Loading...
Agreement with Corradino Group d01 f°C11 2 ° (3 v AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE CORRADINO GROUP FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE: TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 AND 2015-29068 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 29 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 34 ATTACHMENT C 35 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE CORRADINO GROUP FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 15 day of December, 2015, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and THE CORRADINO GROUP, a Kentucky corporation having its principal office at 4055 NW 97 Avenue, Suite 200, Doral, FL 33178 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015 and July 8, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015-29041 and 2015-29068, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with THE CORRADINO GROUP and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, 4 which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or 5 excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change 6 Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five 7 (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. 8 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval a roval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager(Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project(as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. 10 extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant p 9 , Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by 11 the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the 12 Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans 13 and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and 14 insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the 15 sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any 17 resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work 18 involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for 20 Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and P P accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: THE CORRADINO GROUP 4055 NW 97 Avenue, Suite 200 Doral, FL. 33178 Attn:Joseph M. Corradino, AICP Tel: (305) 594-0735 Fax: (786) 331-9097 Email:jmcorradino @corradino.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of 26 Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 27 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is'further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEA /y/' B CITY CLERK ,. Atte =S,• � ~• r.INO�G SOUP:•Obi Signature/Secretary flat cifresident Ait-c✓APPROVED A Pik/∎. ""� ..#e)�. ._� �� WO / r Print Name FORM &LANGUA'� ��r\ 26 �`a e &FOR EXECUTION 1% $(3%...sLes..c.: 28 City Attorney me Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE CORRADINO GROUP CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: THE CORRADINO GROUP 4055 NW 97 Avenue Suite 200 Doral, FL. 33178 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Engineer(Coastal or Project Principal $172.50 Other) $116.15 Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/ GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 ` $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/ GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector(CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or Construction) $ 94'88 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT: • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal 32 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29068 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., - ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., URS CORPORATION, E-SCIENCES, INC., CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC., THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC., BRINDLEY PIETERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND BCC ENGINEERING, FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; and WHEREAS, this resolution only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., third highest ranked, Zyscovich, Inc., fourth highest ranked; The Corradino Group, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1- Environmental Engineering was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; URS Corporation, second highest ranked; E-Sciences, Inc., third highest ranked, CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; GFA International, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., are tied as the sixth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., eighth highest ranked, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 2 - Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture was as follows: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., top ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 4 - Structural Engineering was as follows: Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., top ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., second highest ranked; Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., third highest ranked; Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., fifth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., sixth highest ranked, and HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the seventh highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code, which states that in the award of contracts the following, shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract; and WHEREAS, after careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, for the discipline of Structural Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7 day of Ju 2015. ATTEST: / R.fael . Granado Cit ?'. 1 B, h'N; ilip Fvin:.%►'aye, i `S. �.+..� , 4•Zr r J " .!r •. %. T:WGENDA120151July1PR000RE y 014'•.-YG-r•- = sibnal Ar.oitectural and Engineering Services-Reso(Plan,Urban Design,Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).do INCORP ORATED= A;,,�h� ,„` . APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE- . &FOR EXECUTION;(_.ao„to City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Via Resolution 2015-29041 passed and adopted June 10, 2015, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the disciplines of Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines: Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. After reviewing the submission, the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received and the City Code, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 5 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account • Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: D i•artment Director Assistant City Manager City c er Al EC DM ' MT JL T:IAGEN' 100151July1PROCUREMENT12014- 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Sum - (Plan, Urban Design, Env Eng, t Design,Structural Eng).docx MIAMIBEACH A GENDA AGEDA ITEM C 7Z DATE 7-g-IS- MIAMI B City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, .miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSIOI/MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of he City Comm sion FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager �° DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. • Commission Memorandum Accepting the'Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach For Group 1 — Planning and Urban Design Architecture, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services (PLANNING&URBAN LOW DESIGN) Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE,. Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 95 1 93 1 3 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 82 2 88 2 87 3 7 2 BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 79 5 78 3 88 2 10 3 ZYSCOVICH,INC. 80 4 78 3 85 4 11 4 THE CORRADINO GROUP,INC. 82 2 75 5 81 5 12 5 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 4 For Group 1 — Environmental Engineering, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below_. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (ENVIRONMENTAL Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE . ENGINEERING).. Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking • TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 99 2 94 1 4 1 URS CORPORATION 93 2 100 1 88 4 7 2 E-SCIENCES,INC. 89 4 80 4 89 2 10 3 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 92 3 88 3 87 5 = 11 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 5 79 6 89 2 . 13 5 GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 6 80 4 76 8 18 6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 82 6 79 6 83 6 18 6 ■ I CUMMINS CEDERBERG, I INC. 61 8 57 _ 8 80 7 23 8 For Group 2 — Interior Design and Space Planning, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the rank ing of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (INTERIOR DESIGN& Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE_ SPACE PLANNING) Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 92 1 92 1 88 1 3 1 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS,INC. 78 2 73 2 70 2 6 2 I Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 5 For Group 4—Structural Engineering, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering LOW Services Oniel Jose A. Sabrina AGGREGATE, (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 94 1 94 4 6 1 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 100 1 91 3 96 2 6 1 THORNTON TOMASETTI,INC. 97 3 90 4 97 1 8 3 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 95 4 92 2 93 5 11 4 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 90 5 89 5 95 3 13 5 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 70 6 86 6 77 7 19 6 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 60 7 80 7 78 6 20 7 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5)firms be awarded in each category. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code which states that in the award of contracts the following shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. After careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 6 In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. JLM/MT DM/ EC/AD/YG T:W GENDA120151July 1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Plan.Urban Design, Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).docx RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF - - SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender& Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg & Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /0 day of 7ffl2O1 s. ATTEST: ; Al co « A/1/. Rafael E. ranado, City I�.:•�`�������°"`1tiap.,,"Philip Le# ! ?r ^� '� '; T:WGENDA120151June1PR000R.'ENT12014 ,0,-,,V"•4t fes§ions 4 hit- ■{.,:1 and Engineering Services-Reso.docx 5 :INCORP ORATED: coo ' Nom.-- H 2E APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. a Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount - Account Funds: I The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. ()BPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: Department Director Assi: - it Manager City M. ager ; AD 1(;Y, ECX DM MT JLM L4I' T:\AGEND 015\June\PROCUREMENT\2014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa • x • MIAMIBEACH 143 AGENDA I- >Nq C 7 DATE MIAMI BI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members o he City Co / ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Barmello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA (Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar&Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the "Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE " G n •:. "Architectural arc& '" E[1gmaerig Service LQW_ ^ ,AND 1PE ' Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE ECTURE)., -;_ Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS. P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 4 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 :::,< 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 c., 7 3 CRAVEN,THOMPSON& , ,I` ASSOCIATES.INC. 1 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 4 , MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES.INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 70 6 69 4 70 6 Y 16 6 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE ..Profossk4i4 Irc YEottireEan ; .f; Lain/ t„ Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE r ,77, -..t.7, _,,,,. Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking `, TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE& INTERIOR DESIGN.INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 �-ic: 8 1 GLAVOVIC STUDIO,INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES, ' INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 ' 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS,INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 17 7 WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE `'i ARCHITECTS,P.A. 87 4 78 9 75 10 ,`:;.,_ 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS,INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 ==� 34 11 CPH,INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 ';z, 35 - 12 M I` HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 57 12 70 12 55 14 '.r 38 13 LIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 _ 70 12 , 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE t,, RFQ:#, G1 3 G , -,,.,�►rc i1tecturatand :.' )LOw fi, 4.6in"eerJtg Ser,1cesr`'. Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE ¢,,, (TOWN PLANNING) ` Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank ZYSCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 'k; 3 1 i THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 2 76 2 83 2 6 _ 2 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE o E��pt,: ooivii ;; LOW i,. - mo Deborah Rogelio Valeria I ? AGGREGATE ATE y,r_s;< , E� "c, „= Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking �:.. , TOTALS Rank R.J.HEISENBOTTLE 1 it ,;, ARCHITECTS,P.A. 100 1 99 1 I 90 1 �, 3 1 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN S, ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 90 1 ''.„ 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 98 2 91 3 75 4 ;'::' 9 3 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS,P.A. 83 4 84 _ 4 80 3 . , 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING RFQ 2Ot YG Profess [ .iV.Archtteciura 1 a-si4ii gtneerf n `4r $erylce$ e . LOW•CIV(L Servo ERtMG Brian Jose R. Pedro AGGREGATE . ; �„ ., „,,; Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking TOTALS Rank WADE TRIM,INC. 95 2 97 1 81 8 1 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, : INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 10 90 6 96 1 I 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, INC. 96 1 95 3 62 24 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 , BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 I 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY,INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 j:'`' ! 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND .>' I ASSOCIATES,INC. 94 3 87 11 70 18 ,is 32 9 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 13 86 12 74 11 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 .E 1 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, s INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 nl. 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 -,' .. 39 15 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 66 21 ,. 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING,INC. 68 25 77 19 60 26 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 26 73 23 61 25 74 26 LAND SURVEYING ';RFQ#2614--346-YG` r,. -Professionall Arctiiplacturar;i44,= 'a LOW y? Brian Jose A. Pedro - AGGREGATE ,, r ,s, {t7 Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking OTAL$ Rank SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 96 1 80 2 G, 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND ' MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 ;° 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 , 4 84 6 69 5 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 ,, 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING.INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& 3-0 INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES, INC. _ 77 8 75 9 60 9 € 26 9 I 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 For Group 4, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING Y"`=.'a ;.REt #2Q1434G-YEa`e r`ProfessionalArchdecturat and Eng eerfng Services LOW 3 (AAECHANtCAL,ELECTRt Oniel Jose A. Sabrina ,�� AGGREGATE pf tpVlBli•IG ,:;' Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 7 ! 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD ,Consulting Engineers 73 3 87 _ 2 85 3 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the.City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:IAGENDA120151June 1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the - Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and --Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:WGENDA120151June1PR000REMENT 12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION 3 -!5 City Attorney Date 155 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 156 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 M1AMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received - Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office `til then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 &6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question #71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 /2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications" In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 I Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro.... fre ' if jorr, ,,,44.4 A PAI's' Denis rocurement Director 1 II ii MIAMI. BEACH t ! City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibecchfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the."RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical",. under Group B — Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement" from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION. The following clause has been added to Appendix D —Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans • & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM. PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that.Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. { 1 Q2: Section C1. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete NE teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term, we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the. prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially P Y because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together (one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning.. Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for. GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The. City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future.. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting, we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. Al 1: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, • denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted.". As indicated above., Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section Cl. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 • Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014.-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. • Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise: • A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot:do all.these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 —Approach.and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the. RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted" Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A& B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any g p 9 category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites..These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13. of RFQ. 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. 025: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm.to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the • current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as "verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 — Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 i1 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for D un & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) ; } directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2nd underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1' underlined area? Or are you . ? requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 1.2 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name., agency contact, contact telephone &.email, and year(s) and term of • engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects. performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm". The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the 'Architect and Engineer'in each firm /team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 10 in this Addendum. 7 i Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? • A39: Yes. Q40: If the. City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime. proposer will be responsible to hire the app licable or required uired sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select A%E Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full NE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or "Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400 — Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5. relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include: those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and. engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients.. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, Cl Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 I. Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a — it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staffs diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question #24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to "term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the.term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 1.2, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The "user name" is the same as the "email address": yusbelgonzalez(�miamibeachfl.gov • Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical sery ices, our firm provides vides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under. geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC.. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS. KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS& ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC.. I LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO &ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN.INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC` I MILIAN SWAIN &ASSOCIATES BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. = BORRELLI &PARTNERS, INC.. I RED.DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES,:INC.. BRUCE HOWARD &ASSOCIATES I ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP, INC. CALVIN, GIORDANO &ASSOCIATES I SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC j SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC I SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN &ASSOC INC • CES CONSULTANTS, INC. SHULMAN &ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA, INC. I WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC.. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason, we are requesting a time extension for the.Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section, F, when showing project examples, we must list the. Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q64: In regard to RFQ 201.4-346-YG Professional Architectural & Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 1.2 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum.of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for. Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 19 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, # 2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format- TAB 2 - Experience & • Qualifications, we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 — should we include Part I - Sections, A-C; and sections F - Example Projects; G - Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II —General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections D-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, # 2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under "specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design / Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A — Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled "Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 1 � Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A & B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for. each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category (minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A. & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix `C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. I Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez©miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos. &i n 'lex Denis Procurement Director 14 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 1. , 2014 15 MIAMEBEACH CITY OF MIMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- DAB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelg.onzalez .miamibeachtLczov ert. 6?30 'RAUL S. MAS"t'RA?A 2.o55 -k- BANE€0,11 5la-0-130 TrAqsjr‘ra?ct@ vo55Ro4\c cow) 1NNOO LAZIQ ? -v.4 E I , NG • -236-4 3/Z5e-r - cav� rri� rin Cam "TEVElb.) NINSET7 2Q1-#444Ea0 "Wei 11.0 VAILMV1124 31,5 B603702. P.00 MO 6i)lveeP&ISeffiteitonliiti. tem 1 Cut C CUI1 1; 0\vc 0,01 f {,1;m\emb fp x13 1C Lo 274.-6 e�v t 0-4R e\t-es( ' s - - c.. .Coo G P 36s. Ce 3°,s- G 13 - o MA0c7Tom.C. 11.F.4tU'FL•Gds+ vi ,44R7-1/ 2- f ( I A? 8'eAdr air n ,I;tc`• FS9 6' G-77 7( �dD- 77s f , .e4 to Z4 rdearazo2iz behar. caw] D/44 V t1 r i*c44-1 .N1 . ir 3 b r 6 4.-AILG , o 3-C1-* 2-M9 3 Sb r zst. cyLpiCLIP c? .'� T2,t �.rte�foi Eck. W • c MAMIBEACH CITY OF "III ; 'II BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME i�1'1� PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PR E-MAIL ADDRESS P -Ped-,-27 ,±Ci g C. efrb r. Jrvo- o@ifkov,--e_ocA „,(41tr9 2 ME,L.)S P f,;` `t FP--- ivvEy&-,... .` covi c._1,4 -SS )oS" -72"522;2- Lt.1.1 S LA__11r .1) 31)61 510 i0\i‘V\ -b b .41 Gam. /0114 A,/WZ. � � Z75 Li`Si c, /ewe: /X—ce 6-orSoA RAI -36' 5r/-7 561 s9! auc, . MAMIBEACH CI'11 OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECLkLIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FArX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CRIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbeltzonzalez cLmiamibeachfl.cTov ext. 6230 .J,u c"z" •Lu C5-4 /,� 05)44/-s4-51 (6ps)44/-sc94 J gel/ar c5-4Sr©vf.c -, eS 7362 (3as-)--Q- (4oe) cZa25 550° jczS,o4.jDkL,:,L.cotiea4re__fec_ti("cr.,o.frt --Ty ,Li _IA - 3 - a te ' . t , 1116N MAX'S N uC, 4 /R A 305- 401 - liEgNIAKI lot'ilkme .@ (n4..,fire •sort! 32_Cot koit:VN)) (�1 p IAj ry5 to �3 ?o Cu 6,,0‘.f% Keco 0 "Nt". 0-AL - CI-% . Cecc\ o- U A\cZCs- Ai\ I.kc 3C`,�-" " 6l L( - VtLeta c-C,p\MGc , awn •-3 3 23 7 l ;i ,171i(6 q ,c474,4i S° `1 -1.7V M CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY-NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL.ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalez( miamibeachfl.zov ext. 6230 n r i 3-/-i a hex. Ong.; r i t)c acs- C-- � �v a3 s Zvi-� l m a r i 40 e b cG 0,GO01 (7 4 f I ' u(12/Q iie<lqn - f/i) R4cec/ 1.1 '116 (3-6 C)Irf tiki, t i 'ooh rCi ;A. v A\611" °'4)“1-Itg 1;°9 \11 °A 0 e • WA" i ecatkr .52,\5-km5 Tema-60/1a\ 3a5. tel&qe 4e ✓ ems:eom r ect t. °°` F _ ‘223 _ ■ZL.LX tiu C--+fLS ei 11/4- 3os•Z'i q. $ i31 y- sq i2-v"L4 0.0 v4 tic 1 rcANi4- /Lb'let et 4 4-G ire. 4-4-4e44 C �Ls 3 / � `,11 06 -���- t' A-Pt-1 '42-0 Mr Art/B Gt-£FL o A IvUAMIBEACH CITY OF BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE.PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS --rya S As per rS 50s -�- s r �.Svyr kirs. y) (41 -)S,S(*; • 1 py r.,r ` ✓':�"�'S(, �f �� ':.r^.�Iv.»I��l✓'��"'{� �f`-,`�f i'��i:_�,,,,�, ��� '��i a �'//� � � f �f J� � I � 6-) MIAMIBEACH ;, :1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 'I PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PREVT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 Vusbelaonzalez emiamibeachfl.uov ext. 6230 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305) 441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305) 670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Reisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305) 446-7799 Ileana Gonzalez Robayna&Associates (305) 823-9316 Natalie Lockwood, Andrews &Newman (305) 444-6454 Tom Decker Woliberg Alvarez &Partners 305) 666-5474 Victor Herrera NVo (954) 495-21 12 I Douglass Man CB&I 5.61.361.3148 4* MIAMIBEACH BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL. MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME CO PANY NAME ' PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) • E-MAIL ADDRESS Mamie Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Leggy (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates • (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305) 477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-DIAZ & VILLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozyman Haks Engineers,Architects and Land (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting (305) 265-5400 Shawn i Stanley Consultants 786.762.4115 Mark URS Corporation (305) 262-7466 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 13, 2014 1F -°� M[AMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October. 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NANTE COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelg.onzalez�c.miamibeachfl.g.ov ext. 6230 G If5 e (!C:� ) =49 -A-30.