Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2017-30064 Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-30064 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2016-199-KB FOR DESIGN, BUILD, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION AND SMART PARKING SYSTEM (THE "PROJECT"), TO TRANSCORE ITS, LLC ("TRANSCORE"), AS THE TOP-RANKED PROPOSER, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TRANSCORE; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH TRANSCORE, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ITERIS, INC., AS THE SECOND HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH ITERIS, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SICE, INC., AS THE THIRD HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER, SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION OF A CONTRACT PRICE THAT IS WITHIN THE CITY'S BUDGETED APPROPRIATION FOR PHASE I AND PHASE II OF THE PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on September 14, 2016, the City Commission directed the Administration to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design, Build, Operation, and Maintenance Services for an Intelligent Transportation (ITS) and Smart Parking System (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, RFP No. 2016-199-KB was released on September 16, 2016, with an opening date of November 23, 2016; and WHEREAS, pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on September 29, 2016; and WHEREAS, the RFP provided for a two-step, phased evaluation process; and WHEREAS, the Phase I selection process, related to the qualifications, experience and availability of the proposers and key members of the design-build team, including the lead designer and lead contractor; and WHEREAS, only those proposers short-listed during Phase I were authorized to proceed to Phase II of the RFP, in which price and detailed technical proposals, based on the approved Design Criteria Package (the "DCP"), would be considered; and WHEREAS, under Phase I, the City received proposals in response to the RFP from the following four (4) firms: Iteris, Inc., MasTec Advanced Technologies, SICE, Inc., and TransCore ITS, LLC; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2016, MasTec Advanced Technologies (MasTec) was notified that its proposal failed to include the fully completed and executed Certification Form (Appendix A (pg. 21), Proposal Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit) as stated in the RFP, and, accordingly, was deemed non-responsive; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2016, via LTC # 512-2016, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee (the "Evaluation Committee"), which convened on December 21, 2016 to consider the proposals submitted under Phase I; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee's Phase I rankings were as follows: 1) Iteris, Inc.; 2) TransCore ITS, LLC; and 3) SICE, Inc; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2017, the City Manager approved, pursuant to Section 0400 Proposal Evaluation, Paragraph 4, page 18, of RFP No. 2016-199-KB Design, Build, Operation, and Maintenance Services for an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and Smart Parking System (SPS), for all responsive firms to proceed to Phase II; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2017, the Procurement Department issued Phase II of the RFP to the short-listed proposers; and WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, the City received the technical and price proposals in response to Phase II of the RFP; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager via LTC # 512- 2016, convened on August 22, 2017 to consider the proposals received under Phase II; and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee's rankings for Phase II were as follows: (1) TransCore ITS, LLC; and (2) Iteris, Inc.; and (3) SICE, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City's Design-Build-Operate-Maintain contract for the Project provides for the work to be performed in up to six separate phases, Phase 1 through Phase 6 (each, a "Phase"), with the design and construction work for each Phase, and the operations and maintenance work for each Phase, to be authorized separately by the City; the contract further provides that the contractor shall have no entitlement to perform any work, unless such work is authorized by the City; and WHEREAS, the City, working with its Program Manager, Kimley Horn, estimated project costs of approximately $10.3 million for Phase I and II (Design, Construction, Operation and Maintenance), with a total project budget of approximately $14.5 million; however, the Cost Proposals submitted by the firms range from $14.5 to $26.5 million for Phases I and II, and range between $28 and 34 million for the total project; and WHEREAS, based on the funding currently available for the Project and since the cost proposals received pursuant to the RFP significantly exceed the City's cost estimate for the project, the Administration recommends the negotiation of a contract award for Phase 1 and Phase II of the Project; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's comments and rankings, the City Manager has recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission award the contract to TransCore ITS, LLC, as the top- ranked