Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
aa ►c-()slog/ AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES.ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE: GENERAL ARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 29 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 34 ATTACHMENT C 35 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 5 day of January , 2016, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. a NEW YORK corporation having its principal office at 901 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Suite 900, Coral Gables, FL 33134 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015- 29041, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, 4 which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents.shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or • 5 excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. . CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand • dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change 6 Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, •drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of. the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance:with_,the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or mayy be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five 7 (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement: SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. 8 • STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental.items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall Service Order signed by the C y g J 9 Y countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and.represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: • No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. 10 extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment .ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In i hts and remedies which the addition to all other r City Y ma Y have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and.equipment and - erformance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services rep y 9 (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by 11 the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed. (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the 12 Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide, the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, . IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans 13 and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement. and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the'responsibility.for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for • payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or ' approval under the Contract Documents. The Project requiring City's app 1 ect Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and 14 insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve a rove or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or • comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the 15 • sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the.cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project,within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any 17 resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to n such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall commencement of any Y contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). • "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work 18 involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5 g .2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by,City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 19 • ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the. Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for 20 Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 • ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 • violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by.Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. • 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors,' omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that, all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. • 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. • ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: • City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: . City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 901 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Suite 900 Coral Gables, FL. 33134 Attn: Elvira Freire-Santamaria, AIA (GENERAL ARCHITECTURE) Attn: Sean Compel, P.E. (CIVIL ENGINEERING) Tel: (305) 445-2900 Fax: (780) 917-7330 Email: elvira.freire-santamaria @stantec.com Email: sean.compel @stantec.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant ,warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Proiect Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, 26 • • • • including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written • consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole • option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. 27 Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these pre I be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attestea''•y respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day an• - r first hereinabove written/ Attest =rte' \ B C ''����c�. TY OF MIA / %/ • O MA BE,� 411/ ....... - 7 CITY LERK ,�,�,,,y �;' OR L Attest : al; T' �'• TING SFpRVIOE , INC. 1,NcoRP ORATED: � Zr`O. At Jr 41.,W, I/3 Sign`r /-, Assistant Sew etary = c Sig" re/P, -sident csrAL&I Q. S co ; C! I ' Rcrn-1 (cSit I APPROVED AS TO Print NdrnP Print Name FORM& LANGUAGE 28 &FOR EfXECUTION I I Or' (2- 1(00 City AttorneYP Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 901 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Suite 900 Coral Gables, FL. 33134 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to • the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal osal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. p Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 7 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Engineer (Coastal or $116.15 Project Principal $172.50 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager (Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction AdministratorlManager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 • CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/ GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/ GPS . $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector (CEI) $103.50 Inspector (CEI, Field or $ 94 88 Construction) • 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS Discipline: General Architecture • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. Discipline: Civil Engineering • Rosenberg Gardner Design, Inc. Role: Landscape Architectural Services • Longitude Surveyors, LLC Role: Surveying Services • Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. Role: Geotechnical Engineering Services 32 ACS D CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 11/26/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT TAMMIE BESON AON REED STENHOUSE INC. �N1-780-423-9462(A/ o,Ext): (A/AC,No):1-780-423-9876 900-10025-102A AVENUE ADDRESS:TAMMIE.BESON aL AON.CA EDMONTON AB T5J 0Y2 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A: INSURED INSURER B: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. INSURER C: 901 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.,#900 INSURER D: CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 INSURER E: CERTAIN U/W'S AT LLOYDS OF LONDON 37540 INSURER F: (BEAZLEY) COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1362 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE IANSDR SVWD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS (MMIDD/YYYY) (MMIDD/YYYY) GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $ CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ ' 7 POLICY JE LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS AUTO-0OWNED PROPERTY accidentDAMAGE UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N TORY LIMITS ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEn N/A E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ • E PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY N/A QC1505150 08/01/15 08/01/16 CLAIM&AGGREGATE LIMIT$3,000,000 INCLUDING CONTRACTOR'S INCLUSIVE OF COSTS/CLAIMS MADE BASIS. POLLUTION LIABILITY NO RETROACTIVE DATE DEDUCTIBLE$100,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) CORAL GABLES, FL. RFP STANTEC PROJECT#PIPELINE#472478 . CLIENT PROJECT#RFQ NO. 2014-346-YG/RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041, RE: PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS"PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG. THE COVERAGE SHALL NOT BE CANCELLED OR NON RENEWED EXCEPT AFTER THIRTY(30)DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN C/O INSURANCE TRACKING SERVICES, INC. (ITS) ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. P.O. BOX 20270 LONG BEACH, CA 90801 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD � l �� DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) AWR®� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 11/26/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT ANDREA OTTO AON REED STENHOUSE INC. HONE Ext):1-952-807-0679 FAX No): AON RISK SERVICES CENTRAL,INC. ADDRESS: 900-10025-102A AVENUE INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# EDMONTON,AB T5J 0Y2 INSURER A: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 16535 INSURED INSURER B: SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY 24988 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. INSURER C: ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY 901 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD,SUITE 900 INSURER D: SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY 24988 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-3070 INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1465 REVISION NUMBER: 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INTRR TYPE OF INSURANCE IAN NR W D POLICY NUMBER /YPOLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DDYYY) A GENERAL LIABILITY X X GLO5415704 05/01/15 05/01/16 EACH OCCURRENCE _ $ 2,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL L IABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTED occurrence) $ 300,000 CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR XCU COVER INCLUDED MED EXP(Any one person) _ $ 10,000 X CONTRACTUAL/CROSS PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 X OWNERS& GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 POLICY X JECOT- X LOC DEDUCTIBLE $ $150,000 B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X X 90-17043-08 05/01/15 05/01/16 SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ NON-OWNED PROPERTY HIRED AUTOS AUOS accident) $ C X UMBRELLA LIAR X OCCUR 8831307 05/01/15 05/01/16 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 X EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE EXCESS GENERAL,AUTO AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000 DED X RETENTION$10,000 AND EMPLOYERS $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X 90-17043-06 05/01/15 05/01/16 X TORY IM TS ER D AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEn N/A E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) CORAL GABLES, FL. RFP STANTEC PROJECT#PIPELINE#472478. CLIENT PROJECT#RFQ NO. 2014-346-YG/RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041, RE: PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS"PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG. THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH IS INCLUDED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED BUT ONLY ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED.WAIVER OF SUBROGATION IS INCLUDED. THE COVERAGE SHALL NOT BE CANCELLED OR NON RENEWED EXCEPT AFTER THIRTY(30)DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER AND ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. ENDORSEMENT#CG 20 10 07 04 AND PC AUTO CA 20 48 02 09 ARE ATTACHED. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN C/O INSURANCE TRACKING SERVICES, INC. (ITS) ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. P.O. BOX 20270 LONG BEACH, CA 90801 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as 9 P Y 9 follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest' ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /9 day of 7fJ72O15. ATTEST: It C (l ///// /yr Rafael E. ranado, City 1..A:•��1 `tllaiPhilip Le V- 11:f-01: A - , T:\AGENDA120151June1PR000RS ENT12014- ta ofesgiona g hit-•:{.,=land Engineering Services-Reso.docx * INCORP ORATED' .14 °4.11�°H 26,. APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION l,0 3 •�5 City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount • Account Funds: I The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: epartment Director Assi: .' Manager City M AD eECX DM MT 'IV JLM /4I' T:\AGEND Iry 015\June\PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa •• x • 143 AGENDA 1 M MIAMI C 7 B E ACH DATE 6-,10-is- MIAMI BI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members he City Co / ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager ` DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Barmello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar&Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the "Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RFQ#?A .6-YG I I I 1 s Arehitietueai acicr EngWneeritgiService. LOW _.;,>' `( AND PE Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE •1f/t FUTURE : Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 b 4 1 4, AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES.INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 7 3 tT_ CRAVEN.THOMPSON& '` ASSOCIATES.INC. 1 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 _ 4 MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES.INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 - 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES.INC. 70 6 69 4 70 6 16 6 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE r �Profossioni rci •, .. a ant ' (G.E� ° �. Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE ,77. . ,;.,.k Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking - TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE& i.' INTERIOR DESIGN.INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 Iii 8 1 GLAVOVIC STUDIO.INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES. INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING t SERVICES.INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7 I 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS,INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 17 7 WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS,P.A 87 4 78 9 75 10 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS.INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 34 11 CPH,INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 35 12 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS.P.C. 57 12 70 12 55 14 '= 38 13 CIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 70 12 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ,RFQ,# O14- YG '. ''P(essioME m' ,Arch1tectUia�- d ` LOW On.irieerM Services;' Deborah Rogelio Valeria ° AGGREGATE (TOWN PLANNING),;'.: Tackett Ranking Madan . Ranking Mejia Ranking ,; TOTALS Rank ZYSCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 0' 1 , THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 . 2 76 2 83 2 1 6 2 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE V ;E!rois y, ti. z , y . 3 i�►F- FAC101 LQ�L t j s-' 1;f1,.a'<s A'` ; Deborah Rogelio I Valeria AGGREGATE ;!''.,:2,-, • *, A F Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking . Mejia Ranking p;` TOTALS Rank R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS.P.A. 100 1 99 1 90 1 3 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ,,y, ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 90 1 "'t 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 96 2 91 3 75 4 `i:, 9 3 BENDER 8 ASSOCIATES ■ ARCHITECTS t,f`" ARCHITECTS,P-A- 83 4 84 4 I 80 3 r 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING ''RF4 2Q1 -YG,Prcfess ia,[, Archfteal. ,61. an4 Engtn4@TFni ,- , LI5 i' .��rv��E�digt6iiiG Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking T TA S Rank WADE TRIM,INC. - 95 95 2 97 1 81 8 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 : { 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 10 90 6 96 1 k I 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 . I 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, INC. 96 1 95 _ 3 62 24 :i:: i 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY.INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 i 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 94 3 87 _ 11 70 18 '� I 32 9 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 13 86 12 74 11 ,; 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, r INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 u" 39 15 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 . 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 `; 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES.INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 •• 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, 1 ' p'- INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 66 21 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING,INC. 68 25 77 19 60 26 .. 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 26 73 23 61 25 1 74 26 LAND SURVEYING __ .---,..:04#2i1 4.346.YG • ", <Pr iieiii onal Architectural' .;.'Eli .Si'i c ea,r:'` LOW j Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE (LAND G)'.,h>, Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking : OTALS Rank SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC_ 100 1 96 1 80 2 _ 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 A- 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 iii:' 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 _- 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 4 84 6 69 5 ,• 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING,INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES. 4 INC. 77 8 75 9 60 9 514 26 9 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 For Group 4, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING Rr"Q#2014-346-YES€ Pm1f sslonai''Arc iiteetUrat acid `Enqirteerllg LOW 411ECHANiCAL,ELECTRI Oniel Jose A. Sabrina ,' AGGREGATE ',_, D'1 I.tJMS VG " ;;:,, Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 I 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 7 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD l:r Consulting Engineers 73 3 87 2 85 3 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:IAGENDA12015 1June\PROCUREMENT\2014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one(51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the ro osals received under the aforementioned P P disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:I AGENDA\20151June\PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx • APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION City Attorney Date 155 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 156 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 i\AIAJ\/\i: I3E.1AçH: City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33 i 39,www.miamibeachFl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 . REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2. 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received . Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office III then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 & 6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question #71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 / 2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these.sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in.Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications". In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 J Yusl miamibeachfl. @ g belGonzalez ov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a Pro•• �.�► 1 47.—;1 ' Denis Procurement Director MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1 700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,,.vww.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B — Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement" from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring" from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION. The following clause has been added to Appendix D —Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;" It is up to the Proposers discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. 1 Q2: Section Cl. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? • A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete A/E teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term, we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, '7t is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together (one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting, we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. Al 1: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted.". As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section Cl. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of.the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 — Approach and Methodology, "it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, 'it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A & B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting. and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as,a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as `verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida. or Miami-Dade County.' Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers) Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2"d underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1st underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 12 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects. performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and enaineer. include information for five (5) relevant projects. performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the `Proposing Firm'. The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer'in each firm / team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, ''It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select NE Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full A/E Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question n 7 in this Addendum. 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online'? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or "Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400 — Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a — it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staff's diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question #24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to "term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The "user name" is the same as the"email address": yusbelgonzalez r�Jmiamibeachfl.aov Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A & Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA,.INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS i KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS & ATKINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. j LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO &ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC i MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN &ASSOCIATES '1 BENDER &ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL&PARTNERS C O'LEAR`( RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY I PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI & PARTNERS, INC. j RED DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD &ASSOCIATES i ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP, INC. CALVIN, GIORDANO &ASSOCIATES SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC I SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOC INC CES CONSULTANTS, INC. SHULMAN &ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC j TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED j THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP I TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA, INC. j WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason, we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q64: In regard to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural & Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 12 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 12 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, # 2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300— Submittal Instructions and Format- TAB 2 - Experience & Qualifications, we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I - Sections, A-C; and sections F - Example Projects; G - Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II —General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections D-Organizational Chart and E — Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, # 2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under "specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design / Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A — Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled '`Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A & B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category (minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "lt is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this. denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix 'C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado©miamibeachfl.gov. I Procurement Contact: I Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 1 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez©miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the `Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos i/ n e rel- / f lex,Denis J—P Director 14 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 1 , 2014 15 MAi\ABEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" N4MIE - • - COMPANY NAME, iPEIONg# FAY# (PLEASE PRINT) E-M AIT ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMLB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel,zonzalezra miamibeachti.tzov ext. 6230 AtUZ s. h1 PS-MA o ss B A?J E€( .4 1 3D5 S -0-13 a vmgS'i■rePa@ v655104\1'. cowl Ai'De) LAZICe2 1 _- 1 JS 2 U-'?, -Z36- . 1z51 4 -flay e ma riLan fort .604ceett berme Itotyrii t. (0.4 g 37°2, 9 5gisO 3 (( NA C i f- ,`' �` S t 1i\ �- 1'��i C��`��t t e kua,/-r _. 00' c\Cj 305-145-NW 3°5- f7`i..61277 `\JS•C O-_,R%z\l ��} S�►`R�1�°'�_.C� .C,�tti t G z p 3e,5-. G'71. 3°5. Cr."73 . m ToGti� a t '7 3 p,41,A0) 2 Tl�4774,52_ ,1/1 3 - G /P DAy-avi /l• �:1 b 77d /&rileZ ,;_e , 4 to Z4 rdect rcr zoz.z rrbehQr. cewi DA VEAilarl 6 -j c.N.t .5-Der 3(kJ Li 5 Ci lq-57CC Itavoo C-41.-04 9-CA ii§-4 6/.1( D13 4°- tc. sefo ri Ls't,4 (.6 !a ,� �1 � t✓. ./p/tct,6 i4 • Ccni iv\ I AN\ I B E AC H CITY OF -ML.kII BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COPANY NAME (PLEASE PRLNT) • PHONE# FAX# • E-MAIL ADDRESS. /974 / P't C., IR TJLLi , , A ,■ A ; \ u Cib S‘J. .1/kJ-% SC.■ 51. CINAV, SkI1W.I-V-1, '17('-x----4)• e • rf RAI 36/ 5/tivi .56) 33/ LforeYon 11A,DiviSolei Tliicooloil G:a z 4.0 el • • . . _ . • MAt\ABEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAMIE PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PR1 T) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMB 305-673-7000 736-394-4073 vusbel Uonzal ezrciw.miam ibeachtl.Nov ext. 6230 17 C54 CEN T2 AL /,J G f S 44/-S4-8 63ost 4,4J-4-494 J r C c54:9re a . e,,t 73 6 2 (�("- -' PcS(1/-] Z(2 " (3o,-)7"Z r0E 7 / s 2. 7'ate jc,s 0/1 rj ,--Lcort ealfe--ed,6'61-(°"1 j 'T-0 )-e(7-Vi:11)44*. 3c - ,t;-6 3 AI . 0,5D - ' L( .. 62 / C ?J c rl�f .C� ,�,� `i/P\N1 CAALDs 1,te,I-{a /l24.) - io I - liE-41A1`1 b Jekern&AdeF.. -ci/'e •.ovy1 32.Cot • VaAINU) Q./4'F' lAj IS:en t NeZe_ •r‘5 'r.) CU ■nSIACA•0°I. Pleoo,..T.,‘,A r‘NI st arf‘: 4;6•C* eN _� CO - �r: - ;ter_ � e.C.,\�cL \/ell OS `i C(\1-Se 3 c tv1c ILcA "(� 1.C-� SCE)- y t \_1 J 11.' t\AIAM ! BEACH CITY OF MI MI BEACH PRE— PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN—IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENG[NEER[ G SERVICES U SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME CONIPAlNY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MML.ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusheluonzaIez(a'miamibeachtl uov ext. 6?30 c:s-6,-,c.,-d3SJ fro L•t I,,D 9• t- 'e (' t i, / fJ,1 172<�' —bilk Jr��; � ./ 1.1 7'(,[,-�,j. <'-7i 2(5- I L. �:J�e3-(:, / ' i , _ ,. ��� r lam' �Ll ,( �/ i i l_:to �'G ,,/,,,4 t 1(%r/t r(1') 1q 1 / t o'n So 1r 0jc, c-Itll (;`)OS'� - II ) cc . 'G�GC,(5 t4S 11 Cow �- 26.y ,(?(, . ( 17\\ .51k kC 1 ib .± '�lc�t Don\ r -, .., , , , . �_, .loaf BO`•. (,t .. `r `-(b-�L a ._�i.55 :Dr :�c`Utt I�,tA J , , 1,'�n r't,i 1, ► ;(c:oi:S-lt��,,I �'1\S i A4-.CCII Viw4.bt e.fro l .r 2/ .w e u' ,41/7-cLr: _c•M • =® - Fz.65,b> ?-' ILL-4 01V • ►v eV-S.At.ENCo rs 20•JC x,01 01/-1 \.I / r , . L ,,;'e •9..'~,-4.11 rL-.: I _. :1✓)-,•mot! it l i 7-4/ i —A&A-,4 A 24 tit e krt Le,Eptc64 FL 1 -R-o eo 6.) 1..! tVUAiVUBEACH C I'l'Y OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETITG SIGN-IAN SHEET N ME . . -COMPANY ti.AMme. (PLEASE .PRINT)- PIIOtiE# FAY# E=lialL ADDRESS -Mal s AS Per .,5N ,t .rS 3os tasper(0) rioirtikits- Low) u11.?)--DSSG r') -(.,/ f .„, �r1--71/1:17` 17,i i'ems'•`/�+t” �.� C' %f1 I iC �^ �'.I �.y /—. .--_.,,'..;r r ■!✓�=�..-. �'�1�.�...If1.J..W— � !''LL.-I) !!lC—• /2 ' ('/ I '-:/ (1 ~ ! ✓ .:YCr ''(:7)(iirOgr7(/' yz_ri,r ev.(..,-,L0 rc_0,,i r.-9,, is.04 fi I I ' I I i 1 1 1 j 1 I i i i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING * r' SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COI'IPA:vY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzale c miamibeachtl.gov ext. 6230 z Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305) 441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305) 670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305) 446-7799 Ileana Gonzalez Robayna& Associates (305) 823-9316 Natalie Lockwood, Andrews & Newman (305) 444-6454 Tom Decker Woltberg Alvarez & Partners 305) 666-5474 Victor Herrera NV5 (954) 495-2112 Douglass Man CB&I 1 561.361.3148 (j) ' I i erA MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MII- MI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MA.II. ADDRESS Marne Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Legg (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305) 477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-DLAZ & VILLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozy-man I-[aks Engineers, Architects and Land (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting (305) 265-5400 Shawn 1 Stanley Consultants 1 786.762.4115 i I Mark 1 URS Corporation (305) 262-7466 i 1 I 1 i 1 i 1 j i (c-7) 71 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 13, 2014 16 . ... '11" AA F AM I BEAC H ._-,-.._--.. CITY OF ML /II BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITION TAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" -N tiIE ..COMP:- NY N NIL PHONE# F.W (PLEASE PRPiT) '. . ' . .. . '. .: .. -. . E-1 G ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 v�ushelu'onzalez c�irniainibeacl.lt1<Tov� ext. 6230 + ^ ' _c-f__ --, r `v ,,,-r.---/-;1�(.�'Jc.:���: 1 i G`!(�) e>Cr1 I f../.)/v) 'ter --.1(;;;,:.7, C ) -T•J` rteA7-.I _ n X13\.5c Y.,(iL" f-N ;li,,r- ii4C; C-0 _ 76 7( G:� ' i � '- ( -7, OL' t 4Cef-�'bctri` Ur>ccts,.he r n -,-.1�erj,>. : G.�-� / ( s), j F-707E--.Ert P 1--/P t--- . tvf---7— (_.c.,,p...__R Q7/ C,.;,_ -r -- c, ç n<,-f,p j P \-C---_-c_. Q■(,.,-\_ Q 'c'-s) 1 c o \-c•,,J e , co��- 4 ,_ -� c e(5..,y v`.q.,,;, 4 y 4- -b s 1-s t►h` jl-L.L (—LQ r V lA( W A. FL ' / a 1-t, ;--/1 '-(( , i 0 , c__.k A (b c r �,� i t[C y r F� r Ok' ,L. - 30544 c1-24c4 bi-00, -, Lx_ q_e Q n-ke c.cowl /_ rte- a �5��'i I� 1`h p a c L7 6� �r� II CA__ /\AIA1\/\ 1 BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN -AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL.ADDRESS. Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CRIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4(373 vushel,zonzalez(a.m iamibeach fl.caw ext. 6230 C.in ° c!-r/ �"- 3o ,13AA6. /4400/A-4, ,2 - IOJA, 1= /4 . 1 c�.'1 C� - C I P o (t ' a n cCr-� , tic � - �o v -1°7 I �'�� � � � Q YL�I 4 C� Vat/1(154-- 7 t G1191 iwrt vt f 3n" 73eim 'deZ— 1/-�n e'SSei ne tri vc((f 6%- j•cow C UU\eGri 51(20(1,�4 , N\/Lta.loki. eINAve:21-01A kfAikx/'boat c .11v 1°1° M! AMIBEACH • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH •PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-VG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRL T) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalez c miamibeachtl.aov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovtec 352-459-1974 lance(a).i nno vtec.c o m James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahna:kstla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Tom Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkskica wadetrim.corn Jenny Alonso TX. Lin International 305-567-1888 Ext. 4034 Sennv.alonsor c;tvlin.com Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing 561-494-7006 slbol inger-Rterracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 N,ti'illiam.craven( puretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 ipriernagleassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters Associates 407-830-8700 i kemp(bpa-eng.ineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates(c`:,inail.com l• MIAMIBEACH ,-.=---/ CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONEft FAY# E-MAIL ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzuncacphcopr.com Brenda Kimlev-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin L[VS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin c divs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCI Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305) 461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin& Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 i , i I i 1 ! I i i I 1 i ! , { I I , , I I I ! I j i 1 I q 1 V MIAMI B City of Miami Beach, 1 700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 12, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center iDrive.Miami Beach, Florida 33139,w'ew.miomibeachil.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7190 Fox: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.. ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18. 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. - Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez l 305-673-7000; ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely,;) f P o curement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention.Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will.contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 ' YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") OCTOBER 7, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicourchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall - 4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 M [AMI City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION # 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION #2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 1 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2 014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-OASIS" and return the `Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propoi Since ei ; 'f I/ i' / �l %' i ' -f /1/„....6)/ enis Procurement Director • REQUEST FOR QUAUFICATIO\ S ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MAMBEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov . A \ '*i r t�°' . �., r-\ , !1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 ^•.. nsi+e.+ - .;:° .-r 2Z- - RFC, 2014-346-YG 2 MI I A' A` .J.. C! i SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term, with two (2) one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place afterthe selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design I Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services ..� ,::. RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19, 2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado(a,miamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez, CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 2014-346-SR 4 ,V\Iiiii{'I 1 Li krI 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall - 4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence." The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.rnunicode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES.. CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 M chti{,ltd BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011-3747, a five (5) point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14. ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and tiT.-, '6w' ,"`�"` :=... sy. s'-'-3s:'siu*.-.Ye.': ..:.C.. 7.. -srd+,••y;7,.. .., ,p'-..' s+.a'.r:" ..rS` '�+'�F"°.°"T� F ".9�'e"'°4`.«f'-"`r RFC) 2014-346-SR — . 6 BE/\ H twenty (120) calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 j; yir- services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful proposer (s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then 0'd-1-014-346-SR�::�.�?. L.L' ".as.e:.a::�sss�a�.��"a� .r�e+.nr�-aatr�-,^'o,;;.+*z- ...�^.s"�'�'°�'3"^z.:.-.:"�'au�x �'•-- - "°� T-- - 8 B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATIONIWITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2014-346-SR /MIA/Mil BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2014-346-SR _ 10 ` r - SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain, a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. ,pooisa Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects, provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED, ULI,AICP, APA. ;� r-s..•.:.�.�-�..-...a_..._..-,.,.w-eas......__v.x:a-....•.. ,=.v-', -� <.°?. ,:.. --.u.>:.::.zu.t: :...-._w.'r:a._-,.-.-.:.-�- .,..ra..ra,.m:+:.:.-...c:a zF..--.-...assa ...:...r .3._H.,.4r.,a,..,,--:t] RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 1 ,\ B F, ±E ?j ; �f A 11 A s ! d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, provide copies of the following: a. Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Experience& Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://suoplieroortal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2014-346-SR � _.a = ._ � 12 AA[Af 1 `I BI7 'ti..s! 4,„ TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFC) 2014-346-SR 13 i i ii \iii °/1' C Cf1s 3 SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200.2 (Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions; or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s) (using the same criteria). ..,S.}.'.tY.�e p.}'2 yaFf Q`u mi:r al'-[x ht'.Sa�i a tF iv'.i.e.{r C::�niw e��a+na M.-a{xii m um Po±;iU n ts, :al .i.,';;.1<.., •.�.,i.r d �".,^�,Sri.. '`"_v i',r •"cue aE.i_F: Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)firms. --[.,+2��31�R'1�A.c�ie"'7,` l y n`a.i,.��}'���:4r }.'45f^!c'"f-Y• ;S' fury < ._tit^ �„! • > �.nr�� 9 �'�•� x a i a t - '�" ''�c� -.r�tt s ic'r�r��cr - y t r'L'; 7 s ut,,,a" -.1� .,�,jrr• Yt^{ iTOTALAVAIABLESTEP' POINTS,Jry ti 'Ylti r f"Fit 9� ."'�-'f `3 s a. i..- -#w._, s w,•;.«.#!f.l•'...s�. __.n..f.c. f�$y r....c,yo':,....,rig _t1fY:o:=o�.F.t./ ra .., =t ,!n...�r .. .t, Y:,e,r 6_S`_=r .:ki r ...2+t� 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. �<v.ziil✓.��'J`Z, C. y T�asif�'"-Lr, �.v•C.l�!�'.4+•'x'u'$y:'.t grri �,Wi tiRY�3£r}rr ^C S�rtY2 r r k ti`v23, in rQuar�fitative;Gntena-�-� .lTr� Z-� 1�t 0.�� .{��y T{�".�" -1��.� .1 1..� !'4 �'-� Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three(3)years.See Section 4 below. •`�T x��t FNJ tiEk�T J�7;x--1�13ti.4 �1.S�G�1�i~ �l�< <t p r �.:'? 3 i ♦ .- r'�' !�3.�. :.E� r.�. t ,�ti. ,.,..,. �. _, TOTA AVNIABLE.SGER PQI�NTA ��z y ' i i'I _{ ,.�. ?. r _ �..it csrt.. �..:.SKI.� .. .. ,-_ .. �' r �-':, .':: 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 AA /\,AA I BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: " q :- :�Proposer Proposer ';•t Proposer ��-A} ,! 'S C n`• .,.r 43Q .'i-J c 'Y 1 .{..3..• f A:4`...,‘:::;';-;.,!:. axe-..Yi'::',,:a•--.•-.:%:' , '•'C .,;t� :i,„$!:,_:;,- � - Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 r= Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 -. -,Member 1 Rank - v- 1: 3 •. - 2.: Step 1 " `''= Points 79 85 72 - Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member2 ‘..Rank - 1' :2 -;3• Step 1 _! Points 80 74 66 ::-. Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 _,:Member 2 r�� .,Rank w _- -..._ >. . ,.,1:. x..,,;.: -, <.•,..,.s.:;2 , ..:. ,,,-a.;:,....f.3 i - Lowy Aggregate Score't ; z f s,.4JF 'e 3•°- - ',1'7; y -.r r ar- -,- .7 Y tic,,,' „_,,,,. ,,,„,,r^i . ' Yi-: at� :,`, i fP :--t Y ;♦j p 'k ,r>4t 57,r;1 r : ,1 ' r 1f.,, �n� ',r,,,_ ..��-1 kithi:Rankingr. l..,...‘!”.:2,:::-.;:'7?,:,..;.,,,, �-` .'t' 1 P;;::� ,u,:j. ••':.Z.. •, • 1;,,,e3:; *Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A I\ A I /Z-\\ 1\ F ArH v \ i , v - '31/4,„4J Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN - SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 yusbelaonzalez a(�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION. QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. -•s-s ter.^.e r,- .�, .. - �. �. a,_ ..�. ate. e�� �--.,.......s�:s..0 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by any public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. ' - . --• - - - - '!- - -- - --- - - • - - -• - - - . .. _ •.. " --- " benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. same(in a particular year). RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 2 • • •.•••• -e.• ■ • • eee - -- to the living wage requirement. 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners`or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation, either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 201 4 346`(G Appendix A - Page 5 PRO. SER CERTIFICATION' . I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of , 20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: . RFQ 201 4 346 YG Appendix A — Page 6 APPENDIX B c., I , , No • Bid " Form RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 1111 1., , i q e e - .�Vii- ' � +� . j ' , ' - �:;_Y^�--.'7_. ,��Y"��"���d`'�`�w��' "�'i".7`-x+ -.fr-4,,g�.�"'��3 �i r,���i,.� �. �. 5- �; ,� j`�:� ��-..;� )�^.'-C: - st�-..> �-� ttirs i1 to c c . ! 7 r{ ' t y s ;'r t .:: �' i Ul . .1V, �'t t��] �i .; i?,� ,.:, ` �? i s 1.M' *4_ ,)4):,:q- t i1.; Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond _ Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) >.,4�`u '-^. •�.T Il:::.r dY✓4-.. _. .:r. �• _ '9 A z4.5'c w - - .. We do_do not want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: 'vr.it:::�W.1rt'q-.-:;a ial.irsr wr.:.:•�i v. ...a:''-f.s:_..._•ti�f'[•fi�ai "+';n%1vi+ti..r.rruF nra.V,..f:K S!�•.; ...?c'Y,_,tuta:.licM.:;r,.- ..:;r.r.nN•,cYil nv Yq.....1 1'.-` .. -- >:.:ty':.. Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 -°.s�:,�.- . --- - .u:rse°,�.Vii-•-u�:`z3�Git�:•<r�,��--. _ _ `..uk•:io--> 1 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B — Page 1 APPENDIX C A .1\ A I q , 1---\ I Li L. I Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A— Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2. SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes; Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering (Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems; TV; Microwave R FQ 2014-3 46-YG _ .,�.:_ Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages; Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks • Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display, Theater, etc.) • Lighting (Exterior, Streets, Memorials, Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional, Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities (Parks, Marinas, etc.) • Rehabilitation (Buildings, Structures, Facilities, etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering; Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder& Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures Q 2014 346-YG Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping, GIS, and other services: O High Definition Services (HDS) O Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) O Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) O Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) O Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) and Underground Utility_Services O These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.) with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83/90) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling & Facilities • Testing & Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply,Treatment and Distribution • Zoning; Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status (particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. L1...r�E ..x° ' RFQ 2014-346-YG �� u Appendix C APPENDIX D \ A Vll n I'\� � i / ,i � d�� Special Conditions RFQ No . 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 A�pPndiv r. 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D — Page 1 APPENDIX E A / A v A 1\ oiL.rvLA Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 :I\ A /\ f\ A I A r 1 y = INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 —Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V" as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E – Page 1 APPENDIX F t\/\ I Atv'\ 1 B FAC Sample Contract RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXX)O(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:00000 XXXXXXXXX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 9 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H ' BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXX X FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXX OO<XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX�CCXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXXXXXXXXX XX, a Florida XXXXXXXXXXX having its principal office at XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)UCXXXX (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XX)UUCXXXX)UUU<XXXXXXXX X)UUUUU<" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXX)(XX)CXXXXXXXX; XXXXXXXXXXX XXX. 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A" hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D — Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E — Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G— Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H — Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way) the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases, the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any sub-consultants (and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule"D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount u t is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable ' through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of X)O(XXX)0 . 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11 .2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXX With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX)UCXXXXX X:XXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act(Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or the City, its employees or P Y by Y, agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This. document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:latto\AGUR\AGREEMENT FORMSW&E AGREEMENTS■A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: X>UU(XXXXXXX)CU(X Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION • Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $ 0.00 Design Services* $XXXX)(XXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXX)000(X Historic Preservation Board / Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 MIAMIBEACH 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized C on an P"As-Needed-Basis" ._ �, _ _ ARCHITECTURE s� s/.., . . 4 \ _ .„, _ . , .. k \ ...,, ,, -:,,,,,,.. _..._ '''4*''4-4.:1:::::c.:: '. (//; 11% \ , . 4" ' / :.\ , -', . . / . 1 a?. 1 \ I 1 1 '1 \,.,.'",masmira......suni_l_ii...... -' ,i : i ,,,.,_,! 1,',('' , . —1-----7---Trv...„...+� ,� 0- t : Is k all Ill MI M' 1 , II!! II!, 11440 ir'q F yeti T,ly f p 9L a a • 0 201 4-346-YG C! Stantec Design with community in mind Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG INHAT I s INSIDE . . . TAB 1 Cover Letter 1 Appendix A 2 Financial Interests 8 Code of Ethics Policy 9 Firm Overview/Qualifications/Key Personnel 12 Licenses 15 TAB 2 SF-330 17 TAB 3 Approach and Methodology 36 Technological Capabilities 39 Availability 39 54 Stantec Tab 1 MIAMIBEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Stantec 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,Suite 900,Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Phone: (305) 445-2900 Fax: (305) 774-6277 December 1, 2014 Attention: Yusbel Gonzalez, Procurement Reference: Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As Needed Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr. Gonzalez, Another wonderful opportunity to team with the City of Miami Beach and continue our great working relationship through our Architectural capabilities. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. is excited, to once again, work with the City as consultants. We have compiled our statement of qualifications for your review and consideration in the selection of consultants to provide Professional General Architectural Services (Group A). We are confident that through our team's experience and efforts, Miami Beach can truly achieve a great architectural partner. Our team strengths include: Investment in our Local Community. Why? We live here and work here and are personally invested in the projects successes. Experience with Municipalities. We have done the work before. We currently have multiple general services contracts with numerous municipalities similar to Miami Beach. Further, we have worked with the City of Miami Beach in the recent development of the restrooms on Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue and the renovations to Flamingo Park. We know your staff and your City. Right Solutions for the Issues at Hand. This means providing the right solution to meet the current issues and needs of your projects. Our team will look for innovative solutions to get your projects completed on-time and within budget. Stantec works collaboratively matching expertise to client and community goals. Elvira Freire, AIA, LEED AP and Eleane Navarro, Al, LEED AP will serve as Project Managers for these projects, with Javier Salman, AIA, LEED AP, serving as Principal in Charge. They can be contacted at 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 900, Coral Gables, Florida 33134, Phone: (305) 445-2900. We have assigned key personnel from our firm and our sub-consultants to be available at all times to service the City. Elvira and Eleane will act as the points of contact to ensure that the right personnel are assigned to the project and that the right resources are allocated to efficiently complete the work. Please review our summary organization chart for more details of our proposed staff. We have excellent relationships with our subconsultants and are ready to include teams as necessary for these projects. We have worked on many successful projects over the years with Longitude Surveyors, LLC (DBE/MSBE surveying firm), Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. (WBE geotechnical firm), and Rosenberg Gardner Design (CBE/MSBE landscape architecture firm) and they are ready to team with us to complete any City project. We pledge our ongoing commitment to the City of Miami Beach and its constituents and look forward to continuing providing our services to the City of Miami Beach. Respectfully STANTEC ULTING SERVICES INC. Salnian, AIA Print'pal in Charge Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 yusbelgonzalez(c�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. No of Years in Business: 60 No of Years in Business Locally: 30 No of Employees: 14,700 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. (C3TS) FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 10160- 112th Street CITY: Edmonton STATE: Alberta, Canada ZIP CODE: T5K 2L6 TELEPHONE NO.: (780) 917-7000 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAX NO.: (780) 917-7330 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 900 CITY: Coral Gables STATE: ZIP CODE: Florida 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Elvira Freire-Santamaria,AIA ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (305)445-2900 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: elvira.freire-santamaria @stantec.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 11-2167170 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 2 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates N/A 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). N/A 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Attached 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Attached 6. . ■. .. - - . -• ''= - _:..• --- - - • - - - - -- • - - •• ■ -•• ■. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 3 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave _ X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 4 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. 4 Initial tugfrrn Initial tour Initial to Confirm lff'; '{rte∎, Recei et p-;=" Addendum 1 �"'� Addendum 6 Addendum 11 -r„i��wA Addendum 2 4 f Addendum 7 Addendum 12 �/,_� 9 Addendum 3 �arA'4 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 eX0,04 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 o,rj'1 �tjoss_ Addendum 5 r Addendum 10 Addendum 15 iy.tfT rm.tion of addendu . :•.fired,sus• it under separate cover. If i , s . . RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A - Page 4 5 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge, information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 6 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the ` solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications • Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: J.. ler F. S .an,AfA) Principal Si. ure of P;.poser's AuthorjIed Representative: Date: ti December 1, 2014 State of FLORIDA On this It day of b=LCC`t 0 i personally appeared before me Javier Salman who County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the Principal of Stantec , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Befor me: totary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: Zo 15 . GRACE MORALES Notary Public-State of Florida A .•_My Comm.Expires Nov 27,2015 %s• 11li a�� ' Commission#EE 148461 -'FOF f`''' Bonded Through National Notary Assn. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 6 7 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-345-YG FINANCIAL INTERESTS We are a publicly traded entity listed on the New York Stock Exchange(Symbol:STN)and the Toronto Stock Exchange(Symbol:STN).We are required to be financially stable in order to maintain these listings and we are required to adhere to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(SOX)and its Canadian equivalent(C- SOX).Our shares are widely held.Details on share ownership may be obtained from firms like Bloomberg. We are subject to ongoing independent audits that prove our financial stability and credit worthiness. For a complete view of our audited financial statements,visit the Investors section of our web site at www.stantec.com/about-us/investors.html. No individuals with a controlling financial interest have contributed to the campaign for a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 8 it Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Code of Ethics Policy Policy. Stantec conducts business in accordance with high ethical, moral and legal standards,efficiently, in good faith,with due care, and in the best interests of the Company, its employees,shareholders,and other stakeholders. Stantec maintains business practice standards that will earn the respect of everyone with whom the Company conducts business. Practice The following standards are intended to protect the Company's reputation and the quality of its services,as well as to serve the best interests of its clients,employees, shareholders,and other stakeholders. Application The Stantec Code of Ethics applies to all employees and is not intended to be exhaustive. Employees are expected to conduct themselves in the performance of their duties with high ethical, moral,and legal standards. Dealing with Each Other Stantec understands that effective relationships are based on the recognition of the value and worth of each individual and that it is necessary to provide a working climate that is conducive to the success and well-being of all employees. Stantec works to create an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect by being honest,fair,and consistent.Stantec treats all employees fairly and impartially and strives to consistently follow Company policies and practices. Stantec employees listen to one another and foster open and honest communications.Stantec values the opinion of employees, respects their diverse backgrounds,encourages communication among employees,and solicits ideas and suggestions to improve or benefit the Company. Stantec prohibits the use by its employees of any social or other media to post or display comments about coworkers, supervisors,clients or the Company that(non-exhaustively) • Are vulgar,obscene, threatening, intimidating, harassing • Portray the Company or individuals in a negative light • Are a violation of Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy or other workplace policies against discrimination,harassment, and violence Posting or displaying such comments could result in disciplinary action being taken against an employee. Dealing with Shareholders Stantec is committed to protecting and improving shareholder value through the prudent use of Company resources and by observing high standards of legal and ethical conduct in all its business dealings. The Company communicates with shareholders regularly,candidly, and promptly, providing the information necessary to evaluate its management and investment value. Dealing with Clients Serving clients is the essence of Stantec's business. Meeting our clients'expectations and providing good value are the best ways to ensure ongoing demand for our services.Stantec will accurately represent its services and clearly communicate the terms under which these services are provided. Dealing with Subconsultants and Suppliers 9 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Stantec is committed to the fair treatment of subconsultants and suppliers and will select subconsultants and suppliers who provide the best value for the Company and its clients while also respecting its clients'wishes. Proprietary Information Belonging to the Company Employees must maintain the confidentiality of the Company's proprietary information. Examples of proprietary information include strategic plans. client lists, marketing plans, rate tables, and much of the technical information that the Company generates or uses in its business.The disclosure or misuse of Stantec's business information can harm the Company's competitive position and/or reputation and may be a violation of applicable laws. Employees,therefore, must not disclose business information outside the Company unless they are authorized and legal to do so. Proprietary Information of Others Stantec regularly receives proprietary information from its clients, subconsultants,and suppliers.The wrongful possession or use of any proprietary information of any third party is prohibited. Employees may use lawfully obtained proprietary information only for the purpose for which it is provided. If an employee is offered,or comes into. unauthorized possession of third-party proprietary information, the employee must decline the offer and take appropriate steps, if applicable,to return the information. Abiding by the Law Wherever Stantec operates. it will at all times comply with applicable laws and regulations. In acting on behalf of Stantec, no employee shall,at any time,take any action which they know or reasonably should know to be in violation of any a pp licable law or regulation.Any tim e a n employee is uncertain about the application or interpretation of a law or regulation, they should consult their supervisor who,in case of doubt, should seek the opinion of the Company's Risk Management team. Improper Payments No payment will be made by,or improper benefit conferred on behalf of,the Company either directly or indirectly to government officials, political candidates,or officers or employees of clients,subcontractors,suppliers,or competitors that violates applicable laws. Bribes, facilitation payments and trading in influence are strictly prohibited. Employees working outside North America should familiarize themselves with Stantec's policy regarding foreign business practices. Personal Business Personal business should not be conducted during normal working hours.Any/all personal business activities should be confined to after hours or lunch breaks and should be consistent with Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy and Practice. paying particular attention to the Moonlighting without Permission section. Reporting Violations of the Stantec Code of Ethics An employee who becomes aware of a violation of this code,or who believes that a violation may take place in the future, must report the matter. Ordinarily,the report should be made to the employee's immediate supervisor who, in turn,must report it to the Company's general counsel. If the supervisor takes no action or the employee feels that it would be appropriate to report to a person in higher authority, the employee should bring the matter to the attention of the general counsel. Requests for anonymity will be respected to the extent that this does not result in the violation of the rights of another employee. Reporting Violations of the Law In addition to reporting violations of the Company's Code of Ethics, it is Stantec's policy to protect employees against unlawful discrimination or retaliation by their employer as a result of lawfully reporting information regarding,or participating in. investigations that involve corporate fraud or other violations of applicable law by the Company or its employees. For further information,refer to Stantec's Integrity policy. Compliance Responsibilities 10 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Stantec's Code of Ethics is to be strictly followed at all times and under all circumstances. Any violation will subject an employee to disciplinary action up to and including termination. To protect its employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders.the Company has designated its general counsel as the individual who is responsible for administering and overseeing the compliance and reporting process of this code. The general counsel will refer submitted complaints as he or she determines to be appropriate,or as required under the directives of the Stantec Board of Directors, to the chief executive officer,the chief operating officer,the vice president of Human Resources, the chair of the board,or an appropriate committee of the board. Stantec and all of its employees benefit from an atmosphere of good ethical conduct. Employees are encouraged to discuss with their supervisor or regional Human Resources coordinator,or, if they prefer,with the Company's general counsel, any situations of existing or potential noncompliance involving themselves or others. hE:l 1 135,19i Rctcvani Le Gtci. �CicUC"s 8,Cc Rl' u ccti on . Las Sc'GiCiT'CC' • 11 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 20 i 4-346-YG FIRM OVERVIEW __-'v'%''''':%‘.:,-- HL a\ * •S 4- _'‘, \0 ec\ r NiNr-t-E) ,—:: w1 �---o ..,.K— ;-� -.��-i s ``'�WAry ,,. 1 V� r y � c_ F 117J ' ..e.'N. \\. p ' iS()-7't::.... (r • -.V iT 4 - s ,,.„,... ..„„, - , `c-r. ,!"`"------ *''' .' \\ ---r- ',- — - , - \ -4V--<; 1'■a1,).!'. � --�- ' • \V ,, sl Wo c ro Stc n o 1 We're active members of the communities we serve. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. Stantec Consulting Services Inc.(Stantec),founded in 1954,provides professional consulting services in planning,engineering,architecture,interior design,landscape architecture,surveying,environmental sciences,project management,and project economics for infrastructure and facilities projects. Continually striving to balance economic,environmental,and social responsibilities,we are recognized as a world-class leader and innovator in the delivery of sustainable solutions.We support public and private sector clients in a 900 diverse range of markets at every stage,from the initial conceptualization and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. Architectural design staff in over The Stantec community unites more than 13,500 specialists working in over 200 200 locations locations.We collaborate across disciplines and industries to make buildings, infrastructure,and energy and resource projects happen.Our work—professional consulting in planning, engineering,architecture,interior design,landscape architecture,surveying,environmental sciences, project management,and project economics—begins at the intersection of community,creativity,and client relationships. Since 1954,our local strength,knowledge,and relationships,coupled with our world-class expertise, have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients'needs in more creative and personalized ways.With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve,Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe.Stantec trades on the TSX and the NYSE under the symbol STN. QUALIFICATIONS AND CAPABILITIES We create designs that are timeless,intelligent,and sustainable. At Stantec we are passionate about the design quality of the built environment.We create designs that are timeless,intelligent,and sustainable.We work collaboratively,matching knowledge and experience to 12 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFC?2014-3466-YG client and community goals.Our practice extends from macro to micro—from master planning to architectural and interior design—throughout the life cycle of a project. Our team enjoys a reputation for creating high-performance,fiscally responsible,and 1 25 award-winning buildings and interiors. We believe that a successful design not only embraces the surrounding context, Awards our team has but also creates it as an integral part of the overall indoor and outdoor received for projects environment.Our expertise seamlessly combines design of the individual ranging from public components that make up municipal buildings,community centers,public safety engagement to urban buildings,and a wide variety of facilities.Our extensive experience with design. landscape municipal approvals gives us the know-how to successfully navigate projects architecture, and through complex approvals processes,while successfully engaging the many neighborhood planning. stakeholder groups involved in these community projects. The result is a comprehensive solution that"works"physically and is highly responsive to our clients' budget and program objectives,as well as the goals of the individual users and user groups. Our commitment to understanding our clients'needs and providing practical,economical and technically-sound solutions has made us the consultant of choice for several nearby cities in Miami- Dade,Broward and Palm Beach Counties including General Service Contracts with Miami-Dade, Broward,Palm Beach,and St.Lucie Counties, Surfside,Bay Harbor Islands,Coral Gables,North Miami Beach,Miami,Cutler Bay,Palmetto Bay,Doral,Hialeah,Fort Lauderdale,Coral Springs,Town of Palm Beach,Delray Beach,Riviera Beach,Lake Worth CRA,Pompano Beach,Deerfield Beach,and more. We have also worked on continuing service contracts for state agencies such as the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT),Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management and the South Florida Water Management Department. Project Experience Includes: ✓ Miami Beach Restrooms and Concessions,Miami Beach,FL +45 ✓ Flamingo Park Football Field/Concession Building Improvements,Miami Beach,FL Continuing ✓ Town of Surfside Parking Structures Feasibility Study-Streetscape Master services con tracts for Plan,Surfside,FL various public sector ✓ Joe Celestin Youth Community Center&Gymnasium at Claude Pepper Park, agencies throughout North Miami,FL South Florida. ✓ Gibson Park,Miami,FL ✓ Grapeland Park Aquatic Facility,Miami,FL ✓ Palmetto Bay Park,Palmetto Bay,FL ✓ Miracle Mile Streetscape Redevelopment&Conceptual Master Plan,Coral Gables,FL ✓ Doral Police Headquarters Emergency Operations Center&Training Facility,Doral,FL ✓ Coral Gables Museum Garage on Aragon Avenue(Staff Experience),Coral Gables,FL ✓ Martin County Vehicle Maintenance Facility,Martin County,FL ✓ Walker Park Community Center and Library,Hialeah,FL ✓ Crandon Park Master Plan and Improvements,Key Biscayne,FL ✓ Coral Springs Public Safety Training&Technology Facility,Coral Springs,FL ✓ Oakes Road Fire Station,Davie,FL For more detailed key project information,please see our SF-330 included within this proposal. 13 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG KEY PERSONNEL We have assembled a team of very experienced professionals to provide the City of Miami Beach with exceptional service. These individuals will be assigned and available to the City. Javier F. Salman,AIA,has over 29 years of experience with public and private sector projects.His hands-on management style allows for maximum quality and ensures continuous and productive client contact throughout the life of the project.His design and management expertise,coupled with his extensive governmental and institutional experience,ensures a successful relationship with clients.Mr. Salman received his CPTED certification through Florida Atlantic University in 1998,has since served as a lecturer on the subject of CPTED principles as applied to urban and parks design,and is a recognized expert in the field.Additionally,he is a LEED Accredited Professional identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building design to all of his projects. Elvira Freire-Santamaria,AIA,has over 19 years of experience with public and private sector projects.She has served as project manager,project architect,job captain,and architectural designer for both large and small scale projects through the design development stage,construction documents, permitting,and construction administration.Her experience includes new construction,renovation to existing facilities,and interior design for commercial&corporate clients.Her governmental project experience has included many projects for Florida municipalities,working on government buildings, maintenance facilities,parks and recreational facilities,etc.Additionally,she has worked with Florida Department of Transportation,Florida Atlantic University,Florida International University,Miami Dade College,and Miami Dade County Public Schools. Eddie Lamas,AIA is an award-winning Architect,Designer and Project Manager with over 37 years of experience.He is responsible for all phases of projects from master planning,programming and design through construction documentation and administration.Mr.Lamas has led design teams for a wide range of multi-faceted projects including municipal/governmental facilities,parks,commercial, educational and historic renovations.His interpersonal skills,as well as his commitment to service and constant communication with clients and multidisciplinary teams throughout development of each project,have ensured their successful delivery and have garnered Mr.Lamas an impeccable reputation as one of the leading designers in the South Florida area. Eleane Navarro,AI has over 20 years of experience with public and private sector projects.She has served as project manager and architectural designer for both large and small scale projects through the design development stage,construction documents,and permitting,as well as construction administration for various types of projects and clients.She has worked with,Miami-Dade County Public Schools,Florida Department of Transportation,Florida Atlantic University,Miami Dade College,and Florida International University as well as various cities throughout Miami-Dade and Broward Counties. Ne Project Role Current Availability Workload j Javier Salman,AIA,LEED AP Principal in Charge 70% 30% Elvira Freire,AIA,LEED AP Project Manager 20% 80% Eddie Lamas,AIA Senior Project Architect 50% 50% Eleane Navarro,AI,LEED AP Project Manager/Architectural Designer 50% 50% 14 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ ZYI 4-346-YG LICENSES STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ❑ :{ ,l� ❑ BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN {)}•., • • LICENSE NUMBER a'F.: °• AR0014410 '�,,,, 1'` ' The ARCHITECT ''•f� Named below IS LICENSED ❑ • t:05 . Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: FEB 28,2015 SALMAN, JAVIER F 901 PONCE DE LEON BVLD STE 900 41e..‘ CORAL GABLES FL 33134 VIVA FLORIDA 6L. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ''❑ �: ❑ BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN LICENSE NUMBER °-3:3 r 411 r'• AR95213 r•'{4 LIS• . .1 The ARCHITECT -'. -Jo• Named below IS LICENSED ❑ „i Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: FEB 28,2015 FREIRE-SANTAMARIA,ELVIRA 47 SAN SEBASTIAN AVE 11 CORAL GABLES FL 33134 VIVA FLORID-' STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ❑ • • ❑ BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN • er LICENSE NUMBER ; • AR0008276 T }` The ARCHITECT ���1.1.•,o' Named below IS LICENSED El • Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: FEB 28,2015 LAMAS, EDUARDO N 10875 SW 28TH ST MIAMI FL 331652411 VIVA FLORIDA 15 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG LEED CERTIFICATIONS DOCI JDD •=if:i1J 'oo GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Javier F. Salman 11, / LEED®ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL ,,)11 `.),•1•11., )11,1,,,,1,11•., ;No -,•E ICA)),A111.1 ',WW1 ;•••■,. EN%CC1i,)rAL IXED ri1/t— May I s,ao9 ".=4,51/64A- -1 J J JJJ ji GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Etvira Santamaria LEED®ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL \ , LEO R15-11,219 j,J Jill J J III GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Eteane Navarro LEED®ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL „,„„,, 1,:11 11 , C L.) ••• srAr• MO AP 22lun-119 -,0779e447: 16 cStantec Tab 2 MIAMIBEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" ARCHITECT—ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) City of Miami Beach Professional Architectural&Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As-Needed Basis 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER Sept.19,2014 RFQ 2014-346-YG B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Elvira Freire-Santamaria,AIA 5.NAME OF FIRM Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (305)445-2900 (305)774-6277 Elvira.freire-santamaria @stantec.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) Z 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 1 aka w — Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard a. X Suite 900 Professional Architecture Services Coral Gables,Florida 33134 0 CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE C. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM Please see attached on the following page. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 17 STANDARD FORM 330 0 • s2uiping anosaj/;atT3/icoua aauzq` • • • • ° 4- D 1- ,ID . • sjooa$utUuunrns. • • • • co cn • N �, r oL a.I�a • • • • E a c.n v) -- sa Io3`sair onts`sauipriq • • • • , suttee • • • • °— > 4) • a a .a S3100(1. 11131#4^ • • • • 0 salt�.ue aauEUalurE a of a.', o a SaE.iErJ • • • • . . , . . . , _ . . _• _ .... . miluil • aouat adxa s� " 0) o) o a 0''. '0 o j W aI Q-i <4 cd I--1 a e cn a ,� as Z o. a co P-1, cd ti 4.1 W W � � ttO H v; A A ,� . m LU t .—t 41 W -. a N Z a a � 4-, .,-I;d C a) CD :• . a cci (I) 1.1, --1 cti 0 CII N N •� 4.,, ,��'. a '� °". CI)0 0 0 W W= Q �— G � c! °to ce ( , i, a) a o I i. ID' 41 W W '-' W W s a)ri 5— - !, v o < 1 g< v < •a: E T3 U) Z Q • Cfl v. CD .1T4 3-73. C7 ® .a 'S o 62 a 0 CD a 1 d 1 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Javier F.Salman,ALA,LEED AP Principal in Charge/Senior Project Architect 29 22 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) State of Florida Registered Architect No.0014410 Bachelor of Science in Architecture Georgia Tech,1985 State of Georgia Registered Architect No.008258 Master of Arts in Architecture Georgia Tech,1987 State of Alabama Registered Architect No.4060 State of Louisiana Registered Architect No.4537 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park(Phase 1/Phase 2) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011/2014 2012/Ongoing (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge for the architectural design for a 9-acre, $10 million urban park as part of the area renewal and a. community redevelopment district. This Gold LEED Certified project consists of a 6,400 s.f. recreation center, 4,000 s.f. renovated community center, 15,000 s.f.basketball gymnasium,bowling alley, concession area,football and baseball fields and an aquatic center,all of which will be completed in two phases. The development of the park was carefully arranged to meet the program requirements while working within strict space limitations. Taking these limitations into consideration, we worked to develop footprints and a site layout that uses the space available in the most efficient manner. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Joe Celestin Youth Community Center&Gymnasium at Claude Pepper PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Park 2011 2012 North Miami,Florida (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Principal in Charge of the design of this $ 5.5 million multi-purpose youth center which includes classrooms,youth training center,computer labs,and health center.Services also included parking lot drainage,water main,pump station,and general site development. Programmed to be the crown jewel of the City of North Miami's Parks&Recreation Department,this facility will occupy a very highly visible location within the western end of the City. This project received Gold LEED certification. Green design and construction methods are being used throughout the park for environmental benefits. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Police Headquarters Emergency Operations Center&Training Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Doral,Florida 2010 TBD (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge for this project for the design and Design Criteria package development and administration of a proposed $18 million facility. Expanding on the campus approach, our Architecture Dept. developed a design which LEED Certifiable Design which fulfills the pragmatic,aesthetic,and public needs for this facility.Unlike most other current prototypical facilities, 0' this Cat Five rated facility will be visually open and is set to provide an ideal work environment for both the limited publicly accessible areas and staff areas.The preponderance of light and enclosed exterior will serve as a benefit to minimizing stress in the work place and contribute to the efficiency of the department as envisioned by the administration.The typical open areas of the office portions have been allowed to retain open communication and visibility while still providing for individual spaces for each staff member. Innovations include reflectors for maximization of natural light, electronically tinted class for limiting variation of light fatigue; individual control of local environmental controls; heat recovery of mechanical systems for use in domestic hot water;and solar generated power. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Grapeland Park&Aquatic Facility Complex PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge of the architectural design and planning and a 10-acre,$20 million urban park as part of the area renewal d. and airport improvement district. This project took an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex and transformed it into a regional,needs-based park which includes a water theme park and a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such,the design of Grapeland Park,located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood,is able to accommodate both multi-modal transportation access and all required parking. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miracle Mile Streetscape Redevelopment&Conceptual Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Coral Gables,Florida 2010 TBD (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm e. Principal in Charge of this project which will help transform the Coral Gables Downtown area into a vibrant epicenter of the local community. Some of the enhancements include wider sidewalks with more open public space to attract foot traffic, improved urban lighting, tree grates, benches, kiosks, signage, throughways to garages, and upgraded drainage facilities. In creating a more vibrant atmosphere for locals,this Streetscape Project will inherently serve to attract a larger share of Greater Miami's visitors,including the economic impact they generate,to Downtown Coral Gables. 19 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Elvira Freire,ALA,LEED AP Project Manager/Senior Project Architect 19 19 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Architecture State of Florida Registered Architect No.95213 University of Miami,Miami,Florida 1995 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park(Phase 1/Phase 2) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011/2014 2012/Ongoing (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Architect in charge of the architectural design for a 9-acre, $10 million urban park as part of the area renewal and community redevelopment district. This Silver LEED Certified project consists of a 6,400 s.f. recreation center, 4,000 s.f. renovated community center,15,000 s.f.basketball gymnasium,bowling alley,concession area,football and baseball fields and an aquatic center,all of which will be completed in two phases. The development of the park was carefully arranged to meet the program requirements while working within strict space limitations. Taking these limitations into consideration,we worked to develop footprints and a site layout that uses the space available in the most efficient manner. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Uleta Community Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami Beach,Florida 2010 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Architect for the redesign of a five-acre site,Ms.Freire oversees the demolition of two existing structures and two new pools to be constructed into three phases. The project will be complete with a restored gymnasium,children's classes,offices, and pool building with an enclosed glass corridor connecting each space. The site will provide the client with an increased income and educational facility. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Joe Celestin Park Youth Community Center&Gymnasium at Claude PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pepper Park North Miami,Florida 2011 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm c. Construction Project Manager and Project Manager for the design and construction of this$5.5 million multi-purpose youth center which includes classrooms,youth training center,computer labs, and health center.Services also included parking lot drainage, water main, pump station, and general site development. Programmed to be the crown jewel of the City of North Miami's Parks&Recreation Department,this facility will occupy a very highly visible location within the western end of the City. This project is currently in process of Silver LEED certification. Green design and construction methods are being used throughout the park for environmental benefits. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Police Headquarters,EOC and Training Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Doral,Florida 2010 TBD (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm d. Architectural Designer/Project Manager for the needs assessment report and the development of the Design Criteria Package for the proposed$18 million dollar, 40,000 s.f.facility. Expanding on the campus approach,we developed a LEED Certifiable Design which fulfills the pragmatic,aesthetic,and public needs for this facility.Innovations include reflectors for maximization of natural light, electronically tinted class for limiting variation of light fatigue, individual control of local environmental controls,heat recovery of mechanical systems for use in domestic hot water,and solar generated power;all part of our holistic philosophy of design. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Grapeland Park&Aquatic Facility Complex PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager in charge of the architectural design for a 10-acre,$20 million urban park as part of the area renewal and airport improvement district. This project took an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex and transformed it into a regional,needs-based park which includes a water theme park as well as a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such, the design of Grapeland Park,located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood,is able to accommodate both multi-modal transportation access and all required parking. Employing the CPTED principles of clear way-finding,the design for this park allows users of these diverse programs to coexist within this limited site by sharing a clear and intuitive organization. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 20 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Eduardo Lamas,AIA Senior Project Architect/QA-QC 37 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE ANDSPECL4LIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Arts in Architecture,University of Miami,1977 Florida Registered Architect AR0008276 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Institute of Architects,Florida; American Institute of Architects,National; Architectural Clubs of Miami,Founding Member 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Surfside Parking Structures Feasibility Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Surfside,Florida 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Manager/Designer for this project which is intended to addresses the Town's parking requirements both now and in the future. With many of existing businesses forced to rely on publicly provided parking because of the geographic limitations of the downtown,we investigated various parking structure alternatives on three sites identified by the Town for the Town's first parking structure. The challenge of this project is meeting the parking needs of the various constituent groups in a manner that is acceptable both economically and aesthetically to the residents of Surfside. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Surfside Harding Avenue Streetscape Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Surfside,Florida 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE E Check if project performed with current firm b Project Manager/Designer for the beautification of the Town's"Downtown District"that would be the catalyst for its future improvements and business owners encompassing two city blocks from 96th Street to 94th Street. The improvement, consisting of replacing the existing palms with new MedJool Date Palms also included the addition of MedJool Date Palms were no palms existed including up-lighting and seasonal lighting for the new palms, pocket parks (mid-block crossing) and at the street corners. Additional seasonal landscaping was added along with street furnishings and wider green areas while maintaining the existing sidewalk clear path areas. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Joseph Caleb Center New Courthouse Annex/Additions and New PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Parking Garage,Miami,FL _ 2008 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑Check if project performed with current firm c. Services are to identify green building strategies for Miami-Dade County's two-story Courthouse,three-story parking garage and several other uses located at the existing Caleb Center.Mr.Lamas and his Team conducted LEED feasibility report analysis during schematic design, and organized Charette sessions throughout the design process. The new 2-story courthouse has approximately 39,000 SF;the 3-story garage totals 200,000 SF and houses 515 spaces.The project has been registered through the US Green Building Council for LEED certification. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach City Hall/Government Center Complex PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Master Plan,North Miami Beach,Florida 1999 1999 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager/Designer of the Government Center Complex for the City of North Miami Beach encompasses the Design and Renovation of the following facilities:Ronald A.Silver Youth Environment Services/Marjorie and William McDonald Center; Public Services Department Administration Building (City Hall West); North Miami Beach City Hall; and Julius Littman Performing Arts Theater. The implementation of the plan took less than three years from its inception.An overall cost of$7.2 million was the construction cost for the entire complex. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Public Safety Building Renovations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Coral Gables,Florida 2014 On-going (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Senior Architect for this project that consists of a 5-story facility with basement level and connected 5-story public parking e. garage. The exterior walls of the tower are clad with texture brick and stucco. The parking garage exterior is cast-in-place rubbed concrete. The building was originally designed in 1972 with construction completed in 1973. The existing building houses the following City of Coral Gables Departments;Police,Fire,Human Resources,Information Technology and Parking. Additionally, the facility houses the City's Emergency Operations Center which functions as regional center in times of emergency and also the 911 Center. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 21 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Eleane Navarro,AI,LEED AP Project Manager/Architectural Designer 20 18 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services -Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE ANDSPECL4LIZATIOIV) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Architecture LEED Accredited Professional Syracuse University,1994 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Surfside Parking Structures Feasibility Study PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Surfside,Florida 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE d Check if project performed with current firm a. Architectural Designer for this project which is intended to addresses the Town's parking requirements both now and in the future. With many of existing businesses forced to rely on publicly provided parking because of the geographic limitations of the downtown, we investigated various parking structure alternatives on three sites identified by the Town for the Town's first parking structure. The challenge of this project is meeting the parking needs of the various constituent groups in a manner that is acceptable both economically and aesthetically to the residents of Surfside. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flamingo Park Football Field/Concession Building Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm b. The project included the renovations and improvements to the Flamingo Park football field and track with new sports lighting for the field, new scoreboard, artificial turf for the football field, field fencing, and track expansion. The renovations of the bleacher building included full renovations to the existing restrooms,concession and press box,new ADA restroom,ADA ramp and ADA seating section on the concrete bleachers. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pelican Harbor Marina Utilities Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Miami,Florida 2012 Ongoing (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Project Manager for this investigation and study to determine the extent of work needed for the marina improvements,which included investigation of existing utilities and structural evaluation of the piers. The study resulted in the repair,restoration and replacement of pile caps, double tees of the main pier, and minor structural repairs of the other three piers. Project also included utilities replacement of electrical and water on land and in all four piers and the marina fuel dock, and new power pedestals provided for all slips. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Springs Public Safety Training and Technology Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Coral Springs,Florida 2006 2007 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d. Assistant Project Manager for this project on a 3.9 acre site adjacent to the City's Vehicle Maintenance and Public Works Center.The project includes three large apparatus training bays;five training rooms seating 40 persons and four rooms seating 10 people; instructors' officers;library; computer lab, medical technical training facilities; locker/dressing rooms;toilets and other spaces. In addition, there is a multi-story tower; burn pits; vehicle fire facilities; a combined police and fire six-story rescue building;and roadways with multiple fire hydrant connections. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Norwood Oeffler Water Treatment Plant Administration Building PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami Beach,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm e. Architectural Designer/ Project Manager responsible for the architectural design and constructions documents for all the architectural related aspects of the project. The project includes a large scale expansion and improvements to the existing water treatment plant that includes a new two story 14,500 sq ft administrative operations office building, a new 23,000 sq ft nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane technology building,in addition to support facilities such as high service pump rooms,motor control electrical rooms,generator rooms,a new 2,500 sq ft structure to hold sodium hypoclhorite tanks,metering rooms and storage. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 22 STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 1 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park(Phase 1/Phase 2) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011 2012 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER Mark Spanioli,Director,Capital City of Miami Improvements&Transportation (305)416-1224 Program 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The firm provided master planning,civil engineering and architecture design for the complete reconstruction of an existing 9.4 acre park in the historic Overtown section of Miami.The project includes a 6700 SF recreation building and aquatic facility with competitive and recreational swimming components. The project also includes a new artificial turf multipurpose field for baseball and football.The field incorporates covered stadium seating for 1500 patrons. Additional elements include basketball courts, picnic shelters, playground, exercise equipment and parking. We developed a design with LEED Certifiable Design which fulfills the pragmatic,aesthetic,and public needs for this facility.This is the phase 1 of a multi-phase project that will eventually include a gymnasium,bowling alley,and a Community Center,which is currently under construction. This project has received Gold LEED Certification. I ( erg of 4 liumi 4.........141>44— St • areal. o° lle i ..�, %41111r .`' Sepanba22.2014 '114111k 411. fe Javier F Selman,AlA.LEED AP Principal-Architecture Stantec - • w" ",. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulovad,Seise 900 Coral Gables FL 33134-3070 ~ Der Mr.Salmrn — {° ‘'''''''''''-, 1 r ~ phase of Gl�sas Park. how happy vie ere with Staneec's performance at she conviction of the first , ^e• ..'■.r Throughout the low`and challenging deem development you and your Mn were always very ' m meet our weeds and mamas t f .Elvin Encase Saraa> . u a timely and lea effective fashion.Your Reject .iis . manager, adept at handling the many(ad ohm cawBimiug) direaiowa of the design build team. t The results speak for themselves.With the completion of the fret phase of Gibson Park,we received a -nr } ' world class aquatic facility,athletic field and community building which we are all proud of.The impact this project has had on the usage of Overtown and the City of Miami can only be described as truly umsfarmative and positive. y 9 We look forward to your involvement in the curter phase of the project. , 91 Sincerely. . a r 't 1 R Mark Spatial,P. . a ,.e. Director - „tom..,., .r -•s CAPITAL 1MnDweARNTS AND TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM rr� 444 SW.7b Av. .tai rtes/Mosi.rat33 130/UOSl41t~17an/roc 0001 olm•71S3 �� WAN,Main►P.O.d 130700 Mo,Ft 317334700 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 23 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 2 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Restrooms/Concession Stands PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2013 2014 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME C.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Thais Vieira (305)673-7071 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Designed to be located at the heads of the major east/west streets where they intersect the beach, these restroom and concession facilities were designed through the Arts in Public Places Committees requirements to expend funds at these locations. We were extremely proud to have been selected, together with Tran Construction,to provide these much needed facilities on a design-build basis. Each street head(17th 21st,29t 46th,and 64th)will act as location markers and be each visually distinctive from the other in order to promote way-finding along the beach as well as provide a level oft whimsy to what has been traditionally a very dour program. Most recently,construction was just completed on the 53`1 and 6th Street restrooms which were the last of the restrooms to be designed. " iii==-j;-;1 Ir*_� .•Lq: 1,4. r".:111!.‘577 - 7:: r". {1"- .' e:. ''':*1"H 1191 .. ___.' Iii -- ill to k, I I 4 4111111•1111111 1.- .-_ I-i ' ir NM ' ' 1 r, 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. 24 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 3 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Grapeland Sports Complex&Aquatic Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2008 i., Itr T, or:J.,,,,,i.: , _,,,,i 7i.,...y.ir&_:....:::."..:s46„..44.:. 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME C.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER Recreational Design&Construction(RDC) Joseph Cerrone (954)566-3885 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Our company was selected to do the planning and architectural design for a 10-acre,$20 million urban park as part of the area renewal and airport improvement district. This project took an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex and transformed it into a regional,needs-based park which includes a water theme park and a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such,the design of Grapeland Park, located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood, is able to accommodate both multi-modal transportation access and all required parking. - _.` - '`- --40.^' - -- /a�'fe .'. A r �' ,� ^4i. .may s!s r� �~ �. t 1 zi I 1 i t ,:c _ - • .... , ,} ■ , , # I. i #. il„. fri Ip i' p�t �''1•111111111.1 V Ii .. .. Pl -- AIR 4 r, i i i..,q1 . ° ..'`` ;‘,/'fi 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. 25 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 4 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Joe Celestin Park Youth Community Center&Gymnasium at Claude PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pepper Park North Miami,Florida 2011 2012 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER City of North Miami Mr.Jeff Geimer,CPRP (305)895-9842 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) When the community of the City of North Miami sought an innovative and prestigious multi-purpose youth center,it teamed with Stantec for trend-setting results. Our design for the new center is distinguished by angled roofs and a large-scale mural on the outside wall entitled"I Dream to See",the City's first Art in Public Places project. Inspired by community feedback, all the amenities provided by the center were chosen by the residents based on what they felt was lacking in their neighborhood. The 20,000-sq-ft recreation center includes indoor and outdoor basketball and tennis courts, a dance/aerobics studio, weight training area, meeting and party room with seating for 200, teen lounge, day-care center,computer room with 12 stations,art room,and health center.A patio outside the building has a water spray play area for children. Sustainable design and construction methods were used throughout the park for environmental benefits. We applied an efficient lighting strategy to reduce energy costs by integrating natural and artificial lighting sources with occupancy sensors. We specified recycled content materials and those with a cradle to cradle certification such as the roof and metal cladding. We o \. btained water efficiency credits t -..,-..:-.,_:-_ :.. :- including the Innovative Design Credit by reducing the potable is water use in the building and '" irrigation via design of a cistern i ' ' „ , and collection of rainwater. As a ---' result of these and other '! ° � ,, sustainable design features this , et 1 project achieved a LEED® Gold Certification. - 4 • 4, ^.”.i r ' w . I el 1 x t 1 *.—\ 4 *�, .e c[«atas sear. I 7 ` _ i'i, 4:„ , . i t?,,,, , , - _1# !' .F . 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE C. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 26 STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 5 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Martin County Emergency Services Vehicle Maintenance&Storage PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Facility Stuart,Florida 2007 2009 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER Clifford Appe,Bureau Chief Martin County Fire Rescue Administration Communication&Facilities (772)288-5710 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The firm was selected by Martin County for the development of design criteria for the design/build of the first phase of the county's ultimate vehicle maintenance facility. Incorporating the latest in servicing technology,including portable hydraulic lifts,overhead cranes,and prefabricated rack storage,this facility will be the definitive state-of-the-art facility in South Florida. We are responsible for both the first phase 20,000 s.f. design criteria package and the 60,000 s.f master planning, including environmental assessment through South Florida Water Management District of this facility. 6 $ ;: ,,�, �_ f oa � I _ 1 e+- I 4i A, Y gg 88 71 00111°11111111111 ` i 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. 27 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 6 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Meta Community Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami Beach,Florida 2010 2011 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER Recreational Design&Construction(RDC) Joseph Cerrone (954)566-3882 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) This project included the redesign of a five-acre site.We oversaw the demolition of two existing structures and two new pools to be constructed into three phases.The project was completed with a restored gymnasium/community center,children's classes, offices,and pool building with an enclosed glass corridor connecting each space.The updated site provides the client with an increased income and educational facility. 05t, \ - p :14_, ..„ „, , . \ . „,,,,, _ ,_. , ......„,_,,,,..,. .... _ ,.... ..,. r , 0 , . ‘,...... II. :UM . , __ . cr4, ! •• i 1111111111111 1 I I I I;1‘ , . '- __ r . _ _,.,IUIIIIIIMMIII"-*Ml•42- -_-_ 3 .r . Y 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 28 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) 1 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified. Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 7 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami GSA Fleet Truck Wash Facility Upgrade PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2008 2009 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER City of Miami Marcel Douge(now at MDCPS) (305)995-4270 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Our firm was selected by the City of Miami to provide architectural, = civil,structure,mechanical,electrical and plumbing services for this '-. - project which involved the design and construction of an automatic ' touch-less truck/vehicle wash with water reclamation system to lit , clean the City of Miami's fleet of vehicles(front,roof,rear,both sides ,. and chassis in drive-thru mode).A 90%recycled water system was installed.Cleaning of the existing oil and diesel fuel contamination, P.' r • and on-site engine cleaning was prohibited to prevent further site contamination. f °o- T ,., 1 ,...... *a , 1 r _ . r., e M zr ..*Mires *. x �a M UN N s. GAu 24th St{ ' ' � ' -- _ y.:, ,,E - �j- • ' I '..i °"AWML" i t,UMW 11.1110.0 , JR,..i% r , r r Iii 0 ez jr . i 1*lifrIrtriT4 ,.., 4.1 %.:, - ,,,, ,; ,,P.„: 11,II aif*' N ,.1.1;111. 7 E 110 X i 11 Z.._ MI,., _4. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. Z9 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 8 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Coral Gables Museum Garage on Aragon Avenue(Individual PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Experience) 2003 2006 Coral Gables,Florida 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Liz Ferrer,PE,PM City of Coral Gables Alberto Delgado,Former Public (305)460-5031/(305)342-6392 Works Director 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) Mr. Lamas was Architect of Record for this 8-story parking garage that would support more than 633 spaces, and provide for retail space along the ground floor on an adjacent street.An important challenge was to ensure that the design followed strict guidelines calling for a Mediterranean-style architecture characteristic of the city of Coral Gables.Designers created a 12,000 SF retail liner on the ground floor of the project highlighted a space specifically planned for a local theatre.The theatre presented a particular challenge since the garage had to be sound insulated.A pedestrian promenade contributes to the continued revitalization of the area of Miracle Mile in the heart of Coral Gables. M - Ai,'" pp i 0 s $ ' /1 I I P .." .,,, li. '�^ -^ :r.* ' . , -4 SO f ,,,,..- ,„ II ri 4 . i i I a .... 0..... a a w s n i -Y'`+. yam,.,, C..---. gr, Q 0 .,„, ,i • I a.r! . , ., N` ��„, .,.../.. :: ',,,,'. 'i ,. ---„,.. �. ,i., ..., ^ ii,....._, s j�"1 , _ MUS GE 1........s _..... t ---- -.... 01.4wit. . '' ..... • \\., \ —* ` irr 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Eddie Lamas Individual Experience Coral Gables,Florida Project Manager/Designer (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 30 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 9 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Oakes Road Fire/Rescue Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Davie,Florida 2006 2007 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER Town of Davie Emilio de Simone (954)797-1085 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The firm provided design services for the Oakes Road Fire/Rescue Station.The two-story,15,000 S.F.Station is located on a 1.3 acre site adjacent to SR-7. The project includes 3 large apparatus bays,offices, day room,kitchen,fitness room and sleeping quarters for the Fire/Rescue personnel. Town of Davie Emergency Call/Dispatch center is also part of this project, which required longer term emergency power&hardened communication links.This station is sited in the eastern/industrial part of the town,and the architecture of the building reflects a more industrial character.The 3-story tower serves as a beacon for the station and its surroundings. .4,-1,4 } -- Ede 5.rt.r1C)I 1 511 - -j' AV40": .' r 1 1i 1 A Wj.\a rj , ..^ • s bi. .. ti► _ _ Av �ir.�i , * ,�' mss " - • A .11 to i 'i I IL_ . _ ,. .1.:„2, *.b. I.: ,i- iii::,.,.„,..1 ."'" ot , '. 0 4111Marl. ' 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. 31 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT KEY NUMBER (Present as many as requested by the agency,or 10 projects if not specified Complete one Section Ffor each project.) 10 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Flamingo Park Football Field/Concession Building Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2012 2014 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Jose Velez (305)673-7071 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The project included the renovations and improvements to the Flamingo Park football field and track with new sports lighting for the field, new scoreboard, artificial turf for the football field, field fencing and track expansion. The renovations of the bleacher building included full renovations to the existing restrooms,concession and press box,new ADA restroom,ADA ramp and ADA seating section on the concrete bleachers. Arc-1 oak ,4444 • f Ea Y _ • .. y a. at,wt Ore i • • '• ----..