406-2002 RDA Reso
RESOLUTION 406-2002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROPRIATING $95,440 FROM
SOUTH POINTE TAX INCREMENT FUNDS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AMONGST THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND WEST SIDE
PARTNERS LIMITED, WITH RESPECT TO UNFORESEEN ADDITIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS IN SSDI-NORTH AND
FURTHER APPROPRIATING $93,600 TO PERFORM REPAIRS TO THE
SEAWALL ALONG SSDI-SOUTH, REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF BAYWALK EASEMENT.
WHEREAS, in November 1995, the City of Miami Beach, the Miami Beach
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and the Portofino Group entered into a Development
Agreement which was terminated in June 1997; and
WHEREAS, in October 1998, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement that
transferred the deed to SSDI-North (which was held in escrow) to West Side Partners,
Limited and sets forth the obligations of the parties with respect to the Development of
SSDI-North and SSDI-South parcels; and
WHEREAS, as part of the Settlement Agreement between the City of Miami Beach,
the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency and West Side Partners Limited, it was
contemplated that West Side Partners would develop the SSDI-North parcel in two stages;
and
WHEREAS, the Developer, The Related Companies (TRG), which is purchasing the
property from West Side Partners, provided notice that it intended to construct the SSDI-
North parcel and to commence construction in September 2001; and
WHEREAS, one of the surviving provisions of the 1995 agreement with Portofino
addresses environmental assessment and remediation of SSDI-North; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.3 (f)(iii), a surviving provision of the Development
Agreement, the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency is responsible for payment of fifty
percent of the environmental assessment and remediation costs associated with SSDI-
North; and
WHEREAS, there are two contamination sites, referred to as NEF-1 and NEF-2 and
located on the SSDI - North property, requiring remediation prior to the initiation of the
foundation work for the Murano Grande development; and
WHEREAS, the areal extent of the contamination was observed to be greater than
originally anticipated, resulting in cost overruns for NEF - 1 and NEF - 2, respectively,
were realized in the amount of $88,240.91 and $102,635.95; and
WHEREAS, the City I RDA is responsible for $44,120.45 and $51,319.48,
respectively, for a total of $95,439.93; and
WHEREAS, as part of the Settlement Agreement, the parties entered into a Grant
of Baywalk Easement that grants the City a permanent and irrevocable non-exclusive
easement along the baywalk; and
WHEREAS, the City / RDA is obligated, at its sole cost and expense, to restore,
maintain, repair and, as required, replace the bulkheads and seawall, in a first class
condition; and
WHEREAS, West Side Partners, Ltd., is obligated to construct the Baywalk, but the
City / RDA has the ongoing obligation to maintain and restore the Baywalk; and
WHEREAS, the City / RDA has separately entered into a Baywalk maintenance and
operating agreement as a result of the City's Fourth Amendment to the Marina lease
agreement; and
WHEREAS, approximately 500 Linear feet of deteriorated seawall must be
rehabilitated per the Settlement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after the initial cleaning was performed, it was observed that small to
medium size holes were present in the sheet piles conforming the seawall, just below the
waterline; and
WHEREAS, it was determined that the most cost effective solution was to repair the
holes on the landward side of the existing sheet piles by excavating the referenced area,
installing a geotextile fabric along the landward side of the existing sheetpile and pouring
a tremie concrete mix simultaneously when the above grade cap I bulkhead is constructed;
and
WHEREAS, the additional costs to address this repair at this time is approximately
$93,600 or approximately $200 per linear foot.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND
MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, $95,440 is hereby
appropriated from South Pointe Tax Increment funds, in accordance with the Settlement
Agreement amongst the City of Miami Beach, the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency,
and West Side Partners Limited, with respect to unforeseen additional environmental
remediation costs in SSDI-North and further, $93,600 is hereby appropriated to perform
repairs to the seawall along SSDI-South, required pursuant to the Amended And Restated
Grant Of Baywalk Easement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 99bh day of January
,2002.
~
Attest:
\\CH2\VOl1\CMGRJAGENOA'l2OO2\tAN0802\DA\ssdI.CMruo.doc
o/-oS-'e
~CouniII ~..
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
~
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Of RDA Appropriating $95,440 From South Pointe TIF, In Accordance With The Settlement
Agreement With West Side Partners Limited, For Unforeseen Additional Environmental Remediation Costs In
SSDI-North And Appropriating $93,600 To Perform Repairs To The Seawall Along SSDI-South, Required
Pursuant To The Amended And Restated Grant Of Baywalk Easement.