proposer, with such contract subject to and contingent upon the Administration's successful negotiation of the contract price for the Project; and, should negotiations with TransCore ITS, LLC not be successful, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Iteris, Inc., as the second highest ranked proposer; and, should negotiations with Iteris, Inc. not be successful, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with SICE, Inc., as the third highest ranked proposer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, accept the recommendation of the City Manager to award an agreement, pursuant to Request For Proposals (RFP) No. 2016-199- KB for Design, Build, Operation, And Maintenance Services for an Intelligent Transportation and Smart Parking System (the "Project"), to Transcore Its, LLC ("Transcore"), as the top-ranked proposer, and authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Transcore; further, should the Administration not be successful in negotiating an agreement with Transcore, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Iteris, inc., as the second highest ranked proposer; further, should the Administration not be successful in negotiating an agreement with Iteris, inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Sice, Inc., as the third highest ranked proposer; and further, subject to negotiation of a contract price that is within the City's budgeted appropriation for Phase I and Phase II of the Project, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /8 day of gcNfr 2017 fes, ATTEST: 4 /;y 1 •1 ' ' Flip Levine r • /11: i') ` ° Rafael Granado, City ,; ,Y T:\AGENDA\2017\9-Septemb: ProcureraenT)FP -199-Kf PS I •-199-KB RFP-ITS SPS(Phase II)-Reso.docx a73,. k,, 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE &FOR RFP-ITSCity Attorney Date Resolutions-R7 H MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 18, 2017 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 2016-199-KB FOR DESIGN, BUILD, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION AND SMART PARKING SYSTEM (THE "PROJECT"), TO TRANSCORE ITS, LLC ("TRANSCORE"), AS THE TOP-RANKED PROPOSER, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TRANSCORE; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH TRANSCORE, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ITERIS, INC., AS THE SECOND HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH ITERIS, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SICE, INC., AS THE THIRD HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER, SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION OF A CONTRACT PRICE THAT IS WITHIN THE CITY'S BUDGETED APPROPRIATION FOR PHASE I AND PHASE II OF THE PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS In November 2015, the City of Miami Beach City Commission entered into a contract between the City and Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA) for Program Management of the City of Miami Beach Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and Smart Parking System(SPS) Project. KHA has been coordinating with the City for the past six(6) months developing the minimum technical requirements for the project, Project Plan documents, Concept of Operation Documents, and Project Systems Engineering and Management Documents. The documents have assisted KHA in working with the City in defining the parameters for procuring Design-Build-Operate-Maintain services for the City of Miami Beach ITS and SPS Project. The project includes the implementation of technology to facilitate the City's monitoring and management of traffic conditions, thus allowing the City to respond real-time to roadway incidents, excess vehicular demand, emergency construction, and other events that may cause congestion along principal corridors. At the June 10, 2016 Neighborhood/Community Affairs Committee (NCAC), staff presented the project and received endorsement from the Committee.The direction from the NCAC was presented at the July 13,2016 City Commission Meeting. At the meeting, the City Commission directed staff to proceed with the project and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design-Build-Operate-Maintain services in September 2016. Although the project has been phased based on funding availability,the RFP for the project includes the implementation,operation,and maintenance of all the phases. RFP PROCESS—PHASE I On September 14, 2016, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Proposals (REP) No. 2016-199-KB for Design, Build, Operation, and Maintenance Services for an Intelligent Transportation(ITS)and Smart Parking System(S PS). On September 16, 2016,the RFP was issued and a voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on September 29,2016. In accordance with Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes, the RFP provides for a two-step, phased evaluation process. The Phase I selection process,relates to the qualifications of the firms through the process outlined in RFP Section 0400, Evaluation Methodology. Only those Proposers qualified during Phase I are authorized to proceed to Phase II of the RFP selection process,in which price and detailed technical proposals will be considered. Phase I responses were due and received on Wednesday, November 23, 2016.The City received proposals from the following four(4)firms: • Iteris • MasTec Advanced Technologies • SICE, Inc. • TransCore ITS,LLC On December 19,2016, MasTec Advanced Technologies(MasTec)was notified that its proposal failed to include the fully completed and executed Certification Form (Appendix A(pg. 21), Proposal Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit)as stated in the RFP, and, accordingly,was deemed non-responsive. Pursuant to Section 2-371(e), of the City Code,matters of responsiveness shall be at the determination of the City Manager and City Attorney. On November 28, 2016, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 512-2016.The Committee convened on December 21, 2016 to consider responsive proposals received. The Committee was comprised of Monica Beltran,Assistant Director, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach; Darlene M. Fernandez,Assistant Director, Miami- Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, Transportation Manager, Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach; Frank Quintana, Division Director, IT Department, City of Miami Beach; Javier Rodriguez, P.E., Transportation Systems Management and Operations Program Engineer, Florida Department of Transportation. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, references, and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFP. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A,in the following order: 1st Iteris, Inc. 2nd TransCore ITS,LLC 3rd SICE, Inc. On January 13, 2017,the City Manager approved,pursuant to Section 0400 Proposal Evaluation, Paragraph 4, page 18, of RFP No. 2016-199-KB Design, Build, Operation, and Maintenance Services for an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and Smart Parking System(SPS), for all responsive firms to proceed to Phase II.Accordingly, the following firms were authorized to proceed to Phase II of the RFP selection process, in which price and detailed technical proposals will be considered, Iteris, Inc.,SICE, Inc.and TransCore ITS,LLC. RFP PROCESS—PHASE II Upon receipt of the specification documents from the Transportation Department, on May 8, 2017, the Procurement Department issued Phase II of the RFP process to the short-listed proposers. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the short-listed proposers was held on May 17, 2017. On August 4, 2017, the City received proposals in response to Phase II of the RFP from the following short-listed proposers: • Iteris,Inc. • SICE, Inc. • TransCore ITS, LLC The Evaluation Committee,appointed by the City Manager via LTC#512-2016, convened on August 22, 2017 to consider the technical proposals received under Phase II. The Committee was comprised of Monica Beltran, Assistant Director, Parking Department, City of Miami Beach; Darlene M. Fernandez,Assistant Director, Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, Transportation Manager, Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach; Frank Quintana, Division Director, IT Department,City of Miami Beach;Javier Rodriguez, P.E.,Transportation Systems Management and Operations Program Engineer, Florida Department of Transportation. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided general information on the scope of services, a copy of each proposal,and engaged in a question and answer session with each proposer. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFP for Phase II. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment B,in the following order: 1st TransCore ITS, LLC 2nd Iteris, Inc. 3rd SICE, Inc. A summary of firms follows: TransCore ITS.LLC: According to the firm, TransCore ITS, LLC, as the City's prime contractor along with thier lead design partner, BCC Engineering, Inc., is pleased to present this technical proposal focused on the early phase deployment for the City of Miami Beach's Intelligent Transportation and Smart Parking System DBOM. TransCore is uniquely-qualified as the nation's largest firm providing Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) solutions, specializing in ITS programs, and offering the City of Miami Beach'revenue generating'transportation and smart parking opportunities through our RFID products and subsystems.We are also the only turnkey services firm with the complete offering to Design,Build,Operate and Maintain for you. TransCore has successfully proven experience as the first and only ITS DBOM provider in Florida for the I-10/1-110 ITS DBOM in Pensacola with on-going operations and maintenance(O&M)into 2018 and beyond.Additionally, and highly important to this Miami Beach program,is that TransCore has been providing ITS maintenance for FDOT District Six for the past 15-plus years. In May,we were awarded the continuing ITS maintenance services contract, based out of the SunGuide TMC,for the District until at least 2022. There is zero learning curve in selecting TransCore to deploy, operate and maintain for the City of Miami Beach! Most excitedly though, TransCore understands how important customer service is for all of your visitors and tourists in order to provide a first class experience to your premier destination. This comes through a parking reservation system that can be uniquely Miami Beach, effectively rolling out the red carpet for your customers! As such, TransCore is proud to have Miami's own, MyPark,as part of our service offerings. MyPark(usemypark.com)is a