The URL can be used to link to this page

Agreement with Desman, Inc. © I6-2.9LI ZS AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND DESMAN, INC. FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2016-124-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2016-29425 1 A TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLES ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 8 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 15 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 16 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 17 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 18 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 19 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 19 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 21 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 21 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 22 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 22 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 23 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 24 SCHEDULES SCHEDULE A— SCOPE OF SERVICES/CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER 28 SCHEDULE B— CONSULTANT COMPENSATION 29 SCHEDULE C— HOURLY BILLING RATE SQUEDULE 30 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A— RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMO 31 ATTACHMENT B— REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 32 ATTACHMENT C—CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO RFQ - - 33 2 to AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND DESMAN, INC. • FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2016-124-KB This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Desman, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal office at 49 West 37th Street, 5th Floor, New York, New York, 10018; and having local offices at 2881 East Oakland Park Boulevard, Ft. Lauderdale, Fl. 33306 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). W ITNESS ET H: WHEREAS, the RFQ No. 2016-124-KB (the "RFQ") was issued on April 20, 2016; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2016, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2016- 1 29425, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with DESMAN, INC., and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained,•agree as follows: • - • • ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. 3 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid"shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as specified by the City in a Consultant Service Order for any particular Project. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Design/Builder pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Design/Builder has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Design/Builder's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. 4 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. Consultant will serve as the "Design Criteria Professional" for the Project, and as such, shall be responsible for performing, or causing to be performed, all Services in connection with the preparation of the Design Criteria Package for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to the Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The following Subconsultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: • Lansing Melbourne Group, LLC— Construction Administration • Built Form, LLC—Architect • Brooks + Scarpa Architects—Architects • Bermello Ajamil & Partners Inc. —Architects/Landscape Architecture • Draper &Associates— Scheduling • Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. — Civil, Environmental & Geotechnical Engineer • Pulice Land Surveyors Inc. - Land Survey • Louis J. Aguirre &Associates, P.A. — MEP • Straticon LLC- Cost Estimating CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean any work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which may be required of Consultant for any Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. 5 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Design/Builder for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general Design/Builder, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction Design/Builder selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. DESIGN/BUILDER: "Design/Builder" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City pursuant to Florida Statute 287.055, to complete the design for the Project as the architect/engineer of record and construct the Project pursuant to the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-Oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract, pursuant to Florida Statute 287.055. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the Project(s) identified in this Agreement or in any Consultant Service Order. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Design/Builder has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Design/Builder's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable 6 casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Design/Builder and its sub- Design/Builders, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project' shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Scope of Services set forth in any Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services/Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation Schedule C— Hourly Billing Rate Schedule 7 SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Design/Builder in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Design/Builder's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as more particularly described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. Consultant shall have no entitlement to perform (or be compensated for) the Services corresponding with any task under this Agreement, unless such task is authorized by a Consultant Service Order. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and 8 r represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the DCP contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the DCP shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if the design is further developed and constructed as contemplated by the DCP, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall review any value engineering proposals submitted by the Design/Builder, and shall provide recommendations regarding the Construction Documents prepared by the Design/Builder to ensure, among other things, that the Construction Documents are consistent with the DCP. Consultant shall also, as part of the Basic Services, evaluate and provide the City with recommendations concerning Design/Builder's progress with Project construction consistent with the DCP. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work and Services performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the DCP or other Services provided by Consultant, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the DCP or other Services provided by Consultant. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or all Services authorized under Consultant Service Orders are completed and accepted, whichever is later. Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Scope of Services, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for the Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 9 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Design/Builder, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement and any Consultant Service Order in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement any Consultant Service Orders (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's deficient Services, breaches of this Agreement, or negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Services, which damages may include the costs incurred by the City with respect to replacement or repair of any defective or non-conforming construction Work until (i) twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, or (ii) the applicable statute of limitations period, whichever is later. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 10 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Sservices and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, Design/Builder, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be . authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent 11 of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and any Consultant Service Orders, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks under a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shalt obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be 12 amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship - between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause.for, any, increase in compensation to the Consultant for. payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 13 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve . any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer. shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 14 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION.COST. 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, set forth in the Consultant Service Order for any particular Project. Consultant shall prepare the DCP for the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall prepare or modify the DCP for the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the DCP, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in 15 the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services) without any further liability to the City. 4.3. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of execution of the applicable Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the 16 performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. v. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's"Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in 17 proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly billing rates set forth in Schedule "C,"attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount set forth in Schedule B or in the applicable Consultant Service Order. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City Manager, at his sole discretion, may consider an adjustment to the hourly rates set forth in Schedule C. Any such adjustments, if any, shall be based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, provided, however, that in no event shall any annual increase exceed three percent (3%). In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Design/Builder. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize.any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 "Notices"), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and 18 accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays 19 the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability_to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by 20 the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim. Consultant shall notify the Project Administrator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability policy. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, 21 including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Design/Builder, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. • ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an 22 alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: Capital Improvement Projects Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: David Martinez All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: DESMAN, Inc. 49 West 37th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY. 10018 Attn: Christian Luz With a copy to: Timothy Tracy, Principal-in-Charge Executive Vice President DESMAN, Inc. 49 West 37th Street Fifth Floor New York, NY 10018-6216 Office: 212.686.5360 ttracv(a�desman.com and Christian Luz, Project Manager DESMAN, Inc. 2881 E. Oakland Park Boulevard, Suite 209 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306 Office: 954.315.1797 Cell: 305.900.8199 cluzdesman.com 23 All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a Design/Builder, supplier, Sub-Design/Builder, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 24 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or Design/Builder who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its.Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of 25 such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI B C IN /,' : l '' W r ',�7 , ,....CITY VA 401,4%. � ''�i' Q ,�' N YR ,..- / Attest 1....1 so R f'nTcF D: r4 I ‘ 17-',/,........ egri ; ......._INV • /Y, "' ''-::,,,, 71f S7!l!re/Se - ary Si•atu're/Pr- •■V't A7ii✓r ? 1 ' Print Name Print Na e APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION 1.1i.,_7.--,01 opCity Attorney Rpif Date 27 SCHEDULE A— SCOPE OF SERVICES/CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES Service Order No._for Design Criteria Professional Consultant Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated - , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount $ of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Administrator Date Assistant Director Date Consultant. - Date Director Date 28 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 29 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL Project Principal $200.00 Project Manager $174.00 Senior Engineer/Planner/Architect $154.00 Engineer/Planner/Architect $120.00 Designer $ 95.00 CAD Technician $ 75.00 Threshold Inspector $100.00 Structural Special Inspector $ 95.00 Inspector (Construction) $ 75.00 Clerical/Administrative $ 55.00 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $163.00 Surveyor $120.00 Surveyor Support Staff $ 80.00 Cost Estimator $ 85.00 30 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 31 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-29425 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF FIRMS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2016-124-KB FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DESMAN, INC., • AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH DESMAN INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BEA ARCHITECTS, INC., AS THE SECOND HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT, UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2016-124-KB (the "RFQ") was issued on April 20, 2016, with an opening date of May 20, 2016; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on May 3, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City received a total of two (2) proposals; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2016, via Letter to Commission (LTC) 212-2016, and on May 23, 2016, via LTC No. 224-2016, the City Manager appointed the following individuals to serve on the Evaluation Committee ("Committee") or as an alternate as available: • Monica Beltran, Assistant Director, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach; • Sabrina Baglieri, Senior Capital Projects Coordinator;..Capital Improvement Program, City of Miami Beach; • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach; • Rocio Alba, Administrative Services Manager, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach; and • Roberto Rodriguez, Capital Projects Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program, City of Miami Beach; • Michael Belush, Planning and Zoning Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach; • James Murphy, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on May 26, 2016 to consider the proposals received; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows: DESMAN Inc. and BEA Architects, Inc.; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked proposer, DESMAN Inc.; further, should negotiations fail, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations with the second highest ranked proposer, BEA Architects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2016-124-KB (the RFQ), Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with DESMAN Inc. as the top ranked proposer; further, should the Administration not be successful in negotiating an agreement with DESMAN Inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with BEA Architects, Inc. as the second highest ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this I day of Jhn( 2016. Philip L- ne,, ayor' ATTEST: / / CO 13 B 11+4 . Ra ael E. Granado, City CI- \� \ ' •�Q . es•—..� r;* ':INCORP ORATED`- A (0 T:WGENDAt20161.June\Procurement1R:FQ 01,6-12•=•B .Dtr `-"Bro•-ssional Services for Mixed Use Parking Garages\RFQ-2016-124-KB-DCP Prdfis4s1 eked-Vsp.P/ark arages-Resolution final.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION 40%• ir • • ey , ;r Date COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2016-124-KB FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN ' CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES Key Intended Outcome Supported: - Maximize The Miami Beach Brand As A World Class Destination. Supporting Data(Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc: N/A Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration desires to select a design criteria professional to develop design criteria packages, as required by Section 287.055, Florida Statutes,for the issuance of design-build projects to develop parking garages which may include the following locations.The City may add or remove sites from the list below as deemed necessary. 1. Police Station/12th Street Garage(Garage 2) 2. Collins/13th Street(Parking Lot 16) 3. Washington/10th Street(Parking Lot 13) 4. 2660 Collins Ave(Parking Lot 55) 5. 930 Washington Ave(Parking Lot12) 6. Terranova 830 W 42nd St(Parking Lot 62) 7. 1623 West Ave(Parking Lot 23) 8. 1671 West Ave(Parking Lot 24) 9. Fire Station 1 /Parking Garage at Flamingo Park 10. Collins Park Garage To select a qualified design criteria firm, on April 13, 2016, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)No. RFQ 2016-124-KB for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages. On April 20,2016,the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on May 3, 2016. RFQ responses were due and received on May 20, 2016. The City received proposals from the following firms: BEA Architects, Inc. and DESMAN Inc. The Evaluation Committee convened on May 26,2016 to consider proposals received.The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process,the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked proposer, DESMAN, Inc.; and, should negotiations fail, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the second highest ranked proposer, BEA Architects, Inc.; further, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with the successful firm. RECOMMENDATION ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: Source Amount Account of 1 The cost of the related services, determined upon successful Funds: negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. OBPI Total Financial Impact Summary: City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Alex Denis, David Martinez Sign-Offs: Dep rt ent D' ector Assis pt City Manager City M- . !er DM ) AD EC / MT JLM T:IAGENDA12016 une\Ptocurem nt1RFQ 2016-124-KB DCP Professional Services for Mixed Use Parking Garages\RFQ-2016- • -DCP Professional Mixed Use Parking Garages-Summary.doc MIAMIBEACH AGENDA I - k DATE G-Y- 1L MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beoch, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSI MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of e City Co mission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager • DATE: June 8, 2016 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR ND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPT G THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2016- 124-KB FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Maximize The Miami Beach Brand As A World Class Destination. FUNDING The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. BACKGROUND The Administration desires to select a design criteria professional to develop design criteria packages, as required by Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, for the issuance of design-build projects to develop parking garages which may include the following locations. The City may add or remove sites from the list below as deemed necessary. 1. Police Station/12th Street Garage (Garage 2) 2. Collins/13th Street(Parking Lot 16) 3. Washington/10th Street (Parking Lot 13) 4. 2660 Collins Ave (Parking Lot 55) 5. 930 Washington Ave (Parking Lot12) 6. Terranova 830 W 42nd St (Parking Lot 62) 7. 1623 West Ave (Parking Lot 23) 8. 1671 West Ave (Parking Lot 24) 9. Fire Station 1 / Parking Garage at Flamingo Park 10. Collins Park Garage The projects encompass professional architectural/engineering consulting services to furnish sufficient information to permit Design-Build firms to prepare a bid or a response to the City's request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated Design-Build contract. The Design Criteria Package must at a minimum specify performance-based criteria for the public construction project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, storm water retention and disposal, plus parking, retail spaces, housing requirements applicable to the project. Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2016-124-KB, for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages June 8, 2016 Page 2 Proposals were requested from professional consulting architectural/engineering firms which have proven experience in the preparation of Design Criteria Package for Parking Garage with other facilities such as retail spaces, housing and public spaces. The successful firm must have the financial resources and technical expertise to provide the services requested in this RFQ and prepare the associated contract documents. RFQ PROCESS On April 13, 2016, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. RFQ 2016-124-KB for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages. On April 20, 2016, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on May 3, 2016. RFQ responses were due and received on May 20, 2016. The City received a total of two (2) proposals. The City received proposals from the following firms: BEA Architects, Inc. and DESMAN Inc. On May 17, 2016, the City Manager, via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 212-2016, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), consisting of the following individuals: • Monica Beltran, Assistant Director, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach • Sabrina Baglieri, Senior Capital Projects Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program, City of Miami Beach • Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach The City Manager also considered the following individuals as alternates: • Rocio Alba, Administrative Services Manager, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach • Roberto Rodriguez, Capital Projects Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program, City of Miami Beach However, Deborah Tackett, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department, was unable to participate as an evaluation committee member. As such, via LTC No. 224-2016 the City Manager appointed the following individuals to serve on the Evaluation Committee or as an alternate as available: • Michael Belush, Planning and Zoning Manager, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • James Murphy, Principal Planner, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach The Evaluation Committee convened on May 26, 2016 to consider proposals received. Ms. Monica Beltran and Ms. Deborah Tackett were unable to attend and therefore Ms. Rocio Alba and Mr. Michael Belush participated as alternates. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in the table below. Request For Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2016-124-KB,for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages June 8,2016 Page 3 EVALUATION COMMITTEE Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2016-124-KB,for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria LOW Professional Services for Mixed-Use Sabrina Michael AGGREGATE Parking Garages Baglieri Ranking Rocio Alba Ranking Belush Ranking TOTALS Rank DESMAN Inc. 103 1 95 1 98 1 3 1 _ BEA Architects 90 2 75 2 85 2 6 2 CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked proposer, DESMAN, Inc.; and, should negotiations fail, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the second highest ranked proposer, BEA Architects, Inc.; further, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with the successful firm. JLM/MT/EC/DM/AD T:\AGENDA\2016\June\Procurement\RFQ 2016-124-KB DCP Professional Services for Mixed Use Parking Garages\RFQ-2016- 124-KB-DCP Professional Mixed Use Parking Garages-Memo.doc • - -- -,ATTACHMENT.B `REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) , ✓ - .,.�. I:L - , -� t ,• 'jam � - - ac - - v- 4 ' L i �• - r • 32s r MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES May 11, 2016 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Pre-Submittal Meeting Sign In Sheet II. MODIFICATIONS. 1. APPENDIX C: Minimum Requirements & Specifications, Subsection C2 Statement of Work Required has been revised as follows: * * * The following is a list of proposed Parking Garages which may require Design Criteria Professional Services. The City may add or remove sites from the list below as deemed necessary. 1. Police Station/12th Street Garage (Garage 2) 2. Collins/13th Street(Parking Lot 16) 3. Washington/10th Street(Parking Lot 13) 4. 2660 Collins Ave (Parking Lot 55) 5. 930 Wash Ave (Parking Lot12) 6. Terranova 830 W 42nd St (Parking Lot 62) 7. 1623 West Ave (Parking Lot 23) 8. 1671 West Ave (Parking Lot 24) 9. Fire Station 1 / Parking Garage at Flamingo Park 10. Collins Park Garage III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS AT THE PRE-BID MEETING AND VIA EMAIL. Q1: What would be the funding source of the projects? Is it all public money? Al: City Funds will be used for Projects to be developed under this RFQ. Q2: Does the City know which of the proposed sites will have workforce/affordable housing? A2: It is the intention of the City to accommodate for Workforce/Affordable housing in all Parking Garages structures where possible. All parking structures are to be designed to allow for conversion to workforce/affordable housing in the future. Q3: Will the mixed use components of the projects (retail/housing) need to be LEED 1 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES certified? A3: Yes. Q4: Of the nine (9) sites is it possible that more than one(1)will get built? A4: Yes. Q5: Will one firm be selected for all sites or several firms? A5: See Section 0200 Instructions to Respondents and General Conditions, subsection 19 Determination of Award. Typically the City enters into negotiations with the top ranked proposer; should negotiations not be successful the City enters into negotiations with the second highest ranked 1 proposer; and should negotiations not be successful the City enters into negotiations with the third highest ranked proposer and so on. However, the City reserves the award rights afforded in the RFQ. Q6: Is there a budget per site? A6: At this time these are the Project Budget for: Police Station/12th Street Garage$1,491,000 Collins Ave/13th Street(Parking Lot 16) $12,870,000 Washington Ave/10th Street(Parking Lot 13) $5,298,000 Collins Park Parking Garage $27,000,000 Q7: Are there any minority goals? A7: No DBE & SBE requirement has been established. However, proposing firm should submit evidence of Proposer's intent to utilize Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Firms. Accepted DBE certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. Q8: Will it be possible for you to share the sign-in sheet of the pre-bid meeting? A8: Attached as Exhibit A. Q9: The RFQ states that the Prime Proposer shall be certified as "Architect" or "Architect Business" or hold a "Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. Can a licensed engineering firm be the Prime Proposer? A9: Yes, please refer to Appendix C; subsection C1 No. 2 of the RFQ. Q10: The RFQ states that the Design Criteria Professional who is selected is not eligible to render services under a Design Build contract executed pursuant to the Design Criteria Package. Does that include all members of the Design Criteria Professional team or just the Prime Proposer? A10: This includes all members of the team. Q10: Is this project planned in addition or a replacement to the Collins Park Place garage? 2 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES A10: Please refer to Modification 1 above. Q10: Will this project require a LEED certification? A10: See response to Q3 above. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(c�miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sin erely, — ,� Ale , D- is Pro.-4 rement Director 3 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES EXHIBIT A MIAMIBEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: MAY 3, 2016 TITLE: RFQ 2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES NAME COMPANY NAME - PHONE# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Kristy Bada Contracting Officer II - Procurement 305-673-7490 kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov °font' Vey1 ,sue 11 eo voll Coo Ptou ei I l C.vil taS Oyu) PcuL\ Ire,V ! e ° C� yi FAY CAAJ . l MIAMIBEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: MAY 3, 2016 TITLE: RFQ 2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES NAME : COMPANY NAME: PHONE# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS • • A--vii of Ku oit tl o Ka v' HP Coo sw It-'nis To c_ • 30--St1G•2gq \J tiPcoog I.(f°/11-6l ►)G e etn- C-11;ok6 `let Trcat CtvI I En`,y nm + eercri. ° f) ?fl\S�' oso,f_,.0 Gq-S°Ifl -gi5i\v LAZ I \.,,,, c-- ,\.-.,-1,„\-__ �r\\ce.:-A,:&. j_u��\',:a>�e 8G-3 .% ,,A J2c 4 ? °° - �- rA cm-4- 6ag ff P- --/ W`C 1 TAN 17(*- tg NI dA t @ Fi I (_oM 4 ' 7O' t *114, i f \a r�S Be�1 .0-ccht-tec S S v _� E teaCOY fe 1 in . ,1 ,Corf uI •2_(i 1 I 0 Je`(VYiI;G et `IBC Fmi 11 ee ,,,3 ki P \le Ck ve 3 uaE'Vc q - beirflUCte -etc-etA,T 6er 2_.6 c -6 SS.- R o€2 T O pop izt6v C`4 7 OF 1*-4 te4P-1% •UCa,c-L (3os (r..7 3-loa0 CAF ITAL. ' kt-Trovehtil\ 'io.{ec- • (Irk Ci: ,1,11 0 ; ,&,',e,' .()A, 601 6 73.-4-q : `v, ! (l"�r f7• ,;�,'.�,)1aa ftv C:��. i �' 2 1 1 I 1 MIMAIBEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: MAY 3, 2016 TITLE: RFQ 2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS 441-1/ pp Atti % t 06 73 .1071 641041/4 .1,4-6Ca-Adketaftwboda.r . CcoAcO tA oi . 6D7r.14aton.cam, 2.1PIL133(4, 3 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES April 20,2016 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. REVISIONS. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE. The tentative schedule for this solicitation has been revised as follows: Solicitation Issued April 20, 2016 Pre-Submittal Meeting May 10, 2016 at 2:00PM May 3, 2016 at 10:00AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions May 27, 2016 at 5:00PM May 10, 2016 at 5:00PM Responses Due Juno 6, 2016 at 3:00PM May 20, 2016 at 3:00PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval TBD Authorizing Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.qov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada @miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. Sin-.