Loading...
Agreement with Wade Trim, Inc. 0I'02 go (-0 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE: CIVL ENGINEERING RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 29 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 34 ATTACHMENT C 35 3 • O AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 24 day of December, 2015, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and WADE TRIM, INC. a FLORIDA corporation having its principal office at 815 NW 57 Avenue, Suite 06, Miami, FL 33126 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10th, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015- 29041, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with WADE TRIM, INC. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in 4 writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in 5 compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 6 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual 7 agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B— Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C,—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable 8 Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. 10 Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and 11 consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under 12 this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. 13 The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to 14 verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by 15 the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final 17 updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written 18 approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: WADE TRIM, INC. 815 NW 57 Avenue, Suite 06 Miami, FL. 33126 Attn: Tom Brzezinski— P.E. Tel: (813) 480-9000 Fax: (888)499-9624 Email: tbrzezinski @wadetrim.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of I court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY Florida, in federa c u , EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of 26 Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 27 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and C.: Clerk o ,q(:-*TIII r∎1,,`t-r first hereinabove written. At :st P 9 �� CITY OF MIAMI BEAC \ /or Y CLERK I▪N� MAYOR j CORP ORATED: •Attest i V▪**• - W4/ TR I U , /� k 4"1fr'4 ."... • /71i. :A/AAAti Sin.'ure/Secrets 94� �.•�`4 ignat `-/Presi'/nt , l' nA-h,v`G C-a(12.al ∎4 S S . &ger- 'MIS/C Prirame APPROVED AS TO Print Name FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION 28 11_10 (l, City Attorney Date :/ SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: WADE TRIM, INC. 815 NW 57 Avenue, Suite 06 Miami, FL 33126 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: p $ Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date • Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XX)UUUUU( Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XX)UU(XXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXX)UCX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXX )( Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design _ $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector(CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or $ 94.88 Construction) 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT: • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. 32 ACG® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 12/1/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Ames&Gough PHONE 703-827-2277 FAX 703-827-2279 8300 Greenboro Dr. (A/C,No,Ext): (A/c,No): E-MAIL admin ames ou h.com Suite 980 ADDRESS: g g McLean VA 22102 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Hartford Underwriters Insurance Corn 30104 INSURED WADETRI-01 INSURER a:Hartford Accident and Indemnity Corn 22357 Wade Trim, Inc(Miami) INSURER c:Hartford Casualty Insurance Company 29424 815 NW 57th Ave INSURER D:Beazley Insurance Company, Inc.A( 37540 Suite 120 Miami FL 33126 INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:962880000 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER IMM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) A x COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 08UUGAX2673 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE _$1,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $1,000,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $5,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 POLICY X Fi X LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 OTHER: $ B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 08UEGAX3182 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALLOS�ED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $1,000,000 AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTOS (Per accident) $ C UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR 06XHUXL1209 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $20,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED I X RETENTION$10,000 $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION O8WBGCR4914 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 X STATUTE OTH- ER AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE N/A E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 D Professional Liability V15W85140701 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 Per Claim $5,000,000 Aggregate $10,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space is required) AS NEEDED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT-RFQ NO.2014-346-YG-RESOLUTION NO 2015-29041 Certificate holder is included as Additional Insured with respect to General Liability when required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. PO BOX 20270 C/O INSURANCE TRACKING SERVICES, INC(ITS) AUTH RIZED EPR ENTATIVE LONG BEACH CA 90801 � t ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Policy Number: 08UUGAX2673 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER(S) This policy is subject to the following additional If notice is mailed, proof of mailing to the last known Conditions: mailing address of the certificate holder(s) on file with A. If this policy is cancelled by the Company, other the agent of record or the Company will be sufficient than for nonpayment of premium, notice of such proof of notice. cancellation will be provided at least thirty (30) Any notification rights provided by this endorsement days in advance of the cancellation effective date apply only to active certificate holder(s) who were to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses issued a certificate of insurance applicable to this on file with the agent of record or the Company. policy's term. B. If this policy is cancelled by the Company for Failure to provide such notice to the certificate nonpayment of premium, or by the insured, notice holder(s) will not amend or extend the date the of such cancellation will be provided within (10) cancellation becomes effective, nor will it negate days of the cancellation effective date to the cancellation of the policy. Failure to send notice shall certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file impose no liability of any kind upon the Company or its with the agent of record or the Company. agents or representatives. Form IH 03 13 06 11 Page 1 of 1 2011, The Hartford ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING. FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service WHEREAS, because of the magnitude o t g 9 p cate categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award b 9 q by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest t fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, s ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty g g, Inc.,, the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this • day of 71fl2Oi5. ATTEST: Rafael E. ranado, City I .:``` `''%�Philip Le V- Tel 0 r / AGENDA120151June1PR000R. ENT12014 ��—'% �°' T:I a!� ofessiona hite�.{,`I.and Engineering Services-Reso.docx :INCORP ORATED: , $ •♦ •mss f 7 26 APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: epartment Director Assi Manager City M ager AO,�/ ECX DM MT w_I JLM T:WGEND •015\June\PROCUREMENT\2014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa • x 143 M MIAIv\I B 1f3 AGAGENDA DA i DATE 6-10- S' I BE H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members he City Co / ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Barmello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA (Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the "Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer Ill, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also grovided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each P instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the proposal. The Committee was P P P evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Arclhfurai arnI EngrnecteerbigiServices Low SAE Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE• • :ARO ECTURE},.._ • Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 `> 4 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 =' 7 3 CRAVEN,THOMPSON& ASSOCIATES.INC. 1 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 4 MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. : 70 6 69 _ 4 _ 70 6 16 6 q 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE .REQ#xO1444& rProteasfosiiEArt I ectu Land:. /►�/ 4f J r N' f `" LOW Deborah Rogelio Valeria :; AGGREGATE_ EGEfVERAL>AR x', Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE i3 INTERIOR DESIGN,INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 8 1 GLAVOVIC STUDIO.INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES, INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS,INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS.INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 17 7 • WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE %.' ARCHITECTS,P.A. 87 4 78 9 75 10 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS,INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 •. 34 _ 11 CPI•I.INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 35 12 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 57 12 70 _ 12 55 14 38 13 CIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 70 12 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE I,:,109 0:2,Q14- yG � ;�>Ac+cihttiacturef:iind is LOW ingfneering Services Deborah Rogelio Valeria `_ AGGREGATE ``::' (TOWN PLANNING):: ::' Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking - TOTALS Rank ZYSCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 3 1 THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 2 76 2 83 2 6 2 i HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE s A4str j UStC a'ol€Vn Endo 1ad p a LOW e r -41STO t r , Deborah ry AGGREGATE ATE ± <bldg A loba ,- Tackett Ranking Madaln Ranking Mejia Ranking •t;',,a TOTALS Rank R.J.HEISENBOTTLE I '.; ARCHITECTS.P.A. 100 1 99 1 90 1 4" I 3 1 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ? ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 i 90 1 ., 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 98 2 91 3 75 4 9 3 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS • ARCHITECTS.P.A. 83 4 84 4 80 _ 3 ., 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING RFQ#2014446-Y0,Prc s iaE .s: rArr:hltectural anO EinAeetlingr : >: I.Ow e` Servic Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE CIVIL ENGINEERING ;z, .� � ;�, Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking TOTALS Rank WADE TRIM,INC. 95 2 97 1 81 8 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, , INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 : 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 10 90 6 96 1 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 • ; i 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, } INC. 96 1 95 3 62 24 ; 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY.INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 E 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES.INC. 94 3 87 11 70 18 32 9 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, F•' INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 '`- 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 ^'' 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 13 86 12 74 11 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 tit, I 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 39 15 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 1,, 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND t'': LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES.INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 f.': 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, , INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 66 21 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING,INC. 68 25 77 19 60 26 - 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 - 26 73 23 61 25 _ 74 26 LAND SURVEYING 'RF i 126 444Y6 ProfeestOnat Archft9CtutaI;and-, •EngIned Sar1Fk88.<' LOW Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE .. ,77" Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking ' OTALS Rank .SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 96 1 80 2 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 - 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 4 84 6 69 5 , _ 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING,INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& } INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES, INC. 77 8 75 9 60 9 26 9 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for For Group 4, the Committee con p p p Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING RED#20`14446-YG " -`Profes411anal Arc itecttrrat ana :.: Enghteering Service a ° ; LOW M CHAN AL,ELECTRtCA: Oniel Jose A Sabrina AGGREGATE ; D PLUMBING,,;_ Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 I 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 7 ! 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD Consulting Engineers _ 73 3 87 _ 2 85 3 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:AGENDA 12015\June\PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach 9 9 P Y • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:I AGENDA\20151June1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION (o.3 -%5 City Attorney Date 155 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 156 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 MIAMI B EAC City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,ww.v.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 . REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office `til then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 & 6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question #71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 / 2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications". In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 I Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 1 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 I ov YusbelGonzalez miamibeachfl. @ g Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro••_ .._ i ,. I ' Denis Procurement Director • MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B — Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement" from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION. The following clause has been added to Appendix D —Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. 1 Q2: Section Cl. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete A/E teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term, we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. • Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together(one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting, we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. Al 1: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section Cl. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, `It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how'they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 — Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A & B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City p g Y consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as "verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 — Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2'd underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1st underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 12 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects. performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm". The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer"in each firm /team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select A/E Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full NE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. • 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or "Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400—Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing - You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300- Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back - can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a - it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staff's diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question #24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 - For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to "term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The "user name" is the same as the"email address": vusbelgonzalez(a�miamibeachfl.gov Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required - In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B - Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS & ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO &ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN &ASSOCIATES BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI &PARTNERS, INC. RED DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD&ASSOCIATES ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP, INC. CALVIN, GIORDANO &ASSOCIATES SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOC INC I. CES CONSULTANTS, INC. SHULMAN &ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA, INC. WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason, we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q 64: In regard to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural E Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 12 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 12 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300 —Submittal Instructions and Format- TAB 2 - Experience & Qualifications, we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I - Sections, A-C; and sections F- Example Projects; G - Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II —General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections D-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under "specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design / Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A — Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled "Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A & B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category (minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix `C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a opropos.160„ L x� Denis Procurement Director 14 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 1 , 2014 15 MAMJBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME - COMPANY NAME. PHONE# F&Y# (PLEASE PRINT). E-MAIL.ADDRESS: Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vlisbelgzonzalez ceniamibeachtl.aov ext. 6230 `?AUL S. MASTRA?A °?.-o$5 t 11.Ago 5to-0130 v-mgsi:rapa@ v-056 bar. cow) fe APDO /-Areto' frIf-'l i . 1I 6 e..I ' i,, ,NC- -2 36-rig *D4 e m¢tr n .corn . i-rs'vet..) J. P .S 3P5e6o3702. 705-96o 3745 P et beviteltotafedikt. t -- fv1 Col C�,'v'l k 1�'���115 =c t�j �f it i C ti \ tj eaaVN c:S to, ®V C A t,U eC CIA l. C1 O\! '7'4 e2 iS C -. c-z\r C--' rvt r,". - P 3mss. G 305. G-73 . f3 Mpom, -, a -7 t 7 -7 3 MiNekr bbACAS fet e IAA tww•-:%1364Cu rr t..4.v Ti�� "t 3 - G /P DAYi D114#12-77 wg-Z i itym r►cp-prt Gvi ,q,3-fie Adr any),A 7s9 yl C• 6•P7-77 7( be -- 77P AfF-da , ,e4 to?.J rdearci zoZrr� beh¢r. con'i 1)14 matmiricNip.E. 30r 6c-ocird -t-n-a7cc ffoc, CfLp 2{S-hal ploage • Crr)_ AidAMIBEACH CI OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME . .COMPANY NAME • , (PLEASE P1RLNT) • • •PHONE# FAX# E-NAIL ADDRESS /Z7 rj:;rc./15 305--.5?6 t5,2'' c pthcAV c -7, CL su -t k.(.4 K . (erb AAEL)s; A, AA er mpAtE-Lr,E-n._g -fs, ";ocS- 0 "---3S00 -"Y7 -SZ 2-1 do\A.Y\ td.4 If) Q S tit 1.,4, er-rx-4 rc7714 C! A it/<)14- r5 f 7-417-11 C.r 5 /5/ (", c, jTI 4-6I -36/ 51'.C7 56) ST &bre 111101 5011 '14* MIAMI BEACH CITY OF vI IAM I BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1. 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECI=ALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAY# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CNIB 305-673-7000 736-394-4073 vusbeI onzalez'.miamibeachtl.u-ov ext. 6230 J '- z - Cs-4 CE N f2I- L /,i/G po5)44/-s429.1 630s344/.4-494 J yr l/a r€ csayroa f 736 8 P ez� fi�iCXs% ��5 jaSpri..j et-At re_kc.A (0,v1 Y ,E) 0 4-4 .,krifv,:ii.24(4-L, 3olc -2 " 3 (,1 Al . S . 11 ( OnSo - l o,/U0 //' �, s CA N(AC,14 i/(ZJA 65- o 1 1-fERNAN b e,k rlr,,Acje7..e) -li/'e •ern 32-Col ( h.tflr� t'A l r\-1-et(CSC 4-F CC-e LL-0-1 licaaN)) td% P Lk) ic;\ rv5 ? - 70 co Cu /N■r∎ I 4;0 � u rn` CAN 0 CQc c\tc. v I\.\ce(4- '1 CL‘ISe,a5 (ivlck.- 'Lk+CC -5i y VA\ .tCLcC_01LSc,-c 6Yfl T f 7 X171�'(6lCY L� (J'° iCeria "C 33C" YY-61.(9( .xvg .< 4,,:,;,\.4 v • , D t MIAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY Y� ME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbeluonzalez(miamibeachtl._ov ext. 6230 �i1ri5 r a &L �n iater111 acs-��C - s n- 6,0-a3V C0.ac(14V L�._bez-eAQ,Gorr, 0 P v< W!1iIef- � ��G e����� �l��il 1 36j -)7 /2 iivy;;•6)kii, c-ilette 7,1(A oc4117, 44-, !And lIio 0 ['1t1D ( .39 SC1_111 -0.1011 0 1;n. (4.14„, ci cam 26(11- 3 cfro .Thief,(1Q- Dfc1\ `;bps 3c ,LL. icA1Lk -\(Dan BacAA h cu '1/)4-.c tc t t �r� r:cof 30C-692-6NA CCas, (3c ".(74P9-.-‘2-33 t---YAc1-1>v % v �..s,, ,s G �_c-r✓e, 30s•vile i5,431 a 24 I. pit Eel.,rr■1 C:ea24N • -�y 1 /e,20 rCtA-rt 1.4E:1ck4 FL oScD_ 110 M CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME '{NAME; • (PLEASE"PR NT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS -WO l S A5 per (,S I o rS 60s- t Sher \s'/ Js. (Jyy . � �� _., �=--�- ';�,� � ,��J:� , roc,;- ��.�c;;s )I-1c. � --;-:�Y �� i ✓lJ ,L+ I 1 L fQ rerjr:011,0 V h 1-t)O L '. MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MI iMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 v-usbe ltIonzalezamiamibeachfl.Uov ext. 6230 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305) 441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305) 670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305) 446-7799 Ileana Gonzalez Robayna& Associates (305) 823-9316 Natalie Lockwood, Andrews & Newman (305) 444-6454 • Tom Decker Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners 305) 666-5474 Victor Herrera NV5 (954) 495-2112 Douglass Man CB&[ 561.361.3148 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY N ANIE (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Marcie Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Legg (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305)477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-D1AZ & VILLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozyman Haks Engineers, Architects and Land • (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting, (305) 265-5400 Shawn Stanley Consultants 786.762.4115 Mark URS Corporation 1 (305) 262-7466 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 13, 2014 16 a/it. MIAMIBEACH CITY OF NILa11/II BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" - NAME ,COMPANY NAM _ _ ' PHONE# •FA..X# • (PLEASE PRINT) :. . . . E-MAIL aDDitiSS . . .. . - Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalez'cvmiamibeachfl.uov ext. 6230 rT l�1'r (--Ez N 4(.) t�Ef► i f.Q.)/V1 3 C^< -,3 1- /t LC) � r xT i24- CS�j�j (305 ) 4-9 'EA Z-2 r: Ur; t-7-41 5:!? Er.:z.r;\i ct Z I Ai c:v.1 t" rz,57.11, j 6' v,�r ru,;,���c ;Ai C, -o . 76 7( ;zt; Ee cei-4-b4rc■ z315Gc,2j, e., c ,-ic ecj.l�: I1. r L0- A f 4 411 k_( ( s) tm�S e 4pk . 673- 9f J��c��c • Sc�����v `� c,:_eL oA--cc),`, 4'44- -7)5 4S Co p(0 I�I � Se.,ALt— , )SF1J�F�G c�R.Osie . Dr(1(.4.l �5��1t�I��� v-30\7,-01'\ L @ R ISEAI g CLCG ,GO rn S4okrvke-� 305 L(5-2q(-40 �jcoo�• t �-�tlo,Nk c-•cowl sty-- 6-i�-t j e v 114- �' �4 a((—A C.,n, 2�6� MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13. 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CNIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vlisbel17onzalez(miamibeachtL,zov ext. 6230 /3AA 4/449 P nio l4,411 ►ti• G ) !56.E hA� arA C r v� 3o S- 473 - rlG(.�rv�1 Qh.�r b��� • �' Varv-554-- tub e;t91 i7P'rt.kti 305 73éinvdeZ � v�ssG. k7i• v d vote? �v�.cow _iNkAecin (C) Koloill‘ar p I I Can a C V'cG g-etyfovIw 3aS G?S Ali 7A1,e'ReN \Mkt COD 14 el4Vea1-0t wti ci beat -7 ° MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL.AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalezOmiamibeachfl.Qov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovtec 352-459-1974 lance @innovtec.com James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn aksfla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting, 305-264-2557 Tom Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkski @wadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 305-567-1888 Ext. 4034 Jennv.alonso ccolin.com Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing. 561-494-7006 slbol inverts terracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 William.craven a,puretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 jpriemrv.g,leassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters & Associates 407-830-8700 jkemp c.bpa-engineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates6 zmail.com I 3 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRIrT) PHONE# FAX# E-iLAIL ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzun ';cphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin LIVS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin@livs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCI Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305) 461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 �I � MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 12, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UN TIL3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions.. regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Micmi Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fox: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.. ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. - Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. cerel , , I �>•� ru� n - n is °rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH • City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH • City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 7, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicpurchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall - 4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 I City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION # 1: The RFQ solicitation file published. on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. • CLARIFICATION # 2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps:. (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 1 S 1 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal_._ Sceire ,1 aenis Procurement Director I _ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMI BI BEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov MIAMI_/\I',I E . H TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG 2 `i I Af'V U BFACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term, with two (2)one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design/Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 MIAMI . The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19, 2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado @,,miamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 2014-346-SR 4 MIAMI;IAJ y , BF FA C H 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence." The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&stateID=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 MIAMI M I H • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT... CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011-3747, a five (5) point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFQ 2014-346-SR 6 AA INA I BEACH twenty(120)calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18. TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility; Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or . W.�.<.