Loading...
2016-4020 Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 2016-4020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "BUSINESSES," BY ADDING ARTICLE XVII, ENTITLED "CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE," TO PROVIDE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A CITY- WIDE MINIMUM HOURLY WAGE; AND AMENDING CHAPTER 102 OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "TAXATION," BY AMENDING SECTION 102-371, ENTITLED "APPLICATION PROCEDURES[,]" BY ADDING A SUBSECTION ENTITLED "(J) COMPLIANCE WITH CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE" AND PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, promoting the welfare of those who work within the City of Miami Beach is one of the principle objectives of its municipal government; and WHEREAS, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, effective at that level since July 24, 2009 and, after years of inaction by the United States Congress, it is time for cities and states to lift families out of poverty and stimulate the economy by raising the minimum wage; and WHEREAS, a January 2015 poll by Hart Research Associates found that 75% of Americans (including 92% of Democrats, 73% of Independents, and 53% of Republicans) supported a federal minimum wage increase to $12.50 by 2020, which surpassed a February 2013 poll by the Pew Research Center finding that 71% of Americans supported a minimum wage increase; and WHEREAS, the Florida Constitution was amended in 2004, with the support of 71.25% of the popular vote, to establish a minimum wage in Florida higher than that required by federal law; and WHEREAS, that Amendment to the Florida Constitution explicitly stated as its public policy that "[a]II working Floridians are entitled to be paid a minimum wage that is sufficient to provide a decent and healthy life for them and their families, that protects their employers from unfair low-wage competition, and does not force them to rely on taxpayer-funded public services in order to avoid economic hardship"; and WHEREAS, that Amendment to the Florida Constitution explicitly stated that it "shall not be construed to preempt or otherwise limit the authority of the state legislature or any other public body to adopt or enforce any other law, regulation, requirement, policy or standard that provides for payment of higher or supplemental wages or benefits"; and WHEREAS, the poverty wage threshold for single adults providing only for themselves is $5.00 per hour(or$10,400 per annum assuming 2,080 hours worked per year); and WHEREAS, poverty thresholds do not account for living costs beyond a very basic food budget; the federal poverty measure does not take into consideration costs like child care and health care that not only draw from one's income, but also are determining factors in one's ability to work and to endure the potential hardships associated with balancing employment and 1 of 6 other aspects of everyday life; and, further, poverty thresholds do not account for geographic variation in the cost of essential household expenses; and WHEREAS, the newer "Living Wage" model, an alternative measure of basic needs to the poverty threshold, is a market-based approach that draws upon geographically specific expenditure data related to a family's likely minimum food, child care, health insurance, housing, transportation, and other basic necessities (e.g. clothing, personal care items, etc.) costs; and WHEREAS, the model draws on these cost elements and the rough effects of income and payroll taxes to determine the minimum employment earnings necessary to meet a family's basic needs while also maintaining self-sufficiency; and WHEREAS, the living wage in the State of Florida for single adults providing only for themselves is $10.94 per hour (or $22,755 per annum before taxes assuming 2,080 hours worked); and WHEREAS, the living wage in Miami-Dade County for single adults providing only for themselves is $11.45 per hour (or $23,816 per annum before taxes assuming 2,080 hours worked); and WHEREAS, the living wage for the cities of Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Florida for single adults providing only for themselves is $11.49 per hour(or $23,899 per annum before taxes assuming 2,080 hours worked); and WHEREAS, the minimum hourly wage in the State of Florida is $8.05, which is modified annually based upon inflation and a cost of living formula; and WHEREAS, the minimum hourly wage in the State of Florida was last increased on January 1, 2015, but was not increased on January 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach is a longstanding municipal leader in ensuring the utmost protection of the civil rights of its diverse and cosmopolitan population; and WHEREAS, other culturally and economically diverse destination cities and counties with large tourism industries — including San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and the District of Columbia — have seen it fit to significantly increase their own minimum wages to better serve their working class residents; and WHEREAS, the weight of research on previous minimum wage increases shows that raising the minimum wage has little or no adverse impact on employment and prices; to the contrary, according to the Economic Policy Institute, raising the minimum wage will help the economy at large, because workers' increased spending power will increase our nation's gross domestic product by about $33 billion and create approximately 140,000 jobs; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach is a vibrant multicultural community with significant tourism, service, and hospitality industries that must be founded upon the fair and equal treatment of the workforce; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Commission of the City of Miami Beach wish to ensure that each person working within the City limits is paid a minimum living hourly wage. 2 of 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENACTMENT That the Code of the City of Miami Beach be amended to add Sections 18-920, 18-921, 18-922, 18-923, and 18-924, and that section 102-371 be amended as follows: CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA CHAPTER 18— BUSINESSES ARTICLE XVII. CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE Sec. 18-920. Definitions. For purposes of this Section, the following definitions apply: The terms "Employer," "Employee," "Tipped Employee," and "Wage" shall have the meanings established under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), including its implementing regulations. "Fair Labor Standards Act" or"FLSA" means the United States Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. $ 201 et seq., in force on the effective date of this chapter and as thereafter amended. "State Minimum Wage Laws" means the Florida Minimum Wage Act, Fla. Stat. 448.01 et seq., in force on the effective date of this chapter and as thereafter amended, together with applicable provisions of the Florida Constitution, Fla. Const. art. X, & 24. Sec. 18-921. Minimum Hourly Living Wage. Every Employer subject to the business tax receipt requirements of Article V of Chapter 102 of this Code shall pay no less than the following Wages to each Employee for each hour of work performed for that Employer while physically present within the geographic boundaries of the City: (a) Beginning on ' •tc 20, 2017 alums/ 2018, the greater of: (1) the minimum hourly Wage set by the State Minimum Wage Laws; (2) the minimum hourly Wage set by Fair Labor Standards Act; or(3) $10.31 per hour. (b) Beginning on ,,January 1, 2019, the greater of: (1) the minimum hourly Wage set by the State Minimum Wage Laws; (2) the minimum hourly Wage set by the Fair Labor Standards Act; or(3) $11.31 per hour. (c) Beginning on4urve40.1.9 January 1. 2020, the qreater of: (1) the minimum hourly Wage set by the State Minimum Wage Laws, (2)the minimum hourly Wage set by the Fair Labor Standards Act; or(3) $12.31 per hour. (d) Beginning on4514449,342243ao January 1, 2021, the greater of: (1) the minimum hourly Wage set by the State Minimum Wage Laws, (2) the minimum hourly Wage set by the Fair Labor Standards Act; or (3) $13.31 per hour. 3 of 6 Indexing. Beginning on January 1. 2022, and every year thereafter, the minimum wage rate may, by resolution of the city commission, be indexed annually for inflation using the Miami PMSA Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent. The city commission may also, by resolution, elect not to index the minimum wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same (in a particular year). The determination to index (or not index) the living wage rate shall be considered annually during the city commission's review and approval of the city's annual operating budget. In the event that the city commission has determined, in any particular fiscal year(or years), to not index the living wage rate, and thereafter determines that making up all or any part of the prior year's (or years') unindexed percentage would not have an adverse fiscal impact upon the city, then the city commission shall also have the right, but not the obligation, to cumulatively index the living wage rate to "make-up" for any deficiencies in the prior year(or years)where there was (were) no increase(s) (the "catch up" election). The "catch-up" election must be approved by resolution. For Tipped Employees meeting eligibility requirements for the tip credit under the FLSA, Employers may credit towards satisfaction of the Minimum Wage in Subsections (a)—(e) tips up to the amount of the allowable FLSA tip credit. Sec. 18-922 Retaliation Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for an Employer or any other party to discriminate in any manner or take adverse action against any person in retaliation for exercising rights protected under this ordinance. Rights protected under this ordinance include, but are not limited to, the right to file a complaint or inform any person about any party's alleged noncompliance with this ordinance, and the right to inform any person of his or her potential rights under this ordinance and to assist him or her in asserting such rights. Sec. 18-923 Enforcement. Persons aggrieved by a violation of this ordinance may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against an Employer or person violating this ordinance and, upon prevailing, shall recover the full amount of any back wages unlawfully withheld plus the same amount as liquidated damages, and shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In addition, they shall be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation including, without limitation, reinstatement in employment and/or injunctive relief. Actions to enforce this ordinance shall be subject to a statute of limitations of two years or, in the case of willful violations, three years. Sec. 18-924. Construction. It is intended that case law. administrative interpretations. and other guiding standards developed under the federal FLSA shall guide the construction of this Ordinance or any implementing regulations. 4 of 6 Sec. 18-925.See Required Affidavit of Compliance. In order to apply for, renew, or receive a transferred business tax receipt pursuant to City Code Sec. 102, each business shall submit with their initial or renewal application an affidavit attesting to compliance by that business with the provisions promulgated under Section 18-921 of this Article. No business shall receive a business tax receipt unless the City receives such an affidavit. Sec. 18-926. 4h License Denial, Revocation, or Suspension for Certain Offenses. The City Manager, for good and sufficient cause, may deny an application for any permit or license issued under this Code if, during the 5-year period prior to the date of the application, the applicant has admitted guilt or liability or has been found guilty or liable in any judicial or administrative proceeding of committing or attempting to commit a willful violation, or two or more violations which do not include a willful violation, of the provisions promulgated under this Article or under the State Minimum Wage Laws or the federal Fair Labor Standards _ Act. CHAPTER 102 -TAXATION ARTICLE V- LOCAL BUSINESS TAX Sec. 102-371. - Application procedures. (i) Compliance with City Minimum Living Wage. No license shall be issued or granted to any person to engage in any business named, identified, or encompassed by this article unless that person or business' application includes an affidavit, legally binding upon the person or business, attesting to that person or business' compliance with the City Minimum Living Wage Ordinance, Chapter 18, Article XVII. SECTION 2. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter, Article, or Division of the Miami Beach City Code. 5 of 6 SECTION 4. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall be added to the Code of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If applicable, the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered to accomplish such intention, and the word `ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriated word. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect ten days after its passage and adoption, PASSED and ADOPTED this 8 day of ..)Inh2 , 2016. ATTEST: o B hq. Phili. - °' • ayor afael . Granado, Cit Clerk d. -'+, ( Co-S•onsore:F • .•*M. or Pt a vine Al : 'a or Micke Steinber. Corn issi.ner John =.�i �•uu� - oer R'ck rriola Commissioner Kristen Rosen Gonzalez Commisgion-r - ':n. Lommissioner Jo Malakoff.) * .INCCRP ORATED. j Underline denotes additio is. S 1. trike through denotes del' ;•: �i Double underline denotes a•• after,.first'F� g. denotes t losia#rjtir eading. . APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION \1 t 6 of 6 ( I City Attorney Date MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of the City Commission FROM: Raul J. Aguila, City Attorne 9� CC: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 6, 2016 SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "BUSINESSES[,]" BY ADDING ARTICLE XVII, ENTITLED "CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE[,]" TO PROVIDE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A CITY-WIDE MINIMUM HOURLY WAGE; AND AMENDING CHAPTER 102 OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "TAXATION[,]" BY AMENDING SECTION 102- 371, ENTITLED "APPLICATION PROCEDURES[,]" BY ADDING A SUBSECTION ENTITLED "(J) COMPLIANCE WITH CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE" AND PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Ordinance was approved by the City Commission at First Reading on May 11, 2016 and referred to the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee for public hearing, fact finding, and debate. At a specially set meeting on June 3, 2016, members of the Committee heard expert testimony, testimony from the public and City staff, and considered supporting documents entered into the legislative record. At the conclusion of that hearing, the members of the Committee made findings, unanimously approved the Ordinance, and returned it to the full commission for Second Reading. The transcript of that proceeding as well as written material entered into the legislative record are attached here. Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the Ordinance at Second Reading on June 8, 2016.1 Between First and Second Reading, the City Attorney's Office recommended minor changes to the Ordinance, which are incorporated into the proposed Ordinance for Second Reading. These include changes to a few words regarding construction of the Ordinance, and minor changes to the effective date 1 Agenda Item P S F Date 6-S-/(o SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE This Ordinance, raising the minimum living wage in the City of Miami Beach, has been proposed and sponsored by Mayor Philip Levine. The proposed legislation would gradually raise, over a period of four years, the minimum living wage for all workers employed in the City and covered by the federal minimum wage. The current minimum wage is currently $8.05 per hour, as mandated by the State of Florida's Minimum Wage Act. The Ordinance would raise this rate to $13.31 per hour by 2020, the rate currently mandated for employees of City contractors pursuant to the City's Living Wage Ordinance (as codified in Miami Beach City Code §2-408). The City's minimum living wage would be set at $10.31 per hour beginning in 2017, with one dollar an hour increases every year until the rate of $13.31 was reached on June 30, 2020. Thereafter, the City Commission could annually, at its discretion and by Resolution, consider whether an increase in an amount equal to the Consumer Price Index for the year should be required. Enforcement would be provided by private right of action to a court of competent jurisdiction and of the Ordinance administrative penalties by the City Manager. ANALYSIS The United States Congress enacted the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201 ("FLSA"), in 1938. Under the FLSA, the federal minimum wage was set at $0.25 an hour, and has since then increased steadily over time. Since 2009, the federal minimum wage has been $7.25.2 While the U.S. economy saw steady growth and an improvement in the jobless rate since 2009, wages have been flat or falling for much of the labor force. Currently across the country, there exists an ongoing campaign to raise the federal minimum wage above the current $7.25 level. A January 2015 poll by Hart Research Associates found that 75% of Americans (including 92% of Democrats, 73% of Independents, and 53% of Republicans) supported a federal minimum wage increase to $12.50 by 2020. Considering that a February 2013 poll by the Pew Research Center found that 71% of Americans supported a minimum wage increase, popularity is only surging for such changes. The federal and state government has not, however, acted. The U.S. Conference of Mayors' "Cities of Opportunity Task Force," in August 2014, endorsed higher city minimum of the Ordinance and dates for incremental increases in the minimum wage from June of each year to January of each year from 2018-2021. 2 Generally, the FLSA covers employers engaged in "interstate commerce" and have annual revenues of over$500,000. 2 wages as key tools for fighting income inequality at the local level. Over the past year, an unprecedented number of cities and counties have moved to adopt higher local minimum wages. In addition, cities are proposing substantially higher wage levels than the federal or state minimum wages (see Table 1). The Cost of Living in the City of Miami Beach A recent study based off the 50-30-20 budgeting rule (50% of income for necessities; 30% discretionary; 20% saved) calculated a cost-of-living comparison on a national scale across the 75 most populous U.S. cities, including Miami. In researching living expenses that include rent, groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare, they found the yearly salary needed to "live comfortably" in Miami to be about $77,000, the sixth most in the country. The results also showed Miami's median income of just under $31,000 is about $46,000 short of that number, representing "the biggest gap between actual and ideal incomes of any major city in this study."3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT") recently released research estimating the cost of living and hourly wage necessary to support a minimal lifestyle in Miami-Dade County. That study sets a minimum of $11.45 per hour in order for a single person to survive here in 2016. If family and children are added, the hourly wage necessary jumps to between $18 and $25 per hour. The Florida minimum wage is currently $8.05 per hour, $16,744 per year, if working 40 hours a week for 52 weeks (2,080 total hours). The graph below summarizes the MIT findings. The Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy at Florida International University recently theorized based upon available data that the cost of living in the City of Miami Beach is likely much higher. Miami-Dade County Annual and Hourly Cost of Living Estimates by Household _ Composition: 2016 (in 2014 dollars) Adults I—No Children T 1 Child 2 Children i 3 Children Annual Living : Annual ; Living Annual Living Annual Living Wage _ Wage Wage Wage 1 Adult i $23,822;$11.45 $50,114 : $24.09 ' $58,584 $28.17 $74,117 $35.631 2 Adults i $38,42 ' $18.47 $47,224 $22.70 ! $52,417 $25.20 i $59,388 $28.55 6 Source: Massachusetts Institute of Technology(MIT) Living Wage Calculator. 