Loading...
Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 020/c-a1011 d- do 1 C q a 0Cog AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG DISCIPLINE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN' ARCHITECTURE RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 AND 2015-29068 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE.A 29 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 34 ATTACHMENT C 35 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this 12 day of February, 2016 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., a California corporation having its principal office at 800 Douglas Entrance North Tower, 2nd Floor, Coral Gables, FL 33134 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on June 10 and July 8, 2015, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2015-29041 and 2015-29068, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in 4 writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami.Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in 5 compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation to ether with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued ( 9 thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. 6 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual 7 agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A — Consultant Service Order Schedule B —Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C —Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable 8 Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the-essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. 10 Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made'to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and • re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and 11 consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with - this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under 12 this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION,. SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT. BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. 13 The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to 14 verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve • as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions Y 9 (P p rY) on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by 15 the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or • committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any Y� Y P Y Y Y Y other third art as a substantive review thereof. p Y ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 16 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final 17 updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability. to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written 18 approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers. for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions . thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant P a Y request. mark-up ment re uest. No mark-u shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification., 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 22 violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional.Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on'the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain.this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. 23 • ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes • or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. • 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: . City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 • Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 800 Douglas Entrance North Tower, 2nd Floor Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attn: Randy Mejeur,—MS, LEED AP Attn: Agustin Barrera—Vice President Tel: (213) 593-8100 Fax: (213) 593-8187 Email: randy.mejeur(cr�,aecom.com Email: qus.barrera a( aecom.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover)` the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, 26 Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these pres, .., t ,be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested;b'y ,- --'`r respective witnesses and Ci y Clerk on the day and -.=r' _''`=`;',:�;•-bove written. 7 Attest. • �I �!� MIAMI,�BE C YCLERK ' �--j , ' ' \Q 0 .) • -fx Attest y. AECO 4 CH 1CAL SERVICES, INC. "d • • • 411r.;fisi r APP- Signature/Seefefai�t -�S,s��.� e 4�.� '�F. , b �'`�''r f •ent \.s,. ` • 411./Go ArreOgIOVED AS TO FORN Print Name Print N. AGE &FO EXECUTION 28 City Attorney Rite We- • • including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. • 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall'not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or.corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at.all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS_ AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her.partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in.respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (thrbughlhe City,Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject-_ail proposed assignees, o. successor..s. o,r other changes in the ownership structure=an_ d composition of the Consultant. 27 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 800 Douglas Entrance North Tower, 2nd Floor Coral Gables, FL 33134 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2014-146-YG) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount $ of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 29 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 30 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer (Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager (Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector (CEI) $103.50 Inspector (CEI, Field or $ 94.88 Construction) II 31 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS Discipline: Landscape Architecture • Mix'd Greens Enviromental, Inc. Role: Certified Arborist Discipline: Planning and Urban Design Architecture • Mix'd Greens Enviromental, Inc. Role: Certified Arborist 32 • • i • •• ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM • a _ •._ - - i, I: � - , I to � - h `1 _ �1 � ) Y , -., I , - _ • • • • • _. � _ - �� 1. �} -_ • -� �_ ' - _ 33- • 1, RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29041 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN • ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg & Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after. reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this • day of 71fl2O1 s. ATTEST: rt ////4/ Rafael E. ranado, City c:•�`�%‘‘‘vii-,11'`'+%Philip Le V- IX •?r fr 106 14, •T:IAGENDA120151June1PR000R,.� ENT12014-e-�--% - .. ofesgiona / •hit-' -1 and Engineering Services-Reso.docx INCORP ORATED. .4 41111 QH APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE • &FOR EXECUTION City Attorney Date • COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. On February 26, 2015, March 19, 2015, March 31, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Evaluation Committees appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 054-2015 convened to evaluate Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, The Committees were instructed to score and rank the proposals received pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The results of the evaluation committee process were presented to the City Manager for his recommendation to the City Commission. Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. After reviewing the submission and the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 6 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: epartment Director Assi. Manager City M ager AD 1 ECM DM MT IV JLM A4 _ T.IAGEND ♦0151June1PROCUREMENT120 1 4-3 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Summa •. x MIAMI• 143 AGENDA I- rw � DATE 6-ito-( MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members o he City Co ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 10, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEP NG THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING, AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, passed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. 144 Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Commission p g Y 9 9 Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Barmello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA (Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach 145 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals (RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach Because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration has evaluated and has herein made recommendations for award by category group. For Group 1, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received for Landscape Architecture, Planning and Urban Design Architecture, and Environmental Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 1 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering (Group 1) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Pretwna . ,'Architectural aced. Engineerin:g'.Services LOW (LANDSCAPE Margarita Rogelio Humberto ;,` AGGREGATE A`RiECTURE) ; Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 93 1 95 1 83 2 v 4 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 78 3 90 2 87 1 6 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 81 2 78 3 83 2 `=c` 7 3 CRAVEN,THOMPSON& ASSOCIATES.INC. I 76 4 61 6 82 4 14 4 MILLER LEGG& ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 5 65 5 77 5 15 5 CHEN MOORE AND • ASSOCIATES,INC. 70 6 69 4 70 6 'r_ 16 6 146 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 4 For Group 2, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received for General Architecture, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, and Historical Preservation Architecture. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 2 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning (Group 2) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. GENERAL+ARCHITECTURE 4,1i) �u Rogelio Valria r AGGREGATE ATE (GE / iC 'r Deborah ; Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE& INTERIOR DESIGN,INC. 95 1 92 3 90 4 8 1 GLAVOVIC STUDIO,INC. 88 3 85 8 98 1 12 2 M.C.HARRY&ASSOCIATES, 0. INC. 94 2 89 7 93 3 12 2 STANTEC CONSULTING p,. n, SERVICES.INC. 87 4 95 1 86 7 12 2 BEA ARCHITECTS,INC. 85 6 90 6 95 2 14 5 BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 92 3 88 5 15 6 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC. 80 10 93 2 88 5 17 7 WOLFBERG ALVAREZ AND PARTNERS,INC. 84 7 91 5 80 8 20 8 R.J.HEISENBOTTLE , ARCHITECTS,P.A. 87 4 78 9 75 10 i;,- 23 9 SBLM ARCHITECS,P.C. 84 7 74 11 80 8 26 10 RODRIGUEZ ARCHITECTS,INC. 71 11 69 13 75 10 34 11 CPH,INC. 57 12 75 10 65 13 35 12 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 57 12 70 12 55 14 38 13 CIMA ENGINEERING CORP. 56 14 66 14 70 12 . : 40 14 TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE wR.tFQ#ZO14-34&'-YG.: s. ,'Archltecturaand ' LOW ';; -:;.:Engineering Se�ices,?' Deborah Rogelio Vaieria P AGGREGATE F$„',:(TOWN LANN NG) . Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking ,,•• TOTALS Rank ZYSCOVICH,INC. 97 1 84 1 100 1 r?, 3 1 THE CORRADINO GROUP 75 2 76 2 83 24 6 2 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE F $2Q 4r .ns� i. Err a idba t_oW '�> '��� �r Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE f+ilfSEEtJ!C;t4 Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking ” TOTALS Rank R.J.HEISENBOTTLE ! '��jr ARCHITECTS,P.A. 100 1 99 1 i 90 1 , t 3 1 WILLIAM B MEDELLIN 5; ARCHITEC P.A. 93 3 97 2 j 90 1 - 6 2 DOUGLAS WOOD II _•, ASSOCIATES,INC. 96 2 91 3 75 4 '4 9 3 BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS s'._ ARCHITECTS.P.A. 83 4 84 4 I 80 3 11 4 147 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 5 For Group 3, the Committee convened on March 31, 2015 to consider proposals received for Civil Engineering and Land Surveying. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 3 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. CIVIL ENGINEERING RFQ 21}t4-3 6-YG Profesaionai; . :.iArchitectural arts Engineering Low s ,- Sere** - Brian Jose A. Pedro ,AGGREGATE (CIYiL ENGINEERING) sM Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking ; TOTALS Rank WADE TRIM,INC. 95 2 97 1 81 8 11 1 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, I INC. 90 4 90 6 91 2 12 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 10 90 6 96 1 17 3 PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES,INC. 86 8 89 8 89 3 19 4 SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOCIATES, INC. 96 1 95 3 62 24 '', I 28 5 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 84 9 82 15 84 5 29 6 , BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 75 17 93 4 79 9 30 7 R.J.BEHAR&COMPANY.INC. 88 6 83 14 77 10 F' 30 7 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 94 3 87 11 70 18 32 9 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 76 15 96 2 71 17 34 10 CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 76 15 80 17 86 4 36 11 CPH,INC. 78 13 86 12 74 11 36 11 MILIAN,SWAIN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 87 7 88 9 67 20 "' 1 36 11 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 75 17 88 9 74 11 37 14 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 90 4 74 22 73 13 39 15 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 71 21 81 16 83 6 43 16 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 72 20 91 5 69 19 - 44 17 LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS&NEWMAN, INC. 79 12 70 26 82 7 45 18 HAKS ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 80 11 75 21 72 16 48 19 EAC CONSULTING,INC. 77 14 73 23 73 13 50 20 THE CORRADINO GROUP 71 21 78 18 73 13 52 21 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 74 19 84 13 65 22 54 22 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, I INC. 70 23 76 20 64 23 66 23 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES,INC. 69 24 72 25 66 21 70 24 ROSS ENGINEERING,INC. 68 25 77 19 _ 60 26 70 24 CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. 67 26 73 23 61 25 74 26 LAND SURVEYING t j RFQ#2tlit4-346-YG '2P rofesst&rlat Arahftectural`anc ; r( ` :',.gnginteet :;Ser esrc�.lx�; LOW f < Brian Jose A. Pedro AGGREGATE ' .LAS: IJRI Y�IG}.` Y Bellino Ranking Perez Ranking Fuentes Ranking TOTALS Rank SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN& ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 96 1 80 2 4 1 TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING,INC. 91 2 93 2 77 4 8 2 KEITH AND SCHNARS,P.A. 87 3 83 7 83 1 '3;: 11 3 BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY,INC. 83 7 87 3 79 3 - 13 4 CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 86 4 84 6 69 5 15 5 ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES 85 5 85 5 68 6 16 6 MARLIN ENGINEERING,INC. 84 6 86 4 63 8 . 18 7 CB&I ENVIRONMENATAL& r' INFRASTRUCTURE 75 9 82 8 67 7 24 8 MILLER LEGG&ASSOCIATES, INC. 77 8 75 9 60 9 26 9 148 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 6 For Group 4, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received for Structural Engineering and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for Group 4 resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. The proposals received under the discipline of Structural Engineering (Group 4) are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Arc4iitecturat and Engineering.Sery ", .s: LOW (MECHANICAL,Et.ECTRICAL Oniel Jose A. Sabrina A GGREGATE D'PLUMBING Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS , Rank TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. 100 1 88 1 93 1 3 1 1 Wolfberg Alvarez&Partners,Inc. 86 2 85 3 90 2 7 ( 2 RGD Associates,Inc.DBA RGD L, Consulting Engineers 73 3 87 2 85 3 8 3 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5) firms be awarded in each category. This agenda item addresses only an award recommendation for the following disciplines: Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. The proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ. Once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture. Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture. 149 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Proposals(RFP) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. June 10, 2015 Page 7 R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture. Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc. Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying. TLC Engineering For Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis. JLM/MT/AD/YG T:I AGENDA12015 1June1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Revised 6.2.2015).docx 150 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS FOR GROUP 1 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, AND GROUP 2 - TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN & SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE, AND GROUP 3 - CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING, AND GROUP 4 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS (THE "RFQ"); AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE;; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN, INC., GLAVOVIC STUDIO, INC., M.C. HARRY & ASSOCIATES, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AND BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH R. J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A., WILLIAM B MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., BENDER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WADE TRIM, INC., STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., PURE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., AND SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., TRIANGLE SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., AND CRAVEN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LAND SURVEYING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TLC ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTURE, INC., WOLFBERG ALVAREZ & PARTNERS, INC., AND RGD ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR 151 AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—GENERAL ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE,TOWN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 3—CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING SERVICES • Brian Bellino, City Surveyor, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer III, Public Works, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4— MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach 152 WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; the Committee for Group 3 convened on March 31, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the general City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law;Y g information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Chen Moore and Associates, Inc., sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., top ranked; Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., all tied as the second highest • ranked firms; BEA Architects, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil, & Partners, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., as the ninth highest ranked, SBLM Architects, P.C., as the tenth highest ranked, Rodriguez Architects, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, Inc., as the twelfth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers, Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the thirteenth highest ranked; CIMA Engineering Corp., as the fourteenth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture was as follows: Zyscovich, Inc., top ranked; The Corradino Group, second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture was as follows: R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., top ranked; William B. Medellin Architect, P.A., second highest ranked; Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Bender&Associates Architects, P.A., fourth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Wade Trim, Inc., top ranked; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc., third highest ranked, Pure Engineering Services, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., and R.J. Behar & Company, Inc., both tied as the seventh highest ranked firm, Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc., as the ninth highest ranked, Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., as the tenth highest ranked, Chen Moore And Associates, Inc., as the eleventh highest ranked, CPH, INC., as the twelfth highest ranked; Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc., as the thirteenth highest ranked; Coastal Systems International, Inc., as the fourteenth highest ranked; Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the fifteenth highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the sixteenth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., as the seventeenth highest ranked; Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc., as the eighteenth highest ranked; HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the nineteenth highest ranked; EAC Consulting, Inc., as the twentieth 153 highest ranked; The Corradino Group as the twenty first highest ranked; Robayna and Associates, Inc., as the twenty second highest ranked; Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., as the twenty third highest ranked; Miller Legg & Associates, Inc.,. as the twenty fourth highest ranked; Ross Engineering, Inc., as the twenty fifth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., as the twenty sixth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Land Surveying was as follows: Schwebke - Shiskin & Associates, Inc., top ranked; Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., second highest ranked; Keith and Schnars, P.A., third highest ranked, Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Craven Thompson And Associates, Inc, fifth highest ranked; Robayna And Associates, Inc., as the sixth highest ranked; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh highest ranked; CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., as the eight highest ranked, Miller Legg &Associates, In., as the ninth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc. top ranked; Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., second highest ranked, RGD Associates, Inc. DBA RGD Consulting Engineers, third highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the proposals received under the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering are still being reviewed by the Procurement Department to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, once the review of the proposals received under the aforementioned disciplines is complete, an agenda item will be prepared and presented at the next available City Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the Committee's rankings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in specialized categories on, an as-needed basis (the "RFQ"); authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., and Miller Legg & Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Kobi Karp Architecture & Interior Design, Inc., Glavovic Studio, Inc., M.C. Harry & Associates, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., and BEA Architects, Inc., for the discipline of General Architecture;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Zyscovich, Inc., The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Town Planning Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with R. J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A., William B Medellin Architect P.A., Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Bender & Associates Architects, P.A., for the discipline of Historical Preservation Architecture; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Wade Trim, Inc., Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., PURE Engineering Services, Inc., and Schwebke = Shiskin &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke - Shiskin & 154 Associates, Inc., Triangle Surveying and Mapping, Inc., Keith and Schnars, P.A., Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc., and Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Land Surveying; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with TLC Engineering for Architecture, Inc., Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners, Inc., and RGD Associates, Inc. d/b/a RGD Consulting Engineers for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2015. ATTEST: Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Philip Levine, Mayor T:\AGENDA\20151June1PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Reso.docx APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION 3 -‘5 City Attorney Date 155 • • • . '.THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK •• - • • . 156 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29068 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., - ZYSCOVICH, INC., AND THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., URS CORPORATION, E-SCIENCES, INC., CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES, INC., STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC., THORNTON TOMASETTI, INC., BRINDLEY PIETERS & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND BCC ENGINEERING, FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED FIRMS, THE ADMINISTRATION IS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHER RANKED FIRMS IN ORDER OF RANK IN EACH CATEGORY; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG (the RFQ) was issued on September 18, 2014, with an opening date of December 2, 2014; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on October 1, 2014 and on October 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from a total of fifty-one (51)firms; and WHEREAS, because of the magnitude of the scope of the RFQ, including all the service categories requested, the Administration will evaluate and make recommendations for award by category group; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering; and WHEREAS, this resolution only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 054-2015, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which included evaluation committee members for each category group; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") for Groups 1, 2, and 4 consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 —PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach; and GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach WHEREAS, the Committees convened to consider the proposals, as follows: the Committee for Group 1 convened on February 26, 2015; the Committee for Group 2 convened on March 19, 2015; and the Committee for Group 4 convened on April 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Committees were provided an overview of the project; information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law; general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committees were instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFC ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., second highest ranked; Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., third highest ranked, Zyscovich, Inc., fourth highest ranked; The Corradino Group, Inc., fifth highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 1- Environmental Engineering was as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., top ranked; URS Corporation, second highest ranked; E-Sciences, Inc., third highest ranked, CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., fourth highest ranked; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., fifth highest ranked; GFA International, Inc., and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., are tied as the sixth highest ranked; Cummins Cederberg, Inc., eighth highest ranked, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 2 - Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture was as follows: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc., top ranked; Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., second highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Group 4 - Structural Engineering was as follows: Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., top ranked; Stanley Consultants, Inc., second highest ranked; Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., third highest ranked; Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., fourth highest ranked; BCC Engineering, Inc., fifth highest ranked; CES Consultants, Inc., sixth highest ranked, and HAKS Engineers Architects and Land Surveyors, P.C., as the seventh highest ranked; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code, which states that in the award of contracts the following, shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract; and WHEREAS, after careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovich, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, for the discipline of Structural Engineering; further, should the Administration be unable to negotiate an agreement with any of the recommended firms, the Administration is authorized to negotiate • with other ranked firms in order of rank in each category; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this I day of ,J4 2015. ATTEST: At' L f, e R.fael . Granado Cit ..,,f' 1 B �h414 flip r -vin ay;�r • 11; "'' Vie•'"•'•f • T:IAGENDA120151July1PR000RE 014 •r.-YG • 4' si6nal Ar itectural and Engineering Services-Reso(Plan,Urban Design,Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).do INCORP ORATED= 140 I ' it; •-••• H 26 . APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE. • &FOR EXECUTION ag.tox.,( City Attorney Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration issued RFQ 2014-346-YG to seek the proposals from consultants to provide Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis, for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The RFQ was approved for issuance by the City Commission on September 17, 2014. The RFQ was released on September 18, 2014. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the City received proposals from fifty-one (51)firms. Via Resolution 2015-29041 passed and adopted June 10, 2015, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the disciplines of Landscape Architecture, General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture, Historical Preservation Architecture, Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines: Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. After reviewing the submission, the Evaluation Committee's rankings of proposals received and the City Code, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and the City Commission, pursuant to RFQ No. 2014-346-YG, for Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An-Needed-Basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the Proposers recommended for each discipline as noted beginning on page 5 of the attached memorandum. In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. Further, the City Manager recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an Agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: N/A Financial Information: Source of Amount Account • Funds: 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. ()BPI City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, Extension 6641 Sign-Offs: D: •artment Director Assistant City Manager City ; . •er AI EC.fL.DM MT JL T:IAGEN••00151July1PROCUREME T12N 014- 46-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Sum - (Plan, Urban Design, Env Eng, t Design,Structural Eng).docx MAMI BE AGENDA ITEM C�� MIAMI BEA H City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139, .miomibeachfl.gov C MMISSIO Comm'1MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of he City sion FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2014-346-YG, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN AS-NEEDED-BASIS, FOR THE DISCIPLINES OF PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INTERIOR DESIGN AND SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Streamline The Delivery Of Services Through All Departments BACKGROUND Since June 9, 2010, the City has had contracts pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 01-09/10 with various firms for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This contract provides access to architecture and engineering (A & E) firms in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida, Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Mayor and City Commission approved the recommendation of the Administration to exercise the last option for renewal of one (1) year, which extended the contract until September 29, 2014. Resolution 2014-28743, P assed and adopted September 17, 2014, authorized the issuance of a new RFQ for professional architectural and engineering services in specialized categories on an "as-needed-basis". This resolution further authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Contracts executed pursuant to RFQ 01-09/10 to authorize month-to- month extensions until such time as a new RFQ process was completed and new contracts were executed. RFQ PROCESS On September 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis". On September 18, 2014, the RFQ was issued. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on October 1, 2014. An additional pre-proposal conference was also held on October 13, 2014. RFQ responses were due and received on December 2, 2014. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 2 The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following fifty-one (51)firms: AECOM Technical Services Marlin Engineering Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. McHarry Associates BCC Engineering, Inc. Miller Legg BEA Architects MSA (Milian, Swain &Associates, Inc.) Bender&Associates Architects Pure Engineering Services Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. R.J. Behar& Company, Inc. Brindley Pieters &Associates RAI CB&I Environmenatal & infrastructure Reines & Straz CES Consultants, Inc. RGD Chen Moore and Associates RJ Heisenbottle CIMA Robayna and Associates Coastal Systems International, Inc. Ross Engineering CPH, Inc. SBLM Architecs Craven Thompson and Associates Schwebke - Shiskin &Associates, Inc. Cummins Cederberg, Inc. Stanley Consultants Douglas Wood Stantec EAC Consulting, Inc. The Corradino Group ELA Architects Thorton Tomasetti E-Sciences TLC Engineering GFA International, Inc. Triangle Surveying Map Glavovic Studio URS Corporation HAKS Wade Trim Keith and Schnars, P.A. William B Medellin Architect P.A. Kimley Horn Wolfberg Alvarez and Partners Kobi Karp Zyscovich Architects Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. On June 10, 2015, via Resolution 2015-29041, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the City Manager's recommendation pertaining to the ranking of proposals for the following disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Landscape Architecture; Group 2 - General Architecture, Town Planning Architecture and Historical Preservation Architecture; Group 3 - Civil Engineering and Land Surveying; and Group 4: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. This agenda item only addresses an award recommendation for the following remaining disciplines/groups: Group 1 - Planning and Urban Design Architecture and Environmental Engineering; Group 2: Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture; and Group 4: Structural Engineering. On February 5, 2015, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 054- 2015, which included evaluation committee members for each category group. The Evaluation Committee (the"Committee")for these groups consisted of the following individuals: GROUP 1 — PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • Margarita Wells, Environment and Sustainability Specialist, Building Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Humberto Cabanas, Division Director, CIP, City of Miami Beach Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 3 GROUP 2—INTERIOR DESIGN/SPACE PLANNING ARCHITECTURE • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Valeria Mejia, ADA Coordinator, Property Management, City of Miami Beach GROUP 4—STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • Sabrina Baglieri, Sr. Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach • Oniel Toledo, Construction Manager, Public Works, City of Miami Beach • Jose Perez, Capital Projects Coordinator, CIP, City of Miami Beach For Group 1 — Planning and Urban Design Architecture, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (PLANNING&URBAN Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE DESIGN) Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 95 1 93 1 3 1 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 82 2 88 2 87 3 7 2 BERMELLO,AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 79 5 78 3 88 2 10 3 ZYSCOVICH,INC. 80 4 78 3 85 4 11 4 THE CORRADINO GROUP,INC. 82 2 75 5 81 5 12 5 Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 4 For Group 1 — Environmental Engineering, the Committee convened on February 26, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as below_. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services• LOW • (ENVIRONMENTAL Margarita Rogelio Humberto AGGREGATE . ENGINEERING) Wells Ranking Madan Ranking Cabanas Ranking • TOTALS Rank KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A. 96 1 99 2 94 1 4 1 URS CORPORATION 93 2 100 1 88 4 7 2 E-SCIENCES,INC. 89 4 80 4 89 2 10 3 CB&I ENVIRONMENTAL& INFRASTRUCTURE,INC. 92 3 88 3 87 5 11 4 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 83 5 79 6 89 2 13 5 GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 6 80 4 76 8 18 6 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES,INC. 82 6 79 6 83 6 18 6 CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC. 61 8 57 8 80 7 23 8 For Group 2—interior Design and Space Planning, the Committee convened on March 19, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering Services LOW (INTERIOR DESIGN& Deborah Rogelio Valeria AGGREGATE_ SPACE PLANNING) Tackett Ranking Madan Ranking Mejia Ranking TOTALS Rank BERMELLO AJAMIL& PARTNERS,INC. 92 1 92 1 88 1 3 1 EDWARD LEWIS ARCHITECTS,INC. 78 2 73 2 _ 70 2 6 2 I Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2014-346-YG, for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 5 For Group 4—Structural Engineering, the Committee convened on April 8, 2015 to consider proposals received to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process for the proposals received resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated below. RFQ#2014-346-YG Professional Architectural and Engineering LOW Services Oniel Jose A. Sabrina AGGREGATE (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) Toledo Ranking Perez Ranking Baglieri Ranking TOTALS Rank DOUGLAS WOOD ASSOCIATES,INC. 100 1 94 1 94 4 6 1 STANLEY CONSULTANTS,INC. 100 1 91 3 96 2 6 1 THORNTON TOMASETTI,INC. 97 3 90 4 97 1 8 3 BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES, INC. 95 4 92 2 93 5 11 4 BCC ENGINEERING,INC. 90 5 89 5 95 3 13 5 CES CONSULTANTS,INC. 70 6 86 6 77 7 19 6 HAKS ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS AND LAND SURVEYORS,P.C. 60 7 80 7 78 6 _ _ _ 20 7 Because of the large number of response for certain disciplines and the projected volume of work, staff is recommending that no more than five (5)firms be awarded in each category. MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE & RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has considered the proposals received, the results of the evaluation committee process and Section 2-369 of the City Code which states that in the award of contracts the following shall be considered: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. (2) Whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. After careful review of the above, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: Keith and Schnars, P.A., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Zyscovicli, Inc., and The Corradino Group, Inc., for the discipline of Planning and Urban Design Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Keith and Schnars, P.A., URS Corporation, E-Sciences, Inc., CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Engineering. Edward Lewis Architects, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture. The City Manager does not recommend an award to Bermello, Ajamil & Partners in this group because of pending litigation with the City. Douglas Wood Associates, Inc., Stanley Consultants, Inc., Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc., and BCC Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. Commission Memorandum Accepting the Recommendation of the City Manager Pertaining to the Ranking of Proposals pursuant to Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2014-346-YG,for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services In Specialized Categories On An As-Needed-Basis. July 8, 2015 Page 6 In the event that the Administration is unable to negotiate a mutually agreeable with any of the recommended firms, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to negotiate with other ranked firms, in order of rank, in each category. The City Manager further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized, on an as needed basis for the disciplines of Planning and Urban Design Architecture, Environmental Engineering, Interior Design and Space Planning Architecture, and Structural Engineering. JLM/MT DM/ EC/AD/YG T:\AGENDA12015\July\PROCUREMENT12014-346-YG RFQ-Professional Architectural and Engineering Services-Memo(Plan,Urban Design, Env Eng,Int Design,Structural Eng).docx • • ATTACHMENT B • - REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) • • • • • • • 34 • MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach,1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 8 _ REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS"(the"RFQ") NOVEMBER 4 NO ER2 24,2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME.As a reminder to all Proposers, the deadline for the receipt of proposals is UNTIL 3:00 P.M, ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. ANSWERS TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Proposer dropped off two proposal packages on November 4, 2014. Proposer received Addendum 7 and read that the due date has been extended to December 2. Proposer would like to know if it is okay to leave the package in the Procurement office `til then. Proposer also wanted to know that since its packages were dropped off on November 4, 2014, if Proposer's signature on the addendums is not required for Addendums 4, 5 &6. Al: Proposers who have already submitted their Proposal package, prior to the release of Addendum No. 7, may leave their Proposal package in the Procurement Department. To acknowledge receipt of Addendums 4 through 8 (which includes this addendum), Proposers may submit a revised Page 4 from Appendix A in a sealed envelope to the Procurement Department. Or, Proposers may also wait for the Proposal evaluation period when the Procurement Department will request any missing documentation from the Proposer, which will include acknowledgement of published addendums. Q2: Some clarification is still needed on Question#71 in Addendum No. 7. If using a 330 form for TAB 2, Section 2.1 /2.2 — Do we need to re-arrange the order of the 330 form to reflect the order requested? The answer provided in Addendum No. 7 does not clarify the way it should be arranged. Can a clause page be included before these sections that states: "Sections 2.1 and 2.2 are covered in the following 330 form" instead of re-arranging the order of the standard 330 form? A2: The order of Standard Form 330 should not be re-arranged. As indicated in Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ, "Proposers may submit the below requested information utilizing the enclosed Standard Form 330 — Architect-Engineer Qualifications". In its response, Proposer may include a page indicating that the information requested in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2 is shown in Standard Form 330 and immediately following include the completed form. Proposer shall indicate which sections of Standard Form 330 correspond to Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Tab 2. Page 1 of 2 2 ( Miami Beach ADDENDUM NO.8 RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Q3: Would you consider re-formulating this RFQ from scratch and putting out a new deadline? This might serve both the City's and the potential proposers' interests best. A3: No, the City will not consider this option. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 , YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro••- - , l -4 ;V I Denis Procurement Director MiAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT Tel: 305-673.7490 Fox: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS"(the "RFQ") NOVEMBER 18, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. DELETION. The following specialized areas of the RFQ have been deleted: "Geotechnical", under Group B—Engineering, from Section 0200, Sub-Section 2. Purpose. "Acoustics, Noise Abatement'from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. "Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring"from Appendix C, Sub-Section C2., Scope of Work. 3. ADDITION.The following clause has been added to Appendix D—Special Conditions: 13. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers &contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means &methods or product specifications that are considered"sole source" or restricted without prior written approval of the City. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: Q1: TAB 2 reads that proposers may submit the information requested under that Tab utilizing the SF330. Then item 2.1 of said Tab asks for 5 projects performed by the firm in the last five years. The SF 330 instruction usually allows for users to provide 10 projects. Does this mean the City is asking for 10 projects, or is it limiting the projects to 5? Could you please clarify? Al: Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item 2.1, the Proposing Firm is only required to "submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience;"It is up to the Proposer's discretion should they want to list more than five relevant projects. 1 Q2: Section C1. Minimum Requirements under Appendix C, the first bullet states "Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects for public sector agencies." Please clarify the City's definition of "successfully completed". Is this completion of the design or substantially completed in construction? A2: Successfully completed refers to successful completion of the project in the design phase. Q3: Are complete AlE teams, including sub-consultants, required for this RFQ submission? Due to the fact that the specific projects to be awarded under all categories are unknown at this time, as well as the fact that this is a minimum three-year contract term,we strongly feel it would be in the City's best interest to allow prime firms to submit without sub- consultants in order to allow future flexibility in selecting the best possible sub-consultant team for each specific task order's scope. A3: In accordance with Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3—Approach and Methodology, `It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." After award of contract, the prime Proposer would be allowed to add sub-consultants for each specific task as necessary and approved by the City through the City Manager. Q4: Do Form Based Code services fall under the Town Planning or Planning and Urban Design category. A4: Form based code services are not being sought at this time. Should a need arise in the future, the City may consider all its options, including (but not limited to) selecting a consultant pursuant to this RFQ or releasing a separate solicitation. Q5: Please provide copies of all sign in sheets scanned and have them sent out as an addenda as soon as possible. A5: Sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal conferences are attached to this addendum. Q6: At the pre-proposal conference, several firms asking for a deadline extension, especially because there is still the lingering question about team and grouping within a category or in multiple categories. We certainly would like to be informed of a deadline extension, as it could possibly impact the decision of small firms to pursue this solicitation. A6: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q7: If we submit for more than one category, are we going to have to prepare a proposal for each or can we submit together(one proposal for all applicable categories)? A7: Per RFQ Section 0300--Submittal Instructions and Format, sub-section 3: Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective 2 group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning, Q8: Can we use our SF-330 which has the colors of our firm but is the exact same form? A8: Yes, that is allowed as long as the structure and contents of the form has not changed. Q9: We provide GIS services but have no Survey Department, can we submit a proposal or will you create a separate category for GIS? A9: Per this RFQ, the GIS services are limited to Survey and collecting GIS features. The City anticipates creating a separate broader GIS RFQ in the future. Q10: Will the relevant experience still be completed projects or can ongoing projects be included (discrepancy between page 12 and Appendix C) A10: Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q11: To follow up on the discussion at yesterday's Pre-Bid meeting,we would like to know if we can submit for Multiple Categories in one package. For example: Civil and Environmental in Group B - Engineering. This would greatly reduce the work effort (not to mention excess paper!) for both the City and the consultants. If this is not possible, then we respectfully request that you consider a time extension to allow firms adequate time to prepare numerous submissions. All: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q12: Please indicate teaming restrictions, if any, on sub-consultants.Thank you. Al2: Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, `It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted.': As indicated above, Proposers must clearly indicate in their proposal which sections of the scope will be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Q13: Section 0300 3. Statements of Qualifications Format. Tab 1 - Item 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements (a), Requires LEED, ULi, AICP,APA Certifications for Planning, Urban and Historical Preservation Architects. Please clarify why Historic Preservation architects require such certifications. A13: Please note that, pursuant to Appendix C, section C1. Minimum Requirements, Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is a preference and not a requirement. As such, firms that do not have architects certified by or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA will not be penalized. 3 Q14: Please clarify the ambiguity in the RFQ 2014-346-YG as to teaming: whether an architectural firm can submit as a lead firm with a roster of subconsultants who, together, cover specialties in both of the listed areas. Also, please clarify whether subconsultants can, in their turn, use specialty subconsultants to cover any gaps in their own team's expertise. A14: While proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." Q15: Regarding the RFQ for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis", will there be an additional addendum published addressing the teaming clarification that was brought up during the first pre-proposal meeting? The second meeting is not until 10113 and the RFQ packages are due on 10/23; this is a very small time-frame to gather a team if need be. A15: Please refer to the answer written for Question #3 and #14 in this addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q16: For submission for Environmental Engineering, the City states per the RFQ that it is searching for submissions in the following sub-categories: general environmental services, environmental & coastal permitting, and contamination assessment. According to your Environmental Department representative, the City prefers for a firm to do this in- house, correct? If we cannot do all these 3 services in-house, can we submit just to the 1 service that we are able to do in-house, or does the City prefer that we team with sub- consultants to be able to submit for all 3 services under Environmental Engineering? A16: In accordance with RFQ Page 13, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." In accordance with the above language, the City prefers that Proposers perform services in- house (with its own forces); however should they be unable to, Proposers must indicate which sections of the scope will be subcontracted. Q17: Under section C2. Scope of Work required, does Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under the Civil Engineering discipline? A17: Yes, Coastal Engineering and Coastal Surveys fall under Civil Engineering. Q18: Please confirm that if we are to submit to Civil and Environmental Engineering, that the City requires 2 separate proposals. A18: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 4 Q19: The question is regarding whether the City expects a complete team to be put together for each of the categories depending on the types of projects. For example, if the City intends on doing a pump station project under the Civil Group, do we need to include electrical and mechanical resumes or firms on our team for that category? A19: As part of their submittal, a Civil Engineering firm may include in its proposal qualifications of mechanical and electrical engineers. Please note however, per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, `It is 9 P 9 the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm(with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q20: Is a submittal required for each category a firm may be interested in under Groups A&B'? A20: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q21: Are firms permitted to develop a comprehensive team for each category. A21: Please refer to the answer written for Question#3 and #14 in this addendum. Q22: Are there teaming restrictions? Can a prime firm go as a subconsultant to a firm for any category? A22: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 12 in this Addendum. Q23: I have an inquiry regarding what defines the "General" under the Group A - Architecture Category. Is there a list breakdown of services that can be provided to demonstrate/define "General"? A23: General Architecture is defined as the planning, programming, design, preparation of construction documents, permitting and construction supervision for single and multi-purpose facilities and their sites. These facilities may include, but may not be limited to: parking garages, park facilities, fleet maintenance and storage buildings, etc. Q24: At the top of Page 13 of RFQ 2014-346-YG it indicates that a copy of staff's accredited college diploma or bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field should be provided for Environmental Engineering Firms. I have two questions: Can a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate satisfy this criteria as Florida licenses PEs only with degrees in engineering from accredited schools? Will an official transcript or other documentation from the school suffice in lieu of a copy of a diploma if that transcript/document clearly states that the individual received a bachelor's degree in an environmental science or related field? A24: Yes, a Florida licensed Professional Engineer's certificate may be provided. Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must provide copies of the following: Staff's accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. Q25: It is a burden on the firms to submit multiple proposals for one, the architecture and engineering categories and then also for the subcategories. It will also slow down the review process by the City. Will the city consider providing a check list for areas of interest and in which the firms are qualified for and for it to be included in the proposal? 5 A25: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q26: The RFQ states that Landscape Architects must be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and FNGLA. These are not certifications normally held by Landscape Architects. Can an ISA certified Arborist be added as a sub consultant to satisfy this requirement? A26: Yes. Q27: If the submitting firm desires to submit proposals for multiple categories, would the City consider allowing the submitting firm to submit one proposal in which the firm describes what categories they may qualify for? It is not clear in the RFP if the City's intent is for submitting firms to form teams. For example, it is typical for a Civil engineering firm to submit as part of its team a surveyor and geotechnical firm that they have a working relationship with. Is it the City's intent to pair firms qualified under separate categories to complete a task order under this contract? Furthermore, the RFP encourages that the submitting firm should self-perform the work proposed under the desired category, however it goes on to encourage the use of DBE sub-consultants. This is somewhat contradictory, Please clarify? A27: Please refer to the answer written for Question#3, #7, and #14 in this Addendum. Q28: If the instructions in the RFQ prevail and proposers are to submit one individual proposal (1-originall1l copies) per discipline, would the City consider giving an extension of the current deadline or staggering the due dates for each the disciplines (e.g. civil, structural, environmental, mechanical etc)? A28: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q29: Will a State issued DBE certification suffice as"verifiable evidence" of Proposer's intent to use DBEs on this contract'? A29: Yes. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology, "Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration(SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County." Q30: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of Proposing Firm", Tab 2-Section 2.1, need to be completed? A30: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q31: Do the 5 projects being requested as "Qualifications of the Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers)Tab 2-Section 2.2, need to be completed? A31: Yes. Per Appendix C, Section C.1, Minimum Requirements, the relevant project experience must be for successfully completed projects. Q32: Is it the intent of the RFQ that submitting firms only show 5 relevant projects in the SF 330, as requested in Tab 2-Section 2.1? 6 A32: Please refer to the answer written for Question#1 in this Addendum. Q33: In speaking to D & B they say an SQR is not something most people are subscribed, but a Comprehensive Report can substitute in many cases since they are similar. Is the SQR mandatory or is there an alternative? A33: The submittal of the SQR is mandatory. Per Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.3, "Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun &Bradstreet." Q34: Is the 2nd underlined area a repetitive requirement of theist underlined area? Or are you requesting 2 different sets of five (5) relevant projects? RFQ Page 12 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five(5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5)years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members'qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five(5) relevant projects, performed in the last five(5)years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. A34: The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.1 are applicable to the "Proposing Firm". The requirements indicated in Page 12 of the RFQ, Tab 2, Item # 2.2 are applicable to the "Architect and Engineer"in each firm/team. Q35: If we are to have D&B send the SQR directly to the City what information should we include in this tab for our submittal? 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. A35: Given that the SQR must be submitted directly to the Procurement Contact named in the RFQ, Proposers are not required to include information in their proposal under Item # 2.3 of Tab 2, Page 12 of the RFQ. Q36: Do relevant projects have to be completed projects or can they be currently in progress? A36: Please refer to the answer written for Question# 10 in this Addendum. 7 Q37: Under Section C1. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Planning, Urban, and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI, AICP, APA is preferred. However, since this is the City's preference and not a minimum requirement, if the firm does not hold any of these certifications will the proposal be deemed non-responsive and not be considered? A37: No, this is a preference and not a requirement. Q38: Given that many firms will be able to Prime various disciplines in Group A and Group B, would the City consider changing the requirements in the current RFQ and requesting that one proposal address all the disciplines for which the firm is able to Prime? A38: Please refer to the answer written for Question#7 in this Addendum. Q39: Our firm is submitting proposals in four disciplines and our corporate offices are questioning the need for 4 separate Dun & Bradstreet SQR Reports. Can we submit one for the firm since they are costly, and the information will be the same on all four? A39: Yes. Q40: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then will the City be providing the coordination between disciplines or will one of the twelve firms be required to provide the overall coordination? A40: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected by the City from the appropriate specialization list. The prime proposer will be responsible to hire the applicable or required sub-consultants and coordinate the work. Q41: If the City intends to select twelve separate firms, then why does the sample contract call for written approval of all sub-consultants? A41: Please note that the City does not intend to select only twelve separate firms(firm per specialized area). Multiple firms may be qualified per category. Proposers are not precluded from including sub-consultants as part of its team. Per Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted." As indicated in the last part of the above cited language, Proposers shall indicate the sections of the services the Proposer intends to sub-contract. Q42: If the City intends to select A/E Teams already put together by the Consultant, then why does the RFQ require each discipline to submit separate proposals? This would result in twelve (12) original proposals and one hundred and twenty (120) copies be submitted for one full AlE Team of all disciplines. A42: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. 8 Q43: Is it the City's intent to select Architecture/ Engineering Teams for this contract or to make twelve (12) separate selections of firms, one for each discipline listed on page 3 of the RFQ and require these twelve firms to work together as a team? Of course a firm could be selected for more than one discipline... A43: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. Q44: Is it possible to get a copy of the attendee list for both pre-proposal meetings or will they be posted online? A44: Copies of the sign-in sheets for both pre-proposal meetings are attached to this Addendum. Q45: If a firm was interested in pursuing Park work, which category should they submit under, "Landscape" or"Planning and Urban Design"? A45: A firm may submit under both categories. A firm designing a Park, will need to have planners/urban designers. If the firm is only interested in doing the landscaping for the Park, then they may submit under Landscape only. Q46: We will be submitting for the Civil category with subs that will be needed to carry out the task. How will our proposal be evaluated in relation to the proposal submitted by an architectural team who will have sub-consultants which may also include civil? A46: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria stipulated in Section 0400—Statements of Qualifications Evaluation, Page 14 of the RFQ. Q47: Tab 2 (Section 2.2- Qualifications of Proposer Team) — Do we have to provide 5 relevant projects for each of the sub-consultants on our team? A47: Section 2.2 of Tab 2 indicates: "For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ." If the sub- consultant team includes architects and engineers, then Proposer shall also list five (5) relevant projects in the last five (5) years for public sector clients. Q48: Minimum Qualifications Requirements, C1 Minimum Requirements. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. -Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. Are Landscape Architects are specifically required to have all three additional certifications? Typically the Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License will suffice in lieu of these requirements. A48: The Florida Department of Business Landscape Architecture Professional Regulation License is acceptable. 9 Q49: We will be submitting for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing — You stated that you all prefer that each discipline be submitted separately; When I submit my staff and firms qualifications for each discipline, how exactly to you all want that formatted? A49: Please refer to the "Clarification" provided in Page 1 of this Addendum. Also, please refer to RFQ Page 11, Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format. Q50: City mentioned at the second pre-proposal conference that the deadline may be pushed back — can you please tell me where I can find the answers to my questions and also see the answers to the other attendees questions? A50: This addendum contains responses to all questions received prior to the deadline for receipt of questions and clarifications. Proposer must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of this addendum. Q51: Can you tell us who will be on the selection committee? A51: This information is unknown at this moment. Q52: Page 12, Tab 1, 1.3 item d) a— it will be very difficult to obtain copies of our environmental staff's diplomas in a timely manner. Will copies of their licenses and certifications suffice? A52: Please refer to the answer provided for question#24 in this Addendum. Q53: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.1 — For each project we have to provide the "year(s) and term of engagement." What exactly are you looking for w/regards to"term of engagement"? A53: Term of engagement refers to the term (number of months or years) the firm was engaged in a particular project or assigned task. Q54: Page 12, Tab 2, 2.3 - Our accounting staff attempted to arrange for Dunn & Bradstreet to submit a SQR to you; however, the D&B site requires your "user name." Can you please provide us w/this as soon as possible? A54: The"user name" is the same as the"email address": vusbeloonzalez(miamibeachfl.gov Q55: Appendix C, C.2 Scope of Work Required — In addition to environmental and geotechnical services, our firm provides the following services that are listed in your scope of work: lab testing services as well as testing and inspection services. Typically the lab testing can fall under geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) whereas testing and inspections would fall under CMT. CMT is not listed in your RFQ. Some public entities tend to lump geotechnical and CMT together. Should we highlight these services in under geotechnical? A55: As indicated in Page 1 of this addendum, "Geotechnical" has been removed from Group B — Engineering of this RFQ. Q56: The scope also says "Any other professional services..." Our firm also offers facilities services (i.e. building envelope, roofing, waterproofing). Should we highlight this in the submittal? If so, where should we address it? Or should we just stick to the services that are under Group A& Group B? 10 A56: As indicated in Appendix C, the scope of this RFQ will include "Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)." Proposers may highlight in their response any other professional services that falls under Section 287.055, Florida. Proposers may list this information under Tab 3 —Approach and Methodology as indicated in Page 13 of the RFQ. Q57: Submitting separate books for each specialized area that apply to our firm will be not only be costly, but time consuming. Please consider allowing us to submit one book & distinguish the specialized area in each section with a sub tab labeled with that specialized area or simply by using a page break in our documents. A57: Please refer to the answer written for Question#7 in this Addendum. Q58: Can you please provide a list of the firms that are the incumbents for this contract? A58: The incumbents under the City's current agreement for these services are: AECOM USA, INC. HADONNE CORP ARCHITEKNICS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTS& ATKINS NORTH AMERICA,INC. LIVS ASSOCIATES AVINO&ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCKWOOD,ANDREWS& NEWMAN INC BCC ENGINEERING, INC MC HARRY& ASSOCIATES INC BEA ARCHITECTS, INC MILIAN SWAIN&ASSOCIATES BENDER&ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS MILLER LEGG BERMELLO,AJAMIL&PARTNERS O'LEARY RICHARDS DESIGN BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY PILLAR CONSULTANTS, INC. BORRELLI&PARTNERS,INC. RED DESIGN GROUP BRINDLEY PIETERS&ASSOCIATES ROBAYNA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BRUCE HOWARD&ASSOCIATES ROSENBERG DESIGN GROUP,INC. CALVIN,GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES SAVINO MILLER DESIGN STUDIO CASHIN ASSOCIATES PC SBLM ARCHITECTS PC CDM SMITH INC SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN&ASSOC INC CES CONSULTANTS,INC. SHULMAN&ASSOCIATES DOUGLAS WOOD&ASSOCIATES, INC TERRA CIVIL ENGINEERING E SCIENCES INCORPORATED THE RUSSELL PARTNERSHIP, INC EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMP TLC ENGINEERING FOR EDSA,INC. WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECTS FORBES ARCHITECTS ZYSCOVICH, INC. Q59: Is Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing considered one specialized category or three separate specialized categories? A59: Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumping Engineering are considered one specialized category. Q60: Please clarify which of the bulleted items described in the Scope of Work fall under each specialized category. A60: The architectural and engineering services listed in Appendix C, Section C2. Scope of Work are only a representative list of the various services the City may utilize throughout the term of the contract. After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be 11 analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q61: Due to the inadvertent error with the time of the original pre-proposal meeting, several firms have a nearly a two-week advantage with information received at the original pre- proposal meeting that many did not receive until the second pre-proposal meeting. For this reason,we are requesting a time extension for the Statement of Qualifications. A61: As indicated in page 1 of this addendum, the deadline for receipt of proposals has been extended to Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM. Proposers must be registered with Public Purchase to ensure receipt of all addenda. Q62: We understand that consultants are not allowed to cite City Employees as references in the proposal response for the above reference RFQ. We would like to receive clarification on this because based on Tab 2.1 and the SF-330 Section F, when showing project examples, we must list the Project Owner and Contact Person/Phone/E-mail. Please advise how we should address this section while still complying with the City's submittal requirements? A62: Please note that Proposers are not prohibited from citing City Employees as a contact in their proposal response for a particular project. Q63: The package stated we need to have 5 relevant project examples, can we have more than 5 Q P g p J p project sheets, or only 5 is permitted? A63: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q64: In regard to RFQ 2014-346-YG Professional Architectural & Engineering Services, the RFQ states on page 12 that you request 5 relevant projects performed in the last 5 years. However, on the SF330 form, it allows up to 10 projects to be shown. Do you wish to have a maximum of 5 projects or can we include more on the SF330 form? A64: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q65: Can we submit more than 5 project examples? A65: Please refer to answer written for Question# 1 in this Addendum. Q66: Can we suggest that a single proposal be required to cover multiple specialties but still require separate proposals for either Group A or Group B. In the cover letter we could then highlight which specialties that we are referring to within the remainder of the document. Should this be acceptable, can we increase the number of projects provided to 10 to cover the wider scope? A66: Please refer to the answer written for Question #7 in this Addendum. Q67: We understand that the City may have projects related to neighborhood improvements and possibly pump stations which would require multiple disciplines. If this type of project were to fall in the civil engineering category, would we need to include mechanical and electrical personnel in our submittal as that may be required for this type of project? A67: Please refer to the answer written for Question # 19 in this Addendum. 12 Q68: Our firm and staff are fully licensed in landscape architecture and we have certified arborists on staff so we believe we are fully qualified to meet the RFQ requirements for landscape architecture services. With these qualifications, is it still necessary to include certifications from the Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida and the FNGLA in the RFQ response? These two certifications are not typical for landscape architects to have. Can those requirements be dropped or if they can't be dropped, can they be provided through a horticultural sub consultant. A68: International Society of Arboriculture Certification is acceptable. Q69: How should we document the consultants involved in the projects presented (TAB 2.1 Page 12)?(what portions of the SF 330 should be used?) A69: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2,#2.1 -Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q70: Does Appendix E (Insurance Requirements) and F (sample contract) have to be included in the submittal? A70: No. Only the information requested under Section 0300 — Submittal Instructions and Format needs to be included in the response. Q71: Under Section 0300—Submittal Instructions and Format-TAB 2- Experience & Qualifications,we are required to submit Standard Form 330 to complete the following items: 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Should we divide the SF330 in the following order to provide our responses? To respond item 2.1 —should we include Part I -Sections, A-C; and sections F- Example Projects; G -Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects; H - Additional Information, and Part II—General Qualifications To respond item 2.2, should we include sections 0-Organizational Chart and E— Resumes of Key Personnel,to provide relevant project experience of each key staff personnel. Please clarify the proper distribution of the SF 330 Sections to provide our responses. A71: Proposers shall utilize the corresponding sections of SF3330 to document the information requested under RFQ Tab 2,#2.1 -Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Q72: Under"specialized areas: GROUP A ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design /Space Planning Civil" ....do you mean General Environmental and Interior...? And can we submit under Category A for just General Environmental? A72: The column titled "Group A —Architecture", has the following specialized areas: General, Interior Design/Space Planning, Landscape, Planning and Urban Design, Town Planning, Historical Preservation. The column titled "Group B — Engineering", as amended, has the following specialized areas: Environmental, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing, Structural, and Land Surveying Services. Please also refer to the answer written for Question # 7 in this Addendum. 13 Q73: Is it the intent of the City that if a civil engineering task arises that requires geotechnical services, the prime firm use the services of the Geotechnical firm selected as part of this procurement? A73: Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, "It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). After award, when professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. Q74: The RFQ identifies two groups (A& B) which are further broken down into 16 specialized categories (by type of service). Instructions require that respondent submit separately for each category. Our questions are as follows: a. Is the intent to award for each specialized category(minimum of 16 rewards)? b. Is the intent to award to multiple firms within a category? c. Given that each discipline must submit separately, unless providing the same specialized services, how can there be sub-consultant's under this format? A74: The City is not limited to awarding only one Proposer per specialized category. The City may award more than one Proposer per specialized category. The City will evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria indicated in Page 14 of the RFQ, Section 0400. Furthermore, as indicated Page 13 of the RFQ, Tab 3, it is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer(rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they P lan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces) and which sections are intended to be subcontracted". Q75: Group A & B defines the 16 specialty categories. Appendix `C', section C2, identifies the types of services required. There is no correlation of services to specialties. This leaves it up to each consultant to determine which services are to be provided under the category they're submitting on. This interpretation could result in an incomplete submittal and/or gaps in services provided. Is it the intent to let the consultants determine which services should be address in the specialty they are submitting for? A75: Yes. The services identified in Appendix C, sub-section C2 lists general descriptions of services that the City may need throughout the term of the awarded contract. As indicated in Page 13, Tab 3, of the RFQ, each proposer shall submit information on how it plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado©miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a propos. 046.,l � ('�� ' Denis Procurement Director 14 y, „ • t I • • • r. • • r E=PROPOSAL MEEETING SIGN-IN .SHEET OCTOB�ER 1 ,{201x. , ,1 _ i iF = j ■ ,7".,, ,. • ;15 = trA 1 A MfAM BE H� CITY OF yIIANII BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement - CMIB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelzzonzalez(i miarnibeachtl.tiov ext. 6230 �AUZ S. MASTRA?A ?.055 -k- Ag.L1Eq Nt 5 613o v YYY qSi et?cl.vo5564Y; corn feepDNDO LA-e.104 t _1.946 tJ6 1 -'t' &) L NG • 5-236-59q 3/z51- 9th -fl,fio* c. ra riI Ir1 •Com yT t.) J.. FmN M I 305 B60-3702 305-SG o 374,9 SP�vlee? befrAeitobrAiti.4ewr eta' C�,�1 � ��5 Ct �� Ali(,�.4tilt ec��`�'� ,NA Lt,,1ls C ∎NAlt I2 1A f1.c e `�� ��3 1�ti s . 74 .6177 czP 3es. G/3• 30$. Co73 . Alert, To t.G t 1� - o-z '7 .3 7 3 tAtock'tbbAc.er k.`_tnn twr..,13$4ct.FL.Goo Vt_b 11A TlirZ Dwibilfx/17iAigi t 6 ietr67eAar n yi G.• 4sz/ 954, 6'6ry-77 �� bID- 77�' ,F,veZ ). 4E4 to z4 rdearazoza� behor. test DIA Drkfl r% l LCAlr . AiRc. h r 3br 'ctgio cou4opi izeigiunp134-.4k_c .Lti 3Sa Z 9 3SO�ZS I! e6C-Ourd --, 5 el—. 11-"a5C ff0C1- r3-{-�,� C� t✓C{. MIAMIBEACH ' • • .--' - -...,:_....-... - CIT _ . _ PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING - -SIGN-INSHEET - . - - . NAME . COMPANY NAME -PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS ' . j---7- ./ p,--iii-7), Aci;:..„gr-/-2 ; ' r a/ 'j\n CY\.COQ Su(_ -C {C ( - • ..:u iv 14 62, r,),z i -.1—z-3 , ; _ - . ' F rr v,0—j o c ..kao. ,-C'.cc,:),(--b 9 ,L,Jc., _ . . .;-.: 1- /Iv\EL)Sr; •A`' AA"--‘1'1"----7r-?-- ivvv\E.y•E-1-1,..:6, ---,.--.r.2.;(,,-.5-v\cjit :4,:-L, A,". :'• "2;9 e---2),,D - s 0 0 ., S 5,7--57-'? k- - 7t�„wv �aoNAv�Q. 5 +9t.1. L . �w krill ?f//,,7'. . /Z �; !� :-5 _, - i 5--- , e y s ; •• , 61y r .. GRAr ' --.., ' . 41 361 i 7 S6) 3q/ 4116 &0J0A Aov7S°11 orj0 n.liom*ons p r a . , . _ _ . . . • s . _ . , . _ . . . • _ M1AMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI B EAC H PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 1,2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES N SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbeluonzalez(timiarnibeachfl._ov ext. 6230 Cs4 CENre,4L /,vG 005)44/-51-81 (6os)441-s494 J V///a r e csajrea f cam,-, ex i. 7368 L JDit kccoc- �l e& S (3v (40e) 5 55 00 JaSor►.Jat..•tscoslet re-{tc_t,(i1 (0.,1 --r y ,L; 0 ',Teo)trie,,,I,424/-4, 6 ��nll L. A SS �,�,� . 111 ( 5 1U0 � }�uen 1-tE: /fZJA 305- �o t E RNA D e- et,tictoclee)144,;-C ire •eorri 32.(ot !01 Ems- c1-C-c+►,LLCGE.►.LC`-�VP-0")) Lv , ^ t.Ne�eN n 73 -?o'� 5 t eu Kee* S 3 Cac,c\to \J \c c- -Pco:5,a5 - \AUGLce,_0 9 csc �• CLwfl 3'3 ?_ .al ia -Y D ii4 ►oeriet cc 3,4--trW-121,01-i G�x���•k��� Ao v'd M CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL MEETING SIGH,-Iti SHEET DATE: October 1, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRLNT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusheluonzalez( i.mlamibeacht iov ext. 6230 61/1r1 1 ct &G an iateri f nn C,,v-d3s1 40 c,t i n D G a-v.t i 40 Z b ctrlg.6.9111 (7 to /�l�% PM%iQ f1e< -F t R4ce / I - oc-)7R2s/ V-66"-5-6 ille ‘i 5-6te 71/(A. or4ia,,c,(p); ropt, so os)Sb -) ;°-9M-111�al on 0� �7 1)A. 14 ToZzi/L _ �I,�GC�VIScJ l-�Cow -YA.;56;fro- L� S Coc M\ S - 'nn mi -_,)1055 56.wa1 oan hacui h (co Sal S y'Y15‘1(1� g..4. .14 v./lope-Ltd& ! feC i4 •GO�'1 �=� 'L•- = 3o5-'672.496Z 3c 5-i, -62.33 3e,sldG - t__ct_�_1( ---5 k Vic,==L IC? p 4 3x6.14-44. 