�HA.af.r-Ls RSS:'5:�.H+f.:�-'.,'•-' x+s-ig.:n-+zw.sa9?+S'la.Aa. -.zfuK� '.'6ytS)rcSSYw+X.2 @-�.it>. :.. •_•. +YC,.x-xw,M.A�ec-_xss..veari[xs Ftca'..:r.'1?atai_.nra '+as_:?.n_+¢a.�.en.+t�s: RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 /'\/\IAJV'\ BEACH services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then �.r.i31'i .-a.-. � !-.e-�:. r.'3='sG F.•�'T ,.ems:>;::t,`FW,v.3S-'-ems. Y.....rf x� :.._ .x__...n 3 .._a �_.s z...4s..}P-'Ta:aqs.-r Ka.ii-'3Y-s.aerbs.tX»'h ��-.in . i ro -.- mot. -.-.e ,. a .. . Ns. .. -....,• ..... - RFQ 2014-346-SR 8 t`\/j\I ANA 1 BEACH B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2014-346-SR 9 MIAMI BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2014-346-SR 10 l\' I A S BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a. proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. `:TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects, provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED, ULI, AICP,APA. RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 1,'I\A BEACH d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. TAB-2 • Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeId=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2014-346-SR 12 4� A J'.IA;°\ I BEACH TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2014-346-SR 13 AA1A \,I BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2 (Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions; or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s) (using the same criteria). Step 1 Qualitative Criteria ,M r J . i Maximum Points Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise DBE firms. 'i `� r '��,' TOTAL-AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS i�k 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. . :.� .S _ a i F Joe W.1 � ,J k-? Step 2 ;Quantitative Criteria• 4 }a�. �5 `� '` n Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three(3)years. See Section 4 below. TOTAL'AVAILABLE:ST EP.2S POINTS ..: 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 201 4-346-YG 14 :` A AN\I BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A g C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 .. . 3 Low Aggregate Score 3. 7 8 • Final Ranking* 1 2 3 *Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A AA AM I EA _ Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez(a miamibeachfl.gov, STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A -Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. - - . .-• - - - - ''= - • '--- --- _ .. . - - -• - - :•• - •• ' --- -• • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012 13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation same(in a particular year) fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 2 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasorable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 {,-: DISCLOSURE AND.DISCLAIMER•SECTION. '= _ ° r = •.• The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. NOMMEDIMICIIIIMMINSIDMINION, Mtn RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION = g' I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges . that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Res uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B AMAI\ AIMPArL.- Iry n I " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note.It is -important far those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the cached "Statement of No 'Bid." The ''Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process, Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified .cst.future soticitct ns by the City. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) '....4i•:C:.' -.... ;,-r ....:r..r Y•:-•.-. -..},r•.r_-.. ,7.:i t' .:s,.r_.- ..... .,J.-.,..i•T _ _ .. We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B — Page 1 APPENDIX C AA A M BEAC Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five(5) projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes; Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering (Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems;TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance • o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages; Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks • Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets; Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display, Theater, etc.) • Lighting (Exterior, Streets, Memorials, Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional,Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities(Parks, Marinas, etc.) • Rehabilitation(Buildings, Structures, Facilities, etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures s�:x^h."!.'.`9 -'v ar,A£rft4",.,�,t+:Y.: .a?n3f '•k"ra". 7`=' 'Xf 4;w:`t�drq°:3._ar ,c.r' s RFQ 20 4-34.6-Y6 Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping, GIS, and other services: O High Definition Services (HDS) o Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) O Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) O Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) O Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) and Underground Utility_Services O These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling & Facilities • Testing & Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply, Treatment and Distribution • Zoning; Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status (particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C APPENDIX D NA I AAA -, rH Special Conditions RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201 4 34GVG Appendix C 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. Q 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D — Page 1 I APPENDIX E tVA\ I A/kV\ I BFAC Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AmA AtiQpA v v INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 —Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V" as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E – Page 1 APPENDIX F /WAN\ I E I-1 Sample Contract RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND X)O(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX O X FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE I XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX)OOOOOOOCXXXXXXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)=XXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to . as City), and XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, a Florida XXXXXXXXXXX having its principal office at XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: X)00000000000000000000(; XXXXXXXXXXX)UUUCXXXXXJCX. 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation to ether with all exhibits, addenda, ( 9 and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G — Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any 9 Y P Y( ), Y non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the -exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule "D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XX)(XXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XXXXXX)(X. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never 1 exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and P PP 9 P commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to-a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMS\A&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name • I SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XX)O(XXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXX)O(X Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXX)UCXXX Historic Preservation Board / Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 City of Miami Beach I RFQ 2014-346-YG Request for Qualifications for I'- e, k 4 frt ''- I:I ' l'I [. ft . , , ..fl, 1 . .,,' -:,ii-_;,,,:.,,,,: - ' ' - d I 'r I , I ,..ove). Y• PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN 1 "AS-NEEDED BASIS" GROUP B - ENGINEERING: CIVIL December 2,2014 WADETRIM Tab • • Cover Letter •Minimum Qualifications Requirements T TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil A 1 . 1 Cover Letter December 2,2014 City of Miami Beach Department of Procurement 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 RE: Request for Qualifications for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Selection Committee: As the City of Miami Beach continues to grow, it is faced with significant challenges such as utility ca- pacity, improved stormwater systems,and increased service facilities.To provide their residents, busi- nesses,and tourists with the uninterrupted level of service they deserve and are accustomed to,Miami Beach is developing a library of professional architects and engineers to provide services in specialized categories on an"as-needed-basis"Wade Trim,Inc.,the Proposer for this Statement of Qualifications is excited to assist Miami Beach in the delivery of the project types discussed in the RFQ. Wade Trim,Inc.,is submitting this Statement of Qualifications for Qualification Group B-Engineering with the following areas of specialization: • Construction management • Cost estimating • Highways,streets,airfield paving, parking lots • Plumbing and piping design • Sewage collection,treatment,and disposal • Stormwater handling and facilities • Testing and inspection services • Water supply,treatment,and distribution Qualifications Summary Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida-based consulting engineering firm helping local and regional governments create livable,sustainable communities through practical and innovative solutions.Starting in 1926,Wade Trim completed utility designs for municipalities.As work grew in response to changing client needs,our staff and offices have expanded to more than 350 employees in 18 offices throughout the eastern United States.Wade Trim is consistently ranked among the top design and environmental firms and continues to be nationally recognized for innovative solutions.Nearly 90%of our business is from repeat clients,a testament to our commitment to client relationships.We are excited to extend our qualified staff in Miami,south Florida,the State of Florida,and throughout the eastern United States to assist Miami Beach in resolving its infrastructure challenges. Wade Trim, Inc. (p)786.505.6370 815 NW 57th Avenue (f)813.888.7215 Executive Office 200,Suite 06 www.wadetrim.com 1 Miami,FL 33126 B U I L D I N G R E L A T I O N S H I P S O N A F O U N D A T I O N O F E X C E L L E N C E Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an'As-Needed Basis" Cover Letter Page 2 Experience Summary Over the years,Wade Trim has completed a significant number of projects that include the services requested under this procurement.As a full-service firm,our civil engineering experience includes site development,stormwater control,traffic engineering,electrical,parking lot design,drive access,roadway design, permitting, water and wastewater treatment, reclaimed water distribution, utility design and relocation,pipelines,and plumbing.Wade Trim's ability to successfully complete these types of projects under an"as-needed-basis"contract has allowed us to maintain long-term continuing services contracts with more than 25 municipalities and clients throughout Florida alone.This experience shows that for us to be successful,all of our projects must be successful,meaning Wade Trim will not only understand the projects we are working on,but we will also stay abreast of other City projects,since they relate to the overall capital program the City delivers. Miami Beach is already familiar with some of Wade Trim's staff.Wade Trim is currently working on two neighborhood improvement projects in the City of Miami Beach as part of Design-Build teams. In the Sunset Harbour neighborhood, stormwater pump station and outfall improvements have been com- pleted and collection system improvements are currently underway.In addition to the drainage improve- ments,Wade Trim is providing design services for replacement of aging water main throughout the neighborhood and roadway improvements for 20th Street.Under separate contract,Wade Trim is Lead Designer for the Palm and Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Improvement Design-Build project.Through these Design-Build projects,we have become familiar with the City's standards and procedures and have had the opportunity to develop positive working relationships with several City of Miami Beach staff. Wade Trim is proud of our firm's background and experience,and appreciates the opportunity to submit this statement of qualifications to the City of Miami Beach.We look forward to continuing our profes- sional relationship while assisting the City in delivering the exciting project types discussed in the RFQ. In the Spirit of Service, WAS TRIM, IN , f , ,,, i /i 11 omas . Brzezi s ' ilt Executive Vice Presi ICT TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services El Group B—Engineering:Civil 1 . 1 Table of Contents I: 1 u Tab 1:Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Tab 3:Approach&Methodology Requirements Approach &Methodology 68 1.1 Cover Letter 1 Implementation Plan 68 1.1 Table of Contents 3 Schedule& Budget Management 1.2 Response Certification,Questionnaire, Through Effective &Requirements Affidavit 4 Project Management 69 1.3 Minimum Qualifications DBE Participation 72 Requirements 10 Minimum Eligibility Requirements10 Fi ures Wade Trim PE License 10 Figure 2.1.1 Wade Trim Services 18 Wade Trim Corporate Certificate 11 Figure 2.1.2 Continuing Services Clients 19 Staff Licenses 14 Figure 2.2.1 Project Manager Information ... 52 Tab 2:Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 17 Tables Firm History 17 Table 1.3.1 Wade Trim Personnel Minimum Qualifications 12 Firm Experience 17 Continuing Services Contract Table 2.2.1 Wade Trim Relevant Projects 53 Experience 19 Miami Beach Experience 19 Standard Form 330 19 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team 52 Project Manager 52 Design Engineering Lead 52 Wade Trim's Delivery Team 53 Organizational Chart 54 2.3 Financial Capacity 55 Supplier Qualification Report 56 INAT TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services EN Group B—Engineering:Civil 1 .2 Response Certification, > = Y 110 -; f� Questionnaire, & ,;. , - � r• _I...' ' .. ply !( � + r v. ui11 Requirements Affidavit Y Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000,Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez a�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Wade Trim, Inc. No of Years in Business: 88 No of Years in Business Locally: 30 No of Employees: 350 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 500 Griswold Avenue, Suite 2500 CITY: Detroit STATE: ZIP CODE: MI 48226 TELEPHONE NO.: 313.961.3650 TOLL FREE NO.: 888.499.9624 FAX NO.: 313.961.0898 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 815 NW 57th Avenue, Executive Office 200, Suite 06 CITY: Miami STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33126 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Tom Brzezinski, PE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 813.480.9000 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: 888.499.9624 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: tbrzezinski@wadetrim.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-2417170 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. T TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 4 Group B—Engineering:Civil 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES r NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. •6. • . ._ . ---• - --- - ''= - •- • _-- - • -- -- -- - " - -- -• - - - -•• ••- - •••:, ' ----• ••• S • •• U_ .. .e. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 \AADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Ell Group B—Engineering:Civil 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? V YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 1RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 ICJ WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 6 Group B—Engineering:Civil 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm R i Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 77} Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 V3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 3 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additi hal confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 DiT TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services El Group B—Engineering:Civil DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 ADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B—Engineering:Civil PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Res uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: To f/rzezin Executive Vice President Signs; of Proposer's u riz-.cepresentativ:. Date: o31(,'d A December 1, 2014 i State of FLORIDA ) On this 1 stday of December,2014 personally appeared before me Tom Brzezinski who County of Hillsborough ) stated that (s)he is the Executive Vice President of Wade Trim. Inc. , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Flon a Su E 0. 6 ET Z My Commission Expires: '-!S`/8' 40".: % SUE O.GEIZ =•: ,�, :*: MY COMMISSION#FF 121918 -= a: EXPIRES:August 15,2018 Bonded Thnr Notary. PuWia Undenyriters ,i RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 6 DIWADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 9 Group B-Engineering:Civil •1 . 3 Minimum Qualifications - �,., rte' ' +i II r ' ` = ,,„ . -mil „„.. �h -, r, ag 1 Requirements < !' , , �'� _ 3 �-. _��� �r . z .� it- ..-,-:E Minimum Eligibility Requirements Personnel Experience Wade Trim has furnished our qualifications to All of our engineers are licensed with the State of be selected by the City of Miami Beach to pro- Florida to perform engineering services. Please Y Y P vide services under Group B—Engineering.Please see page 14 for a copy of each team member's see below for additional eligibility requirements. professional license and Table 1.3.1 on page 12 for a listing of relevant completed projects for each Proposer Experience team member. Wade Trim was established in 1926. During our 88-year history, we have provided engineering and planning services to many municipalities throughout the United States and we have been serving Florida clients since 1984.A copy of Wade Trim's Professional Engineering license is included at the bottom of this page.On the following page is a copy of Wade Trim's Corporate Certificate. • State .o : � o-rl a Board of Professional- Erg ineers . . Attests that - .,Wade-,trim, Inca• , - FBPE: , " per 1;1=T I all:In is authorized under the provisions of Section:'71:023,Florida Statutes, to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. Expiration:2/28/2015 CA Lic.No: Audit No: 228201501737 Certificate of Authorization 3952 DI WADETRIl�i Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 10 Group B-Engineering:Civil Minimum Qualifications Requirements (continued) State ® Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that WADE TRIM, INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on May 31, 1984, effective June 1, 1984. The document number of this corporation is H05938. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on February 13, 2014, and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Y � Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Thirteenth day of February, 2014 it...,i, ';:,.1 '1•:...,,:,.. AN A , 16e4A. 04.4WwA Secretary of State Authentication ID:CC0782383540 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this ID,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.sunbia.org/certauthver.html IQW.�DETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services m Group B-Engineering:Civil Mhii mrm Ocala&&e o as Rec cements (ccM edi Table 1.3.1 Wade Trim Personnel Minimum Qualifications FL Team Member/Role License Years' l Completed Projects Number Experience • Hillsborough County SCADA Standards • Pasco Systems Utilities Expansion Holly Kremers,PE 68130 15 • Venice Water Main Replacement Program Project Manager 1• Seven Springs Master Lift Station Improvements • FGUA Lindrick Water System Improvements • Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services • Aloha Utility Acquisition Services Tom Brzezinski,PE 63602 25 " • Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection System QA/QC • Palm Bay Belt Filter Press • Palm Bay Energy Efficiency Study • Palm Bay WWTP/WRF Energy Efficiency Analysis Eddie Fontanin,PE • Palm Bay Reuse Master Plan Utility Master Planning 64869 19 • Palm Bay Energy Efficiency Study • Palm Bay Water Master Plan&Hydraulic Modeling • Barefoot Bay WTP Improvements • Monroe County Parks&Recreation Master Plan • Hillsborough County 2011-2016 Consolidated Plan Amanda Warner,AICP N/A 12 • Dunedin CRA Master Plan GIS/Mapping • Sumter County 2030 Community Visioning • Venice Land Development Code/Regulations Update • FGUA-Pasco County Utility Design • Mad Hatter System Mapping&Modeling Kurt Ahlgrim,PE Hydraulic Modeler 66987 12 • Palm Bay Energy Efficiency Study • Seven Springs Water System Modeling • Palm Bay Water Master Plan&Hydraulic Modeling • DEP Operating Permit Modification • Final Clarifier Refurbishment Dan Burden,Ph.D.,PE Design Engineer 53737 36 • Seven Springs Reclaimed Water System Improvements • Plantation Bay Utility Acquisition • Islamorada Wastewater Improvement Program • Biosolids Treatment&Disposal Study • Port St.John WWTP Clayton McCormack,PE 65473 20 ,• Palm Bay Energy Efficiency Study Design Engineer-Process • Troutman WWTP Improvements • Palm Bay Treatment Plant Condition Assessment • Waterway Estates • Del Prado WWTP Expansion&Force Main Extension Oscar Duarte,PE 60580 19 i • Plantation Bay Utility Engineering Assessment Design Engineer-Mechanical • Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection System • Del Prado Master Lift Station LS-01 I 1 ADEZ'RIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services El Group B-Engineering:Civil Milrdmum Ouanficv ions Re culvemeMs (co hhraed.) Table 1.3.1 Wade Trim Personnel Minimum Qualifications(continued) FL Years' Team Member/Role License Completed Projects Number Experience • Cross Bar Ranch Wel!field Pump Replacement • Crystal River Reclaimed Water Design Ricardo eo,PE 67101 15 • Venice Water Main Replacement Program Design Engineer • Northwest Hillsborough Pipeline • Peace River Phase 3A Pipe Design i ! • Del Prado WWTP Expansion&Force Main Extension • Barefoot Bay WWTF Operating Permit Renewal Chris Little,PE Design Engineer 61758 12 • Transmission Water Main Design&Permitting • Northeast Lift Station&Force Main Improvements • Minton Road Water Main Design • Hillsborough County SCADA Standards Alan Schwab,PE [• Palm Bay Lift Station Condition Assessment Electrical/Instrumentation 61313 21 • Waterway Estates • Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection System f _ l• SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications • East Tampa 22nd Street Corridor Enhancements • SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications John Kelley,PE 73984 7 • Druid Trail&Beach Connector Trail Design Roadway Engineer/MOT • Morningside Traffic Calming • CR 578 Multi-Lane Reconstruction • SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications • Seminole Tribe of Florida TIP Projects Steve Wallace,PE Roadway Engineer 59537 18 • US 27,Barry Road to US 192,Reconstruction • Nimes Avenue Intersection Improvements • 4th St N&112th Avenue Intersection Improvements • National Heritage Academies • Venice Traffic Study&Development Plan Reviews Aimee Giacherio,PE Traffic Engineer 72869 13 i • Battle Creek Downtown Traffic Study • Grand Haven Public Schools Safety Review • US 41 Venice Bypass Roadway&Bridge Improvements • KLWTD Vacuum Sewer Basin C Jeff Gilbert,PE I • Bay Point WWTP Construction Inspection 56646 21 • Islamorada Wastewater Program Implementation • Ocean Reef Club Low-Pressure Sewer Project • Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil )".,,i I : ‘ .. : : , State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Attests that Kurt R.Ahlgrim,P.E. Aimee Lynn Giacherio,P.E. 4 `4 Is licensed as a Professional ngineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes EspirOtiot:7.213V.15 P.E Lit.No: It stt,tsd as o ProAuoouoi Engineer undo Chapter 47t.naido Stances Audit Nn: 22212015 349 6,937 a. 2.128'2.115 ►tu.ur .y., 223201524575 72569 1 State of Florida State of Florida Board FPrf inEngineers d o o css o a l Board of Professional Engineers Attests[hot Attests tMot Ricardo G.Borromeo,P.E. Jeffrey A.Gilbert,P.E. i �l Is licensed as a Professional tinginecr under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/26/0 5 RE.Lie.No: is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Audit'do: 22620"502024 67101 Espirctioo:42424'5 o E.Lx.No: Au.it.N.) 22820 L327333 56644 State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Board of Professional Engineers Thomas Scott Brzezinski,P.E. Attests that I ijl,l John Thomas Kelley, P.E. Is licensed as a Professional ngtneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes '.- 7, Expiration:2i2&2015 P.E lie.No: is licensed as a Professional ngtneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Audit Nu: 228201516647 61602 Espiration:7,780Ct5 P.t.Lie No: Audit No; 725701524502 73984 ____ State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional_Engineers Attests shot Board of Professional Engineers Daniel George Burden, P.E. Attests Char Holly Patricia Kremers,P.E. FbPE- I ;ill is licensed as o Professional gtneerunder Chapter 471,Florida Statutes :.7'' :,:''. Expiration:2288515 P.E.Lie.Not Is licensed as o Professional veer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Audit No: 228201526911 53737 Expiration:2I2W575 P.E Lit.No: - Audit'Yo: 228201519966 65130 State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Attests that Oscar Emilio Duarte, P.E. ` Christopher Alan Little,P.E. i)l'( 1Ff13F Is licensed as o Professional ngtneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Is licensed as o Professional nglneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Ex trotion;2120 2015 p_E,itc.Nix Expirano+:2,'288015 P.5 Lie.No: P Aud t No 228471516427 67158 Audit Vox 228201523020 60580 —..— _ State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests Otos Attests that Edward George Fontanin,P.E. Clayton E.Mccormack,P.E. At , ,"t 1Bt1 Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Is licensed as a Professional ngtneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Esprcatan:7;,+4..1015 P.F.Irc.No: Expiration:212872015 Audit Na; !)4i01S29707 P.E.471 Fat864 Audit Na: 228201519755 65473 ILA Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 14 WADE•rRIM Group B-Engineering:Civil Staff Licenses continued) State ,Florida 0 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Allem that . Alan M.Schwab, P.E., Steven Lee Wallace,P.E. 1 Bit Is licensed as a Professional, ngineer u� Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Is licensed as a Professional ngineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/2829•5 : P.E.Lte.Nor Pspirnrinrn 2,2500:5 P.L.Lit.No: Audit Nat 228201519833 61313 Audit NO 228201527306 59537 State: of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Daniel I.Garcia,P.E: Is licensed as a Professional sneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes ETpirctian:2128120:5 P.E.tic,No: Audit Na: 225201311956 62299 This ccrrilic to h rr hv.q€iaiitics. Amanda Beth Warner, AICP as a member‘1`ith all the he nchiLS rd'a Certified Planner . and a commitment tei the A[CE2 Code of.Ethics and Piofessit n:1i Conduct. Certified_Planner Number 011183 Fakt ;raiN--1.A.NN . i',-;.:l 1,r:nar.i tli:t; [Latta 1t.+;lsr,::t1, tl[:l' l:..-x rii,. I)io_e(;:,h11=1 4.F4.} ITrt.,4;cric iiiiThe Air Ci cati Pl3+`irsr'q_Ac ociaa€ior:s r';otessiorltl l Ins tleure i® it American Institute of Certified Planners .4A7.>:P.rty Gros Carr r.:tnt_15,'*pper1 IN Professional Architectural&Engineering Services WADETRIM Group B-Engineering:Civil _ . . . . . • , • x erience Et Q • z.4. . • ualillcations 1 1 IsiAUETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil i ,: if ! �� 1 2...1 Qualifications of y Atm- osn Pro Firm Proposing Firm History tionships on a Foundation of Excellence."We strive Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida-based to become our clients'trusted advisor and to de- consulting engineering firm helping local velop solutions they can stand behind. 