Issue:
Environmental clean-up of polluted sites NEF-1 and NEF-2 at SSDI-North parcel required additional
excavation of the contaminated soil, additional testing and analyses, contaminated soil treatment and
disposal, and backfilling of the site with clean soil. Cost overruns were realized in the amount of
$88,240.91 and $102,635.95 for NEF-1 and NEF-2 respectively. The City I RDA shares this expense,
pursuant to the Settlement Agreement with TRG on a 50 % split, therefore, the City I RDA is responsible for
$44,120.45 and $51,319.48, respectively, for a total of $95,439.93.
In addition, approximately 500 Linear feet of deteriorated seawall from the existing Yacht Club south to Pier
L must be rehabilitated per the Settlement Agreement. After the initial cleaning of the sheetpiles conforming
the seawall was performed, it was observed that small to medium size holes were present just below the
waterline. To repair the holes on the landward side of the existing sheet piles by excavating the referenced
area, installing a geotextile fabric along the landward side of the existing sheetpile and pouring a tremie
concrete mix simultaneously when the above grade cap I bulkhead is constructed require and additional
cost at this time of approximately $93,600 or approximately $200 per linear foot.
Item Summary/Recommendation:
Appropriate from South Pointe TIF $95,439.93 for the additional costs of environmental remediation at
SSDI-North and $93,600 for the repair of the seawall at SSDI-South.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Amount to be expended:
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
~B
/-'-0'-
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
http:\\ci.miami-beach.lI.us
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Chairman and Members of the Board
of the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
Jorge M. Gonzalez ~a..
Executive Director
DATE: January 9, 2002
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROPRIATING
$95,440 FROM SOUTH POINTE TAX INCREMENT FUNDS, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AMONGST THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, THE MIAMI BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND WEST SIDE PARTNERS
LIMITED, WITH RESPECT TO UNFORESEEN ADDITIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS IN SSDI-NORTH AND
FURTHER APPROPRIATING $93,600 TO PERFORM REPAIRS TO
THE SEAWALL ALONG SSDI-SOUTH, REQUIRED PURSUANT TO
THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF BAYWALK
EASEMENT.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution.
ANALYSIS:
In November 1995, the City of Miami Beach, the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency
(RDA) and the Portofino Group entered into a Development Agreement which was
terminated in June 1997. In October 1998, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement
that transferred the deed to SSDI-North (which was held in escrow) to West Side Partners,
Limited and sets forth the obligations of the parties with respect to the Development of
SSDI-North and SSDI-South parcels.
As part of the Settlement Agreement between the City of Miami Beach, the Miami Beach
Redevelopment Agency and West Side Partners Limited, it was contemplated that West
Side Partners would develop the SSDI-North parcel in two stages. The Developer, The
Related Companies (TRG), which is purchasing the property from West Side Partners,
provided notice that it intended to construct the SSDI-North parcel and to commence
construction in September 2001.
On June 27, 2001, the Redevelopment Agency approved the appropriation of $3,184,054
to construct various improvements as required by the Settlement Agreement.
Improvements included the SSDI- South seawall repair between the Yacht Club south to
Pier L, environmental remediation at the NEF - 1 and NEF - 2 contamination sites,
January 9, 2002
RDA- Commission Memorandum
Appropriation for Additional Construction Costs at SSDI North and SSDI South
Page 2
construction staging area, temporary curb cut and temporary parking lot facilities. To date,
these improvements have been constructed or are in the process of being constructed.
On July 18, 2001, the Redevelopment Agency approved an additional appropriation of
$2,381,677 to construct various improvements as required by the Settlement Agreement.
Improvements included the SSDI-North new seawall, seawall restoration, storm drainage
relocation and valet parking obligations.
Environmental Remediation
One of the surviving provisions of the 1995 agreement with Portofino addresses
environmental assessment and remediation of SSDI-North. Pursuant to Section 5.3 (f)(iii),
a surviving provision of the Development Agreement, the Miami Beach Redevelopment
Agency is responsible for payment of fifty percent of the environmental assessment and
remediation costs associated with SSDI-North.
In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, on May 17, 2001, West Side Partners
provided written 90-day notice to remediate those contaminated areas on SSDI-North. On
June 6, 2001, the RDA Board approved 50% reimbursement of some initial remediation
work which consisted of the removal of five (5) underground tanks, contaminated soil
excavation, contaminated material disposal, restoration of the parking area due to the tank
removals, and preparation of the Tank Closure Assessment Reports (TCAR) by Nutting
Environmental of Florida.
