The URL can be used to link to this page

Agreement with 300 Engineering Group, P.A. 010/7-a9'gs 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND 300 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29853 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 8 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 13 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 15 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 15 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 16 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 17 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 18 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 18 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 19 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 20 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 21 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 21 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 22 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 22 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 23 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 27 SCHEDULE B 30 SCHEDULE C 31 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 32 ATTACHMENT B 42 ATTACHMENT C 43 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND 300 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 2017, (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and 300 Engineering Group, P.A., a Florida corporation having its principal office at 3850 Bird Road, Suite 601, Miami, FL 33146 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on March 22, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017- 29853, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with 300 Engineering Group, P.A. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B -Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C —Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any negligent design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations g and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City(or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use reasonable efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure, within the standard of care, the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from negligent error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance irt connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. 5.2.10 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications. Assist as needed with matters relating to stakeholder engagement and communications. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed and for Not to Exceed Consultant Service Orders; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category)for Not to Exceed Consultant Service Orders. ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 Except for Professional Liability, Workers Compensation, and Employer's Liability, the City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or non-renewal of any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees where recoverable by law, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon.Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes caused by a negligent error or omission in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City resulting from a negligent error or omission shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the negligent errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's negligent errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the negligent error or omission. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of negligent errors or omissions, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager or the City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto for purposes of the administration of the Project (and without waiving any claims or defenses of the Consultant with respect to the underlying dispute). This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SUBJECT TO CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 558.0035, FLORIDA STATUTES, A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CONSULTANT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OCCURRING WITHIN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Roy Coley, Assistant Department Director/Infrastructure Director All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: 300 Engineering Group, P.A. 3850 Bird Road, Suite 601, Miami, FL 33146 Attn: Franklin A Torrealba, PE, ENV SP Email: fatorrealbaCa�300engineering.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct negligent errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such negligent errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested • t ,---1 respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest ::�== ==---=. _,1 CITY OF MIAM EA,' -,--'';:,\ b iz3/4„,,-- --- '''',,,',-.,4\‘ ............,—,\,,A i ( ' ' -.Y{ .**-1 ..;"a. L--' 'q.)), 1,o s.. ,�� ' s yy i -I�; a' ,:..y,:. '.:4:k.,,,,...— ,N y -_, �1/I A 4,,,,, ,� - CIT CLERK _{.,� .. ,,,,,,,..--y,".„, tyy..m,- /1/7:// y �. ,, / , - , , ' 4, L-; $8, ,, 0 Di - Attest , ; ` -, _- '' to; , LT. , V'r d"'�`f •mss '�?` ��r'/^ '^+ >�►`".b f�.. ;;�, f ., 2 .. \�4 f Lj -,,;',./ng ,� �.�� , ,,f , ng a ,'ng Gr•I p, P.A. V:4r '�j+•'� �+ ae -'a ��V'a.. 16Y,tye i`' )( —' I A / &, 1 Y ) 4,-. ..C, S` '''`L'-'-`,L7 L','.:-:-x'-''''' '1 i t ,i.,,,„‘Lgi ; Sig a ecretary Sign u • i ce 're 'dent < (I")ete- IrotA TO nactle loc. Print Name f Print Name 16(q7/Z4' � (0/ZifUll APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE : FOR E ECUT1 N 7 7 ----/ stA, 4, i til __ P/2- /? OF A orney Date SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND 300 Engineering Group, P.A. The Consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its Water and Wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. Proposer shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. The services described in items I, and II are a priority and are intended to be awarded immediately. The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future. I. Develop Water System Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 1. Prepare a description, and general inventory of the water distribution system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing water distribution system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2. Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure. The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. I. Develop Wastewater Collection System CIP 1. Prepare a description, and general inventory of the wastewater collection system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing wastewater collection system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2. Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure. The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. II. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Master Planning 1. Master plans to include, but not limited to water, quality and service goals, present and future system deficiencies, engineer's recommended alternatives for achieving goals and correcting deficiencies, and recommended implementation schedule. III. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Hydraulic Modeling 1. Conduct hydraulic modeling evaluation of entire system or the specific areas required. Include the following, but not limited to, calibrate the model using field measurements and observations, prepare and submit a hydraulic model design elements report, and prepare a system capacity and expansion report. IV. Water and/or Wastewater Systems expansion and/or replacement construction design, including pumping stations 1. Provide engineer signed and sealed plans for improvements identified in the master plans, hydraulic modeling, or other needs as directed by the City of Miami Beach. Plans are to be based on good engineering practices, and performed by an engineer(s) qualified in the State of Florida to perform such work. V. Construction Management Services. 1. Provide construction management services which may include (but not be limited to): (1) assist with design development of third parties to ensure intended goals are achieved; (2) provide budget development, estimating and value engineering services; (3) assist the City with the bidding process for applicable projects; (4) assist with jurisdictional reviews and project related mitigation issues; (5) construction related activities and reviews, including pay applications; (6) project close-out and occupancy. VI. Project Studies and Reports. 1. Provide applicable project studies and reports, including (but not limited to) bond feasibility reports, construction feasibility and constructability reports, project schedules, and reports or studies required by agencies with jurisdiction over the scope of work. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: 300 Engineering Group, P.A. PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (RFQ 2017-129-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: � Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: � City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $X)00(X)(J(X Design Services* $XXXXXX KX Bidding and Award Services $XXXX)00(X Construction Administration '"""` $XXXX)OO(X Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XX)OO(X, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule .................. . .... ........... .............. ......................._... .................... ................... Water and Wastewater Systems Consultant RFQ 2017-129-KB Labor Category Hourly Rate Admin/Clerical $50.00 Administrator $85.00 Associate $188.00 CADD Manager $152.00 CADD Operator $115.00 CADD Technician $75.00 Clerk $80.00 Designer $108.00 Draftsman $72.00 Draftsperson $101.16 Engineer $134.75 Engineer/Assistant Engineer $113.00 Engineering Intern $89.00 Engineering Technician $45.00 Field Inspector $85.00 Inspector $85.00 Principal $275.75 Principal Designer $141.00 Principal Engineer $151.00 Project Engineer $165.50 Project Engineer Senior $185.50 Project Geotechnical Engineer $120.00 Project Manager $194.00 Project Manager Senior $243.69 Scientist/Assistant Scientist $88.00 Senior Associate $238.00 Senior Driller $65.00 Senior Engineer $175.00 Senior Field Coordinator $144.00 Senior Geotechnical Engineer $143.00 Senior Principal Designer $159.00 Senior Principal Engineer $172.00 Senior Principal Scientist $164.00 Staff Geotechnical Engineer $90.00 Survey Crew Member $62.32 Survey Designating Crew Member $119.55 Survey VAC Crew Member $135.05 Surveyor& Mapper $113.80 Technician $69.00 Vice President $280.00 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 1. Tetra Tech 2. D & B Engineers and Architects 3. Florida International University— Sea Level Solutions Center(SLSC) ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 2017-29853 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING IN PART THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)NO. RFQ 2017-129-KB FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER& WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH HAZEN & SAWYER, P.C., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER, TO SERVE AS THE CITY'S PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER, TO SERVE AS A CO-PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT; FURTHER, ESTABLISHING A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS, ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS, AND WITH RESPECT TO THE PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANT POOL, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH 300 ENGINEERING GROUP,P.A.,AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER;AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC.,AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER;KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND WADE TRIM, INC., AS THE SIXTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE AWARD OF ANY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE ADVANCE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, on March 22, 2017, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-129-KB for Engineering Services for Water & Wastewater Systems Projects;and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB (the "RFQ") was released on March 24,2017; and WHEREAS,a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on April 5,2017;and WHEREAS,on April 25,2017,the City received a total of 17 proposals;and WHEREAS,the Committee convened on May 2, 2017 to review and score the remaining proposals;and WHEREAS,the Committee was provided an overview of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law,general information on the scope of services,and a copy of each proposal;and WHEREAS,the Committee's ranking was as follows: Hazen &Sawyer, P.G., as the top ranked proposer; and with respect to the pool of pre-qualified consultants for specified tasks on an as-needed basis, recommended CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; 300 Engineering Group,P.A.,as the third ranked proposer,AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer;King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Wade Trim,Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer;and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's comments and rankings,the City Manager has recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen&Sawyer, P.C.,as the top ranked prime proposer to serve as the lead/prime consultant; and with respect to the pool of pre-qualified consultants for specified tasks on an as-needed basis, authorize negotiations with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; 300 Engineering Group,P.A.,as the third ranked proposer;AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer; King Engineering Associates, Inc.,as the fifth ranked proposer;and Wade Trim,Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept in part the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-129-KB for Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects;authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen&Sawyer, P.C., as the top ranked proposer,to serve as the City's Prime/Lead Consultant; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, to serve as a co-prime/lead consultant; further, establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to Water and Wastewater Projects, on an as-needed basis, and with respect to the pre-qualified consultant pool, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with 300 Engineering Group, P.A., as the third ranked proposer; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Wade Trim, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration, provided, however,that the award of any program management services shall be subject to the advance approval of the Mayor and City Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1/ day of Nay 201,. :. 7 i r"/I Philip Levine; ay' ATTEST: //,/ Jirk / Ra a Q ado, 4.+� / ,.ru u,,,,. „irk BE, APPROVED AS TO C+��i FORM&LANGUAGE �`'..-t' S' 4 &FOR EXECUTION R \R --• ,-----"--4. ----(.:-t . 6. Saa IT. I I :-Iii ?,k's -vz 3 i q [17 i co\-\ ,'�- ' City AttorneyQ Data V' ;.7 4./ .- 0) ''' litt V..'' - • ,ft Resolution.-C7 E MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: May 17,2017 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFP) NO. 2017-129-WG, FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS The City purchases treated potable water from Miami/Dade County, and resells it to its customers. There are multiple connections to the Miami/Dade County water transmission system.The City collects wastewater from its customers,including satellite cities,and conveys it to Miami/Dade County for treatment. The City provided (at its most recent count) potable water service to an estimated 10,414 domestic retail water accounts, and to approximately 2,958 irrigation (water-only) accounts. Expressed on an equivalent residential unit ("ERU") basis, the System provided service to about 29,001 domestic water ERUs and 8,443 irrigation ERUs. An ERU represents the average capacity for a single-family residential account (served by a 5/8-inch meter), and is used to measure the total customer base on an equivalent basis (how many total equivalent households are being served)since a significant number of customers may represent a single account that serves a large group of customers(e.g.,a condominium),or commercial customer that uses a large amount of water (e.g., a hospital or school). The ERUs were based on information published by the American Water Works Association regarding meter capacities, and which form the basis for the determination of meter equivalent factors. The City provided(at its most recent count)sanitary sewer service to an estimated 10,414 retail sanitary sewer accounts, and 29,001 sanitary sewer ERUs (all domestic water customers receive sanitary sewer service).The City also provides wholesale sanitary sewer to the Village of Bal Harbour, the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the City of North Village, and the Town of Surfside(collectively,the"Satellite Cities"). The City is over 100 years old, and many of his assets are believed to have been installed Page 228 of 878 during the time of its inception. Improvements,and expansions have been made throughout the City's history, and a comprehensive review of the entire water, and wastewater infrastructure needs to be performed. It is the City's intention to develop,and implement a long-term capital improvement plan to best position the community with a resilient, robust, environmentally responsible,and future proof,water,and wastewater system to serve into perpetuity. The City requested proposals from qualified firms to provide Engineering Services for Water& Wastewater Systems Projects to meet the City's needs for professional engineering services relating to its water and wastewater infrastructure improvement goals. Through the referenced RFQ,the City seeks to contract for the following: 1. Prime Consultant(s). The Prime Consultant shall act in the capacity of the City's lead consultant on its long term capital improvement projects for water and wastewater. The selected prime consultant shall provide the City with subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its water and wastewater systems. The Prime Consultant shall guide the City through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient,environmentally responsible,dependable,and future proof. 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants.Additionally,to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). RFQ PROCESS On March 22, 2017, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No.2017.129-KB for Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects. On March 24, 2017, the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on April 5, 2017. RFQ responses were due and received on April 25, 2017. The City received a total of 17 proposals.The City received proposals from the following firms: • 300 Engineering Group,P.A. • A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. • AECOM Technical Services, Inc. • CH2M Hill Engineers,Inc. • Chen Moore and Associates,Inc.. • CP H,Inc. • CPM North America PLLC • CSA Central, Inc. • Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. • HT&J,LLC • King Engineering Associates,Inc. • Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam, Inc. • Milian,Swain&Associates, Inc. • Pennoni Associates Inc. • R.J.Behar&Company,Inc. • Stantec Consulting Services Inc. • Wade Trim,Inc. On April 18,2017,the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC#206-2017. The Evaluation Committee convened on May 2, 2017, to consider proposals received. The committee was comprised of Roger Buell,Assistant City Engineer, Public Works Department, Page 229 of 878 City of Miami Beach; Roy Coley, Assistant Director/Infrastructure Director, Public Works Department, City of Miami Beach;Jay Fink,Assistant Director, Public Works Department, City of Miami Beach;Manny Marquez,Assistant Director,Finance Department,City of Miami Beach; and Margarita Wells, Acting Director, Environment & Sustainability Department, City of Miami Beach. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A,in the following order: 1. Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. 2. CH2M Hill Engineers,Inc. 3. 300 Engineering Group,P.A. 4. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 5. King Engineering Associates,Inc. 6. Wade Trim,Inc. 7. Milian,Swain&Associates, Inc. 8. A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 9. Pennoni Associates Inc. 10. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 11. Chen Moore and Associates, Inc. 12. R.J.Behar&Company, Inc. 13. C P H, Inc. 14. HT&J,LLC 15. CPM North America PLLC 16. CSA Central, Inc. 17. Lockwood,Andrews&Newnam,I nc. A summary of each top-ranked firm follows: Hazen and Sawyer According to the information provided by the firm,Hazen's focus is exclusively on water, wastewater, and stormwater engineering.We stand out amongst our peers in terms of subject matter expertise, local capital/master planning experience, and water/wastewater engineering design. I n fact, Hazen currently provides the same services required by this contract to your neighbors including: Hialeah, Homestead, North Miami,Coral Gables, North Miami Beach, and Miami-Dade Aviation Department(MDAD).By leveraging this directly applicable experience for other local coastal cities and our subject matter experts, the Hazen team will deliver a capital and master plan that is Resilient, Innovative, Sustainable,and will foster Economic Growth.We are a ready to begin work and commit to providing a prioritized capital plan immediately. CH2M yil Engineers,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,CH2M fully supports and embraces the City's goal of developing resilient, robust water and wastewater systems in an environmentally responsible manner, as embodied in Miami Beach Rising Above.Thier worldclass experience —both in South Florida and around the globe—provides the local knowledge and industry leadership that are essential for developing the water and wastewater infrastructure that will Page 230 of 878 serve the City reliably and cost-effectively for many years to come. Industry Leading Engineering Qualifications Demonstrating the world-class expertise CH2M brings to the City of Miami Beach,we have a long,consistent history of leading the industry in the provision of water and wastewater-related services. CH2M has been the country's No. 1 Sewer/Wastewater Company for 11 consecutive years, the No. 1 Pure Designer, and the No. 1 Construction Management/Program Management Company. As a practical example of the advantages that our industry leading resources and experience bring to the City of Miami Beach,the City need only look as far as Miami-Dade County, where CH2M is Owner's Agent for the $5.7 billion Ocean Outfall Legislation (OOL) Program. As Owner's Agent, CH2M is responsible for charting the future course of the County's wastewater system so that complex OOL requirements,such as rerouting wastewater flows from the east to the west,are met by 2022. 300 Engineering.Group,P.A. According to the information provided by the firm, We assembled an unparalleled team of subject matter experts with the necessary local support to better serve the needs of the City of Miami Beach and to develop and implement a long-term capital improvement plan-- with the available information and in a short period of time.We assembled a team which 1)understands your water and wastewater system vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise, 2) is willing to work 24/7 to make your system resilient, robust, environmentally responsible, and future proof,and 3)brings a fresh perspective to the City of Miami Beach. Their team consists of: Tetra Tech, a global engineering firm ranked No. 1 in Water by Engineering News-Record (ENR) for 13 consecutive years with over 16,000 employees worldwide, and 500 employees in Florida; D&B Engineers, a water and wastewater firm, operating since 1965,with expertise in underground aging infrastructure;and the FIU Sea Level Solutions Center, a group of experts in the development of adaptation strategies for communities subject to climate change/sea level rise in South East Florida,including the City of Miami Beach. This team is reliable, cohesive, efficient, and has well-established professional relationships. We have collaborated on past projects and continue to work together, achieving collective results that equate in increased client satisfaction. AECOM Technical Services.Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,AECOM has a history of performing water and wastewater utility consulting services to municipal clients throughout coastal southeastern Florida facing similar resilience and sea level rise issues as the City of Miami Beach. These clients include the Cities of North Miami Beach, Cooper City, North Miami, and Hollywood as well as Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department. AECOM has years of experience supporting Miami Beach in combating the effects of sea-level rise and evaluating opportunities to create a more resilient community. They have assisted Miami Beach in the development of the Resiliency Program, creating and executing codes and recommended actions to improve resilience;assisting in the adoption of revised ordinances;strengthening the City's programs as a part of the FEMA Community Resilience Score to reduce insurance costs; and assessment of the vulnerabilities and strengths of the CitVs assets to sea level rise. A key outcome is the Guidance Document on Sea Level Rise Vulnerability,which includes the Adaptation Decision- Making Assessment and Planning Tool(ADAPT). This tool provides the City with consolidated information and processes t0 use for building resilience strategies into City operations and capital investment decisions. Page 231 of 878 King Engineering Associates,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,King is a full-service consulting firm providing water, wastewater, and reclaimed water master planning and engineering services for governments and agencies throughout the state of Florida for 40 years. King staff has planned and designed over 500 miles of water and wastewater utility pipelines and supporting infrastructure of pump stations for municipal utilities throughout Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida. These pipelines have been constructed using a variety of methods including open cut, horizontal directional drill, micro-tunneling, jack and bore, auger boring, and subaqueous installations. Our installed pipe material has included ductile iron, PVC, HDPE, fiber glass, steel, and PCC P. King has also extensive experience in the rehabilitation of pipelines and pump stations. To upgrade and extend the useful life of pipelines we have used a variety of techniques including slip lining,pipe bursting,swage lining,folded liners,and cured in place liners. Local Firm I Local Team---King's services for assignments received under this contract will be executed from our well established Miami office which is located approximately 30 minutes away from Miami Beach. Wade Trim,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Wade Trim is proud to be a South Florida consulting engineering firm helping local and regional governments create livable, sustainable communities through practical and innovative solutions.Starting in 1926,Wade Trim completed utility designs for municipalities.As work grew in response to changing client needs, our staff and offices have expanded to nearly 400 employees in 19 offices throughout the eastern United States. Wade Trim is consistently ranked among the top design and environmental firms and continues to be nationally recognized for innovative solutions. Nearly 90% of our business is from repeat clients, a testament to our commitment to client relationships. We are excited to expand our commitment to Miami Beach in resolving its infrastructure challenges. For nearly four years,Wade Trim has been at the forefront of Miami Beach's response to climate change and sea level rise.The first neighborhood to have elevated roadways and enhanced stormwater pumping systems implemented,Sunset Harbour was designed by Wade Trim.Since that time we have designed infrastructure improvements for Palm&Hibiscus Islands and Espanola Way, and are under contract for drainage, infrastructure,and streetscape improvements in the City's high-profile 1st Street corridor. Wade Trim has not only remained on the leading edge of the City's sea level rise and resiliency technology,we have been active in educating the public and other stakeholders through presentations,technical papers,and events throughout Miami-Dade County. CQNCLUSION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Hazen & Sawyer, as the top ranked and Prime Consultant. Through its proposal and presentation to the Evaluation Committee, Hazen&Sawyer has demonstrated its capacity and experience in water and wastewater systems. The firm has been awarded and performed well on a number of related contracts. Finally, Hazen & Sawyer provided a clear and detailed approach to how its services would benefit the City, including subject matter expertise,long range planning and potential cost savings. Additionally, I recommend the following firms five (5) firms, based on the City's anticipated needs and potential volume of work, be approved to participate in the pool of prequalified consultants, on a continuing basis pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, in order to Page 232 of 878 assure that the City's needs for engineering services is available expeditiously from firms qualified to perform the work: CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.,as the second ranked proposer, 300 Engineering Group,P.A.,as the third ranked proposer,AECOM Technical Services,Inc.,as the fourth ranked proposer, King Engineering Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer, And Wade Trim, Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer for the pool of pre-qualified consultants. Finally, I further recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration, with the Prime Consultant and the pre-qualified firms. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services,determined upon successful negotiations,are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. Grant funding will not be utilized for this project. Legislative Tracking Public Works/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description o Attachment A--Evaluation Committee Scorings and Rankings Page 233 of 878 ui C)v. o c U S C451 C3 w e-"•4 . fp "-led CO N!et 1A cD Iti' cc, cr. • t L Qld 0 w 0,r N t? Q Q 4" a u,tD SC r Ate? r1 0 Q • G i tr znt.ev4 Auue;%gt Si 2 g SI; S i-w m r i^�2 2'O crO c t C r C)C? N az,a} n!cm(fl I(lar t ;n @ i � t ' f O ,� 2 2 r.A 2 2 2 A n. Q V7 O 'C'• of.M r a a)in to a to tt)a)0) G , . t i T.N{7.tt CO Qt Co tT CO.A '4*M..t`�,. t2 a • a 11, 4JN..!ml 2:'Atif A-rn ") MO OD N O?C,€• CO a)'g Ci a:a)Cat r✓3 u') a tfJ li.1 15 ig 20 4 o s�n?-1 `14g tor1cco*� o 8 7 ifl iilh >?x;:e?0. `t" ? u vs U OYWp, �,. �. yR � V W • C cJ �.. _r; . PS < v w Oo CV a a) V z ii,y 3 «r.,i?mo - d x rs y : 'iii'0°ut t v z O N r� Od Kt �'" aN 71 52;;-O} It.11 a t? Q O V a 11!tJ 3 x•V z yj z j 2 8 ut Z O &'21' E Z Z 3 N i u: Q I CI a z 2.� n UQ a z o flG i"ai11 z o : mZ z Z ed i ^i Q•i+�— y ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) '1:4 AiA I AAA I BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS April 19, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Tuesday. April 25. 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. II. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Pre-Submittal Meeting Sign In Sheet Exhibit B: 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection Ill. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: We recently submitted another proposal to the City on April 14 that required the Dun & Bradstreet report to be sent to the Procurement Contact. Do we need to submit this again or is there a form we can sign certifying the previous submission? Al: At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR). Q2: Does the prime responder have to show an employee as the Subject Matter Expert for all 8 categories or can we utilize a subconsultant for one or more categories? A2: Proposers must identify and submit evidence for Subject Matter Expert(s) Key Personnel. The RFQ does not require the subject matter experts to be employees. Q3: There seems to be a duplication in the 8 categories of work listed on page 15 unless the first 4 refer to the planning aspects of the project and the last 4 refer to the design work. Is that a correct interpretation of what the City meant? A3: There is no duplication. The City is seeking expertise that includes design capabilities and other non-design expertise in a subject area. The expert may be the 9 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS same person or different people in the same discipline, for example an experienced water operator may serve as the water distribution expert for matters that do not require a P.E.'s design expertise, or a P.E. with operational expertise may serve both functions. Q4: I am writing to respectfully request a two (2) week extension to the response deadline for RFQ 2017-129KB - Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater System Projects. A4: Please refer to time extension above. Q5: Since a Water and Wastewater Master Plan will be developed under Item III of the RFQ Statement of Work Required (page 29), and such Master Plans may affect the 20-year CIPs developed under Items I and II, wouldn't it make more sense to develop initially a first phase 5-year CIP (with the most urgent and immediate projects) and then, after the Master Plan is done (possibly 1 to 2 years after program start) amend the CIP as needed and make it a 20-year CIP (as requested) with the projects identified in the Master Plan? A5: Please refer to Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications, Subsection C2 "The services described in items I, and II are intended to be awarded immediately. The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future." Items I and II would become the system plan if item III is not authorized. Q6: What planning horizon should be covered under the Master Plan, since already the CIP is for a considerably long term (20 years)? For example, 30, 40, 50 years? A6: The expected life of the existing assets. Q7: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide land acquisition services in relation to the CIP projects it designs? A7: Not at this time. Q8: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide permitting services for the CIP projects it plans and designs? A8: Permitting services are not specifically identified in this RFQ; however the selected firm(s) under items III, V, VI, or VIII could be tasked with those services if offered. Q9: Does the City foresee the need for the selected firm to provide procurement assistance services for the CIP projects it plans and designs? If so, what level of assistance? A9: Procurement assistance is not specifically identified in this RFQ; however the selected firm(s) under items V, VI, VII, or VIII could be tasked with those services if offered. Q10: The RFQ Statement of Work Required lists "Value Engineering" as one of the possible services to be contracted. Since design is one of the services that may also be contracted, is it envisioned that some designs will not be performed by the Prime Consultant but rather by the consultants on the pre-qualified pool? Is there an idea of how much design work would be self-performed versus performed by the pool of consultants? 2 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS A10: The services may be performed by a single selectee, or any combination of selectees at the City's discretion. No estimates are currently available to describe amounts to be self-performed. Q11: The present email is to ask if the results of the Supplier Qualification Report (SQR by Dun & Bradstreet) are required for the proposal submittal or the confirmation of the SQR request suffices. All: Please refer to response Al above. Q12: Could you please provide a City of Miami Beach water and wastewater system description, including miles of pipeline and number and description of other system assets? Al2: Items I, and II include the development of inventories. An conceptual estimate is 4 water storage tanks, 180 miles of water lines, 152 miles of sewer lines, 33 pumping stations, 1,000 fire hydrants, 86 water crossings, 20 MGD to 25 MGD water and wastewater distribution/collection. Q13: Please confirm that no pricing or costing of services is required to be submitted with the response to the RFQ and that these would be negotiated with the selected respondent later on. A13: Cost of services is not a requirement of this RFQ, fees will be negotiated during the negotiation phase. Q14: Typically, a Master Plan (MP) precedes the Capital Investment Program (CIP) design. The MP looks at long term goals and projections (usually over a > 20 years) and then those are translated into projects that make up the CIP. The CIP is a comprehensive list of projects (a project inventory) that are scheduled and ordered depending on constraints (for example, execution or funding constraints). The RFQ, on the other hand, has CIP design as the first tasks. Is the thought that the CIPs developed under The Statement of Work Requirement section of the RFQ, item C2(I) and (II) (page 28 of the RFQ) be prepared as an inventory of information gathered from available sources, but later updated when the Master Plan is prepared? Can the logical order of the scope of work be altered so that MP comes first, in order to be more efficient? A14: Statements are well received and understood. The City anticipates significant immediate needs, and does not have the luxury of developing a master planning document prior to identifying most important projects due to timing restraints of capital markets. The City reserves the discretion to task the selectee(s) with any task without consideration to the order listed if deemed to be in its best interest as determined by the City. Q15: The CIP Development tasks require that all parts of the system be documented, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. What level of granular detail is 3 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS the City of Miami Beach looking for? For example, should all sewer manholes be inspected? Should every mile of sewer be inspected with CCTV or other technologies? Should water mains and other underground water infrastructure be inspected with the use of invasive technology (for example)? A15: The City expects the selectee(s) to review existing information, and recommend what efforts are needed to develop the capital improvement prioritization. Considering the recommendations negotiations will take place for the task(s). Q16: Have there been any water or wastewater infrastructure assessments performed in the past that can be provided? A16: Please see response A15 above. Q17: he Statement of Work Required states under the CIP Development tasks that "The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work". Does the City know what are the constraints for execution that would define the schedule of implementation? For example, is there a yearly CIP budget limit? A17: The City's goal of item I, and II is to understand needs based on a priority developed with a matrix that includes likelihood, and consequence of failure. The City will then determine the prudent level of spending that will determine the exact time horizon. Q18: Are there combined sewers or documented cross connections between storm and sanitary sewers? A18: None are known. Q19: Are storm sewers part of the scope of work? A19: No. Q20: Is there a Master Plan for the City and if so, can it be provided? A20: A current master plan for water and wastewater is not available. 021: Can you please provide any existing expansion or growth plans for the water or wastewater systems? A21: The City is considered largely built out, and expansion likelihood is limited. Q22: Can you provide a list of water and wastewater pump stations and their capacity? A22: Please refer to response Al2 above. Q23: Can you provide water and wastewater system maps of major infrastructure? 4 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS A23: Please refer to response Al2 above, and all existing GIS mapping will be provided to selectee(s). Q24: For the design scope of services, is the selected Prime Consultant expected to execute 100% design documents or will the Prime Consultant be providing preliminary design (say 30% design) for other Pre-Qualified Consultants from the Consultants Pool to execute to 100% under Prime Consultant review and supervision? A24: It is the City's option to task any consultant(s) with any level of service and negotiate pricing based on level of service. Q25: Is there a sub-consultant minimum set aside? Are there any set-aside requirements for minorities, women or other disadvantaged businesses? A25: There are no set-aside requirements. Q26: Can you provide a detail age, material and miles of pipe for the water system? A26: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q27: Can you provide a detail age, material and miles of pipe for the wastewater system? A27: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q28: Given the short time frame (particularly there are only ten days after questions are answered), will the City of Miami Beach consider providing more time and extending the deadline to respond to the RFQ? A28: Please refer to time extension above. 029: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's pressure reducing valves (PRVs) and pressure sustaining valves (PSVs)? Are these inspected and maintained on a regular basis? A29: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. Q30: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's fire hydrants? Are these inspected and maintained on a regular basis? A30: Please refer to response Al 2 and A23 above. Q31: Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's control valves? Are these exercised on a regular basis? A31: Please refer to response Al 2 and A23 above. Q32: Are wholesale water meters from transfers from the MDWASD system the City of Miami Beach responsibility? Can you provide an inventory and map of the water system's wholesale water meters? A32: Wholesale meters are owned and maintained by MDWASD. Also please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. 5 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Q33: Are there any wholesale wastewater flow meters to measure wastewater transfers to MDWASD? Are these the City of Miami Beach responsibility? Can you provide an inventory and map of the wastewater collection system flow meters? A33: Please refer to response A32 above. Q34: Can you supply or let us know where to get the SE Florida Climate Change Compact Planning Tool referred to in page 3 of the RFQ? A34: Please refer to Exhibit B additionally, all compact resources can be found here: http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/ . Q35: Can you provide a guideline of the amount of Design work this RFQ may require? A35: Estimates are not available. Q36: You stated in the pre-bid meeting that the City is a Waste water collector and a water distributor. We have seen that the County may be looking into Pre-Treatment Facilities, do you foresee any pretreatment WVVTP within the jurisdiction of Miami Beach? A36: The City is unaware of any pre-treatment plans. Q37: Can you provide or guide us into demographics, growth rate of population and City construction projects in the permit pipeline? A37: The City's CAFR located on City's website is the best information source we have available for this information. Q38: Can you identify any particular areas that will need to be prioritized due to excess growth impacting both systems? A38: Not at this time. Q39: Can we use 11 x 17 page sizing for the organizational chart? A39: Yes. Q40: Page 14, 2.2.1 — please clarify what is the difference between the Experts and the Design Engineer. We are not clear as to what you are looking for with these two similar designations. A40: Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individual(s) who as proposed will be selected to serve as the Subject Matter Expert(s). Also please refer to response A3 above. 041: Will the City post a sign in sheet from the pre-bid conference for the above reference RFQ? A41: Please refer to Exhibit A. Q42: Are any restrictions on the same firm developing the CIP, performing design, and 6 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS providing construction management and inspection services on the same project. A42: No. Q43: There was no reasonable measures Application attached to the RFP per Page 21 - Appendix A. A43: Reasonable measures application will be provided by the City during proposal submittals review to proposers which cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage). Q44: Per page 15, 2.3 Financial Capacity states "At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report." Does that mean we need to submit it with our proposal or to inform us it may be requested at another time. If we do need to submit the report, will the information be treated as confidential information? A44: The City will request the Supplier Qualification Report from Dun & Bradstreet directly from the prospective proposer upon receipt of proposal submittal. Q45: Do we need to provide a copy of our insurance certificate? A45: No, certificate of insurance will be requested at time of contract execution. Q46: Page 28, Cl, #2 —what information are you requesting to be submitted for "the volume of contract"? A46: Please include the dollar amount of the task. Q47: On Page 28, C2. Statement of Work Required. Please confirm that there is no submittal requirement for this section. A47: There is no submittal requirement for C2. Statement of Work Required (p. 28). Q48: Would the City consider extending the opening date of the solicitation? A48: Please refer to time extension above. Q48: Please clarify the role of the pool of pre-qualified consultants. We are looking to be a sub- consultant, as we do not have the qualifications to be a prime. Does that mean that we can submit our qualifications to this RFQ anyway, and note that we are submitting for the pool? Can we also team with a Prime, or will the Prime only be able to choose from the pool to use as their subs? A48: Proposers not selected as prime consultant(s) will qualify to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. 7 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Q49: Are there any restrictions of solicitation? A49: Please refer to response A42 above. Q50: What is the time period of the contract for the prime consultant chosen? A50: Term of contract shall be for a period of three (3) years with two (2) additional one (1) year renewal options. Q51: What is the contract capacity for the prime consultant? A51: As such, the scope or value of the work awarded to the prime consultant shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes. Q52: Is there a current CIP master available through the net? A52: No Q53: Are there any drawings of the area such as pump stations locations available? A53: Please refer to response Al2 and A23 above. 054: If a consultant submits to the pool are they allowed to be selected as the prime? A54: Please refer to response to A48 above. Q55: Can a firm submit to the pool and not the prime? A55: Please refer to response to A48 above. Q56: Will the City hire more than one prime for the CIP plan? A56: While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant, it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest. 057: Will the pool of consultants help to develop the CIP plan along with the prime consultant that is chosen? A57: The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. Q58: If you perform the design work what is the rule on the construction side of the project? A58: Please refer to response to A42 above. Q59: Will the City consider a team that does not meet all minimum requirements as a prime consultant? A59: Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to 8 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. SA -l ' lex Den' . Jr .-8 ement Director 9 ADDENDUM NO.1 1 ..... REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS Exhibit A Pre-Submittal Meeting Sign In Sheet 1 10 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS EAC„- CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS Kristy Bada Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 ext. 6218 kristvbadaamiamibeachfl.20 V 1C / /e7 Wei lc 3 or22) _ ) 2(0 Tclyc de/km/ci3/4 je- ir et et d 0 Si t s c1,1,3 L,141-1-,...3 or- avvk we-z Se,C.-6400 r-teL) e, 54 Gai 3-n s u s.( c"--tiovio -c u 99N 'f CO col SILk)c`;11 kfccec- ;0 ( 6 -411.11,) S ix 4-H1-017.3 ctS‘..00,iAeiyyl',1;kv) 505- Pezm r)/ 30g-d3s4 /Vein (la ez eir 74, p cairn -1,4tv.t.A/ i-6.5 5 Et atd, E Nve,v; . rut305—Tis--Lit57 17d 725,soci a) fe ---- 5 3-7 ct oo ,0 & 1 2- e 2/ei-na de z eIcS - 6-vieoixo, i'fq-Phi-WI/ azr C/6:efex.. Cootb Ito 'Oiu,5)*.xie-evs (1(1"11/4) Cite4kla° ji 0 ve loc)0 64,(01/ LA)A't 941. ei6W6-0 °\_ e ceSc at)a-AD ' A ' *** /V 4d, A/\\I' BEAC '1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL ADDRESS ackGicAv-Ako t\i - e vl nA cor+17vNte,z. c s ayro(At 031130S- 441-5414 30c- 464-54i4- o1 Ap., 1'4E4. Iss7-32)+-004g ixewpq V161:.11/4.14iS ...op,r.c.LASt I lieti.ts&-qtoievi.00,1 loq--VtiC. , --- J./viDA. . . devrtz,e, /-1*46 305% 668.39/4 11/61- -7010 .22/. 2,061 1 -'1e)c f;efilks 0.5,4 esirri up ' 3067.coz. 279 g ---- ,alt./cycles e.s 40,74 vp_ eas,,,,, k-rAs* 6), 64/20.-, GPM 14)chi ,404, dt- soc-is-i-zoo/ varuz-0 c pm f viii. Cow) 'pr./\)164- Ai?6i.if- LAT)G --rg riki &)e4efifriri-* .1);0 In 0' ' 3\Ma 08-,2 e 1 e, \--a-c\ 'T Cc h 30S-6105- 50(00 tr‘decre-reA-m\c-Ich.ci,„„), 64 R:ZSTOPO ER. Tt-Tre.A -recki SO 5 -1908- CAF-T-SteRt-ta. ZA\‘tk-I- KYQ..TEirzATECH.kt ti 1 49'1 0-0 - 772/ ilt, -77k/ JAW0ez. 0/kJ 56:OAR .co et Afek#7 fe',,t4 ---3 tc 43#Nit 4A 0 0,,,,,,./ efidotaert." e Seig#4-1 4o.i„v er,,, agfti< Oen de 12 cc.. ..44.)citi,ytit....)c. 1 .(' :,-70-227 3 idge -2xs 1 e--c)Ytt'ise,@ ko c.-c-i-evo . co wk.. ky,,,,1 0 Kiit,ohlq:k kek,,v/ RP coiyt. c44--ecc,d- Lryl c, ?xe-S'--S1 -2,g2s7 3itir---SN 2 —2--ES"175"-r I oko(eito 41/z4it4crai CFI 17 tl ..?Ds--37Z-)t-ii 20r-377. 7161 , CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS vg a kk 6fit Ve,4/adr vte,oslitit kg,c. -105 Le*Safto sos Os_ 3 -AAA Ioedkv 0..Qc1votrcx,&,-3001a5i'vtibit"-w -it(oRtize,,Ft 3oo -E6904ke,A,14.9 eLEsoc feaaftto ets 30o i; OMAt, Abtor(A, &)Sci06tte215 5DC (."93 731- eki ‘4)'' '‘ el WA/apt. 3)0i t411,040114:"..0* RalAttsik ged-A1 ctif‘.Ifrted144-5441146(4" 341‘{C ?leo askAelfer ‘)A r‘oibt„it. szsAs • s ,iss-z.ls-si t\logri3ver-ScAT ifi4A4q zrfki ( 6-17 arott) G./ n 49 i #6.9gf . 1.4q. qi(05, ciigr.wp cm, 3 • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: April 5, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS NAME COMPANY NAME PHONE# FAX# (PLEASE PRINT) E-MAIL ADDRESS COaLStea C\f(c)-erYi o VeS B Gfri}1 Cat4 COln PeikeVi 4 e, COTIi T jot La cmo Coo Porstvt t, 1 VNJ ctou 41) (4\ Y--YomtE vi C-olt, V\Ickciu -rviro Ae9Yi' \ COVIP(Aqm, I, CA 11 \ AI, I' At/coyyk, CosAP- ti CiAoi fV1,001Q-2t Ass()C . Aco& Coo C ir CDaS te, I Sam fYkt-v-r-(‘ Exhibit B 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection 1 11 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-129-KB ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS '$ $ vkit' MEMORANDUM TO: Management Team -41.1r.1110.;;;;7°.FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager ,.•�' DATE: March 23, 2016 SUBJECT: 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Project on BACKGROUND We are taking aggressive action across the City today to address sea level rise, from stormwater projects to land use amendments. We are also planning for the future and developing a citywide Resiliency Strategy. The purpose of this memorandum is to make sure that all staff is aware of and utilizing the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's Unified Sea Level Rise Projection. The projection was updated in October of 2015 and adopted by our City Commission at the March 9, 2016 meeting. It is an excellent planning tool with accompanying guidance and training. The projection is required to be used for relevant planning and construction throughout all departments. The following is a list of key programs that are to incorporate the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection: • The scope of Procurement solicitations; • Capital Improvement Projects (CIP planning) for all departments; • Public Works projects; • Transportation projects; and • Additional projects and programs as appropriate. UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION OVERVIEW The updated Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida projects the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100. The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1. Short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level. 2. Medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean sea level. 3. Long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea level. SLR Projection March 23, 2016 Page 2 of 3 Po Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) 70 u. IPCC AR5 ti u Year Median USACE High 1\104A High v (inches) (Inches) (inches) //' a c° c 40 M 2030 6 10 12 a� 2 40 2060 14 26 34 cv CU Al 2100 31 61 81 f� m L � 26" .- •r ..- v '. 14 •'''• --' • le • __ �n �,r•r_ ��o+d��i`�tarnr�lsid?E!9t�AA#rt�rrncsc�`�r8 Lo, 0 1092 2000 2010 1020 20:.<'0 20.1.E 20t0 20W 2::,10 20Q 2u90 r 1E J Year Figure 1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC ARS RCP8.5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve),the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100.The USACE intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. The lower boundary of the projection (dashed line) can be applied in designing low risk projects that are easily replaceable with short design lives, are adaptable and have limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services. The shaded zone is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short-term planning horizon. It reflects what the Work Group projects will be the most likely range of sea level rise for the remainder of the 21st Century. The upper curve of the projection should be utilized for planning of high risk and critical infrastructure projects. TRAINING AND RESOURCES Integrating the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection into planning and operations is vital, citywide. In the 2016 Management Team survey on Sustainability and Resiliency, feedback included more than 100 ideas, including continuing with planning and codifying (18), increasing staff awareness and staff (11), and developing specific ways for departments and employees to help (4). Sea Level Rise Projection training was provided for City staff on March 14th, 2016 by Dr. Samantha Danchuk from Broward County, who served as lead staff to the Compact working group. Dr. Danchuck presented how the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection was developed utilizing the most recent science, how to understand and use the different planning horizons based on the type of project and location, and shared guidance resources. The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection and Guidance will be updated every five to seven years to account for the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to global climate change. SLR Projection March 23, 2016 Page 3 of 3 For additional information and resources: • The March le Unified Sea Level Rise Projection training video can be viewed on MBTV at: http://vp.telvue.com/preview?id=T03249&video=269185 • The 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, including guidance in applying the projections, is available on the Compact website at: http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-Compact- Unified-Sea-Level-Rise-Proiection.pdf • City of Miami Beach Resolution 2016-29317 is available at: http://miamibeach1315/WebLink/PDF/zlh2klozitpi3tjddg54axg0/3/2016-29317%2oReso.pdf With professionalism, experience, and innovation, we will make the most of these excellent resources. We will continue to plan effectively now and in the future. Please contact Susanne M. Torriente, Chief Resiliency Officer, with any questions or comments with regards to this memorandum. SMT/AK/ESW I UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE 44 PROJECTION ,$ 6 souTHEAST FLORIDA 4,,,,,, 1111301Millikii AL11111;:k",, 3 REGIONAL COMPACT L I M \I dii, 4c"" - -,„ \i ' ' . ...„,,,./...,. ''''' ,„‘,., .\ i 1 yi is r/� ., 7,070X,24,..740.111.01 October 2015 IMAICANS. Prepared by the ,y, .,„;.,,,,„-- Sea Level Rise Work Group ,,7`,2,agt :59r2G2i 9:i SfS;S'!,ri CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida 4 Projection and Summary 4 Projection Development Methodology 6 Projection Update 6 Guidance for Application 9 Increase in Recurrent Flooding and Reduced Drainage Capacity 9 Storm Surge and Sea Level Rise 10 Natural Resource Degradation 10 Guidance in Applying The Projections 11 Audiences 11 Applying Projection Curves to Infrastructure Siting And Design 11 Available Vulnerability Assessments 13 Summary 13 Literature Cited 15 Appendix A:Stand Alone Guidance Document and Projection 21 Appendix B:State of Science Update 26 Acceleration of Sea Level Rise ..26 Factors Influencing Sea Level Rise 26 Global Processes 26 Regional/Local Processes 28 Appendix C:Workgroup Commentary and Recommendations 33 Appendix D:Acknowledgement of Participants 34 Appendix E: Deviation from 2011 Projection 35 Recommended Citation Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Sea Level Rise Work Group (Compact). October 2015. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 35 p. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact reconvened the Sea Level Rise Work Group for the purpose of updating the unified regional projection based on global projections, guidance documents and scientific literature released since the original regional projection in 2011 (Compact, 2011). The objective of the unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast Florida region remains consistent that the projection is for use by the Climate Compact Counties and partners for planning purposes to aid in understanding of potential vulnerabilities and to provide a basis for developing risk informed adaptation strategies for the region. For the 2015 update, the starting point for all sea level rise projections has been shifted from 2010 to 1992. This allows for direct use of local tide station information to convert projections into local water surface elevations for flood vulnerability studies, and is consistent with current guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). The Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida has also been extended to 2100 in recognition of the need for longer range guidance for major infrastructure and other long term investments now being planned. In the short term, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches by 2030 and 14 to 26 inches by 2060 (above the 1992 mean sea level). In the long term, sea level rise is projected to be 31 to 61 inches by 2100. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper curve is recommended with planning values of 34 inches in 2060 and 81 inches in 2100. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory (2015) has reported the average global sea level has risen almost 3 inches between 1992 and 2015 based on satellite measurements. Sea level rise in South Florida has been of similar magnitude over the same period (NOAA, 2015) but is anticipated to outpace the global average due to ongoing variations in the Florida Currents and Gulf Stream. Projected sea level rise, especially by 2060 and beyond, has a significant range of variation as a result of uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions and their geophysical effects, the incomplete quantitative understanding of all geophysical processes that might affect the rate of sea level rise in climate models and the limitations of current climate models to predict the future. As such, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection include three curves, in descending order, the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve and a curve corresponding to the median of the IPCC ARS RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to how and when they should be used in planning. This guidance document describes the recommended application of the projection as it relates to both high and low risk projects and short and long- term planning efforts. Also, the Work Group recommends that this guidance be updated every 1 five to seven years because of the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to global climate change and potential impacts. INTRODUCTION WHO SHOULD USE THIS PROJECTION AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENT? The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to both short and long-term planning horizons and infrastructure design in the Southeast Florida area. HOW SHOULD THE REGIONAL PROJECTION BE APPLIED? The projection (Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida)contains a graph and table describing the rise in sea level from 1992 through the turn of the current century.The projection can be used to estimate future sea level elevations in Southeast Florida and the relative change in sea level from today to a point in the future. Guidance for Application contains directions and specific examples of how the projection can be used by local governments, planners, designers and engineers and developers. This regional projection is offered to ensure that all major infrastructure projects throughout the Southeast Florida region have the same basis for design and construction relative to future sea level. WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH SEA LEVEL RISE? The consequences associated with sea level rise include direct physical impacts such as coastal inundation of inland areas, increased frequency of flooding in vulnerable coastal areas, increased flooding in interior areas due to impairment of the region's stormwater infrastructure i.e. impacts to gravity drainage systems and features in the regional water management canal system, saltwater intrusion into the aquifer and local water supply wells, and contamination of the land and ocean with pollutants and debris and hazardous materials released by flooding. Consequences also include cascading socio-economic impacts such as displacement, decrease in property values and tax base, increases in insurance costs, loss of services and impaired access to infrastructure. The likelihood and extent to which these impacts will occur is dependent upon the factors influencing the rate of sea level rise such as the amount of greenhouse gases emitted globally, rate of melting of land-based ice sheets, the decisions and investments made by communities to increase their climate resilience and the many interconnected processes described in the Appendix B: State of Science Update. One of the values of this sea level rise projection is the ability to perform scenario testing to better understand the potential impacts and timeline of sea level rise within the Southeast Florida community. 2 WHO DEVELOPED THE UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA? In 2010, the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee organized the first Regional Climate Change Compact Technical Ad hoc Work Group (Work Group). Their objective was to develop a unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast Florida region for use by the Climate Compact Counties and partners. Its primary use was for planning purposes to aid in understanding of potential vulnerabilities and to provide a basis for outlining adaptation strategies for the region. The Work Group reviewed existing projections and scientific literature and developed a unified regional projection for the period from 2010 to 2060 (Compact, 2011). The projection highlighted two planning horizons: 1) by 2030, sea level rise was projected to be 3 to 7 inches above the 2010 mean sea level and 2) by 2060, sea level rise was projected to be 9 to 24 inches above the 2010 mean sea level. In anticipation of the release of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2013), the Sea Level Rise Work Group recommended a review of the projection four years after its release in 2011. In September 2014, the Sea Level Rise Work Group was reconvened for the purpose of updating the unified regional projection based on projections and scientific literature released since 2011. This report released in October 2015 contains a summary of the projections and publications reviewed and discussed, the methodology for deriving the projection, the recommended unified regional projection and additional recommendations from the Sea Level Rise Work Group. 3 UNIFIED SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTION FOR SOUTHEAST FLORIDA PROJECTION AND SUMMARY This Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida updated in 2015 projects the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 1). The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1) short term, by 2030, sea level is projected to rise 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level, 2) medium term, by 2060, sea level is projected to rise 14 to 34 inches above 1992 mean sea level, 3) long term, by 2100, sea level is projected to rise 31 to 81 inches above 1992 mean sea level. Projected sea level rise in the medium and long term has a significant range of variation as a result of uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions and their geophysical effects, the incomplete quantitative understanding of all geophysical processes affecting the rate of sea level rise in climate models and current limitations of climate models to predict the future. As such, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection include three global mean sea level rise curves regionally adapted to account for the acceleration of sea level change observed in South Florida. The titles of the global mean sea level rise curves were retained for simplicity of referencing source but the curves have been adjusted from the global projections to reflect observed local change. The projection consists of the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve (also known as the NOAA Intermediate- High) and the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to how and when they should be used in planning. • The lower boundary of the projection (blue dashed line) can be applied in designing low risk projects that are easily replaceable with short design lives, are adaptable and have limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services. • The shaded zone between the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 median curve and the USACE High is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short -term planning horizon. It reflects what the Work Group projects will be the most likely range of sea level rise for the remainder of the 21st Century. • The upper curve of the projection should be utilized for planning of high risk projects to be constructed after 2060 or projects which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years) or are critically interdependent with other infrastructure or services. 