84,= ass- 7 ?u =SC 1-/77 11C"el L!'SG c c- 4-4-4e4,4% 2-4/ ...3o5 -67;33- A1ft ,/ rcrA- /B c FL - 080_ ®s.. MIA/V\ IBEACH .:,....?. ...:-.....--_,„.•- :.`-. ,.,.,.,,„-,.,..__.. ,,, ... . , ., _ J. .. , ., .:,_. ,:i.,,,, ,....., ,,,,,:---: - : :.- :-.-, ._ . :. ..,,-. , _ . .:.:__,„,...,. .. .:.y:. -,,,: :,,,J....,,. , . . CITY OF MLvII BEACH ,,; _ PRE_pROPOS,�L MEETING f. SIGN SIN S�I=EET t .: --NAME '"'Y y COMPANY NAME ONE# FAY#PLE1SEPRIVT -° { _ ) _ i 1 E-MAIL- L ADDRESS s -_ . ;, , .- ♦ ,. —w\ai,IS AS Der j spec [ n` ir�'s. �rv� : 1 = . ; - . - -I --. .- - , ..- ..),-....-T-1, t, ,,z 1 ..y.i.=_-.„--,....;t,v.,)(c.,./..,01., )4y.c44-),e,,(5-, ,,,c_,„,_ ., ,,,., a . ,, .„ „„,,,,,, ,,,,, ,,, , ,.,. ,,:. .., _.:, / 1•4.-'''1.....:' -;•:' - ..-7-' 'i-•'•'-',-''';.-:1'1 ,':.'V:`':'',,- '-'•!,- -. - . -,'- :.. '' ',•• -, •71,,b,_..y.,j -,:-''. re),',(-ci-1,1-. "),ci:/("1 0-- r -1/1,i re,,,....'iS.:.i.tiyj.,,):::_'-'.:.,,;;,',:...-'.-•',--.'•=i'_,- /. '' ''.,-,-'• i':'-'-'';''_•--':,'‘-'.'--:-',------' •,'..i'••,• ,"--- -:' .;-',,'''''''' = l ? t ' ,..--,--.- ":::-';','f - � is ., v rr - I I'• • 1 • • : . MIAMIBEACH { . _„„ - :CITY-OF M IAM I BEACH P=RE ;PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON.-THE PHONE -DATE October 14,:20:14 • ti TITLE: RFQ 2014 346-YG,=PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICE'S IN SPECIALIZED-CATEGORIES ON AN _-S-NEEDED-BASIS v�\NIE' ' COMPANY N4ME PHONE# -FA\# _ (PLEASE PRn►T) :E_M AiL •1DDRESS _ •- -Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement- CMMB • - 305=6-7.3-7000 786-394-407_3:. vusbeI onza{ez��nllarnlheachtl.(2o� = exct.6 30 Ken Boyer Douglass Wood Associates- • Jose Lopez S.cli��ebke-Shisk ri 84 Associates, Sandra Castillo Milian, Swain's Associates (305) 441 OI-23•Stcphanie;Thcard BCC Engineering (305)670 2350 hathia Dash R.J Heisenbottle Architects,P.A.' (J0))-446,7799• - Ileaila`Gonzalez • Robayna&Associates (305) 8_3 9316 Natalie: Lockwood,Andrews& Newman (305)444=6454 - _ Tom Decker Alvarez-&'Partners 305)666=547=I Victoi'.Herrera INS. (94.)'495 2`l l2 Douglass Man CB&I 561 361':3,1=I8 • • 1, MIAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING - . SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS Oft THE PHONE) _- _ NAME COMPANY NAiMIE . . PHONE # FAY# (PLEASE P1uT) - 'E-MAIL. DDRESS . Marne B ennet ham ,. :Jennifer Creed 'GOE Associates' Daniel Goodman D-EA;Architects Sherry. , - ,_MillJ er:Legg ' - " (305599-6381 . Cathy O'Leary, `,;.O'Leary Richards Design.Associates ;, (..105):.-.596:66._§, . Stephanie - Marlin Engineering (305)477-7575.= Antonio Partite: ALVAREZ=DIAZ&VILLALON 786:_497.1.906 Jake Ozyman • Haks_Engineers,"Architec,ts and Land', (212)'7474.1,997 Surveyors,P.C. _ Michael E:kC'Consulting. (.3.051,:265,5400 400 { S`haw•ii Stanley Consultants 786.76_.4 .. ,,,,i. - Mark URS Corporation - ,(305)262.7466 '•- / • alt \r . f A f.. • • H N • PRE-PROPOSAL MEEETING^*SIGN:=lNrSHEE1 = OCTOBER 13 2014 .. . �` _ � <r y.Cut x, T,....._k ti}• • • • 4 - - C tlk� f } t \ 16 ; u . , tr:i MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL'MEETING (ADDITION AL) SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASES" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIi.ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbel uonzalez(«miamibeach tl.20 ext. 6230 DAN,eGL B ei-1,vt,i-izk& Nit p 12 EA( ,. c)/v1 ::;:).s71--t- .(1 7/.71: 6 ;\�« (305 ) -'4`1 -`'-x' 6'1 NI-4L6:-Z. -�Gi01.10aL-EZ 0/% ,1;672SAL C-Nit,IAJE-E�__1, 67 z, ,9 6.,i >c& -C ` ' 3c5.24`1 ,419f --_i,_ VIA 13wn/ 505, 3 ��2 L-1.0∎11.- CA(/ri G-1- 14 6 L-0 ,. At7e-1-4-661,r✓'r• CQp15C-ctyle e /15,,,e ea-7, ; c.:>-ti , t:.l�LPL -11 Af 4 qp k_( ( L)s) i E-mE.-s e .iP . Ne-r- &??,-•39 f, -Aa:-.c_ ii ,\. mss) aL-\ -r-il-\110- C.P\t,*P+'I � ^ ,n C(�-( SL-kc.Q E (C'& -13=-i��G 'n,:t rh`liL t•L.t-t•0 @ L4 t/L it • Et fL •Sd? G., &Q.--(t , ,,, c...4 P(bc(-4) Cc4 S-3.v, �•3aZ, '� (VI, SOLE- OSWfQC C$ Vt C n,qcr( cEu@( SEgg1;R-c6akt ,GOrr\ ' te 305 LiqT2q \o‘vo -.tx_da__e o, ■Aec•cared 6 o c,( = - f a- .T:te 6 41cl 7---i 1-6Q 11Z-` -1-- Al d _j _i vim o atA'7.- '223 (r) J MIAMIBEACH , ,, , . :,.... : _,... , _.., ,,.... = CITY OF 11!I IA-1MI I•BEACH .. . .% PRE PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONL) ' SIGN-IN HT DATE: October 13 2014 TITLE • RFQ 20 14-346-tG-PROFESSIONAL:ARCHlITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING . SERVICES IN:SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON;AN''AS NEEDED-BASIS" NAME • ' " COMPANY NAME r; PHONE# 'FAX# (PLEASE PRIN'17. L E-MAIL ADDRESS ' Yusbel Gonzalez . : Procurement --•• - � �.__CVIB � �- . .�� .� :�. 305-673 7000'..: :..786-39=1-=I073 . : ekt:.6230_ tisbe l<Jonzalezijiiliamibeaihtl.Rov :: - .. G pr's' L''''',61. 6,/,;✓��°�C, . 3o - 'T1...._ /3iRA Ca if/70W?9'-. -; .,:4?-.. 1' ' - - ',''.-- :' -.-:'- .-` ',•••;r-.. _4,.? .ets:"7--`:.:,:.=::.'-:".. '''_" . 6-,v'\ - C � VC �G L. Q ti w !; c(► o v -off r--;--� wa cc cery ,. . Q . Vante-s-5.4-,:-. ILL.eiA �,free*r kt 3v5 r. ..,, , _ ::„.; 7erni 'de'Z- ,Iii-ii:($ . etm,vc(dz,� c_e co ' \ IcAlia L:..-.-ljuN:P' il - :. 'J.'. •., :. ,..,-•.; :,-,.' Yi114,• 3o S G A S X11 zabe-4-� Wa-b .. = - . eW���.�ovt a.I!i!tc t� hcar4 cl It v -°;t° ' _ 4 . • . r MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE- PROPOSAL yIEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) DATE: October 13, 2014 TITLE: RFQ 2014-346-YG—PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MLAIL ADDRESS Yusbel Gonzalez Procurement-CMB 303-673-7000 786-394-4073 vusbelgonzalez(miamibeachtl.vov ext. 6230 Lance Olsen Innovtec 352-459-1974 lance(Z&i nnovtec.com James Kahn Keith and Schnars, PA 954-776-1616 jkahn akstla.com Sharman Ciddi EAC Consulting 305-264-2557 Tom Brzezinski WadeTrim 813-882-4373 tbrzezinkskiawadetrim.com Jenny Alonso T.Y. Lin International 305-567-1888 Ext. 4034 Jennv.alonsorztvlin.com Staci L. Bolinger Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing 561-494-7006 slbo l i n<,er,ci,terracon.com William Craven Pure Technologies 407-408-7631 William.craven(i puretechltd.com Jennifer Priem GLE Associates 813-241-8350 jpriemegleassociates.com Judith A. Kemp Brindley Pieters& Associates 407-830-8700 jkempa-Dbpa-enuineers.com Helmut J. Mueller ! Mueller& Associates, LLC 305-600-9070 muellerandassociates@gmail.com gmail.com 3 tti MIAMIBEACH CITY OF y1IAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING (ADDITIONAL) SIGN-IN SHEET (PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE) NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRIrT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS Ilker Uzun CPH Corp 305-274-4805 iuzunacphcopr.com Brenda Kimley-Horn 407-398-1511 Iraldy Martin LEVS Associates 305-443-2933 imartin c livs.net Nadia E-Sciences (786) 517-2632 Rothie Franko OCI Associates (561) 688-6575 Steve Pines Bermello Ajamil & Partners (305) 859-2050 Dina CSA Group (305)461-5484 Eric Propes EDSA 954.524.3330 Jose Lopez Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. (954)435-7010 r".\ MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673.7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") NOVEMBER 12,2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M., ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Micmi Beech,Florida 33139,www.miamibecchfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fox: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") OCTOBER 31, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended UNTIL 3:00 P.M.. ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez , 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 4 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. ' ct`iee n S °rocurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO.4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") OCTOBER 17, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF QUESTIONS. The deadline for receipt of questions for this RFQ was October 14, 2014 at 5:00 PM. No more further questions will be allowed. 2. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, November 3, 2014, at the following location. Miami Beach City Hall Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A forthcoming addendum will contain answers to the questions received. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfi.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 _ YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, 3 Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the"RFQ") OCTOBER 7,2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. RFQ SOLICITATION DOCUMENT. It has been brought to our attention that some proposers are receiving an error message when attempting to download the RFQ solicitation document. Via this Addendum, the RFQ solicitation document has been re-loaded to the solicitation page in www.Dublicpurchase.com. No changes have been made to the RFQ solicitation document since it was initially published on September 18, 2014. 2. ADDITIONAL PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. Due to an inadvertent error with the time indicated for the pre-proposal conference held on October 1, 2014, an additional pre-proposal conference has been scheduled for the date, time, and location indicated below. Proposers that attended the pre- proposal conference held on October 1, 2014 are not required to attend this second pre-proposal conference. Date: October 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM Location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director Page 1 of 1 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33 i 39,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" (the "RFQ") SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. CLARIFICATION# 1: The RFQ solicitation file published on September 18, 2014 was corrupt. As such, many proposers were unable to download the RFQ document. On September 19, 2014, at approximately 8:25 AM, an updated RFQ was uploaded to the solicitation page in Public Purchase, which created "Addendum No. 1" in Public Purchase. CLARIFICATION#2: Although indicated in the RFQ solicitation document, the pre-proposal conference date, time, and location was inadvertently left out from the solicitation page in Public Purchase. This information has now been added. As a reminder to all proposers, the pre-proposal conference will take place on October 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM at the following location: City of Miami Beach City Hall -4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305-673-7000, ext. 6230 YusbelGonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete RFP No. 10-08/09 Building Development Process Fee Study Addendum#1 10/112014 Page 1 of 1 2 I Miami Beach RFQ 2014-346-SR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS' and return the `Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposa Sincere 4I penis Procurement Director REQUEST FOR QUALJHCATIONS ( RFQ PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" RFQ 2014-346-YG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: OCTOBER 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: YUSBEL GONZALEZ, CPPB MIAMI BEA H Alex Denis, Director DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 adenis @miamibeachfl.gov www.miamibeachfl.gov • MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 11 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 13 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT 33 RFQ 2014-346-YG 2 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications(RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently,the successful proposer(s)(the"contractor[s]")if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2.PURPOSE. The City of Miami Beach is accepting qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services in various professional categories on an "as-needed basis. Each proposed contract shall be for a three(3)year contract term, with two(2)one year renewal options at the City's option. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide services in each of the categories of professional specialization. When professional services are required, a proposed project will be analyzed in terms of the predominant professional specialty required, and a firm will be selected from the appropriate specialization list. In'accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the"Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Acts, the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed$2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed$200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected,and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The RFQ seeks proposals from firms with strong qualifications in the following specialized areas: GROUP A—ARCHITECTURE GROUP B—ENGINEERING General Environmental Interior Design i Space Planning Civil Landscape Geotechnical Planning and Urban Design Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Town Planning Structural Historical Preservation Land Surveying Services RFQ 2014-346 YG 3 MIAMI BEACH The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. It is the intent of this RFQ to evaluate and recommend award for each specialized category based on specific category qualifications. Firm's proposal shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B — Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture and shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 19,2014 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 1, 2014 @ 10:00 AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 14, 2014 @ 5:00 PM Responses Due October 23, 2014 @ 3:00 PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via a-mail: RafaelGranado @miamibeachfl.gov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid titlelnumber shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than seven (7)calendar days prior to the date Statement of Qualifications are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez,CPPB 305.673.7000 Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov R 2 14-3 6- R 4 1VMAAMIBEACH 5. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S).Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s)may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Solicitation Timeline above at the following address: City of Miami Beach City Hall-4th Floor City Manager's Large Conference Room 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre-submittal meeting or site visit(s). Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code, all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence."The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at: http://librarv.municode.com/index.aspx?clientlD=13097&statelD=9&statename=Florida Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director, or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: htto://web.miamibeachfl.govlprocurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES . CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 RFQ 2014-346-SR 5 tv'\1AM1BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF QUALIFICATIONS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of Statement of Qualifications and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 10. PROTESTS. Protests concerning the specifications, requirements, and/or terms; or protests after the proposal due date in accordance with City Code Section 2-371, which establishes procedures for protested proposals and proposed awards. Protests not submitted in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of City Code Section 2- 371 shall be barred. 11. MIAMI BEACH-BASED VENDORS PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No.2011-3747, a five(5)point preference will be given to a responsive and responsible Miami Beach-based proposer. 12. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No. 2011- 3748, the City shall give a five (5) point preference to a responsive and responsible proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 13. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of 9 P Statement of Qualifications, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all Statement of Qualifications. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369,including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposer (s) which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Statement of Qualifications. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including cost of services. 14.ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF RESPONSES. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Statement of Qualifications prior to award. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the Contract or reject all Statement of Qualifications within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Statement of Qualifications opening date. A proposer may not withdraw its Statement of Qualifications unilaterally before the expiration of one hundred and RFQ 2014-346-SR 6 MIAMI BEACH twenty(120)calendar days from the date of Statement of Qualifications opening. 15. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a Statement of Qualifications, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 16. COSTS INCURRED BY RESPONDENTS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Statement of Qualifications,or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 17. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. it is the intent of the City, and Proposals hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer , nor the Proposer 's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 18.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 19. MISTAKES. Proposals are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Statement of Qualifications being non-responsive. 20. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 21. PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. if the proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 22. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility.' Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or RFQ 2014-346-SR 7 MI AAA!BEACH services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the proposer,or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 23. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 24. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION. The proposer certifies that he/she is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race,color, religion,sex or national origin. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Statement of Qualifications will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposals must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances,the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successful proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. • 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 29. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 30. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation;then RFQ014-3∎6- R 8 MINOI BEACH B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to(a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 34. MODIFICATiONIWITHDRAWALS OF QUALIFICATIONS. A Proposer may submit a modified Statement of Qualifications to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Statement of Qualifications up until the Statement of Qualifications due date and time. Modifications received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and time will not be considered. Statement of Qualifications shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Statement of Qualifications due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Statement of Qualifications without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Statement of Qualifications due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 17=1411•1111111111111111- 46-SR MI,AM BEACH 35. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ.Proposals must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any,alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Statement of Qualifications. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion,may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to(as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 36. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposals shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Statement of Qualifications. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift,favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. • RFQ 2.14-346 R 10 /\ RLAM! BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically,either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Statements of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of proposals. Any pro osal received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays,natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability,facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Proposals shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A — Architecture and/or Group B— Engineering. Furthermore, firms are required to submit separate proposals for each specialized category under the respective group for which they seek qualifications. Example: a firm which provides landscape architecture and interior design/space planning, shall respond under Group A — Architecture an d shall submit two (2) proposals under said group; a proposal seeking qualifications under landscape architecture and a proposal seeking qualifications under interior design/space planning. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer, Proposer Primary Contact, Qualification Group (A and/or B), area of specialization, a summary of the Proposer's qualifications, experience, and services to be provided. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications. a) For each architect and engineer, provide copies of all applicable licenses and certifications. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. b) For Landscape Architects,provide copies of the following certifications: a. International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification c) For Planning, Urban,and Historical Preservation Architects, provide copies of the following certifications or memberships: a. LEED,ULI,AICP,APA. RFQ 2014-346-YG 11 MIAMI BEACH d) Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting,and Contamination Assessment,provide copies of the following: a. Staffs accredited college diploma or Bachelors degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications PROPOSERS MAY SUBMIT THE BELOW REQUESTED INFORMATION UTILIZING THE ENCLOSED STANDARD FORM 330—ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS(ATTACHED). 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing scope of services to public sector agencies. Proposer must submit five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of experience; the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email,and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. For each architect and engineer, include information for five (5) relevant projects, performed in the last five(5) years for public sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in this RFQ. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradst r eet to submit s Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Pr o p oser.The Proposer shall request the SQR R report from D&B at: https://suoplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. MIAMI BEACH TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For the scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. It is the objective of the City that the majority of the services defined herein be performed directly by the Proposer (rather than through sub-consultants). To evaluate compliance with this objective, proposers shall explain how they plan to accomplish this, denoting which sections of the scope shall be performed directly by the Firm (with its own forces)and which sections are intended to be subcontracted. Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available facilities, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Lastly, submit verifiable evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2614-346-SR 13 AA Air\/\I BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. Proposals will be categorized into the discipline areas noted in section 0200-2(Groups A & B) prior to evaluation by the committee in order that proposals may be evaluated by category against other proposers in that category.The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may: • review and score all Statement of Qualifications received, with or without conducting interview sessions;or • review all Statement of Qualifications received and short-list one or more Proposer to be further considered during subsequent interview session(s)(using the same criteria). Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposing Firm — Experience and Qualifications, including Financial 40 - Capability Proposing Team (Architects and Engineers) — Experience and 40 Qualifications Approach and Methodology, including Self-Performance of Work and 15 utilization of Disadvanta sad Business Enterprise DBE firms. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 95 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City 5 within the last three 3)years.See Section 4 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 _ $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 _ 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2014-346-YG 14 M IAt\A I BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C ; Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee.. Total 104 91 92 Member1 • Rank. 1 = 3 : - 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member2 Rank: 1 • 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2: = I Rank • -. . 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 *Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission,which may be different than final ranking results. RFC 2014-346-SR 15 APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Contact Tel: Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000, Ext.6230 usbel.onzalez. miamibeachfl.aov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: No of Employees: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 1 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent,sibling, and child)who is also an City employee of the Ci of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. 6. - - ''= - - - • _-- --- - -- - - - . .. - ' --- - • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 2 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami • Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest.In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified, and the applicable • definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto,or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A — Page 5 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 APPENDIX B . I\ A I A AA I BEAC H " No RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached °Stotement of No Bid," The °Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified 1,of future solicitations by the Ctly. Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S)CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service OTHER. (Please specify) We do do not—want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Yusbel Gonzalez STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2014-346-YG 1700 Convention Center Drive MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 r i� .� r. 1. •r r . _..x-. •_ .r•-•�4•. -.. ....,.. ,.. •_rvr r _ ..-r.... RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix B– Page 1 A=PPENDIX C i { ti Minimum . . e . uiremen s ,. ., ,,. , .. k,. -_, - - -, - r• - • . ... ,. . ....„ . ., ,... ...,_: ,,......,,, ,,, , . ... • ••_ .:_ . , .. . . . .. . .. C LC . ,.. ,. ...,. .., • :„.. , ...., . , . , _ .. , ,• , _ . ... . __.. .. , , , ......._ ., .. . , . _ ,. .. _ , , ,-,..,., ,, __ : . _.. , ... , ,., _ , _. _ , .. _ . _ _ a ions . . . . . . . . . _, ,. , . .. . . ,, _ ., . .. . . ... . . .... .. . . RFQ N • . • , ...,.., • . _,. PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT AND.. , : _ . . . ... .., .ENGINEERING ..... 4 . . _. ... . SERVICES IN. SPECIALIZED CATEGORiES s ... ,.. ,.. _. . _ ,,. • , ., . , _ • . - 1 ON A-N ., .,:ii . , S NEEDED BASIS.._ :--.—t 2_•. .... .. 2 ,5 ti a _ ....... _ . _ , 2 , ... . ,_.:., „.,, .. , , . , _ . , ,,. •. , _.•. _ :_—,„_ . .. s. 2..,.. _, .,_,, . . ,. ., , . . ., , - DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT: • . = - 1700 Convention Center.Drive Miami Beach,-Florida 3313.9 - • • Cl.MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall clearly indicate if qualifications are being sought under Group A—Architecture and/or Group B— Engineering. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. • Proposer must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five(5)projects for public sector agencies. • Architects and Engineers must have a minimum of five (5) years' experience and successfully completed at least five (5) projects in their designated professional specialization for public sector agencies. • Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. o Landscape Architects must be certified by International Society of Arboriculture Certification, Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Certification, FNGLA Certification. o Planning, Urban,and Historical Preservation Architects certified or members of LEED, ULI,AICP,APA is preferred. o Environmental Engineering firms providing General Environmental Services, Environmental and Coastal Permitting, and Contamination Assessment, must have staffs with accredited college diploma or Bachelor's degree in Environmental Sciences or related field. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). C2.SCOPE OF WORK REQUIRED. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms which will be contacted on an "as- needed basis" during the term of the contract. This contract will include, but not be limited to the following architectural or engineering services: Description • Acoustics, Noise Abatement • Air Pollution Control • Auditoriums and Theaters • Automation; Controls; Instrumentation • Boundary Survey • Bridges • Codes;Standards; Ordinances • Coastal Engineering(Seawall Design and Repair) • Coastal Surveys • Communications Systems;TV; Microwave RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Construction Management • Cost Estimating • Dune Planting and Management • Energy Conservation;New Energy Sources • General Environmental Services: o Environmental Assessments o Air and Water quality testing and monitoring o Environmental sustainability planning services o Environmental support services to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance • Environmental and Coastal Permitting: o Prepare and submit applications for and lead agency coordination in obtaining environmental and coastal permits; and, o Prepare supporting documentation required for environmental and coastal permits including but not limited to biological reports, flora and fauna surveys, and other environmental assessments. o Work with Federal, State, County, and other local environmental permitting agencies, including but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Miami-Dade County's Division of Environmental Resources Management. • Contamination Assessment: o Environmental Site Assessments o Oversee and coordinate remediation project o Preparation of sampling and remediation plans and other related documents o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance o Work on contamination projects in South Florida • Fire Protection • Garages;Vehicle Maintenance Facilities;Parking Decks • Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning • Highways; Streets;Airfield Paving;Parking Lots • Interior Design; Space Planning • Irrigation; Drainage • Lab Testing Services • Landscape Architecture • Lighting (Interior, Display,Theater, etc.) • Lighting(Exterior, Streets, Memorials,Athletic Fields, etc.) • Planning (Community, Regional,Area-wide and State) • Plumbing and Piping Design • Recreation Facilities(Parks, Marinas,etc.) • Rehabilitation(Buildings, Structures, Facilities,etc.) • Right-of-Way Survey • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies; OSHA Studies • Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection • Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal • Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring • Structural Design; Special Structures RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C • Surveying, Mapping,GIS,and other services: O High Definition Services(HDS) O Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) O Global Navigation Satellite Systems(GNSS) O Ground Penetration Radar(GPR) O Subsurface Utility Engineering(SUE)and Underground Utility Services O These specialized services may be utilized for surveys to include but not limited to Specific or Special Purpose, Topographic (surveys for engineering design), As- Built/Record, Boundary, Condominium, Construction Layout, Control, Hydrographic, Mean High Water, Quantity, Submerged/Filled Lands as well as GIS feature creation • Control and Data Services: o Establishing vertical and horizontal control o Researching and utilizing record documents for right-of-ways etc. Locations of all improvements, features as required in the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department Manual and/or as designated for a specific project. All field data is to be collected in digital form Point Clouds (Text XYZ Coordinate files, etc.)with horizontal and vertical control points identified and recorded in field books. The digital data shall be post processed and delivered to the City as specified herein. Survey control for Vertical Control shall be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD1988) and the Horizontal Control shall be referenced to Florida State Plane Coordinates, East Zone, North American Datum of 1983/1990 (NAD83190) supplemented with digital data files including but not limited to processed HDS and LIDAR Point Clouds with Photographics, ESRI File Geodatabases, ESRI Shapefiles (.SHP), and .DWG format drawings of the Surveys, Maps, GIS Data Sets etc. • Platting; Mapping;Flood Plain Studies • Swimming Pools • Storm Water Handling&Facilities • Testing&Inspection Services • Topo Survey • Urban Renewals; Community Development • Value Analysis; Life-Cycling Costing • Water Supply,Treatment and Distribution • Zoning;Land Use Studies • Any other professional service pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultants'Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach DSM and Florida Status(particularly surveys). The selected firms will be responsible for obtaining all State, Federal and local permits and approvals necessary for the construction of all projects, and may be required to provide consulting services to the City on various matters which do not result in drawings or specifications. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix C APPENDIX D MIAtv'\ i BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS " DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 101d 346-vG Appendix C 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three(3)years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW.Two(2) additional one (1)year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. • • ''Sk'>eSG"f:-t-`•.X,ate..- }........::..... . ....r:.i.. '2i.:.'':'T .-'-.'—s '.-.. > ..c: r ...eN. .:. v(4 c_.- K..>... _ 'I-.i .. .,1 .• ., .. ._a .. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix D—Page 1 APPENDIX E • MIAMI BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 MIAMI INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. City of Miami Beach must be shown as an additional insured with respect to this coverage. XXX 3. Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating"A"as to management and"Class V"as to financial strength or better,latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. • CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix E —Page 1 APPENDIX F MIAMI BEACH 1 Sample Contract RFQ No. 201 4-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE XXX)000000(XXX XX)0OOOOO XXXX0UUCX Resolution No. TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 19 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 20 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 25 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 26 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 26 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 27 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 38 SCHEDULE G INSURANCE AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 39 SCHEDULE H BEST VALUE AMENDMENT 40 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXX X FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING(NE) SERVICES FOR THE XXXXXXXXXX This Agreement made and entered into this_day of , 20XX, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and XXX XX, a Florida XXX)UUCXX)UUC having its principal office at XXXXXXXX)UUUUUC (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City intends to undertake a project within the City of Miami Beach, which is more particularly described in the Scope of Services attached as Schedule "A" hereto, and wishes to engage the Consultant to provide specific professional services including, without limitation, NE services, for the Project, at the agreed fees set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to contract with the City for performance of the aforestated professional services relative to the Project, as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. 1.2 CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. 1.3 CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated in writing (including the Project Coordinator) with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement(exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission or regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over any matter(s) related to the Project, the Services, and/or this Agreement). 1.4 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean Request for XXXXXXXXXXXXX No. XXXXXXXXXXX, entitled "XXXXXX XXX)UUUUCXXXXXXXX" issued by the City in contemplation .of this Agreement, together with all amendments thereto (if any), and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. 1.5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant. Any sub- consultants retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's. Any such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and sub-consultants. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not, in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the Consultant to City. Payment of sub-consultants shall be the responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Basic Services. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: XXXXXXXXXX ; )JCXXXXXXXX . 1.6 PROJECT COORDINATOR:The "Project Coordinator" shall mean the individual designated in writing by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review (on behalf of the City) all matters related to the Project during the design and construction of the Project (unless expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). 1.7 [Intentionally Omitted] 1.8 BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement (and as required to complete the Project), as further described in Article 2 and Schedule "A" hereto. In addition any Services not specifically addressed as Additional Services(as defined herein) shall be considered Basic Services. 1.9 PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project that has been approved by the City Commission and is described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.9.1 Project Cost:The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. 1.9.2 Protect Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project in Schedule"A" hereto. 1.10 CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Construction Cost" shall mean the sum which is the actual total cost to the City of the Work(as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time), including a contingency allowance for unforeseen conditions, not to exceed ten percent(10%) of the construction cost for new construction, or twenty percent(20%) of the construction cost for rehabilitation of historic buildings. For Work not constructed, the Construction Cost shall be the same as the lowest bona fide bid or competitive bid received and accepted from a responsive and responsible bidder or proposer for such Work. 1.10.1 Construction Cost Budget: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted by the City for the Construction Cost, as set forth in Schedule "A"hereto. 1.10.2 Statement Of Probable Construction Cost: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the latest approved written estimate of Construction Cost submitted by Consultant to the City, in a format approved by the Project Coordinator. For Work which bids or proposals have not been let, the Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be the same as the Construction Cost. 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or by changes in Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, codes or regulations enacted after the date of this Agreement ; or other causes beyond the parties' control which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a force majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator within five (5) business days of said force majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless additional services are required, and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 1.12 CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation,joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.13 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Schedule "A"hereto (that form the basis for which the City can receive bids for the Work included in the documents). The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the invitation to bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction [General, Supplementary, and other Conditions], Divisions 0-17, Construction Documents, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 1.14 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and with Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 1.15 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final plans, technical specifications, drawings, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, which show the locations, characters, dimensions and details of the Work to be done, and which are part of the Contract Documents. 1.16 CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment"shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or the City Manager if they are twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or less (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). Even for Contract Amendments for less than twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 1.17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which have been duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 1.18 WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, methods, procedures, etc. necessary or convenient to performance by Contractor of all duties and obligations proposed by the Contract Documents. 1.19 SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 1.20 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, and permitting fees, etc. 1.21 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include Additive Alternates or Deductive Alternates. 1.22 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. 1.23 SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C— Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D— Construction Cost Budget. Schedule E— Project Schedule. Schedule F— General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Schedule G-- Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule H— Best Value Amendment ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Schedule "A" hereto. 2.2 The Services will be commenced upon issuance of the first Notice to Proceed which shall be issued by the Project Coordinator and counter-signed by Consultant. Subsequent Notices to Proceed shall also be issued by the Project Coordinator. A separate Notice to Proceed shall be required prior to commencement of each Task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Federal, State, and local laws codes, rules and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction(s) in which the Project is located, including, without limitation, applicable Florida Statutes, and State of.Florida codes, rules and regulations, and local (City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) ordinances, codes, and rules and regulations (collectively, "Applicable Laws"). As they relate to the Services and to the Project, the Consultant agrees to comply with all such Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Coordinator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its sub-consultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule"A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services shall consist of five (5) Tasks (inclusive of planning, design, bidding/award, construction administration, and Additional Services [as may be approved]), all as further described in Schedule "A" hereto; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction(attached as Schedule "F" hereto). 2.5.1 Planning Services: Consultant shall provide planning services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 1 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Planning Services"). 2.5.2 Design Services: Consultant shall prepare Design Documents for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 2 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Design Services") 2.5.3 Bidding And Award Services: Consultant shall provide bidding and award services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 3 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Bidding and Award . Services"). 2.5.4 Construction Administration Services: Consultant shall provide construction administration services for the Project, as required by the Contract Documents and as set forth in Task 4 of Schedule "A" hereto (entitled "Construction Administration Services"). 2.5.5 Additional Services: If required (and so approved) by the City, Consultant shall provide Additional Services, as set forth in Task 5 of Schedule"A" hereto. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant(or of any of its officers, employees, sub-consultants, agents, and/or servants), for the accuracy and competency of its/their designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents, nor shall such approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in designs, working drawings, plans, technical specifications, or other technical documents; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City pursuant to this Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the parties (subject to approval of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Commission) (the Effective Date), and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or until the work and/or services under the Notices to Proceed in force at the end of the stated period of time have been completed and the Services accepted,whichever may be later. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule, attached to as Schedule "E" hereto. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Project Schedule, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator may require), the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Coordinator's approval(if granted)shall be in writing. 2.7.4 Nothing in this Section 2.7 shall prevent the City from exercising its rights to terminate the Agreement, as provided elsewhere herein. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Coordinator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all work required under the Agreement (including the work performed by sub-consultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the work utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of the work in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements, as set forth in the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work. In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re- performance of any non-conforming construction services resulting from such deficient Consultant services for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, and for the period of design liability required by applicable law. The Project Coordinator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the work required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any sub-consultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its sub- consultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its sub-consultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any sub-consultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of work by sub-consultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the sub- consultant's work. 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective services and any resulting deficient, defective construction services re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.9.2 Consultant Performance Evaluation: The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the work rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.10 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any work performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project Schedule. 2.11 [Intentionally Omitted] 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after issuance of the first Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be the Project Coordinator). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e. the Project Coordinator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or his designee (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any sub- consultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or his designee (who shall be the Project Coordinator), unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require its employees and sub-consultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the Project. If, during the course of performing of the Services, Consultant determines that work should be performed to complete the Project which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Coordinator's written consent before proceeding with such work. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator, said work shall be deemed to be within the original Scope of Services, and deemed included as a Basic Service (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Coordinator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Coordinator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 The City's participation in the design and construction of the Project shall in no way be deemed to relieve the Consultant of its professional duties and responsibilities under the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS: All services provided by sub-consultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the sub- consultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the sub-consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Coordinator, in writing,who shall be the City's authorized representative to coordinate, direct, and review all matters related to this Agreement and the Project during the design and construction of same (except unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or the Contract Documents). The Project Coordinator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. However, the Project Coordinator is not authorized to issue any verbal or written orders or instructions to Consultant that would have the affect (or be interpreted as having the effect) of modifying or changing, (in any way)the following: a) the Scope of Services; b) the time within which Consultant is obligated to commence and complete the Services; or c) the amount of compensation the City is obligated or committed to pay Consultant. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.4 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its sub-consultants or vendors). 3.5 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Coordinator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.6 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. No City administrative (proprietary) approvals and/or decisions required under this Agreement shall be unreasonably conditioned, withheld, or delayed; provided, however, that the City shall at all times have the right to approve or reject any such requests for any reasonable basis. 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.7.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.7.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant, the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator. In such cases,the Commission's decision shall be final and binding upon all parties. 3.7.4 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.8 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.8.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any sub-consultants(and any replacements). 3.8.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.8.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.8.4 [Intentionally Omitted] 3.8.5 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.8.6 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.8.7 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City has established the Construction Cost Budget for the Project, as set forth in Schedule"D", attached hereto. 4.2 Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City all estimates of Construction Cost prepared by Consultant. 4.3 Consultant shall warrant and represent to the City that its review and evaluation of the Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and any other cost estimates prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant for the Project, represent Consultant's best judgment as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry; provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 The Construction Cost Budget (as established in Schedule "D" hereto) shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure)which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and reasonable discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.5 If the lowest and best base bid exceeds the Construction Cost Budget by more than five percent (5%), the City Commission may, at its sole option and discretion, elect any of the following options: (1)approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many Deductive Alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget; or (5) work with the Consultant to reduce the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Construction Cost Budget. In the event the City elects to reduce the Project Scope, the Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), and provide re-bidding services, as many times as reasonably requested by the City, at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within five percent(5%)of the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Coordinator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Coordinator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable ' through time sheets(and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement(excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.5 hereof,which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified in Schedule "B" hereto, belongs to, and shall be controlled by, the City. Any money not directed to be used by City for Reimbursable Expenses shall remain with the City (i.e. unused portions will not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses in excess of $500 must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Coordinator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Coordinator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Coordinator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: 6.2.1 Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its sub-consultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its sub-consultants). 6.2.2 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. 6.2.3 Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services shall be XXXXXXXX, with a Reimbursable Expenses allowance of X)UUCXXXX. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never i exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in Schedule "B" hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the fees included in the Hourly Billing Rate Schedule in Schedule "C" hereto, to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI for the Miami urban area, provided that in no event shall any the annual increase exceed three percent (3%). 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Coordinator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Coordinator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7 .2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices")), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its sub-consultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Coordinator within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a . license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. g) g) 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. g) g) 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. g) g) 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. g) 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all sub-consultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Coordinator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents(referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Coordinator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents(for delivery to the Project Coordinator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: (a) Professional Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), per occurrence, with a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence, $450,000 aggregate. Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy. (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage coverage, for each occurrence, which shall include products, completed operations, and contractual liability coverage. The City of Miami Beach, Florida must be named as an additional insured on this policy. (c) Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability coverage within the statutory limits required under Florida law. 11.2 The Consultant must give the Project Coordinator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated B+:VI or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the City's Capital Improvement Projects Director (the Director). The Director's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Director, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Director and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's"not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s)actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: X With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: XXXXX XXXX)UUUCXXX)UU(X XXXX)UUXXXXXX)UC Attn: )0XXX)0(XXXX All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act(Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Federal, State, Miami-Dade County, and City laws, ordinances, and codes which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and sub-consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its sub-consultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its sub-consultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 WARRANTY: The Consultant warrants that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the quality expected of and usually provided by the profession in the State of Florida applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY: Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement, the City is not precluded from retaining or utilizing any other architect, engineer, design professional or other consultant to perform any incidental Basic Services, Additional Services, or other professional services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other architect, engineer, design professional, or other consultant to perform any such incidental Services. g) 16.9 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by sub-consultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 9) 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.11 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, sub-consultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: g) 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. g) 16.12.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant • rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.12.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.13 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. F:\atto\AGUR1AGREEMENT FORMSIA&E AGREEMENTS\A&E Agreement-NEW BOILER PLATE(Clean Version 8-2-10).doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR • CONSULTANT: XXXX Attest Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name { r • -• ••- r:,, f. . .. . - • t. 1 -. .^. tf . r �. , r •e ,; SCHEDULE A •fir , • .... + r� • 1 _ . . 'SCOPE OF SERVICES ' - 1 -_ ' - . •• t "( 1. ., • l \ . • • V y. • . _ - • • e �' • • • y SCHEDULE B • CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $ 0.00 Design Services* $X)UCX)UU(X Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration** $)000000(X Reimbursable Allowance*** $)00000 00( Historic Preservation Board/Design Review Board (if required) $ 0.00. Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as -. identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Ad ministration will be paid on a monthly basis upon`commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $X)0(XXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the.Project. = Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance,'by the Project Coordinator. Unused portions will not paid to the Consultant. • tl. F ::SCHEDULE:.0 -.•.1-: ':'.•-•'-'. • r • HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE` . . • *I s u t ti i F i I - ,1?,.-12:..,,:, tf• '��,. T i f' i • x • t , :., -1, - r. J A SCHEDULE'D Y al - r i COSTRUCTION COST BUDGET J 1y > t -•,, a a f? " mi l,ice .)t. - .- . 1• -V '-T.)`t� -• • • • , ,: � - .-• ! - I - - - A 'bra ` f; _ is _ ,`• - ,_ _2 f 1-_- Of_ • I. t 4 - ! • • SCHEDULE E ., _ PROJECT SCHEDULE • • • • • • it • ii - • • • . _ "f - it .. i - • • I • • • 'SCHEDULE F [i ' .-• -. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT •' ` FYI f / is F ' j rp,. a ! =, ', �t .q.. 1, ... ; Y - , ly_ .. r e _ i . by�. - . SCHEDULE G r, '.'4.-•=r;.; t j� �, .•INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS ' 1 t ;,t . If _. s - I aid } 1 •fir J' ' • - ..!; ., . i ♦ - .1.x:5 1 .i•- ? - ' - � 'Z• �i - _ .'� a 'l,i .- s • .. `.S - •I' ' ! - Y '_ - r s• }. 1 \ 1 1 1i , f - SCHEDULE H ' .- - _ • _ - ' =:BEST VALUE AMENDMENT - • The Consultant agrees to abide`by all the required documentation of-`the City's Performance Information `~ Procurement System and submit the weekly,reports.. - - - a I- _ ] i r 1 r II J _ is — , A w r. :: S h Lr S - n - � T: - .. - •F --. FMS- 1 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 35 I' / 'I, fr/" �.r4it'rr it ..." ' .--. .,/,---- • , //14/ '.4 • A 1111111C te ,,„„ ,, ,. , ,,,,,,,, ,i* ,f f !Z!i r. . ■ -0.1 .. i a : t A � / , ti;'.S s,.1' S iti• •_ __,,,,14 ,4 _. , • , .,,,v,, ,,kw ti ti ., It .: . ., . . _.,..i.........„.„6::e ` �t - r- �w '�• * 1•:•„{_ 3T_a• 'l� ..rte' • '' *11414 14ri.:*'1 r;C'; '4 t":! 413k .- ' ' 11101"4110 ' ,.. :- .-,diktiele#: -'. .., '.4-•. . tp ' *---',-, - 741,"'-, t , , , -:,.., ".,.e. t: . ,,,,,_......i. . . . .,.- 1* „rat ....Alto �• ` •Y • -el yyI ♦ _� RIRV 1= 'i. ... tip i µ o 1.. eG.,_ a ti i ;_�: " ►�- tr : . .. A il r \ ' - N. - ; , Ai-r. ., 3.-1'. '" .-. ..6 24'. , , ' .•`..VI':ti.'4-. ' ,:,:'. ' IF' i ..., , ..=„4,jetrk.l. * 1.....-t if sk * ....,'''' . _.., ., ■ r \ \1 7 - ' \.. )* , i, . AR, "J'c:, •i•, / ,'/ , ,• ei, * - .•j*i 1� , _ -y4...,�•Y," 1 , 1,'., 1'~..' - S --- • hS i i J` 1+•� ce - _ ,. , " iiC "/e: Y r �•,,a ; y & 'r . 1.11 -;;,t,ati 1 '. , . > ,, ... _ w ,... ...4",,,,:e.. y : . y '4 p ''• I KS ‹.:..43::4!k' r'y , /I . ♦,'S' 'p N& b �(A.+ vd « , wx Jrn , ' 44 Z o *� t tn�f J�� �b, 4 �'• . ,, q •. -•'asp h1 S' +4:4 ' i �- r *1, v_ f, 3,. -4,4•„4-••" { !.e: 'g.: { f.� . .Y .* ( } .► . . P... .- . ', ' .I: k. • . :. rg. ►.:sta 4• .r T � • 4�., I, +"^ +4 a„i.' ", ✓ ,- �l> `t� i " . S: � }��� +�, .sv ' i� � .f s -a � u. N , ' � "� hy� .� ♦` , • 't, 4 `^� r . ,, •Z.I.!. e,�; , A ' . - t ra - �fw. � f` ` 11 %w rte + :' .•f Y r. i lt . > 3/ s n� ' 1 4 ✓ . A , Y i PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND E �� IN �E :Ea IN �ER ' :I �.., E S RFQ 2014-346-YG GROUP A-ARCHITECTURAL December 2014 Landscape .. /1 • . , •j mo :-- ':. .: '_op__. ,4, i,. . , _i C co ti; l: <� ..-- --f t. Z l C D r CO CD D cD t it i. 4� 3 CD K •"•:'''\ '" 3 rt C Cover Letter & .__.._ .._....., . . _ 1 Minimum Qualifications �: ,„ , ' � � .N. Requirements 1, irei44!)._, ik ....., ,. --) . -!\.... .„....(..;.4.4.:.... . ,,..7 ..--, ..., , ......., i i ....,_. .. _, ;-.-„:4„.., ,. . E k ' e . r• 01 00°/: i'....7":, ' ' l' • 4 4 .,fir, ': , , _.,a,.. ,-, ,, _ 01 : . - - , - - . iiciltli ..,„*.,-- -,,„ f.t. 4. K 4. ♦,ice ..t°,,, `� . :' • i Y y '. •• ` 4‘14. .p....,.. .,,..‘ . ... 114.. .," . , :. , 4.f.e..... , , ..... ',,,,,sii .--:,' .:111*-,,,..-- . .......,_ . , ,...,. „,„, , .41, . ..4 I‘,.,4,, .400 : WI....gm !+► 'ay ,•. it -- ,,* l ..400=., v qoP 4,'1 rtb ,,r t . . ...,-- ., . , , . , ., „ ... .... ._.,.. . .,... . . . . - „,,,,„,.. 11."... 4..... • -,-,. R r• 0, t fit:: N air lik. ' •,1%. ,N ,.. • -4,• a+^ a} + . a%Ili . j • " .r.. , ' ,-:* ', , 1.1:W.' .... 0.,.. '',. *, ' ,A,Abk ' . ...-k.k 4- ..,,,_ r-.0 . w ; - , ,k �i tom. 1 • t .% d a i :t �-- • vii_:; 3 t. ,, C ' . .i ' � a s 41tH om , . I �' •� � ,` ■ ��:kI b,a I I f•"r ` fir( -i , '� • , + N.. ., ,-4.44,' - 1,. . , ,.. ,..*,: ! v., ,' .1... ,.1.., .1,, .10 , . ,, ..4..., . i„.., ,, �� r: a 1 if4 ditto a r°T v` . • '-; . 4. '' e k-41ii..'• Pft—lEs.. . Cover Page & Table of Contents 4 y ,� t, fa '. 'IA'-{q r"'' '-''''''1"- w :r :to :'i A,' 1 - i�. .� t - ,e.� ?� �,... , __ _A 7 * ^ rt t • w _ �"�, a "} y r' � _.r •!r• -'. ... ,44474-!'.14 -''''''' ' ^- ' - •- '.',. __ r, s L ..• ., 4.r �. • v � /° r -- //t - f •t, 4Lr r , - ens {. J jj _ x'44» �~ "_ .• •. r i Cover Letter�r Minimum Qualifications : ' („ , 11 Cover Page and Table of Contents 1 • - i - 'le•,„,iolopr 407.%''--- 1.2 Response Certification,Questionnaire and , .'1 ,rte ,,0,0'1,r."1'-' Requirements Affidavit 5 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 24 /, r - 02 Experience&(16,..,4,,...„,.,;,,,,, � '' A 90/ 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm&2.2 i ,° Qualifications of Proposer Team 37 4/ , . , r r , ` � "7. .,,,,�''...." - 2.3 Financial Capacity 61 ,r , ° � > '" �` -- Approach&Methodology ,r Exceptions to RFQ A=COM AECOM 305 444 4691 tel 800 Douglas Entrance 305 447 3580 fax North Tower,2nd Floor Coral Gables,FL 33134 www.aecom.com December 2,2014 Mr.Yusbel Gonzalez,CPPB City of Miami Beach Department of Procurement Management 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 • Re: RFQ 2014-346-YG,Professional Architectural and Engineering Services GROUP A-Architecture,Landscape Dear City of Miami Beach Selection Committee: AECOM is pleased to submit our qualifications and approach for providing Landscape Architectural Support Services to City of Miami Beach.We have thoroughly enjoyed working with the City's staff performing park planning and design services including the recently completed Altos Del Mar Park and the Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape Improvement project.We are impressed with the City's work to prepare,provide,and implement high quality public spaces that balance recreation access and natural resource protection.We are excited about the opportunity to continue this collaboration. Our unique qualifications include: • Extensive Park Planning Experience—We have extensive experience in park planning,including site and context analysis,programming,public participation,needs assessments and system plans,natural resource evaluation and management planning,design guideline preparation,and master plan and construction plan preparation. • Proven Management Team—Our team has provided on-time,on-budget high quality projects for the City, including the Altos Del Mar Park and the Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape • Improvement project. • Nationally Known Team—AECOM is a national leader in parks and recreation planning and has worked on parks plans in more than 75 communities around the U.S. • Knowledge of Miami Beach—We have conducted work in Miami Beach for several years and are very familiar with the park system,natural resources,and recreational opportunities. • Multi-Disciplinary Team—Our team of park planners,landscape architects,civil engineers and arborists work seamlessly to provide the services necessary to assess,plan,and design high quality park spaces. • Proven Methodology—We have a tested methodology and process for successfully completing park planning assignments,including public involvement and facilitation. We believe the AECOM Team is uniquely qualified to provide Landscape Architectural Support Services to the City of Miami Beach.The following submittal further defines our qualifications,general approach,and extensive experience for recreation planning and design in the City of Miami Beach and throughout Florida.We appreciate your consideration of AECOM for this very important assignment and look forward to discussing our ideas with you. • Sincerely, '// 1Q1k111644°6 Randy Mfejeur, MS, LEED AP Greg Ault Authorized Signatory Principal-in-Charge AECOM Technical Services, Inc. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. randy.mejeur @aecom.com greg.ault @aecom.com AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?-ofessio la.Arc^ ec*,J a s ^•gee gSe-vicas 3 cr'•�' S• ` :1 . - .. tt` T' 1 Ott • ., ti; . ,l � .i S I S t yt. r r iS I to . 1. * •''� - iJ 6 �r _ T - L y •3• • _ r � - _ M1M1 - y _- 4 •` . it Y V ` _ :.:- • •-y• • r 1 t 1 r , ''t •1. -• 1 2 Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit Solcilation No: Solicitaicn Title: • RFQ 2014-346-YG - PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN"AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Procurement Conta:L I Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000,Ext.6230 I yusbelgonzalez @miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME:AECOM Technical Services. Inc. No of.Yearsirn?usiness:; 44 No of Years in,3usiress_Locally:,88, No af:Emptoyetis:•95,000•.worldwide OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE.LAST 10 YEARS: Earth Tech, Inc:(08/03/1995-11/09/2008) FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 1999 Avenue of the Stars,Suite 2600 CITY: Los Angeles STATE: I ZIP CODE: California I 90067 TELEPHONE NO.:._ (213)593-8100 TOLL FREE NO.: Not Applicable FAX NO.: (213)593-8187 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS:. 800 Douglas Entrance, North Tower,2nd Floor CITY: Coral Gables STATTE: ZIP CODE:. Florida 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR.THIS.ENGAGEMENT: Randy Meieur,MS,LEED AP ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (407)4843-6552 ACCOUNT REP TCLL FREE NO.: Not Applicable - ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: randy:mejuernaecom.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATIONAO.: 95-2661922 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited To:any firm or principal information,applicable Iicensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements: RFQ 201.4-346-YG Appendix A—Page 1 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 5 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES ✓ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates.AECOM does not have any family members who are employees of . the City of Miami Beach. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director,agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an public sector agency? YES I1 NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). Please see attached AECOM's Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation statement. 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions,. as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. AECOM does not have a financial interest with the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposalresponse; or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying.and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit:firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/; Please see attached AECOM's Code of Business Ethics. 6. •-•• ■- •- - - - -• ''= - - `' - _ - • - • --- - _ __ - - - ••_ - - - e -:.• -••-• • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 2 6 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits'to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ✓ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? ✓ YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the `other" section any additional benefits not already specified.Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health ✓ ✓ Sick Leave ✓ Family Medical Leave ✓ ✓ Bereavement Leave ✓ ✓ If Proposer.cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 3 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitectu•al aid Engineering Se'vices 7 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm R- -ipt R-'-i.t Receipt Addendum 1 i DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to,the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may,withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting.Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made..Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this.Disclosure and Disclaimer,is.totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same:may be modified,and the applicable. definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties,,and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is govemed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all,Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and 'declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry'or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to.the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the'City. • In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 5 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 9 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following'information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,,all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the. solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted;.Proposer has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Randy Mejeur, MS, LEED AP Principal Signature of P.•.;er's Authony Represen.l._: Date: _ / / November 24, 2014 State of FLORIDA. ). On this2-4 day of AN r;201i personally appeared before meor PAL€Mr who County of ) stated that(s)he is the Pnn _k of Psi M ,a corporation, and that the,instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me:, No ary Public for the tate of Florida N. Notary Public state of Florida My Commission Expires: C1,k 120 t1 t My Co mis Garcia �e My Commission FF 034273 Nrotor Expires 09116/2017 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix.A—Page 6 10 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 1 .2.3 Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation AECOM Technical Services,Inc.("ATS")has not within Thereafter,in February 2014,a company outside the the three-year period preceding this certification had control of ATS,but in which ATS's ultimate parent AECOM one or more public transactions(Federal,state or local) Technology Corporation holds an interest(AECOM Sunset terminated for cause or default except as follows: Olive,LLC)purchased a 50%interest in a project known as Sunset Time,which is located in the Sunset Specific plan 1)in November of 2012,AECOM received a notice from area.ATS provided the City with information showing that the City of Sarasota, Florida,notifying AECOM that it has although two entities(ATS and AECOM Sunset Olive, LLC) terminated its contract with AECOM for the design of a have partial overlapping ownership,their management sewer lift station for default. AECOM disagrees with the structures and reporting relationships are wholly separate. termination.The City of Sarasota ultimately filed suit. Nonetheless,on June 19,2014,ATS received notice from AECOM is vigorously defending the City's claims and the the City that it was terminating the contracts for cause, matter remains pending;and but would be willing to agree to a mutual termination if ATS would take certain actions.On August 27,2014,the 2) In August 2013 and December 2013,AECOM Technical City and ATS mutually agreed that the terminations of the Services, Inc.(ATS)entered into contracts with the Sunset Specific Plan Contract and 8228 Contract are for the City of West Hollywood,California(City)to update the convenience of the City. Sunset Specific Plan relative to billboards and tall walls. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ; Professional A'cnitectu•al and Engineering Services 11 1 .2.5 Code of Business Ethics AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy November 2012 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Policy 3 Responsibility • 3 Specific Guidelines of the FCPA 4 Record Keeping and Accounting 4 Illegal Payments 5 Permissible Payments 5 Dealings with Agents/Partners 6 Periodic Audits 7 Disciplinary Procedures or Penalties 7 Definitions 8 Attachment A(Agent Due Diligence) 9 Attachment B (Red Flags) 11 Executive Summary This policy was created to establish accountability and provide guidance for employees of AECOM and its subsidiaries to ensure ethical business conduct through compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, including without limitation, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA); the United Kingdom Bribery Act (2010) (UKBA); the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anti-bribery convention; the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance promulgated under Hong Kong's Independent Commission Against Corruption; the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act in Canada; and the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) in Australia. The foregoing laws are collectively("Applicable Laws"). The purpose of this policy is not to describe all of the specific requirements or provisions of the Applicable Laws; rather the purpose is to promulgate AECOM standards to comply with Applicable Laws and to provide tools to detect and prevent suspected violations of Applicable Laws. Because most Applicable Laws focus on interactions with government officials, this policy does as well. Please refer to AECOM's Code of Conduct with respect to guidance in dealing with officials at private sector clients and more generally for guidance on AECOM's core principles and conduct expectations. This policy applies to AECOM and its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees, Agents and other persons performing similar functions worldwide. The Applicable Laws generally do not contain any "materiality" standard and is not limited to cash transactions; any violation, regardless of the amount involved, is considered equally serious. Please see the definitions section after this policy for the meanings of terms not defined within this policy. Policy AECOM will only use lawful and ethical business practices while conducting business activities. Any means to influence contract awards or to gain other business advantage by illegal payments, bribes, kickbacks or other questionable inducements will not be tolerated. Please refer to AECOM Code of Conduct for our policy for reporting violations of Applicable Laws and Finance and Accounting Policy 7070 regarding requirements for Reporting of Thefts/Fraud/Misappropriations. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 2 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 13 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM AECOM may not make, or offer to make, payments of money or anything else of value, directly or indirectly, to any Government Official (a) to influence any act or decision of such official in his official capacity; (b)to induce such official to do or omit to do any act in violation of his lawful duty; (c) to induce such official to use his influence with a government; and/or (d) to secure any improper advantage, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or obtaining other business advantage. AECOM will not tolerate conscious disregard or willful blindness to circumstances suggesting that such an act will be carried out by a third party, such as an Agent. AECOM will (1) make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and financial condition, including dispositions of assets, of the company, and (2) devise and maintain a system of adequate internal accounting controls. Responsibility AECOM Chief Financial Officer(CFO) 1. Maintain accurate financial data and implement controls to ensure AECOM complies with the books and records provision of Applicable Laws. 2. Collect and maintain the quarterly acknowledgement of compliance with Applicable Laws by all applicable Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders and applicable Business Line and Geography Chief Executives which will be incorporated as part of regular quarterly certifications in connection with Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings. 3. Working with the Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer (CECO), define F&A personnel required to complete mandatory anti-corruption training. Enterprise Leadership Council (ELC), Business Line and Geography Chief Executives and Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders 1.. Although the AECOM CFO has a key leadership responsibility for compliance with this policy, the ELC, Business Line and Geography Chief Executives, and Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders-have the primary responsibility for ensuring compliance with this policy for their respective areas of responsibilities, including ensuring adequate communication to, and understanding by, all staff; periodically communicating with management to gauge awareness of any violations of this policy; reporting any such violations immediately; and otherwise being alert to ensuring compliance with this policy. General Counsel (GC), Assistant General Counsel for Compliance and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer(CECO) 1. Follow-up and/or investigate, or cause to be investigated, allegations of potential non- compliance with Applicable Laws. 2. Review recent developments and changes to Applicable Laws, and communicate any changes to AECOM employees, subsidiaries and Agents. 