2016. Living Wage Calculation for Miami-Dade County, FL http://livingwage.mit.edu/counties/12086 3 http://miami.curbed.com/2016/4/20/11463074/miami-salary-live-comfortably 3 The Distinct Role of Local Minimum Wages Local minimum wages offer several distinct advantages that differentiate these policies from state or federal minimum wage laws: • They allow higher-cost cities to set minimum wage rates that better correspond to higher local living costs; • They allow localities in states where the legislature is slow to raise the minimum wage to address the problem on their own; • They provide venues for demonstrating the feasibility of substantially higher minimum wages, and pursuing key reforms such as annual inflation indexing and higher tipped- minimum wages, which are less commonly adopted at the state level. The Economic Evidence Shows that City Minimum Wages Boost Earnings Without Reducing Employment Economic evidence indicates that the higher city minimum wages enacted in U.S. cities to date have boosted earnings without slowing job growth or causing business relocations. These findings are consistent with the bulk of modern research on higher state minimum wages, which has generally found no statistically significant evidence of job losses resulting from minimum wage increases passed over the last 20 years in the United States. This is partly because the bulk of the low-wage positions affected by city minimum wages are in fields such as restaurants, retail, building services, home health care, and child care jobs that serve city-based customers such as residents, office workers, and tourists at city locations. As a result, most cannot practically be moved by their employers to locations outside of the city while still retaining their customer bases. Table 2 summarizes the most rigorous research examining the employment impact of minimum wage increases at the local level. The studies below pay particular attention to the experience of minimum wage increases in Santa Fe and San Francisco, which have had local minimum wages in place for over a decade now and offer the most complete picture of how businesses in low-wage sectors have adjusted to higher wage floors. In both San Jose and San Francisco, for example, jobs in the restaurant industry grew faster after the minimum wage was increased than they did in surrounding cities and counties that did not raise wages. In SeaTac, Washington—the first city in the United States to fully transition to a $15 minimum wage for workers in the hospitality and travel industries—predicted layoffs and expansion-plan cancellations did not materialize, and in fact some business owners, who were previously opposed to the wage increase, have expanded operations. And in Seattle, which began phasing-in its $15 minimum wage in April 2015, initial signs are positive. The 4 Seattle region's unemployment rate hit an eight-year low of 3.6 percent in August 2015, significantly lower that the state unemployment rate of 5.3 percent. And King County, where Seattle is located, is well on its way to breaking last year's record for the number of business permits issued to food service establishments. This is how the media has reported on city minimum wage increases in San Jose, SeaTac, and Seattle: "Interviews with San Jose workers, businesses, and industry officials show it has improved the lives of affected employees while imposing minimal costs on employers." – USA Today, `In San Jose, Higher Minimum Wage Pays Benefits" (June 14, 2014) "Fast-food hiring in the region accelerated once the higher wage was in place. By early this year, the pace of employment gains in the San Jose area beat the improvement in the entire state of California." - Wall Street Journal, "What Happened to Fast-Food Workers When San Jose Raised the Minimum Wage?Hold the Layoffs"(April 9, 2014) "Those who opposed the $15 wage in SeaTac and Seattle admit there has been no calamity so far." - Washington Post, "No Calamity Yet as SeaTac, WA, Adjusts to $15 Minimum Wage"(September 5, 2014) "For all the political uproar it caused, SeaTac's closely watched experiment with a $15 minimum wage has not created a large chain reaction of lost jobs and higher prices..." – Seattle Times, "$15 Wage Floor Slowly Takes Hold in SeaTac"(June 13, 2014) "When Seattle's pioneering $15 minimum wage law was the subject of fierce debate last year, Tom Douglas predicted it would inflict a $5 million hit on his empire of more than a dozen restaurants ... Yet six months after the first wage increase to $11 per hour took effect, the fear of soaring payrolls shows no signs of killing the appetite of Douglas — or the rest of the Seattle restaurant world — for rapid expansion. Dozens of new restaurants have opened in the city since April 1, including many new eateries run by the law's fiercest critics, such as Douglas." - – Puget Sound Business Journal, "Apocalypse Not: $15 and the Cuts that Never Came" (October 23, 2015) 5 FLORIDA INCOME REGULATIONS Prior to the establishment of the Florida Minimum Wage Act (see below), local municipalities in Florida enacted "Living Wage Ordinances." These laws set a local minimum wage for certain categories of employment at a rate higher than the one required under FLSA. Miami-Dade County unanimously passed its Living Wage Ordinance in 1999. The City of Miami Beach followed in 2001, becoming the first city in the State of Florida to have its own Living Wage Ordinance.4 It applies to City contractors. The City of Miami Beach's statutory living wage is currently set at $11.62 per hour for jobs with health benefits, and $13.31 for those without health benefits. Miami Beach City Code §2-408(a) In 2003, the Florida legislature passed, and Governor Jeb Bush signed, the "Minimum wage requirements by political subdivisions; restrictions" law, Fla. Stat. § 218.077. That Statute prohibited municipalities from adopting local ordinances establishing a local minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage, which was at that time ($5.15). Specifically, it read, in pertinent part: (2) ... a political subdivision may not establish, mandate, or otherwise require an employer to pay a minimum wage, other than a federal minimum wage, to apply a federal minimum wage to wages exempt from a federal minimum wage. The Statute did leave municipalities with the power to maintain Living Wage Ordinances, but only those that applied to city vendors and contractors. In immediate response, in 2004, 71.25% of Florida voters approved a Constitutional Amendment (now codified as Article X, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution), establishing a higher statewide minimum wage of$6.15 and indexed it to the Consumer Price Index. Florida's Amendment has a policy statement, which explicitly provides: (a) PUBLIC POLICY All working Floridians are entitled to be paid a minimum wage that is sufficient to provide a decent and healthy life for them and their families, that protects their employers from unfair low-wage competition, and does not force them to rely on taxpayer-funded public services in order to avoid economic hardship.5 The constitutional amendment specifically provides that municipalities may establish local minimum wages higher than those set by the state. Specifically, the amendment read: (f) . . . This amendment provides for payment of a minimum wage and shall not be construed to preempt or otherwise limit the authority of the state legislature or any other public body to adopt or enforce any other law, regulation, requirement, policy or standard that provides for payment of higher or supplemental wages or 4 Other counties in Florida with Living Wage Ordinances include: Broward County (October 8, 2002) and Palm Beach County(February 25, 2003); cities include Orlando(August 25, 2003). 5 Article X, Section 24, Fla. Constitution, subsection (a). 6 benefits, or that extends such protections to employers or employees not covered by this amendment.6 In 2013, the Florida state legislature passed, and Governor Rick Scott signed, an amendment to Fla. Stat. § 218.077, which ignores the constitutional amendment language and broadened the State's preemption of minimum wage law to include preemption of local regulation of benefits as well as wages. The statute currently reads: (2) ... a political subdivision may not establish, mandate, or otherwise require an employer to pay a minimum wage, other than a state or federal minimum wage, to apply a state or federal minimum wage to wages exempt from a state or federal minimum wage, or to provide employment benefits not otherwise required by state or federal law. It is our opinion that the 2004 Minimum Wage Constitutional Amendment reserved the authority of local governments to establish higher minimum wages than that set by federal or state law. Thus, Florida's statutory preemption of a local minimum wage, as set forth in both the 2003 and 2013 versions of Fla. Stat. §218.077, is unconstitutional because it violates that Amendment by taking power reserved to the municipalities and preempts it to the state. Therefore, we believe that an Ordinance by the Mayor and Commission of the City of Miami Beach, which sets a minimum wage higher than that set by the state or federal government, would be valid and would be upheld in court. FINANCIAL IMPACT In accordance with Charter section 5.02, which requires that the "City of Miami Beach shall consider the long-term economic impact (at least 5 years) of proposed legislative actions," this shall confirm that the City Administration evaluated the long-term economic impact (at least 5 years) of this proposed legislative action, and determined that there will be no measureable impact on the City's budget. CONCLUSION The proposed Ordinance comes at the right time. Miami Beach's cost of living is expensive and getting worse. Hotel room rates have risen to some of the highest in the country, leading to record profits. But wages have not reflected these realities. Cities around the country are setting fair wages for workers in their cities that allow employees to meet their basic human needs. Studies have shown that these higher living minimum wages have benefited everyone: employment rates remained steady, turnover was 6 Id. at subsection (f). 7 reduced, and employees were happier. The slow and gradual increase over four years in the wages paid to the City's lowest paid workers proposed here is prudent, fair, and lawful. RJA/rfr F:\ATTO\ROSR\RFR CMB\MINIMUM WAGE\COMMISSION MATERIALS\2016-06-06 MINIMUM WAGE MEMO (SECOND READING)(2).docx 8 Page 1 IN RE: FINANCE AND CITYWIDE PROJECTS COMMITTEE Miami Beach City Hall 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Friday, June 3, 2016 COMMITTEE MEETING ON CITY MINIMUM LIVING WAGE National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 2 1 APPEARANCES : 2 RICKY ARRIOLA, COMMISSIONER JOY MALAKOFF, COMMISSIONER 3 ELIZABETH ALEMAN, COMMISSIONER DONALD PAPY, CITY ATTORNEY 4 ALLISON WILLIAMS , CFO 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 3 1 Thereupon -- 2 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: We have a 3 really interesting topic today. This is a 4 topic of minimum wage here in our city, and 5 I know we have a lot of opinions on this 6 matter, and we' re going to have a really 7 interesting discussion today. There' s a 8 few things , housekeeping, that need to take 9 place. 10 This is a particular type of meeting 11 where we' re going to ask that folks that 12 coming up to speak get sworn in, and our 13 court reporter here will swear you in. 14 We' re going to hear, first, from some folks 15 from FIU, an economists, and a 16 representative from the National Employment 17 Law Practice come in, and then we'd love to 18 hear from members of the public on how they 19 feel about this topic of potentially 20 raising the minimum wage here in Miami 21 Beach. 22 I know we have folks from the 23 chamber of commerce, some union 24 representatives, members at large of the 25 public, so we want to try to get -- and the National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 4 1 1 hotel association, so we want to get as 2 many folks to speak as possible. 3 We ' re going to let the folks from 4 FIU as well as the National Employment Law 5 Practice speak on their expertise in this 6 matter to advise my fellow commissioners on 7 this, and then, obviously, we'd love to 8 hear from folks from the chamber, and the 9 hotel association, the union, and anybody 10 else who wants to speak on this matter. 11 Okay? We okay? 12 MR. ROSENWALD: Yes. 13 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: How do you 14 want to do the swearing in, one-by-one? 15 MR. ROSENWALD: We can do it just 16 everybody altogether. 17 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Everybody? 18 Okay. 19 MR. ROSENWALD: Everybody who 20 intends to speak today, please stand up, 21 and the court reporter will swear you in. 22 (Thereupon, the audience was sworn. ) 23 MR. ROSENWALD : If I can just give 24 some instructions . This is a legislative 25 fact-finding hearing, so you have been National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 5 1 sworn. When you come up, introduce 2 yourselves , say your name, spell it for the 3 court reporter. If he can' t hear you, 4 he may stop you and tell you to speak more 5 slowly or more clearly, and please do so 6 if he asks . 7 Also don' t -- while we expect 8 discussion, please don' t speak over each 9 other, because our court reporter is trying 10 to take everything down. So with that 11 I will first invite Laura Huizar who is a 12 staff attorney with the National Employment 13 Law Project to come up and give testimony 14 to the committee. Thank you. 15 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Good 16 afternoon. 17 MS . HUIZAR: Good afternoon. Thank 18 you. Can you hear me okay? Is that okay? 19 Perfect. Good. My name is Laura, 20 L-A-U-R-A, Huizar, H-U-I-Z-A-R, and I 'm a 21 staff attorney with the National Employment 22 Law Project or NELP. I actually grow up in 23 Florida, in Orlando, so it' s great to be 24 back here. 25 We' re a national nonprofit advocacy National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 6 1 organization. We' re based in New York City 2 but have offices around the country, and 3 I 'm based in our D.C. office. Our staff 4 are recognized as policy experts on a 5 number of employment policy issues , 6 including the minimum wage, and in 2004 7 NELP was the lead drafter of the 2004 8 constitutional amendment here in Florida 9 which created the first statewide minimum 10 wage. 11 Paul Song, who is my colleague, was 12 the lead drafter, and intended as part of 13 that constitutional amendment to give 14 cities like the City of Miami Beach the 15 right to enact local minimum wage that 16 exceeds the state minimum wage. 17 So the 2004 amendment was really a 18 response to the 2003 law that was passed in 19 the state which had tried to prohibit doing 20 that kind of -- or passing that kind of 21 legislation. So we' re very excited to be 22 here to support Mayor Philip Levine ' s 23 proposal to raise the City of Miami Beach' s 24 minimum wage to $13 . 31 by 2020 . 25 So I ' ll speak a little bit about the National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 7 1 national context for this type of 2 legislation, some of the things we' ve 3 learned from other cities that have so far 4 enacted similar proposals , and some of the 5 economic research that we' ve seen that 6 really backs up or supports this kind of 7 measure, and then I 'm happy to answer any 8 questions you might have. 9 So yes, we' re here in support of the 10 mayor' s proposal . As you probably know, 11 cities around the country have been passing 12 minimum wage legislation in growing numbers 13 in recent years . This has been really a 14 response to declining wages that we've seen 15 all over the country. 16 Just between 2009 and 2014 we saw 17 that the real median wage for workers 18 across the country declined by 4 percent, 19 and the declined was even steeper for 20 low-wage workers . So we've seen the value 21 of wages go down at the same time as income 22 inequality has increased and at the same 23 time that the federal government, the 24 federal minimum wage has stagnated at 7 .25 25 an hour. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 8 1 In 2003 only two cities, San 2 Francisco and Santa Fe, had a minimum wage 3 that was higher than the state. By 2013 -- 4 between 2013 and 2014 , that number had 5 increased to about 20 cities, and today 6 about 38 cities have enacted their own 7 higher minimum wage legislation. 8 And currently, you ' ll see that more 9 and more cities and states are moving 10 towards higher numbers than we' ve seen 11 before in terms of wage rates, and so we ' re 12 seeing more places go to 15 an hour. 13 California and New York just recently 14 adopted legislation that statewide will 15 establish $15 an hour as the minimum wage. 16 Cities that have done the same are 17 Los Angeles in California, San Francisco, 18 Seattle, and SeaTac, Washington. In 2014 19 Chicago adopted their own $13 minimum wage 20 legislation which is being phased in by 21 2019 . The state of Oregon recently passed 22 its own legislation which will increase the 23 state' s minimum wage to 12 . 50 , 13 . 50 , or 24 14 . 75 by 2020 depending on the region of 25 the state. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 9 1 Since November of 2012 when the 2 vast -- the "Fight For 15 Movement" 3 started, we've seen about -- about 17 4 million workers throughout the country earn 5 wage increases through state increases, 6 local increases , companies that are moving 7 their wages up, and executive orders at the 8 city, state, and other government levels . 9 We ' re also seeing about 10 million 10 workers seeing their wages go up to about 11 15 an hour through those types of recent 12 policy changes . And this is not surprising 13 to us given the type of support that we see 14 around the country for this type of 15 increase. 16 Recent polling data tells us that 17 approximately 2 out of 3 individuals 18 support $15 as the minimum wage, and 19 support amongst low-wage workers, meaning 20 workers earning at or below 15, is even 21 higher. We also know that low-wage workers 22 are more likely to vote for a candidate if 23 that candidate supports both 15 and a 24 union. 25 We' re seeing also, of course, that National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 10 l 1 low-wage workers -- I 'm sorry, that 2 low-wage workers support this type of 3 proposal at about 75 percent compared to 4 that two-thirds for workers in general . 5 And we know that increasing the minimum 6 wage here in Miami Beach would 7 significantly impact the lives of low-wage 8 workers here. 9 The city of Miami Beach has one of 10 the highest costs of living in the state of 11 Florida and also in the country. We know 12 that one single worker working full-time in 13 the city of Miami Beach would have to earn 14 about $15 an hour just to make ends meet, 15 and a working with one child working 16 full-time would need about $25 an hour to 17 make ends meet. 18 We also know that the most rigorous 19 modern economic research tells us that one 20 can increase the minimum wage without a 21 negligible -- or without an adverse effect 22 on employment levels . 23 The most sophisticated study that 24 we often cite to is one that was done in 25 2010 or published in 2010 , and looked at National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 11 1 250 pairs of neighboring counties across 2 the United States, and it looks like those 3 counties to see if a higher wage level in 4 one of those counties would have a negative 5 effect on employment in that county, and 6 this is considered one of the most 7 effective ways to isolate the impact of 8 raising the minimum wage. 9 In that study looking at those 250 10 pairs of counties found no significant 11 difference in employment level or in the 12 state' s competitiveness, meaning the state 13 with the higher minimum wage. 14 Another meta study looked at 64 15 other studies of the minimum wage, and it 16 similarly concluded that there was close to 17 no impact on employment for having the 18 higher minimum wage. 19 At the city level, we' ve also 20 started to see studies come out showing 21 that the same findings apply. In San 22 Francisco, for example, there was a study 23 in 2014 , it looked at basically the impact 24 of raising the cost of employment for 25 employers in San Francisco by about 80 National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 12 1 percent above the federal minimum wage, and 2 it concluded that there was no adverse 3 impact on employment, and it actually found 4 that looking at just food service jobs in 5 San Francisco, there was a 17 percent 6 increase in jobs in that sector compared to 7 the surrounding counties . 8 The same thing was found in Santa Fe 9 in a 2006 study that looked at the impact 10 of that minimum wage by comparing it to 11 Albuquerque, and it found that employment 12 levels in Santa Fe had not suffered 13 compared to Albuquerque' s, and that it was 14 actually doing better, employment was 15 actually doing better in Santa Fe. 16 The same thing was found in a study 17 looking at Washington D.C. , Santa Fe, and 18 San Francisco, comparing those cities to 19 their surrounding suburbs and other cities . 20 So the list goes on, and the written 21 testimony that I 've submitted today will go 22 into those studies in more detail, and 23 it will list other studies that may be 24 helpful to you. 25 But we' re also seeing, through the National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 13 1 experience of cities like Seattle, SeaTec, 2 and San Francisco, that you can increase 3 wage levels up to $15 an hour and still see 4 the same kind of findings . We' re seeing 5 very positive benefits in San Francisco and 6 Seattle, for example. The restaurant 7 industry in both of those cities are 8 booming. 9 To the extent that we have data, for 10 example, on the number of licenses issued 11 to food service and beverage businesses, in 12 Seattle we saw a 15 percent increase since 13 the $15 minimum wage started to go into 14 effect. 