Loading...
Agreement with Zyscovich, Inc.f . . Qo - a9 ac)if ----o29'o AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ZYSCOVICH, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE: PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 AND 2015-29068 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ZYSCOVICH, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 15 day of December, 2015, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and ZYSCOVICH, INC, a FLORIDA corporation having its principal office at 100 N. Biscayne Blvd., 27th Floor, Miami, FL 33132 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015 and July 8, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015-29041 and 2015-29068, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with ZYSCOVICH, INC. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in 4 writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in 5 compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. 6 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual 7 agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable 8 Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. 10 Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative , P p working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and 11 consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies,), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with'such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under 12 this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. 13 The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to 14 verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by 15 the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. • 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final 17 updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written 18 approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions.. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this , Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE • All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: ZYSCOVICH, INC. 100 N. Biscayne Blvd., 27th Floor Miami, FL. 33132 Attn: Bernard Zyscovich, FAIA Tel: (305) 372.5222 Fax: (305) 372-5222 Email: bernard @zyscovich.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes•Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of 26 Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 27 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. A,' r Attest CITY OF MIAy r/ 21 12- rip 441h CIT CLERK � . Q *4 MAYA / Attest ' Z I 416 * 0/ Add Signature/Se. eta , *1 IhiroRp ORATED; g gnatu a/PrAident MARIO SUAR �\ /, s BERNARD ZYSCOVICH Print Name A,a . ,�;•,, A . '\� Print Name , .• .. ���h , FOR q;:ttf, ■ Pie 4," - t • 8c FOR t 28 ) r� otOelf,Cn ( k-15 ;„ . . City Attorney ( f Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ZYSCOVICH, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: ZYSCOVICH, INC. 100 N. Biscayne Blvd, 27th Floor Miami, FL. 33132 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector (CEI) $103.50 Inspector (CEI, Field or $ 94 88 Construction) 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT: • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. 32 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29068 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., - ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., URS CORPORATION, E-SCIENCES, INC., CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC., THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC., BRINDLEY PIETERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND BCC ENGINEERING, FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED. TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one(51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; and WHEREAS, this resolution only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., third highest ranked, Zyscovich, Inc., fourth highest ranked; The Corradino Group, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1- Environmental Engineering was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; URS Corporation, second highest ranked; E-Sciences, Inc., third highest ranked, CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; GFA International, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., are tied as the sixth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., eighth highest ranked, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 2 - Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture was as follows: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., top ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 4 - Structural Engineering was as follows: Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., top ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., second highest ranked; Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., third highest ranked; Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., fifth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., sixth highest ranked, and HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the seventh highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code, which states that in the award of contracts the following, shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract; and WHEREAS, after careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, for the discipline of Structural Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2' day of ,J/,/ 2015. ATTEST: / // ' ,�-./ R-fael Granado Cit �:-'. \ Bp ha; ilip fvin-. ∎!ay.rr / T:IAGENDA120151JuIy1PR000RE W2F14 •'.-YG •0——. sidnal Arvitectural and Engineering Services-Reso(Plan,Urban Design,Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).do INCORP ORATED? P4 I%QH 2 . APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE • &FOR EXECUTION caostoxv.( City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Via Resolution 2015-29041 passed and adopted June 10, 2015, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the disciplines of Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines: Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. After reviewing the submission, the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received and the City Code, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended fo r eac h discipline as noted beginning on page 5 o f t h e attached ac h d m m randum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account • Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: D: s artment Director Assistant City Manager City s er Al EC DM V MT JL T:IAGEN' +0151July1PROCUREMENT\2014. 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Sum - (Plan, Urban Design, Env Eng, t Design,Structural Eng).docx AGENDA ITEM C MIAMIBEACH DATE 7-8`IS MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, .miamibeachf.gov C MMISSIO /MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of he City Comm sion FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager Alt%_r DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for' professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. Commission Memorandum Accepting the.Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach For Group 1 — Planning and Urban Design Architecture, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional . . Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (PLANNING&URBAN Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE DESIGN) Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 95 1 93 1 3 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 82 2 88 2 87 3 7 2 BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 79 5 78 3 88 2 10 3 ZYSCOVICH,INC. 80 4 78 3 85 4 11 4 THE CORRADINO GROUP,INC. 82 2 75 5 81 5 12 5 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 4 For Group 1 — Environmental Engineering, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (ENVIRONMENTAL Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE . ENGINEERING)-. Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking • TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 99 2 94 1 4 1 URS CORPORATION 93 2 100 1 88 4 7 2 E-SCIENCES,INC. 89 4 80 4 89 2 10 3 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 92 3 88 3 87 5 11 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND • ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 5 79 6 89 2 . 13 5 GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 6 80 4 76 8 18 6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 82 6 79 6 83 6 18 6 CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. 61 8 57 8 80 7 23 8 For Group 2 — Interior Design and Space Planning,.the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (INTERIOR DESIGN 8 Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE_ SPACE PLANNING) Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 92 1 92 1 88 1 3 1 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS,INC. 78 2 73 2 70 2 6 2 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 5 For Group 4—Structural Engineering, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering LOW Services Oniel Jose A. Sabrina AGGREGATE (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Bagheri Ranking TOTALS Rank DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 94 1 94 4 6 1 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 100 1 91 3 96 2 6 1 THORNTON TOMASETTI,INC. 97 3 90 4 97 1 8 3 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 95 4 92 2 93 5 11 4 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 90 5 89 5 95 3 13 5 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 70 6 86 6 77 7 19 6 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 60 7 80 7 78 6 20 7 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5)firms be awarded in each category. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code which states that in the award of contracts the following shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. After careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 6 In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the g y a g y recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. JLM/MT DM/ EC/AD/YG T:IAGENDA120151July 1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Plan,Urban Design, Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).docx RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender& Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg & Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; negotiate an agreement with any of the further, should the Administration be unable to g g y recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /0 day of 71J72O1 s. ATTEST: Alet f( //// t Rafael E.—ranado, City I :```N"‘11""1441 Philip Le V- 17; :or' \ B 1\4 ••ti T:\AGENDA12015\June\PROCUR-/ENT12014 ;�. � a yofesgiona 4 hit-•C=I'and Engineering Services-Reso.docx INCORP ORATED: 1-1 2o,..'S APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION LP3 -,5 City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan,etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: 'apartment Director Assi. + Manager City M,.l;ager- AD ;./ ECM DM MT IV I JLM T:WGEND 9015\June1PROCUREMEN12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa •• x • i�� AGENDA!�• M C?S MIAMI 1 BEACH QA-re 6-10-(S- MIAMI BI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members he City Co / ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10,2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Barmello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE KR,1242447?5.r. Architectural. >^ngimaer g Service Ism {tANPSf ,PE Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE =/ eAttECTUREf Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 • 4 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 7 3 CRAVEN,THOMPSON& ?s. ASSOCIATES,INC. ! 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 4 MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES.INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 70 6 69 4 70 6 16 6 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE RFQ#2014,346-?lam0, Professtnaorctokti*arrd.. LOW Ehgi� 2 " Deborah Rogelio Valeria y AGGREGATE tGERAlE.SAR� Tackett Ranking Madan _ Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE& INTERIOR DESIGN,INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 8 1 , GLAVOVIC STUDIO.INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 ;r>,; 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES, : INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 x:4- 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES.INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS,INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 17 7 WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS,P.A. 87 4 78 9 75 10 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS,INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 34 11 CPH,INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 35 12 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 57 12 70 12 55 14 38 13 CIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 70 12 ,_ 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE tY RFQ#,Z.o14- YG u. ,Afchlte'ctaralarld Low_ :;�>ngineeringSer ices,<?° Deborah Rogelio Valeria ' , AGGREGATE _� (TOWN PLANNING),'. Tackett Ranking , Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking ':b : TOTALS Rank ZYSCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 r;; 3 1 THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 2 76 2 83 2 6 2 1 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE 3 ` `V' Pof ae ► W ;-si � Ya Ergp i9s LQNL _ s . �4 '' Deborah Rogelio Valeria ,t AGGREGATE > :_p a rtwoll�_^ Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Melia Ranking :Z=,.) TOTALS Rank R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ; ' ARCHITECTS,P.A. 100 1 99 1 I 90 1 :- 3 1 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ,-; ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 90 1 , 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 96 2 91 3 75 4 ',:? 9 3 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS.P.A. 83 4 84 4 i 80 3 ''i'' 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING RFQ }i Y G Pca l e r o L 1- , ° Arai gineerjetg�` ` '-'..'''.1."1';'- & . '. Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE Y:r:. r, :,._(CIVIL ENGINEERING) ,„;,: • Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking TOTALS Rank WADE TRIM,INC. 95 2 97 1 81 8 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES. 'a INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 ''41 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. } I 83 10 90 6 96 1 � , 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 . I 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, INC. 96 1 95 3 62 24 r. 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY.INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 F; i 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 94 3 87 11 70 18 "o 32 9 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 A- 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 _ 13 86 12 74 11 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 6. ; 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, .,, INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 ,, 39 15 • CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE.INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 . . 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 —1 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 ,• 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 `:'' 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 66 21 ., 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING.INC. 68 25 77 19 60 26 - 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 _ 26 73 23 61 25 _ 74 26 LAND SURVEYING Y,. r.RFQ #2014-346•YG !:.'Profeesiona4 ARCiii,durst and": Lati_ * t , !``v Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE (LANQ YIG} ���.•:.,., Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking OTALS. Rank SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 96 1 80 2 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND . ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 4 84 6 69 5 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 ' 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING,INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& 1 INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 , 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES, I INC. 77 8 75 9 60 9 26 9 1 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 For Group 4, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for P P � P p Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING Professional Arch tactural acid Eng seer;irig Services LOW I (MECFtAN[CAL,ELECTRICAL-, Oniel Jose A Sabrina AGGREGATE PMHBVG ! Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS ; Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 t 7 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD Consulting Engineers 73 3 87 _ 2 85 3 F1 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. 9 9 9 June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc.,for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:\AGENDA\2015\June\PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE,TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS the Committees convened to consider the ro osals as follows: the P P Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:W GENDA 120151June1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION City Attorney Date 155 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 156 1 - ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 M I AM I EAC H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office `til then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 &6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question #71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 / 2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications': In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 1 Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro.._ g �/ � ...� f I 7 Denis Procurement Director F MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeechfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2. 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach.City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B— Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement" from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION. The following clause has been added to Appendix D—Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents,.plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS:. Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. Q2: Section Cl. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? • A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete A/E teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown. at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term, we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category.. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its y is options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together (one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 it group for which they seek qualifications, Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A '; Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group: a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning.. Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for. GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The. City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future.. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting, we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example:. Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. All: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To. evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (With its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section Cl. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, • and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an • architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page • 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- • house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that.we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? • A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of • mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 1.3 of the. RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted" 020: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A& B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings,.etc. 024: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staffs accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed. Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes.. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving, an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December. 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda... Q29: Will a.State issued DBE certification suffice as "verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications PP 9Y� p include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section 0.1, Minim_ um Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section 0.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab .2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2"d underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1st underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 1.2 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm" The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer'in each firm /team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report.(SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: P lanning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not.a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals, in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, `It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select AlE Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full NE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may- award more than one Proposer per specialized category. P g rY Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both re- ro osal meetings or will they P P 9 Y be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or "Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400 —Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section. 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida. Department of Business. Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 Q49: We will be. submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300 _Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum.. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. 052: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a — it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staffs diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question #24 in this Addendum. 053: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to "term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your `user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The "user name" is the same as the "email address": yusbelgonzalezRmiamibeachfl.gov Q55:. Appendix.C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. 056: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS& ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO &ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN.INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN &ASSOCIATES BENDER&ASSOCIATES.ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG- J BERMELLO, AJAMIL&PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI & PARTNERS, INC. RED DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD&ASSOCIATES ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP, INC. CALVIN, GIORDANO &ASSOCIATES ` SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN &ASSOC INC • CES CONSULTANTS, INC. SH.ULMAN.&ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED I THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC • EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP { TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA, INC. WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC.. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three 9 P 9 ry separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason, we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. 062: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. 064: In regard.to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural& Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 1.2 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum:of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than.5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to Within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. • Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? • A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 12 • • • Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Sub mittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the.response. Q71: Under Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format- TAB 2 - Experience & Qualifications, we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I - Sections, A-C; and sections F - Example Projects; G - Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II —General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections D-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. P P A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2..1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under "specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design / Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A — Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled ''Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written. for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A& B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for. each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category (minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix `C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3.. of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez , 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission.. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos- -in ere .'- l x l'enis Procurement Director 14 •f • • PRE PROPOSAL ME,EETINO SIGN IN SHEET OCTOBER 1 , 2014 • • 't i 15 { M !AMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October I, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME CONLPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 Nu , c= sbelonzalez; miamibeachfl.,ov ext. 6230 `F AUL S. M A.sTRA?A 4?-.0s5 -t' Z AF,C1 E t 1 SDI 5 is-0-73 a "kgstrapci.e vo55b4\f cow, rrlartn .Cam i1 . 37x2, pcgOo 37 {;,v'C C o6 v c j r Ali (LoAr■ eaav\ SC .7)uleiLS0Nc\. \t ,eO 'l art. C\C',j .7) IC1 .CC3 f74-6-77 e.\\)s ros.C.ce.; (;)- Stcki*P „C'_ED'OA G .t� - 7.-^" P 3e.S. G-71. 305. G-73 . M,A#'" -�'� ^�,k... ra P4 KID M44JZ Y/Ab 2- f ATee uri eefrn,4 n// -mac`• - 6i&-77 - 77 ,;.g Avie2.4 rdearaza hehar- ci Dr44 VTAiipri 6o.chirrz.cmpt. 3br ' tom 0444 614 o IO C- ti � -�1 3n-Z.51.34. r:`d.coa.r-ci -D ri-aaK' faC4 CAp c.rt,(3-hoi C<&ipitlad4 • Cc i MIAAAIBEACH CI' A'. OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (pLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS "Ale/ e/Z' 3.057.g6 pz;tweefe:5 ; 7:52.44-02,,14/ 1\i6103\ Cc:0Q Su C. 1-\ U M C, (elTh 3a1-436 c: 249-o jrKcio @iftrova._c_ (41i , +1 2 11- MEL)Sc; M mPAE-'-fitz-et- .14 -270S-1DO -gcio° 1,1 Std.1-A—u-L7■. 5(.4 61, St 1 62n c5 fe- e AI , s-" 5iti-7 .561 sql .or01) an,w04. lytolvlan 0 GA1 t•: 4.0 rY1 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CN B 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 � � 0 vu.isbelizonzalez,rmiamibeachfl.cfov� ext. _� .J� CS'/ C Nr2,AL pe5)44/-54,51 (6os)44/-s49 J V///are 6-5. j r e . e 7 3 6 2 (-3os);(4.- jaf3171d=t(fric077 jczSO4 D (Ad: --r y 0 )-e(-7-)64-04,74* - 3 0 4ean 1 ( 7 \k,LAN s *- (� \1e-keptIk e C h,t,,-Ci/e •gori1 32-(o (1/44 IcA Vacc' ) Qi & P FeN 't*ice_C't rk5 U/ 7 3 r ?o Cu es 01■rtSIAC-0,4. Kat*%..T,L) isIN),110.... 0--LN e •3it, Ce.c,(\La. V 1 l� '�4- �i �51� ono (�' k+{ 3L6-- - A Laa.c_ _p k3, cc can 3 L./17,0 //Si r;,3.A MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME - PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CNIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelCczonzalez ce;miamibeachfl.22ov ext. 6230 61/1i 66-4, i✓rIgi rl.e-e r i 09 5cs -3 -c 7O-�3 c.�in 0 bus- GaAu;��efbc.Geig,cirri cifek,e, P Jv (.1( rQ i2e474,,, -60 i ,/,)4 11 '4I Q rC't0 S -1 ( o9 'H11) OA k)e +y • tr-re' (3:7. r C .?S3 3oar BauA ecC6la\ Sti ' j oT anal 1,365 a i• lc\1 04. a vteitensti -- rtA____ t` '°" `^ec = Y `'`x,233 - , < v - 24 q• -F-v>LL-A -0./0r-1w Art. 4 NCB- '!r /L '� '1 •rr.. c:-1---cif„. / -r/ A•& 2-0 trt r i EAcc-E FL F c 16) /v\ JAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BRACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME • (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS PHONE# FAX# -WO S As Der LsN Ofors 3os- tmpeir(a) 1 Low) tir-ir& .42 Ay_ — 1PC• , ref_lar:KWal riv., • • ti MIAMIBEACH Kj..rtf. �. I1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PR iT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelg.onzalez iamibeachfl.u.ov° ext. 6230 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305) 441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305) 670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305) 446-7799 [leana Gonzalez Robayna& Associates (305) 823-9316 • Natalie Lockwood, Andrews &Newman (305) 444-6454 Tom Decker Wollberg Alvarez &Partners 305) 666-5474 Victor Herrera NV5 (954) 495-21 12 Douglass Man CB&I 561.361.3148 I i MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRIrT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Marrie Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Legg (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305) 477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-DIAZ & VILLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozyman Haks Engineers, Architects and Land (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting (305) 265-5400 Shawn Stanley Consultants 786.762.4115 Mark i URS Corporation 1 (305) 262-7466 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 13, 2014 16 f\AIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 ext. 6230 vusbelg.onzalezOmiamibeachf1.20V 13,21.1 N4 37''( 2-4 9 N.:7,4 7-6? A L 0.1 tEEZ-1:0 L2 -,c,u/ E lc , A.1 L CZ_ Dz-rFEMA/ 5\5c /sit-i-- F-N611,"re2 lA . 3. 97/ 7( • ea v*, ve 14-6 C 815 eci_re e th 1.Q 1)k- iYwg 1-1A k ( )5) rnE---,S (43 . NEr q(-1 Co-( SLkr_Li 6'1( iii\-Nk• L=L-L.A,t---Lo@ KA VAS • 304 ft-OjaY" _0 c.Ck V on, SAL - 0-0Sf.AJ t,E12,6- Dc (-1\1) r-W8Qsf,i‘f%acc,aoNle-F--,GOikl\ S40a\Ae—C_ t3) 305 LI L.C5-2qC-40 lot cc*-. coril , %6 Co -2_43 eSA. - AA B EAC H CITY OF MLMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITION.AL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPAiNY...NAME - • - PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE.PRINT) E-1'L L ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelg.onzalezamiamibeachfl. ov ext. 6230 5Aik c /110 y ,4mi. . a r/1 CIS 3os- 6773 _ (/a ness4-- 17-6- 305 73e 73er m tide 7 nest. Lei ude 7 e-e -cow S _1 JJk ken 1 Ko gcrp C buYaet 1 7A 6e4-11t, 1\1\&MID vt ev-Ive:a6A 144/.?.04//loci/A 4/./iv "7°I J CITY OF MI=AMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 20 14-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CRIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelczonzalez cc,miamibeachfl.2:ov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovtec 352-459-1974 lanceainnovtec.com James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn@ksfla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Tom_Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkskiawadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 3.05.-567-1888 Jennv.alonso �lin.com Ext. 4034 cit Staci L. Bolinger Durikelberger Engineering&Testing 561-494-7006 slbolin eAer @terracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 Wiliiam.cravenpuretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 jprierv@aleassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters & Associates 407-830-8700 jkempabpa-engineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates(cc gmail.com MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS • Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzun u.:cphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin LIVS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin.wlivs.net Nadia -E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCI Associates' (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305) 461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954. 24.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954) 435-701.0 i � MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibecchfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 12, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Becch, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT • Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") • OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miarnibeachfl.gov. - • Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez , 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. • cerely, erns rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 7, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicpurchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall - 4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION # 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION #2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 1 2 I Miami Beach } RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal., 5 1 � { SincerelV °S enis Procurement Director • • 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIO\ S ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMIBEACH_ Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG rl �I Eye .� (§ F �� i, ry}.,,,g9 4�i5 I;m"t1 `_`!1 F B PAC a e. SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase ('Mivw.publicourchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term, with two (2) one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design/Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19, 2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado anmiamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 2014-346-SR 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence." The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=1309 7&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES... CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 E ,/ d —, i • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011-3747, a five (5) point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFQ 2014-346-SR 6 AM: BEACH twenty(120) calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 ` IAAA BEACH services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then RFQ 2014-346-SR 8 MIAMI I EAC !. B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2014-346-SR 9. A NA 1 _ `d ! 1i a�w 4 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2014-346-SR 10 MIAMI BEACH. SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall . submit two. (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. T4B_'t- yet Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects, provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED, ULI,AICP,APA. RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 BEACH d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. • "..TAB 2 f: Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplieroortal.dnb.com/webapoiwcs/stores/serilet/SupolierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. • RFQ 2014-346-SR 12 B�,.. , }H} � ✓ f f J V 1 E I k AC 1 � Approach and Methodology 9Y For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). E�3- .r.,,.....•.,x+n.rn,;s a.x.-:-:r.- .r±re -•._:.a_..:.i,.,,cam-.:.u,x.:ru..:__- ,..- :ro rte.:cr.:.. ...,-..�- �a-.,r�- w......._. ,.;.r.....__. i RFQ 2014-346-SR 13 AA 1 AA 1 BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2 (Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions;or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s) (using the same criteria). p Qualitative Cnferia� r;� ;�rt l j; r ��'�,j , �t Maximum Points = .' .1 Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise DBE firms. �Y ` , TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS " ' t{` 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. s ` Step 2 Quantitative Cntena rug � , , l a '`, �: t , A i L�a n _ i-�: .�-,:. 11.R , � k +• 1 fy FGs{ , -�. iS .,J ,; 5 a a �•- ._ 1 . Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three 3)years. See Section 4 below. { � :; e-TOTAL;AVAILABLE-STEP 2 POINTS �,' Y: :10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 A s. 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: • Proposer Proposer Proposer A. . B C , Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 • Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final:Ranking's .. ,1 2,. * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A AAA B EACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 vusbelaonzalezla7miamibeachfl.aov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose, in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. benefits,and$12.921hr without benefits. same(in a particular year1 Proposals' failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement lc, RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 to the living wage requirement. 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit.to.domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 _ Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 DISCLOSURE=AND DISCLAIMER SECTION, = a ` f.: 1:. The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG` Appendix A— Page 5 z ` PROPOSER;CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Ref uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B = A 1 BEACH i � o Bid " RFQ No. PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified 0f future solicitations by the City. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service OTHER. (Please specify) -0:•.. a.x ...: ...;t:r:< v. _. .._..,. ,.i+.t,'_ -'.,: _.a._.,,,ex:arH' : .:,,.::s`':_ ._a.. ,cr« c -_„ ..,._-k.--. .....-.w:;n.:: _... -.s•..-:-.»r-._.. We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: ?v "v;r r/ •_v'5:3' =�IJ.:'S! !:••+�r.'.T„N•. "...::: -<..ss*-�,:. :.�.r:.. :':ass.. ..f;.. _ _� :'qr.i?.-:r°am.f'µr -.- -._.v, +3'jJ:.Y'i-, a.._ nYrf 3,r_,..y5 3 _ aly.l»_u t:..-r:YS I' k�'..:fryn iA Y• .:r I: =;^`.�. Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B — Page 1 APPENDIX C ‘ InCArH MI / L Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT I700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five(5) projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and 9 Y Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes; Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering (Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems; TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages; Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks • Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets; Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display, Theater, etc.) • Lighting (Exterior, Streets, Memorials, Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional, Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities (Parks, Marinas, etc.) • Rehabilitation (Buildings, Structures, Facilities, etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils &Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures '.S'r_Y:i�&Yra^k n ,'st:-Y :.1:.:i_.r._:wit:"..'SF >.: !... d°-z.::.a•�T R`a-..,fig'7 .:tYFCil tt_.1,. �nY...:+UC-�:� . Xre'.is ..:t^>.:1 ..,".^'E,:r _ .. :1.....1..;.! `4iN"•'!- RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping, GIS, and other services: O High Definition Services(HDS) O Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) O Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) O Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) o Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) and Underground Utility Services o These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum o f 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling & Facilities • Testing & Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply, Treatment and Distribution • Zoning; Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status (particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C APPENDIX D A FA---Nd \ u Special Conditions RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Appendix C 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D - Page 1 APPENDIX E \ A 4 /\ /\ 1 :0 A ov Lir-AL Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 A 1 a 11 9 tk 17'tk INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 —Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V" as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E – Page 1 APPENDIX F RA \ IV\ A 1. - 17 Sample Contract RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXX)U XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE XX)UCXXXXXXXxCXXXXxxCXXXXXXxCXXXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 I SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXX)UUUU<XXXXXXXXXX)UUUUU<X FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_ day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXX)0000UU< XXXX, a Florida XXXXXXXXXXX having its principal office at XXXXXXXXX)UCXXXXXXXXXXX)UUU<XX (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXX • XXXXXXXXXX . 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule"A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CON TR UC TI N: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally y binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. "Additional shall mean those services, in addition to 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional Services s a , the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C— Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G — Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved)), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manage"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any • non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; Se ices, b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule "D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: • 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXX)(X, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XX)XXXXX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof g) Y 9 Y Project Y p without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of $150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars O P Y ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for 9 y errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMS\A&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXX XXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $)0000 (X)( Historic Preservation Board / Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $)0OCXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. I ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 MIAMI BEACH .., . I.' ,' '''"- ' , -'"1414'''it%...ir4waim tiiii.,...Me: ■ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Professional Architectural & Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on " • an "As Needed Basis" , .. 'I ; , :''.• ; ;. ■ a■, I I 1 1 1 ; . - . . • i 4 2 ,„. . .'