at the behest of the Municipal Art Society(MAS)developed an online 'ApliSiii4 '' i.411,:'''' '' , nkit �:1P GAA information sharing portal that provided all of the city's GIS data as well as Census,Electoral district `" `, information and a single place for members of the 59 community Districts in NY to obtain information on municipal services.Hernan served as liaison,facilitator and trainer to Community Board 2. 2,40 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners James Dougherty, AICP, CNU-a Principal, VP - Director of Design James Dougherty is the Director of Design at Dover,Kohl&Partners.James has dedicated his career to helping communities envision and implement a more walkable,sustainable future.James began working with Dover-Kohl in 1996 and has since participated in over 140 design and form-based coding charrettes in the United States and abroad.James works closely with the firm's Principals,Project Directors and Urban Designers to establish the design direction of each of the office's projects.He participates in all aspects of the office's work,including public involvement,development of master plans,regulating plans and form-based codes.James also specializes in the creation of many of the company's three-dimensional illustrations,using a blend of hand-drawn and computer techniques. James holds a Bachelor of Architecture degree from Hampton University and a Master of Architec- ture degree from the Town&Suburb Design Program at the University of Miami,where he serves as an Adjunct Professor.He is certified by the American Planning Association and the Congress for the New Urbanism.James is an instructor with the Form-Based Codes Institute(FBCI),and has led numerous sessions at FBCI workshops.James has successfully completed all portions of the Archi- r tectural Registration Exam. Education James'graphics and visualizations illustrating sustainable urban design and form-based code prin- Master of Architecture ciples have been published in over fifteen books. He co-curated the 2012 exhibit"The Art of the New Town and'UtturbDesign Program Urbanism"featuring over 200 visualization artworks by leading practitioners of the New Urbanist UNIVERSITYOFMIAMI movement. James founded and continues to co-lead the Congress for the New Urbanism's urban Coral Gables Florida design and illustration training series,the CNU Art Room. James was honored to receive the 2012 ' Congress for the New Urbanism Florida's"Charles A.Barrett Memorial Award for Continuing Excel- Bachelor of Architecture lence in Architecture And Urban Design". The American Society of Architectural Illustrators has HAMPTON UNIVERSITY presented James with"Awards of Excellence"in their prestigious Architecture in Perspective(AIP) Hampton,Virginia 24 and 25 international cometitions,and"Top Informal Category Award"in their AIP 29 competition. Affiliations Member,American Planning Association,2005 to present(AICP certification) Professional Experience Member,Congress for the New Urbanism,2002 to present(CNU-A certification) Director of Design,1996 to present Member,American Society of Architectural Illustrators,2008 to present DOVER,KOHL&PARTNERS Coral Gables,Florida Lectures Intern Architect,1995 The Importance of Art and Illustration in the New Urbanism"Lowe Museum,2011,Miami,FL MMM DESIGN GROUP Norfolk,Virginia "Brief History of American Urbanism,""Brownfield and Greenfield Projects,"and "Infill and Redevelopment Projects,"Form-Based Codes Institute,2007-2012 :ASSISIOnt Superindendent,1991 "Designing in Public-New Urbanist Charrettes,"Co-keynote speaker with Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, PROJECT MANAGEMENT&DESIGN,INC American Institute of Architecture Students,South Quad conference,2008,Miami,FL Virginia Beach,Virginia Publications of Illustrations and Writings Teaching Sustainable Urbanism and Beyond,Tigran Haas,2012 Facultr,2007topresent Sprawl Repair Manual,Galina Tachieva,2010 FORM-BASED CODES INSTITUTE Retrofitting Suburbia,Ellen Dunham-Jones and June Williamson,2009 Form-Based Codes,Daniel G.Parolek,AIA,2008 AdjunctProfessor,'2006,2012t©present, Sustainable Urbanism,Douglas Farr,2008 UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI Redesigning Cities:Principles.Practice.Implementation,Jonathan Barnett,2008 i of Architecture The Charrette Handbook,National Charrette Institute,2006 Coral Gables,Florida Getting to Smart Growth II,Smart Growth Network,2003 Mixed-Use Development Handbook,ULI,2003 New Urbanism:Comprehensive Report&Best Practices Guide,Robert Steuteville,2003 Greyfields into Goldfields.Dead Malls Become Living Neighborhoods,CNU,2002 PlaceMaking:Developing Town Centers.Main Streets&Urban Villages,C.Bohl,2002 Community by Design,Kenneth B.Hall and Gerald A.Porterfield,2001 New American Urbanism,John A.Dutton,2000 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.41 Dover,Kohl(Sr Partners February 26,2015 Pamela Stacy, CNU-A Project Director I Town Planner Pam Stacy has directed projects at every scale drawing on a background in both Planning and Archi- tecture. Pam focuses on form-based codes, comprehensive plans, master plans, and architectural } standards and has experience throughout the United States and internationally.When not directing projects Pam works as lead designer on illustrative plans working closely with the public to help envi- sion more walkable and sustainable futures.Prior to joining Dover-Kohl,Pam worked in architecture offices designing homes and community buildings, and producing construction documents. During s this time she gained experience working with municipalities to get projects approved and working with construction managers on-site—both skills that give her a valuable perspective when creating new master plans and form-based codes. Pam received her Bachelor of Architecture and her Master of Architecture in Suburb and Town De- sign from the University of Miami.She is a certified Charrette planner and is CNU accredited. Selected Projects COCOA BEACH GATEWAYS MASTER PLAN,Cocoa Beach,Florida,2014 Cocoa Beach has remained relatively untouched for several decades,surviving on outside attractors Education like the Space Shuttle Program.Now the City wants to be"Open for Business"and attract new growth to its commercial areas to attract more vistors and increase its tax base.Pamela led the effort as Proj- Master of Architecture ect Director to create the Gateways Master Plan. The resulting vision redefines SR 520 as a primier in Suburb:and Town Design east-west corridor connecting the Banana River to the Ocean with a multiway boulevard.The plan lays UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI out a path to revise fine tune development regulations allowing redevelopment to occur. CoralGables,Florida Bachelor of Architecture SEVEN50,THE PROSPERITY PLAN FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA,2012-2014 UNIVERSITY he r of Architecture MIAMI Seven50 is the plan for the seven counties of Southeast Florida for the next fifty years.The region includes 121 municipalities and over six million people. Plan creation involved over 5,000 people Coral Gables,Florida participating in a series of regional summits and local workshops and over one million people via an t1Ce interactive website. Pamela was a primary corridinator for all public events and was the principal Professional Experience Town Planner,2006 to present editor of the Seven50 Prosperity Report.Seven50 was funded by the US Office of Sustainable Housing DOVER,KOHL&PARTNERS and Communities and was featured on National Public Radio and in The New York Times. Coral Cables,Florida EL PASO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,El Paso,Texas,2010-2012 : r I/Job Captain,2005-2006 Pamela assisted in and managed the production of over 250 square acres in El Paso while working on es ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR the Comprehensive Plan for the City. Pamela was the primary writer for the Urban Design Element and Aitatnonte Springs,fiorida`' head editor for the overall document.Connecting El Paso Plan was a first step in the comprehensive planning initiative and was unanimously approved by the El Paso City Council and was awarded a 2011 s + finer/Project Manager National Award for Smart Growth Excellence by the US Environmental Protection Agency.The complete comprehensive plan has been submitted to the City for estimated approval by May 2012. 1TES,INC.Orlando,Florida JAMESTOWN MALL AREA PLAN,St.Louis County,Missouri,2010 rP; `1 Jamestown Mall,located in north St.Louis County is in decline. As project director,Pamela led the >, 1GINFERING, team in an effort to find ways to redevelop the mall property in a way that is sustainable and a benefit � D ION to the surrounding community. The area plan shows the transformation of the mall parking fields into tio. da a diverse walkable,mixed-use village center. Affiliations WEST FAIRVIEW AVENUE,Montgomery,Alabama,2010 lamer-Congress for the New The plan proposes transforming the avenue, an auto-dependent strip of commercial uses, into a Urbanism,2007 to present "main street"with pedestrian provisions like sidewalks,street trees,benches,awnings and on-street parking and encouraging a greater variety of street-oriented civic and retail uses.The plan was de- atedited,2010 de- signed in conformance with the City's existing form-based code overlay for ease of implementation Certified Charrette Planner, and included a Transect map for the study area.Pam served as project manager for this effort. N#Utiai Charrette Institute,2007 THE BLUEPRINT FOR SPRINGHILL AND OVERLAY ZONING ORDINANCE,Mobile,Alabama,2007 Graphics in Publications The Blueprint for Spring Hill outlines the necessary steps to create much-needed walkable centers LEE'D-ND Handbook,2009 for this gracious district of Mobile. The plan identified three key commercial intersections and dem- Form-Based Codes, Daniel G. Parolek, onstrated their evolution over time from auto-oriented strip shopping centers into memorable meeting AIA,2008 places. Pam served as project manager for this effort. Sustainable Urbanism,Douglas Farr,2008 A Legal Guide to Urban and Sustainable Speaking Engagements Development forPlanners,Developers Marketing Innovation:Stimulating Public Engagement Through An Integrated Digital PR Platform and Architects,Daniel K.Slone, Doris Florida APA Conference,September 2013 S.Goldstein,W.Andrew Gowder,2008 Public Engagement In The Information Age FPZA Conference,June 2014 2.42 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Kenneth Garcia, CNU Town Planner Kenneth has been with Dover, Kohl&Partners since 2007 and has participated in over 30 design charrettes. He produces many of the firm's illustrations and renderings, using a combination of computer graphics and traditional watercolor techniques. Kenneth received both his Master of Ar- chitecture and his Bachelor of Architecture from Andrews University,a leading center for the study of New Urbanism. He is a member of the Congress for the New Urbanism(CNU),and is a certified Charrette Planner through the National Charrette Institute. Kenneth grew up in Costa Rica and -fr* Mexico,and is fluent in Spanish. While studying at Andrews University,Kenneth played a key role in the development of the New Ur- banist curriculum in the School of Architecture. He was a founding member of Andrews University's chapter of the Students for the New Urbanism,and was a member of the design team that won a CNU Charter Award for their work on the Saucier Town Plan for Saucier,Mississippi. He continues to serve his Alma Mater,acting as a visiting lecturer and critic for several Charter Award winning projects at the School of Architecture. Selected Projects Degrees CAPITOL CORRIDOR PLAN,Lansing,Michigan,2014 Master of Architecture The Capitol Corridor plan extends approximately 19-miles from the capitol building to the town of ANDREWS UNIVERSITY Webberville.Spanning 10 municipalities,the corridor transverses cities,towns and countryside.The Berrien Springs,Michigan resulting plan outlines a vision to guide future growth,change and preservation in the corridor;it also provides recommendations for municipalities and key stakeholders to carry these ideas to implemen- Bachelor of Architecture tation.Kenneth served as project manager and illustrator for this project. ANDREWS UNIVERSITY Berrien Springs,Michigan WATER CAMPUS MASTER PLAN,Baton Rouge,Louisiana,2013 Working for the Baton Rouge Area Foundation,Dover-Kohl led the initial design of the 30 acre cam- pus that will be the new home of The Water Institute of the Gulf.The campus is expected to grow into Professional Experience a major center for the science and research of river deltas. The Water Campus'walkable streets, Town Planner,2007 to present public spaces and urban buildings will be a major step toward fostering a better connection between DOVER,KOHL&PARTNERS downtown Baton Rouge and Lansing State University.Kenneth served as Project Director and illus- Coral Gables,Florida trator for this project. Honors EL PASO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,El Paso,Texas,2012 CNU ACADEMIC CHARTER AWARD,2007 Over the course of two years,Dover Kohl has led the process of rewriting El Paso's Comprehensive The Saucier Town Plan Plan.Through multiple charrettes Dover Kohl worked with the residents,stakeholders and city offi- Andrews University cials to create a guide to the City's future growth and enable Transit-oriented Development.Kenneth served as a town planner and illustrator for this effort. TAU SIGMA DELTA HONOR SOCIETY IN ARCHITECTURE,2007 MONTGOMERY NEIGHBORHOOD MASTER PLANS,Montgomery,Alabama,2010-2011 Andrews University Following the Downtown Master Plan adopted in 2007,Dover Kohl returned to Montgomery for sever- al neighborhood master plans aimed at the revitalization and redevelopment of underutilized areas of the city.These plans were all created through extensive public participation.West Fairview Avenue Affiliations focused on the transformation of an aging suburban corridor.The Plan for Oak Park and Centennial Member,Congress for the New Urbanism, Hill looked at revitalization strategies for a historic neighborhood.The Maxwell Boulevard Neighbor- 2004 to present hood Plan targeted the redevelopment of key sites adjacent to Maxwell Air Force Base and Overlook Certified Charrette Planner, National Park.Kenneth served as a town planner and illustrator for these efforts. Charrette Institute,2007 CURRIDABAT MASTER PLAN&FORM-BASED CODE,Curridabat,Costa Rica,2011 Dover,Kohl&Partners teamed with lead firm Castillo Arquitectos of Guatamala City,Guatamala,to Lectures &Exhibits create a Master Plan for the municipality of Curridabat,on the outskirts of the Costa Rican capital of CNU 22-The Art of Street Design,2014 San Jose,with a focus on walkability and livability. Curridabat will be the first municipality in Costa Art of the New Art of Street Exhibit,2012 Rica to officially implement a Form-Based Code.It is the recipient of a 2014 CNU Charter Award for CNU 20 - Sket Urbanism as a Foundation for Best City Plan.Kenneth served as a town planner and illustrator for this project. Quick Charrette Hand Drawing,2012 Service Visiting Critic,Andrews University,2008-2014 CERENID Orphanage Mission Trip,2006 President and Chapter Founder,Students for the New Urbanism,2004-2006 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.43 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Donald P Shockey, AICP, CNU-A, LEED GA Multidisciplinary Town Planner Donald is multi-disciplinary urban planner with 18 years of wide-ranging public and private sector planning experience including ten years shaping the redevelopment of Miami Beach. A Florida na- ,/ tive, Donald grew up near the small Central Florida town of Cocoa whose historic brick buildings F and traditional main street struck a chord with him at an early age. After college,he worked in the j international development field and lived in downtown Washington DC where he gained a school of life appreciation for planning,urbanism,and urban revitalization. He moved to South Beach in 1991 and joined in the community-based revitalization of the Art Deco historic district which set the stage for Miami Beach's transformation into a global destination. He then worked on a similar effort pro- , � moting revitalization in North Beach centered on the area's MiMo design heritage. Donald went on to work as a capital projects planner for Miami Beach helping the City sensitively bring its public realm infrastructure up to par with the sophisticated private sector development tak- ing place. He then joined the renowned planning and urban design firm EDAW prior to its acquisition by AECOM where he led the creation of a number of master plans for Tampa,Hallandale Beach,and other Florida cities all of which centered on creating liveable,walkable,and sustainable places. Dur- ing the great recession he worked as a planner in Afghanistan for two years where he strived to link the development of military-related infrastructure to the future needs of local civilian populations. Education His subsequent extensive travel in the Middle East afforded him a better understanding of both the Master of Arts,Public Administration virtues of ancient development patterns and the missteps of futuristic mega-developments. Upon UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA returning to Miami,Donald continued applying his widely diverse experience to various planning con- Gainesville,FL suiting assignments. A believer in continuous self-improvement,he was among the first to earn the AICP-Certified Urban Designer accreditation in 2014. He recently moved from leafy Miami Shores to Bachelor of Arts,Political Science and Miami's more urban Buena Vista neighborhood near the Design District and Midtown where he can Environmental Studies walk and bike as part of his daily routine. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville,FL Accreditatjons Professional Experience Leadership Institute of Certified Planners,2005-present Senior Planner,Bell David Planning Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Associate,2009-present Estidama Pearl Qualified Professional,2011-present Group/The Corradino Group Congress for New Urbanism Accreditation,2013-present Miami,FL,October 2013—present American Institute of Certified Planners-Certified Urban Designer,2014-present Principal Planner,City of Fort Lauderdale, American Planning Association,2002 to present September Principal 2012—May of Fort Coast Chapter of APA Florida,2009,2012-present Senior Master Planner/Project Manager, Selected Projects RMS/IAP Worldwide Services TRI-RAIL COASTAL LINK STUDIES Kandahar Air Field,Afghanistan,January Completed a range of studies related to the planned development of commuter rail service on the 2010—February 2012 Florida East Coast rail tracks from Miami to Jupiter. Studies included identifying community charac- teristics around each of 25 planned stations,assessing social,economic,and cultural impacts within Senior Planner,EDAW/AECOM,Miami the station areas, and reviewing hundreds of local plans governing planned development around Beach,FL May 2005—January 2009 stations. Senior Capital Projects Planner, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN STANDARDS AND REVIEW CRITERIA City of Miami Beach,May 2005—January Identified refinements and updates to the 2003 Downtown Ft.Lauderdale Master Plan and developed 2009 a structured evaluation matrix to ensure development project compliance with extensive planning and urban design standards contained in the Master Plan. Assistant Director/Executive Director, CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH CITYWIDE MASTER PLAN North Beach Development Corporation, Led a team of planners, urban designers, landscape architects, economic development analysts, Miami Beach,FL April 1995—October and graphic specialists in developing a transformative plan to recast a sprawling oceanfront city of 2000 40,000 into a walkable,sustainable and more liveable community with a hierarchy of city,district,and Service neighborhood centers. The project included developing a 3-d model of every structure in the city for use in generating alternate development scenarios. Miami-Dade Community Image Advisory Board,2009-2010 TAMPA RIVERWALK MASTER PLAN Vice Mayor,Miami Shores Village Council, Led a team of planning,design,engineering,lighting,wayfinding,and other professionals in develop- April 2009 to April 2010 ing a master plan for the Tampa Riverwalk which is intended to transform Tampa's neglected 2.4 mile urban waterfront into an iconic urban amenity that reconnects the City's downtown with its scenic Miami Shores Village Planning and Zoning Board, waterfront and acts as a catalyst for extensive redevelopment. The project will link neighborhoods, October 2002 to 2004 civic and cultural facilities,parks,hotels,and residential developments and serve as a multi-purpose public space featuring public art,interpretive elements,and engaging design features. 2.44 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl Sz Partners ANTHONY TEPEDINO GARCIA I I STREET PLANS PRINCIPAL PROJECT ROLE: PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE AND PROJECTS MANAGER i Anthony Garcia is a Principal of The Street Plans Collaborative, and he will serve as both Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager for the project. Anthony leads many of Street Plan's projects in Florida and throughout the South East Region. He is a leader in the field of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Prior to launching the firm's Miami office, Anthony was Project Director for six years at the Dover Kohl & Partners affiliated architecture firm Chael Cooper& Associates. His work there gave him a strong background of urban planning that includes urban design, policy writing and code analysis. He has experience in hosting public meetings, and has completed a number of bicycle and pedestrian plans at the scale of city, neighborhood, and campus and contributed to the codes and policies that help shape the resulting spaces. As a writer, and advocate, Tony's work has appeared in or been featured by The Daily Business Review, Atlantic Cities, Next American City Magazine, New Urban News, The Real Deal, Momentum Magazine, Streetsblog, the Miami Herald, the El Paso Times, and The Miami New Times, among other publications. Most recently he was invited to be part-time adjunct faculty at the University of Miami School of Architecture, teaching an online New Urbanism class, and an architecture studio. From 2008 to 2012 he was the Publisher and Managing editor of the transportation blog TransitMiami.com, a web journal dedicated to public participation and discourse in South Florida. He is also Chairman of the Green Mobility Network, a Miami-based organization that advocates for greater use of active transportation throughout the region. Among the many professional organizations he is active with are the Association of Bicycle and Pedestrian Professionals, the Congress for the New Urbanism, the Dade Heritage Trust, the Urban Environment League, and the Miami Chapter of the Congress of the New Urbanism. Anthony holds a Bachelor of Arts in Architecture and Urban Design from New York University. His focus of study at NYU was community development and participation in the planning process, with a concentration on the use of technology in garnering public support. He went on to receive his Masters in Architecture from the University of Miami, where he worked as a research assistant on a number of urban policy papers related to code writing and urban development. His work as a researcher at UM brought him in contact with internationally renowned architects and urban planners and helped him develop a keen understanding of the connection between urban form and the policies that shape it. He is currently pursuing his architectural license, and plans to add this skill to the company suite of services. Anthony was consistently on the prestigious Deans List at New York University prior to graduating with Honors for his research into the development of Modern Cuban Architecture. This led to an invitation to participate in a summer design studio at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. While at the University of Miami he was one of a handful of students invited to the Rome Program, an intensive six month program of study into the history of traditional urbanism and architecture. Most recently he was one of a select few regional participants in the LEED-Homes pilot program, where his work on a historic South Miami cottage led to a Gold rating and a Dade Heritage Trust Award for excellence in preservation. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.45 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 ANTHONY TEPEDINO GARCIA 6815 SW 57 Terrace I I Miami, FL I I tony @streetplans.org 11 305.978.6426 THE STREET PLANS COLLABORATIVE, PRINCIPAL I I MIAMI, FL I I APRIL 2009 — PRESENT • Village of Pinecrest U.S. 1 Mobility Plan, Pinecrest, FL • Miami Beach Bicycle Master Plan, Miami Beach, FL • University of Miami Pedestrian Safety Study • Northwest Community Master Plan, El Paso, TX, SmartCode Application • Bayfront Parkway, Miami, FL, Tactical Urbanism Pop-up Park • El Paso, TX Plan El Paso TX Ci tywide Bicycle Atlas, Handlebar Survey • Brighton Boulevard, Denver, CO, Context-Sensitive Street Design Plan and Technical Assistance • Mission Valley Infill Master Plan, El Paso, TX, SmartCode Application • Westminster, CO 2030 Bicycle Master Plan Project website • El Paso, TX Plan El Paso Comprehensive Plan, Charrette, and Website • City of Miami, FL Health District Pedestrian and Bicycle Study, Handlebar Survey • SmartCode Bicycle Module Calibration and Handlebar Survey, Fitchburg, WI • El Paso, TX Connect El Paso: BRT/Transit Oriented Development Master Plan • El Paso, TX Connect El Paso: Website, Public Outreach Tool • Miami, FL MiMo - Biscayne Boulevard Streetscape Analysis • Cambridge, MA Somerville Transportation Management Association Study • Greenville, SC Stone Avenue Corridor Project Website • Miami, FL Urban Environment League Website • South Miami, Fl LEED GOLD Chael-Dover Cottage • Miami, FL Calle Ocho Mixed-Use Development • Miami, FL Biscayne Shores Mixed-Use Development • Hali'i'maile, HI Hali'i'maile Architectural Standards UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, ADJUNCT FACULTY I I MIAMI, FL I I AUG 2012 — PRESENT EDUCATION + HONORS • Urban Environment League Orchid Award for Transit Commentary, 2011 • University of Miami School of Architecture, Masters of Architecture, 2005 • University of Miami School of Architecture, Rome Program for City Planning, 2003 • Harvard University, Graduate School of Design Summer Architecture Program, 2002 • New York University, B.A. Urban Planning & Architecture, 2002. RECENT LECTURES, WRITING + AWARDS • "Regional Transportation in Miami-Dade," CNU-Florida Statewide Meeting, 21 Feb, 2013 • "Tactical Transit," Purple Line, 3 March, 2013 • "Connecting South Dade," City of Pinecrest Transit Meeting, 10 Nov, 2012 • "Tactical Urbanism Panel," Florida APA Conference, 12 Sep, 2012 • "Tactical Urbanism Panel," Congress for the New Urbanism 20, May 12, 2012 • "Urban Freeways: Devastation & Opportunity," Congress for the New Urbanism, May 11, 2012 • "The Greening of Biscayne Boulevard," Op-Ed, Miami Herald, March 2, 2012 • "Miami's Urban Renaissance," Social Media Week Panel, February 2012 • Tactical Urbanism Volume 2, Street Plans Press, February 2012 2.46 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners MIKE LYDON, CNU-A I I STREET PLANS PRINCIPAL PROJECT ROLE: PLANNING AND DESIGN SUPPORT 4 ,; in Mike Lydon is a Principal of The Street Plans Collaborative, and he will primarily provide planning eir and design support for the project. Before launching the firm in 2009, Mike worked for Smart Growth Vermont, the Massachusetts Bicycle Coalition, and Ann Arbor's GetDowntown Program. From 2006 - 2009 Mike worked for Duany Plater-Zyberk and Company (DPZ), an international --' l" "�' ;, leader in the practice of smart growth planning, design, and research techniques. At DPZ Mike . - worked extensively on Miami 21, the recipient of the American Planning Association's 2011 ,„ National Planning Excellence Award, and contributed to several other research initiatives and smart y °`�' growth projects. As a planner,writer, and advocate,Mike's work has appeared in or been featured by CNN Headline News, Planetizen, Grist, Utne Reader, Next American City Magazine, New Urban News, Planning Magazine, Streetsblog, the Miami Herald, the El Paso Times, and The Village Voice, among other publications. Mike collaborated with Andres Duany and Jeff Speck in writing The Smart Growth Manual, published by McGraw-Hill in 2009, and honored by Planetizen as one of the top ten planning books of 2010. A founding member of the New England Chapter of the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), a Board Member for CNU New York, and a steering committee member of the Next Generation of New Urbanists, Lydon remains active in both local and national planning, design, and smart growth advocacy issues. He also speaks regularly at trainings and conferences on the topics of smart growth, planning and social media, complete streets, tactical urbanism, and active transportation. Mike remains a regular contributor to Planetizen and is a founding co-editor of A Living Urbanism, a journal chronicling the ever-changing built environment. He was also selected in 2009 as one of 34 Urban Vanguards by Next American City magazine. Mike is the primary author of The Open Streets Project and Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action, Long-Term Change, two research efforts contributing to Pattern Cities, a project about cities and the ideas they incubate. While living in Miami, Mike served as a member of the City's Bicycle Action Committee, where he helped spearhead the creation of the city's first Bicycle Action Plan, and the formulation of a monthly open streets initiative, entitled Bike Miami Days. He currently serves on an Executive Committee for Transportation Alternatives—one of the country's leading active transportation advocacy organizations (based in New York City) and is an advisor to the Bicycle Coalition of Maine. Mike received a B.A. in American Cultural Studies from Bates College and a Masters in Urban Planning from the University of Michigan. Mike is a CNU-Accredited Professional. He encourages you to trade four wheels for two. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.47 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners MIKE LYDON, C N U-A 155 Water Street, Floor 2 I I Brooklyn, NY 11201 I mike @streetplans.org 11 917.767.9850 THE STREET PLANS COLLABORATIVE, PRINCIPAL I I BROOKLYN, NY I I APRIL 2009 - PRESENT • Trailnet Bicycle Commuting Awareness and Encouragement Media Campaign, St. Louis, MO • Streets for Everyone Guide, Trailnet, St. Louis, MO • Bicycle City Master Plan, Gaston, SC • Miami, FL 2030 Bicycle Master Plan • Miami, FL Bicycle Action Plan • Brighton Boulevard Context-Sensitive Plan and Technical Assistance, Denver, CO • The Open Streets Project, North America • Westminster, CO 2030 Bicycle Master Plan • El Paso, TX Plan El Paso Comprehensive Plan • Active Living Plan, Freeport, ME • PACTs- North of Portland, ME Bicycle and Pedestrian Implementation Plan • Tech Town Master Plan, Detroit, MI • Albemarle Regional Bicycle Master Plan, Albemarle 10-County Region, NC • Rio Grande Boulevard Corridor Plan, Albuquerque, NM • 5401 North Bikeway Plan, Raleigh, NC • Jean Lafitte, LA Town Resiliency Master Plan • Allentown, PA Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan • GrowSmart Rhode Island Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Trainings • City of Miami, FL Health District Pedestrian and Bicycle Study • SmartCode Bicycle Module Calibration and Handlebar Survey, Fitchburg, WI • Miami, FL Bicycle-Friendly Community Designation Application • Village of Pinecrest U.S. 1 Mobility Plan, Pinecrest, FL • Miami Beach, FL Bicycle Master Plan DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK AND COMPANY, URBAN PLANNER I I MIAMI, FL I I MAY 2006 — APRIL 2009 • Miami 21 Form-Based Code, Miami, FL • Cottonwood Mall Suburban Retrofit Master Plan, Holladay, UT • Federal City Base Redevelopment Plan, New Orleans, LA • Gulfport, MS Master Plan • Lifelong Communities Plan, Atlanta, GA GET DOWNTOWN PROGRAM, PROGRAM ASSISTANT I I ANN ARBOR, MI I I SEPT 2005 —APRIL 2006 • Assisted the Program Director with developing, coordinating and maintaining a bicycle, walking, and bus transportation program for the City of Ann Arbor. MASSACHUSETTS BICYCLE COALITION, DIRECTOR OF FUNDRAISING I I BOSTON, MA I I AUG 2004 — AUG 2005 • Oversaw all fundraising efforts for the only statewide non-profit bicycle education and advocacy organization in Massachusetts. EDUCATION + HONORS • Selected as one of thirty-four Next American City Urban Vanguard, 2009 • University of Michigan, Masters in Urban Planning, Physical Planning / Urban Design Concentration, 2007. • Co-President of the Urban Planning Student Association (UPSA) 2006-2007. • EDAW Inc., Transit-Oriented Development Research Fellow, November 2006 —August 2007 • CNU New Enaland Volunteer of the Year Award. 