9 9 9 P 9 and regional governments create livable, sustain- In 1984,Wade Trim opened our first Florida office. able communities through practical and innovative Since then,we have become recognized as one of solutions.Wade Trim's staff has a history of solving Florida's most experienced engineering and design a multitude of utility challenges while always focus- firms. Our Florida staff is located throughout the ing on the environment and the improvement of State in Miami, Islamorada, Palm Bay, and Tampa our clients'infrastructure. offices. Staff in our Miami office will take the lead Starting in 1926, we completed utility designs for in working with Miami Beach, allowing us to be municipalities.As work grew in response to chang- responsive to the City's project needs. ing client needs, our staff and offices expanded Firm Experience through new client growth.Today,Wade Trim em- ploys more than 350 people in 18 offices in Florida, Wade Trim's 88-year existence in the engineering Michigan,Missouri,Nebraska,North Carolina,Ohio, community provides us with a wealth of knowledge Pennsylvania,and Texas.Our expertise has grown dealing with numerous civil projects.Our civil experi- to provide a full range of professional services to ence includes site development,stormwater control, meet the infrastructure needs of governmental, traffic engineering, electrical, parking lot design, commercial,and industrial clients.We have evolved drive access,roadway design,permitting,water and to become a firm of engineers, planners, scien- wastewater treatment,reclaimed water distribution, tists,surveyors, landscape architects,and support utility design and relocation,pipelines,and pumping. staff who solve a multitude of environmental and Over the years, our firm has completed a signifi- infrastructure problems.We have extensive expe- cant number of projects that include the services rience evaluating, designing, and rehabilitating requested under this procurement and listed in infrastructure systems. Along with our clients,we Figure 2.1.1.The combined expertise of develop- have been recognized with numerous professional ing these services and applying them to projects design awards including a national award from the included in our SF 330 gives the City a professional American Consulting Engineers Council. engineering services firm that can deliver a broad Wade Trim is consistently ranked in the top design range of projects under this procurement. and environmental firms and continues to be na- tionally recognized for innovative solutions.Wade Trim was recently ranked 244th in Engineering News Record's ranking of the nation'sTop 500 design firms 9 P 9 as well as 168th for environmental firms.Trenchless Technology ranks us 29th on their list of Top 50 Trenchless Design Firms. Nearly 90%of our business is from repeat clients, a testament to our commitment to client relation- ships.Our belief in strong relationships is reflected in our corporate vision statement,"Building Rela- IWADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B—Engineering:Civil Qualifications of Proposing Fir jcontinued) Figure 2.1.1 Wade Trim Services Roadway Design WadeTrim helps communities keep pedestrian and • Stormwater handling and facilities vehicular traffic flowing by integrating local issues • Water supply,treatment,and distribution into overall solutions to deliver context-sensitive • Sewage collection,treatment,and disposal designs.We have been instrumental in improving • Plumbing and piping design roadways and transportation projects for client • Electrical/instrumentation municipalities, counties, and Departments of • Highways,streets,airfield paving,parking lots Transportation. Our experience includes traffic signalization, pedestrian signals, roadway design • Cost estimating and resurfacing, and sidewalk and trail designs. • Testing and inspection services It spans intersection improvements for increased • Construction management road capacity to widening of urban arterials.Proac- • Heating,ventilating,air conditioning tive public involvement,detailed analyses of exist- • Lighting (exterior,streets) ing conditions,and consideration of communities' needs make Wade Trim a design leader. • Recreation facilities(parks,marinas,etc.) • Structural design/special structures Stormwater • Energy conservation There are few projects in Florida that do not have stormwater impacts.Consequently,Wade Trim has General Civil&Facility Engineering focused on building a seasoned surface water man- Our civil engineering expertise includes site design agement team.Our services include drainage basin and permitting for infrastructure, commercial, in- studies, master drainage plans, floodplain map- dustrial,and residential projects;project manage- ping, storm sewer design and engineering, open ment; feasibility studies; and utility coordination. drainage systems, pumping stations, retention/ Wade Trim has worked on numerous sites to ad- detention basins, dams and protective dikes, lake dress a variety of issues, including infrastructure, level control, stormwater permitting/compliance driveway access, traffic impact, warrant studies, services, and stormwater management. Our staff and signal design. Wade Trim can assist the City use current modeling software and enjoy strong, with site plan reviews and act as an extension of its longstanding working relationships with SFWMD, staff at DRC meetings, interagency meetings,and FDEP,and USACOE. City Council meetings,as needed. Electrical Services Utilities Design WadeTrim provides full-service electrical,instrumen- Wade Trim's diverse background in utility design tation and control (I&C), and SCADA services rang- provides our clients with a single firm knowledge- ing from feasibility studies to designing, installing, able in all facets of utilities'needs.Our experience calibrating, and operating complex, computerized includes distribution and conveyance, and reha- instrumentation of water resources systems.In fact, bilitation and expansion of existing systems.Wade Wade Trim is licensed as an electrical contractor in Trim is proficient in developing alternative analy- some locations,providing construction,start-up,and ses to identify the most cost-effective treatment follow-up services.These capabilities help meet the technology or the most practical utility corridor, time-sensitive needs of sophisticated l&C systems. depending on the project at hand.Our experience Staff can design, install, and provide support for extends into several areas of sanitary sewer reha- system integration, man/machine interfacing, and bilitation including pipe i bursting, sliplining, and l&C systems. 9 other forms of in-situ repairs. Our firm also has a significant amount of experience working on utility relocation projects in support of roadway or other related infrastructure improvement projects. WA�ETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil Qualifications of Proposing Firm (continued) Construction Management Figure 2.1.2 Continuing Services Clients After properly completing the preliminary and de- sign engineering processes,the construction man- Cities agement phase involves processing shop drawings, ° Cocoa • Dunedin documenting construction,ensuring construction • Islamorada • Largo is completed in accordance with plans and speci- • North Port • Ormond Beach fications, responding to Requests for Information • Palm Bay • Palm Coast (RFIs), processing pay requests, preparing O&M • Port Orange • Tampa manuals, training staff, and preparing as-built • Venice • West Melbourne drawings. To ensure successful implementation of the preliminary engineering and design,Wade Counties Trim includes the following during the construction • Brevard Charlotte management phase: provide contractor bidding • Citrus Flagler and selection services and construction contract • Hillsborough • Lee documents, perform pre-construction and prog- • Pinellas • Polk ress meeting summaries, stormwater pollution Others prevention plans and NDPES Notice of Intent,shop • Florida Dept. • Florida drawing submittals and responses, payment ap- of Transportation Governmental plications,notice of substantial completion,permit District 5 Utility Authority certifications,O&M manual,as-built drawings,and • North Key Largo • Seminole Tribe notice of final completion. Utility Corporation of Florida Continuing Services Contract Miami Beach Experience Experience Wade Trim is currently working on two neighbor- WadeTrim's ability to provide successful continuing hood improvement projects in the City of Miami services contracts stems from our programmatic Beach as part of Design-Build teams. In the Sunset approach to delivering related services. Our ex- Harbour neighborhood, stormwater pump station perience shows that for us to be successful, all of and outfall improvements have been completed and our projects should be successful, meaning Wade collection system improvements are currently under- Trim will not only understand the projects we are way.In addition to the drainage improvements,Wade working on, but we will also stay abreast of other Trim is providing design services for replacement of City projects,since they relate to the overall capital aging water main throughout the neighborhood program the City delivers.This programmatic deliv- and roadway improvements for 20th Street. Under ery approach on continuing services contracts en- separate contract,Wade Trim is Lead Designer for sures that all City projects will be well coordinated the Palm and Hibiscus Islands neighborhood im- BEFORE a shovel of dirt is turned. provement Design-Build project. Our success in delivering continuing services con- Through these Design-Build projects, we have tracts is highlighted by the number of continuing become familiar with the City's standards and pro- services contracts we currently hold with other cedures and have had the opportunity to develop entities around the state of Florida. In most cases, positive working relationships with several City of these contracts have been held for several years, Miami Beach staff. and their options to extend for additional terms have been exercised numerous times.Figure 2.1.2 Standard Form 330 is an abbreviated list of Wade Trim's continuing Please find Wade Trim's Standard Form 330 on the services contracts for the State of Florida. following page. Contained within the Standard Form 330 are resumes for each staff member listed on the organizational chart and six relevant, recently completed projects. IQWADE TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 19 Group B—Engineering:Civil ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Architectural &Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis"(Miami Beach, FL 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER September 19, 2014 RFQ 2014-346-YG B.ARCHITECT ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Thomas Brzezinski, Executive Vice President 5.NAME OF FIRM Wade Trim 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS 786.505.6370 813.888.7215 tbrzezinski @wadetrim.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors) (Check) OP 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS I I.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT a ?< j� 815 NW 57th Avenue a. Wade Trim, Inc. Executive Office 200, Suite 06 Prime Miami, FL 33126 b. c. d. e. f. g. h. D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM is (Attached) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION MANDATORY USE DATE OF FORM 6/2004 WADETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 20 I N L _ o T2 a .. a C V 0 C au •i C O E tAcu o a, u W u E 7, 01 N 7 v.) fd Q Q U C C R C O 1J W C L 3 a ITS U L J C N *. C l 'cr). � m ,� 0 R _ ra R V 3 a, c -C c w v CU -C o a Y 0 V C O' N O a` N a m c c 0 0 E •_ i u CU3 w aa,, 0 0a c p v 7 v c O v , O a(ft) • p- C o2S u � O a) ( 0 c C < 11 al O o \ u E rn Ln j a+ V C 4, a, 11,' R C ru V ! , ' w I a.W. > Q vl 1- cc H N LL W G U = G 1— u 0 c iO u =c 92 W a �, Y Q� w a, >CD >. C w a w E `°�C _ a w a w w w a a w .� Y Q aJ p ,a a g a aw a s o C a Y p a, HH I a1 H Q t v c cc � 2 ` 00 Q ut N C l' C a, a, m m C U h- L ,CC L > y Y O Q v 0 x u ¢ 0 v, Q 0 a.. w E ._ L rn 1,— c a c C Tr _m CO a a o • g - Y ` 2 V1 D 0 = U a+ L O a. a. a • W _u N1 a ¢ a w C 6 > c a, E Y 10 Z t6 7, .0 vi LL N Q CU -0 Y_ C w E Y Q IQ T TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services El Group B—Engineering:Civil E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) • 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Holly Kremers, PE Project Manager a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 6 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science, Environmental Engineering, PE: Florida, No. 68130 Michigan Technological University; Bachelor of Science, Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Affiliations—American Water Works Association;AWWA Region IV Executive Committee Member, Water for People Committee Chair;AWWA Water Quality and Resources Division Chair;American Society of Civil Engineers Awards—AWWA Region IV Volunteer of the Year, 2012; Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers Engineering Excellence Award, 2013; Water for People Kenneth J. Miller Founders Award, 2014 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Hillsborough County SCADA Standards (f pp ) (Tampa, FL) 2014 N/A a 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE IE1 Check if project performed with current firm• The Hillsborough County Public Utilities Department retained Wade Trim under a continuing service contract for electrical and instrumentation services to develop SCADA standards for the County.Led a team of civil process,mechanical,and electrical engineers in development of the standards to ensure they were considered from all disciplines. Standards were developed for SCADA integration, control philosophy, HMI screens, P&IDs, and PLCs. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pasco Systems Utilities Expansion PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Port Richey, FL) 2011 2011 b. 3 B IEF DES RIPTIQN(Brief copy,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE, E! Check if project performed with current firm Master planning,utility improvements,&expansion of FGUA's water&wastewater utility,formerly known as Aloha Utilities. System serves approx. 12,000 water&wastewater customers.Created water/sewer maps&developed a hydraulic model of entire system. Included design, permitting, &construction management of 50,000'of 12"dia. PVC line improvements throughout the system.Also designed combination of open-cut&trenchless technology installations to minimize cost& impacts to neighboring communities. Lines were placed in County and FDOT right-of-ways(ROWs). Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Water Main Replacement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Venice, FL) 2014 2015(est.) C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ID Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim developed a phased water main replacement program for the City of Venice to address aging infrastructure concerns and to relocate water mains from rear-lot easements to the right-of-way for ease of access.The phasing was developed to divide the area into eight projects that are similar in cost,and to first address areas that are experiencing water main breaks or water quality/pressure issues.After completing the phasing program, Wade Trim was selected for design and construction oversight of the second phase. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR C.OMPLEI ED Seven Springs Master Lift Station Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2012 N/A d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm FGUA's Seven Springs Wastewater Treatment Facility(WWTF)was experiencing issues with master lift station overflow during power outages. The small wet well capacity allowed less than a minute from high level indication to overflow during peak flow conditions. Wade Trim prepared an alternatives analysis of several remedies including a stand-by diesel pump,wet well expansion,and passive gravity overflow to the reject pond. FGUA opted for the gravity overflow to prevent overflows without reliance on mechanical equipment. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FGUA Lindrick Water System Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2012 2014 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Evaluated and design an interconnection with the City of New Port Richey's utility system. As part of the system evaluation, Wade Trim developed a hydraulic model to verify the selected location of the interconnection, and to determine how the system would behave with distribution system modifications that were required to convert to a compatible disinfection system. In addition,the hydraulic model was used to verify fire flow pressures at various points in the system after the distribution system modifications were implemented Project Manager Wt1DET1.1 i STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 22 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 1 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Tom Brzezinski, PE QA/QC a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 25 24 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) MBA, Management/Finance Wayne State University; PE: Florida, No. 63602 BSCE, Michigan State University 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Affiliations—Design-Build Institute of America; DBIA Water National Committee member; Water Environment Federation; National Society of Professional Engineers; National Association of Clean Water Agencies Presentations—FWRC—"Emerging Issues to Improve Water Quality"—"Village of Islamorada Vacuum Sewers: Imorovin. Water Qualit in the Florida Ke s." 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2014 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I3 Check if project performed with current firm Assisting in soliciting procurement of DBOF vendors to design, build, operate, &finance work.Addressing necessary activities for development of a DCP for use as a component of a DBOF procurement strategy. Includes development of technical portions of noted DCP document, meetings with Village and its legal counsel(s), bidding assistance with RFQ/RFP review, technical review of DBOF proposals, &support services during the negotiation phase of selected DBOF team. Value engineering is a key component of project delivery to k ep project costs down. Project Director. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Aloha Utility Systems Acquisition Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Port Richey, FL) 2011 N/A b. 3. RIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Ei Check if project performed with current firm Struggling to maintain adequate customer service at its existing rate structure, utility ownership and concerned citizen • groups were looking at options to improve water quality. Managed efforts to complete in-depth due diligence of system, including utility condition assessments,O&M techniques,short-and long-term capital needs,and overall system compliance. Recommendations led to the acquisition of the system with itemized CIP projects and improved O&M strategies that led to a rate structure consistent with covenants made between the utility owner and its customer base. Project Manager. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Middle Plantation Key Vacuum Sewer Collection System PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2010 2012 C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for permitting,scheduling coordination,design,and construction administration of the wastewater collection system for central service area of Plantation Key for the Village of Islamorada.The vacuum collection system consisted of approximately 6 miles of vacuum collection piping and the construction of a vacuum pump station and force main transmission piping. Principal-in-Charge. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) YEAR Belt Filter Press Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If-applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2009 2010 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Evaluated previous consultant's plans and specifications to determine if construction cost-saving alternatives could be identified and incorporated into the design so that the project could be completed within the City's budget. The evaluation was completed within 30 days and several cost-saving alternatives were identified. Palm Bay ultimately procured the services of Wade Trim to incorporate these cost saving ideas into the previous consultant's plans and specifications.The re-design resulted in identified savings ofnearly 30%of he original bid price. Principal-in-Charge. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Energy Efficiency Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE lZ Check if project performed with current firm Performed technical analysis of different treatment methods and processes, including fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options (course bubble aeration) and variable blower air flow rate (aerobic)options.Analysis of each item quantified the energy cost of its current operation,provided a desktop analysis of process modifications,and quantified the life cycle costs/payback period of any recommended process modifications. The City has seen a 31% reduction in its energy consumption at the wastewater treatment facilities thus far. Project Director/PIC. 1DETR1M STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 23 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Edward Fontanin, PE Utility Master Planning a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 19 17 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) I 6.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BS Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, PE: Florida, No. 68602 Ontario 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) FWEA Reuse Committee; National Association of Sewer Service Companies;American Water Works Association; Society of American Military Engineers;American Public Works Association 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Wastewater Treatment Plant/Water Reclamation Facility Energy PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Efficiency Analysis (Palm Bay, FL) 2013 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE III Check if project performed with current firm Performed efficiency evaluation of current operations practices & treatment processes looking for energy-saving opportunities. Performed following technical evaluations: fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options, &variable blower air flow rate for aerobic digestion. Reviewed the O&M manuals for existing surface aerators & developed a typical &design CBO/NH3 influent loading pattern. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Reuse Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2009 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim prepared a reuse master plan to determine which area of the reuse system needed to be expanded in order to meet the demands of future developments.The modeling used for this master plan was an expansion from the wastewater modeling. Doing so enabled the modeling to take into account the intake to the wastewater plant and the reuse available to be used for distribution. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Energy Efficiency Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Performed technical analysis of different treatment methods and processes, including fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options (course bubble aeration) and variable blower air flow rate (aerobic) options.Analysis of each item quantified the energy cost of its current operation,provided a desktop analysis of process modifications,and quantified the life cycle costs/payback period of any recommended process modifications. The City has seen a 31% reduction in its energy consumption at the wastewater treatment facilities thus far. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR LOMPLE FED Water Master Plan &Hydraulic Modeling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2012 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim used WaterGEMS along with field measurements in the City's water system to establish a transient model of the City's water distribution system. Future development was input in the model to simulate future demands. With the assistance of this model the City was able to establish its Five-and 10-year Capital Improvement Projects. Project Manager. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Barefoot Bay Water Treatment Plant Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Brevard County, FL) 2013 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE L( Check if project performed with current firm Studied and designed upgrade and expansion of a 0.225 MGD VVWTF for Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) to meet AWT effluent limits and to implement effluent reuse. Existing treatment process was retrofit with a four-stage Bardenpho biological treatment system.Responsible for leading evaluation and selection of the biological process and its design,as well as the design of the treatment scheme utilizing as much of the existing tankage and treatment works as possible.New secondary clarifiers,effluent filters,and chlorination facilities are also part of this project.Project Manager. Wr1DETium STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 24 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 1 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Amanda Warner,AICP GIS/Mapping a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 12 12 I 5.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) I 6.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BA, Studio Art, Hollins University, 2000 American Institute of Certified Planners 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations:American Planning Association Training: Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Energy Conservation I: Comprehensive Planning Under Florida's HB 697 (Sponsored by University of Florida Program for Resource-Efficient Communities), 2010; Form-Based Codes Institute (FBI)'s ABCs of FBCs:An Introduction to Form-Based Coding, 2010 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hillsborough County 2011-2016 Consolidated Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2011 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 8 Check if project performed with current firm Assisted in the development of the County's 2011-2016 Five-Year Consolidated Plan to allocate more than$2 million in CDBG funds annually. Provided GIS/mapping,demographic and housing market analysis,and prepared Housing and Homeless sections of the Plan. Prepared materials for and facilitated public involvement efforts, including stakeholder and advisory board meetings. Planner. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Dunedin CRA Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Dunedin, FL) 2010 N/A b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if project performed with current firm Updated City's Downtown CRA Master Plan by evaluating plan outcomes since the CRA's inception in 1988. The update process involves further engaging local stakeholders in a long-term vision for the Downtown and recommending strategies for the next 10 years. Responsibilities include GIS mapping and analysis of existing conditions such land use,zoning,vacant properties,parking areas,and open space;facilitation of community workshops to gather input from the public regarding the past. present. and future of the Downtown: and up ating the master plan document. Planner. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Monroe County Parks&Recreation Master Plan for the"Florida Keys" PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Monroe County, FL) 2012 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Ei Check if project performed with current firm Compiled background Info, generated level of service standards, incorporated Livable CommuniKeys, programmed plans into the overall desires and direction for the future, &applied public input received from a series of workshops in order to recommend redevelopment of existing parks and placement of future parks. Generated maps using GIS to establish geographic character&pattern of parks properties in order to supplement recommended service areas. Finalized report&developed Executive Summary brochure for public distribution. Planner. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLE FED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sumter County 2030 Community Visioning (Sumter County, FL) 2009 N/A d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Assisted in development of a Countywide Vision Plan for a County confronted by the intersection of its rural legacy and recent urban influences. Generated a series of land use, socioeconomic, and environmental maps to create a "snap shot"of the County to facilitate discussion about the community's past,present,and future.Facilitated four public workshops to identify common concerns and goals through a series of exercises.Compiled background research and public participation results to produce a final report for presentation to the County. Planner. 