revolutionary service that enables the monetization and control of premium parking spaces at high traffic, high value spots,while offering the City's visitors a most convenient and fun way to park. This is accomplished by combining the unique MyPark device with their user-friendly reservation and payment app,making MyPark a complete solution for providing parking convenience. Iteris. Inc.: According to the firm, as transportation professionals, it is known that cities make even better music through easing congestion and providing a more harmonious transportation experience that gives time back to the people and increases a City's livability and quality of life for the users of the City's infrastructure.The Iteris Team is focused on delivering the ITS and SPS project to ensure customer success -- not just for the City, but also its partner agencies, residents, travelers and visitors who are the lifeblood of the City. Iteris delivers the right information at the right time to over 1 million travelers per week to make better decisions based on real-time conditions on the transportation network. Iteris is the leader in applied informatics for transportation systems with offices nationwide.The firm specializes in collecting and aggregating actionable data for contextually relevant solutions in traffic engineering, traffic signal systems, ITS, and transportation planning.The Team that Iteris has formed for the City's ITS and SPS DBOM offers many experienced engineers planners and data analysts with extensive knowledge of ITS1 and integration,traffic operations and parking management. SICE. Inc.: According to the firm,to present a compelling strategic alliance for this project, SICE has partnered with well-known local firms, supplementing the skills, knowledge and capacity of our team. With the exceptional capabilities of all companies combined, the City will have access to an unparalleled level of ITS and Smart Parking experience, ensuring that the project objectives are achieved. As ITS prime contractor, SICE has been successfully delivering ITS projects since the 80s, on a daily basis our Traffic Management systems manage more than 1,500 miles of road and 1500 traffic intersections around the world. SICE is currently engaged in ITS deployment projects as Prime contractor within Districts Two, Four, Five and Six and have an exceptional understanding of FDOT and Miami-Dade standards,specifications and procedures. SICE brings local maintenance experience performing maintenance and maintenance planning of the ITS infrastructure of our existing construction projects, such as the I- 95 Phase 3A- 2, SR 821 (HEFT), and 1-75 Segment E. SICE understands the technical challenges of this Project and the importance of teaming with the proper local and experienced resources to able to successfully implement it. The Team is dedicated and committed to create long term relationships with their customers.We look forward to the opportunity to partner with the City of Miami Beach for this project.We strongly believe that the balance between our technical capabilities, the successful collaboration between the parties, the allocation of a skilled local management team, and our previous similar experiences will lead to the successful delivery of an ITS and Smart Parking System that is 100%aligned to meet and exceed the project goals and objectives outlined in the RFP. CONCLUSION Working with its Program Manager, Kimley Horn,the City had estimated project costs of approximately$10.3 million for Phase I and II,with a total project budget of approximately$14.5 million. However,the Cost Proposals submitted by the firms range from $14.5 to$26.5 million for Phases I and II,and range between$28 and 34 million for the total project. Therefore,the cost proposals received pursuant to the RFP significantly exceed the City's cost estimate for the project. Notwithstanding the budgetary concerns,after reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, I find that TransCore ITS, LLC (TransCore),who has been unanimously top-ranked by the Evaluation Committee, has provided the best overall technical proposal. Some of the highlights of the TransCore technical proposal, as articulated by the Evaluation Committee,include: • The team proposed by TransCore has a proven track record of successfully implementing projects under the design,build, operate and maintain(DBOM)methodology contemplated for the City's project. • The innovative aesthetic consideration of the signage related to the project was very much appreciated. • Enjoyed their proposed dashboard system and the fact that it's a cloud based system which may be accessed from anywhere. • TransCore provided a lot of out of the box ideas related to the aesthetics and the technology component of the project. Nonetheless,upon review of proposed costs,the City's Program Manager is confident that the City will be able to negotiate with the highest ranked firm to reach an agreement in scope and cost to better align with the City's Vision of the project and available budget. City staff and Program Manager reviewed the price proposals submitted by each of the firms and identified various points of discrepancy with the City's Project Systems Engineering and Management Documents(PSEMP)included in as part of the RFP Package.These discrepancies can be used as points of negotiation to