3. Develop and provide periodic training on requirements of Applicable Laws. 4. Review submissions of proposed arrangements for legality as well as approval under AECOM policies, including the Delegations of Authority. 5. Collect and maintain the quarterly acknowledgement of compliance with Applicable Laws by appropriate members of the Law Department which will be incorporated as part of regular quarterly certifications in connection with Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings. 6. Inform, as appropriate, the Audit Committee and Nominating &Governance Committee of possible violations of Applicable Laws or legal issues brought to the attention of the GC. 7. Update the Audit Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee as necessary regarding AECOM's compliance issues and areas of focus for the coming year. VP of Internal Audit 1. Conduct assessments and/or audits to ensure that financial and operational controls are effectively designed by the AECOM CFO and are working appropriately. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 3 November 2012 14 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I ProfessionaL Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM 2. Follow-up and/or investigate allegations of potential non-compliance with Applicable Laws, under the direction of the GC. 3. Working with the AECOM CFO, GC, Global Controller and CECO, refine and modify this policy to reflect best practices and"lessons learned". Key Provisions of Applicable Laws Record Keeping and Accounting Applicable Laws prohibit the falsification of books and records and set forth certain accounting requirements. Generally,AECOM and its subsidiaries are required to: 1. Maintain books and records in reasonable detail and that accurately and fairly reflect transactions and disposition of assets. To this end, all transactions.must be accurately recorded in accordance with AECOM policies and any additional enhanced controls or procedures as determined to be appropriate by the AECOM CFO and CECO, or their respective designates, for a specific location'. AECOM and its subsidiaries are prohibited from maintaining undisclosed or unrecorded funds or assets established for any purpose. Examples of an undisclosed or unrecorded fund or asset include, but are not limited to: • Unrecorded petty cash; • Real or personal property held by a third party; • Bank accounts containing corporate funds but held in the names of individuals; • Bank accounts in the name of the company but only disclosed and accessible to a limited number of individuals; • Records that disguise any aspect of the transaction (for example, entering a payment to"Y"when payment was made to"Z"); and • Any indirect payment, as Applicable Laws prohibit making an indirect corrupt payment "knowing" that the payment, or portion of the payment, will be directly or indirectly made or offered to a "foreign official (for example, entering a $100,000 payment to Agent "X" when in reality there was an understanding that agent "X" would be paying $20,000 of that amount to a foreign official). "Knowing" includes conscious disregard or deliberate ignorance. 2. Devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: • All transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization. • Transactions are recorded as necessary to allow the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and to maintain accountability for assets. • Access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's authorization. • The recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. 3. Report any (a) requests for payments or other consideration that would violate this policy or (b) transactions, whether in the past or current, that appear to violate this policy or otherwise appear suspicious in nature as stated in the AECOM Code of Conduct, "How Do I Raise Concerns"section. • Enhanced controls include but are not limited to procedures to prevent unauthorized use of funds(such as limits on number of bank and petty cash accounts,additional controls around petty cash and checking signing capabilities),enhanced controls regarding vendor approval process,additional processing and monitoring controls for high risk transactions or additional staffing for stringent segregation of duties. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 4 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 15 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy A ECOM Illegal Payments Applicable Laws generally prohibit individuals or businesses from authorizing, offering or paying anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any Government Official for the purpose of influencing or causing another person to influence any act or decision of a Government Official or government to obtain or retain business or to gain a business advantage. This does not require that a corrupt act succeed in its 'purpose. The mere offer of a corrupt payment can violate Applicable Laws. • AECOM employees, representatives and Agents are prohibited from engaging in the following activities, in each case with the purpose of influencing or causing another person to influence any act or decision of a Government Official or foreign government to obtain or retaining business or to gain a business advantage: • Bribes - Giving or offering to give any money, gift or anything of value to any Government Official. • Political or Charitable Contributions - Making contributions to political parties or Government Officials or charities designated by such officials. • Third-Party Payments - Giving or offering to give money, gifts or anything of value to a third party when there is knowledge that it will then be given or offered to a Government Official. "Knowledge" includes conscious disregard for the truth or deliberate ignorance. • Facilitating Payments—Giving or offering money to a government official to induce the official to perform their lawful duties. Examples include obtaining visas, exit stamps for passports, permits, tax refunds or other actions that the official is obligated to perform. The AECOM DOA prohibits such payments except to prevent imminent threat of physical harm or jeopardy. Any such payments must be reported to the Legal Department within • five days of occurrence to avoid violating securities regulations. Permissible Payments There are a few types of payments that could be considered permissible. These include: 1. Payment considered legal under the written laws of the Government Official's country. It should be noted that very few countries have such laws and this would occur only rarely, if at all. Prior Legal Department review and approval are necessary for any such payments. 2. Payment for reasonable and bona fide expenditures incurred by or on behalf of a recipient and directly related to: • Promotion or demonstration of goods and services; or • Performance of the contract with a foreign government or an agency. • As these exceptions are strictly and narrowly focused, review and comply with the International Marketing Expenditures: Guidance and Request Form on the E&C site to obtain approval for such payments. Dealings with Agents/Partners AECOM must exercise caution in dealing with Agents or local partners. The primary risk of a violation of Applicable Laws remains in the activities of an Agent steeped in another culture, particularly in a country where illicit payments may be prevalent and payments or other activities in violation of Applicable Laws are often carried out through Agents. To minimize AECOM's exposure to violations of Applicable Laws when dealing with Agents, the following practices must be followed: Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 5 November 2012 16 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH j Professional Arc'nitectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM • A thorough due diligence must be completed and documented under the direction of the Geography General Counsel [or other in house counsel] or the CECO before engaging an Agent/partner to carry out any actions on behalf of AECOM (see Attachment A for due diligence considerations). Particular attention should be paid to any"red flags" relating to such proposed Agency Agreement (see Attachment B). Refer to Due Diligence on the E&C site for further guidance. • All Agent agreements are required to be in writing and approved by the HUB prior to the engagement of such Agent, as required under our AECOM Delegations of Authority Section 1.10(c). • Unless written approval is obtained from AECOM's Office of the General Counsel, the Template International Consultant Agreement specified by the Office of the General Counsel must be used. Refer to Due Diligence on the E&C site for further guidance. Nonnegotiable provisions include: - An acknowledgment by the Agent or partner of familiarity with the requirements of the Applicable Laws pertaining to such Agent's activities; - Covenant of future compliance with Applicable Laws; - Representations that no person affiliated with the Agent or partner is a Government Official who is in a position to influence decisions regarding the contemplated activities, and agreement to notify AECOM if any such person assumes such a position; - All payments to the Agent or partner must be for services legitimately rendered within the scope of their agreement; - Agreement that, with reasonable notice, AECOM may audit or cause to be audited the expenses and invoices of the Agent or partner; and The right to terminate the agreement upon any violation of its terms and conditions. • • No cash payments to and from Agents/partners should be allowed. • The Agent/partner should not be allowed to employ a "sub-agent", "sub-consultant", or "sub-contractor" without the prior written approval of AECOM. In addition, AECOM must review/approve of Agents/partners who are also providing subcontract services. Periodic Audits Periodic audits will be conducted by the Vice President of Internal Audit that may include, but not be limited to the following: • Whether the books and financial records are accurate and complete and in accordance with Applicable Laws; • Evaluating the terms, conditions, and amounts of commissions paid to foreign Agents and foreign sales representatives; • Assessing the reasonableness of commissions in light of the nature and extent of the services provided and when compared to other commissions paid for similar services in that country; • To assess whether Agents account precisely for any reimbursable expenses and the services they provide (including, where appropriate, the provision of receipts or invoices); • Investigating transfers or payments of large amounts of cash to Agents; • Performing payroll audits; • Ensuring that foreign Agents and sales representatives are operating under written contracts, and such Agents or representatives are not government officials; and • Assessing Agent contracts to ensure the contracts have not been inappropriately modified or changed in a manner that could lead to a violation of Applicable Laws. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 6 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH j Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 17 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM All AECOM employees and Agents should be prepared to cooperate fully with auditors. Disciplinary Procedures or Penalties Failure to adhere to the company's policies regarding Applicable Law matters may result in disciplinary measures against those employees. The severity of the disciplinary measures will vary depending on the degree of non-compliance. Discipline can range from receiving a warning or being required to attend additional training on Applicable Law compliance to termination of employment. Definitions Agents — Any sales, marketing or other agents, sponsors, advocates, representatives, marketing consultants, lobbyists, intermediaries, and other persons performing similar functions. Bribe — Making or offering of a payment or a gift of money or anything of value, if the payment or gift is to influence or cause another person to influence any act or decision to influence any act or decision of a Government Official to obtain or retain business or to gain a business advantage. Government Official — Any (A) officer or other employee of, or other person acting in an official capacity, whether paid or unpaid, on behalf of, any Government, including legislators, politicians, candidates for political office, and officials of political parties; (B) members of a royal family; and (C)such official's immediate family members, including in-laws. Government—Any(A) multi-lateral aid agency, such as the World Bank,Asian Development Bank and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, or other public international institution; (B) national, state, municipal or other local government or any agency, instrumentality, subdivision, department, commission, or other entity of or within that government; or (C) state-owned or controlled business company, association, society, enterprise or other entity(e.g., a national oil company or national airline). Payments—Money, transfer of stock, bonds or any other property, the payment of expenses, the providing of services of any type, the assumption or forgiveness of any indebtedness, or any other transfer of goods, services, or intangibles that accrues to the benefit of the ultimate recipient or promotes his or her interest. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 7 November 20/2 18 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Attachment A Agent Due Diligence Considerations Business Check It is essential that AECOM undertake and document appropriate "due diligence" with specific attention to potential "red flags" before pursuing transactions or other business opportunities. If AECOM is considering doing business with an Agent or business partner, it should thoroughly check the business reputation and past conduct of such person or entity, and meticulously document all inquiries. Each due diligence contact or business check should result in a written report or file memorandum. "Agent" has the meaning set out in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy. The following are some of the steps AECOM should take in conducting a background check but refer to Due Diligence at the E&C site for more information: • Request the prospective Agent or party to provide a list of references, a professional resume, and a complete employment history; • Contact the party's references and former employers; • Contact the commercial attaché at the U.S. embassy or other appropriate country embassies or representatives of multilateral institutions in the country where the Agent or partner will be working and request all available information about the Agent or Partner; • Contact the commercial representative of the embassy of the foreign country in the US and request all available information about the Agent or Partner; • Utilize the services of an outside agency or consultancy to perform due diligence on the proposed Agent; • Utilize resources such as Dun & Bradstreet and the International Company Profile Program to obtain background reports on companies; and • Investigate the country's reputation for bribery, using databases such as Transparency International.2 Visit the E&C site to review the latest Transparency International Corruption Index standings. Contract AECOM should insist on using the Template International Consultant Agreement when contracting with an international agent/consultant and the "Compliance with Laws" section in that Template Agreement in every contract or other business agreement. The main purpose of such provisions is to inform Agents or business partners of the importance of the Applicable Laws, and to provide evidence of intent to comply with the Applicable Laws. Audit In certain circumstances, AECOM should consider conducting internal audits on the Agent's compliance with its agreement, including compliance with Applicable Laws. Information on Transparency International can be found at http://www.transparency.org. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 8 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 19 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Local Counsel In certain circumstances, AECOM should consider obtaining or requiring the Agent or business partner to obtain an opinion letter from mutually agreed upon local counsel as to the legality of the proposed activities and transactions under the laws of the countries involved. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 9 November 2012 20 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Architectural and E ngineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy A.COM Attachment B Red Flags: Guidelines for Identifying Suspicious Business Transactions Introduction "Red Flags" are circumstances that may suggest a reason to know of an actual or proposed illegal payment by an AECOM employee or third party acting on behalf of the company, thus creating risk under Applicable Laws for AECOM and potential personal liability for its officers and employees. The presence of a red flag does not automatically disqualify a proposed transaction, but requires greater scrutiny and safeguards against a possible violation. In-house Counsel and the CECO should be notified and consulted as soon as possible if such circumstances arise. See the Anti-Corruption Checklist on the E&C site in addition to the below guidance. Agents When Agents are retained to assist AECOM in locating or facilitating international business opportunities, AECOM should perform thorough background checks of those involved, as more fully described in Attachment A. If an Agent's or business partner's sole qualification is the personal relationship with Government Officials rather than substantive expertise in the business area, this constitutes a red flag. AECOM must be especially cautious of Agents' efforts to use front companies to make payments to Government Officials [as defined in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy] and where AECOM is engaged in dealings with officials of companies in which a foreign Government has an ownership interest. These officials may be considered "Foreign Government Officials" under Applicable Laws. Requests or direction from a government or state owned client to use a particular technical or non-technical consultant also constitute a red flag. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy. Guarantees AECOM should require Agents to sign written contracts prior to performing any services on its behalf or at the first opportunity thereafter to confirm that no improper payments are being made to Government Officials. An Agent's refusal to sign such an agreement initially[and,thereafter, to periodically certify compliance as a condition to receiving payment] constitutes a red flag. Middlemen AECOM should be wary of any situation in which multiple middlemen seem to be performing the same task. Contracts with Agents require AECOM's prior written approval of any subagents. Government Relationships Agents who have previously held Government positions or who have an ongoing relationship with a Government official should be carefully examined. AECOM should not employ an Agent who is a current Government Official. Additionally, payments to dummy corporations, spouses or relatives of such officials can result in liability and severe penalties. Third Parties The payment of fees or commissions through third parties or third countries is another warning sign of possible violations of Applicable Laws or money laundering statutes. While there may be legitimate accounting and financial reasons for directing payments to a foreign bank or to an entity other than the Agent, AECOM should investigate and satisfy itself as to such payment terms and the reason for them should be documented in detail. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 1 0 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 21 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Gifts and Entertainment of Non-US Government Officials or Commercial Clients Although some Applicable Laws permit the provision of gifts, marketing trips or entertainment to Government Officials, many prohibit them and such activities can carry substantial risks. Such actions must be reasonable in amount, offered only in connection with the promotion or • demonstration of company services or capabilities or the performance of a contract with a foreign government, lawful under Applicable Laws and appropriate under the circumstances so as not to create an appearance of impropriety. Additionally the UKBA prohibits gifts to and entertainment of commercial clients if the intent is to influence them to take improper actions. Check Gifts & Entertainment on the E&C site for detailed guidance and access to regional gifts and entertainment policies. Country Certain regions of the world appear more prone to violations of Applicable Laws than others. In places where the standard costs of doing business are perceived to include bribes, pay-offs, and "gifts" to foreign officials or their agents, AECOM should take extra care to ensure compliance with Applicable Laws. Unless obtaining advance approval from AECOM General Counsel (or designee) we will not pursue business relationships in the following countries: North Korea, Iran, Cuba and the Sudan (excluding the Government of the Southern Sudan) or other entities and individuals on U.S. and international sanctions list. Sanctions Programs on the E&C webpage contains updated information on sanctioned parties and a link to the company's screening tool which must be used to ensure compliance. Opportunities for significant business, coupled with widespread corruption and unclear distinctions between the public and private sectors, have made the following regions high-risk areas: Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, China, and parts of Southeast Asia. Commissions AECOM should perform careful research on the terms, conditions, and amounts of commissions paid to Agents and its relationship to the work performed. Many of the anti-corruption cases that have been prosecuted involved exorbitant commissions or fees not justified by the Agent's work or expertise. AECOM should ensure that the commissions are both reasonable in light of the nature and extent of the services provided and when compared to other commissions paid for similar services in that country. Unreasonably high commissions may signal a higher probability that money is being diverted to pay Government Officials. Any commission rate in excess of 10% (including subcontracts and all fee arrangements) would constitute a red flag and would require due diligence and/or mitigation. However, commission rates less than 10% may not be reasonable in a particular country given the nature and extent of services provided. Situations where the amount of payment is linked to the value of the anticipated sale or contract to be awarded merit extra attention. Agents should be required to account precisely for their expenses and the services they provide. Cash Payments One of the most obvious warning signs is the transfer of cash. Cash payments raise questions under both the accounting and anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA and other Applicable Laws. AECOM's failure to investigate cash payments to Agents could result in charges of liability on a "conscious avoidance" theory. It also may trigger reporting obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering provisions. As a result, AECOM's general policy is to prohibit cash payments to Agents or other third parties. Bonuses, Reimbursements, and other Payments AECOM should closely monitor and carefully document any large payment to Agents or, as applicable, their employees. Large bonus payments, subcontract awards on a non-competitive basis or reimbursements for unusually high entertainment, advertising, or other administrative expenses may be used as a device to mask illegal payments to Government Officials. This Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 11 November 2012 22 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM • Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM warning also encompasses advance payments made before any work has begun, which may be to help ensure award of a contract or continuance of a business relationship or after the fact "award fee." AECOM should also be wary of"after-sales service fees,"which were the subject of a recent enforcement action and found to constitute kickback payments prohibited under the Applicable Laws. Payroll Fraud Much like large cash payments, the presence on AECOM's payroll of persons who are relatives or associates of Government Officials can raise serious compliance concerns, particularly if such person's qualifications or work product are not bona fide. • Secrecy AECOM should be wary of any situation in which potential Agents or partners seem reluctant either to explain fully the nature of a proposed activity or transaction, or to provide clear answers to routine commercial or technical questions. Likewise, AECOM should be wary of Agents who request unusual or excessive confidentiality or secrecy regarding a transaction. The same applies with Agents, partners or AECOM employees requesting or pressuring employees to account for transactions in an inaccurate, covert, deceptive or otherwise misleading manner. Conscious disregard of or failure to ask questions regarding questionable actions or proposals of an Agent or partner can result in personal liability for AECOM executives and responsible employees. Research AECOM personnel should keep abreast of developments outside their home country in which such personnel's operations conduct business. Publicly reported cases of bribery, pay-offs, and public corruption should prompt a careful review of AECOM's operations and compliance program in that country or.region. Competitor Violations If AECOM learns that its competitors (especially competitors not subject to the Applicable Laws) are involved in bribery, pay-offs, or other activities that may violate the Applicable Laws, AECOM should immediately conduct a careful investigation of its operations, or accelerate its usual training schedule to remind employees of AECOM's standards, expectations, and responsibilities. In a difficult competitive environment, employees may learn of a competitor's tactics and may be tempted to follow suit to avoid falling behind. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 12 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 23 ,3 Minimum Qualifications Our team, our local experience, and our approach focused on assisting the City and its staff with professional architectural and engineering services will exceed the expectations described in your RFQ. The AECOM team meets and exceeds the minimum requirements,and more importantly,provides significant advantages to Miami Beach which are critical to delivering projects under this contract.The table below,which addresses Appendix C and Section 0200 of the RFQ,illustrates our qualifications. Minimum-Requirements -Benefit to Miami Beach Tab Cl. Proposers Experience, Architects & Engineers Experience, and Firm & Staff Licensure - AECOM has assembled a team of professionals experienced in providing Landscape Architecture services.The i) Proposer must have a Tab 2 industry's and region's top talent providing global expertise minimum of five years Items 2.1 & and local knowledge are available and committed to the experience 2.2 City.The table on the next page shows all of our team members'years of relevant experience. Over 90 years working in Coral Gables,and successful ii) Proposer must delivery of Miami Beach projects,AECOM has valuable Tab 2 submit at least five lessons learned which will lead to efficient execution of Items 2.1 & relevant projects your project. Detailed project experience and references for 2.2 landscape architecture related projects are included in this Tab 2. A licensed team Miami Beach can rely on to provide iii) Firm &Staff best practices in landscape architecture,design, public Tab 1 outreach,construction documents, park planning and Item 1.3 Licensure water use/irrigation services. AECOM's corporate licenses and staff member licenses are included in Tab 1. As detailed in our Approach and Methodology section, C2. Scope of Work AECOM understands the City of Miami Beach and its desire Tab 3 Required to maintain Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis" 24 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Our Team is comprised of local and national experts who have a depth of knowledge,diverse disciplines and experience providing the requested professional services needed for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services. TEAM MEMBER YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AECOM is certified Greg Ault Role: Principal-in-Charge/Planner 32 to work in the State Gustavo Santana,MLA 11 Role: Project Manager/Planner Of Florida and also Lauren Swan,MLA 3 professionally licensed Role: Landscape Designer/Public Outreach Michael Brown,RLA 15 in the following Role: Landscape Architect/Designer/Planner Andrew Sheppard,RLA,LEED AP 14 d iSCipli neS: Role: Landscape Architect/Designer Thomas J.McMacken,Jr.,RLA Role: Landscape Architect/Construction Documents 37 State of Florida Department.of Galen Pugh,RLA,AICP 25 State Corporation No: Role: Landscape Architect/Construction Documents/Planner F95000004014 Hannah Plate 1.5 Role: Landscape Designer/Construction Documents Nicholas Kuhn,RLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: Role: Park Planner 14 . State of Florida Board.of Drew Crumpton 1 Landscape Architecture No: Role: Park Planner LC26000395 Dale Morehouse,CID,CLIA 20 Role: Water Use/Irrigation Jason Bird 15 Role: Water Use/Irrigation AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 25 State of or • a Department of State I certify from the records of this office that AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. is a California corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on August 21, 1995. The document number of this corporation is F95000004014. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on April 30, 2014, and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Sixth day of June,2014 .--01-1:1,7------ zitTOX.,,.. :,r* . '''-.-\76, \, ",9.31111,( ~ '.^ � i�I1�'�C.., �i..' 'y } '•,i{r 'r,i;:.1 Secretary of State p,ry Authentication ID:CU0954435966 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this ID,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.sunbiz.org/certauthver.html 26 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ �;;-❑• LICENSE NUMBER f',. 1 46=:....A. •' � LC26000395 -+� 4. *:+ •The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS ��o•+ Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑ - - Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1050 LOS ANGELES CA 90071 VIVA F101IDA500 ISSUED: 11/12/2013 SEC/# 11311120001163 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 0 • •'' ❑ BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ' LICENSE NUMBER LA0001193 i��:r ' The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑,Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 MCMACKEN,THOMAS J JR 120 N ORANGE AVE ORLANDO FL 32801 fair VIYA MPIA RICK SCOTT ISSUED 09/2 412 01 3 SEQ# L1309240001388 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON.SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION -BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • 0 . 'I` ❑ LICENSE NUMBER �•• . * T•,- LA6666962 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT • 4.1.11"-. Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 +:a 5' Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 BROWN.MICHAEL JASON 6676 LAKE PEMBROKE PLACE ORLANDO FL 32829 '4'01,1AR1A ISSUED: 01/13/2014 SEQ# 11401130000844 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ LICENSE NUMBER J " LA6866767 +�_r r�r .•• The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT t+; 1 ♦' Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 : A°• Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. r Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 SHEPPARD,ANDREW BRIAN 9409 WHISPERING MEADOWS LN ORLANDO FL 32825 1l'�I;li�i�l ISSUED. 11/2012013 SEO# 11311200001074 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH -ofess:c^a. a'd=-ginearingSe-vices 27 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE '~i,# �• .;_..LICENSE NUMBER LA0001522 •. •r. ` j The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ` Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 PUGH,GALEN J 3509 JENNIE JEWEL PLACE ORLANDO FL 32806 RICK SCOTT ISSUED: 09/12/2013 SEQ# L1309120001898 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ -.101- . 0 LICENSE NUMBER , f , LA6667065FF1TT+ ,ter• The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT •JJf� + ' Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑' t, a Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 KUHN,NICHOLAS DAVID 1407 GOVERNORS CT. RALEIGH NC 27604 VIVA RIIIII ISSUED: 12/23/2013 SEQii L1312230000721 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW The American Institute of Certified Planners The Professional Institute of the American Planning Association hereby qualifies Galen J. Pugh as a member with all the benefits of a Certified Planner and responsibility to the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Certified Planner i\unrher:019833 December 29.2004 PRF If)F\? EiF(i'11VE UIRF.cros 28 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH j Professjoia[A'critectj a:aid=cgiiee•iigSevices AECOM i,. . „ . . . , . . ,• . . . ..._ ..._ . . ... . ....... ... . . . . • . . .... . _. ..,.... ........_.. . • ..... ,,....• ,... .. ) : .,., ..,. ..-_ ...--.,...-..,, ,. TA, --. .-..,,, , ..:41,___ . z:. ..„,....., ,72:" ,-„,47::1,• '.,.., .../. ,..T. „.•.-1---1,,Ti:-- ..,•,_ 1r �'�J't'f ♦ f'-f ♦1 f 1 ♦'.f i a f'1: •:t:• •:• f-t ♦ t:l'f:♦:♦'f V 71 f i t i.•:♦ •■•.• • •:1 •.• f •.f•1 1 • • ♦ f l-f: c elj; THE IRRIGTION ASSOCIATION { c Certifies That On > - - September 5, 2001 ,,,.,... <:_.:_,4.,T......;;,,T__,T7.7______,___._.T.....____...,.„:„.____,_,:,___„_„.__..__.___:----,._--:i.-----:7"----',T-- -, ;.:,.....„..,,,,. „....„,,,...”.:......,,..„,,.............„... .........,,......: -...,......„- . , ,,-., -..„.,::-,.., - - - - ..,- - . .. _ , , .,.. . •,... ... . .. . . ... .. *, .. `, ' ,-ii ... i'i:Y)t -: •i'' Dale Q,'Morehouse :: x ,..„,., _ „.:,cf„ .., ...., , ., ,. . 4 f ,,, I �, . Successfully Completed All The Necessary Requirerihents `� x1 And Should Henceforth Be Recognized As A <i • ; � V i >` C TFIED COMMERCIAL s T. IRRIGATION DESIGNER , „,, i; 41•� F Chair,Certification Board `;. �:. >` 14. 'ctr,r its:f.1 r •'t ••:r..:-•..f•!• • ♦1'f*IL l:i:ltt Se 1 i'♦-.e-li t tN_r,17._„..........:. x. « -- w• 1 r ` i� Y , ^w � kn ...0. 51 r A,,, x ., ^fir .�.t.+'F� l o_ 'Y�; - - ,__... ;-,-,-;.7.:” �. 'w 4,... ..;..-t,...1,A - `- /^!' .: --- = .<1.!'-'',,,,,-.,,,i' ,.. • '' -- } . i d ', i t 't I` I I , I '. w j. ••• •.• /In at$. . • ..•. ... • t • . • • . • • . • • • ..♦ • . ." THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION . ... Certifies That On • ,. April 26, 2006 il ' . Dale Morehouse . of• r. I'auatl►dtt"N111m(101: 1102b47 • 0.- Sueresstully Co►►'Ipl tc•d All The Necessary Requirements And Should I lcucclovth 1k itrcognlzc(1 As A t i:ii›. 'CERTIFIED IR..RIGA`N'ION 1)U(,sit.iNI. R ., GOLF COURSE . wr ',,1 , i 11(fig, « 1 4. 1, rs:1 t e( (((1 1!(ii i`\� w ,11,,11.1•t• (.11 .• tilt It ,t t (.■, t t•II•'1 - .1.,, , . ., ` ' Chair,Orgill 11.1i14111/10414 • ■ i d de f AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P,ofessional Arcnitecturat and Engineering Services 29 Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS Member ISA, AFNN, FNGLA /Certified Arborist Environmental Landscape Construction / Management Natural Areas Restoration,Invasive Plant Eradication,Mitigation,Aquatic Management 28905 SW 162 Ave.Homestead,FL.33033-2200 Tel 305-245-1722 Fax 305-246-1379 mixd2reens ,bellsouth.net Michael Gnaegy/Certifications/Affiliations/Licenses Certifications—Membership -ISA-FNGLA- FDACS -AFNN - (University of Florida IFAS Extension/Miami Dade County * US Army 1970 Over Seas Tour ETS 1974 * Certified Veteran Owned Company * Mix'd Greens, Inc. operation of Business for over thirty seven years (Established 1977) * Certified: ISA Arborist(FL#0378)—International Arborist Association(#15625) *Certified: FDACS License Public Right-Of-Way Herbicide Application, Restricted Aquatics: License (CM13479) & Aerial Applicator on Staff(Department of Agriculture And Consumer Services) (Natural Areas Management Practices) * Miami Dade County Horticultural Advisory Committee 2008-2014 * Certification: Horticulture-Landscape-Maintenance from University of Florida IFAS/Miami Dade Cooperative Extension * Certified in DERM - BPM (Best Management Practice) University of Florida FDACS / Miami Dade Cooperative Extension * Certified: Federal HUB Zone Business Certification * Miami Dade County Small Business Minority Certification#15467 * Miami Dade County IFAS Horticultural Advisory Committee 2005 -2014 * FDACS Certificate of Nursery Registration USDA#47219769 * FDACS License as Bonded Dealer in Agricultural Products USDA * Member Florida Association of Native Nurseries (FANN formerly known as AFNN) * Member Florida Nursery, Growers & Landscape Association (FNGLA) * FNGLA Board Director, Dade County (Past 2006—2013) * Dade County Vendor/Contractor>25 Years * Dade County Adopt-A-Tree Grower& Transportation projects 2002 to 2009 * Dade County Landscaper Permit(DSWM Permit Section) * Wildlife & Environmental Training(FPL nuclear facility"Turkey Point") * Mix'd Greens Personnel are all OSHA trained (10 - 30 hours+) relative to services. * Over Thirty Seven Years of Experience in Landscape—Production—Environmental— Remediation/Maintenance & Horticultural Industries since (1977) Mick Gnaegy ISA FL #0378 CM #13479 Mix'd Greens, Inc. 28905 SW 162 Ave Homestead, Florida 33033-2200 Mobile: 305 345 6108 Office: 305 245 1722 Fax: 305 246 1379 Email: mixdgreens@bellsouth.net www.MixdGreens.Com AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ! Professional Architectu rat and Engineering Services 31 : 4444 ., .-- i — --:--7-3---—— 7 '' '(1:_„'. i I: N ill ' d'flairti.44 il t - ti:vi, 11 11.) ' II f,iI€,IZaOJSow 4 1 i,Giae '(--- ; = Michael J. Gnaegy ,,, ) 'il , c......, .) 1;f orarx eaae.944 �xyaleei de reyaziw elb del 4 a sirierist eerr�i Brut f ...Z arr` 1 de fraernalcevtal..9 Ids ql r icud,ie, 1 AV ) 1 de a./ixre /tamer/ ii .6,4 ao a/s ,f Yd. Krr44( drhvzel --- li ` ), I? ''' ">-S-Fplii ,,,......_ , -,-.:-- .....„\T,,,,, jsAk ) i li. FL-0378A 12/31/04 { j\ 9 . i lc',j-...„,- �, 4....74."" ,hr`s 17"`7 r --- .!^► ��'r�"'�„��>-- -"''' lrrr'�^?,,I"`^�"�:!�'1T f!—,,,� — N`✓ , (k) 0 0� (../ .0 tip;, „. t�,.? t i,1i lr_' .J ,. i 7 0 (\/ ti_r kc_7 is a• _, fi 4 F _. __ � "9�..� �k f� $ . '� ' Al .... 1,^{44 1. } Certijicate of C / , 1 This certifies that : 1 Michael G. Gnaegy \'‘ 1 , ,a` t `l has successfully completed the �` Construction Safety & Health Safety Training OSHA 30-hours t .01:(,)( -,.„„ November 14, 2011 Pi ,,`,r ��,,-j Miami, Florida A c Risk Control Consultants , . , Al...//....... O r f i 11:orrego / -,t.:-.‘ , Instructor a?gip i , R � a a . a14: 1 32 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM --��--��;�- , ♦2�--.mot,. --_�1,, —,'v --�'x' — w.---,4,,---.�.,- �� ,y,, �Y.-- ,y, - �Y �Y. _ y--�. 'a •,: 4 "dsi"� ,, A'4� r p.',. it'} p } sFx 9� n a: '', ,� .y� -..: c.-6,�' -u. a : .! ,■.t....-T,...' ,I "L..I, ".''m ��g x 9' 't ' � ':^. k ,.[ i -if 3.V ears pp :. . ` ..•1 "9 ; ..,,# ..: "' ,, ,a a\ ,rte";.1. f -y7i .A - ,, t I , ( i �r ♦ t �-.- , . , ,,,.itlfilttii i'! ,. s p s>!3 s�Z'rsa 1G�xpg,4, . r4r � t as : 3 a ,. �.iI f. -I ;E�r s $ `x+ ,,,, ,,4 f., .I -y° 4 .ki,. f, R r :,,t,-....,,.. . • ' k �. + jj.i'�.,:$T 9 Fe p D 1. }F i Z 1Y. !,,'4,...i#4..::.t a r,(4„, $ 1 ,_i +"�.t ,f '4 a.. w ..VI ,4 $$ • MIX'D GREENS, INC. * - t1 'r is a member of the .- II Florida Nursery, Growers & Landscape Association , , , ''4 through June 30, 2015 rat 1 ' - - ■i Member in good y ` •� standing since 1995 FNGLA. - f--.1 Ben Botusky,Executive Vice President FLORIDA NURSERY,GROWERS •` /Ik AND LANDSCAPE AssoaA iON C- 1 teadong Florida s Green Industry g av^ ,7"--,”, .7'77; +77 a •r: r^ ter..•., .:r r;' ^yam rr v� t,`����ir �c C*.rti old,{ 7 �1 i� 1y, �, }_� )` �' ` r. , ' ;4� y r../ / .\\ y1, r, /- \ .^a_.,-.1, , I--n,, ;,.. ,s .y-�-�� . C . ter:—a.�'�. I" y-mac-��• /'i -+.. 7 w - rte` ... A�Ii ... , ,41" " UFIFAS -� ("1. '�" ` uN1VERSITYofFLORIDA .\. : c, Certificate of Training 4 GV13170-2 Best ManagementiceS - Certificate# Flo da. '. ,� GV 13170 y n .. �,+ :,A '"'- /,_.(/ Trainee ID# Ti ie �e �k ;o r, t �, '� u } �'� �s that , y a.iz � )1,6_, 1� g" ,,7,./..i has successfu y-meta re�' + .411 {= s` ned through• ;� the Green Indust ,s � , y .+� � ' 4i..�. , ig a -eloped btu the ' Florida Depar ent � , o- �..�� _ t ri .ruversi of Y orida Institute�rFoad'an Sciences v. ;./•..I i ill' 1 H.Mayer 5/28/2014 1, t- issuer Instructor Date of Class D• rogram Administrator w..: 's>, . -- ,- ,.. --. -: -..-f- ,-,...- --.1,,,,r, .____._ _ . . .: ____. ,.,,, i ..., , , Not valid without seal , ..' ,,,,,,,,„„_ ..... _lir,. yr.,_, � ��,1, \? fir i .!Y� ,r 1: ..\ rL/ 1 t-, 1 . ,,i 4 ' � ' ' AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P�efessionat A'cnitectural and Engineering Services 33 ..... •••••. 1 -- \ „..„...., .,„. ^• ''' , . . : ._, ...... • ._ .,. -RI •- .,. .„.•r . i - t„... . . ... OW_ .: ....,..•.. —.. , , • •-""' .•• 1 ,, 'AO . • ,;• ■ . ,••'".-r-• , ..• ..., '' ,/- •'' ;-- , .. .,... ,. . . •. ,,__.. __,- ,.... . . .., /rt•_:,,•:•-• ,., •-•:".:;;;;,;...,-..!--/. ...rit ., .'4)--. _,.• • -- . : • '71( :'--• -''"---4'.1. , ■ . ".,;.e .si,1 ' ,i. ------■■,,,- _..... • .., ,,,,„ , ,,,, -7...„.....,.. .-:„..„,..: , Experience & , , .. .. . ; •' k...-........: ...... : 4 ., \.... Qualifications . 7.277.''.. .,..-__---=......... . "-; '•-— - • --. •,. • .._...,• . - '4' ... r. 1 I I I 1 I IIP :' ' ■. , 7,. , i.Tr...77,0ki.o..,4::.., ,, • ...... —4 '• . . i: .... 1 . . .. . . . . . . „ .., r, . /"..— ___,.....• > 03 NJ.•• '1,...4 MI i 1 -4-' ;-- • •I -''''' ' t' ..' - s , - i ' --'” ''Ct E. _. i i [-.I - .. - . -/". •,1 ....‘„ ii .,,,, . ,, . , . ,• , ., . 1 ,..-N.: . • __....- -— .•;',' ",.1 ■,. ID s 4 .• . 4..t, ''.‘,, - • . -_, . - . CD ' s' '' ' •. i• 4.- - 1. t.,,,.-'''''' :St.-sic'. :., '• ..... M.-- PM '-•;;T:rir- .'',. l'''', ' Att-At ' •‘■ • CD • -.... .7,...,,,, . :-11\• 'ii'.... : ''' ''', ' ... • - - '- . ..- • ' -lir N '`,..P.f.,-...1.* fA' • --? * ' N'• •'.74NC\ . "...T ' .1.. 'i , CD \".••.' ' r''' '-',;,..'.. •..;.•••' ' A c4. i,,.: . ., \ ., . . , ,... •V44- .1014. . . II .! ••• W ,.• • / \ ,/iif ), .i., .. „ __ , ,/' NI ..,,,;( • .4, ,,.....,, ... 1 •,. , ! _Ai.._%,. , I __±,1 ',..,..‘ „ ,, 4 ......:, : / ' 'SA' Jr . 1... - • 'A 1 ,-.• . , • • ' '4---, / ••• so. , \ ; . A !.' Vi : ,. • ... r ''' a i. • 0104.V\ii\‘7::, •0, , .% -it •: . 1116. ,,:--- —-: ' —.Nc.,,•• -,:,. ,:;.,''; • • , 1 „:•••:•„' 5 ' ''' .Y. • 1 It'N. 1 7,,,..., \.•.,...,i . ,..... , , .. , y, ,. 1 I A ' c 't. f• ,‘ .. .,: k • r -41 , .:-A,.. \A '4- • • , ..,... ,..,::.....,-.: -•,..,:,-7,-,,,n-_, . .• . 0.-•• i - ' Ilt ,,,,,, , . -, ..., ,.. •. , .• ..,, &40111 i • ' 1 • i •• ,...-. 4- , ,, ,' _ _ th.1'f.:':::".."4:...$4,\':\\‘‘,\V■, . \'..---,' ,41. ,, :-:'....' ''' . '•' N . . ■ - ,r• •14 A ,...cy,•,., •,'.'', 411111111111:11. ME . ii&, „IL‘ •-...,:„..„447.„,-, ,, Ti,.,„• „.„............_. 1 . ••r•-• (3(...-. , .--• ,..- 1 ,• ,,...,, •,.-. ,...tipi 1 f .top • III Ill i ''.6.)''''. ' „ - ---- 'A _ •..-• '.." ' '. 4 °'';1 V.'7, '4 - . ! .de I - .' 10•• •1. ..%.,' __ ; — i 0% N.- 4 . IN II 1 ' :ii . •N' x.. i ers. , " SPIt1;17'.*1 ..-- , . ;., . .•".•,0111 '"'-.-••.' 44, ,,.•Y' - .., .... ,..„.....--- ..,-;• I •- 4_ii, „.14.. ,,,, . it ....„..c. ...i. ...- . ..... , .,:..., ii. .1. ,, • ..4.z...,:„. .. ...., ,,.• 1 EL,.. vivor.---- . Ti: ..— , * --re' . ...... .11110 a......- N.• ,,,.....4s.,.......0140 .,.., .•.. '.., q,:i ilk4:,.'2;7 ' . . • 0$ 4, . '. ■ ' ,.* . , • • .... • a,. - ' _ . . . ' ' I A• .... i •, . a, - e . _,..KP.i-:-.,',•'-,.•;...,'.--,,,v',".-.-.' ,,,i$k;.1.,,,-,:;;;I:".C..;•!.. ' • -. .- • • • ,„° ' . • .-.. • , — .... - • ' • . f •. , • t . • . . . . ,.. , .. - ...- • . 4. . • • ' • .,• J - ..'. • . ,.. - • • ' 4'. te . ' ,M • ' . . . ..... . . t l••,, , e • . , . . .- . '- .. . • . ' P. • . , . . . . . • • •. • • 9 - .- . • . . - •, • i . . 1.,... .• . ,• — ., •.. . • , . - ''. • . . . , ... . • ' .... -...;.• .. 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm & Qualifications 2.2 of Proposer Team (Architects & Engineers) ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I — CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION Professional Architectural&Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis" GROUP A-Architecture,Landscape :�Lc,TAT o = - December 2,2014 ; RFQ 2014-346-YG B. ARCHITECT--ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT Greg Ault, Principal-in-Charge 5. NAM_c=_ , AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 305.604.5878 305.447.3580 greg.ault @aecom.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors) (Check) a: z t'J Z Z O F 2 �a. ",-3 a. -,a a,;— 9. Firm Name 10.Address 11. Rote in this Contract I AECOM Technical 800 Douglas Entrance Landscape Architecture, Public Outreach, Services,Inc. North Tower, 2nd Floor Design,Construction Documents, Park a. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Planning,Water Use/Irrigation [✓]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Mix'd Greens, Inc. 28905 SW 162 Avenue Certified Arborist Mix'd Greens Homestead, FL 33033-220 b. ✓ Environmental, Inc. 3 [ I CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE [✓]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. [✓]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. [✓]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ✓](Attached) Au?;HOR'ZE__DF ^a_?E=?CDJCT C, '1ANJATJP?JS=JArE =J?'I 1;C4 S':NJAJ AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A,chitectural and Engineering Services 37 Organizational Chart MIAMI BEACH PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Greg Ault PROJECT MANAGER Gustavo Santana, MLA PUBLIC OUTREACH/ DESIGN CONSTRUCTION COMMUNITY COORDINATION DOCUMENTS Greg Ault Gustavo Santana, MLA Thomas J.McMacken,Jr., RLA Gustavo Santana, MLA Michael Brown,RLA Galen Pugh,RLA Lauren Swan, MLA Andrew Sheppard, RLA, LEED Hannah Plate Lauren Swan,MLA PARK WATER USE/ CERTIFIED PLANNING IRRIGATION ARBORIST Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Dale Morehouse,RLA Michael Gnaegy* Drew Crumpton Jason Bird All staff are AECOM unless noted below: *Mix'd Greens,Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc. 38 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?roressioialA-cnitectu-al and E-gi-ee'ngSe-, _ AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE 3 `,- ._ iI I-!CJ?RENT=R..1 Greg Ault Principal-in-Charge 32 21 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BS, Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, 1978 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Ault's career encompasses 32 years of international experience as a senior planner,landscape architect,and project manager.His work with large-scale,complex,mixed-use urban projects has focused on the conceptual stages of retail,office and residential planning.Presentations include: "Transformative Landscapes in the Global Fabric,"Keynote Speaker,Landscape Architecture National Student Workshop,2012 and"Campus Planning Precedents-National and International Case Studies;'Speaker,Florida International University,201 1.Awards include:APA Honor Award,NAS Patauxent River Vision Plan,2011 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION.(City and State) : (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park RRORESS,2N>-SE=V CES co:Ns-Ruc 'oN Ifaaplicab(e) Miami Beach,FL 1 2014 N/A 3 SR_-. '"CN f3r'?f�..^)?.3i23....: , .\'J=3.E,...:'-'c ROL a. E ,k 1, -Je`forme d'mt'1.,;rent`irm Principal-in-Charge. Master planning,stakeholder facilitation and project visioning for an oceanfront 2.5 acre park on 76th Street and Collins Avenue.This remnant open space in a City Historic District offers the City and Citizens a unique opportunity to create public focal point on one of the highest points in the Beach proper. Project Cost: $67,935(design), $4,610,000(estimated construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park and Parking Garage =RC-t33•c°11_S=w CES CONSTRUCTION'If4pplicablz) Sunny Isles Beach,FL 2007 2011 b. 3 `i 3, ,_ -1__-__ ., __ �r,J. �'Te7'Nlthcj'e trirm ! ' Principal-in-Charge.Landscape,hardscape,and site planning design and construction administration services for a 4 acre urban park with a public performance stage,playground,fountains,multi-use field,dog run,and a 4-level parking garage. Project Cost:$10.3 Million,Project Size: 175,000 SF. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State)> (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ingraham Park SRO="SS!CN? SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of Applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2012 2014 Principal-in-Charge.Landscape,hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park with an outdoor exercise area,civic scale fountain and trellis to create a southern gateway to Coral Gables.Project Cost:$1.2 Million. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED ROESS'CN.a'_SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Coral Pine Park Master Plan - - Pinecrest,FL 1 2013 N/A d. ❑x checx if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge. Project visioning and overall 20 year master planning,landscape design and construction costing services for an important neighborhood park and tennis center in a residential neighborhood.The project includes the successful engagement of the surrounding neighbors and concerned residents to create a design partnership between the constituency,the Village and the design team.Project Cost:$1.5 Million •II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan SRO= ss oNa SERVICES CONSTRUCT:ON(If Applicable) St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A 34 _ ..,, JN '3"_ 3:.7.2_ _ ,.._ - _ __ El „'_.:< ,)13. rf"Jrn-i w!th,urgent firm Principal-in-Charge for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks, downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 39 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Gustavo Santana, MLA Project Manager 11 11 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 18.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture,School of Architecture, Florida International University,Cum Laude, 2002 Bachelor of Design in Plannerural Studies,School of Architecture, Florida International University,Cum Laude, 1999 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Santana is a motivated and resourceful designer and project manager who has been extensively involved in master planning,site and detail design,construction administration on a variety of large and small scale projects including commercial,residential,educational,riverwalk and streetscape design.He has worked closely in providing clients with community and campus master plans,utilizing a full range of planning and design resources to manage change and improve quality of life. Awards include:Award of Merit,ASLA Florida Chapter,2005(Madie Ives Elementary School Butterfly Garden) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park ?RC,ESSICNa:SERV CES CONSTRUCT ON(;f Applicable) Miami Beach,FL 2014 N/A .3)3. _-J=�,.R _�� 3--?4 i�u De.51 2 :7 S' AND 3?_...-l - a, i� Chaok It L,Df,., urm� Nii ::urfent Fir^'1 Project Manager. Landscape,hardscape,lighting, master planning design,and community workshop services for the last oceanfront,undeveloped 2.5 acre park with proposed pedestrian paths,botanical garden like features,bocce court, and sand volleyball courts to create a park that is in keeping with the natural and urban landscape. Project Cost: $67,935 (design),$4,610,000(estimated construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design&Streetscape PROFESSIONAL SERVcES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable t k,• Improvements, Miami Beach,FL 2005 2009 b. Che.c .arule.t Derfurrned nith 7..Jrrent firm Landscape Planner. AECOM prepared urban design and streetscape plans consisting of new planting(such as native grasses,dune vegetation,specimen palms,and shade trees);new sidewalks;a bikeway;street furniture;new curbs; bollards and benches;a pedestrian plaza with specialty paving,coral stone feature walls,showers,foot washers,and drinking fountains;and milled and resurfaced street pavement,as well as pedestrian-scale lighting.Project Cost:$158,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Beachwalk II .RCF_3S ONA_SENV'CES CONSTRUCT ON;ifApplicab Miami Beach,FL Ongoing 2014(Phase 1) C. Project Manager.Landscape and hardscape design of a 5 city block pedestrian corridor extension of the Atlantic Greenway Corridor in South Beach,extends North/South,behind the existing barrier dune system and provides integrated connections to the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent beach. Special consideration was given to existing dune and native plant material locations as well as beach views from adjacent hotels and condominiums. Project Cost:$83,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park and Parking Garage ?RO,=ESSIONAa 3ER`;CES CONSTRUCT:ON 7rApplicable) Sunny Isles Beach,FL 2007 2011 d. Sri_=3_S R o Landscape Planner.Landscape,hardscape,and site planning design and construction administration services for a 4 acre urban park with a public performance stage,playground,fountains,multi-use field,dog run,and a 4-level parking garage. Project Cost:$10.3 Million,Project Size: 175,000 SF. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COM PLETED Ingraham Park PROFESS ONA;.SERVCES CONSTRUCTION(IfApplicabe; Coral Gables,FL 2012 2014 3,3,- _ =' 3 .. _ _ >'. Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park with an outdoor exercise area,civic scale fountain and trellis to create a southern gateway to Coral Gables.Project Cost:$1.2 Million. 330 40 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ! Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Designer/Public Lauren Swan, MLA Outreach 3 1 15.NAME OF Fl RM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture,SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry in conjunction with Syracuse University, 2010 Bachelor of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 Associate of Science in Horticulture,Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, 2003 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Ms.Swan is an experienced landscape planner with a background in landscape architecture and urban planning.She has diverse experience in community design,master planning,streetscapes,site and detail design as well as project management for both public and private sector clients. As the landscape planner for the City of Pembroke Pines,she rewrote the landscape code,wrote several code of ordinance resolutions,drafted comprehensive plan amendments for green initiatives as well as the creation gateway and open space plans.While with the City,Ms.Swan also received a grant for implementation of her proposed streetscape design. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park ,RO=SSS ONA_ R''CES C3"IST?'JCT'CN(if Applicable) Miami Beach,FL 2014 N/A __ _ a. El Check t ^,er..,rrre,ro t Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting, master planning design,and community workshop services for the last oceanfront,undeveloped 2.5 acre park with proposed pedestrian paths,botanical garden like features,bocce court, and sand volleyball courts to create a park that is in keeping with the natural and urban landscape. Project Cost: $67,935 (design),$4,610,000(estimated construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Alhambra Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of Applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2014 2015 b. ao=__ v _r er.:>> ,t a _ X r. Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$34,240(design),$300,000(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Maggiore Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCT ON 7`Sccliccofe) Coral Gables,FL i 2014 2015 ❑X Check if cr7!eC*.Je"JrTei'N'tl '1'm Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,construction services and public outreach for a community park reminiscent of a Chinese Garden located in the city's Chinese Village Project Cost:$34,240(design), $300,000(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Kingsbay Community Park ROFESSiONALSERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if Applicable; Coral Gables,FL 2014 2015 d. MR__= .. a43 3 Check if;)roject performed with current firm Landscape,hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a linear park and pedestrian plaza located along the water's edge. Project Cost:$64,000(design),$450,000(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Tamarac Parks,Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan 7. Tamarac,FL i Ongoing N/A e. Landscape Planner. Parks,recreation and open space masterplan that identifies existing conditions,needs assessments, planning framework and recommendations based on input from city staff and civic engagement. Project Cost: $145,000 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 41 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Michael Brown, RLA Landscape Architect/Designer 15 9 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL • 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture,Colorado State University, 1999 Registered Landscape Architect, FL#6666962 Landscape Architecture Study Abroad, 1998 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Brown has managed over 30+projects in his 10+years as a Landscape Architect in both Washington and Florida.Mr.Brown is experienced in site analysis,site planning,design documentation,hardscape,landscape design&construction,construction methods,bidding,permitting,and construction administration. Mr.Brown has special interest in sustainable infrastructure and often finds way to incorporate green design into projects in a co t effective manner. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan ,,,R0■,-ESS,ONA_SERV CES CONSTRUCTION;If 4pplicable) St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A a. Landscape Architect and Project Manager for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks,downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Kissimmee Lakefront Park ',eOF_SS C'IA_SE,/C_S CCNSTRuCT oN^f aoplicablel Kissimmee,FL 2014 2014 b. ..».i.33 _ J—, w,..,..J 3 ..f..3:30e,31_- .;J-3:. a'47,,,S?-- R;i__ - ti ... Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$25 Million(construction) . II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COM?LETED City of Eustis Downtown Streetscapes 'RC ESS'ONAL SER�i'C_S CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Eustis,FL 2010 2010 'C - - _ - ... a_ __ Check ii erole...,,_fJ�rne]with.;:ir•en:firm Project manager for the historic downtown streetscape design and construction. AECOM provided the City of Eustis with a Downtown Vision Masterptan that serves as the first piece of a revitalization vision. Four blocks of a small downtown retail district have been improved by converting one-way traffic to two way,introducing brick streets,on-street parking,trees, lighting and furnishings which help create a rich and vibrant space for future retailers to open businesses and attract visitors to the downtown. Project Cost: $2 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Mirror Lake Park CRc==5s.C`I..\_SERv10ES CONSTRUcTION(If Applicable) St.Petersburg,FL 2014 2014 ;3!3R_= SCR�- ,', 3,,et sc7;0e,3IZe,cost.a*.;..AND SPEC= YJ'-= d. ❑ Check'I project.pertormeo riwth current s rT Project Manager for this downtown park and has led the phase 1 master planning effort and construction documentation for a pedestrian sidewalk/trail around Mirror Lake in downtown St.Petersburg. This park design reshapes the area around the lake to capture more green space for pedestrian activities. Boardwalks,floating docks,plaza spaces,signage and new plantings,have been designed to respect the area's historic buildings and period architecture. Project Cost: $65,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Nemours Children's Hospital PROF=SS CNAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(IfApplicobie) Orlando,FL 2013 2014 _.. = l] ..x Jni.7t 3ertyrne 1 N,r.h current firm Project Manager that oversaw landscape and hardscape design for the exterior spaces and amenities of the hospital. AECOM's role as Landscape Architect helped guide the project to receive LEED Gold certification by the use of native landscape plant material,native upland restoration,the use of harvested stormwater water for irrigation and recycled building materials. � �Ny� yN 4./ CITY Or MIAMI ?_ofesaiurra1A'criteeturela rdE.rgirreeririgBevices AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT .-..:(Complete one Section E for each key person) ' Air 1111111 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE -- _ 'h,_-±�URR_NT=■RVI Andrew Sheppard, RLA, LEED AP Landscape Architect/Designer 14 12 AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) B.S., Landscape Architecture, Ball State University, Muncie, Registered Landscape Architect, FL#6666767 Indiana, 2000 LEED®Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Sheppard,a Senior Site Planner and Landscape Architect,has 14 years of experience with visioning,design development and implementation for: Master Planned Communities;Resort and Tourism Planning;Urban Design;Employment Centers and Campus Planning. Mr.Sheppard is focused on creating livable communities,and has experience working at all scales of development on a broad range of residential,commercial and institutional projects throu•hout the world. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) f (2)YEAR COMPLETED Central Michigan University Campus Master Plan Update OPESSIOs,a_S_P,'.d c_S I CONSTR CT O`i/ifks.ptiegbie) Mount Pleasant,MI l 2013 j N/A ,3 3R=-_,:..- - .,,3rir .,uoue,sE_�..,us. _:.)AND SPEC FIC ROLE i� _. ._ . -. a. Mr.Sheppard served as the senior designer for the University of Central Michigan campus master plan update. The plan included a walkability and mobility study. A series of week-long charrettes were conducted to gain input and build • consensus from University Stakeholders,faculty,students and the City of Mount Pleasant. Shared spaces,new quads, future building locations and an enhanced street network were included in the design,creating new view corridors and increasing circulation and connectivity throughout the campus. Project Cost: $325,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 63rd Street TOD Corridor Study . PROFES-I,3N..A-5-P`a'S_S ,c'1STRUCTION(if Applicable) Chicago,IL 2013 N/A '31 3RIEF'JESCR?T 3N'.:3r e°3..00e,..i _. .ost arc.)4N3 SPEC'PIC ROLE <] 3..--.,b. . . ._ ---5-.- ' , Mr.Sheppard served as the Lead Designer in developing a vision for the 63rd street corridor,located in the Washington Park neighborhood,south side of Chicago. A week long visioning workshop was conducted to ensure that the final recommended plan has a broad level of support and understanding. Elements such as land uses,safety,building orientation,parks and neighborhood character were discussed. Fee: $150,000 (IIII EA1DLOCATION(CityandStte) (21 YEAR COMPLETED Kissimmee Lakefront Park ',- -S:,4>4 -Y' ' 'r'Def Ce0" Kissimmee,FL 2014 2014 Senior Designer. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$25 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St. Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan St.Petersburg,FL I Ongoing N/A _� '3)3r-a n'S;,R:-, '.ON'gr.a:icoce. y Ye 005t,et.:. AND SPEC.P.C.Ri; - d. Project Designer for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks, downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Forest City Military Communities � O =sso1a_5- ; i :, Various Locations,US 2013 N/A 33 7 0 J t_, ost st .)AND Sa U_= X❑ 3 ,__ _.. _ . Mr.Sheppard serves as the Senior Designer and Project Leader for several Forest City Military Communities. One of many projects is the Southern Group(Arnold AFB,Keesler AFB,Joint Base Charleston and Shaw AFB). Services include:visioning, programming,large scale master planning,site specific area studies,landscape architecture,parks and project coordination. The goal at each base is to create outstanding living environments that are well planned,safe,resource 4a-- efficient,and accommodatin:to thou;htful rank separation. Project Cost: $650,000(design) . .: E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FORTH'S CONTRACT ...,,,, (Complete one Section E for each key person) 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Thomas J. McMacken,Jr., RLA Landscape Architect/ Construction Documents 37 17 NAME OF° `"f AND LOCATION+v''''eiird St• AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 18.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University, Registered Landscape Architect, FL#1193 Baton Rouge, LA, 1977 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc) Mr.McMacken has utilized his 37 years of experience as a registered Landscape Architect to expand his firm's ability to provide clients with construction documentation that compliments the design capabilities that have long been the strength of the firm.His passion for site design, construction documentation,project management,and quality control has been transferred into systems and procedures that have contributed significantly to the firm's mission of planning and designing livable communities. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 4 (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Orlando Amway Center Streetscape =`3 ESS.:,,A_SE?' ^=3 CC`ISTRUCT'ON 'f.apolicable) Orlando,FL 1 2008 2011 a. .3'a 3_7.-)- ., 3 3-_ .-,. -,•i. ' - _ - 0 Chen 7 3'1)lectpertJ.- esiwrath.7.,—en:'I'm Project Management Oversite and QA/QC. AECOM provided the City with design services that included conceptual design, design development,final design and construction documents as well as bid and construction phase assistance. Project Cost: $875,000(design),$4 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Lake Beauty Park Redevelopment SRO-ESS.C`+A_SE ,i'C'ES CONSTRUCTION lfAppiicable) Orlando,FL 2012 2013 '3)eP_=DES2P Pr 2N C--.:,,. Z_ i, AND _ X b. ':,rred'N,t;h';,,,,t`if.n Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC of the redevelopment of the 4 acre Lake Beauty Park in Downtown Orlando at the Gateway to the Orlando Health campus.The project required use agreements between three land owners and addressed a•variety of open space,environmental quality and transportation needs for both the community and the on-campus population at Orlando Health. Project Cost: $250,000(design),$2.9 Million(construction)` . (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COM PLETED Church Street Streetscape '==-ESA "-3:-=';`, NS �CT,GN !f op',°�; Orlando,FL 2007 2012 .3'? E 3I _ <CE ❑x :-- : - LandscapeArchitect of Record/QA/QC. As a sub-consultant to WBQ Design and Engineering,AECOM provided services that included data collection and public participation,concept development,design development,construction documentation, and permitting services. AECOM also provided bid phase assistance and construction observation assistance. The one mile streetscape project is estimated to be a$12.5 million capital improvement. Project Cost: $271,200 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Sanford Avenue Streetscape PROFESS ONA_SERY•CES CONSTRUCTION(1f Applicable) Sanford,FL 2013 2013 -- _ _ . _.. AV:j?• :-:?.:_= 0 Ch-'CH:f D,Die:;t cer',),med wl*-n 3ur■ent firm d. Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC. AECOM assisted the Community Redevelopment Agency of Sanford in developing an innovative streetscape for a 5-block section of Sanford Avenue. The proposed concept includes a cultural corridor pathway on the east side of the street that will provide opportunities to incorporate historical markers and art into the streetscape. Another unique element of the streetscape is a curbless edge providing the pedestrian with barrier free access. Project Cost: $298,000(design),$2 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Greenville Downtown Streetscape Design 'ROFESS ONA_SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(IfApplicablei Greenville,SC 2011 2011 e. 3'3',E_3ES.,? '3'i'3, Sz• A4;.3 - ",__E c' •r=7 m i r;n Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC for this comprehensive streetscape project providing schematic design for 10 miles of Greenville's downtown streets for the City of Greenville. The project inventoried the existing conditions of the streets and developed a Streetscape Master Plan that developed into Schematic Design Drawings. Project Cost: $250,000 44 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ! Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Architect/ = - ,; --' =71 Galen Pugh, RLA Construction Documents 25 1 Month 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Registered Landscape Architect, FL#1522 B.A. Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University OPTED Course Completion Certified Planner(AICP) #019833 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training Awards,etc) 7 r.'ug is a'egis ere. an.scape A rc I ec •rojec •anager wi over •years o governmen a an. priva e an.scape A rc I ec ure experience, which includes working as a Sr.Landscape Architect and a Sr.Planner. He additionally has provided professional services such as procurement of consultants,directing and reviewing the preparation of site plans,construction documents and landscape plans. Mr.Pugh has coordinated the public participation process and conducted public and steering committee meetings for several projects in the public realm. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED • First Avenue Streetscape(Phase II) I ',O==SS!ONA_S3?TrC3S CO'ISTRUCT3v:if apolicable' Sanford,FL 2009 2010 • a. The intent of this project is to closely match the streetscape of improvements previously completed on First Street.Plans and services included the conceptual and final design of a Gateway feature introducing the historic district. Design elements included in this design were:Sidewalk and street curb layout,planting and paver design,parking layout,irrigation plans, lighting and electrical plan,site furniture selection and layout,streetscape details and Gateway entrance architectural design details. Project Cost: $1.5 Million (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED .,;3=-SS'ONA,_Sc=`i!C_3 CC^IS ,.._.C'1 f-1 :aCle, State Road 17-92 Streetscape Sanford,FL 2010 2011 Mr. Pugh prepared beautification plans for the stretch of 17-92 between Airport Blvd and Park Avenue.This streetscape project will add new life to a portion of this heavily used and vital commercial corridor.The scope of the project will include the installation of gracious shade trees,grand and dramatic palms near the 417 bridge,colorful accent trees and a variety of ground covers rich in texture and color. Project Cost: $300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Punta Gorda Linear Park 2,35E33 C 35.5 353,_35 _3333RL0 ON'if5cohcaci., Punta Gorda,FL 1 2010 2013 3)33_= _SC%J. _ 3r' :...- i ._,5. 3r.7.. AV;3-'= • ?C__ ❑ _ Mr.Pugh provided design services for Phases II and III of a three phase linear park in Punta Gorda. Mr.Pugh was involved in providing landscape architecture package,for the Phase II section. The project included a 10'asphalt walking trail/bike path,rest/rain stations,lighting,accent paving design street crosswalks,pedestrian bridges over the creek where required, and appropriate site furnishings to include benches,water fountain,bollards,and trash cans. Project Cost: $1.2 Million (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park RDR3s3iON5_SERV!c_s CONSTRUCTION If Applicable, Lake Mary,FL 1 2012 TBD 1 3R 3'_=,.?p__.1 3-,f 3i"_ 3,7 ....A = R.._,±. d. ❑ Chock:f project performed with currant firm Mr.Pugh prepared Landscape Architecture plans for this half acre park. A historical timeline will lead up to the focal point of the park that will include a fountain monument to be constructed in a future phase. All of this will be surrounded by lush Florida Friendly landscaping within an innovative and environmentally sensitive rain garden. Interpretive signage will also help to educate patrons on the environmental benefits of this type of garden. Project Cost: $350,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Winter Springs Town Center Trail R.0=335 3N,a_s_-`;033 ..ONS35U0 33 r'fdoo,icr;bl, Winter Springs,FL 2007 2009 3 3-R= _3: )- , 3. . _:?D_ ❑ Check if protect performed with current firm The trail was designed as a walk through a French Provincial Garden.A series of garden rooms were created,highlighted by garden pavilions,classical pergolas and a welcoming fountain at the north entrance to the corridor.Landscaping is designed to be colorful and lush,with stately Sylvester Palms guiding your way along the Trail. o".A333 __,a;,1 3.',0 1 2,;,,,, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 45 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Designer/Construction j _J , p.-- '" _'" Hannah Plate Documents 1.5 1 AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, 2013 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Ms.Plate joined the Buildings and Places group in October 2013,and her experience and background has been a vital asset to the landscape architecture team. Awards include: Environmental Protection Agency Campus Rainworks Challenge winner:2013,University of Florida Department of Landscape Architecture:2013 ASLA Student Honor Award 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED ...:' Tamarac Parks, Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan -_=-=33-`,r_ 2=3 ;CVST 'JCT�,1'ifJpoiicocIe Tamarac,FL Ongoing N/A _3=__ __c _ _ ❑x 7 :. ., _ a. The City of Tamarac selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Specific project role included providing long range visioning for selected parks within the long range system vision. Project Cost: $145,000 In .���=3C C'�a_3_��`�°,3 1°`i3 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Lake Nona Boulevard Landscape Improvements, Phase III -R;;c".'I Orlando,FL 1 2013 2014 3;3R'_ =SCR -IO'i 3'. , ir._ J')S'.et: 'I;3P32.2-.,u.__ X ❑ Cheok r J� .t J'.rf..'m?d N. _:_ii-?f,„ b. As the gateway roadway into the Lake Nona community,the boulevard enhancements set the design standard for the rest of the development.Improvements were designed based on guidelines previously developed including decorative roadway and pedestrian paving,plazas,columns and fencing,walls,adjacent trail layout and surfacing,median and roadway edge landscape,and irrigation.Specific project role included landscape designer. Project Cost: $100,000(design),$3.5 Million (construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) :' ` ., z� ��,; (�)YEARCOMRLETED Winter Springs Intersection Improvements =R°=ESS C'+a�3E= ES CO'S'RJCT oN f*1poi caeie Winter Springs, FL Ongoing 2014 (3)3R'==DESCR'RT ON „_e.cost.st.;,PVC 33.E..3'=C R°_= QQ °neck:f prclect Jertormed w!tn current firm Implemented a series of safety and operational improvements in the vicinity of the intersection of S.R.434 and Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs.The project is comprised of roadway improvements and streetscape treatments.Specific project role included landscape designer for the$149,000 project. (i)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Re-Imaging The Flamingo Master Plan Everglades National Park, .ROFEss,CNAL SERV'cES CONSTRUCT•ON(If Applicable) ,, Florida,University of Florida Capstone Project N/A N/A 1 d. 3'3R E=JESCR'- CV 3r a' . -,37 .?aVC 3?EC=T. ❑X ;.heck if project performed with current firm This project explored the role of ecotourism within the Everglades National Park through an evaluation of the 2010 Flamingo Master Plan in conjunction with traditional site analysis. Resulted in an ecotourism master plan that compliments the efforts made by the Park Service and suggest further steps on how to develop Flamingo as an ecotourism destination. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Woodward Academy Wayfinding and Focal Entryway Master Plan PROFESS DNAL3ERVCES CONSTRUCTION if Applicable) Atlanta,GA Ongoing N/A Currently on going,this project has an anticipated completion date of 2014.Provided a limited scope master plan;that includes campus destination wayfinding for vehicles and pedestrians,as well as preliminary designs for a focal entryway into campus.Specific project role included landscape design of the focal entryway for the$105,000 project. STANDARD FORM 330 i1/2004) 46 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH i Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM . 1 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) • 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Park Planner 14 14 AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Raleigh, NC 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture,The Ohio State Registered Landscape Architect: FL#6667065 University, 2005 Registered Landscape Architect: NC#1703 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Kuhn has been integrally involved in all phases of the planning and design process including project management,design,construction document production,in addition to public involvement such as:interviews,focus groups,stakeholder meetings,public presentations and lectures.Having led various parks and recreation system master plans and design projects,Mr.Kuhn understands the importance of transparent and inclusive processes, time and budgetary constraints,and multidisciplinary team environments. Awards: Florida ASLA Honor Award,2013 Haulover Park General Plan. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Haulover Park ,RO-ESS.NA-s_R"; 2CNSrRJCT:3,4 , p,,,cocie Miami-Dade County,FL 2012 N/A 3' ?' .,> ‘ S'' - __ ❑x ck,,,if 2 i,-..:,'"7/-7`,C ti,,to_.,r-e -rlrm a. Project Manager and Designer. Project included the development of a park planning p ro ram plan for the 260+acre heritage park for Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation Department.Traffic circulation and site design were primary areas of focus for the project.Final proposed improvements to state route A1A were presented to and approved by FDOT District 6.Other significant improvements to the park included the complete redesign of the County's only dry rack storage for boats and a boat launch facility as well as the planning for as many as two parking structures with the park. Project Cost: $81,600 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) W (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade County Parks and Open Spaces System Master Plan °■OFESSIONAL SERVC_S ,;,`iS"RJO-":'' .<-:o,,...... Miami-Dade County,FL 1 2008 N/A b. Park Planner. This 50-year,unifying vision for a livable,sustainable,Miami-Dade County addressed five major components: great parks,great public spaces,great natural and cultural places,great greenways,trails,and water trails,and great streets.Through a series of public involvement workshops,lifestyle/demographic analysis,analysis of existing systems, neighborhoods,various community and county-wide visions,benchmarking and economic analysis,AECOM developed a series of guiding principles for all five components. The Parks and Open Space System Master Plan was successfully approved by the County in March of 2008.Project Cost:$377,000. co 111 TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SSiONA_SER E V'CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Raleigh Parks,Recreation and Cultural Resources System Plan, RROF- Raleigh,NC 2014 N/A 31 3RIEF DESCRi.-CNi 3rer eccoe.s,ze,:.3st.atc.,AND 3?_C,=■C ROLE C=I Check f aroject performed with current firm Project Manager/Lead Planner. Major components of the Plan will include Neighborhood Demographics Analysis;a Maintenance,Staffing and Programming Analysis;an access-based Level of Service Analysis(LOS);interviews with a cross section of the project stakeholders;a mail/telephone survey;an illustrative vision;a cost estimate and Implementation Strategy. Project Cost: $415,000 (City (2)YEAR COMPL ETED (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(C Tamarac Parks,Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Tamarac,FL Ongoing N/A 3`3R=_D_S,., C`■ 3' -..,Z_..35t.,tc`aN2 3 -= d. Q Check;f project performed with current firm Project Manager. The City of Tamarac selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Project Cost: $145,000 I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Parks and Open Space Master Plan ?ROFESS ONa_SERV'CES CONSTRUCTON(ff Applicable) Doral,FL 2010 N/A 3;3R 3 0 a ..t !a i _ 0 heck t Crolect performed with current firm Park Planner. AECOM developed a City-Wide Parks and Open Space Master Plan that analyzes access to and develops a Vision for the City's Parks,Open Spaces and Recreation Facilities. Project Cost: $175,000. -1vz,]v. .