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Land Development Code/Regulations Update PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Venice, FL) 2012 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I f Check if project performed with current firm Assisted the City of Venice in implementing a Comprehensive Plan through draft updates to the City's code, including the development of standards for building height, Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) development, non-conforming uses and structures, on-and off-street parking,affordable&workforce housing density bonus,&a conversion factor for special needs housing.Researched best practices and case studies for respective standards,revised&updated existing code, &met with City staff&Planning Commission to build consensus regarding proposed code changes. Planner. 101 wt1D�TR1�'I STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 25 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Kurt Ahlgrim, PE Hydraulic Modeling a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 12 8 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, Michigan State University;Associate's in Architectural PE: Florida, No. 66987 Technology, Lansing Community College Qualified Stormwater Management Inspector I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications.Organizations,TrainingAwards,etc.) Florida Engineering Society; National Society of Professional Engineers 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FGUA-Pasco County Utility Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2011 2011 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E7 Check if project erformed with current firm The 1st utility project included design of 5 interconnections between the FGUA and Pasco County water systems. Interconnections consisted of above grade meter and valve assemblies,plus associated underground piping.Two miles of WM extension were required to complete the interconnections.The 2nd project included design of a WTP upgrade. The treatment plant was upgraded from a direct chlorination, ground storage, and repumping facility to include forced- draft aeration with odor control, associated PH adjustment, pressure filtration, and chloramination. Design Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Mad Hatter System Mapping &Modeling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Land O'Lakes, FL) 2012 N/A b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brie scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if performed with current firm Compiled record drawings and other utility records to make system maps and develop a hydraulic model of the water distribution system. The hydraulic model was used to develop an operational matrix of which water system wells could be taken out of service for maintenance and/or repair consecutively.The model was used as a tool to determine optimal location for a future interconnection with the neighboring Pasco County water system in the event that FGUA was required to connect to the County's supply and purchase supplemental water. Hydraulic Modeler. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Energy Efficiency Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Performed technical analysis of different treatment methods and processes, including fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options (course bubble aeration) and variable blower air flow rate (aerobic) options.Analysis of each item quantified the energy cost of its current operation,provided a desktop analysis of process modifications,and quantified the life cycle costs/payback period of any recommended process modifications. The City has seen a 31% reduction in its energy consumption at the wastewater treatment facilities thus far. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLE1 ED Seven Springs Water System Modeling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2010 N/A d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE a Check if roject performed with current firm The original system was expenencing two issues: poor water quality and water usage that exceeded the permitted groundwater withdrawal capacity. Developed a hydraulic model to determine the most cost-effective solution for the water system issues. The model was instrumental in locating a centralized WTF so all areas of the system could be served with adequate pressure. The hydraulic model developed is now used by FGUA as a valuable tool in verifying available water supply and fire flow for new development within the distribution system. Hydraulic Modeler. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Water Master Plan & Hydraulic Modeling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2012 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim used WaterGEMS along with field measurements in the City's water system to establish a transient model of the City's water distribution system. Future development was input in the model to simulate future demands. With the assistance of this model the City was able to establish its Five-and 10-year Capital Improvement Projects.Hydraulic Modeler. t1DETKL�1 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 26 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FO'RTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Michael Reineke, El Drainage/Stormwater a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 19 14 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, University of South Florida Registered Engineering Intern, Florida, No. 1197ET173 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,TrainingAwards,etc.) Organizations: Florida Stormwater Association Training: Site Development Permitting in Manatee County, 2004; FES-"How to Get a Permit the First Time," May 2004;ASCE- Pumping Systems Design for Civil Engineers, March 2004 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SR 60 from Turkey Creek to Clarence Gordon Jr. Road Resurfacing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (RRR) (Tampa, FL) 2011 2013 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE © Check if project performed with current firm Provided design services to prepare construction plans, specifications,estimates,and permits for SR 60 from Turkey Creek Road to Clarence Gordon Jr. Road.This was a RRR project,which included pavement rehabilitation (mill and resurface), upgrade of signing and pavement markings, upgrade of signalization at two intersections, sidewalks, bike lanes, drainage improvements modeled in ICPR, and environmental permitting. Drainage Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Canal Road PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Manatee County, FL) 2010 2011 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if project performed with current firm In partnership with Florida Power & Light (FPL), replaced a 1,300-foot segment of open trapezoidal-shaped roadside ditch (approximately 10' deep and 30'wide)with 38" x 60" elliptical reinforced concrete pipe(RCP). This change to a closed-conduit system was necessary to provide access to new high-tension poles FPL installed within the area occupied by the open roadside ditch. New culverts were designed to carry existing flow rate in the ditch of 164 cf/s, which was generated from the surrounding 221-acre drainage basin.Water quality treatment was also included in the design. Drainage Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US 41 Reconstruction Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Pasco County, FL) 2010 2010 C. 3._BRIEF DESRI ION(Brief s o ze,cast,etc.) ND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm The project consisted o€s miles or two-lane rural to four-lane rural reconstruction. It is designed to be expandable to six lanes in the future and includes drainage,a 12-foot-wide shared-use path,two-span bridge/wildlife crossing, subsurface utility engineering (SUE),three box culverts,and environmental permitting.The project requires coordination with adjacent major DRIs,to ensure that median openings and geometry accommodate planned development. Drainage design, floodplain mitigation, stormwater ponds, conveyance system design,and access management considerations are key design features. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLEI ED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sr 585 Urban Modifications/Lane Reduction (Tampa, FL) 2014 2016(est.) d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project limits extend from SR 60 to Hillsborough Ave and are defined by 3 distinct typical sections. The first extends 1 mile from SR 60 to E 21st Ave and looks at lane reductions on 21st and 22nd St. Reviewed all existing drainage infra- structure,video reports, recommendations, and cost alternatives. Developed recommendations to repair, rehab,and re- place storm drain and drainage structures along the corridor.Responsible for drainage plans production,drainage report, cost estimating, and managing all drainage issues through the project's life c cle. Drainage Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED CR 578(County Line Road)Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Pasco/Hernando Counties, FL) 2010 2010 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE rzt Check if project performed with current firm Drainage design for 4.9 miles of proposed four-lane rural roadway. Design issues include Karst topography, closed basins, and limited available sites for ponds. Responsibilities include modeling of existing and proposed drainage conditions, plans generation, and acquiring district and SWFWMD permits. Project limits are from Mariner Boulevard to the Suncoast Parkway. Drainage Engineer ` w�Tlu,�t STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 27 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Daniel Garcia, PE Design Engineering Lead a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 10 <1 I S.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Miami, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, University of Florida; MS, Civil Engineering, PE: Florida, No. 62299 Oregon State University; MBA, New York University LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Affiliations: Cuban-American Association of Civil Engineers;American Society of Civil Engineers; Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers 9.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade Public Schools General Obligation Bonds Renovations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Miami, FL) 2014 Ongoing a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Led team of engineers as the civil engineering subconsultant on this multi-year contract to renovate various MDCPS facilities. Work included design and construction management for parking lot renovations, drainage improvements, and various other civil/site renovations. Civil Engineering Lead. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NE 203rd Street&NE 215th Street Intersection Improvements between PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) US-1 &West Dixie Highway PD&E Study (Miami, FL) 2014 2014 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Led team that performed origin-destination studies,speed studies,queue studies,and traffic data collection(bidirectional • volume counts, turning movement counts). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the potential grade separation at the Florida East Coast(FEC)Railway line crossings of NE 203rd Street/Ives Dairy Road and/or NE 215th Street to eliminate vehicle conflicts with existing freight and future passenger trains of the FEC Railway,while'enhancing traffic operations and safety conditions in the area. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Safety Memorandum for Intersection Improvements at SW 120th Street PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) &SW 122nd Avenue (Miami, FL) 2013 2013 C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if ro project erformed with current firm Work scope included a traffic safety study at the intersection of SW 122nd Avenue and p SW 120th Street in Miami- Dade County. MDPW identified the intersection as a high-crash location. The purpose of the safety study was to ex- plore opportunities to obtain Federal safety funding from the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)through the Local Agency Program (LAP)for use in improving safety and operations of the intersection. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (1)YEAR C.OMPLE FED Rural Gravity-Fed Water Supply Systems PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Honduras) 2011 2012 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Led topographic survey, detailed design, and cost estimating of several rural water supply systems for the intermu- nicipal technical unit of COLOSUCA. Coordinated project financing of projects with foundations and international nongovernmental organizations. Environment&Water Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Gracias Water&Sewer System Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Honduras) 2011 2012 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Work included review of bid materials and development of RFP package for USD 2 million expansion and rehabilita- tion program in conjunction with municipal authorities and technical consultants representing a bilateral financing organization. Environment&Water Engineer. 114 WADE: •RIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 28 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Daniel Burden, Ph.D., PE Design Engineer a.TOTAL I 1b.wITH CURRENT FIRM 36 2 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Ph.D., Civil/Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State PE: Florida, No. 53737 University; ME, Civil/Environmental Engineering, Louisiana tY 9 State University; BS, Biology/Chemistry, Harding University 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Water Environmental Federation (WEF)WEF Reuse Committee; Florida Pollution Control Federation;American Water Works Association; Florida Engineering Society; National Society of Professional Engineers 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED DEP Operating Permit Modification for Blending of NF Concentrate PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Beach County, FL) 2010 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Prepared and obtained WW operating permit renewal on behalf of the Loxahatchee River District's newly expanded 11 MGD diffused aeration treatment plant facility. Facility included 13 reclaimed water users as part of this permit for a reclaimed water capacity of 12 MGD.Three surface water discharge locations are included as part of this permit for the reclaimed system. This 5-year operating permit is unique in that the permit allows for the reuse and disposal of 3 MGD of demineralized concentrate from the neighboring Town of Jupiter WTP nanofiltration system. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Final Clarifier Refurbishment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Boca Raton, FL) 2011 2012 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm The project was a$2.7M refurbishment of five final clarifiers at the City's wastewater treatment facilities. Replacement • of all clarifier mechanisms,electrical,instrumentation,bridge walkways,.lighting,chlorine dosing systems,and lightning protection are included as part of this ongoing improvement project. Project Director. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seven Springs Reclaimed Water System Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Port Richey, FL) 2012 2014 C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project included construction of a 3-million gallon ground storage tank and associated improvements,with nearly 2,000 lineal feet of reclaimed water line. Construction of an interconnection between the Seven Springs reclaimed system and the neighboring Pasco County reclaimed system for wet weather disposal, included approximately 3,000 lineal feet of reclaimed main extension. Design Team Member&Technical Reviewer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR C.OMPLEI ED Plantation Bay Utility Acquisition PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Bunnell, FL) 2013 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief,scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if roject performed with current firm Engineering due diligence of the water and wastewater utility assets at Plantation Bay Utility as part of the Flagler County and City of Bunnell acquisition. Conducted field inspections, facility evaluations, review of pertinent operating and compliance records, and identified capital improvement projects required as part of due diligence. Inspections and evaluations were conducted on all water and wastewater facilities, including storage tanks, pumping stations, lift stations, and water supply wells. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Wastewater Improvement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (lslamorada, FL) 2013 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Cif Check if project performed with current firm Design-Build-Operate centralized wastewater collection system under construction.Engineering plan reviews completed for vacuum sewer collection systems and low-pressure collection sewer systems designed for construction.Additional evaluations completed for alternative collection systems located in isolated areas. Responsibilities also include development of Village Utility Policy Manual, Minimum Design and Construction Standards and Specifications, and Grinder Pump Specifications for DBO contract documents.Technical Review Committee Member. 1.1 ` ADETRL�1 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 29 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTH'S CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Clayton McCormack, PE Design Engineer—Process a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 20 17 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) n Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and ( MS, Environmental Engineering, Michigan State PE: Florida, No. 65473 Wesleyan University; BS, Chemistry, Illinois o s University 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Water Environment Federation;American Chemical Society;American Water Works Association; International Ozone Association F9.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Biosolids Treatment&Disposal Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2011 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE O Check if joroject performed with current firm Knowing the revisions to Chapter 62-640 FAC biosolids regulations were going to increase the cost of biosolids disposal in the State of Florida, the City of Palm Bay requested the assistance of Wade Trim to complete a study to identify"right size"treatment options to produce Class NM biosolids Six treatment processes were selected for detailed investigation to develop a planning level projection of the treatment and disposal costs associated with each process. Process Lead. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Port St. John Wastewater Treatment Plant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Port St. John, FL) 2014 2015(est.) b. 3.BRI F DESCRIPTION(Brief scope size,co etc)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if project performed with current firm WW treatment occurs within a bib diameter ring steel tank split into aeration&digestion zones around a secondary clarifier.The tank needed significant rehab after 20 years of service.WT helped design improvements to an existing secondary digester tank to convert it into an aeration basin, forming a new standby secondary biological treatment train.This was the most cost-effective solution to provide continued treatment of the influent WW to the facility while an existing ring steel treatment tank is being taken out of service for several months for extensive rehab, including removal of tank coating that contains heavy metals.Lead Process Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Energy Efficiency Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Performed technical analysis of different treatment methods and processes, including fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options (course bubble aeration) and variable blower air flow rate (aerobic)options.Analysis of each item quantified the energy cost of its current operation,provided a desktop analysis of process modifications,and quantified the life cycle costs/payback period of any recommended process modifications. The City has seen a 31% reduction in its energy consumption at the wastewater treatment facilities thus far. Pr cess Lead. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (1)YEAR C.OMPLE1 ED Troutman Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2012 Ongoing d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE In Check if project performed with current firm Assessed operations and condition of the City's 4 MGD WWTP. Effort performed to identify and program projects catered to replacing outdated equipment and make operational efficiency improvements to the plant. Several projects were identified and implemented,including replacement of the WWTP generator,grit classifier and screening conveyor, surface aerators at the aerobic digester, of aerators at the secondary treatment, and overall improvements to the WWTP's electrical and instrumentation system. Lead Process Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Treatment Plant Condition Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2011 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm To prepare project budgets for future facility improvements,Wade Trim performed an independent condition assessment of the City's three treatment facilities for the purpose of identifying and prioritizing the condition of the facilities. The early work is being expanded upon by the City to prepare a five-year needs assessment to justify funding future facility improvements projects. Process Lead. ` ADETRBI STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 30 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Oscar Duarte, PE Design Engineer—Mechanical a.TOTAL I 1b.WITHURRENT FIRM 19 I 5 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) MS, Environmental Engineering, University of Central PE: Florida, No. 60580 Florida BS, Mechanical Engineering, University of Florida I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Society of Mechanical Engineers;Water Environment Federation 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Waterway Estates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Fort Myers, FL) 2012 2013 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I7 Check if project performed with current firm Assisted FGUA in expanding its wastewater collection infrastructure by 1 million GPD to collect flows from the Waterway Estates service area. Expansion included installation of approx. 8 miles of FM and construction of an intermediate pump station to send flows from the Waterway Estates WWTP, soon to be decommissioned, to the newly expanded Del Prado WWTP located in North Fort Myers. Responsible for preparation of the Design Criteria Package(DCP)and construction engineering services. start-up. and project close-out. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Del Prado Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion &Force Main PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Extension (North Fort Myers, FL) 2012 2013 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for expanding and upgrading the Del Prado WWTP and Force Main from 3.5 MGD to 4.25 MGD. Design of force main throughout the facility ranged in size from 16-inch diameter PVC to 36-inch diameter PVC. Provided design-build criteria services for approximately 4 miles of force main ranging in size from 16-inch diameter PVC to 24-inch diameter PVC. Project Engineer. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Plantation Bay Utility Engineering Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Bunnell, FL) 2013 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Conducted thorough evaluation of equipment and operating capabilities of water supply, water treatment,wastewater treatment, and reuse infrastructure. Prepared a report stating the evaluation findings, immediate recommendations to resolve the FDEP consent order, and recommended CIPs with costs to make the Utility compliant and operable due to lack of proper maintenance. This information was also presented in a joint council session with the City of Bunnell and Flagler County Project Manager I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLEI ED Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection System PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2012 2013 (lslamorada, FL) d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm • Wade Trim was responsible for design and construction oversight of sanitary sewer collection and pumping systems for Islamorada. The high-profile project converted an established, residential area from septic to central sewer and used vacuum and low-pressure systems, installing a centralized collection system in this community of 1,100 resi- dents and commercial properties. The project included a two-story vacuum pump station equipped with electrical, office, and storage rooms. Design Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Del Prado Master Lift Station LS-01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (North Fort Myers, FL) 2012 2013 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El' Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for design & construction services of rehab of master LS used to collect wastewater from the northern service area feeding the Del Prado WWTF. Evaluated lift station to develop improvements, prepare a preliminary cost estimate, &prepare the bid drawings and specs for the improvements. Hydraulic calculations were conducted to verify that the existing wet well volume and pumps were properly sized for the future flow. Construction drawings prepared _ by Wade Trim consisted of civil, process, and electrical plans. Project Manager. E�, �� STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 31 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ricardo Borromeo, PE Design Engineer a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 15 <1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) MS, Environmental Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of PE: Florida, No. 67101 Technology; BS, Chemical Engineering, University of Notre Dame 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Water Environment Federation, Member; Florida Water Environment Association, Secretary—West Coast Chapter 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Cross Bar Ranch Wellfield Pump Replacement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If-applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2013 Ongoing a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm This project involves the replacement of 17 production well pumps (total capacity 55 MGD) serving the Cross Bar Ranch Wellfield. This purpose of the project is to install more efficient pumping equipment and reduce Tampa Bay Water's energy consumption and carbon footprint. Engineer of Record. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Crystal River Reclaimed Water Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Crystal River, FL) 2013 Ongoing b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm This project involves the design of a reclaimed water transmission system (8 miles of 16-inch piping)from the City's wastewater spray field to the Progress Energy Crystal River Energy Complex. Ricardo provided design for the ground storage tank and pump station. Lead Technical Professional. 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Water Main Replacement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Venice, FL) 2014 2015(est.) C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E) Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim developed a phased water main replacement program for the City of Venice to address aging infrastructure concerns and to relocate water mains from rear-lot easements to the right-of-way for ease of access.The phasing was developed to divide the area into eight projects that are similar in cost,and to first address areas that are experiencing water main breaks or water quality/pressure issues.After completing the phasing program, Wade Trim was selected for design and construction oversight of the second phase. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR C.OMPLE 1ED Northwest Hillsborough Pipeline Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2009 2011 (Tampa, FL) d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm This project is to install the required infrastructure to supply the Hillsborough County Northwest Water Treatment Plant with regional water from Tampa Bay Water's Regional Transmission System. This project also includes emergency connections at the Northwest WTP and the City of St. Petersburg Cosme WTP to supply finished water to Tampa Bay Water under emergency conditions. Quality Control Reviewer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Peace River Phase 3A Pipe Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Sarasota County, FL) 2009 2012 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm This project is the design portion for Phase 3A of the Regional Integrated Loop System.The project encompasses full design of 10 miles of 48-inch pipe, including permitting, surveying, property acquisition, and storage and high-service pump station design at the Carlton Water Treatment Plant(WTP). Quality Control Reviewer. ` 1DETKI,�I STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 32 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) I 2.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Chris Little, PE Design Engineer a.TOTAL CURRENT FIRM 12 fb.WITH 8 S.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Palm Bay, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, Civil Engineering, McNeese State University PE: Florida, No. 67158 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Florida Engineering Society; National Society of Professional Engineers 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Del Prado Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion &Force Main PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Extension (North Fort Myers, FL) 2012 2013 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE D Check if roject performed with current firm Responsible for expanding and upgrading the Del Prado WWTP from 3.5 MGD to 4.25 MGD.Tank expansions included digesters, oxidation ditches, on-site lift stations, and multiple pump stations conveying flow throughout all parts of the plant. Design of force main throughout the facility ranged in size from 16-inch diameter PVC to 36-inch diameter PVC. Provided design-build criteria services for approximately 4 miles of force main ranging in size from 16-inch diameter PVC to 24-inch diameter PVC. Engineer/CEI. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Barefoot Bay Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Operating Permit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Renewal (Brevard County, FL) 2013 N/A b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm . Assisted in the renewal of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Domestic Wastewater Facility - • Permit.•Reviewed Monthly Operation Reports (MOR), water quality reports, and historical permitting documentation. • Performed on-site inspection of the facilities to identify deficiencies and non-compliance. Prepared the FDEP permit forms, Capacity Analysis Report, O&M Report, and reviewed/updated the Reuse Operating Protocol. Responded to all FDEP questions and comments as needed. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Osmosis Drive, De Groodt Road, San Filippo Drive Transmission Water PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Main Design &Permitting (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 2011 C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Prepared plans & submitted permits for transmission WM. Coordinated with surveying. Designed the water main transmission lines.Assisted in plan preparation.Prepared the permit application and supporting documentation required for the FDEP water main construction, FDEP Environmental Resource Permit(ERP), and Melbourne-Tillman Water Control District permits. Prepared construction cost estimates. Project Engineer. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NE Lift Stations& Force Main Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2011 2013 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim to assisted in the rehab and replacement of 8 sanitary lift stations located within the NE section of the City. Work included replacement of 2 lift stations, rehab of 2 lift stations, elimination of 1 lift station, and pump replacement at 3 lift stations. Included design of 2 sanitary force mains to support the lift station reconfigurations. Coordinated with public and private utility departments to determine location of all potential utility conflicts. Prepared FDEP permit applications, basis of design document, and supporting documentation re uired for FDEP permits. Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Minton Road Water Main Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (West Melbourne, FL) 2011 2012 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE CA' Check if project performed with current firm Provided engineering services including survey, design, permitting, and preparation of bid documents for 21,425 ft of 8-inch to 18-inch—diameter waterline.Additional design included extending the 18-inch south, connecting a dead- end main, adding a 20-inch directional bore, and extending a 16-inch water main from the new 18-inch main. During the construction phase, Chris provided field representation in assessing the progress and quality of work performed, coordinated resolutions to issues in the field and assisted in the final walk though process. Resident Inspector. ADETR1 I STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 33 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Alan Schwab, PE Electrical a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 21 13 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BS, Electrical Engineering, Lawrence Technological PE: Florida; No. 61313 University;AS, Chemical Technology, Lawrence Technological University 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awords,etc.) Instrument Society of America; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Hillsborough County SCADA Standards PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2014 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm The Hillsborough County Public Utilities Department retained Wade Trim under a continuing service contract for electrical and instrumentation services to develop SCADA standards for the County.Led a team of civil process,mechanical,and electrical engineers in development of the standards to ensure they were considered from all disciplines. Standards were developed for SCADA integration, control philosophy, HMI screens, P&IDs, and PLCs. Electrical Engineer. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CESR COMPLETED ONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Palm Bay Lift Station Condition Assessment (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E( Check if projett erformed with current firm Comprised of a listing of each facility,make,model,horsepower,and type of pumping equipment.Report contained overall condition of power supply,meters,pit areas,control cabinets,wet wells,and mechanical and electrical equipment.Each motor and leads were Meggered and phase-to-phase and ground voltage recorded.Pumps were pulled,if possible,and the condition of each pump was evaluated and notated. Start/stop levels were checked and recorded.Also completed thermographic testing to identify electrical system"hot spots"for repair to prevent equipment failure. Electrical Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Waterway Estates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Fort.Myers, FL) 2012 2013 C. 3.BRIEF DES P IO (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E] Check if project performed with current firm Assisted FGUA in expanding its)wastewater collection infrastructure by 1 million GPD to collect flows from the Waterway Estates service area. Expansion included installation of approx. 8 miles of FM and construction of an intermediate pump station to send flows from the Waterway Estates WWTP, soon to be decommissioned, to the newly expanded Del Prado WVVTP located in North Fort Myers. Responsible for preparation of the Design Criteria Package(DCP)and construction engineering services, start-up, and project close-out. Electrical Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR C.OMPLEI ED Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection System PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2012 2013 (lslamorada, FL) d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E1 Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim was responsible for design and construction oversight of sanitary sewer collection and pumping systems for Islamorada. The high-profile project converted an established, residential area from septic to central sewer and used vacuum and low-pressure systems, installing a centralized collection system in this community of 1,100 resi- dents and commercial properties. The project included a two-story vacuum pump station equipped with electrical, office, and storage rooms. Electrical Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2014 2016 (est.) e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE i Check if project performed with current firm The SR 585 project limits extend from SR 60 to Hillsborough Avenue and is defined by three very distinct typical sections. As a streetscaping and reconstruction project in an urban corridor,each intersection had to be uniquely designed.This project involved drainage storm sewer inventory, traffic operations/signalization, pedestrian/ADA upgrades, signing- marking, streetscaping/landscaping, lighting, and roadway design. Electrical Engineer. 1114 WADETRBI STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 34 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE John Kelley, PE Roadway Engineer/MOT a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 7 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, Michigan Technological University PE: Florida, No. 73984 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,TrainingAwards,etc.) Organizations: Florida Engineering Society,American Society of Highway Engineers,American Society of Civil Engineers, Current YMG Board Member Training: FDOT Specifications, 2012;AutoCAD Civil3D;AutoTurn; GuidSign; FDOT GEOPAK for Roadway Designers; Prelimina Project Re.ort PPR Trainin.• Lon. Ranee Estimates LRE 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED East Tampa 22nd Street Corridor Enhancements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2013 2013 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION Brief scope,size,cost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE CI Check if project performed with current firm Project It consists of consists 1 mile of mile and widening in some areas,landscaped medians,a 10-foot multi- use sidewalk, bus bays, landscaping,and a roundabout at the intersection of 21 st/22nd Streets and 23rd Ave. Project tasks included roadway geometrics, utility coordination, drainage design and permitting, pavement design, grading plans, driveway connection permits, signing and marking, maintenance of traffic plans, and engineers' estimates.A portion of this proiect was done under a Local Agency Program (LAP)agreement. Engineer of Record. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2014 2016(est.) b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E( Check if project performed with current firm . Reduced one-way pair of streets from three lanes to two and added on-street parking and bicycle lanes. Improvements • included widened sidewalks & bulb-outs, drainage improvements, upgrading pedestrian features & bus stops to ADA standards,signal upgrades,signing&pavement markings,water main replacement,landscaping,&streetscaping features. Extensive coordination was necessary between FDOT,the City of Tampa,Ybor City,Barrio Latino Historic District,business owners and the general pt thlic.to PnsurP that everyone's requests were addr.sspd ProjPCt Fnninppr I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YBAR COMPLETED Druid Trail &Beach Connector Trail Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Clearwater, FL) 2014 2014 C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm The Beach Connector Trail provides connectivity between the Clearwater beach boardwalk to the Memorial Causeway Bridge. The Druid Trail provides additional connectivity from Memorial Causeway Bridge to both the Pinellas Trail and the Progress Energy Trail. Tasks performed include utility coordination, trail design/layout, ADA ramp design, construction quantities, and as-needed construction services. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR LOMPLE I ED Morningside Traffic Calming PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Clearwater, FL) 2011 2011 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Performed a thorough analysis of current conditions in the subdivision and determined several types of traffic calming techniques to help calm traffic and beautify the neighborhood. Provided design of traffic calming features, extensive turning movement analysis using AutoTURN,utility coordination,storm sewer design,roundabout design and grading plans,plan preparation,and engineer's estimates.Traffic calming features included roundabouts and mini-roundabouts (at T-intersections). landscaped medians and bulb-outs._oval medians. and speed tables. Project Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Cr 578 Multi-Lane Reconstruction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Pasco/Hernando Counties, FL) 2010 2010 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E( Check if project performed with current firm Design took the project from a two-lane rural roadway to a four-lane divided suburban typical section.The typical section included a raised median, paved shoulders, sidewalk, and shared-use path. The four-lane design was the interim design and was developed for a future widening to a six-lane urban typical section. Project included an underground stormwater system and off-site stormwater management ponds. Right-of-way acquisition for mainline improvements and stnrmwater management facilities were also real tired Signing &Pavement Marking W1DETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 35 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Steve Wallace, PE Roadway Engineer a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 18 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) I 6.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, Colorado State University PE: Florida, No. 59537 NCEES, No. 43209 I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations: Hillsborough County PRIDE Committee; Florida Engineering Society; Society of American Military Engineers;American Society of Civil Engineers, FUCC, FTBA Training: FDOT Specifications Certification; Florida DOT Advanced Maintenance of Traffic Certification; MicroStation; GEOPAK; InRoads; FDOT A.•lications ;ASAD; GuidSi•n;AutoTurn 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SR 585 Urban Corridor Modifications PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2014 2016 (est.) a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ID Check if project performed with current firm The SR 585 project limits extend from SR 60 to Hillsborough Avenue and is defined by three very distinct typical sections. As a streetscaping and reconstruction project in an urban corridor,each intersection had to be uniquely designed.This project involved drainage storm sewer inventory, traffic operations/signalization, pedestrian/ADA upgrades, signing- marking, streetscaping/landscaping, lighting, and roadway design. Project Manager/Engineer of Record. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole Tribe of Florida TIP Projects PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Miscellaneous South Florida Indian Reservations, FL) 2013 Ongoing b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim actively works with the STOF on transportation projects and road improvements for corridors throughout • Florida on Indian reservations.The projects include:Buffalo Jim Loop Road,Mabel T Frank Way,and Falcon Lane Road /Osprey Road/South Boundary Road.Although each project has unique issues of its own, consistent services for all STOF projects include coordination with local residents, maintenance of traffic, signing/marking, agency compliancy, utility coordination, and services during construction. Project Manager. _ I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US 27, Barry Road to US 192, Reconstruction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Polk County, FL) 2011 Ongoing C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION Brief scope,size,co eic.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project included a design of four to six-lane widening and resurfacing on 4.2 miles of major rural arterial roadway in the Disney World area. Project included design of roadway widening, resurfacing and cross slope analysis, pavement design and drainage improvements,safety improvements,lowering US 192 under the existing bridge to allow widening and create required bridge to roadway clearance,traffic control plans, pavement marking and signing,traffic analysis and design of three new traffic signals. Project Manager&EOR. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)Y EAR COMPLE I ED Himes Avenue Intersection Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2009 TBD d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for plans production,schedule,budget,coordination,&technical accuracy of the design.Began as a PD&E to determine alignments &cost/benefit alternatives to best fit minor widening into the existing right-of-way.After the preferred alignment was selected, the project then moved into design. The scope included adding two left turn lanes at the signalized intersection, upgrading all pedestrian &ADA facilities, provide sidewalk on the west side, widen the road in each direction. resurface the mainline of the cross street. and upgr de the signals. Project Manager/EOR. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 4th Street North and 112th Avenue Intersection Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (St. Petersburg, FL) 2009 TBD e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brie f sco a si a ost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for the PD&E and design of the project. His duties included cost-benefit analysis, budgeting, schedule, coordination for both agencies,and plans production.The 4th St/112th Avenue intersection improvement project was a LAP project between FDOT D7 and the City of St. Petersburg. The scope of the project included rebuilding traffic separators along 4th St, realigning signal heads, upgrading and replacing drainage structures, widen to add a left turn lane, new striping, and pavement design. Project Manager& EOR. WADETRIi I STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 36 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E.for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Aimee Giacherio, PE Traffic Engineer a.T1T3AL 1b.WITH CUR ENT FIRM 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, Michigan Technological University PE, Florida: No. 72869 I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,TrainingAwards,etc.) Institute of Transportation Engineers, International,American Society of Civil Engineers, Transportation Research Board, Traffic Academy-2007, Bicycle Facilities and Speed,Advanced Synchro and SimTraffic Training - University of Nebraska, Highway Capacity Software 2000-Florida State University, Consulting Engineers Management-Lawrence Technolo•ical University 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED National Heritage Academies PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Miscellaneous Cities, CO, IN, Ml, LA, GA, WI, NY, NC, OH) 2014 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cos etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I7 Check if project performed with current firm Responsible for conducting traffic impact studies&developing on-site circulation patterns&procedures for new schools& additions to existing charter schools. Each fall a traffic flow and circulation guideline handbook is made for each new school & discussed with the principal. These handbooks include pavement marking plans for new schools, stacking diagrams, traffic circulation diagrams,guidelines&recommendations for each school according to the MUTCD.Assistance is provided at schools throughout the school year for continual process improvement with the dismissal procedures.Traffic Engineer. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Traffic Study&Development Plan Reviews PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) I. (Venice, FL) 2013 N/A b. �.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size, s etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Ef, Check project performed with current firrrf onaucting ongoing reviews or'development plans or development in the City and peer reviews or traffic impact studies conaucte• by other consultants for developers planning commercial and residential development.Assisting the City in developing necessa study area for traffic study and methodology to be used to complete the analyses.Preparing reports providing recommendation For improving plans to meet MUTCD, City, County, & FDOT specifications & guidelines and providing recommendations fo modifying or accepting the results of impact studies based on local concurrency guidelines.Traffic Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Battle Creek Downtown Traffic Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Battle Creek, MI) 2010 N/A C. BRIEF DESCRIPTION Brie cope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ® Check if project performed with current firm Comprehensive(traffic study of downtown CBD area. Collected traffic volumes, geometric, and traffic control data fo the downtown area and develop Synchro models for peak and off-peak conditions; calibrated and validated models for existing conditions; and estimated impacts of closing a downtown street either on a temporary or permanent basis. Pedestrian movements and safety were given priority as one objective of the study was to see what elements could be changed to permit adequate traffic flow and make the downtown area more edestrian friendly.Traffic Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLE ED Grand Haven Area Public Schools Safety&Operational Review PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Davison Township, MI) 2011 N/A d' 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Ef Check if project performed with current firm Performed safety improvement studies for three elementary schools and one middle school. These projects involve• separate public design input meetings with bus drivers,school staff members,and the adjacent neighborhoods to gathe input and define hurdles to reduce conflicts between pedestrians,buses and vehicles.Analysis included geometric,traffi• volume and traffic control, parking studies,on-site circulation,stacking requirements,traffic signal warrant analysis, anal sight distance studies. Project Manager. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US 41 Venice Bypass Roadway&Bridge Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Venice, FL) 2012 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Modeled and simulated a 2.5-mile stretch of the US 41 Bypass in conjunction with the design and construction plans fo roadway and bridge improvements along this corridor.The base Synchro model includes four lanes of boulevard and non boulevard sections linked together with a total of 23 intersections.The purpose of the re-evaluation was to develop anal refine alternatives that include a six-lane typical section development to minimize right-of-way impacts.Traffic Engineer. WADETKLM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 37 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jeff Gilbert, PE Construction Inspection a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 21 8 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Islamorada, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BSCE, University of Southern Illinois PE, Florida: No. 56646 I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Key Largo Wastewater Treatment District Vacuum Sewer Basin C PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Key Largo, FL) 2008 2010 a. BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project was a vacuum sewer system consisting of 65,000 lineal feet of sewers and approximately 400 vacuum service pits to serve 1,100 existing and potentially 1,400 future customers. Project includes 3 bore and jack crossings of US 1 and short segments of gravity sewers to serve selected areas.Areas served by gravity sewers are connected to the vacuum sewer system by buffer tanks. 68,000 linear feet of vacuum sewer through the streets of Key Largo in 4 phases with 2.6 million dollar cost estimate. Lead Design Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Bay Point Wastewater Treatment Plant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Key Largo, FL) 2008 2009 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm After construction, FKAA was required by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to provide improvements and upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant. This project included modifications to the aeration delivery systems, alkalinity feed system, headworks, isolation of RAS and digester functions a flow splitter box to improve the equalization flow from the equalization basin to the anoxic basins. Site Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Wastewater Program Implementation 2013 (Islamorada, FL) N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Prepared design standards and criteria to be used in project delivery.Crafted a design Standards Manual and DCP that details the system alternatives for the Village including vacuum collection system, low-pressure force main systems, and septic tank effluent pumping systems(STEP). Provided direction and leadership detailing the requirements and standards for the Village's collection technologies in these areas. The program is in its early stages and full design efforts are expected to begin shortly now that the design standards and criteri have been es b pId Des Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) Ocean Reef Club Low-Pressure Sewer Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (North Key Largo, FL) 2009 2010 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Provided design for a low-pressure grinder sewer pump system for the Ocean Reef Club located in North Key Largo. This project consisted of two low-pressure grinder pump sewage collection and conveyance systems to place several nearby businesses on the public sewer system and eliminate their septic tanks.One of the low-pressure grinder pump systems serves a golf course and a commercial area that included a gas station and several small retail stores. The second grinder station was designed to provide sewer service to an airport erminal building. Lead Design Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2014 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Assisting in soliciting procurement of DBOF vendors to design, build, operate, &finance work.Addressing necessary activities for development of a DCP for use as a component of a DBOF procurement strategy. Includes development of technical portions of noted DCP document, meetings with Village and its legal counsel(s), bidding assistance with RFQ/RFP review, technical review of DBOF proposals, &support services during the negotiation phase of selected DBOF team Value engineering is a key component of project delivery to keep project costs down Project Fngineer WADETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 38 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Gene Hoffman Construction Manager a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 29 18 I S.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Islamorada, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BS History, Mathematics, Northern Michigan University; MS Construction Management coursework, Eastern Michigan University, in progress I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Certification: Michigan Concrete Association Concrete Technician Level I;Troxler Laboratories Nuclear Density— Moisture Gauge Operator; U.S. Department of Labor Initial Tunnel Rescue; MDOT Documentation Technician; OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Course I 9,RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(Cty and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Allen Park Tunnel Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Allen Park, MI) 2008 2012 a. BRIEF DESC IPTI (B sco i e�co etc.)AND SP CIFIC LE t� Check if project performed with current firm Inspected 4,100 LF o` 9b diameter rib and lag tunnel. Project is a long-term corrective action designed to bring a sanitary system into regulatory compliance. The tunnel conveys flow to a new 8.4 cfs submersible dry weather/wet weather lift station,onto a new 14"diameter force main that outlets to an existing trunk sewer outlet.The trunk sewer upgrade consisted of converting 1,300 LF of existing gravity sewer into 14"diameter force main. High-pressure gas and oil line utility conflicts required slipline construction for a 900'section of the force main. Construction Inspector. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Canton Township Relief Sewer Construction PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Canton Township, MI) 2008 2010 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Project included 4,400', 42"sewer through 267 acres of undeveloped land that serves as a park area and floodplain along the Rouge River. The segment parallels an existing sewer's entire length providing additional capacity for upstream development in the western portion of the township.A 5,100'gravel access path was created to maintain the new sewer and provide needed access to the existing sewer,which was constructed primarily with open-cut methods and boring for wetland. drain. and road crossings. Construction Inspector. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Wastewater Program Implementation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2013 N/A (Islamorada, FL) C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Prepared design standards and criteria to be used in project delivery.Crafted a design Standards Manual and DCP that details the system alternatives for the Village including vacuum collection system, low-pressure force main systems, and septic tank effluent pumping systems (STEP). Provided direction and leadership detailing the requirements and standards for the Village's collection technologies in these areas. The program is in its early stages and full design efforts are expected to begin shortly now that the design standards and criteria have been est b as RE/4n Engineer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Dearborn CSO Project PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Dearborn, MI) 2010 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION SBriefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Inspected a 110 diameter, 130' deep sinking caisson CSO capture shaft; 1,200 LF of 11' x 12', cast-in-place concrete box sewer; and a 3,000 SF treatment control building. Responsibilities included inspection of a cast-in-place concrete sinking shaft caisson,TERS,cast-in-place box sewer,river floodplain restoration,and facility control building including pile foundation,concrete,waterproofing,masonry,framing,electrical,mechanical,and process piping.Additional responsibilities included verifying and tracking of stored materials and change order/claims c st reviews. Construction Inspector. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2014 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Assisting in soliciting procurement of DBOF vendors to design, build, operate, &finance work.Addressing necessary activities for development of a DCP for use as a component of a DBOF procurement strategy. Includes development of technical portions of noted DCP document, meetings with Village and its legal counsel(s), bidding assistance with RFQ/RFP review, technical review of DBOF proposals, &support services during the negotiation phase of selected DBOF team. Value engineering is a key component of project delivery to keep project costs down Project Fngineer w1DETKlM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 39 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Rhonda Busch Document Controls a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM _ 26 19 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Islamorada, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Personnel Recordkeeping & Reporting Program; Business Management Curriculum; Certificate, dBase IV Training Course; Ongoing Information &Records Management 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Certification: Michigan Concrete Association Concrete Technician Level I;Troxler Laboratories Nuclear Density— Moisture Gauge Operator; U.S. Department of Labor Initial Tunnel Rescue; MDOT Documentation Technician; OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Course 9.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PC-744 Program Management Services for Wastewater Treatment Plant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Rehabilitation &Upgrade (Detroit, MI) 2009 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E7 Check if project performed with current firm Joint-venture, $550 million rehabilitation of the City's wastewater treatment plant to achieve long-term, sustained compliance. More than 50 capital improvement projects were completed using traditional and alternative delivery methods. Document Controls Specialist. I TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED CM-1250 Three Detroit CSO Basins Construction Management PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Canton Township, MI) 2008 2010 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Er Check if project performed with current firm Project included 4,400', 42"sewer through 267 acres of undeveloped land that serves as a park area and floodplain along the Rouge River. The segment parallels an existing sewer's entire length providing additional capacity for upstream development in the western portion of the township.A 5,100'gravel access path was created to maintain the new sewer and provide needed access to the existing sewer,which was constructed primarily with open-cut methods and boring for wetland. drain. and road crossings. Construction Inspector. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Wastewater Program Implementation 2013 (Islamorada, FL) N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Prepared design standards and criteria to be used in project delivery.Crafted a design Standards Manual and DCP that details the system alternatives for the Village including vacuum collection system, low-pressure force main systems, and septic tank effluent pumping systems (STEP). Provided direction and leadership detailing the requirements and standards for the Village's collection technologies in these areas. The program is in its early stages and full design efforts are expected to begin shortly now that the design standards and criteri have been esAiKE,Meskgn Engineer. 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Renewable Energy Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Cleveland, OH) 2008 2013 d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm This $92 million initiative includes a complex facility that will replace the Southerly Treatment Plant's existing biosolids dewatering, handling, incineration, and malodorous gas treatment systems. Managed document management system tracking correspondence, RFIs change orders, shop drawings, and other records pertinent to project construction management. Document Control Administrator. I TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Islamorada Design Criteria Professional Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2014 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Assisting in soliciting procurement of DBOF vendors to design, build, operate, &finance work.Addressing necessary activities for development of a DCP for use as a component of a DBOF procurement strategy. Includes development of technical portions of noted DCP document, meetings with Village and its legal counsel(s), bidding assistance with RFQ/RFP review, technical review of DBOF proposals, &support services during the negotiation phase of selected DBOF team. Value engineering is a key component of project delivery to keep project costs down. Project Fngineer ADEZ•1Z1M STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 40 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Kameren Richard CADD Designer a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 18 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Special Training: FDOT Plans Preparation Training, 2010; FDOT 2010 Design Update; FDOT Plans, Specifications& Estimates, WPUC Training, 2009; Urban Street Geometric Design 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SR 60 from Turkey Creek Road to Clarence Gordon Jr. Road PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Tampa, FL) 2011 2013 a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I3 Check if project performed with current firm Included milling and resurfacing of a four-lane divided highway with the addition of sidewalk on both sides of SR 60 from Turkey Creek Rd. to Clarence Gordon Jr. Rd. Involved in all major facets of plans production, including plan sheets, cross sections,drainage structures,typical sections,back of sidewalk profiles and signing and marking plans.Performed a detailed field sign inventory of the entire project for ease of the signing and marking plans. Senior CADD Technician. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Rymfire Multi-Use Path PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Coast, FL) 2012 2013 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Provided a Design-Build Bid Package for an ADA-compliant concrete multi-use path system complying with State, Local,and Federal Standards as appropriate.The FDOT Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook and The Florida Green Book was used as a minimum baseline for the standards. Senior CADD Technician/Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) US 41 (Venice Bypass)Design 2014 (Venice, FL) 2015(est.) C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Includes milling, resurfacing and widening approximately 2.5 miles of urban roadway from Center Road to Bird Bay Drive. Senior CADD Technician involved in all major facets of plans production, including plan sheets,cross sections, drainage structures, typical sections, and back of sidewalk profiles. Performed a detailed field sign inventory of the entire project for ease of the signing and marking plans. Senior CADD Technician. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLE1 ED US 27 Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Polk County, FL) 2009 Ongoing d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Includes milling, resurfacing and widening of approximately 4.10 miles of rural roadway from Barry Road to US 192. Senior CADD technician involved in all major facets of plans production, including but not limited to plan sheets, cross sections, drainage structures, typical sections, back of sidewalk profiles, sound barrier wall aesthetic plans, and signing and marking plans. Performed a detailed field sign inventory of the entire project for ease of the signing and marking plans. Senior CADD Technician. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED CR 578(County Line Road)Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Islamorada, FL) 2010 2010 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Included reconstruction and portions of milling and resurfacing of approximately 2.9 miles of roadway. Senior CADD Technician involved in all major facets of plans production including but not limited to plan sheets,summary of quantities, drainage structures, typical sections and signing and marking plans. Responsible for data entry into Transport, for use in the summary of pay items.Also involved in the PEDDS electronic delivery process. Senior CADD Technician. 114 `�ADETRiM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 41 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Dave McKone CADD Designer a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 30 14 I S.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,TrainingAwards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FGUA-Pasco County Utility Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2011 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Led a team of engineers and designers for utility design projects. The first utility project included design of five interconnections between the FGUA and Pasco County water systems. The second project included design of a water treatment plant upgrade. The treatment plant was upgraded from a direct chlorination, ground storage, and repumping facility to include forced draft aeration with odor control,associated pH adjustment, pressure filtration,and . chloramination. CADD Designer. I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Raw Water Transmission Mains PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (New Port Richey, FL) 2010 2011 b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Project involved location and design of 7 miles of raw water transmission main to pump raw water from the existing wells to.the upgraded water treatment plant. The project included work in the FDOT right-of-way and several areas of horizontal directional drilling. CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Water Main Replacement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Venice, FL) 2014 2015(est.) C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Wade Trim developed�a phased water main replacement program for the City of Venice to address aging infrastructure concerns and to relocate water mains from rear-lot easements to the right-of-way for ease of access.The phasing was developed to divide the area into eight projects that are similar in cost,and to first address areas that are experiencing water main breaks or water quality/pressure issues.After completing the phasing program, Wade Trim was selected for design and construction oversight of the second phase. CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLE I ED PC-744 Program Management Services for Wastewater Treatment Plant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Rehabilitation &Upgrade (Detroit, Ml) 2009 N/A d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Joint-venture, $550 million rehabilitation of the City's wastewater treatment plant to achieve long-term, sustained compliance. More than 50 capital improvement projects were completed using traditional and alternative delivery methods. CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Cross Bayou Water Reclamation Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Pinellas County, FL) 2012 2014 e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E1 Check if project performed with current firm The WRF currently has two separate treatment trains: north and south. Pinellas County Utilities recently completed the upgrade of the South Train blowers from centrifugal to high-speed turbo-type systems and desires to upgrade the North Train. Project includes the replacement of the existing blowers with turbo blowers to provide more efficient air transfer at a lower annual cost. The North Train currently has four 800 hp centrifugal blowers, two of which have diesel mntors that can he manually cnuplecl to prnvirie backup air supply in case of a power outage C.Aflfl fAsignAr ER E�. `� STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 42• E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL FORTHIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 4.YEARS EXPERIENCE Mike Horne CADD Designer a.TOTAL I b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 19 1 I S.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Wade Trim (Tampa, FL) I 6.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) AS, Engineering I 8.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) I 9.RELEVANT PROJECTS I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Biosolids Treatment&Disposal Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2011 N/A a. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if iproject performed with current firm Knowing the revisions to Chapter 62-640 FAC biosolids regulations were going to increase the cost of biosolids disposal in the State of Florida, the City of Palm Bay requested the assistance of Wade Trim to complete a study to identify"right size"treatment options to produce Class A/AA biosolids. Six treatment processes were selected for detailed investigation to develop a planning level projection of the treatment and disposal costs associated with each process.CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Port St. John Wastewater Treatment Plant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Port St. John, FL) 2014 2015(est.) b. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope size,co a c.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm WW treatment occurs within an 66 diameter ring steel tank split into aeration&digestion zones around a secondary clarifier.The tank needed significant rehab after 20 years of service. WT helped design improvements to an existing secondary digester tank to convert it into an aeration basin,forming a new standby.secondary biological treatment train. This was the most cost-effective solution to provide continued treatment of the influent WW to the facility while an existing ring steel treatment tank is being taken out of service for several months for extensive rehab,including removal of tank coating that contains heavy metals.CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Energy Efficiency Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A C. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc. AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Performed technical analysis of different treatment methods and processes, including fine bubble aeration, aerobic digestion options (course bubble aeration) and variable blower air flow rate (aerobic) options.Analysis of each item quantified the energy cost of its current operation,provided a desktop analysis of process modifications,and quantified the life cycle costs/payback period of any recommended process modifications. The City has seen a 31% reduction in its energy consumption at the wastewater treatment facilities thus far. CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLEX ED Troutman Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2012 Ongoing d. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Assessed operations and condition of the City's 4 MGD WWTP. Effort performed to identify and program projects catered to replacing outdated equipment and make operational efficiency improvements to the plant. Several projects were identified and implemented,including replacement of the WWTP generator,grit classifier and screening conveyor, surface aerators at the aerobic digester, of aerators at the secondary treatment, and overall improvements to the WWTP's electrical and instrumentation system. CADD Designer. I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Treatment Plant Condition Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (Palm Bay, FL) 2011 N/A e. 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm To prepare project budgets for future facility improvements,Wade Trim performed an independent condition assessment of the City's three treatment facilities for the purpose of identifying and prioritizing the condition of the facilities. The early work is being expanded upon by the City to prepare a five-year needs assessment to justify funding future facility improvements projects. CADD Designer. fit W ADET R1M STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 43 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or I 0 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 2I.TITLE AND LOCATION(Gtr and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Venice Water Main Replacement Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable (Venice, FL) 2014 2015(est.) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION T: a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c. •I - • • A H•" N Tim Hochuli, PE,Assistant Utilities 941.486.2788 x227 City of Venice thochuli @venicegov.com Director 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT The City of Venice has several areas where water main was originally constructed in rear lot easements of properties.Access to the rear lot easements has decreased over time due to fences and vegetation, which is becoming a concern for repair and replacement as the infrastructure ages. The City is undertaking a water main P 9 Y � 9 replacement program to construct water main in the road right-of-way where needed, , relocate water services to the right-of-way water main, then abandon the rear lot - • . ` � water main. — =f;� ' Wade Trim was retained by the City to develop a phasing program report to define 4 ;-: = � *°II geographical boundaries and sequencing for the project phases. The phasing program used GIS information obtained from the City and field-verified by Wade =,-vN-) " Trim to create a map of the water meters that need to be relocated. Where there ,_ iF was not water main in the right-of-way for these properties to connect to the new - ;' `' service, proposed water main was added to the map. GIS was used to create � ,I , Y*�A 4 phasing boundaries with an appropriate quantity of proposed water main and new water services that fell within the City's annual budget for the program. ; r , After successfully establishing the phasing,Wade Trim was asked to provide design ; •and construction administration services for Phase 2 of the water main replacement program. Phase 2 included relocation of 123 water services, including coordination ''° "" " with property owners, installation of 1 mile of new water main, and abandonment of more than 3 miles of aged rear-lot water main. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Tampa, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE 11.1 WADETRI�i STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 44 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present os many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Middle Plantation Key Collection System PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable (Islamorada, FL) 2010 2012 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c.POINT OF •N A- PH• NUM: Greg Tindle, Wastewater Program 305.664.6451 Islamorada, Village of Islands greg.tindle @islamorada.fl.us Manager 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCETO THIS CONTRACT Numerous scientific studies have documented the contribution of failing septic tanks and cesspools to the deterioration of water quality in the Florida Keys. • Currently,the majority of residents and commercial establishments in the Keys are not connected to advanced wastewater treatment systems, but septic tanks and outdated on-site package plants. These systems, if not properly operated, allow bacteria and nutrients to leech into near-shore waters. To remedy this situation,the Village of Islamorada requested Wade Trim to design and construct a vacuum collection system to transport the raw sewage from the residential and commercial properties of Middle Plantation Key to the Key Largo WWTP.This project consisted of developing a hydraulic model to simulate sewage flows and identify the optimal location of collection pits,grinder pump stations,and pipelines to service approximately 1,060 customers. Based on results from the hydraulic model, a vacuum pump station was sized as the collection point for the vacuum system prior to re-pumping to Key Largo.As of March 2013, the majority of the collection system piping has been installed per the results of the hydraulic model and construction of the vacuum pump station is in its initial stages. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Islamorada, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE WADETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 45 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S KEY 20.EXAMPLENUMBER PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects.if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project) 2I.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Palm Bay Lift Station Condition Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable (Palm Bay, FL) 2010 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 321.953.3410 City of Palm Bay Katie Ennis, PE,Assistant Director katie.ennis @pblf.org 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT The City of Palm Bay is approximately 105 square miles, located on the eastern coast of Florida in Brevard County. The City consists of a force main collection -< system including 102 lift stations. The City, in an effort to develop a preventative f �� maintenance program and budget for its Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, 60 `=r '• performed a condition assessment of its lift stations to quantify the effort and budget 40 ( i• needed to perform necessary capital improvements. • 30 F '.110 • • 20 ' 20 Wade Trim performed a detailed condition assessment for these lift stations. r to = i30 The condition assessment comprised of a listing of each facility, make, model, 31SC14ARCE GAUGE *O. 1 horsepower,and type of pumping equipment.The report contains overall condition of power supply, meters, pit areas, control cabinets, wet wells, and mechanical equipment and electrical equipment. Each motor and leads were Meggered and .� ir 4-phase-to-phase and ground voltage recorded. Pumps were pulled,if possible,and the condition of each pump was evaluated and notated. Start/stop levels were checked and recorded. Wade Trim also completed thermographic testing to identify electrical system "hot spots" for repair to prevent equipment failure. The project was completed with a report prepared by Wade Trim that prioritized system repairs and improvements needed to meet existing and future capacity demands. Project schedules and budgets were developed for the recommendations to assist the City of Palm Bay in its capital improvement planning efforts. Wade Trim assisted in developing a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)for the City to continue preventative and predictive maintenance practices. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION ' (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(Oty and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Palm Bay, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. wADETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 46 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or I 0 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Waterway Estates Design-Build Pipeiline PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable (Fort Myers, FL) 2013 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Florida Governmental Utility Rob Dickson, PE, Capital Program 407.629.6900 Authority Manager rdickson @govmserv.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT To eliminate treated wastewater effluent from being discharged to the , Caloosahatchee River, flows from the existing Waterway Estates Wastewater 1 „. Treatment Facility required diversion to a neighboring wastewater facility. At the time flows were pumped generally south in Fort Myers, where the Waterway Estates WWTP was located.The closest available facility to receive diverted flow f _. from Waterway Estates was the Del Prado WWTP, but it was located well north �—= of the Waterway Estates WWTP. 1 r• j hi, . . FGUA turned to Wade Trim to develop a Design Criteria Package (DCP) to interconnect flows from the Waterway Estates area to the Del Prado WWTP. The purpose of the DCP was to provide a Design-Builder with the ground-level information and criteria for the design and construction of the 5.5 miles of 16- and 18-inch diameter interconnect pipeline between Waterway Estates and the connection point with Del Prado.This project provided new,adequate pumping and conveyance systems to direct the flow generally north to the Del Prado WWTP.The Design-Builder designed and constructed the new interconnect system without interrupting the normal operation of the existing system. New pump stations were part of the project's scope, which included expanding the SCADA system. Upon completion of the DCP, Wade Trim became the Owner's Representative, assisting with procuring the Design-Builder, overseeing the design and construction of the project, and ensuring timely completion. During the project's design phase, Wade Trim attended design review meetings on behalf of the Owner and received design submittals,which were reviewed for compliance with the DCP.As construction advanced,Wade Trim reviewed project-related shop drawings, attended progress meetings, and performed on-site inspections. Start-up and commissioning testing were witnessed by Wade Trim construction personnel, which were approved prior to the system being placed into service. Wade Trim completed all progress-related close-out documents and prepared final shop drawings for the project.Wade Trim also certified the project upon completion. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Tampa, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d, lel Wi�►DETRI�i STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 47 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 2I.TITLEAND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED SR 585(21st/22nd Streets)from Adamo Drive to Hillsborough PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable Avenue (Tampa, FL) 2014 2016 (est.) 