- T- INJZA �V�,:be'r�--5/4L E'V�ijtjt e-1:1.�t7 Lc r.4 E t 7�f..G c• E.7: 305.249-S4 1 f ( ✓\5 c A V M77- P,v6, i reP /A/ (.0 . 3 Z Y 7 ( 7 O?v th L/1, 4'&'4 kS (?)5) ErnEs6 ei) . &-7-53- 9/1 r((c3s) CiI 1 S;._r_ �`'t 4:,"i =t:'`�c) 1--v p(riJD0-264 v 11- 5e. "t!o mg: §F26' g .omtz, D-cJc^rl c1f @, $aC6 kf 69- GO I\ 3o5 L5-24co of cam - u cce e 40..(vk •c ari �. - V\a a = ' t ,6 7-1 r a u -`- -- C4. MIAM1BEACH CITY OF ML MI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRILNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement_- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzaleza miamibeachfl.aov ext. 6230 C-M4 — �/ 246,414..=z< 3° 71- /)i c flows/ o_, - C rO �G Cep . 3�s- Q ono vl C(Cervtq wt t Q vtst t C� [ . Ti V —1°7 ane-SS - rt i2 0� 30 5 - �1 73e r nyudez- v4ivie.ss.,. At? vde z 6,1*-ek.,9-cowi \Carta C -E I t \M alp vi e - y t/ tacit 41 •1 iv "1 o t Q r-'4* I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH • PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-Ili SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENG[NEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelUonzalez a,miamibeachfl. ov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Irmovtec 352-459-1974 lance(-Onnovtec.com James Kahn Keith.and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn(rksfla.com. Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Tom Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkski@wadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 3:05-567-1888 Ext. 4034 Jennv.alonso cctvlin.com Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing 561-494-7006 slbolinger f,terracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 William.craven aipuretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 j priem 1eassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters &Associates 407-830-8700 jkemptc bpa-engineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates(c gniail.corn 1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRIVT) PHONE# FAX E-MAIL ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzun @ccphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin LIVS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin@livs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothi.e Franko OCI Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello A'amil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305) 461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 MIAMI BEAC H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 12, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.,, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Becch, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective • proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.,, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. • Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that ha ve elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. cere, a- e n s °rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Pape 1 of 1 M E City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 7, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicpurchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION # 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION # 2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study A 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal__, / Since elgj,` 'r Procurement Director REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIO\ S ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMI BEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov 1\A Af `! BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG 2 1�f11 s5'k��\�l i ���,�� :A.1 '{ 1' B SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicourchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term, with two (2) one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design/Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 NA,I A t '\I E The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19, 2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado anmiamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 2014-346-SR 4 I AAI `/\A BEACH 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence." The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 I A i iJ i :f�`'\`': BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011-3747, a five (5) point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFQ 2014-346-SR 6 AAt,; ,.,/`I BEACH � fi twenty(120) calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18. TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 ,A IA '\. BEACH services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then RFQ 2014-346-SR 8 iv!I AAA BEACH B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATIONIWITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2014-34 6-SR 9 !MIAMI BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2014-346-SR 10 AM{ BEArt-i SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall . submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. j rTAB:'ts '; Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects, provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED, ULI,AICP, APA. RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 IV\!/''iV\iBEACH d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. TAB 2 ,: Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone&email, and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supolieroortal.dnb.com/webaoo/wcs/stores/serviet/Supplier°ortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2014-346-SR 12 ,MI.AAA' BEACH. TAB 3. Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2014-346-SR 13 .\ i AM l BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2 (Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions; or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s) (using the same criteria). Step T Qualitative Cntena � �� `Y��t ' Maximum Points ,` Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvanta•ed Business Enter rise DBE firms. f• TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP't POINTS` 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2 Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three 3)years.See Section 4 below. T.OTALAVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS. _. �a.3 10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 ,: . . RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 - Low Aggregate Score 3 7 . 8 Final Ranking* I , 2 . 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A MIAMI Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 yusbelaonzalez a( miamibeachfl.aov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: r ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. - ' - . •- .-• - - - -• '': _ •- --- - - • • - - -• - - - •• ' _•_ -•■ - P. .. •e. RFQ 2014-346-YG Annendix A — Pane 2 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health • Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. PPn 7n1/1_QAA_Yr A n_ _ _ 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. brn ni /1-2nA-vc ,• ,. r: DISCLOSURE AND.DISCLAIMER SECTION ,4 7'l, . • . The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 5 PROPOSER.CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Resuirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of , 20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B , " No o Bid " RFQ N 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note. It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid? The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid," may result in not being notified ..of future solicitations by the City. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) ..T:-n.:r.eSV.•.Jl- <.-._..I_.. -.i.J•':.l.ar r,i_•G- =!..7 -ar:c ,.-ii.. :...4.)rrJ.t�a._a .f !:M^. .. . ... P - ♦ r._ : .K h�.k... I._. .-_ _C_ -.<. a We do do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: J ._. n-1:.......rY�.4'...Il r..l...Y;rl -s .. ..'lti+.:'-.' .., -. -.. .'Jt..t..-: s.n.:2'l..ey'.I.P..i..ret-:...n l(:'-,l+.-a-�: ' a i[' ._' .a _ '):•4" • .'3-r4_:r.{:.I. Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 Rpn �n 1 d Safi-Y( ooen ix - aae APPENDIX C iNit\ IANI\ 1 BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A— Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes; Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering (Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems; TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages; Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks • Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets; Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display, Theater, etc.) • Lighting (Exterior, Streets, Memorials, Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional, Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities(Parks, Marinas, etc.) • Rehabilitation (Buildings, Structures, Facilities, etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures ,'x&.-'!3i1T-. .±e.Tiv Z•_..z ticlt"'`Yf . `i....n '. 4:,A. '.':YA 23'-.:.•_ ry , ..In_.":'.'.'.:i,__. w,.-'_ ..•: RFO 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping, GIS, and other services: o High Definition Services(HDS) o Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) o Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) o Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) o Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) and Underground Utility Services o These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design),, As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling &Facilities • Testing & Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply, Treatment and Distribution • Zoning; Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status (particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. ,,.;_Y RFQ 201 4-34 Y s �..: E_.. ..�_ __• ._. , � G Appendix ppend C 6 ix APPENDIX D M I AM I EAC H Special Conditions RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201e346-vG Aooendix C 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. P 9n1 A_RAA_Y(, Appendix D — Page 1 APPENDIX E \ 1 A f\\ A 1 D \C Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 I - . x INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V" as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E — Page 1 APPENDIX F I i\ r-I v / 1 v A c D Sample Contract RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND )00000000000 000000000000( XXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 9 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXXXXXXXXX XX, a Florida XXX)O(X)O(XXX having its principal office at X)O<XXXXXX)OCXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)( (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX)UUUUU XXXXXXXX" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXX • XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B — Consultant Compensation. Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D — Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E — Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G — Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work: Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule "D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XXX)OC)CXX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of $150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. I 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XJCXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the • Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be redicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral p p Yp p 9 or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMS\A&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name I SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Historic Preservation Board / Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET r SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. • A 'F. • ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 - I SUBMITTED TO M I AM I B E AC I-1 RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" December 2, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: . = CORRADINO GROUP GROUP A - Planning and Urban Design Jr Engineers•Planners.Program Managers.Environmental Scientists THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC. 0 ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • PROGRAM MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTALSCIENTiSTS Z 0 December 2nd, 2014 0 U Mr. Alex Denis Procurement Director City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ#2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" GROUP A—Planning and Urban Design Dear Mr. Denis and Selection Committee Members: Running a municipality in this era is a complex assignment; doing so while exceeding community expectations can be aided by a close partnership with trusted consultants. In today's world it is a necessity to have a consultant team which has the flexibility to supply professionals of the highest caliber to work in seamless coordination with the City. These consultants must understand how municipalities work in general, but also have specific and detailed knowledge and understand the unique characteristics of each City. Additionally, • consultants must be available on call to provide services. The Corradino Group, Inc. (Corradino) proudly submits this proposal to assist the City of Miami Beach with its Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering Services. Corradino has specifically tailored its municipal services department for these types of contracts. Corradino has been a leader in producing high quality studies, analyses and presentations to elected bodies since 1971, but over a decade ago, the firm re-structured its business plan to provide local municipalities with the same quality of service that the private sector or large state and federal agencies receive. Corradino focuses on public sector clients, to assure there are never conflicts of interest by having worked for or desiring to work for an applicant to the process. You can be assured that Corradino is your advocate. Because of this we feel we are best qualified to assist the City on this contract. Corradino understands that the City is searching for qualified consultants in numerous fields to deal with architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as needed- basis". The firm is applying for the area of Planning and Urban Design. This may include the technical tasks of urban design, comprehensive planning, corridor plans, special studies, data collection and potentially development review. Corradino has held a similar contract with the City for the past several years and has a detailed understanding of the work to be done. 4055 NW 91111 AVENUE SUITE 200 MIAMI, 33178 1 I::L:800.887 55 1 305.504.0735 FAX X 305.594.0755 CFO-WW.CC)RRAII)INO.CC):M Additionally, the Corradino staff has served as department directors, staff, consultants and elected officials for more than 30 cities across the region. The firm, and the individuals assigned to this project, has won multiple awards for their work on similar general services contracts, including cities such as Miami Beach, Miami Gardens, Hialeah, Sarasota, Clearwater, and Palmetto Bay. Corradino understands local governments. The Corradino core philosophy is to produce its work on-time and within budget at the highest quality. The firm understands the demands of today's municipal environments. Our approach has been to make sure to understand what our clients want to accomplish, and then provide them options on how to achieve their goals efficiently and effectively. I, Joseph M. Corradino, AICP, President of The Corradino Group, Inc. will be the Principal-In- Charge, and person authorized to represent the firm. Mr. Alex A. David, AICP will act as Senior Project Manager. He may be contacted at(786) 514-0121. SincereiX, The Cor'rdi o Group, Irk. Jose 1V.Corradino, AICP President etiMIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE &REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT 1 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 8 TAB 2 Experience& Qualifications 14 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM 14 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM(ARCHITECTS &ENGINEERS) 14 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 47 TAB 3 Approach and Methodology 48 APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 usbelgonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: The Corradino Group, Inc. No of Years in Business: No of Years in But�ss Locally: No of Employees 41 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 4055 NW 97th Avenue, Suite 200 CITY: Doral STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33178 TELEPHONE NO.: 305-594-0735 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAx NO.: 305-594-0755 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 4055 NW 97th Avenue. Suite 200 CITY: Doral STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Joseph M. Corradino, AICP, President ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-594-0735 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: jmcorradinoC corradino.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 61-0713040 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 2 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. - ..• . _ . _ - • _ -- --. . . • • . - .• - - e.. •'•- - •• --- " ••• • I • I - • • • . • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 2 3 ii W r P li , . . • • . . . eee - •-• 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave x x Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposerr cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 3 4 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the.Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Ii''1` Addendum 1 1!"; Addendum 6 Addendum 11 ,,'A Addendum 2 �_M Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 ; ' Addendum 8 Addendum 13 I? a`t Addendum 4 I Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Oa Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional-confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. I RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 4 5 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 5 6 • ,. PROPOSER CER�1FICA,TI_ON I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Joseph M. Corra'"lino, •ICP President Signature of Proposers A ■•ed Representa we: Date: 11/28/14 17 I State of FLORIDA ) On this 28 day of November ,2O14 personally appeared before me Joseph Corradir>t, p County of Miami Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President ofThe Corradino Groupa corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Befo e me: --= __ Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: "1- / R IRTHA I MERC ' MY COMMISSION#EEO 5 EXPIRES January 20,2013 0(407)398-053 F;orwalloWrySegrtoe.com AINgiaummataxemsemer 41, RFQ 201 4 346 YG Appendix A- Page 6 -" ________ ....._ ____ , _ _______ _______ _____________________ ez AA I AM I MIAM1BEACH.._ ,, ---..,„_-...- .. .-, ---_. 7,-- , . , ____ ..,_., ,_ RFC, #2414-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that THE CORRADINO GROUP.INC. . is a Kentucky corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on January 13.1997. The document number of this corporation is F97000000207. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2014,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 14.2014,and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Sea!Vibe State of Flotilla at Tallahassee,she Capital,this the Fourteenth(lay ofJantearr, 2014 KK2. 2 t, ?,, ar. t- at,---i::,-1'a __ ______,a4.„.._ .i ' " " * Secretary of State Autheta.katmn ID:CCM17924369 I To animal.e this cettin.tr.visll die following dth,rraer this I ID,and then follow the broth Oland displayed_ napriferdastmbtt.awcertnuthvcr land f 1 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that The Corradino Group, Inc. A-4 -,! - -- is authorized under the provisions of Section 471.023,Florida Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration:2128 2015 CA Lie.No: Audit No: 228201503536 Certificate of Authorization 7665 8 MIAM1BEACH i RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services . in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" ,>`. nE Gntdsd viawu+z lune 1 1,201 4 Joseph it Cotrad'rna,AICP i 10225 SW 58th Court Pine(rect,Fl ii1 S5 The American institute of Certified Planners RE:AICP Certification Verification To Whom It May Concern: i. The I inlr•.0∎mmi In.,titute,IF the American Plain ing A••nciatiun Please accept this letter as confirmation that Joseph M.Corradino.AICP took and passed the Comprehensive Planning examination(CPE1 in May 1 x196.Na is a current member.In good standing.of the American Institute of Certified Planners,the professional institute ht(d)V 111181i ill, of the American Planning Association()SPA).Mr.Corradino has been a member of AICP since July I,1995 and his certification number is 012032. The American Insiaute of Cemfird Plannms :MCP) is the American Planning A ll sslanon s professional institute,providing recognized leadership nationwide in th acrd' Hamilton Be oc certification of professional planners, ethics, professional development; planning animation,and the standards of Manning practice. as a member AICP certified planner's carry a high mark of dl5tvlcticn bleats they are tequced to meet rigorous slatxlaards,maintain their expertise through cuntewing educal-en,and with all she benefits i curve ctminnatiry interests. of a Certified Planner and For more information about the requirements to become an AICP member,please see responsibility to I itc our websioc.rocinit.ulaututtustuatithu, MCP(Ade,Of Et hies Please let as know if we can offer any additional assi stance. and Prr)fpSiicaesa.I Conduct. Sinf.Prnly, APA Customer Service C,:ertrfrerf Ilnlirtrr'turbot,013c85 American Institute of Certified Manners the American Planning Association's Professional Institute ZOS N.Fiachigavt Ave.Suite 1200 July 1.193 Chicago,IL 00601 AICPehcnm"plannrn0r,or0 �''^� 5 -.e. , �- P — eLSa�'i t'I' r:*Jt 1-cwt.namttrOa -- i i4 THE.AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLANNERS ALEX A.DAVID Has quulifted as.: with aft brhrins cIa Cerufrd Plan=and responsibility to the MCP Code of Ethics tnd Professional C,lsdil;r. Membership Corr:Et:ire Number 1)15953 July 1,JU+30 9 nmIAMI BEACH „ - RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" The American institute of Certified Planners Profeorioaol Ineilote of tlio woro•rienn Plerming A.esoeisrino Iierchy qualifies Donald P. Shockey as a me mher wilh all the henen. 4.f.it Certified Manner, and respnusibiliry to the MCP C.Ie or Ethics and Profe5sinual Conduct. Via N bor:I 91157 Potinurr,271. Pa".•<- r . AICP CERTIFIED URBAN DESIGNER EXAMINATION OFFICIAL SCORE REPORT July 23.2014 Donald Shockey,AICP CUD Candidate ID:150357 Test Date:05/27/2014 Test Site:S0070 Scaled Score:60 CONGRATULATIONS! You have passed the AICP Cer urieci Urban Designer Examination(AICP CUD)or the American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP). the professional Institute of the,American Planning Associatioo. The results of the test are not valid for selection pre poses or for employment ranking within the plar lll i l 1y iodustry because the tests are not constructed to dl fret,tttLIaL among candidates except at the Passing score. 10 , • A° M1AM D , • of AC ft ._. .. . . ,..._ ..: . ___ _ . ..... . .. .. . -,. _ • WIFQ on6-B416-16°. Not Woad AnagtedutP awl ERAGt2dR8 $9ft12§ . 6a SM@Hged,'CategodN oa art wak Negai(36§kw ..m. ' .. . 1 . _,._...- ,, - . ,,, -- , - , - , ,-- - . • , -- -- - -• - f I -I LEED I :GREEN: . 1 : ASSOCIATE - 1 GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT I ' ' I I 1 I I ! , I Donald Shockey 1 H41 ATTAINID IRE nitGNATION OF 1 I LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE ny DimosmitATryci nil r-smwitora 4i}uNrotiTAN-5 OP GREEN Run-ONG , PRACTICEE ANO IPIES NiEDE5 To suP?oar THE OH OF THE LIADEREWP IN • ENT-4V MO twvaonkiENTAL DE51GN REED')GREEN Ivan:NG RATING StSTEir. -)Ag.4 ........ _ e 9 1' • rj r-I'3, 0 0 0 ......, Juty 20,2012 _1037.1292 Itilvit 2014-- J--- rl El -.I GBC1 ... • . .. .. . . . . . . _ ... , ., . .. . • __. • ., . . . ,. ... _ ,, . . • .. 11 1 , ni\AIAMI BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" N.:-/Tta tr,Pe '1"4 "Ct Jir JOIN CNIP,a-wwwEsmpswworions, tut = 1"posow. titi cc, -70"--R Member Directory Search ten C Ccii *wt rr Ur iPmn.y) [y.0: • 12 MIAMI BEACH --.......,„.. RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" , . • . \ ( s'4.„_■..„..../,,,, estidarna LI,;-,---;-:---;,'--i PQP-PCBS The Abu Dhabi Urban Planning COIMICii l_iPCI hereby certifies that , Donald Paul Shockey has attained the designation of Pearl Qualified Professional (PCRS) Pat"—,30" June 2011 PQP"•253 By demonstrating competence in applying the Pearl Community Rating System(PCI<S) ±±i ABU 5ARI URBAN PLANNING COUNCIL if ,74')I 1 I State of Fl od Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Salman Aslam Rathore, P.E. ,-4-N is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expirotion: 2128/2015 • P.E Lk.No: Audit No: 2282015087061 75281 13 1 ezMIAMI MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG; Professional Architectural and Engineering Services '' ' , — in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" iyr` EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS The information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in following Standard Form 330. 2.1 Qual1flc fon of Proposing firm Please see Section F of the SF 330 form 2,2 Oudifleaflions of Proposer Team (Archl :ocIs and noIn 9r3) Please see Section D, E and G of the SF 330 form 14 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER PART I—CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Architectural&Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis",Miami Beach,FL 2.PUBLIC NOTICE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NO. September 19,2014 RFQ#2014-346-YG B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Alex A. David,AICP—Project Manager 5.NAME OF FIRM The Corradino Group,Inc. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.EMAIL ADDRESS 305-594-0735 305-594-0755 adavid @corradino.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key sub-consultants.) (Check) ai a 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT � N 0 o > .0 4055 NW 97th Avenue X The Corradino Group,Inc. Suite 200 Planning and Urban Design Miami, FL 33178 b. d. D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM El Attached 15 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART MIAMIBEACH PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE . SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER. Joseph M.Corradino,AICP Alex A. David, AICP PROJECT MANAGER SENIOR PLANNER Jerry H. Bell, AICP Donald A. Shockey, AICP, LEED, GA, CNU-A TRAFFIC ENGINEER URBAN PLANNER PLANNER URBAN DESIGNER PLANNING DIVISION/ PRODUCTION MANAGER Salman.Rathore, P.E. Edward Ng, MPP, MPL Amber Holloway Camilo Lopez Michelle Lopez E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Joseph M.Corradino,AICP Principal-in-Charge a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 19 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.-Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A.