Loading...
Agreement with Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. s90 K—(9. 90 b • AGREEMENT BETWEEN • 'CITY OF MIAMI BEACH : . AND BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES, INC: PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE„STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING „ c ,1. _ RESOLUTION.NO 2015-29068 1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 20 day of January , 2016 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation having its principal office at 815 Northwest 57th Avenue, Suite 335, Miami, FL 33126 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on July 8th, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015- 29068, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the 4 Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by 5 the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant(in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), 6 Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather(except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force 7 Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. 8 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with 9 respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager(Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project(as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written 10 notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with 11 Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with 12 any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of 13 Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 14 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 15 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design 16 Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the 17 City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to 18 Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over 19 the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that 20 records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14)days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement 22 for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay ' Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Brindley Pieters &Associates, Inc. 815 Northwest 57th Avenue, Suite 335 Miami, FL 33126 Attn: Brindley Pieters, P.E. Tele: (305)266-1235 Fax: (407) 830-8700 Email: bpieters @bpa-engineers.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of 26 Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the ' Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a'secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 27 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested b„ .the; respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. j ,./e• A t t e s t !' ..•��s��"N 4 1 4 M I A A 41 CI CLE' - ASf S , t, • ��i �'' /F r, Atte Ar ,' *1 '�°'�� ;' = 1 o tee /p."Asso -s, Inc. _ :INCORpf \oR,44'019'' Signature/Secret; J • e' . '" (t�' _��resid nt r APPROVED AS T. rC ' ' Brian Pieters A S 11 � Brindiey Pieters, P.E. Print Name FORM&LANGUAUb ''a�> Print Name &.FOR EXECUTION 8L City Attorney af-e Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND BRINDLEY PIETERS &ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: Brindley Pieters &Associates, Inc. 815 Northwest 57th Avenue, Suite 335 Miami, FL 33126 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered art of this Agreement. P 9 Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days. Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $X)(XXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXX)(XXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $X)(XXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 'Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector(CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or $ 94.88 Construction) 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT: • No preapproved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. 32 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29068 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., - ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., URS CORPORATION, E-SCIENCES, INC., CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC., THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC., BRINDLEY PIETERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND BCC ENGINEERING, FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; and WHEREAS, this resolution only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., third highest ranked, Zyscovich, Inc., fourth highest ranked; The Corradino Group, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1- Environmental Engineering was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; URS Corporation, second highest ranked; E-Sciences, Inc., third highest ranked, CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; GFA International, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., are tied as the sixth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., eighth highest ranked, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 2 - Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture was as follows: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., top ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 4 - Structural Engineering was as follows: Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., top ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., second highest ranked; Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., third highest ranked; Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., fifth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., sixth highest ranked, and HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the seventh highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code, which states that in the award of contracts the following, shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract; and WHEREAS, after careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, for the discipline of Structural Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this I day of u 2015. ATTEST: Al' R.fael . Granada Cit �?'. ` B. i, ilip , -vine• IcN ................ , j .p T:IAGENDA120151July1PR000RE 014'`.-YG i— siOnal Ar'!itectural and Engineering Services-Reso(Plan,Urban Design,Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).do INCORP ORATEDi •'mac 14 CHl 2 6 . APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE- &FOR EXECUTION at"-Lasi.( 1149 City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Via Resolution 2015-29041 passed and adopted June 10, 2015, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the disciplines of Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines: Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. After reviewing the submission, the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received and the City Code, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 5 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account • Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI _ City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: D 1•artment Director Assistant City Manager City - er AS EC DM , MT JL • • T:IAGEN'•00151July1PROCUREMENT\2014-'46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Sum - (Plan, Urban Design, Env Eng, t Design,Structural Eng).docx AGENDA ITEM ��� MIAMIBEACH DATE 7-g-IS- MIAMI BEA C City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, , .miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSIO %/MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of he City Comm sion FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. Commission Memorandum Accepting the.Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA(Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach For Group 1 — Planning and Urban Design Architecture, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (PLANNING&URBAN Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE DESIGNS Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 95 1 93 1 3 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 82 2 88 2 87 3 7 2 BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 79 5 78 3 88 2 10 3 ZYSCOVICH,INC. 80 4 78 3 85 4 11 4 THE CORRADINO GROUP,INC. 82 2 75 5 81 5 12 5 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 4 For Group 1 — Environmental Engineering, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services. LOW (ENVIRONMENTAL Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE ENGINEERING).. Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 99 2 94 1 4 1 URS CORPORATION 93 2 100 1 88 4 7 2 E-SCIENCES,INC. 89 4 80 4 89 2 10 3 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 92 3 88 3 87 5 11 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 5 79 6 89 2 13 5 GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 6 80 4 76 8 18 6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 82 6 79 6 83 6 18 6 CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. 61 8 57 8 80 7 23 8 For Group 2 — Interior Design and Space Planning, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional . Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (INTERIOR DESIGN 8 Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE SPACE PLANNING) Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 92 1 92 1 88 1 3 1 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS,INC. 78 2 73 2 70 2 6 2 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural.and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 5 For Group 4—Structural Engineering, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering LOW Services Oniel Jose A. Sabrina AGGREGATE (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES.INC. 100 1 94 1 94 4 6 1 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 100 1 91 3 96 2 6 1 THORNTON TOMASETTI,INC. 97 3 90 4 97 1 8 3 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 95 4 92 2 93 5 11 4 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 90 5 89 5 95 3 13 5 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 70 6 86 6 77 7 19 6 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 60 7 80 7 78 6 _ 20 7 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5)firms be awarded in each category. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code which states that in the award of contracts the following shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. After careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 6 In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. JLM/MT DM/ EC/AD/YG T:I AGENDA120151JuIy 1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Plan,Urban Design, Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).docx • ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 34 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 _ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS"(the"RFQ") NOVEMBER 24, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME.As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office III then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 &6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question#71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 /2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications". In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 I Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS° Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro• 0,(!/ I ' Denis Procurement Director MiAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS"(the"RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1.. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME.The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B—Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement'from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION.The following clause has been added to Appendix D—Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers&contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered"sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience:"It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. 1 Q2: Section Cl. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete AIE teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term,we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3—Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please p rovi de copies of all s i gn in sheets s c anned and have them sent out as a n addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together(one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning, Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GiS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting,we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. Al 1: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants. Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted.". As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULI, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section Cl. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AiCP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 II Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10/13 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A& B? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question#3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question# 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: if the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-original/11 copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as"verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers)Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. 032: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question#1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal,of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun &Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2nd underlined area a repetitive requirement of the 1st underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 12 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five(5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members'qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five(5) relevant projects, performed in the last five(5)years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm" The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer"in each firm/team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question# 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question#7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms (firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select A/E Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full NE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 8 • Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or"Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400 —Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a — it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staff's diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question#24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w!regards to"term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The"user name" is the same as the"email address": yusbeloonzalez(�miamibeachfl.gov Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e, building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question#7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS& ATKINS NORTH AMERICA,INC. LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO&ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN&ASSOCIATES 1 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL&PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI&PARTNERS,INC. RED DESIGN GR041P BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD&ASSOCIATES ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP,INC. CALVIN,GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOC INC CES CONSULTANTS,INC. SHULMAN&ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA,INC. WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason,we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question # 1 in this Addendum. Q64: In regard to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural & Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 12 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question#7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 12 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)? (what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2,#2.1 -Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format-TAB 2- Experience & Qualifications,we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I -Sections, A-C; and sections F- Example Projects; G -Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II—General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections 0-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel, to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2, #2.1 -Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under"specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design /Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A —Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled "Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A& B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category(minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix 'C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal andlor gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 , YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos. �� ' Denis Procurement Director 14 PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN SHEET OCTOBER 1 , 2014 15 trA MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI B EAC H PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement -CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelvonzalez(iimiamibeachtl.Rov ext. 6230 'RAUL 5. MASTRA?A v..oss -F 13 Ag1EgtN1 Sn6 S to-6730 sr vivAstrapcLe vossbgv'. cow, feelJDNDO LA-t'IOS M iatG Ct i NE�t21r-,6-1) INC- . e -236-6v 4%51- t IGt f is e net-aft-V.4.r .Corn J. .5 MAii t ps B60 37ot pSBGo 379 • 6pivteet.bermelioveriiti.404 • e,t\--N3 '0,-E \.,1A cw\A\ 6 eaQ,v, KA(,.\i'q co-\41 \i\I-e,'M N.u, l e tS 00\1NMI\2eam0.c s`'S x'13 1�ti�, e S��t� � 3a5--445-acO 3oS- e` i .cG-.cce2A re ��) St 1'r_e- .C,_o(vl Gip 3 e s. G/I. 3°s• Cri. - M pit4c. CC -G.Z`-t k- --70-, % 7 Q-73 MAcierbmc,e0iit. _.tM wt.:.tur.404 Fl..Gwi pia ItIAAT/A/X1 (( 1 i DfiriD/lt 1/77A/g2.e_144/Ayt /Kt/c(HG 6d■I /e "6eAdr „ Zie"• �s�" 9S(F- i ,v 6,(ry-77 7/ bf - 77P AgfeZ )E Id&to zA rdearazoziz behar-• coyrl D1.14 VEAlipri ' j 1L b r 30r 14:04G0 G4 a,t ctait4 61.1 Piot).-ALL .Lori 1St' 2-91 30.-Z..SIA. CiLp*r.,aly- rd e6courd ILL5 5 er'' i-R4a7cC.. ffoi? a rut 3 4-0,1 ccilittaci,. cfri * MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS 19?„-fee�s/7j 62_1244_127;4i l .1•L('-'(1\ CO Q SU L k 1,4 6, 3e5.L 3G Jr/L-0i° levo .6t1LA,, f1 2 3f t\A m iv\e F el-67 e_O v‘c..u , c o jin 72 0 7>_-)0 D - °a ,- ZZ 'STAN &I-LA SLA 3Dat St CAN Y\ ? 68ci lDuwv 3.o\v∎ Q SkA� L . C 1-1 3a 3 1;--Art /zr4 / rs S r�� i y e. Li S/ e__), tzeic /S c,s, RAI 461 36/ 5l11-7 s6) !A/ 4116 &orS'on 1601 e;t11 A Gordon• (nmM* Dl1 go Gb - G.0r1 I - •',y •- MtAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1,2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPAINY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel,onzalezamiaribeachfl.u.ov ext. 6230 C54 CENr2AL /,t1 : 005)44/-5 c3os344i-x494 J l/a r m Cs45r013.cam, ex f 7362 1 Jt yc-0 (30s- .77j4. 30s- (400)y S 1 v2.c ov jc s0,1,..pk�4Sa,rept rekcj,( r.,..,1 `1 y L o ) /G'�r/1c ✓6.s- "' 7 - 3 0_s t>0 -e.-/-1,1 6.2 /oaf° -)e_ '04 Lo kikN RLOs /R,JA - 4f01 .- !if-MAN D 3e,k fictiviee. •eo»1 32.Co► tit .C:r (---t5-_c ) �E FC c1.L.ttily 14:, \IV CICt ►y�'CR-i1 VO.AINI)) `fit eN au Ce.cALc),_ Tai-stAt5 S 5 _ � VA c_ita (6M-) 3 ?„ c�1 rl�c1 'tei ,mss-'1 w-64( '( (T A3< 6 A)Net.)A- • M CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1,2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CRIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel�u.onzalez(ccmiamibeacht1._ov ext. 6230 614/-14-1.a() &.c e4eLeci i 50c-L�L—� 40 MO 0 9 PI v4 (Jr/7w –&/11 Rrnec/ I 3Cc-)76:32V /.s 1166--C% IA/46)/7i S C r4,14 1 nt)IL0 3os)cb1 1 (,;°s WI-1111 ‘oe 1) (Arv‘- -padizk_ a 6626--s--51c-YA20- 33'3 f, .Sown BackAl, Cre7‘ 5 -CMS .Wr �c a)al -u(12. , %55 3W. 1C\\A W)ncu 1► ct coa 5-4-a1 s m5.i rl}.c do.446.14 e.140776.40 21 tvAme welifire :adoM -630%, 30S=692-496t_ Lcu cc.—5co ` 3�S-64R-42_33 r� - c � � r�ecrca ( I4 l At- Gam e 3os z r. eLta f a�s= 24 qt• �F•v u_4 Vts►v Ht.6444sNI t 2Nft. (/✓l f \ L My ) -167-/gt ; x/771 ti LCi� 44- er-r� -- c ,1e-s /� p 305 -G 3 MIAI\AIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) E_y ,ADDRESS PHONE# FAX# -rho s A5Der J?Difilko,r,S 5os t Spec SiTh1-W . Comm (iii- ;6*.of-hTecis-. )/7c. -27/4414-11fii 12/424--w.74. 2r � I MIAM BEACH CITY OF MIAZMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelaonzalez,ce;miamibeachfl.aov ext. 6230 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates ti Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954)435-7010 Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain & Associates (305)441-0123 Stephanie Theard BCC Engineering (305)670-2350 Kathia Dash R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (305)446-7799 Ileana Gonzalez Robayna& Associates (305) 823-9316 Natalie Lockwood, Andrews& Newman (305)444-6454 Tom Decker Woltberg Alvarez & Partners 305)666-5474 Victor Herrera NV5 (954)495-2112 Douglass Man CB&I 561.361.3148 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME NAME COMPANY NE (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Marcie Bennetham Jennifer Creed GOE Associates Daniel Goodman DEA Architects Sherry Miller Legg (305) 599-6381 Cathy O'Leary O'Leary Richards Design Associates (305) 596-6628 Stephanie Marlin Engineering (305)477-7575 Antonio Garate ALVAREZ-D[AZ &V[LLALON 786.497.1906 Jake Ozyman Haks Engineers, Architects and Land (212) 747-1997 Surveyors, P.C. Michael EAC Consulting (305) 265-5400 Shawn Stanley Consultants 786.762.4115 Mark URS Corporation (305) 262-7466 (C71 PRE-PROPOSAL SIGN- IN MEEETING SIGN IN SH EET OCTOBER 13, 2014 16 Co MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS . Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelgonzalezf(vmiami beach IL ov ext. 6230 D AA;r EtA, e/l,mot,}- ._L:--Ti i\i,ti(,,) N,EA i ;_o M ='''''c' -t-6( 'f'c 63 t el,c C'b AilA-tti `C 5 ;Y t i 24 CS<I Cl, Si0,,i ;4 L_eze()NI ,"Eal:5AL EENic,tA3E.EZ-»?c7.C.c vi EAT, ■> >c�_ c .�C JEN'L}}LC: 3C j Z } I ii 4\DZi_Hiev-r, cgs,5ca_..)np P_ /15,�c'er7 > c.:s-� t-1/z Q .f-11 A /-/AkS C ) Err)E-s e fmk . &ler &73- 9// A-c-_--c (i )._ iczc3s) 1/4„, --i-i).,. . 1,\Q-1.9,kicA C(1'( S.C_:i t( . GI S0° n k(bC(.4-Q sot-c, ey . r � �GGt�(1 G cq ,..,,,,L, Se.„LEA usf1�Jbf.�.c c-aR.v t D,,ycr`.I �5-311•l�►c �S•3°►2-+a'� fv@alseikIeaCGA O►1612-,G0tA )P.04_, .)CL-re- S4Ar\,-lam` 305 L{4524CO \jt ocA-'u->drc-e tianAec•cawl ' iv\, e( ' .,8 6.1.11 q"-1 av ^ ___P -8-- < X05' O o(L C,,, 2 d-A 0 A MI MIBEAC H CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# • (PLEASE PRE VI) E-MAIL.ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement.- CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelvonza1ezr miamibeachti.2ov ext. 6230 i A C. 1 a /9/ e•ur4ti of 3ori 7i- /O/Lk c an/A - C r p 305- 4,73 - r Kl Ce,- � ,n`cccerort«7wti�4w�r��c1-,��- ov °-7 Vantf-S5 e i 9 s1 e r 30 5 73ern', ideZ- 1/a rt534- Le�/Y7vote 7 c-e cow s � qq -`1 _,C)U\ran KobIIe t4are INciha C buYael CM& V\IkaiD eKvinwt wA.L.-_ 3o S &I S iii 7abe i e144404/. b044 cI.jsv 101 I � or trA 1 H NI L AM Ii �EAC CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel�ezonzalez amiamibeachtl.aov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovrtec 352-459-1974 lanceainnovtec.com James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn(kstla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Torn Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkski @wadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 305-567-1888 Jennv.alonso@tvlin.com Ext. 4034 Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing 561-494-7006 slbolinger@terracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 William.craven c��puretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 jpriem @gleassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters & Associates 407-830-8700 ikemp a.bpa-enizineers.com Helmut J. Mueller Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates@mail.com MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH . PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRIrT) PHONE# FAX# E-MA[L ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzunQcphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-898-1511 Iraldy Martin L[VS Associates 303-443-2933 imartin @livs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCE Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners . (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305)461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954) 435-7010 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") NOVEMBER 12,2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Micmi Becch,Florida 33139,www.miamibecchfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fox: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.. ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: { Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez , 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 ` YusbelGonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov I Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. -'f -n s rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO.4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS"(the"RFQ") OCTOBER 7,2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.publicourchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room • 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachul.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION# 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION#2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 1 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS' and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposa ti Since-' Y i 4- aenis Procurement Director • • REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMI BEACH Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG 2 MIAMI B EAC H SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications(RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently,the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]")if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2.PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three(3)year contract term, with two(2)one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the"Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the • City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed$2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed$200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected,and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design I Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346-YG 3 MIAMI BEACH The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19,2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1,2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado a miamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez,CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 2014-346-SR 4 MIAMI BEACH 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall-4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence."The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&stateID=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http:l/web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RE 2014- 6- R 5 tv'\I AM 1BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No.2011-3747, a five(5)point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369,including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14.ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFO 2014-346-SR 6 NiI AAA IBEACH twenty(120)calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications,or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility; Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or AA I AAA1 BEAC H services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer,or its officers, employees, contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race,color, religion,sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances,the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then RFQ 2014-3 6- R 8 /V iAMi BEACH B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATIONIWITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. RFQ 2014-346-SR 9 (MIAMI BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion,may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to(as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift,favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2614-346-SR 10 iv'I,`fv\IBEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically,either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays,natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability,facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture andlor Group B— Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects,provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban,and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED,ULI,AICP,APA. RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 MIAMI BEACH d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting,and Contamination Assessment,provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five(5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email,and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.comlwebapp/wcs/storeslservlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2014-346-SR 12 MIAMI BEACH TAB 3 - - Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces)and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2014-346-SR 13 AA A \A1 BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2(Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category.The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions;or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s)(using the same criteria). Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 • Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvantased Business Enter rise DBE firms. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2 Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three 3)years.See Section 4 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 • $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 _ Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 !V„\IMA I BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A 8 C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee - Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank. = 1 _3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 - Committee Total 101 100 84 Member2 Rank: 4 2 : 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 ..Member2 ::Rank • ., -.1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking'” 1 2 3 *Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A MIAMI : Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 yusbelQonzalez(a miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified service-disabled ert ed as a veteran-owned business or a sernce veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? YES an NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity ty has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 6. • • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 • • ••_ •1 • , ... • .e••••. ..• _ • • . • 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide°Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO • B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. • • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A- Page 4 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION- The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest.In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 5 • PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Re'uirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of_ , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 APPENDIX B 1"‘ A AV\ BEAcH ii o Bid " RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 '`Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of } this solittian but have decided not to respond. to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a ''Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified 3 _'so t ifcitions:b the City,� ':. , Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do do not want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B— Page 1 APPENDIX C M1AA/\ HIEf ;1:\CH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Cl.MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A—Architecture and/or Group B— Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five(5)projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2.SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air.Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes;Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering(Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems;TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages;Vehicle Maintenance Facilities;Parking Decks • Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking Lots • Interior Design;Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting(Interior, Display,Theater, etc.) • Lighting(Exterior, Streets, Memorials,Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional,Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities(Parks, Marinas,etc.) • Rehabilitation(Buildings, Structures, Facilities,etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies;OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping, GIS, and other services: o High Definition Services(HDS) o Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) o Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) o Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) o Subsurface Utility Engineering(SUE)and Underground Utility Services o These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.)with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83190) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LiDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping; Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling&Facilities • Testing &Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply,Treatment and Distribution • Zoning;Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status(particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C APPENDIX D • • h VI A I gi -• t a A \ La Special Conditions RFQ No. 2014-346-YG ' PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3)years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1)year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D— Page 1 APPENDIX E MIAMI t- E4CH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 • � � f � � �. sue AC -� i ,,I :'fn 's . a INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 —Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating "A"as to management and "Class V"as to financial strength or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 1 -Y Appendix E Page 1 RFQ 20 4 346 G g PP APPENDIX F MIAMI :IIEACH Sample Contract RFQ No. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Dri e Miami BeacM1, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE XXX)00000000 X)C XXXXXXX)CXXX)UU XX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXX>O<XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XX, a Florida XXX)(XXXXXXX having its principal office at XX)UUU<XXXXX)( XX)UUUUU<XXXXXXX(hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement(exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXX XXXXX UUUUU<" issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXX)OOCXXX . 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule"A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule"A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent(10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent(20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule"A"hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation,joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this (together Agreement 9 ( 9 with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule"A"hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, 9 surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule"A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C— Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G— Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H— Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the fir st Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Y Project 9 Y q Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants(if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award . Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule "A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant(or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 T erm: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted, whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and 9 � Y a d absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing, who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way)the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases,the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any sub-consultants(and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule"D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure)which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%)of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable ' through time sheets(and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement(excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses P Y Project. P allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of XXXXXXXX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents(referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 9 9 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents(for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys'fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's"not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: Office ic e City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: X With a copy to: • Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXXXXXXXXXXM XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX)OCX XXXX)0000(XXXXXX Attn: XXXXXXXXXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act(Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed g p d to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS C IONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shalt perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR1AGREEMENT FORMSIA&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10.doc 9 ( ) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR CONSULTANT: XXXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES I SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $ 0.00 Design Services* $XX)UUUUU( Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration** $XX)UU(XXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Historic Preservation Board/Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00 Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SCHEDULE G INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS. SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT The Consultant agrees to abide by all the required documentation of the City's Performance Information Procurement System and submit the weekly reports. , ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 M I Am I A IL 11111111LF111 Statement of Qualifications for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in WELCOME Iv I Categories Specialized Cate p g on an As-Needed Basis 4, r 3 RFQ 2014-346-YG 1 ti Group B - Engineering t' Structural Engineering Submitted by Brindley Pieters & Associates, I Miami I Florida "ee Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Table of Contents 1. COVER LETTER AND MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Table of Contents 1 1.1 Cover Letter 2 1.2 Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit 4 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 11 2. EXPERIENCE and QUALIFICATIONS 2.1 Qualifications of Firm (Form 330) 13 2.2 Organizational Chart 39 2.2 Resumes of Key Staff 40 2.3 Financial Capacity 60 3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3.1 Approach and Methodology 61 3.2 Workload 66 3.3 DBE Utilization 67 Group B—Structural Engineering I�j�� Page 1 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter Brindley Pieters&Associates, Inc. !IPA Suite 335 815 Northwest 57th Avenue Miami, Florida 33126 Y"y`' :7;f'A`" : V, 305.266.1235 www.bpa-engineers.com October 31,2014 Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 18700 Convention Center Drive 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Re: RFP 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As-Needed Basis Group B—Structural Engineering Dear Members of the Selection Committee: BPA is pleased to submit our Statement of Qualifications to the City of Miami Beach for Group B—Structural Engineering services for the Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an As-Needed Basis. We have included information in the following pages to demonstrate BPA's experience on similar projects; the qualifications of our staff; and our commitment to the City of Miami Beach to perform all work professionally and expeditiously. BPA is a certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise and Minority Business Enterprise. For more than 22 years BPA has provided professional structural and civil engineering services to an impressive list of repeat clients that includes city, county, and state agencies. In addition to the extensive structural engineering, civil engineering, transportation, drainage, and utility engineering projects our firm and staff have completed, BPA has provided consulting services for park and recreation development, building rehabilitation, roadway projects including structural design of sign structures, airfield paving, parking lot design, stormwater projects,and site development for city and county governments. Our professional staff and relevant experience included in this proposal will demonstrate that BPA has the following qualifications to complete all assignments from the City of Miami Beach. IIIDAI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 2 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements • A professional staff of experienced engineers, designers, and support staff who have successfully completed similar projects for the City of Miami Beach as well as other clients throughout Florida. • Project Managers with the resources, expertise,and determination to produce successful projects for the City. • The experience and professional judgment to provide innovative, practical, sustainable, and cost-efficient design solutions for all assignments. We trust that after reviewing our qualifications you will find that BPA provides the experience, dedication, and quality necessary to serve the City of Miami Beach. Sincerely, Brindley Pieters&Associates, Inc. Brindley Pieters, P.E. President Point of Contact Brindley Pieters, P.E., President Brindley Pieters&Associates, Inc. Suite 335 815 Northwest 57th Avenue Miami, Florida 33126 305.266.1235 Telephone 305.266.3245 Fax bpieters@bpa-engineers.com III'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 3 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.2 Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 Yusbelgonzalez a(�miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Brindley Pieters&Associates, Inc. No of Years in Business: 23 No of Years in Business Locally: 10 No of Employees: 28 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 2600 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 180 CITY: Maitland STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 32751 TELEPHONE NO.: 407.830.8700 TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: 407.830.8877 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 815 Northwest 57th Avenue, Suite 335 CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33126 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Brindley Pieters, P.E. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305.266.1235 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: bpieters @bpa-engineers.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 593057983 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 4 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals daiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest. All Proposals must disclose, in their Statement of Qualifications, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. NONE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. NONE 3. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an public sector agency? ( YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. NONE 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 6. -- - - - - - • _ -- - -- - - - - - - - . .. ..., - ... - • ••••• --the . ■. .Bureau of Labor • • ..' • r. _'• fesoluticwireleGt_AGt49.4ndek4he ■ -- - ' - - . - -- - . . . - - - - - - . . • - - •--• - . - - --- - , -•t" •" . . _ at its solc .... City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available—at III'A1 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 5 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements• .- r 1, . , . - • •-• - - -- te-the 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other' section any additional benefits not already specified.Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health ✓ ✓ Sick Leave ✓ ✓ Family Medical Leave ✓ ✓ Bereavement Leave ✓ ✓ If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached) with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. Group B—Structural Engineering 1111A 1 Page 6 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum.After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 3'/7 Addendum 6 37 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 S? Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 /7 Addendum 8 -3? Addendum 13 Addendum 4 -3? Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 sP Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. q P Group B—Structural Engineering Page 7 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the PP 9 applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation, the selection and the award process, or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer, and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only, and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties. Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 111011 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 8 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I,as an.autrion-zed agent of the Proposer,am submitting the foltcnving information as my fm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and uncenditionai acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this s icrbtion• all attachments; exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement proposer agrees to be bound to any and alt specifications, terms and conditions contained in the .solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this. soicitslion and fa4ure to amply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted;Proposer has not d-vt tged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not cottuded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal:proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is. part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Putrlic Records Laws, all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurata. "Anio of Pmcakrr's Atertorrad Rap curr,rrt r.; 1643 of Promo's AutnaTze0 Rearesertallve: rindley Pieters,P,E. President---400. 1"; , . _ , %%'� pctober3f, 2014 a State of FLORIDA ) Qn ttn�s day et +,..LL,_,2 ` ,personally :1 ) appeared before me .yr•,'itt( tv;) ig (r t7.1-.11 r-S who County of , t{G"L v '�k...,-- ) stated that(s)he is the,'i t 4;-/-1 t'l-±' of y t'i:I I��" ,e,_,L �?- r 4- +►c- a corporation,and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed_,Before me: 124.10.6. py� Notar!Public for the State of Florid My Commission Ee.pires___--O' '1 I ' igJ PATRICIA A.IiGCARMY _ Beer!chin Wssit l4_rwiirs • 114.1 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 9 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. states that the firm will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics. //6, Brindley Pieters, P.E. President Engineering Group B—Structural Engi /j/ Page 10 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.3 Qualifications Requirements State of orl a Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. is authorized under the provisions of Section 1.a2 :: ,a or doStatutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration:2.:28,'2O15 CA tic.No: Audit No: 22820150267a Certificate of Authorization 5993 State of Florida State of Florida Board of Professional Engineer$ Ikaord of Professionnol Engineers Arrrq, Iv Aueoo,'few Brindley B.Pieters,P.E. Wesley Anthony Barnes,P.E.,,,,, 1 ,is(keeled as a Professional Cntyneer mitt Olnptcr 47',Mai r Statutes 1s licensed as a Professional nrnecr u'der Chapter 471,Flarida Statutes .r,',!u,.. .:5.;9^: ? r,`s, tsp:natr,r:r:i►'. s t l w,4* 4,,4/ r-,r.:.A IAN +M 'A IA State @ 1 r da State of Florida and(1Pro essionol Engineers Board of Professional Engineers . �,tt�4t ;- i A,..,...r i v ,_A rns P.I. Peter Acel,P.E. _ .. •,,, 1�I1€:�t,g,�t a a Rra e.s ra1 -tuns ytiir t'r' apter 471,Florida 5€4ttat is ircenrcd as a Prt,!'essiona1 , sneer Ipedtrr Chapter 471.Florida Statutes GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Trevor L. Adams a LEER' ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL IIIDI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 11 Section 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements $!Iurj State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers .> irb kit. ret fiu_ � - ifi :rr GE�tY(�rqt a�_. r ti f.iraft Thomas A,Smith, P.E. , ._ .- . ar z riri erm r ~ it!kennel al a Professional i mcir under ye. s m ,.; rnr °�.uciez°""G '. d' At.' Chapter 47�,Florida Florido tore e-• E'ahlit,),2;237:x, Pi;.9i'' . MIMIP'T.pJtitJ rn 16.173 Zit_ tE1.1Urn Filfirtars,. ik s-_.'-, Licensee Details Licensee Details Licensee Information Licensee Information Name: ADAMS,WAYNE DELOY(Primary Name) Name: FIANDER,LEO F(Primary Mama) (OEM Name) (DOA Name) Main Address: 478 E ALTAMONTE DR,STE108#600 Main Address: 7353 SPOUT HILL RD ALTAMONTE SPRINGS Florida 32701 SYKESVILLE Maryland 217847539 County: SEMINOLF County: OUT OF STATE License Mailing: License Mailing: Licensetncation: Licenselocaton:. License Information License Information License Type: Professional Engineer License Type: Professional Engineer Rank: Prof Engineer Rank: Prof Engineer License Number: 63099 License Number: 13794 Status: Current,Active Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 07/15/2005 Licensure Date: Expires: 02/28/2015 Expires: 02/28/2015 Special Qualification Effective Special Qualification Effective Qualifications Qualifications avil 02/14/2005 • Group B—Structural Engineering IIPA1 Page 12 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm ARCHITECT— ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART 1—CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) PROFSSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEEIRNG SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER September 19,2014 RFQ 2014-346-YG 1 B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND TITLE Trevor Adams,P.E.,LEED AP 5. NAME OF FIRM B R INDLE Y PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC. 6. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS 305.266.1235 305.266.3245 tadams @bpa-engineers.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) z z o W a o m Q a ~ 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT a. Brindley Pieters&Associates, Inc. Suite 335 ✓ 815 Northwest 57`h Avenue IT CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Miami FL 33126 Structural Engineering b. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑ (Attached) Group B—Structural Engineering I�I Page 13 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 1 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT j 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE _ a. TOTAL gib.WITH CURRENT FIRM Y BRINDLEY PIETERS,P.E. PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE 39 22 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC. (Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Professional Engineer:Florida,Georgia,Maryland,Texas,Alabama, B.S.Civil Engineering Tennessee,North Carolina,Puerto Rico 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations—ASCE,American Public Works Association,National Society of Professional Engineers,Florida Engineering Society Awards- 2001 National Small Business Person of the year Runner-Up,2001&2000 Small Business Person of the year for No.Florida SBA District 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION if applicable) ( Pp ) Miami Beach FL 2015 n/a Q Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Principal in Charge. Overseeing the structural and civil design and permitting of the City of Miami Beach Brittany Park seawall replacement. The project includes the design of approximately 1000 LF of seawall driven parallel to the existing seawall. The elevation of the seawall was raised to meet new City of Miami Beach seawall elevation standards.The project includes permitting through DERM,ACOE,FDEP and SFWMD. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Dr.P.Phillips Orlando Performing Arts Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2010 Under Construction b Q Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Principal in Charge. Structural design of the cast in place floors of flat slab concrete at the service and rehearsal areas (70,000 square foot area) and structural design of concrete beams for the 333,000 square foot performing arts center. Estimated construction cost$240,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Continuing Structural Engineering Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) for the City of Orlando 2006 n/a - - El Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Principal in Charge. Projects included site inspection of the anchorage of the grandstand bleachers at Jones High School and providing recommendations to correct the deficiencies to meet codes; Eagle's Nest Concession Stand - provided design for removal of an interior masonry wall,installation of new doors,and the structural infill of the opening in an exterior wall. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Amway Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2008 2010 D Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Principal in Charge. Structural design of concrete floor framing systems, vertical transportation; design of interstitial framing at 380' main roof steel trusses at high roof over the arena bowl;and design of steel framing at the low roof.This project had an 8- month schedule with multiple bid packages and early construction packages. Gold LEED Certification. Construction cost $380,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Jacksonville Main Library Parking Garage PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Jacksonville FL 2004 2005 _ Q Check if project performed with current firm e (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Principal in Charge. Structural design of the 600-space parking garage with ground-level retail,which is part of the 5-story new library. Also responsible for preparing cost estimates, specifications and overseeing the construction administration and threshold inspection of the library and parking garage.Construction cost$8,000,000 111111 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 14 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 1 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE I a. TOTAL lb.WITH CURRENT FIRM TREVOR ADAMS,P.E.,_LEED AP • PROJECT MANAGER !