Loading...
2016-4063 Ordinance Off-Street Parking Regulations ORDINANCE NO. 2016-4063 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 130, "OFF-STREET PARKING," ARTICLE V, "FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING PROGRAM," BY AMENDING AND CLARIFYING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDING THAT NO FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE EXISTING PARKING SPACES IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT, IF A REDUCTION IN THE INTENSITY OF USES RESULTS IN A SURPLUS OF PARKING SPACES; PROVIDING CODIFICATION; REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach has the authority to enact laws which promote the public health, safety and general welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach Land Development Regulations ("LDRs") provides for the regulation of land within the City; and WHEREAS, regulation of standards for off-street parking improves the health, safety, and welfare of the City's residents; and WHEREAS, these regulations will accomplish these goals and ensure that the public health, safety and welfare will be preserved in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. That Chapter 130, "OFF-STREET PARKING", is hereby amended, as follows: Chapter 130 - OFF-STREET PARKING ARTICLE V. - FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING PROGRAM Sec. 130-132. - Fee calculation. (a) New construction. The fee in lieu of providing parking for new construction shall be satisfied by a one-time payment at the time of issuance of a building permit per parking space. The amount of such one-time fee is set forth in section 118-7. (b) Existing structures and outdoor cafes. When alteration or rehabilitation of a structure results in an increased parking requirement, or an outdoor cafe is created or expanded, the fee in lieu of providing parking shall be satisfied by one of the following: (1) A one time payment as set forth in subsection (a) of this section. (2) A yearly payment in the amount set forth in 118-7, which shall continue as long as the use exists. (The amount of such payment may vary from year to year in accordance with the determination set forth in subsection (d) of this section.) However, in lieu of continued yearly payments, a one-time redemption payment may be made at any time of the full amount due pursuant to subsection (a) of this section minus the amount of money already paid through yearly payments; such amount shall be based upon the latest determination made pursuant to subsection (d) of this section as of the time of the redemption payment rather than upon the amount which would have been due if the fee had been paid at the time of issuance of the building permit. However, when new floor area is added to the existing building, the fee in lieu shall be as set forth in subsection (a) of this section. (c) Removal of existing parking spaces in a historic district. Whenever an existing required parking space is removed or eliminated for any building that existed prior to October 1, 1993, which are located within the architectural district, a contributing building within a local historic district, or any individually designated historic building, a fee in lieu of providing parking shall be required if a replacement parking space is not provided pursuant to section 130-36. Such fee shall be satisfied as set forth in subsection (b), above. In no case shall the removal of parking spaces result in less than one parking space per residential unit or 50 percent of the required parking for commercial uses. This subsection shall not prohibit the removal of grade level parking spaces located within the front, side street or interior side yards of a lot, should those parking spaces be nonconforming. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an owner shall be permitted to remove parking spaces required for a building in the architectural district or a local historic district constructed after October 1, 1993, if a change in said building results in a net reduction of required parking spaces. No fee in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces, unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required parking spaces. (d) Annual evaluation. The amount determined to be the city's total average cost for land acquisition and construction of one parking space shall be evaluated by the city commission based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI). If determined appropriate, the city commission may amend the fee structure in this section by resolution. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such intention, and, the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word. SECTION 3. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this i1/ day of JeCCni4 2e , .7; /..' / 7/ / ::-/ ATTEST: Philip Le■in.' .,v Mayor ! / 9 /" t- Z4 00 � APPROVED AS TO - Rafae E. Gran do P ,L FORM & LANGUA City Clerk &FO EXECUTIQ First Readi : "' 'November 9, 2016 fe" A., ,/� Second R ing: December 14, 2016 C Attorney Iv/ Dote�, / • '. 4, Verified By: Q gy �6 Planning Director ' AICPf \ • g _ .•#°- - , • • ORATED; I* 1NCORP . r n7CH Z6 .r 0 Underscore denotes new language I�4gm�.