15 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Can you 16 repeat that. 17 MS . HUIZAR: In Seattle we looked at 18 the number of licenses that were issued to 19 food and beverage businesses from the start 20 of the implementation of that $15 wage, so 21 that was March 2014 to the present, and 22 we saw a 6 percent increase in the number 23 of those licenses issued. 24 A number of newspapers have reported 25 the same thing, the Seattle Times , the National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 14 1 Puget Sound Business Journal, the 2 Washington Post, all of these newspapers 3 and journalists have gone to those cities 4 and have confirmed that in fact the 5 restaurant industry is bombing and all of 6 the predictions that we heard from the 7 business industry about, you know, how this 8 was going to lead to a decline in business 9 and businesses were going to have to close 10 simply hasn' t come to pass . 11 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Would you 12 happen to know -- pardon the interruption. 13 Would you happen to know what the 14 unemployment rate has been since the 15 implementation of the new minimum wage? 16 MS . HUIZAR: My written testimony 17 has details on that for Seattle. We know 18 that after Seattle' s minimum wage 19 legislation went into effect, the 20 unemployment levels in Seattle were lowered 21 than in the state, and I don' t want to 22 maybe give the wrong numbers , but there was 23 a slight -- 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: A lower. 25 MS . HUIZAR: -- yeah, decrease in National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 15 1 Seattle. The Golden Gate Restaurant 2 Association in San Francisco, which is one 3 of the leading restaurant groups there, 4 recently issued a statement on their 5 website stating that the industry is 6 strong, tipping in restaurants continues to 7 be strong, and that the industry is doing 8 just fine with the kind of legislation that 9 has been successful in San Francisco. 10 And we also know, apart from these 11 studies, that the impact for low-wage 12 workers themselves and their families could 13 be truly significant. There' s studies, for 14 example, one from the National Institutes 15 of Health, which found that an increase of 16 $4 , 000 per year in income can lead to 17 approximately one extra year of education 18 by age 21 . 19 We also know from a study of 20 California that a minimum wage of $13 there 21 by 2017 can have significant benefits for 22 chronic diseases and disabilities, could 23 lead to less hunger, smoking, and obesity 24 in that state. 25 Now, of course, we' re happy -- we' re National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 16 1 happy to provide more research, more policy 2 analysis here in Miami Beach to support the 3 efforts of the mayor, and I ' d like to take 4 this opportunity, again, to thank you for 5 inviting me to testify, and I 'm happy to 6 answer any other questions . 7 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I have one 8 question. 9 MS . HUIZAR: Sure. 10 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Could you 11 please discuss in San Francisco or Seattle 12 the effect on the hospitality as far as the 13 hotel industry in those cities . 14 MS . HUIZAR: Correct, I don' t 15 know -- at this point I don' t have data on 16 the hospitality industry specifically. 17 I think some of our data will capture 18 restaurant servers who work within the 19 hospitality industry and outside of that, 20 and we 've seen, as I mentioned, that the 21 restaurant industry itself is doing very 22 well, and the articles -- all the articles 23 we' ve seen in San Francisco have reported 24 that all of the dire predictions simply 25 haven' t come to pass . National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 17 1 And I think one -- one good example 2 of -- or good evidence of the positive 3 impact in San Francisco is that the city 4 first enacted its first increase in 2003, 5 gradually increased, and in 2014 the $15 6 proposal was presented to voters, and that 7 was unanimously -- not you unanimously, I 'm 8 sorry, but with a great level of support 9 passed in San Francisco. 10 So the city has been experimenting 11 with higher wages for over a decade, and 12 legislators and residents have approved 13 even further increases . 14 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Thank you. 15 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: I have a 16 question. In any of that research, have 17 you seeing anything around the impact on 18 small businesses, perhaps an impact in the 19 number of operating licenses or requests 20 for new operating licenses by small 21 businesses so we can understand if there ' s 22 any, you know, more severe impact depending 23 upon the size? 24 MS . HUIZAR: Correct, that' s not 25 something we' ve seen. I think the Seattle National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 18 1 numbers that I cited for licenses for food 2 service and beverage businesses is a good 3 example. Those in Seattle, the numbers 4 were over 3,000 , so we know a lot of those 5 businesses are small businesses . We don' t 6 have over 3, 000 large chains operating in 7 Seattle, so that we think is good evidence 8 that it can benefit small business . 9 Recently the Washington Post leaked 10 a survey that was conducted by a council of 11 state chambers of commerce, and that survey 12 reported, based on their own members, that 13 80 percent of businesses supported 14 increasing the minimum wage, and only 8 15 percent opposed it. 16 And so what we' re seeing is that 17 even amongst business owners, members of 18 these chambers of commerce and the small 19 businesses that we talk to very often 20 support higher wages for their workers . 21 And in places like New York where more 22 significant and detailed studies have been 23 done, they have found that in some ways 24 there is an effective leveling the playing 25 field when you pass a higher minimum wage, National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 19 1 because a lot of small businesses are 2 already trying to pay higher wages, and a 3 lot of the larger retailers, chain 4 businesses are in some ways pushing wages 5 down. 6 So we've been trying to find more 7 data on that. It' s sometimes hard at the 8 local level, but we have seen that there is 9 kind of levelling of the playing field 10 effect with some of this legislation. 11 Yes . 12 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: Where was 13 the -- where was the chamber of commerce 14 study done? 15 MS . HUIZAR: So it was leaked to the 16 Washington Post. 17 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Okay. 18 MS . HUIZAR: It was done by a very 19 prominent pollster, I 'm not sure who it was 20 leaked by, but it was -- created quite the 21 stir. 22 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Thank you. 23 MS . HUIZAR: Uh-huh. 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What other 25 data do you have that you want to share National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 20 1 with us that you think is pertinent? And 2 I 've done a lot of research in the past 3 couple of weeks on this, and so I 4 definitely have a lot of questions, but 5 other data pro or con to this that you want 6 to share with us? 7 MS . HUIZAR: Sure, I think my written 8 testimony will have a lot more detail . 9 Seeing as hospitality might be a particular 10 concern here in Miami or Miami Beach, 11 we recently released a report in D.C. 12 looking at the effect of 15 in D.C. , 13 particularly on tipped workers in that 14 city, and we looked at some of the National 15 Restaurant Association' s own data, and 16 they, you know, project employment growth 17 levels and sales growth levels across the 18 country for each state, and what we found 19 there is that even in some of their 20 higher-wage states, so California, 21 Washington State, for example, both have 22 minimum wage rates around $10 right now, 23 those states have high employment growth 24 projections . 25 They also have sales projections National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 21 1 that are higher than the average for the 2 country. And so we ' re seeing that that 3 industry and by the industry' s own data, 4 it' s quite possible to be successful and to 5 have strong growth even with higher wages . 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Yeah, I mean, 7 I 've got all kinds of data on different 8 studies, and maybe I ' ll just wait to share 9 those, and I don' t know what the economist 10 is going to share, but some interesting 11 findings that were surprising to me. 12 MS . HUIZAR: Uh-huh, great. Any 13 other questions? No, okay. Well, thank 14 you so much for allowing me to testify. 15 MR. ROSENWALD: Commissioners , now 16 you' ll hear from Cynthia Hernandez , who was 17 until recently the lead researcher at FIU' s 18 RISEP Research wing, and she can explain 19 her role and her findings to you now. 20 MS . HUIZAR: Hi . Good afternoon. 21 I have a quick presentation I want to share 22 with folks, but let me just get it up here. 23 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: And could you 24 spell your name for the record. 25 MS . HERNANDEZ : Sure. It' s National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 22 1 C-Y-N-T-H-I-A, Hernandez , 2 H-E-R-N-A-N-D-E-Z . Hopefully, it should be 3 coming up. There you go . So my name is 4 Cynthia Hernandez . I was a researcher at 5 FIU at the Research Institute on Social and 6 Economic Policy for ten years until 7 recently moving to the South Florida 8 AFL-CIO where I 'm the head research there 9 as well. 10 So today I 'm here to talk about why 11 this initiative is important, not just for 12 Miami Beach residents, but also for 13 Miami-Dade County residents as well . So in 14 2006 -- or 2016 Miami was ranked No . 8 in 15 income inequality nationwide. A Brookings 16 report basically found that based on the 17 2014 census data, and it also showed that 18 Florida -- I 'm sorry, that the wealthiest 5 19 percent of people in Miami-Dade were making 20 basically 10 . 2 times more than the poorest 21 20 percent on average. 22 Sorry, I think my slides are a 23 little out of order here. 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. 25 MS . HERNANDEZ : Yeah, okay. So let National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 23 1 me go back to the beginning. So as Laura 2 stated, the minimum wage here in Florida 3 was passed in 2004 . It actually wasn' t 4 enacted until 2005 . The majority -- 5 overwhelming percentage of Florida 6 residence voted and approved for the wage 7 amendment to be passed, and it stated the 8 hourly wage at that time was only 16. 15 per 9 hour. 10 It also required a direct obligation 11 of $3 . 13 for tipped employees . Since 2005 12 or 11 years later, we' ve actually only seen 13 the raise -- the raise of the minimum wage 14 raised by $1 . 90 . So that' s less than $2 in 15 the 11 years that it has been enacted. 16 We can certainly, I think, all attest that 17 our cost of living has certainly increased 18 by more than $2 . 19 So this graph basically shows , and 20 I 'm not sure if it' s very clear on your 21 screen, but it basically shows the growing 22 inequality that not only exists here in 23 Miami-Dade County, but really throughout 24 Florida as a whole. 25 So if you see the darker green at National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 24 1 the top, it' s basically the U.S . mean 2 wages, followed by the Florida mean wages, 3 and the third line there is the U. S . median 4 wages compared to the Florida mean wages . 5 Basically, it shows that Florida' s wages 6 continue to be below average nationwide. 7 And what inequality, I would say, 8 that hurts minorities more than anyone 9 else. As you can see here on this graph, 10 just look at the left -- I 'm sorry, the top 11 two right columns here where it says 12 "white/black disparity. " If you look all 13 the way at the bottom, in 2014 there' s a 14 growing inequality between white and black 15 at $9,000 -- over $9,000 , where Hispanics 16 are over 6, 000 as well . So the people that 17 are hurt most are primarily minorities , 18 African-American and Latinos . 19 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Can you leave 20 that there. 21 MS . HERNANDEZ : Sure, and this is 22 based on census data. 23 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thanks . 24 MS . HERNANDEZ : All right. So this 25 is where I started. So a recent study by National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 25 1 GO Banking Rates conducted a cost of living 2 comparison of the 75 most populous cities 3 in the U. S . , surveying dollar amounts of 4 living expenses which included rent, 5 groceries, utilities, transportation, and 6 health care. 7 The study also compared the total of 8 income needed to be -- the actual median 9 household income in each city to see if the 10 differences in cost of living are matched 11 by differences in pay. The results are 12 clear, you know, showing that Miami ' s 13 median income of just under 31 , 000 is about 14 $46,000 short of that number representing 15 the biggest gap between the actual income 16 or the ideal income of any major city in 17 this study. 18 So for minimum wage workers, 19 that' s 16, 000 - you know, minimum wage 20 workers are only earning 16,744 . That' s 21 before taxes are even taken out, which 22 clearly falls short over $60 ,000 of that 23 ideal minimum wage. 24 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: May I ask you 25 a question about the 77 , 000 . Is that a National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 26 1 county average comfortable living, or is 2 that the peek, or is that Miami Beach? 3 What is that number? 4 MS . HERNANDEZ : That' s the Miami 5 metropolitan statistical area, so that' s 6 taking into consideration everything from, 7 you know, groceries , transportation, 8 healthcare. 9 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: Countywide. 10 MS . HERNANDEZ : County-wide, which 11 is one of the highest as well. 12 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: So conceivably 13 in Miami Beach it could be more. 14 MS . HERNANDEZ : It could be even 15 higher, correct. So this table here shows 16 the annual cost of living estimates by 17 household comparison. So for an adult 18 without children, the annual cost is 19 23, 820 . For an adult with a child it' s 20 50, 000 . So this is just the median wages . 21 So in Miami Beach we can see that 22 22 percent is -- this is higher than the 23 Florida wage -- I 'm sorry, the Florida 24 average. It' s actually 24 percent higher 25 than the national average, and the cost National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 27 1 alone in Miami Beach is 65 percent higher 2 than the national average. That' s a huge 3 significant difference. 4 So it' s fair to say that not all of 5 Miami employees currently live in Miami 6 Beach, and that' s why I think this 7 initiative is going to have ripple effects 8 all over our county. So when we look at 9 the cost of living for Miami-Dade County, 10 the monthly rent alone is for a 900 square 11 foot apartment is just a little less than 12 $1 , 500 . For a 480 square foot studio, it' s 13 just a little over $1 , 000 . 14 Again, you know, I put this number 15 of 16, 744 , because this is the annual 16 average salary that a current minimum-wage 17 worker earns before taxes . So if we take 18 that into consideration, that' s means that 19 75 percent of a minimum-wage worker has to 20 pay 75 percent of that in housing costs 21 alone if they live in Miami-Dade. That' s 22 why we see many minimum-wage workers that 23 are having to work two or three jobs at 24 most. 25 So a Brookings report in 2016 found National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 28 1 that Miami ' s metropolitan statistical area 2 ranked No. 8 in income inequality 3 nationwide. The wealthiest 5 percent of 4 people are making 10 .2 times more than the 5 poorest, 20 percent on average. The gap is 6 even wider in the South Florida area where 7 the richest sector earns 15 times more than 8 the most impoverished. 9 And I put this -- you know, I 'm 10 putting these statistics up, because it' s 11 important to note that the majority of our 12 growing businesses here in South Florida 13 and growing jobs are minimum wage jobs . 14 This creates a larger income inequality 15 across, you know, not just the state but 16 certainly within our Miami-Dade County and 17 Miami Beach area. 18 So what does this mean globally? 19 Globally, it means that Miami ' s income 20 inequality is higher than that of Buenos 21 Aires, Argentina, and Rio De Janeiro in 22 Brazil, and it mirrors Mexico City. So 23 we' ve not just become a gateway to Latin 24 America, we have become Latin America. 25 According to a Bloomberg analysis, National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 29 1 Miami is the toughest city for low-wage 2 workers to increase upward social mobility. 3 So what is "social mobility"? It' s 4 basically, it allows workers to move up the 5 ladder. 6 Historically, rates for women in 7 Florida have been higher than those of men 8 than the overall poverty rate for the 9 entire population, and I ' ll say that 10 between 1980 and 2014 median annual wage 11 inequality grew from 6,552 to just under 12 10 , 000 , which is a gap increase of 42 13 percent between white and African-American 14 workers . During the same time, the 15 white/Hispanic median annual wage disparity 16 grew by 43 percent, so almost double. 17 Minorities experience higher levels 18 of poverty when compared to the white 19 population. African-Americans experience 20 the highest poverty rates, which have been 21 above 20 percent historically. The 22 Hispanic Latino population experienced 23 lower levels of poverty, nevertheless, 24 still in the double digits , and this is all 25 data coming from the State of Working National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 30 1 Florida Report, which is produced annually 2 by The Research Institute. 3 So on average the four largest 4 paying industries -- lowest paying 5 industries in Florida were retail trade, 6 agricultural, forestry, fishing, and 7 hunting, leisure and hospitality and food 8 services . These industries offer many 9 opportunities to enter or reenter the labor 10 market and have possibilities for career 11 advancement at the management level . 12 In 2014 there were 3 .2 million or 22 13 percent of the labor force working in these 14 industries in Florida. It' s important to 15 note that these industries comprise a 16 significant percentage of Florida' s growing 17 economy, I should add, and yet historically 18 these are the lowest paying industries in 19 Florida and pay below $30 , 000 a year. 20 The largest growing sector of jobs 21 in Florida are within the hospitality and 22 tourism, which are compromised primarily 23 here in Miami Beach. Yet the Florida 24 general sales tax is 18 percent higher than 25 the national average. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 31 1 Florida State income tax is , 2 we know, one hundred percent lower than the 3 national average, and the Florida Retail 4 Federation year after year boost on their 5 earnings year after year, yet they continue 6 to fight us -- fight wage theft -- 7 anti-wage theft ordinances or fight against 8 increasing the minimum wage. 9 So in closing, you know, minimum 10 wage, what we've seen, and, you know, to 11 reiterate some of Laura' s points, job 12 losses for raising minimum wage are 13 negligible. Minimum wage has already been 14 raised 23 times with no detriment to the 15 economy. 16 A 2014 survey found that more than 3 17 out of 5 small business owners support 18 increasing the minimum wage to 10 . 10 an 19 hour. The real value of the minimum wage 20 has fallen dramatically, and since the 21 minimum wage was last raised 2009 22 nationally, the price of apples went up 16 23 percent, bacon 67 percent, cheese 21 24 percent, coffee 27 percent, beef 39 25 percent, and milk 21 percent. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 32 1 Low minimum wage laws are government 2 subsidies to low-wage businesses, period. 3 Worker productivity has gotten much faster 4 than wages using the 1968 minimum wage as a 5 benchmark. If minimum wage grew at the 6 same rate as worker productivity, it would 7 have reached 21 . 72 per hour. Raising the 8 minimum wage to $10 would impact over 15 9 million workers , 4 , 700 ,000 working mother' s 10 would get a raise. 11 There' s widespread bipartisan 12 support for raising the minimum wage. In a 13 2015 poll, 75 percent Americans including 14 53 percent of republicans support raising 15 the minimum wage to 12 . 50 by 2020 . And 16 last but not least it would certainly 17 increase consumer purchasing pour for those 18 low-wage workers who are not able to save, 19 and, therefore, their money gets circulated 20 back into the economy and also reduces 21 employee turn over. So in conclusion -- 22 sure. 23 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: Before you 24 leave that site, the first bullet, how are 25 you measuring worker productivity there. National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 33 1 MS . HERNANDEZ : So it' s basically 2 looking at what corporations have made, the 3 earnings , GDP, and looking at -- comparing 4 it to wages . 