2005 2.48 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners JULIE FLYNN I I STREET PLANS PROJECT SUPPORT PROJECT ROLE: PLANNING AND DESIGN SUPPORT Julie Flynn will assist The Street Plans Collaborative team in research, public outreach, design and project management. Julie has a strong background in community outreach, as well as extensive experience with research and graphics production for urban planning projects. She is fluent in Spanish and can lead bilingual public involvement efforts. Julie worked with Street Plans Principal Mike Lydon to write and design Street Plans' newest research project, Mercado: Lessons from 20 Markets Across South America. Prior to joining Street Plans, Julie worked as a Transportation Planner and Public Involvement Specialist at Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates (HSH) in New York, NY.At HSH,Julie worked on an array of projects at the federal, state,and neighborhood level. She also coordinated the city-wide permit process for New York City's PARK(ing) Day event. Before joining HSH,Julie worked as the Communications and Program Associate at La Cocina, a non-profit organization in San Francisco, CA. While at La Cocina,Julie helped coordinate the 2nd Annual San Francisco Street Food Festival, and assisted in publicizing and planning the 1st National Street Food Conference, engaging food vendors and city planners alike in a dynamic two-day discussion on the impact of mobile food vending in urban settings across the country. Julie received a B.A. in Urban Studies from Brown University. JULIE FLYNN 4611 1 8TH ST., UNIT 3 I I SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 I I JULIE@STREETPLANS.ORG 11 860.539.8061 THE STREET PLANS COLLABORATIVE, PROJECT MANAGER I I 2013 - PRESENT • Berkeley Undergraduate Initiative Public Involvement Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA • Guide to Public Space Management and Stewardship, San Francisco, CA • West Haven Station TOD Plan Public Involvement, West Haven, CT • Market Street Prototyping Festival Public Involvement, San Francisco, CA • Village of Pinecrest U.S. 1 Mobility Plan, Pinecrest, FL • Miami Beach Atlantic Greenways Network Master Plan Update, Miami Beach, FL • Fairmount Station Placemaking Plan, Hyde Park, MA • Atlanta Regional Commission "Living Beyond Expectations" Demonstration Project, Atlanta, GA • Trailnet Streets For Everyone Guide, St. Louis, MO • Washington Gateway Main Street 1-93 "Tactical Urbanism" Underpass Placemaking Project, Boston , MA • North of Portland, ME Area Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Active Living Master Plan, Freeport, ME • Re-imagine Jay Street Community Safety Planning Workshop, Brooklyn, NY HOWARD/STEIN-HUDSON ASSOCIATES, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER, PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SPECIALIST I I NEW YORK, NY I I 2010— 2012 • Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 1-81 Challenge Public Participation Program • Greenpoint Manufacturing and Design Center Newtown Creek Brownfield Opportunity Area Nomination Study • New Jersey Institute of Technology Community Planning and Outreach: Mill Redevelopment Conferences • New York City Department of Transportation Sheridan Expressway Planning Study • National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Local Policies and Practices that Support Safe Pedestrian Environments Research Study • Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Rapid Transit Study-Hylan Boulevard Corridor Transportation Needs Assessment • U.S. Maritime Administration Panama Canal Expansion Study Listening Sessions EDUCATION + HONORS • Brown University, Bachelor of Arts, Urban Studies, 2008. • Pratt Institute, Brownfield Remediation Course, Fall 201 1. • New Leaders Council Fellowship for Political Entrepreneurship, 2010. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.49 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 ARCADIS Education WUR Wageningen University, The Netherlands: Piet Dircke -1982 BSc,Tropical Land& Water Management -1985 MSc,Water Management Years of Experience Mr. Dircke is ARCADIS'Global Leader for Water Management. He is a water an expert in water Total-30 years With ARCADIS-8 year(s) management by training with more than 30 years of experience in urban resiliency,flood protection,waterfront development and climate change adaptation. He is considered a leading Recent Positions global expert in these fields. Mr. Dircke has presented numerous times at major global Professor Rotterdam conferences,given hundreds of interviews to leading global magazines and papers(including University of Applied Sciences Rolling Stone, National Geographic, NY Times,Time magazine,Wall Street Journal, Der Stem), Chairman Board Flood Control and had about fifteen TV appearances including in the recent Emmy Award winning 2015 Foundation documentary on climate resiliency"The Years of Living Dangerously",directed by Arnold Scientific Board Member World Expo Rotterdam 2025 Schwarzenegger and James Cameron. Advisory Board Member Rotterdam Climate Proof Netherlands. In 2014, Mr. Dircke was a.reviewer of the Flood Safety Policy and Procedures of Advisory Board Member the Dutch Delta Program. He was a Professor in Urban Water Management at the Rotterdam Knowledge for Climate Program Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences,where his research at the RDM Campus focused on waterfront Steering Committee Member development,climate resiliency and multipurpose flood protection in delta cities. He is part'of Henry Hudson 2013,New Rotterdam's global climate resiliency ambitions as co-author and editor on three"Connecting York City Delta Cities"books,covering flood risk management and climate adaptation strategies in the Program Committee Member IWW Amsterdam 2013 Delta Cities of the C40 based CDC Network. Between 2009 and 2013 he was the Chairman of Program Committee Member Flood Control 2015,a€22 million program developing smart flood control systems. Conference"Deltas in Times of Climate Change" 2014, Rotterdam USA. Since Hurricane Katrina Mr. Dircke has been one of the major Dutch representatives in knowledge exchange between the Netherlands and the US on flood protection,water management and climate resiliency; particularly in Miami, New Orleans, San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York. In New Orleans, he assisted the US Army Corps of Engineers in providing hurricane protection and coordinated a team from the Netherlands for the Dutch Dialogues and the New Orleans Urban Water Plan. In San Francisco he is involved in a number of projects on sea level rise and water front development in the San Francisco Bay and the Bay Delta Area. In New York he was involved in the Rebuild by Design competition and works on a number of projects on community resiliency,flood protection and waterfront development in Manhattan and Brooklyn. Most recently, he participated in a workshop organized in partnership with Broward County, Miami-Dade County, and the City of Miami Beach to develop conceptual ideas that enhances resiliency in south Florida Southeast Asia.In 2012 he was heaving involved in preparing for the Master Plan Phase of the Jakarta Coastal Defense Strategy and also responsible for preparation of the Terms of Reference(TOR)establishing the intergovernmental Program Management Unit(PMU)for Jakarta. 2.50 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ARCAD1S ht,4struciure-Wat _ :N-...,: 8 ,.,as Piet Dircke In 2013 he was responsible for the preparation of the TOR of the Delta Plan 2100 for Bangladesh and accompanied the Dutch minister for Infrastructure and Environment on a historic state visit to Myanmar, launching a national IWRM Master Plan study for Myanmar. In Bangkok he supported preparation of a$10 billion Conceptual Plan for Flood Protection and Climate Adaptation for Thailand and Bangkok. Relevant Projects • 2014:Advisor on Climate resiliency strategies in San Francisco,for the SF Public Utilities Board and the Port Authority, on Adapting Mission bay to Rising Tides. • 2014: Member of the End of Project Review team for Master Plan NCICD National Capital Integrated Coastal Development,Jakarta's Giant Garuda shaped coastal urban development and flood protection. • 2013—2014:Advisor on the Feasibility Study for Manhattan Seaport City,a project combining land reclamation&multi-purpose flood protection. • 2013—2014:Advisor on the Ministry of HUD Rebuild by Design competition on the Big U, the winning project proposing multifunctional flood protection for Southern Manhattan. • 2009-2014: Leading the Brooklyn Rotterdam Waterfront Exchange, a US-Dutch public private program on developing community leadership&climate resiliency in Brooklyn South. Combining climate adaptation,education, innovation and sustainable urban waterfront development. Leading a team with Rotterdam partners RDM Campus and Rotterdam University, and NY partners Columbia University and Pratt Institute. • 2012—2013:Advisor and project director for the VERIZON flood protection program in downtown Manhattan, following the flooding of their offices caused by Hurricane Sandy. • 2012—2013: Preparation of the TOR for the Delta Plan 2100 for Bangladesh. He also accompanied the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100 delegation, headed by the Minister of Planning, Mr. Khandker,on their visit to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. • 2012—2013:Advisor for a Thai-Chinese contractor JV on the preparation a Conceptual Plan(more than 10 Billion US$)for Flood Protection and Climate Change Adaptation for Thailand and in particular Bangkok. • 2011 —2013: Advisor to the GNO Inc. New Orleans Urban Water Management Strategy, responsible for coordination of the Dutch team for this project. • 2011 —2012: "End of Project"review mission for the first phase JCDS Jakarta Coastal Defense Strategy,combining flood protection&land reclamation. Responsible for Project Definition and Terms of Reference for the Master Planning phase of the JCDS, as well as for the Intergovernmental Program Management Unit(PMU)that is planned to direct,and ultimately operate and maintain the future Jakarta Coastal Defense System. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.51 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ARCADES Infrastructure•muter Env ronmen .a."i!Q'nvs Education PhD(Candidate)Biological Sciences University of South Robert J Daoust Carolina MS Biological Sciences Florida International University 1998 • • BSc(Hons)Geography McGill University 1993 Mr. Daoust has substantial experience in the areas of coastal protection,ecological sciences Years of Experience Total-22 years and ecosystem restoration working for a variety of municipal and state agencies across Florida, With ARCADIS-7.5 years Georgia,and Louisiana. His recent work has focused on flood risk reduction associated with planning for extreme storm events, recurrent flooding,and sea level rise. His experience includes planning,permitting,and engineering support for large-and small-scale restoration projects with strong qualifications in coastal Louisiana, San Joaquin-Sacramento Bay-Delta,and the Florida Everglades. He has been highly engaged in climate change resiliency efforts in New York-New Jersey following Hurricane Sandy. He has been interviewed on sea level rise/ resiliency/climate change issues on south Florida by local and national media including radio and television,has participated on numerous regional panels discussing the issues,and presented to local Chambers of Commerce. Project Experience Port Authority of New York and New Jersey:Southwest Brooklyn Climate Change Adaptation Study/New York,NY. Managed a project analyzing innovative applications of dredge material to construct green infrastructure that will enhance the resiliency of southwest Brooklyn against scenarios of projected sea level rise/recurrent flooding. The study investigated off-shore,near-shore,and on-shore applications for dredge material. The off-shore application will utilize modified stainless steel gabion baskets containing geotextile bags filled dredge material to construct breakwater features at the 10-foot bathymetric contour line. An intertidal wetland constructed with geotextile bag foot and free placement of dredge material will be placed to provide additional resiliency in the near-shore environment. A multipurpose berm/levee constructed using a geotextile tube inner core will provide on-shore protection. The final recommendation selection specific application methods based on economic viability, construction methods, regulatory framework,and commercial availability. Confidential Client:Post-Sandy Flood Risk Reduction and Mitigation Study/New York, NY. Project manager for a project to develop a conceptual flood risk reduction plan for five major buildings in lower Manhattan that were substantially impacted by flooding during Hurricane Sandy. The project included a baseline assessment of flood damage;storm surge,wave and flood modeling to identify high risk features on each property;develop of preliminary conceptual plans and renderings for flood risk reduction solutions that mitigate risk on each property;and preparation of cost estimates and schedules for design and implementation of proposed flood risk reduction strategies. 2.52 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners D utmi 11 g (-AD ,,w,,.:,ure• :._ . r:.,.,.. _ Robert Daoust Confidential Client:Post-Sandy Flood Exterior Barrier Conceptual Design and Planning/ New York,NY. Managed a project to identify and design flood protection solutions for two large commercial properties adjacent to the Hudson River in lower Manhattan and Jersey City. The Scope of Work includes evaluation and review of local building codes and regulations in New York and New Jersey that have been,or will be,modified as a result of Hurricane Sandy; determination of required flood protection design height elevations to protect against 1 in 100 and 1 in 500 year storm events as well as accounting for sea level rise projections over the next 25 years;storm surge,wave,and 3-D computation fluid dynamics modeling to assess flood risks and identify highly vulnerable areas;development of conceptual design for flood protection systems;preparation of a Basis of Design Report and preliminary plans for specifications for flood protection systems;cost estimation of proposed protection systems;and calculations of installation times and storage requirements. Plaquemines Parish Government:Buras Restoration Project/Baton Rouge LA. Project manager for a project evaluating three distinct alternative uses of living shoreline near Joshua's Marine in Plaquemines Parish, LA.The shoreline in the area is highly fragmented causing marsh loss,shoreline destabilization, habitat loss,water quality impairment,and loss of recreational/sport fishing uses.The project is evaluating the use of three different types of living shorelines to address these issues. 1)placement of a Deltalok system,composed of geotextile bags that allow natural recruitment of shoreline species;2)a mixed-use living breakwater and 3) a breakwater using Hesco baskets that provide oyster habitat below MHW and are planted with emergent marsh vegetation at MHW. The goals of the project are to close off canals,created varied habitat,provide protection for the working marina,provide storm surge protection and improve recreational opportunities in the adjacent waters. Coastal Protection&Restoration Authority of Louisiana:Atchafalaya Basin Sediment Management Plan/Baton Rouge LA. Managed a project developing a comprehensive sediment management plan for the Atchafalaya Basin,the only region along the Louisiana coast that is currently experiencing land gain through deltaic formations where the Atchafalaya River and the Wax Lake Outlet enter Atchafalaya Bay on the Gulf Coast.The project includes three distinct phases.The first was the collection and review of all pertinent relevant sediment data currently available for the Atchafalaya Basin and analysis of these data to determine their quality for incorporation in the second phase,the calculation of a sediment budget for the entire basin. The sediment budget forms the foundation for the final phase,the development of the Sediment Management Plan,which will be used to determine how sediment is managed within the basin. Key considerations being examined for the sediment management plan are the supply,transport,and distribution of sediment delivered into and out of the Atchafalaya Basin and the best management practices that should be implemented to continue to encourage delivery of sediment to coastal regions further enhancing current deltaic building processes in the area. Responsible for the oversight of the technical team as well as all aspects of deliverable quality,and adherence to project budget and schedule. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.53 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Lewis Goodkin, CRE President and Chief Executive Officer— Goodkin Consulting Corporation Lewis Goodkin is widely recognized as one of the leading consultants in the real estate industry. Prior to founding his firm, Mr. Goodkin was President of the California based Sanford R. Goodkin Research Corporation (Peat Marwick/Goodkin Real Estate Consulting Group). During his 15-year tenure with SRGRC, Mr. Goodkin was responsible for the overall direction of the research and planning activities for the firm's 34 professionals. He also conducted major assignments overseas for U.S. merchant builders. Mr. Goodkin served as National Senior Consultant on Community Development to Arthur Andersen & Co. prior to establishing a National Strategic Alliance with Price Waterhouse LLP. Mr. Goodkin authored the highly acclaimed, When Real Estate and Home Building Becomes Big Business which was selected by the Library Journal as one of the year's best business books the year it was written, and was the subject of a special addendum in the New York Times financial section. In addition, he has written over 1,500 articles for the trade, business associations, newspapers and magazines. Currently, Mr. Goodkin is Contributing Editor-Real Estate for Florida Trend Magazine. Mr. Goodkin is a member of the National Association of Real Estate Editors and American Association of Travel Editors. He is regularly quoted in many major business publications and magazines for the trade. He has been a guest on both Good Morning America and The Today Show. Mr. Goodkin has lectured at UCLA, USC; UC Irvine, Rutgers, NYU-Extension Program, University of Florida, Georgia Tech, Harvard University and the Harvard Real Estate Club on urban land economics, real estate investment, development and marketing. He serves on the Real Estate Advisory Board of the University of Florida and the Advisory Board of the School of Design at the University of Florida and is a graduate of Temple University. Mr. Goodkin is past Chairman of the South Florida-Caribbean District Council of the Urban Land Institute and Past Chairman of the South Florida-Caribbean Chapter of the American Society of Real Estate Counselors (CRE), a member of the Urban Land Institute and serves as Assistant Chairman-Community Development Council. He is a designated member of the Institute of Residential Marketing and Lambda Alpha International (an honorary land economics society). He served as a Director of Barnett Bank of South Florida and a Founding Director of Barnett Bank of Broward County. He also serves on the Advisory Board of the National Real Estate Index, the American Association of Business Economists. Mr. Goodkin serves as co- chairman of the University of Florida's annual Economics and Development Symposium. Goodkin's extensive network of contracts in the real estate and financial communities has enabled him to help clients develop mutually beneficial business and financial relationships. Goodkin©© D{ T Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries 2.54 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Jack Winston, Principal - Goodkin Consulting Jack Winston holds a Bachelor of Architecture from Pratt Institute in New York, a Master's in Business Administration and a Masters in Urban & Regional Planning from the University of Miami. He has practiced architecture as well as having his own residential building company in New York. Jack Winston has held senior management positions with the largest home builders in the world...Levitt & Sons, Larwin, as well as the real estate development firms of Triangle Pacific (NYSE), and GAC. He has owned one of the largest home building companies in the Miami area and is a nationally known real estate expert. Mr. Winston has been a Principal with Goodkin Consulting, a nationally recognized leader in the real estate consulting field, for the past 15 years. During that time, he has conducted research and feasibility studies and development analyses for some of the nation's larger real estate firms, investment banks, REITs, institutional lenders and municipalities, all on a local and national level. His expertise in this field has been cited by the New York Times, Washington Post, Fortune and Business Week magazines, and he has appeared on PBS, 20-20 and Nightline. His thirty years of experience in the real estate development field and his wide range of involvement in complex projects all over the country have truly made him one of the most knowledgeable people in his field. Mr. Winston is a member of the National Association of Home Builders, and the Builders' Association of South Florida where he was Chairman of the Construction Committee and the Dade County Codes Committee. He is also a member of the Urban Land Institute, the American Institute of Architects, the Governor's Task Force on Urban Growth, the American Planning Association, and the Institute of Residential Marketing. Mr. Winston was a grant recipient of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy for his work on "The Urban Village." He received one of the top ten buildings in steel awards presented by the Bethlehem Steel Company for his designs and the innovative design award in concrete presented by the Portland Cement Association. He was a recipient of a research grant from the United Cerebral Palsy Foundation for his book Concepts of Residential Care:An Architectural Guide. Mr. Winston has lectured at the National Convention of the Multi-Housing Institute, the Convention of the National Association of Home Builders, the State Convention of New York State Home Builders Association, the State Convention of the American Planning Association, the Massachusetts Regional Planning Council, and the South Florida Growth Management Conference. Mr. Winston is an adjunct professor of real estate development and planning at the School of Architecture and at the Law School of the University of Miami. He has been a visiting professor to the Department of Urban and Regional Studies at FAU's Joint Center for Urban Studies and in the Master's Program of the School of Architecture at F.I.U. He has also been an instructor for the Department of Building Construction at the State University of New York. Mr. Winston has received licenses from the State of Florida as a State General Contractor, Real Estate Broker and Community Association Manager, and is a certified land planner. Goodkinc© r o Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.55 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Frank Pallini, Senior Analyst - Goodkin Consulting Frank Pallini has been with Goodkin Consulting since 2000. Mr. Pallini has over 20 years of professional experience as a management consultant to the real estate industry. His area of expertise covers residential and commercial development, including market and financial analyses, development/project planning, strategic planning, asset evaluation, disposition/acquisition; economic research and impact analysis. Mr. Pallini has served as management consultant and business advisor to numerous real estate companies, developers, builders, financial institutions, investors and asset managers as well as units of government and non-profit organizations. Major clients have included Disney Development, USAA Real Estate, GE Capital, US Home, Beneficial, and Citicorp Real Estate, Opus Residential, Rottlund Homes, Ginsburg Development, and WCI Communities. He has also served as project manager/lead consultant for numerous public/private sector projects including: City of Hollywood, downtown redevelopment, City of Boynton Beach downtown redevelopment, City of St. Petersburg Housing Needs Assessment, sponsored by the St. Petersburg Chamber of Commerce; the City of Key West, to study the impact of the vacation rental market on the local economy; Hillsborough County Master Facilities Plan; and, as technical advisor to the City of Tampa's Cultural Arts District Committee. Prior to joining Goodkin, Mr. Pallini served ten years with KPMG Peat Marwick's Real Estate Management Consulting Group. During his tenure with KPMG, Frank advanced to level of Senior Manager where he was director of the firm's southeast real estate management consulting practice. In this capacity he was responsible for all phases of practice development, and provided management consulting expertise to clients throughout the United States, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. Mr. Pallini has written several articles covering regional real estate industry trends for the Urban Land Institute, the Real Estate Review, published by Warren, Gorham and Lamont and numerous local publications covering real estate business and trends in Florida. Frank obtained his Bachelor's degree from Eckerd College and completed graduate course work for the Master's Program in Community Development at Southern Illinois University. He also has completed continuing education and enrichment courses in real estate finance from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. GOOdkin Advisors to the Real Estate and Financial Industries 2.56 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl dz Partners MI MN i/ .111=PX Jorge Kuperman,AIA,NCARB is a Register Architect in the state of Florida and Tex- as,a Licensed General Contractor and a Realtor, as such; he practices Architecture with a practical, realistic and market sensitive approach. He has over 31 years of experience in the planning, design, and construction of several building types with a particular expertise in aviation facilities and institutional projects. He is the managing principal of JSK Architectural Group,will serve as the Project Director, and will be your primary point of contact. Mr. Kuperman has effectively organized multi disciplinary teams to work on important projects such as the restoration Hale Sofge Towers,an affordable housing complex. The exterior repairs to Cargo Build- ing 716 at MIA Cargo City and the restoration of the Old City Hall at the City of Opa Locka. Jorge Kuperman,A!A Principal Architect 1982 -Present JSK Architectural Group: Principal and Director of Design and Construction of a Professional organization offering services in the areas of Architec Professional Qualifications: ture-Engineering, Interior Design and Construction Management for a large numbe Florida Registered Architect Texas Registered Architect and type of building owners. Certified by NCARB Florida Types of clients are diverse and includes both the Government and Private sectors Certified General Contractor in areas of Architecture-Engineering and design-build of new facilities as well as Florida Real Estate Salesperson research,analysis and development for the betterment of existing facilities. Educational Background: 2003-2005: Local Architect of Lender's Quality Assurance,a National quality assur M.A.in Architecture and Urban Design ance company based in Tempe,Az., representing major lenders in the construction National University industry in budget control on multimillion dollar local projects such as Mary Brickell Buenos Aires Village and Metropolis Condominium. Construction Head Master,National School of Technical Education Buenos Aires. 1999-2005: Corporate Facilities Architect for Avis and Budget Rent a Car within th southeastern states and Corporate locations throughout Latin America, (Argentina, Professional Experience: Brazil, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands),with a total of 50 airport locations and off air Thirty,(30)years of diversified experience port at major cities,with a large number of projects being managed simultaneously both as an Architect and as a General In general responsibilities included the whole instrumentation of projects including Contractor. Jorge's experience includes design,awarding and management of construction working with Property Owners,Facility In addition dealing with code issues,security and safety related to Airports and Managers,Engineers,Architects, different Government Agencies and Airport Authorities in aspects of permitting General Contractors and Trades directing process and jurisdictions. and supervising the design and the construction phases of a diversified number of building types. Acting as the Corporate Facilities representative before these authorities,represent ing the Company as an integral party to several Technical Committees for Airport Significant Projects: Development Projects for the design and construction of Consolidated Facilities for Rental Car Center at MIA the whole Industry for the expansion and improvement of existing facilities. Inter- MDAD Cargo Building 716 acting with the Company's properties department in order to assess,determine an( Booklink at MIA advice them in areas of concession and leases. Juan Valdez Cafe at MIA Newslink at MIA Air Essentials at MIA MEMBERSHIP TO PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS Subway at MIA Current Board Member of the Business Improvement District, City of Coral Gables. Jackson North Community Hospital Jackson South Community Hospital Current Board Member of the Historic and Environmental Board,City of Miami. Miami Dade West Regional Library Past member of the Planning Board,City of Miami Beach. Miami Dade Cultural Art Center Past President of the Miami Chapter of the AIA,American Institute of Architects. City Hall of Opa Locka Past Vice President of the Venetian Islands Homeowners Association Consolidated Rental car facilities in Past Member Architecture Committee member for instrumentation of the Geo Atlanta,GA,Ft.Lauderdale and Ft.Myers. Bond for the beautification of Venetian Islands Past Board Member of the Miami Beach, North Shore Youth Center Committee. Past Member Board of Directors of the Miami Dade County Empowerment Trust. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.57 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 NMI I LAP' 1111110PNA PROFILE Ellen Uguccioni has amassed over 30 years of experience in the Historic Preserva- tion field.She has held several key positions over the years,and been associated with numerous City departments.She has coauthored several publications,has been published in a vast number of periodicals,and has been a featured speaker al many Historic Preservation events all around the Country. Ms. Uguccioni has written and lectured extensively about historic preservation to local,state,and national audiences. She has served three terms on the Florida • National Register Review Board as the architectural historian member. Her many =_ awards include:the Distinguished Service Award from the Florida Trust for Historic Preservation, the distinguished service award from The Villagers, Inc.; Excellence in Writing about Architecture from the Miami Chapter of the . - American Institute of Architects; National History Medal from the Coral Gables _ Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution,and the Lifetime Achieve• ment Award from the Dade Heritage Trust for Historic Preservation. Ellen J. Uguccioni Director, Historic Preservation Dept. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE City of Coral Gables,Florida • University of Miami,School of Architecture-Adjunct Faculty PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: • 1990-1999 Coral gables, FL • Historic Preservation Officer Florida National Register Review Board,Architectural Historian City of Miami,Florida • 1986-1990, 1991-1995,and 1997-1999 • Historic Preservation Planner • Florida Secretary of State Appointment City of Miami • Florida Historic Preservation Planner Florida Historical Commission, January 2002-June 2004 Janus Research • Architectural Historian member, Florida •Sr.Planner,Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach, Florida Secretary of State Appointment,Vice-Chairman •Cultural Resources Advisor • National Register Review Board 2003-2004 City of Coral Gables,Florida • Director,Historic Preservation Dept. Florida Historical Commission, Architectural Historian Member City of Coral Gables,Florida • October 2004-September 2011,Appointed by the Honorable Governor John Ellis"Jeb" Bush EDUCATION: Trustee,the Florida Trust for Historic Preservation B.A.Art History • Statewide not-for-profit Historic Preservation organization University of Hartford • 2001-2007.2008-2012 M.A.Art History University of Missouri Kansas City 2.58 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners N MEW' PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: March 2011-TAI Hospitality Design Group-Miami,FL Hospitality Design,Architecture and Interior Design Projects. Architect/Interior Architect/Project Manager • Beck Residence, Miami Beach, FL • Developed exterior additions, infinity edge pool, interior renovations, space planning,furniture and finish selections.Coordinated with GC and Ownei • Casablanca Restaurant, Fort Lauderdale, FL • Developed interior renovations, space planning, furniture and finish Anthony Freedman,Assoc.AIA selections.Coordinated with GC and Owner. Project Manager • Gropman Residence, Miami Beach, FL • Developed exterior and interior renovations,space planning,furniture and Professional Affiliations: finish selections.Coordinated with GC and Owner. NCARB • Allison Road Residence, Miami Beach, FL AIA Member • Developed exterior and interior renovations,space planning,furniture and finish selections and new infinity edge pool. Coordinated with GC,and Education: subcontractors. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Feb 2010-Joseph B. Kaller&Associates,PA-Hollywood,FL Alexandria,Virginia Residential,Commercial Renovation and Violation Resolution Projects. Masters Degree Project Architect/Interior Architect -Graduated with Honors • Steve Madden-Shoe Outlet,Sawgrass Mills Mall • Developed and coordinated construction documents for building permit. Florida Agricultural & Coordinated with Simon Malls Management, Design Architect and Building Mechanical University(FAMU), Dept. Tallahassee, Florida • Sunshine State Academy, Hollywood, FL Bachelors of Science in Architecture • Change of use-from existing church to day care facility for children. -Graduated Cum Laude • Designed space plan to accommodate for new classroom and building code requirements. Developed demolition,and construction documents for approve, Miami-Dade College permit. Coordinated with owner, building department and general contractor. Miami, Florida • IC Realtime, Inc., Pompano Beach, FL Associate of Arts in Architecture • Warehouse conversion for additional office space needs. • Designed space plan to accommodate for change of use and to meet required Building Code Experience: building code requirements. Developed demolition,and construction 2010 Florida Building Code(FBC) documents for approved permit.Coordinated with owner, building department NFPA 2010 • Jump and Gym, Hollywood, FL ADA 2010 • Vanilla shell conversion into a recreation and activity center for children. Designed space plan to accommodate owner's occupancy and equipment Certifications: needs. Developed demolition,and construction documents for approved Disaster Relief Housing Inspector permit. PARR Inspections for FEMA • Harrison Street Beer Pub, Hollywood, FL License No.42827-Florida • Vanilla shell conversion into a beer and wine drinking establishment. • Designed space plan to accommodate owner's equipment needs and building code requirements. Developed construction documents for approved permit. • Rosen Residence, Pembroke Pines, FL • Home addition and renovation. Produced construction documents for an approved permit.Coordinated with owner,structural engineer and general contractor. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.59 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners --� Ii1111=1"‘ PROFILE Over six years of experience in the architectural field and construction field. Vivian; i is instrumental in the initial conceptual design of the residential prototype with an emphasis in presenting both tridimensional electronic models and conceptual floor plans and elevations. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE JSK Architectural Group-Ass. Project Manager,May 2011-Present Viviana Correa,Assoc.AIA • Responsible for the production of construction documents,as well as Assistant Project Manager Construction Administration. • Develops tridimensional electronic models Professional Affiliations: • Primary contact between Building Department and our team during the NCARB approval process. AIA Member • Designs,creates,and submits RFP's and RFQ's for city,county,and school board projects. Education: • Attends Pre-Proposal Meeting Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL Simja Enterprises-Ass. Project Manager,Aug.2009-May 2011 Prof.Bachelors of Architecture Bachelors of Business Admin. • Responsible for production of construction documents. December 2009 • Assisted in the construction management of all projects. • Produced and responded to RFI's in a timely manner. Building Code Experience: • Submitted change orders and invoices when necessary. 2010 Florida Building Code(FBC) • Estimated a number of projects totaling over 3 million dollars NFPA 2010 • Requested at least 3 estimates per trade ADA 2010 • Estimated multi-story residential properties,restaurants,interior build-outs warehouses,Jewish Temples,etc. Tamara Peacock-Assistant Project Manager,Aug.2008-Aug.2009 • Developed Schematic Design Drawings, Design Development Drawings, and Construction Documents for residential, commercial,and government projects • Created Specification Manuals for governmental and LEED Certified projects • Created and coordinated Mechanical, Electrical,and Plumbing Documents • In charge of permitting for residential,commercial,and government projects • Planned and coordinated team projects QUALIFICATIONS • Proficient with Autodesk AutoCAD,Autodesk Revit Architecture,Google SketchUp, Microsoft Office and Adobe CS4 • RFP and RFQ submittals • Client Presentations • Code Research • Fluent in both English and Spanish 2.60 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners Cristobal A Betancourt, RLA Mr.Betancourt is Chen Moore and Associates'Director of Landscape Architecture Director of Planning and and Planning. He has experience providing planning and landscape architecture design solutions for public and private sector clients. Mr.Betancourt provides a full Landscape Architecture g P P � P range of services starting with due diligence and master planning culminating in Education detailed site design. He is well versed in the use of low-impact development ar 3�. Bachelor of Science,Landscape techniques applied to site planning. Architecture,Cornell University, 1995 Project Experience City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project.CMA is responsible for ,, s'`T Registration providing surveying,planning,g eotechnical investigation,design,permitting, Registered Landscape preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering Architect,Florida,LA6666941, and inspection(CEI)services for infrastructure improvements within the public right- 2008 of-way(ROW)areas of the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project , Registered Landscape encompasses approximately 24,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements Architect,New Jersey, including:8,700 LF of 8-inch water main replacements;sewer improvements, AAoo0949,2006 stormwater drainage improvements;paving&grading;roadway/traffic , Registered Landscape improvements(streets,sidewalks,curb and gutter,drainage,traffic control devices Architect,New York,001959, including striping,signing and channelization);streetscaping and landscaping 4:, 2005 enhancements;decorative,landscape and roadway lighting improvements;and roadway reconstruction.This project is currently under construction with CMA Professional Affiliations providing construction administration services,on-site field observation,and CEI American Planning Association services. American Society of Landscape South Pointe Phase III/IVJV-Right-of-Way Improvement Project.CMA is responsible Architects for providing surveying,planning,geotechnical investigation,design,permitting, East Stuart Main Street Design preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering Committee and inspection services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the South Pointe III/IV/V neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project Florida Recreation and Park encompasses approximately 19,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements Association including 9,300 LF 8"water main replacements,stormwater drainage improvements, paving&grading,streetscaping enhancements,landscaping improvements,lighting FloridaNetwork of Research, improvements,and roadway reconstruction. Additionally,due to existing listed Science,and Technology Parks contaminated sites within the proximity of the right of way improvements, International Society of environmental coordination including contaminated sites analysis and consideration Arboriculture of the radius of influence was necessary for coordinating dewatering operations. Martin County Overall Euclid Streetscape Improvements(Lincoln Center Building).Chen Moore and Extension Advisory Committee Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture services for the pedestrianizing of Euclid Avenue between Lincoln Road and Lincoln Lane in the City National Association of Industrial and Office Parks of Miami Beach.This stretch of road will be incorporated into the historic pedestrian street known as Lincoln Road Mall.The project is funded by the City of Miami Beach Urban Land Institute through a developer's agreement with Lincoln Center Associates which owns the retail building at the intersection of Euclid Avenue with Lincoln Road.The project Certifications requires coordination with various agencies including the City of Miami Beach Council of Landscape Planning Department,Public Works,Greenspace management,and Capital Architectural Registration Improvements,as well as Miami-Dade County Environmental Protection,Traffic,and Board Utilities.The scope of work includes providing site design and permitting including layout,hardscape,landscaping,lighting,drainage,and utilities. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.61 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Jose Luis Acosta, PE Mr.Acosta has over 15 years of design and project management experience ��,, Vice President of Business i',^ F in various industries,including municipal continuing service contracts,K-12 Development ,''' education,higher education,healthcare transportation,ortation and `'" commercial/residential/industrial private development. His background `;. Education includes neighborhood improvement projects,streetscape enhancements, ,' Masters of Business •'`'' utility relocation,on-and off-site infrastructure design,bidding assistance Administration,Master of and construction administration services for several municipalities e l Business Administration, throughout Miami-Dade Broward and Palm Beach Counties. • Auburn University,2003 •b ti` Bachelor of Science,Civil • • Project Experience Engineering,University of , City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project.Chen Moore and ;t Miami,1999 f.'• Associates is responsible for providing surveying,planning,geotechnical :4f, Bachelor of Science, investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction documents, Architectural Engineering, ;,' bid and award and construction engineering and inspection(CEI)services for ;. University of Miami,1999 ;' i infrastructure improvements within the public right-of-way(ROW)areas of the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses ,, Registration approximately 24,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including: ;' Professional Engineer, 8,700 LF of 8-inch water main replacements;sewer improvements, Florida,63827,2004 : Gregory A Mendez, PE Mr.Mendez has more than 15 years of civil engineering experience in site Senior Project Manager and infrastructural development type projects for public and private x ' facilities. He has extensive utilities design experience and is also very Education experienced with fast track projects. His experience includes water, Bachelor of Engineering, drainage and sewer designs,design reviews,managing designs and Architectural Engineering, construction budgets,managing field inspection staff and managing client University of Miami,1998 relations. Registration Project Experience Professional Engineer, Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3&4 ROW Improvement Program.Chen Moore Florida,64718,2006 . and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture for the utility infrastructure and roadway reconstruction of two islands(Sunset Professional Affiliations Islands 3 and 4)off the Miami Beach west coast,along the inter-coastal N/A waterway.The project was publicly bid as a design-build and funded by the City of Miami Beach.The project consists of the replacement of 8"potable Certifications . . N/A water mains,the lining of existing sanitary sewer mains,a completely new storm water drainage system,including discharge pumps and outfalls,the undergrounding of all existing overhead utilities,new service connections to all properties,complete roadway reconstruction and grading with new pavement section and curb,landscaping,signage and striping. East Bird Rd Corridor Sanitary Sewer Improvement.Chen Moore and Associates(CMA)is providing civil engineering services for sewer ,'; improvements along the corridor of Bird Road(SW 40th Street)from Red Road(SW 57th Avenue)and Ludlam(SW 67th Avenue)within the commercial corridor(Exhibit A)on both sides of the street utilizing low pressure sewer design concepts. The project intends to connect various small commercial sites on both sides of the Bird Road Corridor as well as the shopping center at the NW corner of Red Road and Bird Road and nearby David Fairchild Elementary School. The project includes an initial engineering analysis phase with the preparation of a technical memorandum with options and recommendations for pump strategy,small and large pump station selection,power,maintenance,permitting considerations,etc. Post approval of the concept,the project includes 3o%,7o%,9o%,and 100% submittals,government permitting coordination,bidding services and • limited construction services addressing and design low pressure force main and pump stations and necessary design and specifications for the school and shopping center noted and a standard design to assist the connection of the smaller offices. MDWASD PSIP#0356 Improvement.Pump Station(PS)0356 is a wet well pump station and is located in a mainly residential area.Chen Moore and Associates is responsible for the design criteria to upgrade Pump Station 0356 to obtain a Miami Dade RER permit to carry out the project.The upgrade consisting of the installation of two(2)new submersible pumps in a new 8-foot inside diameter wet well with a minimum of 1-foot increase in depth will bring PS 0356 into compliance with the peak flow and Consent Decree regulations. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.63 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Patrick D Kaimrajh, PE Mr.Kaimrajh has six years of experience in civil engineering design,drafting, Senior Engineer permitting and construction inspection. His design experience includes paving,drainage and stormwater management. He has prepared Education engineering drawings,cost evaluations,design reports and various permit Master of Science,Civil applications.In addition,Mr. Kaimrajh has performed construction Engineering,North Carolina inspections for drainage installations and assisted in soil sampling activities. State University,Raleigh, 2013 Project Experience Bachelor of Science,Civil City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project.Chen Moore and ?4.. Engineering,University of Associates is responsible for providing surveying,planning,geotechnical Miami,2010 investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction documents, bid and award and construction engineering and inspection(CEI)services for Registration infrastructure improvements within the public right-of-way(ROW)areas of Professional Engineer, the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses Florida,78535,2015 approximately 24,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including: 8,700 LF of 8-inch water main replacements;sewer improvements, Professional Affiliations stormwater drainage improvements;paving&grading;roadway/traffic American Society of Civil improvements(streets,sidewalks,curb and gutter,drainage,traffic control Engineers devices including striping,signing and channelization);streetscaping and American Society of Civil landscaping enhancements;decorative,landscape and roadway lighting Engineers improvements;and roadway reconstruction.This project is currently under construction with CMA providing construction administration services,on- American Water Works site field observation,and CEI services. Association South Pointe Phase III/IV/V-Right-of-Way Improvement Project.Chen Certifications Moore and Associates is responsible for providing surveying,planning, N/A geotechnical investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering and inspection services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the South Pointe III/IV/V neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses approximately 19,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including 9,300 LF 8"water main replacements,stormwater drainage improvements,paving&grading,streetscaping enhancements,landscaping improvements,lighting improvements,and roadway reconstruction. Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3&4 ROW Improvement Program.Chen Moore • and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture for the utility infrastructure and roadway reconstruction of two islands(Sunset Islands 3 and 4)off the Miami Beach west coast,along the inter-coastal waterway.The project was publicly bid as a design-build and funded by the City of Miami Beach.The project consists of the replacement of 8"potable water mains,the lining of existing sanitary sewer mains,a completely new storm water drainage system,including discharge pumps and outfalls,the undergrounding of all existing overhead utilities,new service connections to all properties,complete roadway reconstruction and grading with new pavement section and curb,landscaping,signage and striping. 2.64 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners I I , I , I I , •■ TAB 23 SIMILAR EXPERIENCE • • 2 . 3 SIMILAR EXPERIENCE 2.3.1 EXPERIENCE WITH LARGE-SCALE (100,000 SF) 2.3.2 EXPERIENCE WITH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE-FRIENDLY PROJECTS THAT INCORPORATED COMMERCIAL, RESIDEN- TRANSIT ORIENTED PROJECTS AND EXAMPLES OF PAST TIAL AND/OR INSTITUTIONAL USES IN A COMPLEX AND SUCCESSES IN PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS. DENSE URBAN SETTING. Central to the philosophy of the DKP team is a focus on Dover, Kohl & Partners has worked to revitalize historic compact, walkable urbanism that is the primary element Downtowns and historic places for over 25 years and the of Transit Oriented Development. While most people majority of projects involved planning for over 100,000 think transportation infrastructure is mostly about high- square feet and the incorporation of commercial, resi- ways and streets, we see buildings, and their relationship dential,and institutional uses in complex,compact, urban to the street, as fundamental parts of a transportation settings. network.Working together with national experts in bicy- cle and pedestrian planning, Street Plans Collaborative, One example of a local, fully built place that we planned our team is known for advancing innovative practices for and coded is Downtown Kendall, in Miami-Dade County. a range of public, private, and non-profit sector groups. The plan transformed the heart of Kendall into a walkable, mixed-use downtown. New growth has been directed Among our most successful Transit Oriented toward achieving a coherent fabric of retail, office, hotel, Development projects were the award winning Plan El residential and entertainment facilities. Major streets Paso Comprehensive Plan and Connecting El Paso Transit have been enhanced with colonnaded sidewalks and trees Oriented Development Plans. These projects involved in the medians. working together with city staff and non-profit partners in the community to plan for existing and new neigh- Another relevant project was the Jupiter Waterfront borhoods around El Paso's new bus rapid transit system. Quarter in Jupiter, Florida. If you have visited Jupiter While these projects focused on city-wide efforts, local recently you recognize the difference. The plan involved neighborhood plans were also created for nodes and 364,000 square feet of mixed uses, about two-thirds in corridors around the city. These individual efforts mirror residential with 79,000 square feet of shops and restau- closely the scale and fine grained urbanism that one finds rants and 38,000 square feet of offices. in North Miami Beach. Another successful project involving a diversity of uses Through the Seven50 Plan process Dover-Kohl also drew was the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine the first design for a TOD at the Cypress Creek TriRail Campus which has become the center of an entire well- Station in Fort Lauderdale and plan finalization is cur- ness district. rently underway.Our plans for Arlington,Virginia;El Paso, Texas and Ocean Springs, Mississippi all helped to get federal and state funding for streetcars, bus rapid transit and rubber trolley circulator trolleys in those communi- :1 ties by demonstrating a commitment to transit oriented _ development. However, it is not an overstatement to say that TOD is part of every one of our projects. 4e111V ' %tea Jupiter Waterfront Cypress Creek TriRail Station RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.65 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 2.3.3 EXPERIENCE IN ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT PRO- 2.3.4 FAMILIARITY AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE LOCAL GRAMS FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS THAT HAVE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CLIMATE AND REAL ESTATE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENTED. MARKETS. South Miami and the Hometown Plan included a specific Half of Dover-Kohl's clients are private-sector develop- development plan and multiple private-public partner- ers (though never in the same municipality at the same ships.The effort was initiated by a local non-profit,South time).We understand both points of view. In the greater Miami Hometown, Inc.based on charrettes led by Dover- Miami area we have worked with many developers and Kohl. The implementation strategy stressed model proj- understand the regional development climate and real ects intended to demonstrate plan principles. estate markets. The first demonstration project was the redesign of Dorn In North Miami Beach, long-term economic sustainability Ave into a festival street that was narrowed,laid with cob- means finding a balance amongst the various goals of the blestone pavers, benches and street trees and now hosts plan. In practice this means that the plan must work for a variety of on-street dining and shopping.Other projects the people who live and work in North Miami Beach while involved the creation of municipal parking garages and also addressing the needs of business and tourism. Dover-Kohl worked on that aspect of the project well into plan implementation as a local Chamber of Commerce Achieving balance in land use and transportation through member. an economically sustainable mix of uses is critical to this effort.The plan may propose programs based upon creat- Our office is located in South Miami and we now work ing a mix of housing, employment space, and retail and toward plan implementation as a local business and as entertainment uses that serve local interests, capture residents. Seeing is believing and the best way to under- local markets, and create a complete and, to the extent stand our work in South Miami and the private-public possible,self-sufficient community that is livable and eco- partnerships we helped create is to watch our short film nomically attractive for business.This mix will also address on the topic: http://youtu.be/3JGOk56PuP4 uses that support and extend the tourism potential of the study area. 2.3.5 PAST SUCCESSES IN DEALING WITH ELECTED OFFI- CIALS, COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEES AND/OR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESSES AND RESIDENTS. We have over 25 years of experience with elected offi- cials, community advisory committees and neighborhood businesses and residents across the world. It is also worth noting that Dover-Kohl staff are all of these things also in their respective Greater Miami communities. We are, or : have been elected officials,community advisory commit- tee members,and neighborhood businesses and residents that have participated in bettering our neighborhoods tl through various planning processes.This helps us see both t _ sides of view. • The approach outlined in this RFQ response is a starting point for the specific series of tasks to be developed in conjunction with the Dover-Kohl team and City of Miami Beach staff.The specifics of the approach will be tailored with City staff beginning with the Project Kick-off when Dorn Avenue, South Miami 2.66 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners further details of the process can be discussed and the 2.3.] SKILL AND EXPERIENCE IN DESIGNING PUBLIC OPEN best approach for North Miami Beach determined. The SPACES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE SENSE OF COMMUNITY best way to tailor an approach is always to work closely AND PLACE. with,and learn from,the local experts.We will rely on City Staff to help us determine who we need to talk to and who All of our projects involve planning for open spaces with we need to stay involved with throughout the process. a distinct sense of place. Let us mention three different kinds of projects,successfully implemented,and including a park,a street, and a plaza. 2.3.6 EXPERIENCE WI ADAPTIVE REUSE AND HISTORIC As far as open green spaces we worked on the original PRESERVATION. designs for Bicentennial Park in Downtown Miami. The park consists of a total of approximately 30+ acres of Our team has many years of experience in historic preser- City-owned upland. It includes approximately 2,600 feet vation and reuse.JSK Architecture Group worked on icon- of Biscayne Baywalk and FEC (Florida East Coast Railway) is Southeast Florida landmarks like St. Patrick Church in slip walkway with views of downtown Miami, the Port of Miami Beach; Temple House in Miami Beach; Opa Locka Miami and Watson Island. The Miami City Commission City Hall, Thompson Fish House in Key West; the Coral created the advisory Bicentennial Park/Waterfront Gables Mansion built as part of the Biltmore complex in Renewal Committee and, in conjunction with the City's the Gables;and Huntington Building in Downtown Miami Planning Department, hired Dover, Kohl SE Partners to to name a few. Each of these structures were preserved propose three options for the Park based on public input and reused and their ultimate survival was linked to large- during the Bicentennial Park Charrette. The design team municipal programs involving transfers of development led by Cooper, Robertson ex Partners was chosen to design rights,tax credits, and historic preservation ordinances. the park and to site and prepare planning guidelines for the two museums. At the same time Dover-Kohl's plans use historic pres- ervation as an economic development tool. We work to preserve the priceless structures of the past and turn them into productive centers for our time. s fir. sY- ; e.4," _ 7,1t, 4,.,,, , 771-1: — ---- - 'tr ;,��:sacn � . J, 4yft z ter` x a , // � � / :,' �� _� ,y jam/ / Y Opa Locka City HaII Bicentennial Park, Initial Concept Plan RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.67 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 I Streets are important public open spaces. Perhaps one 2.3.8 SKILL AND EXPERIENCE DESIGNING STRUCTURED of Dover, Kohl St Partners' most noted example of open PARKING THAT DOES NOT DETRACT FROM URBAN VITALITY space design is to be found along Park Avenue in Winter AND DESIGN CONTEXT. Park just outside of Orlando. Park Avenue is the premier street in the midst of metropolitan Orlando. The design- Parking demand and supply management are important ers' task was to craft a quiet, elegant upgrade that felt components in economic development. As large surface authentic to the historic street and was implemented with lots redevelop into more productive land uses, managing minimal disruption. potentially-increased parking demand with reduced sup- ply will become a challenge. Reducing the frequency of In terms of plaza design, in Montgomery, Alabama we vehicle trips(especially drive-alone trips)and incentivizing designed One Court Square and the redesign of Court walking, biking, and transit use through well-designed Square Plaza was completed in 2007 and involved the mixed-use development will be valuable strategies. redevelopment of the plaza back to its historic pre-1950s configuration as a walkable, destination public space. In other words, we will demonstrate how land use and urban design influence travel behavior and parking demand. When parking garages are warranted they must be designed with care. Parking garages cannot detract from urban vitality and livability. This is a specialty of our firm. Urban parking is part of almost every one of our proj- ects and we look forward to discussing the urban design options with you. y ors" , ,„ ....0:4 s......_.. i i. ' ::,-, ....,. 0 , ,, ,. ,1111 „ _., ,,,,,..,_ ,,,,_,,,,,,_ *,---6 X # ,.-V _'' 1:7°5_, Nte,\\ 1 i Park Avenue,Winter Park, FL Court Square, Montgomery,AL 2.68 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners I 2.3.9 URBAN DESIGN AND MASTER PLANNING SKILLS, attendance provided you make announcements through ALONG WITH THE PROVEN ABILITY TO CREATE A SENSE OF the usual channels. COMMUNITY AND PLACE,AS WELL AS EMBRACING THE EXIST- On the other hand,the vast majority of the community can- ING ECLECTIC ELEMENTS THAT HELPS TO DEFINE AN AREA. not be expected to follow a traditional planning process Eclectic places should not be re-zoned or re-planned out to any great degree. Our charrettes provide an innovative of their uniqueness.From Cocoa Beach in Brevard County approach, and variety of outreach methods, to reach a greater segment of the community and recruit some new to Bradenton, Florida; from Downtown Cape Coral to Downtown Davie;from Sarasota to Fort Pierce with stops participants into the process. in Fort Myers, Winter Garden, the Lake Okeechobee region,and Homestead we have planned some of Florida's most unique and eclectic places. 