4 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015) 70 "` IPCC AR5 USACE High NOAA High -) > 60 Year Median (inches) (inches) c.) (inches) , c50 _. �.._. _ __ __.........._....................._ ..._..._____._._T._.. __ w12 � � 2030 6 � 10 c .... .... m......... . . . m . ..__._. -"—' o 40 2060 14 26 E 34 cc1 ..,...,.._. -7,-, › › 7-.:, 2100 31 CI) co L61 l 81 .- _, -a3 30 26" > 2.0• L3 I« -.. _ co 75r,. 10 ...•�- . ..- ..—„"——.,"""1.- USACE Intermediate/NOAA Intermediate Low w\a\NN'.WU\N\\NNNN�N�u\aHN"N f s s +a//: •� .�.� . 0 1992 2000 2010. 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year Figure 1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve),the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100.The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. 5 PROJECTION DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY PROJECTION UPDATE The key components of the methodology used to develop the unified sea level rise projection are as follows: 0 Planning Horizon of 2100: In response to the release of climate scenarios extending to year 2100 from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), projections through year 2100 by federal agencies including the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the need for planning for infrastructure with design lives greater than 50 years,the unified sea level rise projection time scale has been extended to 2100. rilik Starting in 1992: The year 1992 has been selected as the initial year of the projection because it is the center of the current mean sea level National Tidal Datum Epoch of 1983- 2001. A tidal datum epoch is a 19 year period adopted by the National Ocean Service as the official time segment over which tide observations are used to establish tidal datums such as mean sea level, mean high water etc. The National Tidal Datum Epoch is revised every 20-25 years to account for changing sea levels and land elevations. 4.4;) Tide gauge selection:The Key West gauge (NOAA Station ID 8724580) was maintained as the reference gauge for calculation of the regional projection as was used in the original projection. In addition, appropriate conversion calculations are provided in Section 4: Guidance for Application in order to reference the projection to the Miami Beach gauge (NOAA Station ID 8723170) or the Lake Worth Pier gauge (NOAA Station ID 8722670).The Key West gauge has recorded tidal elevations since 1913.Tidal records from Miami Beach and Lake Worth Pier are available since 2003 and 1996, respectively. 1110 Review of existing projections:Global projections released since 2011 were reviewed and considered for interpretation for the unified sea level rise projection including those developed by USACE (2011; 2013), NOAA (Parris et al., 2012), IPCC (IPCC, 2013), Bamber and Aspinall (2013), Horton et al. (2014), Jevrejeva et al. (2014), and Kopp et al. (2014). Review criteria included comprehensiveness of datasets and models used to develop the projections, standing in the scientific community, and applicability to the Southeast Florida region. 6 Summaries of the existing global projections are included below: •:' USACE Guidance: There was no update to the projections since 2011 (USAGE, 2011). The range of global mean sea level change projected by USAGE was approximately 0.2 to 0.6 meters(9 to 25 inches) by 2060 and 0.5 to 1.5 meters (20 to 59 inches) by 2100. Existing guidance and the online USAGE Sea Level Change Calculator were used to adapt the global mean sea level change curves for the unified South Florida projection. ':• IPCC AR5 Projections: The 5th Assessment Report (AR5) included four scenarios based on predicted greenhouse gas concentration trajectories (Regional Concentration Pathways, RCPs). The global mean sea level change projected in these scenarios ranged from 0.17 to 0.38 meters (7 to 15 inches)by years 2046 to 2065 and 0.26 to 0.82 meters (10 to 32 inches) by 2081 to 2100. ❖ NOAA Projections produced for the National Climate Assessment (NCA): For the 2014 NCA, four global mean sea level rise scenarios were defined in a manner allowing the user to select the appropriate curve based on risk of concern, uncertainty tolerance and type of application. The global mean sea level rise projected in these scenarios ranges from 0.2 meters to 2 meters(8 to 80 inches)by 2100. ':' Recent Probabilistic Projections:Recently, several authors have quantitatively and qualitatively approached determining the likelihood or percent chance that the global mean sea level rise projections will occur by 2100. For example, based on a probability density function, Jevrejeva et al. (2014) concluded that there is only a 5% chance global mean sea level rise will be larger than 1.8 meters (71 inches) by 2100. Using an alternate method, Kopp et al. (2014) concluded there is only a 5% chance global mean sea level rise will be larger than 1.76 meters(69 inches). These studies represent examples of possible methods of further explaining applicability of projections for future use. ':' Science Community Polling: Several polls have been conducted amongst groups within the scientific community to understand the experts'opinions on the level of uncertainty associated with existing global mean sea level rise projections. These surveys have yielded reported likely ranges of global mean sea level rise of 0.4 to 1.2 m (16 to 42 inches) depending on warming scenarios (Horton et al., 2014) and 0.29 m to 0.84 m (11 to 33 inches) (Bamber and Aspinall, 2013) by 2100. 7 0 Projection confidence: The understanding of past sea level changes has improved since the Work Group's last review due to additional observations and analyses of processes driving thermal expansion, loss of ice from ice sheets and glaciers and terrestrial water storage by the scientific community. Despite this improved understanding, the development of complex climate models is evolutionary and many processes and responses are yet to be incorporated. The numerous ice melt accelerating feedbacks not in the models are especially of concern as they are speeding up ice melt and sea level rise well beyond model projections. Models do continue to offer useful approximations of trends and order of magnitude of rates of change and acceleration based on climate data input and are suitable for determining projected future ranges for planning and design efforts. Additionally, as noted in Parris et al. (2012), the quadratic curves comprising the projection were selected by the some of the scientific community for simplicity. Sea level will not rise in the smooth manner illustrated by the quadratic curves but, may be punctuated by faster and slower rates (Parris et al., 2013). 8 GUIDANCE FOR APPLICATION INCREASE IN RECURRENT FLOODING AND REDUCED DRAINAGE CAPACITY Recent analyses of tide gauge records acquired along the US Atlantic coast indicate a rapid acceleration in the rate of sea level rise since 2000, which was attributed to possible slowing down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) (Ezer et al., 2013; Sallenger et al., 2012;Yin et al., 2009).The higher sea level resulted in increasing flooding frequency in several coastal communities, e.g., Boston, Norfolk, and Miami Beach (Ezer et al., 2013; Kirshen et al., 2008; Kleinosky et al., 2007; Wdowinski et al., 2015). These frequent flood events, often termed "nuisance flooding", occur mainly due to heavy rain during high tide conditions but sometimes occur due to high tide alone and are termed "King tides","lunar flooding"or"sunny sky flooding". Recently, Ezer and Atkinson (2014) used tide gauge data to calculate accumulated flooding time in twelve locations along the Atlantic coast and showed a significant increase in flooding duration over the past twenty years. They suggested that flood duration is a reliable indicator for the accelerating rate of sea level rise, which is often difficult to estimate on a regional-scale. On the national scale, NOAA (2014) published an assessment of nuisance flooding finding that the duration and frequency of these events are intensifying around the United States. Subsequently, Sweet and Park (2014) demonstrated that coastal areas are experiencing an increased frequency of flood events (an acceleration) over the last few decades, and that this acceleration in flood occurrence will continue regardless of the specific rate of sea level rise. A detailed analysis of nuisance flooding occurrence in Miami Beach was conducted by Wdowinski et al. (2015), who used a variety of data sources (tide gauge, rain gauge, media reports, insurance claims, and photo records) from the past 16 years (1998-2013). They found that most flooding events occur after heavy rain (> 80 mm, 3 inches) during high tide conditions, but also after the fall equinox tides regardless of rain events. An analysis of flooding frequency over the past 16 years revealed that since 2006, rain-induced events increased by 33% and tide-induced events quadrupled, from 2 events during 1998-2005 to 8-16 events in 2006-2013. Wdowinski et al. (2015) also analyzed the nearby Virginia Key tide gauge record and found a significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise since 2006. The average rate of regional sea level rise since 2006 is 9±4 mm/yr, significantly higher than the global average rate of 2.8±0.4 mm/yr estimated from in-situ data (Church and White, 2011). Although the Work Group notes that continued analysis of changes in trends over time is necessary to determine long-term significance of this recently observed uptrend, studies have already begun to correlate the regional sea level rise to the slowing down of the Gulfstream. A comparison between sea level variations near Miami with high-resolution global climate model simulations (Kirtman et al., 2012) revealed a strong correlation between increasing sea level rise in the Miami area and a 9 weakening of the Florida Current-Gulf Stream system. This finding confirmed concurs with other studies that relate sea level rise acceleration along the US Atlantic coast with weakening of the Gulf Stream (e.g., Ezer et al., 2013; Park and Sweet, 2015). STORM SURGE AND SEA LEVEL RISE Storm surge and sea level rise are independent coastal processes that when occurring simultaneously lead to compounded impacts. Sea level rise will increase the inland areal extent inundated by surges, the depth of flooding and power of the surge and the extent and intensity of damage associated with storm surge and waves. As a result, severe storms of the future will cause more damage than storms of equal intensity occurring at today's sea level. Tebaldi et al. (2012) estimate a 100-year magnitude surge flooding (by today's standards) will begin to occur every 20 years at the projected mean sea level in 2050. Regional hazard mapping does not yet include the combined effects of sea level rise and surge but the impacts are anticipated to be significant. Historically, the sea level extremes have increased along with the increase in mean sea level at locations along the coasts. Using this as the basis, one can relate the sea level extremes to mean sea level which allows the determination of future extremes and return periods (Obeysekera and Park, 2013). Another approach is to use the non-tidal residuals (component of storm surge and waves above the tidal variations), NTR, and determine their probabilistic characteristics. Assuming future sea level rise scenarios and the tidal variations, one can then superimpose extreme storm surge of NTR for a given return period to determine total sea level extreme for a given time epoch in the future. Return period for a given scenario can be determined using methods outlined in Salas and Obeysekera (2014). Both approaches assume there is no change in future "storminesss" although with higher sea levels, magnitude of storm surge may change at some locations along the coasts. NATURAL RESOURCE DEGRADATION As sea level rise increasingly inundates coastal areas, there is the potential for degradation of natural resources and loss of their services to the surrounding environment. Ecosystems will transition either by retreat and migration, adaptation, or elimination of functions and certain species. Shallow water habitats may transition to open water, forcing ecological changes in coastal wetlands and estuaries affecting nesting, spawning and feeding locations and behavior. Intrusion of saltwater inland, into inland water bodies and within the aquifer is negatively impacting freshwater resources, and these impacts will worsen or accelerate with further sea level rise. Inundation of shorelines will increase the extent and severity of beach erosion and 10 previously stable coastal areas. In combination, these impacts will cascade throughout the region's ecosystems even if they are not immediately adjacent to open water areas. Natural infrastructure is critical to the resilience of the urban environment, in that it provides many benefits related to storm protection, water and air purification, moderating urban heat effects, and socio-economics. South Florida's tourist economy is heavily dependent on these natural resources. The region must prioritize providing space for habitat transitions and focus on reducing anthropogenic pressures that would compound the degrading effects of sea level rise. GUIDANCE IN APPLYING THE PROJECTIONS AUDIENCES The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida is intended to be used for planning purposes by a variety of audiences and disciplines when considering sea level rise in reference to both short and long-term planning horizons as well as infrastructure siting and design in the Southeast Florida area. Potential audiences for the projections include, but are not limited to, elected officials, urban planners,architects,engineers, developers, resource managers and public works professionals. One of the key values of the projection is the ability to associate specific sea level rise scenarios with timelines. When used in conjunction with vulnerability assessments, these projections inform the user of the potential magnitude and extent of sea level rise impact at a general timeframe in the future.The blue shaded portion of the projection provides a likely range for sea level rise values at specific planning horizons. Providing a range instead of a single value may present a challenge to users such as engineers who are looking to provide a design with precise specifications. Public works professionals and urban planners need to work with the engineers and with policy makers to apply the projection to each project based on the nature, value, interconnectedness, and life cycle of the infrastructure proposed. Finally, elected officials should use the projections to inform decision making related to issues such as adaptation policies, budget impacts associated with design features which address planning for future sea level rise, capital improvement project needs especially those associated with drainage and shoreline protection, and land use decisions. APPLYING PROJECTION CURVES TO INFRASTRUCTURE SITING AND DESIGN When determining how to apply the projection curves, the user needs to consider the nature, value, interconnectedness, and life cycle of the existing or proposed infrastructure. The blue 11 shaded portion of the projection can be applied to most infrastructure projects, especially those with a design life expectancy of less than 50 years. The designer of a type of infrastructure that is easily replaced, has a short lifespan, is adaptable,and has limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services must weigh the potential benefit of designing for the upper blue line with the additional costs. Should the designer opt for specifying the lower curve, she/he must consider the consequences of under-designing for the potential likely sea level condition. Such consequences may include premature infrastructure failure. Additionally, planning for adaptation should be initiated in the conceptual phase. A determination must be made on whether or not threats can be addressed mid-life cycle via incremental adaptation measures, such as raising the height of a sluice gate on a drainage canal.. Forward thinking risk management is critical to avoiding loss of service, loss of asset value and most importantly loss of life or irrecoverable resources. An understanding of the risks that critical infrastructure will be exposed to throughout its life cycle such as sea level rise inundation, storm surge and nuisance flooding must be established early on in the conceptual phase. If incremental adaptation is not possible for the infrastructure proposed and inundation is likely, designing to accommodate the projected sea level rise at conception or selection of an alternate site should be considered. Projects in need of a greater factor of safety related to potential inundation should consider designing for the upper limit of the blue-shaded zone. Examples of such projects may include evacuation routes planned for reconstruction, communications and energy infrastructure and critical government and financial facilities. Due to the community's fundamental reliance on major infrastructure, existing and proposed critical infrastructure should be evaluated using the upper curve of the projection, the orange curve (Figure 1, NOAA High). Critical projects include those or projects which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years), or are interdependent with other infrastructure or services. If failure of the critical infrastructure would have catastrophic impacts, it is considered to be high risk. Due of the community's critical reliance on major infrastructure, existing and proposed high risk infrastructure should be evaluated using the upper curve of the projection, the orange curve (Figure 1, NOAA High). Examples of high risk critical infrastructure include nuclear power plants, wastewater treatment facilities, levees or impoundments, bridges along major evacuation routes, airports, seaports, railroads, and major highways. For low risk infrastructure projects, the lowermost curve of the projection (Figure 1, IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 curve) may be applied. Low risk projects include infrastructure expected to be constructed and then replaced within the next 10 years, projects that are easily replaceable and 12 adaptable or projects with limited interdependencies and limited impacts when failure occurs. An example of such a project may be a small culvert in an isolated area. Additionally, planning for adaptation should be initiated in the conceptual phase. A determination must be made on whether or not risk can be addressed mid-life cycle via incremental. If incremental adaptation is not possible for the type of high risk infrastructure proposed and inundation is likely, designing to accommodate the projected sea level rise at conception or selection of an alternate site should be considered. To ensure an appropriately conservative design approach is used, the upper limit of the projection (Figure 1, NOAA High) should be used for projects with design lives of more than 50 years. AVAILABLE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and the individual Compact Counties have developed region-wide and county-wide sea level rise inundation vulnerability assessments available for public use (Compact, 2012). These assessments spatially delineate areas of inundation correlating to 1 foot, 2 feet and 3 feet of sea level rise. In addition, the Compact website hosts a multitude of sources of information, tools and links in support of adaptation and mitigation planning for use by the Compact communities. SUMMARY The Work Group recommends the use of the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve (USACE, 2015) and the median of the IPCC ARS RCP8.5 scenario (IPCC, 2013) as the basis for a Southeast Florida sea level rise projection for the 2030, 2060 and 2100 planning horizons. In the short term, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches by 2030 and 14 to 26 inches by 2060 (above the 1992 mean sea level). Sea level has risen 3 inches from 1992 to 2015. In the long term, sea level rise is projected to be 31 to 61 inches by 2100. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper curve is recommended with planning values of 34 inches in 2060 and 81 inches in 2100. Sea level will continue to rise even if global mitigation efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are successful at stabilizing or reducing atmospheric CO2 concentrations; however, emissions mitigation is essential to moderate the severity of potential impacts in the future. A substantial increase in sea level rise within this century is likely and may occur in rapid pulses rather than gradually. The recommended projection provides guidance for the Compact Counties and their partners to initiate planning to address the potential impacts of sea level rise on the region.The shorter term planning horizons(through 2060) are critical to implementation of the Southeast Florida Regional 13 Climate Change Action Plan, to optimize the remaining economic life of existing infrastructure and to begin to consider adaptation strategies. As scientists develop a better understanding of the factors and reinforcing feedback mechanisms impacting sea level rise, the Southeast Florida community will need to adjust the projections accordingly and adapt to the changing conditions. To ensure public safety and economic viability in the long run, strategic policy decisions will be needed to develop guidelines to direct future public and private investments to areas less vulnerable to future sea level rise impacts. 14 LITERATURE CITED Bamber J. L., Aspinall, W. P. 2013. An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nat Clim Change 3: 424-427 Bell, R. E., Tinto, K., Das, I., Wolovick, M., Chu, W., Creyts, T. T., ... & Paden, J. D. 2014. Deformation, warming and softening of Greenland [rsquor] s ice by refreezing meltwater. Nature Geoscience. Bintanja, R., Van Oldenborgh, G.J., Drijfhout, S. S., Wouters, B., & Katsman, C.A. 2013. Important role for ocean warming and increased ice-shelf melt in Antarctic sea-ice expansion. Nature Geoscience, 6(5), 376-379. Blewitt, G., Kreemer, C., Hammond, W.C., Gazeaux, J. 2015. MIDAS trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection, Journal of Geophysical Research, in review. Bock, Y., Wdowinski, S., Ferretti, A., Novali, F., and Fumagalli, A. 2012. Recent subsidence of the Venice Lagoon from continuous GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13. Q03023. doi:10.1029/2011GC003976. Calafat, F.M. and Chambers, D.P. 2013. Quantifying recent acceleration in sea level unrelated to internal climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40. 3661-3666. doi:10.1002/gr1.50731. Church, J.A. and White, N.J. 2011. Sea-Level Rise from the Late 19th to the Early 21st Century. Surveys in Geophysics. 32(4-5). 585-602. doi:10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1. Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W.J.,Johns,T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M.,Tebaldi, C., Weaver,A.J. &Wehner, M. 2013. Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In: Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V. & Midgley P.M. (eds.), Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Ezer, T., Atkinson, L.P., Corlett, W.B., and Blanco, J.L. 2013. Gulf Stream's induced sea level rise and variability along the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 118. 685-697. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (Compact). 2012. Analysis of the Vulnerability of Southeast Florida to Sea Level Rise. 181 p. http://www.southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org//wp-content/uploads/2014/09/vulnerability- assessment.pdf 15 Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Technical Ad hoc Work Group (Compact). 2011. A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida. A document prepared for the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. 27 p. Ezer, T. and Atkinson, L.P. 2014. Accelerated flooding along the U.S. East Coast: On the impact of sea-level rise, tides, storms, the Gulf Stream, and the North Atlantic Oscillations. Earth's Future. 2. 362-382. doi:10.1002/2014EF000252. Flick, R., Knuuti, K., and Gill, S. 2012. Matching mean sea level rise projections to local elevation datums. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 139(2). 142-146. Gardner, A.S., Moholdt, G., Cogley,J.G., Wouters, B., Arendt,A.A., Wahr,J., Berthier, E., Hock, R., Pfeffer, W.T., Kaser, G., Ligtenberg, S.R.M., Bolch, T., Sharp, M.J., Hagen, J.O., van den Broeke, M.R., and Paul, F. 2013. A Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009, Science. 340 (6134). 852-857. doi:10.1126/science.1234532. Greenbaum, J.S., Blankenship, D.D., Young, D.A., Richter, T.G., Roberts, J.L., Aitken, A.R.A., Legresy, B., Schroeder, D.M., Warner, R.C., van Ommen, T.D., and Siegert, M.J. 2015. Ocean access to a cavity beneath Totten Glacier in East Antarctica, Nature Geosci., publ. online 16 March doi:10.1038/NGEO2388, 2015. Hallberg, R., A. Adcroft, J. Dunne, J. Krasting, and R. J. Stouffer. 2013. Sensitivity of 21st century global-mean steric sea level rise to ocean model formulation. J. Clim. 26. 2947-2956. Hay, C. C., Morrow, E., Kopp, R. E., & Mitrovica, J. X. 2015. Probabilistic reanalysis of twentieth- century sea-level rise. Nature, 517(7535), 481-484. Hellmer, H. H., Kauker, F., Timmermann, R., Determann, J., & Rae, J. 2012. Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current. Nature, 485(7397), 225-228. Horton, B.P., Rahmstorf, S., Engelhart, S.E., Kemp, A.C., 2014. Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quaternary Science Reviews. 84. 1-6. IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013.The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group Ito the Fifth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York. Jacob, T., Wahr, J., Pfeffer, W.T., Swenson, S. 2012. Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature. 482. 514-518. Jacobs, S. S., Jenkins, A., Giulivi, C. F., & Dutrieux, P. 2011. Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf. Nature Geoscience, 4(8), 519-523. 16 Jenkins, A., Dutrieux, P.,Jacobs, S. S., McPhail, S. D., Perrett, J. R., Webb, A. T., & White, D. 2010. Observations beneath Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica and implications for its retreat. Nature Geoscience, 3(7), 468-472. Jevrejeva, S., Grinstead, A., and Moore, J.C., 2014. Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100. Environ. Res. Lett. 9 (2014) 104008 (9pp). Johnson, G. C., McTaggart, K. E., & Wanninkhof, R. 2014. Antarctic Bottom Water temperature changes in the western South Atlantic from 1989 to 2014. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(12), 8567-8577. Joughin, I., &Alley, R. B. 2011.Stability of the West Antarctic ice sheet in a warming world. Nature Geoscience, 4(8), 506-513. King, M.A., Bingham, R.J., Moore, P.,Whitehouse, P. L., Bentley, M.J., & Milne, G.A. 2012. Lower satellite-gravimetry estimates of Antarctic sea-level contribution. Nature, 491(7425), 586-589. Kirshen, P., Knee, K., and Ruth, M. 2008. Climate change and coastal flooding in Metro Boston: impacts and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change. 90(4). 453-473. d o i:10.1007/s 10584-008-9398-9. Kirtman, B.P., Bitz, C., Bryan, F., Collins, W., Dennis, J., Hearn, N., Kinterlll, J.L., Loft, R., Rousset, C., Siqueira, L., Stan, C., Tomas, R., Vertenstein, M. 2012. Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations. Climate Dynamics. 39(6). 1303-1328. d o i:10.1007/s00382-012-1500-3. Kleinosky, L.R., Yarnal, B., and Fisher,A. 2007. Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to storm- surge flooding and sea-level rise. Natural Hazards. 40(1). 43-70. d o i:10.1007/s 11069-006-0004-z. Kopp, R.E., Horton, R.M., Little, C.M., Mitrovica,J.X., Oppenheimer, M., Rasmussen, D.J., Strauss, B.H., and Tebaldi, C. 2014. Probabilistic 21st and 22nd century sea-level projections at a global network of tide-gauge sites. Earth's Future. 2(8). 383-406. doi:10.1002/2014EF000239. Morlighem, M., Rignot, E., Mouginot,J.,Seroussi, H., & Larour, E. 2014. Deeply incised submarine glacial valleys beneath the Greenland ice sheet. Nature Geoscience, 7(6), 418-422. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Warming seas and melting ice sheets." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 26 August 2015. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/08/150826111112.htm Nevada Geodetic Laboratory. 2015. "CHIN Station Data" http://geodesy.u n r.edu/NG LStation Pages/stations/CH I N.sta 17 NOAA, 2015. "Mean Sea Level Trend, 8724580 Key West, Florida." http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends station.shtml?stnid=8724580 NOAA, 2014. Sea Level Rise and Nuisance Flood Frequency Changes around the United States. Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 073. Sweet W. V., Park J., Marra J., Zervas C., Gill S. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/N OAA_Technical_Report_NOS_COOPS_073.pdf Obeysekera, J. and Park, J. 2013. Scenario-based projection of extreme sea levels. Journal of Coastal Research. Vol. 29, Issue 1, 1-7. Overduin, P., Grigoriev, M.N., Schirrmeister, L., Wetterich, S., Natscher, V., Gunther, F., Liebner, S., Knoblauch, C. and Hubberten, H. W. 2014. Permafrost degradation and methane release in the central Laptev Sea. 4th European Conference on Permafrost, Evora. 18 June 2014 - 21 June 2014. Park,J. and Sweet, W. 2015. Accelerated sea level rise and Florida Current transport. Ocean Sci., 11, 607-615, doi:10.5194/os-11-607-2015. Parris, A., Bromirski, P., Burkett, V., Cayan, D., Culver, M., Hall,J., Horton, R., Knuuti, K., Moss, R., Obeysekera, J., Sallenger, A., and Weiss, J. 2012. Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the US National Climate Assessment. NOAA Tech Memo OAR CPO-1. Pritchard, H. D., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Fricker, H. A., Vaughan, D. G., Van den Broeke, M. R., & Padman, L. 2012. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature, 484(7395), 502-505. Rahmstorf, S., Feulner, G., Mann, M. E., Robinson, A., Rutherford, S., & Schaffernicht, E. J. 2015. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nature Climate Change. Rampal, P., Weiss,J., Dubois, C., & Campin,J. M. 2011. IPCC climate models do not capture Arctic sea ice drift acceleration: Consequences in terms of projected sea ice thinning and decline. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978-2012), 116(C8). Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., van den Broeke, M.R., Monaghan, A., and Lenaerts,J. 2011. Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophysical Research Letters. 38. L05503. doi:10.1029/2011GL046583. Rye, C. D., Garabato, A. C. N., Holland, P. R., Meredith, M. P., Nurser, A. G., Hughes, C. W., ... & Webb, D.J. 2014. Rapid sea-level rise along the Antarctic margins in response to increased glacial discharge. Nature Geoscience, 7(10), 732-735. 18 Salas, J. and Obeysekera, J. 2014. Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events. J. Hydrol. Eng., 19(3), 554-568. Sallenger, A.H., Doran, K.S., and Howd, P.A. 2012. Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America. Nature Clim. Change. 2(12). 884-888.doi:10.1038/nclimate1597. Santamaria-Gomez, A., Gravelle, M., Collilieux, X., Guichard, M., Miguez, B.M., Tiphaneau, P., Woppelmann, G. 2012. Mitigating the effects of vertical land motion in tide gauge records using a state-of-the-art GPS velocity field, Global and Planetary Change. 98-99. 6-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.07.007. Schuur, E.A.G., Abbott, B.W., Bowden, W.B., Brovkin, V., Camill, P., Canadell, J.G., Chanton, J.P., Chapin, F.S., Ill, Christensen, T.R., Ciais, P., Crosby, B.T., Czimczik, C.I., Grosse, G., Harden, J., Hayes, D.J., Hugelius, G., Jastrow, J.D., Jones, J.B., Kleinen, T., Koven, C.D., Krinner, G., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D.M., McGuire, A.D., Natali, S.M., O'Donnell, J.A., Ping, C.L., Riley, W.J., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V.E., Sannel, A.B.K., Schadel, C., Schaefer, K., Sky, J., Subin, Z.M., Tarnocai, C., Turetsky, M.R., Waldrop, M.P., Walter Anthony, K.M., Wickland, K.P., Wilson, C.J., Zimov, S.A., 2013. Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change. Climatic Change. 119. 2. 359-374. Smeed, D.A., McCarthy, G.D., Cunningham, S.A., Frajka-Williams, E., Rayner, D., Johns, W.E., Meinen, C.S., Baringer, M.O., Moat, B.I., Duchez, A., and Bryden, H.L. 2014. Observed decline of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation 2004-2012. Ocean Sci. 10. 29-38. doi:10.5194/os- 10-29-2014. Snay, R., Cline, M., Dillinger, W., Foote, R., Hilla,S., Kass, W., Ray,J., Rohde,J., Sella, G., and Soler, T. 2007. Using global positioning system-derived crustal velocities to estimate rates of absolute sea level change from North America tide gauge records. J. Geophys. Res. 112. B04409. d o i:10.1029/2006)B004606. Spence, P., Griffies, S.M., England, M.H., Hogg, A.M., Saenko, O.A., Jourdain, N.C. 2014. Rapid subsurface warming and circulation changes of Antarctic coastal waters by poleward shifting winds. Geophysical Research Letters. 41. 4601-4610. doi:10.1002/2014GL060613. Sweet, W.V. and Park,J. 2014. From the extreme to the mean: Acceleration and tipping points of coastal inundation from sea level rise. Earth's Future, 2: 579-600. doi:10.1002/2014EF000272. Talpe, M., Nerem, R.S., and Lemoine, F. 2014. G21C-02 Two decades of ice melt reconstruction in Greenland and Antarctica from time-variable gravity.Amer.Geophysical Union,Abstract G21C- 02, Ann. Natl. Mtg. Tebaldi, C., Strauss, B.H., Zervas, C. E. 2012. Modelling sea level rise impacts on storm surges along US coasts. Environ. Res. Lett. 7 (2012) 11 pp. 19 USACE. 2015. USACE Sea Level Change Curve Calculator (2015.46) http://www.corpsclimate.us/ccaceslcurves.cfm USACE. 2013. Incorporating sea level change in civil works programs. Department of the Army Regulation No. 1100-2-8162, 31 December 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CE, Washington D.C. USACE. 2011. Sea-Level Change Considerations in Civil Works Programs. Department of the Army Engineering Circular No. 1165-2-212, 1 October 2011. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CE, Washington, D.C. Velicogna, I., T. C. Sutterley, and M. R. van den Broeke. 2014. Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica using GRACE time-variable gravity data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 41. 8130-8137. doi:10.1002/2014GL061052. Vinther, B. M., Buchardt, S. L., Clausen, H. B., Dahl-Jensen, D., Johnsen, S. J., Fisher, D. A., ... & Svensson,A. M. 2009. Holocene thinning of the Greenland ice sheet. Nature,461(7262), 385-388. Watson, C.S., White, N.J., Church,J.A., King, M.A., Burgette, R.J. & Legresy, B. 2015. Unabated global mean sea-level rise over the satellite altimeter era. Natrure Climate Change, 5, 565-568. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v5/n6/full/nclimate2635.html Wdowinski, S., Bray, R., Kirtman, B., and Wu, Z. 2015. Increasing flooding frequency and accelerating rates of sea level rise in Miami Beach, Florida. Submitted, Envir. Res. Let. Yin,J., Schlesinger, M.E., and Stouffer, R.J. 2009. Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States. Nature Geosci. 2(4). 262-266. doi:10.1038/ngeo462. http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n4/suppinfo/ngeo462 S1.html. 20 54DUTHEAST "11111114t il) REGIONAL COMPACT } CHANGE eto re k ts % A i. RD 4.C.'\--Ns, _ 1.,„ 1 ' 4 IAM I-E A E 1 ', , COUNTY (r.ic:-/ 6. 1:a4;) 1‘. • b APPENDIX A: STAND ALONE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT AND PROJECTION The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact's 2015 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection is presented below showing the anticipated range of sea level rise for the region from 1992 to 2100 (Figure 1). The projection highlights three planning horizons: 1) Short term, by 2030, sea level rise is projected to be 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level; 2) Medium term, by 2060, sea level rise is projected to be 14 to 26 inches above 1992 mean sea level with the less likely possibility of extending to 34 inches; 3) Long term, by 2100, sea level rise is projected to be 31 to 61 inches above 1992 mean sea level with the less likely possibility of extending to 81 inches. The Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida include three curves, named after the global sea level rise curves from which they were derived: the NOAA High Curve (orange solid), the USACE High Curve (blue solid) and the median of the IPCC ARS scenario (blue dashed). The blue shaded area represents the likely range of sea level rise for our region. The orange curve represents a condition that is possible but less likely. The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference (green dashed curve). This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect the impact on sea level from the current emissions trends. When determining how to apply the projection curves, the user needs to consider the nature, value, interconnectedness, and life cycle of the infrastructure in question.The following guidance is provided for using the projection. 21 • The shaded zone between the IPCC AR5 median curve and the USACE High is recommended to be generally applied to most projects within a short to long-term planning horizon, especially those with a design life expectancy of less than 50 years. The designer of a type of infrastructure that is easily replaced, has a short lifespan, is adaptable, and has limited interdependencies with other infrastructure or services must weigh the potential benefit of designing for the upper blue line with the additional costs. Should the designer opt for specifying the lower curve, he must consider the consequences of under designing for the potential likely condition. • The uppermost boundary of the projection (orange curve) should be utilized for planning of critical infrastructure to be constructed after 2060 or projects with a long design life (more than 50 years) as a conservative estimate of potential sea level rise. Critical projects include those which are not easily replaceable or removable, have a long design life (more than 50 years), or are interdependent with other infrastructure or services. If failure of the infrastructure would have catastrophic impacts on the economy, community or environment, it should be considered critical. To reference the projection to the current year i.e. 2015, simply subtract the values listed in the table below from the projected sea level rise. For example, based on the projection, sea level rise in 2030 will be 6 to 10 inches above 1992 mean sea level. In order to determine how much rise will occur relative to the current year, 2015, the values listed in the table below for the IPCC AR5 median and USACE High curves can be subtracted from the projected range i.e. 6-3=3 inches for the lower end of the range and 10-4.3=5.6 inches for the upper end of the range, respectively. The projection can be restated as such: sea level will rise 3 to 5.6 inches from this year (2015) to 2030. IPCC AR5 Median USACE High NOAA High Current Year (Blue Dashed Line) (Blue Solid Line) (Orange Line) 2015 3 4.3 5.3 2016 3.1 4.7 5.6 2017 3.4 4.9 6 2018 3.5 5.3 6.4 2019 3.7 5.5 6.8 To convert local relative sea level rise datum from mean sea level to a topographic reference point used in surveying land elevations (NAVD 88), add the number listed in the table below to projected sea level rise: 22 To convert relative sea To convert relative sea Mean High Mean Low level rise datum from level rise datum from Water Water mean sea level to feet mean sea level to inches (MHW) (MLW) NAVD 88*,add the number NAVD 88,add the number below to value from below to value from projection projection Mean lea Level in Inches Inches NAVD Inches %i��N ,r, /.;.;,,.. 4i� 4! r, � 88 NAVD 88 Key West -0.87 -10.4 -5.6 -14.2 Vaca Key -0.83 -10 -5.6 -14.2 Miami -0.96 -11.5 3.0 -26.5 ................. Beach Lake Worth -0.95 -11.4 4.9 -27.8 Pier *North American Vertical Datum of 1988(NAVD 88)is the topographic reference point used in surveying land elevations. By definition it is the vertical control datum of orthometric height established for vertical control surveying in the United States of America based upon the General Adjustment of the North American Datum of 1988. Alternatively, the USACE Sea Level Change Curve Calculator (Version 2018.88) (USACE, 2015) found at this website http://www.corpsclimate.us/ccaceslcurves.cfm can be used to change datums, reference years and tide gauge locations. The projection curves were generated using this tool. The equations used for the curves comprising the unified sea level rise projection are as follows: •: NOAA High Curve (Parris, 2012) and USACE High Curve (USACE, 2013): E(t2)-E(ti)=a(t2—ti) +b(t22—t12) where E(t2) — E(ti) = Eustatic sea level change (m) with reference year of 1992; ti = difference in time between current year or construction date and 1992 e.g. 2015-1992 = 23 years; t2=difference in time between future date of interest and 1992 i.e. 2060-1992 = 68 years; where a is a constant equal to 0.0017 mm/yr, representing the rate of global mean sea level change, 23 and b is a variabe equal to 1.56x10-4 for the NOAA High Curve; 1.13x10-' for the USACE high curve, representing the acceleration of sea level change. •: IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 Median Curve (IPCC, 2013): E(t2)—E(ti)=0.00/7(t2—ti) + (4.684499x105)(t22—tl2) :• The NOAA Intermediate Low/ USACE Low curve that is not part of the projection but included on the graph for reference (green dashed line) can be derived as follows: E(t2)—E(ti)=0.00/7(t2—ti) + (2.71 262x1 05)(t22—t12) The equations above are global mean sea level rise projections. In order to adapt the curves for regional use, the average rate of mean sea level rise or "a" value is adjusted. For example, to reference the above equations to the Key West tide gauge, a equals 0.0022 mm/yr. 24 80 ;_ Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, 2015) 7L J IPCC AR5 � USACE High NOAA High 60 Year Median (inches) (inches) 3, (inches) c 5 ro cv cu 2030 6 10 12 ° 40 2060 14 26 34 11 :: 2100 31610,"0"0.70,07 .rte r r ro cc L 10„ • ,,.�.. '___.. �• ;..-- --- T- U10SE intermediate/NOAA Low Err ,..r+ •l�,---r r► ' 0 1992 2000. 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year Figure A-1:Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge.The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC AR5 scenario as the lowest boundary(blue dashed curve), the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060(solid blue line),and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use(orange solid curve).The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030,2060 and 2100. The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference(green dashed curve).This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. 25 0111. r APPENDIX B: STATE OF SCIENCE UPDATE ACCELERATION OF SEA LEVEL RISE A statistically significant acceleration of sea level rise has been documented in the latter half of the 20th century continuing through recent years (Church and White, 2011; Calafat and Chambers, 2013; Hay et al. 2015; IPCC, 2013; Watson et al., 2015). Hay et al. (2015) reported the global sea level rise rate from 1901 to 1990 to be 1.2 +1- 0.2 mm/yr (a value which had been overestimated in previous studies). Since 1993, an increase in the average global mean sea level rise rate has been observed (Hay et al., 2015; Watson et al., 2015). Watson et al. (2015) has most recently reported the average global mean sea level rise rate to be more than double the rate of the previous century, indicating an acceleration;the observed rate was 2.6+0.4 mm/yr from 1993 to 2015 with an acceleration of 0.04 mm/yr2. This acceleration indicates sea level will rise more rapidly in the future than it has historically. The global and regional processes driving sea level rise and its acceleration are discussed in the following sections. FACTORS INFLUENCING SEA LEVEL RISE GLOBAL PROCESSES In 2011, the Work Group noted studies describing a variety of reinforcing (positive) feedbacks that are accelerating ice sheet melt in Greenland and Antarctica and also accelerating Arctic pack ice melt, permafrost thaw and organic decay, and methane hydrate release from the warming Siberian Shelf, in addition to other global processes affecting sea level rise i.e. increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changes in volcanic forcing and tropospheric aerosol loading (Compact, 2011). Since then, numerous additional reinforcing feedbacks have been documented and previously recognized feedbacks have intensified. ACCELERATION OF ICE MELT Accelerated melting of the ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica (Rignot et al., 2011; Talpe et al., 2014) is expected to be the predominant factor affecting sea level rise acceleration during the 21st Century. Melting is caused by increasing temperatures and warming of the atmosphere, warm currents moving along the coast of Greenland, and warm ocean water moving under and up into ice sheets through deep outlet glacial fjords in Antarctica. Recent observations have indicated ice sheets are more vulnerable to melting than previously realized due to the extent of deep valleys within the ice sheets connecting warmer ocean water to the internal areas of the ice sheets thus causing rapid melting and peripheral thinning (Jenkins et al., 2010; Jacobs et al., 2011; Morlighem et al., 2014; Rignot et al., 2014; Greenbaum et al., 2015). Accelerated melting results in large discharges of fresh water which raises the local sea level near the ice sheets (8 26 inches around Antarctica over past 20 years) (Rye et al., 2014). This release of freshwater has resulted in a seasonal increase in the amount of sea ice in the Antarctic (Bintanja et al., 2013; Rye et al., 2014) and slower circulation of North Atlantic surface water, also known as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Rahmstorf et al., 2015). The slowdown in circulation may contribute to increased local sea level rise along the Florida coast, as discussed in the Regional/ Local Processes section. The IPCC projections do not include the factors related to acceleration of ice melting processes described above, and as a result are likely an underestimate of future sea level rise (Rignot et al., 2011). ICE SHEET DISINTEGRATION Indicators of ice sheet disintegration include retreat of the ice sheet's outer boundary and rapid thinning. Lateral flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet margin, the outer boundary, has dramatically accelerated in the past two decades in response to surface melt waters penetrating fractures in the ice and warming and softening the ice (Bell et al., 2014). In addition to retreat, the ice sheets have initiated a rapid thinning process due to basal melt (Pritchard et al., 2012), signaling the initiation of prolonged ice sheet degradation based on historic analysis (Johnson et al., 2014). Joughin et al. (2011) have used numerical models to look at the sensitivity of the outlet glaciers of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to ocean water melt and have concluded that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse is already underway; the extent of the collapse in the future is not yet known. As part of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite monitoring program, ice sheet mass loss has been quantified as 280±58 gigatons per year (Gt/yr) from Greenland and up to 180±10 Gt/yr in Antarctica (Velicogna et al., 2014). As a reference for the magnitude of a gigaton, one could estimate one gigaton to equal the mass of over one hundred million elephants. In addition, significant recent work was completed to verify the estimated contribution of ice sheet disintegration to sea level rise using satellite data (Jacob et al., 2012; King et al., 2012; Gardner et al., 2013) with the conclusion that ice sheet melt accounted for 29±13% of sea level rise from 2003 to 2009 (Gardner, 2013). In order to further refine the estimates and projections of the magnitude of ice sheet degradation and their contribution to sea level rise, the complex dynamics driving ice sheet melt need to be better understood, in particular the mechanisms driving interactions between ice sheets and warm currents. WARM CURRENTS In 2011, the Work Group acknowledged the effects of warm ocean water currents accelerating summer pack ice melt and causing melting beneath the outlet glaciers. Recent work has further clarified the compounding mechanisms driving the flow and temperature changes of warm currents. Spence et al. (2014) analyzed the poleward shift in direction of the southern hemisphere westerly winds since the 1950's and simulated the intense warming of coastal waters 27 associated with such a shift in order to explain and forecast the significant temperature increase in ocean waters interacting with the base of ice sheets and floating ice shelves. This study serves to validate the projection of the persistence of this wind trend and the resulting melting due to warm current interaction. Separate from wind forcing, an increase in ocean surface stress due to thinning of the formerly consolidated sea-ice cover near Antarctica is proposed to result in a redirection of warm ocean currents into submarine glacial troughs and further expediting melting of the deep ice-shelf base based on ocean-ice modeling (Hellmer et al., 2012). Ice sheet melt as a result of interaction with warm currents is one of the dominant factors contributing to recent global sea level rise (IPCC, 2013); however, as discussed in the next section, land based contributions to global warming may further exacerbate sea level rise in the future. THAWING PERMAFROST The potential for significant additional emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from thawing permafrost and the rate of occurrence continues to be investigated. The intricate feedback mechanisms associated with permafrost are not well understood; as such, the IPCC did not include permafrost thaw in its projections (Collins et al., 2013). This deficiency was criticized publicly due to the theorized potential for permafrost carbon emissions to exceed emissions from fossil fuel use. Schuur et al. 2013 conducted a survey of experts to quantify permafrost change in response to four global warming scenarios and found despite risk for significant contributions of emissions from thawing, fossil fuel combustion was likely to remain the main source of emissions and climate forcing until 2100 based on the proposed warming scenarios. Following the release of the IPCC(2013) report, demand for research to understand the dynamics of the physical and chemical permafrost processes has increased in order to confirm the estimates of emissions from thawing. As an initial step, the occurrence of significant submarine permafrost thawing was confirmed by Overduin et al. (2014) when 8 to 10°C of warming within the permafrost layer was observed in less than 1,000 years, resulting in a degradation of ice- bearing permafrost at the rate of 3 cm/yr. In addition, seawater seeping through soil pores was identified as the source of sulfate necessary to oxidize methane in the upper layer of the thawing permafrost.Although site specific, studies such as Overduin et al. (2014)will begin to provide the information necessary to incorporate permafrost thawing into models and projections in the near future. REGIONAL/ LOCAL PROCESSES VERTICAL LAND MOVEMENT Vertical earth movements, which regionally and locally modify the globally averaged rate of sea level change, result in a relative rate of change that varies from one location to another. These 28 A land motions have been inferred from historical tide data and geodesic measurements. When added to projected rates of global mean sea level rise, they result in a perceived change ranging from increased rise in regions of subsidence (e.g., New Orleans) to falling sea levels where the land is being uplifted (e.g., along the northern border of the Gulf of Alaska). Other regions are geologically stable and have only small differences with respect to the global rate of change. In South Florida, in general, coastal land elevations are considered to be relatively stable meaning that the land is not experiencing significant uplift nor subsidence. It is also important to note,the vertical land movement that is occurring is non-uniform across South Florida and movement measured at specific monitoring stations sites may not reflect vertical land movement in adjacent areas. The Continuously Operating Reference (COR) network of permanent Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers provides precise measurements of vertical land movement in four locations throughout Southeast Florida (Key West, Virginia Key, Pompano Beach, and Palm Beach) over periods of nine to eleven years. Additional continuous GPS measurements have been acquired in eight other sites in the region over various time periods (two to eleven years). Precise analysis of these data reveals negligible vertical movements at most stations (less than 1 mm/yr) (Snay et al., 2007;Santamaria-Gomez et al.,2012; NGL,2015). However,some stations show 1 to 6 mm/yr of subsidence, reflecting mostly local unstable conditions of the GPS antenna monument (e.g., local building movements) (e.g., Bock et al., 2012). National Geodetic Survey has operated continuous GPS stations at Key West, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Palm Beach Gardens. The GPS data of these sites were processed by the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory, who presents the results at GPS time series (http://geodesy.unr.edu/index.php). The rates of vertical land movement at these stations are shown in Table 1 (Blewitt et al., 2015). It should be noted vertical land movement is non-uniform across South Florida as a result of geology variations and the non-uniform compaction of fill placed during development of the region. Subsidence at tide stations is closely monitored to ensure the accuracy of sea level rise measurements.The regional rate of sea level rise is affected by such localized subsidence and is accounted for in the regional sea level rise acceleration variable incorporated in the projections adapted for the region. 29 Table 1: Continuous GPS Operation in Southeast Florida (Blewitt et al., 2015) Site Location Duration Vertical rate (mm/yr) KYW1 Boca Chica Key 1997-2008 -0.5 ±0.1 KYW5 Boca Chica Key 2007-present 0.1 ± 0.1 KYW6 Boca Chica Key 2007-preset 1.0 ±0.1 (uplift) KWST Key West airport 2003-present -1.5 ± 0.1 Key West, 500 m south of CHIN -1 6 0.5 tide gauge 2008-presnt ± tl...h'tlMMa.nvnAAtq'aHau.P:;vAnx:aerw.Pumm'.,4e^•M.�*uvu.w..n.rr.... .............n...... ........`..k......... .... .. Fort Lauderdale Executive 2005-2014; LAUD -0.5± 1.1 Airport 2014-2015 E : 2004-2008, ZMA1 Miami Airport °' m ' 0.2± 0.9 2008 p - FLC6 Florida City 2009-present -1.8± 1.2 ort 'a m :eac ount ', PBCH r- .0± 1.0 (uplift) Airport Additionally, in some regions, the effects of changing ocean currents can further modify the relative local rate of sea level rise. Such is the case of the east coast of Florida, as is discussed in the next section, Ocean Dynamics, Gulfstream/Circulation OCEAN DYNAMICS, GULFSTREAM/ CIRCULATION Ocean circulation has changed little during the current period of scientific observation, but in the future it can considerably alter the relative rate of sea level rise in some regions, including Southeast Florida. A slowing of the Florida Current and Gulf Stream will result in a more rapid sea level rise along the east coast of North America. By 2100, these circulation changes could contribute an extra 8 inches of sea level rise in New York and 3 inches in Miami according to Yin et al. (2009). Most of the global climate models used by the IPCC (IPCC, 2007; 2013) project a 20- 30% weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), of which the Gulf Stream and Florida Current are a part. Measurements of the AMOC have yet to conclusively detect the beginning of this change, however there has been a report of a recent decline in AMOC strength by Smeed et al. (2014) that coincides with the mid-Atlantic hotspot of sea level rise reported by Ezer et al. (2013) and Rahmstorf et al. (2015). Recent analysis of the Florida Current transport has detected a decrease in circulation over the last decade, which appears to account 30 for 60% of South Florida sea level rise over the decade and contribute to a positive acceleration (Park and Sweet, 2015). If a long-term slowdown of the AMOC and Florida Current. Rahmstorf et al. (2015) use a proxy method also suggesting that a slowdown of the AMOC has begun. If a long-term slowdown of the AMOC does occur, sea level rise along the Florida east coast could conceivably be as much as 20 cm (8 inches) greater than the global value by 2100. According to the most recent estimates by the IPCC (IPCC 2013, FigureB-1), the combined differential due to regional ocean heating and circulation change along the Southeast Florida coast would be in the range of 10%-20% greater than the globally averaged rise by 2090. For a median (50% probability) sea level rise of one meter by 2100, this would give about 10-20 cm (4- 8 inches) of additional rise along the Southeast Florida coast, which is within the range of estimates by Yin et al. (2009). However, the IPCC models do not have the horizontal resolution required to effectively estimate these changes at the scale of the Florida Current and more research with higher resolution ocean models will be required.As such, it is prudent to add —15% to the global mean sea level rise values projected by the IPCC in order to use them for Southeast Florida planning. This adjustment is accounted for in the regional sea level rise coefficients incorporated in the projections adapted for the region. 31 Percentage Deviation from Global Mean: Figure 3.21 of Ch.13,AR5 , , -7` 1 ri) y 114tOL't''' 1 \ :‘ 1 .,7\:\ro ti17 1 40 (7 , /IN\l‘ r'\A N,Lf."---t' ....._ •1 3 0 3 .{gpldN,,w20 T ,`O 0 7 , +.. 0 \ \, a\oj . Ca ') 1 , I ' 7, A T -\----_,i--4, Jnr f \is, erl' / ,ri i' \ .1 ,7', \ •,i`b .°) 4''''4:1' 4P +1ti \\''''',,—.\0/ 4.‘''' '''''' °':41' ' ';'''4a1" "?' 4:!'%,*',/ 4,' ..9P 41, 4.' 'Z'' 4::". 41,, 4,r7' 4,' A,11%, Figure B-1. Percentage of the deviation of the ensemble mean regional relative sea level change between 1986-2005 and 2081-2100 from the global mean value, based on Figure 13.21, IPCC (2013). The figure was computed for RCP4.5, but to first order is representative for all Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP). RCPs are the four greenhouse gas concentration trajectories adopted by the IPCC for its fifth Assessment Report (AR5). 32 APPENDIX C: WORKGROUP COMMENTARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following are recommendations made by the Work Group for consideration by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact Steering Committee to be used by the Compact Counties as part of the implementation of the Regional Climate Change Action Plan. a. The unified SE FL sea level rise projection will need to be reviewed as the scientific understanding of ice melt dynamics improves. The projection should be revised within five years of final approval of this document by the Southeast Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee. This timing is consistent with the release of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report which will provide a synthesis of the major findings in climate science to date. b. Users of the projection should be aware that at any point of time, sea level rise is a continuing trend and not an endpoint. c. The planet is currently on a high emissions trajectory for which committed sea level rise is probably near the high end of the ranges. It should also be noted that the attenuation of impacts through mitigation will not likely be sufficient to overcome the inertia of the climate system prior to 2060. d. Full and complete transparency of the projection and its implications should be promoted across the communities in order to encourage and guide effective and realistic planning, obtain realistic economic realities for maintaining functional infrastructure, insuring social and economically sound further development, and necessary adaptation. e. Further work to develop projections for the occurrence of extreme events in tandem with sea level rise may be necessary to assist communities in planning for storm drainage adaptation. 33 APPENDIX D: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARTICIPANTS The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Counties (Monroe, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties) and their partners wish to acknowledge the Work Group participants and members of the SE FL Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee for participating in meetings to support the development of the Unified Sea Level Rise Projection and the guidance document. The following members contributed to the development and refinement of the projection: Danchuk, Samantha, Ph.D., P.E. Berry, Leonard, Ph.D. Enfield, David, Ph.D. Gassman, Nancy, Ph.D. Harlem, Peter, Ph.D. Hefty, Nichole Heimlich, Barry Jurado,Jennifer, Ph.D. Kivett, Jeff, P.E. Landers, Glenn, P.E. Murley, Jim Obeysekera, Jayantha, Ph.D., P.E. Park, Joseph, Ph.D., P.E. Steelman, Marcia, C.F.M Van Leer, John, Ph.D. Wanless, Hal, Ph.D. Wdowinski, Shimon, Ph.D. 34 APPENDIX E: DEVIATION FROM 2011 PROJECTION The updated unified sea level rise projection includes the range projected by the 2011 unified sea level rise projection with three enhancements. As described in previous paragraphs, the yearthe projection begins was shifted from 2010 to 1992. Since the projection now references the sea level rise that has occurred since 1992 instead of 2010, the values in the projection are larger as a result of the sea having 8 more years to rise. For example, at the lower boundary of the projection, by 2030, sea level rise is projected to be 5 inches above the where mean sea level was in 1992. This is the exact same projected elevation as 3 inches above where the mean sea level was in 2010,just a different elevation datum. Table 1 shows the adjustment of values from the 2011 Unified Projection with a reference (starting) year of 1992. Please note the lower boundary is the same in both the 2011 and 2015 projections. The second enhancement to the projection was the extension of the projection past 2060 continuing to 2100. The third enhancement to the projection was the addition of the NOAA High Curve as the upper boundary after Year 2060. For critical infrastructure projects with design lives in excess of 50 years, use of the upper curve is recommended with planning values of up to 34 inches in 2060 and up to 81 inches in 2100. Table 2: Comparison of Unified Projection in 2011 and 2015 at Key West 2011 Unified 2011,Unified Projection Projection 2015 Proposed Unified Projection Year (adjusted to reference (referenced to Year 1992) (referenced to Year 2010) _____ (inches above msl) Year 1992) (inches above msl) (inches above msl) NOAA :CC AR5 "USACE NOAA Cu rve I Curve III Curve I - �` Curve III -%_ 1987 1987 1987 (1987) ti Int. Low Median High High : 1992 0 0 ' 0 ,; ,; 0 0 ilk Ad 2030 3 7 ti 11111.111111.1 111W5 Ilk Mil y, 1111111111111111111111111 21C0 9 24 - ,- 11 : 26 i 14 4 2075 y� 15 20 i 38 49 2100 ltiffilifili j'31 61` 81 35 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ) ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS PROJECTS 2017-129-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: MARCH 24, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: APRIL 24, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: � MIAMIBEACH Kristy Bada, Contracting Officer III PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 I www.miamibeachfl.gov MI AM BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 28 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 30 APPENDIX G SAMPLE CONTRACT 32 RFQ 2017-129-KB 2 G /V BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the"City"), as the means forros ective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of P P Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the p ry Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s] )„ if this RFQ results in an award. The Cityutilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City purchases treated potable water from Miami/Dade County, and resales it to its customers. There are multiple connections to the Miami/Dade County water transmission system. The City collects wastewater from its customers, including satellite cities, and conveys it to Miami/Dade County for treatment. This RFP is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). The City provided (at its most recent count) potable water service to an estimated 10,414 domestic retail water accounts, and to approximately 2,958 irrigation (water-only) accounts. Expressed on an equivalent residential unit pp ("ERU”) basis, the System provided service to about 29,001 domestic water ERUs and 8,443 irrigation ERUs. An ERU average represents the capacity for a single-family residential account (served by a 5/8-inch meter), and is p used to measure the total customer base on an equivalent basis (how many total equivalent households are being served) since a significant number of customers may represent a single account that serves a large group of customers (e.g., a condominium), or commercial customer that uses a large amount of water (e.g., a hospital or school). The ERUs were based on information published by the American Water Works Association regarding meter capacities, and which form the basis for the determination of meter equivalent factors. The City provided (at its most recent count) sanitary sewer service to an estimated 10,414 retail sanitary sewer accounts, and 29,001 sanitarysewer ERUs (all domestic water customers receive sanitary sewer service). The City City provides wholesale sanitary sewer to the Village of Bal Harbour, the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, the C ty of North Village, and the Town of Surfside(collectively,the"Satellite Cites"). The City over is 100 years old, and many of its infrastructure assets are believed to be aged, including installations . completed earlyin the City's inception. Improvements, and expansions have been made throughout the City's P tY history, a comprehensive rehensive review of the entire water, and wastewater infrastructure needs to be performed. It is p the City'sdevelop,intention to develo , and implement a long-term capital improvement plan to best position the community with a resilient, robust, environmentally responsible, and future proof, water, and wastewater system to serve into perpetuity. Additionally, it is important that Proposers shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to p tY. Y p climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partneringwith the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. RFQ 2017-129-KB 3 m /\A I„AJ\A B E AC F Through this RFQ, the City desires to receive proposals from qualified firms that can provide professional services, in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The City may, after considering proposals received, award contracts for services to a prime consultant(s),as well as create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants, as follows: 1. Prime Consultant(s).The City may make an award to qualified consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant on its long term capital improvement projects for water and wastewater.The selected prime consultant shall provide the City with subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its water and wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant, it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest. gg Additionally,the City reserves the right to engage other consultants, either through option 2 below or through other means, to assist the City in its water and wastewater endeavors. The prime consultant shall be selected in accordance with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act for related projects as defined in Section 287.055(2)(f)(2), Florida Statutes. As such, the scope or value of the work awarded to the prime consultant shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes. 