5 So in conclusion, a minimum wage 6 earner, again, earns only 16, 744 a year 7 working 40 hours a week, 52 weeks of the 8 year, not including taxes . So that' s 9 16, 744 . We try to think about how we would 10 ever make ends meet living in Miami on that 11 salary, and it' s impossible. 12 So if raised to 13 . 13 per hour, then 13 the annual salary would increase to 27 , 684 , 14 and that basically -- my last point here is 15 that even raising it to 13 . 31 by 2020 is 16 not enough. Our workers deserve better, 17 our residents deserve better, and our 18 economy will grow when our earners earn 19 what they make. Thank you. 20 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: How do -- do 21 you know how we index the step-ups that are 22 contemplated in this resolution from the 10 23 to the 13? 24 MS . HERNANDEZ : I 'm sorry? 25 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: The step-ups, National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 34 1 is that indexed for particular inflation? 2 I just want to make sure we get the record 3 straight of how these numbers were 4 established. 5 MR. ROSENWALD: Hi . Rob Rosenwald, 6 city attorney' s office. When the mayor 7 proposed this ordinance, the way he arrived 8 at the numbers were to match the number at 9 the end of the ramp-up period in 2020 to 10 our current living wage ordinance price 11 that we pay to our contractors and 12 employees, and so we got to 13 . 31 by 2020 , 13 and then simply incremented by a dollar an 14 hour starting in 2018 in order to reach the 15 13 . 31 by 2020 . 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: All right. 17 So we' re more or less trying to level the 18 playing field of what the city is paying as 19 a living wage and what we' re requiring our 20 vendors who do business with the city to 21 even the playing field with any other 22 employer in town. 23 MR. ROSENWALD: That' s correct, and 24 we put a lot of thought and a lot of study 25 into what the living wage should be at the National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 35 1 time when we adopted it and when we index 2 it, and so it' s not a number that' s 3 arbitrarily chosen, and you' re right, 4 leveling the playing field after we've seen 5 how well our living wage ordinance worked 6 was really the goal . 7 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: I 'm not sure 8 if you' re prepared to expand on the comment 9 that was in your slide, that low-wage 10 minimum wages is a subsidy to business . 11 Can you expand on that? 12 MS . HERNANDEZ : Sure. So when 13 we have business owners that are not paying 14 a fair living wage, whether that' s some of 15 them are paying below the minimum wage, 16 which we see a lot all over this county, 17 because we don' t have a state Department of 18 the Labor to enforce our labor laws . So 19 when we see these companies or employers 20 paying less than a living wage, I should 21 say, basically, we see that most of those 22 folks -- you know, for example, minimum 23 wage earning just slightly above $17 , 000 an 24 hour, they are more likely to need 25 government assistance, and, therefore, National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 36 1 corporations or business entities, 2 employers who are not paying a minimum wage 3 are perpetuating this dependency on 4 government assistance. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Yeah, that' s 6 one of the things that dawned on me when 7 I was reading the research, which is, you 8 know, to some extent businesses that pay 9 minimum wage or low wages, they in essence 10 get a free ride or are getting the benefit 11 of a government subsidy that they don' t 12 have to absorb in their own cost structure. 13 Because whether it' s food stamp or 14 other public subsidies to help provide for 15 folks who aren' t living -- or making a 16 living wage, that' s a cost that isn' t borne 17 directly by that small business, the rest 18 of society absorbs it, but that business 19 isn' t necessarily paying that. 20 MS . HERNANDEZ : Correct, and even 21 through our own research, we have found 22 that business owners encouraging their 23 employees to apply for government 24 subsidies . 25 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Do you have National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 37 1 statistics on what the effect of raising 2 the minimum wage will have on poverty? 3 MS . HERNANDEZ : Locally or across 4 the country? 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Nationally. 6 MS . HERNANDEZ : Nationally there are 7 plenty of statistics, and I 'm sure Laura 8 probably -- 9 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: I mean, 10 I have it if you don' t, but I 'd like to 11 have someone else -- 12 MS . HERNANDEZ : Yes, so there are 13 statistics that show that nationally. 14 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: From what I 15 read in multiple studies , a ten percent 16 increase in the minimum wage reduces 17 poverty by one percent. One percent is 18 2 .2 million Americans . 19 MS . HERNANDEZ : Significant. 20 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I have a 21 question. I have one question. You talked 22 about the disparity effecting primarily 23 African-American and Hispanic workers . Do 24 you also have a breakout of women workers? 25 MS . HERNANDEZ : I do, yes . National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 38 1 Unfortunately, I did not include it in this 2 presentation, but I ' d be more than happy to 3 share with you how it significantly effects 4 women workers . 5 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I figured 6 it did. 7 MS . HERNANDEZ : And single mothers , 8 I should add, as well. 9 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Yes . Do you 10 know the percent? 11 MS . HERNANDEZ : I actually don' t 12 have the percent. I have it here, I can 13 look it up and get back to you. 14 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Okay. Okay. 15 Later, yeah. 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: If you look 17 it up, you can come back. 18 MS . HERNANDEZ : Sure, I 'm more than 19 happy to do that. 20 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What' s 21 interesting about that is there ' s a 22 disproportionate effect on African-American 23 and Hispanics and women on low minimum 24 wages, but raising the minimum wage 25 actually has a disproportionate benefit National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 39 1 percentwise, because there' s more white 2 workers , so more of the benefit percentwise 3 goes to white workers . 4 That' s just an interesting 5 statistic. It will help a lot of people, 6 though. 7 MS . HERNANDEZ : Sure, and I think 8 it really depend on the industry, right? 9 So depending on what industry. 10 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: And the 11 location. 12 MS . HERNANDEZ : That' s correct. 13 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: A question 14 about do you have any numbers -- I 'm 15 thinking about the 77 , 000 and single 16 working parents . Do you have any numbers 17 on the cost of daycare, childcare for a 18 working parent that has to put their child 19 into some sort of daycare or other sort of 20 care facility during the day while they 21 work or at night whenever they' re working 22 and what those costs are compared to the 23 wages that they' re earning? 24 MS . HERNANDEZ : That' s actually a 25 really great question. I actually don' t National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 40 1 have the exact figures, but I do know that 2 Miami-Dade County recently released a 3 report showing how there ' s a growing cost 4 to childcare, and how disproportionately, 5 you know, women and single-parent 6 households cannot afford to basically make 7 ends meet simply because of the childcare, 8 and I believe that there are some childcare 9 workers here, so maybe they can better 10 answer that specific question. 11 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Do you have 12 any data on the effect of the increase of 13 the minimum wage on businesses or other 14 organizations? In particular what I ' ve 15 seen is in cases where minimum wage was 16 increased, not really much noticeable 17 effect -- negative effect on businesses, 18 and part of that is because that extra 19 money that' s being created gets spent on 20 those local businesses . 21 MS . HERNANDEZ : That' s correct. 22 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Do you have 23 any data to help expand on that? 24 MS . HERNANDEZ : I do have data, and 25 I 'm happy to share it. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 41 1 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. You 2 can come back. 3 MS . HERNANDEZ : You know, what I 've 4 said is it reduces employee turnover rates 5 which reduces labor costs . 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You know, one 7 of the things about minimum wage is, as you 8 said, it forces people to work two or three 9 jobs , so to the extent that they can get a 10 living wage and maybe spend more time with 11 families , which is a net positive, and 12 maybe not have to take the second and third 13 job, increases opportunities for folks that 14 are unemployed. 15 MS . HERNANDEZ : Absolutely. 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Any data on 17 that? 18 MS . HERNANDEZ : That I don' t 19 believe -- not off the top of my files , but 20 I 'm sure we can look for that and share 21 it with Rob. Thank you. 22 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Rob, do 23 we have anybody else? 24 MR. ROSENWALD : That' s the end of 25 our expert testimony. I know there are National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 42 1 several groups here who would like to 2 speak, so I 'd just turn it over to you to 3 conduct the testimony in the order you 4 prefer. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. Great. 6 I think we ' ll keep it, I mean, unless you 7 have objections , the way we typically do 8 it, sort of someone who is in favor of 9 raising the minimum wage and folks who have 10 a different opinion, we' ll kind of go 11 one-by-one. You know, you can each kind of 12 step to -- you know, one side will say this 13 is for maybe not going forward with the 14 minimum wage increase and folks that want 15 to support the minimum wage increase, and 16 we' ll give each other three minutes and 17 if we have more time at the end, we ' ll use 18 it. 19 Frank, you' re welcome to go first. 20 You rased your hand. Frank, are you in 21 favor? 22 MR. DELVECCIO: In favor. 23 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay? 24 MR. DELVECCIO: Frank Delveccio, 301 25 Ocean Drive, a retired attorney. National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 43 1 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Pardon me, 2 Frank. Could someone keep time. Let' s do 3 this for three minute. 4 MR. DELVECCIO: I 'm going to need 5 less . 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: The reason 7 is, folks, the president is visiting Miami 8 Beach, which is wonderful . Traffic is 9 going to get busy around four, and I want 10 to try to get us out of here before then, 11 so keep that in mind. 12 MR. DELVECCIO: Good public policy, 13 a good direction. You ' re authorized to do 14 this under the state constitution and good 15 legal analysis . Let me just make a couple 16 of recommendations . 17 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Keep talking. 18 Is somebody keeping the time? 19 MR. DELVECCIO: No, I ' ll stop 20 talking. It' s too distracting when you 21 keep -- 22 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You can have 23 as much time as you need, I just want to 24 make sure someone ' s keeping track. Go 25 ahead, Frank. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 44 1 MR. DELVECCIO: Okay. I suggest, 2 too, what I think should be clarifications 3 and improvements to the text of the 4 ordinance you should have before you. The 5 real teeth of this ordinance is that an 6 entity, a business, corporation that is 7 doing business or an individual that is 8 doing business in the City of Miami Beach 9 can be denied a business tax receipt by the 10 City and must provide an affidavit, perhaps 11 in the application, that he or she or the 12 entity will comply with the City' s minimum 13 living wage ordinance. That' s the teeth of 14 it. 15 So I think as currently written, and 16 I passed out a little suggested language, 17 but as currently written, I ' ll read briefly 18 from the text of 18 -- Section 18 . 921 . 19 "Every employer shall pay no less than the 20 following wages to each employee entitled 21 to receive the federal minimum wage for 22 each hour of work performed for that 23 employer while physically present within 24 the geographic boundaries of the city. " 25 This could mean that a UPS driver or National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 45 , 1 a driver of some vehicle in interstate 2 commerce could be held -- the company could 3 be held accountable for the duration of the 4 time that employer is delivering or passing 5 through the city. So I don' t think you 6 want that. 7 I think you want it to read that 8 every employer who is subject to the 9 business tax receipt requirement of 10 Article 5 of Chapter 2 Miami Beach City 11 Code shall comply with all these 12 requirements . 13 And the second point is you've got a 14 couple of sections that deal with 15 enforceability, and this is the teeth of 16 your ordinance, Section 18 . 925 and Section 17 102 . 371 (i) . Currently, it' s worded in the 18 passive voice that there should be 19 compliance with. I think you should 20 substitute that the application for a 21 business tax receipt should include an 22 obligation to comply. And that' s basically 23 it. The applicant for a city business tax 24 receipt shall certify on the application 25 form that the applicant will comply with National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 46 1 the City' s minimum living wage ordinance. 2 I think that was the intention. 3 You' ve got a lot of legal loose ends if you 4 don' t change that language, because you 5 purport to give a civil right of action to 6 an agreed person or employee recourse to 7 the court which would apply to a UPS driver 8 passing through and making a few 9 deliveries . So I think limited to the 10 City' s -- compliance with the City' s 11 business tax receipt, that is the trigger 12 that brings the business within the 13 parameter of this very good ordinance. 14 Thank you. 15 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you, 16 Frank, and thanks for doing the analysis 17 for us . I don' t know, were you going to 18 comment? I ' ll ask that very question that 19 Frank asked towards the end of our city 20 attorney' s , who I know are considering this 21 very issue. 22 Next? 23 MS . KALLERGIS : Good evening. Wendy 24 Kallergis, W-E-N-D-Y, K-A-L-L-E-R-G-I-S, 25 president and CEO of The Greater Miami National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 47 1 Beaches Hotel Association. 2 First of all, I would like to open 3 by telling you that we ' re not opposing an 4 increase, what we' re challenged with is the 5 speed of the timeline. So I wanted to read 6 to you our statement that we made at the 7 commission meeting. 8 The GMBHA supports policies and 9 regulations that ensure is a fair and 10 equitable working environment for both 11 employees and employers . Wage increases 12 proposed at the federal, state, or local 13 level must not be too high or fast for the 14 industry to absorb. 15 The GMBHA views increases that are 16 too high or fast as hurting the hotel 17 industry and its ability to create jobs and 18 grow the economy. Increases that are too 19 high and fast negatively effect the jobs of 20 the people that they are purported to help. 21 Our governmental affairs consultant, 22 AI Advisory Group, prepared a survey for 23 Miami Beach hotels since our last 24 commission meeting, and we wanted to 25 provide to you an overview of the results National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 48 1 of the survey. We received responses from 2 43 hotels on Miami Beach comprising of 3 boutique hotels , chain hotels, luxury, and 4 limited service. 5 By an almost 3 to 1 margin, Miami 6 Beach hotels expect the proposed wage 7 increase to have a negative effect on the 8 hospitality industry. Approximately 9 two-thirds of our hotels will be disrupted 10 because the proposed minimum wage increases 11 are too large and too high to absorb. 12 A significant percentage feel new 13 wage levels, $10 . 31 and $13 . 31 are going to 14 have serious consequences . Our hotels 15 reported that they will be forced to reduce 16 employee head count, benefits , and hours . 17 As numerous challenges face our 18 Miami Beach hospitality industry and while 19 the market is still very, very strong, with 20 the Miami Beach Convention Center 21 renovation and illegal short-term rentals, 22 it is very important that we continue our 23 great work together in welcoming 24 opportunity, to also work very closely with 25 you and staff to define wage increases in a National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 49 1 timeline that industry can absorb without 2 inadvertent consequences and serious 3 disruptions . Thank you very much. 4 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I wanted to 5 speak to you specifically about the illegal 6 short-term rentals, and Commissioner Aleman 7 and I are both working on something which 8 will help the hospitality industry with 9 that. 10 MS . KALLERGIS : We appreciate that, 11 and we ' re actually working very well with 12 staff right now, so we have -- I think 13 working together we ' re going to make a big 14 difference. 15 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Yes . Thank 16 you. 17 MS . KALLERGIS : Thank you. 18 MS . WALSH: Good afternoon, 19 commissioners . My name is Wendi Walsh, 20 W-E-D-N-D-I, W-A-L-S-H, and I am proud to 21 be the principal officer for Unite Here, 22 Local 355 . We are the hotel workers union 23 here in South Florida. Our union 24 represents 1, 400 hotel workers here on 25 Miami Beach, many of whom are here with us National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 50 1 today, and hundreds of thousands of 2 hospitality workers across the United 3 States and Canada. 4 As we talk about the data, I would 5 like to put a face on this issue for us 6 here this afternoon. Our members and the 7 city' s hotel workers are mostly women, 8 mostly recent immigrants, and nearly all 9 people of color. They are housekeepers and 10 dish washers who do some of the toughest 11 behind-the-scenes work to make some of our 12 hotels here so some of the best in the 13 country. 14 In Miami the average cost to rent a 15 hotel room is $246 . For the time period 16 January through March of this year, that 17 was the highest room rate in the entire 18 country, higher than San Francisco, Maui, 19 and New York City. Yet when you talk about 20 what the housekeepers make to clean these 21 hotel rooms, Miami is very far behind. 22 Hotel housekeepers in Miami on 23 average clean between 20 and 30 rooms a 24 day, and earn around $9 an hour; while in 25 New York City, housekeepers clean nearly National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 51 1 half that, 15 rooms, and earn nearly $30 an 2 hour; and in San Francisco they' re also 3 cleaning 15 rooms a day and earn closer to 4 $20 an hour. 5 A real living wage here in Miami 6 Beach is extremely necessary. The hotel 7 workers are the backbone of the tourism 8 industry. Many of our members who work 9 here have had to move off the beach to make 10 ends meet, while others struggle to 11 continue living here on the beach. They do 12 their best, as was said earlier, working 13 two, sometimes three jobs, but it just 14 isn' t enough. 15 As the Miami Beach hotel industry 16 makes record profits, it' s only right to 17 direct our attention to the people who make 18 that possible. You cannot continue to have 19 a successful hotel industry with poor, 20 frustrated, anxious hotel workers . The 21 workers cannot be expected to smile for a 22 guest when they' re worried about feeding 23 their kids . 24 We applaud the commissioners for 25 proposing to expand the living wage to all National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 52 1 of the workers here on the Beach, and the 2 members of Unite Here will stand and 3 support every step of the way. Thank you. 4 MR. TARTARINI : Hello. My name is 5 Eduardo Tartarini, T-A-R-T-A-R-I-N-I . I 've 6 been living in Miami Beach for 25 years, 7 and I work in the hotel business for 20 8 years . I can see increasing of living is 9 enormous . All of my friends have to leave 10 the beach. 11 I want to also know that the 12 building where I live, the rent is 450 a 13 month 25 years ago, and now the rest costs 14 $1, 800 , and a lot of people, they have to 15 move, a lot of good workers, people like me 16 that pay taxes, provide many things for the 17 hotel business . 