__1 -_-�_ - :-- 9. • 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Stantec Coral Gables,FL Architect and Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. 32 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) G.KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 27.ROLE IN THIS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL (Fill in"Example Projects Key*section below before completing (From Section E, CONTRACT table.Place"X"under project key number for Block 12) (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 8 9 10 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Javier Salman,AIA Principal in Charge • • • • • • • • • Elvira Freire,ALA,LEED AP Client/Project Manager • • • • • • • Eddie Lamas,AIA Project Architect/QA-QC • • • • • Eleane Navarro,Al,LEED AP Project Manager/ • • • • • • • Architectural Designer 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 Gibson Park(Phase 1/Phase 2) 6 theta Community Center Miami,Florida North Miami Beach,Florida 2 Miami Beach Restrooms/Concession Stands 7 City of Miami GSA Fleet Truck Wash Facility Miami Beach,Florida Upgrade,Miami,Florida Grapeland Sports Complex&Aquatic Facility Coral Gables Museum Garage on Aragon Avenue 3 8 Coral Gables,Florida Coral Gables,Florida Joe Celestin Park Youth Community Center& 4 Gymnasium at Claude Pepper Park, 9 Oakes Road Fire/Rescue Station North Miami,Florida Davie,Florida 5 Martin County Emergency Services Vehicle 10 Flamingo Park Football Field/Concession Building Maintenance&Storage Facility,Stuart,Florida Improvements,Miami Beach,Florida AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 33 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. As the City embarks upon the selection of firms to provide professional architecture services,Stantec Consulting Services Inc. would like toe express our sincere desire to serve the City of Miami Beach in this important role.Our XP tY P multi-talented project team includes those committed professionals who have successfully worked with many municipalities to provide various services in the design and construction of municipal buildings,community centers,public safety buildings,and a wide variety of facilities. Our local strength,knowledge,and relationships,coupled with our world-class expertise,have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients'needs in more creative and personalized ways.With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve,Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe. TEAMWORK As to staffing requirements,Stantec has an adequate number of professional architects on staff to service your projects.We offer over 180 employees at our five South Florida offices combined.It is our policy to assign key personnel to specific clients and projects and leave them in those positions to provide better continuity and proper lines of communication. Stantec is prepared to commit personnel as needed for these projects throughout all our offices starting at the top with our assignment of Elvira Freire-Santamaria,AIA as Project Manager.She is extremely familiar with the City,having worked on the recent Miami Beach Restrooms&Concession Stands project. She will bring the full resources of the firm to bear on all assignments to ensure that the project is adequately staffed with quality personnel.We are currently completing many assignments for nearby clients and are ready to service the City in whatever assignments are required. Stantec's staff prides themselves on teamwork.A significant factor in our firm's success is the ability of our professionals from all disciplines and all offices to form a cohesive unit and work together.On many occasions, working together has resulted in a professional from one office traveling to another office to interact directly with other members of the project team.This approach has been applied very successfully.Stantec routinely uses this approach,and vigorously promotes work sharing among our offices.With this teamwork approach,we seek to partner with our clients,understand their concerns and stay in touch with their needs,and respond and deliver accordingly. This partnering philosophy provides open avenues for communication,streamlines schedules,provides efficiency in design by clearly defining expectations,establishes trust through strong working relationships, and ensures that we deliver the quality professional services we seek to provide. QA/QC Stantec also has an aggressive quality control program,which is similar in nature to the plan currently implemented by the Florida Department of Transportation.However,we have modified and improved the plan to the point where we are pleased to hold one of the highest design ratings of any firm in the State of Florida.The performance rating is based on grades given for design with emphasis on percent complete versus schedule,errors and omissions,changes,overruns,accuracy of cost estimates,and actual field changes during construction. Without a proper quality control plan,this degree of thoroughness could not be attained. COMMITMENT We are committed to providing quality and cost-effective engineering to the City of Miami Beach.To accomplish this objective,our management and quality plan considers your needs,integrates process with goal,and provides a written and clearly defined path for successful project completion. Thank you for your consideration. I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNA r' 32.DATE .rI' December 1,2014 33. r ANIII TITLE Javi, F.Salman,AIA,Principal 34 , L SOLICITATION NUMBER(Z'any) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ#2014-346-YG PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS of a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 1954 07-871-9511 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,Suite 900 TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Coral Gables Florida 33134 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE N/A Elvira Freire-Santamaria,AIA,Project Manager 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block2a is a branch office) 6a.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS Elvira.freire- Stantec Consulting S ervices,Inc. (305)445-2900 santamaria()stantec.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Sallnan,PA(C3TS) 1988 19-235-1757 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a. c.Revenue Code b.Discipline b.Experience (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Probe Index Number Code (see below) 02 Administrative 2099 4 A06 Airports;Terminals and Hangars 8 06 Architect 595 4 B02 Bridges 8 08 CADD Technician 494 12 C10 Commercial Buildings 9 12 Civil Engineer 618 7 C16 Construction Surveying 8 13 Communications Engineer 3 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 9 14 Computer Programmer 210 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 7 15 Construction Inspector 36 3 E09 Environmental Impact Studies,Assess.or Statements 9 16 Construction Manager 160 2 Ell Environmental Planning 8 21 Electrical Engineer 406 1 E12 Environmental Remediation 10 23 Environmental Engineer 582 2 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 10 24 Environmental Scientist 874 7 I06 Irrigation;Drainage 6 30 Geologist 191 L03 Landscape Architecture 8 38 Land Surveyor 367 R03 Railroad;Rapid Transit 9 39 Landscape Architect 164 R11 Rivers;Canals;Waterways;Flood Control 5 42 Mechanical Engineer 459 2 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment and Disposal 9 43 Mining Engineer 68 S10 Surveying;Platting;Mapping;Flood Plain Studies 8 48 Project Manager 359 5 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 7 57 Structural Engineer 346 5 TO3 Traffic and Transportation Engineering 10 58 Technician/Analyst 1860 5 T04 Topographic Surveying and Mapping 6 60 Transportation Engineer 508 12 W02 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 8 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 10 Other Employees 2501 29 Total 12900 100 1L ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS L Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 8 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 10 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNA b.DATE �!r December 1,2014 .4trAND1_t . JJ el.-.■7 `a]man,AIA,LEED AP,Principal AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 35 STANDARD FORM 330 Stantec Tab 3 MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" Design vei l corn unity in mind Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFC)201 4-346-YG APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Technical Approach Stantec's approach to projects always starts with our published project management plan which details the personnel,schedule,budget,lines of communication and milestone targets needed to insure a successful completion to any project. This plan is submitted to the client at the Notice to Proceed and can be used as a measuring stick for performance throughout the design, permitting and construction process. The plan outlines the lines of communication and principal point of contact, and includes a production schedule, critical path items, a list of responsible individuals,a list of required permits,and a narrative outlining the We create process by which the design work shall be completed. Upon the Notice to Proceed, places that h e l p Stantec shall provide the necessary background and base work to start the design communities process. This initial document assists Stantec early on in establishing and thrive maintaining the projected schedule by the entire team. The first step in performing work would involve familiarization and data gathering of the site and scope,what we call the due diligence phase. This would include preparation of a photographic record, surveying,geotechnical testing,collection of utility as-builts,collection of previous studies or plans and review of applicable ordinances and resolutions, as well as permitting planning. The permitting planning portion allows us to plan which permitting agency will need to be contacted and will be reviewing the plans, so that it is not discovered during the ip permitting phase, which may cause a delay in the permitting phase. After the due diligence phase, there would be one or more meetings with key staff to discuss project vision, scope and goals. This is best done in combination with walk-through of the project area to clearly understand the issues and challenges. Our inventive and The design team leaders will then conduct one or more in-house brainstorming collaborative sessions to synthesize and analyze the results of the data gathering effort, and approach to begin to formulate a conceptual plan. problem s g helps bring g big ideas to life The next phase after the conceptual plans are accepted is to begin working on the design development drawings and outline specifications for materials and building systems. This phase includes the completion of all systems design in narrative format and preliminary engineering for coordination prior to construction documents. Another essential item during design development phase is to resolve the scope with the budget and receive client approval on the resolution. Once the design development drawings are completed and approved by the City,the project moves into Construction Documents and Specifications.This phase involves the entire design team and all of its members. There will be a series of milestone submittals, including 50%, 90% and 100% design submittals. Each submittal will include an updated construction cost estimate. The total duration of this phase including 50%, 90% and 100% submittals can vary greatly, and depends primarily on the review process. After each submittal, simultaneously with the City reviews, Stantec will perform its own in- house peer review along with our established Quality Control/ Quality Assurance (QA/QC) program. This implemented program enables us to provide project drawings within schedule, at budget cost and with high quality and reliability. Bidding and Negotiation is the next stage of the project. The design team will prepare a full bid package including front end documents,bid forms,contract,specifications and construction plans. After a pre- bid meeting,addenda will be issued as needed. The architects and engineers will be available to answer written questions with written responses to be published to all registered bidders. Once bids are 36 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFC)201 4-346-YG received,we will review the bids,check Contractor references and provide the City with a bid tabulation and recommendation for awards. The final stage of the project is Construction Administration. During this phase,we will participate in the administration of the contractor contract on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City. The services to be provided will vary depending on the level of involvement desired by the City,but typically include pre-construction conferences,shop drawing review,review of RFI's and issuing of clarifications, periodic meetings, site visits and inspections, review of payment requisitions, review of change order requests, final inspection, punch list, as-builts, and contract close-out. The duration of this phase will depend on the extent of the Contractor's contract time. Time Schedule Stantec's planning, programming and design process is structured with particular attention to the schedule and cost control, cost estimates, and time management to guarantee the budget and time allocation for each project performed regardless of the type of project. As part of our control we look at every aspect of a project that may develop into a delay and eliminate it up front with a proactive approach to reduce the overall time involved in what others may consider to be "unforeseen conditions". This includes developing a strong due diligence program in the initial phase of the project. Many of the obstacles that result in time delays revolve around improper or inadequate due diligence with regard to doing your homework including proper project property delineation,historical document review,utility locates and clearances,proper code and design criteria and adequate permit handling. Stantec is experienced in permit and plan production scheduling. As you are aware, all permitting is sometimes difficult to estimate when it comes to scheduling.We shall develop a realistic schedule at the start of the project based on other similar projects so that submittal and milestone dates for plan production can be achieved.Some of the unique approaches developed over the years the firm has existed include pre-permitting and early dry run submittal. Both of these techniques have shown to help reduce the time and potential cost impact of the permitting process. Permitting can also affect the cost estimate from the basis that last minute changes required by agencies can sometimes affect the construction cost estimates and cancel projects altogether. We shall determine all possible impacts early on so that the preliminary cost estimates stay relatively the same as the plans are finalized.A schedule, as part of the project management plan, shall be submitted at the NTP so the City can track production as well as permitting all the way through bid and security of contractor. Schedule Control We understand how critical schedules are.Maintaining a project on schedule begins with understanding the key issues that drive it,and developing contingency plans to control it. The primary purpose of the project schedule is to provide a full accounting of all relevant activities and phases as well as the proper sequencing of project related events such that the project is delivered on schedule. Following are some of the strategies that Stantec uses in order to control the project schedule: ✓ A pro-active Project Management Plan(PMP) ✓ Intensive Due Diligence Phase ✓ Accelerate non-critical path activities to compensate for unforeseen delays later on ✓ Meet with City's staff,public officials,and key community members ahead of time for consensus on key project issues ✓ Clear understanding of Scope of Services ensures schedule is created correctly from the beginning Coordination with Sub-consultants(long-standing relationships enable us to understand their process) ✓ Allow for proper QA/QC time 37 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" PFQ 2014-34 -`,G Cost Control Cost estimating remains a critical part of our design process and cost control methodology. Stantec will develop all costs within the defined goals using constructability analysis, value engineering, budget constraints,and scheduling to achieve those goals. Cost control will be achieved by adopting a predictive cost planning approach. Generally, we produce these cost estimates during the course of the design. During all phases of the project,Stantec will review the construction cost estimates and refine the design to maintain the project on-budget and on-time.One of the factors that have positively influenced our cost estimating abilities is the fact that Stantec has worked on varied projects and has recent cost estimates that can be used as a reference. Stantec also has access to general contractors that have also worked on similar projects that can provide cost estimates that are current and realistic. Working with contractors on a daily basis during design development gives us a different perspective from most design firms and we utilize value engineered cost savings in our everyday design approach. Stantec has extensive experience in helping municipalities achieve positive bottom line results by improving existing processes, identifying new ones, and pinpointing areas for cost savings. We have the management perspective and specialized knowledge needed in order to deliver major cost reductions with improved efficiencies to our clients. Our effective management team reviews the anticipated costs, researches alternative savings methods on a continual basis and monitors progress and quality to reduce your costs. Within scope, without surprises Success with Cost Control Our experience with municipal clients has shown that our success in project cost control is based on early review and estimating of the proposed scope prior to commencement of design work.This allows both the designers and client the opportunity to adjust budgets and/or establish alternatives to protect the base budget for the project.Likewise,we have learned and council our clients to include in their estimates an agreed upon contingency based on other related project experience in order to minimize the impact of unforeseen conditions (i.e. hurricane delays and associated general conditions costs). If success is the ability to meet expectations,then Stantec,with its ongoing approach to cost control before and during design,means to exceed it. Furthermore, Stantec employs various methods during the planning and conceptual phase to accommodate the City's scheduling and budgetary constraints. One approach used in the past is to phase the project so that site clearing and grubbing and building pad construction could take place simultaneously with the preparation of construction drawings and subsequent permitting. This substantially shortened the overall duration of construction for the project. Another successful strategy used by the firm is to design a building that would allow for a future program that could not be accommodated within the current budget. The project was constructed in a manner which will easily provide for future expansion as desired by City. Another approach is to design the project in phases using alternates,thereby allowing the City to"buy out"the alternates as funds become available. These are just a few examples of the "outside of the box" creative thinking that Stantec is proud to contribute to the design process. We believe that the STANTEC TEAM has extensive experience and knowledge in planning and designing. We are confident that we can successfully fulfill and execute the requirements of this project and provide the City with an outstanding project. 38 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFC 2:14-346-YG TECHNOLOGY AND AVAILABILITY Special Equipment and Abilities The following is a list of specialized equipment and software that we have available: ✓ 160 Desktop Computer Equipment - ✓ Underwater Digital Camera Customized and designed for Engineering ✓ Portable GPS units by Dell. Mobile-computer equipment with ✓ Company vehicles wireless and Bluetooth capabilities. ✓ Cellular telephones with remotely ✓ Microsoft Office Suite synchronization with exchange services, ✓ AutoCAD 3D etc. ✓ Microstation ✓ Project specific FTP sites, password- ✓ GeoPack protected, limited access or public access ✓ ICPR sites, read-only or read/comment, and ✓ EaglePoint contributory social networks or blogs. ✓ Primavera Project Planner & Microsoft ✓ Full range of selected Adobe Creative Suite Project for marketing and public relations segment ✓ MathCAD and AutoTurn ✓ Corporate wide remote solutions ✓ WaterCAD, WaterGEMS, SewerCAD, and availability - Included Virtual Private HAMMER software for steady-state, real- Network for almost 50% of time and transient pipe analyses computers/users, OWA (Outlook Web ✓ ESRI GIS Software Arc Info,ArcView,ARC Access)for remotely access, MAP ✓ Full colors plotters,copiers,printers,faxes, ✓ HEC RAS scanners ✓ Digital Cameras In addition, our staff includes architects and graphic artists who develop scale models of buildings or facilities to help our Clients and the public to view how a project will look once completed. Our in-house Public Relations department creates renderings and exhibits of proposed facilities, charts of data in support of projects, and computer generated animations. The latter are particularly useful when demonstrating several phases of a project, as it progresses from start to finish, but is also useful in visualizing current as well as future conditions. 1 Available Staff Level I Availability i Total Potential 1 Staff Utilization �/ ���/ 80% 1— AVAIL -B I L■T LEVEL 60% Active Projects I Overhead,incl. non-billable projects 40% 20% 1 1 r- i Authorization Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-1S Sep-1S Active Projects _._.3ffending Auth. Overhead Total __ Available Demand Staff `� Stantec MIAMIBEACH 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized C on an . "As-Needed-Basis" , CIVIL ENGINEERING , -1 — [---------- ---T----- .-- --+: �`� �` .,1 �'-..._ - ;— ...'!�-- .. .._`fir` : • 1 ..,�`.._!afi•"` _.._ ' r--.";;;; �... ♦ ,_ -�r�.wr. I f ,,. q=4,. •,. !I $L �J' 1 - — •��'_.��� .mow ___•- . "' I.1 __,it � .. I 7 / t LAM , - _ x , a: Ilk "it R 0 P B ..._ . .. . ...:,...,.._. ..„...,..„,,,..,,, ...„ .._ . ..._. .., .. .. . . ,• . _ RFQ I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG vvHAT s INSIDE • • • TAB 1 Cover Letter 1 Appendix A 2 Financial Interests 8 Code of Ethics Policy 9 Firm Overview/Qualifications/Key Personnel 12 Licenses 17 TAB 2 SF - 330 23 TAB 3 Approach and Methodology 58 Technological Capabilities 63 Availability 63 Stantec Tao MIAMIBEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 20]4 346-YG (5) Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Stantec 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,Suite 900, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Phone: (305) 445-2900 Fax: (305) 774-6277 December 1,2014 Attention: Alex Denis,Director of Procurement,City of Miami Beach Reference: Group B-Engineering (Civil) Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As- Needed-Basis-RFQ 2014-346-YG Dear Mr.Denis, Excitement....That's what we feel about this opportunity. Having worked with the City of Miami Beach and with extensive experience in South Florida,our Team's staff stands ready to continue our strong relationship with the City. As you read through our submission,you will gain an understanding of how Stantec Consulting Services Inc.is uniquely qualified to successfully continue to service the City. We are pleased to submit the attached qualifications package for Group B-Engineering with the area of specialization in Civil. We are eager and excited to continue providing the City of Miami Beach with Professional Engineering Services. With over 25 years of local experience,Stantec has excelled at working with local municipalities on the planning and construction of infrastructure improvements and capital projects. We have always placed the highest emphasis on personal commitment of service to our clients,combining strong project management with the correct technical expertise and quality control procedures.We combine the best professionals for the project in delivering the advantages of working with a large firm while still providing the personal service. Jeff Crews,PE,LEED AP,will serve as Project Manager and primary contact for this contract,with Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP serving as Principal in Charge. Additionally,we have assigned key personnel from our firm and our sub-consultants to be available at all times to service the City. Jeff will act as the single point of contact to ensure that the right personnel are assigned to each project and that the right resources are allocated to efficiently complete the work. Please review our Project Team Organization Chart for more details of our proposed staff. The projects highlighted in our submittal help to showcase a few key successes of the team.They also help to demonstrate the wide array of services we offer beyond just civil engineering,including structural engineering,environmental engineering,architecture,and public involvement. Working with us as part of our team are Rosenberg Gardner Design,Inc.providing Landscape Architecture Services;Longitude Surveyors,LLC,providing Surveying Services,and Wingerter Laboratories,Inc.,providing Geotechnical Engineering Services. With over 15 years of relationships with each of these sub-consultants,we are certain this team will exceed the City's expectations. With this expertise,we are confident that we are the best team for this contract. We appreciate the opportunity to express our sincere interest in being of service to the City of Miami Beach,and we look forward to continuing our rewarding relationship. We will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have. Feel free to call on us at(305)445-2900. Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. cc-iv:_Qaleyee Ramon Castella,P.E.,LEED AP,Vice President Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext. 6230 vusbelgonzalez a(�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. No of Years in Business: 60 No of Years in Business Locally: 30 No of Employees: 14,700 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. (C3TS) FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 10160- 112th Street CITY: Edmonton STATE: Alberta, Canada ZIP CODE: T5K 2L6 TELEPHONE NO.: (780) 917-7000 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAX NO.: (780)917-7330 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 900 CITY: Coral Gables STATE: ZIP CODE: Florida 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Sean Compel, P.E. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (305)445-2900 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: sean.compel @stantec.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 11-2167170 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 2 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. N/A SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). N/A 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Attached 5. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Attached 6. - - . -- - - -• ''= - •- --• --- - -- - • - - .• -- - • ••- - • --- "•fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 3 • _ - -- 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides f or Fir m Prov i des for Firm does n not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 3 4 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm -cei.t Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 /Pi Addendum 6 Addendum 4dlek. Addendum 2 4 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 '` Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Olh Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 -, Addendum 5 Addendum 10 _ Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 4 5 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 5 6 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Re•uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Ramon Castella, P.E. Vice President Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: d‹ ..c:?9,51.0e(i(• December 1, 2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this � day of 1---C . ,20 6-personally appeared before meRamon Castello who County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the Vice President of Stantec , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: RThe -)1\ — , Natary Public for the State of Florida `NW Commission Expires: \ —. i —2 G t S . •""r p GRACE MORALES ;'a°111 e,: Notary Public-State of Florida • •_My Comm.Expires Nov 27.2015 o Commission#EE 148461 .''FO,`;`'` Bonded Through National Notary Assn. _ RFQ 201 4-346-YG Appendix A– Page 6 7 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" PFQ 2O 4-346-YG FINANCIAL INTERESTS We are a publicly traded entity listed on the New York Stock Exchange(Symbol:STN)and the Toronto Stock Exchange(Symbol:STN).We are required to be financially stable in order to maintain these listings and we are required to adhere to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(SOX)and its Canadian equivalent(C- SOX).Our shares are widely held.Details on share ownership may be obtained from firms like Bloomberg. We are subject to ongoing independent audits that prove our financial stability and credit worthiness. For a complete view of our audited financial statements,visit the Investors section of our web site at www.stantec.com/about-us/investors.html. No individuals with a controlling financial interest have contributed to the campaign for a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 8 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Code of Ethics Policy Policy Stantec conducts business in accordance with high ethical, moral and legal standards,efficiently, in good faith,with due care, and in the best interests of the Company,its employees, shareholders,and other stakeholders. Stantec maintains business practice standards that will earn the respect of everyone with whom the Company conducts business. Practice The following standards are intended to protect the Company's reputation and the quality of its services,as well as to serve the best interests of its clients,employees, shareholders,and other stakeholders. Application The Stantec Code of Ethics applies to all employees and is not intended to be exhaustive. Employees are expected to conduct themselves in the performance of their duties with high ethical, moral,and legal standards. Dealing with Each Other Stantec understands that effective relationships are based on the recognition of the value and worth of each individual and that it is necessary to provide a working climate that is conducive to the success and well-being of all employees. Stantec works to create an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect by being honest,fair,and consistent.Stantec treats all employees fairly and impartially and strives to consistently follow Company policies and practices. Stantec employees listen to one another and foster open and honest communications. Stantec values the opinion of employees, respects their diverse backgrounds,encourages communication among employees,and solicits ideas and suggestions to improve or benefit the Company. Stantec prohibits the use by its employees of any social or other media to post or display comments about coworkers, supervisors,clients or the Company that(non-exhaustively) • Are vulgar,obscene,threatening, intimidating, harassing • Portray the Company or individuals in a negative light • Are a violation of Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy or other workplace policies against discrimination, harassment, and violence Posting or displaying such comments could result in disciplinary action being taken against an employee. Dealing with Shareholders Stantec is committed to protecting and improving shareholder value through the prudent use of Company resources and by observing high standards of legal and ethical conduct in all its business dealings.The Company communicates with shareholders regularly,candidly,and promptly, providing the information necessary to evaluate its management and investment value. Dealing with Clients Serving clients is the essence of Stantec's business. Meeting our clients'expectations and providing good value are the best ways to ensure ongoing demand for our services.Stantec will accurately represent its services and clearly communicate the terms under which these services are provided. Dealing with Subconsultants and Suppliers 9 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Stantec is committed to the fair treatment of subconsultants and suppliers and will select subconsultants and suppliers who provide the best value for the Company and its clients while also respecting its clients'wishes. Proprietary Information Belonging to the Company Employees must maintain the confidentiality of the Company's proprietary information. Examples of proprietary information include strategic plans,client lists, marketing plans,rate tables, and much of the technical information that the Company generates or uses in its business.The disclosure or misuse of Stantec's business information can harm the Company's competitive position and/or reputation and may be a violation of applicable laws. Employees, therefore, must not disclose business information outside the Company unless they are authorized and legal to do so. Proprietary Information of Others Stantec regularly receives proprietary information from its clients, subconsultants,and suppliers. The wrongful possession or use of any proprietary information of any third party is prohibited. Employees may use lawfully obtained proprietary information only for the purpose for which it is provided. If an employee is offered,or comes into, unauthorized possession of third-party proprietary information,the employee must decline the offer and take appropriate steps. if applicable,to return the information. Abiding by the Law Wherever Stantec operates, it will at all times comply with applicable laws and regulations. In acting on behalf of Stantec, no employee shall,at any time,take any action which they know or reasonably should know to be in violation of any applicable law or regulation.Any time an employee is uncertain about the application or interpretation of a law or regulation, they should consult their supervisor who,in case of doubt, should seek the opinion of the Company's Risk Management team. Improper Payments No payment will be made by,or improper benefit conferred on behalf of,the Company either directly or indirectly to government officials. political candidates, or officers or employees of clients, subcontractors,suppliers,or competitors that violates applicable laws. Bribes, facilitation payments and trading in influence are strictly prohibited. Employees working outside North America should familiarize themselves with Stantec's policy regarding foreign business practices. Personal Business Personal business should not be conducted during normal working hours.Any/all personal business activities should be confined to after hours or lunch breaks and should be consistent with Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy and Practice. paying particular attention to the Moonlighting without Permission section. Reporting Violations of the Stantec Code of Ethics An employee who becomes aware of a violation of this code,or who believes that a violation may take place in the future, must report the matter. Ordinarily, the report should be made to the employee's immediate supervisor who, in turn,must report it to the Company's general counsel. If the supervisor takes no action or the employee feels that it would be appropriate to report to a person in higher authority, the employee should bring the matter to the attention of the general counsel. Requests for anonymity will be respected to the extent that this does not result in the violation of the rights of another employee. Reporting Violations of the Law In addition to reporting violations of the Company's Code of Ethics, it is Stantec's policy to protect employees against unlawful discrimination or retaliation by their employer as a result of lawfully reporting information regarding,or participating in,investigations that involve corporate fraud or other violations of applicable law by the Company or its employees. For further information, refer to Stantec's Integrity policy. Compliance Responsibilities 10 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Stantec's Code of Ethics is to be strictly followed at all times and under all circumstances.Any violation will subject an employee to disciplinary action up to and including termination. To protect its employees, shareholders,and other stakeholders,the Company has designated its general counsel as the individual who is responsible for administering and overseeing the compliance and reporting process of this code. The general counsel will refer submitted complaints as he or she determines to be appropriate,or as required under the directives of the Stantec Board of Directors,to the chief executive officer,the chief operating officer, the vice president of Human Resources, the chair of the board,or an appropriate committee of the board. Stantec and all of its employees benefit from an atmosphere of good ethical conduct. Employees are encouraged to discuss with their supervisor or regional Human Resources coordinator,or, if they prefer,with the Company's general counsel, any situations of existing or potential noncompliance involving themselves or others. L.Ci='"113 'i?i Rc!cvant to. ;lc( P,,tic .C.;iFiieEls.