. . , : 1:r '.. ... : -. .. . . . . • r . , .. ,. I". . _ . ,. ., i . Li . .. . RFQ 2014-346-YG - ' 7 --- -' - • • GROUP A - PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN ZYSCOVI CH ARCHITECTS WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES 100 N Biscayne Blvd., 27th Floor Miami, FL 33132 T 305.372.5222 W www.zyscovich.com M I AM I BEACH RFQ 2014-346—YG GROUP A PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN - . iii , 414 I 9"1-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. Cover Letter :.- �. Minimum Qualifications Requirements 3 r 2. Experience & Qualifications 13 d s n - _ 2.1 Projects 14 2.2 Resumes 35 R 3. Approach & Methodology 46 4. Additional Information 54 ,t$ x. 4 -.--- - , , i.,,,, ,):%.; : r . I 1. ill..,.' » _ ,. - ''C ZYSCOVICH ,,, A R C H I T E C T S '11, F or;r1fir WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES lit - S - M I AM I BEACH RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN ■ ■ U U 1 ;;;49. ' . Cover Letter & . - Minimum Qualifications Requirements -- . - 1 ..r d A ., . , ,...... ..... ____ e .,, Z.'_ ----41-- - a 'r . iocif i j , . ' a I1 41 11 2 6! 1 4..or4 #ill t I , 4• . T) �. y 1.4 f s # ..� rte. e"r 2 ZYSCOVICH 1 f .y,;Fl A R C H I T E C T S . --4 WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES i f �. 1 BUILDINGS INTERIORS LANDSCAPES CITIES z YS C O\I C H 100 N Biscayne Blvd.27th Fl Miami.FL 33132.2304 A R C H I T E C T S t 305.372.5222 F 305.577.4521 e info @zyscovich.com December 2,2014 w www.zyscovich.com • MIAMI • NEW YORK Alex Denis, Director Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: RFQ 2014-346-YG; Professional Architecture& Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis"for Group A-Architecture: Planning and Urban Design Dear Mr. Denis and Members of the Selection Committee: ZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS is pleased to submit our qualifications to the City of Miami Beach to provide Planning and Urban Design Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" for a three year contract term, with two one year renewal options at the discretion of the City of Miami Beach. Zyscovich has been known since 1977 for its award-winning planning, urban design, and town planning projects. Zyscovich is one of the largest multi-disciplinary design firms in South Florida,with offices in Miami,West Palm Beach,Orlando,New York City,and Bogota,Colombia. With over 90 design professionals,Zyscovich has provided municipalities in South Florida and beyond with site planning, master planning, urban design, and place making design services for public facilities. We have successfully integrate visioning, branding,and concept development with the needs of the local economy and the desires of the community. We pride ourselves on creating designs that are a source of civic and municipal pride for the communities that we serve. Zyscovich's professional staff is composed of some of the most creative and innovative urban designers in the country, and our team's enthusiasm for placemaking is embedded in all of our projects.This process begins in our design studio and ends in the field.Our vast experience in public sector urban design and master planning and our understanding of market feasibility help to ensure that our final plans can be realized.Our firm is known for developing creative solutions to stimulate and implement high quality redevelopment while protecting neighborhoods. We have been recognized for this level of dedication and expertise in planning by the American Planning Association and the American Institute of Architects,and will continue to bring this same enthusiasm to the City of Miami Beach. Our skills in facilitating quick responses to public agencies will continue to be beneficial to the City of Miami Beach.We are experts in assessing your needs and expounding on them,ensuring code compliance,community receptiveness and cost control. Our site planning and programming experience of civic venues includes thoroughly examining existing conditions and adjacencies to other structures and facilities. Our experience also includes fitting large facilities on challenging sites, coordinating building massing and orientations, zoning regulations, site utility locations and other impacts, such as traffic circulation and parking and environmental impacts, all of which will be thoroughly analyzed. We are knowledgeable of the current rules and regulations of local,state,and federal agencies as they apply to the City of Miami Beach. With 26 LEED°accredited professionals on staff, we are also fully capable of providing sustainable designs for a variety of project types. Our approach integrates physical planning solutions with economic development,capital improvements,and community input. We will use stakeholder recommendations and past planning efforts to understand the community issues and concerns and transform this content into cohesive and viable solutions.We have vast experience building consensus by listening to the community and presenting ideas which motivate residents to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community workshops and presentations and can offer this expertise, along with our proven ability to work with existing developers and city officials to complete projects of any scope or scale.Our design process considers all aspects of a place—past and present development patterns,population characteristics, local needs for better communities, history and culture,and economic obstacles and opportunities—to create an authentic environment specific to each location. Licenses Architectural AAC.001431 ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S As the authors of numerous design standards and regulations,we bring a very specific understanding of these dynamics as they apply to the City of Miami Beach. It is hard for us to imagine a place that is a better fit than the for our fundamental approach to community redevelopment, historic preservation, land use planning and urban design. We have created master plans in more than 30 different municipalities,including multiple projects produced under continuing contracts. We are honored to have been awarded,as associate Architects and Planners,the All Aboard Florida project,which will provide a private passenger rail between Miami and Orlando. Zyscovich was also awarded the Architectural Services contract for the 7th Avenue Transit Village Project, a transit oriented development(TOD) and multi-modal hub for Miami-Dade County.The firm is also completing the construction of the Seminole Tribe of Florida's Brighton Reservation Tribal Services & Public Safety Project. We also recently completed a New Vision and Future Land Use Plan for the entire City of Jacksonville.Zyscovich also worked with Miami-Dade County's Equitable Distribution Program continuing contract to design the renovations of the Coconut Grove Library, and also worked with the Miami-Dade Parks and Recreation Department to provide recommendations for design criteria alterations to incorporate the new County mandate for LEED Silver compliance with all new construction projects. We currently hold the City of Miami Beach/ CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract for Planning and Urban Design Services. Some of our notable projects in Miami Beach include the Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan and Update, the Lincoln Cinema, Retail Complex and Parking Garage,and the Miami Beach High School Master Plan and Phased Replacement. Though we are a large firm, our principals provide direct attention to each project from inception to completion. In addition to the leadership and guidance from our firm's principals,we have assembled an in-house team expressly chosen for their expertise in municipal planning and urban design and their knowledge of the City of Miami Beach and its regulating agencies.We are confident that our attached qualifications package will further describe our capabilities and areas of expertise. We look forward to continuing to provide the City of Miami Beach with Continuing Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis." Sincerely, ZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS Bernard Zyscovich, FAIA President Licenses Architectural AAC.001431 Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1:3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalezia7miamibeachfl.Qov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and 4 Y com p executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Zyscovich, Inc. No of Years in Business: 37 No of Years in Business Locally: 37 No of Employees: 90 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Zyscovich Architects FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 100 N. Biscayne Blvd.,27th Floor CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33132 TELEPHONE NO.: 305.372.5222 TOLL FREE NO.: n/a FAX NO.: 305.577.4521 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 100 N. Biscayne Blvd.,27th Floor CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33132 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Bernard Zyscovich, FAIA ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305.372.5222 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: n/a ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: bernard@zyscovich.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-2754852 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 3 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. Not Applicable SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES WITH A CONTROLLING FINANCIAL INTEREST Zyscovich Architects City Commissioner Joy Malakoff;$500 contribution on 10/21/2013 Bernard Zyscovich Jose Murguido 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. ZYSCOVICH BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT The successful business operation and reputation of Zyscovich, Inc.is built upon the principles of fair dealing and ethical conduct of our employees.Our reputation for integrity and excellence requires careful observance of the spirit and letter of all applicable laws and regulations, as well as a scrupulous regard for the highest standards of conduct and personal integrity. The continued success of Zyscovich, Inc. is dependent upon our employees'trust,and we are dedicated to preserving that trust. Employees owe a duty to Zyscovich, Inc. and its clients to act in a way that will merit the continued trust and confidence of the public. Zyscovich, Inc. will comply with all applicable laws and regulations and expects its principals, associates, City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYSCOVICH 4 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements supervisors,and employees to conduct business in accordance with the letter,spirit,and intent of all relevant laws and to refrain from any illegal,dishonest, or unethical conduct. In general, the use of good judgment, based on high ethical principles, will guide you with respect to lines of acceptable conduct. If a situation arises where it is difficult to determine the proper course of action,the matter should be discussed openly with your supervisor, Human Resources Manager, COO or CFO for advice and consultation. Compliance with this policy of business ethics and conduct is the responsibility of every company employee. Disregarding or failing to comply with this standard of business ethics and conduct could lead to disciplinary action, up to and including possible termination of employment. 6. - . . '- ..• - - ,!s . -- .. _ • _.. . •- • _ •••. - •• • --- -• RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 • City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 5 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 'RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 6 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals' are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt 9.19.14 Addendum 1 11.12.14 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 9.30.14 Addendum 2 11.1 8.14 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 10.07.14 Addendum 3 11.24.14 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 10.17.14 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 1 0.31.14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 _ _ Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C Obi I C H 7 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipients convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 8 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Bernard Zyscovich;FAL& President Signature of Pro oser's Authorized Representative: Date: 12/01/2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this 1" day of December 2014,personally appeared before me Bernard Zysco4Vdt, FAIA County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President of Zyscovich,lnc. , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Lisette Marie Sierra #FF 131587 Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: 09.04.18 LI$ETTE MARIE SIERRA ,� .s Notary Public-State of Florida GG�I:��"L- ,y ;ii My Comm.Expires Sep 4.2018 0 #;: iar Commission#FF 131587 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 9 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R CH I T EC TS Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements CORPORATE CHARTERS, PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS Attached are the current corporate licenses,registrations with the Department of State and specialty certifications for our team. AC*705211 STATE OF FLORIDA State of Florida `` ` "' "�°"" '5 1141i0I111212441114,SDEQN1Alitr ,- - De Department of State The d below A� f Named below u M. Under the provisions of qe� .2 Expiration dote: FIB 2s. is..'1:.P ."i - -wr_ IOe 2sC�AIlliSlLw TL 7 • 3 `• I certify from the records of this office that ZYSCOVICH,INC.is a corporation xT>►1[ i 33132190A 1 a t organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on October 30,1986, effective October 30,1986. iniEr The document number of this corporation is M40936. tt�� nespir',is REQUIRED e-.sw- I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through 1 December 31,2013,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report AC#701656 STATE OF FLORIDA was filed on January 3,2013,and its status is active. DrnaT Doge____ IMIEro lrzott ',:• ltostasasmoss I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. cry E.l1 tiZ t '•ter l Uv ' i j S The A*C5ITECT '„' leaned below IS LICOISIm Under the prooietene of ,•4. t expiration date: !0 25. 20 i•,, r- 7.i. ' ,.y� ETS�O�OVIpCI�L ISSlh3D 3 Given under my hand and the fir 1 Elf •Ef.11D MS Great Seal of the State of Florida MIARI tL 33132 "I'n' at Tallahassee,the Capital,this is the Third day of January,2013 NICK score MILMN �" -- 4W5Ar11il044JlllV atipt\ 1`, r'' A.• -' AC#707481 STATES!,FLORIDA Secretary of State 1 i I Coo ev Iv' 1" .L'._ e Y ._...-Z. .,.-"..:75, __ __ - Aotheutic.tien ID:CC9659715038 The ! It%/j f Sawed below Ili MOM= Mmes the pro lows of Chs> .� - t 'r� Ti authenticate this certi5 te,vuit the following site,euter this Eapix tits date.MS 204 20 i , ,. ID,a.d then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.suubiz.org/cert•uthver.html Wrier+ IV' NI 3311! - v.. { :mow sstJSSAYYT oYoDt�fw��oDaa pgp,nV ed RF1OtldeE0BY W __ ,•;as Local Business Tax Receipt .;. STATE OF FLORIDA Miami—Dade County, State of Florida .ter DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND THIS IS NOTA BILL DO NOT PAY °% PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 5262571 AR0008200 ISSUED: 02/05/2013 NUMWeea NAMI/LOCATION RICIWr NO. EXPIRES ZYSCOVICH INC RENEWAL SEPTEMBER 30,2015 ARCHITECT 100 BISCAYNE BLVD 26FLOOR 5499421 Must be displayed at place of business GRAFTON.R THORN MIAMI FL 33132 Pursuant to County Code Chapter 8A-Art 9 8 10 OWNER SEC TYPE OF BUSINESS PAVM[NT R[C[IV[D ZYSCOVICH INC 212 PA:CORP PARTNERSHIP FIRM syT rjo:S.eeroR IS LICENSED under the provisions of Ch 481 FS Employee(s) S LC26000298 545.00 07/16J2014 Evasion date FEB 26 2015 L13022520C1516 �u�t� CHECK21-14-022409 Theewe wiroTa oemekst�alde[IndbelowTse.Tie4.siIbae.Nestw, v ~wywNewrltnlaMn�lifewtlreaa sideimh.114.60.... wW' wlfweaer[d The RECEIPT NO.Neve malt eddspplayedda,.ail caer eadd Wide.Miami-0N.QM Sae ea.171. he men ieenseae,visit rawiwieaa City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z YS C OV I C H 10 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 13:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements The U.S.Green Building Council bembylmmob Is A I Al Ft .Certificate of Membership Zs balanced,eemaemme coalition e.. aMberw .be tna,wp,pmnmmn . r efin im,amibuilkoplawirStaran mark. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION :2 Ikreerd Z, , December 31.2O 04:- c]wr..tlnbroonhacigD 1,4—C Ftt,— • JJ • J l:1 1JJ LEED 7a:, AP GBCI 8U+.^ GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Russell Thorn Grafton Suria Yaffar LEED AP BUILDING DESIGN+CONSTRUCTION LEED"'ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL J J J .+tt rx N)•.vt♦• IS:[.•t 1,• :niltfM-4AT U.fanrm JJJ December w,YHn ..pun December-^e.?�!I I. J J'J . ,�,�e._ . GBCI iftnril■-• ...�.__._._._ _!�,e.wts tom._ � __..._ !w�S The U.S.Green Building Council Thom Grafton bessmv mfally ereememmbli 6mcrklm.3i:n. roan Isaidons4soir initallrtae►ioninduatry and'he !mode+b MI lbtmgymuillmemwmemtiD w:iynptr},%,3 c:twn...Aline RAM!%V IM RooatanWWI N. .nyWt Iv be..w"nted the m&of LEEDS v2 Accredited Professional AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION lja_•'.-T LEER.- rm__,'.„i. ,_ ... r.......m rr. tei , -,• DaemberG31.DOD: m.+m Hyde,Chem.. S lathed Sedelmt,humbler; mated Mundt.,Cu.= teem".t mereem City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z YS C O V I C H Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S �rt Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE The schedules below document Zyscovich's current insurance coverage:Schedule A certifies our Commercial General Liability, Business Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability and Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions coverage, and Schedule B confirms our Worker's Compensation policy. SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B ZYSCINC-01 ZOONLRLE2 --., ZYSCBNGO, ID4r1 ��R° CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I °";,,,' R° CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I °';,,,'�;,�1( THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MUTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON M CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIOHTS UPON THE CERTEIGTE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE ODES NOT AFFEIPATNELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED EY THE FOUCES CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND.EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.THIS CERTSINGTE OF NSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITNTE A CONTRACT SEIYMEM THE ISSUING 1/8U M(S),AUT11011® BELOW. DNS CERTIFIGTE OF INSURANCE ODES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(•).AUTHORIEED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER AND THE CEIRIFICATE HOLDER REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER.AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: 0 Ma 00060 s Bolder I an ADOITgWLL NBURIEL.polAY(N6)must No•Ndmsm.E BUpR00ATI ON M WANED.asIBM In IMPORTANT:N II.ominous nobler A al ADDITIONAL INSURED.Ma paARNG must be maenad.N SUBROGATION IS WAIVED.su030 a M Wan and ee0dMons of Ws policy,and.poSN may rap.an endowment.t.A s0ana0R S Ida o•MU•dew nreanhr MOH Is We Oa toms and eanMbns of Ole poICy,certain 100tH may Mule an en40000R nt A Matam•a on BIN e.3Oeab Oar not eon.HEMS to Me e01tNlae s Nei4r In INN M such•Bdarsa meEs). owaneab holder b IN of such Blaarm•mpe. MOM= cMeame,"ZOraWa QOnSalel 'B0O1°r =ev ColMSw.IR Altar,Peeler B Preece.LLC r1Aw mt.— Automate Oma Prasrins Stamm.Agency,Inc mrBSI usiO WM Governors square Bold W:(>as)832-7800 I I.Ie Ar Noel ss2,2413 ,ADP Boo.era r.• I AB ens 301 warm AEGIHMb3gcaH IDADDI Rowland.NJ OTMS ✓and labs.FL MIS MS. mane.API RIMOCO.arNS AAR8 Merger RRSOON SLSSr BOBS A:Travelers Indemnity CO.d AMID. 2EBBH owns A:BEIC-Bads..Employers I memo mem•:Lexington ITS Co 18437 aeas Zysco.lOB,Inc. Ness a: ZyR214N.Inc. BBS e: 100 Biscayne Bold name c: 100 Nat Biscayne Bw1wrd Ssra: 2781 Flom MAW O: era nee tare Miami,PL 33132. L r ta SBar. l es a: Nampa: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE PANNIER REVISION NIMBEM: CI NERAGES CERIWICATE NIMBEI: REVwN RUMOUR TINS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POUCIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TD THE INSURED NAME°ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POISES CF INSURANCE LISTED BEL.HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POl1C/PERIOD INDICATED NOTOAHBTANDNG ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION O'ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT NTH RESPECT TO VMION THIS INDICATE°.NOTIMTHSTANDNO ANY REQUREMENT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANN CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT OATH RESPECT TO MUCH THIS QRTIFlGTE AMY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POOUCIESsUNTS St..MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS EXCLUSIONS AND COIDITIOSD OF SUCH POLICIES.OMITS SHOW WY INVE BEEN REFDeuC�LEyD BY PAID IMAMS Teased 01 wBl�r MAT miner Mg=wa101YYYh MI. ti.. TM w IMAM= �ary 601M SIMMIS eawbrrn■.`., , 11B• ��•esaIMLLBeaaT SAW OauAREME S 1,000.000 OBrULWYSS" EACH OCCUNNEKS 1 A IL I0UN0 cw oBlrAI LMwm 01400200000 02G014 022671 P�mpliA wM 1 1000.ON —COISrIMCILL mIetAL llAaerrY I�;..•.X� -.'�r'. S JIIII I CL.NaMAr 0 occem MEC SWVarna. S 10.000 OIB1saeAOS❑OCCUR mrmwr�sM.l 1 K...LAnd BURY 1 1,000.000 MEMOS SAw WWI 1 aEMOw.AOOAmAn s 2.000.000 GBarLADOrGm 1 aerLAOSEwrElrnArruESrs: rmea c's-mmPma too s 2.000.000 OenAaaEEDATErwrAPrLEt m-. rEa011trs-caWSAr 1 —T msuet n n Lae 1 muss n n ape AarmsaUMW, ,=MOLE UM! , 1,..... _Mar.aLn...nT COMM SM.Mr A X Me Pro BASQ71M32 402014 07/1016 •IMO Am Awns 1 _rM'T wrO =SLY MAY ere wee) s — *AL MOM —scHmAS NOES SMlAr Os..■re S �ima •Orr NUN nrMlrm$ °""r X I®AINn. z p / HBA ALMS r r :iii 1 x MOOLLAUM H�IA ro 1 S.0N0,ON _rrrLS LAY H° Wm OWAENCE 1 A 0cawuse coasswce 000304/7101 41212014 0100610 .00Raoo 1 5,000,000 earmune CLAW.* AoSSAm f ran X I wren".s 10.000 , OS I I RE,BRmM 1 S nTMO•mPre•Tp I m�rRr t 1 Loa AOoORMrnfYW X I AAIA00 Lou arBeaTSB LAWS/ A MonaSraaaRneamms©AI 0e3G373N ,/14/3011 0/1411015 EL ELOO.CLA rr S 1.N10.0M nmOrlrrOMMII 0/10 El nr• E1 iMIkppBei 1 1..... wr A E prNE.MONO..1 1.000,4X0 •arfarAE7MIN EL WASS-GEM OYES s viers nprSClvrwO7OPBUTOMSM. EL COWS-MUM'W.1 ovarsOFOgEATlwssm. ELOBBSE-PwL+wr s V.A. O Preen..LY. 026306/34 022614 4712616 Each Chen 2.000,000 B CIMISaYtla Reds 02830687/ 41212014 412100 Annual Agpag.O 8,000,000 mods r comma'Lamm as/saris arm swan aL Aram Amms sows A ow Ham..ammo nailsnr s arrsnneer0a■lm0AAel1 S MBA Win NI.ASrsMoons BASw Sr.spa mrwmw P reneelenol ursey Retread.Date 4/,He77:ProNSbna Ums1My D•WNIla SWAM Each CI WA CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF The ABM Desals ED Fou0311 ere CANCELLED WORE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED FOJCIES S CJVICELLED BEFORE THE 10032306 DATE IMEROF.mane WAIL 00 DITUNERED I0 •s•E c I r a N FOR USE wRH PROPOSALS ONLY THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NONCE WILL B8 DBrvERED m �ZySCOVICI4 Inc°° A«OIDANCE WTM THE POLCY PROMNON1 ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOUCY PROVISIONS AunlaNm EEwTAhs I4.1II01®0.11MIDLTY1 01.082010 ACORD CORPORATION.AE rigs reserved O 18ES2010 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserve!. ACORD 23 MINIOS) The ACORD nom mid 1000 ere r ptatarW wens et ACOIID AOOIRD as(201005) The ACORD nose and logo are repeated marks of ACORD City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 12 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S M I AM I BEACH RFQ 2014-346—YG GROUP A PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN a U U -: . . it t' i. Experience 2 & Qualifications 4 • _, 2.1 Projects 1 i-L-: At. - 2.2 Resumes 1 I ..........41_ _II 0 41 4 . -- _ 0 ,/*, . set 4 4 . _ 'Z.i:...R ni,y._., 4.L -• 1 ,ar� mot_ / ' -r ZYSCOVICH b ,,P ..-'11.47 A R C H I T E C T S °+ .01 1'110191111.01r WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES iiil • ., , a Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications FIRM PROFILE Zyscovich Architects is a 90+-person integrated Urban Design,Architecture and Interior Design firm headquartered in downtown Miami with additional offices in Orlando,West Palm Beach,New York City,and Bogota.Zyscovich Architects,a Florida-based corporation, was formed in 1977 and incorporated in 1986. The firm has garnered a - national reputation for its expertise in the area of market-based design .f. ,,n w-:.. •t �1� solutions,as well as for the creative and implementable strategies it brings 1111 '•-� �y4! y to complex redevelopment master plans and urban design projects.Over x �.! the past 37 years,the firm has produced numerous master plans and urban - - design regulations that successfully integrate visioning and design concepts j - '1 ii it with the needs of the local economy and the desires of the community.We t have provided these services to both the public and private sectors—locally, nationally and internationally. SERVICES AND EXPERTISE:As a firm that has produced varied scales of urban designs and master plans in diverse cities throughout the country,Zyscovich brings a breadth of knowledge on current effective processes and creative tools that can shape the public realm through carefully crafted guidelines. Our team has in-depth knowledge and a solid understanding of urban planning,code writing,municipal code implementation,and how to effectively integrate multiple districts, agencies, institutions and priorities into a coherent vision. This experience, combined with our considerable in-house resources,will allow us to expeditiously complete any of the proposed work. A CUSTOMIZED APPROACH TO CREATING VALUE: We approach urban getting real about planning and design projects by identifying opportunities to capitalize on past and present rbanism characteristics of a particular place.We have termed this design philosophy Real Urbanise. Real Urbanism®is a concept that supports sustainable development by understanding how •.-1-"r=4: a city or neighborhood came to be and considers past and present development patterns, local needs for better communities,and economic obstacles and opportunities.Our focus 7 is on merging economic development opportunities with appropriate design solutions. - `r Solutions reflect the community stakeholders' needs and desires and match the cultural Jr aesthetic which is inherent in the community,with special attention to scale, character, wr'' and preservation.This design philosophy is featured in two books published by the firm's +•- .''ti t Managing Principal, Bernard Zyscovich: Getting Real About Urbanism: Contextual �;;;; t Design for Cities and l'ARCAEDIZIONI's Monograph Zyscovich Architecture and Real Urbanism,featuring Zyscovich projects with a preface by Frank O. Gehry. Getting Real About Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities WORKING WITH MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS: Zyscovich has specific and extensive experience working with city officials and key stakeholders to develop clear Visions and implementable Master Plans. By collaborating with stakeholders and City staff,and forming a true partnership,we are able to identify the most important issues in a community and to develop realistic and feasible solutions to those issues.As part of our master planning and visioning efforts,we favor building consensus by presenting ideas which motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community workshops,and presentations. NATIONAL EXPERTISE AND RECOGNITION BY OUR PEERS:Many of our projects have been published in national periodicals,including Urban Land Magazine.Mr.Zyscovich has served on the City of Miami Urban Development Review Board,the Miami Beach Design Review Board,and is a Past Chairman of the Miami Design Preservation League, the historic preservation group responsible for establishing the Art Deco District of Miami Beach.Our Director of Design, Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA, LEED®AP has been honored as the Urban Designer of the Year by AIA Miami.Zyscovich's staff includes more than 20 LEED Accredited Professionals who also bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in the realm of Sustainable Design.Some of our relevant awards include:AIA Florida's Firm of the Year;the APA Florida Award of Excellence for the City of West Palm Beach Planning and Zoning;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for the Downtown Miami DDA Master Plan Study;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award and the APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study for Midtown Miami. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 13 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE RECORD Zyscovich employs cutting-edge research to address the ever-changing landscape of urban planning and architecture. We are known for our implementation of proven technology and high performance green design strategies that improve building performance,reduce long-term operational costs,and protect the environment.Our design philosophy focuses on the origins and evolution of a site, and opportunities to add value in appropriate ways. Density, diversity, activity, safety, greenspace, pedestrian friendliness and mass transportation—values such as these are applied, promoted and articulated in projects whether civic,academic or commercial.It is the firm's belief that great design is not only aesthetically pleasing,but complements,enhances and is respectful of the surroundings. Our proposed team has extensive experience in the design of projects of the different sizes,scopes and complexities that may be required by the City of Miami Beach.We currently hold numerous continuing service contracts of varying sizes for a variety of clients,including the City of Fort Lauderdale,the " - City of Miami,Miami-Dade County,and Florida International =M :' _ University, to name a few. For the past 37 years the firm has i. -`_ --,------ .- -+ ;. r c provided urban design, architectural design and master ' -Tip t — planning services to more than 40 different municipalities ' „ •: •=_._ � ' r L • " , _, � =; and public entities.Our clients also include the Cities of West 7_-� - _ —' i', ";z A4' a,. .-.. Palm Beach, Jacksonville, and New Orleans, as well as the ti i ''' , .y ' 1..t Counties of Broward, Palm Beach and Monroe.Our record of .; .._* i,7' - / . performance,including our willingness to meet time and budget requirements,is proven by the fact that a vast majority of our L.:' �,,;.�-,:-- ,-e;1 ,, ; IF clients are repeat clients,not just for a project or two,but year 'P after year because of our commitment to high quality design °' r �' '�``,.j Y 9 q Y 9 . - .. and responsive customer services.Our long history of efficient 4` ,a% 1;,'''.. r* ` contract administration is also evidenced by our favorable client performance ratings. City of Miami Omni 14th Street Media&Entertainment District Zyscovich also has considerable experience in planning and urban design. Our .5, ,ir professionals includes several licensed urban planners that have produced numerous - {` master plans and urban design regulations that successfully integrate design A .' P 9 9 Y 9 9 """ ,4 concepts with the needs of the local economy and the desires of the community. ' ,‹ ;�,, b!� We have provided these services to both the public and private sectors nationally I Ail,r ' 'i i 1 and internationally.We have specific and extensive experience working with city - - . officials and key stakeholders to develop clear and implementable master plans.• .. n �. 7,, By collaborating with the city,official and staff and forming a true partnership,we ' -- - 'r" _ _ are able to identify the most important issues and develop realistic and feasible \. ' .; • solutions. Y A:, -x As part of our master planning and visioning efforts we favor building consensus by presenting ideas which motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive NVI , t: °°, �` '--,r ',. vision. We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings, },.. --' ... .,r j.i' community workshops and presentations.Our master planning and urban design ¢d •� ' s,'r� ; services include redevelopment,urban design,neighborhood planning,community '‘ia, ` `'.1 N ,� ■ outreach, zoning and design standards, land use and comprehensive planning, M � if`�a . •. 9 9 P P 9 ' ,,,1 i�.il�Ipl , Q, .. - master planning,visioning,public/private initiatives and infill development.Our ,_ , p ,=' extensive experience combined with our commitment to personalized service, ~ will bring additional value to the City of Miami Beach.We have a dedicated staff i 'III Il"Fi �' t _` • ""- comprised of planners,architects and designers who possess a passion for creating ��_'. %' :.', �.,iw. '' , •, inspiring places in which to work, live,and play. ill, , ! i, MOB City of Miami Omni 14th Street Media&Entertainment District City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 14 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH/CMBCRA CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Miami Beach,FL WASHINGTON AVENUE STUDY-VISION AND MASTER PLAN KEY FEATURES Zyscovich Architects was commissioned to do a conceptual master planning study to Visioning examine the current development guidelines for the Washington Avenue corridor between Urban Fabric Revitalization Fifth Street and Lincoln Road.Zyscovich studied potential changes to the guidelines that Master Planning will encourage appropriate,context-sensitive redevelopment and made recommendations Context Sensitive intended to enhance the vitality of the corridor.The study analyzed the impact of additional Redevelopment floor area ratio(FAR)and height.An increase in the FAR of any property requires a voter Maintenance of Historic referendum, making it necessary for the community to be able to visualize the impacts Structures of such changes. Historic Facade Restoration At present, portions of Washington Avenue contain bars and night clubs which are only Increased F.A.R. activated at night, empty during day. portions leaving historic storefronts em t durin the da . Other ortions of AExisting Condition ssessments Washington Avenue contain T-shirt shops,souvenir shops,tattoo parlors and other types of retail that do not enhance the corridor or serve the local community.The City of Miami Highest and Best Use/Land Value Optimization Analysis Beach hopes to provide better maintenance of historic structures along the corridor. The ability to develop additional floor area above the ground floor retail in exchange for Growth Management and Y P 9 g Smart Growth Initiatives improving ground floor uses and restoring historic facades was explored. Land Development Regulations The scope of work included massing studies and perspective studies at various key locations, Sustainable Design Guidelines particularly where significant historic structures are located and where the tallest building Market Based Solutions heights are proposed. The study depicted the current development potential of the Zoning Recommendations Washington Avenue corridor and the proposed development potential.Various scenarios Community and Stakeholder were represented, with increased FAR and height, and with reduced parking along the Involvement corridor. CLIENT/CONTACT The fact that the majority of buildings along Washington Avenue are contributing structures Jimm M City of Miami l Beach oraes in a historic district was taken into account.The study identified the relationships between 305.67y 3.7010 the current and proposed building sections to ensure compatibility with the surrounding JimmyMorales®miamibeachfl. neighborhood.The study also visualized ideal maximum heights,number of stories,parking gOv requirements,and FAR for three geographically different and varied block sections of the DURATION study area. First Contract:1990-2005(Due to age of project) Second Contract:2010-0n- .; . i 3 t . 9 ..! going d h llf:A",C1 rank ! ft= E;, °I t ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY e - — fl 1;7 4 `:cin_arr,:n �.--s�_.'''�.��RtiI i,� 11✓+i l v•^8.7 It.I E" k Urban Revitalization,Master ,! :, d 4 u- 0 1 l I t I+ '�N 1 f : µ Development Planning and 4.4 1 „;...,4 "•9R ...11,-, 1 �� 1'11 1'1, r' 191 1'3 C 171; !Ail. M Guidelines a 41 U 11-33 ` i1` +1111 'pia , - .i TEAM MEMBERS f--::...„--:'_`: .. .. �_" �•@__ �. --. , �,+Writ—i INVOLVED r � Bernard Zyscovich In ! ~;: iad Suria Yaffar *4. `,. -'ti `_ �, Grace Perdomo ..t , �� T_ $ Trenton Baughn JR. - �_�` �_ r Thorn Grafton f D arys Avila ;; Manuel del Monte y City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 15 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications WASHINGTON AVENUE STUDY-EVALUATION OF CODE AND MASSING EXERCISES The city is considering options to encourage and promote appropriate,context sensitive, redevelopment and provide better maintenance of historic structures along Washington Avenue.One option being explored is providing property owners the ability to develop additional floor area above the ground floor retail in exchange for improving ground floor uses and restoring historic facades. The goal of this project is to examine the current development rules for the Washington Avenue corridor between sixth Street and Lincoln Road and to see what changes to those rules might incentivize appropriate,context sensitive redevelopment. The study result will be conceptual;the purpose of which is to visualize the impact of additional FAR and height. Issues related to property ownership and aggregation will not be taken into account. Existing land development regulations governing this portion of Washington Avenue provide for a maximum floor area ratio(FAR)of 1.5 for commercial uses and 2.0 if 25% of the floor area is used for residential or hotel uses. The height limit is 50 feet and the parking requirement is significant. To date, other than 555 Washington and 1601 Washington, there has been no redevelopment project on the east side of Washington Avenue that adds residential, hotel or office uses above ground floor retail. If the study recommends an increase in the FAR of any property, it will require a voter referendum;therefore it is essential for the community to be able to visualize the impacts of such changes. , t c . ,#1,.. * I . �. f ! 1 �n•1a1 iL•V' I • ^t1 .;4. 1 4 Y ,l kiiiik lk _ A s 8 L d .rtl , Al -- TIMES SQua*t �/Y ' CAFETF,RU .; if�l l j / / 4 � :. r f iii a t , - »: City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C 0 I C H 16 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Fort Lauderdale,FL SEBASTIAN/ALHAMBRA PARKING LOT FACILITY AND OCEANSIDE KEY FEATURES PARKING LOT FACILITY Master Planning Zyscovich was commissioned to provide Feasibility Studies for three projects which included: visioning a Garage,a Plaza,and a Garage with a Plaza,in addition to Concept Site Plan& Building Programming Designs.The Sebastian/Alhambra Parking Lot Facility and Oceanside Parking Lot Facility Site Evaluation&Analysis projects are to become a catalyst For economic activity. It is therefore critical that they Transit Oriented Development integrate and synergize with the community,supplementing the already vibrant economic activities on Ft. Lauderdale Beach,and are financially sustainable themselves. Feasibility Studies Concept Site Plan As part of the Ft. Lauderdale Master Plan Projects,the Oceanside Parking Lot Facility and Building Design Plaza project will provide an opportunity to amplify the significance of Las Olas Boulevard Parking Garage as a gateway and landmark with a series of integrated public spaces that connect the beach to the Intracoastal Waterway.Our vision is to create a financially sustainable garage which Open Space&Plaza Design contributes to the vibrant beach community. Sustainable Design Project Phasing The creation of an active Oceanside Plaza from the existing surface parking lot adjacent to Local/Regional Transportation the new four-story parking structure will continue the pedestrian entertainment experience Analysis and become a focus point for off beach activities. This space can become a setting for Retail&Economic Market outdoor performances, events, and outdoor markets or simply a place to meet friends. Analysis Drawing upon the sight lines from Las Olas Boulevard,the Oceanside Plaza will amplify the Multiple Stakeholder and connection to the beach through bold,organizational geometry emphasizing the view to Agency Coordination the ocean.The elevator for the parking facility will extend in a vertical tower for viewing the Community Enhancement beach and will be an architecturally significant landmark attraction.Connecting Oceanside Engagement of Exterior Plaza to the beach,the Las Olas Beach Plaza will be designed to reflect Oceanside Plaza Environment and to create a gathering space on the beach to serve as a venue for art in public places Mixed Use and other community related installations Green Roofs The Sebastian/Alhambra Parking Lot, located on the northern edge of the Beach CRA, Observation Deck will provide an opportunity to add parking for the Beach and to create a new park space. CLIENT/CONTACT Redevelopment of the site will also improve the pedestrian experience along Seabreeze City of Ft.Lauderdale Boulevard and Sebastian Street.The six level parking structure could incorporate mixed-use Donald Morris activities,such as beach retail and restaurant space,to further the economic redevelopment 954.828.4517 dmoriss®fortlauderdale.gov of the area as well as provide the needed public restrooms and space for Ocean Rescue Operations.Redevelopment of the site will include exploring opportunities to partner with DURATION developers and landowners. 2012 2012 1111111.111111111111.1111.11.1 ___ ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY - � ---_, –a;a#� Master Planning,Urban Design,Studies and Analyses 2" TEAM MEMBERS 4 .tl�s.r•-_-,— _ INVOLVED B \\ �> . Bernard Zyscovich Trenton Baughn we' ' lie __,, • ' ' ALV440* `` i Thorn Grafton ' ? l' Manuel del Monte 1 , , t.. - 1.,._ _ ___,.„ ,_ . _ ..---tripc.,- , . ___ ,, __ „ 1,,,, ,--iiii ----- --:-.41-,,i. - ,,, ,iii- _ , -. -- a_ _ ..............,,,, , , , . , . vipg . ,..,, . i'. 6- ' , I i \_ 4,44, I City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 17 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C TS Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI/CM CRA CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Miami,FL LITTLE HAITI SOCCER PARK The project included a professional regulation soccer AWARDS Held, a practice field, and a 750-seat grand stand. Other features include a vita course, Little Haiti Cultural Center: 2009 AIA Florida Merit Award tot lot,water play area and a domino park. of Excellence JOSE MARTI PARK GYMNASIUM Zyscovich was hired to design a community KEY FEATURES center and gymnasium facility as a part of Jose Marti Park, located in downtown Miami. Continuing Service Contract The project is a challenging addition due to the small size of the site,which runs underneath Projects an 1-95 overpass, is bisected by a residential Master Planning street and contains major utility hubs feeding Programming the City of Miami and Dade County. As a Space Planning .-- unique solution to the site's size constraints and q Feasibility Studies to `-r` urban setting,Zyscovich elevated the building 1 g I , ...i.... Public Use to span the street, avoiding the underground .__ ii;1;.4- communication cables and water and sewer Renovation/Expansion i.. %- - .