18 Miami Beach is one of the highest 19 tourisms in the world, and I met people 20 even from Dubai that like to come to Miami 21 Beach, and I think that this living wage is 22 necessary, not only for me, but for people 23 who are my neighbors, so they can have a 24 good standard of living. 25 I have a niece who is a single National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 53 1 mother, and she can hardly pay the 2 baby-sitter, and she can hardly pay also 3 her rent, and they have to move somewhere 4 else, and they cannot be closer to me as 5 part of my family. Thank you. 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Michael . 7 MR. GOLDBERG: Thank you, 8 commissioners . Michael Goldberg, 9 M-I-C-H-A-E-L, G-O-L-D-B-E-R-G, chairman of 10 the board of the Miami Beach Chamber of 11 Commerce. 12 Just for the record, you know, 13 we are here to get more information, which 14 I think a lot of great information was 15 presented today, and we want to thank you 16 for that. We have not taken a formal 17 position on it for or against. I just want 18 to point out a few concerns that did come 19 up. We had a few meetings, and I just 20 wanted to point out a couple of them. 21 Similar to the hotel association, 22 one of our concerns is the -- and the 23 outreach that we did was the time frame. 24 If this does pass by 2020 , the wage would 25 have to be up to $13 . 31 . Based on an $8 . 05 National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 54 1 wage now, that' s a 65 percent increase in 2 about a three-year time period. So that 3 was one of the concerns that came out from 4 some of the outreach that we did. 5 Also there may be some unintended 6 consequences, you know, if this does pass . 7 This is feedback that we 've gotten back, 8 not the Chamber' s position, you know, of 9 one small business owner to say, well, I 've 10 had someone working for me for ten years , 11 I ' ve gotten them up to a certain wage, 12 which be above the $13 . 31 , but then if you 13 hire someone else, you pay them the same, 14 that employee may say, well, I ' ve worked 15 here ten years, and now this person is 16 coming on board, and he' s going to be 17 working at the same wage. So they felt 18 that may be a concern. Again, this is just 19 feedback that we' ve gotten that I wanted to 20 share. 21 And the last one, which, I think, 22 was expressed by Jerry Libbin, our CEO, was 23 any possible litigation that we may have to 24 go into with the State and the cost of that 25 litigation. I just wanted to share that, National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 55 1 but we appreciate you having this special 2 meeting. There ' s some great information 3 that we will now take back, you know, to 4 our board and to our members , and 5 we appreciate you doing this special 6 meeting to give us more information on 7 this . Thank you. 8 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thanks , 9 Michael, for coming in. Folks, let' s have 10 some decorum. Okay? I have questions for 11 you, you know, particularly small business , 12 I think the average small business owner 13 makes $30 , 000 a year. It' s not what people 14 typically think. Mom and pops work as hard 15 as anybody or harder than many people just 16 to make ends meet themselves . 17 So I have a concern on anything that 18 impacts our small businesses, which is the 19 backbone of our economy, whether it' s 20 rising health care cost, rents, government 21 red tape, or wages . 22 Any comments or thoughts that you 23 have on what this would mean to small 24 businesses , and how we can make sure that, 25 you know, we don' t put people out of National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 56 1 business , because if we put people out of 2 business , you lose jobs . 3 MR. GOLDBERG: Sure. Well, it' s 4 funny you say that, because one of the 5 things that came up and was discussed was, 6 of course, this threshold to be $500 , 000 in 7 gross sales . Over 500 ,000 you'd have to be 8 implemented, if it was less than 500, 000 , 9 they wouldn' t have to implement it, so the 10 question came up, you know, well, would 11 that impact them. 12 Well , it actually would impact them, 13 too, because if you've got employees and 14 you' re a small business owner with gross 15 sales of less than 500 ,000 , and you' re not 16 paying that wage, whether or not it was the 17 10 . 31 which would be implemented, you know, 18 a year from June or at the end of the year, 19 they would have a problem retaining their 20 employees, and that actually came up in 21 some of their discussions, that it really 22 is going to effect all small business . 23 Again, I don' t think there' s an 24 issue with raising the wages . I mean, 25 again, there' s some good facts that were National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 57 1 presented here, and we definitely want to 2 bring that back and I think educating the 3 small business owners and all the business 4 owners in the City of Miami Beach as to, 5 you know, what the statistics are. It' s 6 important. 7 We really have been trying to 8 gatherer data and just learn as much as 9 we can, and we didn' t think we had enough 10 data to take a formal position yet, but 11 we appreciate you taking the time to 12 educate, you know, the public on the issue 13 for the next commission meeting. 14 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You know, 15 there' s so much goes into -- I 'm a business 16 owner myself. There' s so much that goes 17 into a business and, you know, costs and 18 being able to make a profit is essential 19 for a healthy business, and wages are a 20 huge component for many businesses, but, 21 you know, I 'm interested in maybe the 22 chamber can help us identify ways to help 23 particularly the small businesses but also 24 our workers , because even if minimum wage 25 were to go up, it' s not a silver bullet, National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 58 1 people are still going to struggle to make 2 ends meet. 3 This will help, but transportation 4 costs, parking on the beach, rising 5 healthcare costs, all of these things . You 6 know, I want to down the road, you know, 7 I know all of us commissioners are working 8 on things like transportation, affordable 9 housing, and all of that, but this is 10 potentially, you know, one step in the 11 direction of making Miami Beach a more 12 affordable place to live and to do 13 business , and I would love to hear ideas 14 from the chamber on other things that 15 we can do to help small businesses and our 16 workers have a better quality of life and 17 be a more successful business . 18 MR. GOLDBERG: Absolutely, and we' ll 19 continue, as you know, we work very 20 closely, you know, with you and the 21 administration all the issue effecting, you 22 know, anything that impacts, you know, not 23 just the businesses of Miami Beach but 24 residents and quality of life. So you know 25 we' re engaged with that, and we appreciate National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 59 1 your partnership with us and working with 2 us, and we' ll continue to do that, and 3 we thank you. 4 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: If I can 5 comment to just, I think, illustrate or 6 highlight what Commissioner Arriola said is 7 that, you know, if we pass this minimum 8 wage ordinance, we know that this alone 9 doesn' t solve the problem of the 10 affordability of workforce living in Miami 11 Beach, but it' s one piece to the puzzle, 12 and we know transportation is an issue, 13 we -- you know, we know that affordable 14 housing is an issue, we know that education 15 is an issue. 16 So for everyone who is here today 17 and for everyone who may be watching this 18 now or in the future, all of our emails are 19 on the website. If you have another piece 20 of that puzzle, it' s really important to us 21 for the quality of our city, it goes right 22 to the heart of the issues that effect our 23 quality of life like traffic and congestion 24 and just being a healthy vibrant community. 25 So our doors are open for your National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 60 1 feedback and ideas, and that extension 2 goes , of course, not just to the chamber 3 but to all of you. 4 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: And I have 5 one more thing to talk about with 6 specifically Michael Goldberg with the 7 chamber. You talked about the mom and pop 8 businesses . If I 'm correct, when it' s a 9 family-owned business and there is a 10 husband and wife and say a son or daughter 11 that are working the business, I believe 12 they are -- they can be exempted from this? 13 MR. ROSENWALD: That' s correct, 14 commissioner. The -- the FLSA the federal 15 standard guides who has to pay the minimum 16 wage, and that is businesses that make less 17 than $500 , 000 a year and exempted from that 18 is anyone with -- who is staffed solely by 19 immediate family members . So if you are 20 truly a mom and pop, even if you' re making 21 more than $500 , 000 a year, if only your 22 immediate family is working for you, then 23 you' re not subject to minimum wage at all . 24 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Thank you. 25 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Rob, in National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 61 1 reading to whom this applies , it' s $500 , 000 2 or more, but I also saw a clause that said 3 or the businesses engaged in interstate 4 commerce; is that correct? 5 MR. ROSENWALD : I think it' s "and 6 interstate commerce. " 7 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Oh, it' s 8 "and"? It' s "and" not "or, " it' s "and. " 9 MR. ROSENWALD: Yes, exactly. 10 And -- 11 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Because 12 everyone' s involved in interstate commerce 13 now-a-days . 14 MR. ROSENWALD: Yeah, it' s very hard 15 not to be, but if you truly aren' t, if you 16 don' t send anything outside of the state, 17 you wouldn' t be -- you wouldn' t be included 18 in it. You would be exempted also. 19 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: So it' s 20 500 ,000 "and"? 21 MR. ROSENWALD: Yes, that' s my 22 understanding, but you' re right, almost 23 everybody is covered. 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Everybody 25 under the supreme court. National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 62 1 MR. PAPY: I also wanted to clarify, 2 the comment was made about the business 3 that would be impacted, the small business . 4 The coverage is identical to the Fair Labor 5 Standards Act and the state law, the state 6 constitutional minimum wage ordinance, so 7 we' re not adding anyone who' s not already 8 covered under the federal and the state 9 law. So I just wanted to clarify that. 10 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What are all 11 these young kids doing here? I want to 12 hear from them. 13 MS . BACH: Good afternoon 14 commissioners . Good to see you all . My 15 name is Lili Bach, L-I-L-I , B-A-C-H. I 'm 16 with 32BJ with SEIU. The minimum wage 17 increase is a dire necessity all over the 18 state, especially right here in the City of 19 Miami Beach. Those who work hard we feel 20 deserve fair pay. Our members live in our 21 communities and attend our public schools 22 and overall contribute to our local 23 economies . 24 We hear from workers who want to 25 spend more time with their families but National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 63 1 simply cannot, because they' re running from 2 one low-paying job to other, therefore, not 3 having any time to spend with their 4 children or with their families , usually 5 having to work two to three jobs just 6 because the pay is not enough. 7 How does minimum wage jobs help our 8 communities? Quite frankly, they do not, 9 and how is the need to work two or three 10 low-wage jobs to survive helping our 11 economy and helping our people that live in 12 these communities , and again, it' s not 13 right. 14 I ' d actually like to challenge the 15 chamber to try to spend living on a week on 16 minimum wage , to see if maybe that could ti 17 help encourage them to be a little more 18 involved in being proactive in helping with 19 this so they can really feel what it' s like 20 to have to make certain cuts , whether it' s 21 to paying this bill or another bill, 22 whether it means that they have to bring 23 their child with them to work because they 24 cannot afford childcare and so on. 25 So Miami Beach needs to lift up our National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 64 1 workers and support increasing the minimum 2 wage, and we definitely encourage the 3 commission for doing so and support mayor 4 Levine as well, so thank you. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Lili -- 6 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: Lili, you know 7 we only make $6, 000 a year, right? 8 MS . BACH: Excuse me? 9 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: I said, you 10 know we only make $6, 000 a year, right? 11 MS . BACH: That' s why we have to 12 make sure that -- 13 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: I want to 14 check with the city attorney. You know 15 that commissioners make less than minimum 16 wage, a lot less . 17 MR. PAPY: We ' 11 take it up. 18 MS . BACH: This is for everyone. 19 MR. QUINCOCES : Good morning, 20 commissioners . My name is Richard 21 Quincoces, Q-U-I-N-C-O-C-E-S . First, 22 I want to thank Mayor Levine on fighting 23 for the working families of Miami Beach and 24 proposing this ordinance on raising the 25 minimum wage and you for hearing this and National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 65 1 considering it. 2 I 've been a resident of Miami for 3 over 25 years and have been a construction 4 worker for over ten. I come here, I 'm 5 speaking on my personal experience as a 6 construction worker. I work under union, 7 I worked under LIUNA Local 1652 , and I have 8 work with other people that are not 9 represented under my collective bargaining 10 agreement, and I have seen the struggles 11 that these families have firsthand. 12 I have seen how they have been able 13 to have to jump onto public assistance, and 14 the employer, the corporation, will tell 15 them this is the way to go do it. 16 I also -- I believe that these corporations 17 are earning year in and year out they earn 18 massive profits, and all they do is propose 19 for people to jump on public assistance. 20 So I ask you to please consider in helping 21 these people out and, you know, grow 22 Miami-Dade -- I mean, grow Miami. We' re 23 all residents here, and, you know, it' s 24 hard to live here. Thank you. 25 MR. BARFIELD: Hello, how you all National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 66 1 doing? 2 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Good. How 3 are you? Your name for the record? 4 MR. BARFIELD: My name is Isaiah 5 Barfield. Isaiah Barfield. Can you hear 6 me now? I 'm a fast food worker for KFC, 7 and as this gentleman was just saying, it' s 8 very, very difficult and hard to fight this 9 minimum wage, and at the moment it' s 8 . 52 10 is what I get approximately, and that is 11 clearly too little. 12 It' s a little too late, because, you 13 know, I 'm facing eviction, and because 14 I can' t pay my bills, I can' t really eat, 15 I loose pounds, and this is just me myself. 16 So, you know, for families I know it' s 17 devastating, and for them to get out there 18 with their children, try to encourage them 19 to eat out of a can of beans or to eat this 20 steal food that they can' t afford it' s 21 hurtful and downhearted that they get low 22 salary. And they have to stay up with 23 their children. Not only work two or three 24 jobs, but also make their families happy 25 when they' re not really happy with National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 67 1 themselves and the way that they are 2 treated. 3 So I 'm here just to say, just one 4 voice, that, please, give Miami Beach what 5 they need. Thank you. 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 7 Thank you for sharing your story. 8 MR. CUBA: Good afternoon 9 commissioners . My name is Juan Cuba, 10 J-U-A-N, C-U-B-A. I 'm going to tell you a 11 little bit about my personal experience, 12 but also I 'm going to read a letter into 13 the record from Rabbi Schiff. 14 First, I grew up in Miami . Since 15 I was three years old, I grew up in 16 Kendall, I lived in the City of Miami most 17 of my life. My parents worked minimum wage 18 jobs . My dad worked two or three jobs just 19 to make ends meet, and so did my mom. You 20 know, I would remember my dad had to 21 deliver pizzas, you know, was a maintenance 22 guy in condos, and how tough it was for him 23 and how much strain it caused our family. 24 So this bill, this minimum wage that 25 you guys are doing, it' s inspiring, and National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 68 1 it' s going to help so many families . It' s 2 about families , it' s about neighborhoods, 3 it' s about communities, because when 4 workers that are working two jobs are 5 barely making it and come home, and if you 6 give them a raise, it will mean so much to 7 them and their children, so thank you. 8 I have a letter here from Rabbi 9 Solomon Schiff, president of South Florida 10 Interfaith Worker Justice that I ' ll read 11 into the record. 12 Dear Mayor Levine and commissioners , 13 on behalf of South Florida Interfaith 14 Worker Justice and the faith communities 15 that we represent, we would like to commend 16 you for your efforts to support working 17 families in Miami Beach and to encourage 18 you to continue to do so by enacting the 19 Miami Beach living wage ordinance that will 20 be heard by the finance committee on June 21 3 , 2016. 22 You have the opportunity not only to 23 support our Miami Beach community through 24 those initially affected by the ordinance, 25 but also to affect many others due to the National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 69 1 ripple effects of the ordinance. 2 Additionally, Miami Beach can, once 3 again, serve as an exemplar and set a 4 ' positive tone for others in our county and 5 our state. Your actions in support of this 6 ordinance would embody our diverse faith 7 tradition by recognizing the inherent 8 worth, rights, and dignity of employees and 9 their families. 10 We urge you to support the Miami 11 Beach Minimum Living Wage Ordinance, 12 thereby benefitting not just our local 13 community but many others as well . 14 Sincerely, Rabbi Solomon Schiff. Thank 15 you. 16 MR. LICHTMAN: Good afternoon. My 17 name is Al Lichtman, A-L -- got that one? 18 L-I-C-H-T-M-A-N. Great presentations . 19 I think I 've got some bullet points here, I 20 think there' s some things we need to know, 21 but the federal minimum wage is not 22 currently tied to inflation or the cost of 23 living changes . 24 So in areas where the minimum wage 25 is not enough to pay for basic living and National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 70 1 employees who are working for minimum wage 2 and do not rely on government assistant 3 programs have greater hurdles to make a 4 living. That means that greater turnover 5 of employees who are consistently seeking 6 wages and to find new ways to make more 7 money. 8 Now cities like Santa Fe and San 9 Francisco, and I did a little research on 10 this , because there ' s a lot -- there ' s a 11 lot going on around the country and the 12 different cities that have already done 13 these things, and some of the things are 14 that the economic evidence indicates that 15 the highest city minimum wages enable in 16 U. S . cities to date have boosted earnings 17 without slowing job growth or causing 18 business relocations . 19 Now, an indication of this new wave 20 of action around local minimum wages was 21 the U. S . Conference of Mayors, the Cities 22 of Opportunity Task Force, which in August 23 of 2014 endorsed higher city minimum wage 24 wages, asking tools for fighting income 25 inequalities at the lower level . National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 71 1 Now, I ' ve worked on Miami Beach for 2 the last 35 years, and, you know, I 'd like 3 to keep it as a great place to work, visit, 4 and have fun. So thank you for your time. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 6 Other folks? Sir. 7 MR. DIXON: Marcus Dixon, SEIU, 8 Florida state counsel, M-A-R-C-U-S, D, as 9 in dog, I-X-O-N, as in November. 10 I just wanted to provide some 11 information based on some of the earlier 12 conversations . Two-thirds of minimum wage 13 workers in the United States are women, and 14 that, you know, puts it in perspective 15 exactly how much it affects families, but 16 in Florida the average underpaid worker is 17 40 years old, and most of them are women. 18 Another important fact is that low 19 wages are costing Florida taxpayers 20 $11 . 