� 27 ! 19. 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) M.S Structural Engineering Professional Engineer-Florida,Georgia,New York,Jamaica B.S.Civil Engineering 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Accreditation-LEED AP,Green Building Certification Institute Organizations-American Society of Civil Engineers,American Concrete Institute 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Pedestrian Bridges for the Shingle Creek Trail(Oak Ridge Road to PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Sand Lake Road 2014 n/a a Orlando FL l Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design of three pedestrian bridges, 14 feet wide with precast pile supported concrete abutments.The bridge spans vary from 60 feet to 120 feet.The design satisfied all applicable FDOT requirements. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Systemwide Traffic Monitoring Systems PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority 2013 2014 Orange County FL El Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design for the steel poles including drilled shaft foundations for the traffic monitoring stations. Also provided structural design capacity reviews to retrofit the existing poles for the traffic monitoring stations.Calculations and structural drawings were also provided.Responsible for providing post design services including review of shop drawings and site visits to ascertain compliance with design drawings.The project consisted of the complete site design of approximately 475 new TMS sites on OOCEA operated portions of SR 408,SR 414,SR 417,SR 429,and SR 528. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Parking Garage D and Surface Lot E PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Port of Miami 2012 2012 c El Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer. Responsible for structural design of building retrofits,steel and concrete poles in parking areas for support of CCTV camera equipment. Poles were designed to limit deflection of CCTV cameras in operation due to serviceable wind gusts and to resist failure due to ultimate wind loads for hurricanes. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Northwest Water Reclamation Facility Operations Building Wind PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Retrofit 2009 2011 d Orange County FL 0 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer. Design of the wind protection enhancements for the Operations Building.The design upgraded and provided protection for the doors and windows to resist hurricanes of 140 mph wind speeds (Category 3 on the Saffir Simpson/NOAA Scale)and to provide windborne debris missile impact resistance for this essential facility. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Master Pump Stations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orange County FL 2009 2010 El Check if project performed with current firm e (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer.Assisted with the preparation of structural plans for the rehabilitation or removal and relocation alternatives at each of the five pump station sites illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative.The plans indicated pump station arrangement and layout, existing utility locations, and property boundary information. Three alternatives were developed for each facility site.Construction cost$5,500,000 Group B—Structural Engineering I�� Page 15 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME F 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14: YEARS EXPERIENCE a. TOTAL lb.WITH CURRENT FIRM PETER ACEL,P.E. I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 36 11 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.,Miami,Florida 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) M.S.Civil Engineering(Structures) Professional Engineer B.S.Civil Engineering Florida,California 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organization-American Society of Civil Engineers 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Continuing Structural Engineering Services PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) for the City of Orlando 2006 n/a 2 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager for this 3-year continuing contract.Responsibilities included assessment of the above stage structural framing for additional loads in the Bob Carr Performing Arts Centre; performing a condition survey and structural assessment of the Jones High School Athletic Field bleachers; and structural design for the infill of an existing window and installation of a new door in an existing wall of the maintenance building at Eagles Nest Park. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Pinellas County Transit Authority Administration,Operations and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Maintenance Facility,Pinellas County,FL 2005 2006 Er Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Structural Engineer. Responsible for design of the 2-story structure having exterior tilt-up reinforced concrete walls and interior moment resisting structural steel framing as the lateral force load carrying system.The roof is designed using steel decking and first floor is reinforced concrete on floor decking, both supported by open web steel joists. Ground level is reinforced concrete slab on grade.The building plan dimensions are 210'x 100'.Construction cost$40,420,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Spec Martin Stadium Renovations PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) DeLand FL 2012 2013 Q Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer. Development of D/B criteria package for renovations to the stadium. Responsible for the preparation of the schematic design drawings defining the structural construction technology (wall material, thickness, etc.), specifications, preliminary cost estimates,and a narrative for the structural elements of the design criteria package.Construction cost$575,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Signage Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando International Airport 2006 2007 E l Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer.This D/B project was the replacement of existing passenger and vehicle wayfinding signs with new signage at the Landside Terminal. Responsible for design of the signage steel support framing structures that were of four different configurations supporting signs of uniform size.The sign structures were designed to meet current wind-load requirements and were installed at uniform intervals along the curb.Construction cost$880,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Lift Station 143 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2015 n/a 2 Check if project performed with current firm e (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design for the odor control improvements to the lift station that includes concrete pad foundation and an 8' high screen wall and 40' long foundation. Construction administration services will include reviewing structural shop drawings along with site visits to observe progress of construction. ItI'AIGroup B—Structural Engineering Page 16 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT ! 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a. TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM WAYNE ADAMS,P.E. ? STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 23 I 8 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) M.S.Civil, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Professional Engineer B.S.Civil Engineering Florida,Jamaica 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations-Member of American Society of Civil Engineers;Corporate Member Institution of Structural Engineers United Kingdom; Society of Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics,United Kingdom;Chartered Engineer,United Kingdom 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Amway Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2008 2010 0 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Structural Engineer responsible for the exterior design including 89' curtain wall support steel framing, entrance canopies at the lobby,architectural precast and metal panel support framing,cast in place concrete at the terrace,steel framed truck loading area, steel framing to pocket terraces, steel framed player's parking and practice court, and high roof gutter framing. Construction administration included shop drawing review and RFI responses.Construction cost$380,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Dr.P.Phillips Orlando Performing Arts Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2010 Under Construction 0 Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Structural Engineer. Design of the cast in place floors of flat slab concrete at the service and rehearsal areas (70,000 sf) and structural design of concrete beams for the 333,000 sf performing arts center featuring features two state-of-the-art performance halls, community theater, outdoor plaza and performance space, rehearsal rooms, administrative offices, and educational space. Estimated construction cost$240,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Orange County Convention Center Phase V PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2001 2003 0 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Structural Engineer. Design for structural steel and reinforced concrete for various areas of the 3M sf expansion. Design included 210' span trusses, cable structures, 3-dimensional skylight frames, retaining walls, concrete floor framing, steel framed exterior walls and steel composite girder pedestrian bridge.Construction administration was also provided.Construction cost$750,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Jacksonville FL 2002 2003 d D Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Structural design for the trolley station, catwalk lighting and ice rink.Construction administration included shop drawing review of reinforced concrete beams and columns,steel roof trusses,plate girders, beams and joists, precast seats,columns and rake beams, masonry and embeds for the 340,000 sf multi-purpose venue.Construction cost$130,000,000. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED CONSERV II Sludge Storage/Gas Holding Tank PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 2011 2011 0 Check if project performed with current firm e (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Conducted a detailed condition assessment of the structural components at the exterior of the digester tank cover and a condition assessment of the structural components at the interior of the sludge storage/gas holding tank. Responsible for providing a report on the structural condition of the tank and covers.A preliminary cost estimate was prepared for the repair work identified in the Condition Assessment. Group 8—Structural Engineering III'AI Page 17 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT • I 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE I a. TOTAL Ib.WITH CURRENT FIRM LEO FIANDER,P.E. I PROJECT ENGINEER 48 14 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) MS Administrative Science John Hopkins University Professional Engineer BSCE.University of New Brunswick Florida 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organization-ASCE 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Bennett Road Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando FL 1999 2003 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer. Responsible for the structural design of the extension for the pump station and wet well building;cost estimates;specifications;construction observation and reports of the structural elements;and preparation of as built drawings. Construction cost$8,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Big Tree Road PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Volusia County FL 2001 2005 0 Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer responsible for the design of box culverts along this 1-mile roadway section that included two, 12' lanes and continuous left turn lane. Designed an innovative underground storage vault system to meet water quality requirements prior to discharge into the pond. Exfiltration trenches were designed for the eastern half of the roadway,with discharge into Stevens Canal. The cross drain for Stevens Canal was upgraded to match the structures upstream and downstream of Big Tree Road.Construction cost$1,100,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED 1-95 Widening PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Broward County FL 1995 n/a ❑Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager.Oversaw the structural design for the widening of several bridges for HOV lanes for this FDOT project.Design elements included concrete slab decks,concrete prestressed AASHTO girders,concrete piers and abutments on slab or pile foundations. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Airside 2 Terminal PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orlando International Airport 1998 2000 d 0 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Structural Engineer responsible for the design for the foundations including shallow and deep footings,and concourse roof design including 100'span steel roof trusses of the gate concourse wings of the new 16 gate,350,000 SF airside terminal.Also responsible for the design of foundations,at grade ramps,trenches for the APM station at the airside.Construction cost$130,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Public Safety Building at Florida State University PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Tallahassee FL 2000 2003 0 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE e Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design of the 2-story facility for the campus police staff.The design complied with the State University System's design criteria for hurricane shelter areas and FEMA Emergency Operating Center Handbook. The building is 30,000 sf and the exterior is clad in brick and precast concrete.The building floors are concrete on metal deck on steel bar joists. Precast plank formed a pitched concrete roof to house air handling units at the roof level. Construction administration services were also provided.Construction cost$3,200,000 Group B—Structural Engineering �`I Page 18 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL 'b.WITH CURRENT FIRM WESLEY BARNES,P.E. QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINE ER! 40 t 12 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) B.S.,Civil Engineering Professional Engineer-Florida,Georgia 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations-American Society of Civil Engineers;American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Hemphill Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Atlanta GA 2008 2009 El Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Director and QA/QC for the design of upgrades to the pump station.The existing pump station has a discharge capacity of 175 MGD at 130 PSI and was upgraded to provide long-term reliability. Plans and specifications were developed for removal, disassembly, and overhaul of eight 25 MGD pumps and eight 1600 HP motors, replacement of four water-cooled VFD drives, replacement of two EIM actuators and gearboxes,which operate the 84-inch suction well effluent valves,upgrade to the existing control system,and repair leak on the existing 72-inch transmission main.Construction cost$5,000,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Marsh Creek Pump Station PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Fulton County GA 2008 2009 Q Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Principal and QA/QC.Oversaw the design to upgrade the raw sewage pump station to a capacity of 6 mgd,with ultimate expansion to 10 mgd. Project included demolition of existing wastewater reclamation center and regarding of the site. The facility is fully automated for remote operation with standby generator capable of operating the facility during power outages. Construction cost$1,750,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Danforth Road Streetscape Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Atlanta GA 2010 2012 0 Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE. Project Manager and QA/QC Supervised design for roadway and streetscape improvements, which included new full depth pavement, roadway milling and resurfacing and sidewalks. The project included the relocation of City-owned water lines and appurtenances,as well as privately-owned utilities such as gas and overhead electric facilities.Construction cost$832,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Lakewood Heights Town Center Streetscape PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Atlanta GA 2010 2013 FI Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager. Design upgrades for a 2-block streetscape improvements project; existing condition survey to determine grades; drainage study; variance application for existing light poles encroachment; prepared lighting calculations and design modifications; and updated cost estimate and specifications. Improvements included pedestrian safety features, new sidewalks, sidewalk drive aprons,ramps,curbing,site furniture,lighting,crosswalks,tree wells,and plantings.Construction cost$400,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Runway 9R-27L Expansion PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport 2011 2014 El Check if project performed with current firm e (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager and QA/QC.Oversaw validation of utilities and Intergovernmental Agreements;utilities for site preparation and NAVAIDs infrastructure, runway paving, lighting and signage, and crossfield taxiways and holdpad paving, lighting and signage; and utility relocation/protection,utility corridor plans,and specification outline for the design criteria package.Construction cost $791,000,000 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 19 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 113. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT i[ 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE 1 a. TOTAL • Ib.WITH CURRENT FIRM RANDY AUGAT 1 PROJECT ENGINEER it 26 16 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida)a 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) Bachelor of Arts Florida Certified Residential Contractor#CRC046163 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations-American Society of Civil Engineers,American Society of Highway Engineers,American Water Works Association 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach FL 2015 n/a 2 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager. Overseeing the civil and structural design and permitting of the Indian Creek seawall replacement, which includes design of approximately 1000 LF of seawall driven parallel to the existing seawall.The elevation of the seawall was raised to meet new City seawall elevation standards.The project includes permitting through DERM,ACOE,FDEP and SFWMD. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED South District Wastewater Treatment Plant Water Reclamation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Facility 2011 b Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager. Responsible for site planning and the stormwater system design. Also responsible for traffic counts on the streets surrounding the plant site to analyze future impacts from the construction and operation of the plant. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Orlando Utilities Commission Electric Duct Bank,Division Avenue PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) and South Street and Joint-use Communication Duct Bank 2008 2009 System,Division Avenue and Church Street 2 Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager. Preliminary engineering,final design,bid documents,and construction phase services for converting the existing overhead electrical utility system to an underground electrical duct bank system and a new 19-way multi-entity(City of Orlando, FDOT, Level3, AT&T and BHN) combined fiber optics communication duct bank system. Project design was delivered on a compressed schedule and featured complex underground utility engineering.Construction cost$1,864,879. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sanford Avenue Streetscape PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Sanford FL 2012 2014 Q Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Manager. Responsible for preliminary planning, civil design, and construction documents for the streetscape improvements to Sanford Avenue from 1st Street to 6th Street. Improvements included brick roadways, on-street parking, sidewalks, lighting, hardscape, street trees, and irrigation, storm sewers, site furnishings, and utility relocations.The project also included site analysis and preliminary planning, drainage design; utility relocations, ADA ramp design, signing and pavement marking plans,permitting;and construction administration.Construction cost$2,400,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED International Drive Force Main Improvements(Little Lake Bryan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Parkway to Pump Station 3597) 2013 2013 Orange County FL 0 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE e Project Manager. Preparation of construction documents for a new PVC sanitary sewer force main and conversion of existing DIP force main to a reclaimed water main. Project included construction of 4000 LF of 20", 2000 LF of 24" and 7100 LF of 30" force main and conversion to a reclaimed water main of 12,100 LF of existing 20", 24" and 30" DIP force main. Utility plans, roadway plans, MOT plans, cost estimates, project schedules, permitting, and coordination with FDOT and OOCEA for MOT was also provided.Construction cost$9,000,000 Group B—Structural Engineering ���,� Page 20 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a.'TOTAL ''b.WITH CURRENT FIRM OSCAR BERMUDEZ,E.I. I PROJECT ENGINEER 14 5 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Engineer Intern-Florida B.S.Civil Engineering Professional Engineer-Alabama 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Society of Civil Engineers 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach FL 2015 n/a 2 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Responsible for the civil design and permitting of the Indian Creek seawall replacement,which includes design of approximately 1000 LF of seawall driven parallel to the existing seawall.The elevation of the seawall was raised to meet new City seawall elevation standards.The project includes permitting through DERM,ACOE,FDEP and SFWMD. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Typical Seawall Design PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami Beach FL 2014 N/A 2 Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Responsible for preparing standard seawall details which can be provided to those who want to construct or replace a seawall along their property.The details will include general notes and three different seawall designs,depending on the existing field conditions. Each person applying for a seawall construction permit will use these typical details in order to prepare their site specific design. Due to the consistent rise in sea level, the City raised the minimum elevation for new seawalls being constructed in the City limits. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Sanford Avenue Streetscape PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Sanford FL 2012 2014 c 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Responsible for the stormwater system design and permitting through SJRWMD.Also repsonsible for the water main relocation design and permitting though FDEP for the streetscape project.Estimated consruction cost$2,400,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Pine Castle Sidewalks PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orange County,FL 2009 2010 d 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Design of 5-foot wide sidewalks for an existing subdivision with limited right-of-way and located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the SJRWMD. Since the project is for a non-vehicular path and there are no modifications to existing drainage patterns,flow conditions,and discharge points,a permit exemption was obtained.Construction cost$2,298,000 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Parking Lot PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Sunset Park Elementary School 2014 2014a e Orange County Public Schools 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of a new 76-car parking lot. The design included grading and drainage details to maintain the existing positive drainage at the site.Construction cost$276,800 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 21 III'iI Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT I 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE ii • a. TOTAL jb.WITH CURRENT FIRM THOMAS SMITH,P.E. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 40 I 14 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline) M.B.A.Management Professional Engineer B.S.Civil Engineering Florida,Georgia,Illinois 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Organizations Certifications Institute of Transportation Engineers CTQP QC Manager Intelligent Transportation Society of Florida CTQP Earthwork Construction Inspection Level 2 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Program Management Services for the Better Jacksonville PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Transportation and Road Widening Projects South and east of St. n/a 2005 Johns River 2 Check if project performed with current firm a (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Manager. Managed the construction inspection team on several Better Jacksonville roadway construction projects. In addition to the daily inspection, also responsible for processing of all construction related documents including changes to the plans, change orders, payments to the contractor, coordination with utilities, meetings and presentations, complaints resolution with the public and media questions and briefings. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Program Management Services For Seminole County PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Seminole County FL n/a 2012 O Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Project Manager.$150 million Seminole County Capital Improvement Program that includes more than 130 individual projects that include water resource facilities projects, wastewater projects, pipeline projects, solid waste projects, and planning studies and equipment purchases. Primary responsibilities were design review, bidding and administering the construction phase from preconstruction through post construction (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR MetroWest Elementary School Renovations and Addition PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orange County FL n/a 2010 D Check if project performed with current firm c (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Project Manager overseeing construction inspection staff. This project consisted of the renovation and included the addition of two new 2-story classroom buildings, addition of administrative, kitchen and dining areas. Renovations also included campus design improvements to address security and upgrading of the site utilities infrastructure.Construction cost$15,417,056. (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR Fairbanks Avenue PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Winter Park FL _ n/a 2014 O Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Project Manager for the installation of gravity sewer and force main within FDOT right-of-way along with service laterals to side streets, roadway resurfacing, installation of traffic signal mast arms, street lights, pedestrian improvements, and signing and pavement markings. Responsibilities included coordinating site activities, monitoring contractor's traffic control measures,preparation of inspection reports,and attending project construction meetings.Construction cost$5,871,790 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) -_ (2) YEAR COMPLETED Southern Regional Water Supply Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orange County FL 2010 2012 El Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Chief Engineer.Provided QA/QC and construction observation for the utility systems for a 150-acre new deep well/water treatment plant.Construction cost$42,000,000 !IPA Group B—Structural Engineering Page 22 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12. NAME ,; 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 1 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE { a. TOTAL. b.WITH CURRENT FIRM. JEFFREY LOVER 1 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 30 6 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES,INC.