2.3.1 1 DEMONSTRATED SUCCESS IN EMBRACING AND IMPLEMENTING THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF SUSTAIN- We work to define uniqueness, we protect and enhance existing features, and we respect and embrace every ABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY. place's specific identity. Each of the places we've listed Dover-Kohl has incorporated the highest standards of sus- has seen their share of challenges but at the same time tainability and environmental sensitivity into many of our they also have grown in a way that improved their original plans. Nationally,we also helped lead the LEED ND effort design. in the US and helped co-write requirements and metrics. LEED ND stands for Leadership in Energy&Environmental Design, a green building certification for Neighborhood 2.3.10 EXPERIENCE CONDUCTING PUBLIC CHARRETTES AS Design. Their parking standards often include provisions A COMPONENT OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE ENGAGEMENT. for the use of permeable surfaces such as pervious con- crete and drain pavers for onsite retention and treatment. Dover, Kohl & Partners has a time-tested charrette Flexibility for sustainable stormwater engineering, sug- approach to town planning that emphasizes intense corn- gested hydrological reforms, green infrastructure and munity involvement and compelling visualizations. This where possible, district-wide stormwater approaches can approach applies the method of the National Charrette be included in plans. Institute,which Dover-Kohl helped to establish,and utiliz- es innovations and techniques developed through 25 years of professional practice. The result of our approach is a record for high-quality,constructive public engagement. That said, no two projects have been exactly alike. The y usecree to Dover-Kohl's ability to adjust to a variety of circumstances is found in the firm's ability to listen and remain flexible, and in the involvement of the company's principals on every project.While we learn from each proj- ect,our combined experience on a range of projects across the United States and abroad has left us with the patience, perseverance, and know-how to find a solution and adapt our approach to even the most unique situations. A rule of thumb says that in most American communities today,a handful of citizens(perhaps less than one-tenth of one percent) will always participate in civic affairs. That's especially true for North Miami Beach. They routinely • t � � attend City Council meetings, planning debates, and zon- ing hearings. Their participation is crucial, but these are �� Public Hands-on Design Session the "usual suspects" and you can usually count on their RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.69 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 2.3.12 URBAN DESIGN AND MASTER PLANNING SKILLS, 2.3.14 ABILITY TO WORK COOPERATIVELY AND CON- ALONG WITH THE PROVEN ABILITY TO CREATE A SENSE OF STRUCTIVELY WITH CITY STAFF. COMMUNITY AND PLACE, AS WELL AS EMBRACING THE EXISTING ECLECTIC ELEMENTS THAT HELPS TO DEFINE AN Call any project reference that Dover-Kohl has led,beyond even the ones we have submitted to you,and you will find AREA. that we worked cooperatively and constructively with City Urban Design and Master Planning are one of our team's Staff.Many of Dover-Kohl's staff were once municipal staff strengths. All of our plans are place-specific. If you look and we understand the opportunities but also the chal- at any of our team's plans you will notice that not a single lenges from the City's perspective. Active participation on one is exactly the same. All of our plans are catered to the part of City staff is crucial. This partnership between each place, whether it is the way design is applied, the the Dover-Kohl team and City staff will ensure the timely character of street and public space designs, the specific completion of the project and its ultimate success. urbanism that is being encouraged, or specific architec- Prior to the charrette, Dover-Kohl will ask the City to tural elements. appoint a designated point of contact. This person will The documentation and analysis phase and early public serve as project coordinator with Dover-Kohl throughout participation feedback gives a specific direction to the the project, including during the charrette and in the plan.We do not produce"generic"urbanism but rather a post-charrette phase. Also prior to the beginning of the menu of elements that are endemic to North Miami Beach charrette, the design team will require base information and the region. Important questions about character of from the City, including scaled base maps, aerial photo- the project area include how new development ties into graphs, relevant previous studies, available GIS informa- and relates to the natural context which is so important in tion, and other appropriate documentation. defining North Miami Beach's distinct identity. City staff will be integral in helping to identify key stake- holders and groups, and assist in arranging stakeholder meetings throughout the length of the project. Dover- 2.3.13 SKILL AND EXPERIENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF Kohl will provide the City with up-to-date information LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT IMPLEMENT A and images for use on the website. Promoting and build- COMMUNITY VISION. ing awareness of the planning process (especially the charrette) will be a shared responsibility between Dover- Overtown is one of the oldest neighborhoods in Miami and Kohl and the City,and perhaps one of the most important which is experiencing re-investment and redevelopment components for the success of the public participation today. The area is part of a Community Redevelopment process. Dover-Kohl has many proven strategies for corn- Area(CRA)established to promote overall physical,social, munity engagement,and will assist the City with develop- and economic revitalization of the neighborhood. The ing appropriate mechanisms for getting the word out. 2003 Plan authored by Dover-Kohl sets forth the mecha- nisms to guide growth and redevelopment of the com- munity. The land development regulations in Overtown, Downtown Kendall and South Miami were important steps, bridges to creating the Miami 21 Zoning Code which members of our team contributed to. 2.70 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners w p, w a O T � 7 TAB 2.4 a� , 0- STANDARD FORM 330 & FINANCIAL CAPACITY 2.4 Standard Form 330 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PART I—CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER February 26,2015 RFQ 2015-086-YG B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Hernan Guerrero,Project Manager&Town PLanner 5.NAME OF FIRM The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.666.0446 305.666.0360 hguerrero @doverkohl.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) 0 Z o 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT d U The Image Network Inc, • Project lead consultant a X dlblal 171 Sunset Drive Coral Gables,FL 33143 • Land use planning and urban design • Community engagement Dover,Kohl&Partners • Multimodal transportation planning The Street Plans 221 Aragon Avenue, Suite 204 • Planning and design of facilities for bicycles and b X Collaborative Coral Gables, Florida 33134 pedestrians ®CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE • Tactical Urbanism Planning X ARCADIS,US 8201 Peters Road, Suite 3400 • Water Management Solutions ®CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Plantation, FL 33324 • Sea Level Rise Sabadell Financial Center, d X Goodkin Consulting 1111 Brickell Bay Drive • Economic Analysis Miami, FL 33131 e X 137 Giralda Avenue • Historic Preservation JSK Architecture Group Coral Gables, FL 33134 • Architecture X 500 W Cypress Creek Rd#630 • Landscape Architecture Chen Moore&Associates Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 • Civil Engineering RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.71 Dover,Kohl Sr Partners February 26,2015 E.RESUMES QF;KEY-PERSONNEL'PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT • A. •- (Gorrrplet�one�SecGo n Efor-each Re person.) , 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jason King Principal,Senior Project Director a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 13 years 9 year 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND University of Rhode Island,South Kingston,RI—Master of Community Planning DISCIPLINE) University of Rhode Island,South Kingston,RI—Bachelor of Arts in English 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Certified by American Institute of Certified Planners Certified Charrette Planner,National Charrette Institute Accredited Member,Congress for the New Urbanism 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SEVENS°,THE PROSPERITY PLAN FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA(Florida) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Bnefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X a Seven50 is the plan for the seven counties of Southeast Florida for the next fifty years.The region includes 121 municipalities and over six million people.Plan creation involved over 5,000 people participating in a series of regional summits and local workshops and over one million people via an interactive website with online weekly polls,a scenario modeler,social media,discussion forums,and a regional data warehouse.Jason led a fifteen-firm,multidisciplinary counsultant team as it worked closely with local universities and regional planning councils,the Florida Department of Transportation,and a 200-member public and private partnership.Jason was principal author of the Seven50 Prosperity Report.Seven50 was funded by the US Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities and was featured on National Public Radio and in The New York Times.Role:Leader of multidisciplinary fifteen-firm consultant team (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED EL PASO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN(El Paso,Texas) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X b. Jason headed the Plan El Paso planning initiative which involved multiple charrettes and a multi-disciplinary team which worked with residents,stakeholders,and officials from the City,state and Fort Bliss Army Base,to create the El Paso's overarching policy document.The plan was unanimously approved by the El Paso City Council and was awarded a 2011 National Award for Smart Growth Excellence by the US Environmental Protection Agency.Jason advises plan implementation which involves capital projects,land development policy,TOD development,and the form-based coding of large sections of the City.Role: Project Manager/Town Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED BRADENTON FORM-BASED CODE(Bradenton,Florida) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X C. The form-based code provides a regulatory framework to achieve density,walkability,and transit-readiness in Bradenton's core and central neighborhoods. Sustainability permeates the document,and mandates or provides incentives for eco-friendly building and planning at many different scales,from the corridor and neighborhood to construction details.Jason headed the Transect planning for the SmartCode based-code which received a Driehaus Form-Based Codes Award in 2012.Role:Head of Transect planning (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED HAMMOND COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN(Hammond,Louisiana) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2009 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X d. As Project Director Jason headed the planning team as it worked with residents to identify the principles of quality design and efficiency present in the City's most values places and discuss how those elements could be applied to newly developing areas of the City.Local goals correlated closely with state-wide goals: citizens seek to create enduring places that succeed economically while also contributing to a high quality of life.The plan was adopted by the City in 2011 and implementation is underway.Role:Project Director (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROSPECTS FOR SOUTHEAST LEE COUNTY DR/GR PLAN(Lee County,Florida) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of Applicable) 2008 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X e. As Project Director for the Lee County Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource Initiative.which involved a 150 square mile region of southeast Lee County. Jason led a planning effort that involved detailed ecological mapping,surface and groundwater modeling,traffic impact evaluation,multiple land use studies,a transferable development rights program,form-based coding for new communities and implementing amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations.The Plan received an award from 1,000 Friends of Florida.a Florida APA Project Award(2009),a CNU Charter Award of Excellence (2010),and a Driehaus Form-Based Codes Award(2011). Role:Project Director STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 2.72 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ', • - L E:,RESUMES KEY PERSONNEL�'PROPOSED FOR THUS-CONTRACT (Complete one Section h for each key),ersortt 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Joseph Kohl Principal 29 27 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL— Master of Architecture Virginia Polytechnic Institute,Blacksburg,VA— Bachelor of Architecture 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Treasurer, Form-Based Codes Institute,2004—2012 Member,Technical Review Committee,South Miami-Dade Watershed Plan,2004-2006 Former Board Member,Urban Environment League Charter Member,Congress for the New Urbanism(CNU), 1993—present (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Boundary Street Master Plan and Code—Beaufort,SC 2006 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm a. Principal I Town Planner:The Boundary Street Plan is a comprehensive strategy for growth and redevelopment of the 1.5 mile corridor which seeks to improve the safety and operational efficiency for all modes of travel while creating a more economically productive address."Designing in public,"the team of planners,engineers,architects and economists conducted an open planning process in September 2005 to identify the ideas, needs and concerns of the community. The Boundary Street Master Plan identifies specific sites for infill development as well as overall roadway improvements.The plan is designed to be broken down into small components that can be implemented as the market demands. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Bradenton Form-Based Code—Bradenton,FL 2012 N/A b. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Beef scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge: Joe worked with the City of Bradenton Florida and various stakeholders to change their existing downtown zoning to a new form-based code.The new ordinance included guidance for architectural design and sustainable practices.The project area was 1,830 acres in size. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) The Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Plan—Arlington County,VA 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm c. Principal I Town Planner:The Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Plan will complete the final phase of Arlington County's Columbia Pike Initiative. This plan identifies policies and initiatives that can be put in place to guide future growth and investment in the residential areas of the Columbia Pike corridor according to the community's goals and vision. Implementation tools proposed include a Form-Based Code to guide new development,and a TDR strategy designed to attain historic preservation and affordable housing goals. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Downtown Master Plan—Richmond,VA 2007 N/A d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Principal I Town Planner:The City of Richmond Community Development department selected Dover,Kohl&Partners to undertake the update of the Downtown Plan in 2007.Public input played a key role in the creation of the plan,with over 700 community members participating in a week-long charrette. The Master Plan is both a physical plan to guide appropriate development and a policy document to serve as a blueprint for action. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Plan El Paso—Comprehensive Plan for the City of El Paso,TX 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm e. Principal/Town Planner: Over the course of two years,Dover-Kohl led the process of rewriting El Paso's Comprehensive Plan.The Plan El Paso process was interactive and bilingual, and included charrettes in multiple areas throughout the city. The Dover-Kohl team worked with residents, stakeholders and city officials to create a guide to the City's future growth and enable Transit-oriented Development.During the charrettes,the team was able to talk to over 800 studio visitors,meeting attendees,and hands-on participants. STANDARD FORM 330 PAGE 2 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.73 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 • E.RESUMES.OF KEY-PERSONNEL.PROPO'SEb.FOR THIS CONTRACT • • (Complete one Section E far.each•key"persgn.) . 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Hernan Guerrero Project Manager,Town Planner a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 years 1 year 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND Florida International University,Miami,FL—Master of Architecture DISCIPLINE) Pratt Institute,Brooklyn,NY—MS City&Regional Planning Clark University,Worcester,MA—Bachelor of Arts in Geography 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member,American Planners Association LEED Green Associate,US Green Building Council 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Fort Ord Reuse Authority(Monterey,CA) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2015 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Bnefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X a. In October,Hernan joined the DKP team and began working on the development of Regional Urban Design Guidelines(RUDG)for the forme Fort Ord Army base in Monterey,California In February,2015,the team travelled to the area,the size of San Francisco,to conduct a series of charrettes in multiple municipalities throughout the area,which inform the development of the RUDG that will be completed in April of this year. Role:Town Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami 2100—The Miami River in the Face of Sea Level Rise(Miami,FL) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. The City of Mount Vernon,New York,began a comprehensive plan update in 2008.Hernan was instrumental in managing the multiple facets of the endeavour including the design and adminsitration of the kick-off survey,organizing the different stake-holder and public visioning sessions,as well as coordinating the preparation of transit studies and commercial corridor analysis.Hernan was also instrumental in writing grant proposals and securing financing to advance specific`area action plans'.During this time,Hernan also represented the City of Mount Vernon at New York and New Jersey Metropolitan Transit Council(NYMTC)meetings,as this entity investigated the potential for a regional.Role:Graduate Thesis (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Mount Vernon Comprehensive Plan(Mount Vernon,NY) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm The City of Mount Vernon,New York,began a comprehensive plan update in 2008.Hernan was instrumental in managing the multiple facets of the c' endeavour including the design and adminsitration of the kick-off survey,organizing the different stake-holder and public visioning sessions,as well as coordinating the preparation of transit studies and commercial corridor analysis.Hernan was also instrumental in writing grant proposals and securing financing to advance specific'area action plans'.During this time,Hernan also represented the City of Mount Vernon at New York and New Jersey Metropolitan Transit Council(NYMTC)meetings,as this entity investigated the potential for a regional multi-modal system that would make Mount Vernon a regional logistics centers. Role:Planner II (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Myrtle Avenue Revitalization Project/Bid(Brooklyn,NY) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2008 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Serving as Mainstreet Program Coordinator for HARP and the Myrtle Avenue Business Improvement District.Henan was tasked with managing activites d. aimed at restoring the historic character along 22 blocks of this main thoroughfare through downtown Brooklyn.Initiatives ranged from coordinating the planting of trees with NY City Parks and street resurfacing,to providing assistance to property and business owners with the restoration of historic details.in coordination with the Staqte Historic Preservation Office.such as cornices and lintels,installing open-link gates and standardized signage.In some cases. property owners were provided assistance in developing a potential development analysis of their property.Additionally Hernan coordinated street fairs and markets to attract foot traffic to the avenue and promote the many businesses in the district. Role:Program Coordinator (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED An Affordable Housing Plan for Cypress Hills(Brooklyn,NY) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2007 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. Flernan was selected as a CITI Community Development Grantee in 2004•to document all of the foreclosed and blighted homes in the Cypress Hills neighborhood of Brooklyn.NY for the Cypress Hills Local Development Corporation(LDC).He prepared a pipeline of developable homes and created an affordable housing plan that included recommendations for public-private partnerships and the creation of'green'homes.He was hired as Community Development Project Manager in 2006 to manage the gut rehabilitation of 14 homes,including coordination with the federal(HUD),ctate(DHCR)and city (HPD)to create the agency's first Energy Star rated homes program. Role:Project Manager STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 2.74 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl St Partners F E:RES MES`O '+I EY;PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONtR CT'' (,Complete•one.Sectioirr•E for each key person.*}:', s . 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Hernan Guerrero Project Manager 15 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) University of Virginia,Charlottesville,VA— Master of Urban& Environmental Planning University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL—Bachelor of Architecture 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member,Congress for The New Urbanism (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Boundary Street Master Plan and Code—Beaufort,SC 2006 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm a. Town Planner:The Boundary Street Plan is a comprehensive strategy for growth and redevelopment of the 1.5 mile corridor which seeks to improve the safety and operational efficiency for all modes of travel while creating a more economically productive address."Designing in public," the team of planners,engineers,architects and economists conducted an open planning process in September 2005 to identify the ideas,needs and concerns of the community. The Boundary Street Master Plan identifies specific sites for infill development as well as overall roadway improvements.The plan is designed to be broken down into small components that can be implemented as the market demands. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) The Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Plan—Arlington County,VA 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Director:The Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Plan will complete the final phase of Arlington County's Columbia Pike Initiative. This plan identifies policies and initiatives that can be put in place to guide future growth and investment in the residential areas of the Columbia Pike corridor according to the community's goals and vision. Implementation tools proposed include a Form-Based Code to guide new development,and a TDR strategy designed to attain historic preservation and affordable housing goals. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) A Vision for Michigan Avenue/Grand River Avenue —Lansing Region,Michigan 2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm C. Project Director: Amy served as Project Director in this planning effort, which engaged the Lansing region in defining a unified vision for the Michigan Avenue/Grand Avenue corridor from the State Capitol to Webberville. A series of charrettes provided the opportunity for an in-depth community conversation about the future urban form of the corridor, and produced a consensus-based vision for urban design, land use, transportation,and economic development. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) The Town's Blueprint for Charlotte Amalie—St Thomas,USVI 2011 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Director Amy served as Project Director for The Town's Blueprint,a pilot project to demonstrate and test the application of a Form-Based Code(FBC) in the historic neighborhoods of Charlotte Amalie. The first step to creating the Code was conducting a multi-day public charrette to confirm the community's vision for the future;this vision was then translated into new form-based regulations. The vision and code together,when adopted,can be used to guide future development in Charlotte Amalie. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Fort Monroe Reuse Plan—Hampton,VA 2008 N/A e. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Amy served as Town Planner and later as Project Director for the Reuse Plan for Fort Monroe. Through an interactive charrette process, the community and design team arrived at a series of basic urban design, preservation, and policy principles to guide the reuse of Fort Monroe.The Reuse Plan,adopted in 2008,includes land use concepts and limits,historic preservation analysis, preliminary transportation,civil engineering and environmental studies,and market analysis. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.75 Dover,Kohl(St Partners February 26,2015 • • E::RESUMES OF KEY:PERSONNE :;PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT. • (.Cotnplete one Secboh E•for each key person:) + . • 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Pam Stacy Town Planner a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 years 9 year 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL-Master of Arch.in Suburb and Town Design DISCIPLINE) University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL—Bachelor of Architecture 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Certified Charrette Planner,National Charrette Institute Accredited Member,Congress for the New Urbanism 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SEVEN50,THE PROSPERITY PLAN FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA (Florida) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X a Seven50 is the plan for the seven counties of Southeast Florida for the next fifty years.The region includes 121 municipalities and over six million people.Plan creation involved over 5,000 people participating in a series of regional summits and local workshops and over one million people via an interactive website. Pamela was a primary corridinator for all public events and was the principal editor of the Seven50 Prosperity Report.Seven50 was funded by the US Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities and was featured on National Public Radio and in The New York Times.Role:Town Planner/Event Coordinator/ Final Report Editor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED COCOA BEACH GATEWAYS MASTER PLAN(Cocoa Beach,Florida) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X b. Cocoa Beach has remained relatively untouched for several decades,surviving on outside attractors like the Space Shuttle Program.Now the City wants to be "Open for Business"and attract new growth to its commercial areas to attract more vistors and increase its tax base.Pamela led the effort as Project Director to create the Gateways Master Plan.The resulting vision redefines SR 520 as a primier east-west corridor connecting the Banana River to the Ocean with a multiway boulevard.The plan lays out a path to revise fine tune development regulations allowing redevelopment to occur.Role:Project Director • (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED EL PASO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN(El Paso,Texas) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X c. Pamela assisted in and managed the production of over 250 square acres in El Paso while working on the Comprehensive Plan for the City.Pamela was the primary writer for the Urban Design Element and head editor for the overall document.Connecting El Paso Plan was a first step in the comprehensive planning initiative and was unanimously approved by the El Paso City Council and was awarded a 201 I National Award for Smart Growth Excellence by the US Environmental Protection Agency.The complete comprehensive plan has been submitted to the City for estimated approval by May 2012.Role:Town Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED JAMESTOWN MALL AREA PLAN(St.Louis,Missouri) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X d. Jamestown Mall.located in north St.Louis County is in decline.As project director,Pamela led the team in an effort to find ways to redevelop the mall property in a way that is sustainable and a benefit to the surrounding community.The area plan shows the transformation of the mall parking fields into a diverse walkable, • mixed-use village center.Role:Project Director (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED WEST FAIRVIEW AVENUE(Montgomery,Alabama) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm X e. The plan proposes transforming the avenue,an auto-dependent strip of commercial uses,into a"main street"with pedestrian provisions like sidewalks,street trees,benches,awnings and on-street parking and encouraging a greater variety of street-oriented civic and retail uses.The plan was designed in conformance with the City's existing form-based code overlay for ease of implementation and included a Transect map for the study area.Pam served as project manager for this effort. Role:Project Manager STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 2.76 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ' ' E.-RESUMES'OF KEY PERSONNEL'.PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT . . ' ,(:Complate°one'Section E for each key persan) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT _14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Kenneth Garcia Town Planner 7 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Image Network,Inc.d/b/a Dover,Kohl&Partners— Coral Gables,FL 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Andrews University,Berrien Springs,MI—Master of Architecture Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI— Bachelor of Science in Architecture 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member,Congress for The New Urbanism Certified Charrette Planner, National Charrette Institute (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) A Vision for Michigan Avenue/Grand River Avenue -Lansing Region,Michigan 2014 N/A a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Town Planner:The Capitol Corridor plan extends approximately 19-miles from the capitol building to the town of Webberville.Spanning 10 municipalities,the corridor transverses cities,towns and countryside.The resulting plan outlines a vision to guide future growth,change and preservation in the corridor;it also provides recommendations for municipalities and key stakeholders to carry these ideas to implementation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Water Campus Master Plan-Baton Rouge,LA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) 2014 N/A b. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ►ii Check if project performed with current firm Project Director I Town Planner:Working for the Baton Rouge Area Foundation,Dover-Kohl led the initial design of the 30 acre campus that will be the new home of The Water Institute of the Gulf.The campus is expected to grow into a major center for the science and research of river deltas. The Water Campus'walkable streets,public spaces and urban buildings will be a major step toward fostering a better connection between downtown Baton Rouge,the Mississippi River,and Lansing State University. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Plan El Paso—Comprehensive Plan for the City of El Paso,TX 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm c. Town Planner: Over the course of two years, Dover-Kohl led the process of rewriting El Paso's Comprehensive Plan.The Plan El Paso process was interactive and bilingual, and included charrettes in multiple areas throughout the city. The Dover-Kohl team worked with residents, stakeholders and city officials to create a guide to the City's future growth and enable Transit-oriented Development.During the charrettes,the team was able to talk to over 800 studio visitors,meeting attendees,and hands-on participants. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Montgomery Neighborhood Master Plans-Montgomery,AL 2011 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm d. Town Planner:Following the Downtown Master Plan adopted in 2007,Dover Kohl returned to Montgomery for several neighborhood master plans aimed at the revitalization and redevelopment of underutilized areas of the city.These plans were all created through extensive public participation. West Fairview Avenue focused on the transformation of an aging suburban corridor.The Plan for Oak Park and Centennial Hill looked at revitalization strategies for a historic neighborhood.The Maxwell Boulevard Neighborhood Plan targeted the redevelopment of key sites adjacent to Maxwell Air Force Base and Overlook Park. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Curridabat Master Plan&Form-Based Code-Curridabat,Costa Rica 2011 N/A e. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Town Planner:Dover,Kohl&Partners teamed with lead firm Castillo Arquitectos of Guatamala City,Guatamala,to create a Master Plan for the municipality of Curridabat,on the outskirts of the Costa Rican capital of San Jose,with a focus on walkability and livability. Curridabat will be the first municipality in Costa Rica to officially implement a Form-Based Code.It is the recipient of a 2014 CNU Charter Award for Best City Plan. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.77 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 E.,RESUMES OF'KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR-THIS CONTRACT , . .Is,(Complete one Section E`for each.key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Anthony Tepedino Garcia Project Manager a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 12 years 6 years 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Street Plans Collaborative— Coral Gables,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND NYU,New York,NY—Bachelor of Arts in Architecture and Urban Design DISCIPLINE) University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL—Master of Architecture 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Written work published in:The Daily Business Review,Atlantic Cities,Next American City Magazine,New Urban News,The Real Deal,Mome Streetsblog,the Miami Herald,the El Paso Times,and The Miami New Times,among other publications. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Bike-Walk Miami Beach Bicycle Master Plan—Miami Beach,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Street Plans was hired by the City of Miami Beach to re-imagine its transportation network.Working with Atkins North America,Street Plans launched Bike-Walk Miami Beach,a multi-phase project that envisions a holistic and comprehensive redesign of the Miami Beach street network to re-balance transportation priorities and take into account the concerns of pedestrians,cyclists,tree canopy advocates,and neighborhood associations alike.The project builds on previous mobility,bicycle,pedestrian,and traffic safety studies to inform the best methods for integrating active transportation modes into the network.Role:Project Manager • (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Gables Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan—Coral Gables,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. In 2010 the Coral Gables City Commission took the historic decision to invest$400,000 in the expansion of bicycle facilities around the city.At that time,the city also embarked on an ambitious public works campaign to repave city streets and implement traffic calming projects around the city.Regionally,the city is a linchpin between the City of Miami to the north and east and the rest of the county to the west.As such the primary purpose of this study is to identify the projects that can be implemented with the initial$400,000 investment in the short term,while also identifying bicycle and pedestrian investments that can be made in the years ahead. Role:Project Manager (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Plan El Paso—Comprehensive Plan for the City of El Paso,TX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Street Plans contributed to a multi-phase comprehensive planning effort for the City of El Paso, Texas, as it seeks to update its c. Comprehensive Plan and vision for a variety of multi-modal transportation projects. In collaboration with Dover Kohl and Partners, Street Plans joined the charrette team for the first phase of the three-phase project to help calibrate the SmartCode for select Transit-Oriented Development Areas surrounding the existing and proposed Bus Rapid Transit stations. Street Plans also helped the Charrette team formulate a vision for each TOD site,contributing to infill master plans produced substantially at the first visioning charrette. These plans included implementing a multi-modal vision intended to guide future municipal investment in not just transit,but an increase in bicycle and pedestrian mode share. Role:Project Manager (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Trailnet Design Guide-St.Louis,MO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm d Trailnet,the St.Louis region's leading bicycle and pedestrian advocacy organization,retained Street Plans to develop a regional bicycle and pedestrian design guide entitled Streets for Everyone.The multi-modal guide includes a variety of best practice policy and design responses calibrated to typical urban,suburban,and rural land use/transportation conditions found in the St.Louis region.To best illustrate possible and desired physical transformations,Street Plans developed before and after plans,sections,and photosimulation renderings to communicate desired outcomes.Complimenting the physical design solutions are a variety of infographics,case studies,and best practice descriptions that substantiate a more balanced approach to the region's pressing active transportation challenges.. Role:Project Manager (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 2030 Bicycle Master Plan—Miami,Fl PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. Building from previous advocacy and planning efforts with the City of Miami,Street Plans was hired in 2009 to complete the city's first comprehensive bicycle master plan.With a goal of putting a bikeway within a 1/4 mile of every Miami residents,the ambitious 20-year master plan expands a baseline of 15 disconnected miles of existing bicycle facilities to a network of more than 280 miles.To make This happen,the Plan introduces five new bikeway types,includes a full network of bicycle boulevards.The Plan also recommended 3,000 new parking spaces along with parking type and placement guidance.Structured on the League of American Bicyclists'6 E's,The 2030 Plan also includes extensive education,evaluation,and encouragement program recommendations. Role:Project Manager STANDARD FGRM 330„(1/ 4a PAGE 2 2.78 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl St Partners RESUMrES'OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED'FOR THl;S CONTRACT i.; •.(Complete ohe SectioniEfor each key,person)' 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Mike Lydon Planner a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 9 years 6 years 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Street Plans Collaborative— Coral Gables,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI—Masters in Urban Planning DISCIPLINE) Bates College,Lewiston,ME-Bachelors in American Cultural Studies 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) CNU-A Collaborator on"The Smart Growth Manual" Founding member of the New England Chapter of the Congress for the New Urbanism. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Bike-Walk Miami Beach Bicycle Master Plan—Miami Beach,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Street Plans was hired by the City of Miami Beach to re-imagine its transportation network.Working with Atkins North America,Street Plans launched Bike-Walk Miami Beach,a multi-phase project that envisions a holistic and comprehensive redesign of the Miami Beach street network to re-balance transportation priorities and take into account the concerns of pedestrians,cyclists,tree canopy advocates,and neighborhood associations alike.The project builds on previous mobility,bicycle,pedestrian,and traffic safety studies to inform the best methods for integrating active transportation modes into the network.Role:Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Gables Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan—Coral Gables,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. In 2010 the Coral Gables City Commission took the historic decision to invest$400,000 in the expansion of bicycle facilities around the city.At that time,the city also embarked on an ambitious public works campaign to repave city streets and implement traffic calming projects around the city.Regionally,the city is a linchpin between the City of Miami to the north and east and the rest of the county to the west.As such the primary purpose of this study is to identify the projects that can be implemented with the initial$400,000 investment in the short term,while also identifying bicycle and pedestrian investments that can be made in the years ahead.Role:Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Plan El Paso—Comprehensive Plan for the City of El Paso,TX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Street Plans contributed to a multi-phase comprehensive planning effort for the City of El Paso, Texas, as it seeks to update its c Comprehensive Plan and vision for a variety of multi-modal transportation projects. In collaboration with Dover Kohl and Partners, Street Plans joined the charrette team for the first phase of the three-phase project to help calibrate the SmartCode for select Transit-Oriented Development Areas surrounding the existing and proposed Bus Rapid Transit stations. Street Plans also helped the Charrette team formulate a vision for each TOD site,contributing to infill master plans produced substantially at the first visioning charrette. These plans included implementing a multi-modal vision intended to guide future municipal investment in not just transit,but an increase in bicycle and pedestrian mode share. Role:Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Trailnet Design Guide-St.Louis,MO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Trailnet,the St.Louis region's leading bicycle and pedestrian advocacy organization,retained Street Plans to develop a regional bicycle and d• pedestrian design guide entitled Streets for Everyone.The multi-modal guide includes a variety of best practice policy and design responses calibrated to typical urban,suburban,and rural land use/transportation conditions found in the St.Louis region.To best illustrate possible and desired physical transformations,Street Plans developed before and after plans,sections,and photosimulation renderings to communicate desired outcomes.Complimenting the physical design solutions are a variety of infographics,case studies,and best practice descriptions that substantiate a more balanced approach to the region's pressing active transportation challenges.. Role:Planner (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 2030 Bicycle Master Plan—Miami,Fl PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. Building from previous advocacy and planning efforts with the City of Miami,Street Plans was hired in 2009 to complete the city's first comprehensive bicycle master plan.With a goal of putting a bikeway within a 1/4 mile of every Miami residents,the ambitious 20-year master plan expands a baseline of 15 disconnected miles of existing bicycle facilities to a network of more than 280 miles.To make This happen,the Plan introduces five new bikeway types,includes a full network of bicycle boulevards.The Plan also recommended 3,000 new parking spaces along with parking type and placement guidance.Structured on the League of American Bicyclists'6 Es,The 2030 Plan also includes extensive education,evaluation,and encouragement program recommendations. Role:Planner STANDARD EDRM 3IL1/2oo4a PAGE 2 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.79 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 E;;RESUMES;OF KE,Y PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THE S CONTRACT - - �(Complete one Section E/oreach key person:) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Piet Dircke Water Management a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 30 years 8 years 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) ARCADIS—Highlands Ranch,CO 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND Wageningen University,The Netherlands—MSc,Water Management DISCIPLINE) Wageningen University,The Netherlands—BSc,Tropical Land&Water Mgmt 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Chairman of the Board,Flood Control 2015 Foundation Co-Author of"Building with Nature:in search of resilient storm surge protection strategies"ISSN 0921-030X Co-Author of"Connecting Delta Cities III;Resilient Cities and Climate Adaptation Strategies"ISBN 978-90-72498-00-7 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Adapting Mission Bay to Rising Tides(San Francisco,California) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Advisor on Climate Resiliency strategies in San Francisco for the SF Public Utilities Board and the Port Authority. Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Manhattan Seaport City(New York, New York) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. Feasability Study on a project combining land reclamation&multi-purpose flood protection.Role:Advisor • (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Brooklyn Rotterdam Waterfront Exchange(Brooklyn, New York) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm A US-Dutch public private program on developing community leadership & climate resiliency in Brooklyn South. Combining c. climate adaptation, education, innovation and sustainable urban waterfront development. Leading a team with Rotterdam partners RDM Campus and Rotterdam University,and NY partners Columbia University and Pratt Institute. Role:Team Leader (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Delta Plan 2100(Bangladesh) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2013 d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Preparation of the TOR for the Delta Plan 2100 for Bangladesh. He also accompanied the Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100 delegation, headed by the Minister of Planning, Mr. Khandker,on their visit to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Verizon Flood Protection Program(New York, New York) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. Project to protect Verizon downtown Manhattan office following Hurricane Sandy Role:Advisor and Project Director • STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 2.80 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners • Et RESUMES OF KEY,PERSONNEL PROPOSED',FOR:THIS'CONTRACT' + ' (Complete one:S6ctiorr E•for each key persons j ••' r •• 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jack Winston Real Estate Consultant a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 30 years 15 years 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Goodkin Consulting— Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL—Master of Business Administration DISCIPLINE) University of Miami,Coral Gables,FL—Master of Urban&Regional Planning Pratt Institute, New York,NY- Master of Architecture 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member-AICP,AIA,ULI,APA Builders Association of South Florida—Chairman of the Construction Committee and the Dad County Codes Committee 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED University of Miami—Coral Gables,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. The University of Miami(UM)has formed a separate entity to manage its entire real estate inventory as well as the development of new real estate.The company formed was the Miami Asset Management Company(MAMCO).Goodkin Consulting was selected as the market advisor. Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Nova Southeastern University—Ft.Lauderdale,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2006 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. In February 2005,we began working with Nova Southeastern University(Nova)in preparing a study which would help the client determine the potential for current and future development of its long-range plans for its proposed"University Village." Our study focused on a proposed development of: Retail: 189,200 square feet - Residential:495 units - Office:788,000 square feet - Parking:3,524 cars - Hotel: 300 rooms .Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Royal Palm Village BioTech Research Park—Royal Palm Beach,FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm The stated objective by the Village is a "redevelopment plan envisioned to include academic, research and business c. opportunities." As consultants, our objective is to support that desire with a professional level of research, using proven techniques, historical perspectives, anecdotal experiences, and quantitative methods to establish the level of demand for the above mentioned uses. Our goal and objective is to ensure that the Village has a successful project, and the key to achieving that objective is the reality of the depth of the demand within the market, which we hope to quantify through our research and analysis. Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Homestead AFB ReUse Plan — Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 2001 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm This study was prepared for the Miami-Dade County Commission as a requirement by the Department of Defense before any d. transfer of government property could be finalized.The property in question was 717 acres of the existing 2,937 acres which make up the Air Force Base(1,853 acres would remain for the Air Base's operations.) With this report—in conjunction with the many meetings with the Air Force,the Department of the Interior and the National Park Commission—we acted as the representative of the future owner and estimated the future value of this real estate asset for the County Commission. Role:Advisor (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Port Everglades PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) 1997 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. We were retained by both the Broward County Commission and the Port Everglades Authority to develop a long-range plan for the acquisition of all the adjacent land to the existing port.The plan involved uses,values,and financing options. The plan and concept was approved and the bonding was secured and the lands acquired. Role:Advisor RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PA�'a Dover,Kohl St Partners February 26,2015 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Jorge Kuperman,AIA Architect 31 31 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) J.S.K. International, Inc. DBA JSK Architectural Group-Coral Gables, Florida 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) 1980 Master in Architecture and Urban Design, National State of Florida Registered Architect, Certified NCARB University of Buenos Aires,Argentina State of Florida Certified General Contractor 1972 Construction Head Master, National School of Technical State of Florida Real Estate Salesperson Education, Buenos Aires,Argentina 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Current Board Member of the Historic Preservation Board, City of Miami, Current Member of Steering Committee for Streescape City Coral gables, Past member of the Planning Board,City of Miami Beach, Past President of AIA Miami. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Opa Locka City Hall Rehabilitation/Opa Locka, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. Took the responsibility of acting as the Historic Architect to provide a complete assessment of the existing conditions in order to create a set of recommendations that would take into consideration the applicability of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historical Buildings. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARCHITECT/$1.5M (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Thompson Fish House/Key West, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2013 b.(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Conducted a complete assessment and recommendation using the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings to guide owners in the proper treatment for repairs, missing features, and other frequently encountered problems. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARCHITECT/$250,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Temple House/Miami Beach, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 112 Check if project performed with current firm c. Conduct studies and produce construction documents to turn the building into a multi-use property to hold art exhibits, events for a large number of occupants, conduct seminars and in general a multipurpose property. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ARCHITECT/$450,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED MIA MDAD Cargo Building 716-Miami, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2008 2009 d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm The client, Miami Dade Aviation Department(MDAD),was represented by performing Construction Inspection Services (CIS)for the repairs to MDAD Cargo Building 716. PROJECT ARCHITECT. Construction Cost=$800,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Dade County Public Library-Miami, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2007 2009 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE SI Check if project performed with current firm e. Provided inspections, evaluation of conditions,and recommendations for remedial actions to prevent water intrusion through the windows of the Miami-Dade Cultural Center.Also provided as-built drawings,construction documents of the proposed solution,and construction administration. PROJECT ARCHITECT. Construction Costs=$180,000 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 2.82 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME -13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Ellen J. Uguccioni Historic Preservation Director 30 10 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) J.S.K. International, Inc. DBA JSK Architectural Group-Coral Gables, Florida 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A.Art History, University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO B.A.Art History, University of Hartford- Hartford, CT 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Historic Preservation Officer and Historic Preservation Planner-City of Miami, Cultural Resources Advisor and Director of Historic Preservation Dept. of City of Coral Gables, Sr. Planner, Historic Preservation of City of Delray Beach 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Opa Locka City Hall Rehabilitation/Opa Locka, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm a. Created complete assessment of the existing conditions in order to create a set of recommendations that would take into consideration the applicability of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historical Buildings. DIRECTOR OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION/$1.5M (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Thompson Fish House/Key West, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2013 b.(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE - Q Check if project performed with current firm Conducted a complete assessment and recommendation using the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for • Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings to guide owners in the proper treatment for repairs, missing features, and other frequently encountered problems. DIRECTOR OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION/$250,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Grove Harbour Marina Development/Coconut Grove, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE '4 Check if project performed with current firm c. Presented the designation report to the Historic Preservation Board and how the changes to readapt the project were in compliance with Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Red Fish Grill Matheson Hammock Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2011 d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ig Check if project performed with current firm Upon substantial research and conversations with the Miami-Dade Parks and Recreation Department,the preservation office was able to historically designate Matheson Hammock Park, built as a WPA project in the 1930s. DIRECTOR OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm e. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 • RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.83 Dover,Kohl(St Partners February 26,2015 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Cristobal Betancourt, RLA Landscape Architect a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 20 4 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Chen Moore and Associates Inc,Stuart, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science/Landscape Architecture FL/Registered Landscape Architect 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr. Betancourt is Chen Moore and Associates'Director of Landscape Architecture and Planning. He has experience providing planning and landscape architecture design solutions for public and private sector clients. Mr. Betancourt provides a full range of services starting with due diligence and master planning culminating in detailed site design. He is well versed in the use of low- impact development techniques applied to site planning. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2012 2014 a. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Landscape Architect.Providing surveying,planning,geotechnical investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering and inspection(CEI)services for infrastructure improvements within the public right-of-way(ROW)areas of the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Pointe Phase III/IVN-Right-of-Way Improvement Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2012 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm b. Landscape Architect.Providing surveying,planning,geotechnical investigation,design,permitting,preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering and inspection services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the South Pointe III/IVN neighborhood of Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Sunset Islands I&II PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2011 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm c. Landscape Architect. Planning,design,permitting,bid and award and construction engineering and services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the Sunset Islands I&II neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses 11,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including 10,900 LF of 8-inch water main replacements, stormwater drainage improvements,paving&grading,traffic pavement marking and signing related enhancements and roadway reconstruction. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NW 154 Street Planting Recommendations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Lakes,FL 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm d. Supervisor.CMA is preparing landscape planting recommendations addressing line of sight and FOOT requirements along segments of NW 154th Street(Miami Lakes Drive).Planting recommendations will be in accordance with the Town of Miami Lakes'Beautification Master Plan.CMA is visiting the project site and analyze the condition of existing vegetation and assessing current locations of plantings for line of site issues relative to FOOT Index 546.CMA will also identify suitable planting locations for additional tree canopy implementation. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Martin Cty Parks&Recreation Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Stuart, FL 2015 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Principal.Chen Moore and Associates is the prime consultant for the development of Martin County's Parks and Recreation e. Master Plan.Our firm is providing a complete update of the Comprehensive Master Plan with a focus on examining the positive economic impacts that parks and recreation services bring to their communities.Our scope of work involves providing Facility Inventories and Assessment,Community Needs Assessment,Visioning Workshops,Vision and Implementation Strategies, Draft and Final Master Plans.CMA is using cutting edge Geographic Information Systems(GIS)technology in the form of ESRI Collector Software to completely catalog the Clients€TMs existing Parks and Recreation Assets.CMA is also utilizing MindMixer Software,an on line town hall,for follow up data gathering and public input after in person focus group sessions. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 2.84 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Gregory Mendez,PE Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 0 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) . Chen Moore and Associates,Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Engineering/Architectural Engineering FL/Professional Engineer 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Mendez has more than 15 years of civil engineering experience in site and infrastructural development type projects for public and private facilities. He has extensive utilities design experience and is also very experienced with fast track projects. His experience includes water,drainage and sewer designs,design reviews,managing designs and construction budgets,managing field inspection staff and managing client relations. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3&4 ROW Improvement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2015 2015 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Manager. Chen Moore and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture for the utility infrastructure and roadway reconstruction of two islands(Sunset Islands 3 and 4)off the Miami Beach west coast,along the inter-coastal waterway. The project consists of the replacement of 8"potable water mains,the lining of existing sanitary sewer mains,a completely new storm water drainage system, including discharge pumps and outfalls,the undergrounding of all existing overhead utilities,new service connections to all properties,complete roadway reconstruction and grading with new pavement section and curb,landscaping,signage and striping. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NMB-Highland Drive Traffic Calming PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) N Miami Beach, FL 2014 N/A b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager.CMA is providing traffic calming services for the City of North Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NMB-NE 180th Dr-Roundabout PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) N Miami Beach, FL 2014 N/A c. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager.CMA is providing design services for a roundabout for the City of North Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED East Bird Rd Corridor Sanitary Sewer Improvement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami, FL 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager.Civil engineering services for sewer improvements along the corridor of Bird Road(SW 40th Street)from Red d. Road(SW 57th Avenue)and Ludlam(SW 67th Avenue)within the commercial corridor(Exhibit A)on both sides of the street utilizing low pressure sewer design concepts. The project intends to connect various small commercial sites on both sides of the Bird Road Corridor as well as the shopping center at the NW corner of Red Road and Bird Road and nearby David Fairchild Elementary School. The project includes an initial engineering analysis phase with the preparation of a technical memorandum with options and recommendations for pump strategy,small and large pump station selection,power,maintenance,permitting considerations,etc. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED MDWASD PSIP#0356 Improvement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Opa-Locka, FL 2015 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Manager. Pump Station(PS)0356 is a wet well pump station and is located in a mainly residential area. Chen Moore and Associates is responsible for the design criteria to upgrade Pump Station 0356 to obtain a Miami Dade RER permit to carry out the project.The upgrade consisting of the installation of two(2)new submersible pumps in a new 8-foot inside diameter wet well with a minimum of 1-foot increase in depth will bring PS 0356 into compliance with the peak flow and Consent Decree regulations. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.85 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Patrick Kaimrajh, PE Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 6 3 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Chen Moore and Associates,Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Science/Civil Engineering FL/Professional Engineer Bachelor of Science/Civil Enaineerina 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr. Kaimrajh has six years of experience in civil engineering design,drafting,permitting and construction inspection.His design experience includes paving,drainage and stormwater management.He has prepared engineering drawings,cost evaluations, design reports and various permit applications. In addition,Mr. Kaimrajh has performed construction inspections for drainage installations and assisted in soil sampling activities.He also is skilled in AutoCAD Civil3D,familiar with FDEP Standard Operating Procedures(SOPs)for water sampling,and trained in FEMA Certified Benefit-Cost Analysis(BCA)software. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City Center Right-of-Way and Utility Improvement Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2012 2014 a. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Engineer. Responsible for providing surveying,planning,geotechnical investigation,design, permitting,preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering and inspection(CEI)services for infrastructure improvements within the public right-of-way(ROW)areas of the City Center neighborhood of Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Pointe Phase III/IVN-Right-of-Way Improvement Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach,FL 2012 2012 b. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Engineer. Responsible for providing surveying,planning,geotechnical investigation,design, permitting,preparation of construction documents,bid and award and construction engineering and inspection services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the South Pointe III/IVN neighborhood of Miami Beach. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Sunset Islands I&II PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2011 2013 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm c. Engineer.Chen Moore and Associates is the prime consultant responsible for planning,design, permitting,bid and award and construction engineering and services for infrastructure improvements within the public right of way areas of the Sunset Islands I&II neighborhood of Miami Beach.The project encompasses 11,000 LF of ROW infrastructure improvements including 10,900 LF of 8-inch water main replacements,stormwater drainage improvements,paving&grading,traffic pavement marking and signing related enhancements and roadway reconstruction. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Sunset Islands 3&4 ROW Improvement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2015 2015 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm d Engineer.Chen Moore and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture for the utility infrastructure and roadway reconstruction of two islands(Sunset Islands 3 and 4)off the Miami Beach west coast,along the inter-coastal waterway.The project consists of the replacement of 8"potable water mains,the lining of existing sanitary sewer mains,a completely new storm water drainage system, including discharge pumps and outfalls,the undergrounding of all existing overhead utilities,new service connections to all properties,complete roadway reconstruction and grading with new pavement section and curb,landscaping,signage and striping. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NW 154 Street Planting Recommendations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Lakes,FL 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X]Check if project performed with current firm Engineer.CMA is preparing landscape planting recommendations addressing line of sight and FOOT requirements along e' segments of NW 154th Street(Miami Lakes Drive).Planting recommendations will be in accordance with the Town of Miami Lakes'Beautification Master Plan.CMA is visiting the project site and analyze the condition of existing vegetation and assessing current locations of plantings for line of site issues relative to FOOT Index 546.CMA will also identify suitable planting locations for additional tree canopy implementation. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 2.86 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency or 10 projects.If not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Seven50 Prosperity Plan, Southeast, FL 2012-2014 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Sustainable Communities Initiative, Marcela Camblor-Cutsaimanis 772.708.1108 Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Seven50 ("seven counties, 50 years") is a blueprint for growing a more prosperous and resilient Southeast Florida during the next 50 years and beyond. The plan works to encourge socially inclusive communities, a *.- vibrant and robost economy, and careful stewardship of ► . �' the fragile Southeast Florida ecosystem as it quickly becomes one of the world's most important mega- regions. �- Dover, Kohl& Partners led a multidisciplinary consultant tv- team to create the plan, mapping a strategy for the best 4 possible quality of life for the over six million residents in Monroe, Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. ,G Lucie and Indian River counties. Dover-Kohl worked closely with the South Florida and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councils and led a multi-disciplinary team of consultants that included leading regional and national experts such as Carras Community _, Investment, Cardno-Entrix, Jean Scott, HDR Engineering, MetroQuest, ,• Duany Plater-Zyberk&Company, Criterion Planning, and Roar Media, among others.. ' Seven50 included an extensive public process using both interactive online forums and hands-on live events. Online forums included polling, interactive mapping of civic and cultural assets throughout the region, a Data Warehouse,which is a collection of GIS layers for the region that is viewable without proprietary software, an online scenario modeler, and active Facebook and Twitter conversations. Project events included television and radio appearances, four regional . summits, travelling roadshows in each county, and several planning � directors'forums. Each live event included multiple methods of gathering information from the public including keypad polling, keshot videos, one-word cards translated into word clouds, small table 2 Prise a discussions, one-on-one conversations, and surveys. Overall the process reached over a million different people in a region of six million Contract Amount: $2,038,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Dover,Kohl&Partners Coral Gables,Florida Prime consultant(phase 1 and 2) Partners for Economic Solutions Washington DC Subconsultant(phase 2) RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.87 Dover,Kohl(St Partners February 26,2015 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency.or 10 projects if not specified 2 Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Plan El Paso, El Paso, Texas 2010-2012 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of El Paso Carlos Gallinar 915.541.4662 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) In 2010 the City of El Paso commissioned Dover, Kohl & Partners to create a detailed Comprehensive Plan and regional- scale Future Land Use Map for the city. The Comprehensive Plan is an overarching policy document that directs the City of El Paso in its implementation of consensus-based goals created through an extensive public process. The goals, objectives, and strategies of the plan involve all aspects of City administration and community life: land use, urban design, historic preservation, economic development, housing, transportation, health, sustainability, infrastructure, public facilities and services, international coordination, and Fort Bliss Army Base relations. Dover-Kohl leads a project team that includes Spikowski Planning Associates, Charlier Associates, Hall Planning and Engineering, Sottile and Sottile Architects, Chael, Cooper&Associates, Urban Advisors, Zimmerman/Volk Associates, IPS Group, Mind Mixer Web Solutions, CEA Group, W-ZHA Economics, UrbanAdvantage, Matrix Environmental, and The Street Plans Collaborative. Plan principles included developing multiple centers within the city, protecting the growing metropolis'agricultural and natural landscapes, reclaiming marginal and abandoned areas near the heart of the city as infill opportunities, creating a framework of transportation alternatives, utilizing historic preservation as an economic development tool, creating a range of open spaces throughout the city, and coordinating transportation, recreation, public services, and community institutions to increase the city's tax base hand-in-hand with an increased quality of life of residents. Plan principles form the basis of the multi-element Comprehensive Plan. Dover, Kohl & Partners served as the urban design/charrette facilitation consultant to the National Charrette Institute. Contract Amount: $3,026,100 .. ��e � iii///// / iii /�% �%%�� i �.� i. /�/� % '. of y ,.. .�. t 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Dover, Kohl&Partners Coral Gables,FL Subconsultant to National Charrette Institute 2.88 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl SE Partners F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 'KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency or 10 projects,if not specified 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Cocoa Beach Gateways Master Plan, Cocoa Beach, FL 2010-2011 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Cocoa Beach,FL Zachary Montgomery,Mayor 321.868.3297 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Cocoa Beach is emerging from a period of limited development and ° " growth. The City hired Dover, Kohl & Partners, assisted by Spikowski Planning Associates, EPR, and Community Design t Associates to help reverse this trend and encourage private ._ � -�-t° investment to attract more visitors, businesses, sales, and 1 ultimately, tax revenue. The City's Charter, Comprehensive Plan ;,.4�-, "1 ° and Zoning Code have intermingling development restrictions that i resulted in decades of practically no development. The plan , fi t.., includes suggested revisions of the most stringent regulations, y �� .*i ,� ",-1?.:;%''-,-**0401c ,,,-,permitting new growth. •° -- ry , The Gateways Master Plan is comprised of three distinct study areas, each of which has under-utilized spaces that have the „„=N' potential to become great centers of activity. A five-day design charrette was held in January 2014 which brought together community members, community leaders, elected officials, t` , property owners, and the design team to work together toward a 4_ —‘ common vision for Cocoa Beach. The design team helped to establish local consensus and worked with the community to seems the potential that Cocoa Beach has to offer through hands-on design exercises. Forming a general consensus establishes a base for future public support which is often necessary to erase roadblocks in the regulations and enable the desired types development. The plan was reviewed by Cocoa Beach Commissioners and was unanimously passed in June 2014. Changes to land development regulations and Comprehensive Plan are progress. Contract Amount: $202,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Dover,Kohl&Partners Coral Gables,FL Prime Consultant RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.89 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects.if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PR-OFESSIO NAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Bradenton Form-Based Code, Bradenton, FL 2010-2011 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Bradenton Timothy Polk,Director of Planning 941.932.9400 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) From 2000 to 2009, the City of Bradenton embarked on a series of planning exercises that sought to reverse a long decline of the downtown core and surrounding historic neighborhoods, and to protect local industries such as citrus processing. In 010,the City hired Dover, Kohl&Partners to lead a public process,the goal of which was the creation of a form-based code implementing the community's goals of revitalization, sustainability, and preservation of community character.While he previous Euclidian-based zoning included regulations such as setbacks and buffers that promoted formulaic sprawl •evelopment, the form-based code includes metrics that were derived from the historic,walkable, city fabric in Bradenton. he form-based code unleashes development potential in the city by removing suburban parking ratios, making zero-foot setback developments legal, and eliminating minimum lot-size requirements that kept parcels from being redeveloped. Unlike the previous code,the form-based code includes designs for pedestrian-friendly, multi-modal thoroughfares, rchitectural Standards that promote climate-responsive, authentic buildings, Landscape Standards that encourage habitat reation and local food production, and Sustainability topics such as dark-sky lighting, renewable energy generation, and low-imprint stormwater design.All regulations in the code are tied to the transect-based regulating plan. Karin Murphy Planning&Consulting, Inc. and Hall Planning and Engineering, Inc.collaborated with the creation of the form-based code. During the hands-on design session, Dover Kohl& Partners asked citizens and stakeholders to perform urban design surveys and measure parts of the city that embody the walkable, attractive, and enduring character of Bradenton. Next, Dover Kohl& Partners helped the citizens to use the metrics that they extracted in the first exercise to demonstrate how to repair eroded portions of the city, and propose infill and redevelopment. The drawings and documents that resulted became he basis for the content of the form-based code. This exercise was an innovation to the usual charrette process. Rather han merely visioning, the participants became acquainted with the"DNA"of their city and how to equate good urban"DNA" ith healthy urban fabric. Over the following months, drafts were reviewed by various City Departments, citizens, and stakeholders and the code was refined. Contract Amount: $200,000 r 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Dover,Kohl&Partners Coral Gables,FL Prime Consultant 2.90 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many or as requested by the agency or 10 projects if not specified 5 Complete one Section F for each project} 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) 1 City of Mount Vernon Comprehensive Plan, Mt Vernon, NY 2008-2010 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME C.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Mount Vernon Jaime Martinez,Acting Commissioner Planning 914.699.7230 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) From 2009 to 2010 the City of Mount Vernon carried out a revision to their Comprehensive = Plan that had not been carried out since 1969.A substantial amount of the work was 1 performed by the city's Department of Planning and Community Development(PCD). During that time period, Hernan Guerrero, the project manager for the North Beach Master Plan proposal, was the staff person and main point of contact during the Mount Vernon planning process. As such he coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan Steering committee, created the community survey that was used as a point of departure to solicit public involvement. He Ilk also facilitated the majority of the stakeholder meetings with the local and regional business a , community, local and regional elected officials, local and regional transportation professionals and other involved parties. ;Jr(OF MOUNT V Mr. Guerrero prepared all base maps,wrote grants to fund multiple initiatives related to the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN plan, including a Brownfield Opportunity Area Program gran grant that funded a revitalization study for`Canal Village', the formerly Industrial ALAmoF s (... ection of the City; and a Tri-State Transportation Campaign Grant that helped fund two for the three Transit Oriented Development studies " ~4`� a prepared during this time period. He also closed out the Smart Growth grant from the NY Department of State which funded a Mobility Plan and ' ? Mount Vernon Redevelopment Action Plan. MOUNT �� As a result, the City was able to develop a vision for the comprehensive VERNON 0 "--- plan through a public planning process. The City further synthesized the results of the public meetings and surveys to identify the most widely l Y 'E supported actions that would guide the City in the future. A map was Cf developed to categorize areas of the city by level of planning intensity areas.Areas identified as High Intensity Planning Areas were those areas where the city would seek to go after redevelopment aggressively through - --,=- - , TOD initiatives to stimulate interest from the development community. �� = Low Intensity Planning Areas were those areas where quality of life ' ` k, issues needed to be addressed through streetscape and neighborhood ° - beautification initiatives and Character Preservation Areas were those areas where community stakeholders believed no major planning was ; required and that existing parks and streetscape needed to be rf PELHMI maintained. Mammy lntsnsity Areas -`e-. 'j MANOR Mr. Guerrero's experience in working with the public, consultants and " s,-r"' "'� -`��``— government entities makes him the ideal person to manage this project. I Contract Amount: N/A 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.91 Dover,Kohl(Sr Partners February 26,2015 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Bike-Walk Miami Beach Bicycle Master Plan 2012-Ongoing N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami BeachTransportation Dept Jose Gonzalez,PE 305.673.7000 x6768 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Street Plans was hired by the City of Miami Beach to re-imagine its transportation network.Working with Atkins North America, Street Plans launched Bike-Walk The Handlebar Survey Miami Beach, a multi-phase project that envisions a holistic and comprehensive - Miami Beach - redesign of the Miami Beach street network to re-balance transportation priorities of Iiicycang CO115110111 tai: and take into account the concerns of pedestrians, cyclists,tree canopy advocates, iie nt***Gttgotway hletworok ups and neighborhood associations alike. The project builds on previous mobility, Mien Beath,Fiords bicycle, pedestrian, and traffic safety studies to inform the best methods for .1>«- uI1 integrating active transportation modes into the network. The project started in June 2012 with two kickoff bicycle summits,where community residents were introduced to the planning team, and heard a lecture on the latest best practices in transportation planning from Street Plans. In addition to the Bicycle Summits, Street Plans designed and built a project website that further augmented the public participation process. Following the initial meetings, the project team vet Mans Med around sad,t in ire c rto documented existing conditions, leveraging Street Plans' innovative handlebar dursbnddie survey process, and meeting with community residents. The project website served an important role in the public involvement program for this project. Rather than a static website with basic project information, Street Plans included interactive web-based map applications to get real time data from residents, as well as a full best practice guide to bicycle/pedestrian planning. This "sir interactive website supported in-person public involvement efforts, including numerous community workshops. .. Street Plans is now in the process of developing the final plan for this project.The plan includes a robust existing conditions analysis, and detailed section and plan- view drawings to illustrate project recommendations. The plan makes recommendations for policies and programs, and provides detailed guidance on implementation.A Street Design Guideline insert will support the implementation section of the final plan. Street plans expertise in pedestrian and cycling plan development will be critical to this project as we seek to integrate a mobility strategy appropriate for the master plan area. Contract Amount: N/A 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Street Plans Miami,FL Subcontractor 2.92 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 rY , Dover,Kohl&Partners lc PROJECTS• CC�i% PROPOSED 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUAL'IFICAfTIONSCONTRA.CT KEY NUMBER m 7Prbjects g regue.sted($jtg FA®projects,illGrlrltspeed. . • 7 • ' Complete ! �., 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for San Francisco Bay 2012 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER San Francisco Bay Conservation and Will Travis,Executive Director 415.352.3653 Development Commission 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The shoreline of San Francisco Bay is extremely vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise.Approximately$64 billion in property value on 240 square miles of Bay shoreline is at risk of significant flooding. ARCADIS is assisting Bay area agencies in assessing risks and developing adaptation strategies.We developed a decision support tool for planners and decision makers to develop their own shoreline adaptation strategies.ARCADIS led a team that also included U.S.and Dutch engineers and scientists to investigate sea level rise impacts on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay and develop appropriate strategies for adaptation.This study was the first ever project of an alliance between the Netherlands and California on climate change adaptation. Major components of the study were: Hydrodynamic modeling, using Delft 3D,to assess the impact on wave climate,tidal activity and flow fluxes under different sea level rise scenarios. A comparison of institutional arrangements in the Netherlands and California, including a SWOT-analysis,to determine if government in its current setting is capable of properly addressing and implementing climate change adaptation strategies. The development of a decision support matrix from which a climate change adaptation strategy is derived,based on economic and natural system dynamics.These strategies range from tidal denying,ecology driven,and economy driven,to tidal embracing development,depending on the type of shoreline and future ambitions.The strategies are complemented by a suite of over 50 different adaptation measures. ARCADIS has just begun a follow-up assignment to assess the sea-level-rise vulnerability of Bay Area transportation infrastructure. Therie expertise and leadershiop in the arena of planning adaptation solutions to sea level rise makes them a critical part of our team. Contract Amount: N/A 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Arcadis,US Plantation,FL Subcontractor RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.93 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ' po XM;1142,F,RoJEcTs,MMETI LUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S• 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT . :QUALIFICATIONS PalliGa CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present erg rot j projects E 3 requested by 619 agency a?uI 3•meets.,UJuxiI specifies: 8 eo plete ap Sectron.G M)55d project.j 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) University of Miami Market Advising 2003-2010 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER MAMCO Mike Katz,President (252)232-6028 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The University of Miami (UM) has formed a separate entity to manage its entire real estate inventory as well as the development of new real estate.The company formed was the Miami Asset Management Company(MAMCO). Goodkin Consulting was selected as the market advisor and in that role completed assignments such as: • Market research studies that lead to the proposed development of UM South, an 1,200-unit master planned Traditional Neighborhood Designed (TND)community with a Town Center consisting of 60,000 square feet of retail, 40,000 square feet of office, a public library, a public magnet high school and 400 rental apartments. We worked with the planners in formulating the master plan and continuously consulted with MAMCO on negotiations with perspective developers and joint venture partners. We developed an economic impact study for the University to help value the real estate. • A market study and development proposal for the Smathers Estate, a 35-acre tract that was left to the university. We formulated a unique residential proposal for single-family homes to be sold exclusively to UM faculty and administrators. • We worked with MAMCO's management as consultants for the long-term ground lease for a site (owned by UM) across Red Road just west of the university campus to be developed as market rate rental housing within the City of South Miami. Goodkin Consulting track record in market analysis makes them a valuable part of our team as we seek to ground the ideas that we develop through the charrette process in to what is feasible given current market conditions and future market projections. Contract Amt: N/A 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Goodkin Consulting, Inc Miami,FL Subcontractor 2.94 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners STANDARD SECTION "F" F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Opa Locka City Hall Rehabilitation/Opa Locka, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2013 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Opa Locka Kelvin Baker, City Manager 305-953-2868 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope,size,and cost) Scope of Service:The Opa Locka Old City Hall is a building registered in the National Archive of Historic Places and therefore its conservation or alterations falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service. The scope of work of this project was to produce a complete report for the rehabilitation of the Old City Hall.JSK Architectural Group took the responsibility of acting as the Historic Architect to provide a complete assessment of the existing conditions in order to create a set of recommendations that would take into consideration the applicability of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Rehabilitation of Historical Buildings. The assessment required very detailed on site studies and comparison between original record drawings as created by the design Architect and the building as it stands today. Construction Costs: $1.5M • • ll� _ , v gel . „.. - , 71": - , „ • f. y ice f . H I it af6 1 t� 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE a. JSK Architectural Group Coral Gables, FL Historic Preservation Architect (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE C. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE f. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 3 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.95 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,If not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Euclid Streetscape Improvements(Lincoln Center Building) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if Applicable) Miami Beach, FL 2015 N/A c23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER R&0 Studio LLC Omar Moreno 305.741.4220 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Chen Moore and Associates is providing civil engineering and landscape architecture services for the pedestrianizing of Euclid Avenue between Lincoln Road and Lincoln Lane in the City of Miami Beach.This stretch of road will be incorporated into the historic pedestrian street known as Lincoln Road Mall.The project is funded by the City of Miami Beach through a developer's agreement with Lincoln Center Associates which owns the retail building at the intersection of Euclid Avenue with Lincoln Road.The project requires coordination with various agencies including the City of Miami Beach Planning Department, Public Works,Greenspace management,and Capital Improvements,as well as Miami-Dade County Environmental Protection,Traffic,and Utilities.The scope of work includes providing site design and permitting including layout, hardscape,landscaping, lighting,drainage,and utilities. • vim 11lMrlliialMNNMINmiM 7 "Veil • 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE a. Chen Moore and Associates Miami, FL Subconsultant (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE b. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE C. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE d. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE e. (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE f. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 3 2.96 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ' '` C•KEY PERSONNEL,QAR,Ttc1PQTION4K.EXAM'PLE PROJECTS . 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY 27.ROLE IN THE (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing PERSONNEL CONTRACT table.Place"X"under project key number for (From Section E, (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 8 40 Jason King,AICP,CNU-a Principal&Senior Project Director x x x x Dover,Kohl&Partners Joseph Kohl,CNU-a Principal, x x x Dover,Kohl&Partners Hernan Guerrero,Assoc.AIA, Project Manager,Town Planner, LEED-GA Dover,Kohl&Partners James Dougherty,AICP Principal,VP,Director of Design, x x x x Dover,Kohl&Partners Town Planner, Pamela Stacy,CNU-a Dover,Kohl&Partners x x x Town Planner, Kenneth Garcia Dover,Kohl&Partners x x x Anthony Garcia Principal&Project Manager x x Street Plans Collaborative Mike Lydon Principal&Design Support x x Street Plans Collaborative Piet Dircke Global Leader of Water Management,ARCADIS Jack Winston,AICP,AIA Principal&Analyst Goodkin Consulting Jorge Kuperman,AIA Principal Architect JSK Architecture Group Ellen Uguccionni Dir.Historic Preservation JSK Architecture Group Dir.Planning&Landscape Cristobal Betancourt,RLA Architecture x Chen Moore&Associates George Mendez,PE Senior Project Manager Chen Moore&Associates Patrick Kaimrajh,PE Senior Engineer Chen Moore&Associates 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 Seven 50:Southeast Florida Prosperity Plan 6 Bike-Walk Miami Beach Bicycle Master Plan,Miami Beach 2 Plan El Paso,El Paso,Texas 7 Climate Change Adaption Strategies for San Francisco Bay 3 Cocoa Beach Gateways Master Plan,Cocoa Beach,FL 8 University of Miami,MAMCO 4 Bradenton Form-Based Code,Bradenton,FL 9 Opa Locka City Hall Restoration,Opa Locka,FL 5 City of Mt.Vernon Comprehensive Plan,Mt.Vernon,NY 10 Euclid Streetscape Improvements,Miami Beach,FL RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.97 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTING AUTHORITY.USE THE NEXT PAGE OR ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED Please see preceeding sections of this qualifications package for additional information about the proposed consultant team — including detailed reusmes, company backgrounds and additional project examples. I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE 2/25/2015 —S\A ;I . LC • f ( 33. NAME AND TITLE NJ Jason King, Principal & Senior Project Director 2.98 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(if any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS N/A PART II-GENERAL,QUALIFICATIONS•(if a firm has branch offices.complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER The Image Network, Inc. d/b/a Dover, Kohl & Partners 1987 194954897 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a.TYPE 1571 Sunset Drive Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Coral Gables FL 33143 n/a 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Hernan Guerrero,Project Manager&Town Planner 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.666.0446 hguerrero @doverkohl.