__ lines. This innovative move simultaneously Community Involvement 0. LI, I1!, tat, saved the City money and created prominence Community Enhancement & "til Viii 1 for the community center. Redevelopment Design Criteria Packages/ CARIBBEAN MARKETPLACE RENOVATIONS Renovation of the existing Design Guidelines Caribbean Marketplace in Little Haiti. Community Parks LITTLE HAITI CULTURAL CENTER Zyscovich was hired to create a new Little Haiti Sport Facilities&Fields Cultural Campus at the site of the existing Caribbean Marketplace.The new community-use Aquatic Facilities campus maintained the existing Caribbean Marketplace and added two new buildings.The Gymnasiums program includes a 250 seat theater with dance and drama rehearsal halls and a Cultural Concessions Center with an art gallery, arts and crafts workshops, and community meeting rooms.A Offices large open plaza designed to host outdoor community events joins the two new buildings. CLIENT/CONTACT City of Miami CIP/Director Mark Spanioli,PE ,, 305.416.1224 .h S"d.b r~ mspanioli@miamigov.com . d:' fio,' .. ..1,-, ', Former City of Miami CIP/ ■■■ I HDR•/� ,: ..,��"' OIa O.Oluko "Isis 786.255.8858 11E91 •A oduagroup®aol.com + .. . DURATION 1 - r� 2005-0n-going ,, ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Planning,Programming, Studies and Analyses,A/E Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction ARTHUR E. TEELE COMMUNITY CENTER Zyscovich designed the Arthur E. Administration,Design Criteria Teele Community Center as the second phase to the Little Haiti Soccer Park.This building Professional Services houses the City's local Neighborhood Enhancement Team offices,park offices,restrooms, TEAM MEMBERS a community meeting room and a large multi-purpose room.Additionally,the project has INVOLVED covered,exterior space designed as complementary event space.The building is sited to SBernarYd Zyscovich uria affar allow prominence on the street, while planning for a future connection to a third phase Trenton Baughn activities building and providing direct access to the soccer park amenities. Thorn Grafton Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 18 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications GIBSON PARK PLANNING STUDY&DESIGN GUIDELINES Zyscovich was commissioned to prepare a design criteria report for the renovations to Gibson Park.The project includes the renovation of the baseball field and football field,as well as the addition of a new gymnasium,community center, .._.� events pavilion,and concession stand.To fulfill ,, s• , ,�-, + .: ., the program requirement for a new community , ,, ,_ `..,-, ',;.}c W '? yf center,the project includes the adaptive reuse - - ? .• .` '�; I of the existing library building and a new . 9 Y 9 t i" ',0 ., -` , ;� 20,000 SF sports and activities building.The , a _ �., ! �,'' facilities will include a basketball gym,bowling - ,, '-- t 'I` 17 alley,swimming pool,exercise facilities,weight 4 =.... IN--- `�".. �� # I room,and locker rooms. MOORE PARK MASTER PLAN& DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE Zyscovich provided a Conceptual Master Plan and the Design Criteria for Moore Park.This park contains a professional grade tennis center and a football field that is currently P ,- '- undergoing significant upgrades by the Orange Bowl ' ; i, �- Committee. In addition to athletics, this park provides _ `��' •... ' _,i academic programs, daycare, and social events services to - r .., , ' 1 'i the community. Zyscovich conducted a community needs `� ill,�.,�f/; , _.�� study with community groups and the Parks Department and . . x presented a plan to the neighbors and the City that provides i I a new performance space, an outdoor civic plaza with an ` — ,.�`'_BINN9NNN E as r interactive water feature a new daycare,and a new educational r x fit: ==~-11 building that will contain classrooms,art spaces,a recording J am,,, ',. studio,a media room,and administrative offices. CHARLES HADLEY PARK PLANNING STUDY,DESIGN GUIDELINES AND CONCESSION BUILDING UPGRADES As a result of the community meetings facilitated by Zyscovich, the first project to be implemented in Hadley Park is the Concession and Fieldhouse Building, Noted by the community as an immediate need due to the success of the Park's existing sports programs,the building was commissioned to Zyscovich under a continuing services contract.The City requested a modified re-use of the recently completed Community Building at the Little Haiti Soccer Park in an effort to expedite the project.Zyscovich re-programmed and re-designed the building and produced 100%construction documents in 6 weeks. The 4600 sf facility contains public restrooms,equipment storage for the baseball and football programs,a field house for team meetings,offices,and a concession stand to serve the adjacent fields. Featured in the building are a large covered "front porch"to encourage gathering and activity around the concession area,outdoor seating,vitacourse access,and additional landscape for shade and screening from the adjacent residential neighborhood. K..M.. , — cf' ' isO,°, _ r,toad.milira 0 ,71 , ------ - 4-1.7%11' YSEE—"""1" is lit. a ° _ _ , It 'tl— • y 1 '7 t.4^_ ' �. ;X Eil ' i �` v .yr�!' A l,j• i i ._.,,_.... - . City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 19 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT(EDP) Miami-Dade County,FL BICENTENNIAL PARK METROMOVER STATION KEY FEATURES Zyscovich was commissioned to prepare the design criteria package for the design build Continuing Service Contract Projects rehabilitation of the Bicentennial Park Metromover Station.In response to the construction of the new Miami Art Museum and Miami Science Museum,the design included the re- Master Planning orientation of the station's face which connected it to Museum Park.A plaza-like atmosphere Existing Conditions Reports highlights the design and joins the station to Museum Drive. In addition, the landscape Design Criteria Professional design was connected to the landscape design proposed for the museums.To create an LEED Certification Studies iconic wayfinding marker from the museums, colored glass replaced the glass within the Re-roofing Escalator&Elevator existing elevator tower. The work consisted of an existing conditions report, followed by Replacement the design criteria.The scope of the project included replacing the escalator and elevator, ADA and Safety-to-Life new LED light fixtures, painting, and a new signage package that integrated the station Upgrades with the park.The station has become an integral part of the revitalized Bicentennial Park. Expansion Parking&Service Area Modifications Interior Renovations Access _ — Control Improvements Cost/Benefits Analysis Integration to Existing Concept 1 Operational Sites Integration to Urban Environment CLIENT/CONTACT �`► Miami Dade County Elizabeth M.Zabowski 305.375.2824 Concept 2 BIBA@miamidade.gov Fernando Marquez PORT OF MIAMI GUARD HOUSE RE-ROOFING 305.755.7847 Construction Documents for the Re-roofing of the Port of Miami Guard House 1-mar@miamidade.gov NORTH GLADE PARK AND LEISURE LAKES PARK LEED STUDY DURATION 2007-On-going Zyscovich was commissioned to evaluate the Department of Recreation design criteria standards for medium recreational buildings as they relate to sustainable design. The ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY scope of work is to make recommendations on how to achieve LEED Silver Certification Planning,an Pd rogramming, Studies Ana ,A/E of various parks building prototypes, particularly the Medium Recreation Building, both Services,LEED Dlysesesign, generically and as relates to two or three actual park sites.The recommendations include a Interior Design,Construction cost/benefits analysis,and some consideration of alterations needed to the project design Administration,Design Criteria guidelines and project delivery methods. Professional Services TEAM MEMBERS INVOLVED Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar s. , ` `w Thorn Grafton Trenton Baughn ., .. • 's , '�, • Manuel del Monte • • City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z YS C OV I C H 20 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications COCONUT GROVE LIBRARY ADA Access&Balcony Expansion,Parking&Service Area Modifications,Interior Design/Interior Renovation&Access Control Improvements The Coconut Grove Branch of Miami-Dade County's library system is a public facility that is both culturally and historically important to the Coconut Grove neighborhood of Miami.The original small library building dating to the early 1900's (left side of rendering)was expanded in 1963 with a tropical vernacular building. This split-level building had not been updated for accessibility since. Zyscovich has completed a program confirmation /feasibility study for accessibility compliance and expansion.This study was accomplished simultaneously with the schematic design phase. The estimated$2 million project was recently approved to move forward toward implementation. The accessibility compliance includes the reconfiguration of ramps and steps, the addition of an elevator inside the existing building,and the expansion of bathrooms.The work will also provide new HVAC,electrical,plumbing and storm drainage.The necessary expansion of floor space will be accomplished primarily under the existing main roof,by partially enclosing the perimeter veranda,yet without losing the visual effect of the wrap-around overhang.This creative approach will allow valuable floor space to be gained,while improving both building maintenance and security.A simple new entry lobby was required(glass element with signage in the rendering).This transparent,inviting volume ties the two existing buildings together with the entry plaza-and inside provides needed reception space while connecting the split levels. The expansion of the building requires the sensitive addition of new glazing at the main reading room and a new entry foyer,both of which are designed as an expression of today's design style and technology,while preserving the identities of the two original volumes.The interiors will be updated and new library technology added.Trees have been preserved and augmented and a new entry plaza and landscaping will return the building to its cultural significance on an important site in Miami's Coconut Grove community. mss*<" 3d -. 44\ii*. 4 a ' ,toisre,. ` 1 AT .v x- r , M LIM IV a IMb I 1 A t. ��_ , ..rte. c a-.- a ( 14y _ I, *'-" .%1.\,IS"': , , • y •-,• :fro.".. .4°.'.1 '''';-,/,'..; 1::T-.1..''''L-:.. It P 101 r. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 21 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY(SFRTA) GENERAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING CONTRACT Ft. Lauderdale, FL DOWNTOWN FORT LAUDERDALE WAVE MOBILITY HUB KEY FEATURES The Fort Lauderdale Downtown Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative,a collaborative Continuing Service Contract effort between the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority,the Broward MPO, Projects the City of Fort Lauderdale, FDOT and the South Florida Regional Planning Council, Master Planning needs to identify physical and programmatic requirements and opportunities for a mixed- Visioning use transit hub in the heart of downtown Fort Lauderdale. Programming Site Evaluation&Analysis Mobility Hubs have been defined in the MPO's 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Transit-Oriented Development as transit access points with frequent transit service, high development potential, and a critical point for trip generation or transfers within the transit system.As such, the work Zoning Changes will facilitate the preparation of an RFP for redevelopment of the site via a Public-Private Sustainable Design Partnership and will identify privately funded vertical development opportunities with the Project Phasing facilities and infrastructure improvements required to encourage and emphasize connections Multiple Stakeholder and to multiple modes of transportation, including: Agency Coordination Local/Regional Transportation • Streetcar vehicle maintenance and storage for the WAVE Streetcar and an on-street Analysis streetcar station • Transportation Management Association(TMA)trolley bus storage CLIENT/CONTACT South Florida Regional • Potential connections to Central Broward East-West transit extensions and stations Transportation Authority • Potential connections to FEC commuter rail station Lynda Kompelien Westin, • Pedestrian connectivity to BCT Broward Central Terminal for buses AICP 954.942.7245 • Evaluation of public parking needs at the location 954.9 2.72 ta.fl.gov The scope of work includes the review and documentation of existing development DURATION regulations, master plans, transit Initiatives and planning studies; definition of the 2010-0n-going development approval process and the transit program:and the development of conceptual site plans. Conceptual site plans illustrate the accessibility of transit modes, automobile, ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Programming, bicycle and pedestrian traffic in order to evaluate circulation options and reduce conflicts Studies and Analyses,A/E between travel modes. Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction Administration w =, r--.., w -°° r- ..'", _ TEAM MEMBERS ..r BD l .. - � l ,r i, - . ..� 1� r ' l ®} i _ l R _ Bernard INVOLVED c vich ,.. - , _ _ Suria Yaffar . .`. 1$ ? �= :1_ = ! _ ' :1 . Trenton Baughn i : +•sue _ .;:t;5 �, _ _ ���„'�'bi._ Thorn Grafton —� 7.. ., fail—it_ N .° >' i v" ' Manuel del Monte riLliorrr gg l..di °:i Darys Avila 3 �,, -mac_ II. m E `�- -4' i , –,:k-re i, it r 1 ii „Jr-tR' vs,- .: t .:- is u fi ( " 1_ ! t !44,.. , ' ;41‘141 — i r,„ ' ' ' ak -1 •.ti, i t ;:l �. irk. -1 ' /! , i t-- i Ea Iltg :id r: � r .L _- ; .- 7-....1":!i! r t (Ls°' � .. y (y;i. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 22 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications POMPANO BEACH TRI-RAIL STATION KEY FEATURES Zyscovich was commissioned, as a consultant to Kimley-Horn Associates, to prepare Master Planning the architectural design and construction documents for the design-build rehabilitation/ Visioning expansion of the Pompano Beach Tri-Rail Station.The modified prototype project includes Programming new station buildings and an overpass,new platforms to accommodate Tri-Rail and Amtrak LEED Silver train lengths,new canopies for the platform and bus waiting area,and reconfiguration of the Transit Oriented Development parking areas.The project is designed to meet LEED Silver standards and will be submitted Site Evaluation&Analysis for certification.Sustainable strategies incorporated into the project include alternative fuel source parking,a machineroom-less elevator,solar flexlight laminate photovoltaics, LED Solar Flexlight Laminate Photovoltaics lighting,green signage,bicycle lockers,and real time monitoring of energy consumption. The project will receive approximately$5.7 million from the TIGGER III Grant Program Green Signage for solar panels,which will provide for 100%of the energy supply for the facility.Positioned Bicycle Lockers next door to the SFRTA regional offices, the station will become the centerpiece to Tri- Real Time Data Monitoring Rail's updated facilities,showcasing their commitment to a sustainable future. Project Phasing Multiple Stakeholder and 41l ITpp{TBAI : '. _ Agency Coordination LEGEND to 1 •« '' z ;y 1 NEW STATION BUILDING Local/Regional Transportation _ Analysis ' 2 NEW PLATFORM ® • 5 ® Project Fast Tracking to lt. � i,� � 3 KISS AND RIDE .. .los • 4 BUS CANOPY Schedule Accelerate Development � ��°, �;e may.+' r ! SUSTAINABILITYFEATURES CLIENT/CONTACT ''v I ` _,' 5 PHOTOVOLTAIC LAMINATE Kimley-Horn and Associates I 6 BICYCLE LOCKERS Gregory S.Kyle,AICP,Vice © C - ' " —'— _._. President **wove, ©% . - - {' 7 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SOURCE PARKI 1 ��� fi' 954.535.5100 .1 ®-_ --- - - -- 8 CAR POOL VAN PARKING greg.kyle+�kimley horn.com 9 SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATIONAL SIC ilk a.•• a ':: p s . 10 LED LIGHT FIXTURES DURATION ! ..,, ... 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE& 2010-0n-going : t ■■ I MACHINEROOM-LESS ELEVATORS V� �`' 12 SHADED PARKING LOT ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY ...-s'1 -. - i 13 EXISTING WEST PARKING LOT Master Planning,Programming, Studies and Analyses,A/E Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction Administration �� Ty r TEAM MEMBERS _ ® •�� INVOLVED ,' Im Bernard Zyscovich EO i ■� Suria Yaffar _�•— a -4 „._" Trenton Baughn �� ® II ^"� .,. ', +� Thorn Grafton i ---, :� ==mss Darys Avila tf* ` i "'".•.7- 7..—...._ Manuel del Monte 1til : I� -----�_-%1117711 I ais Ii4 11111k1 l'% :gli 14.4.41444 (114 IPPP 'II*441° City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 23 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI DADE COLLEGE CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT: KYRIAKIDES PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS Miami,FL Zyscovich was commissioned to assess the existing condition, prepare a plaza design, KEY FEATURES select paver materials,and improve the plaza sub-base of Kyriakides Plaza at Miami Dade Master Planning& Programming College's Wolfson Campus. The work was needed to correct existing deficiencies and maintenance problems which MDC was experiencing at the plaza.The existing plaza was Space Planning created by closing an existing City of Miami street and paving it with a clay tile paving Mixed-Use system contained by cast in place concrete borders. Urban Design Classrooms&Laboratories Zyscovich arrived at a design solution through a collaborative effort with the client,where design options were explored and the limits of the work were defined.After conducting Faculty&Administrative Offices materials research, Zyscovich and MDC staff selected pavers and colors. The proposed Sustainable Design solution incorporates a paving system suitable for heavy vehicle traffic,which occurs during the annual Miami Book Fair,and provides for suitably placed expansion joints in order to Facility and Feasibility Analysis avoid some of the cracking and chipping attributed to compression in the paver field due Scope and Program Verification to lack of expansion capacity. Preserve Green Spaces and Natural Features The existing pavers had lifted and cracked in many areas,creating ADA and safety issues. Compact Development of the Additionally, they inherently have a poor co-efficient of friction when the plaza is wet. Built Environment The new paving system is more resilient,easier to maintain than the existing system, and Diversity of Uses and Activity resolves the ADA and safety deficiencies. More importantly the design unifies the space Range of Experience between the two existing college buildings and provide a coherent visual field that does Opportunities not resemble an abandoned street. Distinctive,Strong Sense of Place tCLIENT/CONTACT ___ Miami Dade College ' 'Reference to be provided + ' '," f.:,..,2...,___"`�" ''`-; upon request X, -�� ----- - DURATION �r -� �» �'t `:f' - — �`.+.._ _ 2010-2011 = ' 446,` ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY t.- ' Urban Planning&A/E Services '' �= -_ TEAM MEMBERS INVOLVED t=... - ,, . , a ,—- ; Bernard Zyscovich yam`. , ; l►►4•4�+rit. - - is Sur' Ya ar ,' _'_,-_,- - r_,_\, '''N■, _ Thorn Grafton 'i;•°" �, �r��-. Manuel del Monte el-i!' Wit,,, ' yL i1- '"441C-rIt""I'° - Aid1P. . -..v - / ';:r Y a Vf a'/v / I Kyriakides Plaza Design City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 24 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH URBAN REGULATIONS West Palm Beach,FL Despite its quirky main street and a successful mixed-use shopping center, West Palm AWARDS Beach's traditional downtown had failed to thrive.Competing retail,a weak office district, Florida American Planning Association Award of poor connections to surrounding neighborhoods,a surplus of vacant land,and a code which Excellence,2008 did not work well resulted in a fragmented and under-performing downtown. Zyscovich worked with Lambert Advisory and a City appointed Advisory Board to investigate the KEY FEATURES new Vision for n' redevelopment. Urban,Large-Scale.Multi- ma�or planning potentials and to create a ne son or the downtown's op block District Redevelopment The most significant outcomes included: Long Range Fiscal Plan • Linking the two main retail centers with a new business district and creating Extensive Community development incentives to attract Class A office uses Engagement,Public Outreach • Adopting a new zoning code and land use plan based on 13 new neighborhood &Educational Campaigns sub-districts with distinctive characteristics Future Land Use Map • Designing zoning parameters for a range of lot sizes and street types Zoning:Undid Form-based • Developing the zoning mechanism to return a defunct main street into a Zoning Code neighborhood shopping corridor TIF or Innovative Monetary • Enabling adaptive reuse of an industrial district for arts,retail,and residential uses Leveraging Policy Recommendations recommendations and new zonin provisions for the Northwest Y The Master Plan includes zoning p neighborhood,a historic African American neighborhood with many examples of Florida Waterfront Planning and Focus vernacular architecture.The recommendations and new regulations were focused on the on Downtown preservation of the neighborhood for single family uses in the interior and to encourage Visioning Process&Master Plannin commercial and multi-family on the perimeter streets.This was accomplished through g the preservation of height limits, specific location-based use criteria, recommendations Land Development Regulations for street extensions to improve connectivity,the development of parks and cultural uses, Market Study and Graphic and the protection of area churches through special parking provisions. Depictions of Plans Created New Districts Based on Distinct Characteristics Created New Land Development Regulations to Mr' Support District Initiatives•3,, a t '' Developed with the d ° ' '' '3 -.. Community for Widespread ' '- ''' _ - ;I Support ;A:, f+,, co x W� a$,rr x Designed Development 1'1.: r `" Incentives to Encourage a New : ., . Business District Northwest District ,,,. a, n ;? Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIDTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN AND ZONING Miami, FL Midtown Miami,likely one of the largest urban infill development projects in the country, AWARDS encompasses a 56-acre site formerly used by the Port of Miami as a storage facility for AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award shipping containers. Identified by Zyscovich as a potential mixed-use district in an early plan for the City of Miami, the firm identified which blocks should contain retail, which APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study commercial/entertainment and which residential. Developers and Builder's As the site's master planners and master architects, the team partnered with the City of Alliance Community Advancement Awards Real Miami's planning department to examine the zoning and land use and to change the land Urbanism Visionary Award use from Industrial to Restricted Commercial.Zyscovich then created two Special District Overlays and Design Guidelines to regulate building form,parking,open space,and uses KEY FEATURES Focus on Downtown organized around a hierarchy of different streets. Master Planning From that point,the neighborhoods within Midtown were further refined.Along the western Land Use/Market Study edge of the site is residential over big box and regional retail. The requirements for the Zoning or Design Guidelines/ residential buildings include service-oriented ground floor retail and internal parking hidden , Regulations From the street to further enhance the pedestrian-friendly plan.The northeast portion of Multi-block District the site, known as the Entertainment Block, is planned as an intensely commercial zone Redevelopment created for use by the entire neighborhood and will provide continuous pedestrian activity Created Zoning Overlay and within, and along, its northern edge which abuts the Miami Design District. It includes Design Guidelines two office/showroom buildings with ground floor retail, dining, and shopping that are Long term Visioning separated by a one-acre park,as well as a condominium hotel with abundant corner uses Market Based Solutions and a community theater which will offer cultural activities. Site Evaluation&Analysis 1> Transit-Oriented Development " t ' ,7.} --- Sustainable Design r Multiple Stakeholder and • :,. _ !I Agency Coordination I • I .`f 4 `' .I 1s+,.a Redevelopment&Infill "' _ - Development in Urbanized 1 I ( r Y ?� y .,1 Area Vertically Integrated Mixed- r � ' '' Uses Including Office, f► M c. Little Haiti Cultural Center Residential and Big Box Retail "o s - �'"e" �s Street Design - .— . ..,,,,,, Recreation and Open Space Midtown Retail and Residential Street Character ,� .L - CLIENT/CONTACT F, f SamDevelop ,_� •'=-'====_th ---. ) Deborah Samuel `�: : I ,--_-7--_______ �• 305.757.0001 f deborah @sam develop.com f „ � '^ .' DURATION 'w'`r�---..-"ii- i y,� , ,. 2004-2007 F-"”` �' ; ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY i� '�-- ="'" ---~ ja Master Planning,Programming, ',4:_--.1':7- '"Z-:y. � ' -I. fj , - - _, ,,,e4, Architecture,Feasibility Studies a` ,�" r,-.r •.!�. �JAt► i. } r.. � -� s v„t5 L' _ I Y , 1F,- _ u r;.i TEAM MEMBERS . _ _ v.;, t4' "° f •4i f `E� INVOLVED ,: .i°' i .,, it ay_m_LL.1 ___ _, Bernard Zyscovich r4. `a. , ,-..__ _ -._--".._, ,_.,. ...," Suria Yaffar R� `� .... - Grace Perdomo f —Th.i —ir- i ii i- —i— Trent Baughn Midtown Master Plan Proposed Special Districts Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 26 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & UPDATE Miami Beach,FL In the early 1990s,South Miami Beach was in desperate need of investment AWARDS -' APA Florida Gold Coast and creativity.What began as negotiations between a grassroots �t� community group seeking to preserve a small group of 'fit q Urban Design Outstanding y= -' /,'� ••.� l Urban Design Study 1950s hotels and the City's Mayor who wanted to • --'.- /`• w''' y y �..... .. APA Florida Gold Coast develop a convention hotel on publicly owned �'. ,, ' Section 2001 Planning Award land,launched this small district into one of .!.�'"� for Outstanding Architectural more popular tourist markets in the '. kLllt Project,Convention Center the o e pop a 1 �� i -►.' Hotel Complex 16th Street world. As part of the team developing Lh * the hotel project, Zyscovich prepared -- "''�� :-:,:t.4�—=�"`'"" s` APA Florida Gold Coast P ! y P P ' j� }'- Section 2001 Planning Award the districts master plan and CRA plan. 'r;, i��„';.--”' – ,,-,->)L,J1 ti� for Outstanding Historical '∎ `" it, 11 ,1,_ r' ^�i Renovation Project,St.Moritz I r ` AIA Miami 1999 Honor Award r ,y '' -TrT „ of Excellence in Urban Design Master Plan Drawing for it . 1. the Convention Center =Lc-4• t FAPA Gold Coast Section District k__--1 - ^ 2001 Planning Award for j� Outstanding Historical Renovation Project ° APA 2001 Planning Award 0/0 ', IS r for Outstanding Architectural •0 o , 1 ■ _ • Project • ' KEY FEATURES III r "i I __. Identified Improvements as Catalysts for Redevelopment '-' - - '''' ' '4' ' 0 0 '• 0 i ' : 1111 j '-"�"" a;; — 14`' '11.-. Established the Mechanism i..a� . If Lf�WRS oil. 1 V, "'' _ -' to Fund these Improvements a - Acanim11= 4` .;, • through the CRA• wt► Public Private Partnership 1' Master Planning&Urban Design Condition of South Beach Convention Center District before Construction Site Planning,Platting,Urban Block Creation.Zoning& Regulations l; 0 Land Use Planning 40 Economic Redevelopment g..._ Revenue Generation ii ` > cj Public and Private Financing !tall irr'+t smears 1, 4 . . ,� Attracting and Securing I -rat ' _ ,.. Developers ft.rr ■ n...-w ! r' n ' v-ir > a r- ' 1 1 fit'.►; a • Development Phasing ■w* • T* 1 y :cT In ■irlit I; tom— wc% �0° ,. 1 Programming wiz. !a ,. - r � ■. t s� I , a;Q Y a .- ■ ■ }• Iconic Design 'H i i ' Destination Place Making � i, Multiple Stakeholder,Agency, `r! i •1 , :r.'". Jurisdictional Consensus&,Alki �. •{ Approvals ,;44tl4 i! Imo•' Mixed-Use Development ___,....... ._71.. ..,____._ , till Trade&Tourism Frk. +I ; Waterfront Development After Construction Images:Loews Hotel Complex,Anchor Shops and 16th Street City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 27 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications Ten years later,Zyscovich was hired to update the master plan.These three efforts together Multimodal.TOD&Parking played a major role in revitalizing South Beach with the following outcomes: Planning and Design Retail&Commercial • Construction of the Loews Hotel convention center complex and specifically design Hotels&Restaurants of the St. Moritz Hotel and Anchor Shops with structured parking Exhibit&Conference Space • Design of the 16th Street roadway extension to connect with the convention hotel Revitalization of the eastern end of Lincoln Road Business Service Center • Civic&Open Green Spaces • Design and construction of the Lincoln Cinema to anchor the western end of p p Lincoln Road Pedestrian Connectivity& • A renewed cultural campus including a Regional Library, Ballet Center, and Wayfinding renovated art museum Sustainability/LEED Planning • Master plan for soundscape park framed by an expanded New World Symphony &Design building and Wallcast Contextually Appropriate Design CLIENT/CONTACT City of Miami Beach/Miami ! Beach CRA p, •- a, NY, +Y± " Former Red evelopment __ Coordinator a . .�„�`" 0 ' Kent Bonde" ' Moo SPACES a `Reference to be provided ••s,)G. maa upon request us A; =.., __ ..o�I w DURATION 0 11 ;,, , 1 av.4.0_ .'u� . -1 ♦...,,.soa••vy°i,,„ _ Master Plan:1993 t° • � `` Plan Update:2003 _i.-._,_ ° � ' �, CONVENTION CENTER �` ill:r_4,, ,,,.: ; P \ ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY "Al '. a14,-e Urban Design,Visioning, „�� Master Planning, "�l�r 44E4'44.. .. a' Programming,Community and ►,1-..,+ i Stakeholder Outreach r, '1 TEAM MEMBERS , r �• q INVOLVED _ . • - __ Zyscovich WASHINGTON _, _ - ' F�, .. •- a >.• E-xa Suria Yaffar Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan Update Trent Baughn ' pit ;* s' . 1f.:#4") tk, . - , .‘ .-. .. ., ,I ea I . -1- - ' IF 0 1 tk v. ' • ,..'. _ '‘<b I , . jr�^' tea `_ New World Symphony Wallcast Lincoln Road Pedestrian Mall •t , .t- tv Ins 1.-.°..•. - > .0004 it�r Lincoln Cinema Miami City Ballet by Arquitectonica City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 28 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications NEW ORLEANS NEIGHBORHOOD (POST KATRINA) REBUILDING PLAN New Orleans,LA Zyscovich was commissioned by the City Council of the City of New Orleans as part KEY FEATURES of Lambert Advisory's design team to prepare a reconstruction plan for five of 49 Community Redevelopment neighborhoods adjacent to the French Quarter. The three primary goals of the plan are Long Range Fiscal Plan to prioritize a broad range of community projects among historically divided neighborhoods, Extensive Community return a sense of normalcy as quickly as possible, and to create a plan that addresses the Engagement,Public Outreach overall deterioration which pre-existed Katrina.The final plan will be the basis for the receipt &Educational Campaigns of Federal funding and was a result of an intensive public involvement effort.of Process I Audit of Land Use and The final plan included the following elements: Programs Highest and Best Use Analysis • Methodologies for enhancing local neighborhood pride while transcending the Future Land Use Map differences to achieve shared opportunities • Identifying key corridors between neighborhoods to create a place where the Capital Projects and/or Programs Priorities List communities can come together for new social and commercial use • Creating networks that tie into the tourist economy Implementation Program • Creating a dialogue with the community through public meetings and committees TIF or Innovative Monetary • Leveraging Communication strategies Historic Preservation Urban,Large-Scale,Multi- block District Redevelopment Community-based Plans Land Use/Market Study Neighborhood Planning Created an Implementation s '''.7''.:-.."'7,' 7 r Strategy with Funding Priorities• 5T.BEF.NARO �,,,yy`��t w _'� ;: _ -• , Public and Private Financing ARE.;PRQ..-cri -:.. P» a•'` k-ii ..- •• @ r'�>��A lrx � _ Land Use Planning V4 i " _'�" "r= � , I i; Recommendations it�'.'.J . a a t ;; Redevelopment Plan Approval ;�,to', �-' ! 1 Process - Strategic and Action Plans ,r Proposed view of Moss Street in the Fauborg St.John neighborhood; <!Y Proposed View of a Key Corridor Along 1-10/Claiborne Corridor Strategies for New Residential - NEIGHBORHOODS REBUILDING PLAN Development and Housing ST BERNARD AREA IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY MATRIX Assistance L.. �� , CLIENT/CONTACT ��� '� Lambert Advisory,LLC r� �'' Paul Lambert s'x"t ' ,•,, 1 ,.-:! 305.860.3715 wwT " ` plambert®lambertadvisory.com `Ow)�t • • 015.600.000 ;` landsape rehab t replao•mant_ DURATION • 0600.000 - ROWS neutral grounds 20 06-20 06 Reopen Methodist Elderly Cam facility-improve open plaza on St. • • • __ Bemard Ave. Neighborhoods Aerial Subtotal:Capital Projects St 6,200,000 ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Mid Tenn Plan Planning,Urban Add marked bicycle lanes on key 2 • • 530 000 roadways where space permits Design,V i s i o n i n g Install 1-610 Acoustical buffering 2 • • 52 000 000 �i-:fir; - - t" Rehabilitate Union Baptist Theological Seminary or new use for 2 TEAM MEMBERS PmPertY .:M.'s * 4e. Subtotal:Capital Projects _ 52,030.000 INVOLVED iv.' :� tiouaina Initiatives and Other Polk.% Bernard Zyscovich C'•; .. ,' - Reinforce small scale commercial R .,ey %.*:`-, 'b 1 - - scones from St.Bernard housing 2 Suria Yaffar i u t r" \i , ment � ��- �w enn Plan Grace Perdomo rtal Projects �• SUPtOtal:Capital Projects I I Trenton Baughn Thorn Grafton Proposed"Heart of 7th Ward' Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 29 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications ALL ABOARD FLORIDA Miami/Fort Lauderdale/West Palm Beach/Orlando, FL Zyscovich Architects,in association with Skidmore,Owings&Merrill(SOM),are serving KEY FEATURES as co-architects of record for this privately owned,operated and maintained passenger rail Local/Regional Transportation system in the United States.When completed, it will become of the highest speed train Analysis routes in the country. Existing Conditions Report Multiple Stakeholder and Elevating the railroad tracks 50 feet into the air along the dense,linear site in the core of Agency Coordination downtown Miami will allow traffic to flow freely underneath.The elevated tracks will also Programming create room for two layers of valuable,glass-encased retail space at the street level,where Site Evaluation&Analysis pedestrians pass by. Lightweight perforated panels will lie intermediately in the open webs Master Planning of the traversing V-shaped exoskeleton that enclose the railroad tracks and will allow for Design Criteria Package glimpses of the moving train.The entire project will feel industrial,yet will be transparent and airy. Project Phasing Sustainable Design The scope of work includes the support services necessary for the operation and safety Streetscape Improvements of the high-speed rail system, including boarding platforms, stairs, elevators, escalators, Transit-Oriented Development walkways,waiting areas,ticket and information booths,luggage handlin areas,restrooms,� 9 handling , (TO D) utility rooms, station advertising displays, concessions, restaurants, lounges and other service-related businesses that will be open to passengers and nearby residents. Included CLIENT/CONTACT All Aboard Florida the long-term master plan are parking structures and rental car facilities,bikeways,pocket Eric Claussen parks,community gardens,playgrounds,power substations,and other uses necessary for 305.520.2115 the operation,maintenance,and future growth of the All Aboard Florida intermodal transit Eric.Claussen@allaboardflorida. oriented development. com DURATION 2013-2016 ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY ..,° Master Planning,Visioning, Entitlements,Programming,11). w-::'- ' ,-• lir Itr- -, Re Zoning,Site Evaluation .Y € &Analysis,Architectural& • - - Interior Design,Phasing, T Sustainable Design e "� .;+ . f ,, r ( :' �,-``' ,r. ► TEAM MEMBERS - INVOLVED • .,tt latipt,' •• • - , Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar Grace Perdomo Trenton Baughn ~ .� Thorn Grafton Manuel del Monte _ M Darys Avila ;111 i ` ti j *0 lit ,,/! ►; d:"..74 I'•:''3'.,'+':4 144 :ji, .44 ,,"„lipt.4!-„ili .4":4410.4t, t,7..,,0 ..‘ich :,!' 'C'V r _ ,, .0,---- --- . . . ..., .....8t. .t. ,,,: , „,„„),,, ,,,,,,,,,,..1,00,- _. , , ,,, „4_. ,,,..:, ..,....„,....,,,,_ %---.> , __. \,. . _ ,„.., , „,. . , tit.,, City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 30 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI OMNI AREA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & UPDATE Miami,FL Zyscovich was hired by the City of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency to update KEY FEATURES the Omni neighborhood redevelopment plan.This included a thorough analysis of existing Community Redevelopment infrastructure,urban form,economics,and housing to form design recommendations and Long Range Fiscal Plan redevelopment opportunities. Community Engagement Public Outreach&Educational In addition to the creation of a redevelopment plan report,Zyscovich produced an analysis Campaigns of existing conditions. The report outlines over 20 strategies and projects to promote a Visioning Process and Master cohesive redevelopment plan for the area. Planning The plan was updated in 2009 and adopted by the Miami Dade County Commission in Audit of Land Use and Programs January of 2010. Highest and Best Use Analysis Market Study&Future Land Use Map Zoning&Design Guidelines/ Regulations to Protect Neighborhoods and Special Areas I t j I_._.,,J Overall Vision Diagram Capital Projects and/or _ —— 1. Improved Programs Priorities List ___-- ..-4(1� 11 A+I 1�t�'11:11`'1 L- Connectivity ::::I.0111111111, .. 1 , TIF,Innovative Monetary ' �'`, 2. Omni Mall Leveraging.Alternative L ! t? g !'�l rji `� Redevelopment Funding&Public Private 3. Miami Herald Financing 1 S and Surrounding Facilitated Financial Plan J a ;r m 'I Properties Attracting and Securing I .t ➢ ;y�`u Redevelopment Developers 14 o ��<> ""��" 4 � 4. Performing Arts I ,_ ;_.r.; •6 .; Waterfront Planning � Center iiiiii:: .:1 ‘ _ - i . I + � (� — Slum&Blight Analysis and Aro.111,.. `.— 5. Area Capture Parking Finding of Necessity r 1 'I i ! -- Llo1 i i 6. Media/Entertainment ,� M�- #7.111•101— Service Delivery(Public Safety --� t r-__.=o• �. District 1 i �� ,� and Utilities) Y �J �' J �y ��r " i f; + " 7. Baywalk i 1. •.- Growth Management and �> �� ► 11 ,' 8. Streetscapes Smart Growth Initiatives !I v ' I ' -- 1 f 1 ( E �j 9. Historic Preservation Urban&Environmental •- '��,% �� i) Standards I r, • :1� ,J) u. '_ 10. Neighborhood ti o � 1I•� /..?%.„: Greenspace CLIENT/CONTACT O O i e,, 11. Variety of Housing Omni Redevelopment District CRA 12. Neighborhood School Frank Rollason(retired) �f - i , 305.299.7300 1.;-':.* I j x .• )•' \ DURATION 1!"...,,o E, !' m'tiat 'V ',V‘,!1. 2004-2007 �lIl: Adopted:2009 ') I ~° \ '%,' �,'�,, Amended City Commission: - , 2010 �' �� '���°A�-° ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY . ' „+ Master Planning,Streetcape r '.4','R:91 Rq T �� '� ", e� ',, Design.Programming, =f� �•4iNict,,,`' �; ,.. .7 �` % h- W TEAM MEMBERS �..,, y - - R '',--low-- �' , .,,, '�" f, INVOLVED j'r Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar Trent Baughn Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 31 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications PLAN Z FOR MIAMI Miami,FL Architect and cycling enthusiast Bernard Zyscovich has a plan to turn Miami's Rickenbacker KEY FEATURES Causeway into a"scenic road through a park."The idea originated after the cycling death Feasibility Study of Aaron Cohen along this same stretch of roadway.The proposed plan, known in social Site Evaluation&Analysis media circles as#PlanZforMiami,complies with the Miami-Dade Parks, Recreation and Programming Open Space Master Plan and was approved by the Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Urban Fabric Revitalization Organization's Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Streetscape Improvements By downgrading the functional classification of Rickenbacker Causeway to enable an Human Scale alternate roadway design standard, i.e. Principle Arterial to Minor Arterial, a new design Design Standard strategy for the causeway could be implemented.Zyscovich's plan would formally convert Implementation Rickenbacker Causeway into Rickenbacker Park. One of three vehicular lanes would be Local Transportation Analysis removed,providing two vehicular lanes in each direction From the mainland to the entrance Existing Conditions Report to the Village of Key Biscayne.The newly liberated space would be used to expand bicycle Multiple Stakeholder and and pedestrian facilities.Landscaped medians planted with shade trees and native species Agency Coordination would separate vehicle lanes from bike and pedestrian paths. Design Criteria Package Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) CLIENT/CONTACT -,=•''' Zyscovich Architects-ProBono :'s,'+= Bernard Zyscovich a Gr 305.372.5222 d r," bernard@zyscovich.corn , DURATION • s: .;+'/ ■ 4 2012-On-going - .r. 1 t ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY p Visioning,Urban Design, Current View $ Feasibility Studies and Planning . TEAM MEMBERS G-- > INVOLVED if Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar 4, I. ++° .` Grace Perdomo Trenton Baughn Thorn Grafton IA f� 4 Darys Avila _. `d4.- . ,„i(fti,,,. , .y r" Ali. A, t _ - e/';.J• : 1r . f msµ _ - a Rendering of After View City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 32 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DOWNTOWN HOLLYWOOD (YOUNG CIRCLE) CRA MASTER PLAN & UPDATE Hollywood,FL Amidst a burgeoning real estate boom,the City of Hollywood found itself unequipped to KEY FEATURES negotiate development agreements with three different downtown developers for lack of a Community Redevelopment clear vision and plan.While the City was designing a new Arts Park in the impressive 900 foot Long Range Fiscal Plan diameter Historic Young Circle traffic circle,no plan existed for the buildings surrounding Community Engagement the park,the streetscape,the transit line or the historic retail corridor.The ensuing vision Public Outreach&Educational provided a more bold downtown which used the park as its focal point to synthesize and Campaigns enhance energies between the retail areas across the street and those within the Circle.New Visioning Process and Master buildings must follow the curve of the Circle to frame the space and concentrate height Planning along the main street,away from the adjacent residential neighborhoods.Additional zoning Audit of Land Use and recommendations for the commercial corridors included increased height and density Programs within a half mile radius of the downtown.Six years later in 2009,the City hired our firm to Highest and Best Use Analysis translate the plan into a zoning code and update the plan.Working in conjunction with our Future Land Use Map economist to assess the economic situation and identify and redevelopment opportunities, Zoning or Design Guidelines/ we developed goals and objectives which enable the City,property owners,and residents Regulations to make informed strategic decisions about future development and public improvements. Capital Projects and/or Programs Priorities List In addition to numerous stakeholder workshops and community presentations,the revised TIF or Innovative Monetary master plan resulted in the following outcomes: Leveraging • Incentives for historic preservation and infill development. Policy Recommendations • Historic and Conservation Districts to protect the existing character. Focus on Downtown • Sites and programs for potential public/private partnerships and pilot projects. Land Development Regulations • Zoning Regulations and Standards to reinforce district character and sense of place. Land Use/Market Study Multi-block District Redevelopment : - °' - Graphic Depictions of Plans r --5'71,75 ,;4. �: -msµ ' _ Community Involvement !