(Miami,Florida) 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Advanced Traffic Control Plan Design FDOT Drainage Design FDOT Trns*port AASHTO Roadside Design FDOT Traffic Control Plan Design FDOT Specification Package CTQP Earthwork Construction FDOT Traffic Engineering Fundamentals Institute of Transportation Engineering— Inspection Level 1 and 2 FDOT Value Engineering Planning and Design of Freeways and Nuclear Gauge Safety FDOT Project Management Training Modules I-IV Interchanges Hazmat Certification MicroStation/GEOPAK 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED McCulloch Road at North Tanner Road PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Orange County FL 2008 2009 a 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Responsible for the field review and inspection for construction of intersection widening and replacement of traffic signals. Construction cost$274,220 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Fairbanks Avenue PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Winter Park FL n/a 2014 2 Check if project performed with current firm b (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Inspector.Project was the installation of a gravity sewer and force main within FDOT right-of-way along with service laterals to side streets, roadway milling and resurfacing, installation of traffic signal mast arms, street lights, pedestrian improvements, and signing and pavement markings. Responsible for the construction inspection and monitoring of the contractor's activities. Additional responsibilities included coordinating site activities, monitoring the contractor's traffic control measures,preparation of inspection reports,and attending project construction meetings.Construction cost$5,871,790 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Chickasaw Trail from Florida Hospital/Wal-Mart Driveway to PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Winter Song Drive n/a 2012 c Orange County FL 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Field Review and Inspection for the widening of Chickasaw Trail over SR 408,from 2 to 4-lanes with a turn lane and new braided access ramp bridges from SR 408 EB to Chickasaw Trail and from Chickasaw Trail to WB SR 408.Construction cost$6,949,600 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED SR 408 Widening from Oxalis Drive to Chickasaw Trail,Orange PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) County FL,Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority. 2010 2012 2 Check if project performed with current firm d (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Responsible for the field review and construction inspection for the widening of Chickasaw Trail over SR 408,from 2 to 4-lanes with a turn lane and new braided access ramp bridges.Also responsible for preparation of the roadway widening and signing and pavement marking plans for the widening of Chickasaw Trail over SR 408 from 2 lanes to 4-lanes with a turn lane and new braided access ramp bridges.Construction cost$6,949,600 (1) TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED Construction Management Services for Lancaster Elementary PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) School,Orange County FL n/a 2012 e 2 Check if project performed with current firm (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Construction Inspector. Responsible for providing construction coordination, and construction administrative tasks, and construction inspection.Construction cost$13,000,000 Group B—Structural Engineering ItI'AI Page 23 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 1 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION SANFORD AVENUE STREETSCAPE SERVICES (if applicable) SANFORD,FLORIDA July 2011 to October 2014 2012 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.Tom McMacken City of Sanford ACEOM 407.843.5442 150 North Orange Avenue Suite 200 tom.mcmackenPaecom.com Orlando FL 32801 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project was the design for streetscape improvements to Sanford Avenue from 1st Street to 6th Street in downtown Sanford to improve the aesthetic, safety and pedestrian qualities of the street in order to provide brick streets, pedestrian improvements,and landscaping. BPA provided preliminary planning,civil design, and construction documents for the streetscape improvements along Sanford Avenue. BPA also provided the structural design for the seat walls, landscape walls, and the entryway feature. The improvements included new brick roadways with on-street parking,sidewalks, lighting,hardscape,street trees,and irrigation, storm sewers, site furnishings, and utility relocations. The scope of services included site analysis and preliminary planning; roadway and parking design; drainage design; utility relocations; sidewalk and ADA ramp design; signing and pavement marking plans;permitting;and construction administration. Construction cost$2,400,000 vvik's r - �Ir , r ,. �, f. - r • • loth,..\ 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural and Civil Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering „f Page 24 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 2 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION STATE ROAD 528-DALLAS MAINLINE TOLL PLAZA SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA July 2006 to 2011 December 2011 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Orlando-Orange County Expressway Mr.Jesse.Forst,P.E. Authority RS&H,Inc. 407.893.5800 Suite 800 jesse.forst @rsandh.com 1000 Legion Place Orlando FL 32801 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project encompassed the widening of the mainline roadway to provide a 50-foot median within the limits of the mainline toll plaza. New approaches and departure ramps were constructed to access the new cash lanes at the toll plaza.The new toll plaza provides four cash toll collection leans in each direction and two express E-PASS lanes in each direction, with the capacity to accommodate three express E-PASS lanes in each direction. The existing ramps at Dallas Boulevard,to and from the west were widened to accommodate new two-lane ramp plazas. BPA provided the structural design of five cantilever sign structures and six overhead span sign structures. The task was accomplished utilizing the programs issued by the Structures Design Office of the Florida Department of Transportation and covered the design of all elements of the superstructures and the drilled shafts.Signs supported by these structures consist of conventional directional type of various sizes and also of the DMS type. - - - • k 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE ItI'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 25 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 3 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION SPEC MARTIN STADIUM RENOVATION SERVICES (if applicable) DeLAND,FLORIDA February 2012 to May 2013 2012 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.John Baer,AIA City of DeLand CPH Engineers,Inc. 407.322.6841 500 West Fulton Street jbaer @cphengineers.com Sanford FL 32771 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project required the development of the design/build criteria package and professional services to assist the City during the selection process for renovations to the stadium. The project involved a new press box, training room and locker room additions. The stadium will be used by the local high school as well as Stetson University; therefore, the stadium improvements were designed to meet collegiate level demands. For this project, BPA prepared the schematic design drawings defining the basic structural construction technology of the project (wall material, thickness, etc.). BPA also prepared outline specifications, preliminary cost estimates, and a narrative for the structural elements of the design criteria package. BPA also attended the meeting for the presentation of the schematic design in a workshop session and made refinements resulting from the workshop. Construction Cost$575,000 .. . . i ' .wr -s+► 4" +416 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE BIM Group B—Structural Engineering Page 26 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 4 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION SOUTHERN REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY FACILITY SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA June 2012 to April 2014 2014 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Orange County Mr.Brad Vanlandingham Black&Veatch Corporation 407.419.3553 Suite 500 vanlandingham @bv.com 201 South Orange Avenue Orlando FL 32801 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Orange County's Southern Regional Water Supply Facility is a new water treatment plant located on 150 acres in south Orange County bounded by the Florida Turnpike, State Road 417, and Orange Avenue. The facility includes two ground storage tanks,six production wells and associated water processing facilities. BPA provided the pre-design data collection consisting of field data collection and model verification. BPA provided the overall civil engineering,site layout,sanitary sewer lift station design,entrance roads,internal roadways,parking lot,site grading and stormwater management system design,and permitting. Additional services included the design and permitting of right and left turn lanes from Orange Avenue to the site and a guarded entrance drive. BPA was also responsible for the structural design of various water treatment industrial buildings, tank foundations, bridge crane,and pipe supports. Construction Cost $42,000,000 448..., ' ,{ 1 , lip 'Ik i. . ‘,,...;;,,,, ,, . 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural and Civil Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. . (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE 1tI'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 27 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 5 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS TO MASTER PUMP STATIONS,GROUP 5 SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA February 2009 to May 2013 2013 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Orange County Mr.Kenneth M.Blanton Black&Veatch Corporation 407.419.3500 201 South Orange Avenue,Suite 500 blantonkm @bv.com Orlando FL 38201 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project involved the preparation of conceptual site plans for the rehabilitation or removal and relocation alternatives at each of the five pump station sites illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative. Design for the lift stations includes both new and rehabilitated wet wells, sites, gravity sewers systems, drainage, and coordination of utilities. The design and permitting requires a stormwater permit from FDEP. The new sites are designed to follow OCU standards for walls, ,.• . , • driveways and site components. ° � 's1t, '' i``# 1 The five projects include the following lift stations in Orange County - Pump Station 3108 K-Mart, Pump Station 3148 " ,. ri t" 7: Penney's Warehouse, Pump Station 3338 Republic Drive, Pump d =. • Station 3435 Palm Parkway, and Pump Station 3848 Meadow Woods Improvements to the pumps stations included rehabilitation of existing wet wells and relocation of pump stations; new wet well and pump; rehabilitation or replacement of valve vault; rehabilitation or replacement of upstream gravity sewer system; and electrical and SCADA upgrades. BPA provided the civil site plans,which indicated general pump station arrangement and layout,existing utility locations,and property boundary information. BPA also prepared the structural plans for the rehabilitation or removal and relocation alternatives at each of the five pump station sites illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative. Alternatives were developed for each facility site and estimates of construction costs were prepared,and a preliminary design report for the improvements at the five pump stations was prepared. Construction Cost $2,500,000 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural and Civil Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering Page 28 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 6 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION DADELAND SOUTH METRORAIL STATION SERVICES (if applicable) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA March 2013 to 2013 October 2013 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.Renaldo Borges,RA,AIA Miami-Dade County Borges+Associates 305.374.9216 Suite 1525 rborges @borgesarchitects.com 1200 Brickell Avenue Miami FL 33131 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Dadeland South is a Metrorail transfer station in the Miami suburb of Kendall, Florida at Dadeland. It is the southern terminus of the metro system. This station is located near the intersection of Dadeland Boulevard and Datran Boulevard, adjacent to South Dixie Highway(US 1). For this project BPA provided structural engineering services that included conducting an engineering review for the design of a tensil canopy replacement,a metal canopy replacement,and the bus drop off concrete deck repair. BPA also provided shop drawing review. • ti ' A__ ' t‘r I ` • 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering Page 29 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 7 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION NORTHWEST WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY PHASE II and III EXPANSION SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA October 2008 to 2014 February 2012 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.Kenneth M.Blanton Orange County Black&Veatch Corporation 407.419.3500 201 South Orange Avenue,Suite 500 blantonkm@bv.com Orlando FL 38201 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) • . The Phase III expansion included the installation of storm shutters, storm panels, hurricane screens, and the installation of replacement doors and storefront windows for the hurricane hardening at the facility. All components met the Miami-Dade County High Velocity Wind and Large Missile Impact Tests TAS 201,202 and 203. The work included the structural design for the installation of metal are overhead coil doors (roll-up shutters) at existing doors, louver vents, and "' `- fixed glass windows at the Operations Building; removal and replacement of existing aluminum-framed entrance systems, hollow metal and insulated •--•-�-� metal egress doors, and existing aluminum-framed fixed glass windows at the operations building; and removal and replacement of existing metal :.: - louvers at the operations building. �.._.. allP 0= Construction Cost rir: - $750,000 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering Page 30 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified.Complete one Section F for each project.) 8 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MEADOW WOODS WATER SUPPLY FACILITY SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA June 2012 to April N/A 2014 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.Kenneth M.Blanton Orange County Black&Veatch Corporation 407.419.3500 201 South Orange Avenue,Suite 500 blantonkm @bv.com Orlando FL 38201 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) BPA provided the civil and structural engineering services required to complete the modifications to the Meadow Woods Water Supply Facility.The Meadow Woods water supply facility will be decommissioned as a water supply facility and the two existing wells will be retrofitted with new pumps and connected to a new raw water transmission main so that the raw water from these wells can be conveyed to the new Southern Regional Water Supply Facility for treatment. The existing Meadow Woods potable water storage and pumping facilities will be converted into a reclaimed water storage and re-pump facility. Facilities to be removed include the yard piping and pads from the previously removed hydropneumatic tank,caustic building, and fluoride building. Facilities to remain include the high service pump building, engine generator, diesel fuel tank, ground storage tanks, and the wells. New well houses will be constructed at both wells. One of the well houses will be slightly larger and contain an air-conditioned space to house, PLC panels, MMIs and other l&C equipment. Site access to the well sites will be provided through a new plant entrance located off of the existing chemical delivery driveway located on the east side of Landstar Boulevard. The existing card-access, motorized plant access gate at the north entrance will be relocated to the new entrance. A new manual gate and fencing will be installed at the north entrance and fencing will be added to separate the water supply wells from the reclaimed water facility. Minor changes to site grading and cleanup of the stormwater collection and retention system are included in the documents to improve the overall drainage of the site. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1) FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural and Civil Engineering b. (1) FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1) FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE III,Al Group B—Structural Engineering Page 31 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 9 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONTINUING SERVICES—STRUCTURAL BUILDING ENVELOPE SERVICES SERVICES (if applicable) ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA November 2007 to N/A December 2010 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.Tony Robinson,RRC,LEED AP Orange County,Florida Gale Associates,Inc. 407.599.7031 160 N.Westmonte Drive tbr@gainc.com Altamonte Springs FL 32714 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Projects Marks Street Senior Center Orange County Fire And Rescue Operations Center Roofing Replacement Projects,33rd Street Buildings A, B,and D City Hall Mayor's Balcony Fire Station 72 Fire Station 54 Fire Station 41 Fire Station 30 Orange County Regional History Center Rooftop Air Handling Unit ��-- Orange County Correction Facility-Horizons Roof Replacement and i Mechanical Repairs • a Services Provided r' kii Responsibilities under this continuing services contract included 311b " r performing structural inspections of County facilities and preparing • J. - + reports of the inspections, preparing repair costs, and providing Structural design. Regional History Center 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering Page 32 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, KEY NUMBER or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 10 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED RURAL DIVERSITY HEALTHCARE CENTER PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION FLORIDA AGRICULTURE AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY SERVICES (if applicable) CRESTVIEW,FLORIDA November 2007 to December 2010 2012 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Mr.David Vincent,AIA Florida Agriculture and Mechanical IRA Architects,Inc. 850.878.7892 University 2551 Blairstone Pine Drive dvincent @jra-architects.com Tallahassee FL 32801T 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) This project was the design and renovation of this 2-story 39,200 SF facility constructed in 1937 as a manufacturing plant. The design solutions involve the restoration of the historical aspects of the r„ •building, complete demolition and redesigning the building's interior ' #t square footage into classrooms, teaching labs, and offices for the professional schools of Nursing,Allied Health Sciences and Pharmacy. - ° "'. BPA provided the structural design of the deep foundations including helical piers and micropiles on pile caps at the perimeter; chemical soil . stabilization; and structural restoration and preservation of the historic brick facade. BPA's scope of services also included the civil design construction drawings of the stormwater systems, utility connections and relocations, sidewalks, concrete pads and landings, and paving and grading work; preparing permit applications,cost estimates,and specifications;and providing construction administration. Construction Cost $7,000,000 n .° .+. y .., — tr. i Z.' Wu, adp 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. Miami,Florida Structural and Engineering b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE c. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE f. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE g. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE h. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE Group B—Structural Engineering Page 33 Section 2 , Experience and Qualifications G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL (from Section E, Block 13) (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before (from Section E, Block 12) completing table.Place"X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Brindley Pieters, PE Principal in Charge X X X X X X X X X X Trevor Adams, PE, LEED AP Project Manager X X X X X Peter Acel, PE Project Engineer X X X X X X X Wayne Adams, PE Project Engineer Leo Fiander, PE Project Engineer Randy Augat Project Engineer X X X X X X X Oscar Bermudez, El Project Engineer X X X X X Wesley Barnes, PE Quality Control/Assurance Engineer X Thomas Smith, PE Construction Management X X X Jeffrey Loyer Construction Inspector X 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(from Section F) No. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(from Section F) 1 Sanford Avenue Streetscape 6 Dadeland South Metrorail Station Sanford FL Miami-Dade County FL 2 SR 528, Dallas Mainline Toll Plaza 7 Northwest Water Reclamation Facility Orange County FL Orange County FL 3 Spec Martin Stadium Renovation 8 Meadow Woods Water Supply Facility DeLand FL Orange County FL 4 Southern Regional Water Supply Facility 9 Continuing Services—Structural Building Envelope Orange County FL Orange County FL 5 Master Pump Stations Improvements,Group 5 10 Rural Diversity Healthcare Center Orange County FL Crestview FL 11111 Group 8—Structural Engineering Page 34 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. OVERVIEW OF THE FIRM BPA is a certified MBE and DBE with offices in Miami, Maitland, and DeLand, Florida along with an office in Atlanta, Georgia. Since 1991, BPA has provided design and program and construction management services to municipal, state and federal clients in the utility, civil, structural, airport, and transportation engineering fields. BPA's staff of professionals includes registered professional engineers trained in civil, structural, drainage, and transportation disciplines, construction management and cost estimating,CAD/technical specialists, and administrative personnel. Structural Engineering services include commercial, educational, institutional, and industrial building design, bridge designs, water and wastewater plant buildings and structures. Complete design services are offered from the conceptual design through final design and construction, including threshold inspection of buildings. Our structural project managers and engineers are proficient at preparing accurate budgets, quantity take-offs, cost estimates and can assist with all phases of the project from initial preliminary planning and budget analysis through bidding and construction administration. Additionally, our staff is practiced at providing detailed engineering recommendations and inspection services during initial project planning through final construction. BPA is experienced with providing quality construction documents and project manuals, and carefully reviewing all shop drawings submittals for compliance with the Owner's requirements and the design intent. Members of the BPA team are accomplished in developing reporting systems and communication plans for construction projects, are knowledgeable in completing permit applications, and can assist in preparing grant applications. Civil Engineering services include the design of streetscape projects, utility systems, stormwater management and drainage, comprehensive drainage studies, and paving and grading. BPA provides professional services for the design and construction of residential, commercial, and industrial land development projects One of BPA's core civil engineering services include stormwater management design, hydrology and hydraulic analyses and evaluations, water and sanitary sewer infrastructure design, roadway design, airport design and site development. The firm also provides services in program and construction management. Our civil/site engineering services include site design and layout; land and master planning; programming; permitting; site acquisition; construction services; traffic impact studies; parking and circulation studies' parking area planning and design' stormwater management plans; and utility coordination and design. Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Engineering. BPA has extensive experience providing engineering design, permitting, and construction phase services for water, wastewater, and reclaimed water utility projects, as well as civil and structural engineering for projects such as roadways, stormwater drainage projects, and building sites. BPA has provided utility engineering services for pump stations, force main construction and rehabilitation, water main and reclaimed water main design and construction, alignment and corridor studies, civil and structural water and wastewater facility site design, and pump station rehabilitation projects. BPA has designed and managed projects ranging from the civil and structural design for water and sewer treatment facilities, pump stations and water, sewer and reclaimed water pipeline installations to the rehabilitation of existing residential neighborhood water and sewer systems, and utility relocations for roadway widening and construction projects. Utility Engineering. BPA has provided utility engineering services for water main, force main and reclaimed water main design and construction,facility site design and lift station rehabilitation projects.These projects range from utility relocations at airport facilities and residential neighborhoods to the design for miles of water main, force main and reuse main constructed within public rights-of-way, water storage facilities, wells, odor control systems and site development at treatment facilities. Group B—Structural Engineering �`�,� Page 35 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. Transportation Engineering. Our transportation experience includes complete planning and design documents for highways, multi-lane streets, streetscapes, limited access interchanges, and intersection improvements. Our planning and designs provide for the safe, rapid, convenient, economical, and environmentally compatible movement of people and goods. Our services include corridor studies, corridor location and roadway alignment, impact analysis, multi-modal analysis and studies, minor bridge, sign structures, culverts, retaining walls, and berms, roadway rehabilitation and design, interchange design, utility relocation coordination, roadway drainage design, streetscape design, traffic studies, traffic signal design, traffic control during construction, signing and pavement marking design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities design,and traffic calming design. Construction Management services include site inspections, documentation of work progress and reviewing pay requests. Assistance is also provided for review and coordination of construction documents, preparing cost estimates, consulting and advising on constructability issues,obtaining permits,and value engineering. Program Management. BPA has partnered with other engineering firms to provide unparalleled service in management of programs for various agencies and clients. These include the Better Jacksonville Transportation and Road Widening Projects, The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Seminole County Environmental Services Program Management, and Project Management Oversight Services for the US Department of Transportation/FTA. BPA has participated in project and consultant selection, cost analysis and cost projections, administration, construction inspection and documentation. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CAPABILITIES BPA has provided structural engineering services for educational facilities,airport terminals, industrial and commercial buildings, water and wastewater facilities, recreational and sporting facilities, and parking garages. BPA's structural project managers and engineers are proficient at preparing accurate budgets, quantity take-offs, cost estimates and can assist with all phases of the project from initial preliminary planning and budget analysis through bidding and construction administration. Additionally, our staff is practiced at providing detailed engineering recommendations and inspection services during initial project planning through final construction. BPA is experienced with providing quality construction documents and project manuals, and carefully reviewing all shop drawings submittals for compliance with the Owner's requirements and the design intent. Members of the BPA team are accomplished in developing reporting systems and communication plans for construction projects, are knowledgeable in completing permit applications, and can assist in preparing grant applications. Our structural engineering services include the following. DESIGN EVALUATIONS CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION New Construction Feasibility Studies Field Investigation of Existing Renovations and Rehabilitation Permit Evaluations Conditions Foundations Flood Plain Studies Construction Inspection Concept Designs Stormwater Modeling Shop Drawing Review Retaining Walls Alternative Analysis Certifications Roadways Zoning Revisions Substantial and Final Completion Parking Facilities Development Permitting Inspections Drainage Systems Peer Review Record Drawings Utility Systems Pay Application Review Site Development ItI'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 36 Section 2 • Experience and Qualifications H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. CONTINUING SERVICES CAPABILITIES A major component in the satisfaction of our clients is the ability to respond immediately to our clients' needs. Our ability to respond immediately is predicated on our staff having the ability to manage workloads, both current and future. BPA is committed to ensuring that our key staff is available to meet all the requirements of our clients. Having worked on many continuing services contracts over the years, BPA has an excellent record of meeting our client's needs on time and within budget. BPA's key staff are immediately available to be assigned to our client's project. It is our policy to assign personnel who have experience and knowledge of design and plan production that is consistent with our client's standards and criteria. The staff remains highly committed and responsive to ensuring quality and client satisfaction,while conforming to the budget and schedule. BPA's continuing services contract as a prime consultant include the following. • City of Miami Beach Professional A/E Services in Specialized Categories on an As-Needed Basis. Projects include review of contractor's payment for the The Lottie and Madeleine Village,civil and structural engineering services for the Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation,Typical Seawall Design,and Indian Creek Park Kayak Launch • Miami-Dade County Equitable Distribution Program Continuous Project Services • Volusia County Continuing Professional Engineering Services for Road and Bridge Projects • Florida Department of Transportation District 5 Districtwide Utility Coordination Projects • Program Management for the Better Jacksonville Transportation and Road Widening Projects • Continuing Professional Civil and Structural Engineering Services for the Orange County School Board • Continuing Professional Civil and Structural Engineering for the Volusia County Public School System • Continuing Structural Engineering Services for the City of Orlando, Florida • Project Management Oversight Services for the US Department of Transportation/FTA • City of Atlanta Annual Contract for Architectural/Engineering Services. • Major Architectural/Engineering Continuing Services Contract at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport BPA's continuing services contract as a subconsultant include the following. • City of Orlando Continuing Professional Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services • City of Orlando Continuing Wastewater Related Professional Engineering Services • City of Orlando Continuing Contract for Professional Civil Engineering Services • City of Orlando Continuing Professional Services for Landscape Architecture • City of Orlando Continuing Professional Engineering and Odor Control Consulting Services • Orange County Continuing Building Envelope Services • Master Plan Update and On-Call Airport Planning Services at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE October 31,2014 33. NAME AND TITLE Brindley Pieters, P.E., President ItI'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 37 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications ARCHITECT-ENGINEERS QUALIFICATIONS 1. SOLICITATION NUMBER(if any) PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a. FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE) NAME 3. YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. DUNS NUMBER Brindley Pieters&Associates,Inc. 1991 85-9406985 2b. STREET Suite 335 815 Northwest 57th Avenue 5. OWNERSHIP 2c. CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE a. TYPE Corporation Miami FL 33126 b. SMALL BUSINESS STATUS MBE and DBE 6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7. NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Brindley Pieters, P.E.,President 6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS b ieters b a-en ineers.com 305.266.1235 p @ p g 8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(if any) 8b.YEAR ESTABLISHED 8c. DUNS NUMBER 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.Revenue a.Profile Index Number a.Function c.No.of Employees Code b.Experience (see below) Code b.Discipline (1)Firm (2)Branch A06 Airports;Terminals and Hangars;Freight Handling 1 02 Administrative 4 3 B02 Bridges 1 08 CAD Technician 3 2 C15 Construction Management 4 12 Civil Engineer 10 6 D04 Design-Build Preparation of Requests for Proposals 1 15 Construction Inspector 1 1 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 1 16 _Construction Manager 2 1 E10 Environmental and Natural Resource Mapping 6 53 Scheduler 1 1 G01 Garages;Vehicle Maintenance Facilities;Parking Decks 2 57 Structural Engineer 4 4 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots 6 58 Technician/Analyst 1 H09 Hospitals;Health Care Facilities 1 60 _Transportation Engineer 1 1 H11 Housing(Residential,Multi-Family,Apartment,Condominium) 1 Designer 1 1 104 Intelligent Transportation Systems 1 P06 Planning(Site,Installation and Project) 3 P08 Prisons and Correctional Facilities 1 R11 Flood Control 1 SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment,and Disposal 5 S09 Structural Design;Special Structures 2 S13 Storm Water Handling and Facilities 1 T03 Traffic and Transportation Engineering 3 W02 Water Resources,Hydrology,Groundwater 2 W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution 6 Program Management 5 Total 28 20 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUES OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 5 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 7 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10.$50 million or greater 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a. SIGNATURE b. DATE „...--- l --, ,or r' e"' Y • , . - October 31,2014 c. NAME AND TITLE Brindley Pieters, P.E., President lilt' Group B—Structural Engineering Page 38 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team m Am BEACH QA/QC Engineer Project Manager Principal in Charge Wesley Barnes, PE Trevor Adams,PE, LEED AP Brindley Pieters,PE Public Involvement Structural Engineering Design Support Randy Augat Trevor Adams, PE. LEED AP Peter Acel, PE Oscar Bermudez, El Wayne Adams, PE CAD Design Leo Fiander, PE Construction Inspection Jeffrey Campbell Thomas Smith, PE Javier Lopez Jeffrey Loyer . Group B—Structural Engineering ,j®� Page 39 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications BRINDLEY PIETERS, P.E. President, Principal in Charge EXPERIENCE Mr. Pieters' career encompasses civil and structural engineering, from planning and design 39 Years through project administration and construction inspection. Since founding Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. in 1991, Mr. Pieters has remained directly involved in preparation of all plans and contract documents, schedules and project budgets for all projects, including highways, bridges, site plans,buildings, rapid transit,airports,and utility systems. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE PROJECTS Professional Engineer Lake Ashby, Volusia County FL. Project Director. Scope of work included parking lot expansion, Florida#35428 drainage design, permitting, structural design for a new boardwalk, specifications, cost estimates and construction administration. Georgia#26390 Maryland#10545 Cross Seminole Trail, Seminole County FL. Project Director overseeing the structural design and construction administration for a new restroom building on the Trail. Texas#55608 Chosewood Park, Atlanta GA. Project Director. Civil and structural design for a 50-foot span Alabama#25344 pedestrian bridge, which was designed on concrete bents with steel girders and has a treated Tennessee#108503 wood deck. Wooden handrails and cable fascia were provided to make the bridge appear to be a North Carolina#030321 suspension bridge. Nevada#19686 Shingle Creek Trail (Oak Ridge Road to Sand Lake Road), Orlando FL. Project Manager. Washington DC Responsible for the design and construction administration for the boardwalk pavilions, and #905993 bridge. Design included foundation design for the pre-fabricated bridge over the stormwater pond outfall structure. Puerto Rico#20066 Williamson Boulevard,Volusia County FL. Project Director. Design for widening a 5-mile roadway section to 4-lanes with a raised median and paved shoulders. EDUCATION B.S.Civil Engineering, Enterprise Road,Volusia County FL. Project Director. Preliminary engineering study and design for Howard University the reconstruction of 2.9 miles of a 2-lane rural roadway to a 5-lane urban roadway from 1972 Highbanks Road to Saxon Boulevard. Big Tree Road, Volusia County FL. Project Director. Roadway and drainage design for a 1-mile PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION section of Big Tree Road from Nova Road to Kenilworth Avenue.The typical section included two, American Public Works 12-foot travel lanes,a continuous left turn lane,swale drainage,and sidewalks. Association National Society of Providence Boulevard,Volusia County FL. Project Director. Roadway and drainage design for a 3- Professional Engineers lane rural roadway to a 5-lane urban roadway with curb and gutter and a closed drainage system within the existing right-of-way, signing and pavement marking plans, signalization plans, utility Florida Engineering plans, drainage report and permitting, stormwater management plan, erosion and sedimentation Society control plans,specifications,cost estimates,and Public Involvement Meeting. Tau Beta Pi(National Amway Center, Orlando FL. Principal in Charge overseeing the structural design of the concrete Engineering Honor floor framing systems,vertical transportation; design of interstitial framing at 380' main roof steel Society) trusses at high roof over the arena bowl; and design of steel framing at the low roof.This project has an extremely aggressive schedule to complete design in eight months with multiple bid packages and early construction packages. Dr. P. Phillips Orlando Performing Arts Center, Orlando FL. Principal in Charge. Structural design of cast in place floors of flat slab concrete at the service and rehearsal areas (70,000 SF) and structural design of concrete beams for the 333,000 SF performing arts center featuring two state- of-the-art performance halls, a community theater, outdoor plaza and performance space, rehearsal rooms,administrative offices,and educational space. III'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 40 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications BRINDLEY PIETERS, P.E. President, Principal in Charge PAGE 2 AWARDS PROJECTS Orange County Convention Center, Orange County FL. Principal in Charge for the Phase V Seminole County expansion.Services included the structural design and on site construction administration for the Successful Business 3,000,000 square foot convention center expansion project with responsibilities for the west side Person of the Year, steel structure,connector bridge and parts of the steel framed roof. 2008 Continuing Structural Engineering Services for the City of Orlando,FL. Principal in Charge for this Martin Luther King 3-year continuing contract. Projects included conducting site inspections and preparing repair Award,City of recommendations for various city-owned structures. Longwood,January 2007 Orange County Continuing Building Envelope Services, Orange County FL. Principal in Charge. Responsibilities under this continuing services contract included performing structural Eagle Award from the inspections and preparing reports for the following projects: Marks Street Senior Center, Orange African American County Fire and Rescue Operations Center, Mayor's Balcony at City Hall, and Orange County Fire Chamber of Commerce Stations 72,54,41,and 30. of Central Florida,2006 Pinellas County Transit Authority Administration,Operations and Maintenance Facility,Pinellas Top 25 African County, FL. Principal in Charge. Structural design of the new facility, which consists of an American Owned administration building, maintenance building/garage, warehouse, parts room, and fuel lanes. Businesses from the Facility accommodates up to 125 administrative personnel, 160 maintenance personnel, 600 bus Orlando Business drivers, and 300 buses. The design also provides for on-site parking and the new building is Journal,2002 located on a 35-acre tract. National Small Business Remote Public Parking Garage Phase I and Phase II,Tampa International Airport. This parking Person of the Year garage is a 6-story structure consisting of precast elements and provides parking for 5,500 cars. Runner-Up,2001 Construction occurs in two phases, the first phase being a garage with a 3,000-car capacity and Small Business Person the second phase for the remaining 2,500 cars. Principal in Charge overseeing the structural of the Year-State of design and production of drawings for the entry and exit ramps of this parking garage. The Florida,2001 parking facility is designed as a moment resisting reinforced concrete frame on caisson Small Business Person foundations with post tensioned floors. of the Year-North Leroy Collins Northeast Branch Library, Tallahassee FL. Principal in Charge for the design of a Florida SBA District, 14,000 square-feet, one-story building clad in brick veneer and a metal, steeply pitched roof to 2001 form large gables at entrances and drop-off canopies. The Caribbean and Dr. B. L. Perry Jr. Branch Library,Tallahassee FL. Principal in Charge for the design of this 10,000 Floridian Association square foot building,with synthetic stucco exterior, metal furring, a metal roof system and metal Award for Outstanding deck. Contributions to the Business Community of Public Safety Facility, Florida State University,Tallahassee FL. Principal in Charge overseeing the Central Florida, 2001 structural design of the two-story, 35,000 square feet facility. A special feature of the design included complying with the State University Systems design criteria for hurricane shelters and Small Business Person FEMA Emergency Operating Center Handbook. of the Year-North Florida SBA District, Southern Regional Water Supply Facility,Orange County FL. Principal in Charge.Structural design 2000 of the high service pump building. Design included deep concrete pits and encasing for the pipes and pumps. Other structures included a guardhouse, diesel fuel, and liquid oxygen storage tank supports. Bennett Road Pump Station,Orlando FL. Project Director overseeing the structural design for the pump station and wet well building; cost estimates; specifications; construction observation and reports of the structural elements; preparation of as built drawings. 111111 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 41 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications TREVOR ADAMS, P.E., LEED AP Project Manager EXPERIENCE Mr. Adams' experience is in structural engineering for commercial, industrial, and residential 27 Years structures along with arenas, convention centers, airport terminals, parking structures, schools, and bus terminals. His areas of expertise in structural systems include reinforced concrete, steel, wood, precast, post tensioned concrete, pan joist floors, tilt up concrete, piled foundations, sheetpiling, and wind and earthquake resistant design. His experience also includes project management, preparation and review of plans, contract documents, quality control, schedules, budgets, construction management,and design/build delivery. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE PROJECTS Professional Engineer Shingle Creek Trail (Oak Ridge Road to Sand Lake Road), Orlando FL. Structural Engineer Florida#46305 responsible for the structural design of three pedestrian bridges, 14 feet wide with precast pile Georgia#PE028417 supported concrete abutments. The bridge spans vary from 60 feet to 120 feet.The design satisfied Jamaica#01:06/0158 all applicable FDOT requirements. Cross Seminole Trail Phase 1, Seminole County FL. Structural Engineer. Responsible for design of masonry wall and wood framed roof pavilions and restrooms for the park and rest areas for this Y P p EDUCATION project. The structures were part of landscaping and facilities improvements for the trail and M.Eng.Cornell sensitive wetlands University(Structural) 1986 Turkey Lake Park,Orlando FL.Structural Engineer. Responsible for the inspection and construction documents for the repair of the pier resulting from hurricane damage.The structure is 200'long,8' B.S.C.E. University of wide pier and boardwalk.The assessment included investigation of the wood pilings and decking. the West Indies(Civil) Langford Park, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Responsible for the inspection and repair 1982 recommendations for the pedestrian bridge and boardwalks following hurricane damage. Recommendations included replacement of failed cables for a cable stayed pedestrian bridge, and repair to abutments and surrounding piles,replacement and repair of damaged wood deck,and piles CERTIFICATION for boardwalks. LEED AP Lake Eola Park, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Located in downtown Orlando and situated on 43- acres, Lake Eola Park features wide pedestrian trails and sidewalks, a .9-mile loop around the lake, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION playground, café, and the Walt Disney Amphitheatre. Responsible for the structural design of American Society of bridges,promenade deck and lookout deck. Civil Engineers Amway Center, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer responsible for design of concrete floor framing American Concrete systems, vertical transportation; design of interstitial framing at 380' main roof steel trusses at high Institute roof over the arena bowl; and design of steel framing at the low roof.This project had an aggressive 8-month schedule with multiple bid packages and early construction packages. Orange County Continuing Building Envelope Services, Orange County FL. Structural Engineer. Responsibilities under this continuing services contract included performing structural inspections and preparing reports for the Mayor's Balcony at City Hall and Orange County Fire Stations 72, 54, 41,and 30. Baseball Grounds of Jacksonville, Jacksonville FL. Project Manager for the structural design of the 64-foot tall, 3-story building with a gabled roof designed to accommodate 9,000 for Minor League Baseball. Also responsible for modifying design while maintaining the schedule during construction and performing value engineering changes to control costs. This project was construction management delivered with multiple bid packages for the aggressive schedule. Jacksonville Veterans Arena, Jacksonville FL. This new arena is a multi-purpose public assembly venue with seating capacities range from 12,000 for sporting events to 15,000 for concerts. Project Manager for the structural design of the arena scoreboards and restrooms, adjacent Trolley Station, and construction administration. 1111.1 Group B—Structural Engineering Page 42 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications TREVOR ADAMS, P.E., LEED AP Project Manager Page 2 PROJECTS Jacksonville Main Library Parking Garage, Jacksonville FL. Project Manager responsible for the structural design of the 600-space parking garage with ground-level retail, which is part of the five- story new library. Also responsible for preparing cost estimates, specifications and overseeing the construction administration and threshold inspection of the library and parking garage. Economy Parking Garage at Tampa International Airport.Structural Engineer. Performed the review of shop drawings during construction for the stair towers and exterior walls for the 6-level precast and post tensioned concrete parking garage that accommodates 5,500 cars Fire Station 22,Atlanta GA.Structural Engineer.Provided the structural design for the 2-story, 14,000 sf fire station with a floor slab design for H-20 truck loading. Structural input for LEED included selection of sustainable construction materials, vegetative roof structural design, and support for architectural and MEP sustainable design features. Administration Building at Orlando International Airport. Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design of a new two-story 9,000 SF administration building. Orange County Convention Center West Building Roof Replacement. Structural Engineer responsible for site visits, review of as built documents, and analyzing and evaluating the existing roof structure in order to meet increased wind loading and recommend repairs. Leroy Collins Northeast Branch Library, Tallahassee FL. Project Manager. Design of a 14,000 SF, 1- story building framed in structural steel with a mezzanine floor for storage. Responsible for the structural design,cost estimates,and construction administration. Dr. B. L. Perry Jr. Branch Library, Tallahassee FL. Project Manager for the design of this 10,000 SF building with synthetic stucco exterior, metal furring, a metal roof system and metal deck. Responsible for the structural engineering design and construction administration. Pinellas County Transit Authority Operations and Maintenance Facilities. Project Manager. Responsible for the structural design of the 2-story 75,000 SF maintenance facility and 80,000 SF facility for operations.Also responsible for project budget and cost estimates. Lake Nona Pump Station, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer responsible for the design, specifications and construction phase services for the reinforced concrete building. Bennett Road Force Main and Pump Station, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Expansion of the existing wastewater bypass facility to include addition of 25' wet wells for new submersible pumps. The structure required modifications for aeration channel area, existing influent/effluent chambers and removal and replacement of existing roof. Adams Drive Culvert, Atlanta GA. Structural Engineer. Performed structural analysis and design of the Adams Drive replacement culvert. The project consisted of replacing in-kind the existing quadruple 10' x 9' cast in place concrete 90' culvert with a new cast in place structure. The design included wingwalls and inlet and outlet aprons. Southwest Water Mains,Atlanta GA Project Engineer. Design of structural elements associated with the six-mile segment of 54-inch pipeline. Performed preliminary design of a pipeline bridge over a railroad track and design of large cast in place vault structures. Northwest Water Reclamation Facility Operations Building Wind Retrofit, Orange County FL. Structural Engineer. Design of the wind protection enhancements for the Operations Building. The design upgraded and provided protection for the doors and windows to resist hurricanes of 140 mph wind speeds. Group B—Structural Engineering l�I Page 43 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications PETER ACEL, P.E. Structural Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Acel's thirty-six years of experience as a structural engineer comprises a broad range of 36 Years structural design systems, materials,and delivery methods. He has been involved in a wide variety of g Y � � rY Y projects including many with multiple bid packages and compressed schedules. His experience covers structural analysis and design of parking garages, sign structures, airline terminals, office buildings, schools, pump stations, water reclamation facilities, commercial, entertainment, institutional, and industrial facilities. His structural designs include reinforced concrete design of foundations, retaining walls and revetments, masonry, precast panel, tilt-up wall construction, structural steel, loading docks,equipment supports,and platforms. EDUCATION PROJECTS M.S.Civil Engineering Shingle Creek Trail (Oak Ridge Road to Sand Lake Road),Orlando FL. Project Engineer. Responsible (Structures)-University for the structural design for the boardwalk pavilions, and bridge. Design included foundation design of California, Berkeley, for the pre-fabricated bridge over the stormwater pond outfall structure. 