�'.s' Ccromunicatio s_Lost Updated:Scr..(c'Tlthc: 2 2C i' • 11 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 201 4-346-YG FIRM OVERVIEW * ... ---:-.\- ,,z_ w . , . r « l i i w •[' ' '` niec,, ._,..64,_ ,, ,y.).. ,,c -" ,r, -- . ,'... ,dam , \ c ...- s t \\. - . .... y�'y _ \ \ '' - 1- Y ..,. a -. .. .". ti- i' •'fie ', ..-vii,,, _, . — ;"'b . Wo c re Stantoc We're active members of the communities we serve. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. Stantec Consulting Services Inc.(Stantec),founded in 1954,provides professional consulting services in planning,engineering,architecture,interior design,landscape architecture,surveying,environmental sciences,project management,and project economics for infrastructure and facilities projects. Continually striving to balance economic,environmental,and social responsibilities,we are recognized as a world-class leader and innovator in the , delivery of sustainable solutions.We support public and private sector clients in a +`�1 re 0 diverse range of markets at every stage,from the initial conceptualization and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. Engineers in over v200 locations The Stantec community unites more than 13,500 specialists working in over 200 locations.We collaborate across disciplines and industries to make buildings,infrastructure,and energy and resource projects happen.Our work—professional consulting in planning,engineering,architecture, interior design,landscape architecture,surveying,environmental sciences,project management,and project economics—begins at the intersection of community,creativity,and client relationships. Since 1954,our local strength,knowledge,and relationships,coupled with our world-class expertise, have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients'needs in more creative and personalized ways.With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve,Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe.Stantec trades on the TSX and the NYSE under the symbol STN. QUALIFICATIONS AND CAPABILITIES We create designs that are timeless,intelligent,and sustainable. At Stantec we are passionate about the design quality of the built environment.We create designs that are timeless,intelligent,and sustainable.We work collaboratively,matching knowledge and experience to client and community goals.Our practice extends from macro to micro—from master planning to 12 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 201 4-34&YG architectural and interior design—throughout the life cycle of a project. Our team enjoys a reputation for creating high-performance,fiscally responsible,and award-winning buildings and interiors. We believe that a successful design not only embraces the surrounding context, 1 25 but also creates it as an integral part of the overall indoor and outdoor environment.Our expertise seamlessly combines design of the individual Awards our team has components that make up municipal buildings,community centers,public r eceived for projects safety buildings,and a wide variety of facilities.Our extensive experience with ranging from public municipal approvals gives us the know-how to successfully navigate projects engagement to urban through complex approvals processes,while successfully engaging the many design, landscape stakeholder groups involved in these community projects. architecture, and neighborhood planning. The result is a comprehensive solution that"works"physically and is highly responsive to our clients'budget and program objectives,as well as the goals of the individual users and user groups. Our commitment to understanding our clients'needs and providing practical,economical and technically-sound solutions has made us the consultant of choice for several nearby cities in Miami- Dade,Broward and Palm Beach Counties including General Service Contracts with Miami-Dade, Broward,Palm Beach,and St.Lucie Counties, Surfside,Bay Harbor Islands,Coral Gables,North Miami Beach,Miami,Cutler Bay,Palmetto Bay,Doral,Hialeah,Fort Lauderdale,Coral Springs,Town of Palm Beach,Delray Beach,Riviera Beach,Lake Worth CRA,Pompano Beach,Deerfield Beach,and more. We have also worked on continuing service contracts for state agencies such as the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT),Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management and the South Florida Water Management Department. Project Experience Includes: ✓ Miami Beach Design Criteria for Sunset Islands 3&4(Palm&Hibiscus 4..45 Islands),Miami Beach,FL ✓ Town of Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program,Golden Beach,FL Continuing ✓ Old Cutler Road Roadway Improvements,Cutler Bay,FL services contracts for ✓ Zones 1&4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement and Zones 2&3 various public sector Reclaimed Water&Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer,Key Biscayne,FL agencies throughout ✓ Florida International University Central Utilities LS-1 Rehabilitation,Miami, South Florida. FL ✓ Village of Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and System Design,Pinecrest,FL ✓ Gibson Park(Phases 1&2),Miami,FL ✓ Grapeland Park Aquatic Facility,Miami,FL ✓ Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvement,Miami,FL ✓ Village-wide Traffic Calming Study and Master Plan,Key Biscayne,FL For more detailed key project information,please see our SF-330 included within this proposal. KEY PERSONNEL We have assembled a team of very experienced professionals to provide the City of Miami Beach with exceptional service. These individuals will be assigned and available to the City. Ramon Castella,PE, LEED AP,(Principal in Charge) has over 30 years of expertise in public and private infrastructure projects throughout Florida and the Caribbean.His engineering experience on these projects includes programming,planning,analysis,design,preparation of construction documents, 13 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG construction administration and inspection and commissioning.His public works infrastructure project types include drainage,flood control,coastal construction,water and sewer systems,roads and bridges, public facilities,parks,project budgeting and grants acquisition. Terrance N. Glunt,PE,LEED AP,(QA/QC Officer)has over 37 years of experience in the management and administration of engineering divisions responsible for all aspects of design and construction of government and agency related facilities including marina and boating access facilities, recreation complexes,urban and Interstate roadways and bridges,utility corridors,municipal public works and administration facilities,nuclear power plants,landfills and aviation facilities throughout Florida and the United States.His specific experience includes engineering design and coordination of multiple projects,construction engineering and inspection,quality control/constructability review, rigid and flexible pavement design and analysis,hydrologic evaluations,geotechnical and environmental studies,DRI and PD&E involvement,environmental and drainage permitting,preparation of grant applications and coordination of numerous miscellaneous civil and structural contracts with State, County and Municipal entities. Jeffrey S. Crews,PE,LEED AP, (Project Manager)with over 27 years of experience,has been Design Engineer,Project Manager,and Engineer of Record on numerous projects in the fields of structural and civil engineering.Mr.Crews'experience has included the preparation of utility relocation plans,drainage analysis,development of traffic control,and stormwater pollution prevention plans.Mr. Crews also has extensive design,construction inspection,and administration experience in all types of building structures. Sean Compel,PE,LEED AP, (Construction Manager) has over 12 years of experience in the planning,design,permitting and construction of civil engineering and site development projects.He has served as project construction administrator and project engineer for various roadway,drainage,water, sewer,underground electrical,and industrial projects.Clients include municipalities,state agencies, educational facilities,and private businesses.His experience in construction services has allowed him to effectively deliver projects satisfying all owner requirements.Responsibilities during construction include permitting,review of scheduling,and overall cost analysis. Carlos Herdocia,PE,LEED AP, (Senior Project Engineer) has over 26 years of experience and has been Project Manager and Senior Design Engineer on various roadway and drainage projects for municipalities in Florida.He has extensive experience in developing residential,commercial and highway roadway and drainage plans.This experience includes traffic calming,resurfacing and reconstruction plans,drainage design studies and reports,maintenance of traffic,signalization,lighting and signing and marking plans. Dave Clarke,PE,CFM, (Senior Project Engineer) has over 12 years of experience on numerous public infrastructure projects for state agencies,counties and municipalities in South Florida.His experience includes the design,permitting and construction inspections for multiple water distribution mains and sanitary sewer force mains.He has extensive permitting experience with many of the regulatory agencies including the Department of Environmental Resources Management(DERM), Florida Department of Transportation,South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD), Department of Environmental Protection,Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department, Department of Health,and Miami-Dade County Public Works Department.Mr.Clarke also has experience as a project engineer on pump stations,storm drainage,sanitary sewers,Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Studies(SSES)and Sanitary Sewer Repair and Rehabilitation(SSRR)projects. Rodrigo Rodriguez,PE, (Senior Project Engineer) has over 41 years of professional responsibility in infrastructure planning,design,construction,and operation for a wide-range of capital projects in 14 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed-Basis" RFC)2014-346--YG civil,sanitary,and environmental engineering fields for municipal and other public agencies and for private industry and developers.His experience includes that as Director of the North Miami Beach Public Utilities Department(Water&Sewer)serving over 160,000 residents. Marlon Medina,PE, CFM, (Project Engineer) has over 6 years of expertise in the design of Civil Engineering systems including drainage,paving and utilities for large scale projects.His clients have included municipalities,state agencies,educational facilities,and private businesses throughout Florida. Mustafa Albassam,PE,LEED AP, (Project Engineer) has over 9 years of expertise in the design of Civil Engineering systems including drainage,paving and utilities for large scale projects.He has also worked on numerous Design-Build projects and has worked with many municipalities and governmental agencies in South Florida. Earl Henry,EI, (Project Engineer Intern) has over 14 years of experience in Civil and Environmental Engineering projects.He has assisted Project Engineers with the management and administration of engineering projects including responsibility for aspects of the design and construction of government and municipal facilities and recreation complexes.Mr.Henry's responsibilities include the planning,design,on-site inspections and field surveying operations for various types of projects. Danilo Caicedo,EI, (Engineer Intern/Senior Inspector) has over 24 years of experience in all phases of construction and inspections.During this time he has built multi-million dollar projects from initial to final phase(commercial developments to custom single family housing),has carried out daily on-site inspections and supervision,and maintained excellent communication skills and safety standards.He has acquired building permits and supervised project construction as well as reviewed plans and specifications. Fernando Vargas (Project Inspector) has over 9 years of experience in materials testing and inspection services in both the public and private sectors.His duties have included sampling and field and laboratory testing of soils and concrete. He has served as lead project inspector for public projects of various scope including water and sewer,drainage,roadway,utilities and industrial. The water and sewer projects include new facilities,retrofitting of existing facilities,and repairs to existing systems. Monitoring of costs and schedule throughout these projects ensures the client is always receiving a quality product on time and within budget. Stantec Staff Project Role Current Availability Workload Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP Principal in Charge 80% 20% Terrance N.Glunt,PE,LEED AP QA/QC Manager 80% 20% Jeffrey S.Crews,PE,LEED AP Project/Client Manager 60% 40% Sean Compel,PE,LEED AP Construction Administrator 60% 40% Carlos Herdocia,PE,LEED AP Civil Site Planning&Design Engineer - 50% 50% Dave Clarke,PE,CFM Utility Coordinator 50% 50% Rodrigo Rodriguez,PE Senior Environmental Engineer 50% 50% Marlon Medina,PE,CFM Roadway/Drainage Engineer 50% 50% MustafaAlbassam,PE,LEED AP Roadway/Drainage Engineer 50% 50% Earl Henry,EI Civil Site Planning&Designer 50% 50% Danilo Caicedo,EI Senior Inspector 50% 50% Fernando Vargas Inspector 50% 50% 15 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFC)20`4-.346-'13 Additionally,we are augmenting our team with subconsultants with whom we have worked previously on successful projects. . Rosenberg Gardner Design provides land planning and landscape architectural services to a wide range of public and private clients throughout South Florida,the Mid-Atlantic `4 States,and South America,including several leading large residential and commercial developers.These collaborations produced a multitude of single and multifamily residences, Rosenberg! community masterplans,as well as commercial endeavors such as hotels,retail centers, Desi pup! offices and industrial complexes. In the public sector,they serve several South Florida municipalities such as Miami Beach,Coral Gables, City of Miami,City of Hollywood,Miami-Dade and Broward Counties,the Florida Department of Natural Resources,Florida Department of Transportation and the South Florida Water Management District, often through Miscellaneous Services Contracts. Public projects have included landscape designs for transit stations,major highways and local streets in both commercial and residential areas,bicycle and pedestrian path systems up to 200 miles in length, parks and recreation areas ranging from a few to up to 600 acres in size,school campuses,the Miami International Airport Landscape Master Plan,parking garages and entry features. President Ken Gardner is intimately involved in every project and assembles the design team's differing backgrounds to create innovative,beautiful and sustainable landscape experiences. Vale WINGERTER Wingerter Laboratories,Inc.(WLI)is a family owned,third generation firm that was founded in January 1949 as a Construction Materials Engineering Testing Profossionat Engtnooring b Testing Laboratory to provide quality testing services for the construction industry in the South Florida area. WLI has been involved in some of South Florida's most recognizable historical construction projects which range from the Original Fontainebleau Hotel,the Rickenbacker Causeway, Jackson Memorial Hospital,the Metrorail,Bayside Marketplace,Joe Robbie Stadium and the Ft. Lauderdale and Miami International Airports. They offer the most comprehensive and specialized testing and quality control services including forensic investigations and specialty work for which there is no ASTM or specified test method. Today,WLI remains a strong,knowledgeable leader that has shaped the South Florida skyline continually delivering the quality services,unique perspectives,and specialty testing services with cost consciousness and efficiency at the forefront. LZNG1TUDE Longitude Surveyors,LLC,is a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)/ S U R V E Y O R S Community Business Enterprise(CBE)based in Miami-Dade with a satellite office in Palm Beach County.Eddie Suarez,registered as a Professional Surveyor and Mapper since 2001, is the founder and President of the firm.Eddie and the firm have extensive experience surveying in South Florida.Longitude currently has a 21 person staff,running 5 two-man field crews daily.The office is supported by three(3)Professional Surveyors and Mappers,one(1)Surveyor in Training,three(3)CAD operators,and two(2)administrative assistants.They have completed Topographic Surveys,ALTA Surveys,As-Built Surveys,and prepared Sketch and Legal Descriptions.They are certified in Miami- Dade County,as well as with FDOT and MDX. 16 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an °`As•Needed-Basis" RR)2':i i 4- 4 -YC LICENSES State o f Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Ramon Castella, P.E. EBPE is licensed as a Professional nglneer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201506174 40073 State of Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Terrance Neal Glunt IFBPE • %II'i,,i"1 .511%1" is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2015 P.E.Lic.No:40130 Audit No: 228201531162 Special inspector Sl Lic.No:950 • State of orl a Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Jeffrey'Scott Crews, P.E. P BPE is licensed as a Professional ngineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201526067 46575 State of Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Sean P. Compel, P.E. F BPE_. is licensed as a Professional ngineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201508245 66618 17 Prafess?anal Arc ifect;:real and E-r'gzr.eerg Services° �c a o C to o !ea a n 'c a s " `. i 4 ., , :• �c�r v..o�ii�e��,�:,.g.,r�. �; .r- e . AS�'�l�e Needed-Basis"is .� � � , �t LICENSES State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Carlos Manuel Herdocia, P.E. FBPE_ Is licensed as a Professional ngtneer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E Lic.No: Audit No: 228201511470 47660 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Dave E. Clarke, P.E. FBPE is licensed as a Professional e ngineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E tic.No: Audit No: 228201512147 66553 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Rodrigo Oscar Rodriguez, P.E. FBPE : ,_:2,,.,-.,...‘, is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.tic.No: Audit No: 228201524756 20021 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers I Attests that Mustafa O. Albassam, P.E. E.B PE �ANM'1T+.�r Is licensed as a Professional E -ngineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expirotion:2/28/2015 P.E.Lit.No: Audit No: 228201533473 I 76998 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Marlon Jessit Medina, P.E. 1 Mil Is licensed as a Professional ngmeer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2128(2015 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 22820.15335271 77052 18 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" PF`)2'.'i 4-'4 -YCj LEED CERTICATION JJJ JJJ J JJ JJJ _JJ J_J J JJ JJJ GBCI GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Ramon Castella Jeffrey Crews LEEDS ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL LEED'ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL �\ $41 111 Ma,15.'009 / 411Z !Lamb,M. JJJ JJJ JJ.J _1_,_1 JJJ JJJ JJJ JJJ GBCI GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Sean Compel Carlos Herdocia LEEDS ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL kk LEEDS ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL $4112-1^— Liar 15.2009 / L r1" May 15.2009 e� J J:J J,J J J.J J JJ J_J J JJ JJJ GBCI GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Terrance N. Glunt Mustafa Albassam LEED'O ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL LEEDS ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL � 141 • $41 11`�V Id,I5.t009 /(j 4^n g nine 24,211,19 19 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG LICENSES - LONGITUDE SURVEYORS, LLC F xn� Florida Deparnnent of Atgicuttnre and Cnnnumer Services Diaision of Consumer Services I.icrrtsc No.:1,87335 + C Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers , 2015 Ltitpiraticvt Date February 28.2015 2005 Apalachee Pl.'cvav'Tallahassee,Florida 3399-�00 �O an+b Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License Under the provisions of Chapter 472.Florida Statutes LONGRITDF.SITRVE.VORS,T.LC 4055 N.W.97 AVENZTF:SECOND FT.00R DURAL FL 33178 ADAM TI.PUTNAM COMt<'1TSStONF.R OF AGRICULTURE Tait is to can°j that the pro4ai an al surveyor and man).whale Bane ao d addr--u xe tan an above is hcensd as regt>ced by Cn4tev4 72.Florida Sautes. vdi t'� Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Consumer Services License Nn.:LS6313 Board of.Profeisional Surveyors and Mappers e,. !� Sq Expiration Date: February 25,2015 t'E 2005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399-6500 }eoo as�4 Professional Surveyor and Mapper License Under the provisions of Chapter 472,Florida Statutes EDUARDO M SUAREZ 4055 NW 97 AVENUE 2ND FLOOR DORAL,FL 33178 ADAM It.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE Tins 1a to certify that the professional surveyor and mapper whose name and address are shown above S licensed 35 requinal by Chapter 47'Florida Stabiles. 20 • 7'-:).--'-',,.c•Ir7:' ;.r^t"�ti,:c+te�r t anfi Er gIn„er' a Ser'ce 'r. . t— ;/!-+'Ti c ��e cic ie R i Basis- T _ st.�,,._., ,i _ ... .. .-,.al>�'f:�t_�r' (jr.t.r, 'Qa�-"� ,Ef.1�� �(a a_. ,t.x_ 1- �1• . LICENSES - ROSENBERG GARDNER DESIGN RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ " ` ❑ LICENSE NUMBER I \•'T: • + j_• LC0000266 tr.J••... h r The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS • '*J•�,�oj Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑_; ; Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 ROSENBERG GARDNER DESIGN 17670 N.W.78 AVENUE or_. SUITE 214 MIAMI FL 33015 VIVA MMOAIOA RICK SCOTT.GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ ' ' 0 LICENSE NUMBER LA0001569 �::45%&.-13:. ,}f ,•'': The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT =��'�' Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑ -�_ Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 GARDNER,KENNETH ERIC 426 STONEMONT DR iiirl— WESTON FL 33326 • VIVA FEOVIOA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE r,`'' ;' LICENSE NUMBER LA6667205 P'``.. ;=,-' The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT t_� Named below HAS REGISTERED `� Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 ' '.'.- ❑ SEMLER,TAYLOR KIEHL ' 1025 MERIDAN AVE APT 208 - ti:' '�*1 MIAMI BEACH FL 33139 `*' { � •❑.r.- 4 21 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-C LICENSES - WINGERTER LABORATORIES, INC. State of on a Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Winaerter Laboratories. Inc. I I(hill)\lit)\41)!It .�M.'Nr'�;' 1''771\.T.\U 1'A�.III'• is authorized under the provisions of Section 47.1.023,Florida Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration:2/28/2015 CA Uc.No: Audit No: 228201502590 Certificate of Authorization 614 Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. CMEC1820 NE 144 Street North Miami,FL 33181 ;, (I Accreditation ID:1001738 This Is to certify that this taboratory has been accredited for teefm ieal competence and found to meet the requirements for peAom+/ng the teat methods Med below for the inspection and testing of construction materfala AASHTO R18 , Reinspectlon Due Date:717/2015 Concrete: C10641309,C1231,C1381121,C1431119,C172R60,C1731198,C2311152,C31123,C39122,C42124,C4961198,C511,C8171231, C78197,C805,C939,Spin C1077 Expires-1016/2015 Aggregate: C117T11 Coarse.C117111 Fine,0127185,C128T84,C131T98,C138127 Coarse,C138T27 Flne,C142T112,C29T19,C40T21,C535, C5681255,07021248,0881104,04791,Soecitcatton C1077 Expos-1015/201S Masonry: C1019,C140 Expires-10/812015 Soil: 01140,D15577180,018831193,D22181285,02487,02488,D421R58,D422188,134318189,D43181E0,D49441217,D89381310,0898799, FM5514,FM5515,FM5550,FM5551,FM5552,FM5553,Specification 03740,1287 Expires-101012015 Fla%i-A.Sa,lazae. David A.Savage Christopher J.Robinson.P.E. Director of Accreditation Executive Director m OUTTE N 4Ca ti of accreditation can be obtained by viewing the CMEC Directory of Accredited Laboratories(wwecenrec.org) 22 Stantec Tab 2 MIAMIBEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis",Miami Beach,FL 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER N/A RFQ#2014-346-YG B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP,Vice President 5.NAME OF FIRM Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (305)445-2900 (305)774-6277 ramon.castella(a�stantec.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) g 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT a , n a mE. Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 900 Group B-Engineering a. X Coral Gables,Florida 33134 Civil Engineering Services ® CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Rosenberg Gardner Design,Inc. Palmetto Executive Building 5190 NW 167th Street,Suite 111 b. X Miami,Florida 33014 Landscape Architectural Services ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Longitude Surveyors,LLC 8290 NW 64th Street Miami,Florida 33166 C. X Surveying Services ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 1820 Northeast 144th Street Wingerter Laboratories,Inc., North Miami,Florida 33181 d. X Geotechnical Engineering Services ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM Please see attached on the following page. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 23 STANDARD FORM 330 Bur aani..ua teorngoaloa3 • • M a:En cal.iapi adeospue • •1 1 ° v ,o _ i a) - a ,� I � � Ao �utddB sgardae ng • I. - two . - A q ., uo nqT: tQ m• • • • • • • • • • • • y z 0 2 wain sa l i£Iddng;nom, o n t1.0 a r. sieMaua�uEgifx • • • • chi a aufio • • • • • • • • • • • g o us is l esital S o ho C/2 a 4 U 0 � s oo d.0uFITIII S • • • • e m Z E._ m satpn�S u??Id.Poot' ' • • • • • rn a a P K. IesoastQ sg luaupsam, `ud a o , ma •• • • • • • • • • • sattriTosamotIvaioaa., • • • e • • e • • • �rti�g9L • • • • • • aaeu Ial do FtEa uT • • • • • • • e • • • W` : E i �II°Ied/slaa4S/sAum TH; • • • • e • • • • • • • att 7sd-1sO3, • • • e e • • • • 1 • 1 i watuaaeirs j!sa03; • • • • i • • uueauJua te1seo3 • • • • • • • • • aauauadaq sxeaA, M m g3 co rn a ' n' rn 0° c c° !aj ^ j3 z z ^ z z � a A X10 13 v a p; F `n v2 E. I a z i W Z " W W v a W cn W E. r, " Pa � ..cn ..i a v P4 � a c° a' W N ; ' °d y, a) ' � v, W" m W a, . , w a " o w w 1 ! i q o a3i U 8 o z 2 w d -o y U ^° o 3 u, x E 0 N o " c g U o _o o, C) PG x o g b CD a) it i U o ti > .d 1 ' q a c ag ! o P'I °'' a F v2 U 2 2 A PG W A f� W E-■ !Z .4 V C7 'w Pa Z ' a g a E W "5 U 4 -2 Cn U U m t'. O ) o a a 0 0 o m _Q a co ' U A A N v A , cd m W V A bb A W r-. W 'o Ci q a w a a a -� W u 9 p s . m w 0 w r p o • a C m 6a o w a a a j-� 2 m a u'0 413 X FH 0 a w u a = Sc � ^° U W p, o a o x o g aZ °' Q a 0 Z 5 CD G go U w a) o W g a . C U u.i a o W w g O A 2 7.6 1 U 4. > t aLi `p Q s. O cn a N m �. O O v o Z a a) -o 'Ts .c o ` U c CC 0 G q W o O O aF 0 H E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Jeffrey Crews,PE,LEED AP Project/Client Manager 26 26 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services,Inc.-Boca Raton,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE ANDDISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida Professional Engineer License No.46575; Cum Laude,University of Miami,1988 Certified Masonry Inspector No.SMI-74; FICE/FDOT LRFD Seminar Training;LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Design Criteria for Palm Island and Hibiscus Island PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Design Criteria Professional and Project Manager for the preparation of design-build criteria packages including design a. development plans.This project was a full reconstruction project of Palm Island,and Hibiscus Island.The islands are an exclusive and historic high end residential neighborhood in Biscayne Bay. The scope of work includes drainage,roadway,water, landscaping,lighting,and undergrounding of utilities.Project also includes cost estimating,maintenance of traffic,scheduling, storm water pollution prevention,permitting,and construction management. The scope of work included the development of a master prototype Design Criteria Package with a new approach to the design build delivery system. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flamingo Park Football Stadium PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2013 2014 b (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Lead Civil Engineer and Sports field Specialist for the redevelopment of an existing football stadium. The project involved the construction of a new artificial turf field and new 8 lane track with rubberized running surface. Services include extensive drainage design in this extremely low lying area in Miami Beach. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park(Phase 1&2) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011-On going Phase 2 2012-Phase 2 est.2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Senior Engineer for the design for a 9-acre,$10 million urban park as part of the area renewal and community redevelopment c. district. This Gold LEED Certified project consists of a 6,400 s.f.recreation center,4,000 s.f.renovated community center, 15,000 s.f.basketball gymnasium,bowling alley,concession area,football and baseball fields and an aquatic center,all of which will be completed in two phases. The development of the park was carefully arranged to meet the program requirements while working within strict space limitations. Taking these limitations into consideration,our company worked to develop footprints and a site layout that uses the space available in the most efficient manner. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Grapeland Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I1 Check if project performed with current firm Principal Engineer for the design and planning of a 10-acre,$19 million urban park as part of the area renewal and airport improvement district. This project transformed an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex into a regional, needs-based park which includes a water theme park and a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such,the design of Grapeland Park,located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood,is able to accommodate both multi-modal transportation access and all required parking(505 spaces). (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Little Haiti Soccer Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm e. This design-build parks and recreational facility for the City of Miami includes a tournament soccer stadium with seating for 750 people.For this project,the stadium is a cast-in-place concrete structure with concession,restroom and maintenance spaces built into the underside of the seating.In addition to the main tournament field,the project includes a practice field; playground;splash deck;exercise trail;shelters;parking;and a future Community Center.The firm has provided civil engineering including utilities,drainage,parking,grading,permitting,as well as structural design for the stadiums'structure. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 25 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP Principal in Charge 29 26 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services,Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida Professional Engineer License No.40073 Florida International University,1985 Puerto Rico Professional Engineer License No.11731 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Golden Beach,Florida 2012 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm a. Principal in Charge for this Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas: drainage improvements;utilities underground relocation(electrical,telephone,cable);streetscape&traffic calming;and renovation to the Town's existing Town Hall building.The Master Plan carefully considered the each of these with respect to feasibility,cost/benefit,and design,as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios,and schedule for phasing and implementation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Caribbean Blvd.(Coral Sea Rd.to SW 87Ave.) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Cutler Bay,Florida 2013 2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge of design improvements for the portion of Caribbean Blvd.between Coral Sea Road and SW 87th Avenue. b. The project consists of roadway improvements,two(2)traffic circles,pavement reconstruction,curbwork,sidewalks,drainage facilities,medians,turn lanes,landscaping and roadway lighting.This portion of Caribbean Blvd.is primarily a residential road. This Miami-Dade County roadway is considered a collector roadway.The proposed configuration for Caribbean Blvd.will include roundabouts at Gulf Stream Rd.and SW 192 Dr.for traffic calming and beautification.The corridor will be a two lane roadway with turn lanes,landscape medians and traffic calming splitter islands where plausible.Permitting including Miami- Dade County Public Works,DERM and Town of Cutler Bay. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm c. Principal in Charge of the civil portion of this$8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage and streetscape improvement project encompassing several miles of road in a developed flood-prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal.Permitting included pre/post computer modeling and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Claude Pepper Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami,Florida 2011 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE RI Check if project performed with current firm d. Principal in Charge responsible for the civil engineering design of a 30,000 sq.ft.community center at Claude Pepper Park. The program calls for,among other spaces,a series of multi-purpose rooms to conduct teaching and day-care for youth. In addition the gymnasium is to serve as a training,recreation facility and as a gathering/assembly space for the City of North Miami community. The spaces need to be flexible,adaptable to multitude of functions and our design achieves this requirement. Various site constraints have placed a special challenge for the siting of this building. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Crandon Boulevard Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Key Biscayne,Florida 2006-2014 2007-2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge and Senior Project Engineer for this project that took an existing suburban style highway and transformed it e. into a center of community activities. By promoting the safe and secure transit of all types of vehicles and pedestrians,this CPTED-friendly design also serves to create a source of identity for the community connecting retail,residential,public parks and government facilities into a cohesive design. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the design for a 4- lane divided road,improved public safety,easing of traffic congestion,traffic calming,pedestrianization,improved mass transit, streetscape improvements,sidewalks,lighting,and a roundabout. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 26 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT - a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Terrance Glunt,PE QA/QC Manager 38 19 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc.-Boca Raton,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,Florida Florida Professional Engineer License No.:40130; International University,1985; Threshold Inspector License No.:0950; Bachelor of Science in Environmental Sciences, Structural Masonry Inspector No.:SMI 2049; Juniata College,Huntington,Pennsylvania,1976 Florida Certified Dispute Resolution Board Member No.:0903 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Florida Engineering Society Broward Chapter President;Deerfield Beach Community Appearance Board Chair;National Society of Professional Engineers; American Society of Civil Engineers;American Public Works Association 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Grapeland Park&Aquatic Facility Complex PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Principal in Charge of planning and architectural design for a 10-acre,$20 million urban park as part of the area renewal and a. airport improvement district. This project took an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex and transformed it into a regional,needs-based park which included a water theme park,as well as a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such,the design of Grapeland Park,located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood,is able to accommodate both multi-modal transportation access and all required parking. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ferndale 20"Watermain/24"Force Main PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Delray Beach,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm b Principal in Charge for the design and permitting of a new 20-inch diameter ductile iron water main approximately 4,000 feet long,along with 200 LF of 24"Force Main.Project included two aerial canal crossings of the Lake Worth Drainage District canals and direct burial piping along Lake Ida Road. Coordination with three other projects was needed for tie-ins at those locations.Additionally,the project included detailed investigations of utilities and possible conflicts along route of the main. The project construction cost was$800,000.00. Our company also performed construction administration during construction phase and provided final certification to FDEP and PBCHD. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) _ (2)YEAR COMPLETED Basin D-2 Stormwater Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Palm Beach County,Florida 2006 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Senior design engineer of a municipal stormwater pump station for the Town of Palm Beach in Palm Beach County.The project c. included preparation of the engineering design report,drawings and specifications.The station has a discharge capacity of 55,500 gpm into Lake Worth(Atlantic ICWW).The Station included three 18,500 gpm electric submersible mixed-flow 200 hp propeller driven pumps within a large reinforced concrete below-ground wet well.The station discharges thru 3 large diameter pipes to a discharge structure and then via a spillway into Lake Worth.The control building houses an 800 kW diesel emergency generator,Motor Control Center,the Automatic Transfer Switch,and the Station Control Panel. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Plantation 84 Avenue Transit Greenway&Mobility Enhancements and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Traffic Studies,Plantation,Florida 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager for the master planning,design and permitting services for this roadway reconstruction project.The project involved about 3,500 linear feet(2/3 mile)of roadway including storm water improvements,roadway reconstruction,colored concrete sidewalk,paver brick crosswalks,lighting,landscaping and signalization design. The purpose of the project was to create a more pedestrian friendly center city venue for moving foot traffic across Broward Boulevard,a six lane section.A traffic study supported the design to reduce the roadway from 4 to 2 lanes with parallel parking and landscape islands in the median. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Doral Meadows Park pROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Doral,Florida 2007 2007 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm e• Principal in Charge for the renovations to an existing 6-acre park including the complete reconfiguration of 2 baseball fields,2 football fields and all associated pathways and plazas. The football fields were replaced with synthetic turf complete with an underdrain system that allows the fields to be played on within an hour after a major rain event. The project also included an ADA accessible playground with shade structures,a picnic shelter,paths with fitness stations,lighting and installation of a drainage system to upgrade the property. 27 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Sean Compel,PE,LEED AP Construction Administrator 12 12 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. - Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(D EGREEANDSPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering State of Florida Professional Engineer License No.66618 University of Miami,Miami,Florida,2002 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.)N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Golden Beach,Florida 2012 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm a. Construction Administrator for this comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas:town-wide drainage improvements;utilities underground relocation(electrical,telephone,cable);and town- wide streetscape&traffic calming.The Master Plan carefully considered each of these with respect to feasibility,cost/benefit, and design,as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios,and schedule for phasing and implementation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and System Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pinecrest,Florida 2008 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Engineer and Construction Administrator for the design of over 27 miles of watermain to complete the potable water system of the entire Village. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system and public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the extensive work and cost involved in the project. C3TS also prepared special taxing districts to better explain the finances of the project. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Palmetto Bay,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm °• Project Engineer and Construction Administrator for the field surveying,design,permitting,bidding,and construction of drainage improvements at various locations throughout the Village.The Village's stormwater master plan identified and prioritized areas with flooding problems.Many areas had no existing drainage.Each phase of construction included the installation of drainage structures,exfiltration trenches,connections to the existing system,and associated restoration.All three phases of work were completed on schedule and under budget. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach West 29th Street Bridge Repairs PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2010 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm d. Construction Administrator and Engineering Inspector for repairs to different elements of the existing bridge including cracks on underside of bridge,delaminations and spalls at beams and deck underside,repairs to exposed and damaged steel reinforcement, repair/replacement of control joints on bridge deck,and asphalt milling and resurfacing. This project was completed ahead of schedule and within budget. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Reclaimed Water Distribution System PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Key Biscayne,Florida 2008 2009 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Construction Administrator for this Civil/site work,including site clearing,earthwork and grading,paving,reclaimed water mains including services,valves and appurtenances,landscaping and roadway/right-of-way restoration.The reclaimed water distribution system was installed from the northern Village limits running south,primarily along Fernwood Road,to West Mashta Drive.The project included the installation of service lines and meter boxes for future use. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 28 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT a-TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Carlos Herdocia,PE,LEED AP Civil Site Planning&Design Engineer 26 26 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Florida Professional Engineer License No.47660 Florida International University,1988 LEED Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.)N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NE 19th Avenue Roadway Improvements(NE 171st Street to NE 183rd PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Street),North Miami Beach,Florida 2009 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Manager and Senior Roadway Engineer(Engineer of Record)for the reconstruction of all non-signalized intersections to provide roadway widening and resurfacing project including pavement widening,overlay,curb and gutter,curbed islands, landscaping,drainage,on-street parking,lighting,pavement marking and signage,drainage fumes at the corner radii,and median nosing.The project also included a new roundabout at each of the non-signalize median openings. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Design&Construction Services for John F.Kennedy Causeway PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Redevelopment,North Bay Village,Florida 2011 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Senior Engineer for this project that involves the design and construction services for the redevelopment of the John F. Kennedy Causeway.The project was implemented in several phases.Phase I was the landscape design and construction of street beautification improvements to the western end of the Causeway.While this phase was implemented,a conceptual master plan was prepared to address the complete beautification and redevelopment program for Kennedy Causeway which included the roadway,adjacent business district,and the waterfront. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Golden Beach,Florida 2012 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm c. Senior Civil Engineer for this comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas:town-wide drainage improvements;utilities underground relocation(electrical,telephone,cable);town- wide streetscape&traffic calming;and renovation to the Town's existing Town Hall building. The Master Plan carefully considered the each of these with respect to feasibility,cost/benefit,and design,as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios,and schedule for phasing and implementation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Miami Downtown Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) South Miami,Florida 2005 2006 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d. Senior Civil Engineer involved with street and drainage improvements.Design elements included over 200 feet of exfiltration trench,200 feet of solid pipe,ten drainage structures,milling and resurfacing of roadway,side walk,curb and gutter stripping& signing landscaping and irrigation and maintenance of traffic(MOT)plans. Also responsible for the production of demolition, geometry paving grading and drainage,typical sections and detail,landscaping and irrigation plans. Duties also included drainage report and detailed cost estimates. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Crandon Boulevard Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Key Biscayne,Florida 2006-2014 2007-2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Project Engineer for this project that took an existing suburban style highway and transformed it into a center of community e' activities. By promoting the safe and secure transit of all types of vehicles and pedestrians,this CPTED-friendly design also serves to create a source of identity for the community connecting retail,residential,public parks and government facilities into a cohesive design. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the design for a 4-lane divided road,improved public safety,easing of traffic congestion,traffic calming,pedestrianization,improved mass transit,streetscape improvements, sidewalks,lighting,and a roundabout. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 29 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Marlon Medina,PE Project Roadway/Drainage Engineer 6 5 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services,Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,Florida State University, Florida Engineer Intern 2008 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.)N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Old Cutler Road(SW 97-87Ave) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Cutler Bay,Florida 2011 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Project Engineer assisting in the design improvements for the portion of Old Cutler Road between SW 97th Avenue and SW a. 87th Avenue.The project consists of roadway improvements,traffic circles,pavement resurfacing,sidewalks,drainage facilities,medians,landscaping and lighting. Old Cutler Road is designated a historic roadway which required all improvements to respect the existing roadway footprint,thus limiting the modification and/or additional widening of the road. This Miami- Dade County roadway is considered an arterial collector roadway. The proposed configuration for Old Cutler Road included roundabouts at each end of the corridor for traffic calming and beautification. The 1.24 mile corridor between these two roundabouts is a two lane roadway with turn lanes,landscape medians and scramble lanes. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Coral Gables Citywide Assessment of all City Owned Roadways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Coral Gables,Florida 2013 On-going (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Engineer assisted in this City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights-of way within the City limits.A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a City aerial map using GIS.This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually • served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan,construction documents which included 11x17 plans,specifications,project manual and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Medley Sewer System Repairs&Rehabilitation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Medley,Florida 2009 2010 0. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE EI Check if project performed with current firm Engineer Intern for the evaluation of Medley's Sewer system.Tasks included assisting project manager with Pump station readings,data collection,Shop Drawings review and analyses of the comprised study.The study area consists of 14 Pump Stations covering 8 square miles. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FIU Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study and Design of I&I Repairs and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Rehabilitation,Miami,Florida 2010 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d Engineer Intern for the evaluation of Inflow and Infiltration(I&I)within FIU's sewer system.The SSES was performed on over 40,000 feet of gravity lines,9 pump stations,and 150 manholes,all in compliance with the Miami-Dade Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance(VSCO)and Plan A and Plan B of the Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM)guidelines for"Second Cycle SSES Submittals".We implemented a time sensitive schedule which included inspections and repairs needed to make the sewer system compliant before submitting an extensive SSES report to FIU. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and System Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pinecrest,Florida 2008 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Engineer for this project which included the design of over 27 miles of watermain to complete the potable water system of the entire Village.The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system and public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the extensive work and cost involved in the project. The firm also prepared special taxing districts to better explain the finances of the project. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 30 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Mustafa Albassam,PE,LEED AP Project Roadwa Drain a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM � y/ age Engineer 9 8 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc.-Boca Raton,Florida 16. EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Post Baccalaureate Certificate Program in Geographic LEED Accredited Professional,U.S.Green Building Information Systems,Pennsylvania State University,University Council Park,Pennsylvania,2010 Professional Engineering No.#76998,State of Florida Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,Florida Atlantic University_Boca Raton.Florida.2008 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flamingo Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of Applicable) Miami Beach,Florida 2013 2014 a. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Civil Designer on the replacement of the existing track facility within the Park.The project included the design of a new football/soccer field artificial turf facility.Associated drainage structures and drainage wells were also designed and permitted with the County. 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 84th Avenue Transit Greenway&Mobility Enhancements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Plantation,Florida 2012 2014 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Civil Designer for the traffic engineering services for this traffic study to investigate the feasibility of reducing travel lanes b' from four to two lanes on NW/SW 84th Avenue,one lane each direction,while maintaining the required Level of Service (LOS)for the roadway.In addition,the traffic study also evaluated the feasibility of converting the current two-way stop controlled intersection at NW 2nd Street and NW 84th Avenue to an all-way stop controlled intersection.Services performed as part of this contract included:traffic data collection,intersection and arterial capacity analysis,optimization of signal timings at Broward Blvd and 84th Avenue intersection,safety analysis and preparation of reports. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Reclaimed Water Pipeline Canal Crossing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Margate,Florida 2011 2012 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm c' Project Designer for the construction of 2000 LF of 16"reclaimed water main.The project included a 600'segment " J gn p � gment of 18 HDPE Horizontal Direction Drilling(HDD)to cross a city canal and residential lot.The HDD required a complicated reverse curve alignment to remain within a designated easement and road right-of-way that were horizontally offset.The HDD also required unusual depth to ensure proper clearance under the canal. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami,Florida 2011(Phase 1) 2012(Phase 1) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm d. Civil Designer for this Gold LEED Certified project which consists of a 6,400 s.f.recreation center,4,000 s.f.renovated community center,15,000 s.f.basketball gymnasium,bowling alley,concession area,football and baseball fields and an aquatic center,all of which will be completed in two phases.The development of the park was carefully arranged to meet the program requirements while working within strict space limitations.Taking these limitations into consideration,the firm worked to develop footprints and a site layout that uses the space available in the most efficient manner. (i) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED John Pennekamp Campground PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Key Largo,Florida 2009 2010 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm Mustafa was responsible for the design of a sanitary sewer collection system to service the 47 site campground at John e. Pennekamp. The system consisted of approximately 1,000 linear feet of 8"gravity sewer lines, six concrete manholes and the associated service laterals to each camp site. The lift station is provided with a new deeper wet well as needed to accommodate the new campground collection system. The station electrical and piping is reconfigured to the new wet well layout. The electrical system refurbishment consisted of assessing the nature and extent of the recurring chronic line shorting and voltage drops,and determining which electrical wiring runs conduits,and/or service panels need to be replaced. The project also includes the construction of a drainage system as needed to drain the proposed paved areas. 31 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Dave Clarke,PE,CFM Utility Coordinator 12 12 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc. - Coral Gables,Florida 18.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Master of Science,Civil Engineering,Florida International University,2008 Professional Engineer#66553,State of Florida Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering,Florida International Certified Floodplain Manager#US-12-06737,State of Florida University,2002 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.)N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Coral Gables Citywide Assessment of all City Owned Roadways PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Coral Gables,Florida 2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 10 Check if project performed with current firm a. Engineer of Record responsible for the City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights-of way within the City limits.A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a City aerial map using GIS. This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan,construction documents which included 11x17 plans,specifications,project manual and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Riviera Beach Roadway Sidewalk Pavement Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Riviera Beach,Florida 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm b. Engineer of Record responsible for the professional services to assess the condition of approximately 85 centerline miles of existing roadway pavement network and use the information to develop a Multi-year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan for the City.The project also includes assessment of sidewalk,and asset inventory of catch basin and manhole.In association with Enterinfo,the data collection is carried out using their data collection van(eRoadInfo). They will process the data and populated into MicroPaver software version 6.5.1(City of Riviera Beach's preferred software)to perform present condition analysis for each segment of the existing roadway sections in terms of the PCI. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Pavement Evaluation and Five-Year Maintenance& PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Rehabilitation Plan,Doral,Florida 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Engineer of Record responsible for developing Pavement Management System(PMS)for approximately 57 miles of City owned c. road. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index(PCI). The PCI is a subjective method of evaluating distresses in pavement by providing a numerical rating between 0 and 100 where 0 is worst and 100 is best condition. Utilizing MicroPaver,prediction/deterioration models were developed to predict future pavement conditions and identify Maintenance and Rehabilitation(M&R)projects. Our company completed a final report which included a strategic Five-Year M&R work plan and a budget analysis to address these projects. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Town of Cutler Bay Pavement Evaluation and Maintenance& Rehabilitation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Program,Cutler Bay,Florida 2009 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm d Project Engineer assisting with the inventory and assessment of approx.90 miles of pavement and 10 miles of sidewalk condition in the public rights-of way within the Town limits.This study provided an inventory of the pavement and categorizes the condition based on cracks,raveling,pot holes,ruts,utility cuts etc. The improvements for the damaged pavement consisted of asphalt overlay and was organized based primarily on the Town's funding.Additional criteria for pavement improvements were also based on the Safe Routes to School that were established by Miami Dade County Public Works and Miami-Dade County Public Schools and proposed Town of Cutler Bay stormwater management improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED West Kendall District Park New 12&16 inch Watermain PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2006 2007 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Engineer involved in the master development a new 160 acre regional park for Miami-Dade Parks and Recreation Department.This project included the installation of 3,150 linear feet of 16"WM and fire hydrants on SW 157th Avenue from SW 120th Street to SW 112th Street and 1,800 linear feet of 12"WM on SW 120th Street.Both WM were donated to Miami-Dade Water&Sewer Department(WASD)upon completion.Responsible for design,specifications,quantities,construction cost estimate,shop drawings,and all permits acquisition. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 32 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Rodrigo Rodriguez,PE Environmental Engineer 41 17 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering,University of Florida Professional Engineer#20021,State of Florida 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) State VP- Region WI,Florida Engineering Society;Director, Cuban-American Association of Civil Engineers;National Society of Professional Engineers 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Master Plan and System Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pinecrest,Florida 2008 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm a. Senior Project Engineer for this project which included the design of over 27 miles of water mains to complete the potable water. system of the entire Village.The Master Plan prepared included a computerized hydraulic model of the entire system, participated in public workshops and meetings held to inform and educate the residents of the extensive work and cost involved in the project.The firm also prepared special taxing districts to better explain the finances of the project.Alternate funding from several sources funded the initial 2 phases of construction,including the larger diameter`backbone"system to be constructed. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Midway Stormwater Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami-Dade County,Florida 2008 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE IZI Check if ro'ect performed with current firm P J b. Project Engineer for the design and permitting of a stormwater pump station and force main under the SR 826(Palmetto Expressway)discharging to the North Line Canal through an energy dissipating structure and outfall. The pump station transmit the runoff collected from the existing collection system to the North Line Canal through directionally bored twin 24- inch diameter carrier pipes in two 36-inch HDPE casing pipes that cross under FDOT's SR-826 Expressway. The system was modeled resulting in collection system improvements to provide adequate flood protection to the area. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 595 E ress Design from 1-75 to West of 1-95(Conduits) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) xp g ( ) Broward County,FDOT District 4 2014 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm c. Project Engineer for this$1.22 Billion(Construction)Public Private Partnership(P3)Infrastructure project covering 10.5 Miles of improvements along I-595 including the total reconstruction of the interstate and the implementation of three reversible tolled express lanes. Utility Project Engineer for the development of JPA Horizontal Directional Drilling projects beneath I-595 for the installation of communication fiber optic facilities for Comcast and Fibernet(cable,television,telecommunication) under I 595 at Nob Hill Road and Davie Road,consisting of 850 feet of 4-2"HDPE bundles and 2-4"bundles. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Florida International University W1 Lift Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2010 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d. Senior Engineer for this project that consisted of a new replacement triplex lift-station with 45 Horsepower which handles all of the wastewater transmission for the West and South areas of the Modesto Maidique Campus.The construction cost for this project was$1 Million. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Highlands Village Neighborhood Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami Beach,Florida 2005 2007 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm e. Senior Civil Engineer for a$6 million dollar neighborhood improvement project in a low lying area of the City of North Miami Beach with extensive flooding and water quality problems resulting from failed onsite septic systems. The project included design of a pumped deep well disposal system,design of a wastewater collection and transmission system,including a new pump station and force main,design of roadway and site improvements,preparation of construction plans,permitting and preparation of grant applications seeking financial assistance to complete the project. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 33 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Earl Henry,EI Civil Site Planning&Designer 14 8 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec consulting Services Inc.-Boca Raton,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,Florida Construction Technicians 1995 Atlantic University,2006 Guilds Certificate of Construction 1995 Structural Engineering Diploma University of Technology, Kingston,Jamaica 1999 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)T FLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Reclaimed Water Pipeline Canal Crossing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Margate,Florida 2012 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm a. Civil Designer for this Design Build project for which our firm was the Engineer of Record for the construction of 2000 LF of 16" reclaimed water main. The project included a 600'segment of 18"HDPE Horizontal Direction Drilling(HDD)to cross a city canal and residential lot. The HDD required a complicated reverse curve alignment to remain within a designated easement and road right-of-way that were horizontally offset. The HDD also required unusual depth to ensure proper clearance under the canal. The project also included 1200'of direct bury installation to complete the entire alignment. We were responsible for all design and permitting aspects of the installation as well as field inspection during construction (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pompano Beach Drainage Basin 4-1 and 4-2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Pompano Beach,Florida 2009 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Designer for this project which involved design services for the neighborhood drainage improvements in the southeast section of the City.The area is a low-lying residential neighborhood in the coastal region resulting in high ground water table. The project included the development of significant amounts of French drain along with minor utility modifications and an asphalt overlay.The project included the development of significant amounts of French drain along with minor utility modifications and an asphalt overlay.Services included permitting and continued through procurement and construction. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Little Haiti Soccer Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2011 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost;etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm C. Project Designer responsible for the design of the grading,paving and drainage,and water and sewer for this 11.72 acres soccer field.In addition to the main tournament field,the project includes a practice field;playground;splash deck;exercise trail; shelters;parking;and a future Community Center.The firm has provided civil engineering including utilities,drainage,parking, grading,permitting,as well as structural design for the stadiums'structure. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Palmetto Bay Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Palmetto Bay,Florida 2007 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm d. The 24.5-acre park included an existing building structure that needed to be upgraded and a new system of utilities was incorporated into the park including a sanitary lift station and a new water main to service the park and surrounding community.Special consideration was given to light spill over to limit the amount of light shed onto the adjacent residential homes. Earl was responsible for the design of the grading,paving and drainage package,and water and sewer for this 24.8-acre park which includes a softball field,playground facilities and parking areas. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED D-2 Stormwater Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Palm Beach,Florida 2006 2008 e (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Assistant Project Engineer for large stormwater pump station for the Town of Palm Beach. Responsible for hydraulic calculations,lay-out,details,schematics,all AutoCAD drawings and all civil components of the water main and installation of a large lift station and force main. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 34 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14 YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Danilo Caicedo,EI Construction Engineering/Senior Inspector 24 11 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec Consulting Services Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Bachelor of Science in Engineering Florida International University 1990 Florida Engineer Intern 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.)N/A 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Golden Beach,Florida 2012 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm a. Senior Inspector for this comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas:town-wide drainage improvements;utilities underground relocation(electrical,telephone,cable);and town-wide streetscape&traffic calming.The Master Plan carefully considered each of these with respect to feasibility, cost/benefit,and design,as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios,and schedule for phasing and implementation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Indian Creek Village Entrance Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Village of Indian Creek,Florida 2011 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Senior Inspector responsible for the detailed construction estimates prepared for a feasibility review by the Village Council.The b' estimates were for improvements and enhancements to the Village.These included the reconfiguration of the Village's entrance by tightening the corner radii,expanding the landscaped corners on either side creating an oval landscaped island,and historically restoring of the existing gatehouse.The main roadway into the Village was also to be reconfigured by narrowing the travel lanes to 12-feet to inhibit speeding,introducing a center landscaped median,and an 8-foot pathway for pedestrians and bicyclists,plus providing lighting,as needed. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Belle Meade Drainage Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPT ION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm c. Senior Inspector of the civil portion of this$8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage and streetscape improvement project encompassing several miles of road in a developed flood-prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal.Permitting included pre/post computer modeling and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Norwood Oeffler Water Treatment Plant Administration Building PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) North Miami Beach,Florida 2004 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm d. Construction Engineer responsible for the constructions management related to the project. The project includes a large scale expansion and improvements to the existing water treatment plant that includes a new two story 14,500 sq ft administrative operations office building,a new 23,000 sq ft nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane technology building,in addition to support facilities such as high service pump rooms,motor control electrical rooms,generator rooms,a new 2,500 sq ft structure to hold sodium hypoclhorite tanks,metering rooms and storage. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Performing Arts Center Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) Services"SuperBlock",Miami,Florida N/A 2007 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPT ION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm e. Senior Inspector for the streetscape improvements and the Carnival Performing Arts Center constructed under this contract consisted of milling,resurfacing,sidewalk widening,signalization,lighting,drainage,and landscaping improvements on State Road 5(Biscayne Boulevard)from NE 14th Street to NE 15th Street and similar improvements on NE 13th,14th&15th Streets, NE 2nd Avenue&N.Bayshore Drive. Our company performed Construction Engineering and Inspections on behalf of the City of Miami Public Works Department. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 35 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Fernando Vargas Construction Engineering Inspector 10 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Stantec consulting Services Inc.-Coral Gables,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) N/A ACI Level I Field Technician;Certified Nuclear Gauge Operator,Nuclear Safety Certification; MOT Level II; CTQP Earthwork Level I 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Belle Meade Drainage Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION Grief Scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm a. Inspector for this $8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage improvement project encompassing several miles of road in developed flood-prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and gravity wells and discharging to the Miami River. Permitting included pre/post analysis and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NW 82nd Avenue Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Doral,Florida 2008 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,sizee,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm b. Inspector for this project which included the study, design, and construction administration of various improvements on NW 82nd Avenue from NW 12th Street to NW 25th Street. It consisted of milling and resurfacing, sidewalk and curb and gutter replacement and reconstruction, handicap ramp replacement, and drainage work including the installation of exfiltration trenches,concrete manholes and solid pipes. The project also involved the repair of damaged asphalt around existing manholes, valves,and above existing drainage trenches and crossings. The final design also included pavement markings and signage. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade County Roadway Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2009 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,sizee,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Inspector for this project which consists of supervising all operations necessary for the construction of a new 4-lane divided roadway along SW 157th Avenue(from SW 120th Street to SW 112th Street)including a new bridge over the C-IW Canal.The c. work includes new sidewalk,curb and gutter,median,a storm water drainage system,signage,pavement markings,signalization, and street lighting.The scope also include the new construction of a 2-lane roadway on SW 120th Street(from SW 157th Avenue to 1800 feet West of SW 157th Avenue),the construction of a new 16"water main along SW 157th Avenue(from SW 112th Street to SW 120th Street),the construction of 16"water main along SW 120th Street(from SW 157th Avenue to SW 162nd Avenue),and the installation of a 36"sewer force main along SW 157th Avenue(from SW 112th Street to SW 120th Street),as part of the overall wastewater master plan to complete a connection north of SW 112th Street. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Performing Arts Center Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Services"SuperBlock"Miami,Florida N/A 2007 d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost;etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Inspector responsible for inspection support and all materials testing for a high profile roadway reconstruction and resurfacing project in downtown Miami including:paver brick pavement,Superpave asphalt,decorative lighting,signalization,drainage,striping,signage,curb and gutter,sidewalks,and landscaping. Duties also include daily inspection reports,density log book,and sampling and testing of soils,concrete,and asphalt. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repairs(Phase 3) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Medley,Florida 2009 2011 e. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief Scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Inspector for this sanitary sewer rehabilitation and repair of Pump Station Areas 105.The project included cleaning of sanitary sewer lines,testing of sanitary sewer joint connections,grouting of cracks,lining or partial lining of damaged sanitary sewers,root removals,replacement of sewer pipes and manholes,and repairs of sanitary manholes. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 36 STANDARD FORM 330 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Eduardo M.Suarez,PSM Senior Surveyor 29 12 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Longitude Surveyors LLC—Miami,Florida 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) AA—Miami-Dade Community College,1990 LS 6313 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member—Florida Surveying and Mapping Society(Miami-Dade Chapter) 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS a. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Doral Bike Lanes,Doral,Florida 2014 2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Eduardo was in charge of the this Topographic survey including utility location, establishment of vertical and horizontal controls for construction,invert,cross sections and elevations,along NW 102 Avenue.Project fee was$33,900. b. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NW 36 Street from NW 79 Avenue to NW 72 Avenue PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Doral,Florida 2009 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE B Check if project performed with current firm Topographic survey which included utility location,bridge survey,drainage survey and digital terrain model.Project fee was $14,752 C. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Safe Routes to School—Coral Reef Elementary PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Village of Pinecrest 2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE EZ Check if project performed with current firm Eduardo was the Project Surveyor for this 2 miles Topographic Surveys for various locations.The purpose of the surveys was to determine right of way and existing conditions for future location and design of new sidewalks. d. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Village of Pinecrest Elevation Certificates 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Eduardo prepared and completed Elevation Certificates for the Village of Pinecrest Public Works Facility,Miami-Dade County Public Library Pinecrest Branch,various facilities within Pinecrest Gardens,Community Recreation Roomand Tennis Pro Shop within Coral Pine Park,Utility Building within Evelyn Greer Park and Garage Building within Suniland Park. e. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Village of Palmetto Bay City Hall 2009 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Eduardo was the Project Surveyor for the entire survey layout for the Village Hall construction.Prepared sketch to accompany legal descriptions for various easements for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Dept.Prepared sketch to accompany legal description for the closure of Holcomb Avenue(SW 98 Avenue Road).Performed final As-Built Survey and elevation certificates for certificate of occupancy. 37 STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004) E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ken Gardner Principal In Charge A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 23 21 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Rosenberg Gardner Design (Miami, Florida) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture Florida LA—0001569 University of Georgia, 1991 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member-American Society of Landscape Architects; Member—Community Image Advisory Board; Member—Transportation Aesthetics Review Board; Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Certified 1999; LEED AP, Certified 2009. 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS a. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Pointe Park Rehabilitation, Miami Beach, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Under this miscellaneous services contract, RGD prepared a plan for the rehabilitation of South Pointe Park. RGD conducted field tests and reviewed existing landscape, then prepared an extensive report to determine a course of action to remedy the deficiencies. The plan is currently being implemented. b. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Soundscape Park, Miami Beach, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm RGD prepared planting and irrigation plans and assisted in tree tagging in the field for this 2 1/2 acre park adjacent to the New World Symphony campus. RGD acted as a local Landscape Architect to West 8. The Park is an important venue for the City as a gathering place for residents and visitors alike, and a place where concerts and festivals are held throughout the year. C. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Harding Avenue Beautification,Surfside, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm RGD prepared the planting and irrigation plans for the recently completed beautification of the downtown district of Harding Avenue in Surfside. The project consisted of replacing the existing palms with new medjool date palms and the necessary sidewalk reconfigurations. RGD also created little"pocket parks"at the roadway crossings. d. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Marlins Ballpark, Miami, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2009 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm RGD prepared the hardscape plaza and streetscape design plans, as well as planting and irrigation plans for the new baseball stadium and stadium parking garages/lots for the Miami Marlins. A portion of the grounds surrounding the stadium was designed to accommodate public gatherings for art and entertainment. Part of the project included public infrastructure improvements to water mains and drainage areas on several surrounding streets. Estimated cost of project: $600 million. e. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED GSA West Lot, Miami, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm RGD prepared planting plans and streetscape design for a mixed-use retail, office and parking garage in downtown Miami. Extensive measures were taken in this design to preserve several large existing native trees. RGD also considered several aspects of sustainable landscape design, and the project received a LEED Gold Certification. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 38 it E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE T. Kiehl Semler Project Manager A.TOTAL B.WITH CURRENT FIRM 8 8 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Rosenberg Gardner Design (Miami, Florida) 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture Florida LA- 6667205 University of Georgia, 2008 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member-American Society of Landscape Architects 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS a. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Indian Creek, Indian Creek, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE • ® Check if project performed with current firm This project was a landscape beautification master plan for the entrance to the Island and streetscape of 44 homes and a golf course on an island in Biscayne Bay. RGD prepared plans and specifications to obtain bids to implement the Landscape Beautification Master Plan. b. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Old Cutler Road, Cutler Bay, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ▪ 0 Check if project performed with current firm RGD prepared landscape plans for an approximately 1% mile section of Historic Old Cutler Road through Cutler Bay. This plan incorporated wide sidewalks and a significant number of shade trees to provide for a pleasant pedestrian experience. An important aspect of this design was the utilization of"Connect to Protect", an innovative idea developed by Fairchild Tropical Gardens to connect natural areas with a"ribbon"of native plantings. C. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) •(2)YEAR COMPLETED Caribbean Boulevard, Cutler Bay, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE • ® Check if project performed with current firm This project was a 11/2 mile section of Caribbean Boulevard through the heart of Cutler Bay. RGD evaluated the existing vegetation and determined the best way to create a cohesive design and allow as much of the existing landscape as possible to remain. New trees and palms were proposed to enhance this design. RGD prepared planting and irrigation plans. d. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Stadium Site Parking, Miami, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) 2009 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE El Check if project performed with current firm This project consisted of 4 multi-level parking structures located adjacent to the site of the new Marlins Ballpark. It also includes 60,000 square feet of retail space and an area of future residential development. RGD prepared a hardscape plaza and streetscape design, as well as planting and irrigation plans. Estimated cost of project: $95 million. e. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Capital Improvement Miscellaneous • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Services Contract, Miami Beach, FL 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE = ® Check if project performed with current firm Miscellaneous services contract for Landscape Architecture Services. Under this contract, RGD is currently preparing a plan for the rehabilitation of South Pointe Park. Estimated cost of project: $8 million. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 39 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Leon C. Chin-You Vice President 20 18 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) Wingerter Laboratories, Inc., North Miami, Florida 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) University of Technology, Kingston, Jamaica Building Inspector: State of Florida Major: Quantity Surveying and Construction Technology Water Well Contractor: State of Florida • 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations, Training,Awards,etc.) ACI, AWS,ASCE, FCPA and Licensed Demolition Contractor 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Various Publix Supermarkets (Miami-Dade& Broward Counties) 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm a. 0 P 1 P Various New and Remodeled Publix Supermarket and Greenwise Stores in the tri-county area. All special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and some geotechnical drilling and engineering. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Multi purpose Parking Garage, Miami Beach, FL 2011 b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Brand New Parking Garage, completed the Geotechnical Engineering and served as a Special Inspector and coordinated all aspects of Construction Materials Testing for the City of Miami Beach's New Parking Garage. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Auto Zone, Miami, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2013 C (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE p Check if project performed with current firm Special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and inspections and geotechnical drilling and engineering. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Walgreens Drug Stores, Miami Beach, FL 2011 d. (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm Special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and inspections and geotechnical drilling and engineering. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Chipolte, Sunrise, FL 2012 - (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm e. Special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and inspections and geotechnical drilling and engineering. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 40 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT • (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Robert H. Schuler, P.E., P.G. Geotechnical Engineer 27 13 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and Slate) Wingerter Laboratories, Inc., North Miami, Florida 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Tufts University: B.S. Civil Engineering and Geology Florida Registered Professional Engineer Florida Registered Professional Geologist 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations, Training,Awards,etc.) Threshold Inspector&Asbestos Abatement 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS • (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Publix Supermarkets(Miami-Dade& Broward Counties) 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm a. New Publix Supermarket Store, Parking Garages and Retails Stores including Greenwise Stores in the tri-county area. All special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and some geotechnical drilling and engineering. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Miami Beach Municipal Parking Garage, Miami Beach, FL 2008 2011 b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Served as Threshold and Geotechnical Engineer of Record for The City of Miami Beach New 7 Story Parking Garage. Oversaw all inspections, auger cast piles, toad tests and construction materials testing for the project. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1450 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 2007 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE NI Check if project performed with current firm c. Oversaw all Construction Materials Testing and Welding Inspections on Miami-Dade County's first Gold LEED Hi-rise building which included condominium, parking garage and roadway. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) South Miami-Dade County Cultural Arts Center, Miami, FL 2006 2011 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Q Check if project performed with current firm d. Oversaw all Construction Materials Testing,Welding and NDT Inspections on the perfroming arts complex building which included office areas, theater, parking garage and roadway. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE U Check if project performed with current firm e. STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 2 41 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 1 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION(if PROFESSIONAL SERVICES applicable) Town of Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program Golden Beach,Florida 2012 2013 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Alexander Diaz,Town Manager (305)932-0744 Town of Golden Beach g ( ) 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan focused on three major improvement areas: Town-wide Drainage Improvements-These improvements included design review,costs analysis,and recommendations based on the Town's existing stormwater master plan which includes construction inlets and culverts to collect and direct stormwater runoff to pumping stations discharging into the intracoastal waterway. Utilities Underground Relocation(electrical.telephone,cable)-These improvements included a thorough analysis of the Town's existing power system configuration,and close coordination with FPL and other utility companies in developing a conceptual plan for burying all utility transmission and distribution lines throughout the entire Town. Town-wide Streetscape&Traffic Calming-The Town's major thoroughfares and side streets were redefined and enhanced to increase public safety, and improve the quality of life and aesthetic appeal.Improvements included highlighting intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, delineating of roadways with valley edge gutters,construction of traffic splitter islands and center median with new landscaping,and new lighting. The Master Plan carefully considered the each of these with respect to feasibility,cost/benefit,and design,as well as an analysis of funding options ant scenarios,and schedule for phasing and implementation. i ' "V.1--- 4 , . tr , V . I dsA 1 ;ate. ,-. \_ ._ - At 1,.,,,; ate, — .,,,,, 0 -,.-N. . _ ,.�� i - ' illiria_pv,---""' --- 5: 111111111f Y — .f VIA."' :.. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Prime-Engineering Design and Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 42 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 2 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Old Cutler Road Improvements Cutler Bay,Florida 2011 2013 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Town of Cutler Bay Ralph Casals,Town Manager (305)234-4262 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Our company was contracted by the Town of Cutler Bay as prime consultant to design improvements for the portion of Old Cutler Road between SW 97th Avenue and SW 87th Avenue.The project consists of roadway improvements,traffic circles,pavement resurfacing,sidewalks,drainage facilities,medians,landscaping and lighting. Old Cutler Road is designated a historic roadway which required all improvements to respect the existing roadway footprint,thus limiting the modification and/or additional widening of the road. This Miami-Dade County roadway is considered an arterial collector roadway. The proposed configuration for Old Cutler Road included roundabouts at each end of the corridor for traffic calming and beautification. The 1.24 mile corridor between these two roundabouts is a two lane roadway with turn lanes,landscape medians and scramble lanes.Permitting including Miami-Dade County Public Works DERM and Town of Cutler Bay. i r 4 .1,,'"-- �j"r t...,, r- f r,< - . , -,--,-, '' h, _ J w 7 ""Mr .. am` Wig�.i I 4r, s_ 03/08/2014 °CI�l t' ' 1 t ,103, - s''' X „ A. ii=10541,1411,...■ . 4 —.-� --- -_ it _ 03/0812014 ' a,3/08)2C13 '* \, 03/08/2014 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Prime-Engineering Design and Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 43 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project) 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Zones 1&4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Zones 2&3 Reclaimed Water&Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer N/A 2009-2010 Key Biscayne,Florida 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a-PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Village of Key Biscayne John Gilbert,Village Manager (305)365-5514 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Zones 1&4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement Our firm provided engineering design services and construction administration for this project which included the construction of sanitary sewers,manholes,existing pump station upgrades and modifications,lateral connections,fire hydrants,water main replacement including valves and appurtenances,and roadway/right-of-way restoration,and other related work as shown on the plans. In addition to observing the on-going work,digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress.These pictures were then printed,labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations,effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators,Engineers,Contractor,and Owner. Zones 2&3 Reclaimed Water&Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer We provided engineering design services and construction administration for Zones 2&3,which are located West of Crandon Boulevard. The boundaries for Zones 2&3 were approximately:Harbor Drive to the West,West Mashta Drive to the South,West Heather Drive to the North,and Fernwood Road to the East. The work included the construction of sanitary sewers,manholes,pump station,lateral connections,fire hydrants,water main replacement and reclaimed water main including valves and appurtenances,and roadway right-of-way restoration,and other related work. In addition to observing the on-going work,digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress.These pictures were then printed,labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations,effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators,Engineers,Contractor,and Owner. Illw-'" --'—‘1.41111111. . t , , , r Ir"' '. i i. w 1- ,-. a ...41... AST" t e ,.:..' ..... r\\ ,rte c . :..�..� .tea.. - - - !M4 - ar 400. ,4 � VIIIAGE OF KET IMAM! ulna..vin mows r4•11111111111H10111.111111•R 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Prime-Engineering Design and Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 44 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 4 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Miami Beach Design Criteria for Sunset Island 3,Sunset Island 4,Palm PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Island,and Hibiscus Island 2013 N/A Miami Beach,Florida 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach David Martinez,P.E. (305)673-7073 Director of Capital Improvements 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) We were selected for the preparation of design-build criteria packages including design development plans. This project is a full reconstruction project of Sunset Island 3,Sunset Island 4,Palm Island,and Hibiscus Island. The scope of work includes drainage, roadway,water,sewer,landscaping,lighting,and undergrounding of utilities(FPL,ATT and Comcast). The project drainage includes permitting through Miami-Dade DERM to address the challenging quality treatment requirements. Due to the high tidal groundwater, low ground elevation and inadequete infrastructure,the residents have been subjected to flooding for years. This project provides solutions that can easily be permitted and constructed. Project includes cost estimating,maintenance of traffic,scheduling,storm water pollution prevention,permitting,and construction management. The project also includes investigation of existing utilities and evaluation of their condition as well as survey and geotechnical. We are working closely with Miami Beach Public Works,Capital Improvements and the homeowners association to fast track this project. A Master Design Build Criteria package is being developed to be used on these projects as well as other similar capital improvement projects within the City. dh .% . 400 t) • 4.00 411 20 . 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Prime-Engineering Design and Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 45 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 5 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Florida International University Central Utilities LS-1 Rehabilitation Miami,Florida 2010 2012 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Florida International University Danny Paan (305)348-4005 Director of Facilities Management 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Florida International University(FIU)owns and operates the sanitary sewer collection and transmission system at its Modesto Maidique Campus(MMC).The transmission system includes a series of smaller lift stations which pump the sewage internally.There are two primary FIU life stations which pump out of the campus into the Miami-Dade Water&Sewer Department(MDWASD) countywide system.The larger and older of these is the LS-1(Central Utilities)station,which is an older dry-pit/wet-pit style of station. The LS-1 station is located within the Central Utilities complex near the center of the Campus.It pumps through a 10"diameter force main into a 36"diameter MDWASD force main which runs along SW 117th Avenue,near the northwest corner of the campus. Over the past few years,the University has been experiencing recurring problems with the operation of the station,primarily with its inability to adequately pump against increased MDWASD pressures during certain periods.Our company was retained by FIU to determine the nature,extent and cause of these problems and to provide a design for improvements to reduce or eliminate the problems. The improvements consisted of replacing the existing triple 40HP line-shaft pumps with 45 HP dry-pit mounted submersible pumps, including all new electrical systems and controls and miscellaneous station repairs. This project was completed in conjunction with an I&I Reduction SSES Campus-wide Program. - •'ti° —soma i. t ,r `it : _sue..... --- ' „-mom './4.1 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Prime-Engineering Design and Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 46 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S N EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 6 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Village of Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and System Design Pinecrest,Florida 2008 2010 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Village of Pinecrest Yoselyn Galiano Gomez,Village Manager (305)234-2121 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project included the design of over 27 miles of watermain to complete the potable water system of the entire Village. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system and public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the extensive work and cost involved in the project. We also prepared special taxing districts to better explain the finances of the project.The two phases of construction provided potable water to over 550 properties previously connected to individual private wells.This successful project also included the implementation of a system during construction to allow each homeowner to select the best location for their new water meter. S 1: t t ; i i 1_11 1 (+. ; e\ 5 ',, _ _ 1 I : i - 4 : a.1 Tt �. a �. r A , .. tee. ,' timmail91 .,�' f , (f .tY 'Y.fi. —fir" • 1 1 t_ _. •.�. -�� anal' �rt Ate\ •'Y �/ `, �1t e M S } Y,, • t ,.ie2 t • I $ ,,,,' 'ma NM 1 . . - `r 7 t — WNW. .- e � , ;«are w 4-,1'.4. , VILLAGE OF vMECIEST MASTER , i i _ - ,,t., , , 4.„,,, _ _ . , ,..., _ =:=101.1.......1.0 ' , .4 , ' =1■10.01.1.11 AMNIA 11.........---- ...---..... ........ I PROPOSED astuD WOO OO t�l�;' [CI PLAN 05 0, 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Prime-Engineering Design and Construction Administration (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 47 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S N EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 7 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Gibson Park-Phase l&2 Miami,Florida 2011-Ongoing phase 2 2012-Phase 2 est.2015 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mark Spanioli City of Miami Director of Capital ital Im rovements (305)416-1224 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Gibson Park,located in the heart of historic Overtown,is the complete reconstruction of an existing 9.4 acre park and was designated to serve as that communities living room and front yard. The project includes a 6700 square-foot recreation building and aquatic facility with competitive and recreational swimming components.The park also includes a new artificial turf multipurpose field for baseball and football.The field incorporates covered stadium seating for 1500 patrons.Additional elements include basketball courts, picnic shelters,playground,exercise equipment and parking.This GOLD LEED Certification is Phase 1 of a multi-phase project that will eventually include a gymnasium,bowling alley and a Community Center.Our services included master planning,civil engineering and architecture design. ___ ... — �' 4 4 1". ! _ Fe % . ' i - , t i r 1 r - .a i i s.:::: -, ',,, . 401, . ,T . , . , .. , ,,.., --,...., . , 4, , - .., . _ 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Lead Designer(Design-Build Project) a Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Architecture and Engineering Design Services (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 48 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 8 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Grapeland Park Miami,Florida 2007 2008 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Recreational Design and Construction/ Joe Cerrone (954)566-3885 City of Miami Mark Spanioli (305)416-1224 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Partnered with design-build experts,Recreational Design and Construction,Inc.to transform this 10-acre,underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex site into a$20 million regional,urban park,which included a water theme park and a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. Our firm master planned and designed the City of Miami's first ever water park.It is the largest city park located in the residential neighborhood of Grapeland Heights,and has become very popular among the local residents. Residents of the Grapeland Heights community are most excited about having the first water park in the City of Miami located in their own backyard,making it possible for families to visit the park and spend time together,enjoying the outdoors.There are fun-filled activities for people of all ages,such as water aerobics,movie-nights,and holiday specific events throughout the year.Additionally,this beautiful park has vibrant colors and artwork themed with cubism art and created exclusively for the park by the world known artist Romero Britto. By providing master planning,architecture,and civil engineering design,we helped transform this 10-acre space from an underutilized and poorly planned park,into a community icon with a water theme park,an 800-seat activity facility,and a state-of-the- art baseball complex.The design of the aquatic facility includes four pools with slide play structures,as well a lazy river pool,and a recreation pool.This facility is located in a densely populated,urban neighborhood off one of Miami's major highways. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as some of the principal complaints by the stakeholders 1 as this program was developed. Due to our planning and design,the park can accommodate all required parking and is easily accessible via multi-modal transportation - — -� i�i .n :Ol1 AI t �_ .! T . -` L y..�r _,,cwt. _all ` •..� , a-'Vilit . 1. C .-' . '''', 11.111111111111111, ...aw..."%.:,..alwg- ',' lk-710) • 1 i ..‘i . I ' ---'4114.' . ria ..iii 1 .1.,„ '' ,I,,414 f-47,- I '' f:41115r jpr — . IP"qiir --... _ l f farietdro---.0.9:-Z-..,iraelp it . , 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Lead Designer(Design-Build Project) a. Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Architecture and Engineering Design Services (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 49 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 9 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvements Miami,Florida 2009 2011 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Jose Lago,PE,CFM (305)416-1252 Senior Program Manager 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Belle Meade is a 60-acre,single family,residential neighborhood located in the northeastern portion of the City of Miami adjacent to Biscayne Bay. Over the years,problems with the inadequate drainage infrastructure,tidally influenced groundwater,site elevation, and deteriorating streets created a condition of moderate to severe flooding in the area.Our company performed a drainage study and best alternative drainage solutions for the Belle Meade area.The model was run and calibrated based on existing conditions. Design iterations were then input into the system and evaluated against the City's design criteria.The final design recommendation was a 120 cfs pump station with approximately 4,000 feet of collection system. Following the study,we provided the design and permitting of the drainage and streetscape improvements encompassing several miles of road in a developed flood-prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal. Permitting included pre/post computer modeling and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. Project of me Yew Award oy Cuban American Association of Civil Engineers (CAACE) I i i m '111,7_,- tom`, t ■ is 4, ,......