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants. Additionally, to assist with smaller engagements relating to water and wastewater work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants (not selected in Option 1 above) in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible toP ar icipate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. The process for considering qualifications proposals shall be as follows: 1. City will consider proposals received on or before the due date. 2. All responsive proposals will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager for evaluation in accordance with the criteria established herein. Proposals deemed non-responsive will not be considered by the Evaluation Committee. 3. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section 19 below, one (1) or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. 4. The City intends to contract with a single prime proposer, but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers, in accordance with Subsection 2.1 above. There is no project value limit on the work to be performed by the prime consultant. 5. Other responsive, responsible and best qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Subsection 2.2 above. Projects awarded to consultants in the continuing pool shall be limited to$200,000 for studies and design or engineering services shall be limited to projects with construction budgets under$2 million. GIVEN THAT THE CITY INTENDS TO AWARD A PRIME CONSULTANT AND ALLOW OTHER RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE AND QUALIFIED PROPOSERS TO BE INCLUDED IN A CONTINUING POOL OF PREQUALIFIED CONSULTANTS,ALL QUALIFIED FIRMS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND TO \THIS RFQ RFQ 2017-129-KB 4 r ,ia h { BASH F....k i i i `W e 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued March 24,2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting April 5,2017 at 10:00AM Deadline for Receipt of Questions April 14,2017 at 5:00PM Responses Due April 24, 2017 at 3:00PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA• MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV Additional)Y, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranado(a�miamibeachfl.gov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S).Only if deemed necessary by the City,a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s)may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFP Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3RD Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow P these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER:5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. RFQ 2017-129-KB 5 FACH 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any rospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES .. CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION'2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, maynot submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or tY public work, maynot submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with anypublic entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject to,and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation,disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. RFQ 2017-129-KB 6 C-4. 1' BEACH 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of g the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) Y Pdays upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters(five (5)days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17.NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374,the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are , responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the p service-disabled veteran business enterprise. RFQ 2017-129-KB 7 CP_ RACH 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) p s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals, include prime consultant(s) and continuing pool of prequalified consultant(s). The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2- 369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer(s)to determine the prime consultant(s). Other proposers not selected as prime consultant that are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified, as recommended by the City Manager and approved City Commission, are eligible to participate in the continuing pool of prequalified consultants. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. The City may impose a ceiling on hourly rates to be g allowed under the contract. Firms that do not accept the ceiling on rates may be eliminated from further consideration. 21. POSTPONEMENT/CANCELLATION/ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty calendar days after proposal opening date.A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for makingany and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. RFQ 2017-129-KB 8 ‘w E//1,,' v'\\ BEACH exp23. enses COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, ro osed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will P P be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for,or on account of, any copyrighted, patented,or unpatented invention, process,or article manufactu red or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device,or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. RFQ 2017-129-KB 9 6_11 BEACH 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer,or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and otherq ualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. RFQ 2017129-KB 10 r A' BEACH 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, includinganyor all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to 9 any person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies encies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of p government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase anygoods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation; then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided p Y by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. RFC) 2017-129-KB 11 BEACH/ k M 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and 9 Y conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date,and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any,alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS,SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities,favors,or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift,favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. RFQ 2017-129-KB 12 AssAJ\ BEACH 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Cityreserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers 9 at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2017-129-KB 13 tV,I Ai\AAM1 BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents.The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. Experience and qualifications should demonstrate the firms experience with vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and awareness of incremental adaptation over time. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. Experience and qualifications should demonstrate the firms experience with vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and awareness of incremental adaptation over time. 2.2.1 Subject Matter Expert(s). Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individual(s)who as proposed will be selected to serve as the Subject Matter Expert(s). Proposers must identify and submit evidence for the following Key Personnel: RFQ 2017-129-KB 14 t\AA/V'\t BEACH a. Water Distribution System b. Wastewater Collection System c. Water Pumping Stations d. Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations e. Water Distribution Design Engineer f. Wastewater Collection Design Engineer g. Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer h. Corrosion Control and Corrosion Remediation 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, strategies for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2017-129-KB 15 tv\ AMMIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager.The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Procurement Department. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications,including Financial Capability 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three (3) years from the due date for proposal. See Section 4 5 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 • 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2017-129-KB 16 t\A 1 1 B EAC F- 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Procurement Department. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank1 2 ! 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission,which may be different than final ranking results.The City Manager is not bound by the results of the Evaluation Committee Process. 6. Award Recommendation. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section 19, one (1) or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. The City intends to contract with a single prime proposer, but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers. All other responsive, responsible and qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants. RFQ 2017-129-KB 17 APPENDIX A MAM BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 18 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2017-129-KB WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform ros ective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,s, and to collect necessary information from P P Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and P compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2017-129-KB 19 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by Fyllic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. RFQ 2017-129-KB 20 ' • - _ ••• • •- •r •••••• ••• •• ••• • .••.. a ••1 •e• • •• ► •• • • ••••• •: • fir•• •• •• .••.. •• .•. • -. •. ..• .0 •- � r •• . .• • • •• •• • • ••• •• •• -•• • ••• 1 •• e ••• • .••••••• r•• •• •••• ••• •• •• ••• l .•• •• ---• ♦ • __• ' __.. • • ► • •••••• .:••••. • •• •• •r • ••• •• • • • ••-.•• • ••• • •- _ 71 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017-129-KB 21 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016,the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2017-129-KB 22 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its. best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disdaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2017129-KB 23 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 2017-129-KB 24 APPENDIX B i!!1:1 tsvA1AM BEACH " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note:te: it is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides ate City with information onhaw to irnprove the solicitation process. Failure to submit{fiI a 44Statement of No Bid" may result in not being natified. of future solicitations by the City. RFQ 2017-129-KB 25 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond _Specifications unclear or too restrictive - Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: KRISTY BADA STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS#2017-129-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 26 APPENDIX C iSA M1AM BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 27 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. PRIME PROPOSER: 1. The Prime Proposer (Engineering Firm) shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. REQUIRED SIMILAR EXPERIENCE: 2. The Prime Proposer shall submit no less than five (5) projects completed within the last ten (10) years completed exemplifying experience in water, and wastewater system improvement projects. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, start and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email),volume of contract, prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The Consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach on its Water and Wastewater systems. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process of making its water and wastewater systems resilient, environmentally responsible, dependable, and future proof. Proposer shall have an understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise; familiar with the work and regional planning tools of the SE Florida Climate Change Compact and aware of the City's approach to incremental adaptation over time. The City interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above. The services described in items I, and II are a priority and are intended to be awarded immediately. The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future. I. Develop Water System Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 1.Prepare a description, and general inventory of the water distribution system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to-date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing water distribution system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2.Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure.The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. II. Develop Wastewater Collection System CIP 1.Prepare a description, and general inventory of the wastewater collection system based on review of existing database, maps, plans, reports, other City records, visits with staff, and field inspections. Visit existing facilities, and prepare an accurate, up-to- date description of the system. Document all parts of the existing wastewater collection system, including facilities, condition of equipment and system components. 2.Prepare a listing of CIP projects, with planning level cost estimates, based on priority RFQ 2017-129-KB 28 developed with a matrix considering the likelihood of failure, and consequence of failure. The planning document should include approximately 20 years of work. Ill. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Master Planning IV. Water and/or Wastewater Systems Hydraulic Modeling V. Water and/or Wastewater Systems expansion and/or replacement construction design, including pumping stations VI. Construction Management VII. Value Engineering VIII. Various studies, reports, etc. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2017-129-KB 29 APPENDIX D ill MAM BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 30 1.TERM OF CONTRACT.Three(3)years. 2.OPTIONS TO RENEW.Two(2)additional one(1)year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5.INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6.PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8.SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9.DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11.BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement,work order,letter of engagement or purchase order. 13. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER.A change in the Consultant's project manager(as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the City project manager). 14. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 15. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services,deliverables and cost of services. RFQ 2017-129-KB 31 APPENDIX E ill MAM BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 32 trA MIA/V\ I BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2017-129-KB 33 APPENDIX F M AM BEACH Sample Contract RFQ No. 2017- 129-KB WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-129-KB 34 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-129-KB DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RFQ 2017-129-KB 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 37 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 42 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 46 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 48 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 48 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 49 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 50 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 51 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 51 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 51 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 53 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 53 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 54 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 54 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 54 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 55 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 59 SCHEDULE B 61 SCHEDULE C 63 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 64 ATTACHMENT B 65 ATTACHMENT C 66 RFQ 2017-129-KB 36 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR WATER &WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on , the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-129-KB for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No. - , respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. RFQ 2017-129-KB 37 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants RFQ 2017129-KB 38 acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record"for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. R !► I 1 -1 •-KB 39 DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance- oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope"shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. RFQ 2017-129-KB 40 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: 'Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. RFQ 2017-129-KB 41 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and RFQ 2017129-KB 42 Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted)shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the Cityq's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In RFQ 2017129-KB 43 addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to RFQ 2017129-KB 44 promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. RFQ 2017-129-KB 45 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and RFQ 2017-129-KB 46 acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any Subconsultants(and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission RFQ 2017-129-KB 47 on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator(which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. RFQ 2017-129-KB 48 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, 9 provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). RFQ 2017-129-KB 49 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by RFQ 2017-129-KB 50 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its RFQ 2017-129-KB 51 performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or(3)does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty(30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. RFQ 2017-129-KB 52 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. RFQ 2017-129-KB 53 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: RFQ 2017-129-KB 54 City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant RFQ 2017-129-KB 55 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. RFQ 2017-129-KB 56 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. RFQ 2017-129-KB 57 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name RFQ 2017-129-KB 58 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND RFQ 2017-129-KB 59 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT (RFQ 2017-129-KB)you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date RFQ 2017129-KB 60 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. RFQ 2017-129-KB 61 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017-129-KB 62 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS RFQ 2017-129-KB 63 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM RFQ 2017-129-KB 64 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) RFQ 2017-129-KB 65 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ RFQ 2017-129-KB 66 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ G liklill' .1 ri , ,, fi' • e a#1,' ‘,..,:,,,4,..0,.',;6a.,''''",',:;•''' .. +.,. •x :.'. v ,:. as w+„• :.:. r:...� �i:`'. a.. \1\• ... \hV\d. \\ + :.,:,. x w. lili,1)0,71.0111,11115.!...!'il;3'''''''''"''....'.''''''''',:''''''''''''''''...':' '• '•- .. ..-'''':''1.-- —;.'''''....•''''....:::-:.."'T.-;;;.;!i-,'...1.:41111.00),:.iiiiii&,:-'7,:"'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''."--'''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''." '''''''''''.: ., 1';:: �_-ate. . +�1�\.��\\11 tea,aMi `'! ,\�,..:y.arnu, .+.\,\17 ..t,..,"• ... .,�\\\\\'.\;..\\\ ��.\Cin \`\\ .aug .<„ `+\,\il•\\\\a\0*\\\'." - '`�, \N\\a„o\; +. ��\`.(.,'\\ a4..�a P\:^:\. `.\`\:�\\\a,\`a y , S Response to RFQ - 2017-129-KB Engineering Services for Water & Wastewater Systems Projects CA ENGINEERING GROUP P.A. IN ASSOCIATION WITH r�1 Erb TETRA TECH , Click the computer screen below to view our shared vision or visit @ www.300engineering.com/miamibeach MIAMI impoommy Tab 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements What MATTERS... key DIFFERENCIATORS (ilk ' . emeamliClimisChai,e s., • ,. r , C.p.,A. "'" %"''''"f,' .1..''''' Tab 1 1 .1 Cover Letter 5 1 .2 Executed Appendix A 7 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 14 Tab 2 2.1 Proposer Qualifications Company History 17 Licenses + Certifications 20 Similar Experience 30 2.2 Team Qualifications Organizational Chart 104 Subject Matter Experts 106 Resumes 108 2.3 Financial Capacity 194 Tab 3 3.1 Approach + Methodology 197 /1° 3 1:1 11 ef'.4 I Apr 1111414111/4 ; P 4 \ •• p 14044444441/4N,,,., / 04 11' / 44 4 0 C e 1 D CD C CD Ima ID n e ,.; 1 .1 Cover Letter 1 .2 Executed Appendix A 1 .3 Similar Experience 1 • , , ,, Cover Ms. Kristy Bada April 25, 2017 Contracting Officer III City of Miami Beach- Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 Subject: RFQ 2017-129-KB- Engineering Services for Water&Wastewater Systems Projects Dear Ms. Bada and Members of the Selection Committee: 300 Engineering Group, P.A. (300 Engineering) is pleased to submit our statement of qualifications for your consideration as your innovative and solutions-oriented Engineer in the field of Resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above for your water and wastewater systems. As a trusted service provider, 300 Engineering has partnered with numerous South Florida County and Municipal agencies on meaningful projects of similar scope and complexity. 300 Engineering has a reliable depth of local resources,recognized experience and technical expertise to ensure project success while protecting your investment. Throughout this proposal, we have outlined the reasons why we are the right team for your project. We assembled an unparalleled team of subject matter experts with the necessary local support to better serve the needs of the City of Miami Beach and to develop and implement a long-term capital improvement plan - with the available information and in a short period of time. We assembled a team which 1) understands your water and wastewater system vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise, 2) is willing to work 24/7 to make your system resilient,robust,environmentally responsible,and future proof,and 3) brings a fresh perspective to the City of Miami Beach. Our team consists of:Tetra Tech,a global engineering firm ranked No. 1 in Water by Engineering News-Record (ENR) for 13 consecutive years with over 16,000 employees worldwide, and 500 employees in Florida; D&B Engineers, a water and wastewater firm, operating since 1965, with expertise in underground aging infrastructure; and the FIU Sea Level Solutions Center, a group of experts in the development of adaptation strategies for communities subject to climate change/sea level rise in South East Florida, including the City of Miami Beach. This team is reliable, cohesive, efficient, and has well-established professional relationships. We have collaborated on past projects and continue to work together, achieving collective results that equate in increased client satisfaction. Our team,300 Engineering in association with Tetra Tech,offers the following key advantages to the City of Miami Beach: Members of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact - Dr. Shimon Wdowinski, one of our proposed subject matter experts, worked on the development of "the unified sea level projection for Southeast Florida", a regional planning tool of the Compact. This tool is used for planning purposes to aid in the understanding of potential vulnerabilities and provide a basis for developing risk informed adaptation strategies for the region (refer to pg. 76 for project description). Additionally, Mr. Kenneth Caban, our proposed team leader for the Master Planning group, was selected as a member of the Built Environment Work Group of the Compact, whose mission is to develop focused recommendations pertaining to regional action plan. Proven Leadership- Our team of experts will be led by Mr. Franklin A. Torrealba, an industry leader with over 31 years of experience managing the planning, design and construction of hundreds of water and wastewater projects in South Florida. Mr. Torrealba is a seasoned project manager who has delivered over 600 USEPA mandated Consent Decree projects with a track record of zero penalties. (refer to pg. 108 for his resume). He has vast experience in the areas of CIP program/project management and stands ready to work with the City from day one on the decision-making process of building its resilient water and wastewater systems. It° 5 Smart Engineering & Planning -We bring a seasoned team of professionals with the experience and expertise to work with the City in developing CIP with infrastructure projects to last for generations. Our recent experience includes the assessment and engineering of over 200 non-compliant wastewater pump stations in Miami-Dade County (refer to pgs. 32-35 for project descriptions). Moreover, Tetra Tech and 300 Engineering are currently working with the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department as their Master Planning Consultant; our team is assisting the County with a wide range of master planning services, including CIP project development, hydraulic modeling and system expansion (refer to pgs. 38 & 62 for project descriptions). This team is ready to work with you on expediting the development and implementation of your CIP. Recognized Expertise in Climate Change, Sea Level Rise, Adaptation, and Resiliency-We partnered with the FIU Sea Level Solutions Center (SLSC) to provide the City of Miami Beach with a highly-qualified team of experts for all areas of the subject RFQ. The SLSC was established to advance science of sea level change and develop sustained sea level responses in the natural-built environment. Moreover, Dr. Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, our subject matter expert and CIP team leader, has a wealth of experience as a researcher on climate change and adaptation strategies,as well as a consultant developing master plans for various local, national and international clients. Our team brings the best available research and analyses coupled with hands-on expertise to drive effective adaptation to preserve government systems and infrastructure. Water and Wastewater System Certified Operators - We incorporate the operations perspective through all facets of a project lifecycle. We provide a perfect combination of professional engineers and operators to ensure that our projects are efficient, compliant with local federal regulations,and easy to operate and maintain. We will leverage our team of senior system operators to develop and implement CIP projects to build a robust infrastructure to serve in perpetuity. Depth of Available Local Resources - This team is local. We have built a team of leaders and subject matter experts which will be supported by the 50+ professionals proposed herein. Our team's commitment to the City of Miami Beach is to be ready to start working on building your new resilient infrastructure from day one. We offer the City of Miami Beach the ability to upsize staff in a moment's notice by going through our own local workforce. This multidisciplinary team was assembled to embark with the City of Miami Beach on the development and implementation of a CIP to make your infrastructure dependable and future proof. This team has completed more local projects from inception (master planning) to closeout (construction and commission) than any other team/firm. As our qualifications demonstrate, this team has the expertise and system know-how to develop great projects to last for generations to come. We invite you to review the attached proposal and contact our references to attest to our professional experience (refer to pg. 15 for our references). We are the right team for your project. Sincerely 300 Engineering Group, P.A. ..:....... (11( Franklin A. Torrealba, PE Project Manager/Director 6 Ta b 1 .2 Executed A. .endix o'citation'o: o'citation 'e: RFQ 2017-129-KB WATER&WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSULTANT Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: KRISTY BADA 305-673-7490 KRISTYBADA• MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: 300 Engineering Group,P.A. No of Years in Business: 10 No of Years in Business Locally: 10 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Rafael J.Ballesteros,P.E.,P.A. FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 3850 Bird Road,Suite 601 CITY: Miami STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33146 TELEPHONE NO.: 305-763-9829 TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: 305-675-2373 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 3850 Bird Road,Suite 601 CITY: Miami STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33146 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Franklin A.Torrealba,P.E.,ENV SP ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-763-9829 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: fatorrealba@300engineering.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 56-2612529 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2017-129-KB 19 1r 7 ,.:.•../..,/ •.';' / / n////nFNi,n/!n// // /N/M //y r. ,/�r /,,.%�.�"�r'/ lYNN///i/i/Nu/i/ ,,,.,, .a.,,-rn,/r,u!rr•./r../•%H,!r/ir„/dai!,j/”,/�.//!?7?'/ ,........./,../,./../.!/lNrllr/L 1,d..,....,,..N..: /•r..N..:..;:IN::;.;../.H.J,,H...�,k/,./..!._,.k....'r...:,HNiN.!/././.y_-..;.,....,.....,.r.-I..,..F....,.,.....,....,...F::H/./�...�HS,//��.[//gy/p/./��///:;' i// ,./-. /, ..,,. r / / /:.: / / 0.444r.., 4,/ ,J. //‘�y�//r� U/� •r.r�n�/.:,::k,pnqa/.v.n�/•eb rN1r/er..r/.r. ,�,./_,,•r.,';/./a.:'N./r r ,,. h•/:/. /�//92'H/•////{��,..rt.,•.. ,..r4./an.'!Lr/4'/,''r.•//n./r//r,nH rr/n/r.,//.:ai/rs./I!,/'r n,/.//r//,//,r l/��/,.,.�, -/�/ !,/,..r///.//,r./,r.,.a.iA,•.r/r a�,ra, .•./., /,.•N//.I,,,r..'H,..'..,�!.•r..,r,r ...,.,...>r: ...,,.n,' .,_. PPO ��/�d;,d, r// 0//0,1 / �� /1y/r 7 // ..........,17//, / 444/, / rr,1 . va<,r�� / N// ,�// /! „ Jr y, // /,;.A440,/104 r/ r� r r• ;r /i FH/;lhin/r/,/n��/,��ON1/ii; 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES s/ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s.)of any officer,director, agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017-129-KB 20 8 Ta b •2 Execu ed A. •endix • • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012 13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.Department of Labor's same(in a particular year). at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance,as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ✓ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? V YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017-129-KB 21 ItiE 9 ,.. ,: ..,. .. :.,. ;.:1p./././/.../.:r..../,/l c�/jil/rIger Nn,�./H//n.,/"urn,//!r hawI"-„rnF„.rrrw/nrrNrur.n..ari,ar M"i,.;�/.,�_-.r/h.r.!///J../..//r/.�//,r,...r......::,.:,":., ...r.r::r:,,/.,n,....,..r•..,...,.'.. ,../..,.:.._:.;..:'.r./,:/..;.r.'....:,v.''/...'........,..,r....P/,/N'u"'i::,.. N i 'rN/ ./:..:...:.S,..., /,/....... r ya // ,., / d„ .y�/ f/4/1/4;;11114'''''"7'' /, 1 �,../,':,.,.:.....rr......, . :V r:,../..,. /r. 4M�-,'✓„./%r/.rr:u..�../p/�/6/n//,///,./r,•I f/r//d�/i/ �.,..M./4,./////40,004,' /�p/., , ,r 41011,1/ ,,/......,r.1,'..// .,.,r./rlyr::,./i u//,rr,,„,/N/N/N/I/;.I.,,.,./rr,////,4.:..y..,.L� .�.,:..,:..rr.,.,...,. ../:,..r .r.,..._r:::,✓:/./,-/rr ,/.:t.....°..✓//�.r /.",a.rr N,y,ru,n,g::r:<,_6,...,.,r.,..{.,.nv.r...:;,:.yr,,.,,.,r..,fir ., :; //. ./ ,�r9.,.,.,,,'/,'u' ,,,,,(414i/-0,4,*.,'"'? � / � 1'1 . rN// ;#/' r/ a /� /��nn r �//Vi/t /. /un. 1$14,t4,111,,/41441;20,' . . ///r: r n # , ' //. / nI . r 0404010/v/7-'11'%/ r/� L/� ,� /' / a /yr / 9 u d 4g 4/qp��H�H/#4,44gr',;c1>ki,//�I�/ 44#/,to!ni! 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted oras amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following.a conviction fora public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in.North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1,2016,the city shall not enter into a contract,resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt FAT 04/19/2017 Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFC) 2017-129-KB 22 10 Ta b 1 2 • i��... /�j Executed A. •endix DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest.In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto,are approved and executed by the parties,and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2017-129-KB 23 4r 11 ...: .. .....,.,.,,.. ..�.N._-s\n+.vn<.....•.:,,x •,:"�.:.N .,'ti,..�,\o a,gn�',ra a`v +SWUM r„, .... .. ,;F�$W,,,,4,*:,,t:', b a. A ,......:..vin.:.� h..4 w. /, ,,...., ,. .r�r /I l r ,:,....✓�.., r" ./., :;... � / // -:I, 4a t h .d:.. / ...�,...:w J f.p� I,. ...,::i,., :.....r.. .. :r:::, ,..:.r'�,,I,. ,rr r ./.: r. '..1L,..,.r '..•:N', ':�, .,: ,..,./., r:..i .,.•.v..t,.Y,._.....,.-./ ... /./.r Nr ,1!'.:.....: v...,,,..,.,•,.yn;.../::::,,...:,/r../ ,'.//Y .:.r,,..'F .../.,./( / .,/y.,...i,.,re.,.,:...W, :•,,Gic,.'.i,w,,:�.•.,. .s\ \s�,'.W...\.�.,...,,,..,.,•y.:.,a ,...` e4 x.,Sw"‘,k'''', 12::",.:;',''.,::,''';‘,,,,' i r. , a y, N,"C\,.r� . , a r , : 4 .1,�,,,,,,,e4 .: - . rrr��Hw ¢hLF .y . , . �, \:\ t \S4\Y\ r , ., ,x :.•'�,.a.'' Cjj , \ p,,„i,�(, r/ „ n .a : .�44��ie� /�lGN�.,. / ��I��%Fn I , a� \c, : AteJ�, iuSY ,f \� . � . . PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer, am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation,and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer is Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Franklin A Torrealba,PE,ENV SP Director Signature-tf;Fro se a f ui in r Representative: Date: X51 'i, / , April 21, 2017 4, f State of FLORIDA ) On this 2/day of April ,2017,personally appeared before me Franklin A Torrealba who County of Miami-Dade ) stated that (s)he is the Director of 300 Engineering Group, P.A.,a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: , e1 Aracelis Urieta (/ije4,i Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: February 27,2018 '.;.i;: r` ARACELIS URIETA MY COMMISSION#FF096682 :•.� �oP.,•. EXPIRES February 27.2018 (407)398-0153 FloridallotarvService.corn a ,:�rr✓n,'M �:YM;Fwn,w,..,:'::N�:;ry UYafyy.y`.r, :YN':.:M,�ro'Mwv.'.::�M..�.F'ti.:/./n'.a<':. W,!<::,.r'!r.vr /w,::..M.!,. �iF"..w.:':/:i:.• ....,,.rp'.w,.nrd�. n.w..'.IN Mi•.4',:„,-,.N.nv.N vL/...,.vI N,::v x.N/r:. , r.!r"....,n v /. ..� n x .............. 0 1 -1 9-KB 24 12 // Tab 1 .2 - .' ' Executed . .en e dix Response to section 3 of Appendix A: please refer to section 1.3 pg. 15 for a list of references. Response to Section 6, Appendix A: Our team will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. , .,.. >rra v/laN.,.;:i'., i r // ,N/;r ,r ,,,,,,,,,,/,/,', ,,,"9!#//,',':;,/,'I'',///'''',,'/' ,�„, /� / r /',��/ i�,n,�ry,.//P �Hiy % / „/,/,,,,,, //n/,/!,„,N/ry/, N! //:mA �!//„ n ,� ,/,„!/ o �'�//l / q/ r/i, r �� ,,#„/ Y�/„° ,, r/9�r:fi"6l/N/ inNry1� / /r 7,�Jrx , aG,„ „ „/,h9r /,, _ _ Y., fel ... • % 4.i SMV ,a M + fir'„.� ° '. a.. ^ „ „ a � ya .ry'p"-.w, .,„„,„„.„.,.,.0., J'v• d�” .ra '''00,., v ir,,, , ,„?,, ,i,, ,- , -.., *,,,,;,.L...:141..tc, . L, ...... ...... . . •,.., „,,,.,,,- ..-- . 41i.'imp wµ w f w .. '�� / Ayr ''6� "r”" 4.;„ A .. -.:. v. ". _.s. / hi..' wrAy •Aw„ r,.r .. .x ...amp, y '� '� „x' "41 istil&k:= ''''' ''4' ille • .fin aSE . �" .y - ; w.:„a/ w ... '' r,, 4: -4 'ill i ;.4°,, ' ''''''''' ' 'A t ' , . - — „,, ...... --, -,,, --,,,.., . .., .., . ,,, u , ‘ _ ,.,....„,,,.......,, _ _ , ...-- ,,,, . - , ,,,„ - ,0,e'-'-::,-..„ - _ . .. . ,,.,. t, -,,,, ,, ,0,..,...,,,0 IA iiiiimiliiiiii.„, ,, __ ,,,, *i�' �.�'�x�.'''''';;;T'''',.,"0:, '� :� a �. . ,:, '�'"+rs' a .. „� rA► ...�-..,„__. .r ,7 ,. :.. *� •.... a p"'a ,�y�tl 't�PA"N�,,x� ........:•..w....... ,,yw✓ 'S'r°'. a MMp�;'';'' Itsr;r,.;. �,, p ` ily,�.: A rA• lIF .n ,M �til' : ,^, °.:e„�!v' �'�'„-''''',,;,,'.;4��Y; "".'^xw...•!.eww.� :'�� , (;/ N�v�'$'b:fy,. _gyp .: f �,.'” ', u,�° ..d„� ,. .+. ti -„..,.. ,.,,..,..:.may ro. +” hzR �"� � �IEAr. w ° +1P ..:4 ""^0, ,A`K✓' gar .'¢,�a�a y �,., �, , ,... * 4, w ,; --- .,-440;.4*............... .w w M a'N X M Y \l/ ,: .....:.'.•+w•.......yam• f q'pK' M x .', .. a� ..„� arrY !'` n rz .'z , xdw1+` � Y ' '4,17.... . � �r+s - Z'1-!''' , A -,,,,, ' ,,,,, - ;..........._--....11., ............._ 6 ,:,,'- 13 .. ... .::..n..., �---:�.a.r.,•,.emwrnn,,v,«„R.,..„- "M1C.:.�� M,.,.„,•,,rw, ,.; w„,..�::., ,..., .... ..,.. d bs\` \Sda a+�+�,r,, \1 \ ,,,,',,,:s' , � :. ,,..,�i:,. , .��:.\!h\. ,, _ d t��a\,a��,��,)aA v� \ \a \,t.'h\ ,\,�\A: ,‘",'',!\''''''',' ay . �, ,, t,,\irvn �a\�\\ ��,,`��\\��\ � : y a��r�^at ya�a�aa�4\r`a r: , i \a,,,,,n,,,,,,f\\ r, i�\V ,1, ti�W""\\1\\, \,,, ,t•`,:\ m \i 1 "„„c'1.., `,A w.a \� \ .,a, . ..,�'""W.�v'.�.,,.. ,., �:,:,, a� \•\::c �^ .,�. ..:.,a 0 r� ri1 xr\ \! a a1 an •_ ,... w• ,, .,,,<�� ,� ,,. -,,, �,. �, ., ,.,,\\fi�n `� ..,N a, ,_ ., z. ,,, ,,,,4,:‘,,,°,,..,_:t� ., h ,,�:. ' ,H� z ^.` ,Nie\h .. � ;.:, -., s a,,... ^oir \�,y,\�;;,�, .,a. .vY+),at�N\,v.•,ya,;.;., �•.; .. ,�, 'd ),F R'�, ` c£. \ .. M a\\ hi,,,,, \Q .PAW, `e,,,.y`r .� .: .. :� a,,aa�, ,�,,\�k:. \,tea\�Ck\�'��+ Z, \ `'. \ \�q�.'C`�\��\�;; flt: ',::),,2' Na e` Y' Zai Pfd ,�k v r1 , ,,, ,: ')a ,...�. .\�, �t ,ea;;',$�ea.,\ far.,,: { r ,t. � ',,,..,44.'';'',: r. "tea ..', \s...,�, .. , \ W,'.. a •,� Ai hy. �'a.��,` C?C,.,..yR'c.'9�1{t :',w` Q ��.\\'Sad �,. ,, .. ....\, x .. ,..... .?:,. ,, .\A ..,n,\@a,.A,:,., ba+,u,,,�m:a... .v.,..vn,...e...:k.� t "� �C N \ Nih, .... ,n �, 1.... �:,., a , ., �� ,''',\,',v.,,,,, > a,,fir, a aca . A ........ .. ,w ,r\: r \ \Z, \ .,.., \ ,.. n,. \ a. ,q.,3',.., \.Cv1w+, NW. \ , ,„. , „ d ,�,,\.. 1 ., , , . ; ., '� . ,. ^^S,i\,,. \ a :.,. , rk.. \\ t',. �.r ,� 9 .,.. M.wt : , yY� ,, �Nw � :,:... ,..:. 5 i,a.,.Y ,4 .,;:,_... ... •ahaa��;, anantMmm.«�s to>n , .,..,.,).aw.wwG;1w'1wwuwS3a„)Y.i;r: , ,.,n�.a,.w;:aaAva.kd»>) w .al+r• Cl REQUIRED SIMILAR EXPERIENCE Please refer to section 2.1, Proposers Qualifications - Similar Experience pages 30-103 for our projects exemplifying experience in water and wastewater system improvement projects State o Department o I certify from the records of this office that 300 ENGINEERING GROUP,P.A. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on September 18,2006. The document number of this corporation is P06000119745. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2017,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 11,2017,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given tinder my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Eleventh day of January,2017 is:.” -'.'.' -T-1- ...'''''Cj'I'''''''' . l•--- ' '-:=1-..,'"-L."- ..\• .\ 4,1 ,....,,.,:,,.,..-.,,„: „.-,, ,...-4;,,,,,0.),...„ ..,*,,,,... ,...?._.L,.: ., 160%, ()4..J.,_ ..,..t,-,:',',,,,,-4.-„,.--x. .,...--1.-, .... \....4.,....-0,ii,,, . Secretary of State --,F,.(),!i:.-iiiii.,,__..--' Tracking Number:CC0457837260 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 14 Ta b 1 3 • ..,..... .. . , ...,,,,. „,,,.. , ,, ,., .,. , ,. ., . . ... , Minimum ! !..:;:, ,,;-:„.,...,....L. , ... . . ... s ,... �� y��I///%/'��/�y��i�a%airq/ara�r�aic;; y ,„; PROJECTS Firm Project Cost Start Date End Date Agency Name Agency Contact Phone Email $215M Pump Station Improvement Program(PSIP) 300 Engineering $215M 1/1/14 On going \NASD Rolando Roque,PE 786-552-8129 RCQUER amlamidade.gov $2.48 Program and Construction Management for 300 Engineering $2.48 6/1/14 On going WASD Dan Edwards,PE 786-232-5257 DJEDW01 4rniamidade.gov USEPA Consent Decree Projects(PMCM) Basis of Design Report(BODR)Services for Water and Abel.Femandez2gmiamidade.g Sewer Service to un-sewered Commercial and Industrial 300 Engineering $233M 3/11/16 2/15/17 WASD Abel Fernandez,PE 786-552-8933 OV Areas PortMiami Water Transmission and Distribution Systems 300 Engineering $60M 9/1/16 On going WASD Howard Fallon,PE 786-552-8225 HJFAL01 Qmiamidade.gov Master Plan WASD's Rehabilitation/Replacement of a 48-Inch FM along the Biscayne Canal between NW 57th Avenue 300 Engineering $22M 1/1/15 4/1/15 WASD Dan Edwards,PE 786-232-5257 DJEDWOI 4miamidade.gee and 32nd of Design Report(BODR) Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Computer Model 300 Engineering $2.5M 1/1/07 12/1/10 WASD Dan Edwards,PE 786-232-5257 DJEDWO1 arniamidade.goy ......_......... Wastewater Transmission System Hydraulic Computer 300 Engineering $200K 12/1/1 1 3/1/13 WASD Peter Jelonek,PE 786-552-8226 pieloOl ctrniamidade.gov Model-Wastewater Gravity Sewer Modeling WASD's Installation of 16-Inch Water Main Along NW 36'"Street from Curtiss Parkway to NW 42""Ave North of 300 Engineering $3M 12/1/15 On going WASD Eduardo Luis 786=268-5374 edisafrla.Ivisa'miamidade.gov Miami International Airport Small Water Mains Replacement Program(SWMRP), Adnan Tnana,MBA, 300 Engineenng $400K 8/1/11 2013 WASD 786-268-5414 adrian.triana4miamidade.gov Phases I and II CGC Miami-Dade water and Sewer Department$17M 300 Engineering $1M 7/1/09 6/1/12 WASD Joan Bedoya 305-254-5871 juan.bedoya4miamidade.gov Comprehensive Lateral Investigation Program(CLIP) City of Coral Gables- Jorge Acevedo,PE, City of Coral Gables wastewater Infrastructure Geographic Information System(GIS)Updates 300 Engineering $60K 1/6/16 1/10/16 Department of Public ENV SP,LEED Green 305-460-5006 JAcevedo2a coralgables.com Works Associate GIS Utility Backlog Projects 300 Engineenng $10M 8/1/14 On going WASD JoseL.Lopez,PE 786-552-8334 (Somiamidade.gov South Miami Heights Water Main Replacement and 300 Engineering $48M 6/1/14 10/1/14 WASD Jose F.Soto 786-268-5270 JFSOTO1 4 MIAMIDADE.005 Meter Conversions Design Build Criteria Package Miami-Dade water and Sewer Department, Victor Fernandez- Government Cut Tunnel Design-Build Criteria Package 300 Engineering $55M 4/1/08 9/1/13 WASD Cuervo,PE 786-26.8-5310 Victorfc 4miamidade.gov Capital Improvement Program-Owner'sCity of Miami Beach- JorgeCano 0MiamiBeachFL.co Representative-City of Miami Beach,FL 300 Engineenng $1 OOM 2004 2009 C I P Jorge C.Cano 786 4128660 m Doral Siormwater Master Plan Capital Improvement 300 Engineering $170K 5/1/06 4/1/07 City of Dora,Dept.of g Edward Rojas 305-593-6690 Edwaidre as:ecityofdorat.com Plan Public Works Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Impact in Trinidad 300 Engineenng 5350K 6/1/13 12/1/14 Develnteprlopment Banent Boannk(ID81 Raul Munoz 202-6231000 raulnu aiadb.org Engineenng and Geological Services for Water, Tetra Tech $7.7m 2015 On going WASD Bertha Goldenberg 786-552-8120 BMGanriamidade.gov Wastewater,and Reclaimed Water Planning Climate Change Adaptation Study on Los AngelesLos Angeles Department Aqueduct System Tetra Tech $800K 4/1/09 6/1/11 of Water and Power Delon Kwan 213-367-2166 deion.,..van4t.ADWP.COm City of HollywoodCity of Hollywood Public Water Main Replacement Program Tetra Tech $3m 2011 On going Utilities Department Clece Aurelus 954-921-3430 CAURELUS.4hollywoodit.org Water,Wastewater,&Reclaimed Water Planning Task Tetra Tech $3.94M 2015 On going WASD Bertha Goldenberg, 706-552-8(20 B.G.,,,,.... id a gov Orders 1-7 PE Assessment of flooding frequency and accelerating FIU-SLSC 5572K 10/1/14 2/1/16 University of Miami Peter K.Swart 305 421-4103 pswarNirsmas.miami.edu rates of sea level rise in Miami Beach,Florida Southeast Florida Regional Unified sea level projection for Southeast Florida FIU-SLSC $40K 10/16/14 10/15/15 Climate Change James F.Morley 305-375-5593 James.Murleygmiamldade.gav Compact The contribution of land subsidence to the increasingFlorida International F U-SLSC $180K 4/1/16 On going Rene Price 305-348-3119 pricerOu.edu coastal flooding hazard in Miami Beach University NYCDEP Assessment of Intercepting Sewers with Grade D&B $56m 2011 2012 NYCDEP Ronald Lochan 718-595-5107 rtochanadep.nyc.g)v 5 Pipe Index City of Long Beach City of Long Beach New York Avenue Pump Station D&B $2.2M 2009 2011 Department of Public Joseph Febrizio 516-431-1000 jfebriziarstongbeachny.gov Works Assets Management of NYCDEP Facilities and 58.0 $5.SM 2009 2012 NYCDEP Jason Galea 718-595-5584 jasongadep.nyc.gov Infrastructure Philadelphia Water Department General EngineenngPhiladelphia Water D&B $3.5M 2003 On going Daear'me�t Michael Lavery I 215-380-2379 michael.lavery4ohila.gov SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECTS City of Coral Gables- City of Coral Gables Stormwater Infrastructure 100 Engineering $90K 201 a Dec-16 Department of Public Jorge Acevedo 305-45006 JAcevedo2 g'caralgables.cam Verification&GIS Update-Phase I Works National Academy of Sciences Report on EvergladesNational Academy of Restoration 300 Engineering _ N/A 1/1/15 Ongoing Sciences Stephanie Johnson 202-3343385 sjohnson4nas.edu Multiple Projects as Chief of WASD's Water Transmission 300 Engineering N/A 1998 2016 WASD Albert Galambos 786-268-5501 agalaaelamidade.gov and Distribution Division Multiple Projects as Chief of WASD's AssistantAdrian Triana,MBA, 300 Engineering N/A 8/21/13 5/31/16 WASD 786-268-5409 adrian.trianasmiamidade.gov Maintenance Superintendent Pump Stations Division CGC National Science Food-Energy-Water Nexus Modeling FIU-SLSC $100K 6/1/15 5/1/17 Foundation(NSF) Bruce Hamilton 703-292511 bhamiltoansf.gov Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability ResecrchFIU SLSC $12M 10/1/15 On going National Science Antoinette 703-292-7266 anwinkleansf.gov Network Foundation(NSF] Winkterprins Monitoring for Potential Water Quality Impacts along the Eastern Boundary of Everglades National Park, F1U-SLSC $2M 7/16/09 On going FIU Edward Castaneda 305-348-1576 edward.castanedaO fiu.com Including Taylor Slough - Brookhaven National Laboratory Sanitary Utility Master NYC Energy and Utilities Plan D&B $150K 1997 !999 Edward T.Murphy 63.1-344-3466 etmurphy,Jbni. v Division /t° 15 , 1 ....,..iorr / rigilillik1/4 111116111111114111111444 1411114441\ . t t , - •-.3.- \,. / , 441141411111111 - "Ii ........, i .diafti„ tilh,lik . , 0 N' 41, lk Sit . \ 16 * , ....,..... 0 0 C 0 C) 0 0 c/I IDI-wo 2.1 Prime Proposer- Qualifications 2.2 Team - Qualifications Organizational Chart Subject Matter Experts Resumes 2.3 Financial Capacity 94(1 kit ' s .44 + 144 ////• „ 4 ,‘/", 2 . 1 .,. 'p , ..- , _... w., ,::..• . a ..:.,... ,.:,-•:;. ... -., Pro .oser Qualifications .,, Company Established in 2006 in Miami-Dade County,300 Engineering was built on the principle of delivering the highest quality of work, on time, under budget and cost-effectively, tailored to the diverse needs of our clients. With over 60 local professionals, 300 Engineering is an industry leader mid- size firm in the areas of water and wastewater engineering. Our staff have completed over 600 USEPA mandated projects with a track record of zero penalties. We understand the importance of building a relationship with our clients to ensure that our project approach aligns with their unique organizational mission and vision. This has resulted in a 98% measured project performance evaluation score, and several repeat selections for continuing contracts. Our commitment to putting clients at the center of everything has afforded us a portfolio rich in successful projects encompassing the full range of in the areas of Water, Wastewater, Water Resources and Business Solutions. Armed with over 300 years of combined local water and wastewater industry experience, our team of professionals offers a proven track record of providing exceptional services and solutions to various South Florida utility agencies. Our staff expertise includes master planning, professional engineering, and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for water supply, transmission &treatment, and wastewater conveyance &treatment systems. We strive to help our clients transform their communities and improve the quality of life. Most of our team members are well-trained and certified as Envision Sustainability Professionals (ENV SP). 300 Engineering is aligned with the City of Miami Beach's vision of positioning the community with a resilient, robust, environmentally responsible, and future proof water and wastewater system. We are committed to embarking with the City on this important endeavor and develop projects to serve in perpetuity. m """/- -1P' ' i J gd sem! �3u . i..0- , .yam i{. - -% 1,7:. , . -4 4 a Y{ e m ego a ,Iy .. 0 ,,f, ,, ,,,,,.4*:,',,, -,. ,_ _ ...„. , rt" k'h 400/ *stik..... 4414, l ... 49,/,,,v : �r�''a i " aa9wCr' 4 ,y` s r: , ,:ct:;:ig;'7':-,4"--'j,:cti,,, 17 what JkitikTi'll'ERS• • • s,, Members of. the southeast Florida Regional Climate : ip --; ,,,,,, g Compact si nificant involvement and contributions from our ..,,,r...' proposed subJ'ect matter experts *.,,,,,,„,................ .,,,, ', ,,44,'''*‘:\\\!:''si,',4i;s4',2,'',7''',,,,, • '.'"4,',;,0)!•' ,';‘, ' '4ii,,i1,41":f'''k: i .,/ Smart Engineering & Planning - i ,.. ' seasoned team of professionals with unparalleled water and wastewater : — , 2. -„, 4//I , , system knowledge to assist the Cityyready , i on developingand implementing a CIP , ..,.. . , . - , - ; , „ ,,. ,Yf :. ,,, .,. with the available information ,,, ' -1.1..„--,:,:,: . ' , A;M1/,�iy,AM�x1 f,y< ��'wfy�2� X ;,1; 1 Y. . , ., p Y ,::.,,.4, Y , '''''''''''''4,','„,,,',,:,,,,,',';.:/,;,., �yy+rrmx/�p� �y�. r'''Y H 7 fhb`, .... , 'YK,,, :, '�'�of v,t�'�#b s ,, , Proven Leadership ,. , ' ater and wastewater industryleader withyears of y '''eco nized CIP program management experience of .. . ,. • .,,, ,,,,,, 411,4 ., „„ ,, ,,, . ,„„, ,„. . „ , ..., i ' , ,.,,„, , ' - -- ''''''' .-- , . lc - k 4 x� ' , - . ., , - ----;..„ ,,, 4, , , .,-.' : . ..°4*!..,,?, A Tab 2 . 1 Pro key DIFFERENTIATORS .Reco nized Expertise in Climate Change,g Sea Level Rise, Adaptation, and Resiliency team of subject matter experts includes the FIU Sea Level Solutions Center, and other Resiliency experts Depth of Available Local Resources Local team of leaders and subject matter experts with the necessarysupport; over 50 local professionals available to attend the City's needs 24/7 �� \"`h\h jai ��e � �� • 4F 40)A,3, Water and Wastewater System COperators CIP development and implementation with operations and maintenance perspective to build an infrastructure to serve in er etu it p p y Or t* 19 State f. Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that 300 Engineering Group,P.A. FBPE .11 ., fic.-1711:1E S 11 i . , ` 14M,'1h a11VJ\Vf fK • 1111, Is authorized under the provisions of Section 471.023,Florida Statutes,to offer engineering services 0 to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. • \ . ' S 5' -, 19 CA Lic.No: I. •is..�...•..• Expiration: 2/8/..0 � i. Audit No: 228201902073 it 28326 • . �'.. q ♦ �'� 1 .rr , ................. State o • .,..... ...,, Board of Professional Engineers ▪ a. A" ' .111100111111,,a101411111111 111.0_,••••,., Attests that .• 7— w.......f— i i ""• 0.1.......•V 4 i0 Franklin Antonio Torrealba,P.E. AN.ILr.r. fir` i ,.rr, .win .,.r�.►. ••... ��.0 Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes .''-`= •-�--, S �-- A , �� 'ill •. Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lie.No: .y•�: , - �r-+�- a...... 1 Audit No: 228201916800 R 56385 a.;;..-' ....•••. ....1111.••••• p • .- .,, .. ■wi.. ..awl■ Aii 4 ).‘ v-1, ,,,' ''t t.1 mos State o .., Board of Professional Engineers , .� Attests that _ A/4 �i OSP 0.... .,:sitialiiiii il . ..114411' '41' ' , .."7"ilit. 4' * 1111. Richard Alan Coates ,P.E. ��1)) f Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes """'�'"' Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: -.•■.N..."...' 7 I k Audit No: 228201910699 R 29469 '" "'1�!► # 4.r dil ".. • • 01 t 0 ir4 1 State of Florida ... T's ,.,,,,7 1 Professional Engineers ♦ ai - MIIIILF.L.0.,.. if Board of �, ,,,,,,,,, r'0111'4 , ,� ,. ,r, 1 r, Attests that 4.•'0 L` 4 Reinaldo J. Rivera,P.E. 4 F "Otsi,t. ` �' •. . ,v,, 46 to ..,. //Lk IA I .., li f 011 ‘ir Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes ...... Ilk IP ,or Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lie.No: ,.,,�r•mow• Audit No: 228201912622 R Illb % •Millm1 drh,.10 / t I 1 P is +sww.si ...N.• or • illi Aft - ,1111,di& P id hi I 0.0111. State of Florida Nor 410..4iiioStosollOP Board of Professional Engineers OD vv-E riciiiLli Attests that 11111011111 do, RAFAEL JUAN B BALLESTEROS ,P.E. S . 0 • ......E,..> ..>..' .,.::... .. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201903176 R 20 - , w i, ,, ,, , Ta b 2 1 L.,,,,.... Pro .oser • Licenses + Certifications •„„,,,, ...44?„;111•• State of Florida • % • Department o State uti,. % , 7,10 % lb 1,01 ...atAi % I certifyfrom the records of � this office that 300 ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. �` is a corporation organized under the laws of the g State of Florida, filed on September 18, 2006. . ,„„ i 1111 fii 1111 The document number of this corporation is P06000119745. .VIIMMIIIIIIIIONIM ..... iii '"'"""` """` , , 0 e I further certify that said corporation haspaid all fees due this office , ....... �- ,,, through a 0 December 31, 2017,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report ;N. f�`' , was filed on January 11, 2017, and that its status is active. s. i 4, auwp7r. 0 I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. lt, I i i.4g Allie-' • . 0 , gimil 0 • 411% •11.1.•fir. 110 111 �/�. 111 ....z4r. ,._. 110 )111111 ........ • Given under my hand and the 1 ill 4. 0 "' ,',,,,st'' Great Seal of the State of Florida jo►0 ,,,.. .....` " at Tallahassee,the Capital,this 0 the Eleventh ,� day of January,2017 ir •,IP ." 4111 , .,,,,LE-----. ... 0*...i.--....;-/-,---- -- 14,-... • 0 --- .,Q ,IP de, ..40 Nhie re ' r i--- -------' ./E...-1./;. ,.:::,, ,„ -_;;,,,---_----.,-.t--...1,, a wia OP ' . : , ,.--,,,.,..,...A_,....,,, , ' ,, ,,,,,.„., , 1. 1..71,, •7 _,, z 16f1A% 04A. N. dr * , ip dP . b ,1.;,, ,....,,W : '.‘ -‘i_I lip Secretaly of State $ lip '...-.4i; ;„„4,,,:- .-- -. Trackingi. 4110 410 , IP dIP Number:CC04 7 � 837260 4.41P ih3i5 ii To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then . ' follow the instructions displayed. Am,0 ' htt s://services.sunbiz.org/Filing p � bsfCertiticateOfiStatus/CerhficateAuthenhcahon V 21 Tetra Tech - Founded in 1966, Tetra Tech is a full service engineering consulting firm that offers proven experience and demonstrated excellence in professional engineering services in the water, wastewater and reclaimed er,/ water utilities. Our focus includes all aspects of comprehensive infrastructure systems, including transmission and distribution systems; treatment plants; collection, and supporting infrastructure. It is our core belief that our professionals and staff serve as an extension of our client's staff.With over 16,000 employees and annual revenues of $2.5 billion per year we have the finances and resources to respond efficiently and effectively to almost any discipline of project, including emergency response after disaster scenarios. Our award winning team has been recognized for innovation and dedication over the years, and we strive to bring that perspective to each new project. Engineering News-Record (ENR) has ranked Tetra Tech No. 1 in Water for 13 consecutive years, as well as No. 7 for Top 500 Engineering Firms and No. 2 in the nation for Pipelines. Tetra Tech has built a reputation in the industry as a leader in developing effective solutions to constantly changing, tough engineering challenges with creative, yet consistently effective solutions. Our reputation for providing reliable engineering solutions is backed by reliable systems, engineering, scientific, economic, and business analyses. Our presence and repeat selection for continuing contracts throughout Florida exemplifies our commitment and client satisfaction. We have planned, designed, permitted, and overseen construction of numerous projects in Florida, through our numerous continuing contracts. We have provided full service general engineering services for many south Florida municipalities under continuing services contracts, including the below list of clients. Tetra Tech is serving as continuing consultant to over 50 governmental agencies in Florida. /17,;(?"1 - 0 ey, \)•-\\ N,., 0 . NA F w '\11 2°D C tN.* \\ 7,, ///''', 7, ' d' I ' 4, 47„1"'"'""" ' ,,, '''' ' , N Some in South Florida include: A _ '//// /��; y , ,n, ., .fir'"" F' • Village of KeyBiscayne (12 years) ` , Jam'' ......ma---'" . j'jj'/�', • Cityof North Miami Beach (10 years) '/'' ' -/91� , • City of North Miami (5 years) %" '''''�/ "1'','/,',4,,,,,, • City of Hollywood (13 years) • City of Tamarac (12 years) ``'' • City of Miramar (10 years) • City of Fort Lauderdale (4 years) • City of Hallandale (4 years) / • City of Pompano Beach (1 year) 4k ,,,,�°'4//' ti4v i %�, / 22 Ta b 2 • 1 ' ro .oserQualifications • LicensesCertifications+ ,... '4 State.' , ori a q Board 9 .Pro': tonal Engineers a 3,."2 sts that l A,Op �t:,..,;:reel"; lie 1 iEBPE K .•_M y r 1 tikl.t trttiwat f 7= engineering authorized under the provisitims�of 5actio�, .' -f ,; C� atya�s,to offer services to the public through a Professional Angilleer,duty I,:.2: •4.,.-:Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration: 2/28/2019 ",,.�` "`"-- ' , '-�''_. ' '' CA Lic.No: S.>w r♦ Audit No: 228201902800 R ' ____, 2429 aeoFlorida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Kenneth L. Caban,P.E. \ FBPF ' „ , , Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201914137 R 59276 a eFlorida s Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Diana M. Santander,P.E. 40,#\I— BPE _.. _ Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.E.Lic.No: Audit No: 228201914304 R 65854 Tetra Tech c , ,, ,. Ft; :, , Rankings 1 Water ;,'y ' State o . Environmental Management Board of Professional Engineers 1 Solid Waste poi- Attests that I. Dams&Reservoirs Christopher Adam Zavatsky,P.E. A FBPE ._ 1 Treatment/Desalination 1 Wind Power Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes ,; ., P.E.Lic.No: 7 Top 500 Design Firms Expiration:2/28/2019 . Audit No: 228201901650 R 76885 14! 23 t ,,,ic ,•;;:�•,\\\'\\\ f\, \, ,• ;: ,.•,:a,;,L�\,a.,\-�;Mf:•t�`7:\•R+qM �\,',N.,,,,,,:,;,,,„;,:,,,,,4,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,',,,,,,\ 1 Vtn::. C1 �1 \ �;•,. ,_ ,,>,.,c:.,.,•,,.„ ... :. \� ,,. ,.,,\° .,,,., y\��\f\1��:.1x..1\y�• •�a•N@.�\��'�.ti)�k tT ��a\„�� ,\� ,�i�, +.�..,t'\ \,\ ,•. .'v:: J•' -,.: �wa< ` \�,4d.�;N`J.,x\\v\\�,•d';`\�r\\na\',1\ a ,\�1?'1A`J,,,�,... ,. �.;,,1n�hiZ`� s1\,,+y.., •.,....,;.. \NZ �t \� \'d��•�J��aC��?\M 1„ h11` ,F. •,, .. ;. \\\�,1d��\\w,`,�a� y > \," „, d 1 h,,I,,\\_,, b�h.'r` t.,,*;1��'\Cr+ v•,� a a 5`,+\.,\,,,,C1-,kr �� -,\\�\h•: \1J d`,s a\r*,dR\\\�1 \,\`\, .,Vj \y `1 1a' • ,:;, x,,w .,,,;•.. -;. •.. `;'. • •, ,r,.;• `,,, .• „r�d�,', \\r�., \� \M s ..8z .�;.,,-4,-,,,;:',,,,, ,,,,,,P ,,a1\�\\\�,\ � ...\; -•:•�. „,,,,,,,,4\N, if ... a... \,,. ... ..:. 1\:.,. �. .. V. ,., ,, , , ,,:.�. .. \. .*):_ x � \�, ,, ;,.,.1\ 1 ,x .\ v.., ,•;, S,: , D&B Engineers and Architects - D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) is comprised of a broad- based, multi-disciplined team of environmental, sanitary, civil, structural, electrical, mechanical and chemical engineers; environmental scientists; ecologists and biologists; geologists and hydrogeologists;quality assurance/quality control specialists who are committed to the very highest professional standards with expertise in many facets of environmental engineering, as well as client satisfaction.Since 1965,the firm has planned,designed,and performed construction management on thousands of public works projects. D&B has been providing successful design services on major projects for over five decades to professional clients similar to the City of Miami Beach (City). D&B is a leader in the field of wastewater management and provides the full spectrum of engineering and support services, including water main improvements, master plans, construction management services, design engineering services during construction, development of sewer use ordinances, delineation of sewer districts, planning and design; feasibility studies; project development; preparation of plans and specifications; preparation of O&M manuals; training of operating personnel; and supervision of operation. The firm is staffed to handle all types of environmental/wastewater related projects: D&B is a leading firm in the professional world of Environmental Engineering and will be an asset to the project. D&B consistently receives high rankings at the national and regional level from the following major engineering publications: Engineering News-Record (ENR) "Top 200 Environmental Design Firms” Engineering News-Record (ENR) "Top 500 Design Firms" Engineering News-Record (ENR) New York"Top 100 Design Firms" ',�RNY� s N 4 4-- `' S �,ir/li / 2()Iti' t N i t I 1 2()1(i ^` box' � 'l„�,„,•..�.....+++„+... ENR'''', . 1:'/"/"14117 . i�# �'f y :•r 4 i. .N!rx, ' 49f ,-- ,A8 1;:1R* , .�iSI G ', 2�t ►TOP R TOP TOP TQP F R,.1 �goo100' - f�� _______. ENVIRONMENTAL 'NEW YORK .., I �' , DESIGN F FIRMS ,� _. , 2015 ENR,New York 2015 ENR 2016 ENR 2016 ENR,New York 2016 ENR Top 100 Design Firm Top 500 Design Firm Top 200 Environmental Top 100 Design Firm Top 500 Design Firm Design Firm 24 T b a 2 . I • • Pro .osr Qualificattons ... .....:... . .. ,.„.„ „ w.. M + Certifications Licenses S tate o ort a tate ofFlorida Board of Professional Engineers State Attests that De artment o Steven A.Fangmann,P.E. E p Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2019 P.S.Lic.No: I certify from the records of this office that D&B ENGINEERS AND Audit No: 2-8201911594 R ARCHITECTS,P.C.is a New York corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,qualified on August 18,1999. The document number of this corporation is F99000004264. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through °"ai""ties"°"Gera...Rater, ...Rater,ir'dorSe-Sanaa Pct. December 31,2016,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 25.2016,and that its status is active. Miami-Dade County Internal Services Department Architecture//Engineering(A/E) Pre-Qualification Certificate I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. 0.11 ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS.P.C. This certificate is hereby issued to: 262S Ponce de Leon Blvd..Suite 300,Coral Gables.Ft 3313. Approval Date.07/06/2016 Expiration Dater 07/31/2017 The above name applicant is pre-qualified to provide professional A/E services for Miami-Dade County for the period indicated above.The applicant has committed its firm to comply with the specific conditions listed below L Pre-Qualified to offer professional services only in the Miami-Dade County technic.categories shown,n the'Statement of Technical Qualifications.'All technical Given under my hand and the category restrictions must be stncty adhered to. Great Seal of the State of Florida 2 Pre-Qualification Certification(PQC)consolidates the atichNcal certification,affirmative action part,and vendor registration into Dere streamlined certification process resulting in the issuance of a Pre-Qualification Certificate at Tallahassee,the Capital,this 3.Report any significant changes,such as contact person,qualifier,ownership,firm address,etc.by login on the Self-Service Portal at www.miamidade gov/vendor the Sixteenth day of June,2016 within 30 days of such a change.Failure to report said charges to die County may result in the immediate suspension or termination of your firm,Pre-Qualification Certification. �� T 4.Failure to renew your firm's PQ0 at least thirty(30)days prior to your firm's current expiratioe date may result in the suspension and/or termination from County programs and current or future contracts until your firm's Pre-QIWiicabon Certification has been proper*renewed_Any lapses in the certification of any of the r '•, required PQC areas(vendor registration,affirmative action plan,or technical certification,will result in a lapse in your PQC.Finns are responsible for observing and adhering to all submission deadlines. fM r x > 5.My renewal applications and/or supporting documents submitted after the appkation deadline right delay the review of your fan's PQC certification to the next available Technics)Certification Committee meeting.The PQC application,submission deadlines,and the Techntnt Certification Comrrvttee meeting aabe lendar n ;4' r —4found on Procurement Management web site loc...blip;//www.miamidade.gov/entemalser i.s/prequailification-cee ification asci • 6.Permit Miami-Dade County representatives to have access dun.normal business hours m audit booi6 and records to verify information submitted with this application.This right of access shall commerce on Me approval date of this certificate and semi'termini on its expiration date. ;,,:, =-�, Secretary of State •,� T Please note that if at any time Miami-Dade County's has reason to believe that arty person or firm has willfully and knowingly provided incorrect information or made false statements,the County may refer the matter to the State Attorney's Office and/or other investigative agencies,initiate debarment procedures,and/or pursue sanctions or other legal remedies in accordance with Miami-Dade County pdfcy and/or applicable federal,state and local taws. Tracking Number:CU68311529359 -Co authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then App dun Technical Cemticabon Committee follow the instructions displayed. Miami-Dade County https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertificateAuthentication 25 m. ,.,1.,....,.:/... .i rr..... . :::.....x,. N'...,. .,,....,r.r.,: :.r,..l.r.i/I .::....,. r..i.::,I r:.., 0/./.:.r..,./.. i :,/...... .//r ✓.:, ,...,../.., ,Y „lir /.,:.,..,....1..,. .,. .