-r- y, oe Alex Denis Procur ent Director I ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2016-124-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ) ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MIXED-USE PARKING GARAGES 2016-124-KB • RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: APRIL 20, 2016 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: JUNE 6, 2016 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMI BEACH KRISTY BADA, CONTRACTING OFFICER II PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7000 x6218 I www.miamibeachfl.gov OP MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 31 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 34 RFQ 2016-124-KB 2 AA I AMI BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the "City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently,the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The Purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to qualify a Proposer for Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages. Additionally, the terms "FIRM", "PROPOSER", "CONSULTANT," "PRIME PROPOSER," "CONTRACTOR," are used interchangeably and shall refer to the firm that will contract with the City for the performance consultant services and work for the project. Scope of Services is pursuant to Appendix C, Section C-2., of this RFQ. The City seeks Proposals from professional consulting architectural/engineering firms which have proven experience in the preparation of Design Criteria Package for Parking Garage with other facilities such as retail spaces, housing and public spaces. The successful firm must have the financial resources and technical expertise to provide the services requested in this RFQ and prepare the associated contract documents. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued April 20, 2016 Pre-Submittal Meeting May 10, 2016 at 2:00PM Deadline for Receipt of Questions May 27, 2016 at 5:00PM Responses Due June 6, 2016 at 3:00PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval RFQ 2016-124-KB 3 a AMAMI BEACH 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kris Bada 305-673-7490 x6218 kris bada• miamibeachfl.gov Additionally, the City Clerk is toibe copied oft all communications via e-mail at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov; or via;facsimile: 786-394-4188 The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3RD Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado @miamibeachfl.gov RFQ 201 .-1 i-KB 4 MIA BEACH 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: htto://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES " CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2 373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2107 THROUGH 2 110 • LOCAL PREFERENCE FOR MIAMI BEACH BASED VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2 372 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or , public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. RFQ201612� KB 5 it 0 MIAMI BEACH 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADAI. Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters (five (5)days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. Omitted Intentionally 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. RFQ - 0 16-1 4-KB 6 sal MIAMI BEACH 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Resection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. RFQ •16- A-KB 7 M A iBEACH 26.TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit (and cause hotel operator to prohibit) discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability in the sale, lease, use or occupancy of the Hotel Project or any portion thereof. RFQ 2.16-12A-KB g IAW\IBEACH 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the g oods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 'FQ 2016-12A-KB 9 CA MIAM BEACH 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are. exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43. OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal,.State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. RFQ 2016-124-KB 10 fiJ f AM 1 BEACH 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of•his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and 'Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFN •16 124 KB 1 1 0. MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. 1.3.1 Request for Qualification Similar Experience. For each project that complies with the minimum requirements on Appendix C, Section C1, No. 1 & 2, submit project name, project contact information (phone and email)and prime proposer's role in project. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.3 Financial Capacity. Each proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https:ll supplierportal.dnb.comlwebapplwcsl stores lservlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 RFQ 2016-124-KB 12 FIJI BEACH Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun &Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2016-124 KB 13 ®► MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. • Step 2 ;Quantitative Criteria - - Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three (3) years from the due date for proposal. See Section 4 5 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP2 POINTS, _ 10, 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three (3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2016-124-KB 14 ® MIAMI BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 2016-124-KB 15 APPENDIX A 0, I A IBLAU-1 Response Certification , Questionnaire Re uirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 016-.124-KB 16 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2016-124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000 Ext. 6218 KristyBada @miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: I No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally:OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: - ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. R Q 2016-124-KB 1 7 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an public sector agency? YES an NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five (5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2016-124-KB 18 7. - •: . _ - shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012 13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.281hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI U)Miami/Ft. Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material br ach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties . .. .• . !! II. . .. . .• .. • ... -- .• . . . . ... - culendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005 3191 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who arc awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES '19 8. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? YES 1119 .. •• .. •- . benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as ber avcment leave; other benefits arc provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Pfevides-fer Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sisk-Leave Family Medical Leavo Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of r aeons outside your control, (e.g., there arc no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and-he-City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal RFQ 2016- 4-KB 19 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. 11. Non-Discrimination. Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 12. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. RFQ 2016-124-KB 20 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMERSECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge, information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2.16-1 A-KB 21 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20 ,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: • RFQ 2.16-124-KB 22 APPENDIX B RA " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. RFQ 2016-124-KB 23 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive _ Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Kristy Bada STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS#2016-124-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2016-1 4-KB 24 r APPENDIX C MIAMI Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2016-124-KB 25 C1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Prime Proposer or Team Member shall have completed Design Criteria Package services for no less than three (3) parking garage structures within the last ten (10)years. Submittal Requirement: For each project, submit project name, brief description of project, date of completion, owner's representative, and owner's representative contact information. 2. The Prime Proposer (Architectural/Engineering Firm) shall be certified as "Architect" or "Architect Business"or hold a "Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. 3. Prime Proposer must have a minimum of ten (10) years' experience in their designated professional specialization. C2. Statement of Work Required. The purpose of the Design Criteria Package is to furnish sufficient information to permit Design- Build firms to prepare a bid or a response to the City's request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated Design-Build contract. The Design Criteria Package must at a minimum specify performance-based criteria for the public construction project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, storm water retention and disposal, plus parking, retail spaces, housing requirements applicable to the project. The following is a list of proposed Parking Garages which may require Design Criteria Professional Services. The City may add or remove sites from the list below as deemed necessary. 1. Police Station/12th Street Garage (Garage 2) 2. Collins/13th Street(Parking Lot 16) 3. Washington/10th Street(Parking Lot 13) 4. 2660 Collins Ave (Parking Lot 55) 5. 930 Wash Ave (Parking Lot12) 6. Terranova 830 W 42nd St(Parking Lot 62) 7. 1623 West Ave (Parking Lot 23) 8. 1671 West Ave (Parking Lot 24) 9. Fire Station 1 /Parking Garage at Flamingo Park C3. Specifications Professional (DCP) shall provide sufficient documentation to study the various options, assist with prioritization work with City to address budget implications. In creating the Design Criteria Package the DCP shall consult with City of Miami Beach Departments, as selected by City staff, to seek input. The Design Criteria Package may include the development of a parking garage that may RFQ 2016-1 4-KB 26 include a pedestrian plaza, retail spaces, housing, and other facilities. Pursuant to FL 287.055(9)(b) a Design Criteria Professional (DCP) who has been selected to prepare the Design Criteria Package for the City is not eligible to render services under a Design- Build contract executed pursuant to the Design Criteria Package. The basic services provided by the DCP Consultant shall include but not be limited to preparation of bidding documents incorporating schematic design, performance specifications and design criteria for the Project (the bidding documents shall require compliance with the design criteria by the Design-Build firm awarded this Project) and enforcement of the design criteria including but not limited to notifying the City of regarding the Design-Builder's compliance or non-compliance with the requirements of the design criteria. The successful DCP Consultant will be tasked with the following duties and responsibilities: 1. Schematic The DCP Consultant shall become familiar with the Project site and shall provide the City with the following services as part of this task: a) Update the existing topographic survey. b) Provide Geotechnical Soils report. c) Provide Drainage Calculations and preliminary drainage analysis for the proposed stormwater design. d) Review and validate the City's proposed Project schedule and construction phasing plan. • e) Analyze the cost estimates prepared by the City for this Project and provide an updated construction estimate. 2. Design Criteria Package The DCP Consultant shall coordinate with the City, as to the methodology, procedures, format and other specifics that the Design Criteria Package shall contain. The Design Criteria Professional shall prepare the Design Criteria Package for bidding by incorporating all information as required by the City, and all federal, state, and applicable local codes. The preparation of the design criteria bidding documents shall include, but not be limited to the following: a) Finalize all design criteria for the Project to be utilized by Design-Build firms to bid, design and construct the Project. The design criteria shall include issues related to infrastructure design analysis of the schematic phase design, and performance specifications. b) Preparation, coordination and incorporation of all construction related documents, RFQ 2016-1 4-KB 27 including front-end documents. c) Coordination of bidding documents and other related deliverables, to ensure consistency of Design-Build bid documents. d) The DCP Consultant shall consult with the City in preparation of the design criteria bid documents and shall seek approval from all applicable City staff prior to bidding the Project. 3. Bidding and Award of Contract The DCP Consultant shall assist the City during in obtaining the bid and award of the Design-Build contract for the work that was bid pursuant to the Design Criteria Contract documents. 4. Design-Builder's Design Phase The DCP Consultant shall, at a minimum, monitor the Design-Builder's design phase as follows: a) The DCP Consultant shall instruct the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record to prepare all required drawings utilizing CADD. b) The DCP Consultant shall instruct the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record team of the City's requirements as to the various phases of design and approvals required and/or mandated by the City. c) Coordinate and monitor the Design-Builder's design phases and recommend approval or disapproval to the City. d) Respond to all inquiries and evaluate alternatives presented from the Design-Builder for compliance with the bidding documents and possible City approval. e) Review all Design-Builder's documentation at all phases of design, submit and obtain review comments and subsequent approvals from the City's departments having the authority to review the Project. 5. Construction Phase The DCP Consultant shall ensure and require that the Design-Builders Engineer of Record team provide construction administration of the construction to ascertain compliance with all approved construction documents This shall include but not be limited to construction administration of the Design-Build Construction Contract as set forth in City's agreement with the DCP Consultant and in the General Conditions of the Design-Build Construction Contract, unless otherwise provided in City's agreement with the DCP Consultant. RFQ 2016-1 4-KB 28 On the basis of on-site observations as the DCP Consultant, the DCP Consultant shall keep the City and Design-Builder informed immediately in writing of the progress or lack of progress and quality of the construction work and shall endeavor to guard the City against defects and deficiencies in said work. The Consultant shall at all times have access to the work, whether it is in the preparation stage or in progress. The DCP Consultant shall conduct on-site observation visits during the construction of the Project. Compensation for each authorized site visit shall be determined during negotiations at a lump sum cost per visit. The frequency of the on-site visits will be determined by the City's Projects Manager based on the Design-Builder's schedule. The DCP Consultant shall prepare a monthly progress report in the format acceptable to the City. 6. Design-Builders Submittals The DCP Consultant shall review and evaluate samples, schedules, shop drawings, and other submissions for conformance with the Design Criteria and the Design-Build Contract documents. The DCP Consultant shall also prepare in a timely manner change order items, including the proper documentation, for the City's review and approval. The DCP Consultant shall assemble, for transmittal to the City other written items required for the Design-Builder including, but not limited , to, shop drawings, guarantees, operation and maintenance manuals, and releases of claim and record documents. 7. Quality Control The DCP Consultant shall evaluate the materials and/or workmanship for conformance with the Design-Build Contract Documents, evaluate quality control testing reports, advise the Design- Builder and the City immediately of any unacceptable materials and workmanship the DCP Consultant may discover and ensure that the Design-Builder take appropriate action to remedy unacceptable conditions. 8. Certification for Payments The DCP Consultant shall require that the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record review and approve all requisitions for payment prior to submitting them to the DCP Consultant. The DCP Consultant shall review the Design-Builder's notarized requisitions for payment, along with the schedule of values, the Project schedule, and other requirements as noted in the construction contract and shall determine the amounts to be paid to the Design-Builder and shall recommend for City's approval certificates for payments in such amounts. These certificates will constitute a representation to the City that the work has progressed to the point indicated. 9. Record Drawings Upon completion of construction, the DCP Consultant shall coordinate and require that the Design- Builder's Engineer of Record, utilizing record data provided by the Design-Builder along with the Engineer of Record's own record data, shall revise and update the original working drawings showing all changes made by addenda, substitutions, change orders or field instructions during RFQ 2016-124-KB 29 construction, in accordance with the Design-Build Contract. After original working drawings have been updated by the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record to conform to the record data, and after review and approval of these record drawings has been obtained from the Consultant and the City, the DCP Consultant shall require the Engineer of Record and the Design-Builder's expense for duplication, to furnish the City these documents pursuant to the Design Build contract. 10. Substantial Completion Upon notification from the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record that the Project is substantially complete including, but not limited to , the Design Builder's contract and all Regulatory Agency and Life Safety Standards, the Consultant shall promptly do the following: Conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of substantial completion for the project. If the project is found substantially complete and in accordance with the Design-Build Contract documents, the DCP Consultant shall then certify that to the best of the DCP Consultant's knowledge and professional judgment the Project has been constructed in accordance with the Contract Documents, and shall furnish such other certification as required by applicable laws or regulations. If the Project is deemed to be incomplete, the DCP Consultant shall notify the Design- Builder in writing of the deficiencies and shall verify the Design-Builder's correction of the deficiencies, as required, and shall then certify. 11. Final Completion If the DCP Consultant finds the Project to be complete and acceptable, the DCP Consultant shall obtain the City's approval to advise the Contractor of acceptance and commencement of the warranty period. 12. Project Closeout Upon acceptance of the Project by the City as outlined in the Design Build contract, the DCP consultant shall immediately commence the closeout of the Project, finalizing all aspects of the construction phase, including: obtaining from the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record all required submittals, such as marked-up record documents, warranties, operating and maintenance manuals, releases of claim; updating and submitting record documents; verifying the Contractor's completion of punch list items; assisting the City with respect to the final inspection by all authorizing jurisdictions; completing the processing of any remaining contract change orders; evaluating the assessment of liquidated damages, if any, and reviewing and processing final payments to the contractors. RFQ 2O1v6-1 4- B 30 APPENDIX D 0,, I AM BEACH 1 Special Conditions RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2016-124 KB 31 2.OPTIONS TO RENEW. Not Applicable. 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorneys'fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of this Agreement by the Provider or its employees, agents, servants, partners principals or subcontractors. Provider shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Provider expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Provider shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8.SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source"or restricted without prior written approval of the City. 13. PRECLUSION. Successful Proposer and sub-consultants contracted to provide architectural and engineering design services for a particular project are precluded from bidding/responding to the competitive solicitation for the design construction of the project. 14. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER.A change in the Consultant's project manager(as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the City project manager). RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D — Page 32 15. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 16. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services, deliverables and cost of services. RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D — Page 33 APPENDIX E O. AA I 1I A 1 BEAC Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parkin g Garages es PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D - Page 34 4- • MIAMI BF Ac H INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D — Page 35 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 33 t. Qualifications to provide Architectural & Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages for " ., ,r-t Miami teach; FL • Y �� -= Attn: Kristy Bada, Contracting Officer II Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 ��- L _ l k4 2 Submitted May 20, 2016 by DESMAN Design Management 2881 E. Oakland Park Blvd. Suite 209 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306 954.315.1797 Point of Contact- Christian Luz, AICP Email -cluz @desman.com www.DESMAN.com QUALIFICATIONS Architectural/Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages Miami Beach, FL TAB Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1: Cover Letter&Table of Contents 1.2: Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) 1.3: Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.3.1: Request for Qualification Similar Experience DESMAN Design Management ARCHITECTS DEsii. 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS jI PLANNERS PARKING CONSULTANTS Design Management RESTORATION ENGINEERS GREEN PARKING CONSULTING May 20, 2016 Ms. Kristy Bada Contracting Officer II Procurement Department City of Miami Beach 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: RFQ 2016-124-KB: Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages Ms. Bada, DESMAN Inc. (DESMAN) is pleased to present this Statement of Qualifications to provide Architectural and Engineering Design Criteria Professional (DCP) Services to the City of Miami Beach (City) for Mixed- Use Parking Garages. DESMAN is one of the country's leading experts in the development of design specifications, design criteria and design of mixed-use parking garages. DESMAN was instrumental in the re-invention of the mixed-use garage garage in Miami Beach in 1984 with the design of the 7th and Collins Avenue mixed-use garage. DESMAN served as both the Architect and Engineer-of-Record for the joint project developed by the City and Goldman Properties. DESMAN, and the world-class team we have assembled, offers the City unparalleled experience and expertise in all stages of project development, from planning and programming, development of design criteria, cost estimating, scheduling, consensus building and endorsement, through construction observation and oversight to project close-out. DESMAN will serve as the prime DCP for this assignment while bringing to bear a team of experts available to respond to any planning issue, development program, site condition, or design challenge with creative, cost effective, feasible and implementable solutions for any site under consideration. The proposed Project Manager for the DESMAN Team is Christian R. Luz, PE, AICP. Christian is the leader of DESMAN's South Florida office and authority to act for DESMAN regarding this submittal and can be contacted at the address, email, office or cellphone number listed in this letter and our SOQ. Christian has over 30 years of experience in planning, programming, design and construction oversight of parking projects. Timothy Tracy, DESMAN's Principal-in-Charge of the South Florida office, will provide executive and technical support to Christian on this assignment. Tim also has over 30 years of experience in feasibility, structural design, construction of mixed-use parking garages and design/build parking projects. We believe we have proposed a unique and flexible approach that will serve the City in the best way possible. Although DESMAN is a registered architectural firm in Florida, we have included three highly specialized architectural firms on the DESMAN Team to provide the flexibility to deliver the right solution for any given site: • Built Form Architects. Robert Bistry, AIA, (while with another firm) served as design architect for several high profile projects in the City of Miami Beach including the mixed-use garages proposed at 709 Alton Road and 1212 Lincoln Road, both projects that DESMAN provided parking consulting services as well. In addition, Built Form was the design architect under contract to DESMAN for a highly successful, mixed-use garage constructed for a life-style center for the Township of Lansing, Michigan. 2881 E,OAKLAND PARK BLVD,SUITE 209,FT LAUDERDALE,FL 33306 www.DESMAN.com PHONE 954.315.1797 FAX 954.315 1702 BOSTON CHICAGO CLEVELAND DENVER FT. LAUDERDALE HARTFORD NEWYORK PITTSBURGH WASHINGTON D.C. DES.. LA1!T Pag E a of 3 Design Management • Bermello Ajamil & Partners. B&A has a long and trusted history in South Florida as an architectural firm that excels at developing creative design solutions including a significant portfolio in the design of parking structures. B&A has several on-going planning, programming and/or schematic design parking projects that involve DESMAN support for parking consulting services, including at the Port of Miami, for the Port of Tampa, the City of Bar Harbor, MN and site feasibility evaluations for the Miami Dade Expressway Authority. B&A will also provide landscape architecture services for the DESMAN Team. • Brooks+Scarpa Architects.The team of Brooks+Scarpa and DESMAN were just selected on the high profile expansion project for the Boston Convention and Exposition Center Expansion (BCEC). The planned expansion included design, engineering, layout, and operations of two garages with a combined capacity of 1,500 cars. One of the parking components included a "Future Use" parking facility that included design principles for future reuse for office, residential, lab space or light manufacturing. The Brooks + Scarpa/DESMAN Team was selected for the project from a comprehensive search of renowned design firms conducted by the BCEC for their excellence in design and approach to this challenging and forward thinking venture. Not only are several of the most talented design architects represented on the DESMAN Team, we are collaborating with Lansing Melbourne Group, LLC (LMG). While DESMAN will lead the majority of the design criteria effort for any given site, LMG will be instrumental in providing post-design and construction oversight services for the Team and City. While acting in a slightly different role, LMG served as the owner's representative for Lansing Township on the mixed-use garage designed by Built Form and DESMAN in Lansing, Michigan. In addition, LMG also served as the owner's representative for the City of Pompano Beach on their new beachside garage. DESMAN and Robert Bistry once again provided consulting services together with LMG in site selection, feasibility and programming for the beachside garage. DESMAN, Built Form and LMG have worked together on planning, programming, design and construction of numerous parking projects over the past ten years. The balance of the DESMAN Team is represented by the most talented engineering, planning, and technical firms in South Florida. The entire DESMAN Team is listed below by their anticipated role. The expertise required for a specific site may vary and not all the roles may be necessary for every site. However,we thought it was important to ensure we had the consulting expertise available if needed. • Prime A/E Design Criteria Professional • MEP o DESMAN o. Louis J.Aguirre &Associates • Urban Planning/Programming • Geotech/Civil Engineering/Environmental o Built Form o Langan Engineering o Bermello Ajamil & Partners • Landscape Architecture o Brooks+Scarpa Architects o Bermello Ajamil & Partners • Architecture (including LEED) • Traffic Engineering o Built Form o DESMAN o Bermello Ajamil & Partners o Langan Engineering o Brooks+Scarpa Architects • Survey • Parking Consulting o Pulice Land Surveyors, Inc. o DESMAN • Project Scheduling o Bermello Ajamil & Partners o Draper&Associates • Structural Engineer • Cost estimating o DESMAN o Straticon • Green Garage Criteria o DESMAN ARCHITECTS DES , A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PLANNERS PARKING CONSULTANTS Design Management RESTORATION ENGINEERS GREEN PARKING CONSULTING We believe the flexibility and expertise represented by the DESMAN Team will provide the City with the appropriate expertise required for programming the mixed use potential any of the ten sites whether that's office,commercial, workforce/other housing,civic/community, retail,or other use. We trust this Statement of Qualifications provides evidence that DESMAN Team has the capability and experience to act as the City's Design Criteria Professional on any of the ten sites identified in the RFQ and that we exceed the requirements and provide the necessary expertise and flexibility to serve as the City's design criteria professional for mixed-use parking garages and demonstrate a history of similar quality work, completed on time and on budget. We look forward to your selection process and an opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach to you following our submittal. Please contact me at any time should you have questions about this Statement of Qualifications. Very truly yours, DESMAN Q Christian R. Luz,AICP Associate/Office Leader 2881 E.OAKLAND PARK BLVD,SUITE 209,FT LAUDERDALE,FL 33306 www.DESMAN.com PHONE 954.315.1797 FAX 954.315.1702 BOSTON CHICAGO CLEVELAND DENVER FT. LAUDERDALE HARTFORD NEWYORK PITTSBURGH WASHINGTON D.C. APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Re a uirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2016-124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 z7TT24-KB Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 4 Solicitation No: !Solicitation Title: 2016-124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services . Procurement Contact 1 Tel: Email: •Kristy Bada 1305-673-7000 Ext.6218 KristyBada @miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME DESMAN,Inc: No of Years in Business: • No of Years in Business Locally: 43 •5 1 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A !FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 349 West 37th Street,5th Floor 1 CITY: I New York STATE: ZIP CODE: I NY 10018 TELEPHONE NO.: • 212.686.5360 TOLL FREE NO.: NIA., FAX NO.: 212.779.1654 .FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 2881 East Oakland Park Boulevard CITY: Ft.Lauderdale STATE: ZIP CODE:. t FL 33306 • PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Christian Luz ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 1 954.315.1797 @ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO:: li NIA . ACCOUNT.REP.EMAIL: �.. .. _.... __. duz@desman.com !FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 11-2709775 The City reserves the right to seek additional information.from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. 