•- $ ----•-•,,,.. Roadway Improvements Public Realm Improvements y' ,. -4 Parking Strategies �= �:� .:: CRA Zone y' `: Arts and Cultural Uses -- ' Before Pedestrian Connectivity Coastal Community CLIENT/CONTACT City of Hollywood CRA r" .-.. ,--r.<s-- ■ _ �.- ....., Jaye Epstein .,„, 954.921.3471 jepstein@hollywoodfl.org - ` _ .-75111,' DURATION _ P `f -"--- 2008-2010 After ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Urban Design,Studies and Analyses ❑ Mixed Use R etail Core MI Dixie Highway II. Young Circle TEAM MEMBERS III North Downtown ■ North Parkside Ostict/Mixed-us• ® Federal Highway INVOLVED 1 District - -- - - - - '- ] ❑ Golf ❑ Transition to Lakes Bernard Zyscovich • i! ■ ,_y- _' — -- o.T -— i — Suria Yaffar Master Plan Trent Baughn Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 33 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T EC TS • Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications HOLLYWOOD BEACH CRA VISION AND ZONING MASTER PLAN Hollywood,FL Zyscovich created a new Vision and Zoning Master Plan for the Hollywood Beach CRA AWARDS by focusing on strategies to preserve its historic buildings, finding solutions for FEMA's AIA Florida 2007,Unbuilt Merit Award building requirements, upgrading the quality of the public realm, and supporting new development which is compatible with the existing building fabric. KEY FEATURES Community Redevelopment The plan established the Boardwalk as the premiere bicycling destination in Florida; Long Range Fiscal Plan created a new historic district, recommended a multi-use trail link at Hollywood Beach Community Engagement, Boulevard;created a Beach Walk and Park in South Central Beach;created a Boardwalk Public Outreach&Educational along the Intracoastal Waterway;and implemented environmentally friendly streetscape. Campaigns It also included a new zoning code to incorporate the realities of the development climate, Visioning Process the limitations of the parcels,and flood zone requirements,as well as a"green framework" Audit of Land Use and with potential funding sources for nature-based recreation. Programs Highest and Best Use Analysis Future Land Use Map `* 1 Capital Projects and/or ,� 1 Programs Priorities List 3 xr,� y�; k.,At " i g TIF or Innovative Monetary •t€i�i�ts. . � 50 Max Haight y y Leveraging preserves views fr• �+.� 00...r+W'^'.''. ��, �- existing buildings • er,* 4.4., - Waterfront Planning A� ,-- Urban,Large-Scale, u∎. . 11: Multi-block District + ' , -11, Redevelopment 3' I Site Planning,Platting,Urban - 1 I Block Creation,Zoning& Landscape buffer protects\ : I '� � Regulations public character of beach • _s 1 and provides beach acme \ i,r. a : Development Phasing for oceanfront properties w,«r ,r.., ...a I \ Destination Place Making Multimodal,TOD&Parking Boardwalk Extensiott � ; •3: 1 Planning and Design Beach.wi \ t, Transit Loo. t 1 Pedestrian Connectivity& \ .. ` \ —i I Wayfinding Proposed Massing I Historic Preservation Maintain side setbacks to protect views to I f beach and public access for all residents and visitors 4 CONTACT CLIENT i o a, Si`. City of Hollywood CRA `�, 5 l: i1 Jaye Epstein,Director• ,AI' I I III hill I" 954.921.3471 XX S° t °`" ',lk —�' jepstein®hollywoodfl.org l ip s DURATION fi/i..; t- i'',`+ ice— .-:—: 2005 2007 il T ' ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY *g i 11;;;;;•".• Master Planning,Zoning& "' s Urban Design 1.i 0.r r. t t' _ a01" :m t w TEAM MEMBERS i- 'a �. r INVOLVED Bernard Zyscovich - a .�► Suria Yaffar Trenton Baughn ihk, +•'�"' r 11, Thorn Grafton _�_— Manuel del Monte Boardwalk Circulation Plan City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 34 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications PERSONNEL Zyscovich is a large planning and architecture firm, employing over 90 1 "« ►= ''`" ` professionals with vast experience and technical expertise.The planners,urban „ - designers and architects proposed for this project have extensive experience ..- !'. k : r' .,.rte. .•�...i� _ ...: "_. in visioning, urban design, master plan updates, land use redevelopment improvements, economic development and rehabilitation, contemporary -. ' a+ * , `k .,.� planning codes,and capital project planning,prioritization and implementation, ;i", as well as regulating plans for multi-modal transportation and storm water �• •+• z infrastructure for municipalities throughout the country.This team has worked � . t. together on a number of similar projects, the majority of which have been _ 9 P J 1 Y implemented.Their expertise includes community workshops,education and f_ w engagement, and presenting reports and information to elected officials, = ;" • stakeholders and the community. Our vast experience in both private and public sector planning and the L 4 ___=-=s` importance of market feasibility help to ensure that our plans can be realized. , i .;, � :- • For over 37 years, our firm has developed creative solutions to stimulate and Y.-� implement high quality redevelopment while protecting neighborhoods. We Y' :' have been recognized for this level of dedication and expertise in planning by y. -4- the American Planning Association and the American Institute of Architects ►: _ • and will bring this energy to the City of Miami Beach. The staff assigned will w-' 4, . " +' be with the projects from their inception through their successful completion. v_. Additional staff can and will be assigned as necessary to meet the budget, schedule and objectives of the projects.The following pages contain resumes Midtown Miami:Existing Conditions. for our key personnel as follows: Implementation(2007)&Proposed Build-out BERNARD ZYSCOVICH, FAIA, Principal-in-Charge, will have overall responsibility and accountability for the performance of the entire Zyscovich team, including any required sub-consultants,which will be selected based on a specific project's scop with approval by the City of Miami Beach. He will ensure that the team is staffed correctly and adequately. SURIA YAFFAR,ASSOC.AIA, LEED AP, Principal and Director of Design,will help lead the urban design effort to successfully achieve the vision and design requirements. GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA,Project Manager and Sr.Urban Designer,will be responsible for the management of the project and the day-to-day communication between all team members. TRENTON BAUGHN,RA,AICP,LEED AP,Director of Urban Design,will work closely with the Project Manager to provide planning services involving visioning, redevelopment, design guideline/code development, community engagement and zoning analysis. THORN GRAFTON,AIA, LEED AP, Historic Preservation Architect and Director of Sustainable Initiatives, will bring his knowledge and expertise in the areas of historic preservation and sustainable design to the projects. MANUEL DEL MONTE,Sr. Urban Designer,will provide support for the urban design services involving visioning, programming,conceptual design,design guideline development and zoning analysis. DARYS AVILA,Jr.Urban Designer and Graphics Specialist,will serve as support staff and will create graphic diagrams. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 35 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Zyscovich, Inc. Master Planning, Programming, I /\ V 1( 6 EAR i-i Studies, LEED Design,Urban Design,Sustainable Design,Urban & Historic Preservation 1 Bernard Zyscovich,FAIA Principal-in-Charge Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA,LEED AP Director of Design Grace Perdomo,Assoc.AIA Project Manager;Sr. Urban Designer Trent Baughn AICP,LEED AP Director of Urban Design Manuel del Monte Sr. Urban Designer Thorn Grafton,AIA,LEED AP Director of Sustainable Initiatives Darys Avila Jr.Urban Designer SUBCONSULTANTS As Necessary City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 36 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications BERNARD ZYSCOVICH, FAIA Principal-in-Charge Bernard Zyscovich is the founder of Zyscovich Architects and serves as its Managing EDUCATION Principal. With over 40 years experience, he has led creative teams on a wide range of Bachelor of Architecture Pratt Institute 1971 projects from the urban planning of major U.S.cities to the architectural design of high-rise residential, mixed-use, retail, and commercial buildings. As the visionary on many high- Special Study in Urban Design Universita'Di Architettura profile projects, Bernard draws upon his extensive work with multiple stakeholders and Venice,Italy 1969 broad-based public input to create implementable redevelopment plans that are embraced by the community,stakeholders,developers and elected officials. REGISTRATIONS Registered Architect in: Florida#AR0007410 Bernard brings to each of the firm's projects an instinctive understanding of architectural context and the connection to the surrounding environment as a result of his years analyzing New York#030993-1 the massing,forms and features of the urban fabric.This holistic approach allows our projects New Jersey#21A101705600 to enjoy a continuity with the essential aspects of the environment while establishing a Pennsylvania#RA403495 new,integrated expression of that uniqueness of the place. North Carolina#11384 RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Georgia#RA012504 • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract Tennessee#103991 • Downtown Fort Lauderdale Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative Illinois#1.018009 • City of Miami/City of Miami CRA Continuing Service Contract NCARB Certification#26130 • Miami-Dade County Architectural Services(EDP)Continuing Service Contract • South Florida Regional Transit Authority(SFRTA)Continuing Service Contract PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Miami Dade College Continuing Service Contract Fellow of the American • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update Institute of Architects(FAIA) • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning Member of the American • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan& Update Planning Association(APA) • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Member of the Urban Land • All Aboard Florida Master Planning and Station/TOD Design Institute • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan& Update PUBLICATIONS/ • Plan Z for Miami SPEAKING • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update ENGAGEMENTS • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Getting Real About Insbani • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning Institutee,, Urban Land 2008 • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan Numerous Publications in • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan National Journals including Architectural Digest,Interior ':::":,7":! a k w _ . , Design and Architecture,Urban x r ., x 't ,i 0 S e •,•, ai Land Magazine and Multifamily s a ''�'1,r-1 ` ' # W �. _ Housing '_1 ,,?, r ; ,:I r . , ULI YLG Author Series: A �1 " - r' Conversation with Bernard Zyscovich about Real Qf..,•'-' r} •. -, lo , Urbanism,New York,NY a Y .� Meeting of the Minds A ti�YJ .a�;«� a 7-: __:____ Sustainable Cities Leadership ummit:P anning and Keeping G_ ,, "s s`,"'- .. Personality in Place,New York, n i a , 1 .r.x -. % -i: , � �n,'i 14.." •s NY ,1 •Club..S•uare�»Entertainment�District .a}�., American Institute of 2 _ I .; ' t= I _ I. . Architects'Large Firm ; ,� ,�;_.. ,, Roundtable,Real Urbanism,iii' ,- P Philadel hia,PA .' Market Square tLafayetteA .. ..1 � :I 1 -- '''R •' ,, Universita Frederico Segundo, • ,,\ N',, x 1 1 1 1 t ;_ , - - i,' ' , -- ._ . - . Theories of Design and Urbanism,Naples,Italy Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Pillars of the Industry National Assn.of Home Builders, City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYSCOVICH 37 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S 1 Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications SURIA YAFFAR,ASSOC.AIA, LEED AP Principal;Director of Design Suria Yaffar is a firm principal and the Director of Design.Suria has worked on a variety of EDUCATION planning,urban design and architectural projects for public and private clients throughout Master of Architecture Princeton University 1990 the United States. She is experienced in all phases of the planning process including community outreach,consensus building,strategic planning and urban design,as well as all Bachelor of Architecture University of Miami 1987 phases of land development.Suria collaborates with Bernard Zyscovich on the firm's most significant commissions.Suria has served on regional ULI Advisory boards and conducted REGISTRATIONS university lectures on master planning and architecture and her work has been published LEED Accredited Professional in the ACSA Journal. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Associate Member of • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract the American Institute of • City of Fort Lauderdale Continuing Service Contract Architects • Miami-Dade County(EDP)Continuing Service Contract Member of the Urban Land • South Florida Regional Transit Authority(SFRTA) Continuing Service Contract Institute • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update PUBLICATIONS/ • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan & Update Published in the ACSA Journal • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan& Update Lecturer on the Faculty of Architecture at the University • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update of Miami and Florida • Peary Court, Key West Master Plan&Architecture International University • Higgs Beach Master Plan Lectures Nationally on Issues • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning of Architecture and Urban • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Planning • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan "Capacity-based Regulation vs. Form-based Regulation:A New • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan Vision for West Palm Beach"at • Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study the 2008 Annual Conference • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan of the American Association of • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan Urban Planning "Lessons Learned in Hollywood Beach"at the 2006 Annual `� Conference of the American ST.BERNARD I - a,.1 , "..-'ei Association of Urban Planning AREA I PROJECT 1 7 k s r P_ i- �� i't .":„÷S,4 '' '. Technical Assistance Program y _ �y,,:r of the Council of the Southern '�. `� .. '� .. District of Florida and the i y- ' `Y41 Caribbean Institute of •: _ , . *//;;;is`• ` Territorial Development �j "Real Urbanism"Keynote of the r P fF 2008 Symposium"Revisiting - '""`'-• the Redevelopment Plan," Public Investment Center of '-' ;' Florida Atlantic University i 4. ,. AWARDS f - -- r Urban Designer of the Year e ..' "f'" I 2008,American Institute of f-':',- _ j}, Architects,Miami Chapter v Ai ' '4pp} SIXTH WARD, i f ' It k 'i:: 'ir 1 Ir� ,AL.. TREMEI uc V: ,.. '' - ;'. nc ,;,,a Proposed Views of lnfill Housing New Orleans(Post Katrina)Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans:Neighborhood Aerial City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 38 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA Project Manager&Senior Urban Designer Grace Perdomo is an architectural and urban designer with more than 15 years of extensive EDUCATION mixed-use,urban redevelopment,master planning and grant writing experience.As Senior UMaster bD of Architecture in ran Urban Designer at Zyscovich Architects,Grace is committed to sustainable urbanism and University es of ign Miami,1991 has overseen a diverse group of projects centered on downtown and historic neighborhoods Bachelor of Architecture with a focus on community revitalization and mixed-use infill development.She has assisted Universidad Nacional Pedro numerous public and private sector clients in the design and implementation of sustainable Henriquez Urena,Santo plans and design guidelines that improve and integrate density,multi- 1987 Dominican Republic, policies,practices,p g g p g y, 1987 modal transportation,preservation,land use and development to create livable,walkable and diverse communities. Associate in Arts Miami Dade Community College,1981 Working collaboratively in focused multidisciplinary teams and at varying scales—regional, community, downtown urban district and site-specific—Grace's expertise in visioning, PROFESSIONAL integrated planning and urban design has created feasible, desirable and sustainable AFFILIATIONS Associate Member of change in numerous communities across the country. Skilled in translating the principles the American Institute of of new urbanism into pragmatic planning and design solutions for developments in both Architects(AIA)and Congress the public and private sectors, Grace's use of innovative participatory processes and for New Urbanism design tools engage public participants as active decision-makers in visioning, planning FIU Landscape Architecture and community building. Her strengths include grant writing,planning and urban design, Advisory Board. Y 9• 9 9 9�P 9 9 community facilitation and consensus—building with a commitment to shaping the future Coral Gables Chamber of of our communities through good urbanism. Commerce SEE Green Committee member RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Adjunct Professor,University • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract of Miami's Urban Design and Architecture Studios • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan • Creative Village Strategic Planning and Funding Feasibility, Downtown Orlando, FL* • Downtown Albany GA:The Oaks at North Intown Master Plan* • South Columbus GA:Arbor Point Neighborhood Revitalization Plan* • Central Columbus GA:Ashley Station Neighborhood Revitalization Plan* • Downtown Columbus, GA: Booker T.Washington/Historic District Revitalization Plan* • Downtown Phenix City AL: Riverfront Master Plan* ;:;� i J i' !4a I! I 4 :e ', ' 141711 ���i� • _ ' .4111,1, 9 pp 9 1;.,„I,1fIII- :7�. 14411. 4411. e ,- ..< ; 1 _t. t i wrrrr wsq 1 \ - • r 140 ' 'Independent Experience Washington Avenue City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 39 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S G'ouo A -A-cnitecture: &U-oan Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Exoerience&Qualifications GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA Project Manager&Senior Urban Designer LIST OF GRANT APPLICATIONS SUCCESSFULLY AWARDED Since 1999, Grace Perdomo has assisted PHAs and Cities across the country with preparation of Federal and State Grant Applications with a high success rate as reflected in the chart below. Over the past 15 years, these grant applications have been awarded over $415 million in Federal grant Funds and represent over $2.1 billion dollars of current and/or proposed investments in cities across the U.S. NOFA YEAR PHA-CITY COMMUNITY OR GRANT TYPE FUNDED 1998 Tampa,FL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Ponce de Leon Homes) YES* 1999 Birmingham,AL(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Metropolitan Gardens) YES* 2000 Chattanooga,TN(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(McCallie Homes) YES* 2001 Chicago,IL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Robert Taylor Homes) YES* 2002 Columbus,GA(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Peabody Apartments) YES' 2003 Birmingham,AL(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Tuxedo Court) YES 2007/2008 Chicago,IL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Stateway Gardens-Phase 2) YES 2009 Newark,NJ HUD 2009 NSP1(2) Five applications submitted, Baxter awarded first round NSP1 funding 2009 Chicago,IL HUD CFRC 2009 Submitted to HUD for approval Category 1,3 and 4(ARRA Funding) 2009 Chicago,IL CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 2:Public Housing Category 2(ARRA Funding) Transformation HUD Grant Award for$9.99 M 2009 Chicago,IL CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 4:Energy Efficiency/ Category 4(ARRA Funding) Moderate Rehab HUD Grant Award for$18.31 M 2009 Chicago,IL HUD CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 4:Energy Efficiency/ Category 4(ARRA Funding)(2) Moderate Rehab HUD Grant Award for$7.34 M 2009 Chicago,IL HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2(ARRA YES-Awarded 01/14/2010:$98.1 M Funding)(2) 2009 Montgomery,AL HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Submitted to HUD for approval Program 2(ARRA Funding) 2009 Columbus,GA HUD CFRC 2009 Category 4(ARRA Funding) Submitted to HUD for approval 2009 Tampa,FL HUD NSP2-Neighborhood Stabilization YES-HUD Award January 2010:$38.0 M Program 2(ARRA Funding)(3) 2009 Charlotte.NC HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(2) YES-HUD Award March 2010:$20.9 M (Boulevard Homes) Highest Scoring 2010 HOPE VI Grant Application 2009 Montgomery,AL HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(Tulane Court) Submitted to HUD November 17,2009 2009 Houston.TX HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(Kelly Village) Submitted to HUD November 17,2009 2010 Orlando,FL USDOT FY2010 TIGER II Capital Grant(3) YES-USDOT Award October 2010:$10.0 M 2010 Birmingham.AL HUD 2010 HOPE VI Grant(Loveman Village) Submitted to HUD November 17,2010 2010 Albany,GA HUD FY2010 Choice Neighborhoods Initiative YES-HUD CNI Planning Grant Award March Planning Grant(2) 2011:$250K Planning Grant Highest Scoring Grant Application.Only 17 apps awarded out of 119 submittals to HUD 2012 Tampa,FL FY2012 Choice Neighborhoods Implementation YES-HUD Award December 2012:$30.0 M Grant(3) (*)While with Wallace Roberts&Todd(WRT):(1)W+P also serves the PHA as part of The Boulevard Group Program Management Team overseeing HOPE VI program implementation:(2)In collaboration with Boulevard Group,Inc.:(3)In collaboration with Lambert Advisory,LLC City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 40 Professional Architectural and Engineering Se-vices i n Soecialized Categories on an'As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications TRENT BAUGHN, RA,AICP, LEED AP Director of Urban Design As the Director of Urban Design,Trent Baughn has worked on a variety of urban design, EDUCATION 9 9 Y 9 planning and architectural design projects for the public sector.Many of his projects include Master of Architecture University of Florida 1996 zoning analysis, code development and writing, and design guidelines, often involving close coordination with economists.He has developed the expertise required to create and Bachelor of Science in Architectural Engineering maintain close working relationships with governing municipal agencies. Trent authored Technology the first sustainable design code in Florida for the City of Coconut Creek. He also served University of Southern as senior design manager for the Miami Intermodal Center and Rental Car Facility with Mississippi 1992 a former employer where he established successful working relationships with a variety REGISTRATION of public agencies including the Florida Department of Transportation and Miami-Dade Florida Architect#AR 95131 Aviation Department. Trent was also a member of the design team for the Downtown American Institute of Certified Orlando Intermodal Center. Planners#019084 LEED Accredited Professional RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract PROFESSIONAL • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update AFFILIATIONS Member the American g • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning Association Association(APA) • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan& Update Member of the Transportation • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Aesthetics Review Committee • All Aboard Florida Master Planning and Station/TOD Design (TARO),a sub-committee • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan&Update of the Miami-Dade County Downtown Hollywood oun CRA Master Plan Update Metropolitan Planning • D H 9 Circle)( ) t P Organization(MPO) • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element • City of Jacksonville Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan • Downtown Fort Lauderdale Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative • City of Coconut Creek Mainstreet Vision and Master Plan ..ter `--,R-z-,' �`4: i ..,4'''' .. V ' W .i It,:"TEk41-11 ,dl- :.‘.7.4r.- '''' •`tea 'A iR ,,-0 �i �� lfs�� t 6 Pi^�, s c.:9")iii L i ii ..• ..1Si...►' i X City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z VS C OV I C H 41 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MANUEL DEL MONTE Senior Urban Designer Manuel del Monte has worked on a large number of urban design and planning projects EDUCATION throughout the southeastern United States,as well as internationally. In his role as Senior Master of Architecture,Florida International University 2006 Urban Designer, he brings his expertise in visioning, programming, conceptual design, design guideline development and zoning analysis to the firm's commissions. Manny Architectural Studies,Florida International University 2004 has advanced experience in various design software programs including: GIS Mapping Software,Arc Map,AutoDesk,AutoCAD,3D Studio VIZ 4,3D Studio Max, Rhinoceros HONORS& 3D,and Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. PUBLICATIONS Architecture&Connectivity. RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Alfredo Andia,Ph.D.,editor • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract Editorial Universidad UNIACC • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update SECCA HOME House • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning Competition,Honorable Mention • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan& Update • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Selected Work displayed at the 2005 Biennial in the Design • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan& Update District • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle) CRA Master Plan Update • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Plan • Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cape Coral CRA Vision and Master Plan • City of Cocoa Beach Design Standards • City of Ocoee CRA Planning • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan . .., ` , ir- , 4 j/ ft"kl ie. ..._ /111r ., % • - ... ..,*1-. 11,0:. .... . clik • *31' S.'4%'4:111116' - ' IS. _, City of West Palm Beach Downtown Master Plan Update,Zoning&Architectural Standards City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 42 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications THORN GRAFTON,AIA, LEED AP Director of Sustainable Initiatives&Historic Preservation Architect Thorn Grafton directs all historic-related work at Zyscovich,using his personal knowledge EDUCATION and perspective on the unique resources of culture,history,and the environment.A third Bachelor of Architecture Tulane University 1976 generation architect,projects with a confluence of history,community,and sustainability have been at the core of his interests and his philosophy.Thorn's introduction to historic Master of Architecture Tulane University 2004 preservation came in 1969 when his forefather's architectural firm purchased their offices at the sprawling Douglas Entrance complex,a 1926 masterpiece of Coral Gables developer SELECT PROFESSIONAL George Merrick.There he learned preservation tricks such as spreading sheep manure on CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES: new clay tile roof tiles and mild acid etching of copper,to accelerate"patina"on building Engineering for Preservation, materials. Thorn's courses at the Tulane School of Architecture explored the variety of National Center for Louisiana's historic architecture.After graduation, he worked eight intense months as an Preservation Training and Technology,Natchitoches.LA apprentice to three restoration carpenters restoring two 1880's Victorian houses in New Orleans. He returned his Alma Mater in 2004 to deliver the annual Richard Koch Lecture Florida International University: South Florida Native to the Graduate Preservation Studies Program. Landscaping Thorn is a LEED Accredited Professional and founding member of the US Green Building Harvard Graduate School of esign:Sustainable Design Council South Florida Chapter.He has a wealth of experience as a design professional and with Randall Croxton,FAIA has in-depth, specialized training in sustainable and LEED design principles. His project Rock Mountain Institute: experience ranges from historic preservation,community redevelopment,environmental Biomimicry Conference education and neighborhood planning to sustainable design and construction. Southface Energy Institute: RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Green Trends Solar PV training at Miami- • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Dade College and the Florida • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan Solar Energy Center • 21st Street Community Center Historic Adaptive Re-use, Miami Beach, FL • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan REGISTRATIONS • City of Coconut Creek Mainstreet Vision, Master Plan and Design Guidelines Florida Architect#8200 • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan LEED Accredited Professional • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan PROFESSIONAL • Miami Senior High School Master Plan, Historic Restoration&Additions AFFILIATIONS • Coconut Grove Library Historic Building ADA Renovations&Addition Founding Member(and current • Board Member)of the US Stranahan House and Museum Coordination of City's Riverwalk Connection* Green Building Council South • Bethel House African American Bahamian Museum Relocation& Rehabilitation* Florida Chapter • Cauley Square Historic District Preservation& Development Master Plan* Member of the City of Miami • Hurt Building Rehabilitation&Opa Locka Boulevard Historic Master Plan* Historic and Environmental • Historic Preservation of the Royal Palm&Shorecrest Hotels, Miami Beach, FL* Preservation Board • Little Haiti Cultural Center&Caribbean Marketplace President of the Board of • Northwest Gardens Affordable Housing Community Phases I I & IV Trustees of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Biscayne • Seventh Avenue Transit Village Affordable Housing TOD Nature Center on Key Biscayne Member of Miami-Dade County Shoreline Development �' Review Committee__,_ h " - ` 1:- _ ,. - ' ' 1111111 0 Ai y '• _ �', j "I ills it _ + f `iii III I `1 Ill H x ; ..a ni ash; IIIIII PI is.s *,+I ,. IL."� � �` *Independent Experience 218`Community Center City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 43 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DARYS AVILA Jr. Urban Designer&Graphics Specialist Darys Avila has worked on a number of architectural and urban design projects. With a EDUCATION dynamic and fresh approach to project development, Darys maximizes her involvement Master of Science in Architecture and Urban Design and works as an integral part of the team to achieve the best possible design outcomes Colombia University,2010 for the projects and plans in which she is involved.She provides support on urban design Graduate School of and architectural projects, to include conceptual design and massing, design guideline Architecture,Planning and development,zoning analysis and graphic design.Her passion For urban design,improving Preservation(GSAPP) the quality of life of neighborhoods,and respect for the identity of a place are evident in Bachelor of Architecture. her work. Darys is also highly proficient in the preparation of presentations. Summa Cum Laude, Universidad Iberoamericana Darys is highly proficient in graphic design and the preparation of presentations.She has (UNIBE),Santo Domingo,DR advanced experience in a number of design and graphic programs including:GIS Mapping Software,Arc Map,AutoDesk,AutoCAD, 3D Studio VIZ 4,3D Studio Max,Rhinoceros 3D,Adobe Photoshop,Adobe Illustrator and Adobe InDesign. RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element • City of Jacksonville Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan • RonJon Site&Surrounding Area Master Plan and Visioning . • Airport City at Miami International Airport • PGA Waterfront MXD • Yacht Haven Master Plan • Peary Court, Key West Master Plan • Presidential Golf Course Master Plan • Gibson Park Planning Charettes 2.Focus on the Cora ., 7 1 p.m p.iK y f• te' V, 3 91.01,11/WM 1` ` a .sue,., 4 "' yr'Y n ..4.,.., ______, _.... A9. WPM NM . _ moms .. .«A'I •t.r.. --—. _ omerne.,grov...e....14mom an at Xn7-9,197 w•,,..... M`. 3.Increase the Variety of Open Space `, '` , f j *` ��—PlIPS- ' / ' .' ti.. Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan Districts&Guiding Principles City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 44 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S I Group A-Architecture:Planning&Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications FINANCIAL CAPACITY DUN&BRADSTREET'S DUNS NUMBER Zyscovich, Inc.'s D&B DUNS number is 177052818. Zyscovich requested the SQR report from Dun & Bradstreet at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/ servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 and arranged for the Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)to be sent directly to the Procurement Contact at e-mail address:yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov on Friday,October 3,2014 and delivery was verified by receipt. C u ' - , i '..--, opoi-gi 1 .0;ff- laili , ' ii 011" , 0..a i _______„,„,„„........, .........“ ,L_____,,.___-,,,,-,., i fj14iRI.. A�r111rM Lr ` 1 _ ...111.14/f _ . f 1 .' ' ''' '' 1 g. 1 . t I. - (' - •Nig 1 `\:s 1 *N4....„- „mac \ \ P a /1 iiii,i,', r,.,. , , . _ .._ __ _ !Nile i -4-_,1411 . ig_r__,_ A 7 id ..r.:,,00.4,':” Sr: -;1.1.iX'- 411, 1 i 400 Ow r.-/ `/// / ' r y Tin . _ -., l 3 - ''') - y lia..., , 1 ! i t'il 1 4'‘.... ' ) , ! ' " , . - al":1,41 ling_ -,..... .,-- BankUnited Miami Beach City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 45 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S MIAMI B EAC H RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN II III i , 41 ,,,: , ., i I, Approach & Methodology . t f � i, . - - 4 -.41- AI FBI [. 111{' L.. . i iFti. f _ .. i i '1 ..- q R '7... ..r ' ' ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S ,. WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES Arm.. , ' . _. 3` S ti '.'"ro 7 Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Zyscovich Architects is a 90+-person integrated Urban Design,Architecture and Interior Design firm headquartered in Miami, Florida with additional offices in Orlando,West Palm Beach,New York a�!( ,b �./ City,and Bogota.The firm has garnered a reputation for its significant architectural and // a interior design work and for the creative solutions it brings to complex redevelopment / - _� �'�` ♦'%. , master plans and urban renewal projects for cities, towns,and municipalities. ,,,� ~f� Over the past 37 years,the firm has completed numerous master plans, �.� �'i'F-- and urban design projects that successfully integrate visioning,branding, ' and concept development with the needs of the local economy and the __ •,i =.•+''•� "°a.Y `*-- r,,l'rl desires of the community.Our focus is in finding the right solution for ,. ,t_. _ N,,._,,_each project that is based on our client's functional needs, thorough ;err 111,;� , "�`_I_ „ r7/1 economic analysis, a deep understanding of sustainable design and i_ aesthetic value, and a sensibility to the cultural characteristics of the r Y communit Master Plan for the Miami IT/L-r. community. Convention Center 14_' District We are proud to be a part of the South Florida community for over 37 /I years and take great pride in our work, striving to design projects that celebrate and enhance their surroundings.As a firm that has produced varied scales of urban designs,vision and master plans in diverse cities throughout the country,Zyscovich brings a wealth of knowledge in transportation and pedestrian circulation, economic analysis,zoning codes and public participation.We have also developed effective processes and creative tools that can shape the public realm through carefully crafted guidelines. Our team has a solid understanding of how to effectively collaborate with multiple districts,agencies,institutions,and neighborhood groups, while effectively maintaining a coherent vision from the planning and/ --- - V or schematic design phases through construction administration.This .i 1, =ri1 N.—"i'rr Its 11111K experience, combined with our team's intimate knowledge of Miami ' I- li!t!!soh ' !ill ,.. Beach gained through projects such as the Miami Beach Convention j► 'L., ;. '•r :. aim s.. . Center District Redevelopment Plan and Update,the Lincoln Cinema . I _ and Retail Complex,the 500 Block of Collins,the Washington Avenue = -4'', ,_.y.= : e —s` Studies,and many other projects,will allow us to expeditiously complete - any and all proposed projects. Lincoln Cinema&Retail Complex ' One of our primary services is zoning evaluation and code writing ""'" " ""'• ` "" and we are highly skilled at translating a client's vision into a ' —. \ regulatory framework.This often includes design standards which "`"'""' explore more specific language and form related to building .4. P ' ' .k '' '‘ image, design and character. We have developed codes and }' zoning recommendations for more than 25 municipalities and '0\ agencies.We recently completed a zoning overlay and design 4 ' �• `*i,':,44! standards for Downtown Cocoa Beach in coordination with ,F--.- Fiz' , I their redevelopment plan.We provided similar services for the entire Downtown West Palm Beach,as well as for Cape Coral, y, .. ..d — „t Florida and Downtown Hollywood. All three were developed >• : in coordination with a vision and master planning process which Convention Center District Master Plan Update preceded the zoning rewrite. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND WORKING WITH MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS The Zyscovich Team's approach is to facilitate the process from a project's conception through its successful completion. We begin our comprehensive approach to the scope of services by partnering with the client,consultants,and community City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 46 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology to develop solutions that will be thoroughly integrated with their vision. Our team is highly experienced in establishing productive and successful relationships with city staff,lay committees and other _ key stakeholders. This ability to cultivate effective partnerships has • - . led to the successful completion and implementation of numerous high-quality vision and redevelopment plans.By collaborating with city `r` ` • staff and working together,we are able to identify the most important issues and develop realistic and feasible solutions.We have specific and extensive experience working with city officials and municipalities to follow through with entitlement procedures that enable our projects to proceed in a timely manner. The Zyscovich Team's proposed Project Manager and key personnel are all extremely proficient at making clear and effective public presentations and facilitating public meetings.We have successfully e jt ' implemented numerous public outreach and educational campaigns related to redevelopment efforts.As part of our master planning and `"� JP moor P P P 9 � • .�s.�.-- ! � ::� � -�._ .-..: `yam`- visioning efforts we favor building consensus by presenting ideas which — motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have LaN.• successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community workshops, and presentations. While every project is different, we ' have a toolbox of proven techniques for engaging the community,its leaders and key players who will champion the final vision,to include Stakeholder Meetings, Workshops and Charrettes, Neighborhood ,. Surveys,Online Surveys and Forums,Panel Discussions and Advisory _ `4, Boards. Zyscovich considers the process of community engagement, public outreach and stakeholder involvement important components in the development of a sustainable planning framework with special attention paid to the planning of a process that addresses the practical issues of time frames,resources and achievable outcomes.All must be implemented, evaluated,and most likely,modified as needed.One of the first decisions city officials will need to make is how to approach and how best to organize for community and stakeholder participation.Larger cities might establish a citizen committee to shape community involvement procedures across all sustainability program matters. In smaller cities,municipalities, or neighborhoods,a steering committee or task force specifically assigned to sustainability might be more effective. In either case,the committee should represent the demographics and geography of the entire community. Community workshops are an opportunity to listen to the community-at-large and gain further knowledge of their values and desires.They are also where our team will have the opportunity to share and test our observations of existing conditions and economic research,as well as the development of specific concepts and the overall direction of the vision. SUSTAINABLE PLANNING AND DESIGN Zyscovich Architects has a long tradition of expertise in sustainable design, with a commitment to projects that fit their locations, perform their functions well and are designed to last. Our sustainable project approach incorporates an analysis of three key project components: the project program, project budget, and sustainable objectives. Our sustainable design methodology involves a highly integrated design approach incorporating all key team members from ,Nor Immv the project's inception. '-ST DvftO 'W,t,amol +NFMN 'Z,yt. MI WW . w, -` t Sustainable community frameworks attempt to give form and direction w to the environmental,social,and economic activities of a locality.Across I► ' the nation and around the world,communities are taking on the task of both defining sustainability and identifying the requisite actions needed _ to get them there. A good Sustainability Plan is the first step towards creating a more sustainable city. By providing a framework that breaks City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 47 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology down what could otherwise be an overwhelming list of issues and linkages into manageable pieces,it conveys a vision for the future,sets realistic targets,and a plan for measuring progress and achieving community goals. We approach urban planning and design projects by identifying contextual opportunities to . capitalize on past and present characteristics of a particular place and to help frame issues ngreadabout and evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches.Understanding a community's vision r n I S m of where it wants to be is critical.We have termed this design philosophy Real Urbanism°.Real = Urbanism®is a concept that supports sustainable development by understanding how a city came to be and considers past and present development patterns,local and environmental .. :V- needs for better communities,and socioeconomic obstacles and opportunities.Our focus is - - 4 l is on merging the economic development opportunities,based on our economist's market assessment,with appropriate design solutions.Solutions reflect the community stakeholders' iN. needs and desires and match the cultural aesthetic which is inherent in the community,with r special attention to scale,character,and preservation.This design philosophy is featured in two books published by the firm's Managing Principal,Bernard Zyscovich:Getting Real - About Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities and l'ARCAEDIZIONI's Monograph Getting Real About Urbanism: Zyscovich Architecture and Real Urbanism®,featuring Zyscovich projects with a preface Contextual Design for Cities by Frank O. Gehry. In all of our planning work, our focus is on developing guiding principles, goals and objectives collectively to define community scale sustainability, and present a vision of how communities can become more healthy, inclusive, and prosperous across specific categories.These guiding principles,goals and objectives provide a much needed vocabulary that local governments and their communities can use to more effectively strategize, to define their sustainability planning efforts and to identify responsible entities,benchmarks and output targets. Resulting solutions match the issue of sustainability within the larger quality-of-life framework of the community,with special attention to issues of scale, character,and preservation.Unlike prescriptive planning approaches,Real Urbanism®cultivates uniqueness,addressing the origins, history,climate,natural elements,specific needs and future evolution of a place. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Land Use is the most visible of the sustainability planning components.Cities with sustainable land use create an obvious balance of environmental preservation,commerce and livability as well as enhanced systems of connectivity between land use and transportation. We understand that improving the interaction between economic systems, ecological systems,and societal needs and taking a holistic view of all the systems necessary for a sustainable city often identifies opportunities to increase efficiencies, lessen impacts, and provide greater livability. The regulation of land use and development shape issues such as infill development, neighborhood master plans, transportation, housing, economic development,and zoning. Under Land Use and Development,our approach is focused on key planning and design components generally defined by the following focus areas: • Strong Sense of Place:Decisions about land use and development should reflect and celebrate what is unique about a community's people,culture,heritage, and natural history. • Integration of Sustainable Community and Building Features: Sustainability planning should integrate a variety of residential, commercial, recreational, and civic facilities essential to the daily life of residents of differing demographic profiles and at the same time,emphasize green building and low impact development. • Multimodal Connectivity:Communities should emphasize bicycle and pedestrian-oriented mobility,with daily needs situated within easy and enjoyable walking distance of each other. To promote this access, residential, commercial,recreational,and civic uses should be connected by both public and private transportation options. • Open Space:The City of Miami Beach has distinctive neighborhoods and a variety of parks and recreational components. A plan to contain, preserve and/or expand the green spaces that are designed to encourage consistent active and passive use can help further shape the direction of the city's environmentally sustainable City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 48 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology PROCESS While every project is different,we begin by evaluating each project based on four types of neighborhoods which,we believe,are representative of all neighborhoods: • Vital neighborhoods are destinations with cultural arts,beauty,and enhanced services.The greatest challenge in vital neighborhoods is in maintaining affordability for the working class.Vital neighborhoods need to continually self-evaluate for long-term improvement. • Stationary environments fulfill the basic needs of residents, but lack evidence of progress,identity,or a sense of place.They are disconnected from any urban nexus and show little promise for new development. • Disinvested neighborhoods lack the basic standard of living. Their population has significantly declined, property values have continuously depreciated,and the population has no advocacy. • Non-functioning urban neighborhoods have devolved as a result of their own undefined growth and become unlivable because of congestion,pollution,and crime.Diminishing services create zones of disinvestment,and only those residents in the highest economic stratum can safely or comfortably exist. This evaluation typically starts with: 1. A data collection, analysis, and assessment to provide . an overview of historic development patterns, existing •0 k demographics, existing and future land uses, zoning, - infrastructure,transit and transportation conditions,and the ; ; • economy summarized in a series of GIS generated maps and a technical report.This process includes an immersion into the project area for a period of two to five days.This is the :� 3' h< if : best way for our team to get a true sense of the area and — builds a foundation of partnership with the client. Anchor Shops.Miami Beach 2. A public involvement strategy engages stakeholders by asking them to take ownership of their community and contribute to the solutions.The team works with the governing body,citizen groups,and staff to create a list of potential participants for the duration of the project.A series of six meetings evaluates the problems and solutions by shifting participants'role to take ownership of the project and contribute to its success. 3. A market trends analysis will identify economic advantages and potentials Master Plan within each neighborhood including a market analysis for major land use,a residential market and needs analysis,and redevelopment analysis. With the preliminary evaluation completed,we often follow a four step process which includes: 1. Developing a list of vision and goals:objectives and guiding principles based on the community's values,to establish the project goals and provide clarity for the design process. 2. An urban design analysis to explore how the existing issues related to building patterns and land use,identified in the existing conditions analysis, can be resolved by enhancing the public realm and the built environment. This includes testing potential uses and building design for compatibility with the vision and available land. 3. A list of policies and recommendations for growth and development to frame the findings from the urban design analysis and the fundamentals of the objectives and guiding principles.This may include writing regulations and code. 4. A list of catalyst projects and planning priorities,strategies,and program development to provide specific steps for implementing the vision plan goals. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 40 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology ADDED VALUE Zyscovich is motivated to add value to our projects that goes beyond our commitment to quality planning,design and construction.This has included an awareness of multiple funding augmentation opportunities that may be available to projects that use integrated sustainable design in the enhancement of their critical mission. We have engaged in the following initiatives: • Pursue high level sustainable certifications and target awards programs that will bring greater awareness of the project; • Identified portions of projects that can be successfully targeted for community fund-raising after the project is complete; • Have retained funding consultants to create targeted funding campaigns for public projects through 501c 3 "Friends Of..."organizations; • Investigated opportunities to bundle performance contracting for several expensive building features into one managed energy and water saving program, allowing projects to move forward when capital budgets are insufficient; • We collaborate with a local economist who is aware of emerging opportunities in the field of municipal finance as well as local and national federal funding sources. NATIONAL EXPERTISE AND RECOGNITION BY OUR PEERS: Many of our projects have been published in national periodicals, including Urban Land Magazine. Mr. Zyscovich has served on the City of Miami Urban Development Review Board,the Miami Beach Design Review Board,and is a Past Chairman of the Miami Design Preservation League, the historic preservation group responsible for establishing the Art Deco District of Miami Beach. Our Director of Design,Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA, LEED°AP has been honored as the Urban Designer of the Year by AIA Miami.Zyscovich's staff includes more than 20 LEED _ Accredited Professionals who also bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in the realm of 1,15 • Sustainable Design.Some of our relevant awards include:AIA Florida's Firm of the Year;the 1, E ' APA Florida Award of Excellence for the City of West Palm Beach Planning and Zoning;the APA Florida Gold Coast Section Outstanding Master Planning Award of Excellence for the - Park Square at Doral Master Plan;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for the Downtown Miami DDA Master Plan Study;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for Midtown Miami; . and the APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study for Midtown Miami. Zyscovich: Architecture and Real Urbanism MARKET AND FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS A rigorous, independent feasibility analysis—one which ensures that development projects are optimally positioned— substantially reduces the risk for owners and investors.This includes experience among a wide range of real estate uses including: retail/entertainment;office; housing; marina;hotel; industrial;and cultural/civic.They provide more than an indication of achievable rents and absorption. Each of their studies includes in-depth perspectives on the marketplace and detailed design guidelines for architects and planners. In cases where plans already have been drawn up or projects built but require repositioning, they offer a constructive critique about how to make the project more marketable and manageable.Successful projects,whether single use or major mixed use programs,are responsive to fluid market conditions and financial requirements.We strive to position our clients to realize the maximum economic potential of a project. �• , .r ��l r: , ` t. _ i. ; t ,yew �' 3•v,. d ! - Washington Avenue Study,Miami Beach,FL City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 50 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Grouo A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Apo roach&Methodology WORKLOAD Zyscovich is one of the largest architectural firms in Florida with a staff of more than 90 professionals. We therefore have the resources and expertise to expeditiously complete the work proposed by the City of Miami Beach.Our current workload is minimal and when combined with our staff resources,allows us to handle multiple projects concurrently.Our ability to deliver as promised has established our firm as a leader.We are committed to definitive scheduling and timely performance of our services. Our previous successes in the governmental sector are based upon a solid foundation of executing award-winning, innovative concepts that enhance the character of a place and a history of exceeding our clients' expectations. The staff assigned in this proposal will be with the projects from their inception through their successful completion.Additional staff will be assigned as necessary to meet the budget, schedule and programmatic objectives of each project. WORK IN PROGRESS PROJECTS FEE REMAINING MDC Hialeah Campus Remodel&Renovation $56,238.59 Palm Beach State College Building 1 $449,608.25 Hillel Hebrew Day School Multiple Projects $35,000.00 FLL T4 Gate Replacement/Expansion $501,343.02 Michael-Ann Russell JCC $29,899.14 Fort Lauderdale Aquatic Center $609,827.60 All Aboard Florida Station Design N/A per Client Seventh Avenue Transit Village $87,700.58 Panorama 1101 Brickell E Tower $23,358.39 FIU Continuing Service Contract Projects $163,454.00 Brighton Public Safety Building $26,809.07 FAU College of Medicine Office Building $84,209.05 Wedgefield K-8 School $868,150.00 lmmokalee Middle School Addition $81,799.50 Aloft at Park Square Aventura $900,000.00 Miami Country Day School Multiple Projects $634,672.25 Brighton Charter School $33,750.00 Downtown Doral New Charter Elementary $142,090.00 Library Renovation,North Miami $7,500.00 PGA Waterfront MXD N/A per Client Bayside Marketplace Renovation N/A per Client Our Lady of Guadalupe $103,600.00 2600 Douglas Rd Office Tower $41,000.00 AC Hotel Aventura $902,070.00 Big Cypress Ahfachkee School $826,700.00 ME by Melia Renovation N/A per Client Bal Harbour Shops Renovation N/A per Client COMB Washington Ave.Studies $108,000.00 Maxwell AFB Elementary-Middle School $1,218,779.15 Coral Gables Sustainability Master Plan N/A City Village,GA Master Plan $224,900 Total $8,160,458.59 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 51 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services i n Specialized Categories on an'As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PARTICIPATION Although Zyscovich is not an DBE firm, we recognize the importance of nurturing relationships with DBE firms and, as such, have been working with several firms on a regular basis, not just to fulfill a required percentage. Zyscovich is committed to meeting the City's goals for subcontracting with disadvantaged business enterprises as evidenced with our DBE Participation Plan. Depending on the scope of a specific project awarded,we will utilize local DBE subconsultants to the extent possible,to potentially include landscape architects,civil engineers,economists,geotechnical engineers, survey crews, traffic engineers, and environmental engineers to supplement our team, not only to increase our total DBE participation,but to capitalize on these firms'specific knowledge.We have successfully implemented this teaming methodology on countless projects and have found these firms' specific expertise to be invaluable, especially during permitting. We will oversee the work of the disadvantaged businesses to providing mentoring opportunities for these small businesses,ensuring opportunities and experience for these firms while maintaining QA/QC oversight and design compliance for the City. Zyscovich also has a Local Vendor Outreach program in ,., place, in which we identify non-traditional disadvantaged '` I / business enterprises in a project's community for procurement opportunities,such as couriers,print houses,photographers, _ A''' caterers, etc., ensuring that each community we work in receives an economic benefit from the projects we design rr' � beyond temporary design and construction jobs. Zyscovich has an excellent history of meeting or exceeding DBE participation goals. For example, our Miami Dade College Hialeah Campus project had a College-standard maximum participation goal of 25%. We exceeded this amount by utilizing 45%DBE firms.At Miami-Dade County Public Schools,where the typical participation goal is 15-20%, ter' ilic we regularly exceed this with 38-46%participation.We have :' "1,:„..,--.4.,, - -' also exceeded all DBE participation goals on our federal projects for the Department of Defense Eduction Activities ' (DoDEA). In 2012 alone, Zyscovich Architects paid out !- ' ogi 40%of all subconsultant fees to DBE firms,representing 1 M t ' nearly$1.5 million in fees. f r As part of our outreach and internship program,Zyscovich - _ M' has developed an initiative plan to expand opportunities . to subconsultant engineering firms. The program consists of mentoring new DBE subconsultant engineers with experienced engineering firms in order to gain expertise, - knowledge and familiarity with client-specific requirements. - After undergoing several successful projects with the _ - __ _ mentoring firms, they will become one of our prime _ I -- F;<?4� consultants and a partner of Zyscovich. This program has I i — kx*y;; been so successful that several of our DBE engineering i .1 ! oho x.. P artners have outgrown their respective DBE programs. - Our DBE outreach also extends into the federal marketplace and includes national and local post SAME Small Business - Conference and meeting participation whereby we actively seek qualified professional partners for current and future federal and local contract task orders. Lincoln Road Offices,Miami Beach City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 52 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology ZYSCOVICH DIVERSITY Zyscovich supports diversity in our office and similarly supports diversity in our subconsultant teams. We have 90+ architects and other professionals, of which 69%are minorities and 43%are women. We have two women executive board members and four minority executive board members.Our staff represent 26 different countries. It has always been the policy of Zyscovich to be an "Equal Opportunity Employer" and to assure equal employment opportunities in all its practices without regard to race, color, religion, national origin/ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, disability(including anyone having a positive HIV/AIDS status or perceived as having such),age,pregnancy(including pregnancy related medical conditions) or marital status. Zyscovich gives equal consideration to the employment of disabled or handicapped persons for work with the firm that they are qualified to do.To carry out these responsibilities, Zyscovich insures that advertising, recruiting, hiring, promotion, training, transfer, and termination decisions are in 1 accordance with the principles of this Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement. As part of Zyscovich's overall goals,Zyscovich management 1% 1% ■Caucasian Male recognizes that a commitment to fostering workplace diversity 1% 1% ■Caucasian Female is fundamentally a moral and ethical imperative. Zyscovich - firmly believes that in an increasingly diverse national and ■African American Male ■African American Female global marketplace for architectural services,it is essential to Ma be positively attuned to the diversity of the marketplace and •H panic e our clients. Zyscovich firm members and employees must, a"itKFe1"ale therefore, be committed to fostering an atmosphere within 2% sPac#icFemale which diversity is viewed positively in order for us all to achieve s% peak Male success. I Many/Other Male a Many/Other Female 4. • • J . -... r._ •fir- • ris iie Alm - ..-- i s.- -4 # „.., ,, ,I, ,,,,;,, ..... .....-- ........................... ,..:_,.. „..„ ....... r • r - 1 i .1 - 0, _.___._ -------- -..-......._ -- r- , , __--_---, go gra Miami Beach Senior High School City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG ZYSCOVICH 53 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S f M I AM I BEAC H RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN III ■ U • _, .. i Yt P r 3Liw, l Pt g. ve II 4 . Additional Information 1,, i 7 it m ill. —i#0.! . Mfr . I - i. . -, . ZYSCOVICH ,,f _ "" ,.' A R C H I T E C T S -t1 `'' WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES r Group A-Architecture:Planning and Urban Design WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 4:Additional Information ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS The volume of work previously awarded to Zyscovich Architects in the last three(3)years,in accordance with Volume of Work Points,totals$132,000 and therefore should receive the full amount of points for this Evaluation Criteria Category. VOLUME OF WORK AWARDED Washington Avenue Study-Evaluation of Code and Massing $25,000 Washington Avenue Study-Vision and Master Plan $107,000 Total $132,000 VOLUME OF WORK POINTS Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01-$2.000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0, • .• .., - MERIDIAY AYENUF LI _. i : ____, 414 ,gyp —." I O. two . dam■i u.1,1�' � i r�L ..,1211/..11s 1i i Yii,>��s_L l�, ,,� ,I .\ '" ���E 1 l wP3 11u 111,4,00 -rrP ", ': u 7 j 'jam , { q :.. �� i��+#�>y . .� Sill � EucUO AIENUE � ■ '�d•��tiY :�s',b�`' ���_ ���_l � . � l .! � �� I {:_ 11 191 ;1 'i u PP 1 ITE x' ll rk. :1 �IP ILIA,= . ` ri _ ; ' un ii: .i atli4. fill= k l�,ii11iIE1l �T1 1' jr'!Eli '•3 , " 011,1iii � '411. Pr • . = PEAiNSTLVANIA■ ,. vo, _ Is d - '' _ ' ;P WI'''. hLi , ;LI "!"..„'.11E A I C —191! ill r! J > —; „►�r t• � RErE .�• 1, D AtloI 1'F -'' j . U . AYNC,_,WArl, Ils i , , ,_KI 1 ..!.a .4 '.!, f - - .-:. II .•—• -r.. • ,J.,.. . . . , : 7 ,.. fi, , --....,Cu,,iks 4v,...', 1 < . - -. _,a�'� r�yy/ 'i - -----.- 41 4p,i• _ 111.-- , .P ,15,...„,. • • — .. • l P L t- • "',iii ; Washington Avenue Study-Vision and Master Plan City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 54 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S 1 , /\AIAMIBEACH REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Professional Architectural & Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on m an it Needed B asis'-�. --s �r1-, .: u � t°'-'-'"'s" „ r "-:, ' at., T :'' r„ E:1 . .:. --+ •_, �' ` _ �� +, !�. r ,� ♦may F-_ ,... it , _ • ` ., ..,1. ” . -a yc.- ;• n ty '` '.. w �� ,_ s4, t .',1;.io)17 I 'ill :- 4, . , , RFQ 2014-346 YG ' W GROUP A - TOWN PLAN NING ..:y • ho ■ ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES 100 N Biscayne Blvd., 27th Floor Miami. FL 33132 T 305.372.5222 W www.zyscovich.com MIAMI BEACI- RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUPA - TOWN PLANNING r to, M- itr, bai r TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Cover Letter Minimum Qualifications Requirements 3 .a - 2. Experience & Qualifications 13 —\,, 2.1 Projects 14. . .. _ s , , ,..,...._ , _L ., . � iviri- - 2.2 Resumes 35 .`;tom.��: 3. Approach & Methodology 46 .� ., . 4. Additional Information 54 •.' Z."sue'- ,yt -:- ` A-4 1. --4 - .---' #-,..;„ -i)- .-;-:-..1: , , _a,.,ir '''= ` ZYSCOVICH % A R C H I T E C T S WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES miAAAIBEAci. RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A - TOWN PLANNING ig it in 111 a 1 Cover Letter ii • Minimum Qualifications Requirements ,...- - ,,.,,,,, V4 ... - -i a, ' 3 ` 1-' — -- 1 ' y ZYSCOVICH --.1•4 ARCHITECTS -3__ WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES BUILDINGS INTERIORS LANDSCAPES CITIES Z YS C O V I C H 100 N Biscayne Blvd.27th Fl Miami.FL 33132.2304 A R C H I T E C T S t 305.372.5222 f 305.577.4521 e info@zyscovich.com December 2,2014 w www.zyscovich.com • MIAMI • NEW YORK Alex Denis, Director Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: RFQ 2014-346-YG; Professional Architecture& Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis"for Group A-Architecture:Town Planning Dear Mr. Denis and Members of the Selection Committee: ZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS is pleased to submit our qualifications to the City of Miami Beach to provide Town Planning Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis"for a three year contract term,with two one year renewal options at the discretion of the City of Miami Beach.Zyscovich has been known since 1977 for its award-winning town planning,master planning,and urban design projects.Zyscovich is one of the largest multi-disciplinary design firms in South Florida,with offices in Miami,West Palm Beach, Orlando, New York City, and Bogota, Colombia.With over 90 design professionals,Zyscovich has provided municipalities in South Florida and beyond with site planning, master planning,urban design,and place making design services for public facilities.We have successfully integrate visioning, branding,and concept development with the needs of the local economy and the desires of the community.We pride ourselves on creating designs that are a source of civic and municipal pride for the communities that we serve. Zyscovich's professional staff is composed of some of the most creative and innovative urban designers in the country, and our team's enthusiasm for placemaking is embedded in all of our projects.This process begins in our design studio and ends in the field.Our vast experience in public sector urban design and master planning and our understanding of market feasibility help to ensure that our final plans can be realized.Our firm is known for developing creative solutions to stimulate and implement high quality redevelopment while protecting neighborhoods.We have been recognized for this level of dedication and expertise in planning by the American Planning Association and the American Institute of Architects,and will continue to bring this same enthusiasm to the City of Miami Beach. Our skills in facilitating quick responses to public agencies will continue to be beneficial to the City of Miami Beach.We are experts in assessing your needs and expounding on them,ensuring code compliance,community receptiveness and cost control. Our site planning and programming experience of civic venues includes thoroughly examining existing conditions and adjacencies to other structures and facilities. Our experience also includes fitting large facilities on challenging sites, coordinating building massing and orientations, zoning regulations, site utility locations and other impacts, such as traffic circulation and parking and environmental impacts, all of which will be thoroughly analyzed. We are knowledgeable of the current rules and regulations of local,state,and federal agencies as they apply to the City of Miami Beach. With 26 LEED®accredited professionals on staff, we are also fully capable of providing sustainable designs for a variety of project types. Our approach integrates physical planning solutions with economic development,capital improvements,and community input.We will use stakeholder recommendations and past planning efforts to understand the community issues and concerns and transform this content into cohesive and viable solutions.We have vast experience building consensus by listening to the community and presenting ideas which motivate residents to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community workshops and presentations and can offer this expertise, along with our proven ability to work with existing developers and city officials to complete projects of any scope or scale.Our design process considers all aspects of a place—past and present development patterns,population characteristics,local needs for better communities,history and culture,and economic obstacles and opportunities—to create an authentic environment specific to each location. Licenses Architectural AAC.001431 ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S As the authors of numerous design standards and regulations,we bring a very specific understanding of these dynamics as they apply to the City of Miami Beach.It is hard for us to imagine a place that is a better fit than the for our fundamental approach to community redevelopment, historic preservation, land use planning and urban design.We have created master plans in more than 30 different municipalities,including multiple projects produced under continuing contracts. We are honored to have been awarded,as associate Architects and Planners,the All Aboard Florida project,which will provide a private passenger rail between Miami and Orlando. Zyscovich was also awarded the Architectural Services contract for the 7th Avenue Transit Village Project, a transit oriented development(TOD) and multi-modal hub for Miami-Dade County.The firm is also completing the construction of the Seminole Tribe of Florida's Brighton Reservation Tribal Services & Public Safety Project. We also recently completed a New Vision and Future Land Use Plan for the entire City of Jacksonville.Zyscovich also worked with Miami-Dade County's Equitable Distribution Program continuing contract to design the renovations of the Coconut Grove Library, and also worked with the Miami-Dade Parks and Recreation Department to provide recommendations for design criteria alterations to incorporate the new County mandate for LEED Silver compliance with all new construction projects.We currently hold the City of Miami Beach/ CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract for Planning and Urban Design Services. Some of our notable projects in Miami Beach include the Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan and Update, the Lincoln Cinema, Retail Complex and Parking Garage,and the Miami Beach High School Master Plan and Phased Replacement. Though we are a large firm, our principals provide direct attention to each project from inception to completion. In addition to the leadership and guidance from our firm's principals,we have assembled an in-house team expressly chosen For their expertise in municipal planning and urban design and their knowledge of the City of Miami Beach and its regulating agencies.We are confident that our attached qualifications package will further describe our capabilities and areas of expertise. We look forward to continuing to provide the City of Miami Beach with Continuing Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis." Sincerely, ZYSCOVICH ARCHITECTS Bernard Zyscovich, FAIA President Licenses Architectural AAC.001431 Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez(c�miamibeachfl.clov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Zyscovich, Inc. No of Years in Business: 37 No of Years in Business Locally: 37 No of Employees: 90 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Zyscovich Architects FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 100 N. Biscayne Blvd.,27th Floor CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33132 TELEPHONE NO.: 305.372.5222 TOLL FREE NO.: n/a FAX NO.: 305.577.4521 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 100 N. Biscayne Blvd., 27th Floor CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33132 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Bernard Zyscovich, FAIA ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305.372.5222 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: n/a ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: bernardzyscovich.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-2754852 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is roposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. Not Applicable SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an .ublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES WITH A CONTROLLING FINANCIAL INTEREST Zyscovich Architects City Commissioner Joy Malakoff;$500 contribution on 10/21/2013 Bernard Zyscovich Jose Murguido 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. ZYSCOVICH BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT The successful business operation and reputation of Zyscovich, Inc.is built upon the principles of fair dealing and ethical conduct of our employees.Our reputation for integrity and excellence requires careful observance of the spirit and letter of all applicable laws and regulations, as well as a scrupulous regard for the highest standards of conduct and personal integrity. The continued success of Zyscovich, Inc. is dependent upon our employees'trust,and we are dedicated to preserving that trust. Employees owe a duty to Zyscovich, Inc. and its clients to act in a way that will merit the continued trust and confidence of the public. Zyscovich, Inc. will comply with all applicable laws and regulations and expects its principals, associates, City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYSCOVICH 4 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements supervisors,and employees to conduct business in accordance with the letter,spirit,and intent of all relevant laws and to refrain from any illegal, dishonest, or unethical conduct. In general. the use of good judgment, based on high ethical principles, will guide you with respect to lines of acceptable conduct. If a situation arises where it is difficult to determine the proper course of action, the matter should be discussed openly with your supervisor, Human Resources Manager, COO or CFO for advice and consultation. Compliance with this policy of business ethics and conduct is the responsibility of every company employee. Disregarding or failing to comply with this standard of business ethics and conduct could lead to disciplinary action, up to and including possible termination of employment. 6. •. .. •. ..• _ . •- t-..• ...• _.. . •- • . - -• - - - . _ •.. • --- _ • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012 13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's same(in a particular year). fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 5 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements • - ... 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt 9.19.14 Addendum 1 11.12.14 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 9.30.14 Addendum 2 11.18.14 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 10.07.14 Addendum 3 11.24.14 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 10.17.14 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 10.31.14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 7 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed--Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipients convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H g Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Bernard Zyscovich,- 4L.A President Signature of Pro.oser's Authorized Representative: Date: 12/01/2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this 1" day of December 2014,personally appeared before me Bernard ZyscoMwbb, FAIA County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President of Zyscovich,Inc. , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Lisette Marie Sierra #FF 131587 Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: 09.04.18 .4 3.41 41., LISETTE MARIE SIERRA I is .i Notary Public-State of Florida GaiG�/"�- pr,4" My Comm.Expires Sep 4,2018 'q,ofat7 Commission+P FF 131587 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 9 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements CORPORATE CHARTERS, PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS Attached are the current corporate licenses, registrations with the Department of State and specialty certifications for our team. ACIII 705241 STATE OF FLORIDA asrAltTMCAR or BvskHBTs Ax lnw�lr 1►rial State of Florida ap AR_}t1 �T 13113.cu1.1..«.. 12/1413012.1202442711 itAC001431 , • ara- Department of State eas ARCHITECT °" ll..aa baler 111 CmR/ilD? Under tab provisions of Chat . Oxeiratim dates EBB 211, ME,' •, 100/2/Gff1 t SLED!L 27 27111u1 '` I certify from the records of this office that ZYSCOVICH,INC.is a corporation NQANI FL 3313 r y ' ,. organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on October 30,1986, effective October 30,1986. 4e,ROSIT 11114111r The document number of this corporation is M40936. _DISPLAY ASREOUIREDBYLAW I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through A0#TO165fi — December 31,2013,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report STATED/FLORIDA ' was filed on January 3,2013,and its status is active. Dd»iii1aI1 ,-swasas»siNas. , to 4s1�•_ . - I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. 11�E�[ls11�� r�sLL7rli1 J1202430os 00074_ -•lig .' -p vvtsla�is 01 chaps• �_ .y t�isattes damn ns 2s. 3015 s a. s. Given under my hand and the � aNr Great Seal of the State of Florida 3�j0'5,t`D-,t„,. 17i at Tallahassee.the Capital,this is the Third day ofJanuary,20[3 .,,, x-,.‘,..• .,,:k _QI.LA1!dit!lEDOVl/11r t,. .r,;�'� AC#17`07481 IS'rATSOFIFICI11011� ‘..--4. • Secreta •of State I '®01 Lt21t111'11f f 7 ,.Y r ' Mail 'II .4131 ,sii,... - r, Authentication ID:CC%59715848 named bald 118&SCUM Ducar tbs-Drava off u. 4,. To authenticate this certiftcate,visit the following site,teter this Lei:atlas dates�2$. 20 1•- .n ED,and then follow the instructions displayed. . https://efile.sunbis.orgicertanthyer.html Wri&IM C , MIMI PL 3312!' - .'i aireellar f LBT DORM Ad 1�1BneDSY t�11A1 Local Business Tax Receipt STATE OF FLORIDA Miami—Dade County, State of Florida *wJ DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND THIS IS NOTA BILL TO NOT PAY S PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 5262571 AR0008200 ISSUED: 02/05/2013 IMUIENIIISS NAME/LOCATION RECEIPT NO. EXPIRES ZYSCOVICH INC RENEWAL SEPTEMBER 30,2015 ARCHITECT 100 BISCAYNE BLVD 26FLOOR 5499421 Must ba displayed at.lace of business GRAFTON,R THORN MIAMI FL 33132 Pursuant to County Code Chaster 8A-Art 9&10 OWNER SEC TYPE OF BUSINESS pAYM[NT R[CHIV[D ZYSCOVICH INC 21:P AJCORP PARTNERSHIP�FIRM BY.f.Tr I.[CTOR IS LICENSED undo"the provisions of CP.481 FS Employee(s) 5 LC26000298 145.00 07/16/2014 Etmaat=date FEB 20 2015 Ll302050oC1516 CHECK21-14-022409 This tacat Bam.ss T.a 4..St oaIY es.finru payment al the Laral Basins.Tat.The Receipt is net•NSs welter a cafahc.ho.of du bads s gaeliheaha..ado sasinm.Holder not eoo,ry with tae daeu[Usa.l et,MpneMtamal reaalatary laws sad requIrerta.a whah apply to me Mimeos. The RECEIPT N0.above mat be displayed oa all commercial wholes-Miami-Dada Cod.Sae b-DB• for more information,rant wrw tne+.date aastaaeellaeta City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 10 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements The U.S.Green Building Council Zlecevkk, Mont Certificate of Membership Asa balanced,conernaus cordition repainting the entree budding forkesty,we prom.4, Ow design roestowursc,and operation of budding'dot are envininunntrdiy resporrobre profitable,sad ladlay plows Wine and work AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Sennrd Zysenricb 'December— 31.2002 Member asc•2094 eldISAdt 240444.) 0.1ime itadient it 010 Pa.0 J -1 J J J LEED J J AP GBCI Et+C GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Russell Thorn Grafton Suria Yaffar LEED AP BUILDING DESIGN•CONSTRUCTION LEEIr ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL •1": R k"- tfi e-47, J r J J J J J GEIC1 fill 'J214" Aloot • — - The U.S.Cneenlluilding Council 1111 • Thom Grafton Imo stwoumndly aliiMotenslidknowlatir al dur V wn WWI%design ImiNotsitectium Wray and the 1011.1.41101.16WEI 2 Corn ltadiding Ulan 9/1634;ltaronwec and Proms requirvd 11.,.rhatie.1 the'ler of LEE!).v2 Accredited Professional AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Turas Are limbs LEEQ. MINIM Mamba 31.2002 17a—c.FAA-, S PArturd frtattro errrront ra,...tFoamilni,luttenan City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYS C OV I C H Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" ARCHITECTS Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 1.3:Minimum Qualifications/Requirements CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE The schedules below document Zyscovich's current insurance coverage:Schedule A certifies our Commercial General Liability, Business Automobile Liability, Umbrella Liability and Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions coverage, and Schedule B confirms our Worker's Compensation policy. SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B .......... ZYSCINC-01 ZGONZALEZ +'AMti ZYSCINC01 KNMI `°R° CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I 20011 i9' " CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I °';,,,2," „ THE CENTIMCAT!IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO MONTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER Of NFORMATIDN ONLY AND CONFERS NO RONTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THU CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED EY TIE POLICES CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES EI LOW. TIP CIRTMICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT EMMEI THE ISSUING NSIEEIES),AYFNORMED BELOW. TIES CERTIFICATE Of INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING MSURER(S),AUTNORCEED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER.AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. MMORTANT: 0 TM e.t.a.helm.I.an ADDITIONAL NSURED,0,.BAWEs)mast is.ndas.d.E SUBROGATON E WARM®.SNORE 0lo IMPORTANT:E BM 000000 MPH 0 an ADDTIONAL INSURED.N.FWky(A$)AIM be Andaman.0 SUBROGATION U WAIVED.sub".0 M Imo and..n.N11m.00..p.lAy,,.ON,pal..n00 NAM.an mamma...A 1M11n0d.n NA.0.001211 does not Amiss dohs 0 BL. Me 11rMS ate 0130016 or IM males.ana.patty may 1$0015 an Mdanowan0 A Pam..on ChM e.r1111m11 Gem mat canter 0001.M N. eWW0.bolder M MM of..aden.a.0t{s). cwt...MEW In Mu of s.M such.nd01 .n... MCaI “Tgrr ZOada GOI8WE2 _ __. _--• MIN PROW= J cT A°`F°M�a Fr.ne,LLC 20 822-7500 I° : E 04443 Automatic Rooming Insurance ASOO Inc a.R I OCAO e ADP eo.Mr. S.R.300 *wow NlwealezAcamk.com Rom..NJ... AeMIMe M EM L.M..FL 33006 M.RMmAw..eM.12.MAm Iw3. eMRM11 11IRImMOTORM. MNR_ .Mama A:Travelors Indemnity Co.of An.. 25004 MAIM A:BEN:-BrIGgllsd Employers I _ IMMO MUM•:t.OXA010n Ins Co 10137 MMIIIM Zys1UNCh,Inc. MUM•: ZyseeM12,One. mum c: _ 100 5150511,Blvd MIMM e: USN North SW..YTM Swim. MUM 0: 2710 Floor I MMO: M11MLFL 33102 MWni,FL 33132- swum 11: 'mum A• Mom P: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE WOW REVISION NUMBER: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NMBEI: REVIEWN NUINIEt THIS U TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED PASEO ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TEE POLICIES CF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PEIOD INDICATED.NOTAITH STANDING ANY REOUIREME T.TERM CA CONOMCN OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT MATH RESPECT TO WHCH THIS ONO CATEO NOTNRHSTAPC NG ANY REOUREMENT TERM OR COMM.OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOWNES.YETIS RESPECT TO MACH THIS CERTMCATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL TIE TERMS. CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR WY PERTAIN TIE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIOm6 MO CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHORN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CUPS OCCLUSIONS PO 00.1OT101E Of SUCH POLICIES.UNITS SHOWN MAY RAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PROCLAIMS EY Aast$ 1111E CIMORMON a PM1eMIM I e. =M % JEE TMO SNmA.a RUMP 1010 aMaMLLaMRR EAw.00AaaCE s 1400000 MMIAU EP.ODCM.MtE S A 7 comm..cola.uAwr, 5050070W1A 47X2514 42M13 s 1400400 COSINERWL MOORS LLLEMTY PRMYMa0rm. S ca0M.MAMo OCCUR MD END NN R.p.W . 10.00E I.IAROMADE❑OCCUR MD EU.._,..001 S Pamma scm AMY . 1400.000 - PERSONAL FMUMMY • amen.AmRwn s 2400,000 MOM.0011131311 S oENLAOaREGATE MT AMER Pa: PAmICn.Canr.m S 2400400 COWL.00.193011t LMAAMAPEE PRNICn•COMP POO S 7.0.,1l°R na 7...Y17% no Am.rM..MAMmY 0L1MS.10I.LRNT 1400.000 ATMLOMaL.Manr `a'W'M"'°`E`"n A X NO AUTO BANT7MU2 4/X2014 IOM'S mom MAIn,4,....00 S Nn Aro MaL.NA1MlP.me, AuO.Mm '—swam. s00EraaMrlP.aA..S �...emu ROOKY MAIM O.aara S Aron moos :*mom.T...... IIT.i 3jt/ s °.X .O 12.,ROOM S 1MMA"U� aoras X IoraaALUA. UP OCCUR/MACE S S4N,000 III�AUA. HOC.°R Ewu°CCURRENCE S A �.ur 12.1(OANaa,,,DE CYPMNT52. 