//, /, Florida International University SLSC - The Sea Level Solutions Center (SLSC) was launched in July 2015 to bring together diverse faculty expertise across Florida International University (FIU) to address all issues surrounding the exceptional challenges for the natural-built environment and society posed by rising seas.The SLSC was founded on 3 central tenets: (1) only the best available research and analyses can drive effective adaptation to preserve governance systems, infrastructure, business, supply chains, ecosystem dependencies, and personal assets, (2) synthesis and communication of existing knowledge and expertise is crucial to provide accurate predictions and risk assessments of sea level rise (SLR), and (3) the current and future student body that FIU serves is the next generation of scientists, architects, planners, engineers,journalists, lawyers, policy makers and entrepreneurs charged with developing the sustainable solutions to this and other climate change impacts. Addressing challenges and solutions associated with sea level changes requires a broad intellectual approach that encompasses multiple disciplines. The SLSC was established to fill the significant need for an organizational mechanism to advance the science of sea level change, to develop useful and sustained sea level responses in the natural-built environment, communicate the impacts and engage in solutions, and train the next generation of leaders. The SLSC focuses on leveraging existing research expertise across diverse disciplines (e.g., the natural and social sciences, architecture, engineering, computing, law, communications, business, human health and tourism management), is built on a demonstrated history of success working with both government and the private sector, and has strongly poised itself to make an enduring contribution to the well-being of a prosperous Miami-Dade County (MDC) and the South Florida community. Mission Statement The Sea Level Solutions Center applies information to build knowledge, design and evaluate mitigation and adaptation strategies, and create resilient, prosperous coastal urban communities Vision The vision of the Sea Level Solutions Center (SLSC) is: • To realize innovative, equitable solutions for social, environmental and economic prosperity and engage communities to become resilient to the impacts associated with sea-level rise and climate change • To forge interdisciplinary teams to develop cross-cutting decision support and guide solutions to the impacts of sea level rise and actions that benefit society locally, regionally and internationally • To play an integral role in guiding and adapting the South Florida community to be economically-viable, equitable, healthy and sustainable Values Sustainability, resilience, innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, equity, social and environmental justice Expanded Statement The Sea Level Solutions Center(SLSC) advances its mission through multidisciplinary, university-wide collaborations and partnerships with academic institutions in the Florida Climate Institute, with counties and municipalities through the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact, and with management agencies, businesses and industrial partners. The SLSC develops mechanisms that facilitate education and communication of climate change science, by creating government and industry frameworks for timely responses, conducting research to establish a sound basis for adaptation and resource management plans, informing adaptation decisions and actions, and evaluating the implementation of long-term mitigation strategies. We achieve our mission through interdisciplinary work streams with focused coastal urban resilience program of work and outcomes (SLSC Comprehensive Program of Work) in the public and private sector areas of (1) economy, (2) natural environment, (3) community, and (4) built environment (SLSC work streams). The formulaic approach follows a SLSC Operational Model that integrates environment, social and infrastructure data to create knowledge that advances sea level solutions in collaborations across FIU units and with external partners. 26 r__--------...-m------------. Ta . Pro •oser Qualifications Mit& 41/ik Licenses + Certifications 4r%01snS scf#tisja t.3,‘• iktd.t. teuog _n, i*, 49 9 stt+-4' Os' 4) li> 0 0\ .`0,(9 ,C4 42., lea drifte 0 S: , ,,, ii": it' et 0 e to = 0 z s 03 43 4 .... SEA LEVEL 0 7. SOLUTIONS ... E uy , c et, c 0 CENTER 0 ,c. 8 c 0 --• 4, .0, 1 4 ':, 10 to* 143t°12‘ 4, 4fiti 4> 0 , , et; -- ----., : 4r0. ing AeCt Wake \ 1! 27 300ENGI-01 LAWRENCE AC-ORE) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 4/11/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). CONTACT PRODUCER NAME: Acrisure,LLC d/b/a InSource PHONE ,;°No,Ext):(305)670-6111 (A ,No►:(305)670-9699 9500 South Dadeland Boulevard E-MAIL 4th Floor ADDRESS:Idiaz@insource-inc.com Miami,FL 33156-2867 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Sentinel Ins.Co.Ltd. 11000 INSURED INSURER B:Arch Insurance Company 10348 300 Engineering Group PA INSURER C: 3850 Bird Road,Suite 601 INSURER D: Miami,FL 33146 INSURER E INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. /NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUER POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR /NSD WVD (MM/DD/YYYY1 (MM/DD/YYYY)' A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR X X 21 SBABX6375 06/23/2016 06/23/2017 DAMAGE TO RENTED 1,000,000 PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY PECO-- LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER: $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1,000,000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Ea accident) ANY AUTO X X 21SBABX6375 06/23/2016 06/23/2017 BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ X HIRED X NON-OWNED PeOr PERdaccientDAMAGE AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY ) UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY I STATUTE 12-r - AND ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ _ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N I A (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE$ If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below I E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ B Architects/Engineers X PAAEP0015100 07/16/2016 07/16/2017!per claim 1,000,000 B Architects/Engineers X ,PAAEP0015100 07/16/2016 07/16/2017 iAggregate 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS I VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) Professional Liability-Claims Made Policy with$15,000 per claim/$45,000 Aggregate deductible. Retroactive Date: 7/16/13 Proposal RFQ2017-129-KB-Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection(CEI)Firms To Provide Various CEI Services On An"As Needed"Basis CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Miami Beach ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue 3rd Floor AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Miami Beach,FL 33139 e.k.1 ACORD 25(2016/03) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 28 ,sy , 9,s,r „,„,,, / Ta b 2 • 1 Pro .oser ua i ica ions Insurance ACORN® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) �� 04/11/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT:If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: AP INTEGO INSURANCE GROUP LLC PHONE (A/C,No,Ext):(866)890-9965 I FAX (A/C,No): (888)733-5112 375 WOODCLIFF DR 1ST FL E-MAIL FAIRPORT,NY 14450 ADDRESS:travelersselectpayrollservices@travelers.com (866)890-9965 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC S INSURER A:THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA INSURED INSURER B: 300 ENGINEERING GROUP PA 3850 BIRD ROAD SUITE 601 INSURER C: CORAL GABLES,FL 33146 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 801389355301101 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POUCY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY DAMAGE TO RENTED (CLAIMS-MADE I I OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP(Any one person) $ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ POLICY I I JECOT I I LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ OTHER: $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ $ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ I DED I I RETENTION$ $ WNORKERS COMPENSATION N/A UB-7G818334-17 01/19/2017 01/19/2018 X STATUTE I OTH- ERH A AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE❑ E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if more space is required) RE:RSQ 2017-129-KB CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 1755 MERIDIAN AVENUE,3RD FLOOR ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. MIAMI BEACH,FL 33139 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • A,„,,ft.„).A..-7....., I ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Iii! 29 y Occ N o 0 cn co .N n N Q7T3 .2 p 43 v.) U N 0 ) 0 0 O 3 g O Q c Q1 5 2 0) PROJECTS o E ° a '� 2 45 U U 0 o c o 3 0 E D 0 13; 0 0 C fi < 2 cm o o- 5 -2*.t5 .-. c' r 0 c 0 6 0 Q 0 a P o y U 0 p 0' 3 3 3 3 3 3 r U2 U 3 E > y $ y f i $215M PumpStation Improvement Program(PSIP) M CS IS CS Ei C2 CS C2 IS P 9 III O $2.4B Program and Construction Management for USEPA Consent Decree Projects el nel 19ff,1 ea (PMCM) Basis of Design Report(BODR)Services for Water and Sewer Service to un-sewered el ea ,s. Commercial and Industrial Areas PortMiami Water Transmission and Distribution Systems Master Plan imilimilli n oil ea • Rehabilitation/Replacement of 2.5 Miles of 48-Inch PCCP FM Avenue Basis of Design , tn , Report(BODR) ts i Wastewater Transmission System Hydraulic Computer Model-Wastewater Gravity ilimi m i el Sewer Modeling ' ",' Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Computer Model gen naininn eam WASD's Installation of 16-Inch Water Main Along NW 36th Street from Curtis Parkway n i to NW 42nd Ave North of Miami International Airport Small Water Mains Replacement Program(SWMRP),Phases I and Phase II Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department$17M Comprehensive Lateral IlnillIllnllrnllnll Investigation Program(CLIP) iiiimim City of Coral Gables Wastewater Infrastructure Geographic Information System(GIS) irm , Updates 7. GIS Utility Backlog Projects/Miami-Dade County 4,I; 1,00,P, ye, South Miami Heights Water Main Replacement and Meter Conversions Design Build e? Criteria Package Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department,Government Cut Tunnel Design-Build tn Gill x Criteria Package n immi i Capital Improvement Program-Owner's Representative-City of Miami Beach,FL ; ; 1 1 Doral Stormwater Master Plan Capital Improvement Plan/Doral,FL IMINIIIIIIII (9 Mal Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Impacts in Trinidad ei l 3 0 , Tab 2 1 . , ,, , , , . Pro .oser Qualifications • Our wand wCIPexpeence oa ii tg 6 c a ° o D +(P. > c Q ; 0 3 o a c m _12o c PROJECTS .2 U a ° .? c Q o a) 5 a oc o a) 2 a� 2 Q 6 2 U.o a c °" o D C3 Z3 U C o Q C 0) c n 3 2 3 © 3 5 .a 4 ce o c u� a) ? L Q? 6 c Q 2'o a) = Uc,. U -6: > it a 11111111111111111/1211111111111111.111111111111111111111111111 Engineering and Geological Services for Water,Wastewater,and Reclaimed Water 11: rn [gm Planning II Ell Climate Change Adaptation Study on Los Angeles Aqueduct System 11111.11111111 n ., City of Hollywood Water Main Replacement Program 13111111111611111111111111111 Water,Wastewater,&Reclaimed Water Planning:Task Orders 1-7 MO n u 3 ME fn 111E1E1111 Assessment of flooding frequency and accelerating rates of sea level rise in Miami Beach,Florida The contribution of land subsidence to the increasing coastal flooding hazard in Miami Beach 1111111111111131111. NYCDEP Assessment of Intercepting Sewers with Grade 5 Pipe Index City of Long Beach New York Avenue Pump Station 111111111 n 111 � W III n 111.1111 Assets Management of NYCDEP Facilities and Infrastructure Philadelphia Water Department General Engineering Services CIO n . El ei IIIIIIIIII E2 1111 ,,,,- , ,,,,,- Supplemental Projects City of Coral Gables Stormwater Infrastructure Verification&GIS Update-Phase 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Multiple Projects as Chief of WASD's Water Transmission and Distribution Division Multiple Projects as Chief of WASD's Assistant Maintenance Superintendent Pump Stations Division I National Academy of Sciences Report on Everglades Restoration N Food-Energy-Water Nexus Modeling 11111111111111111. Itt 1.11.1111111 Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII tn 11111 Monitoring for Potential Water Quality Impacts along the Eastern Boundary of 111111 Everglades National Park,Including Taylor Slough IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII "" Brookhaven National LaboratorySanitary ,'°,:.Utility Master Plan ' 31 l l S215M PumpImprovement (PSIP) , ,, , . , .. . � f „� .. - .,,..1, ,,,,,,,,,,,4„,,,,,.,1 ,,,,,,,,,,s,,. • '.. ',yy . • : : ' • •:,,, .r, - : '-.`•' 3♦ ..- ,,,,,,% , wi ' ; t ,`�•,♦wfi . xr , +J'• + ♦ , t .,, . ' i' z ♦ `; `•,y y ` '.dr, x. + trtFfy `fa. yiy ,:',4,,'0; Vi�ltv• 4n, µS: ' �1 ''It IL._______L •t� T uJ x t0177 ?,,A, 's; ,.„2,'4 hs * ,, * ---1-7 ) ,. *,: ' -:":42-7,_:Iii,? l ,� '► 1 A11411„,, �,;- arty 'p.-r.t�,.�[y' '�7ti `°y� 0�t:', r r f _ �7. �.r,.,...._.. . .f 1_b^. ., . i •.r, _,,, __---,I., , . . ' i '. , „, ., ,, . 9.1 titt-..ty,;;--;:g.-k--,-- ...0-17,*,--4. ' 'ir- „ ,... .. iliott, • '1111116 - ., ,. .. 411.,..... _- , , ,,,„ . , ,,;-...--,- - .. Key Similarities Start Date: 01/2014 Completed: On-going Cost: $215M (Construction) $17M (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role:Program management services including design management, construction management, infiltration/inflow management, cost Systems estimates, inspection, pump station analysis, scheduling, document • Wastewater Pump/Lift control, PCTS health and safety services, permitting, development Stations coordination, value engineering, invoice processing, hydraulic modeling • W i tri tion Desi n coordination, compliance reporting, public outreach, presentation to ester D s bu g local officials, among others. • Wastewater Collection Contact Information: Rolando Roque, PE Design Reference Telephone Number: 786-552-8129 H draulic ModelingE-mail: ROQUER©miamidade.gov • y • Corrosion Control and j Proect Descption: Remed�at�on � • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ The Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) established a Program and Construction Management for the implementation of a Resiliency Pump Station Improvement Program (PSIP) for upgrading the Wastewater • Water and Wastewater Collection and Transmission System (WCTS) which involves the review and evaluation of over 113 sewage pump stations of all sizes, basis of design Master Planning reports, plans,and operations of pump stations and force mains for WASD. • Value Engineering Na The program includes the validation team including prioritization of sewer • Water and Wastewater system evaluation survey (SSES, Infiltration/Inflow), supervisory control and data acquisition, pump station, force main, and facilities planning and System Expansion implementation activities. WASD's pump stations must to be certified as • Construction capable of meeting a nominal average pump operating time (NAPOT) Management of less than or equal to 10 hours per day and capable of meeting peak flows and peak pressures. Pump stations in moratorium do not allow new • Engineering Studies developments to connect to the sewer system until the Remedial Action • Cost Estimating / Plan is implemented and completed. Scheduling 300 Engineering is the Program Manager, responsible for the following four phases of the program: 1) Planning and Engineering which includes the basis of design report development for pump station and force main projects; 2) Design Management of 8 Design Consultants including 30, AI 60, 90 and 100% plan and design reviews to ensure compliance with the ENG t N EER t NG GROUP, P.A. different permitting agencies; 3) Construction Management of multiple 32 ___ Ta b 2 . 1 v.,__,.,, ,, , , , ,, , ,,,,,.- , , Pro Pro .oser . ,,,,,,„ ... ,, Similar Experience pump station and force main contractors through the County's MCC 7040 procurement method;and,4)Infiltration and Inflow Management which entails the management of 4 different contractors for Manhole, Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), CIPP, and Dig and Replace (D&R) contracts. Through this contract,300 Engineering is providing program management services including design management, construction management, infiltration/inflow management, cost estimates, inspection, pump station analysis, scheduling, document control, PCTS health and safety services, permitting, development coordination, value engineering, invoice processing, hydraulic modeling coordination, compliance reporting, public outreach, presentation to local officials, among others. This Program includes the rehabilitation of 113 sewage pump station ? '°" �" ' ° '-"*"- pump Sial.,.0 basins in the county which entails over 130 pump station and force 1 h�C main projects, plus an Infiltration and Inflow reduction program for over 50 basins. w Pump Station Projects Pump Station Projects involve out-of-compliance local lift stations ranging from 5 to over 300 horse power pumps (rated capacity). In ':M I order to provide the most cost-effective approach to WASD while ,a rehabbingthese pumpstations, our Engineering Team uses the «� 11,Ak 1 1 g g ,; ;,u following approach: If it i;n# t.. is t! *. ..s,. ,.1 11' 1. Operations and Maintenance work (least expensive). - ;,' - _.. 2. Increase force main discharge capacity b replacing the existing fit`7- '',.: ,,„ w g p Y Y p g g � � � installing a parallel line. :a.. s, 3. Rehabilitation of existing pump station. ` lit - 4 4. New pump station (most expensive). ',: ° 't74e -1 Y A In the Planning, Engineering and Design of pump stations, our ,, ', , i w , engineering team considers sea level rise projections through the planning tools developed and recommended by the SE Florida ,,,_ k, r, Climate Change Compact, including: Unified Sea Level Rise ,A „„ ° , Projection for Southeast Florida, Region-wide and County-wide Sea - Level Rise Inundation Vulnerability Assessments and USACE Sea Level ' Change Curve Calculator. { Force Main Projects " au, � wA9µ ,,,, a � Force Main Projects involve undersized lines that once replaced, relieve pressures at one or multiple pump stations in the system t s stem betterment projects). These force main projects range from( Y p J ) g �° 10., 8 up to 24-inch diameter size. `6 ., . a a,n, A Relevant Highlights • Program and Construction Management of$215M in upgrades to the WCTS System. • The program aims to bring into compliance 113 Sewage Pump Station according to the • 10-hour NAPOT Criteria and Peak Flow Criterion to meet USEPA and FDEP Requirements. • Thorough knowledge of WASD's sewer system. • Close Coordination with WASD- Extension of WASD's staff. 141 33 .,,r.,,..r:..... and ..: ...., .:. .:....,. , ' r / ! (rr n w rnI � / /r!///,/�M// - -";;,77;,,,.„:;,„,..,„/ yrmr � Nj� y ''''''',,,t;,,, ta � .r //. ,„JrIt f®4 #'''''''''l br / <k %C .,�/ // . r, % 4 :[/�li//k xino.4 «2S' w[•'vAryfY 5i/��r//,(/r 1r.ri/a � ,/ .7.4,444/./,'”,/ /"7/1z /xz: � ..�� / , ",+.1„,#,,,,,,,, . :: . / t� u f . : .x ;:4 , ,M� an�P [, ,40/49a#40,441;4 �yJ,F—kSFtYMXrmw P q, iro / * ay ;,,01141,,,o,,,,,rwdyy b; />, r/i//N/.,"l//l//,, / m , a / r k #,,,,,,,/,„ ,„//y,N9. / [///7#//,/IY,4/grHr %4/, Program Mana ement Ror G# . r� to the Wastewater System Po rojects ,„ ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ...,, , „ , 0, „ , ,,,„ *. ., i„,.. ,. , , . 4 , 1 . , . i* I li ” �� y iv ... ,,,,t,,,,ii, , , i t I' U 9 °1A ...,.. a ^8tr Fr i d Y at 1T k I �rPr 8x 'r,, ]Ol ti, 4y A r'a'[ a'yw+ y ' ,S Mx"4141,, iH H a u §f.„..f S Key Similarities Start Date: 06/2014 Completed: N/A Cost: $2.4B (Construction), $91 M (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Program Management, Construction Management, Hydraulic Modeling, Scheduling, Cost Estimates, Engineering Studies, Public Systems Outreach, Development Coordination, Engineering Analysis, Inspection • Wastewater Pump/Lift and Document Control Stations Contact Information: Dan Edwards, PE • W t r Distribution Desi n Reference Telephone Number: 786-232-5257 a e g Email: DJEDWOl@miamidade.gov • Wastewater Collection Design Modeling Description: • M Hydraulic ode g The PMCM Team was selected as Owner's Representative by the • Corrosion Control and Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) to provide Program Remediation and Construction Management Services Related to the Wastewater CC SLR Ada tatian System Priority Projects, including WASD's third Consent Decree with the • / / p / United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Florida Resiliency Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). • Water and Wastewater Our team is responsible for the management of three (3) major design Master Plannin consultants divided into the following programs: g • Consent Decree Capacity Management, Operation, and • Value Engineering Maintenance Programs • Water and Wastewater • Design Services for Wastewater Treatment Plants Related to Consent System Expansion nsion Decree Projects y p • Design Services for Wastewater Collection and Transmission Systems • Construction Related to Consent Decree Projects Management En ineerin Studies 300 Engineering Group,P.A(300 Engineering) is working for the Wastewater • g g Collection and Transmission System (WCTS). 300 Engineering is assisting the • Cost Estimating / department with the coordination and management of over ninety-three Scheduling (93) Force Main and Pump Station Projects from conception to closure, including the following phases: • Engineering Design • Permitting • Procurement a • Construction ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. • Project Certification IP Force Main Projects 34 Tab 2 . 1 * , --. ,y Pro •oxer Qualifications Similar Experience The following Force Main projects are included in the Consent Decree and are part of the WCTS Task: • Government Cut Project Phase 3 - Replacement of Existing 54-Inch Force Main From Fisher Island and to CDWWTP • Design/Build North Dade 72-Inch Force Main Along NW 159th St Between NW 17th Ave And NE 10th Ave • Installation of 32,172 LF Of 54-Inch FM in SW 232nd St from 127th Ave To SDWWTP and in SW 127th Ave from 232nd St to 280th St • Rehabilitation of 54-Inch PCCP Force Main from NW 2nd St & 67th Ave to NW 11th St & 37th Ave. The PMCM Team will develop a BODR. • Rehabilitation/Replacement of 13,300 LF OF 48-Inch Force Main in NW 156th St from 57th Ave to 32nd Ave. The PMCM Team will develop a BODR. In addition to these large-size Force Main Projects,the replacement of approximately 30 miles of Asbestos Cement (AC) FM are being completed under the supervision of our team and WASD. The validation of these FM Projects was also performed, which included the Hydraulic Modeling Analysis of the existing and proposed conditions. Pump Station Projects Pump Station Projects range from local lift stations to regional and booster stations. local pump station must be certified as capable of meeting a nominal average pump operating time (NAPOT) of less than or equal to ten (10) hours per day. Also, our Team is evaluating the operating conditions of Regional and local Booster Stations that require upgrades such as: electrical, wet well maintenance, pump station relocation, pumps replacements,etc.These large stations are required to be operating in optimum conditions to meet Ocean Outfall Legislation requirements. The WCTS Team led by 300 Engineering, is responsible for the Planning and Engineering (BODR and/or -- -- Technical Memorandum), and Design of the following Regional -4 and Booster Pump Stations: PS 0418, PS 0691, PS 0692, PS 0414, -F-- / -- PS 0415, PS 0416, PS 0417, PS 0301, and PS 0187. In the Planning, 1 ,11 Engineering and Design of the General and Booster Pump Stations s , our team considers sea level rise projections through the planning � , ' = � � ._ tools developed and recommended by the SE Florida Climate - . 7 ;A Change Compact, including: Unified Sea Level Rise Projection -- for Southeast Florida Region-wide and County-wide Sea Level Rise Inundation Vulnerability Assessments and USACE Sea Level w - - Euro t'•.xra•nr.ti, -'y:y+,�'- �.„_/L�-'.".�..,„ �:.p e Change Curve Calculator. k d'Ftl `;rwk r""�,- -1,! ,,,y .,.. f Hydraulic Modeling � . . �..� .�, � �.oF,.y�_r ,. ,.�, �. ., _..�., w..:� r4'axN.i'tu.rose�`.ec�,,n Mwa MM7 A<w•r►Y:s.mrgdn.•ya a;-'3 r ZMa i,a}r,a i.?ra Our team is hydraulically validating each CD and FM Project using Infoworks as required by WASD.The hydraulic modeling includes the upgrades related to the 2025 Ocean Outfall Legislation to provide an inclusive approach to consider both short and long term improvements. The following tasks were performed under: • Verification of Wet Weather Conditions in the WCTS Hydraulic Model • Verification of the Dry Weather Conditions in the WCTS Hydraulic Model • Development of the Base Line Model • Addition of the Ocean Outfall Legislation and other WASD Programs and Projects Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects The Consent Decree requires Miami-Dade County to improve their three (3) Wastewater Treatment Plants, North District, Central District and South District WWTPs. These plants combined average flow is approximately 300 Million Gallons per day (MGD).The PMCM team is managing over 52 Projects within these to increase the WWTPs hydraulic capacity. 1! 35 I/„ /, Basis of DReport (BODR) Services for Water &Sewer Service to un-sewered Commercial and Ito, fr Via';, S i /,,,,„ , 9p n' I/I ,,,,,%ld fyl I/ill;y /%,I,;P ::'< X y y .!,' :,n n^i' „ r"''n vI'fir,I✓ "•i 4 / /�yw y. � "a. ad yew roa.:, ' «, ; ; yr Y y 2 4 > � 'Y'::: ✓.... r . ..::..�'' q; I.:, ":-L„,r ::4.�' ::;:::p `% / !..4 Np ,pi'." ,� `� ^�+s,: r.. .. w< yyam�P,. d ra 0 H ,7w ix <a. , i ' ;��i l N '�F'N ,. �1if .�;. rw4. so, .,,_y 'n: •f,. ^'M :`. ,; % w. ;1 .,..^w,. .w.+.`•.x.' «ink , adm -- PA. ::.... Y � .;,.; Y , : ',.y,,... �}iM'«4H1-r-.x� x.♦ 'r'v. ^01 � •:a`bq *IP.' ,w 0../,.._ '',ii.- f. .: "�� , jilt.5b -:,_1:;.1,44,, YR ��k �MNMMY,I,� .'.w '4"*i kn b,. ...: y: i d .3, t a•a: -- /4,,,,:M• '',.�Yp : � AW�I�y''MR'.1)Ye'4' :: f xn'MMI '. �F �S P � - r.�,Y '�` '" d�"':.�.. ': ..,,./V"k tY�'..i, .., «.m'mwnw.+„.vn.�Cu P.;ww .:::.... II:: '^�. 4 -:it :h •..,;MYMF,:w. "....:z 'h, ' E.w.ur,,.w.:_..........ai , : ;,.;.' 1 rr•<,� .,„--.....-.47";•:." . r' .�c' zw. Nµw Awww,:" i', fi�rr. „R.a.o b” a M '� ftP :Pa`. ,„� ,�.'.mwMi ., t .le.PM�x- �'�'.ro.. �„"- .., a a i 4� "�. �'�', � �a ,. . 'arAi1k1W t m,:,: - wiMmmaw„wm.e.«�Midc , _. Y11"iiiiil x� �ma 11'' � � �:�. dEa.NPP ��::„..;. ".,,.,,,,...y:R :bi.wtirt�:. � �, mmx :'Y P' i. ,�:,' �:,... * „.: i;:iiMdY1w"”' ;: n'i 1;4'' ti I,1. 1w N",'. a! r!!!� »,y s N:' . � ^'^' X ?a ':+. aiiil.rMKKww,.b M��': my. iii”:.fi� Mdf „�4! • u ye M.MU� n� m M«;moi.; y a.,; xrw.a�`^' ,,.'�' tA^M«" /n. n...x♦Mx. M,,,. r' xw. xa Nf .'m� � ^ .. � � M is....—:=.1,4,::,i, ; zea' !'" ^a/ ,4iiiir w add4fy STw y .w.,... ..-,y `', ' v.. ,^H�...de �, . '.:µ3;: x.:. ,: xeiN Al6w tiiM:T�rw :,:ii;:' f M •„w MRH ? aN.a+',,�,..o �«M«fro`.' � u�.e :; � .,f P ., .. �. *�d� -,,,,;,,,,:+-4 y5ai...� ""d1Y'' ':.mw."" �'4AEP't"� ' w i H ' 4 I.,✓di,_ :: '� a„ b^ UM - 44,41::, ...ry 9r ^':k"/ "al:a /�! rA �.ww9. lMtii.Y..::..» dry A.: A•M P 9«e'. .. �.c ti :v.,.. x :: rm Y1Mo we N1 w' y e..WM r' � flMr' p�l ... � „ ,:' d1. .•o mvr +w •xf �'• :::°'"::::::j arM e«wi'An» ..yy�am, .�iiF�» —:;1,,,,,„': ,..« P '. , /9Mw< w v w ^ev"+' .ari. kka ,:1� ..';AR ,_ „-, R«•,..:,;,.' y * �4141.7.,s° ti ., x y, r M«„ " r: .. �. : � � y^. w+�ssi�►s' ��P as � a bpwtiM m,y::3,��,tt : , 4 ,1 06/ ',.. + .a . M• d 4 ppp b ,41j�1 rl�l/ / /,9 w li * 1*' a .7. la ' : ,•,..°�' y.,. ,;..` � y `l ^' ':M�, p: � .... vw'„iaociikM"«�«+`'Q M,. /^i&.y r,#M I P' v war 1 t f, —' r ', w �g �',, 4r 1w: a ., *1 * 410' :' , ' it H 'f; , ,, ' ' :,,,,, � 71/Iii,,, � tt,Cdr �, �• i:,. � ,q' r �, ..., a o mr .'Mi . 0 at ar a t ' Key Similariti• es Start Date: 03/11/2016 Completed: 02/15/2017 Cost: $233 M (Construction), $2.4M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Professional Services, Project Management, Data Collection, • Wastewater Collection Mapping, Engineering Studies Review, Cost Estimating Contact Information: Abel Fernandez, PE Systems Reference Telephone Number: 786-552-8933 • Wastewater Pump/Lift Email: Abel.Fernandez2©miamidade.gov Stations • Water Distribution Design Project Descption: • Wastewater Collection On July 2, 2013, the Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners Desi n approved R-597-13. The resolution mandated that a plan for the use of g up to $126 million of General Obligation Bonds be developed to extend • Hydraulic Modeling sewer service to commercial and industrial zoned areas across the • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ County which do not have reasonable access to wastewater services. Resilienc The intent of this Ordinance is to maximize economic development and y job creation within these commercial corridors. In addition to improving • Water and Wastewater the chances for economic development and job creation,the protection Master Planning of the County's water supply will also be improved and enhanced by Value En ineerin eliminating commercial/industrial septic tanks from these areas. • g g • Water and Wastewater As part of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's Integrated System Expansion Master Plan for Water,Wastewater,and Reclaimed Water,300 Engineering Engineering Studies Group,PA(300 Engineering)is working with Tetra Tech,Inc.in an agreement • g g to address comprehensive planning objectives for the sewer service • Cost Estimating/ extensions to commercial and industrial areas throughout the Commission Scheduling Districts, which will be used to meet regulatory requirements and support obtaining State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) State Revolving Loan Fund (SRF) loans or grants for the sewer service extensions. Pursuant to this agreement BODRs with an estimated total project cost of $233 million are being completed. These projects are located in commercial corridors across the Commission Districts and E3 TETRA TECH encompasses the expansion of the gravity sewer system, possible addition of wastewater pump stations and associated force mains,as well as water transmission main upgrades to meet standards for commercial water W distribution in locations where overlap with wastewater improvements ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A.: are identified. 300 Engineering is responsible of the complete analysis 36 1 Tab 2 • 1 , , - - Pro ioser Qualifications .,P a .,. ,.✓i.,: Similar Expensence and preparation for the BODRs corresponding to various Commission Districts, as well as technical QA/QC and preparation of schedules and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Class 3 for all thirteen (13) BODRs. Through this contract, 300 Engineering is providing services including, but not limited to the following: project management, project control, planning, QA/QC, review of previous studies (topographic, geotechnical, environmental and hydraulic modeling information), base mapping, municipal jurisdiction coordination with regulatory agencies and utilities, pipe material selection and collection methods, required permits identification, cost estimating, construction methods, routing, pump station location and alternatives evaluation. The projects generally encompass seven (7) phases: 1) Planning studies review and update to confirm all commercial properties within each area have been evaluated, layouts are utilizing existing infrastructure where possible, and all the requirements from the permitting agencies are being addressed; 2) Data collection and site visits, including review of As-builts and record drawings, GIS shapefiles, Hydraulic modeling files, LIDAR data and site visits to each of the proposed project areas to examine,record,and gather information about site conditions, utility conflict and existing facilities ; 3) Review of topographical, 4) geotechnical and 5) environmental and ecological information,6) Wastewater Hydraulic Modeling;and,7) Preparation and submission of BODRs including existing conditions evaluation, identification of regulatory requirements and basis of design (material selection, construction methods, pump station evaluation, alternatives selection, cost estimating). Relevant Highlights • Addressing comprehensive planning objectives for the sewer service extensions to commercial and industrial areas throughout the Miami Dade County Commission Districts, which will be used to meet regulatory requirements. • Project focused on economic development and job creation • Thorough knowledge of WAS D's water and wastewater system • Close coordination with municipality, utilities and regulatory agencies. • In the Planning, Engineering and Design of pump stations, our engineering team considered sea level rise projections through the planning tools developed and recommended by the SE Florida Climate Change Compact, including: Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, Region-wide and County-wide Sea Level Rise Inundation Vulnerability Assessments and USACE Sea Level Change Curve Calculator. ,, -,,,.....L-7 .--:,'-, �;: "/, �r, ^tri,., „�, �Mr ` u � -;. J� -� Y:.�k � •- m tr/..rNi ,. -�1/''� .-...,.., .� ,rxl «.,wr+. \:C, .,ate,..:.. ,..! y r •16 p a!:. "!> ,erw ,., �. . '...x:..w+ .:, ^,,; .:. �'r/ " r.��; „i,,.:',"ger..,". '°n►` ,, ':,;,,..«.. .;e.. 7a-77,�:* � ' ,�'�."L'��.,a-�Mi.,w"'„w y w<, _ ... i.`fi..,.'""?`�� .Q. ... ,..: /r ,.'� ''�./i / '.«""'X�n�.. a:::. r,",rim �' Mj,. - " ' ''r. ,. t M pr,� rawe'aw.Axu' '.,y . �'a .7.. S / ,r M, t '�., *-% "...,;:,.'' j :11:',31,0a y, 1 :,,../.' ,gip. , w-,, .7,- y,� ,,�,� ._,. � .� ? '. ^,.,, ,. .. e„xt• i„,,...1...,10,-,,, 3,',',. � . 0 °°' . '� ti��, / ..�....-+w., �,e ""��'... '"4,u.s^.�'"w«w,r:�iiAl',;,,w"'M.�Wt'ti:.: „«,.„..^2. w ....y.. l f .- ., _, � .� - :,s �+ � r.:!-,, i { i _� �11 {. .. X4 . r ef� � t r . . , wf'yw S G' ar" y, '';,., ..,."--' 1 ,::,,,, ,,,f . -E''',:i.1- lisq -,17.--7g:4! •:---LF. r 1 ig! u µ. �. „-.i.,. "/Ir rM YS Hifi -,. I '" . � w�, ; rnrcn „:. ..,...,/,,k,, <�. SSIIOOOZl ' � i T I- '� -1,. — ,,-7:::::,1--. " . w •+ «. i _ - ma .�, t.:2------- ^ ,1..ceif. Ai ': 1. .''''',... r VI ' -7 ----'. .. ill i k 1:4 \' ''''' , 4.' -4--"" i= 1 ',-r--- ',; :if ‘,,. , ..,,, - ;,::::-,--- --j• . ri .* ' - i } _ r o.! :.1 ! 1• ---i - ,, '. v'.»......:...-- . 1 ,d.,..p^""te " t,..i.:1•'....\\ � w h py^..: 7R = .. %..�, ..ya• +R,r Agro : - - : ''11,F.,:!'•:,,. . '1,7 'CV 2,,,...i,., *' ''- 'i',' :7-4 ti /,>'* . • 4-t" .:s P: . J_______ i I i:::i ,''',-, '4-,...,, " .-7:..t ' _lix:'.....30,-. , ' : ,,:. , *, ..7- --_-_-_- ,:i i ii , . IN_ ..,, `ilici, t. ,:, imp, " "' ' ,,,,,.. 111- st .- i z x.. t,r�w -,z— ....,,,,..- .7-4-_,..,_ i •�, _. rya �I�'' ,,+•, , A. . .. •I ii h .K 141.4_,.._..."k,,. •i.fir• .._. .. _... r.,y 4,, *1, ii : , a'G , :10000014k, . * o '"\:::....,:,....: r .. \ ' F "Y111 ---J ,E....7.....4 �. ii :c. x ! ,F:',.. . .,IMS►,.. ,,' °:.z.: �' .„ .4 -.....7.4 ., "^v . a of .R• - t t r i %. .' ,__. ,�_ ..,,r�`y-. } -!„.L.- --;,;17 Ali _•..__ 1v 11-9.7.71.,„: .++ ':� r:... 1:-..-7:!:4-L4,-:": /_fyv." 1r 37 r/,/i%lti y i;pry%rrr it ti/!:% I / , ' i,w��r Iri,u r/rr / �,n/i�1'1,/,,444,7,,,,m,1,, /rv/,,,,./.. / /, " // �//, Vii / r/uv:n ��/fir:/��/i��//, %zi//i,/;ri/'/4/rl/�//�% �''/ i r/ r/�I�,.,, r 4/h//it / , r, is/r,„Hr,� , .��,v/�r//�G/��r�//i S v r r,4;�iir(:// /C/,'/ j.' /�/f(pr,://(/%/4,r/,H/V!/ r.::.. ,,, r r v/i////HrUNi,�r/r,//�/��//��//�/�/��i /... ,;Vi /Ir //„/r S� H yrs ,1 /i 4<.- i 7 r NN/!q//n(h//r. ,/,/. ;;;;,,, PorMiami Water Transmission and D Systems Master Plan „_ . �{j ,,, "; PORT SIDE ,:,M ,a., ',.:,.,11 .. ' ii,:..Ir_`1,'TN'a111•UG_:1.•_i4, ...;M.Blb..t..f _.....--- �_...A...W.....M..,....::i...-........f,, .: ^,. Ga,:.w +.:...,' .,,`:,.;. +b.:;°•>... : ' n - � wm� �.� � � ��"o ; • ....„,::- ,.,..,,, , ---,,..,,_-, o 1kr4410.:' z",z `Viaa '(:� f @V ;x . V ."* .L1::, t/' 7.4pli:?.,. +s c s f .5nW,,4I M , �,.,..., „,,, f , v , r �_t ' p .ir ta + tcYw ^tt � fiw KERRY : %.i '4--A " s j il *r;17,,. R Y k ,y , `7::,,,,H;:`,.,' .t K "' " ''t- W+ "t6i ° I °aa :.+ :<'is 2!,ctx" �� T4 f t� x , M1�� '�mw wY: .� m ?" / yw m �� am =`1 iS .1,:''''' oN �. y ► am 4,,,04, ..,;,,„,;:k Vic..rf, ,',--01 rr 40 a ..s. 71Istaikf4titme a tk c:' > 41P1* *ii d „ boaw , .Mxn, ,«vp� �Vf , .st +/ S+ 3$ mr .'.. uNra e , ray 5::;/'*'* o- 3`ww �. _ : .:A , mwwwg--w rla yaCWfUi)W A,N qr soi i ;4 i yi- 4y i x A :' r >'' - - a trT of R+'aZ._. ...'� j FXdT,N� .._...�A mlc rn •,:Kr;rtaJ-Z:=12:—::":' � , ' � V;�YSU4Y "''• s ,._µ 1 <.. .... _,. F:A2Fdv x.41 'E; JI=%l�Rv Ott Key Similarities Start Date: 09/2016 Completed: Ongoing Cost: $60M (Construction), $300K (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role:Professional Services, Project Management, Cost Estimating, Wastewater Collection Field Inspection, Scheduling, GIS Services, Hydraulic Modeling Assistance, • As-built Review, Structural Analysis, Water Distribution Network Analysis, Systems SCADA Data Analysis, Constructibility Review, Utility Coordination • Water Distribution Design Contact Information: Howard Fallon, PE Wastewater Collection Reference Telephone Number: 786-552-8225 • E-mail: HJFAL01@miamidade.gov I Design • Water and Wastewater istem Ex ansionPro ect Descnption: System p The Port Miami is one of the most significant economic generators for South • Engineering Studies Florida. Through its cargo and cruise activities,the Port has determined that • Cost Estimating / it contributes over$18 billion annually to the South Florida economy and Schedulin helps provide direct and indirect employment for over 176,000 individuals. g The Port, including the water distribution system on the Port is owned and operated by the Seaport Department of Miami-Dade County. Existing utility infrastructure facilities at the Port Miami include potable water, sanitary sewer, electric, and telecommunication and drainage systems. Future needs for these infrastructure facilities are being planned for port expansion through the year 2035. As part of the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department's Integrated Master Plan, 300 Engineering Group, PA (300 Engineering) and Tetra Tech, Inc. are working for Engineering and Geological Services for Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water Planning Services to address comprehensive planning objectives which will be used to meet regulatory requirements. Pursuant to this agreement, 300 Engineering is providing engineering and Geographic Information System (GIS) services to update the hydraulic model for the Port Miami water distribution system. This project generally encompasses a water distribution system verification for E:!1 TETRA TECH system upgrades for the Port Miami water system. 300 Engineering is responsible for performing data collection and review, field investigations, updating the GIS Water Distribution Database, and Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Class 5 for upgrades to the ENGINEERING GROUP P.A. 1111 water system owned and operated by Miami Dade Water and Sewer III 38 Ta b 2 1 • Pro Pro•oser Qualifications Similar Experience Department (WASD) within the Port Miami limits. Moreover, 300 Engineering is also assessing the feasibility of upgrading an 8-inch water main along the cruise terminal wharf. Through this contract,300 Engineering is providing services including Professional Services, Project Management, Cost Estimating, Field Inspection, Scheduling, GIS Services, Hydraulic Modeling Assistance, As-built Review, Structural Analysis, Water Distribution Network Analysis, SCADA Data Analysis, Constructability Review, Utility Coordination, among others. The team is providing evaluations and immediate and master plan recommendations for the water transmission and distribution systems serving and Aim ilii1111111111111111.111LA with PortMiami. PortMiami is experiencing existing "' °' " --1411111101111 4:0' water distribution deficiencies due to increase water , demands for ship filling activities and aged water :1- {, distribution systems. Tetra Tech performed hydraulic ,� num modeling, field and SCADA data acquisition, hydraulic model calibrations and identification 11111111111111r - -M 000 of existing deficiencies and future capacity AA requirements necessary operations maintain o erations to multiple cruise ships during peak berthing periods. Additional services included extensive and detailed coordination with PortMiami, WASD, and design consultant staff to , . �gl ,� ' 1 expedite planning and design to meet conditions for 2018 facilities. , hit f4 pyq The project includes multiple design scenarios modeled using - InfoWater for sizing of subaqueous large diameter transmission C` "' mains to provide future flows and adequate system pressures on aY"` the Port. wa"-1 Wifi„ '3 - 0 •'N .4••'►•� - t-rt....- - 'fit .e s :.,y,. ,•- +' For the Port Miami Water Distribution System Analysis and Upgrades ,r'' Recommendation, 300 Engineering is providing: S k : • 1. An updated Desktop Verified Water Line network for Hydraulic Modeling efforts; 2. Documentation for the field investigation of the 6,000 LF of 8-inch water line running along the cruise terminal wharf; 3. Coordination with Sunshine One Call to obtain list of utility companies providing services near the 8 inch water line along the cruise terminal wharf,to identify potential conflicts based on information received with existing utilities, and highlight these conflicts on the GIS shapefiles; 4. Documentation of the limits of the structural components along the cruise terminal wharf (using as-builts and previous surveys as record documents). Also, a review of the tie backs included in the Port Miami as-builts, along with the utilities identified through the Sunshine One Call utility effort to conduct a constructability review of upgrading this 6,000 LF of 8-inch water line for a larger diameter water 77. main. L 5. Class 5 Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (OPCC) for the improvements identified by the hydraulic modeling within the -.*"1” �-.. .. Port Miami area. qr a , r Relevant Highlights • Field Verified update of the Water Line Network of the Port Miami GIS 5! 39 Rehabilitation/Replacement of 2of 48 ,.. along __ ,_ neCana asps o esu n• RePo M. .,:.�..•Ait,;,,,, „,,,,,, . •ar ..»' l• BCwv N N x , r< :.Sm. : •♦ ';:,,,:::,,,.,,,,,,-,:k1; .e. ... ,�YL_1 . ,... K ,n• ., R r ,....:,_,i. „x, u . - - - „.;i£ wµ,. ., , -- , -•. ..'4-4,i;,.1:8.,: ',4,,,. le 4:.,74. Al . ... � , ,, :, ,, "�' y.',40 ♦„. �'� :'"*....:41' � A.': ` • yam. : r 47:-'. A !. ,4� r” ''.yw^'N//Y :� . !*: `�2 �►`-�... � ,.',..40141,--‘.4- a ..,.,. ,' w,.,w ... Nµ /MNA v - __ ;''” '�"'i ,w,vv..or.., � -,?' +G. •lid...-.. ..,, "� i.,;,.,. .� P•. ar".' nn» .., W„ u y � •-:-•.w ! _ ��;, . _. T^" +"�a'Jra y.. :..� !�/.4,,.W .. .. .r, ,eatt.,l.':.,H/ i'nvw a/.. r£/M, ��:, �.,.w..r^....::. .. _..-...�;�" x .2.- .,�. ..n� ,..'. "`•�,.x y.,y�' •.:. YE, r ,:.•!� .�.-.410:::,-;,.;',,,,' �1 � ..�,, 4£ ..1 �:/d Huraa v,.� ._ .. ._...�+. ,; S.'"11* ,- .,, '-'1:` • K-..'y" r :1.74,2*'-- .A. g�+y�• s t �,�• r£uxmnmM4r££ '•i �rrur,a>x:v/r :£�rx!n: n --- --- '• -- .......-.-'`•. ,.--.�,. _�.._- ,:zat. • '�P'1� �_.l�'� !.. y IRn, �'�'O r^ Ili� �: r .ii& a ., M �� f r .."'-'11-,..-- d.� r .:.•,r;�-'0�"Z"•a'wµ ! •A.,,.•w».. �►^1*iy ,pp1, yr, +,. r•y,(' 5u :�,' -_ _, ry...•- e. r.:;,:14:4A-„,11 T 1 ..a.� :�..'i�fN'N� ,•�.r f..M.-...lei.),:. � � r ,_ a •1-.�� 9�h�'v� 1 A�:•. r , _. �r.q(•�^o�..• i'� •r. A i• y 7A4�Af'Yf%::, .x.,+'n w'd`'H `Pa 4'„ .•,.. r'"°moi,31 .' , d ai: a ti d /r•.% „�•Yav/,x lr r..,n'!'x4'/A� .. ',�� l, , :�AZ� ♦.fiy -. #1,.:,..,.�,/ ':-.�.: 't w,�lyt x ,,,„,...1,,,,,,,,„-,,,,„,„,,,,, � ..:.�1�syo�1';�y�4 ,::: dA,,�d 42,p�S .naax^w a�wx�i;e,�(�*t^ ,�w::: r ...... „� .�i Vr�� . . , ^",,,. :. Vii, 1,.�,`� �a,, 1 R'��!,,..., mY f'fn xea..::.,e "x�.. ��/W� 9,6•.,.,.. ., �•.:: ... � ': .'w. •`• ,r � : .`. ':mn. p r� � ,:Rd .,,.rx .. H:l9�:. 2'�. 4» S • ✓, 4$ '�!.,, � v. "nW!41d""v 2 .'tF� din; .., ,v.+:.� .� r.,..^ ,,.w n, v� .,Q � 3�.9.W<:' r^S : : '�,, r� �k�., �rvr�;';F+v -4. "" '�� ..;`1^ .. � -.. ., .,.,.,/� ,,. � t,.:„a`.! .. �.x6r M,•„�...., �.<'"`�....f 4:^'�,.�...„, v-::''''',"'''' .::.. �. a•: J „ ,,,,...,,,f,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„°,7,4 ,:0,14, @.,r'. . .. .. . r”' �:N 1.^.. .,� ..an•to ,..r.... .......'� 1.,.... ..._:.p: _ ...,,. „� .,.a.,,.,... P. x*..6 „ , r/.,.s v� , ,, .. ...,. ..v.. : .....x hN.!)%:: . �A' "awn IC7 /:.�� -..'_„� '@'."` ... r... ..,.,.,,CcY.;,.n,Yn,.v..».. v. S. .x � wn x i.•.r.:4. �..� '::: :. '....y v iv tr),: ... ,,,�•� �,..,. � � r..., � ,� ., ^,, .., c €Na�a��,a.�x� ��....� x xtw ., M,4.,,r ! � 1 r4wpss^�`f �� 4 d� . ... �,.:.�.A .. #?R,.@�•�� .,:,�:Sr»,u ,a'8 ' � ,. � _ ... _..E 3.»„ �.,,. :,, � d.•:� >ei M �. /' ti � a.� .. ��a:',..:.,xn,..r :.� .,.:�,:. ..., ., '• :, ..: �...::?w f� a:;,x. x9 �^8>k?kN,NC.,. tk;;;:,7*'*,k;..:;::;'(:'+:;';''"''''''-'"'''' .�,, x.,n, ,:b':��✓ a �'vk »` xro.. .,h, t1 ^ a ?ro v „r5;454,.£4tpfC +::r�. . �� +:! +�' Y >, ,::.. ,^?. {� t,,,r: �, �`,�";G�.+kE�a.wt.\1x1a t• a b ,rx �R „ . „w .. .,. ..„.....u._ 4.,.. ... ...::.-.7 Ir',.,%.a.i� �A@N2y..rx,w n �,,��,r�y'!�' �'� R '. .. .. aai,.a ... .,.,��x.,t�. .. �.! Ala, ..a...Q,._. !. . a '' �r ... ., + - k ...... r,..,..d... ... ...,........ ...:_...... ... ....:..,:.ro.,.�ax: . ,y� 'eY�^ .aaw rr. ?d,,<: ._,• , �a•n, c: A,:.:». ,,_..A.,, :,.• x. 9a :.ax r ko .... x ::: ':i.,..3x...xp�. ...,,... ...:� . r.�1 'hr F .,1:..,.�., . .... .... ..:,..... .,. ......:: ......,C ...,.x':a.,...y r., . � 4 �//4�..,. . R . .,, ,:�y.. ,;,:::�� ,�;. :. ..,9:.....:�m:�,,.,....t... P. �!n�, n. ��., Hv,n lAl �^. ,{Sr� •. } ,'+1:. ,� p. ,,,..� ,.:;,. , ..,,. -:,:: �, �''A a• ,. x:, a � ��txr£ t K �x: ,1„,,,,,,,,,,44,,t.:4:,,' �' l�67 & �.... M�...+:: •, .. .,..,:.nt ...Mr :,:,,; :.•. .�-�'.:: l. r�y� r: a,` �3y.��`.ra ,L t..•e� '�A x..\ e +�i v b sa r �tf ;��r'� J: :l'`. ;1440;4.1" -. a• t G �p v,:; N: 5 . ^12�'�: r^ if",.2-..L.,_.:21k,ilt.„:1, r-it 1r * , ''' ' * ' ' : r y , \lot,, ,., „..,. ..,.. , . ,.., ,. 4, ., ,*,,,,(,:-.. . - ...:.,....,,,-,..,;,...„,7:i-:**-- -7 r ,.:.',•'*;•--,4;:'4 KeYSimilarities Start Date: 01/2015 Completed: 04/2015 Cost: 22.25M Construction), $150K (Engineering• Fee) ,: it; _ ' _ -_,, _ , ' -; . $ ( v.:: i ry.„..4:,... mtr,.,, 2,....c.e..;:......_.ji:„....,,,,,..-,' '''' - , ,, Wastewater Collection Firm's dole: As-built Review, Route alternatives evaluation, Utility Coordination, Cost Estimating, Hydraulic Modeling, Field Observations, Systems Scheduling, Engineering Studies • Wastewater Collection Contact information: Dan Edwards, FE Design Reference Telephone Number: 786-232-5257 Jelin Email: DJEDWOI @miamidade.gov Hydraulic Mo g • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ Project Descption:Res�l�ency j • • Water and Wastewater 300 Engineering Group, P.A. (300 Engineering) was selected as part of the PMCM Team to prepare the Basis of Design Report (BODR) for the Master Planning Rehabilitation/Replacement of 2.5 Miles of 48-Inch PCCP FM along Value En ineerin Biscayne Canal between NW 57th Avenue and 32nd Avenue. • Engineer-1h.g This project required Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department W. to Engineering Studies rehabilitate/replace the 48-Inch FM due to the lack of structural integrity. • Cost Estimating / 300 Engineering as part of the PMCM team assisted the Department with Scheduling the preparation of the BO for the subject FM. Our team performed the following main activities to complete the BODR: • Request from utility companies/agencies information on existing utilities within the project area • Collection of existing right-of-way data • Review of most recently available aerial images and adaptation of CAD drawings • Identification of preliminary pipe layouts for field and office study • Visual site surveys of existing surface improvements, particularly those indicating the presence of underground utilities such as manholes, valve boxes, and pavement patches • Detailed visual site surveys of existing us--a of lots and properties • Evaluation of preliminary pipe alignments nd adjustments as required TET1 TEC H in order to identify conditions that would allow for the choice of a particular proposed FM layout I iik ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. 40 Tab 2 1 Pro .oser Qualifications Similar Experience The following subtasks were performed and delivered to WASD: Utility Coordination The utility coordination process included contacting Sunshine One Call 811 to request a project Design Ticket. The Design Ticket No. 35403781 provided the contact information from Utility Agency/Owner (UAO) providing services within the project boundaries. As-builts were gathered and reviewed. Base Mapping Confirmation of public right-of-way was obtained using the information from the Design Ticket, Field Inspections, Utility Coordination, As-builts, Section Maps and Plat Records obtained through Miami-Dade County. The legal description of selected properties along the proposed routes were used to locate corresponding plats. A project Base Map was updated with the utility information obtained from the above mentioned sources for each route. Route Selection A series of alternatives were considered and evaluated.Feasibility and practicality constraints resulted in the reduction of these alternatives to four(4) routes.The selected routes were based on _.__ <f existing conditions, current construction techniques, proposed - pipe material, and required permitting agencies involvement. ;L • The objective was to minimize impacts to the environment and � --. property stakeholders while addressing the needs of WASD in meeting their obligations as a public entity. _ =- Material Selection A material evaluation matrix was created to select the ideal iond material for each of the proposed routes. The following nine (9) • .3 • factors were the driving criteria to select the pipe material: 11.6 • WASD and contractor experience and familiarity • Connection to existing lines • Pipe laying length and weight • Pipe joint flexibility • Internal corrosion resistance/cathodic protection/ soil corrosivity • Useful life span (Min. 50 years) • Failure characteristics • Diameter • Construction Cost Route Selection Methodology The selected material suggested by the Pipe Material Evaluation Matrix was included in the Consultant Evaluation Matrix for each route.The following nine (9) factors were the evaluation criteria for the route selection: • Minimize adverse traffic impacts (MOT) • Minimize public agency coordination/permitting • Impact on businesses and/or public facilities/stakeholders • Constructibility • Maintenance/Accessibility • Minimize impact to schedule • Hydraulic Impact • Minimize ROW or easement acquisition • Minimize project cost (OPC) For the Consultant Evaluation Matrix, a detailed comparison analysis was performed for each factor per each route with a corresponding weight depending on the impact was assigned to each alternative. This allowed our Team to select the most suitable route for this project. Recommendations were presented and approved by WASD based on the analysis results. 41 , , ,, , : 1 //,,, , , / 7 i /// 4, fir//i: , ,:/,r!;/��//ii a/•, ,, / , .n: Wastewater Transmission Sistem Hydraulic Computer Model - Wastewater Gravity Sewer Modeling ,,, „,,, . _ ______ , . _ 4 , ear / r , ,. ,:....- . \ -„,,,,4141‘...„::000„ i \ . a, /r < e, ,:,, , - , - 4, - .4, t p ,,,,, it tri !4,41/4f/, r/it// .h. N,, 00 40414 �`P` x+n 1 i ({r Cdr ,://'� 4. ,,.in , ,,-4 li,// ° i : y y. I - iiLimaii. I -- i ti 44....w,:6.W.erg.L,,,,,,2,;.......<YN,.. ,/ L Key Similarities Start Date: 12/2011 Completed: 03/2013 Cost:$200K (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Project Management, Procurement, Hydraulic Modeling, Systems Master Planning Contact Information: Peter Jelonek, PE • Water Pump Stations Reference Telephone Number: 786-552-8226 • Hydraulic Modeling E-mail: pjelo0l @miamidade.go • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ *Professional Experience of Franklin A. Torrealba,PE Resiliency • Project Descption: Water and.Wastewater � Master Plannin 300 Engineering Group,P.A. (300 Engineering) staff was selected by Miami- g Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) to provide engineering, • Engineering Studies planning, evaluation, analysis, and wastewater modeling services. The "Overall Task Order” covers Special Services at the request of the Miami- Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). WASD has a gravity sewer model which includes 1018 basins. The gravity sewer collection system (pipes only) was developed using interpolated Basin 237 Stage-Storage Comparison r x - alb ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. AO s 'O VA Z'' 42 r ';,A%i rr//i%",YN xr rrii,;� //�fi /./...///�//!i .o,i i„,../..�„//...r/.:.,fir/./�/:,,d/. N r r ' :;;.,N/r,..n„un..if.,,. ..;. ..I /,•.,/,a..r/r//n,.:q,r„',p-,dH(ri°„,,.::,'.,:. s. .,,,,:,:,,:,/ r„,,;,,r/,.../„,,/�/r /!..///�..,/.. ,/ 1 F /( ,,. r /rH//r.,,,. , ,,,//,,,/,., !,,, ,.. ,.,.,y',. •.. ” .,,.,,.rrn,p,., :•. •,,� r ;.j/r ,1 // :is,r ni I,/:' ;% •/% rr//,//d ;r/,u, /,,<;!r;�,r//i/n r ✓i,Hvau;:rri/yy/i r.:,.,,,/ r.:.,..., a„,ii,/r, / r ;/470;010/0err//r�4/////,,,yrl,r n./ ,r'�,;,.: //j//r,�•%///////,‘//;*/y�i/y//(Hr�r//iry'/nr//n,i,ii,/x/'/,n xi'i,i. n,.,,;/,i - Y „ . ,,,` : / %!9i r/r di s/a Ta b 2 1 • Qualifications Similar Experience invert elevations. While the gravity pipe network is incorporated into the overall countywide wastewater model, it is not currently operational. The current operational model is focused on the pressured system of pipes and pumps using SCADA data real-time pump on/off set points. As part of the continued development of the wastewater model, WASD sought to incorporate the gravity system into the model. However, WASD wanted to use a simplified but accurate methodology to expedite model development, reduce model run times, and minimize the associated level of effort. The proposed methodology incorporates two simplifying assumptions: • Use extrapolated invert elevations for the gravity sewer system pipes. The current extrapolation methodology starts with the known pipe invert elevation at the wet well and extrapolates inverts upstream as a function of pipe length and diameter. Alternatively, inverts can be extracted from as-built information which is a time consuming effort that will still result in some information gaps. • Use the gravity system stage-storage curve to route gravity basin inflows (design hydrographs) into the pump station wet well. The alternative is to simulate the gravity system in detail which requires an extensive effort to develop the system and will substantially increase model run times. Relevant Services Performed to various WASD's Basins: • Developed the detailed gravity model with as-built invert and rim elevations. • Inflow hydrographs were already apportioned to each manhole in the interpolated model provided by WASD, the same ratio was used when distributing the current billing records for such basins.The unit hydrograph was updated based on the Dry Weather Flow hydrograph provided by WASD for the basins. • Obtained and confirmed pump curves,wet well inverts, pump on and off levels, pressure curves, and SCADA for PS located within basins. • Stage storage curves for the interpolated and as-built model were compared for both basins to highlight major differences in data accuracy. • Stage storage models were created using both the interpolated model and the as-built model storage curves. • Diurnal pressure patterns for both basins were obtained from WASD, applied to the interpolated model run, and increased until an overflow (or near overflow) condition was observed. This increased pressure pattern was used as a basis for all other model runs. • All model scenarios (Interpolated, As-Built, Interpolated Stage Storage, and As-Built Stage Storage) were run to obtain a history of wet well water levels, inflow, and outflow hydrographs. • Prepared the following comparison graphs/tables: • Interpolated stage storage versus as-built stage storage •' :''°. ':« , - (and error histograms). •..___.__...._..._....._.._.._......._.........-_.._w...w.�....__...__ • Inflow and outflow hydrographs at the wet well (comparing the four model scenarios outlined above). . • Wet well water levels (comparing all four scenarios) Our partner, Tetra Tech is currently performing these services under a separate contract for WASD's Master Planning aMM:`IF i,{'6A WMR&Ml..'M:M,'AS tl.';•.�11✓}.FR1.•'•.'NW-.'dR/ .rnn.n .rmnnm,. pq,NfP. 4n'AMA' ,•'tlk'3A«wNrw•s>...,Nunwq.•N%b,ntltl.J+..ilw.w iMw.x.aM•raveM ,.... _, •W pw.H «.x,l b u.«Srox•xgn aa«n•4awgo-roYl_e't 5w'«lIM w'«�4,..w........, ...._.; ''' :.#'N:x. 43 �!{ii/ /% i/4c/4/.,/./i.ri/rl/ ,,,„,„e,/,'„,rr/ q ;-G:lnd.G•i�s�(G r///rrA., r //a a,/,/,/, ///�;H /r:,rr,Y'/ry / rr/..G dr „r , �N';.N %� /// . /a x BasedModels/ // n5// N,/rG/ /4a �4 GIS `'ate=.... �,.. '•" 4. i!t q .•"`'",:^„,,,.. 3a, -4-..wpp--.44110pt-„,,,----...„, w:., �wm::. 11",,,,, ,y'qr vi .,f 7: ee 4^,.,, g a., u`M ,y. w.^mo..;e✓e"• ,.... Y f ! r ws e;r ,,A \ , ;^}, y._,..,., - •:'a'e'',*,,,k,,,, •SAYY,,� �' ...._�. �. . F._: *4 - 'a.- r aa1;:c'''f;''' akrf a - / 4.. u � C iii- ,,,.. - , ----______ isivo b.,` ,.' 'w"... /: @rrl e°Fyn agct n'W AR f yl Sa ...,:n`•de°�a...,,- 'a� 'd. fn ; h a'krkgfr;.,:,,,,;jwy,�,� ,,k&4`a" ,. ,is,' '1 ,, : .is .:""---.7:'....,,,,,,,,,, ."--7x+,... :rrnrSY, f y$Sr' y o .$ '"`_.— ,,, o$ e ..w r'f �'a�.� .:,;,,,,. xY SsSFf,,,,, '''' 6-, ' 6 Y)a �+ t''''''''''---—---- _. Ili � wi v.. d� h'�. �'�p�hn~ v `�''I,•ay.� 7fXY.f, _ Y xk '"a a'GrI �s''''' k nla g.,. rt.^rc •�. as i�p"° , w•- a: '': fw, f q ,:,haS. a s�`'a„i yV r$�apan 8` ^�"'.x.'t� �K �ypr' ,a� ti.,.,� o,,: � \kr.�a i.w 8$5. ,�3 k" r f '"b a,,.,r % .';)7,"';'''''''''' w�,, P$wth',a9a,a J... h�y,� �, aaµ e y„ S�.,...., y.,,Y,as 9.7� Nat ti wa /r Key Similarities Start Date: 01/2007 Completed: 12/2010 Cost: $2.5M (Engineering F ee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role:Project Management,Planning,GIS Based Hydraulic Modeling, • Wastewater Collection Pipelines, Program Controls Contact Information: Dan Edwards, PE Systems Reference Telephone Number: 786-232-5257 • Water Pump Stations E-mail: DJEDW01@miamidade.gov • Wastewater Pump/Lift * Professional Experience of Franklin A.Torrealba, PE Stations • ProjectHydraulic MOdel�ng CC SLR ,oda tation/ 300 Engineering staff provided engineering services for the development, • / / p and calibration of the water and wastewater hydraulic computer model. Resiliency The upgraded and enhanced model will facilitate WASD to meet the • Water and Wastewater growing needs of the County and to perform capacity evaluations for Master Plannin new developments that wish to connect to the existing system. g • Construction WASD's water system supplies, treats, and distributes over 300 MGD of Management potable water through a distribution network of more than 7,000 miles of En ineerin Studies pipes, 76,000 valves, and 34,000 hydrants.The water system model consists • g g of more than 237,000 pipes and 161,000 demand nodes making it the largest water model in North America. I # . 1,,:.,i+44.+f,.{+ )' ,, :fir y, — ,, , m 4. �,4.y t e i< • �**#'.Z.Sty Y : [ $ s k. • 4 14:::*:'. • 4 4 14.4r ir.t 1 st, ' ., ** .., rt, el! .fe k *.+i.JM444. .RwK4r 4 a 8* ' ; i yR * * 4 e r b 4,,,r , : ' i{i l'..# f $.444 417 V. s. ::. e in 4. e• 1 w 4 4 *......4 p '`qu, ,fs r .• . "av: :1.#8 : 4,'set #..,* .. 4 t 44.1*V. * 4 t4., . . a w ±* 4,,,,,. r t i* � •••.... 4 �.,�\ " � 4 ',,,, *4 r dl. !":14 4 4::h' C.1! R*• �►pG' Hy r{u .. 4 4 s $ 4 4 4 a•sir 4 In fa ►4 ' 4c4f4Le 14, 4. : ,* a a 1+r « 4•4.4 '" �w . 4Mw+ 4P s 4"< 4r k4 a+ "s . ,,* 1M0, !!*4O .4 k 4 4, 4. +6 ark$MIF :4 f 4 ENGINEER[NG GROUP, P.A. C 4 «'ei 4'4 4 # • , '.'` *. 4 4 9 9 f%O 4 +4 •r f 44 Ta b 1 2 . 1 , . . , aprouser Qualifications Similar Expenence WASD's wastewater collection system is a complex network, comprised of more than 1,000 pumpstations, 2 500 miles of gravity .. �. -" : "� p " .� .is*w'.Awe swrw,� ..r "r�e F,u�: w{ .... •�.t'.-szz a+.:r f --------ar 7.e�.1.:....�..�t a*r o- ,.w...,w ..,..................,...........:........,....----;-----4rt.,., sewer, 750 miles of force main, three wastewater treatment plants, ' ' ""• 1,r,...--- -0,,,` w,.,,�., _.. " and 15 wholesale customers. The wastewater system model consists _ :.: ,__.�-_ ,-_ - , ...W.£ " of more than 90,000 pipes and 2,200 pumps. ,..,,.,,,,it-.1..........;,:-.a....r7,7-»>xawa an:saaa v.,.,w.MMm,�ww..n.'«.r . ,,...,.., ;wxa.,,ro.r•.wk6 Daae w <.W...".,x.,ws..w,Wn«.;.,.,,. x>: fL rlpx ,,.. wM.—.... Wastewater Model Features �:. Modeling Software Evaluation/Selection: Evaluated modeling —`"" -- --- software that WASD is using and reviewed other available software. „up - - a Performed an analysis to determine the best software for WASD's wRars.t.---ae` 7-�� &ia�s xv • unique needs and requirements and presented rating analysis and Pump sa14at aa00hr. . recommendation to the County. These software programs were included in the evaluation: XP-SWMM, InfoSWMM,InfoWorks CS, Mike -.7 m�,.. ,-Mo.. +... x r1s 31s Urban, and S W M M 5.0. GIS-Based Wastewater Model Development: Developed a GIS-based hydraulic model for WASD wastewater collection system.The development of the hydraulic model included data collection and as-built drawings and utility atlas reviews, QA/QC of Arc GIS databases, demand analysis and allocation, and modeling strategy to assist in meeting the growing needs of 2 million county residents, assist in meeting compliance requirements (EPA/FDEP), and evaluate capacity for new developments to be connected to the existing system. The model is comprised of a mixed gravity-pressurized pipe scenario incorporating over 1,000 pump stations, large gravity interceptors, and a RDII component, using SCADA data as source of field data to measure model accuracy. Initial Calibration and Field Investigation Program: Conduct field investigation for the wastewater collection system involving (2:.,. MW ..correlation of model simulation results to SCADA records, and ;; wmww:- m:.,:,.,,,,...7 , / Hyp adJustment of high level parameter such as hYdrographs, pump °r' rs /Hy,%% curves, network configuration and clean up. 1",74,- ,,,,, , Water Model Features * r "' f-- :---7-i :.v .i1�1hM.Pn.N...... e.:. :e '14'......_,____________. .�.ww.rwmnr.. Modeling Software Evaluation/Selection: Evaluated modeling W. • software that WASD is using and reviewed other available software. :71-y ' :q ---' ` �.: Performed an analysis to determine the best software for WASD's -7. " :� "" unique needs and requirements and presented rating analysis and Wz .. , '�...-.,`�_ x recommendation to the County. ..., - . ..., . . GIS-Based Water Model Development: Developed a GIS-based EPS model for WASD water distribution and transmission systems. The development of the model included data collection and as-built drawings and utility atlas reviews, QA/QC of Arc GIS databases,demand analysis and allocation,and the creation of Min.,Max.,and Avg. Day EPS modeling scenarios. Field Testing and Calibration: Developed and conducted a field testing program that included more than 80 flow and pressure tests, 40 C-value tests and continuous pressure monitoring at over. South Dade System Evaluation: Utilized the hydraulic model to evaluate improvement to support development in the south area of Miami-Dade county. Raw System Model:Developed the hydraulic model of the Raw Water System consisting of 79 wells and associated pumps. Our partner,Tetra Tech is currently performing these services under a separate contract for WASD's Master Planning 45 /,„„„11,„,,, ,,,,, WASD's Installation of 16 Main Along :-.. 1, NW 36th 4 ,...„. . , : , ,Street Curtiss to LeJeune Road - -- .,,,t , w w+' ,, . . . 9tv, � ^,.y„....n=a+Rp�q nwvw.rw.ww.,w,mmww � �f';7 ,.. • '4'0* r ^— ' ''' ' ' 4 regilig 4.' ' w ^+n i tdo,**Ir ' ' ' ' ., ' '''' k t 2� pdp 'a r g' � tib,` h r�' �' �. ay rr �yy,, x Y y " ,.� r u av � �4 x Nur....ci ,, .. ,. : ,.,,„ , _ ,...,...,„ cai , <, : . . .0,...4.,..„..,.. ,.."'_ --- .. .., , . t , 1 3 pr f ilf4 lag ,' Key Similarities Start Date: 12/2015 Completed: On-Going Cost: $3M (Construction), $300K (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Engineering design, cost estimating, preparation of Water Distribution Desi n technical specifications, utility coordination, site inspections, scheduling, • g coordination with stakeholders, limited procurement, permitting, and • Water and Wastewater construction support services for 8,900 LF of a new 16-inch Ductile Iron Master Planning water main via open cut. Contact Information: Eduardo Luis • Water and Wastewater Reference Telephone Number: 786-268-5374 System Expansion E-mail: Eduardo.luis@miamidade.gov • Engineering Studies • Cost Estimating / Project Descnption: Schedulin As part of the Agreement with the City of Miami Springs, the Miami g Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) is required to upgrade the water system to increase water pressure and provide optimum fire flow protection.This project involved the replacement of an undersized 8-inch Cast Iron (CI) Water Main with a new 16-Inch Ductile Iron (DI) Water Main "'"""'""""'' '' `'N '" " `' - via open cut. The 8,900 LF water main will run along NW 36th Street from Curtis Parkway to NW 42nd Ave (N. Lejeune Rd). Services provided by 300 Engineering include, but were not limited to: design, permitting, cost estimating, preparation of technical specifications, utility coordination, site inspections, scheduling, coordination with stakeholders (City of Miami Springs,FDOT,Miami Airport)limited procurement and construction support services. The project is currently under permitting. It is key to the project the coordination with FDOT since this major roadway will be impacted.300 Engineering developed a MOT plan to ensure traffic disruption is minimal. Detailed services provided by 300 Engineering are as follows: Engineering Design Services • Attendance to kickoff meeting and preparation of a draft and final Meeting Minutes • Coordinate and schedule topographic survey of proposed work site, as per WASD requirements • Coordinate and schedule geotechnical study of proposed work site, _ as per WASD requirements ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. •• Site visits w; Tab 2 . 1 Pro .oser ualifications Similar Experience • Utility Coordination • Coordination with recent and future projects to avoid conflicts and repetitious construction. • Identification of Municipal Jurisdiction's Special Requirements • Gather and review background information and as-built's • Identification of Utility Conflicts and Documented Information • Investigate and develop index and mapping of potential project impacts resulting from existing environmental conditions • Development of Complete Engineering Plans (30%, 60%, 90%, 100%submittals) • Identify Pavement Repair or Pavement Reconstruction Requirements and Proposed Pavement Resurfacing limits • Signing and Pavement Markings Plans • Project Schedule Update in Microsoft project • Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost • Obtain required permits • Contract and Bid Documents (Front-End Documents and Construction Specifications) Limited Procurement Support Services • Coordinate and respond to questions and issue addenda. • Prepare for and attend a Pre-bid project briefing. • Review and comment on Schedule of Values. • Provide technical support to WASD PM during preparation of recommendation for apparent low bidder. • Provide input and assistance during contract award process. Limited Construction Support Services • Attend pre-construction meeting. • Periodic site inspections. • Shop drawing review. • Attend construction meetings. • Respond to RFI's. • As-Built Certification. • Project close-out, punch list and final project certification. FURNISH AND INSTALL A 16-INCH WATER MAIN ALONG NW 36TH STREET FROM CURTISS PARKWAY (NW 57TH AVE.) TO N LE JEUNE ROAD (NW 42ND AVE.) PCTS NO. 14501, ER W016943 .. ss. ` Ta4--'-f-43'LL---1-4.? .t S, �J k � +— i t• r yy .� _ , _'>>.._. � �'�-• 1� ,tis. + ",..,..r .. - vMww�""�,.. 