(Community Planning)University of Cincinnati, 1992 American Institute of Certified Planner,Florida No. B.A.Villanova University(Geography), 1990 012032 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Qualifications Council Member,Village of Pinecrest, FL Board of Directors,Chamber South Chairman,American Planning Association;Gold Coast Section Executive Board(2005-2007) Chairman, Doral Business Council(2005-2007) Chairman, Planning Board,Pinecrest(2004-2006) Miami-Dade MPO,Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee,(2004-2006) Miami-Dade MPO, Development Permitting Advisory Committee,(2005-2007) Honors and Awards American Planning Association Award for Excellence:Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Study American Planning Association Award for Excellence:Clearwater"One City, One Future"Strategic Plan American Planning Association Award for Outstanding Achievement:Alton Road Traffic Calming American Planning Association Award for Outstanding Achievement: Transportation Concurrency Management Areas Honors and Awards APA Award for Outstanding Mobility Project: Palmetto Bay Transportation Master Plan Florida Redevelopment Association Award:Hialeah Transportation Concurrency Management Areas Mr. Corradino is president of The Corradino Group and heads the company's planning operations in South Florida.In addition to administrative responsibilities,Mr.Corradino works with local and state governments developing policy and strategic planning efforts,including public involvement,charrettes and workshops;transportation,traffic and transit studies;as well as comprehensive plans and mobility studies.Mr.Corradino is a skilled transportation/land use planner,and has more than a decade of experience in the field. His specialty is working with municipalities,in transportation master plans,urban design studies,traffic calming,traffic impact analysis,transit planning,comprehensive planning and growth management/concurrency. He has won six awards from the American Planning Association. He has served as the Chairman of the Village of Pinecrest Planning Board.He also serves on the Miami-Dade County MPO, Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee,(CTAC),the Development Permitting Advisory Committee,(DPAC),and is the Chairman of the Gold Coast Chapter of the American Planning Association and has directed the development of Transportation Master/Mobility Plans for municipalities such as Miami Beach,Doral, Miami Gardens,and Palmetto Bay. 17 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay,General Planning Services PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Cutler Bay, FL(Miami-Dade) SERVICES applicable) 2005-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Shortly after incorporation in 2005,the Town hired Corradino to serve as its initial planning director and planning staff. The firm helped the burgeoning town handle the onslaught of development applications and reviews for its first year or so, until permanent staff could be hired. Once a Planning Director and planners were on board, Corradino served as the general consultant assisting with transportation, planning and civil engineering projects. Corradino has reviewed development applications, produced the Town's Comprehensive Plan,written the Town's Land Development Regulations, provided cost estimates and scopes of services for major roadway reconstruction and paving, produced the Transportation Master Plan,written grants, done individual traffic calming analysis, including road closure recommendations, assisted with the development of Green policies and code regulations,evaluated economic development initiatives along US-1, structured aspects of the Capital Improvements Element,evaluated environmental characteristics of the community, acted as a liaison between the Town and Miami Dade County Public Works, FDOT and the MPO, held public involvement meetings,conducted the US-1 Charrette,as well as developed civil engineering and drainage plans. The firm is available at a moment's notice to assist in any way needed. Corradino serves as the Planning Staff. Cutler Bay is newly incorporated and faces a myriad of issues relative to taking over the planning and zoning tasks from Miami-Dade County, as well as developing a planning department. In doing this job,the firm reviews planning and zoning applications, has re-written land development regulations for an Urban Center District, meets with applicants,develops staff reports,and provided a profession planning staff recommendation at various public meetings. (Total Fees to Date:$1,469,556) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,City of CONSTRUCTION(if PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) Homestead,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2010-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Provide professional planning services on an ongoing basis. Work tasks include: Preparing and processing Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments; Reviewing and processing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Amendments submitted from the public; Preparing periodic studies and reports on technical planning and zoning issues; Preparing graphics and maps related to planning and zoning issues as needed; Coordinating and facilitating neighborhood informational workshops on all appropriate b' applications,such as Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezones; Reviewing land use applications submitted to the City; prepare and submit a complete staff report of the appropriate recommendation to the Local Planning Agency and Council; Reviewing Building Permits for conformance with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan;Advising the City on issues related to the State requirements, specifically related to the requirements which have been placed on local governments with the passage of SB 360(Florida's most recent Growth Management Legislation); Maximizing citizen input utilizing charrette and planning workshops when appropriate;Assisting the City with services related to annexation pursuant to the requirements of Section 20- 3(a)-(f)of the Miami-Dade County Code;Advising the City on creating a concurrency management system; Concurrency Reviews of Development Proposals; and Traffic Impact Analysis. (Total Fees to Date:$634,000) 18 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Village of Palmetto Bay,General Planning Services CONSTRUCTION(if PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) Palmetto Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2008-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm c Principal in Charge: Provide general urban planning,traffic engineering and general NE services including but not limited to:comprehensive planning, land development regulation,charrettes, neighborhood plans, and code enforcement regulations;traffic counts and reports; traffic planning and surveys; and comprehensive traffic analysis, safety analysis, parking studies,traffic intrusion studies, and neighborhood traffic management; building renovations and/or alterations;facility design, and specifications;space planning;cost estimating; construction inspection/construction management; landscape design; and park facility master planning. (Total Fees to Date:$58,537) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade County MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami, CONSTRUCTION(if FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 applicable) 2009 d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Performed planning projects as directed by MPO staff. Projects included public involvement, transportation analysis, high level presentations and consensus building. (Total Fees to Date:$503,880) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral General Planning and Engineering Services, CONSTRUCTION(if { Doral,FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) 2004-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge: Corradino has developed the City's first transportation master plan, reviewed developments e. moving through the public hearing process, reviewed applicants traffic impact analysis, planned, implemented and managed one of the most successful municipal circulator systems,and provided in house staff to assist in day to day planning and engineering functions including general traffic engineering services to include, but not limited to,traffic counts,field observations, roadway capacity/level-of-service(LOS)analyses,traffic surveys, road safety analyses, parking and site plan studies/reviews, review of traffic impact analyses of proposed land developments,etc. (Total Fees to Date: $470,580) • 19 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 2 Alex A.David,AICP Senior Project Manager 29 (Sub-consulting with firm since 2005) 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Fort Laude rdale!Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) MBA,Barry University, 1987 American Institute of Certified Planners, No.015953 BS Geography(Urban Planning),Pennsylvania State University, American Planning Association,No. 116051 1982 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations Former Vice-Chair City of Miami Beach Design Review Board Former Chair Miami-Dade Planners Technical Committee Board of Directors,Gold Coast Section,American Planning Association Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Member,Miami-Dade County MPO Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee Professional Awards/Special Commendations DCA for Hialeah Gardens EAR South Florida Regional Planning Council for Aventura and South Miami EAR processes Treasure Coast RPC for the Village of Royal Palm Beach EAR 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach Development Review and PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Concurrency Management,North Miami Beach, FL(Miami-Dade SERVICES applicable) County) 2010-Present NIA a. ❑ Check if project performed with current (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE firm Project Manager: Review and analyze development applications received by the City in order to evaluate and address impacts to key facilities and services, including transportation, parks, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and schools. (Rate: $125.00/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Illustrative Concept Plan for Downtown, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if North Miami, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Project Manager for The Corradino Group, Mr. David was selected to lead this seven month effort to develop the Illustrative Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown.This focused on generating ideas for strategic b' locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown District(C-3), as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan.This Plan conceptualized new land use patterns, public and private redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, landscape/streetscape enhancements to guide public and private investment.Additionally, urban, landscape,and streetscape design concepts were identified. A variety of graphics including collage renderings, plan,aerial views, and street-level perspectives were prepared to depict concepts.The Concept Plan and graphics provide a visualization of the key elements and recommendations of the Master Plan and will serve as a guide for the long-term coordination of private and 20 public investment.As the ultimate goal,the City envisions the downtown area to be a lively, safe and comfortable area for new and existing residents, businesses and visitors alike. (Project Cost:$43,500) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Parking Inventory and Needs Study,North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Miami, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current c. firm As Senior Project Manager for The Corradino Group, Mr. David was selected to lead this two month effort to develop the Parking Inventory and Needs Study for the Downtown District.This focused on providing strategic locations for parking garages and mixed use parking structures in order to support the future needs of the anticipated development, redevelopment and civic improvements within the boundaries of the Downtown District (C-3). (Project Cost: $15,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Concept Plan for Downtown and Business PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Action Plan,Opa-Locka, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Senior Project Manager for the Corradino Group, Mr. David is preparing the Concept Plan showing new land use patterns, redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, and landscape/streetscape enhancements in the d' CRA district.The document will show options for increasing the height and massing of buildings in the downtown area and CRA districts, as allowed in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Key urban design and architectural styles will be illustrated, including options for wider sidewalks,outdoor dining areas,courtyards, potential parking areas and shade trees. The last Phase of the project is to assist the City in developing a Business Action Plan in order to implement strategies to attract new high quality businesses into the downtown Opa-Locka area. Investigate incentives and strategies, particularly in areas that have been successful and are similar to the City of Opa-Locka. (Project Cost: $25,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Sunny Isles Beach General Planning Services, Miami PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Beach, FL(Miami-Dade County) 2007-Present NIA e. i (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Since 2007, Mr. David has been providing on-call planning and zoning review services including: public hearings, Comprehensive Plan amendments,expert witness services,traffic impact analyses,development review,water supply planning and,temporary planning staff on an as needed basis. (Rate:$125.00/hour) 21 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Jerry H.Bell,AICP Project Manager a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 14 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A. (Urban and Regional Planning),University of Florida, 1992 American Institute of Certified Planners,No.013685 B.A. (Geography), University of Florida, 1989 American Planning Association,No.092548 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations University of Florida Urban and Regional Planning Department Advisory Council,2009-Present Gold Coast Section Florida APA,Board Member and Education Officer 2009-Present Chair,Miami-Dade Planners Technical Committee,Green Initiatives Subcommittee Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Professional Awards/Special Commendations Speaker and Panelist on a number of events at a number of events and conferences,including the 2005 APA Florida Conference, 2014 National APA Conference, 2014 APA Florida Conference, July 2009 South Florida Regional Planning EAR Training Workshop,and August 2009 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council EAR Training Workshop 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Hialeah Gardens EAR and Amendments,Hialeah Gardens,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2011-2012 NIA 200.4-2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm a, Project Manager: Prepared the City of Hialeah Gardens 2004 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.The City's EAR was adopted on schedule, and was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs.The City was recognized as the first municipality in the State to successfully complete the EAR issue scoping process. In 2011-12, prepared the"3rd Round" EAR for the City. (Project Cost: $20,000) —1 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Key West EAR Amendments and Building Permit PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Allocation System, Key West, FL(Monroe County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager: Managed the amendment and update of City of Key West's Comprehensive Plan,the first major update since its adoption. Major focus areas include transportation management, hurricane evacuation, b development and redevelopment, and affordable housing.The Transportation Element was updated with current data and analysis and to reflect current conditions,and transportation levels of service were analyzed and updated.The amended plan was adopted on schedule and found sufficient by the State. Mr. Bell also worked with the City to update its Building Permit Allocation System for the period of 2013-2023.The purpose of this update was to manage the allocation of building permits in a manner that maintains hurricane evacuation clearance times and furthers the achievement of Comprehensive Plan goals,objectives and policies. (Project Cost: $145,800) 22 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach Development Review and PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Concurrency Management,North Miami Beach, FL(Miami-Dade SERVICES applicable) County) 2010-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with G current firm Project Manager: Review and analyze development applications received by the City in order to evaluate and address impacts to key facilities and services, including transportation, parks, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and schools. Review traffic studies submitted with development applications,and provide feedback and analysis. (Rate:$125,00/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Hialeah Gardens Block Grant Consultant,Hialeah PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Gardens, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2000-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager: Serves as the City of Hialeah Gardens'CDBG/HOME Program Consultant,which entails the preparation of funding applications,ongoing coordination with Miami-Dade County's Office of Public Housing and Community Development, project management,and reporting requirements. BDPG is currently managing the rehabilitation of low income homeownership units at Samari Lakes East Condominiums on behalf of the City under a$2,257,000 Home grant. (Rate: $125.00/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Growth Management Plan,Cutler Bay,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2007.2008 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager: Prepared the First Growth Management Plan(Comprehensive Plan)for the Town. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted on-time and found sufficient by the State. The Team was commended for the quality and organization of the Comprehensive Plan,which is being recommended as a model. (Project Cost: $250.000) 23 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Donald Shockey,AICP-CUD,LEED GA, a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM CNU-A Senior Planner 18 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.-Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A.in Public Administration,University of Florida, 1981 Certified Planner and Urban Designer,American Institute B.A.in Political Science,University of Florida, 1980 of Certified Planners 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association,2002-present American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP)certification,2005-present Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)Green Associate certification,2009-present Congress for New Urbanism(CNU)-Associate certification, 2013-present Estidama Pearl Qualified Professional- Community Rating System,2011 -present Vice Mayor,Miami Shores Village Council,Miami Shores Florida,April 2009-April 2010 Miami Shores Village Planning and Zoning Board,October 2002-2004 Miami-Dade Communi Imase Adviso Board 2009-2010 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Fort Lauderdale EAR and EAR Based Amendment Data PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Inventory and Analysis, Fort Lauderdale, FL(Broward County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA a. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:Assess major issues affecting the City, Preparation and adoption of Evaluation and Appraisal, Data, and Analysis Reports to include Transportation, Coastal Management,Conservation, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvement, Parks and Recreation, Historic Preservation, and Climate Change Element Data and Analysis. (Project Cost: $131,200) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Hallandale Beach Citywide Master Plan, Hallandale PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Beach,FL(Broward County) SERVICES applicable) 2008-2009 NIA b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Senior Planner/Project Manager: Led a team of planners, urban designers, landscape architects,economic development analysts, and graphic specialists in developing a transformative plan to recast a sprawling oceanfront automobile-centric city of 40,000 residents into a walkable, sustainable and more liveable community with a hierarchy of city,district, and neighborhood centers. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Tampa Riverwalk Master Plan,Tampa,FL(Hillsborough PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County} SERVICES applicable) 2005-2009 NIA r. - (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Senior Planner/Project Manager: Led a team of planners, urban designers, landscape architects, interpretive and wayfinding specialists,city branding consultants,economic development analysts,civil engineers, biologists,and 24 graphic design specialists in converting a neglected 2.4 mile long urban waterfront into iconic urban amenity that will reconnect a city of 2.8 million people with its scenic waterfront and act as a catalyst for extensive new downtown development.The Tampa Riverwalk will link neighbourhoods,civic and cultural facilities, parks, hotels, and residential developments and serve as a multi-purpose public space featuring public art, interpretive elements,and engaging design features. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Infrastructure and Base Master Planning,Kandahar Air Field, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Afghanistan SERVICES applicable) 2010-2012 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm d. Senior Planner: Managed the work of 5 to 10 urban/community planners working to develop numerous master plans for shared international and Afghan security installations throughout Afghanistan. Analyzed existing transportation, infrastructure, housing,community,security,and airfield installation elements and capacities and planned short and long range development of each element. Managed complex development projects through all phases of the process: needs identification, programming, design,funding,and execution by private construction contractors. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Capital Improvement Projects,Miami Beach, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2000.2005 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Senior Capital Projects Planner: Performed a wide range of senior level analytical, planning, and management tasks related to the identification,design,and construction of capital improvement projects undertaken through a $400 million dollar CIP program encompassing park, recreation, public facility, streetscape, stormwater, and water improvement projects. The successful CIP program is widely acknowledged as having attracted hundreds of millions of dollars of private sector commercial and residential development and cementing Miami Beach's role as a global visitor destination. Managed all aspects of capital project planning,funding,and design. 25 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Salman Rathore,P.E. Traffic Engineer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 10 2 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS(Civil Engineering),National University of Science&Technology, Professional Engineer, Florida, PE No.75281 Risalpur, 1995 MS(Transportation Engineering&Planning), Michigan State University, 1999 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr. Rathore has over 10 years of experience as a planner and traffic engineer and has participated in multiple projects in a variety of fields of discipline.His experience includes traffic impact studies,developments of regional impacts,traffic operations studies, signal/stop warrant analysis,development of traffic signal designs and intersection improvement plans. He is proficient in the use of HCS,S nchro,TGEN and other traffic operations anal sis software. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS I (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay 97th Avenue Street Closure Feasibility Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Cutler Bay, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with a. i current firm Traffic Engineer: Performed traffic operations analysis for the intersections and roadway links in the immediate vicinity of the 97th Avenue in the Town.The analysis was based on the assumption of closing 97th avenue and redirecting traffic through alternative routes. Speed data was also collected and the 85th percentile speed was compared against the posted speed limits to determine if the vehicular traffic will have any negative impacts on the pedestrian safety of the surrounding streets. (Project Cost:$10,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Village of Bal Harbour Traffic Study,Bal Harbour, FL(Miami- PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with b. current firm Traffic Engineer: Conducted traffic operations and pedestrian safety analysis for a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed development located at 10200 Collins Avenue within the Village of Bal Harbour, Florida.The proposed development plan consisted of a 260-unit luxury condominium building, 2,500 square feet of a sit-down restaurant and 4,500 square feet of spa facility on the east side of S.R.A1A/Collins Avenue between Harbour Way East and Harbour Way West in the Village. (Project Cost: $21,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Review of Traffic Impact Study,Miami PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Beach, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash analysis,collision diagrams and capacity analysis. (Rate: $110.00/hour) 26 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Review of Traffic Impact Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Cutler Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-Present NIA d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash analysis,collision diagrams and capacity analysis. (Rate: $110.00/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Village of Palmetto Bay Review of Traffic Impact Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Palmetto Bay, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-Present NIA e. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash anal sis,collision diagrams and casacit anal sis. Rate: $110.00/hour 27 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Edward Ng,MPP,MPL Urban Planner(Town Planning) a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 7 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Public Policy,University of Southern California, Los Angeles,CA 2012 American Planning Association Master of Planning-(Concentration in Economic Development),University of Southern (Affiliation) California, Los Angeles,CA 2012 BA(Planning and Public Policy,Minor in Economics), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,2008 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Graduate Certificates Public Management(USC),2012 Homeland Security and Public Policy(USC),2012 Real Estate Development,Rutgers University,NJ,2011 Housing and Community Development,Rutgers University,NJ,2008 Honors And Awards Editor-in-Chief,Plan On!Trojans Urban Planning and Policy Blog,04/10—05/11 Professional Development Chair, SPPD Asian Pacific Islander Caucus,04/10—05/11 President, Rutgers College Alumni Class of 2008,05/08—05/13 Chair,University Affairs,Rutgers University Student Assembly,04/07—04/08 Outstanding Graduate Student Leader Award,04/12 SPPD Academic Capstone Achievement Award,05/11 Robert Biller Award for Best Performance in the MPP Practicum,05/11 LGBT Service Award, USC,04/11 De.artmental HO Honors, Edward J. Bloustein School of Plannin• and Public Polic ,Rutgers;Dean's List, S•.06—S•.08 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services, Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) . 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I81 Check if project performed with current firm Planner: Evaluates existing ordinances and assists in ordinance revisions as needed. Provides staff reports on ` impact analyses of proposed changes. Ordinance revision and/or review work included Billboard and Paint ordinances. Provides GIS support as needed by client. Performs QA/QC of maps,database updates, and provided ArcGIS technical advice to client. Reviewed site plans and over 100 zoning change ordinances adopted by the City of Homestead between 1993 and 2014 in order to incorporate all zoning changes into an updated and current Zoning map. Reviewed and _ ; updated Future Land Use map. (Rate:$80.00/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Land Development Code Revisions,Opa- PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if b. Locka, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I ® Check if project performed with 28 I current firm Planner: This project involved revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations. Assisted in the writing of the Land Development Code for the City of Opa-locka, a project provided for partially from a HUD grant. In charge of writing the Redevelopment Element and providing support work for the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; provides support work in research and revision of all elements of the LDC to ensure compliance with state regulations regarding mandatory sections and information; provision of all GIS maps for the LDC; assists Opa-Locka in the revision of its Ordinances as requested. Recent ordinance revisions include the Signs Ordinance, Peddlers/Street Vending Ordinance, and the Mixed-Use Overlay District Zoning Ordinance. (Project Cost: $60,000) ~i (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Dora!Transit Mobility Plan, Doral,FL(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2013-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner: This study is evaluating current transportation in Doral to assist the city in improving mobility, and will include an assessment of existing projects and future needs, development of projects, and an implementation c' plan. Work currently involves transportation systems analysis, including review of demographics and trends, the goals and policies of the Doral's Comprehensive Plan, and traffic count and data analyses, and involves field assessment of the urban design and connectivity of the multimodal transit system, as well as public outreach. Currently, this has led to the development of a current and future project needs list to improve multimodal transportation in Doral. Work also includes the utilization of ArcMap and ArcCatalog to conduct geospatial data analysis of existing and needed transit infrastructure improvements and to provide graphical display of mapped project data. This project will also address the spatial requirements of elements necessary for effective, safe and secure multi-modal transportation solutions integrated into normal roadway operations.(Project Cost:$70,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Transportation Master Plan,Cutler Bay,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2013-2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm d. Planner: This project involved an update to the 2008 Transportation Master Plan. Evaluated current traffic counts and created 5 and 20 year projections from Level of Service Analysis. Updated and analyzed existing TIP projects and evaluated policy, land use, demographics, transit, and economic trends as part of analysis. As part of overall analysis, constructed a project list with 63 projects, worth appx. $21 million, and prioritized this list's individual projects into a recommended 5-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Utilized GIS to conduct geospatial data analysis of existing and needed transit infrastructure improvements and to provide graphical display of mapped project data.