•v+ '1 i :0-i AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 47 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Drew Crumpton Park Planner 1 1 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Raleigh, NC 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture, North Carolina State University, 2013 Bachelor of Science in Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, 2010 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training Awards,etc.) Mr.Crumpton is a landscape designer and park planner with AECOM,providing support for projects serving public agencies nationwide.He specializes in parks and recreation system master plans and graphic visualizations for transportation design projects. Mr.Crumpton has been involved in all phases of the planning and design process including project support,demographic analysis,graphic visualizations,and public involvement such as; workshops,focus groups,stakeholder meetings,and public presentations.Working on various master plans and transportation projects has provided Mr.Crumptpn with an understanding of the value of thorough analysis,inclusive participation,clear and concise presentation,and collaborative team environments. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Raleigh Parks,Recreation and Cultural Resources System Plan, S_,`; :o' r4'cT v .lco;;.7,7.5,9; Raleigh,NC 2014 N/A a. Project Manager/Lead Planner. Major components of the Plan will include Neighborhood Demographics Analysis;a Maintenance,Staffing and Programming Analysis;an access-based Level of Service Analysis(LOS);interviews with a cross section of the project stakeholders;a mail/telephone survey;an illustrative vision;a cost estimate and Implementation Strategy. Project Cost: $415,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Rocky Mount Parks and Recreation Master Plan -Rc-Ess'�''" Rocky Mount,NC Ongoing N/A b. ;3)3RIE.DESCR!PT O\l ].a S - -. i.... Landscape Designer and Planner. The City of Rocky Mount selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Project Cost:$110,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERV'CES CONSTRUCTION E 'If applicable) River of Grass Greenway Feasibility Study and Master Plan ?ROF- Miami-Dade County to Collier County,FL Ongoing 2015 D - -ck r 3.,ant firm C. Landscape Designer. Funded by a Federal Transit Administration grant through the National Parks Service and Miami-Dade County,the River of Grass Greenway Feasibility Study and Master Plan includes a comprehensive evaluation of the social, environmental and economic impact of this potential 75 mile greenway.Project includes an extensive analysis of benefits and cost;multi-phased implementation plan;and over 25 community meetings and three weeks of on-site workshops. Project Cost: $846,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED West Kendall District Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami-Dade County,FL 2015 N/A d. 31 3a Pr r7: ?` S'_.,=C El Ch,c;t ..a e N•*h *irm Landscape Designer and Planner. Provided a park planning program plan for the 164 acre park and sports complex. Part 1 Master Plan is completed. A business plan is 20%completed. Project Cost:$30,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Chuck Pezoldt Park aFOFESSIONA.SERV CES 'CONSTRUCTION(If 4p0fc,:ble• Miami-Dade County,FL 2014 N/A 3, == �� , r'' , _ j.7 ._ YJ_= Ei ,Hack f 0'7iect firm Landscape Designer and Planner. Provided a park planning program plan for the 40 acre park.Project Cost:$40,000 STANDARD FORM 330;1 20^4'. 48 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Dale Morehouse, CID, CLIA Water Use/Irrigation 20 9 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Fort Collins,CO 15.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BA,Colorado State University Certified Irrigation Designer(CID), Irrigation GIS Certification, Natural Resources, Front Range Community Association-Residential,Commercial,Golf Course College Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor(CLIA), Irrigation Association 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Morehouse has worked on a variety of projects for both public and private sector clients,including residential developments,corporations, educations institutions,parks and government facilities. He has designed irrigation systems for nine US embassies. He is certified by the Irrigation Association as a Certified Irrigation Designer(CID)in residential,commercial and golf course specialties,and as a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor(CLIA),he has conducted system evaluations and audits,taught irrigation and water conservation classes,and experienced in cross- connection control.He is experienced in AutoCAD,SketchUp,GIS and computer systems management. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Boulder Parks,Central Control Irrigation Study I 3S!C'+A SER`i cES CONSTRUCT'ON; E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jason Bird Water Use/Irrigation 15 5.5 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Sarasota, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Civil Engineering Coursework, University of Central Florida 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc) Mr.Bird is an experienced engineering professional with a focus on all aspects of land development,including commercial and residential projects,utility infrastructure projects,and roadway projects.He also has experience taking projects from feasibility studies to conceptual planning,through full design,permitting,and construction administration.Mr.Bird has focused on water resources;infrastructure assessment; infrastructure sustainability;green infrastructure(low-impact design),SSIM water balance modeling;and LEED,Green Mark,and GBES sustainability evaluations for municipal projects,master planned communities and federal facilities. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS fl)TITLEA FILOCATIfti (£ttandStote) (2)YEAR COM PLETED National Park Service,Flamingo Masterplan and Design Program PIP ==SS ON. P C CONSTRUCT'oN-If4ppticobie, Everglades National Park,FL 2010 N/A Infrastructure assessment and recommendations for sustainable redevelopment for a long range masterplan and design program for this historic Mission 66 developed area.The project included on-site workshops.The masterplan exemplifies the sustainable vision of the national park and guides planning,design,construction,restoration,and use of Flamingo for the next 50 years. Project Cost: $250,000(including subs) (1)T,TLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Waterfront Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of Applicable) St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A b 3 3`=I= 2Ni - a,,,3j-: „'C__ o, ^r_ v.'i �nttir7 Sustainable Infrastructure lead for waterfront masterplan,including climate adaptation,considering affects to existing and future development and critical infrastructure related to storm surge,wave action and sea level rise. Project Cost: $500,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NAVFAC Midlant,SSIM Pilot Study =_C- N.I 3_- 7.3\13-='...:0- IpeIrcac,a) Little Creek,Virginia 2010 N/A • Water lead and SSIM modeller for project that developed a process for evaluating the current status of the base as it relates to federal mandates.Projected the masterplan and impacts related to incorporating all active 1391 projects out to FY 2020. Project Cost: $300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NAVFAC,Guam Joint Military Masterplan Water Plan ,.=C3 ONA_SEP','CES ' CONSTRUCTION(if Applicable) Implementation,Guam 2011 N/A d. 3;3 =S' vN 3,.?T 3:3 Involved with creating the implementation plan for water modeling results and recommendations.The implementation involved USGBC LEED certification,tracking,and continued monitoring and support to ensure the anticipated performance goals were achieved. Project Cost: $1.5 Million (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US Army Corps of Engineers,Huntsville District,Comprehensive PROFESSIONA_SER'i!CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Energy and Water Masterplan,Various Locations 2011 N/A ,r2z 3 NO ?O-_ e, ❑X Check if arol=_ct certo,red with current firm Performed evaluation and project planning for utility improvements to 31 Army bases.Project focus was to meet water and energy reduction requirements as mandated by the federal government.The water reduction included a 26%reduction in water consumption intensity.Evaluated various conservation and reuse strategies to achieve this goal for all 31 bases, including some Located in deserts where water is an extremely valuable resource. Project Cost: $850,000(water only) 50 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Michael Gnaegy Certified Arborist 37 37 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc., Homestead, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 11.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. ISA Arborist/Pesticide Applications/Wholesale Tree Farm & ISA Certified Arborist- ISA FL#0278A Nursery/All Tree Services- Removal, Relocation,Trimming, Florida Department of Agriculture&Consumer Root Pruning& Landscape Planting Services./Grounds Services Applicators License#CM13479 Maintenance./Mitigation &Natural Area Restoration Services, DERM BMP Certificate #GV13170-1 Wetlands,Coastal, Pineland, Hammock Areas. Site Clearing& Preparation. Mulching Services. 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member&Board of Director at FNGLA 2008-2013;Member AFNN(Association of Florida Native Nurseries;FNPS(Florida Native Plant Society);Miami- Dade Cooperative Extension Overall Extension Advisory Committee-Best Management Practices Certification GV13170-1;Florida Department of Agriculture Consumer Services-Categories(5A)Aquatics,(6)Right of Way&(21)Natural Areas Management;OSHA 30 Hr Training;Florida Grades& Standards;FNGLA Bebe Greer Award. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation Old Cutler Road Landscape Project =Yc==ss,cva_3ER'i OES CQNSTRUCTi0N:If Applicable) City of Cutler Bay,FL 2013 2013 Landscape Install a. 3'3R E-3E1-33R P-3'1''3,--3f_.,pa ,iz ANDS? 3.=C,_E E a•-;k rr.;n1,m,3e r •'Ta3 n, :;.1r 1'r firm Landscape Upgrade Old Cutler Road for the City of Cutler Bay. Secure-Plant Materials with L/A site specific designations/ installation. Project Total: $405,000 The actual site preparation/plant selection&installation&remedial monitoring/ reports. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation-Miami Marine Stadium -RO.ESS'CNA_SER'/CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) City of Miami,FL N/A 2012 b .___.__.___.._____.___...-___..___.______ _ - E eck it protect.oerformed Nit)/::urrant firm Create a Retention Area/Improve Drainage&Mitigate Wetland Planting. Wetland Drainage project: $120,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation Oak Grove Park �R -E35���- =�' =� eNST�ucT O'� Ifaocl,cb a; City of Miami,FL 2014 2014 3)3R_� ES3R' v 3'of�cooe.siZ cost.atc AND SR37_ L__ 2,,c3 t�r^,iry.L J°rfpriTted Nlih current firm Relocation of Specimen Oak Trees, Established a Value Engineering-Design/Methodology to Root Prune/Relocate Massive Specimen Live Oaks&Other Large Specimen Native Trees. Design/Build full irrigation system. Establish a method to relocate several large specimen trees within Oak Grove Park with 100%guarantee of survival. Project Total: $165,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation-Virginia Beach Key Parking—Key Biscayne 'ROBSS!CNA-SERV'C_S CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) =- City of Miami,FL N/A 2014 d• 3'3R E= S ?,_C,I 3r•ar _.. _ ,,_ -__7 R's__ 0 .'hack f prof=ct performed with current firm Establish a 1,000 linear foot native planting buffer for Virginia Key Parking Buffer. Prep/Installations. Project Total: $63,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation/Special Tax District 0 333 Na_s=RV 033 ONST-ucT oN rlf.�oet c:coiei City of Miami,FL 2011-2012 2011-2012 3 33_ i E _ Design/Bid Various areas throughout the"Special Tax District"Right of Way Neighborhood Improvements. $75,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P-ofessionai A.cnitectural and Engineering Services 51 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.T µ.a, ► _,7i0N(,:„ ;te) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park , PROFESSIONALSERV°CES CONSTRUCTION.'lfApp(icoblel Miami Beach,FL 2013-2014 N/A City of Miami Beach Park and John Rebar (305) 673-7000,ext.6579 Recreation Department johnrebar @miamibeachfl.gov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) ' The City of Miami Beach(City)selected . ' AECOM to provide professional services to _ [" develop a Master Plan for Altos Del Mar Park. A •� ,r i, .,� Altos Del Mar Park, located on Collins Avenue !� (3 '} L_ between 76th and 77th Street, is one of the r �, / " last undeveloped beach front parcels within the City of Miami Beach.The undeveloped 2.5 yx�� �: -.1 -'M - acre park currently offers a wide variety of •!- ' - .— passive public space and open space uses j ... located along 76th Street.Along the southern, ,4 ' ` � '� '" edge of the park,there is a Miami-Dade • County Public Library and a municipal - a.' L a. surface parking area.The park also offers an r' I - - =_ - - undefined pedestrian connection to the '"--� beachwalk and beach.The principle design ; Illi .• `il goat for Altos Del Mar Park is to provide for passive and accessible recreational needs of -., .l Y . area residents through a neighborhood "n tip' :'.' ,"''F : 'i - �^.. r,.,-' A, _,,,,;,> -tam :, i master plan development involving a process .- , .. „r 'r ,' that included the assistance and input of community residents and the approval of City's key stakeholders.A preferred 1 ±" alternative for Altos Del Mar Park was =^` selected involving the community residents IP ♦ - , .; and the City's key stakeholders that will aim , a ; -. �. •W:, - -- f to provide for the needs of area residents.• 4. 4 i , , ' ' . '" --N . ,,,,,.. i . \,.- -A.' i ii, , .It.,. ‘- a �'� 4 PROJECT VALUE . ; I� $67,935(design),$4,610,000(estimated Mili construction) ' RELEVANCE TO MIAMI ' BEACH PROJECT •8 _,. ___ • Intensive Public Involvement ; „op, • Open Space Assessment • Connectivity to Other Public Spaces keir° r..;, Beach Access Improvements \ • ADA Facilities and Features 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. '11 FIRM.NAME_ ;2` ='?^:1_OCAT2,,'C _,-;State) (,3` ROLE AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture &Urban Design,Master Planning b. _ 2, -',R\3__3A ON ";1,j end State, .3 -- c. t _?b;VA�bt_ 2' =ai,;_3'2,1"0,, 2- x,.;S°ate' {3) ROLE 52 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 70 projects,if not specified. Ca •,4ete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(Cit�r,•,,dStn d 2�..YEAR.0+lMfLEFEQF Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape Improvements, Miami Beach,FL 2005-2009 2008-2009 . ♦I _ -' - _30NT.4CTT__ErHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach David Martinez, PE, LEED AP (305) 673-7071 progress @miamibeachfl.gov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) -111111111k- r '4 *lr .. Y' i .\"yin{-,i _ y , , 9�, • ,' s^ or ."` 'A:\ il I I 110 i. ,?.■ „,.. .maR ; 'Y 'tr;•.-7-4"1•17" M • mm + } . ., _ _ - _ iii�-+.{ 1 .` PROJECT VALUE x :. '' - . * $3.5 Million(construction) RELEVANCE TO MIAMI .R ,:. :. ; BEACH PROJECT " ' �' :,„ ~ ; • Streetscape and Urban Design Improvements AECOM prepared urban design and streetscape plans for most of the recently • designated National Register Collins Waterfront Historic District on Miami Beach. Extensive Public Involvement This project area includes many historic MiMO landmarks,such as the • Construction Administration Fontainbleau and Eden Roc Hotels designed by Morris Lapidus. • Beach Dune Restoration The Oceanfront neighborhood project includes improvements to the City owned public right-of-ways and several"greenway"locations between the Atlantic Ocean and Indian Creek. The streetscape enhancements consist of new planting (such as native grasses,dune vegetation,specimen palms,and shade trees); new sidewalks;a bikeway;street furniture;new curbs; bollards and benches;a pedestrian plaza with specialty paving,coral stone feature walls,showers,foot washers,and drinking fountains;and milled and resurfaced street pavement,as well as pedestrian-scale lighting. Traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures,such as landscaped "bump- outs"at street corners and specialty crosswalks at intersections,were also implemented. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. '1,=PM NAME _',‘,1 _..�T nn1 ^n!i 3.--u-ii '3` ��,-_ AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture & Urban Design,Master Planning b. (11;R',1 NAM= '' =Rbl.DCAT 0N,'City and State) 3` RC_= C. (1`.RM:NAM, 2` Y!RM LOCATION(City and Stite) 3` �-= STANDARD'CPM'_33u 1 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 53 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Cam∎Lets one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(9 4:1M,StFte, 111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111 , ,23 YEAACOMPL4-T .t, Wiffillar 14, Heritage Park __ - Sunny Isles Beach, FL 2007-2008 2009-2011 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFO' 3 N '_:ONTACT NAME c FOINT OF CC`.-ACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Sunny Isles Beach Chris Russo (305)947-0606 crusso @sibfl.net 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) till `_ =— _ - _ C.n t t. , r ,..4:7,- .. . , i ,w SN..• t r R r . s< w+ ! a . a . ,lii, .i r6, lk i $ - A ww aew' -�'. ���/I s- _ ..,6 ,....." —_ r'v w�.;%.Eaa. ' _ :, ail — ti ' c'1 if,i,-.' - I_ ,-,-.-—'' - . . . 704. iii - -,--__ i--, . le N m•L r C.- ik 7::::.,'',,,,,‘ ':-'-',‘,- -i.... . --- ' - ' '‘'.11'''•: I-If likillpi _ AECOM is responsible for the landscape, hardscape and site furniture design from concept through construction administration for a 5 acre park and parking '`' garage within the City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida.This passive park will be the largest park within the City and will include walking paths, multi-use lawn, performance stage,park pavilion, playgrounds and custom interactive fountains PROJECT VALUE and sculptural elements. $10.3 Million Custom detailing and a strong native plant palette will provide the users with an RELEVANCE TO MIAMI oasis within a busy urban setting along one of the most important north/south beachfront roadways in Florida. BEACH PROJECT • Open space assessment AECOM's landscape architects worked closely with our in-house architects and Public involvement •engineers responsible for the design of the adjacent parking garage and park structures in order to create a smooth transition and cohesive design for the ▪ Recommended improvements for vehicular and pedestrian users visiting the site. pedestrian connectivity • Visioning 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. R,.1.O^ar,v "2,,,,,,.,,s.a-,1 fl1 ?�;_E AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture & Urban Design,Master Planning b. !1i FIRM NAME 2' =R\I_O.AT'ON'City and State) ,31 :RO_= C. (71 FIRM NAME '2' ='?M_GOAT ON'Ciry and State) 3; ROLE 54 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Atcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 2A-TIT_,;'t'-.• !.T•.,.p.,,"A . d State) :.:2 XW?CQMPI-EfED �,:. Ingraham Park --.---,-,,,_ Coral Gables, FL 2013 - 2013 2013 - 2014 d4 :. .x, sRMA71ON a. PROJEC_ '4E' 7, =OI`I-"-OONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Coral Gables Ernest R. Pino, RA, LEED AP (305)460-5004 epino @coralg ables.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(lnctude scope,size,and cost) W'I. - ar+'.I • 1, 4 li+"'J : •1:-.,, - - •.• •_. 1011.-., ''AA ,./4„ . ,' inr . ...,, % t r . rellPr- . i e' Id 1-,%. '.---.' -r.- -- .ii; . ''' . *POMO v AWL' - -.W-- p... AECOM prepared landscape, hardscape, lighting,site planning design, public • outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park in the City of i0-° r. Coral Gables. The City's first goal of the park project is to create a world-class civic feature in PROJECT VALUE the southern part of Coral Gables that is on par with the architectural features that epitomize the character of the City. The signature feature of the park will be $1,028,000 Million(construction) a stone fountain,which is inspired by a fountain that is in the Alhambra in Spain. The fountain is framed by a curved trellis with stone columns and with white RELEVANCE TO MIAMI Bougainvilleas growing up them,which provides a backdrop to the fountain and creates a quiet,shaded area to sit and enjoy the park. BEACH PROJECT • Park Planning and Design In addition to creating a landmark for the southern part of Coral Gables,the Intensive Community Outreach •second goal of the project is to create a high quality park that will enhance the quality of life of local residence by providing a neighborhood park and creating a • Native Landscape recreational hub to serve the recreational needs of the users of the multi-use • Construction Administration Commodore Trail that runs through the park. The site amenities will accomodate both active and passive uses and include an outdoor exercise equipment area, chilled drinking water fountains,a mister for trail users, pet fountains and waste stations, multi-use field, picnic tables,and benches. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (2; cIRM LOCATICN'City and Store) r'3' R`?'E v AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture & Urban �` Design b. ,I,=R.\1 4),M 2' 'I 4t4 LOCAT'ON;City end Stare` 31 RC_E c. ,1)=RM NAAL 2' r.R.M i_OCAT'ON 2 y Jr-:3'-.3. '.3' RO'_E AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH i Professional A-cnitecturat and Engineering Se-vices 55 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section or each.roject.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and'+ ` INIMIMIE 22.YEAR COMPLETED Haulover Park oon==;c'^ya_c-o,,:,?g CONSTRUCT ON''f.apelicable Miami-Dade County,FL 2010-2012 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a aRCJ=CT OWNER c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONENUM3ER ' Miami-Dade County Park and Joe Webb, Park Planning I (305)755-7731 i Recreation Department Section Supervisor I jwebb @miamidade.gov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AN D RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cast) ; `:•� _ '. � , , :,', Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation ;< Department sought to develop a park planning program for an existing 246 acre — t' i natural resource heritage park. Project • r highlights included a traffic and circulation r .4 evaluation of existing park conditions, 1111 extensive research of comparable beach and boat launch facilities,and planning of 4 ', parking facilities.As one of seven heritage "� " I p �- .� parks of Miami-Dade County, Haulover 1 $ 1 4 { Park has a long history and is one of the most popular beaches in the country. I ,1 Through an integrated planning effort i * s ! incorporating park program planning and = • " transportation planning,over 23 acres of t-- 4 parking will be restored to open green a�� space while expanding the park's services t' 't;> and infrastructure to accommodate ' i growing population needs. Development of .., ., , a new internal parking circulation network '' .. " for vehicles and pedestrians involved coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation and Miami-Dade County Transit.Capital improvements determined r .. during planning are estimated at$80 " 11 million.Awards: Florida Chapter American Society of 1 I, +- ? Landscape Architects Award of Honor,2013 j ri �. "` PROJECT VALUE , iii:411,i/ 1 , ;, $81,600(design) 4#;..,, , , ,,,,,k. ,.7.)-', ' > RELEVANCE TO MIAMI i ,...-- / -Pri: fi ii. , . BEACH PROJECT i. • Park and open space planning ,.,�w ;,W. • Recreation planning • Public Involvement • Visioning _ �, . -Oriel - ,=_,. .,! ';' ; ; 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. 1'=OM"I.1y,i- C2! '-'RM_OCAT`ON 7 t'/1"d Stare, .C1 AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Orlando and Coral Gables,FL; Landscape Architecture & Raleigh,NC Urban Design,Park Planning b C1'ziRM NAME ,2 =-RMLOCAT ON Oity and State) : ?J__ c, CT)FIRM N:AME 2) c RM_CCAT ON Oct and State,) 3) RC_E 56 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ProfessionatArcnitecturat and Engineering Services AECOM G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completiong table. 28.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 27.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT Place"X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Greg Ault Principal-in-Charge X X X X Gustavo Santana, MLA Project Manager X X X X x Michael Brown,RLA Landscape Architect/Designer Lauren Swan,MLA Landscape Designer/Public Outreach Andrew Sheppard,RLA,LEED AP Landscape Architect/Designer Thomas J. McMacken,Jr., RLA Landscape Architect/Construction X Documents Galen Pugh,RLA Landscape Architect/Construction Documents Hannah Plate Landscape Designer/Construction Documents Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Park Planner x Drew Crumpton Park Planner Dale Morehouse,CID;CLIA Water Use/Irrigation Jason Bird Water Use/Irrigation Michael Gnaegy Certified Arborist 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) I Altos Del Mar Park Master Plan 6 2 Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design 7 and Streetscape Improvements 3 Heritage Park 8 1111111.1ngraham Park 9 1111 .Haulover Park 10 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 57 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. Ranked as the#1 engineering design firm by revenue in Engineering News-Record magazine's annual industry Exceptional Local knowledge and rankings,AECOM is a premier,fully integrated infrastructure and support services firm,with a broad range of markets, renowned global expertise. including transportation,facilities,environmental,energy, water and government.As of October 16,2014,AECOM and URS Corporation have joined as one company,with approximately The AECOM Team will provide the perfect combination 95,000 employees—including architects,engineers,designers, of local knowledge and experience with renowned planners,scientists and management and construction services professionals—serving clients in more than 150 global expertise to innovatively, cost effectively and countries around the world.We provide a blend of global efficiently deliver all components of the Miami Beach reach,local knowledge,innovation,and technical excellence Professional Architecture and Engineering Services in delivering solutions that enhance and sustain the world's project as defined in the Request for Qualifications built,natural and social environments.A Fortune 500 company, Statement. AECOM revenue of approximately$19.5 billion during the 12 months ended Sept.30,2014. 111■11.11 TIE TOP 500 White AECOM is worldwide,we truly value the local relationships we have developed with our clients in South #1 DESIGN FIRM • Florida. For us,the client is always the center of attention and #1 PURE DESIGN "`'we firmly believe that a reputation is built on each individual #1 TRANSPORTATION project resulting in a successful sum of work.We strive to be #1 GENERAL BUILDING • the firm of choice for both our clients and employees in every #2 POWER S,'1414F, discipline we practice,and in all geographic areas we serve. #2 WATER ` We are glad our efforts have not gone unnoticed!AECOM was proud to be recognized in 2014 as one of the"World's Most #3 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN -; Ethical Companies"by Ethisphere Institute and as one of #3 SEWER+WASTE - Financial Times'"Best Workplaces". #4 HAZARDOUS WASTE A Recovery in Need of Speed cai.11�ttlllup.Y9ve w 441r r+n:'ar AECOM has enjoyed a reputation of being a leader in TOP 500 AECOM developing innovative solutions to meet the complex and ever 2014 DESIGN FIRMS changing needs of our clients.We have achieved many engineering breakthroughs by looking beyond the standard when the client needs more.This type of vision,coupled with our senior engineers'familiarity of the regions they serve with WORLD'S MOST TM access to global experts, results in more than 85 percent of our business coming from repeat clients. ETH icAL Our Coral Gables office will serve as our local point of contact O and will perform the majority of the work anticipated under COM PANIES® this contract.This office provides landscape architecture, planning and design services for municipal clients throughout the South Florida area. As a supporting role our Orlando office ��/��/�/�/ will provide onstruction document production assistance and M1/ 1111 •�.ETHISPHERE.COM QA/QC services. We will also utilize our Raleigh office for park planning services and AECOM specialists in Sarasota and Denver for water use/irrigation needs. AECOM's record is distinguished by hallmark attributes such as being ranked#1 in Engineering News Record(ENR)Top 500 Design Firms and one of America's most ethical firms for the fourth consecutive year. • I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE " „` The foregoing is a statement of facts. 3 November 21, 2014 di/74" Randy Mejeur, MS, LEED AP, Principal 58 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM Atea■COM 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER Of any) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2014-346-YG PART II - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offrces,complete for each specific branch ofce seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH CF-FiCE;NAME 1 ,. r,R ESTABLISHED 4 DUNS NUMBER AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1970 003184462 (ATS HQ DUNS) 5.OWNERSHIP 800 Douglas Entrance, North Tower,2nd Floor 3•TYPE 2c.c■TY 2d S TA 7= 1 __ _.:- Corporation Coral Gables FL I 33134 b SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Large Agustin Barrera—Vice President , NAME OF F'RM ,f bicck 23 3 c-rc' =`;z; 5b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 1 5c E.MA'L ADDRESS AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (305)447-3546 gus.barrera @aecom.com ?b YR.ESTABLISHED i 3c DUN:NuIA-ER Former names and/or names of affiliated companies of AECOM Spillis Candella:1960; 'AECOM Services(formerly Spillis Candela): Technical Services, Inc.(ATS): Spillis Candela,AECOM Services,Inc., EDAW:2005 :829320501; EDAW: 097502921; EDAW,Earth Tech,among others Earth Tech:1970 'Earth Tech:008609203 ?. Eli'?LO'YLES B CI:S�IoLI i 10. PROFILE OF F!RM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS C.No.of Employees p.Revenue a.Function ri cialit,. 3 ;ase�:: . r„t;;a Coda. o.Exp P rie.nca Index Number Code 06 Architect 384 23 ,A05/A06 Airports 10 08 CADD Technician 447 15 C15 Construction Management 10 12 Civil Engineer 1,229 16 C14 Conservation and Resource Management 9 15 Construction Inspector 417 4 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost Eng.&Analysis 8 16 Construction Manager 338 5 D04 Design-Build—Preparation of RFPs 8 21 Electrical Engineer 192 4 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 9 23 Environmental Engineer 483 3 E07 Energy Conservation, New Energy Sources 10 .24 Environmental Scientist 599 1 E09 Env Impact Studies;Assessment;Statements 10 30 Geologist 387- 1 G01 Garages;Vehicle Maint. Facilities; Parking Decks 8 37 Interior Designer, 58 4 H01 Harbors;Jetties; Piers;Ship Terminal Facilities 8 39 Landscape Architect/Designer ' 92 2 H03 Hazardous;Toxic;Rad Waste Remediation 10 42 Mechanical Engineer 228 3 H04 Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning(HVAC) 9 47 Planner: Urban/Regional 331 4 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking Lots 10 48 Project Manager[subset of other categories] [1,463] [16] H09 Hospital and Medical Facilities 10 57 Structural Engineer 391 8 001 Office Buildings; Industrial Parks 10 58 Technician/Analyst 790 6 P06 Planning(Site, Installation&Project) 10 60 Transportation Engineer 374 4 R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings;Structures; Facilities) 10 62 Water Resources Engineer 108 2 SO4 Sewage Collection;Treatment;and Disposal 10 S09 Structural Design;Special Structures 8 , S11 Sustainable Design[subset of other categories] [10] LEED AP[subset of other categories] [480] [13] T03 Traffic and Transportation Engineering 10 _.--'tic'ees 3,702 33 \V1/02 Water Resources; Hydrology;Groundwater 10 U.S.Total 10,550 138 W03 Water Supply;Treatment&Distribution 10 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS Less than-3100.000 3 32 million to less than S5 million j.;�S @t7 re e''Gc ['Jac ni:7?.. r si-73,,u7 at r.g;7t) 2 51 C+:i.000 to:ess than=3250.000 7 -35 million to less trail 310:million a.Federal Work 10 3 5253 00C to iess than 3500.000 3 3 IC million to less than S25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 4 35C0.0C.0 to ias3 than$1 million 3 325;r•illic,n t,ieJS than.353 million, c.Total Work 10 5. 31 million to less than$2 million 10. 550 million or greater 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a. i� �u�` b DATE 'Wy,< � �� January 2014 c.N"AN• FILE Raynette '.Takiza = 1 ice P eside t,Marketing Services—Government Technical Services AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330 5.2:24 PAGE 5 Part II—CORALGABLES-Jan2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 5' 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER (If any) ARCHITECT — ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2014-346-YG PART H - GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 1 Mix'd Greens, Inc., > < 1977> 4 < 60 3536 558 Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc.,> < 2009> < 83 0777509 2b.STREET 28905 SW 162 Avenue �1JNERS iiP• 2c CiTY 'T= _'? a.TYPE Corporation Homestead I FL 33033-2200 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Sa.POINT OF CONTACT NA^a- = TITLE Small Mick Gnaegy/President 7.N 1.1.11,7^_ ", k_: a -- Sb.TELEPHONE NUMBER Mix'd Greens, Inc. Office(305)245-1722 mixdgreens bellsouth.net Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. Cell(305)345-6108 8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 7 _? -\?LISHED 3c.DUNS N N/A 1977> Mix'd Greens,Inc. #60 3536 558 2009> Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc.#83 0777 509 y. 'EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a Function c.No.of Employees - — ----- _.-__— ---__��--__-- Coda 39 Landscape Architect 12 4-10 Miami-Dade County Vendor:> j 4 (Arborist) A03>Agricultural Development; Grain Storage; Farm ' 1 Mechanization E12>Environmental Remediation 4 F06>Forestry&Forest products 3 106>Irrigation; Drainage 4 R11>Rivers;Canals;Waterways; Flood Control 4 Cher Employees U.S.Total 12 4-10 _ 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than 3100.000 6 32 million to less than$5 mil'i (Insert reverue index number shown at right) 2 $100 OCC .c Bess than -32.-70.000 7 3:7. !es3 i,an 310 r- a.Federal Work 2- 3. 3250 000 Imo,:e53 than S5��0 000 5 > _ ri!li;�� .,, 'r?3,ti"lar' Jc.. b.Non-Federal Work 4 4. $500.00 to less than Si million .325 io lass than 350 c.Total Work 4 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 3 SIlN, „o_ - 1\41,C, G wo e�/ — October 24, 2014 c.N.- 15 AND i D T T'L E Mick Gnaegy, President ,a.U-iHCR'-EC= R MANDATORY USE DATE 80 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P ofessional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 2 • 3 Financial Capacity AECOM is a 100% publicly owned corporation that is traded on the New York Stock Exchange(NYSE). Should we be awarded the City of Miami Beach Professional Architectural and Engineering Services contract,our firm has the financial and staff capacity to complete the project. In the link below,you can find our most recently filed 10-K which includes a full copy of our audited financials publicly filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission: http://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/868857/000104746913010484/a2217354z10-k.htm A=COM NR 13-1101 Media Contact: Investor Contact: Paul Gennaro Lynn Antipas Tyson SVP&Chief Communications Officer SVP,Investor Relations 212.973.3167 646.432.8428 Paul.GennaroOaecom corn Lynn.Tvsoniaaecom:om AECOM reports fourth-quarter, full-year fiscal year 2013 results Quarter and Full-Year Highlights* • Free cash flow of$145 million; $356 million for full-year fiscal 2013. • Backlog of$16.6 billion with$1.8 billion in new wins in the quarter. • EBITDA margin of 11.6 percent, 9.4 percent for full-year fiscal 2013. • Full-year company invests$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares. • Reported EPS of$0.77, full-year fiscal 2013 EPS of$2.35. • Company targets full-year diluted EPS of$2.35 to$2.45 for fiscal year 2014. LOS ANGELES(Nov. 12, 2013)—AECOM Technology Corporation(NYSE:ACM) reported fourth-quarter revenue of$2.1 billion and net service revenue', of$1.2 billion. Operating income equaled$123 million, reported net income2 was$77 million, and diluted earnings per share equaled$0.77. Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year YOY% ($in millions.except EPS) _ Q4 FY12 Q4 FY13 Change FY12 _ FY13 YOY%Change Reported Figures Gross Revenue 2,083 2,079 - 8,218 8,153 (1) Net Service Revenue(NSR)1 1,340 1,244 (7) 5,184 4,977 (4) Operating Income (199) 123 NM 54 377 603 Net Income2 (225) 77 NM (59) 239 NM Earnings per Share2 (2.05) 0.77 NM (0.52) 2.35 NM Operating Cash Flow 226 160 (29) 433 409 (6) Free Cash Flow3 211 _ 145 (31) 370 _ 356 _ (4) Adjusted Figures for FY12 Operating Income 137 123 (10) 390 377 (3) Net Income2 92 77 (17) 259 239 (7) Earnings per Share2 0.83 _ 0.77 (7) _ 2.30 2.35 _ 2 *In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012,the company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of$2.88 per share or$317 million net of tax. All growth comparisons that follow in the text of the release are adjusted to exclude the impact of the goodwill charge;all comparisons are also year over year unless noted otherwise. "During fiscal year 2013,we increased our mix of revenue and profits from emerging markets,enhanced our technical and leadership capabilities in high-growth end markets, and implemented strategic account management teams to better serve our multinational clients,"said John M. Dionisio,AECOM chairman and chief executive officer. "Our diverse geographic footprint allows us to manage through various macroeconomic conditions around the globe." --more-- AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitecturat and Engineering Services AECOM 2-2-2 "Our commitment to deploying capital to its best and highest use supported our investment of$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares of our stock in fiscal year 2013,"said AECOM President Michael S. Burke. "We also invested$82 million in niche acquisitions that expanded our geographic reach in key emerging geographies. Lastly,we launched AECOM Capital, a platform that allows us to play an important role in providing financing as well as design and construction services to our clients." New Wins and Backlog New wins in the quarter of$1.8 billion were driven by strength in the company's transportation and water businesses. From a geographic perspective, new wins were led by Europe,Asia and the Americas. The company's book-to-burn ratio4 was 0.9X for the quarter, with total backlog at Sept. 30, 2013, of$16.6 billion, up three percent. These results demonstrate the underlying strength of AECOM's business as clients increasingly turn to the company for its integrated service platform and global expertise. Business Segments In addition to providing consolidated financial results,AECOM reports separate financial information for its two segments: Professional Technical Services(PTS)and Management Support Services(MSS). Professional Technical Services The PTS segment delivers planning, consulting, architecture and engineering design, as well as program and construction management services to institutional,commercial and public sector clients worldwide. Revenue of$1.9 billion was up 2 percent, and net service revenue(NSR), declined 5.8 percent to$1.1 billion as declines in the Americas and Australia on an NSR basis were only partially offset by double-digit gains in emerging geographies, such as the Middle East and Asia, as well as solid growth in Europe. Construction services also posted gains in the quarter. Operating income declined 3.5 percent in the quarter, however, operating income margin increased on both a sequential and year-over-year basis,aided by improved cost and efficiencies. Management Support Services • The MSS segment provides program and facilities management and maintenance,training, logistics,consulting, technical assistance and systems integration services, primarily for agencies of the U.S. government. Revenue declined 15.6 percent to$220 million, and net service revenue declined 17.1 percent to$134 million. As expected, these results reflect actions to reposition away from lower-margin projects to new, higher-margin services—and these actions have improved MSS segment margins throughout the year. Operating profit declined 25.1 percent in the quarter; however,on a full-year basis, operating profit increased 50.4 percent aided by a 284-basis-point increase in operating income margin, consistent with the company's strategy to improve the profitability of this segment. Tax Rate The company's fourth-quarter effective tax rate was 31.8 percent,with a full-year rate of 27.9 percent, inclusive of non- controlling interest deduction. --more-- 62 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM A=COM 3-3-3 Cash Flow Cash flow from operations for the quarter was$160 million and$409 million for the full year. Free cash flow,which includes capital expenditures of$15 million in the quarter and$52 million for the full year,was$145 million and$356 million, respectively. Days sales outstanding(DSO)improved by three days to 88 in the quarter. Share Repurchase During the quarter,the company invested$61.6 million to repurchase 2 million shares. On a full-year basis,the company invested$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares. $365 million remains in the company's current share repurchase authorization as of the end of the company's fiscal 2013 year. Balance Sheet As of Sept. 30,2013,AECOM had$601 million of total cash and cash equivalents,$1.2 billion of debt and$1.05 billion in committed bank facilities with$899.8 million in unused capacity. Fiscal 2014 Outlook AECOM is targeting EPS for fiscal year 2014 of$2.35 to$2.45. The mid-point of the guidance range assumes flat NSR growth and stable EBITDA margin. In addition,the company is targeting a full-year tax rate of 29 percent and a full-year share count of 99 million shares. The company expects the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to be similar to last year as a percentage of our full-year earnings. Five-Year Free Cash Flow Target AECOM reaffirms its five-year cumulative free cash flow target of$1.3 billion to$1.8 billion,which includes fiscal years 2013 through fiscal 2017. AECOM is hosting a conference call today at 11 a.m. EST, during which management will make a brief presentation focusing on the company's results, strategies and operating trends. Interested parties can listen to the conference call and view accompanying slides via webcast at www.aecom.com. The webcast will be available for replay following the call. 1AECOM's revenue includes a significant amount of pass-through costs and,therefore,the company believes that revenue, net of other direct costs(net service revenue,or NSR),which is a non-GAAP measure,also provides a meaningful perspective on its business results. See the accompanying reconciliation of revenue,net of other direct costs,to revenue,the closest comparable GAAP measure. 2Attributable to AECOM. 3Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and is a non-GAAP measure. See the accompanying reconciliation of free cash flow from operations,to cash flow from operations,the closest comparable GAAP measure. 4Book-to-burn ratio is defined as the amount of gross revenue wins divided by gross revenue recognized during the period. About AECOM AECOM is a global provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation,facilities, environmental,energy,water and government. With approximately 45,000 employees around the world,AECOM is a leader in all of the key markets that it serves. AECOM provides a blend of global reach, local knowledge, innovation and technical excellence in delivering solutions that create, enhance and sustain the world's built, natural,and social environments. A Fortune 500 company,AECOM serves clients in more than 140 countries and had revenue of$8.2 billion during the 12 months ended Sept. 30,2013. More information on AECOM and its services can be found at www.aecom.com. Forward-Looking Statements:All statements in this press release other than statements of historical fact are"forward looking statements"for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including any projections of earnings, revenue, profit margins, cash flows, share count or other financial items;any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; and any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward looking statements are reasonable,actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward looking statements. --more-- AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 63 AECOM 4-4-4 Important factors that could cause our actual results, performance and achievements,or industry results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in forward-looking statements include: uncertainties related to global economic conditions and funding, audits, modifications and termination of long-term government contracts; losses under fixed-price contracts; limited control over operations run through our joint venture entities; misconduct by our employees or consultants or our failure to comply with laws or regulations;failure to successfully execute our merger and acquisition strategy;the failure to retain and recruit key technical and management personnel; and unexpected adjustments and cancellations related to our backlog. Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward looking statements are set forth in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation,to update any forward looking statement. This press release contains financial information calculated other than in accordance with U.S.generally accepted accounting principles("GAAP"). In particular,the company believes that non-GAAP financial measures such as revenue, net of other direct costs,and free cash flow also provide a meaningful perspective on its business results as the company utilizes this information to evaluate and manage the business. This non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for financial information determined in accordance with GAAP,and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the company's results as reported under GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. --more-- 64 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ; Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM • • AECOM • • • • 5-5-5 AECOM Technology Corporation Consolidated Statement of Income (unaudited-in thousands,except per share data) Three Months Ended • Twelve Months Ended • September 30, September 30, September 30, September 30, 2012 -2013 %Change ., 2012 2013 %Change Revenue $ 2,082,911 $ 2,079,087 (0.2%) $ 8,218,180 $ 8,153,495 (0.8%) Other direct costs 742,785_ 834,968 12.4% 3,034,303 3,176,520 4.7% Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-,,GAAP), 1,340,126 1,244,119 (7.2%) • 5,183,877 4,976,975 (4.0%) Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs 1,195,968 1,103,906 (7.7%) 4,762,018 4,526,987 (4.9%) Gross profit '. .144,1581 _ 140,-213 _ (2.7%) - - 421,859 449,988 6.7% Equity in earnings of joint ventures - 10,509 6,464 (38.5%), 48,650 24,319 (50.0%) General and administrative expenses (17,753) (23,953). 34.9% ' (80,903) (97,318) 20.3% Goodwill impairment (336,000) ' - (100.0%) • (336,000) - (100.0%) Income from operations- • • (199,086) 122,724 NM 53,606 _ 376,989 603.3% Other income 1;963 1,480 (24.6%) ' 10,603 3,522 (66.8%) Interest(expense) - (10,999) (10,242) (6.9%) '_- (46,726) (44,737) (4.3%) Income(loss)before income.tax expense ' (208,122) 113,962 NM.. . 17,483 335,774 1820.6% Income tax expense 16,746 35,735 113.4% 74,416 • • 92,578 .24.4% Net income(loss) (224,868) 78,227 NM • (56,933) 243,196 NM Noncontrolling interest in income of consolidated • - subsidiaries,net of tax • (37) (1,659) 4383.8% (1,634) (3,953) 141.9% Net income(loss)attributableto AECOM $ (224,905) •$ • 76,568 NM- $ (58,567) $ 239,243 NM Net income(loss)attributable:to AECOM per - share: Basic $ (2.05) $ 0.78 NM $ (0.52) $ 2.38 NM Diluted $ (2.05) $ 0.77 NM $ (0.52) $ 2.35 NM Weighted average shares-outstanding:' Basic I 109,962 98,028 (10.9%) 111,875 100,618 (10.1%) Diluted 109,962 99,652 (9.4%) . 111,875 101,942 (8.9%) NM-Not meaningful • • • • • • • AEcbM + CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 65 A=COM - 6-6-6 . - AECOM•Technology:.Corporation t' Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Information' ' - • - . , - :- (unaudited i - -. (unaud- --m thousands) September 30,2012 - - • September 30,2013 Balance Sheet Information' - • - Total cash and cash equivalents $ 593 776. $ . •_ 600,677 Accounts receivable net_ 2,395 88 1.. •' 2,342,262 Working capital . _ 1,068,891. 1;078,053 Working capital,net of cash and cash.equivalents, •;: 475,115 - -. 477,376 Total debt = 1,069,732 • . :. 1'173325 Total assets - '' .5,664,568 5,665,623 Total AECOM stockholders equity. 2,169 464 2021443_ ;, Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Se tember 30, September 30, ',-September 30, September 30, • - 2012 2013. . -_ 2012 - • 2013 Cash Flow Information • • Net cash provided by'operating activities $ 226,389 `$ 160;147..'. $ - 433,352 $ • 408,598`', Payments for expenditures ,(15,069) (15,050)" (62,874), (52,117) • Free cash flow $ x 211;320 $ 145,097:=. ::'$ ' 370,478 $ 356,481 --more- • • J - v . 66 : . ••CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM ' AECOM • 7-7-7 AECOM Technology Corporation Reportable Segments (unaudited-in thousands) Professional Management Technical r Support Services Services Corporate Total Three Months Ended September 30,2013 Revenue $ 1,858,660 $ 220,427 $ - - $ 2,079,087 Other direct costs 748,363 86,605 - 834,968 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 1,110,297 133,822 - - 1,244,119 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs 974,677 129,229 - 1,103,906 Gross profit 135,620 4,593 140,213 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 2,051 4,413 - 6,464 General and administrative expenses • - - (23,953) (23,953) Income(loss)from operations $ 137,671 $ 9,006 $ (23,953) $ 122,724 Gross profit as a%of revenue 7.3% 2.1% - 6.7% Gross profit as a%of revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 12.2% 3.4% - 11.3% • • Three Months Ended September 30,2012 - Revenue $ 1,821,822 $ 261,089 $ - $ 2,082,911 Other direct costs 643,074 99,711 - 742,785 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 1,178,748 161,378 - 1,340,126 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs 1,040,333 155,635 - 1,195,968 Gross profit • 138,415 5,743 - 144,158 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 4,224 6,285 - 10,509 General and administrative expenses (17,753) (17,753) Goodwill impairment (155,000) (181,000) - (336,000) (Loss)from operations $ (12,361) $ (168,972) $ (17,753) $ (199,086) Gross profit as a%of revenue 7.6% 2.2% . - 6.9% Gross profit as a%of revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 11.7% 3.6% 10.8% --more-- • • • • AECOM CITY OF MIAMI•BEACH ► Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 67 • • • AECOM 8-8-8 - -• AECOM Technology Corporation • Reportable Segments (unaudited-in thousands) Professional Management, • Technical Support - Services Services Corporate Total Twelve Months Ended September 30,2013 Revenue $ 7,242,859 $ 910,636 $_ - $ 8,153,495 Other direct costs • V 2,826,452 350,068 . - 3,176,520 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) _ 4,416,407 560,568 - 4,976,975 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs 3,999,523 527,464 ' - 4,526,987 Gross profit 416,884 33,104 - 449,988 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 12,356 "11,963 - 24,319 General and administrative expenses - - (97,318) (97,318) Income(loss)from operations • $ 429,240 $ 45,067 $ (97,318) $ 376,989 • Gross profit as a%of revenue V 5.8% 3.6% - 5.5% Gross profit as a%of revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 9.4% 5.9% - 9.0% Segment assets $ 5,761,057 $ 541,887 $ (637,321) $ 5,665,623 Contracted backlog $ 8,378,426 $ 374,871 • $ • - $ 8,753,297 Awarded backlog 6,886,068 914,011 - 7,800,079 Total backlog $ - 15,264,494 $ 1,288,882 $ - $ 16,553,376 • • Twelve Months Ended September 30,2012 • . Revenue $ 7,276,858 $ 941,322 $ - $ 8,218,180 Other direct costs 2,669,534 364,769 - 3,034,303 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) • 4,607,324 576,553 - 5,183,877 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs 4,183,552 578,466 - 4,762,018 Gross profit 423,772 (1,913) - 421,859 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 16,771 31,879 - 48,650 General and administrative expenses - - (80,903) (80,903) Goodwill impairment• (155,000) (181,000) - (336,000) Income(loss)from operations $ 285,543 $ (151,034) $ (80,903) $ 53,606 Gross profit as a%of revenue . 5.8% -0.2% . - 5.1% Gross profit as a%of revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) , 9.2% -0.3% - 8.1% Segment assets $ '5,557,153 $ 564,834 $ (457,419) $ 5,664,568 Contracted backlog $ 7,661,021 $ 838,146 $ - $ 8,499,167 Awarded backlog 6,323,970 1,194,748 - 7,518,718 Total backlog $ • 13.984,991 $ 2,032,894 $ - $ 16,017,885 • • --m ore-- • • • 68 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM • • AECOM 9-9-9 AECOM Technology Corporation • Regulation G Information ($in millions,except per share data) • • • • Reconciliation of Revenue to Revenue,Net of Other Direct Costs Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2012 Jun 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Sep 30,2012 Sep 30,2013 Consolidated Revenue $ 2,082.9 $. 2,067.5 $ 2,079.1 . $ 8,218.2 $ 8,153.5 Less:Other direct costs 742.8 831.5 835.0 3,034.3 3,176.5 Revenue,net of other direct costs $ 1,340.1 $ 1,236.0 $ 1,244.1 $ 5,183.9 $ 4,977.0 PTS Segment Revenue $ 1,821.8 $ 1,847.1 $ 1,858.7 $ 7,276.9 $ 7,242.9 Less:Other direct costs 643.1 745.1 748.4 2,669.6 2,826.5 Revenue,net of other direct costs • $ 1,178.7 $ 1,102.0 $ 1,110.3 $ 4,607.3 $ 4,416.4 • MSS Segment Revenue • $ 261.1 $ 220.4 $ 220.4 $ 941.3 $ 910.6 Less:Other direct costs 99.7 86.4 86.6 364.7 350.0 Revenue,net of other direct costs -$ 161.4 $ 134.0 $ 133.8 $ 576.6 $ 560.6 • Reconciliation of Income from Operations Before Goodwill Impairment to Income from Operations Three Months Ended Sep 30,2012 • Consolidated PTS MSS Corporate Income(loss)from operations before goodwill impairment $ 136.9 $ 142.6 $ 12.0 $ (17.7) Goodwill impairment (336.0) (155.0) (181.0) - Loss from operations • $ (199.1) $ (12.4) $ (169.0) $ (17.7) • Reconciliation of Net Income and Diluted EPS Before Goodwill Impairment to Net Income and Diluted EPS Three Months Ended - Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2012 Sep 30,2012 • Net Income Net Income • Attributable Attributable Net Income to AECOM Diluted EPS Net Income to AECOM Diluted EPS Amount before goodwill impairment $ 92.3 $ 92.3 $ 0.83 $ 260.3 $ .258.6 $ 2.30 Goodwill impairment,net of tax (317.2) (317.2) (2.88) (317.2) (317.2) (2.82) Amount including goodwill impairment $ (224.9) $ (224.9) $ (2.05) $ (56.9) $ (58.6) $ (0.52) • Reconciliation of Amounts Provided by Acquired Companies • Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Provided by Excluding Effect Provided by Excluding Effect Acquired of Acquired Acquired of Acquired Total Companies Companies Total Companies Companies Revenue,net of other direct costs-Consolidated $ 1,244.1 $ 38.0 $ 1,206.1• $ 4,977.0 $ 128.3 $ 4,848.7 Revenue,net of other direct costs-PTS Segment 1,110.3 38.0 1,072.3 4,416.4 128.3 4,288.1 --more-- • • • • • AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 69 AECOM • • 10-10-10 AECOM Technology Corporation Regulation G Information ($in millions,except per share data) Reconciliation of EBITDA Before Goodwill Impairment to Net Income Attributable to AECOM Three Months Ended Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 EBITDA before goodwill impairment $ 103.0 $ 101.6 $ 129.0 $ 163.9 $ 84.7 $ 102.5 $ 135.1 $ 144.5 Less: Goodwill impairment - - (336.0) - - - EBITDA 103.0 101.6 129.0 (172.1) 84.7 102.5 135.1 144.5 Less: Interest expense' (10.4) (11.0) (12.5) (10.4) (10.4) (11.3) (11.0) (9.6) Add: Interest income2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Less: Depreciation and amortization (25.5) (25.3) (26.1) (26.1) (23.9) (23.9) (23.6) (23.0) Income(loss)attributable to AECOM before income taxes 67.5 65.7 90.8 (208.2) 50.8 67.8 100.9 112.3 Less: Income tax expense 19.6 16.7 21.4 16.7 12.7 14.0 30.1 35.8 Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM $ 47.9 $ 49.0 $ 69.4 $ (224.9) $ 38.1 $ 53.8 $ 70.8 $ 76.5 • Fiscal Years Ended September 30, • 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EBITDA before goodwill impairment $ 358.5 $ 417.5 $ 525.4 $ 497.5 $ 466.8 Less: Goodwill impairment - - - (336.0) - EBITDA 358.5 417.5 525.4 161.5 466.8 Less: Interest expense' (11.9) (10.7) (40.8) (44.3) (42.3) Add: Interest income2 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 Less: Depreciation and amortization _ (84.1) (78.9) (110.3) (103.0) (94.4) Income from continuing operations attributable to AECOM before income taxes 263.7 328.7 375.9 15.8 331.8 Less: Income tax expense 77.0 91.7 100.1 74.4 92.6 Income(loss)from continuing operations attributable to AECOM 186.7 237.0 275.8 (58.6) 239.2 Discontinued operations,net of tax 3.0 (0.1) - - - Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM $ 189.7 $ $ 275.8 $ (58.6) 1 Excluding related amortization 2 Included in other income Reconciliation of Total Debt to Net Debt Balances at Sep 30,2012 Jun 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Short-term debt $ 1.6 $ 12.0 $ 29.6 Current portion of long-term debt 161.0 1.5 54.7 • Long-term debt 907.1 1,135.2 1,089.0 Total debt 1,069.7 1,148.7 1,173.3 Less: Total cash and cash equivalents 593.8 507.6 600.7 Net Debt $ 475.9 $ 641.1 $ 572.6 Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow Three Months Ended Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 Net cash provided by/(used in)operating activities $ (6.4) $ 11.4 $ 202.0 $ 226.4 $ 67.1 $ 85.2 $ 96.1 $ 160.2 Capital expenditures (18.3) (13.9) (15.6) (15.1) (12.9) (11.7) (12.4) (15.1) Free Cash Flow $ (24.7) $ (2.5) $ 186.4 $ 211.3 $ 54.2 $ 73.5 $ 83.7 $ 145.1 Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 228.6 $ 158.6 $ 132.0 $ 433.4 $ 408.6 Capital expenditures (62.9) (68.5) (78.0) (62.9) (52.1) Settlement of deferred compensation plan liability - - 90.0 - - Excess tax benefit from share-based payment(associated with DCP termination) - - 58.0 - - Free Cash Flow $ 165.7 $ 90.1 $ 202.0 $ 370.5 $ 356.5 tgAtt 70 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 1 of 13 D Decide with Confidence Supplier Qualifier Report Print this Report Copyright 2014 Dun&Bradstreet-Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 263159923 ATTN: Name1 Report Printed: OCT 16 2014 In Date BUSINESS INFORMATION AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 555 S Flower St Ste 3700 Los Angeles, CA 90071 This is a headquarters location. D-U-N-S®Number: 15-356-1212 Branch(es)or division(s)exist. Telephone: 213 593-8000 D&B Rating: 5A2 Financial strength: 5A is$50 million and Fax: 213 593-8729 i9 over. Composite credit Chief executive: MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES- appraisal: .2 is good. CEO D&B Supplier Risk: 1 Stock symbol: ACM SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK(SER) RATING FOR THIS FIRM : 1 Year started: 1980 V 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Employs: 45,500(400 here) All amounts are displayed in local currency. High Medium Low Financial statement date: JUN 30 2014 Sales F: 8,153,495,000 Net worth: 2,074,094,000 History: CLEAR • DNBV D68 Risk Management Financial condition: GOOD D&B PAYDEX® Dun&Bradstreet Supplier Qualifier Report: -- r=- T As requested,a copy of AECOM's Supplier D&B PAYDEX: 70 Qualifier Report(SQR)for AECOM When weighted by dollar amount,payments to l Technology Corporation(Parent Company) suppliers average 15 days beyond terms. and AECOM Technical Services,Inc. o ma (Contracting Entity)was sent to the City of Miami Beach on October 16,2014. 120 days stow 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates Based on up to 24 months of trade. https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional A'cnitect. a and FngineeringServices 7° D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION .Page 2 of 13 SUMMARY ANALYSIS D&B Rating: 5A2 Financial strength: 5A indicates$50 million and over. Composite credit appraisal: 2 is good. This credit rating was assigned because of D&B's assessment of the company's financial ratios and its cash flow. For more information, see the D&B Rating Key. Below is an overview of the company's rating history since 01/27/05: D&B Rating Date Applied 5A2 11/24/11 5A3 04/14/11 5A2 03/21/11 5A3 09/17/10 5A2 01/02/08 -- 07/11/07 5A3 08/07/06 1R3 07/17/06 5A3 07/15/05 5A2 01/27/05 The Summary Analysis section reflects information in D&B's file as of October 13, 2014. RISK SCORE ANALYSIS SER COMMENTARY: - Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported. - Financial ratios. - Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry. PROBABILITY OF CEASED OPERATIONS/BECOMING INACTIVE SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK RATING: 1 The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S. businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 months. Probability of Supplier Ceased 1.3% (130 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive: Percentage of US business with same SER 13% (1,300 PER 10,000) score: Average Probability of Supplier Ceased 5.60% (560 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive: -Average of Businesses in D&B's Supplier Database CREDIT DELINQUENCY SCORE: 485 DIVERSITY Minority-Owned Business: N/A Historically Underutilized Business: N/A Women-Owned Business: N/A Veteran-Owned Business: N/A https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 72 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional kcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 3 of 13 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: N/A Vietnam Veteran Business: N/A Small Disadvantaged Business: N/A Disabled-Owned Business: N/A HUB-Zoned Certified Business: N/A Historical College Classification: N/A SBA 8(a)Certified: N/A Labor surplus area: YES (2014) Small Business: N/A SPECIAL EVENTS 09/12/2014 STOCK/BOND ISSUANCE/REDEMPTION/REPURCHASE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced its intention to offer,subject to market and other conditions, US$1.6 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior notes maturing in 2022 and 2024. 08/06/2014 EARNINGS UPDATE:According to published reports, comparative operating results for the 9 months ended June 30, 2014: Revenue of$6,074,408,000, Net Income of$164,969,000; compared to Revenue of$5,794,254,000, Net Income of$168,129,000 for the comparable period in the prior year. 07/30/2014 MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,Aecom Technology Corp., DUNS 153561212, (Los Angeles, CA)announced that it has acquired Hunt Construction Group, DUNS 006938179, (Scottsdale,AZ). 07/25/2014 The Chief Executive Officer is now MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES-CEO. 07/17/2014 MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation, DUNS 153561212, (Los Angeles,CA)announced that it has taken over CE International Consultants SL,for an undisclosed price. 07/14/2014 ANNOUNCED MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,Aecom Technology Corp., DUNS 153561212, (Los Angeles, CA)announced that it is buying URS Corp., DUNS 043271568, (San Francisco, CA)for$4 billion in cash and stock,or about$56.31 per URS share. 06/19/2014 BOARD OF DIRECTORS UPDATE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that Clarence T. Schmitz has joined its Board of Directors. 05/21/2014 OFFICER CHANGE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that it has appointed Rick Heinick as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. 01/17/2014 GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that it has been awarded an approximately US$13-million consultancy contract for the design and an estimated US$103-million contract for the construction supervision of the Tseung Kwan 0 Lam Tin(TKO-LT)Tunnel project in Hong Kong.The TKO-LT Tunnel will include a 2.6-mile,two-lane highway connecting Tseung Kwan 0(TKO)at Po Shun Road in the east with the proposed Trunk Road T2 in Kai Tak Development in the west. 01/13/2014 ANNOUNCED CHIEF EXECUTIVE CHANGE:According to published reports on December 12, 2013,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that its Board of Directors has elected AECOM President Michael S Burke to succeed John M Dionisio as CEO, as part of a planned succession process. Dionisio will become Executive CHB when Burke succeeds him as CEO,and joins AECOM's Board of Directors on March 6, 2014. CUSTOMER SERVICE If you have questions about this report, please call our Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 tC,from anywhere within the U.S. If you are outside the U.S. contact your local D&B office. ***Additional Decision Support Available*** Additional D&B products, monitoring services and specialized investigations are available to help you evaluate this https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Profess anal Architectural and Engineering Services 73 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 4 of 13 company or its industry. Call Dun&Bradstreet's Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 to from anywhere within the U.S. or visit our website at www.dnb.com. HISTORY The following information was reported 08/21/2014: Officer(s): MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES-CEO JOHN M. DIONISIO,CHB JANE A CHMIELINSKI,COO STEPHEN M KADENACY,CFO RICK HEINICK, EVP-CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER DIRECTOR(S): The officers identified by(+)and Francis S Y Bong,James H Fordyce, S Malcolm Gillis, Linda Griego, David W Joos, Richard G Newman,William G Ouchi, Robert J Routs, William P Rutledge, Daniel R.Tishman and Clarence T. Schmitz. The Delaware Secretary of State's business registrations file showed that AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION was registered as a Corporation on January 31, 1980. Business started 1980. The company started its operations in 1980 as Ashland Technology Company,a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ashland, Inc. and later on April 6, 1990, an ESOP was formed for the employees of the company to purchased 58%of the capital stock of Ashland Technology Corp from Ashland Oil Inc.Ashland Oil Inc retained a 42%interest in the capital stock. Subsequent sale of common stock to management and employees later eliminated Ashland Oil's stake in the business. On April 6, 1990,AECOM evolved to an independent firm formed by the merger of five Ashland entities. Since then, more than 30 companies have joined AECOM and in 2007,the company became a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange. The company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol"ACM".As of November 7, 2013,there were 1,850 stockholders of record.As of January 6, 2014,the most recent date available,those shareholders identified by the company as beneficially owning 5%or more of the outstanding shares were: FMR LLC (16.60%); Bank of America Merrill Lynch(7.80%); BlackRock, Inc. (5.74%)and The Vanguard Group(5.50%). As of the same date, officers and directors as a group beneficially owned 3.77%of the outstanding shares. RECENT EVENT: On August 21, 2014, Brendan Ranson-Walsh,Vice President of Communications, Construction Services of Aecom, stated that Aecom Technology Corp., Los Angeles,CA,through its wholly owned subsidiary,AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, has acquired The Hunt Corporation, Scottsdale,AZ,on July 29, 2014. With the acquisition,The Hunt Corporation will now operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The Hunt Corporation is the parent company of Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Scottsdale,AZ.Terms were undisclosed. On July 25, 2014, sources stated that AECOM Technology Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, has announced that ACE International Consultants S.L., Madrid, Spain, has joined its international development business,on July 10, 2014. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Further details are unavailable. MICHAEL S BURKE. He has served as the company's President since October 2011. He previously served as CFO from December 2006 to September 2011 and Executive Vice President from May 2006 to December 2006. He also served as Chief Corporate Officer from May 2006 to January 2009. He joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy in October 2005. From 1990 to 2005, he was with the accounting firm KPMG LLP. He served in various senior leadership positions, most recently as a Western Area Managing Partner from 2002 to 2005. JOHN M. DIONISIO. Was appointed CHB in October 2011 and has served as CEO since October 2005. He previously served as President from October 2005 to September 2011 and was elected to the Board of Directors in December 2005. From October 2003 to October 2005, he served as Executive Vice President and COO. JANE A CHMIELINSKI. She has served as the company's COO since October 2011. She previously served as Executive Vice President, Chief Corporate Officer from January 2009 to September 2011. She also served as Group Chief Executive for Corporate Development from January 2008 to January 2009, after serving as President and COO of DMJM+Harris operation since October 2005. STEPHEN M KADENACY. He was appointed CFO in October 2011. He previously served as Senior Vice President, https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 74 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ' Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 5 of 13 • Corporate Finance from May 2008 to September 2011. Prior to joining the company, he was with the accounting firm , KPMG LLP since 1996. RICK HEINICK.Joins AECOM from Bausch+ Lomb, where he served as CHRO and head of transformation. ( OPERATIONS • • 08/21/2014 Description: The Company provides professional technical and management support services. It provides planning, consulting,architectural and engineering design and program and construction management services for a broad range of projects, including highways,airports, bridges, mass transit systems, government and commercial buildings, water and wastewater facilities and power transmission and distribution. It . also provides program and facilities management and maintenance, training, logistics,security and other support services, primarily for agencies of the US government. • Terms are Net,:30 days. Sells to commercial concerns and government entities.Territory : `International: • Season peaks July 1 to Sep 30. Business slow Oct 1.to Dec 31. Employees: 45,500 which includes officer(s).400 employed here. Facilities: Leases 64,000 sq. ft. in a building. Location: Central business section on main street. • • Branches: This business has multiple branches, detailed branch information is available in D&B's linkage or family tree products. Subsidiaries:This business has multiple subsidiaries,detailed subsidiary information is available in D&B's linkage or family tree products. FAMILY LINKAGE • • This business is at the head of its corporate family tree. It is not a subsidiary of any other business. .. UNSPSC UNSPSC(United Nations Standard Product and Services Code) is a globally accepted commodity(Product and Services)classification system:AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION offers the following product(s) and service(s): 81100000 Professional engineering services 81101508 Architectural engineering NAICS • Beginning in 1997, the Standard Industrial Classification(SIC)was replaced by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).This six digit code is a major revision that not only provides for newer industries, but also reorganizes the categories on a production/process-oriented basis.This new, uniform, industry-wide classification system has been designed as the index for statistical reporting of all economic activities of the U.S., Canada,and Mexico. 541330 Engineering Services 541310 Architectural Services SIC Based on information in our file, D&B has assigned this company an extended 8-digit SIC. D&B's use of 8-digit SICs - enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than if we use the standard 4-digit code. • https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM ' CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 75 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 6 of 13 87110000 . Engineering services 87120101 Architectural engineering D&B PAYDEX The D&B PAYDEX is a unique,dollar weighted indicator of payment performance based on up to 182 payment experiences as reported to D&B by trade references. - 3-Month D&B PAYDEX: 69 • D&B PAYDEX: 70 When weighted by dollar amount, payments to When weighted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 16 days beyond terms: suppliers average 15 days beyond terms. o too 0 100 120 days stow 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates 120 days slow ,30 days slow Prompt Anticipates Based on trade collected over last 3 months. Based on up to 24 months of trade. When dollar amounts are not considered,then approximately 79%of the company's payments are within terms. • PAYMENT.SUMMARY ' The Payment.Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report. . Below is an overview of the company's dollar-weighted payments,segmented by its suppliers' primary industries: . Total Total Dollar Largest High I Within Days Slow Rcv'd Amts Credit Terms <31 31-60 61-90 90> (#) (s) (5) . I (%) ; (%) Top industries: Public finance • , 12 63,750 30,000 100 - - - - Misc business service 9 108,250 40,000; 98 2 Misc equipment re ntal 6 I 1,409,500 700,000. 100 - - - Mfg computers 6 1,155,000 700,000-' 50', 9 41 • - - Security broker/deal 4 500,150 500,000 100 - - Misc business credit 4 . 600,500 300,000 100 - - - - Whol computers/softwr 3 402,500 300,000 25 .- 74 - 1 Short-trm busn'credit 3 80,050 55,0001 66 34 - - . - Help supply service 2 202,500 200,000 - 1 - - 99 Radiotelephone commun @ 1. . 100,000 100,000 1 100 -, - - - OTHER INDUSTRIES 82 322,450 35,000, 71 9 5 . - 15 Other payment categories: Cash experiences 471 7,550 1,000 I Payment record unknown 2 2,000,500 2,000,000 • • Unfavorable.comments 1 1,000 1,000 S Placed for collections: With D&B 0 f 0 • Other 01 N/A Total in D&B's file 182 6,953,700 2,000,000 The highest Now Owes on file is$2,000,000 The highest Past Due on file is$300,000 S https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 76 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D'&B,Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION . _ : Page 7 of 13 Dun.81.Bradstreet has 182 payment experiences in its file for this company. For your convenience,we have displayed .80 representative experiences'in the',PAYMENTS section - - PAYMENT DETAILS-- _ ' - Detailed payment history , ' . 'Date Reported Paying Record High Credit I Now Owes E Past Due I Selling Terms Last Sale --- • (mm/yy), (5)' :. I' ' (5) " I (5) I Within - ! .. .}: -_ (months) 10/14: Ppt .f.. 200,000 • 0 1 0 a 6-12 mos .. , Ppt 100,000 0, .0 1 •• '6-12 mos Ppt -• 7,500 1,000' Lease Agreemnt - Ppt ' 1,000, 250- Lease Agreemnt .' - _ - Ppt 750 250 Lease Agreemnt _ • .. Slow 120 2',500 ,2,500 1 2,500 -• _09/14 :Ppt 1. - • 500 0 - 1-mo • Ppt- , 700';000 • 100,000 0 Lease Agreemnt ;•1"mo Ppt ,000 0 , N30" ' _.1 mo- � pt �• • `100,000 5 . Ppt - 10,000 0,1-- 0' '6-12 mos ,• Ppt 2,500 0 '0 , -4-5 mos mos - .. .:� _ Ppt 2,500 01. 0 „2-3 ,Ppt - ..2,500 • 0. - - 0 4-5 mos - . Ppt. 1,000 • Ppt _ . -. 500; 250 0 1 mo. Ppt, • _ 250 100., ' _0 1 mo• • Ppt - - 250 0- - 0, • N30 1 mo . 'Ppt- 250' 0 0 1 N30 - 6-12 mos P , • `Ppt - 250 0 :.0 - - 4-5 mos , Ppt • - 250 50 0 4-5 mos . •.Ppt ..: - D&B Supplier Qualifier Report.AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION -Page 8 of 13 . _ , Slow 30-60 1 250 . 250 .Slow 100 I 200,000 100,000 60,000` - - _ 1 mo Slow 120+ 500 500- - - 500 - • . - I-.(044) • 0 0 0 Cash account , 6712 mos•- , . 08/14 Ppt 35;000 0 0 _ ;2-3 mos - Ppt 20,000 20,000 0 _- 1 rnp, :, . Ppt • 15,000 0 -0, 4-5„mos Ppt, ' .• ' , 15,000. • 15,000 ' . 0 , - • -1 mo - Ppt• - • 15,000 . 7,500 0 .' , .1-mo . Ppt - 2;500 . 2,500 0 1.mo' . .. 1 Ppt 750 1. 100 ,0 6-12 mos•. - ' - - Ppt 750 0 • 0 _, • •.:.6-12 mos Ppt - 500 0 • —0 • _ - 6-12 mos . ' ,- - . Ppt •-250 0 , 6-12 mos Ppt 1 50;, 50 • 0 - 1 mo _ Ppt 50' 0 -0 . • 6=12 mos - Ppt' 0 0 - 0 6-12 mos - Ppt , 0 0 0 6=12 mos Ppt - , • 0 - 0 •- 0 - 6=12 mos • - a Ppt 0- 0 0 ; - -6-.12 mos . Slow 20 250 0 0 N30. 4-5 mos - 07/14 . •(062) 100 Cash account 1 mo' A A Cash own option. :-06/14 Ppt •. - 5,000 0 0' 16-12‘mos • , Ppt-Slow 30 -, 5;000!. 2,500 1,000 ' .1 mo - 05/14 Ppt : .. -2,500 0 '0 - 6-12 mosj.•• . Ppt - - 50.1 1 _ 1.mo - _ 50. 1 tmo Ppt -. - Ppt 50 - 1 mo N- Ppt - •50 1 mo - 04/14 Ppt,; • ` 50, ,:1 mo 02/14- Ppt: 5;000 5,000 -0 Lease Agreemnt = : "1 mo' - 01/14 Ppt ;50 - 0 0 _ 6-12 mos ; (073)•. 1,000 1,0001 1,000 - A A,Unsatisfactory.. = 12/13. Ppt 1:,000- 0 I - .0 N90 '2-3 mos Ppt 250 is mo Ppt - 250 Ppt. - 50 0 - 0 •. , . 6-12.mos . Slow 30-60 750 500 500 .N30 09/13 . Ppt 25,000 - .- 0 0 • ' 6-12 mos . .09/12 - Ppt-Slow 30 55,000 •- 0 i 0 _ 2-3 mos• • Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond ' terms'can be the result of disputes'over merchandise,skipped invoices etc. - - Each experience shown • . is from.,a separate-supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. PAYMENT TRENDS • . - SUPPLIER VERSUS INDUSTRY PAYDEX - . -> PRYOR 4 QTRSi CURRENT 12 MONTH TREND https://www suppli,emskmanager.com%Cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... , 10/16/2014 . - ,, 78 • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 9 of 13 I2012 2013 --- I--- 1 20141--- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- DEC MAR JUN:SEP NOV DEC'JAN FEB MAR;APR! MAY JUN JUL AUG! SEP OCT Supplier 75 72 74 174. 78 78 t 78 78 77 i-76 '77 78 76 76 78 70 PAYDEX f f i Industry PAYDEX(Based on 46 establishments in SIC 8711) UP QRTI 80 80 80 180 '80 80 i 180 180 MEDIAN 78 78 ,79 178 178 78 78 I 79 LO QRT1 73_ 73 74. 174 I 173 73 72 . 73 - PAYDEX scores are updated daily and are based on upto 13 months of trade experiences from the Dun&Bradstreet trade file. All amounts displayed within this report are in local currency. STATEMENT UPDATE • 08/07/2014 Interim Consolidated statement dated JUN 30 2014: • • Assets Liabilities • Cash. . . - . 510,147,000 Accts Pay • 704,981,000 Accts Rec - 2,431,517,000 Short-Term Debt 27,922,000 Prepaid Exps&Other Current 150,842,000 L.T. Liab-(1yr) . .38,540,000 • Assets Income Taxes Receivable 9,355,000 Accrued Exps&Other Current .Liabs 930,693,000 Deferred.Tax Assets-Net -. 19,949,000 Billings In Excess Of Costs • 351,724,000 Curr Assets ' 3,121,810,000 Curr Liabs 2,053,860,000 • Fixt&Equip 278,780,000 Long-Term Debt . 976,963,000 Deferred Tax Assets-Net 117,090,000 L.T. Liab-Other 439,446,000 Investments-Other .. 133,766,000 COMMON STOCK 964,000 Goodwill 1,896,371,000 ADDIT. PD.-IN CAP 1,848,344,000 Intangible Assets-Net 86,717,000 ACCUM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (264,951,000) LOSS Other Assets 119,208,000 RETAINED EARNINGS 613,155,000 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS - 85,961,000 Total Assets 5,753,742,000 Total 5,753,742,000 From OCT 01 2013 to JUN 30 2014 sales$5,794,254,000; cost of goods sold $5,520,109,000. Gross profit $274,145,000; operating expenses$23,783,000. Operating income$250,362,000; other income$856,000; other expenses$33,023,000; net income before taxes$218,195,000; Federal income tax$52,367,000; net income . $165,828,000. - . Statement obtained-from Securities And Exchange Commission. Prepared from books without audit. Accounts receivable shown net less$72,300,000 allowance. Explanations. The net worth of this company includes intangibles. • • FINANCE • • 01/13/2014 Three-year statement comparative: . • l https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 79 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 10 of 13 i Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated Sep 30 2011 Sep 30 2012 Sep 30 2013 Current Assets 2,990,066,000 3,147,293,000 3,131,602,000 Current Liabs 1,814,446,000 2,078,402,000 2,053,549,000 Current Ratio 1.65 1.51 1.52 Working Capital 1,175,620,000 1,068,891,000 1,078,053,000 Other Assets 2,799,262,000 2,517,275,000 2,534,021,000 Net Worth 2,395,137,000 2,224,488,000 2,074,094,000 Sales 8,037,374,000 8,218,180,000 8,153,495,000 Long Term Liab 1,579,745,000 1,361,678,000 1,537,980,000 Net Profit(Loss) 284,090,000 (56,933,000) 243,196,000 Fiscal Consolidated statement dated SEP 30 2013: Assets Liabilities Cash 600,677,000 Accts Pay 725,389,000 Accts Rec 2,342,262,000 Short-Term Debt 29,578,000 Prepaid Exps&Other Current 168,714,000 Taxes 6,127,000 Assets Deferred Tax Assets-Net 19,949,000 L.T. Liab-(1yr) 54,687,000 Accrued Exps&Other Current 915,282,000 Liabs Billings In Excess Of Costs 322,486,000 Curr Assets 3,131,602,000 Curr Liabs 2,053,549,000 Fixt&Equip 270,672,000 Long-Term Debt 1,089,060,000 Deferred Tax Assets-Net 143,478,000 L.T. Liab-Other 448,920,000 Investments-Other 80,045,000 COMMON STOCK 960,000 Goodwill 1,811,754,000 ADDIT. PD.