4 billion in public assistance each 21 year. That' s based on a report SEIU 22 published earlier this year called the High 23 Public Cost of Low Wages, and that' s taking 24 into consideration 10 public assistance 25 programs excluding Medicaid costs . National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 72 1 And to answer or respond to one 2 additional point that I heard a little bit 3 earlier is the cost for living in Miami 4 Beach. Using the Economic Policy Institute 5 as a resource, they have a family budget 6 calculator. If I could put it up on the 7 computer, I would, but it lays out for the 8 Miami, Miami Beach, Kendall Metro area the 9 cost of living, and so it takes into 10 consideration housing, food, 11 transportation, health care, and other 12 necessities and taxes . 13 So for a single individual, the cost 14 of living in this metropolitan area is 15 $31, 354 annually. So you think about that, 16 you think about the 16,000 that Cynthia 17 mentioned earlier in terms what of a 18 minimum wage worker actually gets , and you 19 wonder what exactly they' re doing to make 20 it through. 21 This calculator also allows you to 22 add children and the number of adults in 23 the household, so you stay with a single 24 adult and add a child, and that number 25 jumps from the 30 , 000 number up to $52 , 000 National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 73 1 annually. 2 That' s all I wanted to share with 3 you. Thank you. 4 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: I might add, 5 as we contemplate those numbers , that 6 obviously there' s no room in there for 7 savings, and there does come a point in all 8 of our lives when it' s time to retire and 9 we' re not able to work anymore, and then -- 10 you know, then we' re talking a hundred 11 percent gap, because there' s no way with 12 that model that people can be putting aside 13 money for their future which may have 14 higher healthcare costs and other issues . 15 MR. DIXON: Absolutely. Thank you. 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Matis . Let' s 17 hear from Matis . 18 MR. COHEN: Hi, Matis Cohen, 19 M-A-T-I-S, C-O-H-E-N. Truly, I 'm inspired 20 and moved by the testimony and stories that 21 I 've heard here today, and I -- I was also 22 educated with some of the numbers that 23 I was surprised to hear, and I 'm happy that 24 we had this open forum that we can have 25 that discussion, but as Commission Aleman National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 74 1 and Commissioner Malakoff, and Commissioner 2 Arriola, you' ve mentioned that it is only 3 one component. 4 And I think it would be a nice idea 5 if there was a City contribution, I call 6 it a "contribution" for lack of another 7 word, that would promote the -- in addition 8 to this, the businesses that actually have 9 residents working on the beach. So while 10 we' re talking about transportation, so a 11 resident that lives on the -- a resident 12 that is working on the beach, that small 13 business or a larger business can 14 benefit -- should have a beneficial -- 15 there should be some benefits to that 16 business that helps to embrace this type of 17 ordinance and long-term thinking, and just 18 an idea of something that might be a 19 win-win for everybody and for the city also 20 to contribute into this initiative. 21 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: It' s a good 22 idea. Can you maybe -- now or maybe later 23 you can come back to us with some ideas 24 there. I think that' s a good idea for a 25 lot of reasons . National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 75 1 MR. COHEN: Yeah, so -- so we 've had 2 a lot of conversations on this issue, and 3 there are some things and, of course, some 4 other ideas regarding workforce housing 5 that are attached to it as well, and 6 I think that the City had had many, many 7 years ago some kind of initiatives that 8 never took effect, but I think that they 9 can be combined, and I think that from a 10 holistic perspective, looking at the 11 housing, transportation, and wage as a 12 combination is a very healthy way to be 13 looking at it. Thank you. 14 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: It' s a great 15 idea. You know, at the end of this I ' ll 16 give you my comments on all of this, but, 17 you know, as I had mentioned earlier, even 18 if we raise the minimum wage, it' s still 19 tough to get by. 20 MR. COHEN: Yes . 21 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: So, you know, 22 the concern I have is, you know, with 23 traffic being a big problem for our 24 community, to the extent that the folks who 25 are trying to help here can' t actually live National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 76 1 here, we ' re not addressing traffic and the 2 other issues that we' re trying to tackle, 3 and perhaps there ' s a way to keep some of 4 these folks, either move them to Miami 5 Beach or keep some of our folks that are 6 living here but working elsewhere. 7 MR. COHEN: Right. 8 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: So I 'm very 9 interested in those ideas . 10 MR. COHEN: So when you touched 11 upon -- when you offered to hear the ideas , 12 it triggered the next stage, and we'd love 13 to have that conversation, because there 14 are a lot of ideas coming around right now 15 regarding how to make this a combination 16 that solves the real problem. It' s not 17 just one element, and when I hear people 18 working two and three jobs , it hurts to 19 hear it, and to live on the beach, and 20 that' s a big sacrifice. 21 We'd like to find ways to 22 incentivize them and to loosen the burden 23 that it' s not just about an increase in 24 wage, but it' s about the quality of life as 25 well . National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 77 1 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 2 MR. COHEN: Thank you. 3 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Matt, did you 4 want to come up? 5 MR. LAND: Sure. 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Folks , we' ll 7 go maybe another 15 minutes or so, and then 8 we' ll close it off. 9 MR. LAND: Matthew Land, 10 M-A-T-T-H-E-W, L-A-N-D, political director 11 for the Southeast Labor District Counsel 12 and also Commissioner Aleman appointee or 13 one of her appointees the Miami Beach 14 Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. 15 I commend you all for taking this 16 position today and agree with all the 17 comments about this is a multi-pronged 18 approach. It' s not just wages, it' s 19 transportation and housing, and just to 20 give you all a very brief preview, so our 21 affordable housing advisory committee is 22 currently contemplating multiple different 23 legislative proposals . 24 We hope to bring something forward 25 to you guys in the coming months, give you National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 78 1 guys a buffet of options, what have you, to 2 say these are some great ideas . We 've been 3 hearing from some phenomenal people like 4 Ralph Rosado, hearing from the folks at UM. 5 I ' ve been consulting with people 6 like Commissioner Francis Suarez , 7 Commissioner Xavier Suarez , Commissioner 8 Barbara Jordan on things that they' re doing 9 all around Miami-Dade County, because 10 there' s some really great things that 11 we can do to address affordable workforce 12 housing, and that' s one of the areas Miami 13 is certainly lagging in addressing, and we 14 look forward to bringing you those soon. 15 Thanks . 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 17 MR. CIRALDO: Daniel Ciraldo, 18 C-I-R-A-L-D-O. 19 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Daniel , I 'm 20 used to seeing you with the historical 21 preservation. It' s like a parallel 22 universe here. 23 MR. CIRALDO: I know, and actually I 24 have to -- I have to thank Wendy and 25 Jackie, because during the convention National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 79 1 center hotel vote, I learned about how the 2 hotel was proposed to have a living wage 3 for its workers , and I promised them at the 4 time that if we won and the hotel was 5 defeated, that I would be here to stand in 6 support of living wage, so hear I am. 7 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You know 8 we' re working hard to bring it back. 9 MR. CIRALDO: I know. I know, we' re 10 going to build consensus and make a great 11 hotel, but yeah, I think Miami Beach has 12 been so successful with its hotels, with 13 its historic preservation, with its real 14 estate that now is a great time to catch up 15 with the workers who really make it all 16 happen, and I think it' s a great idea, and, 17 hopefully, you' ll all support it. 18 And also in terms of housing, you 19 know, the North Shore is a great area that 20 has a lot of housing where people live and 21 work in Miami Beach. I live in Flamingo 22 Park, it' s a historic district. Everyone 23 in my building works in Miami Beach, and a 24 lot of them are hotel workers . 25 So let' s also look to our historic National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 80 1 district and other areas to protect and 2 improve the housing there, because it is 3 one of the last remaining affordable places 4 to live. Thank you. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 6 You got up earlier, do you want to speak? 7 I saw you got sworn in, I didn' t know 8 if you wanted to speak. Okay. Anybody 9 else? 10 No? Okay. Great. 11 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: The children 12 are shy. 13 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You know 14 what, it' s good practice for you guys . One 15 of you brave ones , stand up. This will be 16 good. You' ll remember this for the rest of 17 your life. It' s okay. 18 MS . FLEURILUS : He said he wanted to 19 speak. 20 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: We would love 21 to hear from you. 22 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: It' s good 23 practice. I want to hear from you. 24 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: Then you' ll 25 get to -- yeah, all right, and you' ll get National Reporting Service • (305) 373-7295 Page 81 1 to see yourself on television later, so 2 that' s fun too. 3 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Yeah, you' ll 4 be on TV. Somebody take his picture so 5 he can show off. What' s your name? 6 MR. DENISON TOUZE : I think they 7 should -- 8 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What' s your 9 name, and where do you go to school? 10 MR. DENISON TOUZE: Denison, and 11 I go to school at Woodlands Middle, and 12 I think they should raise the minimum wage 13 to $15 because -- 14 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: He' s a good 15 negotiator. 16 MR. DENISON TOUZE : -- people 17 deserve it, because they' re like working 18 for their families, and it' s not fair to 19 them. They' re like overworked, and they 20 don' t get like paid enough, and yeah. 21 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Thank you. 22 Wait, wait, wait, wait. Come back. Come 23 back. Yeah, Denison, thank you so much for 24 your comments . You' re very brave, and 25 if you guys want to come up, I ' d love to National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 82 1 hear from you, too. 2 What are you thinking about being 3 when you grow up? 4 MR. DENISON TOUZE: Engineer. 5 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Very good. 6 Nice. Do you like math? 7 MR. DENISON TOUZE: Yes . 8 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Good. Stick 9 to it. That' s the hottest career. You' ll 10 have a job for life, a good paying job, 11 you' ll never make minimum wage, and you 12 will -- and our country needs more 13 engineers . It' s a big problem that 14 we have. So stick to it, don' t give up. 15 Come on. You won' t regret it, 16 I promise. Come up. What' s your name. 17 MR. NICK TOUZE : Nick Touze. 18 MS . FLEURLIUS : Just go say your 19 name. 20 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Come on up. 21 We've got time to kill . What' s your name? 22 MR. NICK TOUZE: My name is Nick 23 Touze. 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. Good. 25 Where do you go to school? National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 83 1 MR. NICK TOUZE: Poinciana 2 Elementary. 3 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Great. How 4 do you feel about this issue? 5 MR. NICK TOUZE : Sorry for the 6 people that can' t make enough money to 7 raise their families . 8 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. What 9 do you want to be when you grow up? 10 MR. NICK TOUZE: A football player. 11 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: It' s a little 12 bit tougher, but that' s good. Do you play 13 now? 14 MR. NICK TOUZE: Yes . 15 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Flag or pads, 16 tackle? 17 MR. NICK TOUZE: Pads . 18 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Pads, oh, 19 tackle. Where do you play, what park? 20 MR. NICK TOUZE: WBFL West Boynton. 21 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Nice. What 22 position do you like playing? 23 MR. NICK TOUZE: Linebacker. 24 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Good 25 position. Who is your favorite football National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 84 1 player? 2 MR. NICK TOUZE: Ray Lewis . 3 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Mine too. I 4 love Ray. He' s amazing. He' s great. 5 Well, good. That wasn' t so bad, right? 6 You did your first public speaking. 7 We 've got one more. You can' t be 8 the odd -- the odd guy out. You' re shy. 9 I just want your name. I just want your 10 name. 11 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : Can you hear 12 me? 13 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What' s your 14 name? Yeah, I can hear you. What' s your 15 name? 16 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : My name is Noah 17 Fleurilus . 18 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Do you like 19 football? 20 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : I like 21 basketball . 22 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You like 23 basketball . Who you rooting for? Who are 24 you rooting for in The Finals, the Warriors 25 or the Cavaliers? National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 85 1 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : Warriors . 2 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Warriors . 3 All right. Me, too . Do you know who Cam 4 Newton, the football player, Cam Newton? 5 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : No. 6 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You kind of 7 look like him. Very handsome guy, and a 8 great football player. So where do you go 9 to school. 10 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : Benoist Farms 11 Elementary. 12 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: What do you 13 want to be when you grow up? 14 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : A fire fighter. 15 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Oh, good, 16 good. We have great -- we have, I think, 17 the best fire department in the whole 18 county and the whole state, so when you get 19 old enough, we' d love to have you apply 20. here, and if you'd like to come see a fire 21 station, I ' ll arrange that. I ' ll have my 22 aid give you his business card, and you 23 call us, and we ' ll have the firefighters 24 show you around. Deal? 25 MR. NOAH FLEURILUS : Yes . National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 86 1 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: That wasn' t 2 so bad, right? That wasn' t so bad. Okay. 3 Anybody else? 4 Okay. I 'm going to close the public 5 hearing, and I would love to hear from my 6 colleagues on this issue. 7 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I 'm very 8 much in support of this ordinance, and 9 I thing we've heard a lot of good data 10 today. About 38 cities that have enacted 11 their own minimum wage legislation with 12 positive benefits not only to the workers, 13 but to the businesses . 14 I think that the impact has been 15 positive, not adverse. I think that we' re 16 on the right track to -- to do not only the 17 wages, but also, as I mentioned before, 18 Commissioner Aleman and I both are working 19 on stopping illegal short-term rentals 20 which is having a very negative impact on 21 the hospitality industry, and I think that 22 is really going to help and enable the 23 hotels to feel better about -- about paying 24 the living wage. 25 I think we also need to continue National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 87 1 looking. We right now have trolleys that 2 are free of charge to everybody in Miami 3 Beach, and we' re going to be putting in the 4 Middle Beach, so that worker who are 5 working on Miami Beach will have free 6 transportation going South Beach, Middle 7 Beach and North Beach. I think that will 8 help. 9 I also think, because transportation 10 was one of the main items , and the other 11 was workforce housing. We are putting out 12 a request for proposal for several new 13 garages in the city, and part of each of 14 the garages will be a component for 15 workforce housing. 16 There ' s a big need for housing in 17 the city, and as Matthew Land mentioned, 18 our affordable Housing Committee is also 19 looking at that with some, hopefully, 20 out-of-the-box ways that we can provide 21 affordable housing as well as workforce 22 housing in the City of Miami Beach. 23 So I thank you all for coming here 24 today, and thank you so much for giving us 25 this additional facts, figures, and National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 88 1 information. 2 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: I just want to 1 3 echo what my colleagues have said. I 'm 4 interested as well in some of the ideas 5 that were raised about additional benefits 6 that we might as a city be able to provide 7 to businesses that employ residents and 8 looking forward to some additional creative 9 thinking there. 10 I was really, similar to what 11 Mr. Cohen said, very impressed, inspired, 12 and humbled by a lot of the research and 13 analyses that was shared by some of the 14 experts today. I found that very helpful. 15 I was really shocked to learn that 16 globally Miami ' s income inequality exceeds 17 that of Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro and 18 Mexico City. I found that -- you know, 19 it was a bit -- a bit shocked by that. 20 I did know we had one of the highest wage 21 gaps in terms of the -- I can' t remember 22 the terminology for it, but basically the 23 77 , 000 that it takes to live, and that' s 24 not an excessive lifestyle that they' re 25 modeling, that' s a very basic lifestyle. National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 89 1 So the gap against the current 2 minimum wage is pretty shocking, and so 3 I think we can see why we've had with -- 4 combine that with just the soaring property 5 values driving increased rents, combine 6 it with, as Commissioner Malakoff said, 7 short-term rentals really stealing -- 8 stealing jobs and also not providing, you 9 know, the funding to the city that we can 10 use to offset, you know, some of these 11 issues and help us with these issues . 12 So I think it was an excellent 13 forum. I 'm proud to be a part of it, and 14 thank you to everyone who came out and 15 stayed, and congratulations to the young 16 men who did testify, thank you for that, 17 and yeah. 18 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: I just -- I 19 just have some notes and thoughts . I ' ll 20 just kind of ramble a little bit and try to 21 be coherent. So, you know, I got to this 22 point of, obviously, favoring this 23 resolution and moving in the direction of 24 raising our minimum wage in Miami Beach. 25 I did a lot of research, read a lot National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 90 1 of studies from different economic -- 2 economists and think tanks, and the 3 overwhelming consensus , I was very 4 surprised to read, is that minimum wage 5 does not hurt jobs and it does not hurt 6 economies or businesses, and so that gave 7 me comfort, because I don' t want to see 8 businesses suffer, because then we all 9 suffer. 10 But what really got me to the place 11 where I 'm at now in supporting this is 12 that, you know, when you look at the impact 13 on human beings that get trapped in the 14 cycle of poverty, it' s -- it' s not easy to 15 get out, you know, and I -- you know, I 'm 16 embarrassed that our community in Dade 17 County has the income inequality that 18 it does . I 'm not sure that this will break 19 that, but if it -- if it helps get us out 20 of that cycle, then I 'm going to be very 21 proud to have supported this legislation. 22 It' s going to be a fight. It' s 23 likely going to end up in court. I think 24 the, City is ready and eager to challenge 25 the state on this . Miami Beach has always National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 91 1 been a progressive city. That' s why, I 2 know, my colleagues and I ran for office. 3 We' re very proud of this community, and the 4 folks that live here and work here. 5 We 've led the way on LGBT issues . 6 We' re leading the nation on sea level rise. 7 We have a very open and transparent 8 government. We' re leading on environmental 9 causes now, and, again, the State is 10 challenging us on a lot of those things . 