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Florida Department of 813.975.6161 Transportation, District 7 Allan Urbonas, PE allan.urbonas @dot.state.fl.us 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT Wade Trim was selected by FDOT District 7 for the SR 585 Urban Modifications —T project.The purpose of this project was to retrofit the existing urban arterial section _ -� f ' _ � into a local road with historic features,pedestrian-friendly design,and streetscaping. _ _ The corridor is made up of two one-way pairs, three lanes each from SR 60 (W. �: tr ■"' V51Adamo Dr.) to the roundabout north of I-4 at E. 22nd Avenue. The three lanes in s •4 - - .y _ each direction were reduced to two lanes in each direction with granite curbing. �� t �r w t� r'� Each intersection was individually designed. Brick crosswalks were used to meet ;°i• ; � 1`, "— the conditions of the historic district and were built with granite curb borders. The ?-f intersections were configured to meet ADA requirements and used decorative _' 9 q � - 4. � , , ► detectable warnings and full four-direction curb drop ramps. Five-globe period et lighting, benches, and decorative trash cans were placed throughout the project _ •• and at each intersection.Drainage design,landscaping,and utility relocation made each intersection evaluation challenging during design. In all,40 intersections were modified using all of the design components listed. Traffic signals were adjusted or replaced at eight locations. Signal cycle length, LOS, and safety analysis were used to develop the final design. A new decorative mast arm was used to replace an older mast arm at 7th Avenue on both 21st and 22nd Streets.Adual left turn lane was added to the northbound signalized intersection of 22nd Street and 14th Avenue for westbound 1-4 ramp entry. Signal head adjustments were necessary for all signalized intersections to accommodate the three-lane reduction to two lanes. Each signalized intersection also installed pedestrian signal heads meeting current MUTCD and ADA standards. The intersections design had to consider the close proximity of buildings and no additional right-of-way.Damages to businesses, disruption to access, and ADA provisions for streetside doorways became critical design elements. Each intersection had to be independently analyzed for sidewalk width and slope to ensure it was correctly tied into the existing right-of-way. When designing intersection improvements with private properties and private businesses along the corridor, checking for drainage and correct slope of sidewalks must be done at every location. Creating a new drainage pattern that drains water to a building has to be avoided.Additionally, access at driveways and correctly aligning the driveways help keep the private property owners from having complaints. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Tampa, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. WADETRI`i STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 48 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSEDTEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or I 0 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Hillsborough County SCADA Standards PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable (Tampa, FL) 2014 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT C.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Hillsborough County Public 813.663.3217 Eli Alvarado, Project Controls Manager Utilities Department alvaradoe@hillsboroughcounty.org 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCETOTHIS CONTRACT The Hillsborough County Public Utilities Department retained - �-- --- Wade Trim under a continuing service contract for electrical and instrumentation services to develop SCADA standards for (� the County. To ensure the standards were considered from all disciplines, the Wade Trim project team included civil process, -- I mechanical, and electrical engineers. The standards project included written specifications for SCADA system components w and programming and development of a graphics library for the interface screens. To further standardize the controls system _Rg beyond the SCADA interface level, Wade Trim also developed ", - P&ID standards, equipment naming and tagging standards, Wits it and a P&ID primitives library in AutoCAD. The library will allow designers to select the appropriate primitive for the type of equipment in the P&ID, insert it into the drawing, and tag the signals using the standardized naming conventions. This consistency not only makes each P&ID appear the same, but also ensures that the control functionality for equipment will be the same at each facility After the SCADA and P&ID standards were developed, the County requested that Wade Trim continue the standards project down to the PLC level.A team of engineers from Wade Trim and the County worked together to develop a list of standard PLC function blocks that could be used as building blocks for system integrators to use in PLC programming.A written process description was also developed for each function block to ensure that control functionality remained consistent. Wade Trim subconsulted a system integrator to develop the actual function blocks so they will be available in a library for all system integrators to use in PLC programming. Wade Trim also developed a Change Management Protocol for managing changes to the SCADA system. This system will require permission for a technician to make changes, and will ensure proper documentation of the changes is maintained. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Wade Trim Tampa, FL Prime (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE (I)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(Gty and State) (3)ROLE d. ADETRIM STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)Page 49 G.KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS USTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT (Fill in"Example Projects key"section below before completing table.Place (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) "X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Holly Kremers, PE Project Manager V V V Tom Brzezinski, PE QA/QC ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Eddie Fontanin, PE Utility Master Planning ✓ ✓ V Amanda Warner,AICP GIS/Mapping ✓ ✓ Kurt Ahlgrim, PE Hydraulic Modeling ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Mike Reineke, El Drainage/Stormwater ✓ ✓ ✓ Dan Garcia, PE Design Engineering Lead Dan Burden, Ph.D., PE Design Engineer ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Clayton McCormack, PE Design Engineer—Process V V V/ Oscar Duarte, PE Design Engineer—Mechanical V V V ✓ Ricardo Borromeo, PE Design Engineer ✓ ✓ Chris Little, PE Design Engineer ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Alan Schwab, PE Electrical/ Instrumentation 17 '7 '7 ✓ ✓ John Kelley, PE Roadway Engineer/MOT ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Steve Wallace, PE Roadway Engineer ✓ Aimee Giacherio, PE Traffic Engineer V Jeff Gilbert, PE Construction Inspection ✓ Gene Hoffman Construction Manager ✓ Rhonda Busch Document Control V Kameren Richard CADD Designer ✓ V ✓ Dave McKone CADD Designer ✓ ✓ Mike Home CADD Designer ✓ ✓ ✓ 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 City of Venice Water Main Replacement Program 6 Hillsborough County SCADA Standards 2 Middle Plantation Key Collection System 7 3 8 Bay Lift Station Condition Assessment 8 4 9 Waterway Estates Design-Build Pipeline 5 SR 585 Urban Corridor Improvements 10 Vd7`tu�t STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 50 ADE ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS I.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) RFQ 2014-346-YG PART CO.GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS ff©pa Thc@ branch o f ces,complete 0 Gcrgeo specific branch c 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Wade Trim, Inc. 1984 80-938-2575 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 815 NW 57th Avenue, Executive Office 200, Suite 06 a.TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Miami N/A 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME IF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Thomas Brzezinski, Executive Vice President N/A 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 786.505.6370 tbrzezinski @wadetrim.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) Bb.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Edwin Orr Engineering 1926 N/A Wade Trim, Inc 1966 N/A Wade Trim, Inc-Tampa 1984 N/A a EMPLOYEES DV DISCIPLINE Oa PROFILE @?FIRM'S EMPERIEN@EG ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE PCGI lIngT YEAR-S a.Function b.Discipline r Nn of Frry I c'ec a.Profile b.Experience `:.Revenue Index Code (I)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code Number(see below' 02 Administrative 50 00 B02 Bridges 3 08 CADD Technician 25 00 C08 Codes; Standards; Ordinances 1 12 Civil Engineer 50 00 C11 Community Facilities 2 15 Construction Inspector 22 00 C15 Construction Management 1 16 Construction Manager 15 00 D08 Dredging Studies &Design 1 21 Electrical Engineer Uti UU E02 Educational Facilities;ClassroomE 1 24 Environmental Scientist 06 00 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 2 29 GIS Specialist 00 00 E09 Environmental Impact Studies 2 38 Land Surveyor 06 00 G04 GIS Services 1 39 Landscape Architect 03 00 H07 Highways; Streets; Parking Lots 4 42 Mechanical Engineer 00 00 L03 Landscape Architecture 3 47 Planner: Urban/Regional 11 00 POb Planning (Community,Area) 4 48 Project Manager Included in other areas R04 Recreation Facilities 4 52 Sanitary Engineer 02 00 R06 Rehabilitation(Structures,Facilities) 1 57 Structural Engineer 02 00 R11 Rivers; Canals; Waterways 1 58 Technician/Analyst 55 00 504 Sewage Collection; Treatment 6 60 Transportation Engineer 27 00 S13 Stormwater Handling and Facilities 5 62 Water Resources Engineer 45 02 T03 Traffic and Transportation Eng. 4 Other Employees UO2 Urban Renewals; Development 6 Spec Writer 01 00 W02 Water Resources; Hydrology 5 WWTPO 22 00 W03 Water Supply; Dist.; Treatment 6 Z01 Zoning; Land Use Studies 4 Total 350 02 I I.ANNUALAVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1.Less than$100,000 6.$2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2.$100,000 to less than$250.000 7.$5 million CO less than$10 million a.Federal Work L 3.$250,000 to less than 500,000 8.$10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work q 4.$500,000 to less than$1 million 9.$25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work q 5.$1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE c Jj The foregoing is a statement of facts. / pre b.DATE a.SIGNATURE , ,a .r I 12/01/14 1�i��rl���� �, c.NAME AND TITLE t;J Tom Brzezinski, Executive Vice President STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 51 4 2. 2 Qualifications of " � � ; ...• Proposer Team ■ ; 1 1. t� - .- • Our years of experience delivering civil engi- neering services for multiple improvement Figure 2.2.1 Project Manager Information projects has proven that a key to overall project Holly Kremers, PE success is providing the proper organizational Education: structure to accommodate the varying needs of . BS, Environmental Engineering, all the projects. It is equally important to organize Michigan Technological a team with the required skills in a manner that is University easy for the City of Miami Beach to manage and • BS, Biological Sciences, provides easy access to staff without dealing with Michigan Technological different layers of individuals. University Project Manager Licenses/Certifications: • To maintain project continuity and give the overall PE,Florida,No.53737 civil services contract focus,our Project Organiza- Qualifications: tional Chart identifies a single point of contact for • 15 years'experience with Miami Beach. Holly Kremers, PE, will serve as utility design projects our Project Manager and primary contact person • Proficient in pump station,collection system, between the City of Miami Beach and our team. water main,and force main design Her hands-on leadership will provide continuity • Successfully managed and delivered utility as projects progress from development through projects on time and under budget construction. As the single point of contact, Holly will interact with Miami Beach staff regarding prof- Relevant Project Management Experience: • Sunset Harbour Stormwater Improvements ect details,budgets,and schedules,and rely on the expertise of team members to deliver the project. ' Palm&Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Figure 2.2.1 highlights some of Holly's experience. Improvements • FGUA Raw Water Transmission Mains Design Engineering Lead • Pasco Systems Utilities Expansion Recognizing that the City's projects will travel • City of Venice Water Main Replacement Program through differing phases until they are completed, . FGUA-Pasco County Utility Design we have supported our Project Manager with Dan- , FGUA Mad Hatter System Mapping&Modeling iel Garcia, PE, as the Design Engineering Lead. He will provide focus at key project delivery points • FGUA Lindrick Water System Improvements to ensure success every step of the way. • Seven Springs Master Lift Station Improvements Dan heads up Wade Trim's Miami office and has ' Hillsborough County SCADA Standards experience working with South Florida clients.Re- • Waterway Estates Design-Build Pump Station cent projects include the City of Miami Auger Hole Awards Remediation Program,Miami-Dade County Public • AWWA Region IV Volunteer of the Year,2012 Schools Engineering Renovation Projects,Broward • Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers County Signalization Improvement Program, and Engineering Excellence Award,2013 Intersection Improvements on US-1 and West Dixie • Water for People Kenneth J.Miller Founders Highway in Miami-Dade County. Award,2014 WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil Qualifications of Proposer Team f rnntinllPfl) Wade Trim's Delivery Team Table 2.2.1 highlights our supporting team's experi- Our delivery team is led by highly qualified indi- ence specific to projects relevant to this procurement. viduals proficient in resolving any technical issues Organizational Chart facing Miami Beach projects. These individuals are familiar with the requirements to perform the Along with having the best professionals in their services listed in the RFQ, and are confident they strongest positions,our organizational chart shown can meet project challenges. Their confidence is on page 54 includes key staff who have successfully based on years of solving similar issues for clients worked together in the past delivering similar proj- across the State.Our delivery team is organized by ects. Because our key staff have worked together the areas of project delivery consistent with the in the past, our team members understand their RFQ so the most qualified individuals are creating roles and responsibilities for the project,and ensure solutions where they have the most experience. services will be delivered seamlessly to the City of Miami Beach. Table 2.2.1 Wade Trim Relevant Projects c 2 E a c c a, O- .': L �[ Cl c 7 O _ O 2 O GJ +r+ " a+ _Q. O V a• = vzi N T ~4 i u d0 = u O O N $ Q W 'O fs GJ fC c cu fs = —1 O ri O < w u cu m 3 c Ln o .c p 0 ca 35 a, , -a y on oo 2 ,.L, << Q -2 = c 4, .N Q. Team Member Role i V •u & u a 3 g8 NE Tom Brzezinski, PE QA/QC v Eddie Fontanin, PE Utility Master Planning Amanda Warner,AICP GIS/Mapping Kurt Ahlgrim, PE Hydraulic Modeling v - v Mike Reineke, El Drainage/Stormwater r Dan Burden, Ph.D., PE Design Engineer Clayton McCormack, PE Design Engineer—Process v v aii, .. liptioa Oscar Duarte, PE Design Engineer—Mechanical v Ricardo Borromeo, PE Design Engineer Chris Little, PE Design Engineer . v Alan Schwab, PE Electrical/Instrumentation v ''`' v_.l ---perew, i John Kelley, PE Roadway Engineer/MOT Steve Wallace, PE Roadway Engineer l w Aimee Giacherio, PE Traffic Engineer Jeff Gilbert, PE Construction Inspection irialoo Gene Hoffman Construction Manager Inumelimmi . ., Nfr,,,,T71 Rhonda Busch Document Control Kameren Richard CADD Designer v 4 Dave McKone CADD Designer Mike Horne CADD Designer v v INWADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B—Engineering:Civil Qualifications of Proposer Team (continued) L 0 L ].L C C W C 4 .o O cu v y u a1 v 0 H fa Q v0 CO R 0 U 2 • • • C O V w C - O a co v m oo R .a = ro V N l.3 Cr c }r s + C O L Y Cl .0 all a --, o cc U u c 0 co N ~ 7' r s4 'C `� Y4 ] yJ VI L ._ N 91 ,9 f IA i Q C L 0 ti C et tat) Q.) , .-,,,.1 ,.71 u I— t., --a- .— 4,;,.. .25 (a te, c� r.+ O Q1 O i a C � V > O C ra o�S V C V1 0_•0 V C O .N v E vi C 01 = O +-+ a1 a1 v, ro vi rfl ( C V1 0 cu E 3 a., V C v, r6 C w • a. C •C W L -0 0, E A .- •i '' w C al C > C! d L i r0 .-, -, to C — -, C }' t C O ',. W f0 co ^ L1 V v O V a a1 Q Q1 y V C _' •� 0 v, I- = cc v, LL w 0 = Z 1- 3 v 0•I Y II = v >_ _ m a >. w : ; • 0 C1 O O C a Y w a w w w a c Y C d = v W ci 0_ v a_ a c_ d a o w 0 11J ` cu o J s v �o _ v c M s..x O C O , L C > a1 Y_nii,c V O a v Z .. xy Z .,>. -_,z,„," - • u i }3 7 a' �3E'Sm Vi:..'-;Y:,-,6:- K. s2 xr _ C w � � C 01 ra a ��� 'fl, s"1 tee , `ki, iPR" i c 0 C1 , .. ss;. N C ._ '^t L v+' Q i G aJ v, cr M V 0 .:N r_. . 1 V C g = C V1 5 l7 2 ). O o. 0. a 3 w V V1 a Q a w i a >_ _ c E V A' L L c r0 C R 0) .0 N O L ) a ¢ Y c w E MgT TxiM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 54 Group B-Engineering:Civil L � 2. 3 Financial Capacity �� .... - Wade Trim's Supplier Qualification Report from Dun&Bradstreet can be found on the following pages. WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil I 1 • D&B Dedde with Confidence WADE TRIM GROUP, INC. Supplier Analysis Report -., D-U-N-S® 03-986-6249 Headquarters Phone 313 961-3650 Purchase Date:11/03/2014 500 Griswold,Ste 2500, Fax 734-947-9726 Last Update Date:10/21/2014 Detroit,MI 48226 Attention:c Website: :. :.. www.wadetrim.com,. ,, , �� _ F r.LExecutive Summary , m,:. ,, a . 4. 4 Company Info Supplier Ev1 _ 7-51- Year Started 1979 I Risk Rating i CEO DOUGLAS WATSON,PRES Supplier Evaluation Employees 350 Risk Rating 1 In15-V Employees Here 30 at this location -- 6 5'� Working Capital $3,671,933 High Moderate Low Sales(Financial Statement) $48,797,895 6 ' Net Worth(Financial Statement) 4,339,092 I As of 12/31/2013 D&B Rating D&B PAYDEX® D&B Rating 3A3 Up to 24 month D&B PAYDEX Indulary ., Meehan Financial Strength Up to nth is at 78 3 A mo -- _ _____i_ mo• -1• i i♦� t days eo 100 h1H GGNFFF SE DC DC CC CB Be BA 1A 2A 3A 4A SA Greater 30 days Pty Arrtit tES than 120 slow days slow Si to 10 mtlkon Composite Credit Appraisal Up to 3 month D&B PAYDEX iiiUD p&tB o P3AmYDEth X I 8 O 1 50 _._.. 8D 100 4 3 2 1 Greater 30 Prompt Anticipates La Fain Gory High than 120 stover days slow D&B Viability Rating -17 - . A. .,� ,r 4-l?' i D&B Viability Rating ENNUI I Viability Score Portfolio Comparison 14 gill i__ � __� l�l� -- 9 5 1 9 5 1 KO Risk low Risk High Risk Low Risk ElData Depth Indicator II Company Profile INWADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 56 Group B-Engineering:Civil • D&B Decide with Confidence IA Financial Trade Company Years in Data Payments Size Business i I DGesoipire Predictive Available Available Large Established Supplier Risk Data i Supplier Evaluation Risk Rating Probability of Ceased Operations/Becoming Inactive The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S.businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 Supplier Evaluation 4 months. Risk Rating Probability of Supplier Ceased 1.3% NMI ' NM iii• Operations/Becoming Inactive 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 High Moderate Low Average Probability of Supplier Ceased 5.6% Operations/Becoming Inactive %of US Businesses with SER Rating 13% Supplier Risk Score Analysis Key Commentary The business has a Supplier Evaluation Risk(SER)Rating that shows: • Financial ratios • Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry Business Information Business Summary Credit Capacity Summary Branch&Division YES D&B Rating 3A3 Financing SECURED Financial FAIR Condition Prior D&B 3A3 SIC 8711 Financial Strength Rating Engineering Rating Date 10/21/2014 services, 3A management consulting Sal Pa ment Activity y y USD NH GO Ff EE DO DC CC CB Be BA IA 2A 3A 4A SA (based on 52 experiences) 541330 Average High $3,160 Engineering Credit Services History Status CLEAR Composite Credit Appraisal Highest 25,000 Credit Total Highest 119,300 Credit 4 3 2 1 Lrmmted Fair Good High D&B Viability Rating The D&B Viability Rating uses D&B's proprietary analytics to compare the most predictive business risk indicators and deliver a highly reliable assessment of the probability that a company will no longer be in business within the next 12 months. Viability Score INWADETRINI Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil • DISB Decide with Confidence Viability Score 1=7 -----I 9 5 1 High Risk Low Risk Compared to All US Businesses within D&B Database: •Level of risk: Low Risk •Businesses ranked 1 have a probability of becoming no longer viable: 0.2% •Percentage of businesses ranked 1:0.3% •Across all US businesses,the average probability of becoming no longer viable:14% Portfolio Comparison 9 5 1 High Risk Low Risk Compared to all Businesses within the same MODEL SEGMENT: Model Segment:Available Financial Data •Level of risk:Low Risk •Businesses ranked 2 within this model segment have a probability of becoming no longer viable: 0.2% •Percentage of businesses ranked 2 within this model segment:14% •Within this model segment,the average probability of becoming no longer viable:0.6% A Data Depth Indicator A Desc-pt,:a Predieive Data Depth Indicator Details: J Rich Firmographics J Extensive Commercial Trading Activity V Comprehensive Financial Attributes Financial Data Trade Payments Company Size Years in Business Company Profile Available Available Large Established (3+Trade) Company Profile Details: •Financial Data:Available •Trade Payments:Available(3+Trade) •Business Size:Large(Employees:50+or Sales:$500K+) •Years in Business:Established(5+) Business History FRANK TYMOWSKI,PRES,CHB-CEO; RALPH PICANO,SECRETARY—TREASURER-CFO; THOMAS BREZINSKI,EX V PRES-CHIEF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER; Page 3 or :1 WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 58 Group B—Engineering:Civil • Ddb Decide with Confidence TIMOTHY O'ROURKE,EXEC VICE PRES-CTO; ANDREW MCCUNE,EXEC V PRES-CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER; MARK COLEMAN,SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT; NICHOLAS LOMAKO,SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT; DAVID DI PIETRO,SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Director THE OFFICER(S) As of 10/21/2014 The Michigan Secretary of State's business registrations file showed that Wade Trim Group,Inc was registered as a corporation on January 3,1979. Business started 1979 by the officers.100%of capital stock is owned by 180 employees. FRANK TYMOWSKI.Background information is unavailable at this time. RALPH PICANO.Background information is unavailable at this time. THOMAS BREZINSKI.Background information is unavailable at this time. TIMOTHY O'ROURKE.Background information is unavailable at this time. ANDREW MCCUNE.Background information is unavailable at this time. MARK COLEMAN.Background information is unavailable at this time. NICHOLAS LOMAKO.Background information is unavailable at this time. DAVID DI PIETRO.Background information is unavailable at this time. AFFILIATE: The following is related through common ownership and/or financial interest:Wade-Trim/Ohio Inc,Independence,OH.Started'2001'.Operates as civil engineering. Business address has changed from 25251 Northline Rd,Taylor,MI,48180 to 500 Griswold,Ste 2500,Detroit,MI,48226. Business Registration q i27 ' CORPORATE AND BUSINESS REGISTRATIONS REPORTED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE OR OTHER OFFICIAL SOURCE AS OF Oct 28 2014: This data is for informational purposes only.Certification can only be obtained through the Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services, Bureau of Commercial Services,Corporation Division. WADE Registration ID 066818 Filing Date 01/03/1979 TRIM GROUP, Duration PERPETUAL Registered Agent RALPH INC. PICANO Status ACTIVE 500 Business Type CORPORATION vVhere Filed CORPORATIONS GRISWOLD Corporation Type PROFIT & 2500,STE DEVELOPMENT Incorporated Date 01/03/1979 BUREAU, DETROIT,MI LANSING,MI 482260000 State of Incorporation MICHIGAN ---- — a' Government Activity Summary Activity Summary Possible candidate for socioeconomic program consideration Borrower No Labor Surplus Area YES(2014) Small Disadvantaged No Administrative Debt No Small Business N/A HUB-Zoned Certified No Grantee No Women Owned N/A Historically Under Utilized No Party Excluded from No Minority Owned N/A Veteran Owned No Federal Programs Disadvantaged Business Enterprise No Vietnam Veteran Owned No Public Company N/A Ethnicity Classification N/A Disabled Owned No Congressional District 14,13 Historical College N/A Contractor No Classification Importer/Exporter N/A The details provided in the Government Activity section are as reported to Dun&Bradstreet by the federal government and other sources. Operations Data As of 10/21/2014 14 Ail r,gf is res,3Nec. of 11 lel WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 59 Group B-Engineering:Civil D68 Decide with Confidence Description: Provides engineering services,specializing in civil engineering(80%).Provides management consulting services, specializing in planning(15%). Fax:313.961.0898. Terms are on a retainer plus additional billings,contractual basis,on a fee basis and Net 30 days.Sells to general public, non profit organizations,commercial concerns and government.Territory:United States. Nonseasonal. Employees: 350 which includes officer(s)and 15 part-time.30 employed here. Facilities: Owns 39,000 sq.ft.in a two story brick building. Location: Suburban business section on main street. Industry Data SIC NAICS Code Description Code Description 87110402 Civil engineering 541330 Engineering Services 87420505 Planning consultant 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services f m.. Branches Domestic WADE TRIM GROUP, WADE TRIM GROUP, WADE TRIM GROUP, WADE TRIM GROUP, WADE TRIM GROUP, INC. INC. INC. INC. INC. (D-U-N-S®:85-908- (D-U-N-S®:78-225- (D-U-N-S®:07-850- (D-U-N-S®:00-523- (D-U-N-S®:12-761- 3359) 6130) 5469) 5469) 1650) 3300 PGA BLVD, 3790 DIXIE HWY NE 1100 SUPERIOR AVE 98310 OVERSEAS 271 MCCOY RD W, PALM BEACH STE D, E STE 1410, HWY, GAYLORD,MI 49735- GARDENS,FL 33410- MELBOURNE,FL CLEVELAND,OH KEY LARGO,FL 8253 2821 32905-2737 44114-2536 33037-2370 WADE TRIM GROUP, WADE TRIM GROUP, INC. INC. (D-U-N-S®:18-544- (D-U-N-S®:02-192- 2634) 4699) 10850 E TRAVERSE 1907 HARNEY ST, HWY STE 2250, OMAHA,NE 68102- TRAVERSE CITY,MI 2301 49684-1319 Subsidiaries Domestic FACILITIES WADE-TRIM,INC WADE TRIM WADE TRIM INC MANAGEMENT INC (MICHIGAN) ASSOCIATES,INC.; (D-U-N-S®:80-938- (D-U-N-S®:02-415- (D-U-N-S®:04-900- (D-U-N-S®:04-926- 2575) 5819) 0185) 3668) 8010 WOODLAND 39201 SCHOOLCRAFT AKA:WADE-TRIM 500 GRISWOLD ST CENTER BLVD STE RD STE B8, 3933 MONITOR RD, STE 2500, 1200, LIVONIA,MI 48150- BAY CITY,MI 48706- DETROIT,MI 48226- TAMPA,FL 33614- 1083 9292 4481 2421 This list is limited to the first 25 branches,subsidiaries,divisions and affiliates,both domestic and international.Please use the Global Family Linkage Link above to view the full listing. Financial Statements Three Years Comparative Statement Key Business Ratios(Based on 24 establishments) Fiscal Consolidated Fiscal Fiscal Dec 31 2011 Dec 31 2012 Dec 31 2013 This Industry Industry USD USD USD Business Median Quartile WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 60 ��7 Group B—Engineering:Civil • Ddb Decide with Confidence Curr Assets $15,133,569 $11,477,819 $12,602,970 Curr Liabs 13,910,818 10,214,433 8,931,037 Profitability Current Ratio 1.09 1.12 1.41 Return on Sales 3.9 3,5 2 Working Capital 1,222,751 1,263,386 3,671,933 Return on Net Worth 43.3 30.3 2 Other Assets 10,389,155 10,413,342 9,026,183 Short Term Solvency Worth 2,184,779 3,393,765 4,339,092 Current Ratio 1.4 2.2 4 Sales 48,400,442 42,690,422 48,797,895 Quick Ratio 1.1 1.8 4 Long Term Liab 7,740,131 8,282,963 8,359,024 Efficiency Net Profit(Loss) 597,976 438,872 1,878,733 Assets Sales 44.3 45.6 2 Sales/Net Working Capital 13.3 5.4 1 Utilization Total Liabs/Net Worth 398.5 75.5 4 As of 12/311201.3_ Most Recent Financial Statement Fiscal statement dated DEC 31 2013: USD Liabilities USD Current Assets Current Liabilities Cash $112,806 Accts Pay $4,251,740 Accts Rec 10,058,156 Short Term Bank Borrowings 396,068 Inventory 7,197 Accruals 922,704 Notes Rec 152,010 L.T.Liab-(1yr) 743,351 Refundable Income Taxes 275,867 Deferred Income Taxes 2,431,144 Deferred Income Taxes 715,281 Current Portion-Deferred Comp 186,030 Prepaid 1,281,653 Total Current Liabilities 8,931,037 Total Current Assets 12,602,970 Non Current Assets Non Current Liabilities Fixt&Equip 4,427,361 Deferred Compensation,Net Current 1,628,788 Deferred Income Taxes 562,030 L.T.Liab-Other 6,669,069 CSV of Life Ins. 1,941,385 Def.Credits/Income 61,167 Investments-Other 3,197 COMMON STOCK 174,797 Notes Receivable 435,901 ADDIT.PD.