0 0 T 6-=20 Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 5 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? [EYES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References 8 Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? [ I YES ENO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. John Fujiwara-has not contributed. Giri Chhabra-has not contributed. Anup Chhabra-has not contributed. Stephen Rebore-has not contributed..., _. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 7. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. DESMAN is happy to adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics. k' Tb-T -Pg Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 6 7., Living—Wage.—Pursuant to Sod en 4408 of the Miami City Cede,-es same may-be amended from lime,to lime,=reposers shall be required to payoff employees whe provide services pursuant to lh Agreement,the howdy iwiAg+gage rates listed belew: •--Commeasiag with Cityfiscal year 2042 43(Osteber4,4042);=the hourly fiiring rate wit be$14.284hr with health benefits,-and$12.82Ihr without benefits: The-living'-wage fate end-health dare benifits-rate-may.-by Resolution-el-the-gay Coniaission be-indexed anairally-for iafladen' using the Consumer Prise.lndex ter all Urban Cencum:0416AI h anmilFt.lauderdale,issued by the U.S.-Department of Labor's Bureau of laver Statistics.Aietwithstand'ing.the prosediag.-oo annual index shall exceed ihreepercent(3%).--The City mayalse;by resehrtiekeiest tauttoindex the living wage rate in anypadicular year,-d it determines it would net be fiscally sound to' impleateat same(inaparticular year). Prepesers'4ailure to comply with this prevision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,-under which the City may; at its eete option,-immediately deem:said-Proposer as non respensive.-and may further subject Proposer to additional"amities and.fines,-as.provided in.the City-diving Wage Crdinanceres amended:--PratheraMormaton an the giving 4Nage requiroment-is available at www.miamibeashfilevirkesufementi. SU8MI AL REQUIREMENT:No additional Submittal is required.-By virtue of executing this affidavit document-Proposer agrees lo-theliving wage requirement. EquafBenefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.-When awarding sempetitively solicited contracts valued at over$444,008 whose contractors maintain-44-ef more full lime employees en their payrolls during 20 or were calendar-work weeke,-he Equal Benefits-ferDemestis Partners Ordinates 2005 3494-requiroc sedairr contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beady-whir are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,-4e provide!Equal Benefits'4a their employees-with domestic partners.-as they provide to employees:with spouses.-The&dinance applies-to ell-employees-el a Contracter-who work within-the City limits of the City'of MiamiBeach,-Florida;and the Contractor's employees locatedla the United States,-bat outside of the City of Miami•'Beach limits--who are direstlypedorming work on the contract within the City of Miami Eleaeti: k--Dees your company provide or offer assess to any Ibeirefits teemployees with spouses or to spouses of employees?, NB B-—Does your-company provide or offer,assess to any benefits teempleyees with(same er opposite-sex)demestispartnere torte domestic partners of employees? a-€S NA 6.-Please check all-benefits• hat`ap de IOW-answers--above and-list 4n-the°ether-section any-additional benefits notalready specified.-Nate:some benefits are:provided to employees because theyllave aspo ise ec domestic partner,-eueh as bereavement lc3vc;,ethef benefits are provided directly to die spouse oc domestics partner,-such as medical insurance. . . . • ° . Finn Provides for- I Fiat Provides for Firmdees net - Employees with Employees with. I Provide Benefit Health Sisk Leave i C am+.ly=Medical ,re Bereavement Leave i If-Proposer'sannet otter a benefit to domestic partners-because of feaseas outside-your-control,-(e.g.rthere are rue insurance providers in your area w ingtaef er domestic tner-severage)you-may►be eligible for Reasonable Measures oempiianse.-fie comply on.-this basis,-you-must-agree 4o-pay a sash-equivalent and-submit a-completed Reasonable-MeasuredApplicatien (attached)with all necessary desum_entation.4o r Reasonable.Measures Application will be reviewed*senederation by the City Managerrer this designee.-Appreval is net-guaranteed and the City 4anageee-desisiontstinal-Fwther information:en the Equal Benefits requirement-is-available at www.miamibeashA.eevlpresurementl.- • Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 7 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm R9 t 1 _.-_Receipt ; _ Receipt-......__ JH Addendum 1 I _._ I Addendum 6 ;Addendum 11 JH Addendum 2 j I Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 7 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 I I Addendum.9 . .. _.._. Addendum 14.,.._,� Addendum 5_ ,_I_._: . .__._. _..I Addendum 10 Addendum 15 I If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. 11. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 12. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is anil shall remairi in`till compliance withResoliiion 2016-29375. Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 8 DISCLOSURE AND,DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the'City')for the recipients convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in suchinqurry or rnvesti a ion. achProposer oertifies'that the"information-contained truth€Staterrentof Qualifications— is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto,or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 9 PROPOSER,CERTIFICATION • I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate...__. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Jeff Henriksen,RA Vice President - Signature of '5 elle101i.led Representative Date: ! - �, 5116/16 Sll�nois State of fgallffir On this jaNay of..may__,2011,personally appeared before meJet iksmwho County of Ga o k ) stated that (s)he is the vie," Pees.4et of.0E5Mr4gSac.. a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed.Before me: No IV Public for the State of.! 211 1.v,ois M jhLbmmission Expires: (9 i -67/ ^.r-; OFFICIAL SEAL - - - . ` JANIS A HOLTZ NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF IWNOIS _My.Commisslon-Expires Jan.7,.2017—_.. Section 1.2: Appendix A Page 10 DESJ1A Design Management Section 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements Orlando,Florida DESMAN served as Reedy Creek Improvement District's Consultant for the conceptual planning, T*" feasibility design, schematic design and design development phases of two new multi-level parking structures that are designed to house+/-6,000 vehicles. DESMAN provided bridging documents for an RFP developed for Design-Build teams to fast-track one of the two anticipated facilities.In addition,DESMAN provided traffic analysis for both facilities which included garage• " operations,external ramping design,entry and egress capacities and traffic flow and internal/ Q w_ external traffic simulations.DESMAN is currently serving as Owner's Representative for OAQC - review of the Design-Build teams CD's and during construction of Phase I. nw = • The Phase I parking structure was designed as a cast-in-place post-tensioned structure with+/- - ' eigib711r 3,800 vehicles on 4 supported levels(5 total levels).Each level of the facility was approximately 295,000 s.f.,equivilant to over 5 football fields,and containing between 750 and 820 vehicles ' t per level.The Phase II facility,to begin construction in approximately one year,also cast-in-place post-tensioned,will contain around 2,200 vehicles on 3 supported levels(4 total levels)with+/- Project Owner:Reedy Creek 170,000 s.f.per level.DESMAN's role in the project included: Improv.District - Review and confirmation of project goals and program statement documents.This Point of Contact: Kathryn Kolbo, included the master plan concept,mix of PE parking user groups and length of stay durations and peak occupancies based on Phone:407.828.2250 projections provided by the Owner. Email:kkobol @rcid.org - Review and configuration of site constraints at selected parking garage site. Completion:2014 - Development of multiple alternate functional design concepts during the conceptual design phase.Modifications made in the development of the original concepts were incorporated into the schematic and design development drawings. Drawings depicted parking layouts, internal/ external traffic flow, exit/entrance lanes, ramping system configuration, connections to external roadway systems, etc. Issues addressed during the conceptual layout included vehicle ingress points,ramping methods,number and location of entrance lanes,internal traffic flow,parking geometry,vehicle exiting, auxiliary space location and allocation,pedestrian routes/facilities,etc. - Consultation during the design development phase included finalizing plans, traffic analysis,details and specifications for numerous components for the RFP. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 1.3: Minimum Qualifications Requirements DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 11 DESMAN Design Management Section 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements f• i. ` i: 11,ii } i1 _i.0{Al?a(a 1.1.}(a• 1. ',r I�� }�-0^ �— •= \�; i d 4t Nationwide t/ ri •Hub r' DESMAN worked with the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities � spoke , ._: at boom.a,m, .l. Management and its member institutions to investigate the VA's parking criteria and methodolo- gies for determining required parking spaces at new and existing facilities. Changing patterns in Project Owner: US Dept. of Vet the manner in which the VA delivers its services needed to be reflected in the manner in which Affairs the VA determined parking space requirements. Twenty-one(21)existing VA facilities were de- Point of Contact:Zoltan Nagy termined to be pilot sites. DESMAN visited each site,interviewed key personnel,and observed Phone:202.632.5391 existing parking conditions. Based on data collected, DESMAN created an Excel-based parking Email:zoltan.nagy @va.gov demand model that calculated parking demand and space requirements for different user groups Completion:2012 (inpatients,outpatients,staff,etc.)at different VA healthcare facilities in different environments urban,suburban and rural) Independent of the Parking Demand Model,DESMAN was also tasked with evaluating the VA's spinal cord injury/disorder(SCI/D)treatment centers'patient parking space provision. Working in parallel with the Paralyzed Veterans of America(PVA),DESMAN updated the parking require- ments on a per bed and per treatment/observation room basis. This update included significant expansion to the recommended percentage of van accessible spaces to be provided for SCI/D patients. DESMAN also developed the Parking Design Guide for the VA. This document,which will serve as the master reference manual for architects and planners,includes procurement,architectural, structural,physical security requirements,and criteria that will be used in the analysis and design of parking lots and structures. The Guide addresses campus organization,construction method- ologies,parking geometrics,access controls,structured parking design,surface parking lot design, operations and maintenance topics. Baitmiore,MD The Maryland Transit Administration engaged DESMAN to modernize its parking design guide Project Owner: Maryland Transit initially authored by DESMAN in 2001 with a revision made in 2005. The guide will be used as Administration reference material by future designers,and will be inserted into Transit oriented Development Point of Contact:Pat Keller agreements with third part developers. Phone:410.767.3889 Email:pkeller @mta.maryland.gov DESMAN conducted in-person and telephone interviews with designated MTA personnel to gain Completion:2015 institutional insight regarding parking. These interviews combined with the firm's internal knowl- edge and research regarding state of the art design formed the basis of the guide's narrative. The revised manual addresses a number of characteristics including procurement methods,site adaptability and relationships to site features, accessibility, applicable Building Codes, sustain- ability, parking functionality,structural durability,access controls,aesthetics,passive and active security and safety requirements,annual inspections,and ongoing maintenance. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 1.3: Minimum Qualifications Requirements DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 12 DESMAN Design Management Section 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements State c F1rida Boarcif ` IProessional Erneers J". ' :0.-i k jttes s Shat % 7: „ tut, s l an,Inc _;q AFBPE � } 'fi it F 44 " f i 141:1 -`4 ,+ ,, • is authorized under the provlst s oFrScccio f 114 outs, to offer engineering services to the public through a ProFessio al rtgmeer,dale tr` '.air der.Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration: 2/28!2017 ;,- ffi.__ ;_'., ,_ CA Lie.No: Audit No: 22820170342 STATE OFFLORIDA ' _-, .- DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION -.` - , BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN I LICENSE NUMBER W \ ,t AA26002631 - '. `._. _ ,:- . > - -_ fit. - I°-The ARCHITECT CORPORATION -1, ,,,., - �v > - .: AA ;". 1 Nafned 4elow IS CERTIFIED ._ , 1-;Under'the,provisions of Chapter481 PS. " ti :�, 1 L. -date FEB28 2017- v ..;-,-,,:''''':`.. .`-''',„ '‘',`..,--'=, y - =DESMA.N INCA ° W 49 W 37TH STREET STN FLOOR.. :r - NEWYORK'; NY 10018 -;? rr� / ,,,- r State of Florida ,,,� ,,� -�-'- -=,,T, :H Department of State , I certify from the recorda of this office that DESW\N,INC.is n Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,qualified on November 7,19x6, The document number of this corpnrelion is P12057. 1 further certify that said corporation has paid all Res due this office through December 31,2013,that ha most recent cinnual r ponruniform busnttns repo 1 uu filed on February 1.2013,and is stators is active. I further certi&that said mrporaliew has not tiled a Certificate of"RSdrJrnwW, Ohre■endrr rip hand and the Great Seal oftne Pule ofnorida of Tallehuror,t e Cayiral,this d thy raw dry of February,2013 ZNI 5tte TN, � ti „.A y.. Secretary of State A.rhratiral..In:cCS115L9 To a.,5 ee0e.0 ilh«nira.0,i.t Ih.414.:.,.rust.,M. Ir.M them 414■the lera.rain.r. ditea yeti. lnPwnrnl..mbic.r,.ivl.21.er. I , City of Miami Beach,FL Section 1.3: Minimum Qualifications Requirements DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 13 QUALIFICATIONS Architectural/Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages Miami Beach, FL TAB 2 Experience & Qualifications 2.1: Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2.2: Qualifications of Proposer Team 2.3: Financial Capacity DES2IN Design Management DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESMAN is a leading national specialist in the planning,design,and restoration of cost- effective and aesthetically pleasing parking facilities and mixed use parking facilities. Our firm was founded in 1973 as an abbreviation for Design Management with the vision to combine creativity with innovation and sound design principles using reliable technical and organizational practices. Parking is our forte,and problem solving is our specialty. Our projects consistently reach a balance of efficiency,durability and value. Since the firm's inception,DESMAN has served public,private,and institutional Clients and Owners throughout the U.S. and abroad and has provided planning, design, and restoration services for over 5,000 parking and transportation projects. DESMAN is an employee-owned corporation that currently employs a staff of over 100 personnel and operates nationally from the following nine office locations: Denver,CO Cleveland,OH Boston,MA Chicago,IL Ft.Lauderdale,FL Hartford,CT New York,NY Washington,DC Pittsburgh,PA MISSION STATEMENT Our firm is set up to encourage the creative process,to share ideas and talents among all of our offices and deliver an exceptional end-product to our clients. DESMAN em- braces diversity and is committed to providing excellence in the design of parking facili- ties, rehabilitation programs for existing structures,and innovative parking studies for all market sectors. Innovation through Collaboration,Success by Design Internally,we strive to enrich the lives of our employees and embrace personal values. We care about serving our clients,and improving the communities in which we work. Our enduring client relationships reflect our ongoing commitment to the principles of collaboration,partnership and hard work. PARKING RELATED SERVICES a , • Functional Design e Q\y m • Architecture 4�` • Structural Engineering '� �i„.I� • Parking Supply&Demand • Operations Consulting • Traffic/Transportation Engineering • Master Planning • Restoration Engineering/Materials Engineering • Revenue Control Consulting • Owner's Agent Program Management • Site Evaluation/Assessment of Parking Structure Alternatives • Financial Feasibility(Pro Forma)Analysis • Design/Build Project Delivery Method City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 14 • DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm i Where DESMAN Excels oy ! N� r t;•7?c. ry's\ it Purpose: DESMAN is a company that cares. DESMAN cares about its employees and cli- , ,� F . ' ents and invests in both of them so that we work together on projects driven by passion . *"i . and not just results. t s ' - - 4:. Depth of Experience:DESMAN is one of the nation's premier parking consulting firms,of- fering parking consulting services as well as planning,design,structural engineering,and 1 i restoration services of parking structures.DESMAN has designed over 3,000 new garages . —-= and repaired over 2,000. J * ` Diversity: DESMAN is a very diverse firm that truly understands every aspect of parking related solutions from facility and system planning,design,management,project feasibil- � +e: ; '• ity,facility inspections,restoration engineering,maintenance,and life-cycle cost analysis. n ,. ., Creativity and Innovation:DESMAN challenges itself every day to come up with the most 1.• 6 _' -'41 creative and innovative solutions possible, so that the projects that we work on show .1 long-term improvement.Our projects shape lives. ,,i), - ...-- Sustainability:DESMAN considers the environment,health and social matters to be inte- gral and important parts of all our business activities.As such, DESMAN has made it our mission to utilize smart, innovative practices that will improve the quality of life for all those who partake in the design,construction,ownership or use of our projects. ,,,. Longevity of DESMAN Staff and Involvement:DESMAN prides itself on employee longev- ity.Our typical employees are with us on an average of 15-20 years. -ag Technology:DESMAN has long been on the forefront of building technology and as such has always invested in appropriate tools to best communicate our designs to owners,con- tractors and consultants. - _ -m_ lAd A'it/ 1 f sue.....: i*, City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 15 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm r° v ,. Miami Beach,Florida i E... .. L k , . ilb.,,I,iljpi_ w.y._..; - The 7th &Collins mixed-use parking facility owned by the City of Miami Beach and Goldman Properties through an air-rights arrangement, serves as one of the centerpiece properties in the rejuvenated National Historic District,Art Deco South Beach area. The existing ground level storefront facades were retained and restored in-place. A fiberglass trellis was incorporated into ;,;,,-; the façade of the upper parking levels to support perimeter planters that surround the edge l"T11' "''"y��,,, of each floor. Selected color-coded plantings were installed. At full growth,the plantings are "' 'i';;,;_;;; intended to simulate the color and profile of ocean waves. An irrigation system was installed ' for the planters. ' '� '��"""' The garage structural system consists of precast, pre-stressed concrete with double-tee floor beams,which are pre-topped. A single-helix vehicle circulation system was chosen with two ' r . way traffic and 90 degree parking stalls. Security consists of call for assistance stations located throughout the facility. The garage is fully sprinklered to meet the local fire codes. Hose bibs are located on each floor for wash-down purposes. A traffic bearing,waterproofing membrane was Project Owner: City of Miami applied on parking floor surfaces above commercial/retail areas. A clear penetrating sealer was Beach/Goldman Properties applied to other structurally supported parking areas. Point of Contact:Mario Courtney Phone:305. 4411 DESMAN is the prime Architect and Structural Engineer of Record and Parking Consultant. The Email:marlo @goldmanproper- local Miami Beach office of internationally renowned architect,Arquitectonica,served as design ties.com consultant for the exterior façade. The project was the 1999 Category I Design Award winner Completion:1996 for best parking structure design under 800 spaces by the International Parking Institute(IPI). 1 1 ►- 11110 Miami Beach,Florida rrilllli(i�'-i r: '"Z ..N r':a 4I - * > ■. ,.r Crescent Heights Development is planning a multi -level state-of-art mixed use parking struc- ture that will provide a unique development opportunity in the City of Miami Beach. This four level facility is proposed to provide approximately 30,000 square feet of ground floor com- mercial area that will have two levels of parking above which will be capped by 25,000 square feet of dfi ce and a green roof terrace. urie mill Fes. iii,-.7.9........-- . Currently, it is envisioned that Bapti st Health of South Florida will be the primary and maybe the sole tenant of the commercial and offi ce space. As such,this becomes a BHSF facility that " c- will provide emergency and walk-in health care for the immediate community. It is expected that the facility will provide approximately 200 spaces that will serve primarily the develop- ment and perhaps in off-park periods, the surrounding community. DESMAN is providing Project Owner:Perkins&Will parking consulti ng and structural engineering services to the prime architect Perkins&Will. Point of Contact: Jose Gelabert- Navia Phone:305.569.1333 Email: Jose.Gelabert-Navia @per- kinswill.com Completion:Est 2017 City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 16 ESIIil Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm p; °) " Miami,Florida t-,47- s Crescent Heights Development is proposing a complete redevelopment of the block at the intersecti on of Lincoln Road and Alton Road in Miami,Fl.The plan calls for the development Project Owner:Perkins&Will of an 85,000 square foot retail center on the street level with 3 levels of parking above to sup- Point of Contact: Jose Gelabert- Navia port the demand of the project.Incorporated on the ground level will be ingress and egress for Phone:305.569.1333 the parking and loading areas for the retail center.Current programming calls for 285 parking Email: Jose.Gelabert-Navia @per- spaces. DESMAN is providing parking consulti ng and structural engineering services to the kinswill.com prime architect Perkins&Will. Completion:Est 2017 iii ''• � ' ~ Miami,Florida %`- DESMAN is acti ng as Architect-of-Record and Engineer-of-Record to provide design services to s " prepare plans for the verti cal expansion of two existi ng garages that provide between 400 1 ` j and 600 spaces. The first tasks initi ated by the DESMAN team will be to undertake a Conditi -�' „ on Survey and Assessment of the existi ng North and South Garages that will identi fy and i le.., 1 quantify any areas of deteriorati on distress, corrosion, moisture infiltrati on or any unusual conditions. DESMAN evaluated the existing conditi on of the structural and other key garage components to include concrete members along with expansion joints, control joints, Project Owner. General Growth waterproofing mem-brane,etc. Properties Point of Contact:Mark DeCapri Simultaneously,DESMAN performed a Structural Expansion Study that included an investiga-ti Phone:312.960.2866 on of the existi ng garage to develop a scope of work needed to prepare both the Northside Email:mark.decapri @general- and Southside garages for two additi onal levels.The deliverable of this study was a scope of growth.com work for any necessary modificati ons to the existi ng garages to support two added levels. Completion:2015 As the final tasks,DESMAN will prepare schemati c,design development and constructi on documents for the garage expansion and perform constructi on administrati on. City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 17 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Al and A2 Parking Structures ems# " - DESMAN served as Reedy Creek Improvement District's Consultant for the conceptual plan- ' ping,feasibility design,schemati c design and design development phases of two new multi- w �r , level parking structures that are designed to house +/- 6,000 vehicles. DESMAN provided bridging documents for an RFP developed for Design-Build teams to fast-track one of the two anticipated faciliti es. In additi on DESMAN provided traffi c analysis for both facilities which included garage operati ons,external ramping design,entry and egress capaciti es and traffic fl ow and internal/external traffic simulati ons. DESMAN is currently serving as Owner's Repre- sentati ve for QAQC review of the Design-Build teams CD's and during constructi on of Phase I. The Phase I parking structure was designed as a cast-in-place post-tensioned structure with+/- ._, 3,800 vehicles on 4 supported levels (5 total levels). Each level of the facility was approxi- �` mately 295,000 s.f.,equivilant to over 5 football fi elds,and containing between 750 and 820 vehicles per level.The Phase II facility,to begin constructs on in approximately one year,also cast-in-place post-tensioned,will contain around 2,200 vehicles on 3 supported levels(4 total levels)with+/-170,000 s.f.per level.DESMAN's role in the project included: Project Owner:Reedy Creek .District Review and confi rmati on of project goals and program statement documents.This in- Point Point o of Contact:Kathryn Kolbo,PE • Phone:407.828.2250 cluded the master plan concept,mix of parking user groups and length of stay durati ons Email:kkobol @rcid.org and peak occupancies based on projecti ons provided by the Owner. Completion:2014 • Review and confi gurati on of site constraints at selected parking garage site. • Development of multiple alternate functional design concepts during the conceptual design phase. Modifi cats ons made in the development of the original concepts were incorporated into the schemati c and design development drawings.Drawings depicted parking layouts,internal/external traffi c fl ow,exit/entrance lanes,ramping system con-fi gurati on,connecti ons to external roadway systems,etc.Issues addressed during the conceptual layout included vehicle ingress points,ramping methods,number and loca-ti on of entrance lanes,internal traffi c fl ow,parking geometry,vehicle exiti ng,auxiliary space locati on and allocati on,pedestrian routes/faciliti es,etc. • Consultati on during the design development phase included fi nalizing plans,traffi c analy-sis, details and specifi cati ons for numerous components for the RFP. • Phase I parking garage is currently under construction and is anticipated to be complete in Fall 2014. City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 18 IDESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm ba Introduction Bermello Ajamil&Partners,Inc Bermello Ajamil & Partners Inc. (B&A) is one of the top international Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Landscape Architecture, Interior Design and Construction Services firms. B&A serves several market sectors including Municipal, Transportation, Maritime, Aviation, Commercial, Residential, Healthcare, and Education. Headquartered in Miami, the firm operates on 6 continents from its offices in Florida, New York and Copenhagen. B&A was originally founded in 1939 as a small local architectural firm and incorporated in the City of Miami under its current name in 1992. B&A has significant experience in both public and private sectors throughout the United States, Europe, the Middle East, South and Central America, and the Caribbean in several disciplines, including planning, development, design and construction of prominent commercial, industrial, government,education,transportation,environmental,healthcare,and multi-family residential projects. Experience with the City of Miami Beach B&A has previous working experience with the City of Miami Beach in the following roles: • Building Inspection &Plan Review , • Architecture and Engineering '° ' • Construction Inspection ,�►' '0 " 0 Experience with Other Municipalities B&A is accustomed to multi-task projects that span from the initial conceptual planning to the development of ideas and concepts through detailed design, preparation of construction documents, and the construction of the project. B&A has provided a variety of services for many governmental agencies and municipalities throughout Florida.We have successfully completed projects for the following (but not all inclusive): Monroe County Department of Marine Resources City of West Palm Beach Monroe County City of North Miami City of Miami City of Tamarac City of Coconut Creek City of Aventura .: Broward County Town of Bay Harbor Islands City of Hialeah Miami Dade Expressway Authority City of Coral Gables City of Hialeah Gardens $, 1 City of Hollywood City of Doral City of Hallandale Village of Palmetto Bay t "--- City of Pembroke Pines City of North Port .;,. City of Coral Springs City of Homestead Miami-Dade County Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department Port Everglades City of Fort Lauderdale City of Cape Coral City of Sunny Isles Beach City of Fort Myers Port of Miami City of St.Petersburg Florida Department of Transportation(3 Districts) City of Pompano Beach City of Miramar Florida Department of Management Services City of Cape Coral Miami-Dade County Public Works Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 19 U Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Bermee°Nan-14 Nan-14 &Partners.hr. PARKING GARAGE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Allure 5-Stories Oasis 5-Stories,975 Spaces Dr.Horatio E.Oduber Hospital(HOH) 2037 Master Plan-Visitor Parking Garage Spaces TBD Joseph Caleb Center Courthouse 475 spaces Coral Gables Museum Garage 633 spaces Terremark 1100 spaces Bayview Market 10-level,2,330 spaces 610 Clematis 360 spaces Douglas Grand 418 spaces Gables Grand 570 spaces One Broadway 1400 spaces Brickell View 421 spaces 1800 Club 9-stories Fortune House 342 spaces New French Village 46 spaces Onyx on the Bay 7-stories Skyline on Brickell 3-stories Summit Brickell 536 spaces Kallisto 39 spaces Crossroads Corporate Center 1000 spaces 2153 Coral Way 83 spaces 404 Washington 140 spaces Boca Raton Tri-Rail Mixed-Use Development 1000(surface and garage) Brickell Commons 1036 spaces Cypress Club 3562 spaces Dubai Maritime City 6,000 spaces Eclipse 5-level,630 spaces Saral Publications 2-story Eastern Financial Federal Credit Union 3-story,330 spaces Embassy Suites Hotel 7-level,217 spaces Filling Station 112 spaces Four Seasons Hotel 8 Tower 1200 spaces Grove Hill 242 spaces Hollywood Multimodal Center 1200 spaces Homestead Miami Speedway 120-Bay INTUR Corporate Office Building 5-Level Klemen Plaza 319 spaces Miami-Dade College Parking Garage Phase III 1,000 spaces,five-level MDWASD Headquarters Facility 10 story,705 spaces Mercy Hospital Parking Garage 5-story,786 spaces Miami Heart Institute 350 spaces Modello at Dania Beach 597 spaces N.E.2nd Street 236 spaces Singapore International Cruise Terminal 3-story,390 spaces SoHo 131 spaces City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 20 DES1111_11 Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm • Bermetio Ajam1&Partners.