��,��� Str+l ough denotes removed language Underscore denotes new language added at 2nd Reading TAGENDA\2016\November\Planning\Off-Street Parking PIF Amendment-First Read ORD.docx Ordinances - RS D MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: December 14, 2016 10:15 a.m. Second Reading Public Hearing SUBJECT: OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 130, "OFF-STREET PARKING,"ARTICLE V, "FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING PROGRAM," BY AMENDING AND CLARIFYING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDING THAT NO FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE EXISTING PARKING SPACES IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT, IF A REDUCTION IN THE INTENSITY OF USES RESULTS IN A SURPLUS OF PARKING SPACES; PROVIDING CODIFICATION; REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the Ordinance. ANALYSIS HISTORY On September 27, 2016, the City Commission adopted a comprehensive amendment to Chapter 130 of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, pertaining to Off-Street Parking Requirements (Item R5A). The subject ordinance was approved at First Reading on July 13, 2016. As part of the discussion on the Ordinance on September 27, 2016, the City Commission referred the following proposed revision to Sec. 130-132, pertaining to the removal of off-street parking spaces, to the Land Use and Development Committee: No fee in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces, unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required parking spaces. On October 26, 2016 the Land Use Committee discussed the aforementioned language and recommended that it be included in the Ordinance, as originally proposed. Since the legislation was adopted on September 27, 2016 without the subject text, a new First and Second Reading Page 557 of 1191 is required in order to include it. BACKGROUND The following is a detailed timeline of the legislation adopted by the City Commission on September 27, 2016: September 10, 2014: The City Commission updated the "Fee in Lieu of Parking" from $35,000 to $40,000 per parking space, in order to reflect changes in property values and consumer price indexes as required by Section 130-132 (d) of the City Code. .In conjunction with this modification, the City Commission referred a discussion item to the Land Use and Development Committee pertaining to the current off-street parking requirements in Chapter 130 of the City Code. December 10. 2014: The item was continued to a date certain of January 21, 2015. January 21. 2015: The Land Use and Development Committee discussed the item and continued it to a date certain of February 18, 2015. The item was moved to May 27, 2015, due to the length of the agendas. May 27. 2015: The Land Use and Development Committee discussed the item and directed the Administration to prepare a draft Ordinance to be presented at the July 29, 2015 LUDC meeting, in accordance with recommendations listed in the administration memo. On July 29. 2015: The Land Use and Development Committee continued the item to the September 9, 2015 meeting. September 9. 2015: The Land Use and Development Committee continued the item to the November 18, 2015 meeting. The November 18, 2015 Land Use and Development Committee meeting was cancelled, as was the December 2, 2015 meeting. January 20, 2016: The item was continued to February 17, 2016. February 17. 2016: The item was continued to a date certain of April 20, 2016. April 20. 2016: The Land Use Committee discussed the proposal and recommended that the City Commission refer the proposed ordinance to the Planning Board for consideration and recommendation. At this meeting, the Land Use Committee considered the following amendment, which was proposed by representatives of the Shore Club property, regarding the removal of parking spaces for historic buildings: Notwithstanding the foregoing, an owner shall be permitted to remove parking spaces Page 558 of 1191 required for a building in the architectural district or a local historic district constructed after October 1, 1993, if a change in said building results in a net reduction of required parking spaces. No fee in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces, unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required parking spaces. This amendment was proposed on the floor, and was discussed as part of the public hearing. It was not part of the draft ordinance, nor was it noted within the Land Use Committee memo. The LUDC, by a separate motion (3-0), recommended that this amendment regarding the removal of parking spaces for historic buildings be included in the ordinance. The administration had no objection to this proposed amendment. May 11. 