(Project Cost$70,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County): (2) YEAR COMPLETED Planning and Business Development Consultant;Strategic PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Plan, Downey Art Vibe,Downey,CA SERVICES applicable) 2012.2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm e. Planner: Developed and wrote the 3-5 year business operations and strategic plan leading to the creation of a new Public-Private Partnership between the Downey Art Vibe, a non-profit for the arts,and the city of Downey, as a means to aid the redevelopment of Downtown Downey via introduction of arts and culture. Researched and pursued grant for arts education programming and public art gallery development, leading to procurement of a grant funding 2 years rental costs of the gallery's physical location. Provided additional support to organization via staff training,operations, public meetings with City officials, and community outreach/stakeholder development. 29 . RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Amber Holloway Planner a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 1 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc. Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS(City and Regional Planning),Ohio State University,2013 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Computer Skills ArcGIS Adobe CC Suite Microsoft Office Suite 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Transportation Master Plan Update,Cutler PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Bay, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with a. i current firm Planning Consultant for a Transportation Master Plan Update,Amber completed multiple field studies. She has been actively involved in several Public Participation Workshops.Amber has completed trip analysis studies where she analyzed the bus routes and completed cost/benefit studies. In addition to her analysis,she also wrote the Complete Streets section of the Master Plan. (Rate: $72.12/hour) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services, Homestead,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway is a planner with experience in Comprehensive Planning.As a Planning Consultant for The City of Homestead,Amber handles zoning inquiries, inclusive of research and response b. through a formal letter. She provides the public with current and proposed zoning legislation. She administers the Public and Administrative Hearing Process and is responsible for taking in all development applications, distributing to Planners and Department heads, keeping both the applicant and planners on schedule for the Hearings and produce meeting minutes. She is currently acting as the Clerk to the Planning&Zoning Board, Historic Preservation Board, Development Review Committee and the Art in Public Places Committee. She produces visual aids through GIS mapping for project specific locations. She actively assists in the Site Plan Review Process.Amber has participated in amending land development regulations with respect to setback standards and commercial development regulations.Amber conducted research and drafted a Construction Values report which will be utilized by the local Chamber of Commerce. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services, Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present c. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway wrote the update report for the Community Rating System, Fiscal Year 2014. ,r This report requires collaboration between the Building Department and Planning Department to provide 30 necessary information to the citizens of Homestead regarding flooding. By providing detailed information about flooding and prevention, and annually completing the report,the City of Homestead is enables its citizens to obtain lower Flood Insurance rates. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services, Homestead,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway completed the background research for three Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Homestead Downtown CRA. She collected zoning and land use information for properties as well as completed the ArcGIS mapping for the projects. (Project Cost: more than$60.6 million) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services, Homestead,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE IN Check if project performed with current firm Historic Preservation Officer: Ms. Holloway is the acting Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Homestead. This position entails the review and approval of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness and clerking all Historic Preservation Board meetings. Ms. Holloway is also responsible for the writing and presentation of the staff reports for Certificate of Appropriateness applications to the Board and Development Services Staff. 31 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Camilo Lopez Urban Designer a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 3 2 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A.in Urban and Planning,Florida Atlantic,2014-Present B.A.in Architecture, Florida Atlantic University,2014 B.A.in Urban Design,Florida Atlantic University,2014 A.A.in Architecture,Broward College,2011 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) "Downtown Phenomenology"research case study 1st Prize-School of Urban and Regional Planning,2014 All School Innovative Design Charette Competition Award Honorable Mention-School of Architecture,2013 State Rd 7/441 Comprehensive Master Plan-Best Performance Award-South Regional Planning Council,2013 LEED Certified Neighborhood Assessment-Visconti Neighborhood Plan Best Performance,2012 National Concrete Masonry Competition—1st Prize Award-School of Architecture,2012 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Concept Plan for Downtown and Businees PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Action Plan,Opa-Locka, FL(Miami-Dade County) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Urban Planner: This project is evaluating current social,economical and ecological conditions of Downtown Opa-Locka and generates a vision based on community,city,and private input. Provides community a. development support to Opa-Locka City Center CRA Plan by implementing design concept guidelines to improve the city's vision and provide comprehensive streetscape improvements, land use allotment, mobility systems, architectural features,and economic development mechanism through design. In 2030,the City will be a successful and financially stable full-service community that offers ample economic opportunities to residents, { boasts a vibrant and distinctive Downtown and healthy neighborhoods, and provides excellent services and a great quality of life to residents, businesses and visitors. (Project Cost:$25,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Land Development Regulations,Opa-Locka,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Urban Planner:This project involves an update to the existing zoning configuration of the City of Opa-Locak. b. Provides design guidelines to support The City of Opa-Locka Land Development Regulations Renewal Plan by implementing graphical depictions to improve readability of the building form, setbacks, building heights, right-of- way, landscape,density levels, land uses,overhangs, parking and provide comprehensive visualization of zoning requirements. (Project Cost: $60,000) 32 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Transit Mobility Plan, Doral,FL(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:This study is evaluating current transportation in Doral to assist the City in improving mobility, and will c' include an assessment of existing projects and future needs,development of projects, and an implementation plan. Provides graphical support to Doral Transit Mobility Plan by implementing proposed mobility upgrades on map sheets to improve the city's comprehension of future needs, project cost charts,trolley routes,express bus lanes, shared-off road paths,crosswalk stripping, bus shelter installations, pedestrian islands,ADA compliance, bicycle signalization programs, bicycle rest areas, mid-block crossing and other road features with an implementation plan. (Project Cost: $70,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Downtown North Miami Parking Study-North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Miami,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:This study is evaluating current parking supply in Downtown North Miami to assist the city in improving d' long range parking capacity infrastructure, including an assessment of existing conditions and future needs, development of projects, priorities, estimated cost, supply and demand forecast,and an implementation plan. This Parking Study has been prepared, based on and as a supplemental report to the Illustrative Concept Plan for Downtown,the Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan,the Comprehensive Plan and allowances for development in the Downtown under the City's existing Land Development Regulations. (Project Cost: $15,000) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Downtown North Miami Concept Plan-North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Miami, Florida(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:This report evaluated the physical and sociological conditions in Downtown North Miami to assist the city in improving long range visions, and included an assessment of existing conditions and future needs, e. development of projects, priorities,estimated cost, key civic spaces,streetscape improvements,street furniture enhancements, land use composition, higher density forecast, lively community concept, mixed-use activities and provide a comprehensive visualization of based on a participatory input. The Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown focused on generating ideas for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown District(C-3), as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan. (Project Cost: $43,500) - 33 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Michelle M.Lopez Planning Division Manager a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 10 <1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group, Inc.—Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.A. Public Administration,(Minor in Political Science and Certificate Real Estate Sales Associate,Florida, No.SL3143948, in Public Policy),Florida International University,2011 2005-Present MBA(Business Administration), Florida International University,2014 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Registration Real Estate Sales Associate, Florida, No. SL3143948, 2005-Present Professional Affiliations American Planning Association 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Planning Division Manager,The Corradino Group,Inc.,Miami,FL. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Manages the general business operations of the Planning Division including marketing, business development, staff utilization, monthly business planning, work-in-process management, financial reporting and analysis, and the overall growth of the Division. Works with Staff to ensure quality client service and efficiency is consistent and maintained. Collaborates closely with production, marketing, human resources, senior management and a. executive management. Works with multidiscipline staff of professionals to identify and pursue business prospects, coordinating proposals and supporting materials for new business opportunities. Provides technical support to staff and clients, as it relates to land development regulations, comprehensive planning, code interpretations, and business management. Manages client deliverables and Division profitability, conducts QA/QC of working drafts, and distributes work to qualified staff and appropriate personnel. Responsibilities include writing proposals, interviewing, contract negotiations, project work planning, coordinating with other Division Managers and Project Managers, supervision of executed work, and ensuring quality and timeliness of deliverables. Also serves as Division Manager for Production Division, ensuring companywide deliverables are produced in a timely manner, in accordance with client's needs and expectations. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED • City of Homestead Zoning Administrator,Homestead FL.(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Reviewed applications for entitlement,enforcing the City's land development code and comprehensive plan, and evaluated projects for community impact and feasibility. Met with applicants, land use attorneys, and developers, and provided City Code and Comprehensive Plan information and interpretations. Reviewed applications for site plan, variances, special exception permits, land use and zoning changes; prepared staff reports and made recommendations to the Development Review Committee(DRC), Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. Represented Department during quasi-judicial and legislative hearings. Reviewed building permit applications for 34 compliance with zoning, landscaping, and sign codes, comprehensive plan, and adopted ordinances and resolutions. Made recommendations for updating the land development code and comprehensive plan. Conducted administrative oversight of Development Services Department Staff of eight. Managed contracts for Building Department and Planning Department, Department budget and expenditures, and Capital Improvement Projects(CIP). (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Development/Construction/Estimating Consultant,BCM Construction PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Management,Miami,FL. 2010-2011 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Reviewed scopes of work and construction documents for bid. Coordinated project teams for bid response. • Developed job estimates for commercial, municipal, and county clients, requests for bid, request for proposal, and request for qualification through the use of historical data, take-off analysis, and subcontractor bid comparisons. Coordinated project teams and maintained competitive bidding practices for negotiating subcontractor proposals. Drafted, issued, and executed contacts, scopes of work, and project schedules. Reviewed awards and contracts for scope of services, scheduling, costs, and legal sufficiency. Maintained database of subcontractor contact information, license and insurance, and resumes, including project history and qualifications. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Director of Planning&Construction,10 Minute Manicure,Miami,FL. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) 2007-2009 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Evaluated and recommended site locations for retail and service expansion throughout the US and Canada. Exclusively managed the planning, design, value engineering, and construction of retail, street, mall, and airport locations from conceptual through occupancy. Implemented real estate, planning, development, construction, and facilities operations practices for franchisee program. Selected, negotiated, and managed contracts for design team, contractors, and fixture vendors. Responsible for the design and development of space plans; the preparation of department and multi-store location construction budgets, schedules, and cost estimates; and the coordination and securing of design and plan approvals, permits, and inspections with airports, landlords, and regulatory agencies. Competitively bid, selected, and negotiated contractors for site construction. Purchased fixtures, furnishings, and equipment component selections, ensuring the company brand image was maintained a corporate wide. Achieved a twenty percent reduction of production costs through value engineering. Served as on-site project manager, supervising construction, installations, and inspections. Reviewed and approved invoices, tracked change orders, and negotiated pricing. Managed facilities, including existing store life cycles, maintenance, retrofits, and remodels. Developed and maintained knowledge of landlord-tenant and regulatory requirements for design, construction and maintenance of facilities. Worked in conjunction with marketing team to execute graphics program, including logo, signage, and exterior and interior graphics treatments. Domestic projects developed in: Miami International Airport, South Terminal; John F. Kennedy International Airport, American Airlines Terminal 8, and Delta Airlines Terminal 3; Dulles International Airport, Concourse D; Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Terminals B & C; Blue Grass Airport; South Florida International Airport; Downtown Miami, Miami, FL; Mall of America, Bloomington, MN (Clear Smile Kiosk). International projects developed in Pearson International Airport, Toronto, ON Canada, Piers 1 & 3; Ottawa MacDonald-Cartier International Airport, Ottawa, ON Canada, and West Edmonton Mall, Edmonton,AB Canada. 35 Project Coordinator/Assistant Project Manager,The Green PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Companies,Miami,FL. SERVICES applicable) 2005-2007 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Analyzed and managed regulatory affairs and reporting for Development and Construction Departments. Secured land entitlements and development permits for construction in conjunction with environmental impact reports, traffic studies and development plans for proposed projects. Coordinated and co-managed competitive bidding, purchasing, and contracts for tenant improvements. Researched land development regulations, comprehensive plans,and Florida Building code,and coordinated project activities with government regulatory or other governmental agencies. Served as Project Administrator for Private-Public Partnership joint developments between Developer and Miami-Dade County, owner's representative during regulatory proceedings, and point of contact for design professionals and sub-contractors. Assisted in contract negotiations for development agreements, construction contracts, joint ventures, and other investments. Liaised between Owner, Contractor(s), Design Professionals, and the County, Municipalities, and Cities, and served as Owners Representative during Miami-Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals proceedings. Projects included high- rise, mixed-use,office, retail, and apartment buildings such as: Development and Construction, Government Affairs, Regulatory Compliance: Towers of Dadeland I and Dadeland Centre II Design, Government Affairs, &Pre-construction:Towers of Dadeland II Tenant Improvements & Regulatory Compliance: Dadeland Centre I, The Greenery Mall, Dadeland Square Office Park, Dadeland,West Office Park,Westland Executive Office Park,and Dadeland Vista Apartments Affordable Housing:Chelsea Commons Apartments and Green Vista Apartments 36 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 1 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami,Illustrative Concept Plan for Downtown PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) North Miami, FL 2014 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of North Miami Tanya Wilson-Sejour,Planning Manager 305.893.6511 Ext.12182 Community Planning and Development Email:tsejour @northmiamifl.gov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group was selected to lead this seven month effort to develop the Illustrative Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown. This focused on generating ideas for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundari es of the Downtown District (C-3), as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan. This Plan conceptualized new land use pattern s, public and private redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, landscape/streetscape enhancements to guide public and private investment. Additionally, urban, landscape, and streetscape design concepts were identified. A variety of graphics in cluding collage renderings, plan, aerial views, and street-level perspectives were prepared to depict concepts. The Concept Plan and graphics provide a visualization of the key elements and recommendations of the Master Plan and will serve as a guide for the long-term coordination of private and public investment. As the ultimate goal, the City envisions the downtown area to be a lively, safe and comfortable area for new and existing residents, businesses and visitors alike. Project Cost: $43,500 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group,Inc. Miami, FL Project Manager/Planning Services 37 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami,Parking Inventory and Needs Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) North Miami,FL 2014 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of North Miami Arthur Sorey,CRA Coordinator 305.895.9839 Communi Redevelopment Agenc Email:asore • northmiamifl.•ov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group was selected to lead this two month effort to develop the Parking Inventory and Needs Study for the Downtown District. This focused on providing strategic locations for parking garages and mixed use parking structures in order to supp ort the future needs of the anticipated development, redevelopment and civic improvements within the boundaries of the Downtown District(C-3). Project Cost: $15,000 25.ARMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group, Inc. Miami, FL Planning Services 38 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Transportation Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Doral, FL 2005;2014 NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Doral Mr.Jose Olivo,JR., Project Engineer 305.593.6740 E-mail: 'ose.olivo• cit ofdoral.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) In 2005, as a new municipality, Doral was trying to develop and upgrade its transportation mobility infrastructure in a multimodal manner. The City needed this type of plan to prove to the Miami-Dade County Commission that they had an organized plan to deal with transportation, so that funds could be obtained from the Peoples Transportation Plan. This plan focused on an intensive public involvement process which would build consensus on projects developed in the areas of roadway capacity, alternative modes, and transportation demand management. A set of 27 projects was developed in these areas. The City the implemented all of the projects. In 2014, The Corradino Group completed a comprehensive rewrite and update of the Plan and which was renamed the Transit Mobility Plan. Project Cost:$90,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a' The Corradino Group, Inc. Miami, FL Transportation Planning 39 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka,Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Rewrite 2014 NIA 0•a-Locka, FL 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Opa-Locka Gregory Gay,Director 305.953.2868 Communi Redevelo•ment E-mail: ••a • o•alockafl.•ov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group was selected to lead this year long effort to rewrite both the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs). Both documents are currently being revised to update and create more user friendly formats with additional graphics for ease of understanding. The Comprehensive Plan is a total revision while parts of the current LDRs will be utilized. The LDRs will be reorganized as part of the endeavor. Project Cost: $131,600 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C IN VOLVE D WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Grou Inc. Miami, FL Project Mana•erlPlannin• Services 40 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka,Concept Plan for Downtown and Business Action Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 0•a-Locka, FL 2014-Present N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Opa-Locka Newall Daughtrey,Community 305.953.2868 Redevelo•ment A•enc E-mail: ndau•htre • o•alockacra.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This two phased project includes: Preparation of the Illustrative Concept Plan showing new land use patterns, redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, and landscape/streetscape enhancements in the CRA district. The document will show options for increasing the height and massing of buildings in the downtown area and CRA districts, as allowed in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Key urban design and architectural styles will be illustrated, including options for wider sidewalks, outdoor dining areas, courtyards, potential parking areas and shade trees. The last Phase of the project is to assist the City in developing a Business Action Plan in order to implement strategies to attract new high quality businesses into the downtown Opa-Locka area. Investigate incentives and strategies, particularly in areas that have been successful and are similar to the City of Opa-Locka. Project Cost:$25,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Grou•, Inc. Miami, FL Project Mana•er/Plannin• Services 41 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 6 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Key West EAR Amendments PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Key West,FL 2012-2013 NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Key West Donald Craig, Planning and Zoning 305.809.3720 Director Email:dcrai. • ci ofke est-fl.•ov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group was selected to amend and update the City of Key West's Comprehensive Plan, the first major update since its adoption. Major focus areas include transportation management, hurricane evacuation, development and redevelopment, and affordable housing. The Transportation Element was updated with current data and analysis and to reflect current conditions, and transportation levels of service were analyzed and updated. The amended plan was adopted on schedule and found sufficient by the State. Project Cost: $145.800 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C I NVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group, Inc. Miami, FL Plannin• Services 42 G.KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing table. Place"X"under project key number for participation in Planning and Urban Design same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Joseph M. Corradino, principal-in-Charge X X AICP Alex A. David, AICP Project Manager X X X X X Jerry H. Bell, AICP Project Manager X X X X Donald P. Shockey, AICP Senior Planner X X CUD, LEED-GA, CNU-A Salman Rathore, P.E. Transportation Planning X Edward Ng Transportation Planning Services and X X g GIS Amber Holloway Associate Planner X X Camilo Lopez GIS and Graphics X X X X X • Michelle Lopez Staff and Production Management X X X 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE AND EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE AND EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 North Miami Concept Plan 6 Key West EAR Amendments 2 North Miami Parking Study _ 7 3 Doral Transportation Master Plan 8 4 Opa Locka Comp.Plan and LDRs 9 5 1 Opa Locka Concept and Business Plans 10 43 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. CORRAL'N0 WiMS TAAMfi.AWARD ,' Tho Corrod;no Group was awarded the rEAMFL Chairman's Award TEAMEL is the Transportation and Expressway Authority membership of Florida,(basically FOOT,the Expressway Authorities and the private sector).The Chairman's Award goes to the most innovative and creative tronsponotion project in the Sta.of Florida.The Corradino Group's presemotion on the 1-95 Express lanes Project was chosen os the most;nnovati.e protect that addresses transportation need while providing envuomen- tot benefits Corroding is on the cutting edge of;nnavative tronsponation solutions for relieving traffic congestion - in heavily urbanised communities such os South Florida Innowti.e salutiona Ike this require o copal, amine Team effort for which Corrodino is well known The success of this project required the coordt- notion and porrk■pohon of USDOT(FHWA),FOOT,the Florida legislature and local governments To fund this project.Corradino assisted FOOT in applying for and obtaining a 5 e 2.9 million federal grant ham USDOT s Urban Partnership Agreement(UPA),and o S 35 million store leg;sbti.e oppropr;o• ' ion In addition to assisting with the de - _ , wlap- mem anti implememotion of the overall sotnragteg ;Cngm,mno h pe rqr,f pmed t 1n1 cpy boonirndg CORRAL/NO notion,and public in.ohement necesserY to comply with the UPA requirements. Subsequent to the UPA oppl.cotion,Cor- ` rodino completed a Project Develpment - ) end Emdranment (POSE) Study, and t ti, obtained location and Design ' '11 - Concept Acceptance (COCA) in four t._ ' 1� -. , IC months when the process typically {i _- • requires',Omen 11 81 to twenty-four 04) �,I months,As the Environment(POSE)Study• '- and obtazd location and Design ' Concept Aueatance (COCA) in lour (4)months when the process typically -' requtns eighteen('8)to twenty•four(24) .. " months-As the projec progresses jn Ilia Design-Build phes•,Cotrodino is - - com nut tp Io orovide Public Involvement "" Sitv;ces for this high profile project Mike Calucci(len and Mite Chun(right)of Conodira Evidence of our reliability and dependability to manage the budget and quality of our work "Joe.I wanted to say thank you from the bottom of my heart for the hard work that Harv,Juanita,Guy,Mark V, and you did to make Last week's DRIC Relocation Meetings were an incredible success.I am so proud of your team. You shine no matter how difficult the challenge is!I have heard many 11DDTers say the nicest thing about your awesome team!Heart felt from 11-1DOT to our extended team at Corradtno's Mohammed" —Note from the Project Manager to Joe Corradino related to the Detroit International Crossing project, a federal mega project "I want to sad;that I thought this was an excellent,excellent job, and I commend you, Jeff,and all the people that were involved...this is an excellent document... I think this will he very,very helpful in achieving that balance...an excellent job—through the balancing things out through chapter by chapter... impressed by how little serious discontent there was...vast majority,•,Really good document,.. With regard to the school...1 think your recommendations there are excellent... With regard to economic development,again I think you did a wonderful job on balancing out the different issues that are here..." —Transcript of Commissioner Cooney's Public Comments,Kalamazoo Comprehensive Plan "Yes, because of their sincere and transparent approach to involving a variety of•points of view...This approach, couple with a commitment to creative problem solving, comes from the top, and continues throughout the organization." —Ann Arbor Planning Manager Wendy Rampson,when asked "Why would you hire Corradino again?" I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE I i0t 32.DATE i ,, if ' 11/28/14 33.NAME AND TITLE I Joseph M.Corradino,AICP-President 44 SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ#2014-346-YG PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FRIM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABILISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER The Corradino Group,Inc. 1970 04-665-6815 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 4055 NW 97th Avenue,Suite 200 a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Miami FL 33178 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Joseph M.Corradino,President 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.594.0735 jmcorradino @corradino.com 8a.FORMER NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9. EMPLYOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.FUNCTION C.NO. OF EMPLOYEES a.FUNCTION c.REVENUE INDEX NUMBER(See CODE b.DISCIPLINE (1) b.EXPERIENCE FIRM (2)BRANCH CODE below) 02 Administrative 30 15 B02 Bridges 1 06 Architect 1 C15 Construction Management 6 08 CADD Technician 3 3 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost 1 Engineering and Analysis; Parametric Costing;Forecasting 12 Civil Engineer 27 5 E02 Educational Facilities; Classrooms 14 Computer 2 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies; 6 Programmer Assessments or Statements 15 Construction 35 25 E10 Environmental and Natural 1 Inspector Resource Mapping 16 Construction 1 E11 Environmental Planning 2 Manager 21 Electrical Engineer 1 E13 Environmental Testing and 2 Analysis 23 Environmental GO6 Graphic Design 1 Engineer 24 Environmental 2 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield 5 Scientist Paving;Parking Lots 29 Geographic 106 Irrigation;Drainage 1 Information 3 1 System Specialist 30 Geologist P05 Planning(Community,Regional, 4 Areawide and State) 38 Land Surveyor 1 P06 Planning(Site,Installation,& 3 Project) 47 Planner: 12 8 RO3 Railroad;Rapid Transit 2 Urban/Regional 48 Project Manager 13 6 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment 3 and Disposal 58 Technician/Analyst S10 Surveying;Platting;Mapping; 2 Flood Plain Studies 60 Transportation 10 2 T02 Testing and Inspection Services 1 Engineer TO3 Traffic and Transportation 3 Engineering TO6 Tunnels and Subways 1 Total 141 67 45 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ` PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert Revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work n/a 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 4. 