ensure the City is receiving the best price possible for the services provided.The points of discrepancy identified were the following: • ITS:The PSEMP specifies that wherever possible,devices shall be installed on existing infrastructure(traffic signal poles, street light poles,and other existing infrastructure).All three(3)proposals assumed a worst case scenario of providing new poles for all devices. • SPS: The PSEMP specified that the City Commission only approved integration of existing gate counting system at City Garages with Digital Message Signs outside garages to display parking capacity information. All three (3) proposers included Level-by-level space count systems in their cost proposals. • Communications: The PSEMP specified a wireless system for Communication of the project. The proposers included Hybrid systems including fiber for connection to Sunguide/FDOT network at the Downtown Miami NAP center. In addition, the City's Program Manager has specifically compared the line items provided by the proposers and identified the various items where the price provided by the proposers exceeds industry standards (Attachment C). These items will be used as part of the negotiations. Furthermore, the City's Program Manager has identified three (3) projects with similar scopes and proposed number of devices implemented by the Florida Department of Transportation District 4 for much lower prices. After reviewing all the submissions,the results of the evaluation process,and the City's Program Manager's assessment of the proposals submitted,the City Manager recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with TransCore ITS, LLC, as the top ranked proposer; and, should negotiations fail, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Iteris, Inc., as the second highest ranked proposer; and, should negotiations fail,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with, SICE, Inc. ,as the third highest ranked proposer; further,authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with the successful firm. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure Comprehensive Mobility Addressing All Modes Throughout The City FINANCIAL INFORMATION The final cost of the related services, shall be determined upon successful negotiations, and are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. Grant funding will not be utilized for this project. Legislative Tracking Transportation/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Attachment A: Phase I Scoring and Ranking ❑ Attachment B: Phase II Scoring and Ranking ❑ Attachment C ❑ Resolution Y co N— M N re w Q J 0 .40 on N M cozen6upoa Jamar ccg en c Y r c.) N co co re eue1ump)weld o IN, co N c0 ze!a-Jaued le sor rn co c N M N— CO(0 CC zapuewad auepea g rn o C) c N CO 1 c0 ce uegag eoiuow go' a o 4 YS F p _ a yi Uc U '1709 , °' 1— ce _ ;3:-- kms. 7 cn ft- cc zan6ppo8 m r % I cn I ill ce _mo Aa r E 7 \ LT)ill CO —J 222 » —g«« _ , (k _-e ! f! )£ a. a . - ea It 2 ! ; � s 'fiJ "' s ;= cJ ] 1i \ g . I ; a.£ e ms a ! ��m 22 I'-.- k3 " a m w w \/ �2° } ` I o ! $ a TX | i r — �7 C_� 2i \\ k< ( -a umm m Si ® ) §\_,_ { ■■� c. = ©q± \\(/ ego } )/§) z ) GQSg2 Ow' S � °J/o�� — ; §\\� co a CO .' o w a g \ 22\ ) e cco5 § / {§/ \ ATTACHMENT C TRANSCORE Trar#score. _ _ I'HA' Difference Project Components Total Equipment Poles $ 430,500.00 $ $ 430,500.00 Dynamic Message Sign-Arterial DMS $ 2,887,500.00 $ 1,400,000.00 $ 1,487,500.00 ITS Cabinet $ 889,875.00 $ 370,320.00 $ 519,555.00 MOT $ 525,000.00 $ - $ 525,000.00 ITS Installation,Testing and Documentation $4,483,500.00 $ - $ 4,483,500.00 SPS Installation,Testing and Documentation $ 971,500.00 $ - $ 971,500.00 Client Software and License (TMC) $ 1,175,000.00 $ 33,500.00 $ 1,141,500.00 System Design and Implementation $ 2,800,000.00 $ 1,113,755.00 $ 1,686,245.00 • The DMS model chosen is larger than the model prescribed in the PSEMP • Sensors will be used at ramps to provide level-by-level counts • Site 1 and 4 are proposed to be connected to FDOT fiber at 1-395 and 1-195 to provide connection to the TMC ITERIS teris . KHA ProjectsComponents Total " Difference Dynamic Message Sign- Freeway DMS $ 431,460.00 $ - $ 431,460.00 System Design/Installation/Integration $4,443,934.00 $ 1,113,755.00 $ 3,330,179.00 Construction $ 765,243.78 $ - $ 765,243.78 Wireless Communications Network $ 565,080.00 $ 69,582.00 $ 495,498.00 Electrical Service $ 963,900.00 $ - $ 963,900.00 Client Software and License $ 1,533,115.00 $ 33,500.00 $ 1,499,615.00 • Smart City Software • One monument DMS approaching each garage displaying available space count by level • Sensors will be used at ramps to provide level-by-level counts SICE project Components Sf HA Difference Total . Dynamic Message Sign- DMS $ 2,307,158.38 $ 1,400,000.00 $ 907,158.38 Underground Conduits (Fiber) $ 520,803.63 $ - $ 520,803.63 Wireless Communications Network $ 644,473.99 $ 69,582.00 $ 574,891.99 Electrical Service $ 490,670.99 $ - $ 490,670.99 FOOT District 4 Project Comparison Central Souther ITS Components ATMS8@ 3 Miami Beach Broward Browar ...; CCTV Video Cameras 63 42 48 58 Dynamic Message Sign- DMS 10 4 9 34 Vehicle Detection System - MVDS 54 15 2 18 Travel Time System - Bluetooth 33 - 17 30 Cabinet Updates - - 13 61 Cabling Cost- Fiber 18 miles 20 miles 32 miles - ' 4JjTotal Cost $8,970,181.00 $5,356,870.89 $7,982,486.00' ,