4/X2014 475051E ADmBATE S 5400.000 .......... 1 'CNMINAOE AaMaArt S MD I X)RETM°0hs 10,000 S DED I j RETMTO S S NORKERECIOMMIREOCRI M.RAIE COM.MSATNn I sA i I°R , %I melnAUm� I°a NN nMRIDtOITAE n o05% S A an�.Eyomr ©n1A 010373.1 1m4G014 1X4001. EL.EACH A..Oar S 1,000.000 afA%MIBIM11 F1ICILIOMI ❑MI• IMM..s•MR EL MIME LS. •,S 1400400 m�T..Ar..vhw EL DOOM•a BMLOYIG s r.M1..Nr MITAT NOA"MAMASs w uaMAM.POLICY LW s _ aaEMN�OAr. _ EL DMEAm-PaF.Ern S 1,000100( B Pvetes.WWLNM. 820352.34 402014 462515 Fads CY. 3404000 B 00.0.0500.0.10 82082.34 4012014 40211$Ann'.Aeons. 5400.000 .mAPTImO.AaTt•1 LOCRIMMI MRCSM VmMACME ICI.ROMM R..M.aeY Ewan soma..... a e.nm a os.,aMlLeaaa.31•18CIER Pe.MAC.m SRL Arr.aMM...M.Mo.M.M.A.Nw h olm..U.W.R.11e..w.Dd.Orn.n:51OOA1ten0 LI.NIIy Deductible 1N,m2 Emh CI.NR CERTIFICATE HOLDER _CANCELLATION CEi71RPATE HOLDER C000lATN7N SHOULD ANY OF THE AKRE DOME.FOUOES N CANCELLED MOM MOULD ANY OFHEABOVE DE5CRM0 POW.2.CMICELLED BEFORE THE CINIIATHM DIRT!THOME,IOTNUR SILL N DELNaO IN S P!C I M!N'FOR USE MAIM PROPOSALS ONLY THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE MLL N DELIVERED IN ....view.,Inc.... AeconwiC!N.T A POU.PROMMOIE ACCORDANCE MTH THE POLICY PROW.* - Anq®RMRaMnme AVnIa®walnTR. ■ 01Ep-2010 AC010O CORPORATION NI nylla reserved. 0/02.1010 ACORD CONFORATEN.AE rights now . ACORD 25 301600) TM ACORD norm and low an 0g oS.W moths of ACORO ACCNID 25(mtOR ) TIM.ACORD now and logo an nyNl.d nu.d ACpID City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 12 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S MIAMI BEACTI RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A - TOWN PLANNING III a , ,. _ . .. . II .. _ . . . ._, Experience & Qualifications • 2.1 Projects 2.2 Resumes . yp ac I. '• 17 \ 1...! iii11f.� a Y .1r. '`` q ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S v -- WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES - v- - Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications FIRM PROFILE Zyscovich Architects is a 90+-person integrated Urban Design,Architecture and Interior Design firm headquartered in downtown Miami with additional offices in Orlando,West Palm Beach,New York City,and Bogota.Zyscovich Architects,a Florida-based corporation, was formed in 1977 and incorporated in 1986. The firm has garnered a national reputation for its expertise in the area of market-based design r°= Ilit I I$1fltt i pia: solutions,as well as For the creative and implementable strategies it brings '° , • �,,_s4 �; r - to complex redevelopment master plans and urban design projects.Over .>f° . the past 37 years,the firm has produced numerous master plans and urban .4 _ f' design regulations that successfully integrate visioning and design concepts ;,� �'� /" , } i A s f he local economy and the desires of the community.We with the needs o f o y y have provided these services to both the public and private sectors—locally, t °� nationally and internationally. SERVICES AND EXPERTISE:As a firm that has produced varied scales of urban designs and master plans in diverse cities throughout the country,Zyscovich brings a breadth of knowledge on current effective processes and creative tools that can shape the public realm through carefully crafted guidelines. Our team has in-depth knowledge and a solid understanding of urban planning,code writing,municipal code implementation,and how to effectively integrate multiple districts, agencies, institutions and priorities into a coherent vision. This experience, combined with our considerable in-house resources,will allow us to expeditiously complete any of the proposed work. • A CUSTOMIZED APPROACH TO CREATING VALUE: We approach urban - about planning and design projects by identifying opportunities to capitalize on past and present rbanism characteristics of a particular place.We have termed this design philosophy Real Urbanism°. _ `'p CITIES Real Urbanism°is a concept that supports sustainable development by understanding how _ a city or neighborhood came to be and considers past and present development patterns, local needs for better communities,and economic obstacles and opportunities.Our focus is is on merging economic development opportunities with appropriate design solutions. ,. Solutions reflect the community stakeholders' needs and desires and match the cultural . aesthetic which is inherent in the community,with special attention to scale, character, _ • . and preservation.This design philosophy is featured in two books published by the firm's Managing Principal, Bernard Zyscovich: Getting Real About Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities and I'ARCAEDIZIONI's Monograph Zyscovich Architecture and Real Urbanism®,featuring Zyscovich projects with a preface by Frank O.Gehry. Getting Real About Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities WORKING WITH MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS: Zyscovich has specific and extensive experience working with city officials and key stakeholders to develop clear Visions and implementable Master Plans. By collaborating with stakeholders and City staff,and forming a true partnership,we are able to identify the most important issues in a community and to develop realistic and feasible solutions to those issues.As part of our master planning and visioning efforts,we favor building consensus by presenting ideas which motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community workshops,and presentations. NATIONAL EXPERTISE AND RECOGNITION BY OUR PEERS:Many of our projects have been published in national periodicals,including Urban Land Magazine.Mr.Zyscovich has served on the City of Miami Urban Development Review Board,the Miami Beach Design Review Board,and is a Past Chairman of the Miami Design Preservation League, the historic preservation group responsible for establishing the Art Deco District of Miami Beach.Our Director of Design, Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA, LEED'AP has been honored as the Urban Designer of the Year by AIA Miami.Zyscovich's staff includes more than 20 LEED Accredited Professionals who also bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in the realm of Sustainable Design.Some of our relevant awards include:AIA Florida's Firm of the Year;the APA Florida Award of Excellence for the City of West Palm Beach Planning and Zoning;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for the Downtown Miami DDA Master Plan Study;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award and the APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study for Midtown Miami. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 13 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE RECORD Zyscovich employs cutting-edge research to address the ever-changing landscape of urban planning and architecture. We are known for our implementation of proven technology and high performance green design strategies that improve building performance,reduce long-term operational costs,and protect the environment.Our design philosophy focuses on the origins and evolution of a site, and opportunities to add value in appropriate ways. Density, diversity, activity, safety, greenspace, pedestrian friendliness and mass transportation—values such as these are applied, promoted and articulated in projects whether civic,academic or commercial.It is the firm's belief that great design is not only aesthetically pleasing, but complements,enhances and is respectful of the surroundings. Our proposed team has extensive experience in the design of projects of the different sizes,scopes and complexities that may be required by the City of Miami Beach.We currently hold numerous continuing service contracts of varying sizes for a variety of clients,including the City of Fort Lauderdale,the City of Miami,Miami-Dade County,and Florida International "" University, to name a few. For the past 37 years the firm has 'Y"--'=- ° r t provided urban design, architectural design and master planning services to more than 40 different municipalities - , 1 ' -� ' ,--=',..-'f" _ 4.. and public entities.Our clients also include the Cities of West -_ ,- - . ..r Palm Beach, Jacksonville, and New Orleans, as well as the _�� ,.2 . �--- i.` . z. '? '--'14 Counties of Broward,Palm Beach and Monroe.Our record of sift:.' `.��„�� a:: r - �,. dF•". art performance,including our willingness to meet time and budget ,-,, ∎,. `� , requirements,is proven by the fact that a vast majority of our T �.olip- clients are repeat clients,not just for a project or two but year ,` ; after year because of our commitment to high quality design - �- 1! }'`•"` and responsive customer services.Our long history of efficient R contract administration is also evidenced by our favorable client '1` performance ratings. City of Miami Omni 14th Street Media&Entertainment District V Zyscovich also has considerable experience in planning and urban design. Our 111* ' /, 4 professionals includes several licensed urban planners that have produced numerous -- , 4 master plans and urban design regulations that successfully integrate design --'"� ' concepts with the needs of the local economy and the desires of the community. 4.-4 , ' �; I We have provided these services to both the public and private sectors nationally $' r ��, and internationally.We have specific and extensive experience working with city .'r�� °S ' i\ - j officials and key stakeholders to develop clear and implementable master plans. �- �' Y P P P !i: 1., tt'11:"-'111-a? � '�) ,,im�• By collaborating with the city,official and staff and forming a true partnership,we �, >4 - • r. are able to identify the most important issues and develop realistic and feasible I.' solutions. V .�.z.;�r':; ; r.. As part of our master planning and visioning efforts we favor building consensus - by presenting ideas which motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive ,\ �;• - --'_ _ -`` r,, -" • vision. We have successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings, !' -'r . ' 'a 44' ' A-.‘it community workshops and presentations.Our master planning and urban design di t i`ll :i Ij,',i 0 ,; services include redevelopment,urban design,neighborhood planning,community )!,.41 l ' 's11 `.- �.� \ outreach, zoning and design standards, land use and comprehensive lannin _� • li'ill 9 9 P planning, f i �1 . !1111, '�;.. , 4,�.'' ' ' master planning,visioning,public/private initiatives and infill development.Our *�- 1iii, '" �•- - '? extensive experience combined with our commitment to personalized service,• -'_plipillip,i ,., , : will bring additional value to the City of Miami Beach.We have a dedicated staff r,J*•..,4.. �^-....zt k.... mgt' a , _ ,�-• comprise of planners,architects and designers who possess a passion for creating :, .,Kti, % ,.,rte, , inspiring places in which to work,live,and play. City of Miami Omni 14th Street Media&Entertainment District City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C OV I C H 14 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH/CMBCRA CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Miami Beach,FL WASHINGTON AVENUE STUDY-VISION AND MASTER PLAN KEY FEATURES Zyscovich Architects was commissioned to do a conceptual master planning study to Visioning examine the current development guidelines for the Washington Avenue corridor between Urban Fabric Revitalization Fifth Street and Lincoln Road.Zyscovich studied potential changes to the guidelines that Master Planning will encourage appropriate,context-sensitive redevelopment and made recommendations Context Sensitive intended to enhance the vitality of the corridor.The study analyzed the impact of additional Redevelopment floor area ratio(FAR)and height.An increase in the FAR of any property requires a voter Maintenance of Historic referendum, making it necessary for the community to be able to visualize the impacts Structures of such changes. Historic Facade Restoration At present, portions of Washington Avenue contain bars and night clubs which are only Increased F.A.R. activated at night, leaving historic storefronts empty during the day. Other portions of Existing Condition Assessments Washington Avenue contain T-shirt shops,souvenir shops,tattoo parlors and other types of retail that do not enhance the corridor or serve the local community.The City of Miami Highest and Best Use/Land Value Optimization Analysis Beach hopes to provide better maintenance of historic structures along the corridor. The ability to develop additional floor area above the ground floor retail in exchange for Growth Management and y P g g Smart Growth Initiatives improving ground floor uses and restoring historic facades was explored. Land Development Regulations The scope of work included massing studies and perspective studies at various key locations, Sustainable Design Guidelines particularly where significant historic structures are located and where the tallest building Market Based Solutions heights are proposed. The study depicted the current development potential of the Zoning Recommendations Washington Avenue corridor and the proposed development potential.Various scenarios Community and Stakeholder were represented, with increased FAR and height, and with reduced parking along the Involvement corridor. CLIENT/CONTACT The fact that the majority of buildings along Washington Avenue are contributing structures City of Miami l Beach _City Moraes in a historic district was taken into account.The study identified the relationships between 305.67mmy 3.7010 the current and proposed building sections to ensure compatibility with the surrounding JimmyMorales@miamibeachfl. neighborhood.The study also visualized ideal maximum heights,number of stories,parking gov requirements,and FAR for three geographically different and varied block sections of the DURATION study area. First Contract:1990-2005(Due to age of project) Second Contract:2010-On- a j lir ] twF r= `�Gr•• l going r r • •: t! , I ■S + ';Ii @ t}'M/8111 i�.�1I ter _C {:; !!n i „" ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY _ _____:._A_ _ .''r '____� �Y'.�FI"I`h �I ' :� ' 1 �j•I' +` Urban •Revitalization,Master 7P` i t Iii '� } E ' t�:; t a;N 111K1'-' !-11 1 1iI�4: Y ` Development Planning and II. `i �I_ d 1+ Ail' 4n ��I$ = i JI't e,1! y,, Guidelines ,.1,.tllll CIFYIIF - ,. - I, �� •ii:,i;Y�l `�i 119!z� ' I: .4,, TEAM MEMBERS __+ rXFl Ylrw'.Il .+ _"" wFa" _ `�^�lr INVOLVED e Bernard Zyscovich 1 Suria Yaffar * - Virg, �---_ Grace Perdomo .r„, t Trenton Baughn w `a ,i Thorn Grafton � >s �' ��'�, Darys Avila Manuel del Monte s 1 .i " -- +V _gyp_ City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 15 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications WASHINGTON AVENUE STUDY-EVALUATION OF CODE AND MASSING EXERCISES The city is considering options to encourage and promote appropriate,context sensitive, redevelopment and provide better maintenance of historic structures along Washington Avenue.One option being explored is providing property owners the ability to develop additional floor area above the ground floor retail in exchange for improving ground floor uses and restoring historic façades. The goal of this project is to examine the current development rules for the Washington Avenue corridor between sixth Street and Lincoln Road and to see what changes to those rules might incentivize appropriate,context sensitive redevelopment. The study result will be conceptual;the purpose of which is to visualize the impact of additional FAR and height. Issues related to property ownership and aggregation will not be taken into account. Existing land development regulations governing this portion of Washington Avenue provide for a maximum floor area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 for commercial uses and 2.0 if 25%of the floor area is used for residential or hotel uses. The height limit is 50 feet and the parking requirement is significant. To date, other than 555 Washington and 1601 Washington, there has been no redevelopment project on the east side of Washington Avenue that adds residential, hotel or office uses above ground floor retail. If the study recommends an increase in the FAR of any property, it will require a voter referendum;therefore it is essential for the community to be able to visualize the impacts of such changes. III ,, ....Ye iM1 �y IIIlI1i i 711 i'wr 1 ' + �t �� t , . '� ,T. ., iw �w41 ' ".e ill II S 1 • ... ...,....._._, ,.. .. , r 0.A. ' / _I = ! pp ,f,,,:. S a 9_p mi .: ,...ter TINES SQUARE k CAFETT?RIA .p - 1 6RtYPOL10 f - , ., a-^ yN., y ) - i` , loiiic., .1,::,,,, , )1 „dr; ' , , _- - -•.44L, • 6, .1.. , , ti t„,, itukt,,-- a ri.,...____ -- II, _. , _ ,,,,,„, „4,..... ...„.......,, --- _ __ ..lb _—.:.. - _ ,. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346—YG Z YS C O V I C H 16 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Fort Lauderdale,FL SEBASTIAN/ALHAMBRA PARKING LOT FACILITY AND OCEANSIDE KEY FEATURES PARKING LOT FACILITY Master Planning Zyscovich was commissioned to provide Feasibility Studies for three projects which included: Visioning a Garage,a Plaza,and a Garage with a Plaza,in addition to Concept Site Plan& Building Programming Designs.The Sebastian/Alhambra Parking Lot Facility and Oceanside Parking Lot Facility Site Evaluation&Analysis projects are to become a catalyst for economic activity. It is therefore critical that they Transit Oriented Development integrate and synergize with the community,supplementing the already vibrant economic activities on Ft. Lauderdale Beach,and are financially sustainable themselves. Feasibility Studies Concept Site Plan As part of the Ft.Lauderdale Master Plan Projects,the Oceanside Parking Lot Facility and Building Design Plaza project will provide an opportunity to amplify the significance of Las Olas Boulevard Parking Garage as a gateway and landmark with a series of integrated public spaces that connect the beach Open Space&Plaza Design to the Intracoastal Waterway.Our vision is to create a financially sustainable garage which contributes to the vibrant beach community. Sustainable Design Project Phasing The creation of an active Oceanside Plaza from the existing surface parking lot adjacent to Local/Regional Transportation the new four-story parking structure will continue the pedestrian entertainment experience Analysis and become a focus point for off beach activities. This space can become a setting for Retail&Economic Market outdoor performances, events, and outdoor markets or simply a place to meet friends. Analysis Drawing upon the sight lines from Las Olas Boulevard,the Oceanside Plaza will amplify the Multiple Stakeholder and connection to the beach through bold,organizational geometry emphasizing the view to Agency Coordination the ocean.The elevator for the parking facility will extend in a vertical tower for viewing the Community Enhancement beach and will be an architecturally significant landmark attraction.Connecting Oceanside Engagement of Exterior Plaza to the beach,the Las Olas Beach Plaza will be designed to reflect Oceanside Plaza Environment and to create a gathering space on the beach to serve as a venue for art in public places Mixed Use and other community related installations Green Roofs The Sebastian/Alhambra Parking Lot, located on the northern edge of the Beach CRA, Observation Deck will provide an opportunity to add parking for the Beach and to create a new park space. CLIENT/CONTACT Redevelopment of the site will also improve the pedestrian experience along Seabreeze City of Ft.Lauderdale Boulevard and Sebastian Street.The six level parking structure could incorporate mixed-use Donald Morris activities,such as beach retail and restaurant space,to further the economic redevelopment 954.828.4517 dmoriss@fortlauderdale.gov of the area as well as provide the needed public restrooms and space for Ocean Rescue Operations. Redevelopment of the site will include exploring opportunities to partner with DURATION developers and landowners. 2012 2012 ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Urban Design,Studies and Analyses 0.A,t.._.._' l;. A - TEAM MEMBERS iiir-` ri'" -" +7 — INVOLVED f\.\'� „,« -- _ Bernard Zyscovich 1 1. ac Suria Yaffar .1 ' . e , _ \ , -- Trenton Baughn tee. ` 1, $1‘E.'�' Thorn Grafton • V+ Manuel del Monte ° j City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 17 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI/CM CRA CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT Miami.FL LITTLE HAITI SOCCER PARK The project included a professional regulation soccer AWARDS Held, a practice field, and a 750-seat grand stand. Other features include a vita course, Little Haiti Cultural Center: 2009 AIA Florida Merit Award tot lot,water play area and a domino park. of Excellence JOSE MARTI PARK GYMNASIUM Zyscovich was hired to design a community KEY FEATURES center and gymnasium facility as a part of Jose Marti Park, located in downtown Miami. Continuing Service Contract The project is a challenging addition due to the small size of the site,which runs underneath Projects an 1-95 overpass, is bisected by a residential Master Planning street and contains major utility hubs feeding Programming _ - �� the City of Miami and Dade County. As a Space Planning "Y` .-'' � unique solution to the site's size constraints and „�,:.' _ q Feasibility Studies I aim, ; .. urban setting,Zyscovich elevated the building Public Use _ to span the street, avoiding the underground Renovation/Expansion i■ ' T. communication cables and water and sewer • • "' lines. This innovative move simultaneously Community Involvement i! , ill,,,t s; saved the City money and created prominence Community Enhancement & for the community center. Redevelopment Design Criteria Packages/ CARIBBEAN MARKETPLACE RENOVATIONS Renovation of the existing Design Guidelines Caribbean Marketplace in Little Haiti. Community Parks LITTLE HAITI CULTURAL CENTER Zyscovich was hired to create a new Little Haiti Sport Facilities&Fields Cultural Campus at the site of the existing Caribbean Marketplace.The new community-use Aquatic Facilities campus maintained the existing Caribbean Marketplace and added two new buildings.The Gymnasiums program includes a 250 seat theater with dance and drama rehearsal halls and a Cultural Concessions Center with an art gallery, arts and crafts workshops, and community meeting rooms.A Offices large open plaza designed to host outdoor community events joins the two new buildings. CLIENT/CONTACT City of Miami CIP/Director Mark Spanioli,PE 305.416.1224 .-- j:,,,,.. " ,ax! , ,;' x . 1 mspanioli®miamigov.corn e;r,, Y y,-...-, '� } Ott a Former City of Miami CIP/ MINIM 4' HDR 111•111 Ir ii Ola O.Oluko i i 786.255.8858 UL-1 ` j�. oduagroup®aol.corn = S ,; t. � '� �` A DURATION A , r t C 1 �- � It /�.. 2005-On-going --v " °`-- ---- ---_� ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY milinit '' s-`' Planning,Programming, Studies and Analyses,A/E Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction ARTHUR E. TEELE COMMUNITY CENTER Zyscovich designed the Arthur E. Administration,Design Criteria Teele Community Center as the second phase to the Little Haiti Soccer Park.This building Professional Services houses the City's local Neighborhood Enhancement Team offices,park offices,restrooms, TEAM MEMBERS a community meeting room and a large multi-purpose room.Additionally,.the project has INVOLVED covered,exterior space designed as complementary event space.The building is sited to Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar allow prominence on the street, while planning for a future connection to a third phase Trenton Baughn activities building and providing direct access to the soccer park amenities. Thorn Grafton Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 18 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications GIBSON PARK PLANNING STUDY&DESIGN GUIDELINES Zyscovich was commissioned to prepare a design criteria report for the renovations to Gibson Park.The project includes the renovation of the baseball field and football field, as well as the addition of a new gymnasium,community center, ........ -..- - events pavilion,and concession stand.To fulfill _ 4,..,,,-,-4.---k p , , the program requirement fora new community -5.:.;:-. = "' `t ' 3 ` - ,-''< , .= center the project includes the adaptive reuse `\\41,:.:" -----'"• 1 . . ° , ? '1 of the existing library building and a new 1] _� ---1 ' "'� ;" --'Y-- -- L• 20,000 SF sports and activities building.The a.-) ° •Q I'I facilities will include a basketball gym,bowling x- %"' .4 3 alley,swimming pool,exercise facilities,weight -._ _1: iv :! - x�` ,, {{�; -, room,and locker rooms. MOORE PARK MASTER PLAN& DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE Zyscovich provided a Conceptual Master Plan and the Design Criteria for Moore Park.This park contains a professional grade tennis center and a football field that is currently undergoing significant upgrades by the Orange Bowl j 0 • Committee. In addition to athletics, this park provides 1 - !:' '�� ;-wwwww academic programs, daycare, and social events services to ' '- 1 the community. Zyscovich conducted a community needs _ 14. _ study with community groups and the Parks Department and 1 ___ ' we ter.... ., .,,• ,_ presented a plan to the neighbors and the City that provides : --°� ' '� I s I �I��'i�wa . �a � � F a new performance space, an outdoor civic plaza with an I , :N :1:�:�� I 4.: :: interactive water feature,a new daycare,and a new educational tt - ,• !'. . . -=n building that will contain classrooms,art spaces,a recording I,► .N " .. studio,a media room,and administrative offices. CHARLES HADLEY PARK PLANNING STUDY,DESIGN GUIDELINES AND CONCESSION BUILDING UPGRADES As a result of the community meetings facilitated by Zyscovich, the first project to be implemented in Hadley Park is the Concession and Fieldhouse Building, Noted by the community as an immediate need due to the success of the Park's existing sports programs,the building was commissioned to Zyscovich under a continuing services contract.The City requested a modified re-use of the recently completed Community Building at the Little Haiti Soccer Park in an effort to expedite the project.Zyscovich re-programmed and re-designed the building and produced 100%construction documents in 6 weeks. The 4600 sf facility contains public restrooms,equipment storage for the baseball and football programs,a field house for team meetings,offices,and a concession stand to serve the adjacent fields.Featured in the building are a large covered "front porch"to encourage gathering and activity around the concession area,outdoor seating,vitacourse access,and additional landscape for shade and screening from the adjacent residential neighborhood. ter--.rte - •_- -.- _T 7Llisigt a - ,,,� ,,. .` +� c �� r.,_ ,,....4t)j.. ,. .-••--� . .. ‘,.. t .,.,,°a=; i -.'-'•' ?� �- . - _.-. —= - ` - {{ 4 . .. . : -___' Elif II L,.- ' *IftLaila.... A-.,--".' ' "I _..f 1 4'.---` , .... .cr , � f -.., - . ,:,.:.... ... f i City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 19 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT(EDP) Miami-Dade County,FL BICENTENNIAL PARK METROMOVER STATION KEY FEATURES Zyscovich was commissioned to prepare the design criteria package for the design build Continuing Service Contract Projects rehabilitation of the Bicentennial Park Metromover Station.In response to the construction of the new Miami Art Museum and Miami Science Museum,the design included the re- Master Planning orientation of the station's face which connected it to Museum Park.A plaza-like atmosphere Existing Conditions Reports highlights the design and joins the station to Museum Drive. In addition, the landscape Design Criteria Professional design was connected to the landscape design proposed for the museums.To create an LEED Certification Studies iconic wayfinding marker from the museums, colored glass replaced the glass within the Re roofing Escalator&Elevator existing elevator tower. The work consisted of an existing conditions report, followed by Replacement the design criteria.The scope of the project included replacing the escalator and elevator, ADA and Safety-to-Life new LED light fixtures, painting, and a new signage package that integrated the station Upgrades with the park.The station has become an integral part of the revitalized Bicentennial Park. Expansion Parking&Service Area Modifications ---------------- Interior Renovations Access __ — - Control Improvements Cost/Benefits Analysis -- c..,, Integration to Existing Concept 1 Operational Sites Integration to Urban Environment CLIENT/CONTACT """" I. Miami Dade County Elizabeth M.Zabowski 305.375.2824 Concept 2 BIBA@miamidade.gov Fernando Marquez PORT OF MIAMI GUARD HOUSE RE-ROOFING 305.755.7847 Construction Documents for the Re-roofing of the Port of Miami Guard House 1-mar@miamidade.gov NORTH GLADE PARK AND LEISURE LAKES PARK LEED STUDY DURATION 2007-0n-going Zyscovich was commissioned to evaluate the Department of Recreation design criteria standards for medium recreational buildings as they relate to sustainable design. The ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY scope of work is to make recommendations on how to achieve LEED Silver Certification Planning,Programming, of various parks building prototypes, particularly the Medium Recreation Building, both Service and Analyses,Design, P 9 P yP P Y g' Services,LEED Design, generically and as relates to two or three actual park sites.The recommendations include a Interior Design.Construction cost/benefits analysis,and some consideration of alterations needed to the project design Administration,Design Criteria guidelines and project delivery methods. Professional Services TEAM MEMBERS INVOLVED Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar xr► , t Thorn Grafton .* Trenton Baughn , i Manuel del Monte �, s* 4,4101: • City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 20 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S II Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications COCONUT GROVE LIBRARY ADA Access&Balcony Expansion,Parking&Service Area Modifications,Interior Design/Interior Renovation&Access Control Improvements The Coconut Grove Branch of Miami-Dade County's library system is a public facility that is both culturally and historically important to the Coconut Grove neighborhood of Miami. The original small library building dating to the early 1900's (left side of rendering) was expanded in 1963 with a tropical vernacular building. This split-level building had not been updated for accessibility since. Zyscovich has completed a program confirmation /feasibility study for accessibility compliance and expansion.This study was accomplished simultaneously with the schematic design phase. The estimated$2 million project was recently approved to move forward toward implementation. The accessibility compliance includes the reconfiguration of ramps and steps, the addition of an elevator inside the existing building,and the expansion of bathrooms.The work will also provide new HVAC,electrical,plumbing and storm drainage.The necessary expansion of floor space will be accomplished primarily under the existing main roof,by partially enclosing the perimeter veranda,yet without losing the visual effect of the wrap-around overhang.This creative approach will allow valuable floor space to be gained,while improving both building maintenance and security.A simple new entry lobby was required(glass element with signage in the rendering).This transparent,inviting volume ties the two existing buildings together with the entry plaza-and inside provides needed reception space while connecting the split levels. The expansion of the building requires the sensitive addition of new glazing at the main reading room and a new entry foyer,both of which are designed as an expression of today's design style and technology,while preserving the identities of the two original volumes.The interiors will be updated and new library technology added.Trees have been preserved and augmented and a new entry plaza and landscaping will return the building to its cultural significance on an important site in Miami's Coconut Grove community. tf. /41L\ l t r ,-...--ir , .. ..„..,,,_, 41.f 0110 , it V 1 II . J "F it Dill 1r ,. - L ' LI , J Z ski' 'r I l. ','1,-:„ il' - , .._ ..„,,,,,, .i .___- , ,. I S Id City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 21 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY(SFRTA) GENERAL PLANNING& ENGINEERING CONTRACT Ft.Lauderdale, FL DOWNTOWN FORT LAUDERDALE WAVE MOBILITY HUB KEY FEATURES The Fort Lauderdale Downtown Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative,a collaborative Continuing Service Contract Projects effort between the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority,the Broward MPO, the City of Fort Lauderdale, FDOT and the South Florida Regional Planning Council, Master Planning needs to identify physical and programmatic requirements and opportunities for a mixed- Visioning use transit hub in the heart of downtown Fort Lauderdale. Programming Site Evaluation&Analysis Mobility Hubs have been defined in the MPO's 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Transit-Oriented Development as transit access points with frequent transit service, high development potential, and a critical point for trip generation or transfers within the transit system. As such, the work Zoning Changes will facilitate the preparation of an RFP for redevelopment of the site via a Public-Private Sustainable Design Partnership and will identify privately funded vertical development opportunities with the Project Phasing facilities and infrastructure improvements required to encourage and emphasize connections Multiple Stakeholder and to multiple modes of transportation,including: Agency Coordination Local/Regional Transportation • Streetcar vehicle maintenance and storage for the WAVE Streetcar and an on-street Analysis streetcar station • Transportation Management Association(TMA)trolley bus storage CLIENT/CONTACT South Florida Regional • Potential connections to Central Broward East-West transit extensions and stations Transportation Authority • Potential connections to FEC commuter rail station Lynda Kompelien Westin, • Pedestrian connectivity to BCT Broward Central Terminal for buses AICP 954.942.7245 • Evaluation of public parking needs at the location 954.9 westinI®sfrtall.gov The scope of work includes the review and documentation of existing development DURATION regulations, master plans, transit Initiatives and planning studies; definition of the 2010-0n-going development approval process and the transit program;and the development of conceptual site plans. Conceptual site plans illustrate the accessibility of transit modes, automobile, ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Programming, bicycle and pedestrian traffic in order to evaluate circulation options and reduce conflicts Studies and Analyses,A/E between travel modes. Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction Administration y �, 'T. a &k"''Fd C-" t_Y` eta Yf i„ ff S. n `, 4 _ �M, L'-,prow, ,. TEAM MEMBERS_AL .. F r T . °-r. INVOLVED '6.i j . o�_, I Bernard Zyscovich r' Ta ■.t`- A -,r; s I_i n"M=I - ! .,.r ✓. Suria Yaffar =, -2 C.41. F: - nip!.N7 7 v i, i - Trenton Baughn _ ', -' Thorn Grafton r 4A ___4 ... 4.r.'at `!K-i"...6'.t i� ' N Manuel del Monte 71. .� � nor- a�...xan,. �� _, 1_. qq = Darys Avila ii r ■: % 134a2r. -LA .:!--'.., IMIr . ,.. ...'•I'''-' l'----. ..-1,41.---1 II"1.4..4M 0 ,' 1 i I i '71,3N +X1'4 -5 , Ir.' I�i . .�:f,-I P I ,- {.l IL;; I � 1.1 I !r �o• a �t lr;�l� i�-.� + 4+ lk ' `. ' ;y 1 — c {_ i-+, l /�,,, _ F � v L: I. :a. If i ,i ,ter IL ..- F City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 22 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications POMPANO BEACH TRI-RAIL STATION KEY FEATURES Zyscovich was commissioned, as a consultant to Kimley-Horn Associates, to prepare Master Planning the architectural design and construction documents For the design-build rehabilitation/ Visioning expansion of the Pompano Beach Tri-Rail Station.The modified prototype project includes Programming new station buildings and an overpass,new platforms to accommodate Tri-Rail and Amtrak LEED Silver train lengths,new canopies for the platform and bus waiting area,and reconfiguration of the Transit Oriented Development parking areas.The project is designed to meet LEED Silver standards and will be submitted Site Evaluation&Analysis for certification.Sustainable strategies incorporated into the project include alternative fuel source parking,a machineroom-less elevator,solar flexlight laminate photovoltaics, LED Solar Flexlight Laminate Photovoltaics lighting,green signage,bicycle lockers,and real time monitoring of energy consumption. The project will receive approximately$5.7 million From the TIGGER III Grant Program Green Signage for solar panels,which will provide for 100%of the energy supply for the facility.Positioned Bicycle Lockers next door to the SFRTA regional offices, the station will become the centerpiece to Tri- Real Time Data Monitoring Rail's updated facilities,showcasing their commitment to a sustainable future. p g Project Phasing Multiple Stakeholder and ...TAPVIRA, — , I> - Agency Coordination I — ,, a LEGEND # ##�#* r "� 1 NEW STATION BUILDING Local/Regional Transportation # _ "' Analysis 2 NEW PLATFORM® Project Fast Tracking to r 3 KISS AND RIDE 4 BUS CANOPY Accelerate Development t,, sale # r -- Schedule ------may=1 - . SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES CLIENT/CONTACT �a�m sa,r ""' —' "'—' 5 PHOTOVOLTAIC LAMINATE Kimley-Horn and Associates ��a��iwnR��PUnwie�u ne.� ��s�����Aw� _ t 6 BICYCLE LOCKERS Gregory S.Kyle,AICP,Vice ® 7 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SOURCE PARKI President Vi � � - - Q' - - ; --- 8 CAR POOL VAN PARKING 954.535.5100 qo i = — greg.kyle®kimley-horn.com j: _ $ 9 SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATIONAL SIC !rte/ a "« a -'� 10 LED LIGHT FIXTURES DURATION 1 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE& 2010-On-going ' + F� �® t _1 MACHINEROOM-LESS ELEVATORS t -3 v ® tit y 12 SHADED PARKING LOT ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY 1 '4 _.. 13 EXISTING WEST PARKING LOT Master Planning,Programming, Studies and Analyses,A/E Services,LEED Design, Interior Design,Construction Administration ilia TEAM MEMBERS �: ■� - , y. INVOLVED VI' i ;i,.-1 F Bernard Zyscovich it Wilt w __ Suria Yaffar s x12 '.,____� a i _ Trenton Baughn 4 � � ;� Thorn Grafton_____ ...“ � .._ ,_ - Darys Avila_ Manuel del Monte......ir,,f'1 smarami4.:, _ + �i • • ' •look. ---„, i I /0/04.i■,-..;..____. 111*0 --...11.-......s. A'1.0, ,,,,, Opp 4 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 23 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI DADE COLLEGE CONTINUING SERVICE CONTRACT: KYRIAKIDES PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS Miami,FL Zyscovich was commissioned to assess the existing condition, prepare a plaza design, KEY FEATURES select paver materials.and improve the plaza sub-base of Kyriakides Plaza at Miami Dade Master Planning& College's Wolfson Campus. The work was needed to correct existing deficiencies and Programming maintenance problems which MDC was experiencing at the plaza.The existing plaza was Space Planning created by closing an existing City of Miami street and paving it with a clay tile paving Mixed-Use system contained by cast in place concrete borders. Urban Design Classrooms&Laboratories Zyscovich arrived at a design solution through a collaborative effort with the client,where design options were explored and the limits of the work were defined. After conducting Faculty&Administrative Offices materials research, Zyscovich and MDC staff selected pavers and colors. The proposed solution incorporates a paving system suitable for heavy vehicle traffic,which occurs during Sustainable Design the annual Miami Book Fair,and provides for suitably placed expansion joints in order to Facility and Feasibility Analysis avoid some of the cracking and chipping attributed to compression in the paver field due Scope and Program Verification to lack of expansion capacity. Preserve Green Spaces and Natural Features The existing pavers had lifted and cracked in many areas,creating ADA and safety issues. Compact Development of the Additionally, they inherently have a poor co-efficient of friction when the plaza is wet. Built Environment The new paving system is more resilient,easier to maintain than the existing system,and Diversity of Uses and Activity resolves the ADA and safety deficiencies. More importantly the design unifies the space Range of Experience between the two existing college buildings and provide a coherent visual field that does Opportunities not resemble an abandoned street. Distinctive,Strong Sense of .,,.e-;,- Place CLIENT/CONTACT F I ' - - - Z...,___TilT 2--__-27.