2016: The City Commission referred the subject ordinance (Item C4G) to the Planning Board for consideration and recommendation. The following is the revised language placed in Sec. 130-132(c) of the referral ordinance, at the direction of the Land Use Committee: Notwithstanding the foregoing, an owner shall be permitted to remove parking spaces required for a building in the architectural district or a local historic district constructed after October 1 1993 if a chan.e in said buildin. results in a net reduction of re.uired •arkin• spaces. No fee in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces. unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required parking spaces. The following text was in the referral memo: The Land Use Committee also recommended that Section 130-132(c) be modified to allow for the removal of parking spaces required for a building in the architectural district or a local historic district constructed after October 1, 1993, if a change in said building results in a net reduction of required parking spaces. The revised language has been included in the attached draft ordinance. June 28. 2016: The Planning Board (by a 5-0 vote) transmitted the proposed ordinance amendment to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation. July 13. 2016: The subject ordinance was approved at First Reading. During the discussion at First Reading, the Commission requested that the Administration provide a current summary of underutilized parking facilities in the City. • September 14,2016: The City Commission considered the proposed ordinance at Second Reading, including the requested list of currently operating underutilized parking lots and structures in the City. The Commission continued action on the ordinance to a date certain of September 27, 2016, in order to have time to review suggested amendments to Sec 130-36 pertaining to off-site Page 559 of 1191 • parking facilities, which were proposed on the floor. These amendments would expand the distance for providing off-site parking facilities, and for changes in use, a 'lease' has been introduced as a connection option, in addition to unity of title and covenant in lieu of unity of title. September 27. 2016: The City Commission adopted the ordinance with the following modifications: Sec. 130-36 Only properties located south of Fifth Street could provide parking within 1500 feet of the property. Sec. 130-132(c) The following sentence was stricken and referred to the Land Use Committee for further discussion: No fee_in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces. unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required.parking spaces. ANALYSIS Under Sec. 130-35 of the City Code, no existing required parking space may be eliminated for any use, except as provided for within subsection 130-132(c). Under Sec. 130-132(c), an existing required parking space may be removed or eliminated for any building that existed prior to October 1, 1993, if such building is located within the architectural district, is a contributing building within a local historic district, or is an individually designated historic building. A fee in lieu of providing is required if replacement parking space is not provided on site. Pursuant to the revised off-street parking ordinance adopted on September 27, 2016, required parking spaces for a building in the architectural district or a local historic district constructed after October 1, 1993, may now also be removed, if a change in said building results in a net reduction of required parking spaces. This amendment does not 'reduce' the number of required spaces, but does allow existing, required spaces, to be removed, if the new use has a lesser parking requirement. Under the amended Ordinance, if an application qualifies for the removal of parking spaces, and spaces were proposed to be removed, a fee in lieu of parking is required for the revised number of required spaces that are not provided. The following sentence was stricken from the adopted ordinance, and is proposed to be re- introduced: No fee in lieu of providing parking or the replacement of parking spaces pursuant to section 130-36 shall be required to remove such spaces, unless the number of parking spaces being removed is greater than the net reduction of required parking spaces. The aforementioned sentence removes the requirement for providing replacement parking or an impact fee for the removal of existing parking spaces, if the removed spaces are less than the Page 560 of 1191 spaces required for the previous, more intense use. This revision creates an incentive for a reduction in density of a project, and would also reduce collateral congestion by reducing the number of vehicles that could park at the site. PLANNING BOARD REVIEW On June 28, 2016, the Planning Board (by a 5-0 vote) transmitted the proposed ordinance amendment to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation. SUMMARY/ UPDATE The subject Ordinance was approved at First Reading on November 9, 2016. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the Ordinance. FINANCIAL INFORMATION In accordance with Charter Section 5.02, which requires that the "City of Miami Beach shall consider the long term economic impact (at least 5 years) of proposed legislative actions," this shall confirm that the City Administration City Administration evaluated the long term economic impact (at least 5 years) of this proposed legislative action. The proposed Ordinance is not expected to have a negative fiscal impact upon the City. Legislative Tracking Planning Sponsor Commissioner Michael Grieco ATTACHMENTS: Description 0 2nd Read Ordinance- Form Approved Page 561 of 1191