{nc. Filling Station Miami, Florida (fi 4 re tilt f L i l '■ r' 11111 . 1 ,.. NI a Ilia i 1. ilk, \\' ill NI ° ,., rov 1$ g It' - , rh o"- rsr yr e ' il - , ' J.,''''' "; - '''-'7,„„, 177- ,',4'-`-, :''''''-::iii,..12'')i,folliss't:"4/ '15,,,;441'-' ''''fu'''';;,''''''''d4'-',>.,4--.4,'il.,:.3,,;"---*14 io i 1.; � .r ti City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 21 DEsmAA Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Bernie°Ajamil&Partners,In Four Season Hotel, Residences&Parrking Garage Miami, Florida 7 I . 1 gg ^' y i. fit. -em' ,. s ii�en um Paritia x prop � ;8 million SF ��s, a , '1 ,I, ms, 1,000 parking' ,. . x225 m ton ded:Architectur Landscape ,4 . I ! rrar gnn r �, :'Y' - � �� .i. _. ,�,.� bf Airrerrrstn Arct!it7$1s mi Designlr►v�ard, o,, 744-77.4' City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 22 SMAI Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm t1471 P • 6errnelIo Aismil&PerLners,Inc. Museum Parking Garage Coral Gables, Florida 1 n 3q y Pt s :a' j �.. . `�„ P \ a.,' I i ; NINO tps , AI , y , • 4 i+ City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 23 DES11A y 11 -11 Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Miami, Florida 8ermell°Al'In''l 6TP:irtpt'etrs'in Triptych --4'- ,....., ifii..41111ka„k AS''''''' -- ---:'" 'II II I ; 1 *' ':94 tft,f,66-. . ,-.., -. - . ..... I' , ...,,,,,, IS, 41,Ssw. ! itillis '4'7';'''''''''' ' .... ,,.,. . ;.• ' . ?!0?? .,,'Irlifikii,,,k,,,a11,,,•,•4tifitiiiika.„--- ---------- 4 ,,,, -11 ' 141 4* I I ,,Y' 1;:;;:z,-,,.,'",':',.»Tz, i141,"\\'11 ''*'., i ! „, 1, , , , ‘ -4;.--...'N' i 1 t .... tt..-',64-'---. ,-- .,, 1 , If 'C'.- t.."4-14 .,,, ,,,, ' '' ''.'.• ' 4; i -, •=1`‘'' ` n'_;,4r7- ; 7''',..„1,.:::::.::-..,..!SI--..,„: = ,- ''''' -'-'"-- ,„s* I : 1 -if - . — '' ,. . -,sto , . ... - _. „ . , ciiivi!„,.....g ,.. - .., tRefaii it'',01V2 ,,• * '1:1-';'''''',,''''''''''''' Pre"d'.. j'tV,.V"Iit ild328rtd3f)2/16529S;60F;13''S6F1®°Office5F(°31ird7t*‘46'.!-‘'v71 Ifi'APi " ,. „,i,....„ •: look • Pr el ided.Arch'i,t edz-ure'Engineering, Landiooe„4,,s,.T{:titeet‘orl3 $120 1111111011 ' . , City of of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of ProposipnaggeFir2m4 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE D Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm BROOKS I SCARPA BROOKS + SCARPA (formerly Pugh + Scarpa) 4671 W SLAVSON AVE Profile LOSANGELESCAaaou Brooks + Scarpa has redefined the role of the architect and results in some of the most remarkable and exploratory design today. They do so by looking, questioning and reworking they very process of design and building. Each projelpiappeas project an opportunity to rethink the ways thin normally get cone, to redefine and cull-out latent potentials that.mexit in materials, form, construe" an ane : ezt••i filna 'ring ta,as Scarpa says, mat . fie `ordinary extraorditAty=. ""hi`°produces entirely i . ent'`ive work that is quite dif:'cult to categorize` e ause it is driven by explo a an rather than an I1initial intent. It is envv °ro mentally sustainable, but not about `sustainable d • It employs new materials, digital practic-;; and technologies, but is not defined by nor m4 ded by technologies. It is socially and community cons , c o , but;;, it is not created as a politically correct k, statement. Rather, it is deeply rooted in conditions of the everyday, and works with our perception and preconceptions to allow us to see things in new ways' Over the last ten years, has received more than 50 major design awards, notably 18 National AIA Awards including the 2010 AIA Architecture Firm Award and 2'07.0 AIA ,Cal fornia Council Firm of the Year Award, five AIA Committee on the Environment "Top Ten Green Project" awards, Record Houses, Record Interiors, and the Rudy Bruner Prize. Their work has been exhibited in museums worldwide including MOCA Los Angeles, the National Building Museum in Washington, DC and the Gwangju Bienale. They have also been featured in Newsweek and appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show. Brooks + Scarpa is a collective of architects,; designers and creative thinkers dedicated to enhancing the human experience. Honored with the 2014 Smithsonian Cooper- Hewitt National Design Award, the firm is a multi- disciplinary practice that includes architecture, landscape architecture, planning, environmental design, materials research, graphic, furniture and interior design services that produces innovative, sustainable iconic buildings and urban environments. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 25 IIESMAN Design Management BROOKS ! Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm SCARPA i k. t ° '' v - s�. a `ter s _ . a ss ill, ,. .71 j ,x �t:f# ; . x 10 'i,1 illiiiiiiiiilifilitiiiiiiii , ,„., . „.. ., - . ;' Sri. , ,t<. .. .d:.., , 0�' ors t r ''. �. ..1 'tea, ,i .----' �3. Angle Lake Station The Sound Transit Link lightrail is opening a new station Parking Garage near Angle Lake and 200th Street,and Brooks+Scarpa SeaTac,Washington was commissioned to design the station's new Parking Garage. This 1,015 car garage set into a hillside site, also features a large public plaza and multi-tenant retail space. The City of SeaTac called for a public space for the City,not just a transit plaza,with public art. Brooks+Scarpa is working closely with a local artist to integrate her artwork with the architecture. Our team also analyzed and provided recommendations for the adjacent site for future Transit Oriented Development. The future use will likely demand adoption of several levels of the 7-floor parking garage. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 26 DESMA1 Design Management BROOKS+ Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm SCARPA • • ... ... . .:... , .T • • ±r- ,fig uyg w.4 .. _ _ • mpageotomoob 1111111111011•••••0111111•11. _ A , Santa Monica Brooks+Scarpa was commissioned to design Parking Garages improvements to the Frank Gehry-designed #1-8 2000 car garages at Santa Monica Place Mall. Santa Monica,California The team also rehabbed almost 6000 other parking spaces in eight other city owned parking structures that surround the popular destination of 3rd Street Promenade of Santa Monica. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 27 Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications o Pro osin Firm BOO I of 7 C� scARPA I '''';''S ;'..:!, IiiNi;','..z ilk ) i:''.,,,,•. ., `t.'''''', ,, .. ,,,,;..mir,,,, ,,.,,,# ,„,- ,,,,k1...c...°:>,...:. ..+...... = . _ ,...,.-.--;•.,...,ti:'- -, f.,,,4 ,,,,i .1,..,044**.e , ,_ S if..., ,..,„ ',,..,,,, Asa° � � :'*'-‘:;;:::,i': -.VI* itrol,.tii 4:4= '2:1' --=',, , , :,. ,,,,, ,i u � act' . "` Y _ • „ + '.,,,,,,-, 1? „, ,„ ,,',•,,,,,..•:,14$6*,;,.„4: ,=.3.- -- 4,,,,,,., ., ,....,......__ _ /. ,..„. ..,. . , ,„..,,,,,,,,, .... � P , , ~ w .,, :_ . ....., . , .........,,.„ -4. , ' e,,e' a . . w rr I ' X14 UCSD East Campus The design,partially set into the hillside,seamlessly Parking Garage reconciled urbanistic,functional and environmental La Jolla,California concerns and accommodated 1,200 cars on eight levels. Rather than simply sitting on the landscape,the garage is conceived as an extension of the landscape.It is a mediating form,between the natural canyon and the busy urbanity of the campus.This concept is executed by the variation of patterned panels facing each direction—on the canyon side,the panels echo the patchwork of native grasses;on the campus side,the louvered horizontal fins communicate a faster pace, more in tune with the passing pedestrian,bike and motor vehicle traffic. City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED USE PARKING USE Page 28 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm B U I L T F O R M AR C !-1 1 T E C T U R E Built Form, LLC is a midsize architecture firm located in the West Town neighborhood of Chicago. For over ten years, the principals of Built Form have built a practice that combines the creative energies of a small design firm with the technical capabilities of a much larger firm to create an organization that has executed projects of varying scale, type and complexity. These projects include a critically acclaimed men's shelter and work program center on Chicago's west side,several mixed-use developments throughout the Midwest,and a high-technology,LEED certified corporate office building in the desert of Qatar. The firm is founded on an approach that incorporates intensive research into the specifics of each project. In addition to common design parameters such as client stated desires,program requirements,and site restrictions;we bring other important architectural issues to bear on each project. The research into these important issues provides a framework that guides the design of each project and we feel that this process results in the best possible architectural solutions. Through the experience of working on such a wide variety of project types and locations, the firm has developed design processes that ensure a quality project in both design and technical execution.Below is a list of areas for which Built Form,LLC has developed expertise in providing architectural design services: CONSTRUCTION TYPES • New Construction: Full Building Design;Core and Shell;Tenant Build-Out within Existing Shell • Renovation/Adaptive Re-Use: Full Building Design;Core and Shell;Tenant Build-Out within Existing Shell • Historic Structures LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS: • Mixed-Use Developments:Parking,Residential,Office,Retail,Hospitality,Entertainment • Affordable/Senior Housing Facilities • Retail Shopping Centers • Corporate Office Buildings SMALL SCALE COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS: • Tenant Build-Out(large variety of different uses) • Retail Outlots COMMUNITY AND EDUCATION PROJECTS: • Schools-Primary and Secondary Facilities:New Construction and Renovation • Schools—University Facilities:New Construction and Renovation • Community Facilities: New Construction and Renovation • Embassy/State Government Facilities: New Construction MASTER PLANNING PROJECTS: - • Recreation/Entertainment Area Planning • Residential Community Development Planning • Resort Development Planning • City Planning City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 29 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm DRAPER 8 I. ABOUT DRAPER&ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES Draper & Associates (Draper) is a consulting firm focused on formulating and implementing solutions to a wide range of business and management challenges. Stemming from a 40-year history of support to a variety of clients, from construction-related programs to traditional management r support, Draper has evolved into a multi-faceted, problem solving organization. Utilizing the art of analysis and interpretation, Draper has methodically blended the fundamentals of planning, scheduling, budgeting, and program management, to develop a unique project management approach that has been developed, tested, refined and proven on more than 4,000 projects. Contrary to many similar firms who (by their emphasis) believe that project management and scheduling are data processing functions, the Draper approach emphasizes the fact that people manage proiects, not data processing. Because of that belief Draper invests a considerable amount of time developing client-oriented ways to summarize information so that it is understandable and useful to decision makers. As a result of this unique approach -- the blending of the sequence of scheduling with the art of reporting and interpretation -- Draper has found that satisfied clients often provide additional business and opportunities to serve new clients through referrals. The Draper System establishes Project Control by setting up mechanisms to: 1. Provide independent, third party monitoring to allow an unbiased, project-oriented viewpoint to best serve the needs of the project. 2. Schedule all project activities. 3. Monitor the schedule and communicate the status to all project participants. 4. Conduct Project Team Meetings which involve the decision-makers in problem identification and resolution. As a result, major issues are resolved in a timely manner rather than being discovered later in the project, thus adversely affecting time and money. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 30 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm LANLIJ4>/ Corporate Summary Integrated Solutions. Measurable Value. Langan provides an integrated mix of engineering and environmental w consulting services in support of land development projects, corporate '', real estate portfolios, and the oil and gas industry. Our clients include s , developers, property owners, public agencies, corporations, institutions, `_ and energy companies around the world. Founded in 1970, Langan employs nearly 1,000 professionals in its Parsippany,NJ headquarters and among regional offices in: • New York City,NY • San Francisco,CA I ',." • White Plains,NY • Oakland,CA a r - • New Haven,CT • Sacramento,CA * • Trenton,NJ • San Jose,CA • Philadelphia,PA • Irvine,CA • Bethlehem,PA • Cleveland,OH a • Doylestown,PA • Houston,TX • Pittsburgh,PA • Miami,FL i • Bridgeport,WV • Fort Lauderdale,FL • Arlington,VA � Langan International, the firm's wholly owned subsidiary headquartered in New York City,provides all firm services for projects in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean. sva �. Langan International regional locations are in: a i • Abu Dhabi • Athens • Doha r _ • Dubai • Istanbul • London • Panama ,"( Langan's broad range of services includes the following: • Geotechnical Engineering • Landscape Architecture+ • Foundation Design Planning • Site/Civil Engineering • Transportation/Traffic • Environmental Engineering Engineering • Earthquake/Seismic • GIS/Data Management • Surveying Services SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: • 3D Laser Scanning • Asbestos,LBP, Indoor Air ° - Building Information Quality/Mold Consulting V o As the worized industry leader, • \ ``, ` lanpenateemefwsrl25LEE� Modeling(BIM) • Demolition Engineering •`:,me,,•,/, Accredited Pmfessonalspmvides • Natural Resources sustainable solutions for every aspect Assessments&Permitting of your project City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 31 DESMAI Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 1ANSUNG MELBOURNE The Lansing Melbourne Group LLC (LMG) was formed in 2003 in response to the partners' desire to provide detailed,creative products and solutions for our clients in an intimate and manageable environment. As a small firm,the Principals have direct hands-on impact on every project and with every client. LMG is most interested in highly demanding and unique projects located in urban spaces.We specialize in providing boutique, niche services specifically related to public private venture planning, parking economics and project execution. LMG teams with like-minded creative individuals and firms across the country such as Magellan Development,The Carlyle Group,GE Capital, Fortress Investments and public clients to provide state-of-the-art and unique solutions. Partnering and Teaming Opportunities LMG is a boutique-consulting firm that relies heavily on relationships,teaming and collaborating to be successful. We look for opportunities to collaborate with firms that are interested in expanding their options to deliver parking and transportation planning projects through teaming with LMG. We openly share our knowledge and rely upon on our partners to provide the horsepower needed for larger projects. LMG specializes in providing high-level consulting and leverages that expertise with our partners to provide the full breadth of parking and transportation services and financial options to our clients. LMG's approach to parking consulting is rarely focused on parking solutions alone, because parking tends to be a symptom of other issues such as inefficient land use or conversely, highly successful land use development, lack of growth or rapid growth,or simply inefficient use of resources or lack of adequate parking and other infrastructure planning. Successful parking solutions are prepared in concert with users, patients,students,economic development strategies,the local business community, special event and tourism boards, universities,transportation planning, land use planning, local residents and the local and national financial institutions and investment communities. Development of parking solutions requires analytical expertise but also experience gained from networking and interfacing with other communities across the count and in some g g country, cases,across the world. What sets us apart from our peers is what we bring to your project: • unparalleled negotiation skills; • land use development expertise; • hands-on execution and project implementation proficiency; • consensus building skills;and • an understanding of political sensitivities. t t �tlI Ili s,#t b g G.. • = City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 32 DESMAX Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Nic LANSING MELBOURNE The Heights at Eastwood As owner's representative for Lansing Charter Township in the development of the Heights at Eastwood, LMG's role included planning,financial feasibility,representing the township for construction of the 760 space garage,and acting as developer of the Hyatt Place hotel on-site completed in 2015.More recently, the township has added an apartment development to the project. a Li\viC 2420 E.Sunrise Blvd.#90 C: (321)917-6048 Website: lansingmelbournegroup.com Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 0: (954)990-7510 Email: Clay @LMGroup.us City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 33 Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Immo 11 LANSING MELBOURNE Pompano Beach Pier Garage LMG participated in the conceptual design of the Pier Redevelopment on a team led by EDSA and the City's East CRA. Along with RMA,LMG led the entitlement process and public outreach meetings.Subsequently,LMG prepared parking demand projections to determine the appropriate size of the facility along with financial projections to assist in the financing.In 2015 LMG was selected to negotiate the GMP and represent the owner during the construction of the project and all related site improvements for the pier redevelopment area Now in our seventh year of involvement,LMG is serving as owner's representative to the City during the construction of the City's first public garage:slated to open July 4,2016 and has been retained to provide a similar scope for the City's next garage. [Mg 1.1f1 rx nv»:e✓ 04}rw..5wrwlYr 15: tzko .0 ;„,h, , l LNAG 2420 E.Sunrise Blvd.#90 C: (321)917-6048 Website: lansingmelbournegroup.com Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 0: (954)990-7510 Email: Clay @LMGroup.us City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 34 Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm LOUIS.I.AGUIRRE&ASSOCIATES,PA. Consulting Engineers I I R ' } f FIRM PROFILE Over the last 46 years Louis J. Aguirre & Associates, P.A. has established a respected and reliable firm that focuses on responsible engineering, solutions that address client needs, budgets and prompt attentive service as well as emphasize and concern towards the impact of our environment in order for it to prevail for years to come. The firm was established in 1970 and has strengthened into the firm it is today, a complexity of men, minds and machines with a competitive edge and realization to go forth and get the job at hand done while surpassing the many necessary milestones and sometimes complex engineering issues to arrive at the solution. Louis J.Aguirre&Associates, P.A. is committed to developing sustainable designs. As a Member of U.S. Green Building Council since 2004 and with several LEED® Accredited Professionals (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) on staff with more in the process, our firm knows its responsibility to always provide environmentally friendly Mechanical (HVAC & R/ Plumbing) and Electrical designs,with a conscientious effort to minimize initial cost impact by incorporating Energy Modeling and Conservation, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, Facilitation of Sustainable Design Systems and Equipment, Value Engineering practices, Measurement and Verification and Project Commissioning. Our realization is that all future developments will be green and that Owners, Developers, Builders and Buyers will realize that it will not only enhance their well-being but also their facility's operating cost impact in the long run. if Our firm has been the recipient of awards and is also an established minority-business enterprise that has had the privilege to work with outstanding clients in many versatile industry fields throughout the years. Our firm has worked with diverse entities such as educational, healthcare, nursing homes, elderly housing, dental facilities, municipal, multi-use facilities, retail/office suites, parking garage structures, judicial, aviation, fire stations, multi-family low/hi-rise complexes, condominiums, apartment buildings, hospitality, telecommunications, transportation, historical restorations, parks/recreational facilities, shopping centers, marinas, museums and exhibits. Our firm has worked on new constructions, renovations, improvements, building conversions and historical restorations. Our firm has also provided services under the roles of Building Code Compliance Inspectors/Reviewers and Design Criteria Professionals. Our firm has provided designs for the City of Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida Department of Transportation, Miami International Airport, as well as Health Care Facilities such as Jackson Health Systems, Baptist Health of South Florida, this list also includes Miami Dade County Public Schools and School Board of Broward County. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 35 DESMAX Design Management Section 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm Straticon CO MPANY OVERVIEW STRATICON'S HISTORY began over 25 years ago in Michigan. Focusing on excellence in construction with a dedication to customer satisfaction has been the company trademark ever since it's inception. Over the years,Straticon has expanded to complete residential and commercial projects in 28 states. In 2001,with the demand for quality contractors in the South Florida market,Straticon made Florida its permanent home. Straticon values its outstanding employees as key to maintaining company integrity.As a tribute to the corporate culture,a majority of Straticon leadership have 20 plus years of service. OWNERS,JEFF AND CHRIS HARDIN, continually set standards to improve and expand their construction business. One of Straticon's first prominent builds was a highrise in Miami valued at over$60 million.That project was only the beginning of the success and future growth that Straticon would enjoy. Over the next several years, many more multi-million dollar projects were designed and produced,and Straticon has been honored with exclusive awards in the construction industry.Today with over a quarter century of excellence in general construction and 25 million plus of square footage built and renovated,Straticon continues to add value to client's projects in prime markets in Florida. AS A"MASTER BUILDER", Straticon is equipped and equally effective at the undertaking of projects all kinds,sizes and scopes. Our goal is to continue to be selected by those seeking the best in expertise, dedication and integrity. Our body of work demonstrates that we have the expertise and experience to take a project from the design phase through final construction,and to complete it on time and on budget.The strength of our relationships with local suppliers and subcontractor enables us to thoroughly test all costs in the market, resulting in the best quality at the best price. Our dedication to customer satisfaction is proven through the compilation of our repeat customers.As such,we also spend considerable time and energy building the foundation for a company that will prosper for years into the future. STRATICON IS PREPARED to contractually commit key team members to a project.There is an on-site Project Manager and Superintendent assigned to each client and they are 100%dedicated to that one project.These project managers are knowledgeable in local zoning, planning, permitting,fire review and close-out documentation needs,as well as a having a history of successful working relationships within those offices.We offer a fully staffed preconstruction and estimating department that is capable of quickly analyzing plans, providing budget numbers and also providing value engineering suggestions.The end result of Straticon's dedicated team structure is a high-quality product,on schedule and on budget. STRATICON'S LEADERSHIP are committed to a customer-focused and solution-oriented culture. Clients rely on our ability to successfully complete complex construction projects and solve challenges head on.Our leadership helps the entire team understand a construction project from the owner's perspective and strives to improve the process. MOVING INTO THE FUTURE Straticon looks to build lifetime strategic relationships with those clients that entrust Straticon with their construction goals. We look forward to working with YOU City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.1:Qualifications of Proposing Firm DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 36 DEsmil Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team We have selected the talents of our senior staff and principals to head up this in- novative and exciting project. Chris,Tim,and Steve have worked closely together for over twenty years and have completed numerous parking structure design for municipalities, corporations, private, institutional and joint development projects across the country. As such,their communication and organization is seemless al- lowing for quality focus and commitment to your project. In addition to the proposed staff, DESMAN also has more than 100 staff members with the company that all specialize in parking design and planning. This staff size allows us to complete projects on schedule and with superior quality that draws from a national level of expertise. The DESMAN personnel to be assigned to this project have the capacity to complete this project in the timeframe indicated in the RFP. Below is an organization chart of the proposed team for this project fol- lowed by their respective resumes. PRIME WE DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL DESMAN URBAN PLANNING/PROGRAMMING BUILT FORM BROOKS&SCARPA BERM ELLO AIAMIL PARKING CONSULTING DESMAN BERMELLO AJAMIL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESMAN LANGAN ARCHITECTURE(INCLLEED) BUILT FORM BROOKS&SCARPA BERMELLO AJAMIL ' GREEN GARAGE CRITERIA DESMAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DESMAN MEP LOUIS AGUIRRE GEOTECH/CIVIL ENG/ENVN ON MENTAL IANGAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE BERMELLO AJAMIL SURVEY PU UCE LAND SURVEYORS SCHEDULING DRAPER&ASSOC COST ESTIMATING STRATICON City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 37 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team CHRISTIAN R. LUZ, P , AICP Mr. Luz is a Principal with DESMAN and leads their South Florida office. He has a BS in Civil and Environmental Engineering and a MS in Civil Engineering special- izing in Planning. Mr. Luz is also a registered professional engineer, a certified planner and a green garage assessor through the GBCI and USGBC. Some of Mr. Luz's accomplishments follow: • Awarded the Bernard Dutch Award by the National Parking Association for outstanding contributions to the parking industry. • Served on technical committee for the International Transportation Total Years of Experience Institute's original and update of the 2nd edition of Parking 33 Generation Manual. Years at DESMAN • Provided parking and transportation planning expertise on two ULI 6 publications, Ten Principles for Re-inventing Strip Shopping Centers and Ten Principles in Transit-Oriented Development and served as a Education technical consultant for the publication Parking Standards published University of Wisconsin by the American Planning Association. B.S.,Civil and Environmental • Past Chair of the NPA-Parking Consultants Council and was co-author Engineering M.S.,Civil Engineering of Parking Geometrics publication and the Editor-in-Chief for the 4th Edition of The Dimensions of Parking prepared for the NPA and Urban Active Registrations Land Institute. P.E.