'w► :IY"' v:.,,.t +v,.w �-.7- '! —'.S •, �,..�'—i� �i �p� ^"ti w`i:� .�R} �J 3 J� 11 � h4iApN tTl?Lt N4A r h:.41 A...LO T it* 47 11'..' qy Mains Replacement Program (SWRP) , Phases I & II . , ,,,,,,,,„ , *1,17; ., . ' ,., ,,, * ' ,,. '1/4*" ., . , * r '' : r . - + x . - 1/4' \4b' ' mac?„ ry/ wpo”&f , n r e «TM ..:k.,� '� ", ' :,t4" a 4' a, °" rrx a. , • yya : Va g pb:r'3 S✓'dSasv"-'N, cn ,C. 'ie':::":?"..0;c;.1.2'7:1:4;:**X0''''' ' ..`...:.:.:..k .. .:'.... '"'�M'• � � : A. _ ..h•'4�� , , „ y :'v �� 6* � :0,,,";�*, .. w :7,4— k .ww 4we°"v axzh rP'r.a:� )�fk,,,,.,,,,,:::'*...: o 'yz w.,. y. wa,aK . , ;r T . � , , d:y%,a" +.,, % iFa w,ax" a». ,, � 4-,4%, U ° :n / X a,« ar 7 '� e ,a � dx p3PM1 xrGzv *a`F p ',:t i Tti y Y y:c ' ; ; - , y', a IM _ O4; :i J 4 �+! 'Y Y, aw yid" } , P « He Eby ��z . k " '- :,74.1 , 1, c-.5 (-li 4 ,i I . 4 .,, ''.. ,,,, . , ,1, w II .,1 •,a�{° r '£.,,. ry/ .. .✓ > R,1.-- r .., ,,.ax»izrH'ea"Ayy i 0 9g/S x � .. ,yy Y/7 ,/3 k,. M M 'W,, a� ::Y w s e: q"$ ytp A +.x 4.sx 1Ws" " ti . ,' Key Similarities Start Date: 08/2011 Completed: 2013 Cost: $466,744 (Construction) $400K (Engineering) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Water distribution system evaluation, GIS analysis, outreach, • Water Distribution Design preliminary design, bidding, permitting, construction Contact Information: Adrian Triana,MBA, CGC • Corrosion Control and Reference Telephone Number: 786- 268-5414 Remediation E-mail:Adrian.Triana@miamidade.gov • Water and Wastewater * Professional Experience of Franklin A.Torrealba, PE Master Planning • Water and Wastewater • Project Descnption: System Expansion y p WASD created the "Small Water Mains Replacement Program (SWRP)" • Construction or "Overall Project" to replace all small water mains (6" or less) while Management minimizing water losses, improving system pressure and providing fire flow En ineerin Studies protection. The objective is to identify, rehabilitate, replace or renew • g g the small diameter aging infrastructure. This program will, in part, satisfy • Cost Estimating / a condition by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in Scheduling issuing a 20-Year Water Use Permit to the County which requires a reduction in water losses in the County's distribution system by 14.25 million gallons per day (MGD) prior to 2026.An integral component of the Overall Project is the "Dual Water Main Replacement Program". The objective of this program is to abandon deteriorated small diameter rear easement water mains and connect to new water mains in the front of the properties. A Phase I-Pilot Project of the "Dual Water Main Replacement Program"was completed with the objective of developing and field testing program implementation procedures during actual construction and repairs of high priority projects with the greatest benefit to cost ratio. A total of 150 water services were transferred from the rear to the front of the property. This Pilot Project serves as the model for the implementation of future projects of this nature. The draft procedures, protocols and project management tools prepared are being tested, adjusted, and refined in the field through this Pilot Project. These procedures include property owner's notification process and agreements, technical specifications I IP used in bidding, and compilation of a database tracking homeowners' E N G E N E E R t N G ROUP. C P.A. issues and concerns. A total of 160 water services are to be transferred. 48 Tab 2 . 1 Pro .oser Qualifications Similar Experience Public outreach, preliminary design, bidding, permitting, construction management and inspection services were provided. In addition, preliminary desktop "Condition Assessment" of identified properties under Phase I (48,406) using Geo-database tools to prioritize the implementation schedule for water service relocations has been completed. The total estimated Program cost is approximately $ 1.5 Billion. Our staff prepared a preliminary estimate of potential cost savings and other benefits resulting from the implementation of the "Small Water Mains Replacement Program" using readily available information. Major cost savings are being estimated by quantifying the following potential program benefits: • Reduction in water losses-water savings and conservation • Reduced operating costs-lower water production;manpower savings by avoiding reading rear alley meters • Lower maintenance costs-eliminate costly rear easement repairs • Reduced complaints-higher pressure, better quality, less lawsuits 1! 49 /,ii; t/, //./ //,///r//, :;: '.,'"44,A///70/,99/ ; : ,/,:.�i.tiN//i/�///i Hk//N//j i;/ % / //�/N/H, /,y, /N i ,, _ ✓./.,;:,/,.,,/::/,/.II// I/,..��/, ,;//40'794.,0---7,06,,.. ''i:r. r r:•-..:. ,,:. ,4,,,,i,,////„/1,.. /%,/„r/„H h/I //yL,/Vr:. „:.”Y v /'140:44*-"4” .c,x%r/x✓/N/ /'4,v„/ Cr/'#/fir7: rrn rx,.; ” ri g n /i//a r�j;/�r//i,1/�G/hrH� ,y/iv l / ,,,;;;,/, Comprehensive Lateral Investigation and Re.lacement CLIP :,',e•, • ,>_•-h.;w' - M,�� , y;'..;.»wte Y".tw.,bF yh`,. - yr rr.'.., wFo., ..h„,�,7..."'. •1f717, AW ',.,,,4 b w _ y ��.''Gr : / .., 1.' ;• ° a,•^?g"^ - < .• "_. rt'.►W, '� .t.4.,' p.4 r" a ti -4-'' rs .f a , I..,, g, � ,"ww ,^ r. � Nn ��i "r�a ', * , . . , , o , .o/ „,<;,,;',/i. � w Y<ayNdi .b �� 1.� kb, 4 w / J a , ;r� f 4,,,,,,,,,w„, ';ja ,°^a i °'„d .) .# y r { iillili ��% a ".”"^. ,.qw"y'e* ,,7' ;"* '!'.�»� ^, J daN * 's '*;•.:i S f a" y ' a � 914,\'59, �'':, � ._ ".;y':." +*:,mrx S7,....',:;.4.<4?:..-..' .,:;.4. ?y,"pa/ 7 #;" it.:'------/ `�`---- r '. ». .w ,_ a , ,''. b i"' A' ;"..., ;iw { . sy q. j�.�`y4 , a. ' _ o.y"�m yg t4+''0\ x.�;{ rr:\ civ3" � y; v w.L'. ,1� ......),:\t' *b 11� ; � u " ' - ' " ----4,,..,:'"V,,t,,---.. .,•,1*,,t,—*A". _44. '•, ' i-,---:— - ' •It+. ' ' 4-4"--#/ 'fr:" ,, * ' : ---, .:*. 'it,,,..,s.- .... . / , s .:. ";b w �. /:'. '. . �..,�., a•,,..�'''t,tyM .q'. 'p.rae.',"w8' g :$ �'+.t_ - ."E;"msss - ''- `., -. `►.a .� ..,•, ..., ' v F"�•,,gym, ,i''' ., r ...-''.'•;„-,,,,," i f -'ti ° ,? r�' m,.'��..-.F f�: ,, v. °� • ak'' `�+ It r.-d� ,y ly 'N.- „t4? +fes� ♦" , .vs # '"1 ,fs.' &"9.R...;.. ', ,. 4''''''''3:1A ' Cy*.r .r •' ..x.. '-..., r,r s' P te . r t • .M' '.j�p-� �y�-� +vow.. N,:r'N .•'� 1°.t. d`e ♦',v .Y• '" �. N• .'"�9i� i,�� .^A. , c. { t " •r .� "�'•°� - n ,'y„y', y .�...... ib'.. j• 1t �.Ye,. ' ,�}=' .:a�:�'":''}�'w e.'�^�,"�'.�� — �. /':.N,,�'i.r ,. «T^,Iy..' ♦r': .F•.. .jAJ.".: .� b :A "•b t -,1 }-�' 4�, ! A 'l. '°!• ry : h,N{ _ v. /. v, ,' .J.I bV ,� �..'" ".�:•,�•.:,'�. ill. '�' b N 4,» Nr,.. ,+.. X�; ,# -Tr>ti '4 t , :; r x � r-5' � � �•,., �} �of w ...w e , - V 'Y `Mwk �- , . //7 - -,-,i.;,;:.,e 1 i * k. y 1 qq , AY h , 1 t, 0 tx,, j /'"' Cr�"N f / a wa Key Similarities Start Date: 2004 Completed: 12/2007 Cost: $17M (Construction), $1M (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Evaluated the effectiveness of repairing public and private Systems laterals to reduce RDII, determine the associated costs to complete the necessary repairs, and identify any other issues that could impact • Wastewater Collection implementation of a County-wide lateral repair program Design Contact Information: Juan Bedoya • Corrosion Control and Reference Telephone Number: 305-254-5871 E-mail:juan.bedoya@miamidade.gov Remediation • Water and Wastewater *Professional experience of Franklin A.Torrealba, PE Master Planning Project Descption: • Construction 300 Engineering staff was selected to provide Program Management Management services for the$17,000,000 pilot program.As a result of a Consent Decree En ineerin Studies with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the Miami-Dade • g g Water and Sewer Department (WASD) initiated a program to reduce • Cost Estimating / the amount of sewer overflows resulting from infiltration, exfiltration, I Scheduling and inflow (I/E/I) within their system. To date, the entire mainline sewer network has been inspected and rehabilitated resulting in a significant reduction of I/E/I. WASD continues routine inspections and maintenance of the mainline sewer system. During major rainfall events however, Rain Dependent Infiltration and Inflow(RDII) continues to enter the sewer system causing excessive peak flows and occasional sewer overflows, resulting in significant operational difficulties to convey, treat and dispose of the wastewater. To better determine how to best address the peak flows, the WASD developed the Comprehensive Lateral Investigation Program (CLIP) to evaluate the effectiveness of repairing public and private laterals to reduce RDII, determine the associated costs to complete the necessary repairs, and identify any other issues that could impact implementation of a County-wide lateral repair program. Concurrently, WASD and others are working to determine associated costs to expand existing treatment, and disposal infrastructure and review by-pass alternatives to treat peak flows. Collectively, this information was used with the results from the CLIP, Systems Optimizations, and Flood Control Programs to develop a plan (by CAll IP others) to mitigate the peak flows within Miami-Dade County. ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. 50 2 . 1 e ,, - - - , , - Pro Pro .oser Qualifications Similar Experience With the expectation of large population growth in Miami-Dade County over the next 20 years, the issue of excessive peak flows has become more critical, impacting the performance of the pump stations and the complete sewer network. The result of the CLIP pilot study is to quantify the percentage of peak flow reduction that may be achieved by repairing laterals. Further, by reducing the flow at the source, the costs of transmission, treatment, and disposal will also be reduced and these results will be quantified for future solutions. The results of the CLIP must be considered in any future projections for accommodating the increasing population. 300 Engineering staff provided contract management to perform planning, engineering, cost estimating, inspections, coordination with construction managers, administrative, contractor invoicing, work issuances, document control, staffing resources, scheduling, public outreach, permitting, and construction activities. The company evaluated the effectiveness and costs of repairing public and private sewer laterals to reduce wastewater peak flows during rain events. From the 52 basins selected, a total of 6,972 work orders were issued r X�1111' ,: Lir�`�'M. w• .. ,a c7,-, "' . ":-.A.: "i'' ' l i . v ' „1"' — '''..,,, It . . .4,,,,,,s , .4_ 4 \ , . "'"1•;"— ' ° w 1 i t< n: ^� a+.,~x .9e".attxx+mzc�t»naq,,.,�,y';„Y,c'Puwv.•"w,. _ • id a 'Ye.N •�' ye�'"�kn�';rP.�y.s ,w.w�,+ '`�` 'M , � f 17 ale _ 'y a F��..,�. . 1r v, ,y W 1 �•"wMa'"S''' u:eali wt�a?;s wt ..•XpQ:l,.—e .�✓' ",.:y�' .,�aF'` AM'... vi $ .-,:,;,',1,,,,..iS r aw'MB`A:`,`.*: M M f 6 \ 471 WU M \ , 5,M` v M ' w� ,c; ',,„;,','"4„.z. µ1 7u.''" ''',"1:',:'' ,, s M 3 w "+�"Nq�gyD,o s _ SYN u"�y:R Y�a py/////y/��u�////��/N� g,«Fx s 4� !//„/! n CAUTION �,� M .,': i' i Al CAUTION CA .. - f ti' ...,,,,..4::::-.i..fl. .---.71..T— iliONSEIF7 • tq v”�..b ,� ' ,r:'' ,.,. •�. ..',te, :. e.:, y x IIII ,r ii ' 9 API 17/''' {m' 47'/';', a/ryy� y % k'z �i//17 i; ON wr/> H„rr y�///��//,� iv/r//llj/ hy�/�i/,;;i` 1'/d / Tf //�//,• i,,rrr%��r/H�r�/��tii/ /„N/j/s r �/r/%%�///i© r ��i/9/r��'/ \ .. p, / i'":11/////4*/.////'/#6,'////1/4i41/,,,,, '*' - / ' ,gyp ' t rp d MAli C'. u v�'P ., s , ,,, . P \V.. Yy1 W5^.. L 4 i. ifit m; .Iw, •� ° ,.. •, 'ad's •..x:. ,N� .;'; ;cpa, ;:. a ' a0 z h., w • • w 51 ' ''',/, / , ,,,/,, , it4f)/, ,,„/, City of CWastewater Infrastructure Geographic Information System (GIS) Updates , .,,,,.. ,-w-----".. ilr'— "'"" "ai"""*"' MIJ .•; } •�� ' L ' II d, q .... „ 2' 'I �r NY. J f i ' * ; 'or . . t \ - , , ., ''I * _ 100 ,'t.,P.,.., ;1 A : s. Y.yM PI - .. :: .:...¢�.:„..,'k.,�ae.:.� � �b' � '' :i'A'moi,, / w\\��a a _..._� ... �►w.�:, `�•x. aka N^ 1 I rt. p[. 4 IWG�: iR a 1, p'' ' ' :It : :' I 2 N ''. ', 'n a t.,, /4 N\ 3 a k it I III i a yp' xw Ili �7i„ ' a — - I . t n� Ny i F n T ', ,. 7.. . ppp ��p ilk, 33 ,. . - 4 * , i,.. 11.11. ME '....— 1 , - 1 ae. - ''1141"..-''' _Lstasid.OWM:' ' .,11- '" -. AAANNN"'"' ao c4 1111E '° a axe t ' 4 ''''''' ',0'... 4' Al , - :ii, ..—.::-1 1 : \,e,, r,..,,,,,,,,,Ns, ,,,, ,,,,:,14,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,s.„3,,,,,, . ; , dm5.7,,31‘$1.1;4„...., ' c - L. "--------,---- .. , , -N, wMy 3 ! ,yyix�M# .y�pyw,;a y:d, -qx. h H n Key Similarities Start Date: 06/2016 Completed: 10/2016 Cost: $60K (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: GIS, Project Management, Wastewater As-built review, site Systems visits, assets inventory Contact Information: Jorge Acevedo PE, ENV SP, LEED Green Associate • Wastewater Pump/Lift Reference Telephone Number: 305-460-5006 Stations Email: JAcevedo2@coralgables.com • Engineering Studies Project Description: The City of Coral Gables(City)owns,maintains,and operates a wastewater system comprised of thirty-four (34) pump stations, over 65 miles of gravity sewer, and 25 miles of force mains. Recently, the City developed a GIS Database containing wastewater assets, such as pump stations, gravity mains and force mains which was then divided into sections named the Sewer Atlas Sheets. The current GIS Database includes only assets owned by the City and does not depict Outside Sewer Connections (OSC) or Private Pump Stations discharging into the City's gravity system and force main system. In order to maintain an accurate record of this private infrastructure, the City has requested 300 Engineering to provide engineering and GIS record services to incorporate these assets into the City's Wastewater GIS Database. 300 Engineering collected as-builts, design drawings, city resolutions atlas sheets and additional relevant information that were relevant to identify how this OSC are connected to the city's wastewater system. After the information was collected and analyzed the following attributes were incorporated into the City's GIS Database: • Pipeline diameter • Pipeline Material • Resolution Number • Date of Construction or resolution approved • Private pump station (Yes/No) • Location ENGIN EKING GROUP, P.A. In addition, 300 Engineering completed field verification to confirm the 52 o Ta b 2 1 r' , • Pro .oser Qualificafions Similar Experience existence of the outside sewer connections when there was not billing records available. These field verifications consisted of above-ground visual inspection only and were documents with pictures which were also uploaded to the GIS Database and linked to each respective OSC. To better record the work performed, 300 Engineering prepared a summary table in Microsoft Excel containing the seventy-five (75) digitized OSC as well as the assigned attributes. On a separate subtask, 300 Engineering gathered available data from the Miami Dade County Department of Regulatory Economic Resources (MD-RER) related to the PVTs in Miami Dade County. Using available GIS data from the City and MD-RER, 300 Engineering performed a query to determine which PVTs fell within the City's boundaries. Forty-four (44) PVTs were digitized into the City's GIS database and assigned the Permit (PSO) Number. r w' • ..;4"{�: , 7: 1:::k,.. 40, . ..,..1,11t....' ,..."...1,, ....i -71-.e..-:-,..0y,.., n. . . �../ NA M� aeM. .- � 4.- 'y � �. e �:;' bA� " T w a 7 w ,, x 0 ! *. h PoawMW �"b t W el93::***".:.. " y` Y ,40 L. � 11. R Y. " ..,04 . RP t � .w . w^ . :. n,..., M ` 4 P. #. i. I, - , * -.94 — . ' .s,- —.4 *:,,.,*-4‘ iiii - 4.0.,11. 4'"A i*" . . 11` "* ' ' ' * * i 4 AA ".... *,..,; ilt v7 ..1'"*t 0 6 1 t* . tut% * 'a. *id A ,,, . "'—01 r'4� pww r w � � ' � r . I:* lk 4* 1$'''' "/ ' ' � • e �i ' 0., 4� M :44 '9"�� *�«. - a.wtIWLA.:1111Vit -, . ,, . , aa ,.�a,ela ' 1::‘,..,, rS:' i :. Iii ,, . st,, , • i �-t*: "' - � ; � '� „�.�w � �".w�� .� ��ra �. t0 "�� k ", "u � `* �4 0 � $A a "r,sw.l ,�+ Vi �1... ; " Vi, ►, r , ' ' • � � ? a' "wwa � 6 "" !Si; �" � 4 Art ,7, � 0.e' " :% 9iu , . aApw» a 0 �60�. 1 " I. ',w' "RM'+•^A "..y. re ^ a _ gi , 'yint - I,' a. 1'' *y ,: : „ « ,.,„ r 4‘40,,,,,,,,,� i. 4 isillt,,, A. .': M'' s w N*r' p ,d�, w : ,.., Or - \ ,, ry`gl I. '4,\,,,,..., .11;4'. ail7 y. Via...Wr'�. 4 x. ...+r-I' r~Ir -r 4 $., r„� . .." ,� ;y, AP "4 '�'. n' , ..... , „ .,..,,, ..„.,,,' ,,,,,, ,)1, . ,J, k-, , . * , 1W., 14) ,..*....\,' ., #0,„1.1, , r 'it Y 44101i * 4 •, s*: .'* . ' r 1,:,,,,,/V I it, .. I - . , 4.., ifr ''''::: '''''''''':"Ilfr4d3f,,,,' 'ek 7' '*\.., .ce. y ? 1,,,*..7 T 1 ........8,c:.. ,.. .".�,..:, ...:. '""'°:::.; Mme' .' a. r 'f r.'- ? ' 7 .:3....* 9.',,w • dt 7.3 *N :,* M s w"0. ,,,"'AAA^^^ �':,/, •vy . .,r4.,,,^.' !�. � r x : '�, ':r: � .ir /n.•., y. � Y.' ,,:ly �9 '�?/:•n^A,I�"'Ty(A ��1 _.. •y, Y � � j �..y�tl• y Ips,' 41, ir&E,.. ..ik, .i ,&..., on ,,-- : .44114- -, :.4."*.i„;41,7 -'1,4,7'7,47.271"-, 70,,:°"71,,,x,;12,„i 4": ' :t r* '10,.;,, 411444****, 'lir n , ti s . M ♦. ./ .. „ + .r Zx,, a. .4$1 i .. Ili it,. .«tk°'a ,. �, .1M.►"•,11�" •may. :;_ M'•. •'f ,, br . '1 ili 7ft L r 1 ::,,,,ed.116*;:e'..511trilt 4PM,: 4,,,, !4.,, :,,,4, ,,,i_„4.,..C...,,,,,,.,,,,,,..........H 2 't ".:11::,,J.3%.2...,:: al:.: ei i .-* i� � ewe.4.1.. i ,�„,�r ,. " .44t r' �y \ .. & « ," .. ;.:%.. ,,, &r M? �, D in'' 4!A 1 *,,�I «Ir' :,,,, r 1 4. 'r. ,w a ,,4 top$.* ate' ,.. 4. ;`" la 1 .. ♦ S ,,,a. s 0. .a.? ;6,* '''.'+' 1 V V.,.1',,,.° 'ya ,„,\"'"?. . � s ' "�'�'... �� "�'"�., 1.f ,,,- , '�,,,i'., '�i'� -* "til►'�r�+ � �.�,+ a' . , ;-, ',. t..*. i.. n , Y W M Y...w.,11 '. '4. . ),„* „T' • 0; A>* k 1 * '�a "�1� v, ,,,,err "`�s.,r'w, , ' *'I' '4‘."."' *--.-'7.- i- i'llt i ' 1 * Ilt*IPS1"4:'.7 meta iw,1 ''''* s' ' ''S' ,i : " t .', , .0 '*lr°:, .4:*4, . .,,' y, ,fie, tlf 53 ..,.Mw.,•.,......,7;10-;,7)4/4.;//////%%/' p yy4'x...a..._.<.r..:..:.,.,..,\.... •./!Nf: / ,v. .:"::.'...Y......... . ( a,;,./;../..,..n.....r.1 z.,r,,.rv...c,,r../(F:,mm..•. �r..n,.,.,,...r.., .,r Y?r. y5>.,Sv..W. .... ..... t, , r ///'4,/s',,,,, ''',$11V477,40/ �, 4,�� ., N '�4p %/ � �V /.! ,if" , r i.„( e)//'"/ 4I ✓iyr! »r,. (• .:s Y4 M a.::ar/. i/3',c?4.:'v/p / ,lr..,'n:'-Nd'/xi ,''/N/ 7�Hti;>// G✓, / y i x'^:w,zd y I 0/0/110;/4.4, ; /F..,,/,rr%�%iH/yrr ti / „//HJ"r.../4yI I / /,./4/ %/77, GIS Utility Backlog 4 Miami-Dade Count „,„ „, , fr: Z Key Similarities Start Date: 08/2014 Completed: On-Going Cost: $10M (Engineering Fee) Waster Distribution System Firm's Role: Eliminate the existing GIS Backlog of over 1,800 As-builts and • Wastewater Collection 2,000 AASIS tickets,or corrections to their GIS, by June 2017 as per the 2013 System Miami-Dade Consent Decree. • Water Pumping Stations Contact Information: Jose L. Lopez • Wastewater Pumping/Lift Reference Telephone Number: 786-552-8334 Stations Email: JLL©miamidade.gov • Engineering Studies • Cost Estimating/ * Professional Experience of Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD, BCEE, Scheduling D.WRE, PMP, F.ASCE Project Description: 300 Engineering was selected by Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) to provide assistance with the digitization and correction of as-built records of water and wastewater infra-structure and incorporating them to the County's Geographic Information System (GIS). This type of work required specialized and qualified personnel with the required training and experience to evaluate and interpret information related to water and wastewater as-builts, perform research, and to be able to enter, manipulate, edit, and update WAS D's GIS databases. WASD had a backlog of over 1,800 As-built Plans and over 2,000 Active As-built Supplemental Information System (AASIS) tickets, or corrections to their GIS, which needed to be digitized in GIS by June 6, 2017 as per the 2013 Miami-Dade Consent Decree. 300 Engineering is a sub-consultant providing staff augmentation services for this 30+staff project. The Scope of this project included the research and correction of reported problems in the GIS databases of Countywide Water and Sewer Infrastructure, populating several County's asset management systems, such as Infor EAM. Also, this project included the assessment of the ex- isting GIS digitization process, provide recommendations to the County, ak and implement agreed upon optimized process. ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. I 54 "Tab 1 2 . 1 „ .,,, •osorQualifications SimilarExperience The GIS Backlog Team is also responsible for generating GIS Drafter Analysis Reports for tracking performance purposes, and Overall Backlog/AASIS Reports. Such reports are produced in a bi-weekly, monthly and quarterly basis. , ' ,— _.......... _ ,. ;4.w... .„i x '11 1 _,.. :....... ..OM1 \'—' - 1/7— / A ."*"..'''' .'.:., , N —. '''''''—" +t--- ----.Ji ...7;--'.--""' I .2 riw rN0'�, 'i . . i . 4 F y +r5 M �a '• u _ �,..-�.o,«.-M.. f'.,..iL.._i..1.-.�. ....;,,r..�.r,.. i----1 , , *�""YCf': '•a . "ti111,FriSYS.7; .... ........ ........._ "�':"R .. iu ;, I I:: P a r .wW...../, ..s"^.•.wih �•'Wi �°/�' ,'`� � ��...'�M ,....,,,244;,;:.,,,„:Mrowx°1�!" G 1 VSs U*AjUlaViip4NANi10061.\l' 9 ,:.;11, ,,,,N i r �/r1.; j 9 h a,,� .y,.:'AM'"'"M"a.,,.1""• »'Yw„�""",y'M�� ` 4 �.,.... .� ANN, ^.,,� 40,'' ' "r.' ' ' ' '''1 {1 U .) '-, ,,,„_, ,,,,....,,,_:),,,_ . f , 1 . 'ft i-,,.1 . " -'-',,L _.:.--', • r .s_ ryr. :..:.. .....1 ; P ; I i i IA,,,, yy `(�(y(t7, 4 i 1 ," • , , , ,,.➢Xn""r' .6 d ,»',`...:.i sM': yy A� .., � It..,-,1,,,,,,V,;„.'.. r.lyw .yy..� y.,.. M _or, :iiiire .______,' ,....4...piiii........________________ .. ..,..,.. -N-------1, ___ ,. ____ / 7 1, --s,,,,* 1— —I , 'Li i -,,,-1,„.„- ,,, .,..';'-:-_, ,,,,,,,,,,: :;., ,,,„,„,„,„witic,, 1 I I i , I,.=— . '...„---::::,,,, ... .._........_,. .„,.. .•.«<..'.�.xx.w.tukd i i/,'':.,x,r,, <.;;. :, ,..�+v....:n............�:w« ...:,...., s .,.. .y� ..Y•�� t"{"' ", : - ..._ ---1. -.- . -...:, ,- : :4.,,;1. , 1111411111114111 -— 7 P .0', ' Si;., ' %..*,, 4 : : -: ' ' . ,-• -.• : -...sot.);;;, :' " II Jo "Asolk,40416i' ANAlia . 7,... ,. , A A. A A,. a. .A. AL i. fir, ,*r". -....e___.-- --- V —.7,r 11 • /11111111.111.1111141 . . tLrl .0..42,,v , „..t th. • OM ,....., 7 04 .i....„.07,- ; ( I t .tri:-.: ....: ; 4,, ' . : :,'. \ i ♦ ^s a a joi II tali ' • i' 11!' 55 ..m...,.,. . """7,77, , ronmY ,..bY//x,.,i.u.:•i,N�w r,/.... . am.G..m: a ,,,, r..,//w:;/3:/4t' J, i 11 • + 1 "� F. .4'" , 4 !,/ / : . �.Y , , , ...,,., ,.. rwi b/!/Ld'/„ /h /// / ,,, South Heights Water Main Replacement and �,r,= {,,,, MeterConversions ui ea ar a e x _ ,;., ,c„,,,,, "de. ,• : ' w W ` � ,, ,,,,##;40,,,,;„,:, , x ri* • V. , ; 1 w, . .may ,., e\ . -d z' r ma . y W* *It dMMe '",Y.*,,,At,'',. PN� �xe\w �� lc- ''*: '04!''''' " V§. � ^. �,- A. & o � '.g�"wy1v, ;. • "'! '1r , C'M?'y'`°""',M 'C. '\R. p '"5 .R ''''' r''m. 'ir' y % I aw me ""&W ,� � "° \ Pl " . w pyJ 4 A?,( y H . /, .n • 1,4 y. --„ T h '�v ' lm f § � * rrn� , 'f ,,,----;—,4,0-30.1.--,'lr— ..:1,...3:* 1. 2 y� + r may,~ ,a ' —'''''.1t:— -'AO AN— ' . b. „it' '.$14'.WIkti44)1". -' A ' ' , , Key Similarities Start Date: 06/2014 Completed: 10/2014 Cost: $48M (Construction), $45K (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Utility Coordination , As-built Review, Cadastral Support, Systems Quantities Take-off, Cost Estimate, Field Observations, Limited Permitting, Scheduling • Wastewater Pump/Lift Contact Information: Jose F. Soto Stations Reference Telephone Number: 786-268-5270 • Corrosion Control and Email: JFSOTOI©MIAMIDADE.GOV Remediation • Construction Project Description: Marra gement 300 Engineering assisted the Department with the preparation of the D/B g Criteria Package for the replacement of outdated and deteriorated • Cost Estimating/ water mains in the South Miami Heights area, bounded by SW 168th St & Scheduling SW 191st Ter and SW 127th Ave & SW 113th Ave. The overall project was divided into two (2) Phases, with SW 184th St acting as the horizontal limit separating the two phases. 300 Engineering was required to deliver two (2) sets of design build criteria packages, one for each phase. 300 Engineering performed a GIS and as-built analysis to classify and determine the water mains that require replacement based on a criterion previously discussed with WASD.This criterion took into account important factors that are affecting the water quality and distribution in South Miami Heights such as material, pipeline age and pipeline size. The WASD also required that all water meters are installed/relocated to the front of the properties, where the majority of existing homes are fed through a water main in the back. The Lineal Footage of small water main replacement for the overall project is 149,807 LF. A total of 2,800 water meters are to be installed within the overall project. Moreover, 1,943 of these meters are to be relocated from the rear to the front of the property. 300 Engineering also assisted the WASD through the procurement process. The following subtasks were performed and delivered to WASD for both Phases of the overall project: utility coordination, as-built review, quantities take-off verification, Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC), fieldobservation support services, limited permitting services, and overall project scheduling. CA ENGINEERING GROUP P.A. W 56 pi 7,..‘„,...:IT,4,..,:::,,,,,w,..,.., t • ,„ ' lab 2 • 1 , pro •oser Qualifications. Similar Experience „. ......,..-.„.,.,..-7: ...,. . . ...,:„..,,,,,,:,,,:te,47,7f1::,7,:,,,,r4,,,;:,4,:,:„•,...,--,.....:.,,,,...,.;.,....., , , ...„ .., ,...,.. 4.,,......„,......„,:,,,...„.,4,!....,....,....„...„,.4.'N'.q.',0i';il.;>$,,,,,..,.4,,t44-,,„...,xi,/,'''‘..'7,..,,,,, ' •,•... 1'''''''''''''''''' „. .,,„,.... „ .•,',r..,,'• ,..'“,,. , \\"' ......, ,.. '.. ...... - 4 *":':' . , ..,,,.,...,7 • '' '''*'"'','...."'''',,,... 4.. - 0 ''''',.•'''''- . . , „. ., ..., • • • ,,,• ,., •,,„„ '.:',.. of:,' ....,..,.../'''''''!'''':'• "..:'''''''' t''...,:".,.... ' ,.,'.,, .,..,,,'"'A k-ii'.'....3';‘,.',,;(,;:- ',.-.....,........!..:.:,.......":„...,„,,..:,,i...,,,,,,..•„..,;.,,....,,-,;-.,:::: f*Aili y 4 ':, ...,Soi...-,,,_.".• ••,...1 '‘,,,,,,I1/4:. -- - '''''..,•',--:' t'„,i,';''''IN-.7,,,';74'1,,i-7!.- d-''''ft..--,-- . t*'4.110,,..t.,4,-,„ ,,, 4.„. — „.., .• ::- ....4.-,i's-: f!' '-'...',..:",..,-.-., -.-.,, • i*,'.-.',fiii,,..-.,_•- . -,-. -.. ••,,, - A 4 ., ' --.;. ,,,,,..'„•,,,.....!.2,,,''.,,,.."-'.....,,.. . ..-,..'''',.4.-41t,,it • ,, ,,,,,,, , liflel'ag: ..vr I - - - . -.. :., ,_ , .,_ . , - , -,,,..- ,.,-- -, -. , , ,.,..,.., ,?..,-..4,,,,,,,;,,..i.. ,,,,. ....,., ..., ...,,,i •-.'"''' .'""'.‘.."-:- 411*--z- Niii- 0- ,...., _ ,. . ,. , „. :-., , .. -,.,,..,,. ,. ..10,'Itite—...i ... ........-- - ... , - - ^ .. ........„.,,.. ,,, ., ...„, , .... ..... .::,- : ...1... 1 f. . 4P"..'4*. "....i':':::---------'... '''' .,...7. '•*- • i• '.-..,..„,„..,...„„,,,,,..•••••-i.„----.-,,...-,.•-• 1 ...i.....4. ;....... ,...i:t.,r,j,;t..,.,:..,..----.. ,,, ..,.„ ..„. . ,....-----. -I ...:„-•,-.,„.• '.r.,•• z..,-*,... '- '''''',,','-‘....,.. "r", il.,17; .„7,.,,,,,T,.c...,t.,..,$.:•s , - ... ....::.,.., ...r.......7... , .‘-,......: .'..- .... ,. - , ' ......-...,-..t.',...t. ,',.i....i 4,. .'.-..- .-.,..,.... .4:•1 +,. . ,,,„.:,/„;40, ..,,.',....".. :".'.'..'......4.:."....',;;-.:..1•.:1!., „,„- •i'.1-7..„.,:,. ',....,?..it,,,...,.: 4."•.,,...'...":"1..: ''..4***t a''''' 7*":"'„'''''' 0.."......-.."...,..'',..:•,e,4,,,...'i...::.. ' ','"'"" . ....,,.. '''',,,,,,,,..,,'.;0,....',i'i".. '. 0:4: , Ili it. • . . • •- ,,s. •1111 • . , .:t.... ,....,,,,..,,,,.•>,,,,,....;• .4,,,..,.......,,,.,;. ...""',...,...4*,1,,, '4. *4 1......, .•••' 4"",,...•,4',,,,,,,,.....7.,,..-,,,,,,* '.:'...',:'''''..,...,:,..„.,'.;......;'':1'1:1'..i'''''':'''llti-'-:''''''..:b.',,.,,„,,.:.s':*.''.'-........',''.::.',':.'''•':'''''':::::'..7'.......,:*...",..,'7.:...-'"...:.......'.441:';',,,'...'...:...''...,-1,::..: ---'...,..„,‘'.:,...—,., . ,•,.1*':,,,,,,„;.....,'...,..,-.';'4,41"':"HP'Pip,',..„..,-'s'it..'.-.,.'..,..:,!:. . . q;. ,.... : -• ..... .., 1 , ... . .40%-t, ..,..,. ...t...1. .., , ,,...,.1............„ -. zo''''''''',* - '* t,' . ' •,..,'.,,,i ' '''', ' , ,,,...i. ,, „.,... ...TA...ilk... , .,,.. •.„? .„..,,- ,.......,.„. „... •. .. . .,,...:,....,1,. ...„.,.. .... „.,„,:•.. •........... . . . .. ..t. , „.t..,' ' .: . .,• s.„.‘.,.,..,. . ., ...-.. ... , ..,,.....: ... . ,E,.. .. ...•1 .,..,:,, ‘..,:..,,..,,,,....,.::;,,,,,,...,..,....,....:,,,......:„..„..:,..1::;i....,:..t.,.....„...,,,,,,,...,. ,....7;....„......,,,,,,..,,.......„...,‘,,...,,,...,.,. ,:,,,..:,.,,10,...:, :,..,,,.,,, .......,...,.. .,..7.,,,,....,..,:„..,.;..........774,.. .......„. • # .‘ • - , ,. . .., 4,41,,,_„, ., ..,.,.......w., ..,.....: ..,,1 , , , ,,,, - ,, .";',1.,....;'...":";-,7:;...:,-,:r.... ,:-:‘,,,2, .....;;77, t..,..., . ::.‘.'4,,, ',,••• , ..../'..„.4, , . :4...:,,,::::.-..• 4.,:",*.t.1".:. '',.• ',4*,:71., *0,,,,„.. ' ., .,,,„ .. ..„. A. , .,,, e ' '''''!!..*4..4;*",/,..''''''....• '. 4'1'.1.,;,:i7.:!."Z.T,..'4': , .., :.S.. -4,. „., .:,.„. t..,, . '..,,,,....:,e':''.!,.r .,,':',.''.',... .:„..:i• 4.... SS - _...„,... 4-1.- 4, ',4C4 !'"..:..."'.....,,,.;4.-,... ,,,,.......4..,-. .•-,...... fr''.,.".,.1.,°' '..-".,. •:,.............',...,..;.„" li.: .,,,,. ...'r‘ '.i. ' 14k: -..777., .. : --7,...44..'..::...,...7..,....',....1,.:.H,..",. .••••"."',..•,;,''.,,, . i.,'.7.1k .;,; ......!....\,::',....,"..,.,....4, •„:1 '',.,,,:. ''''' '',',' ,,,,,,.....,...‘,........,„.........„.,.. ..,..du.........#:.T.•,,-,,,,:-....,,...'...„....„--..„-.• •...., .•‘..,... ......,,,,,.., ...;,...,..., -,,,,,,,,, ‘:.,'.- ,,,..•• .. „.,. ' .,.,,.. '4114' -,...„.:ir..-..i.-....;'1'...-.',.•..",„.. ... ...:,,,,...•...„.7•,,,*-'•-•...‘.-;.•••-••; .•••-• ,,.......-:.•,;....,'.:::.. :•••.....„..‘,..,...„. ....,,,,.:..,.,....,,..., .. „... .... , t ,,,.....,••.,•'.,...it?' ',it...4„..• ..,..,• . .‘..---„, ..•..-b.... ,....*.,„:„ ,..,,, ....,,,,••••...;.. . . „„ . ..:;;;•;.r.':.: '' :7.::::'.':::.,,:.;.':'...';',...;:::(.1:',';';',;7!:',"';'.'....::::'..'.,:':::::...-•':',1':•••',.-"'s,,„7,.,.".''''— .,,„,,,,,,,,,,, " ' ',417"."' ..,'(''''. : ''''''"--i'll•-.4i,,..4 •1'2: '4,i''''''O's'1"' .r.,...4:8*"'"'';.*17:;.."':,...:'. '''.''',.. ;:'.;',.„, *.....,.,'!'. ...i.'.,,1,,...,.4,..;',,...,,,,,*:,1....,,.1.....,....., .........,.„.., ..,:. ,,.... . ... .... ., , , ,, '..:/.14 .1!,:1,1i1li:!..4.,' ''''''../"./..''''''...:' '''''"....k. ....'oe':. *.'''...',',......'''''.-.;'...":-1.,''''' l'...-:*: . - . ... • 2 ' , ,..,.''',, , ':4,..'17-.'„,,..,Z.:14,Z..4,..•'. 4 4' , iiiiiifirnt41: **e.'...;*-;**,„'Iii,•44:.i,i,,,,,,;,,,,,..,;*,....,,,,..,t,10*...4,.,...:: , ., ,,, , ...,........ . . ,. "',",rtitT7:: ':".:•-•,' ....''ii'":- - 1";., '''''')'',''''.;'''..,......**,,:.: .i....:7,:,..',.• :.,..;74. ''7a1r..,;'!:':t".....:..'1'.................'''''',.....4%*. •. ....,''',:*,.',4' ...:**;:: ...' ,',.'...''.. - . ..40,4,'. ',..,.‘4',.*44,,,A.„,:...:;.•••••••••••.-..•..c,..•'.,4'.4t.,;./0 .......,-.....i..,.....,„ , ......,.• ..,....,,,,.. ...., .,,•,•4•..s.,,,....,,,,„,....,........,,,,..,... ,.,.. ., •••..- „.„„,. ,,,....,.•,,,-........,,,....•..-......, •••••,.. -• ..‘..... ,,,,........„, ••••-,t-.•,.,...,,,,,..-, ,,,--Ji'• .;"..P...-. -....:.:77.-:. .r -. ...-.,.,,....,•••.,••t..... :.,.,,...,... ...,,......!,....,:„,.......:7..,.,...• .,. .'-;.-- ‘„.4. ,.. . 4 ,,.... „...., ..1.'",'"#,'... ,#,.;.- .::,, ''.;...,',.',...........:*.';',.,i.'.:...'.** ...77.7,7*.!‘.:.:. - ....; ."., ...;,-...'..ttl.1;.:.....:;'.:•:,..... ,i,....A.: 40.. ,! ''' . '....',.: ' ;•!!',,.....H....H.'.. '', 'i.•'.1.".0;;',..t*:*' ''t...,";',..=;..,.....1,0'..;.„,‘." ::* :7.,..,;.*:...; ..1,',. , .',,,,' ,- -....,...•..''',„ ,.-,;',,i4,,gt, :4,:- :.4.* ,"' ."-47.,....';....?•....,*4....„'., ....•....;., . ,... ,,,...,. ..,,,,,,,.., ,, l''..• ,,..,1..:....--:::„:,:::. ',...4,i•„...g.,,....,:ol. •1.-..1...,.... .......„. .,.,....„.„. ,'.. "..*- ,..• .,.,....„ , ,'.0.,..ix*, ,, ..,'::.'":".'.../.".-AIN67....,,,,..''''.' .,,,, •,....... ..., ';"..-.,,,'.,'...•'..,-*.,-,;:4,,, .,•..,. , 4.0.,.."..' :.''...‘..... ,",401104"....''.. , ....,, , ....,,,,..„.....,.., t,•,,,.1.0 44.44,0.....,.- „*.........0, ,...:.,- — : , 400!•:'''. •''''";•i.4;,,, „..i.., .4 , ,:., „.,, .,it,,„,40.,....,,,.....,„...:,,,,,. .a..•,,,-.1,t,....:.0 1 ..stit ..,.:,7,,,,.....,,,..,,••••;',...,..,,!,.'.„ ',.., ,,,.....,..',...•..,P3ii,,,..,,. , .,;,;„•,....,,.. .„.......,:.••••• ''.'"',.., 1,4#.••:•.' '''''' ,',.,4,4..• t*„,!1.!•„;',,!..:!.."4:4'4'' .'.' '.1.:*: .,...... , .....:, 4 ..,,,,0'9,,, 20i• '..., :.,. .:•:.•1' -...., ...., , . "".•:.""'...***-'''V —'.1'.•,'''-.. .,"7.'....4.,.,.s,..7 1,''''.. ,...",.!.."•.„,. -..:,,. . •::•.:' ,, .a. *5 7.,.:44,4....,,,,,t.' ... . .,%..;,..4.',,.,:-.'i,:,....":.:.,.„....:".',..,:,,,.. .4.,,,...,' - „.,..,. . i,•:',,. ,..;„,',.,:1%,,:::::...,:-. ,-........-....,....,... .'. -:"-:'"''''-•.--.-,."7-40t.---*.."''''i;*-:=7,-, ,4 7„:„..::,,,,, ,,,,,.**: -: ..,, -,......tff.....,,,,,,,44',..e.•,.:.,.:.•‘fr''.-....;,„ :......:.:.:•-•...,........,..,.... , ., t...,„„„,...,.,,,,..„:„...,...„.„,...,.....:„..:..:.,:::...•-i•4....,.........;.7:„....1,..".;;::::....„, „.'...4'... ,-...... ,..:,.,,A'.:p•-,..,,. z,.4's,.. '-',. '' ,iii,.:. --...°..."''',,,'..-. '- :7.?'i .' ,ii.s.,*:',41`:.,iHt.:.,',...,...,;.,,;,. •,,,,,,;,tfi. '7,..;,-*".,;',:-..,......'....!.7-••......'',..".444,44161,1i:'...i..... .'....,..:10::, ''''. ,..,_,... , ',..7),..:-,,,' ..'". ,, ...' * ; 440,.. ' T.,.....,.,1i'...:.... -,1..-.'..i.'72;..7 4',.... .,'',7;;,,,,... i.7.....* '*.' *4...,..'7 ,,....1 .. ...., 1,-,..! ,......'4.Y•. .,!.:...-..;!4..„.:: '. ...... ...,..... '''' ..•7'...',...'..*,4,14*!..,ii...,**4:::',',...'''.ii.,.:.....,,.....H1::..;,........1..nc..i:,7'.,.,,,'''',..' .....'''''';'.:,....?''ilftl; --,'..r,'f....:.....:.' ..,:',..'.'i'..,-,,: :::::,;,..'•,....,...4,..,*`:44%:" -4. .....„ .. 4....,.. ”.1.".4..4.4.144.‘..- :-.... ..........;4..... :-., ..7... :4,...„ -. -.. . ..:: ....,. . .........,,-...,. ,..,...,:,....,, -.. , -4,,,.4;.,...."..,....„.r.,'..7" . , ''..•,, '4,1.,!...,*.."*** ''''',.• '''.'‘:::**:**'..'.',.''....,":"'''''''..1 %,. ..„,i''''.'::_.'..•.'',#1.,7*.;,,, ..to)'''' 1...;'.': :;',...1:::;:-",,.,:.....l'. .; .'..- '''......''....... i.,...'.'';''''''''',',....4..,..•......,.; ., ,i; : '...:::: .,iiiiiie., .„ :,:ii .1 ,,..':,: -,;...!.;4:...,,.......:.;211.4t.t.: ,":,.,. tt ..'.,.,1,:.;.,.... .......- .1 ..... — .. . . - _ . . , -- ..,..,•.,. . , , ,. ... 57 14, 74,0 Miami-Dade Water an ewer Department Government . Desi.n-Build n , ,,, -. :..: • „ 4 ,.. + :e...',.,• r �' t7 °�' k M"' tl �� ,4,,:�v./ ...!#"A.. t 9.,. �a � d " ._,,,---- :\,/,:::: J}� Y +Y - .,,,,, } r" .,:,- ' r �P ` to ' 1:0111 , - . '- --4 sit. .A� .,. .".,.d v. .k j ,i y .z 9 r .r t a \ .;;h:Ptl,. . ,,- Orr 'f a', , ,,, a`. PP E , * _ _,...„ -, -,,„-,:i.:F.,,k, , \ --- -,-;-::.-f., :6, ' ...--. -- - a,--, 'jam r ...„--- , „..,„...-, . , . t . , .,,,,,,,,'.,,, , .., „.. , , . _4. - ,./,) , \-7 ii,A • - k„.-7 - ,.,., -7,_,_,,,,. - , N.,-- - - oil'\\, -4 ' .. I:— i 'r-'''. i. v 4. ,,,, -.),,,, , 1.4 �+ b c r, , af'\` r 1 v , , _ '.,,,- . .7.--__....,;-7,--,:i. ,..s.,,, M ,. , - , .i.,-'' ,,, ..., „ ,, _ , , - - ii. •, r . } 5r,,, 9 g y � w M • -'4';;:,.. ,. a Wy w "�;�,:.;.. a '.;y.'., ��.i 3 ,.' �.•�1 k e a ~ r. t Key Similarities Start Date: 04/2008 Completed: 09/2013 Cost: $55M (Construction), $1.6M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role:Program Management,data collection, (geotechnical,survey, • Wastewater Collection utility, coordination, alternative analysis, tunnel design and construction methodology), land acquisition, stake holder coordination, permitting, Systems and public involvement. a Water Distribution Design Contact Information: Victor Fernandez-Cuervo, PE • wastewater Collection Reference Telephone Number: 786-268-5310 E-mail: Victorfc@miamidade.gov Design • Water and Wastewater * Personal Experience of Franklin A.Torrealba, PE System Expansion Project Descption: • Engineering Studies The replacement of the 54-inch sanitary sewage force main (FM) from • Cost Estimating / Miami Beach to Virginia Key and replacement of a 20-inch water main between Port Island and Fisher Island.This project was required not only to Scheduling replace a deteriorated 54-Inch PCCP FM but also to lower the FM before the U.S Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) commenced the dredging of Government Cut to a depth of 50 feet. Replacement of the line was the only option considered. The Engineering Scope of Services for the FM Micro-Tunnel crossing of Government Cut option encompasses a replacement of a 54-Inch Force Main placed inside of a minimum diameter of 72-Inch Steel casing under the Government Cut. This FM was reconnected to an existing 54-Inch FM under the estate-owned waters south of Miami Beach and on the north end of Fisher Island. Relevant Services Performed by 300 Engineering personnel: • Project management • Project management • Engineering (geotechnical, survey, utility, coordination, alternative analysis, tunnel design, and construction methodology) • Scheduling and cost estimates • Stake holder coordination • Permitting, and public involvement programs associated with over 8000 linear feet of subaqueous crossings, with five shaft locations ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. impacting four islands. IP 58 ., .,,,,,,,...4„.„.,,,,.,,,..,..., Ta b 2 , 1 ., ,,, . .... Pro •oserQualifications Similar Experience .. $" 3�►.F ,,. ^huh a. "1 ."•a .. "-w. . .„...,.,,,,:., .. ....,, m.,mgrrcm. 0 x ,. • :A,• .r., ,:.:::, , f" �a � 3* yr+`.%w ? ti " ,-,42,,,,,,, .. ...,,,. ,: r- - r. 4 , A.,, 7r . ' , ,. .!,,,,,,„„A,..„ .„. 4 , ( br , y4M ,4,.. � :� 4 414 'r:'.'..'.'.,. '41,' - 114,,f.,'••'',;;'.•'' ....''''''''-: ..... ..*- ..,4%.,. ", } .e �(A .ar w. i tl'r Wr � ... ,Ira A j 6!'- :.v ..'!per ( t ^a�.,1 '"ir+,�W' t:./ F�O .. 1, - 'W+ .� • 4 ryfrf( '..girt ` A, s>�.: ap`. �i J --''...s.'i...:.'-. ._-,,...,1....,,R;..., w..,,• . * �, / ,.�.' • ' y �,�MI .nom vii +,` r 1 SCS" �/.y. • .., ,.,... r .,...,,...;:,,,„ -,..„,,,„,..,...,...,. . jj // J . ,, , - ..,:',..,1--., - ' , 1* ,,,iii.,,,,,, ,1,'.,..,,,z. ,. ,,_.„.„..,,,. ,... , .,,,,,,.-.,c,.....„,,,,„ .. ,k i,;./4#10,:e/1/..,••,, , .... ,.., ..... : '''. .,':',;:i'i.:'...:. ' _,'',40'',. ...7.'. ...1,,,,::: •,' :..., „ .,„ - . y,: ,4, - . -...- , • ,ill . ..., . ...• ..,..,,, ,..„ 7_, . ,, ..,.,... g .,, / •4".4ort6;;$1:::•:. ' :IA ...',.. . : .•'"' -.,. -.',:' ' ,:,,%:-*. "-.l'.:,:—.-',',, . .,.., , ....,* . . :, y .q, 4i.:,..„.,A 0_,,,, ya Ntiloa.„40, -, — .,....,, • d,A xu µd. `-.C4:•.,.,, ,l ` „y 012 ''.-'*':"'r''' ' . . .1, ,,,,,t.i ...,•,......1.7„.......,.... rP ..• lb."rfF. 4.,..,,,,.....;,..7. y... 0,3„: "/ / ...., y ass ','-'*•-..,:r /1 .-.t.--- , .A • ,1a `" r •g,).d 1,. ' . >w 1 ..,,,,11".41r,, b.):,,,,,,,,, _ ..,.. -7.1.,..• -,,,•....,":.4. - ,;('-' , 0..*„., h r' ,...;ep „.,,,,,,5,,.,...,,.: .--3.-. . '''...c,',..: ..,,,. (( +(711 1 ��a1;4w' V1Z Pr t 1 59 . .,. r,..,::,,:.....n•..,..::;.,.,n„.,: :I.,M,,...v,,,:...:.,..:.,.,.,,,/m:..„.C.........,.,^.r„.,..r r.,Y,.r.',....,S,:.wr......:... ,..,r,,./,/.......,.....,.,.,/....i,e..i..•.,:,r, ,n...........,../,r/,,,,...,r,.•r.rY,..r;r::;...;,..,..,..,1 v.....r•.: .,:.r..,..,......'/r,r.:...0.,J.r:....,...-...,..t.,.^.,..".,.............:,.,./ -- ...r,..,..r...,;./:... . `rE Jr,1. .r.. r ,,e..,E:/r;/.',•.r, ..v:'..... Y/, ,,,,// ! / / ,W: 1 vc7,77,;;;;;;; / % / r Y. MM r"7H / fi' .eb �^r��n`�kmo / 3 ,M.r/b r.,Mn.x ''''''';':,*:it,,,./ / c�.r /�yvkr. aa3a.$$ rr.'4.- 4, b'.".Y / fr/y2 .4 . , /:. e / :'4, Nv. v r. 5� �. //fro',/,, / / r / ri/a/u r iI, -/L !r"[:N / !.,00,/,:,,,,,:--- * `ii 9, qw„ .. '4, , .,,..,,,,Z;,„ . ,/: , y r / . /l . 3 � . r.�v rv`xx b . .�.4 „ >$' r o ,',..,f,/, 41wn„r x/N✓h:a Vyy . ipqafa, 4u�A Rd�F!h4. . ,q/� r// 9 rY��u1 ,� /rT„rr. l� ,r7N .,$,,,„0„,,,,. xir aydm,d'/ -4,� „/b, 6 «7 „,,,,,,,,F4 „,,,�, lji',,��6yyrl. //./� ,, �.,�la rvK ruY/„,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,A,,,, c Fn - . / ! 9irr//u4l. j,q//L//c/r r, 'n4 i �Capital m rovemen ro ram .. Cily of MBeach, FL ...ii .. ii---- I� 0... '44111100 ,, _ if. 1 0---• mmii–'"-- ....,-„, - _,,,,,14.4� a min mall -----, lit I.,,,..k ' - --'-'4* ti--, ' 01 00 NUM Milli” 111 i' R''' „ow' i ' '. ' ;siA - ._41 „,,-- - ' , _.,.-,. -,,),,,NO II, i I la ii us am ii 5,,., 7,-,' —mai , 1 RN 1m Ili il 11112,1 ' 11. 1 r bx • k ! i pi , ,, , ,i,.. .; aw.o'•.nhNaa<.ro,M.rxr`,,, ir a te., _,1 '4'4.1 __ ,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,, . , .yYwyw,.',. I Key Similarities Start Date: 2004 Completed: 2009 Cost: $100M (Construction) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role:Owner's representative for several construction projects within • Wastewater Collection Miami Beach Contact Information: Jorge C. Cano Systems Reference Telephone Number: 786-412-8660 • Construction Email: JorgeCano@MiamiBeachFL.com Management *Professional Experience of Stephen Baumal • Cost Estimating / SchedulingProject Descption: 300 Engineering Staff* was owner's representative responsible for the day to day oversight and general coordination of several projects within the City of Miami Beach. The total construction cost of the program was $100M, which includes the Multipurpose Municipal Parking Facility (MMPF • $34M). Other projects contemplated in the program were: Flamingo Park & Pool, Miami Beach Golf Course Club House and Maintenance Building, Convention Center ADA Restroom Upgrades, Scott Rakow Youth Center Ice Rink, and the new County Library. Services provided included, but were not limited to: Writing, negotiation and administration of contracts/ service agreements and changes orders; writing City Commission Items; general oversight of the City's consultants including the project Architect; coordinating and chairing of community workshops;day-to-day oversight of general contractors. MMPF The MMPF consists of a six-story parking facility with a five-level city office liner building and public infrastructure upgrades to the surrounding area including: potable water, sanitary sewer, roadways, sidewalks, street lighting and landscaping. This was a high profile and politically sensitive project located within the City Hall campus. Responsibilities and achievements included coordination with the various City Departments to confirm that the number of specified parking spaces was accurate which lead to adding two additional levels to the parking component of the project ilk ENGINEE- ` GROUP P.A. W C Ta b 2 • 1 Qualifications er r-•r ,D 0 , ...„ Similar Experience Miami Beach Golf Course Club House and Maintenance Building This project consisted of constructing a single-story club house building with Pro shop, dining area, bar and an outside terrace area. Flamingo Park and Pool This project consisted of upgrading the park to include a swimming pool, soccer field, basketball courts and covered picnic area. New Regional County Library This project consisted of the design and construction of a new two story 45,000 sf library, and featured a two- story atrium lobby, a 66 foot reading area, children and toddlers areas, a soundproofed multi-purpose meeting/ lecture space, (with 135 seating capacity), a stage area, projection room and storage areas, walled courtyard, and parking lot. Scott Rakow Youth Center Upgrades and Ice Skating Rink This project consisted of general renovations to the first floor of the youth center, such as heating ventilation and air conditioning upgrades to the ice rink. Convention Center ADA Restroom Upgrades This project consisted of major renovations to the convention centers existing restrooms and to make them ADA compliant. \,_ a h. i .1.,:i;. ,, ii-te .., ,.._ a ri , .ir , 4 ........ ., -- ,, ,,, , ., , : , \ ,,,„ ... .\\ \ • „,,,, a"�"^ y., a��:x�� fir. `1\V�\��\\�\\\�1 1�;\��.;. a "°wiz,,, r i ,, to-'. u. ,i`� 'd�"� SIIIP ... rwF HA/AN/HWNvNW� lir w, L — , — ' — .- , ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,:: :1: .itiii, „,\ ow :""'ARF `^'^'^ ., 1Y.77��"" Y§ .7,,+ M 9F -- r n r, ... R„ '• "9'H, W�. r Ka'HMr9r:e^ine•r$i 9'u"'°°'3.4,',.,:: a'M .+k .. / Y�/y .//o'n„µ / '° ' �R R Y? aS ym °ry,.. Atv xA BBn Y"9S, ..FnSz' n NI'�i 4� �q '�� uAp �/��/ w ;;;4,,,Rj .:. .l/,(3 r;:::..y. ,,,,.i” /6n Y;:i..... ' « h ; r did' 'A.4,•1KY 4..,::,, '*;:-.:I ittivit,46, ' Atillifill- Alit * ,. , ,,, ri,,,,,,.. , ,,,— ...tro,, litre, , Pal ail WI S. . ,.— . .411 t; �:� !w..earen 6 , 111 111.1 Imo .."' f I r , 04 ,..., i, , I .„ „ ,4,..„ ,... i _ , isiaki ; i w r: � 4 !o �, 1°"" t ,, ii, . ox t ro R - , .. '.4 Ili oil. ..«�• f140•,mak r . / . a;., 61 0- 4//1ri,.... // �✓7/�,, /� yy � /x r.: � ..:.� Pi l/iirf..,� ,^;h%/" . ri x 4kir yu,44,4 . � i; � / 'ii . � /nN N k r„� **////yr';11/:/',/:;'" f. /'',/,..:/ r.��-:/,,, �N,pµ �"��- Engineenng and for Water, Wastewater; and RPlanning ,,,,,,.„ „. . ,?, :„..., w• IL , 4 ....., I j :. .,ccrt■s Sat w"r .,, 6.L.NL: KW fit Gt rt ��d 1t r.� ! aR , t 0,. t 6}aR` w' Rett ;r R+ IV N..**t s3+rw+MR�i11!`r+R...a+ritiNtts...0...r.tio. = t f' "'S'1* �pw7*►l.*R tiR� ".,. 1a Sa': l�,I'MIL' -r'>,-_ .414,+ -_.. NF .a!l.IRRtRaR 4'1 a R a a R M 1*.'� - �.. t +� !fi `wf •ywq t -+f ." ii .R xr�"r'wR.a.k.tf .. ,,R• x„rt..„L. s A ..SAA ► I :""'": " a�"r R M* �► .�%"ccs-f.1. `RR'^"cevrar u r, ,._._>* I a - ._. - «i w f y g +: pRRraw.Rap.1R - • �', w '. 11�fi as..i � I:. +�''` ��' "' d " .711E RMlMirlrr .t ww xy�1 11.;tRR x M. t w• . �. [ I�yf .�^�ra RseelrcR R w �" *l w i y z ., ♦ w r w r.M* i <; f.wr .c!t'1tNRIr..tR A +.. oy, • w w . r 3 y ... . e w a i «.Rw*Rue* qq :Rr. . n: ♦* .„‘„, - : , . +rR* .n � M r ,. *i' ,,rrt` a %. . v r� ifie*a '�,t: w . Jliati. IN:i \ :::. i / Key Similarities Start Date: 2015 Completed: Present Cost: $7.7M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Engineering and Geological Service, Planning and Design • Wastewater Collection Contact Information: Bertha Goldenberg, PE, ENV SP, LEED®Green S stems Associate y Reference Telephone Number: 786.552.8120 • Water Pump Stations Email: BMG@miamidade.gov • Wastewater Pump/Lift Project Descnption:Stations Tetra Tech is providing engineering and geological services for water, • Hydraulic Modeling wastewater and reclaimed water planning, design, and assistance with • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ the continuation of various program components. Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) is the largest water and sewer utility in Resiliency the southeastern United States, servingnearly2.3 million residents and • Water and Wastewater thousands of visitors on a daily basis.To continue to fulfill the department's Master Planning vision of continuous delivery of high-quality drinking water and wastewater • Water and Wastewater services in compliance with all regulatory requirements, WASD has planned a systematic and responsible multi-year CIP.This plan focuses on System Expansion providing necessary upgrades to thousands of miles of pipes, hundreds of • Construction pump stations, and several and water and wastewater treatment plants (WTP/WWTP) that provide its customers high-quality drinking water and Management wastewater services. Therefore, the water, wastewater and reclaimed • Engineering Studies water program is extremely important and integral to Miami-Dade County • Cost Estimating / and its economic growth.Over the past few years,regulatory pressure has Schedulin required WASD to focus its attention on negotiating and planning strategies g to address the ever-evolving system requirements and challenges,including legislative mandates like the Ocean Outfall Legislation, which mandates elimination of ocean outfall of wastewater treatment plant effluent, and enforcement actions such as the most recent consent decree. Programs, as well as individual projects to meet these requirements have been identified, planned, scheduled and are actively being implemented. WASD has the foresight to understand that regulatory matters must be addressed to resolve the past without neglecting the plans to build the future. WASD has a Planning and Regulatory Compliance Division. Tetra Tech provides on-site staff augmentation for hydraulic modeling, zoning E:f1 TETRA TECH application reviews, and other services to them. In addition, Tetra Tech provides training to WASD staff on various tools utilized, such as hydraulic modeling software. 62 Ta b 2 1 • Pro .oser Qua Similar Experience Water WAS D'S water system serves approximately 440,000 accounts and 14 wholesale customers throughout Miami- Dade County. The water system is comprised of 12 wellfields with over 100 Biscayne and Floridan aquifer wells. It also includes a WTP shared with the City of Hialeah, three main WTPs and five smaller water treatment facilities in the southern portion of the water system. Major issues that are being faced by WASD that are being addressed in the capital improvement program include aging infrastructure, asset management, various water qualities, blending of water qualities, energy consumption, climate change, sea-level rise and many others. The CIP has water projects identified to address supply and treatment capacity increases, rehabilitation of aged assets, transmission and distribution improvements. Planning and preliminary designs are being prepared for priority projects, which are then assigned to design or design criteria professionals for implementation. Wastewater In addition, WASD is currently undertaking three programs, the pump station improvement program (PSIP), the USEPA Consent Decree, and the Ocean Outfall Legislation.These three programs require significant upgrades to the collection and transmission system with stringent deadlines. WASD's primary challenge is to integrate these programs and ensure that any upgrades to the system meet the requirements of all three programs.Miami-Dade County is facing is a growing economy that demands additional capacity for new developments connecting into the wastewater system.Many of these developments are currently delayed due to pump station moratoriums or lack of system capacity. An accurate representation of the system, accounting for future system upgrades, population growth, and operation optimization can facilitate cost effective alternatives that will not impact economic growth while maintaining regulatory compliance.The WASD wastewater system is unique in its size and complexity. It includes three wastewater treatment plants, more than 336,000 retail sewer accounts, 15 volume sewer customers, 1,035 pumping stations, 3,071 miles of gravity collection system, and 910 miles of force mains. The pumping stations and force mains are manifolded, making them challenging to understand, model and control, particularly under wet weather flow conditions. In addition, many portions of the service area are not connected to the wastewater system and a major goal of WASD is to provide wastewater infrastructure within the major commercial corridors that currently are not served by the wastewater system, to promote economic growth and improve environmental conditions. Task Order-Basis of Design Reports One project currently in progress includes preparation of Basis of Design Reports to provide water and wastewater infrastructure in commercial areas of the County to promote redevelopment and economic and job growth. This project includes hydraulic modeling,preliminary design,coordination with numerous stakeholders and permitting agencies, cost estimating, and scheduling. Other projects in the program include: • Regional pump stations evaluations and flow rerouting studies • Well drilling and hydrogeological support services • GIS water demand projections tools development • Relocation of water and wastewater infrastructure from easements to improve accessibility, operation, and maintenance • Administrative and maintenance facilities master plan • SCADA master plan • Water distribution system master plan • Energy efficiency master plan • Basis of design reports for major water transmission mains Climate Change / Sea Level Rise / Resiliency. Another major component of the CIP program is incorporation of resiliency, climate change, and sea level rise into all planning and preliminary design activities. Preliminary designs incorporate sea level rise projections and utility resiliency and flexibility. Energy efficiency and effective utility management are also being implemented utilizing programs developed by the Department of Energy, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. It! 63 '',/1,/,'„! yrf�014.i/,..t//v.�./.:.p r q/,ui,H/a.�,ryj;/;r//I! 7;% V�/i-:,,,H l,/ ...-;./;/'{4....:ii�... of4///r!u,r!r//i /.r!c//h b,r�r,,„4,0,y, //w 0,/ � #/�y/r �y i! � H//,‘",;,',4 rr u „ u 'fr",!. H,.., /„/ .. _/ pr# //v%�•�.tn.. Climate Change on Angeles Aqueduct ...---, .,44,,, A .. M,,«.w. .A . NW T ” ,�,=h+rn „.w :,..,,,,,,,..„,„„,,,,i,,,': a S ;,.,„1/4,....,,,,,„:,,,,....,,,,,,„„,,:, A .;.,;..M � ♦ wR,'fi " ti».,:y..,w .ar r !4 k f. � „ y�q „� +M.« �` �r rk, ox,r ., , ,�. M1r » . . � NN, 5. :"Y� :14;,'" ,tea - , , M e " 1 '.....0 t w ....ten. M:. • k k.r• f1.•M1Yf M .. w f•f 14"•r•k4 f.• w...vv., ., IMx/.r.yfar k ., .... . $.1..r•R*fie v...,. :. 7:fxl lRf•419b w�y»py.yMq wOMM4pMp4AK r. t.dtf••••l.at 1 M ,. rowwr,,^ .� ^'R^" k1I•YYY Y.kYl.1..y1.�'F° riti2 .+r..••;.a !HUM'S wy R.e•r..••..•4 .w. y4iw�:. N Y. 1..N 1. MYr wwlw .A I R ...1 f •« tlnti, Ifwwwl�wfr d..•9•Y.r•Rkfllr a r' A i �••vr�lal ranerwkeww ww r�. r r .. tawsa.w�= t I Nkk,..........k aa'� rwwtwf.►wwww ,} w.........r k. ..,,;. , C a ri.,41:::::::rM• fi�r..k... axarr►, a s r,r, .,: ` —. •...1..R..o M:'•, .:r1r. wrwi. .w...M�lw ..NarFw .. .w1fr I- If r:::: «.rawrr 1•a•«M••.. "wYew amp_. �*•wr.r w•.r +.wrt. 4:::: sw r rse ) f *. -4,i.°•11:..E ii r1• �� iN�N�1�l/Mws4 " ��. s 1'�ws'k'•'."' :.-Mw. .s. �f •�" � `� NwMf+1r4•r� t 4 1�a•..rro •.r«•r••r•r.r••dt k�. .� to...,. � Jll 111111 REP •. A . :�<rs-.,... .: :*•-�rirr•N . ,w«,.. ; .r�..�«�.a-.,.�+�{ - MwrrrMrfw�r. '*M s.>€* --,- .k•kala ar.•r.rr w -. ,t„ 7 .; y...✓d. Mr.«.». •', �' '� � � ' la>rQN•!N .IaN ........ ..,_ F� ES--- ...-se.tr, .k kkk • Mph 4, r~�� .fie �. •.Y mss&+.a+Sc.kR �k♦ •A M fir. ....71.174.1"'"- •••�4w M } f.aawr•awrswPr au.afpa •w !FFs$�"w..,,,�. rlk• � +k .,.. � . w t .,. v4wits, lMM�arw`w! .� s�++.s. w• .. ._... -Ftp •.,,vv .•• ..v w . ..� .��t• ww.awww•f.f •.aa.aw w* s 9+,.kY..MIK « .. -W .F• x ...• s `1R /"kk' •wlftaswaa k+: r---.. •. F..,, w•ya• y _ ••1 i. .M IKey Similarities Start Date: : April 2009 Completed: June 2011 Cost: $800K (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Analyze the impacts of climate change on water supply • Hydraulic Modeling infrastructure Contact Information: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power • CC/SLR/.Adaptation/ Reference Telephone Number: 213-367-2166 Resiliency Email: delon.kwan@LADWP.com • Engineering Studies Project Deschption: Tetra Tech worked with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) to analyze the impacts of climate change on water supplies from the Eastern Sierra Nevada, and to evaluate adaptation strategies to address the impacts of such changes. Future sustainability of this water supply source is of critical importance to the city's growing population and large economy. Water from snowmelt in the Eastern Sierra Nevada is an important water source,and climate change impacts are expected to result in(1)significantly lower supply in some years,(2)extreme precipitation events, and (3) earlier snowmelt. These changes were quantified using a suite of models (downscaled climate data, watershed and operations models),and the impact to water supply, hydroelectric power generation, and safety of existing dam and conveyance infrastructure was assessed. The engineering assessment including an evaluation of the intake structures, conveyance facilities (open channels and closed conduits), four dams and associated hydropower generating facilities. Specific adaptation measures that were evaluated and engineering conceptual costs were developed for the following: raising the height of the primary dam to handle larger peak flows (Long Valley Reservoir), development of new surface storage sites, development of groundwater storage sites, and additional import of water from outside the basin. Of the adaptation measures, groundwater storage was found to be most cost-effective to capture peak flows in wet years for use in below-normal dry years with capital costs an order of magnitude smaller than for new surface storage. lit TETRA TECH 64 Tab 2 . 1 ,, ,,,,,,, Pro ioser Qualifications Similar Experience CR OWLEY ' LAKE ,,. monoi.k./‘, ,:. 4 ''l -:.4: ''‘,,--s-- '.'''''3,, ? ' 0,,-,,,,,: .,,A.:::::,....:* ,, ., i ,,..: ',:. 0,,,,,,,,,,,,:). -'4,;i.' I 0. '" ,, ' illa Pale 1,711 ro's7; . , 1 'l'...,.—,• C 0 rromwoon-,. liF g Z 1,K __.„.zviiii fscrir,7,31' ' NORTH ssAticrf--,\ \I Ar,,.,, ',-PLEASANT VALLE s SOUTH HAJWCE, s'.. Na .. :x.orystl 'W NW -•2.....; MINA. ',.,. ',',•".... -il, „Nsio„ ,, ,,.,, ,.,,z, ,,,, ,,,., .,, ,,•-....,.,: 1 i UPPER Sic,. 4, 1 cAstross 1 L.A.f SAN FRANC:SW.0TO 2 _ ,......,/,.....*..............,, ..,„„, i TONE CANYON, \ LOS Assents, ' , , ' OMMODYKake ----- ' 1 CANYON-, 1 a NW' ‘WW, -SAN FERNANDO 1 -An e - Hire Roinvir ' . 9". '''''.,2:•''',4 ',._.., 1 ' Estimated Historical 1. 1 Average actual(2000 1111111111111111M1 -2010) • • • • • • . . ' i t' ( . • . • ,, ' ‘ - .i Historical climate,current proposed operations(1950-2004) .--,,,,,,,,;-...-,,,,,,,,....9-.....:',=','-.-;;.!;•=f.t.'`.1=;.'''.:r...=:=,-..--';"..,''''' . Projected climate,as-built condition(2010-2098) ;•-•v.-''''''''''-'•'.'"' '•''''''.---.'••!' Projected climate,increased storage at Tinemaha,North .......................;.............................., , „' ' ...f,'-,,,,‘. -:'I,„',Ne•,,,-'.'••.. ''' - - '1 Haiwee.and Bouquet Reservoirs(2010-2098) Projected climate,increase of Long Valley storage(2010-2098) ,.7".' '' '''''''''.7''''''''''''''''''''1`• 4A:17 '''''''' 1:'' '‘.0‘'„fir'„, '''"7'1::i':.,••;,','-4100,‘ .' ,e '"A '' -1;;°'- ;,..), Projected climate,new storage(2010-2098) ! --' '" 7,---------'----t , ,.. ...__... ___....._ .........._ .....__.:- i, Projected climate,Neenach pumping(2010-2098) '•''''''''1'.'''''''""'"''''''''‘‘ "" 1 / ,,,,,,,,,, ' ,,, , , ,.. Los Angeles' \,,, ,, -- 1 "'itt Projected climate with four mitigation measures(2010-2098) •.-—---"-'-•'".'"'---".- ;/' ',,,,'' %,'', --,---,' ,-,”' , .\," ' „1.'-',,,'• ' 4 - ,,,. ' ' ' %5,, kWh/month 0 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 ,, -, ' ,, .,.. Dry Conditions Historical,Projected Operations /Short Term Historical a Long Term Historical 65 7,,, Ciiy of 0 o0 Water MainReplacement .. , . ,, ,... ..... � M d .,. , , Sava r. `,�, rt,: .., ... • s , ..-, .. k p �� 400 ii, &. 4 Fir s. 7, ... �r . ,--- ...., 171111 r, N,, . Nit uwll. a _ y (IL „ . iff I, , 4, I iij, .„14,._ ' , .,,, „, Niiilt p g 1 ri. '1 ' . 1 vil ' 4 i i. I t . -,' .7-..or ear f - - a ....ti , r: - - II ' . I - ' it 1 - ' '40”' f a 0 - 1 z 411- 0 ,, 7-0,14011,* r ....4/ I.. i6�a� / I ; ty g i 3iTTS w., 'I' i i 1,7- y' r . „ , x s d�� . .a... -'SEC Y roil . / . .. , . 4 1,y > 1 ' ' i _ _ . , - '1 1 �r:; ,,...w.. ins. awMM .,a •ace w- —..."a rra a^s�, ' +1. .1rrrwrw : II I sF ire ,NGu Y '� as„, �.....-0,—, � "" —: adY r"$ 40,,ar iN',r Mr4,,,,, ,.y" Key Similarities Start Date: 2011 Completed: On-going Cost: $3.94M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Water main replacement • Water Distribution Desi n Contact Information: Clece Aurelus, PE g Reference Telephone Number: 954.921.3930 • Engineering Studies Email: CAURELUS@hollywoodfl.org • Cost Estimating / Project Descnption: Scheduling The City of Hollywood is undertaking a water main replacement program throughout its water service area, due to the age and condition of the existing water mains. Tetra Tech has been assisting the City with this program since 2011 and multiple projects have been successfully designed, permitted, constructed, and in operation. Tetra Tech has provided surveying, geotechnical evaluations, design, permitting, and construction management for multiple projects under this program. The program includes the replacement of over 225,000 feet of water mains ranging in size from 4-inches to 24-inches in diameter, utilizing various pipe materials including PVC, HDPE, DIP, steel, and PCCP. Construction methods include open cut for roadways and horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and jack and bore installations under major intersections and the FEC railroad. Construction administration services are also being provided for these projects, including bidding assistance and engineering services during construction including review of shop drawings, assistance with contractor requests for information, field directives, pressure and bacteriological testing, permit clearances and as-built drawings. The following projects have been assigned to Tetra Tech to date: • Project 1 - Hollywood Boulevard to Johnson Street-27,000 LF of Water Main Replacement, Designed, Permitted, Constructed • Project 2 - Hollywood Boulevard to Sheridan Street East of Federal Highway-99,000 LF of Water Main Replacement, Designed, Permitted, Under Construction • Project 3 - Hollywood Boulevard to Sheridan Street West of Federal Highway - 99,000 LF of Water Main Replacement with 4 trenchless crossings of the FEC RR, Under Design and Permitting • Project 4 - Hollywood Boulevard from City Hall Circle to West Dixie Highway - 3,000 LF of Water Main Replacement with FDOT Complete E:f1 TETRA TECH Streets Project, Under Design and Permitting 66 , , , ,, , „,,, Ta b 2 • 1 , , o erQualifications Similar Experience , . A ,. ., ,, iii. f ,,.: ..),..., I -- -,.., , d kor�. .WWW.P .aa '., — ' \ i '''''‘ ',:. ' '' 04,:'" , ,, ,; , le, ,,,,,,,;.,,,,,,,,,,:::;,.. ...,,„,.. . ,,, s ,".a a >. ;« "` ;' F 11111111P1 ... P44 ''r' r''''' ',,:-,„,,„ ,,. . A Fr o° °WI ' .:;:::,'';' , ., , Y z „.......,, . ”:' :-4:: - * '- ,..':.:* " ..,.• . , ,., ,. ' r s' � x „h, . • ,,,, ,, ...,... ..... , .. .., ,,,,. , ,. ,, ., •,,,,,,.: .... ..,.....„. , ..r.,„ . , . . ,.. ... ; , _,-,_ .,,lioar ,., ..„ - — .,,,,, . ,+ Y:; r ,i a ,q' NY.y, gd \ 1 /i �, '��Ywyr � dam �� R' 9� M^ � i10:4P-'' "W ^: . • -.'+' , --- .„. .. \ ;:,:,4„-.,„' 4 a -,',.::::;;;;;',':,:',„*‘..::P0,,„ WR� r '14!.,,,,!;"1.. 1,.',4• — a% , n.', 0. nx. w xa ' EXISTING CO$FIGIURATION Of t .tY ' BLVD, .A „F ui ro � M1W( �M ky e. y. IJ � S" a M f W' xb �" �, a3 y w;. 6. u/ „„ a ' ' • . P PROPOSED CONFIGURATION OF HOUYYWC00 RIVE", NIA wz 'sr icounts)^..., ao 6uC.,1as117,1, �► ctisx AMA � , „ \ - : „iiii.;i„::(:4,:_,,, ,,E.:j/;;;LiNto..,-,-.02irgougzi, votazi,‘„,.,' koo,i,“4,0: ,,,,,,,,' 3 .RAs. ; a it j •... al�ii , yaw 1 "14; . rN.r ,ua , .'..8,i- ' „_.,„.,,,,, 4 ,1/471 ..,",,,,,,,,,:i 0 , , . , .....,,., VL , .. '. ' *4:1'-Crtsi* /1"z(!ft ---Cfli , (/; # \ '""..IIAYL ''�A GIN, . ..r x ar.°..l itW�'A 74 Cuff,/* `"+,,°' •$ 'Ts' :#..ate "� to lam the ,"—lrt '*f TQM 1CAiWS? S `�. W 4�� R to I�f:'�.f.'IIR1V' .11 o_�/.Ome�..�4.X NO 0,44141,410 INOMPEWITS SC;(8 Aftesc.moto mitat. IP , HOLLYWOOD BLVD. SECTION 'A' 67 "/.//h%4 /4(001p//r, ;r':,,;/> n„a ,-: r., :ZH%//N, nor,;%Y!/'; /': :••i::;; r ,!:r• >,.. 1 /r. /,:r/r!-�%� l/„//,;:///i//.//:h�lld�y///!,��rd/,/./ ��/'r///i ,��//,��!'/'f'.// G•.; kyr f;h•K' (;144 i/ ir�/r,r!/'/,/ '/' 7//1,;/ /,r/ q"k';'9N;7/y, o/d/!N :y, ,%:r tiff;,i'', :,r I Y".:: Nl:/. ¢{H�//y1//I p 3w a ;d.///, /17,/ //%' �..//,-/,[ . ,a (Y/:// (y,%1r/(//1/1r/, r,: ,,!�.. ,. G/�y�'„.. '; ,. �. /.! k. r:..;,. .,,�/.M;,..,::.,..,.,,,i��/ %i; �� ;.,.:/, /:n.no'.: ,n'lvry//,! /////m�2pw/M: ,ri�r�N/!/y!%y/Hyy✓¢r!F/�N'i;91"wHr,40,44010,#//iv,,; r !�/�//,/,,,,,,r.;., ,;,a r ,r�' �/0��;! r' .,, r., rrNi!N al,;:/!/m/�rn u% '„r ; :fin,,: /t,,,,/d�/,!l/riri{4 ,,,,v Water, as ewa er, & Reclaimed Planning: Task 1 - ♦ '' 4` ' yri.• i • • M Mwp .., a .A,.. , "q`ti , k_,..., _,,,.,--_ -,+r O ,. t.,,,,,,,,,,...„, Aic..{ :r.owa-.,4„i,' 2 , --,4,7 . . , -..: 0,,,, t... ..,. - #141.. --..-„, 4 ., v.f.i- 1 4' ., 040.VT. 4- 4------e—''''.4--,,-,..,,.. ' ' 1 ' , `.4:-e7 fi 7":'_:' • ' r'. 't '4-1 Vii, ' ' ,*iii ' OA%6....4%.7.illh AltabVit A "7!):41' 1 'I ' ''''''A': ” '‘,.. .4; I ILL,4'%.1A 1. ' . ” ''. ` .1 10�% a 9i j s a .- . '£-%:.,,,t 40.1, ,.— A 'Sy+ i��.� r .;:5. r y z 4i tiIf.M 14 t -w, 1;IR��Nitu - I�%" `,'.4!:::,,,,....y.„;.' 0.titits7041P. '‘‘• " , 4: -,-,-4-,i SEnERDINIBIBIk w .. .,,, % ! ---4 . - 4- # :: 1!-‘,40 -44.41.44t. .400*.; -, * 4',Forniv 6 ''' '''''' ' ', . : ,i '`. ',4:',14,4),' „ °#V4.40ir v $.4 Ss 1 '''' 4 , , ,,,,,,,,31, . )ts.,.. 09 2.r.,„,....,,,_,..i,,,..i.;:s, {....... .. ., -''',` It'I''4 04%0.44VitiVsttt's i , mets , , : m, ,t4-11;1\(tACi fliiia ,'.4;7, ,.'..)071.4: :',....i, . 4 ie:' % i t: Ii a .A 4`.4a� 'R'" _�,,,.,', ,v,�_ �«��' ,o ...�' .-e� �p 4..LL I..J.� 4412 -;� c k. ,, " _. . «• _ 4.. :" r i s i edit. S'` „,,,,\\, 7 , f =• '.,•! 4.;�,�'* 'b” .. �s'. - � "j`. , ✓ f '' b Wrte * as ay« � b, '. ` r p .a a 4 w. RI.Y,Kr ,. f,.. -.4.'..',1s,e- ,:1-1,--;,..0/ 1 e n.' .'' .il ","b .. 4, ,, .,'.../%04 * kiti . . ...: :,, ,y�.. :.�4 ',_,`-V'.t. `•",,,.. °d'" ,-'�(; t byti l ° .,x ,�','.. ,�f�,F' _d' ..,i,!,,,...v4i4,41„,,, .,,,,..., . .. , r `;,fs`�A4. « c04!'vyv ,i .. ,.'� �� •�•: , 'r + 1 ' :14, -ir ` ir tl, ' ,* ....,,,,,, 'Tr ve ir,-- ' A, - . ` ''------- iff $4 fv44414,it t . it,4? -- , 47, , \c,%, , ' "4°• . ", 4 ,42,10),... ,iiii,.. -..410 _ ' .., 0, ' ' to,/ 4.tirorp. ., 4.4itti, ,,,,,,. •,„. )„. p"' I 4 a, #` ids 1,,, ,..\\,,,, ,,� , ,, M 'a ,i,„ . ,,, Yj k7,., „,, . .., e• i ,e1 ;,./,‘, , ,J fill - ' Se iiii.Stti***4.4$0,.44N)t' . .... '''i/..,.../I' „,44:,,ii ' .: .."1, ,,,,I , 1 fi' ,e . ,.- , ),,,, . vivi.*sisloi•illsstssoct,. &.'" -"„lorept! ',,:,-, , ',-: .5.-4;;-'-'/*--7 ' ,‘ it/44,40044 i!° 4► X 4 6 ' , ' 3 -; �. r ,,. M>. T .: ;.a t, -;'.$41` J , j".,r. '..,7,, ,l ,,v.• A '4:- ,,.,;, �{ .dv/,•, if, :.4f. �L. '444)10 J q/'7 y{�{ ''. .. 4 A IAr g,� P► A A,. - -` A.' /,._.✓ v '40,1" �♦ aJ T z:...+_ '� ..1;" 1, N t$ 1'�` '" ' ,,/ ,,r q.// c ry lora fl .' J c ry r ,. "z,a,, '#1:,, tit,7' i.., , .„:„...4,,,,A4, 4/ n, , ..yP,'C',„.x r ,,�, 1 0 b'� y Key Similarities Start Date: 2013 Completed: On-going Cost: $3.94M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role:Planning,preliminary design,implementation,and construction • Wastewater Collection of the water and wastewater infrastructure Contact Information: Bertha Goldenberg,PE, ENV SP, LEED® Green Systems Associate • Water Pump Stations Reference Telephone Number: 786.552.8120 • Wastewater Pump/Lift Email: BMG@miamidade.gov Stations Project Descption: • Hydraulic Modeling Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) is the largest water and sewer utility in the southeastern US, serving nearly 2.3 million residents • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ and thousands of visitors on a daily basis. In order to continue to fulfill the Resiliency department's vision of continuous delivery of high quality drinking water and wastewater services in compliance with all regulatory requirements, • Water and Wastewater WASD has planned a systematic and responsible multi-year capital Master Planning improvement plan. This plan focuses on providing necessary upgrades to • Water and Wastewater thousands of miles of pipes, pump stations and water and wastewater treatment plants that provide you high quality drinking water and System Expansion wastewater services. Therefore, the water, wastewater and reclaimed En ineerin Studies water master plan contract is extremely important and integral to the • g g Miami-Dade County. • Cost Estimating / Scheduling Over the past few years, regulatory pressure has required WASD to focus its attention on negotiating and planning strategies to address the ever evolving system requirements and challenges including legislative mandates like the Ocean Outfall Legislation and enforcement actions such as the most recent consent decree. Programs, as well as, individual projects to meet these requirements have been identified, planned, scheduled, and are actively being implemented. WASD has the foresight to understand that regulatory matters must be addressed to resolve the past without neglecting the plans to build the future. The Tetra Tech team was selected to rovide engineering p and geological services for water, wastewater, and reclaimed water planning. Throughout the course of this project, our team will provide a diversity ilb TETRA TECH of services related to planning, preliminary design, implementation, and construction of the water and wastewater infrastructure,including climate change and sea level rise considerations. Services include water and r,r /.