-IN CAP 1,809,627,000 Intangible Assets-Net 83,149,000 ACCUM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (261,299,000) LOSS Other Assets 144,923,000 RETAINED EARNINGS 472,155,000 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS 52,651,000 Total Assets 5,665,623,000 Total 5,665,623,000 From OCT 01 2012 to SEP 30 2013 annual sales$8,153,495,000; cost of goods sold$7,703,507,000. Gross profit $449,988,000; operating expenses$72,999,000. Operating income$376,989,000; other income$3,522,000; other expenses$44,737,000; net income before taxes$335,774,000; Federal income tax$92,578,000. Net income $243,196,000. Statement obtained from Securities And Exchange Commission. Prepared from statement(s)by Accountant: Ernst& Young LLP, Los Angeles,California. ACCOUNTANT'S OPINION A review'of the accountant's opinion indicated that the financial statement meets generally accepted accounting principles and the audit contains no qualifications. Explanations The net worth of this company includes intangibles. The report was updated using information the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. KEY BUSINESS RATIOS Statement date: SEP 30 2013 Based on this number of establishments: 46 https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 80 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Prnfessionat Architectu rat and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 11 of 13 Firm _ Industry Median Quartile Rank (Supplier) Return of Sales: _ 3.0 Return of Sales: 2.2 2 Current Ratio: 1.5 Current Ratio: 1.6 3 Quick Ratio: 1.4 Quick Ratio: 1.2 2 Assets/Sales: 69.5 Assets/Sales: 56.1 3 Total Liability/Net Worth: 173.2 Total Liability/ Net Worth: 128.4 3 PUBLIC FILINGS The following Public Filing data is for information purposes only and is not the official record. Certified copies can only be obtained from the official source. LIENS A lienholder can file the same lien in more than one filing location.The appearance of multiple liens filed by the same lienholder against a debtor may be indicative of such an occurrence. Amount: $1,637 Status: Open CASE NO.: 14-0462039 Type: County Tax Filed by: .TAX COLLECTOR Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY(A CORP), GLEN ALLEN,VA Where filed: LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS, NORWALK,CA • Date status attained: 05/05/2014 Date filed: 05/05/2014 Latest Info Received: 05/28/2014 . Amount: $191 Status: Open . CASE NO.: 130489722 Type: County Tax Filed by: TAX COLLECTOR Against: .AECOM TECHNOLOGY,ONTARIO, CA Where filed: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, SAN BERNARDINO, CA Date status attained: 11/14/2013 Date filed: 11/14/2013 Latest Info Received: 12/16/2013 Amount: $79 Status: Open CASE NO.: 13-1577743 Type: County Tax Filed by: TAX COLLECTOR Against: ,AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP, ENCINO, CA Where filed: • • LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS, NORWALK,CA Date status attained: 11/06/2013 Date filed: 11/06/2013 Latest Info Received: 12/02/2013 Amount: $4,810 Status: Open FILING NO.: 20130627000093 . . Type: State Tax Filed by: STATE OF NEVADA Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,GLEN ALLEN,VA Where filed: CLARK COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, LAS VEGAS, NV • https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 • AECOM • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 81 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 12 of 13 Date status attained: 06/27/2013 Date filed: 06/27/2013 Latest Info Received: 07/12/2013 Amount: $4,810 Status: Open CASE NO.: 4251677 Type: State Tax Filed by: STATE OF NEVADA • Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.,GLEN ALLEN,VA Where filed: WASHOE COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, RENO, NV Date status attained: 06/19/2013 Date filed: 06/19/2013 Latest Info Received: 07/26/2013 UCC FILINGS Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds Type: Original Sec. party: MACQUARIE EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC., BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2013 1278523 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: 04/03/2013 Latest Info Received: 04/30/2013 Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds-Chattel paper and proceeds Type: Original Sec.party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION, SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2009 2654165 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: 08/18/2009 Latest Info Received: 09/21/2009 Type: Continuation Sec. party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION, SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2014 2965515 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: - 07/25/2014 Latest Info Received: 09/23/2014 Original UCC filed date: 08/18/2009 Original filing no.: 2009 2654165 Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds-Chattel paper and proceeds Type: Original Sec.party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION, SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2008 2598769 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: 07/29/2008 Latest Info Received: 08/27/2008 Type: Continuation Sec. party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION, SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2013 2884618 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 82 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ' Professional Arcnitectu rat and Engineering Se-vices AECOM =1 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report:'_AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION % - -Page'13 of 13 • • Date filed 07/25/2013 Latest Info Received: ',09/24/2013 - Original.UCC filed date: 07/29/2008 . , Original.filing no = 2008 2598769 .i- .."'- ''2.'1- :"---‘''' There.are additional UC'C,s in D&B s file:on this`.company available by contacting,1 800-234-3867. . ': The public record items contained in-this:report may-have been paid,terminated, vacated or released prior to•the date this.report was printed_ GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY-,„ r Activity summary _ - . -- --'.Borrower.(Dir/Guar) NO ' Administrative"debt: r . - NO . "Contractor -, YES Grantee NO !' :Party;excluded'from-federalprogram(s). - NO - Congressional District` 40 k The details provided in_the-Goveernment.Activity section are as reported to Dun &Bradstreet by the federal i r. ' ment and other sources _ 4 &Bradtret •Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscrber 263159923 Copyright 201Dun , - • • • ''-::-''''''. https//www supplierriskmanage'r com/c-p/getLiveReport?orgld=160548481&dunsNumbe.. 10/16/2014 AECOM r. > CITY OF MIAMI BEACH:I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 83 i " , ,''_.Aecom Technical Services;Inc. ' Last:Updated:13-Oct-2014 Company Overview D-U-N-S Number: 00-318-4462, -Country::-._ntry .USA :} `"' Primnt Name: Aecoin Technical Services,Inc, Phone:. = 213 593 8000; x Alternate Names: AECOM ' , - ■Web Site -, - tvww aecom com,• I CAGE'cades: 4L767 --Con sessional District: + 34 ;'I.' - ,• , . Add ress: `.515 S Flower St Fl 4,L'os,Angeles,CA,90071,USA 'Location: Headquarters Predictive Scores&Ratings ,• Supplier Overview r . ! Suppli Base'dlember No:. -, - SER Supplier IDs r, Not Available Data Depth^ , , . i• _ i . --- --- ----,-..—,, " FSS Percentile 'i- ___ -1 _ Global P'irent aF1OVi TFCHNOI Of:Y CORPORATION PerfoimanceRating ****'t �. i SS 17 ''� Scorecard Risk• ' Not Available -, =. 2 L ist;Ulidatc.lU 13 2U14 SIC Codes _-+ ' . - 8740400=Industry specialist consultants ?8711-Engineering services . " . 87489905 Environmental consultant ' 4953 Refusesystems' • UNSPSC Codes 1'_ :••` '76120000,'Refuse disposrl'and treatment �y - NAICS Codes - 562219 Other:Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal ., 'CAG E Codes 4L767 • ConaresssionaI District 3�, Supplier Diversity WO NI No VET No • VVT Na • SBA No ' '' SDB No [_ b11N Class No SSI And SER _ Paydex and Performance Rating' .551 •SER • - 41Paydex 4Per1orrnaoce Rating '- . 0 _ ----- -- -- i '.LGO '-- -- - 5 • _ S •to _ _ ._ - -'.--�--- ,• - 1-' W133. t NafIS bUy'21 1,14 1eC•ta I rl1 Mtf10 :441/•19 R4:,5 _F �Se,l ' • 84 CITY'OFMIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Architectural and EngineeringServices '' -- AECOM• • • • • t Financial`and Legal Indicators- Government Indicators . Disaster UFF Indicator Value Family;: SER Commentary: • 9 5 Variable Paydex over last 12 months -Limited time under present management control -Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported -Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry -Proportion of past due balances to total amount owing -Evidence of open liens,and judgments • Paydex SIIMI Description: 0 50 100 The D&B payment score(Paydex)is a score that assesses the historical payment performance of a business.The score corresponds to an average number of days beyond terms or within terms and is based on all the trade experiences associated with this business in D&B's database.More specifically.the Paydex is a dollar-weighted average of a company's combined individual payment experiences and ranges from 0-100.with higher scores representing businesses that pay their bills more promptly.In most cases.at least three trade experiences are required for the Paydex to be calculated. FSS Percentile 11111111111111•111 Commentary: 0 50 100 -Denotes a condition where fewer current payments by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where slower payments by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where public filings for the subject business have been provided to state regulatory bodies on a secured loan. -Denotes a condition where slower high payments(e.g..in U.S.high US Dollar payments;in U.K..high Great Britain Pound payments)by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where the subject business may be seeking various lines of creditor applying to several institutions for a line of credit. } FSS Class Commentary: 5 3 1 The Financial Stress Score predicts the likelihood of a firm experiencing financial stress over the next 12 months.D&B defines a financially stressed company as one that obtains legal relief from its creditors.ceases business operations without paying all its creditors in full,voluntarily withdraws from business operations and leaves unpaid obligations,goes into recievership or reorganization,or makes an arrangement for the beniftt of creditors over the next 12 month period.based on the information in D&B's commercial database _ --- CCS Class -- ---—-__. Description: • 5 3 1 The Commercial Credit Score(CCS)predicts the likelihood of a business paying its bills in a severely delinquent manner(91 days or more past terms). obtaining legal relief from its creditors or ceasing operations without paying all creditors in full over the next 12 months.D&B defines severe delinquency as a business with at least 10%of its payments 91 days or more past due,based on the information in D&B's commercial database.A Commercial Credit Risk Class of 1-5 is a segmentation of the scoreable universe into five distinct groups where a one(I)represents businesses that have the lowest probability of delinquency.and five(5)represents businesses with the highest probability of delinquency.This Class enables a customer to quickly segment their new and existing accounts into various risk segments to determine appropriate marketing or credit policies.Note:Commercial Credit Scores are not calculated for those businesses designated as"Discontinued at This Location","Open Bankruptcy",or"Higher Risk".These records are automatically assigned a score of zero(0). 1t CCS Percentile Commentary: 0 50 100 The Commercial Credit Score Percentile is a 1-100 reanking where a percentile of I has highest probability of delinquency and a percentile of 100 has the lowest probability of deliquency. D&B Rating Commentary: The D&B Rating helps you to quickly assess a company's size and composite credit appraisal.lt is based on information in the company's interim or fiscal balance sheet and an evaluation of its credit worthiness. Scorecard Risk Not Available Description: The risk class for this entity(supplier)is calculated in the primary scorecard.Possible values for the risk class are"Acceptable"."Moderate",or"Severe".For more scorecard detail for a supplier.click on the "Scorecard"tab at the left hand side of the supplier profile page. Viability Rating Not Available — — Performance Rating Global performance Internal performance 4953-Refuse systems 4953-Refuse systems I � 86 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Enginee,ing Services AECOM • -Category - = Internal Global gam' ;s —_ _•• o ` ! 78 RELIBIY • HOR'reliably do you thiul.this compact'follows through on its - eth utiitments^• -•COST o. 74 Hou closely did your final total costs correspontl',to youre'pectations nt : - I 1 ---' the beginning of the transaction:' - +• • • — — -"I:1-. „--, -l----. (__V I ORDER ACCURACY 0 81< • Ho‘,.\yell do you think the protluctlse-sae••delivered mpichcd yotir j•• order specifcalibns and quanlit:' - I- 4 DELIVERY/TIMELINESS o 75 1 Hoti satisfied do you feel about the timeliness of the produc4r ervico i deli ycry? QUALITY —,o X74- i Hou°satisfied do you'fctl•tbout.the quality of'the product/service .' L. ' pot idol be•it comp tit :. --. • 1 BUSINESS RELATIONS 0 69 ' I How easy do you think this company is to do business itcth ' . PERSONNEL o 66 ' Hots.satisfied do you feel about the attitude.courtesy and 4: '_ •pcofessionahsmoflhiseontpattysstaff? rl•� ' CUSTOMER SUPPORT i 72 ' Mott satisfied do t on feel about the customer support you leeched front •- This compan■ — — RESPONSIVENESS 0 67 l H01.1 responsive do}ou drink this company.,vas,to information requests. - issues.or problems that arose in the coursrof,thc transaction? ' 1 Top Competitors:, . . Data Not Available • - • • • • AECOM. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services . .., . ' - .- — . 3 :, 87' .. • • 1 , �. . Vie' •<- • ["••:•::2 ; .' • : s ? • _ • . .,__.. -• • , ---`------ --'. - '-,'..., --_,.,- .. , ...,. :070''''\' . . -- — - -.----k"'.:.1...)•,...•.-1,.,i , . :,),„,,; Flfr ::. /:,..:‘,„:„ ..,„ ., -,:-.......,_ .__,... • - N, .-, . ..-• ,..4 ,, X'..'1'V' . C" '--'-":-‘1'.../.. ."'. ":■Z7:\N\"\\`----' '••---.".. - -1 .4`..." ,•;*'......:1':.* '''' -.'.." ' ;.'„4-‘,.,,,,.. 4 s '''' • 7,,-4, - , 1.-.,,A.,. \, ' ,"•--..--,.....„: --- ,,,--;--,..,',4.,, -.... . . •'...''-'''''--••• ' - 7.7-.3'-',,,,--.,-_,._ ,f4.^......-:-'),"",\ • '.,',:-* -_,',-2",, -- ' ' ''',/•■4.-' „,'- ',,°, '!. ''.r.r-=-----;'.._ ;',,V,ON- X)::::-.."..-.;_ \ --•.--/ '--''' \ v•,.. ...,7,:-.,....,„:.:47,...... ..„•\,„,..,.7....,,,..,„..„...„,_ . .„._ _,..., , _ .iott -4410,140.9111 -1. - ,t • -.....-\_,...........,1:-.„ , , _, _... l'.*.-'\•,lt ' . • • --- -.*.1--- ._. a ., _ ' — s'i i, t'it-•\- ---.-"LT- 1 „.. , ' - 1- L.,. ', ' 1 .--•-: '''..:-- -.r, . •.- - -"-.1 .... . . .. • '--/ r•... •.--,_ : - -' _ -- -7-.7--- . „,••-. .,...,..:tie 4 -- ..-";--:':' f.• V./-__ - • - -1-''",'''‘i. - -',.•",, ,A....,.,_- -'''' • . - , imp 7 •'•-", - - .. ' :--- .. ___-- .'.-----1' - -._ -N .----;`--,70..- *It ,„.. .,..• ',,!'.,'-'3., ''' .-'-. /------; .- 7------.:::. -•'-' , —--‘- ,--_ • '-'' • , -- • '•--- • --- '. -- '--,4-- '741V c .• •,:„ tl..„ ( ;;.,..-,---.--,-_-:,;-..... ., , . .•---___- ,..\-;,A , ,aor „t; , =7.,,i ..-- - - ..:-. - k...,,-,v. _..,___ ,....4). ..,,... 4 •. ,., ,,..„......., , .. . , ,..,,,,,.•• ....„.,,, . _...- ., ...,.. .1 ''‘'Z'''",:h42--7‘‘„ ,..,:-.„,s' .,0.•,..,_.... .-',,,-,‘Ti, ;,' l'i-00,,„,___,..,_ -. ',.-• -‘.- ..-- --. . is ' '• `,:"-,,,-v.. --";.‘'`' ‘ :'.,-. . • 2 ?‘:,•,, -,...... .. .• - •.,,...„,:,..A, .0.,,,,...,„.,..; • ., A•,-,-,..• -. .„ -`......*N, , ,.: .1.10 ,'.\,:-_ , ' 2.'''':**.Z...-:---. .,,-.-/:9-1;7, . ,,, ,d; , . . \ -:L.'. 1,:,'''-,:kik: '".'';-,:,,,,..! •.: ,' ...?q,,,,.• itali„ - - '•- %-.\,..-,,,•;.,,,-,,,....;, -,i,:: „..---, ..- , y/ ..„-,....' .`2.., . \4.,\;,A,-.N.\\.\N.,;-,--.... - ./7, .. . . . Approach & .. ,• , ,,,, , . ” , .. .N. '..-10f/..7, -.N. . . ..,4 .\.... f 4- • II," ,.,. 's's,,,, ':,' •.:....e>..' ,NN .-i:,:i1_,--\,..._._ r , 0. .. mt. .„.. ,,: , '441. .I.,,,Wi : v',.',.•, 2' mei/ ,. ,,,,!,,I. %,„ .1 '11 -,,,:-..:-.-•--_''..-,4i 1•,.• . . e■ . , . .. ' --, ,, LI ti\ •,t, ,, .-7--,-.,,,..__,.,',,,..-..!.-. _. , --• . , - • . .• t,.....*:‘ m.o.. ,,,,, A ' ,1 '4,'' ' •.. -, _--_, , , .• ..' L, ,,i, ■ k ,, -,,\-,,n111 lot ta 7,77- s',I,,.; x..,-1.-L, ,I. .‘,,' , ' ,...,,, • ,fr a- .. -‘ , • ,r■! ' A't ..„ .. • ti, ill k.', -. /..— ..,, i a i 1 , ,e, ' i 1,4,, . . , , t s: bt. .. %Z., 'I 1.111111t . , - tAts i- .•.k..,4 j• , " 4 1 i I, .„ •... :lel; ' ,:` 1,-, •.1..... 'L i .„\I, . ,..,,,..\ ‘•‘, ,. -•, ,v '. --...,-,-. .,..:1 . . • • - - .......,.N•‘ ;'' \i', I \t\I‘'..,i"."-.:• 'A, . •• -; ..: ...,- ........, -:',,,t- '!;';i7'' , '•,ik:‘,. - k \■‘'s ' \'--' - '''' ' 1.. fi ‘i .11k\‘' ''f. - .'''''\. ' .. • ..4 '') '. • A ,........-,,,t. , .' ,,, ,..,,.,. \,,...,„...,:.._ ... .- ,,„. ,„„,. ,,,- ,. .,, ..,„,, ... .,.,‘,tf, L,p,.'1.,, ,-.. \, ,.,. , .v-81 •,.., 1 ',...... - k , ', ,'-'4.,' ' , ,-.--,- . .---.• -;: 41,,.•,,,... „ •I .111'. - :; . • -,,•,'' ,-Ilf .."\..s•''(\tl, ,ytc. ,-, . --..1 \ ),.. . = •A 1\I ' 'e••• k. \ b,. ,.., •40 •; ' °4• •••• „. . '..,' "....„7,- _.,.,:.("-_---..,..-.• , . ■ \.,,,■ It. V. '' - -''‘ - • I 1^ , •1/4's, ,‘ ,,,, :' . • \\.......t .._: 4.■; .),.!4,?,,: ., \\ .... "'..' : y e, ,-,... ,.•,-......--• .. • ,,,,,=.. i.,, ,,,1„, „s.,., 4,. i li.\„..,.\ :: ,,'.. ..•--,..:i7r . -.,'. ir,.-. , . -- .. , Iti,,----. •. ,--iy-.#, ..,.,.. ; ......,,.„...„„....L. .!.,,,,... / ,L.. ... ...... „ ., -,,,,, . . . ......,.. . . Af,St.‘,. , - .., ..,..,, .:. ., - .' ,,V.,...? -IA'', ' • .,-- • i'' -', 1-",--1,, ' :5•'./- , -,. •, , 1, \ Sh;,.....,..• ......,,,.. A...,4 ..!'.. .t 4:. ..., ., ...7 '; 1 ,,:t.',, -,' . ', ,‘,+1,•.,' '\-,,c,,,.?'' --,-1.. ' 11117,:. , ,.. c.::■:".'744;'.e.r.r'll'1...,.'1:::„.:‘......71:4'lik.' '.\T:'1/'.47:111, i --':...4:(",..,*,t;\':4:.*:::7.:,..s..":. . I .. ji r,,,..; • ,70., , .. ...'„:„Ili..,X -97.:. ':. :T.., -1■:k. ' ' ..;(- ' *11..:'-\\- .,• Ae. - • ) :.44,3-. , •" '.1 ‘it,",% -, ,ditt*:),.';. „_ '' ,. • \ •., ,,... , 4 • 2,4 z t - 4„g,... • --.---- -- IV,' -(ti-.-- _,, , -; -_* . . •-.0 Aft: . \f . , i.i i ---. : . , ..),,,..--, •,.... -....74,- -:- ■A 7 1 '"" - • . • -4: ' -;•, , '''''":^"' * . 1- 4,, ' ' 1/44444' 14.. '. • '....; H., .*,.-:'itri ‘:..- :•- ' Tt':".'''''".'.',..1' ..' 1..,,I;:•-".-411::"::: - .11.1-Cilib.:14.* - 1 --- ' .,' ' :•:.- ii,-;., .';',4..;'''' ' v - ''''''•i. AL,••• 4 • - - '1,0 , 4, .,01 -, - • ..., :'1,,,d1 ' A.'"-": 1 . ' '." '• -- tr,,,,„1,-. NM . i:*li-4"., a:I IV; = .a, .-ej , . - - ,-41' • -..salcion-Now,.i '1' -- 116,,,;‘, .-.1 • i' laa1111 .■ .- .... .....%. . .mr,„ •7",..' ay•,.. 4.• . _. --- ” i r. -40•4,-11111•1111111k - ..• . „ .^.irl.... ' 1 ' ••••Iir a . ,vs Ir--...' ' 5,. . r r,.:,-, -._. : ... ,..., • . '-'. ..7 446, •---. • _ .! : , 3-., ..• • . ._ .. .. .... r. mmai„ ALL1.,. . . is • -_ . ‘.1-. ....'''1111t............_ .,-. -- ,..- -: CC.I rf . ,..-7.,-,,- • c...)--`•-•-4--- .--...' ., . -- ,...-- - -a 11' --..,,,,„ ty.,,,L i,?..-'. • .. _ Mit -7.-7, ....„.., ,,,,... ... , •:i..."-,4 -0 til ' - .. . • '4.,4:,.*,„,.., - . .„.. • ,4.„;•,,,,„„rf a) ... , _ ___.... . : • ' - CD • 11,1,.:...,...r,:e„-i.I, ...w . r-r „ , = 0 0 --. --•*"",!'"'.....- .,... ...,-. CM '.<..„. .,-• , . ._, -• ° , •^.----...-,,., ...._ . .. - , __ ____ .. -..... . , .. .. , - ' r?!-'■'' ---,7, • Approach & Vethodology AECOM's Approach/Methodology AECOM's 5D Approach We have a proven approach to Streetscape, park and open space design and implementation, based on our 30+years of experience on public projects similar to projects that will be completed in Miami Beach. Known as we might call it-a"5D"approach,our approach assures a thoughtful,creative solution D E S I R E process that is"grounded"in community input and support throughout the process—right up to its implementation.The basic steps of our"5D"approach Client&User Needs can conveniently and memorably be summarized as:`Desire, Discovery, Design, Discussion,and Documentation.' Depending upon the scope of a project,AECOM will implement this methodology and/or tailor it to meet the challenge of specific projects. Desire During this first step of the process on any given project,we will conduct a Kickoff Meeting with City staff, Public Leadership Group(PLG)members and/or DISCOVERY other key stakeholders(as determined by the City)to establish expectations for the project.Typical review topics includes scope of work, project schedule,lines Research,Analysis, of communications, public involvement, review and approval process, project Comparabtes development program,construction budget, permitting,and bidding process and construction delivery method. We will also discuss community needs as they relate to the proposed `Development Program'of any proposed projects. Our team of park planners and designers will refine the programmatic needs into an imptementable Phase 1 for further public input and evaluation. DESIGN At this early stage we really need to hear what the City and client group desires to see in the eventual design—what needs to change,what needs to remain the Creation,Synthesis same,what needs further investigation.And while we are good listeners and take good notes,we will investigate and query to make sure that what we hear can be made into objectives for the project design process. Discovery During the Discovery step of a project—which may run concurrently with the Desire—the design team reviews site opportunities and constraints including any transportation/access issues,environmental conditions,drainage, utilities, D I S C U S S I O N easements, permitting and other issues that may affect the implementation of the project.A proposed task of the Discovery step may include visits to comparable projects in the region.The purpose of these site visits is to develop Interaction with Client, a common understanding of what stakeholders like and dislike about similar Evaluation,Reflection projects,which further helps us to understand the specific needs and desires of the City that may be illustrated through the design,construction,operation or maintenance of other successful public spaces.The product from the Discovery step will be an Opportunities and Constraints Memorandum,summarizing updated site opportunities and constraints to successfully constructing the site proposed programming. DOCUMENTATION Presentation&Summary AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?ofessioia,Architectural and Engineering Services 91 3. Approach & Methodology, cost,-,e N. '' II ,, •1 •mi.., -1. 4...4% - _ . , , . ..,_ , i --mc. .c.„ ,, . ,,„.., ___. , —. sad-,,... - \ , 3,‘ irlii N t, 0 . g* _ Ltd k i 4'-::;:,: 4.''''' ire ma r Public Engagment Workshop Plans from a Public Engagment Workshop Public Engagement is a key component of Discovery and "Documentation"which is the basis for the next phase of would include workshops and public engagement from a the process. public leadership group and general public through a multi- day workshop with a topic lecture series by the project's Documentation Advisory Team members. The final step of the planning and design process- before permitting,bidding and construction-is the Design Documentation phase.During this step of work we The Design step builds on the findings from the first two develop 30%Schematic Design Documents,60%Design phases,exploring various alternatives for accomplishing Development,Permit Documents and 100%Construction the Development Program on the site.We will begin by Document for the project,based on the final approved reviewing and discussing any conceptual plans or visions. design.The documents include construction plans, developed in advance by the City in the light of our(joint) specifications and cost estimates,which will be submitted discovery effort,and out of those discoveries,in workshop and reviewed according to the project schedule.We have fashion offer alternatives on approach,design,and found it very helpful to assemble the entire design team for expression. From there,developing a consensus on design each of the review meetings to ensure good coordination; development on a continuing basis of consultation and during the Documentation phase of the recently exploration,we will be equipped to refine the concept plan constructed City of Kissimmee Waterfront Park,for into a solidly achievable and executable design. example,the City and design team met monthly to review plans,specifications,product samples,design details, Discussion cost estimates and permit submittals.Depending upon The purpose of the Discussion step is to build final the size and scope of a specific project,this phase can be consensus regarding a preferred direction/concept for abbreviated as necessary to accommodate needs of budget the project development.We will discuss and confirm and schedule. the City's preferred review and approval process at the Kickoff Meeting;our typical approval process includes the Services Rendered &Available Facilities review of alternative concepts and cost estimates with City staff,key stakeholders,general public,and City Council Our Coral Gables office will serve as our local point of as necessary depending upon the size and scope of the contact and will perform the majority of the work project. Effective meeting formats include workshops anticipated under this contract.This office provides and open houses. In developing the right manner in which landscape architecture planning and design services for to take the design ideas forward to the public,depending municipal clients throughout the South Florida area. on the specific project,we must be sensitive to issues of As a supporting role,our Orlando office will provide `design exhaustion'or other concerns having to do with the construction document production assistance and QA/QC length of time a project may have been under consideration services. We will also utilize our Raleigh,North Carolina prior to this phase of work,or the length of time since it has office for park planning services and AECOM specialists been seriously considered in the public forum. The final in Sarasota and Denver,Colorado for water use/irrigation plan and budget approved by the City Council will become needs. It is anticipated that over 90%of all work will be 92 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?-ofessional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 3. Approach & Methodology, performed by AECOM directly,with the balance of the work and flowering trees and shrubbery in 35 acres of deep marl being accomplished by our Arborist sub-consultant. soils as well as 10 acres of containerized plant material. We are teaming with a local Arborist,Mick Gnaegy of Mix'd Their clients include: Florida Power&Light,US Homeland Greens,Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc.who will Security,US Air Force,US Customs&Immigration,Miami- provide arboricultural consulting services on an as-needed Dade Police Training Facility,US Coast Guard,Dade County basis, particularly as it relates to existing trees. Mr. Capital Improvements,BCA,Inc.,Girl Scouts of South Gnaegy will provide evaluations and appraisals that will Florida,Biscayne Point,Castello Hammock,Walmart Super be used as a basis for determining tree disposition during Center(Florida City),Boca Chita Island-Biscayne Nation the design process. Mr.Gnaegy's firm specializes in Park,City of Homestead and Adopt-A-Tree. governmental work and can consult on a wide variety of tree Their services include: Reclamation,Natural Areas related concerns. Management,Landscape Installation,Forestry Services, Land Clearing-Grubbing/Demolition Services,Exotic Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc.in an environmentally Vegetation Removal/Eradication/Remedial Maintenance, conscious full-service nursery dedicated to sustainable Vegetation Debris Removal&Clearing,Canal Cleaning solutions specializing in reclamation and restoration. They Services,Grounds Maintenance Services,Tree Services, are a proven leader in the industry for more than 35 years, Wholesale Native Plant Nursery,Aquatic Plant Services and veteran owned and operated by its founder,Mick Gnaegy. Biology and Hydrology Consulting. Mix'd Greens Environmental opened in 1977 as a start up design landscape installation company expanding into a Current and Near Future Workload wholesale nursery in 1989. The chart below indicates the approximate work load of They proudly service federal and local government each proposed team member as currently estimated. This municipalities and their agencies as well as provide AECOM work force is agile and well positioned to quickly quality plant materials to local and out-of-town landscape and effectively take on additional work to satisfy the needs contractors,architects,plant brokers/shippers and retail of Miami Beach. At any given time team members are firms throughout southern Florida and the Caribbean. available to assume new projects and work assignments Their nursery specializes in Florida and Caribbean Natives. can be shifted accordingly to provide optimum and timely They also maintain a large selection of exotic palms,shade service. TEAM MEMBER CURRENT WORKLOAD Greg Ault 75% Gustavo Santana,MLA 70% Lauren Swan,MLA 70% Michael Brown,RLA 75% Andrew Sheppard,RLA,LEED AP 70% Thomas J.McMacken,Jr.,RLA 75% Galen Pugh,RLA 60% Hannah Plate 75% Nicholas Kuhn,RLA 80% Drew Crumpton 75% Dale Morehouse,CID,CLIA 75% Jason Bird 70% AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcritecturat and Engineering Services 93 3. Approach & Methodology, continued Personnel Statement AECOM Office Printing/Scanning Hardware: Key personnel for AECOM will be available and assigned • Canon iR-ADV 8085/8095 to projects arising from this contract. Once we assign • Canon iR-ADV C5045/5051 a project team to an assignment,we commit the key • Canon iR-ADV C5250/5255 personnel to remain with the project until completion. In the unlikely case that key personnel are unable to complete • Canon iR-ADV C5030/5035 the assigned project,we will work closely with the City to • Canon imagePROGRAF Printer do what is necessary to smooth the transition between • Oce PlotWave 350 personnel and to maintain quality and consistency with the RICOH Printer Fiery •project schedule. • PS Driver for Universal Print Ability to Stay Within Budget The AECOM Team will utilize effective controls to provide AECOM Networking: projects in a timely fashion within the budgets established • Windows 2003/2008 Server Network for projects that are assigned by the City of Miami Beach. • NETAPP SAN —20 TB Data Storage At the outset for each project,we will develop a detailed • Exchange Server 2010 Mail Server scope of services based on the needs of the City that clearly defines project deliverables and is tied to a budget that • Tape Backup Libraries is mutually agreed upon by the City and AECOM. Product • Multiple File Servers quality is of the utmost importance to the AECOM Team. • VPN Connection to home users AECOM will use its ISO 9001-certified Quality Management System to ensure quality projects are submitted according AECOM Visual Communication/Photo Imaging to the scopes and budgets established at the outset of each AECOM is a recognized leader in visual communication project. because we are constantly searching for better ways to illustrate what are sometimes difficult to understand Managing Time planning ideas and concepts. Utilizing a variety of 3D Based on the needs of the City of Miami Beach,AECOM illustration techniques,such as SketchUp,AECOM's will work with the City to determine a schedule that clearly first priority is to clearly communicate important issues, defines project deliverables,project milestones/due dates, opportunities and design solutions so that everyone and community workshops or other public meetings. involved can understand and take ownership in the project. Technological Capabilities In photo imaging,actual photos of local scenes are altered to illustrate the impact of design or planning initiatives. The alterations can be either locally recognizable features Typical Workstations&Laptops Include • Dell Latitude E6400-E6420 Laptops,Optiplex 790-7010 up (for example, buildings)or can come from our library of to Precision T3500 Desktops scene components. Photo imaging is particularly effective in showing a sequence of actions and illustrating the • 4 GB/8 GB RAM or Higher cumulative effect of a combination of actions. • 17"to 22"Flat Panel Monitors • DVD+/- RW, 16X AECOM Transportation Engineering Software: AECOM transportation engineers are fluent with: Typical Software Packages Available: • Highway Capacity Software • Windows 7 Operating System • Microstation • MS Office 2010/2013 Suite • SOAP • Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign CS6 Design • Signal2000 Standard or higher • Transyt7F • Adobe Acrobat 11 Pro • TransCAD • Microstation v8i,XM,v8, • Cartegraph • AutoCAD 2008-2014 • SIGNview inventory database • ESRI ArcGIS 10— 10.2.2 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM 3. Approach & Methodology, Continued • FSUTMS traffic forecasting software • SYNCHRO • Visual Basic Plan • Plan for Ouality • Simulation models are created and used to test existing and • proposed configurations for study corridors. • Other Available Resources Quality Assurance,Quality Control . •} Do During the entire design process we utilize,as mandated Qu a`� `Y - c g g p Plan Plan-guild by our firm,a third-party quality control review process oualit,In that starts with the earliest milestone products we create. These efforts start at the`concept'level and proceed, • rigorously(as a matter of course via the internal prompting 41111°.. o of our online project management system)through the • documentation phase we use our AECOM quality assurance/ :� Chec •••••••k , quality control process.Our Quality Assurance/Quality '�'�'�'��' Control benefits are maximized through a well-defined conf,►mo�,at;ty process of communication involving all levels of the project team,along with a clear definition of project control and coordination activities.We utilize an in-house QA/QC "peer review"group to oversee the production of the final Quality is created by following a cycle that documents to assure their completeness and appropriate applies skills, knowledge, experience and level of detail.The peer review team will involve senior architects,landscape architects and engineers who are professional judgement to do things right experienced with the design and detailing of facilities and engage the client in all aspects of similar in scope and complexity.The peer review team will the project. The quality tools provided by check for accuracy,clarity,consistency,proper level of detail,compliance with all programming information and AECOM improve the likelihood of success. regulatory procedures and practices. Permitting, Bidding and Construction Administration AECOM has been a fixture in the south Florida region Architectural/Engineering industry for more than 80 years. For this reason,our firm has developed a solid working relationship with the various agencies with whom our team will need to coordinate with in order to ensure the timely delivery of any project regardless of scope or size. Our extensive knowledge of local conditions,permitting and approval procedures,and construction industry has allowed us to recognize and avoid the common pitfalls of this complicated process.Our hands-on experience with all of the tegulatory agencies who will be involved with projects located within the City of Miami Beach will be extremely beneficial to the City.Bid assistance will include conducting a pre-bid meeting with prospective contractors,answering bidders'questions,clarifying the final construction documents and project schedule,issuing required addenda, and evaluating submitted bids.Upon receipt of the bids, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitectural and Engineering Se-vices 95 3. Approach & Methodology, Continued we will work with the City of Miami Beach to evaluate the Our clients can attest to the incredible service from best construction value and provide recommendations for AECOM's team.We work hard to earn your trust and to efficient contractor selection.Our construction observation do whatever it takes to meet your needs and schedule. services can ensure quality and efficient implementation Our goal is to not just`to get the job,'it's to develop a conforming to the final construction documents and long term,collaborative relationship with your team, environmental permits and agreements.These services will to work together to implement successful projects. In include conducting a preconstruction meeting;issuance of order to achieve this we typically include the following a conformed set of drawings including the incorporation of techniques to assure that the target schedule is met: addenda and permitting requirements;review of contractor submittals and Requests for Information(RFIs);review of To Maintain Schedule: shop drawings(as required)for any components related to • Detailed project schedule the proposed design and issuing Architect's Supplemental • Pre-scheduled milestones,interim submittal dates, Instructions(ASIs);review of contractor pay applications; review periods and presentations issuing field orders and change orders as necessary to . Monthly status meetings document changes in the contract documents;conducting preliminary and final punch lists and facilitating final • Interim reviews and meetings acceptance of phases of construction. • Monthly status reports tied to invoices Management Toots Summary Our team understands the role of communication in We have a sense of the City's operational and managing a project in a clear and effective manner. As management style on public realm projects,but we demonstrated during the successful completion of also recognize that every project is unique.Our outline many public beautification projects,AECOM works of process,above,is written primarily to reassure within a collaborative environment and key to that is you that we know how to execute complex projects, extensive communication and public participation.We are and that we have and will continue to examine all the experienced at connecting individuals to work as a group variables that can make or break a project's trajectory. and are committed to engaging the public with neutral and Most importantly,based on that experience,we know purposeful facilitation.Because of our deep and varied that we will be working in a collaborative manner with background in design and technical execution of projects, City expectations,needs and direction to develop an we are able to educate through informed facilitation.Our acceptable,creative and successful process. philosophy for communication activities and techniques include: • Be transparent and true to the role of facilitator • Be respectful and listen well to all participants • Create a safe,fun and energized environment • Design exercises to be interesting,entertaining and informative • Build on the findings and results of each previous exercise • Assure equal opportunity for participation • Stay on time,on task and on schedule • Take time outs if needed to address new issues or to re-focus the discussion • Regularly check in with the group to make sure that we are on task • Incorporate food and music whenever possible! 96 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P-ofessional A'cnitectuval and Engineering Se-vices AECOM 3. Approach Methodology Conn,; Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Utilization AECOM will be engaging Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc.as a certified Miami-Dade County Small Business Enterprise. Department of Regut—Jry and Economic Resources MIAMI-DADE Small Business Development 111 NW 1 Street,19'"Floor COUNTY Miami,Florida 33128 Carlos A.Gimenez,Mayor T 305-375-3111 F 305-375-3160 CERT.NO:15467 Approval Date:11/07/2013-MICRO/SBE November 7,2013 Expiration Date:11/30/2016 Mr.Michael Gnaegy MIXD GREENS,INC. 28905 SW 162nd Ave Homestead,FL 33033-2200 Dear Mr.Gnaegy: Miami Dade County Small Business Development (SBD) under Business Affairs, a division of the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources(RER)has completed the review of your application and attachments submitted for certification. Your firm is officially certified as a Small Business Enterprise in accordance with section 2-8.1.1.1.1 of the Code of Miami Dade County. This certification is valid for three years provided that you submit a"Continuing Eligibility Affidavit"on or before your anniversary date of November 7,2014 and there are no changes in your firm pertinent to your certification eligibility. The submittal of a"Continuing Eligibility Affidavit"annually with specific supporting documents on or before your Anniversary Date is required to maintain the three year certification. You will be notified of this responsibility in advance of the Anniversary Date. Failure to comply with the said responsibilities may result in immediate action to decertify the firm. Pursuant to the applicable section of the code as listed above,"once your firm has been decertified,your firm shall not be eligible to re-apply for certification for twelve(12)months from the time of the decertification.' If, at any time, there is a material change in the firm, including, but not limited to, ownership, officers, Director, scope of work being performed, daily operations, affiliations with other business or physical location of the firm, you must notify this office, in writing, within(30)days. Notification should include supporting documentation. You will receive timely instructions from this office as to how you should proceed,if necessary. Your company is certified in the categories as listed below affording you the opportunity to bid and participate on contracts with goals.Please note that the categories listed are very general and are used only to assist our customers in searching the directory for certified firms to meet contract goals. The directory for all certified firms can be accessed on the Miami Dade County RER website ht tp://www.m iam idade.govIbus i nes s/business-certification-programs.asp. Thank you for doing business with Miami Dade County. S ere She' 1cGriff,Director Business Opportunity Support Services Small Business Development Division Regulatory and Economic Resources Department(RER) CATEGORIES:(Your firm may bid or participate on contracts only under these categories) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE MOWING,EDGING,PLANT(NOT TREE)TRIMMING.ETC.(MICRO/SBE) LANDSCAPING(INCLUDING DESIGN,FER11t.taNG,PLANTING,ETC.,BUT NOT GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OR TREE TRIMMING SERVICES)(MICROISBE) PEST CONTROL(OTHER THAN BUILDINGS)(INCLUDES SPRAYING OF TREES AND SHRUBS)(MICRO/SBE) TREE TRIMMING AND PRUNING SERVICES(MICRO/SBE) -�� . -- // -.-- WEED AND VEGETATK.NNCONTROL INCLUDING AQUATIC WE E1YCOfIIB I NICRQ/Skigri L>rKLC' `i`ern .Da;/ TREE AND SHRUB REMOVAL SERVICES(MICRO/SBE) L.) J DBDR0020 v20130626 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH D ofessional Arcnitecturat and Engineering Services 9 7 Exceptions to RFQ ExceptionstoRFO AECOM Technical Services,Inc.submits its Proposal ; -: :• : , - ; _ a --• . 1- to the extent in response to the City of Miami Beach Professional caused by the negligent performance of the agreement by Architectural and Engineering Services project. In the the contractor or its employees,agents,servants,partners, event of award,we respectfully request the opportunity to principals or subcontractors.The contractor shall pay negotiate the final terms and conditions of any resultant all claims and losses - -:- --- - -- -. • -,and shall contract. investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions of a-ny-krnel et-n-at-ttre in the name of the City,where applicable,including Exceptions to Request for Qualifications: ,and shalt pay all costs,judgments, and reasonable attorney's fees which may be incurred SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS& thereon to the extent liability is ultimately apportioned GENERAL CONDITIONS to the Consultant.The contractor expressly understands 20.PAYMENT.Payment will be made by the City within and agrees that any insurance protection required by this thirty days of receipt of a properly submitted invoice for the Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in services completed in accordance with the requirements of no way limit the responsibility to indemnify,keep and save the contract. : harmless and defend the City or its officers,employees, inspected,and found to comply with contract,specifications, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided.The above -- i ::--; I I- -- , :-. . --:.Invoices indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or must be consistent with Purchase Order format. termination of this Agreement. 22.MANNER OF PERFORMANCE.Proposer agrees to APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner 4.Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less and in accordance with all applicable Local,State,County, than$1,000,000 with the deductible per claim,if any,not to and Federal laws,rules,regulations and codes.Lack of - __ -_ •__ knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. 5.Excluding professional liability and workers Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided compensation,the City must be named as and additional by employees that are educated,and where required insured on the liability policies;and it must be stated on the by applicable laws trained,experienced,certified,and certificate. licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties.Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all Excluding professional liability,waiver of subrogation in documentation,certification,authorization,license,permit, favor of the City must be included for the policies required or registration currently required by applicable laws,rules, above.The insurance coverage required shall include those and regulations.Proposer further certifies that it and its classifications,as listed in standard liability insurance employees will keep all licenses,permits,registrations, manuals,which most nearly reflect the operations of the authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws vendor. or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract.Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.5 CONSULTANT:The named entity on page 1 of this Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Agreement,the"Consultant"shall mean the architect/ Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform engineer who has entered into a contract with the City work or services as a result of any contract resulting from to provide the Services described under this Agreement. this solicitation,the contractor will assume the full duty, - obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, _ = •• permits,and i n s u r a n c e,: -: :--. - : -;--: -- --- -:--. ,: i _ ; Jr" -;- ; -- •r e q u i r e d to comply with all applicable laws.The contractor = -- • --- -- -•-- • - = '= "" ._-, : shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City ,r In accordance with Section 558 ET SEQ of the to the extent caused by negligence of the proposer,or its Florida Statues and to the fullest extent permitted by law, officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to City acknowledges and agrees that no individual employee comply with applicable laws. or agent of consultant shall be held individually liable for damages resulting from negligence occurring within the 31.INDEMNIFICATION.The contractor shall indemnify and scope and course of this agreement. Any sub-consultants hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to and instrumentalities from any and all liability,losses or the prior written approval of the City Manager.Consultant damages,including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the defense,which the City or its officers,employees,agents or contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's.Any instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims,demands, such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and suits,causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature protect the rights of the City under this Agreement.Nothing AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitecturat and Engineering Services contained i n this Agreement shall create any contractual : :: :•-e a• -.: - : , •- - -- -: .:-: ::: :•-: relationship between the City and sub-consultants.Any :. -• - : . • : . approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not,in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project,Consultant represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Consultant to City.Payment of sub-consultants shall Federal,State,and local laws codes,rules and regulations be the responsibility of the Consultant,and shall not be applicable in the jurisdiction(s)in which the Project is cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant located,including,without limitation,applicable Florida for payment of the Basic Services.The quality of services Statutes,and State of Florida codes,rules and regulations, and acceptability to the City of the services performed by and local(City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of ordinances,codes,and rules and regulations(collectively, Consultant. "Applicable Laws").As they relate to the Services and to the Project,the Consultant agrees to comply with all The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the such Applicable Laws in force at the time the Services are City Manager for the Project: performed,whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time,: -: - -: . -- . " •- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; - -- -" - - • - - --:. : . • .• • 6" :•.: If,after the date of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. this Agreement,there is any change in said laws,ordinances, 1.8 BASIC SERVICES:"Basic Services"shall include those codes,licenses,permits,agreements,rules or regulations services which Consultant shall perform in accordance which increase or decrease the services to be provided,or with the applicable standard of care and the terms of the cost or expenses incurred by the Consultant in performing Agreement(and as required to complete the Project),as the services under this Agreement,then the Consultant's further described in Article 2 and Schedule"A"hereto. compensation otherwise payable under this Agreement shall _ be increased or decreased accordingly by mutual agreement between the Parties hereto." == == Recognizing that the construction of other projects within 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE:"Force Majeure"shall mean any delay the City may affect scheduling of the construction for occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by the Project,the Consultant shall diligently reasonable violence in nature without the interference of human agency coordinate performance of the Services with the City such as hurricanes,tornadoes,floods,toss caused by fire (through the Project Coordinator)in order to provide for the and other similar unavoidable casualties;or by changes in = -" completion of Federal,State or local laws,ordinances,codes or regulations the Project pursuant to customary professional standard of enacted after the date of this Agreement;or other causes care and to the extent possible,without negatively impacting beyond the parties'control which have,or may be reasonably concurrent work by others.The Consultant shall coordinate expected to have,a material adverse effect on the Project, the Services with all of its sub-consultants,as well as other or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this consultants,including,without limitation,City provided Agreement and which,by the exercise of due diligence, consultants(if any). such parties shall not have been able to avoid;provided, 2.4 The Consultant represents to City that however,that inclement weather(except as noted above), all of the Services required under this Agreement shall the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, be performed in accordance with the standard of care market conditions,labor conditions,construction industry normally exercised in the design of comparable projects price trends,and similar matters which normally impact on in South Florida.Consultant represents to the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force the City that it is experienced,fully qualified,and properly Majeure. licensed(pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation Services.Consultant represents to City that under this Agreement due to a force majeure,the Consultant it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator (including,without limitation,the Design Documents business days of Consultant becoming aware contemplated in Schedule"A"hereto). that said force majeure will have an impact on the schedule. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES:Written Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not - `' • constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility _ . . and liability of the Consultant(or of any of its o€€i-cet-5; sub-consultants,a ),for CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM the accuracy and competency of its/their designs,working coordination of all work required under the Agreement drawings,plans,technical specifications,or other technical (including the work performed by sub-consultants),within documents,nor shall such approval and/or decisions be the specified time period and specified cost.The Consultant deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by shall perform the work utilizing the skill,knowledge,and the City fora-de-feet,error or omission in designs,working judgment ordinarily possessed and used by drawings,plans,technical specifications,or other technical -:--. •-_ •• documents;provided,however,that the Consultant shall be 4- : - . : ••: ; " 6 i members entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of the Consultants's professional performing the same or of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City similar services under similar conditions in similar localities. pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant is responsible for,and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements,as 2.7 TIME: •-:- - ::: : -- set forth in the Agreement.The Consultant shall be and - ,the parties remain liable to the City for all damages to the City to the agree as follows: extent caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work.In addition 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as to all other rights and remedies,which the City may have, expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of the Consultant shall,at its expense,re-perform all or any professional skill and care required by this Agreement,and portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which to the orderly progress of the Wer-k the Services. the extent result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards.The Consu tans shall 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule,attached to as Schedule"E"hereto.The Consultant may submit requests - -- - -for an adjustment to the Project Schedule,if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review - taken by the City(or other governmental authorities having _ jurisdiction over the Project)to approve the Consultant's ' -: :• ::: :: :•,.The Project Coordinator submissions,or any other portion of the Services requiring shall notify the Consultant,in writing,of any deficiencies approval by the City(or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project).Consultant shall and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. within 14 days of the delay provide the Project Neither the City's inspection,review,approval or acceptance Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the of,nor payment for,any of the work required under the particular delay;the requested adjustment(i.e.extension)to Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant(or the Project Schedule;and a revised anticipated schedule of any sub-consultant)of its obligations and responsibilities completion.Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request under the Agreement,nor constitute a waiver of any of (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator the City's rights under the Agreement,or of any cause of may require),the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable action arising out of the performance of the Agreement.The extension of time for completion of the particular work Consultant and its sub-consultants shall be and remain involved,and authorize that the appropriate adjustment liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for be made to the Project Schedule.The Project Coordinator's all damages to City to the extent caused by any failure of approval(if granted)shall be in writing. - : :• the Consultant 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts endeavor to or any sub-consultants'willful misconduct,unlawful acts, maintain a constructive,professional,cooperative working negligent acts,errors or omissions in the performance of relationship with the Project Coordinator,Contractor,and the Agreement.With respect to the performance of work any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been by sub-consultants,the Consultant shall,in approving contracted,or otherwise retained,to perform work on the and accepting such work,ensure the professional quality, Project. completeness,and coordination of the sub-consultant's work. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent,timely and professional manner, 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for dtT and shall be responsible to the City for any failure negligent act,error or omission in its performance,except to the extent construction services not conforming to the customary that acts or omissions by the City or other circumstances standard of care and any such services re-performed beyond Consultant's control make such performance within twelve(12)months following final acceptance and impossible. shall be subject to further re-performance,repair and replacement for twelve(12)months from the date of initial The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, re-performance,not to exceed twenty-four months(24)from technical accuracy,completeness,performance and final acceptance. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional ATnitectural and Engineering Services . : - • :- = • - • : -: . 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct,by passage of • .- an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: Section 25-5.2575,Florida Statutes,and Chapter 100 of -- • . :: ,;- :: - ;• :- ;- • • :- -- - 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant,the City = Commission shall hear appeals from administrative •' decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator.In such cases,the Commission's decision shall be final and 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS:All services provided by sub- binding upon all parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, consultants shall be consistent with those commitments nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the waiver of Consultant's right to seek recourse through a court competitive solicitation selection process and interview. of competent jurisdiction. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST and the sub-consultants,which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this • Agreement.Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create "" any contractual relationship between the City and the sub- consultants. 4.3 Consultant shall we d represent to the City that its Consultant's review and evaluation of the Construction The Consultant shall not retain,add,or replace any Cost Budget,Statement of Probable Construction Cost,and sub-consultant without the prior written approval of any other cost estimates prepared(or otherwise provided) the City Manager,in response to a written request from by Consultant for the Project,represent Consultant's the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed lest professional judgment as an experienced design substitution.Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City professional familiar with the construction industry; Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for provided,however,that Consultant cannot(and does the quality and acceptability by the City of the services not)guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other the City.The quality of services;-: . . ::• • • -- • cost evaluation(s)prepared(or otherwise provided)by o``he see vices performed by sub-consultants shall be the Consultant. sole responsibility of Consultant.The Consultant shalt cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant • portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and " - ' ` ` ' " `' ' specifications. xtraordinary,and unforeseen circumstances ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES ; • 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project.Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges ; that,in making any such information available to Consultant, • -.-- :.::- •- ,. the City makes no express or implied certification,warranty, -: - . . . . .- - : -- - -, - --.-; - -•- . = -- -- and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of .-: . such information.The Consultant understands,and hereby the City. agrees and acknowledges,that it is obligated to verify to the al _ •, _ a, -- • ;•-- .. -- - -•-- - - ; •;- -- - -- o p t i o n)authorize rebidding of the Project;(3)abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any Consistent with the professional standard ; a-" a a " " "" a"" •- :- :•= ,= of care and unless otherwise specifically provided herein, ." = =•"" == Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of data and information provided by the City or others without =" "• -" -""" "= - . -•"" ="" •" " independent review or evaluation. - _ _• CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 'ofessional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM -- -::-, -- :--• --: : :••:- ;-• -:•• i ARTICLE 11.INSURANCE _ ;-- -- :;-•---- - ,: ; ; ;. 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, ;•-: -- •--- - --; - •---- Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance • -: coverage in full force and effect.The Consultant shall not --• -• • • •• • ••-- - - commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required - -- - ., ; -- ;-- _- - 6- :•;:- • insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES (a)Professional Liability Insurance,in the amount of one 7.6 No retainage shall be-made held from the Consultant's million dollars($1,000,000.00),per occurrence claim,with compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence claim, payments to Contractor. $450,000 aggregate.Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator,in writing,within thirty(30)days of any claims ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy in the event such claims affect coverage related to the 9.3 At the City's option,the Consultant may be authorized, Project. as an Additional Service,to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; -: -•- , ::•---- o -- 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance _ -• ; - _ -•-- "" " " -- -• _- -- -_ _ =- company rated B+:VI or better,or its equivalent,according -a -; - -= - - to Bests'Guide Rating Book,and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida,and 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project - Documents or any components thereof without permission 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with from the Consultant or without any additional compensation a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. to the Consultant.The Consultant shall be released from any The City reserves the right to require amt-ified copy of such liability resulting from such modification. policies,upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City,the 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08,Florida Statutes,the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the and its officers,employees,designated agents,and date of termination(as such date is set forth in,or can be instrumentalities,from liabilities,damages,losses,and calculated from,the City's initial written default notice). costs,including,but not limited to,reasonable attorneys' Upon payment of all amounts: :--:. - -•-- :- due fees,to the extent caused by the negligence,recklessness, to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2,the City or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and shall have no further liability to Consultant. other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE:In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause,the City through the -- ;--. - --; ;;. , - -. City Manager,may also terminate this Agreement,upon ;-; --; :; --- -• fourteen(14)days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause,and without penalty,when(in ..-- - - -: ;;;- --; its sole discretion)it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City.In the event the City terminates .Consultant expressly understands and agrees the Agreement for convenience,Consultant shall be that any insurance protection required by this Agreement compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit accepted up to the termination date(as set forth in the City's its responsibility to indemnify,keep,and save harmless written notice),and for Consultant's costs in assembly and and defend the City or its officers,employees,designated delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents agents,and instrumentalities as herein provided. (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above).Upon payment of all amounts :-• .--:•- -• - a- due to Consultant 12.2 -- ---• : pursuant this subsection 10.3,the City shall have no further --- :- -- : .. liability to Consultant. wrongful actions,errors or omissions of the Consultant - '- ;- --.In reviewing, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, be-re-till-der: Likewise,the City agrees that the Consultant's or other acts of the Consultant,the City in no way assumes total liability of any cause of action in connection with the or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant services provided under this Agreement,including,but not (including,without limitation its sub-consultants and/or any limited to claims for breach of contract,claims of negligence _•- - - - and/or claims for indemnity,shall in no event exceed the . Neither party to this Agreement shall be "not to exceed"amount received by Consultant under this liable to the other party or any third party claiming through Agreement. the other respective party,for any special,incidental, indirect,punitive,liquidated,delay or consequential 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: damages of any kind including but not limited to lost profits or use of property,facilities or resources,that may 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection result from this Agreement,or out of any goods or services 16.5.2,the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable furnished hereunder. Federal,State,and City procedures, in effect at the time the Project _ . , --:- Documents are produced,by which the documents are handled,copied,and distributed which may include,but .... . .. .. •- - • • • ;_ --: -; is not limited to,each employee of Consultant and sub- ;-• -:-- .- •: -- • • ;- -;•--: consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate,or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager,in writing. 16.7 WARRANTY STANDARD OF CARE:The Consultant _-; ;. .; _ ___ 11;- -_ warrants represents that the Services furnished to the City under this Agreement shall conform to the y- :. - :-- :-: .-.: : 6.':-: :. -- • : - -- State-of-Re-ride reasonable care and skill in accordance and :• ::--:_-- -;•--: :• -- consistent with the professional standards applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. - 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY:Notwithstanding any provision of = this non-exclusive Agreement,the City is not precluded from -- • - . _ ; ;.---- - - ; -- - :- -- ; -- retaining or utilizing any other architect,engineer,design -- ; - - ;.---,;.-- -- professional or other consultant to perform any incidental - : -• • -• - ••• Basic Services,Additional Services,or other professional :: • - - -- -; •a- •- - -; . ; ; ; . services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other • ---_ _ _. ---- „- - • __ •- •• •_, ._ • . - -_ . architect,engineer,design professional,or other consultant -- .• -- - -- --; ;-•-- ;. -- ;--•-•;- to perform any such incidental Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing,Consultant shall have no liability to the City for ,_ ; _. ;; , ; - - ; _;- ;--;- -_ any work performed by any third party relating to a project under this Agreement. been exh.,..sted 16.9 ASSIGNMENT:The Consultant shall not assign, ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person,firm, association or corporation,in whole or in part,without the The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so prior written consent of the City Commission,which consent, doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause • _••-- - --; - of action for money damages due to an alleged breach dietretre-rn shall not be unreasonable withheld.However, by the City of this Agreement,so that its liability for any the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the such breach never exceeds the"not to exceed"amount Services to be performed by sub-consultants,subject to the of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement,less prior written approval of the City Manager. any amount(s)actually paid to Consultant hereunder. - ,.• • - - - - •- - 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:The Consultant and ----- ;- --;.- . --- -- • . : :-. the City each binds himself/herself,his/her partners, • - -- : ;- •-- -6 ; successors,legal representatives and assigns and to -, ;- '- "-; ---;„ -- -;- -•- _ ------ --- the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, • • , --a. - - -- •.7. • ;:•; ;. -- • • ; -- ;--. : - successors,legal representatives,and assigns of such party CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P-ofessionet Arcnitectu rat and Engineering Services AECOM in respect to all covenants of this Agreement.The Consultant shall afford the City(through the City Commission)the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors : : -- --;- -- '- -- ;.. -- - a - .- • - ; -- : - - ;- .Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services,and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services in accordance with the standard of care : ; • • •-- •• --, ;: : :- • : :. -- • a - • • :. ::--.The Consultant shall perform,as Basic Services,such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced,as necessary to complete the Project. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P-ofessional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 107 About AECOM With nearly 100,000 employees—including architects, engineers,designers,planners,scientists and management and construction services professionals—serving clients in more than 150 countries around the world following the acquisition of URS,AECOM is a premier,fully integrated infrastructure and support services firm.AECOM is ranked as the#1 engineering design firm by revenue in Engineering News-Record magazine's annual industry rankings.The company is a leader in all of the key markets that it serves,including transportation,facilities, environmental,energy,oil and gas,water,high-rise buildings and government.AECOM provides a blend of global reach,local knowledge,innovation and technical excellence in delivering solutions that create,enhance and sustain the world's built, natural and social environments.A Fortune 500 company, AECOM companies,including URS Corporation and Hunt Construction Group,had revenue of approximately$19.5 billion during the 12 months ended Sept.30,2014.More information on AECOM and its services can be found at www.aecom.com. Contact AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 800 Douglas Entrance North Tower,2nd Floor Coral Gables,FL 33134 T 305 444 4691 F 305 447 3580 www.aecom.com . •,i,' -S/ ��. ,, t .-� / l ;� r. e r • , , ,,..„,„ , ...,.....i ,.. i„.„, d- ... •• -\Tf‘' . .._ '• .. .,-__ Cl) CD e : }-... - 20 r—t cat r= . — C..., Cover Letter & -..... _. Minimum Qualifications a' _ . 1 . , 1 • ,. 1 ''�r Requirements _ - 'AIN Ar --:' 1�'tom• •_'7�j "�it't. � # .y � •"6 4 - r raJ °L,z, 4.-.. s 4 til , ._____ ^ 7 �'r r 4 a - !.a .4 x, ,,,, . „Al'1/4"'..'. 1 . �•" '�' ,,�.� -,,.•. 1, 44' V Vire° *. ' . 4 , ,. ® ..i� mss.• } f e .^• +;iii! , ,A,,..•—w ^l " -., X14 Oil° it: — 6 f 'y4 • \ } 7 Ar..4.... .: ,,.. :, .,,,4 . • . - • A • ' , 4116 ' -.# i ' 9.k. 7 .4 II e ' * . .0 g it '''.4,...n ;44 — '"' pp 0 fi r! a d'w ♦ _ ) 4 f> 4A 3 .re's w r,4 s•. —, ! r. j , ,. , 11„:1 tAS' i''' ft., . * 17 %. —, — , . Pe t. ,. .s. ,.-1/4.., ift,t, . $4 - 1. t ,,, .. . . . if T ., ,, . ,8 ,; ,..41 .1'1 e 7 =,fib^ 4q -,*Ix `AICv 4. t . 3.�: 4.-. a r� e. if ♦ l° gyp♦, it y,• *a 1111411 1 i., , ,,,,,,„1„,„r ., f *.1-41, '. * . ,•,. 1, .. , . a„ 0 ,, , 0 , 0 ' :' , .‘4N S t' eai I #''., rt s... . , i ..„), ,.., , , .4. -. ,, 41, . ,..„, ,, - •,,,... ,,,..* * s. i —,6. . • 1 .1 Cover Page & Table of Contents -,.... ..,,-,- , '-' 4..st-i:.•-•:',4).:0,-,2.-‘,-,-- e' '---` - , -*"",.-.T. .' - --- ,bip.,.s,t..r.7, --- ,1, A -, 0, ^,q).,...N fc.,,,' f," ,,,.,,V ...„14',-;34,4 :" . 'zillt ,;.,,,.. N--- ."4''. a>.\":'1,--- pal- ,' ,!--' '1,1'-'-'044or'Pv."'s ", I, ' ' - .,"".'.. -.... .?,r,„,",, .e-A-:., , ,...i.,,• -_-. '.,,,--, , , -,,,,,- i,- • --,,t,-,,,,,..z -,-. - r, .' lr- ii..*A."':" .4.,',Ii$01,0* • . - - -' ".., :,1v,,T.,r.,-‹. ;••••;,-, ii, . -;',0--- ... '---..: ..,, ,----- .- *.-,.. ...;).' , ;04, ; fq f. , ' -`'‘. '''''. 4;', "' ".''',.,i;,,,,,t'.? ... 4 •••. / "-;',.. : ',,t, - v,9; , - , "'rt.,. ._• - . •,, '•••)'ti;?"'taKt-Y-.''' .. tz.k..,,,,..., -4,-t,14 4 . ‘7,, ...'= • ',, , , ,*.„.7,' ....... , .. - v.., .4., ,.,1,,,, jir ',.. . 's ... k: ,. 'INt44,.':?...iv......,ir.4 'A•_11'; , ; ', .4,,' `I . . • , -4. ,. ,1".•.v.,‘„,,,,,,"-.10 r... ''''‘''''#10''' '-''. ' '',,,,•''t t.;" .4 1.e 1 ' it, -. - ...1 '4, " '.. ' -',... „It>, .4.• ',;.,• '-"' • i 4,4..,AS%',I-,-,-•,,,'"',., •"'5,--, '.': ,,- e ' '''.-Yr r' ..,1 "" I: .,1, . ....s„,14,..tc4r1.,,- •'," .,i= i.•..•-•. .- ..t.....,,,_,I:... . . , . -4.1...., . „..1.:.4. -.% L. . . ...-, ...-','`..1 ' . . . • ' ' - , -• 'you(-I.*- , ..-,.•)..- .71,•--..., 14%,.. ,,tr,...,.-- .., '.*. ''k..;''''",...:,t, .i..,'' • , ...L':, .4..-ir t .7''''''' ' ' i• _ '....' 4,"4‘..'..4..,,t . " ., 11..,` 1.,., ' . , ','..,_- .. n- • • .,, ,."; . __ - -'iv. , 7-ns.,. ,' - - ' . .•- . • !, •"-• A.7-., / - - • ,,, -- '.-4,-,.4",- 0.0",Air.‘•' ' - . -- -- ---5- . .. , , . 7 _- ., .--- __---- ' . '' . - . -- ■■_ . - ,. . ... \', ...„r,.... ...''''. / "...................- ..■......■ • ..+■■... -- .5.2:4C,' ^*!. tt.f ./ ' ,-1 •--;'., ,:%';',- ,4 '' =,..."..,, ents.... / - ' ‘...,............. .....--'"'.- -0- 01 Cover tetter&Minimum Qualifications 1 1.1 Cover Page and Table of Contents 1 1.2 Response Certification,Questionnaire and . ' . ....0.. ..----:—. Requirements Affidavit 5 , . . . ' 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 24 / t'7 . . • , P _ 4 X ' n2 - _ Experience 8 e. J."f'," /i, , *,e• . ,, , ,. 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm&2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team 37 if " „, -„ 2.3 Financial Capacity 61 . 03 Approach&Methodotop,' , - e .. . ., ,..., , Fyentionc trl .. ..., / AECOM AECOM 305 444 4691 tel 800 Douglas Entrance 305 447 3580 fax North Tower,2nd Floor Coral Gables,FL 33134 www.aecom.com December 2,2014 Mr.Yusbel Gonzalez,CPPB City of Miami Beach Department of Procurement Management 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: RFQ 2014-346-YG,Professional Architectural and Engineering Services GROUP A-Architecture,Planning and Urban Design Dear City of Miami Beach Selection Committee: AECOM is pleased to submit our qualifications and approach for providing Recreational Planning Support Services to City of Miami Beach.We have thoroughly enjoyed working with the City's staff performing park planning and design services including the recently completed Altos Del Mar Park and the Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape Improvement project.We are impressed with the City's work to prepare,provide,and implement high quality public spaces that balance recreation access and natural resource protection.We are excited about the opportunity to continue this collaboration. Our unique qualifications include: • Extensive Park Planning Experience—We have extensive experience in park planning,including site and context analysis,programming,public participation,needs assessments and system plans,natural resource evaluation and management planning,design guideline preparation,and master plan and construction plan preparation. • Proven Management Team—Our team has provided on-time,on-budget high quality projects for the City, including the Altos Del Mar Park and the Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape Improvement project. • Nationally Known Team—AECOM is a national leader in parks and recreation planning and has worked on parks plans in more than 75 communities around the U.S. • Knowledge of Miami Beach—We have conducted work in Miami Beach for several years and are very familiar with the park system,natural resources,and recreational opportunities. • Multi-Disciplinary Team—Our team of park planners,landscape architects,civil engineers and arborists work seamlessly to provide the services necessary to assess,plan,and design high quality park spaces. • Proven Methodology—We have a tested methodology and process for successfully completing park planning assignments,including public involvement and facilitation. We believe the AECOM Team is uniquely qualified to provide Recreational Planning Support Services to the City of Miami Beach.The following submittal further defines our qualifications,general approach,and extensive experience for recreation planning and design in the City of Miami Beach and throughout Florida.We appreciate your consideration of AECOM for this very important assignment and look forward to discussing.our ideas with you. Sincerely!'' F; l' Adid1661SA-- Randy ejeur, MS, LEED AP Greg Ault Authorized Signatory Principal-in-Charge AECOM Technical Services, Inc. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. randy.mejeur @aecom.com greg.ault @aecom.com AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 3 • • 1 2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit Soli:Ration No: Solicitaion Title: RFC)2014-346-YG PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN'AS-NEEDED-BASIS" Fnowremen:Contaa TeL I Email: Yusbel Gonzalez 305.673.7000,Ext.6230 yusbelgonzalez @rniamibeachfi Qov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors. and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME:AECOM Technical Services. Inc. No.of.Yearsin;?usiness 44 .No;of Years inA3usiness.Localty:,88 No cCEmployee 95;000:,worldwide OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Earth Tech, Inc.(08/03/1995-1110912008) FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): .1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600 CITY: Los Angeles, STATE: I ZIP CODE: California I 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: (213)593-8100 TOLL FREE:NO.: Not Applicable FAX NO.: (213)593-8187 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 800 Douglas Entrance,North Tower,2nd Floor CITY: Coral Gables STATE:_ ZIP CODE: Florida 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS.ENGAGEMENT: Randy Mejeur,MS,LEED AP ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (407)4843-6552 ACCOUNT REP TCLL FREE NO.:. Not Applicable ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: randv.meluer@aecom.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION-NO.:. 95-2661922 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. KFQ 201 4-346-YG Appendix A—Page 1 AECOM CITYOF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 5 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES ✓ 1 NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates.AECOM does not have any family members who are employees of the City of Miami Beach. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director,agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:If answer to above is"YES, Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). Please see attached AECOM's Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation statement. 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be,solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,.of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the.City of Miami Beach. AECOM does not have a financial interest with the City of Miami Beach. 5. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that.Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response, or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Please see attached AECOM's Code of Business Ethics. 6. - - - - - - - ''= - •- - • _ • - • -- - - - - - --• - _ : . . . - - . •-• - - • - , - '• - - - - -- ... - - - -- - -- - - 'erg RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 2 6 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 7. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors.maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and,the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ✓ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? ✓ YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified.Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health ✓ ✓ Sick Leave ✓ Family Medical Leave ✓ ✓ Bereavement Leave ✓ ✓ If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you,may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a.conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months. following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. • RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A—Page 3 AECOM CITYOF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 7 9. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm R- -iit R••-i.t Receipt Addendum 1 P Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 ' Addendum 7 Addendum 12 • Addendum 3 j/ ^ Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 • Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 4 8 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A-cnitecturat and Engineering Services AECOM DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipients convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disdosure and.Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable. definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to,the best of its knowledge,,information;and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. • RFQ 2014-346 YG Appendix A—Page 5 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 9 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Randy Mejeur, MS, LEED AP Principal Signature of P. .:-r's Aulhoriz;.Represen.y:: Date: / e'i. / November 24, 2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this2y day of A:AC.0-0;20d personally appeared before me2an6.k NAtzyur who County of Cm ) stated that (s)he is the ?In ne-k � of PseCoM , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: No ary Public for thate of Florida � Notary Public�°of Florida My Commission Expires: €Fi)too 1 201-7 Laura Garaa '�j� My Commission FF 034273 ?gyp Expires 09!1612017 RFQ 2014-346-YG Appendix A— Page 6 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ProfessionatA'clitectj'a.a'd-lgiiee-'ngSeti'cas AECOM 1 .2.3 Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation AECOM Technical Services,Inc.("ATS")has not within Thereafter,in February 2014,a company outside the the three-year period preceding this certification had control of ATS, but in which ATS's ultimate parent AECOM one or more public transactions(Federal,state or local) Technology Corporation holds an interest(AECOM Sunset terminated for cause or default except as follows: Olive,LLC)purchased a 50%interest in a project known as Sunset Time,which is located in the Sunset Specific plan 1)in November of 2012,AECOM received a notice from area.ATS provided the City with information showing that the City of Sarasota, Florida,notifying AECOM that it has although two entities(ATS and AECOM Sunset Olive, LLC) terminated its contract with AECOM for the design of a have partial overlapping ownership,their management sewer lift station for default. AECOM disagrees with the structures and reporting relationships are wholly separate. termination.The City of Sarasota ultimately filed suit. Nonetheless,on June 19,2014,ATS received notice from AECOM is vigorously defending the City's claims and the the City that it was terminating the contracts for cause, matter remains pending;and but would be willing to agree to a mutual termination if ATS would take certain actions.On August 27,2014,the 2) In August 2013 and December 2013,AECOM Technical City and ATS mutually agreed that the terminations of the Services,Inc.(ATS)entered into contracts with the Sunset Specific Plan Contract and 8228 Contract are for the City of West Hollywood,California(City)to update the convenience of the City. Sunset Specific Plan relative to billboards and tall walls. AECOM CITYOF MIAMI BEACH ' Professional Arcnitecturai and Engineering Services 11 1 .2.5 Code of Business Ethics AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy November 2012 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Policy 3 Responsibility 3 Specific Guidelines of the FCPA 4 Record Keeping and Accounting 4 Illegal Payments 5 Permissible Payments 5 Dealings with Agents/Partners 6 Periodic Audits 7 Disciplinary Procedures or Penalties 7 Definitions 8 Attachment A(Agent Due Diligence) 9 Attachment B (Red Flags) 11 Executive Summary Thi s policy was created to establish accountability and provide guidance for employees of AECOM and its subsidiaries to ensure ethical business conduct through compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, including without limitation, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA); the United Kingdom Bribery Act (2010) (UKBA); the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) anti-bribery convention; the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance promulgated under Hong Kong's Independent Commission Against Corruption; the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act in Canada; and the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) in Australia. The foregoing laws are collectively("Applicable Laws"). The purpose of this policy is not to describe all of the specific requirements or provisions of the Applicable Laws; rather the purpose is to promulgate AECOM standards to comply with Applicable Laws and to provide tools to detect and prevent suspected violations of Applicable Laws. Because most Applicable Laws focus on interactions with government officials, this policy does as well. Please refer to AECOM's Code of Conduct with respect to guidance in dealing with officials at private sector clients and more generally for guidance on AECOM's core principles and ' conduct expectations. This policy applies to AECOM and its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees, Agents and other persons performing similar functions worldwide. The Applicable Laws generally do not contain any "materiality" standard and is not limited to cash transactions; any violation, regardless of the amount involved, is considered equally serious. Please see the definitions section after this policy for the meanings of terms not defined within this policy. Policy AECOM will only use lawful and ethical business practices while conducting business activities. Any means to influence contract awards or to gain other business advantage by illegal payments, bribes, kickbacks or other questionable inducements will not be tolerated. Please refer to AECOM Code of Conduct for our policy for reporting violations of Applicable Laws and Finance and Accounting Policy 7070 regarding requirements for Reporting of Thefts/Fraud/Misappropriations. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 2 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 13 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM AECOM may not make, or offer to make, payments of money or anything else of value, directly or indirectly, to any Government Official (a) to influence any act or decision of such official in his official capacity; (b)to induce such official to do or omit to do any act in violation of his lawful duty; (c) to induce such official to use his influence with a government; and/or (d) to secure any improper advantage, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or obtaining other business advantage. AECOM will not tolerate conscious disregard or willful blindness to circumstances suggesting that such an act will be carried out by a third party, such as an Agent. AECOM will (1) make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and financial condition, including dispositions of assets, of the company, and (2) devise and maintain a system of adequate internal accounting controls. Responsibility AECOM Chief Financial Officer(CFO) 1. Maintain accurate financial data and implement controls to ensure AECOM complies with the books and records provision of Applicable Laws. 2. Collect and maintain the quarterly acknowledgement of compliance with Applicable Laws by all applicable Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders and applicable Business Line and Geography Chief Executives which will be incorporated as part of regular quarterly certifications in connection with Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings. 3. Working with the Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer (CECO), define F&A personnel required to complete mandatory anti-corruption training. Enterprise Leadership Council (ELC), Business Line and Geography Chief Executives and Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders 1. Although the AECOM CFO has a key leadership responsibility for compliance with this policy, the ELC; Business Line and Geography Chief Executives, and Business Line and Geography Finance Leaders have the primary responsibility for ensuring compliance with this policy for their respective areas of responsibilities, including ensuring adequate communication to, and understanding by, all staff; periodically communicating with management to gauge awareness of any violations of this policy; reporting any such violations immediately; and otherwise being alert to ensuring compliance with this policy. General Counsel (GC), Assistant General Counsel for Compliance and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer(CECO) 1. Follow-up and/or investigate, or cause to be investigated, allegations of potential non- compliance with Applicable Laws. 2. Review recent developments and changes to Applicable Laws, and communicate any changes to AECOM employees, subsidiaries and Agents. 3. Develop and provide periodic training on requirements of Applicable Laws. 4. Review submissions of proposed arrangements for legality as well as approval under AECOM policies, including the Delegations of Authority. 5. Collect and maintain the quarterly acknowledgement of compliance with Applicable Laws by appropriate members of the Law Department which will be incorporated as part of regular quarterly certifications in connection with Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings. 6. Inform, as appropriate, the Audit Committee and Nominating &Governance Committee of possible violations of Applicable Laws or legal issues brought to the attention of the GC. 7. Update the Audit Committee and the Nominating &Governance Committee as necessary regarding AECOM's compliance issues and areas of focus for the coming year. VP of Internal.Audit 1. Conduct assessments and/or audits to ensure that financial and operational controls are effectively designed by the AECOM CFO and are working appropriately. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 3 November 2012 14 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH j Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM 2. Follow-up and/or investigate allegations of potential non-compliance with Applicable Laws, under the direction of the GC. 3. Working with the AECOM CFO, GC, Global Controller and CECO, refine and modify this policy to reflect best practices and "lessons learned". Key Provisions of Applicable Laws Record Keeping and Accounting • Applicable Laws prohibit the falsification of books and records and set forth certain accounting requirements. Generally,AECOM and its subsidiaries are required to: 1. Maintain books and records in reasonable detail and that accurately and fairly reflect transactions and disposition of assets. To this end, all transactions must be accurately recorded in accordance with AECOM policies and any additional enhanced controls or procedures as determined to be appropriate by the AECOM CFO and CECO, or their respective designates, for a specific location'. AECOM and its subsidiaries are prohibited from maintaining undisclosed or unrecorded funds or assets established for any purpose. Examples of an undisclosed or unrecorded fund or asset include, but are not limited to: • Unrecorded petty cash; • Real or personal property held by a third party; • Bank accounts containing corporate funds but held in the names of individuals; • Bank accounts in the name of the company but only disclosed and accessible to a limited number of individuals; • Records that disguise any aspect of the transaction (for example, entering a payment to"Y"when payment was made to"Z"); and • Any indirect payment, as Applicable Laws prohibit making an indirect corrupt payment "knowing" that the payment, or portion of the payment, will be directly or indirectly made or offered to a foreign official (for example, entering a $100,000 payment to Agent "X" when in reality there was an understanding that agent "X" would be paying $20,000 of that amount to a foreign official). "Knowing" includes conscious disregard or deliberate ignorance. 2. Devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: • All transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization. • Transactions are recorded as necessary to allow the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and to maintain accountability for assets. • Access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's authorization. • The recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. 3. Report any (a) requests for payments or other consideration that would violate this policy or (b) transactions, whether in the past or current, that appear to violate this policy or otherwise appear suspicious in nature as stated in the AECOM Code of Conduct, "How Do I Raise Concerns"section. Enhanced controls include but are not limited to procedures to prevent unauthorized use of funds(such as limits on number of bank and petty cash accounts,additional controls around petty cash and checking signing capabilities),enhanced controls regarding vendor approval process,additional processing and monitoring controls for high risk transactions or additional staffing for stringent segregation of duties. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 4 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 15 Globe Ethical Business Conduct Policy A ECOM Illegal Payments Applicable Laws generally prohibit individuals or businesses from authorizing, offering or paying anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any Government Official for the purpose of influencing or causing another person to influence any act or decision of a Government Official or government to obtain or retain business or to gain a business advantage. This does not require that a corrupt act succeed in its purpose. The mere offer of a corrupt payment can violate Applicable Laws. AECOM employees, representatives and Agents are prohibited from engaging in the following activities, in each case with the purpose of influencing or causing another person to influence any act or decision of a Government Official or foreign government to obtain or retaining business or to gain a business advantage: • Bribes - Giving or offering to give any money, gift or anything of value to any Government Official. • Political or Charitable Contributions - Making contributions to political parties or Government Officials or charities designated by such officials. • Third-Party Payments - Giving or offering to give money, gifts or anything of value to a third party when there is knowledge that it will then be given or offered to a Government Official. "Knowledge" includes conscious disregard for the truth or deliberate ignorance. • Facilitating Payments—Giving or offering money to a government official to induce the official to perform their lawful duties. Examples include obtaining visas, exit stamps for passports, permits, tax refunds or other actions that the official is obligated to perform. The AECOM DOA prohibits such payments except to prevent imminent threat of physical harm or jeopardy. Any such payments must be reported to the Legal Department within five days of occurrence to avoid violating securities regulations. Permissible Payments There are a few types of payments that could be considered permissible. These include: 1. Payment considered legal under the written laws of the Government Official's country. It should be noted that very few countries have such laws and this would occur only rarely, if at all. Prior Legal Department review and approval are necessary for any such payments. 2. Payment for reasonable and bona fide expenditures incurred by or on behalf of a recipient and directly related to: • Promotion or demonstration of goods and services; or • Performance of the contract with a foreign government or an agency. • As these exceptions are strictly and narrowly focused, review and comply with the International Marketing Expenditures: Guidance and Request Form on the E&C site to obtain approval for such payments. Dealings with Agents/Partners AECOM must exercise caution in dealing with Agents or local partners. The primary risk of a violation of Applicable Laws remains in the activities of an Agent steeped in another culture, particularly in a country where illicit payments may be prevalent and payments or other activities in violation of Applicable Laws are often carried out through Agents. To minimize AECOM's exposure to violations of Applicable Laws when dealing with Agents, the following practices must be followed: Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 5 November 2012 16 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM • A thorough due diligence must be completed and documented under the direction of the Geography General Counsel [or other in house counsel] or the CECO before engaging an Agent/partner to carry out any actions on behalf of AECOM (see Attachment A for due diligence considerations). Particular attention should be paid to any"red flags" relating to such proposed Agency Agreement (see Attachment B). Refer to Due Diligence on the E&C site for further guidance. • All Agent agreements are required to be in writing and approved by the HUB prior to the engagement of such Agent, as required under our, AECOM Delegations of Authority Section 1.10(c). • Unless written approval is obtained from AECOM's Office of the General Counsel, the Template International Consultant Agreement specified by the Office of the General Counsel must be used. Refer to Due Diligence on the E&C site for further guidance. Nonnegotiable provisions include: - An acknowledgment by the Agent or partner of familiarity with the requirements of the Applicable Laws pertaining to such Agent's activities; - Covenant of future compliance with Applicable Laws; - Representations that no person affiliated with the Agent or partner is a Government Official who is in a position to influence decisions regarding the contemplated activities, and agreement to notify AECOM if any such person assumes such a position; - All payments to the Agent or partner must be for services legitimately rendered within the scope of their agreement; - Agreement that, with reasonable notice, AECOM may audit or cause to be audited the expenses and invoices of the Agent or partner; and - The right to terminate the agreement upon any violation of its terms and conditions. • No cash payments to and from Agents/partners should be allowed. • The Agent/partner should not be allowed to employ a "sub-agent", "sub-consultant", or "sub-contractor" without the prior written approval of AECOM. In addition, AECOM must review/approve of Agents/partners who are also providing subcontract services. Periodic Audits Periodic audits will be conducted by the Vice President of Internal Audit that may include, but not be limited to the following: • Whether the books and financial records are accurate and complete and in accordance with Applicable Laws; • Evaluating the terms, conditions, and amounts of commissions paid to foreign Agents and foreign sales representatives; • Assessing the reasonableness of commissions in light of the nature and extent of the services provided and when compared to other commissions paid for similar services in that country; • To assess whether Agents account precisely for any reimbursable expenses and the services they provide (including, where appropriate, the provision of receipts or invoices); • Investigating transfers or payments of large amounts of cash to Agents; • Performing payroll audits; • Ensuring that foreign Agents and sales representatives are operating under written contracts, and such Agents or representatives are not government officials; and • Assessing Agent contracts to ensure the contracts have not been inappropriately modified or changed in a manner that could lead to a violation of Applicable Laws. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 6 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 17 • Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM All AECOM employees and Agents should be prepared to cooperate fully with auditors. Disciplinary Procedures or Penalties Failure to adhere to the company's policies regarding Applicable Law matters may result in disciplinary measures against those employees. The severity of the disciplinary measures will vary depending on the degree of non-compliance. Discipline can range from receiving a warning or being required to attend additional training on Applicable Law compliance to termination of employment. Definitions Agents — Any sales, marketing or other agents, sponsors, advocates, representatives, marketing consultants, lobbyists, intermediaries, and other persons performing similar functions. Bribe — Making or offering of a payment or a gift of money or anything of value, if the payment or gift is to influence or cause another person to influence any act or decision to influence any act or decision of a Government Official to obtain or retain business or to gain a business advantage. Government Official — Any (A) officer or other employee of, or other person acting in an official capacity, whether paid or unpaid, on behalf of, any Government, including legislators, politicians, candidates for political office, and officials of political parties; (B) members of a royal family; and (C)such official's immediate family members, including in-laws. Government—Any(A) multi-lateral aid agency,,such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, or other public international institution; (B) national, state, municipal or other local government or any agency, instrumentality, subdivision, department, commission, or other entity of or within that government; or (C) state-owned or controlled business company, association, society, enterprise or other entity(e.g., a national oil company or national airline). Payments—Money, transfer of stock, bonds or any other property, the payment of expenses, the providing of services of any type, the assumption or forgiveness of any indebtedness, or any other transfer of goods, services, or intangibles that accrues to the benefit of the ultimate recipient or promotes his or her interest. • Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 7 November 2012 18 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy A=COM Attachment A Agent Due Diligence Considerations Business Check It is essential that AECOM undertake and document appropriate "due diligence" with specific attention to potential "red flags" before pursuing transactions or other business opportunities. If AECOM is considering doing business with an Agent or business partner, it should thoroughly check the business reputation and past conduct of such person or entity, and meticulously document all inquiries. Each due diligence contact or business check should result in a written report or file memorandum. "Agent" has the meaning set out in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy. The following are some of the steps AECOM should take in conducting a background check but refer to Due Diligence at the E&C site for more information: • Request the prospective Agent or party to provide a list of references, a professional resume, and a complete employment history; • Contact the party's references and former employers; • Contact the commercial attaché at the U.S. embassy or other appropriate country embassies or rep_resentatives of multilateral institutions in the country where the Agent or partner will be working and request all available information about the Agent or Partner; • Contact the commercial representative of the embassy of the foreign country in the US and request all available information about the Agent or Partner; • Utilize the services of an outside agency or consultancy to perform due diligence on the proposed Agent; • Utilize resources such as Dun & Bradstreet and the International Company Profile Program to obtain background reports on companies; and • Investigate the country's reputation for bribery, using databases such as Transparency International.2 Visit the E&C site to review the latest Transparency International Corruption Index standings. Contract AECOM should insist on using the Template International Consultant Agreement when contracting with an international agent/consultant and the "Compliance with Laws" section in that Template Agreement in every contract or other business agreement. The main purpose of such provisions is to inform Agents or business partners of the importance of the Applicable Laws, and to provide evidence of intent to comply with the Applicable Laws. Audit In certain circumstances, AECOM should consider conducting internal audits on the Agent's compliance with its agreement, including compliance with Applicable Laws. Information on Transparency International can be found at http://www.transparency.org. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 8 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 19 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM Local Counsel In certain circumstances, AECOM should consider obtaining or requiring the Agent or business partner to obtain an opinion letter from mutually agreed upon local counsel as to the legality of the proposed activities and transactions under the laws of the countries involved. • Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 9 November 2012 20 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy A cOM Attachment B Red Flags: Guidelines for Identifying Suspicious Business Transactions Introduction "Red Flags" are circumstances that may suggest a reason to know of an actual or proposed illegal payment by an AECOM employee or third party acting on behalf of the company, thus creating risk under Applicable Laws for AECOM and potential personal liability for its officers and employees. The presence of a red flag does not automatically disqualify a proposed transaction, but requires greater scrutiny and safeguards against a possible violation. In-house Counsel and the CECO should be notified and consulted as soon as possible if such circumstances arise. See the Anti-Corruption Checklist on the E&C site in addition to the below guidance. Agents When Agents are retained to assist AECOM in locating or facilitating international business opportunities, AECOM should perform thorough background checks of those involved, as more fully described in Attachment A. If an Agent's or business partner's sole qualification is the personal relationship with Government Officials rather than substantive expertise in the business area, this constitutes a red flag. AECOM must be especially cautious of Agents' efforts to use front companies to make payments to Government Officials [as defined in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy] and where AECOM is engaged in dealings with officials of companies in which a foreign Government has an ownership interest. These officials may be considered "Foreign Government Officials" under Applicable Laws. Requests or direction from a government or state owned client to use a particular technical or non-technical consultant also constitute a red flag. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Ethical Business Conduct Policy. Guarantees • AECOM should require Agents to sign written contracts prior to performing any services on its behalf or at the first opportunity thereafter to confirm that no improper payments are being made to Government Officials. An Agent's refusal to sign such an agreement initially[and,thereafter, to periodically certify compliance as a condition to receiving payment]constitutes a red flag. Middlemen AECOM should be wary of any situation in which multiple middlemen seem to be performing the same task. Contracts with Agents require AECOM's prior written approval of any subagents. Government Relationships Agents who have previously held Government positions or who have an ongoing relationship with a Government official should be carefully examined. AECOM should not employ an Agent who is a current Government Official. Additionally, payments to dummy corporations, spouses or relatives of such officials can result in liability and severe penalties. Third Parties The payment of fees or commissions through third parties or third countries is another warning sign of possible violations of Applicable Laws or money laundering statutes. While there may be legitimate accounting and financial reasons for directing payments to a foreign bank or to an entity other than the Agent, AECOM should investigate and satisfy itself as to such payment terms and the reason for them should be documented in detail. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 1 0 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 21 Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy A=COM Gifts and Entertainment of Non-US Government Officials or Commercial Clients Although some Applicable Laws permit the provision of gifts, marketing trips or entertainment to Government Officials, many prohibit them and such activities can carry substantial risks. Such actions must be reasonable in amount, offered only in connection with the promotion or demonstration of company services or capabilities or the performance of a contract with a foreign government, lawful under Applicable Laws and appropriate under the circumstances so as not to create an appearance of impropriety. Additionally the UKBA prohibits gifts to and entertainment of commercial clients if the intent is to influence them to take improper actions. Check Gifts & Entertainment on the E&C site for detailed guidance and access to regional gifts and entertainment policies. Country Certain regions of the world appear more prone to violations of Applicable Laws than others. In places where the standard costs of doing business are perceived to include bribes, pay-offs, and "gifts" to foreign officials or their agents, AECOM should take extra care to ensure compliance with Applicable Laws. Unless obtaining advance approval from AECOM General Counsel (or designee) we will not pursue business relationships in the following countries: North Korea, Iran, Cuba and the Sudan (excluding the Government of the Southern Sudan) or other entities and individuals on U.S. and international sanctions list. Sanctions Programs on the E&C webpage contains updated information on sanctioned parties and a link to the company's screening tool which must be used to ensure compliance. Opportunities for significant business, coupled with widespread corruption and unclear distinctions between the public and private sectors, have made the following regions high-risk areas: Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, China, and parts of Southeast Asia. Commissions AECOM should perform careful research on the terms, conditions, and amounts of commissions paid to Agents and its relationship to the work performed. Many of the anti-corruption cases that have been prosecuted involved exorbitant commissions or fees not justified by the Agent's work or expertise. AECOM should ensure that the commissions are both reasonable in light of the nature and extent of the services provided and when compared to other commissions paid for similar services in that country. Unreasonably high commissions may signal a higher probability that money is being diverted to pay Government Officials. Any commission rate in excess of 10% (including subcontracts and all fee arrangements) would constitute a red flag and would require due diligence and/or mitigation. However, commission rates less than 10% may not be reasonable in a particular country given the nature and extent of services provided. Situations where the amount of payment is linked to the value of the anticipated sale or contract to be awarded merit extra attention. Agents should be required to account precisely for their expenses and the services they provide. Cash Payments One of the most obvious warning signs is the transfer of cash. Cash payments raise questions under both the accounting and anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA and other Applicable Laws. AECOM's failure to investigate cash payments to Agents could result in charges of liability on a "conscious avoidance" theory. It also may,trigger reporting obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering provisions. As a result, AECOM's general policy is to prohibit cash payments to Agents or other third parties. Bonuses, Reimbursements, and other Payments AECOM should closely monitor and carefully document any large payment to Agents or, as applicable, their employees. Large bonus payments, subcontract awards on a non-competitive basis or reimbursements for unusually high entertainment, advertising, or other administrative expenses may be used as a device to mask illegal payments to Government Officials. This Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 11 November 20/2 22 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH j Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy AECOM warning also encompasses advance payments made before any work has begun, which may be to help ensure award of a contract or continuance of a business relationship or after the fact "award fee." AECOM should also be wary of"after-sales service fees,"which were the subject of a recent enforcement action and found to constitute kickback payments prohibited under the Applicable Laws. Payroll Fraud Much like large cash payments, the presence on AECOM's payroll of persons who are relatives or associates of Government Officials can raise serious compliance concerns, particularly if such person's qualifications or work product are not bona fide. Secrecy AECOM should be wary of any situation in which potential Agents or partners seem reluctant either to explain fully the nature of a proposed activity or transaction, or to provide clear answers to routine commercial or technical questions. Likewise, AECOM should be wary of Agents who request unusual or excessive confidentiality or secrecy regarding a transaction. The same applies with Agents, partners or AECOM employees requesting or pressuring employees to account for transactions in an inaccurate, covert, deceptive or otherwise misleading manner. Conscious disregard of or failure to ask questions regarding questionable actions or proposals of an Agent or partner can result in personal liability for AECOM executives and responsible employees. Research AECOM personnel should keep abreast of developments outside their home country in which such personnel's operations conduct business. Publicly reported cases of bribery, pay-offs, and public corruption should prompt a careful review of AECOM's operations and compliance program in that country or region. • Competitor Violations If AECOM learns that its competitors (especially competitors not subject to the Applicable Laws) are involved in bribery, pay-offs, or other activities that may violate the Applicable Laws, AECOM should immediately conduct a careful investigation of its operations, or accelerate its usual training schedule to remind employees of AECOM's standards, expectations, and responsibilities. In a difficult competitive environment, employees may learn of a competitor's tactics and may be tempted to follow suit to avoid falling behind. Global Ethical Business Conduct Policy 12 November 2012 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 23 1 .3 Vinimum Qualifications Our team, our local experience, and our approach focused on assisting the City and its staff with professional architectural and engineering services will exceed the expectations described in your RFQ. The AECOM team meets and exceeds the minimum requirements,and more importantly,provides significant advantages to Miami Beach which are critical to delivering projects under this contract.The table below,which addresses Appendix C and Section 0200 of the RFQ,illustrates our qualifications. Minimum Requirements Benefit to Miami Beach Tab Cl. Proposers Experience, Architects & Engineers Experience, and Firm & Staff Licensure AECOM has assembled a team of professionals experienced in providing Landscape Architecture services.The Tab 2 i) Proposer must have a industry's and region's top talent providing global expertise minimum of five years Items 2.1 & and local knowledge are available and committed to the experience 2.2 City.The table on the next page shows all of our team members'years of relevant experience. Over 90 years working in Coral Gables,and successful ii) Proposer must delivery of Miami Beach projects,AECOM has valuable Tab 2 submit at least five lessons learned which will lead to efficient execution of Items 2.1 & relevant projects your project. Detailed project experience and references for 2.2 landscape architecture related projects are included in this Tab 2. A licensed team Miami Beach can rely on to provide iii) Firm &Staff best practices in landscape architecture,design, public Tab 1 outreach,construction documents, park planning and Item 1.3 Licensure water use/irrigation services. AECOM's corporate licenses and staff member licenses are included in Tab 1. As detailed in our Approach and Methodology section, 02. Scope oT`/eo AECOM understands the City of Miami Beach and its desire Tab 3 Require to maintain Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an "As-Needed Basis" 24 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH '•ofessiora.A,cmtectura:and E^.gi'1ee•i1g Services AECOM Our Team is comprised of local and national experts who have a depth of knowledge,diverse disciplines and experience providing the requested professional services needed for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services. TEAM MEMBER YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AECOM is certified Greg Ault Role: Principal-in-Charge/Planner 32 to work in the State Gustavo Santana,MLA 11 Role: Project Manager/Planner of Florida and also Lauren Swan,MLA 3 professionally licensed Role: Landscape Designer/Public Outreach • Michael Brown,RLA 15 in the following Role: Landscape Architect/Designer/Planner Andrew Sheppard,RLA,LEED AP 14 disciplines: Role: Landscape Architect/Designer Thomas J.McMacken,Jr.,RLA Role: Landscape Architect/Construction Documents 37 State of Florida Department of Galen Pugh,RLA,AICP 25 State Corporation No: Role: Landscape Architect/Construction Documents/Planner F95000004014 Hannah Plate 1.5 Role: Landscape Designer/Construction Documents Nicholas Kuhn,RLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: Role: Park Planner 14 State of Florida Board of Drew Crumpton 1 Landscape Architecture No: Role: Park Planner LC26000395 Dale Morehouse,CID,CLIA 20 Role: Water Use/Irrigation Jason Bird Role: Water Use/Irrigation 15 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH J-ofessional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 25 State of Department of State I certify from the records of this office that AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. is a California corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on August 21, 1995. The document number of this corporation is F95000004014. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on April 30, 2014, and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Sixth day of June,2014 1 -0„ /- s- . ; Secretary of State sly- Authentication ID:CU0954435966 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this ID,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.sunbiz.org/certauthver.html 26 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?rofessional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 11�� BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0 !i ;•❑ LICENSE NUMBER f'}+ •' I •� LC26000395 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS • , 1,J o+ Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑ x Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1050 LOS ANGELES CA 90071 VIVA F[O QA ISSUED. 11112/2013 SEQ# L1311120001163 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ❑ : • 0 BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LICENSE NUMBER LA0001193 . The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT . ° Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑• Under Me provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 MCMACKEN,THOMAS J JR 120 N ORANGE AVE ORLANDO FL 32801 �., VIVA RA MA RICK SCOTT ISSUED 09/24/2013 SEQ# L1309240001388 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY RICK SCOTT.GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION I` BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0 ,'}t0 LICENSE NUMBER `.•. �j; •T. LA6665962 I •The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1'�� ' Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 • j.'• 5• Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date NOV 30.2015 BROWN MICHAEL JASON 6676 LAKE PEMBROKE PLACE ORLANDO FL 32829 VIVA MIUA OVA ISSUED: 01/112014 SEQ/ L1401130000844 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ f ❑ •LICENSE NUMBER } LA6666767 r r�1r •• The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT P+ E Named below HAS REGISTERED ❑ 7 : A•°. • Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 SHEPPARD,ANDREW BRIAN 9409 WHISPERING MEADOWS LN ORLANDO FL 32825 VIVA IIVViC4 ISSUED 11/2012013 SEC)# L1311200001074 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?-ofessional Architectural and Engineering Services STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION 0 144. 0 BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1' 1•-• LICENSE NUMBER I i 4 LA0001522 .. 1 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 'r. � Named below HAS REGISTERED 0 d y Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30,2015 PUGH,GALEN J 3509 JENNIE JEWEL PLACE ORLANDO FL 32806 {INlda RICK SCOTT ISSUED: 09112/2013 SEQ# L1309120001898 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ❑ ...-4:4;:4;P:i 0 LICENSE NUMBER LA8667085 'rat'p The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Named below HAS REGISTERED . 'It:bra Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: NOV 30.2015 KUHN,NICHOLAS DAVID.:A.-.. 1407 GOVERNORS CT. = `°"" ` """°� NW, RALEIGH NC 27604 VIII FIUIIA ISSUED: 12/23/2013 SEQ# L1312230000721 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW The American Institute of Certified Planners The Professional Institute of the American Planning Association hereby qualifies Galen. J. Pugh as a member with all the benefits of a Certified Planner and responsibility to the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Certified Planner Number.019833 December 29.2004 00,L.e paw PRESIDENT - FEQ1VE DIRECTOR 28 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM '- s s - t � . r _". :: . . .-r ---I.`,'Fa • a-• nMi Ia • • ♦ i aftls 7! • • • • • f 1. f\, • • " ' 1.,"r"lip,,,,, i tt, _1 p E. THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION I ' " :O Certifies That On \ •w Se tember 5, 2001 ' ' September `` w g .'‘,.-). g Dale` C. Morehouse - - - ,,,-' - , , , ,,44*Twet , ;,, 4_ : Successfully Completed d MI The Necessary Requirements �, s Arid Shotldlien efort`h,Be Recognized As A < R N CERTIFIED COMMERCIAL Wijii DESIGNER IRRIGATION DESIGNE ; ON%‘.---,... '''',;:r iky ,., -,,, <, ., , „.. , .,), , , ....,.., , , , , . . _ „......., „....----------,----,,,L , ,,„.,,,i,„_, _ , 1 o I C y yy � ,,,,,,,,.‘„,,.,„,,..,,„,,,,„,,,,,„„,„,„„,,,,...„:,,y,,,,,,,,,,, Chair,C ertif ication B oar d ° iatl Nf•iRN xa ii Mira tl • i •.::..•12• ♦ a •_• • ■ • : �; ' w t w 4 u41 lt ltt ','11.4 ' t".. * _It./41:1:•'+4,114%.,, ,...1/*.' '4-, /, 1:/' 1; ' 't•--4 el*aiteicsii--4 0444.thoy*', 11191;1-'.,-,--'-' ': ,*fr:., ' 7,Ai: ti fir ,2 a. .: .. r .• .,> 7t,:x ?,sWmr'.; a,.f.....:..',7 �'rl--....... e,','''s-aa •�"`"6. ».....:.... ♦ , • •. ♦ • s ♦ i ,.,-.., •;1.., /• • • •..• • • • • • • r THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION ;; Certifies That On 7 Apra'2 6 2006 b . 3 ., I. x,H Dal * Morehouse i F ,I '' idol .Number: 002647 • �, , ,sw „ ; Successfully C ,' ; . "• -cess -f •equtrements �. p , . And Wu d . 4. .d A 4` - CERTIFIED R TtO E I . ' GOLF , ,r- f f ;��,fit N'"r � (I'die � , t• ; ,..., , , \\ , . , . , t I . ., Ras nf, ��,,, '..R + p Vk'';','",4,1 J.. r 4" 4� !.•z.., »•dw {" u sy ww;b".r •l+1 �'n+' • kr" ." .aH a•x.s, -,`',/,,- f+ 4 , % 4 1 x t 'I y AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH =,ofessional Architectural and Engineering Services 29 THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION Certifies that on November 1, 1998 Dale C. Morehouse Successfully Completed Alt The P Iecess ements And Should len+ , e t F'g Recognized As At-Willie-4'1' RESIDENTIAL IRRIGATION DESIGNER - '__If .____&e:3''e -- Chairman,Certification Board THE IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION on J 'y1719 • More ouse . , d. LANDSC PE IRRIGATIO AUDITOR ..... =.4--- 0,,... chaimna,►,Certification 3D CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS Member ISA, AFNN, FNGLA /Certified Arborist Environmental Landscape Construction / Management Natural Areas Restoration,Invasive Plant Eradication,Mitigation,Aquatic Management 28905 SW 162 Ave.Homestead,FL.33033-2200 Tel 305-245-1722 Fax 305-246-1379 mixdgreens@bellsouth.net Michael Gnaegy/Certifications/Affiliations/Licenses Certifications—Membership - ISA-FNGLA-FDACS - AFNN- (University of Florida IFAS Extension /Miami Dade County * US Army 1970 Over Seas Tour ETS 1974 * Certified Veteran Owned Company * Mix'd Greens, Inc. operation of Business for over thirty seven years (Established 1977) * Certified: ISA Arborist(FL#0378)—International Arborist Association (#15625) *Certified: FDACS License Public Right-Of-Way Herbicide Application, Restricted Aquatics: License (CM 13479) & Aerial Applicator on Staff(Department of Agriculture And Consumer Services)(Natural Areas Management Practices) * Miami Dade County Horticultural Advisory Committee 2008-2014 * Certification: Horticulture-Landscape-Maintenance from University of Florida IFAS /Miami Dade Cooperative Extension * Certified in DERM - BPM (Best Management Practice) University of Florida FDACS / Miami Dade Cooperative Extension * Certified: Federal HUB Zone Business Certification * Miami Dade County Small Business Minority Certification#15467 * Miami Dade County IFAS Horticultural Advisory Committee 2005 -2014 * FDACS Certificate of Nursery Registration USDA #47219769 * FDACS License as Bonded Dealer in Agricultural Products USDA * Member Florida Association of Native Nurseries (FANN formerly known as AFNN) * Member Florida Nursery, Growers& Landscape Association (FNGLA) * FNGLA Board Director, Dade County (Past 2006—2013) * Dade County Vendor/Contractor>25 Years * Dade County Adopt-A-Tree Grower& Transportation projects 2002 to 2009 * Dade County Landscaper Permit(DSWM Permit Section) * Wildlife& Environmental Training (FPL nuclear facility"Turkey Point") * Mix'd Greens Personnel are all OSHA trained (10 - 30 hours+) relative to services. * Over Thirty Seven Years of Experience in Landscape—Production—Environmental— Remediation/Maintenance & Horticultural Industries since (1977) Mick Gnaegy ISA FL #0378 CM#13479 Mix'd Greens, Inc. 28905 SW 162 Ave Homestead, Florida 33033-2200 Mobile: 305 345 6108 Office: 305 245 1722 Fax: 305 246 1379 Email: mixdgreens(abellsouth.net www.MixdGreens.Com AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 31 : ( — N) I -,)) l' /(--- ,),' tfnie,ACZ4:0/Zed YOCZ4 ? Siff,hetzelare if ---) . ___ 11; MichaelJ. Gnaegy { ;1 . I i's . G�et FC., rt`inliiva I� r acvit� :1uare�,�u�s �ryZled de ie9rure�rtrr!.t id de .S�r j �� : 4 eard 1 44 fillernaieenal,-o t 1.SSTriwuxsdi ee, `"� t, al ve /leaned !e e s may tkzed as a/a f '.k�l. Wearied driered i -,;.----..-:) ,.„..!tr' ' -"',,„, i ('II ))I r 11 ' i„, ' i -›"S-1;;/1/ ef=7:4 ,.,':-.', 1 -,4:, , N\ jlJa" ,.� i f4IO,,aiiMQ/JMaIujo 9'.MVI.A,(Wlere• , y' ll I�i f FL-0378A 12131/04 )ate. ' '‘,Ili ill; Ili '., A 1 t' . ter-A.'\ -----: '',' ..- " -. _ 4 1 j '.:._.. a.._ � - Wes..�, ,,la d - l �,f �1 b� I 1 �e r--14 T - .. �! !fie... "iE Ir �..._.. d�N.. .� • o �, i k Certificate of C .. /11 This certifies that " ` s'`j %/ `' ,,1> '' r' Michael G. Gnaegy ''i ,,.viiiiii has successfully completed the " ., ‘,,,Z,/,.. Construction Safety & Health Safety Training 'fi,i r OSHA 30-hours • * . .1 r:vt November 14, 2011 P ,, �;' ,i ,. Miami, Florida '�, 0 4 i 1 0 it,, ' c' Risk Control Consultants f� Orfi 1 orrego 11 i s Instructor ,, ¢1 it -,,,,x ‘, g` r'.......... .Ir a.". ` `\i. mow'_ .I its/ �. w a ;y `- .. "a.,, i_ ,,:1\ 32 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM .{�.a.. .e?.., -.+a._a-•., �S .3-.. .:..i.._'>! a..`; ,,�- ...w �.... r.:« .(�.. ...+ .i('. . � � � �$�'� a itiltIti � nv� f p° r' x � �x �. .>r s ,, :.. sn � � � - .t'+ ,- "} 4 l 3 'S r Y '{�'' v' i2 'r ro.4'.1. #•r �,1; ',, r .74:,1,,a� 4 ' ¢''s.1 :`„,"t#.,r..r r'..a'„a a s a'� e sx r s s v ',.. 1 t:',r9 �} t ,♦t,,.. > �,�! ; t,,_ x.�;r` � '4'ri ���.� °'�.� aw t *�`r ., tta^"�.�",..�.F,,,�,- 4, s, $ 1 rte. 1.,,i lY � 3 !t�' S a r•}L �_: r' "�L;� ''f,rr v ` � 11' S!IA, •`=i � � A. i ;4-if' -T. .:,-,,.. ,tift:sF:tif.0, -'p 4 4!I-f'-', ,-, c 4:,-"!: ,,' '',' ',t‘, ' ,' . ',- ,-, .*-,.0.1` '4 1 ,, `1. [ e @ a j', , :_ I. . ,,,-/r ,i t 3 ' .. t , 1� gi 1 4 ° Y • k,l mi)cio,eacens,< .T s t .':* !r % .k. , R• ?` \r r,• c , y ;-4 is a member of the IT Florida Nursery, Growers & Landscape Association -,,,-.7N, r through June 30, 2015 -z I , ,4 ,• .l 1 z - -A' ) -- Member in good } standing since 1995 . Ben Bonnkl;Execrative Vie President FLORIDA NURSERY.GROWERS ` 4 . AND LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION r' r'-. Lead-ng Hondas Green Industry - i,...-: .�. ..,�,,..,.., w"7 • . -r. ... ,.4r; r'7- �`-c-f,, -^�r�- -±-^Y, ...ter'. -7, ,.7r_ -r.y✓: -.'..c.-.„ ''''.03:- `•• ,.,,,�,.i+,1!" �.�--rte\4:,,:\,.$4t•r• ' i'0;00 f'`9%.Cl,rw.,` +. i iii .,;�; \\ j�'} rr ;�\1,:.i , r '-* r ,,, y 1-' .'\ rr,,rI \ .. -�4.4.1-14--i- r- _ r .roc-i' I s"-, �•(-rr.-r ---y. -*' #0/1034 'A UFIIFAS -_ ' - `' i • • • • UNIVERSITY of FLORIDA '..° . r'- Certificate of Training ,\ ,_ ��. 2 GV13170-2 Best Management jives _ Certificate# Honda Gxee i ', GV13170 °° ,• r.. r" r -�- 4 r r i,,4 Trainee ID a � � i , ' is+ Thy 4 •.� ,, . , 1� .,- s a •es that �� ` ' d #M ., `,.,-.,- m<,, `s r 9 �'p , -, F,. 'ti p �" j^s. has successful , .-:._ T ✓ d a s �✓w1 aCA 4a �I'v s�� 3 " ��. r tY3�'ned through �` 1 the Green Indus ,:l a i.fr i Al ,,4_ -.'; . 41 t;,,a eloped by the Florida De�. i ,. f .k iA Y+4h^t T �. r 7r • a nip ers�t of r*, Floc Institute Food'° S ences• • t2Y'- H.Mayer 5/2$/22 014 i !/ _r Issuer Instructor Date of Class D 'rogram Administrator fR_.r. Not valid without seal •-% „ >.1 ��. K, 1 e-'I' 40. '\\,\ ,- 4. 1 ` 1,, ' 1 d s-k• , /�,do. 'l IA, c' • ,, � //.. '`f { � � t", '% � �`;i.', r �',` err � '.� AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitectural and Engineering Services 33 I i • \ ----..,.. 0: •--• .-' . - . -.••., t i: • •••••••• ....,. • -..._ ..• '' . ' /fp/ • ••, .• . --•., r ,,.i.... _/;....:....4../...' •11',-/. . :1.--„,-+...4ti .. "...''...:?',--'. ...■ 1'.. • i.,Irrii zi....."` ""...r... :,.• -, --....,... .• ., - .. `■ , ‘. ' •_./' , .- , \1•,".'t ,4--,,,,,,,,,- ,te. Experience &:.,- i .,•• , .. _ Qualifications , . —_,..... . ... .. .:,.t, ..,• , _....... ..„...., •• ..... ,... . .•. • . . , .,,,,.. .... .-.... ,--7--,.•:. —I a ••.• • . _ ,fr!. .. . : • •,./ /1/4\ , '• tluz -•• ' r r = •\ .P.-"'"-...,,,,,...%•__..-----•'• . ,Ii■-- CC • • N3 .., . ... imiir i I . . ' \ ..' ti "\\ •, i . .. , . . .. i • , • „,.• . E 1 1 ' ' ' • ''' • . ;7.- . .•.!... ., p . .• . . • ,- 1 (D • 1.4, I— ,..,.....•,, -- "- . . , , ■, ........ , • (Di .,..• ....„ ... . • ..• -;* \,, .1-.. . r ... ,„•-•.-"-.H, ' . .- , C.* f •-•V: _•'',_ • ' j. ' . -•?;,,* . .e.‘f.,,,,,.,:\ ,, „N., - . • ,. -13)10; • ,\• cD SZ0 ‘*•' • k 1'14 ...chi-. ' ' 41;1, ••Nei' •.::IIP Ns. ' \•,, .: - ...• ‘• N.• N., - ' ''K.:, . ' \- iiti;, . 4- N,,ct,".-.....• - -,. .• .4.N., '..: , ' , " ,, ..,,,, 0 . •S'.."'' C .,, .. • 0.‘"7 • - •-•sttt...' . ' '' - , cn _'---. , — as '' lilt CO ,,, . :1441 •-i• . - .. . .0 . ■• ■ ,1*--, - ..,4-0 . ri•14 't • ,• • - 0 , I '' 1 F.... . .„..... .: •_. • \,..4.,, .,. , , .„, I D cn ;•i,, ',, . . . ' ,•\ ., ,,,,..Ir.'iiii,474 4-., ,.• it ., , ik, s , • , ,, ,p'• , -„,__ ..• . . -..• 4 ' • . ,,,, . • . A. - :1144: \S:1 \"'s , .4 i '..' • • . •.,•,• • ' . . . ... \ •:•$. 1 \ • ''..., • '',•'-'' ,,,y,...^.-.'.`-'Ll - ' T,,_•.•)',,-.,', ii,...': yrri,i0„,..0,----'... •\\\,. ‘,„11--•;k-N.\ 'I.- ._ • , . ,.,;.. • 1 - I .'-• - \, s .. --■ . ••. .. A * ,,'",Vo‘\ '. . ,---- ---.• f . • 3 k......„ italh. ' It." /,',;:\. ,, ...• • 'N. , , t ,N . I N •••,_,•:-',•....,:•.,•--•-•,, *- ',48, '.., ' •t--•/41.. '',...,\,, '‘,. . -01' • \4 r III. : - - .:- .. , • .. ` •frii- ' v' • V •Ii - - .4.! •,' .If ..., id ,,,' • i . , st ., ,. A a' • l'... ,.. . . ,.,,, -... . .., . , -• • — , 1. 4 • ,,..: • ,i1: . . ..i.....4.,...e.^....V . - , : •. - . -I.' I) • ' Y • WIN IA M., •.-.;:r...7.4417 ... ••• . • e. • . , .--..e ..• .- 4. • . . • . , ,, _,.....„ -7 '' •. • .,. vigrw.,tt,tiw.I ,-- / - liti i .- ._ -milumm.... 110." '•••‘• •• . . .1 Ai' it:-.... -- ' • . ._ . , ,.„„ . ,,,—.444...:;300, 4404, ',---4'' , -.1. , • . . , . . .. . , ,: ... .•.. . . .. .. . . • . . • . • ' : ,' ) ''''.-.•''''''''.,__;',:,,7.,:,'--',..:,&•,:-Zik.Z.?t,ff. , ' • - • •,a* .,. •- • • ,• • . . , • ■ , • , i . • • : ,_• ..•_ • . , I . * • .0- I• - • ' s • . s • • . .. . * - ' - • - • ••" •• .' . ,. , • •••• . .. .. • . i.•'. .• • • i • • •. .• • • • • . • • ' ••• . • . • • • • . 4 • • • ' • ••• ; • '• j . , . .. o . . , • •. • •S,s, \ • • •• . . • • • •. . • . . - • • . , , • ..,,3,,•',,. • •i•WA''''••,.-2.1".2. 0•0••4;•410•4•04.1i4aSI• •••• ';;••.:,, •• ' ...:•••••7':'•■•,.,, 1 . 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm & Qualifications 2.2 of Proposer Team (Architects & Engineers) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I — CONTRACT SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION Professional Architectural&Engineering Services in Specialized Categories on an"As-Needed Basis" GROUP A-Architecture,Landscape 2 ._:, c'-ATONOR'- O E December 2,2014 RFQ 2014-346-YG B. ARCHITECT--ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT Greg Ault, Principal-in-Charge NAM AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 305.604.5878 305.447.3580 greg.ault @aecom.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors) ;Check) z z oa r > r m a U)- 9. Firm Name 10.Address 11. Rote in this Contract AECOM Technical 800 Douglas Entrance Landscape Architecture, Public Outreach, Services,Inc. North Tower, 2nd Floor Design,Construction Documents, Park a. V Coral Gables, FL 33134 Planning,Water Use/Irrigation [/]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Mix'd Greens,Inc. r28905 SW 162 Avenue Certified Arborist Mix'd Greens Homestead, FL 33033-220 b. ✓ Environmental, Inc. [ ]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE [✓I CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. [✓I CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. [✓]CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM t✓](Attached) AU'40R:ZED OR_OCA_RE ROOUCT'ON MANDATORY USE::ATE 3=;ORM1 3 2004 -:")PM 330*2004, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PofessionaLArchitecturaL and Engineering Services 37 Organizational Chart 1111 MIAMI BEACH PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Greg Ault PROJECT MANAGER Gustavo Santana,MLA PUBLIC OUTREACH/ DESIGN CONSTRUCTION COMMUNITY COORDINATION DOCUMENTS Greg Ault Gustavo Santana,MLA Thomas J.McMacken,Jr.,RLA Gustavo Santana,MLA Michael Brown,RLA Galen Pugh,RLA Lauren Swan,MLA Andrew Sheppard, RLA,LEED Hannah Plate Lauren Swan,MLA PARK WATER USE/ CERTIFIED PLANNING IRRIGATION ARBORIST Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Dale Morehouse,RLA Michael Gnaegy* Drew Crumpton Jason Bird All staff are AECOM unless noted below: *Mix'd Greens,Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc. 330 1.30174' 38 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Greg Ault Principal-in-Charge 32 21 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BS, Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, 1978 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc) Mr.Ault's career encompasses 32 years of international experience as a senior planner,landscape architect,and project manager.His work with large-scale,complex,mixed-use urban projects has focused on the conceptual stages of retail,office and residential planning.Presentations include: "Transformative Landscapes in the Global Fabric,"Keynote Speaker,Landscape Architecture National Student Workshop,2012 and"Campus Planning Precedents-National and International Case Studies,"Speaker,Florida International University,2011.Awards include:APA Honor Award,NAS Patauxent River Vision Plan,2011 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park RO ESS ONa-SERVICES CONSTRUCT'ON(If Applicable) Miami Beach,FL 2014 N/A a. - - .. - -- - _ _ El °necK f project 7erform8d Mth)Ur.oflt iirT Principal-in-Charge. Master planning,stakeholder facilitation and project visioning for an oceanfront 2.5 acre park on 76th Street and Collins Avenue.This remnant open space in a City Historic District offers the City and Citizens a unique opportunity to create public focal point on one of the highest points in the Beach proper. Project Cost: $67,935(design), $4,610,000(estimated construction) (1)T}TLE.A,ND LOCATION..(City and.State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park and Parking Garage 'ROFESS:ONA_SER';`C_S CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable' Sunny Isles Beach,FL 2007 2011 b. ;31 3R E= SCRiuT ON Sr. of,c,ae.s:: c.st.etc., 2 S: C POLE i El C heck if Jroject performed with carr ent firm • Principal-in-Charge.Landscape,hardscape,and site planning design and construction administration services for a 4 acre urban park with a public performance stage,playground,fountains,multi-use field,dog run,and a 4-level parking garage. Project Cost:$10.3 Million, Project Size: 175,000 SF. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ingraham Park PROFESSIONAL SERV'CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2012 2014 :3)SR'EF CESCR!?r ON;3riet Scone.size,cost etc. AND Si:' _ El Check if oroiect performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge.Landscape,hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park with an outdoor exercise area,civic scale fountain and trellis to create a southern gateway to Coral Gables. Project Cost:$1.2 Million. to TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Pine Park Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) - Pinecrest,FL 2013 N/A 3 3 _- =5,'-- .'v 3�'er scope.size.cost,etc.,ANC SPEC='C.ROL= d. l] Check if project performed with current firm Principal-in-Charge. Project visioning and overall 20 year master planning,landscape design and construction costing services for an important neighborhood park and tennis center in a residential neighborhood.The project includes the successful engagement of the surrounding neighbors and concerned residents to create a design partnership between the constituency,the Village and the design team.Project Cost:$1.5 Million II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing . N/A 3'3R" CESC4'o"ON,3ref score.size.cost.etc.!AND S?50=C POLE Q Check if droject performed wit',,,went firm Principal-in-Charge for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks, downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) --------- 3rANDA,1J 701M 930;1.2004., AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architecturat and Engineering Services 39 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Gustavo Santana, MLA Project Manager 11 11 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture,School of Architecture, Florida International University,Cum Laude, 2002 Bachelor of Design in Plannerural Studies,School of Architecture, Florida International University,Cum Laude, 1999 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Santana is a motivated and resourceful designer and project manager who has been extensively involved in master planning,site and detail design,construction administration on a variety of large and small scale projects including commercial,residential,educational,riverwalk and streetscape design.He has worked closely in providing clients with community and campus master plans,utilizing a full range of planning and design resources to manage change and improve quality of life. Awards include:Award of Merit,ASLA Florida Chapter,2005(Madie Ives Elementary School Butterfly Garden) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park "PC3E33 ov,a:_SEPV CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami Beach,FL 2014 N/A ES,C,R:"T ON of 3Op0e.size.;ost CO t ..!AND ROLE El Check If::r.je;:t performed with c:or-eat firm a. Project Manager. Landscape,hardscape,lighting, master planning design,and community workshop services for the last oceanfront,undeveloped 2.5 acre park with proposed pedestrian paths,botanical garden like features,bocce court, and sand volleyball courts to create a park that is in keeping with the natural and urban landscape. Project Cost: $67,935 (design),$4,610,000(estimated construction) (I)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design&Streetscape PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if Applicable) Improvements,Miami Beach,FL 2005 2009 b. :3)3RiE:=DESCR P ION 3r,ef _:sr •. . ❑ check oroje ^o,mad rr-h o en.. Landscape Planner. AECOM prepared urban design and streetscape plans consisting of new planting(such as native grasses,dune vegetation,specimen palms,and shade trees);new sidewalks;a bikeway;street furniture;new curbs; bollards and benches;a pedestrian plaza with specialty paving,coral stone feature walls,showers,foot washers,and drinking fountains;and milled and resurfaced street pavement,as well as pedestrian-scale lighting.Project Cost:$158,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Beachwalk II PROFESSIONAL SERV,CES 0NSTR',;. CN FapcIi.a Pie: . Miami Beach,FL Ongoing 2014(Phase 1) 3`3R;__ _o: =7 ON 3 3__ C 0 Check If orolect performed with.urrent firm Project Manager. Landscape and hardscape design of a 5 city block pedestrian corridor extension of the Atlantic Greenway Corridor in South Beach,extends North/South,behind the existing barrier dune system and provides integrated connections to the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent beach. Special consideration was given to existing dune and native plant material locations as well as beach views from adjacent hotels and condominiums. Project Cost:$83,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park and Parking Garage PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Sunny Isles Beach,FL 2007 2011 d. 3'.3R'E'OESOR' 0`i ? ar 3.')C,?.•31Z3, AN' ❑ Dheck if prole.,performed wit*,our-=nt firm Landscape Planner.Landscape,hardscape,and site planning design and construction administration services for a 4 acre urban park with a public performance stage,playground,fountains,multi-use field,dog run,and a 4-level parking garage. Project Cost:$10.3 Million, Project Size: 175,000 SF. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ingraham Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicabl ) Coral Gables,FL 2012 2014 e. ;31 33 33 03303 o 03 3,35 I,_,.3:3. AND 3T0.=0 POLE X IF a ❑ Check orola. performed wrtn 7ur•eot firm Landscape Planner. Landscape, hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park with an outdoor exercise area,civic scale fountain and trellis to create a southern gateway to Coral Gables.Project Cost:$1.2 Million. 330 ' 2004. 40 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Designer/Public ='-'- b V‘,7-1 7.;','4j-'4f``,,' Lauren Swan, MLA Outreach 3 1 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Coral Gables, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture,SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry in conjunction with Syracuse University, 2010 Bachelor of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 Associate of Science in Horticulture,Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, 2003 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Ms.Swan is an experienced landscape planner with a background in landscape architecture and urban planning.She has diverse experience in community design,master planning,streetscapes,site and detail design as well as project management for both public and private sector clients. As the landscape planner for the City of Pembroke Pines,she rewrote the landscape code,wrote several code of ordinance resolutions,drafted comprehensive plan amendments for green initiatives as well as the creation gateway and open space plans.While with the City,Ms.Swan also received a grant for implementation of her proposed streetscape design. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park »�__»;:`,A_3=R`,:Es ^ISTR'J'TON'If4oa(icahle' Miami Beach,FL 2014 N/A a. :;��,� _-, r 3--r i.N ~r, Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting, master planning design,and community workshop services for the last oceanfront,undeveloped 2.5 acre park with proposed pedestrian paths,botanical garden like features,bocce court, and sand volleyball courts to create a park that is in keeping with the natural and urban landscape. Project Cost: $67,935 (design),$4,610,000(estimated construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Alhambra Park RROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) • Coral Gables,FL 2014 2015 b. 3)3R'=-JESCR,T CN 3r r C,JO..S?. _.;St AND SPEC-'C?'O,__ ❑ _ ':{ i:)f7!e"'? �rT„ 'N"'r�JrBnt flfT Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting, master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$34,240(design),$300,000(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Maggiore Park 'RC=_SS:c iA_S R' CES CONSTRUCTION(if Applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2014 2015 E n“1,,J'_.,t ire, Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,construction services and public outreach for a community park reminiscent of a Chinese Garden located in the city's Chinese Village Project Cost:$34,240(design), $300,000(construction) . (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Kingsbay Community Park wC=ESSiOr,A'-SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Coral Gables,FL 2014 2015 d. 3:ER'E SCR,''ON'3'-' t e.41 :B3t AND PO_c � 23 Q ..,,a::R,T:7 r.'.12C:porfOfined with::'J f"ani it"rn. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,site planning design,public outreach,and construction administration services for a linear park and pedestrian plaza located along the water's edge. Project Cost:$64,000(design),$450,000(construction) I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State)- (2)YEAR COMPLETED Tamarac Parks,Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan '40,E33:CNA...SERV:C_S CONSTRUCTION:IfAoolicable: Tamarac,FL Ongoing N/A ❑ ,ha:;c r.;,Die:t.�-r)r .1 with Current firm Landscape Planner. Parks,recreation and open space masterplan that identifies existing conditions,needs assessments, planning framework and recommendations based on input from city staff and civic engagement. Project Cost: $145,000 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 41 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Michael Brown, RLA Landscape Architect/Designer 15 9 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture,Colorado State University, 1999 Registered Landscape Architect, FL#6666962 Landscape Architecture Study Abroad, 1998 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc) Mr.Brown has managed over 30+projects in his 10+years as a Landscape Architect in both Washington and Florida.Mr.Brown is experienced in site analysis,site planning,design documentation,hardscape,landscape design&construction,construction methods,bidding,permitting,and construction administration. Mr.Brown has special interest in sustainable infrastructure and often finds way to incorporate green design into projects in a cost effective manner. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED • St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan P40==_ss!ONA_SERVICES' CONSTRUCT,ON'If4paticable.i St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A a. Landscape Architect and Project Manager for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks,downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Kissimmee Lakefront Park -• _SS VNa_SEPV C_S CONSTRUCT'ON'If4pplicable) Kissimmee,FL 2014 2014 b. 3 _ _,3c, -3`i 3-_ 5 _-_.,klI.,>>_.._ _.E o Check if;role:r:ar`)rmed ratty current firm Landscape Planner. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$25 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and state) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Eustis Downtown Streetscapes uROhESSiONA.S_Rh C_S CONSIPUCIJON'If Applicable) Eustis,FL 2010 2010 ;,-r ,!th�,'enr fir Project manager for the historic downtown streetscape design and construction. AECOM provided the City of Eustis with a Downtown Vision Masterplan that serves as the first piece of a revitalization vision. Four blocks of a small downtown retail district have been improved by converting one-way traffic to two way,introducing brick streets,on-street parking,trees, lighting and furnishings which help create a rich and vibrant space for future retailers to open businesses and attract visitors to the downtown. Project Cost: $2 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Mirror Lake Park PROFESS C`;A_s_P',C_, CCs, TRJCT CN if2,;o(L:.,r,Je St.Petersburg,FL 2014 2014 3'3'E -13,.3'rC;l _.� L',2;a_:=CR..-= d. ❑x ..heck.f orpje.t_ar*ormeb with current firm Project Manager for this downtown park and has led the phase 1 master planning effort and construction documentation for a pedestrian sidewalk/trail around Mirror Lake in downtown St.Petersburg. This park design reshapes the area around the lake to capture more green space for pedestrian activities. Boardwalks,floating docks,plaza spaces,signage and new plantings have been designed to respect the area's historic buildings and period architecture. Project Cost: $65,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City}and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Nemours Children's Hospital PRO- 3S:}^la=S_P,C_, CONSTRUCTION if ccl,cabie' Orlando,FL 2013 2014 av == = it , _ _, , 6.r- 't•' Project Manager that oversaw landscape and hardscape design for the exterior spaces and amenities of the hospital. AECOM's role as Landscape Architect helped guide the project to receive LEED Gold certification by the use of native landscape plant material,native upland restoration,the use of harvested stormwater water for irrigation and recycled building materials. '.-.1,42 " -C''.' we PrOfessiu,idl A't;hileutural and Engineeririg 8ervn..es AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE ._ 1^!!-H OJRRE,IT`Rm Andrew Sheppard, RLA, LEED AP Landscape Architect/Designer 14 12 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 15.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) B.S., Landscape Architecture, Ball State University, Muncie, Registered Landscape Architect, FL#6666767 Indiana, 2000 LEED®Accredited Professional 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Sheppard,a Senior Site Planner and Landscape Architect,has 14 years of experience with visioning,design development and implementation or: Master Planned Communities;Resort and Tourism Planning;Urban Design;Employment Centers and Campus Planning. Mr.Sheppard is focused on creating livable communities,and has experience working at all scales of development on a broad range of residential,commercial and institutional projects throughout the world. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Central Michigan University Campus Master Plan Update 1 'R .,'C,dk-SERV°Es Mount Pleasant,MI 2013 N/A l] Ch':'k f 3r)e_.Q3"orme.i min rt,, , a. Mr.Sheppard served as the senior designer for the University of Central Michigan campus master plan update. The plan included a walkability and mobility study. A series of week-long charrettes were conducted to gain input and build consensus from University Stakeholders,faculty,students and the City of Mount Pleasant. Shared spaces,new quads, • future building locations and an enhanced street network were included in the design,creating new view corridors and increasing circulation and connectivity throughout the campus. Project Cost: $325,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED 63rd Street TOD Corridor Study RCF_SSICtia._SERVICES CONSTRUCT,ON'If Applicable; Chicago,IL 2013 N/A b. - - El :Theox DnIect peff3rmea N "?! Mr.Sheppard served as the Lead Designer in developing a vision for the 63rd street corridor,located in the Washington Park neighborhood,south side of Chicago. A week long visioning workshop was conducted to ensure that the final recommended plan has a broad level of support and understanding.Elements such as land uses,safety,building orientation,parks and neighborhood character were discussed. Fee: $150,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2}YEAR C Kissimmee Lakefront Park - - = C'S COMPLETED OMP J 2'l '`'° °° Kissimmee,FL 2014 2014 X .-__, ,;i ;;[o?rforne:]Ni*_i�,Jrr�nt`irm Senior Designer. Landscape,hardscape,lighting,master planning,design,community workshops and construction services for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. Project Cost:$25 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan =ROFESS ONA.SERV'CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable: St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A 3,7.--: - ,, _ 3 :. .\' J '_.: ..__ iJ ., -:F•f ar:ject aerformed rovith:;,.r�-Ir firm. d. Project Designer for the City of St.Petersburg Downtown Waterfront Master Plan. AECOM has been selected to provide planning,design and public participation services for the City of St.Petersburg. The AECOM Team will conduct a number of public participation activities to gather input for future planning of the waterfront. The downtown waterfront stretches approximately seven miles from north to south and consists of various place types,including neighborhoods,parks, downtown,port,airport,university and healthcare campuses. AECOM will generate a master plan that provides a framework for future project implementation. Project Cost: $490,000(design) II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Forest City Military Communities -=5� '" R',y=S c''''R ', `�° "'° Various Locations,US 2013 N/A 3 3 __ a-_ ❑X phi K:r„r3, 0,.,_+3,,edN .`irrn Mr.Sheppard serves as the Senior Designer and Project Leader for several Forest City Military Communities. One of many projects is the Southern Group(Arnold AFB,Keesler AFB,Joint Base Charleston and Shaw AFB). Services include:visioning, programming,large scale master planning,site specific area studies,landscape architecture,parks and project coordination. The goal at each base is to create outstanding living environments that are well planned,safe,resource efficient,and accommodatin to thoughtful rank separation. ProljectCost: $650,000(design) S '\IJ''., _2\"'�0 ' CI F MIAMI ACM - P-ofcooional A'ohitcoturp and Engrnccrrng Scrvicco 43- E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Architect/ 3 - Thomas J. McMacken,Jr., RLA Construction Documents 37 17 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University, Registered Landscape Architect, FL#1193 Baton Rouge, LA, 1977 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.McMacken has utilized his 37 years of experience as a registered Landscape Architect to expand his firm's ability to provide clients with construction documentation that compliments the design capabilities that have long been the strength of the firm.His passion for site design, construction documentation,project management,and quality control has been transferred into systems and procedures that have contributed significantly to the firm's mission of planning and designing livable communities. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) ` �s ",,,,.•',•,,,,,',,,,,.;' ,,,.;' w ` , a (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Orlando Amway Center Streetscape I '°72,-ESS CONSTRUCT ON''f.cp'icae'eI Orlando,FL 2008 2011 a. - ..`i 3 .r ..-.. 3 .,_... ._A'I' ?: = 0 cx '3r.je_ ,,,orme.1 with .Jr-ent firm Project Management Oversite and QA/QC. AECOM provided the City with design services that included conceptual design, design development,final design and construction documents as well as bid and construction phase assistance. Project Cost: $875,000(design),$4 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Lake Beauty Park Redevelopment ?RcFESS ONALSERVIC_S CONSTRUCTION:ifApplicoble; Orlando,FL 2012 2013 '3'3R=--=SCR'R' N 3 a _ ?t' A`,-S? - = b. Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC of the redevelopment of the 4 acre Lake Beauty Park in Downtown Orlando at the Gateway to the Orlando Health campus.The project required use agreements between three land owners and addressed a variety of open space,environmental quality and transportation needs for both the community and the on-campus population at Orlando Health. Project Cost: $250,000(design),$2.9 Million(construction) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Church Street Streetscape SS NA-SER','CES .-.RSTRL'CT'ON If Applicable' Orlando,FL 2007 2012 3 3= _ �_ ON'3r'r ,p _ :gat.etc,'AND SPEC ROLE E -, ��< ��r"Ji ''n'3�7 N'�ih�J' ��� Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC. As a sub-consultant to WBQ Design and Engineering,AECOM provided services that included data collection and public participation,concept development,design development,construction documentation, and permitting services. AECOM also provided bid phase assistance and construction observation assistance. The one mile streetscape project is estimated to be a$12.5 million capital improvement. Project Cost: $271,200 (1)TiTLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Sanford Avenue Streetscape uROcESSIONA_SERVICES CONSTRUCTION((fApp?icable) Sanford,FL 2013 2013 3'3'R'E=JESCR!?T'ON'Brief scope,size..7ost.et. AND S?EC'RIC ROLE Q Check's 3roject partorrnecI with current firm d. Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC. AECOM assisted the Community Redevelopment Agency of Sanford in developing an innovative streetscape for a 5-block section of Sanford Avenue. The proposed concept includes a cultural corridor pathway on the east side of the street that will provide opportunities to incorporate historical markers and art into the streetscape. Another unique element of the streetscape is a curbless edge providing the pedestrian with barrier free access. Project Cost: $298,000(design),$2 Million(construction) II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Greenville Downtown Streetscape Design SRO= A S_ ,�a ONSTRJCT.,N if 1po'icabiei Greenville,SC 2011 2011 3 3 __ 3�i,:'CV,3r,r 3> s..etc:>N?S?=C=''C ROLE Landscape Architect of Record/QA/QC for this comprehensive streetscape project providing schematic design for 10 miles of Greenville's downtown streets for the City of Greenville. The project inventoried the existing conditions of the streets and developed a Streetscape Master Plan that developed into Schematic Design Drawings. Project Cost: $250,000 44 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Landscape Architect/ s,r-1_73:q `'!'`'',M Galen Pugh, RLA Construction Documents 25 1 Month 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Registered Landscape Architect, FL#1522 B.A. Landscape Architecture, Louisiana State University OPTED Course Completion Certified Planner(AICP) #019833 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training Awards,etc.) •r.'ug is a'eggs ere. an.scape A rc I ec 'rojec •anager w! over •years o governmen a an. priva e an.scape Arc I ec ure experience, which includes working as a Sr.Landscape Architect and a Sr.Planner. He additionally has provided professional services such as procurement of consultants,directing and reviewing the preparation of site plans,construction documents and landscape plans. Mr.Pugh has coordinated the public participation process and conducted public and steering committee meetings for several projects in the public realm. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED IRO ESS'�VaLSER`i'CES CONSr.RUCT'ON"IfApcGcabi. First Avenue Streetscape(Phase II) - Sanford,FL 1 2009 2010 a. The intent of this project is to closely match the streetscape of improvements previously completed on First Street.Plans and services included the conceptual and final design of a Gateway feature introducing the historic district. Design elements included in this design were:Sidewalk and street curb layout,planting and paver design,parking layout,irrigation plans, lighting and electrical plan,site furniture selection and layout,streetscape details and Gateway entrance architectural design details. Project Cost: $1.5 Million (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED State Road 17-92 Streetscape PROF_SS'CVAL SERVICES �:.N5-t.'CT'ON ,f=pc!ICati_, Sanford,FL 2010 2011 Mr. Pugh prepared beautification plans for the stretch of 17-92 between Airport Blvd and Park Avenue.This streetscape project will add new life to a portion of this heavily used and vital commercial corridor.The scope of the project will include the installation of gracious shade trees,grand and dramatic palms near the 417 bridge,colorful accent trees and a variety of ground covers rich in texture and color. Project Cost: $300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Punta Gorda Linear Park .-70=E33:-..,-1-1,`._.E.'J:E3 2,3NS-R'JCT Yl F4co!.'cabi; Punta Gorda,FL 2010 2013 Mr. Pugh provided design services for Phases II and III of a three phase linear park in Punta Gorda. Mr.Pugh was involved in providing landscape architecture package,for the Phase II section. The project included a 10'asphalt walking trail/bike path,rest/rain stations,lighting,accent paving design street crosswalks,pedestrian bridges over the creek where required, and appropriate site furnishings to include benches,water fountain,bollards,and trash cans. Project Cost: $1.2 Million 1 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park -,RCFE SSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION;IfAppiicabie! Lake Mary,FL 2012 TBD d. ❑ 2n-e:i i-)r)I?,•per`)rmed NI',h 'r` 'r`T Mr. Pugh prepared Landscape Architecture plans for this half acre park. A historical timeline will lead up to the focal point of the park that will include a fountain monument to be constructed in a future phase. All of this will be surrounded by lush • Florida Friendly landscaping within an innovative and environmentally sensitive rain garden. Interpretive signage will also help to educate patrons on the environmental benefits of this type of garden. Project Cost: $350,000 (T)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Winter Springs Town Center Trail PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION"lfRppiicoble,, Winter Springs,FL 2007 2009 e. ❑ Check.f p,Thect perrorme7'Nita current*vm The trail was designed as a walk through a French Provincial Garden.A series of garden rooms were created,highlighted by garden pavilions,classical pergolas and a welcoming fountain at the north entrance to the corridor.Landscaping is designed to be colorful and lush,with stately Sylvester Palms guiding your way along the Trail. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 45 .l E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 11=11.1111111116„ 'Mr l 11lMMIIIIII 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Hannah Plate Landscape Designer/Construction _. - ,,'T" ._,RE'4`=Rti' Documents 1.5 1 AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Orlando, FL 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, 2013 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications.Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Ms.Plate joined the Buildings and Places group in October 2013,and her experience and background has been a vital asset to the landscape architecture team. Awards include: Environmental Protection Agency Campus Rainworks Challenge winner:2013,University of Florida Department of Landscape Architecture:2013 ASLA Student Honor Award 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Tamarac Parks,Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan :�,`�=„,c,,ia_SERVICES CONSTRUCT ON"IfApctico;e Tamarac, FL Ongoing N/A El . ,_:, t ,oleot aer*0,-rnei,oitn,,,r.ent a. The City of Tamarac selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Specific project role included providing long range visioning for selected parks within the long range system vision. Project Cost: $145,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED SRO'-SS,ONA'L SERV CES C,CNJ :N '-Arc::^.::e Lake Nona Boulevard Landscape Improvements, Phase III Orlando,FL 2013 2014 r3I 3R DE:3CR.T CV 3r,r i,3oe s dos, ?.,-.: A‘4 D 5 E: _C R' = „ �x or ^t b. As the gateway roadway into the Lake Nona community,the boulevard enhancements set the design standard for the rest of the development.Improvements were designed based on guidelines previously developed including decorative roadway and pedestrian paving,plazas,columns and fencing,walls,adjacent trail layout and surfacing,median and roadway edge landscape,and irrigation.Specific project role included landscape designer. Project Cost: $100,000(design),$3.5 Million (construction) II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Winter Springs Intersection Improvements SS NC RV _ ONS '' ap ':an:e. Winter Springs, FL Ongoing 2014 - 0 Cha,:!<.F project performed Nir••:errant firm Implemented a series of safety and operational improvements in the vicinity of the intersection of S.R.434 and Tuskawilla Road in Winter Springs.The project is comprised of roadway improvements and streetscape treatments.Specific project role included landscape designer for the$149,000 project. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Re-Imaging The Flamingo Master Plan Everglades National Park, RRC=ESSCNALSERVICES CONSTRUCT;ON;If Applicoo9: Florida,University of Florida Capstone Project N/A N/A d. 3t 3?== =SC3 R'_ 3 j j � ❑x Check 3 project performed with current firm This project explored the role of ecotourism within the Everglades National Park through an evaluation of the 2010 Flamingo Master Plan in conjunction with traditional site analysis.Resulted in an ecotourism master plan that compliments the efforts made by the Park Service and suggest further steps on how to develop Flamingo as an ecotourism destination. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Woodward Academy Wayfinding and Focal Entryway Master Plan O _ss o a�SERVICES C'I3 a a;:: �; Atlanta,GA Ongoing N/A ;�,37 .j.- _ , _ > _... > _ AN_, ,..__ ❑a The, rJr-,, _t 79 r ^la,,,tn .. en` ^ Currently on going,this project has an anticipated completion date of 2014.Provided a limited scope master plan;that includes campus destination wayfinding for vehicles and pedestrians,as well as preliminary designs for a focal entryway into campus.Specific project role included landscape design of the focal entryway for the$105,000 project. 46 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectu rat and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT ': (Complete one Section E for each key person) ., ......M M.. ..,:1 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Park Planner 14 14 15.NA] + 't LOCATIO''« 'and Stater AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Raleigh, NC 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture,The Ohio State Registered Landscape Architect: FL#6667065 University, 2005 Registered Landscape Architect: NC#1703 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Kuhn has been integrally involved in all phases of the planning and design process including project management,design,construction document production,in addition to public involvement such as:interviews,focus groups,stakeholder meetings,public presentations and lectures.Having led various parks and recreation system master plans and design projects,Mr.Kuhn understands the importance of transparent and inclusive processes, time and budgetary constraints,and multidisciplinary team environments. Awards: Florida ASLA Honor Award,2013 Haulover Park General Plan. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Haulover Park 'RO=ESS CNa_SERV CES CONSTRUCT ON'1fApplicablei Miami-Dade County,FL 2012 N/A a. Project Manager and Designer. Project included the development of a park planning P ro ram plan for the 260+acre heritage park for Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation Department.Traffic circulation and site design were primary areas of focus for the project.Final proposed improvements to state route Al A were presented to and approved by FDOT District 6.Other significant improvements to the park included the complete redesign of the County's only dry rack storage for boats and a boat launch facility as well as the planning for as many as two parking structures with the park. Project Cost: $81,600 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) , (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami-Dade County Parks and Open Spaces System Master Plan Miami-Dade County,FL 1 2008 1 N/A 31 3P'EF DESC7iR1-ON 3r' r a;)ce a,:_.; st _ i', S> O=C 3'O'-= b. Park Planner. This 50-year,unifying vision for a livable,sustainable,Miami-Dade County addressed five major components: great parks,great public spaces,great natural and cultural places,great greenways,trails,and water trails,and great streets.Through a series of public involvement workshops,lifestyle/demographic analysis,analysis of existing systems, neighborhoods,various community and county-wide visions,benchmarking and economic analysis,AECOM developed a series of guiding principles for all five components. The Parks and Open Space System Master Plan was successfully approved by the County in March of 2008.Project Cost:$377,000. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED �RO�=ESS:ONA_SER'i O=3 20 S-'UC"ON'lfApolfcabie) Raleigh Parks,Recreation and Cultural Resources System Plan, - - Raleigh,NC 2014 N/A Project Manager/Lead Planner. Major components of the Plan will include Neighborhood Demographics Analysis;a Maintenance,Staffing and Programming Analysis;an access-based Level of Service Analysis(LOS);interviews with a cross section of the project stakeholders;a mail/telephone survey;an illustrative vision;a cost estimate and Implementation Strategy. Project Cost: $415,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Tamarac Parks,Recreation&Open Space System Master Plan 'R-�ESS 0Na,SEat,CES CONSTRUCT;ON;IfApolicable Tamarac,FL l Ongoing N/A Project Manager. The City of Tamarac selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Project Cost: $145,000 I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Doral Parks and Open Space Master Plan ' O -5 j'i -a oC'43 °� �`4;rfrppl,cable' Doral,FL 2010 N/A _ _ - -_ � .. ..:F J';I':L,Je-?,.te :Nom, ....r'e'ef`I-T Park Planner. AECOM developed a City-Wide Parks and Open Space Master Plan that analyzes access to and develops a Vision for the City's Parks,Open Spaces and Recreation Facilities. Project Cost: $175,000. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 47 E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Drew Crumpton Park Planner 1 1 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Raleigh, NC 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Master of Landscape Architecture, North Carolina State University, 2013 Bachelor of Science in Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, 2010 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc) Mr.Crumpton is a landscape designer and park planner with AECOM,providing support for projects serving public agencies nationwide.He specializes in parks and recreation system master plans and graphic visualizations for transportation design projects. Mr.Crumpton has been involved in all phases of the planning and design process including project support,demographic analysis,graphic visualizations,and public involvement such as; workshops,focus groups,stakeholder meetings,and public presentations.Working on various master plans and transportation projects has provided Mr.Crumpton with an understanding of the value of thorough analysis,inclusive participation,clear and concise presentation,and collaborative team environments. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Raleigh Parks,Recreation and Cultural Resources System Plan, - 1F==S DNA_3=PV°ES COvS-RUCT ON•tfAccIicabie) Raleigh,NC 2014 N/A Project Manager/Lead Planner. Major components of the Plan will include Neighborhood Demographics Analysis;a Maintenance,Staffing and Programming Analysis;an access-based Level of Service Analysis(LOS);interviews with a cross section of the project stakeholders;a mail/telephone survey;an illustrative vision;a cost estimate and Implementation Strategy. Project Cost: $415,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED '�CFESS;CNA'_SERYCES CCNSTRUCTCN:ifAppI,cab•a City of Rocky Mount Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Rocky Mount,NC I Ongoing N/A b. _ - I] t,f ,Iea Jerf;rmed Nit,:,rent firm Landscape Designer and Planner. The City of Rocky Mount selected AECOM to develop a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2013. The plan included an extensive analysis of the existing system,a comprehensive needs assessment including . a significant public involvement component with focus groups,interviews stakeholder input and a public opinion survey,a long range vision,and a feasible implementation plan. Project Cost:$110,000 1.(1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED River of Grass Greenway Feasibility Study and Master Plan »O ESSlotia-SE '.C=S CC`4S73_,CT CiN 1fA0ot/cable; Miami-Dade County to Collier County,FL Ongoing 2015 3'r_ - - ___ ..o- ... •, .,__ El Ch.._. :r01e.,..,._ ,"ndC Nita 7,^ent firm Landscape Designer. Funded by a Federal Transit Administration grant through the National Parks Service and Miami-Dade County,the River of Grass Greenway Feasibility Study and Master Plan includes a comprehensive evaluation of the social, environmental and economic impact of this potential 75 mile greenway.Project includes an extensive analysis of benefits and cost;multi-phased implementation plan;and over 25 community meetings and three weeks of on-site workshops. Project Cost: $846,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED West Kendall District Park .ROFESSIONA;.SERV'C_S CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) Miami-Dade County,FL 2015 N/A d. _ 3,3 _2E,,,--; AN _. _ ❑x :._'t f o'3 ._.�r'),'T12"�'N•t .,.. '^t il' Landscape Designer and Planner. Provided a park planning program plan for the 164 acre park and sports complex. Part 1 Master Plan is completed. A business plan is 20%completed. Project Cost:$30,000 I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Chuck Pezoldt Park ,ROF_SS.CN.A_SERV'C'_S CONSTRUCT ON;lfAppllcable) Miami-Dade County,FL 2014 N/A Landscape Designer and Planner. Provided a park planning program plan for the 40 acre park.Project Cost:$40,000 48 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ! Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Dale Morehouse, CID, CLIA Water Use/Irrigation 20 9 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Fort Collins,CO 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) BA,Colorado State University Certified Irrigation Designer(CID), Irrigation GIS Certification, Natural Resources, Front Range Community Association-Residential,Commercial,Golf Course College Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor(CLIA), Irrigation Association 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Morehouse has worked on a variety of projects for both public and private sector clients,including residential developments,corporations, educations institutions,parks and government facilities. He has designed irrigation systems for nine US embassies. He is certified by the Irrigation Association as a Certified Irrigation Designer(CID)in residential,commercial and golf course specialties,and as a Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor(CLIA),he has conducted system evaluations and audits,taught irrigation and water conservation classes,and experienced in cross- connection control.He is experienced in AutoCAD,SketchUp,GIS and computer systems management. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Boulder Parks,Central Control Irrigation Study ,C=ESS 3E'`/ D'1S 'r tif-13Ct cc:' Boulder,Colorado 1 2009 N/A a l3, - ; 3 3�ope,size,zost.etc AND SEC=C-C_C X ❑ ., eck if 3r7jdct pa, ormed with;;urrent firm Irrigation designer that provided evaluation of irrigation control system related to current needs of the Parks Department, most prominently,water conservation. Project Cost: $15,500 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 4iiik " + 4, (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Denver Parks and Recreation,Central Irrigation Control PROFE3S!ONA.SER'I CES C'DNS' '.OT_N'.faccf,-,,,,, Masterplan,Denver,CO 2010 N/A b. • 0 Cnecu',f rroject performed n th c:,-rent firm Irrigation designer that provided evaluation of irrigation control system related to current needs of the Parks Department, most prominently,water conservation. Project Cost: $73,000 (1}TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US Embassy Compound Renovation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2ONS-4JOTON"If apulicabie, Maputo,Mozambique 2014 N/A Irrigation System Designer. The landscape design is required to be sustainable and water conserving. The irrigation system, predominately using drip technology,will use 100%treated sewage effluent after plant establishment. LEED documentation related to water use was provided. Project Cost: $38,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED US Embassy Compound Renovation and Expansion =R= ONa_S=a‘;C_S :TIST-RuCT ON if400licooia; Ashgabat,Turkmenistan 2014 N/A d. 3 3R.==D_SC� „'d'3n r 3.30 :ost etc: AND S=EC- 0'_= ❑ hark I.:),Die t pe}orm ■ ri r Irrigation Consultant and Designer. Plans were developed to guide landscape design,including irrigation. Construction documents were also provided for some areas. Project Cost: $15,000 II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED National Rural Utility Cooperative Finance Corporation :,,�J=EDS ONA- RV 0=S 00N3T3JCT ON lr-1pplicable, Headquarters 2011 N/A Loudon County,VA _ „—� _ 3 r.' = 0 _, ,,,,:t - ,;,:t^..p it hr Irrigation Designer. AECOM developed a landscape plan for the new headquarters site. The new irrigation system had two points of connection,the larger one with reuse water,the other with potable water,with one control system utilizing soil moisture sensors. Irrigation design,construction documents,LEED documentation and booster pump specifications were provided. The state also required a reuse water plan and documentation Project Cost: $28,700 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 49 I E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jason Bird Water Use/Irrigation 15 5.5 AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,Sarasota, FL 18.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Civil Engineering Coursework, University of Central Florida 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Mr.Bird is an experienced engineering professional with a focus on all aspects of land development,including commercial and residential projects,utility infrastructure projects,and roadway projects.He also has experience taking projects from feasibility studies to conceptual planning,through full design,permitting,and construction administration.Mr.Bird has focused on water resources;infrastructure assessment; infrastructure sustainability;green infrastructure(low-impact design),SSIM water balance modeling;and LEED,Green Mark,and GBES sustainability evaluations for municipal projects,master planned communities and federal facilities. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED National Park Service,Flamingo Masterplan and Design Program 1 — __,-•cNLa_sERV�cES coNSTRuCT.0'4 'raco,, :. Everglades National Park,FL l 2010 N/A 3R!E=OcSCR:=-"..V"3raf :c..s,_..._,3. 3....ANC'SPE:_ , a C .3 3, . _,t Infrastructure assessment and recommendations for sustainable redevelopment for a long range masterplan and design program for this historic Mission 66 developed area.The project included on-site workshops.The masterplan exemplifies the sustainable vision of the national park and guides planning,design,construction,restoration,and use of Flamingo for the next 50 years. Project Cost: $250,000(including subs) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED St.Petersburg Waterfront Master Plan =ROFESS:oNALS_RV'CES 3:osl3-R_, 4 St.Petersburg,FL Ongoing N/A '3:3R E_DE3CP.i.7.,,4 2,_ ,‘r_.. ---= El v,:,Ck f 3r0 .i 7erf,"7,3,:1 NIfI,,'Jr:i�t'"'-i Sustainable Infrastructure lead for waterfront masterplan,including climate adaptation,considering affects to existing and future development and critical infrastructure related to storm surge,wave action and sea level rise. Project Cost: $500,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NAVFAC Midlant,SSIM Pilot Study ESS,oua 3_RV'cES CONSTRUCT ON'it aoo,,:ooi,. Little Creek,Virginia l 2010 N/A C. 3'•3Pr.ESOP 3"C'i 3r-:,,rs3.,,, _ :...:_. i,.5._. - Q ;hni_:t'f 31-3;-?Ct,:.?.,- rme,i Aorr 3.,r°?nt:Firm Water lead and SSIM modeller for project that developed a process for evaluating the current status of the base as it relates to federal mandates.Projected the masterplan and impacts related to incorporating all active 1391 projects out to FY 2020. Project Cost: $300,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED NAVFAC,Guam Joint Military Masterplan Water Plan =POF-ss'ON SERV CES CoNSTPJCr OV''`a,;o':-,,riz Implementation,Guam 1 2011 N/A d. i3)3R'E=3_SC'<',3r ON Er_ .1JC?., ..;sf._.. A‘1?3'E0_0 PC„E ❑ Check if prnIe t performed wit^�Larrant firm Involved with creating the implementation plan for water modeling results and recommendations.The implementation involved USGBC LEED certification,tracking,and continued monitoring and support to ensure the anticipated performance goals were achieved. Project Cost: $1.5 Million II (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COM PLETED US Army Corps of Engineers,Huntsville District,Comprehensive ,, o==SS ^��_3_�� =3 3NST�ucT:oN"'f4opli+.ab!e' Energy and Water Masterplan,Various Locations 2011 N/A Performed evaluation and project planning for utility improvements to 31 Army bases.Project focus was to meet water and energy reduction requirements as mandated by the federal government.The water reduction included a 26%reduction in water consumption intensity. Evaluated various conservation and reuse strategies to achieve this goal for all 31 bases, including some located in deserts where water is an extremely valuable resource. Project Cost: $850,000(water only) 3rAN3 AP:'i=ORM 330.1 :JUL, 50 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ■ Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Michael Gnaegy Certified Arborist 37 37 15.NAME OF FIRM AND LOCATION(City and State) Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc., Homestead, FL 18.EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. ISA Arborist/Pesticide Applications/Wholesale Tree Farm & ISA Certified Arborist- ISA FL#0278A Nursery/All Tree Services- Removal, Relocation,Trimming, Florida Department of Agriculture&Consumer Root Pruning&Landscape Planting Services./Grounds Services Applicators License#CM13479 Maintenance./Mitigation &Natural Area Restoration Services, DERM BMP Certificate #GV13170-1 Wetlands,Coastal, Pineland, Hammock Areas. Site Clearing& Preparation. Mulching Services. 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Member&Board of Director at FNGLA 2008-2013;Member AFNN(Association of Florida Native Nurseries;FNPS(Florida Native Plant Society);Miami- Dade Cooperative Extension Overall Extension Advisory Committee-Best Management Practices Certification GV13170-1;Florida Department of Agriculture Consumer Services-Categories(5A)Aquatics,(6)Right of Way&(21)Natural Areas Management;OSHA 30 Hr Training;Florida Grades& Standards;FNGLA Bebe Greer Award. 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation Old Cutler Road Landscape Project DROFESSIONAL SE:RV CES CONSTRUCTION,'IfApp!icable; City of Cutler Bay,FL 2013 2013 Landscape Install a. -- `, = ,-.7,-. -- --, 3� 3"._C-C POLL Q _..i r.)r7i,. ,,.. :,-'r`-?1 ri :.., .•t ..n Landscape Upgrade Old Cutler Road for the City of Cutler Bay. Secure-Plant Materials with L/A site specific designations/ installation. Project Total: $405,000 The actual site preparation/plant selection&installation&remedial monitoring/ reports. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation-Miami Marine Stadium .a0=E3s S NVV :ONS' UCTION nf.4pplicco,e City of Miami, FL N/A 2012 b. 3 3R E=DESCR:-)7 ON,3.ef s:coe. .COS .3r:,4ND SPE: q`--= Q Create a Retention Area/Improve Drainage&Mitigate Wetland Planting. Wetland Drainage project: $120,000. Miami Dade Capital Improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation Oak Grove Park 'ROFESSIONAL SERV'CES CONSTRUCTION(If Applicable) City of Miami,FL 2014 2014 (3)3R.t=3t3�R:= JN,3-ref scope.size,cost,etc.;AND SPECIFIC ROLE :;heck if oroiect performed no*";:,-ant'i-m Relocation of Specimen Oak Trees, Established a Value Engineering-Design/Methodology to Root Prune/Relocate Massive Specimen Live Oaks&Other Large Specimen Native Trees. Design/Build full irrigation system. Establish a method to relocate several large specimen trees within Oak Grove Park with 100%guarantee of survival. Project Total: $165,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation-Virginia Beach Key Parking—Key Biscayne =4O=E3:,,O°la_SEr< CES CONSTRUCT cN If apoEcacie, City of Miami,FL N/A 2014 d. =. _ ❑ r. r;1, 'r' n Establish a 1,000 linear foot native planting buffer for Virginia Key Parking Buffer. Prep/Installations. Project Total: $63,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Parks&Recreation/Special Tax District OROzESS.CNOL SEL CES 2CNSTRUCTION'If4pol,cabie City of Miami,FL 2011-2012 2011-2012 3! _:_1JE3J.'-JN:3'ar s 1 2.7,C,3, AND SP R'. Design/Bid Various areas throughout the'`Special Tax District"Right of Way Neighborhood Improvements. $75,000. Miami-Dade Capital Improvements. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitectural and Engineering Se-vices 51 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(Ci and State) 2' 22 YEAR COMPLETED Altos Del Mar Park Miami Beach,FL 2013 - 2014 N/A 23. .JECT OWNER'S INFORMATION • - --OONTACT NAME c. a0!NT OF CONTACT T=LE?`:;ENE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Park and John Rebar (305)673-7000,ext.6579 i Recreation Department johnrebar @miamibeachfl.gov 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCETO THIS CONTRACt(include scope size and cost) ' The City of Miami Beach(City)selected _ AECOM to provide professional services to 'e develop a Master Plan for Altos Del Mar Park. r... \. �' ?F ;o. � Altos Del Mar Park, located on Collins Avenue '-'` ' .4 ` between 76th and 77th Street, is one of the''= :` 1 l last undeveloped beach front parcels within •' 1' �� t`?..Y... the City of Miami Beach.The undeveloped 2.5 acre park currently offers a wide variety of -- _ - U passive public space and open space uses 1 �; located along 76th Street.Along the southern 1 �,� .. •"'y �"'�` � -''�'�- , edge of the park,there is a Miami-Dade County Public Library and a municipal a " 3 nR, surface parking area.The park also offers an .', - '' undefined pedestrian connection to the beachwalk and beach.The principle design ,,•, w P P g goal for Altos Del Mar Park is to provide for =' e i passive and accessible recreational needs of }• - j €< area residents through a neighborhood ,, ,. .,:, master plan development involving a process , that included the assistance and input of '' LL.- community residents and the approval of City's key stakeholders.A preferred s �"` alternative for Altos Del Mar Park was . ' Tt � Amor 1 •- selected involving the community residents s o ; and the City's key stakeholders that will aim .x .' �, -- to provide for the needs of area residents. -1111100M, PROJECT VALUE $67,935(design),$4,610,000(estimated ita construction) RELEVANCE TO MIAMI r BEACH PROJECT - ., • Intensive Public Involvement ,.. -.0,1;4 r Open• 0 p Space ace Assessment • Connectivity to Other Public Spaces ' Beach Access Improvements ' . '�� • ADA Facilities and Features 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. '11`'R,,;I N-\M ;21 ,RM'_:)CAT'ON'C;n nd St 1t?.; (31 ROLE AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture & Urban Design, Master Planning b (1)FIRM NAME '21 FIRM LOCATON(City Ind Stets? ;3I RO'_E c. (11 cIR.M NAME (2, =PM_OCAr'ON(r'iry 3Pd Stir a; 3, RO'_.i 52 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P--ofessionat A-cnitectu rat and Engineering Se,vices AECOM F EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT(EY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Corn..- e acne Section F for each project.;, 21.TITLE AND LOCATION{City and Stag ,, .- 22.YEAR COMPLETEi]. Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design and Streetscape PRO'E3SONALSER'/ICES Improvements,Miami Beach,FL 2005-2009 2008-2009 -._.. - k 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION I a aROJE2- =CON rAarNAM E City of Miami Beach David Martinez, PE, LEED AP (305) 673-7071 progress @miamibeachfl.gov 24.SREEF DESCRIPilON OF.ROJECTAND RELEVANCE TO THIS S CONTRACT{tnctude scope,size,and cost) illi .4" 4. ,,, . Jp., .• . r' .R 's l 10 • •'-' . �►- • --PI LI • it .-- •' _ — " iy-` / " w.. y, t ' r ,e .. L - PROJECT VALUE ' k, . ',.. $3.5 Million(construction) es xr RELEVANCE TO MIAMI A j. BEACH PROJECT ° ' • Streetscape and Urban Design Improvements AECOM prepared urban design and streetscape plans for most of the recently • designated National Register Collins Waterfront Historic District on Miami Beach. Extensive Public Involvement This project area includes many historic MiMO landmarks,such as the • Construction Administration Fontainbleau and Eden Roc Hotels designed by Morris Lapidus. • Beach Dune Restoration The Oceanfront neighborhood project includes improvements to the City owned public right-of-ways and several"greenway"locations between the Atlantic Ocean and Indian Creek. The streetscape enhancements consist of new planting (such as native grasses,dune vegetation,specimen palms,and shade trees); new sidewalks;a bikeway;street furniture;new curbs;bollards and benches;a pedestrian plaza with specialty paving,coral stone feature walls,showers,foot washers,and drinking fountains;and milled and resurfaced street pavement,as well as pedestrian-scale lighting. Traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures,such as landscaped "bump- outs"at street corners and specialty crosswalks at intersections,were also implemented. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. (1;='RM NAM,: -'?M_:ox-::,,i ,;r,iStote) 3 ?C-= AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Coral Gables,FL Landscape Architecture& Urban Design,Master Planning b. ;1i=:PM NAME 2: =3M_OCAr 3.N'City3nd Stwta' 2 -_ c. ;1 ='oMNAmF. _=R'.' ,.^,:r.3N'C,tylr,dState) 3' RQ..2 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?ofessionaI Arcnitectural aid Engineering Services 53 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 3 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.:TITLE ANA f,OCATlQN CGiax ltd SW-44." a; '2r.YEAR COMPLETED Heritage Park Sunny Isles Beach,FL 2007-2008 2009-2011 (+t- PRO •41.x.,: t 4- .. u=..., • RO - 'OIN- ,ONTACTNAME c. '-OINTJF CONTACT r___-'-,7,NENUMBER City of Sunny Isles Beach Chris Russo (305)947-0606 crusso @sibfl.net 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO TiiiS CONTRACT ncfude scope,size,and cos , . . . . . . . . . .. _ ,i 0414 . . . . - - . . It a .* - ' ''''' lib,r14?4$11011.r." ,' it ',-1- i-. . . • ;. ,,,-.• . i : ".*.: S: : ":: 7."e. : :: ,.,_ ..' .... ..110,-: -7---jr: -- .\ ,_ r r a ' : ... t . .. .. -'91P11",c-Arscia-,- lit - ■ pia it. 41 a e . 9,�,,--sue -- - _•.... - A t,rte„ 4r"r:jpJ '. +— --- 4' , 7 -1)11111a r *I ••dip,. _i, , Mk,. ..e ^ ' • "r y ,gyp, k, , AECOM is responsible for the landscape, hardscape and site furniture design . from concept through construction administration for a 5 acre park and parking - --*-"garage within the City of Sunny Isles Beach,Florida.This passive park will be the - _ largest park within the City and will include walking paths,multi-use lawn, performance stage, park pavilion, playgrounds and custom interactive fountains PROJECT VALUE and sculptural elements. $10.3 Million Custom detailing and a strong native plant palette will provide the users with an RELEVANCE' `0 MIAMI oasis within a busy urban setting along one of the most important north/south beachfront roadways in Florida. BEACH PROJECT • Open space assessment AECOM's landscape architects worked closely with our in-house architects and • Public involvement 1 engineers responsible for the design of the adjacent parking garage and park structures in order to create a smooth transition and cohesive design for the ▪ Recommended improvements for vehicular and pedestrian users visiting the site. pedestrian connectivity • Visioning 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. 2` �)RM_OCAT'ON C,tv.rnd Stare '3) ROLE AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Coral Gables, FL Landscape Architecture &Urban Design, Master Planning b. i 1.,F) M V,-1V1- ;2) F RM LOCA`ON C tr and Stare;' i, -,),-.2... C. ill=IRV NAM_ 2' ° M_JCA ON`C;y and Stotd, ' < __ • 54 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PofessionaLA'cnitecturat and Engineering Services AECOM F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITL,EG,k4Mo •. 'TIP -,d' ,.,nd State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Ingraham Park --_=- - - �., '.,.T,�,l,,{i,or,".. Coral Gables, FL 2013 - 2013 2013 - 2014 �A -, - 4 TT= City of Coral Gables Ernest R. Pino, RA, LEED AP (305)460-5004 epino -cralgables.com 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) �t r� `� ♦ .• [k W - ki w - ' II fC1 t !•: �yy J 1 , is 1 .a-' t9 tom.. -� 1,....+ _„"iP-- -' ;- - ' • • N._-.,- -'7----f:,......'-'„,..----- AECOM prepared landscape, hardscape, lighting,site planning design, public rr•"....._r- t_ __ outreach,and construction administration services for a 2 acre park in the City of _ Coral Gables. The City's first goal of the park project is to create a world-class civic feature in PROJECT VA LU E the southern part of Coral Gables that is on par with the architectural features that epitomize the character of the City. The signature feature of the park will be $1,028,000 Million(construction) a stone fountain,which is inspired by a fountain that is in the Alhambra in Spain. The fountain is framed by a curved trellis with stone columns and with white RELEVANCE TO MIAMI Bougainvilleas growing up them,which provides a backdrop to the fountain and BEACH PROJECT creates a quiet,shaded area to sit and enjoy the park. • Park Planning and Design In addition to creating a landmark for the southern part of Coral Gables,the . Intensive Community Outreach second goal of the project is to create a high quality park that will enhance the quality of life of local residence by providing a neighborhood park and creating a • Native Landscape recreational hub to serve the recreational needs of the users of the multi-use • Construction Administration Commodore Trail that runs through the park. The site amenities will accomodate both active and passive uses and include an outdoor exercise equipment area, chilled drinking water fountains,a mister for trail users, pet fountains and waste stations, multi-use field, picnic tables,and benches. '' 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (2,. =FPM'_O'O ON'C,t'mnd State) '3` 2f7.,_'E AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Coral Gables,FL Landscape Architecture & Urban Design b. (1)=RM NAME i2' '=PM-OOAr O:N'C; mnd State; 3; -i c. ;1?=PM NAYE :" ,PM'_OCATON Olt,ondStata; '3'' '3^--_ STANDARD=ORM AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Acnitecturat and Engineering Services 55 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 70 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Haulover Park ..OESS!ONA_SE `i CES . CONSTRUCTON(!fApoUcable) Miami-Dade County,FL 2010- 2012 N/A I '23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION - r 'i !. PO!NTO`OONTAC-`, _ . f :.ONrACT I-- - -._ _ _- Miami-Dade County Park and Joe Webb, Park Planning (305)755-7731 Recreation Department Section Supervisor jwebb @miamidade.gov 4l BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(!;tide scope,size,and co ' 'k ;,� { Miami-Dade County Park and Recreation joie( 0 } %' Department sought to develop a park k, :-,11 planning program for an existing 246 acre _,� natural resource heritage park. Project f", highlights included a traffic and circulation ; '` evaluation of existing park conditions, e� ,t . extensive research of comparable beach f'"` and boat launch facilities,and planning of parking facilities.As one of seven heritage 4►! parks of Miami-Dade County, Haulover • a O-" Park has a long history and is one of the most popular beaches in the country. / - ' ' ti' ; it s, Through an integrated planning effort incorporating park program planning and transportation planning,over 23 acres of .: ; i { �' ' *��+ .�� W �,.�� ••. parking will be restored to open green ; space while expanding the park's services �' and infrastructure to accommodate f `'.� , , growing population needs. Development of o " p a new internal parking circulation network rz 1 *- for vehicles and pedestrians involved coordination with the Florida Department i , of Transportation and Miami-Dade County Transit.Capital improvements determined .� mss+ -, rs i.i _ i. ., ; .. during planning are estimated at$80 ,' I million.Awards: Florida Chapter American Society of 't j. �, " Landscape Architects-Award of Honor,2013 I I -, . , .a, a;' ; t PROJECT VALUE I i 06-,:,,,,:l �' , I l „ .•.,,� $81,600(design) f r ( . � .',. . RELEVANCE TO MIAMI r, ”' BEACH PROJECT :r ,`_, r' • Park and open space planning •I, ,,;„, -j, - • Recreation planning ,,- • Public Involvement `` • Visioning 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a. - 2 ='RM OCAT,ON'Cry and Sr-: . (31 ROB AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Orlando and Coral Gables, FL; Landscape Architecture & Raleigh,NC Urban Design, Park Planning b. 1;=RM'd.-0;l_ l2; =ARM_OC.Ar'0N C;ry 313 Store i3'' F2__ c. (1)-.'R'V1 NAME 2 -,AI-.;CA 'Jny ey_T^d Siote, '3'' a'D'-- 56 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Se-vices AECOM G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completiong table. 26.NAMES OF KEY PERSONNEL 2Z ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT Place"X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a.. 10 Greg Ault Principal-in-Charge X X X X Gustavo Santana, MLA Project Manager X X X X Michael Brown,RLA Landscape Architect/Designer Lauren Swan,MLA Landscape Designer/Public Outreach Andrew Sheppard, RLA, LEED AP Landscape Architect/Designer Thomas J. McMacken,Jr., RLA Landscape Architect/Construction X Documents Galen Pugh,RLA Landscape Architect/Construction Documents Hannah Plate Landscape Designer/Construction Documents Nicholas Kuhn, RLA Park Planner Drew Crumpton Park Planner Dale Morehouse,CID,CLIA Water Use/Irrigation Jason Bird Water Use/Irrigation Michael Gnaegy Certified Arborist 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 Altos Del Mar Park Master Plan 6 2 Oceanfront Neighborhood Urban Design 7 and Streetscape Improvements 3 Heritage Park 8 Ingraham Park 9 Haulover Park 10 3La.NJA�J=3 M 33.0'1 JC;� AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 P,ofessional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 57 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. Ranked as the#1 engineering design firm by revenue in Engineering News-Record magazine's annual industry Exceptional Local knowledge and rankings,AECOM is a premier,fully integrated infrastructure and support services firm,with a broad range of markets, renowned global expertise. including transportation,facilities,environmental,energy, water and government.As of October 16,2014,AECOM and URS Corporation have joined as one company,with approximately The AECOM Team will provide the perfect combination 95,000 employees—including architects,engineers,designers, of local knowledge and experience with renowned planners,scientists and management and construction services professionals—serving clients in more than 150 global expertise to innovatively, cost effectively and countries around the world.We provide a blend of global efficiently deliver all components of the Miami Beach reach,local knowledge,innovation,and technical excellence Professional Architecture and Engineering Services in delivering solutions that enhance and sustain the world's project as defined in the Request for Qualifications built,natural and social environments.A Fortune 500 company, Statement. AECOM revenue of approximately$19.5 billion during the 12 months ended Sept.30,2014. TOP 500 While AECOM is worldwide,we truly value the local #1 DESIGN FIRM THE relationships we have developed with our clients in South RE DESIGN PU =�- Florida. For us,the client is always the center of attention and #1 we firmly believe that a reputation is built on each individual #1 TRANSPORTATION P` 4 project resulting in a successful sum of work.We strive to be #1 GENERAL BUILDING t71'' the firm of choice for both our clients and employees in every #2 POWER discipline we practice,and in all geographic areas we serve. We are glad our efforts have not gone unnoticed!AECOM was #2 WATER ,r proud to be recognized in 2014 as one of the"World's Most #3 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ., :u., ' "`-___ Ethical Companies"by Ethisphere Institute and as one of #3 SEWER+WASTE Financial Times'"Best Workplaces". #4 HAZARDOUS WASTE AIllosoxy in Need of Speed AECOM has enjoyed a reputation of being a leader in TOP 500 ACOA1 developing innovative solutions to meet the complex and ever 2014 DESIGN FIRMS changing needs of our clients.We have achieved many engineering breakthroughs by looking beyond the standard when the client needs more.This type of vision,coupled with our senior engineers'familiarity of the regions they serve with dv WORLD'S MOST TM access to global experts, results in more than 85 percent of our business coming from repeat clients. r.M11 ETHIcAL Our Coral Gables office will serve as our local point of contact O and will perform the majority of the work anticipated under this contract.This office provides landscape architecture, COIII PAN I S planning and design services for municipal clients throughout the South Florida area. As a supporting rote our Orlando office ��/ will provide onstruction document production assistance and W A W.ETH IS P H ER E.CO M QA/QC services. We will also utilize our Raleigh office for park planning services and AECOM specialists in Sarasota and Denver for water use/irrigation needs. AECOM's record is distinguished by hallmark attributes such as being ranked#1 in Engineering News Record(ENR)Top 500 Design Firms and one of America's most ethical firms for the fourth consecutive year. ' µ" I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. SIGN, .R7 November 21, 2014 33. NAME. Randy Mejeur, MS, LEED AP, Principal CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM - SOLICITATION NUMBER Of any) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2014-346-YG PART II -GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS AilliiiMPP (If a firm has branch offices.complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) .� � _-.1- - I �� __ � ti v -�lJ�1u atuC AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1970 003184462 (ATS HQ DUNS) 2b.STREET 800 Douglas Entrance, North Tower,2nd Floor a TYPE 2c.CITY 2d 37: - 2e.?JP COCE Corporation Coral Gables FL 33134 I1 c S L BUSINESS STATUS _ - _ = Large Agustin Barrera—Vice President do.TELEPHONE NUMBER 5.: E`,I !-a=OR= s AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (305)447-3546 gus.barrera©aecom.com 3a. F JR,41E;R FI RN1 NA,LI`.S? ;f any) 3b YR.ESTABLISH Former names and/or names of affiliated companies of AECOM Spillis Candella:1960; AECOM Services(formerly Spillis Candela): Technical Services, Inc.(ATS): Spillis Candela,AECOM Services,Inc., EDAW:2005 829320501;EDAW: 097502921; EDAW, Earth Tech,among others Earth Tech:1970 Earth Tech:008609203 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXFE . ANNUAL A ER.A3E REVENUE FOR LAST 5 . ,cl' d.Profile r.;:(JB ;),=..t�a,t?n;? Ind,3Y Nl.T'J @f 06 Architect 384 23 A05/A06 Airports 10• 08 CADD Technician 447 15 C15 Construction Management _ 10 12 Civil Engineer 1,229 16 C14 Conservation and Resource Management 9 15 Construction Inspector 417 4 C18 Cost Estimating;Cost Eng.&Analysis 8 16 Construction Manager 338 5 D04 Design-Build—Preparation of RFPs 8 21 Electrical Engineer 192 4 E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms 9 23 Environmental Engineer 483 3 E07 Energy Conservation, New Energy Sources 10 24 Environmental Scientist 599 1 E09 Env Impact Studies;Assessment;Statements 10 30 Geologist 387 1 G01 Garages;Vehicle Maint. Facilities; Parking Decks 8 37 Interior Designer • 58 4 H01 Harbors;Jetties;Piers;Ship Terminal Facilities , 8 39'Landscape Architect/Designer 92 2 H03 Hazardous;Toxic; Rad Waste Remediation 10 42 Mechanical Engineer 228 3 H04 Heating;Ventilatirfg;Air Conditioning(HVAC) 9 47 Planner: Urban/Regional 331 4 H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking Lots 10 48 Project Manager[subset of other categories] [1,463] [16] H09 Hospital and Medical Facilities 10 57 Structural Engineer 391 8 001 Office Buildings; Industrial Parks 10 58 Technician/Analyst 790 6 P06 Planning(Site, Installation&Project) 10 60 Transportation Engineer 374 4 R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings;Structures; Facilities) 10 62 Water Resources Engineer 108 2 SO4 Sewage Collection;Treatment;and Disposal 10 S09 Structural Design;Special Structures 8 S11 Sustainable Design[subset of other categories] [10] LEED AP[subset of other categories] [480] [13] T03 Traffic and Transportation Engineering 10 Other E!-nn:o/ces 3,702 33 W02 Water Resources; Hydrology;Groundwater 10 U.S.Total 10,550 138 W03 Water Supply;Treatment&Distribution 10 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SER`,"O TE/ENUE lts•iCEX NUMBER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS than S100.000 rriilicr Bess than$5 million ynsert i'°/er)c.e TUE.r l'.."-';2c .r::. . a, g'hi:`: 2 S l 0'.CO to less than$250.000 7 35 million to:ess than$10 million a.Federal Work 1 3 250 000 to less than$500.000 3 510 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 10 1 32:20 200 to less than$1 miilicn 9 325 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 10 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10 $50 million or greater 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Tt+e foregoing is a staleme!wt of fads a. i � h DATc �y,�`„A' �`�Si' January 2014 N-'i t?AND •ITI E Raynette •.Takizawa .ice P eside t,Marketing Services—Government Technical Services f AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL PEPF.ODIJCTION STANDARD FORM 330 •-2004,PAGE S MANDATORY USE DATE . • Part II—CORALGABLES-Jan2014 STANDARD FORM 330 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 5 1. SOLICIT'ATO,'; V i1,17,c7 !!f.ar:,-) ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2014-346-YG PART'!"II -GENERAL QUALIFIC TIONS (If a firm has branch offices,complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) Mix'd Greens, Inc.,> < 1977> < 60 3536 558 Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc.,> < 2009> I < 83 0777509 2b.STREz. _ 28905 SW 162 Avenue 2c.CITY — t _ _ 23.Z Ccc a.TIRE Corporation Homestead FL _ 33033-2200 b 'SMALL BUSINESS ST.aT:3 6a POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Small 7 NAME OF FIRM 0!-IC Mick Gnaegy/President ob.TELEPHONE NUMBER Sc.E-MAIL ADDRESS Mix'd Greens, Inc. Office(305)245-1722 mixdgreens(5 bellsouth.net Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. Cell(305)345-6108 8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 3b YR.ESTABLISHED 3c.DUNS N/A 1977> Mix'd Greens,Inc. #60 3536 558 2009> Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc.#83 0777 509 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE O=FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees -. a. Profile Code b Experience Code Fla! Sae be Cii. 39 Landscape Architect 12 4-10 Miami-Dade County Vendor:> 4 (Arborist) A03>Agricultural Development;Grain Storage; Farm 1 Mechanization E12>Environmental Remediation 4 F06>Forestry&Forest products 3 106>Irrigation; Drainage 4 R11>Rivers;Canals;Waterways; Flood Control 4 Other Employees U.S.Total 12 4-10 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX SER REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than 3 100.000 6. 32 million to less than S5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) ' 100.S O C to less than 5250 000 ? �, r�licn to less than�10 million l ton a.Federal Work 3 3050 000 to less than$500.000 3 310-rallion to less than 325 million b.Non-Federal Work 4 4. 3500,000 to less than S1 million 3. 325 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 4 5. 31 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a .3 I0: P,E b Dn,T= October24,2014 c_NAME AND T!TLE Mick Gnaegy, President STANDARD FORM STANDARD=0RM 3300'20.7.- 60 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH !. Professional Architecturat and Engineering Services AECOM 2•3 Financial Capacity AECOM is a 100%publicly owned corporation that is traded on the New York Stock Exchange(NYSE). Should we be awarded the City of Miami Beach Professional Architectural and Engineering Services contract,our firm has the financial and staff capacity to complete the project. In the link below,you can find our most recently filed 10-K which includes a full copy of our audited financials publicly filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission:http://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/868857/000104746913010484/a2217354z10-k.htm • AECOM NR 13-1101 Media Contact: Investor Contact: Paul Gennaro Lynn Antipas Tyson SVP&Chief Communications Officer SVP,Investor Relations 212.973.3167 646.432.8428 Paul.Gennaropaecom corn !vnn Tvsoneaecom.com AECOM reports fourth-quarter,full-year fiscal year 2013 results Quarter and Full-Year Highlights* • Free cash flow of$145 million; $356 million for full-year fiscal 2013. • Backlog of$16.6 billion with$1.8 billion in new wins in the quarter. • EBITDA margin of 11.6 percent,9.4 percent for full-year fiscal 2013. • Full-year company invests$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares. • Reported EPS of$0.77,full-year fiscal 2013 EPS of$2.35. • Company targets full-year diluted EPS of$2.35 to$2.45 for fiscal year 2014. LOS ANGELES(Nov.12,2013)—AECOM Technology Corporation(NYSE:ACM)reported fourth-quarter revenue of$2.1 billion and net service revenue', of$1.2 billion. Operating income equaled$123 million, reported net income2 was$77 million, and diluted earnings per share equaled$0.77. Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year YOY% ($in millions,except EPS) _ Q4 FY12 Q4 FY13 Change FY12 FY13 YOY%Change Reported Figures _ Gross Revenue 2,083 2,079 - 8,218 8,153 (1) Net Service Revenue(NSR)1 1,340 1,244 (7) 5,184 4,977 (4) Operating Income (199) 123 NM 54 377 603 Net Income2 (225) 77 NM (59) 239 NM Earnings per Share2 (2.05) 0.77 NM (0.52) 2.35 NM Operating Cash Flow 226 160 (29) 433 409 (6) Free Cash Flow3 211 145 (31) 370 _ 356 (4) Adjusted Fi ures for FY12 Operating Income 137 123 (10) 390 377 (3) Net Income2 92 77 (17) 259 239 (7) Earnings per Share2 0.83 0.77 (7) 2.30 2.35 2 'In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012,the company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of$2.88 per share or$317 million net of tax. All growth comparisons that follow in the text of the release are adjusted to exclude the impact of the goodwill charge;all comparisons are also year over year unless noted otherwise. "During fiscal year 2013,we increased our mix of revenue and profits from emerging markets,enhanced our technical and leadership capabilities in high-growth end markets, and implemented strategic account management teams to better serve our multinational clients,"said John M. Dionisio,AECOM chairman and chief executive officer. "Our diverse geographic footprint allows us to manage through various macroeconomic conditions around the globe." --more-- AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 61 AECOM 2-2-2 "Our commitment to deploying capital to its best and highest use supported our investment of$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares of our stock in fiscal year 2013,"said AECOM President Michael S. Burke. "We also invested$82 million in niche acquisitions that expanded our geographic reach in key emerging geographies. Lastly,we launched AECOM Capital, a platform that allows us to play an important role in providing financing as well as design and construction services to our clients." New Wins and Backlog New wins in the quarter of$1.8 billion were driven by strength in the company's transportation and water businesses. From a geographic perspective, new wins were led by Europe,Asia and the Americas. The company's book-to-burn ratio4 was 0.9X for the quarter,with total backlog at Sept.30, 2013, of$16.6 billion, up three percent. These results demonstrate the underlying strength of AECOM's business as clients increasingly turn to the company for its integrated service platform and global expertise. Business Segments • In addition to providing consolidated financial results,AECOM reports separate financial information for its two segments: Professional Technical Services(PTS) and Management Support Services(MSS). Professional Technical Services The PTS segment delivers planning, consulting, architecture and engineering design, as well as program and construction management services to institutional,commercial and public sector clients worldwide. Revenue of$1.9 billion was up 2 percent, and net service revenue(NSR), declined 5.8 percent to$1.1 billion as declines in the Americas and Australia on an NSR basis were only partially offset by double-digit gains in emerging geographies, such as the Middle East and Asia, as well as solid growth in Europe. Construction services also posted gains in the quarter. Operating income declined 3.5 percent in the quarter, however, operating income margin increased on both a sequential and year-over-year basis,aided by improved cost and efficiencies. Management Support Services The MSS segment provides program and facilities management and maintenance,training, logistics, consulting, technical assistance and systems integration services, primarily for agencies of the U.S. government. Revenue declined 15.6 percent to$220 million, and net service revenue declined 17.1 percent to$134 million. As expected, these results reflect actions to reposition away from lower-margin projects to new, higher-margin services—and these actions have improved MSS segment margins throughout the year. Operating profit declined 25.1 percent in the quarter; however,on a full-year basis, operating profit increased 50.4 percent aided by a 284-basis-point increase in operating income margin, consistent with the company's strategy to improve the profitability of this segment. Tax Rate The company's fourth-quarter effective tax rate was 31.8 percent, with a full-year rate of 27.9 percent, inclusive of non- controlling interest deduction. --more-- 62 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM AECOM 3-3-3 Cash Flow Cash flow from operations for the quarter was$160 million and$409 million for the full year. Free cash flow, which includes capital expenditures of$15 million in the quarter and$52 million for the full year,was$145 million and $356 million, respectively. Days sales outstanding(DSO)improved by three days to 88 in the quarter. Share Repurchase During the quarter,the company invested$61.6 million to repurchase 2 million shares. On a full-year basis,the company invested$373 million to repurchase 14.4 million shares. $365 million remains in the company's current share repurchase authorization as of the end of the company's fiscal 2013 year. Balance Sheet As of Sept. 30, 2013,AECOM had $601 million of total cash and cash equivalents, $1.2 billion of debt and$1.05 billion in committed bank facilities with$899.8 million in unused capacity. Fiscal 2014 Outlook AECOM is targeting EPS for fiscal year 2014 of$2.35 to$2.45. The mid-point of the guidance range assumes flat NSR growth and stable EBITDA margin. In addition,the company is targeting a full-year tax rate of 29 percent and a full-year share count of 99 million shares. The company expects the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to be similar to last year as a percentage of our full-year earnings. Five-Year Free Cash Flow Target AECOM reaffirms its five-year cumulative free cash flow target of$1.3 billion to$1.8 billion,which includes fiscal years 2013 through fiscal 2017. AECOM is hosting a conference call today at 11 a.m. EST,during which management will make a brief presentation focusing on the company's results, strategies and operating trends. Interested parties can listen to the conference call and view accompanying slides via webcast at www.aecom.com. The webcast will be available for replay following the call. 1AECOM's revenue includes a significant amount of pass-through costs and,therefore,the company believes that revenue, net of other direct costs(net service revenue,or NSR),which is a non-GAAP measure,also provides a meaningful perspective on its business results. See the accompanying reconciliation of revenue,net of other direct costs,to revenue,the closest comparable GAAP measure. 2Attributable to AECOM. 3Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and is a non-GAAP measure. See the accompanying reconciliation of free cash flow from operations,to cash flow from operations,the closest comparable GAAP measure. 4Book-to-burn ratio is defined as the amount of gross revenue wins divided by gross revenue recognized during the period. About AECOM AECOM is a global provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation,facilities,environmental, energy,water and government. With approximately 45,000 employees around the world,AECOM is a leader in all of the key markets that it serves. AECOM provides a blend of global reach, local knowledge, innovation and technical excellence in delivering solutions that create, enhance and sustain the world's built, natural,and social environments. A Fortune 500 company,AECOM serves clients in more than 140 countries and had revenue of$8.2 billion during the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2013. More information on AECOM and its services can be found at www.aecom.com. Forward-Looking Statements:All statements in this press release other than statements of historical fact are"forward looking statements"for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including any projections of earnings, revenue, profit margins, cash flows, share count or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; and any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward looking statements are reasonable,actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward looking statements. --more-- AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services 63 AECOM 4-4-4 Important factors that could cause our actual results, performance and achievements,or industry results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in forward-looking statements include: uncertainties related to global economic conditions and funding, audits, modifications and termination of long-term government contracts; losses under fixed-price contracts; limited control over operations run through our joint venture entities;misconduct by our employees or consultants or our failure to comply with laws or regulations;failure to successfully execute our merger and acquisition strategy;the failure to retain and recruit key technical and management personnel; and unexpected adjustments and cancellations related to our backlog. Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward looking statements are set forth in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend,and undertake no obligation,to update any forward looking statement. This press release contains financial information calculated other than in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles("GAAP"). In particular,the company believes that non-GAAP financial measures such as revenue, net of other direct costs,and free cash flow also provide a meaningful perspective on its business results as the company utilizes this information to evaluate and manage the business. This non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for financial information determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the company's results as reported under GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. —more-- 64 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH i Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM 5-5-5 AECOM Technology Corporation , - Consolidated Statement of Income - (unaudited.-in thousands,except per share data) - - _ • Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended September 30, _September 30, September 30, September 30, 2012 ' 2013 %Changer 2012 2013 %Change Revenue $ 2,082,911 $ 2,079,087 (0.2%) $ 8,218,180 $ 8,153,495 (0.8%) Other direct costs 742,785 • 834,968 12.4% - 3,034,303 3,176,520 4.7% Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 1,340,126 1,244,119 (7.2%). 5,183,877 4,976,975 (4.0%) Cost of revenue, net of other direct costs 1,195,968 1,103,906 (7.7%) -4,762,018 4,526,987 (4.9%) Gross profit 144;158 ' 140,213 (2.7%)' _ 421,859 449,988 6.7% Equity in earnings of joint ventures 10,509 6,464 (38.5%): • 48;650 24,319 (50.0%) General and administrative expenses (17,753) (23;953) 34.9% ..(80,903) (97,318) 20.3% Goodwill impairment (336,000) — . (100.0%). (336,000) — (100.0%) Income from operations. •. (.199,086) 122,724, NM 53,606 376,989 603.3% Other income - 1,963 1,480 (24.6%). •'10,603 3,522 (66.8%) Interest(expense) (10,999) •(10,242) (6.9%) (46,726) (44,737) (4.3%) Income(loss)before income tax expense . (208,122) 113,962 NM 17,483 335,774 1820.6% • Income tax expense 16;746 35,735 113.4% 74,416 92,578 24.4% Net income(loss) - (224,868) , 78;227 NM (56,933) 243,196 NM Noncontrolling interest in income of consolidated . . - subsidiaries,net of tax. (37) (1;659) 4383.8%0 (.1,634) . (3,953) 141.9% Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM . $ (224;905) $ , 76,568 NM $ (58,567) $ 239,243 NM Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM'per share: Basic = • $ :(2.05) $ 0.78 NM •$ ' (0.52) $ 2.38 NM Diluted - $ (2.05) $ _ 0.77 NM $ (0.52) $ 2.35 NM t Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic - 109,962 - ,98,028 (10.9%) 111,875 100,618 (10.1%) Diluted 109,962 99,652 (9.4%) :111;875 101,942 (8.9%) NM—Not meaningful = . —more-- AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH-I Professional.4rcnitectural and engineering Services 65 • AECOM: 6-6-6 , • , AECOM Technology Corporation; ,, Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Information - (unaudited-in thousands).. _ • - September 30,2012''- • September 30,2013 Balance Sheet Information: Total cash and cash equivalents. $: 593,776 $ 600,677 - -.Accounts receivable-net 2,395,881 - 2,342,262 Working capital - ' '1,068,891 _ 1,078,053 o c Working capital,net of cash and cash equivalents 475,115` = 477,376 Total debt . , 1,069,732 - • 1,173,325 - Total assets - - , 5,664,568 5,665,623 Total AECOM stockholders'equity 2,169,464 2,021,443 • Three Months Ended ' . 'Twelve Months Ended , September 30, September 30, -'September 30, September 30, 2012 2013 2012 2013 Cash Flow Information: - Net cash provided by operating activities $ 226,389 $ 160,147;_ i $ 433,352 $ 408,598 Payments for capital`expenditures . -. • (15,069) (15,050).: - (62,874) (52,117) ' Free cash flow $ 211,320 $ 145,097 $ 370,478 $ 356,481 --more- • • 66 s CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services. AECOM AECOM 7-7-7 , AECOM Technology Corporation , . - ., Reportable Segments . - (unaudited-in thousands) Professional. . .Management- - Technical: Support - - . Services Services: . . Corporate Total Three Months Ended September 30,2013 , Revenue - • $ 1,858,660 $. --220,427 $, - .$ -- 2,079,087 Other direct costs 748,363 • 86,605 • ,-.. 834,968 Revenue,net of other direct costs,(non-GAAP) 1;110,297 . 133,822 - 1,244,119 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs' - • 974,677 129,229 1,103,906 Gross profit 135,620 4,593 • - 140,213 Equity in earnings of joint ventures - 2,051. - `4,413 -.-' 6,464 General and administrative expenses . ,. • -- (23,953) (23,953) Income(loss)from operations "._ . • $ _137,671 $ 9,006 $ (23,953) $ 122,724 Gross profit as a%of revenue 7:3% " 2.1% - 6.7% Gross profit as a%.of revenue,net of,other direct costs(non-GAAP) 12.2% 3.4% 11.3% Three Months Ended.September 30,2012 Revenue $ 1,821',822 $ 261,089 $ - ,•$ 2,082,911 Other direct costs • . 643,074_ . '-99,711 - 742,785 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 1,178,748 161;378 - 1,340,126 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs - 1,040,333 155,635 - • 1,195,968 Gross profit 138,415. " - 5,743 - --• . 144,158 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 4,224 6,285 . - 10,509 General and administrative expenses - (17,753)' • (17,753)• Goodwill impairment ' (155;000) (181,000) , - : (336,000) (Loss)from operations • $ . (12,361) $ (168,972) $ -(17,753) $ (199,086) Gross profit as a%of revenue 7.6% •. .2:2% • - "- 6.9% Gross profit as a%of revenue,-net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 11.7% . " 3.6% - 10.8% --more-- .. . • . AECOM , CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services - - 67 . . C�M • 8-8-8 AECOM Technology Corporation Reportable Segments - .. • (unaudited .in thousands) Professional Management . . - - Technical Support • Services Services ' _ Corporate Total Twelve Months Ended September 30,-203 - ‘ - _ ' Revenue $ 7,242,859 $ .. 910-636 ,$ . - $ 8,153,495 Other direct costs = _ -' • . - 2,826,452 350,068.:= - 3,176,520 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) . - 4,416,407 560,568 - 4,976,975 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs-.' - - , 3,999,523 527,464-. 4,526,987 :- Gross profit - • •. 416,884 • 33,104 ' 449,988 Equity in earnings of joint ventures 12,356 - 11- ,963 , 24,319 General and administrative expenses-- (97,318) (97,318) • Income(loss)from operations_ $ - 429,240 $ . .`45;067' $ (97,318) $ 376,989 Gross profit as a%of revenue - - 5:8% 3.6%: -' • 5.5% Gross profit as a%o•of'revenue,net of other direct costs(non=GAAP)• 9.4% 5.9% 9.0% Segment assets. $ 5,761,057 $ - 541;887 • $ - _(637,321) $- 5,665,623 Contracted backlog`. - $ 8;378;426 $ 374,87.1 ` $. .:.... - $ 8,753,297 Awarded backlog '. . 6,886,068 914,011 - 7,800,079 Total backlog $' • 15,264,494 $ 1,288,882 '$ - $ 16,553,376 Twelve Months Ended September.30,2012-, - Revenue $ 7,276,858 $ •941,322 $ ,• . $ 8,218,180 Other direct costs - 2,669,534= 364,769 ,- 3,034,303 Revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) _ 4,607;324 , 576,553 5,183,877 Cost of revenue,net of other direct costs: 4,183,552 578;466 - 4,762,018 Gross profit •• '423,772 (1,913) - - - 421,859• Equity in earnings of joint ventures 16,771 31,879 ' - 48,650 General and administrative expenses•' - - (80903) (80,903) Goodwill impairment (155,000) ` . (181,000) - (336,000) Income(loss)from operations' $ 285,543 $ (151,034) ` $. ' (80,903) . .$ 53,606 Gross profit as a%of revenue - 5:8%. 0:2% - • 5.1% Gross profit as a%of revenue,net of other direct costs(non-GAAP) 9.2% -0.3% •- - -. • 8.1 Segment assets. $ 5,557 153 $ •564,834, $` - (457,419) $ 5,664,568 Contracted backlog. _ $ 7,661,021 $ . ; 838,146 ._ •$: -$ 8,499,167 Awarded backlog : 6,323,970 1,194,748 - 7,518,718 Total backlog $ 13,984,991 $ 2,032,894 $ - $ 16,017,885 • • • - 68 - CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional"Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM AECOM 9-9-9 AECOM Technology Corporation Regulation G Information ($in millions,except per share data) Reconciliation of Revenue to Revenue,Net of Other Direct Costs Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2012 Jun 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Sep 30,2012 Sep 30,2013 Consolidated Revenue $ 2,082.9 $ 2,067.5 $ 2,079.1 $ 8,218.2 $ 8,153.5 Less:Other direct costs 742.8 831.5 835.0 3,034.3 3,176.5 Revenue,net of other direct costs $ 1,340.1 $ 1,236.0 $ 1,244.1 $ 5,183.9 $ 4,977.0 PTS Segment Revenue $ 1,821.8 $ 1,847.1 $ 1,858.7 $ 7,276.9 $ 7,242.9 Less:Other direct costs 643.1 745.1 748.4 2,669.6 2,826.5 Revenue,net of other direct costs $ 1,178.7 $ 1,102.0 $ 1,110.3 $ 4,607.3 $ 4,416.4 MSS Segment Revenue $ 261.1 $ 220.4 $ 220.4 $ 941.3 $ 910.6 Less:Other direct costs 99.7 86.4 86.6 364.7 350.0 Revenue,net of other direct costs $ 161.4 $ 134.0 $ 133.8 $ 576.6 $ 560.6 Reconciliation of Income from Operations Before Goodwill Impairment to Income from Operations Three Months Ended Sep 30,2012 Consolidated PTS MSS Corporate Income(loss)from operations before goodwill impairment $ 136.9 $ 142.6 $ 12.0 $ (17.7) Goodwill impairment (336.0) (155.0) (181.0) - Loss from operations $ (199.1) $ (12.4) $ (169.0) $ (17.7) Reconciliation of Net Income and Diluted EPS Before Goodwill Impairment to Net Income and Diluted EPS Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2012 Sep 30,2012 Net Income Net Income • Attributable Attributable Net Income to AECOM Diluted EPS Net Income to AECOM Diluted EPS Amount before goodwill impairment $ 92.3 $ 92.3 $ 0.83 $ 260.3 $ 258.6 $ 2.30 Goodwill impairment,net of tax (317.2) (317.2) (2.88) (317.2) (317.2) (2.82) Amount including goodwill impairment $ (224.9) $ (224.9) $ (2.05) $ (56.9) $ (58.6) $ (0.52) Reconciliation of Amounts Provided by Acquired Companies, Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Sep 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Provided by Excluding Effect Provided by Excluding Effect Acquired of Acquired Acquired of Acquired Total Companies Companies Total Companies Companies Revenue,net of other direct costs-Consolidated $ 1,244.1 $ 38.0 $ 1,206.1 $ 4,977.0 $ 128.3 $ 4,848.7 Revenue,net of other direct costs-PTS Segment 1,110.3 38.0 1,072.3 4,416.4 128.3 4,288.1 --more-- r AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH i Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 69 A=COM 10-10-10 AECOM Technology Corporation Regulation G Information ($in millions,except per share data) Reconciliation of EBITDA Before Goodwill Impairment to Net Income Attributable to AECOM Three Months Ended Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 EBITDA before goodwill impairment $ 103.0 $ 101.6 $ 129.0 $ 163.9 $ 84.7 $ 102.5 $ 135.1 $ 144.5 Less: Goodwill impairment - - - (336.0) - - - - EBITDA 103.0 101.6 129.0 (172.1) 84.7 102.5 135.1 144.5 Less: Interest expense' (10.4) (11.0) (12.5) (10.4) (10.4) (11.3) (11.0) (9.6) Add: Interest income' 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Less: Depreciation and amortization (25.5) (25.3) (26.1) (26.1) (23.9) (23.9) (23.6) (23.0) Income(loss)attributable to AECOM before income taxes 67.5 65.7 90.8 (208.2) 50.8 67.8 100.9 112.3 Less: Income tax expense 19.6 16.7 21.4 16.7 12.7 14.0 30.1 35.8 Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM $ 47.9 $ 49.0 $ 69.4 $ (224.9) $ 38.1 $ 53.8 $ 70.8 $ 76.5 Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EBITDA before goodwill impairment $ 358.5 $ 417.5 $ 525.4 $ 497.5 $ 466.8 Less: Goodwill impairment - - - (336.0) - EBITDA 358.5 417.5 525.4 161.5 466.8 Less: Interest expense' (11.9) (10.7) (40.8) (44.3) (42.3) Add: Interest income' 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 Less: Depreciation and amortization (84.1) (78.9) (110.3) (103.0) (94.4) Income from continuing operations attributable to AECOM before income taxes 263.7 328.7 375.9 15.8 331.8 Less: Income tax expense 77.0 91.7 100.1 74.4 92.6 • Income(loss)from continuing operations attributable to AECOM 186.7 237.0 275.8 (58.6) 239.2 Discontinued operations,net of tax 3.0 (0.1) - - - Net income(loss)attributable to AECOM $_$ 236.9 $ 275.8 $ (58.6) 'Excluding related amortization 2 Included in other income Reconciliation of Total Debt to Net Debt Balances at Sep 30,2012 Jun 30,2013 Sep 30,2013 Short-term debt $ 1.6 $ 12.0 $ 29.6 Current portion of long-term debt 161.0 1.5 54.7 Long-term debt 907.1 1,135.2 1,089.0 Total debt 1,069.7 1,148.7 1,173.3 Less: Total cash and cash equivalents 593.8 507.6 600.7 Net Debt $ 475.9 $ 641.1 $ 572.6 Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow Three Months Ended Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, Dec 31, Mar 31, Jun 30, Sep 30, 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 Net cash provided by/(used in)operating activities $ (6.4) $ 11.4 $ 202.0 $ 226.4 $ 67.1 $ 85.2 $ 96.1 $ 160.2 Capital expenditures (18.3) (13.9) (15.6) (15.1) (12.9) (11.7) (12.4) (15.1) Free Cash Flow $ (24.7) $ (2.5) $ 186.4 $ 211.3 $ 54.2 $ 73.5 $ 83.7 $ 145.1 Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 228.6 $ 158.6 $ 132.0 $ 433.4 $ 408.6 Capital expenditures (62.9) (68.5) (78.0) (62.9) (52.1) Settlement of deferred compensation plan liability - - 90.0 - - Excess tax benefit from share-based payment(associated with DCP termination) - - 58.0 - - Free Cash Flow $ 165.7 $ 90.1 $ 202.0 $ 370.5 $ 356.5 70 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ; Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 1 of 13 DB Decide with Confidence Supplier Qualifier Report I Print this Report Copyright 2014 Dun&Bradstreet-Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 263159923 ATTN: Namel Report Printed: OCT 16 2014 In Date BUSINESS INFORMATION AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 555 S Flower St Ste 3700 Los Angeles, CA 90071 This is a headquarters location. D-U-N-S® Number: 15-356-1212 Branch(es)or division(s)exist. Telephone: 213 593-8000 t.41 D&B Rating: 5A2 Financial strength: 5A is$50 million and Fax: 213 593-8729 over. Composite credit Chief executive: MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES- appraisal: 2 is good. CEO D&B Supplier Risk: 1 Stock symbol: ACM SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK(SER) RATING FOR THIS FIRM : 1 Year started: 1980 V 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Employs: 45,500(400 here) All amounts are displayed in local currency. High Medium Low Financial statement date: JUN 30 2014 Sales F: 8,153,495,000 Net worth: 2,074,094,000 History: CLEAR • DNB!' Ddb Risk Management Financial condition: GOOD D&B PAYDEX® Dun&Bradstreet Supplier Qualifier Report: As requested,a copy of AECOM's Supplier D&B PAYDEX: 70 ''1 Qualifier Report(SQR)for AECOM When weighted by dollar amount,payments to 1 Technology Corporation(Parent Company) suppliers average 15 days beyond terms. and AECOM Technical Services, Inc. otoo (Contracting Entity)was sent to the City of �� Miami Beach on October 16,2014. 120 days stow 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates Based on up to 24 months of trade. https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ; ProfessionaLA-cnitectural and Engineering Services 71 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 2 of 13 SUMMARY ANALYSIS D&B Rating: 5A2 Financial strength: 5A indicates$50 million and over. Composite credit appraisal: 2 is good. This credit rating was assigned because of D&B's assessment of the company's financial ratios and its cash flow. For more information,see the D&B Rating Key. Below is an overview of the company's rating history since 01/27/05: D&B Rating Date Applied 5A2 11/24/11 5A3 04/14/11 5A2 03/21/11 5A3 09/17/10 5A2 01/02/08 -- 07/11/07 5A3 08/07/06 1R3 07/17/06 5A3 07/15/05 5A2 01/27/05 The Summary Analysis section reflects information in D&B's file as of October 13, 2014. RISK SCORE ANALYSIS SER COMMENTARY: - Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported. - Financial ratios. - Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry. PROBABILITY OF CEASED OPERATIONS/BECOMING INACTIVE SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK RATING: 1 The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S. businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 months. Probability of Supplier Ceased 1.3% (130 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive: Percentage,of US business with same SER 13% (1,300 PER 10,000) score: Average Probability of Supplier Ceased 5.60% (560 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive: -Average of Businesses in D&B's Supplier Database CREDIT DELINQUENCY SCORE: 485 DIVERSITY Minority-Owned Business: N/A Historically Underutilized Business: N/A Women-Owned Business: N/A Veteran-Owned Business: N/A https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 72 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 3 of 13 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: N/A Vietnam Veteran Business: N/A Small Disadvantaged Business: N/A Disabled-Owned Business: N/A HUB-Zoned Certified Business: N/A Historical College Classification: N/A SBA 8(a)Certified: N/A Labor surplus area: YES (2014) Small Business: N/A SPECIAL EVENTS 09/12/2014 STOCK/BOND ISSUANCE/REDEMPTION/REPURCHASE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced its intention to offer,subject to market and other conditions, US$1.6 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior notes maturing in 2022 and 2024. 08/06/2014 EARNINGS UPDATE:According to published reports,comparative operating results for the 9 months ended June 30, 2014: Revenue of$6,074,408,000,Net Income of$164,969,000; compared to Revenue of$5,794,254,000, Net Income of$168,129,000 for the comparable period in the prior year. 07/30/2014 MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,Aecom Technology Corp., DUNS 153561212, (Los Angeles, CA)announced that it has acquired Hunt Construction Group, DUNS 006938179, (Scottsdale,AZ). 07/25/2014 The Chief Executive Officer is now MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES-CEO. 07/17/2014 DUNS 1 1212 MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation, DU S 5356 , (Los Angeles,CA)announced that it has taken over CE International Consultants SL,for an undisclosed price. 07/14/2014 ANNOUNCED MERGER/ACQUISITION:According to published reports,Aecom Technology Corp., DUNS 153561212, (Los Angeles, CA)announced that it is buying URS Corp., DUNS 043271568, (San Francisco,CA)for$4 billion in cash and stock,or about$56.31 per URS share. 06/19/2014 BOARD OF DIRECTORS UPDATE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that Clarence T. Schmitz has joined its Board of Directors. 05/21/2014 OFFICER CHANGE:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that it has appointed Rick Heinick as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. 01/17/2014 GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:According to published reports,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that it has been awarded an approximately US$13-million consultancy contract for the design and an estimated US$103-million contract for the construction supervision of the Tseung Kwan 0 Lam Tin(TKO-LT)Tunnel project in Hong Kong.The TKO-LT Tunnel will include a 2.6-mile,two-lane highway connecting Tseung Kwan 0(TKO)at Po Shun Road in the east with the proposed Trunk Road T2 in Kai Tak Development in the west. 01/13/2014 ANNOUNCED CHIEF EXECUTIVE CHANGE:According to published reports on December 12, 2013,AECOM Technology Corporation announced that its Board of Directors has elected AECOM President Michael S Burke to succeed John M Dionisio as CEO, as part of a planned succession process. Dionisio will become Executive CHB when Burke succeeds him as CEO,and joins AECOM's Board of Directors on March 6, 2014. CUSTOMER SERVICE If you have questions about this report, please call our Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 V from anywhere within the U.S. If you are outside the U.S. contact your local D&B office. ***Additional Decision Support Available*** Additional D&B products,monitoring services and specialized investigations are available to help you evaluate this https://www.supplierriskrnanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 73 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 4 of 13 company or its industry. Call Dun&Bradstreet's Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 t9 from anywhere within the U.S. or visit our website at www.dnb.com. HISTORY The following information was reported 08/21/2014: Officer(s): MICHAEL S BURKE, PRES-CEO JOHN M. DIONISIO,CHB JANE A CHMIELINSKI,COO STEPHEN M KADENACY,CFO RICK HEINICK, EVP-CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER DIRECTOR(S): The officers identified by(+)and Francis S Y Bong,James H Fordyce, S Malcolm Gillis, Linda Griego, David W Joos, Richard G Newman,William G Ouchi, Robert J Routs,William P Rutledge, Daniel R.Tishman and Clarence T. Schmitz. The Delaware Secretary of State's business registrations file showed that AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION was registered as a Corporation on January 31, 1980. Business started 1980. The company started its operations in 1980 as Ashland Technology Company, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ashland,Inc. and later on April 6, 1990,an ESOP was formed for the employees of the company to purchased 58%of the capital stock of Ashland Technology Corp from Ashland Oil Inc.Ashland Oil Inc retained a 42%interest in the capital stock. Subsequent sale of common stock to management and employees later eliminated Ashland Oil's stake in the business.On April 6, 1990,AECOM evolved to an independent firm formed by the merger of five Ashland entities. Since then, more than 30 companies have joined AECOM and in 2007,the company became a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange. The company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol"ACM".As of November 7, 2013,there were 1,850 stockholders of record.As of January 6, 2014,the most recent date available,those shareholders identified by the company as beneficially owning 5%or more of the outstanding shares were: FMR LLC (16.60%); Bank of America Merrill Lynch (7.80%); BlackRock, Inc. (5.74%) and The Vanguard Group(5.50%). As of the same date,officers and directors as a group beneficially owned 3.77%of the outstanding shares. RECENT EVENT: On August 21, 2014, Brendan Ranson-Walsh,Vice President of Communications, Construction Services of Aecom, stated that Aecom Technology Corp., Los Angeles,CA,through its wholly owned subsidiary,AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Los Angeles,CA, has acquired The Hunt Corporation, Scottsdale,AZ,on July 29, 2014. With the acquisition,The Hunt Corporation will now operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The Hunt Corporation is the parent company of Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Scottsdale,AZ.Terms were undisclosed. On July 25, 2014, sources stated that AECOM Technology Corporation, Los Angeles,CA, has announced that ACE International Consultants S.L., Madrid, Spain, has joined its international development business, on July 10, 2014. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Further details are unavailable. MICHAEL S BURKE. He has served as the company's President since October 2011. He previously served as CFO from December 2006 to September 2011 and Executive Vice President from May 2006 to December 2006. He also served as Chief Corporate Officer from May 2006 to January 2009. He joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy in October 2005. From 1990 to 2005, he was with the accounting firm KPMG LLP. He served in various senior leadership positions, most recently as a Western Area Managing Partner from 2002 to 2005. JOHN M. DIONISIO. Was appointed CHB in October 2011 and has served as CEO since October 2005. He previously served as President from October 2005 to September 2011 and was elected to the Board of Directors in December 2005. From October 2003 to October 2005, he served as Executive Vice President and COO. JANE A CHMIELINSKI. She has served as the company's COO since October 2011. She previously served as Executive Vice President, Chief Corporate Officer from January 2009 to September 2011. She also served as Group Chief Executive for Corporate Development from January 2008 to January 2009,after serving as President and COO of DMJM+Harris operation since October 2005. STEPHEN M KADENACY. He was appointed CFO in October 2011. He previously served as Senior Vice President, https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 74 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professioiat Arciitecturai arld Engiiee' ig Services AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 5 of 13 Corporate Finance from May 2008 to September 2011. Prior to joining the company, he was with the accounting firm KPMG LLP since 1996. RICK HEINICK.Joins AECOM from Bausch + Lomb, where he served as CHRO and head of transformation. OPERATIONS 08/21/2014 Description: The Company provides professional technical and management support services. It provides planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design and program and construction management services for a broad range of projects, including highways,airports, bridges, mass transit systems, government and commercial buildings, water and wastewater facilities and power transmission and distribution. It also provides program and facilities management and maintenance,training, logistics,security and other support services, primarily for agencies of the US government. Terms are Net 30 days. Sells to commercial concerns and government entities.Territory : International. Season peaks July 1 to Sep 30. Business slow Oct 1 to Dec 31. Employees: 45,500 which includes officer(s). 