—Wisconsin AICP—American Institute of Certi- He has extensive experience in the conduct of a wide variety of planning and de- fied Planners sign studies in urban conditions involving all types of parking studies, site stud- Affiliations ies and mixed-use projects. His clients include downtown community colleges, Urban Land Institute Shared Park- universities, corporate and medical campuses, retail centers, shopping malls and ing Special Advisor centers, municipal economic development corporations, institutional and private sector clients, transit agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, including American Planning Association dozens of cities and parking authorities. His leadership,experience and continued PAS Technical Advisor involvement in professional societies and research keep Mr. Luz on top of current Urban Land Institute Smart state-of-the-art traffic and parking practices. Growth Solutions Panel Selected Project Experience—Municipal Parking Planning and Design: IPI Instructor-IPI-Certified • City of Riviera Beach, FL Administrator of Public Parking (GAFF)Program • City of St.Augustine, FL • Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea American Society of Civil Engi- • City of Hollywood, FL neers • City of Pompano Beach, FL • Miami Parking Authority, FL International Parking Institute • City of Oakland Park, FL Project Assignment • Miami Dade County, FL • City of West Palm Beach, FL Project Manager • Milwaukee County,WI • City of Miami Beach, FL • Miami Dade Expressway Authority, FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 38 DESMAI Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team CHRISTIAN R. LUZ, PE,AICP • Downtown Coconut Grove, FL • City of Hialeah, FL • City of Winter Haven, FL • City of Tampa, FL • Charlotte Amalie, USVI • City of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia • City of Putrajaya,Malaysia • City of Shanghai, PRC • City of Dover, NH • City of Charlottesville,VA • City of San Antonio,TX • City of Austin,TX • City of Manchester, NH • City of Charlotte,NC • City of Columbia,SC • Loudoun County,VA • City of Baton Rouge, LA • State of North Carolina • State of Wisconsin • City of Tacoma,WA • City of Sarasota, FL • City of Louisville, KY • Charlotte Amalie, USVI • City of Lansing,MI • City of Milwaukee,WI • City of Janesville,WI • City of Sheboygan,WI • City of Manitowoc,WI • City of Madison,WI • City of Wausau,WI City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 39 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team STEPHEN J. REBORA, RA . . Mr. Rebora has been with DESMAN since 1985. His experience within the architectural field includes Building Design, Project Management and Field Coordination. Through his involvement of parking structure design, he has developed a wide range capabilities pertaining to parking structures. These capabilities include architectural design and document production of exterior facade elements, parking functional planning, site selection, cost estimating, parking demand analysis, revenue control systems,security, lighting,way find- Total Years of Experience ing and value engineering. 29 A partial listing of Mr. Rebora's parking facility projects include: Years at DESMAN • 515 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 29 • Gallery ON Fulton, Grand Rapids, MI Education • Block 38 Mixed Use Development, Lincoln, NE University of Illinois • Somerset North Shopping Center Garage,Troy, MI B.A.,Architectural Design • University of Michigan Palmer Drive Garage,Ann Arbor, MI (5-year degree) • Oakwood North &Southeast Garages, Detroit, MI Minor-History of Art and Archi- tecture • Henry Ford Hospital Underground Garage, Detroit, MI • Galleria Shopping Mall Garages "A" & "B", Richmond Heights, MO Active Registrations • Scottsdale Quarter Mixed-Use Development, Scottsdale,AZ Maryland • Boulevard Mixed-Use Development,St. Louis, MO Arizona Colorado • South Campus Gateway Mixed-Use Development, Columbus, OH Georgia • Argyle Parking Facility, St. Louis, MO Illinois • Rush/Ohio/Wabash Self-Park, Chicago, IL Ohio • Wilson Yard Mixed-Use Development, Chicago, IL Iowa • Nationwide Employee Garage Expansion, Columbus, OH Missouri Texas • Gateway On-Site and Off-Site Garages, Cleveland, OH Utah • Adelbert Road Parking Facility, Cleveland, OH • Washington/Franklin Self-Park, Chicago, IL NCARB • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Lot F-29 Fire Substation Garage (National Council of Architectural Registration Boards • Galleria Shopping Mall Garages"A" & "B", Richmond Heights, MO Green Garage Assessor Affiliations Art Institute of Chicago Cleveland Restoration Society National Parking Association- Parking Consultants Council Project Assignment Principal-In-Charge City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 40 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team TIMOTHY TRACY Mr.Tracy is an Executive Vice President and is involved with and oversees the transportation and parking planning assignments and project management for the firm. Mr. Tracy's experience is in transportation and parking planning and traffic engineering. He has worked on both public and private sector projects for the past fourteen years and has designed and managed a diversified number of projects. Through this involvement, he has developed a wide range of plan- Total Years of Experience ning studies that include feasibility, master planning, traffic impact, parking 29 demand and municipal parking programs. Years at DESMAN Mr. Tracy has been involved in developing parking and transportation mas- 19 ter plans for institutional, corporate, transportation agencies, municipal and Education medical facilities. Through this experience, conceptual and functional plan- NJ Institute of Technology ning techniques have been applied to integrate internal roadway circulation Newark,NJ and access, pedestrian movement and geometrics into short and long-range B.S.Civil Engineering infrastructure improvements and master plans. Previous Experience Storch Associates,Sr.Engineer Additionally, Mr.Tracy has served as Project Manager and Principal-in-Charge (1992-1994) on numerous parking projects ranging from feasibility studies, functional de- Simoff Engineering,Project Man- sign planning to preparation of construction documents. Mr.Tracy is applying ager(1984—1992) his transportation/parking expertise by providing his clients with infrastruc- Affiliations ture improvement programs, operational consulting and master plans. Inst.of Transportation Engineers Mr.Tracy has been involved with countless Municipal Parking Projects through- National Parking Association out the United States.This experience extends to both free standing and mixed- International Parking Institute use projects. He will oversee this project assignment including the preparation of initial design concepts and cost estimates. Mr. Tracy's experience enables him to assume any and all responsibilities as is necessary throughout the du- Project Assignment ration of this project in support of the project team. He will ensure that the Senior Advisor necessary corporate resources are available in the efficient and expeditious completion of these services and in ensuring Client satisfaction. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 41 DESMAI Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team JEROME J. SWANTNER, P.E. Mr. Swantner has been with DESMAN since 1991 and is the Vice President in charge of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Office in McLean, Virginia. As Vice Presi- ,` dent, Mr. Swantner acts as Director of Operations for the office ensuring that the office is properly staffed and that project managers have adequate re- , / sources to complete projects within the expectations of the client. Mr. Swant- }ljr` ner is structural engineer of record of multiple projects and performs design review and final Quality Assurance checks of those projects completed by the p roject managers under his supervision. Since joining DESMAN, Mr. Swantner Total Years of Experience has successfully overseen the completion of numerous parking structure de- 33 sign projects: Years with DESMAN • Prince George Street Garage, Williamsburg,VA 23 • Virginia Tech Parking Structure, Blacksburg VA Education • George Mason University Deck#3, Fairfax,VA Pennsylvania State University • Convocation Center Parking Structure South, Old Dominion University, University Park,PA Norfolk, VA B.S.Architectural Engineering • Camp Allen Parking Deck, Norfolk, VA Active Registrations • INOVA Fairfax Hospital Parking Garages#4&#5 Falls Church, VA Virginia • J. Sargent Reynolds Community College Downtown Parking Deck, Rhode Island Richmond, VA Kentucky • Richmond International Airport North Deck Expansion, Richmond, VA West Virginia Georgia • WMATA Vienna Station Garage#2, Vienna,VA Maryland • Riverside Regional Medical Center Deck, Newport News, VA Washington,DC • Adair Hall Parking Facility, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg,VA Delaware • 14th & Main Street Parking Deck,Virginia DGS, Richmond, VA Vermont • Henrico County Government Center Parking Deck, Richmond,VA Pennsylvania South Carolina • Robert Byrd Intermodal Transportation Center,Wheeling, WV North Carolina • Intermodal Transit Facility, Parkersburg, WV Arkansas • Fairmont State College Parking Facility, Fairmont, WV Nebraska • Yeager Airport Parking Garage, Charleston, WV Kansas Wisconsin • Washington Nationals Ballpark, Washington, DC Mississippi • United States Institute of Peace Headquarters, Washington, DC Indiana • National Harbor Building P, Oxon Hill, MD Missouri • Salisbury University Parking Deck, Salisbury, MD Minnesota • Christiana Care Health Services Parking Deck 2, Wilmington, DE Tennessee NCEES • Obermyer Street(NC A&T U) Parking Deck, Greensboro, NC • Dunbar Street Parking Garage, City of Spartanburg, SC Project Assignment • City Place Parking Garages, West Palm Beach, FL Engineer of Record • VA Outpatient Clinic& Parking Deck, Harlingen,TX City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 42 IIESIIA Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Associate-Traffic Engineer and Parking Analyst Mr Taxman provides project management, parking consulting, and traffic planning services for DESMAN. He is involved with all technical aspects of the planning and management of parking and traffic studies, including data collection supervision, data analysis, and report production. He has also been „ >„At project manager for a variety of traffic and parking study projects. Mr. Taxman has been involved in numerous Transportation Demand Manage- ment(TDM)studies. He assessed a variety of strategies to help reduce parking Total Years of Experience demand in Central Business Districts.He performed parking management stud- 10 ies for the City of Waukegan, Illinois and the Bricktown area in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.This included an analysis of the existing and future parking supply/ Years at DESMAN demand relationship, parking rates,shared parking opportunities, parking site 10 analysis, and recommendations for the management/organization of on and Education off-street parking. He has also performed comprehensive transportation stud- University of Wisconsin ies for the following projects: University Circle area in Cleveland, Ohio, the Madison,Wisconsin downtown area of Leonardtown, Maryland, the downtown area of Rockville, Graduated in Dec.2004 Maryland, and Saadiyat Island in Abu Dhabi, UAE. B.S.in Civil Engineering University of Illinois—Chicago Some of Mr.Taxman's experience includes: Chicago,Illinois Graduated in Aug.2010 Traffic Studies Master of Arts in Real Estate • Veteran Affairs Medical Center—Bay Pines, FL Northwestern University • Boise State University—Boise, ID Evanston,Illinois • Carle Hospital—Champaign, IL Traffic and Transportation Engi- • 505 N. Michigan Ave.—Chicago, IL neering Seminar • Swedish Covenant Hospital—Chicago, IL Licensed Professional Engineer in • Various Traffic Impact Analyses for the City of Chicago, IL Illinois • Kishwaukee Community Hospital—Dekalb, IL • Town of Leonardtown, MD Affiliations • Children's Memorial Hospital—Detroit, MI Member,Institute of Transporta • John Carroll University—Beachwood,OH tion Engineers • Cleveland Clinic—Cleveland, OH Member,American Planning As- • University Circle area—Cleveland, OH sociation • Kent State University—Kent, OH Project Assignment • ICON Center—Dallas,TX Traffic Analyst • Rice University— Houston,TX • St.Joseph Medical Center—Bellingham,WA • Columbia St. Mary's—Milwaukee,WI • West Virginia University—Morgantown,WV • Saadiyat Island—Abu Dhabi, UAE • Dhahran Health Center—Saudi Arabia • Energy City—Doha, Qatar City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 43 DESMAI Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team ERIC HAGGETT Mr. Haggett provides analytical and planning services for DESMAN. Specifically, Mr. Haggett has been involved parking needs analysis, financial feasibility analysis, revenue analysis, and shared use parking analysis. As a certified Green Garage Assessor, Mr. Haggett acted as a consultant to Cornell University during the recent certification of their Forest Home Garage as a Cer- tified Green Garage and is also currently working with California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly), Pomona, which is attempting to earn Green Garage Cer- tification for a new 1,800-space parking facility currently under construction. Total Years of Experience 8 The following are some of the projects Mr. Haggett has worked on with DES- MAN: Years at DESMAN 8 • Cornell University Green Garage Certification, Ithaca, NY Education • California State Polytechnic Univ Green Garage Certification, Pomona, CA Ohio University • Yankee Stadium Parking System Operations Analysis, Bronx Parking Athens,Ohio Development Company, LLC, New York, NY B.B.A.Finance and Economics • Quincy Center Redevelopment Project Parking Demand Study, Quincy, MA Registrations • Veterans Administration Parking Demand Model and Design Guide, U.S. Green Garage Assessor Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Construction and Facilities Management, Nationwide Project Assignment • Nashville Airport Parking Operational Review, Nashville, Tennessee Green Garage Assessor • McGill Univ Health Center Glen Campus, Montreal, Quebec, Canada • Humber River Regional Hospital Parking Study,Toronto, Ontario, Canada • Financial Review of the Long-Term Concession and Lease of the Chicago Metered Parking System, Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners, Chicago, IL • Financial Analysis and Condition Appraisal of the Los Angeles Public Parking System, Los Angeles, CA • Luis Munoz Marin International Airport Parking Demand and Revenue Projection Analysis, Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners, San Juan, PR • Bay Pines VA Medical Center Parking and Traffic Study, Bay Pines, FL City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 44 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team eermella Ajamil&Partrers,Ina: Kirk J. Olney, RLA Landscape Architect Professional Design Experience Mr. Olney is a Registered Florida Landscape Architect with extensive experience in managing landscape architectural and multi-disciplinary design, production and construction projects. Areas of practice include master planning, conceptual and detailed design, the production and management of construction documents, preparation of construction contract documents ik74" and construction services. Management experience includes scope of services preparation and negotiation, office m anagement,scheduling a nd m anaging staff time,t racking utilization and project organization. Mr.Olney also has experience preparing and submitting applications to regulatory agencies and responding to comments accordingly to obtain required permits. His a A special area of interest and expertise is the use of tropical and subtropical plant material. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Utilities Field Services Complex Design/Build,Pompano Beach,Florida-Landscape Architect.Design EDUCATION for the replacement of an existing operations and administration complex for the Utilities Operations Bachelor of Science in Division of the City of Pompano Beach.The project includes the demolition of existing buildings and Landscape Architecture, surrounding supporting structures.The new buildings,designed as a sustainable building under the The Ohio State University, Columbus,Ohio 1995 current version LEED Certification,includes offices,conference rooms,training space,locker rooms, restrooms,storage and shop areas for various work related activities.The project also includes parking areas for staff as well as City vehicles and equipment.Mr.Olney was involved in the preparation of REGISTRATIONS code minimum landscape design,submission of landscape drawings to City of Pompano Beach State of Florida,Registered Boards and Committees for approvals and preparation of landscape construction drawings. Landscape Architect, No 705 North Flagler Parking, Homestead, Florida - Landscape Architect. Responsibilities included Received on November,2000 preparation of construction drawings and construction services for landscape and hardscape improvements for a new parking lot in a downtown urban area. Hillsboro Inlet Park,Pompano Beach,Florida-Activities included site planning;tree relocation plan; preparation of hardscape and landscape construction drawings, and coordination with other design disciplines for a passive park along the Intracoastal waterway with walking path,parking lot, tot lot/playground,boardwalk/pier and restroom facility Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida - Responsibilities included coordination with architect and civil engineer,supervision of junior landscape architect on the design of an entry garden including dry river bed and boulder outcroppings,prepared trellis,column and seat wall construction drawings, prepared landscape plans, prepared speciality paving and furniture specification drawings, prepared parking lot landscape construction drawings. Tony Island Amphitheater Nature Center,Belle Glade,Florida-Assisted City staff during bidding and contractor selection; project included the construction of an amphitheater including seat walls, enhanced parking,landscape and irrigation. Catherine Strong Park,Delray Beach,Florida- Responsible for client review meetings,plant selection and specification;hardscape design,preparation of hardscape details,coordination with other design disciplines,preparation of opinion of probably cost and modifying design to keep proposed improvements within budget and preparation of bidding documents for a ten acre passive and active recreation park with walking path,picnic pavilions,seating,interactive water play,tot lot/ playground,restroom building,parking and landscape. Halpatiokee Regional Park,Martin County,Florida-Responsible for field verification of existing trees; coordination of civil sub-consultant;preparation of tree relocation plans;preparation of hardscape construction drawings including fencing and paving details;preparation of landscape construction drawings;provided construction observation services including supervision of tree relocation for a www.bermelloojamil.com City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 45 DESMAN Design Management LI s Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Berman Ajar it s Partners,Inc.. Randy P. Hollingworth Director of Planning &Landscape Design Studio Professional Design Experience Randy Hollingworth has more than 30 years experience as an urban and landscape designer.His specialty is the design and development of mixed use projects and their integration within the urban fabric.With a comprehensive understanding of the needs and requirements of various land uses,Mr. Hollingworth has prepared development plans for a wide range of project types.He has developed master plans and design guidelines for commercial and retail areas,office parks and residential communities in numerous waterfront locations throughout Florida.In addition to his extensive urban design and planning experience, Mr. Hollingworth has worked on a wide variety of landscape design oriented projects. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Joseph Caleb Center Courthouse and Parking Garage, Miami, Florida-Landscape Architecture Project Manager.Mr.Hollingworth and his team developed the design of all exterior areas of the new court house and adjacent parking structure.A focal point of the design is a large landscaped EDUCATION courtyard designed to provide a pedestrian link between the buildings and a shaded exterior Master of Landscape space for the public and City officials.The landscaping was designed to contribute to the LEED Architecture in Urban Design, requirements for the overall site and is both environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing.The Harvard University,1984 details utilized in the exterior landscaping were specifically selected to reflect the character and Bachelor of Landscape style of the new court house building.These components will then be used to redevelop other areas Architecture,University of of the campus like setting around the City Hall. Guelph,1978 James Archer Smith Park, Homestead, Florida - Project Manager responsible for the landscape design of this underutilized neighborhood park.Since the existing facilities were underutilized and in deteriorated condition,the park was completely redesigned with all new facilities.The new plan features multiple areas for recreation,both passive and active and a new feature in the park,a handicap accessible interactive water feature. Other amenities included additional on street parking,two dog parks,two playgrounds and multiple picnic areas. Wittkop Park Master Plan,Homestead,Florida-Project Manager responsible for the development of a master plan covering the redevelopment of a 2.5 acre park located in the City of Homestead,Florida. The park will include two basketball courts,toddler and pre teen playground areas,two handball courts,a walking trail and restroom facilities. This is the second neighborhood park Mr.Hollingworth has designed within this neighborhood.The first was James Archer Smith Park,already one of the most successful parks in the City. Sullivan Park,Deerfield Beach,Florida-Project Manager.B&A has developed alternative master plan concepts for an existing 3 acre, underutilized waterfront park. With a significant historical background, the site offers an opportunity to educate the residents about the history of their community.A primary goal of the park master plan will be to provide an interpretive program for visitors.The program for the revitalized park includes two playgrounds,restrooms,picnic shelters,an interactive water feature,a 15 foot wide waterfront promenade and a new stair tower to connect the site to the bridge leading over to the City's beach front area. George Brummer Park,Pompano Beach,Florida-Project Manager.Responsible for the conceptual and detail design for a new neighborhood park on the site of a former tennis center.The program was developed utilizing public workshops and numerous meetings with local neighborhood groups. Amenities within the five acre park include;tennis courts,a basketball court,a sand volleyball court, bocce courts, racquetball courts, two playgrounds, an outdoor exercise work out area, public restrooms and passive open space with picnic tables.Located adjacent to a large water retention area and golf course,the site offers one of the few public open spaces within the community for outdoor recreation. NEW www.bermelloajamil.com City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 46 DESMIX Design Management ri i Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Eiermello Ajemii&Partners;Inc. Saul Suarez, RA Architect of Record Professional Experience Saul Suarez has over 40 years of architectural design and construction experience on a wide variety of multifaceted projects. He is particularly adept in the design of parking garages,ports and major cruise line terminals, hospitality, residential and multi-use/commercial facilities and components; projects for which he successfully integrates various forms of transportation, terminal operations, concession spaces and a variety of other uses. He manages multi-disciplinary projects, teams fi and sub-consultants, supervising them from initial design phase through to documentation and construction administration. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Joseph Caleb Center New Courthouse Annex/Additions and New Parking Garage,Miami,Florida -Project Architect.Services are to identify green building strategies for Miami-Dade County's new two-story Courthouse, three-story parking garage and retail located at the Caleb Community EDUCATION Center.Once completed,B&A will seek Silver certification,at a minimum,under the LEED Green Bachelor of Architecture, Building Rating System of the US.Green Building Council New Construction.Mr.Suarez and the University of Florida,1973 Team conducted LEED feasibility report analysis during schematic design and organized charette sessions.The new two story courthouse has approximately 39,000 SF of public,semi-public spaces REGISTRATIONS and private.The new three story parking garage will contain 475 parking spaces and approximately Registered Architect 190,000 SF of constructed area to accommodate parking booths,control gates and approximately State of Florida, 1974 20 private spaces on the ground floor area. Reg.No.6878 Certified General Contractor Filling Station Lofts&Parking Garage,Miami,Florida-Project Architect.Mixed-use development in Florida Construction Industry a unique industrial building.Individual loft units allow residents to create their own space.Eighteen- Licensing Board, 1978 foot-plus ceilings,raw finishes;exposed air ducts,diamond plate interior stairs,concrete floors,block walls,and safety glass supply the backdrop for each unit. Registered Certified General Contractor#013330 Port Everglades,Northport Parking Garage Renovations,Fort Lauderdale,Florida-Project Manager for repair and refurbishment of a 3,000-car parking garage,serving cruise terminals and the Broward County Convention Center,that has undergone successive stages of deterioration. Port of Miami,Cruise Terminals 6/7&Parking Garage,Miami, Florida-Project Manager on a five- person team involved in the schematic design,design development,construction documentation, construction administration and project administration for design and expansion of a new 60,000 square foot passenger terminal/corporate office building and three-level,1,000-car parking garage. Boca Highland Condominium Apartments & Parking Garage, Boca Raton, Florida - Co-Project Manager responsible for preliminary site plan approval and design development phase through construction administration of this 15-story,Y-shaped structure with three lower levels of parking plus attached but separate three-story parking garage with fourth-floor pubic amenities.The 280-unit tower cost$25 million. One Broadway Tower& Parking Garage,Miami, Florida- Project Architect. One Broadway is a premier 36 story apartment complex with a beautifully landscaped public plaza that anchors and buffers the project from an adjacent single-family residential neighborhood and historic Simpson Park. The plaza serves as a true pedestrian destination for tenants and area residents,and will become a restaurant and cafe filled place for lunchtime and evening activity.It stretches throughout the site, and allows the colors,hardscape,and landscape elements to gently embrace Brickell Avenue.The garage fronts on the plaza and as such it was designed to blend into the facade of the residential tower. . www.bermelloajamil.com City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 47 DESMAN Design Management • Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Bermella Ajamil s Partners,Ins: Scott A. Bakos Principal Designer Professional Design Experience Scott Bakos has over 25 years of architectural experience with a variety of project types. His experience includes work on residential and commercial office projects with parking garages, transportation, and maritime/waterfront projects for public and private clients. His responsibilities include developing close working relationships with clients and maintaining involvement with all disciplines of the project. Scott is also Managing Director of our Fort Lauderdale office,overseeing a staff comprised of architects,designers,administrative and support personnel. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: Triptych Mixed-Use Development&Parking Garage -Project Manager(B&A)has been retained to design a mixed-use high-rise consisting of 2 levels of retail,3 levels of office,and the rest consisting EDUCATION of a 20-floor hotel nestled between Midtown and the Design District in Miami.The retail portion of Bachelor of Architecture, the development is approximately 40,000-SF,office is about 40,000-SF.The building will also house a Syracuse University,1991 state-of-the-art mechanized parking system. Filling Station Lofts& Parking Garage, Miami, Florida - Project Manager and Principal Designer. Mixed-use development in a unique industrial building.Individual loft units allow residents to create their own space.Eighteen-foot-plus ceilings,raw finishes;exposed air ducts,diamond plate interior stairs,concrete floors,block walls,and safety glass supply the backdrop for each unit. Premiere Towers&Parking Garage,Miami,Florida-Project Manager and Principal Designer. Two 53-story towers offer breathtaking views of Miami Each unit offers glass balcony railings and use of contemporary materials and a minimalist design.Features and amenities include lavish appointments and state-of-the-art technology. Eclipse Towers&Parking Garage,Fort Lauderdale,Florida-Project Manager and Principal Designer. Two modem residential towers,a 28 stories tower with 176 units and a 15 stories tower with 108 units, totaling 284 units.Both towers rise above a 5 level parking garage containing 630 parking spaces. Backyard Parking Garage,Bar Harbor,Maine-Principal Designer for a 4 story,371 parking garage within the heart of downtown Bar Harbor Maine to help alleviate the parking demands during the high tourist summer season. San Souci Hotel& Parking Garage,Dania Beach, Florida-Project Manager for a new(12)twelve story hotel.The property was previously the site of the original San Souci Hotel,now permanently closed and will eventual be demolished.Project consists of a total of 240 guestrooms and a 3-level parking garage. Oasis Development&Parking Garage,Hallandale Beach,Florida-Principal Designer for a 27 story high-rise 250 unit apartment towers located on Hallandale Beach Boulevard.The development also has a parking garage with 980 spaces. Four Seasons Hotel Tower&Parking Garage,Miami,Florida-The tallest structure in the Southeastem United States,Miami's first true mixed-use urban residential building.Integrates a five-star hotel with luxury residential condominiums,timeshare units,a fitness facility,and Class A office space,into a 64 story concrete frame as a landmark destination. N.E.2nd Street&Parking Garage,Fort Lauderdale,Florida-Project Manager and Principal Designer. Sleek,modem tower is fully integrated into a base containing 236 parking spaces,recreation deck, loft units and commercial and retail space. • Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department Headquarters Facility& Parking Garage, Miami, Florida • Homestead Motorsports Complex&Parking Garage,Homestead,Florida • Brickell Commons&Parking Garage,Miami,Florida www.bermelloajamil.com City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 48 ocs mix Design Management BROOKS + Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team SCARPA Jeffrey Huber AIA, LEED AP, Principal- Director of Planning and Urban Design . Huber was previously the Assistant Director of the University of Arkansas Community Design Center,an internationally recognized outreach center of the Fay Jones School of Architecture.He has also previously worked in Miami for Zyscovich Architects,Inc.and Howard Davis Associates Architects,P.A.in Saint Augustine. Huber is currently on the faculty at Florida Atlantic Uninversity,College for Design and Social Inquiry.He has recieved more than$1 million in Federal,State and local grants for his planning research and interdisciplinary ecological, 1 Jeff Huber,AIA,is a Principal and Director landscape and urban design work.Grants have of Planning and Urban Design at Brooks+Scarpa. included The National Endowment of the Arts, Jeff also manages the South Florida office. National Oceanic&Atmospheric Administration His work focuses on interdisciplinary (NOAA),The Kellogg Foundation and the United public projects that combine ecological,landscape, States Environmental Protection Agency,to name urban,and architectural design. a few. Huber has advanced sustainability educational and professional initiatives in agricultural urbanism.green school design. missing-middle housing typologies.Transit- Oriented Development and Low Impact Development. Huber's research,teaching,and design work have garnered numerous national awards, including multiple Progressive Architecture Awards, National Institute Honor Awards in Urban Design from the The American Institute of Architects(AIA), LICENSED BOARD MEMBER AFFILIATE The American Society of Landscape Architects ARCHITECT Advisory nability MEMBER y p Florida, Advisory Board American (ASLA),American Architecture Awards and the AR95504 City of Ft. Society of American Collegiate Schools of Architecture(ACSA). Arkansas, Lauderdale Landscape 4541 Architects His professional work has been published NCARB Ce rtified Built in hundreds of books and periodicals including Environment Architect Magazine,Residential Architect,and EDUCATION Subcommittee, Architectural Record.Huber has taught at the Master of a County Climate g Architecture Climate e Change University of Florida,Mississippi State University, University of Task Force University of Southern California and University of Florida MEMBER Arkansas. Bachelor of American Huber has published numerous articles and Design institute of delivered dozens of papers at conferences around University of Architects the world on the topic of landscape urbanism, Florida transportation and other issues regarding planning cities and neighborhoods. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 49 DESMAN Design Management BROOKS + Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team SCARPA Lawrence Scarpa FAIA, Founder and Principal and affordable mixed-use housing in the urban environment.Scarpa is currently a professor on the faculty at the University of Southern California. He has lectured or held academic positions at Harvard University,the University of California at Berkeley,SCI-Arc,University of Michigan,Otis College,the University of Florida,and numerous other institutions.His work have been featured in over 500 national and international publications, and his architecture was recently on display in two separate exhibitions at the National Building Museum in Washington,D.C. Founder and Principal at Brooks+Scarpa, Lawrence Scarpa,FAIA is an award winning architect and urban designer.Recognized internationally for his innovative use of material and environmentally sensitive designs he overseas all design work at Brooks+Scarpa. His approach to architecture.while deeply rooted in the tenets of the modern tradition,also is forging a new path-that the built environment can have a transformative influence on people by providing an environment that engenders creativity and curiosity that itself becomes an instrument of the human experience. A large part of the firms success can be traced to Scarpa's design philosophy,which emphasizes client requirements and user experience above the imposition of any particular LICENSED BOARD MEMBER Co-FOUNDER design.Working carefully to understand the ARCHITECT American A+D.Museum California, Institute of Livable Places, functional and behavioral patterns intrinsic to each C21812, Architects Inc new project and site Scarpa's goal is to produce a Florida, AHDLI structure that leaves a lasting impression on users Aa2227 FELLOW g p Norrth th Carolina, American PEER REVIEW and visitors,heightening their sense of awareness 8534 Institute of PROFESSIONAL and engagement with the environment. Missouri,NCARB Architects Government Scarpa is known for incorporating Certified Services BOARD MEMBER Administration influences as disparate as Egon Schiele,Henry EDUCATION Livable Places (GSA) Moore,and Andy Goldsworthy in his work always Master of Rose United States managing to find extraordinary moments even Architecture Architectural Dept of State University of Fellowship Overseas within the most ordinary requirements and Florida Monterey Design Building materials. Conference Operations Along with his work at Brooks+Scarpa,he BaDesign f is a co-founder of The Affordable Housing Design University of Leadership Institute(AHDLI)and Livable Places, Florida Inc,a non-profit policy and development company dedicated to providing livable,sustainable, City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 50 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team B U I L T F O R M ARDEN D.FREEMAN,AIA A F I C H I T E C T U R E PRINCIPAL As a founding member of Built Form LLC Arden plays a key role in all aspects of ` project design and execution.From initial feasibility and concept design to the execution of projects through design documents and construction,Arden's focus for the past 25 years has been spent developing creative design solutions for projects that provide vibrant communities throughout the world. Arden's experience in designing urban,mixed-use projects with large parking components,including bridging the public and private development sectors, has resulted in a deep appreciation for what makes a community authentic while envisioning their infrastructure needs to support a vibrant future. EDUCATION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Bachelor of Architecture, The Gallery on Fulton Illinois Institute of Technology 1991 Mixed-use public parking facility,15,000 sf retail,54 rental apartments Master of Architecture Grand Rapids,MI Southern California Institute of Technology,2001 The Heights at Eastwood Public parking facility with retail liner and hotel REGISTRATIONS Lansing,MI American Institute of Architects LICENSES Avenue East Florida Mixed-use high-rise with parking facility,retail,133 condominiums North Carolina Chicago,IL Illinois Michigan Skyscape Wisconsin Mixed-use high-rise with public/private parking facility,retail,250 Minnesota condominiums Minneapolis,MN Parish&Church Street Garage Design studies for public mixed-use parking Durham,NC City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 51 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team B U I L T F ❑ R M ROBERT R.BISTRY,AIA,LEED NC+B AR CH € T Er C T U R E PRINCIPAL As a founding member of Built Form LLC Bob plays a key role in all aspects of project design and execution.From initial feasibility and concept design to managing project execution,Bob's focus for the past 25 years has been restoring and creating vibrant urban communities throught the world. Bob's experience in designing urban,mixed-use projects with large parking components,including bridging the public and private development sectors, has resulted in a deep appreciation for what makes a community authentic while envisioning their infrastructure needs to support a vibrant future. EDUCATION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Bachelor of Architecture, Development Finance Initiative* Illinois Institute of Technology 1991 School of Government,UNC Strategic Design Consulting for the city of Wilmington,NC REGISTRATIONS American Institue of Architects 709 Alton Road Mixed-Use parking structure* NCARB 30,000 sf retail,30,000 sf office and 300 parking spaces Urban Land Institute Miami Beach,FL LICENSES The Gallery on Fulton Florida Mixed-use public parking facility,15,000 sf retail,54 rental apartments Illinois Grand Rapids,MI North Carolina The Heights at Eastwood Public parking facility with retail liner and hotel Lansing,MI Parish&Church Street Garage Design studies for public mixed-use parking in Durham,NC City of Kannapolis,Demonstration Project 400 car public parking facility with 25,000 sf retail liner&apartments •Experience with previous design firm City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 52 BEsmAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team DRAPER ASSOCIATES MATTHEW HANDAL Matthew Handal is a Project Consultant at Draper&Associates' (Draper) Ft. Lauderdale office. As a member of the firm's Specialized Construction Services Division, he provides construction scheduling, construction management,and project management services. Mr. Handal's project management experience includes serving in a variety of vital functions involved with hospitality, infrastructure improvements, and commercial development. Draper&Associates Project Consultant EXPERIENCE Mr. Handal's representative project experience includes providing Certification scheduling and program control support for the following projects: OSHA-10 • 321 Ocean(22 units)—Miami Beach, FL Education • 333 Downtown (200 units)—West Palm Beach, FL Florida Atlantic • 7th Ave Transit Apartments(76 units)—Miami, FL University. B.S., Civil • 7th Ave Transit Theater—Miami, FL Engineering • Acqualina Sales Center—Sunny Ilses, FL Years of Experience • Alta Congress(369 units)—Delray, FL Total 4 • Amli Sawgrass—Fort Lauderdale, FL • Aquamar—Fort Lauderdale, FL • Barcelona Apartments(352 units)—Jupiter, FL • Barcelona Commercial Center—Jupiter,FL • Cameron Park II(128 units)—Delray Beach,FL • Camillus House—Miami, FL • Collins Park(117 units)—Miami, FL • Columbus Center(65 units)—Coral Gables,FL • DACRA Design Center—Miami,FL • Dante Fascell(152 units)—Miami, FL • Delray Marketplace—Delray, FL • Four Points by Sheraton(124 units)—Miami, FL • Grand Oaks—Palm City, FL • Joe Moretti(212 units)—Miami, FL • Loftin Place(259 units)—West Palm Beach, FL • Mansions at Acqualina(79 units)—Sunny Isles Beach, FL • Mizner Lakes(548 units)—West Palm Beach, FL • Mount Sinai Medical Center • Oasis on the Bay(500 units)—Miami, FL • Oceana(154 units)—Key Biscayne, FL • Oceana Bal Harbour(154 units)—Bal Harbour,FL • Palmetto Park—Boca Raton, FL • Park Lido Hotel—Miami Beach, FL • Porsche Design Tower(132 units)—Sunny Isles, FL • Ritz Plaza(142 units)—Miami Beach,FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 53 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team AbashuDRAPER S ASSOCIATES J.JAMES JUNGE ,' 1'! Jim Junge is Vice President of Draper & Associates Fort Lauderdale office. As a leader of the firm's Construction Service Division, he is responsible for project scheduling, project planning,strategy development, and claims analysis. Mr. Junge has more than 28 years of experience in project management, scheduling, and claims prevention / analysis on a , 'iii broad spectrum of projects. His experience and insights have proven invaluable to clients,contractors,owners,and investors, in the formulation Draper&Associates of strategies and tactics to structure projects for success in both the Vice President private and public sectors. He is a specialist in large, complex projects and recovery schedules. Education University of Nebraska EXPERIENCE B.S.,Civil Engineering Mr.Junge's representative project experience includes the following: • 1996 Olympic Sponsor Villages • First Baptist Church Years of Experience • 250 North Orange • Florida High Speed Rail Total:30 • 2525 Ponce • Florida Hospital Draper:21 • 321 North • Fontainebleau III • 350 Las Olas • Ft.Lauderdale Airport(Proj 80's) • Abacoa Town Center • Gables Marquis • ACOG/MAOGA Olympic Projects • Georgia Tech Olympic Village • Alinaria • Georgia Tech Student Housing • Aloft—WPB • Grand Bohemian Hotel-Orlando • Alta Congress • Harley Davidson-Sunrise • Arnold Palmer Hospital • Health Central Exp.2000 • Artech-Aventura • Hialeah Racetrack&Casino • Assembly of God • Highland Falls Country Club • Beacon Lakes • Hilton Club Suites-Boca • Boca Hotel Beach Club • Hilton Club Suites-Miramar • Boca Hotel Spa • Hilton Hurricane Charley • Boca Hotel Golf Center • Hilton—Ft Lauderdale Beach • Brickell on the River l&II • Holiday Inn Sun Spree • Broadway Promenade • Hollywood Festival Mat • Broward Co Convention Center • Homeless Assistance Center#2 • Cameron Apartments • Hyatt Place-Omaha,NE • Circle at South • Hyatt Regency-OCCC • Citrus Park Mall • Iglesia Christiana Church • City Palms • Jackson South Hospital • Cobb Theaters(12) • Jade Ocean • Cross County Mall • Lake Sumter Landings • Delray Marketplace • Las Olas Riverfront Mall • Digital Domain-Port St.Lucie • Lighthouse International Worship • Digital Domain Park-Port St.Lucie • Maine General Hospital • Diplomat Hotel&Country Club • Mainstreet at MidTown • Dolphin Mall • Mandarin Oriental Hotel-Miami • Downtown at The Gardens • Mansions at Acqualina • Downtown Dadeland • Martin Co.Public Safety Complex • Edition-Miami Beach • Met One/Met • Fashion Mall • Miami Design District(DACRA) • FAU Innovation Village • Mirasol Celebration City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 54 DESIIAN Design Management 1 /L /: Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team �¢ q g v 10 years in the industry— 10 years with Langan Mr. Carr has ten years of experience in civil engineering projects. His specialization includes site engineering, hydraulics and hydrology, storm Education drainage, water distribution systems and sanitary sewerage(including Low Head Pressure systems,gravity,and pump stations)conveyance design. B.Sc.,Civil Engineering Pennsylvania State University Mr. Carl's experience includes land development design for sites of new Professional Registration commercial and residential development and redevelopment, regulatory permitting processes, and construction support and coordination. A listing Licensed Professional Engineer, of example projects that Mr.Carr has been involved with is provided below. Florida Selected Projects Certifications 40-hour HAZWOPER,OSHA • 1400 Biscayne Boulevard,Miami,FL • 1401 Brickell Avenue—Banco Santander, Miami,FL Nuclear Moisture-Density Gage • 151 at Biscayne Condo,North Miami Beach,FL Certified • Academy Bus Opa Locka,FL Florida Qualified Stormwater • Airport Corporate Center,Miami,FL Management Inspector • ATC-Rehab 410 SE 16th Street,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Aventura Marina Parking Lot Expansion,Aventura,FL • Aventura Office,Miami,FL • Aventura Waterways,Miami,FL • Bella Vista At Lauderdale Lake,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Biomass Power Plant,Port St.Joe,FL • Biomass Power Plant,Tallahassee,FL • Carrabba's-Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale,FL • Cooper City Commerce Park,Cooper City, FL • Everglades Fluff, , Miami,FL • First Baptist Church of Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale,FL • Flagler Station Building 35&36,Miami,FL • Granite Aventura,Miami,FL • Heartland Ranchettes,Okeechobee County,FL • Hilton Cabana,Miami Beach,FL • Homestead AFB Customs Warehouse,Homestead,FL • Homestead Police—Homestead,FL • Landmark at Doral, Miami,FL • Market Square Shopping Center at Tampa Palms,Tampa,FL • Medical Office Building Complex,Lake Mary,FL • Miami Dolphins Water Park,Miami Gardens,FL • Mount Sinai Medical Center,Miami Beach,FL • One Brickell CityCentre,Miami,FL • Port Aventura, Miami,FL • Promenade at Coconut Creek,City of Coconut Creek,FL • SEED Kendall Cottages,Miami,FL • Serena Del Mar Master Planning—Cartagena,Colombia City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 55 DESMAN Design Management LAIVGAN Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team � z 25 years in the industry--9 years with Langan Mr. Pina has more than 25 years of geotechnical engineering, project management, construction materials testing and inspection experience in Education projects throughout Florida, Latin America and the Caribbean. His experience has included site reconnaissance visits for proposal and report B.Sc.Civil Engineering preparation, proposal preparation for geotechnical investigations, Florida Institute of Technology supervision of both field testing, sampling and drilling activities, and preparation of geotechnical recommendation reports for a wide variety of Professional Registration projects. Technical expertise includes: subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, geotechnical analysis and engineering, deep and shallow Professional Engineer in Florida foundation, ground improvement, retaining wall systems, and geotechnical instrumentation monitoring. Projects experience includes: (water and sewer Nuclear Density/Moisture Conter distribution projects, water and wastewater treatment facilities, roadways, Meter Operator Certification highway bridges, transportation tunnels, marinas, sport venue facilities, parks, industrial facilities, low-rise and high-rise structures, and commercial Affiliations developments. His construction materials testing experience includes overseeing technical personnel performing inspection, field testing and Member, American Society of Ci% laboratory testing of concrete,soils,asphalt and other construction materials Engineers(ASCE)-Board Member c for roadways, airports and structures. Mr. Pina has over 10 years of Miami-Dade ASCE since 2006 administrative experience managing a 20 to 50 employee firms. Member, Florida Engineering Sociel (FES) Selected Project Member,ASCE Geo-Institute • 84-in Sewer Force Main and Force Main Tunnel Feasibility Study, Member, American Concrete Institut Miami,FL (ACI)—Board Member of ACI South • Aircraft Maintenance Hangar,Miami,FL Florida Chapter 1995 to 1997 • Allison Island Stormwater Improvements,Miami Beach,FL • Aventura Mall Expansion,Aventura,FL Associate,Underground Construction • Biscayne Beach Club,Miami,FL Association/Society of Minin • Brickell Flatiron,Miami, FL Engineers(UCA/SME) • Brickell World Plaza,Miami,FL • Dadeland Mall Interchange,Miami,FL • Edgewater 23,Miami,FL • Fairmont Turnberry Isle Ocean Resort and Residences,Sunny Isles Beach,FL • FED-EX Distribution Center,Miami,FL • Flagler Station,Miami,FL • Grand Bay Harbor Hotel,Bay Harbor Islands,FL • Gravity Sewer Interceptors,Miami,FL • Grove Isle IV,Miami,FL • Harbour Center,Aventura,FL • Homestead Motorsports Complex,Homestead,FL • Homestead Police-New Station Building,Homestead,FL • Jackson Memorial Hospital Mental Health Facility and Parking Garage,Miami,FL • James Archer Smith Hospital Addition,Homestead,FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 56 DESIIAN Design Management 1%/1. 1t1 ii • Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team • x� 4 28 years in the industry—7 years with Langan Mr. Rodriguez has over 28 years of Civil Engineering experience. He has been the primary point of contact for public and private sector clients for Education projects ranging from Municipal utility improvements, roadway resurfacing and reconstruction, as well as County local and area wide drainage M.Sc.,Environmental Engineering improvements. Mr. Rodriguez has spearheaded the Environmental Florida International University Resource Permit (ERP) and Corp of Engineer Dredge and Fill permitting B.Sc.,Civil Engineering efforts on numerous projects. He is intimately familiar with the Miami-Dade University of Miami Water and Sewer Department(MDWASD)standards and specifications as well as with the permit process through the Miami-Dade County Department Professional Registration of Planning, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs(PERA),the City of Dora! Works Department, the South Florida Water Management District, the Licensed Professional Engineer, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and US Army Corp of Florida Engineers. Selected Projects • 1400 Biscayne Boulevard,Miami,FL • 151 at Biscayne Condo,North Miami,FL • 1800 Club,Miami,FL • Academy Bus Opa Locka,FL • Airport Corporate Center,Miami,FL • ATC-Rehab 410 SE 16th Street,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Aventura Office,North Miami Beach,FL • Aventura Waterways,Miami,FL • Banco Santander Tower,Miami,FL • Bel Aire Drainage Improvements,Miami-Dade County,FL • Bellagio,Miami,FL • Biscayne Beach Club,Miami,FL • Biscayne Gardens Elementary,Miami-Dade County,FL • Blue Lagoon Lake Fill,Miami,FL • Blue Mountain Resort Due Diligence,Blue Mountains,Canada • Broward County Government Center Redevelopment Project,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Brownsville Middle School,Miami-Dade County,FL • City of Dania Comprehensive Drainage Plan,Dania,FL • City of Miami Pavement Rehabilitation,Miami,FL • City of Miami Pavement Rehabilitation,Miami,FL • Compost America Facility,Medley,FL • Continental Hotel,Miami Beach,FL • Country Walk Drainage Improvements,Miami,FL • Cutler Cay,Miami,FL • Diplomat GC,Hallandale Beach,FL • Flagler Station,Miami, FL • Fontainebleau East and West,Miami,FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 57 DESMAN Design Management I1 � Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team 22 years in the industry—10 years with Langan Mr. Spector has 22 years of experience in the environmental and water resources fields. His area of concentration is hydrogeology and he has Education investigating aquifer properties for nearly 200 stormwater drainage well projects. His hydrogeology experience includes looking for sources of water BA..Geology for major development projects in Nicaragua and Colombia. He has CUNY,Hunter College designed and implemented assessments of petroleum and non-petroleum M.S.,Geosciences contaminated groundwater and soil. As a qualified environmental Florida International University professional, he has supervised hundreds of due diligence projects on properties ranging from corner lots to multi-acre agricultural and industrial sites. Professional Registration Mr. Spector's experience includes interpreting seismic data and quality Registered Professional Geologist in FL (No.1999)and AL(No.1093) control,including calibration of seismic interference and real-time monitoring of data collection in the Gulf of Mexico and offshore Brazil. Licensed Environmental Professional (No.161) Selected Projects • Conditional Closure for Arsenic and Dieldrin, Municipal Golf Course, Pompano Beach, FL • Pan Am Tract 1 Soakage Pit,Sediment, and Groundwater Investigation, Miami International Airport, Miami,FL • Reasonable Assurance Investigations and Specific Capacity Testing for Area-Wide Drainage Improvements—Hallandale Beach and Sunny Isles Beach,FL • Methane Gas Mitigation and Monitoring,Ryder Truck Rental,Miami,FL • Engineering Control Plan Design and Conditional Closure, Trademark Metals Recycling,Opa-Locka,FL • Construction Dewatering Monitoring,former Saxony Hotel, Miami Beach, FL • Due Diligence Assessments, Truck Maintenance Facilities, Ryder System,Inc.,Miami,FL • UST System Design/Drainage System Design/Contamination Assessment/Natural Attenuation Monitoring, Ryder Truck Rental, Davie, FL • Tenant Environmental Compliance Audits, Miami International Airport, Miami,FL • Chlorinated Solvent Assessment and Monitoring, Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach,FL • Drill Shaft Permitting for Construction Dewatering, The Marquis, Miami, FL • Soil and Groundwater Remediation during Construction, Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Northwest Cargo Area and West End Cargo Area Assessment and Feasibility Study,Miami International Airport,Miami,FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 58 DESMAN Design Management LAAIGA Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team t. tfrr .. 24 years in the industry—18 years with Langan Mr. Yarina has 24 years of environmental and geological consulting experience in the eastern United States, Nevada, California, and abroad. Education Mr.Yarina is a Senior Associate and Vice President in the Miami office and leads Langan's environmental practice in Florida. His practice includes a M.Sc.,Engineering Geology,1998 national client base that includes Fortune 500 companies, land developers, Drexel University financial institutions, attorneys, and institutional investors. Mr. Yarina has B.S., Earth Science (Geosciences), extensive knowledge working with regulatory agencies in Florida, Georgia, 1992,Pennsylvania State University Nevada and California on issues ranging from tank closures to site assessments to remedial actions. Professional Registration Mr. Yarina's environmental consulting experience includes performing numerous Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and Registered Professional Geologist in groundwater impact studies, development of remedial investigation plans, Pennsylvania (PG 03260-E) and Florida implementation of remedial plans,well and boring installation, groundwater (PGOOOZO77) and soil sampling, construction dewatering, regulatory permitting, and Certified Environmental Manager in performing and analyzing aquifer pump test data using MODFLOW and Nevada(CEM No.2104) other computer modeling software. 40-hour OSHA Health and Safety Mr. Yarina has presented on the subject of Phase I ESAs, All Appropriate Training Certificate Inquiry, and environmental due diligence at the Florida Chamber of INSTEP Licensed Environmental Commerce's Semi-Annual Environmental Permitting Conferences, the Professional(LEP No.73) Florida Brownfield Association's Annual Conference, the Environmental Bankers Association and RTM. Selected Projects • 113 Meridian,Miami Beach,FL • 1155 Collins Avenue,Miami Beach,FL • 135 Ocean Boulevard,Golden Beach, FL • 13th Floor Portfolio,Hillsboro Beach,FL • 16800 Collins Avenue,Sunny Isles Beach,FL • 17th Street Marriott,Miami Beach,FL • AMX Ill—Aventura Mall Expansion,Miami, FL • Art Center South Florida,Miami Beach,FL • Aventura Waterways,Miami,FL • Brickell 13,Miami,FL • Brickell Heights,Miami,FL • Broadstone Cypress Hammocks,Coconut Creek,FL • Broward County Courthouse,Fort Lauderdale,FL • Calder Race Course,Miami Gardens,FL • Centergate at Gratigny,Hialeah,FL • Citgo Delray Beach,Delray Beach,FL • Diplomat GC Engineering Services,Hallandale Beach,FL • Diplomat Sites Due Diligence Services,Hollywood,FL • Doral Muck Characterization,Miami,FL City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 59 IIESMAX Design Management litAkV Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team LANSING M E 5 0 u E CLAYTON FLOTZ ASSOCIATE Education B.A.-Cultural Anthropology,University of South Florida-Tampa,2008 Experience Mr.Flotz is an associate with Lansing Melbourne Group LLC(LMG)and its affiliated companies. He is responsible for project management and execution. He focuses his analysis efforts on the synthesis of parking metrics from a holistic perspective into deliverable revenue projections,project budget tracking/forecasting,and financial models;complementing the firm's well known parking economics practice. Mr.Flotz brings a broad base of experience to bear through widely varied assignments encompassing all aspects of system and project development including planning,financial feasibility,functional design,and operations for multi family,parking and mixed-use projects. He has worked with both public and private clients. His current work effort is focused on helping clients understand the dynamics of pay to park behavior and facilitating the transition from traditional payment methods to wireless and pay by phone technologies. Selected Project Experience • Columbia,SC. Field work for updated Parking Master Plan and market surveys to discover rates and best practices among the city's peer group.Facilitated in the transition from traditional pay to park methods to pay by phone. • Melbourne,FL. Developed options for incorporation of sustainable building components in this mixed use garage/multi family/retail project • Pompano Beach,Fl.Currently serving as owner's representative on the planning and construction of the City's first public iconic garage. • Lansing Township,MI.Acted as owner's representative on the planning and construction of a Hyatt Place hotel. LNG 2420 E.Sunrise Blvd.#90 C: (321)917-6048 Website: lansingmelbournegroup.com Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 0: (954)990-7510 Email: Clay @LMGroup.us City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 60 DESMA1 Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team LANSING M E L B o U R N E PETER FLOTZ,PE,AICP PRINCIPAL 1 Education B.S.—Civil Engineering,University of Wisconsin-Madison,1980 Experience Peter Flotz is Managing Member and Principal of Lansing Melbourne Group LLC(LMG).Mr.Flotz gained over 30 years of experience in the planning,development and parking industry by working on widely varied assignments encompassing all aspects of system and project development.His expertise includes planning, financial feasibility,functional design,management,architectural design,engineering,bidding, construction,and operations for transportation,parking and mixed-use projects.Mr.Flotz's clients have ranged from universities and colleges to private developers,municipalities and institutions. In 1985,Mr.Flotz was instrumental in the redevelopment of Fort Lauderdale Beach,which relocated areas of AlA in order to transform Fort Lauderdale from a Spring Break destination to a sophisticated,tropical community.Later,in 1993,he served on the development staff of the Broward County Convention Center, which included the development of a 3,000-car garage that continues to serve both the convention center and the world class cruise facilities within the complex.The project encompassed multiple negotiations between the developer,Port Everglades and Broward County that covered all aspects of financing,cruise ship operations,port operations,legislation enabling hotel bed taxes,and entitlements to successfully deliver a turn-key public building under budget.More recently,Mr.Flotz has worked with the city of Pompano Beach on the redevelopment of Pompano Beach Pier.Now in his seventh year of involvement,he is currently developing and acting as the owner's representative for the project. Mr.Flotz lives in Coral Ridge with his wife,Deborah,and is very active in the local South Florida community. He sits on the board for Birch State Park,and is an active member of First Baptist Church in Fort Lauderdale. L.MG 2420 E.Sunrise Blvd.#90 C: (321)917-6048 Website: lansingmelbournegroup.com Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 0: (954)990-7510 Email: Clay @LMGroup.us City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 61 IIESIIA \ Design Management 62 LOUIS J. AGUIRRE & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consulting Engineers Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Sergio R.Serrano,P.E.,LEED AP with over 24 years of experience,joined the firm of Louis J. Aguirre and Associates,P.A.in 2005. Since then he has gained an array of experience in the mechanical engineering profession. He has been involved in all phases of the design and :. construction process.As an Associate and Project Manager for Louis J.Aguirre and Associates, ..? P.A.,Mr.Serrano is responsible for client relations,management and coordination,site/facility analysis, researching and implementing the most beneficial Mechanical Design Concepts, :-s project design,contract administration and observation of systems' installation,testing and performance for major projects. 