Loading...
Agreement with A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 11Z-(21 -c) ?at AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND A& P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-028-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29881 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND A & P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the Statehaving principal Florida, its offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp., a Florida corporation principal havingits rinci al office at 10305 N.W. 41 Street, Suite 115, Miami, Florida 33178 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on February8, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-028-KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017-29881, 'vel authorizingthe Cityto enter into negotiations with A & P Consulting Transportation respectively, Engineersp , Corp. and if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement.A reement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic in this Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Services g Consultant s perform, City's at the Cit 's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. 3 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be p y considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation y having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City'sobligations obli ations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a Project acting p p rY p governmental including,bodyincludin , but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its Jurisdiction, the exerciseregulatory of such re ulator authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall pursuant deemed to have occurred to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "CityCommission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "CityManager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City g Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Project in writing, includingthe Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, regulatory or to re ulato or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted City provide established bythe to for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final signed and sealed (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultantpursuant ursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction ofthe Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any g jurisdiction agencies havin in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: entity The named on page 1 and 4 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under p yees or g the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any entity,entit , except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed engineer in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professionalpractice ractice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to 4 perform CEI services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "E", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement City s ecified and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, approved by the p below) additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount specified as maybe s ecified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), the Consultant exhibits, addenda, Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a Project, and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with requirementsstipulated sti ulated in such Consultant Service Order. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), Request Re uest for Qualifications (RFQ), Design Criteria Package (if any). CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between Cityand Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entitycontracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise,or specificationsperformance- oriented drawings of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permitdesign-build desi n-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the Cityto enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget quality standards, Y estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, storm water retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTSg "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final configuration and character1 p preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until p . g (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been 5 approved bythe Cityand agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures reviewed and g as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be p construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force J occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control thatan are not due to act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, Y which have, or may be reasonablyexpected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the City rights and obligations of or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which impact normallyim act on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant delayedperforming is in erformin any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Forceeure.Majeure. Anytime extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established bythe City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. Themay,Project Cost from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole pp discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). g Y PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and hereof; provided, thisAgreement, Agreement the A reement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included onlyand shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect for reference purposes to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to providekey the personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: 6 Schedule A— Scope of Services Schedule A-1 — Consultant Service Order Schedule B — Consultant Compensation Schedule C — Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Schedule D — Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Schedule E — Approved Subconsultants. "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any SCOPE OF SERVICES: Scop Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. pp SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost "Soft including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction STATEMENT OF PROBABLE Index (CSl)re ared Consultant in Construction Standard Cost" shall mean the detailed estimateprepared by nt's estimated a roved bythe Project Administrator, which includes the Consults format or other formatpp total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in as they may be amended from ) the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, sufficient detail to identify to the projected general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. "Work" all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, WORK: shall mean fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes es and tests, qualityassurance and/or quality control inspections and related government approvals, licenses, t , certifications, for surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary orappropriate and functioningof the Project, together with all additional, collateral the total construction, installation, and incidental items, II and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant s provide rovide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. commenced bythe Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service 2.2 The Services will be Order signedby the Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant City shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to g the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may p be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending endin changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this 2.4 The Consultant warrants p ll beperformed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design n Agreement sha p South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is of comparable projects in the Services. qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform experienced, fully p p Y 7 Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. Consultant further represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall be accurate, coordinated and adequate for construction in accordance with applicable industry standards thatgovern thepractice of engineering and shall comply with applicable City Codes, state and federal 9 laws, rules and regulations. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services to be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of allp arties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications,s ecifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate 9 records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. Notwithstanding this Section 2.5, the Consultant Service Order issued by the J City to Consultant shall specifically delineate and describe the Services to be provided by Consultant for the particular Project (that is the subject of such Order). 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive og r excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any inspection errors or omissions. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance payment nor y a ment for any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performanceAgreement.of the A reement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence, except due to Force Majeure as defined herein, in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 4 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standardprofessional of skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3Recognizing Reco nizin that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting 8 concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule q 1 of comp Upon U on receipt and review of Consultants, request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if 1 granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationshipwith the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that 1 have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in itsp erformance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (includingthe services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarilypossessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the is performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultantresponsible for, and shall represent to Citythat the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused bythe Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In g addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- performan all or portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's Y failure top erform in accordance with the above standards. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the Services required under the Agreement shall be construed p to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its Subconsultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its Subconsultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any Subconsultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of Services by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such Services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's Services. 2.11 The Cityshall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the to Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider performed anyServices by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design 9 professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions sions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvalsprovided bythe Cityunder this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and in w g, specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation g g of future solicitations.. 2.1g 2 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 1 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully 2. 3 g executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to thepprior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including p reassignment) of approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of an pp the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager er or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2g .14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial pg , roceedin s where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant bythe City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with anysuch additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant 10 Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance Performance of anysuch work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. anyand all Project documents and records 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize 1 and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such pertinent to the Services documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE 2.17 THE CITY HAS THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION DOCUMENTS. AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S PARTICIPATION OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S FAILURE TO RIG HTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S ACTION, SUIT PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OTHER CONSULTANT'S MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, applicable addressinga licable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCO NSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made bythe Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. g for ensuring Consultant shall be ultimately responsible the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' q compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving andaccepting acce tin such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. Il upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and The Consultant shall, p q information as the City reasonablyrequests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and 11 professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating age professionalr agreements and licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or anyother Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone wa in anynoncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without Y any limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The CityManager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative ty o act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without Imitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultantcomply to com I with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project ct Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no wayconstitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. City 3.2 The shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that possession the Cityhas in its pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verifyto the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracyand applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed bythe Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures p J (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling Project for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due Consultant'spp p Y to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the Cityobserves or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance nce with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. proprietary 3.5 The city, actingin itscapacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall pp render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. p City 3.6 The Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the 12 City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the • � p requests for decisions and approvals City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) q pp required hereunder bythe City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this q Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the � or portions ortions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive Y review thereof. 13 ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost p Budget (if a plicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project g Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 [Intentionally Omitted.] 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. [Intentionally Omitted.] 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting su ortin receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its 14 Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by 15 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack 16 of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or(3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and -all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through h the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first beg ranted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except 17 for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies except for the professional liability and workers compensation/employers liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurancep olicies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. pp Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwisep rovided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the 18 Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (including, (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized bythe Cityas caused byan error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that werere ared bythe Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have p p been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions bythe Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination q g thereof. Damagesshall include delaydamages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager.er. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction gra p after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant Y under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any p g damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby g agrees that the Cityshall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the g City Agreement,this A reement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 19 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: A & P Transportation Engineers, Corp. 10305 NW 41 Street, Suite 115 Doral, FL. 33178 Attn: Antonio G. Acosta All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of 20 Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company orp erson, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 [Intentionally Omitted] 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her 21 partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank. 22 WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their IN byduly names their authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIA CH: .‘,r-\ E3 E.-- '-`-'N .'-')d " _ ....� CITY CLER ,••• --...:0 .\< , MAYOR 'N.,.. \\,.. /7 ,_;.. ,..0.c: ,,,,,, / ..,,:z,,.._.,„„v,r'i,,,„:,..,- c ,--/* ',;,, tt I A C 1.7'‘F. ,-,-- **:::-2-7.-: .** 4 ''':\ Date ' P ' - c 1 Date Pk v-/ . :\ ti i 1 .� • , "57/61-�� ....••�.,�, ,;;- INFERS CORP. Attest f) i ' r.� ,,,:// A & P T. . .-:P O TAT E G 1 /4/6 )1 . V ' Signature/Secretary Signature/P -sident c AALOS , it. EA-A• FWD ill 0 (n . k C C)-Sk- Print Name Print Name ' 1tlzot -7 Date Date APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &F O R EXECUTION /1/lit r, t-,/,%,a0i- ,41/ (- City Attorney ' 9 Date 23 SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provideprofessional rofessional engineering services on an "as needed basis" to provide Construction Engineering and Inspectionservices pursuant to the Agreement. Each firm awarded placed contract hereby agrees to be on a list of professionals that will provide CEI services where the them toperform professional services for certain City projects, (the Project or City may call upon the City, in its sole discretion and judgment. As the need for service arises, Projects), as assigned by negotiated scope will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the g p firms Professional services will be quoted as a not to exceed or lump sum based on the of work and cost. estimated hours to complete a project and in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C" of this Agreement. The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order; the Consultant shall sign it and return it to the City for execution by the City Manager or his/her designee. The Consultant's Basic Servicesmay that be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist Y of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the project such that the is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, p accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (PIO) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc. may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utilityowners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) EstimatingServices: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule p.slips.sPre are cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost- related aspectsengineering of en ineerin and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/ cost assessment, design-to-cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. g c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, address concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident residents' p p Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre-Construction Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, 24 produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre-Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre-construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice-to-Proceed to the Contractor. f) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, PIO, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discussp otential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. g) Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For eachJro'ect that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at p least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors". The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the City's guidelines. i) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of p Y g specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required, the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. j) DailyReports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day,, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review. The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily reports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job-site, general field p observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: 25 • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of(potential) disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of(potential) disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non-Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on- going construction documentation, and ending with post-construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-BuilderTM document management system on a weekly basis. I) Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that a submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non-Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e- BuilderTm, the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with 26 Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non-complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre-Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Administrator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Administrator and shall issue a written Non-compliance Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Administrator shall issue a Non-compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. p) Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. q) Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFIs/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response to RFIs and CDCs in a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. s) Schedule: Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e. baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as-built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, resource allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. 27 t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign-off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing with the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing mark-ups are properly maintained by the Contractor. The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient. The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non-safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concern and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing and verbally. • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency/ condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction-related accident, Consultant shall notify the City of the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a copy forwarded to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice-to-Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor's quality control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for each phase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. 28 y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the project schedule in accordance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Contractor shall provide the Consultant, City and Design Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre-Construction Meeting for general informationp urposes. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa)Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the City for issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb)Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, and prepare a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This master punch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of each project which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder, as required by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for each project for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once all parties determine the work is complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd)Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended top rovide support to both the City and the Design Consultant during the constructionp hase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Administrator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design 29 concept and constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR can provide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names of personnel proposed for assignment to the1ro'ect, including a detailed resume for each. The City reserves the right to have Consultant's p personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct or performance is detrimental to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of field personnel. 4. The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Significant changes to the work requirements may require the Consultant to revise the QA Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work requirements. The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationship to the part of the organization performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained during the execution of the QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City's procedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by the organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation that occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by this Agreement. 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review — The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare and process the required documentation to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right-of-Way construction projects. 30 ............ .. SCHEDULE A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017-028-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount $ of: $ Total Agreement to Date: City's Project Date Administrator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 31 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION AGREEMENT BETWEENT THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS Project Name and No: Scope of Services: Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage of work complete as identified in the Consultant Service Order. 32 SCHEDULE C CONSULTANT HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFC 2017-028-XB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN':AS NEEDED*BASIS ................................................. ........... .... . —; CATEGORIES HOURLY RATES .,M. ................. Project $x:82. �My, Project Manager $1.56.51 Senior Cost Estimator s Cost Estimator Senior Scheduler $104.34 Scheduler Sr.InspectorCO inspector(CEI,Field or Construction) The hold inspector S109.56 Senior Civil Engineer Civil Engineer Senior Electrical Engineer $135.65 Electrical $114.78 EngineerSenior Mechankal $135.65 MechanicalEngineer S114.78 Senior Structural Engineer $135.65 .......................................... Structural Special Inspector $114.78 Clerical/Admin. $41.74 33 SCHEDULE D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 34 SCHEDULE E APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS THE PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 35 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 2017-29881 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE Girt OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFC)) NO. 201-7-0284tB, FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CM SERVICES ON AN HAS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EAC CONSULTING, INC., AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; A & P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC., AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on February 8, 2011, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFO) No. 2017-028-KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an"As Needed Basis': and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2017-028-KB (the 'RFO") was released on February 10, 2017; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on February 23 2017; and WHEREAS, on April 14,2017,the City received a total of 18 proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on May 10, 2017 to review and score the remaining:proposals; and WHEREAS,the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each :proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows: EAC Consulting, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp„ as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer, and Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City 'Manager has recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and inspection services, on an as needed' basis, and further authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with EAC Consulting, Inc, as the first ranked proposer; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the second ranked 36 proposer; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp , as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinckerhoff. Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and Calvin. Giordano &Associates. Inc.. as the fifth ranked proposer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE MY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and Cy Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFC)) No. 2017.028.KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection(CEI)Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an As Needed Basis*: authorize the Administration to establish a pool of prequalified consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and inspection services, on an as needed' basis: authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with EAC Consulting, Inc., as the first ranked proposer, Stanter Consulting Services. Inc.., as the second ranked proposer; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp., as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer, and Calvin, Giordano &Associates. Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administraf•n. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of........Ali_201 . / ......1- :1' ' s// ,,s,,,,, Philip Levine, i S 4 1 1 4.:tk‘ sp-iiltif„ R. '.el E. ranas.,C Cleric/ tftwo.0..--..:::161%. 1 4\1 \/ FAPURVALUSokitAtions1017\2017 , .-„.7,:c -7,,itt:i . w,-.'we. tdi . tkol,* . ino!. Documento2 4,Andivo. 20170 ; .CEI Services-Resolutorit4,16,p, I: i * !., ''" -;.INCORIL 'RATED! * $ ,1, 41 0 NO OP"' itkl)P A OV ED AS TO FORM&LANGU1411 &FOR Dlairlaii \r---' 400.....~. oil . 5\11 11 CM:my iet.p f) DO 37 MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mater and Members of the Cid Commission FROM: L.Morales,City Manager DATE: June 7,2017 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION'.. (RFQ) NO. 2017-028-KB, FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION N ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION GE FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-OUALIFI PREQUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, N "AS NEEDS BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EAC CONSULTING, INC.,AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC, S THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC., AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH RAN. . PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RELKIMMEN,QMQN Adopt the Resolution. nA¢.....H ...Lzla,t'.'b. Adequate management of construction projects by the Administration x implementation of CE1 services including, but not limited to, general l ordination, value engineering, ` - c.onstruction, field observations, shop drawing submittals, quality control, and closeouts.The ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms avalableto provide these seMoes enables the City to effectively and efficiently m . these projects.On March 13, 2013, the Mayor and ty Commission approved Ova award of a contract, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 52-11/12 for Professional Construction E nering and Inspection(CEI) Firms to Pr . .. ice "As Needed Basis", top ve ranked proposers:Atkins North 38 America, Inc., BermeIto Ajamil& Partners, Inc, Chen Moore and Associates, Corm Castela Carbaito Thompson Selman, RA. (C3TS)„ and Parson Brinckerhoff, inc. (the *Agreement"). This Agreement is effective through October 8,2017. BEQL In order to complete a successor agreement, on February 8, 2017, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFC)) No. 2017-0284KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection(CEI) Firms to Prole Various CEI Services on an *As Needed Basis'.On February 10, 2017, the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on February 23, 2017.RFC) responses were dee and received on April 14, 2017.The City received a total of 18 proposals.The City received proposals from the following firms: •300 Engineering Group, P.A. • P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp, •Alpha Construction and Engineering Corporation •Amec Foster Wheeler Environment&Infrastructure, Inc. • Calvin,Giordano&Associates, inc. •Chen Moore and Associates •CIMA Engineering Corp. • CPM North America PPLC • EAC Consulting, Inc. • Keith&Schnars • etc Engineering,Inc. • Nehsork Engineering Services, Inc, •New Millenrium Engineetirg,Inc. • Parsons Brinckerhoff, Pennon'Associates, Inc. • Rummel, Klepper&Kahl,LLP •Sciritwebke-Stiskin&Associates,Inc. • Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. On May 1, 2017, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 238.2017, The Evaluation Committee convened on May 10, 2017, to consider proposals received,The Committee was comprised of Eugene Egemba, Civil Engineer III, Public Works Engineering Department City of Miami Beach; David Gomez, Senior Capital Project Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program Division, City of Miami Beach; Jose Rivas, Civil Engineer 111, Public Works Engineering Department, City of Miami Beach; and Mina Saniandi, Senior Capital Project Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program Division, City of Miami Beach.The Committee was provided an overview of the project information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law.The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal.The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the raking of proposers indicated in Attachment A, in the following order: 1. EAC Consulting,Inc. 39 2. Stantec Consulting Services* Inc. 3.A& P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. 4. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. 5.Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc. 6. Metric Engineering, inc. 7.Rummel,Klepper& Kahl, LLP 8. Keith& Schnars 9. New Millennium Engineering, Inc. 9. SchebkeShiskin&Associates, Inc. 11.Amec Foster Wheeler Environment& Infrastructure, inc. 12. Network Engineering Services. Inc. 13. Chen Moore and Associates 14.Alpha Construction and Engineering Corporation 15. 300 Engineering Group, PA. 16. Pennoni Associates, Inc. 17. CI MA Engineering Corp. 18. CPM North America PPLC A summaryof each top-ranked firm follows: EAC Consulting, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, EAC Consulting, Inc. has maintained a good professional standing with the State of Florida Division of Corporations for over 20 years and has held a professional engineering certification vAth the State of Florida Department of Business Regulation and the Florida Board of Professional Engineering since its inception. All key professional staff members possess all the required licenses and certifications required to undertake and complete CEI services for the City.The firm has more than 95 professionals and support staff, all Located within the State of Florida and working out of four(4)offices located in Miami-Dade, Seaward, Palm Beach and Orange Counties. Stantec Consutting Services, Inc. According to I information provided by the firm, Stantec, founded in 1954, provides professional consulting services in planning, engineering, architecture, interior design, Landscape architecture, surveying, geotechnical, environmental sciences, project management, and project economics for infrastructure and facilities projects. Continually strtving to balance economic, environmental, and social responsibilities, they are recognized as a world-class leader and innovator in the delivery of sustainable solutions. They support public and private sector clients in a diverse range of markets at every stage, from the initial conceptualization and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. According to the information provided by the firm,A& P Consulting is a multidisciplinary Miami Dade County headquartered engineering company that was established in 1997.The firm has more than 95 local employees dedicated exclusively to transportation/infrastructure projects.A P Consulting prides itself in serving a wide variety of clients and offending to their individual needs. The firm is unparalleled in client satisfaction providing their clients with focused and innovative solutions that yield cost effective results. Since its establishment the firm has 40 completed a myriad of projects ranging in scale and complexity.The broad spectrum of award winning projects provides the diverse foundation necessary to triumph over any challenge that may arise. It is this diversity,which enables the fin to guarantee effective project execution for targescale government projects white simultaneously delivering to private and goverment clients the delicacy that is indispensable to their particular needs. Parsons Biinckertioff,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Parsons Brinckerhoff provides engineering and multidisciplinary services in a vast array of industry sectors, with a focus on technical excellence and client service.Throughout Florida, the firm services a diverse range of transportation projects, administering infrastructure and construction expertise.The firms construction experience comprises construction management program management, and CEI on traditional and alternative delivery approaches with public-sector clients such as FDOT, counties, municipaities, expressway authorities, aviation departments and school boards. Through their statewide experience, the firm has developed an in-depth knowledge FOOT and expressway authority's policies and procedures and Florida contractor construction methodologies and site conditions, enabling the firm to consistently deliver projects that are on schedule, within budget and designed and built in conformance with contract plans and specifications. Calvin,Giordano&Associates, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Calving Giordano&Associates has a proven track record, technical excellence, exceptional project management, reliability, responsiveness and an un-paraileted dedication.The firm has been providing services in the transportation industry for over 15 years.They strive to ensure their clients' projects are built in accordance with FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, FDEP, Cities, and Counties approved plans and specifications.Finally, Calving Giordano & Associates provides experienced professional engineers, project administrators, contract support specialists, resident compliance specialist , LAP coordinators, inspection staff, project managers, and administrative staff for all facets of roadway and bridge construction projects. CONC1,11$JOR After reviewing all the submissions and results of the evaluation process. I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and inspection services, on an as needed basis,* in order to assure that the City's needs for construction engineering and inspection services is avMable expeditiously from firms qualified to perform the work: EAC Consulting, Inc., as the first ranked proposer, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the second raced proposer, A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp., as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer. Further, I recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration,with the prequalified firms. • • * it Ensure Comprehensive Mobility Addressing All Modes Throughout The City ENAMS1021Mtlanati 41 The cost of the related services.determined upon successful negotiations, are subject t funds aNraitability approved through the City's budgeting process. Grantfunding may also be utilized. w Public W rks/C taImprovement roe is rocr me t Description o Attachment. o Resolution 42 M w .1: upasiummammennisimmeammumosmasimiamiiiismose wassEssmountinteRSX NW MUIR 11111.1114 WS OM SO 1 Qs1 t eeu t2L's t8as kO r..SO 1, ' A0 41 0 4O 0,(<1 i.[ 1111111 V co 1"' dM`.-k.',0 k6 5^e i 2 ye ar4y,[.e; :'o 2II- P. - r 0,0 t 0 0 1C ''''.." CI'..V *a t .1 2 - a 3 4c7ti 4: i t.. a 0 ollt_, ', Li g O. ,a Z.at 0 0 0 A S V ,C 43 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 45 MIAAAIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Me(( ur"A',eriue 32FLDor Beach, Flcrida 33139 www€raar ibe acha goy PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS April 6, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday, April 14, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. I. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign In Sheet II. MODIFICATIONS. A. Section 0300 Submittal Instructions & Format, Tab 3 has be revised as follows: TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, , phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. B. Appendix F Contract, Article 5 has be revised as follows: .:.-e • •_::_ •- •e• 1 - • - '.• -.I- •e•' " e •••e • - • • . . . . . . . . . 1 ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES I ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS • -* - •• • •-- •• * ** * * * *.• -1 e 1-- •e • - • * * * 111. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Qi: On page 13 it states "For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services" Where can we find Tab 3? Al: Please refer to Modification A above. Q2: I would like to know if there are any restrictions for Sub-consultants in relation to teaming- up with several prime Consultants on Miami Beach CEI (RFQ 2017-028-KB) project. A2: There are no restrictions for sub consultants teaming up with several prime consultants. Q3: Any chance the submittal deadline for subject RFQ will be postponed? A3: Submittal deadline was extended pursuant to Addendum No. 1. Q4: Who is on the Evaluation Committee? A4: Evaluation committee has not yet been established. Q5 On page 13 the instructions for Tab 3 - Approach and Methodology ask us to address the project timeline. As this RFQ is for CEI services, the project timeline is a function of the construction contract and is therefore out of our control. The same can be said for identifying phasing options — that is a function of the design and the CEI firm has no control over that aspect of the project. How should we address these two issues? A5: Please refer to Modification A above. Q6: Tab 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements states that Appendix C is to be filled out and included. Cl in Appendix C indicates that proposers are to include a minimum of 5 CEI references in the past 10 years — must include project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information, and prime proposer's role. Tab 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm states thatro osers should include relevant p p experience (but is not restricted by 10 years) — must include for each project a project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone and email, and term of engagement. It appears that these 2 sections are asking for the same information, except Tab 2.1 does not have a 10 year restriction. Please clarify that this is the case and that projects 2 ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS referenced in Appendix C1 should also be included under Tab 2.1. A6: Proposer may submit the same projects listed in Appendix Cl or additional projects; it is at the discretion of the proposer. Q7: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and is included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A7: There is no conflict; however this contract will not require material testing. Please refer to Modification B above. Q8: Page 26, Item C1.1 - Question: the item states "...(CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities..." can references from the City of Miami Beach be used? A8: References may be from the City of Miami Beach. Q9: Please advise if the Project Manager must be a licensed professional or can a person having suitable qualifications and experience be designated as the Project Manager? A9: The PM does not have to be a licensed professional. Suitable qualifications and experience will be sufficient. Q10: Responses to Appendix A will be as a separate document or typed into PDF form? A10: Responses to Appendix A may be provided in a separate document or typed into a PDF form. Please keep in mind This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. Q11: 2.3 Financial Capacity, is the Dun & Bradstreet(SQR) required at time of proposal or after selection of consultants? All: At the request of the city, proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the procurement contact named in the solicitation. Q12: Will we need to include complete services for public information, not to be done by the City? Al2: No. Q13: Our company wishes to amend our company policy with regard to Benefits by including the below statement. Does the City find this company policy acOeptable for the purpose of compliance with its "Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494"? Statement to be included: "In the event that a law in a state or specific jurisdiction or a •.,..,nw�nr 3 ADDENDUM.NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN AS NEEDED"BASIS condition of a client contract requires us to provide benefits for domestic partners, we will provide the coverage required by applicable law or contract to domestic partners who are required to be covered." Al 3: Response should be submitted with your proposal for the City's review. Q14: On Page 3 of the RFQ there is a statement right above Item 3. That reads " This RFQ is not governed by the Requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. Section 287.055 is referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation's Act which governs how Professional Services contracts are procured in Florida. Please clarify the intent of the City regarding this statement. Will price be a consideration? Or will professional qualifications be the only consideration? And if so why is this contract not governed by F.S. 287.055? A14: Only professional experience and qualifications are being considered for this solicitation. Q15: Who will be the Contract Manager or Project Manager for the City of Miami Beach? A15: Contract/Project managers may be from any City department requiring professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services. Q16: Has the Technical Review Committee been appointed? If so who are the members? A16: Evaluation committee members have not yet been established. Q17: Will any of the projects that will be assigned under this contract be funded with Federal funds or through Local Agency Program (LAP) funding? A17: It is the intent of the City to use this contract to provide CE&I services for any City project including projects that are partially funded with federal funds. Funding for CE&l services will be paid with local funding. Q18: Will this contract include construction inspection services for buildings or other vertical structures? A18: Yes. Q19: Will Threshold Inspections be part of the services of this contract? A19: Please refer to Modification B above. Q20: How many contracts will the City award for this procurement? A20: It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as-needed basis. 4 ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS Q21: What will be the duration of this contract? A21: The term of this contract will be for a period of three (3) years with the option to renew two (2) additional one (1) year terms. Q22: What will be the dollar value of this contract? A22: To be determined. Q23: Please advise if form 330 is required to be included in the Statement of Qualifications? A23: The Standard Form 330 is not a submittal requirement of this solicitation. Q24: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and is included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A24: Please refer to response A7 above. Q25: Will the information from and presented at the Pre-Proposal Meeting on February 24th be published as an addendum to the RFQ? A25: Questions raised in the pre-proposal meeting have been included in this addendum. Q26: Does the City intend to request the D&B SQR to be submitted with Tab 2 and will this be stipulated in an addendum? A26: See response Al 1 above. Q27: Please clarify the page and/or file size limitations for the SOQ as discussed in the Pre- Proposal meeting? A27: The page size and/or file size is at the discretion of the proposer. Q28: What is the previous RFQ Advertisement # to the present "Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI services on an as Needed Basis"#2017-028-KB? A28: The previous RFQ No. was 52-11/12. Q29: Can you please upload the Pre-proposal meeting sign-in sheet? A29: Sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit A. Q30: On page 18 (#3) it's requesting (3) references, also on page 26 under Cl (#1) it's also requesting references. Do we need to q g submit a total of (8) references. ? Or just (5) as stated in the pre-bid meeting? A30: Please refer to response A6 above. Q31. Do we need to submit the Appendix F- Contract (page 38) with submittal package? Or is 5 ADDENDUM NO,5 �� 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES 1 ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS this only submitted when the project has been awarded? A31: The contract is not a proposal submittal requirement. Q32: Do we need to submit any pricing? A32: Pricing is not a proposal submittal requirement. • Q33: Can you clarify page 13,TAB 3 -- It states "for each scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of services, submit detailed information on the approach..." a) Are you referring to scope of work outlined in Appendix C— page 26-33 (02 Statement of Work)? b) What do you mean for each (underlined above)? A33: Please refer to response Al above. Q34: How many CEI firms will be selected from this RFQ? A34: Please refer to response A20 above. Q35: Appendix A, number 5 states: "Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation." Where in the solicitation is "controlling financial interest" defined? 1 A35: Please refer to the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelG ranado(a�m iam ibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: T Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. S ;%- ely, dor AI,-x D--nis curement Director 6 ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-028-KB LFICAT ONS I PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS EXHIBIT A Pre-Proposal MeetingSign-in Sheet 7 ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS AAIANBEAcH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING S1GN-IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFC)) 20 -KB FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS • • • - - (PLE-AS E.PRJW4) •L E-MAIL J)1)RESS Kristy Bada Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 ext. 6218 kristvbada c miamibeachfl.•ov j/9116..s 7etJt-T4.54 5/3 es4s / 0 05 17,6 . c rn I L. /1/74-re-c, (454-it's os 6-"" "44 62-0171 ,...-, •cc. gi112/P' 7,7cleiyo c .9)5f4e—.61. A-774,7,d>0 4<k. c2k ovaIoI )4 1P- diLLz ci Eb7s1 Evij' Com tkrif ce, ( 11 Lyle_ 670 re AC, Ci& • 0.4 Ch 01hpv • 1 1J1 � - f MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February23, 2017 0,38)-g-S �� �D TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) - 03-KB FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON ,AN "AS t�• S j �, '.�.^.� h:.• �+4 x rr.L .X.NJ.~.•.I'.�-r t r••,747!!" '�_i 'y'1J` __ Twt.. � om �^'. -••t1: r�f•.r ,�: V:V - ^:' r$7'- - .rig: •l .y A Y. .5!! `HG�r.4-y ..r - � .. .tom ,..► ���., �S,Y` '•'^' � ., J ^X''• - •.i.: 't •a-�..J y •�. 2�> si•' '�.y. ..• r :�• ay•til.„:� v . - 1 � '<... .t... i•t j� Oj\.i.f -'.r"t''+C f .,i'.�r,;�: �<�•i 1l!•. ` �/ JAS .■■■�1�( , • [\Y'`'.! • fir. } - r ..-v. ,. .,... .�.,,... .....:.......,...::.._... w,.'.. i.? ...t•. �, ..r , !•+. .a,,v _ �. ► -_ - .t. ,�� ?' u.pro.. - 10:5-‘, 14.2:714 °I4.1 -3,-; I-i-e 67fre---e.e7v4• We- Ativie 4-- A. 1 / of)v d4din 7 a 4 ..e.c. . As ‘4, /ova/ Me/2.7 (-76,mez m e z ) co Pi 305-308-4,6: ,„ • RF5copsmt.60,4,0pet-a-z. *131%1 3ar-lk ' v)f)‘ e. 0 S k-uv. f\ (... d 4 pkv\ etwe - 265-(c-3644-51- e441Z-6 ce.AA 1 . ee (it u Ib' - ear) Oolihre on-zre 1 6 zle.eifilt,,c Ohl • 1 2 f\A 1 Atv\ I B E AC 1.-1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 st)1-7-0;g-a TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2.Qj G,20.12,•043-3403 FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION • (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS - 'r' ..... e ' SAME I�ir . ,.e - . : - H 04.N E#.:; FAx# a rt9 . E� 1 c,f5/6� >>6 OZ -- eliPcr . corn Pel �o =�` �Z --531-Tc Z 14Orck 2 b .)24 04 tacT) /4,A,4; . • ' (NAIVAA A KA 4-.k CA,`‘4_ v .(1(1\ t v\_.01 C__ AkYy A\A-T1 \A 0..k‹S Y\t'1/4-/ 736•2y67/3l e JL5.W�fi � I I• ii 3 IV\IANAIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 ,?O17-028`� TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 20 - B FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS .'. 1-:'''''''- ::-.*:''''''-&.::Aitift ..-': ':1:1-:-. '-- Ntt (PL��S�Y12I;rT) i. ' _ PH{)�tE# FIX# E-MAIL ADb�tESS KreA.Ttzsr itkat::› ..1,4-11%17-S FIC � olf.-- C��: AC.0 co����G K9c-LA . d ' 01 tiatZie C IUd a ►A. Payi'cufey plstOr i o A &Iar NDS- (0.1 - , C10,01k He p6trn sP6A-r\ ti (om ).---1 0 D h..,_k c".s i-....,„.,,, tz.,..;\-L 4 PcSsoc:).: 3 0 5 IAN c.0%A /� 667-S��y eon,ko 1A4L-cl-fsac;,\-ts.cm,Li\ \.(\,(11ctC.- C --) ( 0 m\,) \--\-cM 5 3oi 8alaaa . ) \-0,bz-----ec-Q) ( (\sv11,(06'N , kle/51.ovl ale,-1,- A,fiAaisviipo,frni.i0 e475.6 . Oafel-cgdi://lia_ 4.2,ki 30,-.. . te.„-1/7,.. , i dN,"C' C. `� �1%J.0 (4-LaA,410 qt,e_tc q-Zikt:e %t-L-Q., &? C._TE,to„ (..$)512-1J-el T.Po& -� 5r4/j�2--� a.,�� � ``°�`' '7 86.25 f 5 3°, 6 el us.zep V 6 Lo r a , 600.., cipm NO`0714.--ApLEAOA rue Fa‘). 6;, 6gu *2, , 1 e.r.-.z-/--2a0/ . v-PcirQ,zie. ermiiiri, tarn JOS6 t1 -A,JP cAP "6") 66‘11Ajelijt (7 6)"4 - NI rat mild& e...._ 4 ;,/0-, , 93/cr . 1 ' t-0-7,- , 4 ar;,1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Hoor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 30, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 10, 2017,. at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautionedto plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any qregarding re ardin this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro sal. n -rely Nig/ (exInis ro• rement Director it 1 ADDENDUM NO.4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS P MIAMEBEACH _ , City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued ;i by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). ,' 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Thursday, April 6, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any qregarding re ardin this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(a�miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part .of your RFP submission. • Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete . and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a prop sal. S. e Iy, / .' , II Al Deri.s P ocu r: , ent Director 1 ADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS , • MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www,miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017-028-KB ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDEPROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued y by the City. The RFP is amended in the followingparticulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Thursday, April 5th, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Latero osals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow p p for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any qregarding re ardin this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gOv. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Si ` Ale Denis If Pro ent Director ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS M I AM1 BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 21, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 3rd, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. • A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS • RECEIVED. • Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a and return the "Notice to Prospective proposal. Si - Ale D= is urement Director 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI)FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED"BASIS REQUEST FOS QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ) PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 2017-028-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: MARCH 27, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMI BEACH KRISTY BADA, CONTRACTING OFFICER III PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 I www.miamibeachfl.gov kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov CA n TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 17 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 36 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 38 RFQ 2017-028-KB 2 ISA SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ)is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving requiredscope the of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (wwN.oublicourchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. Adequate management of construction projects by City of Miami Beach departments requires implementation of Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services during construction. The ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these services for various City departments would enable the City to effectively and efficiently manage the construction phase of these projects. The scope of services describes and defines the CEI services which are required for contract administration, inspection, and materials sampling and testing for the construction projects. The Purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to qualify Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) firms to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis. Additionally, the terms "FIRM", "PROPOSER", "CONSULTANT," "PRIME PROPOSER"are used interchangeably and shall refer to the firm that will contract with the City for the performance consultant services and work for the project. "As needed" basis means that each firm awarded a contract pursuant to this RFQ will be placed on a professional CEI list where the City may call upon it to perform professional projects, as assigned by the City Administration. As the need for services arise, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as-needed basis. This RFQ is not governed by the requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued February 10, 2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting February 23, 2017 at 10:00am Deadline for Receipt of Questions March 17, 2017 at 5:00pm Responses Due March 27, 2017 at 3:00pm Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD RFQ 2017-028-KB 3 3EACH Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA aBMIAMIBEACHFL.GOV additionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.gov: or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely RFQ 2017-626-KB 4 tri responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: htta://web.mlam'beachfl.cov brocuremen 'scroll.asox?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS..... CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE .. CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES .. CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10.COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all,applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. RFQ 2017-028-KB 5 trci BEACH 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters(five(5)days in advance when possible),or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 &2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City,or it may also reject all Proposals. �Q 2017-028-KB b trA ' ' Yay 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Rejection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. RFO 2017-0f8-KB 7 26. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for,or on account of, any copyrighted, patented,or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. RFC) 20 1 7-OA-KB A-KB 8 . BEACH 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation;then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. RFQ 2017-O2g-KB 9 BEACH 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with,all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services andlor project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. RFQ 2617-O 8-d 10 --- BEAC- 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases,the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFC 2017-026-KB 11 4.' BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents.The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun&Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servletiSupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2017-028-KB 12 k s BEACH TAB 3 Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). FQ 2017-028-KB 13 C_1 BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step I & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement Management to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 5 RFQ 2017-028-KB 14 BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission,which may be different than final ranking results. ��Q 217-OA-IAB 15 APPENDIX A m ,it\A ' AN\ B EAC H Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 6f7-MB-KB 16 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED"BASIS Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7490 kristybada a@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 201 7-02 a-Kg 17 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. RFQ 2017-028-KB 18 7. Living Wage.Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive,and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017-02g-KB 19 9. • Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 237.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1,2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 _ Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2017-6n-KB 20 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on thesb contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFC 2017-028-KB 21 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation,and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA } On this day of ,20_,personally } appeared before me who County of } stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: . RFQ 201 7'-O -KB 22 APPENDIX B ID it\A 1 A i\A B E AC H ,.... • " No Bid " Form RFQ No. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) , FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "As NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 ��:#Fk"..5e�s'�"a".�#`"$r'°i6 "t$°ao� fa�,ro� ',.,a�:�adxF.�s.».,,:�a.3 .Cal:.,•�:,n+.r aw,:�8".,ti>�s�.�.e�•.,;�ro�Gr,a34.ini'Sn ^k"k;Y�e,d!'3,.a:w�.w .�.,a•x. R e: en far thou vendors who hove received notification a� ....s+�%J .wa.,.>a•�,..,�a«,. ,;:t•�a.a... bill •.",i@';-.,..,.''...'.... x,o, iespond, "�th olicitation i havedecided t complete and submit t aT� 4 �zwx' x., �. ,.,�,. :P "Statement N Bid Theemen Bid" provides 9.s Ihe a,.:City inorm tion how improve the solicitation process. :•P'ailurse to en NoBid may result in not being notified 'I—PFQ 26 T7-02 -1 )E3 23 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive _Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements _Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Kristy Bada STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2017-003-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2617-028-KB 24 APPENDIX C (14 NA AM BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Rk) /0 TY�28-KB 25 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Bidder (defined as the Firm) shall provide a minimum of five (5) references providing professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities in the last ten(10)years. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email)and prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The Consultant's Basic Services that may be provided under the Agreement entered into pursuant to this RFQ shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to,the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (PIO) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc. may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utility owners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) Estimating Services: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule slips. Prepare cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost- related aspects of engineering and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/cost assessment, design-to-cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, address REQ 2017-028-KB 26 residents' concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre-Construction Meetings:The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre-Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre-construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice-to-Proceed to the Contractor. f) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, PIO, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discuss potential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. g) Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors".The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the City's guidelines. i) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required,the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. j) Daily Reports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant RrQ 2017-O2A-KB 27 construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review. The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily reports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job-site, general field observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of(potential)disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of(potential)disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non-Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on-going construction documentation, and ending with post-construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-BuilderTm, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-Builder' document management system on a weekly basis. I) Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that a RFQ 2617-0ftd 28 submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non-Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e-BuilderT"", the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderT"', the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non-complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre-Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Coordinator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Coordinator and shall issue a written Non-compliance Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Coordinator shall issue a Non- compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. p) Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. q) Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderT"", the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or RFQ 201 7-0f8-KB 29 negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFls/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design 9 Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response in to RFIs and CDCs a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-Builder", the City's • document management system. s) Schedule:Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e. baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as-built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, , resource durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign-off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewingwith the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details p t s relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing are mark-ups properly p P p Y maintained by the Contractor. The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient.The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non-safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: RFC 201/-Of8-KB 30 • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. g • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concern and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing verbally. verbal) . • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency/condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. tY • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction-related accident, Consultant shall notify the Cityof the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a forwardedP copy to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice-to-Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor'suali q tY control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for eachP hase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibilityof the Contractor; , however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional PP construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the1 ro'ect schedule in accordance P o dance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports Re orts which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Design Contractor shall provide the Consultant, Cityand Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre-Construction Meetingfor general informationresponsibility purposes. It shall be the Consultant's to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa) Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the Cityfor issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory 9 ry inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb) Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. umul—P FQ 201 31 If the Consultant is in to agree on a schedule agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through"inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, prepare and a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This masterP unch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the Ci tY to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring q g completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of eachPro'Ject which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder,as required q by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for eachPro'1ect for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once allarties determine the work isP complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd) Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended to provide support to both the City and the Design Consultant duringthe construction h phase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Coordinator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design concept and p constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR canP rovide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carryout its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names ofpersonnel proposed for assignment . p p g ment to the project, including a detailed resume for each. The City reserves the right to have Consultant's personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct orerformance is detrimentalP to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of fieldP ersonnel. 4. The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providingservicespursuant to this Agreement . g ent. Significant changes to the work requirements may require the Consultant to revise the QA Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work requirements. RFQ 2017-028-KB 32 The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationshipto thepart of the organization g zatfon performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. 9 q • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained duringthe execution of QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City'sprocedures. rocedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by organization anization g (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found,and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation th gat occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by Agreement. reement. 9 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 9 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review — The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in Ya 99 negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare androcess the required documentationp q to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and 9 g inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right-of-Way construction projects. RFQ 20 1,-ON8-kB 33 APPENDIX D A /\ I AM B EAC H Special Conditions RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201 -02B-k8 34 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3)years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two(2)additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. RFQ 'bf?-028-KB 35 APPENDIX E m /\ /\ IAM I B EAC H Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 26I,-028-KB 36 Ai A \ I L4 / i INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutorylimits of the state of Florida. a. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability$ 1,000,000.00 occ rperoccurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and P p Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow therima coverages. P ry XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liabilitypolicies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ 00 Liquor Liability $ 00 Fire Legal Liability $ 00 Protection and Indemnity $ 00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any applicable a licabie Statutes. RFQ 2017-028-KB 37 APPENDIX F /V\ I AM i B EAC H Contract RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-028-I:B 38 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDEVARIOUS CEi SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-028-KB DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RFQ 2017-028-KB 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 41 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 46 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES. 50 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 52 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 52 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 53 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 54 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 55 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 55 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 55 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 57 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 57 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 58 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 58 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 58 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 59 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 63 SCHEDULE B 65 SCHEDULE C 67 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 68 ATTACHMENT B 69 ATTACHMENT C 70 FQ 2017-62 -d 40 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), byand between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation havingits principal office at (hereinafter referred to as p Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in q RFQ); and Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the ), the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in WHEREAS, accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No. respectively, authorizingthe City to enter into negotiations with and, if P y, successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services i in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the g Consultantperform,shall at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. RFQ 2017-028-KB 41 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not beP art of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies havingjurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualifiedproperly and professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required byentities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional qany jurisdiction or anizations with governing the professional practice area for which the design professional g has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants RFQ 2017-028-d 42 acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record"for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by anyother entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, g overnmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing theP rofessional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates theP articular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager er reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (LTB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order (s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or anyduly other licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. rFQ 201,--026-1B 43 DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance- oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, 1 configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final g preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performingany obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, Y the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. FQ 0 f 7-O 8-d 44 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A- Consultant Service Order Schedule B-Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C-Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The• "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: 'Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. RFQ 20 17-b28-KB 45 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida: Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and RFQ 201 7-0 -RB 46 Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment(i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In FQ 201 7-0 ,E3-KN 47 addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (I) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to krQ2O17-O8-K 48 promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. lf, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. RFQ 20 f 7-018-kB 49 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3, THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and RFQ 201 -0�8-I11E3 50 acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission RFQ 2017-0A-KB 51 on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator(which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. RFQ 201 7Y-OM-KE; 52 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts(except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). RFQ 2017-026A 53 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached- hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by RFQ 201 -MA-KB$-KB 54 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its RFQ 2017-O 8-K 55 performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or(3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without [imitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. FQ 2017-026-KA 56 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by.this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. R FQ 2O 17-O 8-KB 57 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registeredP rofessionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized zed by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s)actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: tFQ 2017-02 -KB 58 City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida,oif in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act 287.133, (Section Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant RFQ 2017-628-R 59 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company P Y or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, ercenta e P 9 , gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making Agreement.this A reement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by Applicable A licable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Proiect Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and .its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents togging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents preparedg by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. FQ 2017-028-KB 60 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties onlyand it does notgrant rights to 9 a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of anyrightsdamages to dams es herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall beP redicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. �FQ 2017-028-KE 61 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name FQ 2017-028-KB 62 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND • FQ 2017-0f8-KB 63 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. - for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017-028-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: • Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date RFC) 2017-028-KB 64 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of eachp hase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, p er month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. kFQ 2017-028-KB 65 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017-08-k7 66 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS RFQ 2017-0'18-K� 67 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM RFQ 2017-02M 68 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) RFQ 2017-028-KB 69 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ RFQ 2017-628-KB 70 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 46 . . ....... • Corp.A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers, . City of Miami Beach I Request for Qualifications(REP) Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI)firms to provide ..,.., - r VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN um NEEDED N BASIS ,,.,.. • , ,.,.. , .. . ,.. ,,...,,;,,..,_,,,,,., ,,„„,- . ,w,v,J, ,,lk-4 I .,. ..,.7., .,.. , RFQ NO.:2011-028-KB ..„, -.... ....., \,.. I,. ......, I If .. .. . • -.,. ..,.. ,..,, ,i,i. / . .• , . , •, 4,..;,r,• .--,-• '8* .,- , . . ,. .. : .. . ., . .. , • . . .., .4. ) _ ...... .• „.. . .., ..,_,, ... 4. ' I i 4.-., .. . . . , 141 • 4 ...,,- I . • lin i - - . % -i.4-. f - . ..,,,,,_ ........... . at if .. i .-_,....., Tik- II . •_....__ ort _ isa -, , •. ... .•-,.. di , .. . 7 1.4 . -,----,-T-4 ., _. ..... . — i --- ----- ' al L---_-:---..-....._,_._.,.____ • . t •__._.....................__ •• ...:_.-...-.7,..;.a.,,-7 . 'a. . 7 .... _._ . .. .N 1 . ._. . ....,, , , . , ... ,,, A. , . - ---- -'. - ..., ...4,41..„.„ ,.. 7.-..--,..1 L ,:,, ,....,.. „,,jidrip, , ,.....,............ ....... ..........,.,,........ . _ ____ •P''.., 4 .".. '.I. ' '''...:',..e;:..4--,.., .. . I • ...—. _____ ......„.. .1.- -;,;,.•:•-•••• - i• .: — i!_•.• . I -".' \ Ak. ,.....,.. . . ..,... . _4,..........7.7.-...._-...-;-.-4, -,... •-,. :,'--..!.: ,t...c. • ;.. - . . 4 -- •,, :,.. ....,--,,,, . __,,, .„.„,„„,..._ ...... ,, . . . , . .7 ,,....., jit'4, •v`i. r 6:1 --.' ''..-". -4?-• :' ,..........'.:t,....,..4.... ',........,“- ,.it, i 4. ..,.!,...„6.... ",.. ‘"e-Iiiii,,,,,:*-r's. . :*.-, •••''' . . • i.-. ,--7,- . -•-','.‘.1!A`,... .,;as. -• -'t,i; 4,, .j'•47,'•.............-- -tc4,..-.~. ..... - • ,,,,.-.. ..."":"......,—,..51t:art i• -:1.1,. ....',..ZiP,....:. .....---.:-.:.',. i '--:-----4Z' .• -.4.,*,;az, , '''.. .k.;,:‘1::Itii,c'',1:,, '')A,;+1,•:401, " '.,.''':-.-'t...:• -. ,„,, . :::. ...:-:".ii * ' , -...... ) •IIMIINNIIIID........... . . -7...:.„it,. ..,....v.'14.kl. yr.?4,..--....414;,:',04,....., Pr' 7,....7!'.::../ ' .0:-`,:, ' '.... ' -„,',1 , - .1', mimmimmillimmor i • 4 ' -' --............— ... .-"-';'.1.. — -.',....- s' ''''-•".71P:.'...7.1.''' ' 1: —I: ;*:',71.V4 --,'-, ..,... -.....,...- .....•-4,:1/4;.. .- - 4.---,.. .4.-- . -.--....';'-... '.. ."-t• :-• ..... .. ... ,' - ....,.--;..,:t... --4.4.,--..,:,- "- • '..!,:_e......,.'..- ........,,,,..:...,,,,..i• • ''''Aa.:-... :• 'ia. -"' .'..N.• ''';''''R: , ''''. a f '- • ...ia,. ille '7, —.. • ••..,....i.. • .4,•••••,..... ..•• •.1-..,...: :.,,,..,4 •-: 0 , • T.I, I . 7,,,ea.....1,, •1.,, 7..--,-- , ' 1/4-NS.. '..i.NI.J.aaL%-*4-_,LY.,113,:-.74....•• ,,...., -.4; II ...'i-- -'r--"-'-'.- • - .--.,,, '.7'47". .". ., .... ... or .4. •'t; - '4 .1 •••• -—•• •••• • , • • ,•: '0'. '••••••. W .4-........,-;1,. -.4%;.,,%licZo...'tki \ •i.,;:-....,--...• • •,•••, • ....: c '•Tr'',-•.,,TIZip?.‘._ :, . • !!!i i a.t :. -k, '.- �* 1 , ,,' I `i ,y l= Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection(CEI)firms tr `` " -- :�sr `�- to provide various CEI Services on an"as needed"basis -'-- fir; ,, :,' iiiiigo;;Z March 27th,2017 City of Miami Beach RE: Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection City Hall (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an Procurement Division-Third Floor "As Needed" Basis 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL(33139) Dear Ms. Kristy Bada and Selection Committee Members: The scope, magnitude, and importance of the above mentioned project to the City of Miami Beach and in particular to the residents of Miami Beach requires a comprehensive CEI Project Team with the needed experience, awareness of local issues,and specialized skills to perform the necessary construction inspections and contract administration. For these reasons, the A&P Team appreciates this opportunity and takes great pleasure in submitting this technical proposal. We are submitting one original, 10 bound copies, and one CD copy of the entire Technical Proposal as our response to the RFQ. We trust that our submission is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the City's instructions. Our Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services division has 27 employees, of which 12 are graduate Civil Engineers including 5 Licensed Professional Engineers in the State of Florida, fully dedicated to provide Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI), Construction Management (CM), and Resident Project Representative (RPR) services.APCTE has over 20 inspectors with a large majority of the required Construction Training Qualification Program (CTQP) courses required by the Florida Department of Transportation and otherg overnmental agencies such as the City of Miami Beach. Our proposed CEI team is very much committed to the opportunity ui serving iy ii this Right-of vvcty Improvement iprovei i Bei it r i UJCLts for the City ui iviiami Beach. We have spent a considerable amount of time preparing for this RFQ. As a result, the APCTE Team is confident in the capabilities of our local and experienced staff which we have brought together for this project.A&P has provided CEI/RPR services for several projects to the City of Miami Beach over the past eleven (11) years; we are a team that is very familiar with the City of Miami Beach (CMB) and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) specifications and procedures. Teaming partner Media Relations Group, LLC (MRG) was selected due to its consistent record of performance in past projects. MRG's Principal Oscar Gonzalez has previous experience in providing Public Involvement Services to the City of Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).We have also team up with New Millennium Engineering, Inc.and F&J Engineering Group, Inc.,both of these firms specialize in CEI Services in the Miami Dade County area. • It is important to note that to lead this effort we have selected Mr.Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.- Project Manager- who has an outstanding record with the City of Miami Beach. Carlos has over thirty (30) years of progressive engineering and management experience and has excellent oral and written skills. He will be supported by a g g carefully selected Project Administrators, Senior Inspectors, and Inspectors staff for this project that has the experience and expertise to work in a challenging urban environment like the City of Miami Beach. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. DPW.., ' , it i 1, , ..:7,-.,,,e---,-. .4 --vv.:. 'y '"; Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection(CEI)firms F ' - ...�- . e• - 1 Asa- - to provide various CEI Services on an as needed"basis Why the APCTE CEI Team should be favorably considered: Significant Urban Roadway Design and CEI/RPR Experience: APCTE has completed Resident Project Representative Services for some of the most challenging urban roadway projects in South Florida in recent years, such as the Washington Avenue Neighborhood Improvements in the heart of South Beach, 44th Street g Drainage Improvements, Harding Avenue Improvements, Muss Park, Indian Creek, and FDOT roadway p reconstruction of NW 25th Street.These types of projects offered the same type of challenges expected by the City of Miami Beach for this contract. FamiliarityCity with the of Miami Beach: APCTE has extensive knowledge of the City of Miami Beach Policies and Procedures through our involvement in five (5) Neighborhood City projects, including: Washington Avenue, Neighborhood No. 7 — Nautilus Infrastructure Improvements, Lummus Neighborhood g g Improvements, Flamingo,and Biscayne Point. Strong Project Manager with Relevant Experience:Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E. is one of our outstanding Senior Project Managers who has managed similar type projects in the past. Strong Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan: Our QA/QC CEI/RPR Plan uses the best management practices. All deliverables to the City of Miami Beach (CMB) will be subjected to the strictest company rules for QA/QC. Our inspection and observation program, QA/QC reviews, and the internal p Y administrative operations are consistent with the FDOT and CMB critical construction requirements for all contractor activities. Our Commitment: APCTE is respected for meeting all deadlines and established schedules. The APCTE team is committed to providingthe City of Miami Beach with a CEI Team capable of surpassing the levels of satisfaction expected by the City.We emphasize the importance of completing our job with excellence,and place priority to the needs of our clients. We want to be an extension of the City of Miami Beach's staff for this project, and an integral piece of a quality product.We look forward to the opportunity of working with you and your staff. Sincerely, A&, Insulting Tr 'Sporta4Engineering,Corp. ( '-- --- " ' 7 Vs -� (—) 1' Antonio G.Acosta, P.E.,C.G.C. President u A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Cover Letter and M n mu Qualification Requirements 1.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. NAME OF PROPOSER: A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. (APCTE) PROPOSER PRIMARY CONTACT: Antonio G.Acosta,P.E. ADDRESS OF SUBMITTING PROPOSER: 10305 NW 41 Street,Suite 115 Doral,Florida 33178 EMAIL ADDRESS OF SUBMITTING PROPOSER: agacosta@apcte.corn PHONE NUMBER AND FACSIMILE NUMBER FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSER: Phone: (305) 592-7283 Cell: (305) 219-4718 Fax: (305) 593-1594 FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSER: FEIN#65-0770583 DECLARATION REGARDING COMPANY ORGANIZATION: A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. (APCTE) is a Corporation in the State of Florida SIGNATURE OF-.AN OFFICER OF THE SUBMITTING PROPOSER: ( i PRINTED NAME OF THE AUTHORIZED SIGNED OFFICER: Antonio G.Acosta, P.E.,C.G.C. TITLE OF THE AUTHORIZED SIGNING OFFICER: President DATE OF SIGNATURE April 7th,2017 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE AND REQUIRED AFFIDAVIT(APPENDIX A) Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. Please find on the following pages the fully completed and executed Affidavit(Appendix A)as requested on the RFQ. AQP Consulting Transportation.Engineers,Corp. Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7490 kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. No of Years in Business: 22 years No of Years in Business Locally: 22 years OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 10305 NW 41 Street, Suite 115 CITY: Doral STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33178 TELEPHONE NO.: 305-592-72831 305-219-4718 TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: 305-593-1594 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10305 NW 41 Street, Suite 115 CITY: Doral STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Antonio G. Acosta ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-592-7283 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: 0- ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: agacosta@apcte.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 65-0770583 The City reserves the right to seek additional'information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. All r RF � 71", 7 17 1. Veteran Owned Business. Is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES xX NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates None of the APCTE employees or immediate family memoer of our employees is an employee of the City of Miami leach.No employee of the City of Miami Beach owns either directly any interest in APCTE or anv of our affiliates. 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? • YES xx NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall subject any and sanctions, v.v..v of the v.��v v.a...�\r..M./Finance Reform Vl tl l I\.t �V are complied with,and shall be to any all sanctions, IV61 1 as prescribed therein,including disqualificationVof their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. (Included at the end of this affidavit) 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City.shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. (Included at the end of this affidavit) 1 8-KB R 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/'hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? xx YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? xx YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health xx xx Sick Leave xx xx Family Medical Leave xx xx Bereavement Leave xx xx If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurements. 77M<77177.1. 19 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City Proposals all Pro osals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed 4Uy and construed in accordance with the laws of the Late of Florida. REQ X01 -0 8-KB 21 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Antonio G.Acosta, P.E. President 1 � Signature of Prop er's Authorized Repr 6ntative: 1 Date: Lk(A.,-/-, h� 3-20-2017 . L-114-\,..._, State of FLORIDA On this 2Oday of r11C1t/I'7,2017,personally appeared before me who County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President of APCTE , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its bo rd of direct r%ajd ackno, -dged said instrument to be its voluntary act and dee . Be'.re q i f i i 1 f i 4,0 A0,, Notary Public State of Florida I / vc;/ �` :� 'F: Giset Fernandez-Aoeia x tblic for the State f23)• ori '��-- �, My CommCornrnis�ien FF o2f3a8 � 7� .�1op€�.r Expires 07/2312017 Dnmission Expires: ) . kFQ 2617-028-KB 22 AguilWW NOW41 ,.. 4 � Cover Letter _ � �- � , .. ..- and Minimun Qualiica ion Requirements 1.2 APPENDIX A- QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Page 18 Number 5 -vendor Campaign Contributions: APCTE is financially controlled by four Partners,Mr.Antonio G.Acosta, P.E.,Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.,Arnelio Alfonso, P.E.,and Eithel M.Sierra, P.E. None of the four partners of the entity itself have contributed to the campaign either directly or in-directly,of a candidate who has been elected to the Office of Major or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Page 18 Number+6-Code of Business Ethics: APCTE will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 2 All01 E: NGINEERS March 4,2017 Kristy Bada City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RE: Request for Qualification No.2017-028-KB-Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an"As Needed" Basis Dear Ms Bada, A&P Consulting Transportation Engineer's,Corp.is financially controlled by four Partners, Mr.Antonio G.Acosta, P.E.,Carlos M.Gil-Mera,P.E.,Arnelio Alfonso,P.E.,and Eithel M.Sierra,P.E.None of the four partners or the entity itself have contributed to the campaign either directly or in-directly,of a candidate who has been elected to the Office of Major or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Respectfully Yours. Antonio G.Acosta, P.E.-President [f f �a r �+ �i '~ i€ !-G ~ ':r '1. -"!. f ;i•1 ': J/ »._ :.., ;'1. ♦a%' . .�... `t f ,1,1 : :. w !`: R G Media Relations.Group, LLC Alicia Ana Gonzalez Principal 18001 Old Cutler Road,Suite 459 Palmetto Bay,Florida 33157 Telephone 305 254 8598 Cellular 786 280 6645 Fax 305 256 1613 agonzalez@mrgmiami.com April 6, 2017 Media Relations Group, LLC is financially controlled by two Partners, Alicia Gonzalez and Oscar Gonzalez. None of the two partners or the entity itself have contributed to the campaign either directly or in-directly, of a candidate who has been elected to the Office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Res e tfu I ly Yours, (/ ( ,/41 Alicia Gonzalez—Pr i'd� NEW '.'•04.0% MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED March 28, 2017 Kristy Bada City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 RE: Request for Qualification No. 2017-028-KB - For Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an "As Needed" Basis Dear Ms. Bad a: The following Principals of New Millennium Engineering, Inc. have not directly or indirectly contributed to the campaign of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Steve McCue, P.E. David Tinder,P.E. Geoffrey Parker,P.E. Eugenio Ochoa,P.E. Sincerely, NEW MILJ^U NGINEERING, INC. Steve McCue,P.E. Principal 4868 SW 72nd Avenue,Miami,Florida 33155 Phone 305.667.4772 Fax 305.667.1790—www.nmdceng.net iiiimmossim FJENGINEERING r c tJT=om Statement on Vendor Campaign Contributions Vendor Campaign Contributions - The following is the F&J Engineering Group statement regarding campaign contributions: Francis R. Chin Jr, President—Mr.Chin has not contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. / 77 ' 7 Francis R. Chin Jr/ President 8761 N. Lake Dasha Dr., Plantation, Florida 33324.Off-786.600.3321 •Fax-786.866.9382•www.fj-group.com . ,- ' ", , .. , , , ,, , . MinimurnE igi4 7,4 _ , , , .. . . , i . " 1 4.8 _ � , , , . . R7 t. 0 IP .. .• `t: -- ; '� t. .' r :, ,. il:.., 1 •iii{ r \iv' .;- •• per r'. • .t+ 4 f. r' j i 1taik • i 0 ' 1 , • - '„i H 4 .,/, , ..,, :. 16 --- ,, ,,kw,8--, I v .., ...rI,; e • • ..,..,, ,,,, , "„,-?) . e ,,,, ,o. _ \ , le' • , 4• 4. ,,,t.f . , . , 7----... ,, , ,i,, • ,'� / .1 y By/ fil r i :. Er?! • .. -43, .. i i r .1. lial. --. A..... 1 • 7-1 -tie .....IP • .. a 1AT . -- -, ,x an - --.-- I 1 1 I I . - 1: *-..L A''.!. t------ ' A 0 i i 1..„„ 4 -lc • ... . 1 \ail 7 romi fit ---. _ -, .. . 1 :1-0111111k ___, _14 .N —- :V ._ .. , . lit - 4- 1 \ .-4. .„,,, . , ti ,1_ ,...•... _ - ,.t.r ;- _. _ t _ ,. ~mss , • . •,, ..--,..... ,,,,,. -...... . ,•11.>• '• �,�. ire•:4,....""-. t } )'•fI I .,�,i y �t♦��••.0,..:, 1 _ fir• - i ;.,"1•'• ..-. �f• .•'1:'.-•^+♦► r► -,Ar. -. • t :aa• ._ ,..11••'•16...*. ' rr -' , •• .w•• .• •♦-••, --!�! • `.0• .tie .‘,61'.'''t4:.‘ '1/1 •.... • •�• • tigl, '` 'v• ivy' .......1. • 1 f• __ ♦.•./- • • U '^ * • • T , • y� I� -^ _'r •p n •y � '-- •• •. -•.--... -:'4,110,..,41 -••w! � • - -, _I ..,;•,,-,,:-. 9„,,, L•- s„,-- ....151,, ,,F#')- ,.yO.7.1, `t... '+ • . '� `,:,: ,.�.�+ly _ • ;'. ' ...9 AP..._ Ii• S.....:-.'?...%;-,',„,-.•` w- `7'• .�+�♦''..�Tv.� • -.` _-� i �.��' � �s t%F � _'t �J�. �►"yam►.••��r�r}�� • • •+..•" •9• �l. �+"M.. �°ti. .,4 M -S -moi.: „„ .Ai• .•• -7-----,11-0, ''"�. 1.- +� ~,• s .R yi�i. •w,+ ',�,4• •'4' Y r "..•v. .n,.'..+ �+ �� �' • • �' N .r- ''t.. d'1•4._�% i.}3- Wi'P'p . •.:�a.__ ,,r•.\,y,•s�••_ .,w ., ,►.:,. "-.a .. ..'.C.1.4..... : : wL./w. _. . • �• 7-., 4.- � """'+a\ _R. •#+`�. a:!�ia• .. art. 1 1 ,• �►.-... ...~,-�y ►`�"-.. L•�-.r•� �. A&P ConsultingTransportation Engineers, Corp.. See Attached Qua!ifQualifying Projects including: (project name, project description, commencement and completion dates project contact information (phone and email)and prime proposer's role in project). IRglaiti itr i. -- .44!':1, ---',2:'tr..;.- k . : '',r ;ir, 1-; , 7 A '' .0 1 :� Project Reference f 1� �� ---. - .. -.,...r-; R+. ............+........�.....,.....,,�,...m.�,....,. .w,.... ..w.+..«.................«.,,w+...w„w.+.«..,..w...w,....w.w«.r...+.+...w....+.rr..M.............•. _ — 4 ' A&P Consulting z L,i;C v . PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR NEIGBORHOOD NO.7-NAUTILUS IMPROVEMENTS CUENT NAME City of Miami Beach,CIP Office Jose Perez, P.E. Q o Phone No.:(305)673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z Z 6115 O — email:joseperez@miamibeachfl. U COMPLETION DATE April 2010 gov PROJECT LOCATION Nautilus Neighborhood,"Middle Beach"from Surprise Lake south,to the south end of 41st Street Right-of-Way,and from Biscayne Bay east to the Indian Creek Waterway,City of Miami Beach,Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Nautilus Neighborhood included all of the area from Surprise Lake .,- ' , , . 1111 .-7E-":'...q--4j • • south,to the south end of the 41st Street right-of-way,and from Biscayne }r`.� .�-I ,- _____Y 11* _ = rt Bay east to the Indian Creek waterway, inclusive of the Orchard Park a�..- . , , }.._ - 416.6„,, sub-neighborhood.The area is generally comprised of single-family resi- : ., - .� ::,� dential streets with some pockets of multi-family uses. �- - Also responsible for the office administration construction progress -o--•� `' -OR.. \--, ...: activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improve- -'=, ,. ..--'=-:\- ^ . - .,4:1ment project. Some of the construction management services pro- ' _: * ` mil ..� vided for this project included:Weekly construction meeting; Per- -- .. --, ..,-•: '4'1.'....-4,..:-..F.1.„. �n, _ .it form all shop drawing program functions; Respond to request for a - . -__ - ..__. ..,,,,..-:. information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to project sched- ' , -•-• - ., •�� — ,- "..:-- ules•Contract documents clarifications;Inspect MOT operations;and . . O. Review,track and maintain construction schedules. Extensive utility ;. - µ 4,„, - \ t ' 4, coordination was performed. ._" a ` �' j -iir, :::, ..:,. -::, -- - 1.. 2'A- J11_ ,_ , ,.. 4.:,1-4-1, .....t t. - A' fil I r ''''' ,..,,,*; .1 '.e. vr''.41°.1-. ' ,ivir...4,-r/r w/ ,.-. (r 1PF �I�Y� r .. -- • . `- rte\. ' KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M.Gil-Mera, RE. (Project Manager), Eithei Sierra, P.E. (Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering), Arnelio Alfon- & Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hard- so, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Pipe- scape , Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pave- line), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration,Juan C. ment Markings,Construction Management,etc. Velazquez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 4 lielia., '' , ' . . r ._.: 'f= ,F. Jr � -'' 1 A wr _ + es• .. . ir•lit.* . ,,A.- , Project Reference . .! .._ _ -- Jw , •---- A&P Consulting '- , 7.,. ' :KK ( c.','.. PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 1 -BISCAYNE POINT/BISCAYNE BEACH CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach,OP Office Carla Dixon Q Phone No.:(305)673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z z 7071 o - email:carladixon@miamib- COMPLETION DATE June 2014 eachfl.gov PROJECT LOCATION Biscayne Point Neighborhood"North Beach"area is bounded by Stillwater Drive to the north, Biscayne Point Island to the south,and Biscayne Beach to the east,City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Prepared construction documents (plans and specifications) for the following improvements: develop new typical section and roadway plans for Stillwater Drive,provide edge of pavement profile(EOP),lon- gitudinal profile of the three hot spots at Biscayne Point Island, new ,, . y drainage system with deep underground gravity well structures at : . .: M..','..,- -.- �-- ° "' = ""�" Stillwater Drive and Biscayne Beach,as well as the drainage design for <, :- ::-„ ,- --: : -_ , =� -~ r�, three hot spots at Biscayne Point,water main upgrades,new decorative •i ~, -. lighting system at Stillwater Drive, landscape and irrigation upgrades, :r , T . _ t . . update signing and pavement markings for the three sub-neighbor- -,, --.14-a—a- . •'- hoods.Also responsible for the office administration construction '" - - P ,,,,,„ _" .. progress activities related to the construction of this right-of-way -- :�.,' :N , improvement project. Some of the construction management = .:" 7.- - `' -7 services provided for this project included:Weekly construction _ -- .- • .t„e �` .- �- meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; Respond .- . • -1. .. a%'! .y , •11. to request for information (RFI s), Evaluate Request for changes V—A...:—____ 44:- .... to project schedules; Contract documents clarifications; Inspect .-- ._ .�..- -�_ 2,5i,...:,--_, ,, ,., MOT operations; and Review, track and maintain construction ' .� '-r• - - .- `° 'r `;- ii, . i;*. " schedules.Extensive utility coordination was performed. ,-,'-- , ... - —, „. lot:t.:,. ,�<:y M .... . ,..... —''' I....-.**...r... A ,,,,,, —Art, :2,, Coordination with Permitting/Environmental Agencies:As part of this r- --z-- _-,. �'' ' •7 project our firm obtained permits from Miami-Dade County DERM, - ,, .. .) --. i=- .., ,,- f it _' Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida 4 F. Health Department (DOH), and the City of Miami Beach Public Works • `• Department. , xsa. KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta,P.E.(Principal-in-Charge),Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.(Project Manager),Eithei Sierra,P•E.(Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling,Water Eduardo Martinez,P.E.(Electrical Engineering),Arnelio &Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hard- Alfonso,P•E.(Hydraulic Modeling),Lazaro Ferrero,P.E.(Water scape, Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pave- Pipeline),Nelson Perez,P.E.(Construction Administration, ment Markings,Construction Management,etc. Juan C.Velazquez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 5 f4 , ,* - ♦ .v ,..._misimil r - ' 41 ---54,4,1.;.tp:,-,,,Z,:1::-. - ' Projectrrw.w.ewvwra.rw.n.r,T �K `� ~ � ......miw�..ww.....„...,.�ug..� _--., ,e1 e �- . � . � _ A&P Consulting� _ ,.. PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR CRESPI BOULEVARD CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach,CIP Office t-- Bruce Mowry,P.E. ) c. y 0 Phone No.:(786) 759-8941 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z oz email:BruceMowry@miamib- COMPLETION DATE July 2015 V eachfl.gov PROJECT LOCATION Crespi Boulevard,City of Miami Beach,Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Removed 55 LF of existing seawall and constructed a new seawall and pump station,a part of the Crespi Boulevard Project. DMSI also installed rubble rip-rap at the point of the pump station discharge into the bay as required by the DRER and USACOE permit requirements.The new seawall was 15'in depth and it was raised in efforts to account for fu- ture sea level rises.The proposed seawall is intended to have a top elevation of 5.50 Ft.NAVD.The project consisted of the installation of a proposed collection system including 23 proposed inlets, 13 manholes,and 2,370 LF of drainage lines installed along Crespi Boulevard from Hawthorne Avenue to.84 Street.Proposed pump station and proposed 8-ft x 4-ft box culvert discharge connection with manatee grate was installed in-place of the existing 18"outfall located at the east side of Crespi Boulevard/81 Street intersections.Also responsible for the office administration construction progress activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement project.Some of the construction management services provided for this -7_ ..,?,. I 0-WMin - project included: Weekly construction .', ti` ��"� �' ffil sir meeting; Perform all shop drawing .,:. ',,.7.4:1,3^'::,.):,4 yyy __fi�r, y • • ` ter't •� > '4♦ .r r M m program functions, Respond to re- I III �. ,4. *I w ,., quest for information (RFPs); Evaluate r . - _,� iv" -__ ; , Request for Changes to project sched- % a' ti. itt :f.,...7",,,,,,,,;%4.m..400., „6: ules;Contract documents clarifications; u.. ',- *' : w - Inspect MOT operations; and Review, .r ::-'`. : --~ track and maintain construction sched- ..v.r j u.T ules. Extensive utility coordination was p _ lit, ��I performed. — '1 I 1 1 I . ''' 4 j:::..*"71k*'::''*-V.^:', ', .....;� ''..,rY+°. '14, .y •.w,. . „4.:: ,.I *''w *k PAd dnpylr..mram. 1r:: .. �'�' '♦ ,'y+.a...�.-S: -.1 y± .;; ,'43 ?'.Y.-'''' ,r'''x. \ ' 4 401101"›,.. ,'' ''''''.''''''''40...,"*.*' At**Pr' - . .. • ` +.•i •, � r,• ~�'^.�g,, 7-"-*., ' +•.- cte"l,x' �oaf:4. ; t,-, r ». : ro �,, 7. fi'''.--,,,'r4;'? « ,'r� zi Mo.an ,�``4yn - ��:r3�1., ,-;:;';Ary. rte $ , 1.**# ! � KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, RE. (Principal-in-Charge),Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.(Project Manager),Alex Yi,P.E.(Roadway Design),Eduardo Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling,Water Martinez,P.E.(Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfonso,P.E.(Hy- &Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hard- draulic Modeling),Lazaro Ferrero,P.E.(Water Pipeline),Nelson scape, Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pave- Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration) Juan C. Velazquez ment Markings,Construction Management,etc. (Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 6 140111Q1 , - N.'"ii -44.,ic.„,,,.. .i.s.,,,e.,,,4„: IT., . F "I"'--- • \-.....! .L �:' � Project Reference .0 . i i-. ' .. _ - - A&P Consulting ?7,-,-,so.:1/4,7,-..-.Y..:/::1Er.72 . PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR 11TH STREET ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach,CIP Office i-- Igor Vassiliev 0 0 Phone No.:(305) 546-5891 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services Z z o _ email:igorvassiliev@miamib- COMPLETION DATE August 2016 0 eachfl.gov PROJECT LOCATION 11th Street roadway reconstruction from Jefferson Avenue to Euclid Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Prepared construction documents (plans and specifications) for the following improvements: Develop new typical section and roadway reconstruction plans along 11th Street from west of Jefferson Avenue to east of Euclid Avenue, new 54-inch Force Main, new 30-inch sanitary gravity sewer, upgrade to existing pump station No. 1, new drainage system, water main upgrades, new decorative lighting system, replacement of existing span wire to mast arm sig- nalized intersections at Meridian Avenue and Euclid Avenue, landscape and irrigation upgrades,update signing and pavement markings. Also responsible for the office administration construction progress activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement project.Some of the construction management services provided for this project included: eekly construction meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; Respond to request for information(RFI's);Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules;Contract docu- ments clarifications;Inspect MOT operations;and Review,track and maintain construction schedules.Exten- sive utility coordination was perfomred.This project includes harmonization design treatments to properties due to grade differential between the .-, ,` ‘• ''"""'� :.4 ., , .. -4.�� proposed and existing grades. .4 x su , --- 1 s..- •.-4. : „-,-_-__ - ,. -,:tv. .,.--- ., ,-....„ .., .,. , .,„,,„ . ,..., ... _ .,_ :, ,....; - - **;"f INK , ' - 1. I /1 V�1 V\1 t�/'� with I��� P/'�V VN 1�•'��r'�/'V / Environ-�V��V 1 1 .e�C w`.. ..� z.. ''� _ .�'. � +�R ..�• 1"� . Cool dins ion vv ith cr muting ., -- ,► w� r L '_ -'_. �a .._-,i ., _--,'.,1.- mental Agencies: As part of this proj- ..-,..-,'=---)... .. . *a , ,,, '47:::::--„k,,,v.„0-.-,1,ciilet ect our firm obtained permits from M-D '.%.1 , z ji . s 1.-:--,;', . -iy - l':.. CountyDept.of Regulatory and Ecomon- _-"*4;,.'-: -- ,_ -z. .1.-4 * : 1 '' .: ''" is Resources (DRER), Florida Department 01 . °—"°-� .�� �'`' '',j.. .... ' -•-- . iii,, . of Environmental Protection FDEP Flor= .., — ” ss�,, y--1'" .--t • _-.,;�. ��'' ida Health Department DOH and the - ' . 11111 \`% ,.**2-(' -..,-,.. t-,7 City of Miami Beach Public Works Depart :A:. - -' *Itet ' ' ,,,,,.., 71, . ',.'4 ' ment. _ _ ., � �--,f-; 0- 1�� a44:-.{•/�1 : I1+wrrr ♦_ ..,:'��..��.�Ys .......,::. ,, 4 - - - % •.•A-'-7..--.P.,'._::`', / V A� *..i ✓ „. { 1 ' . .,,,,:. T � �-`!(� A.�.t ` �I �,:.*:;;‘:-:.'f: - . ' i•. l KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Merl, RoadwayDesign, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Nlodeiin , Water & P.E. (Project Mana er), Frank Lena, PE. (Roadway Design), gygg Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio g Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Markings, Construction Management, new 54-inch Force Pipeline),, Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration, g ' g p ) Main, new 30-inch Sanitary Gravity Sewer,etc. Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) Pi&P consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 7 gSNOW:.4,1- ''N. --.'i, '-,,,,,et,z.,;,;:i-f--... r. . - . , ''' ..44., .. ... i 4 . e. .-- " i #ij` ,-,,,L ,- ..: . ,.... , ... , .......-„,....7,. - ,,. . .., . • 4 \-_, .7,..-,v,...„.i...,--4i , 4.: Project —_ _ -. ' — .__._. - : gliiillal.,: Ar - ': X '.7'''....t:::.11:.;7'.:"'.; .1-:::- . •-::; tri M ,1• _.If 0't' ** i ' * ProjectReference A&P g , PROJECT NAME: MIAMI RIVER GREENWAY SW 1ST COURT TO SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE CLIENT NAME City of Miami CIP Office i...• d Orlando Misas APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z Z Phone No.:(305)416-1038 F.) — email:omisas@miamigov.com COMPLETION DATE December 2015 PROJECT LOCATION Downtown Miami from Biscayne Blvd.to Miami Ave and from SE 2nd St to NE 3rd St.,Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Engineer of Record/Project Manager for the design and preparation of Contract Plans and Specifications of the FDOT LAP's funded project for the extension of the Miami River Greenway from SW 1st Court to South Miami Avenue.Scope of Work was based on the City of Miami River Master Plan and included milling & resurfacing, decorative side-walk reconstruction,decorative lighting, new drainage,amenities,signing &pavement marking,and landscaping. Project also involved the preparation of the Technical Memorandum,utility coordination,preparing cost estimates,obtaining all permits including DERM,Miami-Dade County Public Works, FDOT, and coordination Miami Dade Transit to obtain a Maintenance Agreement for the con- struction of the new sidewalk under .- ' , .!''' 7 �r -.. , ., ` the existing M-Path and FPL to upgrade +,1 `:.::?4�..--,-„4/4, �, � a„f`��i "kyr `r *,;a the existing lighting system. Also re- , r, onside for the office administra- tr*Ift.44,...Ar...y...7,�sp tion construction progress activities ... ' ..... --- .•, --------- 401i I% • • ,,. % I.r f . 'rte f '_ 4} I related to the construction of this ,_ g - '. te right-of-way improvement project. �`. . ,, r. kt . -..-- : r„':. , f. * ` Some of the construction manage- ,.M _, ,,, '"r �� y went services provided for this prod• 4 - killkl_ �.� ''' ect included: Weekly construction , p ; --- a �„ II. ..r. . ,,,r' meeting; Perform all shop drawing r, -` •�; . , e program functions; Respond to re- a.,;: - • for information RFPs • Evalu '` - _ . - _ .= .r quest ( ), c - -- skf . ate Request for changes to project jf -' .:; - s ; i t schedules; Contract documents clar- .._ .., . ifications; Inspect MOT operations; .r .�y - - ;. and Review,track and maintain con- ' - struction schedules.Extensive utility - coordination was performed. --A, ,,,„„/„.„,f„.„, b.r .�.,,w...„. 1 ';;:7"..-4,,*„.' ;. , ,.w ,fe .,:, KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Sierra, P<E. (Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfon- Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, so, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water and Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Sewer Pipeline), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administra- Markings, Construction Management,etc. tion, Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 9 +�• ..'ems ' ii %;asx."--A, till ,-. - ���. Reference -4Pro est - _ '" _ AWN - ;` � A&P Consulting'...' d* ,yr• in ' . PROJECT NAME: PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL (POMT) CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation D-6 Jaquie Sequeira, P.E. Q o Phone No.:(305) 640-7433 APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering &Inspection z z Fax No.: (305)640-7430 o — email:jaquie.Sequeira@dot. COMPLETION DATE June 2014 state.fl.us PROJECT LOCATION Port of Miami Tunnel (POMT) from Watson Island to Dodge Island,Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tunnel under Government Cut, Roadway work on .-.._'- ......, .: --- ..,_,. -..,._ -.,7 7-7-- Dodge and Watson Islands,MacArthur Causeway Bridge widening, and a 43 foot diameter tunnel boring ma- chine specifically constructed for the project.The Port of .�_ Miami Tunnel (POMT) project is an integral component , __ P a#11,"4#6- ; _: .: of a larger program incorporating operational improve- A- A /:- vments to SR-836/Dolphin Expressway(from the existing '1 :"""--------toll station) to the 1-95 and 1-395 Interchange. Multiple �4 {r'.4 ��., options for increasing port access were explored. Only - i ; i 1 z`0 - :. '; 0 _ .e- Island tunnel met all requirements of local, 1 .`" i .,� ` .,. '�� • the Watson q � standards.The Project included a tun- —,� �- ' _ . `a". a state and federal ti,_ �' - „ nel under Government Cut, Roadway work on Dodge 1 t-- ` n P .--- _-- .- -- and Watson Islands, MacArthur CausewayBridge wid- ` _ ; ,- i ening, and a 43 foot diameter tunnel boringmachinetke ',. y '' �.: .,>�:,�' - 4, s _ -��• 9 .� • specifically constructed for the project was used.APCTE E .,,,,.„ , �� 1 ,:. ` .F.•, • ti has provided the following professional services as part ' . ii:.# -a . r . . .,. „,,,. .,,,,,,k, .. , of the PB Americas Team: Project Manager for technical . �•: . N, � ��Y�" advisoryand plans review, and Construction Engineer- , '-i - - _ ing & Inspection (CEI) Services. We performed the fol- r--- 1 lowing tasks:Responsible for dailyinspections of the �f_l par/'- Roadway including earthwork, milling, asphalt and , i ,^�r utilities such as FP&L,sewer and water,etc.;concrete ti plant for the inspection of the concrete segments for P the Tunnnel, inspection of the MacArthur Causeway _ .... bridge widening including foundation(drilled shafts , .` 42"dia.),footings,columns,caps,etc. KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Arnelio Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Resources), Mauricio Castillo, P.E. (Roadway Inspector) Technical Advisory, Plans Review for Compliance, and Eduardo Fleites (Roadway Inspector), Rene Machado(Senior Construction Engineering and Inspection Services Roadway Inspector) j A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,corp. 10 !ts 41 i AIN, .-. 4 i ' �;,- 1Project Reference *1i . , � .`` • - - __��J���._. . "z �--' _ ` - ' .... -1, _. A&P .µ: Consulting4�' .7� "�-, °: • "��: �- .w{ n ....'t om -.` r R , : PROJECT NAME: N.W.25TH STREET VIADUCT PROJECT CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation D-6 Claudio Diaferia, P.E. Q o Phone No.:(305)499-2392 APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering &Inspection z z Fax No.: (305)499-2351 o — email:claudio.diaferia@dot. COMPLETION DATE August 2016 state.fl.us PROJECT LOCATION N.W.25th Street from the Palmetto Expressway(SR 826)to NW 89th Court,Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves two major parts: the roadway re- • .1 , ' rr.'1.:7,10:,,,,,71,::::.,,,, `construction and widening of NW 25 Street from the .KPalmetto Expressway (SR 826) to NW 89 Court and the ''''k :'M - � " #:....... construction of a viaduct. The viaduct, elevated about .�. --'- -- -- - ' -�30 feet, is situated mainly along the north side of NW y ....:1;1, .r`7� � 25 Street and will connect with the existing east viaduct ..,. _ __.. � ' !"' over the Palmetto Expressway and touch down just east \. ' -y f ,j.-y 4 of NW 82 Avenue.Construction Engineering&Inspec- ,t,,, :" ,, ,:.,ti tion (CEI) Services. APCTE performed the following ,` y y`i ' tasks:Responsible for daily inspections of the Bridge! ", �s , _,* w earthwork, milling, asphalt and `."a, Roadway including p w asFP&L sewer and water, concrete -- . utilitiesI; such etc.; plant for the inspection of the concrete segments,in- M , __ k , . '.� '.•."•' ,.. ..rte spection of the bridge including foundation (drilled shafts),footings,columns,caps,etc. a ,3r 'z.,' µ-...."M -, ��:.: • __ - ,,,„,...e*,,,,--..,- _.74....... ...,..- - . , .h.,,, ,,..,,,,,09.7... _- ,-4,1„...,,-. .,-- ,,, , ,..„.....,„„it, ...f, ', - = ' c,*,.... ,, i r i.,. s :. tf .ice Mt° :t 2 b, 4etti.A*2444.•. ,R"`rk 1k • meq, 1' E ;, 4044 .«�-.- ",vim. X : ' `,Y „+.� .!:.1.---,.*.'*---* ,. .....'''-'-31:'..lrit' ':- ' ''''*..: -,'"ItIt;,7r4. .,,,. ' 'iit4tilit'l'Y''''',',!,:lt)7; 'T.',.,..' ' .., _ -,, , l'--,., ' zi_.,. ,• . _ iik 1 KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Nelson V. Perez, P.E. (Sr. Project Engineer),John Williams(Project Administra- dor Bridge), Juan Medina, P.E. (Project Administrador Road- Construction Management and Construction Inspec- way), Jorge Manso, P.E. (Senior Bridge Inspector), Ramon tion Services Liana, E.I. (Contract Support Specialist),Jason Perez(Senior Roadway Inspector),Alex Milz(Senior Roadway Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 11 _,.. , \ - ,.,:"" ,Vi. , 4,- ,:. A . 1" • ,• 'i _, , t, -ii- --F, * x, . ''. :,°"F., „ . t-,� Project---0 „, Reference i . ..... _ � �.. _ _ : A&P Consulting �.., '', .�D �Er7. t PROJECT NAME: NW 109 AVENUE NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CLIENT NAME City of Doral i— Jorge Gomez, P.E. Q 0 Phone No.:(305)593-6740 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services '- z z _ email:jorge.gomez@cityofdoral. COMPLETION DATE August 2016 corn PROJECT LOCATION NW 109 Avenue from NW 41 Street to NW SO Street, Doral, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Engineer of Record / Project Manager for the design and .,:4/:::,' , -; ' 4r', "icy` 4(,.✓ . , f r at':. ,., CEI Inspection and Construction Management of this ~, `' .,,;.-,4'r.:_ ali,:L_,t :tit:'*, project to design a new roadway.The new NW 109th Av- ''.;::iia' :.**.g. �:�w ,'jt'�,... enue connection gives almost 900 households and sever- - ft-,. •'' al businesses an alternative to heavily used avenues, NW - "-°`- -t... .,- - ,;;:‘,441 ",., 107th and NW 112th.This roadway improvement project, - -,"3 ,. ,{,,. �j;,- ,fi, ;i° .. -.. � ••fir%"� ��•it��~ completed ahead of schedule and under budget,will im- ,,,.. -; _. prove circulation and offer the community an alternative ,- .A ` -_: :l:.,-- .- . `-' - to driving. - - - :. .�` �- - '' ,� - APCTE provided CEI services during construction of .,�,R -. , =' ;. ..__ " . = �. a . • , ,, this project. Some of the construction management ,f _..... .,.-11,: - .-• �1 T . _ r _�� - SST''+ services provided for this project included: Weekly - • liil � ' _ . -,--- : �',, construction meeting/coordination to monitor; Per- .. rte- ---- - R•.-..,_... - . form all shop drawing program functions; Respond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules;Contract documents -.... \ clarifications;Inspect all MOT operations;and Review, _ ` track and maintain construction schedules. , d i KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta,P.E.(Principal-in-Charge),Eithel Sierra,P.E. (Project Manager),Alejandro Leon,P.E.(Project Engineer), Eduardo Martinez,P.E.(Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfon- Roadway Design,Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling,Permit- so, Utility Coordination, Lighting,Signalization,Signing and Pavement Markings,Construction Management,etc. so,P.E.(Hydraulic auric rvrodelir rg),Nelson i Pe ez,P.C.(Construction Administration,Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector),Jorge Abela (Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 12 4 '"r"t '-»pry#" t . Reference Pro est • -� , _ - - _ - — , A&P Consulting= , ,'r:, E , ra!3 1 i,.' PROJECT NAME: 1-75 EXPRESS LANES SEGMENT C CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation D-4 Antonio Castro, P.E. Q o Phone No.: (954)448-2905 APCTE ROLE CEI Services z z o email:antonio.castro@dot. COMPLETION DATE On-Going ° state.fl.us PROJECT LOCATION SR-93/1-75 ML System South of Miramar Parkway to South of Sheridan Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION -..,,,-.,„.,, ,. . , ,,-„ - - - -'.'7,7"---- - This Design-Build project calls for the implementation of ` Express Lanes alongSR-93 / 1-75.This is one of five ro'- ", y.";t4,,), ;� ' �� ects within this District Four corridor that runs from NW ". ` .,, " �` F` a,� ' 5w ti� o q. 170th Street in Miami-Dade County to 1-595 in Broward „zx air a,, County.The project calls for constructingwithin the exist- :,:r41.-tilpt,ifit.;.,0,*::-,,,,g,,,,,;,,, 4* °" "in 166-foot wide median a 4-lane divided tolled roadway ��( ,y,„,. "!y,`": � ,�;''`'..,�' �,' ��� � N � ��t�t4 q� i g 111.. W; �° �' �ay��r�wT��. \hn�i1.�y'L " r a a°R���X 99�,1rtk�?"{'e'' 1 ropr (two 12-foot travel lanes in each direction) with 6-foot ,,.',';,.,::NI, ,' Nl paved inside shoulders and 12-foot (10 feet paved) out- 't°.;';;„14,4., ' side shoulders.The project also includes constructing the ‘ ,,vi " "n,.'ill ,,,,,..044%'it Pembroke Road Overpass Bridge within the limited ac- I .s`,+, l ' 0 cess right-of-way and Broward Countywill construct the - ,0,.:.,,,,,,,„,;:::; 4, `�; ,, . ,,,` y . , _ approaches. The Miramar Parkway Overpass Bridge and r 4i;de, `m - interchange will be reconstructed. " - , APCTE provided CEI services during construction of NA, , --- .. , --.,•.. r this project. Some of the construction management " ' services provided for this project included: Weekly ; . ., PA:._= construction meeting/coordination to monitor; Per- " : form all shop drawing program functions; Respond ' P to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request '�.. for changes to project schedules;Contract documents ,, clarifications;Inspect all MOT operations;and Review, AaMi- "�'.' r*�;„ track and maintain construction schedules. ,$' �4 : . ,t),:::,,,, M KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES' Antonio Acosta,P.E.(Principal-in-Charge),Nelson Perez,P.E. (Construction Administration),Mauricio Castillo,P.E.(Project Construction Engineering and Inspection Services, Con- Administrator),Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector),Jorge- P Manzo(Senior Bridge Inspector);Jason Perez(Senior Inspec- tor); struction Management,etc. Hemberth Salazar,P.E.(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 13 -a Il II II .4-...... ,,,,L..,,,,,.;,:,....... ... ,..... . .., . ..,:..p.,...___, • , ..._1.2. . . .. .. ..,„... ,..,le an rilli ..r..1111, I All 1.1 - ,...isiri. .5311,1173-1 lain . _ ... _ ,.. . ... r • „, •4.1 , ,,,,.... - ''' VW". , N '"' . ' t.;:31 I 1 1,1001 .... itAlla ' ',VT - ,....4.• `,•-•••:',.......,,,,„.*- ,.. ' g .,.z.., „..•,....),,,-. ..*,,,-,ih,:•-.4,47.::•,.....-. „ ,1 ,. c .4., ...t..,.:,-",f.•2:7..,-!";:tp.i:tii•so.'-:ft.',' '.', ';''''i,..-.41-'-,,-,;..'„ ' ,,,• , t,,,t7* • . -11,- ._ .i, • 17 L 4....,...43,,,..:..--. .•. /1...I';';'9'.-"A''-',„Ilt 14•••4'•••.41.,...'..1•9--•••• '',..•I'•:A. 4,...*,......••....... 4, • lo, 11.5.1. .. ,,.- y. - ' ,,,i",,i4,, -. =. •i it._• _- ".... / 1 IF — ' i. . ,,,c,..., ,,,,,..1--. 4,,,,,,,,,,1,, --.. ---••••••• ‘40,0;.••...-. . ' -- -''-' ' •'' 4.1;.?-:‘1,1':"...' . ' l',..w -, -\" 1 ...•-:,4,-...• . t',!...0,,1/4,.., ' ... . ... ..•.-4 ,- - •- - - ***,'- - "4,..' .-4.,---,N.". ‘`'rk4. . - ..'.. -4", ,,,A, .-44---. ..-, -.....",' ...v.. -. .--..4... ''?"•.*' ' - - -.- ...s )1.-.2-7. . -TrA,...*..-••..4. ..,- ir"..7 • -. -:;.,....4, -. P-- , . •,-,-Ava ,okt.,...5. ...: , .. , ' 7•L' .ii." '...:.'....,...4,' ' -../ •" ., r ii ' / ‘,.. 1" ..A.,.:74-r-.,..41;•t..%*icY;.„, 7.v.'''.;',,,,,,J.-N*,..tirie,..,it....,,,*-- ,,,,.*--.4. ..., i,-y• ,t,...,,,,7.:,. ,.,..,,,,, :13p54....i. --.,,,, -.44-.1... i't • Q . ',,,. 5.1 ,,..,.-3 t .•1,. • ..4.,..,•• ..., 0, .. • ' 'e ' .4 .•.„ ....:,. ": ' .....111::::•:007.IV."`,,r17,A, ,,• A.. .41'. .. .., - .. • ' ,44. ..„...!. 4..*, , -• ""•-.,'4. .V V•' irk...re-iff 11. ci, ' ... :...• '• •2. *• ' ra' .= A a ILI- . --*".• ...y- , , ..,1..vii IP-"'"'17%-::.,-...44,* •.. . '..'''''',. •-• —c ...-. '1,.."r: :•...., % , . •-,.... . , .„. if• .42*.v. • , -.. s' •=, Is. i., ,r. ... . . ..4i.j. ; •, . -,. ,i-,.:,-,...--,-.,..,%-•,„-- ..,•-.... .•,-,...:,,..-.:. ••:....iitt-. •• AP• . i• ' • .. ' ' , ...., ,- 'I ".*-{. s-• " . .• ,, - r ..,..' .'"'". .- .'''• '''‘••'4;' :ig-•.:.,"ri.-. -as r '' ' ' • in, - : . t. • *r 4' - ; '''''' •11-4,,,L. .: ••:,'•'--P.."'""'Vac:4'.1 i'.;-: -....-: •- '-,* ..),...:i.,..... ,,•.,..;- .„. ,,,..t........;• ..,•...s.'., ; .4 f . • .. *1., ..'„.'er,. a., • '.. • -• • - ...._...'." 7 IV ,, • ' ./ •'" ik-, k • I ' -....* - • . .•••.:. . -. ' , ,,.,-.,......_..... _.0 , .•....i.._ , ..;, ., - 4.--.. ...„.., •.t-,zr.la-.*V. I..l ",. -., • . • -4. r— - , - - .7.....,• •, imik."--, , ....,-• .. : . .! • .- 4.. -..... -• '--4Vv...--' ... t • . e .r%.:-..r. ...,, L.... -.......___• , •... . ,.., slit • t • 1 . •. .4 _ e . .._,........ _Lisiowit.- ,,,-...:4.,.......„.„ 4. --•- — Ya• N.w.,%-• t. • ..,..... .., :. • • , .... .,.. - . ----',IL'Mt- ' ........ ........ . ,....,..- ._, _..._........__ 1 .,.. ,. - - • `-• ,-- -- .. -- -----44- •:,..... IP . . .. . 4 , • I • -' . 1 . '' assiReft... .. 1.6.41E.ilb-.4111."". .:- , •,..11.4.4.4 ,7... ' .., ''''.._• .., ' • , • ... It. . ,'e .3 O' 'L.'••• , 0 • • - • •••''' .. . i' '''.•-- It-- "Ilik': . •••,.._ ,„„,.-'...,.•••,--•-,. , ...•‘ ‘t iir —.• - ', -.• .,...:'._.s. '.'•,•t ;.....- - . .... -. • .. •--- '',. ., . •• ...... • - . • #.-.. A :... .. /4*. - 'all a. .1. • ^.4„.. ,-...., ii,• ...-.N.,. -7,5,s .. ........ ',:.1 Vil..•i , 4., i. ..• .fl. ',110;.... J16.-..1C,-*- ,r 't-st--..r j '-',./..-'•-• "gr7 s. .../ * ,`• .44.1* a : , ,0" -44"rrri4r ,--'v - __... -.- ..._ ... •• ..,.--,,,-./ ,,,,,. • i . : , - .....___ - . - . .....„..,:- - .7-,;.-- . ...dr'' yr; *..4. "Illr 4-'•4.''':,-. AC -... ,.3 , ,, - . . ,.. w... .-.., ft., . - ‘-.',..1 .- -- - Ig ,.. ,...- , ' , . , IS•' .•ai • .011. f..., ...,. . .. , .. ...... <a,... , . ......, . ,, ..,, .*, 't‘,........**.N.1,,‘ '1'4 ge,liPP . '. ' .7. .....,.*;10.,•',..i:..••,A.,:,1.........:'''' ,7"......:2,1,,,, ,::,.............7...,.' '................,.. -....._ '',.. ,.... ,..• ... • ...,...t .7.,...... , ...... r...-- ........1P....itvii . . ---,:,--, - ..... ......- .1-- •. _ , 0 *,,..... As.'"Ff ' • it f- -.." ,. ,.,191,,, , 11Ir ... .. . ..,- ...4,.......„.„.. . . ...,..... - - ""` • - . •... . ..,.. ,L...,mi.Oft -"ir ....1.. ."..... `' • • ' 4,) .- i P.,,,...*:, '7,''.•4.. ''.'40,- '7.... .- -- : :: ,.. . . I''.• • , . . - • .... _.-41 ,, . .'....-::,,. -- --i‘'''. _ •-.0.. ''. '- ' -...4 . '- , ''',--A,^1,411t - - • .:.14570-.....-',.•.• '''''"I•.,....,.'t.-... - .... .....- -or .. .....• ., .' " • A.--,..,---75L- •'.. - %-..,.%., • ‘,.. . ,.. .. . . , ,__ ., • .... At .... - .. ... . . •I:. - - 7: ........,tsr ,s.•- • _or- •-. 1 ,...- •"' . '.: ..4i",....••-'-;1‘.. ' 1:1111.1.1,..sr IV." '. - ,,. . . '.'- . 4-'••• . s...,. /I:4.*.s.:. ...:*„:. ''' .7'..tir-........•'t - • t. , .. - 1.1.'..... 7. _ 4..., ... ..4.'...4 :.-.‘.."*•'••-it.- • ....1••:::•.' ...7 • .... — ". . . A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. 14‘ RI . h _MOW.rt ii —i,.. 4 i , -'.--4 Certifications •_,..: , . '—_ . i,.....-. - - ........,__,.........___ _'- ' ..�._ A&P Consulting -,,,,::::)-:('..-7n4),-.1ng¢rCct Corp, APCTE FLORIDA REGISTRATION Provide evidence of Professional Registration Pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). State of Fl Department o I certify from the records of this office that A& P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on January 17, 1995. The document number of this corporation is P95000003950. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2016,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 5,2016,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Fifth day of January,2016 1r :i.:TI --1 .**1=t\- li ~ ki mit *. .— t. - --1- Z. _____L)44N____ • _- ,.... Secretary of State --000-ii, -.- Tracking Number:CC6383523207 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertiticateOfstatus/CertiticateAuthentication A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 15 . IIgr. Certifications -,r —rine aim - -._.... ' _ ,_._ - A&P Consulting FD0'71-4"� Florida Department of Transportation 4)5 Suwannee Street 013134[) Tallahassee.FL 32399,45 VECILL'�t5 June 28,2016 Antonio Acosta,President A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. 10305 NW 41'Street,Suite 115 Doral,Florida 33178 Dear Mr.Acosta: The Florida Department of Transportation has reviewed your application for qualification package and determined that the data submitted is adequate to technically qualify your firm for the following types of work: Group 3 -Highway Design-Roadway 3.1 -Minor Highway Design 3.2 -Major Highway Design 3.3 -Controlled Access Highway Design Group 4 -Highway Design-Bridges 4.1.1 -Miscellaneous Structures 4.1.2 -Minor Bridge Design 4.2.2 -Major Bridge Design-Steel Group 5 -Bridge Inspection Group 10 -Construction Engineering Inspection 5.4 -Bridge Load Rating 10.1 -Roadway Construction Engineering Inspection 10.3 -Construction Materials Inspection Group 6 -Traffic Engineering and Operations Studies 10.4 -Minor Bridge&Miscellaneous Structures CEI • 6.1 -Traffic Engineering Studies Group 13 -Planning 6.2 -Traffic Signal Timing 6.3.1 -Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis and Desigi 13.4 -Systems Planning 6.3.2 -Intelligent Transportation Systems Implementation 13.5 -Subarea/Corridor Planning 6.3.3 -Intelligent Transportation Traffic Engineering Systems 13.6 -Land Planning/Engineering 13.7 -Transportation Statistics Group 7 -Traffic Operations Design Your overhead audit has been accepted,enabling your firm to compete for Professional 7.1 -Signing,Pavement Marking and Channelization Services projects advertised at the unlimited level,with estimated fees of any dollar amount. 7.2 -Lighting This status shall be valid until June 30.2017 for contracting purposes. 7.3 -Signalization Facilities Home/Branch Field Capital Cost Overtime Office Office of Money Premium Direct Expense WWW.dut.state.il-us Overhead Rate 169.29% 138.11% 0.028% Reimbursed 6.24%(Homey 19.42%(Feld)` `Rent and utilities excluded from field office rate.These costs will be directly reimbursed on contracts that require the consultant to provide field office. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email at cartiayn.kell@dot-state.fl.us or by phone at 850-414-4597. Sincerely, /Jr' 71' Carliayn Kell Professional Services Qualification Administrator ww1y.dot.stat t,t1.us A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 16 Inarbii., ' . ig ____ Certifications -. ..,,,,,.-k- ..._ _ . A&P Consulting w * State ' i a ri a - Board of PreAssional Enineers Attests that AC:).4‘ , R * * ''r''* . - A & P Consultino. Transpoiln . 1-igineers rivB PE ,,, ... -_,,, , ,. , , --„,..._....... ?...3,...,0411 it ...., , . •:. ---,‘„ii I - L ,.- T. - ...- .*- -,,i,14 i '''-•".-S-. Is authorized under the provisions of Sec#on 4'71.023:F1(311.i Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida-Statutes. Expiration: 2/28/2019 ,,. ... , CA Lic.No: Audit No: 228201901487 R 7797 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Antonio G. Acosta , P.E. A - 1) r 1 ' r ...) Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 -,°,: c,. -7.4::(1--;.,--..e,„a4k,,: f P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201910931 R '''''',,,,1!-1-4, WiI• 1.:-7, -ir- 40845 ,State f Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Carlos M. Gil-Mera , P.E. .., Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes 0.,:- RE.laic.No Expiration: 2/28/2019. '";,,i P- - - et .,...„ fr Audit No: 228201911027 R * ,-. :: -i A r. ,,3 43953 -"r:1 ',:-",I ............... ......... A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 17 . A — A•VI ;f.,'.:---:, i::—._ 7._gfr ' , • 'a ittp,—7:". r : id ,' ..,:'7„,,,,A-,,,...2: Certifications t .....,„.„.,,,:. . 1,-• .Allp'' 44 lk.- .• ' ~ - ------------,.......,... . ,,. . MP Consulting — - , - --..- - . -..., •I_ - ' . _ . ---_ —4-:: ,, .•-.i. .----. -----_. State of....: Florida Board of Professional Engineers t ,Attests that Eithel M.'Sierra , P.E. . -..,i,04011,111114120‘q - ,- -. ..4,,..it 41/4-‘1 is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 . RE.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201900560 R 55401 State f Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that . Arnelio Alfonso P E , „ . 4 A ...,, . . ,. is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/20191 RE.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201919651 R ,•4::: —.4::', —r7,' , ., , lilt..... ,,,...-.- 52566 . . • State f Fl , • d Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Nelson V. PerezP E , . IA . Lb 11E_ is licensed as a Professional EngineerI linder Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE.Lk.No: Audit No: 228201907488 R 4-- ,),tz, ,,,,I,v9. A . '--. 4, vi;7„.., ' 1.,,. 32025 '..:.-,.-,-,--77•-*!;,..'''''' ' ............. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 18 sew , i N , • ,4: ' latii .7 :1 11 ,,,`-'' ...4.;:z,,,,. IT i Certifications 7- ... , .., ,,..,v,:t, WI • ".fait L - ..Amp k- - _ — - — — 4 _ A&P Consulting -11:c,:-./.7 .cr3E,nrjir -- , - --- _..em -- - 1.."-- — ' ' "?....24.41,e_z.-lia, P ' .•*' ' — —--; State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that . , ....i Erik Sibila , P.E. .7..!J iFBPE . .4. v Is licensed as a Professional Engineer um*Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 4PrRE.Lic.No: Audit No: 113201917913 R4., 74663 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Juan Medina Alfonso , P.E. 41.0010-- '''Qc 1 iilik F-fliP- ,4;4&,, Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 ''''','f - i, --I ':V4-.-,ik P.E.Lic.Na: Audit No: 228201901597 R t›.!;*01)-ifi -t3,...4- 73236 ''''''''-t ''' i State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers et Attests that 1 Dans U. Rovira , P.E. IBE ' ' I , Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201916709 R 54724 MP Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 19 Certifications -_ - --: - ' ..--.. ' '----" 2 . V 1.- A&P Consulting State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Alexander Sipeng Yi , P.E. ILtaptk- ! 6 i 'f -Is licensed licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 P.E.Lk.No: Audit No: 228201916913 R 58820 state of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Eduardo Luis Martinez , P.E. , . \ - - :. 40 BPE , . Aar' to* , , ,,,,,,:.,, ,,.,,,J , Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201903275 R 52023 ,:i.:1-ic State f Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Alex F. Guon , P.E. F[31)F-__ Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201903293 R , '..f), wt. 53247 , *'-'-*---,:z.a•-:--,..:-.:------ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 20 ;It Certifications -. 4,... -- " - ..2.....H,..,- , . „h., . ., ,.... „,,.. :: A&P Consulting .- -----'-,, — — .2,—... -- -:-* ----, '-', . 7-- --7--)1• . , State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Hiram Hernandez , P.E. \ , „ Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201922719 R 41935 1 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers - Attests that Osinany Alfonso , P.E. :. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 Audit Na: 22820190671 R *.4:0-e-4.0-JA":''a "..,1 '2,-; -;D 4iVli, 1 fr. RE.Lic.No: 61601 State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Ivonne Planas , P.E. A t : II P 1 ) - i!Ts.-:iy Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE.Lie.Na Audit No: 228201920711 R 67358 A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 21 :,.f2.-.'„E.,-,-.,,,:,,,,,,,,,, gyp .r w , Y e{K , .,.. , ,. . ,, ..,,..,, ,v „– ,.. :_....,...,- ,„:• ,. ., ,-, .. ,, , , ' '''''. ' '- ---..-2,-_,:,,,,--. ....., v , ,,,,:„.,,,,,_..:,., , , , , , .. , , , .,...,..-.:,...,. .,,,.. , ,. , .. .„'„,- .:,.,.,v,--2 :, : }'e } Z > ',. ',_, : ,,,, . - > } ,,,, ,, ,, ' ,.„ . , ...,... •. tippat.:.l,.a�' s.,...Sp,.....»,. r,.P".. ,,«.:�^:,.'4P' » ...,.. ..., ...... - , ,.. �,,¢y,ttfr'..?t .. a �P,.'�! <..g .'4.,n .e.. ,i a��o .. p��..eA........... d3 ..... , ,.. y ... : . . hre.. .�.,- bx. ... .. ., '.._t.. ,. n -ir'. `.• a .a..... .. .... y� At>.w ..;. A,.,.. .'9.: 1........ , � ..: :.: ,. a r.....:.. 5.. .._A- ,. .A.' .. 5. >4' ... ,,. P.. „_.......:.y,..e.'L-i...n n'...-i. Y•, b. u.r.. ...a S d +3�+". ..n ..... _,>. a>...,.. .,.. ...+�,..a�. ., , 3. ., a* .... ....,. ,. ..p..., �„.. :e..-F� t ..� ,:. .. ,......w. ,.. , . .,,•.,. :<,_ ."fie,>>R r..P..-..-d .. .. �'. .., ! e ..�, . ...�' -< .,.x,... +�-ate . .t.. .. ..... .,�' a..w,. . , . a...., <. ,. ,. '' ..r an 3+1„ h. x.:rc.. "'�. .. ,. ,.. .. < ... .f ...p.. .. ... .... ,. , ;,-,,,-,0.,,,,,,k ,y�.>.,r. .. 9r.... .). ..:'%......t „.. ! ....a m.$...�a �'ba r a.:.n , r a. s* ,N?;.p',...,4.'fe....7�,.,..»S.s ..:.. .. .,a�>,�,.kms... .<. .. ., .:_ ....:...,.. •.....�,. :_ ,. ' - ' . ' '' - . ,:::.. . :— .. ,, v,, _ . - ' io . - - V.” ,..,.: s, , , .. ' t \ r,„ z \ ,s , , .. .., :.. , , ,, , , .. , ,,. , • CO . • di , ':,-....-,.• ,,,, . , ,, . , ,.. 0 1 ,,=. ,,,,„ . „, -..-7-4 , ..,,___,.•. ...z.,,-.•,-,:„,,,,,,,•,. 4 . .., ... ,,. ,• ,.• . • k `„ ir i. P - it $ U 1 ' '''I T if 1 : - :.•''''\.:, ' t '11111 IL,14 I 11111 -1 ntil ' _ ____ ���• , h `� --- ?.I I' t:— • A . , , ,........ 11 t:, , . ..,,,,:,---,----,-3:,-,...it-'fte.:-. - — ..,,,. __.... ....k.,:::i.:-. . ti1/4..o. M ♦'..tom '� - — .. _ Experience and Qualifications ,, ... --„,,,,,.. :, :, ..,‘ le, - r . , - 1 . i , r. -- = Experience & Qua ...01 ..r.it :__ .Amp 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of pro- viding the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required:project description,agency name,agency contact,contact telephone&email,and year(s) and term of engagement. A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,CORP.(APCTE) is a Multi-Dis- _ ciplinary Miami-Dade County Headquartered Engineering Company that was estab- lished in 1997. APCTE has more than 95 iocai employees (30 Registered PE's and 61 a? f ' Graduate Engineers) dedicated exclusively to transportation/infrastructure projects. >. . e. - R.. APCTE will serve as the prime CEI Firm for this contract,and has been recently involved in the design of several D/B projects for the City of Miami Beach such as Washington y Avenue, Nautilus Neighborhood, Lummus Neighborhood, Biscayne Point Neighbor- hood S.E. Flamingo Neighborhood, Prairie Avenue, amongst others. APCTE has also /IP.. ' !.,' worked on multiple FDOT construction management/CEI Projects like the NW 25th ' k':` Street Viaduct East and West Sections, this project was an elevated bridge/viaduct ` connecting the wharehouse district of the City of Doral with the Cargo area of Miami •� . International Airport We are also working for FDOT District Four as the Prime CEI Firm ., for the SR-93/1-75 ML Express System Lanes Segment C form South of Miramar Park- a Y9 way to South of Sheridan Street. On this project,four new managed lanes are beign =- . constructued on the median of 1-75 to alleviate the existing congestion. APCTE prides itself in serving a wide variety of clients and attending their individual needs. Our firm is unparalleled in client satisfaction providing our clients with focused and innovative solutions that yield cost effective results.Since it's establishment APCTE has completed a myriad of projects ranging in scale and complexity.The broad spectrum of award-winning projects in our portfolio provides the diverse foundation necessary to triumph over any challenge that may arise. It is this diversity, innately found in our firm,which enables APCTE to guarantee effective project execution for large-scale goverment projects while simultaneously delivering to our private and government clients the delicacy that is indispensable to their particular needs. As part of our prevailing paradigm we infuse a culture of community in all of our firm's endeavors. Perhaps because of our humble beginnings,APCTE places a grave importance on public involvement and believes that a collaborative effort is key to the success of any project. Holding true to our sense of duty, APCTE actively maintains and nurtures relationships, not only with our clients, but also with the surrounding public. APCTE enthusiastically engages in many communal events and sponsors causes that are deeply en-twined with the hearts of the local residents.Due to this intrinsic belief that approval from the public is the ultimate factor de- termining the success of any project,APCTE places a strong importance in the end-user and shall always ensure their satisfaction.APCTE main philosophy is to provide our clients with a product that far exceeds the technical and abstract requirements imposed by each project.Over the years,we have established an excellent working relationship with all of our clients,which among many others includes the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT),Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (M-D WASD), Miami-Dade County Public Works Department,City of Miami,City of Miami Beach,City of Doral,City of Hialeah,Town of Miami Lakes,Village of Palmetto Bay, and Village of Biscayne Park. Our primary objective is to guarantee that the client's best interests are served. APCTE's SIMILAR EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Please find attached on the following page Table 2.1 which shows APCTE's list of similar experience and qualifications A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 1 .,,...„ ,,,„...... , , +xJ'.,:1,7:--:-....;;..�,Y' IR ,, \ _ !:J - • '� " M.x wat" ,,-,,;,„„ --,....,:.v... ..,.,,,m1 , ,,,, ., : ._. . - L—-� Experience & Qua as requested in RFQ Section 3,Tab 4. TABLE 2.1 -APCTE'S LIST OF SIMILAR EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Pro' Type of Pro' yy��` ro ect _ _ `"CIEs R• Washington Ave. Right-of-way g Lead Designer I CEI City of Miami Beach Improvements I 100% August 2006 Phase II, IV, &V Design I Build Design-Build Prairie Ave. Roadway Cityof Miami Beach Reconst. and Stormwa- Design-Build 100% August 2006 Lead Designer I CEI g g Design I Build ter Pump Station Right-of-way Lead Designer/CEI City of Miami Beach Lummus Neighborhood Improvements/ 100% August 2008 Design I Build Design-Build Nautilus Neighborhood Right-of-way g Lead Designer/CEI City of Miami Beach Improvements/ 100% February 2010 No.7 Design-Build Design I Build g Cit of Miami Beach 30"FM Replacement Design-Build 100% �, Lead Designer I CEI City alongHardingAve. g June 201 Design Build 9I W.M.,and Streetscape Improvements alongRight-of-way Lead Designer I CEI City of Miami Beach p Improvements/ 100% April 2013 Byron &Dickens Ave- Desi n-Build Design I Build nue(ARRA Project) g Right-of-way of Miami Beach Biscayne Point Neigh- Lead Designer/CEI Improvements/ 100% October 2013 ( ) borhood No. 1 Design-Build Design I Build 11th St roadway Cityof Miami Beach reconstruction,Water& Lead Designer I CEI Sewer improvements, Design-Build 35% February 2017 ( ) to sewer Design I Build upgrade Pump Station#1 City of Miami Beach Crespi Blvd.WM, ° Lead Designer/CEI * Drainage and Stormwa- Design-Build 100% October 2015 ( ) ter Pump Station Design I Build Florida Department of Transportation NW 25th Street Viaduct Design-Bid-Build 100% March 2016 Lead CEI (FDOT) NW 109 Avenue New Lead Designer/CEI City of Doral Construction Design-Bid-Build 100% October 2011 Designl Build Cit of Doral NW 97 Avenue New Desi n-Bid-Build 100% Februa 2016 Lead Designer/CEI y Construction g Design I Build Florida Department 1-75 Managed Lanes Lead CEI g of Transportation Design-Build 90% August 2017 FDOT New Construction Design Build (*)APCTE was the Lead Designer and also provided CEI Services for these DIB Projects A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 2 Mai, 'a., ly_ '.;7.,::.•',:- . . .,. P. �..: Cemfications _oi , ,_ , ., 7,, , .7 . ....riamL . ........ " -- - - --""." re' - .--..e* •• : 1.:: -___-_ ' . APCTE FLORIDA REGISTRATION Provide evidence of Professional Registration Pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA). State oFlorida Department o I certify from the records of this office that A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on January 17, 1995. The document number of this corporation is P95000003950. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2016,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 5,2016,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Fifth day of January,2016 ikz":, -,-.':.71— •p X - : t. lizi -Vatth.4.1,:..'.L.-..-.Vkv4. TePs_____sk (1).44 ._ -te.;.,o's 1. ,.% 2 .._4r.:441. : ... :8.. Secretary ofState Tracking Number:CC6383523207 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertiticateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 3 4 I a s • a s r nu 4 $. jp,-A. ,,,,..:1/4..... !.....-i . .C: r ,. ', ziji, ,:itt:,,i‘..:::p.s\::, s..,,,./...,,,,,,4,,,,.././....olivki;:ii: ., TV .' =, 1 ,: iji:1 41 41:: .1 illeui reii‘,1,. 1 i - • II - 1 Ilti h .mi rcvi. 1 • 7c.::411..,...is .....- . _ _ Ac mai , , :fillifill 411" . ............ , 1 IN ,_ wi " 'Na� / J 4,-/I\ - I. . _ __ _— :........--.. '. � , � 1 �► •. � • f ; _fi }, .-., � ' , • * - fr 4p -- _, . . w,11:044. .04,,, __....X; itt_',;-:',.., 7 l.''"--). .' -41117:: , .Apar 4e*tt,,....„N:W..t4le4..,'''. ` ,.!Nil' r.r -A� ti"r " �1�.•• ••y • i i,,,..t.1 kr!:Wks:a.,W,„;.•:•.''...‘..- •..‘,". ..., rs •-'..',....,•-:T.'. .b. .-::,• • ,-.40A- - . )\ ce. • - ♦'' . !yifi-� -T � - . •••.....- ,,,•.- ., <s.ti .v T.:7,7• 4 .'4 -t` _ •'�"•�, - ,`� o i • - w ..fir"'Off�� e � t • � ...• �+.•� -'''+�•.FIs r}'r�\ •\ 'i��..��,�,,~� '.� _`••a1►"1� � �"• "`!' .y ��•, � t ,;1.�;,�R ii, -.. - ' yr• L." r.•,� ;• s 4. k.3.- �►`. uw r;�. , ,, - ;,.i. 'Y11 .•�. Ir -44: `in --- !'.4 �` ,.. I* .yw S' y` 4•. 1. �,• AA's •._-.b a .1 ,7'!.--', [ . .• �•Z1i..-441 1 �l _ 144: • . f • --......,t.,...,-•fi; •` .446.7-?:;. i'•ao.a 1 ,...,'":....r:. r S . .x..,......,..„1,-,,.„,,,,..,.....k,-,...,...r,„ ' • . u'''r ♦ ' a ..-A.,-":a �. , , �Y t- .tom-`;,� ,�_ • ^:.ti ts ' � . _ 1 ;.'.-.:.---':'..t,'-',:: Z. ti~ .• • ,•,• .:;+L?• ,•-..!►+ .' - •twt2.-,-".b;,1— . +::46- — .t.1 i ,-A&P Consulting Engineers, Corp. tsSee Attached QualifyingProjects including: name, project descripon commencement and completion dates, pproject contact information (phone and email and prime proposer's role in project). ry ,...7_. r.Z-•••:-.-lajW, S"t .„. —4 ;, • ttou:-. e `fir *L..., w 4 A ,-;,.... ,_,Ir, - - .-.4.,_ :. . - 4,~+ Project Reference mi:: •■ - .*+*www...w..n.w.+m........eru....,...�m... _.......--......................+....w..,..,,...«..,...x e....w. ...w...w.«.—.r.w.......,._.,..........,.. ..w,... "7r ,— _ + — �, MIN .,' .ti' A&P Consultingt r�:: :e.fidY.�M'!'3w.1--t-.s h M'`�.a, '4-- rr 1 0✓Y1, 4: r . ;� PROJ ECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR WASHINGTON AVENUE PHASE II, IV,AND V CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach,CIP Office Jose Perez, P.E. Q Phone No.: (305) 673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z z 6115 o — email:joseperez@miamibeachfl. COMPLETION DATE September 2006 gov PROJECT LOCATION Washignton Avenue from 5th Street to Lincoln Road,City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Prepared construction documents (plans and specifications) for the follow- -'i' ing improvements:milling&resurfacing,new gravity drainage wells,sanitary .,.. . '�,. sewer capacity improvements which consisted of pipe/manhole up-sizing, water main upgrades, relocation of water meters/meter boxes, new deco- ••� rative lighting system, landscape and irrigation upgrades, replacement of , Vii, curb & gutter and sidewalk from 11th St. to 16th St., design of intersection �' .:;. . bumps outs, compliance with ADA requirements, modification of parking -.-4,-,... a -:,, ,7 - 1 i 1.-:.-„,.--' space layout,relocation of existing utilities,coordination with the CMB Park- ,. ;;�7. Ty s)f ing Department to remove and reinstall parking meter heads and parking .,0.., y ,,, signs,signature median improvements from 5th St.to 6th St.,between 16th r ;."� E �W . • F 1. to Lincoln Rd. and along Lincoln Rd from Washington Ave to Collins Ave. a ; . e V „ r Also responsible for the office administration construction progress ' ' -, :--::•t -,.; activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement ',., ...-4.-Ill''. ''',,-..* -" :Y''. _ ..�-ii `-` ' }Y +-iii- „,,,, project. Some of the construction management services provided for :40:0i4.40 this project included:Weekly construction meeting; Perform all shop = . drawing program functions;Respond to request for information (RFI s); .,,. w¢ Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules;Contract documents - - .:i # .� - _-,' c clarifications; Inspect MOT operations;and Review,track and maintain N. --' , - : `- ¢_ ~_ �. N. construction schedules.Extensive utility coordination was performed._ ° � tt� ler Coordination with Permitting /Environmental Agencies:As part of this prod- ect our firm obtained permits from Miami-Dade County DERM, Florida De- -,-, . partment of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Health Department �,�'R y '”" y ` • (DOH),and the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department. , ,: `�. �, ,;.. , \ KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta,P.E.(Principal-in-Charge),Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.(Project Manager),Eithel Sierra,P.E.(Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling,Water Eduardo Martinez,P.E.(Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfon- & Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hard- so,P.E.(Hydraulic Modeling),Lazaro Ferrero,P.E.(Water and scape, Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pave- Sewer Pipeline),Nelson Perez,P.E.(Construction Administra- ment Markings,Construction Management,etc. tion,Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 5 ingia., ' ` -.,.y...-‘,,,,r,-----,-.,:,:4,,:-.„,_ ri .-. , —_ - i ,.. � .. . . _� a , Pro eC� R ference *pr.: .,_I,. - �.. . �- A&P Consulting -',-,:7„,-.-,,,:-.:, ,-:,i1 E e =2..3,Cc,ip. _ PROJECT NAME: D-8 SERVICES FOR LUMMUS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office Jose Perez, P.E. 0 Phone No.: (305)673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Recordand CEI ServicesI- 0 6115 gz z o — email:joseperez@miamibeachfl.gov COMPLETION DATE August 2008 PROJECT LOCATION Washignton Avenue from 5th Street to Lincoln Road, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Lummus neighborhood is generally described as that area bounded by 16th --.7,,z,..,..-::::; 7'L_ 0... 4 ...,..'73-47. 4 Street to the north, 5th Street to the South, Washington Avenue to the West :-.:.-_,---,7,,-;,a,./,' _ !,_ , and Ocean Drive to the East. The area consists of multi-family structures with '7:4,,,.,!,7- , ,,, .• - -� significant retail / commercial components, portions of which are within histori- '-'-'--'4-'7 . P',.--e0.411/ 7-; 7' i-' ''''" p410cally designated areas.This neighborhood is located in the heart of South Miami ,4401.0.0-1-74` t --; . Beach and includes much of the National Register Architectural District.As part ;r '4.=.. - .19:44*7of this project we developed and prioritized streetscape and urban improve- useill__41304!` _ _ _ ments equitably throughout the neighborhood as well as upgraded water and '"0` ' ` ` '.. stormwater infrastructure in accordance with the recommendations. It is import- 4.44 7,.,... = ant to note Countyand State Roadways were not included within the scope of egit - ,f - the City's Row improvements Program. Hence, 5th Street, Collins Avenue and �:.t :,- .: 7 - `KK:X' _ Ocean Drive were excluded from the scope of this Project. In addition, Wash- •az 1.1.4 •.. _ f ington Avenue Improvements was addressed as a separate Bid Package. Also, pri"- '11.011 -;----;--47::-.-- _ 11:-...7; ',.-,.- .i N:•, ';'.'', .. ,--,....i. ,i • - public facilities outside of the ROW, such as Parks are covered b other Cit - ��'- � : _ i=< ,k? Capita! Programs. This Project was awarded in December w.�...r 2006 .,r. a I"1...�,...-. -'_�' -, . 2 0 11,.....• i.. Build Contract. Extensive utility coordination was performed.Also responsible .- -- icy. krimil --'-'- .-- for the office administration construction progress activities related to the - ` . ' ,, - construction of this right-of-way improvement project. Some of the con- - 4:77 '` struction management services provided for this project included. Weekly ; construction meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; Re- �` _ ',`-_= _ ,--- -�- sir ,�;<s-= �.�,1• +► s, .: k ig spond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to ,',61,,., ,, ceefil , , . \. project schedules; Contract documents clarifications; Inspect MOT oper- . 0 .„ ,, z, ations; and Review,track and maintain construction schedules. Extensive '�-_ -�, -= - Y:.,,.,. utility coordination was performed. '4M KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager),Alex Yi, P.E. (Roadway Design), Eduar- Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & do Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering), Amelia Alfonso, P.E. Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination,Hardscape, (Hydraulic Modeling),Lazaro Ferrero,P.E.(Water Pipeline), Nel- Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement son Perez, P.E.(Construction Administration)Juan C.Velazquez Markings, Construction Management, etc. (Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 6 ir i I .,, -.r "k _- ` Wit.a.- . � :�.�_...., ,....„C:*.,,,,,.. , ProjectReference .:,,,E ,, :_. . - -, ___...___________ __ — - _. —N - __ . g PROJECT NAME: D-8 SERVICES FOR PRAIRE AVENUE CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office Jose Perez, P.E. Q o Phone No.: (305)673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z z 6115 O — email:joseperez@miamibeachfi.gov COMPLETION DATE November 2008 PROJECT LOCATION Washignton Avenue from 5th Street to Lincoln Road, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Design-Build Project along Praire Avenue included the following im- ..-, ~ �: ,f i provement: Roadway milling and resurfacing, new Type E and F curb and ',, •.u.a ii,',-„em!:: _ ,, is„ gutter and sidewalk, new drainage system including a new deep under- . .. .M�. :------- •,;,,;,,,;, ---------- --- ground stormwater pump station structure, injection wells, upgrade of the . ,,,, . „, _t :x" existing signalized intersection at Praire Ave and Dade Boulevard from I',..-. ,-----,..,.„,4,:a.#4,':., 1. , span wire to mast arm, upgrade of the existing lighting system, compli- 7:,.._. :; . ance with ADA requirements, relocation of existing utilities, modification . , . r of main entrance and student pick-up and drop off parking lane at Miami - , Beach Senior High School, and new signing & pavement markings. Alsoe responsible for the office administration construction progress ac- tivities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement .-- - project. Some of the construction management services provided -.. - ;• ---, - n for this project included: Weekly construction meeting; Perform all -.- - -2 t e , - ' shop drawing program functions; Respond to request for information .4,--'-':'-::,':':;.:':',!::: . -_ .4 ,.3- _: . (BFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules; Contract »' - _ M -- documents clarifications; Inspect MOT operations; and Review,track : - .3 and maintain construction schedules. Extensive utility coordination -; .-'•- , - ;am 4. .----- was performed. _ — . a--• ••'..4'- .7,!:1, .►y ? .err r,» , e 4,' ..,,,,,,.. -:a.--4',-- : * .. ,v„,,: ..., 4 - .,, 4:'°, .."'.. ',W. , ,,:, -, ,f,,,,;-..-., 4 i,..., ,, "' -- * !„ --,72.;:*:Al le.,'9 zill.-21--1..')p*"' -- .?„-,.4 '. CO4 lw — lir' -*I i r .. :, ,•y. w 'fin, d yfir °;4'''.1. t., mow.i. • 'i .f ^ illty r. _* f*tea-," , KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Roadway De- Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & sign), Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Pipeline), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration, Markings, Construction Management, etc. Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 7 Illirsaiirt v.' \ -.Z.st,...1_:p;•1,-7:7:---..,,,,,;t:-..,.,.. _, � � ProjectReference krall ' es ilia* ' ' . 4067 -- .-.%---- _ 41 fi _ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineacs,Cc PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR NEIGBORH00D NO.7-NAUTILUS IMPROVEMENTS CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office Jose Perez, P.E. Q Q Phone No.: (305)673-7000 Ext. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services Z z 6115 o - email:joseperez@miamibeachfl.gov COMPLETION DATE April 2010 PROJECT LOCATION Nautilus Neighborhood, "Middle Beach"from Surprise Lake south,to the south end of 41st Street Right-of-Way, and from Biscayne Bay east to the Indian Creek Waterway, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Nautilus Neighborhood included all of the area from Surprise Lake south,to the ,. `..: . _ e, ' .. . south end of the 41st Street right-of-way, and from Biscayne Bay east to the Indian � -.. -l - " '�* ,� ,. • Creek waterway, inclusive of the Orchard Park sub-neighborhood. The area is gen- .. �, . =- `� -2:-.-- e,.;. likerall comprised of single-family residential streets with somepockets of multi-family -- -- . -- V' - Y p g Y .. • x, . _ .. uses. , � - - Streetsca a Improvements: Reconfiguration of W. 42nd St. from North Michigan ' '�'.. ,`. 1 , . '�.: ::,, - 1 :,:' p p 9 �q.�' ,.. . , x Ave.to North Meridian Ave. &the intersection of Prairie Ave. I Chase Ave/W.44th - --. - M:- . N;,:!-_,,,, 4-:':,-,.,. ---cL . ,-' _..„- St.; Landscaping within the Right-Of-Way; Lighting Upgrades; Millingand Resurfac- w= � � ' -r � _ � _ �. A , r :: l+ Storm water Improvements. 16,300 In. ft. of conveyance pipe; 92 inlets and 74 . ..,�; 1., -... : drainage manholes; Gravity drainage wells and 31 deep underground pressurized ' ..- 7 _ • " 17'..:.\-. ''. drainage well structures; 6 new deep underground stormwater pumping stations. - " ,,, --\to- "- Water Systems Improvements: 17,500 In.ft.(Priority 2)of New 8"DIP Water Main; :_' . 11115:464 ', ,,, Q:, L �� 16,444 In. ft. (Priority 3) of new 8" DIP Water Main; Relocation of 172 water me- `:. _ 7 '. . . 4 :-It! 2 ' ters (priority two) and 5 water meters (priority three) from rear easements to then ' public sidewalks through trenchless technology. Extensive utility coordination was .., _ , ‘,. il441 performed. _ =:- :,: �., - ' ltuarAL Also responsible for the office administration construction progress activities -. - -, ,: - - `?• i related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement project. Some =:.,.,;Zit-' 4sy - of the construction management services provided for this project included: =: -4"`,, 2 . i . �' Weekly construction meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; .� , • 1`' Respond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to0 1.project schedules; Contract documents clarifications; Inspect MOT opera- i tions; and Review,track and maintain construction schedules. Extensive util- , .; .; --. , ity coordination was performed. •-,-.%., KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge). Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Amelia Alfonso, Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Pipe- Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement line), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration, Juan C. Markings, Construction Management, etc. Velazquez(Senior Inspector) , A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 8 1116111Ci , . '{ ► , to 4 ., � "4--�, ... of J f V . .u � �.�_ Project Reference -01 .: • ✓ A&P Consulting° , -: t t. - .v - —. PROJECT NAME: DADE BLVD. BIKE PATH AND SEAWALL(MIAMI BEACH, FL.) CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office 1-- Q o Hermes Diaz, P.E. APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering & Inspection Services z Z Phone No.: (305)799-3611 o0 — email: COMPLETION DATE September 2011 PROJECT LOCATION Dade Blvd. Bike Path and Seawall, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION APCTE serves as a prime consultant for this project; performing inspections and construction management services. The budgeted construction cost is approximately$4 million. The project includes the construction of a new seawall, a bike path, landscaping,a new traffic signal, signing and pavement markings, curb & gutter, water main improvements, and improvements to the existing outfalls located on the Colins Canal. This contract is separated into three portions: Dade Blvd. Seawall, Dade Blvd Bike Path, and Washington Ct. Neighborhood Improve- ment. The new seawall is over a 1/2 mile in length and runs parallel to the Colins Canal, along Dade Blvd.The Dade Blvd. Bike Path runs adjacent to the seawall and includes traffic signal improvements;which are located at the intersection of Dade Blvd.and Bay Rd. and include the installation of a new mast arm and two auxiliary posts. A portion of the funds for this project were appropriated from the American Resource Recovery Act(ARRA). Due to the fact that ARRA funded projects must comply with certain stipulations imposed by the federal government,APCTE ensures that all appropriate com- plianceprocedures are met. Compliance efforts include - .... .., p� p15! �;��,..� field interviews, EEO administration, DBE administra- : M tion, daily reports, material certifications, and contract 1 ,4, »1 6, management. fir 4.'!" 0 i_ 0 0 **4 , APCTE ,, *.'lsi v: � Due to the nature of this project, HPC E must remain :4 " -y : ; . •s .�. .4 A I TV '� ' *• '1, .17,..g' � : �� r r. versatile in order to provide a broad construction man- '.`- "° ""� -4 ,. - agement effort, while managing the critical activities at -k -- construction site. Moreover, the close relationship that - . APCTE has with the governmental/regulatory agencies w ? .,. , in Miami-Dade County, assisted in facilitating the FDOT :. compliance process and ensuring that all FDOT and . , , ' ," '.--, CMB requirements are met at all times. : ;.:--'- i f �aww„ M.: a9::: a °' ,w w .r ar:""'�tM �` vl� as f4,. ,. .x. . ,,,,;=',4,-;Y..`,f 1:''''''-s ',-., 4,,,,* ' ''. ' 211=1,4 11:37 , o- fSj2 .4.4,:j,f.-V .,.,, . KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Ad- Construction Management ministration, Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) r , A&P Consulting Transporta.ion Engineers,Corp. 9 Mow . �„ ` + . `!R '„ �. � .� - , . .1ye a« Project Re , J • � � .,� , � ,, � - ,. ___ - _ w , _ � � _N ^. . A&P Consulting - --:: 7,.,v .-1 Er _, I— ,.. PROJECT NAME: INDIAN CREEK SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office Q o Roberto Rodriguez APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering& Inspection Services Z Z Phone No.: (305)216-6238 o i email: COMPLETION DATE July 2012 PROJECT LOCATION Indian Creek and 69th Street, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION APCTE provided design and construction services for the signalization improvements at Indian Creek Drive and 69th St.The construc- tion cost of this project was approximately$180,000 and the project limits included the intersection of Indian Creek Dr. and 69th St. The scope of work included the installation of three new mast arms, ped signals, an auxiliary signal post, sidewalk replacement,ADA compliance, and the installation of push buttons in the adjacent fire station. Being that one of the main purposes of this project was to facilitate ingress and egress for an adjacent fire station; close coordination with the CMB Fire Department was an absolute necessity. Another crucial component of this project was the installation of a new Miami-Dade Public Works Department (MDPWD) service disconnect.The installation of the new service disconnect required vast coordination between the City of Miami Beach (CMB) Capital Improvements Office and MDPWD. APCTE provided contract administration, document control, inspection services,field reports,and material testing verifica- tion for this project. In order to effectively review and approve ' proposals and payment requisitions;an intimate knowledge of w.n JOC contracts, often used by CMB, was necessary through- - ,. out the entire project. a c iii .., , k f :NNN‘' All*gotyji: '' - f''.Nw J a u \ - ,KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Ad- Construction Management ministration, Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 10 Ilierii... , 7 \ , � Project; . i • , , - ..'iiti,!-- . .7.',, L ' 11:`,... .�,;4• ..-, y• ..;,- ` _ _ :t.,' yay 7-0 ' ' Reference —_ - ..=---ANIN .,'IL _ . A&P Consulting --.1.,,7,:,---;,:i-:,---,E n* -�':, :2'r- ____ PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 1 -BISCAYNE POINT/BISCAYNE BEACH CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office F- Carla Dixon a APCTE ROLE EngineerPhone No.: (305)673-7000 Ext. of Record and CEI Services t-- u- 0 z z 7071 0 COMPLETION DATE June 2014 t-' email:carladixon@miamibeachfl.gov PROJECT LOCATION Biscayne Point Neighborhood "North Beach"area is bounded by Stillwater Drive to the north, Biscayne Point Island to the south, and Biscayne Beach to the east, City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Prepared construction documents(plans and specifications)for the following im- M = 3 ! is 1 C4 a `4 ' `♦ 4 � - ' *Z, provements: develop new typical section and roadway plans for Stillwater Drive, `' : ''_' ' a�/m.z� ,,°;x,/ '''',''''',;,4'-',:':'',:;'il'ill: provide edge of pavement profile(EOP),longitudinal profile of the three hot spots ' w '-' "� ,'-.i. • . at Biscayne Point Island, new drainage system with deepunderground gravity -.7......---. ..-;-:t.:, = _i Y g Y g ...::::-74.1-:---7:4_, well structures at Stillwater Drive and Biscayne Beach, as well as the drainage 4 : 1g,,1 .�T ..„,14:.in t r m in r _ F:.. x �r�, _ �.design for three hot spots at Biscayne Pot, wa e a upg ades, new dec 4,,�2 = - -- �: y orative lighting system at Stillwater Drive, landscape and irrigation upgrades, 7'.411 .:` t--w -** .,',_,4<` fig g Y p 9 p9 _ , . update signing and pavement markings for the three sub-neighborhoods. Also ___,--.0"'-c-44-+ '. ��l�'e,t responsible for the office administration construction progress activities Alt- it :- tr'73 ::?,7r;*,related to the construction of this ri ht of wa im rovement ro'ect. Some .+''" .44- - ,^ N' x, x 0. . lig of the construction management services provided for this project includ- ..M.,;, ,;ed:Weekly construction meeting; Perform all shop drawing program funcirohyl.:- -'10°107...i,'!:-&-kr.,_ ► - .. .:• -° eY � tions; Respond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for --- '�- changes to project schedules; Contract documents clarifications; Inspect ''"' _ -,..4 ::A1116�'-'- :7- MOT operations; peM tios. and Review, track and maintain ainain consvuction schedules •y�;♦ " �1, ' r ;r�-~ � hp. : , . .,..-;ji,„:::--, -7, ' Extensive utility coordination was performed. ,�-:, : ii.... > w _ : rt ` - µ:ViCoordina#ion with PermittingI Environmental Agencies: As part of this proj- '-i, • � .� � � . -,�� M ,-'1,4- ir,... ect our firm obtained permits from Miami-Dade County DERM, Florida Depart- P - ,,,,*-•'.€ _ -1, ment of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Health Department (DOH), �. - , " :. -7. . and the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department. �- i:' , ,,, f:. . .. ' „,„7.•._. dr:,,......z -,, a - . ..-'. 7, . ,...,.. 4. ,.. 7t. . 4-4......,—,../ -,,i1..._. , . . -' ...,.,,:. ..., ,. _ ...... , „ ....4 . ,.,. , , A-- pg.. .,, ., ,,,,...,,,...,,,, . „.,.., . , .,,,,,....,,, . .. .• , ; ,,, .,‘,..,,, . ,•,. . e, ,.,is . . . • . ..,, ,, .,,i,.. ,• _,, . , •, - , ..,.. .....H. .,. KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Hera, P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Roadway De- Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & sign), Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Pipeline), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration, Markings, Construction Management, etc. Juan C. Velazquez(Senior Inspector) I A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 11 . --- . i ,,,, .-----..::,. - 4r.,•- - - - - - - : - Project Reference a1 W.me- - ..... .,4ffig*j A&P Consulting n r,.i rl `s1 r ,( , ..._:. --; t, • 7-- ----,-1....:, PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR CRESPI BOULEVARD CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach,CIP Office i-- Bruce Mow P.E. c) Mowry, 0 Phone No.: (786)759-8941 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services 'z z O _ email•BruceMowry@miamibeachfl. COMPLETION DATE July 2015 U gov PROJECT LOCATION • Crespi Boulevard,City of Miami Beach, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Removed 55 LF of existing seawall and constructed a new seawall and pump station,as part of the Crespi Boulevard Project. DMSI also installed rubble rip-rap at the point of the pump station discharge into the bay as required by the DRER and USACOE permit requirements.The new seawall was 15'in depth and it was raised in efforts to account for future sea level rises.The proposed seawall is intended to have a top elevation of 5.50 Ft. NAVD.The project consisted of the installation of a proposed collection system includ- ing 23 proposed inlets, 13 manholes, and 2,370 LF of drainage lines installed along Crespi Boulevard from Hawthorne Avenue to 84 Street. Proposed pump station and proposed 8-ft x 4-ft box culvert discharge connection with manatee grate was installed in-place of the existing 18"outfall located at the east side of Crespi Boulevard/81 Street intersections.Also responsible for the office admin- istration construction progress activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement project.Some of the construction management services provided for this project included:Weekly construction meeting; Perform all shop draw- ing program functions; Respond to request 7.:,47:47.77� �-yr 1 _ . 1111117 for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request it:,--* r. , ' , y__IL i.- i 11._� ,1; '' im.-, :,, for changes to project schedules; Contract *ill'....' f _ 1 ,.' ' : is 1 iilif documents clarifications; Inspect MOT oper- `�' ti i ',' ations; and Review, track and maintain con- .-: :.. '•-. ,: - 2.- ' `� _._ struction scneauies.Extensive utilitycoordi- - _ " i,�_•.,,o--4....'T4.,- y�, .; = dikIL nation was performed. .�-. --k ;{ .y . N r ,,. ,,,..1. ,,,,,,,,, ,.., , r I '� 1 F,.. ..,.�.�,..„.,..,,rte; .,.... :- -.- ‘..„ — „ ,_ . .. • —.twig M .,.. , , . .:. tilll 1 , . .., ,,._,_,,,,.......,.,....,,,,_ „ _ .... ..... 4,....„—...„4„,..,,,,,,,,,,„...,„:,,„ ....,,,,,, ,. _,...., ..., — „..„, „..,. ...,,,: „.._ • ., ,. . e ajar..., , ,..,” . ,. , .. _,....,,. ......, ..., g 'A„,:,. �y w .*7b,.„, ..`rS. .„.• .„,„,,,;,,:,, , y rine eta,: W .#,a..•„::.--..:-.z.."..... --..-, mss '.r4' .,,, •iii y. f KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager),Alex Yi, P.E. (Roadway Design), Eduar- Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water& do Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfonso, P.E. Sewer Main Design,Permitting, Utility Coordination,Hardscape, (Hydraulic Modeling),Lazaro Ferrero, P.E.(Water Pipeline),Nel- Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement son Perez,P.E.(Construction Administration)Juan C.Velazquez Markings, Construction Management,etc. (Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Cod. 12 Oirogiu.-t, . i - 4 scii-te.e:-::•..i; '."- . . ',, '''-: . ',441:4-,s•t441.- - 1 . 7,-,,.....- . _„ :. , „E.:. * , _ Project .'' Reference , .... _• - - t ^ w.as+w.....wrvronv 11111111 _ -- ^_ � = ---- - , , A&P Consulting --,,,,..7,,,,--,,,,,,.;:. r5Ji.M,,,tl;. ER7"k "' , : �M^ r __ - PROJECT NAME: D-B SERVICES FOR 11TH STREET ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION CLIENT NAME City of Miami Beach, CIP Office i- Igor Vassiliev o g 0 Phone No.: (305)546-5891 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z z email:i orvassiliev miamibeachfl. o z — g @ COMPLETION DATE August 2016 ° goy PROJECT LOCATION 11th Street roadway reconstruction from Jefferson Avenue to Euclid Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Prepared construction documents(plans and specifications)for the following improvements:Develop new typical section and roadway reconstruction plans along 11th Street from west of Jefferson Avenue to east of Euclid Avenue, new 54-inch Force Main, new 30-inch sanitary gravity sewer, upgrade to existing pump station No. 1, new drainage system, water main upgrades, new decorative lighting system, replacement of existing span wire to mast arm signalized intersections at Meridian Avenue and Euclid Avenue,landscape and irrigation upgrades, update signing and pavement markings. Also responsible for the office administration construction prog- ress activities related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement project. Some of the construction management services provided for this project included: Weekly construction meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; Respond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules; Contract documents clar- ifications; Inspect MOT operations; and Review, track and maintain construction schedules. Extensive utility coordination was perfomred. This project includes harmonization design treatments to properties due to grade differential between the proposed and existing grades. Coordination with Permitting I Environmen- . ,� ;lie” ,� �r -• , T _;,� tal Agencies: As part of this project our firm t �� r J. 'y 7- — -3 m _ obtained permits I IIID II o I I IVI-V County Dept. .ofL.17.;,. ,,, - : .:::..,...2::,-,...-7. `3 - ,,,, "�'_,,:.-- :: ; 7 Regulatory and Ecomonic Resources (DRER), :4"4 .;4:41....t,..7.''''';•;---."• Igt,72- I _ '... �,. . +r s Environmental Pr t ft7-,,,:... foec- r - Florida Departmento �> �-�. _ � - �:: ., �.�.� � ^ �� �::..� r ,� _� tion(FDEP), Florida Health Department(DOH), - -_- 11 :• i 's'-. .1- ..,. w o (^ �-,... ,t,,,,,.: 7. .'•N r`,7:' . �;: '3'x,1 and the Cityof Miami Beach Public Works De- »... ., ` !fir•• ti♦ •,. �. ,.it . 4 , . i .,,k.,4 pa rtm e nt , ,"- --,..- -.:4,,,,f,,,,:, _-il,-. ..::: ,,,,,,-- .... . _-, .,. ,. ,,„ AT 11-111%Wilk, - , ' '-'':',,t'-',-..„-r:1-,t;:;;,. . ', :1_,,2.,,,a,........4** ---Alltyr 41111-4 ', i.e., - - . .. . -. ...... -., _-. ,„.., • ,,,, , 4... , .;fit.r.r.:::' ,: :.-43. :, ', , . - -...---. . --'—,t. 7.* ':-.:''''' * --P4) • x,1/4 • .—'-'''.--; "*--,7'.3� t . .-'-1,','':_i:2; ' „,4'„...-.--,-.::-.%;.,'Afosl' '41 . ,._ .,.....-.,. - , --,,,, • „ ,...._ .:.__ ..--_,,,:1-4 7 �T / ..1.^ i. .. wad , J, ri•Iw.M� =7 ,,,, 4, c, - air eZ .�' '=2 . ,, •. KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, RoadwayDesign, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & P.E. (Project Manager), Frank Lena, P.E. (Roadway Design), g ' y Eduardo Martinez P.E. (Electrical En ineerin Arnelio Alfon- Sewer Main DesignPermittingUtility Coordination, Hardscapeg g)' Landscape, Lighting, Si nalization Signing and Pavement so, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction p ' Signalization, g Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector), Phili Markings, Cons#ruction Management, new 54-inch Force Administration)' p Main new 30-inch SanitaryGravitySewer etc. Garcia (Senior Inspector) Sewer, etc. Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 13 Referenceaim., ' , '' \ -.....t.,44,41-:-..e.,:-;;;.*:-., If ,, - IN 't;" Pro est :,,,,* i 1 vim 01.f• A . .....;.,,,,,,,)' . f.:_., __ . - _ Consulting PROJECT NAME: DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT CLIENT NAME City of Miami CIP Office Q o Onuigbo Valentine, P.E.E. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services Z z Phone No.: (305)416-2588 o — email:ovalentine©miamigov.com COMPLETION DATE March 2012 PROJECT LOCATION Downtown Miami from Biscayne Blvd.to Miami Ave and from SE 2nd St to NE 3rd St., Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION This contract included the removal and replacement of concrete . , pK -.r,.,.,; *;M ` . ' Y�. sidewalks and curb and utter, millingand resurfacingof the �.t.. .20,4010h,',41,44 4i ''�t' , .f, "�'�"` . ', " involved roads, striping, provided stamped crosswalks at every 'il; „, ‘ �, f „: *,-4 . .- - '�.' a� � intersection, construction of new colored sidewalks and ADA .,�: light system, utility box - ti - .,-.-1.:- ramps, conduit installation for new street sys em, utility r . Vie►`.,':�` t�, � s t' t cover adjustments and landscaping,all done at night to minimize ` 7 :t -. '''"' the construction impact to the public during regular business R 5 ' -'4 -imine- hours. Directly involved in the public information and coordina- ..;•-=::a' '°_ �' '_ y,, - tion with business owners, building administrators, Miami Dade . ....: '-' ' .1.: -,i.;,_"6-7-... .,.::. iler.. ;:''AI ,. :: , - ,Iiii Parking Authority,etc. Project limits were:NW/NE 1st, 2nd, and 7,. .._. -° ---- -- 3rd Street from SW 1st Ave. to SR 5/ Biscayne Blvd.; SW/ SE .:y : - £..__. ti. i 1st and 2nd Street from SW 1st Ave.to SR 5/Biscayne Blvd; and t . - i . , 11., 1 ; .. . SW 1st Ave, Miami Ave, NE 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Avenue from SW 'f. - ` • aera / SE 2nd Street to NW / NE 3rd Street. Also responsible for : :„ . } u�— '--T- l► '" the office administration construction progress activities - ,� related to the construction of this right-of-way improvement rovement "- . . ►! �' g Y p i. y. ; project. Some of the construction management services provided for this project included: Weekly construction pF1 „ •�e meeting; Perform all shop drawing program functions; Re- ;> �.„ ,. f�::3.���fop,— ..." — ,.':-'-'170 spond to request for information (RFI's); Evaluate Request - -,. , .a. ,. - -------_-_-_,--: ,....ii 0 -. • for changes to project schedules; Contract documents clar- _ ifications; Inspect MOT operations; and Review, track and " ' -, ` maintain construction schedules. Extensive utility coordi- .,, ,....4:,_ - �, �W.�.�a•.M "•K,.- 4 +.w.l ,.. nation was performed. mY x AP., ow ,. ter_ , M. KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Project Manager), Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineer- Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & ing),Arnelio Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, P.E. (Water Resources), Osmany Alfonso(Structural Desing), Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration), Evelio Her- Markings, Construction Management, etc. nandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 14 NW._ . ,,,, '' MI 0 . 't . o �• ;�'...-.':•:::1:44 y�a--4.7;f4,-.4*.:: Project Reference ' _ ° �" — _ __ ' , A&P Consulting y r.i,-.. r., - —r .2- l.-2.. .-_ . t -a _ Lte_re _ , , .: PROJECT NAME: MIAMI RIVER GREENWAY SW 1ST COURT TO SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE CLIENT NAME City of Miami CIP Office Q o Orlando Misas APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services Z Z Phone No.: (305)416-1038 o - email:ornisas@miamigov.com COMPLETION DATE December 2015 PROJECT LOCATION Downtown Miami from Biscayne Blvd. to Miami Ave and from SE 2nd St to NE 3rd St., Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Engineer of Record l Project Manager for the design and preparation of Contract Plans and Specifications of the FDOT LAP's funded project for the extension of the Miami River Greenway from SW 1st Court to South Miami Avenue. Scope of Work was based on the City of Miami River Master Plan and included milling&resurfacing,decorative side-walk reconstruction,decorative lighting, new drain- age, amenities, signing &pavement marking, and landscaping. Project also involved the preparation of the Technical Memorandum, utility coordination, preparing cost estimates,obtaining all permits including DERM, Miami-Dade County Public Works, FDOT,and co- ordination Miami Dade Transit to obtain a Maintenance Agreement for the construction of the new sidewalk under the existing M-Path and FPL to upgrade the existing lighting .s, a system. Also responsible for the office . • ., ^'.., -- y` administration construction progress -�. .• '- `C °�` , -� a. " - r. ,- -r r 'x-w ,,N .7.w! f4,.;, r .' activities related to the construction of - t ' ` ° 6 *' . '�� �'a r0 1 e .':✓�„ ••s � M++S.� yw���a�� w. �ti4M� .nL t.Y'�. r y rc y► ,.�+.. 4C y .' this right-of-way improvement project. -ate- �a ,,,-. ° ,w,a .,', f ' �` r Some of the construction management li, .fl. t.. -=services rovided for this roaect in- 7N&,,,,."' ''..-,.: . „w;a cluded: Weekly construction meeting; ► ,�,j Perform all shop drawing program , , ..a , �, �� �� -� :' _ functions, Respond to request for in- ti i ,. �... __- 1. '` !..:,,,t. � formation (RF1's) ; Evaluate Re uest for -6 4.a sii ,,... ychanges to project schedules; Contract - ar ., t : i ..'-*ft— '-'+'' '. , ,,,,,'. , . documents clarifications; Inspect MOT .�, ._ = operations;and Review,track and main- .,1 iii ,,, � t --.-, tarn construction schedules. Extensive -.! .._...-4(- .x w }} �� t- wh. a ^�—� 'ri" .. ��,,//1� .�td „4 ,r utility coordination was performed. ---: _�• , Z:# _ ./f 4 , 7 :-: '.ri ''Rr'"' tel. w. ..b , µye KEY PERSONNEL I ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Roadway Design), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Water & Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio Alfon- Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardscape, so, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (Water and Landscape, Lighting, Signalization, Signing and Pavement Sewer Pipeline), Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administra- Markings, Construction Management, etc. tion), Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 15 lleirii ., '''+'''; - f '', "r i • .i., . ;.,. . -4014-''': .11 . Iry;::::.-''7:-..i.Z:2:;•i.:::::-.. )1, i -- ,,,,,,,,,,,-,..- ,..., 4'ff't"-.44i.t.41(":"1-, '",' Project Reference , . =,...v.,--- - ,„, - -, v ,. _ _- �- ii" "41 A&P Consulting-.-;---,,,..,--.3,t,-, ,.f, tn. , .., as Cc).-;, PROJ ECT NAME: MIC STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation District 6 �- A,, ,, Ricardo Salazar, P.E. Q o Phone No.: (305)470-5264 APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEI Services z z Fax No.: (305)470-5293 o - email:ricardo.salazar@dot.state. COMPLETION DATE May 2008 fl.us PROJECT LOCATION Miami Intermodal Center, between LeJeune Road &NW 37th Ave. and NW 21st Street and NW 25th Street, Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed drainage improvements are also solving the his- ,. . , ..�. torical flooding problems present in the area north of NW 25th g -. �.w . , Street that is within the limits of System 11 of the MIC Drainage -a , '" " " `� .. `y` " � Master Plan. System 11 includes the area located east of Le- :: , .,,; Jeune Road up to NW 37th Ave. and between NW 21st Street -� : ,•� and NW 29th Street.The C-4 Canal (Tamiami Canal) is the ma- 4 - t,-,,i.: ,-,►..f. " .. jor canal serving this basin.There is reported flooding along NW "� 26th Street, thus a new deep underground stormwater pump At A __ . ` station was installed at the southeast corner of the intersec- K r;F.. T tion between NW 25th Street and NW 39th Ave. The proposed -. '7,:,:, , .'1)4 `� Pump Station was located at the south side of NW 25th Street ', ' � ,--.,:,..i,,....,,,,,,:-....,,,,,., ` ,- approximately 100 feet east of NW 39th Ave. These systems �M w��7.' , :�,��, - �- ,.., provide water quality treatment and discharge into a 60" outfall pipe that discharges into the Tamiami Canal (C-4),just west of .� . the Wyndham HoteL Also responsible for the office adminis- tration construction progress activities related to the con- •= , - ;rex y. ,.w „ ) �„„9',1,+40 ,�'ro , ,,«s`` struction of this right-of-way improvement project. Some g F � of the construction management services provided for this ,, - ::„ ' # t, 3� project included: Weekly construction meeting; Perform , ,,-,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,•:;:., 4 ° all shop drawing program functions; Respond to request '' �-i s ' "F for information RF1's ; Evaluate Request for changes to r .: ''''' _,. 4.41 :,, project schedules, Contract documents clarifications, i':: ,� ;, : r -aV Ir ' , :w t.`r'„,, 4,,„ '.: ' . ���,,:`. Inspect MOT operations; and Review, track and maintain ••'',,,,,,, �F`,..,- 4 construction schedules. Extensive utility coordination was ” `� erformed. 4, KEY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Carlos M. Gil-Mira, RoadwayDesign, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modelin , Water & P.E. (Project Manager), Eithel Serra, P.E. Project Engineer), g ' Yg( Sewer Main Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination, Hardsca e, Arnelio Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. Landscape, Lighting, Si nalization, Signing and Pavement Resources , Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Adminis- p ggg(Water ) Markin s, Construction Management, etc. tration), Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) g l A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 16 Milillif. ' . ''i -7 gqiir, ' --- �_ ,.. Project Reference....... Fri , kmi.-.::.- . , '- w ,,�- ._.«..-. .. w A&P Consulting ,,,nin,ortation Engineers, . PROJECT NAME: PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL(POMT) CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation District 6 Harold Desdunes, P.E. Q o Phone No.: (305)470-5271 APCTE ROLE Technical Advisory, Review and CEI Services z z Fax No.: (305)470-5547 u — email:harold.desdunes@dot.state. COMPLETION DATE June 2014 fl.us PROJECT LOCATION Port of Miami Tunnel (POMT)from Watson Island to Dodge Island, Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tunnel under Government Cut, Roadway work on Dodge and *-----— - -- -A'''T' — a...., Watson Islands, MacArthur Causeway Bridge widening, and a 43 foot diameter tunnel boring machine specifically constructed jy3l/� s kyr,Vi��H��T���1������`"�+ nye w., ��. •g for the project. The Port of Miami Tunnel (POMT) project is an �� `.N , w integral component of a larger program incorporating operational ' improvements to SR-836/Dolphin Expressway(from the existing - �,..,,,,,�, , toll station)to the 1-95 and 1-395 Interchange. Multiple options for fir----� , -w....�m.,M,' ..�-. !.1.y- _-�..... increasing port access were explored. Only the Watson Island " y-� { ` _ �: a:,:F, w, \ tunnel met all requirements of local, state and federal standards. Y .u.---,: i `_ �` ..� J y�" The Project included a tunnel under Government Cut, Roadway #: '4 '�� 4' +- • J MacArthur ausewa Bride . ,. i .' '- ., •• II'work on Dod e and Watson Islands, C y g Tv .,„ � ., Dodge �widenin and a 43 foot diameter tunnel borin machine s ecifi- , '� 7 „-- ,,.. '..�9 9 p ��� a. s�-- _�. cally constructed for the project was used.APCTE has provided i t--- ti ._,. _,r•---# �-_- -- ,,, ...., .. .15A tan the following professional services as part of the PB Americas . ,it.: fi -= — Team. Project Manager for technical advisory and plans review, .: �,. ' rt- -.. 3=- .,v),= >, ..: ,'--.( — and Construction Engineering & Inspection (CEI) Services. .-- 'iii,- . : '`• . .• #``\ '\\. We performed the following tasks: Responsible for daily in- . , , �. ' N., 7 N sections of the Roadway including earthwork, milling, as- °-,. A" , ,,. phalt and utilities such as FP&L,sewer and water,etc. ;con- 11L. .- :.-.......--,---, - .,,-, ,- ....., _ crete plant for the inspection of the concrete segments for . . r''.4,.. il;,--- ‘,--- - -.- _ . _ .- .... i the Tunnnel, inspection of the MacArthur Causeway bridge 111 .' widening including foundation (drilled shafts 42"dia.),foot- rm.' ~;A-k _ ins, columns, caps, etc. i • g 1 II KEY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Project Engineer), Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineer- ing),Arnelio Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, Technical Advisory, Plans Review for Compliance, and Con- P.E. (Water Resources), Mauricio Castillo, P.E. (Roadway struction Engineering and Inspection Services Inspector) Eduardo Fleites (Roadway Inspector), Rene Macha- do (Senior Roadway Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 17 11511a., 'R-OF - ' - 1 4#� `I 4 i .: � Mrd w �_ - . k 7 ::: Project Reference witrii 1 , —_ . - ;' A&P Consulting .a;.-ri r''1!i '1:: 1. y: —',/,—, �� . —,(__ ,— ►•' ....... --—— PROJ ECT NAME: N.W.25TH STREET VIADUCT PROJECT CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation District 6 Claudio Diaferia, P.E. Q o Phone No.: (305)499-2392 APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering & Inspection Services z z Fax No.: (305)499-2351 o — email:claudio.diaferia©dot.state. COMPLETION DATE August 2016 fl.us PROJECT LOCATION N.W. 25th Street from the Palmetto Expressway(SR 826)to NW 89th Court, Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves two major parts:the roadway reconstruction •Hm4f:4 and widening of NW 25 Street from the Palmetto Expressway t . *m" ' A� -4,,,,,':: ` kS� '' N 5 (SR 826) to NW 89 Court and the construction of a viaduct. The - x w " , viaduct,elevated about 30 feet,is situated mainly along the north • J' . side of NW 25 Street and will connect with the existing east via- � . ,,,,,,,,. -., ,,,;,,,,:,..:, duct over the Palmetto Expressway and touch down just east of " "? NW 82 Avenue.The project also included: ,„----,,,7 \ ',,,,,,, '` Ps . "',:,, \I' '''; -:(,2;:::,:t; , ''lit, ; ', ".;# , l• Wideningof NW 25 Street over the North Line Canal; , .: ,,,,,iii.,,,,,4.,,,,,,,,, • The addition of a third westbound through lane from NW 82 ., ..,„„,.- .- .-,, ,i Avenue to NW 89 Court; i !_• Addin dual left-turn lanes on NW 87 Avenue to NW 25 ____-_314.,„„,,,. "` �,.� 4. X Adding Street; .a �4 • Adding dual right-turn lanes from NW 84 Avenue to east- ...1 �- -: ; '"7., ,* :Y� .. _ , -. ; y �� bound NW 25 Street; ;tom. ; . . ,, =,.� �%,;•n it'- tom' ,. • Adding dual left-turn lanes on NW 82 Avenue to NW 25 ;: �� . ti M X45 Street; �` f���.� �_� � .� ��� ,�� • Adding dual left-turn lanes on westbound NW 25 Street to 4,, ,,,kitt., �* .�-- _ s, .. southbound NW 82 Avenue; s - -` ..' i ;AA ' • Updated signing andpavement markings; `� R 4.: p g g g .) ,. • New landscaping and brick pavers in medians. y`.. -,. . ., ,.,,,2., wry. f. 4,..r - ::'''*.::. ''1-7''",..ik‘ :7-Iiiii't .',;k.Z.,,-74'.41/:- ,t om_' T' --. F r' .� ` .'.-rr, t,.. . „, , Ade- ,, ,‘ ,,,,, , .,,_ ,„,,,, ..,... ,i,,, , ...... ,,,,,,, . i e i=',.'1 ,. lig! 1„ . `t ,r f.. ,- , .ik ~ +'ate. : ',..A.,- „ -44...,,, ‘frit,,,,,.., ,,,.... .., -.-.--....1 ‘,- ..,,,vit.e. ,,,,,----_KEY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Nelson V. Perez, P.E. (Sr. Project Engineer), John Williams(Project Administra- dor Bridge),Juan Medina, P.E. (Project Administrador Road- Construction Management and Construction Inspectionection Services way), Jorge Manso, P.E. (Senior Bridge Inspector), Ramon Liana, E.I. (Contract Support Specialist),Jason Perez(Senior Roadway Inspector),Alex Milz(Senior Roadway Inspector) A&P ConsultingTransportationEngineers,En ineers,Corp. 18 .,, .ffirsa. .„--.: .- . .-- : . - ,, ,: ` • 4 ProjectReference -- ------ -ii--- _ --- ..' :__ _ _ .; — .., •.:.,,i • ——J--" A&P Consulting t:... , :. , . -_ -,-.-, PROJECT NAME: GOVERMENT CUT UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECTS CLIENT NAME Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department 1— Ronald Fields, P.E. d o Phone No.: (305)514-3100 APCTE ROLE Construction Engineering & Inspection Services zz O _ Fax No.: (305)261-5737 COMPLETION DATE October 2012 c) email:fields@pbworld.com PROJECT LOCATION Goverment Cut Channel and Fisherman's Channel, Miami, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Relocation of a 54-inch FM underneath Government Cut Channel & • • 20"WM underneath Fisherman's Channel. The Scope of Work for this 'a. -----1 - . , — ' _, contract was to provide Contract Administration and Construction Man- -- "I'wl.''' •, agement Services for the 54" Force and 20" Water Main relocation. '.. Water Main Scope was to facilitate future deepening and widening of = --s, ':-. '---� • :�, Fisherman's Channel.The scope of work included: - • Installed and placed into service new 24"and 12"water lines inside #41-14 �'� s-: p' "'``-,',� u,,f''''''' --,..,;,44,,;,„ . b L � ii r a minimum 60" casing through approx. 800 If of micro-tunnel with 1 ..4 - �- ' . �, deep shafts for entry and retrieval on Port Island and Fisher Island ,-.4,4, '�� , �`* ' -----.,.,-;:ii , 1 a.'F�. -,.-7.,.:7s—„,,* �rte; b"`"�'�.►rrr�. ,• ,. respectively. •.� :- , � .`x �'„ = b ,„ • Installed and placed into service a new 54"force main inside a 72" �'�4 ' w,,��� »' "�"e'"".,t,,,.,,�,,. ': R .1 '; casingvia approx. 1100 If of micro-tunnel. ,h° --• j - y,,,,."1 pp • 80' deep shafts for entry and retrieval of micro-tunneling boring �.:'` , ,'- . machines(MTBM). . • Prepared existing section of 54'• Force Main under Government , . Cut for removal byanother contractor (cleaning, disinfection, cut- ; ,a 3ortor,-- ting of existing 54" pipe). ' �Y �fi • Prepared section of existing 20" water Main under Fisherman's ). ,., p .,.4•=- •--` `` .. 4, Channel for removal by another contractor under a separate con- ,. ,- - µwq. ... tract. .. {j� - - .x . ,.+,.� N+� a".: ~ General Activities: Mobilization and design submittals; build Port Island '' ., -` .,. .» x a ,it f shaft&procure micro-tunnel equipment;build shaft at Fisher Island and ,,. meteringstation at Port Island; micro-tunneling & casinginstallation; ,. -,.p�, connections; testing; and grouting pipes; restoration and cleanup. ../..,' aier .„."" ,4 s ,.. -.--' 4,„„0"e --<-10/414 , .a,rc= , ..sem ' KEY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Carlos M. Gil-Mera, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Erik Sibila, P.E. (Sr. Inspector),Armando Rubio (Project Administrator),Juan Contract Administrator and Construction Management Services Carlos Velasquez(Sr. Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 19 illy ir ttlit ' ' - s., --.., ' 'f\ --ii.:-.. :.,,5,,t7:-..„;:.-4..,:-..., , ` : ms . Project Reference `1 . ....riiiit • . W - . ______,.... A&P Consulting . . , ,--alt"' '.. ----.:: ,-, ••••':, 1:77- —7--__ i PROJ ECT NAME: NW 109 AVENUE NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CLIENT NAME City of Doral Q , Jorge Gomez, P.E. APCTE ROLE Engineer of Record and CEi Services Phone No.: (305)593-6740 o — email:jorge.gomez@cityofdoral.com COMPLETION DATE August 2016 v PROJECT LOCATION NW 109 Avenue from NW 41 Street to NW 50 Street, Doral, Florida PROJECT DESCRIPTION Engineer of Record / Project Manager for the design and .,A. . 4,;1, .. i'lr ,:. . of Contract Plans and Specifications of this ro ~' preparation p P j- • ''• `` r ry �� `� i i. ect to design a new roadway. The new NW 109th Avenue . : ,,y . , T,j� -, connection gives almost 900 households and several busi- f` 0-`" nesses an alternative to heavilyused avenues, NW 107th "-'�'J ' `: Yy r' and NW 112th. This roadway improvement project com- i :I _P. :X ,e►; .„ ,,..1.r-..,--,-,, t r• w pleted ahead of schedule and under budget, will improve - 7 7----!'-....4....._ :'''',1*,d�.1 — • '''',Lh ,V* � , ,,:.p . circulation and offer the community an alternative to driving. -. -� _'�, :„ .'_-:1-1_,_;',..:”. , , :i A - . ‘-,:-._. _ _:4-:- ..! .,:,-,.., 4,....-.„,..;::„, - .. i, :., ,.........43, This new road has sidewalks,shared bicycle lanes and light- - -',.-----7:;,..:. - ,A %, . y �, ^ tom ing, features that make it easier to leave your car at home. . ' .. ,1 =- i`,--r:..',.-. ',.- r .*. , . i-�~,- ., , Projects like these reaffirm the city's goals in sustainable i ii.,„' --r',.' r 1 MT� '. „ f ' . - . r management of its transportation network by aggressively - .., ." ' _ �.. =-=. -- ' T . 4', r.6/...— ' }� a�cY.u�;it., ,. "'.wpb'".K'� rArtlic4 7 t connecting our roads to provide alternative routes and to �": ,__ .,-_._.._. .. ::� 1.4. .. .1:-.... .. 7/:,,..., . better distribute traffic` APCTEalso provided d C I .. traffic.�c. provided CE! ser- �...� :.....r.. ..,�.,,�,�_.._........g vices during construction of this project. Some of the . ----'-4. construction management services provided for this „- `= project included: Weekly construction meeting/coordi- -. `',.. $ �` nation to monitor; Perform all shopdrawing proram _ ' ', -NIP , functions; Respond to request for information (BFI's); _ � , \ A. i Evaluate Request for changes to project schedules; Contract documents clarifications; Inspect all MOT op- . -. erations; and Review, track and maintain construction schedules. r KEY PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta, P.E. (Principal-in-Charge), Eithel Sierra, P.E. (Project Manger),Alejandro Leon, P.E. (Project Engineer), Roadway Design, Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeling, Permit- Eduardo Martinez, P.E. (Electrical Engineering),Arnelio ting' Utility Coordination, Lighting, Si nalization Signing and Alfonso, P.E. (Hydraulic Modeling), Lazaro Ferrero, P.E. (WaterPavement Markings, Construction Management,etc.Nelson Perez, P.E. (Construction Administration), Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 20 'i X -'''. 4.-...,...,,---3, ---.,.7.1e—_, 111Prilibi''''4, ' ,, , .:.-,4 , . .i . -_, - 4.1.1.,-: . 1 . ,..-,.- :: .: .: • - .:.,., . , . . 1.41.41-T , —'. . ProjectReference zi,,,-..! , .—_ _'- -- -- j �--.- _ _` A&P Consulting PROJ ECT NAME: 1-75 EXPRESS LANES SEGMENT C CLIENT NAME Florida Department of Transportation D-4 I-- Antonio Castro, P.E. Q o Phone No.:(954)448-2905 APCTE ROLE CEI Services 1-- L.1._ z0 ? email:antonio.castro@dot. COMPLETION DATE On-Going ° state.fl.us PROJECT LOCATION SR-93/1-75 ML System South of Miramar Parkway to South of Sheridan Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Design-Build project calls for the implementation of Express wxXs t ,.. �: 7174,, Lanes alongSR-93/I-75.This is one of five projects within this Dis- ii, , ? , % „.„:, :sic,`' ° f� °'41 �� `=� 1 trict Four corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade ''r x, Xa'� i'',�t 4� � �_� County to 1-595 in Broward County.The project calls for construct- '` � 'y ing within the existing 166-foot wide median a 4-lane divided tolled roadway (two 12-foot travel lanes in each direction) with 6-foot .,,•,a. paved inside shoulders and 12-foot(10 feet paved)outside shout- , ,, :‘,11 . s . AmiZIP.1 ders. The project also includes constructing the Pembroke Road Mr- . ' iiikoodo • Overpass Bridge within the limited access right-of-way and Bro- . , �a „,,,,,,,s4„, , , .„ , ward County will construct the approaches.The Miramar Parkway ‘,„„iiiii ,..., : ;;;;;,14!”,.-./-4,"-.7!„,.,;,--,,,,,,,ir Overpass Bridge and interchange will be reconstructed. pg -'� . -•• +fid: •.::., APCTE provided CEI services during construction of this _ ... „ T ': . project. Some of the construction management services pro- -... - rm s, , .7,111,k;” ,,....,,,,,_ -— :"...... .....,,,%.... vided for this project included:weekly construction meeting/ coordination to monitor; Perform all shop drawing program , ,- functions; Respond to request for information (BFI's); Evalu- .;;} ate Request for changes to project schedules,Contract docu A " ments clarifications; Inspect all MOT operations; and Review, ,,. track and maintain construction schedules. � �` °,,„ g KEY APCTE PERSONNEL ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES Antonio Acosta,P.E.(Principal-in-Charge),Nelson Perez,P.E. (Construction Administration), Mauricio Castillo,P.E.(Project Administrator),Evelio Hernandez(Senior Inspector),Jorge- Construction Engineering and Inspection services,Construc- tionManzo(Senior Bridge Inspector);Jason Perez(Senior Inspec- tor); Management,etc. Hemberth Salazar,P.E.(Senior Inspector) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 21 f' Willa 4, ' . .i-X -4 47.. :'.1.r.$4:4.. .5''''.r.;t--..," .4 . , ir _ 1 l >, '7►it �., • -,f*:.,fir. I 1 ia. i . „...4 . * . ,..."i -.Ir Experience & Qua .., , -... r - . _Ase• bk--2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Provide an organizational chart of all personnei and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members'qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education,experience,and any other pertinent information,shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. The key staff that the A&P Team has selected for this solicitation has significant proven experience to provide the requested services described on the Scope of Services,and all of the team members are available and ready to begin work immediately. Based upon our understanding of the major requirements of this solicitation, we have selected a team tailored to meet each aspect of this contract. In determining our team key staff, we look not only at the special technical capabilities of each individual, but also their current workload. A&P will utilize a staffing plan that implements effective coordination, timely response to the City of Miami Beach's needs, and adherence to schedule and budget, thereby ensuring the completion of a successful project. The team leader selected for this endeavor will be one of our principals, Mr.Carlos M.Gil-Mera, P.E.,C.G.C.,who will serve as our Project Manager. Mr. Gil-Mera will act as the only point of contact between APCTE, and the City of Miami Beach. Mr. Gil-Mera is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Florida. He has more than thirty(30) years of experience working on similar projects to the ones that will be part of this contract.As one of the Principal of A&P,Mr.Gil-Mera has managed numerous projects for governmental and private clients. Past work experience of the key professional that will be supporting Mr.Gil-Mera including a brief description of their professional background as it relates to their roles on this particular contract are discussed below: Erik Sibila, P.E. (A&P) - Project Administrator: Mr. Sibila has over 9 years of experience in major civil engineering projects as Project Design Engineer,General Contractor and CEI Project Administrator. He has worked on the production sets of construction plans for drainage, water mains, gravity sewer and force mains, and assisted in the estimating and permitting processes. Mr. Sibila has worked on projects for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Florida Department of Transportation. Mr. Sibila also has acquired excellent experience in the CEI of major transportation infrastructure projects including most recently the Norris Cut Tunnel Project for WASD and the SR-836 open Road Tolling Project for MDX as well as extensive experience with the MEI Contract in District VI. Mr.Sibila has outstanding oral and written skills and is a graduate of the FDOT Project Administrator Academy. Phillip Garcia, E.I. (A&P) - Senior Inspector: Mr. Garcia graduated from the University of Florida on December, 2011 with a Bachelors degree in Civil Engineering. He has gained a well rounded experience on his 6 years in the business working on Design-build projects for the City of Miami Beach as well as a Maintenance Contract Inspector for FDOT District VI.He has also acquired significant experience in the inspection of complex drainage structures and MOT. He is very familiar with FDOT policies and procedures for preparation of work orders and supplemental agreements for extra work. He also is highly proficient with computers and has excellent oral and written skills. Jorge Abela(A&P)-Senior Inspector:Mr.Abela has over 28 years of extensive experience in Transportation/Structural and related projects,including Airports,buildings and Civil Site Work,in which 3 years were with the Florida Department of Transportation's District Six Office. Mr. Abela's transportation/structural engineering experience includes project management, roadway design,site civil design,signing and pavement marking design, public involvement and signal design. Mr. Abela has been involved in numerous bridge/structural projects where he has developed special skills in the plans production area through the use of Microstation and specialized application software such as GEOPAK & REBAR, along with structural design and calculations of units. He is also skilled in computer applications for design of transportation related facilities. He has extensive experience in the use of AutoCAD, MicroStation and Geopak A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 22 - •I Mesw., r,1 _i •• f •� !!., .._ ;, �.7 :� ,'y4..,m., w , Iw. . a 0Experience & Qualifications..._- to develop complete sets of construction plans, which have included State Roads, Runways, Taxiways, Aprons and Parkings. Alex Milz(A&P)-Senior Inspector:Mr.Milz has been an integral part of the CEI team at APCTE for the past 5 years.He has acquired significant experience in inspection drilled shafts foundations and overall bridge foundation construction. He is also excellently qualified in utility coordination for construction of roadway infrastructure facilities including drainage and watermain and forcemain improvements. Juan Alfonso Medina, P.E. (A&P) - Project Administrator: For the last ten years, Mr. Medina has served as Project Administrator on some of the most complex projects in Miami-Dade County, including the $170 Million SR-836 Extension from NW 107th Ave., to NW 137th. Ave. Design-Build project for MDX and the$182 Million NW 25th Street Viaduct Projects(East and West Phases).Mr.Medina has an outstanding Maintenance of Traffic experience and training, and has excellent knowledge of FDOT policies and procedures,particularly those related with FDOT District VI. Maurizio Castillo,P.E.(A&P)-Project Administrator:Extensive knowledge of public transportation infrastructure at all levels;design,construction and closure of process. Highly experienced in Design-Build Projects,project management and CEI Program with wide-ranging expertise in bridge construction&inspection,surveying,roadway construction& inspection, utilities installation &relocation of electrical and mechanical systems, segment erection,concrete& steel structures and materials sampling and testing. Familiar with FDOT procedures,FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction,CEI operations, roadway and bridge design standards,and Design Codes. Excellent oral and written skills. Jans Rovira,P.E. (A&P)-Project Administrator:Mr.Rovira's has over seventeen years of engineering experience in the fields of Environmental,Civil Engineering,and Construction Management/CEI Services. His work includes serving as a Construction Resident Engineer, Construction Project Manager,water and wastewater engineering and permitting construction field inspection and supervision. He is also very familiar with construction scheduling,cost estimating, civil engineering design,Quality assurance/Quality control.His professional experience includes work for municipal and private sector clients. He has successfully completed projects for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Miami- Dade Transit, Miami-Dade Public Works Department, Miami-Dade County & Broward County Aviation Departments, FDOT,the City of Naples for Collier County,the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD),and the New York Department and Environmental Protection (NYDEP). Evelio Hernandez (A&P) - Project Administrator: Mr. Hernandez has 40 years of experience with the Florida Department of Transportation both in-house and as a Consultant,25 years in construction and 15 years in roadway de- sign. Specific areas of expertise include project administration, construction management, roadway design, bascule bridge and roadway construction inspection and surveying. While with the FDOT, Mr. Hernandez has held several positions ranging from Construction Project Manager, District Estimates Engineer, Final Plans and Contracts Engineer, Design Squad Leader,and Bridge and Roadway Inspector. On the following page you will find our proposed organizational chart as well as the key personnel resumes and current CTQP certifications. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 23 CC O V VI Zc`/ —.... ,.41,,,,,,y,,14',,.. Q Q W � W (1') v LL. — �`�'�<��of` � Cr) W k �,r Z ;1.it: W LLS Q t -- iicr L O a. U Q _ N cr alI— n > •� W ti ,I,'''',4:4.::,'''''„:,:,'"...:::11":"1:, tJ� d Q Q W.........Z tin Z W Z t; Q • U z W ce Z V LLj N H N O O U •v O v "{ ," W U 4-- �7 *;�" O Z ,........111.11011N jz i N CD (D Q 0 N Y r ���s Q :a • O Q /� vl a �t" ;,r t.z� 4 1.14„..,'•,, Q a " CC Uu- �, �. W 0 Z 06 LI) ,„{ �Q LLJ r, V' • Q U � Q CL W . - Z v p W L t Q W t.Li kr) .CL CO _M a. d. 0 O • ca _ — fQ Lii 0 L f6 co { V L (3 Q cin ' -a 1' I- 2 = 03u ._ s Z O t� •v dJ •o , 2 Z W � cI3 cv W W _ W cc _ W_ 2 LU W a N CZ G ---� _ W W L.L Z Z G V O = —� v Z L4I0 ' ca Ne VI f, _ ,. Q N O 03 Q.V U p O C a) cv n 73 Q V --) L co = C ca )W •a= Z Z. � t./'1 t3_ 025 0Ca 2a. C3 Z CO 0- Q 0- ca W 0 Le) d. ` C., o ci Q LL. ��CJ SCJ Q W �.� O Q Q d” Q 0 CD `�`� VI j ._.: o2S o W !-- ( � Q Q N — < LU c� `�' i V = Z CC O -0 W vs_ G , UCr. a LL.J R3_� - W = W �' fa Q� .L Ni u V i..,X' W N L •L Q .4,. W J C1 Z _ _ a CO = Q o N - Cu} 'a, Z .s c6 X O •Q L >. cv C o '�' 0 Q �' v — = O N O '`a to "-' Li a 0 _ --, > c/1 "I (°to =c o ...I L -,V U W LJLL. 43.) '._ 26 'E coCD Z Q =O 4— "M O va,- ,c ° 0 O 0 •— v G1. w g a 06 01, '=ct ., z 0 5 cif(-, w Q c.9 ¢ = � z di& ' ' -4:--.--:.. , . , W ' - - r - ' s ESUME • ,,,„„r . .1/4. �` - .. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp.ji P , s .,,,,,.r�Wi.V `.a .is. 1! Ili, 6iLER , . LGL Mr. Gil-Mera brings over 30 years of experience in the Design of Highway Facilities and Infrastructure Projects. He spent the first fifteen years of his career working for the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)District VIinternal desi n office on p p design the production of roadway plans including minor design and major reconstruction proj- ects.During the last two years of his career at FOOT he worked as District VI Roadway Design Project Manager where he was head of an Internal Design Team working on Industry Experience:30 Years a large number of milling and resurfacing and reconstruction projects.As one of the Office Location:Doral, FL. principals of A&P, Mr. Gil-Mera has designed and managed numerous Transportation Projects for Governmental and Private Clients. Mr. Gil-Mera is an active member of EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science-Civil the American Society of Civil Engineers. The Florida Engineering Society and the Engineering,April 1986 Cuban American Association of Civil Engineers. He is a 1986 graduate of Florida In- Florida International University, ternational University with a Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering. Miami Fl. KEY PROJECTS REGISTRATION: 1991, Florida Professional Engineer FDOT DISTRICT VI, N.W.36TH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, MIAMI,FLORIDA: No.43953 Client:FDOT DVI. Project Manager: Toghiani(305)470-5343.Be .Date-End Date: 1992, Florida Certified General Ali 9 12/2012—On-going. Role: Project Manager. Scope of Work:This contract included Contractor No.56647 two distinct projects. Project 425979-1-52-01 includes milling & resurfacing, median EXPERIENCE: , modifications,sidewalk,and ADA ramp construction along NW 36th Street.The limits Principal of this project go from about 120 ft. west of Lee Drive to just east of Coolidge Drive. December 2000—Present Project 418065-2-52-01 include major reconstruction including the replacement of the A&P Consulting TransportationN.W. 36th Street bascule bridge over the Miami Canal, as well as milling and resur- Engineers.QA engineer/Seniior facing, drainage, lighting, 9n►alizatior, and minor intersection sectio E modifications of NW Project Manager. 9 y lighting, y Project g 36th Street at N.W. South River Drive and NW North River Drive.This project entails Roadway Design Project replacing a functionally obsolete Hanover Bascule Bridge crossing the Miami Canal Manager 1 C-6 with two fixed concrete bridges. Jan. 1999—Nov.2000 FDOT-District VI, Miami a NW 87TH AVENUE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS AT SR-836, MIAMI, FLORIDA. Project Engineer Client: Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. Project Manager: Gil Portela, P.E.-MDX Oct. 1989-Dec. 1998 GEC Project Manager. Phone No.: (305)551-8100. Fax No.: (305)551-2800. Email: FDOT-District VI, Miami gportelal@hntb.com.Project Role:Sr.Signalization Project Engineer,Initial/Final Con- tract Value:$5.5 M. Initial/Final Construction Cost:N/A.Beg.Date-End Date: 10/2011- June 2015.Scope of Work-The SR-836/NW 87th Avenue Interchange reconstruction is the final piece necessary to complete the Section 5 Master Plan. The project will complete the system-to-system connections for the western portion of SR-836 con- necting to SR-826 and provide the ultimate capacity improvements along the SR-836 mainline. In addition the project will provide significant traffic operations and safety improvements for the interchange and the surrounding arterial network.The goal is to improve the access from the arterial network onto the expressway and thus relieving the arterial grid,in particular the intersection of NW 87th Avenue and NW 12th Street. Being able to accomplish this will be a win-win for all by reducing commuter travel times on SR-836 and improving operations on NW 87th Avenue and NW 12th Street. 1,— A,&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. s r.il ,i 316, i , „,,,,,,,,,,,,,' „,. ,R: . .- ,. tc..„....___,, . , .! n • 17 • } ? _• r� �� ,., .-m—.—..------.--.--,,,w wai1r�41ic���mhw�s� a ,++ '. _.__ .. ..... _... ......_._.,,..........w,.., .,.....,m..._«...r,.,...wa.r,me..�n ,.nc�ue�enc..camwa.crm.�¢ann.v^-a.�¢.maF^„r ap- �,&!\ ' __. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. ,,- 4---_,,._..,...kg.,. i fr.,.k 7 Y-.,:si, +, g i _ rl 3 ., f Lg a D i• i i L 1.f L t 3 '' LL.,, .....j../,•,... Improving interchange operations is also a key factor,which include providing ramp sequencing at the interchange,providing lane continuity and balance, and eliminating the weaving condition within the interchange. NW 14TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION, MIAMI, FLORIDA Client Name: FOOT District VI. Project Reference: Elsa Riverol, P.E. (305) 470-5105. Project Length: 0.6 miles. Project Role: Project Manager/Engineer of Record . Beg. Date-End Date:02/2002—10/2002. Scope of Work:Total reconstruction of NW 14th Street approx- imately 0.6 miles from NW 42nd Court to NW 34th Avenue.This project included the preparation of Roadway Plans, Drainage improve- ments,including a Pump Station,Signalization,Lighting and Signing and Pavement Markings and Intelligent Transportation System(I.T.S) Plans. MIC RENTAL CAR CENTER MIAMI, FLORIDA Client: FDOT District 6(Project reference: Carl Filler, P.E. 305-470-5145, carl.filler@dot.state.fl.us). Begin-End Date: 03/2000- 12/2004. Project Role: Senior Project Engineer. Scope of Work: Design and development of the Site Civil Construction Plan for the proposed Rental Car Facility.This 3.4 million square feet"rental car shopping mall”provided customers arriving through MIA convenient access to participating rental car companies. It features the first multilevel fueling system designed in the U.S.At full build-out,it had a total capacity of approximately 6,500 vehicles and included a Ready/Return garage, quick turnaround fuel and wash areas, and a customer service lobby. Initially,rental car buses that now circle the airport were replaced by a common shuttle.Later,when the MIC-MIA Connector opened and connected the RCC to the airport terminals, MIA curbside traffic was reduced by 30%. SW 8TH ST. INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS AT THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE; NEW CONSTRUCTION. Client Name: Florida Turnpike Enterprise. Project Reference: William F. Sloup, P.E. (407) 264-3080. Project Length:1.5 miles. Project Role:QA Engineer.Beg.Date-End Date:06/2005—10/2007.Scope of Work:Prepared Construction Documents(Plans and Specifications) for a new southbound HEFT exit ramp to westbound SW 8th Street.The proposed typical consisted of a single 15 foot lane ramp facility 'with 6 foot shoulder, 2 foot paved on east side and 4 foot paved on the west Side. The project included new roadway alignment, i�e'vv drainage, new lighting, modifications to the existing drainage system, and utility coordination. MIC-EARLINGTON HEIGHTS CONNECTOR Client: Miami—Dade Transit/URS Corp.(Carlos Garcia, P.E. 305-262-7466). Project Role:Senior Roadway Project Engineer.Provided Site Civil engineering for the Miami Intermodal Center—Earlington Heights Station. Scope of Work:The Miami Intermodal Center—Ear- lington Heights projects runs from the existing Earlington Heights Station locate next to SR112 and approximately east of NW 27th Avenue west to the new MIC Core Facility locate next to the Miami International Airport.The project included the site civil design,utility coordination, Maintenance of Traffic(including SR-112&NW 41st Street),detour plans for the MIC-Earlington(crossing),Signing and Pavement Marking (including SR-112 and NW 41st Street), signalization design,temporary signal,and substation design.Our site civil department, as part of the design team,were involved in monthly coordination meetings with Miami-Dade Transit Agency representatives,architects/engineers and system consultants. -MIC TERMINAL ACCESS ROADWAYS(MTAR) Client Name:FDOT District VI. Project Reference:Carl Filer,P.E.,(305)470-5137.Project Length:N/A.Project Role:Senior Signalization Project Engineer.Beg. Date-End Date:05/2002—06/2004.Scope of Work: Preparation of the construction plans set for this new system of roads providing access to the new Rental Car Center. The project included a new system of ramps to connect the Rental Car Center (RCC)with Le Jeune Road/NW 42nd Avenue Northbound and Southbound Ramps with Central Blvd./NW 21st Street Interchange.The project includes new roadway construction,two new bridges,new drainage system,two new signalized intersections,new lighting system, signing& pavement markings, landscape& irrigation,and utility coordination. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. ...__. , ..,,,,,, ,,.,: owr , . ,A;::....,::: ,,, _ ,i.. . .... a .,, ''.- 111 " ti 1 :- , ,.,,„ , „iirt.„... . ,- ___ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Hit'llWiri 1.:: A rrICTA Dr fi...„..„.1 NiOiHO v. ..COSTAI a LGC. Mr.Acosta brings over 31 years of experience in the Design of Highway Facilities. He spent the first fourteen years of his career working for the Florida Department of Trans- ' portation(FDOT)District VI internal design office on the production of roadway plans from minor design to reconstructionprojects. Duringthe last two years of his g major career at FDOT, he worked as District VI Roadway Design Project Manager where he was head of an Internal Design Team working on a large number of milling and resur- Industry Experience:31 yrs facing and reconstruction projects. He is a 1985 graduate of Florida International Uni- Office Location: Doral, FL versity with a Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering.He is currently a member of the Cuban-American Association of Civil Engineers(C-RACE) REGISTRATION: 1988, Florida Professional Engineer No.40845 KEY PROJECTS 1990, Florida Certified General NW 87TH AVENUE INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION AT SR-836, MIAMI, Contractor No.47411 FLORIDA. EDUCATION: Client: Miami-Dade Expressway Authority(Gil Portela, P.E. - Project Manager(305) Bachelors of Science-Civil 551-8100). Beg. Date-End Date: 10/2011 - On-Going (Post Design). Project Role: Engineering December 1985, project Manager/ Engineer of Record.The SR-836/NW 87th Avenue Interchange Florida International University, reconstruction is the final piece necessary to complete the SR-826/SR-836 (Section Miami, Fl. 5) Interchange Master Plan.The project will complete the system-to-system connec- EXPERIENCE: , tions for the western portion of SR-836 connecting to SR-826 and provide the ultimate President, Quality Control Manager capacity improvements along the SR-836 mainline. In addition the project will provide January 2000—Present significant traffic operations and safety improvements for the interchange and the sur- A&P Consulting roundingarterial network.The goal is to improve the access from the arterial network Transportation Engineers p g onto the expressway and thus relieving the arterial grid, in particular the intersection Roadway Design Project of NW 87th Avenue and NW 12th Street.The scope of services included the design Manager of the vertical and horizontal controls of SR 836 and all of it's ramps, Preliminary En- May 1999-Dec 1999 gineering Report, project schedule, analyze traffic data, geometric design, line-at- I.C.F.Kaiser-Miami grade, horizontal/vertical alignments,quantity take-off,cross sections typical section Roadway Design Project package, pedestrian and bicycle considerations, contruction of 7 new bridges, new Manager drainage features, new MDX lighting, maintenance of traffic, and modification of the January 1995-April 1999 existing ITS system. The design of the project also included earthwork and grading FDOT-District VI, Miami of several dry retention ponds. Some of the key project elements included geometric design, drainage, permitting, complex maintenance of traffic, interchange re-design, Project Engineer February1988-January 1995 # lighting, its,structural design. ry FDOT-District VI,Miami MIAMI INTERMODAL CENTER(MIC) Professional Engineer Trainee Client Name: FDOT District VI. Project Reference: Carl Filer, P.E. (305) 470-5137. February 1986-January 1988 Project Length: N/A. Project Role: Roadway and Infrastructure Task Manager. Beg. FDOT-District VI, Miami Date-End Date:05/1999—05/2015.Scope of Work: Mr.Acosta was in charge of su- pervising the development of the roadway, drainage and utility master plan for this $1.3 billion dollar project.In charge of supervising the development of the construction plans for all the Limiting Access Roadway Plans for the MIC-MIA Interchange, North- bound and Southbound Connector Distributor. Responsible for coordination with all different agencies having projects in the area like MDX, Miami Dade County Public Works, City of Miami, Miami International Airport etc. .r•,h..µ . .6___:_____.._._..._ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 0. ,-..-,,,, . ►� i.. . :, ‘ ,1,iii,,,,, . ...... .., _ _A.. .. . . A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. fk i i APITOrIO 1i 1 Li l ` R rte' 'r > '1. ) ��'s �e s r '����x r SR-997 I KROME AVENUE FROM US-1 TO AVOCADO DRIVE/SW 296TH STREET,MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA Client Name:FDOT District VI.Project Reference:Adriana Manzanares(305)470-5283.Project Length:3.78 miles.Project Role:QA/QC Manager. Beg. Date-End Date:08/2010—01/2013. Scope of Work:This project was part of the improvements identified in the Depart- ment's Krome Avenue Action Plans approved by the Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization in March, 1999. This portion of Krome Avenue isa north-south two-lane roadway that extends approximately 3.78 miles from US-1 to Avocado Drive,running through the center of Florida City and the City of Homestead in southern Miami-Dade County.The corridor land use is primarily industrial in the Florida City section(S.W. 352nd St to S.W.328th Street/Lucy Street)and commercial in the City of Homestead section(S.W. 328th Street/Lucy Street to S.W. 296th Street/Avocado Drive). Project included the preparation of Construction Documents (plans and specifications) for the 3.78 mile segment of this urban corridor,including signing&pavement markings,upgrading seven signalized intersections from span- wire to mast-arm, of lighting, implementation of four traffic safety studies, implementation of Access Management and compliance with ADA requirements, Landscaping& Irrigation within the City of Homestead Florida. SW 8TH ST. INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS AT THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE; NEW CONSTRUCTION. Client Name: Florida Turnpike Enterprise. Project Reference: William F. Sloup, P.E. (407) 264-3080. Project Length:1.5 miles. Project Role: Project Manager. Beg. Date- End Date: 06/2005—10/2007. Scope of Work: Prepared Construction Documents(Plans and Specifications)for a new southbound HEFT exit ramp to westbound SW 8th Street.The proposed typical consisted of a single 15 foot lane ramp facility with 6 foot shoulder,2 foot paved on east side and 4 foot paved on the west side.The project included new roadway alignment, new drainage, new lighting,modifications to the existing drainage system,and utility coordination. SR-112 TOLL PLAZA CONVERSION Client Name: Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. Project Reference: Gil Portela, P.E. (305) 551-8100. Project Length: 1.5 miles. Project Role: QA/QC Manager. Beg. Date-End Date:07/2005—05/2006. Scope of Work: Project consisted of three primary elements: Roadway,Toll Plaza,and Employee Parking area.The roadway portion con- sisted of expanding the merging and diverging areas,correcting roadway cross slope,drainage,signing&pavement markings,maintenance of traffic, roadway lighting, and utility coordination.The toll plaza portion consisted of the conversion of two dedicated SunPass lanes to express SunPass lanes, removal of an automatic coin machine lane, and the conversion of a automatic coin machine lane to a manual booth lane. The existing high canopy was replaced with a gantry over the proposed express SunPass lanes. The existing employee parking was reconfigured as part of the project. MIC TERMINAL ACCESS ROADWAYS(MTAR) Client Name: FDOT District VI. Project Reference: Carl Filer, P.E., (305)470-5137. Project Length: N/A. Project Role: Project Manager. Beg.Date-End Date:05/2002—06/2004.Scope of Work:Preparation of the construction plans set for this new system of roads providing access to the new Rental Car Center. The project included a new system of ramps to connect the Rental Car Center(RCC) with Le Jeune Road/NW 42nd Avenue Northbound and Southbound Ramps with Central Blvd./NW 21st Street Interchange.The project scope included new roadway construction,two new bridges,new drainage system,two new signalized intersections,new lighting system,signing &pavement markings,landscape&irrigation,and utility coordination. NW 14TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION, MIAMI, FLORIDA Client Name: FDOT District VI. Project Reference: Elsa Riverol, P.E. (305) 470-5105. Project Length: 0.6 miles. Project Role: QA/QC Manager. Beg.Date-End Date:02/2002—10/2002. Scope of Work:Total reconstruction of NW 14th Street approximately 0.6 miles from NW 42nd Court to NW 34th Avenue.This project included the preparation of Roadway Plans,Drainage improvements,including a Pump Station, Signalization, Lighting and Signing and Pavement Markings and Intelligent Transportation System(I.T.S) Plans. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 4Ntrir . 2 J t),,, I,,tc.„ . , , , _. .,, -,,..,..,- , . -__-14 -; -,,..- ...— . 4,..... : ... . k is ;.: A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Aii NELSON V, PEREZ RE. liTh Mr. Perez has over 36 years of experience in construction engineering and r res management of major transportation projects including rapid transit, urban and rural roadway improvements, complex bridge projects and movable bridges. He has Vi:.: considerable experience(over 21 years)as a Construction Resident Engineer having led CEI efforts in FDOT Districts IV, VI, and Florida's Turnpike and MDX. In addition Industry Experience: 36 years. to his construction experience, he has managed complex maintenance of traffic Office Location: Doral, Fl. projects, and has held positions in quality control, traffic engineering, concrete pavement design and transportation planning. REGISTRATION: 2012, FL P.E. No. 32025 Georgia;Alabama; Puerto Rico NW 25 STREET SR-826 TO EAST OF NW 89TH COURT AND CONTINUATION OF FL General Contractor CGC049696 THE VIADUCT FROM EAST OF SR-826 TO NW 82ND AVENUE(WEST SEGMENT) (March 2012—On-Going) Role: Senior Project Engineer. Supervise and manage all EDUCATION: roadway/MOT project activities, including the supervision of the inspectors group. Masters in Civil/Transportation Engineering, 1978. Check and verify field documentation of daily construction activities, monitor the CEI Georgia Institute of Technology personnel and the relationship with the QC group and Contractor. Responsible for monthly payment estimates, work orders, laboratory test results, invoices, material Bachelor of Science in Civil certifications, final "as built" plan, and all necessary documentation to complete the Engineering, 1976. l Georgia Institute of Technology project's final acceptance. The construction of this project consists of the widening and reconstruction of NW 25th Street, widening the ramps to and from SR 826and WORK HISTORY: the construction of a 0.6 mile viaduct from NW 82nd Ave to SR 826 constructed over Project Engineer/Project Manager- the westbound lanes of NW 25th Street. The viaduct is constructed of prestressed APCTE:8/2005 to present Metric Engineering:4/1997—8/2005 concrete pile foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box"straddle bent cap" is then set between the columns to accommodate two (2) lanes of traffic, 13 spans of steel I-beam girders are erected and a 8.5"deck slab constructed. The construction of the remainder of the project include an elliptical 24' X 16' culvert i installation along the existing canal with a length of 2900 LF, MSE walls, steel sheet pile bulkhead walls, pile/panel retaining wall, roadway lighting, traffic signalization, overhead sign structures,drainage and asphalt paving. NW 25 STREET FROM SR-826 TO EAST OF NW 68 AVENUE AND VIADUCT i FROM EAST OF SR-826 TO NW 22 STREET(EAST SEGMENT) (Sept 2007—July 2011) Role: Senior Project Engineer. The Scope of this project entailed the widening and reconstruction of NW 25th St,the new construction of NW 68th Ave from NW 22nd St.to NW 25th St.,widening the ramps to and from SR 826 i and the construction of a viaduct from NW 22nd St. to SR 826 constructed over the westbound lanes of NW 25th St.Two(2)bridges are being constructed in this project using the same type of substructure and superstructure.Served as the Senior Project Engineer and supervised all of the inspectors and was responsible for the overall inspection of the roadway!bridge construction.Also was responsible for making sure • A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. A7.7 uwEii "41 1111 • MINN R ti j �� . A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. that all of the sampling and tracking of all construction materials,asphalt,concrete,earthwork and all other construction materials involved in this roadway/bridge project. Client/Contact name/Phone:FDOT Dist. 06/Dari Vorce/305-499-2392 SR-836 EXTENSIONS FROM NW 107 AVE TO NW 137 AVE AND 137 AVE FROM SW 8 STREETS TO NW 12 STREETS MDX#83605. (September 2004 — May 2007) Role: Senior Project Engineer. Project description: Responsible for monthly and final estimates, work orders, laboratory test results, invoices, material certifications, final "as built" plan, and all necessary documentation to complete the project's final acceptance. Supervised and managed all the activities of the project, all the inspectors of our group, and maintained the relationship with the QC group and Contractor. This project, which was the largest design-build project to be awarded in the State of Florida, included the construction of eight new bridge structures,extensive drainage areas with landscape enhancements as well as the construction of the six-lane 137th Avenue and a new bridge at SW 8th Street.The project's design-build phase began in April 2004 and was completed on June 2007.Supervised all inspections,sampling and testing of all materials related with the construction of the Roadway and the Bridges, including but not limited to Clearing & Grubbing, Embankment, MSE wall, Lake excavations, Marine mattress, MOT issues,drainage improvements, ITS installation, ITS gantry construction,Asphalt pavement,Signing and Pavement markings and all the bridge related activities.Client I Contact name/Phone: MDX/Juan Toledo, PE./305-637-3277 HALLANDALE BEACH BLVD. BROWARD COUNTY FOR DISTRICT IV. (June 1998— March 2003) Role: Senior Project Engineer. Project description: Replacement for this twin bascule bridge replacement project with a construction cost of over$60 million.The contract involved the twin two-span three-lane bascule bridge replacement with cast-in-place box girder approach spans and a cast-in-place box girder left turn flyover from NB SR-Al A to WB SR-858/Hallandale Beach Blvd. FDOT. Bridge components included a fly over from A-1-A to Hallandale Beach Blvd.with 48"Drilled Shafts that were cast in place Post-tensioned with a total length of 765'with 4 spans.Project also included the bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway which had Florida concrete beam,AASHTO beams and a bascule span.Client/Contact name/Phone: FDOT Dist 4/Pete Nissen 954-325-8235 LAS OLAS BLVD. BROWARD COUNTY FOR DISTRICT IV. (February 1997—January 1998) Role: Senior Project Engineer. Project description:Las Olas Bascule Bridge Rehabilitation Project over the Intracoastal Waterway Corporate Manager This superstructure rehabilitation project of the Bascule Span including replacement of steel main girders,diaphragms,new handrail,new electrical refurbishing and Control House Improvements.Bridge components included AASHTO beams and a bascule span with a total project length of 1,100'with 15 spans. I-95/SR 836.INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 1-95 FROM SR 836 TO SR 112.IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 87270-3415/3475/3508 (September 1991 —June 1994) Role:Senior Project Engineer. Project description:The work consisted of widening and reconstruction of 1.6 miles of I-95, 2 ramps at the I-95ISR836 Interchange and construction of 3 new ramps within the interchange including construction of the Steel Braided Connector to facilitate NB 1-95 traffic to access SR 112/1-95 exit ramps and avoid weaving with NB On-Ramp traffic from SR 395.The majority of the roadway improvements on 1-95 and the new ramps construction of new 9"thick concrete pavement. It also involved construction/installation of over 20000 LF of pre-stressed concrete beams, 4800 ft of drilled shafts and 34200 LF of pre- stressed concrete piling.The work also involved extensive night operations and daily coordination of maintenance of traffic for 3 different working on the I-95/S R836 and I-95/S R 112 Interchanges A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. --atki -3 ,, ::..':, ' .- -- A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. fi, DI £t a� r, , U L. t i 1 Karla Gil has eight years of progressive experience in office administration in the con- s., ,A r - suiting engineering and construction engineering and inspection related field. Her '-' diver-sified experience includes assistance with administrative and office support ac- W_ --- _ - =� tivities for multiple supervisors (roadway, water resources, structural, lighting, traffic engineering departments), as well as department managers in keeping projects on Industry Experience:8 years schedule;relievesrinci als of the firm of various administrative functions. Office Location:Doral, Florida p p i EDUCATION: KEY PROJECTS: August 2006-May 2011: Bachelor's Degree, Barry University, Miami 10/14 TO PRESENT: DESIGN-BUILD MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY Shores, FL: (MDX)ORT CONVERSION PROJECT •Criminology Major;Business Minor •Activities: Ms.Gil currentlyserves as Administrative Assistant for this $12.6 Million in SR-836. Phi Sigma Sigma Including: g g MDX is in the process to transitioning all corridors to ORT.The goal of this project is Rho Gamma-May 2010-August 2010 to provide the infrastructure necessary to convert the SR-836 between NW 137th Av- Greek Week Chair 2011 enue and SR-826 to an Open Road Facillity.The project includes the construc-tion of 'Judicial Board 2009-2011 Skills: 5 new toll gantry structures and modification to three currently existing in the SR-836 Bilingual, Fluent in both English and corridor. Ms.Gil handles all clerical duties including organizing all project files, typing Spanish minutes of project meetings,assisting project administrator in preparation of final es- timate for the project and other duties Contact Name: David Chang(305)265-5492. Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint,Outlook,Visio, Pub- lisher Internet and Public Databases 06/14 TO 10/14: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ASSISTANT Ms.Gil currently handles administrative and office support activities for multiple super- visors(roadway,water resources,structural,lighting,traffic engineering departments). Assists department managers in keeping projects on schedule;Relieves principals of the firm of various administrative functions;Assists the accounting department in the • preparation of invoices for the transportation division;Composes correspondence/con- tracts/reports for managers and principals of the company; Prepares agenda items, arrange meeting facilities and act as recording secretary by preparing action minutes for department managers and principals;Arranges travel,itinerary and expense reports after trips to attend design conferences and business meetings for employees and supervisors of the transportation division and principals of the firm;As required,train and supervise part-time secretarial or clerical staff;Perform daily office functions and other related work such as:assist project managers in the preparation of technical re- ports to meet the needs of the company; pick up office mail; answer telephone calls, L A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Itillr& .4... ,: , :*:;::' —:::: .1661. A - - mut „..ailie._ ,,,, , -"-'r,�_ .:;r, °.4 7- A &P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. KAR:U r GE2/2 i °a.3,s.,.. arrange schedules for de-liveries;filing and maintaining records. 12/11 TO 06/14 CRIME ANALYST TECHNICIAN Ms.Gil specialized in analyzing,organizing and presenting crime data and statistics.She performed related duties as required by Information Technology(IT.)Commander to Karla Gil has eight years of progressive experience in office administration in the con-suiting engineering and construction engineering and inspection related field. Her diver-sified experience includes assistance with administrative and office support activities for multiple supervisors(roadway,water resources, structural,lighting, traffic engineering departments),as well as de- partment managers in keeping projects on schedule; relieves principals of the firm of various administrative functions. _. =T . ._, -----c__ . _ . . &P Consulting g Transp rtation Engineers,Corp. . __. ....--„ n , „r47I, 0 —,,..: - .."., ,, _ ,.„,, , N.:.„,,, : :r,,;,.. � ' *$ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. .'" '�'_�Wit"'+"9 . . ' /....:....,v-2. .' ''• • Ai& — c,.. ..) ,{ filir-1 ,,„„i rRIK ciBILA °E "Src r G C RE., Mr.Sibila has over 9 years of experience in major civil engineering projects as Project Design Engineer and General Contractor.He received his Bachelor of Science Degree in 2008 with Summa Cum Laude and class Valedictorian honors. He has worked on the production sets of construction plans for drainage, water mains,gravity sewer and . force mains, and assisted in the estimating and permitting processes. Mr. Sibila has worked on projects for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department,Florida Department Industry Experience:9 yrs of Transportation.Mr.Sibila also has acquired excellent experience in the CEI of major Office Location: Doral, Florida transportation infrastructure projects including most recentlly the Norris Cut Tunnel Project for WASD and the SR-836 open Road Tolling Project for MDX. Mr. Sibila has EDUCATION: outstanding oral and written skills and is a graduate of the FDOT Project Administrator Master of Science Civil I Water Academy. Resources Engineering,2011 FL International University Miami, FL KEY PROJECTS Bachelor of Science Civil NW 87TH AVENUE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS AT SR-836, MIAMi, Engineering,2008 Architectural FLORIDA. Engineering,2008 Summa Cum Client: Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. Project Manager: Gil Portela, P.E., Phone Laude University of Miami Coral No.:(305)551-8100.Fax No.:(305)551-2800.Email:gportelal@hntb.com.Initial/Final Gables, Florida Contract Value:$5.5 M. Initial/Final Construction Cost: N/A. Beg. Date-End Date: 10/2011- On-Going. Role: Utility Coordinator.Scope of Work: The SR-836/NW 87th REGISTRATION: Avenue Interchange reconstruction is the final piece necessary to complete the Section 2012, FL P.E. No.74663 5 Master Plan. The project will complete the system to system connections for the 2004, FL General Contractor western portion of SR-836 connecting to SR-826 and provide the ultimate capacity CGC1508340 improvements along the SR-836 mainline. In addition the project will provide signifi- 2013, FL Surveyor-in-Training cant traffic operations and safety improvements for the interchange and the surround- ing arterial network.The goal is to improve the access from the arterial network onto QUALIFICATIONS: the expressway and thus relieving the arterial grid,in particular the intersection of NW Drilled Shaft 87th Avenue and NW 12th Street.Being able to accomplish this will be a win-win forall ACI Concrete Field Inspector by reducing commuter travel times on SR-836 and improving operations on NW 87th Concrete Field Inspector Avenue and NW 12th Street. Specifications Level I Asphalt Roadway Level I DESIGN-BUILD OF CENTRAL BOULEVARD Asphalt Roadway Level II Client Name: MDX/ FDOT, District 6. Project Reference: Ariel Millan, PE. Contact Earthwork Construction Inspection Number: (305) 670-2350. Prime Consultant: BCC Engineering. Project Role: Utility Level I Coordinator/Signal Project Engineer. Beg. Date-End Date: 6/2010—On-going. Con- Earthwork Construction inspection tract Amount: $600,000. Project Scope: Responsible for coordinating with all Utility Level II Agency Owners with existing facilities within the project limits identifying and avoiding Final Estimates Level I potential conflict with proposed roadway work. Survey and field verify all encountered Final Estimates Level II potential utility conflict. Responsible for ensuring that MDX, MDAD and FDOT Stan- QC Manager dardsolicies and procedures, and design and construction criteria are followed for FDEP Stormwater Erosion Control p g Ins ector each utility coordination/relocation.Coordinated with FPL to identify Service Points for p ITS, Signal, Lighting and Landscape Lighting. Responsible for the Design and Plans Advanced Maintenance of Traffic Preparation for Several Proposed Signalization along the Project Limits.IMSA Traffic Signal Inspector SSPC Bridge Coatin Inspector FDOT Construction PA Academy 02/2015 TO PRESENT. MDX SR-836 INFRASTRUCTURE MOFIFICATIONS FOR OPEN ROAD TOLLING(ORT)Mr. Sibila currently serves as Assistant Project Admin- istr atoriCSS for this $12.6 Million Design-Build Miami-Dade Expressway Authority i ti.._, A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 410, r . A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. EP'11 SIBII A PC l'i4SrF r (MDX)ORT convertion project in SR-836. MDX is in the process to transitioning all corridors to ORT.The goal of this project is to provide the infrastructure necessary to convert the SR-836 between NW 137th Avenue and SR-826 to an Open Road Facillity.The project includes the construction of 5 new toll gantry structures and modification to three currently existing in the SR-836 corridor. Mr. Sibila is in charge of overseeing construction of a new exit ramp from SR-836 west bound to access the FDOT District VI Office which is also part of this contract. Contact Name: David Chang (305)265-5492. 08/2014 TO PRESENT. DB12-WASD-01 NORRIS CUT UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECT—MD WASD Role: Project Engineer/ Project Administrator. Project involves the replacement of the existing 54" force main underneath Norris Cut between Fisher Island and the Central District Wastewater Treatment Plant(CDWWTP),on Virginia Key,with a new 60"force main to be constructed via segmental tunnel trenchless technology, and open cut trenching method. .A new 8"force main will be constructed from Pump Station 170,on Fisher Island,connecting to the new 60"force main near the tunnel receiving shaft via horizontal directional drilling (HDD). Role as Project Engineer involves overseeing all construction activities at Launch Shaft (Virginia Key), Retrieval Shaft(Fisher Island), and Precast Segment Yard (Medley); managing inspection and verification testing activities; reviewing work package submittals for compliance with the Permit Documents,Design-Build criteria,and MD WASD's Standard Specifications and Design Details;responding to RFIs; hosting coordination meetings with MD WASD, Contractor, Utility Agencies, and stakeholders; hosting monthly pay estimate meetings; reviewing schedule; and tracking permits.Contact Name: Miguel Pichardo,(786)268-5170. 11/2012-08/2014. FDOT MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (MEI)CONTRACT Client: FDOT District VI. Scope of Work:As FDOT In-House Permit Senior Inspector, Mr.Sibila manages over 150 active permits in the Downtown Miami and Coral Gables area. Scope of work includes review of permit applications and entry of comments into the FDOT Electronic Review Comments(ERC)System,review of lane closure requests through the FDOT Lane Closure Information System(LCIS), hosting field meetings, and daily inspections of all working permits to verify compliance with the permit conditions, the Utility Accommodations Manual (UAM),and the FDOT Design Standards and Standard Indexes. Types of permits inspected include general, utility, drainage,access,landscape, banner,and film permits. (Contact: George de La Noval,305-640-7246) 03/2012-05/2015.30-INCH DUCTILE IRON FORCE MAIN ALONG HARDING AVENUE, FROM 69TH STREET TO 73RD Ktt Client: City of Miami Beach. Scope of Work:This project involves the extension of a 30"Ductile Iron Force Main along Harding Avenue, from 69th Street to 73rd Street, in Miami Beach, Florida.As Project Engineer, Mr. Sibila worked on all aspects of this project, including utility coordination, preparation of plans and technical specifications for the proposed 30-inch Force Main, review of shop drawings for compliance with City of Miami Beach Standards,and acquiring permits from FDOT and M-D.Served as Resident Project Representative for the construction of this pipeline. Daily activities included inspection and documentation of construction activities for safety and compliance with plans and specifications, preparation of daily reports, performing density tests, recording results of pressure testing, public involvement. Mr. Sibila was responsible for recording all pipeline elevations and vertical and horizontal clearances and for the drafting of the pipeline as-built drawings for permit closeout. Contact Name:Jose Rivas,(786)295-7199. 06/2010-PRESENT.GOVERNMENT CUT UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECTS Client:Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department.Scope of Work:This Design-Build project involves the replacement of a 20-inch Water Main via horizontal directional drilling beneath Fisherman's Channel and the upsizing of an existing 54-inch Force Main under Government Cut with a 60-inch carrier pipeline and a 74-inch steel casing using a two-path microtunneling method. Both existing pipelines must be lowered for the future Federal Navigational Dredging Project. Mr. Sibila is in charge of reviewing the plans, specifications, and shop drawings for each phase(70%, 100%, Issued for Construction)of each of the nineteen(19)work package submittals for this project.Also serves as the permit coordinator, and is in charge of all permitting with USACE, FDEP, M-D PERA, M-D Building Department, Port of Miami, and Fisher Island. Field responsibilities include inspection of the materials, testing, and sequence of construction for the launch A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 1 El) �" .. • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification P Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE S14020086 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 5/25/2017 S14020086 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 5/25/2017 S14020086 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 5/19/2017 S14020086 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 5/16/2017 S14020086 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 5/23/2017 S14020086 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 5/30/2017 S14020086 Management Final Estimates-Level 2 3/27/2020 S14020086 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 11/4)111,,: • • norm: a RESUlin , ,_ :» „ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. � r -11 For the last ten years, Mr.Medina has served as Project Administrator on some of the 11L4t- most complex projects in Miami-Dade County, including the $170 Million SR-836 Extension from NW 107th Ave., to NW 137th.Ave. Design-Build project for MDX and the$182 Million NW 25th Street Viaduct Projects(East and West Phases).Mr.Medina has an outstanding Maintenance of Traffic experience and training,and has excellent knowledge of FDOT policies and procedures, particularly those related with FDOT Industry Experience:28 years. District VI. Office Location: Doral, FL PROJECT EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: Bachelors of Science Degree in Civil 03/2012 TO PRESENT. NW 25TH ST. FROM SR 826 TO NW 89TH COURT / Engineering, ISPJAE, Havana VIADUCT WEST PHASE(FDOT FIN:251185-1-52-01 /405665-1-52-01) University, 1979-1985. Client/Contact name/Phone: FDOT District 06/Andres Berisiartu, P.E. /(305) 525- 4976.Role on Project:Project Administrator:Supervise and manage all roadway/MOT REGISTRATION: project activities, including the supervision of the inspectors group. Check and verify Florida Professional Engineer field documentation of daily construction activities, monitor the CEi personnel and the P.E. No.:73236 relationship with the QC group and Contractor. Responsible for monthly payment estimates, work orders, laboratory test results, invoices, material certifications, final CERTIFICATIONS: "as built" plan, and all necessary documentation to complete the project's final TIN No: M 354 420 62 059 0 acceptance. The construction of this project consists of the widening and Florida Storm Water Erosion reconstruction of NW 25th Street, widening the ramps to and from SR 826 and the &Sedimentation Control Inspector construction of a 0.6 mile viaduct from NW 82nd Ave to SR 826 constructed over the PTI Post-Tensioning Inspector westbound lanes of NW 25th Street.The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete SSPC Bridge Coating Inspector Level I pile foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box"straddle bent ACi Concrete Transportation inspector cap" is then set between the columns to accommodate two (2) lanes of traffic, 13 ACI Concrete Field Technician Level I I spans of steel I beam girders are erected and a 8.5" deck slab constructed. The CTQP Concrete Field Technician construction of the remainder of the project include an elliptical 24' X 16' culvert Drilled Shaft Construction installation along the existing canal with a length of 2900 LF, MSE walls,steel sheet Pile Driving Construction pile bulkhead walls, pile/panel retaining wall, roadway lighting, traffic signalization, Earthwork Construction Level I overhead sign structures,drainage and asphalt paving.Estimated Construction Cost: Earthwork Construction Level II $58,500,000.00. Asphalt Paving Technician Level I Asphalt Paving Technician Level II 08/2007-09/2011.NW 25TH ST.FROM SR 826 TO NW 67TH AVE/VIADUCT FROM Final Estimates Level I EAST OF SR 826 TO NW 22ND STREET(FDOT FIN: 251185-2-52-01 /405665-3- Final Estimates Level II 52-01) Florida Advanced MOT Client/Contact name/Phone: FDOT District 06/Andres Berisiartu, P.E. / (305) 525- IMSA Level 1 4976. Role on Project: Project Administrator: Supervised and managed all FDOT QC Manager roadway/MOT project activities, including the supervision of the inspectors group. FDOT MSE Walls Course Inspection Checked and verified field documentation of dailyconstruction activities, monitored p Troxler Nuclear Gauge Safety Training the personal and the relationship with the QC group and Contractor. Responsible for Clean Room Design Course monthly payment estimates, work orders, laboratory test results, invoices, material (GLAXO Smith Kline, Madrid,Spain) certifications, final "as built" plan, and all necessary documentation to complete the Traffic Engineering Course project's final acceptance.The construction of this project consisted of the widening (Magdeburg, Germany) and reconstruction of NW 25th St, the new construction of NW 68th Ave from NW 22nd St.to NW 25th St.,wiriening the ramps to and from SR R26 and the construction A&P C:onsultingTransportation Engineers,Corp. +mac -__ — — A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. :rikicp of a viaduct from NW 22nd St.to SR 826 constructed over the westbound lanes of NW 25th St.The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete pile foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box "straddle bent cap" is then set between the columns to accommodate two(2) lanes of traffic, 26 spans of steel I beam girders are erected and a 8.5"deck slab constructed.The overall length of the structure is 4,170 LF with the longest span at 220 ft. The construction of the remainder of the project included MSE walls, steel sheet pile bulkhead walls,cast-in-place retaining wall,roadway lighting,traffic signalization,overhead sign structures,drainage and asphalt paving. Estimated Construction Cost: $124,000,000.00.This project finished 100 days ahead of schedule and won the 2012 FTBA best in construction award in the category of"Major Bridge". 09/2004-07/2007.SR 836 EXTENSION FROM NW 107 AVE TO NW 137 AVE AND 137 AVE FROM SW 8 STREET TO NW 12 STREET (MDX 83605 1662446) Client/Contact Name/Phone:MDX/Juan Toledo,P.E./(305)637-3277. Role on Project:Project Administrator.Responsible for monthly and final estimates, work orders, laboratory test results, invoices, material certifications, final "as built" plan, and all necessary documentation to complete the project's final acceptance..Supervised and managed all the activities of the project, all the inspectors of our group, and maintained the relationship with the QC group and Contractor.This project,which was the largest design-build project to be awarded in the State of Florida, included the construction of eight new bridge structures, extensive drainage areas with landscape enhancements as well as the construction of the six-lane 137th Avenue and a new bridge at SW 8th Street. The project's design-build phase began in April 2004 and was completed on June 2007. Supervised all inspections, sampling and testing of all materials related with the construction of the Roadway and the Bridges, including but no limited to Clearing & Grubbing, Embankment, MSE wall, Lake excavations, Marine mattress,MOT issues,drainage improvements, ITS installation, ITS gantry construction,Asphalt pavement,Signing and Pavement markings and all the bridge related activities. Estimate Construction Cost:$ 175,000,000.00. Duration: 1270 days. 12/2003-07/2004.SR 112,WEST BOUND OFF RAMP TO OKEECHOBEE ROAD (MDX 112-004)Client/Contact Name/Phone:MDX/Juan Toledo,P.E./(305)637-3277.Role on Project:Senior Inspector.Responsible for inspecting and documenting the contractor's daily activities,on-site materials sampling and testing,laboratory test results,documentation of quantities,material certifications and for all the inspectors of our group,field documentation of daily construction activities,and maintained the relationship with the QC group related to the reconstruction of the new off ramp to Okeechobee Road with MSE wall,and the widening of the west Bound of SR-112, including the widening of both sides of the bridges(NW 37Ave and NW 37 Place). Estimate Construction Cost: $ 18,000,000.00 .Duration:600 days. 07/2002-12/2002. FLORIDA TURNPIKE FROM M.P. 55.7 TO M.P.63.9 Role on Project:Roadway Inspector.Supervised all asphalt paving activities related to the milling and resurfacing of the Florida's Turnpike in Broward County, from M.P.55.7 to M.P.63.9,and the widening of the on and off ramps of the Turnpike at Commercial Blvd and Sunrise Blvd.Responsibilities also included quality control,quality assurance and review of shop drawings.Also supervised and reviewed monthly project invoices and checked engineering computations, inspected construction work and conducted field tests. Estimate Construction Cost: $6,500,000.00. Duration: 790 days. 02/2001-07/2002. DISTRICT WIDE ADA IMPROVEMENTS,DADE/MONROE COUNTIES (FDOT FIN:409323-1-12-01).Client/Contact Name/Phone:FDOT 6/Rene Rodriguez/305-377-5906.Role on Project:Assistant Project Manager. In charge of a team of technicians responsible for the collection of data related to compliance of existing roadways with current American with Disabilities Act accessibility guidelines,for Miami Dade County and Monroe County. Surveyed and identified deficiencies on all State Roads and ensure the compliance with all applicable FDOT Standards including audible pedestrian signals,accessible routes, cross slopes,transitions dimension and prepared a schedule to identify and resolve any ADA deficiencies and complaints received by the FDOT. Estimate Construction Cost:$ 1,500,000.00. Duration:700 days. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. • * • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE M35442062 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 I 8/18/2020 M35442062 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 8/18/2020 M35442062 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 5/16/2017 M35442062 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 5/16/2017 M35442062 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 7/13/2017 M35442062 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 115/3/2018 M35442062 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 4/25/2020 M35442062 Geotech s Pile Driving Inspection 13/4/2020 M35442062 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 11/11/2021 M35442062 Management ` Final Estimates-Level 2 11/11/2021 M35442062 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire M35442062 Structures Qualified Post-Tensioning Technician-Level 1 :13/27/2019 Back 134215 07:kit,. n-' 'ki'7,17,7, agrak , !, ‘-:,-.,,:-- __ Iri,r ...- ‘i -:.,,,,.,.;:-: *4. 1 I , .- . r., ., • , - . , ... ___. __ -. ,t t' ' A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 1 'k ' ''' !Q 1( p r ,... , 1, clii ' '1 F 11 Extensive knowledge of public transportation infrastructure at all levels; design, _ construction and closure of process. Highly experienced in Design-Build Projects, project management and CEI Program with wide-ranging expertise in bridge construction & inspection, surveying, roadway construction & inspection, utilities p installation & relocation of electrical and mechanical ,systems, segment erection, Y concrete&steel structures and materials sampling and testing. Familiar with FDOT Industry Experience: 13 years procedures, FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, CEI Office Location: Doral, Florida operations, roadway and bridge design standards, and Design Codes. Excellent oral and written skills. EDUCATION: Florida International University, KEY PROJECTS I A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. Master of Science, Construction Management. JUNE 2014—PRESENT PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR Universidad Javeriana, Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering. FDOT D4 - FM #421707-4; 1-75 EXPRESS LANES SEGMENT C, FROM SOUTH OF MIRAMAR PKWY. TO SOUTH OF SHERIDAN ST. (3.7 miles), BROWARD PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: COUNTY Florida Professional Engineer No.: Started as a senior bridge inspector and was then promoted to bridge project 71662 administrator on January2016 for this 1-75 Segment C Design-Build project. This 9 9 project consist of the construction of express lanes(2 northbound and 2 southbound) QUALIFICATIONS: along the median area of 1-75,including de-mucking all areas to cap rock,two(2)new TIN No.:C234-540-71-161-0 bridges at the Miramar Parkway interchange and Pembroke Road overpass, 8,700 FDOT Project Administrator LF of ground mounted sound walls,major drainage,pond excavation for new retention n r i n Co st uct o Academy basins and utilizing the excavated material for embankment on the project. D-B Cost: FOOT Concrete Specifications i $85M. FOOT Contact Person:Antonio Castro, PE, Construction Project Manager, Concrete Field Technician, Level I (954)448-2905/Antonio.Castro dot.state.fl.us Concrete Transportation Inspector, Level II i May 2010—MAY 2014: SENIOR ROADWAY I BRIDGE INSPECTOR Drilled Shaft Inspection(enrolled for July 2016 course) FDOT D6- PORT OF MIAMI (POM)TUNNEL AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Pile Driving Inspection AT WATSON &DODGE ISLANDS Earthwork Construction, Level I Served as Senior Roadway/Bridge Inspector/Assistant Project Administrator for the Earthwork Construction, Level II Tunnel connection between Watson Island and Port-Of-Miami (Dodge Island), Final Estimates, Level I connections to the Port-of-Miami Roadway System and Widening of MacArthur Final Estimates, Level II Causeway Bridge(Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintenance Project).Responsible p QC Manager l for daily inspection of all roadway activities(MSE walls,embankment,sub-grade and Troxler Nuclear Gauge Safety base installation, asphalt, and milling and resurfacing)and bridge activities including Work Zone Traffic Safety— foundation (pile driving and drilled shafts),sub-structure elements such as columns, Advanced caps and walls, and superstructure(Florida I-Beams 54",AASHTO Type VI Beams, { diaphragms and deck slab). Also, responsible for assisting Project Administrator to review the Non-Conformance Reports, Field Change Requests,MOT Reports and all field related items. SiteManager and LIMS input. DBFOM Cost: $950M. FDOT Contact Person: Jackie Sequeira, P.E., (305) 796-0376 / Jacqueline.Sequeira@dot.state.fl.us A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 7,....._, , , ,,,,.,,,., , 0....... !, .,,,,.„,,,, ': ), wl' i 1, 1 „ _. .y. -,..- .„ „:: 0 ... , . .,...., . , _ f T ,:,.,::,, , :.‘, ... ._ t 'a77 •- .-"N A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. A L t.k)1 I L L r a , EAGER 2 May 2009—April 2010: SENIOR ITS INSPECTOR FDOT D4-ITS POWER UPGRADE ALONG 1-95(DESIGN-BUILD PROJEC) Assigned as senior ITS inspector in charge of inspection of all conduit installation for upgrading the power for all ITS facilities along the I- 95 corridor in Broward County. Assisted senior project engineer in multiple construction administration functions for this design-build project. FDOT Contact Person: Jason Trujillo, P.E., (954)776-4300/Jason.Trujillo@dot.state.fl.us MARCH 2006—APRIL 2009: SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR FDOT D6—US 1 I JEWFISH CREEK BRIDGE(DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT) Responsible for daily inspection of all bridge activities including foundation(drilled shaft&concrete pile),substructure(columns and caps) and superstructure construction (8.5” deck). This is a 1.5 mile high level bridge with AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete beams replacing the old movable bridge. The main span over Jewfish Creek is 160 ft long and 67 ft high. The bridge has 69 piers with 48"-60" diameter drilled shafts. D-B Cost: $149M. FDOT Contact Person: Dari Vorce, (305)640-7412/Dari.Vorce@dot.state.fl.us JULY 2005—FEBRUARY 2006: SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR MDX 83615; SR 836 WESTBOUND AUXILIARY LANE FROM NW 57th AVE.TO NW 72nd AVE. Responsible for daily supervision and inspection of roadway construction activities,including MSE walls,and portion of the bridge activities, including reinforcing steel and concrete inspection for bridge substructure and superstructure. Construction cost: $13M. MDX Contact Person: Sergio Besu, CGC, (305) 301-1081 /SBesu@eacconsult.com JULY 2003-JUNE 2005: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY; FEMA/DERM-BELEN DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM Responsible for daily inspection of roadway drainage reconstruction and asphalt paving activities. Drainage and reconstruction projects throughout Miami-Dade County. One such project was along Coral Way from SW 97th Ave.to SW 107th Ave. MAY 2002—JUNE 2003: ADMINISTRATIVE AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR Construction Management Department, F.I.U., Miami, Florida. Fully responsible for the requisition and payment process. JANUARY 2001 -APRIL 2002: GRADUATE ASSISTANT Local Organizing Committee Assistant for the First International Conference "Construction in the 21st Century, Challenges and Opportunities in Management and Technology"in Miami. Responsible for gathering,analyzing and processing of data for research projects in the construction industry: areas of concentration included risk management,total quality management,and delays. OCTOBER 1997-DECEMBER 2000: CONSTRUCTURA TENERIFE,BOGOTA,COLOMBIA Assistant Project Manager-fully responsible for cost control,scheduling,and estimating of residential and commercial projects. OCTOBER 1995-SEPTEMBER 1997: ESTIMATOR Bidding preparation for residential projects,quantity take off,and estimation for residential and commercial projects. JANUARY 1995-SEPTEMBER 1995: STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSISTANT Structural design for office and residential projects. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. E.0) Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE C23454071 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 12/12/2021 C23454071 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 2/23/2022 C23454071 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 6/27/2019 C23454071 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 6/27/2019 C23454071 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 6/11/2021 C23454071, I Geotech Pile Driving Inspection 2/5/2022 C23454071 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 9/9/2021 C23454071 Management Final Estimates-Level 2 7/28/2021 C23454071 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 ..-. _sem y+r.' Oita' . .j ', Z-±,' illi i 46 i i :, Qa + .r ►te .. x �-5. A&P Consulting Transportation Engin ,Corp. / IttiC c'tniipi., .,,,,, ...i, 1 Li 4 A ri;' a a t iiik,,e1,1,11.11), 4."..„ , Mr. Rovira has over seventeen years of engineering experience in the fields of Envi- ronmental,Civil Engineering,and Construction Management/CEI Services. His work includes serving as a Construction Resident Engineer,Construction Project Manager, water and wastewater engineering and permitting construction field inspection and supervision.He is also very familiar with construction scheduling,cost estimating,civil engineering design, Quality assurance/Quality control. His professional experience Industry Experience: 17 years includes work for municipal and private sector clients. He has successfully completed Office Location: Doral, Florida projects for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, Miami-Dade Transit, Miami- Dade Public Works Department,Miami-Dade County&Broward County Aviation De- EDUCATION: partments, FDOT, the City of Naples for Collier County, the South Florida Water Bachelors of Science in Civil Management District (SFWMD), and the New York Department and Environmental Engineering, University of Havana, Protection(NYDEP). Cuba, 1990 KEY PROJECTS REGISTRATION: FDOT MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (MEI) CONTRACT FL P.E. No.54724 11/2012—present(Client: FDOT District VI)As Permit Senior Inspector, Mr. Rovira manages over 91 active permits for the North Dade Maintenance Facility which covers QUALIFICATIONS: the Town of Surfside,North Miami Beach,the City of Miami Beach,and the North Bay TIN no. R160438672940 FDOT Village overseeing the FDOT Permitted utility work taken place on the section of State Construction PA Academy(2012) Road(Al A, 112,907,and 934)across each Town,City and/or Municipality.Scope of FDEP'Storm-water,Erosion & work includes review of permit applications and entry of comments into the FDOT Sedimentation Control Course Electronic Review Comments(ERC)System,review and approval of lane closure ap- OSHA 40 Hour Hazardous plication requests through the FDOT Lane Closure Information System(LCIS),hosting Substance Health &Safety Course field pre-construction coordination meetings, roadway asphalt restoration and appii- OSHA 8-Hour Supervisor ) cable construction progress meetings,daily inspections of all working permits to verify /Management Health&Safety compliance with the permit conditions,the Utility Accommodations Manual(UAM),and Training Course OSHA 30-Hour the FDOT Design Standards and Standard Indexes.Types of permits inspected include Construction Safety Training Course € general,utility,drainage,access,landscape, banner,and film permits.(Contact:Alex FDOT(CTQP)Certifications: Perez, 305-640-7197) Asphalt Paving Technician Level I Asphalt Paving Technician Level II MIAMI RIVER GREENWAY STREETSCAPE PROJECT,CITY OF MIAMI (CIP), FL Final Estimates Level I and II QC t Beg. Date-End Date:02/12 to 11/2012 Sr. Field Inspector responsible for the on-site ' coordination and supervision of the activitiespertaining to the new construction and Manager Advanced MOT Training FDOT Concrete Field Inspection improvements of various infrastructure utilities within the City,s right-of-way.New con- A struction includes curb & utter, sidewalks, ADA Ramps, driveways, street lighting, ACI Concrete Field Technician, gy Level I 3 utilities relocation, new drainage,gravity walls, milling/resurfacing,and striping. MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AIRPORT'S PARALLEL TAXIWAY AND APRON EX- PANSION (COLLIER CO), NAPLES, FL. (FDOT AVIATION OFFICE'S "AIRPORT PROJECT OF THE YEAR"AWARD). Beg. Date- End Date: 04/11 —02/12. CIS Resident Engineer in connection with the construction activities for the expansion of the existing aircraft parking area and the new parallel Taxiway.Also,new drainage structures,electrical nd communication util- ities,asphaltic pavement installation,lighting,signage and markings.Responsible for A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers.Corp. lAr � ; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. t 1- 1"15R, 1 PIA RE. the implementation of the QA/QC plan to ensure work is completed in compliance with the technical, safety, and the legal contract re- quirements,detailed documentation of the on-site activities,contractor's pay items quantity tracking and verification,review of all project submittals, RFI, shop drawings, payment applications, and the construction schedule. (Robert B.Tweedie/239-642-7878). VENETIAN CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REHABILITATION(MDPWD), MIAMI, FL. Beg.Date—End Date::06/10 04/11.CIS Resident Engineer in connection with the rehabilitation of the twelve(12)bridges along the Ve- netian Causeway.The repairs included the arch beams, under deck slabs(panels),diaphragms,and piers; replacement of corroded re- inforcement bars,and damaged concrete as well as epoxy injection in cracks,and carbon fiber reinforcement. Other duties included the detailed documentation,schedule review,the contractor's pay items quantity tracking and verification;project submittals review;payment applications review and approval, project closed-out and final certification. (Mohammad Amini/ 305-592-3115). 10/2009—5/2010.GOWANUS WWPS FACILITIES UPGRADE PROJECT, NYCDEP Assistant Resident Engineer overseeing the$140M Waste Water Pump Station and associated utilities rehabilitation project for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection(NYCDEP). Duties included project coordination between the NYCDEP and the main contractors;Conducted sensitivity analysis of change orders;Track payments,cost allocation,and maintained submittal records;Ensured that all materials delivered and all work performed are in full compliance with contracts specifications and approved plans;review and ap- proved contractor's payment requisitions for accuracy;review contractor's delay claims;review payment breakdowns and detailed estimate; ensured work is completed on schedule, and complies with technical, safety, and the legal contract requirements. Other aspects of the construction included rehabilitation of a 12' diameter WW tunnel, new asphaltic & rigid pavement installation, sidewalk and roadway restoration,etc. 4/2009—9/2009. UPPER VEHICLE DRIVE AT MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT(MIA)PROJECT MDAD Project Manager for the design and construction services in connection with the center travel lane of upper vehicle drive upgrade at Miami International Airport. Professional services included field reconnaissance, production of design drawings associated with the milling and resurfacing, pavement markings,and the rigid-concrete pavement bridge deck expansion joints replacement. 2/2008—3/2009.TAXIWAY AND RAMP REHABILITATION PROGRAM, BCAD Sr.Lead Inspector/Assistant Resident Engineer in connection with the construction inspection services for the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood Intl airport taxiway"B"capital rehabilitation project,that included milling/resurfacing, pavement overlay,as well as new rigid and flexible pavement installation,and associated modification to the taxiway, including improvements to the drainage,lighting and signalization sys- tems. 1/2007—1/2008. ROAD &BRIDGE SECTION PROJECT MDPWD Sr.Project Manager for the Miami-Dade Public Works'Road&Bridge Section during design phase.Duties included plans review (30%through 100%submittals) in connection with the maintenance and improvements program to all the bridges under the Miami-Dade County Public Works jurisdiction. 1/2007—1/2008. NW 122ND STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MDPWD Project Manager during the 90%-100% design submittals of the plans for construction in connection with the 1.45-mile long roadway improvement project located at N.W. 122nd Street,from Okeechobee Road to N.W. 87th Avenue. is&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. cto111 Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE 5 R16043867 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 11/1/2018 R16043867 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 11/1/2018 R16043867 Earthwork ; Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 8/12/2020 R16043867 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 I 4/10/2018 R16043867 Management Final Estimates-Level 2 4/10/2018 R16043867 Management QC Manager II Does Not Expire Back 134215 A _ OW wr` 4 i .--1--- 1 211-e'r 4 k : .-Izir.-- '... ,.•'.....,iit t 4::p.r.;:e-"I A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. j ;',.; r;/,'::: II;L i I 1 Alliggillikj' i fillilli'at Mr.Milz has been an integral part of the CEI team at APCTE for the past 4 years. He has _ . - acquired significant experience in inspection drilled shafts foundations and overall bridge ,,,,, I i foundation construction.He is also excellently qualified in utility coordination and inspection . and coordination of signalization and lighting improvements with Miami Dade County. Heillikk 1 also played an integral part in inspection for construction of roadway infrastructure facilities i including drainage and water main and force main improvements. Industry Experience: 10 yrs KEY PROJECTS: Office Location: Doral, Florida EDUCATION: 03/2015- PRESENT. NW 25TH ST. FROM SR 826 TO NW 89TH COURT I VIADUCT Bachelor of Science in Civil WEST PHASE(FDOT FIN:251185-1-52-01 /405665-1-52-01) Engineering Senior Bridge Inspector responsible for sampling, testing and inspecting materials and Certificate of Specialization in workmanship used on the construction of this project for compliance to the plans and Environmental Engineering Florida FL. specifications. Daily activities include, field inspections, field documentation of daily International University, Miami, (May 2012) construction activities,documentation of quantities,on-site testing of materials,laboratory test results,material certifications.The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete pile QUALIFICATIONS: foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box"straddle bent cap" is State of Florida Engineering Intern then set between the columns and then eight(8) lanes of traffic and 26 spans of steel I CERTIFICATIONS: beam girders are erected and a 8.5" deck slab constructed. The over-all length of the TIN: M420-000-87-349-0 structure is 4,170 LF with the longest span being 220 ft. long. The construction of the CTQP-Ashalt PavingLevel I remainder of the project includes MSE walls,steel sheet pile bulkhead walls,cast-in-place P CTQP-Asphalt Paving Level 2 retaining wall, roadway lighting, signalization, overhead sign structures, drainage and CTQP-Final Estimates Level I asphalt paving.Contact Information:Andres Berisiartu,P.E.305.525.4976. CTQP-Concrete Field Inspector I CTQP-Earthwork Level I& II CTQP 04/2013—03/2015. FDOT DISTRICT SIX—MEI CONTRACT—SOUTH DADE OFFICE -Drilled Shaft Inspection CTQP— Pile driving CTQP—QC Manager Senior Inspector: Permit consultant responsible for providing management and technical Critical Structures Construction i engineering services to administer permits issued to developers, home owners, Issues(2014) government agencies,and utility companies to perform work within FDOT's Right of Way, Troxler-Nuclear Gauge and to ascertain that the projects are performed in reasonably close conformity with the Safety/Hazmat approved plans,technical specifications,and permit provisions.Additionally,Mr.Milz has ACI Concrete Transportation been responsible for maintaining close coordination with the Department and each Construction Inspector Field TestingContractor/Permit holder to minimize rescheduling activities due to unforeseen details and ACI Concrete Technician specific field conditions. IMSA Traffic Signal Level 1 Florida 1 Contract Consultant: In charge of monitoring numerous maintenance construction Stormwater Erosion and improvements throughout South Dade,including drainage pipe repairs and lining,asphalt Sedimentation Control(Enrolled) and concrete restoration;while ensuring quality control and strict adherence to Department Advanced MOT Standards of Specifications.Took responsible charge of invoices and payments for such 4 maintenance contracts. FDOT Reference: Keith Jimmerson, P.E.305.640.7277. 02/2013 — 03/2013. CENTRAL BROWARD ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(ATMS)FOR DISTRICT IV. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. A106, :V,', ,. 4 i:.J.:.:::. ::: Zia" 'i 1 ' : li i .---f:- r __.-_ ,,....i „..E.,:.. ... , ._ _ s., 7.--w-,-..1.r; :2. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. r.-±J __ ":'ice =,r 1,,r r,.y 7 , Ai EV 1.1 tLL rf,t .}. Drilled Shaft Inspector for the$8.9-million Design/Build Central Broward Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) for District 4. Duties included overseeing construction of over 5 Drilled Shafts for this ITS Project in Broward County. FDOT Reference: Hew Humes, P.E. 954.940.7505. 12/2012-04/2013.CITY OF MIAMI BEACH BISCAYNE POINT NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Serving as Roadway Inspector overseeing the construction of infrastructure improvements on the Biscayne Point Neighborhood Project for the City of Miami Beach.This was a Design-Build Project that included significant water and drainage improvements including pump-stations and numerous roadway construction operations. His role as an inspector consisted in part of monitoring construction activities on a daily basis and assisting the project administrator with resolution of utility conflicts, RFI responses, plan issues and pay items quantity resolution. City of Miami Beach Reference:Hermes Diaz,P.E. 305.673.7080. 01/2012—03/2012.TITAN AMERICA STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION TESTING LAB FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Foundation Research Assistant:performed drilled shaft foundation analysis;evaluated structural integrity of foundation using ultrasonic waves. Performed study using the pulse velocity method to determine the uniformity, compressive strength, and overall quality of the concrete in the drilled shaft.Constructed various drilled shaft specimens,while implementing standard testing controls. 09/2011 —10/2011.FDOT DISTRICT VI-ITS ANALYSIS-FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY AND SUNGUIDE Assisted in travel time research for SunGuide at FDOT District VI, performing traffic flow analysis.Conducted analysis of traffic conditions and traffic density along FDOT roads; evaluated status of Dynamic Message Signs(DMS)Countywide. 05/2011 -09/2011.TITAN AMERICA STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION TESTING LAB FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Structural Research Assistant: Performed fatigue testing of concrete columns under lateral loads. Evaluated Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC)wrapped with fiber reinforced polymer(FRP)under cyclic loading patterns;built specimens according to specifications of testing standards and procedures. 06/2009-08/2009.CITY OF MIAMI BEACH-PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Intern:Assisted in the Traffic Engineering Division.Conducted pneumatic traffic counts throughout the city; performed GIS mapping of bicycle and pedestrian facilities;assisted in the design of bicycle and multi-use paths throughout Miami Beach.Assisted in the design of bulb-outs at the intersection of Collins Ave and 6th Street. 02/2006-06/2009.OBRAS Y EQUIPOS SRL.SANTO DOMINGO,DOMINICAN REPUBLIC During his tenure in FI, Mr. Milz interned twice a year for 3 years at Obras y Equipos SRL located in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. He specialized in vertical construction supervising contractors in the construction of low income apartment buildings. Mr. Milz took responsible charge of payment requisitions, construction reports, material deliveries, material testing, quality control, and safety requirements. Mr. Milz specialized in the structural and roadway components of the work.As part of his civil experience he supervised the installation of base and sub grade,water and sanitary sewer mains,and stormwater management systems.Moreover,Alex acquired significant experience in claim mitigation and RFI response. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Frn Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications • TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE M42000087 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 6/26/2017 M42000087 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 6/29/2017 M42000087 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 7/21/2017 M42000087 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 I 7/13/2017 M42000087 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 I 8/9/2018 M42000087 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 10/6/2017 M42000087 Geotech Pile Driving Inspection 3/8/2021 M42000087 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 7/25/2017 M42000087 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 4w, ,was-- y ' t� r�_ _ -- - ..„- , .,2,... `= ~ .__ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. r L ..CI i ILO i :t- i DC:7i Mr. Hernandez has 40 years of experience with the Florida Department of -c---;.. Transportation both in-house and as a Consultant, 25 years in construction and 15 : years in roadway design. Specific areas of expertise include project administration, : .: construction management,roadway design,Bascule Bridge and roadway construction ,. . ., f inspection and surveying. While with the FDOT,Mr.Hernandez held several positions i ranging from Construction Project Manager, District Estimates Engineer, Final Plans Industry Experience:40 years and Contracts Engineer, Design Squad Leader, and Bridge and Roadway Inspector. Office Location:Doral, Florida RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: Undergraduate Civil Engineering A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,CORP.2004 TO PRESENT: Course Work PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR Miami-Dade Community College, As a P.A., Mr. Hernandez is responsible for day to day project activities to ensure Miami, Florida, 1979- 1985. contractor compliance with the plans and specifications and environmental permits; construction qualityassurance; assigning duties to the CEI inspectors; coordinating 9 9 QUALIFICATIONS: utility work; reviewing CPM Schedule, preparation and submittal of Final Estimate, TIN No. H65520651-000and assistingthe Senior Project Engineer as needed. o CSX Roadway Worker Protection Waiting for next assignment w Bridge Painting,Lead Awareness Construction Claims ims JULY 2015 TO APRIL 2016: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR—FDOT DESIGN BUILD PALM BEACH ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT(ATMS)SYSTEM PHASE III. Design and Operation of Work Zone Mr.Hernandez currently serves as the Project Administrator for this$7.9 million project Traffic Control in District IV. The CEI Contract involves the Advanced Transportation Management Geometric Design Workshop p Level I SY stem(ATMS)for three corridors—SR 817,SR 818,SR 7 in Broward County(FPID Final Estimates, No.431590-1-52-01)the arterial dynamic message signs(ADMS)and data collection Final Estimates,Level II sites alongSR 80/Southern Boulevard from Royal Palm Beach Boulevard to Dixie QualityControl Manager g Highway in Palm Beach County. (FPID No. 431591-1-52-01) the adaptive traffic Nuclear Gauge Safety Training control system(ATCS)on North Lake Boulevard from Military Trail to Federal Highway Work Zone Traffic Safety Intermediateon Blue Heron in Palm Beach County (FPID 432883-1-52-01) and the ADMS Work Zone Traffic Safety Advanced Boulevard (east/west approaches to 1-95) and 45th Street(east/west approaches to Concrete Field Technician Level I & II 1-95)in Palm Beach County(FPID No.433301-1-52-01)and the ATCS on Okeechobee Boulevard from Tamarind Ave. to Flagler Drive in Palm Beach County (FPID No. 433947-1-52-01).Mr.Hernandez run all Progress Meetings,handles all Supplemental Agreements and Work Orders and is responsible for the Final Estimate. FDOT Reference: Donald Vanwhervin PE(954)931-6187. JANUARY 2015 TO JULY 2015: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-FDOT DISTRICT 4 -SR-93 II-75 MANAGED LANES,SEGMENT C: This $85.2 Million Design-Build project calls for the implementation of express-lane along 1-75 from south of Miramar Parkway to South of Sheridan Street.This is one of projects ro'1ects within this District IV corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami- Dade County to 1-75 in Miami-Dade County, The project calls for construction within the existing 166-ft wide median a four lane divided toll road. Project also includes A&F'Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Alt. AM-- -Z,4 7rs.Z r ,r �re.r'" "re ' 4 ''.'f; __r A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. -.4,-.:-.---:,,:z; C';1 /F1t( t. MW' C DEZ .w.. construction of a new bridge over 1-75 at Pembroke Road and replacement of the existing Miramar Parkway overpass bridge including the total reconstruction of the interchange. Mr. Hernandez serves as the Project Administrator for all bridge construction in the project. Contact Name:Antonio Castro, P.E. (954)448-2905. JULY 2011 TO MARCH 2015: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR — FDOT DISTRICT 4 - SR-862/ELLER DRIVE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS. This$38 Million project includes 4 new bridges,mechanically stabilized earth walls,railroad construction,water main,sanitary force main, high mast street lighting, traffic signals, drainage, concrete roadway pavement and other relative items. FDOT Contact person: Donald Vanwhervin PE(954)931-6187. 07/2010- 07/2011: CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST/SENIOR BRIDGE INSPECTOR-FDOT DISTRICT 6- NW 25TH STREET VIADUCT. This $115 Million construction project included two new viaduct bridges and new roadway construction with MSE walls, drainage and pavement. Mr. Hernandez was assigned the task of completing and submitting the Final Estimates Package. FDOT Contact Person: Mr. Mario Cabrera, P.E 305.216.4962. 06/2008-07/2010: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-FDOT DISTRICT 6-SR-7/5TH STREET MIAMI RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT. This$59 million construction project included construction of a new bascule bridge with mechanical and electrical components and new roadway construction with MSE walls,drainage and pavement. FDOT Contact Person: Mr. Mario Cabrera, P.E.305.216.4962. 07/2009-07/2011: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR — FDOT DISTRICT 4 - DEERFIELD BEACH TRAIN STATION AND MUSEUM REHABILITATION PROJECT. This is a$ 1.3 Million design build project calling for rehabilitation of the Tri-Rail Station Ticket Office and Ancillary Historical Museum.His major contribution was assisting the Department's Project Manager in coordination activities with Amtrak,Tri-Rail,and the City of Deerfield Beach. FDOT Contact Person:Jessie Smiley, P.E,954.270.2406. 08/2007-09/2008: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR — FDOT DISTRICT 4- MISCELLANEOUS CEI CONTRACT- BRIDGE FENDER REHABILITATION UNDER 1-95 ON THE DANIA CUTOFF CANAL On this$916,370 Bridge Rehabilitation,Mr. Hernandez was responsible for overseeing cost,quality of work in conformance to plans and specifications, contractor performance in all phases by the team of inspectors, reviewing schedule, and preparation of the monthly contractor payments, preparation of Supplemental Agreements and Work Orders, and preparation of the Final Estimate. FDOT Contact Person: Mr. Ehgbal Jalali 954.290.4261 08/2006— 06/2007: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR—FDOT DISTRICT 4- BASCULE BRIDGE REHABILITATION ON HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD OVER THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY AND A-1-A. On this$11,200,000 Bascule Bridge Rehabilitation, Mr. Hernandez was responsible for overseeing cost,quality of work in conformance to plans and specifications, contractor performance in all phases by the team of inspectors, reviewing schedule,and preparation of the monthly contractor payments, preparation of Supplemental Agreements and Work Orders, and preparation of the Final Estimate . His duties included handling all day to day activities that are usually shared with one Sr.Project Engineer,an Office Engineer and one Secretary. His staff was limited to a Part time Sr. P.E. and two full time inspectors with support on an as-needed basis from additional inspection firms. FDOT Contact Person: Mr. Ehgbal Jalali 954.290.4261 A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. • • Florida Department of Transportations Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP I QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE H65520651 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire s Back 134215 __ . . .,...,, ott. . .i . ' --,,, -_ r ! . 3. i Y : - Jr.:. ' -'.:'A '''':::::::' -tr! '-: - 4: 'r•` A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. k'j ' llii LiljbArcumir.i. irrirg , ,, 11 �� ,, # MrGarcia has acquired significant experience in the inspection of complex drainagee kr(Ii144,..iiiip. istructures and MOT He is veryfamiliar with FDOT policies and procedures for re a - gi , ration of work orders and supplemental agreements for extra work. He also is highly ,.,0, proficient with computers and has excellent oral and written skills. Office Location: Doral, Florida KEY PROJECTS Industry Experience:6 Years EDUCATION: FDOT MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (MEI)CONTRACT: University of Florida-Gainesville, 11/2014- Present (Client: FDOT District VI)Assistant Project Manager/Sr. Contract Florida,Awarded Bachelor's of Sci- Inspector. Mr. Garcia manages several contracts with a net worth of$1.2M in the ence in Civil Engineering, December North Miami-Dade area. These contracts deal with maintenance and improvements 2011. p of roadside drainage systems, bridges and roadways. Scope of work includes: in- QUALIFICATIONS: spections of multiple work order activities such as;concrete,drainage,earthwork,as- E.I.#1100018392 phalt,bridge repair and MOT. Reviewing contract documents and invoices.Reviewing TIN No. G620-677-88-222-1 and negotiating cost break downs for change orders as well as creating supplemental CERTIFICATIONS agreements. Creating work orders and plan reviews. Creating as-built/mark-ups. •Asphalt Paving, Level 1&2 Gathering estimates for work order contract items. Coordinating and hosting field • Earthwork Construction Inspection, meetings with contractors. Reviewing lane closure requests through the FDOT Lane Level 1&2 Closure Information System (LCIS). •ACI Concrete Technician, Level 1 FDOT Contact Person: IvanhoeHernandez •Concrete Field Technician Levet 1 I e nandez,(305}640- 7154 • Final Estimating, Level 1. • Pile Driving FDOT MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (MEI) CONTRACT. •Drilled Shaft Inspection i MIAMI, FLORIDA: •Quality Control Manager 10/2013- 10/2014(Client: FDOT District As Senior Contract Ins ector Mr.Garcia VI) Inspector, •Nuclear Gauge Safety w/HAZMAT managed several contracts with a net worthof 1. in •Advanced MOT 9 e rt $ 6M the North Miami-Dade area. •Construction Inspection of Critical These contracts deal with maintenance and improvements of drainage systems, Structures ' bridges and roadways. Scope of work included: daily inspections of multiple work •Auger Cast Pile Inspection order activities such as; concrete, drainage, earthwork, asphalt, bridge repair and •MSE Wall Construction MOT. Reviewingcontract invoice documents. Creatingwork orders, supplemental PP Software Familiarity: agreements and plan reviews. Gathering estimates for work order contract items. •AutoCAD, 5yrs I Coordinating and hosting field meetings with contractors. Reviewing lane closer re- •Microsoft Suite quests through the FDOT Lane Closure Information System (LCIS). FDOT Contact } • RS Means Person: Ivanhoe Hernandez, (305)640-7154 owaste•FI M r • Pond Pack •Geostudio2007—Slope/W CITY OF MIAMI BEACH-BISCAYNE POINT NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: 06/2012-09/2013(Client:City of Miami Beach)Served as Roadway Inspector,over- , saw the construction of infrastructure improvements Neighbor- , on the Biscayne Point Nei $ 9 3 , A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 7.4.7'� ' it. . , *ft." -*::::::,:!. .., .4,0,1 wi i i,I, 1 -,,,,,, , wi• ,.„ _ . .... ,. :. -. .. ,..„.. , : _ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. . r riHi' LIP tt' ' Prl A '''" 1 1 I , d.. ',...,M .,.,"?..., rrt I-,4. =' -,t,?r i hood Project, $12.5M. This Design-Build Project included significant watermain,drainage and roadway construction. Inspected and re- ported the construction of one pump station, six injection wells, nine gravity wells and several drainage structures. Mr. Garcia oversaw all the milling and resurfacing work on the project as well as the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk. He coordinated with contractors/subcontractors on a daily basis to expedite resolution of project issues. Mr.Garcia created accurate as-built information using surveying methods. Ensured all work was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. City of Miami Beach Contact Person:Carla Dixon, (305) 673-7000 DELLANOS CONSTRUCTION INC., ISLAMORADA, FLORIDA: 06/11 -05/12(Private Properties)Worked in carpentry,activities included;tying rebar for reinforced concrete,raising settling foundations, constructed wood and metal formwork,assembled and installed partitions and demolition work etc. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 111 • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE G62067788 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 11/9/2017 G62067788 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 11/9/2017 G62067788 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 6/8/2018 G62067788 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 11/16/2017 G62067788 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 4/25/2020 G62067788 Geotech Pile Driving Inspection 7/13/2018 G62067788 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 10/24/2017 G62067788 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 0-." ..„,..,. .... . _qr....if , r , .. '3 * .!:,,:,,-. ",,, ,,, . , : " * : . - , - , _ - ,'.* , • . 1 ', '',. '' ' RE 1 1 , .- ."...r - .ato , ',- A&P Consulting Transportation Enginee ,Corp. ♦ e.1. � .�� III 47' ="sem. - . InPGE A EI ._ iA gib-.�... Y f :1" titl` 1 Mr.Abela has over 27years of extensive experience in Transportation/Structural and ii ,A0,4:,,, related projects, including Airports, buildings and Civil Site Work, in which 3 years were with the Florida Department of Transportation's District Six Office. Mr.Abela's transportation/structural engineering experience includes project management, roadway design, site civil design, signing and pavement marking design, public involvement and signal design. Mr. Abela has been involved in numerous Industry Experience:27 years bridge/structural projects where he has developed special skills in the plans production Location: Doral, FL area through the use of Microstation and specialized application software such as GEOPAK&REBAR, along with structural design and calculations of units. He is also EDUCATION skilled in computer applications for design of transportation related facilities. He has Undergraduate Civil En ineerin extensive experience in the use of AutoCAD, MicroStation and Geopak to develop g g g complete sets of constructionplans, which have included State Roads, Runways, Course Work(3 years) p y Florida International UniversityTaxiways,Aprons and Parkings. KEY PROJECTS: CERTIFICATIONS TIN no.A14043263 SR-826/SR-836 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Final Estimates Level I FDOT DISTRICT VI Palmetto/Dolphin Expressway Interchange, Miami, FL. Project Manager for the EXPERIENCE reconstruction of a four level interchange, consisting of direct-connect ramps in all Senior Designer I May 2011 to quadrants between SR 826 and SR 836.This project includes the reconstruction of 6 Present:APCTE miles of expressway and 52 bridges. Entire project to be constructed with full maintenance of traffic,requiring detailed traffic control plans as part of the final design. Senior Designer I October 2007 to Responsible for the geometric design, typical sections, plans preparation and plans May 2011: URS production as well as Structural Designer for AASHTO beam bridges,retaining walls, General Contractor Februa 2006 and sheet pile walls. Construction cost $650 million Other improvements include ry retainingwalls lighting,sound walls,canal relocation utilities JPA plans,si nalization to October 2007:J.R.Superior ' g ' new signing and pavement markings, new ITS, and special aesthetic features. Mr. Contractors Abela was CAAD technician responsible for detailingthe superstructure components Senior Designer May1998 to p p 9of various concrete bridges including bridge deck,finish grade elevations,expansion February 2006: URS joints and superstructure details.Also responsible for detailing multi-column frame Designer I October 1996 to May piers, end bents and pile caps. FDOT Contact Information: Jason Chang, P.E. (305) 1998: Biscayne Engineering 470-5331. Designer 110/1995 to 10/1996: FDOT D-6 NEW TERMINAL, KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,MONROE COUNTY. CADD Technician I September 1987 Senior Civil Engineer in charge of design and construction assistance of the new to April 1995: HNTB 42,000- square foot terminal in Key West. The work will consist of an elevated passenger terminal, a new roadway access, elevated access road, a bridge, and a double-parking deck.The terminal will have airline offices, departures, arrival areas, restaurant, baggage claim area, and an area for security passenger screening.Total cost of the project exceeds$25 Million.CAD technician responsible for the preparation of construction drawings for the terminal building including foundation plans, roof framing plans,wall sections and connection details. Performed quantity calculations. Contact Information:Peter Horton(305)809-5200. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. N 31M 1 k t 4 ii °' A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 10PV b AIRCRAFT RESCUE FIRE FIGHTING (ARFF)FACILITY, KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MONROE COUNTY. Construction of ARFF Building,with 3 bays for fire vehicles.Also, including a new electrical vault for the existing airfield lighting circuits, apron floodlights and connection to the existing control tower.CAD technician involved in the preparation of construction plans for a two- story metal hanger building. Responsibilities included steel connection details,roof framing and foundation layouts.Contact Information: Peter Horton (305)809-5200. STANDBY DIESEL GENERATOR WITH BUILDING,KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MONROE COUNTY. Senior Civil Engineer assisting the project manager in design, coordination with the architect and different agencies of this new 2-story building.The new 2-story building and the installation of the standby diesel generator provide emergency power service for the Key West International Airport terminal building. CAD technician involved in the preparation of construction plans for a two-story elevated concrete building supported on pile foundations. Responsibilities included foundation plan, wall sections, roof framing plan and staircase details. Contact Information: Peter Horton(305)809-5200. SR-A1A1 SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE FROM MIAMI-DADE/BROWARD COUNTY LINE TO SEACREST PARKWAY,BROWARD COUNTY Client Name: FDOT District IV. Project Reference: Fausto Gomez, P.E. (954) 777-4466. Project Length:0.90 miles. Project Role: Senior Designer. Beg. Date - End Date: 01/2012—On Going. Scope of Work:This is a milling and resurfacing project including the installation of video detections at signalized intersections, installation of pedestrian signal countdown,signal upgrades from concrete poles to mast arms(pending to signalization evaluation and analysis),signing and pavement markings,ADA improvements which consist of replacing damaged sidewalk and replacing noncompliant curb ramps where needed, and implementation of bicycle lanes, where possible. In addition,the City of Hallandale Beach,Public Works Department will enter into a Joint Participation Agreement(JPA)with the Department to install decorative pedestrian lighting. SR-51 US-1 FROM SR-94 I KENDALL DRIVE TO SW 80TH STREET I DAVIS ROAD, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Client Name: FDOT District VI. Project Reference:Judy Solaun-Gonzalez, P.E.(305)470-5207. Project Length:0.86 miles.Project Role: Senior Designer.Beg.Date-End Date: 10/2010—11/07/11.Scope of Work:This was a Milling and Resurfacing project with minor drainage improvements, sidewalk and curb and gutter repairs, re-construction of curb ramps to comply with ADA requirements and new signing and pavement markings.Seven(7)sub-standard signalized intersections were improved with the replacement of pedestrian signal heads to count-downs, replacement of pedestrian detectors(push buttons) and signs to comply with ADA requirements.Also, new controllers, traffic signal pull boxes, internally illuminated street signs at the existing mast arms, loops and conduits were replaced.Signal pedestals were installed where the existing mast arms were far from the crosswalks. Project also included a Safety project 425583-1 which included the NB Left Turn widening at SW 67th Avenue and East-West Pedestrian crosswalks. DESIGN-BUILD OF SR-90/SW 8 ST AT HEFT INTERCHANGE, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Client Name: FDOT District VI. Project Reference: Jose Barrera, P.E. (305) 470-5260. Project Length: 0.55 miles. Project Role: Senior Designer. Beg. Date-End Date:03/2010—02/2011.Scope of Work:This was a Roadway safety project along SR-90 from the HEFT SB On-Ramp intersection to the HEFT NB On-Ramp intersection.This project included median widening to accommodate dual left-turn move- ments entering the HEFT ramps, reconstruction of the SB On-ramp from a single lane to two-lane ramp, resurfacing on SR-90,drainage improvements, signing &pavement markings,utility coordination and signalization improvements.At both signalized intersections along the project limits,the mast arms were removed and new ones were installed with new traffic signal heads,pedestrian signal heads,pedes- trian detectors (push buttons) with signs, pull boxes, signal loops, new conduits and installation of new controllers in order to provide a new movement to the additional lanes for the HEFT ramp and the SB On-ramp. In addition,there were areas where sidewalks and curb and gutter needed repairs and all curb ramps were re-constructed so they can meet ADA requirements ,,,�,. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. AM ,9 ' . ,:,, . ., 11 "w----i!` • ' rpt _ .. • --- ,. ,;,,i;; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. t- ‘ I 9f HA"ivi'lc 1 4 ; ?",trii i i /i, I , .4 5. C t W Mr. Hawkins has over 16 years of experience dedicated to the construction, 44 4, engineering,inspection,ITS testing,management and installation of fiber optic design and infra-structure. Since 1995, Mr. Hawkins was involved in the engineering and construction of Level(3)'s Fiber Optic network in Downtown Miami Dade Metro Ring. From 2004 to 2006 involved in F.D.O.T.'s Sun NAV Project, with 85 miles of ITS Infrastructure and testing turn up.He also served Sr.Inspector for ITS on the Sawgrass Years of Experience: 16 Years 1 and 2 WideningProjects and Sr. Inspector for ITS on the Miami Dade Expressway Office Location:Ft. Lauderdale p Authority. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Electronics, KEY PROJECTS: Stockton State College. Computer Program Certificate,At- 08/2014-PRESENT. FDOT DESIGN-BUILD PALM BEACH ADVANCED TRAFFIC !antic , MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(ATMS), PHASE III County Vocational School Mr. Hawkins serves as Senior ITS Inspector for this $7.9-million project. The CEI contract involves the Advanced Transportation Management System(ATMS)for Three QUALIFICATIONS: Corridors-SR-817, SR-818, SR-7 in Broward County(FPID No. 431590-1-52-01), State of Florida Engineering Intern the Arterial Dynamic Message Signs (ADMS) and Data Collection Sites along SR- 80/Southern Blvd from Royal Palm Beach Boulevard to Dixie Highway in Palm Beach CERTIFICATIONS: County No. 431591-1-52-01 , the Ada tive Traffic Control (ATCS) on ) P System TIN:H25233261-000 Northlake Boulevard from Military Trail to Federal Highway in Palm Beach County r (FPID No. 432883-1-52-01), and the ADMS on Blue Heron Boulevard (east/west CPR Certified Light Brigade (iber i approaches and 45th Street (east/west approaches95 in Palm Beach to 1-95) to 1- ) splicing County(FPID No. 433301-1-52-01), nd the ATCS on Okeechobee Boulevard from Certified Wireless Network Adminis- "ou `'� and ` ' tra-tor ITamarind Avenue to Flagler Drive in Palm Beach County(FPID No.433947-1-52-01). IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level i FDOT Reference: Hew Humes, P.E., (954)734-3827. I IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level II(currently enrolled 01/2014-08/2014. FDOT SENIOR ITS INSPECTOR FOR ATMS PROJECT ON 4 IMSA Fiber Optic Level 1 CORRI- DORS LOCATED IN SOUTHERN BROWARD COUNTY.PHASE II. CCNA and CWNA Certificates Mr. Hawkins served as Senior ITS Inspector for this$7.9-million project.Deployment OSHA Construction Safety&Health a new dedicated communications network including Fiber Optic cables and conduits, Nuclear Gauge Safety Training Ad- Deployment of arterial ITS devices, including: Closed circuit television (CCTV) vanced Maintenance of Traffic cameras; Arterial dynamic message signs (ADMS); Microwave vehicle detection system(MVDS);and Arterial travel time system(ATTS),Fiber Optic connection to the Mr. Hawkins has extensive expert- existin traffic sinal cabinets, as well as the integration with Transportation ence and trainingin the fields of: g g g Management Center(TMC). FDOT Reference: Hew Humes, P.E.,(954)734-3827. Fiber Installation Inspection and ODTR Fiber Testing 02/2012-12/2013. FDOT SENIOR ITS INSPECTOR FOR THE DESIGN/BUILD OF CEN-TRAL BROWARD ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(ATMS),DMR Operation and Testing Con- troller Operation and Testing CCTV PHASE III. Installation, Operation and Testing Mr. Hawkins served as Senior ITS Inspector for this$8.9-million project.The project involved installation of arterial dynamic message signs,CCTV cameras,AVI and Blue- tooth travel 4! ^G systems, microwave vehicle detectors,Crt ansi signal priority sy + rm A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. ,,...._.. , . ..„,,rm Alek, , , ,,, .4,_,,::::::,:....,:r- ro , -• .- --fi :,--..,;-„'' -_* ,. ,� ,= �.,.�.._ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. nT s 3 ARVEY LI f 6W� ss and fiber optic cable infrastructure on five major north/south and east/west arterials in Central Broward County. FDOT Reference: Hew Humes, P.E., (954)734-3827. 08/2010-0212012.ALLIGATOR ALLEY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY PROJECT ON SR 93(1-75)IN BROWARD AND COLLIER COUNTIES Senior ITS Inspector for this$4.3 Million ITS Design-Build Project on the 1-75 Alligator Alley Corridor for Districts 1 and 4.The contract included the installation of Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), microwave vehicle detectors, CCTV cameras and fiber optic cable in- frastructure. FDOT Reference: Eduardo Caballero, P.E. 561.432.4966. 06/2008-07/2010. SENIOR ITS INSPECTOR FIBER OPTICS—MDX SR 924, 112,878,874 Oversaw installation of fiber optic infrastructure and placement of MVDS,CCTV's and electrical load centers.Daily reporting and monitoring of fiber optic cabling, CCTV cameras and Vehicle Detection Systems. Testing and verification of all ITS equipment and final inspections of electrical load centers and FPL service drops. Miami Dade Expressway Contact Person: Mr. Ramon Borges 786.393.0494. 06/2007-6/2008. SENIOR INSPECTOR FIBER OPTICS — SAWGRASS WIDENING CORAL RIDGE DR. TO ATLANTIC BLVD BROWARD, FL Inspect and test fiber optics and cameras for and 6 mile stretch along the Sawgrass Expressway. Duties include daily report and monitoring of fiber optic,Vehicle Detection Systems and pole installation, as well as splice vaults, pulls boxes, and required hook-ups.Testing and verification of CCTV, DMS and VDS equipment. Final inspection of electrical load centers and ohm's reading of light poles. Turnpike Enterprise Contact Person: Mr. Mario Rojas. 954.975.4855 6/2006-06/2007. SENIOR INSPECTOR FIBER OPTICS—SAWGRASS WIDENING CORAL RIDGE DR. TO TURNPIKE, BROWARD, FL Inspect and test fiber optics and cameras for an 8 mile stretch along the Sawgrass Expressway. Duties include daily report and mon- itoring of fiber optic and pole installation, as well as splice vaults, pulls boxes, and required hook-ups.Testing and verification of CCTV, DMS and VDS equipment Final inspection of electrical load centers and ohm's reading of light poles. Tumpike Enterprise Contact Person: Mr. Mario Rojas. 954.975.4855 PROJECT EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS: •Palm Beach ATMS •Southern Broward ATMS •Central Broward ATMS •Alligator Alley ITS Safety Project • 1-75-ITS Design-Build Project FDOT Districts 1 and 4. •MDX SR 924, 112, 878, 874. •Sawgrass Widening Coral Ridge Dr to Atlantic Blvd Broward, FL. •Sawgrass Widening Coral Ridge Dr to Turnpike, Broward, FL. • Fiber Optics/Cameras Inspecting/testing Palm Beach, Martin&St. Lucie Counties. ABP Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. _ .. , , .....,, Pk- -3. - . 4::----e, r !,elmorfit ' r vil ' --., ,,,L. 0_,..,... ..i. , ' - - .0. - - - Y , . - --- *'''' ‘-.'•4,. .St‘-1-:P'17'".. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Co , ' +vh b. .:. _n c..a„n.. `9r'..av,.J vt':•�,:w,.« .: mnw,tir..: iASON P , El PAGE II: , } t or... .„,, Mr.Perez has over 10 years of construction engineering experience working in CEI of I a variety of projects for City of Miami Beach,FDOT and Miami-Dade County.Mr.Perez has excellent design-build experience. He has acquired the required experience and 1111164111 certifications to provide the services and contribute to the implementation of any infrastructure improvement project. Years of Experience: 10 Years KEY PROJECTS: Office Location:Doral, FL EDUCATION FDOT DISTRICT 4 -SR-93 11-75 MANAGED LANES, SEGMENT C - SENIOR PursingBachelors of Science in Civil INSPECTOR express-lane This $85.2 Million Design-Build project calls for the implementation of Engineering(BICE) g p p Florida International Universityalong 1-75 from south of Miramar Parkway to South of Sheridan Street.This is one of 1 p Miami, Florida projects ects within this District IV corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami- Dade County to 1-75 in Miami-Dade County,The project calls for construction within CERTIFICATIONS the existing 166-ft wide median a four lane divided toll road. Project also includes Tin ID NO. construction of a new bridge over 1-75 at Pembroke Road and replacement of the P62043087 1 existing Miramar Parkway overpass bridge including the total reconstruction of the interchange. Mr. Hernandez serves as the Project Administrator for all bridge CTQP Qualifications construction in the project. Contact Name: FDOT Dist. 4/Antonio Castro, P.E. (954) Asphalt Paving Technician Level I& 448-2905. 2 Earthwork Construction Level I&2 Drilled Shaft Inspection Pile Drivin 03/2012-04/2016. NW 25TH ST. FROM SR 826 TO NW 89TH COURT I VIADUCT g WEST PHASE (FDOT FIN: 251185-1-52-01 / 405665-1-52-01) - SENIOR Final Estimates Level I& II QC Manager INSPECTOR g Post-Tensioning Technician Level 1 Scope: Responsible for sampling,testing and inspecting materials and workmanship ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATIONS used on the construction of this project for compliance to the plans and specifications. Bonded PT Level 1 Daily activities include, field inspections, field documentation of daily construction BCI Coating Inspection Level I activities, documentation of quantities, on- site testing of materials, laboratory test ACI Concrete Field Tech. Level I results, material certifications.The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete pile ACI Concrete Field Tech. Level II foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box"straddle bent cap" Troxler Nuclear Gauge Training is then set between the columns and then eight (8) lanes of traffic and 26 spans of Florida Work Zone Traffic Control - steel I beam girders are erected and a 8.5"deck slab constructed.The over-all length Adv Stormwater, Erosion and Sedi- of the structure is 4,170 LF with the longest span being 220 ft.long.The construction mentation Control Inspection of the remainder of the project includes MSE walls, steel sheet pile bulkhead walls, Drilled Shaft cast-in-place retaining wall,roadway lighting,signalization,overhead sign structures,FDOT Concrete Specifications drainage and asphalt paving.Client/Contact Name/Phone: FDOT District 06/Andres Berisiartu P.E./(305)525-4976 09/2007-0712011.NW 25TH ST.FROM SR 826 TO NW 67TH AVE I VIADUCT FROM EAST OF SR 826 TO NW 22ND ST.(FDOT FIN: 251185-2-52-01 1405665-3-52-01) -INSPECTOR Scope: Responsible for sampling,testing and inspecting materials and workmanship _V:..:....,...,,.._,,,�. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. .e • „..„.,r.,, glik : '. -,,.... ., _ , ' - " A .. .rte .. ,s ‘ . -.:i .-„y,,. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. JAS(JN PERtLi used on the construction of this project for compliance to the plans and specifications. Daily activities include, field inspections, field documentation of daily construction activities, documentation of quantities,on-site testing of materials, laboratory test results, material certifications.The construction of this project consists of the widening and reconstruction of NW 25th St,the new construction of NW 68th Ave from NW 22nd St.to NW 25th St.,widening the ramps to and from SR 826 and the construction of a viaduct from NW 22nd St.to SR 826 constructed over the westbound lanes of NW 25th St. The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete pile foundations with CIP concrete footings and columns.A steel box"straddle bent cap”is then set between the columns and then eight(8)lanes of traffic and 26 spans of steel I beam girders are erected and a 8.5"deck slab constructed.The over-all length of the structure is 4,170 LF with the longest span being 220 ft. long. The construction of the remainder of the project includes MSE walls, steel sheet pile bulkhead walls, cast-in- place retaining wall,roadway lighting,signalization,overhead sign structures,drainage and asphalt paving.Client/Contact Name/Phone: FDOT District 06/Mario Cabrera, PE/(305)216-4962. 11/2010-2/2011.CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 44TH WEST ST.DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT ORCHARD PARK—RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE Responsible for Resident Project Represnetative services of a new drainage system which included valley gutter inlets, 18",24"and 30" RCP pipes,oil water separator structure,and connection to an existing 30"outfall,new valley gutter and sidewalk,milling and resurfacing and landscape improvements.Some of the services provided for this project included:Weekly construction/coordination meeting,Perform all shop drawing program functions, Respond to Request for Information (RFI's), Contract documents clarifications, Inspect all MOT Operations, Review, track,and maintain construction schedules.Client/Contact Name/Phone: DMSI/David Mancini/(305)532-8827. 03/2008-09/2008. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRAIRIE AVENUE ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION--RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE Responsible for RPR services of a new drainage system which included one Pump Station w/2 pumps ( Flow= 5000gpm, TDH=21.8 feet, HP=50,Total Area=9.05 Acres),valley gutter inlets, 18",24"and 30"RCP pipes,oil water separator structure,and connection to an existing 30"outfall, new valley gutter and sidewalk, milling & resurfacing, signing & pavement markings, minor signalization work and landscape improvements.Some of the services provided for this project included:Weekly construction/coordination meeting, Perform all shop drawing program functions, Respond to Request for Information (RFI's), Contract documents clarifications, Inspect all MOT Operations, Review,track,and maintain construction schedules. Client/Contact Name/Phone: City of Miami Beach/Eric Carpenter/(305) 335-1269 05/2007-08/2007. ROADWAY INSPECTOR AS PART OF THE MIAMI-DADE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OVERSEEING CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL MIAMI-DADE COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS PARTICULARLY WIDENING AND RECONSTRUCTION OF EUREKA DRIVE(SW 184TH ST.)FROM SW 127TH AVE.TO SW 137TH AVE—ROADWAY INSPECTOR This project is valued at $10 million. Jason also assisted an inspection of the bridge widening over 137th Ave. and adjacent canal. Client/Contact Name/Phone: MDPWD/ Ron Gibbon/(305)281-7611 9/2006-12/2006. SR 9 (INTERSTATE 1-95) FROM 12TH AVE SOUTH TO 10TH AVE NORTH IN PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR FDOT DISTRICT IV—QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR(LEVEL II TECHNICIAN) Jason was responsible for implementation of the contractor's quality control plan for all Asphalt and Earthwork construction on the project in conformance with section 105 of the FDOT specifications.As a Level I technician working for the contractor(Astaldi Construction)CQC team. Jason was in charge of performing Earthwork/Embankment testing. Ensured that asphalt temperature and spread rate was within target and recorded cross slopes. Client/Contact Name/Phone: FDOT District 04/Eduardo Caballero, P.E., Project Manager/(954)777- 4567 %&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Qualifications Search Page 1 of 1 Flat) C1111) 111h • • . Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE P62043087 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 9/9/2021 P62043087 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 9/9/2021 P62043087 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 7/13/2017 P62043087 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 5/1/2018 P62043087 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 4/25/2020 I II II II � I P62043087 II Geotech II Pile Driving Inspection I I 3/4/2020 P62043087 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 5/20/2020 P62043087 Management Final Estimates-Level 2 5/20/2020 P62043087 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire P62043087 Structures Qualified Post-Tensioning Technician-Level 1 5/21/2018 IBack 134215 http://ctgpflor-ida.com/ctgp_datalxxxyy23q.asp?search=P62043087 9/26/2016 i„. ,, ,,,.„,,,: .i: „ . ,_... , , , .4'. a ' - - - ;" t ' a- a • " " '•• a •' ' ''''" :1;;;I'A ' - ...:''' - 1'' .....•''' .; .' RESUME • rim r „it, . . _ ;,, 7-'1' ,. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. y r-w ;.Af ,.,,,,,i 'il WLFREDO SUAR Ri . : , Mr.Suarez Mulkay has over 31 years of experience providing civil engineering design and field engineering services including most recently sewing in the CEI of FDOT, ilia MDX, City of Miami and City of Dora/projects. Prior to migrating to the United States in 2003, Mr. Suarez Mulkay worked for seven years with VEPICA, one of the largest multi-disciplinary engineering firms in Venezuela. Subsequent to 1997, Mr. Suarez Mulkay worked for the Cuban government providing field and design engineering Industry Experience:31 yrs services for infrastructurero•ects. Mr.Suarez Mulka 's experience has been primarily Office Location:Doral, Florida pMulkay's focused on the design and construction of water/wastewater and roadway/bridge EDUCATION: projects. Bachelors of Science in Civil Engi- neering, ISPJAE, Havana University, KEY PROJECTS: 1978-1984 4/15— PRESENT: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR—NW 97TH AVENUE ROADWAY QUALIFICATIONS: CONSTRUCTION FROM NW 70TH ST TO NW 74TH ST. Licenses: Professional Engineer, i This $1.3 million project consists of new roadway construction including drainage Florida Lic. No.76057 system,street lighting,landscaping,sidewalks,signing and pavement markings. City of Doral Ref.: Rudy De La Torre (786)236-5912. CERTIFICATIONS TIN No. 061-000 7114—2/15: ROADWAY SENIOR INSPECTOR-1-75 EXPRESS LANES SEGMENT Asphalt Paving Inspector, Level I C. Asphalt Paving Inspector, Level II This design Buildproject consists of new roadwayconstruction to accommodate 4 FDOT Concrete Specifications g Drilled Shaft Inspection express lanes in the median of the 1-75 highway to connect with the 1-595 Express Way. FDOT District 4 Ref.:Aurelio Matos, A.`G. (305)323-1462.Pile Driving Inspection Earthwork Construction Level I Earthwork Construction Level II 4/14— 7/14: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR - GARDEN SEWER AND ROADWAY Quality Control Manager IMPROVEMENTS. Final Estimates, Level I This$0.7 million project consists of new drainage exfiltration trenches installation, Final Estimates, Level II milling and resurfacing,side walk reconstruction and pavement striping from NW 38th Concrete Field Technician Level I ST to NW 37th ST and from NW 27th Ave.to NW 24th Ave.Clty of Miami Ref.:David Concrete Transportation Level II ' Adato,P.E. (305)416-1899. Troxler Nuclear Gauge Safety Post-Tensioning Inspection 5/12—3/14: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR - FLAGAMI TRAFFIC CALMING AND Work Zone Traffic Safety Advanced DRAINAGE INSTALLATION PROJECT. Bridge Coating Inspector,Grade I Thisro'ect consists on construction of Roundabouts at various intersections on the Florida Stormwater, Erosion and p t Sedimentation Control Inspection . Flagami neighborhood and new drainage system installation. City of Miami Ref.: p Valentine Onuigbo, P.E. (305)416-2588. 8/13—12113:PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT PHASE I,VIRGINIA AND MARY STREETS. This$0.6 million project consists of replacement of sidewalk brick pavers,installation of 2" PVC conduits for new street lighting system, landscape including installation of Silva Cell root system reconstruction of driveways and handicap ramps. City of Miami Ref.: Maurice Hardy, (305)416-1786. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. AUL, 11- Wiwi* e - _ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. W LSUAREZ-MULKAY, PAGE 2J7 4/13 TO 7/13: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-NW 114TH AVENUE 41ST STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM NW 41ST ST TO NW 39TH ST. Project consisting of road Drainage including the installation of 8 new drainage structures and exfiltration trenches,roadway reconstruction to accommodate a Left turn from NW 114th Ave.on to NW 41st ST West,sidewalk reconstruction,asphalt paving,signing and pavement marking, utility relocation and installation of new 42'arm for signal. City of Doral Ref.: Rudy De La Torre (786)236-5912. 4/12—2/13:PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-MIAMI RIVER GREENWAY FROM SW 5TH ST TO SW 7TH ST AND FROM S.MIAMI AVE. RD.TO SW 1ST AVE. This $0.8 million project belongs to the Miami River Greenway master plan being built by the City of Miami along the Miami River in different phases this phase is funded by the FDOT through the LAP program. The project consists of drainage, milling and resurfacing, side walk reconstruction, street lighting,signing and pavement marking and landscape.City of Miami Ref.:Valentine Onuigbo, P.E. (305) 416-2588. 5/11 —5/12: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-DURHAM DRAINAGE AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. This$1.8 million project included new drainage system installation, milling and resurfacing, signing and pavement marking throughout Durham neighborhood from NW 7th ST to NW 3rd ST and from NW 38th TER to NW 42nd Ave. City of Miami Ref.:Valentine Onuigbo, P.E.(305)416-2588. 10/09—2/12: PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-CANAL BANK STABILIZATION PROGRAM,CITY OF DORAL. This project won the 2012 APWA Florida Chapter award in the category of$10-$25 million.That phase include NW 117th Ave.from NW 25th ST to NW 58th ST and NW 25th ST from 97th Ave.to 99th Ave.on the City of Doral.Responsible for reviewing Contractor's Payment Applications, Change Order Analysis and contractor's compliance with contract documents, specifications and plans.City of Dora! Ref.: Carlos Arroyo(305)593-6740, Ext.6009. 04/2008—12/2012:PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR-DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT. This $ 9.0 million project consists of the removal and replacement of concrete sidewalks and curb & gutter, installation of new street lighting system, milling & resurfacing, signing and pavement markings, landscaping and stamped cross walks in the Downtown Miami area from Biscayne Blvd. to Miami Avenue and from SE 2nd ST to NE 3rd ST. Directly involved in the Public Information, coordination with business owners,building administrators,Miami Dade Parking Authority.City of Miami Ref.:Onuigbo Valentine,P.E.(305)416-2588. 01/2006—07/2007: SENIOR ROADWAY INSPECTOR—BISCAYNE BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM NE 4TH ST TO NE 13TH ST. FDOT DISTRICT VI. This was a$9.5 million urban reconstruction project with significant roadway construction, new storm water drainage system, including 9 gravity wells and 1 injection well and Pump Station.New signalization(27 drilled shafts for mast arms),street light and irrigation systems as well as landscaping and decorative sidewalk pavement installation. FDOT Ref.: Ivan Hay, P.E.(305)986-1575. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. • • • Florida Department of Transportation's construction Training Qualification ra Pro ngy g Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION t EXPIRATION DATE S62588061 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 II 5/28/2019 S62588061 Geotech Pile Driving Inspection 5/10/2019 S62588061 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 6/18/2019 S62588061 I Management Final Estimates-Level 2 L 7/16/2020 S62588061 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 Obit ' ' ' -'„,''': , - . - -,—, ,: \t-- . 4II 1 3:1'ICI -f -,. A&P Consultin-.--..."7-4-„c,:-.Pr..,K-7g Transportation Engineers,Corp. i'r .r r c T f/ ,,, n # ;y .. .w Mr.Estevez Jr.has over 15 years of combined horizontal and vertical construction ex- perience with the last 18 months working as Contract Inspector for the FDOT District \IV', VI South Dade Maintenance Yard,previous to that, he spent 3 years working on CEI projects for FDOT District 4 and the City of Miami.He also has experience as a e brid t': g . inspector in overseeing repairs to precast segmental bridges in district 4. He has sig- nificant roadway construction experience,and,in addition,has excellent oral and writ- Industry Experience: 15 yrs ten skills. Office Location:Doral, Florida KEY PROJECT EDUCATION Currently enrolled in the 11/2014 TO PRESENT. M.E.I MAINTENANCE/PERMIT INSPECTIONS, FLORIDA Construction Management i DEPARTMENT AR MENT OF TRANSPORTATION,DISTRICT VI School Program of FIU Mr.Estevez duties include,but are not limited to,identifying work needs and generating g 9 9 work estimates,creating the notice to proceed, the contract maintenance work doc- CERTIFICATIONS j ument, and the work out to contractors.As a senior inspector Mr. Estevez monitors TIN No. E231004794100 the work in a QC/QA capacity,checking that the work is compliant with specs and ver- ifying all completed quantities,filling out pay item extensions,monitoring contract bal- CTQP ances and remainingavailable funds , and keeping upwith the allowable time Drilled Shaft Inspection l P� g Intermediate MOT remaining on contracts.Finally,he identifies and/or confirms lighting outages and goes ACI Concrete Field Technician, out a couple of times a month for a lighting survey of the complete lighting system on Level 1 the dot maintained highways Project Length:N/A. Dates Worked: 11/2014 to 4 Concrete Field Technician, Present. Project Contact: Leonard Salazar, PE(305)470-5498. Level 2 A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,CORP.101/2009 to 1112014 CTQP Earthwork Construction M.E.I Maintenance/Permit Inspections,Florida Department of Transportation, District P P Inspection Level 1 -Scheduled 6: Mr. Estevez duties include,but are not limited to, identifyingwork needs and gen- Grouting Certification erating work estimates,creating the notice to proceed,the contract maintenance work Maintenance Rating Program document,and the work out to contractors.As a senior inspector Mr.Estevez monitors (MRP) the work in a QC/QA capacity,checking that the work is compliant with specs and ver- Florida Stormwater, Erosion ifying all completed quantities,filling out pay item extensions,monitoring contract bal- and Sedimentation Control ances and remaining available funds , and keeping up with the allowable time Inspector 1 remaining on contracts.Finally,he identifies and/or confirms lighting outages and goes out a couple of times a month for a lighting survey of the complete lighting system on • the dot maintained highways.Project Length:N/A.Dates Worked: 11/2012 to 11/2014. Project Contact: David Calhoun(954)445-9089. FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE SERVICE PLAZA REPLACEMENT AT POM- PANO BEACH AND WEST PALM BEACH,FL. Working as a Roadway Inspector overseeing construction of the Access Roadways • for the Florida's Turnpike Service Plazas of Pompano Beach and West Palm Beach. Project Length:N/A,Dates Worked:04/2012 to 11/2012. Project Contact:Martin Ben- zaquen, PE(954)547-0017. ......_ „.___-_�_. ._,..___,4._.__ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 4U.. - - , , -,.:. 7. tg. ' '' skv ...:,--., , , . . , . ......, v ...... ,.,., , kit 4 .1.1 0 s ki, 4 0 .,Instil ...".._ - *1 : _ ' -....44 . •s .� . A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. Asi BPI' C'CTE111'7 1-7510 SEGMENTAL BRIDGES REPAIRS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 Served as bridge inspector: Overseeing repairs to precast segmental bridges on the 1-75 corridor at Sawgrass. Construction value is $1,739,000. Responsible for inspection of tendon repairs inside precast segments,grouting of tendons,field documentation and material certification. Duties include inspection of locating post tension tendons cable, Inspection of drilling into tendon duct for future video inspection of grout voids. Inspection of removal of existing blister heads and bush hammering anchors for new pour backs. Inspection of pressurized air testing of ducts and producing still photos and video of existing tendons and charting voids to be grouted.Also responsible for inspection of installation of grout caps,and inspection of grouting operations and grouting of voids in ducts.Assists ProjectAdministrator on documentation of pay items.(FM#411846-1-52-01). Project Length:N/A.Dates Worked:01/2011 to 04/2012 Project Contact:J.Jalali (954)290-4261. DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT,CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI, FL Roadway Inspector-This$4.0 million project consists of the reconstruction of SE/SW 1st and 2nd Streets from Biscayne Blvd to SE 3rd Avenue and NE 1st St, 2nd St and 3rd Streets from Biscayne Blvd to NW 3rd Avenue in the Miami downtown area.The Projects include curb&gutter and sidewalks demolition and replacement,street light installation and milling&resurfacing.Mr.Estevez supervises all con- crete construction,utility relocation,street lighting and milling and resurfacing.Project Length:0.5 mile.Dates Worked:05/2009 to 01/2011 Project Contact:Joe Morffy(954) 369-6883. 1-95 LANDSCAPING PROJECTS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 Inspector's Aide responsible for assisting in landscaping inspection and project close out for the 1-95 landscaping project from Davie Blvd.to the West Palm Beach County line in Broward County Project Length: 30 miles. Dates Worked: 01/2009 to 04/2009. Project Contact: Raul Mederos,(786)295-0909. AGC CONSTRUCTION INC.— AMI FLORIDA111/2007 1 1/2007 to 1 2/2008 CONSTRUCTION\V I Iv' � 11'1VMIAMI , � `/1\IV 1 I 1 1/ V t � � VVV Served as Construction Manager for several residential projects including G2 Residence on 1835 W 27th St(10, 800 sf)and 2555 Lake Avenue(12,000sf) both in Sunset Island II in Miami Beach.Assisted project manager in developing schedule and supervision of all sub contractors. Supervises construction from foundation to finished product. Coordinated inspections by Miami-Dade County.Procured material for all subcontractors. Prepared breakdown for payment,verifies all invoices and recommends payment by owner. Ensured daily quality control of all material deliveries and construction activities taking place. Project Length: N/A. Dates Worked: 11/2007 to 12/2008. Project Contact:Antonio G.Acosta, PE(305)219-4718. ARCHETYPE DISTRIBUTION & LANDSCAPING-MIAMI, FLORIDA 101/2004 to 11/2007 Worked on multiple projects-Prepared site plans,specifications, &cost estimates for land development projects. Coordinated arrangement of existing and proposed land features&structures. Inspected landscape work to ensure compliance with specifications, approved quality of materials&work&advised client&construction personnel. Planned,organized, and coordinated activities of 3-8 workers engaged in landscaping or grounds keeping activities. Planting&maintaining ornamental trees,shrubs,flowers, &lawns. Applying fertilizers, pesticides,and other chemicals,according to contract specifications. Coordinated activities of workers engaged in terracing hillsides, building retaining walls,constructing pathways, installing patios&similar activities in following a landscape design plan. Compiled &analyzed data on conditions such as location,drainage&location of structures for environmental reports& landscaping plans. Inspected completed work to ensure conformance to specifications, standards, &contract requirements. Project Length: N/A. Dates Worked:01/2004 to 11/2007. Project Contact:Self-Employed. .. .._..._, w..�_....�......._,. ....-.. ._�...,...s.._._v._...w.:::,.___.�_- - A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp- 6/21/2016 Qualifications Search E.S) 01111 • • a 1N S Alberto Estevez Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE E23100479 Loeotech ' Drilled Shaft Inspection 4/25/2020 Back 134215 httplivmw.ctgpf'onCa.comlctgp_data'?oe*3q asp7search=E231044794100 1/1 ~ - Al - —*' ' ..,, _ _ ,, _..: a ,_„,_ ..:_ ...... ,..„,,„._ ___ _. ............ . , --- : ..3._ =~ `-• A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. - J U0"' PAGE 1 7 JL. L 4 tkti '-' , i Mr,Perera has worked over the past year in the capacity of CEI Inspector Aide on the District Four I-75 Express Segment C design-build project. Over the past year, he L '' bz.,, was assigned to a Senior Inspector where he has learned all /aspects of the CEI E Inspector's position. He has acquired experience in supervising concrete and earthwork operations, drainage construction particularly pipe backfill,and milling and Industry Experience:2 years resurfacing operations. In addition, he has excellent computer skills. Office Location:Doral, Florida ,EXPERIENCE: EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: , Bachelor in Social Science, Univer- SR-93/0-75 MANAGED LANES,SEGMENT C sit of Habana, Habana,Cuba, 2012 Client: FDOT District IV Y Be in/End Date:to Mar-2016/PRESENT Alliance Francaise de la Habana, Mr. Perera currently serves as Roadway Inspector for this$85.2 Million Design-Build 2010, DELF(Diplome d'etudes de la project which calls for the implementation of Express Lanes along 1-75 from south of Miramar Parkway to South of Sheridan Street. This is one of five projects within this langue francaise) District IV corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade County to 1-595 in CERTIFICATIONS: Broward County. The project calls for constructing, within the existing 166-ft wide median,a four lane divided toll roadway. Project also includes construction of a new TIN#: P660-429-89-010-0 bridge over 1-75 at Pembroke Road and replacement of the existing Miramar Parkway CTQP-As halt PavingTechnician overpass bridge including the total reconstruction of the interchange. p FDOT Contact Person:Antonio Level I Castro, P.E.,Construction Project Manager,(954)448- 2905 CT -QPEarthwork Inspection,Level I CTQP-Final Estimates Level I ' SR-93/1-75 MANAGED LANES,SEGMENT C ' 1 Client: FDOT District IV CTQP-Concrete Specifications AC1—Concrete Field Technician Begin/End Date:Mar-2015/Mar-2016 Level I ' Mr.Perera currently serves as Inspector Aide for this$85.2 Million Design-Build project Advanced MOT(FlU) which calls for the implementation of Express Lanes along 1-75 from south of Miramar Parkes Troxler-Nuclear Gau e Safetyay to South of Sheridan Street.This is one of five projects within this District IV g corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami- Training Dade County to 1-595 in Broward Troxler—HAZMAT Trainin County. The project calls for constructing, within the existing 166-ft wide median, a g four lane divided toll roadway. Project also includes construction Y 1 t uction of a new bridge over 1-75 at Pembroke Road and replacement of the existing Miramar Parkway overpass bridge including the total reconstruction of the interchange. FDOT Contact Person:Antonio Castro,P.E.,Construction Project Manager,(954)448- 2905 CONSTRUCTION OF HIGH-END RESIDENCE, MIAMI Begin/End Date:Aug-2014/Feb-2015 Serving as Supervisor of the entire project. The project consisted of the construction of a new 42,000 S.F. residence, including structural shell, air conditioning, electrical system,new driveway, pool,fence,landscaping,irrigation,etc. The estimated cost of a&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. n- ^.AFP:fir jilt t �' R---. , 77 w ' •L'.: 0 '.". . ' ... .'', .- -: ; ;+ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. ..„,,, incF ; PEPrf" _ .,t u.3.,.. i.the project is$10 million dollars. Contact Person:Antonio Acosta, P.E., President, (305)219-4718 CRESPI BOULEVARD HIGH-TIDE MITIGATION AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT, MIAMI BEACH Client: City of Miami Beach/David Mancini&Sons, Inc.(DMSI) Begin/End Date:Aug-2014/Feb-2015 This project was a design-build project. APCTE was hired by DMSI to provide professional engineering services to design, permit,and 9 inspect proposed new 8" DIP water mains along Crespi Boulevard,stormwater collection system,and stormwater pump station. P DMSI Contact Person:Albert Dominguez, P.E., Project Manager, (786)402-9942 I A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. CrIMIRA7 ..iiiii001111111.111"..."-- • • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction T Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE I, MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION II EXPIRATION DATE P66042989 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 118/1/2019 P66042989 11 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 5/20/2020 P66042989 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 113/17/2020 P66042989 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 10/1/2019 Back 134215 yry •t - ga; : ,. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. ray w sp. i'COW tki A KEY PROJECTS:A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP. 4,4 1 a "fit 03/2016 TO 08/2016:A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,CORP. tkr" :, .N4, ' NW 25TH ST. FROM SR 826 TO NW 89TH COURT I VIADUCT WEST PHASE Industry Experience:4 Years (FDOT FIN: 251185-1-52-01 I 405665-1-52-01) Location: Doral, Florida Client/Contact name/Phone: FDOT District 06/Andres Berisiartu, P.E. / (305) 525- 4976. Role on Project: The construction of this project consists of the widening and EDUCATION: F reconstruction of NW 25th Street, widening the ramps to and from SR 826 and the University,International construction of a 0.6 mile viaduct from NW 82nd Ave to SR 826 constructed over the Miami, FL ' ''tin iization asphalt, westbound lanes of NW 25th Street. Inspector for iignng, sig a Bachelors of Science in Civil Engi- I August 2015, concrete,and bridge painting services.Estimated Construction Cost:$58,500,000.00. neering g g Related Courses: Modeling Applica- tions for Water Resources, GIS, 08/2015 TO 03/2016:A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS,CORP. Highway Capacity,Construction FDOT DESIGN-BUILD PALM BEACH ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 9 Y Management,Transportation&Traf- SYSTEM (ATMS),PHASE III fic Engineering, Project Planning Mr.Alonso serves as Inspector Aide for this $7.9-million project. The CEI contract • involves the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) for Three CERTIFICATIONS: Corridors—SR-817, SR-818, SR-7 in Broward County(FPID No. 431590-1-52-01), CTQP—Asphalt Level I CTQP—Final Estimates Level I the Arterial Dynamic Message Signs (ADMS) and Data Collection Sites along SR- ATSSA Advanced MOT , 80/Southern Blvd from Royal Palm Beach Boulevard to Dixie Highway in Palm Beach County (FPID No. 431591-1-52-01),the Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) on Northlake Boulevard from Military Trail to Federal Highway in Palm Beach County (FPID No. 432883-1-52-01), and the ADMS on Blue Heron Boulevard (east/west approaches to 1-95) and 45th Street(east/west approaches to 1-95) in Palm Beach County (FPID No. 433301-1-52-01), and the ATCS on Okeechobee Boulevard from Tamarind Avenue to Flagler Drive in Palm Beach County(FPID No.433947-1-52-01). FDOT Reference: Donald VanWhervin, P.E., (954)931-6187. 03/2015—08/2015: INGELMO ASSOCIATES,P.A. AutoCAD Drafter: Develop plans, drawings and sketches of structural and civil engineering projects. DECEMBER 2013—MARCH 2015:GRAY DOLPHIN Senior Heavy Equipment Operator:Operate and maintain heavy,motorized equipment used in earth moving and composting operations in a safe and efficient manner. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp, :,Ai,,,,*„..:::-.. -,-, 4 i7 FFG • ,7,1'.' oix.. . - -0,.,,' - -r_ ' +--__ A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. t rEC).A.A n c '.J A i ry_M L U tJ' C.1, itAGE 2/7 012011 —10/2012:CARIBE UTILITIES OF FLORIDA, INC. Foreman: Supervised and directed a storrnwater collection, water supply, wastewater col- lection and road construction crew of 5 employees. Installation of new drainage pipes and structures, asphalt restoration and overlay. Ensured quality control was maintained through-out the project while keeping up with project schedule so that jobs were completed in a timely manner. 01/2009—12/2010:AMERICAN ENGINEERING Pipe Layer: Removal and installation of watermain lines,water services and road con-struction. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. • • . Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications f TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE A45228084 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 II 10/20/2020 A45228084 11 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 I 11/4/2020 A45228084 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 10/30/2020 A45223084 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 yi23i1020 Back 134215 11 Oak , , ili± W/ '~ -0 ._ .,...., . .„11 -. - : --- A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. "'��4 . ' ,i -- (1C 1 1 p �C t r ` r PAGE I/7 * H,L«w U is F t t i =,.,a1.., (111111\ i d Mr. Rufin is an accomplished vertical construction field engineer with significant experience(20)years in Project Management of different types of building structures ,,ilk including shopping centers, hotels and residences. He also has acquired civil/site CEI Transportation exp, A erience construction inspection andp in several roadway construction projects for FOOT, City of Doral and City of Miami Beach. IndustryExperience: 24 Years PROJECT EXPERIENCE P � Office Location:Doral, FL } JAN 2016 — PRESENT: CONVERTING PUBLIX SUPERMARKET TO A NEW EDUCATION: PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET IN BOYNTON BEACH, FL Bachelors of Science in Civil Responsible for coordinating and supervising all improvements needed to make this Engineering, ISPJAE, Havana conversion possible. University, 1987-1992. APR 2015— DEC 2015: NEIGHBORHOOD #1 BISCAYNE POINT FOR CITY OF MIAMI BEACH QUALIFICATIONS: Supervised installation of 1,500 LF of new 8"water main for this neighborhood project 2006, Florida Certified General for the city of Miami Beach including preparation of as builts and responding Contractor No. 1510678. contractor's RFI's and shop drawing submittals. 2012,Home Inspector. HI 6368 JUN.2013—PRESENT: OMAR RODRIGUEZ RESIDENCE CERTIFICATIONS • .Serving as Project Manager of the entire project.The project consist on 42,000 S.F of TIN No.: R15064066-000 I the Living area with all exterior areas(driveway, Pool, Fence,Landscaping,Irrigation, etc. The estimate cost of the project$7.0 million dollars. Contact person: Antonio CTQP Asphalt PavingInspector Acosta(305)-219-4718. p p Level I SEP.2012-JUN.2013: PALMETTO STATION TRACTION POWER SUB-STATION CTQP Asphalt Paving Inspector Level II Serving as Project Manager(Building).The project consists on TPS Building with 14" Nuclear Gauge Safety Training auger cast piles,2400 L.F of duct bank,landscaping, irrigation and site civil.The cost Work Zone Traffic Safety Advanced of the project$1.2 million dollars. Contact person of LK Comstock National Transit, CTQP Earthwork Construction Juan Estrada(770)-312-7889. Inspection Level I CTQP Earthwork Construction I MAR.2012-SEP.2012:NW 9TH STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Inspection Level II CTQP QC Manager Senior Roadway Inspector. This $0.8 million dollar project consisted of milling and resurfacing pavement, signing and marking of the avenues from NW 7th St to NW EXPERIENCE: 11th St and from NW 22nd PL to NW 29th Ave. City of Miami. Contact person: June 2008-Present APCTE Corp. Valentine Onuigbo, P.E(305)-416-2588. MAR. 2011 - MAR. 2012: MARLINS BALLPARK. INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PLASTER Serving as project Manager of the plaster for the entire project(295,000 S.F).Included all interior plaster,exterior ceiling,exterior walls,fascia and elliptical columns(34u).The • cost of the project is$1.5 million dollars.Contact Person of KHHS:Rob Evans(954) -792-2427. Y A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. A. „_,_ , ,i.„m i,,,,:: _,,,- _ _ . , ,..; a ,1; _7---...' _'..' - .Imo . `=�. . — A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. f4_ ,"fir'�,�r • ;,-.i'. iCI IF13 cr. , ktill s i L.• + ,.. JUL.2010-FEB.2011: CANAL BANK STABILIZATION,CITY OF DORAL Serving as Senior Inspector in charge of overseeing construction of year 1 improvements for Canal Stabilization at NW 117th Ave.from NW 25th St to NW 58th St and NW 25th St from 97th Ave to 99th Ave on the City of Doral.The Stabilization consists of implementation of two methods of Canal Stabilization: the Sloping method and the"Stacking" method which require excavation of canal slopes to 1/2:1 slope. This project won the 2012 APWA Florida Chapter Award in the category of$ 10- $25 million. City of Doral Ref: Carlos Arroyo 305.593.6740 DEC.2009-JUN.2010: NW 114TH AVENUE FROM NW 80TH ST TO NW 82ND ST. Senior Roadway Inspector responsible for overseeing the construction of a new 4 lane roadway in a residential neighborhood which included:construction of 800 LF of 20"water main, new concrete curb and sidewalk,new lighting improvements,250 LF of 24"infiltration trench and other drainage improvements, 12"stabilized subgrade,limerock base and asphalt paving. Reference:William Stravers-City of Doral(305)593-6725 MAY 2008-NOV.2008: NW 107TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NW 66TH STREET TO NW 74TH STREET:. Client:City of Doral(Eric Carpenter,P.E.(305)593-6725).Scope of Work:This is a$1.3 million project involving new road-way construction including drainage,e, asphalt paving, utility relocation and street lighting. CEI services and Project Management for the construction of approximately 0.45 mile of a new two-lane road for the north bound of NW 107th Avenue.The project included the removal of unsuitable pp Y material under the future road at 6'-7'depth,and the replacement of this material with embankment,rock base construction and asphalt pavement, roadwaydrainage consisting of catch basins and French Drains,concrete sidewalk construction,traffic separator,signing and pavement markings and street lighting.This particular project was a JPA between the City of Doral and Miami-Dade County.The APCTE Team was responsible for the coordination of two separate designs, which were defined as Phase I and Phase II respectively to be constructed by one con-tractor,preparation and conducing the preconstruction meeting as well as progress meetings,public coordination, constructability re-view analysis, utility relocation coordination with FP&L Transmission and Distributions Divisions,AT&T and Comcast, storm water erosion and sedimentation control to comply with the environmental regulations, control of pay items of work, construction inspection to verify compliance with specifications and plans,Maintenance of Traffic, project documentation management,field changes coordination,work orders analysis and contractor payment application revisions. APR.2004-FEB.2006: WASHINGTON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS FROM 5TH STREET TO 16TH STREET. Client:City of Miami Beach(Albert Dominguez(786)402-9942).Scope of Work:Responsible for overseeing the construction operations, administration, management and quality control of the project.This Project included replacement of the City's water,sewer and drainage systems in a highly visible location. Mr. Rufin was the key coordinator for construction,design and utility conflicts. FEB.2006-MAY 2008: PROJECT MANAGER(BUILDING) Completed as Project Manager, the construction of several multi million dollar building projects. In charge of planning/organizing all Construction activities. Developed schedule and supervised all subcontractors. Procured materials for all subcontractors. Maintained change request log and control changes. Prepare breakdown for payment and payment request back charge control.Conducted weekly subcontractor/vendor coordination meetings. Submitted cash flow report. Coordinated with representative on a daily basis to ensure quality control. Key Examples:les: President Plaza (80,000 SF), Moreno Residence (10,800 SF), Formoso Residence (8,500 SF),Tropical Supermarket (25,000 SF),Acosta Residence(10,000 SF). 11/04—01/06: Project Manager(Building) A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION II-EXPIRATION DATE R15064066 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 7/13/2017 R15064066 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 '11/30/2020 R15064066 Management QC Manager Does Not Expire Back 134215 ENGINEERING Francis Chin, P.E. Fgaric) F• Senior Project Engineer Professional Profile Mr. Chin has more than 47 years of experience (26 years with construction Experience engineering and inspection and 23 years with contractor) on a variety of projects • 47 Years for the Florida Department of Transportation, Metro Dade, Army Corps of Engineers, United States Navy, and private sector clients. His responsibilities have PROFESSIONAL LICENSES: included coordination with FDOT, CE, contractors, cities, utility companies, • Professional Engineer, Florida#34803, 1984 permitting, and maintaining agencies on many highway and bridge projects. He • Certified General Contractor, Florida has been responsible for management engineering of complex road and bridge #CGCO21794, 1982 projects such as the SR 826/SR 836 Interchange,/-595/SR 7 Interchange, the SR • General Engineering,Metra Dade County 826/1-75 Interchange and the Port of Miami (Dodge Bridge and Roadway9 Island) projects. In addition, he has managed several FDOT grouping projects on US 27, EDUCATION: 1-95 in urban Dade County as well as several urban reconstruction projects in • BS, Civil Engineering, University of the West Broward and Palm Beach Counties. Indies, 1970 KEY PROJECT EXPERIENCE EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: • June 2015—Present: August 2016—Current: F&J Engineering Group, Inc. 434922-1-52-01, Tamiami Trail from MP 14.038 to 17.230, Miami-Dade County, • June 1991 —Jun 2015: Florida. FDOT District Six. Senior Inspector for this $70-million-dollar project that AIM Engineering&Surve in , Inc. consist of construction of a western 1.43 mile bridge, an eastern 0.88 mile bridge, g g Y g • July 1985—June 1991: 0.89 miles of bridge approaches and raising the roadway near Everglades Safari Volker Levin Construction, Inc. Additional/ it will remove of the roadwaynorth of both bride o Stevin(ESP). y, 9 and construction of a Stormwater Management System to include ' February 1984—July 1985: openings, g Y Win erten Laboratory, Inc. retention ponds, continuous deflection units, and wetland treatment systems. Wingerter Scope of work includes excavation, embankment, muck removal, • July 1983—January 1984: flexible pavement, drainage, rubble riprap, MSE Walls, temporary and permanent Sterling Prestress, Inc. retainingwalls, and signing and pavement markings. FDOT Project Manager: • December 1979—July 1983: g 9 Jacqueline Sequeira, 305-640-7432 Rapid Transit(RT)Joint Venture a q • June 1978—November 1979: Fortec Constructors, Inc. November 2009 —November 2016: SR 826/SR 836 interchange Design Build ' January 1975—June 1978: Finance, Miami-Dade County, Florida—FDOT District Six.This project includes Modem Civil Engineering&Construction Ltd. the design and construction of 46 bridges with over four million cubic yards of • July 1969—January 1975: g embankment. The 46 bridges consist of 38 Florida I-Beam Concrete, 4 Steel Douglas Pierce Engineers Ltd Girder and 4 Segmental flyover bridges, (32 Category 1 and 14 Category 2 bridges). The project scope includes 4 million cubic yard of embankment,1 million QUALIFICATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS: cubicY and of subsoil (Muck) excavation, 30 miles of concrete pile length • Advanced Maintenance of Traffic (accumulated), 16 miles of drainage pipe, 8,636 tons of reinforcing steel, 180,000 • Final Estimates Level II tons of asphalt, 16 miles of bridge beams, 760,000 square-feet of retaining wall, • Quality Control Manager 35,000 linear feet of guardrail, 5.7 miles of concrete wall separating traffic lanes, • FDOT Critical Structures 783 precast segments and the relocation of the North Line Canal. Mr. Chin serves Construction Issues as Senior Project Engineer and is responsible for overseeing the work on this complex project. FDOT Project Manager: Claudio Diaferia, M.S. ,P.E. 305-986- Affiliations: 9939 • American Concrete Institute,Member • American Concrete Institute,Examiner November 2008 — November 2009: SR 882 (Forest Hill Boulevard) from • Prestressed Concrete Institute Pinehurst Road to 1-95, Palm Beach County, Florida — FDOT District Four. Senior Project Engineer for this urban milling and resurfacing project.The scope of TIN#C500256484230 work included median modifications, widening, ADA improvements to curb ramps and sidewalks, signalization, signing, and landscaping. FOOT Program Manager: J. Beaubrun, 561-432-4966 CJENGINEERING Francis Chin, P.E. Ag F.40►!Li Senior Project Engineer May 2007—July 2008:Two 1-95 (SR 9A) Grouping Projects—from Opa-Locka Boulevard to NW 125th Street and from SR 836 to US 1, Dade County, Florida — FDOT District Six. Senior Project Engineer on two 1-95 grouping projects which involved the widening of three bridges between Opa-Locka Boulevard to NW 125th Street with on and off ramps improvements.The construction of new and replacement of damaged concrete pavement slabs and general improvements on 1-95 from SR 836 to US 1 passing through the busiest section of downtown Miami. The widening project included storm drainage, Intelligent Transportation Systems fiber optic relocation, drill shaft, foundations, concrete columns, concrete bridges, MSE walls, cast-in-place walls with soldier piles and soil anchors, rigid pavement on mainline,and flexible pavement on ramps. FDOT Project Manager:Ivan Hay, PE 305-650-0016 November 2002—July 2007: Seven Grouping Projects—SR 809 (Military Trail), SR 708 (Blue Heron Boulevard), and SR 710 (Beeline Highway), Palm Beach, Florida — FDOT District Four. Senior Project Engineer for three urban reconstruction projects which involved widening from four lanes to six lanes on SR 809 and SR 708; three widening, milling, resurfacing, and bridge replacement projects on SR 710;and the design build Blue Heron BoulevardNeterans Affairs Hospital Office/Warehouse project.The reconstruction projects included complex MOT, extensive urban utility relocation,JPA utility agreement,storm drainage,signalization, overhead sign structures, landscaping and sound walls. The widening and resurfacing projects included a bridge replacement, a new bridge, signalization, widening, overbuild, milling, and resurfacing. The bridges were 81 feet long cast in place flat slab with three spans. Work also included 18" piling, pier caps, end bents, canal widening and slope protection using articulated blocks. Combined project lengths encompass approximately 12.8 miles. FDOT Design Project Manager:Jose Velarde 954-777-4677, Bing Wang 954- 717-2254 and Fausto Gomez, 954-777-4466. FDOT Project Manager:J. Beaubrun, 561-432-4966 February 2001 — November 2002: SR 817 (University Drive), Broward County, Florida — FDOT District Four. Senior Project Engineer on this busy urban project which has intense businesses as well as residences along the corridor in Plantation. Project involved widening, milling and resurfacing to change the roadway profile and cross slope, drainage lighting, signalization extensive drainage, curb and gutter, signalization, overhead sign structures and other general improvements to SR 817 from south of Broward Boulevard to the C-13 Canal approximately 2.5 miles. FDOT Program Manager:E. Jalali, 954-958-7642 June 1998—January 2001: SR 7(US 441), Broward County, Florida—FDOT District Four. Resident Project Engineer on the SR 7 (US 441) urban reconstruction of four lanes to six lanes approximately 2.25 miles from south of Riverland Road to Broward Boulevard. This project runs through a high density business area, as well as sensitive residential developments along Riverland Road and Melrose Park. FDOT Program Manager:E. Jalali, 954-958-7642 May 1995 — June 1998: Two Grouping Projects — SR 811 (Dixie Highway), Broward County, Florida — FDOT District Four. Resident Project Engineer for these two simultaneous urban contracts on Dixie Highway which involved urban reconstruction from Hammondsville Road to Copans Road and from Copans Road to Hillsboro Boulevard. Combined project lengths encompassed approximately six miles with four railroad crossing reconstruction. FDOT Program Manager:Rudy Batz, 954-776-4300 January 1992 — May 1995: Three Grouping Projects — US 27 (SR 25), Palm Beach County, Florida — FDOT District Four. Resident Project Engineer responsible for engineering and construction management of three US 27 projects. Work included reconstruction of 2 lanes to four lanes parallel to major canal, coordination with the FDOT, contractors, utility companies, cities, farmers, and permitting agencies overall project administration. Combined project lengths encompassed approximately 14 miles. FDOT Program Manager:Jim Houck. FDOT Resident Engineer:Mark Croft, Deborah Ihsan(WP Ops), 954-410-1694 August 1989 —June 1991: Port of Miami (Dodge Island) Bridge & Roadway, Miami-Dade County, Florida. This project included the construction of two double cell segmental bridges each approximately 6,000 feet in length, 24-inch piles, substructure caps, columns and the Rehab of existing Bascule Bridge. Mr.Chin served as the Project Engineer responsible for the initial set-up of Quality Control and Geometry Control of the casting yard, scheduling and supervising the field construction activities involving concrete plant production, specialized lifting equipments, Engineering on all aspects of the construction including substructure, casting and erection of segments, post-tensioning,grouting of tendons,and finishing. May 1986—August 1989: I-595/US 441 (SR 7) Interchange, Broward County, Florida—FDOT District Four.This project included 3.1 million cubic yards of embankment fill, 19 new bridges - 15 convention AASHTO concrete bridges which their lengths varied from approximately 120 feet to approximately 170 feet, 2 steel girder bridges approximately 200 feet in length and two segmental bridges. Mr. Chin served as the SPE responsible for scheduling and Quality Control of all aspects of the bridge construction from pile driving to finish. As SPE, Mr. Chin was also responsible for scheduling, utility coordination, supervising the field activities involving specialized lifting equipment, Quality Control, geometry control, on all aspects of the precast and erection operations including concrete, rebar , post tensioning,grouting of tendons and finishing for tvvo segmental bridges each approximately 2,000 ft long. o 3/2(/2017 Qualifications Search ` • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search ...........,................._________...... , ,.. ... ,... , Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP L:IUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE C50025648 Management 1 Final Estimates-Level 1 6/5/2020 f Back 134215 http://www.ctgpflorida.com/ctgp data/xxxyy23q.asp?search=C500256484230 1/1 ENGINEERING Hemberth Salazar, P.E. COProject Administrator II out Professional Profile Industry Experience 12 Years Mr. Salazar is an accomplished Project Administrator,who has acquired significant experience both as a Contract Support Specialist and Quality Control PROFESSIONAL LICENSES: Manager. He has years of experience working as a Senior Roadway/Bridge • Professional Engineer, #82547 Inspector supervising concrete and earthwork operations,drainage construction particularly pipe backfill and milling and resurfacing operations in more than fifteen EDUCATION: FDOT Projects. Mr. Salazar also serves as CEI Operations Engineer • BS in Civil Engineering,FIU,Miami, responsible for marketing support,training of CEI and QC staff,oversight of Florida, 2012. (Graduated Summa Cum radioactive license and supervision of overall CEI field operations activities. Laude)Civil Engineering(AA),Miami Dade College KEY PROJECT EXPERIENCE APCTE, MIAMI, FLORIDA QUALIFICATIONSICERTIFICATIONS: 5/2016 TO 10/2016. FDOT DISTRICT 4-SR-93/1-75 Managed Lanes, Segment C. • FDOT Construction Academy 2013(1st Mr. Salazar served as Senior Bridge Inspector in this$85.2 Million Design-Build place award) project calls for the implementation of express-lane along 1-75 from south of Miramar • FDOT Maintenance Rating Program Parkway to South of Sheridan Street.This is one of five projects within this District IV • FDOT Critical Structures Construction corridor that runs from NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade County to 1-75 in Miami-Dade Issues FDOT LIMS&Site Manager County,The project calls for construction within the existing 166-ft wide median a • FDOT Materials Acceptance&Certification four lane divided toll road. Project also includes construction of a new bridge over 1- System(MAC) 75 at Pembroke Road and replacement of the existing Miramar Parkway overpass • FDOT Project Management bridge including the total reconstruction of the interchange. Contact Name: FDOT • FDOT Concrete Specifications Dist.4/Antonio Castro,P.E. (954)448-2905. p FDOT Auger Cast Pile •Infrastructure Modifications for Open Road FDOT MSE Wall Inspection 08/2014 TO 08/2016. MDX SR-836p I served as Senior RoadwayInspector/Assistant PA for • CTQP Asphalt Paving Technician,Level Tolling (ORT). Mr. Salazar p Million Design-Build Miami-Dade Expressway AuthorityORT 1&2 CTQP Earthwork Const. Inspection, this $12.6 g p y SR-836. MDX is in theprocess to transitioningall corridors to Level 1&2 CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection conversion project in ORT. Thegoal of this project is toprovide the infrastructure necessaryto convert the • CTQP Pile Driving Inspection SR-836 between NW 137th Avenue and SR-826 to an Open Road Facility. The • CTQP Quality Control Manager project includes the construction of 5 new toll gantry structures and modification to • CTQP Final Estimates,Level 1&2 P J three currently existing in the SR-836 corridor. In addition construction of an exit • ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician, ramp from SR-836 west bound to access the FDOT District VI Office is also part of Level I ACI Concrete Transportation Const. this contract. MDX Contact Name: David Chang(305)265-5492. Inspector Troxier Nuclear Gauge Safety Training Troxler Radioactive Safety Officer 06/2014 TO 08/2014. CENTER GROVE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. • PTI Unbanded Post Tensioning Inspection Project Administrator / CSS / Senior Roadway Inspector. This $1.1 million project HU Florida Advanced MOT consisted of new drainage exfiltration trenches installation, milling and resurfacing, • SSPC Bridge Coating Inspector, Grade I sidewalk reconstruction and pavement striping from US-1 to Grand Ave. and from Florida Stormwater,Erosion and SW 27th Ave.to SW 32nd Ave. City of Miami Ref: Maurice Hardy, (305)416-1786. Sedimentation Control Inspection • IMSA Traffic Signal Level 1 &2 09/13 to 05/2014. TRAFFIC SIGNAL HANGER RETROFIT FOR FDOT D4. Served as Senior Roadway/Signal Inspector overseeing the retrofit of traffic signal hangers TIN No.S42632077-000 in over 100 signalized intersections all around Broward County as part of the Traffic Signal Inspection Staff in the FDOT Broward County Operations Center. FDOT Contact:Tim Butler(954)868-7232. 06/13 to 08/13. NW 25 ST. FROM NW 89TH CT.TO SR 826 I VIADUCT FROM NW 82ND AVE TO EAST OF SR 826. (FDOT FIN: 251185-1-52-01 /405665-1- 52-01) Assisting as Senior Bridge Inspector on the project for construction of the superstructure of the West Bound Viaduct Bridge from NW 78Av. to just East of NW 82 Ave. The construction of this project consists of the widening and reconstruction of NW 25th St with included the construction of a 24' x 15' structural plate culvert with a length of 2870 LF. It also include the construction of a viaduct bridge from NW 82nd Ave to just connecting to a previously constructed portion of the viaduct on the East side of the Palmetto Expressway. The viaduct is constructed of prestressed concrete pile foundation with GIP concrete ENGINEERING 1 Hemberth Salazar, P.E. Project Administrator ,-,. FlineloCF)71 footing and columns. 96"dia.drilled shaft foundation.Steel box girder"straddle bent cap"and then eight(8)lines steel I beam girders are erected and a 8.5"deck slab constructed. FDOT Contact name: Dari Vorce, 305-640-7412. 11/12 to 05/13. MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING INSPECTION (MEI), Contract for FDOT DISTRICT VI. Senior Contract Inspector responsible for Construction Engineering and Inspection of multiple Maintenance Contracts related to concrete, asphalt and fencing projects working out of the North Dade Maintenance Office. Responsible for preparation and tracking of all project documentation and inspection daily reports to deliver each maintenance contract to completion as required by FDOT procedures. FDOT Reference: Skip Bechtold(305) 601-7155. 04/11 -12/12. HENRY KINNEY TUNNEL CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM. Assigned to this D4 FDOT hybrid project as CEI Contract Support Specialist l Senior Inspector. Project includes concrete spall repairs, structural steel rebar installation, expansion joints repair and a new Cathodic Protection System. FDOT Contact: Hewrald Humes, PE. (954)734-3827 06/10 — 04/11. NW 25TH STREET VIADUCT. Roadway I Bridge Senior Inspector responsible for inspecting and documenting the contractor's daily activities on site, materials sampling and testing, lab test results, documentation of quantities, material certifications, and field documentation of daily construction activities (SiteManager and LIMS). Mr. Salazar was heavily involved in the the storm drainage, French drain, and culvert installations spanning the entire project from NW 67th Ave to SR 826. FDOT Ref. District 6/ Dari Vorce/(305)640-7412. 07/09 — 06/10. FDOT D6 SR 916 (NW 135TH STIOPA-LOCKA BLVD) FROM NW 47TH AVE THRU NW 30TH AVE (LENGTH OF PROJECT: 1.691 MILES) Mr. Salazar served as CEI Senior Roadway Inspector responsible for the supervision of all construction inspections such as concrete and asphalt paving activities related to milling and resurfacing of Opa-Locka Blvd (NW 135th St), in charge of the inspection of Drilled Shaft Operation for new Mast Arms installation, all Signalization activities, installation of new controllers and service, ADA compliance, paving marking, supervision and revision of monthly project cost estimates, responsible for checking engineering computations, as well as field testing of construction materials being incorporated into the project, is responsible for documentation of all roadway construction activities in an electronic daily construction report on Site Manager(Database System). FDOT Contact:Jackie Sequeira, P.E. (305) 640-7400/Ivan Hay, P.E.(305) 986-2575 01/09 —06/09. SPECIAL CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST FOR MIC TERMINAL ACCESS ROADWAY FIN NO. 249937-4-52- 01 FDOT D6.Assigned as Contract Support Specialist to finalize material certification and final estimate submittal for GMP No. 2 group of projects of the Miami Intermodal Center (MIC). Responsible for compiling all relevant project documentation obtaining materials certification and resolving all LIMS issues. FDOT Contact: Mario Cabrera, P. E, (305)216-4962; Isa Nunez, P.E. (305)986-2551 03/08—12/08. FDOT D6 SR 973(GALLOWAY RD.)FROM SW 41ST ST THRU SW 96TH ST(LENGTH OF PROJECT: 3.5 MILES)- Mr. Salazar served as CEI Senior Inspector responsible for the supervision of all asphalt paving activities related to milling and resurfacing of Galloway Road (87th Ave), supervision and revision of monthly project cost estimates, responsible for checking engineering computations, and construction inspections, as well as field testing of construction materials being incorporated into the project, was responsible for documentation of all roadway construction activities in an electronic daily construction report on Site Manager (Database System). Also completed preparation and submittal of all Final Estimate documents including final asphalt pavement report,documentation and quantity determination. FDOT Contact: Mario Cabrera, PE,(305)216-4962 11/07—03/08. FDOT D4 SR 838(SUNRISE BOULEVARD)@ SR 7 SIDEWALK PROJECT NEXT TO THE"SFWMD CANAL C-12" IN BROWARD COUNTY. CEI Senior Roadway Inspector responsible for overseeing the construction operations and documentation of all roadway construction activities in a daily construction report, sidewalk, pedestrian/bicycle railing, lighting, riprap fabric formed concrete to stabilized canal C-12 at Sunrise Blvd, concrete report, and density log book, including but not limited to inspection of earthwork, drainage, signalization, highway lighting, asphalt paving, and Sand Cement Rip-Rap operations. Also construction of a removable metal sidewalk spam over existing utilities, sheet piles, concrete cap, barrier wall, pipe, endwall and signs. FDOT Contact: Donald VanWhervin, P. E, (954) 677-7016 09/07 — 11/07. FDOT D4 SR 84 @ SR 817 (UNIVERSITY DR.) INTERSECTION IN BROWARD COUNTY. CB Senior Roadway Inspector responsible for overseeing the construction operations of all roadway construction activities,including but not limited to inspection of earthwork, drainage, concrete, signalization, striping, highway lighting and asphalt paving. FDOT Contact: Donald VanWhervin, P. E, (954) 677-7016 3/20/2017 Qualifications Search FM 1::1 (II:)Wr ) 7: • z • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search ......,...................._________......., ..............__..........,........ ____________,................._........,....,.........._______.,.........,,..._,.....,....._______. ............. ....____ „......_ .______ . _____...........„„..,..„„_..........,..... ............... a. LQualifications 1 ______ _____ _ ._.___________. _________ ILLRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP LQUAL1FICATION 1 XPIRATION DATE 1 S42632077 Asphalt :: Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 5/3/2021 1 .........................._, 12.42632077 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 '5/3/2021 i S42632077 Concrete I Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 1/30/2021 [ 42632077_____ Concrete 11 Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 - 1/30/2021 I S42632077 Earthwork I Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 1 6/12/2020 l 11142632077 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 2/24/2021 S42632077 ' Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection liza0_17___ j S42632077 Geotech i Pile Driving Inspection 15/21/2018 1 t42.6_,=_:'Management Final Estimates-Level 1 12/2/2021 j[ 2632077 - Management Final Estimates-Level 2 11:1222.02:1___ i 1 S42632077Management 119.92anagerii Does Not Expire Back 134215 httpi/www.ctqpflorida.com/ctqp_databooryy23q.asp?search=S42632077-000 1/1 C)F__ ENGINEERING Juan Calle Roadway Inspector Professional Profile Years of Experience:40+ Mr. Calle has over 40 years of experience in CEI related projects serving as a Lead Inspector and Inspector. He has experience preforming material Employment History: acceptance and verification testing for concrete, asphalt and soils compaction, 07/2016—Current nuclear density testing, signalization, earthwork inspection, MOT inspection, F&J Engineering Group, Inc. concrete placement, asphalt milling and paving, pollution controls monitoring, 2015—Jul 2016 contract compliance and project documentation. His vast experience with Carnahan-Proctor and Cross Asphalt, Earthwork and Concrete sampling and testing will play a vital role to 2014-2015 the success of any project he serves on. SAI Consulting Engineers 2013 A Squared Group, Inc. Relevant Project Experience 2007-2012 July 2016 — Current, R1229508P1, Broward County, Inspector. CSA Group, Inc. R1229508P1 for Pine Island Rd. from Nova Dr./SW 24th St. to SR-84/1- 2002-2006 595. Widening to six lane divided roadway, drainage improvements, ADA T.C.R.C. HerzogMashington Group. improvements, adding bicycle lanes and new sidewalks, landscaping and 2000-2002 irrigation improvements and new mast arm signalized intersections HCED Delta Consulting Engineers Project Manager: Manuel Fontan: 954.577.4654 1988-2000 PTG Consulting Services 3/2016—July 2016: US-1 from Broward Blvd.to NE 17 Way. Inspector for this Qualifications/Certifications: project involves milling and resurfacing the existing 6-lane divided urban roadway, to extend its service life, along SR-5/US 1 from Broward Blvd (MP • CTQP Earthwork Construction 0.000) to NE 17TH Way (MP 1.830) in Broward County. The project also has Level I&II drainage, ADA improvements for the entire project length, 26' drill shafts for • CTQP Asphalt As hart Paving Level I Mast arms, highway signing and pavement markings, sidewalks, traffic signals • CTQP Asphalt Paving Level II and other incidental construction on SR 5. Mr. Calle is tasked with drill shaft • CTQP CT P Concrete Field Inspectionection I inspection, concrete sidewalks, lighting, signals, milling and resurfacing,and ail • CTQP Final Estimate Level I and II material certifications. Christian Roias, P.E. FDOT D4 954.931.6182 • Troxier Nuclear Density Certification FIN. 24994115201/24994155201. Sr. Inspector for this $40 Million dollar • ACI Concrete Field Testing Level 1 grouping that is composed of total reconstruction of SR 823/ NW 57th Ave., a • MOT Advanced six lane divided roadway, that includes milling &resurfacing, 300 new drainage • Florida Stormwater, Erosion,and structures, guardrail, signing, pavement markings, signalization, bridge Sedimentation widening, over 2 miles of channel excavation, 499,000 sf of sheet piling, pile • CSX Roadway Worker Protection driving and landscaping on NW 57th Ave.,from W. 23rd Street to W.46th St. and • CTQP QC Manager W 46th Street. to W 53rd St. The Grouping included three JPA's, two with • FDOT Critical Structures Miami Dade Water and Sewer and one with the City of Hialeah and also had • FDOT Project Engineer School two Cost Saving Initiatives that had a total savings of over$3 Million Dollars. Responsible for all project documentation including progress estimates, final Expertise&Technical Specialties: estimates,supplemental agreements,work orders,CSI, as-built plans,time file, multiline earthwork,weather letters, material certification and providing support • Sitemanager to the Sr. Project Engineer and Project Administrator on project issues. FOOT Laboratory Information PM Amanda Shotton, P.E. 786-350-0445 Management System Roadway inspector, US-27 in Davenport, Florida, widening of the roadway • Microsoft Office including the bridge over US-192, reviewing the testing and inspection of the • ERS Plot Graphs for Log Books Quality Control inspectors for the contractor. The work also includes the relocation and installation of new utility services that are in conflict with the new TIN# C40042348 roadway design. Sr. Building Inspector— Reviewing the submittals of the items for the proposed replacement of the Rest Area building and the Collier County Safety Building on 1-75 at Mile Marker 63, reviewing the testing and inspection of the Quality Control inspectors for the contractor. Client FOOT, Ref: Daniel Menendez, 305-297-3600 Sr. Inspector— Street Light Replacement on SR Al A at Fort Lauderdale, Fl., inspected the removal and disposal of existing streets lights to be replaced with turtle friendly lights, due to its location special care had to be taken with regards to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and lowering the impact on the business in the area. Client: City of Fort Lauderdale. o 2011 — 2011: Sr. Inspector- $ 1 Billion Port of Miami Tunnel — Did the verification inspection on Dodge Island, relocation of existing roadways, building of temporary roadways as needed for the construction of the tunnel, utilities, including drainage, water mains, sewer mains, electrical, telephone and fiber optic cables. Client: Port of Miami. Ref: Victor Ortiz, 786-566-8035. o 2007— 2009: Sr. Inspector- $ 62M road widening project for Collier County: Santa Barbara Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes and upgrading the water lines, storm sewer and widening of two bridges. On site mining for construction materials, retention ponds, replacement and upgrading of the traffic signals to mast arm, roadway lighting and the installation of fiber optic cable; landscaping including sodding, seed & mulch, ornamental trees, and brick pavers. Project was completed on schedule and on budget. Ref.: Tad Piuc, Project Manager for Collier County Transportation Management 239-253-2885 o 2006—2007: Project Administrator—$22M road widening project for Collier County, FL: Immokalee Road from 1-75 to Collier Boulevard from 4 lanes to six lanes, with a pedestrian bridge alongside a nature preserve to replace an existing bridge over the adjacent canal. Project Administrator— Recoating with Class V the existing bridges, barrier wall and MSE walls for the MDX system. Ref.: Orlando Sanchez(GEC) 305.265.5844 Sr. Bridge Inspector— Miami Mover for the Miami Airport connecting the terminal to the Rental Car Center via a elevated dual track 1.25 mile long elevated people mover system — Placement of foundations, concrete columns & piers, pre-stressed beams and bridge decks. Ref.: Steve Black, 954-445-2040 Sr. Bridge Inspector and Office Administrator for Quality Control Dept. $350M construction for the double tracking of the Tri-Rail in West Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties. The following bridges were replaced or upgraded while still maintaining full active rail transit with CSX, Amtrak and Tri-rail railroads: C-16 Canal, C-51 Canal, C-15 Canal, E-4 South Canal, E-4 North Canal, Lake Ida Canal, and C-10 South & C-10 North Canal, Used Prolog Document Control System software.-Ref.: Mr. Buddy Hudson, Quality Control Manager, PMC Quality Assurance Manager at 954-444-9890. Sr. Bridge and Roadway Inspector — $20M FDOT Turnpike project. Widening and resurfacing from 4 to 6 lanes, from Boca Raton Interchange to the Delray Reach Interchange, Palm Beach County, Fl. The project included replacement of the bridge for the exit ramp over the Turnpike and the removal and replacement the bridge over Clint Moore Road where a temporary Bailey Bridge was used to maintain the use of the Turnpike during the construction of the new bridge and the widening of the bridge over a canal. FDOT contact: Mr. Bill Sears, Project Manager. 954.975.4855 Bridge Inspector— $15M to double track the Tri-Rail service corridor in the north end of Broward County, FL including the removal of the existing bridge and the building of twin bridges across the Hillsboro Canal. Participated in change order negotiations with the project engineer for several supplemental agreements. Additional work history upon request. 3/20/2017 Qualifications Search FM E) C::11.71‘k ) . ' • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search .. . . • •..,..................,,,,,,..,.....___........, ,....,.....,..,..„.......,......_..............____ ___........____,,.... •__,..,.......„...,......._.............., Qualifications • TRAINEE 1 MATERIAL GROUP 4 QUALIFICATION ��L _ 1 EXPIRATION DATE C40042348 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 i 4/3/2019 C40042348 i Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 j 4/3/2019 C40042348 i Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 1/27/2019 040042348 I Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 1 4/17/2017 C40042348 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Leve•l 2 '; 8/13/2021 _I• C40042348 1 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 1 5/15/2017 C40042348 ; Management Final Estimates-Level 2 ' 5/15/2017 I C40042348 i Management , QC Manager II Does Not Expire II j Back 134215 http://www.ctqpfiorida.com/ctgp data/xxxyy23q.asp?search=C40042348 1/1 E NSG I N E E R I N G Corey A. Kazaks (.) F► Inspector Professional Profile Mr. Corey Kazaks has nine years of experience in civil road and bridge construction Years of Experience:9 servicing various FDOT roadway projects in Districts 4 and 6 as a CEI roadway inspector, quality coordinator, and construction services manager. Mr. Kazaks has a Education strong inspection background with extensive experience in quality management of A.A. General Studies, Palm Beach asphalt, soils, concrete materials, drilled shafts, and final estimates, especially as Community College,2008 related to FDOT compliance. He has performed and assisted in many project-related duties, including but not limited to the Materials Acceptance and Certification System Employment Histo • (MAC), processing monthly and final estimates, monthly materials certification, History: June 2015—Present: processing construction contract changes, CMT technician management and F&J Engineering Group, Inc. coordination, and geotechnical report drafting. Mr. Kazaks recently began performing asphalt plant verification and independent verification duties for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise and FDOT both directly and as a second-tier subconsultant, and is fully Expertise&Technical Specialties: certified and equipped to handle plant laboratory testing, plant verification inspection, p P and various roadway construction inspections and monitoring. • 30 Hours OSHA Safety Training • NPDES Stormwater Inspector Project Experience • NSC Workzone Traffic Control, Feb 2017 - Current: Hillsboro Boulevard from Military Trail to US 1, Deerfield Advanced Level Beach, FL. Corey serves as an Inspector for this $9.4 Mil project that consist of • Nuclear Gauge Safety Training improving the off-ramp from northbound 1-95 to eastbound Hillsboro Boulevard • Hazmat Certification including adding a new signalized intersection and adding second lane to increase • CTQP QC Manager capacity, relocating and upgrading drainage structures, upgrading crosswalk ramps to • CTQP Final Estimates Level 1 meet ADA requirements, constructing new stamped asphalt crosswalks from east of and 2 Natura Boulevard to US 1, upgrading existing pedestrian signals to countdown timers, • CTQP Asphalt Plant Level 1 and upgrading signalized intersections to mast arms, installing new decorative lighting, 2 constructing new medians east of SE 2 Avenue, removing old asphalt and resurfacing • CTQP Asphalt Paving Level 1 the roadway, and upgrading signs and pavement markings. FDOT PM, Yveins Jean- • CTQP Earthwork Construction Pierre, P.E., (954)914-0293 Inspection Level 1 • ACI—Field Concrete Testing September 2014—February 2017 . i Geotechnical Services Contract,D4 Materials&Research Office, Technician FOOT District 4 C o $1.5AMEC Environmental &Infrastructure. Construction • CTQP Concrete Level 1 •Davie, Florida, million, Manager. The District 4 Geotechnical Services Contract is a task order Critical Structures Construction Services Issues—Self Study Course based continuing services agreement with a contract value of approximately $1.5 million, intended to last approximately 5 years, ending in November 2018. There has been over 30 out of 84 task work orders authorized to date which consisted of pavement coringservices along1-95 and various other types of roadways in District 4. TIN: K220f01870260 Responsibilities include task order proposal estimating and generation, preparation of MOT plans, coordination with Public Information Officers and county Traffic Operations/Management Centers, coordination with Florida Highway Patrol for night-time operations, acting as Worksite Traffic Supervisor during fieldwork, coordinating and managing MOT and FHP sub-consultants, collecting and analysing pavement, base, and subgrade data for field review and pavement condition survey, drafting final pavement reports for engineer's sign & seal prior to distribution, utilizing Department resources for reviewing available roadway segment information and entering pavement data into PCR mainframe. References: FOOT Assistant Geotechnical Engineer Matthew Gisondi, PE, 954.677.7038, FDOT District 4 Geotechnical Specialist Terrance Walters, 954.677.7019, District Manager Pavement Material Theresa Gunter, 954.677.7021, Bituminous Material Consultant Scott A.Cushing, 954.677.7005. • University Drive, Broward County,Florida, FPID No.:431756-1. Date: September 2014; Length of Corridor:Approximately 2 miles; Schedule: Estimated 2 days—completed on time. • SR 76/Kanner Highway, Broward County, Florida,FPID No.434275-1. Date: November 2014; Length of Corridor Approximately 1.25 miles;Schedule: Estimated 2 days—completed on time. • 1-95 and CR 708, MP 0 to MP 7.89, Martin County, Florida, FPID No.: 434273-1. Date: June 2015; Length of Corridor:Approximately 7.89 miles; Schedule: Estimated 3 days—completed on time. FamIENGINEERING Corey A. Kazaks A „ 4:30 U F› Inspector 1-95 and SR 706, MP 43.975 to MP 46.018, Palm Beach County, Florida, FPID No.:434273-2. Date:June 2015; Length of Corridor:Approximately 3 miles; Schedule: Estimated 3 days—completed on time. 1-95 and Glades Road, Palm Beach County, Florida, FPID No.412420-4. Date:August 2015; Length of Corridor:Approximately 2 miles;Schedule: Estimated 3 days—completed in 2 days. 1-595 Express Corridor Roadway Improvements, PPP Project, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 04/2013 to 08/2014, $1.2 billion, Dragados USA. QA/QC Coordinator. The 1-595 Express Corridor improvements Project consisted of the reconstruction of the 1-595 mainline and all associated improvements to frontage roads and ramps from the I-75/Sawgrass Expressway interchange to the I- 595/1-95 interchange, for a total project length along 1-595 of approximately 10.5 miles and a design and construction cost of approximately$1.2 billion. Coordinated regularly with partners and subcontractors and coordinated a team of qualified individuals who were responsible for all QA/QC activities such as inspections,tests, and ensuring the sampling of materials was performed in a timely manner and in compliance with FDOT Specifications. Reviewed material certifications, installation processes, and repair procedures. Reference: Construction Quality Manager Tomas Almonte, P.E., 786.348.9975 HEFT All Electronic Tolling Phase 1 and 2 Design-Build, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Miami-Dade County, Florida,02/2011 to 08/2011, $63 million, BCC Engineering. CEI Inspector. Roadway Inspector for the conversion to All Electronic Toll (AET) collection of the four Mainline Toll Plazas at Bird Road, Homestead, Okeechobee Road,and Miramar plus the 26 ramp toll plazas on the 47-mile long Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike. Duties included daily reporting, inspection, and monitoring of drilled shaft foundations, toll equipment gantry structures, overhead and cantilevered sign structures, conduit installation, mainline widening, milling and resurfacing operations, coordinating lane closures with FTE Traffic Management Center during all lane closures, entering daily construction reports into Site Manager Construction Program, scheduling the CQC and verification tests and inputting the information into the LIMS materials database, payment of quantities for monthly and final estimates. Project included two Design I Build Construction Contracts totalling $63 million. Turnpike Enterprise Contact Person: Mr. Mario Rojas. (954) 975-4855, mario.rojas@dot.state.fl.us. 20th Avenue from Oslo Road to SR 60, Florida Department of Transportation District 4, Indian River County,Florida, 06/2010 to 0212011, $2.1 million, BCC Engineering. CEI Inspector. Inspection and documentation of contractor's activities on the milling and resurfacing of 20th Avenue from Oslo Road to SR 60, including the installation of mast arm signals at five intersections and pedestrian ramps with detectable warning surfaces. The project was a $2.1-million construction contract with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act(ARRA)funding.Contact: Elisabeth Jett, FDOT 4 Treasure Coast, (772)489-7128. SR 5/U.S. 1 from Young Circle North to South of Sheridan Street, Florida Department of Transportation District 4, Broward County, Florida, 04/2009 to 06/2010, BCC Engineering. CEI Inspector. Inspection and documentation of contractors activities on the milling and resurfacing of approximately 1.6 miles of SR 5/U.S. 1 from Young Circle (Hollywood Boulevard) to just south of Sheridan Street. The resurfacing operations replaced the existing deficient friction course and extended into all of the intersecting roadways. Median widening operations increased turn lane capacity and limited drainage construction will improve existing system. Signalized intersections throughout the project received countdown pedestrian signals with detectors. Existing pedestrian ramps throughout the project were replaced with new American with Disabilities-compliant pedestrian ramps and brick pavers to improve the aesthetics of the intersections. Other improvements included limited sidewalk replacement, landscape, irrigation, and pavement markings. FDOT, District 4,Contact: Mr.Tony Piedra(954)868-5215 SR 817 (University Drive)from C-14 Canal to SR 834 (Sample Road), Florida Department of Transportation District 4, Broward County, Florida, 04/2008 to 04/2009, $8 million, BCC Engineering. CEI Inspector. Inspection and documentation of contractor's activities on the 3-mile-long milling and resurfacing of University Drive. Project included the milling and resurfacing of asphalt friction and structural courses, demolition and replacement of the existing traffic railing on the bridge over the C-14 canal, new signalization at the intersections of Atlantic Boulevard and Riverside Drive (including drilled shaft construction and steel mast arm assemblies), and installation of new highway lighting assemblies and conduit throughout the project. The project also included installation of new concrete sidewalks with ADA-compliant ramps, curb and gutter, pavement markings, and signage. Responsibilities included the inspection of contractor and subcontractor construction activities, documentation (including Daily Reports of Construction), and MOT inspections. Client: FDOT, District 4,Contact: Mr. Eghbal (Jay)Jalali (954)958-7641 3/20/2017 Qualifications Search FDD1 :11:1111T11 ,,,, , ,_,,,,,-- ..,,,,,, • • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program ............_______..........._.....„............................_....................................................._.........__ Qualifications Search ... ________..............................._............................_.................___• ...................______..............._ _ .......... ......._....................____,................_...,.. , _......_,......_............_,.................„........,_______ .......... .,_..................,______,....• Qualifications • TRAINEE 1LLIIATER_J...........?_AL ROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE 1 , 152010187 ilzksphaft Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 11 4/1.81022 ..............1 K22010187 Asphalt i Aspinician-L12,121L12/9/2020 ....- ....................1 K22010187 ii.. alt 1 Asphalt Plant Technician-Level 2 [32..26/2021 .... 11(32010187 j Concrete C12,2crei2211Technician-Level 1 1111/19/2021 ............... .'"7:7__ '.... -- - ' 1E2010187 Earthwork i[E21thwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 1E1/2021 I 1 I 11<22010187 Management 1 Fiirlal!stimates-Level 1 ib/2020 ..........................,.... [K22010187 Management . Final Estimates-Level 2 1_6./5/2020 ..... 1K22010187 Management [QCManager IDoes Not Expire 1 Back 134215 http://www.ctqpflorida.com/ctqp data/xxxyy23q.asp?search=1Q20101870260 1/1 1 , ENGINEERING Gary Soubel II v= ! Roadway Inspector Professional Profile Years of Experience: 10+ Mr. Soubel has 10+ years of experience in CEI related projects serving as a Employment Histo • Lead Inspector and Inspector. He has experience preforming material History: acceptance and verification testing for concrete, asphalt and soils • 6/2014—current: compaction, nuclear density testing,signalization,earthwork inspection, MOT F&J Engineering Group, Inc. inspection, concrete placement, asphalt milling and paving, pollution controls g g monitoring, contract compliance and project documentation. His vast • 2f2014—512014 g p BCC Engineering experience with Asphalt, Earthwork and Concrete sampling and testing will • 2/2011 —2f2014: play a vital role to the success of any project he serves on. Field expertise, Calvin Giordano&AssociatesInc. coupled with exceptional problem solving ability enabled Gary to meet and exceed all client needs and expectations in the field. • 3/2006-2/2011: p Tally Engineering, INC Relevant Project Experience Qualifications/Certifications: December 2016 — Current, R1229508P1, Broward County, Inspector. Inspector for Broward County Highway Construction and Engineering • CTQP Earthwork Construction Division (HOED) widening and reconstruction of Wiles Road from four to six Level I&II lanes from Rock Island Road to State Road 7. Project consists of roadway , CTQP Asphalt Paving Level I widening, median reconstruction, sidewalk and bike lane construction, • CTQP Asphalt Paving Level II asphalt overbuild, replacement of existing strain pole signals with mast arms, • CTQP Concrete Field Inspection I directional boring of lighting conduit, modification to existing drainage as well • CTQP Final Estimate Level as installation of new drainage. HOED Project Manager: Manuel Fontan: • CTQP Drill Shaft 954.577.4654 • Troxler Nuclear Density August 2016 — Current, R1177105P1, Broward County, Sr. Signal Certification Inspector. Project consist of improvements to 4 intersections: Dykes Rd. & • ACI Concrete Field Testing Level 1 SW 29th St., Taft St. and Park Ave., Sheridan St. and Palm Ave., and Pine • MOT Advanced Island and Sunset Strip. Improvements consist of new mast arms, • Florida Stormwater, Erosion,and pedestrian detectors, asphalt, sidewalk, ADA ramp upgrades, directional Sedimentation boring, and pavement markings throughout the project. Senior Project - IMSA Signal Inspector Engineer, Peter Medico, P.E.954.533.7319 • CSX Roadway Worker Protection January 2015—Aug 2016, Andrews Ave. Ext. from Pompano Park PI. to S. of Atlantic Blvd. ($3.7 M), Inspector. Project consist of reconstruction of Expertise&Technical Specialties: Andrews Avenue between SW 3rd. Street/Race Track Road/Pompano Park Place/John Knox Village Blvd and SR 814/Atlantic Boulevard. Other • Sitemanager improvements will include new curb and gutter, an improved drainage • Laboratory Information system, street lighting, bike lanes, sidewalks/ramps at intersections to comply Management System with Americans with Disabilities Act standards, pavement markings signals, • Microsoft Office landscape and updated signs. Mr. Soubel is in charge of inspecting all milling , ERS Plot Graphs for Log Books and resurfacing, sidewalk and ADA ramp upgrades, new signals, and pavement markings throughout the project. Mr. Soubel coordinated with all TIN# S140296830590 QC technicians and Contractor project personal to problem solve and schedule work efforts. He was the point of contact for the field for all VT inspections on asphalt, sidewalk, ADA ramp upgrades, directional boring, and pavement markings throughout the project. His duties also include keeping track of the quantities, recording dailies in Sitemanager, checking MOT, inspecting and collecting samples for earthwork, lighting, signalization,asphalt and striping. FDOT PM,Angela Lietz, P.E.,954.940.7523 June 2014 — January 2015, SR 870- Commercial Blvd. from West of White Oak Ln. to East of NW 49th Ave. ($1.2 M), Inspector. Project consisting of milling and resurfacing, sidewalk and ADA ramp upgrades, new street lighting, and pavement markings on Commercial Boulevard. Mr. Soubel was the lead inspector in charge of inspecting all milling and resurfacing,sidewalk and ADA ramp upgrades, new street lighting, and pavement markings throughout the project. Mr. Soubel coordinated with all QC technicians and Contractor project personal to problem solve and schedule work efforts. He was the point of contact for the field for all VT inspections on asphalt, sidewalk, ADA ramp upgrades, directional boring, and pavement markings throughout the project. His duties also include keeping track of the quantities, recording dailies in Sitemanager, checking MOT, inspecting and collecting samples for earthwork, lighting, signalization, asphalt and striping. FDOT PM, Donald VanWhervin, P.E., 954.958.7654 February 2014 — May 2014, FDOT South Dade Permit Office, Senior Inspector. Worked on the MEI Maintenance and permit inspection contract for South Miami-Dade. Mr Soubel would receive permits, coordinate with all parties letting them know that the permit was approved. He also coordinated pre-construction meetings and went over all the documentation needed to close out permits and reviewed the FDOT standards. Additionally he reviewed utility permits that came in and recommended approval. Mr Soubel's other duties included going out to the projects to layout work zones and investigated if there were any conflicts with the permit documents and the work site. He then summarized comments and pictures on the online database to be approved. When permitted ready to work, Mr. Soubel then was incharge of monitoring and inspecting the field placement of all structural fill material pipe-backfill, sub-grade, and base rock. Monitor the placement of all structural concrete including drilled shaft, (for Mass Arms and Cantilever Signs). FDOT PM, George Delalloval,305.640.7246 Feb 2011 — Feb 2014, I-595/SR-84/Express lanes, 1595 Express Corridor Improvement ($1.25 B), Roadway Inspector for P3 Project. Calvin, Giordano & Associates (CGA) was part of the team that was selected as the Concessionaire's Construction, Engineering and Inspection (CEI) consultant for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) $1.25 billion 1-595 Express Lanes PPP (Public/Private/Partnership). This Project consisted of 5 construction segments and 2 greenway sections. Mr. Soubel was in charge of monitoring and inspecting the field placement of all structural fill material including sampling and material testing of embankment, pipe-backfill, sub-grade, MSE retaining wall system and base rock and inspection of Rebar. Monitor sample and test the placement of all structural concrete including drilled shaft, (for Mass Arms and Cantilever Signs) Reference: HNTB Scott Case, P.E., 954.661.7576; FDOT PM, Paul Lampley, P.E., 954.777.4201. March 2006 — Feb 2011, SR9 (1-95) Palm Beach Lakes Blvd to Blue Heron Blvd., Project #: 231920-1-52-01, Sr. QC Inspector. The project consisted of five miles of widening and constructing of six new lanes extending the existing interstate 1-95 to a ten lane highway. Reconstruction consists of removing and reconstructing 3-bridges, 6-mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall system, approximately two miles of cast in place retaining wall, and signalization. Mr. Soubel was in charge of monitoring and inspecting the field placement of all structural fill material including sampling and material testing of embankment, pipe-backfill, sub-grade, MSE retaining wall system and base rock. Monitor sample and test the placement of all structural concrete including drilled shaft, (for Mass Arms and Cantilever Signs). FDOT Representative: Charles Simpkiss, 954.677.7100 3/20/2017 Qualifications Search . Fil ID CiliZillilik; max- * ;, Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program ._________________________•_________________________________________________..._______________• _________________________________________________________________________________________ Qualifications Search ._., . .... ....._ .............................______........„,,....................,.....___. ..................,.......,•• 1. Qualifications rEELGROUP FICATIONEXRATION DATE ,. ' S14029683 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 3/26/2019 !14029683 Asphalt AsphaltPaving Technician-Level 2 3/26/2019 Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 7/20/2021 1.114_0/918.2_ Concrete Ls:142.2222. 1[Earthwork Earthwork Constnaction Inspection-Level 1 1/28/2022 l a i S4029683 Earthwork tEarthwok Construction Inspection-Level 2 122.2219 iY at...... ..... ____sv � j[Geotech 7/19/2018 __________i 029683 Drilled Shaft Inspection LL i s !14029683 Management Final Estimates-Level 1 11/6/2017 7 Back 134215 http://www.ctgpflorida.corn/ctgp_data/xxxyy23q.asp?search=S140296830590 1/1 NEW MILLENNIUM Ali Hassanpour ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Senior Inspector Education : Years of Experience: 17 Bachelor of Science—Construction Engineering Florida International University Tin No: H251010482-000 Certifications FDOT-CTQP Asphalt Paving Technician Levels I&II ACI Field Testing Technician Grade I FDOT-CTQP Concrete Field Technician Level I &II FDEP Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control FDTO-CTQP Earthwork Const. Inspection Levels I & II Inspector FDOT-CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection Troxler Nuclear Gauge Safety FDOT-CTQP Pile Driving Inspection Surface Moisture Nuclear Density Gauge Technician FDOT-CTQP Final Estimates Level I Work Zone Safety Specialist(IMSA) FDOT Intermediate MOT Concrete Field inspector specification Course Level 1 ACI Conc.Transportation Const. Inspector FDOT Construction Claims Seminar PROJECT EXPERIENCE 02/14-03/16: 1-75 Express Lanes Segment A&B Senior Inspector Responsible for monitoring contractors temporary MOT, HML, C&G, De-mucking and backfilling as well as drainage work along 1-75 and Turnpike extension,The Project features a new 4 lane tolled facility in the 1-75 median between 170thST, in Miami Dade county and Miramar Parkway in Broward County. Project Includes ingress and egress connecting ramps,sound walls,drainage and integrated ITS tolling system. 03/14—07/14: 1-95 Bridge Repair FIN No.432549-9-52-01 Senior Roadway Inspector The scope of work consisted of setting up MOT devices, surface preparation, spall repair, and installation of two component multi-layer E-bond 526 epoxy rapid set, Hi friction, skid resistance polymer overlay on section of 1-95 Bridge N-S bound 6 lanes each direction and 6th Ave. on-off ramp between Lantana Road and 10th Avenue in Palm Beach County. 04/12 —03/14: I-95/SR-9, from Okeechobee Rd. to South of SR-614 (Indrio Rd) FIN No. 413046-1-52.01 Senior Inspector This 9- mile widening project in St. Lucie County had 5 bridges for reconstruction, milling and resurfacing of existing lanes, signage and signalization improvement, upgrading the bridges and interchanges at each end of project. Project included adding two inside lanes in each direction on 1-95, Milling and resurfacing of existing lanes, signage and signalization improvement, upgrading the Bridges and interchanges at each end of project 04/11 —08/11: Military Trail from Clint Moore Road to Lake Worth Road FIN No. 426377-1-52-01 Senior Inspector Responsible for the inspection of the re-construction of sidewalk,ADA compliance ramps as well as milling and resurfacing and striping of 14 miles of roadway. 06/10 — 11/10: SR 1-75 Interchange Bridges (10 Bridges) & SR-838/Sunrise Blvd Bridge Senior Inspector Contract consists of repair and epoxy overlay of ten concrete box girder segmental bridges at the 1-75 / 1-595 Saw grass Expressway Interchange and Sunrise Blvd. I was part of inspection team in charge of bridge deck repairs on 1-75 consisting of cleaning, sealing and injecting epoxy into segment joints, removing expansion joint devices and replacing with a type II Polymer(two component epoxy mortar),and applying epoxy overlay on the entire roadway deck of all ten bridges, and documentation acceptance bond strength testing. The traffic was controlled with staged work activities and partial lane shifts allowing the continuous flow of vehicles through the work areas. 02106—02/10: Florida's Turnpike between Sunrise and Atlantic Blvd. FIN No.406975-1-52-01 Senior Inspector Project consisted of widening of the Florida Turnpike's mainlines from six lanes to ten lanes in Broward County. Construction involved two new major bridges and widening of three existing bridges and modification of existing toll plazas, as well as off-on ramps connected to the highway,also construction of sound wall and permanent barrier wall. 05/04 — 10/05: SR 933 (NW 12th Ave from 16th St. to 29th St) Senior Inspector responsible for the asphalt paving, earthwork inspection, daily reports density and concrete testing, reinforcing steel inspection, reported and organized field measurement and site source document to produce monthly and final estimate.This project involved milling and resurfacing, lighting, signalization and modification of sidewalks, curb ramps as well as landscaping in median. 4868 SW 72nd Avenue, Miami,Florida 33155—Phone 30 .667.4772— Fax 30 .667.1790—www.nmdceng.com Ali Hassanpour Senior Inspector 09/03 — 05/04: SR 922 (NW-NE 135th St) from 27th Ave to 31st Ave. Senior Inspector This project included earthwork, asphalt, drainage, utilities, signalization, lighting, signing as pavement marking, curb and gutter as well as construction of curb inlets. FDOT Project Managers: Isa 02/03—09/03: SR 997 (NW 177/Krome Avenue) Senior Inspector The project involved the reconstruction of the shoulders'sub grade on both sides of Krome Ave.and milling and resurfacing the roadway along with both shoulders. FDOT 01/02 — 02103: Miami River Dredging Project FIN No. 412657-1-52-01 Senior Inspector Responsibilities involved monitoring and recording excavation activity to avoid interference with manatees' movement, as well as construction of electrical cabinets inside the control room, and testing the River's water twice a day for high turbidity that would affect the life of endangered species. This Project consisted of submarine cable replacement between Flagler bridge and 27th Ave Bridge, project included installation of two new submarine power and control cable at six designated bridge locations to make dredging of the Miami River possible by the US Army Corps of Engineers. 02/01 — 12/01: SR AMA, Commercial Boulevard FIN No. 227951-152-01 Senior Inspector Responsible for inspection, testing and reporting for drainage, asphalt paving, concrete, and lighting and signalization operation. This project involved widening, milling and resurfacing,drainage lighting,signalization, brick pavers,crosswalks,and landscaping. 07/00 — 11/00: SR5/US1 FIN No. 250584-1-52-01 Senior Inspector responsible for daily monitoring of all roadway construction activities, the asphalt base inspection, soil and asphalt density testing, concrete testing, drainage pipe placement, completed daily reports, asphalt inspection and reports This project consisted of the reconstruction of six miles of existing roadway drainage installation, including French drain,lighting,signalization, signing, landscaping and installation of a new irrigation system. • 0111%.01.14.1.%111111. Page 2of2 3/21/2017 Qualifications Search Fli /::1 CWalt‘II ) • s e ..ddia.didia.01010111111111111111.1111.11111111"""-- Florida Department of Transpotation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search 1r Qualifications _ ______ TRAINEE I MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION 'EXPIRATION DATE k25101O48 [ ph&t [Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 14/30/2020 1 H25101048 LA.2 phalt [Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 E 4/30/2020 tAsphalt H25101048 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 5/17/2019 H25101048 Concrete ` Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 l( 7/2019 1 =25101048 .........._.,..................1 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 2/11/2019 E ...L.. ..............._____ H25101048 [Earthwork i[ /ork_Construction Inspection-Level 2 3/5/2019 H25101048 1 Geotech i[9illed Shaft Inspection ', 8/2/2017 H25101048 Geotech 1 Pile Driving Inspection L8/12/2020 H25101048 : Managementi Final Estimates-Level 1 ii 10/27/2021 Back 134215 http://ctgpflorida.com/ctgp datahocxyy23q.asp?search=H251010482 1/1 044110 NEW Okikarokk MILLENNIUM Manuel Quesada ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Senior Inspector Education: Years of Experience: 13 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Central University,Santa Clara,Cuba TIN No.: Q23055052-000 Certifications: FDOT-CTQP Asphalt Paving Levels I &II FDOT Critical Structure Construction Issues(Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Concrete Field Technician Levels I &II FDOT—ATSSA Intermediate MOT FDOT-CTQP Earthwork Const. Inspection Levels I&II IMSA Traffic Signal Level 1 FDOT-CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection NHI Safety Inspection of in Service Bridges FDOT-CTQP Pile Driving Inspection ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade I FDOT-CTQP Final Estimates Levels I &II ACI Concrete Transportation Construction Inspector(CTCI) FDOT-CTQP Q.C. Manager Troxler Nuclear Radiation Safety Certified FDOT MSE Walls&Auger Cast Piles(Self-Study) FDEP-FL Stormwater, Erosion&Sed. Control Insp PROJECT EXPERIENCE: 12/16 - Present: Indian Creek Bridge Rehabilitation, Miami-Dade County, FL. Senior Bridge Inspector Rehabilitation of the historical 367-foot bridge has 13 spans of reinforced arched concrete tee-beams. This project required the application of carbon reinforced polymers to the beams and columns,concrete repairs, milling/resurfacing roadway and bridge deck, utility relocations, minor electrical, expansion joint replacement, and cleaning and painting. Supervise contractors and all the subcontractors on proposed rehabilitations. 9/16 - 12/16: Venetian Bridges No 874474 & No. 874481 Rehabilitation, Miami-Dade County, FL. Senior Bridge Inspector Work under this contract consisted of the rehabilitation of the Venetian Causeway Bascule bridges and was assisting for the inspection of all concrete deck repairs. 7/13 — 4/15: SR-9/Bridge over New River, FIN 423914-1-52-01 Senior Bridge Inspector Accountable for all bridge rehabilitation operations on this$18 Million project, including steel inspection platform system and miscellaneous structural steel rehabilitation items. 9/15—06/16: 1-75 Ramp Widening to Southbound SR 826, FIN 425478-1-52-01 Senior Bridge Inspector Applicable FDOT Work Categories: 10.1, 10.3, 10.4. Accountable for all bridge operations on this$7 Million project, including, substructure and superstructure widening,pile driving and retaining walls. 11/08 — 08/11: MDX 87404 Killian Parkway Interchange Reconstruction and SR-874 Widening Senior Bridge Inspector - Applicable FDOT Work Categories: 10.1, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5.1, 10.5.2. $62 Million project entails widening, resurfacing and drainage improvements to over 3 miles of roadway and the new alignment and reconstruction of the Killian Parkway Interchange with steel plate girders spanning 400 feet over open traffic lanes. The project includes coordination and construction over the CSX railroad corridor, construction over the C-100 SFWMD canal,canal dredging and the construction of over 2 miles of 20'concrete sound barrier walls. 03/07—10/08:SR 874 on Ramp from North Kendall Drive Senior Bridge Inspector— Applicable FDOT Work Categories: 10.1, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5.2. This$32-million project consists of the construction of a new 2,200 foot, 11-span steel bridge from North Kendall Drive to Northbound SR-874. Misc. structures inspection performed for retaining walls, sound walls, pier walls, overhead sign structures, MSE walls and mast arms. Lead field bridge inspection duties including girder erection &fastener torque analysis, coordinated with project engineers and contractors, performed QC/QA verification inspection, prepared daily reports of construction, maintained logs for concrete and soil samples, and managed all bridge inspectors. 08/04— 03107: SR 836 Extension from NW 137th Av. to E. of NW 107th Av. & 137th Ave. from SW 9th St. to NW 12th St. Senior Bridge Inspector-Applicable FDOT Work Categories: 10.1, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5.2. Lead all bridge inspection teams on this $161-million four-mile limited access project. Construction materials inspection performed for concrete and bituminous components. Major bridge inspection performed for steel bridges & miscellaneous structures inspection performed for retaining walls, bulkhead structures, pier walls,overhead sign structures, MSE walls,sound walls and concrete culverts. 4868 SW 72nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33155—Phone 30 .667.4772 — Fax 30 .667.1790—www.nmdceng.corn 3/21/2017 Qualifications Search Fiill ri) ail;::::llillIlli .0‘4110.11111.; 11.1°111.1 Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program _..,......._....._..._....*r.V•*Sn..*..W......••••••+ ...r.",.....,•••+*•............,r.,..•r•............... .*...........nrr.....'err,..,...,,....,..,....renr.,r......................,.....-rrer............,....”.....*....*,....r...*......rrrn.ra,..••••••., ..........,••••••••,.........._ Qualifications Search , __....._ 1,......_____ Qualifications ,__.._...,.. ____ _.__....... l:riR___ATTE MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION , EXPIR_A219111)f __I _ .... , Ii Q23055052 i Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 I 6/16/2021 i ........-1 .......____. ,.........................., 1323055052 Asphalt Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 6/16/2021 ,[9,2,3055052 , Concrete tErcrete Field Technician-Level 1 L1?/..111n9 Q23055052 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 i 10/11/2019 la23055052 Earthwork [Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 1....!/.2./2019 _ , .._.._.....___....._ . # [9132..!5052 1 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 . 2/24/2021 i 1221055052 Geotech DriJIllf....._iafOlspeclio2____ ! 3/31/2021 ..,.....,„__,......,......._ 13.210...510...!!_ '[..922!!)....c11L'He Driving Inspection , !1=18 _............_ -it _ Q23055052 1 Management tinal Estimates-Level 1 1,2/13/2018 ... -..._............t. _...........,.... -- L913055052 ;[. rt 1 Final Estimates-Level 2 ,122_11/2018 1223055052 AiLln_agement [QC Manager Does Not Expire ...._.......................______. Back 134215 http://ctqpflorida.com/ctqp_databooryy23q.asp?search=q23055052 1/1 NEW 00%0010%°"41°. MILLENNIUM Nader Salour ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED Senior Inspector Education: Years of Experience:34 Florida International University, 1983 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineer TIN No.:S46062054-000 Miami Dade Community College, 1981 Associate in Arts Pre-Engineering Certifications: FDOT-CTQP Asphalt Paving Technician Levels I &II IMSA Traffic Signal Inspector Level I FDOT-CTQP Concrete Field Technician Level I &II FDEP-Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector FDOT-CTQP Earthwork Construction Levels I&II Earthwork Inspection (Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection Contract Plan Reading (Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Final Estimates Level I Construction Math (Self-Study) FDOT Intermediate MOT Installation of Traffic Signalization System (Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP MSE Wall&Augercast Piles(Self-Study) Concrete Testing and Inspection (Self-Study) FDOT-Critical Structure Construction Issues(Self-Study) Roadway Subgrade and Base Inspection (Self-Study) Troxler Nuclear Gauge Technician Installation of Roadway Lighting System(Self-Study) ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade 1 Foundations Testing and Installation (Self-Study) ACI Conc.Transportation Const. Inspector Roadway Density Testing and Inspection (Self-Study) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 11/15—Present: SR8261I-75 Express Lanes Design Build Project FPN Nos.: 432687-1-52-01, 432687-1-52-04, 432687-2-52-01, 432687-1-56-01, 430795-1-52-01 & 430795-1-52-02 Senior Inspector Project Cost: $244M. This project consists of the implementation of tolled express lanes along the SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from Flagler Street to NW 154 Street and along 1-75 from SR 826/Palmetto Expressway to NW 170 Street in Miami-Dade County (MDC). The project is approximately 13 miles in length and will provide continuity to the 1-75 Express Lanes project currently under development by FDOT District 4 from NW 170 St. in MDC to 1-595 in Broward County. Tolled express lanes will be incorporated along the corridor with widening of the SR826/Palmetto Expressway mainline. 1-75 express lanes will be constructed in the median and the project will be within the existing right-of-way. Extensive CEI experience assisting in project related duties such as LIMS, SiteManager, progress and final estimates, processing construction contract changes. 2014—11/15: Broward Operations General CEI Consultant Construction Support Senior Inspector Responsible for miscellaneous inspection services on an as needed basis, performing highly complex technical assignments in field surveying and construction layout, making, and checking engineering computations, inspecting construction work, and conducting field tests and responsible for coordinating and managing the lower level inspectors.. The Broward Operations CEI Consultant Construction Support Staff Contract will consist of work assignments administered under a task work order-type contract. • 430196-1-52.01 -SR-838/Sunrise Blvd at NW 24th Avenue. The improvements under this contract consist of the extension of the westbound left turn to accommodate the peak hour vehicle demand. Project also entails installation of overhead and ground mounted school flashers, new mast arm installations, and signal upgrades. 2012 — 2014: Widening of West Atlantic Avenue — FIN No. 229658-3-52-01 from W. of Lyons Road to Starkey Road SR-806 - Senior Inspector—The$5.3 million LAP Contract widens Atlantic Avenue from Starkey Road to West of Lyons Road from a 2 lane rural section to a 4 lane urban section. This work is to be accomplished through significant utility relocation, canal relocation, and extensive water main/ drainage work & mast arm installations. Responsible for overseeing/monitoring all earthwork operations, drainage installation, asphalt placement, subgrade operations, base construction, guardrail, seed and mulch, sodding, permanent striping, lighting, signalization and numerous aspects of bridge operations including pile driving, drilled shaft reinforcing & concrete formwork and concrete placement. 2008 — 2010: MEI Maintenance & Permit Inspection_Senior Inspector- Responsible for inspection of permits for the Florida Department of Transportation North-Dade Maintenance. Responsible for inspecting permits issued to entities and individuals such as -1868 SW 72"`' Avenue, Miami, Florida 33155—Phone 305.667.4772 —Fax 30 .667.1790—www.nmdceng.com Resume Nader Salour Senior Inspector developers, homeowners, and local authorities to allow these agencies or patrons to work inside or adjacent to State Roads. Conduct meetings for pre-construction with applicant filing for a particular type of work;work for the Department in explaining and executing prepared procedures under Chapter 14 of the Florida Administrative Code. Responsible for inspecting all type of applications such as the opening of new connections to a State Road (driveways, side streets, etc), drainage, landscaping placement, utility installations,special events and banners,as well as other special permits. 2006 — 2009: NW 63rd Street Causeway Bascule Bridge Replacement Project, District VI Senior Inspector- This major bridge replacement project included the replacement of 12" water main installed per FDOT and WASD standards. The project involved in coordination with WASD for the installation of the water main. Also Responsible for maintaining and updating all job progress files. Recording and payment of all pay items and quantities. Inputting all QA/QC&contractor field testing results in the FDOT CQR system. 2006 — 2008: 14th Street Bascule Bridge Project, Broward County, Florida District IV Senior Inspector - This major bridge replacement project included the replacement of 18"water mains installed using open cut and subaqueous horizontal directional bore methods per FDOT and WASD standards. Responsible for the inspection and documentation of road, bridge and Toll Plaza construction. Project involved coordination with WASD for the installation of the watermain. Organize FDOT engineering inspections, and field office services for the Various Enhancement Project in District IV. Also Responsible for maintaining and updating all job progress files. Recording and payment of all pay items and quantities. Inputting all QA/QC & contractor field testing results in the FDOT CQR system. 2005—2006: Reconstruction of Dixie Highway(SR-805)from 10th Avenue North to Arlington Senior Inspector-Reconstruction of Dixie Highway (SR 805) from 10th Avenue North to Arlington. Assigned to road earthwork operations, storm sewer installation, subgrade operations, base and asphalt placement, guardrail, striping, street lighting and signalization and landscape per FDOT and WASD standards. 2002 — 2005: US 1 (Biscayne Boulevard) Roadway Construction Project. Sr. Roadway/Bridge Inspector - $11 million urban roadway construction project, US 1 (Biscayne Boulevard). This project involves the demolition, reconstruction and expansion of two concrete bridges and expansion of 2 miles of roadway. Roadway duties include; installation of traffic signalization system, concrete testing and inspection, roadway subgrade and base inspection, installation of roadway lighting system, foundations testing and installation, roadway and drainage inspection and density testing. 2005—2008: 63rd St. Bascule Bridge Rehabilitation FIN Nos.: 249940-1-52-01,249940-1-52-02,407935-1-52-01 Senior Roadway Inspector- Project cost: $14M. This major bridge replacement project included the replacement of 12"water mains installed per FDOT and WASD standards. The project involved in coordination with WASD for the installation of the water main. Roadway portion of the project scope included utility relocation and coordination with the City of Miami Beach for new drainage installation,new asphalt paving, and signalization installation. Bridge portion of project scope included structural, mechanical, and electrical components as well as specialty bridge items. 1990—1995: INTERCOUNTY LABORATORIES,INC. Concrete Field Testing Technician - Responsibilities included concrete sampling, density inspection, proctor, soil boring, excavation, backfilling, augercast pile, pile driving and load testing. 1987—1990:JAMMAL AND ASSOCIATES Engineering Technician - My responsibilities included: Inspection and testing (laboratory and field) of construction materials. Prior to being employed by Jammal and Associates, I served as a Quality Control Inspector for Superior Metal Products of Orlando, FL. 11%.11. 10.%1100% Paw 2 of 2 3/21/2017 Qualifications Search f , a ..wiligoillillill.1111111."1""*— . Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search ........_..........,._ f Qualifications TRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP 1 QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE S46062054 1 Asphalt 1As_p_halt Paving Technician-Level 1 [9/26/2021 1 c , ill,..6062054 1 Asphalt , Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 9/30/2021 [S46062054 1 Concrete I Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 1/15/2020 1 i....�-a_..n:s�Y�m_..��.,�.. ....�.=a.-.R..._h .�:,.�...,.�.� ,�....� � ..m.. �.........n_.e,�.�.�_ ....:.,4........__...�.__. ...�._..-..-...mai [46062054 a ' Concrete �` Concrete Field Technician-Level 2 -� - 1/15/2020 S46062054 i Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 9/10/2020 S46062054 1 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 �- - �j 4/28/2021 ����� 4 1 S46062054 Geotech t Drilled Shaft Inspection 7/25/2019 [s4600s4 [rI1anagement 1. Final Estimates-Level 1 10/11/2021 Back 134215 http://ctopflorida.com/ctqp_data/xxxyy23q.asp?search=S46062054 1/1 NEW .41rmtado% MILLENNIUM Waldo Garcia ENGINEERING. INCORPORATED Inspector Education: Years of Experience: 5 IPU CAP Roberto Rodriguez High School, Santa Clara,Cuba, 1989 TIN No.: G625880722-000 Bachelor Degree in Education Instituto Superior Pedagogico Felix Varela, Santa Clara,Cuba, 1999 Certifications: FDOT CTQP Earthwork Construction Inspection Levels I &II ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade I FDOT CTQP Concrete Field Testing Technician Level I ACI Concrete Strength Technician FDOT Auger Cast Pile Inspection (Self-Study) Troxier Nuclear Safety Certification FDOT MSE Wall Inspection(Self-Study) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 8/14- Present: Reconstruction of I-75/Express Managed Lanes Segment E from the 1-595 Interchange to North of Griffin Road Roadway Quality Control Inspector Project Cost: $75M. This Design/Build project includes construction of 4.7 miles of the existing median on 1-75 adding four (4) new lanes of toll roadway with ingress & egress ramps, drainage system, toll gantries & equipment buildings, new ITS system, construction of a direct connect bridge to the 1-595 Express Lanes, MSE walls, signing and pavement markings, lighting, sound walls & landscaping. His responsibilities include performing quality control on concrete pours and earthwork activities by testing and sampling in compliance with FDOT Specifications. Inspect finished subgrade and roadway base, MSE walls, density testing on storm sewer pipes and structures, documentation of roadway construction activities and ensure that all roadway materials are properly tested, sampled and certified. Responsible for the Density Records Log Book. 12/11 —08/14: 1-595 Express Corridor Improvement P3 Project Roadway►1101JCutor Project Cost: $13M. This project consisted of roadway inspections along the 10 miles corridor of 1-595 installation of drainage system, construction of MSE walls, auger cast piles, sound walls, micro-tunneling, utility relocations, inspection of maintenance of traffic, drilled shafts, lighting and landscaping. His responsibilities included performing bridge inspections, quality control on concrete pours by testing and sampling in compliance with FDOT Specifications. Interacted with general contractors and subcontractors; sent daily reports to the Project Owner describing quantities of material used and wasted; earthwork, density testing on embankments, subgrades and bases. Inspected finished bases, MSE walls,density testing on storm sewer pipes and structures. Handled the Density Records Log Book. 4868 SW 72nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33155—Phone 30 .667.4772—Fax 30 .667.1790—www.nmdceng.com lilinillillinililiNESOMMift 3122/2017 Qualifications Search FDD • • • Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications TRAINEE If MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION , EXPIRATION DATE ':G62588072 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 : 5/2/2019 062588072 1 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 : 8/21/2019 '12_62588072 r Earthwork i Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 9/29/2019 062588072 :[Management ' Final Estimates-Level 1 12/12/2021 Back 1 134215 httplictopifordacomtctep dataixxxyy23q.asp?search=G625880722 In NEW00***00/0•"11•04% MILLENNIUM Joseph A. Clermont, E.I. ENGINEERING_ INCORPORATED Inspector Education: Years of Experience:6 B.S. Civil Engineering Florida International University,2007 Tin No.: C465481770-000 Professional Registration: Engineer Intern#1100012833 Certifications: FDOT-CTQP Asphalt Paving Technician Level I &II FDOT MSE Wall&Auger Cast Piles(Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Concrete Field Technician Level I FDOT Critical Structures Construction Issues(Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Earthwork Const. Inspection Levels I &II FDOT Intermediate MOT FDOT-CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade I FDOT-CTQP Pile Driving Inspection Troxler Nuclear Radiation Safety Certified FDOT-CTQP Final Estimates Level I FDEP-Florida Stormwater, Erosion&Sed.Control Insp. PROJECT EXPERIENCE: 02/2016 to Present: SR826/I-75 Express Lanes Design Build Project FPN Nos.: 432687-1-52-01,432687-1-52-04, 432687-2-52- 01, 432687-1-56-01, 430795-1-52-01 & 430795-1-52-02 Inspector Aide — Project Cost: $244M. This project consists of the implementation of tolled express lanes along the SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from Flagler Street to NW 154 Street and along 1-75 from SR 826/Palmetto Expressway to NW 170 Street in Miami-Dade County (MDC). The project is approximately 13 miles in length and will provide continuity to the 1-75 Express Lanes project currently under development by FDOT District 4 from NW 170 St. in MDC to 1-595 in Broward County. Tolled express lanes will be incorporated along the corridor with widening of the SR826/Palmetto Expressway mainline. 1-75 express lanes will be constructed in the median and the project will be within the existing right-of-way. Responsible for performing assignments in assisting project Senior Inspectors, daily activities. MOT counting and inspection,delivering of materials to the Lab, measuring of areas and simple area calculations. 01/16 — Present: 1-95 Express Lanes (Phase 2) FIN No. 422796-1-52-01 Inspector Project Cost: $112M. This 2-year Design-Build ARRA funded project is the second leg of the successful Managed Lanes concept on 1-95. This project includes many complex components, including but not limited to: 12 miles of roadway widening on 1-95, ITS installation for tolling and traffic monitoring systems, Power Distribution System, Turnpike Infrastructure installation (4 toll gantries and hub buildings), numerous cantilever and truss sign structures, traffic control devices for express lanes, drainage, asphalt resurfacing and overbuild, earthwork, bridge widening (concrete and steel structures), as well as major modifications and widening at the Ives Dairy Road and 1-95 Interchange. This project included rigorous coordination with multiple agencies, municipalities, as well as numerous stakeholders and constituencies. Responsible for performing assignments in assisting project Senior Inspectors, daily activities. MOT counting and inspection, delivering of materials to Lab, measuring of areas and simple area calculations. 04/14 — 12/15: North Dade Project Improvement, North Miami, FL Pavement Distress Data Collector Duties were to inspect, monitor, and evaluate information related to annual inspections and monitors condition of the street. Conducted on-site evaluation to determine if the streets were still within standard condition levels. Inspected sample areas for distress, categorized the distress observed by type, extent, and severity, and calculated the pavement condition index from this data. Also entered data or information into a personal computer to: store information,generate reports,and evaluate street condition or history. 02/12—04/14: North and South Miami Drainage Cleaning,Miami,FL Drainage Inspector Ensured that the drainage system within the City was and remained in a fully operation condition in accordance with legislative and council guidance. Conducted on-site inspections and audits on time and in a manner that reflects positively on council. Maintained, under the direction of Supervisor an efficient and effective standard of drainage control,which complied with the drainage policies thus providing a benefit to all members of the community. Made sure that the catch basin, concrete slab covered trench, storm culver, p-section and manhole of a drainage inlet system were properly maintained. 4868 SW 72nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33155—Phone 30 .667.4772 — Fax 305.667.1790—www.nmdceng.com Joseph A. Clermont, E.I. Inspector 03/10—02/12: Long Island City Underground Facility Design Project,Queens, NY Junior Designer performed engineering duties in overseeing AutoCAD structural design drawing of transformer support. Used Micro station software to find and fix errors in an electrical system for Con Edison. Analyzed and designed beam for platform, and also calculated design model of beams such as W8x10. Made sure that the underground electric system and also the generating station of Manhattan were working properly by suing software such as M&S, Cufflink, Composite feeder, and so on. 0011 /00 01%0% Page 2 of 2 3/21/2017 Qualifications Search Fill E) C)1111111 . • . .401000011•1111.wft..---.... Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program ,..........,......._..........................,..._............... ._......,...,....,,...........________.........._....................._......................__.............______................,._,......,....,_......,............____........._..........._........__________............................_.....,.._.............,............................._............. Qualifications Search _____ .....,....... _________ ., Qualifications z TRAINEE 1 MATERIAL GROUP QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE 046548177 i[ !phalt 1 Asphalt Paving Technician-Level 1 ' 7/11/2021 1 046548177 i Asphalt ___IlAsphalt Paving Technician-Level 2 L9230/2021 046548177 aConcrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 1[ 4/2021 046548177 ikarthwork : Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 I 3/23/2021 ;, C46548177 1 Earthwork t Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 `[7/29/2021 r 046548177 1 Geotech ; Drilled Shaft Inspection 8/26/2021 046548177 GeotechPile Driving Inspection 11/7/2021 i 046548177 ; Management [RnalEsrtmes- ev&1 3/17/2021 Back 134215 http://ctgpflori da.corn/ctgp datalxxxyy23q.asp?search=C465481770 1/1 NEW00***00 0%10% MILLENNIUM Rodolfo Perez ENGINEERING. INCORPORATED Inspector Education: Years of Experience: 11 B.S. Civil Engineering University of Havana,Cuba, 1979 TIN No.: P622722493-000 Certifications: FDOT-CTQP Concrete Field Technician Level I FDOT Critical Structures Construction Issues(Self-Study) FDOT-CTQP Earthwork Construction Inspection Level I &II FDOT Temp.Traffic Control(Int. MOT) FDOT-CTQP Drilled Shaft Inspection ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade I FDOT-CTQP Pile Driving Inspection Troxler Nuclear Radiation Safety Certified FDOT-CTQP Final Estimates Level I FDEP-Florida Stormwater, Erosion &Sed.Control Inspector FDTO MSE Wall &Auger Cast Piles(Self-Study) PROJECT EXPERIENCE: 1212015—Present: 5R82611-75 Express Lanes Design Build Project FIN Nos.432687-1-52-01,432687-2-52-01,432587-1-56-01, 430795-1-52-01 &430795-1-52-01: Inspector Project cost: $244M. Project includes the addition of approximately 13 miles of Express Lanes to be constructed; ten (10) miles along the SR826 (Palmetto Expressway) and three (3) miles on 1-75 (SR93). The improvements consists of widening on both SR826 and 1-75, reconstruction on SR826, new construction in the median of 1-75 and an elevated structure connecting the Express Lanes on SR826 to the Express lanes on 1-75. Work also entails milling, overbuild (if required), and resurfacing on both SR826 and 1-75. Work also entails milling, overbuild (if required), and resurfacing on both SR826 and 1-75. This project includes new drainage, lighting, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), signage, and landscape. Additionally, there are eight (8) Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (RRR) projects and one safety project in the area of the SR826/)-75 Interchange which are also included in the scope of this project. Responsible for performing assignments in assisting project Senior Inspectors in the inspection of MSE Walls, reinforcing steel, street lighting, conduits & light pole installation, MOT, erosion control, lighting, signalization, utility relocations, earthwork operations, drainage installation subgrade operations, base construction, concrete& asphalt placement,guardrail, permanent striping. 10/2013— 11/2015: SR826/NW 57 Ave/Red Road from West 25 St to West 46 St and from West 46 St to West 54 St. FPNs: 249941-5-52-01 & 249941-1-52-01 Inspector— Project Cost: $36M. The improvements under this contract, consists of adding lanes and reconstruction along SR826/NW 57th Avenue from West 23rd Street to West 46th Street. Extensive water main work such as installation of a 12"water main straight over the culverts at West 29th Street and a 36"water main tie-in at the west end of the project per the request of the City of Hialeah Water&Sewer Department. Responsible for inspection of all drainage, earthwork,concrete, and asphalt pavement construction for this major reconstruction project Contact Person:FDOT District Six, Amanda Shotton (305) 640- 7194. 4/2012— 10/2013: 1-95 Express Lanes (Phase 2) FIN No. 422796-2-52-01 Inspector Project Cost: $112M. This 2-year Design-Build ARRA funded project is the second leg of the successful Managed Lanes concept on 1-95. This project includes many complex components, including but not limited to: 12 miles of roadway widening on 1-95, ITS installation for tolling and traffic monitoring systems, Power Distribution System, Turnpike Infrastructure installation (4 toll gantries and hub buildings), numerous cantilever and truss sign structures, traffic control devices for express lanes, drainage, asphalt resurfacing and overbuild, earthwork, bridge widening (concrete and steel structures), as well as major modifications and widening at the Ives Dairy Road and 1-95 Interchange. This project will include rigorous coordination with multiple agencies, municipalities, as well as numerous stakeholders and constituencies. Responsible for the inspection of all embankment, asphalt pavement, drainage, overhead sign structures, signalization, signing, pavement markings, landscaping, and lighting, monitor MOT activities, erosion control, verified sampling and testing materials, density log books and daily reports entries. 4868 SW 72nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33155—Phone 305.667.4772 —Fax 30 .667.1790 www.nmdceng.com Rodolfo Perez Inspector 5/2010-4/2012: SR826(Palmetto Expressway Section 2)FIN No. 249035-1-52-01 Inspector Project Cost: $190M Reconstruction of SR-826(limited access)from SW 24th St to SW 72nd St., including the SR-874 connection.This Design-Build-Finance project included the reconstruction of three major interchanges in Miami Dade County (MDC); SW 40th St., SW 56th St., and the system to system connection to SR-874. All structures required heavy phased construction and major MOT shifts on the SR-826 mainline,as well as the interphase of SR-826 to SR-874. Four (4) major steel plate girder bridges were replaced, encompassing skewed;curved steel plate girders over major roads and the CSX ROW. Coordination with the CSX facility management and special peer review was substantial. The project required extensive construction coordination with the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority(MDX) for access to their system and to avoid conflicts with the MDX project to the south, especially in regards to the construction of sound barrier walls. The project also required the installation of several major DMS structures, the tie-in of ITS system to system, and ITS backbone connections. Additionally, the project required extensive public involvement with several neighborhoods, businesses, and individual citizens to ensure that interchange and mainline construction activities were completed with as little impact to the community as possible. The project was completed on time and within budget. Responsible for overseeing the construction operations such as embankment, asphalt pavement, drainage, signalization, signing, pavement markings, drainage, landscaping. Monitor MOT activities and erosion control. 2/2008— 04/2010: 1-95 Managed Express Lanes (Phase 1) FIN No. 415456-1-52-01 Inspector Project Cost: $121 M. $121M. This project was a Design/Build/Finance venture and was the first section of the variable priced toll system being implemented in South Florida. This 2-year long project on this limited-access facility included many new and challenging aspects including, but not limited to: ITS installation for tolling and traffic monitoring systems, Turnpike Infrastructure installation, numerous cantilever and truss sign structures, traffic control devices for express lanes, drainage, concrete pavement, earthwork, bridge widening and major bridge work (micropiles, post-tensioning, steel structures). The project has been awarded SASHTO's Regional Award in the 2009 America's Transportation Awards Competition. Responsibilities included assisting with the monitoring of existing lighting and signalization utilities and installation of new fiber and electrical components, processing estimates, change orders, materials approvals, and RFI's for the I- 95 Managed Lanes Project. Responsibilities also included coordination of multiple MOT phases, lane closure approvals, and public outreach associated with lane and full closures along 1-95 and SR-112. 8/2007—2/2008: Florida's Turnpike Widening (Southbound)from N.of Sunrise Blvd.to S. of Griffin Rd. FPN No.406094-1-52- 01 Inspector Project Cost: $95 million. The1622 Calendar Day project is comprised of roadway widening and reconstruction, milling and resurfacing, bridge widening and new bridge construction, MSE wall construction, sound barriers and noise walls. Responsible for the inspection of MSE Wails, approach slabs, reinforcing steel, street lighting, conduits & light pole installation Monitor MOT activities and erosion control. 4/2006—8/2007: MDX Extension SR 836 from NW 1 07 Avenue to NW 137 Ave. MDX Project No. 83605. Inspector Project Cost: $137M Responsible for assisting project inspectors during daily activities. MOT counting and inspection, delivering of materials to Lab, measuring of areas and simple area calculations. This project included the construction of 8 new bridges and the expansion of 3 existing bridges. Responsible for performing assignments assisting Senior Inspector in the performance of their duties. Responsible for MOT Counting the inspection of lighting, signals, monitoring earthwork operations, drainage installation subgrade operations, base construction, concrete & asphalt placement, guardrail, seed and mulch sodding, permanent striping, signalization and bridge construction which include reinforcing steel, concrete placement. 00%0° 10%%00111% Pa e2of2 3/21/2017 Qualifications Search 1:11) C111:11:111111111111k., Florida Department of Transportation's Construction Training Qualification Program Qualifications Search Qualifications 1LTRAINEE MATERIAL GROUP 1 QUALIFICATION EXPIRATION DATE lf12272249 Concrete Concrete Field Technician-Level 1 1=20 LP62272249 Lo 4______[Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 1 Ez../22119 LP2F272249 Earthwork Earthwork Construction Inspection-Level 2 11/3/2021 Geotech Drilled Shaft Inspection 1=17 1.1161222 Geotech 1Pile Driving Inspection [10/24/2017 P62272249 irtAanagement [Final Estimates-Level 1 6/20/2017 Back 134215 • http://ctqpfi or i da.corn/ctqp_datahooryy23q.as p?s ear ch=P622722493 1/1 ?%:tet e: 1; Jr ,. , . J . ' 'w _ ?T"'' , Experience & Qua. ....7.,,,, ,. . .4.6,--#., . f„ • - _ - , •t ,... , , ---/__ 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be consid- ered without receipt, by the City,of the SQR directly from Dun& Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers, has submitted the Dun & Bradstreet Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the City as per requested in the RFP Tab 2,Section 2.3 A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 25 - -•-' , , ' • r-. 4 .. . . .."..,....., ,4-4,_••• ..... ..,,.. ,..:.. ". 111 11 N 11 . '..N . . , I I E 1 I .. •1 ' *..k.%' 1 PIN (44 1 , ' . ....71!.,.3'.1'.' -:--- w: , ,,, II . a , dti A _..., 00,,,,,,- , t .IlliCO13311 " t• • h.,,,,-----, ti 7 IN r . ... -• , .. ... f if lif ....... .1. , ....' r i •:• '1 "I 0 ., a... a,......... - — - TAB 3 ,* -,,,, et•-_ cp o a Approach and Methodology -a-- ilF iria... , • . :14.2r, - -1 w ' . ,� A �. 4r,�I.IG.r �T .w ..- .�... $ Approach 0 1 - & Methodology ail "'__._. - - -- ---""Alle-- - ' --77----s . ' 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable,which addresses,but need not be limited to:implementation plan,project timeline,phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. APCTE will utilize a simple but comprehensive approach to the performance of CEI services for this contract to ensure each project is a total success. Our Company philosophy, methodology and process identified in our mission state- ment is: to facilitate the successful and safe construction of the CEI Services on time and within budget while miti- gating all construction effects to the affected businesses and major project stakeholders and maximizing the owners' "return on investment": Following this mission we will strive to provide CEI Services that are effective,of high quality and that meet or exceed the City of Miami Beach's expectations.APCTE will strictly adhere to its commitment of nev- er having more than 5 open issues at any point throughout the duration of a Project. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers(APCTE)is a multidisciplinary Engineering consulting firm based in Dade County,which was incorporated in the State of Florida in 1995.Our CEI/CM Division comprising more than 40%of the company with 32 employees is led by Principal Nelson V. Perez, P.E.who has 35 years in construction engineering in South Florida,having served as Resident Engineer(RE)/SPE in over 15 different major projects for clients such as FDOT District 4,District 6,Turnpike and MDX.All our inspectors have multiple CTQP Certifications and a strong understand- ing of FDOT/City of Miami Beach policies and procedures and specifications.To manage the advertised"Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an As Needed Basis"we have selected Mr.Erik Sibila,P.E.as Senior Project Administrator/Project Engineer.Mr.Sibila is one of our best Project Admin- istrators and some of the successfully projects that he has been involved includes: MDX 836 Infrastructure Modifications for Open Road Tolling (ORT); M-D WASD Norris Cut Utility Relocation Project; FDOT Maintenance Engineering and Inspection (MEI) Contract;Government Cut Utility Relocation Projects; Biscayne Point Island Water Improvement Project;NW 25th Street Viaduct;30-Inch Ductile Iron Force Main along Harding Ave- nue,from 69th Street to 73rd Street;and Miami Greenway from SW 1ST CT to S.Miami Avenue Here are the reasons why APCTE should be favorably considered for this project: Intricate knowledge of City Policies and Procedures:APCTE has a strong understanding and knowledge of the City's goals and objectives for these type of projects. Our Staff does not require a learning curve as we have been working as an extension of the City for over 16 years in projects ranging from Design-Build to ARRA Signalization Improvements. EXPERIENCED CEI STAFF:Our proposed Project Engineer has an excellent track record as a Construction Engineer who understands the big picture and have been working on highly visible projects.Our team is also including a highly experienced PIO officer;Strong QA/QC Program: Led by the Principal Nelson V.Perez,P.E.,the firm's QA/QC program places emphasis on performance of the CEI staff in the field in strict compliance with the City's requirements as well as the quality of the completed product. FIRM COMMITMENT:Our Principals value the City of Miami Beach as a long term client and as such commit to deliver superior CEI services fulfilling or exceeding City expectations. APCTE will utilize a simple but comprehensive approach to the performance of CEI services for every project to ensure each of them is a total success. Our Company philosophy, methodology and process identified in our mission state- A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. I 2M-Xfpria 171" ,.i.' .�+IfLr7 'I Approach Vgilfs • ment is:to facilitate the successful and safe construction of the CEI Services on time and within budget while miti- gating all construction effects to the affected businesses and major project stakeholders and maximizing the owners' "return on investment": Following this mission we will strive to provide CEI Services that are effective,of high quality q Y and that meet or exceed the City's expectations.In the following paragraphs we summarized what will be ourg eneral approach and methodology to successfully complete our CEI Services for this project: • Schedule a Kick off Meeting with representatives of the City of Miami Beach(CMB) right after NTP and prior to g at- tending the pre-construction meeting to create an open forum of discussion of the critical aspects of the project and learn firsthand from the City what are their expectations in order for the project to be a complete success. APCTE will have Project Principal Nelson V.Perez,P.E.and our proposed Senior Project Administrator/Project Engi- neer Erik Sibila,P.E.attend this important meeting. • Maintain close communication/coordination with the CMB designated Project Manager throughout the construc- tion process. APCTE's Project Engineer Mr. Sibila will inform the CMB PM of any"Hot Issues"on theJ ro'ect dai- ly, weekly or as needed with a recommendation for resolution. APCTE considers Hot Issues those dealing with non-compliance issues,extra work,public involvement and safety. • Develop a comprehensive Community Awareness plan(CAP)with the assistance of proposed Public Involvement Officer Oscar Gonzalez from MRG Consultants to provide all business owners along the construction corridor with clear and concise communications regarding daily construction activities and more importantly ensure during all phases of construction that construction operations do not adversely impact any business and/or institution more than absolutely necessary. • Become thoroughly familiar with the contract documents(plans and specifications)to ensure this is filtered down to the senior and construction civil inspectors with the intent that the contractor can complete the work in reason- able close compliance with the approved plans always protecting the City and taxpayer's interests. • At all times Expedite resolution of open issues. Make sure that throughout the duration of the contract open is- sues are kept to a minimum (no more than 5 open at any time).All public involvement issues will be addressed immediately by PIO Oscar Gonzalez with the respective business owner(s). If necessary one in one conversations will be held by Erik and Oscar with the respective business owners to advise them of the impending construction operations P 9 • Analyze construction schedules for realistic logic and attainable production rates to ensure those comply with the requirements in the specifications and track updates at least once a month.Should the contractor fall behind schedule,we will immediately request a separate meeting with the contractor and the CMB PM to discuss alterna- tives to regain the time lost in the schedule. • Attend special Business Information Meetings to address concerns by Business owners with regard to construc- tion operations.All concerns will be documented appropriately thru meeting minutes and distribute to all attend- ees as soon as possible. • Maintain complete and accurate records of all activities and events in accordance with CMB requirements.The daily report of construction to have at a minimum all the information listed as part of the Scope of Services. • Maintain an electronic and hard copy filing system for the construction contract. Ensure videos/photographs are taken prior to start of construction and during the course of the project.Likewise photographs will be taken prior to construction and continue throughout the life of the project. • Ensure the contractor is documenting all significant changes to the construction plans on an ongoing basis with g 9 the intention of producing an accurate set of as built plans at the end of the project. • Issue non-conformance letters to the contractor for all substandard work not in-compliance with the contract requirements. Additionally, APCTE will verify that all material to be incorporated to the work has an approved shop drawing,appropriate certification or passing samples.Material test logs will be maintained on a weekly basis ready for review by the CMB representatives. • Perform independent review of change order requests submitted by the contractor andP rovide written docu- A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 2 4 ntw. f „ TA --*.t,,,,,,::!,..-:-. . -,,,_ , . 1 :_, itt,..-.4.--- A A.-,:.1 - '_,,,,:t.T .,...7.,-7.: *1- , i-..i'r,.issl. 1 _• .Aii.6. .....,..,,_ ....*: :,..-._ - Approach Methodology _ ...... . . .... ..... ., _....,... .. . mentation to the City in support or denial of the change order.Labor costs will be verified thru certified payrolls or industry standards.Contractor equipment cost will be verified using the Equipment Watch Blue Book and material costs thru submittal of appropriate invoices. • Provide interpretation of the plans, specifications and contract provisions. Respond to RFI's expeditiously. Coor- dinate with the EOR to ensure responses to RFI's are complete and followed in the field by the contractor.We will invite the EOR to the field if it would expedite response to pending RFI's. • Ensure shop drawings are submitted as required and reviewed within the allotted time in the contract specifica- tions. Inform the contractor immediately if a shop drawing is to be rejected so it can be resubmitted as early as possible mitigating any effect to the construction schedule.APCTE to maintain a shop drawing log that will enable anyone to know where a particular submittal is at any time during the review process. • Maintain an adequate level of surveillance of Contractor's activities. • Provide a final measurement of all pay items in accordance with CMB's Final Estimate standards. • Exemplify at all times a proactive approach to quality control and project challenges.Work as an extension of the CMB staff. After our general discussion about our approach to our CEI services, we are going to discuss in detailed bellow our approach and methodology on each of the Scope of Services items outlined in Tab 3,C2 Statement of Work Required, page 26 of the RFQ. FINAL ESTIMATES:The CEI personnel will maintain all documents necessary for the adequate computation and sup- port of final estimate quantities.We will maintain an adequate level of surveillance of Contractor's activities and pro- vide a final measurement of all pay items in accordance with CMB's Final Estimate standards.We will expedite Final Es- timate preparation and submittal to The City of Miami Beach within 5 work days after Final Acceptance of the project by developing a plan addressing the following: • Early identification of plan quantity items and close out of those items as appropriate once the work has been completed. -41,44111f ' • Early preparation of over run/under run report. . r • Early schedule to obtain surveying final as-built cross-sections. , �" • Early preparation of corresponding field books and quantity summa- sit.1111:: --- N if- , '� ,.ries. P 9P P Y ,4;• Verification and update of as built lans bein re ared b the con- ° ', Oletractor. 1 _ • Continuous monitoring of status of pay items.Quantities and final esti- -.. .x;. w= mate deliverables with updates every 3 months. • Early review of Final Quantities with respective contractors and sub- *7 contractors. Once a pay item is finalized, submit information to the respective prime contractor and applicable subcontractors to ensure there is an agreement of quantities prior to submittal of Final Estimate. If there is no agreement,inform the City of Miami Beach Project Manager immediately and provide recommen- dation for resolution. VALUE ENGINEERING:The APCTE CEI Team has a local staff whose work in the City of Miami Beach and in South Florida in general has exceeded expectations in the transportation industry. Our proposed Team members have a proven track record of successfully completing projects. At APCTE, our goal has always been to create the greatest possible value for our clients. Incorporating value engineering into our CEI process results in a greater added value and reduced costs. During the value engineering workshop which is lead by our Senior CEI Managers together with A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 3 ;., gengaT it, i , ,, 'ili-.1, --*„,, „....-„,:„...„... 4 li, . ., , itists,-- 1 .,- -,- •, -.7 -...., � Approach t O 0---- - , . •.v. an independent team,we would evaluate the project in the following areas: • Cost Reduction:less expensive alternatives to specify materials or construction process(constructability). • Value Added:higher quality products for the same or less cost. • Maintainability:reduce maintenance cost over the lifespan of the facility. Our Management Plan incorporates the assignment of very experienced staff in roles in which they are familiar and successful in completing. The APCTE CEI Team will act as an extension of City of Miami Beach when administering this Project, performing all coordination and documentation of all activities as described in the Standard Specifications. We strive to ensure that issues are adequately covered and we will keep the City of Miami Beach's Project Manager g well informed. Immediately upon commencement of this assignment,our Senior Project Engineer will establish lines g of communications with the appropriate parties,address and respond to any concerns or problems the parties may have,and schedule and chair the numerous Project start-up coordination meetings.These pre-ser- vices s include a re-ser- vices conference,value engineering and/or constructability review meetings,resident's information meetings,and a final estimates meeting. -. -w . `'" RESIDENT'S INFORMATION MEETINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COORDINATION: Adequate and targeted -- ` .- 'iiir,, public information is recognized as one of the key elements of any road- I , • ----- way contract. APCTE will work closelywith the Cityof Miami Beach in f ..- ' maintaining the residents, businesses, and motoring public informed 1. a" , ' - well in advance of construction operations, anticipated detours, and I roadway closures.When deemed necessary appropriate cust m � � Y R '' customer sur- veys will be run to assess our performance in dealing g with businesses _e 4, „ ; , and residents'needs and refine our processaccordingly.We understand -'"` -- that some businesses/residences in several Miami Beach corridors h a -ve their front door at back of sidewalk.This will require almost minute ute to minute coordination with them.The contractor will be pro- ' required to q .� : vide safe access for pedestrians to each business i residence along the corridor without exception;and Close coordination during demolition ,„., : it of existing and construction of new sidewalk.This will need to be fac- - s tored into the MOT setup on each phase. Loss ofarkin revenue to P 9 ,,,: `' � be addressed early on with the Cityof Miami Beach Parking Authority. bid..<'�Y*. r` aWe will coordinate with emergency and mail delivery services to ensure that there is no disruption of their normal operation. PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS:We will schedule the pre-construction meeting with all parties involved in the project including the City of Miami Beach representatives, permit agencies, contractor and utility companies in the P corridor. For utility coordination,we will expedite resolution to all potential utility conflicts for construction of drain- age,infrastructure improvements including wells,pipe systems,fence,and driveways, new lighting and landscaping. For asphalt pavement,we will verify that the contractor utilizes an approved asphalt mix and that isP laced in accor- dance with the approved plans and specs.We will run the pre-paving meeting with the contractor and Asphalt sub- contractor to ensure all construction issues are properly addressed including the proper disposal of all milled material and protection of all new catch basins during milling operations. WEEKLY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS MEETINGS:The APCTE Senior Project Engineer and/or the Project Adminis- trator, as required,will run effective weekly progress meetings with the Contractor and any involved subcontractor to review the construction schedule,schedule of submittal,correspondence log and request for information log and A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Co'p. 4 :,-,\ --4--sfy,..1,-.:,..k.,:-. - --,:,. 4 . ,_ .. .... - -, • . ..,- ,,,-. ... gpf- [ , J "'PPPPPP. :- Approach w , �`#rr _ - ,,.� "1-, WWW Methodology notice of potential claim log. In these meetings we will review the job progress,the short-range schedule and work plans including a 2 week and 4 week look ahead schedule. Emphasis will be placed on safety, work progress, shop drawing submittal status, requests for lane closures, night work or any other activity affecting the maintenance of traffic. Quality control, safety in the work place and job progress will be permanent items of the agenda for these weekly meetings.Plans for hurricane evacuations,special events,and other incident management topics are typically discussed at the Pre-Construction Conference,as well as at our weekly Progress Meetings to better prepare our Team, and the contractor for emergency situations.Good planning is our first line of defense and will ensure timely response to unforeseen situations. On a weekly basis APCTE will prepare a comprehensive tabulation of the quantity of each pay item satisfactorily com- pleted to date.On a monthly basis,we will report to the CMB Project Manager the progress of all major items of work noted in the construction schedule and a status of job progress relative to delinquency,if applicable. As part of this report,the Senior Project Engineer will discuss the expected production rate of each controlling item of work as well as any item of concern that may affect future performance. The actual production rate in the field will be compared to the theoretical on the approved schedule to determine if any remedial production effort is necessary. Supplemental agreements,and/or change orders if any,will also be addressed,clearly indicating their status. APCTE will ensure that the contractor complies strictly at all times with the requirements in the contract for wage rate provisions, EEO/AA special laws and regulations and City of Miami Beach Small Business requirements. Compliance with all these EEO provisions will be a subject of conversation at the weekly progress meetings.Contractor will be held accountable at all times for compliance with the EEO provisions and non-compliance letters will be issued accordingly if Contractor fails to comply as required. FIELD OBSERVATIONS:APCTE will provide interpretation of the plans,specifications and contract provisions.We will respond to RFI's expeditiously,coordinate with the EOR to ensure responses to RFI's are complete and followed in the field by the contractor,and invite the EOR to the field if it would expedite response to pending RFI's. Our Senior Inspectors will follow through all Quality Assurance and verification activities, provide a field follow up of daily activities with the correspondent documentation, and id density provide ens y og book reviews, NPDES survey monitor/re- views, material sampling, and testing. They will communicate . .- :. and coordinate with field staff, obtain accident reports, perform . safety/MOT field book and reviews,andperform utilityco- .',11E set-up '''a: - ordination and permits coordination follow up.They will provide material certifications/reviews,CTQP training support, punch list 11 1 Is tr:-• 1 ' -- items, final estimates support, water main and sewer line instal- i- -, • - lation process, and overall inspection responsibilities for signing - - and pavement markings, signalization, streetscape and concrete .7 I ' -4 * 1 e,' , - .,,,. * ,y , , work.Our Inspectors will provide daily reports of construction to 4 / i �� '.i. -„.� document contractor's operation follow up, milling and resurfac- ” .� fr,i--;?/-i—j- ing operations,earthwork and density measurements,piping lay- r' "at i. „ € - out certification,water main and sewer activities as required,curb and gutter, sidewalks, streetscape, signing and pavement mark- .: • 1/4, v ings and signalization work. . - Y One element that APCTE CEI Team Approach has employed on e *� many of our CEI assignments has been developing and imple- , P g P A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 5 .a' I ««r.R. y,`•�-'.1. 1 g111 ,01161.%, i ,... *VI W- ' e-...- _/. ,_. Approach Methodology & .,.. _- ,:, . , .._ ______ , menting innovative concepts to better streamline processes,save money and save time. Ideas that have been devel- oped in the past have accomplished these goals, and we are prepared to continue our efforts for this City of Miami Beach Project. We will commit to continually assessing the construction process for improvements and innovation.A summary list of these ideas and concepts includes: • Daily MOT inspection to assure that no deviation from the Contract Documents is taking place. • Shop drawings coordination to assure that they are processed as soon as possible. • Attaching electronic photos to Engineer's Weekly Reports • Field personnel on-call 24 hours a day,7 days a week,365 days a year • Field personnel able to work in the field as a total station with laptop and/or iPad and printing capabilities. • Pre-CQC Meeting with the Contractor's QC team prior to construction and whenever QC personnel change. As part of our inspection work/field observations the following activities will be prioritized: UTILITY COORDINATION: Expedite resolution to all potential utility conflicts for construction of any underground improvements like water mains, sewer, drainage, new lighting, landscaping, etc.A pre-utility meeting with the City and all other affected agencies will be schedule to develop action plans to resolve potential conflicts identified in the plans between the existing utilities and the new existing drainage systems. DEMOLITION WORK:Verify contractor demolish all existing sidewalk areas,etc.per the plans without impacting pri- vate property.Special attention will be given to ensure contractor does not remove any planting without talking with the owner/resident affected first even if the plans call for its removal as part of clearing and grubbing.When necessary our PIO Oscar Gonzalez will coordinate visits with the pertinent business owner so he/she is informed in advance appropriately. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS:Ensure the contractor's QA/QC plan has in place a pre-cast concrete fabrication quality control process for all drainage and pipe structures applicable to the project that meets or exceeds standards industry practices. CURB &GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK: Ensure line, grade and joint of these construction elements are im- portant not only to assure proper drainage and avoidance of water ponding, but also because they are visible to the public and have importance in the overall appearance of the project. ASPHALT PAVEMENT:Verify that the contractor utilizes an approved asphalt mix and that is placed in accordance with the approved plans and specs.We will run the pre-paving meeting with the contractor and Asphalt subcontrac- tor to ensure all construction issues are properly addressed including the proper disposal of all milled material and protection of all new catch basins during milling operations. PROJECT SAFETY:Ensure the contractor responds to safety hazards on the work zone immediately and for MOT de- ficiency issues within 24 hours.Issue notices of non-compliance as appropriate directing the contractor to correct the deficient condition and write a full report in the daily record of construction. APCTE's inspectors will check MOT de- vices constantly.The safety of pedestrians along the corridor and the CMB traveling public will not be compromised. STORMWATER PERMIT: APCTE will verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections,preparing reports and mon- itoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit inspector,the inspector should have successfully completed the"Florida Stormwater and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors':The APCTE's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER,Vol.57,No. 187,Friday,September 5, 1992, A&P Consulting Transportations Engineers,Corp. 6 1� , r L `7 i:S .-,;mer.—. ; .''' ' ''..:-''''''41: 3,,::...r. 4 . . ,.. . . , ' tom'" ,_ , .., . ivai.'6 :* 7:: — Approach & Methodology ..,......,,, : _. .Amp.h,_ ."e.z. .-..-,74.7.7:'-4 pages 4412 to 4435"Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites"and the Cityof Miami Beach's guidelines. Monitor strict compliance with the conditions outlined in all applicable permits for theJ ro'ect.Our Senior Project Ject En- gineers and Project Administrators will keep close coordination with applicable agencies such as NPDES,SFWMD 9and M-D DRER.The Contractor will be made aware of any special permit condition required during construction. Special attention will be given to how contractor deals with the water discharge resulting from his excavation of the ec in' i J ton wells associated with a stormwater pump station system.This water discharge cannot reach the Intracoastal g Waterway and/or open drainage areas. Contractor will be required to indicate to the Cityof Miami Beach how he will comply with this requirement in a regulated and acceptable manner. We will utilize erosion control items such as baled , , - („4,-:.. \\I hays, staked turbidity barriers, floatingturbiditybar- - '.' riers,soil tracking prevention devices an others as a �- irk -.�.+ plicable to control turbidity, prevent discharge, and 1• -- _ protect all environmentally sensitive areas.APCTE CEI \,....„ 23 will constantly inspect, monitor and document the ' ..a \_____ conditions of all erosion control measures and report ,--.'111111_ 11_11. e k • their condition on a weekly basis to the City of Miami �« :,� ---� Beach. If needed to avoid disputes the contractor and ,- _- `=- �` APCTE inspector can perform routine inspections of / , the erosion control devices jointly to reach consensus -�'1, - -,.---- -,7, • �d. _ on what measures to correct or augment. Immediate = monitoring of erosion control to be done after heavy w rains (greater than 0.50 inch) to ensure strict compli- ance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan •'' :‘ (SWPPP) for the project. Protection and mitigation of �' "," `- project areas to also be addressed in anticipation of a hurricane.A special meeting led byAPCTE Senior Project J En- gineer will take place to develop a plan for protection of all storm water areas,drainage ditches, lakes and ponds in advance of a hurricane and to avoid or minimize potential rework during and after the storm. SPECIALTY DESIGN CONSULTANT SITE VISITS: APCTE will maintain close coordination with consultants design g u tants 1 throughout the construction process to ensure the integrity of the design of the project as approved by the City of Miami Beach is preserved. When appropriate Design consultants will be invited to attend the construction weekly progress meetings to assist in the resolution of design issues on the project 9 or to answer any questions brought up by the contractor.The intent is that the design consultant at the end of the project canrovide final certification on of the design components at project closeout. DAILY REPORTS:Upon commencement of construction and until final acceptance of the work,APCTE will maintain on a daily basis a complete and accurate record of all activities and events related to thero'ect and a record o rd of a l l the work completed by the Contractor including quantities of pay items in conformitywith the final estimate prepa- ration procedure in the standard specifications. This record will be related to the activityID on the roved project pp p Ject schedule. APCTE will also maintain a log of all materials entered into the project with identification of the basis of ac- ceptance of each material.Testing and sampling of materials will be also recorded following the City of Miami Beach's guidelines. We will maintain complete and accurate records of all activities and events in accordance with CMB requirements.The A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 7 gapiw.ror ii-1. --4-47...,,,,,,e7..-4,-,--.. .:_- _ _• 40111-,l . - Approach & ..;,,...wmil. . Methodology daily report of construction to have at a minimum all the information listed as part of the Scope of Services.We will maintain an electronic and hard copy filing system for the construction contract and ensure videos/photographs are taken prior to start of construction and during the course of the project.We will ensure the contractor is documenting all significant changes to the construction plans on an ongoing basis with the intention ofrodu i p c ng an accurate set of as built plans at the end of the project. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD:Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overallress roof p g construction, beginning with pre-construction documentation,following with on-going construction documentation,9 and ending with post-construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshottype taken to define p the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-Builder',the City of Miami Beach's document management system,labeled by date,time and location. APCTE CEI will take a pre-construction video of the entire project area prior to the start of construction.Video record- ings will continue throughout construction to document exceptional progress milestone events or prior to imple- menting menting major MOT traffic switches.Photographs will be taken prior to construction and continue throughout g the life of the project. Photographs will be set in binders and divided into roadway/bridge and other applicable Y 9 pp cable categories. APCTE will upload all photos to the e-Builder'document management on a system weeklybasis. Y On complex projects, APCTE will also take aerial photographs preferably once a month of the entirer p oject site. A copy of all photographs will be given to the City of Miami Beach Project Manager regularly with sufficient information to allow understanding of the photograph significance such as the location, photodescription of work, direction date! time and pay item affected. P MI41_'.-7-- arv-------Milit" ---.i*--'*"... -. :..."___:,--:,----:-=-_..- --I------7------- _ ...�.. .:..-� _ `y'.�,.,'" ._..�., a ♦ -.� `"- .»a:° '------1:-. .--•.M_ rt'. '•I..,.. `-.e. yY�i`_)_____y��•.+[tea'•• t is..*-- � � Q - _ f 4 a a� nti 't_ �s �. 1_ ,t' ,3. .___ �c _k L,r.+s.S •.�.+"kms" �.rc���e _ _ 4. .7...„;..-te* -- — = — � � --'�►-� ..--,-_,....„7„,„ t� ..,7,..r,A 'aft+ ,---F c L ---'-'-'4__-=--- �1iI '- t' - MS'S'►-�` ,. ... 71,,•_i ,- F_ , - ..I ,• • _ .' ..--,,,,,...,..•.*,_. ' _ 444 w r } � �♦ .ten • t. it1/4164-246, _�._. ".'' A ,f e - moi` "�•� �,-•�. y*t ''''.*`-$..,. lr„i "" �._� ilii{ ' _ -," _ , ' - -""—'---"'-'"-'i.,442 ,j ; ti 7 ,. % ii,„,,,zc....„,*«: . "--- ...-,...._,,,,,.....* , -' ' . -", '''' '.---.iiiiv,.'"t,'.----'-'''.7-,.,, '_,-.44,..:,,,„'. . ',..-_---ft-..!__: . „ ,'-!•-•-1"7,._.:--r/.....- -._—__:-. `.,'_!"7" OIL....- IS 5-§:, i ' ' - - i „ .',._ ,?1.-,.--,-- .2.4j; ...._____,„I..,,,,::,_,,,,,m,-., ,_....-lit ..: :rk'"c..'',,-'''',-,:z'',,,,,,s.vs,:....,s,L7_'.- '-..,.......*' '7,4',:----A"1.7.41,:ort:,'. lit_ti ,--.rrn..,.--."'-_-'1,--"vgpairaMIN-1111111111116. _, ,,,,,.....71•:„......:\L.'74' •••': ,!-- .-:—,t--' ::4416, 1+7'1- i' t7, gam r 11.........:;-... _ -„n'''''*-"..__,..4 _ ,,,,,„, , „,,,,o,..„..-.,...,, • •. ...______ i i - 4-- — k. -1-:..--, : o . - ,,,.... - --,.„ .i.,- -. , , ..--- . EF-- -- - - - . . -..,..,,,x,,,,- .-- ,, ''' --- .-----------....-.,-4, ,- -,,,-- ... i- . '— ----z--- '''.. .7,,, • . . _ . Vale= = OM=—..''':- . - 'r.1, '� a.. t -.._...............______ _ a-"; , =- C' t" Y= f �',�`'�"'.I'� .s 4,, ,•""„ ..1.—"" ,-.1.1Z,..v.'s,7.4., :— .',...- — "' 'lir - :. 4y = • y __ _till:_e ._ - .,.,,,,A, , _ tirk) 1 V":". ..-=•-'- \ ..--"''::' � •‘fs ,..04,, !. i'-',.1.'- r _.-- . 4--...-A-Alieth .....iiml,e7-- _ _-,,,,, i-`,.-:.i.c.-:, ......... fttlipt '- A.-r, -.2w,...=.1.- =iiiii------- " - ik..._--'' , ''' I% , "mi.- mum =mu _ d4 '! NM I utast i. alter $ . - am MN Gam __ �-'- ,r;• -111011M Emu =MU 11111111111--INN MEM MIN MN 01111 .._ iMil ® .r"fir.. ..— s. t� Baas. - `( �.' K, M... •k .. .A-- .ir. J 1�.++.r i.Y.�rn,Y 7:1_111111111M-7,1A—_-ry^�' -7, - s .w A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 8 111 • Ir.,. • :. r III - -,,,,. r ,..--.. �.-. '.t '... �+,,�+,-,t_.,...,.:,-- '-j;yam , `"'1 c & Methodology_ _.... _. _ . ___.., . . , . 1_ ADHERENCE TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: APCTE's Contract Support Specialist (CSS) will maintain a log in the form of a spreadsheet of all materials incorporated into a project with theappropriate back up documentation in support of the basis of acceptance and/or rejection.This will be done for each shipment of material.The e APCTE CEI Team will also ensure the contractor is inspecting and accepting all materials incorporated into the e work as required by The City of Miami Beach contract specifications and City of Miami Beach policies and procedures. Particular em- phasis will be given to how the contractor handles disposition of all rejected materials. Additionally,tonally,when required APCTE CEI personnel will conduct offsite inspection at a precast/concrete site to ensure the contractor QA/QC per- sonnel is keeping detailed and accurate records of fabricator's daily operations,material sampling and p g testing results, and whether significant events impacting the work are being appropriately documented.The APCTE Team will also perform Quality Assurance of all material testing and ensure the contractor is complyingwith the established Quality Control Plan. DELIVERY OF UNACCEPTED MATERIALS TO JOBSITE:APCTE isr p epared to issue non-compliance letters to the contractor for all substandard work not in-compliance with the contract requirements.Additionally,APCTE C E will verify that all material to be incorporated to the work has an approved shop drawing, appropriate certification or passing samples.Material test logs will be maintained on a weekly basis ready for review bythe CMB representatives. SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS: We will ensure shop drawings are submitted as required and reviewed within the allotted time in the contract specifications. Inform the contractor immediately if a shop .dgill ,,,, r drawing is to be rejected so it can be resubmitted as early as pos- sible mitigating any effect to the construction schedule. APCTE will CHECKING OF SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS IS LIMITED TO GENERAL AND L ARRANGEMENTS ONLY. IT maintain a shop drawing log that will enable anyone to know where a O BETA VERIFICATION J 0THE ITEMS OR TOTAL MIS NOT INTENDED ATERIAL REQUIRED.. particular submittal is at any time during the review process. We will APPROVAL SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DETAILS OF DESIGN,CORRECT DIMENSIONS FOR also verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log,conducting PROPER FITTINGS, CAPACITY, PERFORMANCE, CONSTRUCTION, OR timely submittals,and uploading approved shop drawings to e-Build- ANY OTHER REQUIREMENT OF THE CONTRACT. erg". ❑ APPROVED LiDISAPPROVED, REVISE AS INDICATED BY NOTATIONS AND CORRECTIONS,AND RESUBMIT Z1 APPROVED ISSUANCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTICES:APCTE will make sure NOTATIONSS ANNDD CORD CORRECTIONS that the contractor at all times corrects any MOT or public safety de- AS INDICATED ficiency as soon as reasonably possible,should the contractor fail to DATE: respond to our verbal warning APCTE will notifythe CityPROJECT: 7 of Miami REVIEWED BY: Beach and the City of Miami Beach's Project Manager immediately CHECKED BY: and shall issue a Non-compliance Notice.All Non-compliance Notices issued shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements,q s,along with the require timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor.APCTE will strive to minimize mize the need to issue Non-compliance Notices to the Contractor by instituting a proactive attitude towards resolvingfield issues ues regarding MOT and project safety.Close coordination and communication with contractor superintendent p t personnel will be maintained at all times to minimize or avoid this kind of non conformance issues. DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES: APCTE will maintain accurate records ofre-construction conditions,P d Mons,and will use daily reports to identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has no- tified the respective owner(s). For the case of signing and pavement markings, they will typicallyconsist of the installation of single posts and theappropriate pavement markings and Reflective Pavement Markers as depicted in the Signing and Pavement Marking Plans.During the construction phase,the Contractor shall relocate e ocate all existing post-mounted street name and stop signs to a visible area undisturbed by the construction so as to minimize to the signs during construction.The Contractor will need to submit a list of the existingsigns to the Project Manager A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 9 wira ,,,,, .4.\ --t,%:,,,/t7:---,:;r-- ' - i i • : . • 14V'-'14 • ': • -'----4,-,:i.S.7 i , ♦ }•moi ,.c .___ _, _ __ . - ' Approach• & Methodology ,. , - %" -t '. - 4 t .. at the Pre-Construction Conference.Any lost or damage during construction sign shall be replaced at no additional cost to the City of Miami Beach. CHANGE ORDERS:We will ensure the contractor is documenting all significant changes to the construction action plans on an ongoing basis with the intention of producing an accurate set of as built plans at the end of thero'ect.We will � perform independent review of change order requests submitted by the contractor androvide written ten documen- tation to the City of Miami Beach in support or denial of the change order.APCTE will research labor,equipment and material costs as required to verify contractors'requests.Labor costs will be verified thru certified a rollsor p y industry standards.Contractor equipment cost will be verified using the Equipment Watch Blue Book for equipment rental and operation costs and material costs thru submittal of appropriate invoices.We will maintain a Change Order log g and upload approved Change Orders to e-BuilderT"". REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION/CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT CLARIFICATION (RFLS/CDCS): Our qualified Team will provide interpretation of the plans,specifications and contract provisions and respond to RFI's expeditious- ly.ly.We will coordinate with the EOR to ensure responses to RFI's are complete and followed in the field - p by the contrac- tor.We will also invite the EOR to the field if it would expedite response to pendingRFI's.All RFI and CDC will be uploaded to e-Builder'". responses APCTE will instill this approach to the Project to ensure RFI's are effectively managed.We propose prioritizing RFI' s asfollows: RFI'S RESPONSE TIME TYPICAL Emergency 24 hours or less Utility conflicts on watermain/drainage construction or MOT/Safety related is- sues Quick 3 days Plan note clarification,issue requiring as built surveys. Fast 7 days Design/Changes/plans revisions Our Senior Project Engineers and/or Project Administrators will track all RFI's utilizingcomputerized spreadsheet. a p p eadsheet. Pending RFI's will be subject of discussion at all weekly progress meetings and we will a99ressive!y follow up respons- es es to RFI's and review of payment requisitions.We will document quantities of applicable pay items on a daily basis to provide accurate support data for evaluation of monthly requisitions.Disputeduantities to be handled byour Senior Project Engineers,as deemed necessary. q SCHEDULE:APCTE will closely monitor CPM-Baseline or Progress Schedules as appropriate and subse subsequent monthly q updates and will immediately discuss any and all potential situations that mayplace under risk the project p sect comple- tion.APCTE will maintain an open communication with the City of Miami Beach officials and will relate the status of the project construction and upcoming activities.We will analyze construction schedules for realistic logic andattain- able attain able production rates to ensure those comply with the requirements in the specifications and track updates p pates at least once a month.Should the contractor fall behind schedule,we will immediately request a separate meeting p with the contractor and the CMB PM to discuss alternatives to regain the time lost in the schedule.Arintout of all open items p will be attached to the weekly meeting agenda and its consideration will be aermanent item of the e agenda. Also, comments stating the reason for non-attainment will be part of the record until activity is finally completed. p PAY REQUISITIONS: APCTE will establish a procedure with the contractor to review payment requisition requests on the last Friday of the month for work completed during the month.We will advise the Cityof Miami Beach regarding quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only Y q n y be MMP Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 10 Mai., , g f .44);‘,V l+k�_. .ice;x ; . i ---, , - kitia, , -:-1 ...„......:„..„4,... -1. - :. IApproach & Methodologyw.v...1 -.rms. approved by the City of Miami Beach.Consistent with our established approach APCTE isreared to proactively ad- dress p ad dress all the project closeout activities to ensure a successful and effective )ro'ect completion. P EQUIPMENT TESTS AND SYSTEMS START-UP:APCTE's CEI Team is completely aware of therequirements y testing requirements for Transportation and Pipeline construction projects,and is fully certified toerform verification on testing on all types of asphalt,concrete,earthwork,and other required tasks. • Earthwork Construction:The Contractor QC Manager will develop and maintain a densitylogbook for g o all earth- work construction including: Pipe backfill, French Drain,Trench Drain, regular embankment,Type gyp B Stabilized Sub-grade and lime rock base.One of 4-density tests taken by the contractor's QCersonnel will p be verified by our inspectors.Particular emphasis will be given to how contractor handles all densitytest entries in the logbook gook and the disposition of all rejected materials on the project.The disposition of all soil and earthwork materials on the project will be performed by a contractor individual holding the CTQP Earthwork Level II verification and supervised by our Senior Roadway Inspector.All disposition of earthwork materials wilrejectedl for construction be in accordance with in-place QCP.Appropriate earthwork verification and if necessaryresolution testing to be coordinated with the assistance of an independent Lab designated by City of Miami Beach. • Concrete Construction:We will ensure that any concrete pour is Inspected and supervised byapproved P an pp ed FDOT CTQP Certified Concrete Technician to ensure all in-place quality control procedures are strictly followed.The Senior Project Engineer and/or Project Administrator will conduct a pre-pour meeting with all applicable con- struction struction contractors and inspection personnel to ensure all Quality Control activities are clearly delineated in advance of a concrete pour. • Asphalt Construction:We will ensure all asphalt production at the designated supplier plant to be done under the supervision a. - P of a CTQP , &�> Asphalt Plant level II Technician workingfor the sup- -.. .* p plier.This technician to be available at the asphalt plant at all P times.We will also ensure all asphalt paving to be supervised by a CTQP Asphalt Paving Level II Technician provided by the 7, contractor who will staybehind the �``` paver at all times without , , ;,�,- exceptions. Contractor will also be recommended to have a x CTQP Asphalt PavingLevel technician � • • �'� " ` \' p e I technician monitonn densities � 7- and rolling patterns to preserve quality and maintain pavement i ii:i. integrity. For milling/resurfacing operations the contractor will ;,,,,:,:-..,4, also be recommended to have a CTQP Asphalt Paving Level It:.-t%:.:',,4 Technician available to check all milled areas for cross slope and4,A, *4-4, tr-,,, r It,,, 1 thickness depth.At the pre-paving meeting, we will established Os,j ; _ together with the contractor and asphalt superintendent who ' �$.•.,�, will be the individual responsible for writing asphalt reports and ,,,,,,..»-�° .~ • reconciling them with the respective plant reports.The Senior `4� „,::):J: - ' -',. Project Engineer and/or Project Administrator will work closely -,.,,,,L ,- - 1 with Asphalt subcontractor to ensure all quality control proce- ••_a.al.��r,.._�,A••y dures for the proper operation of the plant are strictly adhered to.He will also discuss all construction and inspection issues in a pre-paving meeting to avoid any lapses in the documentation process,which could impact the timelyprogress of the work: PP g RECORD DRAWINGS: APCTE will produce as-built plans in accordance with City of Miami Beach procedures.We will set aside a set of plans for record of all as-builts. Project personnel will use contract half size drawings to denote A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 11 gfirw. , _ __....t.*7 i 'lf,,j,,-'s:1-**.-.— — Approach ft-7-i & Methodology , all changes to the project,as-built surveys,as-built sketches, and plan revisions not requiring revised drawings from the Designer of Record (DOR).This data will be transferred periodically by APCTE Contract Support Specialist to the PP p as-built plan record.The maintenance of an accurate as-built record throughout the constructionP eriod facilitates accurate payment and eliminates potential for conflict with the contractor. SAFETY:APCTE will ensure the contractor responds to safety hazards on the work zone immediately and for MOT de- ficiency issues within 24 hours.Issue notices of non-compliance as appropriate directing the contractor to correct the deficient condition and write a full report in the daily record of construction. APCTE's inspectors will check MOT devic- es constantly,including at night.The safety of pedestrians along the corridor and the CMB traveling public will not be compromised.When a safety situation presents itself,we will follow the procedures indicated in the Scope of Services. QUALITY CONTROL:Our Quality Control Plan emphasizes compliance with the critical requirements designated q 9 by the City of Miami Beach Project Scope of Services. Our company process requires that a Project Administrator from one of our offices visit the job 100 days after it started and do a review of all CEI'field ersonnel then3 to 6 P every months thereafter depending on input from the City of Miami Beach and whether we have findings that need to be addressed.After each review if there are findings,then a lesson learned meeting is held with the CEI staff orP ersonnel in question to ensure we learn from what happened and avoid future re-occurrence.Our QA/QC lanplaces emphasis P on how the inspector is carrying out his duties as well as the quality of the completedJ ro'ect bythe contractor in P close conformance with to the contract plans,project technical and special provisions,City of Miami Beach Standards and policies and procedures. The APCTE approach will be a combination of quality assurance and quality control by first ensuri ng the CEI personnel assigned under each task is performing their duties on a daily basis as required by the Cityof Miami Beach Project J Manager,and then APCTE will place emphasis on the quality of the completed work.The key to this contract is select- ing the right individuals for the job.The CEI personnel being proposed here by APCTE have the technical background, relevant experience,excellent CTQP training,ability to learn quickly and absorb a lot of information,outstanding oral and written skills and ability to multitask,professional demeanor to work as an extension of the City of Miami Beach staff,and strong desire to take ownership of the job. APCTE's leadership will ensure each CEI personnel assigned under a particular task is performing his or her duties as required.We will have regular meetings with the City of Miami Beach Project Manager and other relevantP ersonnel to ensure the assigned CEI personnel is responding to the challenges and performing their duties in accordance with the contract requirements.When deemed necessary,we will augment the CEI personnel training or provide guidance to ensure the tasks are being carried out successfully.The City of Miami Beach Project Manager will be invited to the QA/ QC meetings held with the CEI personnel in an effort to obtain constructive criticism to ensure the bestP erformance on the contract by each and every one of the CEI personnel assigned on the tasks including all the sub consultant personnel.Individual performance will also be monitored to ensure he or she is carrying the duties as required and to identify any areas needing improvement.APCTE's company culture and philosophy are based on implementing a"les- sons sons learned"approach to avoid recurrence of any lapses on the QA/QC process.Those processes that do not work are discarded and those that do work are constantly refined to ensure the City of Miami Beach receives the bestP roduct. The bottom line in our approach is to provide a CEI staff that works well with the Cityof Miami Beach,integrates well g with other City employees, performs its duties in a professional manner always representing the best interest of the City of Miami Beach and does all the right things for the project to be successful.APCTE's approach will have"zero tolerance;and should a CE!individual of APCTE or their subs fail to provide the services expected byProject � our � Manager he or she will be replaced immediately without exceptions. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers,Corp. 12 , mai.„,, ' i -7 ii4,41,E..,...;-.-,-.-:!:::,,_ i =- —- • .... t- Approach & Methodology .7 , - .— —a.. ......AIM l'--- Le......... _ 44, PROCEEDING WITH DISPUTED WORK: APCTE's firmly believes in claim avoidance and prompt resolution of dis- putes. APCTE will look ahead into the Contractor's schedule for possible conflicts,delays or other circumstances that could result in a potential claim in order to avoid problems before they happen.This approach will be implemented through review of the contractor's schedule,coordination with third parties,on-site inspection,documenting of sub- mittal schedules and request for information logs. The vehicle for this coordination will be the weekly meeting in which the contractor will present the proposed activities for the two(2)and four(4) upcoming weeks. Such informa- tion will be analyzed and a comparison made of actual vs.scheduled progress proposed by the contractor,the need for any permits, notices and most important,whether the proposed activities by the contractor will support its own production schedule and milestones. At all times we will act in the best interest of the City of Miami Beach protecting the taxpayer's interest.On our proactive approach to avoid claims we will act quickly to resolve disputes before they become magnified and be fair and consistent in our everyday dealings with the contractor.In case that a potential for a claim is detected by the CEI team,this will be made known to the contractor,recommending or soliciting alternate courses of action. When a claim cannot be avoided,APCTE CEI will assess its validity based on the facts and provide recommendation to CMB to assist in settling the claim.Each claim analysis/review will be completed and prepared in accordance with the FDOT CPAM and the FDOT standard specifications and as part of our analysis/recommendations we will give multiple scenarios for CMB to consider in order to facilitate claim resolution and a successful settlement. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC(MOT) DURING CONSTRUCTION:Based on our previous experience working on City of Miami Beach projects, we will ensure that the Contractor complies with the MOT given in the plans calling for a special construction train or sequence of operation along the corridor or neighborhoods. APCTE will make sure of the following: 1) Contractor } ' 1 - , A,- -.11Y-- - _alp. ---a.,� complies with the limits of each 1� ti ,':. ., . . 3 1 "�' ' f .g phase of construction and install 1 --,--� ,--. !1 '- - . w �� a L,--4 # 4- ,xy %': . moi,. the detour signs prior to begin- - ;. 44 _ ning work in each block phase, f . . -1:41,..-1,-t-----4,.--- -1_ :� __. ,,s _.. 2) Contractor does not move to -- � -' 4"-s-7-eV,: - -� Z� lir another block without substan- - -e' . " .,,:;:,_ i , - ti. tial completion of the block he _ _ _-lc s - =,-.: �, is workingon which will include - � �_ '�--� - ='`_ .�;: open it to traffic and pedestrians; it -,, 3)Contractor to give 2 weeks no- -- . k tice to businesses / residents in a particular block prior to begin 4,. - - . , work; and 4) Contractors takes M • ;;+.w a >,�'°. _ into consideration the heavy pe- . ,. . -Amor -- destrian traffic in most of the Cit - - corridors and prioritize pedestri- - ;:_ -;��.. .4. :., an safety. -� .. A&P Consulting,Transportation Engineers,Corp. 13 ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E I-1:1 MIAMI BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017-028-KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 M I AM I BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence -owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability , $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 X_7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. 7.�,, �� 1 28-KB