500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 10 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE: ° 32.DATE 11/28/14 33.NAME AND ( Joseph M.Corradilo,AICP-President • 1 46 MIAMI BEAC H RFQ tt2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed Basis" ?-'incncicii Ccipc]clty From:Bullington,Larry[mailto:BullingtonL@dnb.comj Sent:Thursday,October 30,201410:44 AM To:Alexis Mattey;yusbelgonzalez@miamibeachflgov Cc:Bullington,Larry Subject:RE:Assistance Needed-SQR to be sent to the City of Miami Beach,Attn:Yusbel Gonzalez Yusbel here is Supplier Qualifier Report for CORRADINO GROUP,INC,THE. Larry Builirton Relations.hip Ke.nag,ar Dun&Eradstreet S&L Government Solutions 2551D 1-iickcry BIL-ff Lane, Jacksonville: Fl '32223 T;g-TA---252-9515,SC-3---ggg-313•67 ext.z5spga F:965-6c3-32C:4■:=3:ga4-4-1)3-g741 bullingtortl@dnb.com Questf-ens rzr c_ c:.z?1.800.424.2495 ST.:72 to Crr .17.a Ot:t tt oti www.dnb.com/gov 47 MIAMJBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN Corradino has extensive successful experience with the Planning and Urban Design services being sought through this City of Miami Beach RFQ as well as the "as-needed" method by which the services will be provided. The firm typically works for local municipalities as their general engineering or planning services provider. Specific tasks are then completed in response to the evolving needs of the client as they arise. Under this contractual arrangement, Corradino has provided municipal clients with a wide spectrum of Planning and Urban Design services including district, redevelopment, master and corridor plans, and streetscape, public space, compatibility with historic districts, and special area or element urban design studies. The firm's Planning and Urban Design assignments have typically included an initial research and site visit stage followed with a comprehensive planning or design analysis, recommendations and presentations, and a completed plan or design. On each of these projects Corradino has been responsible for developing a scope of services and project methodology, collecting and analyzing the data, identifying constraints, opportunities, and options, and then fully developing a consensus option. Projects have always required developing sophisticated graphic supporting materials to enable the public, staff, and decision makers to understand and visualize the results and recommendations. Most projects have also entailed developing materials and conducting public meetings or workshops to obtain necessary public input. The Corradino approach to providing the Planning and Urban Design services requested through this RFQ will consist of being prepared, responsive, effective and efficient. Corradino is accustomed to working on task order based contracts with large and undefined scopes of services and has the personnel, knowledge and resources to successfully complete each work assignment issued by the City of Miami Beach The Project Team as led by Mr. Joseph M. Corradino, AICP is prepared to respond to the City's Planning and Urban Design task requests on an immediate basis. Upon receiving a task request from the City, Mr. Corradino along with Alex A. David, AICP, Senior Project Manager, will develop a scope of services, deliverables, timeline and price for completing the task request. A Task Team will be developed for each task request and will consist of staff members with the strongest experience in the subject area of the task request. Detailed information on the Task Team will be provided to the City Project Manager who will be continuously informed on the status of all assigned work. 48 MIAMI BEAC H RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" Work will begin upon receipt of a written notice to proceed, and will be completed on-time and within budget. Corradino recommends regular meetings with the City Project Manager throughout the course of the project to ensure clear communication on project expectations and deliverables. Each task request will have a Senior and a Technical Project Manager assigned to them as the Point of Contact (POC) who will handle the day to day operations of the assignment. These Project Managers will work closely with City Project Manager to ensure the assignment is being handled in the most efficient, accurate and responsive manner. The Technical Project Manager, working with the relevant input from the Task Team, will collect all data, assign and manage all analysis work, develop conclusions and recommendations, and prepare reports and presentations as specified in each deliverable. The Technical Project Managers will work closely with Mr. David to ensure that excellent quality control is maintained on all aspects of the project. Detailed Approach to City's Requirements Staff provided by Corradino are proactive, self-starting, well-educated and ambitious professionals who thrive working independently or as part of a team. Each has been vetted through a process matching their experiences, personalities and capabilities with the firm's and clients' needs. Both public and private sector planning responsibilities present unique challenges and the ability to handle those challenges effectively will create a highly responsive and professional planning and zoning department. Planning and Urban Design Planning and Urban Design services are understood to include the preparation of redevelopment plans, special area and district plans, site plans, master plans, streetscape and corridor plans, urban design framework studies, urban design concept development, urban design regulation and code development, park and public space design, massing and form studies, three dimensional modeling, and other similar scale planning and urban design work as distinguished from Comprehensive/Long Term Plans. Corradino has excelled at providing these Planning an Urban Design services as seen in the experience of our staff and our similar work for other cities. Corradino and our staff also bring to the table the state of the art thinking and practices in sustainability, walkability, urban forms, and liveability that inform the best Planning and Urban Design projects in the industry. Corradino is also very experienced at navigating all of the steps of completing these kinds of Planning and Urban Design projects which typically involve identifying the task, conducting extensive research and in person site analysis, developing and illustrating design concepts and plan elements, presenting concepts to the public, City staff, boards and officials, and obtaining official approval of the completed plans or designs. 49 MIAM1 BEACH RFQ #2414-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" We invite you to call the references submitted below and inquire about our work ethic and performance. We commit to providing our services on-time and within budget. Why Corradino? Corradino has completed extensive work on similar Planning and Urban Design tasks for multiple cities and agencies in South Florida. A partial description of relevant project experience is provided below as well as in the additional Project Sheets included for your review: Miami Beach Corradino has completed General Planning Contracts providing a variety of services which have included: • Developing and implement urban design aspects of development regulations • Creative development of urban design concepts which reflect the most current aspects of sustainability, walkability, and livability • Streetscape and drainage design for the North Shore and Biscayne Point Neighborhoods • Design and construction management of Flamingo Park and North Shore Park • The Miami Beach Mobility Plan • Urban Design Charrettes for North Beach area • Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan Presentations to the Transportation and Parking Committee, Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council Miami Corradino has produced numerous streetscape and corridor planning projects for the City all of which included Planning and Urban Design elements. Corradino worked on the master planning for the Flagler Street Corridor, the Performing Arts Center, and the master planning for the Mary Brickell Village area. Cutler Bay Corradino Services provided include master planning, including an award winning transportation master plan, bicycle and pedestrian master plan. The firm has assisted in the design and construction management of various streetscape and drainage projects. 50 MIAM1BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" Corradino conducted an interactive charrette process to review existing land use and develop a new urban design framework along the US-1 corridor. After completing a review of previous plans, an interview with stakeholders was held. A one-day workshop was conducted in which multiple urban design issues were addressed by the citizens, staff and elected officials. Subsequently the consultant team developed a multi-area plan, architectural rendering and urban design element implementation strategies. A highly graphic charrette document was then produced. Homestead Corradino is currently providing Development Services Director and staff services and managing a staff of over a dozen planners, engineers and inspectors. This work includes ensuring compliance with all development regulations many of which have urban design elements as well as developing the Downtown Master Plan. Corradino is also working to implement the City's Art in Public Places ordinance, managing the Public Art Committee, developing the Public Art Master Plan and administering to the Public Art Fund. North Miami Corradino was selected to lead this seven month effort to develop the Illustrative Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown. This focused on generating urban design concepts for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown District (C- 3), as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan. This Plan conceptualized new land use patterns, public and private redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, landscape/streetscape enhancements to guide public and private investment. Additionally, urban, landscape, and streetscape design concepts were identified. A variety of graphics including collage renderings, plan, aerial views, and street-level perspectives were prepared to depict concepts. The Concept Plan and graphics provide a visualization of the key elements and recommendations of the Master Plan and will serve as a guide for the long-term coordination of private and public investment. As the ultimate goal, the City envisions the downtown area to be a lively, safe and comfortable area for new and existing residents, businesses and visitors alike. Opa Locka Corradino was selected to lead this several month effort to develop the Concept Plan for the Downtown. This focused on generating ideas for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown. This Plan will conceptualize new land use patterns, public and private redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, landscape/streetscape enhancements to guide public and private investment. A variety of graphics including collage renderings, plan, aerial views, and street-level perspectives are being prepared to 51 MIAM1 B EAC H RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" depict concepts. The Concept Plan and graphics provide a visualization of the key elements and recommendations and will serve as a guide for the long-term coordination of private and public investment. As the ultimate goal, the City envisions the downtown area to be a lively, safe and comfortable area for new and existing residents, businesses and visitors alike. Palmetto Bay Corradino provides review of development applications particularly related to traffic impact analysis. Corradino also performs master planning, including an award winning transportation master plan, bicycle and pedestrian master plan, and safe routes to school studies. Coral Gables Services provided by Corradino under a General Engineering and Planning contract have included planning, design and construction management for numerous streetscape, drainage and infrastructure projects, including the Miracle Mile Streetscape enhancement, all of which had significant urban design elements. 52 8 f FDu:"T , Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 605 Suwannee Street ANANTH PRASAD,P.E. GOVERNOR Tallahassee,FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY February 7, 2014 MR. JOSEPH CORRADINO,PRESIDENT THE CORRADINO GROUP 4055 NW 97TH AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33178 Dear Mr. Corradino: I want to thank you personally for your conscientious efforts during the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year to use Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) on Department of Transportation funded projects. The State of Florida achieved 11.78%exceeding the 8.60% DBE goal established for the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year. Your company was instrumental in the achievement of the state's goal. The actual percentage reported for your company is 28.05% on 13 project(s). This results in a DBE utilization grade of A+. Your efforts are commendable and show a commitment to being a supportive partner in our efforts to ensure minority and female owned firms have the opportunity to obtain work on transportation projects in Florida. I encourage you to continue with these efforts that not only strengthen the overall economy of the State,but also strengthen the transportation industry. you with any assistance in the DBE Program,please If the Department can provide y y gr ,p contact Art Wright, Manager Equal Opportunity Office at(850) 414-4749 or arthur.wrightgdot.state.fl.us. Also,you can visit the EOO website at www.dolstate.flusiequalopportunityoffice/usfequalupportunityoffice/to view the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year grading scale and reporting criterion. Thank you again. Si :rely, CrtiAj' 11 P Ananth Prasad, P.E. Secretary AP:aw 5 www.got.state.fl.us )‘' SUBMITTED TO: fT AA I AM I BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" December 2, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: THE ^ -,.`-r4 GROUP GROUP A - Town Planning _ __•{' _;Engineers.Planners.Piogram M1fanagers•EnvironmenralScientiss THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC. O ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • PROGRAM MANAGERS • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS Z 0 w December 2nd, 2014 ce 0 U Mr. Alex Denis Procurement Director City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ#2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" GROUP A—Town Planning Dear Mr. Denis and Selection Committee Members: Running a municipality in this era is a complex assignment; doing so while exceeding community expectations can be aided by a close partnership with trusted consultants. In today's world it is a necessity to have a consultant team which has the flexibility to supply professionals of the highest caliber to work in seamless coordination with the City. These consultants must understand how municipalities work in general, but also have specific and detailed knowledge and understand the unique characteristics of each City. Additionally, consultants must be available on call to provide services. The Corradino Group, Inc. (Corradino) proudly submits this proposal to assist the City of Miami Beach with its Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering Services. Corradino has specifically tailored its municipal services department for these types of contracts. Corradino has been a leader in producing high quality studies, analyses and presentations to elected bodies since 1971, but over a decade ago, the firm re-structured its business plan to provide local municipalities with the same quality of service that the private sector or large state and federal agencies receive. Corradino focuses on public sector clients, to assure there are never conflicts of interest by having worked for or desiring to work for an applicant to the process. You can be assured that Corradino is your advocate. Because of this we feel we are best qualified to assist the City on this contract. Corradino understands that the City is searching for qualified consultants in numerous fields to deal with architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as needed- basis". The firm is applying for the area of Town Planning. This may include the technical tasks of codes, standards, ordinances, zoning, land use and other studies and, potentially development review. Corradino has held a similar contract with the City for the past several years and has a detailed understanding of the work to be done. 4033 NW 97TH AVENUE SUITE 200• MIAMI. FL 33178 TEL 800.887.5551 305.594.0735 FAX 305. 94.0755 WWW.CORRADINO.COM Additionally, the Corradino staff has served as department directors, staff, consultants and elected officials for more than 30 cities across the region.The firm, and the individuals assigned to this project, has won multiple awards for their work on similar general services contracts, including cities such as Miami Beach, Miami Gardens, Hialeah, Sarasota, Clearwater, and Palmetto Bay. Corradino understands local governments. The Corradino core philosophy is to produce its work on-time and within budget at the highest quality. The firm understands the demands of today's municipal environments. Our approach has been to make sure to understand what our clients want to accomplish, and then provide them options on how to achieve their goals efficiently and effectively. Joseph M. Corradino, AICP, President of The Corradino Group, Inc. will be the Principal-In- Charge Project Manager, and person authorized to represent the firm. Mr. Alex A. David, AICP will act as Senior Project Manager. He may be contacted at(786) 514-0121. Sincerely; The Corradino"Group, Inc. Joseph M Corradino, AICP Presiden MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services — . in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" TABLE OF CO: 'TENTS TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT 1 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 8 TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 14 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM 14 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM(ARCHITECTS&ENGINEERS) 14 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 47 TAB 3 Approach and Methodology 48 APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez(a miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: The Corradino Group, Inc. No of Years in Business: No of Years in But�ss Locally: No of Employees 41 43 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 4055 NW 97th Avenue, Suite 200 CITY: Doral STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33178 TELEPHONE NO.: 305-594-0735 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAx NO.: 305-594-0755 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 4055 NW 97th Avenue, Suite 200 CITY: Doral STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Joseph M. Corradino, AICP, President ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-594-0735 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: jmcorradino @corradino.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 61-0713040 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346 YG Appendix A— Page 1 2 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an sublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/.•6. • - -- •- -- - --- - 4 I: - - ''•- • t-..• -•• --- - -- - • - e: - --- - • • - - • • -•- • • _ !_ RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 3 • • .. . •• • • _ :•.: • 1 -•- 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractors employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health x x Sick Leave x x Family Medical Leave x x Bereavement Leave x x If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfi.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 3 4 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement-system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Rpcei t Rec�?t Receipt UM. Addendum 1 (! v Addendum 6 Addendum 11 'j Ijti^ Addendum 2 i F Addendum 7 Addendum 12 ("i'/1/' Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 i,`iv Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 t, Addendum 5 Addendum 10 _ Addendum 15 If additionarconfirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 5 DISCLOSURE,AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 6 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Re•uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Re e).pr entative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: / Joseph M. Corrad3n , AICP President Signature of Proposer's Auth• •epresen•ive: Date: 11/28/14 7I / State of FLORIDA ) On this 28 day of November ,20 1a personally appeared before me Joseph Corradir> ho County of Miami Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President ofThe Corradino Grou,Pa corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: Z-a „. ••c MY COMMISSION#EE056005 EXPIRES January 20,2015 (40?)398.0153 FbrfdaNOSQrySeyrba.oan RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 7 MIABEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements State of Florida • Department of State I cettify from the records of this office that THE CORRADINO GROUP.INC. is a Kentucky corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida qualified on January 13.1997. The document number of this corporation is F97000000207. 1 further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31.2014,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 14.2014,and its status is active. I further cettify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Gives wader say hand and the Great Seal ofthe State ofFlordda at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Foaarteeath dew ofJaaaary, 2014 • " '4.; Secretary of State Aummticutai us CC7019926369 To authenticate this certtnmte,vrstt the following site enter this ID,and then follow the tnstntdfons dtsptayeet. httpo/;tile.swabtt.wskertaattner.hurd State : f .F1crida Board of Professional Engineers • Attests that Tie.Corradino Group, is authorized under the provisioniof_.Section' 7,102.3 Florldo,Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration:2i2812015 • CA Lit.No: • Audit No: 228201503536 Certificate of Aurhoriiation 7665 8 • MIAMIBEACH _____,___ . _. _ RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services b,, — in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 1'Ziltr\ ,\ awTr.R....%Grn-'anr.ln:t .!__.A.4:nt �Grrrricen hethrnrheUl,n�. — __. __ at:IX Pbrtt.. I Julie 1 1,20i 4 Joseph M.Corrad'ero,AICP 10225 SW 58th Court PI"°`nsr,F1.3.1,S6 The American Institute of Certified Planners RE AICP CertlfIcatfon Verification To Whom It May Concern: The Prnferisio utl Irs,rlime of the American Planning Aee(n.•iln burl Please accept this letter as confirmation that Joseph ia.Corradlno,AICP took and passed the Comprehensive Planning Examination(CPE)in May 1996.He is a current member.in good slarxling.of the Amer kenlnsdtute ofCertlfNed Planners.the professiorallnsdtute hereby qualifies of the American Planning Association lAPA).McCort-ad-Imo has been a member of A1CP since July I,1996 anti his renilical ion number is 012032 Thn American Imtirule of Cenilied Manoss :AK.P) is the American Planning Jerry Hamilton Bell. Associations professional Institute,providing recognized leadership nationwide in the certification of professional planner, ethics, professional development, planning education,and the.standards of planning practice_ as a member AICP certified planners carry is high mark of distinction because they are teguired to meet rigorous standards,inalrnain their caper Ilse through continuing education.and With all the benefits MYW community unity immesh:. of a Certified Planner And For more information about the tegturemems to become an AICP member,please see re.6I11111tiibill l.v 1.0 1 he our website:narwahmsMnn nrn/atrn eUf;P(:olio of Ethics Please let us know If we can offer any additional assistance. and Professional Conduct. Sincerely. APA Customer Service Certified Planter Number:013683 American Institute of Certified Planners Ih he American Planning Association's Professional lnsttute 205 N.Michigan Ave.Suite 1240 July 1.1998 Chkago..ii.60601 AICPeeam/?s iannirrg.arg c ' / PreitDEPi - r�aa�nrr:tmttlrra Fa.,-....__ THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLANNERS ALEX A.DAVID Has qualified as a with all benefits of a Certified Planner and responsibility to the AIC?Cape of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Membership Certificate Number 015953 July 1.MOO 9 • MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" • • P g The American Institute of Certified Planners 'n..F'rnre.,k....t I of II..A.n.rienn 1'Innnintt A++.rrntinn hereby rlrullifies :Donald P. Shockey as n no mher with all the benefits I.f m Certified 1'I r and rest sihility to the AICP Coyle.of I::i.hiet and I'rofcssimltnl Com-liver. (:rrtife.l I'W.u.rr N !mi.:1017857 rel.rnar.1n.1n05 AICP CERTIFIED URBAN DESIGNER EXAMINATION OFFICIAL SCORE REPORT July 23.2014 Donald Shockey,AICP CUD Candidate ID:1 50357 Test Date:05/27/2014 Test Site:S0070 Scaled Score:60 CONCI7ATU1_ATIONSI You have passed the AICP Certified Urban Designer Examination(AICP CUD)or the American Instltmtc of Ccrtiflcd Planners(AICP), the professional institute of the American Plannin y Association. The results of the Iezt are nnl valid fn..seleelinn purpn%es Or(cdr..epinymenl ranking within the planning industry because the tests are not constructed to diffetentlate among candidates except at the passing score. 10 n •m I AM I BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services — • in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" • • LEED GREEN • ASSOCIATE . . . GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE HERBY CERTIFIES THAT • • Donald Shockey LEED GREEN ASSOCIATE '1,71,13 7%7 KNOVi ciPTF;,.RtIrD'Al 2iicr.ct o iFiPitnr uc rixff i. 0:7-JIGY ,kU1111:,..,EATING S't317.!.1' . . . 44_ cm _ ,Juty 24.2012_ _._10311292.., GBCI 11 MIA ' ' BEACH ..._ 0_ RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services ‘-',2?--- - -- in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" Tin la N4-3rtttfr DiractoryS,:o.:111 CongH,ss tr 31-hatic.vitirteril3ab JOIN CNU!KV,/tilEMIERSIIIPS-kVA/OCIMIT S. CM tilasla.,-, \i ''r ",..- •?', i j zi. col 2,,LIVIN,ICCV.27,1111T'Y I:VIATF, Pff r,Nta .,IST.00 tativer..a..3 ormnrE 4_,ADA:r Member Directory Search Edit A..tard,Criteria 0 mg..zwirj,0111.12,P111: . F,..11,.....LB ..,:irr.i-Vie. Litt 1,1r,...111,1,-..1:c.1.,0: CarOltil Iiarne 010,mit4irol, city Si igu Cmilry 1.:113.;Liffim CM1 iPtitmary) fp IIMInfi ArEICWIMIIM 8,7.6,. 