044 a- ; max;I. Mr.Serrano has developed his design and project management skills related to educational, r. commercial and airport facilities. He has performed and supervised Mechanical system tr,,,; assessments for condition, code compliance, problem solving and upgrade. He has also ▪ ,. performed plan reviews and prepared Design Criteria Documents. Mr.Serrano was Project *' Manager and Mechanical Engineer towards the$74 Million dollar parking garage project that ^"'-,r also provided an additional 60,000 sf of retail spaces to serve the much awaited Florida Marlins' --, /.^ ° .' , new ballpark stadium that brought excitement to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties. He is the Project Manager and Mechanical Engineer involved with the master planning and s"a ` I c ,, implementation to the Miami Senior High Restoration, Renovations, Remodeling and New ,_ f 11 Addition project that involved maintaining the school's historical features and integrity while •2 �9 , accentuating new more technically advanced characteristics to the school's surface and ; standards for modern use. It encompassed a 150,000 sf new construction & 252,000 sf a - • . rehabilitation while bringing the school up to codes and standards. The school's face lift and ..y ; rehabilitation occurred while the school remained open throughout the various phases and ,J r - : ;' processes. Additionally,Mr.Serrano was the project manager that provided all the Mechanical , ,itri/4. ;;i , = (HVAC) portions of the master planning documentation and observations of the various campuses and centers for Broward College. He has full comprehension and understanding of the State Requirements for Educational Facilities(SREF),Chapter 235 Florida Statutes,Florida k2 �''',..1"'".':� e�t Building Codes and Public Approvals. , (s '1 , "' REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS FIo�(PE d • Stadium Site Parking, Marlin's new Stadium complex, 4 Parking Garage Structures, 4 „i, 'x4 �1n®` �k..t, �., °!.: Parking Lot Structures and 60,000 sf.retail support spaces—Miami,FL S,, _ '°'''� ' • Areas USA—Tumpike-Pompano,West Palm Beach and Port St Lucie/Ft Pierce Stations-FL • 396 Alhambra,15-story Mixed-Use Development Towers and 8-story parking garage(LEED ED ,, Gold and Silver certification)—Coral Gables,FL :,� ' ' r ,c • Miami Senior High School, Historical Restoration, Renovations, Remodeling and New I ' a( r j• Addition(included a 3-level secured parking garage)—Miami,FL I 'z: ,▪ is - . • YMCA of Greater Miami,New Allapattah Family Branch Facility(included an on-site parking a j structure)—Miami,FL ,*� � $• Bayview Market,Retail Office Spaces and Multi-level Parking Garage—Miami,FL a • The Emerald at Brickell,28-Story Residential High-Rise(induded parking garage facility)—Miami,FL `� r4 ,a • New Doral Charter Elementary School(K-5)included parking surface—Doral,FL ,Seal • Miami Entertainment Center-EUE Screen Gems Facility—Miami,FL I° „��, w • International Polo Club,New Ballroom&Stadium Complex(included parking)—West Palm Beach,FL 'Via, ' ;s , • Athalie Range Park Swimming Pool Improvements—Miami,FL 'y '<"�/ 8 y<. • MIA Mover APM System,Fixed Facilities Construction Services Consultant—Miami,FL •`• ° ° s • American Airlines North Terminal Development-Federal Inspection Services Station-405,000 square `,'`' ° yi feet—Miami International Airport—Miami,FL ?�� , • New K-8 Schools for Miami-Dade County Public Schools (schools include parking lot I 4,..,,,,.:.., ,,..,,,,,,.,„:„ 14 r a& !, structure facilities serving staff,students and parents,LEED Principles and Concepts will x „ --z , followed throughout design development)—Miami,FL r ' ti o Aventura Waterways K-8 Center(State School D,K-8 Prototype) j Mandarin Lakes K-8 Academy(State School DO-1,K-8 Prototype) . Coconut Palm K-8 Academy(State School CC-1,K-8 Prototype) - g° • Arch Creek Elementary School(State School E-1,New K-8) j o Dr.Rolando Espinosa K-8 Center(State School P-1,New K-8) (\� a ' "> o Homestead Middle School(State School TT-1,New K-8) • Gibraltar Private Bank&Trust—Coral Gables and Miami,FL o Downtown Headquarters,Office Renovations ?-.(rOUIS'.1.AGUIRRE&ASSOCIATES,P,A, Consulting Engineers o Coral Gables Headquarters,Office Renovations x•rm , •et1,,,,Q 1e,.y, ,a, o 3'a Floor Renovations,Coral Gables Headquarters I - 1: s , o 4th Floor Renovations,Coral Gables Headquarters „"P, y,- 44 'K r<7 d' S ✓�� City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 62 DESMIX Design Management L.7)441 LOUIS J. AGUIRRE & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consulting Engineers Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Mario Pazos, P.E., LEED AP has over 40 years of experience in the electrical engineering profession, inclusive of electrical design and construction phase inspection for industrial,commercial,educational and residential facilities in Cuba and South Florida. He has particular expertise in the design of power lighting,fire alarms, grounding, lightning and other electrical systems. He has worked on individual projects and consulting contracts involving new construction, additions and � improvements to different types of facilities. Mr.Pazos is familiar with all applicable codes and regulations. ;, c;. As an Associate for Louis J.Aguirre and Associates,P.A.,Mr.Pazos is responsible for j client relations,management and coordination,site/facility analysis,researching and implementing the most beneficial Electrical Design Concepts,project design,contrail administration and observation of systems'installation,testing and performance for %' major projects. He has performed and supervised Electrical system evaluations for "--m r r/ - condition, code compliance, problem solving and upgrade. He has also performed ` `' 'iii!**,,...,,,i1 , plan reviews and prepared Design Criteria Documents. " r s„ ASS*t�A Mr. Pazos is the head Electrical Engineer involved in the design and construction towards the parking garages and structural lots that included an additional 60,000 sf ,m r' of retail spaces for the Marlins Baseball Stadium,a$74 Million dollar project that has , da,♦ •, Z "l F brought excitement for Miami-Dade, Broward and Monroe Counties. Additionally, w p Mr.Pazos has worked in the capacity of project manager for many of our continuing �$ 5 miscellaneous contracts for both City of Miami and higher educational facilities. Some s of most recent work can be seen below: REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS • City of Miami,Stadium Site Parking(Marlin's),4 Parking Garage Structures,4 Parking Lot REG}IS y�• a Structures and 60,000 sf.retail support spaces(LEED•Gold)—Miami,FL Professlo ar • 396 Alhambra,15-story Mixed-Use Development Towers and 8-story parking garage(LEED a, P a 8 - Gold and Silver certification)—Coral Gables,FL r _ • Miami Senior High School, Historical Restoration, Renovations, Remodeling and New ,, • k"N is Addition(included a 3-level secured parking garage)—Miami,FL. : ,, r �• • YMCA of Greater Miami,New Allapattah Family Branch Facility(ncluded an on-site parking U.S.'Fs 6 ' e s J structure)—Miami,FL ; � �fs • Areas USA—Tumpike-Pompano,West Palm Beach and Port St.Lucie/Ft Pierce Stations-FL r n a , �A?iii, • Miami River Marine Terminal,5th Street Marina Improvements—Miami,FL ` {' • North Miami Senior High School(State School BBB-1), Replacement to existing school r� (included a 3-story parking garage)—Miami,FL tr c • Sgt.Joseph Delancy Park Aquatic Center Renovations—Miami,FL +r .� o .°, • Naranja Park Aquatic Center Renovations—Miami,FL �Clrs ' y • Goulds Park Aquatic Center Renovations—Miami,FL ; 1 '�v I ,r • City of Miami,Fire Station No.q 13—Miami,FL J; r „a ' a- • Florida International University,Misc.A/E Contract Services—Miami,FL • Miami Dade College,Misc.A/E Continuous Contract Sery ices—Miami,FL i �� : • Miami Dade College, Professional A/E Services Contract—Miami,FL -•, g r ? 'r 4, • MIA Mover APM System,Fixed Facilities Construction Services Consultant—Miami,FL a • Norwegian Cruise Lines, Buildings 10 & 11 Headquarters and Conference Center a Renovations—Miami,FL e r r ,5 ,.,; i, • Mercedes Benz Body Shop,Renovations-Miami,FL - ' '''9 - • South&Central CBIS/CBRA/BHS Program—Miami,FL �` �, t.."J`g s • MIA Satellite E APM Replacement,Engineering Consultants—Miami,FL i ', fir' ry r ,� /r I • Norwegian Cruise Lines, Buildings 10& 11 Headquarters, Café and Conference Center s Renovations—Miami,FL , 1 A • Design-Build Miami Killian Senior High School,New Three-Story Addition—Miami,FL a • Design-Build Southwest Senior High School,New Three-Story Addition—Miami,FL ,, Er • New K-8 Schools for Miami-Dade County Public Schools (schools include parking lot sa _� � structure facilities serving staff,students and parents,LEED Principles and Concepts will i ,, , i followed throughout design development)—Miami,FL Aventura Waterways K-8 Center(State School D,K-8 Prototype) o Mandarin Lakes K-8 Academy(State School DD-1,K-8 Prototype) LOUIS J.n�uifRnq Engineers t � 1� o Coconut Palm K-8 Academy(State School CC-1,K-8 Prototype) wn.,..••,, K •,t• w„ o Arch Creek Elementary School(State School E-1,New K-8) o Dr.Rolando Espinosa K-8 Center(State School P-1,New K-8) ,3 y �, ''''.4' ✓ .�,� o Homestead Middle School(State School TT-1,New K-8) ! .. y_.. �r i City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 63 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Straticon Mike Jackson President Years With Straticon: 24 Years In Construction:24 B.S. Engineering Michigan State University Project Responsibilities All Straticon staff report to Mr.Jackson. He oversees all projects from the executive level ensuring that the owner objectives are met. He spends most of his time collaborating with corporate staff and field management to provide leadership in operations and also field quality assurance. Experience and Recent Projects Other Projects TRUMP NATIONAL DORAL Trump International,West Palm Beach Miami,FL 450,000 SF,$65,000,000,Structure:concrete masonry units,trusses Versace Mansion,Miami Beach DIGITAL DOMAIN DESIGN STUDIO St.Regis,Plaza, Harbour Port St.Lucie,FL 120,000 SF,$25,000,000,Structure:concrete tilt-up wall Crowne Plaza,Hollywood panels;structural steel column and beam skeleton;composite concrete/ Sian Beach Residences,Hollywood metal deck slabs;extensive YKK system glass curtain wall Floridian National Golf Club,Palm City Club Med Sandpiper Resorts,Port St.Lucie OMPHOYHOTEL Mariner's Key,Lake Park Palm Beach,FL 105,000 SF,$27,000,000,Structure:cast-in-place concrete/ Tiara,Singer Island structural steel/auger cast piles/helical piles Tides,Hollywood Beach PESTANA HOTEL HISTORIC RENOVATION Digital Domain Design Studio,Port St.Lucie Miami Beach,FL,47,000 SF,$7,000,000,Structure:concrete masonry St.Lucie Mets,Port St.Lucie units,trusses Fountains Country Club,Lake Worth Frenchman's Creek,Palm Beach Gardens ALTON POINTE HISTORIC RENOVATION Tides,Hollywood Miami Beach,FL,40,000 SF,$3,500,000,Structure:concrete masonry units The Wave,Miami Beach CRYSTAL LAKE COUNTRY CLUB NEW CLUBHOUSE Deerfield Beach,FL,10,000 SF,$1,500,000,concrete masonry units,trusses Key Experience HARBOUR HOUSE Budget Development Bal Harbour,FL 460,000 SF,$55,000,000.Structure:steel-reinforce cast-in- Building Official Relationship Management place concrete Design Team Management Subcontractor Qualification&Negotiations RESIDENCES Hollywood,FL 680,000 SF,$24,600,000.Structure:post-tension cast-in- place concrete City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 64 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Mmairm Straticon Kevin Feil Senior Estimator Years with Straticon: 2 Years In Construction:15 f' BSC in Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Wisconsin Project Responsibilities As Estimator, Mr Feil provides senior level estimating and bid assembly services. His comprehensive understanding of construction assures the exceptional working knowledge necessary for accurate pricing. Kevin's deep understanding of the Construction Management delivery systems allow him to help clients achieve each projects value and potential. Job Tasks Career Summary • Successfully completed projects ranging from 1-million to 40- million dollars in new-ground up and renovation construction. Estimator,Straticon LLC • Prepared detailed quantity take-off,scopes and cost estimates for 2013-Prwent projects in private and public bids. • Prepared conceptual estimates in Pre-construction Services. Estimator,2EM P P 2011-2012 • Solicited subcontractors'and suppliers'bids and evaluated their scope of work and compliance to the bid drawings and Estimator,Global Infrastructure specifications prior to award. 2010-2011 • Prepared value engineering-alternate estimates and proposals outlining options for cost reductions and savings. Project Lead Tech,Wilson Miller • Prepared bid bond applications,cost summaries and other 2007-2010 documents relevant to the bid package. • Attended pre-bid meetings and inspections,reviewed Career Highlights constructability issues and prepared request for clarifications. • Prepared subcontracts and purchase orders for material and ACI Certified Field Tester equipment usage. • Prepared change order estimates and requisitions. Graduate of Army Core Engineers School of • Prepared time impact analyses,cost summaries and payment Construction Quality Management recommendations in construction litigations. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 2.2:Qualifications of Proposer Team DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 65 DESMAN Design Management Section 2.3 Financial Capacity DESMAN has requested a Supplier Qualification Report from Dun &Bradstreet to be delivered to the Procurement Contact. Below is a receipt of the transaction. dun&brxrdstreet Dun&Bradstreet Csover>ameut Solutions Contractor Management Portal Payment Confirmation Please venty your Supplier Cuirritation order core Pt dens ra rote Order are wart and renew lee End User Lemma aortal's'beak.Uson escapism..Vease dick Me ConbrrP Dutton bconferee. CE1iWI.MC. - S+AP1et ParmtOSaglaacdtP OuUCt-* ri1T<001 VLI6 33 tat IO.ne teal Cate Iet.Yv' Users,LtewwAO wnt Ear serer thence*pee 6 ',. 711M $8raasmast,esC, lF.aCCSW�sewers.DasCONRACTORMIV3 ENT PORTAL larlP),seer de re% rrpltl66W UM ' Apps+:TSwsoot im*dtavna fend lSby nun aaaddreeE w 49411i)br put D48 CONTRACTOR LI I ENTPORE I. MP) Mt up rape Ion**Such ileensalse no rduese.ski-teaslereble.IANed Reese fiWI* sodRtw ctf ItemsseiOn$III1#Ilil b '.ie:'4'44 hen/a to Yft,fCMit<M4.uSsum Nepeererst Nn N..Mcnsles Yea1.S 40Mn Nett <1p4rsdS4 LAO uWf>'Ml**Mt.Pl$,MOwe ttt y4tx en Venq ft**Mt etaasmweeeae wit 1151 3 WOW.ditiajarkx 0O. I how.mod am do steep(to va,:1.4.** AgeeaeM City of Miami Beach, FL Section 2.3:Financial Capabilities DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 66 5/18/2016 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report:DESMAN,INC. 411.& 1 Supplier Qualifier Report DESMAN, INC. Entire Report D-U-N-S® Number 09-367-5544 ®Efi Report W Save HTML Rep Copyright 2016 Dun&Bradstreet-Provided under contract for the exclusive use of Report subscriber 100150009 ATTN: DESMAN, INC. Report Printed:MAY 18 2016 In Date Overview History& ''raducts& ? yments F;ronce � , r•C 7 1I:lgs Opefatsons Service: • •OVERVIEW BUSINESS INFORMATION ® About Business Information Business Information D&B PAYDEX® DESMAN,INC. Summary Analysis DESMAN ASSOCIATES i Risk Score Analysis 49 W 37th St 5th Fl Probability of Ceased New York, NY 10018 Operations/Becoming Inactive This is a headquarters location. "Diversity Bra nch(es) or division(s)exist. NumbeS® 09-367-5544 "Customer Service Number: HISTORY&OPERATIONS • Telephone: 212 686-5360 History Business Reaistration Fax: 212 779-1654 Q D&B Rating: 1R3 Operations Number of employees: 1R is 10 or more Family Linkage Chief executive: JOHN Y FUJIWARA, CHM employees. Composite credit PRODUCTS&SERVICES UNSPSC Year started: 1968 appraisal: 3 is fair. NAICS Employs: 102(23 here) .Jump to: Summary S� Analysis • Section PAYMENTS • History: CLEAR D&B PAYDEX 0 D&B Supplier 1 Payment Summary .Jump to: Finance Section Risk: Payment Details Payment Trends SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK(SER) RATING FINANCE • FOR THIS FIRM : 1 Finance V PUBLIC FILINGS 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 3 1 Judgments Suits High Medium Low Government Activity • • D&B PAYDEX® 0 About D&B PAYDEX® D&B PAYDEX: 79 D&B PAYDEX Key When weighted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 2 days beyond terms. • High risk of late payment (average 30 to 120 days beyond terms) n Q t;o ❑ Medium risk of late payment (average 30 days or less beyond terms) 120 days stew 30 days slow Prompt Anticipates • Low risk of late payment (average prompt to 30+ days sooner) Based on up to 24 months of trade. .Jump to: Payments Section Q D&B Score Interpretation Table SUMMARY ANALYSIS 0 About Summary Analysis 0 D&B Rating: 1R3 Number of employees: 1R indicates 10 or more employees. Composite credit appraisal: 3 is fair. The 1R and 2R ratings categories reflect company size based on the total number of employees for the business.They are assigned to business files that do not contain a current financial statement. In 1R and 2R Ratings, the 2, 3, or 4 credit worthiness indicator is based on analysis by D&B of public filings, trade payments, business age and other important factors. 2 is the highest Composite Credit Appraisal a company not supplying D&B with current financial information can receive. For more information, see the Section 2.3:Financial Capabilities https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportDisplayCmd?langld=-1&storeld=11696 Page 67 5/18/2016 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report:DESMAN,INC. D&B Rating Key. Below is an overview of the company's rating history since 01/01/91: D&B Rating Date Applied 1R3 04/22/08 1R2 03/07/06 1R3 10/28/02 1R2 12/21/00 1R3 10/05/98 1R2 07/21/95 01/01/91 The Summary Analysis section reflects information in D&B's file as of May 16, 2016. RISK SCORE ANALYSIS Q About Risk Score Analysis SER COMMENTARY: - Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this industry. - Proportion of past due balances to total amount owing. - Proportion of slow payment experiences to total number of payment experiences reported. PROBABILITY OF CEASED OPERATIONS/BECOMING INACTIVE SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK RATING: 1 The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S. businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 months. Probability of Supplier Ceased 1.3% (130 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive : Percentage of US business with same SER 13% (1,300 PER 10,000) score: Average Probability of Supplier Ceased 0.48% (48 PER 10,000) Operations/Becoming Inactive : -Average of Businesses in D&B's Supplier Database C] CREDIT DELINQUENCY SCORE: 599 DIVERSITY d About Diversity Minority Owned Business: YES Historically Underutilized Business: N/A Indian Veteran-Owned Business: N/A Ethnicity Classification: Sub Continent Vietnam Veteran Business: N/A Women-Owned Business: N/A Disabled-Owned Business: N/A Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: N/A Historical College Classification: N/A Small Disadvantaged Business: YES Labor surplus area: N/A HUB-Zoned Certified Business: N/A Small Business: YES SBA 8(a) Certified: N/A (2015) CUSTOMER SERVICE If you have questions about this report, please call our Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 from anywhere within the U.S. If you are outside the U.S. contact your local D&B office. ***Additional Decision Support Available *** Additional D&B products, monitoring services and specialized investigations are available to help you evaluate this company or its industry. Call Dun &Bradstreet's Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 from anywhere within the U.S. or visit our website at www.dnb.com. Overview History&Operations Products&Services Payments Finance Public Filinas • Print Entire Report E-mail Report Save HTML Report Order an Investigation Copyright 2016 Dun &Bradstreet- Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 100150009 Section 2.3:Financial Capabilities https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportDisplayCmd?langld=-1&storeld=11696 Page 68 QUALIFICATIONS Architectural/Engineering Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages Miami Beach, FL TAB 3 Approach & Methodology DESMAN Design Management DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology DESMAN Inc. (DESMAN)will be the prime consultant for this contract and provide the necessary project management, administration and coordination required for this assignment. DESMAN will require that all sub-consultants perform their work in accordance with DESMAN's Management Plan.We practice in an open work en- 3 vironment where we foster a team-building environment that promotes close col- laboration to deliver projects creatively and economically. Itti _ = � DESMAN TEAM STRATEGY We believe we have proposed a unique and flexible approach that will serve the City in the best way possible. Although DESMAN is a registered architectural firm 44‘ in Florida,we have included three highly specialized architectural firms on the DES- MAN Team to provide the flexibility to deliver the right solution for any given site: • Built Form Architects. Robert Bistry, AIA, (while with another firm) served as design architect for several high profile projects in the City of Miami Beach including the mixed-use garages proposed at 709 Alton Road and 1212 Lincoln Road, both projects that DESMAN provided parking consulting services as well. In addition, Built Form was the design architect under contract to DESMAN for a highly successful, mixed-use garage constructed for a life-style center for the Township of . Lansing, Michigan. • Bermello Ajamil&Partners. B&A has a long and trusted history in South ` 4 _ Florida as an architectural firm that excels at developing creative design solutions including a significant portfolio in the design of parking structures. B&A has several on-going planning, programming and/ or schematic design parking projects that involve DESMAN support for parking consulting services, including at the Port of Miami,for the Port of Tampa,the City of Bar Harbor, MN and site feasibility evaluations for the Miami Dade Expressway Authority. B&A will also provide landscape architecture services for the DESMAN Team. • Brooks+Scarpa Architects. The team of Brooks+Scarpa and DESMAN were just selected on the high profile expansion project for the Boston Convention and Exposition Center Expansion (BCEC). The planned expansion included design, engineering, layout, and operations of two garages with a combined capacity of 1,500 cars. One of the parking components included a "Future Use" parking facility that included design principles for future reuse for office,residential,lab space or light manufacturing. The Brooks + Scarpa/DESMAN Team was selected for the project from a comprehensive search of renowned design firms conducted by the BCEC for their excellence in design and approach to this challenging and forward thinking venture. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 69 DESMAX Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology Not only are several of the most talented design architects represented on the DES- MAN Team,we are collaborating with Lansing Melbourne Group, LLC(LMG). While DESMAN will lead the majority of the design criteria effort for any given site, LMG will be instrumental in providing post-design and construction oversight services for the Team and City. While acting in a slightly different role, LMG served as the owner's representative for Lansing Township on the mixed-use garage designed by Built Form and DESMAN in Lansing, Michigan. In addition, LMG also served as the owner's representative for the City of Pompano Beach on their new beachside ga- rage. DESMAN and Robert Bistry once again provided consulting services together with LMG in site selection, feasibility and programming for the beachside garage. DESMAN, Built Form and LMG have worked together on planning, programming, design and construction of numerous parking projects over the past ten years. The balance of the DESMAN Team is represented by the most talented engineering, planning, and technical firms in South Florida. The entire DESMAN Team is listed below by their anticipated role. The expertise required for a specific site may vary and not all the roles may be necessary for every site. However, we thought it was important to ensure we had the consulting expertise available if needed. PRIME A/E DESIGN CRITERIA PROFESSIONAL DESMAN URBAN PIANNING/PROGRAMMING BUILT FORM BROOKS&SCARPA BERM ELLO AJAMIL PARKING CONSULTING DESMAN BERM ELLO AJAMIL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESMAN LANGAN ARCHITECTURE(INCA.LEED) BUILT FORM BROOKS&SCARPA BERM ELLO AJAMIL GREEN GARAGE CRITERIA DESMAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DESMAN MEP LOUIS AGUIRRE GEOTECH/CIVIL ENG/ENVIRONMWNTAL LANGAN LAPWSCAPE ARCHITECTURE BERNIELLO AJAMIL i;. SURVEY PUUCE LAND SURVEYORS r.z SCHEDULING DRAPER&ASSOC COST ESTIMATING STRAT CON City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 70 llES1IA \ Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology We believe the flexibility and expertise represented by the DESMAN Team will pro- vide the City with the appropriate expertise required for programming the mixed use potential any of the ten sites whether that's office, commercial, workforce/ other housing,civic/community,retail,or other use This approach also ensures we � ' r r '; avoid potential conflicts of interest if one of the architects on the DESMAN Team is involved in another site PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH DESMAN's commitment to quality is best expressed through our management ap- proach to projects. Independent peer reviews are performed by senior DESMAN personnel for each project phase to ensure the highest technical quality is deliv- ered.Additionally, DESMAN identifies a Principal-in-Charge for each and every proj- ect. The Principal-in-Charge ensures that the necessary manpower is available for the efficient, cost effective and successful completion of the various projects. The Principal-in-Charge will also review all draft and final documents, reports,drawings and recommendations before they are delivered to the City of Miami Beach. Value engineering and creative solutions will be imperative to the overall success of any parking project from a functional, construction and economic perspective. DESMAN's project staff uses the firm's collective knowledge and expertise in de- ', ' '° signing parking improvements to ensure these criteria are not only met, but also - 4 exceeded. DESMAN, through our 40 years of consulting and designing parking im- " provements, continually refines our approach to providing services to incorporate - 3 changing technologies to successfully design, organize and complete projects.The challenges and opportunities that are presented by parking projects in built envi- »7 ronments, especially in historic neighborhoods,warrant a proven design team that r .. has effectively completed similar projects. t Jaw.. . Proper functional design is critical to the success of your project(s) and demands that careful planning be incorporated to fully understand the parking characteris- tics for users of a facility. This is important in determining arrival and departure patterns and volume of patrons using the facility to ensure that access controls, internal circulation and ramping systems supports the needs. We have found the success of a parking facility in a competitive market is driven by convenience and minimizing lost travel time. This in combination with potential requirements of maintaining access to existing adjacent properties will be studied and various alter- natives presented.These alternatives will be analyzed from both a level of service and economic viewpoint. '' 40" 4 Responsibility for project quality(process and product)for this assignment will rest '-.,' with Timothy Tracy who will be the Principal-in-Charge for your project(s). The authority and interrelationship of all personnel who manage, perform, and veri- fy work affecting quality will be documented for this assignment with the City of Miami Beach (the City). Mr. Tracy and key members of the DESMAN Team will be responsible for developing a project plan that identifies the responsibility, scope, City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 71 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology schedule,and budget for each scope activity. Mr.Tracy will also be responsible for modifying project plans as applicable throughout the project life cycle and main- ,, taining all project quality records (project management, technical execution, QA reviews, inspection,testing,and client feedback). DESMAN has assigned an experienced and qualified Project Manager, Christian R. Luz, PE,AICP who will be supported by senior technical staff.Christian manages our office in South Florida and has over 30 years of experience in parking consulting on a broad array of project and client types. He is also a recognized leader in the parking industry, skilled administrator, team leader, both a professional engineer (PE),a certified land use planner(AICP)and a green garage assessor(GBCI/USGBC). Christian will document all organizational and technical interfaces in the project plan. These include,as applicable: • Lead department team members. OOF HOUYWOOD,FLORIDA • Support group leaders. n i"�°"µ • Support department team members. • Sub-consultant or subconsultant Project Manager(s). • City of Miami Beach Project Manager. Project quality, both product and process, are the responsibility of the assigned Principal and Project Manager. Specific project related verification requirements are documented in each Project Plan. The primary objective of each project plan is to facilitate project team coordination and communication in order to assure that „,,,, „k RIP M all products and services meet the City's requirements, at both departmental and policy levels. Design input requirements and reviews are documented in the Project Plan. All de- 1 sign requirements, deliverables and scheduled submissions or milestones are fully communicated and coordinated with the City. This is done to ensure that each design effort conforms to the requirements of the contract. These controls will include the following: • Documentation of project deliverables as agreed with the client; • Establishment of a Project Plan, including project technical reviews and independent in-house reviews as appropriate; Definitions of resources needed for completing the project including roc ) in-house staff, sub-consultants, and subcontractors, inspection and testing equipment; • Documentation of City departmental and Project Manager reviews and comments. Responsibility for the conformance of design output to contractual requirements and generally accepted professional standards rests with the Principal and Project Manager. Design documents will be prepared by various assigned DESMAN Team City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 72 DESMAX Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology members, checked by the Project Manager and approved by the Principal prior to release to the City for review. The Principal-In-Charge and Project Manager will provide all material, equipment ri and personnel resources that this project assignment requires. Their responsibili- ties will include: Aisi ? t" r> • Participating in contract negotiations. 