1976 Spec Martin Stadium Renovations, DeLand FL. Structural Engineer. This project was the development of the design/build criteria package for renovations to the stadium. Responsible for the B.S.Civil Engineering- preparation of the schematic design drawings defining the structural construction technology (wall University of California, material,thickness,etc.),specifications,preliminary cost estimates,and a narrative for the structural Berkeley 1975 elements of the design criteria package. REGISTRATION Parking Garage D and Surface Lot E, Port of Miami. Structural Engineer. Provided QA/QC of the Professional Engineer structural design for the replacement of the TOA emergency call boxes with Digital Acoustics Florida#41699 emergency call buttons,and the addition of new cameras.Also provided shop drawing review. California#28742 Continuing Structural Engineering Services for the City of Orlando. Project Manager. Responsibilities included assessment of the stage structural framing in the Bob Carr Performing Arts Centre; condition survey and structural assessment of Jones High School Athletic Field bleachers; PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION and structural design for windows and doors of the Eagles Nest Park maintenance building. American Society of Continuing Building Envelope Services for Orange County. Project Manager. Performed structural Civil Engineers inspections and prepared reports of finding for the Mayor's Balcony at City Hall, Orange County Fire Stations 72, 54, 41, and 30, Orange County Regional History Center Cooling Tower, and Orange County Correction Facility/Horizons roof replacement and mechanical repair. Continuing Building Envelope Services at Orlando International Airport. Structural Engineer. Conducted a storm damage assessment of the Airport Terminal roof and structural inspections of Airport buildings for damage resulting from a hurricane. Orange County Convention Center West Building Roof Replacement, Orange County FL. Project Manager. Site visits, review of as built documents, and analyzing and evaluating the existing roof structure in order to meet increased wind loading and recommend repairs. Concessions and Retail Renovations, Landside Terminal, Orlando International Airport. Structural Engineer.Design of the structural steel framing to facilitate changes in configuration of retail areas in the terminal. LPGA Boulevard from Jimmy Ann Drive to Nova Road, Volusia County FL. Structural Engineer. Prepared construction documents and cost estimates for the mast arm structures for the roadway widening from a 2-lane collector located within a varying right of way to a 4-lane divided roadway with two interior 12-foot lanes. SR 429/CR 437A Interchange (#429-200A), Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority. Structural Engineer responsible for the design of highway signs and support structures and foundations to withstand wind loads;calculations;design for the welding of steel and aluminum sign structure components;and soil mechanics. Group B—Structural Engineering I�,�� Page 44 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications PETER ACEL, P.E. Structural Engineer Page 2 PROJECTS SR 408 Widening from Tampa Road to Interstate 4 (#252A), Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority. 1.2-mile widening of SR 408 from 4-lanes to 6-lanes. Structural Engineer responsible for the design of highway signs and support structures and foundations to withstand wind loads; calculations; design for the welding of steel and aluminum sign structure components; and soil mechanics. Signage Improvements, Landside Terminal, Orlando International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design of signage steel support framing at both the arrival and departure terminal entrances. Design consisted of four different configurations. Lighting Improvements, Landside Terminal, Orlando International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design of overhead lighting support steel framing design for the lighting and soffit replacement in the terminal. Southern Regional Water Service Facility,Orange County FL. Structural Engineer. Design of various water treatment industrial buildings,tank foundations,bridge crane,and pipe supports. Northwest Water Reclamation Facility, Orange County FL. Engineer of Record. Design of hurricane resistant screens, shutters and associated components meeting Miami-Dade County standards. These items were designed for the operations/maintenance building and the generator enclosure located at the site. Master Pump Stations Group 5, Orange County FL. Structural Engineer. Preparation of structural plans for the rehabilitation or removal and relocation alternatives at each of the five pump station sites illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative. The plans indicated pump station arrangement and layout, existing utility locations, and property boundary information. Up to three alternatives were developed for each facility site. Lift Station 143, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer responsible for the structural design for the odor control improvements to the lift station that include concrete pad foundation and an 8' high screen wall and 40' long foundation.Construction administration services include reviewing structural shop drawings along with site visits to observe progress of construction and preparation of a construction observation report. Pinellas County Transit Authority Administration, Operations and Maintenance Facility. Structural Engineer. Design of 2-story structure with exterior tilt-up reinforced concrete walls and interior moment resisting structural steel framing as the lateral force load carrying system. The roof was designed using steel decking and first floor was reinforced concrete on floor decking, both supported by open web steel joists. Economy Parking Garage Phase 1 and II at Tampa International Airport.Structural Engineer. Design and construction drawings for the entry and exit ramps. The 6-story parking facility is designed for 5,500 cars as a moment resisting reinforced concrete frame on caisson foundations with post tensioned floors. Jacksonville Main Library Parking Garage, Jacksonville FL. Structural Engineer. Design of the stairwell concrete foundation for the 600 car,6 level parking garage. Parking Garage D and Surface Lot E, Port of Miami. Provided QA/QC of the structural design for the replacement of the TOA emergency call boxes with digital acoustics emergency call buttons, and the addition of new cameras.Also provided shop drawing review. Florida A & M University Rural Diversity Healthcare Center, Crestview FL. Engineer of Record. Responsible for structural design of the foundation for the 2-story 39,200 SF facility along with checking the contractor's approach in stabilizing the existing walls during construction. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 45 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications WAYNE ADAMS, P.E. Project Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Adams' experience is in structural engineering covering projects involving airports, arenas, 24 Years convention centers, parking structures, schools, bus terminals, marine structures, commercial structures, industrial structures, and residential structures. His areas of expertise in structural systems include reinforced concrete, steel, wood, precast, post tensioned concrete, pan joist floors,tilt up concrete, piled foundations,sheetpiling, and wind and earthquake resistant design. His experience includes preparation and review of plans, contract documents, quality control, schedules, budgets, supervision of design, and construction management, and design/build delivery. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE PROJECTS Professional Engineer Amway Center,Orlando FL.Structural Engineer. Responsible for the exterior design including 89' Florida#63099 curtain wall support steel framing, entrance canopies at the lobby, architectural precast and Jamaica metal panel support framing, cast in place concrete at the terrace, steel framed truck loading area,steel framing to pocket terraces and portions of the west side,steel framed player's parking and practice court, and high roof gutter framing. Construction administration included shop EDUCATION drawing review and RFI responses M.S.Civil 1991, Dr. P. Phillips Orlando Performing Arts Center, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Design of the Imperial College cast in place floors of flat slab concrete at the service and rehearsal areas (70,000 square foot Earthquake Engineering area)and structural design of concrete beams for the 333,000 square foot performing arts center and Structural featuring features two state-of-the-art performance halls, a community theater, outdoor plaza Dynamics and performance space, rehearsal rooms,administrative offices,and educational space. B.S.Civil Engineering Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena, Jacksonville FL. Structural Engineer. Design of trolley 1987 University of the station, areas of lighting catwalk and ice rink. Construction administration, shop drawing review West Indies of all reinforced concrete beams and columns, steel roof trusses, plate girders, beams and joists, precast seats, columns and rake beams, masonry and embeds. The 340,000 SF multi-purpose venue seats up to 16,000 including club suites with 27,000 SF of floor area. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION Baseball Grounds of Jacksonville, Jacksonville FL. Structural Engineer. Structural design to all Member of American aspects of masonry. Construction administration included shop drawing review of masonry, light Society of Civil gage steel framing and precast column, beams, walls and seating. This facility, built for the AA Engineers Minor League Jacksonville Suns, has a seating capacity of 10,000. Corporate Member Jacksonville Library Parking Garage, Jacksonville FL. Structural Engineer. Design of the Institution of Structural foundation for the 6-story 250,000 SF precast concrete parking garage with continuous cast in Engineers United place concrete foundations that took into account the existing footings to an immediately Kingdom adjacent multi story parking garage. Society of Earthquake Kernan Middle School,Jacksonville FL, Duval County Public Schools. Structural Engineer. Design and Civil Engineering of the 23,000 SF multipurpose gymnasium and administration buildings. The gymnasium design Dynamics, United featured structural steel trusses over the three indoor courts. The Design/Build delivery was Kingdom completed in two months to meet the fourteen-month delivery schedule. Chartered Engineer, J. Allen Axson Montessori Academy, Jacksonville FL, Duval County Public Schools. Structural United Kingdom Engineer. Structural design for the 25,000 SF dual purpose cafeteria/auditorium building of pre- engineered steel frame construction Orange County Convention Center Phase V, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Design for the structural steel and reinforced concrete for the 3M SF expansion. The design included 210 feet span trusses, cable structures, and 3-dimensional skylight frames. Delivery was construction management with multiple bid packages. Design included retaining walls, concrete floor framing, steel framed exterior walls and steel composite girder pedestrian bridge. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 46 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications WAYNE ADAMS, P.E. Project Engineer PAGE 2 PROJECTS Pinellas County Transit Authority Administration Operations and Maintenance Facility, Pinellas County FL. Structural Engineer. Design of the 2-story maintenance building featuring tilt up walls, composite metal floor deck on steel joists and metal roof deck on steel joists Airside Terminal E at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design and analysis of reinforced concrete pan joist floor framing and gravity frames at the boarding level. The 14-gate airside terminal has 272,000 SF in three levels and an architecturally exposed steel roof of 110 feet clear span in public areas. Project was a design/build delivery with multiple bid packages. Airside Terminal C at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design and analysis of reinforced concrete pan joist floors, two way floor framing and gravity frames at the terminal's boarding level.The 16-gate airside terminal has a 315,000 SF boarding level and a baggage handling system. Terminal Security Enhancements at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design of 35,000 SF Airside A Baggage Sortation Building consisting of conveyor and curved roof steel framing with masonry walls, the 55,000 SF Airside F Baggage Sortation Building consisting of girders up to 70-foot span housing steel baggage conveyor framing. Design tasks included design of all elements above the foundations. Assessment of in place composite steel beams and plate girders, 120-foot span for change of use as conveyor and catwalk support. Car Rental Garage at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design tasks for this 370,000 SF, 706 space parking garage included caisson design including load takedowns. Design of the cast in place concrete ramp and design of precast double T bridge girders over roadway. The rental car counter was framed out of steel with glazed curtain wall for approximately 260 feet of the landside terminal. During the construction phase, responsibilities included review of fabrication drawings for the structural design elements of the project. Economy Parking Garage, Phase 1 at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Design analysis of reinforced concrete framed entry and exit ramp structures, steel framed entry and exit canopies and administration building to the completed 3900 space post tensioned garage structure. Fabrication drawing review of all project structural elements. Economy Parking Garage, Phase 2 at Tampa International Airport. Structural Engineer. Analysis and design of retrofitted extensions to existing framed entry and exit ramp structures, precast stairs, sixth floor elevator lobby roof and wall framing and cell phone lot rest rooms to the 5600 space post tensioned garage structure to 100%construction documents CONSERV II Digester Gas Holding Tank, Orlando FL. Project Engineer. Conducted a detailed condition assessment of the structural components at the exterior of the digester tank cover and also conducted a condition assessment of the structural components at the interior of the sludge storage/gas holding tank. Responsible for providing a report on the structural condition of the tank and covers. Montego Freeport Cruise Ship Terminal Facility, Port Authority of Jamaica. Structural Engineer. Design for the 60,000 SF post tensioned,concrete frame building on piles. Kingston Container Terminal Phase V Maintenance Workshop Extension, Port Authority of Jamaica. Structural Engineer. Design for 70' high, 6400 SF steel frame for maintenance workshop structure with gantry crane girders. Kingston Container Terminal Phase V — KCT5 West Berth ,Port Authority of Jamaica. Structural Engineer. Design of new berth,retrofit of south berth,and anchored sheet pile retaining wall. Group B—Structural Engineering ,���� Page 47 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications LEO FIANDER, P.E. Project Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Fiander's experience includes the design of buildings, bridges, roadways, and transit systems 48 Years throughout the United States and abroad. His experience includes preparing construction forming and steel erection plans; providing storm drainage analysis and design; providing expert witness testimony; preparing quantity takeoffs for civil, structural, and architectural cost estimates; cost estimating for structural design; providing constructability reviews for water treatment plans and sewage treatment plans;and providing value engineering studies. Mr.Fiander has also provided CEI services for roadway projects involving utilities,streetscape, paving,traffic signals,drainage systems,and lighting. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE PROJECTS Professional Engineer Big Tree Road,Volusia County FL. Project Engineer responsible for the design of box culverts along Florida#13794 this 1-mile roadway section that included two, 12'lanes and continuous left turn lane. CR 427 Widening, Seminole County FL. Project Manager for the design for the reconstruction of EDUCATION CR 427 from a 2-lane roadway to a 4-lane roadway including transitions to existing pavement, M.S.Administrative topographic studies,signalization,signing and pavement markings. Science John Hopkins Lake Avenue/Kennedy Boulevard Reconstruction, Orange County FL. Project Manager. University Reconstruction of 2-lane roadway to 4-lane with median and turning lanes. Design elements included mapping, right-of-way documents,soil testing,and field surveying. B.S.C.E. University of New Brunswick Bluegrass Street from Rose Avenue to Albania Street, Orange County FL. Project Manager. Responsible for the preparation of the construction documents for the roadway reconstruction, drainage design and right-of-way maps. Trout Run Bridge,Capon Bridge,West Virginia. Responsible for the design of the 2-lane, 42-foot bridge consisting of steel girders with timber deck,and concrete abutments and wingwalls Public Safety Facility,Florida State University,Tallahassee FL. Project Engineer responsible for structural design of the two-story,35,000 SF facility Comiskey Park, Chicago IL. Project Manager. Responsible for the structural design of the baseball park,which included a 150-foot high space frame truss electronic signage,two levels of skyboxes, and a restaurant. Park-N-Ride Garage at the Centroplex,Orlando FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the planning, structural design, and construction administration of a new multilevel,625 car parking facility.This structure won the 1988 Award of Special Recognition from the Prestressed Concrete Institute for the creative design utilizing precast and prestressed concrete. Parking Garage, Akron OH. Responsible for the foundation design for the 5,000-car parking garage. Airside 2 Terminal, Orlando International Airport. Quality Control Engineer for the structural design of the foundations and 100-foot span steel trusses at the roof of concourse wings of the 350,000 SF airside terminal. Bennett Road Pump Station, Orlando FL. Structural Engineer. Responsibly for the preparation of construction plans for the upgrading and expansion of the building,wet wells for new submersible pumps,and new roof. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 48 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications LEO FIANDER, P.E. Structural Engineer PROJECTS PAGE 2 1-95 Widening, Broward County, FDOT District 4. Project Manager. Structural design for the widening of several bridges for HOV lanes. Design elements included concrete slab decks, concrete prestressed AASHTO girders, concrete piers and abutments on slab or pile foundations. SR 838 over SR 7, Broward County, FDOT District 4. Project Manager. Interchange improvements, widening to 4-lanes in each direction and modification of four ramps that involved two new bridges and retaining walls. 1-4/SR 535 Interchange Modifications, FDOT District 5. Project Engineer. Modification of existing diamond interchange, ramp additions, realignment, widening and relocation, bridge replacement,traffic signals, lighting,and widening of State Road 535 to 6-lanes with sidewalks. 1-95,1-70,1-83,Maryland DOT. Project Engineer. Responsible for the structural design involving concrete slab deck;girders of steel,cast-in-place concrete, prestressed AASHTO concrete; piers of concrete on slab or pile foundations; and abutments of concrete as stub or full height, with some long retaining walls,and box culverts of single and multi-span. 1-95, 1-83, 1-64, 1-81, Virginia DOT. Project Engineer. Structural design, concrete slab decks; steel girders, cast-in-place concrete, prestressed AASHTO concrete; concrete piers on slab or pile foundations; concrete abutments as stub or full height, retaining walls, and single and multi-span box culverts. San Salvador Expressway, San Salvador, El Salvador. Project Manager responsible for the bridge, expressway and interchange design encompassing 23, 9 interchanges, 13.6-miles of 6- lane expressway,2.5-miles of 30-foot aqueducts,toll plaza, right of way plans,and lighting. SR 436,FDOT District 5. Project Engineer.Structural design for the widening of 4-lane to 6-lane closed section highway including intersections, modernization of traffic signals, curbs and gutters, retention ponds,sewers, bicycle paths, hydraulic and hydrology analysis, maintenance of traffic,signalization,and lighting. Whitehurst Freeway, Washington D.C. Project Manager responsible for design review for the rehabilitation and widening of the Whitehurst Freeway along the Potomac River. Southeast/Southwest Freeway Rehabilitation,Washington D.C. Construction Manager for the 6,000 LF of the 6-lane expressway and 2-lane ramps both at grade and elevated. Mid-County Expressway, Delaware and Montgomery Counties, PennDOT. Resident Engineer responsible for the construction inspection, contract administration, material testing services, and construction survey. Group B—Structural Engineering ," Page 49 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications RANDY AUGAT Project Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Augat has more than twenty-six years experience in utility and storm sewer design, airport, 26 Years roadway, site planning, environmental permitting, project management, and construction administration. He has served as Project Manager for design projects ranging from rehabilitation of existing residential neighborhood water and sewer systems, new residential subdivisions, public schools, parks,and redevelopment streetscapes to commercial developments, roadway widening and international airport expansions. Mr. Augat is experienced in designing and managing projects that have included streetscapes, multi- use trails,greenways, parks,site planning, roadways, utility systems and storm sewers.These projects included design,environmental permitting,project management,and construction administration. He has served as Project Manager on projects ranging from trail, park, roadway,and international airport expansion projects to site plans for commercial developments, public schools, master planned residential communities and redevelopment streetscapes. He has permitted site plans, planned unit developments, roadways,water,sanitary sewer, and stormwater projects through the Department of Environmental Protection, Water Management Districts, Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Transportation,and county and municipal governments. EDUCATION PROJECTS B.A. Florida State Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation, Miami Beach FL. Project Manager for the design and permitting University of the City of Miami Beach Brittany Park seawall replacement. The project included the design of approximately 1000 LF of seawall driven parallel to the existing seawall.The elevation of the seawall PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION was raised to meet new City of Miami Beach seawall elevation standards. The project included American Society of permitting through DERM,ACOE, FDEP and SFWMD. Civil Engineers Indian Creek Park Kayak Launch, Miami Beach FL. Project Manager for the design and permitting of the City of Miami Beach Brittany Park kayak launch.The project included the design of an ADA kayak American Society of launch and the infrastructure needed to access the kayak launch. The project included permitting Highway Engineers through DERM,ACOE, FDEP and SFWMD. American Water Works Amway Center Streetscape, Orlando FL. Project Manager. Construction documents for streetscape Association improvements on Division Avenue and Hughey Avenue and South Street. Design included new roadways, sidewalks, lighting, signals, storm sewers, utility connections and removal or relocation of facilities in conflict with the improvements. Sanford Avenue Streetscape from 1st Street to 6th Street,Sanford FL. Project Manager. Panning, civil design,and construction documents for the streetscape improvements and included site analysis and preliminary planning, drainage design; utility relocations, ADA ramp design, signing and pavement marking plans, permitting;and construction administration. Lake Eola, Orlando FL. Project Manager. Prepared the stormwater management plan, design of the drainage system, potable water service, paving and final grading.The structural engineering services consisted of design for bridges,promenade deck, lookout deck,and shore excavation Cady Way Trail,Utility Coordination,FDOT District 5. Project Engineer. Utility relocation coordination on two multi-use trail projects. The utility relocations were extensive and followed FDOT guidelines for relocation procedures including Utility Relocation Agreements, Utility Relocation Schedules and the use of JPAs by some of the utility agencies. Broward County Greenways, Broward County FL. Project Engineer. Design, permitting and construction documents of 55+miles of 12'wide multi-use trails.The trails include 12' paved trails as well as equestrian trails. Project included stormwater and municipal permitting and a public outreach program. Design included trail signage, pedestrian bridges, splitter islands, intersection design, landscaping,drainage,site amenities and public art. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 50 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications RANDY AUGAT Project Engineer Page 2 PROJECTS Tephford Park, Tamarac FL. Project Manager. Civil design and permitting of a 22-acre city park adjacent to a SFWMD canal. Project included 8' wide concrete paths, landscaping, playground, fishing dock, public art, picnic pavilions,restrooms, park amenities,signage,and sanitary sewer lift stations. Manatee Island Park,Daytona Beach FL. Project Manager. Civil engineering design and permitting of a 2-acre city park on an island in the Intercoastal waterway. Project included 8-foot wide asphalt trail, restroom facility, lift station, landscaping,wood vehicle/pedestrian bridge, boat dock, playground, and picnic and group pavilions. Master Pump Station Improvements, Group 5, Orange County FL Project Manager. Preparation of conceptual site plans, preliminary design report, and cost estimates for rehabilitation/removal/relocation alternatives at five pump stations illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative. Lake Lucerne Stormwater System, Phase 2,Orlando FL. Project Manager. Modifications to an existing FDEP permitted stormwater management system to provide additional treatment and floc removal. Oversaw the preparation of plans and specifications for the nutrient separating baffle box which tied into the existing outfall into Lake Lucerne. International Drive Force Main (Little Lake Bryan Parkway to Pump Station 3597) Orange County FL. Project Manager. Design of 8,100 LF of replacement 30-inch force main. Design included the sliplining and conversion of the existing 30-inch force main to a reclaimed water main along with permitting and transferring existing force mains from lift stations to the new force main. Orlando Utilities Commission Project Renew,Orlando FL. Project Manager. Design for 3-mile section of transmission main. Project consists of an annual average flow 8.55 MGD pumping station and 14 miles of 24-inch DIP reclaimed water transmission main. Project is mostly routed along existing public right-of-way and easements. Meadow Woods Water Supply Facility, Orange County FL. Project Manager. Oversaw the civil and structural engineering services required to complete the modifications to the facility that was decommissioned as a water supply facility and the two existing wells retrofitted with new pumps and connected to a new raw water transmission main. Gore Street Stormwater Improvements, Orlando FL. Project Manager. Responsible for preparation of the maintenance of traffic plan and permitting for the construction of a new stormwater system along Gore Street between Bahama Drive and Huntington Place. Lift Station 3, Orlando FL. Project Manager. Structural design and analysis for the new wet well and pump station building.Also provided the civil/site design for the expanded pump station site as well as the Environmental Resource permitting. Big Tree Road, Volusia County FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of the stormwater system, which involved both urban and rural drainage systems and design of water and sanitary relocation for a 1-mile roadway section. Blue Springs Avenue, Volusia County FL. Project Engineer. Design for 5-foot wide, 1-mile section of concrete sidewalk constructed within the existing right of way. Also responsible for preparing utility permits for submission to FDOT. East Bay Street Improvements, Orange County FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the utility coordination for the milling and resurfacing of 5 streets. Williamson Boulevard,Volusia County FL. Project Engineer. Roadway widening of a 1.5 mile section to 4-lanes with sidewalks. The project included drainage design and permitting, and coordination with existing utility owners for relocation and protection of existing utilities. Group B—Structural Engineering „l Page 51 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications OSCAR BERMUDEZ, E.I. Project Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Bermudez has been involved in preparing and/or supervising the preparation of construction 13 Years documents, permits, and has overseen construction activities for various civil/site projects. His experience includes coordination of engineering activities with Federal, State and local agencies. Mr. Bermudez's experience includes the knowledge of the principles and practices of civil and site engineering along with knowledge of design, construction, operation and maintenance of water and sewage systems, roadway systems, airport facilities, ground transportation, runways and taxiways. EDUCATION PROJECTS B.S. Civil Engineering, Indian Creek Seawall Rehabilitation, Miami Beach FL. Project Engineer for the design and University of Central permitting of the City of Miami Beach Brittany Park seawall replacement. The project included the Florida, 2000 design of approximately 1000 LF of seawall driven parallel to the existing seawall. The elevation of the seawall was raised to meet new City of Miami Beach seawall elevation standards. The project included permitting through DERM,ACOE,FDEP and SFWMD. REGISTRATION Engineer Intern Indian Creek Park Kayak Launch,Miami Beach FL. Project Engineer for the design and permitting of Florida the City of Miami Beach Brittany Park kayak launch. The project included the design of an ADA #1100006877 kayak launch and the infrastructure needed to access the kayak launch. The project included permitting through DERM,ACOE, FDEP and SFWMD. Professional Engineer Northwest Water Reclamation Facility Phase III Expansion, Orange County FL. Project Engineer. Alabama#33560 Responsible for drainage calculations, preparation of civil plans, and environmental resource permitting though FDEP. The project included modification of the existing storm system to PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION accomodate additional runoff from the expansion. American Society of Consery II Water Reclamation Facility, Orlando FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the master Civil Engineers stormwater design, permitting and civil plans preparation for the expansion of an existing water reclamation facility(50+acres)for the City of Orlando.Also responsible for ERP permitting through Association of State the FDEP using SFWMD criteria and designing of the flood plain compensation. Flood Plain Managers Southern Regional Water Supply Facility,Orange County FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the master stormwater design and ERP permitting through FDEP using SFWMD criteria of a new water supply facility (150-acre site). The project included the design of an operation and maintenance building with parking, pump station building, ozone side stream building, LOX open storage, ozone building,pre-chlorine and fluoride buildings and three ground storage tanks. International Drive Force Main (Little Lake Bryan Parkway to Pump Station 3597)Orange County FL. Project Engineer. Preparing the construction documents for the design of 8,100 LF of replacement 30-inch force main. Design included the sliplining and conversion of the existing 30-inch force main to a reclaimed water main along with permitting and transferring existing force mains from lift stations to the new force main. Master Pump Station Improvements,Group 5,Orange County FL Project Engineer. Responsible for preparing the conceptual site plans, preliminary design report, and cost estimates for rehabilitation/removal/relocation alternatives at five pump stations illustrating improvements proposed in each alternative. Pump Station at Goldenrod Road and Hoffner Road, Orange County FL. Project Engineer responsible for construction administration for the construction of a pump station, which collects sewage from a 15-inch gravity sewer and discharges through an 8-inch force main. Responsibilities included review and responses for shop drawings, requests for information, and requests for substitutions; and managing the reconstruction and progress meetings, which included preparing the agenda and meeting minutes,and setting up the meetings. Sanford Avenue Streetscape,Sanford FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the stormwater system design and permitting through SJRWMD.Also repsonsible for the water main relocation design and permitting though FDEP for the streetscape project. Group B—Structural Engineering III'AIPage 52 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications OSCAR BERMUDEZ, E.I. Project Engineer Page 2 PROJECTS Williamson Boulevard, Volusia County FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the stormwater design and permitting for the widening of a 3-mile roadway section from 2-lanes to 4-lanes. The project included three wet detention ponds. East Bay Neighborhood Roadway and Sidewalk Improvements, Orange County FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design and permitting for retrofit of an existing subdivision's swale system to a piped system. Project included design of a wet detention pond to improve the water quality of the system and temporary wetland impacts. Bill Frederick Park, Orlando FL. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design and permitting of an overflow parking lot at this 178-acre park. Services included grading, erosion and sedimentation controls,parking lot design,and permitting the project through the SFWMD. Orlando Urban Trail Colonial Pedestrian Overpass, Orlando FL. Project Engineer responsible for preparation of the D/B RFP criteria for sidewalks, trails, curb, gutter, fencing, pedestrian circulation, ADA requirements, utility coordination,and stormwater permitting for the pedestrian bridge.A single pedestrian bridge,approximately 190 feet,will span diagonally over Colonial Drive and the CSX rail. SR 71 from end of Concrete Pavement to Intercoastal Bridge, Gulf County. FDOT District 3. Project Engineer. Responsible for NWFWMD permitting for 6.3-mile resurfacing, rehabilitation, and restoration. Permit exemption was obtained from water management district. SR 290(Olive Road)from Sears Boulevard to SR 289(9th Avenue), Escambia County. FDOT District 3. Project Engineer. Responsible for the NWFWMD permitting for 4.4-mile widening and resurfacing. Permit exemption was obtained from the water management district. Apopka High School,Orange County Public Schools. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design for the expansion of the existing bus loop driveways. The existing landscape islands and striping were removed in the existing parking lot and additional asphalt paving with concrete curbs was added as needed to connect the existing bus loop to the proposed new bus loop expansion. Edgewater High School, Orange County Public Schools. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of a segment of sidewalk over a new pipe culvert across an existing drainage swale. The project included the construction of a five-foot sidewalk and connecting crosswalks. Sunset Park Elementary School,Orange County Public Schools. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of a new 76-car parking lot.The design included grading and drainage details to maintain the existing positive drainage at the site. Windermere Elementary School, Orange County Public Schools. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design of a new driveway lane to accommodate two entrance lanes and one exit lane. Cypress Creek High School, Orange County Public Schools. Project Engineer. Responsible for permitting consumptive water use at the high school and providing design calculations to allow for the use of a minor permit application. Commercial Lanes Rehabilitation (BP-422) Orlando International Airport. Project Engineer. Responsible for roadway design, utility design, and drainage improvement design. Project included the rehabilitation and widening of the Terminal A and B Commercial Road through lane. Taxiway B-2 Extension and Taxiway B-1 Rehabilitation (BP-428), Orlando International Airport. Project Engineer. Responsible for drainage design, and permitting of the taxiway improvements.Also, coordinated with the subconsultants providing the signalization and electrical design. Taxiway A and A-1 Widening(BP-411),Orlando International Airport. Project Engineer. Responsible for drainage design, and permitting of the taxiway improvements. Also, coordinated with the subconsultants providing the signalization and electrical design. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 53 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications WESLEY BARNES, P.E. Quality Control/Quality Assurance Engineer EXPERIENCE Mr. Barnes has performed quality control/quality assurance activities for numerous roadway 40 Years projects. His reviews include checking of preliminary vertical and horizontal alignments for conformance to AASHTO and state requirements; staging plans and signing and marking plans for conformance with Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); satisfactory maintenance of cross drainage and intersection/driveway sight distances; review of right-of-way plans and right- of-way description plans for conformance with cross sections and general project controls; review of erosion and sedimentation control plans for conformance with the requirements of Local Issuing Authority. As a certified Level II Professional, he ensures utilization of Best Management Practices to assure avoidance/ mitigation of impact. All QA/QC reviews that Mr. Barnes performs ensure constructability,conformance to Agency presentation guidelines,avoid conflicts,and provide clarity of instructions to contractors. Additionally, Mr. Barnes has coordinated and reviewed the plans of multiple disciplines involved in design of building facilities. He has coordinated and supervised the performance of interdisciplinary reviews to identify and avoid plan conflicts between disciplines and ensure clarity of drawings and specifications. Mr. Barnes has performed and participated in Value Engineering for multiple transportation and building projects, which produced savings on capital and life-cycle costs while maintaining project quality. PROFESSIONAL LICENSE PROJECTS Professional Engineer Gretna Industrial Park, Gretna FL. Project Manager and QA/QC. Site design and construction Florida#58326 inspection of over 100 acres for commercial development.Also responsible for presentations to the Georgia#12125 Florida Department of Natural Resources,the Gretna City Council,and the community. Marsh Creek Pump Station, Fulton County GA. Project Director and QA/QC. Design to upgrade the existing raw sewage pump station. Project included demolition of the existing wastewater EDUCATION reclamation center and regarding of the existing site. B.S.,Civil Engineering Howard University Parking Deck and Lot at the World Congress Center, Atlanta GA. Project Manager and QA/QC. 1973 Supervised the design that included parking deck access and coordination of drainage,grading and paving of at grade lot including relocation/upgrade of major combined sewer. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION Traffic Control Center Modernization, Atlanta GA. Project Director and QA/QC. Provided on-site American Society of modifications of the existing facility elements, as well as installation and connections to the Civil Engineers upgraded equipment.The center was successfully linked to GDOT's ITS. American Railway Hemphill Pump Station Upgrade,Atlanta GA. Project Director and QA/QC. Plans and specifications Engineering and for removal and overhaul of eight 25 MGD pumps and eight 1600 HP motors, replacement of four Maintenance of Way water-cooled VFD drives,replacement of two EIM actuators and gearboxes. Association Koweta Road Pump Station,Atlanta GA. Project Director and QA/QC for design of over 30,000 feet of 48 inch and 36 inch diameter transmission mains, siting and development of grading, drainage and paving plans for the 22 MGD booster pump station,and storage tanks. Grady Memorial Hospital Renovation,Atlanta GA. Project Manager and QA/QC.Structural and civil design for the renovation of 100-year old hospital. Management of budget, staff assignments, quality control review,client interface,and construction administration. Georgia Dome Stadium, Atlanta GA. Project Manager and QA/QC. Construction plans and specifications for new roadways, parking lots, site grading, demolition of existing bridge, utility design,hydrological study and design for relocation of major combined sewers. ," 1' Group B—Structural Engineering Page 54 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications WESLEY BARNES, P.E. Quality Control/Quality Assurance Engineer PAGE 2 PROJECTS US 27/State Road 1 - GDOT, Randolph County GA. Value Engineering for 3.8-mile roadway widening from 2 to 4-lanes. Value Engineering resulted in reduction in median width resulting in savings in lengths of culverts, earthwork, paving at median openings, and flatter grades at driveway; 5' wide outside shoulders instead of 6.5'; adjustment of profiles to reduce amount of borrow material;and reduction of inside travel lane width from 12'to 11'. Semmes Street Streetscape, East Point GA. Project Manager and QA/QC. Oversaw the evaluation of design alternatives and preparation of cost estimates; traffic analysis, and the concept design. Oversaw preparation of final construction plans including right of way and utility relocations and coordination. Also responsible for preparing the exhibits and managing and participating in the community public meetings. Howell Mill Road, Atlanta GA. Project Manager and QA/QC. Oversaw the roadway design for arterial roadway along with new sidewalks, mast arm signal poles, and relocation of power lines and fire hydrants.Also responsible for preparing the exhibits and managing and participating in the community public meetings. Danforth Road, Fulton County GA. Project Director and QA/QC. Oversaw the traffic studies and preparation of construction plans for roadway rehabilitation, stormwater management, erosion control, intersection improvements, drainage improvements, utility coordination/relocation plans, and right of way. Also responsible for preparing the exhibits and managing and participating in the community public meetings. Nancy Creek Force Main Sewer, Atlanta GA. Project Engineer. Study and design of a relief sewer for the Nancy Creek trunk system. Responsibilities included developing population data from census and projections for the design year, performed flow calculations, and sizing of pipes. Also performed head loss calculations, developed system curves and selected pumps. Responsibilities also included route selection, part of which was along congested city streets and presentations at public meetings. South Delta Sewers, Atlanta GA. Project Manager. Design of five construction packages for the relocation/upgrade of this major trunk sewer, from private residences in Atlanta's historic Cabbagetown area, into public right-of-way. Responsibilities included development of Scope of Services for client,as well as interface with major private and franchised utility agencies. Cabbagetown Sewer Relocations,Atlanta GA. Project Engineer. Responsible for the design for the relocation of major combined sewers. The design involved the computation of storm water flows, addition of sanitary flows, sizing of pipes and relocation of existing sewer from private property to City ROW. Project also involved replumbing of many private residences to facilitate connection to the new sewer. Riverside Pump Station, Fulton County GA. Project Manager. Preparation of fast-track structural plans and specifications for the pump station, which had depth up to 60 feet below grade. Also supervised resident engineer, field inspectors, and administrative staff on this $7,000,000 facility and associated interceptor sewer and force main. Chattahoochee to Northside Waterline, Atlanta GA. Project Manager. Preparation of contract plans and specifications for over 5 miles of 24-inch waterline including major highway, railroad and stream crossing. Project consisted of preliminary phase, route study, agency coordination, cost estimates and design development report. Group B—Structural Engineering I�1 Page 55 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications THOMAS SMITH, P.E. Construction Management EXPERIENCE As Project Manager, Mr. Smith has worked on a wide array of projects for FDOT,OOCEA, Orange 40 Years County Public Works,GOAA,and City of Orlando. His projects include milling and resurfacing of 2- lane and 4-lane local roads, arterials and interstate roadways, widening from 2-lanes to 4-lanes or more of divided and undivided roadways, interchange design, intersection improvements, traffic signal modernization, drainage utilities design and coordination, permitting, sidewalk design and pedestrian safety improvements, overhead and ground-mounted sign structure design on interstates and local highways, pavement markings, maintenance of traffic, QA/QC management,and public involvement. As Construction Manager, Mr.Smith has provided CEI management and oversight for projects for the City of Jacksonville, Seminole County, FDOT, and City of Winter Park. The projects include sanitary and force main sewer installation, signing and pavement markings, school construction, site improvements, electrical, lighting and communication installations, roadway widening and reconstruction,drainage improvements,and constructability reviews. EDUCATION PROJECTS M.B.A. Management, Fairbanks Avenue,Winter Park FL.Senior Construction Manager. Project was the installation of a 1984, Roosevelt gravity sewer and force main within FDOT right-of-way along with service laterals to side streets, University roadway milling and resurfacing, installation of traffic signal mast arms, street lights, pedestrian B.S.Civil Engineering, improvements, and signing and pavement markings. Responsible for the construction inspection 1971, University of and monitoring of the contractor's activities.Additional responsibilities included coordinating site Michigan activities,monitoring the contractor's traffic control measures, preparation of inspection reports, and attending project construction meetings. REGISTRATION Seminole County Program Management — Environmental Services. Construction Manager. Professional Engineer Supervised CEI inspectors on projects involving water and wastewater mains installation and Florida#56378 roadway widening, assisted with, scheduling, reports, and data management. The program Georgia#026604 involved water and wastewater treatment plants and upgrades, process and environmental Illinois#062037266 upgrades, water and wastewater main installation, water and wastewater relocations with roadway widening,utility coordination,community awareness and meetings. CERTIFICATION Program Management Services for the Better Jacksonville Transportation Projects South and CTQP QC Manager East of the St. Johns River. Construction Manager. Responsibilities included assisting with CTQP Earthwork consultant selection, reviewing consultant submittals, preparing reports, exhibits, permit Construction Inspection applications,progress submittal of plans,specifications,and construction bid documents.Chaired Level 2 the utility coordination meetings and supervised CEI staff. Assisted with contract management, TECHNICAL COURSE scheduling, reports and data management. The program involved more than 30 roadway FDOT Specifications projects. Package SR 50-Avalon Road to SR 429, Florida DOT District 5. Project Manager. Oversaw construction inspection staff involved in the road reconstruction that included pipe placement, embankment, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION stabilized subgrade, limerock base, field density testing, maintenance of traffic, erosion control measures,and preparation of reports utilizing Trns*port Site Manager. Institute of Transportation Construction Management Services for MetroWest Elementary School Renovations, Palm Lake Engineers Elementary School Addition, and Lancaster Elementary School, Orange County Public Schools. Intelligent Responsible for overseeing the staff providing construction coordination, and construction Transportation Society administrative tasks,and construction inspection. of Florida i Group B—Structural Engineering ," Page 56 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications THOMAS SMITH, P.E. Construction Management Page 2 PROJECTS 1-94 Edens Expressway, Chicago, IL. Construction inspection for 2-mile reconstruction of interstate highway including pavement replacement, bridge rehabilitation, median barrier, drainage,signing,lighting and safety devices. 1-294 Tri-State Tollway, Chicago, IL. Construction inspection for 3-mile rehabilitation and widening that included pavement, bridge deck, drainage, lighting, median barrier and safety devices. 1-90 Northwest Tollway,Chicago,IL Inspection for the rehabilitation and widening of 1.5 miles of interstate pavement and bridge decks, drainage, lighting, median barrier, retaining walls construction signing and safety devices. Dan Ryan Expressway (I-90/94) Reconstruction, 31st Street to 1-290, Chicago IL. Three-mile, 8 and 12-lane roadway and viaduct reconstruction, ramps,2 major interchanges and viaduct and 2- mile bridge section. Prepared the Project Report, civil design plans, specifications, cost estimates (20 separate contract packages),and provided CEI during construction. Dempster Street, Skokie, IL. Design and CEI for 2-mile reconstruction of arterial highway, drainage,lighting,signing,traffic signals,railroad grade crossing,and utility relocations. Clark Street Bridge, Evanston, IL. Reconstruction of railroad bridge and adjacent roadways, drainage,embankment and retaining walls,electrical traction and communication systems. Project Management Oversight Services, USDOT/FTA. Project Task Engineer. Responsible for providing program management oversight for the FTA on federally-funded transit projects. Oversight requirements include the overview of project activities to verify management of the scope, budget, and to review technical and administrative documents which may be prepared by or on behalf of the recipient of the federal funds. It also requires arranging, managing, and coordinating meetings on a periodic basis, in order to maintain an understanding by all participants of the project and progress; and in general ascertaining the intent of the FTA, in keeping with the conditions of the FTA grant. Projects include Milwaukee Streetcar which is a 2- mile starter streetcar system that will connect the Central Business District with the Milwaukee Intermodal Station and the high density residential and entertainment areas, the Cincinnati Streetcar which is a 3.6-mile modern streetcar circulator system extending throughout the Cincinnati Central Business District and the Over the Rhine neighborhood along a route that includes the Downtown/OTR Circulator and the Riverfront Loop; and the Sugar House Streetcar which is a two-mile system extension from Central Pointe Station in South Salt Lake City to the Sugar House district in Salt Lake City along the route of and abandoned railroad right-of-way. i Group B—Structural Engineering „� Page 57 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications JEFFREY LOVER Construction Inspector EXPERIENCE Mr. Loyer is experienced in all aspects of highway and secondary roadway design and inspection 30 Years including new and reconstruction projects. His construction inspection experience includes roadway and sanitary/storm sewer construction, and field reviews during the construction of projects in the post design phase of the contract. His experience also includes design and review of horizontal and vertical geometric alignments, utility coordination, certified traffic control, specifications, preparing and checking all final computations, pavement design and other tasks required to produce roadway plans to the client's standards and specifications. TECHNICAL COURSE PROJECTS FDOT Drainage Design Fairbanks Avenue, Winter Park FL. Construction Inspector. Project was the installation of a gravity FDOT Traffic Control sewer and force main within FDOT right-of-way along with service laterals to side streets, roadway Plan Design milling and resurfacing, installation of traffic signal mast arms, street lights, pedestrian FDOT Traffic improvements,and signing and pavement markings. Responsible for the construction inspection and Engineering monitoring of the contractor's activities. Additional responsibilities included coordinating site Fundamentals activities, monitoring the contractor's traffic control measures, preparation of inspection reports, FDOT Value Engineering and attending project construction meetings. FDOT Project Construction Management Services for Lancaster Elementary School, Orange County Public Management Training Schools. Responsible for providing construction coordination, and construction administrative tasks, Modules I-IV and construction inspection. FDOT Trns*port Hopewell Township Road Program, Hopewell PA. Designer and Inspector for the township's annual FDOT Specification road program. Duties included review of shop drawings, final estimates, field inspection of paving, Package storm and sanitary sewer construction and traffic control. Institute of Transportation McKees Rocks Borough Road Program,McKees Rocks PA. Designer and Inspector for the Borough's Engineering—Planning annual road program. Duties included review of shop drawings, final estimates, field inspection of and Design of Freeways paving,storm and sanitary sewer construction and traffic control. and Interchanges Collier Township Road Program, McKees Rocks PA. Designer and Inspector for the Township's MicroStation/GEOPAK annual road program. Duties included review of shop drawings, final estimates, field inspection of paving,storm and sanitary sewer construction and traffic control. CERTIFICATION Chickasaw Trail from Florida Hospital/Wal-Mart Driveway to Winter Song Drive, OOCEA. Field Advanced Traffic Review and Inspection for the widening of Chickasaw Trail over SR 408,from 2 to 4-lanes with a turn Control Plan Design lane and new braided access ramp bridges from SR 408 EB to Chickasaw Trail and from Chickasaw AASHTO Roadside Trail to WB SR 408. Design SR 429/CR 437A Interchange, OOCEA. Field Review and Inspection for construction of a new CTQP Earthwork diamond interchange with full access in both directions for CR 437A to and from SR429,and with full Construction Inspection provision for future toll plazas on the ramps to the north. Responsibilities included review of shop Level 1 drawings, preparation of RFI responses,final inspection,and review of final record drawings. CTQP Earthwork Construction Inspection SR 44, Lake County, Florida DOT District 5. Field Review and Inspection for the 4-lane urban and Level 2 rural roadway, including traffic control, erosion control, signing and pavement markings, and quantities. Nuclear Gauge Safety Hazmat Certification US 192, Osceola County, Florida DOT District 5. Field Review and Inspection for the 6-lane rural roadway,including traffic control,signing and pavement markings,utility relocation,and quantities. South Access Road, Orlando International Airport. Field Review and Inspection for the 1.5-mile widening of the South Access Road from a 