‘ - ?, " r►-.•i. -- 7\ II/ - - ‘IP's . lk Ill 2 , ,mss ' •t N .A t ... " w R ,, . , ie_H , Ix ii.....,:zio, , _4111141111 ..... 0 ,---lJl ....111,44 -..4' -6 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Engineer of Record (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 50 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 10 2L TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Villagewide Traffic Calming Study and Master Plan Village of Key Biscayne,Florida 2006-2014 2007-2014 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Village of Key Biscayne Jud Kurlancheek,AICP (305)365-8908 Director of Building,Zoning and Planning 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Our firm was selected by the Village of Key Biscayne to provide a Villagewide Traffic Calming Master Plan.The project involved field reviews to observe the prevailing traffic patterns within the Village,coordination of traffic data collection efforts to develop the existing Annual Daily Traffic(ADT)volumes and 85th percentile speed along the identified roadway segments,level of service analysis for the roadway segments as per the Highway Capacity Manual,recommendation for additional traffic calming devices which includes analysis of the type of device to be used(speed table,mini-roundabout,diverter island or choker)and location and preparation of guidelines for the Village of Key Biscayne to use for appraisal of traffic calming requests from residents to provide clear direction on the types of traffic calming measures to be considered and appropriate circumstances for their use.As a result of the study,various projects were completed. Implementation Projects: Crandon Boulevard:This major streetscape project involved improvements to the"Main Street"of the Village of Key Biscayne. This four-lane divided county road cuts through the heart of the community and is heavily traveled by residents,visitors to Bill Baggs State Park,and county transit buses. The road is also the most heavily traveled bicycle corridor in Miami-Dade County and has a high level of pedestrian use. The project goals achieved include improved public safety,easing of traffic congestion,traffic calming,pedestrianization,improved mass transit;and streetscape beautification. Master plan improvements included the addition of bicycle lanes;widening of sidewalks; narrowing of travel lanes;curbing the outside edges of road;tightening of curb radii;full reconstruction of intersections to create paver plazas;construction of bus shelters and bus bays;improvements to signalization systems;improvements to lighting;landscaping,and street furniture. Harbor Drive Streetscape Improvement and Roundabout:This project incorporated many traffic elements to serve both traffic calming purposes as well as improving pedestrian and vehicular use of the existing right-of-way.The project consisted of a roundabout to ease traffic flow through a highly congested area of the Village. As a main arterial for the Village,the location and design of the roundabout on Harbor Drive proved to be both efficient as well as added an aesthetic component to the area. In addition to the roundabout,an 8-ft wide continuous sidewalk with shade trees planted along both sides was constructed along the north side of Harbor Drive. The widened sidewalk allows for mixed use between both cyclists and pedestrians. The area was further enhanced by the construction of on-street designated parking. Mashta Drive Streetscape Improvements:This project involved streetscape beautification a segment of roadway with the creation of new sidewalks,pavered on-street parking areas,new crosswalks,and striping. The project connected to an existing roundabout and effectively lowered the incidents and lowered the average speed of vehicles. • 111104. •1 014 .46 _ 1� 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Engineer of Record Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Coral Gables,Florida Architectural and Engineering Services (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. 51 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 G.KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 27.ROLE IN THIS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing (From Section E, table.Place")C"under project key number for (From Section E, participation in same or similar role.) Block 12) Block 13) 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 1 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Jeffrey Crews,PE,LEED AP Project/Client Manager • • • Ramon Castello.,PE,LEED AP Principal in Charge • • • • • • • • • Terrance Glunt,PE,LEED AP QA/QC Manager • • Sean Compel,PE,LEED AP Construction Administrator • 0 0 • 0 • • • Carlos Herdocia,PE,LEED AP Civil Site Planning&Design Engineer • • Marlon Medina,PE Roadway/Drainage Engineer • • • MustafaAlbassam,PE,LEED AP Roadway/Drainage Engineer • • • Dave Clarke,PE,CFM Utility Coordinator • • • Rodrigo Rodriguez,PE Senior Environmental Engineer • • Earl Henry,EI Civil Site Planning&Designer • • • Danilo Caicedo,EI Senior Inspector • • • • • • • Fernando Vargas Inspector • • • • • • 29.EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) Town of Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program Village of Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and 1 6 Golden Beach,Florida System Design,Pinecrest,Florida Old Cutler Road Improvements Gibson Park-Phase 1&2 2 7 Cutler Bay,Florida Miami,Florida • Zones 1&4 Water Main&Sanitary Sewer 3 Replacement /Zones 2&3 Reclaimed Water&Line 8 M a Park Miami,,F Flo lorida Replacement Sanitary Sewer,Key Biscayne,Florida Miami Beach Design Criteria for Sunset Island 3, Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage 4 Sunset Island 4,Palm Island,and Hibiscus Island 9 Miami Beach,Florida Improvements,Miami,Florida 5 Florida International University Central Utilities LS-1 10 Villagewide Traffic Calming Study and Master Plan Rehabilitation,Miami,Florida Village of Key Biscayne,Florida AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 52 STANDARD FORM 330 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. As the City embarks upon the selection of firms to provide professional general engineering and architectural services,Stantec Consulting Services Inc.,would like to express our sincere desire to serve the City of Miami Beach in this important role.Our multi-talented project team includes those committed professionals who have successfully worked with many municipalities. Our local strength,knowledge,and relationships,coupled with our world-class expertise,have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients'needs in more creative and personalized ways.With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve,Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe. TEAMWORK As to staffing requirements,Stantec has an adequate number of professional engineers on staff to service your projects.We offer over 180 employees at our five South Florida offices combined.It is our policy to assign key personnel to specific clients and projects and leave them in those positions to provide better continuity and proper lines of communication. Stantec is prepared to commit personnel as needed for these projects throughout all our offices starting at the top with our assignment of Jeff Crews,PE,LEED AP as Project Manager.He will bring the full resources of the firm to bear on all assignments to ensure that the project is adequately staffed with quality personnel.We have currently completed various assignments for nearby clients and are ready to service the City in whatever assignments are required. Stantec staff prides themselves on teamwork.A significant factor in our firm's success is the ability of our professionals from all disciplines and all offices to form a cohesive unit and work together.On many occasions, working together has resulted in a professional from one office traveling to another office to interact directly with other members of the project team.This approach has been applied very successfully.Stantec routinely uses this approach,and vigorously promotes work sharing among our offices.With this teamwork approach,we seek to partner with our clients,understand their concerns and stay in touch with their needs,and respond and deliver accordingly. This partnering philosophy provides open avenues for communication,streamlines schedules,provides efficiency in design by clearly defining expectations,establishes trust through strong working relationships, and ensures that we deliver the quality professional services we seek to provide. QA/QC Stantec also has an aggressive quality control program,which is similar in nature to the plan currently implemented by the Florida Department of Transportation.However,we have modified and improved the plan to the point where we are pleased to hold one of the highest design ratings of any firm in the State of Florida.The performance rating is based on grades given for design with emphasis on percent complete versus schedule,errors and omissions,changes,overruns,accuracy of cost estimates,and actual field changes during construction. Without a proper quality control plan,this degree of thoroughness could not be attained. COMMITMENT We are committed to providing quality and cost-effective engineering to the City.To accomplish this objective,our management and quality plan considers your needs,integrates process with goal,and provides a written and clearly defined path for successful project completion. Thank you for your consideration. I.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 32.DATE CZit,114111k;.-. %!` December 1,2014 33.NAME AND TITLE Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP,Vice President 53 L SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ#2014-346-YG PART II-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS Of a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 1954 07-871-9511 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,Suite 900 a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Coral Gables Florida 33134 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE N/A Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP 7.NAME OF FIRM Qf block 2a is a branch office) 6a.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS (305)445-2900 Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. ramon.castella()stantec.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Corzo Castella Carbolic)Thompson Salman,PA(C3TS) 1988 19-235-1757 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function b.Discipline c.No.of Employees a. b.Experience c.Revenue Code (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Profile Index Number Code (see below) 02 Administrative 2305 12 A06 Airports;Terminals and Hangars 8 06 Architect 592 7 B02 Bridges 8 07 Biologist 223 0 C10 Commercial Buildings 9 12 Civil Engineer 714 4 C16 Construction Surveying 8 14 Computer Programmer 255 6 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 9 15 Construction Inspector 35 1 E03 Electrical Studies and Design 7 16 Construction Manager 263 2 E09 Environmental Impact Studies,Assess.or Statements 9 21 Electrical Engineer 421 2 Ell Environmental Planning 8 23 Environmental Engineer 556 10 Ell Environmental Remediation 10 24 Environmental Scientist 1036 1 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 10 30 Geologist 188 0 I06 Irrigation;Drainage 6 38 Land Surveyor 373 0 LO3 Landscape Architecture 8 39 Landscape Architect 178 0 RO3 Railroad;Rapid Transit 9 42 Mechanical Engineer 510 0 R11 Rivers;Canals;Waterways;Flood Control 5 47 Planner.Urban/Regional 116 3 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment and Disposal 9 48 Project Manager 365 0 S10 Surveying;Platting;Mapping Flood Plain Studies 8 57 Structural Engineer 387 9 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 7 58 Technician/Analyst 1897 14 TO3 Traffic and Transportation Engineering 10 60 Transportation Engineer 587 18 T04 Topographic Surveying and Mapping 6 62 Water Resources Engineer 109 4 WO2 Water Resources;Hydrology;Ground Water 8 Other Employees 2141 0 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 10 TOTAL 13248 93 it ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS L Less than$100,000 8. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 10 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 10 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE c_ifiv:_caavie009 D ecember 1,2014 c.NAME AND TITLE Ramon Castella,PE,LEED AP,Vice President AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 54 STANDARD FORM 330 ;1.. 'sbuciTATION'NUMBER 'If'any) ARCHITECT-JEN G:I'_NEEAR QUALIFICATIONS- RFC) #2014-346-YG PART II - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS - - _'(If a firm has.,branch offices, complete_forbeach specfic'branc_h office'seeking work.) _ 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER LONGITUDE SURVEYORS,LLC 2004 2b.STREET a.TYPE 8290 NW 64th Street 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Miami FL 33166 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE DBE,CBE. Eduardo M.Suarez 7.NAME OF FIRM(!f block 2a is a branch office) 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305-463-0912 esuarez @Iongitudefl.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index Code b.Discipline Code b.Experience Number (see below) (1)FIRM (2) BRANCH 02 Administrative 3 C16 Control Surveying 1 08 CADD Technician 4 L02 Land Surveying 3 38 Land Surveyor 3 S10 Surveying;Platting;Mapping 58 Field Technician 13 T04 Topographic Survey&Mapping Other Employees Total 23 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM 1. Less Than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million FOR LAST 3 YEARS 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) a. Federal Work 0 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b. Non-Federal Work 4 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 4 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 1g.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE *le foregoing is a statement of facts. a. SIGNATURE d,o ' 1 ,JON 1 nt . , b. DATE c. NAME AND TITLE: Edaurdo M.Suarez,President AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(112004)PART II 55 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ#2014-346-YG PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(or branch office)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER Rosenberg Gardner Design 1983 n/a 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 17670 N.W.78`"Ave.,Suite 214 a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE S Corporation Miami Florida 33015 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE CBE&SBE Ken Gardner,President 7.NAME OF FIRM(if block 2a is a branch office) 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 8c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305-392-1016 _ ken @rosenberggardner.com _ 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(if any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER Rosenberg Design Group _ 1983 _ n/a 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a. b.Discipline c.No.of a. b.Experience c.Revenue Functlo employees Profile Index Number (1) (2) Code (see below) Code FIRM BRAN CH 02 Administrative 1 C10 Commercial Building,Shopping Centers 3 08 CADO Technician 1 E02 Education Facilities,Classrooms 1 39 Landscape Architect 2 G01 Garages,Vehicle Facilities,Parking Decks 2 H09 Hospital&Medical Facilities 1 H10 Hotels,Motels 1 H11 Housing(Residential,Apartments,Condominiums 2 101 Industrial Buildings 1 108 Irrigation,Drainage 2 L03 Landscape Architecture 4 L06 Lighting 1 001 Office Buildings,Industrial Parks 1 P06 Planning(Site,Installation,and Project) 1 P08 Prisons&Correctional Facilities 1 P13 Public Safety Facilities 2 S11 Sustainable Design 3 W01 Warehouse&Depots 1 Total 4 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM _ FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less that$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 0 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million b.Non-Federal Work 4 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 4 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing Is a statement of facts. a.SIG TURE b.DATE " IV/ pi c.N E ND / I K:, card ; ,President AUTHO IZE FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION I STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 6 56 ® �± p �+ 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART II -GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER WINGERTER LABORATORIES, INC. 1949 044025740 2b.STREET 5. OWNERSHIP 1820 NE 144th Street a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE "C"Corporation North Miami FL 33181 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE SBE/WBE Jill Wingerter Chin-You President 7.NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office) 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305-944-3401 Jill @wingerterlab.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (If any) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index Code b.Discipline b.Experience Number (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) 27 Foundation/Geotechnical PE 1 T02 Testing& Inspection Svc. 5 30 Geologist-PG 1 E09 Environmental Impact Studies 1 23 Environmental Engineer 1 E13 Environmental Testing 1 12 Civil Engineer 1 S03 Seismic Designs& Studies 1 15 Construction Inspector-BN 3 S09 Structural Design 2 53 Scheduler 1 48 Project Manager 2 il . 58 Technician/Analysist 10 02 Administrative 4 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 1 Other Employees Total 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,00 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a. Federal Work 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b. Non-Federal Work 5 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 5 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. L. a.SIGN TURF- b.DATE e-�_ 11/25/2014 c.NikrI AND TITLE Jill lAi ngerter Chin-You President AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 6 57 I Stantec Tab 3 MIAMIBEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specalized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" De>igr..vith ommtn:ity in mind Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-34 -YG APPROACH &METHODOLOGY Our inventive and collaborative approach to problem solving A. Project Implementation helps bring big ideas to life. Stantec has assembled a team with the skills,vision,experience, and resources to provide the City with the highest level of ,-�,y Ff j�l ,' �F 7) professional services in consultation,design,permitting,ands. �l���� construction administration. - . The proposed professionals will have immediate access to the - - - - depth of knowledge and resources of all members comprising ° a ' the Stantec team.This in addition to the team's prior City 1 4‘ .. project experience,will provide a high level of service and other ;/ / l benefits evident during project planning,permitting,and design aspects of all City ty projects.Through effective project i' management,the Stantec team expects the completion of all . l projects within time and budget constraints.The proposed y team will produce and deliver quality engineering plans,specifications,and contract documents while maintaining clear communication to meet or exceed all of the City's requirements. Project Communications Ongoing communication between the client and consultant team is integral to a successful project.As the design process is developed and implemented,the scope and requirements of the project will be evaluated to make certain the needs of the City are clearly defined.Procedures that foster effective communications will be used throughout the project,including the development of detailed work plans and scheduled progress reports,which will report the work to date and will help identify any potential problems and resolutions.All documents on project status will be submitted to the City for review and discussion,and the City will also have access to a designated point of contact. Project Execution The design process will begin with a kick-off meeting with City staff,the project manager,and the design team.The scope of the project will be discussed,and critical factors and other issues specific to the project will be addressed.Based on the size and scope of the project,Stantec will produce a preliminary design report and review documents at the 30%,60%,90%,and 100%complete levels,including opinions of probable construction costs.At each stage,the project manager will meet with City staff to review the progress of the project and make adjustments based on their input. Following the completion and approval of the final design,Stantec will,at the direction of the City,prepare contract documents and assist in the bidding process,and construction compliance/monitoring including close-out documents.Stantec will also coordinate the project construction phase with the assistance of its subconsultants(see attached organization chart)by advising the City and providing project management through observations,monitoring,and related activities during the construction phase. Staff Continuity- Contract Managers and Key Personnel Stantec and its proposed subconsultants offer the City a project team skilled and efficient in providing the professional and technical expertise required for the planning,design,permitting,and construction oversight on all City projects.Stantec will select each of the proposed team members based on their particular expertise and the services areas identified in any City Request for Proposal.Additionally,to provide continuity and consistency,Stantec has included team members who are currently working,and have previously worked,on City projects.This will result in immediate productivity and will reduce or eliminate any learning curve. 58 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 20 i 4- , YG Single Point of Control Stantec designates an experienced professional as the single point of control.This professional is one who has proven City of Miami Beach expertise in providing exceptional quality service to clients. Also essential is this individual's basic understanding of the ' cipa in Charge full range of professional services that the client will require. Ramon Castella,PE.LEED AP Jeff Crews,P.E.,will serve as the Project Manager with assistance from a variety of team members as required. QA/QC Manager Complementing Mr.Crews will be Ramon Castella,P.E., Terrance Glunt,PE.LEED AP who will serve as Principal in Charge. Project/Client Manager Customized Project Team Jeffrey Crews.PE.LEED AP Task order management has always been one of Stantec's main priorities and the reason we have been successful on so Civil Engineering many continuing services contracts. Understanding that all Tie Personnel projects vary in size and complexity,we have developed an Sean Compel,PE.LEED AP efficient project management philosophy that addresses all of Carlos Herclocia.PE.LEED AP the nuances inherent in projects. The Project Manager will coordinate the work to maintain consistency and efficiency; Marlon Medina.PE.CFM share common data,concepts,and standards;and eliminate Mustafa Albassam,PE.LEED AP duplication of effort.The Project Manager will have the Dave Clarke.PE.CFM authority to schedule staff as appropriate,giving them the Rocl Rodriguez,PE ability to staff a team capable of maintaining both quality and schedule.By maintaining a close working relationship with Earl Henry.EI the City staff,Mr.Crews will have a critical role in the overall Danilo Caiceclo.EI process of all tasks,whether they are small,such as plan Fernando Vargas review,or more complex tasks,such as pump station design or permitting. Support Services Shown here is an organization chart of key members of Survey Stantec's proposed team.Resumes for key personnel, Longitude Surveyors.LLC including subconsultants,are located in Tab 2(SF 330)as Eduardo Suarez.PSM requested. Stantec has selected each of the proposed team members Landscape Architecture based on their particular expertise and the service areas Rosenberg Gardner Design identified in the City's Request for Qualifications Package. Ken Gardner,ASLA Additionally,to provide continuity and consistency,Stantec T.KiehlSemnler,RLA has included team members who are currently working,and have previously worked,on City projects.This will result in C.eot ech n ical Engineering Wingerter Laboratories.Inc. immediate productivity and will reduce/eliminate any Robert H.Schuler.PE.PG learning curve. Leon C.Chin-You Subconsultants Stantec will be using the following subconsultants on this project: Subconsultant Name Role Minority Status Rosenberg Gardner Design Landscape Architecture CBE/MSBE Longitude Surveyors Surveying&Mapping Services DBE/CBE/MSBE Wingerter Laboratories Inc. Geotechnical Services WBE 59 • Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 201 4-346-`(G B. Management Methods - Document Tracking Mr.Crews will have access to resource analysis reports that give daily detailed information on Stantec personnel working on the project.From these reports,he will be able to determine the proper allocation of resources to stay on or ahead of schedule and within budget.Mr.Crews will prepare a Project Management Plan(PMP)at the outset of the project. This PMP will include the following: • Client information • Delineation of the work performance • Contract information • Schedule and man-hour budget • Scope of work • Project organization chart • Controlling conditions&special risks to the project • Delineation of methods of communication& • Technical approach to the project documentation • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan • Listing of Codes and Standards applicable to the project The PMP will be used to thoroughly plan the execution of the project,document the plan,and communicate the plan to all project team members and sub-consultants.The PMP will assist Mr.Crews in ensuring that the project is completed on time and within budget.It will also help him monitor and minimize or eliminate scope creep.The PMP will become part of the project contract file that Mr.Crews will set up and maintain throughout the project. For effective coordination of team member assignments,we will hold internal team meetings weekly or bi- weekly,depending on the tasks performed.These meetings are open for the City's Project Manager to attend as his/her schedule permits.In all cases,minutes of these meetings are prepared and document action items and those responsible for completion.These minutes are made available upon request.At a minimum,a monthly meeting is held with the City's Project Manager to review project progress and written monthly progress reports provided at these client meetings.Clear and frequent communications is critical for a successful outcome and our Project Manager has been involved in executing similar successful projects throughout his tenure with Stantec. Schedule Controls Stantec recognizes the importance of developing and meeting schedules and budgets.In developing schedules and budgets that are practical and can be maintained to the benefit of its clients, Stantec considers several key factors: • The development of realistic timeframes with adequate review time for the client and regulatory agencies. • Weekly production team meetings to prioritize workloads. y • Building in float' at key tasks for added discussion or as • necessary,additional research to allow the project team to = _ j r resolve all issues without falling behind schedule;if no float is needed,tasks can be completed early. il • Maintenance and updates to a Critical Path Project Schedule, presented at regular progress meetings with City staff to keep _ them informed of important budgeting and scheduling milestones. At the outset of each project,Stantec's Project Manager will develop a resource-based Critical Path Schedule and project payout curve.Schedule progress will be monitored at bi-weekly project meetings with key personnel.Schedule updates will also be made anytime scope changes or critical factors occur. Closely monitoring the project schedule allows Stantec's Project Manager to make informed decisions regarding resource needs.Should conditions warrant,the Project Manager will have the company's full breadth of resources available to keep or get projects back on schedule. 60 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG Accompanying each monthly invoice,will be a progress report,current project schedule and payout curve. In addition to this monthly reporting,City's Project Manager can expect regular project updates from our Project Manager.We believe that frequent communication is key to any projects'successful outcome. Budget Controls With the initiation of each project,Stantec's Project Manager will develop,w ith the input of the team,an independent construction cost estimate. This allows Stantec to assist the City in identifying potential budget shortfalls or opportunities and clarify project scope.This cost estimate will be monitored by the project team during design development.It will be an agenda item for all team meetings ensuring that the team remains cognizant of the projects'financial constraints.This will allow for early identification of budgetary risks and will empower the City to remain in control of the projects'scope and budget.Each projects'construction cost estimate will be updated by Stantec,as necessary,and at each major milestone or deliverable. Stantec believes that Quality Assurance and Quality Control should be about more than simply verifying the accuracy and quality of the services we produce.We believe it should be a process where-by value is engineered into the project and constructability is ensured.That is why we factor into each project's schedule and budget time and resources to provide for a thorough review by senior technical staff not directly involved in the project's development.This fresh perspective from seasoned professionals can bring the City significant savings in construction costs. Selecting Stantec can also result in significant design cost savings to City.Our team's extensive experience with projects like these,our knowledge and understanding of the goal and objectives of the City and our relationships with the regulatory agencies will result in increased efficiencies.Stantec also has a proven track record of commitment to our partnership with the City.Our track record says we do what it takes to complete the project on time and budget and will not nickel and dime the City in the process.The significant collection,relevant experience of our team and the long-standing working relationships we have maintained ensure the City that waste will be minimized and production maximized. The Project Manager will draw on the project team's extensive experience in the design of all systems. Stantec will apply creative problem solving techniques developed in teams with Construction Managers and the firm's own CEI teams.Creative use of form can add interest and recreational value while maintaining and even lowering construction and maintenance costs.Likewise,creative application of technology and construction methods can provide significant savings. Work Plan/Corrective Action Plans/QA-QC ENDS PLAN Stantec aggressively pursues its commitment to quality in Strategic.Plan.Quality every deliverable and service the firm provides. Objectives Recognizing the critical importance of careful quality control,Stantec has assigned Mr.Tery Glunt,PE,a TACT DO seasoned rofessional that has no line authority is not ±Manageent Review 8 p � Amction infrastructure.Training. Initiatives.Programs actively working on the project to act as our Quality Assurance/Quality Control person. Prior to starting any task order project,an internal meeting CHECK Measurements, with key team members will be held to define roles and internal Audits 11111MilEA S responsibilities,establish realistic schedules,and clearly identify project milestones and goals.Tery Glunt,P.E.,as QA/QC leader,will maintain procedures to control and verify project scope and performance,and ensure that the project team meets project-specific criteria and requirements of regulatory agencies. 61 r Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" RFQ 2014-346-YG The following specifics will also be monitored: • Document Control-Stantec uses an electronic document records management system that tracks all documents,including non-electronic documents,by project. • Subcontracting-Stantec requires its subcontractors to identify and plan the production processes that directly affect quality and to perform these processes under controlled conditions. • Inspection and Verification/Testing-Stantec documents results for receiving incoming products, work in process,and final inspection of outgoing documents. • Nonconformance-Stantec maintains procedures to correct nonconforming work so such work is not inadvertently used or installed. • Corrective Action-Includes procedures for investigating the cause of nonconforming work,the corrective action to prevent recurrence,and methods of analysis to detect and eliminate potential causes of nonconforming work. • Training-Stantec identifies training needs and provides the training for all technical and professional personnel performing activities that affect quality. QA/QC efforts should also establish strategies for continued improvement in areas of production, scheduling,and multidisciplinary coordination.To that end,Stantec has developed a post-project evaluation summary process to assist the project manager in evaluating the positive and negative performance results of the project. Overload Management Stantec is immediately available and committed to the successful execution and delivery of any task issued under this contract.It is imperative for Stantec to demonstrate to the City that it will respond rapidly, provide ample personnel and resources,perform in a technically competent manner,and maintain complete project integrity,including services that are on time and within budget.Stantec's approach to satisfying overload scenarios is multifaceted.It starts with a focused,experienced,and available project team backed by a strong corporate work force of several hundred professionals.Should a situation arise in which additional personnel are required,Stantec and its subconsultants are committed to responding accordingly with additional personnel and resources.Again,the proposed project team will devote its time to this project on a first-priority basis. 62 r Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed-Basis" R Q 201 4-34,YG TECHNOLOGY AND AVAILABILITY Special Equipment and Abilities The following is a list of specialized equipment and software that we have available: ✓ 160 Desktop Computer Equipment - ✓ Underwater Digital Camera Customized and designed for Engineering ✓ Portable GPS units by Dell. Mobile-computer equipment with ✓ Company vehicles wireless and Bluetooth capabilities. ✓ Cellular telephones with remotely ✓ Microsoft Office Suite synchronization with exchange services, ✓ AutoCAD 3D etc. ✓ Microstation ✓ Project specific FTP sites, password- s/ GeoPack protected, limited access or public access ✓ ICPR sites, read-only or read/comment, and ✓ EaglePoint contributory social networks or blogs. ✓ Primavera Project Planner & Microsoft ✓ Full range of selected Adobe Creative Suite Project for marketing and public relations segment ✓ MathCAD and AutoTurn ✓ Corporate wide remote solutions ✓ WaterCAD, WaterGEMS, SewerCAD, and availability - Included Virtual Private HAMMER software for steady-state, real- Network for almost 50% of time and transient pipe analyses computers/users, OWA (Outlook Web ✓ ESRI GIS Software Arc Info,ArcView,ARC Access)for remotely access, MAP ✓ Full colors plotters,copiers,printers,faxes, ✓ HEC RAS scanners ✓ Digital Cameras In addition, our staff includes architects and graphic artists who develop scale models of buildings or facilities to help our Clients and the public to view how a project will look once completed. Our in-house Public Relations department creates renderings and exhibits of proposed facilities, charts of data in support of projects, and computer generated animations. The latter are particularly useful when demonstrating several phases of a project, as it progresses from start to finish, but is also useful in visualizing current as well as future conditions. I Available Staff Level I Availability ,; 100% Total Potential Staff Utilization l 80% AVAIL BILITY jl LEVEL 60% 1 1 Active Projects Overhead,Incl. non-billable projects P 40% 20% Pending i Authorization ' �Il — — _ { —l_ — ,I Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 • Active Projects _._.6pending Auth. - Overhead Total __ Available Demand Staff • • • Stantec • ..• • .•• •