11 We' re trying to be very progressive on 12 transportation, tackling our transportation 13 issues . We' re all going to be seeing a lot 14 more of that in the coming months . 15 You know, we welcome guests from all 16 over the world, so, you know, what are 17 we saying to the world about who we are as 18 a community, and, you know, income 19 inequality is a big problem in our country, 20 and Miami Beach has always been a 21 progressive city, and I think people expect 22 us to lead as a city, and this is sending a 23 signal to the State and to the rest of the 24 nation that we' re willing to do things that 25 we think are right, and even if it' s going National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 92 1 to be hard to do, we' re willing to do it. 2 We ' re tackling sea level rise at a 3 time when this is an existential crisis for 4 us, but we' re not backing down. We think 5 we can meet the challenge. I think we can 6 meet the challenge of dealing with income 7 inequality in our community. 8 It' s not a silver bullet. Raising 9 the minimum wage is not going to get us 10 where we all want to be in making Miami 11 Beach an afford place and having a high 12 quality of life, not just for people in the 13 upper income level, but for all people. So 14 you' ve heard my colleagues here talking 15 about things that we want to do, and 16 we need your help. 17 Affordable housing, transportation, 18 we need your help to help us get there. 19 We have a lot of good ideas, but we need 20 public support to get there. Raising the 21 minimum wage is not the only way to help 22 deal with affordability and quality of 23 life. We' re prepared to do everything 24 we can to get us there . 25 Property taxes, which is a big way National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 93 1 that we found ourselves here at the city, 2 went up 13 . 3 percent is 2014 , and just 3 recently, we got the numbers two days ago, 4 another 12 .2 percent. That tells us that 5 we have the money to solve a lot of these 6 issues . 7 I think this commission has the will 8 to do it, but we need your support, and so 9 I 'm saying this to the public at large, 10 we need to come together as a community and 11 lead the way for our state and our nation 12 on how communities can build for the future 13 for everybody, not just the upper income 14 folks . 15 So I 'm proud that we' re here today 16 and taking this initiative to raise the 17 minimum wage, and I look forward to, you 18 know, winning this in court if it comes to 19 that. I think for the small business 20 owners out there who might be worried with 21 this , I think you heard from myself and my 22 colleagues that we' re also going to do 23 everything we can to mitigate any negative 24 effects this may have. 25 The implementation is an 18-month National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 94 1 implementation, and it' s phased out over a 2 period of years so that businesses can 3 prepare. We' re dealing with transportation 4 and affordable housing, which will also 5 help offset some of the costs that 6 businesses today have to absorb in their 7 workers and in their businesses . 8 I believe, correct me if I 'm wrong, 9 is there a provision in the resolution for 10 an economic study every couple of years to 11 see the impact of this? 12 MR. PAPY: At the end of the period, 13 each year there will be an annual review of 14 the cost of living. That' s how it' s set 15 up. That' s the way we -- 16 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. Oh, 17 wonderful . We have a present for you guys . 18 Do you have something, Joy? 19 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: Yes , I just 20 wanted to mention besides the minorities 21 that are so much impacted, I just wanted to 22 repeat, again, that two-thirds of the 23 minimum wage workers are women, and I think 24 that' s so important. 25 It' s a wonderful -- it' s a terrible National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 95 1 statistic, but it' s good to know, and 2 I think that when women are trying to raise 3 a family, and often they' re single women, 4 it' s often impossible, and this is really 5 going to help. This is important. And I 6 wanted to repeat something that Juan Cuba 7 mentioned in his letter from Rabbi Schiff. 8 This is for workers to show their 9 worth, their rights , and dignity, and 10 I think it' s something we have to keep in 11 mind, whether there are some problems in 12 implementing, we have to think what the end 13 result is, and it' s going to be helping the 14 minorities, helping woman, and validating 15 the dignity and worth of every worker. 16 Thank you. 17 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: You know, it 18 makes me proud that we are Miami Beach, and 19 we ' re leading the way on so many of the 20 issues that I mentioned, and yet, you know, 21 it' s troubling to me that we live in a 22 state that takes great pride, as the 23 governor did a couple of weeks ago in 24 California, going out and saying that 25 we have the lowest wages , as if it' s National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 96 1 something to be proud of. 2 We live in a state that tries to 3 preempt municipalities from passing 4 environmental laws to protect their own 5 communities . You know, we live in a state 6 that, you know, currently denies climate 7 change, and we ' re at the ground level of 8 sea level rise. 9 You know, so it doesn' t matter what 10 the State is going to do, Miami Beach will 11 lead, and we will be progressive, and 12 we will show the State what needs to be 13 done to make this the best state in our 14 nation, so do we need a motion to pass the 15 resolution? 16 MR. PAPY: It seems to me you could 17 make a motion to endorse it and support 18 it. 19 COMMISSIONER MALAKOFF: I move the 20 item to move forward with this ordinance 21 amending Chapter 18 of the city code 22 entitled "Businesses, " and adding this to 23 it. 24 COMMISSIONER ALEMAN: I second it. 25 COMMISSIONER ARRIOLA: Okay. Passes National Reporting Service ( 305) 373-7295 Page 97 1 unanimously. 2 To the three young men -- to the 3 three young men that were bold enough to 4 come up and speak, we have something for 5 you, come on up. 6 (Thereupon, the meeting was 7 concluded at 2 : 53 p.m. ) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 Page 98 1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 2 3 STATE OF FLORIDA • 4 COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE : 5 6 7 I , Matthew J. Haas, shorthand 8 reporter, do hereby certify that I was authorized 9 to and did stenographically report the foregoing 10 proceedings and that the transcript is a true and 11 complete record of my stenographic notes . 12 13 14 15 Dated this 5th day of June, 2016. 16 17 18 �= . j auTc4 19 4 s t 20 t � aF 21 22 MATTHEW J. HAAS Court reporter 23 24 25 National Reporting Service (305) 373-7295 NATIONAL ELP L PLOYMENT PROJECT TESTIMONY Testimony of Laura Huizar National Employment Law Project Increasing the Minimum Wage in Miami Beach Hearing before the City of Miami Beach Finance and Citywide Projects Committee June 3, 2016 Laura Huizar Staff Attorney National Employment Law Project 2040 S Street NW,Lower Level Washington,D.C.20009 (202)683-4825 Ihuizar @nelp.org Good afternoon and thank you for the opportunity to testify today. My name is Laura Huizar,and am a staff attorney at the National Employment Law Project(NELP). NELP is a non-profit,non-partisan research and advocacy organization specializing in employment policy. We are based in New York with offices across the country,and we partner with federal, state,and local lawmakers on a wide range of workforce issues. I am based in our D.C. office. Across the country,our staff are recognized as policy experts in areas such as unemployment insurance,wage and hour enforcement,and,as is relevant for today's hearing,the minimum wage. We have worked with dozens of city councils and state legislatures across the country and with the U.S. Congress on measures to boost pay for low-wage workers. NELP has worked with most of the cities in the United States that have adopted higher city minimum wages in recent years and is familiar with their economic experiences. NELP testifies today in support of increasing the City of Miami Beach's minimum wage to$13.31 per hour by 2020,as Mayor Philip Levine has proposed. In response to declining wages for low- wage workers across the country,as well as state and federal minimum wage rates that fail to provide for a basic standard of living,the number of cities throughout the country that have increased their minimum wage has grown significantly in recent years. In 2003,only two cities, Santa Fe, New Mexico,and San Francisco, had enacted local minimum wage laws. Between 2013 and 2014,almost twenty cities enacted their own higher minimum wage,and to date,thirty-eight cities have done so.' Cities and states are also increasingly adopting minimum wage rates at or near$15 per hour. California and New York approved a statewide $15 minimum wage earlier this year. SeaTac, Washington,which was the first city to adopt a$15 minimum wage,did so in 2013. San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee brokered an agreement between labor and business to place a$15 minimum wage on the November 2014 ballot,which the voters overwhelmingly approved,and the Los Angeles city council approved a$15 minimum wage in June of last year. Chicago adopted minimum wage legislation in 2014 that would raise the city's minimum wage to$13 per hour by 2019. Oregon also enacted legislation earlier this year that would raise the state's minimum wage to$12.50,$13.50,or $14.75 by 2022,depending on the region. A full list of recent minimum wage increases can be found at the Raise the Minimum Wage website.2 The most rigorous modern research on the impact of raising minimum wages shows that raises increase worker earnings with negligible adverse impact on employment levels. As more and more U.S.cities enact local minimum wages,the research has similarly shown that such local measures have no adverse effect on jobs,and implementation of higher local wages has proven manageable for employers. The benefits for low-wage workers and their families of higher wages have been very significant, raising wages in the face of broader economic trends that have led to stagnant and falling wages across the bottom of our economy,reducing economic hardship,lifting workers out of poverty,and improving other life outcomes. Low paying industries are disproportionately fueling job growth today,with more and more adults spending their careers in these positions. Raising the wage floor,which has badly eroded over the decades even as corporate profits have skyrocketed, is urgently needed to ensure that local economies can rely on workers'spending power to recover and that the growing numbers of workers relying on low wages to make ends meet can contribute fully to this recovery. 2 Raising the minimum wage across the country, including in Miami Beach,would go a long way toward restoring the minimum wage to where it was at its peak,when unemployment rates were low,the minimum wage reflected much higher purchasing power,and the minimum wage was equal to half of what the median worker earned. Who Would Benefit From A Higher Minimum Wage in Miami Beach? The cost of living in Miami Beach substantially exceeds the cost of living in most other parts of Florida and ranks among the highest in the country.3 A single worker in the Miami/Miami Beach/Kendall metro area with no children needs at least$31,354 per year—or at least$15 per hour working full time—to get by.4 A single worker with one child requires$52,068,or more than $25 per hour,for basic living costs.5 The Growing List of Cities and States Enacting Minimum Wage Increases Reflects a Deepening Wage Crisis and Popular Support for Bold Change The U.S.economy has seen steady growth and improvement in the unemployment rate in recent years,but wages have been flat or declining for much of the labor force.6 Averaged across all occupations, real median hourly wages declined by 4 percent from 2009 to 2014,and lower-wage occupations experienced greater declines in their real wages than did higher-wage occupations.? Moreover,job growth over the past year—and in the recovery overall—continues to be unbalanced, with especially pronounced job gains in lower-wage industries and slow growth in mid-wage industries. There are approximately 1.2 million fewer jobs in mid and higher-wage industries than there were prior to the recession,while there are 2.3 million more jobs in lower-wage industries.8 Thus,low-wage workers and families are being squeezed between flat pay and rising living costs. The worsening prospects and opportunities for low-wage workers have prompted a record number of cities,counties,and states to enact higher minimum wage rates for their residents. Since November 2012,nearly 17 million workers throughout the country have earned wage increases through a combination of states and cities raising their minimum wage rates; executive orders by city,state and federal leaders;and individual companies raising their pay scales.9 Of those workers, nearly 10 million will receive gradual raises to $15 per hour.10 More than fifty cities and states have raised their minimum wage since 2012.11 As the Fight for$15 movement gathers strength,advocates in a rapidly growing list of localities and states are calling for a$15 minimum wage. Los Angeles,San Francisco,Seattle,SeaTac, Washington,and Emeryville,California,have already enacted a$15 minimum wage for all workers.12 New York and California approved a statewide$15 minimum wage earlier this year.13 More than a dozen cities and counties are currently pushing for a$15 minimum,and the list of states considering the same is rapidly expanding.14 States now considering legislative proposals and/or ballot initiatives that would raise the statewide minimum wage to$15 include Missouri and New Jersey.15 Recent polling data shows that approximately two out of three individuals support a$15 minimum wage,and support among low-wage workers is even higher.16 A poll of low-wage workers commissioned by NELP found that approximately 75 percent of low-wage workers support a$15 minimum wage and a union.17 It also found that 69 percent of unregistered respondents would register to vote if there were a presidential candidate who supported raising the minimum wage to $15 and making it easier for workers to join a union,and 65 percent of registered voters reported that they are more likely to vote if a candidate supports $15 and a union for all workers.18 3 The trend in localities and states pushing for higher minimum wage rates will likely continue to intensify as wages continue to decline, inequality remains at historically high levels,and the federal government fails to take bold action to ensure that hard-working individuals can make ends meet. Higher Wages from Minimum Wage Increases Have Very Significant Beneficial Effects for Low-Income Individuals and Households The higher incomes that result from minimum wage increases have very direct and tangible impacts on the lives of the workers affected and their families. Significant increases in minimum wages have proven an effective strategy for addressing declining wages and opportunity for low- wage workers by raising pay broadly across the bottom of the city economy. For example,over the decade that San Francisco's strong minimum wage has been in effect,it has raised pay by more than $1.2 billion for more than 55,000 workers,and it has permanently raised citywide pay rates for the bottom 10 percent of the labor force.19 The widely recognized success of San Francisco's minimum wage led Mayor Ed Lee to broker an agreement with business and labor to place an increase to$15 on the November 2014 ballot,which the voters overwhelmingly approved. The higher pay resulting from minimum wage increases translates to a range of other important improvements in the lives of struggling low-paid workers and their households. For workers with the very lowest incomes,studies show that minimum wage increases lift workers and their families out of poverty.20 Similarly,higher incomes for low-wage workers and their households translate to improved educational attainment and health. For example,a recent study by the National Institutes of Health determined that"[a]n additional$4000 per year for the poorest households increases educational attainment by one year at age 21."21 Another study found that raising California's minimum wage to$13 per hour by 2017"would significantly benefit health and well-being."22 It stated that"Californians would experience fewer chronic diseases and disabilities; less hunger, smoking and obesity; and lower rates of depression and bipolar illness."23 Moreover,"[i]n the long run, raising the minimum wage would prevent the premature deaths of hundreds of lower-income Californians each year."24 Yet another study found that high dropout rates among low-income children can be linked to parents'low-wage jobs and that youth in low-income families have a greater likelihood of experiencing health problems.25 The Most Rigorous Research Shows That Higher Minimum Wages Raise Worker Incomes without Reducing Employment The most rigorous research over the past 20 years—examining scores of state and local minimum wage increases across the U.S.—demonstrates that these increases have raised workers'incomes without reducing employment. This substantial weight of scholarly evidence reflects a significant shift in the views of the economics profession,away from a former view that higher minimum wages cost jobs. As Bloomberg News summarized in 2012: [A] wave of new economic research is disproving those arguments about job losses and youth employment. Previous studies tended not to control for regional economic trends that were already affecting employment levels,such as a manufacturing-dependent state that was shedding jobs.The new research looks at micro-level employment patterns for a more accurate employment picture.The studies find minimum-wage increases even provide an economic 4 boost,albeit a small one,as strapped workers immediately spend their raises.26 The most sophisticated of the new wave of minimum wage studies,"Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders,"was published in 2010 by economists at the Universities of California, Massachusetts,and North Carolina in the prestigious Review of Economics and Statistics.27 That study carefully analyzed minimum wage impacts across state borders by comparing employment patterns in more than 250 pairs of neighboring counties in the U.S. that had different minimum wage rates between 1990 and 2006. The study's innovative approach of comparing neighboring counties on either side of a state line is generally recognized as especially effective at isolating the true impact of minimum wage differences,since neighboring counties otherwise tend to have very similar economic conditions,and the study has been lauded as state-of-the-art by the nation's top labor economists,such as Harvard's Lawrence Katz,MIT's David Autor,and MIT's Michael Greenstone. (By contrast,studies often cited by the opponents of raising the minimum wage that compare one state to another—and especially those comparing states in different regions of the U.S.