� I-./r,:/H,:.o:r!•/,/,„.l/ri_1,/,/r,/%,,;..;. r. ydev.,r"/ / "r. Hf // /// H :4 '/ 144,b4/6/ 13 4 . ✓ // � . ,../ ,,... -,,.': ""////%/,..! r//G / /..:.%t/ / rrd4//n / Ta b 2 1 • Pro •oser Qualifications Similar Experience wastewater systems hydraulic modeling, flow projections, master planning, operational studies, hydrogeological evaluations,geological evaluations,process optimization,cost estimating,scheduling,and additional engineering support services as requested by the client. Tetra Tech is also aiding WASD through on-site staff augmentation for the determination of capacity analyses of various systems as well as with the water supply well development program. Current task orders to date include: • Task Order#1: Geological Services Assistance • Task Order#2: Hydraulic Evaluation of Existing Pump Stations 44, 49, and 62 • Task Order#3: NW 79th Street & NW 7th Avenue Basis of Design Reports & Hydraulic Evaluations • Task Order#4: Basis of Design Report Services for Water and Sewer Services • Task Order#6: Capacity Analysis for Water and Wastewater Dev Connections • Task Order#7: Hydrogeological Support Services -Staff Support Tetra Tech services have aided in the development of basis of design and budgeting of capital improvement projects for the Miami-Dade County water distribution and wastewater collection and transmission systems, understanding their operation and capacity. Tetra Tech has assisted in the streamlining of planning and zoning application process as well as provided in-house support to the Hydrologic Division in the completion and proper implementation of some of its projects. • Use of the latest software and staff working on the cutting edge of water and wastewater technologies. • Excellent and constant communication with client providing one on one attention to their needs. • Constant communication and coordination with stakeholders including: commissioners; utility companies; local and State agencies, and members of the community among others. '4! 69 , , City of DrPlane Improvement P zr.-„--- *; , \ _ _ ,„,,, tw ,,,, \ , ,ems „�.,. \ \ �p \ , „4--,_- 'w ,- 1.ii,to, . 'F., ''' ' . , 'it , 4 ,F. ',., ilL2r 56,4 it lir 4,„ '' # 4, AIL 4 _.. tflailit, W, AE . r \ig k ---- , k' .. _ ,. -,,, ,. , s'i,4 ,,,.. , ....,:, - . - - O . \ 44 * - ' 6 eir- . . .. , , ..„,„ n'o ......„,„. , , . :.,..-,,,,,,-,_— 'I 116:— ,.., u rN \air 'u• .:., Nty : S: 'W.o41 'M° . +� .wc.4? ..>" .. .-..i'' nF e . : r a w" t-,\'!„'Ir 'tit'„,,, c" " .. , w e . 1. tlln, •. `w .n ay 1* eKey Similarities Start Date: 05/2006 Completed: 04/2007 Cost: $170K (Engineering Fee) • Hydraulic Modeling Firm's Role: Development of stormwater master plan and CIP for City of • Engineering Studies Doral Contact Information: Edward Rojas Reference Telephone Number: 305-5936690 Email: Edward.rojas©cityofdoral.com * Professional Experience of Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD, BCEE, D.WRE, PMP, F.ASCE Project Description: � 300 Engineering staff* provided engineering services for a cost-effective Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) for City of Doral. The SWMP was based on a comprehensive program of data collection and management, hydrologic and water quality modeling, to achieve distinct levels of service for water quality, pollutant reduction and flood protection. The scope of work tasks were focused on: • The collection of existing information from entities other than the City, and their graphical representation in maps that can be used for stormwater master planning purposes; this task consisted of project startup with the City; meetings with Miami-Dade DERM and their stormwater master planning consultants; compiling and mapping the necessary information for this SWMMP effort. • Basin and sub-basin delineation within the City of Doral: this allows for an organizational framework to identify and propose solutions to stormwater management problems; • Prioritization of identified stormwater management problems, to allow for a corresponding prioritization of expenditures and the development of a Capital Improvements Plan for SWMP improvements in the City. This project encompassed the first phase of a SWMP prepared by the City in agreement with the South Florida Water Management District, with a total of three major tasks that contributed to the City's first Comprehensive Master Development Plan as well as the capital improvement project AI schedule. ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. Ta b 2 1 • , , - Pro ioser Qualifications Similar Experience Phase I scope of work tasks were focused on: • The collection of existing information and their graphical representation in maps that can be used for stormwater master planning purposes: this phase of the project produced the following work products: (i) a compilation of stormwater management problems identified by the City of Doral; (ii) a GIS containing stormwater entities within the City (complied from FDOT and DERM sources), land use information (existing and future), topography, hydrologic data (rainfall, groundwater levels). • Basin and sub-basin delineation within the City of Doral:this allowed for an organizational framework to identify and propose solutions to stormwater management problems. A basin boundary delineation was prepared using AutoCAD to support the calculation of basin and sub-basin boundaries and storage characteristics.This delineation will be used as input to the hydrologic model in Phase II of this project. • A initial prioritization of identified stormwater management problems,to allow for a corresponding prioritization of expenditures and the development of a Capital Improvements Plan for this project.The results of the SWMP modeling allowed to determine the relative severity of stormwater quantity and water quality problems in the City. As this phase of the work was primarily focused on data collection and processing, it is worthwhile to comment on the sufficiency and reliability of the data that has been gathered for this project. With respect to data sufficiency, i.e., is enough data for a SWMP, the most notable finding was the absence of water quality data collected within the City boundaries. This is not uncommon for recently established cities such as Doral, where the medium to long-term water quality data collection programs have not yet been implemented.It was strongly recommended that existing and future SWMP water quality conditions be assessed and complemented with water quality measurements in receiving water bodies, particularly in the Dressels and Northline canals. Specific recommendations as to the frequency and location of such measurements was made in the SWMP. Specific recommendations for stormwater management improvements were included in a Capital Improvements Program for the City. A,. ! , . I y:ry 4 -1 41WCIA$ f-� ,-+,, }. a "; e *.):„.':-A.,,,,,,A, c1, _i " .,Hvwe ' . y i Jrx,y "*„;,!.7.31'. l'i' :::: ,d'ae�+Cx'H"trM64rmtsaw n�' ,�,�`�• y�~ �m, d; ayi .� ",.•�...uud'��,"«. ,,...., ; s y,..5 ,, �w,,--�",�:-%:,,,,,,,-ry n( .at .w ..a `it.. 4 v. .... �g�� A� "�A:." % « �;: .(ah$ x w r ryp„lr F 0 a;: �.. _ dry qi� 7i,,,,,;747:4.:',*-:::,:: e M.. ro aw° ` y�q�'�""'J7"M1`+'°,,: *`r o° 3�os 4tsfm � ,(. ,*' "",�YwD�� -rr n`�7:aP�+'Y�%'�, M vp- A, .' ~.��QAC }: '� + //' i £ "xs.i'r..-',,"'V g' M m ri" 'I "�rM *�,�� :4 %�� :J .„ y �S.I a�� ,,D.°. .,. ��4J., u! ..,.., "'�° _ �'A at4^�a$rat,, ,�p� 40: aw„ff � e � 1e �ttd '! d r r'MMM!r+�+y/m1t IP.:pT�y�: '. n „'xyy t�H A , h ;,!,,...4,11,,,,,,:,,::21,:'„,, LkRic' ,'Ilf--."'' ';' Ca •t3S141t St y SS Al Q ' ', , —. 41°. til d as a a „ 11 ... ...,,,,, : , aii ,�� .'"^'•es�'th....2-„--,,,,.- .:xmv>asur::a .�"'.ccs:_ass_-.onczex � , v ;n �'w��M'Y,q��.,' '�"p' . mmwr.J;,p...w .. w.m.., .. �M ,--- �_._........ 6 r ., ih . . NW 7761 CI ara NW 55t1 St SW comer `6 WO 95en Ave 50 6 S ad NW 2550 Ss € '1,44...'' 1 NW 326x!St app n W of NW'9th Ave ao N A+00 ;9 NW 946t A.e S a,Wi 25tH SR 1 d 2 NW 34th St"tam N NV,'Rh Gt to NW 79tH Ave . NON 93rd Are S at tiNV 25*Ss 506 1 NW Tea»Ave t"an+NW 37m St ro kW 32<ta S: 2 s *d1W 97ys awe ma VW 6+�Rie Aw �,,. ='3 ic 4 NW 777h Ct tam NW 37Mt St to NW 29th Ss 22 ?WK r St R5 9SW:211 St S ,Y.,298,135o tt W od N W 798,Ave 27 NV 97th Atre NW 52,3 St 5 acme i e NW''h Ave aha NW 29th St W arae 24 NE*97,dere NW 2766,:Ss W toe gar*s :. 7 NW 31*.200}r=_of NW 82ra Ave 25 NW 97th Ave**/s 4t!"St __ 8 NW 92nd Ave and NW 33ra St comer 26 NW Arm 25670.tpdsr4>~s 2.166�e,W sue 'oral irte `=i(25 Street 9 NW 8461 Ave Ana NW r 261 Si,barer 27 "8806'- Are NW 27,,NE se* 0 �; i 10 NW 12er St Opp h E ad NW 8961. 29 NW`67,Ave VW 4,a Ss W are E.as* "1 NW 871h Ave ane tial"311't St SW�xoner a 29 Nw'.L°7rp0 Axe tdil8d 33r:32�arae 3��p°4 Nd �w`°' � g 12 .'r1W 924: 241 St 300 tt_of re 97th Ave 30 N,,1 07ta?Ade NW 43r6 St t3 NW 97:1 Ave300hNdraV+t3thSt , VW?t21a..4+e.ane76162911 �v�„� . i \,1 t 4 NW 9881 Ave,50 R S at NW 25th St 32 +WOW t,,,ave and NVW SIdJ. y 15 'vw 9641 Ave' t S of NW 25th St 39 MY:Ree..Ave aecNeeen•290 St ary'Str. a.,-,r t 6 BIW 98!1 Ave'500'Sot"dY 0 25Lh St 34 '0 8e Peer'-,s0x,tge ea 5,lift, ss� t7 NW 98aft Ave at the very erW Cu%rsA•Sac L i.. ,IL a B. --... III — Fi urs Public Works Identified Stormwater Problem Areas g Basin and Sub-basin Delineation Map( BDM) City of Doral Stormwater Management Master Plan 3-7Figure City of Doral Storrmwate Management Masten Plan 3-3 1! 71 .,:..,. ... ..r,...Y`?..e...,.....:. ,.....r.....:,,A.,,.(_,..,,...rr.h.5,,....:•.....r.:,,.r,,..,.,J.:,.n...n.r,r....,,r.r„'/,.r.r,./,....,.,„........:.,.:;:..,...a.,.',;::,..:.....,r,.....:.,-:,..:..r.r.,..,.,,..,n.... a.,.J.,....:...r:.:.:.'t'..,:,....„.ir,.,r.F,;';,,r/,/'r„•:...../:r..:.a .,r. ....../..,.r,...,x,.........r.:.r M ,..•.,,./,J%X.>.',J ...r..,r. u '5J $, � a r.•,,.r...,.,.,!, r.'..J...:.n. :. rl � * .!r �lT , lh / - w" : ;; ::, '' . nyA, /.: ./ ; ... rAYa . L % !/ �, f h " w HYnv '114 . , y 714,�' S113;°,40','::dAN :� :"l /' /�aa�W �! 'a >�_aVn. a.''';44140.$4,:v , lirxV/N/7 yqCI,r!r.,4�p/ r a;lra, Y4 . ,yfr+vMR.Sr�.$ nS,/Ar ��1wN.Any11/F”��c:r /LN/,a//rJl/r, an. ; . rxJt H/�.n//%41,' 1.!/rr � F:7,'4,‘,<,Na „,'�,/ 4,,,,/ dr4r�eJrry7 � — Climate ane an ea eve e ac s�s m in �-p � Trinidad ,,,, ..r,„, : . 4,„ ,,,„ „„,. . „1/4,.. Aird.v/P: , 4,jp, 7 , ge k g 40.. okhy le- IP --.. , llik` ' 1 _,.. ii , 4 4r ,. .441, , k " - ' '"ir—)p, ' /,, , 4 Alt:t Art r , rF , ._,,,,,, .., it , , S3J ''? + '+ , x n Sok % x ” '4 "� a AMl'd6W. �,,: `� r, '11104111, '11411.'dip NO�..,•S:. - JY r' N��IM14!M ,, 'ry�N/ � „�' a 1�"\, � S4) a, v ift ' ' —' ' " Key Similarities Start Date: 01/2015 Completed: Present Cost: $350K (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Assessing impacts and adaptation to sea level rise on water • Wastewater Collection and sanitation infrastructure in the island of Trinidad Contact Information: Raul Munoz Systems Reference Telephone Number: 202-6231000 • Hydraulic Modeling Email: raulmu@iadb.org • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ * Professional Experience of Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD, BCEE, Resiliency D.WRE, PMP, F.ASCE O Water and Wastewater Master Planning Project Descption: • Engineering Studies 300 Engineering staff* provided engineering services to determine the potential impacts of sea level rise (SLR) on the salinization of coastal aquifers which are important sources of freshwater supply for Trinidad. The safeguarding of freshwater resources is a concern expressed by the national water utility,the Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA).Whereas sea level rise may have an impact on the interaction between sea water and coastal aquifers, on-going extraction and patterns of land uses in upstream catchments are also likely to be important due to their potential impact on aquifer recharge. To consider the importance of sea level rise WASA requested to provide details of salinity intrusion problems in coastal aquifers, preferable confined to a specific local aquifer. In particular, sea level rise poses threats to development in low lying coastal areas on the West Coast,where petrochemical and chemical industries are of particular concern and where flooding from the sea is already a management challenge. Concern about the investments in the oil and gas industry along the West coast motivated this study, which reveals the severity of climate change impacts while demonstrating an approach to sea level rise vulnerability assessments. The study amongst others emphasize the importance of mainstreaming climate change vulnerability assessments into long term planning and emphasizes the need for integrated approaches to planning in the coastal areas. A structured approach to address shoreline concerns produced by this study engaged WASA in a more comprehensive shoreline management proactive approach, • - - - applying sediment cell and management unit analyses to inform spatial /z Tab 1 2 . 1 , vv v . ,_,,wv , ,, - , a.,, „ Pros oser Qualifications Similar Experience planning.Shoreline vulnerability assessments look at the coastal profiles in combination with sea level rise scenarios. The Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA), which was created under the WASA Act 1965, is the statutory body responsible for carrying out the Government policies related to water and wastewater and for the provision of water and wastewater services in Trinidad and Tobago. WASA has approximately 340,000 customers. While it is estimated that 92% of T&T's population have access to a piped water supply, the water supply system operates under constant challenges, mostly related to aging pipes and lack of the adequate maintenance. These problems have led to a gradual deterioration of the network, high level of non-revenue water (as high as 44%), and low service levels (only 20% of the population in Trinidad and 58% in Tobago have access to continuous water supply). The water sector is also heavily affected by the poor performance of the wastewater treatment plants as they impact the quality of surface and ground water sources - representing 62% and 27% of the total water supply respectively. Trinidad & Tobago introduced centralized sewer and wastewater treatment systems in the 1960s. Since then, the sewage collection and treatment infrastructure has grown to an estimated 560 km of sewers and 243 wastewater facilities in both Trinidad and Tobago. However, this infrastructure only covers approximately 30% of T&T's population (about 400,000 persons serviced by centralized systems), with the remaining 70% serviced by septic tanks and pit latrines. The main sewered areas include Port of Spain, San Fernando and Arima in Trinidad and Scarborough in Tobago. Current WASA statistics for wastewater can be summarized as follows: (i) only 20%of the total population serviced by WASA's centralized sewerage system; (ii) operation of 40 wastewater treatment plants and 32 lift stations;and (iii) average wastewater flows treated of 13OMI/d. Overall,the wastewater sector faces the following challenges: (i) limited expansion of the central sewers; (ii) tariffs below the cost of providing sewerage services; (iii) limited financial and human resources; (iv) poor infrastructure designs; and (v) poor maintenance of the existing infrastructure. Consequently, the sewerage system is currently in a state of despair and in urgent need of rehabilitation. Present and Projected Future Rainfall (mm) in Port of Spain 250 200 150 .Present 100 —_- X22050100 50 �, • d II in II O till Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 414 it 0 4* ), 4* b;, \" * -,, \, 4* : \. 4* , '7 —t71 . ik.4„/ .,. ' ast,4 '. i ',* ' ''>' ' itik I ***** 04 4 ,, , i . ,. ,,, . ', - 4,, , -iticfr * , - * - * ' * , Trinidad Present Trinidad 1m SLR Trinidad 2m SLR Trinidad 3m SLR Trinidad 5m SLR Trinidad 10m SLR 90 m DEM /11! 73 ;,„,,,,, / ,„,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, Assessmentof Fland Acceleratin. Rates of Sea Level Rise in Miami Beach { m r,-,-1- "..:- ail-14 I!tt rvk a ypyu � $xc, l:i'4-'::',.- ,:b rur/�. t 21132111- 0111 --- :e 1 -+ a'' Ak..b .int a Yom'•t{ ,e ,.;---4...,---iti ' r-_ a r•� 7 rat Min's:.�r• ' i.t^^R" ,.. -- '.; ,. � S,z# 'i^sa �. _ +�''++V '�" K s. a • .r[RlD�:a 77u z'' :;,...,',+:1 t S3_Z >; �.a .,e',,.; ::11T'^'•'7~ {{X O _- /r�1r[.rf.� ...�. . { . . -..i.. - ) -� -I rir _ ,� lurw a+; 1i ; ta:..,.�. � ads.-. :. � _.,•z ,�. !,11t .r . __- +w�(rJ:.�a t _.333.' � � ,"_ ..,.,.�,Y - 3 ��t ... # •�....J fr ar=i 3� �:'$. k- ,1, ::s.`^,� .._"- � i:. . .. '_ w�ww�J -'!i�$� ; .��R' - i : .. �.:�3� �':.: _._ •x ._ j - x�.I,%:.3'4: �:'.. -_��" �,�. -J' .a�nR J I• t. - ' �3l '': _ ___ ate•,..,;.':::.... ��,ww ~ •wnllll t_ ``:$,,.,�. s-••.:�::::o r,• 'R•J7a 1 - ~•i:'._I- Jrrw�!!.a . •��` �� ..r �'^.nwimj� anr '— - a� r"rwnrerr' "rl�!'Rw' x.:1 rrn a�1E ' -. - as ,_..: :'�' :�_� w �� ,- � «�,a�r .�•. — ,.wr.J�;:; ,ww�aa;; i I. .1:-.i. 'ri t ': -..�s.i--.J� ��.��...w i - _- _ _ '' "3�•- '! iij ; .r � +�'r� iw• �c J�[� Ys+47w.'.L ,�;� ., -., iii - -----=- 1-11 y 1 w+ g Nom.... ?.'. r.�,+� - •-w�!f ,�. „r.• _ �"�'f«< "'fff a ' �1��ite•� /ice .24,-:,_,..... =: :;� �' aid �..+.�. w.w,•• : , r- »i', .., �rw�•i�li•��N�'+` "�' .'-';+;e• • .. ." . ...y�-a• w 7..N N T i .: ::=1„%.,""E„,-.4.4,-, i .wv w.•.. { +.rraam... .J, �Mh ,..w, a/ .. '� 7.,'-'' _.:,'�..K 4 ;�l r.� `+r ...�!tw� .•rlr:+r i1F r v 7 r; .. , ., ? d '- w x.- r• aA• t' ::••_:: ^+"+' 7.11; 40.._ `w...+e l w.� , , ,,,17„,5,/,', rJJ // /,'',1, ti _ L. � as�iJ:Rf•R- _ ;•••.:~ rr�rw/ E+r�Jlll'• ..• '^� 1.,„;,,,.t ''.------- 161g-'- .�j„!'.• �- -.R.. 1,+F .� +w�..A,: � .. - •�w� R_..I.f / a h 4'''r y r% :�, .-,,, :: .,.'i' r .'`� ..r',::, ,,, ..' r ".��: ':S/'y •P",��}• �...�. 1.�•tf +w _ lR..pp .,,%rR/,Jr J./ ,W^{'M,:,a ,r.,i ,,r.'/r/r ,r ;,,, / ,Ar..1N ,x;5,,Jrr r!.rY.,:! ,.., ,!f' ': J,Y ,�'W,:: '�r ._ -_'�•{. ^'• Irl,1 q ---;.,.„.e..44.-- .-'- AJ.-Z ,.. .;.... : , „ �y'"'�''�,+;. : /�r� - � Irl�h.r��+�`Z f��/ >�� ' -♦ �Jllr. a '''',,',',/,,,,,,',:,„„./ .R ,; b,! ....-•:::.,.,:,u .::,k,N,r:i, y.. a.,.y / ,!J•a9'"..,/, •+ - M ,vfa ,*,41,7,.4,'',''',;/',;'',,,,-,'",','"''', ,, ..a.,,c,., ";ai�rvrA' !:., /r.f{4" ;'',','t, r,,, .. i a r a r; ^r..fr,,r,..„.., N /. s �.. i� 't---;',''''' ----__ '1t - .. 1,y,,a; r r . JH,,.. ,rr,,,„ m�,�k vru,J+/, .0 al. +'- r" .�'G.'za R,; ', m Y : w•ea r4,', r `kz ad's'^ x9'➢ 'y//!/ " a ,".,.xP ^d ,v, a y". a/ a•....,... o,,, .:;.f .... r!'S w,:;X';r� ay vv:: ,.:.N ...:./e/ ....,.E J /(!r!7d„9 y{v.:. �,: 4 ,;;.:.r r.e„ t r..,;"r r!,y'.. arr .. . YA r1w^�„r �{,,r� + arynya� v,vr� r�� °'C� r>� �yar r r r° � y as J w v EIt J a i”;&fir A{'`'4�"'aa�`�� ',A r �,ca a s H w t x.,.•rx,�a x..r.x^R•.• {, J,r.4.W:x'"'J.vv/r,^a w.,„.W.;;d., •,.,.y,Y,.•,ra .. i., ,u.,/: ”'.aG, 44", .. :,�,{ r�., �:�...,,mJ, r.. v. m,,.n,.,.. /:.,; .,.., ,... n�l�,....':., ,....,w. .. Na.,.xr. a ,. '.... ':,! .,r,,. ., ,.,,..a :,Wm•.�..../ .,.....wr yr :.,...1�,,.',,r v..t. .,m,v'::w„.o.. v,.:.. ., .. .. „�, .. ...Z B A/ ... . . ... ..,..,f n.,. " A:,.l.r.,.., ,+f'..,: ,,..N ., ,M.. � /„ ., / �.,J ,:r...,... r ,.... ! H�,,..4 .,,,,,;.�, ,� '?""'.., /.« N'/.. .. z r,.,......,..rf.,.z/r.... rxe:�:-„.,r. ,� .„.m,v, r:....,...,, ..,., ,. .vn J a .. ... .....ti ,/4 ,,..,.".,.. r. >N',v .,,Y..x...../.,. .,/ ..,w,._rrYs"J. / ! ,„ .. � ./:,r.,,,.,./ r ,nP ..,./.Sr r.r�,...: „:,,P n .4.... ,.,ws .::...,,, r .v...� ....,.. ; ,.. .I.;f;/r n/!.".. rX .r�. ,.,rr �..,,r. X.,. .x.,.a".. r'."7 .�..r ..... ... .... .n..... ..,.„,..a, :,,,, ..,., ,•.k ak':�v%b�vr . x �d. ,'..r�.✓ .. ..�rY/,../„au.. „ ,.,rz o/..., ,. .,,.,r,Y,� .... ... .. .. ... ..,.. .,.„r,.z„ �” ',• �, M„..F."4�.:,, ,`v .. Ay,.c.,..,, .., � ,,..,,.>a.,/!;n� �..:.r, :'. r SY.,.. �'i,../XµW. .'Y-,�Ix.., .��,.... :� w r, ..4r,1411;;;',;', ..J .5....�... .u.... ..r, �. ....,. �.r. _.. .� x,W✓_w, ,,„.,,,. „r'�k,+.y",n:�v.r .,�/i a ,.9. , .. ,. .'y vy!n.6, , �.�"S R 9�`£�. r ,. ,� ... n, .��r ,.,R. :,, ,•., �. ,;:",4'. •:r:,.W:� �' -'r ,a1'4,� .q.,n....•, nr ,:,. f .,r ,..,. ��/. ,. `, .r x. ��:., /�,.:,.s/� w, M..vv/F ,��;:'h�!�N '',ry. �•xr..�,.,•:x w / r.r o.x.. :,k'^ ,r", r.,A.a.G,.x,ya,:.'?�•b:,„9r/J /, .ya,YGri/.:.:.� :.rr r,', ,nn,J�;4" ,v.,1`•:..",v`: ... .�. . ,.;r .,..� ,.. ..�•.,,r:•: :. ,jj X r m ,T. yaraY �: ry 5. ,.4, �,N:....r W.I. ,./Sr...a f.... �. _ Y. . .., �,..'. w r.x, 5 ,��,:�,. Y3�,.✓: ,a.. ..,... .7.. /:/C'%:,....�' .e,kA n.M• a•' ,r 5 n.,^y.. ... '..� rrn,.. .. . . .x ..x. ..r...". , .k...3', ..... ,.,. a'u,A� �f,,� r,,r.,.fir:' r'-..r: '4 '' IIr .a.Y,r a y,.r�.. .. ... .�.. ?P.., -. .. .... .,^. r� ,./.'v„y ,.,"'Y,:-. x .•,. x r .y4.,,..h, a , ,x,!„',H m,+,�., .. , .. :..i•.„ w.a x ... .,.n.. a.,. .....,n•".. nG z A ', R' r:i., „�mo5:sr 4 �.,5,>",r,.•r. .y�. y. ,,„.,� HYo ..., ,, a.�� . ,.wtn,.. ^;,'r.b'" �. ^f a,:xb,ro.�,�Ekw;,, .�,��'/„„ v G,a z. r.o a.Cl: �.,.a. •.� .. 9 v as ., .... ,. , . „byres,., .,r� �':M, .a A4 na M nub'.. /•�': ,, n � m a�/C,a r ,:., ,Pbt� r;r,.a.y� � ra�. m.v.{�.�. z i M. G� .................. ,..., .�..r..a /.,�... .. :l{i m� .,,..�.,,.,..,^v,,,., .:, 4,.r y� m ,Po�x' �r!; Key Similarities Start Date: 10/2014 Completed: 2/2016 Cost: $572K (Engineering Fee) • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ Firm's Role: Professional Services, Project Management, Sea Level Rise Resiliency Flooding Analysis, Data Collection Modeling Contact Information: • Engineering Studies Reference Contact Name: Peter K.Swart Reference Telephone Number: 305 421-4103 E-mail: pswart@rsmas.miami.edu Project Descption: J FIU Sea Level Solutions Center* staff performed as Project Manager in a study to asses flooding frequency and accelerating rates of sea level rise in Miami Beach. Sea level rise (SLR) imposes an increasing flooding hazard on low-lying coastal communities due to higher exposure to high- tide conditions and storm surge. Additional coastal flooding hazard arises due to reduced effectiveness of gravity-based drainage systems to drain rainwater during heavy rain events.Over the past decade,several coastal communities along the US Atlantic coast have experienced an increasing rate of flooding events. In this study, we focus on the increasing flooding hazard in Miami Beach, Florida, which has caused severe property damage and significant disruptions to daily life. Dr. Wdowinski evaluated the flooding frequency and its causes by analyzing tide and rain gauge records, media reports, insurance claims, and photo records from Miami Beach acquired during 1998-2013. Our analysis indicates that significant changes in flooding frequency occurred after 2006, in which rain-induced events increased by 33% and tide- induced events increased by more than 400%. Dr. Wdowinski analyzed tide gauge records from Southeast Florida and detected a decadal- scale accelerating rates of SLR. The average pre-2006 rate is 3±2 mm/yr, similar to the global long-term rate of SLR,whereas after 2006 the average rate of SLR in Southeast Florida rose to 9±4 mm/yr. The results suggest that Sea Level engineering solutions to SLR should rely on regional SLR rate projections Slu opt Center and not only on the commonly used global SLR projections. Ta b 2 1 • Proioser Qualifications Similar Experience Engineering projects, such as increasing efficiency of drainage systems or erection of seawalls, are typically based on globally average forecasts of SLR. Thus, if local rates of SLR are significantly higher than those of the globally average ones, as observed in Miami Beach, planned engineering solutions will provide protection for a shorter time period than planned. Annual flooding occurrence in Miami Beach between 1998-2013 indicating a significant increase in tide flooding events (green) since 2006. Flooding frequencyg 1 T T I 6 1 T I T I Rain flTide CD alStorm 1 :. 7 . „:„ II • Vc., Q -1—li 1 , 11 —1—li J ..:.L 4„,,,'„,31111 i 0 , II 111 , 2006 200 2010 2014 19.E 6 1997-2: 2002":4000 2�;�� 2012 Time (y ear K 11* 75 d/�//r,4 i/%i/rr/r///% ////// Unified Level Projection for Southeast Florida „. „ rativ114$14"4. :4111re414ri"(74'1* 410«. .�; uW . h • �'4.. Fyaplky'1MM/""Wa ♦, , '^•ww _ ,.,,yn tlx.: `�'' A, 4 M e . ,.",F' o. iv. � r,+ ^,.w,.',1 �r ° ; �'�• � �yyyp`: !µ � rF-' � • moi' Y\� •w.y M( m Via. ! t�►w...x' " w .."”"" + °``° h�a„ A ` Ag, 4411.11, ;F}t Y`Y 4♦ v tl' . ""°i"". �.•!fir '°.,,wwm�"".m••,x,..a•-' ,: .. ....r, . .F' W,4kk \+` Key Similarities Start Date: 10/2014 Completed: 10/2015 Cost: $40K (Engineering Fee) CC/SLR/Adaptation/ Firm's Role:Sea Level Rise and Climate Change Analysis, Data Collection, Resiliency Planning Contact Information: James F. Murley • Engineering Studies Reference Telephone Number: 305-375-5593 Email: James.Murley@miamidade.gov * Professional Experience of Dr. Shimon Wdowinski Project Description: The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact reconvened the Sea Level Rise Work Group for the purpose of updating the unified regional projection based on global projections, guidance documents and scientific literature released since the original regional projection in 2011 (Compact,2011). The objective of the unified sea level rise projection for the Southeast Florida region remains consistent that the projection is for use by the Climate Compact Counties and partners for planning purposes to aid in understanding of potential vulnerabilities and to provide a basis for developing risk informed adaptation strategies for the region. For the 2015 update, the starting point for all sea level rise projections has been shifted from 2010 to 1992. This allows for direct use of local tide station information to convert projections into local water surface elevations for flood vulnerability studies,and is consistent with current guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). The Unified Sea Level Rise projection for Southeast Florida has also been extended to 2100 in recognition of the need for longer range guidance for major infrastructure and other long term investments now being planned. Projected sea level rise, especially by 2060 and beyond, has a significant range of variation as a result of uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions and their geophysical effects, the incomplete quantitative understanding of all geophysical processes that might affect the rate of sea level rise in climate models and the limitations of current climate models to predict the future. As such, the Work Group recommends that the unified sea level rise projection include three curves, in descending Ta b 2 1 • , , . „ „, Pro .oser Qualifications ,,,,,„,..„.„ Similar Expeence order, the NOAA High Curve, the USACE High Curve and a curve corresponding to the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario, with specific guidance as to how and when they should be used in planning. This guidance document describes the recommended application of the projection as it relates to both high and low risk projects and short and long-term planning efforts. Also, the Work Group recommends that this guidance be updated every five to seven years because of the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to global climate change and potential impacts. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection.These projections are referenced to mean sea level at the Key West tide gauge. The projection includes three global curves adapted for regional application:the median of the IPCC AR5 RCP8.5 scenario as the lowest boundary (blue dashed curve), the USACE High curve as the upper boundary for the short term for use until 2060 (solid blue line), and the NOAA High curve as the uppermost boundary for medium and long term use (orange solid curve). The incorporated table lists the projection values at years 2030, 2060 and 2100. The USACE Intermediate or NOAA Intermediate Low curve is displayed on the figure for reference (green dashed curve). This scenario would require significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in order to be plausible and does not reflect current emissions trends. Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) 70 IPCC AR5 t .,.... USACE High NOAA High LA Year Median (inches) (inches) (inches) >. ro :7...) T., 2030 6 10 12 flc2, 4u 2060 14 26 34 a > 81 > 2100 31 61 + 30 26" -'" L I'- 3,J+")• e't'k F",r„' >ii �� r- v r,I�o 14 r 4 i /r -ii .IMr - w +--- 10cc --- ./" -..„w-- USACE Intermediate/NOAA%nterined ate Low ,nx• �nw 0 992 2000 201 2020 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 Year 1)! 77 ,„„,„,,/ .... i"/,/„„„/„„� e Contribution of L to the Increasingazardin Miami Beac ., ,, , , , ,...,,.4 tr. .. , ,• ., , k ft 14 ..„, fs, , ..... ,1/4„.. ,, ... .,,,. .4„. 4 -,r, �°8 , ,,,,1„-; a. a %,, � � ,� '' « ' . '4-.. � * . 3 ger` t -2 :, x .o..'+Ad 'it', r� �a +leq » K <t';',,,,', yy ky b S h:R,d L,6 . ki H' :xCN. .L 0. ^'' Ti Y d d t, '” q :.. • . .,.. ,,.... ='� aM .vat y, �'”.,7,7'''''...'"�,J�� Y" �� t '? aa�g��.•.N5' qtr r 4 » r'<a%t^.w -':' 1 L.^, t•':�x-0f ;;�A'M W � R .id '.. ar ;�xa,x';:; ,.M y. -''4**.. «"w'. .,4i;‘,""'*,,,;, aF:; xt.,'�2 ' r.r.f :K. ., Y �'r''i ,17 M 4 d'S k,3 f - •''."Y .,r:t ,:,,,,,,77,„,,„,,,,,,,k�F Y'..,04 k $ ;f' ,„ 1ppiy: yL .K"�xG. .,,F.+k`�'y A5'. H Y--,411-4,T, x,xx p,..a, Yf"', ,,'":-,,,,,v-74,— W 'd" 2+Y °' ,,,,..-47, -.':— ' py,,�. :.:�w 1, '% r x '� .. ... -. <'avro �,oa .vd�` dae p0k8 ', �F ,,,.': . W �. "�!', - 7: '-' a,x.,:_, ix f;, ,�.c 9'E w' .q. - R ,hf � ''�`YmYw x a „�dAA�@, 3"S^" X°�+FxYy�.. '�'T f: — ' "'",,,,',,,--;:-,7'7;"417„:,,,,,,,:.?:"',; "*.:.— _ ... -_fL''''",-7,*—Y J �i 8 ',,—,-,'" , ',/-4 4' ' ,--IP , _ ..:^:;':. < .;. .'., .•.;:.,¢M r.I..:, .,..,„ ,". ,a..-.a .,,r, '..Cvs" .. 4re �,eh +' vc Key Similarities Start Date: 04/2016 Completed: On-going Cost: $180K (Engineering Fee) • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ Firm's Role:Sea Level Rise and Climate Change Analysis, Data Collection, Resiliency Planning Contact information: Rene Price • Engineering Studies Reference Telephone Number: (305) 348-3119 Email: pricer©fiu.edu * Professional Experience of Dr. Shimon Wdowinski Project Descption: South Florida is one of the most vulnerable areas to Sea Level Rise (SLR) due to its low elevation, large population concentration, and economic importance. Heretofore, the effect of SLR has felt mostly in low-lying coastal communities, such as the City of Miami Beach. A recent flooding hazard study of Miami Beach have shown a significant increase in flooding frequency after 2006, in which the flooding frequency increased by 400% compare with flooding events during the previous decade (Wdowinski et al., 2016). The study managend by Dr. Wdowinski attributed the flooding frequency increase to a decadal-scale accelerating rates of SLR that occurred most likely due to the weakening of the Gulf Stream. However, some of the increased flooding frequency might have caused due to local land subsidence. In this study, Dr. Wdowinski evaluated the contribution of land subsidence to the flooding hazard of Miami Beach using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) observations. The team analyzed 23 ERS-1/2 p images acquired during the period 1993-1999 using InSAR time series techniques. Preliminary results yield localized subsidence at a rate of 2-3 mm/yr, mostly along the western section of the city. The subsiding areas correlate well with the areas that were built on reclaimed swamps. Although the detected subsidence velocities are quite low, their effect on the flooding hazard is significant, because (1) houses originally built on higher ground have subsided since the city was built, about 80 years :--0---11- '4,7 1 - 1 Leat g ago, by 16-24 cm down to flooding hazard zones; and (2) the combined ..5) t4ttons Cente`, effect of subsidence and SLR further expose the subsiding areas to higher flooding hazard than the rest ofthe city. 78 ! r ,,„0?,,/,' „, .,/,„,/,,,,,,,,„,„,,,,,,,,,,, , , , Ta b 2 • 1 re• derQualifications Similar Experience : :II -1444 N r .1/4,... 4. .. A ,. . , , ....\ •tr4 -. , „.,„. . , ..,P *44 ••• \\ .• • • . ,.t. ' , �M .4"s 4i" "' . jeele•• sis : .. t*.r " %est ••7 , fttiArt • i i' • "' i''' . • , •i • • • • i4e *.. .?i* . 46 •• ofr' , * . I. .•*0. IritAt. • • • • tt•Pl • *\•'\n • • w,►y'} • •J • -4 02 1 ,e;;;.: vi *1.• , Vertical Velocity ;3* •,*, :*. (mm/Yi, .. L ob. 4;c `, `• i.., • —7 — —5 15 se,'4,t:h.4,-, -- ,,,4*4s 1 1I ,;., ... • -5 - -3 �,w,.•d. .. ..fir 1 5 it. "'tet ` • +�" •• ' �' -3 - -1 .5 . ► . • . ' ,,'` ,�� . • . 45# 1 1•• •• 4,, .. 1.5 2 4*.• 2 - 5 �s • .* • T' P • +. • senti • �•s•i • ,off' • • + ,►,, •� ••• ♦ • i• •,�, :' • • . ♦0 r'±+ • .,.* 1.0 • .rte .►trt:w..., iit, • ?..„ • • y %It•41 5! .:• . 4 ik .,.T.4_ . • aft.titie .4.... ...0 • , ifr... . .‘ 4,,, ••tb•Ind +; *0 •• • • ., \40•44. . tt•,,, )ilb:1 \,\ \, 4 ,-. I %*4): .,,ts,., \%,':%,,.*k4itig •• • •• '• OP ATI% 1,..*, • t Ilett 44. '<* tv, Vertical velocity maps of the Miami • . .� Beach area obtained with the PS o Nimmilimillir----1 Km misimmi==Km technique using 22 (a) and 23 (b) ERS-1/2 images. 1! 79 i ,,, NYCEP Assessmentof Iwith Grade 5 Pipe Index ... , , , , , . , ,„ ; ° , . ,.. ,,, ,,, A,,..,1., ,a , , 4. , , , J V w Iliket :I!' r w �" ro �f ' :.,, box» 'w.• .r � :.r ,t4 A, R .., � »....7;*- � A '4 -. :'P .. H h F 4. u. ^ �! '" ti •, r Oariiii**'.4114#6,44-** „.r. ... ......r rS'''.3f.: q 4am,5^ �� 'Ea � 3 .. F A �� s - * ' ,., •:, ' , ,1 ---7, - , - _ , , F a yy '2• ... A. { f A Ke Similarities Start Date: 2011 Completed: 2012 Cost: $56M (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Assessment of Intercepting Sewers with Grade 5 Pipe Index Contact Information: Ronald Lochan, P.E., Chief Systems Reference Telephone Number: 718-595-4724 • Water Pump Stations Reference Email:jfebrizio@longbeachny.gov • Corrosion Control and Remediation Project Descption: • Water and Wastewater The New York City Environmental Protection (NYCEP) is responsible for the Master Planning operation of the City's 14 Water Pollution Control Plants (WPCP) located throughout New York City. Pursuant to their State Pollution Discharge • Engineering Studies Elimination System (SPDES) Permits, 13 of these plants must control wastewater and storm water discharges. Throughout the New York City sewer system, significant lengths of interceptors were identified as having structural defects and could possibly fail within the next 5 years. This project assessed and identified corrective actions to address structural deficiencies and diminished capacity. D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) reviewed over 40,000 feet of CCTV tape of interceptors in 11 sewersheds throughout the City, and as-built drawings for selected segments of the interceptors in the Port Richmond, Rockaway and Hunts Point service areas. D&B assessed the internal condition based on the procedures detailed in the NASSCO's Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP). D&B determined that the common structural defect seen in these sewer segments was corrosion of the sewer fabric above the normal flow level. The defects ranged from surface corrosion to exposed rusted rebar. &B developed a methodology to rank the segments from "worst” to "least" defects for the purpose of prioritizing rehabilitation/reconstruction actions. D&B's analysis prioritized 13,500 linear feet of interceptors in the Port Richmond West Interceptor, Rockaway East Interceptor and Hunts Point Interceptor for rehabilitation. iii"' D&B evaluated Sliplining, Cured-in-Place-Pipe (CIPP), Lining with Pipe and In Situ Coating to rehabilitate the interceptors. Other factors taken into consideration when evaluating rehabilitation methods for the interceptors 80 Tab 2 . 1 • ,„ .:,, ,, oser Qualificattons Similar Expeence New York City include the interceptor size, flow, shape, access and location. Based on these factors and the structural defects found, D&B recommended that CIPP for pipe diameters of 48 inches or less and gunite and epoxy coating for the larger pipes. Based on the recommended rehabilitation methodology D&B developed rehabilitation costs for 30,000 linear feet of interceptors within the 11 sewersheds. .,,‘„„A\\\,„,,,1h,,,,,NN,,,Sp\\\ti\\\•\\\W\\\,...,—„,„\\,,N,,.\\\\\\\\:\\\H\r....\\,,,,,,,,,„,..h\,,M,,,,.,,,\,..\y\ \,wr,,,:..;-,,k,\o.is ,,,;:..a,: "s).;\ y h'•µ ; Y !4/IM,p,,,,,,r 451. r+° .y/rear//k n/r • m �. « 4 a ''' , of, ,A11111k, ' 110.t4 v, 'I/ '',7 ' i 'wi'74 r•° r iie - n _. , , .4,?,. 0 t .., ,; 6 , ,,,,, 4, , , ,,, _ , 4 -. ' - ,i,,,, , , , ,, „„ ic, *1 ,,/,„;(7;//44,,,,; ,,,,, a e 1,.., , , M , . , / 'N N "”' " ** ilk i: ' 4vir,04- -- / 4< Y e.p ,A '/5� 'M 11/4 , , Y� yev '''' '"i':::::41,,,i'1;4,:iii41,f,';41:'' f 5 ,"q/l ny fol/��/7 /Y� NN/ Mn , ` "N SPI Ito. . � / M i" .'A �+ 9 / firi ] n: eg ? '.i",.,v .1.,'' Ma . . .. 5 �,� N kr • ,! , Y ' './, ,:•....:, ..,. � / ,r.. � '� H )�4J � '/� k /f / , , • , wg6//+ // i ''''. i5� H/ ' a �aCbwn4,. ;1' ,,,,,,,,,,,,„ , , " . d ! rr r . y/u ! / /1�r uwlo,nWi � u/�/ . - �k /:» ��/b¢ �� 9 .P �t u � H/ yp. „ n Nr. •• ,.,' 4 • . ,*49."'""-'''' - 'j'Aig: ,".......,. •'/4�4.'•!/i,5 w,`/is/H 7/i/•//.G!:�"//////H 5Rd5.k /. 5/ „/u,//// i.,////'xY•/7r////„Y /„•N///I/// ;:, /;/ ,V H:./ s r r / y: 41! 81 , „„, ///,/ N/„/ �//#/4„..(.//////,1r/ �/J/,J r.,,h; IfqJl/4i* ' % in,..ir;''JJ r<�/�y7417 /;�G4/�%�/J/'//4 ��%Jr . qi/l/ , / . /.,/ r/ir�!i/r�yq//N, i„1/4o,// r-. / J / „ ,,,,,,4„,„/, . ,. „/ ,,,/,, , „/ City of 0 ng Beac New York Avenue Pumping Station . uIi1 / S;` ; / :: ' •. i. ^a;;%;: J �;;V�, ry: , kry' , ,, �`x, .;o. k Sr.z,,;5 r & , J y; �4 , � / , ,o, f yJ /:l7'.14;414:: ;,/ r/,r„,-.4. I 11”, a- 1 ',r/v ii ,fr Y+�h/11111 � .,,;,*,;,;14$1.0404w, , ,I ey17,..'"://A, }y ,. s� ry -,,x/:,:$0/ „x/ /r” vivir.%s:b G,7,9,Gys•:'d,, ;Y * "4', W 0 C- '/4,',/,:"$,,,,,I ��A ,, 'N ,MSr ryr i isst4 i .,,, a< ,i/ , Jnr � w _. I ��"�� e;Jr 6 / ri h/�prJ� "of r J /I'i`i"i:,‘,',14, J4r�r''r�sY, m4 rHn i r�h/i,, 6 j 4 ,,i/,� ,n s,h�, $y 1 :, , !yf r, %r4 r ! nrrr r'f9 f, 7 i i '/ / y N�„ it „/;: rr f�lt, g /� � iJ y /F��ry/'y�r :,,,,* /� ��/ B41/ J%�/ J iM'I' /%�'Ni�/ It. Pi' n:w1 JN /G. /"u d D`idJ' ru st'4' ' ar 4' n ry // //rr1//JrS d'aJ J JI DANGER.„, , I,It!too' i " l' CONFINED r1� , ' SPACE „�.. ' 3 k � � J4 t� 3 r� / J , 4 :4 r,,,,,,4� /ti 4S ,., e&op.•,Rf .. tS J ,i„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SfYrh,' �J i,rz! ::r/J hR'� y tx r ,/ r �, Vit. f7' �M1 'a 4i Is/bre drJr r JJAyrini�rJ`x� 9y/° / J yJJ, Key Similarities Start Date: 2009 Completed: 2011 Cost: $2.2M (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Pump/Lift Firm's Role: Pump stations rehabilitation, Code compliance study and report, Grinder systems, SCADA controls, Wet pit submersible pumps, Stations Corrosion protection/lining, Start-up, By-passing pumping Contact • Wastewater Collection Information: Joseph Febrizio Design Reference Telephone Number: 516-431-1000 Corrosion Control and Reference Email:jfebrizio@longbeachny.gov • Remediation • Engineering Studies Project Descption: D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) was retained by the City of Long Beach (the City) to evaluate and rehabilitate the New York Avenue pump station. The station consists of two dry pit shaft mounted pumps rated for 1,500 gpm at 25 feet TDH, 25 Hp. The dry pit and the associated valving were installed in a tight, confined chamber. D&B recommended a radical approach to improve the station's operation and eliminate the maintenance nuisances created by installing the dry pit pumps and valves fifteen feet below grade in concrete structure. D&B converted the station to a wet pit station and designed two wet pit submersible pumps to replace the dry pit pumps and designed a valve room that was easily accessible and less constrained. Other station improvements included by-pass pumping using above- grade self priming pumps, force main by-pass tee, new wet well corrosion lining,installation of a grinder system,new MCC,HVAC,controls,generator, transfer switch, louvers, doors. db 82 1 2 . 1 �• Qualifications Pro •alar Similar Experience ,,, , ,,,,„,„..„,.,....4. . . „,, ,... ,_ ., .‘, ,., ,, \ ,,t,,,,),,,\L,0401,, ,,, ,,\., ... ,• ,ate , , il i':,•,,t.---r ' * :, i".\;1,-,,,,,...:.„... 2 -;-- :‘, 0, ,;;!„,i,,,,,,, , " \ cul/¢/m/nr/yp ^ yam i.: 4 94 .'1/ ... ....‘,474,;;;',,',.... Sxi0,d ' W\LW�ta \\,,;,,,,,`. i ...\W�d Ylclu a „ X.' ,\F 4e6y.WLF .;.ra.mmw+.ws ,; —"I”' ' xa 7 ., „ .. . , , ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, .,,,. . „ . !'l , ., . , ,,.., , ' r „ ' w to ‘\'‘ ,',44/74.,;',,,,.,,,,,''''''''''' ' ''''4V, '',,,j7e,,,,,;./11 7" '-,...,'''''li -_, '.',,,,,,',,. N."All ;;,, , Y/xfb/qup 0877 y�A''' ;w7�i/19v,`xi•" wow ,. Sy. xx�,x.,n.. Ili i c. Y .wv • --it if .1 0 .‘ ---,—I ‘ „F ..„.,. ... D I ,,,., :: ,....„,...,.._...... '. .. ,, Y om. „.-7,......... i .. i': , ,—,... ...,.,,, S r, ` r,.: 1!° Alli t ,, 1 83 H / '#1'///,//,/i�/�//� y/.../i:rr $4/ Or o/nb'aq/r/i.ui;1///:;/,' //y;tri////41144/1"f/ //' /, r /o„[/i p/ /i /: t r rr '1;1//"/ Assetof New York City DeDepartment of EFacilities & Infrastructure , ,,,,,.4 2/ P , /,/- ,,,,, . , . ,f,„,,,,„,, . ,... r /,7 , /4 4,,,,,„4,, . .,. _ a/ , * ,,,,, y , ,,,,,,,, . ,*,4, 4 _ ,,,,, -, , , -Yr : , ,- ori- _ - /�Y// ,/,,,,;,,/,:„„ 4 f, ,/ „, .0,40.4 - /% 7 fa : % /�Ya r i%`��j'/'�i>y✓y//Y �yq. d /r %'''4, "/f�F/,{rr,„,of,Aslit,,rVis.9 a "/": ,,y la is, i' � //i/jir // t� M � J p 4% f y , `�5 /fir a ; h / / � � ,11714. t , , 0 , ,/,'r/r ', rI 4 ro il , .41 ',/' 111-1,ray / 5.` y. `., yp0 ,A0 q� r / J R 1m, t II' a r o � ! e. � y fp�� 8 4 f` ��s �vu fi y.z/�' , 4'yU�. , y�;:e..QJ ::WS /,.. xtS. `,' tt : �1 , / , b yy, ' / implip •Y . a a � .. F / V/'r" .A: / Pxfi P .kms :moi'';4 IN �'° i:: _ #10 00 44 4' ,41/100101111 Key Similarities Start Date: 10/2009 Completed: 12/2012 Cost: 5M. $5 (Engineering Fee) ( g g • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Asset Management of NYCDEP Facilities and Infrastructure • Wastewater Collection Contact Information: Jason Galea Reference Telephone Number: 718-595-5584 Systems Email:jasong@dep.nyc.gov • Water Pump Stations • Wastewater Pump/Lift Project Descption: Stations D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) recently conducted in a Risk • Water and Wastewater Assessment, Prioritization and Asset Management (RAPAM) project for the NYCDEP to evaluate all of the agency's wastewater, water supply, Master Planning roads, bridges, and other infrastructure where the total assets numbered • Engineering Studies more than 250,000. D&B provided most of the field investigations and also • Cost Estimating / participated in the data analysis, comparisons, and final determination of asset criticality. The size of this project is unusually large in comparison Scheduling to many other municipalities, where the typical quantity may range from hundreds to thousands of assets. The purpose of this project was to create a comprehensive and sustainable asset management program. The product of this exercise was to develop a list of fundable projects for inclusion in current Capital Improvement Plans, as well as in future plans. This particular project required extensive coordination with our client's design and operating bureaus and management departments. The various deliverables and benefits of this type of RAPAM work are depicted graphically below. The first step in the process included creating an inventory of all assets by identifying, locating and cataloging them. This was followed by an assessment of each asset's physical condition, which focused on each asset's major attributes, as well as; historical maintenance and service/ operating conditions. Based on standard accepted asset management criteria, scores were assigned to each asset. A physical inspection was f,,,,///,„//,c:II undertaken for most assets where feasible. Once the physical condition f„ was determined, its performance condition was rated. The performance of an asset relates to its operational requirements now and in the future. The final step in the rating process involved the identification of the asset's criticality,which reflects the importance of a particular asset to the overall 84 Tab 1 2 . 1 Pro •eser Qualifications Similar Expenence system/facility if failure were to occur. For both performance and Optimize criticality alike, assets were scored based on a set of predetermined Investmentslifcleand criteria decided upon by both D&B and the client. After the physical Two,r�,- cost Protect the condition, performance condition, and criticality were scored, each Optimize Environment O&M expenditure and public health asset was ranked and prioritized. An asset risk score was determined by adding the scores from the physical and performance condition Ensure a intergenerational Asset Serve stewasrdsgood assessments and multiplying that number by the criticality score. This equity and Management of public assets responsibility method allows significant weighting of criticality to affect the results. For this particular project, assets were scored on a scale from 1 through 5 for Practice efficient Ensure long-term both its physical condition and its performance condition scoring, and business sustainability management Deliver defr its criticality rating was scored from 1 through 3.A risk score of 1 reflected service levels to customers and a perfect or close to perfect scenario while the highest score triggers regulators concern. A typical scoring scenario is shown below: The example above shows that the loss of the treatment plant's influent pumping system is more critical than an Physical Equ: Performance Criticality Risk Score* Condition Sludge Transfer Pump System 2 3 2 10 Plant Influent Pump y System 2 2 3 12 *Risk Score = (Physical ± Performance)x Criticality internal sludge pump. This is true since the loss of the influent pumping system would cause sewer backups and flooding upstream as well as allow raw sewage to overflow without treatment. While this conclusion may seem obvious, many of the needed improvements cannot be identified as straightforward and do require this type of analysis to compare the urgency of possible alternate repairs/replacements.The risk score for the assets will then be used to guide the Capital Improvement Program by ensuring that the highest priority projects are the first to be addressed. Once the risk scores are assigned and prioritized, projects can be created or bundled for future implementation. Project bundling is advantageous in scenarios where similar scores for the same type of asset are found. For example, if it is found that all sludge transfer pumps are receiving high risk scores, then we will develop a project that will address the pumps as a group rather than addressing each pump individually to save both time and funds.To assist in the process, full construction cost estimating including debt service, and annual O&M costs was undertaken. To help our client with future needs we will develop a system that will store all of the data gathered throughout the project, including, physical condition, performance condition and criticality scores. Doing so will allow our client to efficiently manage their assets in the future with limited assistance from an outside consultant if they desire. Lastly, we trained our client's staff to maintain and update the risk assessment, prioritization, and asset management program on their own. This type of project is vital for maintaining our client's facilities in good working order in order to ensure protection of public health and attain protection of the environment. Knowing the condition of a community's assets offer its residents and future residents a look into their future safety and reliability as well as providing for a stable tax base without the need for continual emergency repairs. 85 ,04Yy%/// *41/4"0'4' ,h�r� /, /, /,%r,/i, /r rr/�irp//11,0'''''.°' /. ��//r1/.r/ /h��i'/�//1/ q, 4��4�/�/�irr//i//Lri�, //�/�GI/�a, f;,� r%41�,, d/Ni//m.;.q//////�b., ////0' General E Philadelphia Water Department / , , . . +' ��\ �� >�'$. . .. s. a4 74 ly � Z A d,, ad .E q\y? d.. ..i,., -n- - . --•. • 8 R , y ' SMF w - .: M a, Key Similarities Start Date: 2003 Completed: Current Cost: $3.45M (Engineering Fee) • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Sewer and water main construction base plans, Sewer and • Wastewater Collection water main design (detailed plans and specifications), Lining rehabilitation of sewers, ADA curb ramp design Systems Contact Information: Mr. Michael Lavery • Water Pump Stations Reference Telephone Number: 215-380-2379 • Wastewater Pump/Lift Reference Email: michael.lavery@phila.gov Stations • Water Distribution Design Project Descnption: • Wastewater Collection D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) has been providing general engineering services for PWD since 2003 and have completed many Design sewer reconstruction, water main relay and green stormwater design • Water and Wastewater projects. In addition, D&B provided management assistance in improving Master Plannin the delivery of capital projects. g • Engineering Studies • Sewer and Stormwater Reconstruction Project: Preparation of contract • Cost Estimating / documents for sewer reconstruction projects totaling over 20,500 feet Schedulin g of 18 to 48 inch pipe. Estimated Construction Cost$7,362,000. • Water Main Relay Design: Preparation of contract documents for water main relay projects totaling over 39,500 feet of 6 to 36 inch sewer. Estimated Construction Cost$9,555,000. • Stormwater Green Streets Work: Preparation of contract documents for six green stormwater infrastructure projects capturing runoff from 8.5 drainage acres. Estimated Construction Cost$3,005,000 • Stormwater Swales: As part of PWD's "Storm Flood Relief" Project, D&B designed two large stormwater infiltration swales and sewer system to back flow control runoff from a 22 acre drainage basin. D&B r cmil prepared the conceptual and final design including all associated permit applications, erosion and sedimentation control design, and I. i supplemental review of the green infrastructure O&M manual and I as- built drawings. 86 Tab 2 . 1 . . u_. _µw.__1. ... . _ . .._ . Pro.oser Qualifications Supplemental Project • CSO Inflow Analysis along Cobbs Creek: Conducted site inspections and inflow analysis to determine if CSO outfalls are contributing flow into the interceptors during storm events and providing recommendations for control into CSO structures. The Cobbs Creek Interceptor System has 35 CSO sites distributed along seven miles of creek bed. • Distribution System Optimization Program: Lead PWD with the implementation of the AW WA Partnership for Safe Water Distribution System Optimization Program. Deliverables included project task and schedules, preparation of technical memorandums, drafting the first year's base line report, assisting PWD with the program audits and adjustments in the capital improvement program. Unexpected benefit developed younger staff to acquire knowledge of senior staff as a result of D&B management approach. • Implementation of Capital Improvement: Assisted to optimize the Capital Program by aligning Design, Construction,Conveyance and Collector activities to develop a more efficient process for leading a complex project through Design, Construction, startup and successful operation by the Collector or Conveyance group. The Management Team reviewed the results of several successful projects applying a critical review of change order, cost, quality and time extensions, startup issues and customer opinion.The Team evaluated their role in these projects and identified performance gaps and worked out procedures to improve. • Update Sewer Standard Details and Specifications - Provided general engineering services to assist the Design Banch in updating the 1985 Standard Details and Specifications for Sewers. Complete evaluation of all details for standard components of PWD water main, sewer and stormwater conduit construction taking into account latest advances in materials and construction techniques.Complete review and update of the 2011 Water and Sewer Design Manual.Developed website for Design Manual at 'www.phillywaterdesign.org' by converting and enhancing the Water and Sewer Design Manual to an electronic version that provides more accessibility to Design's protocols and requirements. 87 //N//in rya//r/i//Y%Kr ! -:dr..:'i.u:i';'01, /::;: a ,+9u�7,////1/////1/%1�%r/%//Nm//rn.�/:nq r /i) r q / g py' ,„h• !e/_ r.,.n �. 1 /, .....,,.,. a/:.//. ,,onn/n N///d//�I �� /i// >r;,,,/iN///i1///h,il ��/"//1/r !��/�� // / /�/r/ ��,�..,9(. /9,//r/�//ri�Nyln/!'%r', ';, ,,!/ ,,.��//�//�/,��/.,, ,ii !/r� nrri:�1�//r��iir/bN err„rrr.,,/i..) n ras ruc ure eHcaIiiara a esDrainage ((4 ,. , & GIS U .date Phase Yet F� r�„1N: .f/F'q�/�d F i!7/ / 'W r ,,,,,,011:, y,�Q' 7 � 2 4 9/7/ o! // )i1; ^NP — , 10**./ l'i,. 4 1 1 'rliii:'ir ,,,,t,,: ., ;or NI ; 4 ''it, , a 4ay g�c d1 n”4 nr y! /r��/�g � i + u P "2 M m : AONa 4 k X k ' 11111111111 A p9 )4 i 3 maimilik* ii, tar , , \4 a ze ..,,.,..;.. ^, a„ M/.,,. 1 /A f, ,,,,,, , ,,::::, ,,'.: //Y i .r:nq:F•ry :ww n �,.GG ppn. . .. r.' I :...n): •/7rr 1. '`:' '., F ;.: :. ,.. Key Similarities Start Date: 2016 Completed: 12/2016 Cost: 90K (Engineering Fee) $ • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Field verification of the City's storm sewer infrastructure and S stems GIS digitization y Contact Information: Jorge Acevedo PE, ENV SP, LEED Green Associate • Wastewater Pump/Lift Reference Telephone Number: 305-460-50061 Stations E-mail: JAcevedo2@coralgables.com • Engineering Studies Project Description: J The City of Coral Gables (City) owns, maintains, and operates a storm sewer collection, drainage and discharge systems, including lift stations, slab covered trenches, French drains, and outfalls. In addition,the City maintains a GIS Database which includes the drainage infrastructure owned by the City. This database does not contain all the infrastructure and/or shows infrastructure that is not built. 300 Engineering field verified the storm sewer drainage infrastructure included in the project area which is approximately 28,000 LF of roadway. The field verification was limited to aboveground visual inspection only. One of the main goals was to create guidelines to be followed for future areas until the entire the City (Drainage) is verified. 300 Engineering walked the 28,000 LF of roadways to field verify the existence of stormwater infrastructure mark up,the observed infrastructure and using a GPS Trimble Unit marked up manholes and catch basins. In addition, an inspection navigating a boat was performed to locate existing outfalls discharging into the City's waterways within the project boundaries. The newly found infrastructure was digitized in GIS to update the city's database. Approximately, 50% of the infrastructure recorded was not included in the existing Stormwater GIS database. Furthermore, a mobile application was developed for the City. The methodology and output used to create the City of Coral Gable's IIIP Stormwater Features Database and Mobile Application initiative were as ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. C follows: 88 Ta b 2 1 • Pro•oser Qualifications Supplementall Project Methodology: • Field GPS Collection with Trimble Geo 7x • GIS Data Processing Methods with Trimble Terraflex and ArcGIS Solutions • Quality Review Methods -Spatial Review -Attribute review - Photo Review - Data Recollection -Metadata -Web/Mobile Application Development Results: • Feature Counts-including coordinates and digital photos of all features • Quality Reviews-Spatial Consistency, attribute consistency, attribute accuracy • Stormwater Drainage Features Application for Smartphones, Tablets, and Desktops The City of Coral Gables benefited from this initiative in several ways: The City received a complete inventory of assets in an easy to use and maintain format • The data is accurate and appropriate for analyses and modeling • Provide information to developers, contractors, engineers as part of the utility coordination process to avoid damage to the City's drainage infrastructure during construction • The stormwater drainage mobile application will allow city staff and contractors to manage their data on the field.This will significantly increase efficiency in maintenance on work order management, life cycle costing, flood loss reductions, and spill hazard reductions. • Finally, it will allow city staff, resident, and visitors to view and assess the stormwater drainage features in the City of Coral Gables. ,, a ``\0u\\W\\\k\l\\\;\d:,d\tt\a\\\,i\\\G\\uhP41\e,Y\\6S (a\uia\:0A\S\\\.\\W\,arae\\\u`ik,\u:.1a\\kq\?\\h\r'\\\\k\\\\`\\1`a\\\4\W1\Q\rA1\\\\\\\C2,\\\Jdk\aW\\\\\\1,)Whiu\\h\1\u\,ay,a\.a\2A\\\\. 1 .2 HSectionF ra ..... tiro "�`'''' -`fir ; ' 4)4. _ ., v. �r is *"*".:•t ''''4" N rr k.Lei . \\ \k\tr sf,;:" y u A,q.. +/ ".. ... ., 2 s";:ii-,:.'.**,,,,,. it, J Hsu\ vtmQ\\\\ �\' /„... iW., ." „•.t ' 0, .a , "*—t.'" .hyo ''. bbl"' , .:\ y .,,...._. w. 4 x,A. , w st � a IL'' J 1111, fg ' ' w M" "y "r � _'1,,,a,,,,, _ r.',-1100 � � �.' � t or 't "I "7,1 ., Section 4 ;' 1 - 1- le 4.„.....1) , ..: 't i-t.- ,4").---i,14,4„:'.--- .4 _7 ' *''ii,4,,, iiir ,....0 r314... - _.„....„,,,,, ,„,3 , '74,,, 7, _ , ,. ,,,,,... , _ , , 4 . iii i „ , ,,,...jo y .0104,4404 : 41* °'ilit 4 et- -111 ' `Lr-Y,It, ,?:,,,,,i4H-'44 ',.• it w yy .,„ .,„ , , ”-*4 ,, ir lilt, i,,lei, sm. � 4 4 N \ r.rr 4 yfit. Q J wr_. _ ::- -1-t-- ‘‘ _ -*--„,„g--,e.,, _ .ayie n NN if,J FH J 4)4 . fi , , _it._ iiii , --A, - k i',,, ,.... Ir- , _ 1 e�. s i �ry ,x- _ r , ti/. 0 w , WAIF?"' - " ,-I - - n i 1 ft 1 4 - '- -..., - i lir Air ,..- -: '4- ,,, ' 7 .11:4 ' -. , --I' 89 a;Zi r.,;. ,.....,r:..MV„,.; !:Ii '' , l� // yyp /p.Nr.d,:;/• r ,,/,'H...%/,/.!r H�//�/j,�./../....,,;.rgPr.�°7,/y//ay!.%7q/�// ///n,. ',/.r;1r///�:�/•/ //411,;: , National of SReport on Everglades Restoration ��rm••r w' > a .,.'. ......,.,. ;;... •• '��°��p •,��'"Y" aruiH mr%"�///Hw////'7//� .. (�'x'`y4(C i:a4r,w �� .a 0.4.44 '� - � .. .} ,.,, _.. .:_ > -. .....: r.,, -. `�iFx. .. F...�. /�y F.^7.,"�'`n::. -y...„".`.."'""'..w.,•�rrk-...rAr�iy . nIF. S�7d,.� rr ,..y.. •y!�a - .y i.yx a.. .'. ...-. �• 3yo,.YA .+ '• , � 24>1'.141e . w ter �� .. �.• '.�� j 3 r mss' ,;.;gb �� •r'.'fi�' � -� ,�[� � •s�,,.+r, y� 'fi f-�-.%r� -,Y, - 'i - r - � q�,y ,.. %mss ..t.$. .n-"!.J. .+.•}ifsa - t 4 -4-, a - i ,x -s y .>•k�"•� i r •at' � 4_ -' }_ s.'',bj:M or. .. ,fij•. r��/” .1,. q�s ... `F' � � V:l'�-y��"��Jf, _.ss. - ..✓•-yy. f �}°,♦_ s J r' ;C` ..'� '+K .;:i.. `.,{♦ �s .T.--fir- r ° -A .' v+ : v oodvel • • .. __.:,M.i ..,.,.. ...�.. • .. :.., .:,..^ ..._.,,: ,... ::- ..:., ...,,;.;, i .� irsk:..^'at¢"i'�^,"8 t-_�' s- °art+t r�i, t. .•.' • i44-X , : n f t Key Similarities Start Date: 01/2015 Completed: On-going Cost: N/A • Hydraulic Modeling Firm's Role: Project Management, Planning, Hydroclimate and Food • Engineering Studies Systems Modeling Contact Information: Stephanie Johnson Reference Telephone Number: 202-3343385 Email: sjohnson@nas.edu * Professional Experience of Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD, BCEE, D.WRE, PMP, F.ASCE Project Descption: 300 Engineering staff* are part of a national-level committee of experts charged by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).This Congressionally mandated activity reviews the progress toward achieving the restoration goals of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). To this end, the Committee on Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration (CISRERP) meet two to three times annually to receive briefings on the current status of the CERP and scientific issues involved in implementing the Plan. The committee produces a biennial report that provides: 1. An assessment of progress in restoring the natural system, which is defined by section 601(a) of WRDA 2000 as "all the land and water managed by the federal government and state within the South Florida Ecosystem; 2. Discussion of significant accomplishments of the restoration; 3. Discussion and evaluation of specific scientific and engineering issues that may impact progress in achieving the natural system restoration goals of the Plan; and 4. An independent review of monitoring and assessment protocols to be used for evaluation of CERP progress (e.g., CERP performance measures, annual assessment reports, assessment strategies, etc.). Dr. Miralles-Wilhelm is the lead for sea level rise and climate change in CISRERP. http://nas-sites.org/cisrerp/committee/ ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. 90 Ta b 2 1 • Pro .oser Q Supplemental Project SF'.MRQ•rF n 4 2,,,,,0 Exist,S:ondrtion wit.,!0"o Ramfa+i SF'✓s1�tM v66 d 2r 2010 Eusitn<Cort,liircns w+tt tt�"Ra,ntaak nrtctase mous 3SO Exist,C:oncif;inn Decease arta S S Degree C eisaus tnc�ease zius Mean Annual Water Surface +,5*csot`.°a Level Rise mous 2010 Exist,Circe+ 0965-2005 Simulation Peed) !dears Annual Nater>urraK e • '\ \'':\ " \ ,' x ,1 annual Sea levet at Kay W*it Proyested Sea Lays/R.se Range based a,n USACE w uedans• /''Pi Nrstorrt Key West Ser Laval Rt.Rate for Cornpaetsan ,e C.....).1 76 -.;e* ) IP s M w ��., ,0.500 To 40 6 1. 0300 s a ,, 0.200 \\„ �y 9� ai 0 100 '� L > ,7" ////4U.010 `.\ \ � ' ' , r, 0.0130 I. '1 "" ae"1 /��/l�� 0.010 � ......______, o - 10(/'' 0 100 iA-0 200 1,,,L ""''�- t 1 1 -0.300 - ,: \o' .C:,''1/44 0 5(30 \\ 4, Meters 0\ C (NG VD 19 9k ';.,, 1980 1990 2 /010 10/0 2030 2040 2050 2060 y Y t Genertiszed Hrstarrcai xx' " e./''' Everglades Boundary Figure 1: Sea level rise projection for southeast Florida (SFRCC, Figure 2: Differences in water stage between scenarios of 2011) increased (+10%) rainfall and decreased (-10%) rainfall/increased evapotranspiration with sea level rise(Obeysekera et al.2014) , SLOEVPO_RFOTO SLo_EVPO_RFO_T0 SL0_EVPO_RFO_T+ SL-_EVPO_PF0_T. - ~' „. v:: —wool';,',',/ , -..itefile .,..-414**4.finr ,,,„. gto ,,,:, -----" ,iNi 4, --., -..--,or we,.. 4. 4** r--- \ . vii- 41111.119 ,v IP,Ter ,.. 4*taw ,• "'lir fie ***.Pilic417. —- '441141° ,-- **1.11101•4* , i \\ V 4,-,.-:' ,,‘,00404. ' "lair ,,,,,,,4.4...4, itik - , I, 't '1/'':,,' . ii. < t-- ,. - Int; - -411104, -7„:44re",-7, i A , ' , - ,. :,, k''' ,,,*-t_. ti, N.0,40,1,,, _., 111,94.air I,;tr.-40, IPIPPV-.I' 4*c i.y,,,,,,_ - ..„ ,s,„,,.„ � ►�� /� F' �fM, 4, „..,...,..7 ,,,_ k .1 \ ' - ' \';,,,' , ,. k \ 1 ,.,s,„:,,,,„,,,i /' .t_��,..r44\tP ,♦r. TYn �• J . **1,00.10 , � C P 1'14'la - 4 4 , .. 7 .c ry,4,'' ' *-,..,A , 5 ,.... .. ,,,./ ,___-..., ,_____ja, y 44-p-- • ., : 4,14. / "Att. a.,7 � ' Rt \NINO. . sr Nik.* . as =Nom' INKE.min '_ %0000 OS t -( 0 ( Figure 3:Spatial distribution of habitat suitability index values in Florida Bay for several climate change scenarios and species of fish(Keay9 et al.2014). 10 :,„/, Food-Energy-Water Nexus Modeling M (K) AN 1980s PR Wm/day) BA, 1980s ar 4 - 'aka,, Ai. t Tlici ,,,, • i , 0 0 i.;: oar.. +. , ....... "'",,,, lit 115 ."....' ; it ei:, rr / sTTTT� :rte �, illif.4* 0 4-, . ,/"' 1 i _I '''', ''' ,„„...,.., , ,,,„„_.4„,.....,.._J ''''-- r \\ \ '--, • 1 ,t 4 \ c'S '''' a \ ! -2.7-L8-0.9 0.0 0.9 1.8 2.7 -2.7-L8-0.9 0.0 0.9 .8 2.7 * Simulated summer mean differences in surface (2 m) temperature and precipitation with and without incorporating the crop-climate interactions Key Similarities and feedbacks from corn growth over the Corn Belt in the Midwest US). • Hydraulic Modeling Engineering Studies Start Date: 06/2015 Completed: 05/2017 Cost: $100K (Engineering Fee) Firm's Role: Project Management, Planning, Hydroclimate and Food Systems Modeling Contact Information: Bruce Hamilton Reference Telephone Number: 703-292511 Email: bhamilto@nsf.gov * Professional Experience of Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD, BCEE, D.WRE, PMP, F.ASCE Project Descption: 300 Engineering staff*provided engineering services to develop a coupled 1 food-climate model (DSSAT/CCWRF) that simulates strong crop-climate feedbacks with important consequences on regional climate, hydrology, and yields at a national level. In the Midwest US, corn-climate interactions decrease temperature (-2°C) and increase precipitation (-1 mm/day). They also notably affect remote regions through mesoscale circulation, causing warmer temperature in the Southwest-Mexico and more rainfall in the Cotton Belt (Southeast),with similar magnitudes.This demonstrates the need to incorporate full crop-climate coupling,which has tele-connected effects beyond where crops are grown. * ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. . ...... ............._.. 92 „„ „„„ 'Gr Tab 2 . 1 pro•oserQualifications Supplemental i ., �� ;'' r. r /,00,'''''/I''',/:‘,./11,', J/ /hra r, v ,ni lr // ��i Ia i/�+i ti I � � YI�� /i%/i�i�i/)/,y�� / s l ,,yr// y� ��.'G/fl J/�,J/y%�/%��a��/S7JfiAv%I�1/n J M/T'',SN l/ �r I/ ,��/ N///�/�a/7y�4Y�l�//r/u73J�J/jJ J1�"i �/� / /any 4/ ,'"?,,/,,,(,', ��'/��j,I°�/�/I//�a/J Jed r iJ I%nJi! / ///, * J r / / r/J r / a y t,, %Iii;',':',0ii,,,,,,,,';',',,',,''',,,:',':;',/1„'/,,,,,;,,,',,,,;:!,/,,,,,!'„,,,,„,,,,,,, g „,, J �Jy e ,A'S+,i, a%,,,' aI / r r 'a/ ,r/ r Y9+N!!a a..ria µa a""4vI "�' ,�',y»'�'` 'R raw y 2 1Y v,, Mw • 4 R b„,. r ''',,ze'*'-,1,i',,,,.''.;tid,'--41',,tio4::,::!,,;,':!,;.',.-'1•k;',.,i44!;:'i';f',;10"''''' , ZVc „ ,',:h,7,,..,:'',..‘,,,,1,4:4,,,,,,-,',,,A `rnq' aro a:+ i,r , ' a +p'E J gqyy4,n %�`n +,,,,,,,,,,'',,t?,. ✓n k, Jv`* Y�o yw' '. ' } ' 1v ,r r yr,,,„, a k'�,„ ,„.l4, J r,l;,,. aq, 1R y, '•i.?%.f+, .'”,S/u.•.JY� ,Jy JH/, yr i' r/ , ' 1/ rj /;F:/jwt +r '4AAJ ,�� '''' ' / FJ i+ ,/�J, ",'',,7;',,,,e,.,','''',.,'''''7$'47/9/,./,';‘,40`4;,..,/,', ,;J '�a/';;qMJp��ti�Y✓f3/f„i1/ l �/ ak a 74�e ,,,,q,„,,,, tr,, ',7/�/,J4 //+�,'Nq, Jy ' ''nP,jl'a' ''''ro'.'t'''';';';',',0,,,;',,,,;, 'J r'/ % //,nlutat ,Y „nW�H , ni„, , ya/ ,J// '''';',/'/,''' /i G 4',i;#,170/7,ii?;:,‘,ii,,,t,,, ''''''''''' '''', , /,, ,u f ,,,:!''''',' _ ., , ,, ... . . . ..... , , , i r , • *gt #0, ., ,„ ., . . • .--,:., ,,.• -" ,,,.: -, : . s III 93 /i:,,"•' !!//F-rN•;r///ruq//'/i%/G: / r/ .. r r ,. .,.,„, !/rr.,r r.,, �i.j�p// ,�,.,:.i „. ..1 111��xr.�H � '.,/i/,.�. $5177;117//''17717'//111'''' :.. ,r�/,.:/� i.�J.y/L„�/„//� -; :///6rr '4.4';' 1 - "�. [ �i u // 74"f//1N � ,ate._...., /! /:;/ r/ // .,/,1,.:/ .. ..' -.. -. :-.. 4,,,4401,01,,,,,,,i/,,,,,,,„,....0,: //Lir' ,///: ... ��///� / .,.,-i ,.. ,>,./�::.. y w,.xlwa./-/ ��':/. 1 / //�/// /., r/:./ a✓.,.: ,.,.'. , /r, ,i ,,,,i ��.�.,i,��/ !/r„,,trrr/4.. ../ .:////%. ,....:.�. . .. � 1/r.: ..�,r,:1/i,...... .. ',.,' _....,..e J 1. .,,/.H,.r n d J � /r ,_�,�// / r /, ./F.,/ d„.�..,/�/��'�IY�� ....., ,, / r _..z', :.. !,. ,. .�: ./.. // // / ,,/aH,ry t'iwrM,l y • �, n!/1�//y/y//Y�!!r./ �/ ,r u rHN//%1/,�/ N� �� ,,.9 �•:a / !i:'a/n f�r:- /i i y/„-,%ylN�lJ.;,r//nQ%.rN/�////////��1��/,/�I�1N1;�,,r'r,,,/�F 4�, ,r, ,;;.ri'.,�, ..%•. 1 i j • Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network ,_.,... ,„ �! t+ 7 ,_ ... i, _ .. + ,..• ,, __, _ _ , ...,.., ., ,, - .-- ,,,,, ,•,....„-. •_. . , _ . be A + '�..: �”. A. .1%• 'p.. a, ce v _ aA d! 4 J yti •♦« _” R:: • ” y, San,% i'-- ' v - Y: ,o 4,-;',.^ ”RR�M"Wl ',,,,,4,--'''4,0",-0,1,,44.---..-.i.:,,,,, y9)y '/"Mvkw. 3n .. v F��pp .,,La,`",, 1 ��'v: 4 X � .yam J,w.� NYx„x�,� n'p0n^'"<Jijq :.. � r .x� Nro 4 wn: we R,weoan :Im ..r,'.b. y.w r� c Maw ...a „p. s c'-:,,.►., ..yw„ M'bAhr.. Y „a;<. „�• K„ i4y.,. wY y r M� ' '1 �. ., •vw:v ':.v.♦ i:..Sira•4...w. :top"'" .. .x "�aan.MgR''•"�.. aJ y �,.. �?. r .,w y��o+ J, . r a 'fir '"' �' . w:.�,;.a".+++" . k -0 Sal /k ✓ J „,,,„6:: 8 ,'°4"y��'�' '�' i!i�:, � t G;aw'" 0 9a :w —.,r177 ... - - .. /„,,,,,,a1 , �. „„,,,,...J+:0 -,+w w •ro,.” �` e s a wµ 6 a,y ra x+cAro �fia•."' �'"�""'" w�"J"..'