----:' Miami Dade College -_ -41 *Reference to be provided upo n request - DURATION 2010-2011 `""r ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Urban Planning&A/E Services TEAM MEMBERS ' 4000,>> / --" -- -- _ INVOLVED Bernard Zyscovich `/ _ .40-t.,-.:► Suria Yaffar °G��+! i -- _ Thorn Grafton L ' Manuel del Monte . = _� y . , .. O - ._._. ■ I Kyriakides Plaza Design City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 24 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S it Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH URBAN REGULATIONS West Palm Beach,FL Despite its quirky main street and a successful mixed-use shopping center, West Palm AWARDS Beach's traditional downtown had failed to thrive.Competing retail,a weak office district, Florida American Planning Association Award of poor connections to surrounding neighborhoods,a surplus of vacant land,and a code which Excellence,2008 did not work well resulted in a fragmented and under-performing downtown. Zyscovich worked with Lambert Advisory and a City appointed Advisory Board to investigate the KEY FEATURES Urban,Large-Scale,Multi- major planning potentials and to create a new Vision for the downtown's redevelopment. block District Redevelopment The most significant outcomes included: Long Range Fiscal Plan • Linking the two main retail centers with a new business district and creating Extensive Community development incentives to attract Class A office uses Engagement,Public Outreach • Adopting a new zoning code and land use plan based on 13 new neighborhood &Educational Campaigns sub-districts with distinctive characteristics Future Land Use Map • Designing zoning parameters for a range of lot sizes and street types Zoning:Undid Form-based • Developing the zoning mechanism to return a defunct main street into a Zoning Code neighborhood shopping corridor TIF or Innovative Monetary • Enabling adaptive reuse of an industrial district for arts,retail,and residential uses Leveraging The Master Plan includes recommendations and new zoning provisions for the Northwest Policy Recommendations neighborhood,a historic African American neighborhood with many examples of Florida Waterfront Planning and Focus vernacular architecture.The recommendations and new regulations were focused on the on Downtown preservation of the neighborhood for single family uses in the interior and to encourage Visioning Process&Master Planning commercial and multi-family on the perimeter streets. This was accomplished through the preservation of height limits, specific location-based use criteria, recommendations Land Development Regulations for street extensions to improve connectivity,the development of parks and cultural uses, Market Study and Graphic and the protection of area churches through special parking provisions. Depictions of Plans Created New Districts Based on Distinct Characteristics . Created New Land Development Regulations to wInkT A Support District Initiatives . �°. , Developed with the 10' f r r ='�j nfl�+�s+ � - Community for Widespread t� 0' nei8hbalbead { Support 1 '` Designed Development Incentives to Encourage a New . }.' Business District Northwest District �` `` CLIENT/CONTACT i -r _ — .j +' r, City of West Palm Beach I In'; .. ( , Ana Maria Aponte °, ` t _ 561.822.1435 `i _ aaponte@wpb.org 4. .' _ _ __ _ _ — _ DURATION quad Ile I 2005-2009 Northwest Residential Density _;y Flom , Studies . , :°'40• ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Programming, `leaf lake R,g1x Architecture,Feasibility Studies +het,'run, ■ TEAM MEMBERS INVOLVED ''' . Bernard Zyscovich ,..1, • : Suria Yaffar "�'= S^w Trent Baughn Manuel del Monte Clematis Waterfront District Districts Flexibility in Building Darys Avila Massing City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 25 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIDTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN AND ZONING Miami,FL Midtown Miami,likely one of the largest urban infill development projects in the country, AWARDS encompasses a 56-acre site formerly used by the Port of Miami as a storage facility for AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award shipping containers. Identified by Zyscovich as a potential mixed-use district in an early plan for the City of Miami, the firm identified which blocks should contain retail, which APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study • commercial/entertainment and which residential. Developers and Builder's As the site's master planners and master architects, the team partnered with the City of m Advancement nce Co Awards Real Miami's planning department to examine the zoning and land use and to change the land Urbanism Visionary Award use from Industrial to Restricted Commercial.Zyscovich then created two Special District Overlays and Design Guidelines to regulate building form,parking,open space,and uses KEY FEATURES Focus on Downtown organized around a hierarchy of different streets. Master Planning From that point,the neighborhoods within Midtown were further refined.Along the western Land Use/Market Study edge of the site is residential over big box and regional retail. The requirements for the Zoning or Design Guidelines/ residential buildings include service-oriented ground floor retail and internal parking hidden Regulations from the street to further enhance the pedestrian-friendly plan.The northeast portion of Multi-block District the site, known as the Entertainment Block, is planned as an intensely commercial zone Redevelopment created for use by the entire neighborhood and will provide continuous pedestrian activity Created Zoning Overlay and within, and along, its northern edge which abuts the Miami Design District. It includes Design Guidelines two office/showroom buildings with ground floor retail, dining, and shopping that are Long term Visioning separated by a one-acre park,as well as a condominium hotel with abundant corner uses Market Based Solutions and a community theater which will offer cultural activities. Site Evaluation&Analysis Transit-Oriented Development -� Sustainable Design Multiple Stakeholder and I Agency Coordination - - I *..! Redevelopment&Infill • 1 Development in Urbanized 1 . ' 4?Orili --.---1 . Y E Area i II I Vertically Integrated Mixed- .''' 1' Uses Including Office, i Little Haiti Cultural Center Residential and Big Box Retail ",.,.......,_ ,. ',,c ... Street Design �. c"..- Recreation and Open Space Midtown Retail and Residential Street Character a- , CLIENT/CONTACT . li' SamDevelop �_ -- .1._.-1_.,,.','' Deborah Samuel . . - . _ i ,,^ 305.757.0001 (,:; _"` ��"' ! • deborah®samdevelop.com t - g_�_ ? t ,Z-1, ' { - _�-^�.. DURATION ~ .rte._ ---, -. .�, 1'i- --t.. 2004-2007 V 'N !� _+ ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY ';M � - Master Planning,Programming, i ,' Fir--4 `1" •.-ZT r■ `4' , _ Architecture,Feasibility Studies lc 1 „.^ TEAM MEMBERS 4 "a " �1 4 I i INVOLVED 1�:�:.. Zyscovich Bernard Zys .." _.,,�. }'., ,,- - _ Suria Yaffar ..-__1;_-. , == --. -_ _ -- ----- = — —. ,-- Grace Perdomo , ,j fir —Q � - Trent Baughn Midtown Master Plan Proposed Special Districts Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 26 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & UPDATE Miami Beach,FL In the early 1990s,South Miami Beach was in desperate need of investment ,-- AWARDS and creativity.What began as negotiations between a grassroots APA Florida Gold Coast /- ,/t -, Section 2003 Outstanding community group seeking to preserve a small group of j�►� J;', , i Urban Design Study 1950s hotels and the City's Mayor who wanted to -'� ��=`.• �`'j'_ { �� �a APA Florida Gold Coast develop a convention hotel on publicly:red n ,C Section 2001 Planning Award land,launched this small district into one ! . for Outstanding Architectural �� u Project,Convention Center the more popular tourist markets in the „z;,- f world. As part of the team developing !'� � Hotel Complex 16th Street r Zyscovich prepared r -.1_._1 :-...04.4 -,---�^+ APA Florida Gold Coast the hotel project, ys p p 9.-.., . ,- , . "i� 1 Section 2001 Planning Award the district's master plan and CRA plan. e`�` i°-, ,----"" -.—, �,�j� For Outstanding Historical Mit kris Imo"-" t,: u!_ ,--' ?-7-77t- Renovation Project,St.Moritz '111:71:(71' AIA Miami 1999 Honor Award s��+1, �1 of Excellence in Urban Design Master Plan Drawing for ( _ is the Convention Center I FAPA Gold Coast Section 14- - 2001 Planning Award For District 11 ^T Outstanding Historical Renovation Project """" • APA 2001 Planning Award 0/0 ' - Ill 9• • I- for Outstanding Architectural if •/ i ■ - • I Project /0/ • •, •�a• ■ . ■ r. o•0 , - nil■ ' • KEY FEATURES ri •/0 I — — — .,.-_.. _._ Identified Improvements as nt is r I Catalysts for Redevelopment o. ,, -I `° ----- '• . -- Established the Mechanism :�ic7cii:m �.r\� I LIQUORS ""'� '�.° "' _ to Fund these Improvements r ,•_ through the CRA I k I Public-Private Partnership ——4} Master Planning&Urban Design Site Planning,Platting,Urban Condition of South Beach Convention Center District before Construction Block Creation,Zoning& Regulations Land Use Planning II ,0 t s - Economic Redevelopment Air • 1**,4Revenue Generation i N r �' i Public and Private Financing !lit ' � Mn •tire► ,I II I�„ , r ■..,.J4. Attracting and Securing - •'mo B•- '. _' Developers _R. , •z•'•[ •r 11 i. ',, - ,�w'• •W" ��..-. is Development Phasing irit•Ir• • T" se" la ` Tr';'.•Tr . fli ,MITT Sr ' r-I --TI • _ ;. is Programming • n • Ii �� • �� `' ini. i .� Iconic Design . . ;rill K iti lino j * i i Destination Place Making t :��.,,,,,,,....r l 4 rr Multiple Stakeholder,Agency, `,. t `it l. Jurisdictional Consensus& r • Approvals , . ,- 4, •?ti r Mixed-Use Development _- ±� .— --_ i Trade&Tourism �,, s�'' '-` Waterfront Development ice , ' After Construction Images:Loews Hotel Complex,Anchor Shops and 16th Street City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z YS C O V I C H 27 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"A s Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications Ten years later,Zyscovich was hired to update the master plan.These three efforts together Multimodal,TOD&Parking played a major role in revitalizing South Beach with the following outcomes: Planning and Design Retail&Commercial • Construction of the Loews Hotel convention center complex and specifically design Hotels&Restaurants of the St. Moritz Hotel and Anchor Shops with structured parking Exhibit&Conference Space • Design of the 16th Street roadway extension to connect with the convention hotel • Revitalization of the eastern end of Lincoln Road Business Service Center Spaces &Open Green aces • Design and construction of the Lincoln Cinema to anchor the western end of P p Lincoln Road Pedestrian Connectivity& • A renewed cultural campus including a Regional Library, Ballet Center, and Wayfinding renovated art museum Sustainability/LEED Planning • Master plan for soundscape park framed by an expanded New World Symphony &Design building and Wallcast Contextually Appropriate Design CLIENT/CONTACT City of Miami Beach/Miami Beach CRA �; Former Redevelopment ' " ' Coordinator ;... A ' i a : ' Kent Bonde` -1, ' —' `Reference to be provided i noo>a�awcr. R� 7 sr1 s, .,. . 4 upon request i _ -,... ` re DURATION a ate, �� �,����:€;..�,..�.w�. �� "---16'.- ,j� _ Master Plan:1993 �. .. ,.�.� ..- . .w. : Plan Update:2003 ill. _�. •g-;:-.... p ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY ,•� II t=1 - o WS I •• .. ? , Urban Design,Visioning, , Master Planning, , 1,. ,r Programming,Community and . .r as y Stakeholder Outreach C'f $, "-- '' ..- 1 TEAM MEMBERS j ,: t-. INVOLVED i _ WASHINGTON AVENUE A Bernard Zyscovich Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan Update Trent Baughn ...,, �llilllll 1' _ A - / i f r,'�„WI irk nil, _ ""'i.0 f jvry y ljAlif I S \ r ' r ' - to -"I' AI( • .4'Ni A' .-' -\--0 i 4$ _....--,_ .. et New World Symphony Wallcast Lincoln Road Pedestrian Mall _',. • • • , ..--: I,l'A to mit* - ' Pr'14 '.::'i ''' ' • t. • .1. -- . • IliF - .;% t,,.r. ;I • 't i 0 1 ,X,: a _..: '.. .r Ryin" :.i Lincoln Cinema Miami City Ballet by Arquitectonica City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 28 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications NEW ORLEANS NEIGHBORHOOD (POST KATRINA) REBUILDING PLAN New Orleans, LA Zyscovich was commissioned by the City Council of the City of New Orleans as part KEY FEATURES of Lambert Advisory's design team to prepare a reconstruction plan for five of 49 Community Redevelopment neighborhoods adjacent to the French Quarter. The three primary goals of the plan are Long Range Fiscal Plan to prioritize a broad range of community projects among historically divided neighborhoods, Extensive Community return a sense of normalcy as quickly as possible,and to create a plan that addresses the Engagement,Public Outreach overall deterioration which pre-existed Katrina.The final plan will be the basis for the receipt &Educational Campaigns of Federal funding and was a result of an intensive public involvement effort. Visioning Process Audit of Land Use and The final plan included the following elements: Programs Highest and Best Use Analysis • Methodologies for enhancing local neighborhood pride while transcending the Future Land Use Map differences to achieve shared opportunities • Identifying key corridors between neighborhoods to create a place where the Capital Projects and/or Programs Priorities List communities can come together for new social and commercial use • Creating networks that tie into the tourist economy Implementation Program • Creating a dialogue with the community through public meetings and committees TIF or Innovative Monetary • Leveraging Communication strategies Historic Preservation Urban,Large-Scale,Multi- block District Redevelopment Community-based Plans Land Use/Market Study Neighborhood Planning Created an Implementation t, n ' Strategy with Funding Priorities• .-4,7 0 , - .-14,- -. �31r 4 - Public and Private Financing i ' z ST BERNARD AREA;PROJFt'>• „_ Land Use Planning • ' '� i ' ! Recommendations i ' d ; f w Redevelopment Plan Approval I' , Process Proposed view of Moss Street in the Fauborg St.John neighborhood; Strategic and Action Plans `. Proposed View of a Key Corridor Along I-io/Claiborne Corridor Strategies for New Residential 4t ^a. NEIGHBORHOODS REBUILDING PLAN Development and Housing ssdE"r'' ._ ST BERNARD AREA IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY MATRIX Assistance e8 CLIENT/ FT NTAC �� �,� r Lambert tREME i Earty Action Plan 1.,APIT1E capital Prp;ects plambert@lambertadvisory.com Streets-sidewalks street lighting • • 5•,0C,HOC storm drainage-repair reconstruct Landscape rehab;replacement- DURATION .00 C 00i,ROW 8 neutral grounds • 2006-2006 Re-open Methodist Eiderty Care lankly-improve open plaza on St • • • T@� Bernard Ave Neighborhoods Aerial Subtotal:Capital Projects 1 316.200,000 ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Ma Tenn Plan CaoitalProlecta Planning,Urban Add marked biryde lanes on key 2 • • $30,000 • roadways where space permits Design,V i s i o n i n g ,� a ,.�!a�'a InsiAl 1610 Acoustical buffering Y • • $2,000,000 `Z .�,, Rehabilitate Union Baptist •a '. ° t'441.4.,._r Theological Seminary or new use for z . • r-• TEAM M E M B E RS•'"'�Oli property • ,- Subtotal:Capital Projects $2,030,000 INVOLVED Houelno IniSatNea and Other ` r Psli Bernard Zyscovich A Reinforce small scale commercial across front a Bernard housing Suria Yaffar '� . _ development ""..::,.; Long Tern,Plan Grace Perdomo Capital Projects .d Subtotal:Capital Projects I ( i _ Trenton Baughn Proposed"Heart of 7th Ward" Thorn Grafton ` P f Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 29 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications ALL ABOARD FLORIDA Miami/Fort Lauderdale/West Palm Beach/Orlando, FL Zyscovich Architects,in association with Skidmore,Owings&Merrill(SOM),are serving KEY FEATURES as co-architects of record for this privately owned,operated and maintained passenger rail Local/Regional Transportation system in the United States. When completed, it will become of the highest speed train Analysis routes in the country. Existing Conditions Report Multiple Stakeholder and Elevating the railroad tracks 50 feet into the air along the dense, linear site in the core of Agency Coordination downtown Miami will allow traffic to flow freely underneath.The elevated tracks will also Programming create room for two layers of valuable,glass-encased retail space at the street level,where Site Evaluation&Analysis pedestrians pass by. Lightweight perforated panels will lie intermediately in the open webs Master Planning of the traversing V-shaped exoskeleton that enclose the railroad tracks and will allow for Design Criteria Package glimpses of the moving train.The entire project will feel industrial,yet will be transparent and airy. Project Phasing Sustainable Design The scope of work includes the support services necessary for the operation and safety $treetscape Improvements of the high-speed rail system, including boarding platforms, stairs, elevators, escalators, Transit Oriented Development walkways,waiting areas,ticket and information booths,luggage handling areas,restrooms, (TOD) utility rooms, station advertising displays, concessions, restaurants, lounges and other service-related businesses that will be open to passengers and nearby residents. Included CLIENT/CONTACT All Aboard Florida the long-term master plan are parking structures and rental car facilities,bikeways,pocket Eric Claussen parks,community gardens,playgrounds,power substations,and other uses necessary for 305.520.2115 the operation,maintenance,and future growth of the All Aboard Florida intermodal transit Eric.Claussen@allaboardflorida. oriented development. COm DURATION 2013-2016 r� ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Visioning, 1 r - , Entitlements,Programming, Re-Zoning,Site Evaluation t � 4 `r , q ; _ r &Analysis,Architectural& Interior Design,Phasing, , � Sustainable Design a * ' } ... �r" . TEAM MEMBERS t !� . .-_ _ INVOLVED IV ■r ..';Jt z.;; Opt, �" Bernard Zyscovich ^1��� Suria Yaffar Grace Perdomo Trenton Baughn �, Thorn Grafton ' " ' 'r-.,* ' Manuel del Monte *,. / Darys Avila do* , i ■ .. Irk- - .‘,-, - , ' - %%0%, .\.,, • * *.e.' N ;R ;. tom' City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 30 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI OMNI AREA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & UPDATE Miami,FL Zyscovich was hired by the City of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency to update KEY FEATURES the Omni neighborhood redevelopment plan.This included a thorough analysis of existing Community Redevelopment infrastructure,urban form,economics,and housing to form design recommendations and Long Range Fiscal Plan redevelopment opportunities. Community Engagement Public Outreach&Educational In addition to the creation of a redevelopment plan report,Zyscovich produced an analysis Campaigns of existing conditions. The report outlines over 20 strategies and projects to promote a Visioning Process and Master cohesive redevelopment plan for the area. Planning The plan was updated in 2009 and adopted by the Miami Dade County Commission in Audit of Land Use and Programs January of 2010. Highest and Best Use Analysis Market Study&Future Land Use Map Zoning&Design Guidelines/ Regulations to Protect Neighborhoods and Special Areas f1 1 _J t 1 Overall Vision Diagram ' ---1±,— Capital Projects and/or 1,_____ _._ ..-a2 — 1. Improved Programs Priorities List 1 t .pnr•� �. Connectivity Al y !i',,slim.iM 'L y TIF,Innovative Monetary i'� ,r 2. Omni Mall ethir j 1, .l I ■ ` Leveraging.Alternative �' ��� ;' R: :; t develn Funding&Public Private 1 Mt >�' i "`= _ f j. 3. Mimi Financing M'11t lJ 'R '.. ..,j--.../1 \I and Surrounding Facilitated Financial Plan !ii 1 i i s Properties ► 11 .; Redevelopment Attracting and Securing .1 ��� U g Developers &silo- . 4. Performing Arts •" {+" ' t_.,.Zs t •® Waterfront Planning•ii; f '• i c,..�. I fi( i Center t i Slum&Blight Analysis and 1 --4� , ♦Wit;—# 1—. 'Q' �— t 5. Area Capture Parking ■ I -� � Find ing of Necessity IF `0 it i g, I 1 i C ' 6. Media/Entertainment y ' t— Service Delivery(Public Safety -� i�-+�-�, •-- y��� zrnAll t District and Utilities) ■d ar i-aISi'l�0, �i � k u 7. Baywalk Growth Management and �`�`� �` �`' * Smart Growth Initiatives ---1. v + �' 11" R- \- 8. Streetscapes � � � � _ O �, _ 9. Historic Preservation Urban&Environmental ,► ,4,�p ••►r' 0 Standards 0;1.i-dap. `'1`_ 10. Neighborhood to lib. " i►717' f. _-, _ Greenspace CLIENT/CONTACT d W', ' 11. Variety of Housing Omni Redevelopment District �•� i CRA 12. Neighborhood School Frank Rollason(retired) N' I' `�LV —' , '4'b / .4.1` 305.299.7300., ..a * ^`a �� �� X DURATION Ilk A .r► 1 _ �' „ 4 J. ;iI1 -i -jl ', ! ti; r` 2004-2007 ,- .; _- _f ? `.' � ;:!l •. . . Adopted:2009 ,. ;, i al,.l�{14 �,'�;. Amended City Commission: `` "5 k , , : \�a 4i1' VE�Ik - A 2010 '�' :- ` � y �` "," II 4 ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY ahn �{ 1....f %;/ .1.9i �. . ill 1). li 0lM6 -/= - 'it `''sii .�\�_ '"i Master Planning,Streetcape i y r_ 7---_ s� - _ --, � , ti I �e 11 Design,Programming,• ,�>` ?, 444 M . �� _/ lw„, 1i ► *.• ." , ? ��I' TEAM MEMBERS s ' h'' ` INVOLVED _ ... we jiC UM Bernard Zyscovich Suria Yaffar Trent Baughn Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 31 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications PLAN Z FOR MIAMI Miami,FL Architect and cycling enthusiast Bernard Zyscovich has a plan to turn Miami's Rickenbacker KEY FEATURES Causeway into a"scenic road through a park."The idea originated after the cycling death Feasibility Study of Aaron Cohen along this same stretch of roadway.The proposed plan, known in social Site Evaluation&Analysis media circles as#PlanZforMiami, complies with the Miami-Dade Parks, Recreation and Programming Open Space Master Plan and was approved by the Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Urban Fabric Revitalization Organization's Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Streetscape Improvements By downgrading the functional classification of Rickenbacker Causeway to enable an Human-Scale alternate roadway design standard, i.e. Principle Arterial to Minor Arterial, a new design Design Standard strategy for the causeway could be implemented.Zyscovich's plan would formally convert Implementation Rickenbacker Causeway into Rickenbacker Park. One of three vehicular lanes would be Local Transportation Analysis removed,providing two vehicular lanes in each direction from the mainland to the entrance Existing Conditions Report to the Village of Key Biscayne.The newly liberated space would be used to expand bicycle Multiple Stakeholder and and pedestrian facilities.Landscaped medians planted with shade trees and native species Agency Coordination would separate vehicle lanes from bike and pedestrian paths. Design Criteria Package Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) CLIENT/CONTACT No Zyscovich Architects-ProBono is} tom-- Bernard Zyscovich T J ..r.... F i; 305.372.5222 bernard®zyscovich.com DURATION s, ,,,� V I 2012-On-going .�•_ ` *` "4.• ail; ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY a Visioning,Urban Design, Current View Feasibility Studies and Planning • TEAM MEMBERS „"r < -- .> INVOLVED Si l Bernard Zyscovich ti; Suria Yaffar 7 j , 1 +E Grace Perdomo Trenton Baughn , .41:00... . , - i Thorn Grafton `s Darys Avila 4 it-,,,, . d1/4 , : . r -- .` i t • ( 1 #A" - '''. 4 A)„ ,.-,,„ ,,.... . .fr n T l Rendering of After View City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 32 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DOWNTOWN HOLLYWOOD (YOUNG CIRCLE) CRA MASTER PLAN &UPDATE Hollywood,FL Amidst a burgeoning real estate boom,the City of Hollywood found itself unequipped to KEY FEATURES negotiate development agreements with three different downtown developers for lack of a Community Redevelopment clear vision and plan.While the City was designing a new Arts Park in the impressive 900 foot Long Range Fiscal Plan diameter Historic Young Circle traffic circle,no plan existed for the buildings surrounding Community Engagement the park,the streetscape,the transit line or the historic retail corridor.The ensuing vision Public Outreach&Educational provided a more bold downtown which used the park as its focal point to synthesize and Campaigns enhance energies between the retail areas across the street and those within the Circle.New Visioning Process and Master buildings must follow the curve of the Circle to frame the space and concentrate height Planning along the main street,away from the adjacent residential neighborhoods.Additional zoning Audit of Land Use and recommendations for the commercial corridors included increased height and density Programs within a half mile radius of the downtown.Six years later in 2009,the City hired our firm to Highest and Best Use Analysis translate the plan into a zoning code and update the plan.Working in conjunction with our Future Land Use Map economist to assess the economic situation and identify and redevelopment opportunities, Zoning or Design Guidelines/ we developed goals and objectives which enable the City,property owners,and residents Regulations to make informed strategic decisions about future development and public improvements. Capital Projects and/or Programs Priorities List In addition to numerous stakeholder workshops and community presentations,the revised TIF or Innovative Monetary master plan resulted in the following outcomes: Leveraging • Incentives for historic preservation and infill development. Policy Recommendations • Historic and Conservation Districts to protect the existing character. Focus on Downtown • Sites and programs for potential public/private partnerships and pilot projects. Land Development Regulations • Zoning Regulations and Standards to reinforce district character and sense of place. Land Use/Market Study Multi-block District _ — Redevelopment - „'rte I '6 - Graphic Depictions of Plans _.!'-'77,-, T 0iilYet`:.: ..ter` _'6er _, ' --° y --'_ .1",m Community Involvement ''... Roadway Improvements Public Realm Improvements Parking Strategies j - .. -'.. - 1 CRA Zone ":" "_ -'' "r \ Arts and Cultural Uses Before Pedestrian Connectivity Coastal Community CLIENT/CONTACT City of Hollywood CRA �. *,-_. ... '� Jaye Epstein , ,„„,pizo 954.921.3471 t`_ jepstein@hollywoodfl.org 'N� — .� DURATION 2008-2010 After ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY Master Planning,Urban ❑ Mixed Use Design,Studies and Analyses Retail Core a Dixie Highway U Young Circle TEAM MEMBERS • North Downtown ® North Parkside Offiet/Mix•d-Us• � INVOLVED Federal Highway District eera g y i ❑ Golf ❑ Transition to Lakes Bernard Zyscovich H'-'I Suria Yaffar Master Plan Trent Baughn Manuel del Monte City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 33 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications HOLLYWOOD BEACH CRA VISION AND ZONING MASTER PLAN Hollywood,FL Zyscovich created a new Vision and Zoning Master Plan for the Hollywood Beach CRA AWARDS by focusing on strategies to preserve its historic buildings, finding solutions for FEMA's AMIA Florida 2007,Unbuilt erit Award building requirements, upgrading the quality of the public realm, and supporting new development which is compatible with the existing building fabric. KEY FEATURES Community Redevelopment The plan established the Boardwalk as the premiere bicycling destination in Florida; Long Range Fiscal Plan created a new historic district, recommended a multi-use trail link at Hollywood Beach Community Engagement, Boulevard; created a Beach Walk and Park in South Central Beach;created a Boardwalk Public Outreach&Educational along the Intracoastal Waterway;and implemented environmentally friendly streetscape. Campaigns It also included a new zoning code to incorporate the realities of the development climate, Visioning Process the limitations of the parcels,and flood zone requirements,as well as a"green framework" Audit of Land Use and with potential funding sources for nature-based recreation. Programs Highest and Best Use Analysis Future Land Use Map • ` F Capital Projects and/or 1 Programs Priorities List erg r -t1 r - I TIF or Innovative Monetary �-> 50'Max Height 1111t. - Leveraging Preserves views fr• t,,s -.„fs'!'4 , "' a existing buildings "'"'��- $ Waterfront Planning - 3 Urban,Large-Scale, -* , w E.......! *; Multi block District '> �'^ a Redevelopment [� ft, Site Planning,Platting,Urban Block Creation,Zoning& , y Regulations Landscape buffer protects` ,m+,. .-i public character of beach „ "� r l.- y # y and provides beachacue \ , ". * •� Development Phasing for oceanfront properties - $ Destination Place Making 4 . + Multimodal,TOD&Parking Boardwalk Extansiorr�� t I Planning and Design Beachy Transit Loop • I Pedestrian Connectivity& b Wayfinding Proposed Massing Historic Preservation Maintain side setbacks to protect views to beach and public access for all residents and visitors CONTACT CLIENT City of Hollywood CRA l Jaye Epstein,Director sac �a as " t, a 01'1 c 954.921.3471 �. I i jepstein@hollywoodfl.org aaa an a a� . ..-a1 DURATION f 2005-2007 i we Ifa r 1 ' ROLE/RESPONSIBILITY •. 4 '3 : Master Planning,Zoning& el ...--- Urban Design .1 ./tAlisil /11,0 TEAM MEMBERS ,s I __ : INVOLVED 40, ;: -+� °''`" "` Bernard Zyscovich { f Suria Yaffar &Ilk ' i I illiy .. 1-, - Trenton Baughn Thorn Grafton -- Manuel del Monte Boardwalk Circulation Plan City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 34 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications PERSONNEL Zyscovich is a large planning and architecture firm, employing over 90 = i ''` �`` ;�; professionals with vast experience and technical expertise.The planners,urban - designers and architects proposed for this project have extensive experience A-P�"' ►-,, in visioning, urban design, master plan updates, land use, redevelopment '• . ; improvements, economic development and rehabilitation, contemporary - ' J' planning codes,and capital project planning,prioritization and implementation, ` as well as regulating plans for multi-modal transportation and storm water '' �• ' infrastructure for municipalities throughout the country.This team has worked � ± j�: together on a number of similar projects, the majority of which have been ,.r•._ r.-_- '<=.. - 9 P 1 1 Y rr `r---�- ._ implemented.Their expertise includes community workshops,education and t.• 1. engagement, and presenting reports and information to elected officials, ;f stakeholders and the community. Our vast experience in both private and public sector planning and the ? � �a -T_ importance of market feasibility help to ensure that our plans can be realized. For over 37 years, our firm has developed creative solutions to stimulate and '• r � ,;" ..: , implement high quality redevelopment while protecting neighborhoods.We - _ �.- j = '. + have been recognized for this level of dedication and expertise in planning by the American Planning Association and the American Institute of Architects ire' : s —.7_ . and will bring this energy to the City of Miami Beach.The staff assigned will ;r78 + be with the projects from their inception through their successful completion. »� �' = : Additional staff can and will be assigned as necessary to meet the budget, "��-- schedule and objectives of the projects.The following pages contain resumes Midtown Miami:Existing Conditions, for our key personnel as follows: Implementation(2007)&Proposed Build-out BERNARD ZYSCOVICH, FAIA, Principal-in-Charge, will have overall responsibility and accountability for the performance of the entire Zyscovich team, including any required sub-consultants, which will be selected based on a specific project's scop with approval by the City of Miami Beach. He will ensure that the team is staffed correctly and adequately. SURIA YAFFAR,ASSOC.AIA, LEED AP,Principal and Director of Design,will help lead the urban design effort to successfully achieve the vision and design requirements. TRENTON BAUGHN, RA,AICP, LEED AP, Director of Urban Design and Project Manager,will be responsible for the management of the project and the day-to-day communication between all team members. GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA, Sr. Urban Designer, will work closely with the Project Manager to provide planning services involving visioning, redevelopment, design guideline/code development, community engagement and zoning analysis. THORN GRAFTON,AIA, LEED AP, Historic Preservation Architect and Director of Sustainable Initiatives, will bring his knowledge and expertise in the areas of historic preservation and sustainable design to the projects. MANUEL DEL MONTE,Sr. Urban Designer,will provide support for the urban design services involving visioning, programming,conceptual design,design guideline development and zoning analysis. DARYS AVILA,Jr.Urban Designer and Graphics Specialist,will serve as support staff and will create graphic diagrams. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYSCOVICH 35 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Zyscovich, Inc. Master Planning, Programming, MIAMI B LEED Design, Urban Design,Sustainable Design,Urban &Historic Preservation Bernard Zyscovich,FAIA Principal-in-Charge Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA,LEED AP Director of Design Trent Baughn,RA,AICP,LEED AP Director of Urban Design;Project Manager Grace Perdomo,Assoc.AIA Sr. Urban Designer Manuel del Monte Sr. Urban Designer Thorn Grafton,AIA,LEED AP Director of Sustainable Initiatives Darys Avila Jr.Urban Designer SUBCONSULTANTS As Necessary City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 36 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications BERNARD ZYSCOVICH, FAR Principal-in-Charge Bernard Zyscovich is the founder of Zyscovich Architects and serves as its Managing EDUCATION Principal. With over 40 years experience, he has led creative teams on a wide range of Bachelor of Architecture Pratt Institute 1971 projects from the urban planning of major U.S.cities to the architectural design of high-rise residential, mixed-use, retail, and commercial buildings. As the visionary on many high- Special Study in Urban Design Universita'Di Architettura profile projects, Bernard draws upon his extensive work with multiple stakeholders and Venice,Italy 1969 broad-based public input to create implementable redevelopment plans that are embraced by the community,stakeholders,developers and elected officials. REGISTRATIONS Registered Architect in: Florida#AR0007410 Bernard brings to each of the firm's projects an instinctive understanding of architectural context and the connection to the surrounding environment as a result of his years analyzing New York#030993-1 the massing,forms and features of the urban fabric.This holistic approach allows our projects New Jersey#21A101705600 to enjoy a continuity with the essential aspects of the environment while establishing a Pennsylvania#RA403495 new,integrated expression of that uniqueness of the place. North Carolina#11384 RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Georgia#RA012504 • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract Tennessee#103991 • Downtown Fort Lauderdale Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative Illinois#1.018009 • City of Miami/City of Miami CRA Continuing Service Contract NCARB Certification#26130 • Miami-Dade County Architectural Services(EDP) Continuing Service Contract • South Florida Regional Transit Authority(SFRTA)Continuing Service Contract PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Miami Dade College Continuing Service Contract Fellow of the American • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update Institute of Architects(FAIA) • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning Member of the American • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan & Update Planning Association(APA) • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Member of the Urban Land • All Aboard Florida Master Planning and Station/TOD Design Institute • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan&Update PUBLICATIONS/ • Plan Z for Miami SPEAKING • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update ENGAGEMENTS • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Getting Real About Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning Urbanism,Urban • g Institutee,, 200 October 2008 • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan Numerous Publications in • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan National Journals including Architectural Digest,Interior i { i Design and Architecture,Urban W ^ � j c z1""---''''. �,�',.`, ........•...--x ., ,,,,,•..,, x r -'E Land Magazine and Multifamily :-' - �i rya w� � ? ., p 3 ?_ '11 c:' tv,A ' t d '�. �,.,� `- Housing f- r _ i ULI YLG Author Series: A 3 �I Conversation with Bernard t '}.� 4 , '"`a '* °"�°R J T Zyscovich about Real-,--.:',: •-= 'li I s i°f ,J. . j' .., - ,«,moo- - _ NY 3 Urbanism,New York,N•t t k v '' z .r Meeting of the Minds,A " f —-- � Sustainable Cities Leadership r_.� _ Summit:Planning and Keeping i ,r;`° i, j ...41t Personality in Place,New York, - r ,- NY 7.7 i r - CIub.S•uare Entertainment District American Institute of t V A. '.. Architects'Large Firm • Roundtable,Real Urbanism', t `� `a` Philadelphia,PA ..� . ,Market Square,''Lafayette ' a �r � :,� . Universita Frederico Segundo.. ,„ µ., Di •T . , Theories of Design and 11 Urbanism.Naples,Italy Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Pillars of the Industry National Assn.of Home Builders, City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 37 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications SURIA YAFFAR,ASSOC.AIA, LEED AP Principal;Director of Design Suria Yaffar is a firm principal and the Director of Design.Suria has worked on a variety of EDUCATION planning,urban design and architectural projects for public and private clients throughout Master of Architecture the United States. She is experienced in all phases of the planning process including Princeton University 1990 community outreach,consensus building,strategic planning and urban design,as well as all Bachelor of Architecture University of Miami 1987 phases of land development.Suria collaborates with Bernard Zyscovich on the firm's most significant commissions.Suria has served on regional ULI Advisory boards and conducted REGISTRATIONS university lectures on master planning and architecture and her work has been published LEED Accredited Professional in the ACSA Journal. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Associate Member of • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract the American Institute of • City of Fort Lauderdale Continuing Service Contract Architects • Miami-Dade County(EDP)Continuing Service Contract Member of the Urban Land • South Florida Regional Transit Authority(SFRTA)Continuing Service Contract Institute • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update PUBLICATIONS/ • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan& Update Published in the ACSA Journal • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan & Update Lecturer on the Faculty of Architecture at the University • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle) CRA Master Plan Update of Miami and Florida • Peary Court, Key West Master Plan&Architecture International University • Higgs Beach Master Plan Lectures Nationally on Issues 1 • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning of Architecture and Urban • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan Planning • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan "Capacity-based Regulation vs. Form-based Regulation:A New • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan Vision for West Palm Beach"at • Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study the 2008 Annual Conference • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan of the American Association of • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan Urban Planning "Lessons Learned in Hollywood Beach"at the 2006 Annual f ' - Y Conference of the American ' Association of Urban Planning BERNARD j( 'f . ■ .,� 'a•�r' `3 g AREA r PROJECT ~ ri` 4 z_.,��j �' , ", Technical Assistance Program 4 ,!r ,prw * of the Council of the Southern `, 1 J District of Florida and the Caribbean Institute of "` i �I t,',/,,A,. Territorial Development .,. >` ' if "Real Urbanism"Keynote of the ,..,r_. !h -�. 2008 Symposium"Revisiting the Redevelopment Plan," Public Investment Center of Florida Atlantic University , it •,. AWARDS low r Urban Designer of the Year ._`"�r�_ 2008,American Institute of ..._.�z Architects,Miami Chapter f W 1 q SIXTH WARD! ' ^�' a» q TREME J LAFITTE ,' l��'��, ,,,,, Proposed Views of Infill Housing - _.-,�. r_rte i• New Orleans(Post Katrina)Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans:Neighborhood Aerial City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG Z Y S C O V I C H 38 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S • Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications TRENT BAUGHN, RA,AICP, LEED AP Director of Urban Design;Project Manager As the Director of Urban Design,Trent Baughn has worked on a variety of urban design, EDUCATION planning and architectural design projects for the public sector.Many of his projects include Master of Architecture University of Florida 1996 zoning analysis, code development and writing, and design guidelines, often involving close coordination with economists.He has developed the expertise required to create and Bachelor of Science in Architectural Engineering maintain close working relationships with governing municipal agencies. Trent authored Technology the first sustainable design code in Florida for the City of Coconut Creek. He also served University of Southern as senior design manager for the Miami Intermodal Center and Rental Car Facility with Mississippi 1992 a former employer where he established successful working relationships with a variety REGISTRATION of public agencies including the Florida Department of Transportation and Miami-Dade Florida Architect#AR 95131 Aviation Department. Trent was also a member of the design team for the Downtown American Institute of Certified Orlando Intermodal Center. Planners#019084 LEED Accredited Professional RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: • City of Miami Beach/CMB CRA Continuing Service Contract PROFESSIONAL • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update AFFILIATIONS Member the American g Planning A • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning s Association(APA) • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan& Update Member of the Transportation • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Aesthetics Review Committee • All Aboard Florida Master Planning and Station/TOD Design (TARO),a sub-committee • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan& Update of the Miami-Dade County Downtown Hollywood(Young Circe CRA Master Plan Update Metropolitan Planning • D Hll d\Y Y g l ) P Organization(MPO) • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element • City of Jacksonville Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan • Downtown Fort Lauderdale Mobility Hub Joint Development Initiative • City of Coconut Creek Mainstreet Vision and Master Plan '`� - � j+�.l 'i'�c ✓ _• irate �. 4 i 4 r • 't f' -qjy4, 'k ��' .��,^i, �• F��: .W 1 --0" •,�i .,•R..a,'tY ? '••••'eie' '47,4tiv • : al 17 4.401'" Gard City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 39 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA Senior Urban Designer Grace Perdomo is an architectural and urban designer with more than 15 years of extensive EDUCATION mixed-use,urban redevelopment,master planning and grant writing experience.As Senior Master of Architecture in Urban Design Urban Designer at Zyscovich Architects,Grace is committed to sustainable urbanism and University of Miami,1991 has overseen a diverse group of projects centered on downtown and historic neighborhoods Bachelor of Architecture with a focus on community revitalization and mixed-use infill development.She has assisted Universidad Nacional Pedro numerous public and private sector clients in the design and implementation of sustainable Henriquez Urena,Santo policies,practices,plans and design guidelines that improve and integrate density, multi- Domingo.Dominican Republic, 1987 modal transportation,preservation,land use and development to create livable,walkable and diverse communities. Associate in Arts Miami Dade Community College,1981 Working collaboratively in focused multidisciplinary teams and at varying scales—regional, community, downtown urban district and site-specific—Grace's expertise in visioning, PROFESSIONAL integrated planning and urban design has created feasible, desirable and sustainable AFFILIATIONS Associate Member of change in numerous communities across the country. Skilled in translating the principles the American Institute of of new urbanism into pragmatic planning and design solutions for developments in both Architects(AIA)and Congress the public and private sectors, Grace's use of innovative participatory processes and for New Urbanism design tools engage public participants as active decision-makers in visioning, planning FIU Landscape Architecture and community building.Her strengths include grant writing,planning and urban design, Advisory Board. community facilitation and consensus—building with a commitment to shaping the future Coral Gables Chamber of of our communities through good urbanism. Commerce SEE Green Committee member RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Adjunct Professor,University • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract of Miami's Urban Design and Architecture Studios • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan • Creative Village Strategic Planning and Funding Feasibility, Downtown Orlando, FL* • Downtown Albany GA:The Oaks at North Intown Master Plan* • South Columbus GA:Arbor Point Neighborhood Revitalization Plan* • Central Columbus GA:Ashley Station Neighborhood Revitalization Plan* • Downtown Columbus, GA: Booker T.Washington/Historic District Revitalization Plan* • Downtown Phenix City AL: Riverfront Master Plan* ;:PA ,c i! ' tI . : i' ' It I ' ,, , , 1• t4 s ';� . n 11 ,i :i I1' U ii t 1 i ., iU ~ . f-, ± .F t I ~• -it - . 