6,Ars5Pri PI'.1,U t 121121 Ar.ia Parrcr Cflu,A.r.r.ireta.c in Var.,..7.ru Ortti. DOn a la ()msg., e 1 9`,7-70,-cct,gr-,,v‘it In.,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t,0.1,,,,i.E.0 nr,,,i,Grit.,a.i,,conn-tp_cp.2 40,,GIT--.-1(it zr,,,,,,,,,p.m,,,,mlos.nal uf 04U Yti,tef‘17111 crgrc p.h:rmtr gni q'?q I Seirzil_tri SO f,,,r-trIlelAiiKe.f,•2(.9ieffalli 1,:t+2.12,1t,t*.retiy-3,...cejan_t5477 if 1 12 MIAMIBEACH , ' 4 7 RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services — in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" /ZI\ \ , . 0 40) : e5 idama PQP-PCRS The Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council(UPC)hereby certifies that Donald Paul Shockek_ has attained the designation of Pearl Qualified Professional (PCRS) Date assued:309' June 2011 PQP Nu 253 By demonstrating competence in applying the Pearl Community Rating System(PCRS) �l,.,0..s,11!- :1, -1 1 :l',a,)J.-1- ABU DHABI URBAN PLANNING COUNCIL x State of Florida Board. of Professional Engineers Attests that ' Salman.Aslaml Rathore, P.E. FBP[ ,, ,,..„„--„,t, , is licensed as a Professional, engineer"under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.Lic.No Audit No 2282015087061 75281 13 MIA ( BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional. Architectural and Engineering Services -- in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 4Z6: EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS The information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in following Standard Form 330. 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Please see Section F of the SF 330 form 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Please see Section D, E and G of the SF 330 form 14 _ ARCHITECT- ENGINEER PART I—CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Architectural&Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis",Miami Beach,FL 2.PUBUC NOTICE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NO. September 19,2014 RFQ#2014-346-YG ..B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Alex A.David,AICP—Project Manager 5.NAME OF FIRM The Corradino Group,Inc. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.EMAIL ADDRESS 305-594-0735 305-594-0755 adavid @corradino.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section.for the prime contractor and all key sub-consultants.) I E (Check) 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT us N M d c vs d e o u a c X 4055 NW 97th Avenue The Corradino Group,Inc. Suite 200 Town Planning Miami, FL 33178 b. d. D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM El Attached ORGANIZATIONAL CHART __ MIAMIBEACH ► PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER Joseph M.Corradino,AICP Alex A. David, AICP ► PROJECT MANAGER SENIOR PLANNER Jerry H. Bell, AICP Donald A. Shockey, 1 AICP, LEED, GA, CNU-A TRAFFIC ENGINEER URBAN PLANNER PLANNER URBAN DESIGNER PLANNING DIVISION/ PRODUCTION MANAGER Salman Rathore, P.E. Edward Ng, MPP, MPL Amber Holloway Camilo Lopez Michelle Lopez 1;% .o . 16 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Joseph M.Corradino,AICP Principal-in-Charge a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 19 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc. Miami, FL ' _ 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A.(Community Planning)University of Cincinnati, 1992 American Institute of Certified Planner, Florida No. B.A.Villanova University(Geography), 1990 012032 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Qualifications Council Member,Village of Pinecrest, FL Board of Directors,Chamber South Chairman,American Planning Association;Gold Coast Section Executive Board(2005-2007) Chairman,Doral Business Council(2005-2007) Chairman,Planning Board,Pinecrest(2004-2006) Miami-Dade MPO,Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee,(2004-2006) Miami-Dade MPO,Development Permitting Advisory Committee,(2005-2007) Honors and Awards American Planning Association Award for Excellence:Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Study American Planning Association Award for Excellence:Clearwater"One City,One Future"Strategic Plan American Planning Association Award for Outstanding Achievement:Alton Road Traffic Calming American Planning Association Award for Outstanding Achievement: Transportation Concurrency Management Areas Honors and Awards APA Award for Outstanding Mobility Project: Palmetto Bay Transportation Master Plan Florida Redevelopment Association Award:Hialeah Transportation Concurrency Management Areas Mr.Corradino is president of The Corradino Group and heads the company's planning operations in South Florida.In addition to administrative responsibilities,Mr.Corradino works with local and state governments developing policy and strategic planning efforts,including public involvement,charrettes and workshops;transportation,traffic and transit studies;as well as comprehensive plans and mobility studies.Mr.Corradino is a skilled transportation/land use planner,and has more than a decade of experience in the field. His specialty is working with municipalities,in transportation master plans,urban design studies,traffic calming,traffic impact analysis,transit planning,comprehensive planning and growth managementiconcurrency.He has won six awards from the American Planning Association. He has served as the Chairman of the Village of Pinecrest Planning Board.He also serves on the Miami-Dade County MPO, Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee,(CTAC),the Development Permitting Advisory Committee,(DPAC),and is the Chairman of the Gold Coast Chapter of the American Planning Association and has directed the development of Transportation Master/Mobility Plans for municipalities such as Miami Beach,Doral,Miami Gardens,and Palmetto Bay. 17 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay,General Planning Services PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Cutler Bay,FL(Miami-Dade) 2005-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Shortly after incorporation in 2005,the Town hired Corradino to serve as its initial planning director and planning staff. The firm helped the burgeoning town handle the onslaught of development applications and reviews for its first year or so, until permanent staff could be hired. Once a Planning Director and planners were on board, Corradino served as the general consultant assisting with transportation, planning and civil engineering projects. Corradino has reviewed development applications, produced the Town's Comprehensive Plan,written the Town's Land Development Regulations, provided cost estimates and scopes of services for major roadway reconstruction and paving, produced the Transportation Master Plan,written grants, a done individual traffic calming analysis, including road closure recommendations,assisted with the development of Green policies and code regulations,evaluated economic development initiatives along US-1, structured aspects of the Capital Improvements Element,evaluated environmental characteristics of the community,acted as a liaison between the Town and Miami Dade County Public Works, FDOT and the MPO, held public involvement meetings,conducted the US-1 Charrette, as well as developed civil engineering and drainage plans. The firm is available at a moment's notice to assist in any way needed. Corradino serves as the Planning Staff. Cutler Bay is newly incorporated and faces a myriad of issues relative to taking over the planning and zoning tasks from Miami-Dade County, as well as developing a planning department. In doing this job,the firm reviews planning and zoning applications, has re-written land development regulations for an Urban Center District, meets with applicants,develops staff reports, and provided a profession planning staff recommendation at various public meetings. (Total Fees to Date: $1,469,556) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,City of CONSTRUCTION(if Homestead,FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) 2010-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Provide professional planning services on an ongoing basis.Work tasks include: Preparing and processing Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments; Reviewing and processing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Amendments submitted from the public; Preparing periodic studies and reports on technical planning and zoning issues; Preparing graphics and maps related to planning and zoning issues as needed; Coordinating and facilitating neighborhood informational workshops on all appropriate b. applications, such as Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezones; Reviewing land use applications submitted to the City; prepare and submit a complete staff report of the appropriate recommendation to the Local Planning Agency and Council; Reviewing Building Permits for conformance with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan;Advising the City on issues related to the State requirements, specifically related to the requirements which have been placed on local governments with the passage of SB 360(Florida's most recent Growth Management Legislation); Maximizing citizen input utilizing charrette and planning workshops when appropriate;Assisting the City with services related to annexation pursuant to the requirements of Section 20- 3(a)-(f)of the Miami-Dade County Code;Advising the City on creating a concurrency management system; Concurrency Reviews of Development Proposals; and Traffic Impact Analysis. (Total Fees to Date: $634,000) 18 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED ° Village of Palmetto Bay,General Planning Services CONSTRUCTION(if Palmetto Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) 2008-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm S Principal in Charge: Provide general urban planning,traffic engineering and general NE services including but not limited to:comprehensive planning, land development regulation,charrettes, neighborhood plans, and code enforcement regulations;traffic counts and reports;traffic planning and surveys; and comprehensive traffic analysis, safety analysis, parking studies,traffic intrusion studies,and neighborhood traffic management; building renovations and/or alterations;facility design,and specifications; space planning;cost estimating; construction inspection/construction management; landscape design; and park facility master planning. (Total Fees to Date:$58,537) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade County MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami, CONSTRUCTION(If FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) 2009 d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge: Performed planning projects as directed by MPO staff. Projects included public involvement, transportation analysis, high level presentations and consensus building. (Total Fees to Date: $503,880) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR C OMPLETED City of Doral General Planning and Engineering Services, CONSTRUCTION(if Doral,FL(Miami-Dade County) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) 2004-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge: Corradino has developed the City's first transportation master plan, reviewed developments a moving through the public hearing process, reviewed applicants traffic impact analysis, planned, implemented and managed one of the most successful municipal circulator systems,and provided in house staff to assist in day to day planning and engineering functions including general traffic engineering services to include, but not limited to,traffic counts,field observations, roadway capacity/level-of-service(LOS)analyses,traffic surveys, road safety analyses, parking and site plan studies/reviews, review of traffic impact analyses of proposed land developments,etc. (Total Fees to Date:$470,580) 19 E:"RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT . • (Complete one Section E for each key person.) . 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 2 Alex A.David,AICP Senior Project Manager 29 (Sub-consulting with firm since 2005) 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group, Inc.—Fort Lauderdale I Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) MBA, Barry University, 1987 \ American Institute of Certified Planners, No.015953 BS Geography(Urban Planning), Pennsylvania State University, American Planning Association,No. 116051 1982 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations Former Vice-Chair City of Miami Beach Design Review Board Former Chair Miami-Dade Planners Technical Committee Board of Directors,Gold Coast Section,American Planning Association Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Member, Miami-Dade County MPO Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee Professional Awards/Special Commendations DCA for Hialeah Gardens EAR South Florida Regional Planning Council for Aventura and South Miami EAR processes Treasure Coast RPC for the Villa.e of Ro al Palm Beach EAR 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS - -_.-- - -- ------ --- (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach Development Review and PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Concurrency Management,North Miami Beach,FL(Miami-Dade SERVICES applicable) County) 2010-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑C heck if project performed with current fir Project Manager: Review and analyze development applications received by the City in order to evaluate and address impacts to key facilities and services, including transportation, parks, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and schools. (Rate: $125.00/hour) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Illustrative Concept Plan for Downtown, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) North Miami,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2014 NIA c. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm As Project Manager for The Corradino Group, Mr. David was selected to lead this seven month effort to develop the Illustrative Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown.This focused on generating ideas for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown District(C-3), as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan.This Plan conceptualized new land use patterns, public and private redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, landscape/streetscape enhancements to guide public and private investment.Additionally, urban, landscape, and streetscape design concepts were identified. A variety of graphics including collage renderings, plan,aerial views,and street-level perspectives were prepared to depict concepts.The Concept Plan and graphics provide a visualization of the key elements and recommendations of the Master Plan and will serve as a guide for the long-term coordination of private and 20 public investment.As the ultimate goal,the City envisions the downtown area to be a lively,safe and comfortable area for new and existing residents, businesses and visitors alike. (Project Cost: $43,500) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Parking Inventory and Needs Study,North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if j Miami, FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current ay firm As Senior Project Manager for The Corradino Group, Mr. David was selected to lead this two month effort to develop the Parking Inventory and Needs Study for the Downtown District.This focused on providing strategic locations for parking garages and mixed use parking structures in order to support the future needs of the anticipated development, redevelopment and civic improvements within the boundaries of the Downtown District (C-3). (Project Cost: $15,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Concept Plan for Downtown and Business PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Action Plan,Opa-Locka,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Senior Project Manager for the Corradino Group, Mr. David is preparing the Concept Plan showing new land use patterns, redevelopment opportunities, urban design elements, and landscape/streetscape enhancements in the d. CRA district.The document will show options for increasing the height and massing of buildings in the downtown area and CRA districts,as allowed in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Key urban design and architectural styles will be illustrated, including options for wider sidewalks,outdoor dining areas,courtyards, potential parking areas and shade trees. The last Phase of the project is to assist the City in developing a Business Action Plan in order to implement strategies to attract new high quality businesses into the downtown Opa-Locka area. Investigate incentives and strategies, particularly in areas that have been successful and are similar to the City of Opa-Locka. (Project Cost: $25,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Sunny Isles Beach General Planning Services,Miami PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Beach,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2007-Present NIA (1), (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Since 2007, Mr. David has been providing on-call planning and zoning review services including: public hearings, Comprehensive Plan amendments,expert witness services,traffic impact analyses,development review,water supply planning and,temporary planning staff on an as needed basis. (Rate: $125.00/hour) 21 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jerry H.Bell,AICP Project Manager a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 14 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.A. (Urban and Regional Planning),University of Florida, 1992 American Institute of Certified Planners,No.013685 B.A. (Geography),University of Florida, 1989 American Planning Association,No.092548 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations University of Florida Urban and Regional Planning Department Advisory Council,2009-Present Gold Coast Section Florida APA,Board Member and Education Officer 2009-Present Chair,Miami-Dade Planners Technical Committee,Green Initiatives Subcommittee Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association Professional Awards/Special Commendations Speaker and Panelist on a number of events at a number of events and conferences, including the 2005 APA Florida Conference, 2014 National APA Conference, 2014 APA Florida Conference, July 2009 South Florida Regional Planning EAR Training Workshop,and August 2009 Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council EAR Training Workshop 19. RELEVANT PRO J ECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Hialeah Gardens EAR and Amendments,Hialeah Gardens,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2011-2012 NIA 2004-2005 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with • current firm Project Manager: Prepared the City of Hialeah Gardens 2004 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.The City's EAR was adopted on schedule, and was found sufficient by the Department of Community Affairs.The City was recognized as the first municipality in the State to successfully complete the EAR issue scoping process. In 2011-12, prepared the"3rd Round"EAR for the City. (Project Cost:$20,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Key West EAR Amendments and Building Permit PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Allocation System,Key West,FL(Monroe County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager: Managed the amendment and update of City of Key West's Comprehensive Plan,the first major update since its adoption. Major focus areas include transportation management, hurricane evacuation, development and redevelopment,and affordable housing.The Transportation Element was updated with current data and analysis and to reflect current conditions,and transportation levels of service were analyzed and updated.The amended plan was adopted on schedule and found sufficient by the State. Mr. Bell also worked with the City to update its Building Permit Allocation System for the period of 2013-2023.The purpose of this update was to manage the allocation of building permits in a manner that maintains hurricane evacuation clearance times and furthers the achievement of Comprehensive Plan goals,objectives and policies. (Project Cost:$145,800) 22 , (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach Development Review and PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Concurrency Management,North Miami Beach,FL(Miami-Dade SERVICES applicable) County) 2010-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager: Review and analyze development applications received by the City in order to evaluate and address impacts to key facilities and services, including transportation, parks, potable water,sanitary sewer, solid waste,and schools. Review traffic studies submitted with development applications, and provide feedback and analysis. (Rate: $125,00/hour) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED City of Hialeah Gardens Block Grant Consultant, Hialeah PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(If Gardens,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2000-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager: Serves as the City of Hialeah Gardens'CDBG/HOME Program Consultant,which entails the preparation of funding applications,ongoing coordination with Miami-Dade County's Office of Public Housing and Community Development, project management,and reporting requirements. BDPG is currently managing the rehabilitation of low income homeownership units at Samari Lakes East Condominiums on behalf of the City under a$2,257,000 Home grant. (Rate: $125.00/hour) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Growth Management Plan,Cutler Bay,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2007-2008 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm eb Project Manager: Prepared the First Growth Management Plan(Comprehensive Plan)for the Town. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted on-time and found sufficient by the State. The Team was commended for the quality and organization of the Comprehensive Plan,which is being recommended as a model. (Project Cost: $250.000) 23 • E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) . 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Donald Shockey,AICP-CUD,LEED GA, a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM CNU-A Senior Planner 18 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group, Inc.—Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPUNE) M.A.in Public Administration,University of Florida, 1981 Certified Planner and Urban Designer,American Institute B.A.in Political Science,University of Florida, 1980 of Certified Planners 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Trainin:,Awards,etc.) Professional Affiliations American Planning Association,2002-present American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP)certification,2005-present Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)Green Associate certification,2009-present Congress for New Urbanism(CNU)-Associate certification, 2013-present Estidama Pearl Qualified Professional- Community Rating System, 2011 -present Vice Mayor, Miami Shores Village Council,Miami Shores Florida,April 2009-April 2010 Miami Shores Village Planning and Zoning Board,October 2002-2004 Miami-Dade Communit Image Adviso Board 2009-2010 • 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Fort Lauderdale EAR and EAR Based Amendment Data PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Inventory and Analysis,Fort Lauderdale, FL(Broward County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:Assess major issues affecting the City, Preparation and adoption of Evaluation and Appraisal, Data, and Analysis Reports to include Transportation, Coastal Management,Conservation, Intergovernmental Coordination, Capital Improvement, Parks and Recreation, Historic Preservation, and Climate Change Element Data and Anal sis. Project Cost: $131,200 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Hallandale Beach Citywide Master Plan,Hallandale PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Beach, FL(Broward County) SERVICES a• licable) 2008-2009 NIA b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Senior Planner/Project Manager: Led a team of planners, urban designers, landscape architects,economic . development analysts,and graphic specialists in developing a transformative plan to recast a sprawling oceanfront automobile-centric city of 40,000 residents into a walkable,sustainable and more liveable community with a hierarch of cit ,district,and neis hborhood centers. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Tampa Riverwalk Master Plan,Tampa,FL(Hillsborough PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2005-2009 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Senior Planner/Project Manager: Led a team of planners, urban designers, landscape architects, interpretive and wa incline specialists,cit branding consultants,economic development anal sts,civil engineers, biologists,and 24 graphic design specialists in converting a neglected 2.4 mile long urban waterfront into iconic urban amenity that will reconnect a city of 2.8 million people with its scenic waterfront and act as a catalyst for extensive new downtown development.The Tampa Riverwalk will link neighbourhoods,civic and cultural facilities, parks, hotels,and residential developments and serve as a multi-purpose public space featuring public art, interpretive elements,and engaging design features. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Infrastructure and Base Master Planning,Kandahar Air Field, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Afghanistan SERVICES applicable) 2010-2012 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm d. Senior Planner: Managed the work of 5 to 10 urban/community planners working to develop numerous master plans for shared international and Afghan security installations throughout Afghanistan. Analyzed existing transportation, infrastructure, housing,community,security,and airfield installation elements and capacities and planned short and long range development of each element. Managed complex development projects through all phases of the process: needs identification, programming, • design,funding,and execution by private construction contractors. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Capital Improvement Projects,Miami Beach, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) FL(Miami-Dade County) 2000-2005 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm c° Senior Capital Projects Planner: Performed a wide range of senior level analytical, planning,and management tasks related to the identification,design, and construction of capital improvement projects undertaken through a $400 million dollar CIP program encompassing park, recreation, public facility,streetscape, stormwater,and water improvement projects. The successful CIP program is widely acknowledged as having attracted hundreds of millions of dollars of private sector commercial and residential development and cementing Miami Beach's role as a global visitor destination. Managed all aspects of capital project planning,funding, and design. 25 • E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person.) . 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Salman Rathore,P.E. Traffic Engineer a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 10 I 2 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group,Inc.—Miami,FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIAUZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPUNE) BS(Civil Engineering),National University of Science&Technology, Professional Engineer,Florida, PE No.75281 Risalpur, 1995 MS(Transportation Engineering&Planning),Michigan State University, 1999 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUAUFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Rathore has over 10 years of experience as a planner and traffic engineer and has participated in multiple projects in a variety of fields of discipline.His experience includes traffic impact studies,developments of regional impacts,traffic operations studies, signal/stop warrant analysis,development of traffic signal designs and intersection improvement plans. He is proficient in the use of HCS,S nchro,TGEN and other traffic operations analysis software. 19. R ELEVANT PR OJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay 97th Avenue Street Closure Feasibility Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Cutler Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Performed traffic operations analysis for the intersections and roadway links in the immediate • vicinity of the 97th Avenue in the Town.The analysis was based on the assumption of closing 97th avenue and redirecting traffic through alternative routes. Speed data was also collected and the 85th percentile speed was compared against the posted speed limits to determine if the vehicular traffic will have any negative impacts on the pedestrian safety of the surrounding streets.