.t,x' "gym,...:,..,„1„,,,,,,, .,.,.. ""l .,,,,,,,,,,‘„.1,-.„ $'vA M ,t SbS w : . .,, 9. „:. ... .:....:. +,. .:t�ia�,v.x.wa.,„w: :: .9R#k. �.aw:!t•,a:, 'NS�" '�..:,... A o':.,.;.k:.„roa+.;r... °'%” ..:.. ._ �x.'�•'edYSus. So •....�^A, ;:. :,.: orr#$'hVF:AYa .`,o "" ,;; w.?'•a a '..-:.:.r ..':,... „,.: ra.. {::M.... :4„,,,r.-...,,, $ _A ,,..,, ,..... ,„;:.. ". ,µk, :t ,a ,,,.rim �.., '4"--***---- :•. .,;::, a.•n fi$',. 11WW'e,as.s. �, �. _,,..„ -,.....- 4a�wwrm,..,.. a,.W.9,. .. .,,,,,pr�w•. . N>w"" ..t:u Yw, ..: "---''.. .,•., .. .: :y Ja\ ouN tJ„ .'trC°..� +••.. ...”„ 1F .,.,..:.. ....h ..,..,ata,.. ...,, ,��. .,. `�'.otyb... ,... y.,': r J '�� , « w,,era, _ r ».,:: M." . res: .,..,........ ..,,: „.,.,.. ., x.... ... +q._. ra w... w...!..:w.:;,, +am•.:�.: a. 1. 4-* .,.._.":. ,....:. ..ip'..,;... ....",....aero;.: i''''',—.v..' �1C''•..v�Yv rw -,.----;'-'0,244%,"—..' , .. . ,• „ 4F Y�'M ! "A/':..rAir.' ,H., a;,.«uc w y ,..+:. 'r nMkrRa1/ 1.0e,„,„:,-. � ♦. "'.,. r • ti 1TP'3 a y,:.; ykn �,. mc,,•¢ N 7I : w x. - ,.... Key Similarities Start Date: 10/1/2015 Completed: 09/31/2020 Cost: $12M (Engineering Fee) • CC/SLR/Adaptation/ Firm's Role: Focused on urban flooding, coastal storms,regional droughts, • En ineerin Studies and extreme heat waves coproduce data, models, images, stories, and g g on-the-ground projects that show how a new resilient infrastructure can be developed Contact Information: Antoinette Winklerprins Reference Telephone Number: (703) 292-7266 Email: anwinkle@nsf.gov Project Descotion: Climate change is widely considered to be one of the greatest challenges to global sustainability,with extreme events being the most immediate way that people experience this phenomenon. Urban areas are particularly vulnerable to these events given their location, high concentration of people, and increasingly complex and interdependent infrastructure. Impacts of Hurricane Katrina, Superstorm Sandy, and other disasters demonstrate not just failures in built infrastructure, they highlight the inadequacy of institutions, resources, and information systems to prepare for and respond to events of this magnitude. The highly interdisciplinary and geographically dispersed Urban Resilience to Extremes Sustainability Research Network (UREx SRN) team will develop a diverse suite of new methods and tools to assess how infrastructure can be more resilient, provide ecosystem services, improve social well-being, and exploit new technologies in ways that benefit alI segments of urban populations. Starting with nine network cities six continental U.S. and three Latin American, home to over 35 million residents and expanding in future years, the vision of the UREx SRN is to co-produce the knowledge needed to promote resilient, livable cities in a future that will look very different from today. The extreme events that this project will focus on include urban flooding, coastal storms, regional droughts, and extreme heat waves. These events are already occurring with shocking frequency in U.S. and global cities and we expect that their frequency and intensity will continue i uvn to increase in the future. Infrastructure is viewed as an important line of 9,... Sea LeV&Level defense against hazards and disasters, yet current urban infrastructure is ' - i Sotuti.ns teraging and proving inadequate for protecting city populations. The UREx team will link SRN scientists, students, local practitioners, planners, industry, 94 ab1 • g , , . , Pro.oor Qualification SupplementalProject NGO's, and other stakeholders across>25 institutions and >70 collaborators to coproduce data, models, images, stories, and on-the-ground projects that show how a new resilient infrastructure can be developed. Infrastructure that is flexible, adaptable, safe-to-fail, socially equitable, and ecologically based will enhance urban resilience in the face of a higher incidence of extreme events, more culturally diverse communities, and continued urbanization pressures. Ultimately, the UREx SRN will help accelerate knowledge generation and application to encourage innovative strategies towards urban sustainability. Daily Precipitation>1 in 8.5 days 2.7 days 8.5 0a s 2 7.7,1;:y s 2.C)lays 14 i 1 i i 1 • Y ',1 DI.r- + cif T ti I) _ 71 4 1 1 i i HST{W 1-20M R CP4.5(2021-2050) PCP4.5(2071-210(4 RCPO,5 t4.2021-205G1 Z CP8.5 t,20 1-210E4 Daily Pr+acipitn>2 in 1.5 Cays 1.7 days 1.8 clays 1.7 1.8 clays 3- 1 1 r 1 6 , 7. 2 Q ila f si .,„ .TY Y- A • 0.5 t 1 t t f HST 41 ii7 -.2000) RCP4.5 2021.2050) RCP4.5 t207, H. RCP8.5 20: :.:f.,:. RcPa.5,207 1'--2100 Daily Preciprtalian>3 in 0.5 days 0.5 Ctay's 0.6 Cays 0.5 y's 6 tis 1.5 t t t { I ir ty h • • -- - • ` _ L 'h'Te M 05 - T jt 1 l' T T ... 0 t t t t i HST X41 1-2000.! RCP4.5(2021-2050) RCP4.5(2071-2/N4 RCPS.5(2021-2050-. RCPS.5 t,207,1-21 001 Downscaled scenarios of climate extremes for Miami Beach. The annual mean count of days with daily precipitation more than 1 inch (upper panel), 2 inches (middle panel),and 3 inches (lower panel).Circle markers indicate the multi-model ensemble-mean time-mean annual count; black lines indicate the 10th-90th percentile range of individual model time-mean results, with additional small blue points indicating the outlier models. [The daily output of three climate fields of interest (maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation) from 32 CMIP5 models (Taylor et al., 2012) were statistically downscaled to a 1/16° x 1/16° horizontal latitude- longitude grid over the contiguous United States using the Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) method; prepared by Ballinger& Kunkel, North Caroline State University.] 14! 95 '4/rWater Val Impacts a ,,,, ��-�� Monitong rxtheof EverglaNationala ,,,,,, r +tS,c �x:.:: ...�.. ,,. :r�.,- , r•;r"+'♦.;a ,.�� :: ..`.,. ,: .. + pK.";:4�"�" •�'•a, ..'NM+ "'iC'+w. .,- 4'e,it;:,„„., — '':, i:,..,,,,,,,t � .# ,i�• -,f,,$) .- --111114: :,,;-,::,'"4,,,,,, ♦, u.4,,,,,w..,';,,i.',,,,,,400,:.. :«: qx',^% 'I. '''''.7"....'"i .x w' ,+ % 77, '�i° +r9� 8 : ,,' � a!' .,,,.Tey. .,. v.. ry :�✓� ,.� '� .^!, ...:�•,.,.w. ,. � w,� �+',,,,,,,,p,,!,......_� " A, .. �"•'�,>'.:``�may,•�.... *.:-=1.-, � ,*":41:r",. ;;!a.�y ' ,y;,.. ,r c.•,., �.�* "1t9 .,...f{�',. -• .. �" 'y . +�"'y".. +.�, ry� ;.-:�.a,�:r° - 2 ..,'^R�!'y x. t.9•x, w♦C' i T •i t #^� � f .ei '�7 , „+q♦ y `, �. 4-..`4...'',.,::�... ��, .��" .._. ,s�P' - � 'M� .♦} ,: �.r .n3"�'� .. � ;cam, J .,,... e g��'x�..x�s�iP'� r.r Asa- J .; �4.1':-T*'. Xr 14 t , ,,'-'iico, c a s. - ,..--: - Ifi',,L,7_. S.: ' s ,� .� a f , a• 6 , - :?z. it:3, , x C,,,>e �^ � t` � \� 4' 1 �... ,Mph'�~. '/ �, '--�. ' - am 4',044. ,.17„- ra „ ,, x,vti r l.w' .y . y °. T ; ` `` i e, ! -� £ 7P,44.-, 4Aili\' • s- ,� N.„,,,i___.----,--,34-,' � ;*t om „'°" Y� 4y .. k �"4 of ., \1. `� ,\•,, 1 '44! 4,' fi k tiiSt!.- :-*- ...„ , -,,,_ ' ‘N•tif( " 2,,,, .\ ',,,,—,-,1... ——- • . f ' ., s. 4 - w. • + t sr. +, 1 •�w s ; A. s, a ,a.»•. wpl6 yy q i aF s Key Similarities Start Date: 7/16/2009 Completed:07/15/2017 Cost: $2M (Engineering Fee) • CC/SLR/Adaptation/tation/ Firm's Role: Analyze water quality and hydrology data, data collection Resilient Contact Information: F U Resiliency Reference Telephone Number: 305-348-1576 • Engineering Studies Email: edward.castaneda©fiu.com Project Descption: The overall project objective is to continue monitoring water quality and hydrology in Taylor Slough and in the mangrove estuaries north of Florida Bay. A main focus this year will be to assess the water quality response to operational efforts aimed at maintaining a hydrologic barrier on the eastern boundary of the Park. We analyze water quality and hydrology data to determine possible causes of nutrient enrichment and cattail expansion. The objectives include: (1) characterizing water quality in L31 W at the canal site, Slough 1, Slough 2. Sites that are also monitored as part of this larger water quality network include Main Park Road, Lower Central Taylor Slough, Argyle Henry and Taylor Mouth. main focus of data collection and analyses this year will be to improve understanding of water quality and hydrology resulting from water management operations of the eastern Park boundary detention areas. Continuous surface water discharge, associated water levels and total phosphorus concentrations in areas along the eastern boundary of Everglades National Park. a 96 Tab 2 . 1 Pro •oser Qualifications Supplemental Project *P , i ,., i, .-:\ , . „,,,,4,,,, , - 1 4 , if '1 . ,,,,, .,„;-..., , i 7,11 0 I ik.,,,, r '1 1.‘vr "' ,; ; i i t .1 ,71"1.,,,,,,Viriii.7.,'*4-1, ', , • ', 4. '. /„, ' . ;St Nki.,,,,,,', : ' na I", : , \4 ' , itlAi 4,, 4 „ioti , i.,, \ -, f,,L, '•,,,4.4401...--,1-. , .,-, -,7,- ,--1....e. 't':117, :+,1*.,,I , N, , ii ''s* t 11'.,,,;;;--.:-', , , ,, ‘; ,,, 4, ., ,i '''''' t, 'PY,. 7'i, '''' '''. "11, ' 'ii. '* ! ''''ill''. ' „ .,' t , ''''' i,' , 9,, , '',,.;s " l; tl . * I/',' (,'',n, ,r f•+'++ ,, '',0,". : '''' li* , ---1"7"' ''---.'''''')1*i:','/I:10,;1'' ' '" '''''' : i ti 4',. ,,';'i; .'','41' ''1 • 4 * 1. t ' ,ft, t,,1111 ' , . 1 4111„ y.:. , 'It, ., 4 . - t 600 150.0 3.00 -S332D flow •53320 • UT S1 WL 500 • UTS2 WL 125.0 2.50 S332 Ii 1 •MPR I . I 400 100.0 r5c 2 00 'IC • „ ri „ 1 , a , i , i 1 , ii/III 75.0 I ..i... 150 • x • 300 . 2 : • . ..), • . i1 1 I 1 1 l lo • . II, 50.0 • • , 7 - • , : 4 ,, ,_. • i r , 1 7 * '1 2: , .' * I $ •i 'et, • e, • x II ,Ii( . , * a• a . 1-1;'.' 0.50 .)4(01t . . . a • s'''.. I''''', •II' ,,;. 7. •I zl too : 1 , k . :. ., 25.0 • ilk!, 114 ititiglika iiiiii.. '..•'' ,'.tiiiki. 84.1116 1 0 i*•-I...:,,,,,'sii.'‘.,.,-1,.7 t*,:),-c';s,f.,:....,','" -;,., .," ,.., •, 4-, •1'*. ,c, ec,, 0.0 , , , , /0'iok' ,Ci ic)`b St',' e $,. ,k, ,1, \ ,(cs ,,t• ,,,,' '1114* 97 BrookhavenNational Master Plan , . / ,. , ./., , ,.. 4 , . , . , , „, , , . . „;,, , , „ , , , 4 , , :::14,,,, I "'"'"'" '' 4.Niv. c I , ,k � h �, y � 4 I / —ti. ayf J'f.vr ?Y�� ° �,a s � / i t ... r. , +144 52.4eN,72 51.12'W / i i �V 1j ♦. Y.,. i. I J i , -11iii - 1.-: Jf,,;. � . - t,,,,,, . . ,• i Are..i)j, 44.r t'�+ 1 Upton �� , • , 4../'.rt,'7 4 4,- l''.i-,—, '..ip - • r ' '... �/ / U � % r.:.. # .. ��J� : ; t?).-' A 7,,A : , . *-i.,4,, i ' , r f ,,.. , , , , -,.....-: ,,,., 4-44, , ,,, . --, 1,4, rsp...4, i ,, , ,i ‘....,,,,„, tt—",:c, -- -z : :pilikt -,,,, - • . „,, . Key Similarities Start Date: 1997 Completed: 1999 Cost: $150K (Engineering Fee) • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Nitrogen removal,Sewer rehabilitation,Wastewater treatment, Systems Cost Estimating Contact Information: Edward T. Murphy, P.E. • Hydraulic Modeling Reference Telephone Number: 631-344-3466 • Water and Wastewater Email: etmurphy@bnl.gov Master Planning • Water and Wastewater Project Description: System Expansion Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) is a multi-program laboratory En in rin t located on 5,265 acres of land. BNL is managed by Brookhaven Science • g ee g S udies Associates under contract to the United States Department of Energy.The • Cost Estimating / BNL facility contains numerous research and support buildings, including Scheduling various facility services and research related processes that generate sanitary and process wastewater which are conveyed to BNL's Sewage Treatment Plant (STP). This project was to develop a new Sanitary Master Plan for the BNL facility for the period beyond 2000 and address new issues not in included in the 1989 Master Plan. The new plan evaluated nitrogen removal, additional sewer rehabilitation, expanding the sanitary sewer system to serve areas currently on septic systems, improvements to the wastewater holding ponds, and evaluating the appropriateness of recharging the treated effluent verses discharging it into the Peconic River. D&B Project Responsibilities D&B Engineers and Architects, P.C. (D&B) project responsibilities included the following activities: • Description of BNL wastewater generation activities • Estimating existing wastewater flows and sources • Review and evaluate the existing wastewater treatment plant units and performance cl • Review and evaluate ongoing sanitary sewer collection system projects and ongoing wastewater treatment projects • Evaluate regulatory issues such as SPDES permit, Peconic River, Sole Source Aquifer, Long Island Pine Barrens and National Environmental 2 . 1 1 „ Ta Pro.. lo•o , w ,,, .,„ .. oser Supplemental Policy Act, compliance with the regulatory requirements, and identify new regulatory requirements • Analyze alternative wastewater treatment processes • Recommend actions and develop cost estimates for the wastewater collection system configuration, expansion and rehabilitation • Recommend actions Major Recommendations • Install new gravity sewers and pump stations to connect the outlying areas • Continue to prioritize rehabilitation of the collection system • Reduce the non-contact cooling water from the on-site buildings by diverting it to the storm drainage system • Develop full process O&M procedures to determine alkalinity, ph and organics to control the nitrification process • Utilize the new UV disinfection system • Construct a new aerobic digester • Upgrade and rehabilitate the existing intermediate filters • Install a new 30" ductile iron outfall and provide erosion control at discharge point into the Peconic River \ :.nrim w,.. x. N+ w::i ^•.... , V ,IYY l : w F" », ., „. ,,,,,,,:, ": F PYA 0, .,�' fan. NP ¢g q NSA{ o r, 9vA� i/ie. +RquWpLg , : ti a�w Vii, 6 q �,'F';',':,, ' r s I,* 8 'Aoa 9 X, , Jell jv � �x Jr v,, , , . ,,,, ,,, 44,.., Alb . - , .., , ,, 0 - A, , ,,,, ,,,,, „ , ii„,13.-------.....„\ x iiio' ..,,....4,00 - - ., 4, y x ! ,�' ,. 1 G- , , . ..„ , -, d , , * ,, ,„ , - 1 , 44, , . a „, : ' 1111.#.4t1 tit,', ,,,, , .4, a a„ .,'; :t. ;,.� rw ,,,,,,� „a::. y SYN r° w.s a,.,,p., +»+' v+Awxd(. '" d *. n . ak .,„a\b :# ,y% ^ i � � ., +5,.:.:;,¢t,, c E A'�,,\ ��`v�tA`>�Y t1 r..`�..`..�t\` 4 d.�� #v ^� Ai '�:,;..' :M .A... ` ',Arty\,,,Y}.1,.�,.: t ^` Sxt a YY 7;14 :',. " A , ' ' ,, ''''''',..#,Pil;!!::„,- lilt , , , ,_.„'41.!"- —lir' i .... , ,, dd' a e r* NES '� W JaP fi a b ! tea% — 1/!° 99 4/4/�//�///:,/u:�///�/r�r/ I///J/// J////, /� './......;// ' v/�Nl,rt///rJr//�%�/ r/i// Fr:;S :..,,... /. % y,r / /fir/ rrl,/u/rr, / �/i/ ,.. -:. ..//: r r J �/�/,,i. „ .,. - .�nirri�,JJ/,///i.:,//r//i//r!/M/I/ ,.,..,/rrrr // �i�i''!<:.'� .... ,./r / , ////N� � ,r y,. / r//:r /qi ri rn:,. yhr//fi%lr%/4N/JJ:Q�/// ,,..,i/J,.,./f//�i/ /-. J /..•...,d .. :.rl.,l/ I/„ /,.r;; _.. < /i ,,,'Oi�/I//r r7i r r,::,,.:,,.. I /I%;;r. lij:ni,;'.Hr r.u/JHr7�/�/�/�M„ /, /,;, /U.�I G��l�/u: r/o,ru,., -N r,: -:>h 1J4%e/r71// /�/,VOA, b/iris'/ / ) ;;;,' u e ro ec s as �e oWASD's Water Transmission and DDivision g " . ,,, , __ , ,,,,‘,,,„ \ ---„._. 1ma .:'- ,,:/`. wa..:,: \,, ..e . A ' rr�Q � - '4 vV\c\\, V\ ep\9w4\u4 " " E ,r;',,MN. . �\ \ \e ,,,o' eat$k a \ n z,: a Fewk ,. ; 4 \Nx• v ` \\ \\\�\\ 2\\�,rW ,Ab ti Ix.:t.' i , a • '''et,,.'.�k.: ab'� 4"b,. eve, '7,7:46.4.4$\ \\ g �H � Y1"� m b,'" ,,„ +dY ', tro.,,. ':,� i\A, "N'� •i.i. p ,4,4'i ry:4 M` P : ,fW...bY C°A •'"..,,,,,,,.,: \'a:a.e �...` ;�) - 5 y� itit 2 h iK ,,,, t,!,' i , ...,:‘, _Ar,, �R•A 5.�`M��,� � :;yF9^N„�c^b' '�' w .,R p .,•,.i\ \,,,' b" � rr w"fan• x h .. ,� r. S��` � ., ,.. ..;:,e,„,,, \ \� ra.; a s��L�C; :a<' may,`aa�a� b.,� �" ��, ,� w „. ,a�^,-,,,, .\Aa,a, ''' y a ;1'44 ' G6��''y� yg." �\ x�ilA.;4:,,,,...,,,,,,,,„ n'�Wi ,.. \ , : ,-gJ'b,'Y,�) y.•I • �,"� •:Ff ''r,A�� ..' ,fit r r A , 1(" i. 4'44",, .: A*,n\c�M\ �y +,"\ \ ! a d\Y ) Hy, ..ti, Al ita "v. ,y,z,,' a qua "c\ice\�A\'. y��\\\\"M1. .• ''k. w.,. .,. r M '' '„•`•ea.....any, \ Y .. 4,44;e* e1: N; n ;, (>.,,. .r.. i;'.:. e .:n°\�\ a..M m. 1::;,',\\\%"11, : bt),,, °bc. w'. x ea'F1*,-, °y1",17::: .0.'" !",� , �." / d ',: „�C,':,,.y, �, `\\\ "v:' "Y.:. ^.�.Yv, J4:-,4:7 +VNO.n •. ,u � ,:,. .�Owu, m' ''i.. � \:\\\�"'.�'... � 0 ,'.�y..,;. ,. �� X11. x. •. :5 <V.Y•,...,.. :,.,. �'... ^� ., ... ,:. :.,.."002#.,.:.«. ,.,. ..u.. P,.,;\.. .w:.,,,�:. ��;N�\ :i,. ) a ., ,.w.,. t ds. ��f ro,,,,,,Ph�z"'..r \ \� '0 ,(b1bF' i' (� � ,, "�S� �Mr g$y ,,x ro, e' � w ." 'ewa^tiai; \.• e', ” �, ° "` °' ;s wit 2:: ,,, a �b �p ) "a( pyp�;..,ar '+r. �,n R`, WC�.w:�' -,70.47' «w , ��.�"q,.-r," x' - r r. \\.�. l "' of , :\ ?t, , ,,p• . :<� •� ,.;;:,,... > �. , �Y, "dG "qt9�,r...,, �`\"i.::.\\.it,.,,�� i�" �4Akyy. xAR'ay:. 'dR1. „k`. t�i" 9k•,,..' :A+>`$.W'0'�i' +, ,.„. :,., ¢a w' :•!;,aw�b:,.' .:�.��\• � �'` '”a'`�''•., " rp`• ".�A'wq. " Fm.., r: -, y +a yJ .,".. ,. \\ar...: �R: �\F>x'1 ,,,,., „� ` •�vHa �x�4'. .\ y ¢,,/y�H/h'��, )�ry�"(, '::,4 /-1" "„r'9a01�.... � n%YUi�,.WS'�'V�W��::Mtld'.H�',.'7'� .J w Ox wNx/�f�.: Key Similarities Start Date: 08/2013 Completed: 05/31/2016 Cost: N/A • Water Distribution Systems Firm's Role: Program Management, Construction Management, Pump• Water Stations Scheduling, Pump Station Analysis Reference Company Name: Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department • Corrosion Control and Contact Information: Adrian Triana Remediation Reference Telephone Number: 786-268-5409 • Construction E-mail: Adrian.Triana@miamidade.gov Management * Professional Experience of Daniel Mathews • Cost Estimating/ Scheduling Project Descnption: g 300 Engineering staff was selected to perform as Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Water Transmission and Distribution Division Chief, between 2013 and 2016. Our staff was responsible for the supervision and management of the daily operations of the different sections within the division, including: System Improvement & Relocation, Maintenance & Repair, Service, Support & Accountability, Data Management Unit and Administration. Mr. Mathews was also responsible for the assessment and evaluation of the water distribution system, executing projects such as: leak detection programs, water pressure problems, fire protection issues and infrastructure replacements. In addition, over his career Mr. Mathews worked on WASDs 6 water pumping stations doing various repairs. Through this period,300 Engineering staff provided services including,but not limited to the following: project management, project control, budgeting, cost estimating, regulatory requirements (health, safety, environmental) compliance, capital project budgets, personnel management, payment requisition review, coordination with other agencies and municipalities. Some of the most significant projects executed under our staff supervision include: Inspection,evaluation and repairs of approximately 120 miles Pre-stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipelines (PCCP) in Miami-Dade County ranging in sizes from 36” to 96". Approximately $90 million spent for this project during Mr. Mathews tenure. This included open cut repairs, carbon fiber AI III repairs, Pipe Diver and Smart Ball evaluations, fiber optic monitoring of ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. most problematic pipelines. 100 Ta b 2 • 1 Pro .oser ualifications Supplemental Leak Detection Program. The program consisted of various loggers,fixed u �` x 404 004,0p# networks, lift and shift crews, and conventional leak detection methods, among others. Approximately 8,206 miles of pipe were evaluated at . '`` �yJ�Nry gFii / each cycle, within Miami Dade County under one of the highest rated leak detection programs in the nation Dual Feed Water Main Program. The program included cases where existing water mains were located at alleys (rear of properties) as well as x in the front of the homes. Plumbers were brought to relocate consumer lines from the rear of the properties to the front. The old undersized alley mains were then cut, plugged and abandoned. This project was 114 executed with contractors, consultants and in house crews. Water Main Replacement Program. Under this program, our staff evaluated undersized, leaking, old water mains and prioritized their replacement. If the estimated raw construction costs were under e - the cap for the State of Florida Sunshine Law the water mains were constructed by in house crews which were under Mr. Mathews. If the project was over such cap, the project would be sent out to a contractor 1 for construction. In house crews install / replace approximately 70,000' of water mains per year. " Pipe Bursting of Undersized Water Mains. This project consisted in the assessment of all undersized 2" water mains, to determine if they could be 111 replaced by the pipe bursting method. If the water main was a candidate for this method it would be pipe burst by in house crews under Mr. Mathews supervision. In house crews replace approximately 6,000' of 2"water mains by pipe bursting per year \ \„r\a\.,:HNV,p aHpy anF As-Builts to GIS. The project consisted of the stream line of the as-builts conversion to GIS. Worked with consultants to speed up as-built records and converting them to GIS. The execution of the project was critical due to raped development and Consent Decree requirements. PSIP Program. During the first Consent Decree, the Water Distribution Division was called upon to assist on installation / replacement of sewer force mains and gravity sewers. During this period crews assigned to Mr. Mathews installed/ replaced over 100,000' of sewer force mains and gravity sewers. Met all deadlines! Mr. Mathews Worked with other cities and agencies on special projects as follows: City of North Miami Beach. Installation of master metering stations. City of North Miami. Installation of master metering stations. City of Hialeah. Coordination of repairs to large diameter pipelines affecting their city. City of Hialeah. Coordination of placing Hialeah RO water plant in service. City of Miami Beach. Coordinated numerous repairs and routine shut downs of transmission water mains that affected their water system. Also,assisted on 54”sub-aquious force main repair that was damaged by dock builder. City of Bal Harbor. Performed numerous repairs on their system on a reimbursable job order basis. Town of Indian Creek. Performed numerous repairs on their system on a reimbursable job order basis. North Bay Village. Performed numerous repairs on their system on a reimbursable job order basis. Also,performed leak detection. Bay Harbor Islands. Performed numerous leak detections on their system on a reimbursable job order basis. 101 .. %;14014,, , /1# nl, 'A'07#7,„/ .;.�/, ✓,i,.i.':.,d�4/.'•s,.,.,.:.,:. .....,,...:.... .:::>..:.. l,., .--,.q.... vrr,.�7I ,/ „,,,,,44,,,,;0/ / •4AR0/% ',/vr!, iax I? d /�. �� V� � � / [ �Va 4 ,,-., iiiiiw. , _. Multiple as Chief of WASD's Assistant Maintenance Supenntendent Pump Division .,..., .-,14, 1=r 46 ,,,s . s”,7'if.; --tk - ., Ff: f-\ ' *-"*,,,,,'* -,,,, r t u—.- wnww' , - 4ii r , \ ffpjj; \ N, , . 4 I .. \ .,eM,.,,, ,�t1F,„ "amu �'71[ Ja'gF��. li .. Sti; Axa "'"'�M 1////,.. , . .4,s \ �� '!.. ..�.� iNWa 1P „S P Pt �jFp k: '-- ' $ r I a SN M * , / ',-, ':"4r . . i , ... _ 0,. igli ii, .9 , '* . , . ., , . f ' S„ aA - e .0 NCS Key Similarities Start Date: 1998 Completed: 2016 Cost: N/A • Wastewater Collection Firm's Role: Budgeting, pump stations operation and maintenance S stems management, capital improvement projects, project management y Contact Information: Albert Galambos • Wastewater Pump/Lift Reference Telephone Number: 786-268-5501 Stations Email: AGALA©MIAMIDADE.GOV • Corrosion Control and * Professional Experience of Charles Sutton Remediation • Construction m Project Description: Management 300 Engineering staff was selected to perform as Assistant Maintenance • Cost Estimating / Superintendent for the Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Pump Scheduling Station Division, between 1998 and 2016. Our staff was responsible for the supervision, operation and maintenance of 514 wastewater pump stations ranging from 5 - 900 HP pumps, owned by the County and co- responsible for the operation and maintenance of all 1,046 wastewater pump stations. Through this period, 300 Engineering staff provided services including, but not limited to the following: project management, project control, budgeting, cost estimating, capital project budgets preparation and management, data collection and compliance with regulatory requirements. Some of the most significant projects executed under our staff supervision include: Wetwell Improvement Program. This program consisted in performing condition assessments of all wetwells within Miami-Dade's system and prioritizing,budgeting and scheduling the needed structural rehabilitations. Mr.Sutton managed the crews performing the flow by-bass operation and the rehabilitation process and subsequent inspection to rate the different process and products. This program completed approximately 30 wells annually varying in size and complexity. Aerial Pipe Crossing Inspection and Maintenance. Coordinated with the Cilk pipeline divisions to establish an aerial pipeline inspection schedule and ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. a process for identifying required maintenance. Mr. Sutton managed the 1W personnel performing the required maintenance of protective coatings, 102 ,„,„ / Ta b 2 • , . ,, ,, .. { pr000ser ualifications Supplemental aesthetic coatings as well as the installation and maintenance of the protective guards for all Miami Dade Water And Sewer owned aerial pipe crossings except under bridge suspensions. Enterprise Asset Management System implementation. Mr. Sutton served as the divisional representative as well as a member of the Change Management Committee during the design and implementation phase of the system. He assisted in the development process including identifying work flows and process, developing asset hierarchies, identifying and inventorying assets, testing, multi-level end user training and roll out. Submersible Pump Replacement.This project involved identifying submersible pumps currently installed within the pump stations or being held as a spare that the manufacturer has deemed obsolete and O.E.M. repair parts are no longer available. Once identified Mr.Sutton budgeted and planned and managed a three-year program for the replacement of the antiquated units. Replacement of Mechanical Equipment. Mr. Sutton managed the budget, procurement, flow control and personnel involve in the replacement of mechanical equipment and appurtenances at pump stations 559 450 HP Booster Station) and pump station 683 ( 150 HP multi-level regional station) due to age and reliability of equipment. Large Diameter Pipe Condition Assessment. Assisted pipeline division by formulating plans and procedures to manipulate and re-route flows as required within the waste water transmission system to allow for the electronic inspection of the large diameter wastewater transmission pipes. Pump Station Improvement Program. Assisted design engineers and consultants throughout the current program as well as the previous program by conducting reviews and giving comment and suggestion to site plans,designs and specifications of upgrades to pump stations from an operations and maintenance perspective. Participated Y ,.• .wro ww+. �"M nC•i" n'"' y , i .i. / .,Abp. W. . , r'---,:::,,,,,,,i;7:,-...z,. AMMA Ay' MP W ':i ♦.. "@ ... ,. .. ,,., :• .,:"dam'.`.�""p°'''.'' �A`�r.y:,. .w.^, .y e. * �',:.' • tY •Y�� »'� r .M � .. a. 1{ y A?r p rp „ g' ,4 4. A' '.r 1PP* 'if',''' ,4,4(:: Kf a '*:n Y a y:'.N ' x; K J` zw" ..:w.t",.)�a ANW:^, rr.r; 103 • Project Manager/ Director QA/QC Franklin A Torrealba, PE,ENV SP 1 Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD 1 Jon Fox, PE Stephen Baumal Deputy Project Manager Diana Santander, PE :2 CIP Master Planning/Hydraulic Design/Permitting/ Modeling Systems Expansion Procurement LEADER: LEADER: LEADER: Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD 1 Kenneth Caban, PE, BCEE 2 Rafael Ballesteros, PE 1 Pedro E Gonzalez,MS Steven A. Fangmann, PE Richard Coates, PE Daniel Mathews Pedro E Gonzalez,MS Reinaldo Rivera, PE, ENV SP 1 Robert L. Raab, PE 3 Kenia Gonzalez Janine Alexander, PE Charles Sutton, CUC 1 Justin Voss, PE Andrea Ramirez, El,ENV SP James Christopher, PE 2 Christopher A.Zavatsky, PE 2 Rodolfo Remon, MS, ENV SP Andrew Woodcock, PE 2 Jonathan Moreno, MSc Nicholas Fernandez, El ENV SP 1 John Toomey, PE Paola Davalos, ENV SP 1 Timothy Ramlakan,MS 1 Subject Matter Experts: '� F V A. Water Distribution System: Daniel Mathews, A g,* B. Wastewater Collection: James Saren C. Water Pumping Stations: Charles Sutton/Daniel Mathews D. Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations:Charles Sutton/Kenia Gonzalez mm' E. Water Distribution Design Engineer: Rafael Ballesteros,PE/Janine Alexander, PE A T1 , /7,/, F. Wastewater Collection Design Engineer: Rafael Ballesteros, PE G. Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer: Fernando Miralles-Wilhem, PE, PhD/Justin Voss, PE H. Corrosion Control and Corrosion Remediation:James Christopher, PE I. CC/SLR/Adaptation/Resiliency: Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PE, PhD/Kenneth Caban, PE, BCEE/Shimon Wdowinski PhD/Tiffany Troxler, PhD Teti „ ,11,4414 Ion is Ta b Team Qualifications Organizational C Company Legend 1 . 300 Engineering Group 2. Tetra Tech 3. D&B 4. FIU-SLSC CNA/ Services Value Engineering o& CC/SLR/Adaptation/ EI` rvlc � Engineering Studies Resiliency LEADER: LEADER: LEADER: LEADER: Stephen Baumal Jorge Szauer, PE 1 Daniel Mathews 1 Shimon Wdowinski, PhD 4 Arthur Tillberg Omar J. Herrera, El, ENV SP 1 Charles Sutton, CUC 1 Walter Tang, PhD 4 Reinaldo Rivera, PE, ENV SP 1 Richard Coates, PE Angel A.Curbelo 1 Tiffany Troxler, PhD 4 Robert J. DeGiorgio, PE Christopher A.Zavatsky, PE James Saren 1 Kenneth Caban, PE, BCEE 2 Armando Godoy Rodolfo Remon, MS, ENV SP 1 Ana Dvorak,MS Support Services Project Control/ GIS Cost Estimating CMOM Scheduling 4 Stanley David,MS 1 Claudia Gabuardi Arthur Nix, PE 1 Abigail Diaz 1 y 47-r iA 105 w r 1 r rr,///.r , ,,,,, •,'.... r ,tr,,:i...! i. /rri/r i.rii r ,„ / / ,r...i,r/�i�, r r:::. r,,• ,,;: r•/ /�/��i./v/�/i�alirrrir.r„// r/ i/r:': '.,;.. .,.. ,.• r.;!./ ,. ,r., 'ii b d//,'.n,r/r//N/NirL I, r. r/c,.,'.r.., r„ r.ii:,�//r„rr„///.,r/r /� /,prr,/� /h /r///9/i!n /,,,,,,,: „/,,,,•r _: .' ria i/f/,,, /i /:..:. ,,rr_,.. ';' , [//r/ / ,.;:,,, •:,. •.,,,,.,.:. rn,•vrn/i:.:G;ri//r rvii!G„r:,l/,o/L//N „t;j/j/,r/,fir!'.o/i///// i ,:;•„r /„r r'i ///rpri % ',„';,'„"'"',/,,';',9,47,/,',1' K/�,„,///�,/�,,ori//�//i/'i//�,/'��%,,„„,/', What MAilERS. . . , „.„.....,,,,,,-. , *. , . ._ ub ec-- c: fHe eo t t e4 k 0f a. Water Distribution System i b. Wastewater Collection Systems ., h= c. Water Pumping Stationj"y /"" M d. Wastewater Pumping/Lift Stations e. Water Distribution Design Engineer '� " ,/ rein ' /... f. Wastewater Collection Design Engineer g. Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Engineer ILI(4 11 H,, h. Corrosion Control and Corrosion Prevention �� .M w .7 I .,i ;' 1 f i'll ,.,-'''',,it--; i qtr.f...0.' 'i' �' NEW PROPOSED SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORY: Ns,, df;i:,,,,,;, '''' ” ,,,,,...$7.-,,,,...„ i. Climate Change/Sea Level Rise/Adaptation/Resiliencyky ' �, i t , . 1 i, i'ant -- - ' . Kenneth Caban, PE, BCEE, LEED AP Shimon Wdowinski, PhD Tiffany G. Troxler, PhD Mr. Caban is a Professional Dr. Wdowinski has over 30 years Dr. Troxler has over 21 years of Engineer with over 20 years , of experience in the areas of experience in biological and of experience in water r/9 , geology, geophysics, and environmental sciences, distribution systems, ''' z environmental sciences , 40 ' addressing issues surrounding specifically in planning ,, 'and in the study of sea ,,� the challenges for the adaptation and resiliencylevel rise, climate change, 44, natural-built environment p g , iiiptellippstrategies of drinking water '`.". land subsidence, sinkhole �,t, and society posed by rising vokr and wastewater systems within ,',,,,, ' development, tectonic plate seas,designing and evaluating Miami-Dade County.Mr.Caban is motion,earthquakes,and wetland mitigation and adaptation part the Built Environment Work Group of the surface flow. As part of the Southeast strategies, and create resilient, prosperous Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Florida Regional Climate Change Compact coastal urban communities. Dr. Troxler is Compact, whose mission is to develop Sea Level Rise Work Group, Dr. Wdowinski the current Director of the FIU-Sea Level focused recommendations pertaining to contributed to the development of the Solutions Center (SLSC).The SLSC integrates regional climate mitigation and adaptation Unified Sea Level Projection for Southeast environment, social and infrastructure data issues in the built environment as part of a Florida, a valuable tool which is used to create knowledge that advances sea regional action plan. extensively in the region for planning level solutions. Matter Category Expert: NEW I adaptation and resiliency strategies in Matter Category Expert:NEW I regards to sea level rise. Matter Category Expert: NEW 1 106 Ta b 2 .2 . 1 , ",. ., , „ ,„._.,„,„,,,,,,„,,,,, „,, . , / OU k.) eat Matter Ex•erts Daniel Mathews Charles Sutton K.enia Gonzalez Mr. Mathews is a Water r Mr. Sutton has over 34 years Ms. Gonzalez has over 44 years `' ,t.Distribution System Level, of experience in sewage ,n,, ,> of dedicated experience Operator with over 38 collection systems and in the area of wastewater p `" pumpingsystems. As a former senior ijor years of experience in wastewater � y i p ' r ,? engineer for WASD's water distribution systems, � facilities. Working as ,r , g s . a_ / including water mains ,fis '14 ' Assistant Maintenance r Pump Station Compliance ,'f and pump stations. Over yi Superintendent for WASD, he "`'', ,,; 1 , r.'f` Section, Ms. Gonzalez was ,.,. the course of his career in "'-‘,.. 7 was responsible for supervising w '�� ,' responsible for monitoring WASD he became an expert the operation and maintenance pump stations performance, as managing and supervising the construction, of 514 wastewater pump stations located well as selecting and coordinating infiltration operation, evaluation, design and within the County, ranging in size form 5 HP / inflow (I/I) repairs based on operational maintenance of water transmission and to 900 HP.Mr.Sutton also has vast experience records (SCADA, ORACLE databases, field distribution systems, with over 200 miles of in preparation and management of inspection and tests results). Ms. Gonzalez water pipelines installed/rehabilitated under wastewater capital projects, and was was the engineer for many pump stations his supervision. As the Water Transmission & responsible for administrating over$5 million in Miami Dade County and brings thorough Distribution Division Chief, he oversaw daily budgets. knowledge of MD-RER and FDEP regulations system operations, including: improvement, Matter Category Expert:C& D requirements relocation, maintenance & repair, service Matter Category Expert: D among others. Matter Category Expert:A&C James Saren Rafael Ballesteros, PE Janine Alexander, PE ,,,. Mr. Saren has over 36 years of ""°,"t,,.Mr. Ballesteros is a Professional Ms. Alexander is a Professional 7.:,, experience in wastewater °" Engineer with over 36 years , Engineer with over 20 years 4\ collection systems, where of experience in utility; of experience in water he has successfully -ngineering, designing utility engineering. Her implemented I/Iater mains, gravity sewer"; experience covers the improvement programs ;�/lines and force mains. Over ' design and rehabilitation of over 200,000 ft of water for several Miami-Dade ' the course of his career, .41,11 County projects.Mr.Saren also ,„ Mr. Ballesteros has been mains ranging in size from 4 in offers over 19 years of experience responsible for the design and to 54 in. Ms. Alexander has led in construction projects of wastewater rehabilitation of over 170 miles of pipeline, several design projects for water distribution collection systems, managing the raging in size from 8 in to 96 in.In addition,Mr. systems including: transmission systems installation,repairs and replacement of over Ballesteros offers vast experience in water improvements, water capacity expansions, 200 miles of gravity sewers and force mains. and wastewater construction supervision, water mains rehabilitation, water meter Mr. Saren is an expert in infiltration / inflow as well as evaluating and analyzing large relocations, evaluation and selection of (I/I) programs, Sanitary Sewer Evaluation scale water and wastewater development multiple design scenarios and replacing Survey (SSES), Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP), project proposals. Mr. Ballesteros has aged infrastructure with new PVC, DIP or Manhole Rehabilitation and Electroscan. created specifications and standards for HDPE water mains. Matter Category Expert: B WASD's water and wastewater systems. Matter Category Expert: E Matter Category Expert: E& F Justin Voss. PE Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, Ph.D. PE _lames Christopher, PE --- Mr. Voss is a Professional �' Dr. Miralles is a Professional Mr. Christopher is a Professional Engineer with over 12 years,/', 1 ',Engineer with over 23 years Engineer with over 36 years of dedicated experience,.` w ';.of specialized experience :-.,',> of specialized experience - 'n water and wastewater 'n water resources, water ' in pipeline & pump stations M• omputer modeling and supply and sanitation. He �k', design, hydraulic analysis, ;t hydraulic analysis, he is 'li ;d ;'has executed projects wastewater collection and ''"'� currentlythe Hydraulics :i°"',.h'"�'sg" ,,/involvingclimate-hydrology- ' ;' corrosion control methods. Y Y gY- v Modeling Technical Group - vegetation interaction, as well -:•. ,,.,..,-'''' Mr. Christopher has executed Leader for Tetra Tech's Eastern as water resources management projects involving the use of Region. Mr. Voss is proficient in the use of in urban watersheds and integrated corrosion inhibitors and sequestering agents software such as: SewerGEMS, WaterGEMS, urban water planning/management. as a means to prevent corrosion and protect PCSWMM, XP-SWMM, InfoWater, InfoWorks, Dr. Miralles has served as lead specialist water distribution systems. He has extensive among several others. Mr. Voss has worked for water resources management and experience applying coupon testing as the Lead Hydraulic Engineer in many climate change adaptation projects, programs to evaluate corrosion control projects involving: water distribution including simulation models of sea driven inhibitors performance and formation of modeling (including model calibration, coastal flooding. Dr. Miralles is an expert in: corrosion by-products. Mr. Christopher has hydrant test results and pressure analysis), Ecohydrology, Environmental Hydraulics, several publications in the area of corrosion hydraulic analysis for systems expansions, Statistical Hydrology, Hydraulic Engineering, control and prevention. Most recently, he flow monitoring, infiltration / inflow studies Modeling and Fluid Mechanics was appointed as corrosion expert for the and sewer evaluation surveys. Matter Category Expert: G& NEW I Flint water quality crisis. li! Matter Category Expert: G Matter Category Expert: H 107 404 , -,,,,,„, I i Amos, 401004 '\\ \\\ ,\\ , rp\\ '�\�\��\, ,t,\ a � \ ,,,\(*\,\\;„,\Aik‘\06,oviN4 \\ Franklin Torrealba, PE ENV SP . , _ Project Manager/Director \ ii, Mr. Torrealba has managed over 500 projects from conception to completion. He has spearheaded the design of 185 miles of water and ,,,, wastewater pipelines ranging from 8 to 144-inch in diameter, and the years of Experience: construction of 45 miles of pipelines ranging 8 to 36-inch in diameter. Mr. 31 Torrealba has functioned in the capacity of Contract Manager, Deputy Program Manager/CM, Deputy Program Manager/Engineering Manager Educatio�� and Program Manager/CM for the largest Miami-Dade Water and Sewer MBA, Loyola University, Nei.,. Department's (WASD) renewal,replacement and rehabilitation programs. Orleans, 199 , if Under these programs, he cumulatively managed the design and BS Civil Engineering, University� construction of over 150,000 If of water and sewer mains,500 pumpstations, of New Orleans, 1986 managed 1700 deliverables, and satisfied all United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) consent decree settlement agreements and certifications. deadlines. In the process, he has assisted the Countyin avoidingmillions Professional Engineer (PE), F gof dollars in potential penalties. He has worked for multiple agencies, ENVISON (lSl) municipalities in South Florida and possess a proven track record. NASSCO • PACP Relevant Project Experience: • LACP WASD's $215M Pump Station Improvement Program (PSIP) - Program • MACP Manager-Miami-Dade County Program Manager for the upgrade of the Wastewater Collection and Envision Sustainability Transmission System (WCTS) including pump stations and force mains Professional (ENV SPS pursuant to which each pump station must be certified as capable of meeting a nominal average pump operating time (NAPOT) of less than Key Qualifications:: or equal to 10 hours per day. Pump stations exceeding the NAPOT criteria • Manager for the must have a Remedial Action Plan (RAP)and no certificate of occupancies development of the Miami- can be issued for connections to the WCTS upstream of that pump station Dade County Water and until the RAP recommendations are implemented. The program aims to Wastewater Hydraulic bring into compliance 113 sewage pump stations that do not comply Models with the NAPOT and Peak Flow Criterion. The program aims to bring into • Program manager for compliance 113 sewage pump stations that do not comply with the several Miami-Dade County NAPOT and Peak Flow Criterion. This program is comprised of four main Multi-million Programs phases: 1) Planning and Engineering which includes the basis of design • Track record for delivering report development for pump station and force main projects; 2) Design County projects on time Management of 8 Design Consultants; 3) Construction Management and under budget of multiple pump station and force main contractors through the • Managed the design of County's MCC 7040 procurement method; and, 4) Infiltration and Inflow over 185 miles of water and Management which entails the management of 4 different contractors wastewater pipeline (8 to for Manhole, Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), CIPP, and Dig and 144-inch diameter) Replace (D&R) contracts. • Managed the design and construction of over 500 WASD's $2.46 Program and Construction Management (PMCM) for the pump stations in Miami- Wastewater System Priority Projects-Task Manager-Miami-Dade County, Dade County Florida • Infiltration/Inflow Expertise Task Manager for the Wastewater Collection and Transmission System • Public Involvement and (WCTS) Task. Mr. Torrealba assisted the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Stakeholder Coordinator Department providing Program and Construction Management Services Related to the Wastewater System Priority Projects, including WASD's third Consent Decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency E NG t N E E R 1 NG GROUP, P.A. (USEPA). Mr. Torrealba acted as the Task Manager for a total of fifty-two 1 Ta b 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes (52) Force Mains and forty-one (41) Pump Station projects, responsible for the engineering (including hydraulic modeling), design and construction of these projects. WASD's $2.5M Water and Wastewater Hydraulic Computer Model - Project Manager - Miami-Dade County, Florida Project Manager for the development and calibration of steady-state and dynamic wastewater system and dynamic water system hydraulic computer models to assist in meeting the growing needs of 2 million county residents,assist in meeting compliance requirements(USEPA/FDEP),and evaluate capacity for new developments to be connected to the existing system. WASD Wastewater Transmission System Hydraulic Computer Model - Wastewater Gravity Sewer Modeling - Project Manager-Miami-Dade County, Florida Project Manager for the incorporation of the gravity system into the WASD's Hydraulic model, through the application of proposed simplified methodologies to expedite the model development. Mr. Torrealba provided engineering, planning, evaluation, analysis, and wastewater modeling services. He also developed the detailed gravity model with as-built invert and rim elevations for various basins. WASD Small Diameter Water Main Evaluation and Enhancement Program, Phases 1 and 2 - Project Manager - Miami-Dade County, Florida Project Manager for "The Small Diameter Water Mains Evaluation and Enhancements Project" to replace all small water mains (6" or less) while minimizing water losses, improving system pressure and providing fire flow protection. The objective was to identify, rehabilitate, replace or renew the small diameter aging infrastructure. WASD Government Cut Tunnel Design-Build Criteria Package-Project Manager-Miami-Dade County, Florida Project Manager for the development of the design criteria package for the replacement of the 54-inch sanitary sewage force main from Miami Beach to Virginia Key and replacement of a 20-inch water main between Port Island and Fisher Island. Managed the data collection, engineering (geotechnical, survey, utility coordination, alternative analysis, tunnel design, and construction methodology), land acquisition, stake holder coordination, permitting, and public involvement programs associated with over 8000 linear feet of sub aqueous crossings,with five shaft locations impacting four islands. WASD's$60M Needs Assessment Program (NAP)-Program Manager-Miami-Dade County, Florida Program Manager/Construction Manager for the $60M water and sewer infrastructure improvement program to identify, plan, design, and construct water and sewer utilities within areas of special needs with the goal of stimulating the economy. The program to date involved 40 separate water and sewer projects involving design and construction of 17,815 linear feet of pressurized sewer force main from 4-inch to 12-inch diameter; 91,451 linear feet of 8-inch to 16-inch pressurized water main; 39,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer from 8-inch to 12-inch; and six pump stations. WASD Wastewater Improvement Program-Deputy Program Manager-Miami-Dade County, Florida Deputy Program Manager and assistant chief engineer of the program management team that managed a$1.0 billion wastewater system improvement program, with detailed management responsibility for the $240 million pump station improvement program.The program included the upgrade of its pump stations and force mains, a reduction of the infiltration, exfiltration, and inflow in the collection system, and an increase in the capacity of its wastewater treatment plants to minimize the occurrence of sanitary sewer overflows. 109 , r , /4 /off 4/. /til/„ �`t Diana Santander, PE Depuy Project YF Ms. Santander has 20 years of years of civil and environmental engineering experience including stormwater management, water 'I : /,":1 ri distribution, wastewater collection systems, water conservation, and solid Years of p ,/� , waste management. She has performed duties as Project Manager 20 for several projects that range from small municipal improvements to y Education'. overall programs involving complex improvements in highly urbanized areas. Ms. Santander has also prepared engineering cost estimates, MS, Civil Engineering,,. Louisiana State University, 1999 performed project cost tracking and scheduling, reviewed final as-built BS, Civil Engineering, Pontifical documentation, and participated in contractor and consultant selection Xaverian University, Bogota,, and management.She also has in-depth experience coordinating permits Colombia, 1996/',,, with various regulatory agencies including Miami-Dade Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER), the South Florida Water Certifications: Management District (SFWMD), the Florida Department of Health, and the Professional Engineer, Florida Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Ms. Santander No. 65854 served as the client manager for agencies such as City of Miami, Town of Professional Engineer,Louisiana Medley, City of Miami Springs, and Miami-Dade County Department of No.32158 Solid Waste Management Republic of Colombia Relevant Project Expeence:Registered Civil Engineer No. Basis of Design Report for NW 79th Street Water Distribution and Wastewater 2520260414CND Collection and Transmission Systems Expansion (Project D2-B), City of Miami and Miami-Dade County, FL OSHA 8-hour Hazardous Waste Project Manager. This project involved the review and evaluation of Operations and Response existing wastewater infrastructure to recommend a plan layout and project Supervisor delivery method to extend wastewater collection and transmission service for invigorating commercial development along the project corridor Affiliations: (NW 79th Street from NW 27th Avenue to N Miami Avenue). The project American Society of Civil also includes the installation of 12-inch water mains in the commercial Engineers areas currently served by smaller diameter pipes. A BODR was prepared American Water Works describing plan layout alternatives, hydraulic modeling, construction cost Association estimating, evaluation, and recommendations for design, permitting, and construction. Key Qualifications: • Project Manager for Basis of Design Report for NW 7th Avenue Wastewater Collection and projects of various sizes Transmission Systems Expansion (Project D2-D), Miami-Dade County, FL and complexity in water, Project Manager. This project involved the review and evaluation of the wastewater and reclaimed condition of wastewater infrastructure to recommend a plan layout and water systems project delivery method to extend wastewater collection and transmission • Evaluation of wastewater infrastructure to system within this corridor that extends along NW 7th Avenue from NW recommend expansion 1 19th Street to the Golden Glades Interchange. A Basis of Design Report strategies was prepared describing plan layout alternatives, hydraulic modeling, • Leak detections and meter construction cost estimating, evaluation, and recommendations for programs design, permitting, and construction of a wastewater system within the • Flood mitigation studies corridor. Water Consumption, Awareness, Leak Detection, and Meter Program, Town of Medley, FL E3 TETRA TECH Project Engineer.Ms.Santander prepared a comprehensive meter testing, calibration, and replacement program for the Town of Medley, Florida. 110 Ta b 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes The purpose of the program is to assist the Town in reducing the volume of non-revenue water in the Town's Utility Department. Water Audit, Town of Medley, FL Project Manager. Ms. Santander was responsible for the review of existing documentation including previous studies, water and sewer bills and meter installation to determine the possible causes of the non-revenue water in the Town of Medley. She conducted site visits to verify that the connections to the Town's water system were appropriate and prepared a detailed report for review by technical and non-technical personnel. North District Waste Water Treatment Plant(NDWWTP), North Miami Beach, FL Performed duties as the project manager for the development of civil and demolition drawings for a rehabilitation project for the pretreatment and sludge transfer facilities at the Miami-Dade County NDWWTP. Ms. Santander attended coordination meetings, conducted site visits, and reviewed the civil and demolition drawings.She also coordinated the design activities with various disciplines,which included architecture,structural and mechanical processes and instrumentation, and electrical engineering. Pavement and Drainage Improvements Flood Mitigation North,Town of Medley, FL Project Manager.Ms.Santander served as the project manager for this project in the Town of Medley that included the design and permitting of a stormwater management system consisting of approximately 470 linear feet (LF) of 24-inch exfiltration trench, 620 LF of 18-inch exfiltration trench, 1,160 LF of 24-inch solid drainage pipe, 1,730 LF of 18-inch solid drainage pipe, 3,850 LF of 15-inch solid drainage pipe, 83 drainage structures, approximately 4,550 square yards (SY) of new asphalt pavement, 1,930 SY of new concrete pavement, 15,000 LF of new concrete curb and gutter or valley gutter, and associated pavement markings, signage, and sodding. Miami Marine Stadium Redevelopment, City of Miami, FL Project Manager. This $18M project included the construction of a flexible park located in an area previously used as a parking lot for the Miami Marine Stadium, a historic structure in the City of Miami. This project includes the construction of water, sewer, pavement, drainage, electrical, communications, hardscape and landscape improvements. This new facility will host events including the Boat Show. Ms. Santander was responsible for the management and coordination of the overall design of the improvements,coordination with permitting agencies and stakeholders, and overall QA/QC. Flood Mitigation Grant Study, Town of Medley, FL Project Manager. Ms. Santander served as the project manager for this $500,000 grant that the Town of Medley obtained through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).The purpose of this project was to find the most-cost effective alternative to alleviate flooding problems within this 266-acre area. Her responsibilities comprised coordinating with various agencies including FDEP, Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER), and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), coordinating with sub- consultants, evaluating areas of environmental concern, and determining the best stormwater management alternatives. Resources Recovery Facility Cells 17/18 Closure, Town of Medley, FL Project Manager. As Project Manager during the design, bid and construction phases of the closure of two 10-acre cells of an ash monofill. Ms. Santander prepared the permit application, and engineering drawings that were submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), assisted the owner during the bid preparation and contractor selection process, and provided inspection services and general project management and coordination during construction. 111 ,..,�, r r r r.. ,"/., .,..„ ,i; �r r .:;,,:i r i'.,. , ,,.,.. /. / /�H/ / //!/// / / .2�� /./, r/ / // /, ,INN..,:rSt/r,r r / 1, ,:::././, / r �i. r // <./,/i n/ // / / rr' /I/rh,... ,,.1,1.,.,. �/ / / / J r r r b//.,1.�r ./i., ,.,.r/ ;,..r �' ��r, / y, 1 / y I/[..N0„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,47,„ //,';;/,',71,4:///// /,;',',40,/;4 / / ,. �./ ,./ /. r. /fd,:J./. / r././ / I .r..�J/ /y , �,%�'., ,....,.. ..., „,„,,,,,,,,44,40;,,,,,,, �J! r l r / N/ 'N ... I.1r..,. ../../.,./i/ /. ,/ l ,/.,,/. r,.' i.,... ',..r/. ,..,,, _ ,r //i/ //�r�r�//. /./,,.. J„r,. ./..,�./ r- /// / r.. ,/ r'.../. /.,_ r.. ., v /,... �, 4,000, „ /, / y,...�./.// //..//.��.! r./ � ,r, 0../.. .,rr;....,, r ,-:::.n,./,. �,... ��,.��J J r/ .�,l, /,,.,:,/ ///�,r/r/!/I//��/r///%/� �/ r 1 N, 4 /�.,..�/ r {/;r/r!%/r%// :,. rid /', // i/ /' ''r � / �, ��.y% ,/ei� f 4•"4/� //!/ 'G///, /I 15 i e /H q„„bIi/.n h q nr /r ini/ligq,„� // q % '/Ani1 * I Z 1 i r ...., - 4, '-, ,., i ,„ � iia Daniel T. Mathews y - O&M Leader, Water Distribution S stExpert, Water Pumping Station Expert, C1em -*lot .v ,, Over thirty-eight (38) years of extensive experience in the water distribution and sewer collection field, having acquired expertise and knowledge in the areas of administration, management, & supervision of Years of Experience pipeline construction and maintenance. Involved in various pilot projects and efficiency improvement programs. Involved in job estimating and budgeting. Assisting in the development of long rang and short range Edutcatid / planning. Manages consultants working on projects for the division / High school equivalence diploma; department. Coordination of many major emergency cTracking projects. State of Florida, Department of 1 of numerous projects using numerous computer programs including PCTS, Education (G.E.D) EAMS,ERP Financials, ERP Time and Labor,PTA,along with various Microsoft Florida Department of Products such as Access and Project. Reviews designplans, permits and Transportation Maintenance of specifications and checks for constructibility. Traffic Course Certified Competent Person- During his previous roles as Chief and Assistant Superintendent for Miami- Sheeting and Shoring Dade Water & Sewer Department Water Transmission and Distribution Division, he oversaw daily operations of the Water Transmission & Certifications: Distribution Division which includes several sections, such as: System Water Distribution System Improvement & Relocation Section, Maintenance & Repair Section, Operator Level 1 Service Section, Support & Accountability Section, Data Management Unit, and Administration. Responsible for budgeting for the entire division Class "A” C.D.L. Driver License including operation and maintenance along with numerous capital with Tanker Endorsement projects. Responsible for making personnel related decisions as far as the hiring of employees and disciplinary decisions. Ensuring that regulatory FSAWWA (Florida Section- requirements are met and reported on in a timely manner including American Water Works health, safety and environmental requirements. Involved with numerous Association) large scale projects including the evaluation of the transmission system's PCCP evaluation and timely repairs so that catastrophic pipe failures can FWPCOA (Florida Water Pollution be avoided. Responsible for review of payments to other departments Control Operators Association) such as Miami-Dade County Public Works for paving and Solid Waste for landfill charges. Responsible for evaluation of the distribution system Key Qualifications: including leak detection, water pressure problems, fire protection issues • Former WAS D's Water Chief and moving forward with timely infrastructure replacements. Responsible Transmission & Distribution for making sure employees are properly trained and safety requirements Division are followed. Over his career, Mr. Mathews worked on WASDs 6 water • Hundreds of Thousands of pumping stations doing various repairs. dollar savings to the district • Over 200 Miles of water pipes Relevant Project Expeence: installed/rehabbed Inspection,evaluation and repairs of approximately 120 miles Pre-Stressed • Water and Wastewater Concrete Cylinder Pipelines (PCCP) in Miami-Dade County ranging in Operations Expert sizes from 36" to 96". • Coordination with the City of Approximately $90 million spent for this project during my tenure. This Miami Beach for numerous included open cut repairs, carbon fiber repairs, Pipe Diver and Smart Ball water transmission projects evaluations, fiber optic monitoring of most problematic pipelines. • Budgeting water division including capital improvement Port Miami Projects-Miami-Dade County, Florida projects Mr. Mathews worked in the field installing numerous water mains, fire hydrants,services to the bulkheads along with metering stations on Lummus CIF and Dodge Island. More recently Mr. Mathews' GIS crew, surveyed the NG N E R t NG ROUP, P.A. entire port due to the minimal accessibility of or useful as-builts of the water 112 y / /' o / / /�,� ,..,. "%.:/ / .%/ „A,,:,: ,...., sr,/r./'. , v.., ,.,v,,.:�. ..:., r.:,:: 41/910,10$07---T ..,/.r./..J /� ../1,..._.. ,., r Wi'7,41 9d / SGt /�/�/ h u�0i<n { Tab 2 2 Team Qualifications Resumes and fire system. Him and the crew made numerous emergency repairs to their pipe lines on a job order basis. Leak Detection Program-Miami-Dade County, Florida Miami Dade County has one of the highest rated leak detection programs in the nation. The program consisted of various loggers,fixed networks,lift and shift crews,and conventional leak detection to name a few.Approximately 8,206 miles of pipe were evaluated each cycle. Dual Feed Water Main Program-Miami-Dade County, Florida Managed project where there were existing water mains in the alley and water mains also located in the front of the homes. Plumbers were brought in to relocate consumer lines from the rear of the properties to the front. The old undersized alley mains were then cut, plugged and abandoned. This project was done with contractors, consultants and in house crews. Water Main Replacement Program-Miami-Dade County, Florida Evaluated undersized,leaking,old water mains and prioritized their replacement. If the estimated raw construction costs were under the cap for the State of Florida Sunshine Law the water mains were constructed by in house crews which were under my supervision. If the project was over the cap the project would be sent out to a contractor for construction. In house crews install /replace approximately 70,000' of water mains per year. Pipe Bursting of Undersized Water Mains-Miami-Dade County, Florida Evaluated and managed all undersized 2" water mains to see if they could be replaced by the pipe bursting method. If the water main was a candidate for this method, it would be pipe burst by in house crews under my supervision. In house crews replace approximately 6,000' of 2" water mains by pipe bursting per year. Lead Horn Service Replacement Program-Miami-Dade County, Florida As repair crews find a lead horn or lead service, the as-builts of the area / development are reviewed. An inspector is sent to look in every meter box in the area to see if any of the services had already been renewed. The services that had not been renewed are then replaced. As-Builts to GIS - Project Manager-Miami-Dade County, Florida This was a project to stream line the as-builts conversion to GIS. Worked with consultants to speed up as-built records and converting them to GIS. This was especially important due to raped development and Consent Decree. WASD Water Transmission & Distribution Division-Assistant Superintendent-Miami-Dade County, Florida Supervise, coordinate and plan numerous tasks and projects within the Water Distribution Division including both new construction and maintenance. Responsible for long range planning and budgeting of future projects regarding water and sewer pipeline construction projects. Ensuring that the departmental policies and procedures are followed. Assisting in the ordering of equipment and materials that are needed to maintain the distribution system. Responsible for the coordination of various road projects with State, County and other entities that need to have our utilities relocated or adjusted in order to complete their work. Oversees Maintenance Scheduler\ Planner and reviews construction costs estimates and work schedules for contractors. Oversees GIS Unit, Utility Location Units, Small Equipment Repair Shop and Welding Shop. 113 A yr ,, !r r r ! \ \ „,,,,,,,„ J ,,,, :. -, ' ' g' ' 1 f ... 1- _Aja_ qT�C'" James A. Saren , , Wastewater Collection System E r, �� O&M z Mr.Saren has over 42 years of utility engineering,construction management and contracts administration experience in WASD's Wastewater collection and Transmission Line Division (WCTLD). Mr.Saren served for over nineteen Years of Experience: (19) years as the assistant superintendent for WASD's WCTLD managing 42 the construction of over 200 miles of force mains and gravity sewers throughout his career. He is fully familiarized with OSHA construction safety Education: regulations and with Miami Dade's Permitting and Procurement Process. High School Milford Mr. Saren was part of the team that lead the repair efforts of a 54" sewer Connecticut force main at the South end of South Beach., where we a contingency plan was implemented to re-route all sewer flows from the beach to an Certifications: Florida NASSCO old 36" outfall around 79th St. utilizing Miami Beach's valves and Pump PACP Stations. By reducing about 25 million gallons of sewage into Government • Cut and the adjacent beaches Mr. Saren's Division had won a NACO award. North American Society for Trenchless Technology, VA He has also wide experience in managing Infiltration/Inflow(I/I)contractors WASD Supervisor Program, FL including: Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), Cured in Place Pipe p g (CIPP), Manholes Repairs, Sectionals, Dig & Replace. He has worked in American Water Works the development on WASD's I/I database that serves as the tracking tool Association, for work order status. FW&PCOA, Wastewater Collection Technician Relevant Project Expeence: WASD $200M Infiltration/Exfiltration/Inflow (I/E/1) Improvement Program - FW&PCOA Region VII Instructor 1/I Specialist-Miami-Dade County, FL The Miami-Dade Sanitary Sewer Infiltration/Exfiltration/Inflow Improvement Key Qualifications: Program's goal was to significantly reduce the amount of flow entering • Former Assistant the wastewater collection/treatment system. The program provided Superintendent for WASD's sufficient system capacity to meet growth requirement for land Wastewater Collection and development, maximized the utilization of local businesses, and provided Transmission Line Division increased opportunities for minority participation in county contracts. The • Extensive experience with program was monitored by both state and federal agencies to determine WASD for the last 36 years, compliance with negotiated contracts with Miami-Dade. dealing with Infiltration and Inflow (I/I), pipelines, and WASD's $2.4B Program and Construction Management (PMCM) for the 9 g pump stations Wastewater System Priority Projects - Senior Construction Manager - • W and WW operations Miami-Dade County, Florida expert, SSES expert Senior Construction Manager for the Wastewater Collection and • Managed multiple Transmission System (WCTS) Task. The PMCM Team is assisting the Miami- Infiltration/Inflow Contracts Dade Water and Sewer Department providing Program and Construction • Managed the repair of Management Services Related to the Wastewater System Priority Projects, multiple cross sectional including WAS D's third Consent Decree with the United States Environmental connection Protection Agency (USEPA). Mr. Saren was Senior Construction Manager • Trenchless Technologies for a total of fifty-two (52) Force Mains and forty-one (41) Pump Station projects. WASD Wastewater collection and Transmission Line Division (WCTLD) Superintendent-Miami-Dade County, FL ali Mr. Saren managed the construction of the following WASD's projects NG t N E E R I NG GROUP, �.,4. while supervising over 120 staff members: 114 Tab 2 • Team Qualifications � s Resumes • Repair/Replacement of 6-Inch air vent on 90-inch outfall effluent line, north district Al A at Haulover Beach. • Installation of 48-Inch valve at NE 156TH ST/Biscayne BLVD on 48th inch FM in order to isolate flows. • Replacement of 10-Inch Asbestos Cement (AC) FM from PS 445TH West to NW 207th ST and NW 30th Ave. • Replacement of 10-Inch AC FM from Blvd and US 1 North to SW 160th ST and SW 99th Ave. • Replacement of approximately 9,045 LF of 8, 12 and 16-Inch of AC FM. PS 891ST to SW 108TH ST to SW 127TH Ave, then SW 108TH ST to SW 88TH ST. • Replacement of 24-Inch sewer aerial crossing at 65th NE 202nd Ter. • Replacement of 1,500 LF 8-Inch AC FM from PS 11132nd at Homestead Air Force Base (HAFB) to MH 311 (HAFB) Saint to Blvd. • Rehabilitation and replacement of 3,300 LF of 54-inch PCCP on West Flagler ST between 78th place and PS 187th. • Replacement of 1,400 LF 12-Inch Ductile Iron (DI) FM NE 207th ST and NE 34th Ave East to PS 464. • Replacement of 8-Inch Cast Iron (CI) FM from Mag Meter Station "M-6" to existing 20-Inch FM located on NW 79th Ave at approximately NW 41st ST. • Replacement of approximately 4,200 LF of 12-Inch AC FM from SW 132nd ST and SW 87th Ave north to SW 120th ST and SW 87th Ave. • Replacement of approximately 11,400 LF of 10-Inch AC FM from P/S 709. • Replacement of existing 20-Inch FM from NE 168th ST and NE 35th Ave south to pump station 426 located on NE 163rd ST, east of NE 35th Ave. • Replacement of 1000 LF 12-Inch steel FM aerial crossing on the north side of the Bear Cut Bridge on the Rickenbacker CSWY • Rehabilitation of exiting 54-Inch FM by cured-in place liner at NW 67th Avenue and 2nd Street to NW 37th Avenue and 11th Street. • Rehabilitation of Pump station 301-350 Sunny Isles Blvd.42-Inch pipe,manhole#1 to wet well pump station 301, manhole #1 to manhole #2,rehabilitation with Hobas pipes or cured in place liner. Manhole #1A, #2,and #6, rehabilitation with fiberglass inserts. 