Additionally, there are two contamination sites located on the SSDI - North property
requiring remediation prior to the initiation of the foundation work for the Murano Grande
development. These sites are referred to as NEF-1 and NEF-2. The work consisted ofthe
following activities:
· Excavation of contaminated soils
· Disposal of the contaminated soils at an approved hazardous waste facility
· Relocation of landscaping trees to accommodate the work effort
· Restoration of the asphalt pavement to restore the existing Marina parking area
Upon excavating the NEF - 1 and NEF - 2 sites, the areal extent of the contamination was
observed to be greater than originally anticipated. Environmental regulations require the
responsible entity to remove, treat and dispose of the contaminated source upon
discovery. In order to verify the extent of on site contamination, field measurements were
taken of the contaminated soil and analyzed as the site was being excavated. This
procedure permitted the on-site professionals to evaluate the extent of contamination and
determine where excavation limits were to cease. The majority of the cost overruns were
experienced in the excavation of the contaminated soil, additional testing and analyses,
contaminated soil treatment and disposal, and backfilling of the site with clean soil. Cost
overruns for NEF - 1 and NEF - 2, respectively, were realized in the amount of
$88,240.91 and $102,635.95. The City I RDA shares this expense, pursuant to the
January 9, 2002
RDA-Comm~$onMemorondum
Appropriation for Additional Construction Costs at SSDI North and SSDI South
Page 3
Settlement Agreement with TRG on a 50 % split, therefore, the City / RDA is responsible
for $44,120.45 and $51,319.48, respectively, for a total of $95,439.93.
A request for No Further Action has been submitted to the environmental agencies in
support of ceasing remedial activities.
Amended and Restated Grant of B~alk Easement
As part of the Settlement Agreement, the parties entered into a Grant of Baywalk
Easement that grants the City a permanent and irrevocable non-exclusive easement along
the baywalk. The City is obligated, at its sole cost and expense, to restore, maintain, repair
and, as required, replace the bulkheads and seawall, in a first class condition. West Side
Partners, Ltd.. is obligated to construct the Baywalk, but the City has the ongoing obligation
to maintain and restore the Baywalk. The City / RDA has separately entered into a
Baywalk maintenance and operating agreement as a result of the City's Fourth
Amendment to the Marina lease agreement.
Seawall Rehabilitation. Approximately 500 linear feet of deteriorated seawall from the
existing Yacht Club south to Pier L must be rehabilitated per the Settlement Agreement.
TRG prepared two (2) alternative designs for the repair of the seawall at this location. The
implemented alternative comprised of a retaining wall anchored to the root of the existing
steel sheetpile. This was a structural solution that brought the bulkhead into compliance
with structural code requirements and would provide a service life of approximately 25
years or more.
One of the first steps that the Contractor must take to prepare the existing sheetpile wall
is to 'hydroblast' or pressure clean the metal surface of the exposed sheetpile from the
existing bulkhead to or below the waterline. This process is necessary to remove
deteriorated metal, barnacles and other marine growth. After the initial cleaning of the
sheetpiles was performed, it was observed that small to medium size holes were present
just below the waterline. These holes do not pose a structural stability concern at this time,
but do allow for the contained soils on the landward side of the sheeting to migrate into the
bay due to tidal effects. Future repairs will be likely if not corrected at this time. A field
meeting with all parties was conducted with the contractor, subcontractor. structural
designer and the City's representative, Hazen and Sawyer. It was determined that the
most cost effective solution was to repair the holes on the landward side of the existing
sheet piles by excavating the referenced area, installing a geotextile fabric along the
landward side of the existing sheetpile and pouring a tremie concrete mix simultaneously
when the above grade cap / bulkhead is constructed.
The additional costs to address this repair at this time is approximately $93,600 or
approximately $200 per linear foot. Negotiations with the contractor are ongoing and are
not final at this time. Time is of the essence due to the marina's / contractor's current
schedule. the existing baywalk disruption and loss of contractor productivity. Performing
,
j
January 9, 2002
RDA- Commission Memorandum
Appropriation for Additional Construction Costs at SSDI North and SSDI South
Page 4
the repairs at a later date does not only compromise the completion of the seawall /
bulkhead and / or the permanent baywalk, but will also increase costs considerably due
to future mobilization, restrictions to be encountered at the project site and disruptions to
the marina activities.
In order to proceed with the repair of the seawall and compensate the contractor for the
additional environmental remediation work previously performed, it is necessary and
recommended that the Board appropriate $189,039.93 from the South Pointe Tax
Increment Funds to comply with the City / RDA's obligations pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement.
JMG/C~/rar
\\CH2\VOL 1\CMGRlAGENDA\2OO21JAN0902IRDAIssdi.CM.doc