(Project Cost:$10,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Village of Bal Harbour Traffic Study,Bal Harbour, FL(Miami- PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with b. current firm Traffic Engineer: Conducted traffic operations and pedestrian safety analysis for a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed development located at 10200 Collins Avenue within the Village of Bal Harbour, Florida.The proposed development plan consisted of a 260-unit luxury condominium building, 2,500 square feet of a sit-down restaurant and 4,500 square feet of spa facility on the east side of S.R.A1A/Collins Avenue between Harbour Way East and Harbour Way West in the Village. (Project Cost:$21,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Review of Traffic Impact Study,Miami PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Beach,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2012-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash analysis, collision diagrams and capacity analysis. (Rate:$110.00/hour) 26 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Review of Traffic Impact Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Cutler Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2012-Present NIA • (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash analysis,collision diagrams and capacity analysis. (Rate:$110.00/hour) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Village of Palmetto Bay Review of Traffic Impact Study PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(If SERVICES applicable) Palmetto Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2012-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Traffic Engineer: Responsible for reviewing traffic engineering studies, intersection safety analysis,crash analysis,collision diagrams and capacity analysis. (Rate: $110.00/hour) 27 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT • - (Complete one Section E for each,key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Edward Ng,MPP,MPL Urban Planner(Town Planning) a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 7 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) � The CorradinoGroup,-Inc.-Miami,FL' � T 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Public Policy,University of Southern California,Los Angeles,CA 2012 American Planning Association Master of Planning-(Concentration in Economic Development),University of Southern (Affiliation) California,Los Angeles,CA 2012 BA(Planning and Public Policy, in Economics),Rutgers University,New Brunswick, ( 9 Y ) 9 NJ,2008 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Graduate Certificates (USC),2012 Management Public Mana Homeland Security and Public Policy(USC),2012 Real Estate Development, Rutgers University,NJ,2011 Housing and Community Development,Rutgers University,NJ,2008 Honors And Awards Editor-in-Chief,Plan On!Trojans Urban Planning and Policy Blog,04/10-05/11 Professional Development Chair,SPPD Asian Pacific Islander Caucus,04/10-05/11 President,Rutgers College Alumni Class of 2008,05/08-05/13 Chair,University Affairs, Rutgers University Student Assembly,04/07-04/08 Outstanding Graduate Student Leader Award,04/12 SPPD Academic Capstone Achievement Award,05/11 Robert Biller Award for Best Performance in the MPP Practicum,05/11 LGBT Service Award,USC,04/11 Deoartmental His Honors,Edward J.Bloustein School of Plannins and Public Polic ,Rutgers;Dean's List,Si.06-S..08 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm a Planner: Evaluates existing ordinances and assists in ordinance revisions as needed. Provides staff reports on impact analyses of proposed changes. Ordinance revision and/or review work included Billboard and Paint ordinances. Provides GIS support as needed by client. Performs QA/QC of maps,database updates,and provided ArcGIS technical advice to client. Reviewed site plans and over 100 zoning change ordinances adopted by the City of Homestead between 1993 and 2014 in order to incorporate all zoning changes into an updated and current Zoning map. Reviewed and updated Future Land Use map. (Rate: $80.00/hour) I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka.Land Development Code Revisions,Opa- PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Locka,FL(Miami-Dade County) 4-Pres applicable) SERVIC NIA 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I ® Check if project performed with 28 I current firm Planner: This project involved revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations. Assisted in the writing of the Land Development Code for the City of Opa-locka, a project provided for partially from a HUD grant. In charge of writing the Redevelopment Element and providing support work for the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; provides support work in research and revision of all elements of the LDC to ensure compliance with state regulations regarding mandatory sections and information; provision of all GIS maps for the LDC; assists Opa-Locka in the revision of its Ordinances as requested. Recent ordinance revisions include the Signs Ordinance, Peddlers/Street Vending Ordinance, and the Mixed-Use Overlay District Zoning Ordinance. (Project Cost:$60,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Transit Mobility Plan,Doral,FL(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2013-Present NIA • (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner: This study is evaluating current transportation in Doral to assist the city in improving mobility, and will include an assessment of existing projects and future needs, development of projects, and an implementation plan. Work currently involves transportation systems analysis, including review of demographics and trends, the goals and policies of the Doral's Comprehensive Plan, and traffic count and data analyses, and involves field assessment of the urban design and connectivity of the multimodal transit system, as well as public outreach. Currently, this has led to the development of a current and future project needs list to improve multimodal transportation in Doral. Work also includes the utilization of ArcMap and ArcCatalog to conduct geospatial data analysis of existing and needed transit infrastructure improvements and to provide graphical display of mapped project data. This project will also address the spatial requirements of elements necessary for effective, safe and secure multi-modal transportation solutions integrated into normal roadway operations. (Project Cost: $70,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Transportation Master Plan,Cutler Bay,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(If (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2013-2014 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm d. Planner: This project involved an update to the 2008 Transportation Master Plan. Evaluated current traffic counts and created 5 and 20 year projections from Level of Service Analysis. Updated and analyzed existing TIP projects and evaluated policy, land use, demographics, transit, and economic trends as part of analysis. As part of overall analysis, constructed a project list with 63 projects, worth appx. $21 million, and prioritized this list's individual projects into a recommended 5-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Utilized GIS to conduct geospatial data analysis of existing and needed transit infrastructure improvements and to provide graphical display of mapped project data. (Project Cost$70,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County): (2)YEAR COMPLETED Planning and Business Development Consultant;Strategic PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Plan,Downey Art Vibe,Downey,CA SERVICES applicable) 2012-2013 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Planner: Developed and wrote the 3-5 year business operations and strategic plan leading to the creation of a new Public-Private Partnership between the Downey Art Vibe,a non-profit for the arts,and the city of Downey, as a means to aid the redevelopment of Downtown Downey via introduction of arts and culture. Researched and pursued grant for arts education programming and public art gallery development, leading to procurement of a grant funding 2 years rental costs of the gallery's physical location. Provided additional support to organization via staff training,operations, public meetings with City officials, and community outreach/stakeholder development. 29 . RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 1.3. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Amber Holloway Planner a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 1 >1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradiino Group, Inc.-Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIAUZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS(City and Regional Planning),Ohio State University,2013 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Computer Skills ArcGIS Adobe CC Suite Microsoft Office Suite 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Transportation Plan Update,Cutler PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Bay,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable)• 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant for a Transportation Master Plan Update,Amber completed multiple field studies. She has been actively involved in several Public Participation Workshops.Amber has completed trip analysis studies where she analyzed the bus routes and completed cost/benefit studies. In addition to her analysis,she also wrote the Complete Streets section of the Master Plan. (Rate:$72.12/hour) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway is a planner with experience in Comprehensive Planning.As a Planning Consultant for The City of Homestead,Amber handles zoning inquiries, inclusive of research and response through a formal letter. She provides the public with current and proposed zoning legislation. She administers the Public and Administrative Hearing Process and is responsible for taking in all development applications, distributing to Planners and Department heads, keeping both the applicant and planners on schedule for the Hearings and produce meeting minutes. She is currently acting as the Clerk to the Planning&Zoning Board, Historic Preservation Board, Development Review Committee and the Art in Public Places Committee. She produces visual aids through GIS mapping for project specific locations. She actively assists in the Site Plan Review Process.Amber has participated in amending land development regulations with respect to setback standards and commercial development regulations.Amber conducted research and drafted a Construction Values report which will be utilized by the local Chamber of Commerce. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,Homestead,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway wrote the update report for the Community Rating System, Fiscal Year 2014. This report requires collaboration between the Building Department and Planning Department to provide 30 necessary information to the citizens of Homestead regarding flooding. By providing detailed information about flooding and prevention,and annually completing the report,the City of Homestead is enables its citizens to obtain lower Flood Insurance rates. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,Homestead,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present • (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planning Consultant: Ms. Holloway completed the background research for three Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Homestead Downtown CRA. She collected zoning and land use information for properties as well as completed the ArcGIS mapping for the projects. (Project Cost: more than$60.6 million) (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services,Homestead, FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Historic Preservation Officer: Ms. Holloway is the acting Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Homestead. This position entails the review and approval of applications for Certificates of Appropriateness and clerking all Historic Preservation Board meetings. Ms. Holloway is also responsible for the writing and presentation of the staff reports for Certificate of Appropriateness applications to the Board and Development Services Staff. 31 • E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED.FOR THIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person.) _ • 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM Camilo Lopez Urban Designer 3 2 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) The Corradino Group, Inc.—Miami, FL 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPUNE) M.A.in Urban and Planning,Florida Atlantic,2014-Present B.A.in Architecture,Florida Atlantic University;-2014 B.A.in Urban Design,Florida Atlantic University,2014 A.A.in Architecture,Broward College,2011 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUAUFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) "Downtown Phenomenology"research case study 1st Prize-School of Urban and Regional Planning,2014 All School Innovative Design Charette Competition Award Honorable Mention-School of Architecture,2013 State Rd 7/441 Comprehensive Master Plan-Best Performance Award-South Regional Planning Council, 2013 LEED Certified Neighborhood Assessment-Visconti Neighborhood Plan Best Performance,2012 9 9 National Concrete Masonry Competition-1st Prize Award-School of Architecture, 2012 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Concept Plan for Downtown and Businees PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Action Plan,Opa-Locka,FL(Miami-Dade County) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Urban Planner:This project is evaluating current social,economical and ecological conditions of Downtown Opa-Locka and generates a vision based on community,city, and private input. Provides community ` development support to Opa-Locka City Center CRA Plan by implementing design concept guidelines to improve the city's vision and provide comprehensive streetscape improvements, land use allotment, mobility systems,architectural features,and economic development mechanism through design. In 2030,the City will be a successful and financially stable full-service community that offers ample economic opportunities to residents, boasts a vibrant and distinctive Downtown and healthy neighborhoods,and provides excellent services and a great quality of life to residents, businesses and visitors. (Project Cost:$25,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Opa-Locka Land Development Regulations,Opa-Locka,FL PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if (Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Urban Planner:This project involves an update to the existing zoning configuration of the City of Opa-Locak. Provides design guidelines to support The City of Opa-Locka Land Development Regulations Renewal Plan by implementing graphical depictions to improve readability of the building form, setbacks, building heights, right-of- way, landscape,density levels, land uses,overhangs, parking and provide comprehensive visualization of zoning requirements. (Project Cost:$60,000) 32 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Transit Mobility Plan,Doral,FL(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:This study is evaluating current transportation in Doral to assist the City in improving mobility, and will include an assessment of existing projects and future needs,development of projects, and an implementation plan. Provides graphical support to Doral Transit Mobility Plan by implementing proposed mobility upgrades on map sheets to improve the city's comprehension of future needs, project cost charts,trolley routes,express bus lanes,shared-off road paths,crosswalk stripping, bus shelter installations, pedestrian islands,ADA compliance, bicycle signalization programs, bicycle rest areas, mid-block crossing and other road features with an implementation plan. (Project Cost: $70,000) . (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Downtown North Miami Parking Study-North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Miami,FL(Miami-Dade County) SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm • Planner:This study is evaluating current parking supply in Downtown North Miami to assist the city in improving d' long range parking capacity infrastructure, including an assessment of existing conditions and future needs, development of projects, priorities,estimated cost,supply and demand forecast,and an implementation plan. This Parking Study has been prepared, based on and as a supplemental report to the Illustrative Concept Plan • for Downtown,the Downtown Development and Major Corridor Master Plan,the Comprehensive Plan and allowances for development in the Downtown under the City's existing Land Development Regulations. (Project Cost: $15,000) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Downtown North Miami Concept Plan-North PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) Miami,Florida(Miami-Dade County) 2014-Present NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Planner:This report evaluated the physical and sociological conditions in Downtown North Miami to assist the city in improving long range visions, and included an assessment of existing conditions and future needs, 03 development of projects, priorities,estimated cost, key civic spaces,streetscape improvements, street furniture enhancements, land use composition, higher density forecast, lively community concept, mixed-use activities and provide a comprehensive visualization of based on a participatory input. The Concept Plan for Key Elements of the Downtown focused on generating ideas for strategic locations of redevelopment and civic improvement within the boundaries of the Downtown District(C-3),as recommended by the City's Downtown Master Plan. (Project Cost:$43,500) 33 E: RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE Michelle M.Lopez Planning Division Manager a.TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM 10 <1 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(Ci and State) The Corradino Group,.Inc.—Miami,FL_ • - 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.A. Public Administration,(Minor in Political Science and Certificate Real Estate Sales Associate,Florida, No.SL3143948, in Public Policy),Florida International University,2011 2005-Present MBA(Business Administration),Florida International University,2014 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Registration Real Estate Sales Associate, Florida, No. SL3143948, 2005-Present Professional Affiliations American Planning Association 19. RELEVANT P ROJECTS _ (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Planning Division Manager,The Corradino Group,Inc.,Miami,FL. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE IN Check if project performed with current firm Manages the general business operations of the Planning Division including marketing, business development, staff utilization, monthly business planning, work-in-process management, financial reporting and analysis, and the overall growth of the Division. Works with Staff to ensure quality client service and efficiency is consistent and maintained. Collaborates closely with production, marketing, human resources, senior management and ' executive management. Works with multidiscipline staff of professionals to identify and pursue business prospects, coordinating proposals and supporting materials for new business opportunities. Provides technical support to staff and clients, as it relates to land development regulations, comprehensive planning, code interpretations, and business management. Manages client deliverables and Division profitability, conducts QA/QC of working drafts, and distributes work to qualified staff and appropriate personnel. Responsibilities include writing proposals, interviewing, contract negotiations, project work planning, coordinating with other Division Managers and Project Managers, supervision of executed work, and ensuring quality and timeliness of deliverables. Also serves as Division Manager for Production Division, ensuring companywide deliverables are produced in a timely manner, in accordance with client's needs and expectations. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead Zoning Administrator,Homestead FL.(Miami-Dade PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if County SERVICES applicable) 2014-Present N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Reviewed applications for entitlement, enforcing the City's land development code and comprehensive plan, and evaluated projects for community impact and feasibility. Met with applicants, land use attorneys, and developers, and provided City Code and Comprehensive Plan information and interpretations. Reviewed applications for site plan, variances, special exception permits, land use and zoning changes; prepared staff reports and made recommendations to the Development Review Committee (DRC), Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. Represented Department during quasi-judicial and legislative hearings. Reviewed building permit applications for 34 compliance with zoning, landscaping, and sign codes, comprehensive plan, and adopted ordinances and - resolutions. Made recommendations for updating the land development code and comprehensive plan. Conducted administrative oversight of Development Services Department Staff of eight. Managed contracts for Building Department and Planning Department, Department budget and expenditures, and Capital Improvement • Projects(CIP). (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Development lConstructionlEstimating Consultant,BCM Construction PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Management,Miami,FL. SERVICES applicable) 2010-2011 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Reviewed scopes of work and construction documents for bid. Coordinated project teams for bid response. Developed job estimates for commercial, municipal, and county clients, requests for bid, request for proposal, and request for qualification through the use of historical data, take-off analysis, and subcontractor bid . comparisons. Coordinated project teams and maintained competitive bidding practices for negotiating subcontractor proposals. Drafted, issued, and executed contacts, scopes of work, and project schedules. { Reviewed awards and contracts for scope of services, scheduling, costs, and legal sufficiency. Maintained database of subcontractor contact information, license and insurance, and resumes, including project history and qualifications. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(County) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Director of Planning&Construction,10 Minute Manicure,Miami,FL. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if SERVICES applicable) 200.7.2009 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Evaluated and recommended site locations for retail and service expansion throughout the US and Canada. Exclusively managed the planning, design, value engineering, and construction of retail, street, mall, and airport locations from conceptual through occupancy. Implemented real estate, planning, development, construction, and facilities operations practices for franchisee program. Selected, negotiated, and managed contracts for design team, contractors, and fixture vendors. Responsible for the design and development of space plans; the preparation of department and multi-store location construction budgets, schedules, and cost estimates; and the coordination and securing of design and plan approvals, permits, and inspections with airports, landlords, and regulatory agencies. Competitively bid, selected, and negotiated contractors for site construction. Purchased fixtures, furnishings, and equipment component selections, ensuring the company brand image was maintained d. corporate wide. Achieved a twenty percent reduction of production costs through value engineering. Served as • on-site project manager, supervising construction, installations, and inspections. Reviewed and approved invoices, tracked change orders, and negotiated pricing. Managed facilities, including existing store life cycles, maintenance, retrofits, and remodels. Developed and maintained knowledge of landlord-tenant and regulatory requirements for design, construction and maintenance of facilities. Worked in conjunction with marketing team to execute graphics program, including logo, signage, and exterior and interior graphics treatments. Domestic projects developed in: Miami International Airport, South Terminal; John F. Kennedy International Airport, American Airlines Terminal 8, and Delta Airlines Terminal 3; Dulles International Airport, Concourse D; '. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Terminals B & C; Blue Grass Airport; South Florida International Airport; Downtown Miami, Miami, FL; Mall of America, Bloomington, MN (Clear Smile Kiosk). International projects developed in Pearson International Airport, Toronto, ON Canada, Piers 1 & 3; Ottawa MacDonald-Cartier International Airport,Ottawa, ON Canada,and West Edmonton Mall, Edmonton,AB Canada. 35 Project Coordinator l Assistant Project Manager,The Green PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION(if Companies,Miami,FL. SERVICES applicable) 200.5-2007 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Analyzed and managed regulatory affairs and reporting for Development and Construction Departments. Secured land entitlements and development permits for construction in conjunction with environmental impact reports, traffic studies and development plans for proposed projects. Coordinated and co-managed competitive bidding, purchasing, and contracts for tenant improvements. Researched land development regulations, comprehensive plans, and Florida Building code,and coordinated project activities with government regulatory or other governmental agencies. Served as Project Administrator for Private-Public Partnership joint developments between Developer and Miami-Dade County, owner's representative during regulatory proceedings, and point of contact for design professionals and sub-contractors. Assisted in contract negotiations for development agreements, construction contracts, joint ventures, and other investments. Liaised between Owner, Contractor(s), Design Professionals, and the County, Municipalities, and Cities, and served as Owners Representative during Miami-Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals proceedings. Projects included high- ; rise, mixed-use,office, retail,and apartment buildings such as: Development and Construction, Government Affairs, Regulatory Compliance: Towers of Dadeland I and Dadeland Centre II Design, Government Affairs, &Pre-construction:Towers of Dadeland II Tenant Improvements & Regulatory Compliance: Dadeland Centre I, The Greenery Mall, Dadeland Square Office Park, Dadeland, West Office Park, Westland Executive Office Park, and Dadeland Vista Apartments Affordable Housing:Chelsea Commons Apartments and Green Vista Apartments 36 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT . ' 1 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,`if not specified. ' li � Y P 1 4 Y� . � p 1 p Complete one S ect ion F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead General Planning Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Homestead, FL 2007-Present NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Homestead Mr.George D.Gretsas,City Manager 305.224.4500 E-mail: '•retsas Ci ofhomestead.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) In 2014, Corradino was tasked with completing Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map amendments, the rezoning of City- owned properties in Downtown Homestead and, amending the zoning code to allow for certain public and retail/entertainment facilities. Additionally, The Corradino Group, Inc. (Corradino) has worked for the City of Homestead since the mid 1990's having completed several planning and engineering studies in and around the City including a city-wide gateway signage project, the Transportation Element to the Comprehensive Plan and the design of the Campbell Drive/Florida's Turnpike interchange. In 2007, the firm was hired to its current General Planning Services Contract. In this contract Corradino serves in several capacities. Joseph M. Corradino,AICP is has served since 2011, as the City's Development Services Director. In this position he oversees the Business Licensing Division, the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Division. This Department has a combined budget of nearly $2 million. This year it issued nearly 5,000 permits, and over 13,000 inspections, generating nearly $4 million in revenue. The Department renews nearly 2,500 business licenses and processes nearly 80 public or administrative hearings annually. Corradino's staff works seamlessly with City staff and management to assure that this very important department is able to continually move development forward in efficient and effective manner, as long as applicants are adhering to the City's code. To supplement the municipal staff, Corradino provides its planners to review public hearing applications as part of the City's cost recovery process. In this capacity Corradino's Planners, including Alex David, Jerry Bell and Salman Rathore review all manners of applications including site plans, variances, certificates of use, special exceptions, planned unit developments and traffic impact analyses. In addition Corradino handles special projects that have included annexation analyses, zoning code chapter revisions, a public art master plan, comprehensive plan amendments, zoning and land use map changes. By hiring Corradino, with nearly 150 professionals, any need that the City has may be serviced, avoiding unnecessary in-house staff redundancy, and resulting in marked efficiency and effectiveness in developing projects. In an era where it is important for cities to maintain the status quo with municipal budgets, the use of The Corradino Group, Inc. enables the City to continue to provide a high level of service. Project Cost: Varies with Task Orders • 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT _ (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group,Inc. Miami, FL Service Planning and General Planning, Trans.ortation and Traffic En•ineerin 37 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS:WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the'agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. • Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Land Development Regulations and Transportation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Planning. 