42-Inch pipe, manhole #4 to manhole #2, repair and rehabilitation pipe joint leaks with internal mechanical seals. • Excavated, exposed, and removed pipe for the purpose of internal inspection on the 48-Inch outfall, east of Collins Avenue and Sunny Isles Blvd. • Rehabilitation/repair or existing Miami River post-siphon chamber and associated 72-inch pipe at NW 4th ST/ NW north River Drive. • Rehabilitation/repair of existing Hydraulic Chamber and associated lines at NW 2nd ST/NW south river drive. • Rehabilitation/repair of existing 42-Inch interceptor and existing sanitary manholes at NW 7th ST/NW 13th Ave. • Installation of two 48-InchX30-Inch Tapping Saddled on 48-Inch outfall for the purpose of inspection. First location-east of intercostal waterway north of 163rd street.Second location-east of Collins Avenue and 163rd street. • Replacement of 10-Inch AC force main from PS 445TH West to NW 207th ST and NW 30th Ave. • Replacement of 10-Inch AC force main from Blvd and US 1 North to SW 160th ST and SW 99th Ave. 115 •Medco ,.. - \-; I iii r ...., ,,,,,,, ,,,, ...v. / err/i,,Gr�r<' ,. , ,AI Charles 1. Sutton Wastewater Pum in. /Lift StationsExpert le- ,,, Water Pumping Stations Expert 1 °` CIP/O&M Mr. Sutton has over thirty-four (34) years of progressive experience managing the operations, maintenance, and construction of the Sewage Collection System and Wastewater Pumping Facilities for Miami- Years of Experience: Dade Water & Sewer. During his tenure at Miami-Dade Water and Sewer 34 Department (WASD) Education: South Dade Senior High School, Mr. Sutton has worked on various projects in varied in scope and Miami, FL g complexity. His knowledge and expertise in the procedures and protocol for the county provides exceptional value to our team. As one of many Certifications: examples, Mr.Sutton participated in the repair efforts of a 54" sewer force State of Florida Certified main at the South end of South Beach.As part of the Pump Station Division, Underground Utility and Mr. Sutton was tasked with supplying and operating portable pumps and Excavation Contractor, CUC tankers to assist in reducing overflow due to rerouting of flows during the 1224548 repair process. R.S Means, Mechanical and Prior to joining 300 Engineering Team, Mr. Sutton's entire career has been Electrical Estimating working for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department. R.S Means, Managing Facilities Construction and Maintenance Relevant Project Expeence: National Safety Council Work zone Conce is Levels III Assistant Maintenance Superintendent for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer p Department(WASD) Effective Maintenance Mana gement, Universityof Responsible for the operation and maintenance of 514 wastewater pump gstations varyingin size from 5 horse to 900 horse power. Co-responsible for Wisconsin the operation and maintenance of all the 1,046 wastewater pump stations, Key Qualifications: varying in size from 5 to 900 horsepower. Responsible for preparing and • Former Assistant Maintenance managing an operations and maintenance budget which for fiscal year Superintendent for WASD's 2014-2015 exceeded 5 million dollars. Operated the section to be able to Pump Station Division close out the year on target. Responsible for assisting in the preparation • Responsible for the O&M of and management of Divisional Operation and Maintenance Budget 514 WASD's PSs, from 5 to 900 which exceeded 29 million dollars for fiscal year 2014-2015 Responsible hp for assisting in the preparation and management of Capital Projects • Responsible for preparing and budget which exceeded 20 million for fiscal year 2014-2015. Responsible managing multi-million dollar for the collection of data and preparation of documentation to assure budgets for the WASD's Pump compliance of regulations set forth by the Department of Environmental Station Division Resources Management, Florida Department of Environmental Protection • Knowledgeable of WASD's and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Facilities Manager for a asset management systems 15,000 square ft maintenance building which has 90 employees reporting such as the Enterprise Asset for duty on a 24-hour basis. Responsible for aesthetic, maintenance and Management System (EAMS), security of facility. GIS, DOLFIN • Familiar with regulations for Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer pumping stations set forth by Department(WASD) the DERM, FDEP and USEPA Supervised fifty-two (52) staff, including four field supervisors involved in • Extensive knowledge of the maintenance, operation and upgrading of 238 wastewater pumping WASD's SCADA system stations. Scheduling of preventive, predictive and corrective (Electrical Mechanical and Structural) maintenance workload for 238stations. Slk pumping stations maintained by four operations and maintenance units. ENGIN E R I NG G ROUP, P.A. Assisted in the preparation and maintenance of annual budget, to assure 116 2 .2 Team Qualifications Via, d Resumes no excess expenditures. Analyzed cost and production, to assure maintenance activities were completed by utilizing the most cost effective means possible without compromise to equipment reliability or projected life cycle. Maintained divisional database detailing assets contained within each of the 960 wastewater pumping stations maintained by Miami-Dade Water&Sewer. Facilities coordinator and responsible for the daily maintenance and security of 36th Street Maintenance Facility. Water Distribution Supervisor for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department(WASD) Supervised thirty-seven (37) staff to include five field supervisors involved in the construction, repair and maintenance of municipal sewage collection system. Supervised eighteen (18) in the new construction and repair of gravity and force mains varying in size from 8 inches to 54 inches. Evaluated, trained, counseled employees of various classification i.e., Pipefitter Supervisor, Pipefitter, Automotive Equipment Operator, Maintenance Repairer, Semi-Skilled Labored, on regular basis involving safety, productivity and performance. Pipe-fitter Supervisor for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department(WASD) Supervised a five (5) staff team, tasked with maintaining and repairing force mains, gravity mains and associated structures within municipal sewage collection system. Planned and coordinated repair and new construction job, including procurement of materials, maintenance of traffic permits and equipment. Repaired and maintained force mains, gravity mains, and associated structures within municipal sewage collection system. Upgraded and repaired piping, equipment and structures associated with wastewater pumping station.Calculated grades and elevation utilizing laser and level technology. Pipe-fitter for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department(WASD) Repaired and maintained force mains,gravity mains and associated structures within municipal sewage collection system. Upgraded and repaired piping, equipment and structures associated with wastewater pumping station. Calculated grades and elevation utilizing laser and level technology Maintenance Repairer for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department(WASD) Assisted higher Tradesmen in the maintenance and repairer of municipal sewage collection and water distribution systems. Semi-Skilled Laborer for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department(WASD) Assisted higher Tradesmen in the maintenance and repair of municipal sewage collection and water distribution systems. 1! 117 r, ,,/, /u u. ! / .. .., ,..._... v 1 r a //nl///H N//N. ,....,// //r�� , nrni// /,,,/ ./r/, .,, / /�// 001/0/4//10,/'I�// ,„7,7774,",, /rr !! ,/ ,. ,, /, _ , r: /�' J ,,,,,,gho � / /, //.r/,r/l;,, , ,,,,,,,,, /..r,,,/i r,l: J/,NJJ<h,.r,/,.,/rr✓//!�J,,n //.:,.:r /,/: /,'////,///e)//,/J//i 9/ r ,K l \ i irk . 01i - Grf - ..... , , 4-, ''''t" . ' ' . , \ ,-:' -''' A ri - �< /� *.rte ,� .,"`,"% ,4 Kenia Gonzalez., r Wastewater Pum n /Lift Station Expert __ p Master.Planning/Hycfraulic Modeling/Systems \ , i s Expansion .......- Ms. Gonzalez has over forty four (44) years of experience in the areas of ,\111/ 14----- ,-- wastewater and civil engineering. Moreover, she worked for the Miami- '- - Dade Water and Sewer Department's (WASD) Pump Station Compliance Years of Experience: Section during the past fifteen (15) years. Ms. Gonzalez conducted system 44 monitoring for sewage pump station operation and recommended corrective actions. She investigated possible breaks in the gravity system Education: of sewage pump stations using SCADA, requested TV inspections and BS Mechanical Engineering, tracked the completion and effectiveness of the proposed repairs. In Havana Technical Institute, addition, she conducted engineering studies for pump stations that are 1969 not in compliance with the USEPA regulations. She is fully familiarized with the Miami-Dade County permitting process and with WASD's standard Key Qualifications: processes and procedures. • Former Engineer of WASD s Pump Station Compliance Relevant Project Expeence: Section WASD's $2.4B Program and Construction Management (PMCM) for the • Expert in reviewing Pump Wastewater System Priority Projects - Pump Station Senior Engineer - Statton's operating Miami-Dade County, Florida conditions The PMCM Team is assisting the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department • Knowledgeable of providing Program and Construction Management Services Related to Cost Effective Solutions the Wastewater System Priority Projects, including WASD's third Consent (Operation and Decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Maintenance, Infiltration/ The program includes a total of fifty two (52) Force Mains projects and forty Inflow, Force Mains, Rehab, one (41) Pump Station projects. Ms. Gonzalez validated over twenty (20) New) pump stations projects providing a Remedial Action Plan and Preliminary • Hydraulic Calibrations and Engineering Reports to be implemented in order to bring these pump Rainfall data stations into compliance according to the 10-hour NAPOT criteria. She • Coordination with MD-RER also performs design drawing reviews to ensure design requirements are • Engineering Reports (Scope met. of Works, Schedules, Fees) • Proficient at collecting WASD's $215M Pump Station Improvement Program (PSIP)- Pump Station Sewer System data Senior Engineer-Miami-Dade County, Florida Senior Engineer for the upgrade of the Wastewater Collection and Transmission System (WCTS) including pump stations and force mains pursuant to which each pump station has to be certified as capable of meeting a nominal average pump operating time (NAPOT) of less than or equal to 10 hours per day. Pump stations exceeding the NAPOT criteria must have a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and no certificate of occupancies can be issued for connections to the WCTS upstream of that pump station until the RAP recommendations are implemented. The program aims to bring into compliance 113 sewage pump stations that do not comply with the NAPOT and Peak Flow Criterion. This program is comprised of four main phases: 1) Planning and Engineering which includes the basis of design report development for pump station and force main projects; 2) Design Management of 8 Design Consultants; 3) Construction Management of multiple pump station and force main contractors through the County's MCC 7040 procurement method; and, 4) Infiltration and Inflow Management which entails the management of 4 II II different contractors for Manhole,Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES), ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. C CIPP, and Dig and Replace (D&R) contracts. 118 . . . . . .. _, Tab 2 .2 : Team Qualifications Resumes WASD's Pump Station Compliance Section-Senior Pump Station Engineer-Miami-Dade County, Florida Ms. Gonzalez conducted system monitoring for pump station operation. Recommended corrective actions to ensure pump stations operate under the regulatory parameter. This included the investigation of high hour stations and performance of an evaluation to determine the possible causes of the high hours (Operation & Maintenance, Infiltration/Inflow (I/I), Rain Dependent (I/I), SCADA failure, valve setting, etc.). Coordinated I/I repairs with the Sewage Collection Division. Selected pump stations that require I/I repairs based on operational records. She requested flow isolation or Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey (SSES) to determine the severity of the possible breaks. Ms. Gonzalez also tracked the completion of repairs of those defects previously identified and evaluated the effectiveness of the repairs. She prepared System Monitoring Reports for the Pump Station Maintenance Division. She also selected pump stations that should be monitored in the short or long term due to the increase of the runtime and investigated the reason of such increase using operational records and recommended required actions. Ms. Gonzalez conducted engineering studies of pump stations that are out of compliance and proposed a remedial action plan to correct the problems contributing to the pump station being out of compliance. She prepared engineering reports necessary to implement the remedial action plans proposed for out-of-compliance stations.She obtained present operation data from SCADA,ORACLE databases and field inspection and tests and also performed hydraulic and mechanical calculations for future operating conditions. Ms. Gonzalez evaluated the operation of the particular pump station in relation to the rest of the wastewater transmission system. She selected pumps that could meet the operation demands of the system and keep the station in compliance with regulatory criteria. Ms. Gonzalez developed system curves for all possible operating conditions making sure the specified pumps would perform adequately during extreme conditions (peak flow and pressure). 1! 119 , . ` .- �,, i/s��,� 6r F/r!r rAr/i.a4; r G/i6�q r,,,///�//� � ��'`,. , „, , , , k,7„,.,..;,, , q,. 9 ,, , /, / - ,, 4 , , t. I 14 r ,,,,' / , , ) 1 _ %rG If,'7 � /„Nio r ) Rafael BPE Water DDesign Eflgineer exper, loo ' Wastewater Collection Design Engineer E xpert Design/Permitting/Procurement Leader , Al Mr. Ballesteros has over 40 years of utility engineering, management, and professional administrative experience. In his 30 years working with the d Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department, he was responsible for the Years of Experience: 40 design of large concrete and ductile iron transmission mains;coordinating and implementing Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Standards Specification, rules and regulations. He has extensive experience in planning,evaluating Education: and analyzing large scale development proposals for water and sewer BS, Civil Engineer Technology, service requirements and reviewed water and sewer plans of proposed Florida International University, developments. Mr. Ballesteros created specifications and standards for Miami, Florida water and wastewater distribution systems governed by the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department; coordinated and interacted with Florida Certifications` Department of Transportation, Miami Dade-CountyPublic Works and Professional Engineer, FL numerous municipalities throughout Miami-Dade County including the Supervisor Leadership and Cityof Coral Gables. Management Certification Program Relevant Project Experience: WASD'S Installation of 16-Inch Water Main along NW 36th Street from Curtiss Professional Certificate in Parkway to NW 42nd Ave (N. Lejeune Rd) North of Miami International Project Management Airport(MIA)-Engineer of Record-Miami-Dade County, Florida Miami Dade County Engineer of Record for the replacement of an undersized 8-inch Cast Supervisor Certification Iron (CI) Water Main with a new 16-Inch Ductile Iron (DI) Water Main. As Program part of the Agreement with the City of Miami Springs, the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department is required to upgrade the water system to increase water pressure and provide optimum fire flow protection. The Key Qualifications: 8,900 LF water main will run along NW 36th Street from Curtis Parkway to • Over 170 miles of pipeline NW 42nd Ave (N. Lejeune Rd). Services provided by 300 included, but design/rehabilitation were not limited to design, permitting, cost estimating, preparation of experience (8-inch to 96- technical specifications, utility coordination, site inspections, scheduling, inch) coordination with stakeholders (City of Miami Springs, FDOT, etc) limited • Over 55 miles of pipeline procurement and construction support services. construction experience Served as Head of WASD's WASD'S - CL-1 Pump Station 1 to CL-2 60-inch Forcemain Connection Utility liaison section for MD Preliminary Alternative Pipe Route Analysis-Senior Professional Engineer Utility Development Division -Miami-Dade County, Florida • Served as Head of WASD s Project Engineer for the 60-inch forcemain connection. The proposed Plans Review Section for interconnection evaluated in this analysis would allow for wastewater flow MD Utility Development from Pump Station 1 (PS 1) and Pump Station 2 (PS 2) to be diverted to the Division proposed WDWRP and the SDWWTP. The project involved performing a • Served as Assistant to preliminary alternative force main route analysis so that PS 1 can pump the Head of Utility Design west to an existing 42-inch force main which discharges at a manhole Section, MD Water and at NW 13th Avenue and NW 6th Street. Services provided included Sewer Department, identifying Municipal jurisdictions, identifying existing or required Right- Engineering Division of-Way, identifying the points of connection of the proposed force • Seasoned Professional to main, determine its size (60-inch) and determined the best route for the Update CIP proposed force main in terms of constructability, prepared an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, determined a list of required permits, and prepared a preliminary project schedule for 5,700 feet of 60-inch illk force main near the Downtown Miamiarea. ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. i 120 Ta b 2 2 • Team Qualifications Resumes WASD'S Installation of 36-Inch Water Main along NW 106th Street from NW 107th Avenue to the Intersection of NW 87th Avenue and NW South River Drive- Engineer of Record-Miami-Dade County, Florida Engineer of Record for the replacement of the design of a 36-inch Ductile Iron (DI) Main. The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department is required to upgrade the water system to increase water pressure and provide optimum fire flow protection. The 11,000 LF water main will run along NW 106th Street from NW 107th Ave to the Intersection of NW 87th Avenue and NW South River Drive,within the Town of Medley. Project involves the design of a micro- tunneling crossing Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway. Services provided by 300 included, but were not limited to design, permitting, cost estimating, preparation of technical specifications, utility coordination, site inspections, scheduling, coordination with the Town of Medley, limited procurement and construction support services. WASD's 48-inch Water Main Interconnect in the Central East Area(Downtown Miami)-Senior Professional Engineer -Miami-Dade County, Florida Services provided included identify Municipal jurisdictions, identify existing or required Right-of-Way, identify the points of connection of the proposed force main,determine its size (48-Inch) and determine the best route for the proposed force main in terms of constructability, to prepare an opinion of probable cost of the selected route, to determine a list of required permits, and to prepare a preliminary project schedule for 7,300 feet of 48-inch Water main in the Miami Downtown area. Performed utility coordination including requesting a design ticket through Sunshine State One Call of Florida, obtaining utility as-builts for the project area, field reconnaissance, cost estimating,scheduling,and report writing. Prepared preliminary conceptual drawings showing all the utilities information and the proposed route on an aerial photograph. WASD's, Utility Development Division-Senior Professional Engineer, Head of Utility Liaison Section-Miami-Dade County, Florida Responsible for the administration and supervision of the Utility Liaison Section. Supervised the work performed by one Professional Land Surveyor, four Engineers, two draftsmen and one Real Estate Officer. Coordinated with Florida Department of Transportation, Miami Dade County Public Work Department and other Municipalities and Public Work Departments on proposed roadway improvement in the Miami Dade County. Evaluated opportunities for water or sewer System Betterment within the project limits. Assisted in developing programs and projects to implement the countywide master plan for the water supply and sewage systems. Responsible for the work done by the Real Estate Officer conducting negotiations for the acquisition of real property and lease hold interests, to obtain easements for proposed mains, and giving easements to other utilities. Performed field inspections and coordinated with WASD inspectors on the installation of mains. Noteworthy Projects: • Turnpike Interchange at NW 74 St. (FDOT) • Interchange of SR 836 and SR 826 (FDOT) • NW 74 St from NW 67 Ave to NW 87 Ave (FDOT) • NW 57 Ave from Okeechobee Rd. to NW 135 St. (FDOT) • NW 74 St from NW 87 Ave to NW 107 Ave (DCPW) • City of Miami Street Car Mr. Ballesteros served as Project Manager for the County's Needs Assessment Program (NAP) and General Obligation Bond (GOB) program, both intended to identify, design and construct water and sewer main within targeted areas of the community. 2j! 121 1b :.,.:. / .i, ' ,//,//44/4,.!,. ... ,..in. i /irir�i:b;./i /I /i vu/I/%/%/j rip. ..:./,_ . / �� /1 � �1 , ,,� : 9 , i %/, 4 l��.,./I, �//'/ dii : iso;�.,n ,ti :,r... h/..:{,,,, ., ,.... ,{. iy!;%;,,J / / i: .ri;: i��ii i/ F. ;. Ny:,/i � / / ,.:. :.....::✓iii..,..i.Li�/„ ,:i�,.:;,,41 J..�/:.!/d./G i /i,i!r/ i/ ._...n!r 1,.>;,,:., "..: .. ::. / 4 71,7:" V‘ \ \ rt.* 1 eel Ir. , 4,.. ..;,„,, , , ' ,1 4-/ t... ..,, , 4,,,,,, ATS Janine Alexander, PE � Design/Permitting/Procurement Water Distribution Design Expert ,,,,, Ms. Alexander has over 20 years of water and wastewater utility experience including project management for the design of new facilities, relocations of existing facilities,utility coordination,permitting,construction Years of Experience. administration, construction management, inspections, and certifications 20 for numerous public and private sector projects. Education: • BS, Environmental Engineering, Relevant Project Expeence: University of Central Florida, WM Replacement Program: Hollywood Blvd. to Sheridan Street, N. Dixie 1996 Hwy. to Federal Hwy. (US 1), City of Hollywood, FL Senior Project Manager for design, permitting and CA services for the Certifications: replacement of 100,000 feet of 2 to 16-inch PVC/DIP water mains, fire Professional Engineer, Florida, hydrants,and water service lines,including relocation of existing meters for No. 59244, 2003 157 lots in residential and commercial streets and alleyways. The project e-Railsafe Certification, 2017 also includes three trenchless FEC RR crossings at Polk, Johnson, and Taft Streets,pavement restoration and MOT plans. Permitting includes Broward Roadway Worker Protection Co. ROW Use for N. 21st Ave., FEC RR ROW, FDOT Utilityfor US 1, Broward (RWP) Certification, 2017 NPDES Certified Inspector, 2005 Co. Health/DOH and City Bldg. Department permitting. CA services & 2012 include meetings, shop drawing review, RFIs, review and approval of change orders, field reviews, record drawings, clearances and substantial NASSCO Pipeline Assessment and final inspections. Certification Program (PACP), Lateral Assessment WM Replacement Program: Hollywood Blvd. to Sheridan Street, Federal Certification Program (LACP), Hwy. (US 1)to the Intracoastal Waterway, City of Hollywood, FL & Manhole Assessment Senior Project Manager for design, permitting and CA services. The water Certification Program (MACP) main improvements consist of 99,700 feet of 2-inch, 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, Certified, 12-inch, and 16-inch water mains along local City streets, rear easements U-714-06021906, 2014 and paved alleys. The existing utilities will be replaced with new PVC/ NASSCO's ITC Program for DIP water mains, isolation valves, fire hydrants, water services, and water CIPP, certified ITC Inspector, meters (in some cases). Where water meter and boxes are located in CIPP-714-0201409, 2014 rear easements, these will be relocated to the front within the City ROW. Permitting included FDOT Utility permitting, Broward Co. Health/DOH OSHA 30 Hour Training for and City Bldg. Department permitting. CA services include meetings, Construction Safety and shop drawing review, RFIs, review and approval of change orders, field Health, No. 36-601193051, 2014 reviews, record drawings, obtaining clearances, and substantial and final completion inspections. Key Qualifications: Port Miami Water Transmission and Distribution Systems Master Plan,Miami, • Design and permitting of y FL 100,000 fet of water mains • SCADA data acquisition Project Engineer for water transmission and distribution systems analyses and hydraulic modeling and master plan recommendations for Port Miami. Port Miami is experience using InfoWater existing water distribution deficiencies due to increase water demands due • Pump station flow analysis to ship filling activities and aged water distribution systems. Ms. Alexander • Coordination with oversaw the hydraulic modeling,field and SCADA data acquisition,model permitting agencies calibrations and identification of existing deficiencies and future capacity requirements necessary to maintain operations to multiple cruise ships during peak berthing periods. Additional services included extensive and detailed coordination with PortMiami, WASD, and design consultant staff TETRA TECH to expedite planning and design to meet conditions for 2018 facilities.The project includes multiple design scenarios modeled using InfoWater for 122 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes sizing of subaqueous large diameter transmission mains to provide future flows and adequate system pressures on the Port,cost estimates, phasing considerations,filling station and on site piping field verifications and evaluations for improvements and costing of system options as well as constructibility considerations at Port of Miami. Brackish Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water Treatment Plant No. 2, City Of Clearwater, FL Project manager and construction manager for 6.25 MGD, $30M brackish RO water treatment plant project. Responsible for day-to-day client and project team management and coordination for plant site, 17-offisite remote wells/wellfield and 64,625 linear feet of pipelines ranging from 3- to 22-inches in diameter. Managed overall project deliverables and budget, permitting (FDEP, ACOE, ERP, FDOT, and Pinellas County). Also served as the engineer or record and utility pipeline design leader for a total of 36,740 linear feet of piping including 8,020 linear feet 6-inch PVC; 14,680 linear feet of 8-inch PVC; and 3,190 linear feet of 12-inch PVC all installed via horizontal directional drill (25,880 linear feet PVC horizontal directional drill total with 433 linear feet subaqueous). Additional pipe includes 2,750 linear feet of 3-inch HDPE communication conduit,860 linear feet 8-inch,270 linear feet 10-inch, and 1,320 linear feet 14-inch DR-11 HDPE (5,200 linear feet HDPE horizontal directional drill total with 414 linear feet subaqueous). Project also includes 310 linear feet 6-inch PVC and 560 linear feet of 8-inch PVC, 130 linear feet of 8-inch dr-11 HDPE,30 linear feet of 8-inch dip, and 4,530 linear feet of 12-inch dip piping installed via open cut. Construction manager role began in 2013 for four contracts including plant,wells and two pipeline contracts. Engineering design, permitting, and bidding cost was $3.58 million. Construction cost is $35 million for RO plant,well sites and pipelines. East Las Olas Boulevard (SR 842) 12-inch FM Replacement, City of Ft. Lauderdale, FL Project Manager for design, permitting, bidding, and CA services for 280 feet of 18-inch DR-11 HDPE FMi in p p g- 1,775 feet of 16-inch DR-11 HDPE FM piping, 150 feet of 12-inch Protecto 401 lined DIP piping (aerial crossing of the Rio Navarro Canal), and stub-outs for future FM connections from existing lift stations on adjacent Isles. Permitting included FDOT utility, Broward Co. Health/DOH. The new FM piping will be installed via open trench construction with the existing 12-inch DIP FM piping grout filled and abandoned in place. Hollywood Boulevard Joint Project Agreement(JPA), N. 21st Avenue to City Hall, City of Hollywood, FL Senior Project Manager for design, permitting, bidding, and CA services for design, permitting and construction administration (CA) of 285 feet of 20-inch DR-11 HDPE casing pipe with 14-inch DR-11 carrier installed via HDD under the Florida East Coast (FEC) railroad ROW and 3,000 feet of existing 8-inch water main upsized to 12-inch water main, new fire hydrants/existing hydrant reconnections, new water services and meter reconnections and abandoning the existing 8-inch water main in place and grouting it in place. Permitting includes Broward Co. Health/DOH, Broward Co. ROW Use, Broward Co.Traffic Engineering, coordination with FDOT due to stormwater, hardscape and roadway improvements as part of the JPA project. Construction services include meetings, shop drawing reviews, RFIs, review and approval of change orders, field reviews, record drawings, obtaining clearances, substantial and final completions. Pump Stations D-10 and D-11 Flow Analysis and Redesign Project, City of Ft. Lauderdale, FL Project Manager for wastewater flow analysis due to increased land use densities from single family residential to condo and multifamily uses and evaluation of existing duplex pump stations and upstream influent manholes for rehabilitation or replacement for two existing City pump stations located adjacent to East Las Olas Blvd on the Isle of Venice (PS D-10) and Hendricks Isle (PS D-11). Preparation of preliminary design memorandum including findings and recommendations for rehabilitation and replacement and associated costs, and survey, design, permitting and construction administration services for the rehabilitation and removal and replacement of existing infrastructure in disrepair. The existing pump stations both have 6-inch force mains (FMs) that discharge into an existing gravity sewer system on East Las Olas Blvd. The material for the FMs will also be verified via subsurface utility excavations with recommendations being made for potential FM removal and/or replacement. 123 40111111111116. M/ r // .'.. ,1/1,/f;''';',11/.r/i.,. r/ ./,// ,/F! .: , ' < / ,......,./4/1:4 r/./.r...l_. .� r „//i/r::,..,..':.:-.r / ,ul/N//1//r /, !,../L//,.,.I y��/ . . . . . u ,:> yy,///./ ,,„,/,',i�//�/,//(/////��/ , 15/ r - yi,/,Lru;prl,,: y/r'' �4,/,i1,,, ,� / ,:'t :,. nj/Gn5 J.E,/r/ij rru r,-n,,: ,, :.i//I/ / ///:/.�/rr/�/i/t.:: i% 1. "�,.r�„///"//,rir rr ;,,:li^ � ,.,: : f,r ,, r..,u._,,a/, r./////r a u:,h/ r7ln/ P v 5 / \\v\,\,,„/,,„r�i/,yu/�� /.,r ,:r. r;h¢ h/�'lii.,;�/ \V1 \ \ '''\ , ._..-• r „� r '. ti t a\ Fernando R. MiraIIes-WiIheIm ,,, , ,\1\q\\"\ Ph.D.,PE,BCEE,D.WRE,PMP,F.ASCE 4{, CIP Leader, CC/SLR/Adaptation/Resiliency ,,„ Exp ert, Water and Wastewater Hydraulic V. Engineer Expert Dr. Miralles is a hydrologist with over twenty (23) years of experience Years of Experience: as a researcher, consultant and academic in the field water supply ppy and sanitation. He has worked on problems involving surface and groundwater, physical, chemical and biological processes in aquatic Education: ecos stems, climate-h drolo -ve etation interactions in wetlands BS, Mechanical Engineering y y gy g , water resources management in urban and agricultural watersheds, Universidad Simon Bolivar, stormwater management and water qualitycontrol. Over his career, he Caracas, Venezuela, 1987 g has consulted with USAID, IDB, CAF and the World Bank on topics dealing MS, University of California, with climate change,sustainability and water.He has also been a member Irvine CA, 1989 of the faculty at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern 1 Ph.D. Water Resources University, the University of Miami, Florida International University and the Massachusetts Institute of University of Maryland. He has been a Principal Investigator in over$160M Technology (MIT), Cambridge in projects funded by US and international agencies. He has conducted MA, 1992 and/or directed climate change and water resources projects in over twenty (20) countries in the 5 continents. Certifications: Professional Engineer (PE), Relevant Project Expeence: Florida UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Professor, Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Key Qualifications: Executive Director, NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites • Master Planningand CIP p Executive Director of the NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate development and Satellites (CICS), a national consortium of twenty (20) institutions • Climate Change and Sea spanning academia, non-profit, public and private sector organizations Level Rise Adaptation Plans p g p g p focused on research, education and outreach/engagement in the • Water Infrastructure Design use of satellite observations and Earth System models to advance the and Evaluation national li t climate e mission, including monitoring, understanding, predicting • Water Resources/Storm and communicating information on climate variability, climate change Water Expert and sea level rise. CICS is based at the University of Maryland, College • Hydraulic Modeling Park, where Dr. Miralles holds an appointment as Professor in the Dept. of Expertise Atmospheric and Oceanic Science. At CICS, Dr. Miralles leads a group of • Environmental 150 between academic faculty,research scientists and technical support Management staff. In these positions, Dr. Miralles has led the development of strategic • Business Processes plans, budget formulation and execution, fundraising and annual Optimization reporting to shareholders. Dr. Miralles teaches and supervises graduate • Professor at Univ. of students in the areas of ecosystems hydrology, sustainability modeling Maryland, Florida Int'l and water resources systems. Dr. Miralles lead recent efforts (2014, 2016) Univ., Univ. of Miami, and of obtaining cooperative agreements with NOAA for CICS for the period Northeastern Univ. 2015-2020 for$93M, and NASA for the period 2017-2022 for$65M. In both of these awards, he serves as Principal Investigator: Member, National Academies Committee on Independent Science Review of the Everglades Restoration Project(CISRERP) Dr. Miralles is the lead for sea level rise and climate change in charge of reviewing and evaluating progress towards the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (CERP) being carried out by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District.In this W capacity, he oversees efforts to incorporate measures to adapt to rising ENGINEERING GROUP, P.A. ENGINEERING Wsea levels and changing patterns in precipitation and evapotranspiration 124 in CERP projects. 2 .2 Team Resumes Other important projects include: Integrated Urban Water Planning and Management(Mexico):developed a case study in integrated urban water planning/management (IUWP) for Mexico City's water system. Water Security and Infrastructure for Development(Regional LAC): performed an assessment of water security in the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region,with a focus on infrastructure needs, planning and management in key water-using sectors. -INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK(IDB) Senior Advisor, Division of Water and Sanitation Hired by the IDB to develop a portfolio of water resources technical cooperation (TC) grants and knowledge projects. Served as lead specialist for water resources management and climate change adaptation within the Division of Water and Sanitation (WSA) for the IDB's 26 countries served in the LAC region. Managed a portfolio of 10+ TC projects totaling $20M+ in the area of water resources and climate adaptation. Lead for strategic planning for WSA Division of IDB in water resources and adaptation. He is the lead developer of the Hydro- BID system for the Bank, and serves as liaison with the Bank's other units in issues related to water resources and climate adaptation. Overall, he has been Team Leader for technical cooperation projects (15 since 2010) and team member for water resources and adaptation lead in loan operations in Peru, Venezuela, Trinidad & Tobago, and Brazil. Team member of several bank-wide initiatives (climate change, biodiversity, emerging and sustainable cities,regional policy dialogs). Lead contributor to bilingual IDB blogs (Volvamos a la fuente and Let's talk climate change / Hablemos de cambio climatico). Some of the most relevant projects include: Urban flooding and climate change adaptation (Uruguay): climate change adaptation study for the urban catchment of the Pantanoso River.To define the vulnerability of the population and the material assets to climate change and to to strengthen the capacity to adaptively respond. Urban flooding as a result of sea level rise in Port of Spain (Trinidad and Tobago): possible impacts from sea level rise, with particular focus on issues and areas of concern in the island. Specific issues that were evaluated using a simulation model of sea driven coastal flooding were flooding extents, depths and durations were simulated. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Professor(on leave, since May 2010, tenured), Dept. of Earth and Environment; Associate Professor(tenured), Dept. of Earth and Environment; Associate Professor(tenured), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering • EVR5935 Sustainability Modeling (Spring 2010,Spring 2013, Spring 2014, Spring 2015) • C W R5140C Ecohydrology (Fall 2005, Fall 2008, Fall 2009, Fall 2014) • CWR5251 Environmental Hydraulics (Fall 2006) • CWR3103 Water Resources Engineering (Spring 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2009) • CWR61 17 Statistical Hydrology (Spring 2009) • EGN5455 Numerical Methods in Engineering (Fall 2007, Fall 2008) Director, NASA WaterSCAPES University Research Center(URC) Dr. Miralles served as Director of a NASA-funded URC (WaterSCAPES), focused on research, education and outreach activities in the area of Ecosystems and Climate Change. This URC has 12 other investigators, and approximately 25 students working on different aspects of climate-hydrology- vegetation interactions such as remote sensing of water levels and vegetation in wetlands, modeling of coupled ecological-hydrological spatiotemporal dynamics and field investigations of water, nutrient and biomass stocks and fluxes. 125 .. :..,// •.....'..,...„..,..�/:,.r;r v/r'�///1 1. -,,r , � . ,... ' .,[.,./.._r...n.....n..... ... r, / , r''7,777777„ �M / / , 6,/a/ 00,41#094,41g/b, ! , r ...,:,..: / M/r �p4,11/ ��%7/J .Lr. �m//4, /. l � / �/mnr�/��r / / / . / /% �r y/ / , a/wxn/Nr n r/n �lHII�//y!' r" /�lI.: . v/i c /g//!///N//*,/�/9r r,/r4144 1,/ �/lj,7/ ly� Cri�� .‘s l��4 , // \\N I f ,,,‘, �,„/'r 1.,\\\ � .,'e: • �^] :/r ,i r /rrr.,//,r/r Justin Voss, PE „, Master PlanninModeling/System \\\\ Ex'oqnsions/WdFer & Wastewater Hydraulic f Engineer Expert Mr. Voss is a hydraulics and hydrology technical professional. His primary Years of Experience: work experience is in hydraulic analyses, especially computer modeling of 12 hydraulic systems. He is familiar with EPA-SWMM,InfoSWMM,InfoSWMM 2D, Storm and Sanitary Analysis (formerly StormNet), PCSWMM, SewerGEMS, Education: XP-SWMM, and InfoWorks ICM software through his work on sanitary, BSE, Civil Engineering, University combined,and storm sewer projects,including flow monitoring,modeling, of Michigan, 2004 infiltration and inflow studies, and sewer evaluation surveys. He is also MSE, Civil Engineering, familiar with ArcMap, a platform for some modeling software. University of Michigan, 2005 Mr. Voss is responsible for completing transportation drainage and Certifications: open channel hydraulic analyses for clients such as the Michigan and Professional Engineer: Ohio Departments of Transportation. Tasks include the development of Michigan, No. 620105602,,- design flow rates, storm sewer and inlet spacing calculations, culvert 2009 and bridge hydraulic design, water surface elevation calculations, scour Ohio, No. 77598, 2013 calculations, and alternatives analysis. He is familiar with both HEC- RAS and HEC-GeoRAS. Mr. Voss has also completed water distributionn r modeling for clients, including model calibration to hydrant test results, Key Qualificatiorit analysis of pressures and available fire flow rates,alternatives analysis,and • Hydraulics modeling waterhammer calculations.He is familiar with EPANET,InfoWater,InfoSurge, technical leader H2OMap Water, and WaterGEMS software. • Familiar with EPANET, InfoWater, InfoSurge, Mr. Voss has completed and reviewed hydraulic analyses for several H2OMap Water, and Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) road design projects, WaterGEMS software. including experience with both open channel and storm sewer • Model calibration, test drainage. Projects included the delineation of drainage boundaries and results, pressure analysis development of peak flow rates using the Modified Michigan SCS or • Water system upgrades Rational Method. Open channel projects required an analysis of existing and recommendations and proposed water surface elevations usually requiring HEC-RAS. Storm sewer and inlet calculations were completed using templates in the MDOT Drainage Manual. In June 2015, Mr.Voss became the Hydraulics Modeling Technical Group Leader for Tetra Tech's Eastern Region. Relevant Project Experience: Port Miami Expansion, Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer District, Miami, FL Lead Hydraulic Engineer. Utilized the District's 190,000-node extended period simulation model to assess improvements needed to convey 20,000 gpm of drinking water to Port Miami to allow for filling the ships in the port. Study was initiated because of the planned Port expansion to include more slips and the low pressures that currently occur during ship filling. New conveyance in the form of a 42-inch water main with twin 36- inch water mains under the bay between the mainland and the island where the Port is located. Up to 4.5 MG of storage was also considered. Proposed solution maintained pressures on the island above 50 psi during the peak demand. E:ft TETRATECH 126 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes Estero Boulevard Phases II-IV Water Main Improvements, Fort Myers Beach, FL Lead Hydraulic Engineer. Tetra Tech was selected based on our work in the first phase of the design. Used the Town's InfoWater model to size two parallel replacement mains for the remaining 24,000 feet of the Town's primary water transmission corridor along Estero Boulevard. Model was also used to identify areas of poor pressure and fire flow on 90 side streets with dead end water mains. Model results were used as the basis of design. Many of the 3- to 6-inch diameter mains were recommended for replacement with 8-inch diameter mains. A few larger water mains were recommended to be left in place. Total length of replacement water main in the design on the side streets was 110,000 feet. North Estero Boulevard Phase II Side Street Water Main Improvements, Fort Myers Beach, FL. ead Hydraulic Engineer. Town's InfoWater model was used to identify areas of poor pressure and fire flow on 14 side streets with dead end water mains that were connected in the area of the new 10-and 16-inch transmission water main on Estero Boulevard that were designed in 2015. Model results were used as the basis of design. Many of the 3-to 6-inch diameter mains were recommended for replacement with 8-inch diameter mains.Total length of replacement water main in the design was 20,500 feet. Water Reliability Study, Kimball Township, MI. September 2016-present. Lead Hydraulic Engineer. Prepared the Township's first water reliability study including GIS mapping and modeling of the system, which had never been done before. Model was calibrated using hydrant tests and the system performance was evaluated using an extended period simulation. Water Reliability Study, Madison Township, MI Lead Hydraulic Engineer. Updated the 2011 Water Reliability Study, also prepared by Tetra Tech. Tasks include updating the general plan map, model calibration, reliability assessment, and report to meet the Act 399 requirements. Extended period simulation capabilities were added to the City's steady state InfoWater model to better understand the storage needs of the system.Extended period simulation showed a smaller storage volume was necessary than recommended in the previous Water Reliability Study and,therefore, any new storage could be delayed further into the future. Recommended improvements included a new water supply source, either in the form of a new well or an interconnection with the neighboring utility. Water Reliability Study,Tecumseh, MI Lead Hydraulic Engineer. Updated the 2012 Water Reliability Study, also prepared by Tetra Tech. Tasks include updating the general plan map, model calibration, reliability assessment, and report to meet the Act 399 requirements. A field assessment was also made during hydrant testing to address complications at two of the testing locations. Hydrant tests showed unusually low pressures in the southwest portion of the City. A simple model calibration could not reproduce the results, but a model calibration with a closed valve on a specific reach of water main was used.The City checked this pipe segment for a closed valve and found one. Extended period simulation capabilities were added to the City's steady state InfoWater model to better understand the storage needs of the system. Extended period simulation showed a smaller storage volume was necessary than recommended in the previous Water Reliability Study and, therefore, any new storage could be delayed further into the future. Estero Boulevard Phase I Water Main Improvements, Fort Myers Beach, FL Lead Hydraulic Engineer. An InfoWater model maintained by the Town was used to confirm that pressure and fire flow goals would be met with the replacement and consolidation of several smaller water mains into a dual transmission and distribution mains.This was the initial phase of a four-phase project and set the likely water main sizes for future projects. 41! 127 •,i iii: n,i / :r eo 1 1 f \\0 \\\ \:„ 1 \\ \\ � James Christophe,r PE, B Corrosion Control and Corrosion Prevention Expert CPP Mr. Christopher is highly qualified in environmental engineering, with special expertise in water resources; water quality; reverse osmosis, pumping system analysis/station design; hydraulic analysis; pipelineYears of Experience: design; wastewater collection, treatment, effluent reuse/ utilization/ disposal; facility planning; construction and administration and overall Education N project administration and coordination. BS, Chemistry, Duke University,197 . - Relevant Project Expeence: MS, Environmental Engineering Corrosion Inhibitor Testing Technical Support, City of Port St. Lucie, FL. and Science, University of Project Engineer.Tetra Tech provided the design and construction services Central Florida, 1980 for the City's two reverse osmosis (RO) treatment plants. Both plants use chloramines as the secondary disinfectant for maintenance of a residual Certifications: and an ortho-polyphosphate corrosion inhibitor for corrosion control Professional Engineer, Florida, in the distribution system. Tetra Tech assisted the City with a coupon No.34204 testing program to evaluate several different corrosion control inhibitors, evaluation of corrosion by-products at automatic flushing locations within Professional Engineer, Georgia, the distribution system, provided a summaryletter summarizinglead and No. 40943 Y copper results and recommendations for further optimization of corrosion Affiliations: control, provided measures to mitigate distribution system corrosion at American Water Wore;, automatic flushing locations, performed qualitative analysis of insoluble Association zincprecipitates in distributionsamples, and participated in several teleconferences to exchange information and provide general technical Florida Pollution Coiifrb assistance. Associatio Corrosion Control Chemical Analysis, City of Kalamazoo, MI Water Environment Technolo gy Project Engineer. The City of Kalamazoo has been feeding sodium Southeast Desalting hexametaphosphate as a sequestering agent for iron and also as a Association g corrosion control measure. The City installed iron removal facilities and American Membrane the requirement for sequestration of iron became a secondary concern Technology Association compared to the need to continue to maintain adequate corrosion control within the system. The City is considering changing the corrosion Water Reuse Association control chemical to an orthophosphate-based solution to provide a higher American Academy of level of corrosion control against lead and other metallic components Environmental Engineers within the distribution system. The City retained Tetra Tech to develop a recommendation that would be appropriate for their system. Tetra Tech Key Qualifications: performed a desktop analysis and review of the current corrosion control • Application of corrosion practices and will prepare a memorandum summarizing the water quality inhibitors for water of each of the sources and the findings. distribution systems. • Development of corrosion Water Corrosion Study, Ann Arbor, MI mitigation strategies for Project water distribution systems. jec Engin g eer.The University of Michigan (U of M) experienced marked • Extensive experience in corrosion and premature failures of plumbing components throughout the pipeline and pumping campus. U of M receives its water supply from the City of Ann Arbor.Tetra stations design. Tech was selected to conduct a study evaluating the characteristics of the • Water quality evaluation treated City of Ann Arbor potable water, the U of M Domestic Hot Water supply and recirculation system, and the documented plumbing system component deterioration and failures.Tetra Tech defined a watertreatment TETRA TECH approach to reduce plumbing system failures and be acceptable to the various regulatory agencies.Once the most likely cause(s) of the problem 128 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes were identified, Tetra Tech reviewed a set of treatment alternatives and provide recommendations to reduce plumbing component failures.The project was particularly challenging because the standard industry approach (use of phosphorus based corrosion inhibitors) is problematic, due to strict phosphorus limitations at the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant. Tetra Tech identified an acceptable response to reduce corrosion and plumbing system failures. Puerto Rico Army National Guard, Camp Santiago, Puerto Rico Served as Project Engineer for water supply and distribution system troubleshooting condition assessment efforts at military training facility. Project tasks included development of a distribution system water quality sampling plan, evaluation of sampling results, and providing recommendations to address elevated lead corrosion and other water quality issues related to substantial distribution water age issues during low demand periods. Recommendations included the conducting of corrosion coupon testing, pilot testing of corrosion inhibitors, and initial parameters for a system flushing plan. Flint Water Response Data Management Project Support, Flint, MI Project Engineer. Tetra Tech is supporting the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in a number of efforts pertaining to Flint, Michigan. In May 2016, Tetra Tech was tasked to prepare a Flint Strike Team to respond to emergency situations. The team will conduct training with EPA's water team to understand the unique sampling events being conducted in Flint and respond to Flint emergency sampling events as direct by EPA. Tetra Tech is currently providing data management for the Flint water sampling efforts, including data collection, storage, and sharing. Tetra Tech coordinates with the field sampling team and performs QA/QC review for the field data exports for processing with Scribe and uploads daily into a Scribe project. As the lab results for the water samples become available,they are uploaded into Scribe and joined with the data collected in the field.When analytical results are received from the laboratory, the data undergo QA/QC review by EPA are uploaded into the Scribe database. Tetra Tech coordinates with laboratories to establish EDD formats and developed a processing database to load EDDs to Scribe. Norwood-Oeffler Water Treatment Plant Expansion, City of North Miami Beach, Florida Program Manager.This project includes preliminary and final designs,permitting (FDOH, FDEP,SFWMD,MD DERM), bidding/award and construction administration for expansion of the City's existing lime softening WTP from 17.67 MGD to 32.0 utilizing membrane treatment technology.The project included a 36-inch diameter raw water main coming from the Biscayne Aquifer well field,a 36-inch diameter pipe leaving the new high service pump building and running along NW 9th to 191st, a 36-inch diameter pipe running from the new WASD meter on 191st to the new ground storage tank, and a 36-inch diameter pipe going from the chlorine contact in the new ground storage tank to the post treatment structure, Biscayne Aquifer and Florida Aquifer source waters will be treated with Nanofiltration (NF) and low pressure reverse osmosis respectively. The expansion consists of i) expansion of the existing wellfield to include construction of 5 Biscayne Aquifer supply wells and 4 Floridan Aquifer supply wells, ii) raw water transmission mains. iii)9.0 MGD NF and 6.0 MGD low pressure RO membrane treatment systems. iv) pre-treatment facilities to include sand separators, microfiltration and chemical feed systems. v) post-treatment/ stabilization facilities to include force draft degasification , disinfection and finished water blending. vi) finished water ground storage and high service pumping. vii) class I deep injection well for concentrate (treatment low- product) disposal. James E. Anderson Water Treatment Plant Expansion, City of Port St. Lucie, Florida Engineer of Record. Project included the construction of 7 Floridan aquifer supply wells, one blend well and the addition of seven 2.0 MGD reverse osmosis skids, addition of feed and blend micron filters, expansion of the chemical feed system and expansion of the degasification and odor control facilities to increase the capacity in three construction milestones from 6.0 to 22.0 MGD. 129 so, a, / /, ''''' g v . 1 ,, \\,,,, \ I h' a \r r ,� y,k v�� , �� =FKenneth Caban, PE BCEE LEED AP ,,,, \\�\\\,,4,, a�\1\ Climate Change/Sea Level Rise/Adaptation/ -. Resiliency Exert, Master PJanning/Hydraullc ( Modeling/Systems Expansion deader Mr. Caban has over two decades of experience in the analysis, planning, design, permitting, inspection,and construction management of all water Years of Experiences' distribution systems. He has worked on the majority of water distribution systems in Miami-Dade County and numerous in South Florida. His H"%4/( xpeall analysis with steady-state and experience includes facets of hydraulic Education: dynamic models and planning, to detailed design, construction, and MS, Environmental Engineering, operation of large and complex water distribution systems. Florida International University, , 2007 In addition to his expertise with Water Distribution Systems, Mr. Caban has BS, Civil Engineering, Florida worked extensively in planning of adaptation and resiliency strategies International University, 1997 of drinking water and wastewater systems within Miami-Dade County. Because of his work related to Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Certifications:' Adaptation; p and Resiliency within Miami-Dade County, Mr. Caban was Professional Engineer, Florida, selected as a member of the Built Environment Work Groupof th No. 59276, 2003 the Southeast ,„ Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, whose mission is to develop Board Certified Environmental focused recommendations pertaining to regional climate mitigation and Engineer (BCEE) 5 adaptation issues in the built environment as part of a regional action plan. Mr. Caban has incorporated adaption and resiliency strategies into Leadership in Energy and improvements for the Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department Environmental Design and other utilities in South Florida. Accredited Professional (LEED AP) Relevant Project Expeence: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact- Built Environment Affiliations: Work Group Built Environment Work Group Mr. Ca ban was selected to assist in the development of focused of the Southeast Florida p Regional Climate Changerecommendations pertaining to regional climate mitigation and adaptation issues in the built environment as part of a regional action Compact plan. The working g groupassisted to identify possible recommendations, American Water Works evaluate the various recommendations, and to assist members of the Association Climate Compact on the most feasible strategies. Key Qualifications: Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Master Planning, Miami-Dade • Member of the Built County Water and Sewer Department, FL Environment Work Group Mr. Caban is leading a multidisciplinary team of engineers to plan and of the Southeast Florida develop preliminary designs for sanitary sewer expansion and improvement Regional Climate Change projects. All of the expansion projects required an evaluation of possible • Development of sea level rise impacts and mitigation strategies. The evaluation of sea adaptation strategies to g climate change in the level rise impacts and mitigation included confirmation of pump station region minimum slab elevations related to the base flood elevations, minimum • Extensive experience elevations for electrical equipment, water tight manhole covers, and in master planning for other mitigation strategies. water, wastewater and stormwater systems 20 Year Water Master Plan Update, Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer • Development and Department, FL implementation of capital Mr.Caban was the Project Managerresponsibleforthe 20 Year WaterMaster improvement programs Plan Update to identify, evaluate, and recommend future improvements for one of the largest water systems in the United States. In addition to LI.I.....t.), TETRA TECH the standard water demand projections and alternatives identification, a triple bottom line alternatives evaluation was utilized, which included 130 2 .2 Team Qualifications Resumes technical, economic, and social considerations. Inundation and other evaluations were conducted for 2-feet, 3-feet, and 4-feet sea level rise scenarios, which identified which WASD major infrastructure components were most at risk. Pump Stations D10/D11 Rehabilitation and Improvements, City of Fort Lauderdale, FL Quality Manager responsible for overseeing and providing quality control for the design the rehabilitation and improvements of two pump stations located in a portion of the City which experiences severe lunar tides flooding. Adaptation strategies incorporated into the design included raising of the electrical components of the pump station and hardening of the wetwell hatches. Stormwater Master Plan Update, Village of Key Biscayne, FL Project Manager for the updates to Stormwater Master Plan and the Floodplain Management Plan,which is one of the components required by the Community Rating System (CRS) in order to maintain and obtain additional credit for the 5-year CRS Cycle Recertification. This master plan included climate change and sea level rise adaptation/mitigation scenarios to remedy lunar tide flooding through incorporation of sea level rise projections and the installation of check valves at all outfalls. Other tasks included inventorying and mapping stormwater infrastructure in the City;hydrologic and hydraulic modeling using XP SWMM;preparing a stormwater atlas based on the GIS platform; identifying existing and future levels of service (LOS) based on water level rises for varying stormwater conditions; preparing cost estimates for alternatives; prioritizing improvements; identifying phased capital improvements; funding requirements; and coordination with stormwater rate study. Water Main Replacement Program, City of Hollywood, FL Program Manager overseeing numerous projects to rehabilitate the aged water distribution systems. To date, Mr. Caban has overseen and acted as quality manager for the surveying, design, permitting, bidding assistance and construction phase services for five projects with a combined length of water mains replaced or to be replaced of approximately 330,000 linear feet, or 62 miles. The pipe diameters range between 2-inches and 36-inches in diameter and include open cut and trenchless installations, including horizontal directional drilling and jack and bore. Various pipe materials are being used included ductile iron, polyvinyl chloride, high density polyethylene, steel, precast concrete cylindrical, and others.The projects also include existing meter relocations out of inaccessible easements to more accessible rights of ways, fire hydrants replacement, and pavement restorations and improvements. Detailed permitting coordination includes Broward County, Florida Department of Health, Florida Department of Transportation, Florida East Coast Railway, and others. 50-Year Water System Master Plan, City of Atlanta, GA Provided QA/QC for a water system master plan to provide the DWM with a 50-year plan.The City's water supply and treatment system consists of multiple facilities and an extensive network of water mains. Major components of this system are two intake structures, two raw water pumping stations, three reservoirs, three treatment plants with a total permitted capacity of 246.5 MGD, 15 pump stations, 12 storage tanks, five major administrative facilities and approximately 2,700 miles of water mains and pipes. South Miami Heights Water Treatment Plant-Reservoir and Pump Station, Miami-Dade County, FL Project Manager for the multi-discipline construction management team (as a subconsultant) acting as the County's Engineering Representatives for the delivery phase of a new 20 MGD water treatment facility utilizing membrane treatment was proposed in the SW service area. Project was initially anticipated to be delivered through three separate construction contracts. The first of these contracts consisted of a 5.0 MG potable water reservoir and high service pumping system that completed construction in 2012 and is currently operational as a storage and re-pump facility. Construction services provided for this contract included construction administration, participation in construction meetings, schedule and change order review, design modifications assistance, and site inspections. 131 ' V 0g-..; I 91 " - o ' A T Shimon Wdowinski, PhD Leader/Climate Chan v ./Sea • eel Rlse/ Adaptation/Resiliency'Exper1 Dr. Shimon Wdowinski is an associate professor at the department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, where he teaches 41,00, Years of Ex erg and researches geology, geophysics, and environmental sciences. His ence` work has focused on the development and usage of space geodetic techniques that can detect very precisely small movementsofthe Earth's surface. He successfully applied these technologies to study sea level rise, Education: %1 climate change, land subsidence, sinkhole development, tectonic plate University motion, earthquakes, and wetland surface flow. Dr. Wdowinski Served as M.S. in Engineering Sciences, a member in the Sea Level Rise working group of the advisory forum Harvard University Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact". He also served on two B.Sc in Earth Sciences, Hebrew Miami Beach-UM-FIU working groups that seek solutions for the increasing University, Jerusalem, Israel sea level hazard in Miami Beach. M.Sc. in Geology from the Relevant Project Expeence: Hebrew University, Jerusalem,J usa m e , Unified sea level projection for Southeast Florida Israel As a team member in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Post-doctoral research g at Scripps Institute of Compact Sea Level Rise Work Group, Dr.Wdowinski analyzed various data pp sources to provide a unified sea level projection for local governments Oceanography, UCSD (1990- and citizens. This guidance document describes the recommended d 1993) application of the projection as it relates to both high and low risk Key projects and short and long-term planning efforts. Also, the Work Group y �� cations: recommends that this guidance be updated everyfive to seven years • Quantitative analysis of various data types, spacebecause of the ongoing advances in scientific knowledge related to yp , global climate change and potential impacts. geodesy, remote sensing, tide gauge Assessment of flooding ' frequency and accelerating rates of sea level rise • Time analysis for in Miami Beach, Florida characterizing periodic and The team used multiple datasets for detectingfloodingevents in Miami anomalous patterns p • Analytical and numerical Beach and rates of sea level rise in southeast Florida. The study revealed modelin a significant increase in flooding events and sea level rise rate since g 2006.The results indicated that engineering solutions to SLR should rely on • Natural hazard assessments Team member in the regional SLR rate projections and not only on the commonly used global • SLR projections. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact The contribution of local land subsidence ' s dente to coastal flooding hazard along Sea Level Rise Work Group. the U.S. Atlantic coast • Sea Level Hazard in Miami Using InSAR observations,the team identified localized land subsidence in Beach two low lying coastal communities that further increase their vulnerability to sea level rise. The results showed the combined effect of subsidence and SLR further expose the subsiding areas to higher flooding hazard than the rest of the city. Holocene sea-level changes along the Mediterranean coast of Israel This study used based submerged archaeological observations and numerical models to determine eustatic sea level changes in the eastern Mediterranean. FIU Sea Level Solutions Cent=' 132