400 employed here. Facilities: Leases 64,000 sq.ft. in a building. Location: Central business section on main street. Branches: This business has multiple branches, detailed branch information is available in D&B's linkage or family tree products. Subsidiaries:This business has multiple subsidiaries, detailed subsidiary information is available in D&B's linkage or family tree products. FAMILY LINKAGE This business is at the head of its corporate family tree. It is not a subsidiary of any other business. UNSPSC UNSPSC(United Nations Standard Product and Services Code) is a globally accepted commodity(Product and Services)classification system.AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION offers the following product(s)and service(s): 81100000 Professional engineering services 81101508 Architectural engineering NAICS Beginning in 1997,the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)was replaced by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).This six digit code is a major revision that not only provides for newer industries, but also reorganizes the categories on a production/process-oriented basis.This new, uniform, industry-wide classification system has been designed as the index for statistical reporting of all economic activities of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. 541330 Engineering Services 541310 Architectural Services SIC Based on information in our file, D&B has assigned this company an extended 8-digit SIC. D&B's use of 8-digit SICs enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than if we use the standard 4-digit code. https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ProfessionalArcnitectu•al and Engineering Services 75 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 6 of 13 87110000 Engineering services 87120101 Architectural engineering D&B PAYDEX The D&B PAYDEX is a unique,dollar weighted indicator of payment performance based on up to 182 payment experiences as reported to D&B by trade references. 3-Month D&B PAYDEX: 69 ,D&B PAYDEX: 70 When weighted by dollar amount, payments to When weighted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 16 days beyond terms. , suppliers average 15 days beyond terms. o 100 0 100 120 days slow 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates 120 days slow 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates Based on trade collected over last 3 months. Based on up to 24 months of trade. When dollar amounts are not considered,then approximately 79%of the company's payments are 1 within terms. PAYMENT SUMMARY The Payment Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report. Below is an overview of the company's dollar-weighted payments,segmented by its suppliers' primary industries: Total Total Dollar Largest High Within Days Slow Rcv'd Amts Credit Terms <31 31-60 61-90 90> (#) ($) ($) (%) (%) Top industries: Public finance 12 63,750 30,000 100 - - - - Misc business service 9 108,250 40,000 98 2 - ; - - Misc equipment rental 6 1,409,500 700,000 100 - - - - Mfg computers 6 1,155,000 700,000 50 9 41 - - Security broker/deal 4 500,150 500,000 100 - - - - Misc business credit 4 600,500 300,000 100 - - ` - - Whol computers/softwr 3 402,500 300,000 25 - 74 - 1 Short-trm busn credit 3 80,050 55,000 66 34 - - - Help supply service 2 202,500 200,000 - 1 - - 99 Radiotelephone commun 1 100,000 100,000 100 - - - - OTHER INDUSTRIES 82 322,450 35,000 71 9 5 - 15 Other payment categories: Cash experiences 47 7,550 1,000 Payment record unknown 2 2,000,500 2,000,000 Unfavorable comments 1 1,000 1,000 Placed for collections: With D&B 0 0 Other 0 N/A Total in D&B's file 182 6,953,700 2,000,000 The highest Now Owes on file is$2,000,000 The highest Past Due on file is$300,000 https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 -"3 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professio,a:A-:'tsctJ a.3-d E^gilee•H^.bServices AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 7 of 13 Dun&Bradstreet has 182 payment experiences in its file for this company. For your convenience,we have displayed 80 representative experiences in the PAYMENTS section. PAYMENT DETAILS Detailed payment history Date Reported Paying Record High Credit Now Owes Past Due Selling Terms Last Sale (mm/yy) ($) ($) ($) Within (months) 10/14 Ppt 200,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 100,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 7,500 1,000 Lease Agreemnt Ppt 1,000 250 Lease Agreemnt Ppt 750 250 Lease Agreemnt Slow 120 2,500 2,500 2,500 09/14 Ppt 500 0 1 mo Ppt 700,000 100,000 0 Lease Agreemnt 1 mo Ppt 100,000 5,000 0 N30 1 mo Ppt 10,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 2,500 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt 2,500 . 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 2,500 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt 1,000 0: 0 1 mo Ppt 500 250 0 1 mo Ppt 250 100 0 1 mo Ppt 250 0' 0 N30 1 mo Ppt 250 0 , 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt 250 0; 0 4-5 mos Ppt 250 50 _' 0 4-5 mos Ppt 250 0 . 0 6-12 mos Ppt 250 100 0 1 mo Ppt 250 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 250 100 0 1 mo Ppt 250 0 0 N30 2-3 mos Ppt 250 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt 250 0 0 1 mo Ppt 250 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt 50 0 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt 50 0 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt 50 0 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt 50 0 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 30 15,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 30 500 0 0 1 mo Ppt-Slow 60 250,000 250,000 200,000 1 mo Ppt-Slow 60 7,500 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt-Slow 60 1,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 120 15,000 15,000 15,000 4-5 mos Slow 30 100,000 0 0 6-12 mos Slow 30 2,500 2,500 0 1 mo https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?-ofessio la:A-.^ita_*_J-a.3^o E,g 'ae'ingSew,:as 77 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 8 of 13 Slow 30-60 250 250 Slow 100 200,000 100,000 60,000 1 mo Slow 120+ 500 500 500 (044) 0 : 0 0 Cash account 6-12 mos 08/14 Ppt 35,000 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 20,000 20,000 0 1 mo Ppt 15,000 0 0 4-5 mos Ppt 15,000 15,000 0 1 mo Ppt 15,000 7,500 0 1 mo Ppt 2,500 . 2,500 0 1 mo Ppt 750 100 0 6-12 mos Ppt 750 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 500 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 250 0 6-12 mos Ppt 50 ' 50 ' 0 1 mo Ppt 50 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 0 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 0 0+ 0 6-12 mos Ppt 0 0 ; 0 6-12 mos Ppt 0 0 0 6-12 mos Slow 20 250 0 0 N30 4-5 mos 07/14 (062) 1001 Cash account 1 mo A A Cash own option. • 06/14 Ppt 5,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 30 5,000 2,500 1,000 1 mo 05/14 Ppt 2,500 0 ' 0 6-12 mos Ppt 50 1 mo Ppt 50 1 mo Ppt 50 1 mo Ppt 50 ■ 1 mo 04/14 Ppt 50 1 mo 02/14 Ppt 5,000 5,000' 0 Lease Agreemnt 1 mo 01/14 Ppt 50 0` 0 6-12 mos (073) 1,000 1,000 1,000 A A Unsatisfactory. 12/13 Ppt 1,000 0 0 N90 2-3 mos Ppt 250 1 mo Ppt 250 1 mo Ppt 50 ! 0 0 6-12 mos Slow 30-60 750 500 500 N30 09/13 Ppt 25,000 0 . 0 6-12 mos 09/12 Ppt-Slow 30 55,000 0 0 2-3 mos Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of disputes over merchandise,skipped invoices etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. PAYMENT TRENDS SUPPLIER VERSUS INDUSTRY PAYDEX -> PRIOR 4 QTRS CURRENT 12 MONTH TREND https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 73 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 2rofessiona!A-clitectJ•ai aid_^g. ee-i^;Se-vices AECOM D&B Supplier Qualifier Report:AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 9 of 13 2012 2013 --- --- --- --- 2014 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- DEC MAR JUN SEP NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Supplier 75 72 74 74 78 78 78 78 77 76 77 78 76 76 78 70 PAYDEX Industry PAYDEX(Based on 46 establishments in SIC 8711) UP QRT 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 MEDIAN 78 78 79 78 78 78 78 79 LO QRT 73 73 74 74 73 73 72 73 PAYDEX scores are updated daily and are based on upto 13 months of trade experiences from the Dun&Bradstreet trade file. All amounts displayed within this report are in local currency. STATEMENT UPDATE 08/07/2014 Interim Consolidated statement dated JUN 30 2014: Assets Liabilities Cash 510,147,000 Accts Pay 704,981,000 Accts Rec 2,431,517,000 Short-Term Debt 27,922,000 Prepaid Exps&Other Current 150,842,000 L.T. Liab-(1yr) 38,540,000 Assets Income Taxes Receivable 9,355,000 Accrued Exps&Other Current 930,693,000 Liabs Deferred Tax Assets-Net 19,949,000 Billings In Excess Of Costs 351,724,000 Curr Assets 3,121,810,000 Curr Liabs 2,053,860,000 Fixt&Equip 278,780,000 Long-Term Debt 976,963,000 Deferred Tax Assets-Net 117,090,000 L.T. Liab-Other 439,446,000 Investments-Other 133,766,000 COMMON STOCK 964,000 Goodwill 1,896,371,000 ADDIT. PD.-IN CAP 1,848,344,000 Intangible Assets-Net 86,717 000 ACCUM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (264,951,000) ' LOSS Other Assets 119,208,000 RETAINED EARNINGS 613,155,000 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS 85,961,000 Total Assets 5,753,742,000 Total 5,753,742,000 From OCT 01 2013 to JUN 30 2014 sales$5,794,254,000; cost of goods sold $5,520,109,000. Gross profit $274,145,000; operating expenses$23,783,000. Operating income$250,362,000; other income$856,000; other expenses$33,023,000; net income before taxes$218,195,000; Federal income tax$52,367,000; net income $165,828,000. Statement obtained from Securities And Exchange Commission. Prepared from books without audit. Accounts receivable shown net less$72,300,000 allowance. Explanations The net worth of this company includes intangibles. FINANCE 01/13/2014 Three-year statement comparative: https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A-c testa a.31d ^as 79 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 10 of 13 Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated Sep 30 2011 Sep 30 2012 Sep 30 2013 Current Assets 2,990,066,000 3,147,293,000 3,131,602,000 Current Liabs 1,814,446,000 2,078,402,000 2,053,549,000 Current Ratio 1.65 1.51 1.52 Working Capital 1,175,620,000 1,068,891,000 1,078,053,000 Other Assets 2,799,262,000 2,517,275,000 2,534,021,000. Net Worth 2,395,137,000 2,224,488,000 2,074,094,000 Sales 8,037,374,000 8,218,180,000 8,153,495,000. Long Term Liab 1,579,745,000 1,361,678,000 1,537,980,000 Net Profit(Loss) 284,090,000 (56,933,000) 243,196,000. Fiscal Consolidated statement dated SEP 30 2013: Assets Liabilities Cash 600,677,000 Accts Pay 725,389,000 Accts Rec 2,342,262,000 Short-Term Debt 29,578,000 Prepaid Exps&Other Current 168,714,000 Taxes 6,127,000 Assets Deferred Tax Assets-Net 19,949,000 L.T. Liab-(1yr) 54,687,000 Accrued Exps&Other Current 915,282,000 Liabs Billings In Excess Of Costs 322,486,000 Curr Assets 3,131,602,000 Curr Liabs 2,053,549,000 Fixt&Equip 270,672,000 Long-Term Debt 1,089,060,000 Deferred Tax Assets-Net 143,478,000 L.T. Liab-Other 448,920,000 Investments-Other 80,045,000 COMMON STOCK 960,000 Goodwill 1,811,754,000 ADDIT. PD.-IN CAP 1,809,627,000 Intangible Assets-Net 83,149,000 ACCUM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (261,299,000) LOSS Other Assets 144,923,000 RETAINED EARNINGS 472,155,000 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS 52,651,000 Total Assets 5,665,623,000 Total 5,665,623,000 From OCT 01 2012 to SEP 30 2013 annual sales$8,153,495,000; cost of goods sold $7,703,507,000. Gross profit $449,988,000; operating expenses$72,999,000. Operating income$376,989,000; other income$3,522,000; other expenses$44,737,000; net income before taxes$335,774,000; Federal income tax$92,578,000. Net income $243,196,000. Statement obtained from Securities And Exchange Commission. Prepared from statement(s)by Accountant: Ernst& Young LLP, Los Angeles, California. ACCOUNTANT'S OPINION A review of the accountant's opinion indicated that the financial statement meets generally accepted accounting principles and the audit contains no qualifications. Explanations The net worth of this company includes intangibles. The report was updated using information the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. KEY BUSINESS RATIOS Statement date: SEP 30 2013 Based on this number of establishments: 46 https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 80 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?'ofessio^a Services AECOM • D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 11 of 13 Firm Industry Median Quartile Rank (Supplier) Return of Sales: 3.0 Return of Sales: 2.2 2 Current Ratio: 1.5 Current Ratio: 1.6 3 Quick Ratio: 14 Quick Ratio: 1.2 2 Assets/Sales: 69.5 Assets/Sales: 56.1 3 Total Liability/ Net Worth: 173.2 Total Liability/ Net Worth: 128.4 3 PUBLIC FILINGS The following Public Filing data is for information purposes only and is not the official record. Certified copies can only . be obtained from the official source. • LIENS A lienholder can file the same lien in more than one filing location.The appearance of multiple liens filed by the same lienholder against a debtor may be indicative of such an occurrence. Amount: $1,637 Status: • Open CASE NO.: 14-0462039 Type: County Tax Filed by: TAX COLLECTOR Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY(A CORP),GLEN ALLEN,VA Where filed: LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS, NORWALK,CA Date status attained: 05/05/2014 Date filed: 05/05/2014 Latest Info Received: 05/28/2014 Amount: $191 Status: Open CASE NO.: 130489722 • Type: County Tax Filed by: TAX COLLECTOR Against: • AECOM TECHNOLOGY,ONTARIO, CA Where filed: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,SAN BERNARDINO, CA Date status attained: 11/14/2013 Date filed: 11/14/2013 • Latest Info Received: • 12/16/2013 Amount: $79 Status: Open CASE NO.: 13-1577743 Type: County Tax Filed by: TAX COLLECTOR Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP, ENCINO,CA • Where filed: LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS, NORWALK,CA Date status attained: 11/06/2013 Date filed: 11/06/2013 Latest Info Received: 12/02/2013 Amount: $4,810 . Status: Open FILING NO.: 20130627000093 Type: State Tax Filed by: - STATE OF NEVADA Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,GLEN ALLEN,VA Where filed: CLARK COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, LAS VEGAS, NV https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH l Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 81 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Page 12 of 13 Date status attained: 06/27/2013 Date filed: 06/27/2013 Latest Info Received: 07/12/2013 Amount: $4,810 Status: Open CASE NO.: 4251677 Type: State Tax Filed by: STATE OF NEVADA Against: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.,GLEN ALLEN,VA • Where filed: WASHOE COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, RENO, NV Date status attained: 06/19/2013 Date filed: 06/19/2013 Latest Info Received: 07/26/2013 UCC FILINGS Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds Type: Original Sec.party: MACQUARIE EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC., BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2013 1278523 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: 04/03/2013 Latest Info Received: . 04/30/2013 Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds-Chattel paper and proceeds Type: Original Sec. party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION,SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2009 2654165 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE • Date filed: 08/18/2009 Latest Info Received: 09/21/2009 Type: Continuation Sec.party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION, SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2014 2965515 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: - 07/25/2014 • Latest Info Received: 09/23/2014 Original UCC filed date: 08/18/2009 Original filing no.: 2009 2654165 Collateral: Leased Inventory and proceeds-Chattel paper and proceeds Type: Original Sec.party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION,SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2008 2598769 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE Date filed: 07/29/2008 Latest Info Received: 08/27/2008 Type: Continuation Sec. party: CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL CORPORATION,SAN JOSE,CA Debtor: AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Filing number: 2013 2884618 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, DOVER, DE • https://www.supplierriskmanager.com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe... 10/16/2014 82 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM • - D& Supplier Qualifier Report: T B TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION., - Page 13,of 13 • Date filed - '07/25/2013 Latest Info Received: 09/24/2013 • Original UCC filed date: ., 07/29/2008 = Original filing no 2008 2598769 = � ' There are additional UCC s-n D&B s file on company available-b9 800=234-3867� - The public record items contained in'this report.may_have been paid, terminated, vacated or released prior to the date this report was printed. ' GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY Activity summary-., Borrower(Dir%Guar): NO Administrative debt: NO - - ' Contractor YES • Grantee: NO: :. Party excluded from federal program(s) NO , Congressional District: 40 _ The details provided in the Government Activity section are as reported to-Dun&Bradstreet by the federal government and other sources: Copyright 2014 Dun &Bradstreet-Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 263159923 </h • - https://www:supplierriskmanager:com/cp/getLiveReport?orgId=160548481&dunsNumbe::. 10/16/2014 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services, 83 • Aecom Technical Services;Inc. Last Updated 13=Oct-2014 Company Overview ., - ` • D-U-N-S Number ' •00-3,18-4462 Country'::. USA Primary Name: Aecom Teclinical Serrices,Inc. Phone: 213`593-8000 • Alternate Names: . AECOM" Web Site:.. - ' 'www.aecom com - CAGE codes 4L767: - Congressional District: 34 Address 515 S Flower St;Fl 4,Los Angeles,CA,90071;USA Location 'Headquarters Predictive Scores&Ratings 3 Supplier Overview SSI r Supply Base Alcmber, No:- SER ;. Supplier IDs Not Available Data Depth I Paydex ' :1 FSS Percentile \FCON1 TFCHNOLOCY CORPORATION Global Parent Performance Rating: ***�; Scorecard d.R isk Not Avail•ible .Last Update:10:13-2014 SIC Codes + „ .•87420400 Industry specialist consultants '8711-Engineering services ° 87489905. EmironmenI ii consultant • 4953-i-Refuse systems ,,;UNSPSC Codes 7020000;110-Use disposal and treatment NAICS Codes '' 562219-Other Nonhazardous Waste. Treatment and Disposal : CAGE Codes 4L767 Con iesssional District 34' • Supplier Diversity WOM No VET No • VVT Nu SBA No SDB N MIN Class No SSI And SER Paydex and Performance Rating, t•S51. eSFR,.� --i:..•PaYdex,*Performance Rating• , - I too -_ L-.L-._.. __—- 5 I . 4 fit, -- _ ~/ •- _ ; . o { - • o 130, Marl. J—r Kt n,+ • - a h4 n4 •seo e+ - 84 • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM Financial and Legal Indicators '- Government Indicators i Dis tster. j OFF Indicator._ Value Family. Company - J' LS Criminal proceedings OFF r CEP OFF 1 OFF (Family h itonnation is not available) • :: � ■EPA Formal Act ions(5yrs). - Financial/Legal • i OFF pFF!' OFF (Family Infornation is ot available). l Operations - ON `' • Alleged Current Violations. I — 5 EPA Pznalties(a y rsl,:. lr EPA Permity'Iast.Date Suits/.Judgements.,. ON -EPA Amt.ot.Last Penalty. ' :P.VOSHA OFF Liens/Claims • _ O� ON Out of business ,_ OFF Indicator ON berS%kith this .• L • TISHMAN REALTY& - CONSTRUCTION CO INC. - TISHMAN CNSTR SITE AT •' MARINA-This Family• r OFAC•' -_ { OFF OFF Financial Characteristics - Employer ID Nuiiiber(EIN):952661922 • Accounts Payable:NA - ,• Statement Date:NA • • Total Current Liabilities:NA - ' Annual Sales:50.00 ` Total Liabilities:NA .• Net Income N\, Current Ratio:NA Net Worth NA Quick Ratio:NA ti: Cash:.NA - '. . Total Employees:4805 I' = -. - Accounts Receivable,:.NA Sales/Employees:550.00 ., :, • TotaI Current Assets:NA Year Started:1970 St Inventory:NA - - ' -Management Control:2008 - - , Total Assets:NA , • Predictive Scores , • SSI - I *NIti - ,'l Commentary:` 10 5 0 I Higher than average risk of business failure within next 12 months. .. . @.-Operational special events such as business'move or.control change,and others can indicate supplier instability. Evidence of open suit(s)andlien(s); ,-Limited time under present management control. • _ AECOM. -. . -. . CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Arcnitectural and Engineering Services - 85 • SER Commentary: 9 5 1 -Variable Paydex over last 12 months -Limited time under present management control • -Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported • -Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry -Proportion of past due balances to total amount owing -Evidence of open liens,and judgments Paydex Description: 0 50 100 The D&B payment score(Paydex)is a score that assesses the historical payment performance of a business.The score corresponds to an average number of days beyond tents or within terms and is based on all the trade experiences associated with this business in D&B's database.More specifically.the Paydex is a dollar-weighted average of a company's combined individual payment experiences and ranges from 0-100.with higher scores representing businesses that pay their bills more promptly.In most cases.at least three trade experiences are required for the Paydex to be calculated. � FSS Percentile t ■■•=Nwm Commentary: 0 50 100 -Denotes a condition where fewer current payments by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where slower payments by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where public filings for the subject business have been provided to state regulatory bodies on a secured loan. -Denotes a condition where slower high payments(e.g.,in U.S.high US Dollar payments;in U.K.,high Great Britain Pound payments)by the subject business may indicate a lower probability of meeting future obligations. -Denotes a condition where the subject business may be seeking various lines of creditor applying to several institutions for a line of credit. FSS Class Commentary: i 5 3 1 The Financial Stress Score predicts the likelihood of a firm experiencing financial stress over the next 12 months.D&B defines a financially stressed company as one that obtains legal relief from its creditors,ceases business operations without paying all its creditors in full,voluntarily withdraws from business operations and leaves unpaid obligations.goes into recievership or reorganization,or makes an arrangement for the benifit of creditors over the next 12 month period.based on the information in D&B's commercial database CCS Class Description: 5 3 I The Commercial Credit Score(CCS)predicts the likelihood of a business paying its bills in a severely delinquent manner(91 days or more past terms). obtaining legal relief from its creditors or ceasing operations without paying all creditors in full over the next 12 months.D&B defines severe delinquency as a business with at least 10%of its payments 91 days or more past due,based on the information in D&B's commercial database.A Commercial Credit Risk Class of 1-5 is a segmentation of the scoreable universe into five distinct groups where a one(I)represents businesses that have the lowest probability of delinquency.and five(5)represents businesses with the highest probability of delinquency.This Class enables a customer to quickly segment their new and existing accounts into various risk segments to determine appropriate marketing or credit policies.Note:Commercial Credit Scores are not calculated • for those businesses designated as"Discontinued at This Location"."Open Bankruptcy",or"Higher Risk".These records are automatically assigned a score of zero(0). CCS Percentile Commentary: 0 50 100 The Commercial Credit Score Percentile is a 1-100 reanking where a percentile of 1 has highest probability of delinquency and a percentile of 100 has the II lowest probability of deliquency. D&B Rating Commentary: The D&B Rating helps you to quickly assess a company's size and composite credit appraisal.[t is based on information in the company's interim or fiscal balance sheet and an evaluation of its credit worthiness. Scorecard Risk Not Available Description: The risk class for this entity(supplier)is calculated in the primary scorecard.Possible values for the risk class are"Acceptable"."Moderate".or"Severe".For more scorecard detail for a supplier.click on the "Scorecard"tab at the left hand side of the supplier profile page. Viability Rating Not Available Performance Rating Global performance Internal performance * * * * * * *4 '• 4953-Refuse systems 4953-Refuse systems 86 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services AECOM • • . „ r • _ Category: .. . Internal:. Global _ c .? RELIABQ.,ITY o, . 78 Hole rcltahi do eou iliit&this compvn lollop thro'ngh on its _ '' comro+thi� ts COST ; - H..closet did sour final total costs correspond to 3 our rpeuntions u ''dOclR r aDn`E e.R ACCURACY ',`c l r ,Y, ' -- .„- f DELVERY/TIMELINESS i „• 'QUALITY - 0 74 -i - ' Hine satisied do coufeel abot lhe nalih_of the roduct/service ' -hrotului Vv lhu ctiiipauy^ _ •t BUSINESS RELATIONS 1 "- oHtHHhlo o ttce bt e i e cs gaapesucnlsl•cnfdidilinco o g y t toI ol f u ethI sw inu tl ur k fad 1ttenishhl lilic as,cbptnwioroolulnm'u:'pdctan' 'In S c rtelo ifidcdo sc:bh uof c •ncsspm mcldlalhuhcc'd G SC on t ce +:J I_ . 75 i 1,..:._:i.....,,,;PERSONNEL Hoec stutslicd do jrou feel about the attitude,courtesy,and pfoffsslonalism•of this conpattv's stil t„ . • CUSTOMER SUPPORT ', }' I-Io,,'satisfied do yo feel about the customer uiporl you reeci‘ed from i - thisonpan•! RESPONSIVENESS. 0 6�> Ho.responsit•c$o e`oli drip'k'ihis cons pany.ivas to information rgdosls.�r issues.ec'probl ms that iroscin the course of the Inmsaction' TowCorhpetitors. ' Data Not Available • • • ■ . ., • • • _ ' AECOM - CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I Professional Architectural and Engineering Services ? , - 87 • L - , ;`? 5 . i ., ''> , '- •', : icy' •r` _ - ., rte: - _ J i V • fit.. T' - - ,•y,. ' y - • -I• li5! 1. _. ty ; a• • 4 } _ „,\ '\;— ,_ _- -,:,27--.......• -4. ,,,,::-.-.41 0 . ,Ari.• \:' .; '...- - •\-- _ ..,_ .7 , *41, 4\libl:\'‘ ,,` ` `~lam 4.A . s -,,,,,,,4 ! :,..... .....,_._,. .,1'.:' ,.',. . _.;.z.; '; ..'''''.'.7..467000,..'.11:*..'-'•14‘41:41111%; •.+. 1 (1 i.i CC 4 R,:(..,...1",..":::,...':‘, -5'. .:,;b o f - ter' may^.' �\ , ! .;,, r� . -. \'I, .\.::;',2:'' .\)'.:1 t,. '.■ 4.:.., ..1..r.41,:r 1 - -s. . -..N., IL* Approach & _ ,,.. .r y ,. i , •, _ Methodology 1•, Lai ..1,r�� = , ,TI t f�' • ''■/,'',SA ',..' 4:1, ' .,ilk% bit'.. . ' , .'.:# , i (”:\ ' N .\\_..C. - i.!,'.,,,...4!",,,,.'",T,t1,;_ klii:-.' '-::s;11 i ' ' I it\ ' A ' ''•II. ' ,' '\ '. -1. /% 4,i A,..ti 1% ".i- --- '- ''.. .1,.„.,,, ,j. . \s,,.. ,.. --\ -:— ,-. ' , , . •_, 1 1;{ . . 4, \ � � �t'F,J wad,•.:' •t \♦ ` �� �• ..',, . ,.,,,,, .k. '', _ :`,. ..: ,, . :--,,k'4 '.eilig:-',.........t;..' . .' ..., I c. jai , t * 1. f • _` n• y., ' ,. A A' `"� _� c, t. ` J°.�� +7� �,' 7 VI`'♦ .tit' (\ yyLL, Ir A.,-,,..• i Mr y 1 .ter +r 1� 1 r alit I 9♦ fa.•'rh Y .:.a. -, V gym.`wVb ♦a • r•'' x i. T K • t .- p% it' ., ,:,.?::I .„.. 1 ii —,,,,,,....5._ r,.. :. j„, ., . • .1'443 din NMI ,, •' Aiiii ' ---'11P1 ' • ' iif, _ 21i, . ♦ �i CD t. _ r• CD I. • j M,aa. Y s .. �. 'A..,. ' - . " r • ry 3 Approach & Vethodology AECOM's Approach/Methodology AECOM's 5D Approach We have a proven approach to Streetscape, park and open space design and implementation, based on our 30+years of experience on public projects similar to projects that will be completed in Miami Beach. Known as we might call it-a"5D"approach,our approach assures a thoughtful,creative solution D E S I R E process that is"grounded"in community input and support throughout the process—right up to its implementation.The basic steps of our"5D"approach Client&User Needs can conveniently and memorably be summarized as:`Desire, Discovery, Design, Discussion,and Documentation.' Depending upon the scope of a project,AECOM will implement this methodology and/or tailor it to meet the challenge of specific projects. Desire During this first step of the process on any given project,we wilt conduct a Kickoff Meeting with City staff, Public Leadership Group(PLG) members and/or DISCOVERY other key stakeholders(as determined by the City)to establish expectations for the project.Typical review topics includes scope of work, project schedule,lines Research,Analysis, of communications, public involvement, review and approval process, project Comparabtes development program,construction budget, permitting,and bidding process and construction delivery method. We will also discuss community needs as they relate to the proposed `Development Program'of any proposed projects. Our team of park planners and designers will refine the programmatic needs into an implementable Phase 1 for further public input and evaluation. D E S I G N At this early stage we really need to hear what the City and client group desires to see in the eventual design—what needs to change,what needs to remain the Creation,Synthesis same,what needs further investigation.And while we are good listeners and take good notes,we will investigate and query to make sure that what we hear can be made into objectives for the project design process. Discovery During the Discovery step of a project—which may run concurrently with the Desire—the design team reviews site opportunities and constraints including any transportation/access issues,environmental conditions,drainage,utilities, D I S C U S S I O N easements, permitting and other issues that may affect the implementation of the project.A proposed task of the Discovery step may include visits to comparable projects in the region.The purpose of these site visits is to develop Interaction with Client, a common understanding of what stakeholders like and dislike about similar Evaluation,Reflection projects,which further helps us to understand the specific needs and desires of the City that may be illustrated through the design,construction,operation or maintenance of other successful public spaces.The product from the Discovery step will be an Opportunities and Constraints Memorandum,summarizing updated site opportunities and constraints to successfully constructing the site proposed programming. DOCUMENTATION Presentation&Summary AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 91 I _ 3. Approach & Methodology, Continued • • -{ r ter` , -� . � M • I AV, /11 ) o Public Engagment Workshop Plans from a Public Engagment Workshop Public Engagement is a key component of Discovery and "Documentation"which is the basis for the next phase of would include workshops and public engagement from a the process. public leadership group and general public through a multi- day workshop with a topic lecture series by the project's Documentation Advisory Team members. The final step of the planning and design process— before permitting, bidding and construction—is the Design Documentation phase. During this step of work we The Design step builds on the findings from the first two develop 30%Schematic Design Documents,60% Design phases,exploring various alternatives for accomplishing Development, Permit Documents and 100%Construction the Development Program on the site.We will begin by Document for the project, based on the final approved reviewing and discussing any conceptual plans or visions design.The documents include construction plans, developed in advance by the City in the light of our(joint) specifications and cost estimates,which will be submitted discovery effort,and out of those discoveries, in workshop and reviewed according to the project schedule.We have fashion offer alternatives on approach,design,and found it very helpful to assemble the entire design team for expression. From there,developing a consensus on design each of the review meetings to ensure good coordination; development on a continuing basis of consultation and during the Documentation phase of the recently exploration,we will be equipped to refine the concept plan constructed City of Kissimmee Waterfront Park,for into a solidly achievable and executable design. example,the City and design team met monthly to review plans,specifications, product samples,design details, Discussion cost estimates and permit submittals.Depending upon The purpose of the Discussion step is to build final the size and scope of a specific project,this phase can be consensus regarding a preferred direction/concept for abbreviated as necessary to accommodate needs of budget the project development.We will discuss and confirm and schedule. the City's preferred review and approval process at the Kickoff Meeting;our typical approval process includes the Services Rendered &Available Facilities review of alternative concepts and cost estimates with City staff, key stakeholders,general public,and City Council Our Coral Gables office will serve as our local point of as necessary depending upon the size and scope of the contact and will perform the majority of the work project. Effective meeting formats include workshops anticipated under this contract.This office provides and open houses. In developing the right manner in which landscape architecture planning and design services for to take the design ideas forward to the public,depending municipal clients throughout the South Florida area. on the specific project,we must be sensitive to issues of As a supporting role,our Orlando office will provide `design exhaustion'or other concerns having to do with the construction document production assistance and QA/QC length of time a project may have been under consideration services. We will also utilize our Raleigh, North Carolina prior to this phase of work,or the length of time since it has office for park planning services and AECOM specialists been seriously considered in the public forum. The final in Sarasota and Denver,Colorado for water use/irrigation plan and budget approved by the City Council will become needs. It is anticipated that over 90%of all work will be 92 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A-cnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM 3. Approach & Methodology, continued performed by AECOM directly,with the balance of the work and flowering trees and shrubbery in 35 acres of deep mart being accomplished by our Arborist sub-consultant. soils as well as 10 acres of containerized plant material. We are teaming with a local Arborist, Mick Gnaegy of Mix'd Their clients include: Florida Power&Light,US Homeland Greens,Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental,Inc.who will Security,US Air Force, US Customs&Immigration, Miami- provide arboricultural consulting services on an as-needed Dade Police Training Facility,US Coast Guard, Dade County basis, particularly as it relates to existing trees. Mr. Capital Improvements, BCA, Inc.,Girl Scouts of South Gnaegy will provide evaluations and appraisals that will Florida, Biscayne Point,Castello Hammock,Walmart Super be used as a basis for determining tree disposition during Center(Florida City), Boca Chita Island- Biscayne Nation the design process. Mr.Gnaegy's firm specializes in Park,City of Homestead and Adopt-A-Tree. governmental work and can consult on a wide variety of tree Their services include: Reclamation, Natural Areas related concerns. Management, Landscape Installation, Forestry Services, Land Clearing-Grubbing/Demolition Services, Exotic Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc. in an environmentally Vegetation Removal/Eradication/Remedial Maintenance, conscious full-service nursery dedicated to sustainable Vegetation Debris Removal&Clearing,Canal Cleaning solutions specializing in reclamation and restoration. They Services,Grounds Maintenance Services,Tree Services, are a proven leader in the industry for more than 35 years, Wholesale Native Plant Nursery,Aquatic Plant Services and veteran owned and operated by its founder, Mick Gnaegy. Biology and Hydrology Consulting. Mix'd Greens Environmental opened in 1977 as a start up design landscape installation company expanding into a Current and Near Future Workload wholesale nursery in 1989. The chart below indicates the approximate work load of They proudly service federal and local government each proposed team member as currently estimated. This municipalities and their agencies as well as provide AECOM work force is agile and well positioned to quickly quality plant materials to local and out-of-town landscape and effectively take on additional work to satisfy the needs contractors,architects, plant brokers/shippers and retail of Miami Beach. At any given time team members are firms throughout southern Florida and the Caribbean. available to assume new projects and work assignments Their nursery specializes in Florida and Caribbean Natives. can be shifted accordingly to provide optimum and timely They also maintain a large selection of exotic palms,shade service. TEAM MEMBER CURRENT WORKLOAD Greg Ault 75% Gustavo Santana,MLA 70% Lauren Swan,MLA 70% Michael Brown,RLA 75% Andrew Sheppard,RLA,LEED AP 70% Thomas J.McMacken,Jr.,RLA 75% Galen Pugh,RLA 60% Hannah Plate 75% Nicholas Kuhn,RLA 80% Drew Crumpton 75% Dale Morehouse,CID,CLIA 75% Jason Bird 70% AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professionai Arcnitectu,al and Engineering Services 93 J • 3. Approach & Methodology, cor`" Personnel Statement AECOM Office Printing/Scanning Hardware: Key personnel for AECOM will be available and assigned • Canon iR-ADV 8085/8095 to projects arising from this contract. Once we assign • Canon iR-ADV C5045/5051 a project team to an assignment,we commit the key . Canon iR-ADV C5250/5255 personnel to remain with the project until completion. In the unlikely case that key personnel are unable to complete • Canon iR-ADV C5030/5035 the assigned project,we will work closely with the City to • Canon imagePROGRAF Printer do what is necessary to smooth the transition between • Oce PlotWave 350 personnel and to maintain quality and consistency with the RICOH Printer Fiery •project schedule. • PS Driver for Universal Print Ability to Stay Within Budget The AECOM Team will utilize effective controls to provide AECOM NetworKi,ng. projects in a timely fashion within the budgets established • Windows 2003/2008 Server Network for projects that are assigned by the City of Miami Beach. • NETAPP SAN —20 TB Data Storage At the outset for each project,we will develop a detailed • Exchange Server 2010 Mail Server scope of services based on the needs of the City that clearly defines project deliverables and is tied to a budget that • Tape Backup Libraries is mutually agreed upon by the City and AECOM. Product • Multiple File Servers quality is of the utmost importance to the AECOM Team. • VPN Connection to home users AECOM will use its ISO 9001-certified Quality Management System to ensure quality projects are submitted according AECOM Visual Communication/Photo Imaging to the scopes and budgets established at the outset of each AECOM is a recognized leader in visual communication project. because we are constantly searching for better ways to illustrate what are sometimes difficult to understand Managing Time planning ideas and concepts. Utilizing a variety of 3D Based on the needs of the City of Miami Beach,AECOM illustration techniques,such as SketchUp,AECOM's will work with the City to determine a schedule that clearly first priority is to clearly communicate important issues, defines project deliverables,project milestones/due dates, opportunities and design solutions so that everyone and community workshops or other public meetings. involved can understand and take ownership in the project. Technological Capabilities In photo imaging,actual photos of local scenes are altered to illustrate the impact of design or planning initiatives. The alterations can be either locally recognizable features Typical Workstations&Laptops Include: • Dell Latitude E6400-E6420 Laptops,Optiplex 790-7010 up (for example, buildings)or can come from our library of scene components. Photo imaging is particularly effective to Precision T3500 Desktops in showing a sequence of actions and illustrating the • 4 GB/8 GB RAM or Higher cumulative effect of a combination of actions. • 17"to 22"Flat Panel Monitors • DVD+/- RW, 16X AECOM Transportation Engineering Software; AECOM transportation engineers are fluent with: Typical Software Packages Available: • Highway Capacity Software • Windows 7 Operating System • Microstation • MS Office 2010/2013 Suite • SOAP • Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign CS6 Design • Signal2000 Standard or higher • Transyt7F • Adobe Acrobat 11 Pro • TransCAD • Microstation v8i,XM,v8, • Cartegraph • AutoCAD 2008-2014 • SIGNview inventory database • ESRI ArcGIS 10— 10.2.2 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH P-ofessio gal Arcnitectu rat aid igSe-vices AECOM 3. Approach & Methodology, Cont,nuea • FSUTMS traffic forecasting software • SYNCHRO• Visual Basic •• • ', 1Pa an 11,4 Ptan for Duality 4 Simulation models are created and used to test existing and • proposed configurations for study corridors. • ■ Other Available Resources X Quality Assurance,Quality Control Act 4QuaEity . D0 During the entire design process we utilize,as mandated arkthe an-Build by our firm,a third-party quality control review process alit/In that starts with the earliest milestone products we create. • These efforts start at the`concept'level and proceed, • A rigorously(as a matter of course via the internal prompting • • of our online project management system)through the • • documentation phase we use our AECOM quality assurance/ • • • quality control process.Our Quality Assurance/Quality 4• .•• .-� •••••• Control benefits are maximized through a well-defined • process of communication involving all levels of the project -. team,along with a clear definition of project control and coordination activities.We utilize an in-house QA/QC "peer review"group to oversee the production of the final Quality is created by following a cycle that documents to assure their completeness and appropriate applies skills, knowledge, experience and level of detail.The peer review team will involve senior architects, landscape architects and engineers who are professional judgement to do things right experienced with the design and detailing of facilities and engage the client in all aspects of similar in scope and complexity.The peer review team will the project. The quality tools provided by check for accuracy,clarity,consistency, proper level of detail,compliance with all programming information and AECOM improve the likelihood of success. regulatory procedures and practices. Permitting, Bidding and Construction Administration AECOM has been a fixture in the south Florida region Architectural/Engineering industry for more than 80 years. For this reason,our firm has developed a solid working relationship with the various agencies with whom our team will need to coordinate with in order to ensure the timely delivery of any project regardless of scope or size. Our extensive knowledge of local conditions, permitting and approval procedures,and construction industry has allowed us to recognize and avoid the common pitfalls of this complicated process.Our hands-on experience with all of the tegulatory agencies who will be involved with projects located within the City of Miami Beach will be extremely beneficial to the City. Bid assistance will include conducting a pre-bid meeting with prospective contractors,answering bidders'questions,clarifying the final construction documents and project schedule,issuing required addenda, and evaluating submitted bids.Upon receipt of the bids, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services 95 3. Approach & Methodology, %. we will work with the City of Miami Beach to evaluate the Our clients can attest to the incredible service from best construction value and provide recommendations for AECOM's team.We work hard to earn your trust and to efficient contractor selection.Our construction observation do whatever it takes to meet your needs and schedule. services can ensure quality and efficient implementation Our goal is to not just'to get the job,'it's to develop a conforming to the final construction documents and long term,collaborative relationship with your team, environmental permits and agreements.These services will to work together to implement successful projects. In include conducting a preconstruction meeting;issuance of order to achieve this we typically include the following a conformed set of drawings including the incorporation of techniques to assure that the target schedule is met: addenda and permitting requirements;review of contractor submittals and Requests for Information(RFIs);review of To Maintain Schedule: shop drawings(as required)for any components related to • Detailed project schedule the proposed design and issuing Architect's Supplemental • Pre-scheduled milestones,interim submittal dates, Instructions(ASIs);review of contractor pay applications; review periods and presentations issuing field orders and change orders as necessary to • Monthly status meetings document changes in the contract documents;conducting preliminary and final punch lists and facilitating final • Interim reviews and meetings acceptance of phases of construction. • Monthly status reports tied to invoices Management Tools Summary Our team understands the role of communication in We have a sense of the City's operational and managing a project in a clear and effective manner. As management style on public realm projects,but we demonstrated during the successful completion of also recognize that every project is unique.Our outline many public beautification projects,AECOM works of process,above,is written primarily to reassure within a collaborative environment and key to that is you that we know how to execute complex projects, extensive communication and public participation.We are and that we have and will continue to examine all the experienced at connecting individuals to work as a group variables that can make or break a project's trajectory. and are committed to engaging the public with neutral and Most importantly, based on that experience,we know purposeful facilitation.Because of our deep and varied that we will be working in a collaborative manner with background in design and technical execution of projects, City expectations,needs and direction to develop an we are able to educate through informed facilitation.Our acceptable,creative and successful process. philosophy for communication activities and techniques include: • Be transparent and true to the role of facilitator • Be respectful and listen well to all participants • Create a safe,fun and energized environment • Design exercises to be interesting,entertaining and informative • Build on the findings and results of each previous exercise • Assure equal opportunity for participation • Stay on time,on task and on schedule • Take time outs if needed to address new issues or to re-focus the discussion • Regularly check in with the group to make sure that we are on task • Incorporate food and music whenever possible! 96 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A•cnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM 3, Approach & Methodology, CQ t ra Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Utilization AECOM will be engaging Mix'd Greens, Inc./Mix'd Greens Environmental, Inc.as a certified Miami-Dade County Small Business Enterprise. Department of ReguL Jry and Economic Resources MIAMPDADE Small Business Development 1 1 1 NW 1 Street,194"Floor COUNTY Miami,Florida 33128 Carlos A.Gimenez,Mayor T 305-375-3111 F 305-375-3160 CERT.NO: 15467 Approval Date:11/07/2013-MICRO/SBE November 7,2013 Expiration Date: 11/30/2016 Mr.Michael Gnaegy MIOD GREENS,INC. 28905 SW 162nd Ave Homestead,FL 33033-2200 Dear Mr.Gnaegy: Miami Dade County Small Business Development (SBD) under Business Affairs, a division of the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources(RER)has completed the review of your application and attachments submitted for certification. Your firm is officially certified as a Small Business Enterprise in accordance with section 2-8.1.1.1.1 of the Code of Miami Dade County. This certification is velid for three years provided that you submit a"Continuing Eligibility Affidavit"on or before your anniversary date of November 7,2014 and there are no changes in your firm pertinent to your certification eligibility. The submittal of a"Continuing Eligibility Affidavit"annually with specific supporting documents on or before your Anniversary Date is required to maintain the three year certification. You will be notified of this responsibility in advance of the Anniversary Date. Failure to comply with the said responsibilities may result in immediate action to decertify the firm. Pursuant to the applicable section of the code as listed above,"once your firm has been decertified.your firm shall not be eligible to re-apply for certification for twelve(12)months from the time of the decertification." If. at any time, there is a material change in the firm, including, but not limited to, ownership, officers, Director, scope of work being performed, daily operations, affiliations with other business or physical location of the firm, you must notify this office, in writing, within(30)days. Notification should include supporting documentation. You will receive timely instructions from this office as to how you should proceed,if necessary. Your company is certified in the categories as listed below affording you the opportunity to bid and participate on contracts with goals. Please note that the categories listed are very general and are used only to assist our customers in searching the directory for certified firms to meet contract goals. The directory for all certified firms can be accessed on the Miami Dade County RER website http://www.miamidade.govdbusiness/busines s-certification-pnOgrams.asp. Thank you for doing business with Miami Dade County. S' ere , She' cGrfff,Director Business Opportunity Support Services Small Business Development Division Regulatory and Economic Resources Department(RER) CATEGORIES:(Your firm may bid or participate on contracts only under these categories) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE:MOWING,EDGING.PLANT(NOT TREE)TRIMMING.ETC.(MICROISBE) LANDSCAPING(INCLUDING DESIGN.FERTILIZING,PLANTING,ETC.,BUT NOT GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OR TREE TRIMMING SERVICES)(MICRO/SBE) PEST CONTROL(OTHER THAN BUILDINGS)(INCLUDES SPRAYING OF TREES AND SHRUBS)(MICRO/SBE) TREE TRIMMING AND PRUNING SERVICES(MICRO/SBE) -- 1/ T.. WEED AND VEGETATION CONTROL(INCLUDING AQUATIC W gORiRQQ(IN! S t,teAce° C,. 't'YV Z)�U TREE AND SHRUB REMOVAL SERVICES(MICRO/SBE) ✓ DSDROOZO v2O1316.16 AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A-c'nitectural and Engineering Services Exceptions to RFQ Exceptions to RFQ AECOM Technical Services,Inc.submits its Proposal -1 6. : , - . o 6 --• • 6-- to the extent in response to the City of Miami Beach Professional caused by the negligent performance of the agreement by Architectural and Engineering Services project. In the the contractor or its employees,agents,servants,partners, event of award,we respectfully request the opportunity to principals or subcontractors.The contractor shall pay negotiate the final terms and conditions of any resultant all claims and losses•- -:- --- - -- -••• -,and shall contract. investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions ofa-ny-find ert-hatute in the name of the City,where applicable,including Exceptions to Request for Qualifications: ,and shall pay all costs,judgments, and reasonable attorney's fees which may be incurred SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS& thereon to the extent liability is ultimately apportioned GENERAL CONDITIONS to the Consultant.The contractor expressly understands 20.PAYMENT.Payment will be made by the City within and agrees that any insurance protection required by this thirty days of receipt of a properly submitted invoice for the Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in services completed in accordance with the requirements of no way limit the responsibility to indemnify,keep and save the contract. ; ... harmless and defend the City or its officers,employees, inspected,and found to comply with contract,specifications, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided.The above -- : 6; --: -- , ; -. . . .a :.Invoices indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or must be consistent with Purchase Order format. termination of this Agreement. 22.MANNER OF PERFORMANCE.Proposer agrees to APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner 4.Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less and in accordance with all applicable Local,State,County, than$1,000,000 with-the-deductible per claim,if any,not to and Federal laws,rules,regulations and codes.Lack of - --_ __ •__ knowledge or ignorance by the proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. 5.Excluding professional liability and workers Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided compensation,the City must be named as and additional by employees that are educated,and where required insured on the liability policies;and it must be stated on the by applicable laws trained,experienced,certified,and certificate. licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties.Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all Excluding professional liability,waiver of subrogation in documentation,certification,authorization,license,permit, favor of the City must be included for the policies required or registration currently required by applicable laws,rules, above.The insurance coverage required shall include those and regulations.Proposer further certifies that it and its classifications,as listed in standard liability insurance employees will keep all licenses,permits,registrations, manuals,which most nearly reflect the operations of the authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws vendor. or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract.Failure of proposer to comply with this paragraph APPENDIX F SAMPLE CONTRACT shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 1.5 CONSULTANT:The named entity on page 1 of this Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Agreement,the"Consultant"shall mean the architect/ Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform engineer who has entered into a contract with the City work or services as a result of any contract resulting from to provide the Services described under this Agreement. this solicitation,the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, - -_ _ "_ 4- =""" = • permits,and insurance,; -. ;--. - ; .; -:-- -- : -, -:- - -,; -: :-, : -- -- • required to comply with all applicable laws.The contractor = _ •"=" •=" = = = , shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned Consultant. In accordance with Section 558 ET SEQ of the to the extent caused by negligence of the proposer,or its Florida Statues and to the fullest extent permitted by law, officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to City acknowledges and agrees that no individual employee comply with applicable laws. or agent of consultant shall be held individually liable for damages resulting from negligence occurring within the 31.INDEMNIFICATION.The contractor shall indemnify and scope and course of this agreement. Any sub-consultants hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents retained by Consultant for the Project shall be subject to and instrumentalities from any-and-a-4 liability,losses or the prior written approval of the City Manager.Consultant damages,including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of shall provide the Project Coordinator with copies of the defense,which the City or its officers,employees,agents or contract between Consultant and any sub-consultant's.Any instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims,demands, such contracts shall contain provisions that preserve and suits,causes of actions or proceedings protect the rights of the City under this Agreement.Nothing AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitecturat and Engineering Se-vices 101 contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual ; -: ::: :•-: o. -.; - • •- relationship between the City and sub-consultants.Any a• -•:- : . -- "i• . approval of a sub-consultant by the City shall not,in any way, shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant, from the 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project,Consultant represents to City that it is knowledgeable of Consultant to City.Payment of sub-consultants shall Federal,State,and local laws codes,rules and regulations be the responsibility of the Consultant,and shall not be applicable in the jurisdiction(s)in which the Project is cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant located,including,without limitation,applicable Florida for payment of the Basic Services.The quality of services Statutes,and State of Florida codes,rules and regulations, and acceptability to the City of the services performed by and local(City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County) such sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of ordinances,codes,and rules and regulations(collectively, Consultant. "Applicable Laws").As they relate to the Services and to the Project,the Consultant agrees to comply with all The following sub-consultants are hereby approved by the such Applicable Laws in force at the time the Services are City Manager for the Project: performed,whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time,;-• - -; . -- ; - •- : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; : :• • •. - - • --a s : . • a- : If,after the date of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. this Agreement,there is any change in said laws,ordinances, 1.8 BASIC SERVICES:"Basic Services"shall include those codes,licenses,permits,agreements,rules or regulations services which Consultant shall perform in accordance which increase or decrease the services to be provided,or with the applicable standard of care and the terms of the cost or expenses incurred by the Consultant in performing Agreement(and as required to complete the Project),as the services under this Agreement,then the Consultant's further described in Article 2 and Schedule"A"hereto. compensation otherwise payable under this Agreement shall _ _ be increased or decreased accordingly by mutual agreement - ;••• - - --• - --- -- ---- -- • --- - between the Parties hereto." m' `� res Recognizing that the construction of other projects within 1.11 FORCE MAJEURE:"Force Majeure"shall mean any delay the City may affect scheduling of the construction for occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by the Project,the Consultant shall diligently reasonable violence in nature without the interference of human agency coordinate performance of the Services with the City such as hurricanes,tornadoes,floods,loss caused by fire (through the Project Coordinator)in order to provide for the and other similar unavoidable casualties;or by changes in - completion of Federal,State or local laws,ordinances,codes or regulations the Project pursuant to customary professional standard of enacted after the date of this Agreement;or other causes care and to the extent possible,without negatively impacting beyond the parties'control which have,or may be reasonably concurrent work by others.The Consultant shall coordinate expected to have,a material adverse effect on the Project, the Services with all of its sub-consultants,as well as other or on the rights and obligations of the parties under this consultants,including,without limitation,City provided Agreement and which,by the exercise of due diligence, consultants(if any). such parties shalt not have been able to avoid;provided, 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to City that however,that inclement weather(except as noted above), all of the Services required under this Agreement shall the acts or omissions of sub-consultants/sub-contractors, be performed in accordance with the standard of care market conditions,labor conditions,construction industry normally exercised in the design of comparable projects price trends,and similar matters which normally impact on in South Florida.Consultant represents to the construction process SHALL NOT be considered a Force the City that it is experienced,fully qualified,and properly Majeure. licensed(pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation Services.Consultant warrants a-rrel represents to City that under this Agreement due to a force majeure,the Consultant it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services shall request a time extension from the Project Coordinator (including,without limitation,the Design Documents within Five(5)business days of Consultant becoming aware contemplated in Schedule"A"hereto). that said force majeure will have an impact on the schedule. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES:Written Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not '' ' • ` " ` constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility - ` and liability of the Consultant(or of any of its offi-e-e-rs, em-p-oyees,sub-consultants,a ),for CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A cnitectural and Engineering Services AECOM the accuracy and competency of its/their designs,working coordination of all work required under the Agreement drawings,plans,technical specifications,or other technical (including the work performed by sub-consultants),within documents,nor shall such approval and/or decisions be the specified time period and specified cost.The Consultant deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by shall perform the work utilizing the skill,knowledge,and the City for trel-e-feet,error or omission in designs,working judgment ordinarily possessed and used by drawings,plans,technical specifications,or other technical -:--. •- ••• - :. documents;provided,however,that the Consultant shall be 6- : --. --- - -- ••: •- -- : - : : .6: members entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and validity of the Consultants's professional performing the same or of written decisions and approvals furnished by the City similar services under similar conditions in similar localities. pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant is responsible for,and shall represent to City that the work conforms to City's requirements,as 2.7 TIME: •-:- - :•• -: - : set forth in the Agreement.The Consultant shall be and , ,the parties remain liable to the City for all damages to the City to the agree as follows: extent caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the work.In addition 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as to all other rights and remedies,which the City may have, expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of the Consultant shall,at its expense,re-perform all or any professional skill and care required by this Agreement,and portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which to the orderly progress of the W-ar-k the Services. the extent result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards.T-h-e Consultant shall 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform with the approved Project Schedule,attached to as - Schedule"E"hereto.The Consultant may submit requests - - - - - for an adjustment to the Project Schedule,if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review - taken by the City(or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project)to approve the Consultant's '" submissions,or any other portion of the Services requiring liability required by applicable law.The Project Coordinator approval by the City(or other governmental authorities shall notify the Consultant,in writing,of any deficiencies having jurisdiction over the Project).Consultant shall and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. within 14 days of the delay provide the Project Neither the City's inspection,review,approval or acceptance Coordinator with written notice stating the reason for the of,nor payment for,any of the work required under the particular delay;the requested adjustment(i.e.extension)to Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant(or the Project Schedule;and a revised anticipated schedule of any sub-consultant)of its obligations and responsibilities completion.Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request under the Agreement,nor constitute a waiver of any of (and such other documentation as the Project Coordinator the City's rights under the Agreement,or of any cause of may require),the Project Coordinator may grant a reasonable action arising out of the performance of the Agreement.The extension of time for completion of the particular work Consultant and its sub-consultants shall be and remain involved,and authorize that the appropriate adjustment liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for be made to the Project Schedule.The Project Coordinator's all damages to City to the extent caused by any failure of --- - - - - - -- -- -- - ---- - approval(if granted)shall be in writing. - - - - - - - - - .-6 -6- •:-- : -- _ -- -- - .. the Consultant 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts endeavor to or any sub-consultants'willful misconduct,unlawful acts, maintain a constructive,professional,cooperative working negligent acts,errors or omissions in the performance of relationship with the Project Coordinator,Contractor,and the Agreement.With respect to the performance of work any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been by sub-consultants,the Consultant shall,in approving contracted,or otherwise retained,to perform work on the and accepting such work,ensure the professional quality, Project. completeness,and coordination of the sub-consultant's work. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement in a competent,timely and professional manner, 2.9.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure negligent ' -- ' --- '-` ' -' - • = • , act,error or omission in its performance,except to the extent construction services not conforming to the customary that acts or omissions by the City or other circumstances standard of care and any such services re-performed beyond Consultant's control make such performance within twelve(12)months following final acceptance and impossible. shall be subject to further re-performance,repair and replacement for twelve(12)months from the date of initial The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, re-performance,not to exceed twenty-four months(24)from technical accuracy,completeness,performance and final acceptance. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A'cnitectural and Engineering Services . : - :. : • - ' 2 : . 3.7 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct,by passage of • - -- "=• " "- " = an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: Section 2;5.2575,Florida Statutes,and Chapter 100 of - - ' • i a-,;- :: - --;• a- ;- • • _-- •-- - : 3.7.3 Upon written request from Consultant,the City Commission shall hear appeals from administrative decisions of the City Manager or the Project Coordinator.In such cases,the Commission's decision shall be final and 2.19 SUB-CONSULTANTS:All services provided by sub- binding upon all parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, consultants shall be consistent with those commitments nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the waiver of Consultant's right to seek recourse through a court competitive solicitation selection process and interview. of competent jurisdiction. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST and the sub-consultants,which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement.Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create --; "" a-- •- =- a- a -a; -a =• a--• • • any contractual relationship between the City and the sub- consultants. 4.3 Consultant shall represent to the City that its Consultant's review and evaluation of the Construction The Consultant shall not retain,add,or replace any Cost Budget,Statement of Probable Construction Cost,and sub-consultant without the prior written approval of any other cost estimates prepared(or otherwise provided) the City Manager,in response to a written request from by Consultant for the Project,represent Consultant's the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed best professional judgment as an experienced design substitution.Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City professional familiar with the construction industry; Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for provided,however,that Consultant cannot(and does the quality and acceptability by the City of the services not)guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other the City.The quality of services;-: :---_ ::' ' • a • • cost evaluation(s)prepared(or otherwise provided)by of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the Consultant. sole responsibility of Consultant.The Consultant shall cause the names of sub-consultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and • " - ` - •specifications. • -_ '` ` • • ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES ; • 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant all information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project.Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges to approve a-n increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, that,in making any such information available to Consultant, • -.-- :-:: the City makes no express or implied certification,warranty, -_ - . . . . .• - : -- - ':-, - -: - -' -- -- and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of :-: a• such information.T#e Consultant understands,and hereby the City. agrees and acknowledges,that it is obligated to verify to the • - Consistent with the professional standard ;"a a"" a a " " " "" a"" •" a" 6- :•6:- of care and unless otherwise specifically provided herein, = = Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of "" •" -• _ data and information provided by the City or others without =" -" """"" •" "" •" " independent review or evaluation. :" = =•"" CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?,ofessional Architectural and Enginee,ing Services AECOM .- -- -::-, -- :--• --: : :-• -i." -i ARTICLE 11.INSURANCE -• ; • -, - - ;-- •- •.- :_-•---- - ,; -; ; ;•• - - 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, •-: -- •--- - --; - •---- .• . -;_-- -; ;. Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance -- • ; :• ;. _ . • - • •,•- ; ;- ; ; •-: coverage in full force and effect.The Consultant shall not • _, �. •. commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required - insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Coordinator: ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES (a)Professional Liability Insurance,in the amount of one 7.6 No retainage shall be-made held from the Consultant's million dollars($1,000,000.00),per occurrence claim,with compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on a maximum deductible of$150,000 per occurrence claim, payments to Contractor. $450,000 aggregate.Consultant shall notify the Project Coordinator,in writing,within thirty(30)days of any claims ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS filed or made against its Professional Liability Insurance policy in the event such claims affect coverage related to the 9.3 At the City's option,the Consultant may be authorized, Project. as an Additional Service,to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; -:••-•- , a: ---- : -- 11.3 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance -• = _ -•- - ;_;_ ; -- 6- .. -_ _ ;- =-6•- company rated B+:VI or better,or its equivalent,according - - --• _ ;_;_ -- to Bests'Guide Rating Book,and by insurance companies • __ _ ; - _ ; duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida,and 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project Documents or any components thereof without permission 11.4 Consultant shall provide the Project Coordinator with from the Consultant or without any additional compensation a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. to the Consultant.The Consultant shall be released from any The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such liability resulting from such modification. policies,upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City,the 12.1 Pursuant to Section 725.08,Florida Statutes,the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the and its officers,employees,designated agents,and date of termination(as such date is set forth in,or can be instrumentalities,from liabilities,damages,losses,and calculated from,the City's initial written default notice). costs,including,but not limited to,reasonable attorneys' Upon payment of all amounts ; • ;--G.- • -- --: G- due fees,to the extent caused by the negligence,recklessness, to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2,the City or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and shall have no further liability to Consultant. other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE:In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause,the City through the -- ;--• -- --; :;. - - -"--- --: ;---- - - City Manager,may also terminate this Agreement,upon fourteen(14)days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause,and without penalty,when(in where applicable,including appellate proceedings,and shall its sole discretion)it deems such termination to be in the ••• ; _- ;: •; ; ; ; •-- best interest of the City.In the event the City terminates is-sue-there-am Consultant expressly understands and agrees the Agreement for convenience,Consultant shall be that any insurance protection required by this Agreement compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit accepted up to the termination date(as set forth in the City's its responsibility to indemnify,keep,and save harmless written notice),and for Consultant's costs in assembly and and defend the City or its officers,employees,designated delivery to the Project Coordinator of the Project documents agents,and instrumentalities as herein provided. (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above).Upon payment of all amounts due to Consultant 12.2 -- .--• - - _ --- :-- --a:.- -- -- pursuant this subsection 10.3,the City shall have no further - - -- -- - .. liability to Consultant. : - '- :- --.In reviewing, AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ?•ofessional A-cnitectural and Engineering Services approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, heretrn e Likewise,the City agrees that the Consultant's or other acts of the Consultant,the City in no way assumes total liability of any cause of action in connection with the or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant services provided under this Agreement.including,but not (including,without limitation its sub-consultants anti-/et-a-Fry- limited to claims for breach of contract,claims of negligence - - - - -- - ; -: • - - --- - • -6- and/or claims for indemnity,shall in no event exceed the . Neither party to this Agreement shall be not to exceed" amount received by Consultant under this liable to the other party or any third party claiming through Agreement. the other respective party,for any special,incidental, indirect,punitive,liquidated,delay or consequential 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: damages of any kind including but not limited to lost profits or use of property,facilities or resources,that may 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection result from this Agreement,or out of any goods or services 16.5.2,the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable furnished hereunder. Federal,State,and City procedures, from time to time in effect at the time the Project - . "e.e- : Documents are produced,by which the documents are handled,copied,and distributed which may include,but 13.1 ERRORS AND OMI'SIONS:It is specifically agreed that is not limited to,each employee of Consultant and sub- ; -. -:-- .- ': -- consultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate,or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager,in writing. 16.7 WARRAN-PF STANDARD OF CARE:The Consultant _ .: _. ; _: ;_ __ ; -;_ :-, ;; _ warrants represents that the Services furnished to the - ; City under this Agreement shall conform to the y- State of Florida reasonable care and skill in accordance and ::- . :• ::--;=-- : : consistent with the professional standards applicable to the design and construction of public and commercial facilities. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . 16.8 NON-EXCLUSIVITY:Notwithstanding any provision of this non-exclusive Agreement,the City is not precluded from -- • , ;a' ; ; -_.- - • ;•-- - : -- -_ retaining or utilizing any other architect,engineer,design • - ; --- :,-- -- professional or other consultant to perform any incidental -- --: ;- •-; -;-- .- - - Basic Services,Additional Services,or other professional - --•-; • - •- - -: . ; ;• services within the contract limits defined in the Agreement. The Consultant shall have no claim against the City as a - result of the City electing to retain or utilize such other • -- • • _ ._ architect,engineer,design professional,or other consultant -- :• -- ; ;_; -_ - __ : -_; ;; - ;. -- ;--•_•;- to perform any such incidental Services. Notwithstanding _ the forgoing,Consultant shall have no liability to the City for -- any work performed by any third party relating to a project under this Agreement. been e..ha. sted 16.9 ASSIGNMENT:The Consultant shall not assign, ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person,firm, association or corporation,in whole or in part,without the The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so prior written consent of the City Commission,which consent, doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause • •- - ; - , --; • of action for money damages due to an alleged breach discretion shall not be unreasonable withheld.However, by the City of this Agreement,so that its liability for any the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the such breach never exceeds the"not to exceed"amount Services to be performed by sub-consultants,subject to the of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement,less prior written approval of the City Manager. any amount(s)actually paid to Consultant hereunder. _- - •- ; - 16.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:The Consultant and _ : _ --;•- , -__ __ • . ; ;-, the City each binds himself/herself,his/her partners, _ _ • _ a ; _- - -;- ;_ a a- • _; successors,legal representatives and assigns and to . ; - «-; ; - ---;„ -- .-;- -•- ,_ ------ --- the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, -- • • it -- ;--, : - successors,legal representatives,and assigns of such party CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Professional A-cnitectural and Enginee-ing Services AECOM in respect to all covenants of this Agreement.The Consultant shall afford the City(through the City Commission)the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors : : -- --: -- -- ;.. •- • - :-: - .Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.12 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.12.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design services,and to include all necessary items for the}reps completion of such services in accordance with the standard of care : . . .-- •:-: ' -- --, -- • • : • - - - -- ----.T h e Consultant shall perform,as Basic Services,such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced,as necessary to complete the Project. AECOM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I ProfessionalA-chitecturaland Engineering Services 107 About AECOM With nearly 100,000 employees—including architects, engineers,designers,planners,scientists and management and construction services professionals—serving clients in more than 150 countries around the world following the acquisition of URS,AECOM is a premier,fully integrated infrastructure and support services firm.AECOM is ranked as the#1 engineering design firm by revenue in Engineering News-Record magazine's annual industry rankings.The company is a leader in all of the key markets that it serves,including transportation,facilities, environmental,energy,oil and gas,water,high-rise buildings and government.AECOM provides a blend of global reach,local knowledge,innovation and technical excellence in delivering solutions that create,enhance and sustain the world's built, natural and social environments.A Fortune 500 company, AECOM companies,including URS Corporation and Hunt Construction Group,had revenue of approximately$19.5 billion during the 12 months ended Sept.30,2014.More information on AECOM and its services can be found at www.aecom.com. Contact AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 800 Douglas Entrance North Tower,2nd Floor Coral Gables,FL 33134 T 305 444 4691 F 305 447 3580 www.aecom.com I 1