2009-2011 N/A Cutler Ba ,FL 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Town of Cutler Bay Rafael G.Casals,Town Manager 305.234.4262 Email:rcasals' cutlerba -fl.,ov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group provides General Planning Services to the Town of Cutler Bay. Immediately after incorporation the firm served as interim planning director, until the position was permanently filled. The firm continues to serve as staff for a myriad of is sues Corradino completed the Town's first land Development Regulations. Other tasks include, plans review, zoning, land use, traffic impact review, GIS,and transportation planning and engineering.This General Planning Services Agreement enables the Town to be flexible. By hiring Corradino,with 150 professionals,any need that the Town had may be serviced, avoiding unnecessary in-house staff redundancy, and resulting in marked efficiency and effectiveness in developing projects. Services provided: Urban Planning, Plan Review, Permitting, Traffic Impact Analysis,Comprehensive Planning,Transportation and Transit Planning. Project Cost:$500,000 • 25.-FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS-PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group,Inc. Miami,FL Planning and Zoning Services, Trans•ortation Plannin• Services 38 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE.PROPOSED TEAM'S !I 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as•many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified... Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Sunny Isles Beach EAR—Based Amendments and General Planning PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Services 2007-Present N/A Sunn Isles Beach,FL 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Sunny Isles Beach Claudia Hasbun,Community 305.792.1757 Develo•ment E-mail:chasbun • sibfl.net 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) In 2007 the EAR-Based Amendments were completed for the City. The Amendments were adopted on schedule and forward sufficient by the State. Additionally the firm has provided planning and zoning review services including: public hearings, Comprehensive Plan amendments, expert witness services, traffic impact analyses, development review, water supply planning and, temporary planning staff on an as needed basis. • Project Cost: >$200,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Grou Inc. Miami, FL Project Mana•er/Plannin• Services 39 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S • 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER • QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 • • (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. • Complete one Section F fore_each project.) j 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Key West EAR Amendments and Building Permit Allocation System Key PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) West,FL 2012.2013 N/A • T — — 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION • a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Key West Nicole Malo,Planner II 305.809.3720 Plannin• and Zonin' De•artment Email: nmalo ke estci .com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Managed the amendment and update of City of Key West's Comprehensive Plan, the first major update since its adoption. Major focus areas included transportation management, hurricane evacuation, development and redevelopment, and affordable housing. The Transportation Element was updated with current data and analysis and to reflect current conditions, and transportation levels of service were analyzed and updated. The amended plan was adopted on schedule and found sufficient by the State. The Corradino Group is currently working with the City to update its Building Permit Allocation System for the period of 2013-2023.The purpose of this update is to manage the allocation of building permits in a manner that maintains hurricane evacuation clearance time and furthers the achievement of Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies. • Project Cost: $145,800 2 5.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Grou Inc. Miami, FL General Plannin• Services 40 • F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH.BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S • 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or.10 projects,'if not specified.' . • Complete one Section F for each project.) • 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Village of Palmetto Bay General Engineering and Planning Contract PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Villa.e of Palmetto Ba , FL 2002-Present NIA --- - - -- -- -- — - •- '� 23:PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION—---�------ - -- - - , - - - ---- --`- - . a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Village of Palmetto Bay Mr.Ron E.Williams,Village Manager 305.259.1234 E-mail: rwilliams• •almettoba -fl..ov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group, Inc. (Corradino) has been providing general planning and engineering services to the Village of Palmetto Bay since their incorporation. These services include traffic engineering, traffic counts, field observations, traffic calming studies, roadway capacity/level-of-service analyses, traffic surveys, road safety analyses, parking and site plan studies/reviews, review of traffic impact analyses of proposed land developments, etc. Corradino has completed a Village-wide Traffic Calming study as well as studies to determine the feasibility of a traffic circle and other physical traffic calming devices. The firm is integral in approving, designing and managing the construction of a number circles, chicanes, and other traffic calming devices. Corradino provides general planning services including review of development app licatio n s particularly related to use and traffic impact analysis. Corradino also performs master planning, including the award winning transportation master plan, bicycle and pedestrian master plan, and safe routes to school studies. Each of these studies won awards from the America Planning Association, and have become major components of the Villages Capital Improvements Program. Corradino developed the Village circulator system, which is gaining ridership each year. The firm is assisting with the planning for the redevelopment of the Franjo Triangle area. Project Cost: Varies 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Grou Inc. Miami, FL General En•ineerin and Plannin 41 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 6 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency;or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) _ 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City Coral Gables EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2008-2010 NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION_ • a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Coral Gables Eric Riel Jr.,Former Planning Director 305.579.6675 E-mail: riel • miamidda.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Corradino Group was contracted with the City to prepare the Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendments. Following the transmittal and a finding of sufficiency for the Evaluation and Appraisal Report by DCA, the EAR-Based amendments required to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan addresses all State requirements was updated and prepared. The Team prepared the documents necessary for the City to authorize and approve transmittal of the amendments to the Florida Department of Community Affairs(DCA). The EAR-based amendments were adopted within 18 months after the EAR is adopted and found sufficient, in accordance with State law. Project Cost: $25,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH TH IS PROJECT _ _ (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. The Corradino Group, Inc. Miami, FL Planning; EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments 42 • G.KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS USTED IN SECTION F (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) (Fill in°Example Projects Key°section below before completing table. Place"X"under project key number for participation in Town Planning same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Joseph M.Corradino, Principal-in-Charge X X X X X AICP Alex A. David,AICP Project Manager X X X X X Jerry H. Bell,AICP Project Manager X X X X X Donald P. Shockey, AICP Senior Planner X CUD, LEED-GA,CNU-A Salman Rathore, P.E. Transportation Planning X X X Edward N Transportation Planning Services and X g GIS Amber Holloway Associate Planner X Camilo Lopez GIS and Graphics Michelle Lopez Staff and Production Management X T r 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE AND EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE AND EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 Homestead General Planning Services 6 Coral Gables EAR Amendments 2 _ Cutler Bay LDRs and Transportation 7 3 Sunny Isles Beach General Planning Services 8 4 Key West EAR Amendments and BPAS 9 5 Palmetto Bay Engineering and Planning 10 43 • . H:-ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . ' . 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. ' y', CORRAOINO WINS TCi4f,L;AWARD- TThe Conedino Group nos awarded the TEAMFI Chairmen's Award.TEAMK is the Tronsoonation and 'Erpress•a,Authority membership of Florida.(basically FDOT,the Expresso,Authorities and the 'Prim*sector).The Chairman's Award goes to the most innovate a and creative harnportatian project in the State of florido.The Carrodino Group's presentation on the 1.95 Express lanes Project ors chosen as the mess inne.atwe praise that addresses transportation need while providing emiremen• , tat benefits. . Corradino is on the cutting edge of inns ati.e aunsoo Cation solutions for rt4eeing traffic congestion S !!in heavily urbanised communities such as South Florida.Inne.oti.e solutions Eke this require a colab- • aeon.,Team effort for.which Corradino is eU knoh.n.The strums of this pitied required the coordi- .. - j nation and pmtieipWmn of USOOT(HMWAL FOOT,the FFanda leg'rsIature and local ge.emnoms.To r. turd this oro�ect Corradine assisted FOOT in pppf,nq for and abraes ng o S 62.9 million fedarol groM ,-., hem USDOT's Ur bon Pertnsrshia Ayeemsnt NPAI•and o S 35 million slate legiskati.e approprio• , _ _ _ `t . ��] lion . i ? In addition to assisting with the dembp- _ ) s' men,end implementation of the overall • , . strategy.Conodino performed all tanning ' ,]]-�'4 .,7 '•.. engineetzmp,modeling,intercotert coati- .C O RR D; N O netiort,tad public iol.emsrrt necessary to comply with the UPA reawrements. v i • Subsequent to the UPA application,Cot. r; ratline completed a Pro*,Oe.etpnent - and Erwirorunsnt (PDUE) Study, and k f ,�-'• 'y� � obtained location and Design 'h:- •r'�-•, 14/. R.•Concept Aaepfonce MOCA) in lout _ """��, :'r, . 111...ohs .Ten the process typically i _ n 4 �' .;. 1 1 `—';1£1'+►. requires eighteen(18)to twenty-four(2e) - --"17Oi dad ..N the Ernzment(PCir)Shtd,. . and obro:nsd toccten and Design . Conceal Aaeptonce (MCA) in tout (41 months when tsm process typicUy requires eighteen(181 to threnty•four(241 progesses •�'', t? Dehg.nAuild po se.Coaodino the s ,'�M. ''l •: 1cont'uweng to praaide Public rol emeiM ,,, l Sernces for this high.Mafile project. I_ 1 lei" Mike C.f..;NM and Mike Circa.(high l of C.a.oa ' Evidence of our reliability and dependability to manage the budget and quality of our work "Joe,I wanted to say thank you from the bottom of my heart for the laud work that Hare,Juanita,Guy,Mark V, and you did to make Last week's DRIC Relocation Meetings were an incredible success.i am so proud of your team. You shine no meaner how difficult the challenge is!I have heard many I'IDOTe►s say the nicest thing about your awesome team!Heart felt from MDOT to our extended team at Corradino is Mohammed" —Note from the Project Manager to Joe Corradino related to the Detroit International Crossing project, a federal mega project "I want to say that i thought this was an excellent,excellent job,and I commend you,Jeff,and all the people that were involved...this is an excellent document...I think this will be very,very helpful in achieving that balance...an excellent job...tlhrough the balancing things out through chapter by chapter... impressed by how little serious discontent there was...vast majority—Really good document... With regard to the school...I think your recommendations there are excellent... With regard to economic development,again I think you did a wonderful job on balancing out the different issues that are here..." —Transcript of Commissioner Cooney's Public Comments,Kalamazoo Comprehensive Plan "Yes, because of their sincere and transparent approach to involving a variety of points of view...This approach, couple with a commitment to creative problem solving, comes from the top, and continues throughout the organization." —Ann Arbor Planning Manager Wendy Rampson,when asked "Why would you hire Corradino again?" I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . The foregoing is statement of facts. . • 31.SIGNATURE A .- / 32.DATE • 11/28/14 33.NAME AND TITLE y 1 Joseph M.Corradino,AICP-President 44 SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-,ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS • RFQ#2014-346-YG PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FRIM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABILISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER The Corradino Group,Inc. 1970 04-665-6815 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 4055 NW 97th Avenue,Suite 200 a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Miami FL 33178 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Joseph M.Corradino,President 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.594.0735 jmcorradino @corradino.com 8a.FORMER NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE 9. EMPLYOYEES FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.FUNCTION c.N0. OF EMPLOYEES a.FUNCTION c.REVENUE INDEX NUMBER(See CODE b.DISCIPLINE (1) (2)BRANCH CODE b.EXPERIENCE below) FIRM 02 Administrative 30 15 B02 Bridges 1 06 Architect 1 C15 Construction Management 6 08 CADD Technician 3 3 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost 1 Engineering and Analysis; Parametric Costing;Forecasting 12 Civil Engineer 27 5 E02 Educational Facilities; Classrooms 14 Computer 2 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies; 6 Programmer Assessments or Statements 15 Construction 35 25 El0 Environmental and Natural 1 Inspector Resource Mapping 16 Construction 1 Ell Environmental Planning 2 Manager 21 Electrical Engineer 1 E13 Environmental Testing and 2 Analysis 23 Environmental G06 Graphic Design 1 Engineer 24 Environmental 2 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield 5 Scientist Paving;Parking Lots 29 Geographic 106 Irrigation;Drainage 1 Information 3 1 System Specialist 30 Geologist P05 Planning(Community,Regional, 4 Areawide and State) 38 Land Surveyor 1 P06 Planning(Site,Installation,& 3 Project) 47 Planner: 12 8 R03 Railroad;Rapid Transit 2 Urban/Regional 48 Project Manager 13 6 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment 3 and Disposal 58 Technician/Analyst 510 Surveying;Platting;Mapping; 2 Flood Plain Studies 60 Transportation 10 2 T02 Testing and Inspection Services 1 Engineer T03 Traffic and Transportation 3 Engineering T06 Tunnels and Subways 1 Total 141 67 4p 1 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert Revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work n/a 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 4. 500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 10 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE: / 32.DATE 11/28/14 33.NAME AND TITLE `}} Joseph M.Corrachino,AICP-President 46 M RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services --` ' in Specialized.Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 1/ZIPtAl� 2.3 Fin.ncial Capacity From:Bullington,Larry[maifto:Bullingtonl@dnb.comj Sent:Thursday,October 30,2014 10:44AM To:Alexis Mattey;yusbelgonzalez@miamibeachfl.Rov Cc:Bullington,Larry Subject:RE:Assistance Needed-SOR to be sent to the City of Miami Beach,Attn:Yusbel Gonzalez Yusbel here is Supplier Qualifier Report for CORRADINO GROUP,INC,THE. Larry Bullington Relatier h.ip Manager Dun&Bradstrsek S&L Government Solutions 2590 Hickory Bluff Lane,Jacksonville, Fl 32273 T:904-262--9518,300-999-3867 ext.6098 F:866-690-3204 M:904-403-9741 bullingtonlednb.com Questions or feedback?1.800.424.2495 Be sure to check out the new www.dnb.com/gov • 47 MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 4� in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 7/1&,\N-, TOWN PLANNING APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Corradino has extensive successful experience with the Town Planning services being sought through this City of Miami Beach RFQ as well as the "as-needed" method by which the services will be provided. The firm typically works for local municipalities as their general engineering or planning services provider. Specific tasks are then completed in response to the evolving needs of the client as they arise. Under this contractual arrangement, Corradino has provided municipal clients with a wide spectrum of Town Planning services including comprehensive planning, evaluation and appraisal reports, land development regulations, development review and water supply planning. The firm's Town Planning assignments have typically included an initial research and site visit stage followed with a comprehensive planning or design analysis, recommendations and presentations, and a completed plan or design. On each of these projects Corradino has been responsible for developing a scope of services and project methodology, collecting and analyzing the data, identifying constraints, opportunities, and options, and then fully developing a consensus option. Projects have always required developing sophisticated graphic supporting materials to enable the public, staff, and decision makers to understand and visualize the results and recommendations. Most projects have also entailed developing materials and conducting public meetings or workshops to obtain necessary public input. The Corradino approach to providing the Town Planning services requested through this RFQ will consist of being prepared, responsive, effective and efficient. Corradino is accustomed to working on task order based contracts with large and undefined scopes of services and has the personnel, knowledge and resources to successfully complete each work assignment issued by the City of Miami Beach The Project Team as led by Mr. Joseph M. Corradino, AICP is prepared to respond to the City's Town Planning task requests on an immediate basis. Upon receiving a task request from the City, Mr. Corradino along with Alex A. David, AICP, Senior Project Manager, will develop a scope of services, deliverables, timeline and price for completing the task request. A Task Team will be developed for each task request and will consist of staff members with the strongest experience in the subject area of the task request. Detailed information on the Task Team will be provided to the City Project Manager who will be continuously informed on the status of all assigned work. Work will begin upon receipt of a written notice to proceed, and will be completed on-time and within budget. Corradino recommends regular meetings with the City Project Manager throughout the course of the project to ensure clear communication on project expectations and deliverables. The Corradino Group 48 MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services - in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" ZZ%?\ Each task request will have a Senior and a Technical Project Manager assigned to them as the Point of Contact (POC) who will handle the day to day operations of the assignment. These Project Managers will work closely with City Project Manager to ensure the assignment is being handled in the most efficient, accurate and responsive manner. The Technical Project Manager, working with the relevant input from the Task Team, will collect all data, assign and manage all analysis work, develop conclusions and recommendations, and prepare reports and presentations as specified in each deliverable. The Technical Project Managers will work closely with Mr. David to ensure that excellent quality control is maintained on all aspects of the project. Detailed Approach to City's Requirements Staff provided by Corradino are proactive, self-starting, well-educated and ambitious professionals who thrive working independently or as part of a team. Each has been vetted through a process matching their experiences, personalities and capabilities with the firm's and clients' needs. Both public and private sector planning responsibilities present unique challenges and the ability to handle those challenges effectively will create a highly responsive and professional planning and zoning department. Town Planning Town Planning services are understood to include the preparation of comprehensive planning, evaluation and appraisal reports, land development regulations, development review, water supply planning, code development, climate change mitigation and adaption, monitoring changes in County and State laws, updating land use and zoning maps and capital projects planning as distinguished from more specialized plans. Corradino has excelled at providing these Town Planning services as seen in the experience of our staff and our similar work for other cities. Corradino and our staff also bring to the table the state of the art thinking and practices in sustainability, walkability, urban forms, and liveability that inform the best Town Planning projects in the industry. Corradino is also very experienced at navigating all of the steps of completing these kinds of Town Planning projects which typically involve identifying the task, conducting extensive research and in person site analysis, developing and illustrating design concepts and plan elements, presenting concepts to the public, City staff, boards and officials, and obtaining official approval of the completed plans or projects. The firm's depth at its technical positions means that it possess the technical ability to handle any planning issue. As will be seen from the resumes provide the firm is adept at: The Corradino Group 49 etIMIA ( BEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services — in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" 7Z/EtNL • Comprehensive Plans • Comprehensive Plan Elements and Amendments • Public Hearings Processing • Zoning Reviews • Site Plan Reviews • Variances • Certificates of Use • Zoning Code Writing and Amendments • Zoning Verification Letters • Civil and Site Engineering • Traffic Review and Impact Analysis • Parking • Government Relations o Coordination with SFRPC, MPO, FDOT, RER, MDCPW, MDC Fire We invite you to call the references submitted below and inquire about our work ethic and performance. We commit to providing our services on-time and within budget. Why Corradino? Corradino has completed extensive work on similar Planning and Urban Design tasks for multiple cities and agencies in South Florida. A partial description of relevant project experience is provided below as well as in the additional Project Sheets included for your review: Miami Beach Corradino has completed General Planning Contracts providing a variety of services which have included: • The Miami Beach Mobility Plan • Miami Beach City Wide Parking Study • The Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan • Development of the Electrowave (South Beach Circulator) the Intermodal Center Implementation Study • The Bay Link Alternatives Analysis • The Automated Concurrency Management System • Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan Presentations to the Transportation and Parking Committee, Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council The Corradino Group 50 MIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" ;1 Miami Corradino has produced numerous streetscape and corridor planning projects for the City all of which included Planning and Urban Design elements. Corradino worked on the master planning for the Flagler Street Corridor, the Performing Arts Center, and the master planning for the Mary Brickell Village area. Cutler Bay Corradino developed the City's trolley circulator and provides the review of development applications particularly related to traffic impact analysis. Services provided also include master planning, including an award winning transportation master plan, bicycle and pedestrian master plan. The firm has assisted in the design and construction management of various streetscape and drainage projects and developed the City's first comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Corradino performed an interactive charrette process for an existing land's use and urban design along the US-1 corridor between Florida's Turnpike and 184th St. After, a review of previous plans, an interview with stakeholders was held. A one-day workshop was initiated where multiple design issues were addressed by the citizens, staff and elected officials. Subsequently the consultant team developed a multi-area plan, architectural rendering and implementation strategies. A highly graphic charrette document was then produced. As a newly incorporated town with a new comprehensive plan, the Town of Cutler Bay required its own unique land development code to implement the goals of the comprehensive plan and to establish development standards that are appropriate to its supporting the Town's vision for the future. Corradino developed LDR's that meet the unique needs, concerns, and interests of the Cutler Bay community. The process included: • Kickoff and scoping • Evaluation of existing LDR • Interviews with town staff • Initial, revised and final drafting • Staff and public review/input • Public meeting, hearing, and adoption process • Final adopted LDR • Staff and public training • Post adoption support The Corradino Group 51 MIAMIBEACH RFQ #2014-346-YG: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services — in Specialized Categories on an "As- Needed Basis" e, � �L�� Homestead Corradino is currently providing Development Services Director and staff services and managing a staff of over a dozen planners, engineers and inspectors. This work includes ensuring compliance with all development regulations many of which have urban design elements as well as developing the Downtown Master Plan. Corradino is also working to implement the City's Art in Public Places ordinance, managing the Public Art Committee, developing the Public Art Master Plan and administering to the Public Art Fund. North Miami Beach Services provided included review and analysis of development applications received by the City in order to evaluate and address impacts to key facilities and services, including transportation, parks, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and schools. Palmetto Bay Corradino provides review of development applications particularly related to traffic impact analysis. Corradino also performs master planning, including an award winning transportation master plan, bicycle and pedestrian master plan, and safe routes to school studies. Corradino developed the City's circulator system. Additionally the firm has performed traffic calming analysis. The firm is integral in approving, designing and managing the construction of a number circles, chicanes and other traffic calming devices. Hialeah Corradino has provided every level of engineering and planning services required for dozens of drainage, streetscape and traffic calming projects, roadway corridor construction management efforts including development application reviews, planning design and the construction management of several parks and recreation facilities. Additional services provided have included the development of the city's transit system, concurrency management system and transportation concurrency management areas. Key West Corradino has recently completed the update of the City's Comprehensive Plan, performed numerous drainage and infrastructure projects, and assisted staff in updating the City's Building Permit Allocation System. The Corradino Group 52 • • . • FDOT Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 605 Suwannee Street ANANTH PRASAD,P.E. GOVERNOR Tallahassee,FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY February 7, 2014 MR. JOSEPH CORRADINO,PRESIDENT THE CORRADINO GROUP 4055 NW 97TH AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33178 Dear Mr. Corradino: I want to thank you personally for your conscientious efforts during the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year to use Disadvantaged Business Enterprises(DBEs) on Department of Transportation funded projects. The State of Florida achieved 11.78%exceeding the 8.60% DBE goal established for the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year. Your company was instrumental in the achievement of the state's goal. The actual percentage reported for your company is 28.05% on 13 project(s). This results in a DBE utilization grade of A+. Your efforts are commendable and show a commitment to being a supportive partner in our efforts to ensure minority and female owned firms have the opportunity to obtain work on transportation projects in Florida. I encourage you to continue with these efforts that not only strengthen the overall economy of the State,but also strengthen the transportation industry. If the Department can provide you with any assistance in the DBE Program,please contact Art Wright,Manager Equal Opportunity Office at(850)414-4749 or arthur.wright @dot.state.fl.us. Also,you can visit the EOO website at www:dot.state.fl.us/equalopportunityoffice/to view the 2012-2013 federal fiscal year grading scale and reporting criterion. Thank you again. Si rely, Ova.* Alf Ananth Prasad,P.E. Secretary AP:aw • 53 www.dot.state.fl.us