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(if any) 8b.YEAR ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER n/a n/a n/a 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS (note:these figures represent firmwide revenue,as we do not track this information far individual offices) a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index b.Discipline b.Experience Number Code (t)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) 47 Urban &Regional Planners 12 n/a Town Planning for new neighborhoods, P05 creating redevelopment and revitalization P06 master plans,and re-writing zoning 6 02 Administrative 1 n/a Z01 ordinances for existing neighborhoods, towns and cities Total 13 n/a 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1.Less than$100,000 6.52 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2.$100,040 to less than 5250,000 7.55 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 0 3.$250,000 to less than 5500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million b.Non.Federal Work 6 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 6 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE r 2/25/2015 a- 2i - tc ( J C.NAME AND TITLE Jason King, Principal & Senior Project Director RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.99 Dover,Kohl dr Partners February 26,2015 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(if any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS N/A PART It—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If e`fnithas brand offrces complete for each'specific branch:office�seeking'Iworn) • 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER The Street Plans Collaborative 2010 011499248 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP a.TYPE 221 Aragon Avenue Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Coral Gables FL 33143 n/a 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Anthony Garcia,President The Street Plans Collaborative 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.978.6426 tony @streetplans.org 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(if any) 8b.YEAR ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER n/a n/a n/a 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS (note:these figures represent firmwide revenue,as we do not track this information for individual offices) a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index b.Discipline b.Experience Number Cade (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) 47 Urban&Regional Planners 3 2 60 Transportation Engineer 1 1 P05 Bike Walk Miami Beach 1 P05 City of Miami Master Plan 1 P05 Plan El Paso 1 P05 Connecting El Paso 1 P05 'Miami Health District Bicycle Pedestrian Analyt 1 P05 'University of Miami Pedestrian Safety Plan 1 P05 FHWA Context-Sensitive Street Design Plan 1 • and Technical Assistance P05 Westminster,CO Bicycle Master Plan 1 P05 City of Miami Bike-Friendly Community Applica 1 P05 Albuquerque,NM Rio Grande Boulevard Corri 1 P05 Connecting El Paso 1 P05 Miami Health District Bicycle Pedestrian Analys 1 Total 4 3 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right 2.$100,000 to less than$250,000 7.$5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 3.$250,000 to less than$500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million. b.Non-Federal Work 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE 2/25/2015 C.NAME AND TITLE Anthony Garcia, President STANDARD FORM 330 PAGE 1 2.100 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS SBE PART II -GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER J.S.K. International, Inc. DBA JSK Architectural Group 1982 625712278 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 137 Giralda Avenue a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Coral Gables Fl 33134 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE NAICS 541310 7.NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office) Jorge S. Kuperman,AIA 6b-TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS (305)448-1986 j.kuperman @jskarchitecturalgroup.co 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index Code b.Discipline b.Experience Number (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code , (see below) 02 Administrative 1 A06 Airports;Terminals&Hangers 2 • 06 Architect 1 C10 Commercial Buildings (Low Rise) 2 08 CADD Technician 1 D07 Dining Hall; Clubs; Restaurant 2 37 Interior Design 1 H08 Historical Preservation 1 48 Project Manager 3 H09 Hospital& Medical Facilities 1 H11 Housing (Residential, Multi-Family 1 105 Interior Design;Space Planning 1 001 Office Buildings; Industrial Parks 2 R06 Rehabilitation-Buildings, Structure 1 Other Employees _ Total 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a. Federal Work a =_° 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million ✓y 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million b.Non-Federal Work ,., 44,,L7,1 =? = 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work .P2$- = > 12:,AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE ; `:f ,, b.DATE February 23, 2015 c.NAME AND TI Jorge S. Kupeiti'4,.P,IA AUTHORIZED FOR LOCALRE.PRr!UCTION . `. -° gF -� -- STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 6 a RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.101 February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 1. SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2015-086-YG PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a. FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER Chen Moore and Associates 1986 859459547 2b. STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 155 South Miami Avenue, Penthouse II-A a.TYPE 2c. CITY 2d. STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Miami FL 33130 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Yes(Broward CDBE, State of FL MBE) Cris Betancourt, RLA., Dir.Of Planning and Landscape Architecture 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Chen Moore and Associates 6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS 786.497.1500 cbetancourt @chenmoore.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Chen and Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1986 859459547 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile b.Experience c.Revenue Code b.Discipline (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code Index Number PO4 Pipelines(Cross-country--Liquid&Gas) 5 12 Civil Engineers 17 5 S13 Stormwater Handling&Facilities 6 08 CADD Technicians 10 3 T02 Testing&Inspection Services 5 15 Construction Inspectors 2' 3 R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings;Structures; 1 16 Construction Managers 2 0 P13 Public Safety Facilities 1 02 Administrative 5 1 T03 Traffic&Transportation Engineering 1 39 Landscape Architect 3 0 UO2 Urban Renewals;Community Development 2 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost Engineering and 2 S11 Sustainable Design 1 Z01 Zoning;Land Use Studies 2 V01 Value Analysis;Life-Cycle Costing 1 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 3 R11 Rivers Canals;Waterways; Flood Control 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies,Assessments 1 103 Industrial Waste Treatment 1 P05 Planning(Community;Regional;Areawide& 2 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 1 C10 Commercial Building;(low rise);Shopping 2 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 4 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking 3 Other Employees 0 0 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment&Disposal 4 Total 39 12 C15 Construction Management 4 Total 39 12 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million b.Non-Federal Work 6 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater c.Total Work 6 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a. SIGNATURE b. DATE February 20, 2015 c. NAME • I TITLE P? M.: P.E., LEED AP, President AUTHOR1Z a !R LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 6 MANDATO' 'd E DATE OF ED.RM-514/2004 2.102 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners 2 . 5 FINANCIAL CAPACITY A Dun & Bradstreet Supplier Qualifications Report (SQR) was sent directly to the Procurement Contact Alex Denis, Director,on February 24,2015 as requested in the RFQ.For reference we have included a copy of the same report herein. Supplier Qualifier Report Copyright 2015 Dun &Bradstreet- Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 100150009 ATTN: DOVER, KOHL& PARTNERS Report Printed: FEB 24 2015 In Date BUSINESS INFORMATION DOVER, KOHL& PARTNERS 1571 Sunset Dr Miami, FL 33143 This is a single location. D-U-N-S® Number: 19-495-4897 Telephone: 305 666-0446 D&B Rating: -- Fax: 305 666-0360 D&B Supplier Risk: 3 Chief executive: VICTOR DOVER, PRESIDENT SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK (SER) RATING FOR THIS FIRM : 3 Year started: 1987 Employs: 11 All amounts are displayed in local currency. Sales: 1,900,000 History: INCOMPLETE D&B PAYDEX® D&B PAYDEX: 73 When weighted by dollar amount, payments to Lsuppliers average 11 days beyond terms. J Based on up to 24 months of trade. • SUMMARY ANALYSIS D&B Rating:-- The blank rating symbol should not be interpreted as indicating that credit should be denied. It simply means that the information available to D&B does not permit us to classify the company within our rating key and that further enquiry should be made before reaching a decision. Some reasons for using a "-" symbol include: deficit net worth, bankruptcy proceedings, insufficient payment information, or incomplete history information. For more information, see the D&B Rating Key. Below is an overview of the company's rating history since 01/01/91: D&B Rating Date Applied -- 07/08/95 ER7 04/26/91 -- 01/01/91 The Summary Analysis section reflects information in D&B's file as of February 23, 2015. RISK SCORE ANALYSIS RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.103 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 SER COMMENTARY: - Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry. - Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported. - Proportion of past due balances to total amount owing. PROBABILITY OF CEASED OPERATIONS/BECOMING INACTIVE SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK RATING: 3 The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S. businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 months. Probability of Supplier Ceased 3.1% (310 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive : Percentage of US business with same SER 12% (1,200 PER 10,000) score : Average Probability of Supplier Ceased 5.60% (560 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive : -Average of Businesses in D&B's Supplier Database CREDIT DELINQUENCY SCORE: 550 DIVERSITY Minority-Owned Business: N/A Historically Underutilized Business: N/A Women-Owned Business: N/A Veteran-Owned Business: N/A Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: N/A Vietnam Veteran Business: N/A Small Disadvantaged Business: N/A Disabled-Owned Business: N/A HUB-Zoned Certified Business: N/A Historical College Classification: N/A SBA 8(a) Certified: N/A Labor surplus area: N/A Small Business: YES (2015) CUSTOMER SERVICE If you have questions about this report, please call our Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 from anywhere within the U.S. If you are outside the U.S. contact your local D&B office. *** Additional Decision Support Available *** Additional D&B products, monitoring services and specialized investigations are available to help you evaluate this company or its industry. Call Dun &Bradstreet's Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 from anywhere within the U.S. or visit our website at www.dnb.com. HISTORY The following information was reported 02/26/2014: Officer(s): JOSEPH KOHL, V PRES KRISTEN THOMAS, MANAGER VICTOR DOVER, PRESIDENT DIRECTOR(S): THE OFFICER(S) Business started 1987 by Victor Dover. Relocated Jul 1992 from 4070 Laguna St. 2.104 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners JOSEPH KOHL. background unavailable. KRISTEN THOMAS. Work history unknown. VICTOR DOVER. Work history unknown. Business address has changed from 5879 Sunset Dr Ste #1, Miami, FL, 33143 to 1571 Sunset Dr, Miami, FL, 33143. OPERATIONS 02/26/2014 Description: Urban design and planning consultants (100%). Terms are cash and net 10-30 days. Sells to developers and government agencies. Territory : Local. Nonseasonal. Employees: 11 which includes officer(s) and 2 part-time. Facilities: Leases 500 sq. ft. on second floor of two story cinder block building. UNSPSC UNSPSC (United Nations Standard Product and Services Code) is a globally accepted commodity (Product and Services) classification system. DOVER, KOHL&PARTNERS offers the following product(s) and service(s): 80100000 Management advisory services NAICS Beginning in 1997, the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) was replaced by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). This six digit code is a major revision that not only provides for newer industries, but also reorganizes the categories on a production/process-oriented basis. This new, uniform, industry-wide classification system has been designed as the index for statistical reporting of all economic activities of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services SIC Based on information in our file, D&B has assigned this company an extended 8-digit SIC. D&B's use of 8-digit SICs enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than if we use the standard 4-digit code. 87420505 Planning consultant D&B PAYDEX The D&B PAYDEX is a unique, dollar weighted indicator of payment performance based on up to 21 payment experiences as reported to D&B by trade references. 3-Month D&B PAYDEX: 70 �D&B PAYDEX: 73 'When weighted by dollar amount, payments to 1When weighted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 15 days beyond terms. j suppliers average 11 days beyond terms. Based on trade collected over last 3 months. Based on up to 24 months of trade. When dollar amounts are not considered,then approximately 76%of the company's payments are i within terms. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.105 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 PAYMENT SUMMARY The Payment Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report. Below is an overview of the company's dollar-weighted payments, segmented by its suppliers' primary industries: ■ Total ,Total Dollar I Largest High' Within t Days Slow i Rcv'd Amts Credit ` Terms <31 31-60 61-90 90> (#) ! (5) ($) (%) j (%) t i I i I Top industries: Public finance 4 j 11,000 5,000 100 j - j - ; - - Short-trm busn credit 3 15,750 15,000 98 1 1 - - I Management services ; 2 750 500 100 - j - - - Books-print/publish 1 5,000 5,000 50 50 } Electric services 1 1,000 i 1,000 + 50 50 - - _ Whol service paper 1 750 750 50 f 50 I Radiotelephone commun 1 750 ` 750 50 I 50 - (I - - Ret stationery 1 500 500 { 50 - { 50 f - - Ret mail-order house 1 500 500 50 50 j - - - Lithographic printing 1 50 50 100 - - ' - - OTHER INDUSTRIES 1 50 i 50 100 - . - ; - ii Other payment categories: Cash experiences 4 1,150 750 Payment record unknown 0 0 0 Unfavorable comments f 0 0 1 0 Placed for collections: With D&B 0 0 Other 0 N/A Total in D&B's file 21 37,250 15,000 The highest Now Owes on file is $2,500 The highest Past Due on file is $50 The aggregate dollar amount of the 21 payment experiences in D&B's file equals 23.5%of this company's average monthly sales. In Dun &Bradstreet's opinion, payment experiences exceeding 10%of a company's average monthly sales can be considered representative of payment performance. PAYMENT DETAILS Detailed payment history Date Reported Paying Record 1High Credit I Now Owes I Past Due Selling Terms j Last Sale (mm/YY) ($) (5) ($) Within i I j (months) I � 1 l -- �_--___ -- - -- -— J 01/15 j Ppt 15000 2,500 0 1 mo I , 2.106 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners I Ppt 500: 0 0 I 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 1,0001 1,000 i 1 mo 1 Ppt-Slow 15 750! 750 j 0 ! 1 mo Ppt-Slow 30 7501 0 0 f ; 2-3 mos 1 Ppt-Slow 30 j 500 0 0 N30 ! 2-3 mos Slow 30-60 5,000 1 0 0 {{! N30 2-3,mos I Slow 30-60 250 I 250 50 I I 1 mo 12/14 I Ppt-Slow 60 5001 500 0 N30 { 1 mo 11/14 f (010) I 250E i I Cash account ! 2-3 mos E e 10/14 I Ppt I 50 I 6-12 mos 09/14 F (012) 50 j Cash account 1 mo 04/14 (Ppt 5,0001 1 mo Ppt ! 2,5001 ( j 1 mo 1 Ppt 2,5001 ; 1 mo Ppt 1,000 P 1 mo ( (017) 1001 i Cash account 1 mo 02/14 i (018) 7501 Cash account j 1 mo 11/13 Ppt 500 I 500 ! 0 y 1 mo 1 Ppt I 250 I 250 0 [ 1 mo 07/13 I Ppt I 50' j ! 1 mo Payments Detail Key: red = 30 or more days beyond terms Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of disputes over merchandise, skipped invoices etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. PAYMENT TRENDS SUPPLIER VERSUS INDUSTRY PAYDEX -> -+ PRIOR 4 QTRS _j CURRENT 12 MONTH TREND a � I I i i ! { r--_I--�ti___ --I,---, --- ( --- --- ! --- � ----r I--I -- 1 2015 j__ -, 2013 -- � 2014; - - I --- MAR JUNI SEPI DEC MAR I APR MAYS JUNE JUL AUGI SEPI OCTI NOV DECI JAN i FEB Supplier 76 77 78 ! 77 j 72 171 , 71 1 72 73 € 74 76 1 76 76 76 174 r 73 PAYDEX ; j 1 { i 1 ! ∎ Industry PAYDEX (Based on 27 establishments in SIC 8742) j 11 j Q U P RT 80 80 � 80 ! 80 80 ! � 80 � ! 80 j ( � 80 MEDIAN 80 80 ! 80 1 80 80 1 80 , ' 1 80 i 80 LO QRTI 72 1 72 ` 73 174 74 , i 74 i X 74 I 74 PAYDEX scores are updated daily and are based on upto 13 months of trade experiences from the Dun&Bradstreet trade file. All amounts displayed within this report are in local currency. FINANCE 02/07/2015 RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 2.107 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 One-year statement comparative: Interim Jun 30 1995 Current Assets 48,943 Current Liabs i 85,536 Current Ratio 0.57 Working Capital (36,593) Other Assets 40,347 Net Worth (96,402) The name and address of this business have been confirmed by D&B using available sources. KEY BUSINESS RATIOS Statement date: JUN 30 1995 Based on this number of establishments: 27 Firm Industry Median Quartile Rank (Supplier) Return of Sales: UN Return of Sales: 4.7 N/A Current Ratio: UN Current Ratio: 2.9 N/A Quick Ratio: UN Quick Ratio: 2.7 N/A Assets/ Sales: UN Assets/ Sales: 29.1 N/A Total Liability/ Net Worth: UN Total Liability/ Net Worth: 47.1 N/A UN = Unavailable D&B has been unable to obtain sufficient financial information from this company to calculate business ratios. Our check of additional outside sources also found no information available on its financial performance. To help you in this instance, ratios for other firms in the same industry are provided below to support your analysis of this business. PUBLIC FILINGS A check of D&B's public records database indicates that no filings were found for DOVER, KOHL&PARTNERS at 1571 Sunset Dr, Miami FL. D&B's extensive database of public record information is updated daily to ensure timely reporting of changes and additions. It includes business-related suits, liens,judgments, bankruptcies, UCC financing statements and business registrations from every state and the District of Columbia, as well as select filing types from Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. D&B collects public records through a combination of court reporters, third parties and direct electronic links with federal and local authorities. Its database of U.S. business-related filings is now the largest of its kind. GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY Activity summary Congressional District: • 24 The details provided in the Government Activity section are as reported to Dun &Bradstreet by the federal government and other sources. Copyright 2015 Dun &Bradstreet- Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 100150009 2.108 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners TAB 3 APPROACH & METHODOLOGY D a� � � 0 0 TAB 3 - APPROACH & METHODOLOGY GENERAL APPROACH 1.Data Collection Dover,Kohl&Partners(DKP)and its team members will collect quantitative data detail- ing local conditions in the form of maps and statistics through available local,state and federal data outlets, as well as quantitative information through surveys that DKP will '- create and administer at public meetings using a keypad polling system and through a virtual town hall online system called MindMixer. 2.Public Input DKP will solicit input from residents, property owners, business operators and other ' stakeholders to be identified in coordination with City staff,at public meetings and dur- ing the charrette process in the form of written surveys,as well as through an electronic keypad polling system designed to survey participants on multiple topics including, Data Collection&Public Input but not limited to land use, quality of life and the overall vision for what the commu- nity should look like in the coming years. Additional input will be obtained using the Mindmixer,online town hall system,which will enable participation in the process from people that are not able to attend the public meetings during the charrette process. 3.Cataloging Historic Elements In determining whether or not buildings are historical records of their time and deserve special considerations in either their rehabilitation or reuse, the time of construction must be established. Following that, a physical inspection must occur to determine whether or not the building has been so altered so as to have made the original building s ,, unrecognizable. 3 Should a building(s)be determined historically/architecturally significant,then an anal- ; ysis of the existing zoning would be effected,to determine whether or not the original = = use of the building is its highest and best use,or whether conversion of the building for 1 • a new use should be investigated. The historic districts within the North Beach Areas have been carefully researched so Cataloging of historical elements that the information about many of the buildings within the boundaries specified in this RFQ may already be available.If not,the consultant would utilize a Florida Master Site File form to document the building, and assess its overall contribution to the whole. The master plan must be discerning in its approach so that it allows new and dynamic construction in areas where there are few historic buildings,and when there is sufficient density in historic fabric,to analyze the needs of the community to consider the adapta- tion of a building to a new use,or to rehabilitate the building as its current use. 4.Environmental,Storm water,sea level rise and flooding c ncerns. Avirt- DKP developed the Seven50 Southeast Florida Prosperity plan which serves as a blue- }� r � print for local communities in the region to address the economic impacts of sea level rise. Team members are also heavily involved in finding solutions to this immense ` '� .a " challenge, through participation in the South Florida Regional Climate Compact, the _ AIA Miami Sea Level Rise Taskforce and other regional initiatives, such as the Dutch Dialogues,which brought experts from New Orleans and Holland who have been im le- . .,,, menting solutions for adaptation to rising sea levels. ► _�° �` Team members from Arcadis, US, including Piet Dircke, recognized internationally as %y' a visionary in water management,will be available to address concerns about sea level `~ rise. Together with City Staff and the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel the team will review recommendations from the Miami Beach Stormwater Management Master Plan and Environmental,storm water,SLR&flooding other sources to determine where the Master plan needs to address specific stormwater and drainage capacity or mitigation for potential risks that could arise from storm surges. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.1 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 , 5.Land Use Considerations DKP staff and team members Goodkin Consulting and Donald Shockey will review previ- ous plans and studies,meet with City Staff and conduct our own field research to catalog existing land uses.Input from local stakeholders will be solicited regarding desired uses in the master plan study area through the charrette process and online town hall tool G Mindmixer.We will synthesize all of the collected information and use quantitative data pertaining to local and regional market trends to make recommendations as to what the E most suitable uses should be in the study area and what the current and future markets • can accommodate. 6.Vision Development 4111.6;!-:'1'7W: DKP will synthesize the information collected through the review of existing reports and plans,meetings with City staff, local stakeholders and through the Charrette process in Land Use,Vision&Aesthetics to illustrative plans and develop a report that will represent the collective Vision for the 2.PUBLIC FRONTAGE master plan area.In coordination with City staff and through measured feedback at criti- cal points throughout the master plan process,DKP will develop a long range that will i�� •� • e_ include recommendations for short,mid and long term actionable items. 7.Aesthetic Standards DKP will use quantitative and qualitative information to identify what the existing - y aesthetic standards are and make recommendations for how these can be altered or �- `-* improved to preserve and elevate the character of the master plan area. The quantitative method will include a visual documentation of existing aesthetic char- acteristics pertaining to the urban and architectural design of the area.If necessary these may be illustrated through drawings of specific details. Public Frontage Type Sidewalk Spatial Width 110 Feet Qualitative input will be solicited from the public and stakeholders by using an image Posted Design Speed None R.D.W.Width 110 Feet survey that features pictures of different places illustrating signage,streetscape design, Moving Lanes 44 14 feet and general aesthetic characteristics.Participants will be asked which images they pre- Parking Lanes 12 Feet(at 45 degrees) Pavement Width 56 Feet fer, which could result in the creation of easily to understand aesthetic standards that Curb Type Raised would be incorporated in to the final Master Plan document.Both methods will be used Curb Radius 20 Feet Median None to develop recommendations about aesthetic standards that will become a part of the Sidewalk 30 Feet final Master Plan document. Planter Type Tree Well Planter Width 12 Feet and Variable 8.Mobility Planting Pattern Regular Tree Type Variable(Live Oak Common) DKP and our sub-consultant Street Plans will review previous studies such as the Miami Bike Way Type None Bike Way Width None Beach Municipal Mobility Plan and work with City staff to identify master plan area spe- Aesthetic Standards can be established, in a cific concerns related to transportation systems with a keen emphasis on pedestrian and simple easy to understand format in order to bicycle mobility. Streetscape features that draw attention to the area as being safe to boost development. walk or bike around will attract a critical mass of people critical to the economic success and vibrancy of the district. PP & 9.9 DKP Approach Methodology Following is a description of the suggested DKP approach and methodology developed over the course of the last twenty-eight (28) years. It illustrates our comprehensive method of developing a master plan and includes many of the topics covered above. This methodology is highly adaptable and will be scaled to suit the needs of the City in coordination with City staff. Mobility 3.2 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners METHODOLOGY The following summarizes the general approach toward town planning that Dover,Kohl - & Partners has developed over the past 25 years.We are aware that each project and plan presents unique opportunities and challenges;customization is the key.Our goal -410 is to provide design consultation,drawings,exhibits,and participation in meetings with .. stakeholders, community groups, and public entities as necessary to develop a vision, master plan,recommendations,and implementation tools to guide future development. CONSENSUS THROUGH PUBLIC 'PARTICIPATION j - We recognize that changes in the built environment are controversial;we've found that A Tested Public Process education and a shared sense of authorship is key to creating consensus. Community involvement is an integral component in all of our projects. The Dover-Kohl team has ti numerous techniques for building consensus and helping communities establish imple .` 4 mentable plans that guide future growth and decision-making.Our Charrettes are inclu- sive P 9 9 9 by nature and designed to build consensus from the outset. ;+t - The Charrette focuses community input over a focused period of time through the ` hands-on effort of people representing the full spectrum of community interests. We begin with visual presentations designed to create a clearer understanding and aware- ness of community issues and show examples of highly livable peer communities that share common characteristics with the local area. Compelling Plans&Visualizations Community members with varied interests then work side by side in groups to formulate ;. plan goals,draw their ideas on maps,and then present their ideas and maps to the other - groups.This workshop setting provides members of the community a special opportu- f nity to share and better understand concerns from other perspectives.This technique r is excellent for confirming,updating,or refining ideas from previous planning efforts. VISIONING St MASTER Nd.ANNING: The Dover-Kohl team will set up a temporary design studio in North Beach immediately tolimeNirlim following the public hands-on design session where the team will continue to refine the community's vision.Throughout the week the community's goals are pursued while Successful Results design options and multiple scenarios are tested against economic and transportation based realities.At the same time,the community is invited into the studio to see the plans as they evolve and offer continual feedback on the work being produced. It has been our experience that through these comprehensive charrettes, participants come to care more about the plan — they see their ideas as they are refined and become part of a more finalized vision. We cannot emphasize enough the educational value of this approach either. Citizens become familiar with the tools of good urban design and gain an appreciation of the importance of long-range thinking. Our goal is to make sure that all groups participate,are heard,and understood. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.3 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 VISUALIZING CHANGE STRATEGY FOR A SUCCESSFUL It is difficult to communicate exactly what change will look like. Change is easier to MASTER PLAN accomplish and more believable(acceptable)when we know what to expect—a picture truly is worth a thousand words! In our Charrette process we create many drawings, 1. Provide for community sketches,renderings,computer simulations,and"before-and-after"sequences that can participation by using a help the community study the options,visualizing change before it occurs. Charrette. AN INTEGRATED PLAN 2. Promote participation by private developers, business owners, and Fully detailed, the Master Plan will describe the future development pattern for the property owners in North Beach District. We will illustrate long-term goals for the community such as addition to the general urban design for buildings, public spaces, streets, and housing options. The Plan will public and interest groups. break into natural phases; a "change-over-time" sequence can depict the near-term and longer-horizon improvements and selected catalyst projects can help build 3. Scrutinize the physical confidence in the plan. environment, the transportation systems, REFORMING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS and the economic potential for new Design does matter; well-executed details are often what make prosperous places commercial, municipal to live and work. There may be a need for fine-tuning regulations or to create urban buildings, and other design guidelines and regulating plans to insure that the physical details of the Plan housing opportunities. are translated into the built reality.Dover,Kohl&Partners has created numerous form- 4. Create and refine the plan based codes and other regulatory overlays to assist in the implementation of plans. on site. Community access The key is to regulate buildings,streets,and public spaces to ensure that new buildings to the work-in-progress respect the desired character through their individual volume,scale,and detailing. helps steer the project and yields better results. 5. Create a plan detailing the community's vision and implementation strategy that works for both the short- and long-term. 6. Encourage the media to publish and promote the ( ,ij t does • effort. I Ut t d vow.vo ' C01111n1111711 t 1' 7. Demonstrate ways to rant to be as it evolves? begin positive change in the short-term and sustain it in the long-term. 8. Reform the master plan and land use regulations to ensure and encourage the desired results. 3.4 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach, Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners SPECIFIC PLAN ,�.e V., y'` ,yt, �4 MONTHS 1 - 2 aR J $; grri'y,''.'1,:' ( e w�- w','.:L:"'"'\''''' "' it.,.0� 4,"" ',''p `2W F C3 3 P t p �''fin ,eft: '� '��pg �� r S X.�n c` ; y? ,`f yak �zyy rrp4 � l'''',;.,::,. ra�r a�XA„�' .'xE '� ' F r r S v i ' E yy.... ".'-. '' <.t '!,,.3 k 'r I,/i 4 A.. 1' '�� ,+, F1. � f:Y; ,..... +��;.t ��i�,s �M.h�. '� �. ! s..o..+. �, Phase I will include the review of all relevant information including previous plans and - , ': �',' �` •,,,,,` ,'s studies and background information on the North Beach District supplied by the City,as ' + ' PHASE I DELIVERABLES ° ,,, °4. ,z *. well, well as the inventory and analysis of urban design, land use building conditions, build- 1. Analysis Maps : ing heights, building locations, density and/or intensity of development,the condition 2. Text& 9 9 P P ra hics for tannin of the built environment,and transportation issues that affect the Master Plan area. It t process advertisements will include meetings with the City staff,the public,stakeholder interviews and on-site 3. Project information for websit: , analysis by Dover-Kohl team members. 4. Project Facebook P • ,5. Site Visit Rep PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE CALL o .µ. ;' ' At the start of the project,a Principal and Project Director from Dover-Kohl will sched- t ° ""a,a,' ' '''' ' ` ule a conference call or meeting with City staff to review base information needs,iden- tify stakeholders,and strategize on the public participation process. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS & STUDIES s The team will become familiar with the details of previous plans,studies,and regulat- ing documents related to the master plan area and surrounding parts of North Beach including background information on the district supplied by the City,and other studies including the Intensity Increase Study,the Coastal Communities Transportation Master 1 - , Plan,the North Beach Town Center,and others.These plans and studies will be assessed to their current applicability to the master plan study area and how they will affect future outcomes in the area. - ' ` DOCUMENTATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER idThe team will survey the study area,coordinate with City staff and the public to identify /1• buildings, stylistic elements and locations symbolic of the study area. This survey will ✓ = ,:- -'„ be included as part of the Site Visit Report and can inform the development of specific 'fir.` '' .,• ' design guidelines or suggestions that can be include in the final Master Plan. ` ANALYSIS MAPS § The team will utilize ArcMap GIS or similar base data mapping service,aerial and ground level photography, land use surveys, and expertise provided by the City to acquire the necessary information to create a series of Analysis Maps for the sector plan study area. t „�` `- Information to be mapped may include existing land uses,open space,zoning,planned y_v,, ,�` * land uses, utility easements, property boundaries, ownership, topography, natural resources,environmental conditions including floodplains,cultural and historic resourc- e : - ' 3 L y w es map, existing vacant or underutilized buildings, building height as well as buildings - � �°4ititt, available for adaptive reuse,and a transportation system map.Maps will be field verified during an initial site visit. -� Utilizing this information Dover-Kohl will produce base maps of the planning area to be . , used throughout the Charrette in Phase II by the design team and members of the public. PUBLIC OUTREACH Dover-Kohl and City staff will strategize on the best mechanisms for outreach to - � i y �� individuals and groups.A strategy for soliciting community input,and establishing on- going public outreach throughout the process will be addressed.Dover-Kohl will assist Compelling and simple to understand maps, in the design of flyers, posters, banners, postcards, mailers, and press releases to be charts and models will be created using distributed to the media, neighborhood associations, business associations, and corn- Geographic Information System (GIS)to help the community visualize geographic data. munity organizations(among others). RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.5 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 Throughout the planning process Dover-Kohl will provide information for the City (.;,,,ran....a of Miami Beach's website and updates can be posted on a project Facebook page to '" "" keep the community informed of public meetings and help them follow the planning __�_«,�,___«_,_---..,_---.::::-_ process. Information to be provided will include project updates, photographs, maps, .,-:_,_. .___._....,.._. «-•--- renderings,images,and other submitted deliverables. - INITIAL SITE VISIT _ ..". Key members of the Dover-Kohl team will conduct a 2 to 3 day site visit in North Beach. The team will work closely with City staff and will conduct initial interviews with key --....-..°---~•�-------i-==- •=-----« stakeholders. Descriptions of tasks that can be completed during the site visit are as Dover-Kohl will continually provide updates follows: on the planning process for the City's website. Project Initiation Meeting The Dover-Kohl team will meet with City staff to refine the goals and objectives -"!"-5,.;.,_7d)_la P_M,°tfr_tit"rt,„,r)k,,,6 ';;;,:;-7:7;n'-- of the planning process. Together we will review the existing characteristics of the Master Plan Area including information compiled to create analysis maps. Key elements and recommendations from existing plans and reports that affect the study area will be discussed as to their relevance with the future potential for the Master Plan Area. From these discussions key issues, opportunities, and ` constraints for the Master Plan Area will be outlined. Initial planning principles := and objectives for the area will be developed.These planning principles will later be explored and tested against the publics'desires during Phase II of the planning Flyers, street banners, emails, and mailings process. should be used to notify the community of the planning process. Stakeholder Meetings& Interviews The team will hold additional meetings during the site visit with key stakeholders a,it` `` t il" including property owners, community groups, and other local stakeholders to : -: discuss their goals and objectives for the Sector Area Plan. ...,,, � - = Area Tour Dover-Kohl will tour and examine the existing urban form and analyze the net- t-_, work of streets, blocks and lots, building types, and building patterns with City I staff. The analysis will include a review of the existing land use, density, trans- portation issues, existing streetscape characteristics, urban design elements,and development issues affecting the study area. The team will assess, measure, and document existing building types,building placement relative to the street,build- The team will analyze the existing conditions ing massing, scale, height, primary facade transparency, density and intensity of of the master plan study area and local prec- land use including vertical and horizontal mixing, sidewalks, plantings, lighting, edents in the City,taking measurements, pic- tures,and notes of distinctive urban features. signage,spacial enclosure,and level of street life activity. Kick-Off Press Conference(Optional) Dover-Kohl will be available to participate in a press conference along with the City to inform the community of the upcoming public planning process. ;:, . ,...,....... ... , , : ,,, ,,,,, ,,, „, „, t. ,,,,,,, a-- -- _ 1 ip: ',- ----1 7$ =;;* During the site visit, Dover, Kohl & Partners will be available to attend press conferences and other media events with City staff and officials. 3.6 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners MONTH 3 PHASE 11 - CREATING THE MASTER PLAN AREA VISION The centerpiece of the Phase II will be the creation of the future vision for the Master PHASE it DELIVERABLES Plan Area in accordance with public input and stakeholder involvement during an intensive, week-long planning Charrette held on-site in North Beach at locations 1. betIied Charrette Schedule to be determined with City Staff. Dover-Kohl will lead a series of public meetings, 2. Base Maps of Sector Plan Area design sessions,stakeholder interviews, and technical meetings to quickly engage the A minimum size Of "" -36" community and form the framework for the Plan, including physical design features, 3. "Food for.Thou liar Presentation s transportation,infrastructure,housing,historic preservation,sustainability and resilient redevelopment goals and objectives along with the community's •values and aspirations 4. f.AltsurV$ys for e►tol,-0r1, ession for sector plan area.The hands-on nature of the Charrette and the opportunity to inter- 5: it•survey":resins f r Hand-oti act with differing perspectives allows issues to be quickly identified and resolved.City Sessibrt staff and officials will be involved throughout the week at various meetings,workshops, 6. DetaIled Draft 911ustrtip 'In '1 and presentations.Updates will be provided to the project website and Facebook page Sector Plan Area periodically throughout the charrette. 7. Visuali Lions/Grange-over4ime w 9 Sequences DESIGN THE CHARRETTE FORMAT 8, T;'a pprtirtion At#alys t Dover-Kohl will work with City staff to structure the format of the charrette to best �Re s; meet the needs of the community. Emphasis will be placed on establishing a commu- 9. 41:4141et utpd teiinforMation for' nit vision for the sector plan area, and creating methods to make that vision a reality. Y P 9 website The charrette will include multiple opportunities for people to offer input, including 1O, acebomk'Pa a Up ates �; small group conversations, exit surveys, keypad polling, one word cards, and one-on- ,i'Werk-111-Proftetr`"?.44eritatibe one conversations.A preliminary format for the charrette follows. (Powerpoint) it survey for 'o 4n Progress CHARRETTE. survey results for Work-in,., On mutually agreeable dates, the entire Dover-Kohl team will be in North Beach to Tress work on-site with the community for a week-long charrette. The following tasks will be 14. eyfted polling,esults• completed during the charrette: 1S.Asstssment Report Kick-off Event Sr Hands-on Design Session On the first official day of the charrette, Dover-Kohl will lead a Community Kick- off Event to mark the official start of the public planning process. The event will � feature a"Food For Thought"presentation to educate the public on best practices 41/4"fit in mixed-use, mixed-income development, livable transportation, traditional y � urban design, sustainability, community character, and adaptation to sea level rise, especially how they apply to peer beach communities with a large tourist . VW. industry. In addition, the inventory and analysis of existing conditions will be y, presented to the public to inform and educate them on the numerous planning challenges that must be dealt with during the planning process. Following the Kick-off Presentation, the meeting will transition to the Hands-on Design Session. Participants will divide into small table groups around the room, I oriented to base maps of the sector plan area,and a set ground rules and goals for y the session will be laid out.Each table will have a facilitator from the Dover-Kohl team or City staff to assist participants in a number of design exercises. During the first part of the table sessions, the community will identify the important % issues associated with the future of the master plan area and discuss them in small ,„ 6 �yy �� groups. Participants will then continue to work together and draw on base maps Residents,stakeholders and planners will work to illustrate how they might like to see the area evolve in the future by describing together in groups,drawing their ideas. the uses,open spaces,building design and type,landscaping,street design,hous- ing options, parking,and services,as well as key transportation concerns. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.7 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 At the end of the workshop,a spokesperson from each table will report the find- =-.; ings and major points to the entire assembly. The goal of the Hands-on Design r Session is to forge a community consensus and develop a short- and long-range` s `' vision for the future of the study area. Vstitijil -%-,a- Keypad polling,exit surveys,and one word cards may be incorporated throughout 7. =,, the event to calculate and present public opinion on selected topics identified R during Phase I. Open Design Studio , Following the Hands-on Design Session, the planning team will set-up an Open Design Studio, preferably in a storefront location in or near the master plan area Charrette participants will present their group for the duration of the Charrette week. The team will work on-site to integrate the ideas at the end of the day. information gathered during the analysis of existing conditions phase and Initial Site Visit with the input gained during the Hands-on Design Session to create an - .. --- F.a-d, "- �. overall vision for the area while continuing to gather community input. =4.. Key stakeholders, City staff and the community will be encouraged to stop in - throughout the week as new issues come to mind and to check on the project's status.The following tasks will be completed in the Open Design Studio: . Technical Meetings While working on-site, the Dover-Kohl team will lead technical meetings with government agencies and local experts to address housing,open space, mobility, historic preservation,sea level rise and other relevant topics. The - j/�, purpose of these meetings is to review the emerging vision and receive / y immediate focused feedback from all stakeholders. Additional meetings During the open design studio,charrette par- ticipants can provide feedback on the work with key stakeholders such as property owners, developers, neighborhood done to date. associations,the Chamber of Commerce,the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel and local merchants may be held to ensure their plan objectives are reflected in e -'a the overall plan. . f ' t == Draft Illustrative Plan c, `, r 'z ad �, t� During the Charrette week, the design team will create an illustrative plan , -' ,,. - ;'„ illustrating urban design characteristics such as massing, density and land ,t' .-'.y ``,, use, transportation options, open space and recreation, and economic ,``"`'__ ', '4' ' development opportunities.Scenarios will likely include varying degrees of ' . `,. •• `I density,intensity,and building variety. - . f`t 4 �: While the master plan is being developed issues concerning the growth of ; ..... ..,.1.14„,-\ < t°; P 9 P 9 9 Yf the district and development will be addressed and solutions studied. The a `''. '. K ' _' assessment of the current built environment begun during Phase 1 will test ? �' :� Ie: existing regulations as they address the interface between different land 11 , i l uses,the surrounding neighborhoods,and current built conditions. ��,x �� `''" : „.: ,'�_it' ; ..... -..R` .. .. . _ t. n :, j . :`, -:'M ' ::1, ` .. :,a 1 ■ 4 iiiii r The draft Illustrative Plan will depict an ideal- ized build-out of the sector plan area. 3.8 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl Sr Partners Visualizations Visualizing change is a key component of Dover-Kohl's planning methodology.Illustrations often communicate ideas bet- ter than words,and are valuable tools to test or confirm plan concepts and gather meaningful input. Illustrations,ground level and aerial perspective drawings,and diagrams that present emerging planning concepts will be created in the Open Design Studio to obtain immediate feedback from City staff and the community. Visualizations will provide"change over time"sequences of infill proposals, redevelopment strategies,and streetscape improvements. The draft Illustrative Plan and Visualizations will be accessible throughout the week to allow casual feedback,and will be presented at the end of the week for more formal community input. Transportation Analysis Our team member Street Plans will examine transportation opportunities throughout the Master Plan Area and how they connect to the surrounding community from the perspective of all modes of travel:walking,biking,transit,and driving.This holistic approach to transportation needs will reveal new methods of recovering lost connections.The transportation analysis will inform improved pedestrian and vehicular connectivity,improved access to open spaces and the beach,and streetscape improvements.Transportation improvement strategies will be integrated with streetscape design, based on the belief that successful streets have a duel role of moving people and providing great addresses.Team members Chen Moore will can assist with transportation or civil engineering specific concerns related to transportation. Work-in-Progress Presentation At the conclusion of the Charrette, the planning team will present the week's work at a "Work-in-Progress" presentation. At this presentation, the team will present ideas generated for the Sector Area Plan including the draft Illustrative Plan and Visualizations of the area's hypothetical build-out. A summary of transportation, revitalization and housing strategies will be presented,highlighting the opportunities for quality development. A question and answer session will follow the presentation. During the Work-in-Progress presentation, keypad polling will be utilized in order to generate real-time survey results and opinion polls from members of the audience. We can track response information and view results during the presentation. Keypad polling can help us understand if the plan is on the right-track. el „40 Au, ii ice The Work-in-Progress Presentation wraps up the design workshop and prepares the community for the next steps. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.9 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 *,";1''�4 :�° ' .�'...,•y v-"r^4 a.7., 1"4 ,.. k u C7 ra4: 4k �� 1;`.v ..„,''''.,:.,,'''474,';:. � x^w '�tom, „„k'v% � ��r !„T t r,,,� §�.,, :3.: +, :'ia.,�?. �i� ta .. <s;5{�'7,.. `�.45, � .= a+fiC � :r Cb:'� ".t.> 'Y;,± mot. e8.,:a$d^v, �T r• h 3. . r .. ¢ . ,`.+#�. „1„ COMBATING SEA LEVEL RISE , . a aA . 1 0 1 'ad g t w ^ p re.,-„I r.,.„,,,,..,,,74. 1„,,,, ... �� - y, `'`' Miami Beach, like Southeast Florida's other- -4 fi , t - u ,A barrier islands and waterfront areas,is suscep- - WILL RISE HIGHER " a' � tible to the effects of climate change. Miami ,i Beach is a tremendously high value area that —j�� j is critical to the region's identity and should � -�� mot,,, iii / T � / eb = therefore receive high priority for infrastruc- /i elcle»ez n,ehm,ash /_ - ture adjustments to increase resilience to f# 2 FLOODPLAINS ARE.AREAS THAT _:.* tadi"krtd;F {tftaiota§al' '` sea level rise and storm surges.Through the ROOD WHEN THE WATER LEVEL a0ale€+1- `OSO d`2060.> : } REACHES FLOOD STAGE 'd^ T "4W1'44': F Seven50 project our team worked on solu- :a a' tions to the climate change dillemma and 3 ° used Miami Beach as model in climate resil- ,' iency planning.This thinking would be part of a � /i/ice W y / jai j / the North Miami Beach Plan. i /� MANGROVC RESTORATION. . 1 . 76 STORM SURGE RISES AS THE I BASE WATER �: Our first line of defense can sometimes be a �- .r. } natural one.As native Florida species, man- .. g :. groves have immense potential in minimiz- i/% % ing the effects of storm surge. Mangroves se*—Ir a—y�ii � //jam///// "i �� '' / ' typically have roots that extend deep into the � �° �� '��%'��/��/�� .`w soil, preventing erosion.Mangroves typically .',` flourish in brackish to saline water, allowing r I the trees to fill a biological niche as well as mt >,ro> ,,..„,w,,,,f,,,,,,-7,1-x '» F'A'x,$,4't.a-A it,,,,,,,,,••? ,',;,,,�. '.,, r :,,,„,, er,,,,,Y,.-r `k.„, - • f „, f',-' providing a habitat to ocean life. Existing 30 . o .- y 0 _, p mangroves should be conserved,and restora- �j g #7.— :I, A 9-24 INCHES ` , tion of coastal wetlands should be prioritized. 24 _ 4 . 18 '�,y"Annual Sea ievet et Kea West = �� t\�I S I N G THE E AND -I Projected Sea Level Rise Range&asaden WALT Uafdalit - Historic Key West Sea Level Rise Rate tor Cmprisen wild stronger, higher and safer.FEMA flood 12 2030 %/ : egulations mandate the elevation of new 5-7lNGtfES . / "''"F *"``tructures in flood prone areas. New flood 6 2010 y N� P SEA LEVEL=0 � N/ '`° ones will be created as the water rises. ----- / "' S wve lMfi.E Su lnel fl •q.cnon lat 9E F arida.. ' o " " '-'...'"h-*.'"–P , levating roads above the floodplain will help ,', ; them stay passable in times of high water ,, 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2009 r`: ^� events. Raising the land and surrounding 1 "- from the ocean roads should be part of the scope of work of '.': CI 1 — tA I A r a 9 every new project in Southeast Florida. - y pis movin Y P UPWARD,UNDERGROUND, W BRIDGE REINFORCEMENT W z REGARDLESS OF ' whether there r A L a Bridge failure can prove to have devastating 1 .. i effects, isolating communities and making `, 116‘11‘ a WATER TABLE movement nearly impossible.Bridges may be ,-��/� � �/ �% %� % ��/ particularly susceptible to storm surge and /; ',-'c-,=, ,,-- , -,, �N Wi1TEFi ��/�/ � erosion from repeated exposure. The Master F -�� Plan must work to secure state and federal - funding for North Miami Beach's bridges. ,,,,,,,,,'4,4:-.,4-0,-_.:- .1-. . -.... :'-'-',.=',4!...°I`*47, , ',. ,..„ , lilE 7 V'.i N f ^"xa b 4+iesv .:`axA1.�k «`F „' i t ,t v+� 3.10 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners L q. -. ,«o- ..,.. .Jy. r r"r .. ., .1;:'.c., M.x..: A�?,.:.k.. ,. ;.... . ,z r w:.z:', w.:.,,K.g„ ",i..';�"�, ,a.,C a �,. • ,r`A... .. ,�C�. .t,..,r,t, 1 .',.:xtyy r�i`.. ...,� �, as ,>. y�,", .5',,...? Roc; pC b,... "p.. ,.r. 'S 3',f S'?" x @".� 4 ,,, W�.;:; b�.. ,. \... ."G `M k .. .. r..y ..e'k< fi..V. .y,, d, sW p .:fin` ,.. v:, �:t - k•'+':.+ •ttr 1. e <+,w ..`.... �, .,.v.."F�t 'M. +....,�.-.. ,d.:,v� .n r,t,.., :r ,wA ,,, ,Y::.: U ,.fix .a-:::..:.. rxx,„r r ,� - r d t w., "":a'r 41 t ar ,..... ,;.. b ” r ;.;, .T' 'dx a .r' ra). :Ff": ,�.. ....NM. �.k. .:,< cy�,..,. ,...F. ^da�r,. �'.;. a-$:"r*L ,:. { ;.. ..? y:. :i ; :,.. "3�. ` , T ."'f Y:� r....,:. o. 1 ..: .r v ,o ��. «�, .�. ,., .,,x.!..a.. v,.. n fi '!?x,Y`.ere;'4, +..:<x�.a�:. 4�d '.�.,.h .�y :�4s,-h�da.,ra'�, >~� F..S.,x,,:.�`a a,a��># dw� M"�,._�a,..wau�e;tir�a>..a+��a�,.,ak"' �._.a�a��a.��,..�m.,,.w �n�,a,. '�a,�, .. � � :e� ..,rea �w ..i' x. /^�j� FLOOD INSU:7,,,,,C,,,,,E.,4(SE.,,,...., HURRICANES 1 a L V V � Yw sr�t5 ¢i zr j � ,, Jrap rya:1k xs �„ " y INSURANCE - :, Miami Beach leaders have sought advice OD from representatives from the Netherlands �j where much of the population already lives below sea level. Our team proposes to con- . NATURAL HAZARD tiue that dialagoue with Arcadis engineer Piet h..z _ DISASTERS Dircke whose work has appeared in the New ��i /ice/�� a 1" ' �/�� /�/�j � � York Times and the National Geographic. �// e u c re sa er Th D t h a kept a and dry by tow - °� y/ ing natural sand dunes, 2,100 miles of dams, ` - = = � dikes and locks and a vast pump system. w y = m i x / /i /i/ iii i ver T. /y =0, ��= What lessons can we learn from the global - /ii // /yi �v/// / /% -Q a £ w /,,,,,,,.,_� � do;,��, = G discussion �� - ,,,,, :72 each year w until a4 a the above base eievation... - .�. FULL-RISK RATE }7UMPS the_� from flood damage.., neej tem7,�„ Miami Beach has accomplished a remark- the the flood insurance premium able upgrade to its pumping systems.Water 4/Ir 47r I° sk rate control structures in Southeast Florida have At t historically relied on gravity systems to move rsk rate %/ y %jiej excess stormwater toward the Atlantic and mss y/j //��i �% � the Eve des.These mi rgla systems are beco ng less effective as the sea level rises in low-lying "'` areas and will need to be retrofitted with pumps to help move the water from areas inundated with storm water to water stor- HURRIAI ES , �, age areas and natural bodies of water that r r ' /�� ;,,, can manage t he excess water.Pump stations, a l ,:.::.;A, = % '” 4 rather than a ravi 5 based s stems can be a� ,, � � /, 9 tY Y ii:;...L `t ; .. j/� mss/ /� � �o/„,,,._,,,,,,,,,_.:: ::,,,,,,7,,, used to remove sea water. `i ""+ ,..-' ✓ y ce . -%: � � ATER CONTROL STRUCTURES 6 ' y� � �/ -:�In the City of Miami Beach storm water flows al all the recorded hurricanes // �/ . to hit the us since 1851 made �/ to catch basins through large pipes into out- „, „��,; LANDF �- falls along the Biscayne Bay. When the sea �3�,�ga3, j� level rises water flows more slow) or even �x N2 C�tegw='1 �� %% Y ”' ” '" �� flows rom the water bodies to the streets. R fl �� Currently Miami Beach is subject to tidal - / �� flooding when water levels rise.Miami Beach � --60---41.3", -v / 'e � � is using backflow preventers to take back its 1:2 ::: 640.010-is k . /�i/�//�i/// j// / �/ � ��ii�y��/ is streets from the rise of water..4 W �/ D C T10 U A , ow , !�'/�� ee , � An effective communication strategy is need- I P S o ed to highlight the risks related to climate WIn iftioat-akk-W* //�; �� ' change and the value of adapting policies`� and practices to achieve resilience through- �e a f<out the region. Outreach to the community 7 ''' '''''''...., ,, ,,.,r,..„:. ,,,.,.,,t,..44,,ig, is already underway. The plan must contiue that cony cation RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.11 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015 L. f MONTHS 4 — 9 d ; �+A s m. 1 t t"S�,,ggy l7,,r',, t cb ,! y,*, "� '� v F y b� .f') f x _ ,-,-',.,4,.,',,,,P;° t ,. « p a." ,N},„4 ,wk p .. ' �, '1/4,:,,,A*, �Y:d' Y .CC# 4 $. Sh=,x r� ,',o ti The draft illustrative plan,visualizations,and transportation concepts begun during the � „ i#. u. r, i' t ''` Charrette will be refined to best illustrate the community's short-and long-term goals for '• �•• f t ' '. the Master Plan Area. Graphics and text will be used to demonstrate the common vision ,tP"' �j i ' �°Y i and show what is possible by describing the mix of uses,building types,transitions to the it" ,, ' ° x , surrounding neighborhoods,and street details. 0:: - fined Visualizatio. 'ect upda , ' REFINE ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN VISUALIZATIONS „ r The illustrative plan will be refined based on feedback received from City staff, elected „a1, �'b ,',' officials and the public following the Work-in-Progress presentation.The illustrative plan ':, ''o Page updates"'� ' will illustrate both short- and long-term development prospects and will designate :Y r'•Posed Comprehensive Plan r.` 9- P P p 9 �� , .'endments =;' development intensity and the appropriate mix of uses. ,�, �� o :;, ',,Master Plan Report including The team will also refine the numerous visualizations,based on input received after the , ' ommendations "- Work-in-Progress presentation and in the following weeks. Renderings of key design ';',...,",'-,,./,',„i;,,,,, �'sentation of Report .,%' concepts will demonstrate the possibilities for future development as well as suggested rl "' e o t t. .• ° recommendations for height,scale and cope of building construction that will be pro- , k� .t posed in new regulations. 'a N RECOMMENDATIONS (Sc IMPLEMENTATION Based on the preferred vision for the community, recommendations and imple- mentation steps to make the community's vision a reality will be drafted. These may , include suggested revisions to land development regulations, comprehensive plan , '" amendments, and/or the creation of an overlay district for the master plan area. r Implementation strategies will include steps to implementing the vision within the 5 ,-,. .. : ' year terms that the City has been using to gauge development time-lines.Short-term . ..- - steps that the City can immediately begin will be highlighted to give the community ' l , 1, confidence that their vision will come to fruition. W «',. *""" "'"'` '" r-�" The Plan Report will present the complete findings of the planning process. -. , _. , ' , .-- -..- \ f' *' w.,#„' hill ' ,, ' ,, \ i N ,...y.0„,:,.„ _a_ ..„......ti,, , _ . _ 1 1, 4 1 ‘ , 1 . . ifii,,,„. 4, 1 ,•,, ....., ,.. _., , ,.i,g, a : ' j.A 1 4 ---. IV 4t. - , 1 - ,'...—(':;t41' ';*,.,,,_14 rtl ,. , ,: ,;_il ,,,,, ,$,--'1 1.,.."--- , , t ,y 4 tItL , '.., ' Alt • A.' .. 1 $3' f SPA. Y qr— 'iv ', ' : , r 4 -'"`rte ....�� Visualizations help depict ideas drawn in Illustrative Plan. 3.12 North Beach District-City of Miami Beach,Florida February 26,2015 Dover,Kohl&Partners ■ s . VISION PLAN REPORT Dover-Kohl will create a concise plan document that incorporates and refines portions of the inventory and assessment reports and describes the details of the preferred "' community vision for the Master Plan area Clear planning principles developed by the community throughout the charrette, will guide the Master Plan. Recommendations The charrette is w ere most o Ft and Implementation Steps will also be detailed within this document. The Vision P/an focus and expense of the Dover-Kohl Report including Recommendations will be completed within an agreeable time-frame planning process occurs. But this to be determined with City Staff. allows the majority of Dover-Kohl & Partners' work to be created in PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS OF THE PLAN St RECOMMENDATIONS front of the public's eye giving them, A Principal and Project Director from Dover-Kohl and key members of the Dover- and the City, full access to the work Kohl team will be on-site in North Beach to present the Vision Plan Report and in progress, vision ,.I.n and Recommendations to the public. This presentation could be a special meeting or at an recommendations official public hearing for the commission and/or City Council. The team members will be available to answer questions and explain the details of the plan, overlay district, Also, by working on site, the majority plan amendments and other recommendations. of reimbursable expenses are spent in the North Beach community on A Principal and Project Director from Dover-Kohl and key members of the Dover-Kohl facilities and food during the site visit, ` team be available to the City for additional City Council or other public meetings for the charrette,and public presentations approval of the Master Plan,proposed overlay,and master plan amendments. RFQ 2015-086-YG Master Planner of the North Beach District 3.13 Dover,Kohl&Partners February 26,2015