-IN CAP 3,439,536 Goodwill 1,610,324 RETAINED EARNINGS 724,759 Intangible Assets Net of Amon 45,985 Total Liabilities&Net Worth 21,629,153 Total Assets 21,629,153 As of 10/21/2014 From JAN 01 2013 to DEC 31 2013 annual sales$48,797,895.Gross profit$48,797,895;operating expenses$46,322,075.Operating income $2,475,820;other income$59,613;other expenses$1,292,326;net income before taxes$1,243,107;Federal income tax$(635,626).Net income $1,878,733. Statement Source Prepared from statement(s)by Accountant:Rehmann Robson LLC,Troy,MI. Accountant's Opinion The financial statement was reviewed by the accountant. On OCT 21 2014 Ralph Picano,CFO,submitted the above figures. • Indicators INT TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 61 Group B-Engineering:Civil I • D&B Decide with Confidence Public Filings Summary Public Filings The following data includes both open and closed filings found in D&B's database on this company Record Type Most Recent Filing Date Judgment 0 Lien 0 Suit 0 0 0 u. UCC 47 10/10/2013 Bankruptcy Judgment Lien Suit UCC The following Public Filing data is for information purposes only and is not the official record.Certified copies can only be obtained from the official source. Full Filings UCC Filings Collateral Leased Equipment including proceeds and products Latest Info 05/14/2012 Received Filing No. 2012047272-7 Type Original Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 03/29/2012 Secured Party SOMERSET CAPITAL GROUP,LTD.,MILFORD,CT TFG MICHIGAN,L.P.,SALT LAKE CITY,UT Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP,INC. Collateral Negotiable instruments including proceeds and products- Latest Info 06/27/2012 Account(s)including proceeds and products-General intangibles(s) Received including proceeds and products-Contract rights including proceeds and products-and OTHERS Type Assignment Filing No 2012072537-0 Date Filed 05/17/2012 Original UCC Fileci 03/29/2012 Original Filing No. 2012047272-7 Date Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Secured Party SOMERSET CAPITAL GROUP,LTD. SOMERSET LEASING CORP VI,MILFORD,CT Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP,INC. Collateral All Inventory including proceeds and products-All Account(s) Latest Info 06/03/2005 including proceeds and products-All Computer equipment including Received proceeds and products-All Fixtures including proceeds and products-and OTHERS Type Original Filing No. 2005069781-7 Date Filed 04/19/2005 Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Secured Party COMERICA BANK,LIVONIA,MI Debtor WADE-TRIM OPERATIONS SERVICES,INC. Filing No. 2009177486-0 Latest Info 03/02/2010 Received Original UCC Filed 04/19/2005 Date Type Continuation Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 12/18/2009 Secured Party COMERICA BANK,LIVONIA,MI Original Filing No. 2005069781-7 Debtor WADE-TRIM OPERATIONS SERVICES,INC. Collateral Leased Inventory and proceeds-Account(s)and proceeds-Leased Latest Info 11/22/2013 Assets and proceeds-General intangibles(s)and proceeds-and Received OTHERS Type Original Filing No. 2013146819-9 Date Filed 10/10/2013 INWADE TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil • DB Decide with Confidence Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Secured Party CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY,AS REPRESENTATIVE, SPRINGFIELD,IL Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP,INC. Collateral Leased Inventory and proceeds-Chattel paper and proceeds Latest Info 01/27/2005 Received Filing No. 2004251217-2 Type Original Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 12/29/2004 Secured Party CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION,SAN JOSE,CA Debtor WADE-TRIM GROUP,INC.,DETROIT,MI Collateral Assets including proceeds and products-Account(s)including Latest Info 05/30/2006 proceeds and products-General intangibles(s)including proceeds ' Received and products Type Original Filing No. 2006069838-0 Date Filed 04/18/2006 Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Secured Party COMERICA BANK,LIVONIA,MI Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP,INC Collateral Equipment Type ' Original Filing No. 2006088224-2 Date Filed 05/15/2006 Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Collected Date 06/15/2011 Secured Party DELL FINANCIAL SERVCES LP,AUSTIN,TX Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP INC i Filing No. 2011055393-1 Type Continuation ■ Original UCC Filed 05/15/2006 Date Filed 04/18/2011 Date Original Filing No 2006088224-2 Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Collected Date 06/16/2011 Secured Party DELL FINANCIAL SERVCES L P,AUSTIN,TX Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP INC Collateral Leased Computer equipment and proceeds Latest Info 07/25/2011 Received Filing No. 2011088496-8 Original UCC Filed 05/15/2006 Type Assignment Date ; Date Filed 06/20/2011 Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Original Filing No. 2006088224-2 Secured Party DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES L.P.,AUSTIN,TX LEAF FUNDING,INC.,PHILADELPHIA,PA I Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP INC I Collateral Leased Business machinery/equipment including proceeds and ! Latest Info 03/07/2011 I products • Received Filing No. 2010167737-4 Type Original Where Filed UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 12/22/2010 Secured Party IKON FINANCIAL SVCS,MACON,GA Debtor WADE-TRIM GROUP INC Collateral Leased Equipment including proceeds and products Latest Info 10/12/2007 ' Received Filing No. 2007136254-6 Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Type Original Date Filed 08/28/2007 Secured Party IKON FINANCIAL SVCS,MACON,GA Debtor WADE TRIM GROUP INC i illi T TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B—Engineering:Civil • D Decide with Confidence Collateral Leased Equipment including proceeds and products Latest Info 11/21/2006 Received Filing No. 2006181706-8 Type Original Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 10/28/2006 Secured Party IOS CAPITAL,MACON,GA Debtor WADE-TRIM GROUP INC Collateral Leased Equipment including proceeds and products Latest Info 10/12/2007 Received Filing No. 2006169578-9 Type Original Where Filed SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION,LANSING,MI Date Filed 10/06/2006 Secured Party IOS CAPITAL,MACON,GA Debtor WADE-TRIM GROUP INC The public record items contained in this report may have been paid,terminated,vacated or released prior to the date this report was printed. Additional UCC and SLJ filings for this company can be found by conducting a more detailed search in our Public Records Database. Paydex D&B PAYDEX® Shows the D&B PAYDEX scores as calculated up to 3 months and up to 24 months of payment experiences. Up to 3 month D&B PAYDEX Up to 24 month D&B PAYDEX = High risk of late payment(average Up to 3 month p indt.stry 30 to 120 days D&B PAYDEX 80 Mc ar beyond terms) -- -, Up to 24 month ��- 088 PAYDEX 7H 1 50 80 100 Medium risk of late Gf- 30 days Prompt Arncroates payment(average � , M_- char,•_. 30 days or less ,,,,;.;:,i 1 50 80 100 beyond terms) Greater Dm,- • When weighted by dollar amount,payments to suppliers average Within terms.Based on payments collected over last 3 months. • Low risk of late When weighted by dollar amount,payments to suppliers payment(average average 3 days beyond terms.Based on payments prompt to 30+ collected up to 24 months. days sooner) When weighted by dollar amount,the industry average is 2 DAYS BEYOND terms. Payment Trend unchanged' Total Payment Experiences 52 Highest Now Owing $20,000 o for the HQ Highest Past Due $500 Payments Within Terms 94% Total Placed for Collection 0 Average High Credit $3,160 Largest High Credit $25,000 •compared to payments three months ago Payment Summary The Payment Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report. There are 52 payment experiences in D&B's file,with 30 experiences reported during the last three month period. The highest Now Owes on file is$20,000.The highest Past Due on file is$500. Top 10 Industries Industries Total Total Amounts Largest High Within Days Slow(%) Received Credit Terms(%) 0-30 31-60 61-90 90+ Misc business service 5 $45,000 $20,000 100 0 0 0 0 Whol office equipment 5 7,950 5,000 100 0 0 0 0 Short-trm bush credit 4 25,850 25,000 100 0 0 0 0 INWA.DETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 64 Group B—Engineering:Civil • D&B Decide with Confidence Nonclassified 2 6,000 5,000 17 83 0 0 0 Radiotelephone commun 1 15,000 15,000 100 0 0 0 0 Paper mill 1 2,500 2,500 100 0 0 0 0 Mfg envelopes 1 2,500 2,500 100 0 0 0 0 Police protection 1 2,500 2,500 100 0 0 0 0 Who'service paper 1 2,500 2,500 100 0 0 0 0 Mfg switchgear-boards 1 1,000 1,000 100 0 0 0 0 OTHER INDUSTRIES 16 6,150 1,000 88 4 0 0 8 Other Payment Categories Category Total Received Total Dollar Amounts _-y;ast H,,y Cry,_:it Cash Experiences 14 $2,350 $500 Payment record unknown 0 0 0 Unfavorable comments 0 0 0 Placed for Collection 0 0 0 Detailed Payment History Date Reported Paying Record High Credit Now Owes Past Due Selling Terms Last Sale within(months) September 2014 Disc $2,500 $250 $0 N/A 1 Ppt 0 50 0 N/A Ppt 25,000 15,000 0 N/A 1 Ppt 20,000 20,000 0 N/A 1 Ppt 15,000 10,000 0 N/A 1 Ppt 7,500 2,500 0 N/A 1 Ppt 7,500 2,500 0 N/A 1 Ppt 5,000 1,000 0 Lease Agreemnt 1 Ppt 5,000 2,500 0 N/A 1 Ppt 5,000 750 0 N/A 1 Ppt 2,500 500 0 Lease Agreemnt 1 Ppt 2,500 0 0 N/A 1 Ppt 2,500 0 0 N/A 4-5 Ppt 1,000 1,000 0 N30 1 Ppt 1,000 0 0 N/A 4-5 Ppt 750 750 0 N/A 1 Ppt 750 0 0 N/A 1 Ppt 750 100 0 N/A 1 Ppt 500 500 0 N/A 1 Ppt 250 0 0 Lease Agreemnt 2-3 Ppt 250 100 0 N/A 1 Ppt 100 100 0 Lease Agreemnt 1 Ppt 100 0 0 N/A 1 Ppt 100 0 0 N/A 1 (026) 500 0 0 Cash account 1 (027) 500 0 0 Cash account 6-12 (028) 250 0 0 Cash account 2-3 August 2014 Ppt 100 0 0 N/A 6-12 IAT TRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 65 Group B-Engineering:Civil I • MB Decide with Confidence (030) 250 0 0 Cash account 1 June 2014 Ppt 1,000 0 0 N/A 6-12 Slow 250 0 0 N/A 1 (033) 50 0 0 Cash account 1 April 2014 Slow 30 (035) 100 0 0 Cash account 1 (036) 100 0 0 Cash account 1 (037) 100 0 0 Cash account 1 January 2014 Ppt 100 100 0 N/A 1 December 2013 Ppt 100 0 0 N/A 6-12 November 2013 Ppt 250 0 0 N/A 6-12 Ppt 50 0 0 N/A 2-3 September 2013 (042) 50 0 0 Cash account 1 July 2013 (043) 250 0 0 Cash account 6-12 June 2013 Ppt 0 0 0 N/A 1 Ppt 2,500 0 0 N/A 1 Ppt 500 250 0 N/A 1 (047)Satisfactory 750 0 0 N/A 6-12 May 2013 (048)Satisfactory 250 0 0 N/A 1 (049) 50 0 0 Cash account 2-3 (050) 50 0 0 Cash account 2-3 1 October 2012 (051) 50 0 0 Cash account 1 (052) 50 0 0 Cash account 1 Lines shown in red are 30 or more days beyond terms Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted.In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of disputes over merchandise,skipped invoices etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier.Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. II g WTnETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 66 Group B-Engineering:Civil 1 Tab • • Approach Methodology • WAL)ETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Group B-Engineering:Civil • JET, •yam' ��1 — -. Approach. Et Methodology Wade Trim is a full-service, consulting engi- In the paragraphs that follow, we describe our neering firm that provides day-to-day design project approach to several services to give you and construction engineering services to support an understanding of how we work with our clients municipal projects as well as a full array of more to complete a project. Each of our methodologies specialized services. Under this procurement we proposed can be altered to better suit the needs would focus our efforts on the areas of qualification of the City. such as water supply, treatment and distribution; The City of Miami Beach desires to implement"task sewage collection, treatment, and disposal; util- order"-type projects to resolve issues quickly and ity relocations; reclaimed water transmission and cost-effectively when they arise in the City's ever distribution; stormwater handling and facilities; growing utility system and ever changing regula- and highways and streets.WadeTrim also provides tory requirements.The project types contained in several civil engineering support services in-house, the RFQ must be addressed to provide a product including electrical and instrumentation, HVAC, that satisfies the needs and expectations of Miami structural,and planning/GIS.Through the delivery Beach relative to lower capital and life cycle costs, of such services,on an as-needed basis,our goal is to become the City's trusted advisor. and enhanced operation efficiency, along with a reduction in overall maintenance requirements. Implementation Plan Special attention will also be paid to safety in all The nature of the work described in the scope of aspects of the designs that incorporate smoothly services includes having Wade Trim provide aasis- in the land use of the surrounding area. tance,on a continuing contract basis,to complete A clear, well-defined approach integrated into a a multitude of engineering projects. These proj- proven project management program will success- ects are to have professional fees at a level where fully deliver these Miami Beach projects. response time will need to be quick and projects Wade Trim understands that each project has delivered in a manner to keep costs to a minimum. Our intent is to remain flexible in our approach specific needs, depending on the project type. by adjusting both the type and level of service to Delivering the technical part of projects must be meet the City's changing project needs, keeping approached using different staff, technical theo- the overall goals of Miami Beach in mind. ries, and problem-solving techniques. However, there are base fundamentals that we use when we Our approach is to work together with City staff to approach each project,including project manage- achieve the common goal of delivering success- ment, proper resource allocation, a prescriptive ful products. We will provide individual propos- project delivery system,a strong quality assurance/ als for each project our office is requested to be quality control program, stringent schedule and involved in. This will provide Miami Beach with budget controls,ensuring project value,and com- a clear understanding of the scope, project cost, munity awareness. and schedule required to complete each project. I+] WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 68 Group B—Engineering:Civil Approach & Methodologyjcontinued) Schedule & Budget Management Resource Allocation Through Effective Project The Wade Trim Team has a diverse and local talent Management base.Our staff expertise and previous work experi- ence success of a project begins with leadership.Our ence in Florida and on the national level allow us p g p to assign the best-suited staff to each project.Hav- project management process is interactive and in- ing the right staff properly allocated to the project cludes sharing information,building relationships, will provide technical solutions the City can stand involving affected parties,and creating a vision.It behind,as well as meet the budgets established at includes tasks such as organization, communica- the beginning of the effort. tion,documentation,scheduling,establishing and monitoring budgets,ensuring quality control and, We will allocate resources to focus the majority when necessary,conflict resolution.We have used of the effort on the technical portion of a project. this process on all types of projects similar to those Being local, our management and administration in the City's RFQ. staff have other local projects they are working on, Holly Kremers, PE,will serve as our Project Man- allowing us to spend only time that's needed on alter and be the primary contact person between a certain project. In light of this, our typical staff the City of Miami Beach and our team. Her hands- allocation on projects of this type is: on leadership will provide continuity as projects Project Management(Managerial) 10% progress from ideas to construction and start-up to Technical 75% commissioning.Holly will be responsible for sched- uling, budgeting, conducting, and documenting Administrative Support(Administrative) 10% client meetings. She will prepare and monitor Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5% all project schedules and budgets, and provide monthly status reports to the City. Holly will plan, Once a scope of work is identified,Wade Trim will implement, and document our quality assurance allocate needed staff,matching project needs with procedures. staff skills. Using our local talent pool, combined with our national staff,we will assign the best avail- The first and most fundamental step in an assign- able staff to the project.As staff is brought into the ment-based contract is project accountability of area to complete the work, Wade Trim will NOT team members. Team members must fully and put this cost on the project and will NOT pass this clearly understand what is expected of their work, expense to Miami Beach. themselves, and how their activities relate to the overall project scope and schedule.Project assign- Project Delivery Plan ments will need quick response times with aggres- Wade Trim follows a prescriptive project delivery sive budgets. To develop and maintain project plan in our approach to every project.We approach accountability of our team members, Wade Trim our projects by dividing the delivery plan into prepares a comprehensive communication plan eight tasks that are clearly defined,scheduled,and designed to identify responsibilities, reporting monitored as the work progresses. requirements,and performance monitoring.Once these responsibilities are established, monthly Task 1:Data Collection/Evaluation-Collect and progress meetings will be held with appropriate evaluate available data on the various elements of members of the team to monitor progress and keep the work. design team members accountable for the work. Task 2:Technical Memorandum - Develop and evaluate the pros and cons of project alternatives considering constructability, current equipment conditions,and current O&M issues. WADETRII�i Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 69 Group B—Engineering:Civil Approach & MethodologyJcontinued) Task 3: Site Plan Development - After concep- Our quality control program goes significantly tual development, a site plan will be developed further than this,starting with the staff themselves. that communicates the solutions to Miami Beach, We ensure staff have the necessary technical re- regulatory agencies,and other stakeholders. sources.to perform the work as well as the right Task 4: Project Design - Plan development at background and work experience. Our staff have extensive in-house and out-of-house training de 30%, 60%, 90%, and final completion. At each of g these milestones, construction estimates will be signed to fine-tune specific technical skills,as well prepared. as keep them current with our industry. Task 5:Permitting-Identify needed permits and Project Value assist Miami Beach in obtaining the same. At the project level,value can be measured under three separate categories: Task 6: Bidding & Procurement - Prepare bid documents and provide post-bid award recom- 1. Value of short-/long-term operation and mendations. maintenance costs 2. Value of a completed project's life expectancy Task 7: Construction Management - Provide a proven proactive,problem avoidance,construction 3. Value of the overall capital investment system that delivers a quality project within project (constructing more than just the"bare bones") budgets and schedule. While each category is independent,it is the com- Task 8: Final Report-A project close-out report bination of these that defines a project's overall and the submittal of project files and deliverables value and the delivery of a project meeting the will be provided to Miami Beach as the final project owner's expectations. action. Vital to establishing and understanding value is ef- Our work plan for each task is designed to facilitate fective communication between the design team the development and implementation of an effec- and the owner. In the assignment of a project's tive task-specific work plan.Based on the informa- value, Miami Beach staff is key to project success. tion available and the work completed to date on Their knowledge of operation and maintenance a project,some of the steps described above could skills and needs, cost of capital and its proper im- be eliminated. pact, and long-term vision for improvements are necessary for the completed work to reflect the Quality Assurance/Quality Control most value for the City's investment. Wade Trim's Quality Control program is a continu- Our team uses proven methods to include Miami ous process that begins with the Project Manager, Beach staff in the design and construction that our individual responsible for quality on the proj- minimizes their time and maximizes their input. ect. Senior level managers and officers of Wade Every successful project begins with a solid execu- Trim will support our Project Manager.Depending tion plan, clearly understood by all project team on the project type being worked on,we will match members.The level of effort required and project senior level staff expertise with project type to en- outcome reflect the quality of the plan.When stake- sure the most complete review of our deliverables. holders participate in the initial planning stages As noted earlier, Wade of a project, they take ownership. Our team will Quality Control Trim typically commits use a technique called"interactive planning"that RECORD DOCUMENT 5% of a project's total we have used on many of our projects. Input is Checked °"°: budget to Quality Con- solicited in a single,initial meeting,simultaneously Ba`k`d` from staff from operations, maintenance, design, Ces;wed: °aw. trol. However, this only "°'"'°d °°`" represents our efforts construction,and other departments. IS] WADETRIM during our formal in- house review meetings. W�DETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services 70 Group B-Engineering:Civil ■ &pro oiCh & Pflet odo]osn i co lnued1 To clearly portray project design issues,we will use Community awareness needs to focus on public Three-Dimensional CAD. Through this method, education and understanding as much as public equipment layouts and potential conflicts are feedback. A well-educated and aware citizenry found prior to construction. Typically, drawings ensures that decisions are reached for the overall allow the end user and project team to visualize public good of the community as opposed to in- the completed project and amenities.This tool can dividualistic or selfish motives. assist the team in laying out equipment and utili- Ongoing communication with Miami Beach leader- ties to reduce project conflicts and facilitate future ship is a critical component with public infrastruc- operation and maintenance needs,thereby reduc- ture projects. City leaders are often the first point ing O&M costs-an important value for any client. of contact for the public with questions or concerns It is this type of interaction that defines a projects regarding their projects. These leaders must be value and helps the team deliver a project with the briefed on a regular basis to have the knowledge most value for the City's investment. needed to respond in an informed and respon- CommunityAwareness sible manner.These briefings may take the form of presentations, progress reports,or one-on-one The success of projects often hinges on the edu- cation and understanding of the general public meetings.The exact nature of the briefings will be and other governmental and regulatory agencies determined on a project and issue-specific basis. regarding the need for the project and the pro- Wade Trim has developed a wide range of innova- posed solution.Well-intentioned projects without tive public information processes and printed and adequate public education and understanding are digital communications for public infrastructure easily derailed based on fears or misunderstand- projects and issues. From public information bro- ings. One of the primary values of the Wade Trim chures to extensive project information websites, team is to ensure there is full and diverse public Wade Trim will assist Miami Beach in presenting participation and education in the development technical information in understandable terms. of all of our projects. The extent of the public Wade Trim provides multimedia services including involvement process is dependent upon the spe- 3-D animation, video production, and interactive cific projects and related issues. Contact with the media services to aid in the interactive design pro- citizens and property owners could take the form cess, and will aid Miami Beach in communicating of phone calls, mail outs,or community meetings, its project information with larger audiences. depending upon the specific project issues. The Wade Trim Project Team will work with Miami Beach to actively inform and involve the public, press,and other governmental or regulatory agen- ~ ..�,�i°'�� 7 cies in projects through thorough and inclusive community awareness and public information PI programs. This allows the Project Team to assist the City in finding an a roach to reach these '' " a ' audiences and developing materials that convey technical information in understandable terms.The public involvement process will be tailored to the specific project and specific issues and will strive �` °--� to inform the public and stakeholders to ensure successful projects. Wade Trim uses public meetings to ensure stakeholder involvement in projects. EIDEm Professional Architectural&Engineering Services Ell Group B-Engineering:Civil Approach & ethodaiog jcontinued) Self-Performed Scope of Services Using regularly scheduled staffing discussions, Wade Trim prides itself on the level of service we our Project Managers formally meet and discuss provide our clients. As a full-service engineering existing staffing demands on our workload.This firm, we have the ability and technical resources discussion projects our existing and future work- to provide all of the services denoted in Figure load over a 12-month period to ensure both cur- 2.1.1 on page 18. rent contracts and those being pursued will be adequately staffed.This effort is then coordinated All staff listed in our organizational chart are Flori- at our corporate level so that staff throughout the da-based Wade Trim employees who will be deliv- organization can cover all the work when needed, ering all of the services under this contract.Should to ensure ALL project schedules are met.This pro- additional staff be required to deliver the scope of active process determines the need for additional work, our local team will request assistance from staff and changes can be made promptly while our employees located in our 18 regional offices. schedules are not adversely impacted. Workload Disadvantaged Business Enterprise The members of the Wade Trim Team have immedi- Participation ate project availability,and we understand how to Wade Trim understands the importance of includ- work within the challenges of continuing services- ing Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)firms type contracts. Our availability and knowledge of on our team.Although it is the City's objective that the delivery process and project types uniquely the majority of the services under this procurement positions us to assist Miami Beach with its projects, be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than since we understand the project scope,have been subconsultants), we will prioritize the use of DBE actively identifying and resolving similar project subconsultants whenever a specialty service that challenges on our other projects, and have a de- Wade Trim cannot self-perform is requested by livery team ready to move forward. the City. Our staffing plan includes our Project Manager and support staff primarily dedicated to the City's projects from concept through design until the completion of construction to ensure that a con- densed, focused team will keep design fees at a minimum while project schedule milestones are met. If further support is needed and specialized resources need to be called upon,we will mobilize the best available resources from our national pool of 350 professionals. If these professionals travel to Miami Beach to support this project, the City will NOT be charged any travel time or associated expenses. ■S WADETRIM Professional Architectural&Engineering Services El Group B—Engineering:Civil WADETRIM 815 NW 57th Avenue Executive Office 200,Suite 06 Miami.FL 33126 786.505.8370 www.wadetrim.com I �