'v•ti L �} ji ` V z `43 A' f,ir 7 'Iv '`,.f 'independent Experience Washington Avenue City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 40 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S G'ouo A-Architectu-e:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications GRACE PERDOMO,ASSOC.AIA Senior Urban Designer LIST OF GRANT APPLICATIONS SUCCESSFULLY AWARDED Since 1999, Grace Perdomo has assisted PHAs and Cities across the country with preparation of Federal and State Grant Applications with a high success rate as reflected in the chart below. Over the past 15 years. these grant applications have been awarded over $415 million in federal grant funds and represent over $2.1 billion dollars of current and/or proposed investments in cities across the U.S. NOFA YEAR PHA-CITY COMMUNITY OR GRANT TYPE FUNDED 1998 Tampa,FL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Ponce de Leon Homes) YES* 1999 Birmingham,AL(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Metropolitan Gardens) YES* 2000 Chattanooga,TN(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(McCallie Homes) YES* 2001 Chicago,IL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Robert Taylor Homes) YES* 2002 Columbus,GA(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Peabody Apartments) YES* 2003 Birmingham,AL(1) HUD HOPE VI Grant(Tuxedo Court) YES 2007/2008 Chicago.IL HUD HOPE VI Grant(Stateway Gardens-Phase 2) YES 2009 Newark,NJ HUD 2009 NSP1(2) Five applications submitted, Baxter awarded first round NSP1 funding 2009 Chicago,IL HUD CFRC 2009 Submitted to HUD for approval Category 1,3 and 4(ARRA Funding) 2009 Chicago,IL CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 2:Public Housing Category 2(ARRA Funding) Transformation HUD Grant Award for$9.99 M 2009 Chicago.IL CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 4:Energy Efficiency/ Category 4(ARRA Funding) Moderate Rehab HUD Grant Award for$18.31 M 2009 Chicago,IL HUD CFRC 2009 YES-CFRC Category 4:Energy Efficiency/ Category 4(ARRA Funding)(2) Moderate Rehab HUD Grant Award for$7.34 M 2009 Chicago,IL HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2(ARRA YES-Awarded 01/14/2010:$98.1 M Funding)(2) 2009 Montgomery,AL HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Submitted to HUD for approval Program 2(ARRA Funding) 2009 Columbus,GA HUD CFRC 2009 Category 4(ARRA Funding) Submitted to HUD For approval 2009 Tampa,FL HUD NSP2-Neighborhood Stabilization YES-HUD Award January 2010:$38.0 M Program 2(ARRA Funding)(3) 2009 Charlotte,NC HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(2) YES-HUD Award March 2010:$20.9 M (Boulevard Homes) Highest Scoring 2010 HOPE VI Grant Application 2009 Montgomery,AL HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(Tulane Court) Submitted to HUD November 17,2009 2009 Houston,TX HUD 2009 HOPE VI Grant(Kelly Village) Submitted to HUD November 17,2009 2010 Orlando,FL USDOT FY2010 TIGER II Capital Grant(3) YES-USDOT Award October 2010:$10.0 M 2010 Birmingham,AL HUD 2010 HOPE VI Grant(Loveman Village) Submitted to HUD November 17,2010 2010 Albany,GA HUD FY2010 Choice Neighborhoods Initiative YES-HUD CNI Planning Grant Award March Planning Grant(2) 2011:$250K Planning Grant Highest Scoring Grant Application.Only 17 apps awarded out of 119 submittals to HUD 2012 Tampa,FL FY2012 Choice Neighborhoods Implementation YES-HUD Award December 2012:$30.0 M Grant(3) (*)While with Wallace Roberts& Todd(WRT);(1)W+P also serves the PHA as part of The Boulevard Group Program Management Team overseeing HOPE VI program implementation;(2)In collaboration with Boulevard Group,Inc.;(3)In collaboration with Lambert Advisory,LLC City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 41 P-ofessiona'Architectural and Engineering Se-vices i n Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications MANUEL DEL MONTE Senior Urban Designer Manuel del Monte has worked on a large number of urban design and planning projects EDUCATION throughout the southeastern United States,as well as internationally. In his role as Senior Master of Architecture,Florida International University 2006 Urban Designer, he brings his expertise in visioning, programming, conceptual design, design guideline development and zoning analysis to the firm's commissions. Manny Architectural Studies.Florida International University 2004 has advanced experience in various design software programs including: GIS Mapping Software,Arc Map,AutoDesk,AutoCAD,3D Studio VIZ 4,3D Studio Max, Rhinoceros HONORS& 3D,and Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign. PUBLICATIONS Architecture&Connectivity, RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Alfredo Andia,Ph.D.,editor • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract Editorial Universidad UNIACC • Downtown West Palm Beach Zoning and Master Plan Update SECCA HOME House • Midtown Miami Master Plan and Zoning Competition,Honorable Mention • Miami Beach Convention Center District Redevelopment Plan & Update • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Selected Work displayed at the 2005 Biennial in the Design • City of Miami Omni Area Community Redevelopment Plan& Update District • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Plan • Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cape Coral CRA Vision and Master Plan • City of Cocoa Beach Design Standards • City of Ocoee CRA Planning • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Downtown Hollywood CRA Master Plan • Downtown Hollywood(Young Circle)CRA Master Plan Update • Hollywood Beach CRA Vision and Zoning Master Plan • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan • Bayfront Park Capital Improvements Plan T !. - `S.-:- ` il, .....111004160. jf*,.. .4' , • '''''....: '"..' rr_-.� O - Ie-1111P • City of West Palm Beach Downtown Master Plan Update,Zoning&Architectural Standards City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 42 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications THORN GRAFTON,AIA, LEED AP Director of Sustainable Initiatives&Historic Preservation Architect Thorn Grafton directs all historic-related work at Zyscovich,using his personal knowledge EDUCATION and perspective on the unique resources of culture,history,and the environment.A third Bachelor of Architecture Tulane University 1976 generation architect,projects with a confluence of history,community,and sustainability have been at the core of his interests and his philosophy. Thorn's introduction to historic Master of Architecture Tulane University 2004 preservation came in 1969 when his forefather's architectural firm purchased their offices at the sprawling Douglas Entrance complex,a 1926 masterpiece of Coral Gables developer SELECT PROFESSIONAL George Merrick.There he learned preservation tricks such as spreading sheep manure on CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES: new clay tile roof tiles and mild acid etching of copper,to accelerate"patina"on building Engineering for Preservation, materials. Thorn's courses at the Tulane School of Architecture explored the variety of National Center for Louisiana's historic architecture.After graduation, he worked eight intense months as an Preservation Training and Technology.Natchitoches.LA apprentice to three restoration carpenters restoring two 1880's Victorian houses in New Orleans.He returned his Alma Mater in 2004 to deliver the annual Richard Koch Lecture Florida International University: South Florida Native to the Graduate Preservation Studies Program. Landscaping Thorn is a LEED Accredited Professional and founding member of the US Green Building Harvard Graduate School of esign:Sustainable Design Council South Florida Chapter.He has a wealth of experience as a design professional and with Randall Croxton,FAIA has in-depth,specialized training in sustainable and LEED design principles. His project Rock Mountain Institute: experience ranges from historic preservation,community redevelopment,environmental Biomimicry Conference education and neighborhood planning to sustainable design and construction. Southface Energy Institute: RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: Green Trends Solar PV training at Miami- • New Orleans(Post Katrina) Neighborhood Redevelopment Plans Dade College and the Florida • Miami DDA Downtown Master Plan Solar Energy Center • 21st Street Community Center Historic Adaptive Re-use, Miami Beach, FL • Lafayette Parish Downtown Plan Framework and Model Nodal Development Plan REGISTRATIONS • City of Coconut Creek Mainstreet Vision, Master Plan and Design Guidelines Florida Architect#8200 • Cape Coral CRA Visioning and Zoning Master Plan LEED Accredited Professional • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan PROFESSIONAL • Miami Senior High School Master Plan, Historic Restoration&Additions AFFILIATIONS • Coconut Grove Library Historic Building ADA Renovations&Addition Founding Member(and current • Board Member)of the US Stranahan House and Museum Coordination of City's Riverwalk Connection" Green Building Council South • Bethel House African American Bahamian Museum Relocation & Rehabilitation* Florida Chapter • Cauley Square Historic District Preservation & Development Master Plan* Member of the City of Miami • Hurt Building Rehabilitation &Opa Locka Boulevard Historic Master Plan* Historic and Environmental • Historic Preservation of the Royal Palm&Shorecrest Hotels, Miami Beach, FL* Preservation Board • Little Haiti Cultural Center&Caribbean Marketplace President of the Board of • Northwest Gardens Affordable Housing Community Phases I I & IV Trustees of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Biscayne • Seventh Avenue Transit Village Affordable Housing TOD Nature Center on Key Biscayne Member of Miami-Dade County Shoreline Development •r •_ ---- Review Committee ' ill .* 6,. --- '''''''.'-- 11 1111 -' -' -„...„ :7.,,, , .. oh 1 - : •4 ..... - _� ,',A:":'.4A-,,._' . 0 11_ i . ..,„-„,„:„: S . 1U■EU `i. III III■pp uui il11 fin, lit ia " ' I A 1000- as NIP OM . . II . . ''` i` *Independent Experience 21s`Community Center City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 43 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S I Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications DARYS AVILA Jr. Urban Designer&Graphics Specialist Darys Avila has worked on a number of architectural and urban design projects. With a EDUCATION dynamic and fresh approach to project development, Darys maximizes her involvement Master of Science in Architecture and Urban Design and works as an integral part of the team to achieve the best possible design outcomes Colombia University,2010 for the projects and plans in which she is involved.She provides support on urban design Graduate School of and architectural projects, to include conceptual design and massing, design guideline Architecture,Planning and development,zoning analysis and graphic design.Her passion for urban design,improving Preservation(GSAPP) the quality of life of neighborhoods,and respect for the identity of a place are evident in Bachelor of Architecture. her work. Darys is also highly proficient in the preparation of presentations. Summa Cum Laude, Universidad Iberoamericana Darys is highly proficient in graphic design and the preparation of presentations.She has (UNIBE).Santo Domingo,DR advanced experience in a number of design and graphic programs including:GIS Mapping Software,Arc Map,AutoDesk,AutoCAD, 3D Studio VIZ 4,3D Studio Max,Rhinoceros 3D,Adobe Photoshop,Adobe Illustrator and Adobe InDesign. RELEVANT PROJECTS INCLUDE: • City of Miami Beach/CM B CRA Continuing Service Contract • Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan • City of Jacksonville Vision Plan and Future Land Use Element • City of Jacksonville Southside Boulevard Corridor Visioning Study • Cocoa Beach CRA Downtown Vision and Zoning • Tampa Innovation Alliance Master Plan • RonJon Site&Surrounding Area Master Plan and Visioning • Airport City at Miami International Airport • PGA Waterfront MXD • Yacht Haven Master Plan • Peary Court, Key West Master Plan • Presidential Golf Course Master Plan • Gibson Park Planning Charettes 2.F ocus on the Core i rain f ata evewsbow tr+w a mw ootorer oft.*coo 7617 1 armnri*[/t VPs., as+awa�t r...i w�.�. 4.-- _+. 0l.A57Y17 tm..A sr..a r 11/W.M11 K+I...nM►:a swawn+wle ape u nu.9,197 w.•w.w Fso[ia.. 3.Increase the Variety of Open Spec. ; L } - 1 Lafayette Parish Comprehensive Plan Districts&Guiding Principles City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 44 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 2:Experience&Qualifications FINANCIAL CAPACITY DUN&BRADSTREET'S DUNS NUMBER Zyscovich, Inc.'s D&B DUNS number is 177052818. Zyscovich requested the SQR report from Dun & Bradstreet at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/ servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 and arranged for the Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)to be sent directly to the Procurement Contact at e-mail address:yusbelgonzalez®miamibeachfl.gov on Friday, October 3, 2014 and delivery was verified by receipt. s - . _--__ :9 , , ,f_. 4,4 . .„r",,,,,,,,„„„ ...•.-1 _ 7 "'riiinn ��,,_-_�r r+� orm„i++ ii$ -'4_ , I ,� 1 • 'r 7` Awnwr . -_,...„....., i.„ if ' ,arl .--- '1 1 g I estiezig,_ „dor- 1 0., _ _.:„.6• i ...= I ....4...__ -— N a ' 1 \ ' s t *01 . .1 ,,.. a i II ` T\, ter- •s---«. .�R J'--- `toe i - y, 4.-.g .. � lb*,,,r , ; ,_, ,. ,. - : ill :, ...y.,.: - , ,k, . . ■ I ► - _ r Ilir j rr BankUnited Miami Beach City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 45 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis” A R C H I T E C T S 1 M I AM I BEAC I RFQ 2014-346 YG GROUPA - TOWN PLANNING MP ‘.. U r 3 • _ . Approach & Methodology _i S 'Y " .... ., -i n i-R ~ Jam` •. + s, ..., .........,..._ 1.. „e,A..).-.. i.--.,-- ,-,:-. --_- I --,.. ...4 101141rti V. ,,k , J ;Ili-� �, ._ .. it "A., -1',” ...1.;;;::::- t..,,r. ✓ a,; 1, 4:.--.11- ----:-..- # li 1 .--r..iki - ii,„9,f # ......, i ;I ' i ZYSCOVICH ..`�"`" A R C H I T E C T S '!R . ~ "t WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES ;_ ,.r - r� Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Zyscovich Architects is a 90+-person integrated Urban Design,Architecture and Interior Design firm -- headquartered in Miami,Florida with additional offices in Orlando,West Palm Beach,New York + '- City,and Bogota.The firm has garnered a reputation for its significant architectural and -``` _'�� f ' /,.. q interior design work and for the creative solutions it brings to complex redevelopment ;,,i! _ • 'r'.% master plans and urban renewal projects for cities, towns,and municipalities. C 1' `� '`�' Over the past 37 years,the firm has completed numerous master plans, / i ii / and urban design projects that successfully integrate visioning,branding, •-�' ;` and concept development with the needs of the local economy and the __ ___1- ._s•} +''•a ,,,:_„r,. desires of the community.Our focus is in finding the right solution for , i'. 1.-- _ L ,i- : ... each project that is based on our client's functional needs, thorough ;e-i. L 0 f-viii_ y , _., ' � economic analysis, a deep understanding of sustainable design and _,'- 3 aesthetic value, and a sensibility to the cultural characteristics of the F`T ` ' �;� y �I 1 community. aster Plan for the Miami y. Beach Convention Center I t' We are proud to be a part of the South Florida community for over 37 District j years and take great pride in our work, striving to design projects that celebrate and enhance their surroundings.As a firm that has produced varied scales of urban designs,vision and master plans in diverse cities throughout the country,Zyscovich brings a wealth of knowledge in transportation and pedestrian circulation,economic analysis,zoning codes and public participation.We have also developed effective processes and creative tools that can shape the public realm through carefully crafted guidelines. Our team has a solid understanding of how to effectively collaborate with multiple districts,agencies,institutions,and neighborhood groups, while effectively maintaining a coherent vision from the planning and/ -- - .. or schematic design phases through construction administration.This •. •r ii . ,n,,,•- ".•lIi� experience, combined with our teams intimate knowledge of Miami ', . , !tmn•..i Beach gained through projects such as the Miami Beach Convention .4 `;� 4 '' .,,i �� °°•t+�• t . Center District Redevelopment Plan and Update,the Lincoln Cinema - . . and Retail Complex,the 500 Block of Collins,the Washington Avenue y- ' Studies,and many other projects,will allow us to expeditiously complete ' . - any and all proposed projects. Lincoln Cinema&Retail Complex 3 t _ r`=y, One of our primary services is zoning evaluation and code writing ' L and we are highly skilled at translating a client's vision into a 1 all. Ili I .`° _ regulatory framework.This often includes design standards which --- explore more specific language and form related to building fa °" ' -.E- t 77 _:N image, design and character. We have developed codes and•r `" zoning recommendations for more than 25 municipalities and id.- -•• fw " V � agencies.We recently completed a zoning overlay and design i standards for Downtown Cocoa Beach in coordination with their redevelopment plan.We provided similar services for the entire Downtown West Palm Beach,as well as for Cape Coral, Florida and Downtown Hollywood. All three were developed �' , _ : ....T.,— - :,, ;. , in coordination with a vision and master planning process which Convention Center District Master Plan Update preceded the zoning rewrite. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND WORKING WITH MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS The Zyscovich Team's approach is to facilitate the process from a project's conception through its successful completion. We begin our comprehensive approach to the scope of services by partnering with the client,consultants,and community City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 46 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T 5 Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology to develop solutions that will be thoroughly integrated with their ` vision. Our team is highly experienced in establishing productive and successful relationships with city staff,lay committees and other key stakeholders. This ability to cultivate effective partnerships has led to the successful completion and implementation of numerous high-quality vision and redevelopment plans.By collaborating with city wi` staff and working together,we are able to identify the most important . issues and develop realistic and feasible solutions.We have specific 't'-° " and extensive experience working with city officials and municipalities to follow through with entitlement procedures that enable our projects to proceed in a timely manner. The Zyscovich Team's proposed Project Manager and key personnel are all extremely proficient at making clear and effective public presentations and facilitating public meetings.We have successfully ' - t. . p•`_. implemented numerous public outreach and educational campaigns related to redevelopment efforts.As part of our master planning and visioning efforts we favor building consensus by presenting ideas which motivate the community to embrace a comprehensive vision.We have `" '�!' Y P successfully conducted thousands of stakeholder meetings,community °: '��. workshops, and presentations. While every project is different, we +A' ' t have a toolbox of proven techniques for engaging the community,its or leaders and key players who will champion the final vision,to include Stakeholder Meetings, Workshops and Charrettes, Neighborhood Surveys,Online Surveys and Forums,Panel Discussions and Advisory Boards. Zyscovich considers the process of community engagement, public outreach and stakeholder involvement important components in the development of a sustainable planning framework with special attention paid to the planning of a process that addresses the practical issues of time frames,resources and achievable outcomes.All must be implemented, evaluated,and most likely,modified as needed.One of the first decisions city officials will need to make is how to approach and how best to organize for community and stakeholder participation.Larger cities might establish a citizen committee to shape community involvement procedures across all sustainability program matters. In smaller cities, municipalities, or neighborhoods,a steering committee or task force specifically assigned to sustainability might be more effective.In either case,the committee should represent the demographics and geography of the entire community. Community workshops are an opportunity to listen to the community-at-large and gain further knowledge of their values and desires.They are also where our team will have the opportunity to share and test our observations of existing conditions and economic research,as well as the development of specific concepts and the overall direction of the vision. SUSTAINABLE PLANNING AND DESIGN Zyscovich Architects has a long tradition of expertise in sustainable design, with a commitment to projects that fit their locations, perform their functions well and are designed to last. Our sustainable project approach incorporates an analysis of three key project components: the project program, project budget, and sustainable objectives. Our sustainable design methodology involves a highly integrated design approach incorporating all key team members from A-Us the project's inception. 'gAaw Sustainable community frameworks attempt to give form and direction -11. --._ to the environmental,social,and economic activities of a locality.Across 40IW the nation and around the world,communities are taking on the task of both defining sustainability and identifying the requisite actions needed to get them there. A good Sustainability Plan is the first step towards creating a more sustainable city. By providing a framework that breaks City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C O V I C H 47 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology down what could otherwise be an overwhelming list of issues and linkages into manageable pieces, it conveys a vision for the future,sets realistic targets,and a plan for measuring progress and achieving community goals. We approach urban planning and design projects by identifying contextual opportunities to y, capitalize on past and present characteristics of a particular place and to help frame issues and evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches.Understanding a community's vision of where it wants to be is critical.We have termed this design philosophy Real Urbanism®.Real — ; Urbanism®is a concept that supports sustainable development by understanding how a city - came to be and considers past and present development patterns,local and environmental - needs for better communities,and socioeconomic obstacles and opportunities.Our focus ii --* is on merging the economic development opportunities,based on our economist's market assessment,with appropriate design solutions.Solutions reflect the community stakeholders' needs and desires and match the cultural aesthetic which is inherent in the community,with r_,•r special attention to scale,character,and preservation.This design philosophy is featured Iz ,' �► �'"1 in two books published by the firm's Managing Principal,Bernard Zyscovich:Getting Real About Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities and l'ARCAEDIZIONI's Monograph Getting Real About Urbanism: Zyscovich Architecture and Real Urbanism®,featuring Zyscovich projects with a preface Contextual Design for Cities by Frank O. Gehry. In all of our planning work, our focus is on developing guiding principles, goals and objectives collectively to define community scale sustainability, and present a vision of how communities can become more healthy, inclusive, and prosperous across specific categories.These guiding principles,goals and objectives provide a much needed vocabulary that local governments and their communities can use to more effectively strategize, to define their sustainability planning efforts and to identify responsible entities,benchmarks and output targets. Resulting solutions match the issue of sustainability within the larger quality-of-life framework of the community,with special attention to issues of scale, character,and preservation.Unlike prescriptive planning approaches,Real Urbanism®cultivates uniqueness,addressing the origins, history,climate,natural elements,specific needs and future evolution of a place. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Land Use is the most visible of the sustainability planning components.Cities with sustainable land use create an obvious balance of environmental preservation, commerce and livability as well as enhanced systems of connectivity between land use and transportation. We understand that improving the interaction between economic systems, ecological systems,and societal needs and taking a holistic view of all the systems necessary for a sustainable city often identifies opportunities to increase efficiencies, lessen impacts, and provide greater livability. The regulation of land use and development shape issues such as infill development, neighborhood master plans,transportation, housing, economic development,and zoning. Under Land Use and Development,our approach is focused on key planning and design components generally defined by the following focus areas: • Strong Sense of Place:Decisions about land use and development should reflect and celebrate what is unique about a community's people,culture,heritage,and natural history. • Integration of Sustainable Community and Building Features: Sustainability planning should integrate a variety of residential, commercial, recreational, and civic facilities essential to the daily life of residents of differing demographic profiles and at the same time,emphasize green building and low impact development. • Multimodal Connectivity:Communities should emphasize bicycle and pedestrian-oriented mobility,with daily needs situated within easy and enjoyable walking distance of each other. To promote this access, residential, commercial,recreational,and civic uses should be connected by both public and private transportation options. • Open Space:The City of Miami Beach has distinctive neighborhoods and a variety of parks and recreational components. A plan to contain, preserve and/or expand the green spaces that are designed to encourage consistent active and passive use can help further shape the direction of the city's environmentally sustainable City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 48 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology PROCESS While every project is different,we begin by evaluating each project based on four types of neighborhoods which,we believe,are representative of all neighborhoods: • Vital neighborhoods are destinations with cultural arts,beauty,and enhanced services.The greatest challenge in vital neighborhoods is in maintaining affordability for the working class.Vital neighborhoods need to continually self-evaluate for long-term improvement. • Stationary environments fulfill the basic needs of residents,but lack evidence of progress,identity,or a sense of place.They are disconnected from any urban nexus and show little promise for new development. • Disinvested neighborhoods lack the basic standard of living. Their population has significantly declined, property values have continuously depreciated, and the population has no advocacy. • Non-functioning urban neighborhoods have devolved as a result of their own undefined growth and become unlivable because of congestion,pollution,and crime. Diminishing services create zones of disinvestment,and only those residents in the highest economic stratum can safely or comfortably exist. This evaluation typically starts with: 1. A data collection, analysis, and assessment to provide an overview of historic development patterns, existing •0 demographics, existing and future land uses, zoning, :R*.•1111°P111111L infrastru cture,transit and transportation conditions,and the r, :vio economy summarized in a series of GIS generated maps and a technical report.This process includes an immersion into �' the project area for a period of two to five days.This is the best way way for our team to get a true sense of the area and builds a foundation of partnership with the client. Anchor Shops,Miami Beach 2. A public involvement strategy engages stakeholders by asking them to take ownership of their community and contribute to the solutions.The team works with the governing body,citizen groups,and staff to create a list of potential participants for the duration of the project.A series of six meetings evaluates the problems and solutions by shifting participants'role to take ownership of the project and contribute to its success. 3. A market trends analysis will identify economic advantages and potentials Master Plan within each neighborhood including a market analysis for major land use,a residential market and needs analysis,and redevelopment analysis. With the preliminary evaluation completed,we often follow a four step process which includes: 1. Developing a list of vision and goals:objectives and guiding principles based on the community's values,to establish the project goals and provide clarity for the design process. 2. An urban design analysis to explore how the existing issues related to building patterns and land use,identified in the existing conditions analysis, can be resolved by enhancing the public realm and the built environment. This includes testing potential uses and building design for compatibility with the vision and available land. 3. A list of policies and recommendations for growth and development to frame the findings from the urban design analysis and the fundamentals of the objectives and guiding principles.This may include writing regulations and code. 4. A list of catalyst projects and planning priorities,strategies,and program development to provide specific steps for implementing the vision plan goals. City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 49 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology ADDED VALUE Zyscovich is motivated to add value to our projects that goes beyond our commitment to quality planning,design and construction.This has included an awareness of multiple funding augmentation opportunities that may be available to projects that use integrated sustainable design in the enhancement of their critical mission. We have engaged in the following initiatives: • Pursue high level sustainable certifications and target awards programs that will bring greater awareness of the project; • Identified portions of projects that can be successfully targeted for community fund-raising after the project is complete; • Have retained funding consultants to create targeted funding campaigns for public projects through 501c 3 "Friends Of..."organizations; • Investigated opportunities to bundle performance contracting for several expensive building features into one managed energy and water saving program, allowing projects to move forward when capital budgets are insufficient; • We collaborate with a local economist who is aware of emerging opportunities in the field of municipal finance as well as local and national federal funding sources. NATIONAL EXPERTISE AND RECOGNITION BY OUR PEERS: Many of our projects have been published in national periodicals, including Urban Land Magazine. Mr. Zyscovich has served on the City of Miami Urban Development Review Board,the Miami Beach Design Review Board,and is a Past Chairman of the Miami Design Preservation League, the historic preservation group responsible for establishing the Art Deco District of Miami Beach. Our Director of Design,Suria Yaffar,Assoc.AIA, LEEDS'AP has been honored as the Urban Designer of the Year by AIA Miami.Zyscovich's staff includes more than 20 LEED Accredited Professionals who also bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in the realm of - •,i I lip. ;, ea Sustainable Design.Some of our relevant awards include:AIA Florida's Firm of the Year;the 11 ". ; APA Florida Award of Excellence for the City of West Palm Beach Planning and Zoning;the APA Florida Gold Coast Section Outstanding Master Planning Award of Excellence for the Park Square at Doral Master Plan;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for the Downtown Miami DDA Master Plan Study;the AIA Florida Unbuilt Honor Award for Midtown Miami; and the APA Outstanding Urban Design Project or Study for Midtown Miami. Zyscovich: Architecture and Real Urbanism MARKET AND FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS A rigorous, independent feasibility analysis—one which ensures that development projects are optimally positioned— substantially reduces the risk for owners and investors.This includes experience among a wide range of real estate uses including:retail/entertainment;office; housing;marina;hotel;industrial;and cultural/civic.They provide more than an indication of achievable rents and absorption. Each of their studies includes in-depth perspectives on the marketplace and detailed design guidelines for architects and planners. In cases where plans already have been drawn up or projects built but require repositioning,they offer a constructive critique about how to make the project more marketable and manageable.Successful projects,whether single use or major mixed use programs,are responsive to fluid market conditions and financial requirements.We strive to position our clients to realize the maximum economic potential of a project. Washington Avenue Study,Miami Beach,FL City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 50 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology WORKLOAD Zyscovich is one of the largest architectural firms in Florida with a staff of more than 90 professionals. We therefore have the resources and expertise to expeditiously complete the work proposed by the City of Miami Beach.Our current workload is minimal and when combined with our staff resources,allows us to handle multiple projects concurrently.Our ability to deliver as promised has established our firm as a leader.We are committed to definitive scheduling and timely performance of our services. Our previous successes in the governmental sector are based upon a solid foundation of executing award-winning, innovative concepts that enhance the character of a place and a history of exceeding our clients' expectations. The staff assigned in this proposal will be with the projects from their inception through their successful completion.Additional staff will be assigned as necessary to meet the budget, schedule and programmatic objectives of each project. WORK IN PROGRESS PROJECTS FEE REMAINING MDC Hialeah Campus Remodel&Renovation $56,238.59 Palm Beach State College Building 1 $449,608.25 Hillel Hebrew Day School Multiple Projects $35,000.00 FLL T4 Gate Replacement/Expansion $501,343.02 Michael-Ann Russell JCC $29,899.14 Fort Lauderdale Aquatic Center $609,827.60 All Aboard Florida Station Design N/A per Client Seventh Avenue Transit Village $87,700.58 Panorama 1101 Brickell E Tower $23,358.39 Fl Continuing Service Contract Projects $163,454.00 Brighton Public Safety Building $26,809.07 FAU College of Medicine Office Building $84,209.05 Wedgefield K-8 School $868,150.00 Immokalee Middle School Addition $81,799.50 Aloft at Park Square Aventura $900,000.00 Miami Country Day School Multiple Projects $634,672.25 Brighton Charter School $33,750.00 Downtown Doral New Charter Elementary $142,090.00 Library Renovation,North Miami $7,500.00 PGA Waterfront MXD N/A per Client Bayside Marketplace Renovation N/A per Client Our Lady of Guadalupe $103,600.00 2600 Douglas Rd Office Tower $41,000.00 AC Hotel Aventura $902,070.00 Big Cypress Ahfachkee School $826,700.00 ME by Melia Renovation N/A per Client Bal Harbour Shops Renovation N/A per Client COMB Washington Ave.Studies $108,000.00 Maxwell AFB Elementary-Middle School $1,218,779.15 Coral Gables Sustainability Master Plan N/A City Village,GA Master Plan $224,900 Total $8,160,458.59 City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z Y S C O V I C H 51 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services i n Specialized Categories on an As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S r I Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PARTICIPATION Although Zyscovich is not an DBE firm, we recognize the importance of nurturing relationships with DBE firms and, as such, have been working with several firms on a regular basis, not just to fulfill a required percentage. Zyscovich is committed to meeting the City's goals for subcontracting with disadvantaged business enterprises as evidenced with our DBE Participation Plan. Depending on the scope of a specific project awarded,we will utilize local DBE subconsultants to the extent possible,to potentially include landscape architects,civil engineers,economists,geotechnical engineers, survey crews, traffic engineers, and environmental engineers to supplement our team, not only to increase our total DBE participation,but to capitalize on these firms'specific knowledge.We have successfully implemented this teaming methodology on countless projects and have found these firms'specific expertise to be invaluable, especially during permitting.We will oversee the work of the disadvantaged businesses to providing mentoring opportunities for these small businesses,ensuring opportunities and experience for these firms while maintaining QA/QC oversight and design compliance for the City. Zyscovich also has a Local Vendor Outreach program in - \ place, in which we identify non-traditional disadvantaged \ business enterprises in a project's community for procurement \ opportunities,such as couriers,print houses,photographers, caterers, etc., ensuring that each community we work in receives an economic benefit from the projects we design i t-� I. beyond temporary design and construction jobs. s ^ ' ` Zyscovich has an excellent history of meeting or exceeding DBE participation goals. For example, our Miami Dade College Hialeah Campus project had a College-standard maximum participation goal of 25%. We exceeded this amount by utilizing 45%DBE firms.At Miami-Dade County '',--,t. Public Schools,where the typical participation goal is 15-20%, � we regularly exceed this with 38-46%participation.We have { also exceeded all DBE participation goals on our federal ' projects for the Department of Defense Eduction Activities , .,., li (DoDEA). In 2012 alone, Zyscovich Architects paid out 40%of all subconsultant fees to DBE firms,representing ,-, 4 �' nearly$1.5 million in fees. �� As part of our outreach and internship program,Zyscovich has developed an initiative plan to expand opportunities . to subconsultant engineering firms.The program consists of mentoring new DBE subconsultant engineers with experienced engineering firms in order to gain expertise, - knowledge and familiarity with client-specific requirements. - After undergoing several successful projects with the ---- mentoring firms, they will become one of our prime ,- consultants and a partner of Zyscovich. This program has ' been so successful that several of our DBE engineering their respective DBE programs. " " n partners have outgrown thei P 9 Our DBE outreach also extends into the federal marketplace and includes national and local post SAME Small Business Conference and meeting participation whereby we actively seek qualified professional partners for current and future federal and local contract task orders. Lincoln Road Offices,Miami Beach City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG Z YS C OV I C H 52 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S 1 Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 3:Approach&Methodology ZYSCOVICH DIVERSITY Zyscovich supports diversity in our office and similarly supports diversity in our subconsultant teams.We have 90+ architects and other professionals,of which 69%are minorities and 43% are women. We have two women executive board members and four minority executive board members.Our staff represent 26 different countries. It has always been the policy of Zyscovich to be an "Equal Opportunity Employer" and to assure equal employment opportunities in all its practices without regard to race,color, religion, national origin/ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, disability(including anyone having a positive HIV/AIDS status or perceived as having such),age,pregnancy(including pregnancy related medical conditions) or marital status. Zyscovich gives equal consideration to the employment of disabled or handicapped persons for work with the firm that they are qualified to do.To carry out these responsibilities, Zyscovich insures that advertising, recruiting, hiring, promotion, training, transfer, and termination decisions are in accordance with the principles of this Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement. As part of Zyscovich's overall goals,Zyscovich management 1• 1% ■Caucasian Male recognizes that a commitment to fostering workplace diversity 1• 1% •Caucasian Female is fundamentally a moral and ethical imperative. Zyscovich is African American Male firmly believes that in an increasingly diverse national and global marketplace for architectural services,it is essential to a African American Female be positively attuned to the diversity of the marketplace and ■Hispanic Male our clients. Zyscovich firm members and employees must, •Hispanic Female therefore, be committed to fostering an atmosphere within 2% ■Pac#icFemale which diversity is viewed positively in order for us all to achieve s% •Pacific Male success. a Many/Other Male •Many/Other Female 4, - --- --qtr - r#1010701 ■ It I -,,,,,, -i ici ' - &loll illosnlitoil � ,,,... . 14. ner,, 1 , I J . .�i `■ Miami Beach Senior High School City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346-YG ZYSCOVICH 53 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services i n Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S 1 1 MIAMI BEAC I RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUPA - TOWN PLANNING 111 1 IL S _______ G Additional Information t, � ,',,:" . • r l �` it ,--, ...- ,,a- ... . . ,_ , . - ,.... ...4 • )qi•-:- 1: ' *66 *-,•,1 „......-- ,,,, r ZYSCOVICH A R C H I T E C T S � WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES r— Group A-Architecture:Town Planning WE MAKE PEOPLE PLACES. 4:Additional Information ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS The volume of work previously awarded to Zyscovich Architects in the last three(3)years,in accordance with Volume of Work Points,totals$132,000 and therefore should receive the full amount of points for this Evaluation Criteria Category. VOLUME OF WORK AWARDED Washington Avenue Study-Evaluation of Code and Massing $25,000 Washington Avenue Study-Vision and Master Plan $107,000 Total $132,000 VOLUME OF WORK POINTS Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01-$2,000,000 3 I Greater than$2,000,000 0 Itilla t • MF�i,IdY�YERUE ` 'i -4n i, , _Amor " •' ,, , x�4. 'rl t ',I' ii y, ating,:t;1x 41c N PRI _• !! JJ.: ,r1-I- - i�P T 94"11 iii O.:1i� � a��. 1 -*i..1 Iii " :- - 1r44 y i.r !Y• .EU000 AVENUE ..{` ... w ' �- -4. ! _ J i ' ; : 1 jj,..,,-,,,:" t;t1111 I- flii- !Ai I 1 nal iiIi& .- iniii,2.3,, z r M r K ^# - 1111%! u I., `�L - 11111 911 iP _ .1 ..'41 _i!. VR 'ilk—' i I lio• .14 iliac_ , • !: if ii({ , is,.%. n !--E ` �,s,,.,, •? - 'OREXEL'WEYUE ,� DRE IR/NEM•• ; ': • . teltialliter - -''' Lii A. -4 i 1. . . . _. ,- AIP - ) si..r, - *Ali 4 '•1 I I I Iii P a ti`s .. Washington Avenue Study-Vision and Master Plan City of Miami Beach RFQ/No.2014-346 YG y � Z YS C OV I C H 54 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As Needed-Basis" A R C H I T E C T S