0111 A. • Coordinating the Team disciplines involved for the project. • Insuring that the objectives of the project are achieved. • Formulating, monitoring and maintaining costs, schedules and quality lira I control. , • Direct liaison with the City. • Supervising the progress of the entire Team. • Representing the Project Team at meetings and presentations. • Preparing all status and project reports, reviewing technical formulations and methods of analysis, and quality controlling all drawings, reports and estimates. Changes that occur during design will be identified, documented, reviewed, and reported to the City for approval prior to being implemented. The investigation of alternate design approaches during the initial design process is not considered a design change. A design change is considered to be a change only after the ap- proach is selected and the final design is modified. Design changes are subject to the same level of checking and review as the original design. Only design docu- ments approved for release by the Principal and the City are issued and used on the project. Superseded design documents are marked and retained for information only 4 r Assigned Team Engineers/Architects, both in-house and with our sub-consultants, will be assigned to oversee the development of all technical work under their spe- cific areas of expertise.The Project Manager will coordinate with the City Project Manager to ensure the proper disciplines are assigned to the selected task assign- r1 0.. ment. He will also disseminate City direction and all standards,criteria and proce- dures to the lead Architects/Engineers, who will, in turn, ensure the design team carries out the work in accordance with the project requirements. Lead Engineers/ Architects will coordinate work directly between each design group and their coun- terpart personnel, as required to carry out the assigned design tasks. For consis- tency of product,to facilitate coordination and to simplify communication,we will maintain the same Lead Engineer/Architect on specific site assignments. The Team consultant firms or staff may change depending on the site assignment and the disciplines required for developing the criteria for that site. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 73 BESMA1 Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology QUALITY ASSURANCE Quality assurance is approached as an ongoing process with our team,starting the day the project is awarded. Key elements of our successful approach to quality as- surance include: • Top professionals who have experience with and an understanding of the project type; • Concise definition of the scope of work,task,and deliverables for each discipline established at the commencement of each phase of the project; • Organization of the work through techniques such as critical path variations; , • Established production standards; • Hands-on involvement of the principals throughout the project, to en sure continuity; • Periodic, in-house peer review. The DESMAN Team will establish an in-house oversight and review group. This group will participate in review of each Team members' production and documen- tation standards;will assist in establishing standards for the entire staff;and will re- view all deliverables and documentation at completion points suitable to the City's Project Manager. Upon receiving a specific site task assignment, the DESMAN Project Manager will request that background and available materials for the project for review.We may require the loan of these plans and documents for the duration of the project, al- though non-electronic files may be converted for ease of use and dissemination. DESMAN will review this information to confirm the Preliminary Scope of Work or Program is defined and clearly meets the objectives and deliverables. • • DESMAN will attend, participate and make submittals at progress meetings sched- uled by the City's Project Manager.Data will be submitted for comments as directed by the City's Project Manager and will be approved before the Final Documents are prepared. A Kick-Off Meeting will be held with the City to discuss the Project Intent and Goals, City Standards,Site Data and Scheduling. DESMAN will present a Preliminary Scope of Work/Program and Schedule with target dates and a complete activities checklist with Project Milestones for the approval of the City's Project Manager. Upon review and acceptance by the City, the Preliminary Scope of the Work/Pro- gram will be further defined by the DESMAN Team to: City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 74 DESMAX Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology • Identify the facility's priorities and identify if scope changes and budget adjustments are necessary. I • Present various conceptual schemes for evaluation including budgets and recommendations that will enable preliminary design decisions to be made. • Confirm a general time frame for accomplishing the Project addressing any special conditions that could impact the schedule under each alter native. Upon review and acceptance of the Revised Scope of Work/Program by the City's Project Manager, DESMAN will refine the Scope of Work to identify the disciplines, sub-consultants, and the key personnel required. A Final Scope of Work/Program including the Schedules and Fees for all tasks, phases and design groups will be submitted to the City's Project Manager for approval.Once approval has been ob- tained on the Final Scope of Work, DESMAN will prepare and submit copies of the Final Scope containing descriptive data and graphic justification in support of the recommendations made concerning the facility to the City's Project Manager.Any additional information, documentation or changes requested by the City's Project Manager will be made at that time. When the Scope of Work/Program has been accepted,a copy of the approved Scope will be incorporated into the Contract and kr ,r; ' . represent the standard for this assignment. (V RFQ SCOPE OF WORK i � a As stated in the RFQ, the basic services provided by the DCP Consultant shall in- clude but not be limited to preparation of bidding documents incorporating sche- matic design, performance specifications and design criteria for the Project (the bidding documents shall require compliance with the design criteria by the Design- Build firm awarded this Project) and enforcement of the design criteria including but not limited to notifying the City of regarding the Design-Builder's compliance or non-compliance with the requirements of the design criteria. The following is a restatement and commitment by DESMAN to deliver the required tasks as identified in the RFQ. At the end of each task or subtask listed, we have added the primary DESMAN Team member who will be working with DESMAN on each specific task. There are also several areas within the RFQ Scope listed below, P where we have provided additional information for clarification. This information is shown in underline: Project Initiation Upon selection,the first priority of the DESMAN Team will be to facilitate a Corn- prehensive Interactive Programming Session.We believe the most effective design will come from the combined knowledge and expertise of the collective design team,City and project stakeholders.This work session will unite the entire team on project priorities, challenges and common dialogue. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 75 DES1llA Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology • Meet with City's Project Manager and designated personnel for an interactive work session to review the preliminary program definition and concept development work plan. • Establish the City's goals and objectives. Confirm/review preliminary project budgets and schedules. Confirm/review applicable codes and standards. • Collect and review past studies, concepts, plans and data pertaining to this assignment. • As part of this phase we will try to get a clear understanding of the parking characteristics of the garage users, as well as the type of user associated with the mixed use component of the project. • Establish a clear understanding of the existing site, buildings that may be demolished,structures that remain or proposed structures,or other elements that will be added. • Study the existing physical conditions of the site and the surrounding neighborhood fabric.This also includes an assessment of all current City policies and planning initiatives that may have an impact on the holistic planning process. • Work with the City to understand current thinking and goals for the site and neighborhood, both physically and economically. This could include an understanding and assistance with any ongoing campaigns, public/neighborhood sentiment and political sensitivities. • Refine and update program requirements including mixed use components, parking garage functional design, utility plan, equipment requirements and building systems requirements to prepare final program statement. 1. Schematic The DESMAN Team will become familiar with the Project site and shall provide the City with the following services as part of this task: a. Update the existing topographic survey(Pulice Land Surveyors). b. Provide Geotechnical Soils report(LANGAN). c. Provide Drainage Calculations and preliminary drainage analysis for the proposed stormwater design (LANGAN). d. Review and validate the City's proposed Project schedule and construction phasing plan (DESMAN, Draper, LMG,Straticon). e. Analyze the cost estimates prepared by the City for this Project and provide an updated construction estimate(DESMAN,Straticon). Public Involvement Meeting 1 This would be the first of three workshop/public meetings we recommend for a project like this. At this workshop,the consultant team will present the findings of City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 76 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology our Preliminary Planning.We would also hope to include in the Agenda the follow- ing items: • Project Definition • Goals • Design Philosophy • Schedule • Public Input Preliminary and Concept Drawing Set Massing Solutions and Functional Diagrams will be developed by the DESMAN Team and presented for input and critique. Potential pros and cons for each concept de- veloped will be presented to allow an evaluation and critique of the options ex- plored.We will meet with City's designated personnel/departments to review the design concept sketches(plans and sections),cost model,work plan and schedule. Deliverable drawings will include but not necessarily be limited to,the following: • Ground level • Typical level(s) • Roof level • Mixed use development options • Building section • Isometric flow diagram of parking/vehicular circulation system Preliminary structural design elements will be incorporated into the developed al- ternatives to illustrate such items as bay sizes and expansion joints,which will also help to establish overall building dimensions. The Conceptual Drawing Set will show such elements as building layout and orien- tation,traffic flow and parking layout,exit/entrance lanes,ramping system configu- ration,connections with external streets lots,etc. Public Involvement Meeting 2 A second workshop/public meeting is recommended to present the Conceptual Drawings to the public/neighborhood.We would also hope to include in the Agen- da the following items: • Confirmation of Project Definition&Goals. • Design Philosophy and Process. • Opportunities. • Schedule. • Public Input. 2. Design Criteria Package DESMAN will coordinate with the City,as to the methodology, procedures,format City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 77 IIESMAX Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology and other specifics that the Design Criteria Package shall contain.The Design Crite- ria Professional shall prepare the Design Criteria Package for bidding by incorporat- ing all information as required by the City,and all federal,state,and applicable local codes.The preparation of the design criteria bidding documents shall include, but not be limited to the following: a. Finalize all design criteria for the Project to be utilized by Design-Build firms to bid, design and construct the Project.The design criteria shall include issues related to infrastructure design analysis of the schematic phase design,and performance specifications(DESMAN Team). b. Preparation, coordination and incorporation of all construction related documents, including front-end documents(DESMAN Team). c. Coordination of bidding documents and other related deliverables, to ensure consistency of Design-Build bid documents (DESMAN, Straticon). d. DESMAN will consult with the City in preparation of the design criteria bid documents and shall seek approval from all applicable City staff prior to bidding the Project(DESMAN Team). Preparation of Design/Build Criteria Documents The goal of this phase will be for the DESMAN Team to advance and further develop the preliminary design solutions created in the previous phase. This phase of the project will include; • Advancement of the selected scheme and continue to work with the City on exterior architectural treatments for facade elements and stair towers, proposed floor plans and structural, mechanical, and electrical system requirements. • The building design would be developed to best achieve the goals set forth in the research and program phases.Careful consideration will be given to the historic and design context of the area and collective vision for Miami Beach's future. This research and development is critical in determining the best architectural language for the project. Materiality and scale that relates to the pedestrian at the street interface,to create walkable and comfortable urban environments will be carefully considered. • We shall provide the City with 15 to 20 percent design drawings,outline specifications, and other materials for review and approval. We expect this set of documents will include the following deliverables: - Architectural and Civil Engineering Site Plans; - Code analysis for major requirements will be complete, including a description of any issues to be addressed and possible solutions. - Demonstrate compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and all applicable accessibility standards and requirements. City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 78 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology — Floor plans — layout with key dimensions, grid lines, stairs, conveying systems,sections,elevations,etc.; - Parking Plans; - Roof plans; — Elevations—define openings,finishes,colors,textures, profiles; - Building Sections; - Common areas,such as elevator lobbies,etc.; - Structural Plans will include typical framing layouts including column, beam and girder locations will be provided for each supported level; • Photoshop 2D Color Renderings and Building Modeling will be prepared of the site and garage. We believe the inclusion of Photoshop Color Renderings and Modeled Design Solutions provides a powerful visual tool to help the general public, residents, downtown merchants and City officials better understand the visual and physical changes that are associated with this important infrastructure that will be introduced to the downtown. • We shall submit to the City a preliminary construction cost budget based on project area,volume,or other unit costs. The following is a typical list of the project deliverables and process we would an- ticipate for the development of the Design/Build Criteria Documents for this assign- ment.We would refine the list of deliverables with the City to ensure project goals, schedules and budgets are met. Design/Build Criteria Documents ments • Codes,Standards and References:Code analysis for major requirements will be complete, including a description of significant issues to be ad dressed and proposed solutions. - List of Applicable Codes and Standards: - Provide a detailed listing of all applicable codes,design guidelines, national standards. - Obtain and review any applicable Standards or Guidelines created by,or generated for the City(as Owner). • Code Compliance Summary: Provide a written summary of the code analysis for each applicable code or standard. - Provide information such as: occupancy classification (include primary and incidental occupancies), construction classification, seismic, wind/hurricane design category, bracing requirements, fire protection requirements and systems, egress, exiting and separation requirements,etc. - Any variance request information made to all authorities having jurisdiction,as applicable to the project. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 79 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology - Demonstrate compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)and all applicable accessibility standards and requirements. • Drawings - Specific for each discipline, as applicable; a list of the drawings, general notes, abbreviations, legends, key notes, symbol keys, key plans,column lines, north arrow,and coordinated backgrounds. - The cover sheet and all typical drawings shall include the following: City (Owner) name, address and logo, consultant name(s) and address, client name, project location, project title, project number, sheet name, sheet number, sheet date, drawing scale, graphic scale, revision block and block for seal and signature. - All drawings shall indicate the scale to which they are drawn and shall be appropriate for the specific item being represented. - The drawings shall be appropriately coordinated with all disciplines. • Architectural Drawings - Life safety plans for each existing and added level of the building clearly delineating exiting, egress, fire separation and enclosure requirements,fire ratings of building structural elements and other building construction required to be fire rated including floor and roof construction, occupancy type, and area and number of occupants in each habitable or occupied room. Indicate the maximum travel distance and path of travel for each primary and/ or incidental occupancy shown. - Location Plan showing the project location. - Floor Plans shall include all required spaces,doors,windows,stairs, square footage, planned occupancies, elevators, exits, and major items of fixed equipment,and illustrating reasonable compatibility with routings of mechanical and electrical services. Provide overall dimensions and dimensions of major components. Provide grid lines identified by letter in the horizontal direction and numerals vertically. - Sections - shall include major cuts in two directions for all structures with basic vertical dimensions. Include key dimensions and material indications. - Elevations—shall include key dimensions and material indications. - Existing construction and new construction shall be clearly defined. - Indicate all accessible routes and entrances/exits. • Electrical Drawings - Preliminary one-line diagram for the normal and emergency power distribution systems. - Floor plans. - A site plan showing(as applicable)utility service connection points, routing of services to the building (new and existing), and the City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 80 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology location of major equipment such as switchgear, switchboards, transformers and standby/emergency generators. • Fire Protection Drawings - Piping floor plans for each level: o All risers, mains, and major pieces of equipment shall be located on the floor plans. o Existing services located and sized. - Preliminary sprinkler and/or standpipe systems riser diagrams. - Equipment and material schedules set up. - A site plan showing (as applicable) incoming water service, connection points, routing of services to the building (new and existing). • Plumbing Drawings - Piping floor plans for each level. - All major pieces of equipment shall be located on the floor plans. - Existing services located and sized. - System Schematics. - Flow Diagrams. - Equipment and fixture schedules set up. • Structural Data - Provide a written description of the basic structural systems to be used on the project (foundations, waterproofing, substructure, superstructure, lateral force resisting system, exterior cladding support,etc.). - Software: o List analysis and design software that will be used on the project. - Structural Loading Information including the following: o Floor and roof live load. o Wind load design data. Include basic wind speed, wind importance factor, wind exposure, the applicable internal coefficient and component and cladding design pressure. - Building Performance Design Criteria: o Maximum allowable roof deflection (LL,SL, ponding,etc.). o Floor flatness and levelness numbers. o Maximum allowable vertical and horizontal deflection for members supporting exterior cladding and materials. o Floor vibration criteria. o Floor beam cambering or shoring requirements. • Technical Specifications - Project manual cover sheet. - A complete Table of Contents listing all anticipated sections to be used on the project. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 81 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology - A scope of work description. - A coordinated list of drawings. • Design Build Project Manual Our role during this task would be to assist the City to prepare materials needed to obtain proposals from Design/Build teams to deliver the parking structure.To accomplish this objective,the DESMAN Team will assist with the preparation of Requests for Proposals and Project Manual. We anticipate the RFP/Project Manual could be arranged as follows: - SECTION 1: Purpose of Request. - SECTION 2: Schedule. - SECTION 3: Statement of Qualifications Submission Requirements. - SECTION 4: Statement of Technical Submission Requirements. - SECTION 5: Statement of Pricing Submission Requirements. - SECTION 6: Scope of Work/Technical Specifications. o Project Description o Definition of Work to be included and Code Compliance Requirements o System Requirements o Performance and Operating Criteria o Environmental Requirements o General Design Requirements o Equipment Design Guidelines o Documentation Requirements o Training Requirements o Warranty and Support Requirements - SECTION 7: Proposal Evaluation Process and Evaluation Criteria. - SECTION 8: Contract Requirements and/or Restrictions. - Attachments. Public Involvement Meeting 3 orksho ublic meeting would be to present the Final Schematic Criteria The last w p/p g p Schematic/ Criteria to the public. We would also hope to include in the Agenda the following items: • Confirmation of Project Definition and Goals. • Design Solutions. • Budget. • Schedule. • Public Input 3. Bidding and Award of Contract The DESMAN Team will assist the City during in obtaining the bid and award of the Design-Build contract for the work that was bid pursuant to the Design Criteria Contract documents(DESMAN, LMG). City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 82 BESIIA Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology 4. Design-Builder's Design Phase The DESMAN Team will, at a minimum, monitor the Design-Builder's design phase as follows: a. DESMAN shall instruct the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record to prepare all required drawings utilizing CADD (DESMAN). b. The DESMAN Team shall instruct the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record team of the City's requirements as to the various phases of design and approvals required and/or mandated by the City(DESMAN, LMG). c. Coordinate and monitor the Design-Builder's design phases and recommend approval or disapproval to the City(DESMAN, LMG). d. Respond to all inquiries and evaluate alternatives presented from the Design-Builder for compliance with the bidding documents and possible City approval (DESMAN, LMG). e. Review all Design-Builder's documentation at all phases of design, submit and obtain review comments and subsequent approvals from the City's departments having the authority to review the Project (DESMAN, LMG). 5. Construction Phase DESMAN will ensure and require that the Design-Builders Engineer of Record team provide construction administration of the construction to ascertain compliance with all approved construction documents(DESMAN, LMG). This shall include but not be limited to construction administration of the Design- Build Construction Contract as set forth in City's agreement with DESMAN and in the General Conditions of the Design-Build Construction Contract, unless other- wise provided in City's agreement with DESMAN (DESMAN, LMG). On the basis of on-site observations, DESMAN will keep the City and Design-Builder informed immediately in writing of the progress or lack of progress and quality of the construction work and shall endeavor to guard the City against defects and deficiencies in said work.The appropriate DESMAN Team member shall at all times have access to the work,whether it is in the preparation stage or in progress(DES- MAN, LMG, Draper). The DCP Consultant shall conduct on-site observation visits during the construc- tion of the Project.Compensation for each authorized site visit shall be determined during negotiations at a lump sum cost per visit.The frequency of the on-site visits will be determined by the City's Projects Manager based on the Design-Builder's schedule(DESMAN, LMG, Draper). The DCP Consultant shall prepare a monthly progress report in the format accept- able to the City(DESMAN, LMG). City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 83 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology 6. Design-Builders Submittals The appropriate DESMAN Team members will review and evaluate samples,sched- ules,shop drawings,and other submissions for conformance with the Design Crite- ria and the Design-Build Contract documents. DESMAN will also prepare in a timely manner change order items, including the proper documentation,for the City's re- view and approval. DESMAN will assemble,for transmittal to the City other written items required for the Design-Builder including, but not limited to,shop drawings, guarantees,operation and maintenance manuals,and releases of claim and record documents(DESMAN, LMG, Draper). 7. Quality Control DESMAN will evaluate the materials and/or workmanship for conformance with the Design-Build Contract Documents,evaluate quality control testing reports, ad- vise the Design-Builder and the City immediately of any unacceptable materials and workmanship discovered and ensure that the Design-Builder take appropriate action to remedy unacceptable conditions(DESMAN, LMG). 8. Certification for Payments DESMAN will require that the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record review and ap- prove all requisitions for payment prior to submitting them. DESMAN will review the Design-Builder's notarized requisitions for payment, along with the schedule of values, the Project schedule, and other requirements as noted in the construc- tion contract and shall determine the amounts to be paid to the Design-Builder and shall recommend for City's approval certificates for payments in such amounts. These certificates will constitute a representation to the City that the work has pro- gressed to the point indicated (DESMAN, LMG, Draper,Straticon). 9. Record Drawings Upon completion of construction, DESMAN will coordinate and require that the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record, utilizing record data provided by the Design- Builder along with the Engineer of Record's own record data,revise and update the original working drawings showing all changes made by addenda, substitutions, change orders or field instructions during construction, in accordance with the Design-Build Contract. After original working drawings have been updated by the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record to conform to the record data,and after review and approval of these record drawings has been obtained from DESMAN and the City, DESMAN shall require the Engineer of Record and at the Design-Builder's ex- pense for duplication,to furnish the City these documents pursuant to the Design Build contract(DESMAN, LMG). 10. Substantial Completion Upon notification from the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record that the Project is substantially complete including, but not limited to, the Design Builder's contract and all Regulatory Agency and Life Safety Standards,DESMAN will do the following: City of Miami Beach, FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE Page 84 DESMAN Design Management Section 3 Approach and Methodology Conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of substantial completion for the project. If the project is found substantially complete and in accordance with the Design-Build Contract documents, DESMAN shall then certify that to the best of the their knowledge and professional judgment the Project has been construct- ed in accordance with the Contract Documents, and shall furnish such other cer- tification as required by applicable laws or regulations. If the Project is deemed to be incomplete,the DCP Consultant shall notify the Design-Builder in writing of the deficiencies and shall verify the Design-Builder's correction of the deficiencies, as required,and shall then certify(DESMAN, LMG). 11. Final Completion If DESMAN finds the Project to be complete and acceptable, DESMAN will obtain the City's approval to advise the Contractor of acceptance and commencement of the warranty period (DESMAN, LMG). 12. Project Closeout Upon acceptance of the Project by the City as outlined in the Design Build contract, DESMAN shall immediately commence the closeout of the Project, finalizing all aspects of the construction phase, including: obtaining from the Design-Builder's Engineer of Record all required submittals,such as marked-up record documents, warranties, operating and maintenance manuals, releases of claim; updating and submitting record documents; verifying the Contractor's completion of punch list items; assisting the City with respect to the final inspection by all authorizing ju- risdictions; completing the processing of any remaining contract change orders; evaluating the assessment of liquidated damages, if any, and reviewing and pro- cessing final payments to the contractors(DESMAN, LMG). ti. City of Miami Beach,FL Section 3: Approach and Methodology Page 85 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MIXED-USE PARKING USE ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE REQUIRMENTS APPENDIX E / .:\ I / Ji1: Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2016- 124-KB Architectural and Engineering Services for Design Criteria Professional Services for Mixed-Use Parking Garages PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D - Page 34 t\A I ANAV B EAC H INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability$ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in"insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: _Builders Risk completed value $ .00 _Liquor Liability $ .00 _Fire Legal Liability $ .00 _Protection and Indemnity $ .00 —Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 — XXX 7. Thirty(30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2016-124-KB Appendix D – Page 35