2-lane to a 4-lane roadway.. Group B—Structural Engineering 111011 Page 58 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications JEFFREY LOVER Construction Inspector Page 2 PROJECTS McCulloch Road at North Tanner Road, Orange County FL. Field Review and Inspection for construction of intersection widening and replacement of traffic signals SR 408 from Kirkman Road to the Lake Sherwood Bridge.OOCEA. Responsible for the horizontal and vertical alignment,plans production and quantities. SR 417 from the Lake Jesup Bridge to Lake Mary Boulevard. Seminole County Expressway 30%Authority. Responsible for the 30%drainage design,roadway plans production and quantities. SR 417/Boggy Creek Road Interchange Improvements, OOCEA. Responsible for horizontal and vertical alignment,plans production and quantities. SR 408 from Oxalis Drive to Chickasaw Trail,OOCEA. Responsible for the preparation of roadway widening and signing and pavement marking plans for the widening of Chickasaw Trail over SR 408 from 2 to 4-lanes with a turn lane and new braided access ramp bridges from SR 408 EB to Chickasaw Trail and Chickasaw Trail to WB SR 408. Heintzelman Boulevard, Orlando International Airport. Responsibilities included design of the horizontal and vertical alignments, traffic control, erosion control, and quantities for the 4-lane urban roadway. West Side Airport Roadway Pavement Rehabilitation (H243), Orlando International Airport. Responsible for preparing the signing and pavement marking plans and detail sheets to indicate new signs and pavement marking locations,sign and pavement marking types,and special details required for the installation of the signs and pavement markings. All new signs and pavements markings complied with MUTCD requirements and FDOT specifications. Little Econ Greenway Bicycle Path,Orange County FL. Responsibilities included the design for 4.1 miles of bicycle/pedestrian trail running alongside the Little Econ River, design of horizontal and vertical alignment,and preparation of plans and quantities. Pine Castle Sidewalks, Orange County FL. Construction contract plans for new sidewalks. Responsible for the design of horizontal and vertical alignments and preparation of plans and quantities Apopka-Vineland Road at Olympia High School, Orange County FL. Responsible for the horizontal and vertical alignments, signing and pavement markings, plans and quantities for the lengthening of the southbound left turn lane. East Bay Neighborhood Roadway and Sidewalk Improvements (CDBG Project). Responsible for design of the horizontal and vertical alignments, signing and pavement markings, preparation of plans and quantities. Wekiva Springs Road at Clay Springs Elementary School, Orange County. FL. Preparation of construction contract plans for addition of a right turn lane and replacement of the existing traffic signals. Responsible for design of the horizontal and vertical alignments, signing and pavement markings,preparation of plans and quantities. Group B—Structural Engineering ®jI Page 59 Section 2 Experience and Qualifications 2.3 Financial Capacity BPA's Supplier Qualification Report has been submitted directly from Dun & Bradstreet to the City of Miami Beach: IIi'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 60 Section 3 Approach and Methodology 3.1 Approach and Methodology BPA has extensive experience providing engineering design for a range of structural projects. Our engineering efforts for structural projects has included design documents for roadways, buildings, rail and multi-modal facilities, airport expansion projects, streetscapes, and water, wastewater and reclaimed water utility projects. BPA has completed designs for structural engineering projects for numerous clients throughout Florida. The approach that we present was specifically developed to provide professional services to the City of Miami Beach for the successful implementation and completion of the scope of services for an assigned project. The scope of services may include a range of professional services. Each design and construction phase of a project requires skilled planning and design, attention to detail, frequent communication and interaction among all parties involved, and a Project Manager who listens and responds to the owner's needs. TASK IMPLEMENTATION Once a task is identified, BPA's Project Manager, Trevor Adams, P.E., LEED AP,will work closely with the City in order to understand the intent and goals of the assignment.We will formulate a team with the most qualified professionals for each task.We will review applicable documents and visit the site, and then develop a comprehensive draft scope, fee and schedule to present to the City's Project Manager.After the task is approved, BPA will develop the project as follows. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE This phase includes the preliminary data collection efforts, development of alternatives, and a preliminary engineering report which includes cost estimates and schedules. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE This phase includes critical preliminary services that are outlined below. Documents will be developed and prepared in accordance with applicable standards and provide sufficient detail for review by the City. The design kick-off meeting and due diligence phase of each task will begin immediately upon issuance of a NTP from the City with a design kick-off meeting. BPA then thoroughly reviews the applicable record documents, studies, and other pertinent information to the project in concert with an inventory of existing site features and conditions. Our team will identify and analyze requirements of all regulatory agencies having permit jurisdiction over various portions of each project. • Project Schedule. The schedule will include dates and durations for design components, deliverables and receivables, permits, reviews,and construction. Group B—Structural Engineering Page 61 111041 Section 3 Approach and Methodology • Construction Cost Estimate. A construction cost estimate will be developed during the Design Development Phase. The quantities for each item will be determined by an experienced reviewer. A second independent reviewer will also calculate the quantities for each item. Discrepancies will be reconciled. We are keenly aware of the importance of being accurate in our costs estimating. If the cost estimate exceeds the City's budget, BPA will immediately advise the owner with an explanation of the cause of the anticipated cost overrun and provide recommendations on ways to reduce the cost. • Permitting. BPA will coordinate with the applicable regulatory agencies for each task. Continued coordination, with all agencies, will be provided during the permit review process of each project to ensure that the final approval is granted and meets the City's objectives and the schedule for construction. • Safety and Construction Sequence. BPA will work and coordinate with the City operations to develop plans for construction sequencing.A primary operational goal is to minimize impacts. • Engineer's Report. A preliminary engineer's report will be developed and will describe the project in detail and will include a discussion of the rationale for selection of various design elements and other features that are required by the City including modifications of standards if required. • Deliverables. At the end of the Design Development Phase, our team will submit Division 1 and 2 specifications, plans,a construction schedule,a preliminary engineer's report, and a cost estimate. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE This phase includes all work required to furnish the City with a set of complete documents, including Division 1 and 2 specifications, plans, an updated construction schedule, the engineer's report, and an updated cost estimates. All permits will be submitted during this phase. FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Upon completion of the construction documents phase, the final construction documents design phase will begin. This phase will include all work required to furnish the City with a set of complete documents, including specifications, plans,an updated construction schedule,the engineer's report, and an updated cost estimate. A technical review meeting will then be held to discuss and obtain feedback and comments from the City upon their review of the Final Plans deliverable. Applicable comments from this meeting will be incorporated into a set of bid documents.The bidding and award phase will begin when the City advertises the project. BIDDING AND AWARD PHASE Our team will assist the City in advertising for, and obtaining bids or proposals for each contract for construction. We will attend the pre-bid conference to present a description of the project and prepare pre-bid meeting minutes. We will prepare addenda (as necessary). Our Project Manager understands the critical nature of the bidding process and has successfully assisted in awarding numerous bids to contractors on a variety of projects. !IPA Group B—Structural Engineering Page 62 1 Section 3 Approach and Methodology CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE Upon receipt of a NTP to the contractor, BPA will start construction administration services. Conformed documents and the construction management plan (CMP), prepared by BPA, will be issued to the City, the contractor, and the Owners Authorized Representative (OAR). Professional services to be rendered by our team during this phase include: attending pre-NTP and pre-construction conferences; administering the construction contract; attending construction job coordination meetings at regular intervals; issuing necessary clarifications/interpretations of contract documents; providing consultation and advice to the City; conducting periodic site visits to observe construction progress and to confirm that construction is in conformance with the construction documents; checking and reviewing contractor submittals (schedules, samples, materials, shop, setting, installation, and erection drawings); assisting in preparation of change orders; participating in inspections and preparing punch lists for substantial completion and final acceptance; receiving and reviewing required certificates of inspections, tests and approvals; determining and/or reviewing recommended amounts of payment; preparing supplemental drawings as necessary; conducting as-built data collection upon completion of construction; and preparing record (as built) drawings for the completed project. QUALITY CONTROL In our continuing responsibility to improve our service and our product, BPA follows a strict Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process. Our Project Manager is experienced with BPA's QA/QC process and will be responsible for implementation and coordination of QA/QC procedures. The documents are also reviewed for consistency and coordination between disciplines. This review will ensure that all technical disciplines involved in the project are consistent and complement each other. The items reviewed include accuracy of the work (i.e.geometrics, quantity take-offs); coordination between specifications, drawings, bid items,front end documents; and associated permitting. Prior to each delivery, all subconsultants utilized on a project must provide BPA's Project Manager with a document confirming that they have performed the proper review of their documents. BPA also provides a QA/QC review of the deliverable of each subconsultant prior to submittal to the City. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan STEP 1 The project start-up meeting is held prior to starting work on the project. The Project Start-Up Meeting project's Quality Assurance Coordinator, Project Manager and key staff participate in the meeting. The items discussed at the meeting are scope of services, project budget, project schedule, project requirements, and assignment of design responsibilities. STEP 2 This step takes place during the design concept development phase at 30% Design Concept Development completion when all the available data has been collected and reviewed and the Review Phase criteria and design requirements defined. The purpose of this review is to perform a Value Engineering Study on the project. This study will ensure that the project design uses the most economical construction materials and techniques that meet the specific design criteria. Group B—Structural Engineering I�I�� Page 63 Section 3 Approach and Methodology STEP 3 Monitoring the development of the final documents is a continuous process. Monitor Final Design Documents This review is done at progress meetings attended by the Project Manager,the Project Engineer and key staff members. In addition to reviewing the documents, the project schedule is discussed and staffing requirements are determined. STEP 4 This is an in-depth color-coded review of the project by the Project Manager, Technical Review Project Engineer and individuals who are not directly involved in the design to make sure that the final documents are technically correct and easily interpreted. To help reviewers, a checklist is followed which lists all the important items to be reviewed. After the technical team has completed their review, the documents are given to the appropriate individuals for any changes.As the changes are made,they are marked with a highlighter. STEP 5 Quality Assurance Review is the final step of the quality assurance plan Quality Assurance Review process. A quality assurance review meeting is held between the Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator, Project Manager, and other key individuals. During this review, the QA Coordinator compares the prints marked up during the Technical Review with the final documents to confirm that all corrections have been made. The QA Coordinator thoroughly checks the drawings to assure the construction sequence and to assure the drawings are checked before they are submitted to the client. CONTINUITY,COMMUNICATION,AND COORDINATION BPA will maintain constant coordination and synchronization with any subconsultants, City staff, and other relevant parties.This coordination will be accomplished through: • Working group meetings to coordinate with subconsultants and other relevant parties. • Team meetings at intervals deemed necessary. • Project management coordination meetings with City personnel,as necessary. • Availability of our Project Manager and other key staff, including subconsultant staff, as necessary. • Regular submittals of drawings, specifications, schedules, cost estimates, and reports to the City. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION BPA is experienced in preparing Public Information Meetings to provide the public and stakeholders in the project with the project information and address public concerns about the potential impacts on adjacent properties and entities. BPA is accustomed to conducting presentations, community workshops, and information gathering sessions and establishing public feedback channels to keep the public informed about the project and ensure their rights in participating in the project scoping process. Group B—Structural Engineering �`�•� Page 64 Section 3 Approach and Methodology If necessary, BPA will provide effective public participation meetings. We will keep community leaders, influential groups, and business people in the City of Miami Beach and the project corridor involved in the design phase of the planned project. We identify the various stakeholders and: • Build awareness, interest, and support in the general public and decision-makers by using innovative media techniques. • Provide and encourage opportunities for direct citizen involvement from the early stages of the design process. • Coordinate public meetings and presentations to present proposed plans and to collect citizen input. SUBCONSULTANTS BPA will provide all structural engineering services for any assigned project. Should the need for services such as survey, geotechnical engineering, or environmental engineering be required for an assigned project, BPA will engage the services of a firm approved by the City of Miami Beach. Additionally, if any assigned project requires the use of a subconsultant in a specialized service, BPA will endeavor to engage the services of DBE/MBE subconsultant firms. WHY SELECT BPA? BPA prides itself in its ability and willingness to approach each client and project with an open mind allowing us to best serve the client's individual preferences and requirements. With efficiency and quality, BPA is committed to working in partnership with the City of Miami Beach to make the City's projects a success. Our firm has the capability, availability, and commitment to diligently complete this contract. BPA prides itself on its excellent quality of work. In summary, we have the type of expertise and professional skills in which our firm excels. Our successful past experience and our enthusiasm to continue our long-term relationship with City of Miami Beach makes BPA team an excellent choice for this contract. 1tI'AI Group B—Structural Engineering Page 65 Section 3 Approach and Methodology 3.2 Workload BPA's current and projected workload is at a level that will enable us to successfully execute this project in a timely manner. To assure quality control and a full commitment to contractual obligations, we thoroughly scrutinize our workload before pursuing or accepting a new assignment. We unhesitatingly state that BPA has the ability to provide all professional resources necessary to begin work immediately upon receipt of notice to proceed. Our proposed staff are immediately available for an assignment.We will assign personnel who have experience and knowledge of design and plan production that is consistent with the City's standards and criteria. We are committed to client satisfaction, while conforming to the budget and schedule. Percentage of Availability 2014 2015 Staff Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Trevor Adams, PE, LEED AP, Project Manager 45% 55% 55% 55% 55% 65% 65% 65% 65% 50% 50% 50% 50% Peter Acel, PE, Project Engineer 50% 50% 70% 70% 70% 70% 80% 80% 80% 80% 75% 75% 75% Wayne Adams, PE, Project Engineer 45% 45% 45% 45% 40% 40% 50% 50% 50% 55% 55% 55% 55% Leo Fiander, PE, Project Engineer 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% Randy Augat, Project Engineer 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% Oscar Bermudez, El, Project Engineer 55% 55% 55% 65% 55% 65% 55% 65% 55% 65% 55% 65% 65% Wesley Barnes, PE,QA/QC Engineer 55% 55% 60% 60% 60% 45% 45% 60% 60% 60% 55% 55% 55% Thomas Smith, PE,Construction Management 80% 70% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40% 40% 40% 70% 70% 50% 80% Jeffrey Loyer,Construction Inspector 50% 55% 55% 70% 70% 70% 65% 65% 65% 75% 75% 75% 75% Group B—Structural Engineering I jl•,' Page 66 Section 3 Approach and Methodology 3.3 DBE Utilization As a disadvantaged/minority-owned firm, BPA is committed to providing opportunities to minority and disadvantaged-owned businesses. It is our belief that positive business relationships will produce a diverse group of capable, competitive and successful businesses,which in turn will benefit our Clients.To achieve this, BPA endeavors to offer opportunities to small businesses inclusive of minority firms and women-owned firms by engaging their services as subconsultants on our project team. BPA has a culturally and ethnically diverse workplace from its owner to employees. BPA employs a workforce that is reflective of many nationalities and cultures and has established programs and policies for recruiting and retaining minority and women engineers and staff, and encourages all of our employees to become involved in our communities. It is BPA's policy to provide equal employment opportunities at all times related to employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, age, national origin, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, or any other status projected by state or federal law.The policy applies to recruiting, hiring,training, promotion,evaluation,termination, benefits,compensation,eligibility,working conditions,and all other aspects of employment. If any assigned project requires the use of a subconsultant in a specialized service, BPA will endeavor to engage the services of DBE/MBE subconsultant firms. • Group B—Structural Engineering `�,�� Page 67 Section 3 Approach and Methodology Internal Services Department MIAMI-DADS Small Business Development COUNTY I I I t.W 1 Strout_ 19'n Floor Miami,Florida 33128 rn"iarmyari rttw.>�.aw T 3,On-375.31 1 T F 185-37f5-3180- CERT.NO 11278 Approval Date:0710712014•SBE July.7,2014 Expiration Date. 07131121)17 foie.Brindley hater's BR:NDLEY PIETER%AND ASSOCIATES. 81,5 NW 47th Ate,Suite-335 Miami,Ft 33128-0000 Dear Mr.-Platers: Miami D°-de County Sraati Businra-.s f,7essatoprnent (SSO), a etNisfon of the internal Services Deo.artnent (1S0)has completed the review of your application and attachments submitlerd ror ccrtifrc:atioa, Your firm is of rially cerlited as a Miami Dade County Small Business Enterprise(SEE)in accordance with section 8>t..I.'i.1 of the code of Miami Dade County. SBE eethflcat;r :,vrriict kr three years provided that you submit a"Continuing Eligibility Aft'ldault"or af- lure icier annul awry date of July 7 for the first and second year of the three year period,Tie affidavit must indicate arty changes or no charms in your firm pertinent to your certification olersitsitity. "Iho submittal of a "Continuing Eligibility Affidasit" nrtntsrtty with specific. supporting documents on or before yotw Anniversary Date i-» morainic! to maintain the three year certification_ You will be notified of this• roepon ibility fn advance of the Annhersary Date. Failure to comply with the said responsibilities may restat in immediate action to decertify the fans. Pursuant to the appticablo section of the code :. li.tad &Dose, "once your tirei his been decertified, your firm .halt not be nligiEyia to re-apply for certification for twelve(12)months from the time of time,decsnifiratctkn," if. at any time, theca is a material change in the firr:, including, but not limitcmd to, owner;,hip, officers.,, director,scope of work being performed,daily operations,afalfatlon(e)with oilier businesses or the physical Location of the firm, you must notify this office. in vatting, within (30)days. Notification shouki include supporting} documentation. You wait receive'timely Instructions freni tihi: office as to hew you should proceed.if necessary. This letter will be the only apprecal notification ianuod for tho duration of your arm's three years certification. If the firm attains graduation or becomes ineligible during the threes year tertificxrttan period you will too properly notified following an adminlstrathe process that your fBmYs ccrtificaation h.-t been rearno‘est pursuant to the code. Your company is certified In the categories as listed below off flag you the opportunity to bid and participate on contracts with goals. Please note thsat the categories listed are tery cjonersl end are used only to assist.our customers in searching the directory for certified firms to meet contract goals. You can find the flair's up-tood:rto certification profiles as well as all other certified firms on the Miami Dade County Internal Services Department. Small Business Development. Certified Firma' Directory at the websile http:l/v w.mlamidacte.go.tbussiraesslbusines -certification-prograrns,aip, Thank you fear doing usinttsa.with Miami Dade County. SinoerQiya s a; Gary Ha aid;DiMSio -rectcx- Smart Business Deaolopment Division CATEGORfS:(Your firm may bid or-p:trticipete an contracts only under these categories) HYDROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHY vERVtCL°s(gF3E8 CC' TKUGT10N MANAGEMENT SERVICES(SEE) ENGINEERING CONSULTING(SE M) AIiO 415CIWAL SERVICES,PROF ESlONA,■Satt) -- a4:sri.C:Yt2Ca''i mnir_x"a f�,.Glr.. .:Sunjarmti P C IAT,s'S.t„SEadICES pSer- 4tistr d©ALO., EFhfr a::zBE" • `Citianr i,€ Jk ra FLOOD- TRQL-PRCtirlECTL Ai.(SSE). • PLAra at4G,TRW;Gr MVLANIlY.PEGICP4GL: R5A MIDE,AND.=S A:7 :c.gaik j NNINS;,.. ist TALLA.T?Ci AND PECr c1) -_) • t FA1'O FACIUTTIES:Fl RK5,MAFUFiAA-�.J AFCI IRE riiAL :,A'ti c lec'n f.TREATMENT',AHO CklEPOSAL_ unTEr 1UtA.i:tSf t•r CCSL,.Arm SUBWAYS 4 FAG ITTEC1i..SSL aEE; •. urT f rEa(GAS STEAM,E1EGTT*.t' ;PA 1`ECTuR_Sl..€sael 'NA7EI3 SUPPLY;TREA';P.ErrT:.so t s'Tra it a ci tE C1Ue.. Aactir'TE /1/4/46€p—t rl 's is e .- Group B—Structural Engineering «��"' Page 68 Section 3 Approach and Methodology Florida UCP DBE Directory Number of Records Returned: 1 Selection Criteria: Vendor:SRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES INC Vendor Name: BRJNCLEY PETERS&ASSOCIATES INC Certification: O8E MBE 08A: Former Name: Susinees Qesoiption: CIVIL ENGINEERNG,STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING,CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,PROGRAM MANAGEMENT,CONSTRUCTT:ON ENGINEERING INSPECTION.,CADD SERVICES:TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES Mailing Address: 2E00 MAITLAND CENTER PARKWAY SU MAITLAND.Ft 3275t- Contact Mime: BRINCI.EY B PETERS Phone: (407)830-8700 Fax (407)83048877 Email: EPtETERSOBPA•ENGINEERS CCrtt Statewide Availability: Y Certified NAICS 54.1330 Engisteoring Seriaes Group B—Structural Engineering IIIDA.1 Page 69 � GRIND-1 OP ID:ME DATE(MMIDDIYYYY) AC-CPR I`r CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE �...------ 11/2512015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). CONTACT PRODUCER Melinda Potts-Cerio NAME: O'Neil,Lee&West,Inc. PHONE 407-425-3411 FAX No):407-843-2632 3222 Corrine Drive,Suite C (A/C,No.Ext): Orlando,FL 32803 -MAIL ADDRESS:mcerio @olwinc.com Matthew West INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Foremost Insurance Co. INSURED Brindley Pieters&Assoc.,Inc. INSURER B:Maryland Casualty Company 19356 Patricia McCarthy 2600 Maitland Center Pkwy#180 INSURER C:Lexington Insurance Company Maitland,FL 32751 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE_POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILA ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER (MMIDD/YYYY) (MM DD/YYYY) LIMITS TYPE OF INSURANCE INS() WVD A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR X PAS08400923 06/24/2015 06/24/2016 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES R occurrence) $ 1,000,000 MED EXP(Any one person) _$ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY I I PRO- PRODUCTS_PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 JECT $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABIUTY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident) A X ANY AUTO PAS08400923 06/24/2015 06/24/2016 BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS _ AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS X PROPERTY DAMAGE NATO-OWNED (Per accident) $ AUTON OS $ X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR _EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE PAS08400923 06/24/2015 06/24/2016 AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000 DED X RETENTION$ 10,000 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X STATUTE FOR TH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY 1,000,000 B ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE YIN WC002655639 11/13/2015 11/13/2016 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N I A (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 A Property Section PAS08400923 06/24/2015 06/24/2016 BPP 177,100 C Prof Liability 031711006 11/13/2015 11/13/2016 Limits $1 M/$2M DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on as needed basis for the City of Miami Beach,FLorida. Professional Liability deductible-$45,000 ITS Account Number-MBF642 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN The City of Miami ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Beach,FL c/o Ins Tracking Service Inc AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PO Box 20270 Long Beach,CA 90801 /741444:7 1 ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ■ ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD