Loading...
Agreement with Wade Trim, Inc. gai7- A?g,S-3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29853 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 8 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 15 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 15 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 16 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 18 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 18 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 19 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 20 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 21 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 21 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 22 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 22 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 23 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 28 SCHEDULE B 31 SCHEDULE C 32 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 33 ATTACHMENT B 43 ATTACHMENT C 44 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT This Agreement made and entered into this-day of , 2017, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and WADE TRIM, INC., a FLORIDA corporation having its principal office at 2100 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Suite 970, Coral Gables, FL 33134 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on March 22, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT(the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017- 29853, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with WADE TRIM, INC. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B —Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C —Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any negligent design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use reasonable efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation,(and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure, within the standard of care, the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein . including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from negligent error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. 5.2.10 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications. Assist as needed with matters relating to stakeholder engagement and communications. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed and for Not to Exceed Consultant Service Orders; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category)for Not to Exceed Consultant Service Orders. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated. to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 Except for Professional Liability, Workers Compensation, and Employer's Liability, the City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or non-renewal of any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees where recoverable by law, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon.Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes caused by a negligent error or omission in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City resulting from a negligent error or omission shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the negligent errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's negligent errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the negligent error or omission. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of negligent errors or omissions, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager or the City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto for purposes of the administration of the Project (and without waiving any claims or defenses of the Consultant with respect to the underlying dispute). This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SUBJECT TO CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 558.0035, FLORIDA STATUTES, A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CONSULTANT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OCCURRING WITHIN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Roy Coley, Assistant Department Director/Infrastructure Director All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: WADE TRIM, INC. 2100 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Suite 970 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attn: Holly Kremers, P.E. Tel: (813) 404-3958 Fax: (888) 499-9624 Email: hkremers@wadetrim.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be.governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct negligent errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such negligent errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract. Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BE A -'µ: r kiL r' r'` 7 if) „,_,-..----E\-z:,..L., - 4,1/4---1.,,[2fr:Ct'i, ( , CITY CLE K 7-, ,.. - A .> , 4' Attest jjj-))(1/` x >',‘ QNSU y; 00 •DE TRIM, INC. ✓ --w .r.J`-.fes`....! .,!1+> of ^ f - s, t-I 4:-.' q - '' ---, ' , ' - um ' A .u....40P A.11 :, \-)\Z/1 :-114 ' .1:7" /2 ,ma;.: •.. fir ryf / / ` _. 1 A Signature/17,4,- ,er -. , ti, = ri,e President PAeJle 7. 6AtQcyi 14 trentr5 Print Name Print N me APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTI 0 N ' ,/,..y. ei / , ,,- /0/ f 7 7— ity • torney , At- Date r' SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND WADE TRIM, INC. The Consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its Water and Wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. Proposer shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. The services described in items I, and II are a priority and are intended to be awarded immediately. The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future. I. Develop Water System Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 1. Prepare a description, and general inventory of the water distribution system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing water distribution system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2. Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure. The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. I. Develop Wastewater Collection System CIP 1. Prepare a description, and general inventory of the wastewater collection system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing wastewater collection system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2. Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure. The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. II. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Master Planning 1. Master plans to include, but not limited to water, quality and service goals, present and future system deficiencies, engineer's recommended alternatives for achieving goals and correcting deficiencies, and recommended implementation schedule. III. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Hydraulic Modeling 1. Conduct hydraulic modeling evaluation of entire system or the specific areas required. Include the following, but not limited to, calibrate the model using field measurements and observations, prepare and submit a hydraulic model design elements report, and prepare a system capacity and expansion report. IV. Water and/or Wastewater Systems expansion and/or replacement construction design, including pumping stations 1. Provide engineer signed and sealed plans for improvements identified in the master plans, hydraulic modeling, or other needs as directed by the City of Miami Beach. Plans are to be based on good engineering practices, and performed by an engineer(s) qualified in the State of Florida to perform such work. V. Construction Management Services. 1. Provide construction management services which may include (but not be limited to): (1) assist with design development of third parties to ensure intended goals are achieved; (2) provide budget development, estimating and value engineering services; (3) assist the City with the bidding process for applicable projects; (4) assist with jurisdictional reviews and project related mitigation issues; (5) construction related activities and reviews, including pay applications; (6) project close-out and occupancy. VI. Project Studies and Reports. 1. Provide applicable project studies and reports, including (but not limited to) bond feasibility reports, construction feasibility and constructability reports, project schedules, and reports or studies required by agencies with jurisdiction over the scope of work. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: WADE TRIM, INC. PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (RFQ 2017-129-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: � Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXX)00(XX Design Services* $ )()(J( )()()( Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXX)(X Construction Administration ** $X)00000(X Reimbursable Allowance*** $XX)00000( Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$X)000(X, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note*': The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Water and Wastewater Systems Consultant RFQ 2017-129-KB Labor Category Hourly Rate Admin/Clerical $50.00 Administrator $85.00 Associate $188.00 CADD Manager $152.00 CADD Operator $115.00 CADD Technician $75.00 Clerk $80.00 Designer $108.00 Draftsman $72.00 Draftsperson $101.16 Engineer $134.75 Engineer/Assistant Engineer $113.00 Engineering Intern $89.00 Engineering Technician $45.00 Field Inspector $85.00 Inspector $85.00 Principal $275.75 Principal Designer $141.00 Principal Engineer $151.00 Project Engineer $165.50 Project Engineer Senior $185.50 Project Geotechnical Engineer $120.00 Project Manager $194.00 Project Manager Senior $243.69 Scientist/Assistant Scientist $88.00 Senior Associate $238.00 Senior Driller $65.00 Senior Engineer $175.00 Senior Field Coordinator $144.00 Senior Geotechnical Engineer $143.00 Senior Principal Designer $159.00 Senior Principal Engineer $172.00 Senior Principal Scientist $164.00 Staff Geotechnical Engineer $90.00 Survey Crew Member $62.32 Survey Designating Crew Member $119.55 Survey VAC Crew Member $135.05 Surveyor& Mapper $113.80 Tor•hr,ir•ioCtAo nn SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS None Listed. ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 2017-29853 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING IN PART THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER,PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)NO. RFQ 2017-129-KB FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER& WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH HAZEN & SAWYER, P.C., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER, TO SERVE AS THE CITY'S PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER, TO SERVE AS A CO-PRIMEILEAD CONSULTANT; FURTHER, ESTABLISHING A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS, ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS, AND WITH RESPECT TO THE PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANT POOL, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH 300 ENGINEERING GROUP,P.A.,AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER;AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC.,AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER;KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND WADE TRIM, INC., AS THE SIXTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE AWARD OF ANY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE ADVANCE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, on March 22, 2017, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-129-KB for Engineering Services for Water & Wastewater Systems Projects;and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB (the"RFQ") was released on March 24,2017; and WHEREAS,a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on April 5,2017;and WHEREAS,on April 25,2017,the City received a total of 17 proposals;and WHEREAS,the Committee convened on May 2, 2017 to review and score the remaining proposals;and WHEREAS,the Committee was provided an overview of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law,general information on the scope of services,and a copy of each proposal;and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows: Hazen &Sawyer, P.C., as the top ranked proposer;and with respect to the pool of pre-qualified consultants for specified tasks on an as-needed basis, recommended CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; 300 Engineering Group,P.A.,as the third ranked proposer,AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer; King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Wade Trim,Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer;and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's comments and rankings,the City Manager has recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen&Sawyer,P.C.,as the top ranked prime proposer to serve as the lead/prime consultant; and with respect to the pool of pre-qualified consultants for specified tasks on an as-needed basis, authorize negotiations with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; 300 Engineering Group,P.A.,as the third ranked proposer;AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer; King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Wade Trim, Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept in part the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-129-KB for Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen.&Sawyer, P.C., as the top ranked proposer,to serve as the City's Prime/Lead Consultant; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, to serve as a co-prime/lead consultant; further, establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to Water and Wastewater Projects, on an as-needed basis, and with respect to the pre-qualified consultant pool, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with 300 Engineering Group, P.A., as the third ranked proposer;AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Wade Trim, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration, provided, however, that the award of any program management services shall be subject to the advance approval of the Mayor and City Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ,? day of NtW NaV 201,. .. 7 r /f //,--'--7 Philip Levine; ay ATTEST: ,j/ / Ra a Gt ado,Ci erk ./ .��', ,.....E halt APPROVED AS TO Q % FORM&LANGUAGE I' .."" . -.. 44 &FOREXECUTION N ..4 # 0 l 'i 1. W "C)..: . (311C17.1--$ R ? ,,\c()‘� : 1"... T City Attorney .Q Date $ A.% ‘4,,i, />. .) 'r giR) - -.qRCH ,,,,7 i VIM 4 Resolutions-C7 E MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales,City Manager DATE: May 17,2017 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFP) NO. 2017-129-WG, FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS The City purchases treated potable water from Miami/Dade County, and resells it to its customers. There are multiple connections to the Miami/Dade County water transmission system. The City collects wastewater from its customers,including satellite cities,and conveys it to Miami/Dade County for treatment. The City provided (at its most recent count) potable water service to an estimated 10,414 domestic retail water accounts, and to approximately 2,958 irrigation (water-only) accounts. Expressed on an equivalent residential unit ("ERU") basis, the System provided service to about 29,001 domestic water ERUs and 8,443 irrigation ERUs. An ERU represents the average capacity for a single-family residential account (served by a 5/8-inch meter), and is used to measure the total customer base on an equivalent basis (how many total equivalent households are being served)since a significant number of customers may represent a single account that serves a large group of customers(e.g.,a condominium),or commercial customer that uses a large amount of water (e.g., a hospital or school). The ERUs were based on information published by the American Water Works Association regarding meter capacities, and which form the basis for the determination of meter equivalent factors. The City provided(at its most recent count)sanitary sewer service to an estimated 10,414 retail sanitary sewer accounts, and 29,001 sanitary sewer ERUs (all domestic water customers receive sanitary sewer service).The City also provides wholesale sanitary sewer to the Village of Bal Harbour, the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the City of North Village, and the Town of Surfside(collectively,the"Satellite Cities"). The City is over 100 years old, and many of his assets are believed to have been installed Page 228 of 878 during the time of its inception. I mprovements,and expansions have been made throughout the City's history, and a comprehensive review of the entire water, and wastewater infrastructure needs to be performed. It is the City's intention to develop, and implement a long-term capital improvement plan to best position the community with a resilient, robust, environmentally responsible,and future proof,water,and wastewater system to serve into perpetuity. The City requested proposals from qualified firms to provide Engineering Services for Water& Wastewater Systems Projects to meet the City's needs for professional engineering services relating to its water and wastewater infrastructure improvement goals. Through the referenced RFQ,the City seeks to contract for the following: 1. Prime Consultant(s). The Prime Consultant shall act in the capacity of the City's lead consultant on its long term capital improvement projects for water and wastewater. The selected prime consultant shall provide the City with subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its water and wastewater systems.The Prime Consultant shall guide the City through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient,environmentally responsible,dependable,and future proof. 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants.Additionally,to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). RFQ PROCESS On March 22, 2017, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No.2017-123-KB for Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects. On March 24, 2017, the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on April 5, 2017. RFQ responses were due and received on April 25, 2017. The City received a total of 17 proposals.The City received proposals from the following firms: • 300 Engineering Group,P.A. • A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. • AECOM Technical Services,Inc. • CH2M Hill Engineers,Inc. • Chen Moore and Associates,Inc. • CPH,Inc. • CPM North America PLLC • CSA Central,Inc. • Hazen and Sawyer,P.G. • HT&J,LLC a King Engineering Associates,Inc. • Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam, Inc. • Milian,Swain&Associates,Inc. • Pennoni Associates Inc. • R.J.Behar&Company,Inc. • Stantec Consulting Services Inc. • Wade Trim,Inc. On April 18,2017,the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC#206-2017. The Evaluation Committee convened on May 2, 2017, to consider proposals received. The committee was comprised of Roger Buell,Assistant City Engineer, Public Works Department, Page 229 of 878 City of Miami Beach; Roy Coley, Assistant Director/Infrastructure Director, Public Works Department, City of Miami Beach;Jay Fink,Assistant Director, Public Works Department, City of Miami Beach;Manny Marquez,Assistant Director, Finance Department,City of Miami Beach; and Margarita Wells,Acting Director, Environment & Sustainability Department, City of Miami Beach. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A,in the following order: 1. Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. 2. CH2M Hill Engineers,Inc. 3. 300 Engineering Group,P.A. 4. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 5. King Engineering Associates,Inc. 6. Wade Trim, Inc. 7. Milian, Swain&Associates,Inc. 8. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 9. Pennoni Associates Inc. 10. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 11. Chen Moore and Associates,Inc. 12. R.J.Behar&Company, inc. 13. CPH, Inc. 14. HT&J,LLC 15. CPM North America PLLC 16. CSA Central,Inc. 17. Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam,I nc. A summary of each top-ranked firm follows: Hazen and Sawyer According to the information provided by the firm,Hazen's focus is exclusively on water, wastewater, and stormwater engineering. We stand out amongst our peers in terms of subject matter expertise, local capital/master planning experience, and water/wastewater engineering design. In fact, Hazen currently provides the same services required by this contract to your neighbors including: Hialeah, Homestead, North Miami,Coral Gables, North Miami Beach, and Miami-Dade Aviation Department(MDAD).By leveraging this directly applicable experience for other local coastal cities and our subject matter experts, the Hazen team will deliver a capital and master plan that is Resilient, Innovative, Sustainable,and will foster Economic Growth.We are a ready to begin work and commit to providing a prioritized capital plan immediately. CI-12M Hilt Engineers,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,CH2M fully supports and embraces the City's goal of developing resilient, robust water and wastewater systems in an environmentally responsible manner,as embodied in Miami Beach Rising Above.Thier worldclass experience —both in South Florida and around the globe—provides the local knowledge and industry leadership that are essential for developing the water and wastewater infrastructure that will Page 230 of 878 serve the City reliably and cost-effectively for many years to come. Industry Leading Engineering Qualifications Demonstrating the world-class expertise CH2M brings to the City of Miami Beach,we have a long:consistent history of leading the industry in the provision of water and wastewater-related services. CH2M has been the country's No. 1 Sewer/Wastewater Company for 11 consecutive years, the No. 1 Pure Designer, and the No. I Construction Management/Program Management Company. As a practical example of the advantages that our industry leading resources and experience bring to the City of Miami Beach,the City need only look as far as Miami-Dade County, where CH2M is Owner's Agent for the $5.7 billion Ocean Outfall Legislation (OOL) Program. As Owner's Agent, CH2M is responsible for charting the future course of the County's wastewater system so that complex OOL requirements,such as rerouting wastewater flows from the east to the west,are met by 2022. 390 Engineering,Group,P.A. According to the information provided by the firm, We assembled an unparalleled team of subject matter experts with the necessary local support to better serve the needs of the City of Miami Beach and to develop and implement a long-term capital improvement plan--with the available information and in a short period of time.We assembled a team which 1)understands your water and wastewater system vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise, 2) is willing to work 24/7 to make your system resilient, robust, environmentally responsible, and future proof,and 3)brings a fresh perspective to the City of Miami Beach. Their team consists of: Tetra Tech, a global engineering firm ranked No. 1 in Water by Engineering News-Record (ENR) for 13 consecutive years with over 16,000 employees worldwide, and 500 employees in Florida; D&B Engineers, a water and wastewater firm, operating since 1965,with expertise in underground aging infrastructure;and the FTU Sea Level Solutions Center, a group of experts in the development of adaptation strategies for communities subject to climate change/sea level rise in South East Florida,including the City of Miami Beach. This team is reliable, cohesive, efficient, and has well-established professional relationships. We have collaborated on past projects and continue to work together, achieving collective results that equate in increased client satisfaction. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,AECOM has a history of performing water and wastewater utility consulting services to municipal clients throughout coastal southeastern Florida facing similar resilience and sea level rise issues as the City of Miami Beach. These clients include the Cities of North Miami Beach, Cooper City, North Miami, and Hollywood as well as Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department. AECOM has years of experience supporting Miami Beach in combating the effects of sea-level rise and evaluating opportunities to create a more resilient community. They have assisted Miami Beach in the development of the Resiliency Program, creating and executing codes and recommended actions to improve resilience;assisting in the adoption of revised ordinances;strengthening the City's programs as a part of the FEMA Community Resilience Score to reduce insurance costs; and assessment of the vulnerabilities and strengths of the CitVs assets to sea level rise. A key outcome is the Guidance Document on Sea Level Rise Vulnerability,which includes the Adaptation Decision- Making Assessment and Planning Tool(ADAPT). This tool provides the City with consolidated information and processes to use for building resilience strategies into City operations and capital investment decisions. Page 231 of 878 King Engineering Associates,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,King is a full-service consulting firm providing water, wastewater, and reclaimed water master planning and engineering services for governments and agencies throughout the state of Florida for 40 years. King staff has planned and designed over 500 miles of water and wastewater utility pipelines and supporting infrastructure of pump stations for municipal utilities throughout Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida. These pipelines have been constructed using a variety of methods including open cut, horizontal directional drill, micro-tunneling, jack and bore, auger boring, and subaqueous installations. Our installed pipe material has included ductile iron, PVC, HDPE, fiber glass, steel, and PCCP. King has also extensive experience in the rehabilitation of pipelines and pump stations. To upgrade and extend the useful life of pipelines we have used a variety of techniques including slip lining,pipe bursting,swage lining,folded liners,and cured in place liners. Local Firm! Local Team—King's services for assignments received under this contract will be executed from our well established Miami office which is located approximately 30 minutes away from Miami Beach. Wade Trim,Inc, According to the information provided by the firm, Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida consulting engineering firm helping local and regional governments create livable, sustainable communities through practical and innovative solutions.Starting in 1926,Wade Trim completed utility designs for municipalities.As work grew in response to changing client needs, our staff and offices have expanded to nearly 400 employees in 19 offices throughout the eastern United States.Wade Trim is consistently ranked among the top design and environmental firms and continues to be nationally recognized for innovative solutions. Nearly 90% of our business is from repeat clients, a testament to our commitment to client relationships. We are excited to expand our commitment to Miami Beach in resolving its infrastructure challenges. For nearly four years,Wade Trim has been at the forefront of Miami Beach's response to climate change and sea level rise.The first neighborhood to have elevated roadways and enhanced stormwater pumping systems implemented,Sunset Harbour was designed by Wade Trim.Since that time we have designed infrastructure improvements for Palm&Hibiscus Islands and Espanola Way, and are under contract for drainage, infrastructure, and streetscape improvements in the Citys high-profile 1st Street corridor. Wade Trim has not only remained on the leading edge of the City's sea level rise and resiliency technology,we have been active in educating the public and other stakeholders through presentations,technical papers,and events throughout Miami-Dade County. CQNCLUSION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen & Sawyer, as the top ranked and Prime Consultant. Through its proposal and presentation to the Evaluation Committee, 1-lazen&Sawyer has demonstrated its capacity and experience in water and wastewater systems. The firm has been awarded and performed well on a number of related contracts. Finally, Hazen & Sawyer provided a clear and detailed approach to how its services would benefit the City, including subject matter expertise,long range planning and potential cost savings. Additionally, I recommend the following firms five (5) firms, based on the City's anticipated needs and potential volume of work, be approved to participate in the pool of prequalified consultants, on a continuing basis pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, in order to Page 232 of 878 assure that the City's needs for engineering services is available expeditiously from firms qualified to perform the work: CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.,as the second ranked proposer, 300 Engineering Group,RA.,as the third ranked proposer,AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer, King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer, And Wade Trim,Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer for the pool of pre-qualified consultants. Finally, I further recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration, with the Prime Consultant and the pre-qualified firms. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services,determined upon successful negotiations,are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. Grant funding will not be utilized for this project. Legislative Tracking Public Works/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description o Attachment A--Evaluation Cot nrili Hee Scorings and Rankings Page 233 of 878 c =3 O o rf'I. v sn -:-L..:- k:o' .. , . . .0 . c ;.:21'.-tr-"7,1i..r-- fd s�(�tr?..�A tD r- CO cc, r. { Lii 'Q co1WN co r rA CVN P. �'d C4ft 4 uNi 2 CG d d 0 d 2 1 tti i 4 zanbart,•iAuueVJgtrn21a{`arte.Fa' rP-alt~oA tirte•.G22cro E crch,-,toN4:,t7o NC) 01 cor-O'1.DQ�n to id. , t ' i I ,iuiA><er.otrbrn2?r"'.13 t 142 n`t'.3 v F,c 4 v C N N r d a)'II)to v tri td)C31 m a:7 d'K ' w r i t 1 f N,,'tt SC QI 4, on co to 0 eV-•c,r r P K) a > 00 } coh j o - - : Jrntot- CCm (0%cr.CAC) Ii.'S:aG0 .,.$t :.{''efro'Tit. U,',g;',c(N M A M LPs 1.c?2 , 1 0 V'... Azi..-.';:::-,-;.,,,I,-.„ 8 , at '5.ll N i" .:� _ 2 E U Z.. W r: - c b Z CJ E_w.1 8 -fir' y.•~ v F ? :F CJ1 a w t± ,,rn � a.V o�.;. � � a g v• u z ydy z rp,•.r- W :L j'af g` ...,,g. d y em ? 2 N O r *14_,F ` ; ',.' ,!**":2 ':. J O ' OG (.4' 1 111 til 'i'-?s 71 I 6 4 = U ; 2 V ti Z 2 ce O W ±x. .fi z . z z 1 ,z,w `, ;a ..i a _ ,u z `1) .1 uliS, oc rrw z.sIg:wt-z 8 o ..!: wz .. 2 ,u3 N _v� .. C s • f t a r)0 aC V i 0 F o ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) P...—.,, MIAMI BEAC H City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS April 19, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Tuesday, April 25, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. II. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Pre-Submittal Meeting Sign In Sheet Exhibit B: 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: We recently submitted another proposal to the City on April 14 that required the Dun & Bradstreet report to be sent to the Procurement Contact. Do we need to submit this again or is there a form we can sign certifying the previous submission? Al: At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR). Q2: Does the prime responder have to show an employee as the Subject Matter Expert for all 8 categories or can we utilize a subconsultant for one or more categories? A2: Proposers must identify and submit evidence for Subject Matter Expert(s) Key Personnel. The RFQ does not require the subject matter experts to be employees. Q3: There seems to be a duplication in the 8 categories of work listed on page 15 unless the first 4 refer to the planning aspects of the project and the last 4 refer to the design work. Is that a correct interpretation of what the City meant? A3: There is no duplication. The City is seeking expertise that includes design capabilities and other non-design expertise in a subject area. The expert may be the 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS same person or different people in the same discipline, for example an experienced water operator may serve as the water distribution expert for matters that do not require a P.E.'s design expertise, or a P.E. with operational expertise may serve both functions. Q4: I am writing to respectfully request a two (2) week extension to the response deadline for RFQ 2017-129KB - Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater System Projects. A4: Please refer to time extension above. Q5: Since a Water and Wastewater Master Plan will be developed under Item III of the RFQ Statement of Work Required (page 29), and such Master Plans may affect the 20-year CIPs developed under Items I and II, wouldn't it make more sense to develop initially a first phase 5-year CIP (with the most urgent and immediate projects) and then, after the Master Plan is done (possibly 1 to 2 years after program start) amend the CIP as needed and make it a 20-year CIP (as requested)with the projects identified in the Master Plan? A5: Please refer to Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications, Subsection C2 "The services described in items I, and II are intended to be awarded immediately. The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future." Items I and II would become the system plan if item Ill is not authorized. Q6: What planning horizon should be covered under the Master Plan, since already the CIP is for a considerably long term (20 years)? For example, 30, 40, 50 years? A6: The expected life of the existing assets. Q7: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide land acquisition services in relation to the CIP projects it designs? A7: Not at this time. Q8: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide permitting services for the CIP projects it plans and designs? A8: Permitting services are not specifically identified in this RFQ; however the selected firm(s) under items III, V, VI, or VIII could be tasked with those services if offered. Q9: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide procurement assistance services for the CIP projects it plans and designs? If so, what level of assistance? A9: Procurement assistance is not specifically identified in this RFQ; however the selected firm(s) under items V, VI, VII, or VIII could be tasked with those services if offered. Q10: The RFQ Statement of Work Required lists "Value Engineering" as one of the possible services to be contracted. Since design is one of the services that may also be contracted, is it envisioned that some designs will not be performed by the Prime Consultant but rather by the consultants on the pre-qualified pool? Is there an idea of how much design work would be self-performed versus performed by the pool of consultants? 2 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS A10: The services may be performed by a single selectee, or any combination of selectees at the City's discretion. No estimates are currently available to describe amounts to be self-performed. Q11: The present email is to ask if the results of the Supplier Qualification Report (SQR by Dun & Bradstreet) are required for the proposal submittal or the confirmation of the SQR request suffices. All: Please refer to response Al above. Q12: Could you please provide a City of Miami Beach water and wastewater system description, including miles of pipeline and number and description of other system assets? Al2: Items I, and II include the development of inventories. An conceptual estimate is 4 water storage tanks, 180 miles of water lines, 152 miles of sewer lines, 33 pumping stations, 1,000 fire hydrants, 86 water crossings, 20 MGD to 25 MGD water and wastewater distribution/collection. Q13: Please confirm that no pricing or costing of services is required to be submitted with the response to the RFQ and that these would be negotiated with the selected respondent later on. A13: Cost of services is not a requirement of this RFQ, fees will be negotiated during the negotiation phase. Q14: Typically, a Master Plan (MP) precedes the Capital Investment Program (CIP) design. The MP looks at long term goals and projections (usually over a > 20 years) and then those are translated into projects that make up the CIP. The CIP is a comprehensive list of projects (a project inventory) that are scheduled and ordered depending on constraints (for example, execution or funding constraints). The RFQ, on the other hand, has CIP design as the first tasks. Is the thought that the CIPs developed under The Statement of Work Requirement section of the RFQ, item C2(I) and (II) (page 28 of the RFQ) be prepared as an inventory of information gathered from available sources, but later updated when the Master Plan is prepared? Can the logical order of the scope of work be altered so that MP comes first, in order to be more efficient? A14: Statements are well received and understood. The City anticipates significant immediate needs, and does not have the luxury of developing a master planning document prior to identifying most important projects due to timing restraints of capital markets. The City reserves the discretion to task the selectee(s) with any task without consideration to the order listed if deemed to be in its best interest as determined by the City. Q15: The CIP Development tasks require that all parts of the system be documented, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. What level of granular detail is 3 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS the City of Miami Beach looking for? For example, should all sewer manholes be inspected? Should every mile of sewer be inspected with CCTV or other technologies? Should water mains and other underground water infrastructure be inspected with the use of invasive technology (for example)? A15: The City expects the selectee(s) to review existing information, and recommend what efforts are needed to develop the capital improvement prioritization. Considering the recommendations negotiations will take place for the task(s). Q16: Have there been any water or wastewater infrastructure assessments performed in the past that can be provided? A16: Please see response A15 above. Q17: he Statement of Work Required states under the CIP Development tasks that "The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work". Does the City know what are the constraints for execution that would define the schedule of implementation? For example, is there a yearly CIP budget limit? A17: The City's goal of item I, and II is to understand needs based on a priority developed with a matrix that includes likelihood, and consequence of failure. The City will then determine the prudent level of spending that will determine the exact time horizon. Q18: Are there combined sewers or documented cross connections between storm and sanitary sewers? A18: None are known. Q19: Are storm sewers part of the scope of work? A19: No. Q20: Is there a Master Plan for the City and if so, can it be provided? A20: A current master plan for water and wastewater is not available. Q21: Can you please provide any existing expansion or growth plans for the water or wastewater systems? A21: The City is considered largely built out, and expansion likelihood is limited. Q22: Can you provide a list of water and wastewater pump stations and their capacity? A22: Please refer to response Al2 above. Q23: Can you provide water and wastewater system maps of major infrastructure? 4 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS A23: Please refer to response Al2 above, and all existing GIS mapping will be provided to selectee(s). Q24: For the design scope of services, is the selected Prime Consultant expected to execute 100% design documents or will the Prime Consultant be providing preliminary design (say 30% design) for other Pre-Qualified Consultants from the Consultants Pool to execute to 100% under Prime Consultant review and supervision? A24: It is the City's option to task any consultant(s) with any level of service and negotiate pricing based on level of service. Q25: Is there a sub-consultant minimum set aside? Are there any set-aside requirements for minorities, women or other disadvantaged businesses? A25: There are no set-aside requirements. Q26: Can you provide a detail age, material and miles of pipe for the water system? A26: Please refer to response Al 2 and A23 above. Q27: Can you provide a detail age, material and miles of pipe for the wastewater system? A27: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q28: Given the short time frame (particularly there are only ten days after questions are answered), will the City of Miami Beach consider providing more time and extending the deadline to respond to the RFQ? A28: Please refer to time extension above. Q29: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's pressure reducing valves (PRVs) and pressure sustaining valves (PSVs)? Are these inspected and maintained on a regular basis? A29: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q30: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's fire hydrants? Are these inspected and maintained on a regular basis? A30: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q31: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's control valves? Are these exercised on a regular basis? A31: Please refer to response Al 2 and A23 above. Q32: Are wholesale water meters from transfers from the MDWASD system the City of Miami Beach responsibility? Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's wholesale water meters? A32: Wholesale meters are owned and maintained by MDWASD. Also please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. 5 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Q33: Are there any wholesale wastewater flow meters to measure wastewater transfers to MDWASD? Are these the City of Miami Beach responsibility? Can you provide an inventory and map of the wastewater collection system flow meters? A33: Please refer to response A32 above. Q34: Can you supply or let us know where to get the SE Florida Climate Change Compact Planning Tool referred to in page 3 of the RFQ? A34: Please refer to Exhibit B additionally, all compact resources can be found here: http://www.southeastfioridaclimatecompact.org/ . Q35: Can you provide a guideline of the amount of Design work this RFQ may require? A35: Estimates are not available. Q36: You stated in the pre-bid meeting that the City is a Waste water collector and a water distributor. We have seen that the County may be looking into Pre-Treatment Facilities, do you foresee any pretreatment VVWTP within the jurisdiction of Miami Beach? A36: The City is unaware of any pre-treatment plans. Q37: Can you provide or guide us into demographics, growth rate of population and City construction projects in the permit pipeline? A37: The City's CAFR located on City's website is the best information source we have available for this information. Q38: Can you identify any particular areas that will need to be prioritized due to excess growth impacting both systems? A38: Not at this time. Q39: Can we use 11 x 17 page sizing for the organizational chart? A39: Yes. • Q40: Page 14, 2.2.1 — please clarify what is the difference between the Experts and the Design Engineer. We are not clear as to what you are looking for with these two similar designations. A40: Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individual(s) who as proposed will be selected to serve as the Subject Matter Expert(s). Also please refer to response A3 above. Q41: Will the City post a sign in sheet from the pre-bid conference for the above reference RFQ? A41: Please refer to Exhibit A. Q42: Are any restrictions on the same firm developing the CIP, performing design, and 6 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS providing construction management and inspection services on the same project. A42: No. Q43: There was no reasonable measures Application attached to the RFP per Page 21 - Appendix A. A43: Reasonable measures application will be provided by the City during proposal submittals review to proposers which cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage). Q44: Per page 15, 2.3 Financial Capacity states "At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report." Does that mean we need to submit it with our proposal or to inform us it may be requested at another time. If we do need to submit the report, will the information be treated as confidential information? A44: The City will request the Supplier Qualification Report from Dun & Bradstreet directly from the prospective proposer upon receipt of proposal submittal. Q45: Do we need to provide a copy of our insurance certificate? A45: No, certificate of insurance will be requested at time of contract execution. Q46: Page 28, Cl, #2 —what information are you requesting to be submitted for "the volume of contract"? A46: Please include the dollar amount of the task. Q47: On Page 28, C2. Statement of Work Required. Please confirm that there is no submittal requirement for this section. A47: There is no submittal requirement for C2. Statement of Work Required (p. 28). Q48: Would the City consider extending the opening date of the solicitation? A48: Please refer to time extension above. Q48: Please clarify the role of the pool of pre-qualified consultants. We are looking to be a sub- consultant, as we do not have the qualifications to be a prime. Does that mean that we can submit our qualifications to this RFQ anyway, and note that we are submitting for the pool? Can we also team with a Prime, or will the Prime only be able to choose from the pool to use as their subs? A48: Proposers not selected as prime consultant(s) will qualify to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. 7 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Q49: Are there any restrictions of solicitation? A49: Please refer to response A42 above. Q50: What is the time period of the contract for the prime consultant chosen? A50: Term of contract shall be for a period of three (3) years with two (2) additional one(1) year renewal options. Q51: What is the contract capacity for the prime consultant? A51: As such, the scope or value of the work awarded to the prime consultant shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes. Q52: Is there a current CIP master available through the net? A52: No Q53: Are there any drawings of the area such as pump stations locations available? A53: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q54: If a consultant submits to the pool are they allowed to be selected as the prime? A54: Please refer to response to A48 above. Q55: Can a firm submit to the pool and not the prime? A55: Please refer to response to A48 above. Q56: Will the City hire more than one prime for the CIP plan? A56: While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant, it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest. Q57: Will the pool of consultants help to develop the CIP plan along with the prime consultant that is chosen? A57: The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. Q58: If you perform the design work what is the rule on the construction side of the project? A58: Please refer to response to A42 above. Q59: Will the City consider a team that does not meet all minimum requirements as a prime consultant? A59: Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to 8 I ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.qov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada ; 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sl 1-44k lex Den.. ••• ement Director MINSWOWNIINNOMMI 9 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Exhibit A Pre-Submittal Meeting Sign In Sheet 1 10 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS A \4' 1\ BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Kristy Bada Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 ext. 6218 kristvbadaamiamibeachtl.f.zov ) iCC e We,A J (14/8 )2_)2e9 cy6e, - Fev--ylet, vl do S b S Cert,ts,1-4-0,,43 3or SOS--6400 irvt",yitio 01-4A-Q-2. s (-4.10(0(1 Czi, S eCi -c111 'ICS/ e c",tickil,,c@ s As. g5k---6-.4co S,-,10, i1 kCcc- (1-Tiani S\ioc,,n 1441012-3 as\.1/4iGkiv02-yy0;kv4s-,.uix:IA.cciAA Sac- Pe/w n 4477 6(7/77 ez ff,t)e,m.i ./rIcz.e/y64.00 cofp, E I 1-6,5 5 El alt47 ce) 305- eI1 el fid Ns,soci a Ae 3-e—q5 gg - 3loo Fjpge)..i0 2/eptioial.Z. ./Ve /7CW)de ,lied/-7ssecievieszeri C(4/A11 aar 74)6-6 , e C6 if-SiVai2 0645, aor Cat(t,tio t IQ Cite 4 ao ' ctio- , o liAemci)0 64,4/0, c,A)A,t, /660 \,C, r\ , e cescori ,sJ-\- 3Qa()?3c%1 ,\A I „A i\s\\ B E AC H CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS • e•in mcor+i'vNtz. c sa5iro Lte.co ll.:1°s- "1 5414 306-- 4 GI-5.444 A,Ap4. 1'1\1E4- 1'87-4324-0645 'Rope AGcovt4 , \144Lif.i4ts ERoledr.c.WI t,Li CAMS&retell•Ccnvi lif-t oq-c 310 ' i4vy0,4 4 . everite3 1-4>k 4,6 305% 618,39/4 ,--• K 164o IV.. r7a-t,0 HA le-5 . ni67- -7 S.to •2.2/.2-406i •Qt,')C neidt-S 04.54 *.iris,,fro give iede-c e.s et,.co vp. k-51\* 6), GAA/2.-- 6cor,4 t•Joebi Am ..gie jeA- aoczirs-k2ao/ v'civuz-6)crrie—Iti44,,, Cow) LiATY'e- ---rg ,,,--, 0.on 'c.). Sok n.sto 0 8 ,,-- r e, ip\ 1-e c ti , 3°s,:2,1-. di anck . 5eirOcki-0-4-€T e.:-k-a\if c in-c,D en Cy?--ESToP t-IEZ Tcrait -r-e-cki So 5 -cto8- 7.AVATSKN' CAR-is-2)7Ru. zA‘t,1/41- KyQ1-E-Tre..A.TEci-t.(t).ti juce,t, # lkiii.de -- g i .8,e A.,A,,,, & . C,:, t.r.cA - 7 7 21 .4z? -?nei 0 ILI 56 14-Aiz ice) n, Aie4-6,1 A',..c4 —3 e•ca,...,c, 4,1,A 0 c,,,.e, 00,0e4ertsg..4.40-I Q.."..19.,,, a q tql< Gen Z__. f..)C\ ( Ccao n5'0 3 idge -23151 't(?.....e k40C-c.....-e4T, co vv1/4.. -s -2 / YTS A--Y v 1 fij .Ktii liv) loi"t:s km,,„/ RP c`cm --1-4-etc, -s Tyl c ?a-c-S V „ec/ 1 oki(Cip 4/7,4/1 cE=41 ri-t"iTtl 2 ga-C-3711-)/11 2b6--.3:77. eito \\ , \ L CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS D I/5 .z,i9111/41-iL.: 44 dar it4.0chtit kgce Loam -1155 Lects' tic,sos 3346 oe-A-V, ch_Qclvotrail-&-aoRACKuit,-404r. a)o . :*71(119k:vt-tt 1/1,149 eat'-- Svc foo.itto esza:26., OMA t (1. Atilk 3oo tit5, vtavtit& z 05%lit 3DC (.93 (3 0), t; 01) G34)0Q iilltottvlorsm tAedA jv\CLA ViLtdi te,rik 31‘4C ?1O<SbailhIC cliAPAC YV b - EtA S • r6 %PO 'S!-Ss.Z**W1 N 4-SCAT ti-pRt 1617 al-DT 7-1;7k f irolo (099 16-J94179 , £f617. II, 3 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS o CMS f-ai C\fstelletS treS1-6 Bac!Y)catort- COh Peivevi.J, Cotil (-17- 1\4413vtdot Lut cA 6rno CO tei Pt,v--e-trtm oas Tir 14D k,\ Y,Yorrktys' eovt ce. c4:t v\iacL( P4P(t1 Coil {Hice, CA ) 1 e-/ 161 Etn 011'vv. c04 Cal \ AG'C 0114.. MAW- ;Mom()em CoA C21. 1. ) Cti\va Moolft, Assoc-. JOS 1 COO Cta 0,06tS t'oj c- IStititry) Lte, 000 Lyn,i‘ ( iEl Sam PI 4 Exhibit B 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection 1 11 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS I " B E AC 1-1 MEMORANDUM TO: Management Team FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager .•• �+r'' DATE: March 23, 2016 SUBJECT: 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Project' n BACKGROUND We are taking aggressive action across the City today to address sea level rise, from stormwater projects to land use amendments. We are also planning for the future and developing a citywide Resiliency Strategy. The purpose of this memorandum is to make sure that all staff is aware of and utilizing the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's Unified Sea Level Rise Projection. The projection was updated in October of 2015 and adopted by our City Commission at the March 9, 2016 meeting. It is an excellent planning tool with accompanying guidance and training. The projection is required to be used for relevant planning and construction throughout all departments. The following is a list of key programs that are to incorporate the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection: • The scope of Procurement solicitations; • Capital Improvement Projects (CIP planning)for all departments; • Public Works projects; • Transportation projects; and • Additional projects and programs as appropriate. UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION OVERVIEW The updated Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida projects the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100. The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1. Short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level. 2. Medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean sea level. 3. Long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea level. SLR Projection March 23, 2016 Page 2 of 3 so Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) 70 i PCC ARS > Year Median USACE High NO'-A High 3 (inches) (Inches) (inches) ns c 5( CiS m 2030 6 10 12 40 2060 14 26 34 * 2100 31 61 81 ra Ri2,0 r• ,. > v 7 ti :". �- 14" • • cc •" 10 -"''' --- .'sacs iitam,eaia,e,4,A.a°.-;rerrned,;tt bow 0 w.. 1092 2000 2.20 202020:.'0 20402050 20b0 2:10 20K: 2:.;90 2100 Year Figure 1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the iPCC ARS RCP8.5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve),the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100.The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions In greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. The lower boundary of the projection (dashed line) can be applied in designing low risk projects that are easily replaceable with short design lives, are adaptable and have limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services. The shaded zone is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short-term planning horizon. It reflects what the Work Group projects will be the most likely range of sea level rise for the remainder of the 21st Century. The upper curve of the projection should be utilized for planning of high risk and critical infrastructure projects. TRAINING AND RESOURCES Integrating the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection into planning and operations is vital, citywide. In the 2016 Management Team survey on Sustainability and Resiliency, feedback included more than 100 ideas, including continuing with planning and codifying (18), increasing staff awareness and staff(11), and developing specific ways for departments and employees to help (4). Sea Level Rise Projection training was provided for City staff on March 14th, 2016 by Dr. Samantha Danchuk from Broward County, who served as lead staff to the Compact working group. Dr. Danchuck presented how the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection was developed utilizing the most recent science, how to understand and use the different planning horizons based on the type of project and location, and shared guidance resources. The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection and Guidance will be updated every five to seven years to account for the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to global climate change. SLR Projection March 23, 2016 Page 3 of 3 For additional information and resources: • The March 14th Unified Sea Level Rise Projection training video can be viewed on MBTV at: http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T03249&video=269185 • The 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, including guidance in applying the projections, is available on the Compact website at: http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-Compact- Unified-Sea-Level-Rise-Proiection.pdf • City of Miami Beach Resolution 2016-29317 is available at: http://miamibeach1315jwebLink/PDF/zlh2klozitpi3tjddg54axg0/3/2016-29317%20Reso.pdf With professionalism, experience, and innovation, we will make the most of these excellent resources. We will continue to plan effectively now and in the future. Please contact Susanne M. Torriente, Chief Resiliency Officer, with any questions or comments with regards to this memorandum. SMT/AK/ESW UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION SOUTH EAST FLORIDA k‘\‘` " October 2015 Prepared by the Sea Level Rise Work Group CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida 4 Projection and Summary 4 Projection Development Methodology 6 Projection Update 6 Guidance for Application 9 Increase in Recurrent Flooding and Reduced Drainage Capacity 9 Storm Surge and Sea Level Rise 10 Natural Resource Degradation 10 Guidance in Applying The Projections 11 Audiences 11 Applying Projection Curves to Infrastructure Siting And Design 11 Available Vulnerability Assessments 13 Summary 13 Literature Cited 15 Appendix A:Stand Alone Guidance Document and Projection 21 Appendix B:State of Science Update 26 Acceleration of Sea Level Rise 26 Factors Influencing Sea Level Rise 26 Global Processes 26 Regional/Local Processes 28 Appendix C:Workgroup Commentary and Recommendations 33 Appendix D:Acknowledgement of Participants 34 Appendix E: Deviation from 2011 Projection 35 Recommended Citation Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Work Group (Compact). October 2015. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 35 p. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact reconvened the Sea Level Rise Work Group for the purpose of updating the unified regional projection based on global projections, guidance documents and scientific literature released since the original regional projection in 2011 (Compact, 2011). The objective of the unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast Florida region remains consistent that the projection is for use by the Climate Compact Counties and partners for planning purposes to aid in understanding of potential vulnerabilities and to provide a basis for developing risk informed adaptation strategies for the region. For the 2015 update, the starting point for all sea level rise projections has been shifted from 2010 to 1992. This allows for direct use of local tide station information to convert projections into local water surface elevations for flood vulnerability studies, and is consistent with current guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). The Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida has also been extended to 2100 in recognition of the need for longer range guidance for major infrastructure and other long term investments now being planned. In the short term, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches by 2030 and 14 to 26 inches by 2060 (above the 1992 mean sea level). In the long term, sea level rise isro'ected to be 31 to p � 61 inches by 2100. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper cirve is recommended with planning values of 34 inches in 2060 and 81 inches in 2100. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory (2015) has reported the average global sea level has risen almost 3 inches between 1992 and 2015 based on satellite measurements. Sea level rise in South Florida has been of similar magnitude over the same period (NOAA, 2015) but is anticipated to outpace the global average due to ongoing variations in the Florida Currents and Gulf Stream. Projected sea level rise, especially by 2060 and beyond, has a significant range of variation as a result of uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions and their geophysical effects, the incomplete quantitative understanding of all geophysical processes that might affect the rate of sea level rise in climate models and the limitations of current climate models to predict the future. As such, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection include three curves, in descending order, the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve and a curve corresponding to the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to how and when they should be used in planning. This guidance document describes the recommended application of the projection as it relates to both high and low risk projects and short and long- term planning efforts. Also, the Work Group recommends that thisuidance be updated every p 1 five to seven years because of the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to global climate change and potential impacts. INTRODUCTION WHO SHOULD USE THIS PROJECTION AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENT? The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to both short and long-term planning horizons and infrastructure design in the Southeast Florida area. HOW SHOULD THE REGIONAL PROJECTION BE APPLIED? The projection (Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida)contains a graph and table describing the rise in sea level from 1992 through the turn of the current century.The projection can be used to estimate future sea level elevations in Southeast Florida and the relative change in sea level from today to a point in the future. Guidance for Application contains directions and specific examples of how the projection can be used by local governments, planners, designers and engineers and developers. This regional projection is offered to ensure that all major infrastructure projects throughout the Southeast Florida region have the same basis for design and construction relative to future sea level. WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH SEA LEVEL RISE? The consequences associated with sea level rise include direct physical impacts such as coastal inundation of inland areas, increased frequency of flooding in vulnerable coastal areas, increased flooding in interior areas due to impairment of the region's stormwater infrastructure i.e.impacts to gravity drainage systems and features in the regional water management canal system, saltwater intrusion into the aquifer and local water supply wells, and contamination of the land and ocean with pollutants and debris and hazardous materials released by flooding. Consequences also include cascading socio-economic impacts such as displacement, decrease in property values and tax base, increases in insurance costs, loss of services and impaired access to infrastructure.The likelihood and extent to which these impacts will occur is dependent upon the factors influencing the rate of sea level rise such as the amount of greenhouse gases emitted globally, rate of melting of land-based ice sheets, the decisions and investments made by communities to increase their climate resilience and the many interconnected processes described in the Appendix B: State of Science Update. One of the values of this sea level rise projection is the ability to perform scenario testing to better understand the potential impacts and timeline of sea level rise within the Southeast Florida community. 2 WHO DEVELOPED THE UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA? In 2010, the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee organized the first Regional Climate Change Compact Technical Ad hoc Work Group (Work Group). Their objective was to develop a unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast Florida region for use by the Climate Compact Counties and partners. Its primary use was for planning purposes to aid in understanding of potential vulnerabilities and to provide a basis for outlining adaptation strategies for the region. The Work Group reviewed existing projections and scientific literature and developed a unified regional projection for the period from 2010 to 2060 (Compact, 2011). The projection highlighted two planning horizons: 1) by 2030, sea level rise was projected to be 3 to 7 inches above the 2010 mean sea level and 2) by 2060, sea level rise was projected to be 9 to 24 inches above the 2010 mean sea level. In anticipation of the release of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2013), the Sea Level Rise Work Group recommended a review of the projection four years after its release in 2011. In September 2014, the Sea Level Rise Work Group was reconvened for the purpose of updating the unified regional projection based on projections and scientific literature released since 2011. This report released in October 2015 contains a summary of the projections and publications reviewed and discussed, the methodology for deriving the projection, the recommended unified regional projection and additional recommendations from the Sea Level Rise Work Group. 3 UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA PROJECTION AND SUMMARY This Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida updated in 2015 projects the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 1). The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1) short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level, 2) medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean sea level, 3) long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea level. Projected sea level rise in the medium and long term has a significant range of variation as a result of uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions and their geophysical effects, the incomplete quantitative understanding of all geophysical processes affecting the rate of sea level rise in climate models and current limitations of climate models to predict the future. As such, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection include three global mean sea level rise curves regionally adapted to account for the acceleration of sea level change observed in South Florida. The titles of the global mean sea level rise curves were retained for simplicity of referencing source but the curves have been adjusted from the global projections to reflect observed local change. The projection consists of the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve (also known as the NOAA Intermediate- High) and the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to how and when they should be used in planning. • The lower boundary of the projection (blue dashed line) can be applied in designing low risk projects that are easily replaceable with short design lives, are adaptable and have limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services. • The shaded zone between the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 median curve and the USACE High is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short-term planning horizon. It reflects what the Work Group projects will be the most likely range of sea level rise for the remainder of the 21st Century. • The upper curve of the projection should be utilized for planning of high risk projects to be constructed after 2060 or projects which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years) or are critically interdependent with other infrastructure or services. 4 ` ; Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) 7'-) L.,'" i PCC ARS USACE High NOAA High wYear Median (inches) (inches) (inches) c) 2030 6 10 12 .ui 2 40 2060 14 26 34 > ' 2100 31 61 81 ro 26" CLQ .) -.r ` � � k r!.. r--z...1^ , ! -.w r f • 10 ,,,..,�, M------,- fi_JSAC E,nt r edLLte/PIOAA,intermediate Low Gil , ~ ! r ;•;:,,:� riper J mow---- 0 1992 20(X} 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2000 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year Figure 1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC ARS RCP8.5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve),the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100.The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. 5 PROJECTION DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY PROJECTION UPDATE The key components of the methodology used to develop the unified sea level rise projection are as follows: Planning Horizon of 2100: In response to the release of climate scenarios extending to year 2100 from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), projections through year 2100 by federal agencies including the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the need for planning for infrastructure with design lives greater than 50 years,the unified sea level rise projection time scale has been extended to 2100. IA/ft/tiItiIM' Starting in 1992: The year 1992 has been selected as the initial year of the projection because it is the center of the current mean sea level National Tidal Datum Epoch of 1983- 2001. A tidal datum epoch is a 19 year period adopted by the National Ocean Service as the official time segment over which tide observations are used to establish tidal datums such as mean sea level, mean high water etc. The National Tidal Datum Epoch is revised every 20-25 years to account for changing sea levels and land elevations. Tide gauge selection:The Key West gauge (NOAA Station ID 8724580) was maintained as the reference gauge for calculation of the regional projection as was used in the original projection. In addition, appropriate conversion calculations are provided in Section 4: Guidance for Application in order to reference the projection to the Miami Beach gauge (NOAA Station ID 8723170)or the Lake Worth Pier gauge (NOAA Station ID 8722670).The Key West gauge has recorded tidal elevations since 1913.Tidal records from Miami Beach and Lake Worth Pier are available since 2003 and 1996, respectively. Review of existing projections:Global projections released since 2011 were reviewed and considered for interpretation for the unified sea level rise projection including those developed by USACE (2011; 2013), NOAA(Parris et al., 2012), IPCC (IPCC, 2013), Bamber and Aspinall (2013), Horton et al. (2014), Jevrejeva et al. (2014), and Kopp et al. (2014). Review criteria included comprehensiveness of datasets and models used to develop the projections, standing in the scientific community, and applicability to the Southeast Florida region. 6 Summaries of the existing global projections are included below: ❖ USACE Guidance: There was no update to the projections since 2011 (USAGE, 2011). The range of global mean sea level change projected by USACE was approximately 0.2 to 0.6 meters(9 to 25 inches)by 2060 and 0.5 to 1.5 meters(20 to 59 inches) by 2100. Existing guidance and the online USAGE Sea Level Change Calculator were used to adapt the global mean sea level change curves for the unified South Florida projection. ':• IPCC ARS Projections: The 5th Assessment Report (ARS) included four scenarios based on predicted greenhouse gas concentration trajectories (Regional Concentration Pathways, RCPs). The global mean sea level change projected in these scenarios ranged from 0.17 to 0.38 meters(7 to 15 inches)by years 2046 to 2065 and 0.26 to 0.82 meters (10 to 32 inches)by 2081 to 2100. ':' NOAA Projections produced for the National Climate Assessment (NCA): For the 2014 NCA, four global mean sea level rise scenarios were defined in a manner allowing the user to select the appropriate curve based on risk of concern, uncertainty tolerance and type of application. The global mean sea level rise projected in these scenarios ranges from 0.2 meters to 2 meters(8 to 80 inches)by 2100. ':' Recent Probabilistic Projections:Recently, several authors have quantitatively and qualitatively approached determining the likelihood or percent chance that the global mean sea level rise projections will occur by 2100. For example, based on a probability density function, Jevrejeva et al. (2014) concluded that there is only a 5%chance global mean sea level rise will be larger than 1.8 meters(71 inches) by 2100. Using an alternate method, Kopp et al. (2014)concluded there is only a 5% chance global mean sea level rise will be larger than 1.76 meters(69 inches). These studies represent examples of possible methods of further explaining applicability of projections for future use. ':' Science Community Polling: Several polls have been conducted amongst groups within the scientific community to understand the experts'opinions on the level of uncertainty associated with existing global mean sea level rise projections. These surveys have yielded reported likely ranges of global mean sea level rise of 0.4 to 1.2 m (16 to 42 inches) depending on warming scenarios (Horton et al., 2014) and 0.29 m to 0.84 m (11 to 33 inches) (Bamber and Aspinall, 2013)by 2100. 7 g ' .. fR ' Projection confidence: The understanding of past sea level changes has improved since the Work Group's last review due to additional observations and analyses of processes driving thermal expansion, loss of ice from ice sheets and glaciers and terrestrial water storage by the scientific community. Despite this improved understanding, the development of complex climate models is evolutionary and many processes and responses are yet to be incorporated. The numerous ice melt accelerating feedbacks not in the models are especially of concern as they are speeding up ice melt and sea level rise well beyond model projections. Models do continue to offer useful approximations of trends and order of magnitude of rates of change and acceleration based on climate data input and are suitable for determining projected future ranges for planning and design efforts. Additionally, as noted in Parris et al. (2012), the quadratic curves comprising the projection were selected by the some of the scientific community for simplicity. Sea level will not rise in the smooth manner illustrated by the quadratic curves but, may be punctuated by faster and slower rates (Parris et al., 2013). 8 GUIDANCE FOR APPLICATION INCREASE IN RECURRENT FLOODING AND REDUCED DRAINAGE CAPACITY ...... .. . ...... Recent analyses of tide gauge records acquired along the US Atlantic coast indicate a rapid acceleration in the rate of sea level rise since 2000, which was attributed to possible slowing down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) (Ezer et al., 2013; Sallenger et al., 2012;Yin et al., 2009).The higher sea level resulted in increasing flooding frequency in several coastal communities, e.g., Boston, Norfolk, and Miami Beach (Ezer et al., 2013; Kirshen et al., 2008; Kleinosky et al., 2007; Wdowinski et al., 2015). These frequent flood events, often termed "nuisance flooding", occur mainly due to heavy rain during high tide conditions but sometimes occur due to high tide alone and are termed "King tides","lunar flooding"or"sunny sky flooding". Recently, Ezer and Atkinson (2014) used tide gauge data to calculate accumulated flooding time in twelve locations along the Atlantic coast and showed a significant increase in flooding duration over the past twenty years. They suggested that flood duration is a reliable indicator for the accelerating rate of sea level rise, which is often difficult to estimate on a regional-scale. On the national scale, NOAA (2014) published an assessment of nuisance flooding finding that the duration and frequency of these events are intensifying around the United States. Subsequently, Sweet and Park (2014) demonstrated that coastal areas are experiencing an increased frequency of flood events (an acceleration) over the last few decades, and that this acceleration in flood occurrence will continue regardless of the specific rate of sea level rise. A detailed analysis of nuisance flooding occurrence in Miami Beach was conducted by Wdowinski et al. (2015),who used a variety of data sources(tide gauge, rain gauge, media reports, insurance claims, and photo records) from the past 16 years (1998-2013). They found that most flooding- events occur after heavy rain (> 80 mm, 3 inches) during high tide conditions, but also after the fall equinox tides regardless of rain events. An analysis of flooding frequency over the past 16 years revealed that since 2006, rain-induced events increased by 33% and tide-induced events quadrupled, from 2 events during 1998-2005 to 8-16 events in 2006-2013. Wdowinski et al. (2015) also analyzed the nearby Virginia Key tide gauge record and found a significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise since 2006. The average rate of regional sea level rise since 2006 is 9±4 mm/yr, significantly higher than the global average rate of 2.8±0.4 mm/yr estimated from in-situ data (Church and White, 2011). Although the Work Group notes that continued analysis of changes in trends over time is necessary to determine long-term significance of this recently observed uptrend, studies have already begun to correlate the regional sea level rise to the slowing down of the Gulfstream. A comparison between sea level variations near Miami with high-resolution global climate model simulations (Kirtman et al., 2012) revealed a strong correlation between increasing sea level rise in the Miami area and a 9 weakening of the Florida Current-Gulf Stream system.This finding confirmed concurs with other studies that relate sea level rise acceleration along the US Atlantic coast with weakening of the Gulf Stream (e.g., Ezer et al., 2013; Park and Sweet, 2015). ... . ... .... .. .... STORM SURGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE Storm surge and sea level rise are independent coastal processes that when occurring simultaneously lead to compounded impacts. Sea level rise will increase the inland areal extent inundated by surges, the depth of flooding and power of the surge and the extent and intensity of damage associated with storm surge and waves. As a result, severe storms of the future will cause more damage than storms of equal intensity occurring at today's sea level. Tebaldi et al. (2012) estimate a 100-year magnitude surge flooding (by today's standards) will begin to occur every 20 years at the projected mean sea level in 2050. Regional hazard mapping does not yet include the combined effects of sea level rise and surge but the impacts are anticipated to be significant. Historically, the sea level extremes have increased along with the increase in mean sea level at locations along the coasts. Using this as the basis, one can relate the sea level extremes to mean sea level which allows the determination of future extremes and return periods(Obeysekera and Park, 2013). Another approach is to use the non-tidal residuals (component of storm surge and waves above the tidal variations), NTR, and determine their probabilistic characteristics. Assuming future sea level rise scenarios and the tidal variations, one can then superimpose extreme storm surge of NTR for a given return period to determine total sea level extreme for a given time epoch in the future. Return period for a given scenario can be determined using methods outlined in Salas and Obeysekera (2014). Both approaches assume there is no change in future "storminesss" although with higher sea levels, magnitude of storm surge may change at some locations along the coasts. NATURAL RESOURCE DEGRADATION As sea level rise increasingly inundates coastal areas, there is the potential for degradation of natural resources and loss of their services to the surrounding environment. Ecosystems will transition either by retreat and migration, adaptation, or elimination of functions and certain species. Shallow water habitats may transition to open water, forcing ecological changes in coastal wetlands and estuaries affecting nesting, spawning and feeding locations and behavior. Intrusion of saltwater inland, into inland water bodies and within the aquifer is negatively impacting freshwater resources, and these impacts will worsen or accelerate with further sea level rise. Inundation of shorelines will increase the extent and severity of beach erosion and 10 previously stable coastal areas. In combination, these impacts will cascade throughout the region's ecosystems even if they are not immediately adjacent to open water areas. Natural infrastructure is critical to the resilience of the urban environment, in that it provides many benefits related to storm protection, water and air purification, moderating urban heat effects, and socio-economics. South Florida's tourist economy is heavily dependent on these natural resources.The region must prioritize providing space for habitat transitions and focus on reducing anthropogenic pressures that would compound the degrading effects of sea level rise. GUIDANCE IN APPLYING THE PROJECTIONS AUDIENCES The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to both short and long-term planning horizons as well as infrastructure siting and design in the Southeast Florida area. Potential audiences for the projections include, but are not limited to, elected officials, urban planners,architects,engineers,developers, resource managers and public works professionals. One of the key values of the projection is the ability to associate specific sea level rise scenarios with timelines. When used in conjunction with vulnerability assessments, these projections inform the user of the potential magnitude and extent of sea level rise impact at a general timeframe in the future.The blue shaded portion of the projection provides a likely range for sea level rise values at specific planning horizons. Providing a range instead of a single value may present a challenge to users such as engineers who are looking to provide a design with precise specifications. Public works professionals and urban planners need to work with the engineers and with policy makers to apply the projection to each project based on the nature, value, interconnectedness, and life cycle of the infrastructure proposed. Finally, elected officials should use the projections to inform decision making related to issues such as adaptation policies, budget impacts associated with design features which address planning for future sea level rise, capital improvement project needs especially those associated with drainage and shoreline protection, and land use decisions. APPLYING PROJECTION CURVES TO INFRASTRUCTURE SITING AND DESIGN When determining how to apply the projection curves, the user needs to consider the nature, value, interconnectedness, and life cycle of the existing or proposed infrastructure. The blue 11 shaded portion of the projection can be applied to most infrastructure projects, especially those with a design life expectancy of less than 50 years. The designer of a type of infrastructure that is easily replaced, has a short lifespan, is adaptable,and has limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services must weigh the potential benefit of designing for the upper blue line with the additional costs. Should the designer opt for specifying the lower curve, she/he must consider the consequences of under-designing for the potential likely sea level condition. Such consequences may include premature infrastructure failure. Additionally, planning for adaptation should be initiated in the conceptual phase. A determination must be made on whether or not threats can be addressed mid-life cycle via incremental adaptation measures, such as raising the height of a sluice gate on a drainage canal.. Forward thinking risk management is critical to avoiding loss of service, loss of asset value and most importantly loss of life or irrecoverable resources.An understanding of the risks that critical infrastructure will be exposed to throughout its life cycle such as sea level rise inundation, storm surge and nuisance flooding must be established early on in the conceptual phase. If incremental adaptation is not possible for the infrastructure proposed and inundation is likely, designing to accommodate the projected sea level rise at conception or selection of an alternate site should be considered. Projects in need of a greater factor of safety related to potential inundation should consider designing for the upper limit of the blue-shaded zone. Examples of such projects may include evacuation routes planned for reconstruction, communications and energy infrastructure and critical government and financial facilities. Due to the community's fundamental reliance on major infrastructure, existing and proposed critical infrastructure should be evaluated using the upper curve of the projection, the orange curve (Figure 1, NOAA High). Critical projects include those or projects which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years), or are interdependent with other infrastructure or services. If failure of the critical infrastructure would have catastrophic impacts, it is considered to be high risk. Due of the community's critical reliance on major infrastructure,existing and proposed high risk infrastructure should be evaluated using the upper curve of the projection, the orange curve (Figure 1, NOAA High). Examples of high risk critical infrastructure include nuclear power plants, wastewater treatment facilities, levees or impoundments, bridges along major evacuation routes, airports, seaports, railroads, and major highways. For low risk infrastructure projects, the lowermost curve of the projection (Figure 1, IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 curve) may be applied. Low risk projects include infrastructure expected to be constructed and then replaced within the next 10 years, projects that are easily replaceable and 12 adaptable or projects with limited interdependencies and limited impacts when failure occurs. An example of such a project may be a small culvert in an isolated area. Additionally, planning for adaptation should be initiated in the conceptual phase. A determination must be made on whether or not risk can be addressed mid-life cycle via incremental. If incremental adaptation is not possible for the type of high risk infrastructure proposed and inundation is likely, designing to accommodate the projected sea level rise at conception or selection of an alternate site should be considered. To ensure an appropriately conservative design approach is used, the upper limit of the projection (Figure 1, NOAA High) should be used for projects with design lives of more than 50 years. AVAILABLE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS ................................. The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and the individual Compact Counties have developed region-wide and county-wide sea level rise inundation vulnerability assessments available for public use (Compact, 2012). These assessments spatially delineate areas of inundation correlating to 1 foot, 2 feet and 3 feet of sea level rise. In addition, the Compact website hosts a multitude of sources of information, tools and links in support of adaptation and mitigation planning for use by the Compact communities. SUMMARY The Work Group recommends the use of the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve (USACE, 2015) and the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario (IPCC, 2013) as the basis for a Southeast Florida sea level rise projection for the 2030, 2060 and 2100 planning horizons. In the short term, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches by 2030 and 14 to 26 inches by 2060 (above the 1992 mean sea level). Sea level has risen 3 inches from 1992 to 2015. In the long term, sea level rise is projected to be 31 to 61 inches by 2100. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper curve is recommended with planning values of 34 inches in 2060 and 81 inches in 2100. Sea level will continue to rise even if global mitigation efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are successful at stabilizing or reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations; however, emissions mitigation is essential to moderate the severity of potential impacts in the future. A substantial increase in sea level rise within this century is likely and may occur in rapid pulses rather than gradually. The recommended projection provides guidance for the Compact Counties and their partners to initiate planning to address the potential impacts of sea level rise on the region.The shorter term planning horizons(through 2060)are critical to implementation of the Southeast Florida Regional 13 Climate Change Action Plan, to optimize the remaining economic life of existing infrastructure and to begin to consider adaptation strategies. As scientists develop a better understanding of the factors and reinforcing feedback mechanisms impacting sea level rise, the Southeast Florida community will need to adjust the projections accordingly and adapt to the changing conditions. To ensure public safety and economic viability in the long run, strategic policy decisions will be needed to develop guidelines to direct future public and private investments to areas less vulnerable to future sea level rise impacts. 14 LITERATURE CITED Bamber J. L., Aspinall, W. P. 2013. An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nat Clim Change 3: 424-427 Bell, R. E., Tinto, K., Das, I., Wolovick, M., Chu, W., Creyts, T. T., ... & Paden, J. D. 2014. Deformation,warming and softening of Greenland [rsquor] s ice by refreezing meltwater. Nature Geoscience. Bintanja, R.,Van Oldenborgh, G.J., Drijfhout,S. S.,Wouters, B., & Katsman, C.A. 2013. Important role for ocean warming and increased ice-shelf melt in Antarctic sea-ice expansion. Nature Geoscience, 6(5), 376-379. Blewitt, G., Kreemer, C., Hammond, W.C., Gazeaux, J. 2015. MIDAS trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection,Journal of Geophysical Research, in review. Bock, Y., Wdowinski, S., Ferretti, A., Novali, F., and Fumagalli, A. 2012. Recent subsidence of the Venice Lagoon from continuous GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13. Q03023. doi:10.1029/2011G0003976. Calafat, F.M. and Chambers, D.P. 2013. Quantifying recent acceleration in sea level unrelated to internal climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40. 3661-3666. doi:10.1002/gr1.50731. Church, J.A. and White, N.J. 2011. Sea-Level Rise from the Late 19th to the Early 21st Century. Surveys in Geophysics. 32(4-5). 585-602. doi:10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1. Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski,W.J.,Johns,T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M.,Tebaldi, C., Weaver,A.J. &Wehner, M. 2013. Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V. & Midgley P.M. (eds.), Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Ezer, T., Atkinson, L.P., Corlett, W.B., and Blanco, J.L. 2013. Gulf Stream's induced sea level rise and variability along the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 118. 685-697. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (Compact). 2012. Analysis of the Vulnerability of Southeast Florida to Sea Level Rise. 181 p. http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org//wp-content/uploads/2014/09/vulnerability- assessment.pdf 15 Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Technical Ad hoc Work Group (Compact). 2011. A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 27 p. Ezer,T. and Atkinson, L.P. 2014. Accelerated flooding along the U.S. East Coast: On the impact of sea-level rise, tides, storms, the Gulf Stream, and the North Atlantic Oscillations. Earth's Future. 2. 362-382. doi:10.1002/2014EF000252. Flick, R., Knuuti, K., and Gill, S. 2012. Matching mean sea level rise projections to local elevation datums.Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 139(2). 142-146. Gardner,A.S., Moholdt, G., Cogley,J.G., Wouters, B., Arendt,A.A.,Wahr,J., Berthier, E., Hock, R., Pfeffer, W.T., Kaser, G., Ligtenberg, S.R.M., Bolch, T., Sharp, M.J., Hagen, J.O., van den Broeke, M.R., and Paul, F. 2013. A Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009, Science. 340 (6134). 852-857. doi:10.1126/science.1234532. Greenbaum, J.S., Blankenship, D.D., Young, D.A., Richter, T.G., Roberts, J.L., Aitken, A.R.A., Legresy, B., Schroeder, D.M., Warner, R.C., van Ommen, T.D., and Siegert, M.J. 2015. Ocean access to a cavity beneath Totten Glacier in East Antarctica, Nature Geosci., publ.online 16 March doi:10.1038/NGEO2388, 2015. Hallberg, R., A. Adcroft, J. Dunne, J. Krasting, and R. J. Stouffer. 2013. Sensitivity of 21st century global-mean steric sea level rise to ocean model formulation. J. Clim. 26. 2947-2956. Hay, C. C., Morrow, E., Kopp, R. E., & Mitrovica, J. X. 2015. Probabilistic reanalysis of twentieth- century sea-level rise. Nature, 517(7535), 481-484. Hellmer, H. H., Kauker, F., Timmermann, R., Determann, J., & Rae, J. 2012. Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current. Nature, 485(7397), 225-228. Horton, B.P., Rahmstorf, S., Engelhart, S.E., Kemp,A.C., 2014. Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quaternary Science Reviews. 84. 1-6. IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013.The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group Ito the Fifth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York. Jacob, T., Wahr,J., Pfeffer, W.T., Swenson, S. 2012. Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature. 482. 514-518. Jacobs, S. S., Jenkins, A., Giulivi, C. F., & Dutrieux, P. 2011. Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf. Nature Geoscience,4(8), 519-523. 16 Jenkins, A., Dutrieux, P.,Jacobs, S. S., McPhail, S. D., Perrett,J. R., Webb, A.T., &White, D. 2010. Observations beneath Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica and implications for its retreat. Nature Geoscience, 3(7),468-472. Jevrejeva, S., Grinstead, A., and Moore, J.C., 2014. Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100. Environ. Res. Lett. 9 (2014) 104008 (9pp). Johnson, G. C., McTaggart, K. E., & Wanninkhof, R. 2014. Antarctic Bottom Water temperature changes in the western South Atlantic from 1989 to 2014. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(12), 8567-8577. Joughin, I., &Alley, R. B. 2011.Stability of the West Antarctic ice sheet in a warming world. Nature Geoscience,4(8), 506-513. King, M.A., Bingham, R.J., Moore, P.,Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M.J.,& Milne,G.A. 2012. Lower satellite-gravimetry estimates of Antarctic sea-level contribution. Nature, 491(7425), 586-589. Kirshen, P., Knee, K., and Ruth, M. 2008. Climate change and coastal flooding in Metro Boston: impacts and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change. 90(4). 453-473. d o i:10.1007/s 10584-008-9398-9. Kirtman, B.P., Bitz, C., Bryan, F., Collins, W., Dennis, J., Hearn, N., Kinterlll, J.L., Loft, R., Rousset, C., Siqueira, L., Stan, C., Tomas, R., Vertenstein, M. 2012. Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations. Climate Dynamics. 39(6). 1303-1328. d o i:10.1007/s00382-012-1500-3. Kleinosky, L.R.,Yarnal, B., and Fisher, A. 2007.Vulnerability of Hampton Roads,Virginia to storm- surge flooding and sea-level rise. Natural Hazards. 40(1). 43-70. d o i:10.1007/s 11069-006-0004-z. Kopp, R.E., Horton, R.M., Little, C.M., Mitrovica,J.X., Oppenheimer, M., Rasmussen, D.J., Strauss, B.H., and Tebaldi, C. 2014. Probabilistic 21st and 22nd century sea-level projections at a global network of tide-gauge sites. Earth's Future. 2(8). 383-406. doi:10.1002/2014EF000239. Morlighem, M., Rignot, E., Mouginot,J.,Seroussi, H., & Larour, E. 2014. Deeply incised submarine glacial valleys beneath the Greenland ice sheet. Nature Geoscience, 7(6), 418-422. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Warming seas and melting ice sheets." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 26 August 2015. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/08/150826111112.htm Nevada Geodetic Laboratory. 2015. "CHIN Station Data" http://geodesy.unr.edu/NGLStationPages/stations/CHIN.sta 17 NOAA, 2015. "Mean Sea Level Trend, 8724580 Key West, Florida." http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends station.shtml?stnid=8724580 NOAA, 2014. Sea Level Rise and Nuisance Flood Frequency Changes around the United States. Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 073. Sweet W. V., Park J., Marra J., Zervas C., Gill S. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/NOAA_Technical_Report_NOS_COOPS_073.pdf Obeysekera, J. and Park, J. 2013. Scenario-based projection of extreme sea levels. Journal of Coastal Research. Vol. 29, Issue 1, 1-7. Overduin, P., Grigoriev, M.N., Schirrmeister, L., Wetterich, S., Natscher, V., Gunther, F., Liebner, S., Knoblauch, C. and Hubberten, H. W. 2014. Permafrost degradation and methane release in the central Laptev Sea. 4th European Conference on Permafrost, Evora. 18 June 2014 - 21 June 2014. Park,J. and Sweet, W. 2015. Accelerated sea level rise and Florida Current transport. Ocean Sci., 11, 607-615, doi:10.5194/os-11-607-2015. Parris, A., Bromirski, P., Burkett,V., Cayan, D., Culver, M., Hall,J., Horton, R., Knuuti, K., Moss, R., Obeysekera, J., Sallenger, A., and Weiss, J. 2012. Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the US National Climate Assessment. NOAA Tech Memo OAR CPO-1. Pritchard, H. D., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Fricker, H. A., Vaughan, D. G., Van den Broeke, M. R., & Padman, L. 2012. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature, 484(7395), 502-505. Rahmstorf, S., Feulner, G., Mann, M. E., Robinson, A., Rutherford, S., & Schaffernicht, E. J. 2015. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nature Climate Change. Rampal, P.,Weiss,J., Dubois, C., &Campin,J. M. 2011. IPCC climate models do not capture Arctic sea ice drift acceleration: Consequences in terms of projected sea ice thinning and decline. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 116(C8). Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., van den Broeke, M.R., Monaghan, A., and Lenaerts,J. 2011. Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophysical Research Letters. 38. L05503. doi:10.1029/2011GL046583. Rye, C. D., Garabato, A. C. N., Holland, P. R., Meredith, M. P., Nurser, A. G., Hughes, C. W., ... & Webb, D.J. 2014. Rapid sea-level rise along the Antarctic margins in response to increased glacial discharge. Nature Geoscience, 7(10), 732-735. 18 Salas, J. and Obeysekera, J. 2014. Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events.J. Hydrol. Eng., 19(3), 554-568. Sallenger, A.H., Doran, K.S., and Howd, P.A. 2012. Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America. Nature Clim.Change.2(12).884-888.doi:10.1038/nclimate1597. Santamaria-Gomez, A., Gravelle, M., Collilieux, X., Guichard, M., Miguez, B.M., Tiphaneau, P., Woppelmann, G. 2012. Mitigating the effects of vertical land motion in tide gauge records using a state-of-the-art GPS velocity field, Global and Planetary Change. 98-99. 6-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.07.007. Schuur, E.A.G., Abbott, B.W., Bowden, W.B., Brovkin, V., Camill, P., Canadell, J.G., Chanton, J.P., Chapin, F.S., Ill, Christensen, T.R., Ciais, P., Crosby, B.T., Czimczik, C.I., Grosse, G., Harden, J., Hayes, D.J., Hugelius, G., Jastrow, J.D.,Jones, J.B., Kleinen, T., Koven, C.D., Krinner, G., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D.M., McGuire, A.D., Natali, S.M., O'Donnell, J.A., Ping, C.L., Riley, W.J., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V.E., Sannel, A.B.K., Schadel, C., Schaefer, K., Sky, J., Subin, Z.M., Tarnocai, C., Turetsky, M.R., Waldrop, M.P., Walter Anthony, K.M., Wickland, K.P., Wilson, C.J., Zimov, S.A., 2013. Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change. Climatic Change. 119. 2. 359-374. Smeed, D.A., McCarthy, G.D., Cunningham, S.A., Frajka-Williams, E., Rayner, D., Johns, W.E., Meinen, C.S., Baringer, M.O., Moat, B.I., Duchez, A., and Bryden, H.L. 2014. Observed decline of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation 2004-2012. Ocean Sci. 10. 29-38. doi:10.5194/os- 10-29-2014. Snay, R., Cline, M., Dillinger,W., Foote, R., Hilla,S., Kass,W., Ray,J., Rohde,J., Sella,G., and Soler, T. 2007. Using global positioning system-derived crustal velocities to estimate rates of absolute sea level change from North America tide gauge records. J. Geophys. Res. 112. B04409. d o i:10.1029/2006)B004606. Spence, P., Griffies, S.M., England, M.H., Hogg, A.M., Saenko, O.A., Jourdain, N.C. 2014. Rapid subsurface warming and circulation changes of Antarctic coastal waters by poleward shifting winds. Geophysical Research Letters.41. 4601-4610. doi:10.1002/2014GL060613. Sweet,W.V. and Park,J. 2014. From the extreme to the mean: Acceleration and tipping points of coastal inundation from sea level rise. Earth's Future, 2: 579-600. doi:10.1002/2014EF000272. Talpe, M., Nerem, R.S., and Lemoine, F. 2014. G21C-02 Two decades of ice melt reconstruction in Greenland and Antarctica from time-variable gravity.Amer.Geophysical Union,Abstract G21C- 02, Ann. Natl. Mtg. Tebaldi, C., Strauss, B.H., Zervas, C. E. 2012. Modelling sea level rise impacts on storm surges along US coasts. Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (2012) 11 pp. 19 USACE. 2015. USACE Sea Level Change Curve Calculator (2015.46) http://www.corpsclimate.us/ccaceslcurves.cfm USACE. 2013. Incorporating sea level change in civil works programs. Department of the Army Regulation No. 1100-2-8162, 31 December 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CE, Washington D.C. USACE. 2011.Sea-Level Change Considerations in Civil Works Programs. Department of the Army Engineering Circular No. 1165-2-212, 1 October 2011. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CE, Washington, D.C. Velicogna, I., T. C. Sutterley, and M. R. van den Broeke. 2014. Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica using GRACE time-variable gravity data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 41. 8130-8137. d o i:10.1002/20146 L06105 2. Vinther, B. M., Buchardt, S. L., Clausen, H. B., Dahl-Jensen, D., Johnsen, S. J., Fisher, D. A., ... & Svensson,A. M. 2009. Holocene thinning of the Greenland ice sheet. Nature,461(7262), 385-388. Watson, C.S., White, N.J., Church,J.A., King, M.A., Burgette, R.J. & Legresy, B. 2015. Unabated global mean sea-level rise over the satellite altimeter era. Natrure Climate Change, 5, 565-568. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/iournal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2635.html Wdowinski, S., Bray, R., Kirtman, B., and Wu, Z. 2015. Increasing flooding frequency and accelerating rates of sea level rise in Miami Beach, Florida. Submitted, Envir. Res. Let. Yin,J., Schlesinger, M.E., and Stouffer, R.J. 2009. Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States. Nature Geosci. 2(4). 262-266. doi:10.1038/ngeo462. http://www.nature.com/ngeo/iournal/v2/n4/suppinfo/ngeo462 S1.html. 20 S*01441AST FLORID \\ "4°�.:" ,,b,,�,� rE' T'�r�w°r��¢F��!HE', Y z iy f A a n , r k!Y�r./.n9iAri �\� �a rr T \ • yy 14, C E BR:6 Y YElk A IriA RE) 4if . MIAMI-DA C �„a� a '' 11111 OUNT FLORIDA Atoottql; APPENDIX A: STAND ALONE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT AND PROJECTION The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection is presented below showing the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 1).The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1) Short term, by 2030, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level; 2) Medium term, by 2060, sea level rise is projected to be 14 to 26 inches above 1992 mean sea level with the less likely possibility of extending to 34 inches; 3) Long term, by 2100, sea level rise is projected to be 31 to 61 inches above 1992 mean sea level with the less likely possibility of extending to 81 inches. The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida include three curves, named after the global sea level rise curves from which they were derived: the NOAA High Curve (orange solid), the USACE High Curve (blue solid) and the median of the IPCC AR5 scenario (blue dashed). The blue shaded area represents the likely range of sea level rise for our region. The orange curve represents a condition that is possible but less likely. The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference (green dashed curve). This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect the impact on sea level from the current emissions trends. When determining how to apply the projection curves, the user needs to consider the nature, value,interconnectedness,and life cycle of the infrastructure in question.The following guidance is provided for using the projection. 21 • The shaded zone between the IPCC AR5 median curve and the USACE High is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short to long-term planning horizon, especially those with a design life expectancy of less than 50 years. The designer of a type of infrastructure that is easily replaced, has a short lifespan, is adaptable, and has limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services must weigh the potential benefit of designing for the upper blue line with the additional costs. Should the designer opt for specifying the lower curve, he must consider the consequences of under designing for the potential likely condition. • The uppermost boundary of the projection (orange curve) should be utilized for planning of critical infrastructure to be constructed after 2060 or projects with a long design life (more than 50 years) as a conservative estimate of potential sea level rise. Critical projects include those which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years), or are interdependent with other infrastructure or services. If failure of the infrastructure would have catastrophic impacts on the economy, community or environment, it should be considered critical. To reference the projection to the current year i.e. 2015, simply subtract the values listed in the table below from the projected sea level rise. For example, based on the projection, sea level rise in 2030 will be 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level. In order to determine how much rise will occur relative to the current year, 2015, the values listed in the table below for the IPCC AR5 median and USACE High curves can be subtracted from the projected range i.e. 6-3=3 inches for the lower end of the range and 10-4.3=5.6 inches for the upper end of the range, respectively. The projection can be restated as such: sea level will rise 3 to 5.6 inches from this year (2015) to 2030. IPCC ARS Median USACE High NOAA High Current Year (Blue Dashed Line) (Blue Solid Line) (Orange Line) :2 yw, exzr nsY',_. a,nrr.. ,'i I��x ry, Nr! cu• ..,..w ,r'. p:y%,:!;+.'yi: �•;/,W�,.yld ry: '"rar/:yry?4�d :l,:.11'<.,,n%yi.,:,.. v ::•rn; i',. !tc v9p •':f -,..,,;,r�.. ..'".,J, :,.. ,. :r /H A}7d""'�" d;( !;1.,i,�'.'r'�#.':'"% c..f✓; �" r r,4 d.�'.,.f,.y'r ,/?;q y ,�'.., �4..:.�'y, ..�.t�,. �:�r;. ,.,,.%..,,�h� � 'NN.•7J' ,r� i! .��:�[. .:•r 'A tJ. ,y�..: �f Y. ,•m��!�,r 7`!%�'"y9 Y„?S.; z'�b,,..Rr./n $,.;,:,r 4' 4:/, +5,:.c,.,�/,, rr,, n' �;;/ �.;c ,.r !r :.: �y n k' 3/ r 4✓,{ ;;y W,',„ 4���f�. ,:,,y/.,,M (-441 ,yJ v! a Vii,.. Y s.(r., gy..f..�' � �:,�.�C�r/� ,/:,..!iy,,:?� ,yt ,,,.h ! ,,,y. f!,:; .N,. , ::�•bJ,. � d /:�r,, '(/''�y ✓ :,:'� 9 �t!.K;�'�nd�r,.:,..;:r G,��M r� ...W9.y.<. ! ,i+.�.��,t.:,,: /!.r '•; �', y 44� �,..! / •'! �� ��o :�,'b.:. r .9'y/: ^r�F ,�,.r ;�Y/ /:,' �i” ..,,nw. y� �, y.. r:: /'Via'[,'..'L✓. :d .,/ � '"'4k / :.;C r;.,:s�;•r e' 'iHi.,:�� ',',.q.QQ ;X ,//. ! n`;,, y::'„�. ✓/9.•r,,,::r .R'.,.... F,.:r'Y.,.,..:,” 3'.,.,;,, .:,,//...:./I! '-f % ." r G !; ,t .! •N Yr r..J: An.y 9!, .,...:: o,,.i�,:. Y:�':,.:,..rya6>.•l/+W'4 �,.,K� .:N',ey ��....,..,., .,.� r/d '-6 � /" ol",' ., ,., d •.h::.!ri +��",, .!...,.,.. ..Y:.� /:,��4,,:.:S�n,.n � '�, r�� r.� ��,�/.N:r'; rtG!' .,/: �;/rife,,-)v„ :nr ,�,/'.:w;f!%. Ak.,,.:: � ,:,:::.n. .:(., ,i✓ � ...Jr�..%ir .. :'Q8. '•ro'r r'.,�i., :y,� r' n! 2015 .,� � k.q�` .u.,..! .... �:....,.,. ,r.r, .l.�. ,..,,J r<..,�y��!�'' ,..� ';'/ r:::.,2rr/,��,,!�,{ ,.,'.: ,:�:.;4�r ,:(,Nr;;.�. ..!� n ray ,G a:,::,�/L ,.rr!,t".�nn/.,�Y:7 / ;�;,, ,..... r�',.:;7.�.,..:,. /r/ ,n ,,",�/�V: .0:..r.: r `-"� 'w �r N'�,�.�ri +,��.•� ,4��..!,.�k,,a.0 ���:a�ybur.J: ���.,�,.''�.r!r•!x:�dX�,,:y�� /,!!!bM.riyb!a'a,/,v As,a•�;:u'h/�o.Y.�i,.d'GS:.:rt, �' .. r._�/i.�av„4r�d„ld,r/�,�•x,�,k. 2016 3.1 4.7 5.6 r :.! :!p .r”.q:�yr--• ;•:nr •ri„"ry •r, r•r, r: ;:..y ''hnyiR.;a<.:`//:�./!!.-.:n/,t�..,_..:.:�'/:,.N:,.:;,�,,4::+,i.�,..:/.;ryY.rr./di�i r y;r�N,'.r#„t�9H.r:a..,a,...o,i�,un,/rr•/.R/.;,r::,,..r:.(',fik✓:�d"::»,:!��.;:r'/S.:,ta,a.;"r�,,,,.:.,'r,,�`1/,(!rn,a�,”.+3d�":n:j 3,'>.�5,N.�.,S�/.rfi.,;,JY.:.,.,.:I„.,;?r:,Yh.r,:'.';✓,,...;P:,:/r Y.g,�/,ry,/'/y/�.r�I�A,/m�,G':'.r/.r�d1 r/�''r'.r,�(<Gu�„,a).�,'j.:t'.,.r�:,..y./,'�.n,�...R,,./;y.,:�:...,f'/:!yr.!,',...,!.y;,,.5.'A,!,!./ir.1�,.•.,r.Y.�d„�.,!;.d....”;,y•'”�r6,tl+f<•,'•.i:.y...::':'/....•,,/.•1.0/4f4:,Yr,,y.i!i'.l"t�Yn+ry.�.!•r�m/.•!.�:•�✓.•r/:.5!�Sr:-„:,..�..f.fY.J.r:,�(.ry/{.�i''„'yyS,:../A'6Y c/,,YA{,,in(.:�bN",,./',f.�rk„li,d,h.�,:�r..,�,.,,r,./,,.:�;;,y,i,:,r,/�::..,,:�.ys:.;:ql.n�i;,..,r4.^:•::;'.'�,:;.a:.�..:,:&.irr„r�'N”,y„/:w�r:..,,.-a:,,I�.tY:n,�d�/l;:,�',x,'/�.,..,:%.:Z,�!Z„4../�i/r;.,:.:.'::%.:..,:•;ig,:,r../•,4:9r;(,.,g.,�,k!4.Yr.>.r�?.i,�,,."r'{nr/:iY.nk'r''.,.�ni,:yGrri,.�r„..§�"..Jy.,..,,.,r,�,2�,.r.+.-.":,�.:;'.N:�,Y_j.'�..Y:,,,r..mrB.,!r';n.r.:�r./n.t,G"rr.:,:.„„,!,/y�r.�,�f/Hd.,i./:HI.:.,,,:,,:y'!qr!,i,,'m/.N�:./:,bx/:r.,.Yv.,//r�/h,µ�nn..�..::.7,d,.�^*Gd,,^:/.„b..9G:-:.,�5,%v(I;':!�',.,n:qr;,.d�.a::„r•!.:r�.,k,;..�/v:y��/,r„,,.Srr,,(,.�r//rf,,r�•..y,.r.C.�!w ri,;!I.,�,<,,G.�:/,,r•.',r!,•:.r'rA:,'�...:g/.��:+�+!+;S.�:.,�f!/�,x.r+.ir,/6;:.H;.4,r F',;n.r••,:,,!�/!."�,i.:;,:.!..�,'.{Vr/.”,.':.;rS,.YH.4� ,,,”:•144 / � q,f /, wrH 2Q17 2018 3.5 5.3 6.4 ...Y/3r(,..::�;':.,''�.',.'.w4�lir�,cv6i!W�+iX,.'?/t4,>',h!ra{r';;F%c'.9'�n!t,!r'',I.,✓:11�;r r.,,'.i�,r .•,.o .,„�a".."i.!7s�r 4 s!:..f:�<�d,;,'..'�.::'�.,.r,'v;..-rw,.:7u!..,•1•y:i,�...:,,a;i/...g';�;;/R,rY(:;�..:u%d,y''�'n,9�.:'.'.,�'r,d.r,..�•,',:.'"�rr/r��.”!r•n,'.r•,,•,v,f,4.r�....x'/Y./'//�>j,y"p'�y�rHt..'��n.ya•.>y.i.•,,�"` } .,••%".r..,q n.5y,��y'�•.n;.'fr�..',•,Y.,ViuIs0 d!/,;r•r,n/4!r ..s,••9.h..,r.�'Y w�%,' �«d,�n��si,1nJ,„l�„r,r,:rN.:b!'.{•r.;",,(f,R�:,9qr:r.J�•v�!?A:,..•:,rr.�x:,�rin'f,,,Y.� Ybr.,r./.,�r,,4.iK;,a.v;�•.;A,•''y,)?rif•t`'s`;�i"W.,•,:4 r'ms.4 !'//4111;11 / �� 2)131,1; 7:314 r;�� {! '//1/ /;;;;'4 i;;� 4:;;;' 9Nit �6) 2019 :'11:111A;;r � qQ�•r.�,..,..,�,,a;;,+.:::;Y,1My: To convert local relative sea level rise datum from mean sea level to a topographic reference point used in surveying land elevations (NAVD 88), add the number listed in the table below to projected sea level rise: 22 To convert relative sea To convert relative sea Mean High Mean Low level rise datum from level rise datum from Water Water mean sea level to feet mean sea level to inches (MHW) (MLW) NAVD 88*,add the number NAVD 88,add the number below to value from below to value from projection projection ..., ,..:,.. ;;, :;:: •,:::v rr :,:::r r ,.,,r „.,: ,r a:,,,x, r'.t '.N+:.a•v.V �?:,;:;v ad!r •.m. :Rtil 4m>�. .,M><Gyjt>ry",:blG�'A�'Y;, > ';� (''!�,,'!H^"�," .,pr. �a •:i'": .,.. :; ,,.,. � ,:�w :,,._. x.,,,:. .,.,, !'",..:.,,mr, •.`,...�. n,o.,. ,n,;r... „�:,% '�7..+...: .:,,, ,< ,.•::n^ar ,:.;i„_, r :G�4u„ ..:�.�'ag, 2�, ;,....„^...,... ..,.., .. ,.,. .. ,_•,,,,f„o ..,:. .... .::.,,.:M ,t,•rl.:.,• ,�+.?'.,., ,.^;:,.v,t>•,.::.., ,,.,;ern,,<,�vt., ,.�y�' "� � ,.r�: � � ,:.'Y'rls4",;.. ..,r ,,�. ,2 ..,. >qr ..:.Raw.,h v ,;,,, x,..;,., y .y...,c.. ti r..x.;,s W y,✓�r �•.. x �^ ./, .y'N ,•r. � .. ,d3�rr r:;, >s Q-S, r Y �,✓.:.:5� :5 r � �, �' ,s7 :r ,y�. ."1, 6 xn. �"/a�;Y/Y r �y,l l:t�b #,:� : ,.,^rr., ,...,.� ,�.., ,•4 ,i : ,.'•: !...., I! !:;:�.� ,...;y .. ':y,3 ....A.Y h n'�S •;.ny Yt,:�..s,.t a'.%% ;:ii i�;�,:,.-ad.�v .....,:; .y,,,.;.� 2„ '��.,.. ..� :�Y .:: :;i cs4.. �:... r ;:;�' ..x.,::M Y r.,, '.r. ti�.,.;P,.w IR;J ,y^i•:r.;, '5,..,.,,�. Jk;r,, ,.,.i "n i,^'• X:....«,mw+xaa..:•...�":: .. ,::t. ,: r ^r...) ::... ,.t,.. ::::„n ;v a,i, , .:„„�' .:.,., .... :... .:,:, .... ,'�o�..... ::n,� w•+.r :,�`G,'1 7,n�t�.`fir Rr.uµnt `�f'•+'f�'/ ::,.,............ . ...::. ....,,,,., .,.. .,. , :.... !: ,,,..., ,x,,.,, ...., , wr•xwx.•,.+a.:...., ..., r "'” ,, :...': t^�Q` :'�!n'.....v'�J\:v oMa.r A+ v. :...y.,..).........................:...h....+ r,.. Jr,rx:;r. ,n,. ,.'r 1,,,:$(i•.4n r,^f44k..4M VW:.9h4d r.#..,w�;w..” •.vA`7 m�I�>�•"n 1n:v,/ w, ,,it",�,•w..” Ni '' r , ....w�.w,!.r�„x...«�..c, ,G,„.�+�,r,...^w�.r•.,w:.,•, c•w.•..�.,,,.w a y4:w r�` ±.::M ...,, ,� 'Y..... r,,,•., .:. •,r,,:,. ..,.,•;�.7"t'c ,'�I:, +"�,..qf o 2,,5'''�' o' �m y r, . ,�,.,,':, r,,::,;: ,v,:..✓,, .., ,:•!.r ::.� ;,, .,.,J ;.: :... F,,,�, .:: yp.�,JX:,, r::' �. 1:3J t Jr R x. ,nS.��rti,�N,ryeanwnV,4n.",R„wa!Ha'tm;.:m r.Jr.r�v„.m�,,., .. +K v,v/,f' r Yl,x�x M.,,,ar,ro,''m',5.� .�•[rfM,u:s'1/�!.�f,.:�[p',�'& ''i1^n .,.•:�, ..,. v t.�;`, :"_nrv,.+ ,�„7nfi!mv�ivx m,ds.�.`t:r„ ,�(4 ti,". ,r., R .,�1�,.F'",h�,Y;!rdnM'����v�yf+,r'Ye'(rr�1'KvYJ,•4b9 x,�/S'•tAv t... A inS2311 -0.87 -10.4 -5.6 -14.2 ... _..,.. ....... ... ,,... ::,:,.^ �,,. .. •, x:::.: y,.,:,, ,,.:.�x,„•..s s:;,: r::.:`x ,'m'-r%^y.,.;w%: ar motif, 7r+",,,:y:rr nt s+yr.;;v f J x'$ :k 9�'f/!�dpi'':'` '�':;r# ,_, 'o-:•<e. ,n ao;;ry em.u':::o: -.,:,, n ,::::e ,,:::.,, .:r:.;; 7 J:�,r+.:: ,, .,,:::, S ,,:,.... ,,.,�. �t ,�i .x4; •:'r f/ �{S:>�': i 3 r;i.. � $: } ✓ y7 r Y+ qs fin' �y. r J r •;�. :�)•� t r t x J'',: o t s;{)• >)%r 4 s:;:4 �. :' '° s : ,.::. .. •✓ r. si:r n< r nn':;.•r..6 nrr6,vw,,r.. .,,:, ,n .., X x T '� xn»n:^+ n yx ,, ,..x �'P"«':T'":'� '"y4,y.�N� r n. `•�A a:' % w,'+ryNir>.�M!w,.n:;;x Vaca KeY r,�"W'dv't'M�,kHB,•w«^•,F^w,�k`.a,«wx++.v , , .a^,tlw^Y`W.,4w:M^yvM4 ,�� `�m?c"^^s`y+rc«kx"r Y �,,'S ^�;"'�+,5§%';ry°r.„%„'^`�"S', v, ^, , x,yww,.»Mvr1C"'4!L�'?d�y+�+,"`�vr m9,,,5�s�'i" SE Miami -0.96 -11.5 3.0 -26.5 Beach !^ h r Lake Wo rth ro '7,:..•»w....:.h,..a.x�u..;r,:,�, -046— �.:....,,.�,,6..•-�.•�...,:.,.�n»»............v..,.;.�+'v,..,.,..:::,;.,..r ,.•:.:,..:.1 f ,, rn,4w,.,.,:..;,.•« 7.,..#R:•:wa t Q. ':•.�"�;LT' :M^v'Mst.rr"s n^-�).,:••!s+;i°•.'S>,��,���/'r/>i':';nw'4^':w4Sy77:777i,177 7is4yt' n. w wv+4r �yylinJ err o 2 ^s r t`•a � ycr�n ,�:r h�' .r� s"S f �� i e J y •A%,.,,.,i' ,'T s it s.S, rr 'r Y - : ,'„ .v„:' r din,�wr.s,:,, 4'ix 'N�:�^k' 4x,y,'•. r 'I: k�,&. ,��v .;, '� nr N v r]r,r,ar 2n,�•':4�eS .,..:�r'�2 x updw#�''H,�S.•.l'',x' n.....:vr..r.._u��,,.,..b.at,a(fA.�XA'x,.•7,Mh.rw:�rn>8��..N ..,,r:,, `J *North American Vertical Datum of 1988(NAVD 88)is the topographic reference point used in surveying land elevations. By definition it is the vertical control datum of orthometric height established for vertical control surveying in the United States of America based upon the General Adjustment of the North American Datum of 1988. Alternatively, the USACE Sea Level Change Curve Calculator (Version 2018.88) (USACE, 2015) found at this website http://www.corpsclimate.us/ccaceslcurves.cfm can be used to change datums, reference years and tide gauge locations. The projection curves were generated using this tool. The equations used for the curves comprising the unified sea level rise projection are as follows: ❖ NOAA High Curve (Parris, 2012) and USACE High Curve (USACE, 2013): E(t2)—E(ti)=.a(t2—ti) +b(t22—t12) where E(t2) — E(ti) = Eustatic sea level change (m) with reference year of 1992; ti = difference in time between current year or construction date and 1992 e.g. 2015-1992 = 23 years; t2=difference in time between future date of interest and 1992 i.e. 2060-1992 = 68 years; where a is a constant equal to 0.0017 mm/yr, representing the rate of global mean sea level change, 23 and b is a variabe equal to 1.56x10-4 for the NOAA High Curve; 1.13x104 for the USACE high curve, representing the acceleration of sea level change. •:• IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 Median Curve (IPCC, 2013): E(t2)—E(ti)=0.00/7(t2—t1) +(4.684499x10-5)(r12—t12) ❖ The NOAA Intermediate Low/ USACE Low curve that is not part of the projection but included on the graph for reference (green dashed line) can be derived as follows: E(t2)—E(ti)=0.00/7(t2—ti) +(2.71262x105)(t22—t12) The equations above are global mean sea level rise projections. In order to adapt the curves for regional use, the average rate of mean sea level rise or "a" value is adjusted. For example, to reference the above equations to the Key West tide gauge, a equals 0.0022 mm/yr. 24 80 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) Li- IPCC AR5 = USACE High NOAA High Year median ri) bo (inches) (inches) inches. -- ›. a) ci c 50 ; m 2030 6 10 12 Fc- ,0 40 2060 14 26 34 C.) � 2100 31 61 81 7 30 26" 10 ..+ " e s,AC E Intermediate/NOAA Intermediate Low 4 -. �P W 1992 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 20% 2100 Year Figure A-1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC AR5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve), the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100. The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. 25 APPENDIX B: STATE OF SCIENCE UPDATE. ACCELERATION OF SEA LEVEL RISE A statistically significant acceleration of sea level rise has been documented in the latter half of the 20th century continuing through recent years (Church and White, 2011; Calafat and Chambers, 2013; Hay et al. 2015; IPCC, 2013;Watson et al., 2015). Hay et al. (2015) reported the global sea level rise rate from 1901 to 1990 to be 1.2 +/- 0.2 mm/yr (a value which had been overestimated in previous studies). Since 1993, an increase in the average global mean sea level rise rate has been observed (Hay et al., 2015; Watson et al., 2015). Watson et al. (2015) has most recently reported the average global mean sea level rise rate to be more than double the rate of the previous century, indicating an acceleration;the observed rate was 2.6+0.4 mm/yr from 1993 to 2015 with an acceleration of 0.04 mm/yr2. This acceleration indicates sea level will rise more rapidly in the future than it has historically. The global and regional processes driving sea level rise and its acceleration are discussed in the following sections. FACTORS INFLUENCING SEA LEVEL RISE GLOBAL PROCESSES In 2011, the Work Group noted studies describing a variety of reinforcing (positive) feedbacks that are accelerating ice sheet melt in Greenland and Antarctica and also accelerating Arctic pack ice melt, permafrost thaw and organic decay, and methane hydrate release from the warming Siberian Shelf, in addition to other global processes affecting sea level rise i.e. increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changes in volcanic forcing and tropospheric aerosol loading (Compact, 2011). Since then, numerous additional reinforcing feedbacks have been documented and previously recognized feedbacks have intensified. ACCELERATION OF ICE MELT Accelerated melting of the ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica (Rignot et al., 2011; Talpe et al., 2014) is expected to be the predominant factor affecting sea level rise acceleration during the 21st Century. Melting is caused by increasing temperatures and warming of the atmosphere, warm currents moving along the coast of Greenland, and warm ocean water moving under and up into ice sheets through deep outlet glacial fjords in Antarctica. Recent observations have indicated ice sheets are more vulnerable to melting than previously realized due to the extent of deep valleys within the ice sheets connecting warmer ocean water to the internal areas of the ice sheets thus causing rapid melting and peripheral thinning (Jenkins et al., 2010; Jacobs et al., 2011; Morlighem et al., 2014; Rignot et al., 2014; Greenbaum et al., 2015). Accelerated melting results in large discharges of fresh water which raises the local sea level near the ice sheets (8 26 inches around Antarctica over past 20 years) (Rye et al., 2014). This release of freshwater has resulted in a seasonal increase in the amount of sea ice in the Antarctic(Bintanja et al., 2013; Rye et al., 2014) and slower circulation of North Atlantic surface water, also known as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Rahmstorf et al., 2015). The slowdown in circulation may contribute to increased local sea level rise along the Florida coast, as discussed in the Regional/ Local Processes section. The IPCC projections do not include the factors related to acceleration of ice melting processes described above, and as a result are likely an underestimate of future sea level rise (Rignot et al., 2011). ICE SHEET DISINTEGRATION Indicators of ice sheet disintegration include retreat of the ice sheet's outer boundary and rapid thinning. Lateral flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet margin, the outer boundary, has dramatically accelerated in the past two decades in response to surface melt waters penetrating fractures in the ice and warming and softening the ice (Bell et al., 2014). In addition to retreat, the ice sheets have initiated a rapid thinning process due to basal melt (Pritchard et al., 2012), signaling the initiation of prolonged ice sheet degradation based on historic analysis (Johnson et al., 2014). Joughin et al. (2011) have used numerical models to look at the sensitivity of the outlet glaciers of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to ocean water melt and have concluded that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse is already underway; the extent of the collapse in the future is not yet known. As part of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite monitoring program, ice sheet mass loss has been quantified as 280±58 gigatons per year(Gt/yr) from Greenland and up to 180±10 Gt/yr in Antarctica (Velicogna et al., 2014). As a reference for the magnitude of a gigaton, one could estimate one gigaton to equal the mass of over one hundred million elephants. In addition, significant recent work was completed to verify the estimated contribution of ice sheet disintegration to sea level rise using satellite data (Jacob et al., 2012; King et al., 2012; Gardner et al., 2013) with the conclusion that ice sheet melt accounted for 29±13% of sea level rise from 2003 to 2009 (Gardner, 2013). In order to further refine the estimates and projections of the magnitude of ice sheet degradation and their contribution to sea level rise, the complex dynamics driving ice sheet melt need to be better understood, in particular the mechanisms driving interactions between ice sheets and warm currents. WARM CURRENTS In 2011, the Work Group acknowledged the effects of warm ocean water currents accelerating summer pack ice melt and causing melting beneath the outlet glaciers. Recent work has further clarified the compounding mechanisms driving the flow and temperature changes of warm currents. Spence et al. (2014) analyzed the poleward shift in direction of the southern hemisphere westerly winds since the 1950's and simulated the intense warming of coastal waters 27 associated with such a shift in order to explain and forecast the significant temperature increase in ocean waters interacting with the base of ice sheets and floating ice shelves.This study serves to validate the projection of the persistence of this wind trend and the resulting melting due to warm current interaction. Separate from wind forcing, an increase in ocean surface stress due to thinning of the formerly consolidated sea-ice cover near Antarctica is proposed to result in a redirection of warm ocean currents into submarine glacial troughs and further expediting melting of the deep ice-shelf base based on ocean-ice modeling (Hellmer et al., 2012). Ice sheet melt as a result of interaction with warm currents is one of the dominant factors contributing to recent global sea level rise (IPCC, 2013); however, as discussed in the next section, land based contributions to global warming may further exacerbate sea level rise in the future. THAWING PERMAFROST The potential for significant additional emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from thawing permafrost and the rate of occurrence continues to be investigated. The intricate feedback mechanisms associated with permafrost are not well understood; as such, the IPCC did not include permafrost thaw in its projections (Collins et al., 2013). This deficiency was criticized publicly due to the theorized potential for permafrost carbon emissions to exceed emissions from fossil fuel use. Schuur et al. 2013 conducted a survey of experts to quantify permafrost change in response to four global warming scenarios and found despite risk for significant contributions of emissions from thawing, fossil fuel combustion was likely to remain the main source of emissions and climate forcing until 2100 based on the proposed warming scenarios. Following the release of the IPCC(2013) report,demand for research to understand the dynamics of the physical and chemical permafrost processes has increased in order to confirm the estimates of emissions from thawing. As an initial step, the occurrence of significant submarine permafrost thawing was confirmed by Overduin et al. (2014) when 8 to 10°C of warming within the permafrost layer was observed in less than 1,000 years, resulting in a degradation of ice- bearing permafrost at the rate of 3 cm/yr. In addition, seawater seeping through soil pores was identified as the source of sulfate necessary to oxidize methane in the upper layer of the thawing permafrost.Although site specific, studies such as Overduin et al. (2014)will begin to provide the information necessary to incorporate permafrost thawing into models and projections in the near future. REGIONAL/ LOCAL PROCESSES VERTICAL LAND MOVEMENT Vertical earth movements, which regionally and locally modify the globally averaged rate of sea level change, result in a relative rate of change that varies from one location to another. These 28 land motions have been inferred from historical tide data and geodesic measurements. When added to projected rates of global mean sea level rise, they result in a perceived change ranging from increased rise in regions of subsidence (e.g., New Orleans) to falling sea levels where the land is being uplifted (e.g., along the northern border of the Gulf of Alaska). Other regions are geologically stable and have only small differences with respect to the global rate of change. In South Florida, in general, coastal land elevations are considered to be relatively stable meaning that the land is not experiencing significant uplift nor subsidence. It is also important to note,the vertical land movement that is occurring is non-uniform across South Florida and movement measured at specific monitoring stations sites may not reflect vertical land movement in adjacent areas. The Continuously Operating Reference (COR) network of permanent Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers provides precise measurements of vertical land movement in four locations throughout Southeast Florida (Key West, Virginia Key, Pompano Beach, and Palm Beach) over periods of nine to eleven years.Additional continuous GPS measurements have been acquired in eight other sites in the region over various time periods(two to eleven years). Precise analysis of these data reveals negligible vertical movements at most stations (less than 1 mm/yr) (Snay et al., 2007;Santamaria-Gomez et al.,2012; NGL,2015). However,some stations show 1 to 6 mm/yr of subsidence, reflecting mostly local unstable conditions of the GPS antenna monument (e.g., local building movements) (e.g., Bock et al., 2012). National Geodetic Survey has operated continuous GPS stations at Key West, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Palm Beach Gardens. The GPS data of these sites were processed by the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory, who presents the results at GPS time series (http://geodesy.unr.edu/index.phP). The rates of vertical land movement at these stations are shown in Table 1 (Blewitt et al., 2015). It should be noted vertical land movement is non-uniform across South Florida as a result of geology variations and the non-uniform compaction of fill placed during development of the region. Subsidence at tide stations is closely monitored to ensure the accuracy of sea level rise measurements.The regional rate of sea level rise is affected by such localized subsidence and is accounted for in the regional sea level rise acceleration variable incorporated in the projections adapted for the region. 29 Table 1: Continuous GPS Operation in Southeast Florida (Blewitt et al., 2015) Vertical rate Site Location Duration (mm/yr) IMMIl ...t,:.,"r ti r,:.,.._::..:�......,,..,i.,..�:,.-....r;-n .,,:....:r�,,,;;..a....r,,„,.,._...d.,.....,......s..s.,...:,.,>...:..,...,^r;.....o..�:,..� ,n..,..g........ ~,..w.,S,.,_,...,.,.....a.::.u_..`k,..r,.,...,,,...:.;........,..::..rs...r.:;.:... v,2,.,..,,,::.....,.n..,,....,.h;,,.(v. an"y:., ,✓S.:a:n.:::..,?Ya,.A v" ti,:n,i::...,.,,..z",�<y,:£.,,;.r 5 a,,...,,..,.na�)".,.�M u :t�Y, ,,:.✓:7w.�,y".:ry..:U+,l.Mv , �1711",;/,‘11111:,),‘Infl,3i,,,,::4141 .ri,:. w � : 4, .i;#,i�,P '$uM h r2 ,g�n�H01✓nJxnna tu rWn:^;s .ra i "( rrZl gtNfi�,w,; '„r ' it� . , r� i �: KSM ,QfZ in& : r?aNc /t l KYW5 Boca Chica Key 2007 present 0.1±0.1 17 ...„...rr,..�a 4P,,:-.''',/wil-Ofkiirk,,,,,ii:gl,n ,a .y'am.:.;;.., t..,.•` v ; n,...'..Y` F ,w,_.....,:,,,.....:,,.r1:::::'-'::;', ���,r�� wi '¢,w.>;.k,p sKx1 C,p,f•,.r ”�5,'4 .. y ,•+te i KYW6 ir,a 3 >,akr ? ac ,,_ R :..!,2 4 ; VI� :c!,✓ tNroeya,1��A ;Yv:„,,,,my ti,+ � l 9,KWST , », a�W ,....K5,;,;,,,,.....eyy aWa est ai <rpod:rt"$k . .....x ".:ig„,. 2 0, 03,..... ps,r•e-::. esse:,,.n.:,:;'M•'S,nt k:�: ✓,..Y,.r;,ry 'r "1.'�5±k:$»0h.x 1 r» / :>�` y0 > � ; ya"yaWikwa :irNy� : ,: S ;vM„s,~-^^^r,, ,»w�vT "Ng fir q<t ^1ra� � �➢ , � Y loll a,r, ^(:Yr maw �b�ir�N wwpwr s 5.Mn3 d f ; ; $ � f r)�Ai uiiY�M 5 E: „t;1 /uA6, � !!,:i4,31,5451 �.,rkr�rz� i, d,MaS,,,r� �" ^�; ,742,:,,,i„ra, a,✓, ,, ”w ,—7-77 .wwiudr: ;W:rcu7„ewvw m [ I r/,aaaabNy.rM47ri'0„„,„.',75:724,✓ „✓, 4, 3 Fort Lauderdale Executive 2005-2014; LAUD -0.5± 1.1 Airport 2014-2015 IL;;7:;::::'';:':7:7::77::':g:::74;:g:;T'f',7,":1;L:>,/11Y», 1,rw;rd >nvnt,x;a77Ya /��+ amAis,/hrr+"i YrNf ;y1;i / G%r,":':';:j':, q 6 { :! //� ?. !A,bB"✓W,„kt�y:,';',,,;,17,;;;:i:,:',411;;;,?:/4:4:44,,, ' l'ittrftt:Vifit''IC: .L'v ,"i �/;l / k5Qw"w : 1n ,ar,p,i s1'_v*,�� , u51 FLC6 Florida -,., C,,a!i.,;.i.:y n,..:.::. 2 009..:,,:.::;,-r�...p, r e. sy.4,.,we ..`Y nt -1.8± 1.:8± 1.2 !,r, , aNH ^�w;. :2 � p Tr .^o;R%,a "�?,,;74:' JtiF: r n�P�"a7 ,A�l nJw�, a; m k,%�y;N r lb@% mw.,rNa�rqr ....✓y� t.,.�,� /. ti N n� nu�,xrwY> W,y ,A ,i�tr ,;18`,!”.'d ' ,� ,r k d , fr,r ,, �,.ota,Y ; Nr O �� -P,'� ,,", K: :"� mck, a �"9qr' n' 4 °✓�d4 40.0116C.!, u;; ' C ,F��xYcW'a7.,,, �/rw�r/,��.. �bs�„w r; n 4b,r, ! ,F l ems LpiC rRj�� ub ra r 9R�� ��;na, tr, ;, �, PB ,t �„4n,br,n !n a.rM.Yr�l, r"X Y/ ��,r 'N1„vaw,t x++., .t ',Y 2' � t.1: , W/ ��/�� ~ .c1z/r >H„5✓%„ wr / TL�� �r„�&FNi :�ar#/ ,irk 16 FY . v5id:„.n i�d' a f�S'.XvwnYmlarla,w,Mrkn r4. .Y,ddw " dn,� w"ww, d.f✓c” n 2�v�0 iry � t7�':tigia,vu ,„, n” 4YY,/ Nn Additionally, in some regions, the effects of changing ocean currents can further modify the relative local rate of sea level rise. Such is the case of the east coast of Florida, as is discussed in the next section, Ocean Dynamics, Gulfstream/Circulation OCEAN DYNAMICS, GULFSTREAM/ CIRCULATION Ocean circulation has changed little during the current period of scientific observation, but in the future it can considerably alter the relative rate of sea level rise in some regions, including Southeast Florida.A slowing of the Florida Current and Gulf Stream will result in a more rapid sea level rise along the east coast of North America. By 2100, these circulation changes could contribute an extra 8 inches of sea level rise in New York and 3 inches in Miami according to Yin et al. (2009). Most of the global climate models used by the IPCC(IPCC, 2007; 2013) project a 20- 30% weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), of which the Gulf Stream and Florida Current are a part. Measurements of the AMOC have yet to conclusively detect the beginning of this change, however there has been a report of a recent decline in AMOC strength by Smeed et al. (2014) that coincides with the mid-Atlantic hotspot of sea level rise reported by Ezer et al. (2013) and Rahmstorf et al. (2015). Recent analysis of the Florida Current transport has detected a decrease in circulation over the last decade, which appears to account 30 for 60% of South Florida sea level rise over the decade and contribute to a positive acceleration (Park and Sweet, 2015). If a long-term slowdown of the AMOC and Florida Current. Rahmstorf et al. (2015) use a proxy method also suggesting that a slowdown of the AMOC has begun. If a long-term slowdown of the AMOC does occur, sea level rise along the Florida east coast could conceivably be as much as 20 cm (8 inches) greater than the global value by 2100. According to the most recent estimates by the IPCC (IPCC 2013, FigureB-1), the combined differential due to regional ocean heating and circulation change along the Southeast Florida coast would be in the range of 10%-20% greater than the globally averaged rise by 2090. For a median (50% probability) sea level rise of one meter by 2100, this would give about 10-20 cm (4- 8 inches) of additional rise along the Southeast Florida coast, which is within the range of estimates by Yin et al. (2009). However, the IPCC models do not have the horizontal resolution required to effectively estimate these changes at the scale of the Florida Current and more research with higher resolution ocean models will be required.As such, it is prudent to add—15% to the global mean sea level rise values projected by the IPCC in order to use them for Southeast Florida planning. This adjustment is accounted for in the regional sea level rise coefficients incorporated in the projections adapted for the region. 31 Percentage Deviation from Global Mean:Figure 3.21 of Ch.13,AR5 j" _( 1, '----1 f ice ,. ,____ '''''5 ( ''' '' ' !ii: y %y% 1 \\\\ . itliL 1---,— 40 . ' ' ,,,.,,' .,,a a ' \ I 7 .„---- ps,,,e,,,,,,,,,,,i ,,,/,9 20 \',, ' '''!:'11,''',:'''H''''‘' ,lt:,„:,,„1, 1;;:,,,,' 1 u �\ >' ‘s , t4, 0 ,,,... 1:., ,1/4___________,,4 , r//�—,,..,,,,,,, 1 ,01 1 \ \ ' :, , , '‘M: /,/,',„' If17,10,,Wa-,: .,,..:':.1 / .., / 10 \ " i.tiv ''''s'\ , 's\;;;; ;;V/ ',8.40":„":/ tiA Of �'' 20 x /;�,�; Z‘'kX,lisqltii, 61' ,!/,,,''''r,,;/,:,; t::';!,,4,8,A.%"*'''.:,1,, ,.0.7'4.'.,0` //4//:/,'',',i''''r /,/,',;,' ' ' ,-,,,' ,',,,,e,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,„,,,,,,,,k;:,;',1,:,,,,:, f:/, .0,4,s;06:,;„4",7.`")*,,/';:,:.:1•7;,:';',,17.'';'0,4,;'''//'/'''''''''g' ',:,';',/aiPtillit,,Pilit -'' '' 21', ////N//N//r, ,„,,;: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,„.„/,„„„,„„,„,,,, ///ii/,,/'S5%/,,„, ////,,,,'—',10� / Figure B-1. Percentage of the deviation of the ensemble mean regional relative sea level change between 1986-2005 and 2081-2100 from the global mean value, based on Figure 13.21, IPCC(2013).The figure was computed for RCP4.5, but to first order is representative for all Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP). RCPs are the four greenhouse gas concentration trajectories adopted by the IPCC for its fifth Assessment Report(ARS). 32 APPENDIX Cw WOR GROUP COMMENTARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following are recommendations made by the Work Group for consideration by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact Steering Committee to be used by the Compact Counties as part of the implementation of the Regional Climate Change Action Plan. a. The unified SE FL sea level rise projection will need to be reviewed as the scientific understanding of ice melt dynamics improves. The projection should be revised within five years of final approval of this document by the Southeast Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. This timing is consistent with the release of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report which will provide a synthesis of the major findings in climate science to date. b. Users of the projection should be aware that at any point of time, sea level rise is a continuing trend and not an endpoint. c. The planet is currently on a high emissions trajectory for which committed sea level rise is probably near the high end of the ranges. It should also be noted that the attenuation of impacts through mitigation will not likely be sufficient to overcome the inertia of the climate system prior to 2060. d. Full and complete transparency of the projection and its implications should be promoted across the communities in order to encourage and guide effective and realistic planning, obtain realistic economic realities for maintaining functional infrastructure, insuring social and economically sound further development, and necessary adaptation. e. Further work to develop projections for the occurrence of extreme events in tandem with sea level rise may be necessary to assist communities in planning for storm drainage adaptation. 33 APPENDIX D: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARTICIPANTS The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties (Monroe, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties) and their partners wish to acknowledge the Work Group participants and members of the SE FL Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee for participating in meetings to support the development of the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection and the guidance document. The following members contributed to the development and refinement of the projection: Danchuk, Samantha, Ph.D., P.E. Berry, Leonard, Ph.D. Enfield, David, Ph.D. Gassman, Nancy, Ph.D. Harlem, Peter, Ph.D. Hefty, Nichole Heimlich, Barry Jurado,Jennifer, Ph.D. Kivett,Jeff, P.E. Landers, Glenn, P.E. Murley,Jim Obeysekera,Jayantha, Ph.D., P.E. Park,Joseph, Ph.D., P.E. Steelman, Marcia, C.F.M Van Leer,John, Ph.D. Wanless, Hal, Ph.D. Wdowinski, Shimon, Ph.D. 34 APPENDIX E: DEVIATION FROM 2011 PROJECTION The updated unified sea level rise projection includes the range projected by the 2011 unified sea level rise projection with three enhancements. As described in previous paragraphs, the yearthe projection begins was shifted from 2010 to 1992. Since the projection now references the sea level rise that has occurred since 1992 instead of 2010, the values in the projection are larger as a result of the sea having 8 more years to rise. For example, at the lower boundary of the projection, by 2030, sea level rise is projected to be 5 inches above the where mean sea level was in 1992. This is the exact same projected elevation as 3 inches above where the mean sea level was in 2010,just a different elevation datum. Table 1 shows the adjustment of values from the 2011 Unified Projection with a reference (starting) year of 1992. Please note the lower boundary is the same in both the 2011 and 2015 projections. The second enhancement to the projection was the extension of the projection past 2060 continuing to 2100. The third enhancement to the projection was the addition of the NOAA High Curve as the upper boundary after Year 2060. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper curve is recommended with planning values of up to 34 inches in 2060 and up to 81 inches in 2100. Table 2: Comparison of Unified Projection in 2011 and 2015 at Key West 201Y1.Unified 2011 Unified Projection 2015 Proposed Unified Projection Year Projection (adjusted to reference (referenced to Year 1992) f:4:;,,://44k,,„„),, r„ /`g.:J,r/,.,.,..,I...,.:..'t,.•w.^:.,r,,.r,,.�:.,,:rr.,:,',.d::'.�.s',.,v:smv:h...,r..:.,1:.,J.5!.,w,,:.! ,....,:,s!.,,....,.n..r,,.'.^.•.,'..::,,r,�,,„.:..;..,r.{.r..r,t..',.....+:;,,^r..,,..„.:S/•:.,.„w r.,+,Ji(!M Yw.,(�„w,T:,•a r...:,.:�':✓:.-.,r.',..�,vdr'.e,..:v:,,.&,':,,-.,-:r..•:'.,n.:.,,�..:::,'�',�, s,k q.,.+!/.•P'r.a..q,r:.;:.:;l" !...,/,',�..q:.r:,•s.rr:,.,:,,,.h::::”.,:,✓',:.�i;:'..• 5wI/4,1 ,...:..t'nb,:,:...r,,.ih..,:;!,a,.rr,,:.''.:„..::w.;/7.,,;.v:�^4r^,.,,,.:,,,.�,...,.'r:,,,/.:.w•,.<._,.,.�,,:,.,..�:..fi r y,�a..:.^,.�u..r.4r,,',.!;..•,r(,J...'„,,,1,•.:r,+/,.r,!/,,/•.d/'4,'rJ�1,.,/.y/;4...,.',.H•r,f.!.-f,c.r.J„•S�'•Yi,v•�' �:/rr!,p)M•:f,r!'iH/v/i''r."/..r rrw.:�.J.."rF . �,r.ir.,d.(./.•rro'C�/,,,h•,H.,.�,.":/ t•,.';,.':,,'':�:,....t;.'.! , •orr,••(r, •,r,�..f�L.'„g:/,:v:r'�l,:+w.r.t�''.Y y� 1:..: .,,:'•••:,:r:,:..".:.,.:.:,.•r,xr•pry,'..'.. e rr�/ri./is k Mr�,N•.,,. 1.uk nkr;qr,'..•,' z� � , / w d[yi �.:/^:.. t ir t r.. v4 l :.r 4 , S4 1 �y'. 7 /R i d ),y r, '...' /' �nk ., c n /+ : W'. r t', ,/ar `r(referenced to Year 2010) Year 1992) (inches above msl) (inches above msl) (inches above msl) tv � 1,c,,:' vY` � 4 ),,Al,G!Su^q,lk. k n n N/ pn!t J, /, Y.: '/ , ..r w �7Jr�, ( LI "!ir YR h �/ v / a R . yeR� /IT � b P�' {1:rP rI1IGMw r4,,,,'Y�J,'';'4,Z1'4„ !! .�0, �nnYhN^'Rnt�a , . dxf1's ; �iv" v;R , 11 III to ! x,Zdc 7 M 4v i ' 54 /6 ,F'< w1,2---',' a:wJ ',;',-,',1' ., < �1 7;I.I�'.{ aw //, 1:441/4(t ):111 �ivr r, 't , ''''/1/ Gvyd¢ 4� '> rr 1:21A sN r^H. ; a t„:1;;,,,,,,,;,74:;,,,, „ 4,a ,ii#/knr4ui�z,,t � y"WJ /, rNw i) / Ab 0 A t . ,,,,,i,,,,/d,;„...,/,1,���/;(��,r ��a�d 1 Z/RY�JnrwY y, / rRdrb , � / ZEn4„uk 9//k a M,a J I H . < 0n0 w 4,7' a/ Y- td.4„•"Jr!A)��'6//� ,� n/ (//: . ;. 6 � >r r / P^R ''"'''":''''''37,,T;', z>s7 7i , av :. G Jx( »' ,f / h.Jke .. n�wrkr i£rdlvwrw/ ,' yb ,203Q :i,,;,.,,;-::;,,-' :/!A t,',' b'roA,1b/,;.'r''''-''''''':'i 4 uwU!'-'zw''':'i `,:,,/,,,';',/r::::,,,7:',.://,;;2: 4, l WbAYy�a�F',' , z pwtarx� ',,,,�,,(,%(/ v f ''',4‘,,,,,,w'v,,,',',.1,,t/w1 , iYY,,,/,/,�a/�;�HJ,„ ,l � di 0, n/yrY �pa�"pg'ylt 11111 1, ,,,,Ygyr5v i<:4 t v"rIy Nr?) x4k J '�/�,,,Yi:///1:::::"" rti:#1,#!!”, y(r �,:�dW6i r) yy�•: Y af 200 rYSar+s'vN/$, /4 q4? ;an,M. J 1rL4 !���"�>rI 0 Y?ou�:o 't�/, vr�k.l/*wS ::�wn/�/,i i��, , W � j wzw�"M"rRwt'vl,� wGvr,ddaSµ /:,',...;:,,,3011, o , '24(11 aS �"yik�4�R ry,�1 t, i :/ t ,) , NmA ,,,,, A,//u'1�'NV 4Y/ /�k 1 d ip/Y/Y?';; qa #ya1,p»n^� 4i '�m' �" /` t ,a 4ul,-«R '-,,,,i, 4=, ykr� yw, 6 5r:� . v.G, v A � ��G �;#';',4,,,,,,,,,,4, ,/a ✓ :�MY IX�v fr s. /tlJ W r r i k ,2100 'Rn ¢f Mmo�' yy:&;�.w �b�r`IW�aLe7/,IXv/,at ,a ,r•Ym;nmor�dumM„,n :.�:. 35 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ) ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS 2017-129-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: MARCH 24, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: APRIL 24, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: m MIAMIBEACH Kristy Bada, Contracting Officer HI PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 I www.miamibeachfl.gov CA_ \' ! A 4: BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS& FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 28 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 30 APPENDIX G SAMPLE CONTRACT 32 RFQ 2017-129-KB 2 Af „ \! BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications(RFQ)is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal")to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda,whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently,the successful proposer(s)(the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City purchases treated potable water from Miami/Dade County, and resales it to its customers. There are multiple connections to the Miami/Dade County water transmission system. The City collects wastewater from its customers, including satellite cities, and conveys it to Miami/Dade County for treatment. This RFP is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). The City provided (at its most recent count) potable water service to an estimated 10,414 domestic retail water accounts, and to approximately 2,958 irrigation (water-only) accounts. Expressed on an equivalent residential unit ("ERU") basis, the System provided service to about 29,001 domestic water ERUs and 8,443 irrigation ERUs. An ERU represents the average capacity for a single-family residential account (served by a 5/8-inch meter), and is used to measure the total customer base on an equivalent basis (how many total equivalent households are being served) significantmay since a number of customers represent a single account that serves a large group of customers (e.g., a condominium), or commercial customer that uses a large amount of water (e.g., a hospital or school). The ERUs were based on information published by the American Water Works Association regarding meter capacities, and which form the basis for the determination of meter equivalent factors. The City provided (at its most recent count) sanitary sewer service to an estimated 10,414 retail sanitary sewer accounts, and 29,001 sanitary sewer ERUs (all domestic water customers receive sanitary sewer service). The City also provides wholesale sanitary sewer to the Village of Bal Harbour, the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the City of North Village, and the Town of Surfside(collectively,the"Satellite Cities"). The City is over 100 years old, and many of its infrastructure assets are believed to be aged, including installations completed early in the City's inception. Improvements, and expansions have been made throughout the City's history, and a comprehensive review of the entire water, and wastewater infrastructure needs to be performed. It is the City's intention to develop, and implement a long-term capital improvement plan to best position the community with a resilient, robust, environmentally responsible, and future proof, water, and wastewater system to serve into perpetuity. Additionally, it is important that Proposers shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. RFQ 2017-129-KB 3 CIA %Ali\/V\ BEACH Through this RFQ, the City desires to receive proposals from qualified firms that can provide professional services, in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The City may, after considering proposals received, award contracts for services to a prime consultant(s), as well as create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants,as follows: 1. Prime Consultant(s).The City may make an award to qualified consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant on its long term capital improvement projects for water and wastewater.The selected prime consultant shall provide the City with subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its water and wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant, it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest. Additionally, the City reserves the right to engage other consultants,either through option 2 below or through other means, to assist the City in its water and wastewater endeavors. The prime consultant shall be selected in accordance with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act for related projects as defined in Section 287.055(2)(f)(2), Florida Statutes. As such, the scope or value of the work awarded to the prime consultant shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes. 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants. Additionally, to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and q Y wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants (not selected in Option 1 above) in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants.The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. The process for considering qualifications proposals shall be as follows: 1. City will consider proposals received on or before the due date. 2. All responsive proposals will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager for evaluation in accordance with the criteria established herein. Proposals deemed non-responsive will not be considered by the Evaluation Committee. 3. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section 19 below, one (1) or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. 4. The City intends to contract with a single prime proposer, but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers, in accordance with Subsection 2.1 above. There is no project value limit on the work to be performed by the prime consultant. 5. Other responsive, responsible and best qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Subsection 2.2 above. Projects awarded to consultants in the continuing pool shall be limited to$200,000 for studies and design or engineering services shall be limited to projects with construction budgets under$2 million. GIVEN THAT THE CITY INTENDS TO WARD A PRIME CONSULTANT AND ALLOW OTHER RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE AND QUALIFIED PROPOSERS TO BE INCLUDED IN A CONTINUING POOL OF PREQUALIFIED CONSULTANTS, ALL QUALIFIED FIRMS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND TO THIS RFQ. RFQ 2017-129-KB 4 al- AA I Atv\ B EAC H 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued March 24,2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting April 5,2017 at 10:00AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions April 14,2017 at 5:00PM Responses Due April 24,2017 at 3:00PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA• MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV additionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.gov: or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City,a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFP Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3RD Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER:5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. RFQ 8 1 -1 •-KB 5 m WI BEi\ H 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES .. CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES . CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE . CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. RFQ 2017-129-KB 6 I BEi\ H 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters(five (5) days in advance when possible),or information on access for persons with disabilities. 9 For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374,the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. R Q 01 -1 •-KB 7 t-r-4 ` , iAiN BE H 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals, include prime consultant(s) and continuing pool of prequalified consultant(s). The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2- 369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City,or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer(s)to determine the prime consultant(s). Other proposers not selected as prime consultant that are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified, as recommended by the City Manager and approved City Commission, are eligible to participate in the continuing pool of prequalified consultants. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. The City may impose a ceiling on hourly rates to be allowed under the contract. Firms that do not accept the ceiling on rates may be eliminated from further consideration. 21. POSTPONEMENT/CANCELLATION/ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date.A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. R e I -1 •-K: 8 \; BEACH 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS&ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors,and/or agents,from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented,or unpatented invention, process,or article manufactu red or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device,or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. RFQ 2017-129-KB 9 tv\I Aiv\ B EAC H 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers,employees, contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances,the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. RFQ 2017-129-KB 10 [� MI MAI BEACH 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation;then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. RFQ 2017129-KB 1 1 11-1 NA'AM BEACH 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with,and comply with,all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities,favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2017-129-KB 12 CA___ r'V1 AMIBEACH 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s)that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases,the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract,to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2017-129-KB 13 ,AV B E AC H SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile,are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents.The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. Experience and qualifications should demonstrate the firms experience with vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and awareness of incremental adaptation over time. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. Experience and qualifications should demonstrate the firms experience with vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise;familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and awareness of incremental adaptation over time. 2.2.1 Subject Matter Expert(s). Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individual(s)who as proposed will be selected to serve as the Subject Matter Expert(s). Proposers must identify and submit evidence for the following Key Personnel: RFQ 2017129-KB 14 . 4 - BE. H f a. Water Distribution System b. Wastewater Collection System c. Water Pumping Stations d. Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations e. Water Distribution Design Engineer f. Wastewater Collection Design Engineer g. Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer h. Corrosion Control and Corrosion Remediation 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City,of the SQR directly from Dun&Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores!servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800424-2495. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, strategies for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory re ulato action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2017-129-KB 15 iV Ami B EAC H !G SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager.The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Procurement Department. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications,including Financial Capability 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three (3) years from the due date for proposal. See Section 4 5 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2017129-KB 16 LbtVJ, !V\, BEiH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Procurement Department. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission,which may be different than final ranking results.The City Manager is not bound by the results of the Evaluation Committee Process. 6. Award Recommendation. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section 19, one (1) or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. The City intends to contract with a single prime proposer, but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers. All other responsive, responsible and qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants. RFQ 2017-129-KB 17 APPENDIX A M1AM BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 • e Si -1 •-K: 18 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2017-129-KB WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. R Q I -1 •-KB 19 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017129-KB 20 •. . • • a f 4!1 . •- • •.••• • _•• .. a• •• ••-••-• f a as !•••: . ••• ••. ._••e •- •• ••- "••_: •a- a ra a a• ••-r " - —•_••• ^- a •- • -a • a• -•-• •-r•• • a -•• :- • . •:•, -u •• • •••- to- • J••a a- - •• • •.••u. . . • • a- -•••••-. • •. • •a •• a ar .•.•• • •••a -••-• • i __ • a • a a••a•. .a a•••. • -•.• -• ••.• • - •-. ••• •• .•t a. 1 ••..•• • •a•_ .• -- 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. R e Ii -1 •-K: 21 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on th*convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. R !► Si -1 •-KB 22 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disdosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2017-129-KB 23 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2017-129-KB 24 APPENDIX B el MIAMI BEACH " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: it is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. RFQ 2017-129-KB 25 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: -Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond -Specifications unclear or too restrictive - Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: KRISTY BADA STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS##2017-129-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 26 APPENDIX C M1AM BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFD 2017-129-KB 27 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. PRIME PROPOSER: 1. The Prime Proposer(Engineering Firm) shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations,as applicable. REQUIRED SIMILAR EXPERIENCE: 2. The Prime Proposer shall submit no less than five (5) projects completed within the last ten (10) years completed exemplifying experience in water, and wastewater system improvement projects. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, start and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email),volume of contract, prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The Consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its Water and Wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. Proposer shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. The services described in items I, and II are a priority and are intended to be awarded immediately.The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future. I. Develop Water System Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 1.Prepare a description, and general inventory of the water distribution system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing water distribution system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2.Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure.The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. II. Develop Wastewater Collection System CIP 1.Prepare a description, and general inventory of the wastewater collection system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to- date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing wastewater collection system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2.Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority RFQ 2017-129-KB 28 developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure.The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. Ill. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Master Planning IV. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Hydraulic Modeling V. Water and/or Wastewater Systems expansion and/or replacement construction design, including pumping stations VI. Construction Management VII. Value Engineering VIII. Various studies, reports,etc. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFC 2017-129-KB 29 APPENDIX D 0--T M1AM BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 30 1.TERM OF CONTRACT.Three(3)years. 2.OPTIONS TO RENEW.Two(2)additional one(1)year options 3.PRICES.Not Applicable. 4.EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5.INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6.PERFORMANCE BOND.Not Applicable. 7.REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8.SHIPPING TERMS.Not Applicable. 9.DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS.Not Applicable. 11.BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested,either through a separate agreement,work order,letter of engagement or purchase order. 13. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER.A change in the Consultant's project manager(as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the City project manager). 14. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 15. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services,deliverables and cost of services. RFQ 2017-129-KB 31 APPENDIX E m MAMBEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 32 m MAMBEACH , INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability$ 1,000,Q00.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in"insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: _Builders Risk completed value $ .00 _Liquor Liability $ .00 _Fire Legal Liability $ .00 _Protection and Indemnity $ .00 _Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured.Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2017-129-KB 33 APPENDIX F _C-1A INA AM BEACH Sample Contract RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 34 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- R 0 I 1 -1 •-KB 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 37 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 42 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 46 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 48 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 48 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 49 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 50 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 51 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 51 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 51 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 53 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 53 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 54 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 54 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 54 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 55 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 59 SCHEDULE B 61 SCHEDULE C 63 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 64 ATTACHMENT B 65 ATTACHMENT C 66 RFQ 2017-129-KB 36 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on , the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No._ , respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. RFQ 2017-129-KB 37 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission"shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants RFQ 2017-129-KB 38 acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record"for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00)or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. RFQ 2017-129-KB 39 DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance- oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Proiect Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. RFQ 2017-129-KB 40 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A- Consultant Service Order Schedule B-Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C -Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: 'Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. RFQ 2017129-KB 41 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and RFQ 2017-129-KB 42 Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In RFQ 01 - •-KB 43 addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to RFQ 2017129-KB 44 promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. RFQ 2017-129-KB 45 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and RFQ 2017-129-KB 46 acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information.The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission RFQ 2017-129-KB 47 on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator(which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. RFQ 2017-129-KB 48 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). RFQ 2017-129-KB 49 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by RFQ 2017-129-KB 50 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices']), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its RFQ 2017129-KB 51 performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant(1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or(3)does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. RFQ 2017129-KB 52 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents(for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. RFQ 2017-129-KB 53 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement,with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: RFQ 2017-129-KB 54 City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant RFQ 2017-129-KB 55 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. RFQ 2017-129-KB 56 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. RFQ 2017-129-KB 57 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name RFQ 2017129-KB 58 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND RFQ 2017-129-KB 59 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. _ for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Prosect Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (RFQ 2017-129-KB)you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date RFQ 2017-129-KB 60 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month,for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. R 171 -KB 6 1 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017-129-KB 62 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS RFQ 2017-129-KB 63 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM RFQ 2017129-KB 64 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ) RFQ 2017-129-KB 65 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ RFQ 2017-129-KB 66 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ Detail by Entity Name Page 1 of 2 4,11*Org Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number/ Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation TRU-GREEN CONSTRUCTION, INC Filing Information Document Number P10000096209 FEI/EIN Number N/A Date Filed 11/29/2010 Effective Date 11/24/2010 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 4952 NW 7TH AVE 6 MIAMI, FL 33127 Mailing Address 4952 NW 7TH AVE SUITE 6 MIAMI, FL 33127 Registered Agent Name&Address ORPHE, FRANK 4952 NW 7TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33127 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title P ORPHE, FRANK 4952 NW 7TH AVE MIAMI, FL 33127 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 04/26/2015 2016 04/28/2016 2017 05/01/2017 Document Images http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 1 0/1 7/20 1 7 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 2 05/01/2017—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2016—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/26/2015—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2014—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2013—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/2012--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/30/2011—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/29/2010—Domestic Profit I View image in PDF format , - - - - http://search.sunbiz.organquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 1 0/1 7/20 1 7 ,.,•",t.'•'�!r".,;:�i.'G. 'a;..,.',`v.,r.';!„.,.,'.t:.nA,".,(.G:''.'.'.'.,:...eS.•:,::.'.u�'•.,•:a',..[,._p.J....,..../L./.n:'• r y....,..,,•r.,,w„,..,,',,�.,.,......r:,',..-...,...s...:,.,..; .c,.�...0.\......•.... ...,,:...:..,„,...�h,:!t..r.y,.R;;ryr:,r,r,6c,,,.+.,°.,..►.;,.-^r:..,:.::.:..:/,..a''rr.: .......,.'..� ...,,...e.....,.:.... i,.n .♦',A.?„f..r.,.;./a.. r.V .....� ..,..,.....,,..... . ...r,.. .^. ,b.,,•,.”.r.,r,, ,,,..,,.,.,..,,aro...,.'...,,..// ♦' : ` .�... ./. .. ..,,.,.„ ...::. ,'. ,,_... n... .„.,...,` .s ,ol.. a..,..r X 4.., . .:: . /..".. .:. .,..', _.. • 74_ jr: CI ,.,r,tain n ...,. , ,r , ¢G[H'mG ,L ra zr/ , r/. 1, , :Mra/ /./ J r , r,hi„, „ ,h/ FY!!, /r . I/ � /,rr ,/t / .7777R./r // ./n/ ,�/ /, r , /r ., , i.,:, r ,, rr,.„ im / /. / / .„, r n,.,,✓ ,.x•yG� r/ S. /r, 1 / / / r/,, „ rl/fv,r/,i,!rr �p r�rY/J, y � , , , ,r/rr , „ / . ✓/ B� n//l/ /„rr,/ r7774/, //(/i ,/ , . . /�n! � � ! r / � 4a.w „ ,/!udI.riHl,> , ` �/u r/[,iN/. /,t J/r,/ � L y/ ,/rr,,n,, Nr/be4,,r,uru u9 ,,..._ `��, //,r/ r, 14x,, r ./ � ri A,--/-*''''''''''' a%ewrx(,,i! 4','''''',;',O. ,X.r a rr/d/� / ra// / n// /,Y1 . ., ..„ MtAMFBEAó#t ,H / /% te// , ',. / r s�.:/�4 � :iI / .. / , „,,. /i . e1:,,,; .i7,4„1.,,,#)/7'3,01;'''''''''''''',/:,"'' ..rr „A,a�/,w,;r as,' .5�y -�rN'/. � ; a /f i ., J , , e. ,,. i , �r/ .r:ha,,r a-n SrM , .� � v r,,,/(yv'Y!,l/ i .,l . 4., v(, ,,., Vii,d. r ,,,/ , a,//rr•,G ,,: r�>.`,;. ,� 1K�\, e'°\”b�•/dHi' ��ren//d/!x.. ,/ ..L ,, .. m ,�*,r i! , . .,:. �/,ya�vr!C,;,a'1n', l! �$Ya9;r;�.. 0< 4 !�r+G,���i, ♦♦tirr„rj/./rn . ///I fi .,,/ /N ,. � ./ a,/ , , , . ,0 , m, ,,.M �,!n• ,s rbk; a/ q ' C4s/ .. ri , //, ,,r , /, , g .. . ''',41:4:: . :Y •� 3k .v,rr,KvarAJ;d�A rro Ha , \«,° w � wIl'I'":—'".'"-----56:---'—'4'..* 1w� ww-7i/fI/ , a/,/a1 , ,iGr . ,''',,,,,,,4',.'"'y . ,„ .. ,y gr , N1'/. i ''''''7''''''''':r 7<�i :-.47ol/h , /5./r ,, , ,^' f r{r «!i ',...,:lit ,.;Pw4 � 7m-.« i...,20„4/.,, .em,. r. r.r�irs ., ,„,(h„4,/ :.yJ/? ✓. k ♦ A//rL /!.��wry�k///.4✓H r,x//N �YfMaa/l / r '.. p S ' ` �X�y H/.„H rr,,4�// °i///LJ.�%,,tioirHr / G��r.6 • ti v,� a,„o,,,,,,,,,,.0.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t.',.:,,,,,,/,„ rsri,� J�y !/ �c�, RJi! , w—nmM ,,.1y,,r . ,� q, NyS,„J$y,a/ ” ”R %yH/a�� ,_ i JN ! f/ ` y/%rAf y x �I ry �rk ! i i ; .:,,,,t,,,,o,,,,,,;,,,,,,rn �hly a "�p4:yruJh,r ,;fra/(i//r/rH o fiJ��7 // / v, ' r , \/,',v.;.1,4,,,,,!'"?/"."'",,,;,”' 6//; !%i«r r/; q r ., 1. r. • . ' . . . , , ,.. El ii. 111 ti- ,,,..,_.,,,, ', 1 ._,...1: ,, ...., . P . ,, i___ .. , ,:, ' ; . , ,,, ,,, ..„.,,...„,,--- ,. ., ,,„,,...,_— , [ •, — — . .♦'�/ '+kv ,--., y b ii......... -,— ...— t ,1, ,, i ' i, , ,. , 1 ... ., 1 1 .,.. •' , , i ., — ' A � _lit),.... ..... , • ..... , -- v°� � • ♦r , ' 1.,__,_,,,,__, ..4.,,,,,, ,.._. , ,,,,, , .,.. ,,, , „, i I.. , , , - , ,.„, _. ,,,, - . ,,, , :,- „ , ” it • — . - , .,,,,.., ,,,,„1„,,,„"...-,.., . , ” ,\h C ”y• • -----:',.-..,,,,,,..:,....4t,,,... ..,,.,,,,,,*,,,,r,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,:‘,,,,,,,, MIr " u.a,w,ww`"4wi '..-7,,.,-,4,„.;,4,1;T,,,,,,,,,,77 ..,,,,.. wwnwxx,fa4,,,,,7 .;ww . FOR a dn,a ". IFICATIONS RFQ SPROJECTSt• pc1 " . LWATER SYSTEMST FORQUAR & WASTEREQUEWATE0111U111110 "Ii""""" .an,W .11.141,.::::,,,,,,,,.!,,,,..,,,4:..,,.., � V" a�-• w1M tlC �Se/ w".�,.ww�wSCa �ay ENGINEERINGSERVICESFOR20A1PR7I-L1225,920-1K7B , : � �,, ° w cy s. fix � � Cr 4L �K�.,1V � Y •ww�M '.ar" ,,,,..., ,, „, --,s' „,4 s, ,. L s � /Ya r< /taiii:. � ` ♦, v -'Ma ( ' ,a, • .w "^ �a9; a r"�t M. !: -a\ � --71-1191141. "yiaw_M �Mtv�a,�Y f „rb; r W},�"d' Mt "4 „if-..:7:•,,, A�M ." a .�, � - t ti -1a,+ ` Codmgge, " •a�A1 __.$7,14,.. A ` ♦ ,� : : ' sFlwAA ~�f. S o °, 7..,..,—,..-:t.:,,,_-_. n• S '' .111.. ,—,..., ,, , ., ,. , '', . , ° • ' gqi , ivr, , .0. , ..; ,.,. . Y--4.,..t.,, W r Ma1 „ ��� �'y Jucns ` ;Y N \-,,,,;,14 f . ,,,•%.„1.,t."1 ! R^ � x «^ �,f „1,1:,,,,,,„r:?' �r,� "wet}vvim"wrM', �\\'4�"':\''''': \\`ypF'a �, \�C p'''''''''';:',4,\N'".7 y'+^�°�\\;p\\\�\� C\ ' gyW �M� .,w •� 'M ”5;ee , .,:,,,,,,,.•:,,..s.,',,.2.,,,,, �':e �.,: Fni7,11,, . , .��. v \ ,'� 4;:;,� .kr- &�» `a � . L r 4...,;\.;;, *wvyrt`•y;` A. w xr ? �r, ',;4Y i., n M 'ror , ru � \\,-4� i �/ "I'' nw wr_`yx „,� '7, , 17� � . � / 3 —/ � / _�-'►.—� ! «w+ "L , ^.r : � . t .Y"WADETIu,W w \Cir • <• Z / •=1J -—�, yi • C ff I',Ya."bi.T :e' �;•!-,.. st.*wk”—,-,;,•=t5 Date♦A!,♦.S1� �.e.��^F y?w " w\a " .:..,,,,,-'4.:i,,:‘.:.„:4::.:,..:'::),-.*,-..----,,.--, .n�« '.: w^• _�' :::,.'-'?..3.',:,,t.,,, k Wu ,. +a^; »'-':',‘,,,..:::::.'"'Ss' .a,f” a•`aV, ' i + � sIeZ � q♦yti�,p .{,7 ,," 44yn" ,t`L " . !r . 1r ` +,Y,4±",,, rr,rhW ,s� ` ;'ESw "Ss + „,,,;,•:2,;,.......,•,, .,” .r^otiC"«g,yz ,,,,,,,, pwI „fir/u,.,//.,/„ / 1/ ..,r./r r/ ,/,// 1r ././..,! /!,/fir ,/ ,//r.r/.!/ ,.,r.,/ / / /// /',, !q� �,i . J .,if /.�.., ./i �,., /,. ./... /.. c ,, ! .,., ,y /1. /.�,s/ , , .. ,.,. /,.,, moi,//,... ., ,/., s : . , ,. '''''''''4'''''''''''''''''''''''' ..' ;:. / // / 4;, � A r„/./, /rrrr,/,/ // , ,, , ./ !, ,.,./// r,./., /,a e.r / �!r r i r as„ ... / u,, ../. ,r/r/ , /,..r /,,,/,., ./lir.,,, ,// !/,. .,./�.� /!. ,/ ,/� /r ... , ... : ,::,.... :..:,.„ ..�xr,a ,........,. ,!/ Glr�../!/B',./,/�rat8,,.%/���� ,15"?r:yf/ ,'r�� r/. ,r/ : / ' �. .. , ��r�AJ/r,.w1I/.,r..u.....,r„,n,,, e, c,/„�r,•e,ari+rvr Ar,rrw/-„rm,:,:.,,/,,,; ,,,ru"aA.,/J r/,n;,.,,.,,r r tiY,�!'�� »r'u»r//�,, r �p .: .,,,.;y. Y : ;,;,, x rux r,r ,.„, ,,, ,,. u:,µ Y�yr✓✓���rr4 h r� �/ /h w's�'k! /' J y/is /y,Hi. /v�:�' p r♦`� ft� ,4,.s, -.. , � '�r�� ,;,,,,,,...„,,:„.44.01,./...„,.0„.1..:...:,„:.,,,, 4 r':b7��/ a'�H V ,�+ � k,,A � , r N /✓d/ A 1M vlG /`//' l �'"J:I S'/'// !,.H , .,,,,,,,,,,..,/,;;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .� :. ' '{I / s i,'r s/ii g 4 //s y'!s J/f/�y �A r yo°• °r,/Y/>/Y „,,-,..,,,,,,,',,,.•:,,, r,as,,„,„n,- // .."';',./..,'.' r 7 / rs u/7 i;,�/�/r6J,'r��/rH)r �%!�F�Q'lN�a•/ r, \ °M”,p a _�__ kyr/F l r�,�L//F,l, ''..,,9'.4;/;1',.�, Y:;t ;�/f ”.(�✓rh�^';;A",;;'),,,,:.��J4;n ry ��.w,Y�AA� „t +w`�r.. �'`,�� �..,.._. w / y /��6 6 4 /9 1 4 �w 6 / a�,r r n A„r I r, YP' Y �y S u m �/• 4k� !{/ /h'1! /S r`��.ham�°%/� / !�S r/i/!,!!Y� >4`�%lYl"7f ,, y� t , APIN iii �,`:. .'.� x,. � yam( � i� # 11 + � : alllk w ,� ° M • I : ..., \ • vR �• i ..•per 4 4 1 ........ ............... .., u ` ww 1 ....t.';'•:•.,;•",.,,,,i••'..”— .',' ''.:27 . .... • r s. na\ ...,.. . ■+!.,.,.:•».....►.....,..,, *"'sem e:. '"'``+..\.,,, , .....:4t,:::::.,,,.,,,•:,....,,, ^ G n, ,a ,.. ''„ w.. ,, H ,.',.,,,•,'',,,,,,,,,,' .,\,a,rN":".:':' ,.....5...,,,,,.....,s. y >.U4..s: : �,r r :.4 a • . '...:•....!:'..W1:77'. „ ^w .,”^rX sA '. "a , 5 A :.:4 ,.,,„..:.,..,‘ .__ ., ,,,‘,.. ..,,,,,,,, ,,., , .. ...... .., _.„. . . ...,,.„,..• , ,: ,,,,,„ , ,...... .,..,, ,. ,.:,, . .,,,,, ,,,. ,..,.,. ,... '.. ... . . ,._,.., , ,,, , , , . ., , . , . . „. . , , „ , ... ..„.. . , ,, . . .,,,.. ., . , .• .., ,, , , „„ , . „ .„, „ ,.„, ,,,.. ,. , ,.. . . ....,..,.\, ,.„ „ , ,.., .„,„,,.,„,,,.„: . .... :‘,..,7 ,'''.;',,,,,?F,....:•,'''''''''"' .,..,..,....;:lPt,, 4"'",i...:•••,, w a� ; , • :,.. .. .. . 47 r, \ 4„a^uaxaA,�aHt`ir�a;y ��i�, 3a�.fiv/n�A,\A 'V:a,,\aawaci:•o iAa w. S^F,‘ V COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS r A w P^Z, \Xirt•x. aMlo$E� `Fq �'f Ha ryg 4Yrc xarr y� 'yr w ,`.: , 1tJift1lJIIU!1III1I "1I1J' ""'"''::::,,,: .1 � .:.1 7 v , , N .:, .., . ..,.......,...... ..,..,,., ',..'::.''.'' .""'.Ot' ' , * `a�^ ° 1 °�3 ,' ,+r n.; 7Aw", v.,..., 4\ ikti, ;,..- .. ,,,� �.��„�\ .. � s � ? „"• � t � YDS?:s a,.,4.:.' � �!:$' .. .-,i ' ''''..:''.'';':- ..—7•••*-' ' '''' ---1;.:4.:11::,:,:ii'''''*' ' gip;.; ra q , ;��� ,;,, ^ ` w:« Co,of coding Legend 111.4,---„„).„4, A\ 4 mak k w . ..,� ►" ! uW„ \\ \, Junction:Fee Flow(Arailabie!(gpm) + W k , 1, it'S4bP .';'‘.!''N''' '"— ' k• t7'41. '1' ''''.'. I '''. 46-• A ___rN-.: fl( b \ wok � Y.r � _�.—� ei" x� \';�ry,,,1p f4�Y •M;:u ",,,,,,• .. M ,,...„!,E. ”.,,, ,,,,,,:4;,t,:46,1 4 � A ...--‘,9-7''-‘,-', ^ �\. �0C\°"-,,,,:ii'0.;.:.4.'::,,,, .‘,Ziiii.'...-4.,-.?: < 75(t• — 5°° kL Ile fes— ,..''�— ' ' ''''::.,-.,';',7,,:,,,,,,,,,..,' ,,,,'''.1 ''''-' k.,,,,,,..„7.7: ..41'''''''.,..‘,,...1,1 • '' l'" t.,,j, rf-•--1 0,, 0..—._._,_.4_,...._,,,, , tI �/'. �` k"�" qJ • <: j.2� t 1!\ r�-.__7 Esq a,xL.,,,,,_,_,,Ts.,\/, v;� . /r�' a - � f �� r`� �.!i., n ' ' ''''''-i; ' '' •'�`'� jfl. • /���� .1,—,,,,____.---..--..._,, , ..,:',...,,,'.,44'.'". K*� • ' .'''.'"':.•i,'',".','" >`.�,a . _ '''-•''.� Zw:• y ..f..e IW» A11t �`» ..b 7� ����-tiA 5� .,p 4 `" +.� ] "`,^^', '' ,\_�! i .s. ""Ts,,;1�h.a a.a '''';''.4:s..'_ `010 ,,y.,,�•:.x:. /� .---•_' 7 ,..o �' 'x '�k� .. ';�J..l�n.•\,`»,a`�ee ,;:::: �+`a.'�.Q�� `�e � ���BIR'.�'J�"'��y '.'M''1" wu VMka" �.ro...;,..'47,:r.',...,--....W.� y „.. y�.*° �`- i. , 1,,, � 1,,,,,,„4,,,...„,„,,,.,,,,,,,,...,,,...•.• � .. +.rIC.� SMR';:t'^.+.F,. �:1 T�.,S�:�” "M1�,,.". . �n..T "f'k +. y o h .. er. .q„T-.•. +'V' •..: �.Fn'A.,w. .:� is r r/,........,. �:': ,::.:is r. ,,::, , ., :.:. „ / , ../,,,,,,,,,,,,,, `�', :::Y,. /.,..,.. .....,. ., :......,, ��,.. ,1.r //. ,.,.,.,.. .,..,..._. ,...,..,: ..:.. .,. n,.<„ ab,/ /.. / 7/ //�{,/. lei,,.,.,// ':i ::'. :.: ,..,..,..,r,.:/_,..^,,., /,.,./ ,/ 1.,./ / .-�.h///,A./1 ,, ;o,, //'/a �: ..; ,.:'.>:- .,:rrrr :./.,.,. /,i/aAm,:/ /,;:, /.,.✓,.,1/,+4 /.�.,,�.:.,�.L.,.//. ./k ?.l/ / / //// ,,, it r// iii //r y/f/ //f.�! , ,'•: :is , / , / /,/ // .i r/ //!/�,/, ,: /// :/! it':,%Ir// / ,;,:',:,,•.:',,,,,,,'.,:,:,:!„,;,,,!1.-. r i//. IN WA1)ETRIM , . , April 25, 2017 .� Mr. Alex Denis, Procurement Director City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Re:Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-129-KB Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects Dear Mr. Denis and Selection Committee: The City of Miami Beach has passed its 100th birthday celebration, and is faced with significant challenges with both aging infrastructure and utility capacity,stormwater system performance, and increased service facilities. In addition,the City's vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise has made headlines throughout recent years with headlines, photos, and videos related to both rainy-and sunny-day flooding. To provide their residents, businesses, and tourists with the uninterrupted level of service they deserve and are accustomed to, Miami Beach is seeking a prime engineering consulting firm to guide the City through development and prioritization of a long-term capital improvement plan (CIP)for its water and wastewater systems. In addition,the City is devel- oping a library of professional engineers to provide as-needed water and wastewater services. Wade Trim, Inc., the Proposer for this Statement of Qualifications, is excited to assist Miami Beach in the delivery of the program discussed in the RFQ. Qualifications Summary Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida consulting engineering firm helping local and regional governments create livable,sustainable communities through practical and innovative solutions.Starting in 1926,Wade Trim complet- ed utility designs for municipalities.As work grew in response to changing client needs,our staff and offices have expanded to nearly 400 employees in 19 offices throughout the eastern United cwt /po ; States.Wade Trim is consistently ranked among the top design and environmental 0 i f � �M 0 firms and continues to be nationallyrecognized for innovative :up � g solutions. Nearly : i90%of our business is from re eat '� �LA; p clients,a testament to our commitment to ' * client relationships.We are excited to expand our commitment to Miami Beach in rie 1resolving its infrastructure challenges. a ..1. For nearly four years, Wade Trim has been at the forefront of Miami Beach's sr. response to climate change and sea level rise.The first neighborhood to have x �',- \ "-'''' elevated roadways and enhanced stormwater pumping systems implemented, �� � Sunset Harbour,was designed by Wade Trim.Since that time,we have designed ����� ��� " � infrastructure improvements for Palm & Hibiscus Islands and Espanola Way,and , • • '"';s.,',,,'•-.w are under contract for drainage, infrastructure, and streetscape improvements in ` "''"4. the City's high-profile 1st Street corridor. Sunset Harbour - Elevated Roadway Wade Trim,Inc. (p)786.361.1645 2100 Ponce de Leon Blvd (f)786.361.1646 1 Suite 970 www.wadetrim.com Coral Gables,FL 33134 BUILDING RELATIONSHIPSON A FOUNDATION OF EXCELLENCE RFQ No.2017-129-KB Cover Letter,page 2 "'w ;,,.;; Wade Trim has not only remained on the leading edge of the City's [\/j � C sea level rise and resiliency technology,we have been active in - educating the public and other stakeholders through presentations, • technical papers,and events throughout Miami-Dade County. n‘ .TAKES :Atir:S_j..A1VD Experience Summary AA "y Over the years,Wade Trim has completed a significant number of _p water and wastewater master planning,CIP development, hydraulic 47.P ���' Y Mq $ '12' modeling,and collection/distribution/pumping collection/distribution/pumpingdesign projects and studies.As a full-service firm,our civil engineering experience also Journal Florida Engineering society,January 2015- includes site development,stormwater control,traffic engineering, Miami Beach Takes a Stand on the Edge of a Rising electrical, parking lot design,drive access, roadwaydesignpermit- Sea article. g , ting,water and wastewater treatment, reclaimed water distribution, utility design and relocation, pipelines,and plumbing.Wade Trim's ability to successfully complete these types of projects under an "as-needed" contract has allowed us to maintain long-term continuing services contracts with more than 25 municipalities and clients throughout Florida alone.This experience shows that for us to be suc- cessful,all of our projects must be successful, meaning Wade Trim will not only understand the projects we are working on, but we will also stay abreast of other City projects,since they relate to the overall capital program the City delivers. Miami Beach is already familiar with several of Wade Trim's staff.Wade Trim is currently working on three neigh- borhood improvement projects in the City of Miami Beach;one as part of a design-build team,and two design projects.Through these projects,we have not only become familiar with the City's standards and procedures, we have assisted the City in developing some of the details and standards used in neighborhood infrastructure sea level rise projects today.Through these activities,we have had the opportunity to develop positive working relationships with several City of Miami Beach staff. Wade Trim is proud of our firm's background and experience,and appreciates the opportunity to submit this statement of qualifications to the City of Miami Beach.We look forward to continuing our professional relation- ship while assisting the City in delivering the exciting project types discussed in the RFQ. In the Spirit of Service, WADE TRIM, INC. • / Holly Kremers, PE Vice President hkremers@wadetrim.com 2017-129-KB 2 MIAMI BEACH Tab a " y otz 'N. ) :87" to \ \\ Ititr4 .a\ i .. mow."°„';,� -. a,.,„y� • �'A 1M",\ •'r. ",,,R ,'•e d'FW +;r>yyC\\\ 7'• sir ��4rn ' eau„ ,•„'.. �.. •• ��.:�”. ,Mr"."aC.. COVER LETTER& MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter&Table of Contents 1 Cover Letter 1 Table of Contents 3 1.2 Response Certification,Questionnaire& Requirements Affidavit(Appendix A) 4 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 10 Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 16 Firm History 16 Firm Experience 16 Project Profiles 21 SRF Experience 29 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team 31 Organizational Chart 33 Resumes 34 Subject Matter Expert(s) 34 2.3 Financial Capacity 46 Tab 3 Approach&Methodology 47 Exhibits Exhibit 1.3.1-Miami-Dade County Technical Certifications 10 Exhibit 1.3.2- Required Similar Experience 14 Exhibit 2.1.1-Wade Trim Sea Level Rise Presentations and Publications 17 Exhibit 2.1.2-Successful Grant Awards in Florida 30 Exhibit 2.2.1- Project Manager Information 31 Exhibit 3.1.1-Technical Approach for Water&Wastewater Transmission Systems 48 Exhibit 3.1.2-Technical Approach to Pump Station Design 49 Exhibit 3.1.3-Technical Approach for Sanitary Sewer Master Planning 50 Exhibit 3.1.4-Technical Approach for Water Distribution Master Planning 51 Exhibit 3.1.5-Wade Trim Continuing Engineering Services Experience 53 Exhibit 3.1.6 -Wade Trim Services 57 Exhibit 3.1.7 -Sample Project Schedule 58 2017-129-KB 3 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Mollification Requirements(continued) R:SPONSE CERT1FiC,ATiON, AFFIDAVITr The completed and signed required Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A)can be found below and on the following pages. Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2017-129-KB WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Wad‘.: Trim. Inc. 30 No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: 91 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 50.61 ._tris ,_old cIiiL t.:, Suite 2500 CITY: Detroit STATE: ZIP CODE: :NII N—'2 TELEPHONE NO.: 3 1 3.9 61. 6 0 TOLL FREE NO.: 888.499.9624 FAX NO.: 313.961.089 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 2100 Ponce de Loon Boulevard. Suite 970 CITY: Coral Gablcs STATE: L. ZIP CODE:F33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: LHo1kKroner>. PE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: h krcmcr t mot FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 5')-2417170 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. 2017-129-KB 4 MIAMI BEACH 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES ' NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates Wade e e. J o 1 c` s directors: ora g- `a e o`_t;e_, by Wade Trim,i, o` immediate f'a r..'� members o f ^rte tm e j 1 l y e' }h^ . ... .. .e .. o, t , City i"d ^ Miami iama Beach. J City o Miami ismi Beach pl own�»;n in Wade f�.a._ affiliates. `"7�� interest i.'�..r e�t ��.. {�'i Y 4 ,�'�;� a^# �4 its� , 3. References&Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. Please see Exhibit1,3.2 on pages 14-15 for u I .`' g of relevant cJ m of e led projects detailing on which page reference information is found. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an 'ublic sector agency? YES En NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Wade Trim, Inc. of Florida is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wade Trim Group, Inc. No individual stock- holder in Wade Trim Group, Inc. owns more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the company. No individuals or entities of Wade Trim Group, Inc. have contributed to the campaign, either direct-hi or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request:The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Wade Trim will adopt te City of Miami Eea C Code of Ethics. 2017-129-KB 5 MIAMI BEACH 7. Living Wagc.Pursuant to Section 2 408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as samc may be amended from time to time, Proposers _:...... • - ■ -- - I - • e - • • •- • - '• •. , . .•: / -. a -'• • . • r•• '• • •• 'r• r• •- ' '•• 1 •- -e.. -••-• 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ' YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave V✓ Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 2017-129-KB 6 MIAMI BEACH 9. Public Entity Celine&Sedan 287.1242'M),Florida Staktes,as currently Liladed Or as weeded from thre ki$tve„states tat a peracn or&Gate lithe tas beer placed on the ccmicted muicr list Itilcriving a ocnvicticn for a pubic entity mime may not sutrnit a proposal, pmpcsel, cx r-4ify or a comract to provide any wodsor serifices a public entty-, nay rot sibrril a proposal, ptcposal,or reply on a maxi vith a pubic entity(cc the ocnstrurbon r repot et a public but irg or public wixit.may not submit • pr4iosals,prwosals,or replies on leases of real proper),la a public enity,may nai be awarded or psm work as a conTactrE, supplier,sttiocitractorer corsultait mc'er a ocntracloliti any out:Ac entity;eid riay hot Varzact business wth ary public eMity axCeSS of the Ilvesteld aricunt prokled ir s. 217,O17 rot CATEGORY TWO for a period of 3 months Miming fie date of ben;placed on the convicted vendor hat SUBMITTAL REOUlltedENT:tcadUaiet si.bnillai is required.By virtue of meat%this afidavi document.Proposer agrees %oh the requirements of Section 267,133,Florida Statues,and certifies it has not been placer!or:omitted vender list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pirsuant to City Ordinance No.20 H-3917€J,the City shag rat enter in a=duct vitt a bi.5Tness iniess tie bLsness represents that it does ret a4 MI not engage in,a boycott as deified in Sector'2.315(a)of the City Code,ncludirg blacklistirg„divesting from or oteridse refusing lb deg wit a person Dr entity Alien such action is based on raiz calor, rieinnal otgin,rergicn,sex,iltersetudity,gender identity,seria• marital or fairilia sfaltm,a3e cc SUBMITTAL PIM IREMENT:No additional sthrlitta is requeed.Ey virtue of exetutn;this atidevit locurrient,Prqieser agrees it s and shAl reTain Ii tall ccriplierice th Section 2-375 of die aty celliSami Beach City Core. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuart to Res.biLlon 4177-29375, the city ci Marra eeact, Florida, panitits official Oly travel to the slates of North Ceram and Miss ,4 as'nil as:he ouViase of;pods or services sairce4 in for Carolina and Wili;stssppi Proposer eV agree tat no &am'did cr.tour on behalf cf lFc Cy tAcrth Carolina or kiwis:510,not shell any prcdc or serects it pro-irides to the City be sourced toin these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is naquied.By virtue of exec:it:n-4 this aridoit document.Proposer agrees ills and shall rernah in full car vita Reseldicn 2516-2075. 12_ Fair Chance Requirememt Begtnrlig on Decenter 1.2010.tria Cmoy snag not enter into a ccvitran,rentlirl Punt a annpeiltlue sclicitatibn issimed pursuant jb this article,viiti a busiress unless the business certifies in*ling tat tie business has adoc4ed and rays iikirn policies,prances,aril standards tha are cons:sleirt viifh the city's Far Clance Ordinance.,set!crib In ark*V of chapter 82 of this Ccdo. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No aMitrn.31%iteriz.1 is requied By virtue of executn;this andamt clOcument.Proposer agrees it is and shell rernairi in full cortiokarce with Resoluticn 2015-Z375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum, Mer',i4suance ci sortotation,the City may release one or more adder:4=10 the sclichation which may prvoicie additional irkformation to Proposers or laaer solicitation requireirrerts. The City wil Vivo to reacti every Proposer havirig received selidition throuh to City's eaprxurement system, PalicPurchasexcn. ftwerver, Proposers are solely respond*for assuring they hue received ary aidel addendum'sand postent t solicitation,'This Acknowledgement of Addendum sector certifies',hat tte Prepctser has rweived al a:irdLn released by the City ixursuant to tie solicitation.Faltse to Dolan and adinowled.ie receipt oiai addendJai may result in proposal dis*cpalikaricn. 4-44 Ccifen7iT In rite ki Odin PK*01 44C)il Ad(Send=1 jAddendum 6 1 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 1 Addend=12 A.dderpiksn 3 Addendum 8 Addend=13 .0.4404X9.0041MOVAXMANOW.CMCOMOY Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 .18%..2416054040.4,... kidenthilr 5 Addendum le Addendum 15 ackitIrd confirtnaltn of addendum is required,subrrO under separate=vet 2017429-KB 7 MIAMI BEACH DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 2017-129-KB 8 MIAMI BEACH PROPOSER CE.RTIFICATIOP4 I hereby certify that I, as an ail:hog-cid a,;"et of the Propcser t an $t......-r .'-g tie. tliN intcrrnati:.:•• as my sirri's :roposal; Proper agrees to conp1F21e and uricorcilional acceplarce Cf the terns aid conditions of this docurner, ricitslye of ibis solicilatiort,al atachments,exhibits and appendices and the stents of an Addenda released teret.:., and the OtstiosLre and Disclairier Statement: proposer -atees to ba bound to any arid all specif cations terns artr: corNli,tiors contained in t'i",i-',:, solizitation, arc any ra.,5ed Addenda ard unders-1, nd tat the forlowing are requwerhents o this solcitatio and fa In to zoniply Ivill result in disqualifcation&'.przccsi-4 submitted; Froposer has not divulged, discosald, or contra:vd the proposal wrth other Proposals and has not coded ivith any other proposer or party to arty er proposal; proposer ackrinviieriges that at tnformaficri o,..-otered herer is part of the public domain as defined by 7,-e .Lta., . of For`kt:t,Sunst i-e and R.,blic Records Las ati respcases, data and infcrmation contained in this propcsal, incllusive of the Statement of Qualificztcris Cortfira:ion, Cluestcnnaire ard Requrernents Affidavit are :rue aid aiy...orate. na*of Frapcsie;4,,,,.,---7-i-,A-"-Isazyci 'tact 4nparas s 41trteraati 4aprz,sa rai nig. I I it)I IN K N'llik'N. PE Ikri,cc Proshietit izo;,Rioiinta*, oy 07,41.Ziaidf * P 7 [ —;Ir ir ' jr--- Eitsta of FLOR DA ) Or nis: ittday of ,:\-r i I :14)1 7 persormity ) appeared before mei 0 _v_ ' reiners who Courty cf1.1111,gbaau!',, ) slated that Ifyie is the '.• 1 ..." ..! ,„_,_ f v;',11,:. Tr itm ink— , a oDrperation, and that the instrthmert was signed in behalf of the sad corporation by auti7orny of i1s board of dire:tots and ackrowledged saki 4 r5t7ument.to be its voluntari act and de ; Before me: / .10,1 i 1 liar;F Lilt I k"iCkfr-'1T the s .:-.1, •Fbrr;SE4P-1---u 4 ‘i Ccimmtsion Ecinas: l & "TeGiViCak--7S C.,k, 11/41i-coe..-sfoer- , JESICA)aisnOR SZCZT. ( t ,' i ribur?Puacc'Shrt of Acrito Ccm-ViVices t fiS%cost / M Carr.mit:: len" ha)5 x2. kr ow Niko,Kelm* 2017-129-KB 9 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Personnel Experience REQUIREMENTS All of our professional engineers are licensed with the State of Florida to perform engineering services. Minimum Eligibility Requirements Please see for a copyof each team member's Wade Trim has furnished our qualifications to be professional license. selected by the City of Miami Beach to provide En- gineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Prime Proposer State of Florida Certificate of Projects. Please see below for additional eligibility Authorization requirements. A copy of Wade Trim's Professional Engineering li- cense is included on page 11. On the following page is Proposer Experience a copyof Wade Trim's Corporate Certificate. Wade Trim was established in 1926. During our 91- year p history,we have provided engineering and plan- ping services to many municipalities throughout the Experience Required Similar Please see Exhibit 1.EExpee3.2 on pages 14-15 for a listing of United States and we have been serving Florida clients relevant completed projects detailing on which page since 1984. Wade Trim's local experience and quali- full project descriptions are provided. fications are demonstrated by our technical certifica- tions with Miami-Dade County, shown in Exhibit 1.3.1. Exhibit 1.3.1- Miami-Dade County Technical Certifications Min Summary of Technical Certification Details Business Name: WADE TRIM INC Doing Business FEIN: *****7170 As: Approval Date: 07/06/2016 Technical Certification 07/31/2018 Exp.Date: Section 2. Approved Categories # Code Title 1 1.01 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING-URBAN AREA AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 2 3.01 HIGHWAY.SYSTEMS-SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PARKING LOT DESIGN 3 3.02 HIGHWAY SYSTEMS-MAJOR HIGHWAY DESIGN 4 3.04 HIGHWAY SYSTEMS-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES 5 3.09 HIGHWAY SYSTEMS-SIGNING,PAVEMENT MARKING,AND CHANNELIZATION 6 3.10 HIGHWAY SYSTEMS-LIGHTING WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS-WATER DISTRIBUTION AND SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TRANSMISSION 7 6.01 SYSTEMS 8 6.02 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS-WATER AND SANITARY SEWAGE PUMPING FACILITIES 9 6.03 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS-WATER AND SANITARY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS 10 10.01 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-STORMWATER DRAINAGE DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES 11 11.00 GENERAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 12 13.00 GENERAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 13 16.00 GENERAL CIVIL ENGINEERING 14 17.00 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 15 , 20.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2017-129-KB 10 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attebt. that ade Trim, inc. FBPE iii 4do allthOriZed under the provisions oi Section 471,02,10 Florida St atupia,to offer eogineoririg derViCet to the public through a Professional Rotneer,chüy ticensirci tradcrthapter 471,Florida Statutes. Epiration: 2/2N/2019 CA Lie,No: Audit No: 22/122190490 R 3952 2017-129-KB 11 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) FloridaState of Department of St I certify from the records of this office that WADE TRIM, INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on May 31, 1984, effective June 1, 1984. The document number of this corporation is H05938. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2017, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 25,2017, and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Twenty-fifth day of January, 2017 --'0,--•.--,:,--=!. ..., ./..1411 ;':1, .:-'-',,:7-1-'-; ::s'A';',, ice/-7,--4:__, 1-7.--,--k 7:;,...-10 ***\ ':„.n, ',1-' .-".....r.- :4----'14; 16.N 0*, '.1,k f , .,,-- : ". = -17, • '"41.''-'t? -''. Secretary of,State -...f.fiii.iiiit ...-- Tracking Number:CC9901729906 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 2017-129-KB 12 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) Wade Trim Key Personnel Licenses State of Flof Fl Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Attests that Thomas Scott Brzezinski,P.E. Daniel George Burden,P.E.FI311- ". Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28!2019 P.E.Lit,.No: Expiration:2128/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 225201930')2.1 r -° Audit No: 2282019005.39 R 53737 State of Fl State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Attests that Holli Patricia Kremers,P.E. *1/4Natalie A.Shaper,P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 Is licensed as a Professional 13ngirtee►under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes p P.E.Lic.No: 2:,2 2214 P.E. No: Audit No: 220201920778 R 68130 22s22t4t12.1 State of Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Daniel I.Garcia,P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201908117 State of Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Aleem Abdool Ghany,P.E. PE Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration: /28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201906589 R 55408 State of Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Ricardo G.Borromeo,P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201917403 R 2017-129-KB 13 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) Exhibit 1.3.2 lists our qualifying project experience. Full project profiles for select projects are provided at the page number indicated. Exhibit 1.3.2-Required Similar Experience YEAR OF PROJECT NAME OWNER COMPLETION SCOPE PAGE Marriott Lift Station and City of Marathon 2015 Wastewater lift station and force Service Area 3 Force main design, reviewed existing Main system collection challenges North Port Water City of North 2015 Site condition assessment, water Master Plan Port Utilities distribution model, wastewater Department collection model Islamorada Wastewater Islamorada, 2016 Design Criteria Package development, 26 Collection &Treatment Village of Islands identification of long-term system System needs, long-term system O&M requirements Palm Bay Wastewater City of Palm Bay 2008 Hydraulic modeling using SWMM, 28 Master Plan & Hydraulic future system capacity verification, Modeling identification of CIP projects Palm Bay Water System City of Palm Bay 2012 Hydraulic modeling using 23 Hydraulic Model Update WaterGEMS, future system capacity verification, identification of CIP projects Palm Bay Lift Station City of Palm Bay 2006 Equipment condition assessment, Condition Assessment operation and maintenance improvements, pump station rehabilitation, CMMS maintenance program Seven Springs Florida 2014 Construction of a ground storage Reclaimed System Governmental tank, interconnection with Improvements Utility Authority neighboring Pasco County reclaimed system and extension of the reclaimed distribution system Seven Springs Water Florida 2011 Installation of 8-inch and 12- 22 System Improvements Governmental inch water main using horizontal Utility Authority directional drill and open-cut methods Waterway Estates Force Florida 2013 Wastewater collection infrastructure Main Governmental expansion Utility Authority FGUA Aqua Utility Florida 2014 Facility assessment for 70 small utility Acquisition Governmental systems throughout Florida Utility Authority FGUA Capital Florida 2009 Developed CIP for newly acquired Improvement Program Governmental Seven Springs water and wastewater (CIP) Utility Authority system 2017-129-KB 14 MIAMI BEACH Minimum Qualifications Requirements(continued) Exhibit 1.3.2- Required Similar Experience YEAR OF PROJECT NAME OWNER COMPLETION SCOPE PAGE Sunset Harbour City of Miami 2016 Design of stormwater collection Neighborhood Beach and pumping system,water Improvements main replacement, streetscape improvements to address sea level rise Palm & Hibiscus City of Miami 2017 Drainage, utility, and roadway Islands Neighborhood Beach improvements to address sea Improvements level rise; new water main; relocated water services; utility undergrounding Espanola Way City of Miami 2017 Water main and sanitary sewer Improvements Beach drainage replacement, and streetscape improvements Indian River Drive Water City of 2013 Water system improvements Main Replacement Cocoa Utility Department H/�5'///�4KB�dkNtaf%QG//%'4 (Qb/.s#/q.Wi//�'6'• u,,. .,,rr/N 2017-129-KB 15 MIAMI BEACH ri S:, M , ,„ :7---...!...,,... .'..,-,,,, ..1,,''. ""., if t:. ' -:1-,,,,,,,...7,1,,, • fY^ Y•w�� r t }' • Nal aa � A, y6 ?"�^h '^^,•a' :. ... ' D► ^ S •' � . tt � . v. -- , f 1 M{T- ,'.4.Y' ^ "" _ • . K . si Ni ,,,,,,,,..:»4:::,,.:',...,,4,' ld,A i a w`� ..w„ ........ .. • ; ;r:rwaSS�S.S ___:„....::::—.77.:::::177....4,..7..."1 zx IIII1 • 1 ,• t1'1{ r- `1 1 Z { i FE • . • . . « • is ' * ',,,.',,: I 'a m I, . F 1y ., s * r" .,�w °w4<a . "y`"_stir4 ".v,;• `,. r`,.N :. •= „ w oil, . ,, . nY , " AM ,,,,i;:72,::,,,,,,,,„. .w,; a rorxxg, Frf zw a yaQ2'n,°!ti•'4h°»w viu r�,"',�a'�A`x�af✓�r �S .« .,M , W: m,.. agar .•. ^ ro ,r mw,naw. ,•.,r.Y"':::,..• ,nam.- ,iK.gLYenlw .�•m!^^'.y e , m ,M a _ M' e,. • 18004.,' ei .,!,'....rT • -- A n`e, .;4.,'.''.',•,:,'' Y7.'''4,,',4, ,4,,� ;',:i ' ,7;9 ';',,,%,;,/' a/k(�S -,. � nM, r "/r.�aoa µ�gN „„� . ' ¢ad nyl�,y. `::. ...... .,.'.: '_...,. .. r "• ^q0a'”>7 xr �'w r a Rwa«ayH P'S4 kj��'ml�y�`;� i. r !,� y .. n�u"wr v.,9�x�ii, ���,���2�, ry ✓���x�a�a P :z�4 a �'R e A • "w y rr r..4+ « EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS ---- ,,;.,,„.,,,,,,., , .,,.,.,,,, ,-'..*„.,. -,..„ :.,,„,, ,,, .,., ,..,...,,,,,,, _,a 111111,1 IIIA.,,, .,.„.,......i, E .ft' ,.,,...,,..__,..j,, ,.l....t.1,.,1,, .-- - , ,.., �,,. '�A.�1, i.^x .r _.. �.. .,...... +,.:..+..w..+.W+••.,.+r••aw....•.�..•r,..••.. ,.v..w.....w.r.wraMl ,,e Ji" y--, ColOf CO Legend �` „, -c F F 7 *�4 i'., ' ,0,4 Junction Fire Flow(Available)igpm) i mo•,- x Coding eg 11 F - - .: i,.. ,, + n____ ..f : . - .-::,,,-.„..,,, .. A iw. 4;,' , t__ter ti's'. ,,, ;-.ik( . .,� ,. �:�, jc ,'w r y�9t f ,, ^''tae - x - `y T. ..., ; , ��,�. „•: �� ; <= 500 ,7______., _. _ -- :.: .„,:,,,,, ,,._. t , .,.',..- 1,!-T.'kk--:-'11:fr41 - ,---- , -,?‘ „. ki_ '''':;11:!k. <_ ,, \ , )_ ,, dt.„,„7„.., i �y try t .1 *ia ,7 i''',2'..., V''''',,, (1....._.<24:(1 ,., • <= 2.000 t i / v irom l'' t -7: <- 2.5004.4/ __-e- .4 , ,,::, „„,..2.:*„._ �f. ...,,,,,,,,?,,,,!*,; • Other ,J , ; _______ . .----.'1 ,',.-,q,' .. - „ ''',...........i,'„,g-4.,,-. 01-,-. „„,..,,... ______P Jt !. . .,. .LJ • ,.w : - b6 A �"^e m • N,�\-. -. a . •'1. . ,.til j.+�'.]tY:. :. Y J M. "C. . r naiu , r Nearly 90%of our business is from repeat clients, a Tab 2 testament to our commitment to client relationships. F !zJ(� , t- -Yr : . .3,.......c-F; ,--rgicr Our belief in strong relationships is reflected in our - — -` ''cor orate vision statement, "BuildingRelationships on " , �...:,,��.. - a . ..y�-- `: ,y, - w.i a Foundation of Excellence."We strive to become our x Pz `,1- clients'trusted advisor and to develop solutions they ,.. ,_-_ ,, id ,.- p x.. ... can stand behind. a.... a�.; *war.... . Z x.4 sr ' 4 ... — - In 1984, Wade Trim opened our first Florida office. EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS Since then,we have become recognized as one of Florida's most experienced engineering and design 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM firms. Our Florida staff is located throughout the state in Miami, Palm Bay, and Tampa offices.Staff in our Firm History Miami office will take the lead in workingwith the Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida consulting engineering firm helping local and regional govern- City, allowing us to be responsive to the City's project needs. ments create livable,sustainable communities through practical and innovative solutions.Wade Trim's staff Firm Experienceerience has a history of solving a multitude of utility challen - Wade Trim's 91-year existence in the engineering es while always focusing on the environment and the communityprovides us with a wealth of knowledge improvement of our clients' infrastructure. g dealing with numerous projects. Our experience includes water and wastewater collection distribu- In 1926,we started completing municipal utility tion planningand design as well as site development, designs.As work grew in response to changing client g P stormwater control,traffic engineering, electrical, needs, our staff and offices expanded through new parking lot design, drive access, roadway design, per- client growth. Today,Wade Trim employs more than mitfin ,water and wastewater treatment, reclaimed 400 people in 19 offices in Florida, Illinois, Michi- g water distribution, utility design and relocation, pipe- gan, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, lines, storage tanks,and pumping. Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Our expertise has grown to provide a full range of professional services Over theears, our firm has completed a significant to meet the infrastructure needs of governmental, theyears, g number of projects that include the services request- commercial, and industrial clients. We have evolved ed under thisrocurement.The combined expertise P P to become a full-service firm of engineers, planners, of developing these services and applying them to scientists, surveyors, landscape architects, and sup- projects, included in our project profiles,gives the City port staff who solve a multitude of environmental and a professional engineering services firm that can deliv- infrastructure problems. We have extensive expert- era broad range of projects under this procurement. ence evaluating, designing,and rehabilitating infra- structure g systems.Along with our clients,we have Climate Change and Sea Level Rise been recognized with numerous professional design g For years,Wade Trim has supported the City's corn- awards including a national award from the American mitment to engaging the public and other stakehold- Consulting Engineers Council. ers through proper education of its ongoing plans and strategies to address effects of climate change and Wade Trim is consistently ranked in the top design and sea level rise. Fromresentations for Miami Beach environmental firms and continues to be nationally rec- p residents to co-authoring articles for professional ognized for innovative solutions.Wade Trim was recent- technicalublications,the Cityand Wade Trim have ly ranked 229th in Engineering News Record's ranking p collaborated to face the challenge of sea level rise and of the nation's Top 500 design firms as well as 136th for developsolutions to build more resilient infrastruc- environmental firms.Trenchless Technology ranks us ture in the City's neighborhoods. 24th on their list of Top 50 Trenchless Design Firms. 2017-129-KB 16 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) Wade Trim has participated at several events and published articles regarding the issue of resiliency, many of which are described in Exhibit 2 Exhibit 2.1.1-Wade Trim Sea Level Rise Presentations and Publications DATE OF EVENT TITLE DESCRIPTION VENUE OR PUBLICATION Miami Beach Takes a Presentation with 2017 Sustainable Water Management March 2017 Stand on the Edge of a Bruce Mowry Conference Rising Sea New Orleans, LA Creating Resilient Utility Presentation Water Infrastructure Conference March 2017 Systems Flint, MI Miami Beach Takes a Technical Florida Water Resources Journal September 2016 Stand on the Edge of a publication, co- Rising Sea authored with Bruce Mowry Miami Beach Takes a Presentation Florida Water Resource Conference April 2016 Stand on the Edge of a Orlando, Florida Rising Sea Combating Rising Tides Technical ASHE Scanner January 2016 in Miami Beach publication Miami Beach Takes a Technical JOURNAL Florida Engineering Society January 2015 Stand on the Edge of a publication, co- Rising Seas authored with Bruce Mowry a>a'/ A(Wa/a�✓/R9wY/Y1Y %/d96aaaaaaagaiw,Sffia..n... .. //...:,,..,.; :i„i•..,,,,•�R!N/ 'AdNE4wri,8a'i/a.1w, :.:.:.,., .. ..,, .... _. _. Wade Trim has given presentations at several of the We understand that the City is interested in part- Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Flood Mitigation and nering with most innovative and solutions-oriented participated in numerous Community Design Review engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Meetings to discuss resiliency measures at various Miami Beach Rising Above. Wade Trim is proud to say locations throughout the City. that many of the innovative tools used by the City in its neighborhoods were developed via collaborative In addition, Wade Trim has been co-organizer of efforts between Miami Beach, Wade Trim staff, and events with Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Depart- partnering construction companies. ment's efforts to increase resiliency of its water and wastewater infrastructure.The Resilient Utility Coa- lition (RUC) Visioning Workshop held at the PORTMI- AMI on August 18th, 2016 brought local and national • Flooding Solutions industry and policy experts to brainstorm on solutions #MBRisingAbove to challenges faced by MDWASD and South Florida municipalities. Wade Trim is a founding sponsor of e MIAMI BEACH the RUC and continues to actively participate in the M - y organization. /. = � " ' MBRisingAbov �,� • e.com • 2017-129-KB 17 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) The successes of Wade Trim in its projects at Miami and infrastructure at increased risk of flooding Beach has put the national spotlight on the City's and tidal inundation with increases in sea level, to efforts and branded Miami Beach as an innovator be used as a basis for identifying and prioritizing in leading engineering efforts to combat effects of adaptation needs and strategies. Climate Change.Talk media like National Public Radio • Incorporate and prioritize preferred climate and printed media like the New Yorker are just some adaptation improvement projects in capital of the examples of the exposure that the City has had improvement plans and pursue funding. at a national level in the recent years. The lessons learned from the last five years of RCAP 1 Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change implementation will be rolled into an updated version Compact of the Plan in 2017,to be called RCAP 2.0.Teams of The Regional Climate � topic experts will review the existing 110 recommen- Change Compact was noluosALamma dations and provide their input on improvements adopted in January 2010 CLIMATEz to RCAP 1. Recommendations bythese experts will p byBroward, Mimi- HANGEa Dade, be posted to the Compact website for stakeholder Monroe,and Palm Beach review. Wade Trim will continue to work collaborative- Counties. Recognizing the vulnerabilities of these ly with Miami Beach staff in developing strategies to counties to climate change, a Regional Climate Change ensure successful resiliency tools are adopted at the Action Plan (RCAP 1)was developed. Completed in Oc- project level and acknowledged in RCAP 2.0 for other tober 2012, RCAP 1 contains mitigation and adaptation municipalities to benefit. strategies to cope with the threat of climate change, such as joint policies to influence climate/energy legis- Water and Wastewater Transmission and lation and strategies to attract state and federal fund- Distribution Systems ing.Since 2012, RCAP 1 has served as a critical tool in In Florida today, projected demands and system ensuring that municipalities and counties of Southeast deficiencies are driving the need for improvements Florida speak with a common voice when addressing to address future capacity needs. On the water climate change challenges. side,storage and high-service pumping is needed to provide for things such as fire protection and Flori- Examples of recommendations provided in the RCAP da Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regarding water supply, management, and infrastruc- regulations. Due to the age of selected areas within ture include: the service area,various transmission and distribution • Develop local and,where appropriate, regional system improvements are needed to increase system inventories of existing potable water supply reliability, available pressure,and flows. On the waste- delivery and collection systems,vulnerable water side,the municipalities are positioning strongly wellfields,wastewater collection and/or treatment to meet the wastewater collection and transmission infrastructure,septic tanks/drainfields, and system needs of the future. However, emphasis is stormwater drainage and treatment facilities; needed on infrastructure renewal and upgrading assess the potential impact from climate change with some consideration to a limited number of key of each component; and develop different climate planned development projects. change scenarios and adaptation strategies for high-risk utilities and/or infrastructure which may Pumping Systems require replacement, reinforcement, or relocation Growing capacity requirements and age of equipment to ensure the long-term viability of the system are challenges facing many communities in the area. (e.g., modified site, depth, elevation, materials, or Future growth of the City's water and sewer systems connection requirements). will be instrumental in keeping the City the provider • Utilize existing and refined inundation maps and it is today toward its visitors and citizens. Wade Trim stormwater management models to identify areas understands how a collection and distribution system 2017-129-KB 18 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) can be impacted by capacity requirements. In terms of maintained throughout construction while adequate pump stations, upgrading and expanding pumping sys- staging and storage areas are available for the con- tems are frequently required. First, it is important to tractor. Secondly, we will encourage advanced utility determine what needs to be done to the system and relocations whenever possible. If some utilities can how best to resolve the issues in the most cost-effec- be completed before others, more space will become tive way. Wade Trim has completed a similar project available for the other contractors. Finally, we will for the City of Palm Bay where we provided a condi- "clear the path" and resolve utility conflicts before tion assessment of 100 pump stations throughout the construction so that contractor progress is not imped- City and recommended improvements to deal with ed. We have found that many utility agencies attempt City growth.The project identified several options to to resolve their conflicts among each other, but there improve and upgrade their system at low costs. is no single clearing house to ensure conflicts are resolved. Wade Trim has initiated conflict resolution Electrical Services matrices on our plans that identify each conflict, led Wade Trim provides full-service electrical, instrumen- the discussions to resolve each conflict between utility tation and control (I&C), and SCADA services ranging agencies, and documented that resolution in the from feasibility studies to designing, installing, calibrat- drawings and on a summary matrix continued with- ing, and operating complex, computerized instrumen- in the bid set.This three-step approach, led by our tation of water resources systems. In fact, Wade Trim is proactive field staff keeps projects moving forward to licensed as an electrical contractor in some locations, a timely completion. providing construction, start-up, and follow-up ser- vices.These capabilities help meet the time-sensitive Local Permitting and Regulatory Agencies needs of sophisticated I&C systems. Staff can design, During the completion of projects, Wade Trim worked install, and provide support for system integration, closely with permitting agencies and met the local, man/machine interfacing, and I&C systems. state, and federal maintenance of traffic requirements as applicable.Although our experience extends be- Engineering Support During Construction and yond what is mentioned, the following highlights our Maintenance of Traffic experience with some of the key regulatory agencies Wade Trim understands that utility projects often are and neighboring communities frequently interacted performed in a confined construction environment. with during the implementation of City projects. That is, the work needs to be completed within a short period of time and within a limited space.The Florida Department of Environmental most prevalent issue that can slow construction is Protection (FDEP) encountering unanticipated conflicts between utilities =44* Our working relationship with FDEP comes or roadway components. Encountering unexpected ER.c.4.‘ from years of permitting experience with utilities typically increases project costs and extends this state agency. Our engineers work schedule.Time is of the essence on these project closely with FDEP's offices, successfully securing types and while working in a limited space (generally scores of permits for our municipal clients over the the right-of-way)with limited room for staging equip- past 33 years working in the state of Florida. Wade ment and materials, a proactive, responsive team with Trim was also selected as one of FDEP's preferred first-hand knowledge of the design must be available Consultants for projects throughout the State through and knowledgeable in keeping the project moving FDEP's main office in Tallahassee. during construction. South Florida Water Management District Our approach to deal with a confined construction (SFWMD) environment includes three steps. First, a well-coor- `�""' Our working relationship with SFWMD dinated maintenance of service plan will be devel- o spans several years.There are few mu- oped. This plan ensures road and utility service can be � . y nicipal engineering projects that do not 2017-129-KB 19 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) require some form of SFWMD approval, most often any projects where trees may be impacted, and the an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP). We strive transportation department for projects where street to secure permit exemptions for our clients wherever and pavement signage or signals may be impacted. possible. Our engineers enjoy strong working relation- We have developed a relationship with these agencies ships with the review staff in the West Palm Beach over the last several years, and work with the City to office, which enables us to quickly schedule meetings navigate the process efficiently. when needed or obtain prompt feedback or assis- tance. Wade Trim Relevant Experience and Proven Track Record with Similar Projects Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Wade Trim prides itself on delivering innovative Wade Trim has been pre-qualified with high-quality projects.These projects include not only v = z FDOT for the past 33 years.This long-term , the quality of the product, but that it is delivered e professional working relationship includes responsively, within budget, and within theJ ro'ect p designing and permitting roads, bridges, schedule.This includes the delivery of both profes- stormwater facilities, etc.,and has enabled us to more sional services and the commensurate construction effectively serve our municipal clients due to our famil- services and budgets.The following pages highlight iarity with FDOT's design standards and procedures, our experience on similar projects and illustrate a and with most of the Department Heads. Without number of collection, distribution,treatment,trans- these relationships, it is difficult and time-consuming mission, and lift stations projects for which Wade Trim to effectively work through this large bureaucracy. has provided architectural and engineering services, general engineering studies and acquisition services, Miami-Dade County construction services, construction scheduling,value MIAMMDiADE Many areas of Miami Beach fall within analysis,training, mapping, and surveying services EMI Miami-Dade Countyjurisdiction. Several to our clients.The following g pages provide the five County roads traverse the City, and the Miami-Dade requested representative projects. We encourage you Department of Transportation and Public Works per- to contact our client references to verify their satisfac- mits utility work in these roads. In addition,the City's tion with the long-term professional services we have water and wastewater supply/treatment is provided been providing. by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, which means that all plans and permit applications have to be reviewed by the County as well as the City. Wade Trim understands this process and has been successful in efficient navigation of permit approval through the appropriate parties recently on the Sunset Harbour, Espanola Way, and Palm & Hibiscus Islands projects. City of Miami Beach MIAMI BEACh Wade Trim has successfully designed and permitted three water and wastewater utility improvement projects in the City of Miami Beach over the past three years. The City's Public Works Department (PWD) approves and permits all work within the right-of-way.The PWD coordinates with other City agencies having inter- est in the project including the fire department for water system improvement projects,greenspace for 2017-129-KB 20 MIAMI BEACH .. . r FIRM NAME/ ROLE: s �� .,�� :T t Wade Trim/Lead Designer PROPOSED TEASti— MEMBERS * - :. Holly Kremers, PE a mss t w„p t z . Tom Brzezinski, PE y�"° ro k :Arz Ricardo Borromeo PE H '' iwe � Alan Schwab, PE --- Carey Wright, PE a f a Dave McKone o CLIENT CONTACT: City of Miami Beach Bruce Mowry 1700 Convention Center Drive PALM & HIBISCUS ISLANDS NEIGHBORHOOD Miami Beach, FL 33139 IMPROVEMENTS 305.673.7071 brucemowry@miamibeachfl.gov MIAMI BEACH, FL ry g START DATE: 2015 Wade Trim and Lanzo Construction formed a Design-Build team for COMPLETION DATE: 2017 the Palm and Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Improvements project TOTAL FEE: $794,080 in the City of Miami Beach.The scope of the neighborhood improve- ments includes response to sea level rise effects at Miami Beach by raising and reconstructing the roadways, constructing a new drainage system with pumped outfalls, new water main installation, relocation of water services, utility undergrounding, and roadway lighting and streetscape improvements.The stormwater drainage system requires design and installation of three new pump stations with outfalls to Biscayne Bay. The water distribution system improvements includes new 8-inch ductile iron water main throughout both of the islands.The water mains will be installed along the public streets, and will include new fire hydrant assemblies,tie-ins to the existing water mains, and ser- vice connections at each parcel. Approximately 10,500 lineal feet of new water mains will be installed on Hibiscus Island, and 7,000 lineal feet on Palm Island. The project requires fast-track construction to minimize impact to the residents of the Islands.The roadways are generally narrow, and the improvements will require temporary complete road closure and reconstruction.The project staging needs to occur such that access is maintained to all properties during construction. 'at ( .1% • Flooding Solutions 'MBRisingAbove iV\A iI BEACH : • MBRisingAbove,com w 2017-129-KB 21 MIAMI BEACH FIRM NAME/ ROLE .ryM .. . Wade Trim/Lead Designer PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS: Holly Kremers, PE � ' °� , a a A v Tom Brzezinski, PE .. y Carey Wright, PE .max Dave McKone CLIENT CONTA T: ��� -, �� � a� "`r Florida Governmental Utility Authority ;. ,,� s4 Robert Sheets, System Manager 280 Wekiva Springs Road, FGUA SEVEN SPRINGS WATER SYSTEM Suite 2000 IMPROVEMENTS Longwood, FL 32779 407.629.6900 PASCO COUNTY, FL rsheets@govmserv.com The Seven Springs Water Service District in Pasco County was ex- START DATE: 2010 periencing three critical issues in its water system: overum in of p p g COMPLETION DATE: 2011 source water due to limited capacity; poor quality of effluent causing corrosion, odor, and black water; and system pressure issues.The TOTAL FEE: $943,000 Florida Governmental Utility Authority(FGUA) purchased the private- ly-owned system in 2009, and retained Wade Trim to resolve these issues using short-term and long-term solutions. A corrosion control study was conducted to reduce corrosion of copper service lines. In addition, a hydraulic model was developed to identify areas of stagnant water to implement small looping projects. The long-term solution of constructing a centralized treatment facility meant the existing small plants needed to be converted to water wells, and nearly 7 miles of new water mains were constructed to de- liver water to the new treatment facility.The challenge in water main construction was the addition of a new utility to the right-of-way of a heavy commercial corridor with many existing utilities. Approximately 8,400 LF of 8-inch, and approximately 28,560 LF of 12-inch water main was installed with a combination of horizontal directional drill and open-cut methods. Relocation of shallow buried utilities was required in several instances to allow the water main to be constructed in the only available space within the right-of-way. Safe separation distance between the water main and other utilities was maintained throughout the route. The raw water main was installed with a combination of horizontal directional drill and open-cut methods. Relocation of shallow buried utilities was required in several instances to allow the raw water main to be constructed in the only available space within the right-of-way. Safe separation distance between the raw water main and other utili- ties was maintained throughout the route. 2017-129-KB 22 MIAMI BEACH FIRM NAME l ROLE: Wade Trim/ Lead Designer x PROPOSED TEA ,,1114 MEMBERS Holly Kre m e rs, PE ' „",� Tom Brzezinski, PE pimoss, Dan Burden, PhD, PE s CLIENT NTACT: .+} City of Palm Bay Eddie F n � .,,� � � ¢; .M o tanin, PE, Utilities Director 250 Osmosis Drive Palm Bay, FL 32909 321.952.3410 PALM BAY WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL fontanine@palmbayflorida.org UPDATE START DATE: 2012 PALM BAY, FL COMPLETION DATE: 2012 In 2006, Wade Trim prepared the water master plan for the City of TOTAL FEE: $75,000 Palm Bay to develop a hydraulic model to be used as a tool in sizing or verifying designs affecting their water system,and to develop CIPs for the 5-, 10-and 15-year projections related to their water system. In 2012,the City requested Wade Trim to update the water system hydraulic model and to work in conjunction with the City's staff to develop an updated water CIPs. Using the hydraulic software Water- GEMS for the hydraulic model, it is tied in with GIS as the backbone in the model development. Using WaterGEMS enables the City to tie the model and CIPs into the City's GIS system to consolidate this informa- tion all under one location. Working with the City's Planning Department, future projections were used to better illustrate the current and anticipated future devel- opment and needs for water service.Taking this information along with treatment plant flow records and field pressure data, a baseline hydraulic model was developed. Once the Water Master Plan was approved by the City Council, it provided an approved document to use as a resource of the City's existing system and reasoning for each of the Capital Improvement Projects recommended. This information allowed the City to budget according to the priorities stated in the Water Master Plan. 2017-129-KB 23 MIAMI BEACH fw: FIRM NAME!ROLE: i As M , Vilp Wade Trim/Lead Designer M., r A. . ,PROPOSED TEAs, , - ' clic _ ,. MEMBERS: ' Holly Kremers, PE Tom Brzezinski, PE =--_, Alan Schwab, PE i , .,,,, P' , .4 Dave McKone :'.. 1 meiCLIENT CONTACT: i. 11-.-'-- -: , - 1% L‘:,..„ 3,- - i ________ , ~ �'' 'Florida Governmental Utility -.. — ,, , Authority r oak sh."...., ...... Robert Sheets, System ,w'" Manager 280 Wekiva Springs Road, FGUA WATERWAY ESTATES FORCE MAIN Suite 2000 NORTH FORT MYERS, FL Longwood, FL 32779 407.629.6900 rsheets@govmserv.com To eliminate treated wastewater effluent from being discharged to START DATE: 2011 the Caloosahatchee River, flows from the existing Waterway Estates Wastewater Treatment Facility required diversion to a neighboring COMPLETION DATE: 2013 wastewater facility. At the time,flows were pumped generally south TOTAL FEE: $100,800 in Fort Myers, where the Waterway Estates WWTP was located.The closest available facility to receive diverted flow from Waterway Estates was the Del Prado WWTP, but it was located well north of the Waterway Estates WWTP. Wade Trim assisted the Florida Governmental Authority(FGUA) in expanding its wastewater collection infrastructure by 1 million gallons per day to collect flows from the Waterway Estates service area locat- ed in Fort Myers.This expansion included installation of approximate- ly 8 miles of force main and construction of an intermediate pump station to send flows from the Waterway Estates WWTP, soon to be decommissioned, to the newly expanded Del Prado WWTP located in North Fort Myers. Wade Trim was responsible for the preparation of the Design Criteria Package (DCP) and construction engineering services, start-up, and project close-out. The project was completed on schedule and within budget. ' ''''' ;,:i.„4'.!..,„„:, ' , '' '.',.' ---,1,. , , 7;filillith .,q , ,.4,.. ., : xaii,�e*�s —. .......,- a i, 1 F. . li.A,.' . i f.. 2017-129-KB 24 MIAMI BEACH ummommommommis FIRM NAME I ROLE: Wade Trim/Lead Designer . . • PROPOSED TEA jllhllfSr: MEMBERS: ° ;Tom Brzezinski, PE ` '� ,,Holly Kremers, PE , Dan Burden, PhD, PE if - CLIENT CONTAC ': City of North Port Utilities rtri s!? -:�- .. • ; 1144311. rt *1/4 • Department 4 � , A I► •. J •1 y.thik•+ .Igr • 140 • Rick Newkirk, Utilities Director North Port Utilities 4970 City Hall Blvd North Port, FL 34286 NORTH PORT WATER MASTER PLAN 941.429.7000 NORTH PORT FL rnewkirk@cityofnorthport.com START DATE: 2014 The City of North Port Utilities Department oversees the operation COMPLETION DATE: 2015 of two water treatment plants, one reuse facility, 100 lift stations, TOTAL FEE: and a distribution and collection system to service more than 35,000 $46,300 customer accounts.The Department completed a number of projects established at the time of need or on anticipated future demand. In an effort to update the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) over the next 5 years,the Department sought the assistance of an engineering firm that could assess the existing facilities, projects completed, and future demand to establish if any adjustments to the current CIP were needed to meet current and future demands. The City contracted Wade Trim in an effort to review the overall util- ities from an asset to reviewing current CIPs and comparing them to what the current and future service needs were for the City. In doing so,Wade Trim programmed a systematic approach in which several aspects were reviewed: condition assessments, hydraulic modeling, and review of currently programmed CIPs. Wade Trim met with the Department engineering and field staff to discuss preferences and what in their system they would like corrected. Wade Trim prepared a water and wastewater hydraulic model based on current and anticipated flows.This model was used as a means of reviewing the current CIP and established need based on revised conditions. Upon completion of the assessment and hydraulic model, Wade Trim reviewed the current CIPs and either removed those deemed un- necessary due to an update in projected flows, or added projects to accomplish the needs as provided by feedback in meeting with staff. 2017-129-KB 25 MIAMI BEACH y� y�Y�'°"a .:1� �rc.a'A� � aptt�nw k. ,,.4... �-,�M"yz'. � 'm y ��� '..a t �,^ Agin x q, +^3p `ab 'R`?� ,"Md" .N^'�.�'."'°'r,a�"•'a" "' r FIRM NAME I ROLE: .,,� � _ ' x x Y Wade Trim Design-Build �:. .. ,� ti ," Criteria Consultant Own- �. �: .�• :.. :yo w..�� fib•' .':Ar� Ay,. er's Representative, Design Y ?1W"� •+L y / / Manager, and Construction ,. a'- w+ Manager 74* ���, A PROPOSED TEAM � . c 1. MEMBERS: "It .40 Tom Brzezinski, PE ._ 4 ,40; x *: x;".4i4 141:+h,t, r Holly Kremers, PE a : a . ` ., Dan Burden, PhD, PE Dave Mullen EI �: x �i ,-.. •+..Y",......,✓ � Kms,;.. . CLIENT CONTACT: ISLAMORADA WASTEWATER COLLECTION & Islamorada, Village of Islands TREATMENT SYSTEM Greg Ti n d l e, Wastewater Pro ram Mana er ISLAMORADA, VILLAGE OF ISLANDS, FL g g 98880 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 Islamorada, Village of Islands, used a design-build-operate (DBO) 305.664.6451 delivery model to construct a $130 million centralized wastewater greg.tindle@islamorada.fl.us collection and treatment system in response to Florida-mandated Ad- START DATE: 2011 vanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) requirements intended to pro- tect coastal waters. Relying solely on septic systems for their waste- COMPLETION DATE: 2016 water, Islamorada was required to construct a wastewater collection, TOTAL FEE: $9,600,000 transmission, and treatment system to eliminate septic tanks within the four-island community. Wade Trim was hired as the Village's Own- er's Representative and Project Manager for the wastewater program to perform the duties of Design-Build Criteria Consultant, Design Manager, and Construction Manager, as well as provide procurement assistance and O&M oversight during the five-year program. A Village-wide vacuum sanitary sewer/force main hybrid wastewater collection system was ultimately constructed that included more than 80 miles of varying diameter sewer force main, four requisite vacuum pump stations,transmission force mains, and transfer pump facilities. In lieu of constructing multiple wastewater treatment facilities in the Village, Wade Trim assisted Islamorada with negotiating an interlo- cal agreement with a neighboring community to pump the system's wastewater approximately 15 miles for treatment to their wastewa- ter treatment plant.The project also included more than 40 miles of roadway reconstruction and 41,000 feet of water main upgrades. Project definition and procurement support services were provid- ed, including contract development and negotiations to meet the state-mandated timeline. Wade Trim developed a Design Criteria Package (DCP)outlining and detailing the guidelines to be followed by the selected DBO firm in the project delivery. Project standards were created for the system's process and SCADA equipment and all instal- lation procedures. A master schedule was prepared with milestones and tasks required to procure and manage the DBO Contractor as well as to obtain funding and financing. An RFQ process was used to short- list firms, followed by an RFP process.Wade Trim helped develop the 2017-129-KB 26 MIAMI BEACH ISLAMORADA WASTEWATER COLLECTION & TREATMENT SYSTEM ISLAM RADA, VILLAGE OF ISLANDS FL (Cont'd) RFQ/RFP documents and procurement processes, and chaired the selection committees consisting of representatives from Monroe County, the Village's rate and financial consultants, and a Village resident. Concurrently with the development of project definition and procurement, Wade Trim self-performed the design of the Middle Plantation Key Collection System, a northern component of the Village's overall program.The design was used as a pilot to set the design standard for the DBO proposers as well as to provide a shovel-ready design for the successful DBO Contractor to begin construction services upon No- tice to Proceed (NTP).Timely delivery of the project was important as the Village's team was petitioning the State and ACOE for grant funding based on successful project delivery. Once the DBO Contractor was selected, design review and coordination services were used to ensure project definition goals were met. Wade Trim reviewed design documents at 60%,90%, and 100% delivery dates for compliance with the DCP and owner preferences. Maintaining the DCP's standards eliminated the need for unnecessary change orders. With design details driven by the design-build team and compliance reviews performed by the Owner's Representative, designs moved forward in a timely manner. Value engineering services performed by Wade Trim identified $380,000 in cost-saving alterna- tives to the original designs, which were split between the Village and DBO Contractor. Wade Trim also monitored permitting submittals and ensured permits were applied for, RFIs responded to, and approvals received in a timely manner to keep the project on schedule. Construction management, inspection, project controls, and start-up oversight assisted the Village staff in confirming a high-quality installation was provided by the DBO Contractor. Wade Trim provided full- time, on-site inspection including a Construction Manager, Document Control Administrator, Schedule/ Permitting Specialist, and a team of inspectors. All inspectors maintained daily logs of quantities installed while ensuring the built work was constructed in accordance with the DCP. Weekly progress meetings were attended by the Owner's Representative, DBO Contractor, and Village to discuss project progress and outstanding issues requiring resolution. Coordination efforts with regulatory agencies such as FDOT, FDEP, KLWTD, USACOE, and the Village were also discussed. Community outreach meetings were held throughout the Village with local businesses and residents to convey project details and to inform the community of the project. Wade Trim's con- struction team witnessed system testing and ensured compliance prior to areas being accepted for start- up. Installed quantities were compared against billed quantities to ensure billings represented installed work. Grant and state funding requirements were reviewed to ensure all compliance issues were met prior to recommending payment by the Village to the DBO Contractor. As areas of the new wastewater collection and transmission system were coming available for connec- tion, Wade Trim and the Village developed a program to connect local residents to the Village's system. The program included preparing blanket easements to access and construct lateral sewer connections on private properties connecting homes and businesses to the system. Blanket easements were used to pro- vide access during construction as well as line maintenance in the future. Blanket easements expedited the connection process to minimize surveying and title work. Wade Trim assisted in educating residents about the program, obtaining easements, and providing construction inspection services.To minimize costs, a unit price agreement was established between the Village and DBO Contractor to construct the lateral service lines.This provided for an economies-of-scale approach that maximized efficiency and minimized cost.The DBO Contractor was also encouraged to use local plumbers for these connections to show a good faith investment back into the community. 2017-129-KB 27 MIAMI BEACH '. , ,., rro , r-_ r ��7mo FIRMNAME ROLE: -- - Wade Trim Lead Designer '-1 rp PROPU L) EAM . .....i•JMWr, MEMBERS' AA.r:!•:ipq% Mbei..n4'.v.'hu•.�M W.1�.. \* Holly Kremers, PE al•s, `, V4 4 f *1'a Tom Brzezinski, PE Dan Burden PhD PE � r � 1 M' Wan u,>s F •'rte xA. Alan Schwab, PE ,.; �rti� ., ,,�, � 4 CLIENT CONTACT: .J City of Palm Bay ° g , Eddie Fontanin, PE, ' aw�r;�:r Jnr umr�kak n Utilities Director 250 Osmosis Drive Palm Bay, FL 32909 PALM BAY WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN & 321.952.3410 HYDRAULIC MODELING fontanine@palmbayflorida.org PALM SAY, FL START DATE: 2008 COMPLETION DATE: 2008 The City of Palm Bay's sanitary collection system consists of a series TOTAL FEE: $9,500 of lift stations, force main and gravity sewers. As the City grows,the complexity of the City's collection system would also grow.To size a lift station at the appropriate Total Dynamic Head without adversely impacting the upstream lift stations is difficult. The City requested that Wade Trim provide them with a Wastewater Master Plan.The intent of this master plan was to provide the City with specific projects that required either upgrading or replacing and to prioritize them in their Five-, 10-and 15-Year Capital Improvement Projects(CIPs). The wastewater model was prepared on a transient model basis, meaning that the model takes into account flows based on the time of day per historical information provided by the City.The diurnal of the City was input for all booster stations and wastewater treat- ment plants.This enabled the model to simulate real-time situations, thus providing the City with a true sense of improvements required. SWMM was the wastewater modeling software used. Field monitoring and records from the City's SCADA network were the basis of inputting the recorded readings from the lift stations, and treatment plants into the model. Wade Trim included the City's field staff to verify the input along with the results as a QA/QC. In addition to the model being used to assist in the development of future CIPs the City also uses the model to review proposed lift station and collection systems from private development projects. As part of the City's private development review process,the Wastewa- ter Master Plan was used to ensure the appropriate-sized lift station pumps, force mains and gravity sewers were proposed.The model also allowed the City to view how much capacity from the wastewater treatment plants is remaining upon the incorporation of a develop- ment within their system. 2017-129-KB 28 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) STATE REVOLVING FUND (SRF) more than $45 million in SRF loans and continues to EXPERIENCE apply for more on an annual basis. Water and wastewater projects are typically accompa- Palm BayWater Main Projects State nied byfunding challenges. Wade Trim has experience ung g Revolving Fund in the development and securing of millions of dollars The City of Palm Bay has been approved for SRFs for in funds from a variety of regional, state, and federal pp several water main placement projects, listed below.. funding agencies, including the Florida Department of • Babcock Street Water Main Extension Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the Southwest • Cogan Road Water Main Extension Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD).Wade • DeGroodt/Osmosis Drive Water Main Trim has assisted the City of Palm Bay and Islamorada, Palm Bay Units 14, 17, 20, 46 Village of Islands in procuring funds from FDEP's State Revolving Fund (SRF) program for the development Asart of the State approval requests for of wastewater facilities. In addition to Islamorada and Asp pp process additional information were submitted to the City to Palm Bay, corporately Wade Trim has secured funding respondrior to final approval beinggranted. One for wastewater projects throughout the US.Wade Trim p pp of the requests made by the State was for a wetland has the technical expertise to assist clients by provid- survey/review to be conducted within the limits of ing the utility engineering and design support to en- the above-mentionedro'ects.The Cityrequested sure the project funded by the SRF is viable, construct- Wade q Wade Trim to undertake this task for all of the above ible, and efficient.To date,Wade Trim has successfully projects. Wade Trim used the City's GIS and the St. helped our clients obtain more than $50 million in SRF Johns River Water Management District's's SJRWMD loans in the State of Florida, and is currentlyworking (SJRWMD) g GIS for identifying wetland limits in the vicinity of the on another$25 million for plant and system improve- above-mentioned SRFJ ro'ects. ment projects. p The following services were provided: SRF Project Examples • Brief explanation of the scope of work Islamorada Design-Build Collection & p p • Identification of the location of the above- Transmission State Revolving Fund mentioned SRFrojects alongwetlands/ ByFlorida State mandate, Islamorada,Village of Is- surface with any g surface water within the project limits lands was required to construct a wastewater collec- • Approximate area of wetlands conflicting within tion and treatment system by the end of 2015 to elim- the project limits mate septic tanks within the Village. Islamorada hired Wade Trim as its Design-Build Criteria Consultant Work began within five days of Notice to Proceed and Owner's Representative/Construction Manager (NTP) and was completed within two weeks. procureDesign-Build-Operate to and oversee a Desi n-Build-O erate firm p to implement the Village's$132 million wastewater In addition to SRFro'ects Wade Trim has assisted master plan. p municipalities receive nearly$50 million in funding. Projects and funding agencies are shown in Exhibit The project consisted of Wade Trim assisting the 2.1.2. Village in implementing the Village's design-build delivery of its collection and distribution system.The scope of work included installing pipelines throughout every Village neighborhood to provide sewer service to each of its residents. Wade Trim assisted the Village in applying for SRF loans by preparing supporting documentation and an environmental assessment. To date, the Village has been successful in obtaining 2117-129-KB 29 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) Exhibit 2.1.2-Successful Grant Awards in Florida AGENCY CLIENT AMOUNT PROJECT Clean Water SRF City of Palm Bay $110,000 SRF Facility Plan for CIP Program Clean Water SRF City of Palm Bay $61,200 SRF Facility Plan for Palm Vista Clean Water SRF City of Palm Bay $50,000 Palm Bay Water Main Projects Clean Water SRF Islamorada, Village of Islands $45,000,000 Wastewater Transmission Program Clean Water SRF North Key Largo Utility $175,000 North Key Largo Utility Corporation WWTP Corporation Advanced Treatment and Reuse SWFWMD City of Clearwater $415,000 Greenwood Avenue Reclaimed Water& Streetscape Design SWFWMD City of Port Richey $95,000 Master Stormwater Management Plan SWFWMD City of Port Richey $476,000 Waterfront Park Habitat Restoration SWFWMD City of Safety Harbor $316,000 Green Springs Stormwater Improvement SWFWMD City of Safety Harbor $133,000 Master Stormwater Management Plan SWFWMD Cooperative Florida Governmental Funding Utility Authorit $3,100,000 Reclaimed Water System Improvements Y DCA City of Port Richey $40,000 Comprehensive Plan & EAR DCA City of Port Richey $110,000 Connerton Road Drainage Improvements DCA City of Port Richey $16,000 Repetitive Loss Studies FWCC City of Largo $50,000 Central Park- East Mitigation Area FWCC City of Port Richey $70,000 Nick's Park Dock Improvement FDEP City of Port Richey $100,000 Bike 'N' Hike Trail Right-of-way Acquisition FDEP City of Port Richey $63,000 Treadway Drive Drainage Improvements FDOT City of Port Richey $50,000 Waterfront District Intermodal MP, Phase I FDOT City of Port Richey $50,000 Waterfront District Intermodal MP, Phase II FDOT City of Port Richey $68,000 Bike 'N' Hike Trail Design, Phase FDOT City of Port Richey $81,000 Bike 'N' Hike Trail Design, Phase II FDOT City of Port Richey $276,000 Bike 'N' Hike Trail Construction FDOT City of Port Richey $315,000 Intermodal Parking Structure Design 2017-129-KB 30 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Exhibit 2.2.1- Project Manager Information Project Manager I Corrosion Control & Cor- rosion Remediation Subject Matter Expert Holly Kremers, PE (SME) Education: To maintain project continuity and give the overall BS, Environmental Engineering, ' "' Water&Wastewater Systems Projects contract focus, Michigan Technological our Project Organizational Chart identifies a single University .. BS, Biological Sciences, Michigan point of contact for the City. Holly Kremers, PE,will µM , Technological University continue to serve as our Project Manager and primary . , r contact person between the City and our team. Her Licenses/Certrf ications: hands-on leadership,system knowledge, and familiar- PE, Florida, No. 68130 ity with the City's organization will provide efficiency Qualifications: and continuity as projects progress from development 18 years' experience with utility design projects through construction.As the single point of contact, Proficient in pump station, collection system,water Holly will interact with City staff regarding project main, and force main design details, budgets, and schedules, and rely on the exper- Successfully manages and delivers utility projects on tise of team members to deliver the project. Exhibit time and under budget 2.2.1 highlights some of Holly's experience. Relevant Project Management Experience: Miami Beach Sunset Harbour Neighborhood Holly will be serving as our Corrosion Control &Corro- Improvements sion Remediation Subject Matter Expert. She has led Miami Beach Palm & Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood corrosion control studies and provided recommenda- Improvements tion for water systems in Florida including the FGUA FGUA Seven Springs Corrosion Control Study Seven Springs system. FGUA Raw Water Transmission Mains Pasco Systems Utilities Expansion City of Venice Water Main Replacement Program In addition, Holly serves as Wade Trim's national FGUA-Pasco CountyUtilityDesign corrosion control expert and has led our operations g FGUA Mad Hatter System Mapping& Modeling services group through several studies and remedia- FGUA Lindrick Water System Improvements tion efforts. Hillsborough County SCADA Standards Waterway Estates Design-Build Pump Station Principal-In-Charge / QA/QC Tom Brzezinski, PE, has 28 years of experience manag- AWARDS AWWA Region IV Volunteer of the Year, 2012 ing, designing, and constructing various sized munici- pal engineering projects. He has a strong background Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers Engineer- ing Excellence Award,2013 in water/wastewater/reclaimed water utility projects and is well-versed in a magnitude of project types and Water for People Kenneth J. Miller Founders Award, understands what it takes to deliver projects success- 2014 fully.Tom has been involved in the design and con- struction of many transmission mains in urban settings throughout Florida and the Midwest. He understands the critical issues associated with these project types and how to deliver quick, cost-effective solutions.Tom also has a strong background in program management techniques and is knowledgeable in several cost moni- toring and schedule control applications. 2017-129-KB 31 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) Water Distribution System / Water Distribution Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations SME Design Engineer SME Daniel Burden, PhD, PE, has 39 years of experience Daniel Garcia, PE, PTOE, has 19 years of civil engi- in the areas of water resources including water and neering experience on major infrastructure works wastewater master planning, wastewater collection, internationally. His varied functions within the en- wastewater treatment, pumping, and disposal permit- gineering sector have included design, construction ting. Dr. Burden served as a member of WEF's Alterna- management, internal audit,financial analysis, and tive Sewer Systems Task Force, served as a technical strategy. Dan has participated on highway, bridge, reviewer on WEF's Manual of Practice#-FD-12 "Al- traffic, seaport, airport, mass transit, and water and ternative Sewer Systems", and currently serves as a sewer projects. member of WEF's Water Reuse Committee. Dan serves as our SME for water distribution, and Water & Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer SME has years of experience designing water distribution Natalie Shaber, PE, has nine years of experience in wa- systems throughout southeast Florida, including three ter and wastewater hydraulics and design.Throughout projects for the City of Miami Beach. Dan is familiar her career, success has been achieved through contin- with the challenges of working in an aging system, and ual development and application of technical exper- understantds the approval and permitting processes tise, professional communication, and the develop- required. ment of cooperative relationships with all internal and external customers. Wastewater Collection System / Wastewater Collection Design Engineer SME While much of Natalie's experience has come from Aleem Ghany, PE, has 25 years of municipal engineer- the governmental and regulatory sectors, her experi- ing experience. His expertise includes project manage- ence reviewing and participating in hydraulics projects ment, design, construction inspection and administra- provides immeasurable benefit to our team. tion, design and evaluation of water and wastewater systems, water and sewer modeling, pump station WADE TRIM'S DELIVERY TEAM evaluation and design, permitting, and cost estimat- Our delivery team is led by highly qualified individuals ing. Aleem's experience includes design and permit- proficient in resolving any technical issues facing City ting of water and wastewater services, force mains, projects.These individuals are familiar with the re- gravity mains, and water distribution. His construction quirements to perform the services listed in the RFQ, management experience includes supervising inspec- and are confident they can meet project challenges. tors' activities, pre-construction conferences, regular Their confidence is based on years of solving similar site visits, shop drawing review, design modifications, issues for clients across the State. Our delivery team is contract administration, and acting as a liaison be- organized by the areas of project delivery consistent tween the owner, contractor, and engineer. with the RFQ so the most qualified individuals are cre- ating solutions where they have the most experience. Water Pumping Stations SME Ricardo Borromeo, PE, has 18 years of experience in Our organizational chart is located on the following the engineering, planning, and design of water and page. wastewater treatment plants,water and wastewater transmission systems, pump stations, storage facilities, and disposal fields. His project experience includes de- sign of a reclaimed water transmission system for the City of Crystal River,the Sunset Harbour Pump Station project for the City of Miami Beach, and the Water Main Replacement Program for the City of Venice. 2017-129-KB 32 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach Principal-In-Charge/QA/QC Tom Brzezinski, PE Project Manager Holly Kremers,PE Subject Matter Expert Water Distribution System Water Distribution Design Engineer Daniel Garcia, PE, PTOE Daniel Garcia, PE, PTOE Wastewater Collection System Wastewater Collection Design Engineer Aleem Ghany, PE Aleem Ghany, PE Water Pumping Stations Water&Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer Ricardo Borromeo, PE Natalie Shaber, PE Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations Corrosion Control &Corrosion Remediation Dan Burden, PhD, PE Holly Kremers, PE Support Staff GIS/Mapping Construction Management Pump Station Electrical & Amanda Warner,AICP David Mullen, El Instrumentation ;;/ // Alan Schwab, PE p Hydraulic Modeling Design Production iff;07'1 // Kristin Darby, El Dave McKone Roadway Improvements Carey Wright, PE Utility Relocations Maintenance of Traffic Josh Donegan, El John Melendez, El Survey/Geotech/Environmental Local subconsultants, as needed 4-, 2017-129-KB 33 MIAMI BEACH HOLLY KREMERS, PE ROLE Project Manager/Corrosion Control &Cor- proximately 10,500 LF of new water mains will rosion Remediation SME be installed on Hibiscus Island, and 7,000 LF on Palm Island. EDUCATION BS, Environmental Engineering, Michigan • Sunset Harbour Neighborhood Infrastructure Technological University Improvements,City of Miami Beach,FL.Design BS, Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological Manager.The City of Miami Beach was experi- University encing stormwater drainage challenges in the Sunset Harbour neighborhood,which is one of REGISTRATION the lowest-lying areas in the City.As part of a Professional Engineer: FL Design-Build team,Wade Trim performed ICPR drainage modeling and evaluation of the sys- QUALIFICATIONS tem to provide fast-tracked recommendations > Client-focused professional civil engineer and for both collection and stormwater pumping project manager with 18 years of experience in improvements to reduce flooding in the neigh- a broad range of municipal water and waste- borhood.The drainage system improvements water projects were completed in early 2015. Holly was also the > Primary focus is design and project man- prime contact with the permitting agencies for agement for utility projects including pump expedited delivery of this project. station,water storage facility,treatment plant, and distribution piping construction. • Espanola Way Streetscape Improvements, City > Has worked with municipal clients on projects of Miami Beach, FL. Project Manager. Provided ranging from water and wastewater transmis- design, permitting, and CM services for con- sion line layout to system master planning and version of an iconic road to a pedestrian mall. modeling To minimize future disruption to commercial > Serving as Technical Lead on projects address- tenants, aged utilities were scheduled to be ing sea level rise in South Florida replaced in conjunction with the streetscape improvements. Main design considerations REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE were maintaining emergency access to accom- Palm &Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Im- modate the City's largest fire truck, and pro- provements,City of Miami Beach, FL. Design viding pavement and streetscape design that Manager Managed design and project efforts maintained the historic Mediterranean feel of for Wade Trim and Lanzo Construction to per- the area and approved by the City's Historic form Design-Build services. The neighborhood Preservation Board. improvements include raising and reconstruct- ing the roadways, constructing a new drainage • Engineering&CIP Program, Florida Govern- system with pumped outfalls, new water main mental Utility Authority(FGUA), Longwood, installation, relocation of some water services, FL. Project Manager. Managed program of utility undergrounding, and roadway lighting more than 40 capital improvement and en- and streetscape improvements.The stormwa- gineering projects for struggling water and ter drainage system requires design and instal- wastewater utility systems owned and operat- lation of three new pump stations with outfalls ed by FGUA in several counties.The governing to Biscayne Bay.The water distribution system municipalities participate in FGUA decisions improvements includes new 8-inch ductile iron regarding the system via inter-local agree- water main throughout both of the islands. ments. Projects have included due diligence The water mains will be installed along the reports for potential new system purchases, public streets, and will include new fire hydrant master planning, development of CIPs, hy- assemblies,tie-ins to the existing water mains, draulic modeling, and alternatives analyses and service connections at each parcel.Ap- for utility system improvements, as well as 2017-129-KB 34 MIAMI BEACH HOLLY KREMERS,PE design and construction oversight for several it protected from the evaporation and exfiltration water and wastewater improvement projects. that occurred in the ponds.The pond system will CIP project rankings were tied to regulatory be used for wet weather disposal. requirements, utility system capacity needs, strategic planning, level of service and resident • Aqua System Due Diligence, FGUA, Fort concerns. Scheduling was based on regulatory Myers,FL. Project Manager. FGUA acquired requirements and funding availability. Over- several small to medium-sized utility systems saw self-performed design for force mains, throughout Florida,formerly owned by Aqua pump stations, reclaimed water systems,water Utilities. Wade Trim was part of the acquisition treatment plants, and wastewater treatment team for these utility systems, and performed facilities. Worked with FGUA to develop de- facility assessments for each water treatment sign-build delivery model and standard form plant (WTP), wastewater treatment plant of agreement for first time use on wastewater (WWTP), and lift station to estimate the dollar treatment plant improvement projects with a value of capital improvements that would be tight time frame. required over the following five years.The assessment was conducted for 72 WTPs, 23 • Seven Springs Water System Improvements, WWTPs, and 30 collection systems ranging in FGUA,New Port Richey,FL.Project Manager/En- size from 1 to 77 lift stations. gineer of Record.Responsible for leading a team of engineers and designers rehabilitate a water • Replacement/Rehabilitation of 72-inch San- utility with black,odorous,corrosive water. Initial itary Sewer Force Main, Miami-Dade County tasks included a corrosion control study,imple- Water and Sewer Department(WASD),Mi- mentation of corrosion control chemical treat- ami, FL. Production Manager. Led the design ment,development of a hydraulic model,and efforts for an emergency design-build project development of a capital program for long-term for WASD to replace/rehabilitate more than improvements. 3 miles of 72- inch PCCP sanitary sewer force main.The design included 8-inch and 16-inch • FGUA-Pasco County Water System Interconnec- temporary bypass piping to ensure that waste- tions,FGUA,New Port Richey,FL.Project Engi- water service was maintained for the three neer.Responsible for leading a team of engineers municipalities that share the force main during and designers for placement and design of five construction. In addition, more than %-mile interconnections between the Florida Govern- of new 60-inch force main was constructed to mental Utility Authority(FGUA)and Pasco County connect the areas of HDPE sliplined 72-inch water systems.The interconnections consisted pipe. Wade Trim provided design, permitting, of above-grade meter and valve assemblies, plus and construction support services. associated underground piping.Two miles of water main extension were required to complete the interconnections. • Seven Springs Reclaimed System Improvements, FGUA/SWFWMD,New Port Richey,FL.Proj- ect Manager.Conducted a jointly-funded study with the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA)and the Southwest Florida Water Man- agement District(SWFWMD)to investigate the reclaimed system operation and provide an alternatives analysis for system improvements.A covered ground storage tank was selected for di- urnal storage because the sealed system will keep 2017-129-KB 35 MIAMI BEACH nT,ICn'rma P7/!/T!L7. 4.,mn ,, 7A n o p/i mnn,,.N>''� Mm.,....,.R ,;rn:a ,,�', :.,,m��,,,. ✓mr�,��;�r n ,. �r.,/i,.n rr:m/m rm%�?�n,,m/ryrrrrm?�9. �.,rm.,!�/mrm ��.:i..�..t✓,,.,�urG...r, r r :, ,„ .,/r. v:: :, Gn4rl�Gur/a/G/u✓U�.�✓//Wud!/aJi//✓i/v�////lu.�.prG✓Jr/i✓,mmr✓,�r./r,.r✓.r,r:.�._J,.dv.��:4r/niuw,:;ry.:',r:.�....,�.,.,,:�rrL.,,,_4tLy,.r//,m✓_r,,.,,,,,G LrG.......,✓..<.u.W.,,:.::.,....,..y..,.,...,..,,.e..,,.,,wa,./�,,...l.G�ub¢////G✓/m�u,r�,r✓,rtiy.✓rr,lr.,uG..v,,.„u„wJ.,,cm�n.rW9:,......I,:. l,. I: L/: �:/r. y TOM BRZEZINSKI, PE ROLE Principal-In-Charge four requisite vacuum pump stations,transmis- sion force mains, and transfer pump facilities. EDUCATION Improvements included 40 miles of roadway MBA, Management/Finance Wayne State and 8 miles of water main and residential University service line connections. Blanket easements BSCE, Michigan State University were used to expedite the resident connection process on private property and minimize sur- REGISTRATION veying and title work.A design-build-operate Professional Engineer: FL (DBO) delivery model was used to assist the community in future operation. Led develop- QUALIFICATIONS ment of master schedule, project definition, > 28 years of experience managing, designing, and procurement support services including and constructing various sized municipal engi- RFQ process to shortlist firms and RFP pro- neering projects cess to select a firm. Oversaw development of > Knowledgeable of CIP delivery, specifically col- process and SCADA equipment standards, and lection and distribution systems programs installation procedures. Managed pilot pro- > Has honed his ability to develop practical solu- gram to establish design standards and provide lions, find construction cost savings, interact a shovel-ready design. Oversaw design reviews with multiple stakeholders, and deliver tangi- and value engineering process that identified ble results $380,000 in cost-saving alternatives. Oversaw > Insights on how to best manage pipeline construction management, inspection, proj- construction and rehabilitation to minimize ect controls, and project start-up. Supported impacts in residential and commercial areas coordination with four regulatory agencies and community outreach meetings with residents. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Palm&Hibiscus Islands Infrastructure Improve- • Engineering&CIP Program, Florida Govern- ments,City of Miami Beach,FL.Design Principal. mental Utility Authority(FGUA), Longwood, Design-build project for neighborhood improve- FL. Principal-In-Charge. Managed program ments that raised infrastructure to address the of more than 40 capital improvement and rising sea level. Required extensive stakeholder engineering projects for struggling water and coordination to raise and reconstruct roadways, wastewater utility systems owned and operat- a new drainage system with pumped outfalls, ed by FGUA in several counties.The governing new water mains and relocation of some water municipalities participate in FGUA decisions services,utility undergrounding,and roadway regarding the system via inter-local agree- lighting and streetscape improvements.Water ments. Projects have included due diligence main work required new fire hydrant assem- reports for potential new system purchases, blies,tie-ins to existing water mains and service master planning, development of CIPS, hy- connections at each parcel. More than 3 miles of draulic modeling, and alternatives analyses new water main was installed. for utility system improvements, as well as design and construction oversight for several • Sanitary Collection &Pumping Program, water and wastewater improvement projects. Islamorada,Village of Islands, FL. Program CIP project rankings were tied to regulatory Manager.The program was a $130 million cen- requirements, utility system capacity needs, tralized wastewater collection and treatment strategic planning, level of service and resident system planned, designed, and constructed to concerns. Scheduling was based on regulatory meet a state-mandated deadline over a five- requirements and funding availability. Over- year period.The program replaced septic tanks saw self-performed design for force mains, with more than 80 miles of varying diameter pump stations, reclaimed water systems,water vacuum sanitary sewer/force main systems, treatment plants, and wastewater treatment 2017-129—KB 36 MIAMI BEACH iTOA/m'�r��'/!'9An909'A9r1�n0 9rr/n'.�i n,I/.990,/901'0 ',i"77� ,..,. nmmA.. ,.. o, r, .. , ,..... .,,��:.::,.�,T//�/n,/I/9.....:. ..,, 9�!Tmrmi/' ,:.,mn?�»'m/,�1,.,.�/.''�'m!9r/I/h�.. r. .....:.. :. ....r.,,, ,.,r r r. , r ,,, r ,.i>r../;, ..I r,/i,//%'4/'�'�: ".Y'':',111111e/111 // ''% Juu,�.,,n,r�,vv/vwl�d/.lSG//vLur4G�i/./�//,uuJG//i/i/u/////.../r//G/✓rI/�GG/vrd�/�///id./IvrL.rL r// ,".,,.,:� r:,;r,."i ,",,, :, ,,u/r;H,,,r',rusr.�/i//I / -ry� ,r' u r �r,�./ r I //7/1111,4," ,„", vGGU<u/ia.buu�Jl4G.u..,�....�Lu ✓...u,,...r,...uvu,..rre.ruu.c. �.u,.,.,�.G.,.rr✓�>.::,wt..77777:7:77:77 � :, � ������/i. TOM BRZEZINSKI,PE facilities. Worked with FGUA to develop de- station to be used as the model for future sta- sign-build delivery model and standard form tions to be constructed on the remaining four of agreement for first time use on wastewater islands. treatment plant improvement projects with a tight time frame. • Waterway Estates Design-Build Pipeline, Florida Governmental Utility Authority, Fort • South Regional Water Reclamation Facility,City Myers, FL. Project Director.Wade Trim devel- of Palm Bay,FL.Principal-In-Charge.The City of oped a Design Criteria Package and construc- Palm Bay required increased treatment capacity tion oversight to interconnect flows from the of its wastewater treatment facilities. In accor- Waterway Estates area to the Del Prado Waste- dance with the City's Wastewater Master Plan,a water Treatment Plant(WWTP).This project 2.0 million gallon per day(MGD)water reclama- provides new, adequate pumping and 20 miles tion facility(WRF)was constructed at the South of combined force main and gravity convey- Regional Utility site.This alternative gave the City ance systems to direct flow generally north a total of 7.2 MGD of wastewater treatment ca- to the Del Prado WWTP. Flows are conveyed pacity and 4.3 MGD of reuse capacity.Wade Trim through a myriad of urban areas and corridors. provided engineering services to develop a basis Tom oversaw traffic control, resident coordi- of design for the facility design.Services included nation, and permitting,which were significant project definition development,design-builder items that were dealt with on the project. pre-qualification process development and over- all design-build criteria consulting. • Peachtree Street Water Main Replacement, City of Cocoa, FL. Principal-In-Charge,The • Utility Acquisition Assistance,FGUA,FL.Princi- project consisted of providing the engineering, pal-In-Charge.Through an as-needed services construction, and permitting documentation contract,Tom and the Wade Trim Team provided for the replacement of the existing 8-inch utility system evaluations for ongoing acquisition cast iron water main with 2,700 linear feet of and consolidation projects. Relevant services new 8-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride(PVC) are provided for system throughout Florida that water main. As part of the project,the City was include Aloha, Lindrick,and Consolidated in Pasco presented with construction alternatives and County; North Fort Myers Utility in Lee County; recommendations to reduce cost and acceler- City of Palm Bay in Brevard County;and MacDill ate the project schedule. Because this water Airforce Base. main was located in the Brevard County right- of-way but owned by the City of Cocoa, coordi- • Middle Plantation Key Wastewater Collection nation and good communication was required System Vacuum Pump Station, Islamorada, to ensure the design met with the expectations Village of Islands, FL. Project Manager. Re- and requirements of both municipalities. Wade sponsible for design of the vacuum pump Trim additionally provided the construction station used to collect wastewater from the engineering effort to successfully complete this residential and commercial customers of Mid- project. dle Plantation Key.The project also included design of force main to transmit wastewater from the vacuum pump station to the booster pump station in North Plantation Key and the conceptual design for a 14-mile future force main to connect.The project took into account the harsh saltwater environment, high water table, and rock sub-grade of the Florida Keys to provide the Village with the flagship pumping 2017-129-KB 37 MIAMI BEACH ::•:::': r 'i::,I r ','r'. '':'': ::: ;'i"'. "/:'r /:.,I'.I'..:. Ir/ 'I:r,rr I r. r/ Irl r r../r r. r./.,l r.I r r li.....I.rr/II.rII I/I r /Ir rr/,/ r r :•.r / I r r..../r,rL.r//r N./Ir 1/irI./.III r�i.r,/i./,..r,/I.Ili./rJ.,..i,i.../,//.,.rI.rI,Ir,lr1//.r/////./.I.l,,I.i.rl.�/i./rr./r//l/i,IIr,./JIri./.../Il.,/ir//r,�r...i..../,/,Ir./I/I r//////.rl.r./.iL///./:/r,1rr.r,.,.Ir1..../rIrI1r/r/,.Ir/.,1�uI:/I./r,rI/r:r.ir.:,I..r,r../i..r.,•r.r I.rI:./lr r.IIIrr.r,/1,..:,:.r..,...r.,.r/.....r.l,r/.I.r/.rrr L/r..//.._r/.,../r,..r/I./.1//.../.r./L,,�..../,.r..I./,.H,,....✓r,..r,I/l/I.��,rv.r..�/I.,.r.//✓l../:./.i�./.r..I,.n..,/..Ii/II..r//,i,.Il.r,,�/.,/.n,..�1/ue/..r..,r..1,L,.�...r..N/..//.I.r/././.,./...N.I,.r././..,...//./..�./,.....�.�IO..,J.Ii.rrr..i/.�..l..../rrr,,,I//11I/i�l m/r ���� G/ 4,r N/r rn�b�/C7727 ,/MAW*AW*rrr DANIEL GARCIA, PE, PTOE ROLE Water Distribution System/Water Distribu- neighborhood,which is one of the lowest-lying tion Design Engineer SME areas in the City.As part of a Design-Build team, Wade Trim performed ICPR drainage modeling EDUCATION and evaluation of the system to provide fast- MBA, New York University tracked recommendations for both collection and MS,Civil Engineering,Oregon State University stormwater pumping improvements to reduce BS, Civil Engineering, University of Florida flooding in the neighborhood.The recommen- dations were approved by the City,the South REGISTRATION Florida Water Management District(SFWMD), Professional Engineer: FL and Miami-Dade County Environmental Resource Management. QUALIFICATIONS > 19 years of experience on large infrastructure • Palm&Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Im- projects across the US provements,City of Miami Beach,FL. Project > Familiarity with all local Authorities Having Manager Managed design and project efforts Jurisdiction in South Florida for Wade Trim and Lanzo Construction to per- > Worked on a variety of water and wastewater form design-build services.The neighborhood projects, providing services including design, improvements include new water main installa- permit coordination,validation, and manage- tion throughout both islands,constructing a new ment drainage system with force main and pumped outfalls, raising and reconstructing the roadways REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE and sidewalks, relocation of some water services, • Replacement/Rehabilitation of 72-inch San- utility undergrounding,and roadway lighting itary Sewer Force Main on NW/NE 159th and streetscape improvements.The stormwater Street from NW 17th Avenue&NE 10th Av- drainage system requires design and installa- enue,Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer tion of three new pump stations with outfalls Department,Miami,FL.Project Manager.Led to Biscayne Bay.The project required fast-track the design and project management efforts for construction to minimize impact to the residents an emergency design-build project to replace/ of the Islands. Dan's responsibilities include proj- rehabilitate more than 3 miles of 72-inch PCCP ect includes utility undergrounding,stormwater sanitary sewer force main.The design included system replacement,water distribution system 8-inch and 16-inch temporary bypass piping to replacement,roadway reconstruction,streets- ensure that wastewater service was maintained cape improvements,and street lighting design. for the three municipalities that share the force main during construction. In addition, more than • NE 203rd Street&NE 215th Street Intersec- -mile of new 60-inch force main was construct- tion Improvements between US 1&West ed to connect the areas of HDPE sliplined 72-inch Dixie Highway PD&E Study, Florida Depart- pipe.Wade Trim provided design, permitting,and ment of Transportation, District 6, Miami, FL. construction support services for the design-build Project Manager. Led team that performed or- project. Dan's responsibilities include managing igin-destination studies, speed studies, queue the design team for this design-build project.The studies, and traffic data collection (bidirection- project includes emergency repairs using a sliplin- al volume counts, turning movement counts). ing approach for more than three miles of force The purpose of the study is to evaluate the main pipeline. potential grade separation at the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway line crossings of NE 203rd • Sunset Harbour Neighborhood Improvements, Street/Ives Dairy Road and/or NE 215th Street City of Miami Beach,FL.Project Manager.The to eliminate vehicle conflicts with existing City of Miami Beach was experiencing stormwa- freight and future passenger trains of the FEC ter drainage challenges in the Sunset Harbour Railway, while enhancing traffic. 2017-129-KB 38 MIAMI BEACH r - ,• ,,,, ,mTm,�: m^.,.^^^^^ .....Tn.nr' :^ .?inn .. , ..... .. ... __ , r,;.., ,,...,:' /..,::.., • r 41100,000,14 4p/:%i� WiG0W/l0,00*%/;#///://,:i//,//:•: ALEEM GHANY, PE ROLE Wastewater Collection System/Wastewa- implementation, and evaluation of construc- ter Collection Design Engineer SME tion/renovation projects, management studies, introduction of new programs, and various EDUCATION professional services; defined the scope of MS, Public Administration, Florida International projects; identified and ensured proper al- University location of financial, material, and human BS, Civil Engineering, Florida International resources committed to projects; formulated University solutions and resolved problems;facilitated implementation of projects; and provided REGISTRATION administrative support to projects as needed. Professional Engineer: FL Coordinated and supervised all day-to-day op- Certified General Contractor erations on the Biscayne Landing site for per- Certified Underground Utility Contractor mit requirements, landfill closure compliance, and Miami-Dade Regulatory and Economic QUALIFICATIONS Resources (RER). Liaised with other govern- > 25 years of municipal engineering experience mental agencies, including RER, Miami-Dade > Former City Manager and Public Works/Utility Water and Sewer Department (WASD), FEMA, Director for the City of North Miami South Florida Water Management District > Strong relationships with local and state regu- (SFWMD), and various other city, state, and lators federal agencies. Planned and coordinated departmental activities, made recommenda- REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE tions concerning the operation of the various • City of North Miami, FL.City Manager.Served divisions: streets and rights-of-way, sanitation, as the Chief Executive Officer overseeing the facility maintenance, fleet, water and sewer, day-to-day administrative operations,managed water plant, and stormwater.Also developed the citywide budget of$150 million, prepared de- annual fiscal budgets and five-year CIP bud- partmental budget for the administrative office, gets; managed and supervised various levels of reviewed departmental budget requests from all staff in coordinating departmental projects; as- City departments and divisions for inclusion in sessed personnel needs and equipment needs the administrative recommendation to the City to formulate the most cost-effective means Council,ensured compliance with all legal and of providing services; evaluated work activ- procedural requirements,directed and managed ities through review of work plans, reports, the operations of the City, provided direction to conferences, and inspections; prepared and all City functions falling under the authority of reviewed performance evaluations; initiated the City Council,oversaw and participated in the disciplinary actions; made selection of qualified resolution of inquiries and complaints from the personnel to fill vacant positions; maintained public and other organizations,and established, a current knowledge of applicable policies, monitored,and evaluated progress toward goals laws,and regulations, and awareness of new and objectives of the administration. In addition, materials, procedures, trends, and advances in as the Executive Director of the Community the profession; read professional literatures; Redevelopment Agency(CRA),directed and maintained professional affiliations; attended managed the operations of the CRA, provided di- conferences,workshops, and training sessions, rection to CRA staff successfully,and transitioned as appropriate. Major accomplishments during the organization to improve the overall agency this time included establishing and creating reporting and management. a Stormwater Utility Division, assisting with the Biscayne Landing negotiations and lease • City of North Miami, FL. Public Works/Utility agreement with present developer, overseeing Director Coordinated all construction projects the design for the Winson Water Treatment for the City, including the planning, design, Plant upgrade, completing$8.5 million FEMA 2017-129-KB 39 MIAMI BEACH r. • r/ .r r r;.... ..,r r r• :, r r r'':'r r •. ..r r r ::. r::..r r/// / ./, ..r.r:l.r /.•, .r/.,rr r•.....r/, r, i.).•.. r r r ...rr. ./.r „• i•:, •..r/..r.... r.:.,.. ......r... .: ::..: ..,. i..'.', ::::: r •:'..is r ....:::r •//r / / /rr.///// r•. ..r r r/ .r / ../ ..... •r: r..r../r r r r, ....r... ,.,.,.,...r.//••.r:r. /... / rli..../ •/ rr•/,/r./ .r/rr/•/r rr/., x.•,.r r. /.! / / r/•r • /. ..,.. .:..r.... ...../r/i�/.., ��/ ••r!/ r,/ / ��//r.,i./N//,�.. //.... //.✓./.L./r r/ r.I.rnr/.,r/..r//,//...i,......r. .,�•/%,.�//////.,./I/../.r... ,..r..,i,,,rr/,r,i[,/r.r..i:rr/r....r,/..r..r ..rr./,:,r../•r...u_:/,... •.....////ror.,,r r,.,,•_/,,. r ,, .....r...•r/r.r/•it !. .,.i. ......, / ...,,.//.,.,....�i/�..,.r..r...r.ir ....r.... .....,.. r r......... ....••.. ,r.....,......r../ ....•..ir r.......�.H.///.......r...c.,.r/:r i..r„.....r/. :,:::,. r, ::4;:.,✓/r•i.�..r,. �r�:ir/r•r,�rr r/i l:'. :,/S, .. ALEEM GHANY,PE 1345 projects for drainage improvement behalf of the City citywide, negotiating with FEMA on changes • Negotiated and obtained from the State of to FIRM maps, implementing a new water and Florida a State Revolving Fund (SRF) allocation sewer rate structure, securing State Revolving of$40M,to be used for the Winson Water Loans to improve the City's water plant, water, Treatment Plant; $25 million for water and15 and sewer infrastructure, and lift stations, and $ implementing outsourcing of the Solid Waste million for the water conveyance transmission Department. system • Oversaw the design and construction of the Representative projects completed during tenure Joe Celestin Center, a 20,000 SF, LEED-certified, as Public Works/Utility Director include: and state-of-the-art building • Oversaw design and construction to upsize existing force main to 4,000 LF of new 20-inch PVC force main along NE 16th Avenue • Oversaw the design and construction of 6,500 LF of new 12-inch force main along Biscayne Boulevard from 121St Street to 105th Street. • Oversaw the design and construction of more than 3,100 LF of new 16-inch force main for the City of North Miami on NE 131St Street • Oversaw the design and construction/ renovation of the North Miami Library • Main/replacement of more than 24,000 water meters in the North Miami Collection System • Oversaw the design and construction of Oleta State Park wastewater system, including approximately 5,000 LF of 6-inch force main and pump station improvement • Oversaw the design and construction of approximately 4,000 LF of 16 and 10-inch diameter water main installation from Florida International University(North Campus)to the Sole Mia site • Upgrades to several sanitary sewer pump stations to comply with present peak flow management regulations • Upgrades to wastewater collection and transmission system, in compliance with the first and second cycle of the City's SSES compliance report • Negotiated the largest land development agreement in Miami Dade County, Sole Mia (formerly Biscayne Landing Development) on 2017-129-KB 40 MIAMI BEACH RICARDO BORROMEO, PE ROLE Water Pumping Stations SME undergrounding,and roadway lighting and street- scape improvements.Venice Water Main Re- EDUCATION placement Phasing Program,City of Venice, FL— MS, Environmental Engineering, Project Engineer.Wade Trim developed a phased Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology water main replacement program for the City of BS, Chemical Engineering, University of Notre Venice to address aging infrastructure concerns Dame and to relocate water mains from rear-lot ease- ments to the right-of-way for ease of access.The REGISTRATION phasing was developed to divide the area into Professional Engineer: FL eight projects that are similar in cost,and to first address areas that are experiencing water main QUALIFICATIONS breaks or water quality/pressure issues.After > 18 years of experience in engineering, plan- completing the phasing program,Wade Trim was ning, and design of water and wastewater selected for design and construction oversight of treatment plants, water and wastewater trans- the second and fourth phases. mission, pump stations, storage systems, and disposal fields • SR 45A(US 41 Venice Bypass)Water Main Re- > Proven ability to design pipeline in highly con- placement,Sarasota County,FL.Lead Design En- gested, urban corridors gineer.The project involved replacement of 4-to > Extensive knowledge in hydraulic modeling of 10-inch—diameter asbestos cement water mains pipeline installations with a single 12-inch—diameter PVC water main. The water main replacement extended nearly 1.5 REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE miles through a commercial corridor,and includ- • Sunset Harbour Neighborhood Infrastructure ed replacement of water services and hydrants Improvements,City of Miami Beach,FL.De- along the route.The water main was designed in sign Engineer.Collection system improvements conjunction with an FDOT roadway and drainage were designed and constructed to remove water improvement project. from the streets faster,and to tie the collection systems for each of the pump stations together • Replacement/Rehabilitation of 72-inch Sanitary for added reliability.As part of the complete Sewer Force Main,Miami-Dade County Water neighborhood improvements project,the water and Sewer Department(WASD),Miami,FL, main was fully replaced with 12-inch lines,and Lead Engineer.Responsible for design efforts for street and sidewalk elevations were raised to an emergency design-build project for WASD to ensure they were above the anticipated sea level replace/rehabilitate more than 3 miles of 72-inch during seasonal high tides.The elevation change PCCP sanitary sewer force main.The design in- required unique harmonization features for each cluded 8-inch and 16-inch temporary bypass pip- building entrance, patio,and driveway.Wade ing to ensure wastewater service was maintained Trim prepared renderings of the neighborhood for the three municipalities that share the force improvements and presented the concepts to the main during construction. In addition, more than neighborhood association. 'A-mile of new 60-inch force main was construct- ed to connect the areas of HDPE sliplined 72-inch • Palm&Hibiscus Islands Neighborhood Infra- pipe.Wade Trim provided design, permitting,and structure Improvements,City of Miami Beach, construction support services. FL.Design Engineer.The neighborhood improve- ments include raising and reconstructing the • Venice Water Main Replacement Program, roadways,constructing a new drainage system City of Venice,FL.Project Engineer.Wade Trim with pumped outfalls, new water main installa- developed a phased water main replacement tion, relocation of some water services, utility program for the City to address aging infrastruc- 2017-129-KB 41 MIAMI BEACH RICARDO BORROMEO, PE ture concerns and to relocate water mains from rear-lot easements to the right-of-way for ease of access.The phasing was developed to divide the area into eight projects that are similar in cost, and to first address areas that are experiencing water main breaks or water quality/pressure issues.After completing the phasing program, Wade Trim was selected for design and construc- tion oversight of the second and fourth phases. • Marriott Lift Station, City of Marathon, FL. De- sign Engineer.Wade Trim designed a wastewa- ter lift station and force main to serve the pro- posed Courtyard Marriott Hotel in Marathon. The lift station, located on the hotel property, connects the force main and extends approx- imately 5,700 feet east along Overseas High- way from the hotel to the Area 3 Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP). Although there is an existing 4-inch force main and a vacuum collection system in Overseas Highway near the Marriott site,the existing infrastructure cannot handle the additional flow from the Marriott. Recent studies have shown the vacuum system is above capacity. The existing force main is stressed due to a high-pressure pump station connected to the force main that generally has low-pressure grinder pump stations. • Northwest Hillsborough Pipeline Project,Tam- pa, FL. Quality Control Reviewer.This project involved installing required infrastructure to supply the Hillsborough County Northwest Water Treatment Plant with regional water from Tampa Bay Water's Regional Transmission System. This project also includes emergency connections at the Northwest WTP and the City of St. Petersburg Cosme WTP to supply finished water to Tampa Bay Water under emergency conditions. • City of Crystal River Reclaimed Water Project, Citrus County, FL. Lead Technical Professional. This project involves the design of a reclaimed water transmission system (8 miles of 16-inch piping)from the City's wastewater spray field to the Progress Energy Crystal River Energy Complex. Mr. Borromeo provided design for the ground storage tank and pump station. 2017-129-KB 42 MIAMI BEACH DANIEL BURDEN, PHD, PE ROLE Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations SME erGEMS,to identify areas of the City that did not meet the performance standard set by the EDUCATION City, and to plan for expansion of the system. PhD, Civil/Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University • Wastewater Improvement Program Owner's ME, Civil/Environmental Engineering, Louisiana Representative Islamorada,Village of Islands, State University FL.Technical Review Team Member.The proj- BS, Biology/Chemistry, Harding University ect was a $100M Design-Build-Operate central- ized wastewater collection system. Engineering REGISTRATION plan reviews were completed for vacuum Professional Engineer: FL sewer collection systems and low-pressure collection sewer systems designed for con- QUALIFICATIONS struction in the Village service area. Additional > Extensive experience with design, permitting, evaluations were completed for alternative and construction of utility projects including collection systems located in isolated areas. wastewater collection systems, reclaimed Responsibilities also included development of water systems, water supply, and wastewater Village Utility Policy Manual, Minimum Design treatment facilities and Construction Standards and Specifications, > Member of the Owner's Representative Team and Grinder Pump Specifications for DBO con- that oversaw the$100M Design-Build-Oper- tract documents. ate wastewater improvement program in the Florida Keys • Seven Springs Reclaimed Water System > Obtained the first FDEP permit issued for Improvements, Florida Governmental Util- blending nanofiltration concentrate with ity Authority(FGUA), New Port Richey, FL. reclaimed water for use in a slow-rate public Design Team Member/Technical Reviewer. access land application system in Palm Beach The project included construction of a 3 mil- County lion-gallon ground storage tank and associated improvements, with nearly 2,000 lineal feet of REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE reclaimed water line.The project also included • Palm Bay Water Master Plan & Hydraulic construction of an interconnection between Modeling,City of Palm Bay, FL. Design Team the Seven Springs reclaimed system and the Member.Wade Trim used WaterGEMS along neighboring Pasco County reclaimed system for with field measurements in the City's water wet weather disposal, which included approx- system to establish a transient model of the imately 3,000 lineal feet of reclaimed main City's water distribution system. Future devel- extension. opment was input in the model to simulate future demands. With the assistance of this • Wastewater Collection System Upgrades& model the City was able to establish its Five- Vacuum Sewer Improvements,City of Mar- and 10-year Capital Improvement Projects. athon, FL. Project Manager. Responsible for the upgrade, expansion, and improvements to • North Port Utilities Master Plan,City of North the City of Marathon's vacuum and low-pres- Port Utilities Department, FL. Project Engi- sure wastewater collection system. As the City neer.A utility master plan was prepared to up- experiences growth and additional connections date the CIPs to reflect the current and future to its vacuum and low-pressure collection conditions of development within the City and systems,the City turned Wade Trim to evaluate anticipated flows within the distribution and and recommend system upgrades. Dan led the collection systems. A water distribution and team to conduct an evaluation of the vacuum wastewater collection model were developed, and low-pressure system, construct a hydraulic using hydraulic software WaterGEMS and Sew- model, and outline the needed capital im- 2017-129-KB 43 MIAMI BEACH DANIEL BURDEN, PHD,PE provements to increase the functionality and and identified capital improvement projects reliability of the vacuum system, making it able required as part of due diligence. Inspections to accommodate the increased connections. and evaluations were conducted on all water and wastewater facilities, including storage • Wastewater Improvement&Vacuum Collec- tanks, pumping stations, lift stations, and water tion Program, Islamorada,Village of Islands, supply wells. FL.Technical Review Team Member.The proj- ect was a $100M Design-Build-Operate central- ized wastewater collection system under con- struction in the Village of Islamorada. Engineer- ing plan reviews completed for vacuum sewer collection systems and low-pressure collection sewer systems designed for construction in the Village service area. Additional evaluations have been completed for alternative collection systems located in isolated areas. Responsibili- ties also include development of Village Utility Policy Manual, Minimum Design and Construc- tion Standards and Specifications, and Grinder Pump Specifications for DBO contract docu- ments. • South County Wastewater Improvement Program,Sarasota County Utilities, FL. Project Manager. Preparation of a wastewater man- agement improvement program for the south- ern portion of Sarasota County which contains approximately 20,000 parcels being served by onsite wastewater treatment systems.The focus of this program is directed toward the evaluation of surface water quality and the im- pacts received from substandard onsite septic systems. The program goal is to develop a plan for the replacement or upgrading of substan- dard septic systems based on a prioritization of project areas and estimated capital costs.Vac- uum sewers and other collection methods will be compared with conventional gravity systems for capital and O&M costs. • Plantation Bay Utility Acquisition, Flagler County/City of Bunnell, FL. Project Engi- neer. Engineering due diligence of the water and wastewater utility assets at Plantation Bay Utility, as part of the Flagler County and City of Bunnell acquisition. Conducted field inspections, facility evaluations, review of pertinent operation and compliance records, 2017-129-KB 44 MIAMI BEACH NATALIE SHABER, PE ROLE Water&Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer dersized road-way cross-drain in a residential neighborhood. EDUCATION BSc. Environmental Engineering, University of • Marion County Watershed Management Central Florida Plans, Marion County Board of County Commissioners.Water Resources Engineer. REGISTRATION Responsible for engi-neering analysis on a Professional Engineer: FL comprehensive watershed management plan for the improvement of flood-ing and water QUALIFICATIONS quality issues for a 300 square-mile area of > 2 years of experience on large watershed man- eastern Marion County. Project included agement, commercial, and residential project- hydrologic and hydraulic models and floodplain design delineation. > 7 years providing technical guidance to the en- gineering consulting community, and the reg- ulated public towards meeting State of Florida Environmental Resource Permitting regulations and Brevard County Code > 9 years of experience in stormwater manage- ment best management design and implemen- tation REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Alachua County Stormwater Master Plan, Alachua County, FL.Water Resources Engi- neer. Responsible for the development of the Alachua County stormwater master plan.Tasks included a countywide hydrologic and hydrau- lic model using AdICPR; consolidation of field investigation data with various source data into Arc Hydro to delineate basins within water- sheds; param-eterize the H&H model including all nodes and links within each basin; perform quality check of model parameters. Production of the Master Plan report using ArcGIS to illus- trate geo-location of hydraulic nodes and links represented in the H&H model. Participation in a public involvement program including public meetings, newsletters, and County Board meetings with the objective of determining the necessity and funding of a stormwater utility in Alachua County. • Chisholm Trail Culvert Stormwater Im- prove-ments, Lake County, FL.Water Re- sources Engineer. Responsible for engineering analysis including field reconnaissance, and H&H model-ing for the permitting application package on a retrofit project to upgrade an un- 2017-129-KB 45 MIAMI BEACH Experience&Qualifications(continued) 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY Wade Trim has contacted Dun& Bradstreet and requested they send the Supplier Qualifier Report (SQR) to the City of Miami Beach. Please find receipt below. Order Summary Page 1 of 1 Help I Home -, Dun & Bradstreet Government Solutions dun bradstree Contractor Management Portal o tal Li View Registration Status I Find Your Company D&B Supplier Certification Receipt Date Time Company D-U-N-S Product Cost 03- 11:22:09 WADE 039866249 Supplier Sub $91.95 28- TRIM Portal Total 2017 GROUP, Registration INC. Product- Yearly Tax $0.00 Total Cost $91.95 For further information or clarification Please contact our Customer Resource Group by clicking on the Customer Support link at the bottom of the page. Print Back To progress through the portal, Powered bye use theavailable a a table navi9 ation Customer Support Privacy Policy Help buttons.Do not use the back or forward buttons on your browser window https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servletJSpRegistrationReceiptV iew?tang... 3/28/2017 2017-129-KB 46 MIAMI BEACH , S , . y .. r : N' p • �f 1 • - « � y, s! •�/_��i*,,:"., \ » :Y. fir,,<",y:t, R O W •'Dsz ,.. .. 4 - 4I44 .,a:::.^�yi _ g ayaA"? r' 4,„,,,,,„„...,......„ Y, k� .f�t t •... fa��i..r.r.. , 4., ....... 11'1 i MI a ,k,1 ;0 ,.,,, . 4'. cj:--i:" ..... ,i u ~ass 1 OM A. iu .''''.'' - 4-- , , ..- -,,.,___ .,,,,.....4r ..,,,. ..,._ ypy a ; "�?! P9f .: yan�'H"y.,.,xr',w ,71.1,4`: ' t , , �%�!'moi�'">�1n,'; �'wr �.,..� a hi• O.'toil' lei . .- illIllIll 1111 ■ /d�: ..,'.,p: a/"',7'X p!,RR��y,. � .r'"IY'u,q :.. .. _ , 1 —:. ', i ...II ille ter,,, • 4 y o i, M1 r 777 -;•••.%„4,..,,,--'-..,•,.."—...„."----,,,',.: ..„,....","'"4" m.. • APPROACH & METHODOLOGY d. — 41 11111)1111 11,111111111,9111filimPol it.f/' tz'at' ' - ,N, ,I A, .y. S :•v.�i .�.,.., .... ,, '.„," „^'R � ... .» ... ,..,.,..,... m.r.Ywreww..,,,...,.r...., .w✓.arrw.w.. , , �.: ~ _ „, , �♦ F1' ,, �Junction.Fire f (Available)� Yea ,, • + i \'''Wli 4 • '1'4 '' is:, " \ Y,,,, 1. r �kvJ/ f"1"� i.. 'k�!' �Q • �\ I +............. , D :f I'e r.•,,'7,7 4 * "7;i m.. i air a a• / .-y <= 750 .. 1 -disk ..............._., ..... .?All" • <- 1,000tEl r A "✓ // {r'I, , j ����,p w 1,",'.--r-,,,v.,,;--,,./ rP • <-. 2.000 Mp:; $Aw" ,d"" ,�„'�y,r.' "✓+ q Y � �,• k '''''''1,011'S :1\� cY " • 2,500 - _":,, '`� :.'w • Other , -......1:74,` -' - t �'•C. , j +fiv� a:lr s.�,. -. » ` 4 ` • � • 1 ..t m ,�.�^t ,t� ', xs,.4 �-. ��x\ ���+•""� q, 'r .,i.. ...„......4.4..-4,.. it .:Mnrw rrrrmir'mp'r ..„,,,,,,4 /, /, Technical Approach to Wastewater Pump Station Design Please see Exhibit 3.1.2 on page 49 for a detailed iz, ,N.k xh. rt .. '-* technical approach for wastewater pump station N , , _, . . '' a design. ,,,),: ,i ..... ( ,,,,,, i, , i''''- r ' . -II, {P x u Technical Approach for Sanitary Sewer _ ` tri t Master Planning Please see Exhibit 3.1.3 on page 50 for a detailed APPROACH & METHODOLOGY technical approach for sanitary sewer master plan- ning. Wade Trim is a full-service,consulting engineering Technical Approach for Water Distribution firm that provides day-to-day design and construction Master Planning engineering services to support municipal projects as Please see Exhibit 3.1.4 on page 51 for a detailed well as a full array of more specialized services. Under technical approach for water distribution master this procurement we would focus our efforts on the planning. areas of qualification such as water supply,treatment and distribution; sewage collection, treatment,and disposal; utility relocations; reclaimed water trans- mission and distribution;stormwater handling and facilities; and highways and streets. Wade Trim also provides several civil engineering support services in- house, including electrical and instrumentation, HVAC, structural, and planning/GIS.Through the delivery of such services,on an as-needed basis, our goal is to become the City's trusted advisor. PROJECT APPROACH Technical Approaches—Critical Issue Solutions Wade Trim understands that each project type has specific needs. Delivering the technical part of proj- ects must be approached using different staff,tech- nical theories, and problem-solving techniques. Each project type also has specific and common critical issues that must be considered. Specific critical issues have been considered in each of our technical ap- proaches. The following technical approaches detail our thoughts in addressing the challenges associated with each type of project. Technical Approach for Water& Wastewater Transmission Systems Please see Exhibit 3.1.1 on page 48 for a detailed technical approach for water and wastewater trans- mission systems. 2017-129—KB 47 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.1-Technical Approach for Water&Wastewater Transmission Systems The successful design of water and wastewater Design Survey transmission systems starts with a sound technical We propose to obtain and provide a complete topo approach. In our technical approach for the design of survey of the right-of-way within the project limits. a either one of these conveyance systems,we will en- sure the City of Miami Beach's needs and expectations Geotechnical Investigation are well-understood and well-documented.To that Wade Trim will obtain the services of a local geotech- end,we will meet with the City and Miami-Dade Water nical firm with first-hand knowledge of Miami Beach and Sewer Department(WASD)to make sure we un- project areas to perform soil investigations.This infor- derstand its"big picture"goals and expectations. We mation will be used in establishing the final vertical would like to discuss the project needs with all stake- grade of the system. holders, City leadership, and O&M staff.Thereafter,we will start the development of the criteria for design. Septic Field & Well Location Investigations We will make sure we hold "roundtable" meetings and We will conduct a review of the records available rela- workshop discussions throughout the planning and tive to the location and limits of any existing wells and design process. septic fields throughout the alignment. Our approach includes effort to meet with affected stakeholders to Design Layout request their assistance relative to identifying the lo- The first step in every water and wastewater trans- cation and limits of the existing wells and septic fields mission project is to identify a preliminary conceptual within their respective property. Our meetings with layout of the transmission line from beginning to the residents will further include discussions as to their end. During the preparation of such a layout, areas of preferred locations for the service leads.A prime focus concern will be identified as well as the impact pro- of our proposed effort includes establishing and main- posed construction methods and alignment will have taining a strong working relationship with the affected throughout the area.The depth and alignment of the residents throughout the entire design/construction transmission system is dictated by existing system process. elevations and tie-in points, variable grades through- out the area,the aggressive ground found in Florida, Preliminary Plans, Bid Items & Cost Estimate capacity of the existing pump station system, envi- We will prepare preliminary alignment drawings for ronmentally sensitive areas, and coordination efforts the proposed utility improvements.The sanitary between the City and the residents. Once completed, and water transmission plan sheets will consist of a the preliminary layout will be presented to the City for plan view and a profile view,where needed. Existing its approval. Review meetings will be held with City and proposed utility information will be included on staff and other stakeholders as necessary to get buy-in the preliminary plans. We will meet with the City to of the alignment. discuss preliminary alignment drawings. Once deemed feasible,we will schedule and prepare meetings with Pre-Design Meetings additional stakeholders.A preliminary bid item list, We will conduct a pre-design meeting with the City to cost estimate, and preliminary specifications will be discuss and establish the concept and review the pro- prepared and submitted to the City for review and posed schedule and staging of the project. We will also conceptual approval. request a pre-design meeting with other stakeholders to discuss the proposed alignment. Meeting minutes Final Documents will be prepared and distributed to the necessary par- Upon approval of the preliminary plans and construc- ties, including the City and all attendees. tion items,detailed construction plans will be prepared and submitted to the City and Miami-Dade WASD Existing Utilities for review and approval for issuance to the permit- We will notify utility agencies of the proposed con- ting agencies. If necessary, adjustments will be made struction and request information on their existing prior to bidding. Upon approval from all agencies, utilities within the project limits. Plans of the proposed final plans, specifications, contract documents, and improvements will be submitted to the affected utility estimates of quantities and cost will be prepared and companies for their review and comment. submitted to the City.This work will be performed in accordance with our standard project approach. 2017429-KB 48 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.2-Technical Approach to Pump Station Design The thought process involved in and the formalized Pump equipment layout technical approach to the design of pumping are de- • Pipeline orientation scribed as follows. • Structural consideration • Architectural treatment Organization & Control of the Design Process Piping and instrumentation diagrams (p&ids) The development of a well-organized plan to com- • Preliminary sketches plete the work is fundamental to the design process. • Design memorandums/reports Last-minute changes in the project direction can be avoided by first thinking through and formalizing the Detailed Design individual steps required to complete the assignment. As soon as the detailed design is authorized by the City, Project activities usually fall into three stages during the production of final construction documents will the design process: preliminary engineering, detail begin.At this juncture—before the final design is initi- layout, and detail design. ated—presumably the site selection is completed,the property has been acquired,the force main route is as- Preliminary Engineering sured, right-of-ways(both temporary and permanent) The purpose of preliminary engineering is to gather are being secured, required permits are being obtained, the information necessary to perform the design. If and all legal impediment—including public hearings—are this exercise is properly executed, all the information being resolved. Before the final drawings can be pre- required to complete the detail design will be avail- pared,the following steps must be completed: able for easy access.The information gathered will be Refinement of hydraulics calculation used to establish such things as: Finalizing equipment selection The best site, considering all factors Update and revise the P&IDs The type of pumping station and pumps Complete detail layout sketches to show final The type of drivers, constant or variable speed dimensions The need for, and type of, standby power Initiate final production of contract documents The type of construction, submersible or wet well/ Bring quality assurance program into effect dry well facility Final document cross-check Extent of automation, control, and data recording and transmission Water Pumping System Design Force main route and profile Water pumping station falls into five general catego- Auxiliary systems such as cranes and chlorination/ ries or systems: odor control Source, such as well pumps, discharging into an Aesthetics considerations—As the sensitivity elevated tank of sites to environmental conditions increases Raw water pumps from source water provisions for architectural treatment, odor and In-line booster pumps into an elevated tank noise control, landscaping and similar concerns High-service pumping of finished water at high pressure have to be effectively addressed. Distribution system booster without storage tank Detailed Layout in the piping system If the preliminary engineering stage is done properly, Water pumping stations are then all the information and tools to put the project p p g fundamentally different from wastewater pumping stations because they do together should be readily available.At that point,the not have to be sized to pump high peak flows rates. only thing remaining are the details that will make it But a water pump station can be designed to operate perform successfully. In general, the details are specif- a very large water storage reservoir in the system. is items such as: And the demand in a water system is a combination of Pump sump design customer's needs and fire flow requirements. 2017-129-KB 49 MIAMI BEACH Approach& Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.3-Technical Approach for Sanitary Sewer Master Planning Sanitary Sewer Master Plans(SSMPs) must be devel- existing conditions. Results from the model are used to oped in stages to understand the behavior of both the identify deficiencies within the existing system. Future existing and future collection system. This separation expansion and improvements to the collection system is required because history has shown that existing will address these deficiencies as a high priority. systems using older construction techniques have different flow characteristics than systems constructed Step 5: Expand the Model to Future Conditions with modern techniques. The model of the existing system can now be expand- ed to include future growth of the community. Using Development of an SSMP centers around a computer the 10 states standards or other City-required criteria, model of the system that is used to simulate design design inflow rates for future growth in residential and inflows to the system.The model includes the design industrial areas must first be established. In residen- inflows (hydrology)to the system and the conveyance tial areas, an average daily flow of 100 gal/cap/day is of the flow through the system (hydraulics). multiplied by a peaking factor ranging from 2.0 to 4.5, based on the tributary population to a given point in Below are the steps required for the development and the system. In industrial areas, a value of 940 gal/acre/ use of an SSMP model. day is commonly used, with a peaking factor of 2.5. Step 1: Establish Drainage Boundaries Step 6: System Improvements to Meet Using available zoning maps and GIS information,the Current and Future Demands community is divided into smaller subareas.The break- Based on the needs of the existing system and the fu- down of the subareas respects both the existing and ture inflows resulting from growth in the community, future branching network of the sanitary sewer system. the existing conditions model is expanded to meet the Land-use characteristics are assigned to each subarea needs of the growing community. to understand the inflow properties of the system. Ultimate development of the future system design is Step 2: Collect Flow Meter Data of Existing usually phased in under a number of smaller proj- System ects. Initial projects are generally oriented to correct Flow meters must be installed in the existing collec- deficiencies within the existing system first while tion system to establish the current flow character- providing the flexibility to meet the future build out istics of the system. Data collected at these meters demands. Latter projects are oriented to meet sew- will be analyzed and used for projecting design flow er capacity demands as the community grows and conditions in the existing system and for establishing expands. Each project must be designed with the flexi- base flows. bility to accommodate future expansion of the system to meet ultimate build out conditions. Step 3: Develop Hydraulic Model of Existing System Using record drawings, a model of the existing san- itary sewer collection system can be developed. Information required for the model includes pipe sizes and lengths, pipe invert elevations, ground elevations, diversion chambers, weirs, equalization basins, pump stations, and overflow locations. Step 4: Existing Conditions Model Simulations Using the design inflow rates established in Step 2,the model is run under steady state conditions to simulate 2017-129-KB 50 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.4-Technical Approach for Water Distribution Master Planning Water distribution master plans for communities Using the existing model, deficiencies within the ex- involve a multi-step process that includes an assess- isting system can be identified.These deficiencies will ment of the demands of the existing system, metering be addressed during the design phase to meet future and testing, model development, projection of future water demands. needs, and evaluation of improvements to meet cur- rent and future needs. Step 4: System Improvements to Meet Cur- rent and Future Demands Step 1: Establish Baseline Conditions Based on community master plans for future build-out Using record drawings,the physical extent of the exist- conditions, the existing conditions model is expanded ing water distribution system can be determined.This to meet the needs of the growing community. Un- information generally includes pipe sizes and lengths, less the municipality requires other criteria, Wade junctions within the system, topography of the Trim generally designs system based on average daily community, locations of water inputs to the system, demand (ADD) of 100 gal/cap/day for residential pressure control devices, and land use characteristics. customers and 940 gal/cap/day for industrial custom- ers.The maximum daily demand (MDD) assumes a Step 2: Data Collection, Testing, and Metering peaking factor of 2.2 times the ADD. Data collection of the existing system is vital to es- tablishing the needs and deficiencies of the existing Final design of the system must meet MDD while main- system. Current water consumption is determined taining a pressure of 40 psi throughout the system.The directly from billing records. Using billing records, system must also have the fire flow capacity to deliver the average daily demand can be established. Using 1,000 gpm during MDD at a pressure of 20 psi. the average daily demand as a basis,the maximum daily demand can be estimated based on a generally Ultimate development of the future system design accepted peaking factor of 2.2. If required,the max- is usually phased in under a number of smaller proj- imum hourly demand can also be estimated using a ects. Initial projects are generally oriented to correct generally accepted peaking factor of 4.0. deficiencies within the existing system while providing Additional data for the system is based on the results the flexibility to meet the future build-out demands. from hydrant testing.These tests measure both the Latter projects are oriented to meet water demands as static pressure within the system as well as the resid- the community grows and expands. Each project must ual pressure within the system under fire flow condi- be designed with the flexibility to accommodate future tions. Data collected from these tests are later used expansion of the system to meet ultimate build out for model calibration. conditions. Step 3: Model Development Wade Trim uses the WaterCad or WaterGems model developed by Hasted Methods as the model frame- work to evaluate water distribution systems. Using the information collected in Step 1,the physical aspects of the existing system are input into the model. Also required for the model are the water inflow and consumption, which are based on the analysis of billing records performed in Step 2.The model is then calibrated based on the data collected during fire flow hydrant testing. 2017-129-KB 51 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN techniques. However, there are base fundamentals The nature of the work described in the scope of ser- that we use when we approach each project, including vices includes having Wade Trim provide assistance, on project management, proper resource allocation, a a continuing contract basis, to complete a multitude of prescriptive project delivery system, a strong quality engineering projects.These projects are to have pro- assurance/quality control program, stringent schedule fessional fees at a level where response time will need and budget controls, ensuring project value, and com- to be quick and projects delivered in a manner to keep munity awareness. costs to a minimum. Our intent is to remain flexible in our approach byadjustingboth CONTINUiNG SERVICES CONTRACT pp t the type and level of service to meet the City's changing project needs, EXPERIENCE keeping the overall goals of Miami Beach in mind. Wade Trim's ability to provide successful continuing services contracts stems from our programmatic ap- Our approach is to work together with City staff to proach to delivering related services. Our experience achieve the common goal of delivering successful shows that for us to be successful, all of our projects products. We will provide individual proposals for each should be successful, meaning Wade Trim will not only project our office is requested to be involved in.This understand the projects on which we are working, but will provide Miami Beach with a clear understanding we will also stay abreast of other City projects, since of the scope, project cost, and schedule required to they relate to the overall capital program the City complete each project. In the paragraphs that follow, delivers.This programmatic delivery approach on con- we describe our project approach to several services tinuing services contracts ensures all City projects will to give you an understanding of how we work with our be well coordinated BEFORE a shovel of dirt is turned. clients to complete a project. Each of our methodolo- gies proposed can be altered to better suit the needs Our success in delivering continuing services contracts of the City. is highlighted by the number of continuing services contracts we currently hold with other entities around The City of Miami Beach desires to implement "task the state of Florida. In most cases,these contracts order"-type projects to resolve issues quickly and have been held for several years, and their options cost-effectively when they arise in the City's ever grow- to extend for additional terms have been exercised ing utility system and ever changing regulatory require- numerous times. Exhibit 3.1.5 on the following page is ments. The project types contained in the RFQ must be an abbreviated list of Wade Trim's continuing services addressed to provide a product that satisfies the needs contracts for the State of Florida and the date in which and expectations of Miami Beach relative to lower we started with the municipality. capital and life cycle costs, and enhanced operation efficiency, along with a reduction in overall mainte- nance requirements. Special attention will also be paid to safety in all aspects of the designs that incorporate smoothly in the land use of the surrounding area. A clear, well-defined approach integrated into a proven project management program will successfully deliver these Miami Beach projects. Wade Trim understands that each project has specific needs, depending on the project type. Delivering the technical part of projects must be approached using different staff,technical theories, and problem-solving 2017-129-KB 52 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.5-Wade Trim Continuing Engineering Services Experience YEAR III. CONTRACT PLANNING/ CONSTRUCTION BEGAN ANALYSIS DESIGN PERMITTING ASSISTANCE City of Tampa 1998 Florida Governmental 2001 .0 .0 ,, ,, Utility Authority City of Palm Bay Utilities Department 2005 ,, ,, North Key Largo Utility Corporation 2006 ,, Citrus County Utilities Department 2006 Manatee County 2007 Pinellas County Utilities 2010 .0 .0 .0 ,, Brevard County Barefoot Bay Water 2010 .0 .0 ,, ,, & Sewer District City of Dunedin 2011 City of Cocoa Utilities Department 2012 ,, Brevard County Utility Services 2012 .0 v Department Hillsborough County Public 2012 .0 .0 .0 ., Utilities Department City of Palmetto 2013 .0 .0 ko City of West Melbourne 2013 ,, ,, City of North Port 2014 Town of Winder- 2014 ere City of Marathon 2015 v .0 ,, ,, City of Miami Beach 2015 .0 .0 ,, ,, City of Port Orange 2015 .0 .0 .0 ,, 2017-129-KB 53 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) SCHEDULE & BUDGET MANAGE- staff properly allocated to the project will provide MENT THROUGH EFFECTIVE PROJECT technical solutions the City can stand behind, as well as meet the budgets established at the beginning of MANAGEMENT the effort. The success of a project begins with leadership. Our project management process is interactive and in- We will allocate resources to focus the majority of cludes sharing information, building relationships, the effort on the technical portion of a project. Being involving affected parties, and creating a vision. It in- local, our management and administration staff have cludes tasks such as organization, communication, doc- other local projects they are working on, allowing us to umentation, scheduling, establishing and monitoring spend only time that's needed on a certain project. In budgets, ensuring quality control and, when necessary, light of this, our typical staff allocation on projects of conflict resolution. We have used this process on all this type is: types of projects similar to those in the City's RFQ. Project Management(Managerial) 10% Technical 75% Holly Kremers, PE,will serve as our Project Manager Administrative Support(Administrative) 10% and be the primary contact person between the City of Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5% Miami Beach and our team. Her hands-on leadership will provide continuity as projects progress from ideas Once a scope of work is identified, Wade Trim will to construction and start-up to commissioning. Holly allocate needed staff, matching project needs with staff will be responsible for scheduling, budgeting, conduct- skills. Using our local talent pool, combined with our ing, and documenting client meetings. She will prepare national staff,we will assign the best available staff to and monitor all project schedules and budgets, and the project. As staff is brought into the area to com- provide monthly status reports to the City. Holly will plete the work,Wade Trim will NOT put this cost on the plan, implement, and document our quality assurance project and will NOT pass this expense to Miami Beach. procedures. Project Delivery Plan The first and most fundamental step in an assign- Wade Trim follows a prescriptive project delivery plan ment-based contract is project accountability of team in our approach to every project. We approach our members.Team members must fully and clearly under- projects by dividing the delivery plan into eight tasks stand what is expected of their work,themselves, and that are clearly defined, scheduled, and monitored as how their activities relate to the overall project scope the work progresses. and schedule. Project assignments will need quick re- sponse times with aggressive budgets.To develop and Task 1: Data Collection/Evaluation—Collect and evalu- maintain project accountability of our team members, ate available data on the various elements of the work. Wade Trim prepares a comprehensive communication plan designed to identify responsibilities, reporting Task 2:Technical Memorandum—Develop and evalu- requirements, and performance monitoring. Once ate the pros and cons of project alternatives consider- these responsibilities are established, monthly prog- ing constructability, current equipment conditions, and ress meetings will be held with appropriate members current O&M issues. of the team to monitor progress and keep design team members accountable for the work. Task 3: Site Plan Development—After conceptual development, a site plan will be developed that com- Resource Allocation municates the solutions to Miami Beach, regulatory The Wade Trim Team has a diverse and local talent agencies, and other stakeholders. base. Our staff expertise and previous work experience in Florida and on the national level allow us to assign the best-suited staff to each project. Having the right 2017-129-KB 54 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Task 4: Project Design—Plan development at 30%, designed to fine-tune specific technical skills, as well as 60%, 90%, and final completion. At each of these mile- keep them current with our industry. stones, construction estimates will be prepared. Project Value Task 5: Permitting—Identify needed permits and assist At the project level,value can be measured under Miami Beach in obtaining the same. three separate categories: 1.Value of short-/long-term operation and Task 6: Bidding& Procurement—Prepare bid docu- maintenance costs ments and provide post-bid award recommendations. 2.Value of a completed project's life expectancy Y 3.Value of the overall capital investment(constructing Task 7: Construction Management—Provide a proven more than just the "bare bones") proactive, problem avoidance, construction system that delivers a quality project within project budgets While each category is independent, it is the combina- and schedule. tion of these that defines a project's overall value and the delivery of a project meeting the owner's expecta- Task 8: Final Report—A project close-out report and tions. the submittal of project files and deliverables will be provided to Miami Beach as the final project action. Vital to establishing and understanding value is effec- tive communication between the design team and the Our work plan for each task is designed to facilitate owner. In the assignment of a project's value, Miami the development and implementation of an effective Beach staff is key to project success.Their knowledge task-specific work plan. Based on the information of operation and maintenance skills and needs, cost of available and the work completed to date on a project, capital and its proper impact, and long-term vision for some of the steps described above could be eliminated. improvements are necessary for the completed work to reflect the most value for the City's investment. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Wade Trim's Quality Control program is a continuous Our team uses proven methods to include Miami process that begins with the Project Manager, our Beach staff in the design and construction that min- individual responsible for quality on the project. Senior imizes their time and maximizes their input. Every level managers and officers of Wade Trim will support successful project begins with a solid execution plan, our Project Manager. Depending on the project type clearly understood by all project team members.The being worked on, we will match senior level staff ex- level of effort required and project outcome reflect pertise with project type to ensure the most complete the quality of the plan. When stakeholders participate review of our deliverables. in the initial planning stages of a project,they take ownership. Our team will use a technique called "in- Quali ControlAs noted earlier, Wade Trim teractive planning"that we have used on many of our RECORD DOCUMENT typically commits 5%of a proj- projects. Input is solicited in a single, initial meeting, Checkeci. Data ect's total budget to Quality simultaneously from staff from operations, mainte- eackciuf Datta carrecte4. p,tor Control. However, this only nance, design, construction, and other departments. Vet If 44 Datta represents our efforts during 101 WADETRI.M our formal in-house review To clearly portray project design issues, we will use meetings. Our quality control Three-Dimensional CAD.Through this method, equip- program goes significantly further than this, starting ment layouts and potential conflicts are found prior with the staff themselves. We ensure staff have the to construction.Typically, drawings allow the end user necessary technical resources to perform the work as and project team to visualize the completed project well as the right background and work experience. Our and amenities.This tool can assist the team in laying staff have extensive in-house and out-of-house training out equipment and utilities to reduce project conflicts 2017-129-KB 55 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) and facilitate future operation and maintenance needs, Ongoing communication with Miami Beach leadership thereby reducing O&M costs—an important value for is a critical component with public infrastructure proj- any client. It is this type of interaction that defines a ects. City leaders are often the first point of contact for project's value and helps the team deliver a project the public with questions or concerns regarding their with the most value for the City's investment. projects.These leaders must be briefed on a regular basis to have the knowledge needed to respond in an Community Awareness informed and responsible manner.These briefings may The success of projects often hinges on the education take the form of presentations, progress reports, or and understanding of the general public and other goy- one-on-one meetings.The exact nature of the brief- ernmental and regulatory agencies regarding the need ings will be determined on a project and issue-specific for the project and the proposed solution. Well-inten- basis. boned projects without adequate public education and understanding are easily derailed based on fears or Wade Trim has developed a wide range of innovative misunderstandings. One of the primary values of the public information processes and printed and digital Wade Trim team is to ensure there is full and diverse communications for public infrastructure projects and public participation and education in the development issues. From public information brochures to extensive of all of our projects.The extent of the public involve- project information websites, Wade Trim will assist ment process is dependent upon the specific projects Miami Beach in presenting technical information in and related issues. Contact with the citizens and prop- understandable terms. Wade Trim provides multime- erty owners could take the form of phone calls, mail dia services including 3-D animation, video production, outs, or community meetings, depending upon the and interactive media services to aid in the interactive specific project issues. design process, and will aid Miami Beach in communi- cating its project information with larger audiences. Community awareness needs to focus on public edu- cation and understanding as much as public feedback. The Wade Trim Project Team will work with Miami A well-educated and aware citizenry ensures that Beach to actively inform and involve the public, press, decisions are reached for the overall public good of and other governmental or regulatory agencies in the community as opposed to individualistic or selfish projects through thorough and inclusive communi- motives. ty awareness and public information programs.This allows the Project Team to assist the City in finding an approach to reach these audiences and developing Y, _ } ...M materials that convey technical information in under- ' nder- standable terms.The public involvement process will be tailored to the specific project and specific issues and will strive to inform the public and stakeholders to •41114" N "Stensure successful projects. Self-Performed Scope ofServices Wade Trim prides itself on the level of service we pro- vide our clients.As a full-service engineering firm, we have the ability and technical resources to provide all of the services denoted in Exhibit 3.1.6 on the follow- +,.. ing page. Wade Trim uses public meetings to ensure stakeholder involvement in projects. 2017-129-KB 56 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) All staff listed in our organizational chart are Flori- Using regularly scheduled staffing discussions, our da-based Wade Trim employees who will be delivering Project Managers formally meet and discuss existing all of the services under this contract. Should addition- staffing demands on our workload.This discussion al staff be required to deliver the scope of work, our projects our existing and future workload over a local team will request assistance from our employees 12-month period to ensure both current contracts and located in our 19 regional offices. those being pursued will be adequately staffed.This Exhibit 3.1.6 -Wade Trim Services effort is then coordinated at our corporate level so that staff throughout the organization can cover all the Water System Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) work when needed, to ensure ALL project schedules Development are met.This proactive process determines the need Wastewater Collection System CIP Development for additional staff and changes can be made promptly Water/Wastewater System Master Planning while schedules are not adversely impacted. Water/Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling Water/Wastewater System Construction Design Schedule Wastewater Pump Station Design Wade Trim has a variety of schedule tools, which pro- ConstructionValue Engineering vide a "roadmap" for the individual project or collec- Water/Wastewater Studies and Reports tion of work assignments. These schedules range from simple bar charts to fully loaded cost and resource loaded CPM schedules.The tools we have available to Workload us include Microsoft Project, Primavera P6, and Prima- The members of the Wade Trim Team have immediate vera Contract Manager. project availability, and we understand how to work within the challenges of continuing services-type con- Wade Trim will maintain schedule control through early tracts. Our availability and knowledge of the delivery planning of the complete work assignment,followed by process and project types uniquely positions us to detailed schedules for management approvals and per- assist Miami Beach with its projects, since we under- mits, engineering, procurement, construction, pre-op- stand the project scope, have been actively identifying erational testing, and preliminary operation.A baseline and resolving similar project challenges on our other schedule is developed as the overall project schedule. projects, and have a delivery team ready to move Short duration look-ahead schedules are developed to forward. schedule and sequence daily work activities. Our staffing plan includes our Project Manager and The project baseline schedule activities are reviewed support staff primarily dedicated to the City's projects monthly and deviations from the schedule are iden- from concept through design until the completion tified. Actions needed to correct the deviations are of construction to ensure that a condensed,focused immediately developed and implemented to maintain team will keep design fees at a minimum while project overall project schedule. Progress is reported to the schedule milestones are met. If further support is need- City in a monthly progress report, along with identified ed and specialized resources need to be called upon, deviations and corrective actions taken. we will mobilize the best available resources from our national pool of more than 400 professionals. If these Please see Exhibit 3.1.7 on the following page for a professionals travel to Miami Beach to support this sample project schedule. project, the City will NOT be charged any travel time or associated expenses. 2017-129-KB 57 MIAMI BEACH Approach&Methodology(continued) Exhibit 3.1.7 -Sample Project Schedule ID i Task Name 3 Duration f Start Finish ;2016 2Q11__ 2918 IO 0160tr 3,20160tr 4,2016Qtr 1,2017Qtr 2,2017Qtr 3,2017Qtr 4,20170tr 1,201&Qtr 2,2018 Qtr 3 un Jul Au poctN ecJanFQhMar rMay,JurkJul�4uQSeaOct.No‘Oec lanFealalAprMa:. , 1 ? SB Clarifiers and Chem Feed 749 days Fri 6/24/16 Thu 7/12/18; ,4 t E ' 2 IV Task Order Preparation 49 days Fri 6/24/16 Thu 8/11/161 11191 t 3 4`f Task Order Preparation 49 days Fri 6/24/16 Thu 8/11/16 _. , i : 4 Engineering 265 days Thu 8/11/16 Wed 5/3/171 t : t 5 r/ Notice to Proceed(Engineering) 0 days Thu 8/11/16 Thu 8/11/16; t 11/11 F t E : 6 60%Design 84 days Fri 8/12/16 Thu 11/3/16 E ; ' i : , 7 Design Review 48 days Fri 11/4/16 Wed 12/21/16 &Eh t F 8 90%Design 51 days Thu 12/22/16 Fri 2/10/17t F t , t i F , t t 9 E Design Review 25 days Sat 2/11/17 Tue 3/7/17! t - F : t • i t : , , 10 100%Design(100%Plans and Specs) 36 days; Wed 3/8/17 Wed 4/12/17; F : t : t t k 1 : t , E s E t E , 11 € Design Review 7 days Thu 4/13/17 Wed 4/19/17 t t : F t ' • t . 12 ; Final Design 14 days Thu 4/20/17 Wed 5/3/17 ; ,.. $ ;FI i , F t l 13 Engineering Complete 0 days Wed 5/3/17 Wed 5/3/17, t F F 5/3 , t F q t . — i t ! F F 14 Bidding i 255 days Thu 5/4/17 Sat 1/13/18! F t t , , t ! t ! : ; 15 i Assemble Bid,Advertise,and Open i 90 days Thu 5/4/17 Tue 8/1/17 t t t , i t t • - t 16 Contract Award Process to Pre-Con i 120 days Wed 8/2/17 Wed 11/29/17, E x i ' t t t t t t ; • 17 Pre Construction Conference t 0 days Wed 11/29/17 Wed 11/29/17 F t ; • 18 Contractor Prep Time 45 days Thu 11/30/17 Sat 1/13/18 } ' F t tt t 19 j Construction 180 days Sat 1/13/18 Thu 7/12/181 ' 20 i Notice to Proceed(Construction) 0 days Sat 1/13/18 Sat 1/13/181 ' i ! 13 t ! t ! t liminiimin'ini 21 Construction 180 days Sun 1/14/18 Thu 7/12/181 c • ; . E f F 22 Project Complete 0 days Thu 7/12/18 Thu 7/12/18; t t • Task 0111111111M1111111 Extemal Milestone • Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Task ! Manual Summary Project:Project! Milestone ♦ Inactive Milestone , Start-only [ Date:Tue 3/7/17 Summary Inactive Summary c.1 a_1 Finish-only ] Project Summary - Manual Task IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Progress External Tasks Duration-only Deadline <• 2017-129-KB 58 MIAMI BEACH 7 / III WADETRBI 2100 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 970 Coral Gables, FL 33134 786.361.1645 www.wadetrim.com Florida•Illinois•Michigan•Missouri•Nebraska New York-North Carolina•Ohio•Pennsylvania•Texas