—cannot as effectively isolate the impact of the minimum wage,because different states face different economic conditions,of which varying minimum wage rates is but one.) Consistent with a long line of similar research,the Dube,Lester,and Reich study found no difference in job growth rates in the data from the 250 pairs of neighboring counties—such as Washington State's Spokane County compared with Idaho's Kootenai County where the minimum wage was substantially lower—and found no evidence that higher minimum wages harmed states' competitiveness by pushing businesses across the state line.28 However,it is not simply individual state-of-the-art studies,but the whole body of the most rigorous modern research on the minimum wage that now indicates that higher minimum wages have had little impact on employment levels. This is most clearly demonstrated by several recent "meta-studies"surveying research in the field. For example,a meta-study of 64 studies of the impact of minimum wage increases published in the British Journal of Industrial Relations in 2009 shows that the bulk of the studies find close to no impact on employment.29 This is vividly illustrated by a graph from the meta-study showing the results clustered around zero: Funnel Graph of Estimated Minimum Wage Effects (n=1,492) 350 300 c ! • 250 1° 200 1p 1 c 150 ✓▪ 100 50 0 --20 45 40 -5 0 5 10 Elasticity Source:Doucouriagos and Stanley(2009) 5 Another recent meta-study by Paul Wolfson and Dale Belman of the minimum wage literature demonstrates similar results.3° Further underscoring how minimum wage increases are simply not a major factor affecting job growth,economists at the Center for Economic&Policy Research and Goldman Sachs have noted that the U.S.states that have raised their minimum wages above the minimal federal level are enjoying stronger job growth than those that have not.31 The Evidence from Cities,in Particular,That Have Adopted Significantly Higher Local Minimum Wages Similarly Shows That They Have Not Cost Jobs and That Implementation Has Proven Manageable for Employers The experiences of cities with higher local minimum wages—and the most rigorous economic research on the impact of city wage laws—have shown that they have raised wages broadly without slowing job growth or hurting local employers. The two U.S.cities that have had higher local minimum wages for the longest period are San Francisco,California,and Santa Fe, New Mexico. Both adopted significantly higher local minimum wages in 2003 and the impact of the minimum wages has been the subject of sophisticated economic impact studies. In San Francisco,a 2007 study by University of California researchers gathered employment and hours data from restaurants in San Francisco as well as from surrounding counties that were not covered by the higher minimum wage and found that the higher wage had not led San Francisco employers to reduce either their employment levels or employee hours worked.32 A follow-up 2014 study examined the combined impact on San Francisco employers of the city's minimum wage ordinance and of other city compensation mandates that cumulatively raised employment costs 80 percent above the level of the federal minimum wage. The study again found no adverse effect on employment levels or hours,and found that food service jobs—the sector most heavily affected—actually grew about 17 percent faster in San Francisco than in surrounding counties during that period.33 In Santa Fe,a similar 2006 study conducted after the city raised its minimum wage 65 percent above the state rate compared job growth in Santa Fe with that in Albuquerque (which at that time did not have a higher city minimum wage). It determined that"[o]verall,...the living wage had no discernible impact on employment per firm,and that Santa Fe actually did better than Albuquerque in terms of employment changes."34 A sophisticated 2011 study of higher minimum wages in San Francisco, Santa Fe,and Washington, D.C.,compared employment impacts to control groups in surrounding suburbs and cities. It similarly found that"[t]he results for fast food,food services,retail,and low-wage establishments .. .support the view that citywide minimum wages can raise the earnings of low-wage workers, without a discernible impact on their employment...."35 In addition,the actual experiences of cities that have recently raised the minimum wage at the local level have shown that such increases have been manageable. For example, in San Jose, California, business groups made similar predictions before voters in 2012 approved raising the city's minimum wage. But the actual results did not bear out those fears. As the Wall Street Journal reported,"Mast- food hiring in the region accelerated once the higher wage was in place. By early [2014],the pace of employment gains in the San Jose area beat the improvement in the entire state of California."36 USA 6 Today similarly found, "[i]nterviews with San Jose workers, businesses and industry officials show [the city minimum wage] has improved the lives of affected employees while imposing minimal costs on employers."37 The same pattern of dire predictions followed by manageable real world implementation was repeated when SeaTac,Washington,phased in its$15 minimum wage—the nation's first at that level. As The Seattle Times reported,"[f]or all the political uproar it caused,SeaTac's closely watched experiment with a$15 minimum wage has not created a large chain reaction of lost jobs and higher prices ...."38 The Washington Post similarly reported that"[t]hose who opposed the$15 wage in SeaTac and Seattle admit that there has been no calamity so far,"and highlighted how even though Tom Douglas,a Seattle restauranteur,stated in April 2014 that a$15 wage could "'be the most serious threat to our ability to compete–and that he"'would lose maybe a quarter of the restaurants in town,–as of September 2014,he had opened,or announced, five new restaurants that year.39 In Seattle,while many business owners supported the increase,other business owners predicted that increasing the city's minimum wage to $15 would lead to dramatic job losses for restaurants and strain on small businesses. An article by the Puget Sound Business Journal reported in October 2015 that the restaurant business in Seattle is,in fact,booming.40 More recent reports confirm that neither the city's economy nor the restaurant industry has suffered.41 A few months after Seattle began phasing in its minimum wage, the region's unemployment rate hit an eight-year low of 3.6 percent, significantly lower than the state unemployment rate of 5.3 percent.42 Since Seattle passed its trailblazing$15 minimum wage,the number of food services and beverage industry business licenses issued in the city has increased by 6 percent.43 Low Wages Paid By Large Profitable Employers Present a Significant Cost to the Public by Forcing Workers to Rely on Public Assistance in Order to Afford Basic Necessities Nationally, nearly three quarters (73 percent) of enrollments in America's major public benefits programs are from working families. With wages that leave their earnings below subsistence levels,these workers must rely on additional support from programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Medicaid,Children's Health Insurance Programs,and the Earned Income Tax Credit(EITC) in order to afford basics like food,housing,and health care. Data available for some of the largest employers in the retail and fast-food industries indicate that the low wages paid by profitable companies like Walmart and McDonald's entail substantial costs for the public,as a whole. A 2013 report from the Democratic Staff of the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce estimates that low wages paid at a single Walmart supercenter cost taxpayers between $900,000 and$1.7 million on average per year.44 Similarly,a 2013 study from the University of California-Berkeley found that the low wages paid by companies in the fast-food industry cost taxpayers an average of$7 billion per year.45 A companion study from NELP found that the bulk of these costs stem from the ten largest fast-food chains, which account for an estimated$3.9 billion per year in public costs.46 7 Thank you so much for the opportunity to testify today. I would be happy to answer any questions that you may have. For more information,please contact NELP Staff Attorney Laura Huizar at lhuizarPnelp.org. For more about NELP, visit www.nelp.org or www.raisetheminimumwage.org. 1 National Employment Law Project,City Minimum Wage Laws: Recent Trends and Economic Evidence(Apr. 2016),available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/City-Minimum-Wage-Laws-Recent-Trends- Economic-Evidence.pdf; Raise the Minimum Wage, Local Minimum Wage Laws and Current Campaigns, http://www.raisetheminimumwage.com/pages/local-minimum-wage(last viewed Jun. 1,2016). 2 Raise the Minimum Wage,Campaigns,http://www.raisetheminimumwage.com/pages/campaigns/ (last viewed May 31,2016). 3 Economic Policy Institute,Family Budget Map,http://www.epi.org/resources/budget/budget-map/(last viewed May 31,2016). 4 Economic Policy Institute,Family Budget Calculator,http://www.epi.org/resources/budget/(last viewed May 31,2016). 5 Id. 6 National Employment Law Project,Occupational Wage Declines Since the Great Recession(Sept.2015), available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/Occupational-Wage-Declines-Since-the-Great- Recession.pdf. Id. 8 National Employment Law Project,An Unbalanced Recovery: Real Wage and Job Growth Trends(Aug. 2014),available at https://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/2015/03/Unbalanced-Recovery-Real-Wage-Job- Growth-Trends-August-2014.pdf. 9 National Employment Law Project,Fight for$15 Impact Report: Raises for 17 Million Workers, 10 Million Going to$15 (Apr.2016),available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/NELP-Fact-Sheet-Fight-for-15- Impact-Report.pdf. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 Raise the Minimum Wage,$15 Laws&Current Campaigns,http://raisetheminimumwage.org/pages/15- Laws-Current-Campaigns(last viewed May 26,2016). 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 Hart Research,Support for a Federal Minimum Wage of$12.50 or above(Jan.2015),available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/2015/03/Minimum-Wage-Poll-Memo-Jan-2015.pdf. 17 Victoria Research,Results of National Poll of Workers Paid Less than$15 Per Hour(Oct.2015),available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/Low-Wage-Worker-Survey-Memo-October-2015.pdf. 18 Id. 19 Michael Reich et al(eds.),University of California Press,When Mandates Work: Raising Labor Standards at the Local Level(2014),available at http://irle.berkeley.edu/publications/when-mandates-work/. 20 Arindrajit Dube,Minimum Wages and the Distribution of Family Incomes(Dec.2013)at 31,available at https://dl.dropboxusercontentcom/u/15038936/Dube_MinimumWagesFamilylncomes.pdf("I find robust evidence that minimum wages tend to reduce the incidence of poverty,and also proportions with incomes under one-half or three-quarters of the poverty line"). 21 William Copeland&Elizabeth J.Costello,Am.Econ.J.Appl.Econ., Parents'Incomes and Children's Outcomes:A Quasi-Experiment(Jan.2010)at 1. 8 22 Rajiv Bhatia,Human Impact Partners,Health Impacts of Raising California's Minimum Wage(May 2014)at 3,available at http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Documents/PDF/2014/SB935_HealthAnalysis.pdf. 23 Id. 24 id. 25 Lisa Dodson&Randy Albelda,Center for Social Policy,Univ.of Mass.,Boston,How Youth Are Put at Risk by Parents'Low-Wage Jobs(Fall 2012)at 9-13. 26 Editorial Board,"Raise the Minimum Wage," Bloomberg View(Apr. 18,2012),available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-16/u-s-minimum-wage-lower-than-in-lbj-era-needs-a- raise.html. 27 Arindrajit Dube et al,The Review of Economics and Statistics,Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties(Nov.2010)at 92(4): 945-964. A summary of the study prepared by NELP is available at http://nelp.3cdn.net/98b449fce61fca7d43_j1m6iizwd.pdf, 28 Similar,sophisticated new research has also focused in particular on teen workers—a very small segment of the low-wage workforce affected by minimum wage increases,but one that is presumed to be especially vulnerable to displacement because of their lack of job tenure and experience. However,the research has similarly found no evidence that minimum wage increases in the U.S.in recent years have had any adverse effect on teen employment. See Sylvia Allegretto et al,Industrial Relations,Do Minimum Wages Reduce Teen Employment?(Apr.2011)at vol.50,no.2. A NELP Summary is available at http://nelp.3cdn.net/eb5df32f3af67ae91b_65m6iv7eb.pdf, 29 Hristos Doucouliagos&T.D.Stanley,British J.of Indus.Relations,Publication Selection Bias in Minimum- Wage Research?A Meta-Regression Analysis(May 2009)at Vol.47,Iss.2. 38 Paul Wolfson&Dale Belman,Upjohn Inst.for Employ.Res.,What Does the Minimum Wage Do?(2014). 31 Center for Economic&Policy Research,2014 Job Creation Faster in States that Raised the Minimum Wage (June 2014),available at http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/cepr-blog/2014-job-creation-in-states-that- raised-the-minimum-wage, 32 Michael Reich et al,Univ.of Calif.-Berkeley,The Economic Effects of a Citywide Minimum Wage(2007), available at http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/cwed/wp/economicimpacts_07.pdf, 33 Michael Reich et al(eds.),Univ.of Calif.Press,"When Mandates Work: Raising Labor Standards at the Local Level,"(2014)at 31,available at http://irle.berkeley.edu/publications/when-mandates-work/. See also Susan Berfield,San Francisco's Higher Minimum Wage Hasn't Hurt the Economy, BloombergBusiness(Jan. 2014),available at http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-22/san-franciscos-higher-minimum- wage-hasnt-hurt-the-economy; Carolyn Lochhead,S.F.praised as model for U.S.on increasing minimum wage,Jan.28,2014,SF Gate,available at http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/S-F-praised-as-model-for-U- S-on-increasing-5183378.php. 34 Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of New Mexico, Measuring the Employment Impacts of the Living Wage Ordinance in Santa Fe,New Mexico(June 2006),available at http://bber.unm.edu/pubs/EmploymentLivingWageAnalysis.pdf, 35 John Schmitt&David Rosnick,Center for Econ.&Policy Research,The Wage and Employment Impact of Minimum-Wage Laws in Three Cities (Mar.2011)at 1,available at http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/min-wage-2011-03.pdf. For a helpful overview of this literature on the impact of city minimum wages,see Michael Reich et al,Local Minimum Wage Laws: Impacts on Workers,Families and Businesses: Report prepared for the Seattle Income Inequality Advisory Committee (Mar.2014)at 17-19,available at http://murray.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/UC-Berkeley- I IAC-Report-3-20-2014.pdf. 36Eric Morath,What Happened to Fast-Food Workers When San Jose Raised the Minimum Wage?,Apr.9, 2015, Wall Street Journal,available at http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2014/04/09/what-happened-to-fast- food-workers-when-san-jose-raised-the-minimum-wage/. 37 Paul Davidson,In San Jose,higher minimum wage pays benefits,Jun. 14,2015,USA Today,available at http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/06/14/minimum-wage-san-jose/9968679/. 38 Amy Martinez,$15 wage floor slowly takes hold in SeaTac,Jun.3,2014, The Seattle Times,available at http://seattl etimes.com/html/localnews/2022905775_seatacproplxml.html. 39 Dana Milbank,"Raising the minimum wage without raising havoc,"Sept.5,2014, The Washington Post, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-no-calamity-yet-as-seatac-wash- adjusts-to-15-minimum-wage/2014/09/05/d12ba922-3503-11e4-9e92-0899b306bbea_story.html. 9 4°Jeanine Stewart,Apocalypse Not:$15 and the cuts that never came,Oct. 23,2015,Puget Sound Business Journal,available at http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/print-edition/2015/10/23/apocolypse-not-15- and-the-cuts-that-never-ca me.html. 41 Blanca Torres,A year in,'the sky is not falling'from Seattle's minimum-wage hike,Mar.31,2016,The Seattle Times,available at http://www.seattletimes.com/business/economy/a-year-in-the-sky-is-not-falling- from-seattles-minimum-wage-hike/. 42 Coral Garnick,Seattle jobless rate hits 8-year low in August,Sept.16,2015, The Seattle Times,available at http://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/state-jobless-rate-stays-steady-at-53-percent-in- august/. 43 National Employment Law Project,The Case for Eliminating the Tipped Minimum Wage in Washington,D.C. (May 2016),available at http://nelp.org/content/uploads/Report-Case-Eliminating-Tipped-Minimum-Wage- Washington-DC.pdf. "Democratic staff of the U.S.House Committee on Education and the Workforce,The Low-Wage Dragon Our Economy:Wal-Mart's low wages and their effect on taxpayers and economic growth (May 2013),available at http://democrats-edworkforce.house.gov/imo/media/doc/WalMartReport-May2013.pdf. 45 Sylvia Allegretto et al,Fast Food,Poverty Wages:The Public Cost of Low-Wage Jobs in the Fast-Food Industry(Oct.2013),available at http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/publiccosts/fast_food_poverty_wages.pdf 46 National Employment Law Project,Super-sizing Public Costs: How Low Wages at Top Fast-Food Chains Leave Taxpayers Footing the Bill(Oct.2013),available at http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/2015/03/NELP-Super-Sizing-Public-Costs-Fast-Food-Report.pdf. 10 t y (I) Dw 14 %_ v Cc'E I ■ a v o 41=1 � o � c 4>. U CD .- N Z a) CD a I-- O a C C C o • 0 x o 0 v) 0 +- 4) • -4- 0 2 CM U -0 C N O N L " o D U) (I) O om- ° U � CD c Q - O C 0 N 0) No O sai Q CO .U) L o O 0 a) E .- '0 3 c� C5 0 U D _0 D f 8 U) •E E o 0 0 o �- E Q L_ o, •E o r a) CD ° o U) o o -o I O N 1 0 j- L L o O 00 _c C 0 CD o ,- N N I— vi _C O : a) >- E. ia N N O O ', - °O E O C O ° U D r C U O N 0 d9- += � O - O .7) _ C O O O 4) - 4--. . . E ° C •O O O °U _o -0 .— _ U •- E n O O v) 92 O C No Q v) O -+-- d9- 0 CQ Cr 4- 0 E O N x O N r V "' O O C 0 o O E •o > -o O o _c O o C °' o 0 N ? 3 O O O E � O O E U 0 C >- 0 v �C E -0 O CD � v - a) 0 To N O N - N Q O += - -F .. O O 1` MMW^^ W L ! i o 1-1 .5 M N N C J IA.i C i I N VI X100 M -I M j r _ c o O cr-. o { Q ii}I 1 O a. E . V .5 c� OO Ti J N NI i0 V , t 4.3.ai a) H f- o -4- U - , 0�0 lz 1 a) c esl = . . •. i unI a a :It4 U •� f 0 J E ; b . v n tin v 01 o CO a 0) No Wm W L c to 0 ^ I O aA C > N N N E 0 a) _c J O H o U c 0 O O ;c r' _ Tr N O m C •_ _ �_ O Vu c ° ^ 1 O .' < stn. O O L L C 2 3 O a 0 c I _C •— co -4 oO E E _�/� = c . = O O in- in- L ' ' 0 L < r >. a) a) V _ ✓ C rri oo VI 0) a) Q N U 0 I I N N a) oy ' V) cn }-- O — —•E in G Q ' ,4 N1 4) o a Q) O ^ N O -0 CI 0) N •c 1 c G) E D 0 T5 U .0 CO v) CO C — a. co . O � 1--) - O u... -, ..._ .b7,_. No 64— O ia) 0) •_ `O .0 0 c -� }' N 0 D 0 O co d' = , �- c l• E o '"~ lo' ,(1)._ O , O O T E Elmo -�- o • C+-- tf . .E O �- O ,, , u o U E E_1____ fi -4- T O 0 0 C Lo Lo Q cn O •� O 7,5 a• O Q N o 7 >_1:12 4c( § a) 2 (T U O 0 C > .c * .4=C .O O •— � o 0) E ._ O �„ O >N O D O _C 0 � — -+- * E (i) O "' , o •— o 0 0 0 o 2 'U >% U v) � o . O c � i X cn 0 •... E _sz 0) LI) 7 2 ( -) '- 0 00 o _ ° 3 D E O a) 2 ° Q cr -0 a) _ ° D O o — 4=E o f E a) C 2 Q (, � .CC E0 `� "' O o U a)E 2 e - E E� a) c O O O o "' 0) 0 4) > C 0 v, O E a) 0 o a) -) o �o •° ra) c � c _ C O O Q O '\ °> '0 C ° _ O - cN a) e 0 -c o --0 u 8) C il ° - 'LJ 3 o Q \\ I\1\ II il ti c c G c 0 li I. I 0 fa m g I'E op m 1 i. 1 * -"i 0 .--a I 1_ \ Xo 1 \ I ! I- ,w, .47, Cr z3 a: r4 i $ o I A 4 1 i 14 1 i 1 i■ 'I \I\ AG i A 'I I i a. ., ri a LA yi a a El a PI a. 6 0 ,--.R A 1 I '0 a g ii ft- g gio mil 4' 16 (6 cr d ci; cr; 461 - — t ! 5 1 nr 1 .i r, ,.. ,.. ail w a to . t IQ nr , ., 4 0 3SRPRRCI9- itg `, , • n • r r a a a . T M Ms CO !A 4 et 441. M *! 2 o (0CECO 0) .:. RilgitikersIgl & ag. 4 1 C N • CO-- al & A ' ' cligit ,. ...., .... , _ y�R� .✓ F 1ti .w Pf 14 Pi 4%. St Ps -g. , CIS 3 Ws i igi is E 8 vle. ai ... .. , .- Nwriagg 0 g g . z N L() ) L) 0) C tom- O O r U ."4 Ems — 0 , 000 0 > o .- Q F-7-7, _c 0 3QC 04- 0 `" 0) 0 2 O O , � � .r -+- O) O C Qr ,U 0 >-.U .O E .O) gip 0 ±- - O i 00 0 < 0 00 at ..0 -I- D0E c _ > > � � O .0 _c -0 4) 0 O � .- 0C 30r •— o > o c -�- •_ 70 03 = (D .°' o > o = 3c ' > 000 � o Q•� Q O aDa QX0 * C 0 D 0 O _o � Og > E o c o � > ,UO 0 •- 04- ON 0 � N ,_ o 3C -o tO of > 0 0 0 4- o � 03 O o Eo >- 0) , _c) N (1), 01 ,r= v) o � � o � }- _ � 0c -0 0c0 t0) o0O o = 0U >--c -0 ;cfsr) (2 < _0 a) (-5 --2 C 'a- -.4. _ >- .a) a) . -T)- DO o0 � 0 � 0XQ . a coO)•_ � � 0 _C 0 _ 000 (D & V2 — :4=. Q _00 .= (I) 0 ' 00 = 0 ( 52 O00 DQ •C -EDOO 3 2 aD o O) o 4) O c ]' L ul O o O E OE > a)' o 0 (1) o Oo • , �O � E L O c O O O oa 4- V)b .� = DLO oo P -0 -0 oE LioC5 .E: c c E>% „ v) 0 Co D0) ' CC) I o0c .- _C � oo O o cn ~ ' N � .0 E vi _C O O — , a) "4- (N E a ov .> � o oN � L � 0 o 0 v) O 4) •— 4� 4) = O U 73 > E 7' E O L O 0 0 N _O '7) H D � 0 L Cr) = O L _c 0) -,- o u .(1) .a. . O .O O D O O O R _ mot: O .(i > — = O — O O O a O N D C O C a O > , D O c o o a 2 . ._ 0 D Q) O U) 0 O O j > 0 Q 0 0 O Q) O O � � O 0 O (r)� _C 0) 0 'c c c — .0 O O O 0 _O 0 0= 0 c c D 0 0 O O 4 U O ,� nil - 4� W 2 -0 is) E — — 0 V 0 O CO o C U _ a Qv c >. ° � 3 a-) E LD1 cg . •a R 0 75 0 b' . 0 v) T) - P a � a) .0 c O 17) O 2 tj 0 O _a 0 =‘,) c D 1 7) .C-2_ O 0 0 U p p 0 E a) ti) U E _c 7 -CD 3 � a .� ,_ a 0 - a 0( 1 o a � • _ O U 0 0) o 0) 0 p ,UN N a) N p 0 a � o 0 0 U "' 3 ``- O �° - 3 N o) 8 8 c� 0 0 c E f E 0 � E o ,� � C EE •4=D CO T . - 0 -S 0 D E ' o E .(f-) -3 o> E o E E E 'E v) -�- r D 4- o N o S (3) 0(1) o� 6 Ed 0 L D O_ci P_ -0 >. .0 a .1,,, 0 � � > o i ° o C `NI , D Q D E U O 0 >' . D > E -O -0 3 6 0 S 0 6 rp •E ,4), 0 E 1((j)' � 3o E oo � 3 .� - 30 � 0 F- rD Q CO ° _8 �_ a) ?I-) k- N p > O O O • (N 0 CO -> � � � 0 � D• " 0 0 o o 0 o f o O 0) 2 O p Q 0 = -4,5 E D 0 o cn • E a ' E Q o N 0 10 -0 o C D U D ID U) . a) o o O - *- U O Q) 0 N O E � � U o- � � C3 O • 3 Q Q p N c .E E ,_ c, O a E . ,_ (7, 0) i o O) D 0 .E O � c O e .E E -0 0 E E o 0 0 a 0 0 _ N •C g- - �- > N C Q U C D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 D N>- a * E ,_ •- v) — _Q .-- O r O 0) O i .. = ✓ � 0 of_ _ av D 2oC 3 -0c' _Q 0c'; C >, -° ° E ' -o U o > 00 Eco � 'a) ° Q E tp 61)-0 0 c Q 4- 0 o 0 , O 3 :'-- o o - o 0 3 U QE ' a) c3 eE .- 0 L- .- (i) 0 5 0• O 0 O 5 i 'c" 46 0 N 4_0 0 _N co O {:Pt. N D N C C C 0 - 0 o � � O 4 cn CE) v. .-c D O Lo NI- c 0 ✓ 6- - _c .0 4_ v) c 0 u 0 p 0) o X U 0> 0 D :Eovl Co O V- 0 0coo NO c 4 . 4) N O -� O (NA L_ (D CN 3 ..0 _ _O W C y 0 C >. L 0 en N'- C= O)-O C 0.0 aj Vj -° y 3•o c .T, C 0 C U 0 O L u U Z 0 a 0 m W U L m i)0.- co C u O L U O C 0 C M O O._ N m 0 'O d '>'V ao E y F-N p a..L.+N 4 cc) .0 d O Q N Z Q v' U U Q7 y L C C c U m — N,= ° 0aN m� >LC3 > G mOmV v yE >o mmc 3._ oo m Een duam•° L aNNy °; oo) co o �t00� CN'� Eaiv ° �E Ems' oCn 0 ammy MLLE YCmm c o °) E °v N Vo c°iF ~au°.c ZcooEcm °y - C- comaoo G 6 c:' cum -o-- . UE ° =° $Z O C ,0 C O N Z ° E a o�°� =N E n v O co c d Q C eon j L Y 2.E N N c O. L O cp 0 C(j L M Z Q o m `^ 0 ell n C W O N n 0 N p co " 0 E•-� F-r....,. OQUyLU a. >crj U `7 Uy T N > a_ Z C = tots U C m O 0•�'.. Off, ar �_+ 'c y J >Ct Lm-.-;O Di_j